Program Name: 14.239 Home Investment Partnership Program Criteria: Federal loans are required to be reported on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards. (Section 200.502(b) of 2 CFR Part 200). Condition: The Organization had a federal loan that was not originally included on the Organization’s Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards. Cause of Condition: The Organization failed to properly identify the loan as needing to be reflected on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards. Potential Effect of Condition: The Organization’s federal loan not being included in the audited Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards. Recommendation: The Organization should establish policies and procedures to carefully review loans and consider whether they should be included on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards. Views of Responsible Officials: Management has acknowledged that this should be included in the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards and will include it as required in any applicable year.
Assistance Listing Number. Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 66.458, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Clean Water State Revolving Fund (CWSRF) ALN 21.027, U.S. Department of the Treasury, Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF) Federal Award Identification Number and Year - ALN 21.027 - SLFRP0127, program year 2021 Pass-through Entity - ALN 66.458 - EGLE ALN 21.027-EGLE Finding Type - Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - Per 2 CFR 200.510(b): The auditee must also prepare a schedule of expenditures of federal awards for the period covered by the auditee's financial statements, which must include the total federal awards expended determined in accordance with § 200.502. While not required, the auditee may choose to provide information requested by federal awarding agencies and pass-through entities to make the schedule easier to use. Condition - The schedule of expenditures of federal awards (SEFA) was incomplete and inaccurate. Questioned Costs - None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - Not applicable Context - In fiscal year 2023, the City expended approximately $1.5 million of federal funding. The funding was received by various departments within the City from several federal and nonfederal entities. The City accumulates the financial data and other required information to complete the SEFA. Adjustments to correct the SEFA were required as follows: - $69,880 of expenditures was removed from the SEFA provided to the auditors by the City related to ALN 66.458 - $295,000 of expenditures was added to the SEFA provided to the auditors by the City related to ALN 21.027 Cause and Effect - Controls in place did not ensure the SEFA was complete and accurate, and, as a result, the errors had the following impact: - $69,880 of expenditures was removed from ALN 66.458; as a result, CWSRF was overstated. - $295,000 of expenditures was added to ALN 21.027; as a result, CSLFRF was understated, impacting major program determination. These errors have been corrected on the SEFA. Recommendation - The City should implement a process to ensure the SEFA is complete and accurate by thoroughly reviewing agreements for grants received and reconciling the SEFA to a final trial balance prior to the start of the audit. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - We are implementing a procedure whereby the controller’s office receives copies of all contracts to ensure all reporting requirements are met and financial deliverables are completed according to the schedules.
Assistance Listing Number. Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 66.458, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Clean Water State Revolving Fund (CWSRF) ALN 21.027, U.S. Department of the Treasury, Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF) Federal Award Identification Number and Year - ALN 21.027 - SLFRP0127, program year 2021 Pass-through Entity - ALN 66.458 - EGLE ALN 21.027-EGLE Finding Type - Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - Per 2 CFR 200.510(b): The auditee must also prepare a schedule of expenditures of federal awards for the period covered by the auditee's financial statements, which must include the total federal awards expended determined in accordance with § 200.502. While not required, the auditee may choose to provide information requested by federal awarding agencies and pass-through entities to make the schedule easier to use. Condition - The schedule of expenditures of federal awards (SEFA) was incomplete and inaccurate. Questioned Costs - None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - Not applicable Context - In fiscal year 2023, the City expended approximately $1.5 million of federal funding. The funding was received by various departments within the City from several federal and nonfederal entities. The City accumulates the financial data and other required information to complete the SEFA. Adjustments to correct the SEFA were required as follows: - $69,880 of expenditures was removed from the SEFA provided to the auditors by the City related to ALN 66.458 - $295,000 of expenditures was added to the SEFA provided to the auditors by the City related to ALN 21.027 Cause and Effect - Controls in place did not ensure the SEFA was complete and accurate, and, as a result, the errors had the following impact: - $69,880 of expenditures was removed from ALN 66.458; as a result, CWSRF was overstated. - $295,000 of expenditures was added to ALN 21.027; as a result, CSLFRF was understated, impacting major program determination. These errors have been corrected on the SEFA. Recommendation - The City should implement a process to ensure the SEFA is complete and accurate by thoroughly reviewing agreements for grants received and reconciling the SEFA to a final trial balance prior to the start of the audit. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - We are implementing a procedure whereby the controller’s office receives copies of all contracts to ensure all reporting requirements are met and financial deliverables are completed according to the schedules.
Assistance Listing Number. Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 66.458, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Clean Water State Revolving Fund (CWSRF) ALN 21.027, U.S. Department of the Treasury, Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF) Federal Award Identification Number and Year - ALN 21.027 - SLFRP0127, program year 2021 Pass-through Entity - ALN 66.458 - EGLE ALN 21.027-EGLE Finding Type - Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - Per 2 CFR 200.510(b): The auditee must also prepare a schedule of expenditures of federal awards for the period covered by the auditee's financial statements, which must include the total federal awards expended determined in accordance with § 200.502. While not required, the auditee may choose to provide information requested by federal awarding agencies and pass-through entities to make the schedule easier to use. Condition - The schedule of expenditures of federal awards (SEFA) was incomplete and inaccurate. Questioned Costs - None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - Not applicable Context - In fiscal year 2023, the City expended approximately $1.5 million of federal funding. The funding was received by various departments within the City from several federal and nonfederal entities. The City accumulates the financial data and other required information to complete the SEFA. Adjustments to correct the SEFA were required as follows: - $69,880 of expenditures was removed from the SEFA provided to the auditors by the City related to ALN 66.458 - $295,000 of expenditures was added to the SEFA provided to the auditors by the City related to ALN 21.027 Cause and Effect - Controls in place did not ensure the SEFA was complete and accurate, and, as a result, the errors had the following impact: - $69,880 of expenditures was removed from ALN 66.458; as a result, CWSRF was overstated. - $295,000 of expenditures was added to ALN 21.027; as a result, CSLFRF was understated, impacting major program determination. These errors have been corrected on the SEFA. Recommendation - The City should implement a process to ensure the SEFA is complete and accurate by thoroughly reviewing agreements for grants received and reconciling the SEFA to a final trial balance prior to the start of the audit. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - We are implementing a procedure whereby the controller’s office receives copies of all contracts to ensure all reporting requirements are met and financial deliverables are completed according to the schedules.
2023‐001 Internal Controls over Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Preparation (Material Weakness) Federal Agency: Department of Education Cluster Name: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) Assistance Listing Numbers: 84.027 and 84.173 Award period: Year ended June 30, 2023 Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200, Subpart F, the District is required to prepare a schedule of federal expenditures, which must include the total federal awards expended as determined in accordance with §200.502. An effective internal control system exists if controls are effective in preventing or detecting material misstatements in the preparation of the schedule of federal expenditures of federal awards (the schedule). It provides reasonable assurance for the reliability of financial information and compliance with laws and regulations. Condition: We have determined that there was an inadequate design of internal control over the preparation of the schedule during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. The current financial reporting process does not ensure accuracy and completeness in the preparation of the schedule as required by Uniform Guidance. Cause: The District’s policies and procedures were not designed to prepare the schedule in conformity with Uniform Guidance. Effect: The District did not prepare the schedule in conformity with Uniform Guidance. This increases the likelihood of a material misstatement and noncompliance with laws and regulations. Recommendation: We recommend the Board of Education and management review the financial reporting process. Once this review is complete, the District should then perform a risk assessment to determine the best way to implement appropriate internal controls over financial reporting to ensure conformity with Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs: None Repeat Finding: Yes. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and plans to develop proper written policies and procedures for the internal control over compliance to ensure accuracy and completeness in the preparation of the schedule as required by Uniform Guidance.
2023‐001 Internal Controls over Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Preparation (Material Weakness) Federal Agency: Department of Education Cluster Name: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) Assistance Listing Numbers: 84.027 and 84.173 Award period: Year ended June 30, 2023 Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200, Subpart F, the District is required to prepare a schedule of federal expenditures, which must include the total federal awards expended as determined in accordance with §200.502. An effective internal control system exists if controls are effective in preventing or detecting material misstatements in the preparation of the schedule of federal expenditures of federal awards (the schedule). It provides reasonable assurance for the reliability of financial information and compliance with laws and regulations. Condition: We have determined that there was an inadequate design of internal control over the preparation of the schedule during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. The current financial reporting process does not ensure accuracy and completeness in the preparation of the schedule as required by Uniform Guidance. Cause: The District’s policies and procedures were not designed to prepare the schedule in conformity with Uniform Guidance. Effect: The District did not prepare the schedule in conformity with Uniform Guidance. This increases the likelihood of a material misstatement and noncompliance with laws and regulations. Recommendation: We recommend the Board of Education and management review the financial reporting process. Once this review is complete, the District should then perform a risk assessment to determine the best way to implement appropriate internal controls over financial reporting to ensure conformity with Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs: None Repeat Finding: Yes. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and plans to develop proper written policies and procedures for the internal control over compliance to ensure accuracy and completeness in the preparation of the schedule as required by Uniform Guidance.
2023 – 001 BASIS FOR DETERMINING FEDERAL AWARDS EXPENDED – SEFA EXPENDITURES Criteria: 2 CFR § 200.502 explains that the value of Federal awards expended under loan programs, the use of loan proceeds under loan and loan guarantee programs are to be reported on the Schedule of Federal Expenditures of Federal Awards. Condition: The Schedule of Federal Expenditures of Federal Awards did not appropriately present the USDA Loans. Cause: The Council should make sure that expenditures are appropriately characterized as loans or federal grant expenditures. Effect: Loans may not be correctly reported on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards. Questioned Cost: -0-. Recommendation: We recommend that the Schedule of Federal Expenditures of Federal Awards appropriately includes and measures loans and loan guarantees in accordance with 2 CFR § 200.502(b) and (c) of the Uniform Guidance.
2023–012 REPORTING - SCHEDULE OF EXPENDITURES OF FEDERAL AWARDS Federal Program Information: Federal Agency and Program Name Assistance Listing # U.S. Department of the Interior Abandoned Mine Land Reclamation (AMLR) Grants 15.252, Grant Award S16AF20058, Grant Award S18AF20000, Grant Award S19AF20000, Grant Award S19AF20020. Grant Award S20AF20008, Grant Award S20AF20038, Grant Award S20AF20094, Grant Award S21AF10040, Grant Award S22AF00013, Grant Award S22AF00039, Grant Award S23AF00013, Grant Award S23AF00059, Grant Award S23AF00107 Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory or other citation): 2 CFR 200.303 requires that a non-federal entity must “(a) establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States and the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Uniform Guidance 2 CFR section 200.510 states, “(b) Schedule of expenditures of Federal awards. The auditee must also prepare a schedule of expenditures of federal awards (SEFA) for the period covered by the auditee’s financial statements which must include the total Federal awards expended as determined in accordance with §200.502 Basis for determining Federal awards expended.” Condition: The West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection (the Department)’s internal controls are not adequate to ensure the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) accurately reports all federal assistance. The Department’s SEFA for fiscal year 2023 under the Abandoned Mine Land Reclamation (AMLR) Grants program excluded indirect costs preliminary SEFA. Cause: The internal controls over the SEFA reporting processes were not operating effectively to ensure the SEFA included indirect costs. Effect or Potential Effect: The Department is not properly reporting their federal expenditures and major programs may not be appropriately identified. Questioned Costs: N/A Context: Total indirect costs for fiscal 2023, totaling $1,592,074, were incorrectly excluded from the SEFA. Management corrected the final SEFA. Total federal expenditures for the AMLR Grants program were $31,223,217 for the year ended June 30, 2023. Identification as a Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding from the prior year. Recommendation: We recommend that the Department ensure staff responsible for the preparation of the SEFA be provided guidance on recording indirect expenses on the SEFA and the SEFA be reviewed and approved by supervising personnel. Views of Responsible Officials: Management concurs with the finding and has developed a plan to correct the finding.
Criteria or specific requirement: Entities receiving federal awards must identify in its accounts all federal awards expended and report those amounts on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards for the period the federal award was expensed. Specifically, in accordance with Uniform Administrative Requirements outlined in 2 CFR 200, the guidance states: Per 2 CFR 200.502, The determination of when a Federal award is expended must be based on when the activity related to the Federal award occurs. Per 2 CFR 200.303, entities must establish and maintain internal controls which provide reasonable assurance that federal award expenditures are in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In addition, per 2 CFR 200.510, the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) must be prepared to reflect the awards for the period covered by the auditee’s financial statements. Lastly, section 2 CFR 200.510 states that for costs to be allowable, they should be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (with exceptions provided in that part). Condition: The University’s year-end cutoff controls allowed for certain costs from Fiscal Year 2022 to not be reported in the Fiscal Year 2022 SEFA but rather reported in the Fiscal Year 2023 SEFA. Context: During our testing of 40 payroll transactions, we found one instance of 2022 fringe benefits being charged to a federal program in 2023. In addition, during our testing of 40 general disbursements transactions, we identified four instances of 2022 costs being charged to federal programs in 2023. Questioned costs: Known amounts of 2022 costs included in the 2023 SEFA was $3,214. (ALNs: 47.041, 47.083, 93.866, and 10.310 Award Numbers: 1663642, 1757324, R01AG059923, and 2022-67020-36410) Cause: Per the University, the cause for the five exceptions were due to: The one payroll exception was due to the 2021-2022 Human Capital Management (HCM) implementation and the issues that implementation brought about. As disclosed in a direct communication with the University’s cognizant agency, the initial custom software used for the allocation of fringe benefit costs did not work appropriately. As a result, throughout 2022, the University dedicated significant resources to address the HCM shortcomings. Then, in 2023, various corrections were made (again, as disclosed to the cognizant agency.) This sample was one of those costs that was identified as not properly being allocated to the federal program in the prior year; thus, was charged to the federal government in the current fiscal year. Three of the four general disbursement exceptions related to the University’s procurement card accrual policy. Currently, the University’s accrues for procurement card purchases through June 23, which leaves seven days of activity that flows into the next fiscal year. Three of our samples relate to procurement card charges incurred during these seven days. The last of the four general disbursements that related to a prior year but reported in the Fiscal Year 2023 was due to a staffing issue. A key employee responsible for monitoring specific departmental charges fell ill and was out for a period of time. Upon the employee’s return, the employee spent time analyzing charges and identified the cost that should have been recorded as a federal charge in the prior year; thus, then charged the federal agency in Fiscal Year 2023. Effect: The University was out of compliance as it relates to identifying and reporting federal costs in the period incurred. Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the University evaluate its cutoff procedures to ensure federal costs are identified and reported in the correct fiscal year. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding and has developed a plan to correct the finding.
Criteria or specific requirement: Entities receiving federal awards must identify in its accounts all federal awards expended and report those amounts on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards for the period the federal award was expensed. Specifically, in accordance with Uniform Administrative Requirements outlined in 2 CFR 200, the guidance states: Per 2 CFR 200.502, The determination of when a Federal award is expended must be based on when the activity related to the Federal award occurs. Per 2 CFR 200.303, entities must establish and maintain internal controls which provide reasonable assurance that federal award expenditures are in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In addition, per 2 CFR 200.510, the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) must be prepared to reflect the awards for the period covered by the auditee’s financial statements. Lastly, section 2 CFR 200.510 states that for costs to be allowable, they should be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (with exceptions provided in that part). Condition: The University’s year-end cutoff controls allowed for certain costs from Fiscal Year 2022 to not be reported in the Fiscal Year 2022 SEFA but rather reported in the Fiscal Year 2023 SEFA. Context: During our testing of 40 payroll transactions, we found one instance of 2022 fringe benefits being charged to a federal program in 2023. In addition, during our testing of 40 general disbursements transactions, we identified four instances of 2022 costs being charged to federal programs in 2023. Questioned costs: Known amounts of 2022 costs included in the 2023 SEFA was $3,214. (ALNs: 47.041, 47.083, 93.866, and 10.310 Award Numbers: 1663642, 1757324, R01AG059923, and 2022-67020-36410) Cause: Per the University, the cause for the five exceptions were due to: The one payroll exception was due to the 2021-2022 Human Capital Management (HCM) implementation and the issues that implementation brought about. As disclosed in a direct communication with the University’s cognizant agency, the initial custom software used for the allocation of fringe benefit costs did not work appropriately. As a result, throughout 2022, the University dedicated significant resources to address the HCM shortcomings. Then, in 2023, various corrections were made (again, as disclosed to the cognizant agency.) This sample was one of those costs that was identified as not properly being allocated to the federal program in the prior year; thus, was charged to the federal government in the current fiscal year. Three of the four general disbursement exceptions related to the University’s procurement card accrual policy. Currently, the University’s accrues for procurement card purchases through June 23, which leaves seven days of activity that flows into the next fiscal year. Three of our samples relate to procurement card charges incurred during these seven days. The last of the four general disbursements that related to a prior year but reported in the Fiscal Year 2023 was due to a staffing issue. A key employee responsible for monitoring specific departmental charges fell ill and was out for a period of time. Upon the employee’s return, the employee spent time analyzing charges and identified the cost that should have been recorded as a federal charge in the prior year; thus, then charged the federal agency in Fiscal Year 2023. Effect: The University was out of compliance as it relates to identifying and reporting federal costs in the period incurred. Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the University evaluate its cutoff procedures to ensure federal costs are identified and reported in the correct fiscal year. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding and has developed a plan to correct the finding.
Criteria or specific requirement: Entities receiving federal awards must identify in its accounts all federal awards expended and report those amounts on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards for the period the federal award was expensed. Specifically, in accordance with Uniform Administrative Requirements outlined in 2 CFR 200, the guidance states: Per 2 CFR 200.502, The determination of when a Federal award is expended must be based on when the activity related to the Federal award occurs. Per 2 CFR 200.303, entities must establish and maintain internal controls which provide reasonable assurance that federal award expenditures are in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In addition, per 2 CFR 200.510, the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) must be prepared to reflect the awards for the period covered by the auditee’s financial statements. Lastly, section 2 CFR 200.510 states that for costs to be allowable, they should be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (with exceptions provided in that part). Condition: The University’s year-end cutoff controls allowed for certain costs from Fiscal Year 2022 to not be reported in the Fiscal Year 2022 SEFA but rather reported in the Fiscal Year 2023 SEFA. Context: During our testing of 40 payroll transactions, we found one instance of 2022 fringe benefits being charged to a federal program in 2023. In addition, during our testing of 40 general disbursements transactions, we identified four instances of 2022 costs being charged to federal programs in 2023. Questioned costs: Known amounts of 2022 costs included in the 2023 SEFA was $3,214. (ALNs: 47.041, 47.083, 93.866, and 10.310 Award Numbers: 1663642, 1757324, R01AG059923, and 2022-67020-36410) Cause: Per the University, the cause for the five exceptions were due to: The one payroll exception was due to the 2021-2022 Human Capital Management (HCM) implementation and the issues that implementation brought about. As disclosed in a direct communication with the University’s cognizant agency, the initial custom software used for the allocation of fringe benefit costs did not work appropriately. As a result, throughout 2022, the University dedicated significant resources to address the HCM shortcomings. Then, in 2023, various corrections were made (again, as disclosed to the cognizant agency.) This sample was one of those costs that was identified as not properly being allocated to the federal program in the prior year; thus, was charged to the federal government in the current fiscal year. Three of the four general disbursement exceptions related to the University’s procurement card accrual policy. Currently, the University’s accrues for procurement card purchases through June 23, which leaves seven days of activity that flows into the next fiscal year. Three of our samples relate to procurement card charges incurred during these seven days. The last of the four general disbursements that related to a prior year but reported in the Fiscal Year 2023 was due to a staffing issue. A key employee responsible for monitoring specific departmental charges fell ill and was out for a period of time. Upon the employee’s return, the employee spent time analyzing charges and identified the cost that should have been recorded as a federal charge in the prior year; thus, then charged the federal agency in Fiscal Year 2023. Effect: The University was out of compliance as it relates to identifying and reporting federal costs in the period incurred. Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the University evaluate its cutoff procedures to ensure federal costs are identified and reported in the correct fiscal year. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding and has developed a plan to correct the finding.
Criteria or specific requirement: Entities receiving federal awards must identify in its accounts all federal awards expended and report those amounts on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards for the period the federal award was expensed. Specifically, in accordance with Uniform Administrative Requirements outlined in 2 CFR 200, the guidance states: Per 2 CFR 200.502, The determination of when a Federal award is expended must be based on when the activity related to the Federal award occurs. Per 2 CFR 200.303, entities must establish and maintain internal controls which provide reasonable assurance that federal award expenditures are in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In addition, per 2 CFR 200.510, the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) must be prepared to reflect the awards for the period covered by the auditee’s financial statements. Lastly, section 2 CFR 200.510 states that for costs to be allowable, they should be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (with exceptions provided in that part). Condition: The University’s year-end cutoff controls allowed for certain costs from Fiscal Year 2022 to not be reported in the Fiscal Year 2022 SEFA but rather reported in the Fiscal Year 2023 SEFA. Context: During our testing of 40 payroll transactions, we found one instance of 2022 fringe benefits being charged to a federal program in 2023. In addition, during our testing of 40 general disbursements transactions, we identified four instances of 2022 costs being charged to federal programs in 2023. Questioned costs: Known amounts of 2022 costs included in the 2023 SEFA was $3,214. (ALNs: 47.041, 47.083, 93.866, and 10.310 Award Numbers: 1663642, 1757324, R01AG059923, and 2022-67020-36410) Cause: Per the University, the cause for the five exceptions were due to: The one payroll exception was due to the 2021-2022 Human Capital Management (HCM) implementation and the issues that implementation brought about. As disclosed in a direct communication with the University’s cognizant agency, the initial custom software used for the allocation of fringe benefit costs did not work appropriately. As a result, throughout 2022, the University dedicated significant resources to address the HCM shortcomings. Then, in 2023, various corrections were made (again, as disclosed to the cognizant agency.) This sample was one of those costs that was identified as not properly being allocated to the federal program in the prior year; thus, was charged to the federal government in the current fiscal year. Three of the four general disbursement exceptions related to the University’s procurement card accrual policy. Currently, the University’s accrues for procurement card purchases through June 23, which leaves seven days of activity that flows into the next fiscal year. Three of our samples relate to procurement card charges incurred during these seven days. The last of the four general disbursements that related to a prior year but reported in the Fiscal Year 2023 was due to a staffing issue. A key employee responsible for monitoring specific departmental charges fell ill and was out for a period of time. Upon the employee’s return, the employee spent time analyzing charges and identified the cost that should have been recorded as a federal charge in the prior year; thus, then charged the federal agency in Fiscal Year 2023. Effect: The University was out of compliance as it relates to identifying and reporting federal costs in the period incurred. Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the University evaluate its cutoff procedures to ensure federal costs are identified and reported in the correct fiscal year. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding and has developed a plan to correct the finding.
Criteria or specific requirement: Entities receiving federal awards must identify in its accounts all federal awards expended and report those amounts on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards for the period the federal award was expensed. Specifically, in accordance with Uniform Administrative Requirements outlined in 2 CFR 200, the guidance states: Per 2 CFR 200.502, The determination of when a Federal award is expended must be based on when the activity related to the Federal award occurs. Per 2 CFR 200.303, entities must establish and maintain internal controls which provide reasonable assurance that federal award expenditures are in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In addition, per 2 CFR 200.510, the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) must be prepared to reflect the awards for the period covered by the auditee’s financial statements. Lastly, section 2 CFR 200.510 states that for costs to be allowable, they should be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (with exceptions provided in that part). Condition: The University’s year-end cutoff controls allowed for certain costs from Fiscal Year 2022 to not be reported in the Fiscal Year 2022 SEFA but rather reported in the Fiscal Year 2023 SEFA. Context: During our testing of 40 payroll transactions, we found one instance of 2022 fringe benefits being charged to a federal program in 2023. In addition, during our testing of 40 general disbursements transactions, we identified four instances of 2022 costs being charged to federal programs in 2023. Questioned costs: Known amounts of 2022 costs included in the 2023 SEFA was $3,214. (ALNs: 47.041, 47.083, 93.866, and 10.310 Award Numbers: 1663642, 1757324, R01AG059923, and 2022-67020-36410) Cause: Per the University, the cause for the five exceptions were due to: The one payroll exception was due to the 2021-2022 Human Capital Management (HCM) implementation and the issues that implementation brought about. As disclosed in a direct communication with the University’s cognizant agency, the initial custom software used for the allocation of fringe benefit costs did not work appropriately. As a result, throughout 2022, the University dedicated significant resources to address the HCM shortcomings. Then, in 2023, various corrections were made (again, as disclosed to the cognizant agency.) This sample was one of those costs that was identified as not properly being allocated to the federal program in the prior year; thus, was charged to the federal government in the current fiscal year. Three of the four general disbursement exceptions related to the University’s procurement card accrual policy. Currently, the University’s accrues for procurement card purchases through June 23, which leaves seven days of activity that flows into the next fiscal year. Three of our samples relate to procurement card charges incurred during these seven days. The last of the four general disbursements that related to a prior year but reported in the Fiscal Year 2023 was due to a staffing issue. A key employee responsible for monitoring specific departmental charges fell ill and was out for a period of time. Upon the employee’s return, the employee spent time analyzing charges and identified the cost that should have been recorded as a federal charge in the prior year; thus, then charged the federal agency in Fiscal Year 2023. Effect: The University was out of compliance as it relates to identifying and reporting federal costs in the period incurred. Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the University evaluate its cutoff procedures to ensure federal costs are identified and reported in the correct fiscal year. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding and has developed a plan to correct the finding.
Criteria or specific requirement: Entities receiving federal awards must identify in its accounts all federal awards expended and report those amounts on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards for the period the federal award was expensed. Specifically, in accordance with Uniform Administrative Requirements outlined in 2 CFR 200, the guidance states: Per 2 CFR 200.502, The determination of when a Federal award is expended must be based on when the activity related to the Federal award occurs. Per 2 CFR 200.303, entities must establish and maintain internal controls which provide reasonable assurance that federal award expenditures are in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In addition, per 2 CFR 200.510, the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) must be prepared to reflect the awards for the period covered by the auditee’s financial statements. Lastly, section 2 CFR 200.510 states that for costs to be allowable, they should be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (with exceptions provided in that part). Condition: The University’s year-end cutoff controls allowed for certain costs from Fiscal Year 2022 to not be reported in the Fiscal Year 2022 SEFA but rather reported in the Fiscal Year 2023 SEFA. Context: During our testing of 40 payroll transactions, we found one instance of 2022 fringe benefits being charged to a federal program in 2023. In addition, during our testing of 40 general disbursements transactions, we identified four instances of 2022 costs being charged to federal programs in 2023. Questioned costs: Known amounts of 2022 costs included in the 2023 SEFA was $3,214. (ALNs: 47.041, 47.083, 93.866, and 10.310 Award Numbers: 1663642, 1757324, R01AG059923, and 2022-67020-36410) Cause: Per the University, the cause for the five exceptions were due to: The one payroll exception was due to the 2021-2022 Human Capital Management (HCM) implementation and the issues that implementation brought about. As disclosed in a direct communication with the University’s cognizant agency, the initial custom software used for the allocation of fringe benefit costs did not work appropriately. As a result, throughout 2022, the University dedicated significant resources to address the HCM shortcomings. Then, in 2023, various corrections were made (again, as disclosed to the cognizant agency.) This sample was one of those costs that was identified as not properly being allocated to the federal program in the prior year; thus, was charged to the federal government in the current fiscal year. Three of the four general disbursement exceptions related to the University’s procurement card accrual policy. Currently, the University’s accrues for procurement card purchases through June 23, which leaves seven days of activity that flows into the next fiscal year. Three of our samples relate to procurement card charges incurred during these seven days. The last of the four general disbursements that related to a prior year but reported in the Fiscal Year 2023 was due to a staffing issue. A key employee responsible for monitoring specific departmental charges fell ill and was out for a period of time. Upon the employee’s return, the employee spent time analyzing charges and identified the cost that should have been recorded as a federal charge in the prior year; thus, then charged the federal agency in Fiscal Year 2023. Effect: The University was out of compliance as it relates to identifying and reporting federal costs in the period incurred. Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the University evaluate its cutoff procedures to ensure federal costs are identified and reported in the correct fiscal year. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding and has developed a plan to correct the finding.
Criteria or specific requirement: Entities receiving federal awards must identify in its accounts all federal awards expended and report those amounts on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards for the period the federal award was expensed. Specifically, in accordance with Uniform Administrative Requirements outlined in 2 CFR 200, the guidance states: Per 2 CFR 200.502, The determination of when a Federal award is expended must be based on when the activity related to the Federal award occurs. Per 2 CFR 200.303, entities must establish and maintain internal controls which provide reasonable assurance that federal award expenditures are in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In addition, per 2 CFR 200.510, the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) must be prepared to reflect the awards for the period covered by the auditee’s financial statements. Lastly, section 2 CFR 200.510 states that for costs to be allowable, they should be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (with exceptions provided in that part). Condition: The University’s year-end cutoff controls allowed for certain costs from Fiscal Year 2022 to not be reported in the Fiscal Year 2022 SEFA but rather reported in the Fiscal Year 2023 SEFA. Context: During our testing of 40 payroll transactions, we found one instance of 2022 fringe benefits being charged to a federal program in 2023. In addition, during our testing of 40 general disbursements transactions, we identified four instances of 2022 costs being charged to federal programs in 2023. Questioned costs: Known amounts of 2022 costs included in the 2023 SEFA was $3,214. (ALNs: 47.041, 47.083, 93.866, and 10.310 Award Numbers: 1663642, 1757324, R01AG059923, and 2022-67020-36410) Cause: Per the University, the cause for the five exceptions were due to: The one payroll exception was due to the 2021-2022 Human Capital Management (HCM) implementation and the issues that implementation brought about. As disclosed in a direct communication with the University’s cognizant agency, the initial custom software used for the allocation of fringe benefit costs did not work appropriately. As a result, throughout 2022, the University dedicated significant resources to address the HCM shortcomings. Then, in 2023, various corrections were made (again, as disclosed to the cognizant agency.) This sample was one of those costs that was identified as not properly being allocated to the federal program in the prior year; thus, was charged to the federal government in the current fiscal year. Three of the four general disbursement exceptions related to the University’s procurement card accrual policy. Currently, the University’s accrues for procurement card purchases through June 23, which leaves seven days of activity that flows into the next fiscal year. Three of our samples relate to procurement card charges incurred during these seven days. The last of the four general disbursements that related to a prior year but reported in the Fiscal Year 2023 was due to a staffing issue. A key employee responsible for monitoring specific departmental charges fell ill and was out for a period of time. Upon the employee’s return, the employee spent time analyzing charges and identified the cost that should have been recorded as a federal charge in the prior year; thus, then charged the federal agency in Fiscal Year 2023. Effect: The University was out of compliance as it relates to identifying and reporting federal costs in the period incurred. Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the University evaluate its cutoff procedures to ensure federal costs are identified and reported in the correct fiscal year. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding and has developed a plan to correct the finding.
Criteria or specific requirement: Entities receiving federal awards must identify in its accounts all federal awards expended and report those amounts on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards for the period the federal award was expensed. Specifically, in accordance with Uniform Administrative Requirements outlined in 2 CFR 200, the guidance states: Per 2 CFR 200.502, The determination of when a Federal award is expended must be based on when the activity related to the Federal award occurs. Per 2 CFR 200.303, entities must establish and maintain internal controls which provide reasonable assurance that federal award expenditures are in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In addition, per 2 CFR 200.510, the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) must be prepared to reflect the awards for the period covered by the auditee’s financial statements. Lastly, section 2 CFR 200.510 states that for costs to be allowable, they should be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (with exceptions provided in that part). Condition: The University’s year-end cutoff controls allowed for certain costs from Fiscal Year 2022 to not be reported in the Fiscal Year 2022 SEFA but rather reported in the Fiscal Year 2023 SEFA. Context: During our testing of 40 payroll transactions, we found one instance of 2022 fringe benefits being charged to a federal program in 2023. In addition, during our testing of 40 general disbursements transactions, we identified four instances of 2022 costs being charged to federal programs in 2023. Questioned costs: Known amounts of 2022 costs included in the 2023 SEFA was $3,214. (ALNs: 47.041, 47.083, 93.866, and 10.310 Award Numbers: 1663642, 1757324, R01AG059923, and 2022-67020-36410) Cause: Per the University, the cause for the five exceptions were due to: The one payroll exception was due to the 2021-2022 Human Capital Management (HCM) implementation and the issues that implementation brought about. As disclosed in a direct communication with the University’s cognizant agency, the initial custom software used for the allocation of fringe benefit costs did not work appropriately. As a result, throughout 2022, the University dedicated significant resources to address the HCM shortcomings. Then, in 2023, various corrections were made (again, as disclosed to the cognizant agency.) This sample was one of those costs that was identified as not properly being allocated to the federal program in the prior year; thus, was charged to the federal government in the current fiscal year. Three of the four general disbursement exceptions related to the University’s procurement card accrual policy. Currently, the University’s accrues for procurement card purchases through June 23, which leaves seven days of activity that flows into the next fiscal year. Three of our samples relate to procurement card charges incurred during these seven days. The last of the four general disbursements that related to a prior year but reported in the Fiscal Year 2023 was due to a staffing issue. A key employee responsible for monitoring specific departmental charges fell ill and was out for a period of time. Upon the employee’s return, the employee spent time analyzing charges and identified the cost that should have been recorded as a federal charge in the prior year; thus, then charged the federal agency in Fiscal Year 2023. Effect: The University was out of compliance as it relates to identifying and reporting federal costs in the period incurred. Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the University evaluate its cutoff procedures to ensure federal costs are identified and reported in the correct fiscal year. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding and has developed a plan to correct the finding.
Criteria or specific requirement: Entities receiving federal awards must identify in its accounts all federal awards expended and report those amounts on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards for the period the federal award was expensed. Specifically, in accordance with Uniform Administrative Requirements outlined in 2 CFR 200, the guidance states: Per 2 CFR 200.502, The determination of when a Federal award is expended must be based on when the activity related to the Federal award occurs. Per 2 CFR 200.303, entities must establish and maintain internal controls which provide reasonable assurance that federal award expenditures are in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In addition, per 2 CFR 200.510, the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) must be prepared to reflect the awards for the period covered by the auditee’s financial statements. Lastly, section 2 CFR 200.510 states that for costs to be allowable, they should be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (with exceptions provided in that part). Condition: The University’s year-end cutoff controls allowed for certain costs from Fiscal Year 2022 to not be reported in the Fiscal Year 2022 SEFA but rather reported in the Fiscal Year 2023 SEFA. Context: During our testing of 40 payroll transactions, we found one instance of 2022 fringe benefits being charged to a federal program in 2023. In addition, during our testing of 40 general disbursements transactions, we identified four instances of 2022 costs being charged to federal programs in 2023. Questioned costs: Known amounts of 2022 costs included in the 2023 SEFA was $3,214. (ALNs: 47.041, 47.083, 93.866, and 10.310 Award Numbers: 1663642, 1757324, R01AG059923, and 2022-67020-36410) Cause: Per the University, the cause for the five exceptions were due to: The one payroll exception was due to the 2021-2022 Human Capital Management (HCM) implementation and the issues that implementation brought about. As disclosed in a direct communication with the University’s cognizant agency, the initial custom software used for the allocation of fringe benefit costs did not work appropriately. As a result, throughout 2022, the University dedicated significant resources to address the HCM shortcomings. Then, in 2023, various corrections were made (again, as disclosed to the cognizant agency.) This sample was one of those costs that was identified as not properly being allocated to the federal program in the prior year; thus, was charged to the federal government in the current fiscal year. Three of the four general disbursement exceptions related to the University’s procurement card accrual policy. Currently, the University’s accrues for procurement card purchases through June 23, which leaves seven days of activity that flows into the next fiscal year. Three of our samples relate to procurement card charges incurred during these seven days. The last of the four general disbursements that related to a prior year but reported in the Fiscal Year 2023 was due to a staffing issue. A key employee responsible for monitoring specific departmental charges fell ill and was out for a period of time. Upon the employee’s return, the employee spent time analyzing charges and identified the cost that should have been recorded as a federal charge in the prior year; thus, then charged the federal agency in Fiscal Year 2023. Effect: The University was out of compliance as it relates to identifying and reporting federal costs in the period incurred. Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the University evaluate its cutoff procedures to ensure federal costs are identified and reported in the correct fiscal year. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding and has developed a plan to correct the finding.
Criteria or specific requirement: Entities receiving federal awards must identify in its accounts all federal awards expended and report those amounts on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards for the period the federal award was expensed. Specifically, in accordance with Uniform Administrative Requirements outlined in 2 CFR 200, the guidance states: Per 2 CFR 200.502, The determination of when a Federal award is expended must be based on when the activity related to the Federal award occurs. Per 2 CFR 200.303, entities must establish and maintain internal controls which provide reasonable assurance that federal award expenditures are in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In addition, per 2 CFR 200.510, the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) must be prepared to reflect the awards for the period covered by the auditee’s financial statements. Lastly, section 2 CFR 200.510 states that for costs to be allowable, they should be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (with exceptions provided in that part). Condition: The University’s year-end cutoff controls allowed for certain costs from Fiscal Year 2022 to not be reported in the Fiscal Year 2022 SEFA but rather reported in the Fiscal Year 2023 SEFA. Context: During our testing of 40 payroll transactions, we found one instance of 2022 fringe benefits being charged to a federal program in 2023. In addition, during our testing of 40 general disbursements transactions, we identified four instances of 2022 costs being charged to federal programs in 2023. Questioned costs: Known amounts of 2022 costs included in the 2023 SEFA was $3,214. (ALNs: 47.041, 47.083, 93.866, and 10.310 Award Numbers: 1663642, 1757324, R01AG059923, and 2022-67020-36410) Cause: Per the University, the cause for the five exceptions were due to: The one payroll exception was due to the 2021-2022 Human Capital Management (HCM) implementation and the issues that implementation brought about. As disclosed in a direct communication with the University’s cognizant agency, the initial custom software used for the allocation of fringe benefit costs did not work appropriately. As a result, throughout 2022, the University dedicated significant resources to address the HCM shortcomings. Then, in 2023, various corrections were made (again, as disclosed to the cognizant agency.) This sample was one of those costs that was identified as not properly being allocated to the federal program in the prior year; thus, was charged to the federal government in the current fiscal year. Three of the four general disbursement exceptions related to the University’s procurement card accrual policy. Currently, the University’s accrues for procurement card purchases through June 23, which leaves seven days of activity that flows into the next fiscal year. Three of our samples relate to procurement card charges incurred during these seven days. The last of the four general disbursements that related to a prior year but reported in the Fiscal Year 2023 was due to a staffing issue. A key employee responsible for monitoring specific departmental charges fell ill and was out for a period of time. Upon the employee’s return, the employee spent time analyzing charges and identified the cost that should have been recorded as a federal charge in the prior year; thus, then charged the federal agency in Fiscal Year 2023. Effect: The University was out of compliance as it relates to identifying and reporting federal costs in the period incurred. Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the University evaluate its cutoff procedures to ensure federal costs are identified and reported in the correct fiscal year. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding and has developed a plan to correct the finding.
Criteria or specific requirement: Entities receiving federal awards must identify in its accounts all federal awards expended and report those amounts on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards for the period the federal award was expensed. Specifically, in accordance with Uniform Administrative Requirements outlined in 2 CFR 200, the guidance states: Per 2 CFR 200.502, The determination of when a Federal award is expended must be based on when the activity related to the Federal award occurs. Per 2 CFR 200.303, entities must establish and maintain internal controls which provide reasonable assurance that federal award expenditures are in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In addition, per 2 CFR 200.510, the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) must be prepared to reflect the awards for the period covered by the auditee’s financial statements. Lastly, section 2 CFR 200.510 states that for costs to be allowable, they should be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (with exceptions provided in that part). Condition: The University’s year-end cutoff controls allowed for certain costs from Fiscal Year 2022 to not be reported in the Fiscal Year 2022 SEFA but rather reported in the Fiscal Year 2023 SEFA. Context: During our testing of 40 payroll transactions, we found one instance of 2022 fringe benefits being charged to a federal program in 2023. In addition, during our testing of 40 general disbursements transactions, we identified four instances of 2022 costs being charged to federal programs in 2023. Questioned costs: Known amounts of 2022 costs included in the 2023 SEFA was $3,214. (ALNs: 47.041, 47.083, 93.866, and 10.310 Award Numbers: 1663642, 1757324, R01AG059923, and 2022-67020-36410) Cause: Per the University, the cause for the five exceptions were due to: The one payroll exception was due to the 2021-2022 Human Capital Management (HCM) implementation and the issues that implementation brought about. As disclosed in a direct communication with the University’s cognizant agency, the initial custom software used for the allocation of fringe benefit costs did not work appropriately. As a result, throughout 2022, the University dedicated significant resources to address the HCM shortcomings. Then, in 2023, various corrections were made (again, as disclosed to the cognizant agency.) This sample was one of those costs that was identified as not properly being allocated to the federal program in the prior year; thus, was charged to the federal government in the current fiscal year. Three of the four general disbursement exceptions related to the University’s procurement card accrual policy. Currently, the University’s accrues for procurement card purchases through June 23, which leaves seven days of activity that flows into the next fiscal year. Three of our samples relate to procurement card charges incurred during these seven days. The last of the four general disbursements that related to a prior year but reported in the Fiscal Year 2023 was due to a staffing issue. A key employee responsible for monitoring specific departmental charges fell ill and was out for a period of time. Upon the employee’s return, the employee spent time analyzing charges and identified the cost that should have been recorded as a federal charge in the prior year; thus, then charged the federal agency in Fiscal Year 2023. Effect: The University was out of compliance as it relates to identifying and reporting federal costs in the period incurred. Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the University evaluate its cutoff procedures to ensure federal costs are identified and reported in the correct fiscal year. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding and has developed a plan to correct the finding.
Criteria or specific requirement: Entities receiving federal awards must identify in its accounts all federal awards expended and report those amounts on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards for the period the federal award was expensed. Specifically, in accordance with Uniform Administrative Requirements outlined in 2 CFR 200, the guidance states: Per 2 CFR 200.502, The determination of when a Federal award is expended must be based on when the activity related to the Federal award occurs. Per 2 CFR 200.303, entities must establish and maintain internal controls which provide reasonable assurance that federal award expenditures are in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In addition, per 2 CFR 200.510, the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) must be prepared to reflect the awards for the period covered by the auditee’s financial statements. Lastly, section 2 CFR 200.510 states that for costs to be allowable, they should be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (with exceptions provided in that part). Condition: The University’s year-end cutoff controls allowed for certain costs from Fiscal Year 2022 to not be reported in the Fiscal Year 2022 SEFA but rather reported in the Fiscal Year 2023 SEFA. Context: During our testing of 40 payroll transactions, we found one instance of 2022 fringe benefits being charged to a federal program in 2023. In addition, during our testing of 40 general disbursements transactions, we identified four instances of 2022 costs being charged to federal programs in 2023. Questioned costs: Known amounts of 2022 costs included in the 2023 SEFA was $3,214. (ALNs: 47.041, 47.083, 93.866, and 10.310 Award Numbers: 1663642, 1757324, R01AG059923, and 2022-67020-36410) Cause: Per the University, the cause for the five exceptions were due to: The one payroll exception was due to the 2021-2022 Human Capital Management (HCM) implementation and the issues that implementation brought about. As disclosed in a direct communication with the University’s cognizant agency, the initial custom software used for the allocation of fringe benefit costs did not work appropriately. As a result, throughout 2022, the University dedicated significant resources to address the HCM shortcomings. Then, in 2023, various corrections were made (again, as disclosed to the cognizant agency.) This sample was one of those costs that was identified as not properly being allocated to the federal program in the prior year; thus, was charged to the federal government in the current fiscal year. Three of the four general disbursement exceptions related to the University’s procurement card accrual policy. Currently, the University’s accrues for procurement card purchases through June 23, which leaves seven days of activity that flows into the next fiscal year. Three of our samples relate to procurement card charges incurred during these seven days. The last of the four general disbursements that related to a prior year but reported in the Fiscal Year 2023 was due to a staffing issue. A key employee responsible for monitoring specific departmental charges fell ill and was out for a period of time. Upon the employee’s return, the employee spent time analyzing charges and identified the cost that should have been recorded as a federal charge in the prior year; thus, then charged the federal agency in Fiscal Year 2023. Effect: The University was out of compliance as it relates to identifying and reporting federal costs in the period incurred. Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the University evaluate its cutoff procedures to ensure federal costs are identified and reported in the correct fiscal year. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding and has developed a plan to correct the finding.
Criteria or specific requirement: Entities receiving federal awards must identify in its accounts all federal awards expended and report those amounts on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards for the period the federal award was expensed. Specifically, in accordance with Uniform Administrative Requirements outlined in 2 CFR 200, the guidance states: Per 2 CFR 200.502, The determination of when a Federal award is expended must be based on when the activity related to the Federal award occurs. Per 2 CFR 200.303, entities must establish and maintain internal controls which provide reasonable assurance that federal award expenditures are in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In addition, per 2 CFR 200.510, the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) must be prepared to reflect the awards for the period covered by the auditee’s financial statements. Lastly, section 2 CFR 200.510 states that for costs to be allowable, they should be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (with exceptions provided in that part). Condition: The University’s year-end cutoff controls allowed for certain costs from Fiscal Year 2022 to not be reported in the Fiscal Year 2022 SEFA but rather reported in the Fiscal Year 2023 SEFA. Context: During our testing of 40 payroll transactions, we found one instance of 2022 fringe benefits being charged to a federal program in 2023. In addition, during our testing of 40 general disbursements transactions, we identified four instances of 2022 costs being charged to federal programs in 2023. Questioned costs: Known amounts of 2022 costs included in the 2023 SEFA was $3,214. (ALNs: 47.041, 47.083, 93.866, and 10.310 Award Numbers: 1663642, 1757324, R01AG059923, and 2022-67020-36410) Cause: Per the University, the cause for the five exceptions were due to: The one payroll exception was due to the 2021-2022 Human Capital Management (HCM) implementation and the issues that implementation brought about. As disclosed in a direct communication with the University’s cognizant agency, the initial custom software used for the allocation of fringe benefit costs did not work appropriately. As a result, throughout 2022, the University dedicated significant resources to address the HCM shortcomings. Then, in 2023, various corrections were made (again, as disclosed to the cognizant agency.) This sample was one of those costs that was identified as not properly being allocated to the federal program in the prior year; thus, was charged to the federal government in the current fiscal year. Three of the four general disbursement exceptions related to the University’s procurement card accrual policy. Currently, the University’s accrues for procurement card purchases through June 23, which leaves seven days of activity that flows into the next fiscal year. Three of our samples relate to procurement card charges incurred during these seven days. The last of the four general disbursements that related to a prior year but reported in the Fiscal Year 2023 was due to a staffing issue. A key employee responsible for monitoring specific departmental charges fell ill and was out for a period of time. Upon the employee’s return, the employee spent time analyzing charges and identified the cost that should have been recorded as a federal charge in the prior year; thus, then charged the federal agency in Fiscal Year 2023. Effect: The University was out of compliance as it relates to identifying and reporting federal costs in the period incurred. Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the University evaluate its cutoff procedures to ensure federal costs are identified and reported in the correct fiscal year. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding and has developed a plan to correct the finding.
Criteria or specific requirement: Entities receiving federal awards must identify in its accounts all federal awards expended and report those amounts on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards for the period the federal award was expensed. Specifically, in accordance with Uniform Administrative Requirements outlined in 2 CFR 200, the guidance states: Per 2 CFR 200.502, The determination of when a Federal award is expended must be based on when the activity related to the Federal award occurs. Per 2 CFR 200.303, entities must establish and maintain internal controls which provide reasonable assurance that federal award expenditures are in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In addition, per 2 CFR 200.510, the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) must be prepared to reflect the awards for the period covered by the auditee’s financial statements. Lastly, section 2 CFR 200.510 states that for costs to be allowable, they should be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (with exceptions provided in that part). Condition: The University’s year-end cutoff controls allowed for certain costs from Fiscal Year 2022 to not be reported in the Fiscal Year 2022 SEFA but rather reported in the Fiscal Year 2023 SEFA. Context: During our testing of 40 payroll transactions, we found one instance of 2022 fringe benefits being charged to a federal program in 2023. In addition, during our testing of 40 general disbursements transactions, we identified four instances of 2022 costs being charged to federal programs in 2023. Questioned costs: Known amounts of 2022 costs included in the 2023 SEFA was $3,214. (ALNs: 47.041, 47.083, 93.866, and 10.310 Award Numbers: 1663642, 1757324, R01AG059923, and 2022-67020-36410) Cause: Per the University, the cause for the five exceptions were due to: The one payroll exception was due to the 2021-2022 Human Capital Management (HCM) implementation and the issues that implementation brought about. As disclosed in a direct communication with the University’s cognizant agency, the initial custom software used for the allocation of fringe benefit costs did not work appropriately. As a result, throughout 2022, the University dedicated significant resources to address the HCM shortcomings. Then, in 2023, various corrections were made (again, as disclosed to the cognizant agency.) This sample was one of those costs that was identified as not properly being allocated to the federal program in the prior year; thus, was charged to the federal government in the current fiscal year. Three of the four general disbursement exceptions related to the University’s procurement card accrual policy. Currently, the University’s accrues for procurement card purchases through June 23, which leaves seven days of activity that flows into the next fiscal year. Three of our samples relate to procurement card charges incurred during these seven days. The last of the four general disbursements that related to a prior year but reported in the Fiscal Year 2023 was due to a staffing issue. A key employee responsible for monitoring specific departmental charges fell ill and was out for a period of time. Upon the employee’s return, the employee spent time analyzing charges and identified the cost that should have been recorded as a federal charge in the prior year; thus, then charged the federal agency in Fiscal Year 2023. Effect: The University was out of compliance as it relates to identifying and reporting federal costs in the period incurred. Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the University evaluate its cutoff procedures to ensure federal costs are identified and reported in the correct fiscal year. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding and has developed a plan to correct the finding.
Criteria or specific requirement: Entities receiving federal awards must identify in its accounts all federal awards expended and report those amounts on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards for the period the federal award was expensed. Specifically, in accordance with Uniform Administrative Requirements outlined in 2 CFR 200, the guidance states: Per 2 CFR 200.502, The determination of when a Federal award is expended must be based on when the activity related to the Federal award occurs. Per 2 CFR 200.303, entities must establish and maintain internal controls which provide reasonable assurance that federal award expenditures are in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In addition, per 2 CFR 200.510, the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) must be prepared to reflect the awards for the period covered by the auditee’s financial statements. Lastly, section 2 CFR 200.510 states that for costs to be allowable, they should be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (with exceptions provided in that part). Condition: The University’s year-end cutoff controls allowed for certain costs from Fiscal Year 2022 to not be reported in the Fiscal Year 2022 SEFA but rather reported in the Fiscal Year 2023 SEFA. Context: During our testing of 40 payroll transactions, we found one instance of 2022 fringe benefits being charged to a federal program in 2023. In addition, during our testing of 40 general disbursements transactions, we identified four instances of 2022 costs being charged to federal programs in 2023. Questioned costs: Known amounts of 2022 costs included in the 2023 SEFA was $3,214. (ALNs: 47.041, 47.083, 93.866, and 10.310 Award Numbers: 1663642, 1757324, R01AG059923, and 2022-67020-36410) Cause: Per the University, the cause for the five exceptions were due to: The one payroll exception was due to the 2021-2022 Human Capital Management (HCM) implementation and the issues that implementation brought about. As disclosed in a direct communication with the University’s cognizant agency, the initial custom software used for the allocation of fringe benefit costs did not work appropriately. As a result, throughout 2022, the University dedicated significant resources to address the HCM shortcomings. Then, in 2023, various corrections were made (again, as disclosed to the cognizant agency.) This sample was one of those costs that was identified as not properly being allocated to the federal program in the prior year; thus, was charged to the federal government in the current fiscal year. Three of the four general disbursement exceptions related to the University’s procurement card accrual policy. Currently, the University’s accrues for procurement card purchases through June 23, which leaves seven days of activity that flows into the next fiscal year. Three of our samples relate to procurement card charges incurred during these seven days. The last of the four general disbursements that related to a prior year but reported in the Fiscal Year 2023 was due to a staffing issue. A key employee responsible for monitoring specific departmental charges fell ill and was out for a period of time. Upon the employee’s return, the employee spent time analyzing charges and identified the cost that should have been recorded as a federal charge in the prior year; thus, then charged the federal agency in Fiscal Year 2023. Effect: The University was out of compliance as it relates to identifying and reporting federal costs in the period incurred. Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the University evaluate its cutoff procedures to ensure federal costs are identified and reported in the correct fiscal year. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding and has developed a plan to correct the finding.
Criteria or specific requirement: Entities receiving federal awards must identify in its accounts all federal awards expended and report those amounts on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards for the period the federal award was expensed. Specifically, in accordance with Uniform Administrative Requirements outlined in 2 CFR 200, the guidance states: Per 2 CFR 200.502, The determination of when a Federal award is expended must be based on when the activity related to the Federal award occurs. Per 2 CFR 200.303, entities must establish and maintain internal controls which provide reasonable assurance that federal award expenditures are in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In addition, per 2 CFR 200.510, the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) must be prepared to reflect the awards for the period covered by the auditee’s financial statements. Lastly, section 2 CFR 200.510 states that for costs to be allowable, they should be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (with exceptions provided in that part). Condition: The University’s year-end cutoff controls allowed for certain costs from Fiscal Year 2022 to not be reported in the Fiscal Year 2022 SEFA but rather reported in the Fiscal Year 2023 SEFA. Context: During our testing of 40 payroll transactions, we found one instance of 2022 fringe benefits being charged to a federal program in 2023. In addition, during our testing of 40 general disbursements transactions, we identified four instances of 2022 costs being charged to federal programs in 2023. Questioned costs: Known amounts of 2022 costs included in the 2023 SEFA was $3,214. (ALNs: 47.041, 47.083, 93.866, and 10.310 Award Numbers: 1663642, 1757324, R01AG059923, and 2022-67020-36410) Cause: Per the University, the cause for the five exceptions were due to: The one payroll exception was due to the 2021-2022 Human Capital Management (HCM) implementation and the issues that implementation brought about. As disclosed in a direct communication with the University’s cognizant agency, the initial custom software used for the allocation of fringe benefit costs did not work appropriately. As a result, throughout 2022, the University dedicated significant resources to address the HCM shortcomings. Then, in 2023, various corrections were made (again, as disclosed to the cognizant agency.) This sample was one of those costs that was identified as not properly being allocated to the federal program in the prior year; thus, was charged to the federal government in the current fiscal year. Three of the four general disbursement exceptions related to the University’s procurement card accrual policy. Currently, the University’s accrues for procurement card purchases through June 23, which leaves seven days of activity that flows into the next fiscal year. Three of our samples relate to procurement card charges incurred during these seven days. The last of the four general disbursements that related to a prior year but reported in the Fiscal Year 2023 was due to a staffing issue. A key employee responsible for monitoring specific departmental charges fell ill and was out for a period of time. Upon the employee’s return, the employee spent time analyzing charges and identified the cost that should have been recorded as a federal charge in the prior year; thus, then charged the federal agency in Fiscal Year 2023. Effect: The University was out of compliance as it relates to identifying and reporting federal costs in the period incurred. Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the University evaluate its cutoff procedures to ensure federal costs are identified and reported in the correct fiscal year. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding and has developed a plan to correct the finding.
Criteria or specific requirement: Entities receiving federal awards must identify in its accounts all federal awards expended and report those amounts on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards for the period the federal award was expensed. Specifically, in accordance with Uniform Administrative Requirements outlined in 2 CFR 200, the guidance states: Per 2 CFR 200.502, The determination of when a Federal award is expended must be based on when the activity related to the Federal award occurs. Per 2 CFR 200.303, entities must establish and maintain internal controls which provide reasonable assurance that federal award expenditures are in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In addition, per 2 CFR 200.510, the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) must be prepared to reflect the awards for the period covered by the auditee’s financial statements. Lastly, section 2 CFR 200.510 states that for costs to be allowable, they should be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (with exceptions provided in that part). Condition: The University’s year-end cutoff controls allowed for certain costs from Fiscal Year 2022 to not be reported in the Fiscal Year 2022 SEFA but rather reported in the Fiscal Year 2023 SEFA. Context: During our testing of 40 payroll transactions, we found one instance of 2022 fringe benefits being charged to a federal program in 2023. In addition, during our testing of 40 general disbursements transactions, we identified four instances of 2022 costs being charged to federal programs in 2023. Questioned costs: Known amounts of 2022 costs included in the 2023 SEFA was $3,214. (ALNs: 47.041, 47.083, 93.866, and 10.310 Award Numbers: 1663642, 1757324, R01AG059923, and 2022-67020-36410) Cause: Per the University, the cause for the five exceptions were due to: The one payroll exception was due to the 2021-2022 Human Capital Management (HCM) implementation and the issues that implementation brought about. As disclosed in a direct communication with the University’s cognizant agency, the initial custom software used for the allocation of fringe benefit costs did not work appropriately. As a result, throughout 2022, the University dedicated significant resources to address the HCM shortcomings. Then, in 2023, various corrections were made (again, as disclosed to the cognizant agency.) This sample was one of those costs that was identified as not properly being allocated to the federal program in the prior year; thus, was charged to the federal government in the current fiscal year. Three of the four general disbursement exceptions related to the University’s procurement card accrual policy. Currently, the University’s accrues for procurement card purchases through June 23, which leaves seven days of activity that flows into the next fiscal year. Three of our samples relate to procurement card charges incurred during these seven days. The last of the four general disbursements that related to a prior year but reported in the Fiscal Year 2023 was due to a staffing issue. A key employee responsible for monitoring specific departmental charges fell ill and was out for a period of time. Upon the employee’s return, the employee spent time analyzing charges and identified the cost that should have been recorded as a federal charge in the prior year; thus, then charged the federal agency in Fiscal Year 2023. Effect: The University was out of compliance as it relates to identifying and reporting federal costs in the period incurred. Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the University evaluate its cutoff procedures to ensure federal costs are identified and reported in the correct fiscal year. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding and has developed a plan to correct the finding.
Criteria or specific requirement: Entities receiving federal awards must identify in its accounts all federal awards expended and report those amounts on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards for the period the federal award was expensed. Specifically, in accordance with Uniform Administrative Requirements outlined in 2 CFR 200, the guidance states: Per 2 CFR 200.502, The determination of when a Federal award is expended must be based on when the activity related to the Federal award occurs. Per 2 CFR 200.303, entities must establish and maintain internal controls which provide reasonable assurance that federal award expenditures are in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In addition, per 2 CFR 200.510, the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) must be prepared to reflect the awards for the period covered by the auditee’s financial statements. Lastly, section 2 CFR 200.510 states that for costs to be allowable, they should be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (with exceptions provided in that part). Condition: The University’s year-end cutoff controls allowed for certain costs from Fiscal Year 2022 to not be reported in the Fiscal Year 2022 SEFA but rather reported in the Fiscal Year 2023 SEFA. Context: During our testing of 40 payroll transactions, we found one instance of 2022 fringe benefits being charged to a federal program in 2023. In addition, during our testing of 40 general disbursements transactions, we identified four instances of 2022 costs being charged to federal programs in 2023. Questioned costs: Known amounts of 2022 costs included in the 2023 SEFA was $3,214. (ALNs: 47.041, 47.083, 93.866, and 10.310 Award Numbers: 1663642, 1757324, R01AG059923, and 2022-67020-36410) Cause: Per the University, the cause for the five exceptions were due to: The one payroll exception was due to the 2021-2022 Human Capital Management (HCM) implementation and the issues that implementation brought about. As disclosed in a direct communication with the University’s cognizant agency, the initial custom software used for the allocation of fringe benefit costs did not work appropriately. As a result, throughout 2022, the University dedicated significant resources to address the HCM shortcomings. Then, in 2023, various corrections were made (again, as disclosed to the cognizant agency.) This sample was one of those costs that was identified as not properly being allocated to the federal program in the prior year; thus, was charged to the federal government in the current fiscal year. Three of the four general disbursement exceptions related to the University’s procurement card accrual policy. Currently, the University’s accrues for procurement card purchases through June 23, which leaves seven days of activity that flows into the next fiscal year. Three of our samples relate to procurement card charges incurred during these seven days. The last of the four general disbursements that related to a prior year but reported in the Fiscal Year 2023 was due to a staffing issue. A key employee responsible for monitoring specific departmental charges fell ill and was out for a period of time. Upon the employee’s return, the employee spent time analyzing charges and identified the cost that should have been recorded as a federal charge in the prior year; thus, then charged the federal agency in Fiscal Year 2023. Effect: The University was out of compliance as it relates to identifying and reporting federal costs in the period incurred. Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the University evaluate its cutoff procedures to ensure federal costs are identified and reported in the correct fiscal year. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding and has developed a plan to correct the finding.
Criteria or specific requirement: Entities receiving federal awards must identify in its accounts all federal awards expended and report those amounts on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards for the period the federal award was expensed. Specifically, in accordance with Uniform Administrative Requirements outlined in 2 CFR 200, the guidance states: Per 2 CFR 200.502, The determination of when a Federal award is expended must be based on when the activity related to the Federal award occurs. Per 2 CFR 200.303, entities must establish and maintain internal controls which provide reasonable assurance that federal award expenditures are in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In addition, per 2 CFR 200.510, the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) must be prepared to reflect the awards for the period covered by the auditee’s financial statements. Lastly, section 2 CFR 200.510 states that for costs to be allowable, they should be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (with exceptions provided in that part). Condition: The University’s year-end cutoff controls allowed for certain costs from Fiscal Year 2022 to not be reported in the Fiscal Year 2022 SEFA but rather reported in the Fiscal Year 2023 SEFA. Context: During our testing of 40 payroll transactions, we found one instance of 2022 fringe benefits being charged to a federal program in 2023. In addition, during our testing of 40 general disbursements transactions, we identified four instances of 2022 costs being charged to federal programs in 2023. Questioned costs: Known amounts of 2022 costs included in the 2023 SEFA was $3,214. (ALNs: 47.041, 47.083, 93.866, and 10.310 Award Numbers: 1663642, 1757324, R01AG059923, and 2022-67020-36410) Cause: Per the University, the cause for the five exceptions were due to: The one payroll exception was due to the 2021-2022 Human Capital Management (HCM) implementation and the issues that implementation brought about. As disclosed in a direct communication with the University’s cognizant agency, the initial custom software used for the allocation of fringe benefit costs did not work appropriately. As a result, throughout 2022, the University dedicated significant resources to address the HCM shortcomings. Then, in 2023, various corrections were made (again, as disclosed to the cognizant agency.) This sample was one of those costs that was identified as not properly being allocated to the federal program in the prior year; thus, was charged to the federal government in the current fiscal year. Three of the four general disbursement exceptions related to the University’s procurement card accrual policy. Currently, the University’s accrues for procurement card purchases through June 23, which leaves seven days of activity that flows into the next fiscal year. Three of our samples relate to procurement card charges incurred during these seven days. The last of the four general disbursements that related to a prior year but reported in the Fiscal Year 2023 was due to a staffing issue. A key employee responsible for monitoring specific departmental charges fell ill and was out for a period of time. Upon the employee’s return, the employee spent time analyzing charges and identified the cost that should have been recorded as a federal charge in the prior year; thus, then charged the federal agency in Fiscal Year 2023. Effect: The University was out of compliance as it relates to identifying and reporting federal costs in the period incurred. Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the University evaluate its cutoff procedures to ensure federal costs are identified and reported in the correct fiscal year. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding and has developed a plan to correct the finding.
Criteria or specific requirement: Entities receiving federal awards must identify in its accounts all federal awards expended and report those amounts on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards for the period the federal award was expensed. Specifically, in accordance with Uniform Administrative Requirements outlined in 2 CFR 200, the guidance states: Per 2 CFR 200.502, The determination of when a Federal award is expended must be based on when the activity related to the Federal award occurs. Per 2 CFR 200.303, entities must establish and maintain internal controls which provide reasonable assurance that federal award expenditures are in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In addition, per 2 CFR 200.510, the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) must be prepared to reflect the awards for the period covered by the auditee’s financial statements. Lastly, section 2 CFR 200.510 states that for costs to be allowable, they should be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (with exceptions provided in that part). Condition: The University’s year-end cutoff controls allowed for certain costs from Fiscal Year 2022 to not be reported in the Fiscal Year 2022 SEFA but rather reported in the Fiscal Year 2023 SEFA. Context: During our testing of 40 payroll transactions, we found one instance of 2022 fringe benefits being charged to a federal program in 2023. In addition, during our testing of 40 general disbursements transactions, we identified four instances of 2022 costs being charged to federal programs in 2023. Questioned costs: Known amounts of 2022 costs included in the 2023 SEFA was $3,214. (ALNs: 47.041, 47.083, 93.866, and 10.310 Award Numbers: 1663642, 1757324, R01AG059923, and 2022-67020-36410) Cause: Per the University, the cause for the five exceptions were due to: The one payroll exception was due to the 2021-2022 Human Capital Management (HCM) implementation and the issues that implementation brought about. As disclosed in a direct communication with the University’s cognizant agency, the initial custom software used for the allocation of fringe benefit costs did not work appropriately. As a result, throughout 2022, the University dedicated significant resources to address the HCM shortcomings. Then, in 2023, various corrections were made (again, as disclosed to the cognizant agency.) This sample was one of those costs that was identified as not properly being allocated to the federal program in the prior year; thus, was charged to the federal government in the current fiscal year. Three of the four general disbursement exceptions related to the University’s procurement card accrual policy. Currently, the University’s accrues for procurement card purchases through June 23, which leaves seven days of activity that flows into the next fiscal year. Three of our samples relate to procurement card charges incurred during these seven days. The last of the four general disbursements that related to a prior year but reported in the Fiscal Year 2023 was due to a staffing issue. A key employee responsible for monitoring specific departmental charges fell ill and was out for a period of time. Upon the employee’s return, the employee spent time analyzing charges and identified the cost that should have been recorded as a federal charge in the prior year; thus, then charged the federal agency in Fiscal Year 2023. Effect: The University was out of compliance as it relates to identifying and reporting federal costs in the period incurred. Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the University evaluate its cutoff procedures to ensure federal costs are identified and reported in the correct fiscal year. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding and has developed a plan to correct the finding.
Criteria or specific requirement: Entities receiving federal awards must identify in its accounts all federal awards expended and report those amounts on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards for the period the federal award was expensed. Specifically, in accordance with Uniform Administrative Requirements outlined in 2 CFR 200, the guidance states: Per 2 CFR 200.502, The determination of when a Federal award is expended must be based on when the activity related to the Federal award occurs. Per 2 CFR 200.303, entities must establish and maintain internal controls which provide reasonable assurance that federal award expenditures are in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In addition, per 2 CFR 200.510, the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) must be prepared to reflect the awards for the period covered by the auditee’s financial statements. Lastly, section 2 CFR 200.510 states that for costs to be allowable, they should be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (with exceptions provided in that part). Condition: The University’s year-end cutoff controls allowed for certain costs from Fiscal Year 2022 to not be reported in the Fiscal Year 2022 SEFA but rather reported in the Fiscal Year 2023 SEFA. Context: During our testing of 40 payroll transactions, we found one instance of 2022 fringe benefits being charged to a federal program in 2023. In addition, during our testing of 40 general disbursements transactions, we identified four instances of 2022 costs being charged to federal programs in 2023. Questioned costs: Known amounts of 2022 costs included in the 2023 SEFA was $3,214. (ALNs: 47.041, 47.083, 93.866, and 10.310 Award Numbers: 1663642, 1757324, R01AG059923, and 2022-67020-36410) Cause: Per the University, the cause for the five exceptions were due to: The one payroll exception was due to the 2021-2022 Human Capital Management (HCM) implementation and the issues that implementation brought about. As disclosed in a direct communication with the University’s cognizant agency, the initial custom software used for the allocation of fringe benefit costs did not work appropriately. As a result, throughout 2022, the University dedicated significant resources to address the HCM shortcomings. Then, in 2023, various corrections were made (again, as disclosed to the cognizant agency.) This sample was one of those costs that was identified as not properly being allocated to the federal program in the prior year; thus, was charged to the federal government in the current fiscal year. Three of the four general disbursement exceptions related to the University’s procurement card accrual policy. Currently, the University’s accrues for procurement card purchases through June 23, which leaves seven days of activity that flows into the next fiscal year. Three of our samples relate to procurement card charges incurred during these seven days. The last of the four general disbursements that related to a prior year but reported in the Fiscal Year 2023 was due to a staffing issue. A key employee responsible for monitoring specific departmental charges fell ill and was out for a period of time. Upon the employee’s return, the employee spent time analyzing charges and identified the cost that should have been recorded as a federal charge in the prior year; thus, then charged the federal agency in Fiscal Year 2023. Effect: The University was out of compliance as it relates to identifying and reporting federal costs in the period incurred. Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the University evaluate its cutoff procedures to ensure federal costs are identified and reported in the correct fiscal year. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding and has developed a plan to correct the finding.
Criteria or specific requirement: Entities receiving federal awards must identify in its accounts all federal awards expended and report those amounts on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards for the period the federal award was expensed. Specifically, in accordance with Uniform Administrative Requirements outlined in 2 CFR 200, the guidance states: Per 2 CFR 200.502, The determination of when a Federal award is expended must be based on when the activity related to the Federal award occurs. Per 2 CFR 200.303, entities must establish and maintain internal controls which provide reasonable assurance that federal award expenditures are in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In addition, per 2 CFR 200.510, the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) must be prepared to reflect the awards for the period covered by the auditee’s financial statements. Lastly, section 2 CFR 200.510 states that for costs to be allowable, they should be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (with exceptions provided in that part). Condition: The University’s year-end cutoff controls allowed for certain costs from Fiscal Year 2022 to not be reported in the Fiscal Year 2022 SEFA but rather reported in the Fiscal Year 2023 SEFA. Context: During our testing of 40 payroll transactions, we found one instance of 2022 fringe benefits being charged to a federal program in 2023. In addition, during our testing of 40 general disbursements transactions, we identified four instances of 2022 costs being charged to federal programs in 2023. Questioned costs: Known amounts of 2022 costs included in the 2023 SEFA was $3,214. (ALNs: 47.041, 47.083, 93.866, and 10.310 Award Numbers: 1663642, 1757324, R01AG059923, and 2022-67020-36410) Cause: Per the University, the cause for the five exceptions were due to: The one payroll exception was due to the 2021-2022 Human Capital Management (HCM) implementation and the issues that implementation brought about. As disclosed in a direct communication with the University’s cognizant agency, the initial custom software used for the allocation of fringe benefit costs did not work appropriately. As a result, throughout 2022, the University dedicated significant resources to address the HCM shortcomings. Then, in 2023, various corrections were made (again, as disclosed to the cognizant agency.) This sample was one of those costs that was identified as not properly being allocated to the federal program in the prior year; thus, was charged to the federal government in the current fiscal year. Three of the four general disbursement exceptions related to the University’s procurement card accrual policy. Currently, the University’s accrues for procurement card purchases through June 23, which leaves seven days of activity that flows into the next fiscal year. Three of our samples relate to procurement card charges incurred during these seven days. The last of the four general disbursements that related to a prior year but reported in the Fiscal Year 2023 was due to a staffing issue. A key employee responsible for monitoring specific departmental charges fell ill and was out for a period of time. Upon the employee’s return, the employee spent time analyzing charges and identified the cost that should have been recorded as a federal charge in the prior year; thus, then charged the federal agency in Fiscal Year 2023. Effect: The University was out of compliance as it relates to identifying and reporting federal costs in the period incurred. Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the University evaluate its cutoff procedures to ensure federal costs are identified and reported in the correct fiscal year. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding and has developed a plan to correct the finding.
Criteria or specific requirement: Entities receiving federal awards must identify in its accounts all federal awards expended and report those amounts on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards for the period the federal award was expensed. Specifically, in accordance with Uniform Administrative Requirements outlined in 2 CFR 200, the guidance states: Per 2 CFR 200.502, The determination of when a Federal award is expended must be based on when the activity related to the Federal award occurs. Per 2 CFR 200.303, entities must establish and maintain internal controls which provide reasonable assurance that federal award expenditures are in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In addition, per 2 CFR 200.510, the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) must be prepared to reflect the awards for the period covered by the auditee’s financial statements. Lastly, section 2 CFR 200.510 states that for costs to be allowable, they should be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (with exceptions provided in that part). Condition: The University’s year-end cutoff controls allowed for certain costs from Fiscal Year 2022 to not be reported in the Fiscal Year 2022 SEFA but rather reported in the Fiscal Year 2023 SEFA. Context: During our testing of 40 payroll transactions, we found one instance of 2022 fringe benefits being charged to a federal program in 2023. In addition, during our testing of 40 general disbursements transactions, we identified four instances of 2022 costs being charged to federal programs in 2023. Questioned costs: Known amounts of 2022 costs included in the 2023 SEFA was $3,214. (ALNs: 47.041, 47.083, 93.866, and 10.310 Award Numbers: 1663642, 1757324, R01AG059923, and 2022-67020-36410) Cause: Per the University, the cause for the five exceptions were due to: The one payroll exception was due to the 2021-2022 Human Capital Management (HCM) implementation and the issues that implementation brought about. As disclosed in a direct communication with the University’s cognizant agency, the initial custom software used for the allocation of fringe benefit costs did not work appropriately. As a result, throughout 2022, the University dedicated significant resources to address the HCM shortcomings. Then, in 2023, various corrections were made (again, as disclosed to the cognizant agency.) This sample was one of those costs that was identified as not properly being allocated to the federal program in the prior year; thus, was charged to the federal government in the current fiscal year. Three of the four general disbursement exceptions related to the University’s procurement card accrual policy. Currently, the University’s accrues for procurement card purchases through June 23, which leaves seven days of activity that flows into the next fiscal year. Three of our samples relate to procurement card charges incurred during these seven days. The last of the four general disbursements that related to a prior year but reported in the Fiscal Year 2023 was due to a staffing issue. A key employee responsible for monitoring specific departmental charges fell ill and was out for a period of time. Upon the employee’s return, the employee spent time analyzing charges and identified the cost that should have been recorded as a federal charge in the prior year; thus, then charged the federal agency in Fiscal Year 2023. Effect: The University was out of compliance as it relates to identifying and reporting federal costs in the period incurred. Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the University evaluate its cutoff procedures to ensure federal costs are identified and reported in the correct fiscal year. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding and has developed a plan to correct the finding.
Criteria or specific requirement: Entities receiving federal awards must identify in its accounts all federal awards expended and report those amounts on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards for the period the federal award was expensed. Specifically, in accordance with Uniform Administrative Requirements outlined in 2 CFR 200, the guidance states: Per 2 CFR 200.502, The determination of when a Federal award is expended must be based on when the activity related to the Federal award occurs. Per 2 CFR 200.303, entities must establish and maintain internal controls which provide reasonable assurance that federal award expenditures are in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In addition, per 2 CFR 200.510, the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) must be prepared to reflect the awards for the period covered by the auditee’s financial statements. Lastly, section 2 CFR 200.510 states that for costs to be allowable, they should be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (with exceptions provided in that part). Condition: The University’s year-end cutoff controls allowed for certain costs from Fiscal Year 2022 to not be reported in the Fiscal Year 2022 SEFA but rather reported in the Fiscal Year 2023 SEFA. Context: During our testing of 40 payroll transactions, we found one instance of 2022 fringe benefits being charged to a federal program in 2023. In addition, during our testing of 40 general disbursements transactions, we identified four instances of 2022 costs being charged to federal programs in 2023. Questioned costs: Known amounts of 2022 costs included in the 2023 SEFA was $3,214. (ALNs: 47.041, 47.083, 93.866, and 10.310 Award Numbers: 1663642, 1757324, R01AG059923, and 2022-67020-36410) Cause: Per the University, the cause for the five exceptions were due to: The one payroll exception was due to the 2021-2022 Human Capital Management (HCM) implementation and the issues that implementation brought about. As disclosed in a direct communication with the University’s cognizant agency, the initial custom software used for the allocation of fringe benefit costs did not work appropriately. As a result, throughout 2022, the University dedicated significant resources to address the HCM shortcomings. Then, in 2023, various corrections were made (again, as disclosed to the cognizant agency.) This sample was one of those costs that was identified as not properly being allocated to the federal program in the prior year; thus, was charged to the federal government in the current fiscal year. Three of the four general disbursement exceptions related to the University’s procurement card accrual policy. Currently, the University’s accrues for procurement card purchases through June 23, which leaves seven days of activity that flows into the next fiscal year. Three of our samples relate to procurement card charges incurred during these seven days. The last of the four general disbursements that related to a prior year but reported in the Fiscal Year 2023 was due to a staffing issue. A key employee responsible for monitoring specific departmental charges fell ill and was out for a period of time. Upon the employee’s return, the employee spent time analyzing charges and identified the cost that should have been recorded as a federal charge in the prior year; thus, then charged the federal agency in Fiscal Year 2023. Effect: The University was out of compliance as it relates to identifying and reporting federal costs in the period incurred. Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the University evaluate its cutoff procedures to ensure federal costs are identified and reported in the correct fiscal year. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding and has developed a plan to correct the finding.
Criteria or specific requirement: Entities receiving federal awards must identify in its accounts all federal awards expended and report those amounts on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards for the period the federal award was expensed. Specifically, in accordance with Uniform Administrative Requirements outlined in 2 CFR 200, the guidance states: Per 2 CFR 200.502, The determination of when a Federal award is expended must be based on when the activity related to the Federal award occurs. Per 2 CFR 200.303, entities must establish and maintain internal controls which provide reasonable assurance that federal award expenditures are in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In addition, per 2 CFR 200.510, the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) must be prepared to reflect the awards for the period covered by the auditee’s financial statements. Lastly, section 2 CFR 200.510 states that for costs to be allowable, they should be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (with exceptions provided in that part). Condition: The University’s year-end cutoff controls allowed for certain costs from Fiscal Year 2022 to not be reported in the Fiscal Year 2022 SEFA but rather reported in the Fiscal Year 2023 SEFA. Context: During our testing of 40 payroll transactions, we found one instance of 2022 fringe benefits being charged to a federal program in 2023. In addition, during our testing of 40 general disbursements transactions, we identified four instances of 2022 costs being charged to federal programs in 2023. Questioned costs: Known amounts of 2022 costs included in the 2023 SEFA was $3,214. (ALNs: 47.041, 47.083, 93.866, and 10.310 Award Numbers: 1663642, 1757324, R01AG059923, and 2022-67020-36410) Cause: Per the University, the cause for the five exceptions were due to: The one payroll exception was due to the 2021-2022 Human Capital Management (HCM) implementation and the issues that implementation brought about. As disclosed in a direct communication with the University’s cognizant agency, the initial custom software used for the allocation of fringe benefit costs did not work appropriately. As a result, throughout 2022, the University dedicated significant resources to address the HCM shortcomings. Then, in 2023, various corrections were made (again, as disclosed to the cognizant agency.) This sample was one of those costs that was identified as not properly being allocated to the federal program in the prior year; thus, was charged to the federal government in the current fiscal year. Three of the four general disbursement exceptions related to the University’s procurement card accrual policy. Currently, the University’s accrues for procurement card purchases through June 23, which leaves seven days of activity that flows into the next fiscal year. Three of our samples relate to procurement card charges incurred during these seven days. The last of the four general disbursements that related to a prior year but reported in the Fiscal Year 2023 was due to a staffing issue. A key employee responsible for monitoring specific departmental charges fell ill and was out for a period of time. Upon the employee’s return, the employee spent time analyzing charges and identified the cost that should have been recorded as a federal charge in the prior year; thus, then charged the federal agency in Fiscal Year 2023. Effect: The University was out of compliance as it relates to identifying and reporting federal costs in the period incurred. Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the University evaluate its cutoff procedures to ensure federal costs are identified and reported in the correct fiscal year. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding and has developed a plan to correct the finding.
Criteria or specific requirement: Entities receiving federal awards must identify in its accounts all federal awards expended and report those amounts on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards for the period the federal award was expensed. Specifically, in accordance with Uniform Administrative Requirements outlined in 2 CFR 200, the guidance states: Per 2 CFR 200.502, The determination of when a Federal award is expended must be based on when the activity related to the Federal award occurs. Per 2 CFR 200.303, entities must establish and maintain internal controls which provide reasonable assurance that federal award expenditures are in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In addition, per 2 CFR 200.510, the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) must be prepared to reflect the awards for the period covered by the auditee’s financial statements. Lastly, section 2 CFR 200.510 states that for costs to be allowable, they should be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (with exceptions provided in that part). Condition: The University’s year-end cutoff controls allowed for certain costs from Fiscal Year 2022 to not be reported in the Fiscal Year 2022 SEFA but rather reported in the Fiscal Year 2023 SEFA. Context: During our testing of 40 payroll transactions, we found one instance of 2022 fringe benefits being charged to a federal program in 2023. In addition, during our testing of 40 general disbursements transactions, we identified four instances of 2022 costs being charged to federal programs in 2023. Questioned costs: Known amounts of 2022 costs included in the 2023 SEFA was $3,214. (ALNs: 47.041, 47.083, 93.866, and 10.310 Award Numbers: 1663642, 1757324, R01AG059923, and 2022-67020-36410) Cause: Per the University, the cause for the five exceptions were due to: The one payroll exception was due to the 2021-2022 Human Capital Management (HCM) implementation and the issues that implementation brought about. As disclosed in a direct communication with the University’s cognizant agency, the initial custom software used for the allocation of fringe benefit costs did not work appropriately. As a result, throughout 2022, the University dedicated significant resources to address the HCM shortcomings. Then, in 2023, various corrections were made (again, as disclosed to the cognizant agency.) This sample was one of those costs that was identified as not properly being allocated to the federal program in the prior year; thus, was charged to the federal government in the current fiscal year. Three of the four general disbursement exceptions related to the University’s procurement card accrual policy. Currently, the University’s accrues for procurement card purchases through June 23, which leaves seven days of activity that flows into the next fiscal year. Three of our samples relate to procurement card charges incurred during these seven days. The last of the four general disbursements that related to a prior year but reported in the Fiscal Year 2023 was due to a staffing issue. A key employee responsible for monitoring specific departmental charges fell ill and was out for a period of time. Upon the employee’s return, the employee spent time analyzing charges and identified the cost that should have been recorded as a federal charge in the prior year; thus, then charged the federal agency in Fiscal Year 2023. Effect: The University was out of compliance as it relates to identifying and reporting federal costs in the period incurred. Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the University evaluate its cutoff procedures to ensure federal costs are identified and reported in the correct fiscal year. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding and has developed a plan to correct the finding.
Criteria or specific requirement: Entities receiving federal awards must identify in its accounts all federal awards expended and report those amounts on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards for the period the federal award was expensed. Specifically, in accordance with Uniform Administrative Requirements outlined in 2 CFR 200, the guidance states: Per 2 CFR 200.502, The determination of when a Federal award is expended must be based on when the activity related to the Federal award occurs. Per 2 CFR 200.303, entities must establish and maintain internal controls which provide reasonable assurance that federal award expenditures are in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In addition, per 2 CFR 200.510, the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) must be prepared to reflect the awards for the period covered by the auditee’s financial statements. Lastly, section 2 CFR 200.510 states that for costs to be allowable, they should be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (with exceptions provided in that part). Condition: The University’s year-end cutoff controls allowed for certain costs from Fiscal Year 2022 to not be reported in the Fiscal Year 2022 SEFA but rather reported in the Fiscal Year 2023 SEFA. Context: During our testing of 40 payroll transactions, we found one instance of 2022 fringe benefits being charged to a federal program in 2023. In addition, during our testing of 40 general disbursements transactions, we identified four instances of 2022 costs being charged to federal programs in 2023. Questioned costs: Known amounts of 2022 costs included in the 2023 SEFA was $3,214. (ALNs: 47.041, 47.083, 93.866, and 10.310 Award Numbers: 1663642, 1757324, R01AG059923, and 2022-67020-36410) Cause: Per the University, the cause for the five exceptions were due to: The one payroll exception was due to the 2021-2022 Human Capital Management (HCM) implementation and the issues that implementation brought about. As disclosed in a direct communication with the University’s cognizant agency, the initial custom software used for the allocation of fringe benefit costs did not work appropriately. As a result, throughout 2022, the University dedicated significant resources to address the HCM shortcomings. Then, in 2023, various corrections were made (again, as disclosed to the cognizant agency.) This sample was one of those costs that was identified as not properly being allocated to the federal program in the prior year; thus, was charged to the federal government in the current fiscal year. Three of the four general disbursement exceptions related to the University’s procurement card accrual policy. Currently, the University’s accrues for procurement card purchases through June 23, which leaves seven days of activity that flows into the next fiscal year. Three of our samples relate to procurement card charges incurred during these seven days. The last of the four general disbursements that related to a prior year but reported in the Fiscal Year 2023 was due to a staffing issue. A key employee responsible for monitoring specific departmental charges fell ill and was out for a period of time. Upon the employee’s return, the employee spent time analyzing charges and identified the cost that should have been recorded as a federal charge in the prior year; thus, then charged the federal agency in Fiscal Year 2023. Effect: The University was out of compliance as it relates to identifying and reporting federal costs in the period incurred. Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the University evaluate its cutoff procedures to ensure federal costs are identified and reported in the correct fiscal year. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding and has developed a plan to correct the finding.
Criteria or specific requirement: Entities receiving federal awards must identify in its accounts all federal awards expended and report those amounts on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards for the period the federal award was expensed. Specifically, in accordance with Uniform Administrative Requirements outlined in 2 CFR 200, the guidance states: Per 2 CFR 200.502, The determination of when a Federal award is expended must be based on when the activity related to the Federal award occurs. Per 2 CFR 200.303, entities must establish and maintain internal controls which provide reasonable assurance that federal award expenditures are in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In addition, per 2 CFR 200.510, the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) must be prepared to reflect the awards for the period covered by the auditee’s financial statements. Lastly, section 2 CFR 200.510 states that for costs to be allowable, they should be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (with exceptions provided in that part). Condition: The University’s year-end cutoff controls allowed for certain costs from Fiscal Year 2022 to not be reported in the Fiscal Year 2022 SEFA but rather reported in the Fiscal Year 2023 SEFA. Context: During our testing of 40 payroll transactions, we found one instance of 2022 fringe benefits being charged to a federal program in 2023. In addition, during our testing of 40 general disbursements transactions, we identified four instances of 2022 costs being charged to federal programs in 2023. Questioned costs: Known amounts of 2022 costs included in the 2023 SEFA was $3,214. (ALNs: 47.041, 47.083, 93.866, and 10.310 Award Numbers: 1663642, 1757324, R01AG059923, and 2022-67020-36410) Cause: Per the University, the cause for the five exceptions were due to: The one payroll exception was due to the 2021-2022 Human Capital Management (HCM) implementation and the issues that implementation brought about. As disclosed in a direct communication with the University’s cognizant agency, the initial custom software used for the allocation of fringe benefit costs did not work appropriately. As a result, throughout 2022, the University dedicated significant resources to address the HCM shortcomings. Then, in 2023, various corrections were made (again, as disclosed to the cognizant agency.) This sample was one of those costs that was identified as not properly being allocated to the federal program in the prior year; thus, was charged to the federal government in the current fiscal year. Three of the four general disbursement exceptions related to the University’s procurement card accrual policy. Currently, the University’s accrues for procurement card purchases through June 23, which leaves seven days of activity that flows into the next fiscal year. Three of our samples relate to procurement card charges incurred during these seven days. The last of the four general disbursements that related to a prior year but reported in the Fiscal Year 2023 was due to a staffing issue. A key employee responsible for monitoring specific departmental charges fell ill and was out for a period of time. Upon the employee’s return, the employee spent time analyzing charges and identified the cost that should have been recorded as a federal charge in the prior year; thus, then charged the federal agency in Fiscal Year 2023. Effect: The University was out of compliance as it relates to identifying and reporting federal costs in the period incurred. Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the University evaluate its cutoff procedures to ensure federal costs are identified and reported in the correct fiscal year. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding and has developed a plan to correct the finding.
Criteria or specific requirement: Entities receiving federal awards must identify in its accounts all federal awards expended and report those amounts on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards for the period the federal award was expensed. Specifically, in accordance with Uniform Administrative Requirements outlined in 2 CFR 200, the guidance states: Per 2 CFR 200.502, The determination of when a Federal award is expended must be based on when the activity related to the Federal award occurs. Per 2 CFR 200.303, entities must establish and maintain internal controls which provide reasonable assurance that federal award expenditures are in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In addition, per 2 CFR 200.510, the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) must be prepared to reflect the awards for the period covered by the auditee’s financial statements. Lastly, section 2 CFR 200.510 states that for costs to be allowable, they should be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (with exceptions provided in that part). Condition: The University’s year-end cutoff controls allowed for certain costs from Fiscal Year 2022 to not be reported in the Fiscal Year 2022 SEFA but rather reported in the Fiscal Year 2023 SEFA. Context: During our testing of 40 payroll transactions, we found one instance of 2022 fringe benefits being charged to a federal program in 2023. In addition, during our testing of 40 general disbursements transactions, we identified four instances of 2022 costs being charged to federal programs in 2023. Questioned costs: Known amounts of 2022 costs included in the 2023 SEFA was $3,214. (ALNs: 47.041, 47.083, 93.866, and 10.310 Award Numbers: 1663642, 1757324, R01AG059923, and 2022-67020-36410) Cause: Per the University, the cause for the five exceptions were due to: The one payroll exception was due to the 2021-2022 Human Capital Management (HCM) implementation and the issues that implementation brought about. As disclosed in a direct communication with the University’s cognizant agency, the initial custom software used for the allocation of fringe benefit costs did not work appropriately. As a result, throughout 2022, the University dedicated significant resources to address the HCM shortcomings. Then, in 2023, various corrections were made (again, as disclosed to the cognizant agency.) This sample was one of those costs that was identified as not properly being allocated to the federal program in the prior year; thus, was charged to the federal government in the current fiscal year. Three of the four general disbursement exceptions related to the University’s procurement card accrual policy. Currently, the University’s accrues for procurement card purchases through June 23, which leaves seven days of activity that flows into the next fiscal year. Three of our samples relate to procurement card charges incurred during these seven days. The last of the four general disbursements that related to a prior year but reported in the Fiscal Year 2023 was due to a staffing issue. A key employee responsible for monitoring specific departmental charges fell ill and was out for a period of time. Upon the employee’s return, the employee spent time analyzing charges and identified the cost that should have been recorded as a federal charge in the prior year; thus, then charged the federal agency in Fiscal Year 2023. Effect: The University was out of compliance as it relates to identifying and reporting federal costs in the period incurred. Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the University evaluate its cutoff procedures to ensure federal costs are identified and reported in the correct fiscal year. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding and has developed a plan to correct the finding.
Criteria or specific requirement: Entities receiving federal awards must identify in its accounts all federal awards expended and report those amounts on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards for the period the federal award was expensed. Specifically, in accordance with Uniform Administrative Requirements outlined in 2 CFR 200, the guidance states: Per 2 CFR 200.502, The determination of when a Federal award is expended must be based on when the activity related to the Federal award occurs. Per 2 CFR 200.303, entities must establish and maintain internal controls which provide reasonable assurance that federal award expenditures are in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In addition, per 2 CFR 200.510, the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) must be prepared to reflect the awards for the period covered by the auditee’s financial statements. Lastly, section 2 CFR 200.510 states that for costs to be allowable, they should be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (with exceptions provided in that part). Condition: The University’s year-end cutoff controls allowed for certain costs from Fiscal Year 2022 to not be reported in the Fiscal Year 2022 SEFA but rather reported in the Fiscal Year 2023 SEFA. Context: During our testing of 40 payroll transactions, we found one instance of 2022 fringe benefits being charged to a federal program in 2023. In addition, during our testing of 40 general disbursements transactions, we identified four instances of 2022 costs being charged to federal programs in 2023. Questioned costs: Known amounts of 2022 costs included in the 2023 SEFA was $3,214. (ALNs: 47.041, 47.083, 93.866, and 10.310 Award Numbers: 1663642, 1757324, R01AG059923, and 2022-67020-36410) Cause: Per the University, the cause for the five exceptions were due to: The one payroll exception was due to the 2021-2022 Human Capital Management (HCM) implementation and the issues that implementation brought about. As disclosed in a direct communication with the University’s cognizant agency, the initial custom software used for the allocation of fringe benefit costs did not work appropriately. As a result, throughout 2022, the University dedicated significant resources to address the HCM shortcomings. Then, in 2023, various corrections were made (again, as disclosed to the cognizant agency.) This sample was one of those costs that was identified as not properly being allocated to the federal program in the prior year; thus, was charged to the federal government in the current fiscal year. Three of the four general disbursement exceptions related to the University’s procurement card accrual policy. Currently, the University’s accrues for procurement card purchases through June 23, which leaves seven days of activity that flows into the next fiscal year. Three of our samples relate to procurement card charges incurred during these seven days. The last of the four general disbursements that related to a prior year but reported in the Fiscal Year 2023 was due to a staffing issue. A key employee responsible for monitoring specific departmental charges fell ill and was out for a period of time. Upon the employee’s return, the employee spent time analyzing charges and identified the cost that should have been recorded as a federal charge in the prior year; thus, then charged the federal agency in Fiscal Year 2023. Effect: The University was out of compliance as it relates to identifying and reporting federal costs in the period incurred. Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the University evaluate its cutoff procedures to ensure federal costs are identified and reported in the correct fiscal year. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding and has developed a plan to correct the finding.
Criteria or specific requirement: Entities receiving federal awards must identify in its accounts all federal awards expended and report those amounts on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards for the period the federal award was expensed. Specifically, in accordance with Uniform Administrative Requirements outlined in 2 CFR 200, the guidance states: Per 2 CFR 200.502, The determination of when a Federal award is expended must be based on when the activity related to the Federal award occurs. Per 2 CFR 200.303, entities must establish and maintain internal controls which provide reasonable assurance that federal award expenditures are in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In addition, per 2 CFR 200.510, the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) must be prepared to reflect the awards for the period covered by the auditee’s financial statements. Lastly, section 2 CFR 200.510 states that for costs to be allowable, they should be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (with exceptions provided in that part). Condition: The University’s year-end cutoff controls allowed for certain costs from Fiscal Year 2022 to not be reported in the Fiscal Year 2022 SEFA but rather reported in the Fiscal Year 2023 SEFA. Context: During our testing of 40 payroll transactions, we found one instance of 2022 fringe benefits being charged to a federal program in 2023. In addition, during our testing of 40 general disbursements transactions, we identified four instances of 2022 costs being charged to federal programs in 2023. Questioned costs: Known amounts of 2022 costs included in the 2023 SEFA was $3,214. (ALNs: 47.041, 47.083, 93.866, and 10.310 Award Numbers: 1663642, 1757324, R01AG059923, and 2022-67020-36410) Cause: Per the University, the cause for the five exceptions were due to: The one payroll exception was due to the 2021-2022 Human Capital Management (HCM) implementation and the issues that implementation brought about. As disclosed in a direct communication with the University’s cognizant agency, the initial custom software used for the allocation of fringe benefit costs did not work appropriately. As a result, throughout 2022, the University dedicated significant resources to address the HCM shortcomings. Then, in 2023, various corrections were made (again, as disclosed to the cognizant agency.) This sample was one of those costs that was identified as not properly being allocated to the federal program in the prior year; thus, was charged to the federal government in the current fiscal year. Three of the four general disbursement exceptions related to the University’s procurement card accrual policy. Currently, the University’s accrues for procurement card purchases through June 23, which leaves seven days of activity that flows into the next fiscal year. Three of our samples relate to procurement card charges incurred during these seven days. The last of the four general disbursements that related to a prior year but reported in the Fiscal Year 2023 was due to a staffing issue. A key employee responsible for monitoring specific departmental charges fell ill and was out for a period of time. Upon the employee’s return, the employee spent time analyzing charges and identified the cost that should have been recorded as a federal charge in the prior year; thus, then charged the federal agency in Fiscal Year 2023. Effect: The University was out of compliance as it relates to identifying and reporting federal costs in the period incurred. Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the University evaluate its cutoff procedures to ensure federal costs are identified and reported in the correct fiscal year. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding and has developed a plan to correct the finding.
Criteria or specific requirement: Entities receiving federal awards must identify in its accounts all federal awards expended and report those amounts on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards for the period the federal award was expensed. Specifically, in accordance with Uniform Administrative Requirements outlined in 2 CFR 200, the guidance states: Per 2 CFR 200.502, The determination of when a Federal award is expended must be based on when the activity related to the Federal award occurs. Per 2 CFR 200.303, entities must establish and maintain internal controls which provide reasonable assurance that federal award expenditures are in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In addition, per 2 CFR 200.510, the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) must be prepared to reflect the awards for the period covered by the auditee’s financial statements. Lastly, section 2 CFR 200.510 states that for costs to be allowable, they should be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (with exceptions provided in that part). Condition: The University’s year-end cutoff controls allowed for certain costs from Fiscal Year 2022 to not be reported in the Fiscal Year 2022 SEFA but rather reported in the Fiscal Year 2023 SEFA. Context: During our testing of 40 payroll transactions, we found one instance of 2022 fringe benefits being charged to a federal program in 2023. In addition, during our testing of 40 general disbursements transactions, we identified four instances of 2022 costs being charged to federal programs in 2023. Questioned costs: Known amounts of 2022 costs included in the 2023 SEFA was $3,214. (ALNs: 47.041, 47.083, 93.866, and 10.310 Award Numbers: 1663642, 1757324, R01AG059923, and 2022-67020-36410) Cause: Per the University, the cause for the five exceptions were due to: The one payroll exception was due to the 2021-2022 Human Capital Management (HCM) implementation and the issues that implementation brought about. As disclosed in a direct communication with the University’s cognizant agency, the initial custom software used for the allocation of fringe benefit costs did not work appropriately. As a result, throughout 2022, the University dedicated significant resources to address the HCM shortcomings. Then, in 2023, various corrections were made (again, as disclosed to the cognizant agency.) This sample was one of those costs that was identified as not properly being allocated to the federal program in the prior year; thus, was charged to the federal government in the current fiscal year. Three of the four general disbursement exceptions related to the University’s procurement card accrual policy. Currently, the University’s accrues for procurement card purchases through June 23, which leaves seven days of activity that flows into the next fiscal year. Three of our samples relate to procurement card charges incurred during these seven days. The last of the four general disbursements that related to a prior year but reported in the Fiscal Year 2023 was due to a staffing issue. A key employee responsible for monitoring specific departmental charges fell ill and was out for a period of time. Upon the employee’s return, the employee spent time analyzing charges and identified the cost that should have been recorded as a federal charge in the prior year; thus, then charged the federal agency in Fiscal Year 2023. Effect: The University was out of compliance as it relates to identifying and reporting federal costs in the period incurred. Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the University evaluate its cutoff procedures to ensure federal costs are identified and reported in the correct fiscal year. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding and has developed a plan to correct the finding.
Criteria or specific requirement: Entities receiving federal awards must identify in its accounts all federal awards expended and report those amounts on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards for the period the federal award was expensed. Specifically, in accordance with Uniform Administrative Requirements outlined in 2 CFR 200, the guidance states: Per 2 CFR 200.502, The determination of when a Federal award is expended must be based on when the activity related to the Federal award occurs. Per 2 CFR 200.303, entities must establish and maintain internal controls which provide reasonable assurance that federal award expenditures are in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In addition, per 2 CFR 200.510, the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) must be prepared to reflect the awards for the period covered by the auditee’s financial statements. Lastly, section 2 CFR 200.510 states that for costs to be allowable, they should be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (with exceptions provided in that part). Condition: The University’s year-end cutoff controls allowed for certain costs from Fiscal Year 2022 to not be reported in the Fiscal Year 2022 SEFA but rather reported in the Fiscal Year 2023 SEFA. Context: During our testing of 40 payroll transactions, we found one instance of 2022 fringe benefits being charged to a federal program in 2023. In addition, during our testing of 40 general disbursements transactions, we identified four instances of 2022 costs being charged to federal programs in 2023. Questioned costs: Known amounts of 2022 costs included in the 2023 SEFA was $3,214. (ALNs: 47.041, 47.083, 93.866, and 10.310 Award Numbers: 1663642, 1757324, R01AG059923, and 2022-67020-36410) Cause: Per the University, the cause for the five exceptions were due to: The one payroll exception was due to the 2021-2022 Human Capital Management (HCM) implementation and the issues that implementation brought about. As disclosed in a direct communication with the University’s cognizant agency, the initial custom software used for the allocation of fringe benefit costs did not work appropriately. As a result, throughout 2022, the University dedicated significant resources to address the HCM shortcomings. Then, in 2023, various corrections were made (again, as disclosed to the cognizant agency.) This sample was one of those costs that was identified as not properly being allocated to the federal program in the prior year; thus, was charged to the federal government in the current fiscal year. Three of the four general disbursement exceptions related to the University’s procurement card accrual policy. Currently, the University’s accrues for procurement card purchases through June 23, which leaves seven days of activity that flows into the next fiscal year. Three of our samples relate to procurement card charges incurred during these seven days. The last of the four general disbursements that related to a prior year but reported in the Fiscal Year 2023 was due to a staffing issue. A key employee responsible for monitoring specific departmental charges fell ill and was out for a period of time. Upon the employee’s return, the employee spent time analyzing charges and identified the cost that should have been recorded as a federal charge in the prior year; thus, then charged the federal agency in Fiscal Year 2023. Effect: The University was out of compliance as it relates to identifying and reporting federal costs in the period incurred. Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the University evaluate its cutoff procedures to ensure federal costs are identified and reported in the correct fiscal year. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding and has developed a plan to correct the finding.
Criteria or specific requirement: Entities receiving federal awards must identify in its accounts all federal awards expended and report those amounts on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards for the period the federal award was expensed. Specifically, in accordance with Uniform Administrative Requirements outlined in 2 CFR 200, the guidance states: Per 2 CFR 200.502, The determination of when a Federal award is expended must be based on when the activity related to the Federal award occurs. Per 2 CFR 200.303, entities must establish and maintain internal controls which provide reasonable assurance that federal award expenditures are in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In addition, per 2 CFR 200.510, the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) must be prepared to reflect the awards for the period covered by the auditee’s financial statements. Lastly, section 2 CFR 200.510 states that for costs to be allowable, they should be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (with exceptions provided in that part). Condition: The University’s year-end cutoff controls allowed for certain costs from Fiscal Year 2022 to not be reported in the Fiscal Year 2022 SEFA but rather reported in the Fiscal Year 2023 SEFA. Context: During our testing of 40 payroll transactions, we found one instance of 2022 fringe benefits being charged to a federal program in 2023. In addition, during our testing of 40 general disbursements transactions, we identified four instances of 2022 costs being charged to federal programs in 2023. Questioned costs: Known amounts of 2022 costs included in the 2023 SEFA was $3,214. (ALNs: 47.041, 47.083, 93.866, and 10.310 Award Numbers: 1663642, 1757324, R01AG059923, and 2022-67020-36410) Cause: Per the University, the cause for the five exceptions were due to: The one payroll exception was due to the 2021-2022 Human Capital Management (HCM) implementation and the issues that implementation brought about. As disclosed in a direct communication with the University’s cognizant agency, the initial custom software used for the allocation of fringe benefit costs did not work appropriately. As a result, throughout 2022, the University dedicated significant resources to address the HCM shortcomings. Then, in 2023, various corrections were made (again, as disclosed to the cognizant agency.) This sample was one of those costs that was identified as not properly being allocated to the federal program in the prior year; thus, was charged to the federal government in the current fiscal year. Three of the four general disbursement exceptions related to the University’s procurement card accrual policy. Currently, the University’s accrues for procurement card purchases through June 23, which leaves seven days of activity that flows into the next fiscal year. Three of our samples relate to procurement card charges incurred during these seven days. The last of the four general disbursements that related to a prior year but reported in the Fiscal Year 2023 was due to a staffing issue. A key employee responsible for monitoring specific departmental charges fell ill and was out for a period of time. Upon the employee’s return, the employee spent time analyzing charges and identified the cost that should have been recorded as a federal charge in the prior year; thus, then charged the federal agency in Fiscal Year 2023. Effect: The University was out of compliance as it relates to identifying and reporting federal costs in the period incurred. Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the University evaluate its cutoff procedures to ensure federal costs are identified and reported in the correct fiscal year. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding and has developed a plan to correct the finding.
Criteria or specific requirement: Entities receiving federal awards must identify in its accounts all federal awards expended and report those amounts on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards for the period the federal award was expensed. Specifically, in accordance with Uniform Administrative Requirements outlined in 2 CFR 200, the guidance states: Per 2 CFR 200.502, The determination of when a Federal award is expended must be based on when the activity related to the Federal award occurs. Per 2 CFR 200.303, entities must establish and maintain internal controls which provide reasonable assurance that federal award expenditures are in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In addition, per 2 CFR 200.510, the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) must be prepared to reflect the awards for the period covered by the auditee’s financial statements. Lastly, section 2 CFR 200.510 states that for costs to be allowable, they should be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (with exceptions provided in that part). Condition: The University’s year-end cutoff controls allowed for certain costs from Fiscal Year 2022 to not be reported in the Fiscal Year 2022 SEFA but rather reported in the Fiscal Year 2023 SEFA. Context: During our testing of 40 payroll transactions, we found one instance of 2022 fringe benefits being charged to a federal program in 2023. In addition, during our testing of 40 general disbursements transactions, we identified four instances of 2022 costs being charged to federal programs in 2023. Questioned costs: Known amounts of 2022 costs included in the 2023 SEFA was $3,214. (ALNs: 47.041, 47.083, 93.866, and 10.310 Award Numbers: 1663642, 1757324, R01AG059923, and 2022-67020-36410) Cause: Per the University, the cause for the five exceptions were due to: The one payroll exception was due to the 2021-2022 Human Capital Management (HCM) implementation and the issues that implementation brought about. As disclosed in a direct communication with the University’s cognizant agency, the initial custom software used for the allocation of fringe benefit costs did not work appropriately. As a result, throughout 2022, the University dedicated significant resources to address the HCM shortcomings. Then, in 2023, various corrections were made (again, as disclosed to the cognizant agency.) This sample was one of those costs that was identified as not properly being allocated to the federal program in the prior year; thus, was charged to the federal government in the current fiscal year. Three of the four general disbursement exceptions related to the University’s procurement card accrual policy. Currently, the University’s accrues for procurement card purchases through June 23, which leaves seven days of activity that flows into the next fiscal year. Three of our samples relate to procurement card charges incurred during these seven days. The last of the four general disbursements that related to a prior year but reported in the Fiscal Year 2023 was due to a staffing issue. A key employee responsible for monitoring specific departmental charges fell ill and was out for a period of time. Upon the employee’s return, the employee spent time analyzing charges and identified the cost that should have been recorded as a federal charge in the prior year; thus, then charged the federal agency in Fiscal Year 2023. Effect: The University was out of compliance as it relates to identifying and reporting federal costs in the period incurred. Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the University evaluate its cutoff procedures to ensure federal costs are identified and reported in the correct fiscal year. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding and has developed a plan to correct the finding.
Criteria or specific requirement: Entities receiving federal awards must identify in its accounts all federal awards expended and report those amounts on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards for the period the federal award was expensed. Specifically, in accordance with Uniform Administrative Requirements outlined in 2 CFR 200, the guidance states: Per 2 CFR 200.502, The determination of when a Federal award is expended must be based on when the activity related to the Federal award occurs. Per 2 CFR 200.303, entities must establish and maintain internal controls which provide reasonable assurance that federal award expenditures are in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In addition, per 2 CFR 200.510, the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) must be prepared to reflect the awards for the period covered by the auditee’s financial statements. Lastly, section 2 CFR 200.510 states that for costs to be allowable, they should be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (with exceptions provided in that part). Condition: The University’s year-end cutoff controls allowed for certain costs from Fiscal Year 2022 to not be reported in the Fiscal Year 2022 SEFA but rather reported in the Fiscal Year 2023 SEFA. Context: During our testing of 40 payroll transactions, we found one instance of 2022 fringe benefits being charged to a federal program in 2023. In addition, during our testing of 40 general disbursements transactions, we identified four instances of 2022 costs being charged to federal programs in 2023. Questioned costs: Known amounts of 2022 costs included in the 2023 SEFA was $3,214. (ALNs: 47.041, 47.083, 93.866, and 10.310 Award Numbers: 1663642, 1757324, R01AG059923, and 2022-67020-36410) Cause: Per the University, the cause for the five exceptions were due to: The one payroll exception was due to the 2021-2022 Human Capital Management (HCM) implementation and the issues that implementation brought about. As disclosed in a direct communication with the University’s cognizant agency, the initial custom software used for the allocation of fringe benefit costs did not work appropriately. As a result, throughout 2022, the University dedicated significant resources to address the HCM shortcomings. Then, in 2023, various corrections were made (again, as disclosed to the cognizant agency.) This sample was one of those costs that was identified as not properly being allocated to the federal program in the prior year; thus, was charged to the federal government in the current fiscal year. Three of the four general disbursement exceptions related to the University’s procurement card accrual policy. Currently, the University’s accrues for procurement card purchases through June 23, which leaves seven days of activity that flows into the next fiscal year. Three of our samples relate to procurement card charges incurred during these seven days. The last of the four general disbursements that related to a prior year but reported in the Fiscal Year 2023 was due to a staffing issue. A key employee responsible for monitoring specific departmental charges fell ill and was out for a period of time. Upon the employee’s return, the employee spent time analyzing charges and identified the cost that should have been recorded as a federal charge in the prior year; thus, then charged the federal agency in Fiscal Year 2023. Effect: The University was out of compliance as it relates to identifying and reporting federal costs in the period incurred. Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the University evaluate its cutoff procedures to ensure federal costs are identified and reported in the correct fiscal year. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding and has developed a plan to correct the finding.
Criteria or specific requirement: Entities receiving federal awards must identify in its accounts all federal awards expended and report those amounts on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards for the period the federal award was expensed. Specifically, in accordance with Uniform Administrative Requirements outlined in 2 CFR 200, the guidance states: Per 2 CFR 200.502, The determination of when a Federal award is expended must be based on when the activity related to the Federal award occurs. Per 2 CFR 200.303, entities must establish and maintain internal controls which provide reasonable assurance that federal award expenditures are in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In addition, per 2 CFR 200.510, the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) must be prepared to reflect the awards for the period covered by the auditee’s financial statements. Lastly, section 2 CFR 200.510 states that for costs to be allowable, they should be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (with exceptions provided in that part). Condition: The University’s year-end cutoff controls allowed for certain costs from Fiscal Year 2022 to not be reported in the Fiscal Year 2022 SEFA but rather reported in the Fiscal Year 2023 SEFA. Context: During our testing of 40 payroll transactions, we found one instance of 2022 fringe benefits being charged to a federal program in 2023. In addition, during our testing of 40 general disbursements transactions, we identified four instances of 2022 costs being charged to federal programs in 2023. Questioned costs: Known amounts of 2022 costs included in the 2023 SEFA was $3,214. (ALNs: 47.041, 47.083, 93.866, and 10.310 Award Numbers: 1663642, 1757324, R01AG059923, and 2022-67020-36410) Cause: Per the University, the cause for the five exceptions were due to: The one payroll exception was due to the 2021-2022 Human Capital Management (HCM) implementation and the issues that implementation brought about. As disclosed in a direct communication with the University’s cognizant agency, the initial custom software used for the allocation of fringe benefit costs did not work appropriately. As a result, throughout 2022, the University dedicated significant resources to address the HCM shortcomings. Then, in 2023, various corrections were made (again, as disclosed to the cognizant agency.) This sample was one of those costs that was identified as not properly being allocated to the federal program in the prior year; thus, was charged to the federal government in the current fiscal year. Three of the four general disbursement exceptions related to the University’s procurement card accrual policy. Currently, the University’s accrues for procurement card purchases through June 23, which leaves seven days of activity that flows into the next fiscal year. Three of our samples relate to procurement card charges incurred during these seven days. The last of the four general disbursements that related to a prior year but reported in the Fiscal Year 2023 was due to a staffing issue. A key employee responsible for monitoring specific departmental charges fell ill and was out for a period of time. Upon the employee’s return, the employee spent time analyzing charges and identified the cost that should have been recorded as a federal charge in the prior year; thus, then charged the federal agency in Fiscal Year 2023. Effect: The University was out of compliance as it relates to identifying and reporting federal costs in the period incurred. Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the University evaluate its cutoff procedures to ensure federal costs are identified and reported in the correct fiscal year. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding and has developed a plan to correct the finding.
Criteria or specific requirement: Entities receiving federal awards must identify in its accounts all federal awards expended and report those amounts on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards for the period the federal award was expensed. Specifically, in accordance with Uniform Administrative Requirements outlined in 2 CFR 200, the guidance states: Per 2 CFR 200.502, The determination of when a Federal award is expended must be based on when the activity related to the Federal award occurs. Per 2 CFR 200.303, entities must establish and maintain internal controls which provide reasonable assurance that federal award expenditures are in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In addition, per 2 CFR 200.510, the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) must be prepared to reflect the awards for the period covered by the auditee’s financial statements. Lastly, section 2 CFR 200.510 states that for costs to be allowable, they should be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (with exceptions provided in that part). Condition: The University’s year-end cutoff controls allowed for certain costs from Fiscal Year 2022 to not be reported in the Fiscal Year 2022 SEFA but rather reported in the Fiscal Year 2023 SEFA. Context: During our testing of 40 payroll transactions, we found one instance of 2022 fringe benefits being charged to a federal program in 2023. In addition, during our testing of 40 general disbursements transactions, we identified four instances of 2022 costs being charged to federal programs in 2023. Questioned costs: Known amounts of 2022 costs included in the 2023 SEFA was $3,214. (ALNs: 47.041, 47.083, 93.866, and 10.310 Award Numbers: 1663642, 1757324, R01AG059923, and 2022-67020-36410) Cause: Per the University, the cause for the five exceptions were due to: The one payroll exception was due to the 2021-2022 Human Capital Management (HCM) implementation and the issues that implementation brought about. As disclosed in a direct communication with the University’s cognizant agency, the initial custom software used for the allocation of fringe benefit costs did not work appropriately. As a result, throughout 2022, the University dedicated significant resources to address the HCM shortcomings. Then, in 2023, various corrections were made (again, as disclosed to the cognizant agency.) This sample was one of those costs that was identified as not properly being allocated to the federal program in the prior year; thus, was charged to the federal government in the current fiscal year. Three of the four general disbursement exceptions related to the University’s procurement card accrual policy. Currently, the University’s accrues for procurement card purchases through June 23, which leaves seven days of activity that flows into the next fiscal year. Three of our samples relate to procurement card charges incurred during these seven days. The last of the four general disbursements that related to a prior year but reported in the Fiscal Year 2023 was due to a staffing issue. A key employee responsible for monitoring specific departmental charges fell ill and was out for a period of time. Upon the employee’s return, the employee spent time analyzing charges and identified the cost that should have been recorded as a federal charge in the prior year; thus, then charged the federal agency in Fiscal Year 2023. Effect: The University was out of compliance as it relates to identifying and reporting federal costs in the period incurred. Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the University evaluate its cutoff procedures to ensure federal costs are identified and reported in the correct fiscal year. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding and has developed a plan to correct the finding.
Criteria or specific requirement: Entities receiving federal awards must identify in its accounts all federal awards expended and report those amounts on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards for the period the federal award was expensed. Specifically, in accordance with Uniform Administrative Requirements outlined in 2 CFR 200, the guidance states: Per 2 CFR 200.502, The determination of when a Federal award is expended must be based on when the activity related to the Federal award occurs. Per 2 CFR 200.303, entities must establish and maintain internal controls which provide reasonable assurance that federal award expenditures are in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In addition, per 2 CFR 200.510, the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) must be prepared to reflect the awards for the period covered by the auditee’s financial statements. Lastly, section 2 CFR 200.510 states that for costs to be allowable, they should be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (with exceptions provided in that part). Condition: The University’s year-end cutoff controls allowed for certain costs from Fiscal Year 2022 to not be reported in the Fiscal Year 2022 SEFA but rather reported in the Fiscal Year 2023 SEFA. Context: During our testing of 40 payroll transactions, we found one instance of 2022 fringe benefits being charged to a federal program in 2023. In addition, during our testing of 40 general disbursements transactions, we identified four instances of 2022 costs being charged to federal programs in 2023. Questioned costs: Known amounts of 2022 costs included in the 2023 SEFA was $3,214. (ALNs: 47.041, 47.083, 93.866, and 10.310 Award Numbers: 1663642, 1757324, R01AG059923, and 2022-67020-36410) Cause: Per the University, the cause for the five exceptions were due to: The one payroll exception was due to the 2021-2022 Human Capital Management (HCM) implementation and the issues that implementation brought about. As disclosed in a direct communication with the University’s cognizant agency, the initial custom software used for the allocation of fringe benefit costs did not work appropriately. As a result, throughout 2022, the University dedicated significant resources to address the HCM shortcomings. Then, in 2023, various corrections were made (again, as disclosed to the cognizant agency.) This sample was one of those costs that was identified as not properly being allocated to the federal program in the prior year; thus, was charged to the federal government in the current fiscal year. Three of the four general disbursement exceptions related to the University’s procurement card accrual policy. Currently, the University’s accrues for procurement card purchases through June 23, which leaves seven days of activity that flows into the next fiscal year. Three of our samples relate to procurement card charges incurred during these seven days. The last of the four general disbursements that related to a prior year but reported in the Fiscal Year 2023 was due to a staffing issue. A key employee responsible for monitoring specific departmental charges fell ill and was out for a period of time. Upon the employee’s return, the employee spent time analyzing charges and identified the cost that should have been recorded as a federal charge in the prior year; thus, then charged the federal agency in Fiscal Year 2023. Effect: The University was out of compliance as it relates to identifying and reporting federal costs in the period incurred. Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the University evaluate its cutoff procedures to ensure federal costs are identified and reported in the correct fiscal year. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding and has developed a plan to correct the finding.
Criteria or specific requirement: Entities receiving federal awards must identify in its accounts all federal awards expended and report those amounts on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards for the period the federal award was expensed. Specifically, in accordance with Uniform Administrative Requirements outlined in 2 CFR 200, the guidance states: Per 2 CFR 200.502, The determination of when a Federal award is expended must be based on when the activity related to the Federal award occurs. Per 2 CFR 200.303, entities must establish and maintain internal controls which provide reasonable assurance that federal award expenditures are in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In addition, per 2 CFR 200.510, the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) must be prepared to reflect the awards for the period covered by the auditee’s financial statements. Lastly, section 2 CFR 200.510 states that for costs to be allowable, they should be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (with exceptions provided in that part). Condition: The University’s year-end cutoff controls allowed for certain costs from Fiscal Year 2022 to not be reported in the Fiscal Year 2022 SEFA but rather reported in the Fiscal Year 2023 SEFA. Context: During our testing of 40 payroll transactions, we found one instance of 2022 fringe benefits being charged to a federal program in 2023. In addition, during our testing of 40 general disbursements transactions, we identified four instances of 2022 costs being charged to federal programs in 2023. Questioned costs: Known amounts of 2022 costs included in the 2023 SEFA was $3,214. (ALNs: 47.041, 47.083, 93.866, and 10.310 Award Numbers: 1663642, 1757324, R01AG059923, and 2022-67020-36410) Cause: Per the University, the cause for the five exceptions were due to: The one payroll exception was due to the 2021-2022 Human Capital Management (HCM) implementation and the issues that implementation brought about. As disclosed in a direct communication with the University’s cognizant agency, the initial custom software used for the allocation of fringe benefit costs did not work appropriately. As a result, throughout 2022, the University dedicated significant resources to address the HCM shortcomings. Then, in 2023, various corrections were made (again, as disclosed to the cognizant agency.) This sample was one of those costs that was identified as not properly being allocated to the federal program in the prior year; thus, was charged to the federal government in the current fiscal year. Three of the four general disbursement exceptions related to the University’s procurement card accrual policy. Currently, the University’s accrues for procurement card purchases through June 23, which leaves seven days of activity that flows into the next fiscal year. Three of our samples relate to procurement card charges incurred during these seven days. The last of the four general disbursements that related to a prior year but reported in the Fiscal Year 2023 was due to a staffing issue. A key employee responsible for monitoring specific departmental charges fell ill and was out for a period of time. Upon the employee’s return, the employee spent time analyzing charges and identified the cost that should have been recorded as a federal charge in the prior year; thus, then charged the federal agency in Fiscal Year 2023. Effect: The University was out of compliance as it relates to identifying and reporting federal costs in the period incurred. Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the University evaluate its cutoff procedures to ensure federal costs are identified and reported in the correct fiscal year. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding and has developed a plan to correct the finding.
Criteria or specific requirement: Entities receiving federal awards must identify in its accounts all federal awards expended and report those amounts on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards for the period the federal award was expensed. Specifically, in accordance with Uniform Administrative Requirements outlined in 2 CFR 200, the guidance states: Per 2 CFR 200.502, The determination of when a Federal award is expended must be based on when the activity related to the Federal award occurs. Per 2 CFR 200.303, entities must establish and maintain internal controls which provide reasonable assurance that federal award expenditures are in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In addition, per 2 CFR 200.510, the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) must be prepared to reflect the awards for the period covered by the auditee’s financial statements. Lastly, section 2 CFR 200.510 states that for costs to be allowable, they should be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (with exceptions provided in that part). Condition: The University’s year-end cutoff controls allowed for certain costs from Fiscal Year 2022 to not be reported in the Fiscal Year 2022 SEFA but rather reported in the Fiscal Year 2023 SEFA. Context: During our testing of 40 payroll transactions, we found one instance of 2022 fringe benefits being charged to a federal program in 2023. In addition, during our testing of 40 general disbursements transactions, we identified four instances of 2022 costs being charged to federal programs in 2023. Questioned costs: Known amounts of 2022 costs included in the 2023 SEFA was $3,214. (ALNs: 47.041, 47.083, 93.866, and 10.310 Award Numbers: 1663642, 1757324, R01AG059923, and 2022-67020-36410) Cause: Per the University, the cause for the five exceptions were due to: The one payroll exception was due to the 2021-2022 Human Capital Management (HCM) implementation and the issues that implementation brought about. As disclosed in a direct communication with the University’s cognizant agency, the initial custom software used for the allocation of fringe benefit costs did not work appropriately. As a result, throughout 2022, the University dedicated significant resources to address the HCM shortcomings. Then, in 2023, various corrections were made (again, as disclosed to the cognizant agency.) This sample was one of those costs that was identified as not properly being allocated to the federal program in the prior year; thus, was charged to the federal government in the current fiscal year. Three of the four general disbursement exceptions related to the University’s procurement card accrual policy. Currently, the University’s accrues for procurement card purchases through June 23, which leaves seven days of activity that flows into the next fiscal year. Three of our samples relate to procurement card charges incurred during these seven days. The last of the four general disbursements that related to a prior year but reported in the Fiscal Year 2023 was due to a staffing issue. A key employee responsible for monitoring specific departmental charges fell ill and was out for a period of time. Upon the employee’s return, the employee spent time analyzing charges and identified the cost that should have been recorded as a federal charge in the prior year; thus, then charged the federal agency in Fiscal Year 2023. Effect: The University was out of compliance as it relates to identifying and reporting federal costs in the period incurred. Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the University evaluate its cutoff procedures to ensure federal costs are identified and reported in the correct fiscal year. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding and has developed a plan to correct the finding.
Criteria or specific requirement: Entities receiving federal awards must identify in its accounts all federal awards expended and report those amounts on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards for the period the federal award was expensed. Specifically, in accordance with Uniform Administrative Requirements outlined in 2 CFR 200, the guidance states: Per 2 CFR 200.502, The determination of when a Federal award is expended must be based on when the activity related to the Federal award occurs. Per 2 CFR 200.303, entities must establish and maintain internal controls which provide reasonable assurance that federal award expenditures are in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In addition, per 2 CFR 200.510, the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) must be prepared to reflect the awards for the period covered by the auditee’s financial statements. Lastly, section 2 CFR 200.510 states that for costs to be allowable, they should be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (with exceptions provided in that part). Condition: The University’s year-end cutoff controls allowed for certain costs from Fiscal Year 2022 to not be reported in the Fiscal Year 2022 SEFA but rather reported in the Fiscal Year 2023 SEFA. Context: During our testing of 40 payroll transactions, we found one instance of 2022 fringe benefits being charged to a federal program in 2023. In addition, during our testing of 40 general disbursements transactions, we identified four instances of 2022 costs being charged to federal programs in 2023. Questioned costs: Known amounts of 2022 costs included in the 2023 SEFA was $3,214. (ALNs: 47.041, 47.083, 93.866, and 10.310 Award Numbers: 1663642, 1757324, R01AG059923, and 2022-67020-36410) Cause: Per the University, the cause for the five exceptions were due to: The one payroll exception was due to the 2021-2022 Human Capital Management (HCM) implementation and the issues that implementation brought about. As disclosed in a direct communication with the University’s cognizant agency, the initial custom software used for the allocation of fringe benefit costs did not work appropriately. As a result, throughout 2022, the University dedicated significant resources to address the HCM shortcomings. Then, in 2023, various corrections were made (again, as disclosed to the cognizant agency.) This sample was one of those costs that was identified as not properly being allocated to the federal program in the prior year; thus, was charged to the federal government in the current fiscal year. Three of the four general disbursement exceptions related to the University’s procurement card accrual policy. Currently, the University’s accrues for procurement card purchases through June 23, which leaves seven days of activity that flows into the next fiscal year. Three of our samples relate to procurement card charges incurred during these seven days. The last of the four general disbursements that related to a prior year but reported in the Fiscal Year 2023 was due to a staffing issue. A key employee responsible for monitoring specific departmental charges fell ill and was out for a period of time. Upon the employee’s return, the employee spent time analyzing charges and identified the cost that should have been recorded as a federal charge in the prior year; thus, then charged the federal agency in Fiscal Year 2023. Effect: The University was out of compliance as it relates to identifying and reporting federal costs in the period incurred. Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the University evaluate its cutoff procedures to ensure federal costs are identified and reported in the correct fiscal year. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding and has developed a plan to correct the finding.