Finding 2024-025 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services AL No. 93.914 HIV Emergency Relief Project Grants Material Weakness in Internal Controls and Noncompliance over Subrecipient Monitoring Repeat Finding: Yes; 2023-021 Condition: For 6 out of 6 selections, we were unable to verify the subrecipient's active registration on SAM.gov. For 6 out of 6 selections, various information related to the funding source and the pass through entity is missing on the notice of award (E.g. FAIN number, UEI, CFDA and name of pass-through and indirect cost). For 3 out of 6 selections, there were either findings identified during site visit or on the fiscal year 2023 single audit report of the subrecipient. However, no documentation was provided to evidence follow-up or other documentation to ensure that the identified issues were resolved. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.303: Internal Control, The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR §25.300: (a) A recipient may not make a subaward to a subrecipient unless that subrecipient has obtained and provided to the recipient a unique entity identifier. Subrecipients are not required to complete full SAM registration to obtain a unique entity identifier. (b) A recipient must notify any potential subrecipients that the recipient cannot make a subaward unless the subrecipient has obtained a unique entity identifier as described in paragraph (a) of this section. According to 2 CFR §200.332, all pass-through entities must: (a) Ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the Federal award identification including the subrecipient's unique entity identifier, Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN), identification of whether the award is R&D and indirect cost rate for the Federal award. (b) Evaluate each subrecipient's risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring described in paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section, which may include consideration of such factors as: (1) The subrecipient's prior experience with the same or similar subawards; (2) The results of previous audits including whether or not the subrecipient receives a Single Audit. d) Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved. (f) Verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by 2 CFR § 200.331 when it is expected that the subrecipient's Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in § 200.501. Cause: BCHD did not have proper controls in place to ensure the subrecipient monitoring requirements of the grant were met. Effect: BCHD may not be in compliance with the subrecipient monitoring requirements of the grant. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend the City establish and implement controls to maintain compliance with subrecipient monitoring requirements. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Finding 2024-025 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services AL No. 93.914 HIV Emergency Relief Project Grants Material Weakness in Internal Controls and Noncompliance over Subrecipient Monitoring Repeat Finding: Yes; 2023-021 Condition: For 6 out of 6 selections, we were unable to verify the subrecipient's active registration on SAM.gov. For 6 out of 6 selections, various information related to the funding source and the pass through entity is missing on the notice of award (E.g. FAIN number, UEI, CFDA and name of pass-through and indirect cost). For 3 out of 6 selections, there were either findings identified during site visit or on the fiscal year 2023 single audit report of the subrecipient. However, no documentation was provided to evidence follow-up or other documentation to ensure that the identified issues were resolved. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.303: Internal Control, The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR §25.300: (a) A recipient may not make a subaward to a subrecipient unless that subrecipient has obtained and provided to the recipient a unique entity identifier. Subrecipients are not required to complete full SAM registration to obtain a unique entity identifier. (b) A recipient must notify any potential subrecipients that the recipient cannot make a subaward unless the subrecipient has obtained a unique entity identifier as described in paragraph (a) of this section. According to 2 CFR §200.332, all pass-through entities must: (a) Ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the Federal award identification including the subrecipient's unique entity identifier, Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN), identification of whether the award is R&D and indirect cost rate for the Federal award. (b) Evaluate each subrecipient's risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring described in paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section, which may include consideration of such factors as: (1) The subrecipient's prior experience with the same or similar subawards; (2) The results of previous audits including whether or not the subrecipient receives a Single Audit. d) Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved. (f) Verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by 2 CFR § 200.331 when it is expected that the subrecipient's Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in § 200.501. Cause: BCHD did not have proper controls in place to ensure the subrecipient monitoring requirements of the grant were met. Effect: BCHD may not be in compliance with the subrecipient monitoring requirements of the grant. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend the City establish and implement controls to maintain compliance with subrecipient monitoring requirements. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Finding 2024-025 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services AL No. 93.914 HIV Emergency Relief Project Grants Material Weakness in Internal Controls and Noncompliance over Subrecipient Monitoring Repeat Finding: Yes; 2023-021 Condition: For 6 out of 6 selections, we were unable to verify the subrecipient's active registration on SAM.gov. For 6 out of 6 selections, various information related to the funding source and the pass through entity is missing on the notice of award (E.g. FAIN number, UEI, CFDA and name of pass-through and indirect cost). For 3 out of 6 selections, there were either findings identified during site visit or on the fiscal year 2023 single audit report of the subrecipient. However, no documentation was provided to evidence follow-up or other documentation to ensure that the identified issues were resolved. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.303: Internal Control, The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR §25.300: (a) A recipient may not make a subaward to a subrecipient unless that subrecipient has obtained and provided to the recipient a unique entity identifier. Subrecipients are not required to complete full SAM registration to obtain a unique entity identifier. (b) A recipient must notify any potential subrecipients that the recipient cannot make a subaward unless the subrecipient has obtained a unique entity identifier as described in paragraph (a) of this section. According to 2 CFR §200.332, all pass-through entities must: (a) Ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the Federal award identification including the subrecipient's unique entity identifier, Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN), identification of whether the award is R&D and indirect cost rate for the Federal award. (b) Evaluate each subrecipient's risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring described in paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section, which may include consideration of such factors as: (1) The subrecipient's prior experience with the same or similar subawards; (2) The results of previous audits including whether or not the subrecipient receives a Single Audit. d) Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved. (f) Verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by 2 CFR § 200.331 when it is expected that the subrecipient's Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in § 200.501. Cause: BCHD did not have proper controls in place to ensure the subrecipient monitoring requirements of the grant were met. Effect: BCHD may not be in compliance with the subrecipient monitoring requirements of the grant. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend the City establish and implement controls to maintain compliance with subrecipient monitoring requirements. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Finding 2024-025 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services AL No. 93.914 HIV Emergency Relief Project Grants Material Weakness in Internal Controls and Noncompliance over Subrecipient Monitoring Repeat Finding: Yes; 2023-021 Condition: For 6 out of 6 selections, we were unable to verify the subrecipient's active registration on SAM.gov. For 6 out of 6 selections, various information related to the funding source and the pass through entity is missing on the notice of award (E.g. FAIN number, UEI, CFDA and name of pass-through and indirect cost). For 3 out of 6 selections, there were either findings identified during site visit or on the fiscal year 2023 single audit report of the subrecipient. However, no documentation was provided to evidence follow-up or other documentation to ensure that the identified issues were resolved. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.303: Internal Control, The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR §25.300: (a) A recipient may not make a subaward to a subrecipient unless that subrecipient has obtained and provided to the recipient a unique entity identifier. Subrecipients are not required to complete full SAM registration to obtain a unique entity identifier. (b) A recipient must notify any potential subrecipients that the recipient cannot make a subaward unless the subrecipient has obtained a unique entity identifier as described in paragraph (a) of this section. According to 2 CFR §200.332, all pass-through entities must: (a) Ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the Federal award identification including the subrecipient's unique entity identifier, Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN), identification of whether the award is R&D and indirect cost rate for the Federal award. (b) Evaluate each subrecipient's risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring described in paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section, which may include consideration of such factors as: (1) The subrecipient's prior experience with the same or similar subawards; (2) The results of previous audits including whether or not the subrecipient receives a Single Audit. d) Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved. (f) Verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by 2 CFR § 200.331 when it is expected that the subrecipient's Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in § 200.501. Cause: BCHD did not have proper controls in place to ensure the subrecipient monitoring requirements of the grant were met. Effect: BCHD may not be in compliance with the subrecipient monitoring requirements of the grant. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend the City establish and implement controls to maintain compliance with subrecipient monitoring requirements. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Finding 2024-025 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services AL No. 93.914 HIV Emergency Relief Project Grants Material Weakness in Internal Controls and Noncompliance over Subrecipient Monitoring Repeat Finding: Yes; 2023-021 Condition: For 6 out of 6 selections, we were unable to verify the subrecipient's active registration on SAM.gov. For 6 out of 6 selections, various information related to the funding source and the pass through entity is missing on the notice of award (E.g. FAIN number, UEI, CFDA and name of pass-through and indirect cost). For 3 out of 6 selections, there were either findings identified during site visit or on the fiscal year 2023 single audit report of the subrecipient. However, no documentation was provided to evidence follow-up or other documentation to ensure that the identified issues were resolved. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.303: Internal Control, The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR §25.300: (a) A recipient may not make a subaward to a subrecipient unless that subrecipient has obtained and provided to the recipient a unique entity identifier. Subrecipients are not required to complete full SAM registration to obtain a unique entity identifier. (b) A recipient must notify any potential subrecipients that the recipient cannot make a subaward unless the subrecipient has obtained a unique entity identifier as described in paragraph (a) of this section. According to 2 CFR §200.332, all pass-through entities must: (a) Ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the Federal award identification including the subrecipient's unique entity identifier, Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN), identification of whether the award is R&D and indirect cost rate for the Federal award. (b) Evaluate each subrecipient's risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring described in paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section, which may include consideration of such factors as: (1) The subrecipient's prior experience with the same or similar subawards; (2) The results of previous audits including whether or not the subrecipient receives a Single Audit. d) Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved. (f) Verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by 2 CFR § 200.331 when it is expected that the subrecipient's Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in § 200.501. Cause: BCHD did not have proper controls in place to ensure the subrecipient monitoring requirements of the grant were met. Effect: BCHD may not be in compliance with the subrecipient monitoring requirements of the grant. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend the City establish and implement controls to maintain compliance with subrecipient monitoring requirements. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Finding 2024-025 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services AL No. 93.914 HIV Emergency Relief Project Grants Material Weakness in Internal Controls and Noncompliance over Subrecipient Monitoring Repeat Finding: Yes; 2023-021 Condition: For 6 out of 6 selections, we were unable to verify the subrecipient's active registration on SAM.gov. For 6 out of 6 selections, various information related to the funding source and the pass through entity is missing on the notice of award (E.g. FAIN number, UEI, CFDA and name of pass-through and indirect cost). For 3 out of 6 selections, there were either findings identified during site visit or on the fiscal year 2023 single audit report of the subrecipient. However, no documentation was provided to evidence follow-up or other documentation to ensure that the identified issues were resolved. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.303: Internal Control, The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR §25.300: (a) A recipient may not make a subaward to a subrecipient unless that subrecipient has obtained and provided to the recipient a unique entity identifier. Subrecipients are not required to complete full SAM registration to obtain a unique entity identifier. (b) A recipient must notify any potential subrecipients that the recipient cannot make a subaward unless the subrecipient has obtained a unique entity identifier as described in paragraph (a) of this section. According to 2 CFR §200.332, all pass-through entities must: (a) Ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the Federal award identification including the subrecipient's unique entity identifier, Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN), identification of whether the award is R&D and indirect cost rate for the Federal award. (b) Evaluate each subrecipient's risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring described in paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section, which may include consideration of such factors as: (1) The subrecipient's prior experience with the same or similar subawards; (2) The results of previous audits including whether or not the subrecipient receives a Single Audit. d) Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved. (f) Verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by 2 CFR § 200.331 when it is expected that the subrecipient's Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in § 200.501. Cause: BCHD did not have proper controls in place to ensure the subrecipient monitoring requirements of the grant were met. Effect: BCHD may not be in compliance with the subrecipient monitoring requirements of the grant. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend the City establish and implement controls to maintain compliance with subrecipient monitoring requirements. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Finding 2024-025 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services AL No. 93.914 HIV Emergency Relief Project Grants Material Weakness in Internal Controls and Noncompliance over Subrecipient Monitoring Repeat Finding: Yes; 2023-021 Condition: For 6 out of 6 selections, we were unable to verify the subrecipient's active registration on SAM.gov. For 6 out of 6 selections, various information related to the funding source and the pass through entity is missing on the notice of award (E.g. FAIN number, UEI, CFDA and name of pass-through and indirect cost). For 3 out of 6 selections, there were either findings identified during site visit or on the fiscal year 2023 single audit report of the subrecipient. However, no documentation was provided to evidence follow-up or other documentation to ensure that the identified issues were resolved. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.303: Internal Control, The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR §25.300: (a) A recipient may not make a subaward to a subrecipient unless that subrecipient has obtained and provided to the recipient a unique entity identifier. Subrecipients are not required to complete full SAM registration to obtain a unique entity identifier. (b) A recipient must notify any potential subrecipients that the recipient cannot make a subaward unless the subrecipient has obtained a unique entity identifier as described in paragraph (a) of this section. According to 2 CFR §200.332, all pass-through entities must: (a) Ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the Federal award identification including the subrecipient's unique entity identifier, Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN), identification of whether the award is R&D and indirect cost rate for the Federal award. (b) Evaluate each subrecipient's risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring described in paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section, which may include consideration of such factors as: (1) The subrecipient's prior experience with the same or similar subawards; (2) The results of previous audits including whether or not the subrecipient receives a Single Audit. d) Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved. (f) Verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by 2 CFR § 200.331 when it is expected that the subrecipient's Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in § 200.501. Cause: BCHD did not have proper controls in place to ensure the subrecipient monitoring requirements of the grant were met. Effect: BCHD may not be in compliance with the subrecipient monitoring requirements of the grant. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend the City establish and implement controls to maintain compliance with subrecipient monitoring requirements. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Finding 2024-025 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services AL No. 93.914 HIV Emergency Relief Project Grants Material Weakness in Internal Controls and Noncompliance over Subrecipient Monitoring Repeat Finding: Yes; 2023-021 Condition: For 6 out of 6 selections, we were unable to verify the subrecipient's active registration on SAM.gov. For 6 out of 6 selections, various information related to the funding source and the pass through entity is missing on the notice of award (E.g. FAIN number, UEI, CFDA and name of pass-through and indirect cost). For 3 out of 6 selections, there were either findings identified during site visit or on the fiscal year 2023 single audit report of the subrecipient. However, no documentation was provided to evidence follow-up or other documentation to ensure that the identified issues were resolved. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.303: Internal Control, The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR §25.300: (a) A recipient may not make a subaward to a subrecipient unless that subrecipient has obtained and provided to the recipient a unique entity identifier. Subrecipients are not required to complete full SAM registration to obtain a unique entity identifier. (b) A recipient must notify any potential subrecipients that the recipient cannot make a subaward unless the subrecipient has obtained a unique entity identifier as described in paragraph (a) of this section. According to 2 CFR §200.332, all pass-through entities must: (a) Ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the Federal award identification including the subrecipient's unique entity identifier, Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN), identification of whether the award is R&D and indirect cost rate for the Federal award. (b) Evaluate each subrecipient's risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring described in paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section, which may include consideration of such factors as: (1) The subrecipient's prior experience with the same or similar subawards; (2) The results of previous audits including whether or not the subrecipient receives a Single Audit. d) Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved. (f) Verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by 2 CFR § 200.331 when it is expected that the subrecipient's Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in § 200.501. Cause: BCHD did not have proper controls in place to ensure the subrecipient monitoring requirements of the grant were met. Effect: BCHD may not be in compliance with the subrecipient monitoring requirements of the grant. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend the City establish and implement controls to maintain compliance with subrecipient monitoring requirements. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Finding 2024-025 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services AL No. 93.914 HIV Emergency Relief Project Grants Material Weakness in Internal Controls and Noncompliance over Subrecipient Monitoring Repeat Finding: Yes; 2023-021 Condition: For 6 out of 6 selections, we were unable to verify the subrecipient's active registration on SAM.gov. For 6 out of 6 selections, various information related to the funding source and the pass through entity is missing on the notice of award (E.g. FAIN number, UEI, CFDA and name of pass-through and indirect cost). For 3 out of 6 selections, there were either findings identified during site visit or on the fiscal year 2023 single audit report of the subrecipient. However, no documentation was provided to evidence follow-up or other documentation to ensure that the identified issues were resolved. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.303: Internal Control, The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR §25.300: (a) A recipient may not make a subaward to a subrecipient unless that subrecipient has obtained and provided to the recipient a unique entity identifier. Subrecipients are not required to complete full SAM registration to obtain a unique entity identifier. (b) A recipient must notify any potential subrecipients that the recipient cannot make a subaward unless the subrecipient has obtained a unique entity identifier as described in paragraph (a) of this section. According to 2 CFR §200.332, all pass-through entities must: (a) Ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the Federal award identification including the subrecipient's unique entity identifier, Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN), identification of whether the award is R&D and indirect cost rate for the Federal award. (b) Evaluate each subrecipient's risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring described in paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section, which may include consideration of such factors as: (1) The subrecipient's prior experience with the same or similar subawards; (2) The results of previous audits including whether or not the subrecipient receives a Single Audit. d) Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved. (f) Verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by 2 CFR § 200.331 when it is expected that the subrecipient's Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in § 200.501. Cause: BCHD did not have proper controls in place to ensure the subrecipient monitoring requirements of the grant were met. Effect: BCHD may not be in compliance with the subrecipient monitoring requirements of the grant. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend the City establish and implement controls to maintain compliance with subrecipient monitoring requirements. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Finding 2024-025 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services AL No. 93.914 HIV Emergency Relief Project Grants Material Weakness in Internal Controls and Noncompliance over Subrecipient Monitoring Repeat Finding: Yes; 2023-021 Condition: For 6 out of 6 selections, we were unable to verify the subrecipient's active registration on SAM.gov. For 6 out of 6 selections, various information related to the funding source and the pass through entity is missing on the notice of award (E.g. FAIN number, UEI, CFDA and name of pass-through and indirect cost). For 3 out of 6 selections, there were either findings identified during site visit or on the fiscal year 2023 single audit report of the subrecipient. However, no documentation was provided to evidence follow-up or other documentation to ensure that the identified issues were resolved. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.303: Internal Control, The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR §25.300: (a) A recipient may not make a subaward to a subrecipient unless that subrecipient has obtained and provided to the recipient a unique entity identifier. Subrecipients are not required to complete full SAM registration to obtain a unique entity identifier. (b) A recipient must notify any potential subrecipients that the recipient cannot make a subaward unless the subrecipient has obtained a unique entity identifier as described in paragraph (a) of this section. According to 2 CFR §200.332, all pass-through entities must: (a) Ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the Federal award identification including the subrecipient's unique entity identifier, Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN), identification of whether the award is R&D and indirect cost rate for the Federal award. (b) Evaluate each subrecipient's risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring described in paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section, which may include consideration of such factors as: (1) The subrecipient's prior experience with the same or similar subawards; (2) The results of previous audits including whether or not the subrecipient receives a Single Audit. d) Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved. (f) Verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by 2 CFR § 200.331 when it is expected that the subrecipient's Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in § 200.501. Cause: BCHD did not have proper controls in place to ensure the subrecipient monitoring requirements of the grant were met. Effect: BCHD may not be in compliance with the subrecipient monitoring requirements of the grant. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend the City establish and implement controls to maintain compliance with subrecipient monitoring requirements. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Finding 2024-028 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services AL No. 93.940 HIV Prevention Activities Health Department Based Material Weakness in Internal Controls and Noncompliance over Subrecipient Monitoring Repeat Finding: Yes; 2023-024 Condition: For 1 out of 3 selections, management was unable to provide evidence that the Single Audit Report was reviewed. For 3 out of 3 selections, we were unable to verify the subrecipient's active registration on SAM.gov. For 3 out of 3 selections, various information related to the funding source and the pass-through entity is missing on the notice of award (E.g. FAIN number, UEI, CFDA and name of pass-through and indirect cost). Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR §200.303: The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR §25.300: (a) A recipient may not make a subaward to a subrecipient unless that subrecipient has obtained and provided to the recipient a unique entity identifier. Subrecipients are not required to complete full SAM registration to obtain a unique entity identifier. (b) A recipient must notify any potential subrecipients that the recipient cannot make a subaward unless the subrecipient has obtained a unique entity identifier as described in paragraph (a) of this section. According to 2 CFR §200.332, all pass-through entities must: (a) Ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the Federal award identification including the subrecipient's unique entity identifier, Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN), identification of whether the award is R&D and indirect cost rate for the Federal award. (b) Evaluate each subrecipient's risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring described in paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section, which may include consideration of such factors as: (1) The subrecipient's prior experience with the same or similar subawards; (2) The results of previous audits including whether or not the subrecipient receives a Single Audit. d) Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved. (f) Verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by 2 CFR § 200.331 when it is expected that the subrecipient's Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in § 200.501. Cause: BCHD did not have proper controls in place to ensure the subrecipient monitoring requirements of the grant were met. Effect: BCHD may not be in compliance with the subrecipient monitoring requirements of the grant. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend the City establish and implement controls to maintain compliance with subrecipient monitoring requirements. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Finding 2024-028 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services AL No. 93.940 HIV Prevention Activities Health Department Based Material Weakness in Internal Controls and Noncompliance over Subrecipient Monitoring Repeat Finding: Yes; 2023-024 Condition: For 1 out of 3 selections, management was unable to provide evidence that the Single Audit Report was reviewed. For 3 out of 3 selections, we were unable to verify the subrecipient's active registration on SAM.gov. For 3 out of 3 selections, various information related to the funding source and the pass-through entity is missing on the notice of award (E.g. FAIN number, UEI, CFDA and name of pass-through and indirect cost). Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR §200.303: The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR §25.300: (a) A recipient may not make a subaward to a subrecipient unless that subrecipient has obtained and provided to the recipient a unique entity identifier. Subrecipients are not required to complete full SAM registration to obtain a unique entity identifier. (b) A recipient must notify any potential subrecipients that the recipient cannot make a subaward unless the subrecipient has obtained a unique entity identifier as described in paragraph (a) of this section. According to 2 CFR §200.332, all pass-through entities must: (a) Ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the Federal award identification including the subrecipient's unique entity identifier, Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN), identification of whether the award is R&D and indirect cost rate for the Federal award. (b) Evaluate each subrecipient's risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring described in paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section, which may include consideration of such factors as: (1) The subrecipient's prior experience with the same or similar subawards; (2) The results of previous audits including whether or not the subrecipient receives a Single Audit. d) Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved. (f) Verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by 2 CFR § 200.331 when it is expected that the subrecipient's Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in § 200.501. Cause: BCHD did not have proper controls in place to ensure the subrecipient monitoring requirements of the grant were met. Effect: BCHD may not be in compliance with the subrecipient monitoring requirements of the grant. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend the City establish and implement controls to maintain compliance with subrecipient monitoring requirements. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Finding 2024-028 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services AL No. 93.940 HIV Prevention Activities Health Department Based Material Weakness in Internal Controls and Noncompliance over Subrecipient Monitoring Repeat Finding: Yes; 2023-024 Condition: For 1 out of 3 selections, management was unable to provide evidence that the Single Audit Report was reviewed. For 3 out of 3 selections, we were unable to verify the subrecipient's active registration on SAM.gov. For 3 out of 3 selections, various information related to the funding source and the pass-through entity is missing on the notice of award (E.g. FAIN number, UEI, CFDA and name of pass-through and indirect cost). Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR §200.303: The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR §25.300: (a) A recipient may not make a subaward to a subrecipient unless that subrecipient has obtained and provided to the recipient a unique entity identifier. Subrecipients are not required to complete full SAM registration to obtain a unique entity identifier. (b) A recipient must notify any potential subrecipients that the recipient cannot make a subaward unless the subrecipient has obtained a unique entity identifier as described in paragraph (a) of this section. According to 2 CFR §200.332, all pass-through entities must: (a) Ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the Federal award identification including the subrecipient's unique entity identifier, Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN), identification of whether the award is R&D and indirect cost rate for the Federal award. (b) Evaluate each subrecipient's risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring described in paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section, which may include consideration of such factors as: (1) The subrecipient's prior experience with the same or similar subawards; (2) The results of previous audits including whether or not the subrecipient receives a Single Audit. d) Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved. (f) Verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by 2 CFR § 200.331 when it is expected that the subrecipient's Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in § 200.501. Cause: BCHD did not have proper controls in place to ensure the subrecipient monitoring requirements of the grant were met. Effect: BCHD may not be in compliance with the subrecipient monitoring requirements of the grant. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend the City establish and implement controls to maintain compliance with subrecipient monitoring requirements. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Finding 2024-028 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services AL No. 93.940 HIV Prevention Activities Health Department Based Material Weakness in Internal Controls and Noncompliance over Subrecipient Monitoring Repeat Finding: Yes; 2023-024 Condition: For 1 out of 3 selections, management was unable to provide evidence that the Single Audit Report was reviewed. For 3 out of 3 selections, we were unable to verify the subrecipient's active registration on SAM.gov. For 3 out of 3 selections, various information related to the funding source and the pass-through entity is missing on the notice of award (E.g. FAIN number, UEI, CFDA and name of pass-through and indirect cost). Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR §200.303: The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR §25.300: (a) A recipient may not make a subaward to a subrecipient unless that subrecipient has obtained and provided to the recipient a unique entity identifier. Subrecipients are not required to complete full SAM registration to obtain a unique entity identifier. (b) A recipient must notify any potential subrecipients that the recipient cannot make a subaward unless the subrecipient has obtained a unique entity identifier as described in paragraph (a) of this section. According to 2 CFR §200.332, all pass-through entities must: (a) Ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the Federal award identification including the subrecipient's unique entity identifier, Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN), identification of whether the award is R&D and indirect cost rate for the Federal award. (b) Evaluate each subrecipient's risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring described in paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section, which may include consideration of such factors as: (1) The subrecipient's prior experience with the same or similar subawards; (2) The results of previous audits including whether or not the subrecipient receives a Single Audit. d) Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved. (f) Verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by 2 CFR § 200.331 when it is expected that the subrecipient's Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in § 200.501. Cause: BCHD did not have proper controls in place to ensure the subrecipient monitoring requirements of the grant were met. Effect: BCHD may not be in compliance with the subrecipient monitoring requirements of the grant. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend the City establish and implement controls to maintain compliance with subrecipient monitoring requirements. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Finding 2024-028 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services AL No. 93.940 HIV Prevention Activities Health Department Based Material Weakness in Internal Controls and Noncompliance over Subrecipient Monitoring Repeat Finding: Yes; 2023-024 Condition: For 1 out of 3 selections, management was unable to provide evidence that the Single Audit Report was reviewed. For 3 out of 3 selections, we were unable to verify the subrecipient's active registration on SAM.gov. For 3 out of 3 selections, various information related to the funding source and the pass-through entity is missing on the notice of award (E.g. FAIN number, UEI, CFDA and name of pass-through and indirect cost). Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR §200.303: The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR §25.300: (a) A recipient may not make a subaward to a subrecipient unless that subrecipient has obtained and provided to the recipient a unique entity identifier. Subrecipients are not required to complete full SAM registration to obtain a unique entity identifier. (b) A recipient must notify any potential subrecipients that the recipient cannot make a subaward unless the subrecipient has obtained a unique entity identifier as described in paragraph (a) of this section. According to 2 CFR §200.332, all pass-through entities must: (a) Ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the Federal award identification including the subrecipient's unique entity identifier, Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN), identification of whether the award is R&D and indirect cost rate for the Federal award. (b) Evaluate each subrecipient's risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring described in paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section, which may include consideration of such factors as: (1) The subrecipient's prior experience with the same or similar subawards; (2) The results of previous audits including whether or not the subrecipient receives a Single Audit. d) Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved. (f) Verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by 2 CFR § 200.331 when it is expected that the subrecipient's Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in § 200.501. Cause: BCHD did not have proper controls in place to ensure the subrecipient monitoring requirements of the grant were met. Effect: BCHD may not be in compliance with the subrecipient monitoring requirements of the grant. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend the City establish and implement controls to maintain compliance with subrecipient monitoring requirements. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Finding 2024-028 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services AL No. 93.940 HIV Prevention Activities Health Department Based Material Weakness in Internal Controls and Noncompliance over Subrecipient Monitoring Repeat Finding: Yes; 2023-024 Condition: For 1 out of 3 selections, management was unable to provide evidence that the Single Audit Report was reviewed. For 3 out of 3 selections, we were unable to verify the subrecipient's active registration on SAM.gov. For 3 out of 3 selections, various information related to the funding source and the pass-through entity is missing on the notice of award (E.g. FAIN number, UEI, CFDA and name of pass-through and indirect cost). Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR §200.303: The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR §25.300: (a) A recipient may not make a subaward to a subrecipient unless that subrecipient has obtained and provided to the recipient a unique entity identifier. Subrecipients are not required to complete full SAM registration to obtain a unique entity identifier. (b) A recipient must notify any potential subrecipients that the recipient cannot make a subaward unless the subrecipient has obtained a unique entity identifier as described in paragraph (a) of this section. According to 2 CFR §200.332, all pass-through entities must: (a) Ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the Federal award identification including the subrecipient's unique entity identifier, Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN), identification of whether the award is R&D and indirect cost rate for the Federal award. (b) Evaluate each subrecipient's risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring described in paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section, which may include consideration of such factors as: (1) The subrecipient's prior experience with the same or similar subawards; (2) The results of previous audits including whether or not the subrecipient receives a Single Audit. d) Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved. (f) Verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by 2 CFR § 200.331 when it is expected that the subrecipient's Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in § 200.501. Cause: BCHD did not have proper controls in place to ensure the subrecipient monitoring requirements of the grant were met. Effect: BCHD may not be in compliance with the subrecipient monitoring requirements of the grant. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend the City establish and implement controls to maintain compliance with subrecipient monitoring requirements. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Finding 2024-028 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services AL No. 93.940 HIV Prevention Activities Health Department Based Material Weakness in Internal Controls and Noncompliance over Subrecipient Monitoring Repeat Finding: Yes; 2023-024 Condition: For 1 out of 3 selections, management was unable to provide evidence that the Single Audit Report was reviewed. For 3 out of 3 selections, we were unable to verify the subrecipient's active registration on SAM.gov. For 3 out of 3 selections, various information related to the funding source and the pass-through entity is missing on the notice of award (E.g. FAIN number, UEI, CFDA and name of pass-through and indirect cost). Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR §200.303: The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR §25.300: (a) A recipient may not make a subaward to a subrecipient unless that subrecipient has obtained and provided to the recipient a unique entity identifier. Subrecipients are not required to complete full SAM registration to obtain a unique entity identifier. (b) A recipient must notify any potential subrecipients that the recipient cannot make a subaward unless the subrecipient has obtained a unique entity identifier as described in paragraph (a) of this section. According to 2 CFR §200.332, all pass-through entities must: (a) Ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the Federal award identification including the subrecipient's unique entity identifier, Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN), identification of whether the award is R&D and indirect cost rate for the Federal award. (b) Evaluate each subrecipient's risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring described in paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section, which may include consideration of such factors as: (1) The subrecipient's prior experience with the same or similar subawards; (2) The results of previous audits including whether or not the subrecipient receives a Single Audit. d) Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved. (f) Verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by 2 CFR § 200.331 when it is expected that the subrecipient's Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in § 200.501. Cause: BCHD did not have proper controls in place to ensure the subrecipient monitoring requirements of the grant were met. Effect: BCHD may not be in compliance with the subrecipient monitoring requirements of the grant. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend the City establish and implement controls to maintain compliance with subrecipient monitoring requirements. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Finding 2024-028 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services AL No. 93.940 HIV Prevention Activities Health Department Based Material Weakness in Internal Controls and Noncompliance over Subrecipient Monitoring Repeat Finding: Yes; 2023-024 Condition: For 1 out of 3 selections, management was unable to provide evidence that the Single Audit Report was reviewed. For 3 out of 3 selections, we were unable to verify the subrecipient's active registration on SAM.gov. For 3 out of 3 selections, various information related to the funding source and the pass-through entity is missing on the notice of award (E.g. FAIN number, UEI, CFDA and name of pass-through and indirect cost). Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR §200.303: The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR §25.300: (a) A recipient may not make a subaward to a subrecipient unless that subrecipient has obtained and provided to the recipient a unique entity identifier. Subrecipients are not required to complete full SAM registration to obtain a unique entity identifier. (b) A recipient must notify any potential subrecipients that the recipient cannot make a subaward unless the subrecipient has obtained a unique entity identifier as described in paragraph (a) of this section. According to 2 CFR §200.332, all pass-through entities must: (a) Ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the Federal award identification including the subrecipient's unique entity identifier, Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN), identification of whether the award is R&D and indirect cost rate for the Federal award. (b) Evaluate each subrecipient's risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring described in paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section, which may include consideration of such factors as: (1) The subrecipient's prior experience with the same or similar subawards; (2) The results of previous audits including whether or not the subrecipient receives a Single Audit. d) Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved. (f) Verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by 2 CFR § 200.331 when it is expected that the subrecipient's Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in § 200.501. Cause: BCHD did not have proper controls in place to ensure the subrecipient monitoring requirements of the grant were met. Effect: BCHD may not be in compliance with the subrecipient monitoring requirements of the grant. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend the City establish and implement controls to maintain compliance with subrecipient monitoring requirements. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Finding 2024-028 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services AL No. 93.940 HIV Prevention Activities Health Department Based Material Weakness in Internal Controls and Noncompliance over Subrecipient Monitoring Repeat Finding: Yes; 2023-024 Condition: For 1 out of 3 selections, management was unable to provide evidence that the Single Audit Report was reviewed. For 3 out of 3 selections, we were unable to verify the subrecipient's active registration on SAM.gov. For 3 out of 3 selections, various information related to the funding source and the pass-through entity is missing on the notice of award (E.g. FAIN number, UEI, CFDA and name of pass-through and indirect cost). Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR §200.303: The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR §25.300: (a) A recipient may not make a subaward to a subrecipient unless that subrecipient has obtained and provided to the recipient a unique entity identifier. Subrecipients are not required to complete full SAM registration to obtain a unique entity identifier. (b) A recipient must notify any potential subrecipients that the recipient cannot make a subaward unless the subrecipient has obtained a unique entity identifier as described in paragraph (a) of this section. According to 2 CFR §200.332, all pass-through entities must: (a) Ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the Federal award identification including the subrecipient's unique entity identifier, Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN), identification of whether the award is R&D and indirect cost rate for the Federal award. (b) Evaluate each subrecipient's risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring described in paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section, which may include consideration of such factors as: (1) The subrecipient's prior experience with the same or similar subawards; (2) The results of previous audits including whether or not the subrecipient receives a Single Audit. d) Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved. (f) Verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by 2 CFR § 200.331 when it is expected that the subrecipient's Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in § 200.501. Cause: BCHD did not have proper controls in place to ensure the subrecipient monitoring requirements of the grant were met. Effect: BCHD may not be in compliance with the subrecipient monitoring requirements of the grant. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend the City establish and implement controls to maintain compliance with subrecipient monitoring requirements. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name: Assistance Listing Number 84.425, Department of Education, Education Stabilization Fund Federal Award Identification Number and Year: 213713 Pass-through Entity – Michigan Department of Education Finding Type – Material weakness over compliance Repeat Finding - No Criteria – Per 2 CFR 200.512 (a) (1), the audit must be completed, and the data collection form described in paragraph (b) of this section and reporting package described in paragraph (c) of this section must be submitted within the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor's report(s), or nine months after the end of the audit period. Per 2 CFR 200.501 (b), a non-Federal entity that expends $750,000 or more during the non-Federal entity's fiscal year in Federal awards must have a single audit conducted in accordance with § 200.514. Condition – The data collection form was not submitted within the required time as required by 2 CFR 200.512 for the year ended June 30, 2023. Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed – N/A Questioned Costs – None Cause – The Academy’s books and records for the 2023 fiscal year were not reconciled or closed in a timely manner. The data collection form was not submitted within the required time. Effect – Data collection form was not submitted on time. Recommendation – We recommend that the Academy develop a reliable system to close the financial records in a timely manner. View of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan – Management agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name: Assistance Listing Number 84.425, Department of Education, Education Stabilization Fund Federal Award Identification Number and Year: 213713 Pass-through Entity – Michigan Department of Education Finding Type – Material weakness over compliance Repeat Finding - No Criteria – Per 2 CFR 200.512 (a) (1), the audit must be completed, and the data collection form described in paragraph (b) of this section and reporting package described in paragraph (c) of this section must be submitted within the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor's report(s), or nine months after the end of the audit period. Per 2 CFR 200.501 (b), a non-Federal entity that expends $750,000 or more during the non-Federal entity's fiscal year in Federal awards must have a single audit conducted in accordance with § 200.514. Condition – The data collection form was not submitted within the required time as required by 2 CFR 200.512 for the year ended June 30, 2023. Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed – N/A Questioned Costs – None Cause – The Academy’s books and records for the 2023 fiscal year were not reconciled or closed in a timely manner. The data collection form was not submitted within the required time. Effect – Data collection form was not submitted on time. Recommendation – We recommend that the Academy develop a reliable system to close the financial records in a timely manner. View of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan – Management agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name: Assistance Listing Number 84.425, Department of Education, Education Stabilization Fund Federal Award Identification Number and Year: 213713 Pass-through Entity – Michigan Department of Education Finding Type – Material weakness over compliance Repeat Finding - No Criteria – Per 2 CFR 200.512 (a) (1), the audit must be completed, and the data collection form described in paragraph (b) of this section and reporting package described in paragraph (c) of this section must be submitted within the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor's report(s), or nine months after the end of the audit period. Per 2 CFR 200.501 (b), a non-Federal entity that expends $750,000 or more during the non-Federal entity's fiscal year in Federal awards must have a single audit conducted in accordance with § 200.514. Condition – The data collection form was not submitted within the required time as required by 2 CFR 200.512 for the year ended June 30, 2023. Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed – N/A Questioned Costs – None Cause – The Academy’s books and records for the 2023 fiscal year were not reconciled or closed in a timely manner. The data collection form was not submitted within the required time. Effect – Data collection form was not submitted on time. Recommendation – We recommend that the Academy develop a reliable system to close the financial records in a timely manner. View of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan – Management agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name: Assistance Listing Number 84.425, Department of Education, Education Stabilization Fund Federal Award Identification Number and Year: 213713 Pass-through Entity – Michigan Department of Education Finding Type – Material weakness over compliance Repeat Finding - No Criteria – Per 2 CFR 200.512 (a) (1), the audit must be completed, and the data collection form described in paragraph (b) of this section and reporting package described in paragraph (c) of this section must be submitted within the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor's report(s), or nine months after the end of the audit period. Per 2 CFR 200.501 (b), a non-Federal entity that expends $750,000 or more during the non-Federal entity's fiscal year in Federal awards must have a single audit conducted in accordance with § 200.514. Condition – The data collection form was not submitted within the required time as required by 2 CFR 200.512 for the year ended June 30, 2023. Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed – N/A Questioned Costs – None Cause – The Academy’s books and records for the 2023 fiscal year were not reconciled or closed in a timely manner. The data collection form was not submitted within the required time. Effect – Data collection form was not submitted on time. Recommendation – We recommend that the Academy develop a reliable system to close the financial records in a timely manner. View of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan – Management agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan.
Federal Grantor: Department of Labor Pass-Through: Iowa Workforce Development Program: Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA) Cluster Award No. and Year: 24-N-CI-WI-OA and 2024 Federal Assistance Listing Number: 17.258, 17.259, 17.278 Compliance Requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Material Noncompliance Criteria: In accordance with Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 200.332, pass-through entities must comply with the following: 2 CFR 200.332(b) – Evaluate each subrecipient’s risk of noncompliance for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring related to the subaward. This evaluation of risk may include consideration of such factors listed in 2 CFR 200.332(b)(1) through (4). 2 CFR 200.332(d) – Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include the information at 2 CFR 200.332(d)(1) through (4). 2 CFR 200.332(f) – Verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of this part when it is expected that the subrecipient’s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in 200.501. Condition: The County did not have any formal controls in place for evaluating each subrecipient’s risk of noncompliance or the purpose of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring for the WIOA Cluster. Cause: The County did not follow their procedures to evaluate the risk of noncompliance or monitor the activities of each subrecipient, and the County did not maintain documentation of their verification that every subrecipient is audited, as required. Effect: The County’s control policies were not consistently followed which require compliance with Subrecipient Monitoring requirements in 2 CFR 200.332 and did not comply with subrecipient monitoring requirements related to the program. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs were identified as a result of our procedures. Context/Sampling: The entire population of two (2) subrecipients were selected for testing. The condition noted above was identified during our procedures related to subrecipient monitoring and was pervasive to the program. Repeat Finding from Prior Years: No. Recommendation: We recommend that the County adhere to their policies and procedures in accordance with 2 CFR 200.332 to ensure compliance with subrecipient monitoring requirements. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding. See separate corrective action plan.
Federal Grantor: Department of Labor Pass-Through: Iowa Workforce Development Program: Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA) Cluster Award No. and Year: 24-N-CI-WI-OA and 2024 Federal Assistance Listing Number: 17.258, 17.259, 17.278 Compliance Requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Material Noncompliance Criteria: In accordance with Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 200.332, pass-through entities must comply with the following: 2 CFR 200.332(b) – Evaluate each subrecipient’s risk of noncompliance for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring related to the subaward. This evaluation of risk may include consideration of such factors listed in 2 CFR 200.332(b)(1) through (4). 2 CFR 200.332(d) – Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include the information at 2 CFR 200.332(d)(1) through (4). 2 CFR 200.332(f) – Verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of this part when it is expected that the subrecipient’s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in 200.501. Condition: The County did not have any formal controls in place for evaluating each subrecipient’s risk of noncompliance or the purpose of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring for the WIOA Cluster. Cause: The County did not follow their procedures to evaluate the risk of noncompliance or monitor the activities of each subrecipient, and the County did not maintain documentation of their verification that every subrecipient is audited, as required. Effect: The County’s control policies were not consistently followed which require compliance with Subrecipient Monitoring requirements in 2 CFR 200.332 and did not comply with subrecipient monitoring requirements related to the program. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs were identified as a result of our procedures. Context/Sampling: The entire population of two (2) subrecipients were selected for testing. The condition noted above was identified during our procedures related to subrecipient monitoring and was pervasive to the program. Repeat Finding from Prior Years: No. Recommendation: We recommend that the County adhere to their policies and procedures in accordance with 2 CFR 200.332 to ensure compliance with subrecipient monitoring requirements. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding. See separate corrective action plan.
Federal Grantor: Department of Labor Pass-Through: Iowa Workforce Development Program: Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA) Cluster Award No. and Year: 24-N-CI-WI-OA and 2024 Federal Assistance Listing Number: 17.258, 17.259, 17.278 Compliance Requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Material Noncompliance Criteria: In accordance with Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 200.332, pass-through entities must comply with the following: 2 CFR 200.332(b) – Evaluate each subrecipient’s risk of noncompliance for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring related to the subaward. This evaluation of risk may include consideration of such factors listed in 2 CFR 200.332(b)(1) through (4). 2 CFR 200.332(d) – Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include the information at 2 CFR 200.332(d)(1) through (4). 2 CFR 200.332(f) – Verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of this part when it is expected that the subrecipient’s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in 200.501. Condition: The County did not have any formal controls in place for evaluating each subrecipient’s risk of noncompliance or the purpose of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring for the WIOA Cluster. Cause: The County did not follow their procedures to evaluate the risk of noncompliance or monitor the activities of each subrecipient, and the County did not maintain documentation of their verification that every subrecipient is audited, as required. Effect: The County’s control policies were not consistently followed which require compliance with Subrecipient Monitoring requirements in 2 CFR 200.332 and did not comply with subrecipient monitoring requirements related to the program. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs were identified as a result of our procedures. Context/Sampling: The entire population of two (2) subrecipients were selected for testing. The condition noted above was identified during our procedures related to subrecipient monitoring and was pervasive to the program. Repeat Finding from Prior Years: No. Recommendation: We recommend that the County adhere to their policies and procedures in accordance with 2 CFR 200.332 to ensure compliance with subrecipient monitoring requirements. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding. See separate corrective action plan.
2024-001: Significant Deficiency - Audit Completion and Submission to the Federal Government Compliance Area: Reporting (L) Criteria: Single Audits under 2 CFR Part 200 Subpart F 200.501 - Audit Requirements are required to be submitted through the Federal Clearinghouse nine months from the recipient's year end. Condition: The County did not meet the nine month submission deadline for the year ended June 30, 2024. Cause and Effect: The County was unable to close the financial records and submit the required information to the auditors in a timely manner, resulting in non-compliance. Repeat Finding: Yes. Recommendation: We recommend that the County submit the required information to the auditors in a timely manner to meet this deadline.
Finding Reference: 2024-004 Prior Year Finding: 2023-004 Federal Agency: Department of Health and Human Services Compliance Requirement: Reporting Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance, Other Matters Federal Program: Impacts All Federal Award Programs Grant Award: Various Condition/Context: The single audit report was not submitted to the Office Management and Budget in accordance with the reporting requirement. Criteria: COSO/Internal Control Framework defines control activities as “policies and procedures that help ensures management’s directives are carried out” This would include preparation of the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards and the related Data Collection Form in a timely manner. Uniform Guidance 2 CFR 200.501 states that the audit shall be completed, and the data collection form shall be submitted within the earlier of 30 days after the receipt of the auditor’s report, or nine months after the end of the audit period. Accordingly, audit for fiscal year ending June 30, 2024 was due on March 31, 2025. Cause: The single audit report was not submitted due to delays in year-end closing entries, schedules, and reconciliations. Effect: As a result of the finding, SMTCCAC did not provide required information to its federal oversight agency in a timely manner. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation: We believe that the year-end closing process could proceed in a timely manner by adhering to a closing schedule and maintaining timely account reconciliations. Progress should be monitored by management to determine that due dates are being met and required reports are submitted to regulatory agencies within the compliance time frame.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name: Across all major programs Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Across all major programs Pass-through Entity – N/A Finding Type – Material weakness in internal control over compliance and noncompliance with Uniform Guidance Single Audit reporting package submission requirement. Repeat Finding – This is a repeat finding and a similar finding was identified in the prior year as Finding 2023-001. Criteria – Per 2 CFR 200.512 (a) (1), the audit must be completed, and the data collection must be submitted within the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor's report(s), or nine months after the end of the audit period. Per 2 CFR 200.501 (b), a non-Federal entity that expends $750,000 or more during the non-Federal entity's fiscal year in Federal awards must have a single audit conducted in accordance with § 200.514. Condition – The data collection form was not submitted within the required time as required by 2 CFR 200.512 for the year ended June 30, 2024. Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed – N/A Questioned Costs – None Cause/Effect – The Agency’s books and records for the 2024 fiscal year were not reconciled or closed in a timely manner. Therefore, the data collection form was not submitted within the required time. Recommendation – We recommend that the Agency maintain a system of policies, procedures, and controls to ensure that the financial records closed in a timely manner in order to facilitate the timely submission of the data collection form. View of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan – The Agency will take all reasonable measures to work with the new auditors to complete the audit process and submit the data collection report within the required time period
DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES SUBRECIPIENT MONITORING Significant Deficiency Immaterial Noncompliance 2024-039 Strengthen Controls over Subrecipient Monitoring to Ensure Compliance with Uniform Guidance Auditing Requirements. ALN Number(s) 93.558 Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) 93.489, 93.575, 93.596 Child Care Development Fund (CCDF) 93.568 Low Income Household Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP) Federal Award No. All Current Active Grants Questioned Costs N/A Criteria Code of Federal Regulations (2 CFR 200.512(a)(1)) states the audit must be completed and the data collection form described in paragraph (b) of this section and reporting package described in paragraph (c) of this section must be submitted within the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor's report(s), or nine months after the end of the audit period. If the due date falls on a Saturday, Sunday, or Federal holiday, the reporting package is due the next business day. Code of Federal Regulations (2 CFR 200.332(d)(2)) states all pass-through entities must monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity detected through audits, on-site reviews, and written confirmation from the subrecipient, highlighting the status of actions planned or taken to address Single Audit findings related to the particular subaward. Code of Federal Regulations (2 CFR 200.332(f)) states all pass-through entities must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of this part when it is expected that the subrecipient's Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in 200.501. Condition When performing testwork related to OMB Single Audit Monitoring as of June 30, 2024, the auditor noted the following: • Four instances (or 33.33 percent) in which there was no documentation of communication between the agency and the subrecipient regarding audit reports that had not been received within nine months of the subrecipients fiscal year-end. • One instance (or 8 percent) in which there was no documentation that a corrective action plan was provided. Cause Staff were either unaware or did not follow identified policies and procedures for monitoring requirements. Effect Failure to properly monitor subrecipients could allow noncompliance with federal regulations to occur and go undetected, potentially resulting in fraud, waste, and abuse within the agency. Recommendation We recommend the Mississippi Department of Human Services' Division of Program Integrity - Division of Monitoring (DM) strengthen controls over subrecipient monitoring for Uniform Guidance audits to ensure recipients expending $750,000 or more in Federal funds during their fiscal year are meeting Uniform Guidance Audit requirements. Repeat Finding Yes, 2023-018, 2022-018, and 2021-014. Statistically Valid Yes.
Condition: Creek County did not have written standards of conduct that cover conflicts of interest and govern the performance of its employees engaged in the selection, award, and administration of contracts. Cause of Condition: Policies and procedures have not been designed and implemented to ensure compliance with all federal award requirements. Effect of Condition: This condition resulted in noncompliance with federal grant requirements and could lead to a loss of federal funds to the County. Recommendation: OSAI recommends county officials and department heads gain an understanding of federal programs awarded to Creek County. Internal control procedures should be designed and implemented to ensure compliance with federal requirements. Management Response: Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners and County Clerk: It has been brought to our attention that we need an additional policy that covers conflict of interests and govern the performance of its employees engaged in the selection, award, and administration of contracts. We have taken this recommendation and are implementing the proper language, for all employees to acknowledge in our County Handbook. We will strengthen this control, and we will review the policy annually, so that all conflicts can be disclosed. Creek County prides itself in moving toward complete transparency and holding each employee accountable to disclose all information needed to make a proper selection of purchases. Creek County Clerk's Office will work with the District Attorney's Office for proper language. Criteria: Compliance and Reporting Guidance, State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (8. Procurement, Suspension & Debarment.) Section 200.308 General Procurement Standards reads as follows: (a) Documented procurement procedures. The recipient or subrecipient must maintain and use documented procedures for procurement transactions under a Federal award or subaward, including for acquisition of property or services. These documented procurement procedures must be consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. (b) Oversight of contractors. Recipients and subrecipients must maintain oversight to ensure that contractors perform in accordance with the terms, conditions, and specifications of their contracts or purchase orders. See also § 200.501(h). (c) Conflicts of interest. (1) The recipient or subrecipient must maintain written standards of conduct covering conflicts of interest and governing the actions of its employees engaged in the selection, award, and administration of contracts. No employee, officer, agent, or board member with a real or apparent conflict of interest may participate in the selection, award, or administration of a contract supported by the Federal award. A conflict of interest includes when the employee, officer, agent, or board member, any member of their immediate family, their partner, or an organization that employs or is about to employ any of the parties indicated herein, has a financial or other interest in or a tangible personal benefit from an entity considered for a contract. An employee, officer, agent, and board member of the recipient or subrecipient may neither solicit nor accept gratuities, favors, or anything of monetary value from contractors. However, the recipient or subrecipient may set standards for situations where the financial interest is not substantial or a gift is an unsolicited item of nominal value. The recipient's or subrecipient's standards of conduct must also provide for disciplinary actions to be applied for violations by its employees, officers, agents, or board members. (2) If the recipient or subrecipient has a parent, affiliate, or subsidiary organization that is not a State, local government, or Indian Tribe, the recipient or subrecipient must also maintain written standards of conduct covering organizational conflicts of interest. Organizational conflicts of interest mean that because of relationships with a parent company, affiliate, or subsidiary organization, the recipient or subrecipient is unable or appears to be unable to be impartial in conducting a procurement action involving a related organization. (d) Avoidance of unnecessary or duplicative items. The recipient's or subrecipient's procedures must avoid the acquisition of unnecessary or duplicative items. Consideration should be given to consolidating or breaking out procurements to obtain a more economical purchase. When appropriate, an analysis should be made between leasing and purchasing property or equipment to determine the most economical approach. (e) Procurement arrangements using strategic sourcing. When appropriate for the procurement or use of common or shared goods and services, recipients and subrecipients are encouraged to enter into State and local intergovernmental agreements or inter-entity agreements for procurement transactions. These or similar procurement arrangements using strategic sourcing may foster greater economy and efficiency. Documented procurement actions of this type (using strategic sourcing, shared services, and other similar procurement arrangements) will meet the competition requirements of this part. (f) Use of excess and surplus Federal property. The recipient or subrecipient is encouraged to use excess and surplus Federal property instead of purchasing new equipment and property when it is feasible and reduces project costs. (g) Use of value engineering clauses. When practical, the recipient or subrecipient is encouraged to use value engineering clauses in contracts for construction projects of sufficient size to offer reasonable opportunities for cost reductions. Value engineering means analyzing each contract item or task to ensure its essential function is provided at the overall lowest cost. (h) Responsible contractors. The recipient or subrecipient must award contracts only to responsible contractors that possess the ability to perform successfully under the terms and conditions of a proposed contract. The recipient or subrecipient must consider contractor integrity, public policy compliance, proper classification of employees (see the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. 201, chapter 8), past performance record, and financial and technical resources when conducting a procurement transaction. See also § 200.214. (i) Procurement records. The recipient or subrecipient must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of each procurement transaction. These records must include the rationale for the procurement method, contract type selection, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. (j) Time-and-materials type contracts. (1) The recipient or subrecipient may use a time-and-materials type contract only after a determination that no other contract is suitable and if the contract includes a ceiling price that the contractor exceeds at its own risk. Time-and-materials type contract means a contract whose cost to a recipient or subrecipient is the sum of: (i) The actual cost of materials; and (ii) Direct labor hours charged at fixed hourly rates that reflect wages, general and administrative expenses, and profit. (2) Because this formula generates an open-ended contract price, a time-and-materials contract provides no positive profit incentive to the contractor for cost control or labor efficiency. Therefore, each contract must set a ceiling price that the contractor exceeds at its own risk. Further, the recipient or subrecipient awarding such a contract must assert a high degree of oversight to obtain reasonable assurance that the contractor is using efficient methods and effective cost controls.
FINDING NO: 2024-014 (Repeat 2023-026) Strengthen Internal Controls Over Monitoring of Subrecipient Agreements and Expenditures STATE AGENCY: State of Oklahoma, Office of Management and Enterprise Services (OMES) FEDERAL AGENCY: US Department of Treasury ALN: 21.023 FEDERAL PROGRAM NAME: Emergency Rental Assistance (ERA 1 and ERA 2) FEDERAL AWARD NUMBER: ERA028 and ERAE0259 FEDERAL AWARD YEAR: 2024 CONTROL CATEGORY: Subrecipient Monitoring QUESTIONED COSTS: $0 Condition and Context: Oversight and management of the ERA program has been transferred at the beginning of SFY25 from the office of the Director of Budget, Policy and Gaming Compliance to the OMES Grant Management Office (OMES-GMO), which has staff with several years of grant experience. OMES-GMO recently hired additional staff, and the two staff members dedicated to the management of the ERA program have 20+ years of combined federal grant specific experience. The GMO implemented a multi-level system of internal controls for grant management and oversight that includes routine monitoring, desk review, and site visits for all projects and associated project/administrative expenditures to ensure allowability, accuracy, and assist in the detection of fraud. SAI began working on the SFY24 audit of the ERA program in the fall of 2025 and the OMES GMO actively facilitated all of our audit requests (to the extent the subrecipients would provide the requested information), worked to implement corrective action for all prior year audit findings and implemented oversight and monitoring activities over the remaining unexpended ERA grant funds. However, because these activities did not start until after the SFY24 audit period, most of the prior year audit findings remained uncorrected during the SFY24 audit period resulting in repeat findings. The following issues associated with monitoring occurred prior to the current OMES GMO assuming responsibility for the oversight of the State of Oklahoma ERA program. The State of Oklahoma entered into an agreement with a non-profit entity, Communities Foundation of Oklahoma (CFO), to administer the ERA program for the State of Oklahoma. SAI reviewed the agreement for this entity during our SFY 2021 audit and determined the agreement constituted a subrecipient relationship that would be subject to Part M Subrecipient Monitoring requirements, which was communicated to OMES in findings from the SFY 2021 audit sent to OMES 9/7/2022, The subrecipient expended $8,936,468 in Federal funds during State Fiscal Year (SFY) 2024; however, the Office of Management Enterprise Services (OMES) did not perform any subrecipient monitoring procedures; . OMES advanced program funds, totaling $343,173,664.69, to CFO during SFY 2021-SFY 2023 for which CFO did not submit any documentation to support program expenditures incurred. While OMES did obtain summary information related to rental and utility payments and housing stability payments made for reporting purposes, OMES did not request, obtain or review any support for administrative or program costs to ensure that the costs were attributable to providing financial assistance and housing stability services to eligible households. 1 See SEFA Footnote 10 explaining why the ERA program is not a major program for 2024. However, even though the program is not material based on State of Oklahoma expenditures, we noted Material Weaknesses and Significant Deficiencies in Internal Controls, Material Noncompliance, and Questioned Costs greater than $25,000 when auditing the subrecipient expenditures. Therefore, these deficiencies will be reported under non-major program classification. Until the end of FY2025, OMES did not have a process in place to review potential fraud identified by the subrecipients and ensure that the agency’s response was adequate. OMES also did not have a process to ensure subrecipients were adequately evaluated for the types of fraud that may occur or identifying fraud risk factors applicable to the ERA program. OMES was unable to provide documentation to support that a risk assessment was performed in which each subrecipient would have been verified to have maintained an active status in the SAM.gov system, and that subrecipients were not suspended or disbarred. Cause: OMES did not timely take corrective action to address prior year findings from the SFY 21 - SFY 23 audits. OMES did not timely take corrective action to require OMES personnel to obtain, review, approve, or maintain adequate supporting documentation for all subrecipient expenditures. The required corrective action would have included transferring administration of the ERA grant to the GMO office or other personnel with the experience and expertise to administer Federal grant funds before the majority of the ERA funds were expended by the subrecipient. Additionally, OMES subrecipient monitoring process lacked the strength and consistency to ensure subrecipients established and maintained effective internal control over the Federal award to provide reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity was managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Effect: Inadequate risk assessment procedures and the lack of appropriate monitoring resulted in non-compliance with award terms and mismanagement of award funds. Furthermore, noncompliance increases the risk of Federal claw backs, which impacts state dollars. OMES decisions to delay appropriate oversight of the ERA program and to delay implementation of adequate corrective action until after the majority of grant funds have been expended by a subrecipient increases the risk that funds may not be successfully recouped from the subrecipient and greatly increases the risk that the state taxpayers will be required to pay back accumulated questioned costs of over $23 million in unallowable costs. Subrecipient agreements were not maintained for the period of performance of the Federal award. As a result, Federal funds may not have been authorized, increasing the risk of improper use of Federal funds. Recommendation: We recommend that the OMES GMO continue implementing the corrective action plan established in FY 2025 to provide proper oversight and monitoring of ERA program expenditures. Criteria: 2 CFR § 200.303(a) states in part, “The Non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award.” 2 CFR § 200.332 states in part, “All pass-through entities must: … b. evaluate each subrecipient's risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring, which may include consideration of such factors as: 1. The subrecipient's prior experience with the same or similar subawards; 2. The results of previous audits including whether or not the subrecipient receives a Single Audit in accordance with Subpart F - Audit Requirements of this part, and the extent to which the same or similar subaward has been audited as a major program; 3. Whether the subrecipient has new personnel or new or substantially changed systems; and 4. The extent and results of Federal awarding agency monitoring (e.g., if the subrecipient also receives Federal awards directly from a Federal awarding agency). … d. Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: … 2. Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity detected through audits, on-site reviews, and written confirmation from the subrecipient, highlighting the status of actions planned or taken to address Single Audit findings related to the particular subaward. … f. Verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of this part when it is expected that the subrecipient's Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in § 200.501.” 2 CFR § 200.334 states in part, “Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal entity records pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report or, for Federal awards that are renewed quarterly or annually, from the date of the submission of the quarterly or annual financial report, respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity in the case of a subrecipient.” 2 CFR § 200.337 states in part, “(a) Records of non-Federal entities. The Federal awarding agency, Inspectors General, the Comptroller General of the United States, and the pass-through entity, or any of their authorized representatives, must have the right of access to any documents, papers, or other records of the non-Federal entity which are pertinent to the Federal award, in order to make audits, examinations, excerpts, and transcripts. The right also includes timely and reasonable access to the non-Federal entity's personnel for the purpose of interview and discussion related to such documents.” U.S Department of the Treasury Emergency Rental Assistance Grantee Award Form (8) (a-b) Compliance with Applicable Law and Regulations, states in part, a. “Recipient agrees to comply with the requirements of Section 501 and Treasury interpretive guidance regarding such requirements. Recipient also agrees to comply with all other applicable federal statutes, regulations, and executive orders, and Recipient shall provide for such compliance in any agreements it enters into with other parties relating to this award. b. Federal regulations applicable to this award include, without limitation, the following: i. Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, 2 C.F.R. Part 200, other than such provisions as Treasury may determine are inapplicable to this Award and subject to such exceptions as may be otherwise provided by Treasury. Subpart F -Audit Requirements of the Uniform Guidance, implementing the Single Audit Act, shall apply to this award… iii. Reporting Subaward and Executive Compensation Information, 2 C.F.R. Part 170, pursuant to which the award term set forth in Appendix A to 2 C.F.R. Part 170 is hereby incorporated by reference.” The US Department of Treasury Emergency Rental Assistance (ERA) FAQ #31 states in part “Grantees should require recipients of funds under ERA programs, including tenants and landlords, to commit in writing to use ERA assistance only for the intended purpose before issuing a payment. Grantees are not required to obtain documentation evidencing the use of ERA program funds by tenants and landlords. Grantees are expected to apply reasonable fraud-prevention procedures and to investigate and address potential instances of fraud or the misuse of funds that they become aware of.” Management Response Contact Person: Brandy Manek, OMES Director of Budget, Policy & Gaming Compliance Anticipated Completion Date: Completed Corrective Action Planned: The Oklahoma Office of Management and Enterprise Services (OMES) partially concurs with the finding. See corrective action plan located in the corrective action plan section of this report. Auditor’s Response: With regard to the assertion that the State “could not take corrective action prior to the FY2024 audit began”, we respectfully disagree per the following reasons: As a recipient of the Federal ERA award, the State of Oklahoma is responsible for understanding the terms and conditions of the award and to ensure the ERA award is administered in accordance with federal regulations, which includes subrecipient monitoring activities. In May of 2021, the State first received Coronavirus Relief Fund (CRF) Audit Finding # 2020-083 related to the State’s lack of subrecipient monitoring activities and Audit Finding # 2020-081 related to the State’s failure to obtain adequate supporting documentation for subrecipient expenditures prior to paying for goods and services. The same individual served as the State’s audit contact for both the CRF award and the ERA award and, therefore, the State could have begun implementing required subrecipient monitoring activities and ensuring adequate supporting documentation was obtained from the subrecipient in May of 2021. Although the SFY 2021 Single Audit Report was not actually released until June 2023, the SFY 2021 Single Audit Report was originally scheduled for publication near the end of September of 2022, and, on September 6, 2022, SA & I provided OMES Audit Finding # 2021-081 which included the following subrecipient monitoring issues SA & I had identified as of that date: “OMES entered into agreements with two non-profit entities to administer the ERA program for the State of Oklahoma: Communities Foundation of Oklahoma (CFO) and Restore Hope Ministries (RHM). SAI reviewed the agreements for these two entities and determined that both agreements constituted a subrecipient relationship that would be subject to Part M Subrecipient Monitoring requirements. We noted that OMES failed to perform any required subrecipient monitoring activities, specifically: • OMES did not provide the subrecipients with appropriate documentation to identify the required Federal award identification information per 2 CFR section 200.331(a)(1). • OMES did not perform a risk assessment that met the compliance requirements. The risk assessment performed did not include any assessment of the risks related to the payments made by the subrecipient for rental, utility, and administrative payments, and it was not designed to identify transactions or types of payments at higher risk and then identify additional monitoring procedures to address those risks. • OMES did not perform any during the award monitoring activities with regard to the rental and utility applications, housing stability and payments approved and paid by the subrecipients, or the administrative expenditures actually incurred by the subrecipients. OMES provided subrecipients advance payments based off expected program rental and utility expenditures for the month and then paid administrative costs on a set percentage of program funds advanced. OMES did not review any supporting documentation related to actual program expenditures for rental and utility assistance, housing stability activities, or administrative expenditures actually incurred by the subrecipients. While OMES did obtain summary information related to rental and utility payments and housing stability payments made for reporting purposes, OMES did not review any actual administrative expenditures to ensure that the administrative costs were attributable to providing financial assistance and housing stability services to eligible households. • OMES provided in excess of $750,000 in Federal funds to both CFO and RHM during SFY 2021; however, OMES did not have a process for identifying and tracking the total amount of federal funds received by subrecipients and notifying the subrecipients of the Single Audit requirements and date the audit would be due. • OMES did not obtain any financial records and supporting documents from the subrecipients that would support the actual expenditures incurred by the subrecipients.” Given the State first received similar findings for the SFY 2020 CRF award in May of 2021 (12 months before the start of SFY 2023 and 24 months before the start of SFY 2024), the State did have sufficient and timely notice to make full corrective actions prior to this SFY 2024 audit and even prior to the SFY 2023 audit. It is the position of our office that the State could have greatly reduced the amount of ERA questioned costs incurred over the past few years if the State had not waited about three and a half years (May 2021 to January 2025) from when SA & I first provided applicable findings to start implementing corrective action.
Federal Agency: United States Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program: Block Grants for Community Mental Health Services (93.958) Federal Award Numbers: 21B1NYCMHSC6; 22B1NYCMHS; 23B1NYCMHS Federal Award Years: 2021, 2022, and 2023 State Agency: Office of Mental Health Reference: 2024-009 Criteria Subrecipient monitoring Title 45 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 75 (45 CFR 75), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for HHS Awards, Section 352(a) states all pass-through entities must ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the following information at the time of the subaward and if any of these data elements change, include the changes in subsequent subaward modification. When some of this information is not available, the pass-through entity must provide the best information available to describe the Federal award and subaward. Required information include: 1. Federal Award Identification. i) Subrecipient name (which must match the name associated with its unique entity identifier; ii) Subrecipient’s unique entity identifier; iii) Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN); iv) Federal Award Date (see Section 75.2 Federal award date) of award to the recipient by the HHS awarding agency; v) Subaward Period of Performance Start and End Date; vi) Amount of Federal Funds Obligated by this action by the pass-through entity to the subrecipient; vii) Total Amount of Federal Funds Obligated to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity including the current obligation; viii) Total Amount of the Federal Award committed to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity; ix) Federal award project description, as required to be responsive to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA); x) Name of HHS awarding agency, pass-through entity, and contract information for awarding official of the pass-through entity; xi) sAssistance Listing Number (ALN) and Name; the pass-through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each Federal award and the ALN number at time of disbursement; xii) Identification of whether the award is R&D; and xiii) Indirect cost rate for the Federal award (including if the de minimis rate is charged per Section 75.414). 2. All requirements imposed by the pass-through entity on the subrecipient so that the Federal award is used in accordance with Federal statutes, regulations and the terms and conditions of the Federal award; 3. Any additional requirements that the pass-through entity imposes on the subrecipient in order for the pass- through entity to meet its own responsibility to the HHS awarding agency including identification of any required financial and performance reports; 4. An approved federally recognized indirect cost rate negotiated between the subrecipient and the Federal Government or, if no such rate exists, either a rate negotiated between the pass-through entity and the subrecipient (in compliance with this part), or a deminimis indirect cost rate as defined in § 75.414(f); 5. A requirement that the subrecipient permit the pass-through entity and auditors to have access to the subrecipient's records and financial statements as necessary for the pass-through entity to meet the requirements of this part; and 6. Appropriate terms and conditions concerning closeout of the subaward. Title 45 Code of Federal Regulations Part 75, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for HHS Awards (45 CFR 75), section 352(b) states all pass-through entities must evaluate each subrecipient's risk of noncompliance with Federal Statues, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring as described in paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section, which may include consideration of such factors as: 1. The subrecipient's prior experience with the same or similar subawards; 2. The results of previous audits including whether or not the subrecipient receives a Single Audit in accordance with subpart F, and the extent to which the same or similar subaward has been audited as a major program; 3. Whether the subrecipient has new personnel or new or substantially changed systems; and 4. The extent and results of HHS awarding agency monitoring (e.g., if the subrecipient also receives Federal awards directly from a HHS awarding agency). Additionally, 45 CFR 75.352(d) states all pass-through entities must monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: 1. Reviewing financial and performance reports required by the pass-through entity. 2. Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means. 3. Issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity as required by Section 75.521. 45 CFR 74.352(e) states depending upon the pass-through entity's assessment of risk posed by the sub recipient (as described in paragraph (b) of this section), the following monitoring tools may be useful for the pass-through entity to ensure proper accountability and compliance with program requirements and achievement of performance goals: 4. Providing subrecipients with training and technical assistance on program related matters; and 5. Performing on-site reviews of the subrecipient's program operations; 6. Arranging for agreed-upon-procedures engagements as described in § 75.425 Further, 45 CFR 75.352(f) states the pass-through entity must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of this part when it is expected that the subrecipient's Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in § 200.501. Internal controls Lastly, 45 CFR 75.303 (a) states the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal Entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in "Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government" issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the "Internal Control Integrated Framework", issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2024, the Office of Mental Health (the Office) passed through $62,549,685 under the Block Grants for Community Mental Health Services program, to local districts and providers (subrecipients) to provide programmatic and administrative services. As part of the funding arrangement, the local districts and providers (subrecipients) are responsible for carrying out the programmatic services and use the funds to provide comprehensive, community‐based mental health services to adults with serious mental illnesses and to children with serious emotional disturbances and to monitor progress in implementing a comprehensive, community based mental health system. Funds are used for prevention, treatment, recovery support, and other services to supplement Medicaid, Medicare, and private insurance services. When subawards are made to subrecipients, the pass-through entities are required to communicate certain award information. The Office’s policies and procedures are not designed to ensure that award notifications are provided to subrecipients as required by 45 CFR 75.352(a). During our testwork of 40 subrecipient award notifications, we noted the following: 1. For 4 subrecipients, the Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN) was not provided. 2. For 10 subrecipients, which are all New York State Counties, there was no notification of access to records. 3. For 17 of the subrecipients, there was no notification of the DUNS number. All pass-through entities are required to perform a risk assessment over each subrecipient’s risk of noncompliance for purposes of determining appropriate subrecipient monitoring procedures. The Office did not perform an annual risk assessment process related to its subrecipients as required by 45 CFR 75.352(b). Additionally, all pass-through entities must monitor the activities of the subrecipient which must include review of financial and performance reports, follow up to ensure the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on any deficiencies identified, and issue a management decision for audit findings. The Office did not monitor and retain documentation of review of financial and performance reports, follow up to ensure appropriate action on any deficiencies identified, nor issue a management decision for audit findings. Lastly, all pass-through entities are required to verify each subrecipient is audited, if required. The Office did not ensure that all required single audits of the program’s subrecipients were received, reviewed, followed-up, or appropriate action was taken and as necessary issued a management decision pertaining to the audit finding in accordance with 45 CFR 75, as applicable. Cause The condition found was due the timing of the implementation of the OMH corrective action plan for a finding that was identified in the previous fiscal year. The condition found was primarily due to the lack of written policies and procedures to ensure that: 1. all required award identification information per 45 CFR 75.352(a) is communicated to the subrecipients for each federal subaward period; 2. an appropriate risk assessment process is in place per 45 CFR 75.352(b); 3. during award monitoring procedures are performed per 45 CFR 75.352(d); and 4. review of the subrecipient single audit reports are performed per 45 CFR 75.352(f). Resource constraints have been a challenge throughout the current fiscal year, which prevented OMH from fully implementing its corrective action plan during this period. Possible Asserted Effect Failure to adequately communicate award identification information could result in the subrecipient not being able to adequately track and report the subawards received, resulting in errors being reported on the schedule of expenditures of federal awards within a subrecipient’s annual single audit report and not being able to comply with required terms and conditions of the federal award. Failure to perform an annual risk assessment to determine appropriate subrecipient monitoring procedures, failure to review financial and performance reports of subrecipients, as well as failure to obtain and review subrecipient single audit reports may result in insufficient monitoring procedures being performed to detect subrecipient noncompliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Questioned Costs Cannot be determined. Statistical Sampling The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was included in the 2023 Single Audit Report as finding number 2023-017 on pages 60-63. Recommendation We recommend that the Office enhance its processes and internal controls over its reporting to the subrecipients of the federal program to ensure all award identification information required under 45 CFR 75.352(a) is provided to the subrecipients of the Office as data elements change or funding is passed-through. We recommend that the Office implement policies, procedures, and internal controls to ensure that risk assessments of subrecipients are performed on an annual basis to determine appropriate monitoring of subrecipients is performed in accordance with 45 CFR 75.352(d) and 45 CFR 75.352(e). Lastly, we recommend that the Office implement policies, procedures, and internal controls to track and review all subrecipients’ single audit submissions per 45 CFR 75.252(f).
Condition: The Organization did not submit the audit and Data Collection form within the nine-month due date for the fiscal year 2023. Criteria: According to the OMB Circular A–133, Subpart B--Audits §___.200(a), and Uniform Guidance, 2 CFR 200.501(a), non-Federal entities that expend $750,000 or more in a year in Federal awards shall have a single or program-specific audit conducted for that year in accordance with the provisions of these parts. The audit must be completed, and the data collection form described in paragraph (b) of this section and reporting package described in paragraph (c) of this section must be submitted within the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor's report(s), or nine months after the end of the audit period. If the due date falls on a Saturday, Sunday, or Federal holiday, the reporting package is due the next business day. Questioned Costs: There are no questioned costs. Cause: The Organization has encountered staffing issues and consistency in the fiscal office over the past couple of years which has made it difficult for the management team to close the books in a timely manner and caused audit delays. Effect: Since the Organization submitted the audit and Data Collection form late, they are not in compliance with OMB Circular A–133, Subpart B--Audits §___.200(a), and Uniform Guidance, 2 CFR 200.501(a). Perspective: This is a systemic issue, in that controls over the requirement have not been developed to ensure no issues arise. Repeat Finding: This a repeat finding. Recommendation: RBT recommends the Organization develop a closing checklist and timeline so that the books are closed and the audit can be completed in a timely manner. Perspective: This is a systematic issue, in that controls over the requirement have not been developed to ensure no issues arise. Repeat: This is not a repeat finding. Responsible Offical's Response: The Organization agrees with the finding. See attached corrective action plan.
Condition: The Organization did not submit the audit and Data Collection form within the nine-month due date for the fiscal year 2023. Criteria: According to the OMB Circular A–133, Subpart B--Audits §___.200(a), and Uniform Guidance, 2 CFR 200.501(a), non-Federal entities that expend $750,000 or more in a year in Federal awards shall have a single or program-specific audit conducted for that year in accordance with the provisions of these parts. The audit must be completed, and the data collection form described in paragraph (b) of this section and reporting package described in paragraph (c) of this section must be submitted within the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor's report(s), or nine months after the end of the audit period. If the due date falls on a Saturday, Sunday, or Federal holiday, the reporting package is due the next business day. Questioned Costs: There are no questioned costs. Cause: The Organization has encountered staffing issues and consistency in the fiscal office over the past couple of years which has made it difficult for the management team to close the books in a timely manner and caused audit delays. Effect: Since the Organization submitted the audit and Data Collection form late, they are not in compliance with OMB Circular A–133, Subpart B--Audits §___.200(a), and Uniform Guidance, 2 CFR 200.501(a). Perspective: This is a systemic issue, in that controls over the requirement have not been developed to ensure no issues arise. Repeat Finding: This a repeat finding. Recommendation: RBT recommends the Organization develop a closing checklist and timeline so that the books are closed and the audit can be completed in a timely manner. Perspective: This is a systematic issue, in that controls over the requirement have not been developed to ensure no issues arise. Repeat: This is not a repeat finding. Responsible Offical's Response: The Organization agrees with the finding. See attached corrective action plan.
Condition: The Organization did not submit the audit and Data Collection form within the nine-month due date for the fiscal year 2023. Criteria: According to the OMB Circular A–133, Subpart B--Audits §___.200(a), and Uniform Guidance, 2 CFR 200.501(a), non-Federal entities that expend $750,000 or more in a year in Federal awards shall have a single or program-specific audit conducted for that year in accordance with the provisions of these parts. The audit must be completed, and the data collection form described in paragraph (b) of this section and reporting package described in paragraph (c) of this section must be submitted within the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor's report(s), or nine months after the end of the audit period. If the due date falls on a Saturday, Sunday, or Federal holiday, the reporting package is due the next business day. Questioned Costs: There are no questioned costs. Cause: The Organization has encountered staffing issues and consistency in the fiscal office over the past couple of years which has made it difficult for the management team to close the books in a timely manner and caused audit delays. Effect: Since the Organization submitted the audit and Data Collection form late, they are not in compliance with OMB Circular A–133, Subpart B--Audits §___.200(a), and Uniform Guidance, 2 CFR 200.501(a). Perspective: This is a systemic issue, in that controls over the requirement have not been developed to ensure no issues arise. Repeat Finding: This a repeat finding. Recommendation: RBT recommends the Organization develop a closing checklist and timeline so that the books are closed and the audit can be completed in a timely manner. Perspective: This is a systematic issue, in that controls over the requirement have not been developed to ensure no issues arise. Repeat: This is not a repeat finding. Responsible Offical's Response: The Organization agrees with the finding. See attached corrective action plan.
Condition: The Organization did not submit the audit and Data Collection form within the nine-month due date for the fiscal year 2023. Criteria: According to the OMB Circular A–133, Subpart B--Audits §___.200(a), and Uniform Guidance, 2 CFR 200.501(a), non-Federal entities that expend $750,000 or more in a year in Federal awards shall have a single or program-specific audit conducted for that year in accordance with the provisions of these parts. The audit must be completed, and the data collection form described in paragraph (b) of this section and reporting package described in paragraph (c) of this section must be submitted within the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor's report(s), or nine months after the end of the audit period. If the due date falls on a Saturday, Sunday, or Federal holiday, the reporting package is due the next business day. Questioned Costs: There are no questioned costs. Cause: The Organization has encountered staffing issues and consistency in the fiscal office over the past couple of years which has made it difficult for the management team to close the books in a timely manner and caused audit delays. Effect: Since the Organization submitted the audit and Data Collection form late, they are not in compliance with OMB Circular A–133, Subpart B--Audits §___.200(a), and Uniform Guidance, 2 CFR 200.501(a). Perspective: This is a systemic issue, in that controls over the requirement have not been developed to ensure no issues arise. Repeat Finding: This a repeat finding. Recommendation: RBT recommends the Organization develop a closing checklist and timeline so that the books are closed and the audit can be completed in a timely manner. Perspective: This is a systematic issue, in that controls over the requirement have not been developed to ensure no issues arise. Repeat: This is not a repeat finding. Responsible Offical's Response: The Organization agrees with the finding. See attached corrective action plan.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name: Across all programs Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Across all programs Pass-through Entity – Various Finding Type – Material weakness in internal control over compliance Repeat Finding – N/A Criteria – Per 2 CFR 200.512 (a) (1), the audit must be completed, and the data collection form described in paragraph (b) of this section and reporting package described in paragraph (c) of this section must be submitted within the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor's report(s), or nine months after the end of the audit period. Per 2 CFR 200.501 (b), a non-Federal entity that expends $750,000 or more during the non-Federal entity's fiscal year in Federal awards must have a single audit conducted in accordance with § 200.514. Condition – The data collection form was not submitted within the required time as required by 2 CFR 200.512 for the year ended March 31, 2024. Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed – N/A Questioned Costs – None Cause – Activities related to a certain Federal grant were not accurately monitored or tracked to ensure proper reporting, which in turn caused a delay in closing the books and records in a timely manner. Effect – The data collection form was not submitted within the required time as required by 2 CFR 200.512. Recommendation – We recommend that the Organization maintain a system of policies, procedures, and controls to ensure that the financial records closed in a timely manner in order to facilitate the timely submission of the data collection form. View of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan – To enhance the efficiency and accuracy of financial reporting in a timely manner, the Organization will implement a detailed checklist and timeline for grant closeout procedures. The finance team will ensure expenditures meet the grant agreement schedule and follow the grant closeout guidelines. The procedures will be supported by a calendar reminder system for all critical milestones. This finding relates one legacy grant.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name: Across all programs Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Across all programs Pass-through Entity – Various Finding Type – Material weakness in internal control over compliance Repeat Finding – N/A Criteria – Per 2 CFR 200.512 (a) (1), the audit must be completed, and the data collection form described in paragraph (b) of this section and reporting package described in paragraph (c) of this section must be submitted within the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor's report(s), or nine months after the end of the audit period. Per 2 CFR 200.501 (b), a non-Federal entity that expends $750,000 or more during the non-Federal entity's fiscal year in Federal awards must have a single audit conducted in accordance with § 200.514. Condition – The data collection form was not submitted within the required time as required by 2 CFR 200.512 for the year ended March 31, 2024. Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed – N/A Questioned Costs – None Cause – Activities related to a certain Federal grant were not accurately monitored or tracked to ensure proper reporting, which in turn caused a delay in closing the books and records in a timely manner. Effect – The data collection form was not submitted within the required time as required by 2 CFR 200.512. Recommendation – We recommend that the Organization maintain a system of policies, procedures, and controls to ensure that the financial records closed in a timely manner in order to facilitate the timely submission of the data collection form. View of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan – To enhance the efficiency and accuracy of financial reporting in a timely manner, the Organization will implement a detailed checklist and timeline for grant closeout procedures. The finance team will ensure expenditures meet the grant agreement schedule and follow the grant closeout guidelines. The procedures will be supported by a calendar reminder system for all critical milestones. This finding relates one legacy grant.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name: Across all programs Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Across all programs Pass-through Entity – Various Finding Type – Material weakness in internal control over compliance Repeat Finding – N/A Criteria – Per 2 CFR 200.512 (a) (1), the audit must be completed, and the data collection form described in paragraph (b) of this section and reporting package described in paragraph (c) of this section must be submitted within the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor's report(s), or nine months after the end of the audit period. Per 2 CFR 200.501 (b), a non-Federal entity that expends $750,000 or more during the non-Federal entity's fiscal year in Federal awards must have a single audit conducted in accordance with § 200.514. Condition – The data collection form was not submitted within the required time as required by 2 CFR 200.512 for the year ended March 31, 2024. Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed – N/A Questioned Costs – None Cause – Activities related to a certain Federal grant were not accurately monitored or tracked to ensure proper reporting, which in turn caused a delay in closing the books and records in a timely manner. Effect – The data collection form was not submitted within the required time as required by 2 CFR 200.512. Recommendation – We recommend that the Organization maintain a system of policies, procedures, and controls to ensure that the financial records closed in a timely manner in order to facilitate the timely submission of the data collection form. View of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan – To enhance the efficiency and accuracy of financial reporting in a timely manner, the Organization will implement a detailed checklist and timeline for grant closeout procedures. The finance team will ensure expenditures meet the grant agreement schedule and follow the grant closeout guidelines. The procedures will be supported by a calendar reminder system for all critical milestones. This finding relates one legacy grant.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name: Across all programs Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Across all programs Pass-through Entity – Various Finding Type – Material weakness in internal control over compliance Repeat Finding – N/A Criteria – Per 2 CFR 200.512 (a) (1), the audit must be completed, and the data collection form described in paragraph (b) of this section and reporting package described in paragraph (c) of this section must be submitted within the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor's report(s), or nine months after the end of the audit period. Per 2 CFR 200.501 (b), a non-Federal entity that expends $750,000 or more during the non-Federal entity's fiscal year in Federal awards must have a single audit conducted in accordance with § 200.514. Condition – The data collection form was not submitted within the required time as required by 2 CFR 200.512 for the year ended March 31, 2024. Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed – N/A Questioned Costs – None Cause – Activities related to a certain Federal grant were not accurately monitored or tracked to ensure proper reporting, which in turn caused a delay in closing the books and records in a timely manner. Effect – The data collection form was not submitted within the required time as required by 2 CFR 200.512. Recommendation – We recommend that the Organization maintain a system of policies, procedures, and controls to ensure that the financial records closed in a timely manner in order to facilitate the timely submission of the data collection form. View of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan – To enhance the efficiency and accuracy of financial reporting in a timely manner, the Organization will implement a detailed checklist and timeline for grant closeout procedures. The finance team will ensure expenditures meet the grant agreement schedule and follow the grant closeout guidelines. The procedures will be supported by a calendar reminder system for all critical milestones. This finding relates one legacy grant.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name: Across all programs Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Across all programs Pass-through Entity – Various Finding Type – Material weakness in internal control over compliance Repeat Finding – N/A Criteria – Per 2 CFR 200.512 (a) (1), the audit must be completed, and the data collection form described in paragraph (b) of this section and reporting package described in paragraph (c) of this section must be submitted within the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor's report(s), or nine months after the end of the audit period. Per 2 CFR 200.501 (b), a non-Federal entity that expends $750,000 or more during the non-Federal entity's fiscal year in Federal awards must have a single audit conducted in accordance with § 200.514. Condition – The data collection form was not submitted within the required time as required by 2 CFR 200.512 for the year ended March 31, 2024. Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed – N/A Questioned Costs – None Cause – Activities related to a certain Federal grant were not accurately monitored or tracked to ensure proper reporting, which in turn caused a delay in closing the books and records in a timely manner. Effect – The data collection form was not submitted within the required time as required by 2 CFR 200.512. Recommendation – We recommend that the Organization maintain a system of policies, procedures, and controls to ensure that the financial records closed in a timely manner in order to facilitate the timely submission of the data collection form. View of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan – To enhance the efficiency and accuracy of financial reporting in a timely manner, the Organization will implement a detailed checklist and timeline for grant closeout procedures. The finance team will ensure expenditures meet the grant agreement schedule and follow the grant closeout guidelines. The procedures will be supported by a calendar reminder system for all critical milestones. This finding relates one legacy grant.
Federal Agency: United States Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program: Block Grants for Community Mental Health Services (93.958) Federal Award Numbers: 21B1NYCMHSC6; 22B1NYCMHS; 23B1NYCMHS Federal Award Years: 2021, 2022, and 2023 State Agency: Office of Mental Health Reference: 2024-009 Criteria Subrecipient monitoring Title 45 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 75 (45 CFR 75), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for HHS Awards, Section 352(a) states all pass-through entities must ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the following information at the time of the subaward and if any of these data elements change, include the changes in subsequent subaward modification. When some of this information is not available, the pass-through entity must provide the best information available to describe the Federal award and subaward. Required information include: 1. Federal Award Identification. i) Subrecipient name (which must match the name associated with its unique entity identifier; ii) Subrecipient’s unique entity identifier; iii) Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN); iv) Federal Award Date (see Section 75.2 Federal award date) of award to the recipient by the HHS awarding agency; v) Subaward Period of Performance Start and End Date; vi) Amount of Federal Funds Obligated by this action by the pass-through entity to the subrecipient; vii) Total Amount of Federal Funds Obligated to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity including the current obligation; viii) Total Amount of the Federal Award committed to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity; ix) Federal award project description, as required to be responsive to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA); x) Name of HHS awarding agency, pass-through entity, and contract information for awarding official of the pass-through entity; xi) sAssistance Listing Number (ALN) and Name; the pass-through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each Federal award and the ALN number at time of disbursement; xii) Identification of whether the award is R&D; and xiii) Indirect cost rate for the Federal award (including if the de minimis rate is charged per Section 75.414). 2. All requirements imposed by the pass-through entity on the subrecipient so that the Federal award is used in accordance with Federal statutes, regulations and the terms and conditions of the Federal award; 3. Any additional requirements that the pass-through entity imposes on the subrecipient in order for the pass- through entity to meet its own responsibility to the HHS awarding agency including identification of any required financial and performance reports; 4. An approved federally recognized indirect cost rate negotiated between the subrecipient and the Federal Government or, if no such rate exists, either a rate negotiated between the pass-through entity and the subrecipient (in compliance with this part), or a deminimis indirect cost rate as defined in § 75.414(f); 5. A requirement that the subrecipient permit the pass-through entity and auditors to have access to the subrecipient's records and financial statements as necessary for the pass-through entity to meet the requirements of this part; and 6. Appropriate terms and conditions concerning closeout of the subaward. Title 45 Code of Federal Regulations Part 75, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for HHS Awards (45 CFR 75), section 352(b) states all pass-through entities must evaluate each subrecipient's risk of noncompliance with Federal Statues, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring as described in paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section, which may include consideration of such factors as: 1. The subrecipient's prior experience with the same or similar subawards; 2. The results of previous audits including whether or not the subrecipient receives a Single Audit in accordance with subpart F, and the extent to which the same or similar subaward has been audited as a major program; 3. Whether the subrecipient has new personnel or new or substantially changed systems; and 4. The extent and results of HHS awarding agency monitoring (e.g., if the subrecipient also receives Federal awards directly from a HHS awarding agency). Additionally, 45 CFR 75.352(d) states all pass-through entities must monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: 1. Reviewing financial and performance reports required by the pass-through entity. 2. Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means. 3. Issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity as required by Section 75.521. 45 CFR 74.352(e) states depending upon the pass-through entity's assessment of risk posed by the sub recipient (as described in paragraph (b) of this section), the following monitoring tools may be useful for the pass-through entity to ensure proper accountability and compliance with program requirements and achievement of performance goals: 4. Providing subrecipients with training and technical assistance on program related matters; and 5. Performing on-site reviews of the subrecipient's program operations; 6. Arranging for agreed-upon-procedures engagements as described in § 75.425 Further, 45 CFR 75.352(f) states the pass-through entity must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of this part when it is expected that the subrecipient's Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in § 200.501. Internal controls Lastly, 45 CFR 75.303 (a) states the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal Entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in "Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government" issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the "Internal Control Integrated Framework", issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2024, the Office of Mental Health (the Office) passed through $62,549,685 under the Block Grants for Community Mental Health Services program, to local districts and providers (subrecipients) to provide programmatic and administrative services. As part of the funding arrangement, the local districts and providers (subrecipients) are responsible for carrying out the programmatic services and use the funds to provide comprehensive, community‐based mental health services to adults with serious mental illnesses and to children with serious emotional disturbances and to monitor progress in implementing a comprehensive, community based mental health system. Funds are used for prevention, treatment, recovery support, and other services to supplement Medicaid, Medicare, and private insurance services. When subawards are made to subrecipients, the pass-through entities are required to communicate certain award information. The Office’s policies and procedures are not designed to ensure that award notifications are provided to subrecipients as required by 45 CFR 75.352(a). During our testwork of 40 subrecipient award notifications, we noted the following: 1. For 4 subrecipients, the Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN) was not provided. 2. For 10 subrecipients, which are all New York State Counties, there was no notification of access to records. 3. For 17 of the subrecipients, there was no notification of the DUNS number. All pass-through entities are required to perform a risk assessment over each subrecipient’s risk of noncompliance for purposes of determining appropriate subrecipient monitoring procedures. The Office did not perform an annual risk assessment process related to its subrecipients as required by 45 CFR 75.352(b). Additionally, all pass-through entities must monitor the activities of the subrecipient which must include review of financial and performance reports, follow up to ensure the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on any deficiencies identified, and issue a management decision for audit findings. The Office did not monitor and retain documentation of review of financial and performance reports, follow up to ensure appropriate action on any deficiencies identified, nor issue a management decision for audit findings. Lastly, all pass-through entities are required to verify each subrecipient is audited, if required. The Office did not ensure that all required single audits of the program’s subrecipients were received, reviewed, followed-up, or appropriate action was taken and as necessary issued a management decision pertaining to the audit finding in accordance with 45 CFR 75, as applicable. Cause The condition found was due the timing of the implementation of the OMH corrective action plan for a finding that was identified in the previous fiscal year. The condition found was primarily due to the lack of written policies and procedures to ensure that: 1. all required award identification information per 45 CFR 75.352(a) is communicated to the subrecipients for each federal subaward period; 2. an appropriate risk assessment process is in place per 45 CFR 75.352(b); 3. during award monitoring procedures are performed per 45 CFR 75.352(d); and 4. review of the subrecipient single audit reports are performed per 45 CFR 75.352(f). Resource constraints have been a challenge throughout the current fiscal year, which prevented OMH from fully implementing its corrective action plan during this period. Possible Asserted Effect Failure to adequately communicate award identification information could result in the subrecipient not being able to adequately track and report the subawards received, resulting in errors being reported on the schedule of expenditures of federal awards within a subrecipient’s annual single audit report and not being able to comply with required terms and conditions of the federal award. Failure to perform an annual risk assessment to determine appropriate subrecipient monitoring procedures, failure to review financial and performance reports of subrecipients, as well as failure to obtain and review subrecipient single audit reports may result in insufficient monitoring procedures being performed to detect subrecipient noncompliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Questioned Costs Cannot be determined. Statistical Sampling The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was included in the 2023 Single Audit Report as finding number 2023-017 on pages 60-63. Recommendation We recommend that the Office enhance its processes and internal controls over its reporting to the subrecipients of the federal program to ensure all award identification information required under 45 CFR 75.352(a) is provided to the subrecipients of the Office as data elements change or funding is passed-through. We recommend that the Office implement policies, procedures, and internal controls to ensure that risk assessments of subrecipients are performed on an annual basis to determine appropriate monitoring of subrecipients is performed in accordance with 45 CFR 75.352(d) and 45 CFR 75.352(e). Lastly, we recommend that the Office implement policies, procedures, and internal controls to track and review all subrecipients’ single audit submissions per 45 CFR 75.252(f).
Condition: The Organization did not submit the audit and Data Collection form within the nine-month due date for the fiscal year 2023. Criteria: According to the OMB Circular A–133, Subpart B--Audits §___.200(a), and Uniform Guidance, 2 CFR 200.501(a), non-Federal entities that expend $750,000 or more in a year in Federal awards shall have a single or program-specific audit conducted for that year in accordance with the provisions of these parts. The audit must be completed, and the data collection form described in paragraph (b) of this section and reporting package described in paragraph (c) of this section must be submitted within the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor's report(s), or nine months after the end of the audit period. If the due date falls on a Saturday, Sunday, or Federal holiday, the reporting package is due the next business day. Questioned Costs: There are no questioned costs. Cause: The Organization has encountered staffing issues and consistency in the fiscal office over the past couple of years which has made it difficult for the management team to close the books in a timely manner and caused audit delays. Effect: Since the Organization submitted the audit and Data Collection form late, they are not in compliance with OMB Circular A–133, Subpart B--Audits §___.200(a), and Uniform Guidance, 2 CFR 200.501(a). Perspective: This is a systemic issue, in that controls over the requirement have not been developed to ensure no issues arise. Repeat Finding: This a repeat finding. Recommendation: RBT recommends the Organization develop a closing checklist and timeline so that the books are closed and the audit can be completed in a timely manner. Perspective: This is a systematic issue, in that controls over the requirement have not been developed to ensure no issues arise. Repeat: This is not a repeat finding. Responsible Offical's Response: The Organization agrees with the finding. See attached corrective action plan.
Condition: The Organization did not submit the audit and Data Collection form within the nine-month due date for the fiscal year 2023. Criteria: According to the OMB Circular A–133, Subpart B--Audits §___.200(a), and Uniform Guidance, 2 CFR 200.501(a), non-Federal entities that expend $750,000 or more in a year in Federal awards shall have a single or program-specific audit conducted for that year in accordance with the provisions of these parts. The audit must be completed, and the data collection form described in paragraph (b) of this section and reporting package described in paragraph (c) of this section must be submitted within the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor's report(s), or nine months after the end of the audit period. If the due date falls on a Saturday, Sunday, or Federal holiday, the reporting package is due the next business day. Questioned Costs: There are no questioned costs. Cause: The Organization has encountered staffing issues and consistency in the fiscal office over the past couple of years which has made it difficult for the management team to close the books in a timely manner and caused audit delays. Effect: Since the Organization submitted the audit and Data Collection form late, they are not in compliance with OMB Circular A–133, Subpart B--Audits §___.200(a), and Uniform Guidance, 2 CFR 200.501(a). Perspective: This is a systemic issue, in that controls over the requirement have not been developed to ensure no issues arise. Repeat Finding: This a repeat finding. Recommendation: RBT recommends the Organization develop a closing checklist and timeline so that the books are closed and the audit can be completed in a timely manner. Perspective: This is a systematic issue, in that controls over the requirement have not been developed to ensure no issues arise. Repeat: This is not a repeat finding. Responsible Offical's Response: The Organization agrees with the finding. See attached corrective action plan.
Condition: The Organization did not submit the audit and Data Collection form within the nine-month due date for the fiscal year 2023. Criteria: According to the OMB Circular A–133, Subpart B--Audits §___.200(a), and Uniform Guidance, 2 CFR 200.501(a), non-Federal entities that expend $750,000 or more in a year in Federal awards shall have a single or program-specific audit conducted for that year in accordance with the provisions of these parts. The audit must be completed, and the data collection form described in paragraph (b) of this section and reporting package described in paragraph (c) of this section must be submitted within the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor's report(s), or nine months after the end of the audit period. If the due date falls on a Saturday, Sunday, or Federal holiday, the reporting package is due the next business day. Questioned Costs: There are no questioned costs. Cause: The Organization has encountered staffing issues and consistency in the fiscal office over the past couple of years which has made it difficult for the management team to close the books in a timely manner and caused audit delays. Effect: Since the Organization submitted the audit and Data Collection form late, they are not in compliance with OMB Circular A–133, Subpart B--Audits §___.200(a), and Uniform Guidance, 2 CFR 200.501(a). Perspective: This is a systemic issue, in that controls over the requirement have not been developed to ensure no issues arise. Repeat Finding: This a repeat finding. Recommendation: RBT recommends the Organization develop a closing checklist and timeline so that the books are closed and the audit can be completed in a timely manner. Perspective: This is a systematic issue, in that controls over the requirement have not been developed to ensure no issues arise. Repeat: This is not a repeat finding. Responsible Offical's Response: The Organization agrees with the finding. See attached corrective action plan.
Condition: The Organization did not submit the audit and Data Collection form within the nine-month due date for the fiscal year 2023. Criteria: According to the OMB Circular A–133, Subpart B--Audits §___.200(a), and Uniform Guidance, 2 CFR 200.501(a), non-Federal entities that expend $750,000 or more in a year in Federal awards shall have a single or program-specific audit conducted for that year in accordance with the provisions of these parts. The audit must be completed, and the data collection form described in paragraph (b) of this section and reporting package described in paragraph (c) of this section must be submitted within the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor's report(s), or nine months after the end of the audit period. If the due date falls on a Saturday, Sunday, or Federal holiday, the reporting package is due the next business day. Questioned Costs: There are no questioned costs. Cause: The Organization has encountered staffing issues and consistency in the fiscal office over the past couple of years which has made it difficult for the management team to close the books in a timely manner and caused audit delays. Effect: Since the Organization submitted the audit and Data Collection form late, they are not in compliance with OMB Circular A–133, Subpart B--Audits §___.200(a), and Uniform Guidance, 2 CFR 200.501(a). Perspective: This is a systemic issue, in that controls over the requirement have not been developed to ensure no issues arise. Repeat Finding: This a repeat finding. Recommendation: RBT recommends the Organization develop a closing checklist and timeline so that the books are closed and the audit can be completed in a timely manner. Perspective: This is a systematic issue, in that controls over the requirement have not been developed to ensure no issues arise. Repeat: This is not a repeat finding. Responsible Offical's Response: The Organization agrees with the finding. See attached corrective action plan.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name: Across all programs Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Across all programs Pass-through Entity – Various Finding Type – Material weakness in internal control over compliance Repeat Finding – N/A Criteria – Per 2 CFR 200.512 (a) (1), the audit must be completed, and the data collection form described in paragraph (b) of this section and reporting package described in paragraph (c) of this section must be submitted within the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor's report(s), or nine months after the end of the audit period. Per 2 CFR 200.501 (b), a non-Federal entity that expends $750,000 or more during the non-Federal entity's fiscal year in Federal awards must have a single audit conducted in accordance with § 200.514. Condition – The data collection form was not submitted within the required time as required by 2 CFR 200.512 for the year ended March 31, 2024. Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed – N/A Questioned Costs – None Cause – Activities related to a certain Federal grant were not accurately monitored or tracked to ensure proper reporting, which in turn caused a delay in closing the books and records in a timely manner. Effect – The data collection form was not submitted within the required time as required by 2 CFR 200.512. Recommendation – We recommend that the Organization maintain a system of policies, procedures, and controls to ensure that the financial records closed in a timely manner in order to facilitate the timely submission of the data collection form. View of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan – To enhance the efficiency and accuracy of financial reporting in a timely manner, the Organization will implement a detailed checklist and timeline for grant closeout procedures. The finance team will ensure expenditures meet the grant agreement schedule and follow the grant closeout guidelines. The procedures will be supported by a calendar reminder system for all critical milestones. This finding relates one legacy grant.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name: Across all programs Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Across all programs Pass-through Entity – Various Finding Type – Material weakness in internal control over compliance Repeat Finding – N/A Criteria – Per 2 CFR 200.512 (a) (1), the audit must be completed, and the data collection form described in paragraph (b) of this section and reporting package described in paragraph (c) of this section must be submitted within the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor's report(s), or nine months after the end of the audit period. Per 2 CFR 200.501 (b), a non-Federal entity that expends $750,000 or more during the non-Federal entity's fiscal year in Federal awards must have a single audit conducted in accordance with § 200.514. Condition – The data collection form was not submitted within the required time as required by 2 CFR 200.512 for the year ended March 31, 2024. Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed – N/A Questioned Costs – None Cause – Activities related to a certain Federal grant were not accurately monitored or tracked to ensure proper reporting, which in turn caused a delay in closing the books and records in a timely manner. Effect – The data collection form was not submitted within the required time as required by 2 CFR 200.512. Recommendation – We recommend that the Organization maintain a system of policies, procedures, and controls to ensure that the financial records closed in a timely manner in order to facilitate the timely submission of the data collection form. View of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan – To enhance the efficiency and accuracy of financial reporting in a timely manner, the Organization will implement a detailed checklist and timeline for grant closeout procedures. The finance team will ensure expenditures meet the grant agreement schedule and follow the grant closeout guidelines. The procedures will be supported by a calendar reminder system for all critical milestones. This finding relates one legacy grant.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name: Across all programs Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Across all programs Pass-through Entity – Various Finding Type – Material weakness in internal control over compliance Repeat Finding – N/A Criteria – Per 2 CFR 200.512 (a) (1), the audit must be completed, and the data collection form described in paragraph (b) of this section and reporting package described in paragraph (c) of this section must be submitted within the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor's report(s), or nine months after the end of the audit period. Per 2 CFR 200.501 (b), a non-Federal entity that expends $750,000 or more during the non-Federal entity's fiscal year in Federal awards must have a single audit conducted in accordance with § 200.514. Condition – The data collection form was not submitted within the required time as required by 2 CFR 200.512 for the year ended March 31, 2024. Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed – N/A Questioned Costs – None Cause – Activities related to a certain Federal grant were not accurately monitored or tracked to ensure proper reporting, which in turn caused a delay in closing the books and records in a timely manner. Effect – The data collection form was not submitted within the required time as required by 2 CFR 200.512. Recommendation – We recommend that the Organization maintain a system of policies, procedures, and controls to ensure that the financial records closed in a timely manner in order to facilitate the timely submission of the data collection form. View of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan – To enhance the efficiency and accuracy of financial reporting in a timely manner, the Organization will implement a detailed checklist and timeline for grant closeout procedures. The finance team will ensure expenditures meet the grant agreement schedule and follow the grant closeout guidelines. The procedures will be supported by a calendar reminder system for all critical milestones. This finding relates one legacy grant.