2024-001 – Subrecipient Monitoring Cluster: Research and Development Cluster (“R&D Cluster”) Grantor: Various - All R&D Cluster awards with subrecipients Award Name: Various - All R&D Cluster awards with subrecipients Award Year: FY2024 Assistance Listing Number: Various – All R&D Cluster awards with subrecipients Pass-through entities and ID Number: Various - All R&D Cluster awards with subrecipients Condition The University has a detailed pre-award risk assessment process prior to entering into a subrecipient relationship, which includes review of subrecipient Uniform Guidance reports. Subsequent review of Uniform Guidance reports for monitoring purposes is completed at the time of a subaward amendment. However, subawards are not always amended within a year, which creates a potential gap in review. In the FY2023 audit, 4 out of the 25 subaward selections did not have a Uniform Guidance report review or other monitoring review during the year, which resulted in a reportable finding. In FY2024, in response to the FY2023 finding in subrecipient monitoring (2023-001), the University implemented an annual Post-Award review of all subrecipient Uniform Guidance reports. This review documented the report information, findings noted, and follow-up performed with the subrecipient, as necessary. However, this consolidated review was deemed to be incomplete, as 1 of the 25 subrecipient selections was not included in the Post-Award review of all subrecipient Uniform Guidance reports. Management subsequently reviewed the completeness of the consolidated review, and determined a total of 12 subrecipients were not monitored in FY2024. Criteria 2 CFR 200.332(d) notes that pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: • Reviewing financial and performance reports required by the pass-through entity. • Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity detected through audits, on-site reviews, and written confirmation from the subrecipient, highlighting the status of actions planned or taken to address Single Audit findings related to the particular subaward. • Issuing a management decision for applicable audit findings pertaining only to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity as required by 2 CFR 200.521. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.332(f) notes that a pass-through entity must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by the Uniform Guidance when it is expected that the subrecipient's Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in 2 CFR 200.501. Cause In compiling the consolidated analysis of all subrecipients with active funding during the fiscal year, the Post-Award team utilized reporting of subrecipient expenditures from the general ledger. This report inadvertently omitted a period of time during the fiscal year, which caused omission of select subrecipients from the consolidated Post-Award analysis. Effect The lack of an annual review of subrecipient Uniform Guidance reports may result in potential compliance issues not being identified and management not addressing findings and issuing a management decision, as required under the Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs There are no questioned costs associated with this finding. Through audit procedures, there was no evidence of non-compliance from subrecipients. Recommendation We recommend the University address the completeness of their consolidated subrecipient monitoring through review of the reports used to compile the analysis. Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan Management’s response is included in “Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan” included at the end of this report after the summary schedule of status of prior audit findings
2024-001 – Subrecipient Monitoring Cluster: Research and Development Cluster (“R&D Cluster”) Grantor: Various - All R&D Cluster awards with subrecipients Award Name: Various - All R&D Cluster awards with subrecipients Award Year: FY2024 Assistance Listing Number: Various – All R&D Cluster awards with subrecipients Pass-through entities and ID Number: Various - All R&D Cluster awards with subrecipients Condition The University has a detailed pre-award risk assessment process prior to entering into a subrecipient relationship, which includes review of subrecipient Uniform Guidance reports. Subsequent review of Uniform Guidance reports for monitoring purposes is completed at the time of a subaward amendment. However, subawards are not always amended within a year, which creates a potential gap in review. In the FY2023 audit, 4 out of the 25 subaward selections did not have a Uniform Guidance report review or other monitoring review during the year, which resulted in a reportable finding. In FY2024, in response to the FY2023 finding in subrecipient monitoring (2023-001), the University implemented an annual Post-Award review of all subrecipient Uniform Guidance reports. This review documented the report information, findings noted, and follow-up performed with the subrecipient, as necessary. However, this consolidated review was deemed to be incomplete, as 1 of the 25 subrecipient selections was not included in the Post-Award review of all subrecipient Uniform Guidance reports. Management subsequently reviewed the completeness of the consolidated review, and determined a total of 12 subrecipients were not monitored in FY2024. Criteria 2 CFR 200.332(d) notes that pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: • Reviewing financial and performance reports required by the pass-through entity. • Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity detected through audits, on-site reviews, and written confirmation from the subrecipient, highlighting the status of actions planned or taken to address Single Audit findings related to the particular subaward. • Issuing a management decision for applicable audit findings pertaining only to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity as required by 2 CFR 200.521. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.332(f) notes that a pass-through entity must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by the Uniform Guidance when it is expected that the subrecipient's Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in 2 CFR 200.501. Cause In compiling the consolidated analysis of all subrecipients with active funding during the fiscal year, the Post-Award team utilized reporting of subrecipient expenditures from the general ledger. This report inadvertently omitted a period of time during the fiscal year, which caused omission of select subrecipients from the consolidated Post-Award analysis. Effect The lack of an annual review of subrecipient Uniform Guidance reports may result in potential compliance issues not being identified and management not addressing findings and issuing a management decision, as required under the Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs There are no questioned costs associated with this finding. Through audit procedures, there was no evidence of non-compliance from subrecipients. Recommendation We recommend the University address the completeness of their consolidated subrecipient monitoring through review of the reports used to compile the analysis. Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan Management’s response is included in “Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan” included at the end of this report after the summary schedule of status of prior audit findings
2024-001 – Subrecipient Monitoring Cluster: Research and Development Cluster (“R&D Cluster”) Grantor: Various - All R&D Cluster awards with subrecipients Award Name: Various - All R&D Cluster awards with subrecipients Award Year: FY2024 Assistance Listing Number: Various – All R&D Cluster awards with subrecipients Pass-through entities and ID Number: Various - All R&D Cluster awards with subrecipients Condition The University has a detailed pre-award risk assessment process prior to entering into a subrecipient relationship, which includes review of subrecipient Uniform Guidance reports. Subsequent review of Uniform Guidance reports for monitoring purposes is completed at the time of a subaward amendment. However, subawards are not always amended within a year, which creates a potential gap in review. In the FY2023 audit, 4 out of the 25 subaward selections did not have a Uniform Guidance report review or other monitoring review during the year, which resulted in a reportable finding. In FY2024, in response to the FY2023 finding in subrecipient monitoring (2023-001), the University implemented an annual Post-Award review of all subrecipient Uniform Guidance reports. This review documented the report information, findings noted, and follow-up performed with the subrecipient, as necessary. However, this consolidated review was deemed to be incomplete, as 1 of the 25 subrecipient selections was not included in the Post-Award review of all subrecipient Uniform Guidance reports. Management subsequently reviewed the completeness of the consolidated review, and determined a total of 12 subrecipients were not monitored in FY2024. Criteria 2 CFR 200.332(d) notes that pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: • Reviewing financial and performance reports required by the pass-through entity. • Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity detected through audits, on-site reviews, and written confirmation from the subrecipient, highlighting the status of actions planned or taken to address Single Audit findings related to the particular subaward. • Issuing a management decision for applicable audit findings pertaining only to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity as required by 2 CFR 200.521. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.332(f) notes that a pass-through entity must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by the Uniform Guidance when it is expected that the subrecipient's Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in 2 CFR 200.501. Cause In compiling the consolidated analysis of all subrecipients with active funding during the fiscal year, the Post-Award team utilized reporting of subrecipient expenditures from the general ledger. This report inadvertently omitted a period of time during the fiscal year, which caused omission of select subrecipients from the consolidated Post-Award analysis. Effect The lack of an annual review of subrecipient Uniform Guidance reports may result in potential compliance issues not being identified and management not addressing findings and issuing a management decision, as required under the Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs There are no questioned costs associated with this finding. Through audit procedures, there was no evidence of non-compliance from subrecipients. Recommendation We recommend the University address the completeness of their consolidated subrecipient monitoring through review of the reports used to compile the analysis. Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan Management’s response is included in “Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan” included at the end of this report after the summary schedule of status of prior audit findings
2024-001 – Subrecipient Monitoring Cluster: Research and Development Cluster (“R&D Cluster”) Grantor: Various - All R&D Cluster awards with subrecipients Award Name: Various - All R&D Cluster awards with subrecipients Award Year: FY2024 Assistance Listing Number: Various – All R&D Cluster awards with subrecipients Pass-through entities and ID Number: Various - All R&D Cluster awards with subrecipients Condition The University has a detailed pre-award risk assessment process prior to entering into a subrecipient relationship, which includes review of subrecipient Uniform Guidance reports. Subsequent review of Uniform Guidance reports for monitoring purposes is completed at the time of a subaward amendment. However, subawards are not always amended within a year, which creates a potential gap in review. In the FY2023 audit, 4 out of the 25 subaward selections did not have a Uniform Guidance report review or other monitoring review during the year, which resulted in a reportable finding. In FY2024, in response to the FY2023 finding in subrecipient monitoring (2023-001), the University implemented an annual Post-Award review of all subrecipient Uniform Guidance reports. This review documented the report information, findings noted, and follow-up performed with the subrecipient, as necessary. However, this consolidated review was deemed to be incomplete, as 1 of the 25 subrecipient selections was not included in the Post-Award review of all subrecipient Uniform Guidance reports. Management subsequently reviewed the completeness of the consolidated review, and determined a total of 12 subrecipients were not monitored in FY2024. Criteria 2 CFR 200.332(d) notes that pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: • Reviewing financial and performance reports required by the pass-through entity. • Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity detected through audits, on-site reviews, and written confirmation from the subrecipient, highlighting the status of actions planned or taken to address Single Audit findings related to the particular subaward. • Issuing a management decision for applicable audit findings pertaining only to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity as required by 2 CFR 200.521. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.332(f) notes that a pass-through entity must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by the Uniform Guidance when it is expected that the subrecipient's Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in 2 CFR 200.501. Cause In compiling the consolidated analysis of all subrecipients with active funding during the fiscal year, the Post-Award team utilized reporting of subrecipient expenditures from the general ledger. This report inadvertently omitted a period of time during the fiscal year, which caused omission of select subrecipients from the consolidated Post-Award analysis. Effect The lack of an annual review of subrecipient Uniform Guidance reports may result in potential compliance issues not being identified and management not addressing findings and issuing a management decision, as required under the Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs There are no questioned costs associated with this finding. Through audit procedures, there was no evidence of non-compliance from subrecipients. Recommendation We recommend the University address the completeness of their consolidated subrecipient monitoring through review of the reports used to compile the analysis. Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan Management’s response is included in “Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan” included at the end of this report after the summary schedule of status of prior audit findings
2024-001 – Subrecipient Monitoring Cluster: Research and Development Cluster (“R&D Cluster”) Grantor: Various - All R&D Cluster awards with subrecipients Award Name: Various - All R&D Cluster awards with subrecipients Award Year: FY2024 Assistance Listing Number: Various – All R&D Cluster awards with subrecipients Pass-through entities and ID Number: Various - All R&D Cluster awards with subrecipients Condition The University has a detailed pre-award risk assessment process prior to entering into a subrecipient relationship, which includes review of subrecipient Uniform Guidance reports. Subsequent review of Uniform Guidance reports for monitoring purposes is completed at the time of a subaward amendment. However, subawards are not always amended within a year, which creates a potential gap in review. In the FY2023 audit, 4 out of the 25 subaward selections did not have a Uniform Guidance report review or other monitoring review during the year, which resulted in a reportable finding. In FY2024, in response to the FY2023 finding in subrecipient monitoring (2023-001), the University implemented an annual Post-Award review of all subrecipient Uniform Guidance reports. This review documented the report information, findings noted, and follow-up performed with the subrecipient, as necessary. However, this consolidated review was deemed to be incomplete, as 1 of the 25 subrecipient selections was not included in the Post-Award review of all subrecipient Uniform Guidance reports. Management subsequently reviewed the completeness of the consolidated review, and determined a total of 12 subrecipients were not monitored in FY2024. Criteria 2 CFR 200.332(d) notes that pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: • Reviewing financial and performance reports required by the pass-through entity. • Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity detected through audits, on-site reviews, and written confirmation from the subrecipient, highlighting the status of actions planned or taken to address Single Audit findings related to the particular subaward. • Issuing a management decision for applicable audit findings pertaining only to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity as required by 2 CFR 200.521. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.332(f) notes that a pass-through entity must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by the Uniform Guidance when it is expected that the subrecipient's Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in 2 CFR 200.501. Cause In compiling the consolidated analysis of all subrecipients with active funding during the fiscal year, the Post-Award team utilized reporting of subrecipient expenditures from the general ledger. This report inadvertently omitted a period of time during the fiscal year, which caused omission of select subrecipients from the consolidated Post-Award analysis. Effect The lack of an annual review of subrecipient Uniform Guidance reports may result in potential compliance issues not being identified and management not addressing findings and issuing a management decision, as required under the Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs There are no questioned costs associated with this finding. Through audit procedures, there was no evidence of non-compliance from subrecipients. Recommendation We recommend the University address the completeness of their consolidated subrecipient monitoring through review of the reports used to compile the analysis. Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan Management’s response is included in “Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan” included at the end of this report after the summary schedule of status of prior audit findings
2024-001 – Subrecipient Monitoring Cluster: Research and Development Cluster (“R&D Cluster”) Grantor: Various - All R&D Cluster awards with subrecipients Award Name: Various - All R&D Cluster awards with subrecipients Award Year: FY2024 Assistance Listing Number: Various – All R&D Cluster awards with subrecipients Pass-through entities and ID Number: Various - All R&D Cluster awards with subrecipients Condition The University has a detailed pre-award risk assessment process prior to entering into a subrecipient relationship, which includes review of subrecipient Uniform Guidance reports. Subsequent review of Uniform Guidance reports for monitoring purposes is completed at the time of a subaward amendment. However, subawards are not always amended within a year, which creates a potential gap in review. In the FY2023 audit, 4 out of the 25 subaward selections did not have a Uniform Guidance report review or other monitoring review during the year, which resulted in a reportable finding. In FY2024, in response to the FY2023 finding in subrecipient monitoring (2023-001), the University implemented an annual Post-Award review of all subrecipient Uniform Guidance reports. This review documented the report information, findings noted, and follow-up performed with the subrecipient, as necessary. However, this consolidated review was deemed to be incomplete, as 1 of the 25 subrecipient selections was not included in the Post-Award review of all subrecipient Uniform Guidance reports. Management subsequently reviewed the completeness of the consolidated review, and determined a total of 12 subrecipients were not monitored in FY2024. Criteria 2 CFR 200.332(d) notes that pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: • Reviewing financial and performance reports required by the pass-through entity. • Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity detected through audits, on-site reviews, and written confirmation from the subrecipient, highlighting the status of actions planned or taken to address Single Audit findings related to the particular subaward. • Issuing a management decision for applicable audit findings pertaining only to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity as required by 2 CFR 200.521. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.332(f) notes that a pass-through entity must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by the Uniform Guidance when it is expected that the subrecipient's Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in 2 CFR 200.501. Cause In compiling the consolidated analysis of all subrecipients with active funding during the fiscal year, the Post-Award team utilized reporting of subrecipient expenditures from the general ledger. This report inadvertently omitted a period of time during the fiscal year, which caused omission of select subrecipients from the consolidated Post-Award analysis. Effect The lack of an annual review of subrecipient Uniform Guidance reports may result in potential compliance issues not being identified and management not addressing findings and issuing a management decision, as required under the Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs There are no questioned costs associated with this finding. Through audit procedures, there was no evidence of non-compliance from subrecipients. Recommendation We recommend the University address the completeness of their consolidated subrecipient monitoring through review of the reports used to compile the analysis. Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan Management’s response is included in “Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan” included at the end of this report after the summary schedule of status of prior audit findings
2024-001 – Subrecipient Monitoring Cluster: Research and Development Cluster (“R&D Cluster”) Grantor: Various - All R&D Cluster awards with subrecipients Award Name: Various - All R&D Cluster awards with subrecipients Award Year: FY2024 Assistance Listing Number: Various – All R&D Cluster awards with subrecipients Pass-through entities and ID Number: Various - All R&D Cluster awards with subrecipients Condition The University has a detailed pre-award risk assessment process prior to entering into a subrecipient relationship, which includes review of subrecipient Uniform Guidance reports. Subsequent review of Uniform Guidance reports for monitoring purposes is completed at the time of a subaward amendment. However, subawards are not always amended within a year, which creates a potential gap in review. In the FY2023 audit, 4 out of the 25 subaward selections did not have a Uniform Guidance report review or other monitoring review during the year, which resulted in a reportable finding. In FY2024, in response to the FY2023 finding in subrecipient monitoring (2023-001), the University implemented an annual Post-Award review of all subrecipient Uniform Guidance reports. This review documented the report information, findings noted, and follow-up performed with the subrecipient, as necessary. However, this consolidated review was deemed to be incomplete, as 1 of the 25 subrecipient selections was not included in the Post-Award review of all subrecipient Uniform Guidance reports. Management subsequently reviewed the completeness of the consolidated review, and determined a total of 12 subrecipients were not monitored in FY2024. Criteria 2 CFR 200.332(d) notes that pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: • Reviewing financial and performance reports required by the pass-through entity. • Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity detected through audits, on-site reviews, and written confirmation from the subrecipient, highlighting the status of actions planned or taken to address Single Audit findings related to the particular subaward. • Issuing a management decision for applicable audit findings pertaining only to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity as required by 2 CFR 200.521. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.332(f) notes that a pass-through entity must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by the Uniform Guidance when it is expected that the subrecipient's Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in 2 CFR 200.501. Cause In compiling the consolidated analysis of all subrecipients with active funding during the fiscal year, the Post-Award team utilized reporting of subrecipient expenditures from the general ledger. This report inadvertently omitted a period of time during the fiscal year, which caused omission of select subrecipients from the consolidated Post-Award analysis. Effect The lack of an annual review of subrecipient Uniform Guidance reports may result in potential compliance issues not being identified and management not addressing findings and issuing a management decision, as required under the Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs There are no questioned costs associated with this finding. Through audit procedures, there was no evidence of non-compliance from subrecipients. Recommendation We recommend the University address the completeness of their consolidated subrecipient monitoring through review of the reports used to compile the analysis. Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan Management’s response is included in “Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan” included at the end of this report after the summary schedule of status of prior audit findings
2024-001 – Subrecipient Monitoring Cluster: Research and Development Cluster (“R&D Cluster”) Grantor: Various - All R&D Cluster awards with subrecipients Award Name: Various - All R&D Cluster awards with subrecipients Award Year: FY2024 Assistance Listing Number: Various – All R&D Cluster awards with subrecipients Pass-through entities and ID Number: Various - All R&D Cluster awards with subrecipients Condition The University has a detailed pre-award risk assessment process prior to entering into a subrecipient relationship, which includes review of subrecipient Uniform Guidance reports. Subsequent review of Uniform Guidance reports for monitoring purposes is completed at the time of a subaward amendment. However, subawards are not always amended within a year, which creates a potential gap in review. In the FY2023 audit, 4 out of the 25 subaward selections did not have a Uniform Guidance report review or other monitoring review during the year, which resulted in a reportable finding. In FY2024, in response to the FY2023 finding in subrecipient monitoring (2023-001), the University implemented an annual Post-Award review of all subrecipient Uniform Guidance reports. This review documented the report information, findings noted, and follow-up performed with the subrecipient, as necessary. However, this consolidated review was deemed to be incomplete, as 1 of the 25 subrecipient selections was not included in the Post-Award review of all subrecipient Uniform Guidance reports. Management subsequently reviewed the completeness of the consolidated review, and determined a total of 12 subrecipients were not monitored in FY2024. Criteria 2 CFR 200.332(d) notes that pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: • Reviewing financial and performance reports required by the pass-through entity. • Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity detected through audits, on-site reviews, and written confirmation from the subrecipient, highlighting the status of actions planned or taken to address Single Audit findings related to the particular subaward. • Issuing a management decision for applicable audit findings pertaining only to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity as required by 2 CFR 200.521. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.332(f) notes that a pass-through entity must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by the Uniform Guidance when it is expected that the subrecipient's Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in 2 CFR 200.501. Cause In compiling the consolidated analysis of all subrecipients with active funding during the fiscal year, the Post-Award team utilized reporting of subrecipient expenditures from the general ledger. This report inadvertently omitted a period of time during the fiscal year, which caused omission of select subrecipients from the consolidated Post-Award analysis. Effect The lack of an annual review of subrecipient Uniform Guidance reports may result in potential compliance issues not being identified and management not addressing findings and issuing a management decision, as required under the Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs There are no questioned costs associated with this finding. Through audit procedures, there was no evidence of non-compliance from subrecipients. Recommendation We recommend the University address the completeness of their consolidated subrecipient monitoring through review of the reports used to compile the analysis. Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan Management’s response is included in “Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan” included at the end of this report after the summary schedule of status of prior audit findings
2024-001 – Subrecipient Monitoring Cluster: Research and Development Cluster (“R&D Cluster”) Grantor: Various - All R&D Cluster awards with subrecipients Award Name: Various - All R&D Cluster awards with subrecipients Award Year: FY2024 Assistance Listing Number: Various – All R&D Cluster awards with subrecipients Pass-through entities and ID Number: Various - All R&D Cluster awards with subrecipients Condition The University has a detailed pre-award risk assessment process prior to entering into a subrecipient relationship, which includes review of subrecipient Uniform Guidance reports. Subsequent review of Uniform Guidance reports for monitoring purposes is completed at the time of a subaward amendment. However, subawards are not always amended within a year, which creates a potential gap in review. In the FY2023 audit, 4 out of the 25 subaward selections did not have a Uniform Guidance report review or other monitoring review during the year, which resulted in a reportable finding. In FY2024, in response to the FY2023 finding in subrecipient monitoring (2023-001), the University implemented an annual Post-Award review of all subrecipient Uniform Guidance reports. This review documented the report information, findings noted, and follow-up performed with the subrecipient, as necessary. However, this consolidated review was deemed to be incomplete, as 1 of the 25 subrecipient selections was not included in the Post-Award review of all subrecipient Uniform Guidance reports. Management subsequently reviewed the completeness of the consolidated review, and determined a total of 12 subrecipients were not monitored in FY2024. Criteria 2 CFR 200.332(d) notes that pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: • Reviewing financial and performance reports required by the pass-through entity. • Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity detected through audits, on-site reviews, and written confirmation from the subrecipient, highlighting the status of actions planned or taken to address Single Audit findings related to the particular subaward. • Issuing a management decision for applicable audit findings pertaining only to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity as required by 2 CFR 200.521. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.332(f) notes that a pass-through entity must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by the Uniform Guidance when it is expected that the subrecipient's Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in 2 CFR 200.501. Cause In compiling the consolidated analysis of all subrecipients with active funding during the fiscal year, the Post-Award team utilized reporting of subrecipient expenditures from the general ledger. This report inadvertently omitted a period of time during the fiscal year, which caused omission of select subrecipients from the consolidated Post-Award analysis. Effect The lack of an annual review of subrecipient Uniform Guidance reports may result in potential compliance issues not being identified and management not addressing findings and issuing a management decision, as required under the Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs There are no questioned costs associated with this finding. Through audit procedures, there was no evidence of non-compliance from subrecipients. Recommendation We recommend the University address the completeness of their consolidated subrecipient monitoring through review of the reports used to compile the analysis. Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan Management’s response is included in “Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan” included at the end of this report after the summary schedule of status of prior audit findings
2024-001 – Subrecipient Monitoring Cluster: Research and Development Cluster (“R&D Cluster”) Grantor: Various - All R&D Cluster awards with subrecipients Award Name: Various - All R&D Cluster awards with subrecipients Award Year: FY2024 Assistance Listing Number: Various – All R&D Cluster awards with subrecipients Pass-through entities and ID Number: Various - All R&D Cluster awards with subrecipients Condition The University has a detailed pre-award risk assessment process prior to entering into a subrecipient relationship, which includes review of subrecipient Uniform Guidance reports. Subsequent review of Uniform Guidance reports for monitoring purposes is completed at the time of a subaward amendment. However, subawards are not always amended within a year, which creates a potential gap in review. In the FY2023 audit, 4 out of the 25 subaward selections did not have a Uniform Guidance report review or other monitoring review during the year, which resulted in a reportable finding. In FY2024, in response to the FY2023 finding in subrecipient monitoring (2023-001), the University implemented an annual Post-Award review of all subrecipient Uniform Guidance reports. This review documented the report information, findings noted, and follow-up performed with the subrecipient, as necessary. However, this consolidated review was deemed to be incomplete, as 1 of the 25 subrecipient selections was not included in the Post-Award review of all subrecipient Uniform Guidance reports. Management subsequently reviewed the completeness of the consolidated review, and determined a total of 12 subrecipients were not monitored in FY2024. Criteria 2 CFR 200.332(d) notes that pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: • Reviewing financial and performance reports required by the pass-through entity. • Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity detected through audits, on-site reviews, and written confirmation from the subrecipient, highlighting the status of actions planned or taken to address Single Audit findings related to the particular subaward. • Issuing a management decision for applicable audit findings pertaining only to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity as required by 2 CFR 200.521. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.332(f) notes that a pass-through entity must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by the Uniform Guidance when it is expected that the subrecipient's Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in 2 CFR 200.501. Cause In compiling the consolidated analysis of all subrecipients with active funding during the fiscal year, the Post-Award team utilized reporting of subrecipient expenditures from the general ledger. This report inadvertently omitted a period of time during the fiscal year, which caused omission of select subrecipients from the consolidated Post-Award analysis. Effect The lack of an annual review of subrecipient Uniform Guidance reports may result in potential compliance issues not being identified and management not addressing findings and issuing a management decision, as required under the Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs There are no questioned costs associated with this finding. Through audit procedures, there was no evidence of non-compliance from subrecipients. Recommendation We recommend the University address the completeness of their consolidated subrecipient monitoring through review of the reports used to compile the analysis. Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan Management’s response is included in “Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan” included at the end of this report after the summary schedule of status of prior audit findings
2024-001 – Subrecipient Monitoring Cluster: Research and Development Cluster (“R&D Cluster”) Grantor: Various - All R&D Cluster awards with subrecipients Award Name: Various - All R&D Cluster awards with subrecipients Award Year: FY2024 Assistance Listing Number: Various – All R&D Cluster awards with subrecipients Pass-through entities and ID Number: Various - All R&D Cluster awards with subrecipients Condition The University has a detailed pre-award risk assessment process prior to entering into a subrecipient relationship, which includes review of subrecipient Uniform Guidance reports. Subsequent review of Uniform Guidance reports for monitoring purposes is completed at the time of a subaward amendment. However, subawards are not always amended within a year, which creates a potential gap in review. In the FY2023 audit, 4 out of the 25 subaward selections did not have a Uniform Guidance report review or other monitoring review during the year, which resulted in a reportable finding. In FY2024, in response to the FY2023 finding in subrecipient monitoring (2023-001), the University implemented an annual Post-Award review of all subrecipient Uniform Guidance reports. This review documented the report information, findings noted, and follow-up performed with the subrecipient, as necessary. However, this consolidated review was deemed to be incomplete, as 1 of the 25 subrecipient selections was not included in the Post-Award review of all subrecipient Uniform Guidance reports. Management subsequently reviewed the completeness of the consolidated review, and determined a total of 12 subrecipients were not monitored in FY2024. Criteria 2 CFR 200.332(d) notes that pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: • Reviewing financial and performance reports required by the pass-through entity. • Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity detected through audits, on-site reviews, and written confirmation from the subrecipient, highlighting the status of actions planned or taken to address Single Audit findings related to the particular subaward. • Issuing a management decision for applicable audit findings pertaining only to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity as required by 2 CFR 200.521. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.332(f) notes that a pass-through entity must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by the Uniform Guidance when it is expected that the subrecipient's Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in 2 CFR 200.501. Cause In compiling the consolidated analysis of all subrecipients with active funding during the fiscal year, the Post-Award team utilized reporting of subrecipient expenditures from the general ledger. This report inadvertently omitted a period of time during the fiscal year, which caused omission of select subrecipients from the consolidated Post-Award analysis. Effect The lack of an annual review of subrecipient Uniform Guidance reports may result in potential compliance issues not being identified and management not addressing findings and issuing a management decision, as required under the Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs There are no questioned costs associated with this finding. Through audit procedures, there was no evidence of non-compliance from subrecipients. Recommendation We recommend the University address the completeness of their consolidated subrecipient monitoring through review of the reports used to compile the analysis. Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan Management’s response is included in “Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan” included at the end of this report after the summary schedule of status of prior audit findings
2024-001 – Subrecipient Monitoring Cluster: Research and Development Cluster (“R&D Cluster”) Grantor: Various - All R&D Cluster awards with subrecipients Award Name: Various - All R&D Cluster awards with subrecipients Award Year: FY2024 Assistance Listing Number: Various – All R&D Cluster awards with subrecipients Pass-through entities and ID Number: Various - All R&D Cluster awards with subrecipients Condition The University has a detailed pre-award risk assessment process prior to entering into a subrecipient relationship, which includes review of subrecipient Uniform Guidance reports. Subsequent review of Uniform Guidance reports for monitoring purposes is completed at the time of a subaward amendment. However, subawards are not always amended within a year, which creates a potential gap in review. In the FY2023 audit, 4 out of the 25 subaward selections did not have a Uniform Guidance report review or other monitoring review during the year, which resulted in a reportable finding. In FY2024, in response to the FY2023 finding in subrecipient monitoring (2023-001), the University implemented an annual Post-Award review of all subrecipient Uniform Guidance reports. This review documented the report information, findings noted, and follow-up performed with the subrecipient, as necessary. However, this consolidated review was deemed to be incomplete, as 1 of the 25 subrecipient selections was not included in the Post-Award review of all subrecipient Uniform Guidance reports. Management subsequently reviewed the completeness of the consolidated review, and determined a total of 12 subrecipients were not monitored in FY2024. Criteria 2 CFR 200.332(d) notes that pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: • Reviewing financial and performance reports required by the pass-through entity. • Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity detected through audits, on-site reviews, and written confirmation from the subrecipient, highlighting the status of actions planned or taken to address Single Audit findings related to the particular subaward. • Issuing a management decision for applicable audit findings pertaining only to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity as required by 2 CFR 200.521. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.332(f) notes that a pass-through entity must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by the Uniform Guidance when it is expected that the subrecipient's Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in 2 CFR 200.501. Cause In compiling the consolidated analysis of all subrecipients with active funding during the fiscal year, the Post-Award team utilized reporting of subrecipient expenditures from the general ledger. This report inadvertently omitted a period of time during the fiscal year, which caused omission of select subrecipients from the consolidated Post-Award analysis. Effect The lack of an annual review of subrecipient Uniform Guidance reports may result in potential compliance issues not being identified and management not addressing findings and issuing a management decision, as required under the Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs There are no questioned costs associated with this finding. Through audit procedures, there was no evidence of non-compliance from subrecipients. Recommendation We recommend the University address the completeness of their consolidated subrecipient monitoring through review of the reports used to compile the analysis. Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan Management’s response is included in “Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan” included at the end of this report after the summary schedule of status of prior audit findings
2024-001 – Subrecipient Monitoring Cluster: Research and Development Cluster (“R&D Cluster”) Grantor: Various - All R&D Cluster awards with subrecipients Award Name: Various - All R&D Cluster awards with subrecipients Award Year: FY2024 Assistance Listing Number: Various – All R&D Cluster awards with subrecipients Pass-through entities and ID Number: Various - All R&D Cluster awards with subrecipients Condition The University has a detailed pre-award risk assessment process prior to entering into a subrecipient relationship, which includes review of subrecipient Uniform Guidance reports. Subsequent review of Uniform Guidance reports for monitoring purposes is completed at the time of a subaward amendment. However, subawards are not always amended within a year, which creates a potential gap in review. In the FY2023 audit, 4 out of the 25 subaward selections did not have a Uniform Guidance report review or other monitoring review during the year, which resulted in a reportable finding. In FY2024, in response to the FY2023 finding in subrecipient monitoring (2023-001), the University implemented an annual Post-Award review of all subrecipient Uniform Guidance reports. This review documented the report information, findings noted, and follow-up performed with the subrecipient, as necessary. However, this consolidated review was deemed to be incomplete, as 1 of the 25 subrecipient selections was not included in the Post-Award review of all subrecipient Uniform Guidance reports. Management subsequently reviewed the completeness of the consolidated review, and determined a total of 12 subrecipients were not monitored in FY2024. Criteria 2 CFR 200.332(d) notes that pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: • Reviewing financial and performance reports required by the pass-through entity. • Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity detected through audits, on-site reviews, and written confirmation from the subrecipient, highlighting the status of actions planned or taken to address Single Audit findings related to the particular subaward. • Issuing a management decision for applicable audit findings pertaining only to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity as required by 2 CFR 200.521. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.332(f) notes that a pass-through entity must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by the Uniform Guidance when it is expected that the subrecipient's Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in 2 CFR 200.501. Cause In compiling the consolidated analysis of all subrecipients with active funding during the fiscal year, the Post-Award team utilized reporting of subrecipient expenditures from the general ledger. This report inadvertently omitted a period of time during the fiscal year, which caused omission of select subrecipients from the consolidated Post-Award analysis. Effect The lack of an annual review of subrecipient Uniform Guidance reports may result in potential compliance issues not being identified and management not addressing findings and issuing a management decision, as required under the Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs There are no questioned costs associated with this finding. Through audit procedures, there was no evidence of non-compliance from subrecipients. Recommendation We recommend the University address the completeness of their consolidated subrecipient monitoring through review of the reports used to compile the analysis. Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan Management’s response is included in “Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan” included at the end of this report after the summary schedule of status of prior audit findings
2024-001 – Subrecipient Monitoring Cluster: Research and Development Cluster (“R&D Cluster”) Grantor: Various - All R&D Cluster awards with subrecipients Award Name: Various - All R&D Cluster awards with subrecipients Award Year: FY2024 Assistance Listing Number: Various – All R&D Cluster awards with subrecipients Pass-through entities and ID Number: Various - All R&D Cluster awards with subrecipients Condition The University has a detailed pre-award risk assessment process prior to entering into a subrecipient relationship, which includes review of subrecipient Uniform Guidance reports. Subsequent review of Uniform Guidance reports for monitoring purposes is completed at the time of a subaward amendment. However, subawards are not always amended within a year, which creates a potential gap in review. In the FY2023 audit, 4 out of the 25 subaward selections did not have a Uniform Guidance report review or other monitoring review during the year, which resulted in a reportable finding. In FY2024, in response to the FY2023 finding in subrecipient monitoring (2023-001), the University implemented an annual Post-Award review of all subrecipient Uniform Guidance reports. This review documented the report information, findings noted, and follow-up performed with the subrecipient, as necessary. However, this consolidated review was deemed to be incomplete, as 1 of the 25 subrecipient selections was not included in the Post-Award review of all subrecipient Uniform Guidance reports. Management subsequently reviewed the completeness of the consolidated review, and determined a total of 12 subrecipients were not monitored in FY2024. Criteria 2 CFR 200.332(d) notes that pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: • Reviewing financial and performance reports required by the pass-through entity. • Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity detected through audits, on-site reviews, and written confirmation from the subrecipient, highlighting the status of actions planned or taken to address Single Audit findings related to the particular subaward. • Issuing a management decision for applicable audit findings pertaining only to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity as required by 2 CFR 200.521. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.332(f) notes that a pass-through entity must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by the Uniform Guidance when it is expected that the subrecipient's Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in 2 CFR 200.501. Cause In compiling the consolidated analysis of all subrecipients with active funding during the fiscal year, the Post-Award team utilized reporting of subrecipient expenditures from the general ledger. This report inadvertently omitted a period of time during the fiscal year, which caused omission of select subrecipients from the consolidated Post-Award analysis. Effect The lack of an annual review of subrecipient Uniform Guidance reports may result in potential compliance issues not being identified and management not addressing findings and issuing a management decision, as required under the Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs There are no questioned costs associated with this finding. Through audit procedures, there was no evidence of non-compliance from subrecipients. Recommendation We recommend the University address the completeness of their consolidated subrecipient monitoring through review of the reports used to compile the analysis. Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan Management’s response is included in “Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan” included at the end of this report after the summary schedule of status of prior audit findings
2024-001 – Subrecipient Monitoring Cluster: Research and Development Cluster (“R&D Cluster”) Grantor: Various - All R&D Cluster awards with subrecipients Award Name: Various - All R&D Cluster awards with subrecipients Award Year: FY2024 Assistance Listing Number: Various – All R&D Cluster awards with subrecipients Pass-through entities and ID Number: Various - All R&D Cluster awards with subrecipients Condition The University has a detailed pre-award risk assessment process prior to entering into a subrecipient relationship, which includes review of subrecipient Uniform Guidance reports. Subsequent review of Uniform Guidance reports for monitoring purposes is completed at the time of a subaward amendment. However, subawards are not always amended within a year, which creates a potential gap in review. In the FY2023 audit, 4 out of the 25 subaward selections did not have a Uniform Guidance report review or other monitoring review during the year, which resulted in a reportable finding. In FY2024, in response to the FY2023 finding in subrecipient monitoring (2023-001), the University implemented an annual Post-Award review of all subrecipient Uniform Guidance reports. This review documented the report information, findings noted, and follow-up performed with the subrecipient, as necessary. However, this consolidated review was deemed to be incomplete, as 1 of the 25 subrecipient selections was not included in the Post-Award review of all subrecipient Uniform Guidance reports. Management subsequently reviewed the completeness of the consolidated review, and determined a total of 12 subrecipients were not monitored in FY2024. Criteria 2 CFR 200.332(d) notes that pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: • Reviewing financial and performance reports required by the pass-through entity. • Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity detected through audits, on-site reviews, and written confirmation from the subrecipient, highlighting the status of actions planned or taken to address Single Audit findings related to the particular subaward. • Issuing a management decision for applicable audit findings pertaining only to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity as required by 2 CFR 200.521. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.332(f) notes that a pass-through entity must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by the Uniform Guidance when it is expected that the subrecipient's Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in 2 CFR 200.501. Cause In compiling the consolidated analysis of all subrecipients with active funding during the fiscal year, the Post-Award team utilized reporting of subrecipient expenditures from the general ledger. This report inadvertently omitted a period of time during the fiscal year, which caused omission of select subrecipients from the consolidated Post-Award analysis. Effect The lack of an annual review of subrecipient Uniform Guidance reports may result in potential compliance issues not being identified and management not addressing findings and issuing a management decision, as required under the Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs There are no questioned costs associated with this finding. Through audit procedures, there was no evidence of non-compliance from subrecipients. Recommendation We recommend the University address the completeness of their consolidated subrecipient monitoring through review of the reports used to compile the analysis. Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan Management’s response is included in “Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan” included at the end of this report after the summary schedule of status of prior audit findings
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name: Assistance Listing Number 84.425, Department of Education, Education Stabilization Fund and Assistance Listing Number 84.010A, Department of Education, Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies Federal Award Identification Number and Year: 213716, 231530 and 241530 Pass-through Entity – Michigan Department of Education Finding Type – Material weakness over compliance Repeat Finding - No Criteria – Per 2 CFR 200.512 (a) (1), the audit must be completed, and the data collection form described in paragraph (b) of this section and reporting package described in paragraph (c) of this section must be submitted within the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor's report(s), or nine months after the end of the audit period. Per 2 CFR 200.501 (b), a non-Federal entity that expends $750,000 or more during the non-Federal entity's fiscal year in Federal awards must have a single audit conducted in accordance with § 200.514. Condition – The data collection form was not submitted within the required time as required by 2 CFR 200.512 for the year ended June 30, 2023. Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed – N/A Questioned Costs – None Cause – The Academy’s books and records for the 2023 fiscal year were not reconciled or closed in a timely manner. The data collection form was not submitted within the required time. Effect – Data collection form were not submitted on time. Recommendation – We recommend that the Academy develop a reliable system to close the financial records in a timely manner. View of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan – Management agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name: Assistance Listing Number 84.425, Department of Education, Education Stabilization Fund and Assistance Listing Number 84.010A, Department of Education, Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies Federal Award Identification Number and Year: 213716, 231530 and 241530 Pass-through Entity – Michigan Department of Education Finding Type – Material weakness over compliance Repeat Finding - No Criteria – Per 2 CFR 200.512 (a) (1), the audit must be completed, and the data collection form described in paragraph (b) of this section and reporting package described in paragraph (c) of this section must be submitted within the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor's report(s), or nine months after the end of the audit period. Per 2 CFR 200.501 (b), a non-Federal entity that expends $750,000 or more during the non-Federal entity's fiscal year in Federal awards must have a single audit conducted in accordance with § 200.514. Condition – The data collection form was not submitted within the required time as required by 2 CFR 200.512 for the year ended June 30, 2023. Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed – N/A Questioned Costs – None Cause – The Academy’s books and records for the 2023 fiscal year were not reconciled or closed in a timely manner. The data collection form was not submitted within the required time. Effect – Data collection form were not submitted on time. Recommendation – We recommend that the Academy develop a reliable system to close the financial records in a timely manner. View of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan – Management agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name: Assistance Listing Number 84.425, Department of Education, Education Stabilization Fund and Assistance Listing Number 84.010A, Department of Education, Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies Federal Award Identification Number and Year: 213716, 231530 and 241530 Pass-through Entity – Michigan Department of Education Finding Type – Material weakness over compliance Repeat Finding - No Criteria – Per 2 CFR 200.512 (a) (1), the audit must be completed, and the data collection form described in paragraph (b) of this section and reporting package described in paragraph (c) of this section must be submitted within the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor's report(s), or nine months after the end of the audit period. Per 2 CFR 200.501 (b), a non-Federal entity that expends $750,000 or more during the non-Federal entity's fiscal year in Federal awards must have a single audit conducted in accordance with § 200.514. Condition – The data collection form was not submitted within the required time as required by 2 CFR 200.512 for the year ended June 30, 2023. Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed – N/A Questioned Costs – None Cause – The Academy’s books and records for the 2023 fiscal year were not reconciled or closed in a timely manner. The data collection form was not submitted within the required time. Effect – Data collection form were not submitted on time. Recommendation – We recommend that the Academy develop a reliable system to close the financial records in a timely manner. View of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan – Management agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name: Assistance Listing Number 84.425, Department of Education, Education Stabilization Fund and Assistance Listing Number 84.010A, Department of Education, Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies Federal Award Identification Number and Year: 213716, 231530 and 241530 Pass-through Entity – Michigan Department of Education Finding Type – Material weakness over compliance Repeat Finding - No Criteria – Per 2 CFR 200.512 (a) (1), the audit must be completed, and the data collection form described in paragraph (b) of this section and reporting package described in paragraph (c) of this section must be submitted within the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor's report(s), or nine months after the end of the audit period. Per 2 CFR 200.501 (b), a non-Federal entity that expends $750,000 or more during the non-Federal entity's fiscal year in Federal awards must have a single audit conducted in accordance with § 200.514. Condition – The data collection form was not submitted within the required time as required by 2 CFR 200.512 for the year ended June 30, 2023. Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed – N/A Questioned Costs – None Cause – The Academy’s books and records for the 2023 fiscal year were not reconciled or closed in a timely manner. The data collection form was not submitted within the required time. Effect – Data collection form were not submitted on time. Recommendation – We recommend that the Academy develop a reliable system to close the financial records in a timely manner. View of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan – Management agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name: Assistance Listing Number 84.425, Department of Education, Education Stabilization Fund and Assistance Listing Number 84.010A, Department of Education, Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies Federal Award Identification Number and Year: 213716, 231530 and 241530 Pass-through Entity – Michigan Department of Education Finding Type – Material weakness over compliance Repeat Finding - No Criteria – Per 2 CFR 200.512 (a) (1), the audit must be completed, and the data collection form described in paragraph (b) of this section and reporting package described in paragraph (c) of this section must be submitted within the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor's report(s), or nine months after the end of the audit period. Per 2 CFR 200.501 (b), a non-Federal entity that expends $750,000 or more during the non-Federal entity's fiscal year in Federal awards must have a single audit conducted in accordance with § 200.514. Condition – The data collection form was not submitted within the required time as required by 2 CFR 200.512 for the year ended June 30, 2023. Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed – N/A Questioned Costs – None Cause – The Academy’s books and records for the 2023 fiscal year were not reconciled or closed in a timely manner. The data collection form was not submitted within the required time. Effect – Data collection form were not submitted on time. Recommendation – We recommend that the Academy develop a reliable system to close the financial records in a timely manner. View of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan – Management agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name: Assistance Listing Number 84.425, Department of Education, Education Stabilization Fund and Assistance Listing Number 84.010A, Department of Education, Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies Federal Award Identification Number and Year: 213716, 231530 and 241530 Pass-through Entity – Michigan Department of Education Finding Type – Material weakness over compliance Repeat Finding - No Criteria – Per 2 CFR 200.512 (a) (1), the audit must be completed, and the data collection form described in paragraph (b) of this section and reporting package described in paragraph (c) of this section must be submitted within the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor's report(s), or nine months after the end of the audit period. Per 2 CFR 200.501 (b), a non-Federal entity that expends $750,000 or more during the non-Federal entity's fiscal year in Federal awards must have a single audit conducted in accordance with § 200.514. Condition – The data collection form was not submitted within the required time as required by 2 CFR 200.512 for the year ended June 30, 2023. Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed – N/A Questioned Costs – None Cause – The Academy’s books and records for the 2023 fiscal year were not reconciled or closed in a timely manner. The data collection form was not submitted within the required time. Effect – Data collection form were not submitted on time. Recommendation – We recommend that the Academy develop a reliable system to close the financial records in a timely manner. View of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan – Management agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name: Assistance Listing Number 84.425, Department of Education, Education Stabilization Fund and Assistance Listing Number 84.010A, Department of Education, Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies Federal Award Identification Number and Year: 213716, 231530 and 241530 Pass-through Entity – Michigan Department of Education Finding Type – Material weakness over compliance Repeat Finding - No Criteria – Per 2 CFR 200.512 (a) (1), the audit must be completed, and the data collection form described in paragraph (b) of this section and reporting package described in paragraph (c) of this section must be submitted within the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor's report(s), or nine months after the end of the audit period. Per 2 CFR 200.501 (b), a non-Federal entity that expends $750,000 or more during the non-Federal entity's fiscal year in Federal awards must have a single audit conducted in accordance with § 200.514. Condition – The data collection form was not submitted within the required time as required by 2 CFR 200.512 for the year ended June 30, 2023. Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed – N/A Questioned Costs – None Cause – The Academy’s books and records for the 2023 fiscal year were not reconciled or closed in a timely manner. The data collection form was not submitted within the required time. Effect – Data collection form were not submitted on time. Recommendation – We recommend that the Academy develop a reliable system to close the financial records in a timely manner. View of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan – Management agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name: Assistance Listing Number 84.425, Department of Education, Education Stabilization Fund Federal Award Identification Number and Year: 213713 Pass-through Entity – Michigan Department of Education Finding Type – Material weakness over compliance Repeat Finding - No Criteria – Per 2 CFR 200.512 (a) (1), the audit must be completed, and the data collection form described in paragraph (b) of this section and reporting package described in paragraph (c) of this section must be submitted within the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor's report(s), or nine months after the end of the audit period. Per 2 CFR 200.501 (b), a non-Federal entity that expends $750,000 or more during the non-Federal entity's fiscal year in Federal awards must have a single audit conducted in accordance with § 200.514. Condition – The data collection form was not submitted within the required time as required by 2 CFR 200.512 for the year ended June 30, 2023. Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed – N/A Questioned Costs – None Cause – The Academy’s books and records for the 2023 fiscal year were not reconciled or closed in a timely manner. The data collection form was not submitted within the required time. Effect – Data collection form was not submitted on time. Recommendation – We recommend that the Academy develop a reliable system to close the financial records in a timely manner. View of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan – Management agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name: Assistance Listing Number 84.425, Department of Education, Education Stabilization Fund Federal Award Identification Number and Year: 213713 Pass-through Entity – Michigan Department of Education Finding Type – Material weakness over compliance Repeat Finding - No Criteria – Per 2 CFR 200.512 (a) (1), the audit must be completed, and the data collection form described in paragraph (b) of this section and reporting package described in paragraph (c) of this section must be submitted within the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor's report(s), or nine months after the end of the audit period. Per 2 CFR 200.501 (b), a non-Federal entity that expends $750,000 or more during the non-Federal entity's fiscal year in Federal awards must have a single audit conducted in accordance with § 200.514. Condition – The data collection form was not submitted within the required time as required by 2 CFR 200.512 for the year ended June 30, 2023. Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed – N/A Questioned Costs – None Cause – The Academy’s books and records for the 2023 fiscal year were not reconciled or closed in a timely manner. The data collection form was not submitted within the required time. Effect – Data collection form was not submitted on time. Recommendation – We recommend that the Academy develop a reliable system to close the financial records in a timely manner. View of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan – Management agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name: Assistance Listing Number 84.425, Department of Education, Education Stabilization Fund Federal Award Identification Number and Year: 213713 Pass-through Entity – Michigan Department of Education Finding Type – Material weakness over compliance Repeat Finding - No Criteria – Per 2 CFR 200.512 (a) (1), the audit must be completed, and the data collection form described in paragraph (b) of this section and reporting package described in paragraph (c) of this section must be submitted within the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor's report(s), or nine months after the end of the audit period. Per 2 CFR 200.501 (b), a non-Federal entity that expends $750,000 or more during the non-Federal entity's fiscal year in Federal awards must have a single audit conducted in accordance with § 200.514. Condition – The data collection form was not submitted within the required time as required by 2 CFR 200.512 for the year ended June 30, 2023. Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed – N/A Questioned Costs – None Cause – The Academy’s books and records for the 2023 fiscal year were not reconciled or closed in a timely manner. The data collection form was not submitted within the required time. Effect – Data collection form was not submitted on time. Recommendation – We recommend that the Academy develop a reliable system to close the financial records in a timely manner. View of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan – Management agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name: Assistance Listing Number 84.425, Department of Education, Education Stabilization Fund Federal Award Identification Number and Year: 213713 Pass-through Entity – Michigan Department of Education Finding Type – Material weakness over compliance Repeat Finding - No Criteria – Per 2 CFR 200.512 (a) (1), the audit must be completed, and the data collection form described in paragraph (b) of this section and reporting package described in paragraph (c) of this section must be submitted within the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor's report(s), or nine months after the end of the audit period. Per 2 CFR 200.501 (b), a non-Federal entity that expends $750,000 or more during the non-Federal entity's fiscal year in Federal awards must have a single audit conducted in accordance with § 200.514. Condition – The data collection form was not submitted within the required time as required by 2 CFR 200.512 for the year ended June 30, 2023. Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed – N/A Questioned Costs – None Cause – The Academy’s books and records for the 2023 fiscal year were not reconciled or closed in a timely manner. The data collection form was not submitted within the required time. Effect – Data collection form was not submitted on time. Recommendation – We recommend that the Academy develop a reliable system to close the financial records in a timely manner. View of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan – Management agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan.
Criteria: Per 2 CFR 200.501, all entities that spend $750,000 or more in federal grant funds in a fiscal year must submit an audit. The single audit report is required to be electronically submitted to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse the earlier of thirty days after receipt of the report or nine months after the fiscal year end. Statement of condition: The Institution’s single audit report package for the period ending June 30, 2023, was due the earlier of January 13, 2024, or March 30, 2024. Statement of cause: The single audit report package was electronically submitted to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse on May 1, 2024. Effect: The Institution is not qualified as a low-risk auditee because of the late submission. Effect: The Institution is not qualified as a low-risk auditee because of the late submission. Questioned costs: None Judgement of prevalence and consequence: Finding represents an isolated instance. Repeat finding: Not a repeat finding. Recommendation: Upon receipt of the single audit report, the Institution is advised to identify the date the report is required to be electronically submitted to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse and confirm the single audit report package was timely submitted to prevent future occurrences of this audit finding. View of responsible officials of the auditee: The Institution agrees with the fining and recommendation.
Criteria: Per 2 CFR 200.501, all entities that spend $750,000 or more in federal grant funds in a fiscal year must submit an audit. The single audit report is required to be electronically submitted to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse the earlier of thirty days after receipt of the report or nine months after the fiscal year end. Statement of condition: The Institution’s single audit report package for the period ending June 30, 2023, was due the earlier of January 13, 2024, or March 30, 2024. Statement of cause: The single audit report package was electronically submitted to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse on May 1, 2024. Effect: The Institution is not qualified as a low-risk auditee because of the late submission. Effect: The Institution is not qualified as a low-risk auditee because of the late submission. Questioned costs: None Judgement of prevalence and consequence: Finding represents an isolated instance. Repeat finding: Not a repeat finding. Recommendation: Upon receipt of the single audit report, the Institution is advised to identify the date the report is required to be electronically submitted to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse and confirm the single audit report package was timely submitted to prevent future occurrences of this audit finding. View of responsible officials of the auditee: The Institution agrees with the fining and recommendation.
Criteria: Per 2 CFR 200.501, all entities that spend $750,000 or more in federal grant funds in a fiscal year must submit an audit. The single audit report is required to be electronically submitted to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse the earlier of thirty days after receipt of the report or nine months after the fiscal year end. Statement of condition: The Institution’s single audit report package for the period ending June 30, 2023, was due the earlier of January 13, 2024, or March 30, 2024. Statement of cause: The single audit report package was electronically submitted to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse on May 1, 2024. Effect: The Institution is not qualified as a low-risk auditee because of the late submission. Effect: The Institution is not qualified as a low-risk auditee because of the late submission. Questioned costs: None Judgement of prevalence and consequence: Finding represents an isolated instance. Repeat finding: Not a repeat finding. Recommendation: Upon receipt of the single audit report, the Institution is advised to identify the date the report is required to be electronically submitted to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse and confirm the single audit report package was timely submitted to prevent future occurrences of this audit finding. View of responsible officials of the auditee: The Institution agrees with the fining and recommendation.
Federal program: All federal awards provided to subrecipients. FY/Federal Award ID#: FY2024/All federal awards provided to subrecipients. Federal agency: All federal awards provided to subrecipients. Pass thru entity: All federal awards provided to subrecipients. Criteria: per 24 CFR 574.500 -- Responsibility for grant administration: (a) General. Grantees are responsible for ensuring that grants are administered in accordance with the requirements of this part and other applicable laws. Grantees are responsible for ensuring that their respective subrecipients carry out activities in compliance with all applicable requirements. (b) Grant agreement. The grant agreement will provide that the grantee agrees, and will ensure that each subrecipient agrees, to: (1) Operate the program in accordance with the provisions of these regulations and other applicable HUD regulations; (2) Conduct an ongoing assessment of the housing assistance and supportive services required by the participants in the program; (3) Assure the adequate provision of supportive services to the participants in the program; and (4) Comply with such other terms and conditions, including recordkeeping and reports (which must include racial and ethnic data on participants) for program monitoring and evaluation purposes, as HUD may establish for purposes of carrying out the program in an effective and efficient manner. And 24 CFR 574.500 Applicability of Uniform Administrative Requirements as per 2 CFR 200.332(f) Requirements for pass-through entities. Verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of this part when it is expected that the Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in §200.501. Condition: The Foundation is not in compliance with recordkeeping for program monitoring and evaluation, as the Foundation did not comprehensively asses all subrecipients using riskbased/ subrecipient monitoring policies and procedures. Questioned Costs: None noted. Cause: Staff were not aware of the extent of the requirements to monitor program and fiscal compliance of project sponsors and document results and evidence of compliance or non-compliance. Therefore, a number of project sponsors/subrecipients were not monitored. Effect: Granting agencies cannot determine whether the Foundation is ensuring that the project sponsor is carrying out activities in compliance with all applicable requirements. Recommendation: The Foundation provide written policies and procedures for project sponsor monitoring and oversight, create a risk analysis form/process for all funded project sponsors and create a timeline to monitor project sponsors based on the risk analysis completed. Views of Responsible Officials: The Foundation has updated its Quality Management Plan to include comprehensive subrecipient monitoring policies. The Quality Management team is working with all programming to implement a robust monitoring process, including risk assessments, adherence to grantor regulations, service delivery, and program outcomes.
Federal program: All federal awards provided to subrecipients. FY/Federal Award ID#: FY2024/All federal awards provided to subrecipients. Federal agency: All federal awards provided to subrecipients. Pass thru entity: All federal awards provided to subrecipients. Criteria: per 24 CFR 574.500 -- Responsibility for grant administration: (a) General. Grantees are responsible for ensuring that grants are administered in accordance with the requirements of this part and other applicable laws. Grantees are responsible for ensuring that their respective subrecipients carry out activities in compliance with all applicable requirements. (b) Grant agreement. The grant agreement will provide that the grantee agrees, and will ensure that each subrecipient agrees, to: (1) Operate the program in accordance with the provisions of these regulations and other applicable HUD regulations; (2) Conduct an ongoing assessment of the housing assistance and supportive services required by the participants in the program; (3) Assure the adequate provision of supportive services to the participants in the program; and (4) Comply with such other terms and conditions, including recordkeeping and reports (which must include racial and ethnic data on participants) for program monitoring and evaluation purposes, as HUD may establish for purposes of carrying out the program in an effective and efficient manner. And 24 CFR 574.500 Applicability of Uniform Administrative Requirements as per 2 CFR 200.332(f) Requirements for pass-through entities. Verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of this part when it is expected that the Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in §200.501. Condition: The Foundation is not in compliance with recordkeeping for program monitoring and evaluation, as the Foundation did not comprehensively asses all subrecipients using riskbased/ subrecipient monitoring policies and procedures. Questioned Costs: None noted. Cause: Staff were not aware of the extent of the requirements to monitor program and fiscal compliance of project sponsors and document results and evidence of compliance or non-compliance. Therefore, a number of project sponsors/subrecipients were not monitored. Effect: Granting agencies cannot determine whether the Foundation is ensuring that the project sponsor is carrying out activities in compliance with all applicable requirements. Recommendation: The Foundation provide written policies and procedures for project sponsor monitoring and oversight, create a risk analysis form/process for all funded project sponsors and create a timeline to monitor project sponsors based on the risk analysis completed. Views of Responsible Officials: The Foundation has updated its Quality Management Plan to include comprehensive subrecipient monitoring policies. The Quality Management team is working with all programming to implement a robust monitoring process, including risk assessments, adherence to grantor regulations, service delivery, and program outcomes.
Federal program: All federal awards provided to subrecipients. FY/Federal Award ID#: FY2024/All federal awards provided to subrecipients. Federal agency: All federal awards provided to subrecipients. Pass thru entity: All federal awards provided to subrecipients. Criteria: per 24 CFR 574.500 -- Responsibility for grant administration: (a) General. Grantees are responsible for ensuring that grants are administered in accordance with the requirements of this part and other applicable laws. Grantees are responsible for ensuring that their respective subrecipients carry out activities in compliance with all applicable requirements. (b) Grant agreement. The grant agreement will provide that the grantee agrees, and will ensure that each subrecipient agrees, to: (1) Operate the program in accordance with the provisions of these regulations and other applicable HUD regulations; (2) Conduct an ongoing assessment of the housing assistance and supportive services required by the participants in the program; (3) Assure the adequate provision of supportive services to the participants in the program; and (4) Comply with such other terms and conditions, including recordkeeping and reports (which must include racial and ethnic data on participants) for program monitoring and evaluation purposes, as HUD may establish for purposes of carrying out the program in an effective and efficient manner. And 24 CFR 574.500 Applicability of Uniform Administrative Requirements as per 2 CFR 200.332(f) Requirements for pass-through entities. Verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of this part when it is expected that the Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in §200.501. Condition: The Foundation is not in compliance with recordkeeping for program monitoring and evaluation, as the Foundation did not comprehensively asses all subrecipients using riskbased/ subrecipient monitoring policies and procedures. Questioned Costs: None noted. Cause: Staff were not aware of the extent of the requirements to monitor program and fiscal compliance of project sponsors and document results and evidence of compliance or non-compliance. Therefore, a number of project sponsors/subrecipients were not monitored. Effect: Granting agencies cannot determine whether the Foundation is ensuring that the project sponsor is carrying out activities in compliance with all applicable requirements. Recommendation: The Foundation provide written policies and procedures for project sponsor monitoring and oversight, create a risk analysis form/process for all funded project sponsors and create a timeline to monitor project sponsors based on the risk analysis completed. Views of Responsible Officials: The Foundation has updated its Quality Management Plan to include comprehensive subrecipient monitoring policies. The Quality Management team is working with all programming to implement a robust monitoring process, including risk assessments, adherence to grantor regulations, service delivery, and program outcomes.
Federal program: All federal awards provided to subrecipients. FY/Federal Award ID#: FY2024/All federal awards provided to subrecipients. Federal agency: All federal awards provided to subrecipients. Pass thru entity: All federal awards provided to subrecipients. Criteria: per 24 CFR 574.500 -- Responsibility for grant administration: (a) General. Grantees are responsible for ensuring that grants are administered in accordance with the requirements of this part and other applicable laws. Grantees are responsible for ensuring that their respective subrecipients carry out activities in compliance with all applicable requirements. (b) Grant agreement. The grant agreement will provide that the grantee agrees, and will ensure that each subrecipient agrees, to: (1) Operate the program in accordance with the provisions of these regulations and other applicable HUD regulations; (2) Conduct an ongoing assessment of the housing assistance and supportive services required by the participants in the program; (3) Assure the adequate provision of supportive services to the participants in the program; and (4) Comply with such other terms and conditions, including recordkeeping and reports (which must include racial and ethnic data on participants) for program monitoring and evaluation purposes, as HUD may establish for purposes of carrying out the program in an effective and efficient manner. And 24 CFR 574.500 Applicability of Uniform Administrative Requirements as per 2 CFR 200.332(f) Requirements for pass-through entities. Verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of this part when it is expected that the Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in §200.501. Condition: The Foundation is not in compliance with recordkeeping for program monitoring and evaluation, as the Foundation did not comprehensively asses all subrecipients using riskbased/ subrecipient monitoring policies and procedures. Questioned Costs: None noted. Cause: Staff were not aware of the extent of the requirements to monitor program and fiscal compliance of project sponsors and document results and evidence of compliance or non-compliance. Therefore, a number of project sponsors/subrecipients were not monitored. Effect: Granting agencies cannot determine whether the Foundation is ensuring that the project sponsor is carrying out activities in compliance with all applicable requirements. Recommendation: The Foundation provide written policies and procedures for project sponsor monitoring and oversight, create a risk analysis form/process for all funded project sponsors and create a timeline to monitor project sponsors based on the risk analysis completed. Views of Responsible Officials: The Foundation has updated its Quality Management Plan to include comprehensive subrecipient monitoring policies. The Quality Management team is working with all programming to implement a robust monitoring process, including risk assessments, adherence to grantor regulations, service delivery, and program outcomes.
Federal program: All federal awards provided to subrecipients. FY/Federal Award ID#: FY2024/All federal awards provided to subrecipients. Federal agency: All federal awards provided to subrecipients. Pass thru entity: All federal awards provided to subrecipients. Criteria: per 24 CFR 574.500 -- Responsibility for grant administration: (a) General. Grantees are responsible for ensuring that grants are administered in accordance with the requirements of this part and other applicable laws. Grantees are responsible for ensuring that their respective subrecipients carry out activities in compliance with all applicable requirements. (b) Grant agreement. The grant agreement will provide that the grantee agrees, and will ensure that each subrecipient agrees, to: (1) Operate the program in accordance with the provisions of these regulations and other applicable HUD regulations; (2) Conduct an ongoing assessment of the housing assistance and supportive services required by the participants in the program; (3) Assure the adequate provision of supportive services to the participants in the program; and (4) Comply with such other terms and conditions, including recordkeeping and reports (which must include racial and ethnic data on participants) for program monitoring and evaluation purposes, as HUD may establish for purposes of carrying out the program in an effective and efficient manner. And 24 CFR 574.500 Applicability of Uniform Administrative Requirements as per 2 CFR 200.332(f) Requirements for pass-through entities. Verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of this part when it is expected that the Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in §200.501. Condition: The Foundation is not in compliance with recordkeeping for program monitoring and evaluation, as the Foundation did not comprehensively asses all subrecipients using riskbased/ subrecipient monitoring policies and procedures. Questioned Costs: None noted. Cause: Staff were not aware of the extent of the requirements to monitor program and fiscal compliance of project sponsors and document results and evidence of compliance or non-compliance. Therefore, a number of project sponsors/subrecipients were not monitored. Effect: Granting agencies cannot determine whether the Foundation is ensuring that the project sponsor is carrying out activities in compliance with all applicable requirements. Recommendation: The Foundation provide written policies and procedures for project sponsor monitoring and oversight, create a risk analysis form/process for all funded project sponsors and create a timeline to monitor project sponsors based on the risk analysis completed. Views of Responsible Officials: The Foundation has updated its Quality Management Plan to include comprehensive subrecipient monitoring policies. The Quality Management team is working with all programming to implement a robust monitoring process, including risk assessments, adherence to grantor regulations, service delivery, and program outcomes.
Federal program: All federal awards provided to subrecipients. FY/Federal Award ID#: FY2024/All federal awards provided to subrecipients. Federal agency: All federal awards provided to subrecipients. Pass thru entity: All federal awards provided to subrecipients. Criteria: per 24 CFR 574.500 -- Responsibility for grant administration: (a) General. Grantees are responsible for ensuring that grants are administered in accordance with the requirements of this part and other applicable laws. Grantees are responsible for ensuring that their respective subrecipients carry out activities in compliance with all applicable requirements. (b) Grant agreement. The grant agreement will provide that the grantee agrees, and will ensure that each subrecipient agrees, to: (1) Operate the program in accordance with the provisions of these regulations and other applicable HUD regulations; (2) Conduct an ongoing assessment of the housing assistance and supportive services required by the participants in the program; (3) Assure the adequate provision of supportive services to the participants in the program; and (4) Comply with such other terms and conditions, including recordkeeping and reports (which must include racial and ethnic data on participants) for program monitoring and evaluation purposes, as HUD may establish for purposes of carrying out the program in an effective and efficient manner. And 24 CFR 574.500 Applicability of Uniform Administrative Requirements as per 2 CFR 200.332(f) Requirements for pass-through entities. Verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of this part when it is expected that the Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in §200.501. Condition: The Foundation is not in compliance with recordkeeping for program monitoring and evaluation, as the Foundation did not comprehensively asses all subrecipients using riskbased/ subrecipient monitoring policies and procedures. Questioned Costs: None noted. Cause: Staff were not aware of the extent of the requirements to monitor program and fiscal compliance of project sponsors and document results and evidence of compliance or non-compliance. Therefore, a number of project sponsors/subrecipients were not monitored. Effect: Granting agencies cannot determine whether the Foundation is ensuring that the project sponsor is carrying out activities in compliance with all applicable requirements. Recommendation: The Foundation provide written policies and procedures for project sponsor monitoring and oversight, create a risk analysis form/process for all funded project sponsors and create a timeline to monitor project sponsors based on the risk analysis completed. Views of Responsible Officials: The Foundation has updated its Quality Management Plan to include comprehensive subrecipient monitoring policies. The Quality Management team is working with all programming to implement a robust monitoring process, including risk assessments, adherence to grantor regulations, service delivery, and program outcomes.
Federal program: All federal awards provided to subrecipients. FY/Federal Award ID#: FY2024/All federal awards provided to subrecipients. Federal agency: All federal awards provided to subrecipients. Pass thru entity: All federal awards provided to subrecipients. Criteria: per 24 CFR 574.500 -- Responsibility for grant administration: (a) General. Grantees are responsible for ensuring that grants are administered in accordance with the requirements of this part and other applicable laws. Grantees are responsible for ensuring that their respective subrecipients carry out activities in compliance with all applicable requirements. (b) Grant agreement. The grant agreement will provide that the grantee agrees, and will ensure that each subrecipient agrees, to: (1) Operate the program in accordance with the provisions of these regulations and other applicable HUD regulations; (2) Conduct an ongoing assessment of the housing assistance and supportive services required by the participants in the program; (3) Assure the adequate provision of supportive services to the participants in the program; and (4) Comply with such other terms and conditions, including recordkeeping and reports (which must include racial and ethnic data on participants) for program monitoring and evaluation purposes, as HUD may establish for purposes of carrying out the program in an effective and efficient manner. And 24 CFR 574.500 Applicability of Uniform Administrative Requirements as per 2 CFR 200.332(f) Requirements for pass-through entities. Verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of this part when it is expected that the Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in §200.501. Condition: The Foundation is not in compliance with recordkeeping for program monitoring and evaluation, as the Foundation did not comprehensively asses all subrecipients using riskbased/ subrecipient monitoring policies and procedures. Questioned Costs: None noted. Cause: Staff were not aware of the extent of the requirements to monitor program and fiscal compliance of project sponsors and document results and evidence of compliance or non-compliance. Therefore, a number of project sponsors/subrecipients were not monitored. Effect: Granting agencies cannot determine whether the Foundation is ensuring that the project sponsor is carrying out activities in compliance with all applicable requirements. Recommendation: The Foundation provide written policies and procedures for project sponsor monitoring and oversight, create a risk analysis form/process for all funded project sponsors and create a timeline to monitor project sponsors based on the risk analysis completed. Views of Responsible Officials: The Foundation has updated its Quality Management Plan to include comprehensive subrecipient monitoring policies. The Quality Management team is working with all programming to implement a robust monitoring process, including risk assessments, adherence to grantor regulations, service delivery, and program outcomes.
Federal program: All federal awards provided to subrecipients. FY/Federal Award ID#: FY2024/All federal awards provided to subrecipients. Federal agency: All federal awards provided to subrecipients. Pass thru entity: All federal awards provided to subrecipients. Criteria: per 24 CFR 574.500 -- Responsibility for grant administration: (a) General. Grantees are responsible for ensuring that grants are administered in accordance with the requirements of this part and other applicable laws. Grantees are responsible for ensuring that their respective subrecipients carry out activities in compliance with all applicable requirements. (b) Grant agreement. The grant agreement will provide that the grantee agrees, and will ensure that each subrecipient agrees, to: (1) Operate the program in accordance with the provisions of these regulations and other applicable HUD regulations; (2) Conduct an ongoing assessment of the housing assistance and supportive services required by the participants in the program; (3) Assure the adequate provision of supportive services to the participants in the program; and (4) Comply with such other terms and conditions, including recordkeeping and reports (which must include racial and ethnic data on participants) for program monitoring and evaluation purposes, as HUD may establish for purposes of carrying out the program in an effective and efficient manner. And 24 CFR 574.500 Applicability of Uniform Administrative Requirements as per 2 CFR 200.332(f) Requirements for pass-through entities. Verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of this part when it is expected that the Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in §200.501. Condition: The Foundation is not in compliance with recordkeeping for program monitoring and evaluation, as the Foundation did not comprehensively asses all subrecipients using riskbased/ subrecipient monitoring policies and procedures. Questioned Costs: None noted. Cause: Staff were not aware of the extent of the requirements to monitor program and fiscal compliance of project sponsors and document results and evidence of compliance or non-compliance. Therefore, a number of project sponsors/subrecipients were not monitored. Effect: Granting agencies cannot determine whether the Foundation is ensuring that the project sponsor is carrying out activities in compliance with all applicable requirements. Recommendation: The Foundation provide written policies and procedures for project sponsor monitoring and oversight, create a risk analysis form/process for all funded project sponsors and create a timeline to monitor project sponsors based on the risk analysis completed. Views of Responsible Officials: The Foundation has updated its Quality Management Plan to include comprehensive subrecipient monitoring policies. The Quality Management team is working with all programming to implement a robust monitoring process, including risk assessments, adherence to grantor regulations, service delivery, and program outcomes.
Federal program: All federal awards provided to subrecipients. FY/Federal Award ID#: FY2024/All federal awards provided to subrecipients. Federal agency: All federal awards provided to subrecipients. Pass thru entity: All federal awards provided to subrecipients. Criteria: per 24 CFR 574.500 -- Responsibility for grant administration: (a) General. Grantees are responsible for ensuring that grants are administered in accordance with the requirements of this part and other applicable laws. Grantees are responsible for ensuring that their respective subrecipients carry out activities in compliance with all applicable requirements. (b) Grant agreement. The grant agreement will provide that the grantee agrees, and will ensure that each subrecipient agrees, to: (1) Operate the program in accordance with the provisions of these regulations and other applicable HUD regulations; (2) Conduct an ongoing assessment of the housing assistance and supportive services required by the participants in the program; (3) Assure the adequate provision of supportive services to the participants in the program; and (4) Comply with such other terms and conditions, including recordkeeping and reports (which must include racial and ethnic data on participants) for program monitoring and evaluation purposes, as HUD may establish for purposes of carrying out the program in an effective and efficient manner. And 24 CFR 574.500 Applicability of Uniform Administrative Requirements as per 2 CFR 200.332(f) Requirements for pass-through entities. Verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of this part when it is expected that the Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in §200.501. Condition: The Foundation is not in compliance with recordkeeping for program monitoring and evaluation, as the Foundation did not comprehensively asses all subrecipients using riskbased/ subrecipient monitoring policies and procedures. Questioned Costs: None noted. Cause: Staff were not aware of the extent of the requirements to monitor program and fiscal compliance of project sponsors and document results and evidence of compliance or non-compliance. Therefore, a number of project sponsors/subrecipients were not monitored. Effect: Granting agencies cannot determine whether the Foundation is ensuring that the project sponsor is carrying out activities in compliance with all applicable requirements. Recommendation: The Foundation provide written policies and procedures for project sponsor monitoring and oversight, create a risk analysis form/process for all funded project sponsors and create a timeline to monitor project sponsors based on the risk analysis completed. Views of Responsible Officials: The Foundation has updated its Quality Management Plan to include comprehensive subrecipient monitoring policies. The Quality Management team is working with all programming to implement a robust monitoring process, including risk assessments, adherence to grantor regulations, service delivery, and program outcomes.
Federal program: All federal awards provided to subrecipients. FY/Federal Award ID#: FY2024/All federal awards provided to subrecipients. Federal agency: All federal awards provided to subrecipients. Pass thru entity: All federal awards provided to subrecipients. Criteria: per 24 CFR 574.500 -- Responsibility for grant administration: (a) General. Grantees are responsible for ensuring that grants are administered in accordance with the requirements of this part and other applicable laws. Grantees are responsible for ensuring that their respective subrecipients carry out activities in compliance with all applicable requirements. (b) Grant agreement. The grant agreement will provide that the grantee agrees, and will ensure that each subrecipient agrees, to: (1) Operate the program in accordance with the provisions of these regulations and other applicable HUD regulations; (2) Conduct an ongoing assessment of the housing assistance and supportive services required by the participants in the program; (3) Assure the adequate provision of supportive services to the participants in the program; and (4) Comply with such other terms and conditions, including recordkeeping and reports (which must include racial and ethnic data on participants) for program monitoring and evaluation purposes, as HUD may establish for purposes of carrying out the program in an effective and efficient manner. And 24 CFR 574.500 Applicability of Uniform Administrative Requirements as per 2 CFR 200.332(f) Requirements for pass-through entities. Verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of this part when it is expected that the Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in §200.501. Condition: The Foundation is not in compliance with recordkeeping for program monitoring and evaluation, as the Foundation did not comprehensively asses all subrecipients using riskbased/ subrecipient monitoring policies and procedures. Questioned Costs: None noted. Cause: Staff were not aware of the extent of the requirements to monitor program and fiscal compliance of project sponsors and document results and evidence of compliance or non-compliance. Therefore, a number of project sponsors/subrecipients were not monitored. Effect: Granting agencies cannot determine whether the Foundation is ensuring that the project sponsor is carrying out activities in compliance with all applicable requirements. Recommendation: The Foundation provide written policies and procedures for project sponsor monitoring and oversight, create a risk analysis form/process for all funded project sponsors and create a timeline to monitor project sponsors based on the risk analysis completed. Views of Responsible Officials: The Foundation has updated its Quality Management Plan to include comprehensive subrecipient monitoring policies. The Quality Management team is working with all programming to implement a robust monitoring process, including risk assessments, adherence to grantor regulations, service delivery, and program outcomes.
Federal program: All federal awards provided to subrecipients. FY/Federal Award ID#: FY2024/All federal awards provided to subrecipients. Federal agency: All federal awards provided to subrecipients. Pass thru entity: All federal awards provided to subrecipients. Criteria: per 24 CFR 574.500 -- Responsibility for grant administration: (a) General. Grantees are responsible for ensuring that grants are administered in accordance with the requirements of this part and other applicable laws. Grantees are responsible for ensuring that their respective subrecipients carry out activities in compliance with all applicable requirements. (b) Grant agreement. The grant agreement will provide that the grantee agrees, and will ensure that each subrecipient agrees, to: (1) Operate the program in accordance with the provisions of these regulations and other applicable HUD regulations; (2) Conduct an ongoing assessment of the housing assistance and supportive services required by the participants in the program; (3) Assure the adequate provision of supportive services to the participants in the program; and (4) Comply with such other terms and conditions, including recordkeeping and reports (which must include racial and ethnic data on participants) for program monitoring and evaluation purposes, as HUD may establish for purposes of carrying out the program in an effective and efficient manner. And 24 CFR 574.500 Applicability of Uniform Administrative Requirements as per 2 CFR 200.332(f) Requirements for pass-through entities. Verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of this part when it is expected that the Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in §200.501. Condition: The Foundation is not in compliance with recordkeeping for program monitoring and evaluation, as the Foundation did not comprehensively asses all subrecipients using riskbased/ subrecipient monitoring policies and procedures. Questioned Costs: None noted. Cause: Staff were not aware of the extent of the requirements to monitor program and fiscal compliance of project sponsors and document results and evidence of compliance or non-compliance. Therefore, a number of project sponsors/subrecipients were not monitored. Effect: Granting agencies cannot determine whether the Foundation is ensuring that the project sponsor is carrying out activities in compliance with all applicable requirements. Recommendation: The Foundation provide written policies and procedures for project sponsor monitoring and oversight, create a risk analysis form/process for all funded project sponsors and create a timeline to monitor project sponsors based on the risk analysis completed. Views of Responsible Officials: The Foundation has updated its Quality Management Plan to include comprehensive subrecipient monitoring policies. The Quality Management team is working with all programming to implement a robust monitoring process, including risk assessments, adherence to grantor regulations, service delivery, and program outcomes.
Federal program: All federal awards provided to subrecipients. FY/Federal Award ID#: FY2024/All federal awards provided to subrecipients. Federal agency: All federal awards provided to subrecipients. Pass thru entity: All federal awards provided to subrecipients. Criteria: per 24 CFR 574.500 -- Responsibility for grant administration: (a) General. Grantees are responsible for ensuring that grants are administered in accordance with the requirements of this part and other applicable laws. Grantees are responsible for ensuring that their respective subrecipients carry out activities in compliance with all applicable requirements. (b) Grant agreement. The grant agreement will provide that the grantee agrees, and will ensure that each subrecipient agrees, to: (1) Operate the program in accordance with the provisions of these regulations and other applicable HUD regulations; (2) Conduct an ongoing assessment of the housing assistance and supportive services required by the participants in the program; (3) Assure the adequate provision of supportive services to the participants in the program; and (4) Comply with such other terms and conditions, including recordkeeping and reports (which must include racial and ethnic data on participants) for program monitoring and evaluation purposes, as HUD may establish for purposes of carrying out the program in an effective and efficient manner. And 24 CFR 574.500 Applicability of Uniform Administrative Requirements as per 2 CFR 200.332(f) Requirements for pass-through entities. Verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of this part when it is expected that the Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in §200.501. Condition: The Foundation is not in compliance with recordkeeping for program monitoring and evaluation, as the Foundation did not comprehensively asses all subrecipients using riskbased/ subrecipient monitoring policies and procedures. Questioned Costs: None noted. Cause: Staff were not aware of the extent of the requirements to monitor program and fiscal compliance of project sponsors and document results and evidence of compliance or non-compliance. Therefore, a number of project sponsors/subrecipients were not monitored. Effect: Granting agencies cannot determine whether the Foundation is ensuring that the project sponsor is carrying out activities in compliance with all applicable requirements. Recommendation: The Foundation provide written policies and procedures for project sponsor monitoring and oversight, create a risk analysis form/process for all funded project sponsors and create a timeline to monitor project sponsors based on the risk analysis completed. Views of Responsible Officials: The Foundation has updated its Quality Management Plan to include comprehensive subrecipient monitoring policies. The Quality Management team is working with all programming to implement a robust monitoring process, including risk assessments, adherence to grantor regulations, service delivery, and program outcomes.
Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart F requires the pass-through entity to verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F - Audit Requirements of this part when it is expected that the subrecipient's Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in § 200.501 Audit requirements. Per 2 CFR 200.303, non-federal entities receiving federal awards must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should comply with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition: Kansas Division of Emergency Management (Management) did not track, determine or monitor the audit verification requirement for its subrecipients in a timely manner. Questioned costs: None Context: For 18 of 22 subrecipients selected for testing (82%), Management did not timely verify subrecipients were audited in accordance with Subpart F. Management did not send the annual audit letter to the subrecipients on a timely basis or provide an adequate documentation for the audit verification to verify this was conducted during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024. Cause: Procedures and controls were not sufficient to ensure that it verified that subrecipients were audited in accordance with Subpart F timely. Effect: Without being able to verify through supporting documentation that subrecipients have obtained audits as required by Subpart F and management met the requirements in 2 CFR Part 200 Subpart F and 2 CFR 200.303,, there is an increased risk that subrecipients could be inappropriately spending and/or inaccurately tracking and reporting federal funds over multiple year periods, and these discrepancies may not be properly monitored, detected, and corrected by Management on a timely basis. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend that the agency review its procedures for monitoring of annual audits for subrecipients to ensure that subrecipients are audited in accordance with Subpart F timely and that supporting documentation is maintained to evidence this was done timely. We recommend that a clear timeline and tracking for this monitoring be added to the policies and procedures. Views of responsible officials: Management does not agree with this finding. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: • KDEM manages the grant expenditures during the entire lifespan of the project. Scope of work is matched with actual expenses and validated before sending to FEMA for close-out. • KDEM’s audit tracker identifies when audit letters were sent and can be verified through email verification sent to sub-recipients. • There is no regulation stipulating what is “timely”. KDEM verifies audits annually. Auditor’s Concluding Remarks: Management’s response did not persuade the auditor to revise the finding. Sufficient supporting evidence to demonstrate when the audit letters were sent and returned was not provided during the single audit testing process. We also did not see a detailed timeline and tracking process documented in policies and procedures to support evidence of compliance with these requirements.
Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart F requires the pass-through entity to verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F - Audit Requirements of this part when it is expected that the subrecipient's Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in § 200.501 Audit requirements. Per 2 CFR 200.303, non-federal entities receiving federal awards must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should comply with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition: Kansas Division of Emergency Management (Management) did not track, determine or monitor the audit verification requirement for its subrecipients in a timely manner. Questioned costs: None Context: For 18 of 22 subrecipients selected for testing (82%), Management did not timely verify subrecipients were audited in accordance with Subpart F. Management did not send the annual audit letter to the subrecipients on a timely basis or provide an adequate documentation for the audit verification to verify this was conducted during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024. Cause: Procedures and controls were not sufficient to ensure that it verified that subrecipients were audited in accordance with Subpart F timely. Effect: Without being able to verify through supporting documentation that subrecipients have obtained audits as required by Subpart F and management met the requirements in 2 CFR Part 200 Subpart F and 2 CFR 200.303,, there is an increased risk that subrecipients could be inappropriately spending and/or inaccurately tracking and reporting federal funds over multiple year periods, and these discrepancies may not be properly monitored, detected, and corrected by Management on a timely basis. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend that the agency review its procedures for monitoring of annual audits for subrecipients to ensure that subrecipients are audited in accordance with Subpart F timely and that supporting documentation is maintained to evidence this was done timely. We recommend that a clear timeline and tracking for this monitoring be added to the policies and procedures. Views of responsible officials: Management does not agree with this finding. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: • KDEM manages the grant expenditures during the entire lifespan of the project. Scope of work is matched with actual expenses and validated before sending to FEMA for close-out. • KDEM’s audit tracker identifies when audit letters were sent and can be verified through email verification sent to sub-recipients. • There is no regulation stipulating what is “timely”. KDEM verifies audits annually. Auditor’s Concluding Remarks: Management’s response did not persuade the auditor to revise the finding. Sufficient supporting evidence to demonstrate when the audit letters were sent and returned was not provided during the single audit testing process. We also did not see a detailed timeline and tracking process documented in policies and procedures to support evidence of compliance with these requirements.
Various Agencies Finding 2024 ¬– 015: ALN 10.565, 10.568, 10.569 – Food Distribution Cluster ALN 15.252 – Abandoned Mine Land Reclamation (AMLR) ALN 21.027 – COVID 19 – Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds ALN 84.425C – COVID 19 – Education Stabilization Fund – GEER Fund ALN 84.425D – COVID 19 – Education Stabilization Fund – ESSER Fund ALN 84.425R – COVID 19 – Education Stabilization Fund – CRRSA EANS Program ALN 84.425U – COVID 19 – Education Stabilization Fund – ARP ESSER ALN 84.425V – COVID 19 – Education Stabilization Fund – ARP EANS Program ALN 84.425W – COVID 19 – Education Stabilization Fund – ARP ESSER HCY ALN 93.044, 93.045, 93.053 – Aging Cluster (including COVID-19) ALN 93.558 – Temporary Assistance for Needy Families ALN 93.667 – Social Services Block Grant A Material Weakness and Material Noncompliance Exist in the Commonwealth’s Subrecipient Audit Resolution Process (A Similar Condition Was Noted in Prior Year Finding 2023-024) Federal Grant Number(s) and Year(s): 228PA100I1003 (6/13/2022 – 6/30/2025), 231PA445Q2204 (10/01/2022 – 9/30/2023), 231PA825Y8005 (10/01/2022 – 9/30/2023), 231PA825Y8105 (10/01/2022 – 9/30/2023), 241PA825Y8005 (10/01/2023 – 9/30/2024), 241PA825Y8105 (10/01/2023 – 9/30/2024), S18AF20004 (11/01/2017 – 10/31/2025), S19AF20004 (12/01/2018 – 11/30/2025), S21AF10015 (1/01/2021 – 12/31/2023), S22AF00017 (1/01/2022 – 12/31/2024), S23AF00002 (11/01/2022 – 10/31/2027), TN75GJE1S7G3 (3/03/2021 – 12/31/2024), S425W210039 (4/23/2021 – 9/30/2024), S425U210028 (3/24/2021– 9/30/2024), S425D210028 (1/05/2021 – 9/30/2024), S425C200013 (5/18/2020 – 4/01/2024), S425R210037 (3/13/2020 – 9/30/2024), S425V210037 (11/16/2021 – 9/30/2024), S425C210013 (3/13/2020 – 9/30/2024), 2101PACMC6 (4/01/2021 – 9/30/2024), 2101PAHDC6 (4/01/2021 – 9/30/2024), 2101PAPHC6 (4/01/2021 – 9/30/2024), 2101PASSC6 (4/01/2021 – 9/30/2024), 2201PAOASS (10/01/2021 – 9/30/2023), 2201PASTPH (1/01/2022 – 9/30/2024), 2301PAOACM (10/01/2022 – 9/30/2024), 2301PAOAHD (10/01/2022 – 9/30/2024), 2301PAOANS (10/01/2022 – 9/30/2024), 2301PAOASS (10/01/2022 – 9/30/2024), 2401PAOACM (10/01/2023 – 9/30/2025), 2401PAOAHD (10/01/2023 – 9/30/2025), 2401PAOANS (10/01/2023 – 9/30/2025), 2401PAOASS (10/01/2023 – 9/30/2025), 2101PATANF (10/01/2020 – 9/30/2021), 2201PATANF (10/01/2021 – 9/30/2022), 2301PATANF (10/01/2022 – 9/30/2023), 2401PATANF (10/01/2023 – 9/30/2024), 2301PASOSR (10/01/2022 – 9/30/2024), 2401PASOSR (10/01/2023 – 9/30/2025), 2301PATANF (10/01/2022 – 9/30/2024), 2401PATANF (10/01/2023 – 9/30/2025) Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance, Other Matters for Abandoned Mine Land Reclamation (AMLR), Temporary Assistance for Needy Families, Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, and Social Services Block Grant Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance, Material Noncompliance for Food Distribution Cluster, Education Stabilization Fund, and Aging Cluster Compliance Requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Condition: Under the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania's (Commonwealth) implementation of the Single Audit Act, review and resolution of subrecipient Single Audit reports is split into two stages. The Office of the Budget’s Bureau of Accounting and Financial Management (OB-BAFM) ensures the reports meet technical standards through a centralized desk review process. The various funding agencies in the Commonwealth are responsible for making a management decision on each finding within six months of the Federal Audit Clearinghouse’s (FAC) Acceptance date for audits subject to Uniform Guidance and to ensure appropriate corrective action is taken by the subrecipient (except for Uniform Guidance Finding 2024 ¬– 015: (continued) audits under U.S. Department of Labor programs which are permitted 12 months for management decisions in accordance with 2 CFR Section 2900.21). Each Commonwealth agency is also responsible for reviewing financial information in each audit report to determine whether the audit included all pass-through funding provided by the agency to ensure pass-through funds were subject to audit. Most agencies meet this requirement by performing Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) reconciliations. The agency is also required to adjust Commonwealth records, if necessary. Our fiscal year ended June 30, 2024 audit of the Commonwealth’s process for review and resolution of subrecipient Single Audits included an evaluation of the Commonwealth’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 subrecipient audit universe for audits due for submission to the FAC during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024. We also evaluated the Commonwealth’s review of 45 subrecipient audit reports with findings in major programs/clusters which were identified on the Commonwealth agencies’ tracking lists during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024 and required management decisions by Commonwealth agencies. Our testing disclosed the following audit exceptions regarding the Commonwealth agencies’ review of subrecipient audit reports: • Pennsylvania Department of Aging (PDOA): Our testing disclosed that PDOA did not have procedures in place to track audit reports including having an audit tracking list. The time period for making a management decision on findings was approximately 17.6 months to over 18 months after the FAC Acceptance date for two out of two audit reports with findings. There was also a delay in PDOA’s procedures to ensure the subrecipient SEFAs were accurate so that major programs were properly determined and subjected to audit. • Department of Agriculture (PDA): Our testing disclosed that PDA did not have procedures in place to track audit reports including having an audit tracking list. The time period for making a management decision on findings was approximately 8.7 months to over 16 months after the FAC Acceptance date for four out of four audit reports with findings. • Department of Education (PDE): The time period for making a management decision on findings was approximately 7.8 months to over 12 months after the FAC Acceptance date for seven out of 22 audit reports with findings. There were additional audit reports with findings listed on PDE’s audit tracking list where management decisions were not made timely. • Department of Environmental Protection (DEP): The time period for making a management decision on findings was approximately 11.6 months to over 12 months after the FAC Acceptance date for two out of two audit reports with findings. Our testing disclosed for the two late audit reports, DEP made management decisions timely. However, DEP did not notify the subrecipients of the management decisions within the required six month time period after the audit reports FAC Acceptance date. • Department of Human Services (DHS): The time period for making a management decision on findings was approximately 7.2 months after the FAC Acceptance date for one out of two audit reports with findings. Our testing disclosed for the one late audit report DHS made a management decision timely. However, DHS did not notify the subrecipient of the management decision within the required six month time period after the audit reports FAC Acceptance date. Criteria: 2 CFR §200.332, Requirements for pass-through entities, states in part: All pass-through entities must: (d) Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward, and that subaward performance goals are achieved. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: Finding 2024 ¬– 015: (continued) (2) Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity detected through audits, on-site reviews, and written confirmation from the subrecipient, highlighting the status of actions planned or taken to address Single Audit findings related to the particular subaward. (3) Issuing a management decision for applicable audit findings pertaining only to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity as required by §200.521 [Management decision]. (f) Verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F [Audit Requirements] of this part when it is expected that the subrecipient’s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in §200.501 [Audit requirements]. (g) Consider whether the results of the subrecipient’s audit, on-site review, or other monitoring indicate conditions that necessitate adjustments to the pass-through entity’s own records. (h) Consider taking enforcement action against noncompliant subrecipients as described in §200.339 [Remedies for noncompliance] of this part and in program regulations. In order to carry out these responsibilities properly, good internal control dictates that state pass-through agencies ensure subrecipient Single Audit SEFAs are representative of state payment records each year, and that the related federal programs have been properly subjected to Single Audit procedures. 2 CFR §200.512, Report submission, states in part: (a) General. (1) The audit must be completed and the data collection form described in paragraph (b) of this section and reporting package described in paragraph (c) of this section must be submitted within the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor’s report(s), or nine months after the end of the audit period. If the due date falls on a Saturday, Sunday, or Federal holiday, the reporting package is due the next business day. 2 CFR §200.521, Management decision, states in part: (a) General. The management decision must clearly state whether or not the finding is sustained, the reasons for the decision, and the expected auditee action to repay disallowed costs, make financial adjustments, or take other action. (d) Time requirements. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity responsible for issuing a management decision must do so within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. The auditee must initiate and proceed with corrective action as rapidly as possible and corrective action should begin no later than upon receipt of the audit report. 2 CFR §200.505, Sanctions, states: In cases of continued inability or unwillingness to have an audit conducted in accordance with this part, Federal agencies and pass-through entities must take appropriate action as provided in §200.339 [Remedies for noncompliance]. 2 CFR §200.339, Remedies for noncompliance, states in part: If a non-Federal entity fails to comply with the U.S. Constitution, Federal statutes, regulations or the terms and conditions of a Federal award, the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may impose additional conditions, as described in §200.208 [Specific conditions]. If the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity determines that noncompliance cannot be remedied by imposing additional conditions, the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may take one or more of the following actions, as appropriate in the circumstances. Finding 2024 ¬– 015: (continued) (a) Temporarily withhold cash payments pending correction of the deficiency by the non-Federal entity or more severe enforcement action by the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity. (b) Disallow (that is, deny both use of funds and any applicable matching credit for) all or part of the cost of the activity or action not in compliance. (c) Wholly or partly suspend or terminate the Federal award. (d) Initiate suspension or debarment proceedings as authorized under 2 CFR Part 180 and Federal awarding agency regulations (or in the case of a pass-through entity, recommend such a proceeding be initiated by a Federal awarding agency). (e) Withhold further Federal awards for the project or program. (f) Take other remedies that may be legally available. To ensure Commonwealth enforcement of federal regulations for subrecipient noncompliance with audit requirements, Commonwealth Management Directive 325.08, Amended – Remedies for Recipient Noncompliance with Audit Requirements, Section 5 related to policy, states in part: (a) Agencies must develop and implement remedial action that reflects the unique requirements of each program… (b) The remedial action should be implemented within six months from the date the first remedial action is initiated. At the end of the six-month period, the recipient should take the appropriate corrective action or the final stage of remedial action should be imposed on the recipient. Examples of remedial action include, but are not limited to: (1) Meeting or calling the recipient to explain the importance and benefits of the audit and audit resolution processes, emphasizing the value of the audit as an administrative tool and the Commonwealth’s reliance on an acceptable audit and prompt resolution as evidence of the recipient’s ability to properly administer the program. (2) Encouraging the entity to establish an audit committee or designate an individual as the single point of contact to: (a) Communicate regarding the audit. (b) Arrange for and oversee the audit. (c) Direct and monitor audit resolution. (3) Providing technical assistance to the recipient in devising and implementing an appropriate plan to remedy the noncompliance. (4) Withholding a portion of assistance payments until the noncompliance is resolved. (5) Withholding or disallowing overhead costs until the noncompliance is resolved. (6) Suspending the assistance agreement until the noncompliance is resolved. (7) Terminating the assistance agreement with the recipient and, if necessary, seeking alternative entities to administer the program. Finding 2024 ¬– 015: (continued) Management Directive 325.09, Amended – Processing Subrecipient Single Audits of Federal Pass-Through Funds, Section 7 related to procedures, states in part: c. Agencies. (2) Evaluate single audit report submissions received from BAFM to determine program purpose acceptability by verifying, at a minimum, that all agency-funded programs are properly included on the applicable financial schedules; that findings affecting the agency contain sufficient information to facilitate a management decision; and that the subrecipient has submitted an adequate corrective action plan. (5) Issue management decisions relative to audit findings and crosscutting findings assigned to the agency for resolution, as required by 2 CFR §200.521. If responsible for the resolution of crosscutting findings, notify the affected agency or agencies upon resolution of such findings. (6) Impose or coordinate the imposition of remedial action in accordance with 2 CFR Part 200.339 and Management Directive 325.08 Amended, Remedies for Recipient Noncompliance with Audit Requirements, when subrecipients fail to comply with the provisions of Subpart F. Management Directive 325.12, Amended – Standards for Enterprise Risk Management in Commonwealth Agencies, adopted the internal control framework outlined in the United States Government Accountability Office’s, Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government (Green Book). The Green Book states in part: Management should establish and operate monitoring activities to monitor the internal control system and evaluate the results. Management should remediate identified internal control deficiencies on a timely basis. Cause: One reason provided by Commonwealth management for untimely audit resolution in the various agencies, including making management decisions, approving corrective action, and performing procedures to ensure the accuracy of subrecipient SEFAs, was either a change in staff or a lack of staff to follow up and process subrecipient audit reports more timely. Effect: Since required management decisions were not made within six months to ensure appropriate corrective action was taken on audits received from subrecipients, the Commonwealth did not comply with federal regulations, and subrecipients were not made aware of acceptance or rejection of corrective action plans in a timely manner. Further, noncompliance may recur in future periods if control deficiencies are not corrected on a timely basis, and there is an increased risk of unallowable charges being made to federal programs if corrective action and recovery of questioned costs is not timely. Regarding the SEFA reviews or alternate procedures which are not being performed timely, there is an increased risk that subrecipients could be misspending and/or inappropriately tracking and reporting federal funds over multiple year periods, and these discrepancies may not be properly monitored, detected, and corrected by agency personnel on a timely basis as required. Recommendation: We recommend that the above weaknesses that cause untimely subrecipient Single Audit resolution, including untimely management decisions on findings, and untimely review of the SEFA or alternate procedures be corrected to ensure compliance with federal requirements and Commonwealth Management Directives, and to better ensure timelier subrecipient compliance with program requirements. PDOA Response: PDOA agrees with the finding. PDA Response: PDA agrees with the finding. PDE Response: PDE agrees with the finding. DEP Response: DEP agrees with the finding. Finding 2024 ¬– 015: (continued) DHS Response: DHS agrees that there was an exception where human error caused a management decision on one single audit report to be issued untimely; in this instance, the decision itself was made timely but was not communicated in a timely manner. DHS disagrees that an isolated incident due to human error signifies a weakness in internal controls. This was not a systemic issue and therefore should not have been considered a significant deficiency in internal controls, and DHS should not have been included in this finding. Auditors’ Conclusion: The agency responses from PDOA, PDA, PDE, and DEP indicate agreement with the finding. DHS agrees that an error occurred resulting in untimely submission of one management decision, DHS disagrees that the error represents a significant deficiency. We acknowledge the error occurred due to an oversight and is not a systemic error, however, the error resulted in noncompliance with one of two audit reports that required timely management decisions. We will evaluate corrective action in the subsequent audit. The finding remains as stated. Questioned Costs: The amount of questioned costs cannot be determined.
Various Agencies Finding 2024 ¬– 015: ALN 10.565, 10.568, 10.569 – Food Distribution Cluster ALN 15.252 – Abandoned Mine Land Reclamation (AMLR) ALN 21.027 – COVID 19 – Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds ALN 84.425C – COVID 19 – Education Stabilization Fund – GEER Fund ALN 84.425D – COVID 19 – Education Stabilization Fund – ESSER Fund ALN 84.425R – COVID 19 – Education Stabilization Fund – CRRSA EANS Program ALN 84.425U – COVID 19 – Education Stabilization Fund – ARP ESSER ALN 84.425V – COVID 19 – Education Stabilization Fund – ARP EANS Program ALN 84.425W – COVID 19 – Education Stabilization Fund – ARP ESSER HCY ALN 93.044, 93.045, 93.053 – Aging Cluster (including COVID-19) ALN 93.558 – Temporary Assistance for Needy Families ALN 93.667 – Social Services Block Grant A Material Weakness and Material Noncompliance Exist in the Commonwealth’s Subrecipient Audit Resolution Process (A Similar Condition Was Noted in Prior Year Finding 2023-024) Federal Grant Number(s) and Year(s): 228PA100I1003 (6/13/2022 – 6/30/2025), 231PA445Q2204 (10/01/2022 – 9/30/2023), 231PA825Y8005 (10/01/2022 – 9/30/2023), 231PA825Y8105 (10/01/2022 – 9/30/2023), 241PA825Y8005 (10/01/2023 – 9/30/2024), 241PA825Y8105 (10/01/2023 – 9/30/2024), S18AF20004 (11/01/2017 – 10/31/2025), S19AF20004 (12/01/2018 – 11/30/2025), S21AF10015 (1/01/2021 – 12/31/2023), S22AF00017 (1/01/2022 – 12/31/2024), S23AF00002 (11/01/2022 – 10/31/2027), TN75GJE1S7G3 (3/03/2021 – 12/31/2024), S425W210039 (4/23/2021 – 9/30/2024), S425U210028 (3/24/2021– 9/30/2024), S425D210028 (1/05/2021 – 9/30/2024), S425C200013 (5/18/2020 – 4/01/2024), S425R210037 (3/13/2020 – 9/30/2024), S425V210037 (11/16/2021 – 9/30/2024), S425C210013 (3/13/2020 – 9/30/2024), 2101PACMC6 (4/01/2021 – 9/30/2024), 2101PAHDC6 (4/01/2021 – 9/30/2024), 2101PAPHC6 (4/01/2021 – 9/30/2024), 2101PASSC6 (4/01/2021 – 9/30/2024), 2201PAOASS (10/01/2021 – 9/30/2023), 2201PASTPH (1/01/2022 – 9/30/2024), 2301PAOACM (10/01/2022 – 9/30/2024), 2301PAOAHD (10/01/2022 – 9/30/2024), 2301PAOANS (10/01/2022 – 9/30/2024), 2301PAOASS (10/01/2022 – 9/30/2024), 2401PAOACM (10/01/2023 – 9/30/2025), 2401PAOAHD (10/01/2023 – 9/30/2025), 2401PAOANS (10/01/2023 – 9/30/2025), 2401PAOASS (10/01/2023 – 9/30/2025), 2101PATANF (10/01/2020 – 9/30/2021), 2201PATANF (10/01/2021 – 9/30/2022), 2301PATANF (10/01/2022 – 9/30/2023), 2401PATANF (10/01/2023 – 9/30/2024), 2301PASOSR (10/01/2022 – 9/30/2024), 2401PASOSR (10/01/2023 – 9/30/2025), 2301PATANF (10/01/2022 – 9/30/2024), 2401PATANF (10/01/2023 – 9/30/2025) Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance, Other Matters for Abandoned Mine Land Reclamation (AMLR), Temporary Assistance for Needy Families, Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, and Social Services Block Grant Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance, Material Noncompliance for Food Distribution Cluster, Education Stabilization Fund, and Aging Cluster Compliance Requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Condition: Under the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania's (Commonwealth) implementation of the Single Audit Act, review and resolution of subrecipient Single Audit reports is split into two stages. The Office of the Budget’s Bureau of Accounting and Financial Management (OB-BAFM) ensures the reports meet technical standards through a centralized desk review process. The various funding agencies in the Commonwealth are responsible for making a management decision on each finding within six months of the Federal Audit Clearinghouse’s (FAC) Acceptance date for audits subject to Uniform Guidance and to ensure appropriate corrective action is taken by the subrecipient (except for Uniform Guidance Finding 2024 ¬– 015: (continued) audits under U.S. Department of Labor programs which are permitted 12 months for management decisions in accordance with 2 CFR Section 2900.21). Each Commonwealth agency is also responsible for reviewing financial information in each audit report to determine whether the audit included all pass-through funding provided by the agency to ensure pass-through funds were subject to audit. Most agencies meet this requirement by performing Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) reconciliations. The agency is also required to adjust Commonwealth records, if necessary. Our fiscal year ended June 30, 2024 audit of the Commonwealth’s process for review and resolution of subrecipient Single Audits included an evaluation of the Commonwealth’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 subrecipient audit universe for audits due for submission to the FAC during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024. We also evaluated the Commonwealth’s review of 45 subrecipient audit reports with findings in major programs/clusters which were identified on the Commonwealth agencies’ tracking lists during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024 and required management decisions by Commonwealth agencies. Our testing disclosed the following audit exceptions regarding the Commonwealth agencies’ review of subrecipient audit reports: • Pennsylvania Department of Aging (PDOA): Our testing disclosed that PDOA did not have procedures in place to track audit reports including having an audit tracking list. The time period for making a management decision on findings was approximately 17.6 months to over 18 months after the FAC Acceptance date for two out of two audit reports with findings. There was also a delay in PDOA’s procedures to ensure the subrecipient SEFAs were accurate so that major programs were properly determined and subjected to audit. • Department of Agriculture (PDA): Our testing disclosed that PDA did not have procedures in place to track audit reports including having an audit tracking list. The time period for making a management decision on findings was approximately 8.7 months to over 16 months after the FAC Acceptance date for four out of four audit reports with findings. • Department of Education (PDE): The time period for making a management decision on findings was approximately 7.8 months to over 12 months after the FAC Acceptance date for seven out of 22 audit reports with findings. There were additional audit reports with findings listed on PDE’s audit tracking list where management decisions were not made timely. • Department of Environmental Protection (DEP): The time period for making a management decision on findings was approximately 11.6 months to over 12 months after the FAC Acceptance date for two out of two audit reports with findings. Our testing disclosed for the two late audit reports, DEP made management decisions timely. However, DEP did not notify the subrecipients of the management decisions within the required six month time period after the audit reports FAC Acceptance date. • Department of Human Services (DHS): The time period for making a management decision on findings was approximately 7.2 months after the FAC Acceptance date for one out of two audit reports with findings. Our testing disclosed for the one late audit report DHS made a management decision timely. However, DHS did not notify the subrecipient of the management decision within the required six month time period after the audit reports FAC Acceptance date. Criteria: 2 CFR §200.332, Requirements for pass-through entities, states in part: All pass-through entities must: (d) Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward, and that subaward performance goals are achieved. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: Finding 2024 ¬– 015: (continued) (2) Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity detected through audits, on-site reviews, and written confirmation from the subrecipient, highlighting the status of actions planned or taken to address Single Audit findings related to the particular subaward. (3) Issuing a management decision for applicable audit findings pertaining only to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity as required by §200.521 [Management decision]. (f) Verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F [Audit Requirements] of this part when it is expected that the subrecipient’s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in §200.501 [Audit requirements]. (g) Consider whether the results of the subrecipient’s audit, on-site review, or other monitoring indicate conditions that necessitate adjustments to the pass-through entity’s own records. (h) Consider taking enforcement action against noncompliant subrecipients as described in §200.339 [Remedies for noncompliance] of this part and in program regulations. In order to carry out these responsibilities properly, good internal control dictates that state pass-through agencies ensure subrecipient Single Audit SEFAs are representative of state payment records each year, and that the related federal programs have been properly subjected to Single Audit procedures. 2 CFR §200.512, Report submission, states in part: (a) General. (1) The audit must be completed and the data collection form described in paragraph (b) of this section and reporting package described in paragraph (c) of this section must be submitted within the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor’s report(s), or nine months after the end of the audit period. If the due date falls on a Saturday, Sunday, or Federal holiday, the reporting package is due the next business day. 2 CFR §200.521, Management decision, states in part: (a) General. The management decision must clearly state whether or not the finding is sustained, the reasons for the decision, and the expected auditee action to repay disallowed costs, make financial adjustments, or take other action. (d) Time requirements. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity responsible for issuing a management decision must do so within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. The auditee must initiate and proceed with corrective action as rapidly as possible and corrective action should begin no later than upon receipt of the audit report. 2 CFR §200.505, Sanctions, states: In cases of continued inability or unwillingness to have an audit conducted in accordance with this part, Federal agencies and pass-through entities must take appropriate action as provided in §200.339 [Remedies for noncompliance]. 2 CFR §200.339, Remedies for noncompliance, states in part: If a non-Federal entity fails to comply with the U.S. Constitution, Federal statutes, regulations or the terms and conditions of a Federal award, the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may impose additional conditions, as described in §200.208 [Specific conditions]. If the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity determines that noncompliance cannot be remedied by imposing additional conditions, the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may take one or more of the following actions, as appropriate in the circumstances. Finding 2024 ¬– 015: (continued) (a) Temporarily withhold cash payments pending correction of the deficiency by the non-Federal entity or more severe enforcement action by the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity. (b) Disallow (that is, deny both use of funds and any applicable matching credit for) all or part of the cost of the activity or action not in compliance. (c) Wholly or partly suspend or terminate the Federal award. (d) Initiate suspension or debarment proceedings as authorized under 2 CFR Part 180 and Federal awarding agency regulations (or in the case of a pass-through entity, recommend such a proceeding be initiated by a Federal awarding agency). (e) Withhold further Federal awards for the project or program. (f) Take other remedies that may be legally available. To ensure Commonwealth enforcement of federal regulations for subrecipient noncompliance with audit requirements, Commonwealth Management Directive 325.08, Amended – Remedies for Recipient Noncompliance with Audit Requirements, Section 5 related to policy, states in part: (a) Agencies must develop and implement remedial action that reflects the unique requirements of each program… (b) The remedial action should be implemented within six months from the date the first remedial action is initiated. At the end of the six-month period, the recipient should take the appropriate corrective action or the final stage of remedial action should be imposed on the recipient. Examples of remedial action include, but are not limited to: (1) Meeting or calling the recipient to explain the importance and benefits of the audit and audit resolution processes, emphasizing the value of the audit as an administrative tool and the Commonwealth’s reliance on an acceptable audit and prompt resolution as evidence of the recipient’s ability to properly administer the program. (2) Encouraging the entity to establish an audit committee or designate an individual as the single point of contact to: (a) Communicate regarding the audit. (b) Arrange for and oversee the audit. (c) Direct and monitor audit resolution. (3) Providing technical assistance to the recipient in devising and implementing an appropriate plan to remedy the noncompliance. (4) Withholding a portion of assistance payments until the noncompliance is resolved. (5) Withholding or disallowing overhead costs until the noncompliance is resolved. (6) Suspending the assistance agreement until the noncompliance is resolved. (7) Terminating the assistance agreement with the recipient and, if necessary, seeking alternative entities to administer the program. Finding 2024 ¬– 015: (continued) Management Directive 325.09, Amended – Processing Subrecipient Single Audits of Federal Pass-Through Funds, Section 7 related to procedures, states in part: c. Agencies. (2) Evaluate single audit report submissions received from BAFM to determine program purpose acceptability by verifying, at a minimum, that all agency-funded programs are properly included on the applicable financial schedules; that findings affecting the agency contain sufficient information to facilitate a management decision; and that the subrecipient has submitted an adequate corrective action plan. (5) Issue management decisions relative to audit findings and crosscutting findings assigned to the agency for resolution, as required by 2 CFR §200.521. If responsible for the resolution of crosscutting findings, notify the affected agency or agencies upon resolution of such findings. (6) Impose or coordinate the imposition of remedial action in accordance with 2 CFR Part 200.339 and Management Directive 325.08 Amended, Remedies for Recipient Noncompliance with Audit Requirements, when subrecipients fail to comply with the provisions of Subpart F. Management Directive 325.12, Amended – Standards for Enterprise Risk Management in Commonwealth Agencies, adopted the internal control framework outlined in the United States Government Accountability Office’s, Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government (Green Book). The Green Book states in part: Management should establish and operate monitoring activities to monitor the internal control system and evaluate the results. Management should remediate identified internal control deficiencies on a timely basis. Cause: One reason provided by Commonwealth management for untimely audit resolution in the various agencies, including making management decisions, approving corrective action, and performing procedures to ensure the accuracy of subrecipient SEFAs, was either a change in staff or a lack of staff to follow up and process subrecipient audit reports more timely. Effect: Since required management decisions were not made within six months to ensure appropriate corrective action was taken on audits received from subrecipients, the Commonwealth did not comply with federal regulations, and subrecipients were not made aware of acceptance or rejection of corrective action plans in a timely manner. Further, noncompliance may recur in future periods if control deficiencies are not corrected on a timely basis, and there is an increased risk of unallowable charges being made to federal programs if corrective action and recovery of questioned costs is not timely. Regarding the SEFA reviews or alternate procedures which are not being performed timely, there is an increased risk that subrecipients could be misspending and/or inappropriately tracking and reporting federal funds over multiple year periods, and these discrepancies may not be properly monitored, detected, and corrected by agency personnel on a timely basis as required. Recommendation: We recommend that the above weaknesses that cause untimely subrecipient Single Audit resolution, including untimely management decisions on findings, and untimely review of the SEFA or alternate procedures be corrected to ensure compliance with federal requirements and Commonwealth Management Directives, and to better ensure timelier subrecipient compliance with program requirements. PDOA Response: PDOA agrees with the finding. PDA Response: PDA agrees with the finding. PDE Response: PDE agrees with the finding. DEP Response: DEP agrees with the finding. Finding 2024 ¬– 015: (continued) DHS Response: DHS agrees that there was an exception where human error caused a management decision on one single audit report to be issued untimely; in this instance, the decision itself was made timely but was not communicated in a timely manner. DHS disagrees that an isolated incident due to human error signifies a weakness in internal controls. This was not a systemic issue and therefore should not have been considered a significant deficiency in internal controls, and DHS should not have been included in this finding. Auditors’ Conclusion: The agency responses from PDOA, PDA, PDE, and DEP indicate agreement with the finding. DHS agrees that an error occurred resulting in untimely submission of one management decision, DHS disagrees that the error represents a significant deficiency. We acknowledge the error occurred due to an oversight and is not a systemic error, however, the error resulted in noncompliance with one of two audit reports that required timely management decisions. We will evaluate corrective action in the subsequent audit. The finding remains as stated. Questioned Costs: The amount of questioned costs cannot be determined.
Various Agencies Finding 2024 ¬– 015: ALN 10.565, 10.568, 10.569 – Food Distribution Cluster ALN 15.252 – Abandoned Mine Land Reclamation (AMLR) ALN 21.027 – COVID 19 – Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds ALN 84.425C – COVID 19 – Education Stabilization Fund – GEER Fund ALN 84.425D – COVID 19 – Education Stabilization Fund – ESSER Fund ALN 84.425R – COVID 19 – Education Stabilization Fund – CRRSA EANS Program ALN 84.425U – COVID 19 – Education Stabilization Fund – ARP ESSER ALN 84.425V – COVID 19 – Education Stabilization Fund – ARP EANS Program ALN 84.425W – COVID 19 – Education Stabilization Fund – ARP ESSER HCY ALN 93.044, 93.045, 93.053 – Aging Cluster (including COVID-19) ALN 93.558 – Temporary Assistance for Needy Families ALN 93.667 – Social Services Block Grant A Material Weakness and Material Noncompliance Exist in the Commonwealth’s Subrecipient Audit Resolution Process (A Similar Condition Was Noted in Prior Year Finding 2023-024) Federal Grant Number(s) and Year(s): 228PA100I1003 (6/13/2022 – 6/30/2025), 231PA445Q2204 (10/01/2022 – 9/30/2023), 231PA825Y8005 (10/01/2022 – 9/30/2023), 231PA825Y8105 (10/01/2022 – 9/30/2023), 241PA825Y8005 (10/01/2023 – 9/30/2024), 241PA825Y8105 (10/01/2023 – 9/30/2024), S18AF20004 (11/01/2017 – 10/31/2025), S19AF20004 (12/01/2018 – 11/30/2025), S21AF10015 (1/01/2021 – 12/31/2023), S22AF00017 (1/01/2022 – 12/31/2024), S23AF00002 (11/01/2022 – 10/31/2027), TN75GJE1S7G3 (3/03/2021 – 12/31/2024), S425W210039 (4/23/2021 – 9/30/2024), S425U210028 (3/24/2021– 9/30/2024), S425D210028 (1/05/2021 – 9/30/2024), S425C200013 (5/18/2020 – 4/01/2024), S425R210037 (3/13/2020 – 9/30/2024), S425V210037 (11/16/2021 – 9/30/2024), S425C210013 (3/13/2020 – 9/30/2024), 2101PACMC6 (4/01/2021 – 9/30/2024), 2101PAHDC6 (4/01/2021 – 9/30/2024), 2101PAPHC6 (4/01/2021 – 9/30/2024), 2101PASSC6 (4/01/2021 – 9/30/2024), 2201PAOASS (10/01/2021 – 9/30/2023), 2201PASTPH (1/01/2022 – 9/30/2024), 2301PAOACM (10/01/2022 – 9/30/2024), 2301PAOAHD (10/01/2022 – 9/30/2024), 2301PAOANS (10/01/2022 – 9/30/2024), 2301PAOASS (10/01/2022 – 9/30/2024), 2401PAOACM (10/01/2023 – 9/30/2025), 2401PAOAHD (10/01/2023 – 9/30/2025), 2401PAOANS (10/01/2023 – 9/30/2025), 2401PAOASS (10/01/2023 – 9/30/2025), 2101PATANF (10/01/2020 – 9/30/2021), 2201PATANF (10/01/2021 – 9/30/2022), 2301PATANF (10/01/2022 – 9/30/2023), 2401PATANF (10/01/2023 – 9/30/2024), 2301PASOSR (10/01/2022 – 9/30/2024), 2401PASOSR (10/01/2023 – 9/30/2025), 2301PATANF (10/01/2022 – 9/30/2024), 2401PATANF (10/01/2023 – 9/30/2025) Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance, Other Matters for Abandoned Mine Land Reclamation (AMLR), Temporary Assistance for Needy Families, Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, and Social Services Block Grant Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance, Material Noncompliance for Food Distribution Cluster, Education Stabilization Fund, and Aging Cluster Compliance Requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Condition: Under the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania's (Commonwealth) implementation of the Single Audit Act, review and resolution of subrecipient Single Audit reports is split into two stages. The Office of the Budget’s Bureau of Accounting and Financial Management (OB-BAFM) ensures the reports meet technical standards through a centralized desk review process. The various funding agencies in the Commonwealth are responsible for making a management decision on each finding within six months of the Federal Audit Clearinghouse’s (FAC) Acceptance date for audits subject to Uniform Guidance and to ensure appropriate corrective action is taken by the subrecipient (except for Uniform Guidance Finding 2024 ¬– 015: (continued) audits under U.S. Department of Labor programs which are permitted 12 months for management decisions in accordance with 2 CFR Section 2900.21). Each Commonwealth agency is also responsible for reviewing financial information in each audit report to determine whether the audit included all pass-through funding provided by the agency to ensure pass-through funds were subject to audit. Most agencies meet this requirement by performing Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) reconciliations. The agency is also required to adjust Commonwealth records, if necessary. Our fiscal year ended June 30, 2024 audit of the Commonwealth’s process for review and resolution of subrecipient Single Audits included an evaluation of the Commonwealth’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 subrecipient audit universe for audits due for submission to the FAC during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024. We also evaluated the Commonwealth’s review of 45 subrecipient audit reports with findings in major programs/clusters which were identified on the Commonwealth agencies’ tracking lists during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024 and required management decisions by Commonwealth agencies. Our testing disclosed the following audit exceptions regarding the Commonwealth agencies’ review of subrecipient audit reports: • Pennsylvania Department of Aging (PDOA): Our testing disclosed that PDOA did not have procedures in place to track audit reports including having an audit tracking list. The time period for making a management decision on findings was approximately 17.6 months to over 18 months after the FAC Acceptance date for two out of two audit reports with findings. There was also a delay in PDOA’s procedures to ensure the subrecipient SEFAs were accurate so that major programs were properly determined and subjected to audit. • Department of Agriculture (PDA): Our testing disclosed that PDA did not have procedures in place to track audit reports including having an audit tracking list. The time period for making a management decision on findings was approximately 8.7 months to over 16 months after the FAC Acceptance date for four out of four audit reports with findings. • Department of Education (PDE): The time period for making a management decision on findings was approximately 7.8 months to over 12 months after the FAC Acceptance date for seven out of 22 audit reports with findings. There were additional audit reports with findings listed on PDE’s audit tracking list where management decisions were not made timely. • Department of Environmental Protection (DEP): The time period for making a management decision on findings was approximately 11.6 months to over 12 months after the FAC Acceptance date for two out of two audit reports with findings. Our testing disclosed for the two late audit reports, DEP made management decisions timely. However, DEP did not notify the subrecipients of the management decisions within the required six month time period after the audit reports FAC Acceptance date. • Department of Human Services (DHS): The time period for making a management decision on findings was approximately 7.2 months after the FAC Acceptance date for one out of two audit reports with findings. Our testing disclosed for the one late audit report DHS made a management decision timely. However, DHS did not notify the subrecipient of the management decision within the required six month time period after the audit reports FAC Acceptance date. Criteria: 2 CFR §200.332, Requirements for pass-through entities, states in part: All pass-through entities must: (d) Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward, and that subaward performance goals are achieved. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: Finding 2024 ¬– 015: (continued) (2) Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity detected through audits, on-site reviews, and written confirmation from the subrecipient, highlighting the status of actions planned or taken to address Single Audit findings related to the particular subaward. (3) Issuing a management decision for applicable audit findings pertaining only to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity as required by §200.521 [Management decision]. (f) Verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F [Audit Requirements] of this part when it is expected that the subrecipient’s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in §200.501 [Audit requirements]. (g) Consider whether the results of the subrecipient’s audit, on-site review, or other monitoring indicate conditions that necessitate adjustments to the pass-through entity’s own records. (h) Consider taking enforcement action against noncompliant subrecipients as described in §200.339 [Remedies for noncompliance] of this part and in program regulations. In order to carry out these responsibilities properly, good internal control dictates that state pass-through agencies ensure subrecipient Single Audit SEFAs are representative of state payment records each year, and that the related federal programs have been properly subjected to Single Audit procedures. 2 CFR §200.512, Report submission, states in part: (a) General. (1) The audit must be completed and the data collection form described in paragraph (b) of this section and reporting package described in paragraph (c) of this section must be submitted within the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor’s report(s), or nine months after the end of the audit period. If the due date falls on a Saturday, Sunday, or Federal holiday, the reporting package is due the next business day. 2 CFR §200.521, Management decision, states in part: (a) General. The management decision must clearly state whether or not the finding is sustained, the reasons for the decision, and the expected auditee action to repay disallowed costs, make financial adjustments, or take other action. (d) Time requirements. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity responsible for issuing a management decision must do so within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. The auditee must initiate and proceed with corrective action as rapidly as possible and corrective action should begin no later than upon receipt of the audit report. 2 CFR §200.505, Sanctions, states: In cases of continued inability or unwillingness to have an audit conducted in accordance with this part, Federal agencies and pass-through entities must take appropriate action as provided in §200.339 [Remedies for noncompliance]. 2 CFR §200.339, Remedies for noncompliance, states in part: If a non-Federal entity fails to comply with the U.S. Constitution, Federal statutes, regulations or the terms and conditions of a Federal award, the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may impose additional conditions, as described in §200.208 [Specific conditions]. If the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity determines that noncompliance cannot be remedied by imposing additional conditions, the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may take one or more of the following actions, as appropriate in the circumstances. Finding 2024 ¬– 015: (continued) (a) Temporarily withhold cash payments pending correction of the deficiency by the non-Federal entity or more severe enforcement action by the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity. (b) Disallow (that is, deny both use of funds and any applicable matching credit for) all or part of the cost of the activity or action not in compliance. (c) Wholly or partly suspend or terminate the Federal award. (d) Initiate suspension or debarment proceedings as authorized under 2 CFR Part 180 and Federal awarding agency regulations (or in the case of a pass-through entity, recommend such a proceeding be initiated by a Federal awarding agency). (e) Withhold further Federal awards for the project or program. (f) Take other remedies that may be legally available. To ensure Commonwealth enforcement of federal regulations for subrecipient noncompliance with audit requirements, Commonwealth Management Directive 325.08, Amended – Remedies for Recipient Noncompliance with Audit Requirements, Section 5 related to policy, states in part: (a) Agencies must develop and implement remedial action that reflects the unique requirements of each program… (b) The remedial action should be implemented within six months from the date the first remedial action is initiated. At the end of the six-month period, the recipient should take the appropriate corrective action or the final stage of remedial action should be imposed on the recipient. Examples of remedial action include, but are not limited to: (1) Meeting or calling the recipient to explain the importance and benefits of the audit and audit resolution processes, emphasizing the value of the audit as an administrative tool and the Commonwealth’s reliance on an acceptable audit and prompt resolution as evidence of the recipient’s ability to properly administer the program. (2) Encouraging the entity to establish an audit committee or designate an individual as the single point of contact to: (a) Communicate regarding the audit. (b) Arrange for and oversee the audit. (c) Direct and monitor audit resolution. (3) Providing technical assistance to the recipient in devising and implementing an appropriate plan to remedy the noncompliance. (4) Withholding a portion of assistance payments until the noncompliance is resolved. (5) Withholding or disallowing overhead costs until the noncompliance is resolved. (6) Suspending the assistance agreement until the noncompliance is resolved. (7) Terminating the assistance agreement with the recipient and, if necessary, seeking alternative entities to administer the program. Finding 2024 ¬– 015: (continued) Management Directive 325.09, Amended – Processing Subrecipient Single Audits of Federal Pass-Through Funds, Section 7 related to procedures, states in part: c. Agencies. (2) Evaluate single audit report submissions received from BAFM to determine program purpose acceptability by verifying, at a minimum, that all agency-funded programs are properly included on the applicable financial schedules; that findings affecting the agency contain sufficient information to facilitate a management decision; and that the subrecipient has submitted an adequate corrective action plan. (5) Issue management decisions relative to audit findings and crosscutting findings assigned to the agency for resolution, as required by 2 CFR §200.521. If responsible for the resolution of crosscutting findings, notify the affected agency or agencies upon resolution of such findings. (6) Impose or coordinate the imposition of remedial action in accordance with 2 CFR Part 200.339 and Management Directive 325.08 Amended, Remedies for Recipient Noncompliance with Audit Requirements, when subrecipients fail to comply with the provisions of Subpart F. Management Directive 325.12, Amended – Standards for Enterprise Risk Management in Commonwealth Agencies, adopted the internal control framework outlined in the United States Government Accountability Office’s, Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government (Green Book). The Green Book states in part: Management should establish and operate monitoring activities to monitor the internal control system and evaluate the results. Management should remediate identified internal control deficiencies on a timely basis. Cause: One reason provided by Commonwealth management for untimely audit resolution in the various agencies, including making management decisions, approving corrective action, and performing procedures to ensure the accuracy of subrecipient SEFAs, was either a change in staff or a lack of staff to follow up and process subrecipient audit reports more timely. Effect: Since required management decisions were not made within six months to ensure appropriate corrective action was taken on audits received from subrecipients, the Commonwealth did not comply with federal regulations, and subrecipients were not made aware of acceptance or rejection of corrective action plans in a timely manner. Further, noncompliance may recur in future periods if control deficiencies are not corrected on a timely basis, and there is an increased risk of unallowable charges being made to federal programs if corrective action and recovery of questioned costs is not timely. Regarding the SEFA reviews or alternate procedures which are not being performed timely, there is an increased risk that subrecipients could be misspending and/or inappropriately tracking and reporting federal funds over multiple year periods, and these discrepancies may not be properly monitored, detected, and corrected by agency personnel on a timely basis as required. Recommendation: We recommend that the above weaknesses that cause untimely subrecipient Single Audit resolution, including untimely management decisions on findings, and untimely review of the SEFA or alternate procedures be corrected to ensure compliance with federal requirements and Commonwealth Management Directives, and to better ensure timelier subrecipient compliance with program requirements. PDOA Response: PDOA agrees with the finding. PDA Response: PDA agrees with the finding. PDE Response: PDE agrees with the finding. DEP Response: DEP agrees with the finding. Finding 2024 ¬– 015: (continued) DHS Response: DHS agrees that there was an exception where human error caused a management decision on one single audit report to be issued untimely; in this instance, the decision itself was made timely but was not communicated in a timely manner. DHS disagrees that an isolated incident due to human error signifies a weakness in internal controls. This was not a systemic issue and therefore should not have been considered a significant deficiency in internal controls, and DHS should not have been included in this finding. Auditors’ Conclusion: The agency responses from PDOA, PDA, PDE, and DEP indicate agreement with the finding. DHS agrees that an error occurred resulting in untimely submission of one management decision, DHS disagrees that the error represents a significant deficiency. We acknowledge the error occurred due to an oversight and is not a systemic error, however, the error resulted in noncompliance with one of two audit reports that required timely management decisions. We will evaluate corrective action in the subsequent audit. The finding remains as stated. Questioned Costs: The amount of questioned costs cannot be determined.
Various Agencies Finding 2024 ¬– 015: ALN 10.565, 10.568, 10.569 – Food Distribution Cluster ALN 15.252 – Abandoned Mine Land Reclamation (AMLR) ALN 21.027 – COVID 19 – Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds ALN 84.425C – COVID 19 – Education Stabilization Fund – GEER Fund ALN 84.425D – COVID 19 – Education Stabilization Fund – ESSER Fund ALN 84.425R – COVID 19 – Education Stabilization Fund – CRRSA EANS Program ALN 84.425U – COVID 19 – Education Stabilization Fund – ARP ESSER ALN 84.425V – COVID 19 – Education Stabilization Fund – ARP EANS Program ALN 84.425W – COVID 19 – Education Stabilization Fund – ARP ESSER HCY ALN 93.044, 93.045, 93.053 – Aging Cluster (including COVID-19) ALN 93.558 – Temporary Assistance for Needy Families ALN 93.667 – Social Services Block Grant A Material Weakness and Material Noncompliance Exist in the Commonwealth’s Subrecipient Audit Resolution Process (A Similar Condition Was Noted in Prior Year Finding 2023-024) Federal Grant Number(s) and Year(s): 228PA100I1003 (6/13/2022 – 6/30/2025), 231PA445Q2204 (10/01/2022 – 9/30/2023), 231PA825Y8005 (10/01/2022 – 9/30/2023), 231PA825Y8105 (10/01/2022 – 9/30/2023), 241PA825Y8005 (10/01/2023 – 9/30/2024), 241PA825Y8105 (10/01/2023 – 9/30/2024), S18AF20004 (11/01/2017 – 10/31/2025), S19AF20004 (12/01/2018 – 11/30/2025), S21AF10015 (1/01/2021 – 12/31/2023), S22AF00017 (1/01/2022 – 12/31/2024), S23AF00002 (11/01/2022 – 10/31/2027), TN75GJE1S7G3 (3/03/2021 – 12/31/2024), S425W210039 (4/23/2021 – 9/30/2024), S425U210028 (3/24/2021– 9/30/2024), S425D210028 (1/05/2021 – 9/30/2024), S425C200013 (5/18/2020 – 4/01/2024), S425R210037 (3/13/2020 – 9/30/2024), S425V210037 (11/16/2021 – 9/30/2024), S425C210013 (3/13/2020 – 9/30/2024), 2101PACMC6 (4/01/2021 – 9/30/2024), 2101PAHDC6 (4/01/2021 – 9/30/2024), 2101PAPHC6 (4/01/2021 – 9/30/2024), 2101PASSC6 (4/01/2021 – 9/30/2024), 2201PAOASS (10/01/2021 – 9/30/2023), 2201PASTPH (1/01/2022 – 9/30/2024), 2301PAOACM (10/01/2022 – 9/30/2024), 2301PAOAHD (10/01/2022 – 9/30/2024), 2301PAOANS (10/01/2022 – 9/30/2024), 2301PAOASS (10/01/2022 – 9/30/2024), 2401PAOACM (10/01/2023 – 9/30/2025), 2401PAOAHD (10/01/2023 – 9/30/2025), 2401PAOANS (10/01/2023 – 9/30/2025), 2401PAOASS (10/01/2023 – 9/30/2025), 2101PATANF (10/01/2020 – 9/30/2021), 2201PATANF (10/01/2021 – 9/30/2022), 2301PATANF (10/01/2022 – 9/30/2023), 2401PATANF (10/01/2023 – 9/30/2024), 2301PASOSR (10/01/2022 – 9/30/2024), 2401PASOSR (10/01/2023 – 9/30/2025), 2301PATANF (10/01/2022 – 9/30/2024), 2401PATANF (10/01/2023 – 9/30/2025) Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance, Other Matters for Abandoned Mine Land Reclamation (AMLR), Temporary Assistance for Needy Families, Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, and Social Services Block Grant Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance, Material Noncompliance for Food Distribution Cluster, Education Stabilization Fund, and Aging Cluster Compliance Requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Condition: Under the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania's (Commonwealth) implementation of the Single Audit Act, review and resolution of subrecipient Single Audit reports is split into two stages. The Office of the Budget’s Bureau of Accounting and Financial Management (OB-BAFM) ensures the reports meet technical standards through a centralized desk review process. The various funding agencies in the Commonwealth are responsible for making a management decision on each finding within six months of the Federal Audit Clearinghouse’s (FAC) Acceptance date for audits subject to Uniform Guidance and to ensure appropriate corrective action is taken by the subrecipient (except for Uniform Guidance Finding 2024 ¬– 015: (continued) audits under U.S. Department of Labor programs which are permitted 12 months for management decisions in accordance with 2 CFR Section 2900.21). Each Commonwealth agency is also responsible for reviewing financial information in each audit report to determine whether the audit included all pass-through funding provided by the agency to ensure pass-through funds were subject to audit. Most agencies meet this requirement by performing Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) reconciliations. The agency is also required to adjust Commonwealth records, if necessary. Our fiscal year ended June 30, 2024 audit of the Commonwealth’s process for review and resolution of subrecipient Single Audits included an evaluation of the Commonwealth’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 subrecipient audit universe for audits due for submission to the FAC during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024. We also evaluated the Commonwealth’s review of 45 subrecipient audit reports with findings in major programs/clusters which were identified on the Commonwealth agencies’ tracking lists during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024 and required management decisions by Commonwealth agencies. Our testing disclosed the following audit exceptions regarding the Commonwealth agencies’ review of subrecipient audit reports: • Pennsylvania Department of Aging (PDOA): Our testing disclosed that PDOA did not have procedures in place to track audit reports including having an audit tracking list. The time period for making a management decision on findings was approximately 17.6 months to over 18 months after the FAC Acceptance date for two out of two audit reports with findings. There was also a delay in PDOA’s procedures to ensure the subrecipient SEFAs were accurate so that major programs were properly determined and subjected to audit. • Department of Agriculture (PDA): Our testing disclosed that PDA did not have procedures in place to track audit reports including having an audit tracking list. The time period for making a management decision on findings was approximately 8.7 months to over 16 months after the FAC Acceptance date for four out of four audit reports with findings. • Department of Education (PDE): The time period for making a management decision on findings was approximately 7.8 months to over 12 months after the FAC Acceptance date for seven out of 22 audit reports with findings. There were additional audit reports with findings listed on PDE’s audit tracking list where management decisions were not made timely. • Department of Environmental Protection (DEP): The time period for making a management decision on findings was approximately 11.6 months to over 12 months after the FAC Acceptance date for two out of two audit reports with findings. Our testing disclosed for the two late audit reports, DEP made management decisions timely. However, DEP did not notify the subrecipients of the management decisions within the required six month time period after the audit reports FAC Acceptance date. • Department of Human Services (DHS): The time period for making a management decision on findings was approximately 7.2 months after the FAC Acceptance date for one out of two audit reports with findings. Our testing disclosed for the one late audit report DHS made a management decision timely. However, DHS did not notify the subrecipient of the management decision within the required six month time period after the audit reports FAC Acceptance date. Criteria: 2 CFR §200.332, Requirements for pass-through entities, states in part: All pass-through entities must: (d) Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward, and that subaward performance goals are achieved. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: Finding 2024 ¬– 015: (continued) (2) Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity detected through audits, on-site reviews, and written confirmation from the subrecipient, highlighting the status of actions planned or taken to address Single Audit findings related to the particular subaward. (3) Issuing a management decision for applicable audit findings pertaining only to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity as required by §200.521 [Management decision]. (f) Verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F [Audit Requirements] of this part when it is expected that the subrecipient’s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in §200.501 [Audit requirements]. (g) Consider whether the results of the subrecipient’s audit, on-site review, or other monitoring indicate conditions that necessitate adjustments to the pass-through entity’s own records. (h) Consider taking enforcement action against noncompliant subrecipients as described in §200.339 [Remedies for noncompliance] of this part and in program regulations. In order to carry out these responsibilities properly, good internal control dictates that state pass-through agencies ensure subrecipient Single Audit SEFAs are representative of state payment records each year, and that the related federal programs have been properly subjected to Single Audit procedures. 2 CFR §200.512, Report submission, states in part: (a) General. (1) The audit must be completed and the data collection form described in paragraph (b) of this section and reporting package described in paragraph (c) of this section must be submitted within the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor’s report(s), or nine months after the end of the audit period. If the due date falls on a Saturday, Sunday, or Federal holiday, the reporting package is due the next business day. 2 CFR §200.521, Management decision, states in part: (a) General. The management decision must clearly state whether or not the finding is sustained, the reasons for the decision, and the expected auditee action to repay disallowed costs, make financial adjustments, or take other action. (d) Time requirements. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity responsible for issuing a management decision must do so within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. The auditee must initiate and proceed with corrective action as rapidly as possible and corrective action should begin no later than upon receipt of the audit report. 2 CFR §200.505, Sanctions, states: In cases of continued inability or unwillingness to have an audit conducted in accordance with this part, Federal agencies and pass-through entities must take appropriate action as provided in §200.339 [Remedies for noncompliance]. 2 CFR §200.339, Remedies for noncompliance, states in part: If a non-Federal entity fails to comply with the U.S. Constitution, Federal statutes, regulations or the terms and conditions of a Federal award, the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may impose additional conditions, as described in §200.208 [Specific conditions]. If the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity determines that noncompliance cannot be remedied by imposing additional conditions, the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may take one or more of the following actions, as appropriate in the circumstances. Finding 2024 ¬– 015: (continued) (a) Temporarily withhold cash payments pending correction of the deficiency by the non-Federal entity or more severe enforcement action by the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity. (b) Disallow (that is, deny both use of funds and any applicable matching credit for) all or part of the cost of the activity or action not in compliance. (c) Wholly or partly suspend or terminate the Federal award. (d) Initiate suspension or debarment proceedings as authorized under 2 CFR Part 180 and Federal awarding agency regulations (or in the case of a pass-through entity, recommend such a proceeding be initiated by a Federal awarding agency). (e) Withhold further Federal awards for the project or program. (f) Take other remedies that may be legally available. To ensure Commonwealth enforcement of federal regulations for subrecipient noncompliance with audit requirements, Commonwealth Management Directive 325.08, Amended – Remedies for Recipient Noncompliance with Audit Requirements, Section 5 related to policy, states in part: (a) Agencies must develop and implement remedial action that reflects the unique requirements of each program… (b) The remedial action should be implemented within six months from the date the first remedial action is initiated. At the end of the six-month period, the recipient should take the appropriate corrective action or the final stage of remedial action should be imposed on the recipient. Examples of remedial action include, but are not limited to: (1) Meeting or calling the recipient to explain the importance and benefits of the audit and audit resolution processes, emphasizing the value of the audit as an administrative tool and the Commonwealth’s reliance on an acceptable audit and prompt resolution as evidence of the recipient’s ability to properly administer the program. (2) Encouraging the entity to establish an audit committee or designate an individual as the single point of contact to: (a) Communicate regarding the audit. (b) Arrange for and oversee the audit. (c) Direct and monitor audit resolution. (3) Providing technical assistance to the recipient in devising and implementing an appropriate plan to remedy the noncompliance. (4) Withholding a portion of assistance payments until the noncompliance is resolved. (5) Withholding or disallowing overhead costs until the noncompliance is resolved. (6) Suspending the assistance agreement until the noncompliance is resolved. (7) Terminating the assistance agreement with the recipient and, if necessary, seeking alternative entities to administer the program. Finding 2024 ¬– 015: (continued) Management Directive 325.09, Amended – Processing Subrecipient Single Audits of Federal Pass-Through Funds, Section 7 related to procedures, states in part: c. Agencies. (2) Evaluate single audit report submissions received from BAFM to determine program purpose acceptability by verifying, at a minimum, that all agency-funded programs are properly included on the applicable financial schedules; that findings affecting the agency contain sufficient information to facilitate a management decision; and that the subrecipient has submitted an adequate corrective action plan. (5) Issue management decisions relative to audit findings and crosscutting findings assigned to the agency for resolution, as required by 2 CFR §200.521. If responsible for the resolution of crosscutting findings, notify the affected agency or agencies upon resolution of such findings. (6) Impose or coordinate the imposition of remedial action in accordance with 2 CFR Part 200.339 and Management Directive 325.08 Amended, Remedies for Recipient Noncompliance with Audit Requirements, when subrecipients fail to comply with the provisions of Subpart F. Management Directive 325.12, Amended – Standards for Enterprise Risk Management in Commonwealth Agencies, adopted the internal control framework outlined in the United States Government Accountability Office’s, Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government (Green Book). The Green Book states in part: Management should establish and operate monitoring activities to monitor the internal control system and evaluate the results. Management should remediate identified internal control deficiencies on a timely basis. Cause: One reason provided by Commonwealth management for untimely audit resolution in the various agencies, including making management decisions, approving corrective action, and performing procedures to ensure the accuracy of subrecipient SEFAs, was either a change in staff or a lack of staff to follow up and process subrecipient audit reports more timely. Effect: Since required management decisions were not made within six months to ensure appropriate corrective action was taken on audits received from subrecipients, the Commonwealth did not comply with federal regulations, and subrecipients were not made aware of acceptance or rejection of corrective action plans in a timely manner. Further, noncompliance may recur in future periods if control deficiencies are not corrected on a timely basis, and there is an increased risk of unallowable charges being made to federal programs if corrective action and recovery of questioned costs is not timely. Regarding the SEFA reviews or alternate procedures which are not being performed timely, there is an increased risk that subrecipients could be misspending and/or inappropriately tracking and reporting federal funds over multiple year periods, and these discrepancies may not be properly monitored, detected, and corrected by agency personnel on a timely basis as required. Recommendation: We recommend that the above weaknesses that cause untimely subrecipient Single Audit resolution, including untimely management decisions on findings, and untimely review of the SEFA or alternate procedures be corrected to ensure compliance with federal requirements and Commonwealth Management Directives, and to better ensure timelier subrecipient compliance with program requirements. PDOA Response: PDOA agrees with the finding. PDA Response: PDA agrees with the finding. PDE Response: PDE agrees with the finding. DEP Response: DEP agrees with the finding. Finding 2024 ¬– 015: (continued) DHS Response: DHS agrees that there was an exception where human error caused a management decision on one single audit report to be issued untimely; in this instance, the decision itself was made timely but was not communicated in a timely manner. DHS disagrees that an isolated incident due to human error signifies a weakness in internal controls. This was not a systemic issue and therefore should not have been considered a significant deficiency in internal controls, and DHS should not have been included in this finding. Auditors’ Conclusion: The agency responses from PDOA, PDA, PDE, and DEP indicate agreement with the finding. DHS agrees that an error occurred resulting in untimely submission of one management decision, DHS disagrees that the error represents a significant deficiency. We acknowledge the error occurred due to an oversight and is not a systemic error, however, the error resulted in noncompliance with one of two audit reports that required timely management decisions. We will evaluate corrective action in the subsequent audit. The finding remains as stated. Questioned Costs: The amount of questioned costs cannot be determined.
Various Agencies Finding 2024 ¬– 015: ALN 10.565, 10.568, 10.569 – Food Distribution Cluster ALN 15.252 – Abandoned Mine Land Reclamation (AMLR) ALN 21.027 – COVID 19 – Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds ALN 84.425C – COVID 19 – Education Stabilization Fund – GEER Fund ALN 84.425D – COVID 19 – Education Stabilization Fund – ESSER Fund ALN 84.425R – COVID 19 – Education Stabilization Fund – CRRSA EANS Program ALN 84.425U – COVID 19 – Education Stabilization Fund – ARP ESSER ALN 84.425V – COVID 19 – Education Stabilization Fund – ARP EANS Program ALN 84.425W – COVID 19 – Education Stabilization Fund – ARP ESSER HCY ALN 93.044, 93.045, 93.053 – Aging Cluster (including COVID-19) ALN 93.558 – Temporary Assistance for Needy Families ALN 93.667 – Social Services Block Grant A Material Weakness and Material Noncompliance Exist in the Commonwealth’s Subrecipient Audit Resolution Process (A Similar Condition Was Noted in Prior Year Finding 2023-024) Federal Grant Number(s) and Year(s): 228PA100I1003 (6/13/2022 – 6/30/2025), 231PA445Q2204 (10/01/2022 – 9/30/2023), 231PA825Y8005 (10/01/2022 – 9/30/2023), 231PA825Y8105 (10/01/2022 – 9/30/2023), 241PA825Y8005 (10/01/2023 – 9/30/2024), 241PA825Y8105 (10/01/2023 – 9/30/2024), S18AF20004 (11/01/2017 – 10/31/2025), S19AF20004 (12/01/2018 – 11/30/2025), S21AF10015 (1/01/2021 – 12/31/2023), S22AF00017 (1/01/2022 – 12/31/2024), S23AF00002 (11/01/2022 – 10/31/2027), TN75GJE1S7G3 (3/03/2021 – 12/31/2024), S425W210039 (4/23/2021 – 9/30/2024), S425U210028 (3/24/2021– 9/30/2024), S425D210028 (1/05/2021 – 9/30/2024), S425C200013 (5/18/2020 – 4/01/2024), S425R210037 (3/13/2020 – 9/30/2024), S425V210037 (11/16/2021 – 9/30/2024), S425C210013 (3/13/2020 – 9/30/2024), 2101PACMC6 (4/01/2021 – 9/30/2024), 2101PAHDC6 (4/01/2021 – 9/30/2024), 2101PAPHC6 (4/01/2021 – 9/30/2024), 2101PASSC6 (4/01/2021 – 9/30/2024), 2201PAOASS (10/01/2021 – 9/30/2023), 2201PASTPH (1/01/2022 – 9/30/2024), 2301PAOACM (10/01/2022 – 9/30/2024), 2301PAOAHD (10/01/2022 – 9/30/2024), 2301PAOANS (10/01/2022 – 9/30/2024), 2301PAOASS (10/01/2022 – 9/30/2024), 2401PAOACM (10/01/2023 – 9/30/2025), 2401PAOAHD (10/01/2023 – 9/30/2025), 2401PAOANS (10/01/2023 – 9/30/2025), 2401PAOASS (10/01/2023 – 9/30/2025), 2101PATANF (10/01/2020 – 9/30/2021), 2201PATANF (10/01/2021 – 9/30/2022), 2301PATANF (10/01/2022 – 9/30/2023), 2401PATANF (10/01/2023 – 9/30/2024), 2301PASOSR (10/01/2022 – 9/30/2024), 2401PASOSR (10/01/2023 – 9/30/2025), 2301PATANF (10/01/2022 – 9/30/2024), 2401PATANF (10/01/2023 – 9/30/2025) Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance, Other Matters for Abandoned Mine Land Reclamation (AMLR), Temporary Assistance for Needy Families, Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, and Social Services Block Grant Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance, Material Noncompliance for Food Distribution Cluster, Education Stabilization Fund, and Aging Cluster Compliance Requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Condition: Under the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania's (Commonwealth) implementation of the Single Audit Act, review and resolution of subrecipient Single Audit reports is split into two stages. The Office of the Budget’s Bureau of Accounting and Financial Management (OB-BAFM) ensures the reports meet technical standards through a centralized desk review process. The various funding agencies in the Commonwealth are responsible for making a management decision on each finding within six months of the Federal Audit Clearinghouse’s (FAC) Acceptance date for audits subject to Uniform Guidance and to ensure appropriate corrective action is taken by the subrecipient (except for Uniform Guidance Finding 2024 ¬– 015: (continued) audits under U.S. Department of Labor programs which are permitted 12 months for management decisions in accordance with 2 CFR Section 2900.21). Each Commonwealth agency is also responsible for reviewing financial information in each audit report to determine whether the audit included all pass-through funding provided by the agency to ensure pass-through funds were subject to audit. Most agencies meet this requirement by performing Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) reconciliations. The agency is also required to adjust Commonwealth records, if necessary. Our fiscal year ended June 30, 2024 audit of the Commonwealth’s process for review and resolution of subrecipient Single Audits included an evaluation of the Commonwealth’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 subrecipient audit universe for audits due for submission to the FAC during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024. We also evaluated the Commonwealth’s review of 45 subrecipient audit reports with findings in major programs/clusters which were identified on the Commonwealth agencies’ tracking lists during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024 and required management decisions by Commonwealth agencies. Our testing disclosed the following audit exceptions regarding the Commonwealth agencies’ review of subrecipient audit reports: • Pennsylvania Department of Aging (PDOA): Our testing disclosed that PDOA did not have procedures in place to track audit reports including having an audit tracking list. The time period for making a management decision on findings was approximately 17.6 months to over 18 months after the FAC Acceptance date for two out of two audit reports with findings. There was also a delay in PDOA’s procedures to ensure the subrecipient SEFAs were accurate so that major programs were properly determined and subjected to audit. • Department of Agriculture (PDA): Our testing disclosed that PDA did not have procedures in place to track audit reports including having an audit tracking list. The time period for making a management decision on findings was approximately 8.7 months to over 16 months after the FAC Acceptance date for four out of four audit reports with findings. • Department of Education (PDE): The time period for making a management decision on findings was approximately 7.8 months to over 12 months after the FAC Acceptance date for seven out of 22 audit reports with findings. There were additional audit reports with findings listed on PDE’s audit tracking list where management decisions were not made timely. • Department of Environmental Protection (DEP): The time period for making a management decision on findings was approximately 11.6 months to over 12 months after the FAC Acceptance date for two out of two audit reports with findings. Our testing disclosed for the two late audit reports, DEP made management decisions timely. However, DEP did not notify the subrecipients of the management decisions within the required six month time period after the audit reports FAC Acceptance date. • Department of Human Services (DHS): The time period for making a management decision on findings was approximately 7.2 months after the FAC Acceptance date for one out of two audit reports with findings. Our testing disclosed for the one late audit report DHS made a management decision timely. However, DHS did not notify the subrecipient of the management decision within the required six month time period after the audit reports FAC Acceptance date. Criteria: 2 CFR §200.332, Requirements for pass-through entities, states in part: All pass-through entities must: (d) Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward, and that subaward performance goals are achieved. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: Finding 2024 ¬– 015: (continued) (2) Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity detected through audits, on-site reviews, and written confirmation from the subrecipient, highlighting the status of actions planned or taken to address Single Audit findings related to the particular subaward. (3) Issuing a management decision for applicable audit findings pertaining only to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity as required by §200.521 [Management decision]. (f) Verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F [Audit Requirements] of this part when it is expected that the subrecipient’s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in §200.501 [Audit requirements]. (g) Consider whether the results of the subrecipient’s audit, on-site review, or other monitoring indicate conditions that necessitate adjustments to the pass-through entity’s own records. (h) Consider taking enforcement action against noncompliant subrecipients as described in §200.339 [Remedies for noncompliance] of this part and in program regulations. In order to carry out these responsibilities properly, good internal control dictates that state pass-through agencies ensure subrecipient Single Audit SEFAs are representative of state payment records each year, and that the related federal programs have been properly subjected to Single Audit procedures. 2 CFR §200.512, Report submission, states in part: (a) General. (1) The audit must be completed and the data collection form described in paragraph (b) of this section and reporting package described in paragraph (c) of this section must be submitted within the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor’s report(s), or nine months after the end of the audit period. If the due date falls on a Saturday, Sunday, or Federal holiday, the reporting package is due the next business day. 2 CFR §200.521, Management decision, states in part: (a) General. The management decision must clearly state whether or not the finding is sustained, the reasons for the decision, and the expected auditee action to repay disallowed costs, make financial adjustments, or take other action. (d) Time requirements. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity responsible for issuing a management decision must do so within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. The auditee must initiate and proceed with corrective action as rapidly as possible and corrective action should begin no later than upon receipt of the audit report. 2 CFR §200.505, Sanctions, states: In cases of continued inability or unwillingness to have an audit conducted in accordance with this part, Federal agencies and pass-through entities must take appropriate action as provided in §200.339 [Remedies for noncompliance]. 2 CFR §200.339, Remedies for noncompliance, states in part: If a non-Federal entity fails to comply with the U.S. Constitution, Federal statutes, regulations or the terms and conditions of a Federal award, the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may impose additional conditions, as described in §200.208 [Specific conditions]. If the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity determines that noncompliance cannot be remedied by imposing additional conditions, the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may take one or more of the following actions, as appropriate in the circumstances. Finding 2024 ¬– 015: (continued) (a) Temporarily withhold cash payments pending correction of the deficiency by the non-Federal entity or more severe enforcement action by the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity. (b) Disallow (that is, deny both use of funds and any applicable matching credit for) all or part of the cost of the activity or action not in compliance. (c) Wholly or partly suspend or terminate the Federal award. (d) Initiate suspension or debarment proceedings as authorized under 2 CFR Part 180 and Federal awarding agency regulations (or in the case of a pass-through entity, recommend such a proceeding be initiated by a Federal awarding agency). (e) Withhold further Federal awards for the project or program. (f) Take other remedies that may be legally available. To ensure Commonwealth enforcement of federal regulations for subrecipient noncompliance with audit requirements, Commonwealth Management Directive 325.08, Amended – Remedies for Recipient Noncompliance with Audit Requirements, Section 5 related to policy, states in part: (a) Agencies must develop and implement remedial action that reflects the unique requirements of each program… (b) The remedial action should be implemented within six months from the date the first remedial action is initiated. At the end of the six-month period, the recipient should take the appropriate corrective action or the final stage of remedial action should be imposed on the recipient. Examples of remedial action include, but are not limited to: (1) Meeting or calling the recipient to explain the importance and benefits of the audit and audit resolution processes, emphasizing the value of the audit as an administrative tool and the Commonwealth’s reliance on an acceptable audit and prompt resolution as evidence of the recipient’s ability to properly administer the program. (2) Encouraging the entity to establish an audit committee or designate an individual as the single point of contact to: (a) Communicate regarding the audit. (b) Arrange for and oversee the audit. (c) Direct and monitor audit resolution. (3) Providing technical assistance to the recipient in devising and implementing an appropriate plan to remedy the noncompliance. (4) Withholding a portion of assistance payments until the noncompliance is resolved. (5) Withholding or disallowing overhead costs until the noncompliance is resolved. (6) Suspending the assistance agreement until the noncompliance is resolved. (7) Terminating the assistance agreement with the recipient and, if necessary, seeking alternative entities to administer the program. Finding 2024 ¬– 015: (continued) Management Directive 325.09, Amended – Processing Subrecipient Single Audits of Federal Pass-Through Funds, Section 7 related to procedures, states in part: c. Agencies. (2) Evaluate single audit report submissions received from BAFM to determine program purpose acceptability by verifying, at a minimum, that all agency-funded programs are properly included on the applicable financial schedules; that findings affecting the agency contain sufficient information to facilitate a management decision; and that the subrecipient has submitted an adequate corrective action plan. (5) Issue management decisions relative to audit findings and crosscutting findings assigned to the agency for resolution, as required by 2 CFR §200.521. If responsible for the resolution of crosscutting findings, notify the affected agency or agencies upon resolution of such findings. (6) Impose or coordinate the imposition of remedial action in accordance with 2 CFR Part 200.339 and Management Directive 325.08 Amended, Remedies for Recipient Noncompliance with Audit Requirements, when subrecipients fail to comply with the provisions of Subpart F. Management Directive 325.12, Amended – Standards for Enterprise Risk Management in Commonwealth Agencies, adopted the internal control framework outlined in the United States Government Accountability Office’s, Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government (Green Book). The Green Book states in part: Management should establish and operate monitoring activities to monitor the internal control system and evaluate the results. Management should remediate identified internal control deficiencies on a timely basis. Cause: One reason provided by Commonwealth management for untimely audit resolution in the various agencies, including making management decisions, approving corrective action, and performing procedures to ensure the accuracy of subrecipient SEFAs, was either a change in staff or a lack of staff to follow up and process subrecipient audit reports more timely. Effect: Since required management decisions were not made within six months to ensure appropriate corrective action was taken on audits received from subrecipients, the Commonwealth did not comply with federal regulations, and subrecipients were not made aware of acceptance or rejection of corrective action plans in a timely manner. Further, noncompliance may recur in future periods if control deficiencies are not corrected on a timely basis, and there is an increased risk of unallowable charges being made to federal programs if corrective action and recovery of questioned costs is not timely. Regarding the SEFA reviews or alternate procedures which are not being performed timely, there is an increased risk that subrecipients could be misspending and/or inappropriately tracking and reporting federal funds over multiple year periods, and these discrepancies may not be properly monitored, detected, and corrected by agency personnel on a timely basis as required. Recommendation: We recommend that the above weaknesses that cause untimely subrecipient Single Audit resolution, including untimely management decisions on findings, and untimely review of the SEFA or alternate procedures be corrected to ensure compliance with federal requirements and Commonwealth Management Directives, and to better ensure timelier subrecipient compliance with program requirements. PDOA Response: PDOA agrees with the finding. PDA Response: PDA agrees with the finding. PDE Response: PDE agrees with the finding. DEP Response: DEP agrees with the finding. Finding 2024 ¬– 015: (continued) DHS Response: DHS agrees that there was an exception where human error caused a management decision on one single audit report to be issued untimely; in this instance, the decision itself was made timely but was not communicated in a timely manner. DHS disagrees that an isolated incident due to human error signifies a weakness in internal controls. This was not a systemic issue and therefore should not have been considered a significant deficiency in internal controls, and DHS should not have been included in this finding. Auditors’ Conclusion: The agency responses from PDOA, PDA, PDE, and DEP indicate agreement with the finding. DHS agrees that an error occurred resulting in untimely submission of one management decision, DHS disagrees that the error represents a significant deficiency. We acknowledge the error occurred due to an oversight and is not a systemic error, however, the error resulted in noncompliance with one of two audit reports that required timely management decisions. We will evaluate corrective action in the subsequent audit. The finding remains as stated. Questioned Costs: The amount of questioned costs cannot be determined.
Various Agencies Finding 2024 ¬– 015: ALN 10.565, 10.568, 10.569 – Food Distribution Cluster ALN 15.252 – Abandoned Mine Land Reclamation (AMLR) ALN 21.027 – COVID 19 – Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds ALN 84.425C – COVID 19 – Education Stabilization Fund – GEER Fund ALN 84.425D – COVID 19 – Education Stabilization Fund – ESSER Fund ALN 84.425R – COVID 19 – Education Stabilization Fund – CRRSA EANS Program ALN 84.425U – COVID 19 – Education Stabilization Fund – ARP ESSER ALN 84.425V – COVID 19 – Education Stabilization Fund – ARP EANS Program ALN 84.425W – COVID 19 – Education Stabilization Fund – ARP ESSER HCY ALN 93.044, 93.045, 93.053 – Aging Cluster (including COVID-19) ALN 93.558 – Temporary Assistance for Needy Families ALN 93.667 – Social Services Block Grant A Material Weakness and Material Noncompliance Exist in the Commonwealth’s Subrecipient Audit Resolution Process (A Similar Condition Was Noted in Prior Year Finding 2023-024) Federal Grant Number(s) and Year(s): 228PA100I1003 (6/13/2022 – 6/30/2025), 231PA445Q2204 (10/01/2022 – 9/30/2023), 231PA825Y8005 (10/01/2022 – 9/30/2023), 231PA825Y8105 (10/01/2022 – 9/30/2023), 241PA825Y8005 (10/01/2023 – 9/30/2024), 241PA825Y8105 (10/01/2023 – 9/30/2024), S18AF20004 (11/01/2017 – 10/31/2025), S19AF20004 (12/01/2018 – 11/30/2025), S21AF10015 (1/01/2021 – 12/31/2023), S22AF00017 (1/01/2022 – 12/31/2024), S23AF00002 (11/01/2022 – 10/31/2027), TN75GJE1S7G3 (3/03/2021 – 12/31/2024), S425W210039 (4/23/2021 – 9/30/2024), S425U210028 (3/24/2021– 9/30/2024), S425D210028 (1/05/2021 – 9/30/2024), S425C200013 (5/18/2020 – 4/01/2024), S425R210037 (3/13/2020 – 9/30/2024), S425V210037 (11/16/2021 – 9/30/2024), S425C210013 (3/13/2020 – 9/30/2024), 2101PACMC6 (4/01/2021 – 9/30/2024), 2101PAHDC6 (4/01/2021 – 9/30/2024), 2101PAPHC6 (4/01/2021 – 9/30/2024), 2101PASSC6 (4/01/2021 – 9/30/2024), 2201PAOASS (10/01/2021 – 9/30/2023), 2201PASTPH (1/01/2022 – 9/30/2024), 2301PAOACM (10/01/2022 – 9/30/2024), 2301PAOAHD (10/01/2022 – 9/30/2024), 2301PAOANS (10/01/2022 – 9/30/2024), 2301PAOASS (10/01/2022 – 9/30/2024), 2401PAOACM (10/01/2023 – 9/30/2025), 2401PAOAHD (10/01/2023 – 9/30/2025), 2401PAOANS (10/01/2023 – 9/30/2025), 2401PAOASS (10/01/2023 – 9/30/2025), 2101PATANF (10/01/2020 – 9/30/2021), 2201PATANF (10/01/2021 – 9/30/2022), 2301PATANF (10/01/2022 – 9/30/2023), 2401PATANF (10/01/2023 – 9/30/2024), 2301PASOSR (10/01/2022 – 9/30/2024), 2401PASOSR (10/01/2023 – 9/30/2025), 2301PATANF (10/01/2022 – 9/30/2024), 2401PATANF (10/01/2023 – 9/30/2025) Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance, Other Matters for Abandoned Mine Land Reclamation (AMLR), Temporary Assistance for Needy Families, Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, and Social Services Block Grant Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance, Material Noncompliance for Food Distribution Cluster, Education Stabilization Fund, and Aging Cluster Compliance Requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Condition: Under the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania's (Commonwealth) implementation of the Single Audit Act, review and resolution of subrecipient Single Audit reports is split into two stages. The Office of the Budget’s Bureau of Accounting and Financial Management (OB-BAFM) ensures the reports meet technical standards through a centralized desk review process. The various funding agencies in the Commonwealth are responsible for making a management decision on each finding within six months of the Federal Audit Clearinghouse’s (FAC) Acceptance date for audits subject to Uniform Guidance and to ensure appropriate corrective action is taken by the subrecipient (except for Uniform Guidance Finding 2024 ¬– 015: (continued) audits under U.S. Department of Labor programs which are permitted 12 months for management decisions in accordance with 2 CFR Section 2900.21). Each Commonwealth agency is also responsible for reviewing financial information in each audit report to determine whether the audit included all pass-through funding provided by the agency to ensure pass-through funds were subject to audit. Most agencies meet this requirement by performing Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) reconciliations. The agency is also required to adjust Commonwealth records, if necessary. Our fiscal year ended June 30, 2024 audit of the Commonwealth’s process for review and resolution of subrecipient Single Audits included an evaluation of the Commonwealth’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 subrecipient audit universe for audits due for submission to the FAC during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024. We also evaluated the Commonwealth’s review of 45 subrecipient audit reports with findings in major programs/clusters which were identified on the Commonwealth agencies’ tracking lists during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024 and required management decisions by Commonwealth agencies. Our testing disclosed the following audit exceptions regarding the Commonwealth agencies’ review of subrecipient audit reports: • Pennsylvania Department of Aging (PDOA): Our testing disclosed that PDOA did not have procedures in place to track audit reports including having an audit tracking list. The time period for making a management decision on findings was approximately 17.6 months to over 18 months after the FAC Acceptance date for two out of two audit reports with findings. There was also a delay in PDOA’s procedures to ensure the subrecipient SEFAs were accurate so that major programs were properly determined and subjected to audit. • Department of Agriculture (PDA): Our testing disclosed that PDA did not have procedures in place to track audit reports including having an audit tracking list. The time period for making a management decision on findings was approximately 8.7 months to over 16 months after the FAC Acceptance date for four out of four audit reports with findings. • Department of Education (PDE): The time period for making a management decision on findings was approximately 7.8 months to over 12 months after the FAC Acceptance date for seven out of 22 audit reports with findings. There were additional audit reports with findings listed on PDE’s audit tracking list where management decisions were not made timely. • Department of Environmental Protection (DEP): The time period for making a management decision on findings was approximately 11.6 months to over 12 months after the FAC Acceptance date for two out of two audit reports with findings. Our testing disclosed for the two late audit reports, DEP made management decisions timely. However, DEP did not notify the subrecipients of the management decisions within the required six month time period after the audit reports FAC Acceptance date. • Department of Human Services (DHS): The time period for making a management decision on findings was approximately 7.2 months after the FAC Acceptance date for one out of two audit reports with findings. Our testing disclosed for the one late audit report DHS made a management decision timely. However, DHS did not notify the subrecipient of the management decision within the required six month time period after the audit reports FAC Acceptance date. Criteria: 2 CFR §200.332, Requirements for pass-through entities, states in part: All pass-through entities must: (d) Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward, and that subaward performance goals are achieved. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: Finding 2024 ¬– 015: (continued) (2) Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity detected through audits, on-site reviews, and written confirmation from the subrecipient, highlighting the status of actions planned or taken to address Single Audit findings related to the particular subaward. (3) Issuing a management decision for applicable audit findings pertaining only to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity as required by §200.521 [Management decision]. (f) Verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F [Audit Requirements] of this part when it is expected that the subrecipient’s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in §200.501 [Audit requirements]. (g) Consider whether the results of the subrecipient’s audit, on-site review, or other monitoring indicate conditions that necessitate adjustments to the pass-through entity’s own records. (h) Consider taking enforcement action against noncompliant subrecipients as described in §200.339 [Remedies for noncompliance] of this part and in program regulations. In order to carry out these responsibilities properly, good internal control dictates that state pass-through agencies ensure subrecipient Single Audit SEFAs are representative of state payment records each year, and that the related federal programs have been properly subjected to Single Audit procedures. 2 CFR §200.512, Report submission, states in part: (a) General. (1) The audit must be completed and the data collection form described in paragraph (b) of this section and reporting package described in paragraph (c) of this section must be submitted within the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor’s report(s), or nine months after the end of the audit period. If the due date falls on a Saturday, Sunday, or Federal holiday, the reporting package is due the next business day. 2 CFR §200.521, Management decision, states in part: (a) General. The management decision must clearly state whether or not the finding is sustained, the reasons for the decision, and the expected auditee action to repay disallowed costs, make financial adjustments, or take other action. (d) Time requirements. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity responsible for issuing a management decision must do so within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. The auditee must initiate and proceed with corrective action as rapidly as possible and corrective action should begin no later than upon receipt of the audit report. 2 CFR §200.505, Sanctions, states: In cases of continued inability or unwillingness to have an audit conducted in accordance with this part, Federal agencies and pass-through entities must take appropriate action as provided in §200.339 [Remedies for noncompliance]. 2 CFR §200.339, Remedies for noncompliance, states in part: If a non-Federal entity fails to comply with the U.S. Constitution, Federal statutes, regulations or the terms and conditions of a Federal award, the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may impose additional conditions, as described in §200.208 [Specific conditions]. If the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity determines that noncompliance cannot be remedied by imposing additional conditions, the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may take one or more of the following actions, as appropriate in the circumstances. Finding 2024 ¬– 015: (continued) (a) Temporarily withhold cash payments pending correction of the deficiency by the non-Federal entity or more severe enforcement action by the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity. (b) Disallow (that is, deny both use of funds and any applicable matching credit for) all or part of the cost of the activity or action not in compliance. (c) Wholly or partly suspend or terminate the Federal award. (d) Initiate suspension or debarment proceedings as authorized under 2 CFR Part 180 and Federal awarding agency regulations (or in the case of a pass-through entity, recommend such a proceeding be initiated by a Federal awarding agency). (e) Withhold further Federal awards for the project or program. (f) Take other remedies that may be legally available. To ensure Commonwealth enforcement of federal regulations for subrecipient noncompliance with audit requirements, Commonwealth Management Directive 325.08, Amended – Remedies for Recipient Noncompliance with Audit Requirements, Section 5 related to policy, states in part: (a) Agencies must develop and implement remedial action that reflects the unique requirements of each program… (b) The remedial action should be implemented within six months from the date the first remedial action is initiated. At the end of the six-month period, the recipient should take the appropriate corrective action or the final stage of remedial action should be imposed on the recipient. Examples of remedial action include, but are not limited to: (1) Meeting or calling the recipient to explain the importance and benefits of the audit and audit resolution processes, emphasizing the value of the audit as an administrative tool and the Commonwealth’s reliance on an acceptable audit and prompt resolution as evidence of the recipient’s ability to properly administer the program. (2) Encouraging the entity to establish an audit committee or designate an individual as the single point of contact to: (a) Communicate regarding the audit. (b) Arrange for and oversee the audit. (c) Direct and monitor audit resolution. (3) Providing technical assistance to the recipient in devising and implementing an appropriate plan to remedy the noncompliance. (4) Withholding a portion of assistance payments until the noncompliance is resolved. (5) Withholding or disallowing overhead costs until the noncompliance is resolved. (6) Suspending the assistance agreement until the noncompliance is resolved. (7) Terminating the assistance agreement with the recipient and, if necessary, seeking alternative entities to administer the program. Finding 2024 ¬– 015: (continued) Management Directive 325.09, Amended – Processing Subrecipient Single Audits of Federal Pass-Through Funds, Section 7 related to procedures, states in part: c. Agencies. (2) Evaluate single audit report submissions received from BAFM to determine program purpose acceptability by verifying, at a minimum, that all agency-funded programs are properly included on the applicable financial schedules; that findings affecting the agency contain sufficient information to facilitate a management decision; and that the subrecipient has submitted an adequate corrective action plan. (5) Issue management decisions relative to audit findings and crosscutting findings assigned to the agency for resolution, as required by 2 CFR §200.521. If responsible for the resolution of crosscutting findings, notify the affected agency or agencies upon resolution of such findings. (6) Impose or coordinate the imposition of remedial action in accordance with 2 CFR Part 200.339 and Management Directive 325.08 Amended, Remedies for Recipient Noncompliance with Audit Requirements, when subrecipients fail to comply with the provisions of Subpart F. Management Directive 325.12, Amended – Standards for Enterprise Risk Management in Commonwealth Agencies, adopted the internal control framework outlined in the United States Government Accountability Office’s, Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government (Green Book). The Green Book states in part: Management should establish and operate monitoring activities to monitor the internal control system and evaluate the results. Management should remediate identified internal control deficiencies on a timely basis. Cause: One reason provided by Commonwealth management for untimely audit resolution in the various agencies, including making management decisions, approving corrective action, and performing procedures to ensure the accuracy of subrecipient SEFAs, was either a change in staff or a lack of staff to follow up and process subrecipient audit reports more timely. Effect: Since required management decisions were not made within six months to ensure appropriate corrective action was taken on audits received from subrecipients, the Commonwealth did not comply with federal regulations, and subrecipients were not made aware of acceptance or rejection of corrective action plans in a timely manner. Further, noncompliance may recur in future periods if control deficiencies are not corrected on a timely basis, and there is an increased risk of unallowable charges being made to federal programs if corrective action and recovery of questioned costs is not timely. Regarding the SEFA reviews or alternate procedures which are not being performed timely, there is an increased risk that subrecipients could be misspending and/or inappropriately tracking and reporting federal funds over multiple year periods, and these discrepancies may not be properly monitored, detected, and corrected by agency personnel on a timely basis as required. Recommendation: We recommend that the above weaknesses that cause untimely subrecipient Single Audit resolution, including untimely management decisions on findings, and untimely review of the SEFA or alternate procedures be corrected to ensure compliance with federal requirements and Commonwealth Management Directives, and to better ensure timelier subrecipient compliance with program requirements. PDOA Response: PDOA agrees with the finding. PDA Response: PDA agrees with the finding. PDE Response: PDE agrees with the finding. DEP Response: DEP agrees with the finding. Finding 2024 ¬– 015: (continued) DHS Response: DHS agrees that there was an exception where human error caused a management decision on one single audit report to be issued untimely; in this instance, the decision itself was made timely but was not communicated in a timely manner. DHS disagrees that an isolated incident due to human error signifies a weakness in internal controls. This was not a systemic issue and therefore should not have been considered a significant deficiency in internal controls, and DHS should not have been included in this finding. Auditors’ Conclusion: The agency responses from PDOA, PDA, PDE, and DEP indicate agreement with the finding. DHS agrees that an error occurred resulting in untimely submission of one management decision, DHS disagrees that the error represents a significant deficiency. We acknowledge the error occurred due to an oversight and is not a systemic error, however, the error resulted in noncompliance with one of two audit reports that required timely management decisions. We will evaluate corrective action in the subsequent audit. The finding remains as stated. Questioned Costs: The amount of questioned costs cannot be determined.
Various Agencies Finding 2024 ¬– 015: ALN 10.565, 10.568, 10.569 – Food Distribution Cluster ALN 15.252 – Abandoned Mine Land Reclamation (AMLR) ALN 21.027 – COVID 19 – Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds ALN 84.425C – COVID 19 – Education Stabilization Fund – GEER Fund ALN 84.425D – COVID 19 – Education Stabilization Fund – ESSER Fund ALN 84.425R – COVID 19 – Education Stabilization Fund – CRRSA EANS Program ALN 84.425U – COVID 19 – Education Stabilization Fund – ARP ESSER ALN 84.425V – COVID 19 – Education Stabilization Fund – ARP EANS Program ALN 84.425W – COVID 19 – Education Stabilization Fund – ARP ESSER HCY ALN 93.044, 93.045, 93.053 – Aging Cluster (including COVID-19) ALN 93.558 – Temporary Assistance for Needy Families ALN 93.667 – Social Services Block Grant A Material Weakness and Material Noncompliance Exist in the Commonwealth’s Subrecipient Audit Resolution Process (A Similar Condition Was Noted in Prior Year Finding 2023-024) Federal Grant Number(s) and Year(s): 228PA100I1003 (6/13/2022 – 6/30/2025), 231PA445Q2204 (10/01/2022 – 9/30/2023), 231PA825Y8005 (10/01/2022 – 9/30/2023), 231PA825Y8105 (10/01/2022 – 9/30/2023), 241PA825Y8005 (10/01/2023 – 9/30/2024), 241PA825Y8105 (10/01/2023 – 9/30/2024), S18AF20004 (11/01/2017 – 10/31/2025), S19AF20004 (12/01/2018 – 11/30/2025), S21AF10015 (1/01/2021 – 12/31/2023), S22AF00017 (1/01/2022 – 12/31/2024), S23AF00002 (11/01/2022 – 10/31/2027), TN75GJE1S7G3 (3/03/2021 – 12/31/2024), S425W210039 (4/23/2021 – 9/30/2024), S425U210028 (3/24/2021– 9/30/2024), S425D210028 (1/05/2021 – 9/30/2024), S425C200013 (5/18/2020 – 4/01/2024), S425R210037 (3/13/2020 – 9/30/2024), S425V210037 (11/16/2021 – 9/30/2024), S425C210013 (3/13/2020 – 9/30/2024), 2101PACMC6 (4/01/2021 – 9/30/2024), 2101PAHDC6 (4/01/2021 – 9/30/2024), 2101PAPHC6 (4/01/2021 – 9/30/2024), 2101PASSC6 (4/01/2021 – 9/30/2024), 2201PAOASS (10/01/2021 – 9/30/2023), 2201PASTPH (1/01/2022 – 9/30/2024), 2301PAOACM (10/01/2022 – 9/30/2024), 2301PAOAHD (10/01/2022 – 9/30/2024), 2301PAOANS (10/01/2022 – 9/30/2024), 2301PAOASS (10/01/2022 – 9/30/2024), 2401PAOACM (10/01/2023 – 9/30/2025), 2401PAOAHD (10/01/2023 – 9/30/2025), 2401PAOANS (10/01/2023 – 9/30/2025), 2401PAOASS (10/01/2023 – 9/30/2025), 2101PATANF (10/01/2020 – 9/30/2021), 2201PATANF (10/01/2021 – 9/30/2022), 2301PATANF (10/01/2022 – 9/30/2023), 2401PATANF (10/01/2023 – 9/30/2024), 2301PASOSR (10/01/2022 – 9/30/2024), 2401PASOSR (10/01/2023 – 9/30/2025), 2301PATANF (10/01/2022 – 9/30/2024), 2401PATANF (10/01/2023 – 9/30/2025) Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance, Other Matters for Abandoned Mine Land Reclamation (AMLR), Temporary Assistance for Needy Families, Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, and Social Services Block Grant Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance, Material Noncompliance for Food Distribution Cluster, Education Stabilization Fund, and Aging Cluster Compliance Requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Condition: Under the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania's (Commonwealth) implementation of the Single Audit Act, review and resolution of subrecipient Single Audit reports is split into two stages. The Office of the Budget’s Bureau of Accounting and Financial Management (OB-BAFM) ensures the reports meet technical standards through a centralized desk review process. The various funding agencies in the Commonwealth are responsible for making a management decision on each finding within six months of the Federal Audit Clearinghouse’s (FAC) Acceptance date for audits subject to Uniform Guidance and to ensure appropriate corrective action is taken by the subrecipient (except for Uniform Guidance Finding 2024 ¬– 015: (continued) audits under U.S. Department of Labor programs which are permitted 12 months for management decisions in accordance with 2 CFR Section 2900.21). Each Commonwealth agency is also responsible for reviewing financial information in each audit report to determine whether the audit included all pass-through funding provided by the agency to ensure pass-through funds were subject to audit. Most agencies meet this requirement by performing Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) reconciliations. The agency is also required to adjust Commonwealth records, if necessary. Our fiscal year ended June 30, 2024 audit of the Commonwealth’s process for review and resolution of subrecipient Single Audits included an evaluation of the Commonwealth’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 subrecipient audit universe for audits due for submission to the FAC during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024. We also evaluated the Commonwealth’s review of 45 subrecipient audit reports with findings in major programs/clusters which were identified on the Commonwealth agencies’ tracking lists during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024 and required management decisions by Commonwealth agencies. Our testing disclosed the following audit exceptions regarding the Commonwealth agencies’ review of subrecipient audit reports: • Pennsylvania Department of Aging (PDOA): Our testing disclosed that PDOA did not have procedures in place to track audit reports including having an audit tracking list. The time period for making a management decision on findings was approximately 17.6 months to over 18 months after the FAC Acceptance date for two out of two audit reports with findings. There was also a delay in PDOA’s procedures to ensure the subrecipient SEFAs were accurate so that major programs were properly determined and subjected to audit. • Department of Agriculture (PDA): Our testing disclosed that PDA did not have procedures in place to track audit reports including having an audit tracking list. The time period for making a management decision on findings was approximately 8.7 months to over 16 months after the FAC Acceptance date for four out of four audit reports with findings. • Department of Education (PDE): The time period for making a management decision on findings was approximately 7.8 months to over 12 months after the FAC Acceptance date for seven out of 22 audit reports with findings. There were additional audit reports with findings listed on PDE’s audit tracking list where management decisions were not made timely. • Department of Environmental Protection (DEP): The time period for making a management decision on findings was approximately 11.6 months to over 12 months after the FAC Acceptance date for two out of two audit reports with findings. Our testing disclosed for the two late audit reports, DEP made management decisions timely. However, DEP did not notify the subrecipients of the management decisions within the required six month time period after the audit reports FAC Acceptance date. • Department of Human Services (DHS): The time period for making a management decision on findings was approximately 7.2 months after the FAC Acceptance date for one out of two audit reports with findings. Our testing disclosed for the one late audit report DHS made a management decision timely. However, DHS did not notify the subrecipient of the management decision within the required six month time period after the audit reports FAC Acceptance date. Criteria: 2 CFR §200.332, Requirements for pass-through entities, states in part: All pass-through entities must: (d) Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward, and that subaward performance goals are achieved. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: Finding 2024 ¬– 015: (continued) (2) Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity detected through audits, on-site reviews, and written confirmation from the subrecipient, highlighting the status of actions planned or taken to address Single Audit findings related to the particular subaward. (3) Issuing a management decision for applicable audit findings pertaining only to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity as required by §200.521 [Management decision]. (f) Verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F [Audit Requirements] of this part when it is expected that the subrecipient’s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in §200.501 [Audit requirements]. (g) Consider whether the results of the subrecipient’s audit, on-site review, or other monitoring indicate conditions that necessitate adjustments to the pass-through entity’s own records. (h) Consider taking enforcement action against noncompliant subrecipients as described in §200.339 [Remedies for noncompliance] of this part and in program regulations. In order to carry out these responsibilities properly, good internal control dictates that state pass-through agencies ensure subrecipient Single Audit SEFAs are representative of state payment records each year, and that the related federal programs have been properly subjected to Single Audit procedures. 2 CFR §200.512, Report submission, states in part: (a) General. (1) The audit must be completed and the data collection form described in paragraph (b) of this section and reporting package described in paragraph (c) of this section must be submitted within the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor’s report(s), or nine months after the end of the audit period. If the due date falls on a Saturday, Sunday, or Federal holiday, the reporting package is due the next business day. 2 CFR §200.521, Management decision, states in part: (a) General. The management decision must clearly state whether or not the finding is sustained, the reasons for the decision, and the expected auditee action to repay disallowed costs, make financial adjustments, or take other action. (d) Time requirements. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity responsible for issuing a management decision must do so within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. The auditee must initiate and proceed with corrective action as rapidly as possible and corrective action should begin no later than upon receipt of the audit report. 2 CFR §200.505, Sanctions, states: In cases of continued inability or unwillingness to have an audit conducted in accordance with this part, Federal agencies and pass-through entities must take appropriate action as provided in §200.339 [Remedies for noncompliance]. 2 CFR §200.339, Remedies for noncompliance, states in part: If a non-Federal entity fails to comply with the U.S. Constitution, Federal statutes, regulations or the terms and conditions of a Federal award, the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may impose additional conditions, as described in §200.208 [Specific conditions]. If the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity determines that noncompliance cannot be remedied by imposing additional conditions, the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may take one or more of the following actions, as appropriate in the circumstances. Finding 2024 ¬– 015: (continued) (a) Temporarily withhold cash payments pending correction of the deficiency by the non-Federal entity or more severe enforcement action by the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity. (b) Disallow (that is, deny both use of funds and any applicable matching credit for) all or part of the cost of the activity or action not in compliance. (c) Wholly or partly suspend or terminate the Federal award. (d) Initiate suspension or debarment proceedings as authorized under 2 CFR Part 180 and Federal awarding agency regulations (or in the case of a pass-through entity, recommend such a proceeding be initiated by a Federal awarding agency). (e) Withhold further Federal awards for the project or program. (f) Take other remedies that may be legally available. To ensure Commonwealth enforcement of federal regulations for subrecipient noncompliance with audit requirements, Commonwealth Management Directive 325.08, Amended – Remedies for Recipient Noncompliance with Audit Requirements, Section 5 related to policy, states in part: (a) Agencies must develop and implement remedial action that reflects the unique requirements of each program… (b) The remedial action should be implemented within six months from the date the first remedial action is initiated. At the end of the six-month period, the recipient should take the appropriate corrective action or the final stage of remedial action should be imposed on the recipient. Examples of remedial action include, but are not limited to: (1) Meeting or calling the recipient to explain the importance and benefits of the audit and audit resolution processes, emphasizing the value of the audit as an administrative tool and the Commonwealth’s reliance on an acceptable audit and prompt resolution as evidence of the recipient’s ability to properly administer the program. (2) Encouraging the entity to establish an audit committee or designate an individual as the single point of contact to: (a) Communicate regarding the audit. (b) Arrange for and oversee the audit. (c) Direct and monitor audit resolution. (3) Providing technical assistance to the recipient in devising and implementing an appropriate plan to remedy the noncompliance. (4) Withholding a portion of assistance payments until the noncompliance is resolved. (5) Withholding or disallowing overhead costs until the noncompliance is resolved. (6) Suspending the assistance agreement until the noncompliance is resolved. (7) Terminating the assistance agreement with the recipient and, if necessary, seeking alternative entities to administer the program. Finding 2024 ¬– 015: (continued) Management Directive 325.09, Amended – Processing Subrecipient Single Audits of Federal Pass-Through Funds, Section 7 related to procedures, states in part: c. Agencies. (2) Evaluate single audit report submissions received from BAFM to determine program purpose acceptability by verifying, at a minimum, that all agency-funded programs are properly included on the applicable financial schedules; that findings affecting the agency contain sufficient information to facilitate a management decision; and that the subrecipient has submitted an adequate corrective action plan. (5) Issue management decisions relative to audit findings and crosscutting findings assigned to the agency for resolution, as required by 2 CFR §200.521. If responsible for the resolution of crosscutting findings, notify the affected agency or agencies upon resolution of such findings. (6) Impose or coordinate the imposition of remedial action in accordance with 2 CFR Part 200.339 and Management Directive 325.08 Amended, Remedies for Recipient Noncompliance with Audit Requirements, when subrecipients fail to comply with the provisions of Subpart F. Management Directive 325.12, Amended – Standards for Enterprise Risk Management in Commonwealth Agencies, adopted the internal control framework outlined in the United States Government Accountability Office’s, Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government (Green Book). The Green Book states in part: Management should establish and operate monitoring activities to monitor the internal control system and evaluate the results. Management should remediate identified internal control deficiencies on a timely basis. Cause: One reason provided by Commonwealth management for untimely audit resolution in the various agencies, including making management decisions, approving corrective action, and performing procedures to ensure the accuracy of subrecipient SEFAs, was either a change in staff or a lack of staff to follow up and process subrecipient audit reports more timely. Effect: Since required management decisions were not made within six months to ensure appropriate corrective action was taken on audits received from subrecipients, the Commonwealth did not comply with federal regulations, and subrecipients were not made aware of acceptance or rejection of corrective action plans in a timely manner. Further, noncompliance may recur in future periods if control deficiencies are not corrected on a timely basis, and there is an increased risk of unallowable charges being made to federal programs if corrective action and recovery of questioned costs is not timely. Regarding the SEFA reviews or alternate procedures which are not being performed timely, there is an increased risk that subrecipients could be misspending and/or inappropriately tracking and reporting federal funds over multiple year periods, and these discrepancies may not be properly monitored, detected, and corrected by agency personnel on a timely basis as required. Recommendation: We recommend that the above weaknesses that cause untimely subrecipient Single Audit resolution, including untimely management decisions on findings, and untimely review of the SEFA or alternate procedures be corrected to ensure compliance with federal requirements and Commonwealth Management Directives, and to better ensure timelier subrecipient compliance with program requirements. PDOA Response: PDOA agrees with the finding. PDA Response: PDA agrees with the finding. PDE Response: PDE agrees with the finding. DEP Response: DEP agrees with the finding. Finding 2024 ¬– 015: (continued) DHS Response: DHS agrees that there was an exception where human error caused a management decision on one single audit report to be issued untimely; in this instance, the decision itself was made timely but was not communicated in a timely manner. DHS disagrees that an isolated incident due to human error signifies a weakness in internal controls. This was not a systemic issue and therefore should not have been considered a significant deficiency in internal controls, and DHS should not have been included in this finding. Auditors’ Conclusion: The agency responses from PDOA, PDA, PDE, and DEP indicate agreement with the finding. DHS agrees that an error occurred resulting in untimely submission of one management decision, DHS disagrees that the error represents a significant deficiency. We acknowledge the error occurred due to an oversight and is not a systemic error, however, the error resulted in noncompliance with one of two audit reports that required timely management decisions. We will evaluate corrective action in the subsequent audit. The finding remains as stated. Questioned Costs: The amount of questioned costs cannot be determined.