Finding 2022-001 Federal Agency: Various Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Year: Programs active between July 1, 2021 ? June 30, 2022 Compliance requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Finding Type: Significant Deficiency Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must: Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward, and achieves performance goals. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: ? Reviewing financial and programmatic (performance and special reports) required by the pass-through entity (PTE). ? Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means. ? Issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE as required by 2 CFR section 200.521. ? The pass-through entity is responsible for resolving audit findings specifically related to the subaward and not responsible for resolving crosscutting findings. If a subrecipient has a current Single Audit report posted in the Federal Audit Clearinghouse and has not otherwise been excluded from receipt of Federal funding (e.g., has been debarred or suspended), the pass-through entity may rely on the subrecipient?s cognizant audit agency or cognizant oversight agency to perform audit follow-up and make management decisions related to cross-cutting findings in accordance with section 2 CFR 200.513(a)(3)(vii). Such reliance does not eliminate the responsibility of the pass-through entity to issue subawards that conform to agency and award-specific requirements, to manage risk through ongoing subaward monitoring, and to monitor the status of the findings that are specifically related to the subaward. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of 2 CFR 200.500 when it is expected that the subrecipient?s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in 2 CFR 200.501. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.521(c) and (d): the pass-through entity must be responsible for issuing a management decision for audit findings that relate to Federal awards it makes to subrecipients. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity responsible for issuing a management decision must do so within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the Federal Audit Clearinghouse (FAC). In accordance with 2 CFR 200.501(h), since 2 CFR Part 200 does not make Subpart F applicable to for-profit subrecipients, the PTE is responsible for establishing requirements, as necessary, to ensure compliance by for-profit subrecipients for the subaward. The agreement with the for-profit subrecipient must describe applicable compliance requirements and the for-profit subrecipient?s compliance responsibility. Methods to ensure compliance for federal awards made to for-profit subrecipients may include pre-award audits, monitoring during the agreement, and post-award audits. Condition, including Perspective Lehigh University passed through $3,277,289 to its subrecipients in the research and development cluster (R&D cluster), which represents approximately 10% of total R&D cluster expenditures for the year ended June 30, 2022. As a pass-through entity, Lehigh University?s Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) is responsible for monitoring the activities and compliance of its subrecipients. Monitoring includes reviewing the compliance audit reports from its subrecipients as they become available through the federal audit clearinghouse to ascertain the existence of non-compliance and appropriate follow-up with the subrecipient to ensure timely and appropriate corrective action is taken to remediate the finding(s). Our procedures performed determined that the Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) did not complete the review of their compliance reports within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Cause and Effect The ORSP lost two full time personnel in summer of 2020, one of whom was responsible for the review of the subrecipient compliance reports and issuing the management decision for any audit findings. That position was not filled until the December 2021 and no one else in ORSP completed these reviews during this timeframe. The lack of monitoring subrecipients timely could result in continuing to pass-through federal monies to a subrecipient who is not in compliance with federal compliance. Noncompliance by a subrecipient that is not identified and addressed timely could jeopardize the University?s receipt of future federal awards and public reputation. Questioned Costs No questioned costs were identified. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding Yes, finding 2021-001 Recommendation We recommend that Lehigh University strengthen its processes and controls to ensure the review of its subrecipient?s compliance reports is completed within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Views of Responsible Officials Lehigh University accepts this finding. The review of fiscal year 2022 has been conducted and is complete for the review of those institutions who have submitted their audit reports to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse.
Finding 2022-001 Federal Agency: Various Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Year: Programs active between July 1, 2021 ? June 30, 2022 Compliance requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Finding Type: Significant Deficiency Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must: Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward, and achieves performance goals. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: ? Reviewing financial and programmatic (performance and special reports) required by the pass-through entity (PTE). ? Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means. ? Issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE as required by 2 CFR section 200.521. ? The pass-through entity is responsible for resolving audit findings specifically related to the subaward and not responsible for resolving crosscutting findings. If a subrecipient has a current Single Audit report posted in the Federal Audit Clearinghouse and has not otherwise been excluded from receipt of Federal funding (e.g., has been debarred or suspended), the pass-through entity may rely on the subrecipient?s cognizant audit agency or cognizant oversight agency to perform audit follow-up and make management decisions related to cross-cutting findings in accordance with section 2 CFR 200.513(a)(3)(vii). Such reliance does not eliminate the responsibility of the pass-through entity to issue subawards that conform to agency and award-specific requirements, to manage risk through ongoing subaward monitoring, and to monitor the status of the findings that are specifically related to the subaward. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of 2 CFR 200.500 when it is expected that the subrecipient?s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in 2 CFR 200.501. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.521(c) and (d): the pass-through entity must be responsible for issuing a management decision for audit findings that relate to Federal awards it makes to subrecipients. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity responsible for issuing a management decision must do so within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the Federal Audit Clearinghouse (FAC). In accordance with 2 CFR 200.501(h), since 2 CFR Part 200 does not make Subpart F applicable to for-profit subrecipients, the PTE is responsible for establishing requirements, as necessary, to ensure compliance by for-profit subrecipients for the subaward. The agreement with the for-profit subrecipient must describe applicable compliance requirements and the for-profit subrecipient?s compliance responsibility. Methods to ensure compliance for federal awards made to for-profit subrecipients may include pre-award audits, monitoring during the agreement, and post-award audits. Condition, including Perspective Lehigh University passed through $3,277,289 to its subrecipients in the research and development cluster (R&D cluster), which represents approximately 10% of total R&D cluster expenditures for the year ended June 30, 2022. As a pass-through entity, Lehigh University?s Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) is responsible for monitoring the activities and compliance of its subrecipients. Monitoring includes reviewing the compliance audit reports from its subrecipients as they become available through the federal audit clearinghouse to ascertain the existence of non-compliance and appropriate follow-up with the subrecipient to ensure timely and appropriate corrective action is taken to remediate the finding(s). Our procedures performed determined that the Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) did not complete the review of their compliance reports within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Cause and Effect The ORSP lost two full time personnel in summer of 2020, one of whom was responsible for the review of the subrecipient compliance reports and issuing the management decision for any audit findings. That position was not filled until the December 2021 and no one else in ORSP completed these reviews during this timeframe. The lack of monitoring subrecipients timely could result in continuing to pass-through federal monies to a subrecipient who is not in compliance with federal compliance. Noncompliance by a subrecipient that is not identified and addressed timely could jeopardize the University?s receipt of future federal awards and public reputation. Questioned Costs No questioned costs were identified. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding Yes, finding 2021-001 Recommendation We recommend that Lehigh University strengthen its processes and controls to ensure the review of its subrecipient?s compliance reports is completed within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Views of Responsible Officials Lehigh University accepts this finding. The review of fiscal year 2022 has been conducted and is complete for the review of those institutions who have submitted their audit reports to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse.
Finding 2022-001 Federal Agency: Various Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Year: Programs active between July 1, 2021 ? June 30, 2022 Compliance requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Finding Type: Significant Deficiency Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must: Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward, and achieves performance goals. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: ? Reviewing financial and programmatic (performance and special reports) required by the pass-through entity (PTE). ? Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means. ? Issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE as required by 2 CFR section 200.521. ? The pass-through entity is responsible for resolving audit findings specifically related to the subaward and not responsible for resolving crosscutting findings. If a subrecipient has a current Single Audit report posted in the Federal Audit Clearinghouse and has not otherwise been excluded from receipt of Federal funding (e.g., has been debarred or suspended), the pass-through entity may rely on the subrecipient?s cognizant audit agency or cognizant oversight agency to perform audit follow-up and make management decisions related to cross-cutting findings in accordance with section 2 CFR 200.513(a)(3)(vii). Such reliance does not eliminate the responsibility of the pass-through entity to issue subawards that conform to agency and award-specific requirements, to manage risk through ongoing subaward monitoring, and to monitor the status of the findings that are specifically related to the subaward. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of 2 CFR 200.500 when it is expected that the subrecipient?s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in 2 CFR 200.501. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.521(c) and (d): the pass-through entity must be responsible for issuing a management decision for audit findings that relate to Federal awards it makes to subrecipients. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity responsible for issuing a management decision must do so within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the Federal Audit Clearinghouse (FAC). In accordance with 2 CFR 200.501(h), since 2 CFR Part 200 does not make Subpart F applicable to for-profit subrecipients, the PTE is responsible for establishing requirements, as necessary, to ensure compliance by for-profit subrecipients for the subaward. The agreement with the for-profit subrecipient must describe applicable compliance requirements and the for-profit subrecipient?s compliance responsibility. Methods to ensure compliance for federal awards made to for-profit subrecipients may include pre-award audits, monitoring during the agreement, and post-award audits. Condition, including Perspective Lehigh University passed through $3,277,289 to its subrecipients in the research and development cluster (R&D cluster), which represents approximately 10% of total R&D cluster expenditures for the year ended June 30, 2022. As a pass-through entity, Lehigh University?s Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) is responsible for monitoring the activities and compliance of its subrecipients. Monitoring includes reviewing the compliance audit reports from its subrecipients as they become available through the federal audit clearinghouse to ascertain the existence of non-compliance and appropriate follow-up with the subrecipient to ensure timely and appropriate corrective action is taken to remediate the finding(s). Our procedures performed determined that the Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) did not complete the review of their compliance reports within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Cause and Effect The ORSP lost two full time personnel in summer of 2020, one of whom was responsible for the review of the subrecipient compliance reports and issuing the management decision for any audit findings. That position was not filled until the December 2021 and no one else in ORSP completed these reviews during this timeframe. The lack of monitoring subrecipients timely could result in continuing to pass-through federal monies to a subrecipient who is not in compliance with federal compliance. Noncompliance by a subrecipient that is not identified and addressed timely could jeopardize the University?s receipt of future federal awards and public reputation. Questioned Costs No questioned costs were identified. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding Yes, finding 2021-001 Recommendation We recommend that Lehigh University strengthen its processes and controls to ensure the review of its subrecipient?s compliance reports is completed within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Views of Responsible Officials Lehigh University accepts this finding. The review of fiscal year 2022 has been conducted and is complete for the review of those institutions who have submitted their audit reports to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse.
Finding 2022-001 Federal Agency: Various Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Year: Programs active between July 1, 2021 ? June 30, 2022 Compliance requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Finding Type: Significant Deficiency Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must: Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward, and achieves performance goals. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: ? Reviewing financial and programmatic (performance and special reports) required by the pass-through entity (PTE). ? Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means. ? Issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE as required by 2 CFR section 200.521. ? The pass-through entity is responsible for resolving audit findings specifically related to the subaward and not responsible for resolving crosscutting findings. If a subrecipient has a current Single Audit report posted in the Federal Audit Clearinghouse and has not otherwise been excluded from receipt of Federal funding (e.g., has been debarred or suspended), the pass-through entity may rely on the subrecipient?s cognizant audit agency or cognizant oversight agency to perform audit follow-up and make management decisions related to cross-cutting findings in accordance with section 2 CFR 200.513(a)(3)(vii). Such reliance does not eliminate the responsibility of the pass-through entity to issue subawards that conform to agency and award-specific requirements, to manage risk through ongoing subaward monitoring, and to monitor the status of the findings that are specifically related to the subaward. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of 2 CFR 200.500 when it is expected that the subrecipient?s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in 2 CFR 200.501. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.521(c) and (d): the pass-through entity must be responsible for issuing a management decision for audit findings that relate to Federal awards it makes to subrecipients. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity responsible for issuing a management decision must do so within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the Federal Audit Clearinghouse (FAC). In accordance with 2 CFR 200.501(h), since 2 CFR Part 200 does not make Subpart F applicable to for-profit subrecipients, the PTE is responsible for establishing requirements, as necessary, to ensure compliance by for-profit subrecipients for the subaward. The agreement with the for-profit subrecipient must describe applicable compliance requirements and the for-profit subrecipient?s compliance responsibility. Methods to ensure compliance for federal awards made to for-profit subrecipients may include pre-award audits, monitoring during the agreement, and post-award audits. Condition, including Perspective Lehigh University passed through $3,277,289 to its subrecipients in the research and development cluster (R&D cluster), which represents approximately 10% of total R&D cluster expenditures for the year ended June 30, 2022. As a pass-through entity, Lehigh University?s Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) is responsible for monitoring the activities and compliance of its subrecipients. Monitoring includes reviewing the compliance audit reports from its subrecipients as they become available through the federal audit clearinghouse to ascertain the existence of non-compliance and appropriate follow-up with the subrecipient to ensure timely and appropriate corrective action is taken to remediate the finding(s). Our procedures performed determined that the Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) did not complete the review of their compliance reports within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Cause and Effect The ORSP lost two full time personnel in summer of 2020, one of whom was responsible for the review of the subrecipient compliance reports and issuing the management decision for any audit findings. That position was not filled until the December 2021 and no one else in ORSP completed these reviews during this timeframe. The lack of monitoring subrecipients timely could result in continuing to pass-through federal monies to a subrecipient who is not in compliance with federal compliance. Noncompliance by a subrecipient that is not identified and addressed timely could jeopardize the University?s receipt of future federal awards and public reputation. Questioned Costs No questioned costs were identified. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding Yes, finding 2021-001 Recommendation We recommend that Lehigh University strengthen its processes and controls to ensure the review of its subrecipient?s compliance reports is completed within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Views of Responsible Officials Lehigh University accepts this finding. The review of fiscal year 2022 has been conducted and is complete for the review of those institutions who have submitted their audit reports to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse.
Finding 2022-001 Federal Agency: Various Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Year: Programs active between July 1, 2021 ? June 30, 2022 Compliance requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Finding Type: Significant Deficiency Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must: Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward, and achieves performance goals. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: ? Reviewing financial and programmatic (performance and special reports) required by the pass-through entity (PTE). ? Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means. ? Issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE as required by 2 CFR section 200.521. ? The pass-through entity is responsible for resolving audit findings specifically related to the subaward and not responsible for resolving crosscutting findings. If a subrecipient has a current Single Audit report posted in the Federal Audit Clearinghouse and has not otherwise been excluded from receipt of Federal funding (e.g., has been debarred or suspended), the pass-through entity may rely on the subrecipient?s cognizant audit agency or cognizant oversight agency to perform audit follow-up and make management decisions related to cross-cutting findings in accordance with section 2 CFR 200.513(a)(3)(vii). Such reliance does not eliminate the responsibility of the pass-through entity to issue subawards that conform to agency and award-specific requirements, to manage risk through ongoing subaward monitoring, and to monitor the status of the findings that are specifically related to the subaward. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of 2 CFR 200.500 when it is expected that the subrecipient?s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in 2 CFR 200.501. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.521(c) and (d): the pass-through entity must be responsible for issuing a management decision for audit findings that relate to Federal awards it makes to subrecipients. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity responsible for issuing a management decision must do so within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the Federal Audit Clearinghouse (FAC). In accordance with 2 CFR 200.501(h), since 2 CFR Part 200 does not make Subpart F applicable to for-profit subrecipients, the PTE is responsible for establishing requirements, as necessary, to ensure compliance by for-profit subrecipients for the subaward. The agreement with the for-profit subrecipient must describe applicable compliance requirements and the for-profit subrecipient?s compliance responsibility. Methods to ensure compliance for federal awards made to for-profit subrecipients may include pre-award audits, monitoring during the agreement, and post-award audits. Condition, including Perspective Lehigh University passed through $3,277,289 to its subrecipients in the research and development cluster (R&D cluster), which represents approximately 10% of total R&D cluster expenditures for the year ended June 30, 2022. As a pass-through entity, Lehigh University?s Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) is responsible for monitoring the activities and compliance of its subrecipients. Monitoring includes reviewing the compliance audit reports from its subrecipients as they become available through the federal audit clearinghouse to ascertain the existence of non-compliance and appropriate follow-up with the subrecipient to ensure timely and appropriate corrective action is taken to remediate the finding(s). Our procedures performed determined that the Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) did not complete the review of their compliance reports within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Cause and Effect The ORSP lost two full time personnel in summer of 2020, one of whom was responsible for the review of the subrecipient compliance reports and issuing the management decision for any audit findings. That position was not filled until the December 2021 and no one else in ORSP completed these reviews during this timeframe. The lack of monitoring subrecipients timely could result in continuing to pass-through federal monies to a subrecipient who is not in compliance with federal compliance. Noncompliance by a subrecipient that is not identified and addressed timely could jeopardize the University?s receipt of future federal awards and public reputation. Questioned Costs No questioned costs were identified. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding Yes, finding 2021-001 Recommendation We recommend that Lehigh University strengthen its processes and controls to ensure the review of its subrecipient?s compliance reports is completed within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Views of Responsible Officials Lehigh University accepts this finding. The review of fiscal year 2022 has been conducted and is complete for the review of those institutions who have submitted their audit reports to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse.
Finding 2022-001 Federal Agency: Various Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Year: Programs active between July 1, 2021 ? June 30, 2022 Compliance requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Finding Type: Significant Deficiency Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must: Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward, and achieves performance goals. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: ? Reviewing financial and programmatic (performance and special reports) required by the pass-through entity (PTE). ? Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means. ? Issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE as required by 2 CFR section 200.521. ? The pass-through entity is responsible for resolving audit findings specifically related to the subaward and not responsible for resolving crosscutting findings. If a subrecipient has a current Single Audit report posted in the Federal Audit Clearinghouse and has not otherwise been excluded from receipt of Federal funding (e.g., has been debarred or suspended), the pass-through entity may rely on the subrecipient?s cognizant audit agency or cognizant oversight agency to perform audit follow-up and make management decisions related to cross-cutting findings in accordance with section 2 CFR 200.513(a)(3)(vii). Such reliance does not eliminate the responsibility of the pass-through entity to issue subawards that conform to agency and award-specific requirements, to manage risk through ongoing subaward monitoring, and to monitor the status of the findings that are specifically related to the subaward. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of 2 CFR 200.500 when it is expected that the subrecipient?s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in 2 CFR 200.501. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.521(c) and (d): the pass-through entity must be responsible for issuing a management decision for audit findings that relate to Federal awards it makes to subrecipients. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity responsible for issuing a management decision must do so within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the Federal Audit Clearinghouse (FAC). In accordance with 2 CFR 200.501(h), since 2 CFR Part 200 does not make Subpart F applicable to for-profit subrecipients, the PTE is responsible for establishing requirements, as necessary, to ensure compliance by for-profit subrecipients for the subaward. The agreement with the for-profit subrecipient must describe applicable compliance requirements and the for-profit subrecipient?s compliance responsibility. Methods to ensure compliance for federal awards made to for-profit subrecipients may include pre-award audits, monitoring during the agreement, and post-award audits. Condition, including Perspective Lehigh University passed through $3,277,289 to its subrecipients in the research and development cluster (R&D cluster), which represents approximately 10% of total R&D cluster expenditures for the year ended June 30, 2022. As a pass-through entity, Lehigh University?s Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) is responsible for monitoring the activities and compliance of its subrecipients. Monitoring includes reviewing the compliance audit reports from its subrecipients as they become available through the federal audit clearinghouse to ascertain the existence of non-compliance and appropriate follow-up with the subrecipient to ensure timely and appropriate corrective action is taken to remediate the finding(s). Our procedures performed determined that the Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) did not complete the review of their compliance reports within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Cause and Effect The ORSP lost two full time personnel in summer of 2020, one of whom was responsible for the review of the subrecipient compliance reports and issuing the management decision for any audit findings. That position was not filled until the December 2021 and no one else in ORSP completed these reviews during this timeframe. The lack of monitoring subrecipients timely could result in continuing to pass-through federal monies to a subrecipient who is not in compliance with federal compliance. Noncompliance by a subrecipient that is not identified and addressed timely could jeopardize the University?s receipt of future federal awards and public reputation. Questioned Costs No questioned costs were identified. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding Yes, finding 2021-001 Recommendation We recommend that Lehigh University strengthen its processes and controls to ensure the review of its subrecipient?s compliance reports is completed within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Views of Responsible Officials Lehigh University accepts this finding. The review of fiscal year 2022 has been conducted and is complete for the review of those institutions who have submitted their audit reports to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse.
Finding 2022-001 Federal Agency: Various Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Year: Programs active between July 1, 2021 ? June 30, 2022 Compliance requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Finding Type: Significant Deficiency Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must: Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward, and achieves performance goals. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: ? Reviewing financial and programmatic (performance and special reports) required by the pass-through entity (PTE). ? Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means. ? Issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE as required by 2 CFR section 200.521. ? The pass-through entity is responsible for resolving audit findings specifically related to the subaward and not responsible for resolving crosscutting findings. If a subrecipient has a current Single Audit report posted in the Federal Audit Clearinghouse and has not otherwise been excluded from receipt of Federal funding (e.g., has been debarred or suspended), the pass-through entity may rely on the subrecipient?s cognizant audit agency or cognizant oversight agency to perform audit follow-up and make management decisions related to cross-cutting findings in accordance with section 2 CFR 200.513(a)(3)(vii). Such reliance does not eliminate the responsibility of the pass-through entity to issue subawards that conform to agency and award-specific requirements, to manage risk through ongoing subaward monitoring, and to monitor the status of the findings that are specifically related to the subaward. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of 2 CFR 200.500 when it is expected that the subrecipient?s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in 2 CFR 200.501. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.521(c) and (d): the pass-through entity must be responsible for issuing a management decision for audit findings that relate to Federal awards it makes to subrecipients. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity responsible for issuing a management decision must do so within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the Federal Audit Clearinghouse (FAC). In accordance with 2 CFR 200.501(h), since 2 CFR Part 200 does not make Subpart F applicable to for-profit subrecipients, the PTE is responsible for establishing requirements, as necessary, to ensure compliance by for-profit subrecipients for the subaward. The agreement with the for-profit subrecipient must describe applicable compliance requirements and the for-profit subrecipient?s compliance responsibility. Methods to ensure compliance for federal awards made to for-profit subrecipients may include pre-award audits, monitoring during the agreement, and post-award audits. Condition, including Perspective Lehigh University passed through $3,277,289 to its subrecipients in the research and development cluster (R&D cluster), which represents approximately 10% of total R&D cluster expenditures for the year ended June 30, 2022. As a pass-through entity, Lehigh University?s Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) is responsible for monitoring the activities and compliance of its subrecipients. Monitoring includes reviewing the compliance audit reports from its subrecipients as they become available through the federal audit clearinghouse to ascertain the existence of non-compliance and appropriate follow-up with the subrecipient to ensure timely and appropriate corrective action is taken to remediate the finding(s). Our procedures performed determined that the Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) did not complete the review of their compliance reports within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Cause and Effect The ORSP lost two full time personnel in summer of 2020, one of whom was responsible for the review of the subrecipient compliance reports and issuing the management decision for any audit findings. That position was not filled until the December 2021 and no one else in ORSP completed these reviews during this timeframe. The lack of monitoring subrecipients timely could result in continuing to pass-through federal monies to a subrecipient who is not in compliance with federal compliance. Noncompliance by a subrecipient that is not identified and addressed timely could jeopardize the University?s receipt of future federal awards and public reputation. Questioned Costs No questioned costs were identified. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding Yes, finding 2021-001 Recommendation We recommend that Lehigh University strengthen its processes and controls to ensure the review of its subrecipient?s compliance reports is completed within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Views of Responsible Officials Lehigh University accepts this finding. The review of fiscal year 2022 has been conducted and is complete for the review of those institutions who have submitted their audit reports to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse.
Finding 2022-001 Federal Agency: Various Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Year: Programs active between July 1, 2021 ? June 30, 2022 Compliance requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Finding Type: Significant Deficiency Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must: Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward, and achieves performance goals. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: ? Reviewing financial and programmatic (performance and special reports) required by the pass-through entity (PTE). ? Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means. ? Issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE as required by 2 CFR section 200.521. ? The pass-through entity is responsible for resolving audit findings specifically related to the subaward and not responsible for resolving crosscutting findings. If a subrecipient has a current Single Audit report posted in the Federal Audit Clearinghouse and has not otherwise been excluded from receipt of Federal funding (e.g., has been debarred or suspended), the pass-through entity may rely on the subrecipient?s cognizant audit agency or cognizant oversight agency to perform audit follow-up and make management decisions related to cross-cutting findings in accordance with section 2 CFR 200.513(a)(3)(vii). Such reliance does not eliminate the responsibility of the pass-through entity to issue subawards that conform to agency and award-specific requirements, to manage risk through ongoing subaward monitoring, and to monitor the status of the findings that are specifically related to the subaward. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of 2 CFR 200.500 when it is expected that the subrecipient?s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in 2 CFR 200.501. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.521(c) and (d): the pass-through entity must be responsible for issuing a management decision for audit findings that relate to Federal awards it makes to subrecipients. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity responsible for issuing a management decision must do so within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the Federal Audit Clearinghouse (FAC). In accordance with 2 CFR 200.501(h), since 2 CFR Part 200 does not make Subpart F applicable to for-profit subrecipients, the PTE is responsible for establishing requirements, as necessary, to ensure compliance by for-profit subrecipients for the subaward. The agreement with the for-profit subrecipient must describe applicable compliance requirements and the for-profit subrecipient?s compliance responsibility. Methods to ensure compliance for federal awards made to for-profit subrecipients may include pre-award audits, monitoring during the agreement, and post-award audits. Condition, including Perspective Lehigh University passed through $3,277,289 to its subrecipients in the research and development cluster (R&D cluster), which represents approximately 10% of total R&D cluster expenditures for the year ended June 30, 2022. As a pass-through entity, Lehigh University?s Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) is responsible for monitoring the activities and compliance of its subrecipients. Monitoring includes reviewing the compliance audit reports from its subrecipients as they become available through the federal audit clearinghouse to ascertain the existence of non-compliance and appropriate follow-up with the subrecipient to ensure timely and appropriate corrective action is taken to remediate the finding(s). Our procedures performed determined that the Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) did not complete the review of their compliance reports within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Cause and Effect The ORSP lost two full time personnel in summer of 2020, one of whom was responsible for the review of the subrecipient compliance reports and issuing the management decision for any audit findings. That position was not filled until the December 2021 and no one else in ORSP completed these reviews during this timeframe. The lack of monitoring subrecipients timely could result in continuing to pass-through federal monies to a subrecipient who is not in compliance with federal compliance. Noncompliance by a subrecipient that is not identified and addressed timely could jeopardize the University?s receipt of future federal awards and public reputation. Questioned Costs No questioned costs were identified. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding Yes, finding 2021-001 Recommendation We recommend that Lehigh University strengthen its processes and controls to ensure the review of its subrecipient?s compliance reports is completed within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Views of Responsible Officials Lehigh University accepts this finding. The review of fiscal year 2022 has been conducted and is complete for the review of those institutions who have submitted their audit reports to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse.
Finding 2022-001 Federal Agency: Various Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Year: Programs active between July 1, 2021 ? June 30, 2022 Compliance requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Finding Type: Significant Deficiency Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must: Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward, and achieves performance goals. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: ? Reviewing financial and programmatic (performance and special reports) required by the pass-through entity (PTE). ? Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means. ? Issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE as required by 2 CFR section 200.521. ? The pass-through entity is responsible for resolving audit findings specifically related to the subaward and not responsible for resolving crosscutting findings. If a subrecipient has a current Single Audit report posted in the Federal Audit Clearinghouse and has not otherwise been excluded from receipt of Federal funding (e.g., has been debarred or suspended), the pass-through entity may rely on the subrecipient?s cognizant audit agency or cognizant oversight agency to perform audit follow-up and make management decisions related to cross-cutting findings in accordance with section 2 CFR 200.513(a)(3)(vii). Such reliance does not eliminate the responsibility of the pass-through entity to issue subawards that conform to agency and award-specific requirements, to manage risk through ongoing subaward monitoring, and to monitor the status of the findings that are specifically related to the subaward. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of 2 CFR 200.500 when it is expected that the subrecipient?s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in 2 CFR 200.501. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.521(c) and (d): the pass-through entity must be responsible for issuing a management decision for audit findings that relate to Federal awards it makes to subrecipients. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity responsible for issuing a management decision must do so within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the Federal Audit Clearinghouse (FAC). In accordance with 2 CFR 200.501(h), since 2 CFR Part 200 does not make Subpart F applicable to for-profit subrecipients, the PTE is responsible for establishing requirements, as necessary, to ensure compliance by for-profit subrecipients for the subaward. The agreement with the for-profit subrecipient must describe applicable compliance requirements and the for-profit subrecipient?s compliance responsibility. Methods to ensure compliance for federal awards made to for-profit subrecipients may include pre-award audits, monitoring during the agreement, and post-award audits. Condition, including Perspective Lehigh University passed through $3,277,289 to its subrecipients in the research and development cluster (R&D cluster), which represents approximately 10% of total R&D cluster expenditures for the year ended June 30, 2022. As a pass-through entity, Lehigh University?s Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) is responsible for monitoring the activities and compliance of its subrecipients. Monitoring includes reviewing the compliance audit reports from its subrecipients as they become available through the federal audit clearinghouse to ascertain the existence of non-compliance and appropriate follow-up with the subrecipient to ensure timely and appropriate corrective action is taken to remediate the finding(s). Our procedures performed determined that the Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) did not complete the review of their compliance reports within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Cause and Effect The ORSP lost two full time personnel in summer of 2020, one of whom was responsible for the review of the subrecipient compliance reports and issuing the management decision for any audit findings. That position was not filled until the December 2021 and no one else in ORSP completed these reviews during this timeframe. The lack of monitoring subrecipients timely could result in continuing to pass-through federal monies to a subrecipient who is not in compliance with federal compliance. Noncompliance by a subrecipient that is not identified and addressed timely could jeopardize the University?s receipt of future federal awards and public reputation. Questioned Costs No questioned costs were identified. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding Yes, finding 2021-001 Recommendation We recommend that Lehigh University strengthen its processes and controls to ensure the review of its subrecipient?s compliance reports is completed within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Views of Responsible Officials Lehigh University accepts this finding. The review of fiscal year 2022 has been conducted and is complete for the review of those institutions who have submitted their audit reports to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse.
Finding 2022-001 Federal Agency: Various Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Year: Programs active between July 1, 2021 ? June 30, 2022 Compliance requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Finding Type: Significant Deficiency Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must: Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward, and achieves performance goals. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: ? Reviewing financial and programmatic (performance and special reports) required by the pass-through entity (PTE). ? Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means. ? Issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE as required by 2 CFR section 200.521. ? The pass-through entity is responsible for resolving audit findings specifically related to the subaward and not responsible for resolving crosscutting findings. If a subrecipient has a current Single Audit report posted in the Federal Audit Clearinghouse and has not otherwise been excluded from receipt of Federal funding (e.g., has been debarred or suspended), the pass-through entity may rely on the subrecipient?s cognizant audit agency or cognizant oversight agency to perform audit follow-up and make management decisions related to cross-cutting findings in accordance with section 2 CFR 200.513(a)(3)(vii). Such reliance does not eliminate the responsibility of the pass-through entity to issue subawards that conform to agency and award-specific requirements, to manage risk through ongoing subaward monitoring, and to monitor the status of the findings that are specifically related to the subaward. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of 2 CFR 200.500 when it is expected that the subrecipient?s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in 2 CFR 200.501. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.521(c) and (d): the pass-through entity must be responsible for issuing a management decision for audit findings that relate to Federal awards it makes to subrecipients. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity responsible for issuing a management decision must do so within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the Federal Audit Clearinghouse (FAC). In accordance with 2 CFR 200.501(h), since 2 CFR Part 200 does not make Subpart F applicable to for-profit subrecipients, the PTE is responsible for establishing requirements, as necessary, to ensure compliance by for-profit subrecipients for the subaward. The agreement with the for-profit subrecipient must describe applicable compliance requirements and the for-profit subrecipient?s compliance responsibility. Methods to ensure compliance for federal awards made to for-profit subrecipients may include pre-award audits, monitoring during the agreement, and post-award audits. Condition, including Perspective Lehigh University passed through $3,277,289 to its subrecipients in the research and development cluster (R&D cluster), which represents approximately 10% of total R&D cluster expenditures for the year ended June 30, 2022. As a pass-through entity, Lehigh University?s Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) is responsible for monitoring the activities and compliance of its subrecipients. Monitoring includes reviewing the compliance audit reports from its subrecipients as they become available through the federal audit clearinghouse to ascertain the existence of non-compliance and appropriate follow-up with the subrecipient to ensure timely and appropriate corrective action is taken to remediate the finding(s). Our procedures performed determined that the Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) did not complete the review of their compliance reports within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Cause and Effect The ORSP lost two full time personnel in summer of 2020, one of whom was responsible for the review of the subrecipient compliance reports and issuing the management decision for any audit findings. That position was not filled until the December 2021 and no one else in ORSP completed these reviews during this timeframe. The lack of monitoring subrecipients timely could result in continuing to pass-through federal monies to a subrecipient who is not in compliance with federal compliance. Noncompliance by a subrecipient that is not identified and addressed timely could jeopardize the University?s receipt of future federal awards and public reputation. Questioned Costs No questioned costs were identified. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding Yes, finding 2021-001 Recommendation We recommend that Lehigh University strengthen its processes and controls to ensure the review of its subrecipient?s compliance reports is completed within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Views of Responsible Officials Lehigh University accepts this finding. The review of fiscal year 2022 has been conducted and is complete for the review of those institutions who have submitted their audit reports to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse.
Finding 2022-001 Federal Agency: Various Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Year: Programs active between July 1, 2021 ? June 30, 2022 Compliance requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Finding Type: Significant Deficiency Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must: Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward, and achieves performance goals. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: ? Reviewing financial and programmatic (performance and special reports) required by the pass-through entity (PTE). ? Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means. ? Issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE as required by 2 CFR section 200.521. ? The pass-through entity is responsible for resolving audit findings specifically related to the subaward and not responsible for resolving crosscutting findings. If a subrecipient has a current Single Audit report posted in the Federal Audit Clearinghouse and has not otherwise been excluded from receipt of Federal funding (e.g., has been debarred or suspended), the pass-through entity may rely on the subrecipient?s cognizant audit agency or cognizant oversight agency to perform audit follow-up and make management decisions related to cross-cutting findings in accordance with section 2 CFR 200.513(a)(3)(vii). Such reliance does not eliminate the responsibility of the pass-through entity to issue subawards that conform to agency and award-specific requirements, to manage risk through ongoing subaward monitoring, and to monitor the status of the findings that are specifically related to the subaward. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of 2 CFR 200.500 when it is expected that the subrecipient?s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in 2 CFR 200.501. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.521(c) and (d): the pass-through entity must be responsible for issuing a management decision for audit findings that relate to Federal awards it makes to subrecipients. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity responsible for issuing a management decision must do so within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the Federal Audit Clearinghouse (FAC). In accordance with 2 CFR 200.501(h), since 2 CFR Part 200 does not make Subpart F applicable to for-profit subrecipients, the PTE is responsible for establishing requirements, as necessary, to ensure compliance by for-profit subrecipients for the subaward. The agreement with the for-profit subrecipient must describe applicable compliance requirements and the for-profit subrecipient?s compliance responsibility. Methods to ensure compliance for federal awards made to for-profit subrecipients may include pre-award audits, monitoring during the agreement, and post-award audits. Condition, including Perspective Lehigh University passed through $3,277,289 to its subrecipients in the research and development cluster (R&D cluster), which represents approximately 10% of total R&D cluster expenditures for the year ended June 30, 2022. As a pass-through entity, Lehigh University?s Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) is responsible for monitoring the activities and compliance of its subrecipients. Monitoring includes reviewing the compliance audit reports from its subrecipients as they become available through the federal audit clearinghouse to ascertain the existence of non-compliance and appropriate follow-up with the subrecipient to ensure timely and appropriate corrective action is taken to remediate the finding(s). Our procedures performed determined that the Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) did not complete the review of their compliance reports within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Cause and Effect The ORSP lost two full time personnel in summer of 2020, one of whom was responsible for the review of the subrecipient compliance reports and issuing the management decision for any audit findings. That position was not filled until the December 2021 and no one else in ORSP completed these reviews during this timeframe. The lack of monitoring subrecipients timely could result in continuing to pass-through federal monies to a subrecipient who is not in compliance with federal compliance. Noncompliance by a subrecipient that is not identified and addressed timely could jeopardize the University?s receipt of future federal awards and public reputation. Questioned Costs No questioned costs were identified. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding Yes, finding 2021-001 Recommendation We recommend that Lehigh University strengthen its processes and controls to ensure the review of its subrecipient?s compliance reports is completed within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Views of Responsible Officials Lehigh University accepts this finding. The review of fiscal year 2022 has been conducted and is complete for the review of those institutions who have submitted their audit reports to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse.
Finding 2022-001 Federal Agency: Various Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Year: Programs active between July 1, 2021 ? June 30, 2022 Compliance requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Finding Type: Significant Deficiency Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must: Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward, and achieves performance goals. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: ? Reviewing financial and programmatic (performance and special reports) required by the pass-through entity (PTE). ? Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means. ? Issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE as required by 2 CFR section 200.521. ? The pass-through entity is responsible for resolving audit findings specifically related to the subaward and not responsible for resolving crosscutting findings. If a subrecipient has a current Single Audit report posted in the Federal Audit Clearinghouse and has not otherwise been excluded from receipt of Federal funding (e.g., has been debarred or suspended), the pass-through entity may rely on the subrecipient?s cognizant audit agency or cognizant oversight agency to perform audit follow-up and make management decisions related to cross-cutting findings in accordance with section 2 CFR 200.513(a)(3)(vii). Such reliance does not eliminate the responsibility of the pass-through entity to issue subawards that conform to agency and award-specific requirements, to manage risk through ongoing subaward monitoring, and to monitor the status of the findings that are specifically related to the subaward. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of 2 CFR 200.500 when it is expected that the subrecipient?s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in 2 CFR 200.501. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.521(c) and (d): the pass-through entity must be responsible for issuing a management decision for audit findings that relate to Federal awards it makes to subrecipients. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity responsible for issuing a management decision must do so within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the Federal Audit Clearinghouse (FAC). In accordance with 2 CFR 200.501(h), since 2 CFR Part 200 does not make Subpart F applicable to for-profit subrecipients, the PTE is responsible for establishing requirements, as necessary, to ensure compliance by for-profit subrecipients for the subaward. The agreement with the for-profit subrecipient must describe applicable compliance requirements and the for-profit subrecipient?s compliance responsibility. Methods to ensure compliance for federal awards made to for-profit subrecipients may include pre-award audits, monitoring during the agreement, and post-award audits. Condition, including Perspective Lehigh University passed through $3,277,289 to its subrecipients in the research and development cluster (R&D cluster), which represents approximately 10% of total R&D cluster expenditures for the year ended June 30, 2022. As a pass-through entity, Lehigh University?s Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) is responsible for monitoring the activities and compliance of its subrecipients. Monitoring includes reviewing the compliance audit reports from its subrecipients as they become available through the federal audit clearinghouse to ascertain the existence of non-compliance and appropriate follow-up with the subrecipient to ensure timely and appropriate corrective action is taken to remediate the finding(s). Our procedures performed determined that the Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) did not complete the review of their compliance reports within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Cause and Effect The ORSP lost two full time personnel in summer of 2020, one of whom was responsible for the review of the subrecipient compliance reports and issuing the management decision for any audit findings. That position was not filled until the December 2021 and no one else in ORSP completed these reviews during this timeframe. The lack of monitoring subrecipients timely could result in continuing to pass-through federal monies to a subrecipient who is not in compliance with federal compliance. Noncompliance by a subrecipient that is not identified and addressed timely could jeopardize the University?s receipt of future federal awards and public reputation. Questioned Costs No questioned costs were identified. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding Yes, finding 2021-001 Recommendation We recommend that Lehigh University strengthen its processes and controls to ensure the review of its subrecipient?s compliance reports is completed within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Views of Responsible Officials Lehigh University accepts this finding. The review of fiscal year 2022 has been conducted and is complete for the review of those institutions who have submitted their audit reports to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse.
Finding 2022-001 Federal Agency: Various Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Year: Programs active between July 1, 2021 ? June 30, 2022 Compliance requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Finding Type: Significant Deficiency Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must: Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward, and achieves performance goals. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: ? Reviewing financial and programmatic (performance and special reports) required by the pass-through entity (PTE). ? Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means. ? Issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE as required by 2 CFR section 200.521. ? The pass-through entity is responsible for resolving audit findings specifically related to the subaward and not responsible for resolving crosscutting findings. If a subrecipient has a current Single Audit report posted in the Federal Audit Clearinghouse and has not otherwise been excluded from receipt of Federal funding (e.g., has been debarred or suspended), the pass-through entity may rely on the subrecipient?s cognizant audit agency or cognizant oversight agency to perform audit follow-up and make management decisions related to cross-cutting findings in accordance with section 2 CFR 200.513(a)(3)(vii). Such reliance does not eliminate the responsibility of the pass-through entity to issue subawards that conform to agency and award-specific requirements, to manage risk through ongoing subaward monitoring, and to monitor the status of the findings that are specifically related to the subaward. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of 2 CFR 200.500 when it is expected that the subrecipient?s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in 2 CFR 200.501. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.521(c) and (d): the pass-through entity must be responsible for issuing a management decision for audit findings that relate to Federal awards it makes to subrecipients. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity responsible for issuing a management decision must do so within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the Federal Audit Clearinghouse (FAC). In accordance with 2 CFR 200.501(h), since 2 CFR Part 200 does not make Subpart F applicable to for-profit subrecipients, the PTE is responsible for establishing requirements, as necessary, to ensure compliance by for-profit subrecipients for the subaward. The agreement with the for-profit subrecipient must describe applicable compliance requirements and the for-profit subrecipient?s compliance responsibility. Methods to ensure compliance for federal awards made to for-profit subrecipients may include pre-award audits, monitoring during the agreement, and post-award audits. Condition, including Perspective Lehigh University passed through $3,277,289 to its subrecipients in the research and development cluster (R&D cluster), which represents approximately 10% of total R&D cluster expenditures for the year ended June 30, 2022. As a pass-through entity, Lehigh University?s Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) is responsible for monitoring the activities and compliance of its subrecipients. Monitoring includes reviewing the compliance audit reports from its subrecipients as they become available through the federal audit clearinghouse to ascertain the existence of non-compliance and appropriate follow-up with the subrecipient to ensure timely and appropriate corrective action is taken to remediate the finding(s). Our procedures performed determined that the Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) did not complete the review of their compliance reports within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Cause and Effect The ORSP lost two full time personnel in summer of 2020, one of whom was responsible for the review of the subrecipient compliance reports and issuing the management decision for any audit findings. That position was not filled until the December 2021 and no one else in ORSP completed these reviews during this timeframe. The lack of monitoring subrecipients timely could result in continuing to pass-through federal monies to a subrecipient who is not in compliance with federal compliance. Noncompliance by a subrecipient that is not identified and addressed timely could jeopardize the University?s receipt of future federal awards and public reputation. Questioned Costs No questioned costs were identified. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding Yes, finding 2021-001 Recommendation We recommend that Lehigh University strengthen its processes and controls to ensure the review of its subrecipient?s compliance reports is completed within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Views of Responsible Officials Lehigh University accepts this finding. The review of fiscal year 2022 has been conducted and is complete for the review of those institutions who have submitted their audit reports to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse.
Finding 2022-001 Federal Agency: Various Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Year: Programs active between July 1, 2021 ? June 30, 2022 Compliance requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Finding Type: Significant Deficiency Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must: Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward, and achieves performance goals. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: ? Reviewing financial and programmatic (performance and special reports) required by the pass-through entity (PTE). ? Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means. ? Issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE as required by 2 CFR section 200.521. ? The pass-through entity is responsible for resolving audit findings specifically related to the subaward and not responsible for resolving crosscutting findings. If a subrecipient has a current Single Audit report posted in the Federal Audit Clearinghouse and has not otherwise been excluded from receipt of Federal funding (e.g., has been debarred or suspended), the pass-through entity may rely on the subrecipient?s cognizant audit agency or cognizant oversight agency to perform audit follow-up and make management decisions related to cross-cutting findings in accordance with section 2 CFR 200.513(a)(3)(vii). Such reliance does not eliminate the responsibility of the pass-through entity to issue subawards that conform to agency and award-specific requirements, to manage risk through ongoing subaward monitoring, and to monitor the status of the findings that are specifically related to the subaward. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of 2 CFR 200.500 when it is expected that the subrecipient?s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in 2 CFR 200.501. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.521(c) and (d): the pass-through entity must be responsible for issuing a management decision for audit findings that relate to Federal awards it makes to subrecipients. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity responsible for issuing a management decision must do so within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the Federal Audit Clearinghouse (FAC). In accordance with 2 CFR 200.501(h), since 2 CFR Part 200 does not make Subpart F applicable to for-profit subrecipients, the PTE is responsible for establishing requirements, as necessary, to ensure compliance by for-profit subrecipients for the subaward. The agreement with the for-profit subrecipient must describe applicable compliance requirements and the for-profit subrecipient?s compliance responsibility. Methods to ensure compliance for federal awards made to for-profit subrecipients may include pre-award audits, monitoring during the agreement, and post-award audits. Condition, including Perspective Lehigh University passed through $3,277,289 to its subrecipients in the research and development cluster (R&D cluster), which represents approximately 10% of total R&D cluster expenditures for the year ended June 30, 2022. As a pass-through entity, Lehigh University?s Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) is responsible for monitoring the activities and compliance of its subrecipients. Monitoring includes reviewing the compliance audit reports from its subrecipients as they become available through the federal audit clearinghouse to ascertain the existence of non-compliance and appropriate follow-up with the subrecipient to ensure timely and appropriate corrective action is taken to remediate the finding(s). Our procedures performed determined that the Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) did not complete the review of their compliance reports within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Cause and Effect The ORSP lost two full time personnel in summer of 2020, one of whom was responsible for the review of the subrecipient compliance reports and issuing the management decision for any audit findings. That position was not filled until the December 2021 and no one else in ORSP completed these reviews during this timeframe. The lack of monitoring subrecipients timely could result in continuing to pass-through federal monies to a subrecipient who is not in compliance with federal compliance. Noncompliance by a subrecipient that is not identified and addressed timely could jeopardize the University?s receipt of future federal awards and public reputation. Questioned Costs No questioned costs were identified. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding Yes, finding 2021-001 Recommendation We recommend that Lehigh University strengthen its processes and controls to ensure the review of its subrecipient?s compliance reports is completed within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Views of Responsible Officials Lehigh University accepts this finding. The review of fiscal year 2022 has been conducted and is complete for the review of those institutions who have submitted their audit reports to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse.
Finding 2022-001 Federal Agency: Various Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Year: Programs active between July 1, 2021 ? June 30, 2022 Compliance requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Finding Type: Significant Deficiency Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must: Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward, and achieves performance goals. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: ? Reviewing financial and programmatic (performance and special reports) required by the pass-through entity (PTE). ? Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means. ? Issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE as required by 2 CFR section 200.521. ? The pass-through entity is responsible for resolving audit findings specifically related to the subaward and not responsible for resolving crosscutting findings. If a subrecipient has a current Single Audit report posted in the Federal Audit Clearinghouse and has not otherwise been excluded from receipt of Federal funding (e.g., has been debarred or suspended), the pass-through entity may rely on the subrecipient?s cognizant audit agency or cognizant oversight agency to perform audit follow-up and make management decisions related to cross-cutting findings in accordance with section 2 CFR 200.513(a)(3)(vii). Such reliance does not eliminate the responsibility of the pass-through entity to issue subawards that conform to agency and award-specific requirements, to manage risk through ongoing subaward monitoring, and to monitor the status of the findings that are specifically related to the subaward. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of 2 CFR 200.500 when it is expected that the subrecipient?s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in 2 CFR 200.501. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.521(c) and (d): the pass-through entity must be responsible for issuing a management decision for audit findings that relate to Federal awards it makes to subrecipients. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity responsible for issuing a management decision must do so within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the Federal Audit Clearinghouse (FAC). In accordance with 2 CFR 200.501(h), since 2 CFR Part 200 does not make Subpart F applicable to for-profit subrecipients, the PTE is responsible for establishing requirements, as necessary, to ensure compliance by for-profit subrecipients for the subaward. The agreement with the for-profit subrecipient must describe applicable compliance requirements and the for-profit subrecipient?s compliance responsibility. Methods to ensure compliance for federal awards made to for-profit subrecipients may include pre-award audits, monitoring during the agreement, and post-award audits. Condition, including Perspective Lehigh University passed through $3,277,289 to its subrecipients in the research and development cluster (R&D cluster), which represents approximately 10% of total R&D cluster expenditures for the year ended June 30, 2022. As a pass-through entity, Lehigh University?s Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) is responsible for monitoring the activities and compliance of its subrecipients. Monitoring includes reviewing the compliance audit reports from its subrecipients as they become available through the federal audit clearinghouse to ascertain the existence of non-compliance and appropriate follow-up with the subrecipient to ensure timely and appropriate corrective action is taken to remediate the finding(s). Our procedures performed determined that the Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) did not complete the review of their compliance reports within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Cause and Effect The ORSP lost two full time personnel in summer of 2020, one of whom was responsible for the review of the subrecipient compliance reports and issuing the management decision for any audit findings. That position was not filled until the December 2021 and no one else in ORSP completed these reviews during this timeframe. The lack of monitoring subrecipients timely could result in continuing to pass-through federal monies to a subrecipient who is not in compliance with federal compliance. Noncompliance by a subrecipient that is not identified and addressed timely could jeopardize the University?s receipt of future federal awards and public reputation. Questioned Costs No questioned costs were identified. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding Yes, finding 2021-001 Recommendation We recommend that Lehigh University strengthen its processes and controls to ensure the review of its subrecipient?s compliance reports is completed within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Views of Responsible Officials Lehigh University accepts this finding. The review of fiscal year 2022 has been conducted and is complete for the review of those institutions who have submitted their audit reports to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse.
Finding 2022-001 Federal Agency: Various Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Year: Programs active between July 1, 2021 ? June 30, 2022 Compliance requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Finding Type: Significant Deficiency Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must: Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward, and achieves performance goals. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: ? Reviewing financial and programmatic (performance and special reports) required by the pass-through entity (PTE). ? Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means. ? Issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE as required by 2 CFR section 200.521. ? The pass-through entity is responsible for resolving audit findings specifically related to the subaward and not responsible for resolving crosscutting findings. If a subrecipient has a current Single Audit report posted in the Federal Audit Clearinghouse and has not otherwise been excluded from receipt of Federal funding (e.g., has been debarred or suspended), the pass-through entity may rely on the subrecipient?s cognizant audit agency or cognizant oversight agency to perform audit follow-up and make management decisions related to cross-cutting findings in accordance with section 2 CFR 200.513(a)(3)(vii). Such reliance does not eliminate the responsibility of the pass-through entity to issue subawards that conform to agency and award-specific requirements, to manage risk through ongoing subaward monitoring, and to monitor the status of the findings that are specifically related to the subaward. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of 2 CFR 200.500 when it is expected that the subrecipient?s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in 2 CFR 200.501. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.521(c) and (d): the pass-through entity must be responsible for issuing a management decision for audit findings that relate to Federal awards it makes to subrecipients. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity responsible for issuing a management decision must do so within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the Federal Audit Clearinghouse (FAC). In accordance with 2 CFR 200.501(h), since 2 CFR Part 200 does not make Subpart F applicable to for-profit subrecipients, the PTE is responsible for establishing requirements, as necessary, to ensure compliance by for-profit subrecipients for the subaward. The agreement with the for-profit subrecipient must describe applicable compliance requirements and the for-profit subrecipient?s compliance responsibility. Methods to ensure compliance for federal awards made to for-profit subrecipients may include pre-award audits, monitoring during the agreement, and post-award audits. Condition, including Perspective Lehigh University passed through $3,277,289 to its subrecipients in the research and development cluster (R&D cluster), which represents approximately 10% of total R&D cluster expenditures for the year ended June 30, 2022. As a pass-through entity, Lehigh University?s Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) is responsible for monitoring the activities and compliance of its subrecipients. Monitoring includes reviewing the compliance audit reports from its subrecipients as they become available through the federal audit clearinghouse to ascertain the existence of non-compliance and appropriate follow-up with the subrecipient to ensure timely and appropriate corrective action is taken to remediate the finding(s). Our procedures performed determined that the Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) did not complete the review of their compliance reports within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Cause and Effect The ORSP lost two full time personnel in summer of 2020, one of whom was responsible for the review of the subrecipient compliance reports and issuing the management decision for any audit findings. That position was not filled until the December 2021 and no one else in ORSP completed these reviews during this timeframe. The lack of monitoring subrecipients timely could result in continuing to pass-through federal monies to a subrecipient who is not in compliance with federal compliance. Noncompliance by a subrecipient that is not identified and addressed timely could jeopardize the University?s receipt of future federal awards and public reputation. Questioned Costs No questioned costs were identified. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding Yes, finding 2021-001 Recommendation We recommend that Lehigh University strengthen its processes and controls to ensure the review of its subrecipient?s compliance reports is completed within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Views of Responsible Officials Lehigh University accepts this finding. The review of fiscal year 2022 has been conducted and is complete for the review of those institutions who have submitted their audit reports to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse.
Finding 2022-001 Federal Agency: Various Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Year: Programs active between July 1, 2021 ? June 30, 2022 Compliance requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Finding Type: Significant Deficiency Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must: Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward, and achieves performance goals. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: ? Reviewing financial and programmatic (performance and special reports) required by the pass-through entity (PTE). ? Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means. ? Issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE as required by 2 CFR section 200.521. ? The pass-through entity is responsible for resolving audit findings specifically related to the subaward and not responsible for resolving crosscutting findings. If a subrecipient has a current Single Audit report posted in the Federal Audit Clearinghouse and has not otherwise been excluded from receipt of Federal funding (e.g., has been debarred or suspended), the pass-through entity may rely on the subrecipient?s cognizant audit agency or cognizant oversight agency to perform audit follow-up and make management decisions related to cross-cutting findings in accordance with section 2 CFR 200.513(a)(3)(vii). Such reliance does not eliminate the responsibility of the pass-through entity to issue subawards that conform to agency and award-specific requirements, to manage risk through ongoing subaward monitoring, and to monitor the status of the findings that are specifically related to the subaward. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of 2 CFR 200.500 when it is expected that the subrecipient?s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in 2 CFR 200.501. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.521(c) and (d): the pass-through entity must be responsible for issuing a management decision for audit findings that relate to Federal awards it makes to subrecipients. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity responsible for issuing a management decision must do so within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the Federal Audit Clearinghouse (FAC). In accordance with 2 CFR 200.501(h), since 2 CFR Part 200 does not make Subpart F applicable to for-profit subrecipients, the PTE is responsible for establishing requirements, as necessary, to ensure compliance by for-profit subrecipients for the subaward. The agreement with the for-profit subrecipient must describe applicable compliance requirements and the for-profit subrecipient?s compliance responsibility. Methods to ensure compliance for federal awards made to for-profit subrecipients may include pre-award audits, monitoring during the agreement, and post-award audits. Condition, including Perspective Lehigh University passed through $3,277,289 to its subrecipients in the research and development cluster (R&D cluster), which represents approximately 10% of total R&D cluster expenditures for the year ended June 30, 2022. As a pass-through entity, Lehigh University?s Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) is responsible for monitoring the activities and compliance of its subrecipients. Monitoring includes reviewing the compliance audit reports from its subrecipients as they become available through the federal audit clearinghouse to ascertain the existence of non-compliance and appropriate follow-up with the subrecipient to ensure timely and appropriate corrective action is taken to remediate the finding(s). Our procedures performed determined that the Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) did not complete the review of their compliance reports within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Cause and Effect The ORSP lost two full time personnel in summer of 2020, one of whom was responsible for the review of the subrecipient compliance reports and issuing the management decision for any audit findings. That position was not filled until the December 2021 and no one else in ORSP completed these reviews during this timeframe. The lack of monitoring subrecipients timely could result in continuing to pass-through federal monies to a subrecipient who is not in compliance with federal compliance. Noncompliance by a subrecipient that is not identified and addressed timely could jeopardize the University?s receipt of future federal awards and public reputation. Questioned Costs No questioned costs were identified. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding Yes, finding 2021-001 Recommendation We recommend that Lehigh University strengthen its processes and controls to ensure the review of its subrecipient?s compliance reports is completed within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Views of Responsible Officials Lehigh University accepts this finding. The review of fiscal year 2022 has been conducted and is complete for the review of those institutions who have submitted their audit reports to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse.
Finding 2022-001 Federal Agency: Various Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Year: Programs active between July 1, 2021 ? June 30, 2022 Compliance requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Finding Type: Significant Deficiency Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must: Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward, and achieves performance goals. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: ? Reviewing financial and programmatic (performance and special reports) required by the pass-through entity (PTE). ? Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means. ? Issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE as required by 2 CFR section 200.521. ? The pass-through entity is responsible for resolving audit findings specifically related to the subaward and not responsible for resolving crosscutting findings. If a subrecipient has a current Single Audit report posted in the Federal Audit Clearinghouse and has not otherwise been excluded from receipt of Federal funding (e.g., has been debarred or suspended), the pass-through entity may rely on the subrecipient?s cognizant audit agency or cognizant oversight agency to perform audit follow-up and make management decisions related to cross-cutting findings in accordance with section 2 CFR 200.513(a)(3)(vii). Such reliance does not eliminate the responsibility of the pass-through entity to issue subawards that conform to agency and award-specific requirements, to manage risk through ongoing subaward monitoring, and to monitor the status of the findings that are specifically related to the subaward. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of 2 CFR 200.500 when it is expected that the subrecipient?s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in 2 CFR 200.501. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.521(c) and (d): the pass-through entity must be responsible for issuing a management decision for audit findings that relate to Federal awards it makes to subrecipients. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity responsible for issuing a management decision must do so within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the Federal Audit Clearinghouse (FAC). In accordance with 2 CFR 200.501(h), since 2 CFR Part 200 does not make Subpart F applicable to for-profit subrecipients, the PTE is responsible for establishing requirements, as necessary, to ensure compliance by for-profit subrecipients for the subaward. The agreement with the for-profit subrecipient must describe applicable compliance requirements and the for-profit subrecipient?s compliance responsibility. Methods to ensure compliance for federal awards made to for-profit subrecipients may include pre-award audits, monitoring during the agreement, and post-award audits. Condition, including Perspective Lehigh University passed through $3,277,289 to its subrecipients in the research and development cluster (R&D cluster), which represents approximately 10% of total R&D cluster expenditures for the year ended June 30, 2022. As a pass-through entity, Lehigh University?s Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) is responsible for monitoring the activities and compliance of its subrecipients. Monitoring includes reviewing the compliance audit reports from its subrecipients as they become available through the federal audit clearinghouse to ascertain the existence of non-compliance and appropriate follow-up with the subrecipient to ensure timely and appropriate corrective action is taken to remediate the finding(s). Our procedures performed determined that the Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) did not complete the review of their compliance reports within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Cause and Effect The ORSP lost two full time personnel in summer of 2020, one of whom was responsible for the review of the subrecipient compliance reports and issuing the management decision for any audit findings. That position was not filled until the December 2021 and no one else in ORSP completed these reviews during this timeframe. The lack of monitoring subrecipients timely could result in continuing to pass-through federal monies to a subrecipient who is not in compliance with federal compliance. Noncompliance by a subrecipient that is not identified and addressed timely could jeopardize the University?s receipt of future federal awards and public reputation. Questioned Costs No questioned costs were identified. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding Yes, finding 2021-001 Recommendation We recommend that Lehigh University strengthen its processes and controls to ensure the review of its subrecipient?s compliance reports is completed within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Views of Responsible Officials Lehigh University accepts this finding. The review of fiscal year 2022 has been conducted and is complete for the review of those institutions who have submitted their audit reports to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse.
Finding 2022-001 Federal Agency: Various Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Year: Programs active between July 1, 2021 ? June 30, 2022 Compliance requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Finding Type: Significant Deficiency Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must: Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward, and achieves performance goals. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: ? Reviewing financial and programmatic (performance and special reports) required by the pass-through entity (PTE). ? Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means. ? Issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE as required by 2 CFR section 200.521. ? The pass-through entity is responsible for resolving audit findings specifically related to the subaward and not responsible for resolving crosscutting findings. If a subrecipient has a current Single Audit report posted in the Federal Audit Clearinghouse and has not otherwise been excluded from receipt of Federal funding (e.g., has been debarred or suspended), the pass-through entity may rely on the subrecipient?s cognizant audit agency or cognizant oversight agency to perform audit follow-up and make management decisions related to cross-cutting findings in accordance with section 2 CFR 200.513(a)(3)(vii). Such reliance does not eliminate the responsibility of the pass-through entity to issue subawards that conform to agency and award-specific requirements, to manage risk through ongoing subaward monitoring, and to monitor the status of the findings that are specifically related to the subaward. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of 2 CFR 200.500 when it is expected that the subrecipient?s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in 2 CFR 200.501. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.521(c) and (d): the pass-through entity must be responsible for issuing a management decision for audit findings that relate to Federal awards it makes to subrecipients. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity responsible for issuing a management decision must do so within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the Federal Audit Clearinghouse (FAC). In accordance with 2 CFR 200.501(h), since 2 CFR Part 200 does not make Subpart F applicable to for-profit subrecipients, the PTE is responsible for establishing requirements, as necessary, to ensure compliance by for-profit subrecipients for the subaward. The agreement with the for-profit subrecipient must describe applicable compliance requirements and the for-profit subrecipient?s compliance responsibility. Methods to ensure compliance for federal awards made to for-profit subrecipients may include pre-award audits, monitoring during the agreement, and post-award audits. Condition, including Perspective Lehigh University passed through $3,277,289 to its subrecipients in the research and development cluster (R&D cluster), which represents approximately 10% of total R&D cluster expenditures for the year ended June 30, 2022. As a pass-through entity, Lehigh University?s Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) is responsible for monitoring the activities and compliance of its subrecipients. Monitoring includes reviewing the compliance audit reports from its subrecipients as they become available through the federal audit clearinghouse to ascertain the existence of non-compliance and appropriate follow-up with the subrecipient to ensure timely and appropriate corrective action is taken to remediate the finding(s). Our procedures performed determined that the Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) did not complete the review of their compliance reports within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Cause and Effect The ORSP lost two full time personnel in summer of 2020, one of whom was responsible for the review of the subrecipient compliance reports and issuing the management decision for any audit findings. That position was not filled until the December 2021 and no one else in ORSP completed these reviews during this timeframe. The lack of monitoring subrecipients timely could result in continuing to pass-through federal monies to a subrecipient who is not in compliance with federal compliance. Noncompliance by a subrecipient that is not identified and addressed timely could jeopardize the University?s receipt of future federal awards and public reputation. Questioned Costs No questioned costs were identified. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding Yes, finding 2021-001 Recommendation We recommend that Lehigh University strengthen its processes and controls to ensure the review of its subrecipient?s compliance reports is completed within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Views of Responsible Officials Lehigh University accepts this finding. The review of fiscal year 2022 has been conducted and is complete for the review of those institutions who have submitted their audit reports to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse.
Finding 2022-001 Federal Agency: Various Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Year: Programs active between July 1, 2021 ? June 30, 2022 Compliance requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Finding Type: Significant Deficiency Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must: Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward, and achieves performance goals. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: ? Reviewing financial and programmatic (performance and special reports) required by the pass-through entity (PTE). ? Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means. ? Issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE as required by 2 CFR section 200.521. ? The pass-through entity is responsible for resolving audit findings specifically related to the subaward and not responsible for resolving crosscutting findings. If a subrecipient has a current Single Audit report posted in the Federal Audit Clearinghouse and has not otherwise been excluded from receipt of Federal funding (e.g., has been debarred or suspended), the pass-through entity may rely on the subrecipient?s cognizant audit agency or cognizant oversight agency to perform audit follow-up and make management decisions related to cross-cutting findings in accordance with section 2 CFR 200.513(a)(3)(vii). Such reliance does not eliminate the responsibility of the pass-through entity to issue subawards that conform to agency and award-specific requirements, to manage risk through ongoing subaward monitoring, and to monitor the status of the findings that are specifically related to the subaward. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of 2 CFR 200.500 when it is expected that the subrecipient?s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in 2 CFR 200.501. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.521(c) and (d): the pass-through entity must be responsible for issuing a management decision for audit findings that relate to Federal awards it makes to subrecipients. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity responsible for issuing a management decision must do so within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the Federal Audit Clearinghouse (FAC). In accordance with 2 CFR 200.501(h), since 2 CFR Part 200 does not make Subpart F applicable to for-profit subrecipients, the PTE is responsible for establishing requirements, as necessary, to ensure compliance by for-profit subrecipients for the subaward. The agreement with the for-profit subrecipient must describe applicable compliance requirements and the for-profit subrecipient?s compliance responsibility. Methods to ensure compliance for federal awards made to for-profit subrecipients may include pre-award audits, monitoring during the agreement, and post-award audits. Condition, including Perspective Lehigh University passed through $3,277,289 to its subrecipients in the research and development cluster (R&D cluster), which represents approximately 10% of total R&D cluster expenditures for the year ended June 30, 2022. As a pass-through entity, Lehigh University?s Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) is responsible for monitoring the activities and compliance of its subrecipients. Monitoring includes reviewing the compliance audit reports from its subrecipients as they become available through the federal audit clearinghouse to ascertain the existence of non-compliance and appropriate follow-up with the subrecipient to ensure timely and appropriate corrective action is taken to remediate the finding(s). Our procedures performed determined that the Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) did not complete the review of their compliance reports within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Cause and Effect The ORSP lost two full time personnel in summer of 2020, one of whom was responsible for the review of the subrecipient compliance reports and issuing the management decision for any audit findings. That position was not filled until the December 2021 and no one else in ORSP completed these reviews during this timeframe. The lack of monitoring subrecipients timely could result in continuing to pass-through federal monies to a subrecipient who is not in compliance with federal compliance. Noncompliance by a subrecipient that is not identified and addressed timely could jeopardize the University?s receipt of future federal awards and public reputation. Questioned Costs No questioned costs were identified. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding Yes, finding 2021-001 Recommendation We recommend that Lehigh University strengthen its processes and controls to ensure the review of its subrecipient?s compliance reports is completed within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Views of Responsible Officials Lehigh University accepts this finding. The review of fiscal year 2022 has been conducted and is complete for the review of those institutions who have submitted their audit reports to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse.
Finding 2022-001 Federal Agency: Various Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Year: Programs active between July 1, 2021 ? June 30, 2022 Compliance requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Finding Type: Significant Deficiency Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must: Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward, and achieves performance goals. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: ? Reviewing financial and programmatic (performance and special reports) required by the pass-through entity (PTE). ? Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means. ? Issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE as required by 2 CFR section 200.521. ? The pass-through entity is responsible for resolving audit findings specifically related to the subaward and not responsible for resolving crosscutting findings. If a subrecipient has a current Single Audit report posted in the Federal Audit Clearinghouse and has not otherwise been excluded from receipt of Federal funding (e.g., has been debarred or suspended), the pass-through entity may rely on the subrecipient?s cognizant audit agency or cognizant oversight agency to perform audit follow-up and make management decisions related to cross-cutting findings in accordance with section 2 CFR 200.513(a)(3)(vii). Such reliance does not eliminate the responsibility of the pass-through entity to issue subawards that conform to agency and award-specific requirements, to manage risk through ongoing subaward monitoring, and to monitor the status of the findings that are specifically related to the subaward. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of 2 CFR 200.500 when it is expected that the subrecipient?s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in 2 CFR 200.501. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.521(c) and (d): the pass-through entity must be responsible for issuing a management decision for audit findings that relate to Federal awards it makes to subrecipients. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity responsible for issuing a management decision must do so within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the Federal Audit Clearinghouse (FAC). In accordance with 2 CFR 200.501(h), since 2 CFR Part 200 does not make Subpart F applicable to for-profit subrecipients, the PTE is responsible for establishing requirements, as necessary, to ensure compliance by for-profit subrecipients for the subaward. The agreement with the for-profit subrecipient must describe applicable compliance requirements and the for-profit subrecipient?s compliance responsibility. Methods to ensure compliance for federal awards made to for-profit subrecipients may include pre-award audits, monitoring during the agreement, and post-award audits. Condition, including Perspective Lehigh University passed through $3,277,289 to its subrecipients in the research and development cluster (R&D cluster), which represents approximately 10% of total R&D cluster expenditures for the year ended June 30, 2022. As a pass-through entity, Lehigh University?s Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) is responsible for monitoring the activities and compliance of its subrecipients. Monitoring includes reviewing the compliance audit reports from its subrecipients as they become available through the federal audit clearinghouse to ascertain the existence of non-compliance and appropriate follow-up with the subrecipient to ensure timely and appropriate corrective action is taken to remediate the finding(s). Our procedures performed determined that the Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) did not complete the review of their compliance reports within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Cause and Effect The ORSP lost two full time personnel in summer of 2020, one of whom was responsible for the review of the subrecipient compliance reports and issuing the management decision for any audit findings. That position was not filled until the December 2021 and no one else in ORSP completed these reviews during this timeframe. The lack of monitoring subrecipients timely could result in continuing to pass-through federal monies to a subrecipient who is not in compliance with federal compliance. Noncompliance by a subrecipient that is not identified and addressed timely could jeopardize the University?s receipt of future federal awards and public reputation. Questioned Costs No questioned costs were identified. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding Yes, finding 2021-001 Recommendation We recommend that Lehigh University strengthen its processes and controls to ensure the review of its subrecipient?s compliance reports is completed within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Views of Responsible Officials Lehigh University accepts this finding. The review of fiscal year 2022 has been conducted and is complete for the review of those institutions who have submitted their audit reports to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse.
Finding 2022-001 Federal Agency: Various Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Year: Programs active between July 1, 2021 ? June 30, 2022 Compliance requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Finding Type: Significant Deficiency Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must: Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward, and achieves performance goals. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: ? Reviewing financial and programmatic (performance and special reports) required by the pass-through entity (PTE). ? Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means. ? Issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE as required by 2 CFR section 200.521. ? The pass-through entity is responsible for resolving audit findings specifically related to the subaward and not responsible for resolving crosscutting findings. If a subrecipient has a current Single Audit report posted in the Federal Audit Clearinghouse and has not otherwise been excluded from receipt of Federal funding (e.g., has been debarred or suspended), the pass-through entity may rely on the subrecipient?s cognizant audit agency or cognizant oversight agency to perform audit follow-up and make management decisions related to cross-cutting findings in accordance with section 2 CFR 200.513(a)(3)(vii). Such reliance does not eliminate the responsibility of the pass-through entity to issue subawards that conform to agency and award-specific requirements, to manage risk through ongoing subaward monitoring, and to monitor the status of the findings that are specifically related to the subaward. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of 2 CFR 200.500 when it is expected that the subrecipient?s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in 2 CFR 200.501. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.521(c) and (d): the pass-through entity must be responsible for issuing a management decision for audit findings that relate to Federal awards it makes to subrecipients. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity responsible for issuing a management decision must do so within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the Federal Audit Clearinghouse (FAC). In accordance with 2 CFR 200.501(h), since 2 CFR Part 200 does not make Subpart F applicable to for-profit subrecipients, the PTE is responsible for establishing requirements, as necessary, to ensure compliance by for-profit subrecipients for the subaward. The agreement with the for-profit subrecipient must describe applicable compliance requirements and the for-profit subrecipient?s compliance responsibility. Methods to ensure compliance for federal awards made to for-profit subrecipients may include pre-award audits, monitoring during the agreement, and post-award audits. Condition, including Perspective Lehigh University passed through $3,277,289 to its subrecipients in the research and development cluster (R&D cluster), which represents approximately 10% of total R&D cluster expenditures for the year ended June 30, 2022. As a pass-through entity, Lehigh University?s Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) is responsible for monitoring the activities and compliance of its subrecipients. Monitoring includes reviewing the compliance audit reports from its subrecipients as they become available through the federal audit clearinghouse to ascertain the existence of non-compliance and appropriate follow-up with the subrecipient to ensure timely and appropriate corrective action is taken to remediate the finding(s). Our procedures performed determined that the Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) did not complete the review of their compliance reports within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Cause and Effect The ORSP lost two full time personnel in summer of 2020, one of whom was responsible for the review of the subrecipient compliance reports and issuing the management decision for any audit findings. That position was not filled until the December 2021 and no one else in ORSP completed these reviews during this timeframe. The lack of monitoring subrecipients timely could result in continuing to pass-through federal monies to a subrecipient who is not in compliance with federal compliance. Noncompliance by a subrecipient that is not identified and addressed timely could jeopardize the University?s receipt of future federal awards and public reputation. Questioned Costs No questioned costs were identified. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding Yes, finding 2021-001 Recommendation We recommend that Lehigh University strengthen its processes and controls to ensure the review of its subrecipient?s compliance reports is completed within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Views of Responsible Officials Lehigh University accepts this finding. The review of fiscal year 2022 has been conducted and is complete for the review of those institutions who have submitted their audit reports to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse.
Finding 2022-001 Federal Agency: Various Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Year: Programs active between July 1, 2021 ? June 30, 2022 Compliance requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Finding Type: Significant Deficiency Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must: Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward, and achieves performance goals. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: ? Reviewing financial and programmatic (performance and special reports) required by the pass-through entity (PTE). ? Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means. ? Issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE as required by 2 CFR section 200.521. ? The pass-through entity is responsible for resolving audit findings specifically related to the subaward and not responsible for resolving crosscutting findings. If a subrecipient has a current Single Audit report posted in the Federal Audit Clearinghouse and has not otherwise been excluded from receipt of Federal funding (e.g., has been debarred or suspended), the pass-through entity may rely on the subrecipient?s cognizant audit agency or cognizant oversight agency to perform audit follow-up and make management decisions related to cross-cutting findings in accordance with section 2 CFR 200.513(a)(3)(vii). Such reliance does not eliminate the responsibility of the pass-through entity to issue subawards that conform to agency and award-specific requirements, to manage risk through ongoing subaward monitoring, and to monitor the status of the findings that are specifically related to the subaward. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of 2 CFR 200.500 when it is expected that the subrecipient?s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in 2 CFR 200.501. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.521(c) and (d): the pass-through entity must be responsible for issuing a management decision for audit findings that relate to Federal awards it makes to subrecipients. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity responsible for issuing a management decision must do so within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the Federal Audit Clearinghouse (FAC). In accordance with 2 CFR 200.501(h), since 2 CFR Part 200 does not make Subpart F applicable to for-profit subrecipients, the PTE is responsible for establishing requirements, as necessary, to ensure compliance by for-profit subrecipients for the subaward. The agreement with the for-profit subrecipient must describe applicable compliance requirements and the for-profit subrecipient?s compliance responsibility. Methods to ensure compliance for federal awards made to for-profit subrecipients may include pre-award audits, monitoring during the agreement, and post-award audits. Condition, including Perspective Lehigh University passed through $3,277,289 to its subrecipients in the research and development cluster (R&D cluster), which represents approximately 10% of total R&D cluster expenditures for the year ended June 30, 2022. As a pass-through entity, Lehigh University?s Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) is responsible for monitoring the activities and compliance of its subrecipients. Monitoring includes reviewing the compliance audit reports from its subrecipients as they become available through the federal audit clearinghouse to ascertain the existence of non-compliance and appropriate follow-up with the subrecipient to ensure timely and appropriate corrective action is taken to remediate the finding(s). Our procedures performed determined that the Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) did not complete the review of their compliance reports within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Cause and Effect The ORSP lost two full time personnel in summer of 2020, one of whom was responsible for the review of the subrecipient compliance reports and issuing the management decision for any audit findings. That position was not filled until the December 2021 and no one else in ORSP completed these reviews during this timeframe. The lack of monitoring subrecipients timely could result in continuing to pass-through federal monies to a subrecipient who is not in compliance with federal compliance. Noncompliance by a subrecipient that is not identified and addressed timely could jeopardize the University?s receipt of future federal awards and public reputation. Questioned Costs No questioned costs were identified. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding Yes, finding 2021-001 Recommendation We recommend that Lehigh University strengthen its processes and controls to ensure the review of its subrecipient?s compliance reports is completed within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Views of Responsible Officials Lehigh University accepts this finding. The review of fiscal year 2022 has been conducted and is complete for the review of those institutions who have submitted their audit reports to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse.
Finding 2022-001 Federal Agency: Various Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Year: Programs active between July 1, 2021 ? June 30, 2022 Compliance requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Finding Type: Significant Deficiency Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must: Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward, and achieves performance goals. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: ? Reviewing financial and programmatic (performance and special reports) required by the pass-through entity (PTE). ? Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means. ? Issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE as required by 2 CFR section 200.521. ? The pass-through entity is responsible for resolving audit findings specifically related to the subaward and not responsible for resolving crosscutting findings. If a subrecipient has a current Single Audit report posted in the Federal Audit Clearinghouse and has not otherwise been excluded from receipt of Federal funding (e.g., has been debarred or suspended), the pass-through entity may rely on the subrecipient?s cognizant audit agency or cognizant oversight agency to perform audit follow-up and make management decisions related to cross-cutting findings in accordance with section 2 CFR 200.513(a)(3)(vii). Such reliance does not eliminate the responsibility of the pass-through entity to issue subawards that conform to agency and award-specific requirements, to manage risk through ongoing subaward monitoring, and to monitor the status of the findings that are specifically related to the subaward. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of 2 CFR 200.500 when it is expected that the subrecipient?s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in 2 CFR 200.501. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.521(c) and (d): the pass-through entity must be responsible for issuing a management decision for audit findings that relate to Federal awards it makes to subrecipients. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity responsible for issuing a management decision must do so within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the Federal Audit Clearinghouse (FAC). In accordance with 2 CFR 200.501(h), since 2 CFR Part 200 does not make Subpart F applicable to for-profit subrecipients, the PTE is responsible for establishing requirements, as necessary, to ensure compliance by for-profit subrecipients for the subaward. The agreement with the for-profit subrecipient must describe applicable compliance requirements and the for-profit subrecipient?s compliance responsibility. Methods to ensure compliance for federal awards made to for-profit subrecipients may include pre-award audits, monitoring during the agreement, and post-award audits. Condition, including Perspective Lehigh University passed through $3,277,289 to its subrecipients in the research and development cluster (R&D cluster), which represents approximately 10% of total R&D cluster expenditures for the year ended June 30, 2022. As a pass-through entity, Lehigh University?s Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) is responsible for monitoring the activities and compliance of its subrecipients. Monitoring includes reviewing the compliance audit reports from its subrecipients as they become available through the federal audit clearinghouse to ascertain the existence of non-compliance and appropriate follow-up with the subrecipient to ensure timely and appropriate corrective action is taken to remediate the finding(s). Our procedures performed determined that the Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) did not complete the review of their compliance reports within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Cause and Effect The ORSP lost two full time personnel in summer of 2020, one of whom was responsible for the review of the subrecipient compliance reports and issuing the management decision for any audit findings. That position was not filled until the December 2021 and no one else in ORSP completed these reviews during this timeframe. The lack of monitoring subrecipients timely could result in continuing to pass-through federal monies to a subrecipient who is not in compliance with federal compliance. Noncompliance by a subrecipient that is not identified and addressed timely could jeopardize the University?s receipt of future federal awards and public reputation. Questioned Costs No questioned costs were identified. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding Yes, finding 2021-001 Recommendation We recommend that Lehigh University strengthen its processes and controls to ensure the review of its subrecipient?s compliance reports is completed within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Views of Responsible Officials Lehigh University accepts this finding. The review of fiscal year 2022 has been conducted and is complete for the review of those institutions who have submitted their audit reports to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse.
Finding 2022-001 Federal Agency: Various Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Year: Programs active between July 1, 2021 ? June 30, 2022 Compliance requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Finding Type: Significant Deficiency Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must: Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward, and achieves performance goals. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: ? Reviewing financial and programmatic (performance and special reports) required by the pass-through entity (PTE). ? Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means. ? Issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE as required by 2 CFR section 200.521. ? The pass-through entity is responsible for resolving audit findings specifically related to the subaward and not responsible for resolving crosscutting findings. If a subrecipient has a current Single Audit report posted in the Federal Audit Clearinghouse and has not otherwise been excluded from receipt of Federal funding (e.g., has been debarred or suspended), the pass-through entity may rely on the subrecipient?s cognizant audit agency or cognizant oversight agency to perform audit follow-up and make management decisions related to cross-cutting findings in accordance with section 2 CFR 200.513(a)(3)(vii). Such reliance does not eliminate the responsibility of the pass-through entity to issue subawards that conform to agency and award-specific requirements, to manage risk through ongoing subaward monitoring, and to monitor the status of the findings that are specifically related to the subaward. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of 2 CFR 200.500 when it is expected that the subrecipient?s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in 2 CFR 200.501. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.521(c) and (d): the pass-through entity must be responsible for issuing a management decision for audit findings that relate to Federal awards it makes to subrecipients. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity responsible for issuing a management decision must do so within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the Federal Audit Clearinghouse (FAC). In accordance with 2 CFR 200.501(h), since 2 CFR Part 200 does not make Subpart F applicable to for-profit subrecipients, the PTE is responsible for establishing requirements, as necessary, to ensure compliance by for-profit subrecipients for the subaward. The agreement with the for-profit subrecipient must describe applicable compliance requirements and the for-profit subrecipient?s compliance responsibility. Methods to ensure compliance for federal awards made to for-profit subrecipients may include pre-award audits, monitoring during the agreement, and post-award audits. Condition, including Perspective Lehigh University passed through $3,277,289 to its subrecipients in the research and development cluster (R&D cluster), which represents approximately 10% of total R&D cluster expenditures for the year ended June 30, 2022. As a pass-through entity, Lehigh University?s Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) is responsible for monitoring the activities and compliance of its subrecipients. Monitoring includes reviewing the compliance audit reports from its subrecipients as they become available through the federal audit clearinghouse to ascertain the existence of non-compliance and appropriate follow-up with the subrecipient to ensure timely and appropriate corrective action is taken to remediate the finding(s). Our procedures performed determined that the Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) did not complete the review of their compliance reports within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Cause and Effect The ORSP lost two full time personnel in summer of 2020, one of whom was responsible for the review of the subrecipient compliance reports and issuing the management decision for any audit findings. That position was not filled until the December 2021 and no one else in ORSP completed these reviews during this timeframe. The lack of monitoring subrecipients timely could result in continuing to pass-through federal monies to a subrecipient who is not in compliance with federal compliance. Noncompliance by a subrecipient that is not identified and addressed timely could jeopardize the University?s receipt of future federal awards and public reputation. Questioned Costs No questioned costs were identified. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding Yes, finding 2021-001 Recommendation We recommend that Lehigh University strengthen its processes and controls to ensure the review of its subrecipient?s compliance reports is completed within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Views of Responsible Officials Lehigh University accepts this finding. The review of fiscal year 2022 has been conducted and is complete for the review of those institutions who have submitted their audit reports to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse.
Finding 2022-001 Federal Agency: Various Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Year: Programs active between July 1, 2021 ? June 30, 2022 Compliance requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Finding Type: Significant Deficiency Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must: Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward, and achieves performance goals. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: ? Reviewing financial and programmatic (performance and special reports) required by the pass-through entity (PTE). ? Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means. ? Issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE as required by 2 CFR section 200.521. ? The pass-through entity is responsible for resolving audit findings specifically related to the subaward and not responsible for resolving crosscutting findings. If a subrecipient has a current Single Audit report posted in the Federal Audit Clearinghouse and has not otherwise been excluded from receipt of Federal funding (e.g., has been debarred or suspended), the pass-through entity may rely on the subrecipient?s cognizant audit agency or cognizant oversight agency to perform audit follow-up and make management decisions related to cross-cutting findings in accordance with section 2 CFR 200.513(a)(3)(vii). Such reliance does not eliminate the responsibility of the pass-through entity to issue subawards that conform to agency and award-specific requirements, to manage risk through ongoing subaward monitoring, and to monitor the status of the findings that are specifically related to the subaward. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of 2 CFR 200.500 when it is expected that the subrecipient?s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in 2 CFR 200.501. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.521(c) and (d): the pass-through entity must be responsible for issuing a management decision for audit findings that relate to Federal awards it makes to subrecipients. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity responsible for issuing a management decision must do so within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the Federal Audit Clearinghouse (FAC). In accordance with 2 CFR 200.501(h), since 2 CFR Part 200 does not make Subpart F applicable to for-profit subrecipients, the PTE is responsible for establishing requirements, as necessary, to ensure compliance by for-profit subrecipients for the subaward. The agreement with the for-profit subrecipient must describe applicable compliance requirements and the for-profit subrecipient?s compliance responsibility. Methods to ensure compliance for federal awards made to for-profit subrecipients may include pre-award audits, monitoring during the agreement, and post-award audits. Condition, including Perspective Lehigh University passed through $3,277,289 to its subrecipients in the research and development cluster (R&D cluster), which represents approximately 10% of total R&D cluster expenditures for the year ended June 30, 2022. As a pass-through entity, Lehigh University?s Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) is responsible for monitoring the activities and compliance of its subrecipients. Monitoring includes reviewing the compliance audit reports from its subrecipients as they become available through the federal audit clearinghouse to ascertain the existence of non-compliance and appropriate follow-up with the subrecipient to ensure timely and appropriate corrective action is taken to remediate the finding(s). Our procedures performed determined that the Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) did not complete the review of their compliance reports within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Cause and Effect The ORSP lost two full time personnel in summer of 2020, one of whom was responsible for the review of the subrecipient compliance reports and issuing the management decision for any audit findings. That position was not filled until the December 2021 and no one else in ORSP completed these reviews during this timeframe. The lack of monitoring subrecipients timely could result in continuing to pass-through federal monies to a subrecipient who is not in compliance with federal compliance. Noncompliance by a subrecipient that is not identified and addressed timely could jeopardize the University?s receipt of future federal awards and public reputation. Questioned Costs No questioned costs were identified. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding Yes, finding 2021-001 Recommendation We recommend that Lehigh University strengthen its processes and controls to ensure the review of its subrecipient?s compliance reports is completed within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Views of Responsible Officials Lehigh University accepts this finding. The review of fiscal year 2022 has been conducted and is complete for the review of those institutions who have submitted their audit reports to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse.
Finding 2022-001 Federal Agency: Various Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Year: Programs active between July 1, 2021 ? June 30, 2022 Compliance requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Finding Type: Significant Deficiency Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must: Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward, and achieves performance goals. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: ? Reviewing financial and programmatic (performance and special reports) required by the pass-through entity (PTE). ? Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means. ? Issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE as required by 2 CFR section 200.521. ? The pass-through entity is responsible for resolving audit findings specifically related to the subaward and not responsible for resolving crosscutting findings. If a subrecipient has a current Single Audit report posted in the Federal Audit Clearinghouse and has not otherwise been excluded from receipt of Federal funding (e.g., has been debarred or suspended), the pass-through entity may rely on the subrecipient?s cognizant audit agency or cognizant oversight agency to perform audit follow-up and make management decisions related to cross-cutting findings in accordance with section 2 CFR 200.513(a)(3)(vii). Such reliance does not eliminate the responsibility of the pass-through entity to issue subawards that conform to agency and award-specific requirements, to manage risk through ongoing subaward monitoring, and to monitor the status of the findings that are specifically related to the subaward. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of 2 CFR 200.500 when it is expected that the subrecipient?s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in 2 CFR 200.501. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.521(c) and (d): the pass-through entity must be responsible for issuing a management decision for audit findings that relate to Federal awards it makes to subrecipients. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity responsible for issuing a management decision must do so within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the Federal Audit Clearinghouse (FAC). In accordance with 2 CFR 200.501(h), since 2 CFR Part 200 does not make Subpart F applicable to for-profit subrecipients, the PTE is responsible for establishing requirements, as necessary, to ensure compliance by for-profit subrecipients for the subaward. The agreement with the for-profit subrecipient must describe applicable compliance requirements and the for-profit subrecipient?s compliance responsibility. Methods to ensure compliance for federal awards made to for-profit subrecipients may include pre-award audits, monitoring during the agreement, and post-award audits. Condition, including Perspective Lehigh University passed through $3,277,289 to its subrecipients in the research and development cluster (R&D cluster), which represents approximately 10% of total R&D cluster expenditures for the year ended June 30, 2022. As a pass-through entity, Lehigh University?s Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) is responsible for monitoring the activities and compliance of its subrecipients. Monitoring includes reviewing the compliance audit reports from its subrecipients as they become available through the federal audit clearinghouse to ascertain the existence of non-compliance and appropriate follow-up with the subrecipient to ensure timely and appropriate corrective action is taken to remediate the finding(s). Our procedures performed determined that the Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) did not complete the review of their compliance reports within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Cause and Effect The ORSP lost two full time personnel in summer of 2020, one of whom was responsible for the review of the subrecipient compliance reports and issuing the management decision for any audit findings. That position was not filled until the December 2021 and no one else in ORSP completed these reviews during this timeframe. The lack of monitoring subrecipients timely could result in continuing to pass-through federal monies to a subrecipient who is not in compliance with federal compliance. Noncompliance by a subrecipient that is not identified and addressed timely could jeopardize the University?s receipt of future federal awards and public reputation. Questioned Costs No questioned costs were identified. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding Yes, finding 2021-001 Recommendation We recommend that Lehigh University strengthen its processes and controls to ensure the review of its subrecipient?s compliance reports is completed within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Views of Responsible Officials Lehigh University accepts this finding. The review of fiscal year 2022 has been conducted and is complete for the review of those institutions who have submitted their audit reports to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse.
Finding 2022-001 Federal Agency: Various Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Year: Programs active between July 1, 2021 ? June 30, 2022 Compliance requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Finding Type: Significant Deficiency Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must: Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward, and achieves performance goals. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: ? Reviewing financial and programmatic (performance and special reports) required by the pass-through entity (PTE). ? Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means. ? Issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE as required by 2 CFR section 200.521. ? The pass-through entity is responsible for resolving audit findings specifically related to the subaward and not responsible for resolving crosscutting findings. If a subrecipient has a current Single Audit report posted in the Federal Audit Clearinghouse and has not otherwise been excluded from receipt of Federal funding (e.g., has been debarred or suspended), the pass-through entity may rely on the subrecipient?s cognizant audit agency or cognizant oversight agency to perform audit follow-up and make management decisions related to cross-cutting findings in accordance with section 2 CFR 200.513(a)(3)(vii). Such reliance does not eliminate the responsibility of the pass-through entity to issue subawards that conform to agency and award-specific requirements, to manage risk through ongoing subaward monitoring, and to monitor the status of the findings that are specifically related to the subaward. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of 2 CFR 200.500 when it is expected that the subrecipient?s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in 2 CFR 200.501. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.521(c) and (d): the pass-through entity must be responsible for issuing a management decision for audit findings that relate to Federal awards it makes to subrecipients. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity responsible for issuing a management decision must do so within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the Federal Audit Clearinghouse (FAC). In accordance with 2 CFR 200.501(h), since 2 CFR Part 200 does not make Subpart F applicable to for-profit subrecipients, the PTE is responsible for establishing requirements, as necessary, to ensure compliance by for-profit subrecipients for the subaward. The agreement with the for-profit subrecipient must describe applicable compliance requirements and the for-profit subrecipient?s compliance responsibility. Methods to ensure compliance for federal awards made to for-profit subrecipients may include pre-award audits, monitoring during the agreement, and post-award audits. Condition, including Perspective Lehigh University passed through $3,277,289 to its subrecipients in the research and development cluster (R&D cluster), which represents approximately 10% of total R&D cluster expenditures for the year ended June 30, 2022. As a pass-through entity, Lehigh University?s Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) is responsible for monitoring the activities and compliance of its subrecipients. Monitoring includes reviewing the compliance audit reports from its subrecipients as they become available through the federal audit clearinghouse to ascertain the existence of non-compliance and appropriate follow-up with the subrecipient to ensure timely and appropriate corrective action is taken to remediate the finding(s). Our procedures performed determined that the Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) did not complete the review of their compliance reports within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Cause and Effect The ORSP lost two full time personnel in summer of 2020, one of whom was responsible for the review of the subrecipient compliance reports and issuing the management decision for any audit findings. That position was not filled until the December 2021 and no one else in ORSP completed these reviews during this timeframe. The lack of monitoring subrecipients timely could result in continuing to pass-through federal monies to a subrecipient who is not in compliance with federal compliance. Noncompliance by a subrecipient that is not identified and addressed timely could jeopardize the University?s receipt of future federal awards and public reputation. Questioned Costs No questioned costs were identified. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding Yes, finding 2021-001 Recommendation We recommend that Lehigh University strengthen its processes and controls to ensure the review of its subrecipient?s compliance reports is completed within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Views of Responsible Officials Lehigh University accepts this finding. The review of fiscal year 2022 has been conducted and is complete for the review of those institutions who have submitted their audit reports to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse.
Finding 2022-001 Federal Agency: Various Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Year: Programs active between July 1, 2021 ? June 30, 2022 Compliance requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Finding Type: Significant Deficiency Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must: Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward, and achieves performance goals. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: ? Reviewing financial and programmatic (performance and special reports) required by the pass-through entity (PTE). ? Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means. ? Issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE as required by 2 CFR section 200.521. ? The pass-through entity is responsible for resolving audit findings specifically related to the subaward and not responsible for resolving crosscutting findings. If a subrecipient has a current Single Audit report posted in the Federal Audit Clearinghouse and has not otherwise been excluded from receipt of Federal funding (e.g., has been debarred or suspended), the pass-through entity may rely on the subrecipient?s cognizant audit agency or cognizant oversight agency to perform audit follow-up and make management decisions related to cross-cutting findings in accordance with section 2 CFR 200.513(a)(3)(vii). Such reliance does not eliminate the responsibility of the pass-through entity to issue subawards that conform to agency and award-specific requirements, to manage risk through ongoing subaward monitoring, and to monitor the status of the findings that are specifically related to the subaward. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of 2 CFR 200.500 when it is expected that the subrecipient?s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in 2 CFR 200.501. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.521(c) and (d): the pass-through entity must be responsible for issuing a management decision for audit findings that relate to Federal awards it makes to subrecipients. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity responsible for issuing a management decision must do so within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the Federal Audit Clearinghouse (FAC). In accordance with 2 CFR 200.501(h), since 2 CFR Part 200 does not make Subpart F applicable to for-profit subrecipients, the PTE is responsible for establishing requirements, as necessary, to ensure compliance by for-profit subrecipients for the subaward. The agreement with the for-profit subrecipient must describe applicable compliance requirements and the for-profit subrecipient?s compliance responsibility. Methods to ensure compliance for federal awards made to for-profit subrecipients may include pre-award audits, monitoring during the agreement, and post-award audits. Condition, including Perspective Lehigh University passed through $3,277,289 to its subrecipients in the research and development cluster (R&D cluster), which represents approximately 10% of total R&D cluster expenditures for the year ended June 30, 2022. As a pass-through entity, Lehigh University?s Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) is responsible for monitoring the activities and compliance of its subrecipients. Monitoring includes reviewing the compliance audit reports from its subrecipients as they become available through the federal audit clearinghouse to ascertain the existence of non-compliance and appropriate follow-up with the subrecipient to ensure timely and appropriate corrective action is taken to remediate the finding(s). Our procedures performed determined that the Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) did not complete the review of their compliance reports within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Cause and Effect The ORSP lost two full time personnel in summer of 2020, one of whom was responsible for the review of the subrecipient compliance reports and issuing the management decision for any audit findings. That position was not filled until the December 2021 and no one else in ORSP completed these reviews during this timeframe. The lack of monitoring subrecipients timely could result in continuing to pass-through federal monies to a subrecipient who is not in compliance with federal compliance. Noncompliance by a subrecipient that is not identified and addressed timely could jeopardize the University?s receipt of future federal awards and public reputation. Questioned Costs No questioned costs were identified. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding Yes, finding 2021-001 Recommendation We recommend that Lehigh University strengthen its processes and controls to ensure the review of its subrecipient?s compliance reports is completed within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Views of Responsible Officials Lehigh University accepts this finding. The review of fiscal year 2022 has been conducted and is complete for the review of those institutions who have submitted their audit reports to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse.
Finding 2022-001 Federal Agency: Various Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Year: Programs active between July 1, 2021 ? June 30, 2022 Compliance requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Finding Type: Significant Deficiency Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must: Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward, and achieves performance goals. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: ? Reviewing financial and programmatic (performance and special reports) required by the pass-through entity (PTE). ? Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means. ? Issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE as required by 2 CFR section 200.521. ? The pass-through entity is responsible for resolving audit findings specifically related to the subaward and not responsible for resolving crosscutting findings. If a subrecipient has a current Single Audit report posted in the Federal Audit Clearinghouse and has not otherwise been excluded from receipt of Federal funding (e.g., has been debarred or suspended), the pass-through entity may rely on the subrecipient?s cognizant audit agency or cognizant oversight agency to perform audit follow-up and make management decisions related to cross-cutting findings in accordance with section 2 CFR 200.513(a)(3)(vii). Such reliance does not eliminate the responsibility of the pass-through entity to issue subawards that conform to agency and award-specific requirements, to manage risk through ongoing subaward monitoring, and to monitor the status of the findings that are specifically related to the subaward. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of 2 CFR 200.500 when it is expected that the subrecipient?s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in 2 CFR 200.501. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.521(c) and (d): the pass-through entity must be responsible for issuing a management decision for audit findings that relate to Federal awards it makes to subrecipients. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity responsible for issuing a management decision must do so within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the Federal Audit Clearinghouse (FAC). In accordance with 2 CFR 200.501(h), since 2 CFR Part 200 does not make Subpart F applicable to for-profit subrecipients, the PTE is responsible for establishing requirements, as necessary, to ensure compliance by for-profit subrecipients for the subaward. The agreement with the for-profit subrecipient must describe applicable compliance requirements and the for-profit subrecipient?s compliance responsibility. Methods to ensure compliance for federal awards made to for-profit subrecipients may include pre-award audits, monitoring during the agreement, and post-award audits. Condition, including Perspective Lehigh University passed through $3,277,289 to its subrecipients in the research and development cluster (R&D cluster), which represents approximately 10% of total R&D cluster expenditures for the year ended June 30, 2022. As a pass-through entity, Lehigh University?s Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) is responsible for monitoring the activities and compliance of its subrecipients. Monitoring includes reviewing the compliance audit reports from its subrecipients as they become available through the federal audit clearinghouse to ascertain the existence of non-compliance and appropriate follow-up with the subrecipient to ensure timely and appropriate corrective action is taken to remediate the finding(s). Our procedures performed determined that the Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) did not complete the review of their compliance reports within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Cause and Effect The ORSP lost two full time personnel in summer of 2020, one of whom was responsible for the review of the subrecipient compliance reports and issuing the management decision for any audit findings. That position was not filled until the December 2021 and no one else in ORSP completed these reviews during this timeframe. The lack of monitoring subrecipients timely could result in continuing to pass-through federal monies to a subrecipient who is not in compliance with federal compliance. Noncompliance by a subrecipient that is not identified and addressed timely could jeopardize the University?s receipt of future federal awards and public reputation. Questioned Costs No questioned costs were identified. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding Yes, finding 2021-001 Recommendation We recommend that Lehigh University strengthen its processes and controls to ensure the review of its subrecipient?s compliance reports is completed within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Views of Responsible Officials Lehigh University accepts this finding. The review of fiscal year 2022 has been conducted and is complete for the review of those institutions who have submitted their audit reports to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse.
Finding 2022-001 Federal Agency: Various Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Year: Programs active between July 1, 2021 ? June 30, 2022 Compliance requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Finding Type: Significant Deficiency Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must: Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward, and achieves performance goals. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: ? Reviewing financial and programmatic (performance and special reports) required by the pass-through entity (PTE). ? Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means. ? Issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE as required by 2 CFR section 200.521. ? The pass-through entity is responsible for resolving audit findings specifically related to the subaward and not responsible for resolving crosscutting findings. If a subrecipient has a current Single Audit report posted in the Federal Audit Clearinghouse and has not otherwise been excluded from receipt of Federal funding (e.g., has been debarred or suspended), the pass-through entity may rely on the subrecipient?s cognizant audit agency or cognizant oversight agency to perform audit follow-up and make management decisions related to cross-cutting findings in accordance with section 2 CFR 200.513(a)(3)(vii). Such reliance does not eliminate the responsibility of the pass-through entity to issue subawards that conform to agency and award-specific requirements, to manage risk through ongoing subaward monitoring, and to monitor the status of the findings that are specifically related to the subaward. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of 2 CFR 200.500 when it is expected that the subrecipient?s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in 2 CFR 200.501. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.521(c) and (d): the pass-through entity must be responsible for issuing a management decision for audit findings that relate to Federal awards it makes to subrecipients. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity responsible for issuing a management decision must do so within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the Federal Audit Clearinghouse (FAC). In accordance with 2 CFR 200.501(h), since 2 CFR Part 200 does not make Subpart F applicable to for-profit subrecipients, the PTE is responsible for establishing requirements, as necessary, to ensure compliance by for-profit subrecipients for the subaward. The agreement with the for-profit subrecipient must describe applicable compliance requirements and the for-profit subrecipient?s compliance responsibility. Methods to ensure compliance for federal awards made to for-profit subrecipients may include pre-award audits, monitoring during the agreement, and post-award audits. Condition, including Perspective Lehigh University passed through $3,277,289 to its subrecipients in the research and development cluster (R&D cluster), which represents approximately 10% of total R&D cluster expenditures for the year ended June 30, 2022. As a pass-through entity, Lehigh University?s Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) is responsible for monitoring the activities and compliance of its subrecipients. Monitoring includes reviewing the compliance audit reports from its subrecipients as they become available through the federal audit clearinghouse to ascertain the existence of non-compliance and appropriate follow-up with the subrecipient to ensure timely and appropriate corrective action is taken to remediate the finding(s). Our procedures performed determined that the Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) did not complete the review of their compliance reports within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Cause and Effect The ORSP lost two full time personnel in summer of 2020, one of whom was responsible for the review of the subrecipient compliance reports and issuing the management decision for any audit findings. That position was not filled until the December 2021 and no one else in ORSP completed these reviews during this timeframe. The lack of monitoring subrecipients timely could result in continuing to pass-through federal monies to a subrecipient who is not in compliance with federal compliance. Noncompliance by a subrecipient that is not identified and addressed timely could jeopardize the University?s receipt of future federal awards and public reputation. Questioned Costs No questioned costs were identified. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding Yes, finding 2021-001 Recommendation We recommend that Lehigh University strengthen its processes and controls to ensure the review of its subrecipient?s compliance reports is completed within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Views of Responsible Officials Lehigh University accepts this finding. The review of fiscal year 2022 has been conducted and is complete for the review of those institutions who have submitted their audit reports to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse.
Finding 2022-001 Federal Agency: Various Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Year: Programs active between July 1, 2021 ? June 30, 2022 Compliance requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Finding Type: Significant Deficiency Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must: Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward, and achieves performance goals. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: ? Reviewing financial and programmatic (performance and special reports) required by the pass-through entity (PTE). ? Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means. ? Issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE as required by 2 CFR section 200.521. ? The pass-through entity is responsible for resolving audit findings specifically related to the subaward and not responsible for resolving crosscutting findings. If a subrecipient has a current Single Audit report posted in the Federal Audit Clearinghouse and has not otherwise been excluded from receipt of Federal funding (e.g., has been debarred or suspended), the pass-through entity may rely on the subrecipient?s cognizant audit agency or cognizant oversight agency to perform audit follow-up and make management decisions related to cross-cutting findings in accordance with section 2 CFR 200.513(a)(3)(vii). Such reliance does not eliminate the responsibility of the pass-through entity to issue subawards that conform to agency and award-specific requirements, to manage risk through ongoing subaward monitoring, and to monitor the status of the findings that are specifically related to the subaward. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of 2 CFR 200.500 when it is expected that the subrecipient?s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in 2 CFR 200.501. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.521(c) and (d): the pass-through entity must be responsible for issuing a management decision for audit findings that relate to Federal awards it makes to subrecipients. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity responsible for issuing a management decision must do so within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the Federal Audit Clearinghouse (FAC). In accordance with 2 CFR 200.501(h), since 2 CFR Part 200 does not make Subpart F applicable to for-profit subrecipients, the PTE is responsible for establishing requirements, as necessary, to ensure compliance by for-profit subrecipients for the subaward. The agreement with the for-profit subrecipient must describe applicable compliance requirements and the for-profit subrecipient?s compliance responsibility. Methods to ensure compliance for federal awards made to for-profit subrecipients may include pre-award audits, monitoring during the agreement, and post-award audits. Condition, including Perspective Lehigh University passed through $3,277,289 to its subrecipients in the research and development cluster (R&D cluster), which represents approximately 10% of total R&D cluster expenditures for the year ended June 30, 2022. As a pass-through entity, Lehigh University?s Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) is responsible for monitoring the activities and compliance of its subrecipients. Monitoring includes reviewing the compliance audit reports from its subrecipients as they become available through the federal audit clearinghouse to ascertain the existence of non-compliance and appropriate follow-up with the subrecipient to ensure timely and appropriate corrective action is taken to remediate the finding(s). Our procedures performed determined that the Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) did not complete the review of their compliance reports within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Cause and Effect The ORSP lost two full time personnel in summer of 2020, one of whom was responsible for the review of the subrecipient compliance reports and issuing the management decision for any audit findings. That position was not filled until the December 2021 and no one else in ORSP completed these reviews during this timeframe. The lack of monitoring subrecipients timely could result in continuing to pass-through federal monies to a subrecipient who is not in compliance with federal compliance. Noncompliance by a subrecipient that is not identified and addressed timely could jeopardize the University?s receipt of future federal awards and public reputation. Questioned Costs No questioned costs were identified. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding Yes, finding 2021-001 Recommendation We recommend that Lehigh University strengthen its processes and controls to ensure the review of its subrecipient?s compliance reports is completed within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Views of Responsible Officials Lehigh University accepts this finding. The review of fiscal year 2022 has been conducted and is complete for the review of those institutions who have submitted their audit reports to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse.
Finding 2022-001 Federal Agency: Various Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Year: Programs active between July 1, 2021 ? June 30, 2022 Compliance requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Finding Type: Significant Deficiency Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must: Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward, and achieves performance goals. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: ? Reviewing financial and programmatic (performance and special reports) required by the pass-through entity (PTE). ? Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means. ? Issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE as required by 2 CFR section 200.521. ? The pass-through entity is responsible for resolving audit findings specifically related to the subaward and not responsible for resolving crosscutting findings. If a subrecipient has a current Single Audit report posted in the Federal Audit Clearinghouse and has not otherwise been excluded from receipt of Federal funding (e.g., has been debarred or suspended), the pass-through entity may rely on the subrecipient?s cognizant audit agency or cognizant oversight agency to perform audit follow-up and make management decisions related to cross-cutting findings in accordance with section 2 CFR 200.513(a)(3)(vii). Such reliance does not eliminate the responsibility of the pass-through entity to issue subawards that conform to agency and award-specific requirements, to manage risk through ongoing subaward monitoring, and to monitor the status of the findings that are specifically related to the subaward. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of 2 CFR 200.500 when it is expected that the subrecipient?s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in 2 CFR 200.501. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.521(c) and (d): the pass-through entity must be responsible for issuing a management decision for audit findings that relate to Federal awards it makes to subrecipients. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity responsible for issuing a management decision must do so within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the Federal Audit Clearinghouse (FAC). In accordance with 2 CFR 200.501(h), since 2 CFR Part 200 does not make Subpart F applicable to for-profit subrecipients, the PTE is responsible for establishing requirements, as necessary, to ensure compliance by for-profit subrecipients for the subaward. The agreement with the for-profit subrecipient must describe applicable compliance requirements and the for-profit subrecipient?s compliance responsibility. Methods to ensure compliance for federal awards made to for-profit subrecipients may include pre-award audits, monitoring during the agreement, and post-award audits. Condition, including Perspective Lehigh University passed through $3,277,289 to its subrecipients in the research and development cluster (R&D cluster), which represents approximately 10% of total R&D cluster expenditures for the year ended June 30, 2022. As a pass-through entity, Lehigh University?s Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) is responsible for monitoring the activities and compliance of its subrecipients. Monitoring includes reviewing the compliance audit reports from its subrecipients as they become available through the federal audit clearinghouse to ascertain the existence of non-compliance and appropriate follow-up with the subrecipient to ensure timely and appropriate corrective action is taken to remediate the finding(s). Our procedures performed determined that the Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) did not complete the review of their compliance reports within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Cause and Effect The ORSP lost two full time personnel in summer of 2020, one of whom was responsible for the review of the subrecipient compliance reports and issuing the management decision for any audit findings. That position was not filled until the December 2021 and no one else in ORSP completed these reviews during this timeframe. The lack of monitoring subrecipients timely could result in continuing to pass-through federal monies to a subrecipient who is not in compliance with federal compliance. Noncompliance by a subrecipient that is not identified and addressed timely could jeopardize the University?s receipt of future federal awards and public reputation. Questioned Costs No questioned costs were identified. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding Yes, finding 2021-001 Recommendation We recommend that Lehigh University strengthen its processes and controls to ensure the review of its subrecipient?s compliance reports is completed within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Views of Responsible Officials Lehigh University accepts this finding. The review of fiscal year 2022 has been conducted and is complete for the review of those institutions who have submitted their audit reports to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse.
Finding 2022-001 Federal Agency: Various Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Year: Programs active between July 1, 2021 ? June 30, 2022 Compliance requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Finding Type: Significant Deficiency Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must: Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward, and achieves performance goals. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: ? Reviewing financial and programmatic (performance and special reports) required by the pass-through entity (PTE). ? Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means. ? Issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE as required by 2 CFR section 200.521. ? The pass-through entity is responsible for resolving audit findings specifically related to the subaward and not responsible for resolving crosscutting findings. If a subrecipient has a current Single Audit report posted in the Federal Audit Clearinghouse and has not otherwise been excluded from receipt of Federal funding (e.g., has been debarred or suspended), the pass-through entity may rely on the subrecipient?s cognizant audit agency or cognizant oversight agency to perform audit follow-up and make management decisions related to cross-cutting findings in accordance with section 2 CFR 200.513(a)(3)(vii). Such reliance does not eliminate the responsibility of the pass-through entity to issue subawards that conform to agency and award-specific requirements, to manage risk through ongoing subaward monitoring, and to monitor the status of the findings that are specifically related to the subaward. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of 2 CFR 200.500 when it is expected that the subrecipient?s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in 2 CFR 200.501. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.521(c) and (d): the pass-through entity must be responsible for issuing a management decision for audit findings that relate to Federal awards it makes to subrecipients. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity responsible for issuing a management decision must do so within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the Federal Audit Clearinghouse (FAC). In accordance with 2 CFR 200.501(h), since 2 CFR Part 200 does not make Subpart F applicable to for-profit subrecipients, the PTE is responsible for establishing requirements, as necessary, to ensure compliance by for-profit subrecipients for the subaward. The agreement with the for-profit subrecipient must describe applicable compliance requirements and the for-profit subrecipient?s compliance responsibility. Methods to ensure compliance for federal awards made to for-profit subrecipients may include pre-award audits, monitoring during the agreement, and post-award audits. Condition, including Perspective Lehigh University passed through $3,277,289 to its subrecipients in the research and development cluster (R&D cluster), which represents approximately 10% of total R&D cluster expenditures for the year ended June 30, 2022. As a pass-through entity, Lehigh University?s Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) is responsible for monitoring the activities and compliance of its subrecipients. Monitoring includes reviewing the compliance audit reports from its subrecipients as they become available through the federal audit clearinghouse to ascertain the existence of non-compliance and appropriate follow-up with the subrecipient to ensure timely and appropriate corrective action is taken to remediate the finding(s). Our procedures performed determined that the Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) did not complete the review of their compliance reports within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Cause and Effect The ORSP lost two full time personnel in summer of 2020, one of whom was responsible for the review of the subrecipient compliance reports and issuing the management decision for any audit findings. That position was not filled until the December 2021 and no one else in ORSP completed these reviews during this timeframe. The lack of monitoring subrecipients timely could result in continuing to pass-through federal monies to a subrecipient who is not in compliance with federal compliance. Noncompliance by a subrecipient that is not identified and addressed timely could jeopardize the University?s receipt of future federal awards and public reputation. Questioned Costs No questioned costs were identified. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding Yes, finding 2021-001 Recommendation We recommend that Lehigh University strengthen its processes and controls to ensure the review of its subrecipient?s compliance reports is completed within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Views of Responsible Officials Lehigh University accepts this finding. The review of fiscal year 2022 has been conducted and is complete for the review of those institutions who have submitted their audit reports to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse.
Subrecipient Monitoring Material Weakness Material Noncompliance 2022-023 Strengthen Controls to Ensure Compliance with Subrecipient Monitoring Requirements. ALN Number 17.258, 17.259, 17.278- Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act Federal Award No. NIA Federal Agency Department of Labor Pass-through Entity NI A Questioned Costs NI A Criteria Code of Federal Regulations (2 CFR ?200.332(f)) states all pass-through entities (PTE?s) must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F - Audit Requirements when it is expected that the subrecipient's Federal awards expended during the fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold?a non- Federal entity that expends $750,000 or more during the non-Federal entity?s fiscal year in Federal awards must have a single audit conducted?set forth in ? 200.501 Audit requirements. Code of Federal Regulations 2 CFR 200.332 (d) states to monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved. Sec. 184(a)(4) of the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act states the State must conduct an annual on-site monitoring review of each local area?s compliance with 2 CFR part 200. Code of Federal Regulations 2 CFR 200.332 (e) states depending upon the passthrough entity's assessment of risk posed by the subrecipient (as described in paragraph (b) of this section), the following monitoring tools may be useful for the pass-through entity to ensure proper accountability and compliance with program requirements and achievement of performance goals: (1) Providing subrecipients with training and technical assistance on program-related matters; and (2) Performing on-site reviews of the subrecipient's program operations; (3) Arranging for agreed-upon-procedures engagements as described in ? 200.425. Condition The Mississippi Department of Employment Security (MDES) does not efficiently or effectively review the required federal audits for Subrecipient Monitoring Requirements per 2 CFR 200.332 (f). For three out of thirteen subrecipients the agency did not maintain or provide the correct Single Audit or the determination if a Single Audit was required when requested. MDES does not appropriately ensure on-site monitoring is done in a timely manner. During review of ten subrecipients, auditor noted that all documented monitoring was done after the fiscal year was complete, the monitoring was not completed on-site, and the reports for the monitoring were provided back to the agency after the fiscal year was complete. Per discussion with agency personnel, a pre-award scoring is being performed to determine ability of the subrecipient to enact the grant, however a risk based assessment to ensure the subrecipient has proper accountability with the award is not being performed. Cause Staff did not follow policies and procedures for subrecipient on-site monitoring requirements. Effect Subrecipients could be in noncompliance with 2 CFR ? 200.501, Audit requirements, and go undetected by MDES. In addition, MDES could lose federal funding for not properly monitoring their subrecipients. Without proper monitoring of their federal reports, subrecipients may participate in unallowable activities that goes undetected by MDES, the grantor. Recommendation We recommend that the Mississippi Department Employment Security strengthen controls to ensure compliance with the Subrecipient Monitoring requirements. Repeat Finding No. Statistically Valid No.
Subrecipient Monitoring Material Weakness Material Noncompliance 2022-023 Strengthen Controls to Ensure Compliance with Subrecipient Monitoring Requirements. ALN Number 17.258, 17.259, 17.278- Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act Federal Award No. NIA Federal Agency Department of Labor Pass-through Entity NI A Questioned Costs NI A Criteria Code of Federal Regulations (2 CFR ?200.332(f)) states all pass-through entities (PTE?s) must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F - Audit Requirements when it is expected that the subrecipient's Federal awards expended during the fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold?a non- Federal entity that expends $750,000 or more during the non-Federal entity?s fiscal year in Federal awards must have a single audit conducted?set forth in ? 200.501 Audit requirements. Code of Federal Regulations 2 CFR 200.332 (d) states to monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved. Sec. 184(a)(4) of the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act states the State must conduct an annual on-site monitoring review of each local area?s compliance with 2 CFR part 200. Code of Federal Regulations 2 CFR 200.332 (e) states depending upon the passthrough entity's assessment of risk posed by the subrecipient (as described in paragraph (b) of this section), the following monitoring tools may be useful for the pass-through entity to ensure proper accountability and compliance with program requirements and achievement of performance goals: (1) Providing subrecipients with training and technical assistance on program-related matters; and (2) Performing on-site reviews of the subrecipient's program operations; (3) Arranging for agreed-upon-procedures engagements as described in ? 200.425. Condition The Mississippi Department of Employment Security (MDES) does not efficiently or effectively review the required federal audits for Subrecipient Monitoring Requirements per 2 CFR 200.332 (f). For three out of thirteen subrecipients the agency did not maintain or provide the correct Single Audit or the determination if a Single Audit was required when requested. MDES does not appropriately ensure on-site monitoring is done in a timely manner. During review of ten subrecipients, auditor noted that all documented monitoring was done after the fiscal year was complete, the monitoring was not completed on-site, and the reports for the monitoring were provided back to the agency after the fiscal year was complete. Per discussion with agency personnel, a pre-award scoring is being performed to determine ability of the subrecipient to enact the grant, however a risk based assessment to ensure the subrecipient has proper accountability with the award is not being performed. Cause Staff did not follow policies and procedures for subrecipient on-site monitoring requirements. Effect Subrecipients could be in noncompliance with 2 CFR ? 200.501, Audit requirements, and go undetected by MDES. In addition, MDES could lose federal funding for not properly monitoring their subrecipients. Without proper monitoring of their federal reports, subrecipients may participate in unallowable activities that goes undetected by MDES, the grantor. Recommendation We recommend that the Mississippi Department Employment Security strengthen controls to ensure compliance with the Subrecipient Monitoring requirements. Repeat Finding No. Statistically Valid No.
Subrecipient Monitoring Material Weakness Material Noncompliance 2022-023 Strengthen Controls to Ensure Compliance with Subrecipient Monitoring Requirements. ALN Number 17.258, 17.259, 17.278- Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act Federal Award No. NIA Federal Agency Department of Labor Pass-through Entity NI A Questioned Costs NI A Criteria Code of Federal Regulations (2 CFR ?200.332(f)) states all pass-through entities (PTE?s) must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F - Audit Requirements when it is expected that the subrecipient's Federal awards expended during the fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold?a non- Federal entity that expends $750,000 or more during the non-Federal entity?s fiscal year in Federal awards must have a single audit conducted?set forth in ? 200.501 Audit requirements. Code of Federal Regulations 2 CFR 200.332 (d) states to monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved. Sec. 184(a)(4) of the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act states the State must conduct an annual on-site monitoring review of each local area?s compliance with 2 CFR part 200. Code of Federal Regulations 2 CFR 200.332 (e) states depending upon the passthrough entity's assessment of risk posed by the subrecipient (as described in paragraph (b) of this section), the following monitoring tools may be useful for the pass-through entity to ensure proper accountability and compliance with program requirements and achievement of performance goals: (1) Providing subrecipients with training and technical assistance on program-related matters; and (2) Performing on-site reviews of the subrecipient's program operations; (3) Arranging for agreed-upon-procedures engagements as described in ? 200.425. Condition The Mississippi Department of Employment Security (MDES) does not efficiently or effectively review the required federal audits for Subrecipient Monitoring Requirements per 2 CFR 200.332 (f). For three out of thirteen subrecipients the agency did not maintain or provide the correct Single Audit or the determination if a Single Audit was required when requested. MDES does not appropriately ensure on-site monitoring is done in a timely manner. During review of ten subrecipients, auditor noted that all documented monitoring was done after the fiscal year was complete, the monitoring was not completed on-site, and the reports for the monitoring were provided back to the agency after the fiscal year was complete. Per discussion with agency personnel, a pre-award scoring is being performed to determine ability of the subrecipient to enact the grant, however a risk based assessment to ensure the subrecipient has proper accountability with the award is not being performed. Cause Staff did not follow policies and procedures for subrecipient on-site monitoring requirements. Effect Subrecipients could be in noncompliance with 2 CFR ? 200.501, Audit requirements, and go undetected by MDES. In addition, MDES could lose federal funding for not properly monitoring their subrecipients. Without proper monitoring of their federal reports, subrecipients may participate in unallowable activities that goes undetected by MDES, the grantor. Recommendation We recommend that the Mississippi Department Employment Security strengthen controls to ensure compliance with the Subrecipient Monitoring requirements. Repeat Finding No. Statistically Valid No.
Material Weakness Material Noncompliance 2022-018 Strengthen Controls over Subrecipient Monitoring to Ensure Compliance with Uniform Guidance Auditing Requirements. ALN Number 93.558 Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) 93.575, 93.596 Child Care Development Fund (CCDF) Federal Award No. G2001MSTANF G200 lMSCCDF Federal Agency Department of Health and Human Services Pass-through Entity NI A Questioned Costs None Criteria The Code of Federal Regulations (2 cfr ?200.331(/)) states all pass-through entities (PTE's) must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F - Audit Requirements of this part when it is expected that the subrecipient's Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in? 200.501 Audit requirements. The Code of Federal Regulations (2 cfr ? 200.512(a)(l)) states the audit must be completed and the data collection form described in paragraph (b) of this section and reporting package described in paragraph ( c) of this section must be submitted within the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor's report(s), or nine months after the end of the audit period. If the due date falls on a Saturday, Sunday, or Federal holiday, the reporting package is due the next business day. Additionally, per the MDHS Subgrant/ Agreement Manual: All MDHS subgrantees are required to complete the MDHS Subgrantee Audit Information Form (MDHS-DPI-002). This form must be submitted to the Division of Monitoring no later than ninety (90) calendar days after the end of the subgrantee's fiscal year. This form is necessary to certify the sources and amounts of all Federal awards received and expended by the subgrantee. Condition When performing testwork related to 0MB Single Audit Monitoring as of June 30, 2022, the auditor noted two instances in which the Mississippi Department of Human Services (MDHS) did not ascertain whether Single Audit Requirements were being met by subgrantees. Cause Failure to properly monitor subrecipients could allow noncompliance with federal regulations to occur and go undetected, potentially resulting in fraud, waste, and abuse within the agency. Effect Staff were either unaware or did not follow identified policies and procedures for monitoring requirements. Recommendation We recommend the Mississippi Department of Human Services' Office of Compliance - Division of Monitoring (DM) strengthen controls over subrecipient monitoring for Uniform Guidance audits to ensure recipients expending $750,000 or more in Federal funds during their fiscal year are meeting Uniform Guidance Audit requirements. Repeat Finding Yes, 2021-014; 2020-031 in 2020; 2019-043 in 2019; 2018-047 in 2018; 2017- 038 in 2017; 2016-028 in 2016; 2015-009 in 2015; and 2014-016 in 2014. Statistically Valid No.
Material Weakness Material Noncompliance 2022-018 Strengthen Controls over Subrecipient Monitoring to Ensure Compliance with Uniform Guidance Auditing Requirements. ALN Number 93.558 Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) 93.575, 93.596 Child Care Development Fund (CCDF) Federal Award No. G2001MSTANF G200 lMSCCDF Federal Agency Department of Health and Human Services Pass-through Entity NI A Questioned Costs None Criteria The Code of Federal Regulations (2 cfr ?200.331(/)) states all pass-through entities (PTE's) must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F - Audit Requirements of this part when it is expected that the subrecipient's Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in? 200.501 Audit requirements. The Code of Federal Regulations (2 cfr ? 200.512(a)(l)) states the audit must be completed and the data collection form described in paragraph (b) of this section and reporting package described in paragraph ( c) of this section must be submitted within the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor's report(s), or nine months after the end of the audit period. If the due date falls on a Saturday, Sunday, or Federal holiday, the reporting package is due the next business day. Additionally, per the MDHS Subgrant/ Agreement Manual: All MDHS subgrantees are required to complete the MDHS Subgrantee Audit Information Form (MDHS-DPI-002). This form must be submitted to the Division of Monitoring no later than ninety (90) calendar days after the end of the subgrantee's fiscal year. This form is necessary to certify the sources and amounts of all Federal awards received and expended by the subgrantee. Condition When performing testwork related to 0MB Single Audit Monitoring as of June 30, 2022, the auditor noted two instances in which the Mississippi Department of Human Services (MDHS) did not ascertain whether Single Audit Requirements were being met by subgrantees. Cause Failure to properly monitor subrecipients could allow noncompliance with federal regulations to occur and go undetected, potentially resulting in fraud, waste, and abuse within the agency. Effect Staff were either unaware or did not follow identified policies and procedures for monitoring requirements. Recommendation We recommend the Mississippi Department of Human Services' Office of Compliance - Division of Monitoring (DM) strengthen controls over subrecipient monitoring for Uniform Guidance audits to ensure recipients expending $750,000 or more in Federal funds during their fiscal year are meeting Uniform Guidance Audit requirements. Repeat Finding Yes, 2021-014; 2020-031 in 2020; 2019-043 in 2019; 2018-047 in 2018; 2017- 038 in 2017; 2016-028 in 2016; 2015-009 in 2015; and 2014-016 in 2014. Statistically Valid No.
Material Weakness Material Noncompliance 2022-018 Strengthen Controls over Subrecipient Monitoring to Ensure Compliance with Uniform Guidance Auditing Requirements. ALN Number 93.558 Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) 93.575, 93.596 Child Care Development Fund (CCDF) Federal Award No. G2001MSTANF G200 lMSCCDF Federal Agency Department of Health and Human Services Pass-through Entity NI A Questioned Costs None Criteria The Code of Federal Regulations (2 cfr ?200.331(/)) states all pass-through entities (PTE's) must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F - Audit Requirements of this part when it is expected that the subrecipient's Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in? 200.501 Audit requirements. The Code of Federal Regulations (2 cfr ? 200.512(a)(l)) states the audit must be completed and the data collection form described in paragraph (b) of this section and reporting package described in paragraph ( c) of this section must be submitted within the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor's report(s), or nine months after the end of the audit period. If the due date falls on a Saturday, Sunday, or Federal holiday, the reporting package is due the next business day. Additionally, per the MDHS Subgrant/ Agreement Manual: All MDHS subgrantees are required to complete the MDHS Subgrantee Audit Information Form (MDHS-DPI-002). This form must be submitted to the Division of Monitoring no later than ninety (90) calendar days after the end of the subgrantee's fiscal year. This form is necessary to certify the sources and amounts of all Federal awards received and expended by the subgrantee. Condition When performing testwork related to 0MB Single Audit Monitoring as of June 30, 2022, the auditor noted two instances in which the Mississippi Department of Human Services (MDHS) did not ascertain whether Single Audit Requirements were being met by subgrantees. Cause Failure to properly monitor subrecipients could allow noncompliance with federal regulations to occur and go undetected, potentially resulting in fraud, waste, and abuse within the agency. Effect Staff were either unaware or did not follow identified policies and procedures for monitoring requirements. Recommendation We recommend the Mississippi Department of Human Services' Office of Compliance - Division of Monitoring (DM) strengthen controls over subrecipient monitoring for Uniform Guidance audits to ensure recipients expending $750,000 or more in Federal funds during their fiscal year are meeting Uniform Guidance Audit requirements. Repeat Finding Yes, 2021-014; 2020-031 in 2020; 2019-043 in 2019; 2018-047 in 2018; 2017- 038 in 2017; 2016-028 in 2016; 2015-009 in 2015; and 2014-016 in 2014. Statistically Valid No.
Material Weakness Material Noncompliance 2022-018 Strengthen Controls over Subrecipient Monitoring to Ensure Compliance with Uniform Guidance Auditing Requirements. ALN Number 93.558 Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) 93.575, 93.596 Child Care Development Fund (CCDF) Federal Award No. G2001MSTANF G200 lMSCCDF Federal Agency Department of Health and Human Services Pass-through Entity NI A Questioned Costs None Criteria The Code of Federal Regulations (2 cfr ?200.331(/)) states all pass-through entities (PTE's) must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F - Audit Requirements of this part when it is expected that the subrecipient's Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in? 200.501 Audit requirements. The Code of Federal Regulations (2 cfr ? 200.512(a)(l)) states the audit must be completed and the data collection form described in paragraph (b) of this section and reporting package described in paragraph ( c) of this section must be submitted within the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor's report(s), or nine months after the end of the audit period. If the due date falls on a Saturday, Sunday, or Federal holiday, the reporting package is due the next business day. Additionally, per the MDHS Subgrant/ Agreement Manual: All MDHS subgrantees are required to complete the MDHS Subgrantee Audit Information Form (MDHS-DPI-002). This form must be submitted to the Division of Monitoring no later than ninety (90) calendar days after the end of the subgrantee's fiscal year. This form is necessary to certify the sources and amounts of all Federal awards received and expended by the subgrantee. Condition When performing testwork related to 0MB Single Audit Monitoring as of June 30, 2022, the auditor noted two instances in which the Mississippi Department of Human Services (MDHS) did not ascertain whether Single Audit Requirements were being met by subgrantees. Cause Failure to properly monitor subrecipients could allow noncompliance with federal regulations to occur and go undetected, potentially resulting in fraud, waste, and abuse within the agency. Effect Staff were either unaware or did not follow identified policies and procedures for monitoring requirements. Recommendation We recommend the Mississippi Department of Human Services' Office of Compliance - Division of Monitoring (DM) strengthen controls over subrecipient monitoring for Uniform Guidance audits to ensure recipients expending $750,000 or more in Federal funds during their fiscal year are meeting Uniform Guidance Audit requirements. Repeat Finding Yes, 2021-014; 2020-031 in 2020; 2019-043 in 2019; 2018-047 in 2018; 2017- 038 in 2017; 2016-028 in 2016; 2015-009 in 2015; and 2014-016 in 2014. Statistically Valid No.
SUBRECIPIENT MONITORING The Department?s internal control structure does not ensure all subrecipients are monitored in accordance with federal requirements. Criteria: All pass-through entities must monitor subrecipients to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved (2 CFR 200.332(d) through (f)). A pass-through entity (PTE) is responsible for: During-the-Award Monitoring ? Monitoring the activities of the subrecipient (through reporting, site visits, regular contact or other means) as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward, and achieves performance goals (2 CFR sections 200.332(d) through (f)). Subaward monitoring must include the following: 1. Reviewing financial and programmatic (performance and special) reports required by the PTE. 2. Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means. 3. Issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE as required by 2 CFR section 200.521. The PTE must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of this part when it is expected that the subrecipient's federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in 2 CFR section 200.501 (2 CFR section 200.332(f)). Federal award recipients must determine whether each agreement entered into for the disbursement of federal program funds casts the entity receiving the funds in the role of a subrecipient or a contractor based on the following definitions (2 CFR 200.331): ? A subrecipient receives federal funds from a non-federal entity to carry out part of a federal program. The legal agreement between the two parties creates a federal assistance relationship commonly known as a sub-award. ? A contractor is an entity (dealer, distributor, merchant or other seller) who has a legal agreement with a non-federal entity to provide goods and services needed to carry out the program under the federal award. Condition: RIDOT passes federal awards through to many organization types, including municipalities, non-profits, and colleges/universities. The Department did not have documentation supporting the monitoring of three subrecipients, two of which are non-profits and one of which is a university. The Department did not review the audit reports for six subrecipients or have any documentation supporting its determination as to whether the subrecipients were required to have an audit as required by 2 CFR 200 subpart F. RIDOT identified three vendors providing goods or services to the department as subrecipients. Cause: Policies, procedures and established controls do not encompass all federal requirements. Effect: Monitoring controls and procedures may be insufficient to ensure that subrecipients are complying with applicable program regulations and requirements. Questioned Costs: None Valid Statistical Sample: Not Applicable RECOMMENDATION 2022-050 Enhance policies, procedures, and controls over subrecipient monitoring to ensure compliance with 2 CFR sections 200.332(d) through (f).
SUBRECIPIENT MONITORING The Department?s internal control structure does not ensure all subrecipients are monitored in accordance with federal requirements. Criteria: All pass-through entities must monitor subrecipients to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved (2 CFR 200.332(d) through (f)). A pass-through entity (PTE) is responsible for: During-the-Award Monitoring ? Monitoring the activities of the subrecipient (through reporting, site visits, regular contact or other means) as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward, and achieves performance goals (2 CFR sections 200.332(d) through (f)). Subaward monitoring must include the following: 1. Reviewing financial and programmatic (performance and special) reports required by the PTE. 2. Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means. 3. Issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE as required by 2 CFR section 200.521. The PTE must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of this part when it is expected that the subrecipient's federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in 2 CFR section 200.501 (2 CFR section 200.332(f)). Federal award recipients must determine whether each agreement entered into for the disbursement of federal program funds casts the entity receiving the funds in the role of a subrecipient or a contractor based on the following definitions (2 CFR 200.331): ? A subrecipient receives federal funds from a non-federal entity to carry out part of a federal program. The legal agreement between the two parties creates a federal assistance relationship commonly known as a sub-award. ? A contractor is an entity (dealer, distributor, merchant or other seller) who has a legal agreement with a non-federal entity to provide goods and services needed to carry out the program under the federal award. Condition: RIDOT passes federal awards through to many organization types, including municipalities, non-profits, and colleges/universities. The Department did not have documentation supporting the monitoring of three subrecipients, two of which are non-profits and one of which is a university. The Department did not review the audit reports for six subrecipients or have any documentation supporting its determination as to whether the subrecipients were required to have an audit as required by 2 CFR 200 subpart F. RIDOT identified three vendors providing goods or services to the department as subrecipients. Cause: Policies, procedures and established controls do not encompass all federal requirements. Effect: Monitoring controls and procedures may be insufficient to ensure that subrecipients are complying with applicable program regulations and requirements. Questioned Costs: None Valid Statistical Sample: Not Applicable RECOMMENDATION 2022-050 Enhance policies, procedures, and controls over subrecipient monitoring to ensure compliance with 2 CFR sections 200.332(d) through (f).
Finding Reference: 2022-005 Federal Agency: Department of Health and Human Services Compliance Requirement: Reporting Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance, Other Matters Federal Program: Impacts All Federal Award Programs Grant Award: Various Condition/Context: The single audit report was not submitted to the Office Management and Budget in accordance with the reporting requirement. Criteria: COSO/Internal Control Framework defines control activities as ?policies and procedures that help ensures management?s directives are carried out? This would include preparation of the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards and the related Data Collection Form in a timely manner. Uniform Guidance 2 CFR 200.501 states that the audit shall be completed, and the data collection form shall be submitted within the earlier of 30 days after the receipt of the auditor?s report, or nine months after the end of the audit period. Accordingly, audits for fiscal years ending June 30, 2022 would be due on March 31, 2023. Cause: The single audit report was not submitted due to delays in year-end closing entries, schedules, and reconciliations. Effect: As a result of the finding, SMTCCAC did not provide required information to its federal oversight agency in a timely manner. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation: We believe that the year-end closing process could proceed in a timely manner by adhering to a closing schedule and maintaining timely account reconciliations. Progress should be monitored by management to determine that due dates are being met and required reports are submitted to regulatory agencies within the compliance time frame. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: See Corrective Action Plans section.
Finding Reference: 2022-005 Federal Agency: Department of Health and Human Services Compliance Requirement: Reporting Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance, Other Matters Federal Program: Impacts All Federal Award Programs Grant Award: Various Condition/Context: The single audit report was not submitted to the Office Management and Budget in accordance with the reporting requirement. Criteria: COSO/Internal Control Framework defines control activities as ?policies and procedures that help ensures management?s directives are carried out? This would include preparation of the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards and the related Data Collection Form in a timely manner. Uniform Guidance 2 CFR 200.501 states that the audit shall be completed, and the data collection form shall be submitted within the earlier of 30 days after the receipt of the auditor?s report, or nine months after the end of the audit period. Accordingly, audits for fiscal years ending June 30, 2022 would be due on March 31, 2023. Cause: The single audit report was not submitted due to delays in year-end closing entries, schedules, and reconciliations. Effect: As a result of the finding, SMTCCAC did not provide required information to its federal oversight agency in a timely manner. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation: We believe that the year-end closing process could proceed in a timely manner by adhering to a closing schedule and maintaining timely account reconciliations. Progress should be monitored by management to determine that due dates are being met and required reports are submitted to regulatory agencies within the compliance time frame. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: See Corrective Action Plans section.
Various Agencies Finding 2022 ? 014: ALN 10.553, 10.555, 10.556, 10.559, and 10.582 ? Child Nutrition Cluster (including COVID-19) ALN 10.557 ? WIC Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (including COVID-19) ALN 10.558 ? Child and Adult Care Food Program (including COVID-19) ALN 15.252 ? Abandoned Mine Land Reclamation ALN 21.023 ? COVID-19 ? Emergency Rental Assistance Program ALN 84.010 ? Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies ALN 84.027 and 84.173 ? ? Special Education Cluster (IDEA) (including COVID-19) ALN 84.425C ? COVID 19 ? Education Stabilization Fund - GEER Fund ALN 84.425D ? COVID 19 ? Education Stabilization Fund - ESSER Fund ALN 84.425R ? COVID 19 ? Education Stabilization Fund - CRRSA EANS ALN 84.425U ? COVID 19 ? Education Stabilization Fund - ARP ESSER ALN 84.425W ? COVID 19 ? Education Stabilization Fund - ARP ESSER HCY ALN 93.558 ? Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (including COVID-19) ALN 93.563 ? Child Support Enforcement ALN 93.575 and 93.596 ? Child Care and Development Fund (CCDF) Cluster (including COVID-19) ALN 93.658 ? Foster Care ? Title IV-E (including COVID-19) ALN 93.659 ? Adoption Assistance (including COVID-19) ALN 93.775, 93.777, and 93.778 ? Medicaid Cluster (including COVID-19) A Material Weakness and Material Noncompliance Exist in the Commonwealth?s Subrecipient Audit Resolution Process (A Similar Condition Was Noted in Prior Year Finding 2021-015) Federal Grant Number(s) and Year(s): 1PA300365 (1/01/2022 ? 9/30/2023), 1PA310305 (10/01/2021 ? 9/30/2022), 1PA310305 (10/01/2020 ? 9/30/2021), 1PA300305 (10/01/2021 ? 9/30/2022), 1PA300305 (10/01/2020 ? 9/30/2021), 1PA320305 (12/27/2020 ? 9/30/2021), Y22174 (10/01/2021 ? 9/30/2024), Y13194 (10/01/2020 ? 9/30/2023), Y03194 (10/01/2019 ? 9/30/2023), Y03191 (10/01/2019 ? 9/30/2020), Y22173 (10/01/2021 ? 9/30/2022), Y22172 (10/01/2021 ? 9/30/2022, Y13191 (10/01/2020 ? 9/30/2021), Y13061 (10/01/2020 ? 9/30/2021), S22AF00017 (1/01/2022 ? 12/31/2024), S21AF10050 (6/01/2021 ? 5/31/2024), S21AF10015 (1/01/2021 ? 12/31/2023), S20AF20092 (10/01/2020 ? 9/30/2023), S20AF20006 (1/01/2020 ? 12/31/2022), S19AF20006 (1/01/2019 ? 12/31/2021), S19AF20004 (12/01/2018 ? 11/30/2023), S18AF20004 (11/01/2017 ? 10/31/2023), ERAE0131 (1/19/2021 ? 12/29/2022), ERAE0333 (5/11/2021 ? 12/30/2025), S010A210038 (7/01/2021 ? 9/30/2022), S010A200038 (7/01/2020 ? 9/30/2021), H027A210093 (7/01/2021 ? 9/30/2022), H027A200093 (7/01/2020 ? 9/30/2021), S425D200028 (3/13/2020 ? 9/30/2022), S425D210028 (3/13/2020 ? 9/30/2022), 2201PATANF (10/01/2021 ? 9/30/2022), 2101PATANF (10/01/2020 ? 9/30/2021), 2001PATANF (10/01/2019 ? 9/30/2020), 2201PACSES (10/01/2021 ? 9/30/2022), 2101PACSES (10/01/2020 ? 9/30/2021), G2201PACCDF (10/01/2021 ? 9/30/2022), G2101PACCDF (10/01/2020 ? 9/30/2021), 2201PAFOST (10/01/2021 ? 9/30/2022), 2101PAFOST (10/01/2020 ? 9/30/2021), 2001PAFOST (10/01/2019 ? 9/30/2020), 2201PAADPT (10/01/2021 ? 9/30/2022), 2101PAADPT (10/01/2020 ? 9/30/2021), 2205PA5MAP (10/01/2021 ? 9/30/2022), 2105PA5MAP (10/01/2020 ? 9/30/2021) Finding 2022 ? 014: (continued) Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency, Noncompliance for Medicaid Cluster Material Weakness, Material Noncompliance for Other Programs Compliance Requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Condition: Under the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania's (Commonwealth) implementation of the Single Audit Act, review and resolution of subrecipient Single Audit reports is split into two stages. The Office of the Budget?s Bureau of Accounting and Financial Management (OB-BAFM) ensures the reports meet technical standards through a centralized desk review process. The various funding agencies in the Commonwealth are responsible for making a management decision on each finding within six months of the Federal Audit Clearinghouse?s (FAC) Management Decision Letter (MDL) start date for audits subject to Uniform Guidance and to ensure appropriate corrective action is taken by the subrecipient (except for Uniform Guidance audits under U.S. Department of Labor programs which are permitted 12 months for management decisions in accordance with 2 CFR Section 2900.21). Each Commonwealth agency is also responsible for reviewing financial information in each audit report to determine whether the audit included all pass-through funding provided by the agency in order to ensure pass-through funds were subject to audit. Most agencies meet this requirement by performing Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) reconciliations. The agency is also required to adjust Commonwealth records, if necessary. Our fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 audit of the Commonwealth?s process for review and resolution of subrecipient Single Audits included an evaluation of the Commonwealth?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2021 subrecipient audit universe for audits due for submission to the FAC during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2022. We also evaluated the Commonwealth?s review of 44 subrecipient audit reports with findings in major programs/clusters which were identified on the Commonwealth agencies? tracking lists during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 and required management decisions by Commonwealth agencies. Our testing disclosed the following audit exceptions regarding the Commonwealth agencies? review of subrecipient audit reports: ? Department of Education (PDE): The time period for making a management decision on findings was approximately 6.5 to over 13 months after the FAC MDL start date for 14 out of 25 audit reports with findings. Three of the 14 audit reports were improperly classified on PDE?s audit tracking list as not having federal award findings. ? Department of Environmental Protection (DEP): The time period for making a management decision on findings was approximately 16.2 months after the FAC MDL start date for one out of three audit reports with findings. In addition, our review disclosed that DEP subgranted federal funds totaling $10,338,570 to one subrecipient during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020, for which a Single Audit was not submitted to the FAC as of our January 2023 testing date. This was over 9.5 months after the March 31, 2022 due date, which had been extended due to the COVID-19 pandemic in accordance with the Office of Management and Budget?s (OMB) Memorandum M-21-20, Appendix 3. ? Department of Health (DOH): Our review disclosed that DOH subgranted federal funds totaling $8,103,407 to one subrecipient during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2020, for which a Single Audit was not submitted to the FAC as of our January 2023 testing date. This was over 12.5 months after the December 31, 2021 due date, which had been extended in accordance with OMB?s Memorandum M-21-20, Appendix 3. ? Department of Human Services (DHS): The time period for making a management decision on findings ranged from approximately 6.6 months to over 19.6 months after the FAC MDL start date for 12 out of 14 subrecipient audit reports with findings. There was also a delay in DHS?s procedures to ensure the subrecipient SEFAs were accurate so that major programs were properly determined and subjected to audit. Finding 2022 ? 014: (continued) As a follow-up to the prior year finding, we noted that the Commonwealth subgranted federal funds totaling $327,988,063 to the City of Philadelphia during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2021, for which a Single Audit was not submitted to the FAC as of our January 2023 testing date. This was over 3.5 months after the September 30, 2022 due date, which had been extended in accordance with OMB?s Memorandum M-21-20, Appendix 3. Our testing disclosed that DHS?s subgrants to the City of Philadelphia were material for five of the 16 major programs/clusters with material subgranted funds. Our follow-up on the prior year finding also disclosed that the Commonwealth subgranted federal funds totaling $28,725,212 to Bucks County during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020, for which a Single Audit was not submitted to the FAC as of our January 2023 testing date. This was over 9.5 months after the March 31, 2022 due date, which had been extended in accordance with OMB?s Memorandum M-21-20, Appendix 3. DHS was the lead agency for the City of Philadelphia and Bucks County audits. Criteria: 2 CFR ?200.332, Requirements for pass-through entities, states in part: All pass-through entities must: (d) Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward, and that subaward performance goals are achieved. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: (2) Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity detected through audits, on-site reviews, and written confirmation from the subrecipient, highlighting the status of actions planned or taken to address Single Audit findings related to the particular subaward. (3) Issuing a management decision for applicable audit findings pertaining only to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity as required by ?200.521 [Management decision]. (f) Verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F [Audit Requirements] of this part when it is expected that the subrecipient?s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in ?200.501 [Audit requirements]. (g) Consider whether the results of the subrecipient?s audit, on-site review, or other monitoring indicate conditions that necessitate adjustments to the pass-through entity?s own records. (h) Consider taking enforcement action against noncompliant subrecipients as described in ?200.339 [Remedies for noncompliance] of this part and in program regulations. In order to carry out these responsibilities properly, good internal control dictates that state pass-through agencies ensure subrecipient Single Audit SEFAs are representative of state payment records each year, and that the related federal programs have been properly subjected to Single Audit procedures. 2 CFR ?200.512, Report submission, states in part: (a) General. (1) The audit must be completed and the data collection form described in paragraph (b) of this section and reporting package described in paragraph (c) of this section must be submitted within the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor?s report(s), or nine months after the end of the audit period. If the due date falls on a Saturday, Sunday, or Federal holiday, the reporting package is due the next business day. Finding 2022 ? 014: (continued) 2 CFR ?200.521, Management decision, states in part: (a) General. The management decision must clearly state whether or not the finding is sustained, the reasons for the decision, and the expected auditee action to repay disallowed costs, make financial adjustments, or take other action. (d) Time requirements. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity responsible for issuing a management decision must do so within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. The auditee must initiate and proceed with corrective action as rapidly as possible and corrective action should begin no later than upon receipt of the audit report. 2 CFR ?200.505, Sanctions, states: In cases of continued inability or unwillingness to have an audit conducted in accordance with this part, Federal agencies and pass-through entities must take appropriate action as provided in ?200.339 [Remedies for noncompliance]. 2 CFR ?200.339, Remedies for noncompliance, states in part: If a non-Federal entity fails to comply with the U.S. Constitution, Federal statutes, regulations or the terms and conditions of a Federal award, the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may impose additional conditions, as described in ?200.208 [Specific conditions]. If the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity determines that noncompliance cannot be remedied by imposing additional conditions, the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may take one or more of the following actions, as appropriate in the circumstances. (a) Temporarily withhold cash payments pending correction of the deficiency by the non-Federal entity or more severe enforcement action by the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity. (b) Disallow (that is, deny both use of funds and any applicable matching credit for) all or part of the cost of the activity or action not in compliance. (c) Wholly or partly suspend or terminate the Federal award. (d) Initiate suspension or debarment proceedings as authorized under 2 CFR Part 180 and Federal awarding agency regulations (or in the case of a pass-through entity, recommend such a proceeding be initiated by a Federal awarding agency). (e) Withhold further Federal awards for the project or program. (f) Take other remedies that may be legally available. To ensure Commonwealth enforcement of federal regulations for subrecipient noncompliance with audit requirements, Commonwealth Management Directive 325.08, Amended ? Remedies for Recipient Noncompliance with Audit Requirements, Section 5 related to policy, states in part: (a) Agencies must develop and implement remedial action that reflects the unique requirements of each program? (b) The remedial action should be implemented within six months from the date the first remedial action is initiated. At the end of the six-month period, the recipient should take the appropriate corrective action or the final stage of remedial action should be imposed on the recipient. Examples of remedial action include, but are not limited to: Finding 2022 ? 014: (continued) (1) Meeting or calling the recipient to explain the importance and benefits of the audit and audit resolution processes, emphasizing the value of the audit as an administrative tool and the Commonwealth?s reliance on an acceptable audit and prompt resolution as evidence of the recipient?s ability to properly administer the program. (2) Encouraging the entity to establish an audit committee or designate an individual as the single point of contact to: (a) Communicate regarding the audit. (b) Arrange for and oversee the audit. (c) Direct and monitor audit resolution. (3) Providing technical assistance to the recipient in devising and implementing an appropriate plan to remedy the noncompliance. (4) Withholding a portion of assistance payments until the noncompliance is resolved. (5) Withholding or disallowing overhead costs until the noncompliance is resolved. (6) Suspending the assistance agreement until the noncompliance is resolved. (7) Terminating the assistance agreement with the recipient and, if necessary, seeking alternative entities to administer the program. Management Directive 325.09, Amended ? Processing Subrecipient Single Audits of Federal Pass-Through Funds, Section 7 related to procedures, states in part: c. Agencies. (1) Evaluate single audit report submissions received from BAFM to determine program purpose acceptability by verifying, at a minimum, that all agency-funded programs are properly included on the applicable financial schedules; that findings affecting the agency contain sufficient information to facilitate a management decision; and that the subrecipient has submitted an adequate corrective action plan. (6) Issue management decisions relative to audit findings and crosscutting findings assigned to the agency for resolution, as required by 2 CFR ?200.521. If responsible for the resolution of crosscutting findings, notify the affected agency or agencies upon resolution of such findings. (7) Impose or coordinate the imposition of remedial action in accordance with 2 CFR Part 200.339 and Management Directive 325.08 Amended, Remedies for Recipient Noncompliance with Audit Requirements, when subrecipients fail to comply with the provisions of Subpart F. Management Directive 325.12, Amended ? Standards for Enterprise Risk Management in Commonwealth Agencies, adopted the internal control framework outlined in the United States Government Accountability Office?s, Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government (Green Book). The Green Book states in part: Management should establish and operate monitoring activities to monitor the internal control system and evaluate the results. Management should remediate identified internal control deficiencies on a timely basis. Cause: One reason provided by Commonwealth management for untimely audit resolution in the various agencies, including making management decisions, approving corrective action, and performing procedures to ensure the accuracy of subrecipient SEFAs, was either a change in staff or a lack of staff to follow up and process subrecipient audit reports more timely. The late management decision at DEP appeared to be the result of a subrecipient being treated as a contractor as described in current year Single Audit Finding #2022-005, despite having a subrecipient Single Audit requirement clause in its contract with DEP. Regarding late and outstanding audit report submissions, the Commonwealth agencies did not appear to be timely implementing remedial action steps in accordance with 2 CFR ?200.339 and Commonwealth Management Directive 325.8 in order to ensure compliance with federal audit submission requirements. Finding 2022 ? 014: (continued) Effect: Since required management decisions were not made within six months to ensure appropriate corrective action was taken on audits received from subrecipients, the Commonwealth did not comply with federal regulations, and subrecipients were not made aware of acceptance or rejection of corrective action plans in a timely manner. Further, noncompliance may recur in future periods if control deficiencies are not corrected on a timely basis, and there is an increased risk of unallowable charges being made to federal programs if corrective action and recovery of questioned costs is not timely. Regarding the SEFA reviews or alternate procedures which are not being performed timely and the late Single Audit report submissions, there is an increased risk that subrecipients could be misspending and/or inappropriately tracking and reporting federal funds over multiple year periods, and these discrepancies may not be properly monitored, detected, and corrected by agency personnel on a timely basis as required. Finally, additional federal pass-through funds may be unaudited in the future without timely and effective remedial action from Commonwealth agencies to enforce compliance. Recommendation: We recommend that the above weaknesses that cause untimely subrecipient Single Audit resolution, including untimely management decisions on findings, untimely review of the SEFA or alternate procedures, and late audit report submissions be corrected to ensure compliance with federal requirements and Commonwealth Management Directives, and to better ensure timelier subrecipient compliance with program requirements. Commonwealth agencies should promptly pursue outstanding audits and implement remedial action steps on a timely basis in accordance with 2 CFR ?200.339 and Commonwealth Management Directive 325.08. PDE Response: PDE agrees with the finding. DEP Response: DEP agrees with the finding. DOH Response: DOH agrees with the finding. DHS Response: While DHS agrees with this finding, we believe we are in compliance with 2 CFR ?200.339 and Commonwealth Management Directive 325.08 related to outstanding audits. We continue to work with counties and their independent auditors to obtain any late Single Audit reports, and albeit late, we do receive them which is the ultimate goal. Questioned Costs: The amount of questioned costs cannot be determined. The corrective action plan for this finding, if any, has not been reviewed by the auditors. See Corrective Action Plans located elsewhere in this Report.
Various Agencies Finding 2022 ? 014: ALN 10.553, 10.555, 10.556, 10.559, and 10.582 ? Child Nutrition Cluster (including COVID-19) ALN 10.557 ? WIC Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (including COVID-19) ALN 10.558 ? Child and Adult Care Food Program (including COVID-19) ALN 15.252 ? Abandoned Mine Land Reclamation ALN 21.023 ? COVID-19 ? Emergency Rental Assistance Program ALN 84.010 ? Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies ALN 84.027 and 84.173 ? ? Special Education Cluster (IDEA) (including COVID-19) ALN 84.425C ? COVID 19 ? Education Stabilization Fund - GEER Fund ALN 84.425D ? COVID 19 ? Education Stabilization Fund - ESSER Fund ALN 84.425R ? COVID 19 ? Education Stabilization Fund - CRRSA EANS ALN 84.425U ? COVID 19 ? Education Stabilization Fund - ARP ESSER ALN 84.425W ? COVID 19 ? Education Stabilization Fund - ARP ESSER HCY ALN 93.558 ? Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (including COVID-19) ALN 93.563 ? Child Support Enforcement ALN 93.575 and 93.596 ? Child Care and Development Fund (CCDF) Cluster (including COVID-19) ALN 93.658 ? Foster Care ? Title IV-E (including COVID-19) ALN 93.659 ? Adoption Assistance (including COVID-19) ALN 93.775, 93.777, and 93.778 ? Medicaid Cluster (including COVID-19) A Material Weakness and Material Noncompliance Exist in the Commonwealth?s Subrecipient Audit Resolution Process (A Similar Condition Was Noted in Prior Year Finding 2021-015) Federal Grant Number(s) and Year(s): 1PA300365 (1/01/2022 ? 9/30/2023), 1PA310305 (10/01/2021 ? 9/30/2022), 1PA310305 (10/01/2020 ? 9/30/2021), 1PA300305 (10/01/2021 ? 9/30/2022), 1PA300305 (10/01/2020 ? 9/30/2021), 1PA320305 (12/27/2020 ? 9/30/2021), Y22174 (10/01/2021 ? 9/30/2024), Y13194 (10/01/2020 ? 9/30/2023), Y03194 (10/01/2019 ? 9/30/2023), Y03191 (10/01/2019 ? 9/30/2020), Y22173 (10/01/2021 ? 9/30/2022), Y22172 (10/01/2021 ? 9/30/2022, Y13191 (10/01/2020 ? 9/30/2021), Y13061 (10/01/2020 ? 9/30/2021), S22AF00017 (1/01/2022 ? 12/31/2024), S21AF10050 (6/01/2021 ? 5/31/2024), S21AF10015 (1/01/2021 ? 12/31/2023), S20AF20092 (10/01/2020 ? 9/30/2023), S20AF20006 (1/01/2020 ? 12/31/2022), S19AF20006 (1/01/2019 ? 12/31/2021), S19AF20004 (12/01/2018 ? 11/30/2023), S18AF20004 (11/01/2017 ? 10/31/2023), ERAE0131 (1/19/2021 ? 12/29/2022), ERAE0333 (5/11/2021 ? 12/30/2025), S010A210038 (7/01/2021 ? 9/30/2022), S010A200038 (7/01/2020 ? 9/30/2021), H027A210093 (7/01/2021 ? 9/30/2022), H027A200093 (7/01/2020 ? 9/30/2021), S425D200028 (3/13/2020 ? 9/30/2022), S425D210028 (3/13/2020 ? 9/30/2022), 2201PATANF (10/01/2021 ? 9/30/2022), 2101PATANF (10/01/2020 ? 9/30/2021), 2001PATANF (10/01/2019 ? 9/30/2020), 2201PACSES (10/01/2021 ? 9/30/2022), 2101PACSES (10/01/2020 ? 9/30/2021), G2201PACCDF (10/01/2021 ? 9/30/2022), G2101PACCDF (10/01/2020 ? 9/30/2021), 2201PAFOST (10/01/2021 ? 9/30/2022), 2101PAFOST (10/01/2020 ? 9/30/2021), 2001PAFOST (10/01/2019 ? 9/30/2020), 2201PAADPT (10/01/2021 ? 9/30/2022), 2101PAADPT (10/01/2020 ? 9/30/2021), 2205PA5MAP (10/01/2021 ? 9/30/2022), 2105PA5MAP (10/01/2020 ? 9/30/2021) Finding 2022 ? 014: (continued) Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency, Noncompliance for Medicaid Cluster Material Weakness, Material Noncompliance for Other Programs Compliance Requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Condition: Under the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania's (Commonwealth) implementation of the Single Audit Act, review and resolution of subrecipient Single Audit reports is split into two stages. The Office of the Budget?s Bureau of Accounting and Financial Management (OB-BAFM) ensures the reports meet technical standards through a centralized desk review process. The various funding agencies in the Commonwealth are responsible for making a management decision on each finding within six months of the Federal Audit Clearinghouse?s (FAC) Management Decision Letter (MDL) start date for audits subject to Uniform Guidance and to ensure appropriate corrective action is taken by the subrecipient (except for Uniform Guidance audits under U.S. Department of Labor programs which are permitted 12 months for management decisions in accordance with 2 CFR Section 2900.21). Each Commonwealth agency is also responsible for reviewing financial information in each audit report to determine whether the audit included all pass-through funding provided by the agency in order to ensure pass-through funds were subject to audit. Most agencies meet this requirement by performing Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) reconciliations. The agency is also required to adjust Commonwealth records, if necessary. Our fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 audit of the Commonwealth?s process for review and resolution of subrecipient Single Audits included an evaluation of the Commonwealth?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2021 subrecipient audit universe for audits due for submission to the FAC during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2022. We also evaluated the Commonwealth?s review of 44 subrecipient audit reports with findings in major programs/clusters which were identified on the Commonwealth agencies? tracking lists during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 and required management decisions by Commonwealth agencies. Our testing disclosed the following audit exceptions regarding the Commonwealth agencies? review of subrecipient audit reports: ? Department of Education (PDE): The time period for making a management decision on findings was approximately 6.5 to over 13 months after the FAC MDL start date for 14 out of 25 audit reports with findings. Three of the 14 audit reports were improperly classified on PDE?s audit tracking list as not having federal award findings. ? Department of Environmental Protection (DEP): The time period for making a management decision on findings was approximately 16.2 months after the FAC MDL start date for one out of three audit reports with findings. In addition, our review disclosed that DEP subgranted federal funds totaling $10,338,570 to one subrecipient during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020, for which a Single Audit was not submitted to the FAC as of our January 2023 testing date. This was over 9.5 months after the March 31, 2022 due date, which had been extended due to the COVID-19 pandemic in accordance with the Office of Management and Budget?s (OMB) Memorandum M-21-20, Appendix 3. ? Department of Health (DOH): Our review disclosed that DOH subgranted federal funds totaling $8,103,407 to one subrecipient during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2020, for which a Single Audit was not submitted to the FAC as of our January 2023 testing date. This was over 12.5 months after the December 31, 2021 due date, which had been extended in accordance with OMB?s Memorandum M-21-20, Appendix 3. ? Department of Human Services (DHS): The time period for making a management decision on findings ranged from approximately 6.6 months to over 19.6 months after the FAC MDL start date for 12 out of 14 subrecipient audit reports with findings. There was also a delay in DHS?s procedures to ensure the subrecipient SEFAs were accurate so that major programs were properly determined and subjected to audit. Finding 2022 ? 014: (continued) As a follow-up to the prior year finding, we noted that the Commonwealth subgranted federal funds totaling $327,988,063 to the City of Philadelphia during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2021, for which a Single Audit was not submitted to the FAC as of our January 2023 testing date. This was over 3.5 months after the September 30, 2022 due date, which had been extended in accordance with OMB?s Memorandum M-21-20, Appendix 3. Our testing disclosed that DHS?s subgrants to the City of Philadelphia were material for five of the 16 major programs/clusters with material subgranted funds. Our follow-up on the prior year finding also disclosed that the Commonwealth subgranted federal funds totaling $28,725,212 to Bucks County during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020, for which a Single Audit was not submitted to the FAC as of our January 2023 testing date. This was over 9.5 months after the March 31, 2022 due date, which had been extended in accordance with OMB?s Memorandum M-21-20, Appendix 3. DHS was the lead agency for the City of Philadelphia and Bucks County audits. Criteria: 2 CFR ?200.332, Requirements for pass-through entities, states in part: All pass-through entities must: (d) Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward, and that subaward performance goals are achieved. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: (2) Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity detected through audits, on-site reviews, and written confirmation from the subrecipient, highlighting the status of actions planned or taken to address Single Audit findings related to the particular subaward. (3) Issuing a management decision for applicable audit findings pertaining only to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity as required by ?200.521 [Management decision]. (f) Verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F [Audit Requirements] of this part when it is expected that the subrecipient?s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in ?200.501 [Audit requirements]. (g) Consider whether the results of the subrecipient?s audit, on-site review, or other monitoring indicate conditions that necessitate adjustments to the pass-through entity?s own records. (h) Consider taking enforcement action against noncompliant subrecipients as described in ?200.339 [Remedies for noncompliance] of this part and in program regulations. In order to carry out these responsibilities properly, good internal control dictates that state pass-through agencies ensure subrecipient Single Audit SEFAs are representative of state payment records each year, and that the related federal programs have been properly subjected to Single Audit procedures. 2 CFR ?200.512, Report submission, states in part: (a) General. (1) The audit must be completed and the data collection form described in paragraph (b) of this section and reporting package described in paragraph (c) of this section must be submitted within the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor?s report(s), or nine months after the end of the audit period. If the due date falls on a Saturday, Sunday, or Federal holiday, the reporting package is due the next business day. Finding 2022 ? 014: (continued) 2 CFR ?200.521, Management decision, states in part: (a) General. The management decision must clearly state whether or not the finding is sustained, the reasons for the decision, and the expected auditee action to repay disallowed costs, make financial adjustments, or take other action. (d) Time requirements. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity responsible for issuing a management decision must do so within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. The auditee must initiate and proceed with corrective action as rapidly as possible and corrective action should begin no later than upon receipt of the audit report. 2 CFR ?200.505, Sanctions, states: In cases of continued inability or unwillingness to have an audit conducted in accordance with this part, Federal agencies and pass-through entities must take appropriate action as provided in ?200.339 [Remedies for noncompliance]. 2 CFR ?200.339, Remedies for noncompliance, states in part: If a non-Federal entity fails to comply with the U.S. Constitution, Federal statutes, regulations or the terms and conditions of a Federal award, the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may impose additional conditions, as described in ?200.208 [Specific conditions]. If the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity determines that noncompliance cannot be remedied by imposing additional conditions, the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may take one or more of the following actions, as appropriate in the circumstances. (a) Temporarily withhold cash payments pending correction of the deficiency by the non-Federal entity or more severe enforcement action by the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity. (b) Disallow (that is, deny both use of funds and any applicable matching credit for) all or part of the cost of the activity or action not in compliance. (c) Wholly or partly suspend or terminate the Federal award. (d) Initiate suspension or debarment proceedings as authorized under 2 CFR Part 180 and Federal awarding agency regulations (or in the case of a pass-through entity, recommend such a proceeding be initiated by a Federal awarding agency). (e) Withhold further Federal awards for the project or program. (f) Take other remedies that may be legally available. To ensure Commonwealth enforcement of federal regulations for subrecipient noncompliance with audit requirements, Commonwealth Management Directive 325.08, Amended ? Remedies for Recipient Noncompliance with Audit Requirements, Section 5 related to policy, states in part: (a) Agencies must develop and implement remedial action that reflects the unique requirements of each program? (b) The remedial action should be implemented within six months from the date the first remedial action is initiated. At the end of the six-month period, the recipient should take the appropriate corrective action or the final stage of remedial action should be imposed on the recipient. Examples of remedial action include, but are not limited to: Finding 2022 ? 014: (continued) (1) Meeting or calling the recipient to explain the importance and benefits of the audit and audit resolution processes, emphasizing the value of the audit as an administrative tool and the Commonwealth?s reliance on an acceptable audit and prompt resolution as evidence of the recipient?s ability to properly administer the program. (2) Encouraging the entity to establish an audit committee or designate an individual as the single point of contact to: (a) Communicate regarding the audit. (b) Arrange for and oversee the audit. (c) Direct and monitor audit resolution. (3) Providing technical assistance to the recipient in devising and implementing an appropriate plan to remedy the noncompliance. (4) Withholding a portion of assistance payments until the noncompliance is resolved. (5) Withholding or disallowing overhead costs until the noncompliance is resolved. (6) Suspending the assistance agreement until the noncompliance is resolved. (7) Terminating the assistance agreement with the recipient and, if necessary, seeking alternative entities to administer the program. Management Directive 325.09, Amended ? Processing Subrecipient Single Audits of Federal Pass-Through Funds, Section 7 related to procedures, states in part: c. Agencies. (1) Evaluate single audit report submissions received from BAFM to determine program purpose acceptability by verifying, at a minimum, that all agency-funded programs are properly included on the applicable financial schedules; that findings affecting the agency contain sufficient information to facilitate a management decision; and that the subrecipient has submitted an adequate corrective action plan. (6) Issue management decisions relative to audit findings and crosscutting findings assigned to the agency for resolution, as required by 2 CFR ?200.521. If responsible for the resolution of crosscutting findings, notify the affected agency or agencies upon resolution of such findings. (7) Impose or coordinate the imposition of remedial action in accordance with 2 CFR Part 200.339 and Management Directive 325.08 Amended, Remedies for Recipient Noncompliance with Audit Requirements, when subrecipients fail to comply with the provisions of Subpart F. Management Directive 325.12, Amended ? Standards for Enterprise Risk Management in Commonwealth Agencies, adopted the internal control framework outlined in the United States Government Accountability Office?s, Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government (Green Book). The Green Book states in part: Management should establish and operate monitoring activities to monitor the internal control system and evaluate the results. Management should remediate identified internal control deficiencies on a timely basis. Cause: One reason provided by Commonwealth management for untimely audit resolution in the various agencies, including making management decisions, approving corrective action, and performing procedures to ensure the accuracy of subrecipient SEFAs, was either a change in staff or a lack of staff to follow up and process subrecipient audit reports more timely. The late management decision at DEP appeared to be the result of a subrecipient being treated as a contractor as described in current year Single Audit Finding #2022-005, despite having a subrecipient Single Audit requirement clause in its contract with DEP. Regarding late and outstanding audit report submissions, the Commonwealth agencies did not appear to be timely implementing remedial action steps in accordance with 2 CFR ?200.339 and Commonwealth Management Directive 325.8 in order to ensure compliance with federal audit submission requirements. Finding 2022 ? 014: (continued) Effect: Since required management decisions were not made within six months to ensure appropriate corrective action was taken on audits received from subrecipients, the Commonwealth did not comply with federal regulations, and subrecipients were not made aware of acceptance or rejection of corrective action plans in a timely manner. Further, noncompliance may recur in future periods if control deficiencies are not corrected on a timely basis, and there is an increased risk of unallowable charges being made to federal programs if corrective action and recovery of questioned costs is not timely. Regarding the SEFA reviews or alternate procedures which are not being performed timely and the late Single Audit report submissions, there is an increased risk that subrecipients could be misspending and/or inappropriately tracking and reporting federal funds over multiple year periods, and these discrepancies may not be properly monitored, detected, and corrected by agency personnel on a timely basis as required. Finally, additional federal pass-through funds may be unaudited in the future without timely and effective remedial action from Commonwealth agencies to enforce compliance. Recommendation: We recommend that the above weaknesses that cause untimely subrecipient Single Audit resolution, including untimely management decisions on findings, untimely review of the SEFA or alternate procedures, and late audit report submissions be corrected to ensure compliance with federal requirements and Commonwealth Management Directives, and to better ensure timelier subrecipient compliance with program requirements. Commonwealth agencies should promptly pursue outstanding audits and implement remedial action steps on a timely basis in accordance with 2 CFR ?200.339 and Commonwealth Management Directive 325.08. PDE Response: PDE agrees with the finding. DEP Response: DEP agrees with the finding. DOH Response: DOH agrees with the finding. DHS Response: While DHS agrees with this finding, we believe we are in compliance with 2 CFR ?200.339 and Commonwealth Management Directive 325.08 related to outstanding audits. We continue to work with counties and their independent auditors to obtain any late Single Audit reports, and albeit late, we do receive them which is the ultimate goal. Questioned Costs: The amount of questioned costs cannot be determined. The corrective action plan for this finding, if any, has not been reviewed by the auditors. See Corrective Action Plans located elsewhere in this Report.
Various Agencies Finding 2022 ? 014: ALN 10.553, 10.555, 10.556, 10.559, and 10.582 ? Child Nutrition Cluster (including COVID-19) ALN 10.557 ? WIC Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (including COVID-19) ALN 10.558 ? Child and Adult Care Food Program (including COVID-19) ALN 15.252 ? Abandoned Mine Land Reclamation ALN 21.023 ? COVID-19 ? Emergency Rental Assistance Program ALN 84.010 ? Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies ALN 84.027 and 84.173 ? ? Special Education Cluster (IDEA) (including COVID-19) ALN 84.425C ? COVID 19 ? Education Stabilization Fund - GEER Fund ALN 84.425D ? COVID 19 ? Education Stabilization Fund - ESSER Fund ALN 84.425R ? COVID 19 ? Education Stabilization Fund - CRRSA EANS ALN 84.425U ? COVID 19 ? Education Stabilization Fund - ARP ESSER ALN 84.425W ? COVID 19 ? Education Stabilization Fund - ARP ESSER HCY ALN 93.558 ? Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (including COVID-19) ALN 93.563 ? Child Support Enforcement ALN 93.575 and 93.596 ? Child Care and Development Fund (CCDF) Cluster (including COVID-19) ALN 93.658 ? Foster Care ? Title IV-E (including COVID-19) ALN 93.659 ? Adoption Assistance (including COVID-19) ALN 93.775, 93.777, and 93.778 ? Medicaid Cluster (including COVID-19) A Material Weakness and Material Noncompliance Exist in the Commonwealth?s Subrecipient Audit Resolution Process (A Similar Condition Was Noted in Prior Year Finding 2021-015) Federal Grant Number(s) and Year(s): 1PA300365 (1/01/2022 ? 9/30/2023), 1PA310305 (10/01/2021 ? 9/30/2022), 1PA310305 (10/01/2020 ? 9/30/2021), 1PA300305 (10/01/2021 ? 9/30/2022), 1PA300305 (10/01/2020 ? 9/30/2021), 1PA320305 (12/27/2020 ? 9/30/2021), Y22174 (10/01/2021 ? 9/30/2024), Y13194 (10/01/2020 ? 9/30/2023), Y03194 (10/01/2019 ? 9/30/2023), Y03191 (10/01/2019 ? 9/30/2020), Y22173 (10/01/2021 ? 9/30/2022), Y22172 (10/01/2021 ? 9/30/2022, Y13191 (10/01/2020 ? 9/30/2021), Y13061 (10/01/2020 ? 9/30/2021), S22AF00017 (1/01/2022 ? 12/31/2024), S21AF10050 (6/01/2021 ? 5/31/2024), S21AF10015 (1/01/2021 ? 12/31/2023), S20AF20092 (10/01/2020 ? 9/30/2023), S20AF20006 (1/01/2020 ? 12/31/2022), S19AF20006 (1/01/2019 ? 12/31/2021), S19AF20004 (12/01/2018 ? 11/30/2023), S18AF20004 (11/01/2017 ? 10/31/2023), ERAE0131 (1/19/2021 ? 12/29/2022), ERAE0333 (5/11/2021 ? 12/30/2025), S010A210038 (7/01/2021 ? 9/30/2022), S010A200038 (7/01/2020 ? 9/30/2021), H027A210093 (7/01/2021 ? 9/30/2022), H027A200093 (7/01/2020 ? 9/30/2021), S425D200028 (3/13/2020 ? 9/30/2022), S425D210028 (3/13/2020 ? 9/30/2022), 2201PATANF (10/01/2021 ? 9/30/2022), 2101PATANF (10/01/2020 ? 9/30/2021), 2001PATANF (10/01/2019 ? 9/30/2020), 2201PACSES (10/01/2021 ? 9/30/2022), 2101PACSES (10/01/2020 ? 9/30/2021), G2201PACCDF (10/01/2021 ? 9/30/2022), G2101PACCDF (10/01/2020 ? 9/30/2021), 2201PAFOST (10/01/2021 ? 9/30/2022), 2101PAFOST (10/01/2020 ? 9/30/2021), 2001PAFOST (10/01/2019 ? 9/30/2020), 2201PAADPT (10/01/2021 ? 9/30/2022), 2101PAADPT (10/01/2020 ? 9/30/2021), 2205PA5MAP (10/01/2021 ? 9/30/2022), 2105PA5MAP (10/01/2020 ? 9/30/2021) Finding 2022 ? 014: (continued) Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency, Noncompliance for Medicaid Cluster Material Weakness, Material Noncompliance for Other Programs Compliance Requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Condition: Under the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania's (Commonwealth) implementation of the Single Audit Act, review and resolution of subrecipient Single Audit reports is split into two stages. The Office of the Budget?s Bureau of Accounting and Financial Management (OB-BAFM) ensures the reports meet technical standards through a centralized desk review process. The various funding agencies in the Commonwealth are responsible for making a management decision on each finding within six months of the Federal Audit Clearinghouse?s (FAC) Management Decision Letter (MDL) start date for audits subject to Uniform Guidance and to ensure appropriate corrective action is taken by the subrecipient (except for Uniform Guidance audits under U.S. Department of Labor programs which are permitted 12 months for management decisions in accordance with 2 CFR Section 2900.21). Each Commonwealth agency is also responsible for reviewing financial information in each audit report to determine whether the audit included all pass-through funding provided by the agency in order to ensure pass-through funds were subject to audit. Most agencies meet this requirement by performing Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) reconciliations. The agency is also required to adjust Commonwealth records, if necessary. Our fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 audit of the Commonwealth?s process for review and resolution of subrecipient Single Audits included an evaluation of the Commonwealth?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2021 subrecipient audit universe for audits due for submission to the FAC during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2022. We also evaluated the Commonwealth?s review of 44 subrecipient audit reports with findings in major programs/clusters which were identified on the Commonwealth agencies? tracking lists during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 and required management decisions by Commonwealth agencies. Our testing disclosed the following audit exceptions regarding the Commonwealth agencies? review of subrecipient audit reports: ? Department of Education (PDE): The time period for making a management decision on findings was approximately 6.5 to over 13 months after the FAC MDL start date for 14 out of 25 audit reports with findings. Three of the 14 audit reports were improperly classified on PDE?s audit tracking list as not having federal award findings. ? Department of Environmental Protection (DEP): The time period for making a management decision on findings was approximately 16.2 months after the FAC MDL start date for one out of three audit reports with findings. In addition, our review disclosed that DEP subgranted federal funds totaling $10,338,570 to one subrecipient during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020, for which a Single Audit was not submitted to the FAC as of our January 2023 testing date. This was over 9.5 months after the March 31, 2022 due date, which had been extended due to the COVID-19 pandemic in accordance with the Office of Management and Budget?s (OMB) Memorandum M-21-20, Appendix 3. ? Department of Health (DOH): Our review disclosed that DOH subgranted federal funds totaling $8,103,407 to one subrecipient during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2020, for which a Single Audit was not submitted to the FAC as of our January 2023 testing date. This was over 12.5 months after the December 31, 2021 due date, which had been extended in accordance with OMB?s Memorandum M-21-20, Appendix 3. ? Department of Human Services (DHS): The time period for making a management decision on findings ranged from approximately 6.6 months to over 19.6 months after the FAC MDL start date for 12 out of 14 subrecipient audit reports with findings. There was also a delay in DHS?s procedures to ensure the subrecipient SEFAs were accurate so that major programs were properly determined and subjected to audit. Finding 2022 ? 014: (continued) As a follow-up to the prior year finding, we noted that the Commonwealth subgranted federal funds totaling $327,988,063 to the City of Philadelphia during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2021, for which a Single Audit was not submitted to the FAC as of our January 2023 testing date. This was over 3.5 months after the September 30, 2022 due date, which had been extended in accordance with OMB?s Memorandum M-21-20, Appendix 3. Our testing disclosed that DHS?s subgrants to the City of Philadelphia were material for five of the 16 major programs/clusters with material subgranted funds. Our follow-up on the prior year finding also disclosed that the Commonwealth subgranted federal funds totaling $28,725,212 to Bucks County during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020, for which a Single Audit was not submitted to the FAC as of our January 2023 testing date. This was over 9.5 months after the March 31, 2022 due date, which had been extended in accordance with OMB?s Memorandum M-21-20, Appendix 3. DHS was the lead agency for the City of Philadelphia and Bucks County audits. Criteria: 2 CFR ?200.332, Requirements for pass-through entities, states in part: All pass-through entities must: (d) Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward, and that subaward performance goals are achieved. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: (2) Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity detected through audits, on-site reviews, and written confirmation from the subrecipient, highlighting the status of actions planned or taken to address Single Audit findings related to the particular subaward. (3) Issuing a management decision for applicable audit findings pertaining only to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity as required by ?200.521 [Management decision]. (f) Verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F [Audit Requirements] of this part when it is expected that the subrecipient?s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in ?200.501 [Audit requirements]. (g) Consider whether the results of the subrecipient?s audit, on-site review, or other monitoring indicate conditions that necessitate adjustments to the pass-through entity?s own records. (h) Consider taking enforcement action against noncompliant subrecipients as described in ?200.339 [Remedies for noncompliance] of this part and in program regulations. In order to carry out these responsibilities properly, good internal control dictates that state pass-through agencies ensure subrecipient Single Audit SEFAs are representative of state payment records each year, and that the related federal programs have been properly subjected to Single Audit procedures. 2 CFR ?200.512, Report submission, states in part: (a) General. (1) The audit must be completed and the data collection form described in paragraph (b) of this section and reporting package described in paragraph (c) of this section must be submitted within the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor?s report(s), or nine months after the end of the audit period. If the due date falls on a Saturday, Sunday, or Federal holiday, the reporting package is due the next business day. Finding 2022 ? 014: (continued) 2 CFR ?200.521, Management decision, states in part: (a) General. The management decision must clearly state whether or not the finding is sustained, the reasons for the decision, and the expected auditee action to repay disallowed costs, make financial adjustments, or take other action. (d) Time requirements. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity responsible for issuing a management decision must do so within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. The auditee must initiate and proceed with corrective action as rapidly as possible and corrective action should begin no later than upon receipt of the audit report. 2 CFR ?200.505, Sanctions, states: In cases of continued inability or unwillingness to have an audit conducted in accordance with this part, Federal agencies and pass-through entities must take appropriate action as provided in ?200.339 [Remedies for noncompliance]. 2 CFR ?200.339, Remedies for noncompliance, states in part: If a non-Federal entity fails to comply with the U.S. Constitution, Federal statutes, regulations or the terms and conditions of a Federal award, the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may impose additional conditions, as described in ?200.208 [Specific conditions]. If the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity determines that noncompliance cannot be remedied by imposing additional conditions, the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may take one or more of the following actions, as appropriate in the circumstances. (a) Temporarily withhold cash payments pending correction of the deficiency by the non-Federal entity or more severe enforcement action by the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity. (b) Disallow (that is, deny both use of funds and any applicable matching credit for) all or part of the cost of the activity or action not in compliance. (c) Wholly or partly suspend or terminate the Federal award. (d) Initiate suspension or debarment proceedings as authorized under 2 CFR Part 180 and Federal awarding agency regulations (or in the case of a pass-through entity, recommend such a proceeding be initiated by a Federal awarding agency). (e) Withhold further Federal awards for the project or program. (f) Take other remedies that may be legally available. To ensure Commonwealth enforcement of federal regulations for subrecipient noncompliance with audit requirements, Commonwealth Management Directive 325.08, Amended ? Remedies for Recipient Noncompliance with Audit Requirements, Section 5 related to policy, states in part: (a) Agencies must develop and implement remedial action that reflects the unique requirements of each program? (b) The remedial action should be implemented within six months from the date the first remedial action is initiated. At the end of the six-month period, the recipient should take the appropriate corrective action or the final stage of remedial action should be imposed on the recipient. Examples of remedial action include, but are not limited to: Finding 2022 ? 014: (continued) (1) Meeting or calling the recipient to explain the importance and benefits of the audit and audit resolution processes, emphasizing the value of the audit as an administrative tool and the Commonwealth?s reliance on an acceptable audit and prompt resolution as evidence of the recipient?s ability to properly administer the program. (2) Encouraging the entity to establish an audit committee or designate an individual as the single point of contact to: (a) Communicate regarding the audit. (b) Arrange for and oversee the audit. (c) Direct and monitor audit resolution. (3) Providing technical assistance to the recipient in devising and implementing an appropriate plan to remedy the noncompliance. (4) Withholding a portion of assistance payments until the noncompliance is resolved. (5) Withholding or disallowing overhead costs until the noncompliance is resolved. (6) Suspending the assistance agreement until the noncompliance is resolved. (7) Terminating the assistance agreement with the recipient and, if necessary, seeking alternative entities to administer the program. Management Directive 325.09, Amended ? Processing Subrecipient Single Audits of Federal Pass-Through Funds, Section 7 related to procedures, states in part: c. Agencies. (1) Evaluate single audit report submissions received from BAFM to determine program purpose acceptability by verifying, at a minimum, that all agency-funded programs are properly included on the applicable financial schedules; that findings affecting the agency contain sufficient information to facilitate a management decision; and that the subrecipient has submitted an adequate corrective action plan. (6) Issue management decisions relative to audit findings and crosscutting findings assigned to the agency for resolution, as required by 2 CFR ?200.521. If responsible for the resolution of crosscutting findings, notify the affected agency or agencies upon resolution of such findings. (7) Impose or coordinate the imposition of remedial action in accordance with 2 CFR Part 200.339 and Management Directive 325.08 Amended, Remedies for Recipient Noncompliance with Audit Requirements, when subrecipients fail to comply with the provisions of Subpart F. Management Directive 325.12, Amended ? Standards for Enterprise Risk Management in Commonwealth Agencies, adopted the internal control framework outlined in the United States Government Accountability Office?s, Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government (Green Book). The Green Book states in part: Management should establish and operate monitoring activities to monitor the internal control system and evaluate the results. Management should remediate identified internal control deficiencies on a timely basis. Cause: One reason provided by Commonwealth management for untimely audit resolution in the various agencies, including making management decisions, approving corrective action, and performing procedures to ensure the accuracy of subrecipient SEFAs, was either a change in staff or a lack of staff to follow up and process subrecipient audit reports more timely. The late management decision at DEP appeared to be the result of a subrecipient being treated as a contractor as described in current year Single Audit Finding #2022-005, despite having a subrecipient Single Audit requirement clause in its contract with DEP. Regarding late and outstanding audit report submissions, the Commonwealth agencies did not appear to be timely implementing remedial action steps in accordance with 2 CFR ?200.339 and Commonwealth Management Directive 325.8 in order to ensure compliance with federal audit submission requirements. Finding 2022 ? 014: (continued) Effect: Since required management decisions were not made within six months to ensure appropriate corrective action was taken on audits received from subrecipients, the Commonwealth did not comply with federal regulations, and subrecipients were not made aware of acceptance or rejection of corrective action plans in a timely manner. Further, noncompliance may recur in future periods if control deficiencies are not corrected on a timely basis, and there is an increased risk of unallowable charges being made to federal programs if corrective action and recovery of questioned costs is not timely. Regarding the SEFA reviews or alternate procedures which are not being performed timely and the late Single Audit report submissions, there is an increased risk that subrecipients could be misspending and/or inappropriately tracking and reporting federal funds over multiple year periods, and these discrepancies may not be properly monitored, detected, and corrected by agency personnel on a timely basis as required. Finally, additional federal pass-through funds may be unaudited in the future without timely and effective remedial action from Commonwealth agencies to enforce compliance. Recommendation: We recommend that the above weaknesses that cause untimely subrecipient Single Audit resolution, including untimely management decisions on findings, untimely review of the SEFA or alternate procedures, and late audit report submissions be corrected to ensure compliance with federal requirements and Commonwealth Management Directives, and to better ensure timelier subrecipient compliance with program requirements. Commonwealth agencies should promptly pursue outstanding audits and implement remedial action steps on a timely basis in accordance with 2 CFR ?200.339 and Commonwealth Management Directive 325.08. PDE Response: PDE agrees with the finding. DEP Response: DEP agrees with the finding. DOH Response: DOH agrees with the finding. DHS Response: While DHS agrees with this finding, we believe we are in compliance with 2 CFR ?200.339 and Commonwealth Management Directive 325.08 related to outstanding audits. We continue to work with counties and their independent auditors to obtain any late Single Audit reports, and albeit late, we do receive them which is the ultimate goal. Questioned Costs: The amount of questioned costs cannot be determined. The corrective action plan for this finding, if any, has not been reviewed by the auditors. See Corrective Action Plans located elsewhere in this Report.
Various Agencies Finding 2022 ? 014: ALN 10.553, 10.555, 10.556, 10.559, and 10.582 ? Child Nutrition Cluster (including COVID-19) ALN 10.557 ? WIC Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (including COVID-19) ALN 10.558 ? Child and Adult Care Food Program (including COVID-19) ALN 15.252 ? Abandoned Mine Land Reclamation ALN 21.023 ? COVID-19 ? Emergency Rental Assistance Program ALN 84.010 ? Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies ALN 84.027 and 84.173 ? ? Special Education Cluster (IDEA) (including COVID-19) ALN 84.425C ? COVID 19 ? Education Stabilization Fund - GEER Fund ALN 84.425D ? COVID 19 ? Education Stabilization Fund - ESSER Fund ALN 84.425R ? COVID 19 ? Education Stabilization Fund - CRRSA EANS ALN 84.425U ? COVID 19 ? Education Stabilization Fund - ARP ESSER ALN 84.425W ? COVID 19 ? Education Stabilization Fund - ARP ESSER HCY ALN 93.558 ? Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (including COVID-19) ALN 93.563 ? Child Support Enforcement ALN 93.575 and 93.596 ? Child Care and Development Fund (CCDF) Cluster (including COVID-19) ALN 93.658 ? Foster Care ? Title IV-E (including COVID-19) ALN 93.659 ? Adoption Assistance (including COVID-19) ALN 93.775, 93.777, and 93.778 ? Medicaid Cluster (including COVID-19) A Material Weakness and Material Noncompliance Exist in the Commonwealth?s Subrecipient Audit Resolution Process (A Similar Condition Was Noted in Prior Year Finding 2021-015) Federal Grant Number(s) and Year(s): 1PA300365 (1/01/2022 ? 9/30/2023), 1PA310305 (10/01/2021 ? 9/30/2022), 1PA310305 (10/01/2020 ? 9/30/2021), 1PA300305 (10/01/2021 ? 9/30/2022), 1PA300305 (10/01/2020 ? 9/30/2021), 1PA320305 (12/27/2020 ? 9/30/2021), Y22174 (10/01/2021 ? 9/30/2024), Y13194 (10/01/2020 ? 9/30/2023), Y03194 (10/01/2019 ? 9/30/2023), Y03191 (10/01/2019 ? 9/30/2020), Y22173 (10/01/2021 ? 9/30/2022), Y22172 (10/01/2021 ? 9/30/2022, Y13191 (10/01/2020 ? 9/30/2021), Y13061 (10/01/2020 ? 9/30/2021), S22AF00017 (1/01/2022 ? 12/31/2024), S21AF10050 (6/01/2021 ? 5/31/2024), S21AF10015 (1/01/2021 ? 12/31/2023), S20AF20092 (10/01/2020 ? 9/30/2023), S20AF20006 (1/01/2020 ? 12/31/2022), S19AF20006 (1/01/2019 ? 12/31/2021), S19AF20004 (12/01/2018 ? 11/30/2023), S18AF20004 (11/01/2017 ? 10/31/2023), ERAE0131 (1/19/2021 ? 12/29/2022), ERAE0333 (5/11/2021 ? 12/30/2025), S010A210038 (7/01/2021 ? 9/30/2022), S010A200038 (7/01/2020 ? 9/30/2021), H027A210093 (7/01/2021 ? 9/30/2022), H027A200093 (7/01/2020 ? 9/30/2021), S425D200028 (3/13/2020 ? 9/30/2022), S425D210028 (3/13/2020 ? 9/30/2022), 2201PATANF (10/01/2021 ? 9/30/2022), 2101PATANF (10/01/2020 ? 9/30/2021), 2001PATANF (10/01/2019 ? 9/30/2020), 2201PACSES (10/01/2021 ? 9/30/2022), 2101PACSES (10/01/2020 ? 9/30/2021), G2201PACCDF (10/01/2021 ? 9/30/2022), G2101PACCDF (10/01/2020 ? 9/30/2021), 2201PAFOST (10/01/2021 ? 9/30/2022), 2101PAFOST (10/01/2020 ? 9/30/2021), 2001PAFOST (10/01/2019 ? 9/30/2020), 2201PAADPT (10/01/2021 ? 9/30/2022), 2101PAADPT (10/01/2020 ? 9/30/2021), 2205PA5MAP (10/01/2021 ? 9/30/2022), 2105PA5MAP (10/01/2020 ? 9/30/2021) Finding 2022 ? 014: (continued) Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency, Noncompliance for Medicaid Cluster Material Weakness, Material Noncompliance for Other Programs Compliance Requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Condition: Under the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania's (Commonwealth) implementation of the Single Audit Act, review and resolution of subrecipient Single Audit reports is split into two stages. The Office of the Budget?s Bureau of Accounting and Financial Management (OB-BAFM) ensures the reports meet technical standards through a centralized desk review process. The various funding agencies in the Commonwealth are responsible for making a management decision on each finding within six months of the Federal Audit Clearinghouse?s (FAC) Management Decision Letter (MDL) start date for audits subject to Uniform Guidance and to ensure appropriate corrective action is taken by the subrecipient (except for Uniform Guidance audits under U.S. Department of Labor programs which are permitted 12 months for management decisions in accordance with 2 CFR Section 2900.21). Each Commonwealth agency is also responsible for reviewing financial information in each audit report to determine whether the audit included all pass-through funding provided by the agency in order to ensure pass-through funds were subject to audit. Most agencies meet this requirement by performing Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) reconciliations. The agency is also required to adjust Commonwealth records, if necessary. Our fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 audit of the Commonwealth?s process for review and resolution of subrecipient Single Audits included an evaluation of the Commonwealth?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2021 subrecipient audit universe for audits due for submission to the FAC during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2022. We also evaluated the Commonwealth?s review of 44 subrecipient audit reports with findings in major programs/clusters which were identified on the Commonwealth agencies? tracking lists during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 and required management decisions by Commonwealth agencies. Our testing disclosed the following audit exceptions regarding the Commonwealth agencies? review of subrecipient audit reports: ? Department of Education (PDE): The time period for making a management decision on findings was approximately 6.5 to over 13 months after the FAC MDL start date for 14 out of 25 audit reports with findings. Three of the 14 audit reports were improperly classified on PDE?s audit tracking list as not having federal award findings. ? Department of Environmental Protection (DEP): The time period for making a management decision on findings was approximately 16.2 months after the FAC MDL start date for one out of three audit reports with findings. In addition, our review disclosed that DEP subgranted federal funds totaling $10,338,570 to one subrecipient during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020, for which a Single Audit was not submitted to the FAC as of our January 2023 testing date. This was over 9.5 months after the March 31, 2022 due date, which had been extended due to the COVID-19 pandemic in accordance with the Office of Management and Budget?s (OMB) Memorandum M-21-20, Appendix 3. ? Department of Health (DOH): Our review disclosed that DOH subgranted federal funds totaling $8,103,407 to one subrecipient during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2020, for which a Single Audit was not submitted to the FAC as of our January 2023 testing date. This was over 12.5 months after the December 31, 2021 due date, which had been extended in accordance with OMB?s Memorandum M-21-20, Appendix 3. ? Department of Human Services (DHS): The time period for making a management decision on findings ranged from approximately 6.6 months to over 19.6 months after the FAC MDL start date for 12 out of 14 subrecipient audit reports with findings. There was also a delay in DHS?s procedures to ensure the subrecipient SEFAs were accurate so that major programs were properly determined and subjected to audit. Finding 2022 ? 014: (continued) As a follow-up to the prior year finding, we noted that the Commonwealth subgranted federal funds totaling $327,988,063 to the City of Philadelphia during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2021, for which a Single Audit was not submitted to the FAC as of our January 2023 testing date. This was over 3.5 months after the September 30, 2022 due date, which had been extended in accordance with OMB?s Memorandum M-21-20, Appendix 3. Our testing disclosed that DHS?s subgrants to the City of Philadelphia were material for five of the 16 major programs/clusters with material subgranted funds. Our follow-up on the prior year finding also disclosed that the Commonwealth subgranted federal funds totaling $28,725,212 to Bucks County during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020, for which a Single Audit was not submitted to the FAC as of our January 2023 testing date. This was over 9.5 months after the March 31, 2022 due date, which had been extended in accordance with OMB?s Memorandum M-21-20, Appendix 3. DHS was the lead agency for the City of Philadelphia and Bucks County audits. Criteria: 2 CFR ?200.332, Requirements for pass-through entities, states in part: All pass-through entities must: (d) Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward, and that subaward performance goals are achieved. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: (2) Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity detected through audits, on-site reviews, and written confirmation from the subrecipient, highlighting the status of actions planned or taken to address Single Audit findings related to the particular subaward. (3) Issuing a management decision for applicable audit findings pertaining only to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity as required by ?200.521 [Management decision]. (f) Verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F [Audit Requirements] of this part when it is expected that the subrecipient?s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in ?200.501 [Audit requirements]. (g) Consider whether the results of the subrecipient?s audit, on-site review, or other monitoring indicate conditions that necessitate adjustments to the pass-through entity?s own records. (h) Consider taking enforcement action against noncompliant subrecipients as described in ?200.339 [Remedies for noncompliance] of this part and in program regulations. In order to carry out these responsibilities properly, good internal control dictates that state pass-through agencies ensure subrecipient Single Audit SEFAs are representative of state payment records each year, and that the related federal programs have been properly subjected to Single Audit procedures. 2 CFR ?200.512, Report submission, states in part: (a) General. (1) The audit must be completed and the data collection form described in paragraph (b) of this section and reporting package described in paragraph (c) of this section must be submitted within the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor?s report(s), or nine months after the end of the audit period. If the due date falls on a Saturday, Sunday, or Federal holiday, the reporting package is due the next business day. Finding 2022 ? 014: (continued) 2 CFR ?200.521, Management decision, states in part: (a) General. The management decision must clearly state whether or not the finding is sustained, the reasons for the decision, and the expected auditee action to repay disallowed costs, make financial adjustments, or take other action. (d) Time requirements. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity responsible for issuing a management decision must do so within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. The auditee must initiate and proceed with corrective action as rapidly as possible and corrective action should begin no later than upon receipt of the audit report. 2 CFR ?200.505, Sanctions, states: In cases of continued inability or unwillingness to have an audit conducted in accordance with this part, Federal agencies and pass-through entities must take appropriate action as provided in ?200.339 [Remedies for noncompliance]. 2 CFR ?200.339, Remedies for noncompliance, states in part: If a non-Federal entity fails to comply with the U.S. Constitution, Federal statutes, regulations or the terms and conditions of a Federal award, the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may impose additional conditions, as described in ?200.208 [Specific conditions]. If the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity determines that noncompliance cannot be remedied by imposing additional conditions, the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may take one or more of the following actions, as appropriate in the circumstances. (a) Temporarily withhold cash payments pending correction of the deficiency by the non-Federal entity or more severe enforcement action by the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity. (b) Disallow (that is, deny both use of funds and any applicable matching credit for) all or part of the cost of the activity or action not in compliance. (c) Wholly or partly suspend or terminate the Federal award. (d) Initiate suspension or debarment proceedings as authorized under 2 CFR Part 180 and Federal awarding agency regulations (or in the case of a pass-through entity, recommend such a proceeding be initiated by a Federal awarding agency). (e) Withhold further Federal awards for the project or program. (f) Take other remedies that may be legally available. To ensure Commonwealth enforcement of federal regulations for subrecipient noncompliance with audit requirements, Commonwealth Management Directive 325.08, Amended ? Remedies for Recipient Noncompliance with Audit Requirements, Section 5 related to policy, states in part: (a) Agencies must develop and implement remedial action that reflects the unique requirements of each program? (b) The remedial action should be implemented within six months from the date the first remedial action is initiated. At the end of the six-month period, the recipient should take the appropriate corrective action or the final stage of remedial action should be imposed on the recipient. Examples of remedial action include, but are not limited to: Finding 2022 ? 014: (continued) (1) Meeting or calling the recipient to explain the importance and benefits of the audit and audit resolution processes, emphasizing the value of the audit as an administrative tool and the Commonwealth?s reliance on an acceptable audit and prompt resolution as evidence of the recipient?s ability to properly administer the program. (2) Encouraging the entity to establish an audit committee or designate an individual as the single point of contact to: (a) Communicate regarding the audit. (b) Arrange for and oversee the audit. (c) Direct and monitor audit resolution. (3) Providing technical assistance to the recipient in devising and implementing an appropriate plan to remedy the noncompliance. (4) Withholding a portion of assistance payments until the noncompliance is resolved. (5) Withholding or disallowing overhead costs until the noncompliance is resolved. (6) Suspending the assistance agreement until the noncompliance is resolved. (7) Terminating the assistance agreement with the recipient and, if necessary, seeking alternative entities to administer the program. Management Directive 325.09, Amended ? Processing Subrecipient Single Audits of Federal Pass-Through Funds, Section 7 related to procedures, states in part: c. Agencies. (1) Evaluate single audit report submissions received from BAFM to determine program purpose acceptability by verifying, at a minimum, that all agency-funded programs are properly included on the applicable financial schedules; that findings affecting the agency contain sufficient information to facilitate a management decision; and that the subrecipient has submitted an adequate corrective action plan. (6) Issue management decisions relative to audit findings and crosscutting findings assigned to the agency for resolution, as required by 2 CFR ?200.521. If responsible for the resolution of crosscutting findings, notify the affected agency or agencies upon resolution of such findings. (7) Impose or coordinate the imposition of remedial action in accordance with 2 CFR Part 200.339 and Management Directive 325.08 Amended, Remedies for Recipient Noncompliance with Audit Requirements, when subrecipients fail to comply with the provisions of Subpart F. Management Directive 325.12, Amended ? Standards for Enterprise Risk Management in Commonwealth Agencies, adopted the internal control framework outlined in the United States Government Accountability Office?s, Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government (Green Book). The Green Book states in part: Management should establish and operate monitoring activities to monitor the internal control system and evaluate the results. Management should remediate identified internal control deficiencies on a timely basis. Cause: One reason provided by Commonwealth management for untimely audit resolution in the various agencies, including making management decisions, approving corrective action, and performing procedures to ensure the accuracy of subrecipient SEFAs, was either a change in staff or a lack of staff to follow up and process subrecipient audit reports more timely. The late management decision at DEP appeared to be the result of a subrecipient being treated as a contractor as described in current year Single Audit Finding #2022-005, despite having a subrecipient Single Audit requirement clause in its contract with DEP. Regarding late and outstanding audit report submissions, the Commonwealth agencies did not appear to be timely implementing remedial action steps in accordance with 2 CFR ?200.339 and Commonwealth Management Directive 325.8 in order to ensure compliance with federal audit submission requirements. Finding 2022 ? 014: (continued) Effect: Since required management decisions were not made within six months to ensure appropriate corrective action was taken on audits received from subrecipients, the Commonwealth did not comply with federal regulations, and subrecipients were not made aware of acceptance or rejection of corrective action plans in a timely manner. Further, noncompliance may recur in future periods if control deficiencies are not corrected on a timely basis, and there is an increased risk of unallowable charges being made to federal programs if corrective action and recovery of questioned costs is not timely. Regarding the SEFA reviews or alternate procedures which are not being performed timely and the late Single Audit report submissions, there is an increased risk that subrecipients could be misspending and/or inappropriately tracking and reporting federal funds over multiple year periods, and these discrepancies may not be properly monitored, detected, and corrected by agency personnel on a timely basis as required. Finally, additional federal pass-through funds may be unaudited in the future without timely and effective remedial action from Commonwealth agencies to enforce compliance. Recommendation: We recommend that the above weaknesses that cause untimely subrecipient Single Audit resolution, including untimely management decisions on findings, untimely review of the SEFA or alternate procedures, and late audit report submissions be corrected to ensure compliance with federal requirements and Commonwealth Management Directives, and to better ensure timelier subrecipient compliance with program requirements. Commonwealth agencies should promptly pursue outstanding audits and implement remedial action steps on a timely basis in accordance with 2 CFR ?200.339 and Commonwealth Management Directive 325.08. PDE Response: PDE agrees with the finding. DEP Response: DEP agrees with the finding. DOH Response: DOH agrees with the finding. DHS Response: While DHS agrees with this finding, we believe we are in compliance with 2 CFR ?200.339 and Commonwealth Management Directive 325.08 related to outstanding audits. We continue to work with counties and their independent auditors to obtain any late Single Audit reports, and albeit late, we do receive them which is the ultimate goal. Questioned Costs: The amount of questioned costs cannot be determined. The corrective action plan for this finding, if any, has not been reviewed by the auditors. See Corrective Action Plans located elsewhere in this Report.
Various Agencies Finding 2022 ? 014: ALN 10.553, 10.555, 10.556, 10.559, and 10.582 ? Child Nutrition Cluster (including COVID-19) ALN 10.557 ? WIC Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (including COVID-19) ALN 10.558 ? Child and Adult Care Food Program (including COVID-19) ALN 15.252 ? Abandoned Mine Land Reclamation ALN 21.023 ? COVID-19 ? Emergency Rental Assistance Program ALN 84.010 ? Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies ALN 84.027 and 84.173 ? ? Special Education Cluster (IDEA) (including COVID-19) ALN 84.425C ? COVID 19 ? Education Stabilization Fund - GEER Fund ALN 84.425D ? COVID 19 ? Education Stabilization Fund - ESSER Fund ALN 84.425R ? COVID 19 ? Education Stabilization Fund - CRRSA EANS ALN 84.425U ? COVID 19 ? Education Stabilization Fund - ARP ESSER ALN 84.425W ? COVID 19 ? Education Stabilization Fund - ARP ESSER HCY ALN 93.558 ? Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (including COVID-19) ALN 93.563 ? Child Support Enforcement ALN 93.575 and 93.596 ? Child Care and Development Fund (CCDF) Cluster (including COVID-19) ALN 93.658 ? Foster Care ? Title IV-E (including COVID-19) ALN 93.659 ? Adoption Assistance (including COVID-19) ALN 93.775, 93.777, and 93.778 ? Medicaid Cluster (including COVID-19) A Material Weakness and Material Noncompliance Exist in the Commonwealth?s Subrecipient Audit Resolution Process (A Similar Condition Was Noted in Prior Year Finding 2021-015) Federal Grant Number(s) and Year(s): 1PA300365 (1/01/2022 ? 9/30/2023), 1PA310305 (10/01/2021 ? 9/30/2022), 1PA310305 (10/01/2020 ? 9/30/2021), 1PA300305 (10/01/2021 ? 9/30/2022), 1PA300305 (10/01/2020 ? 9/30/2021), 1PA320305 (12/27/2020 ? 9/30/2021), Y22174 (10/01/2021 ? 9/30/2024), Y13194 (10/01/2020 ? 9/30/2023), Y03194 (10/01/2019 ? 9/30/2023), Y03191 (10/01/2019 ? 9/30/2020), Y22173 (10/01/2021 ? 9/30/2022), Y22172 (10/01/2021 ? 9/30/2022, Y13191 (10/01/2020 ? 9/30/2021), Y13061 (10/01/2020 ? 9/30/2021), S22AF00017 (1/01/2022 ? 12/31/2024), S21AF10050 (6/01/2021 ? 5/31/2024), S21AF10015 (1/01/2021 ? 12/31/2023), S20AF20092 (10/01/2020 ? 9/30/2023), S20AF20006 (1/01/2020 ? 12/31/2022), S19AF20006 (1/01/2019 ? 12/31/2021), S19AF20004 (12/01/2018 ? 11/30/2023), S18AF20004 (11/01/2017 ? 10/31/2023), ERAE0131 (1/19/2021 ? 12/29/2022), ERAE0333 (5/11/2021 ? 12/30/2025), S010A210038 (7/01/2021 ? 9/30/2022), S010A200038 (7/01/2020 ? 9/30/2021), H027A210093 (7/01/2021 ? 9/30/2022), H027A200093 (7/01/2020 ? 9/30/2021), S425D200028 (3/13/2020 ? 9/30/2022), S425D210028 (3/13/2020 ? 9/30/2022), 2201PATANF (10/01/2021 ? 9/30/2022), 2101PATANF (10/01/2020 ? 9/30/2021), 2001PATANF (10/01/2019 ? 9/30/2020), 2201PACSES (10/01/2021 ? 9/30/2022), 2101PACSES (10/01/2020 ? 9/30/2021), G2201PACCDF (10/01/2021 ? 9/30/2022), G2101PACCDF (10/01/2020 ? 9/30/2021), 2201PAFOST (10/01/2021 ? 9/30/2022), 2101PAFOST (10/01/2020 ? 9/30/2021), 2001PAFOST (10/01/2019 ? 9/30/2020), 2201PAADPT (10/01/2021 ? 9/30/2022), 2101PAADPT (10/01/2020 ? 9/30/2021), 2205PA5MAP (10/01/2021 ? 9/30/2022), 2105PA5MAP (10/01/2020 ? 9/30/2021) Finding 2022 ? 014: (continued) Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency, Noncompliance for Medicaid Cluster Material Weakness, Material Noncompliance for Other Programs Compliance Requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Condition: Under the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania's (Commonwealth) implementation of the Single Audit Act, review and resolution of subrecipient Single Audit reports is split into two stages. The Office of the Budget?s Bureau of Accounting and Financial Management (OB-BAFM) ensures the reports meet technical standards through a centralized desk review process. The various funding agencies in the Commonwealth are responsible for making a management decision on each finding within six months of the Federal Audit Clearinghouse?s (FAC) Management Decision Letter (MDL) start date for audits subject to Uniform Guidance and to ensure appropriate corrective action is taken by the subrecipient (except for Uniform Guidance audits under U.S. Department of Labor programs which are permitted 12 months for management decisions in accordance with 2 CFR Section 2900.21). Each Commonwealth agency is also responsible for reviewing financial information in each audit report to determine whether the audit included all pass-through funding provided by the agency in order to ensure pass-through funds were subject to audit. Most agencies meet this requirement by performing Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) reconciliations. The agency is also required to adjust Commonwealth records, if necessary. Our fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 audit of the Commonwealth?s process for review and resolution of subrecipient Single Audits included an evaluation of the Commonwealth?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2021 subrecipient audit universe for audits due for submission to the FAC during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2022. We also evaluated the Commonwealth?s review of 44 subrecipient audit reports with findings in major programs/clusters which were identified on the Commonwealth agencies? tracking lists during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 and required management decisions by Commonwealth agencies. Our testing disclosed the following audit exceptions regarding the Commonwealth agencies? review of subrecipient audit reports: ? Department of Education (PDE): The time period for making a management decision on findings was approximately 6.5 to over 13 months after the FAC MDL start date for 14 out of 25 audit reports with findings. Three of the 14 audit reports were improperly classified on PDE?s audit tracking list as not having federal award findings. ? Department of Environmental Protection (DEP): The time period for making a management decision on findings was approximately 16.2 months after the FAC MDL start date for one out of three audit reports with findings. In addition, our review disclosed that DEP subgranted federal funds totaling $10,338,570 to one subrecipient during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020, for which a Single Audit was not submitted to the FAC as of our January 2023 testing date. This was over 9.5 months after the March 31, 2022 due date, which had been extended due to the COVID-19 pandemic in accordance with the Office of Management and Budget?s (OMB) Memorandum M-21-20, Appendix 3. ? Department of Health (DOH): Our review disclosed that DOH subgranted federal funds totaling $8,103,407 to one subrecipient during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2020, for which a Single Audit was not submitted to the FAC as of our January 2023 testing date. This was over 12.5 months after the December 31, 2021 due date, which had been extended in accordance with OMB?s Memorandum M-21-20, Appendix 3. ? Department of Human Services (DHS): The time period for making a management decision on findings ranged from approximately 6.6 months to over 19.6 months after the FAC MDL start date for 12 out of 14 subrecipient audit reports with findings. There was also a delay in DHS?s procedures to ensure the subrecipient SEFAs were accurate so that major programs were properly determined and subjected to audit. Finding 2022 ? 014: (continued) As a follow-up to the prior year finding, we noted that the Commonwealth subgranted federal funds totaling $327,988,063 to the City of Philadelphia during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2021, for which a Single Audit was not submitted to the FAC as of our January 2023 testing date. This was over 3.5 months after the September 30, 2022 due date, which had been extended in accordance with OMB?s Memorandum M-21-20, Appendix 3. Our testing disclosed that DHS?s subgrants to the City of Philadelphia were material for five of the 16 major programs/clusters with material subgranted funds. Our follow-up on the prior year finding also disclosed that the Commonwealth subgranted federal funds totaling $28,725,212 to Bucks County during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020, for which a Single Audit was not submitted to the FAC as of our January 2023 testing date. This was over 9.5 months after the March 31, 2022 due date, which had been extended in accordance with OMB?s Memorandum M-21-20, Appendix 3. DHS was the lead agency for the City of Philadelphia and Bucks County audits. Criteria: 2 CFR ?200.332, Requirements for pass-through entities, states in part: All pass-through entities must: (d) Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward, and that subaward performance goals are achieved. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: (2) Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity detected through audits, on-site reviews, and written confirmation from the subrecipient, highlighting the status of actions planned or taken to address Single Audit findings related to the particular subaward. (3) Issuing a management decision for applicable audit findings pertaining only to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity as required by ?200.521 [Management decision]. (f) Verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F [Audit Requirements] of this part when it is expected that the subrecipient?s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in ?200.501 [Audit requirements]. (g) Consider whether the results of the subrecipient?s audit, on-site review, or other monitoring indicate conditions that necessitate adjustments to the pass-through entity?s own records. (h) Consider taking enforcement action against noncompliant subrecipients as described in ?200.339 [Remedies for noncompliance] of this part and in program regulations. In order to carry out these responsibilities properly, good internal control dictates that state pass-through agencies ensure subrecipient Single Audit SEFAs are representative of state payment records each year, and that the related federal programs have been properly subjected to Single Audit procedures. 2 CFR ?200.512, Report submission, states in part: (a) General. (1) The audit must be completed and the data collection form described in paragraph (b) of this section and reporting package described in paragraph (c) of this section must be submitted within the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor?s report(s), or nine months after the end of the audit period. If the due date falls on a Saturday, Sunday, or Federal holiday, the reporting package is due the next business day. Finding 2022 ? 014: (continued) 2 CFR ?200.521, Management decision, states in part: (a) General. The management decision must clearly state whether or not the finding is sustained, the reasons for the decision, and the expected auditee action to repay disallowed costs, make financial adjustments, or take other action. (d) Time requirements. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity responsible for issuing a management decision must do so within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. The auditee must initiate and proceed with corrective action as rapidly as possible and corrective action should begin no later than upon receipt of the audit report. 2 CFR ?200.505, Sanctions, states: In cases of continued inability or unwillingness to have an audit conducted in accordance with this part, Federal agencies and pass-through entities must take appropriate action as provided in ?200.339 [Remedies for noncompliance]. 2 CFR ?200.339, Remedies for noncompliance, states in part: If a non-Federal entity fails to comply with the U.S. Constitution, Federal statutes, regulations or the terms and conditions of a Federal award, the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may impose additional conditions, as described in ?200.208 [Specific conditions]. If the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity determines that noncompliance cannot be remedied by imposing additional conditions, the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may take one or more of the following actions, as appropriate in the circumstances. (a) Temporarily withhold cash payments pending correction of the deficiency by the non-Federal entity or more severe enforcement action by the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity. (b) Disallow (that is, deny both use of funds and any applicable matching credit for) all or part of the cost of the activity or action not in compliance. (c) Wholly or partly suspend or terminate the Federal award. (d) Initiate suspension or debarment proceedings as authorized under 2 CFR Part 180 and Federal awarding agency regulations (or in the case of a pass-through entity, recommend such a proceeding be initiated by a Federal awarding agency). (e) Withhold further Federal awards for the project or program. (f) Take other remedies that may be legally available. To ensure Commonwealth enforcement of federal regulations for subrecipient noncompliance with audit requirements, Commonwealth Management Directive 325.08, Amended ? Remedies for Recipient Noncompliance with Audit Requirements, Section 5 related to policy, states in part: (a) Agencies must develop and implement remedial action that reflects the unique requirements of each program? (b) The remedial action should be implemented within six months from the date the first remedial action is initiated. At the end of the six-month period, the recipient should take the appropriate corrective action or the final stage of remedial action should be imposed on the recipient. Examples of remedial action include, but are not limited to: Finding 2022 ? 014: (continued) (1) Meeting or calling the recipient to explain the importance and benefits of the audit and audit resolution processes, emphasizing the value of the audit as an administrative tool and the Commonwealth?s reliance on an acceptable audit and prompt resolution as evidence of the recipient?s ability to properly administer the program. (2) Encouraging the entity to establish an audit committee or designate an individual as the single point of contact to: (a) Communicate regarding the audit. (b) Arrange for and oversee the audit. (c) Direct and monitor audit resolution. (3) Providing technical assistance to the recipient in devising and implementing an appropriate plan to remedy the noncompliance. (4) Withholding a portion of assistance payments until the noncompliance is resolved. (5) Withholding or disallowing overhead costs until the noncompliance is resolved. (6) Suspending the assistance agreement until the noncompliance is resolved. (7) Terminating the assistance agreement with the recipient and, if necessary, seeking alternative entities to administer the program. Management Directive 325.09, Amended ? Processing Subrecipient Single Audits of Federal Pass-Through Funds, Section 7 related to procedures, states in part: c. Agencies. (1) Evaluate single audit report submissions received from BAFM to determine program purpose acceptability by verifying, at a minimum, that all agency-funded programs are properly included on the applicable financial schedules; that findings affecting the agency contain sufficient information to facilitate a management decision; and that the subrecipient has submitted an adequate corrective action plan. (6) Issue management decisions relative to audit findings and crosscutting findings assigned to the agency for resolution, as required by 2 CFR ?200.521. If responsible for the resolution of crosscutting findings, notify the affected agency or agencies upon resolution of such findings. (7) Impose or coordinate the imposition of remedial action in accordance with 2 CFR Part 200.339 and Management Directive 325.08 Amended, Remedies for Recipient Noncompliance with Audit Requirements, when subrecipients fail to comply with the provisions of Subpart F. Management Directive 325.12, Amended ? Standards for Enterprise Risk Management in Commonwealth Agencies, adopted the internal control framework outlined in the United States Government Accountability Office?s, Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government (Green Book). The Green Book states in part: Management should establish and operate monitoring activities to monitor the internal control system and evaluate the results. Management should remediate identified internal control deficiencies on a timely basis. Cause: One reason provided by Commonwealth management for untimely audit resolution in the various agencies, including making management decisions, approving corrective action, and performing procedures to ensure the accuracy of subrecipient SEFAs, was either a change in staff or a lack of staff to follow up and process subrecipient audit reports more timely. The late management decision at DEP appeared to be the result of a subrecipient being treated as a contractor as described in current year Single Audit Finding #2022-005, despite having a subrecipient Single Audit requirement clause in its contract with DEP. Regarding late and outstanding audit report submissions, the Commonwealth agencies did not appear to be timely implementing remedial action steps in accordance with 2 CFR ?200.339 and Commonwealth Management Directive 325.8 in order to ensure compliance with federal audit submission requirements. Finding 2022 ? 014: (continued) Effect: Since required management decisions were not made within six months to ensure appropriate corrective action was taken on audits received from subrecipients, the Commonwealth did not comply with federal regulations, and subrecipients were not made aware of acceptance or rejection of corrective action plans in a timely manner. Further, noncompliance may recur in future periods if control deficiencies are not corrected on a timely basis, and there is an increased risk of unallowable charges being made to federal programs if corrective action and recovery of questioned costs is not timely. Regarding the SEFA reviews or alternate procedures which are not being performed timely and the late Single Audit report submissions, there is an increased risk that subrecipients could be misspending and/or inappropriately tracking and reporting federal funds over multiple year periods, and these discrepancies may not be properly monitored, detected, and corrected by agency personnel on a timely basis as required. Finally, additional federal pass-through funds may be unaudited in the future without timely and effective remedial action from Commonwealth agencies to enforce compliance. Recommendation: We recommend that the above weaknesses that cause untimely subrecipient Single Audit resolution, including untimely management decisions on findings, untimely review of the SEFA or alternate procedures, and late audit report submissions be corrected to ensure compliance with federal requirements and Commonwealth Management Directives, and to better ensure timelier subrecipient compliance with program requirements. Commonwealth agencies should promptly pursue outstanding audits and implement remedial action steps on a timely basis in accordance with 2 CFR ?200.339 and Commonwealth Management Directive 325.08. PDE Response: PDE agrees with the finding. DEP Response: DEP agrees with the finding. DOH Response: DOH agrees with the finding. DHS Response: While DHS agrees with this finding, we believe we are in compliance with 2 CFR ?200.339 and Commonwealth Management Directive 325.08 related to outstanding audits. We continue to work with counties and their independent auditors to obtain any late Single Audit reports, and albeit late, we do receive them which is the ultimate goal. Questioned Costs: The amount of questioned costs cannot be determined. The corrective action plan for this finding, if any, has not been reviewed by the auditors. See Corrective Action Plans located elsewhere in this Report.