Criteria: The Uniform Guidance requires nonfederal entities that receive federal awards to establish written policies, procedures, or standards of conduct as described in the following sections: Financial management (2 CFR 200.302) Payment (2 CFR 200.305) General procurement standards (2 CFR 200.318) Competition (2 CFR 200.319) Methods of procurement to be followed (2 CFR 200.320) Compensation ? personal services (2 CFR 200.430) Compensation ? fringe benefits (2 CFR 200.431) Transportation costs (2 CFR 200.474) Condition: The Town did not have written policies, procedures, and standards of conduct relative to federal awards as required by the Uniform Guidance. Cause: The Town was not aware of these requirements. Effect: The Town is not in compliance with the Uniform Guidance with respect to these written policies. Recommendation: We recommend that the Town update its policies and procedures to comply with the Uniform Guidance requirements mentioned above. Management?s Response: We agree that our existing policies do not explicitly address federal award compliance requirements. We will be updating the Town?s procedures and policies to incorporate the requirements of Part 200 of the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards.
Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Written Policies ALN Number: 10.664 Grant Number: 18-DG-11020000-050 Criteria: Title 2 of the U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) ? 180.300 (January 1, 2021) requires non-federal entities to verify an entity is not excluded or disqualified prior to entering into a covered transaction by, ?(a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that [entity]; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that [entity].? A good internal control plan requires adequate procedures to ensure the County has proper procedures in place to verify that contractors paid with grant funds are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal programs or activities. The Uniform Guidance requires nonfederal entities that receive federal awards to establish written policies, procedures, and or/standards of conduct, except if excluded in compliance supplement. There are four basic reasons for creating an internal control system through defining and documenting processes with well written policies and procedures: 1.Compliance 2.Operational Needs 3.Managing Risks 4.Continuous Improvement Complying with laws and regulations should be a critical function of the County. Well-defined and documented processes (i.e. procedures, training manuals) along with records that demonstrate process capability can make evident an effective internal control system and compliance to Federal guidelines. Another important role of documentation of procedures is to ensure processes fundamental to the County are properly guided by County?s officials, and are consistent way that meets the County?s needs, and that are important related information and data are captured and communicated. Documentation of procedures are important for controlling process, documenting the standard work that was performed and training new employees. Condition: The County lacks certain written policies and procedures required by Uniform Guidance. Although the County has an outdated Accounting Policy, certain policies for Federal Expenditures need to be updated and added. These include: 1. Financial management (200.302) 2.Payment (200.305) 3.General procurement standards (200.318) 4.Competition (200.319) 5.Methods of procurement to be followed (200.320) 6.Compensation ? personal services (200.430) 7.Compensation ? fringe benefits (200.431) 8.Relocation costs of employees (200.464) 9.Travel costs (200.474) Cause: Appears to be the result of a lack of training coupled with limited staffing and resources. Questioned Costs: None Context for Calculation Of Questioned Costs: None Effect: Without adequate procedures to ensure contractors are not suspended, debarred or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal programs or activities, there is an increased risk for the misuse of Federal funds and noncompliance with Federal regulations. Recommendation: We recommend the County implement procedures to ensure, prior to entering into a covered transaction, that a contractor in not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal programs or activities, and that procedures is adequately documented. Furthermore, the County should familiarize themselves with the Uniform Guidance and implement the following: 1.Develop and document all of its significant processes over federal awards. 2.Make the written policies and procedures available to all personnel and departments within the County 3.Ensure the written policies and procedures are accurate, complete, and current at all times (The Board of County Commissioners should update the policy on an annual basis.) 4.Revise policies and procedures for changes in business processes and policies over federal awards 5.Communicate significant changes to all affected personnel immediately to ensure they are aware of any revisions to their Responsibilities to the federal award. 6.Document policies and procedures to facilitate training and provide guidelines relative to federal awards for changes in personnel.
Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Written Policies ALN Number: 10.664 Grant Number: 18-DG-11020000-050 Criteria: Title 2 of the U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) ? 180.300 (January 1, 2021) requires non-federal entities to verify an entity is not excluded or disqualified prior to entering into a covered transaction by, ?(a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that [entity]; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that [entity].? A good internal control plan requires adequate procedures to ensure the County has proper procedures in place to verify that contractors paid with grant funds are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal programs or activities. The Uniform Guidance requires nonfederal entities that receive federal awards to establish written policies, procedures, and or/standards of conduct, except if excluded in compliance supplement. There are four basic reasons for creating an internal control system through defining and documenting processes with well written policies and procedures: 1.Compliance 2.Operational Needs 3.Managing Risks 4.Continuous Improvement Complying with laws and regulations should be a critical function of the County. Well-defined and documented processes (i.e. procedures, training manuals) along with records that demonstrate process capability can make evident an effective internal control system and compliance to Federal guidelines. Another important role of documentation of procedures is to ensure processes fundamental to the County are properly guided by County?s officials, and are consistent way that meets the County?s needs, and that are important related information and data are captured and communicated. Documentation of procedures are important for controlling process, documenting the standard work that was performed and training new employees. Condition: The County lacks certain written policies and procedures required by Uniform Guidance. Although the County has an outdated Accounting Policy, certain policies for Federal Expenditures need to be updated and added. These include: 1. Financial management (200.302) 2.Payment (200.305) 3.General procurement standards (200.318) 4.Competition (200.319) 5.Methods of procurement to be followed (200.320) 6.Compensation ? personal services (200.430) 7.Compensation ? fringe benefits (200.431) 8.Relocation costs of employees (200.464) 9.Travel costs (200.474) Cause: Appears to be the result of a lack of training coupled with limited staffing and resources. Questioned Costs: None Context for Calculation Of Questioned Costs: None Effect: Without adequate procedures to ensure contractors are not suspended, debarred or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal programs or activities, there is an increased risk for the misuse of Federal funds and noncompliance with Federal regulations. Recommendation: We recommend the County implement procedures to ensure, prior to entering into a covered transaction, that a contractor in not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal programs or activities, and that procedures is adequately documented. Furthermore, the County should familiarize themselves with the Uniform Guidance and implement the following: 1.Develop and document all of its significant processes over federal awards. 2.Make the written policies and procedures available to all personnel and departments within the County 3.Ensure the written policies and procedures are accurate, complete, and current at all times (The Board of County Commissioners should update the policy on an annual basis.) 4.Revise policies and procedures for changes in business processes and policies over federal awards 5.Communicate significant changes to all affected personnel immediately to ensure they are aware of any revisions to their Responsibilities to the federal award. 6.Document policies and procedures to facilitate training and provide guidelines relative to federal awards for changes in personnel.
2022 ? 003 Allowable Activities and Costs - Payroll Disbursements Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Centers for Disease Control and Prevention U.S. Department of Health & Human Services Federal Program Name: COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF) COVID-19 Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases (ELC) Child Support Enforcement Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 93.323 93.563 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: 1505-0271 - 2021 6NU50CK000539-01-08 DHHS-CDC - 2020 Pass-Through Agency: California Department of Public Health Heluna Health California Department of Child Support Services Pass-Through Number(s): COVID-19ELC29 and COVID-19ELC87 0187.3380 21-06 Award Period: May 26, 2021 - December 31, 2026 May 18, 2020 - November 17, 2022 and January 15, 2021 - July 31, 2023 May 1, 2020 - March 31, 2022 July 1, 2021 - June 30, 2022 Type of Finding: ? Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance ? Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: According to the Assistance Listing Description for CSLFRF and ELC, Subpart D, Post Federal; Award Requirements and Subpart E, Cost Principles apply to the assistance listing. According to the LCSA Fiscal and Administrative Policy Manual Revised 2021, costs allowable for reimbursement under the Child Support IV-D award are governed by federal regulations. Title 2, ?200.403, ?200.404, and Title 45, Part 304 provide general guidelines for determining cost allowability. According to ? 200.302 Financial management of 2 CFR Part 200, the financial management system of each nonfederal entity must provide for written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with subpart E of this part and the terms and conditions of the federal award. According to ? 200.303 Internal controls of 2 CFR Part 200, the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. According to ? 200.403 Factors affecting allowability of costs of 2 CFR Part 200, except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the nonfederal entity in order to be allowable under federal awards. According to ? 200.430 Compensation?personal services of 2 CFR Part 200, costs of compensation are allowable to the extent that they satisfy the specific requirements of this part, and that the total compensation for individual employees: 1. Is reasonable for the services rendered and conforms to the established written policy of the nonfederal entity consistently applied to both federal and nonfederal activities; 2. Follows an appointment made in accordance with a nonfederal entity's laws and/or rules or written policies and meets the requirements of federal statute, where applicable; and 3. Is determined and supported as provided in paragraph (i) of this section, when applicable. According to ? 200.431 Compensation-fringe benefits of 2 CFR Part 200, except as provided elsewhere in these principles, the costs of fringe benefits are allowable provided that the benefits are reasonable and are required by law, nonfederal entity-employee agreement, or an established policy of the nonfederal entity. Condition: The County does not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs nor an established written policy for compensation-personal services and fringe benefits. Questioned costs: Unknown Context: During our testing, we noted the County charged various types of salaries and benefits to the grants. The County does not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs. Specific to compensation-personal services and fringe benefits, there is not an established written policy for us to test that personnel costs charged to grants conform to, follows an appointment in accordance with, and are required by an established policy of the County. Cause: Management oversight. Effect: The auditor noted instances of noncompliance. Noncompliance results in potential unallowable costs charged to grants. Recommendation: We recommend the County establish written procedures for determining the allowability of costs to include a written policy regarding the charging of personnel costs to grants. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement from responsible officials.
2022 ? 003 Allowable Activities and Costs - Payroll Disbursements Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Centers for Disease Control and Prevention U.S. Department of Health & Human Services Federal Program Name: COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF) COVID-19 Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases (ELC) Child Support Enforcement Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 93.323 93.563 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: 1505-0271 - 2021 6NU50CK000539-01-08 DHHS-CDC - 2020 Pass-Through Agency: California Department of Public Health Heluna Health California Department of Child Support Services Pass-Through Number(s): COVID-19ELC29 and COVID-19ELC87 0187.3380 21-06 Award Period: May 26, 2021 - December 31, 2026 May 18, 2020 - November 17, 2022 and January 15, 2021 - July 31, 2023 May 1, 2020 - March 31, 2022 July 1, 2021 - June 30, 2022 Type of Finding: ? Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance ? Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: According to the Assistance Listing Description for CSLFRF and ELC, Subpart D, Post Federal; Award Requirements and Subpart E, Cost Principles apply to the assistance listing. According to the LCSA Fiscal and Administrative Policy Manual Revised 2021, costs allowable for reimbursement under the Child Support IV-D award are governed by federal regulations. Title 2, ?200.403, ?200.404, and Title 45, Part 304 provide general guidelines for determining cost allowability. According to ? 200.302 Financial management of 2 CFR Part 200, the financial management system of each nonfederal entity must provide for written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with subpart E of this part and the terms and conditions of the federal award. According to ? 200.303 Internal controls of 2 CFR Part 200, the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. According to ? 200.403 Factors affecting allowability of costs of 2 CFR Part 200, except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the nonfederal entity in order to be allowable under federal awards. According to ? 200.430 Compensation?personal services of 2 CFR Part 200, costs of compensation are allowable to the extent that they satisfy the specific requirements of this part, and that the total compensation for individual employees: 1. Is reasonable for the services rendered and conforms to the established written policy of the nonfederal entity consistently applied to both federal and nonfederal activities; 2. Follows an appointment made in accordance with a nonfederal entity's laws and/or rules or written policies and meets the requirements of federal statute, where applicable; and 3. Is determined and supported as provided in paragraph (i) of this section, when applicable. According to ? 200.431 Compensation-fringe benefits of 2 CFR Part 200, except as provided elsewhere in these principles, the costs of fringe benefits are allowable provided that the benefits are reasonable and are required by law, nonfederal entity-employee agreement, or an established policy of the nonfederal entity. Condition: The County does not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs nor an established written policy for compensation-personal services and fringe benefits. Questioned costs: Unknown Context: During our testing, we noted the County charged various types of salaries and benefits to the grants. The County does not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs. Specific to compensation-personal services and fringe benefits, there is not an established written policy for us to test that personnel costs charged to grants conform to, follows an appointment in accordance with, and are required by an established policy of the County. Cause: Management oversight. Effect: The auditor noted instances of noncompliance. Noncompliance results in potential unallowable costs charged to grants. Recommendation: We recommend the County establish written procedures for determining the allowability of costs to include a written policy regarding the charging of personnel costs to grants. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement from responsible officials.
2022 ? 003 Allowable Activities and Costs - Payroll Disbursements Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Centers for Disease Control and Prevention U.S. Department of Health & Human Services Federal Program Name: COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF) COVID-19 Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases (ELC) Child Support Enforcement Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 93.323 93.563 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: 1505-0271 - 2021 6NU50CK000539-01-08 DHHS-CDC - 2020 Pass-Through Agency: California Department of Public Health Heluna Health California Department of Child Support Services Pass-Through Number(s): COVID-19ELC29 and COVID-19ELC87 0187.3380 21-06 Award Period: May 26, 2021 - December 31, 2026 May 18, 2020 - November 17, 2022 and January 15, 2021 - July 31, 2023 May 1, 2020 - March 31, 2022 July 1, 2021 - June 30, 2022 Type of Finding: ? Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance ? Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: According to the Assistance Listing Description for CSLFRF and ELC, Subpart D, Post Federal; Award Requirements and Subpart E, Cost Principles apply to the assistance listing. According to the LCSA Fiscal and Administrative Policy Manual Revised 2021, costs allowable for reimbursement under the Child Support IV-D award are governed by federal regulations. Title 2, ?200.403, ?200.404, and Title 45, Part 304 provide general guidelines for determining cost allowability. According to ? 200.302 Financial management of 2 CFR Part 200, the financial management system of each nonfederal entity must provide for written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with subpart E of this part and the terms and conditions of the federal award. According to ? 200.303 Internal controls of 2 CFR Part 200, the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. According to ? 200.403 Factors affecting allowability of costs of 2 CFR Part 200, except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the nonfederal entity in order to be allowable under federal awards. According to ? 200.430 Compensation?personal services of 2 CFR Part 200, costs of compensation are allowable to the extent that they satisfy the specific requirements of this part, and that the total compensation for individual employees: 1. Is reasonable for the services rendered and conforms to the established written policy of the nonfederal entity consistently applied to both federal and nonfederal activities; 2. Follows an appointment made in accordance with a nonfederal entity's laws and/or rules or written policies and meets the requirements of federal statute, where applicable; and 3. Is determined and supported as provided in paragraph (i) of this section, when applicable. According to ? 200.431 Compensation-fringe benefits of 2 CFR Part 200, except as provided elsewhere in these principles, the costs of fringe benefits are allowable provided that the benefits are reasonable and are required by law, nonfederal entity-employee agreement, or an established policy of the nonfederal entity. Condition: The County does not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs nor an established written policy for compensation-personal services and fringe benefits. Questioned costs: Unknown Context: During our testing, we noted the County charged various types of salaries and benefits to the grants. The County does not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs. Specific to compensation-personal services and fringe benefits, there is not an established written policy for us to test that personnel costs charged to grants conform to, follows an appointment in accordance with, and are required by an established policy of the County. Cause: Management oversight. Effect: The auditor noted instances of noncompliance. Noncompliance results in potential unallowable costs charged to grants. Recommendation: We recommend the County establish written procedures for determining the allowability of costs to include a written policy regarding the charging of personnel costs to grants. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement from responsible officials.
2022-001: Procurement Policy and Procedures Condition: Several purchases were made in excess of the micro purchase threshold ($10,000). The Organization could not provide documentation to show they obtained quotes, or the reason quotes were not obtained, or if they gave preference to minority or women-owned businesses. Cause: The Organization has not established a written procurement policy. Criteria: The Code of Federal Regulations requires that entities receiving federal funding have a written procurement policy. The required elements of the procurement policy are detailed out in the Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR) under Title 2, Subtitle A, Part 200, Subpart D, 200.317 thru 200.327. Several other areas require written policies: financial management (200.302), federal payment (200.305), compensation-personal services (200.430), compensation-fringe benefits (200.431), relocation costs of employees (200.464), and travel costs (200.475). Effect: Lack of such policies increases the risk of purchasing items at higher prices than may have been necessary, increases the risk of limiting competition, and increases the risk of waste and abuse. Perspective Information: The need for a procurement policy was brought to the CEO's attention in the fall of 2021. The CEO does believe the spirit of the procurement requirements were met. Recommendations: We recommend quotes are obtained whenever possible when purchases are expected to be between $10,000 and $250,000. If purchases are to equal or exceed $250,000, the proper bidding procedures should be followed. Bidding procedures, quotes, and efforts to give preference to minority or women-owned businesses should be documented, including documenting if bids or quotes could not be obtained or the reasons why bids or quotes were not obtained. We also recommend a procurement policy is established as soon as possible and an individual is assigned to monitor the implementation of the policy. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The Club agrees with this finding. Their intent is to create and implement a procurement policy that complies with the Code of Federal Regulations as soon as possible and add the proper documentation for purchases exceeding the micro purchase threshold beginning with fiscal year 2023. See Corrective Action Plan.
2022-001: Procurement Policy and Procedures Condition: Several purchases were made in excess of the micro purchase threshold ($10,000). The Organization could not provide documentation to show they obtained quotes, or the reason quotes were not obtained, or if they gave preference to minority or women-owned businesses. Cause: The Organization has not established a written procurement policy. Criteria: The Code of Federal Regulations requires that entities receiving federal funding have a written procurement policy. The required elements of the procurement policy are detailed out in the Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR) under Title 2, Subtitle A, Part 200, Subpart D, 200.317 thru 200.327. Several other areas require written policies: financial management (200.302), federal payment (200.305), compensation-personal services (200.430), compensation-fringe benefits (200.431), relocation costs of employees (200.464), and travel costs (200.475). Effect: Lack of such policies increases the risk of purchasing items at higher prices than may have been necessary, increases the risk of limiting competition, and increases the risk of waste and abuse. Perspective Information: The need for a procurement policy was brought to the CEO's attention in the fall of 2021. The CEO does believe the spirit of the procurement requirements were met. Recommendations: We recommend quotes are obtained whenever possible when purchases are expected to be between $10,000 and $250,000. If purchases are to equal or exceed $250,000, the proper bidding procedures should be followed. Bidding procedures, quotes, and efforts to give preference to minority or women-owned businesses should be documented, including documenting if bids or quotes could not be obtained or the reasons why bids or quotes were not obtained. We also recommend a procurement policy is established as soon as possible and an individual is assigned to monitor the implementation of the policy. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The Club agrees with this finding. Their intent is to create and implement a procurement policy that complies with the Code of Federal Regulations as soon as possible and add the proper documentation for purchases exceeding the micro purchase threshold beginning with fiscal year 2023. See Corrective Action Plan.
2022-001: Procurement Policy and Procedures Condition: Several purchases were made in excess of the micro purchase threshold ($10,000). The Organization could not provide documentation to show they obtained quotes, or the reason quotes were not obtained, or if they gave preference to minority or women-owned businesses. Cause: The Organization has not established a written procurement policy. Criteria: The Code of Federal Regulations requires that entities receiving federal funding have a written procurement policy. The required elements of the procurement policy are detailed out in the Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR) under Title 2, Subtitle A, Part 200, Subpart D, 200.317 thru 200.327. Several other areas require written policies: financial management (200.302), federal payment (200.305), compensation-personal services (200.430), compensation-fringe benefits (200.431), relocation costs of employees (200.464), and travel costs (200.475). Effect: Lack of such policies increases the risk of purchasing items at higher prices than may have been necessary, increases the risk of limiting competition, and increases the risk of waste and abuse. Perspective Information: The need for a procurement policy was brought to the CEO's attention in the fall of 2021. The CEO does believe the spirit of the procurement requirements were met. Recommendations: We recommend quotes are obtained whenever possible when purchases are expected to be between $10,000 and $250,000. If purchases are to equal or exceed $250,000, the proper bidding procedures should be followed. Bidding procedures, quotes, and efforts to give preference to minority or women-owned businesses should be documented, including documenting if bids or quotes could not be obtained or the reasons why bids or quotes were not obtained. We also recommend a procurement policy is established as soon as possible and an individual is assigned to monitor the implementation of the policy. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The Club agrees with this finding. Their intent is to create and implement a procurement policy that complies with the Code of Federal Regulations as soon as possible and add the proper documentation for purchases exceeding the micro purchase threshold beginning with fiscal year 2023. See Corrective Action Plan.
Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 establish that the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. 2 CFR 200.430 establishes that the cost of compensation for personnel services is allowable to the extent that it follows an appointment made in accordance with the governmental unit's laws and rules and meets the merit system or other requirements required by federal law, where applicable. Compensation for personal services may also include fringe benefits which are addressed in §200.431 Compensation—fringe benefits. Costs of compensation are allowable to the extent that they satisfy the specific requirements of this part, and that the total compensation for individual employees: (1) Is reasonable for the services rendered and conforms to the established written policy of the non-Federal entity consistently applied to both Federal and non-Federal activities; (2) Follows an appointment made in accordance with a non-Federal entity's laws and/or rules or written policies and meets the requirements of Federal statute, where applicable; and (3) Is determined and supported as provided in paragraph (i) of this section, Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses, when applicable. (i) The Non-Federal entity establishes consistent written policies which apply uniformly to all faculty members, not just those working on Federal awards. Condition a. During our audit, on a sample of sixty (60) personnel files, we observed that the personnel files are not being kept current and in some instances were incomplete. b. One personnel file of federal funds was not provided for our evaluation. c. The PRDH does not have established written policies and manuals which can define standard internal controls for each program and / or region of the entity. Cause PRDH has not established an effective internal control designed to ensure the accuracy and completeness of the employee files. Also, the incompleteness of the files may depend of the time that the employee started working in the agency. Effect Due to law and regulation changes, incomplete files may result in inadequate documentation to support compliance with the criteria over management and administration of personnel files. Also, in the case of employees paid with federal funds, it may result in cost disallowances for personnel that do not meet the requirements to be employed by the corresponding federal program. Questioned Costs None Perspective Information Finding does not represent a significant problem. The Department has addressed this finding and it’s been taking the steps necessary to reduce incidences to a minimum. We selected 60 employee files from all agency. Prior Year Audit Finding 2021-002 Recommendation PRDH should immediately undertake a process to review all personnel files and validate that the minimum requirement documents are appropriately completed and included in each personnel file. Also, the PRDH must update the salary change form in file in order to reflect current salary as stated in the digital information system. Views of Responsible Officials During the month of August, the Office of Human Resources and Labor Relations was audited by the ADA. It is to this that we respond to the findings indicated in the audit, as follows: Over the past few years we have developed an internal control, using a document entitled Check sheet, which contains the list of documents required for the appointment of employees and another for the audit of files. It contains three columns for the collation of documents required by the Analysts of the Appointments and Changes Section and ends with the collation of the Division Supervisor, before being referred to the Personnel Officers of our regions. This document has been modified according to needs, changes, procedures and new regulations. It is important to mention that many of our audited personnel records pertain to employees appointed in years where the required requirements or documents were minimal, and no evidence was required or maintained in the personnel file. Related to the academic preparation contained in the personnel files, they are documents required by the Recruitment and Selection Section and these respond to the minimum requirements and alternatives of the class, according to the Agency's Classification Plan. Each class specification sets minimum requirements for the position the candidate will hold. On the other hand, when the previously known Administration of Health Services Facilities (AFASS) closed in 1999, its employees went to the Department of Health with the file they had, whose procedures and processes were not uniform to those of our Agency. The Regions and Hospitals have delegated the verification of documents, to work on appointments and other personnel transactions, such as job reclassifications, promotions and others. This delegation brings the process of standardizing and authorizing DSP-29 by the Recruitment and Selection Section, to ensure that it is complied with as established in the Classification Plan. The agency is in the process of updating these documents as long as a change in the employee's job classification is applied. These are transactions that allow us to update the employees’ record to the new class they will occupy. In the case of Doping Test results, we mention that these are found in the Medical Record of each employee. By HIPPA law, these are not filed in the personnel file. Of the aspects pointed out in the audit, the Department of Health has developed greater review and audit measures by the analysts of our agency, before the defunct Quality Control Section, who watched over and audited the personnel files of the Regions, providing control and compliance with the documents required according to the Regulations and Standards that govern the Office of Human Resources and Labor Relations. The Office of Human Resources presented a work plan to implement an effective and efficient personnel file review procedure to comply with and improve the agency's personnel processes and transactions. Responsible Officials Lcdo. Luis Rivera Villanueva Sec. Auxiliar de Recursos Humanos 787-765-2929 ext. 4273 Mrs. Luz S. Ramos Pedroza Specialist 787-765-2929 ext. 4273 Mrs. Maribel Zayas Payroll Officer Director 787-765-2929 ext. 4209 Estimated Completion Date Implementation is expected to be completed on or before the end of the fiscal year June 30, 2024.
Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 establish that the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. 2 CFR 200.430 establishes that the cost of compensation for personnel services is allowable to the extent that it follows an appointment made in accordance with the governmental unit's laws and rules and meets the merit system or other requirements required by federal law, where applicable. Compensation for personal services may also include fringe benefits which are addressed in §200.431 Compensation—fringe benefits. Costs of compensation are allowable to the extent that they satisfy the specific requirements of this part, and that the total compensation for individual employees: (1) Is reasonable for the services rendered and conforms to the established written policy of the non-Federal entity consistently applied to both Federal and non-Federal activities; (2) Follows an appointment made in accordance with a non-Federal entity's laws and/or rules or written policies and meets the requirements of Federal statute, where applicable; and (3) Is determined and supported as provided in paragraph (i) of this section, Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses, when applicable. (i) The Non-Federal entity establishes consistent written policies which apply uniformly to all faculty members, not just those working on Federal awards. Condition a. During our audit, on a sample of sixty (60) personnel files, we observed that the personnel files are not being kept current and in some instances were incomplete. b. One personnel file of federal funds was not provided for our evaluation. c. The PRDH does not have established written policies and manuals which can define standard internal controls for each program and / or region of the entity. Cause PRDH has not established an effective internal control designed to ensure the accuracy and completeness of the employee files. Also, the incompleteness of the files may depend of the time that the employee started working in the agency. Effect Due to law and regulation changes, incomplete files may result in inadequate documentation to support compliance with the criteria over management and administration of personnel files. Also, in the case of employees paid with federal funds, it may result in cost disallowances for personnel that do not meet the requirements to be employed by the corresponding federal program. Questioned Costs None Perspective Information Finding does not represent a significant problem. The Department has addressed this finding and it’s been taking the steps necessary to reduce incidences to a minimum. We selected 60 employee files from all agency. Prior Year Audit Finding 2021-002 Recommendation PRDH should immediately undertake a process to review all personnel files and validate that the minimum requirement documents are appropriately completed and included in each personnel file. Also, the PRDH must update the salary change form in file in order to reflect current salary as stated in the digital information system. Views of Responsible Officials During the month of August, the Office of Human Resources and Labor Relations was audited by the ADA. It is to this that we respond to the findings indicated in the audit, as follows: Over the past few years we have developed an internal control, using a document entitled Check sheet, which contains the list of documents required for the appointment of employees and another for the audit of files. It contains three columns for the collation of documents required by the Analysts of the Appointments and Changes Section and ends with the collation of the Division Supervisor, before being referred to the Personnel Officers of our regions. This document has been modified according to needs, changes, procedures and new regulations. It is important to mention that many of our audited personnel records pertain to employees appointed in years where the required requirements or documents were minimal, and no evidence was required or maintained in the personnel file. Related to the academic preparation contained in the personnel files, they are documents required by the Recruitment and Selection Section and these respond to the minimum requirements and alternatives of the class, according to the Agency's Classification Plan. Each class specification sets minimum requirements for the position the candidate will hold. On the other hand, when the previously known Administration of Health Services Facilities (AFASS) closed in 1999, its employees went to the Department of Health with the file they had, whose procedures and processes were not uniform to those of our Agency. The Regions and Hospitals have delegated the verification of documents, to work on appointments and other personnel transactions, such as job reclassifications, promotions and others. This delegation brings the process of standardizing and authorizing DSP-29 by the Recruitment and Selection Section, to ensure that it is complied with as established in the Classification Plan. The agency is in the process of updating these documents as long as a change in the employee's job classification is applied. These are transactions that allow us to update the employees’ record to the new class they will occupy. In the case of Doping Test results, we mention that these are found in the Medical Record of each employee. By HIPPA law, these are not filed in the personnel file. Of the aspects pointed out in the audit, the Department of Health has developed greater review and audit measures by the analysts of our agency, before the defunct Quality Control Section, who watched over and audited the personnel files of the Regions, providing control and compliance with the documents required according to the Regulations and Standards that govern the Office of Human Resources and Labor Relations. The Office of Human Resources presented a work plan to implement an effective and efficient personnel file review procedure to comply with and improve the agency's personnel processes and transactions. Responsible Officials Lcdo. Luis Rivera Villanueva Sec. Auxiliar de Recursos Humanos 787-765-2929 ext. 4273 Mrs. Luz S. Ramos Pedroza Specialist 787-765-2929 ext. 4273 Mrs. Maribel Zayas Payroll Officer Director 787-765-2929 ext. 4209 Estimated Completion Date Implementation is expected to be completed on or before the end of the fiscal year June 30, 2024.
Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 establish that the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. 2 CFR 200.430 establishes that the cost of compensation for personnel services is allowable to the extent that it follows an appointment made in accordance with the governmental unit's laws and rules and meets the merit system or other requirements required by federal law, where applicable. Compensation for personal services may also include fringe benefits which are addressed in §200.431 Compensation—fringe benefits. Costs of compensation are allowable to the extent that they satisfy the specific requirements of this part, and that the total compensation for individual employees: (1) Is reasonable for the services rendered and conforms to the established written policy of the non-Federal entity consistently applied to both Federal and non-Federal activities; (2) Follows an appointment made in accordance with a non-Federal entity's laws and/or rules or written policies and meets the requirements of Federal statute, where applicable; and (3) Is determined and supported as provided in paragraph (i) of this section, Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses, when applicable. (i) The Non-Federal entity establishes consistent written policies which apply uniformly to all faculty members, not just those working on Federal awards. Condition a. During our audit, on a sample of sixty (60) personnel files, we observed that the personnel files are not being kept current and in some instances were incomplete. b. One personnel file of federal funds was not provided for our evaluation. c. The PRDH does not have established written policies and manuals which can define standard internal controls for each program and / or region of the entity. Cause PRDH has not established an effective internal control designed to ensure the accuracy and completeness of the employee files. Also, the incompleteness of the files may depend of the time that the employee started working in the agency. Effect Due to law and regulation changes, incomplete files may result in inadequate documentation to support compliance with the criteria over management and administration of personnel files. Also, in the case of employees paid with federal funds, it may result in cost disallowances for personnel that do not meet the requirements to be employed by the corresponding federal program. Questioned Costs None Perspective Information Finding does not represent a significant problem. The Department has addressed this finding and it’s been taking the steps necessary to reduce incidences to a minimum. We selected 60 employee files from all agency. Prior Year Audit Finding 2021-002 Recommendation PRDH should immediately undertake a process to review all personnel files and validate that the minimum requirement documents are appropriately completed and included in each personnel file. Also, the PRDH must update the salary change form in file in order to reflect current salary as stated in the digital information system. Views of Responsible Officials During the month of August, the Office of Human Resources and Labor Relations was audited by the ADA. It is to this that we respond to the findings indicated in the audit, as follows: Over the past few years we have developed an internal control, using a document entitled Check sheet, which contains the list of documents required for the appointment of employees and another for the audit of files. It contains three columns for the collation of documents required by the Analysts of the Appointments and Changes Section and ends with the collation of the Division Supervisor, before being referred to the Personnel Officers of our regions. This document has been modified according to needs, changes, procedures and new regulations. It is important to mention that many of our audited personnel records pertain to employees appointed in years where the required requirements or documents were minimal, and no evidence was required or maintained in the personnel file. Related to the academic preparation contained in the personnel files, they are documents required by the Recruitment and Selection Section and these respond to the minimum requirements and alternatives of the class, according to the Agency's Classification Plan. Each class specification sets minimum requirements for the position the candidate will hold. On the other hand, when the previously known Administration of Health Services Facilities (AFASS) closed in 1999, its employees went to the Department of Health with the file they had, whose procedures and processes were not uniform to those of our Agency. The Regions and Hospitals have delegated the verification of documents, to work on appointments and other personnel transactions, such as job reclassifications, promotions and others. This delegation brings the process of standardizing and authorizing DSP-29 by the Recruitment and Selection Section, to ensure that it is complied with as established in the Classification Plan. The agency is in the process of updating these documents as long as a change in the employee's job classification is applied. These are transactions that allow us to update the employees’ record to the new class they will occupy. In the case of Doping Test results, we mention that these are found in the Medical Record of each employee. By HIPPA law, these are not filed in the personnel file. Of the aspects pointed out in the audit, the Department of Health has developed greater review and audit measures by the analysts of our agency, before the defunct Quality Control Section, who watched over and audited the personnel files of the Regions, providing control and compliance with the documents required according to the Regulations and Standards that govern the Office of Human Resources and Labor Relations. The Office of Human Resources presented a work plan to implement an effective and efficient personnel file review procedure to comply with and improve the agency's personnel processes and transactions. Responsible Officials Lcdo. Luis Rivera Villanueva Sec. Auxiliar de Recursos Humanos 787-765-2929 ext. 4273 Mrs. Luz S. Ramos Pedroza Specialist 787-765-2929 ext. 4273 Mrs. Maribel Zayas Payroll Officer Director 787-765-2929 ext. 4209 Estimated Completion Date Implementation is expected to be completed on or before the end of the fiscal year June 30, 2024.
Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 establish that the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. 2 CFR 200.430 establishes that the cost of compensation for personnel services is allowable to the extent that it follows an appointment made in accordance with the governmental unit's laws and rules and meets the merit system or other requirements required by federal law, where applicable. Compensation for personal services may also include fringe benefits which are addressed in §200.431 Compensation—fringe benefits. Costs of compensation are allowable to the extent that they satisfy the specific requirements of this part, and that the total compensation for individual employees: (1) Is reasonable for the services rendered and conforms to the established written policy of the non-Federal entity consistently applied to both Federal and non-Federal activities; (2) Follows an appointment made in accordance with a non-Federal entity's laws and/or rules or written policies and meets the requirements of Federal statute, where applicable; and (3) Is determined and supported as provided in paragraph (i) of this section, Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses, when applicable. (i) The Non-Federal entity establishes consistent written policies which apply uniformly to all faculty members, not just those working on Federal awards. Condition a. During our audit, on a sample of sixty (60) personnel files, we observed that the personnel files are not being kept current and in some instances were incomplete. b. One personnel file of federal funds was not provided for our evaluation. c. The PRDH does not have established written policies and manuals which can define standard internal controls for each program and / or region of the entity. Cause PRDH has not established an effective internal control designed to ensure the accuracy and completeness of the employee files. Also, the incompleteness of the files may depend of the time that the employee started working in the agency. Effect Due to law and regulation changes, incomplete files may result in inadequate documentation to support compliance with the criteria over management and administration of personnel files. Also, in the case of employees paid with federal funds, it may result in cost disallowances for personnel that do not meet the requirements to be employed by the corresponding federal program. Questioned Costs None Perspective Information Finding does not represent a significant problem. The Department has addressed this finding and it’s been taking the steps necessary to reduce incidences to a minimum. We selected 60 employee files from all agency. Prior Year Audit Finding 2021-002 Recommendation PRDH should immediately undertake a process to review all personnel files and validate that the minimum requirement documents are appropriately completed and included in each personnel file. Also, the PRDH must update the salary change form in file in order to reflect current salary as stated in the digital information system. Views of Responsible Officials During the month of August, the Office of Human Resources and Labor Relations was audited by the ADA. It is to this that we respond to the findings indicated in the audit, as follows: Over the past few years we have developed an internal control, using a document entitled Check sheet, which contains the list of documents required for the appointment of employees and another for the audit of files. It contains three columns for the collation of documents required by the Analysts of the Appointments and Changes Section and ends with the collation of the Division Supervisor, before being referred to the Personnel Officers of our regions. This document has been modified according to needs, changes, procedures and new regulations. It is important to mention that many of our audited personnel records pertain to employees appointed in years where the required requirements or documents were minimal, and no evidence was required or maintained in the personnel file. Related to the academic preparation contained in the personnel files, they are documents required by the Recruitment and Selection Section and these respond to the minimum requirements and alternatives of the class, according to the Agency's Classification Plan. Each class specification sets minimum requirements for the position the candidate will hold. On the other hand, when the previously known Administration of Health Services Facilities (AFASS) closed in 1999, its employees went to the Department of Health with the file they had, whose procedures and processes were not uniform to those of our Agency. The Regions and Hospitals have delegated the verification of documents, to work on appointments and other personnel transactions, such as job reclassifications, promotions and others. This delegation brings the process of standardizing and authorizing DSP-29 by the Recruitment and Selection Section, to ensure that it is complied with as established in the Classification Plan. The agency is in the process of updating these documents as long as a change in the employee's job classification is applied. These are transactions that allow us to update the employees’ record to the new class they will occupy. In the case of Doping Test results, we mention that these are found in the Medical Record of each employee. By HIPPA law, these are not filed in the personnel file. Of the aspects pointed out in the audit, the Department of Health has developed greater review and audit measures by the analysts of our agency, before the defunct Quality Control Section, who watched over and audited the personnel files of the Regions, providing control and compliance with the documents required according to the Regulations and Standards that govern the Office of Human Resources and Labor Relations. The Office of Human Resources presented a work plan to implement an effective and efficient personnel file review procedure to comply with and improve the agency's personnel processes and transactions. Responsible Officials Lcdo. Luis Rivera Villanueva Sec. Auxiliar de Recursos Humanos 787-765-2929 ext. 4273 Mrs. Luz S. Ramos Pedroza Specialist 787-765-2929 ext. 4273 Mrs. Maribel Zayas Payroll Officer Director 787-765-2929 ext. 4209 Estimated Completion Date Implementation is expected to be completed on or before the end of the fiscal year June 30, 2024.
Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 establish that the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. 2 CFR 200.430 establishes that the cost of compensation for personnel services is allowable to the extent that it follows an appointment made in accordance with the governmental unit's laws and rules and meets the merit system or other requirements required by federal law, where applicable. Compensation for personal services may also include fringe benefits which are addressed in §200.431 Compensation—fringe benefits. Costs of compensation are allowable to the extent that they satisfy the specific requirements of this part, and that the total compensation for individual employees: (1) Is reasonable for the services rendered and conforms to the established written policy of the non-Federal entity consistently applied to both Federal and non-Federal activities; (2) Follows an appointment made in accordance with a non-Federal entity's laws and/or rules or written policies and meets the requirements of Federal statute, where applicable; and (3) Is determined and supported as provided in paragraph (i) of this section, Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses, when applicable. (i) The Non-Federal entity establishes consistent written policies which apply uniformly to all faculty members, not just those working on Federal awards. Condition a. During our audit, on a sample of sixty (60) personnel files, we observed that the personnel files are not being kept current and in some instances were incomplete. b. One personnel file of federal funds was not provided for our evaluation. c. The PRDH does not have established written policies and manuals which can define standard internal controls for each program and / or region of the entity. Cause PRDH has not established an effective internal control designed to ensure the accuracy and completeness of the employee files. Also, the incompleteness of the files may depend of the time that the employee started working in the agency. Effect Due to law and regulation changes, incomplete files may result in inadequate documentation to support compliance with the criteria over management and administration of personnel files. Also, in the case of employees paid with federal funds, it may result in cost disallowances for personnel that do not meet the requirements to be employed by the corresponding federal program. Questioned Costs None Perspective Information Finding does not represent a significant problem. The Department has addressed this finding and it’s been taking the steps necessary to reduce incidences to a minimum. We selected 60 employee files from all agency. Prior Year Audit Finding 2021-002 Recommendation PRDH should immediately undertake a process to review all personnel files and validate that the minimum requirement documents are appropriately completed and included in each personnel file. Also, the PRDH must update the salary change form in file in order to reflect current salary as stated in the digital information system. Views of Responsible Officials During the month of August, the Office of Human Resources and Labor Relations was audited by the ADA. It is to this that we respond to the findings indicated in the audit, as follows: Over the past few years we have developed an internal control, using a document entitled Check sheet, which contains the list of documents required for the appointment of employees and another for the audit of files. It contains three columns for the collation of documents required by the Analysts of the Appointments and Changes Section and ends with the collation of the Division Supervisor, before being referred to the Personnel Officers of our regions. This document has been modified according to needs, changes, procedures and new regulations. It is important to mention that many of our audited personnel records pertain to employees appointed in years where the required requirements or documents were minimal, and no evidence was required or maintained in the personnel file. Related to the academic preparation contained in the personnel files, they are documents required by the Recruitment and Selection Section and these respond to the minimum requirements and alternatives of the class, according to the Agency's Classification Plan. Each class specification sets minimum requirements for the position the candidate will hold. On the other hand, when the previously known Administration of Health Services Facilities (AFASS) closed in 1999, its employees went to the Department of Health with the file they had, whose procedures and processes were not uniform to those of our Agency. The Regions and Hospitals have delegated the verification of documents, to work on appointments and other personnel transactions, such as job reclassifications, promotions and others. This delegation brings the process of standardizing and authorizing DSP-29 by the Recruitment and Selection Section, to ensure that it is complied with as established in the Classification Plan. The agency is in the process of updating these documents as long as a change in the employee's job classification is applied. These are transactions that allow us to update the employees’ record to the new class they will occupy. In the case of Doping Test results, we mention that these are found in the Medical Record of each employee. By HIPPA law, these are not filed in the personnel file. Of the aspects pointed out in the audit, the Department of Health has developed greater review and audit measures by the analysts of our agency, before the defunct Quality Control Section, who watched over and audited the personnel files of the Regions, providing control and compliance with the documents required according to the Regulations and Standards that govern the Office of Human Resources and Labor Relations. The Office of Human Resources presented a work plan to implement an effective and efficient personnel file review procedure to comply with and improve the agency's personnel processes and transactions. Responsible Officials Lcdo. Luis Rivera Villanueva Sec. Auxiliar de Recursos Humanos 787-765-2929 ext. 4273 Mrs. Luz S. Ramos Pedroza Specialist 787-765-2929 ext. 4273 Mrs. Maribel Zayas Payroll Officer Director 787-765-2929 ext. 4209 Estimated Completion Date Implementation is expected to be completed on or before the end of the fiscal year June 30, 2024.
Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 establish that the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. 2 CFR 200.430 establishes that the cost of compensation for personnel services is allowable to the extent that it follows an appointment made in accordance with the governmental unit's laws and rules and meets the merit system or other requirements required by federal law, where applicable. Compensation for personal services may also include fringe benefits which are addressed in §200.431 Compensation—fringe benefits. Costs of compensation are allowable to the extent that they satisfy the specific requirements of this part, and that the total compensation for individual employees: (1) Is reasonable for the services rendered and conforms to the established written policy of the non-Federal entity consistently applied to both Federal and non-Federal activities; (2) Follows an appointment made in accordance with a non-Federal entity's laws and/or rules or written policies and meets the requirements of Federal statute, where applicable; and (3) Is determined and supported as provided in paragraph (i) of this section, Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses, when applicable. (i) The Non-Federal entity establishes consistent written policies which apply uniformly to all faculty members, not just those working on Federal awards. Condition a. During our audit, on a sample of sixty (60) personnel files, we observed that the personnel files are not being kept current and in some instances were incomplete. b. One personnel file of federal funds was not provided for our evaluation. c. The PRDH does not have established written policies and manuals which can define standard internal controls for each program and / or region of the entity. Cause PRDH has not established an effective internal control designed to ensure the accuracy and completeness of the employee files. Also, the incompleteness of the files may depend of the time that the employee started working in the agency. Effect Due to law and regulation changes, incomplete files may result in inadequate documentation to support compliance with the criteria over management and administration of personnel files. Also, in the case of employees paid with federal funds, it may result in cost disallowances for personnel that do not meet the requirements to be employed by the corresponding federal program. Questioned Costs None Perspective Information Finding does not represent a significant problem. The Department has addressed this finding and it’s been taking the steps necessary to reduce incidences to a minimum. We selected 60 employee files from all agency. Prior Year Audit Finding 2021-002 Recommendation PRDH should immediately undertake a process to review all personnel files and validate that the minimum requirement documents are appropriately completed and included in each personnel file. Also, the PRDH must update the salary change form in file in order to reflect current salary as stated in the digital information system. Views of Responsible Officials During the month of August, the Office of Human Resources and Labor Relations was audited by the ADA. It is to this that we respond to the findings indicated in the audit, as follows: Over the past few years we have developed an internal control, using a document entitled Check sheet, which contains the list of documents required for the appointment of employees and another for the audit of files. It contains three columns for the collation of documents required by the Analysts of the Appointments and Changes Section and ends with the collation of the Division Supervisor, before being referred to the Personnel Officers of our regions. This document has been modified according to needs, changes, procedures and new regulations. It is important to mention that many of our audited personnel records pertain to employees appointed in years where the required requirements or documents were minimal, and no evidence was required or maintained in the personnel file. Related to the academic preparation contained in the personnel files, they are documents required by the Recruitment and Selection Section and these respond to the minimum requirements and alternatives of the class, according to the Agency's Classification Plan. Each class specification sets minimum requirements for the position the candidate will hold. On the other hand, when the previously known Administration of Health Services Facilities (AFASS) closed in 1999, its employees went to the Department of Health with the file they had, whose procedures and processes were not uniform to those of our Agency. The Regions and Hospitals have delegated the verification of documents, to work on appointments and other personnel transactions, such as job reclassifications, promotions and others. This delegation brings the process of standardizing and authorizing DSP-29 by the Recruitment and Selection Section, to ensure that it is complied with as established in the Classification Plan. The agency is in the process of updating these documents as long as a change in the employee's job classification is applied. These are transactions that allow us to update the employees’ record to the new class they will occupy. In the case of Doping Test results, we mention that these are found in the Medical Record of each employee. By HIPPA law, these are not filed in the personnel file. Of the aspects pointed out in the audit, the Department of Health has developed greater review and audit measures by the analysts of our agency, before the defunct Quality Control Section, who watched over and audited the personnel files of the Regions, providing control and compliance with the documents required according to the Regulations and Standards that govern the Office of Human Resources and Labor Relations. The Office of Human Resources presented a work plan to implement an effective and efficient personnel file review procedure to comply with and improve the agency's personnel processes and transactions. Responsible Officials Lcdo. Luis Rivera Villanueva Sec. Auxiliar de Recursos Humanos 787-765-2929 ext. 4273 Mrs. Luz S. Ramos Pedroza Specialist 787-765-2929 ext. 4273 Mrs. Maribel Zayas Payroll Officer Director 787-765-2929 ext. 4209 Estimated Completion Date Implementation is expected to be completed on or before the end of the fiscal year June 30, 2024.
Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 establish that the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. 2 CFR 200.430 establishes that the cost of compensation for personnel services is allowable to the extent that it follows an appointment made in accordance with the governmental unit's laws and rules and meets the merit system or other requirements required by federal law, where applicable. Compensation for personal services may also include fringe benefits which are addressed in §200.431 Compensation—fringe benefits. Costs of compensation are allowable to the extent that they satisfy the specific requirements of this part, and that the total compensation for individual employees: (1) Is reasonable for the services rendered and conforms to the established written policy of the non-Federal entity consistently applied to both Federal and non-Federal activities; (2) Follows an appointment made in accordance with a non-Federal entity's laws and/or rules or written policies and meets the requirements of Federal statute, where applicable; and (3) Is determined and supported as provided in paragraph (i) of this section, Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses, when applicable. (i) The Non-Federal entity establishes consistent written policies which apply uniformly to all faculty members, not just those working on Federal awards. Condition a. During our audit, on a sample of sixty (60) personnel files, we observed that the personnel files are not being kept current and in some instances were incomplete. b. One personnel file of federal funds was not provided for our evaluation. c. The PRDH does not have established written policies and manuals which can define standard internal controls for each program and / or region of the entity. Cause PRDH has not established an effective internal control designed to ensure the accuracy and completeness of the employee files. Also, the incompleteness of the files may depend of the time that the employee started working in the agency. Effect Due to law and regulation changes, incomplete files may result in inadequate documentation to support compliance with the criteria over management and administration of personnel files. Also, in the case of employees paid with federal funds, it may result in cost disallowances for personnel that do not meet the requirements to be employed by the corresponding federal program. Questioned Costs None Perspective Information Finding does not represent a significant problem. The Department has addressed this finding and it’s been taking the steps necessary to reduce incidences to a minimum. We selected 60 employee files from all agency. Prior Year Audit Finding 2021-002 Recommendation PRDH should immediately undertake a process to review all personnel files and validate that the minimum requirement documents are appropriately completed and included in each personnel file. Also, the PRDH must update the salary change form in file in order to reflect current salary as stated in the digital information system. Views of Responsible Officials During the month of August, the Office of Human Resources and Labor Relations was audited by the ADA. It is to this that we respond to the findings indicated in the audit, as follows: Over the past few years we have developed an internal control, using a document entitled Check sheet, which contains the list of documents required for the appointment of employees and another for the audit of files. It contains three columns for the collation of documents required by the Analysts of the Appointments and Changes Section and ends with the collation of the Division Supervisor, before being referred to the Personnel Officers of our regions. This document has been modified according to needs, changes, procedures and new regulations. It is important to mention that many of our audited personnel records pertain to employees appointed in years where the required requirements or documents were minimal, and no evidence was required or maintained in the personnel file. Related to the academic preparation contained in the personnel files, they are documents required by the Recruitment and Selection Section and these respond to the minimum requirements and alternatives of the class, according to the Agency's Classification Plan. Each class specification sets minimum requirements for the position the candidate will hold. On the other hand, when the previously known Administration of Health Services Facilities (AFASS) closed in 1999, its employees went to the Department of Health with the file they had, whose procedures and processes were not uniform to those of our Agency. The Regions and Hospitals have delegated the verification of documents, to work on appointments and other personnel transactions, such as job reclassifications, promotions and others. This delegation brings the process of standardizing and authorizing DSP-29 by the Recruitment and Selection Section, to ensure that it is complied with as established in the Classification Plan. The agency is in the process of updating these documents as long as a change in the employee's job classification is applied. These are transactions that allow us to update the employees’ record to the new class they will occupy. In the case of Doping Test results, we mention that these are found in the Medical Record of each employee. By HIPPA law, these are not filed in the personnel file. Of the aspects pointed out in the audit, the Department of Health has developed greater review and audit measures by the analysts of our agency, before the defunct Quality Control Section, who watched over and audited the personnel files of the Regions, providing control and compliance with the documents required according to the Regulations and Standards that govern the Office of Human Resources and Labor Relations. The Office of Human Resources presented a work plan to implement an effective and efficient personnel file review procedure to comply with and improve the agency's personnel processes and transactions. Responsible Officials Lcdo. Luis Rivera Villanueva Sec. Auxiliar de Recursos Humanos 787-765-2929 ext. 4273 Mrs. Luz S. Ramos Pedroza Specialist 787-765-2929 ext. 4273 Mrs. Maribel Zayas Payroll Officer Director 787-765-2929 ext. 4209 Estimated Completion Date Implementation is expected to be completed on or before the end of the fiscal year June 30, 2024.
Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 establish that the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. 2 CFR 200.430 establishes that the cost of compensation for personnel services is allowable to the extent that it follows an appointment made in accordance with the governmental unit's laws and rules and meets the merit system or other requirements required by federal law, where applicable. Compensation for personal services may also include fringe benefits which are addressed in §200.431 Compensation—fringe benefits. Costs of compensation are allowable to the extent that they satisfy the specific requirements of this part, and that the total compensation for individual employees: (1) Is reasonable for the services rendered and conforms to the established written policy of the non-Federal entity consistently applied to both Federal and non-Federal activities; (2) Follows an appointment made in accordance with a non-Federal entity's laws and/or rules or written policies and meets the requirements of Federal statute, where applicable; and (3) Is determined and supported as provided in paragraph (i) of this section, Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses, when applicable. (i) The Non-Federal entity establishes consistent written policies which apply uniformly to all faculty members, not just those working on Federal awards. Condition a. During our audit, on a sample of sixty (60) personnel files, we observed that the personnel files are not being kept current and in some instances were incomplete. b. One personnel file of federal funds was not provided for our evaluation. c. The PRDH does not have established written policies and manuals which can define standard internal controls for each program and / or region of the entity. Cause PRDH has not established an effective internal control designed to ensure the accuracy and completeness of the employee files. Also, the incompleteness of the files may depend of the time that the employee started working in the agency. Effect Due to law and regulation changes, incomplete files may result in inadequate documentation to support compliance with the criteria over management and administration of personnel files. Also, in the case of employees paid with federal funds, it may result in cost disallowances for personnel that do not meet the requirements to be employed by the corresponding federal program. Questioned Costs None Perspective Information Finding does not represent a significant problem. The Department has addressed this finding and it’s been taking the steps necessary to reduce incidences to a minimum. We selected 60 employee files from all agency. Prior Year Audit Finding 2021-002 Recommendation PRDH should immediately undertake a process to review all personnel files and validate that the minimum requirement documents are appropriately completed and included in each personnel file. Also, the PRDH must update the salary change form in file in order to reflect current salary as stated in the digital information system. Views of Responsible Officials During the month of August, the Office of Human Resources and Labor Relations was audited by the ADA. It is to this that we respond to the findings indicated in the audit, as follows: Over the past few years we have developed an internal control, using a document entitled Check sheet, which contains the list of documents required for the appointment of employees and another for the audit of files. It contains three columns for the collation of documents required by the Analysts of the Appointments and Changes Section and ends with the collation of the Division Supervisor, before being referred to the Personnel Officers of our regions. This document has been modified according to needs, changes, procedures and new regulations. It is important to mention that many of our audited personnel records pertain to employees appointed in years where the required requirements or documents were minimal, and no evidence was required or maintained in the personnel file. Related to the academic preparation contained in the personnel files, they are documents required by the Recruitment and Selection Section and these respond to the minimum requirements and alternatives of the class, according to the Agency's Classification Plan. Each class specification sets minimum requirements for the position the candidate will hold. On the other hand, when the previously known Administration of Health Services Facilities (AFASS) closed in 1999, its employees went to the Department of Health with the file they had, whose procedures and processes were not uniform to those of our Agency. The Regions and Hospitals have delegated the verification of documents, to work on appointments and other personnel transactions, such as job reclassifications, promotions and others. This delegation brings the process of standardizing and authorizing DSP-29 by the Recruitment and Selection Section, to ensure that it is complied with as established in the Classification Plan. The agency is in the process of updating these documents as long as a change in the employee's job classification is applied. These are transactions that allow us to update the employees’ record to the new class they will occupy. In the case of Doping Test results, we mention that these are found in the Medical Record of each employee. By HIPPA law, these are not filed in the personnel file. Of the aspects pointed out in the audit, the Department of Health has developed greater review and audit measures by the analysts of our agency, before the defunct Quality Control Section, who watched over and audited the personnel files of the Regions, providing control and compliance with the documents required according to the Regulations and Standards that govern the Office of Human Resources and Labor Relations. The Office of Human Resources presented a work plan to implement an effective and efficient personnel file review procedure to comply with and improve the agency's personnel processes and transactions. Responsible Officials Lcdo. Luis Rivera Villanueva Sec. Auxiliar de Recursos Humanos 787-765-2929 ext. 4273 Mrs. Luz S. Ramos Pedroza Specialist 787-765-2929 ext. 4273 Mrs. Maribel Zayas Payroll Officer Director 787-765-2929 ext. 4209 Estimated Completion Date Implementation is expected to be completed on or before the end of the fiscal year June 30, 2024.
Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 establish that the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. 2 CFR 200.430 establishes that the cost of compensation for personnel services is allowable to the extent that it follows an appointment made in accordance with the governmental unit's laws and rules and meets the merit system or other requirements required by federal law, where applicable. Compensation for personal services may also include fringe benefits which are addressed in §200.431 Compensation—fringe benefits. Costs of compensation are allowable to the extent that they satisfy the specific requirements of this part, and that the total compensation for individual employees: (1) Is reasonable for the services rendered and conforms to the established written policy of the non-Federal entity consistently applied to both Federal and non-Federal activities; (2) Follows an appointment made in accordance with a non-Federal entity's laws and/or rules or written policies and meets the requirements of Federal statute, where applicable; and (3) Is determined and supported as provided in paragraph (i) of this section, Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses, when applicable. (i) The Non-Federal entity establishes consistent written policies which apply uniformly to all faculty members, not just those working on Federal awards. Condition a. During our audit, on a sample of sixty (60) personnel files, we observed that the personnel files are not being kept current and in some instances were incomplete. b. One personnel file of federal funds was not provided for our evaluation. c. The PRDH does not have established written policies and manuals which can define standard internal controls for each program and / or region of the entity. Cause PRDH has not established an effective internal control designed to ensure the accuracy and completeness of the employee files. Also, the incompleteness of the files may depend of the time that the employee started working in the agency. Effect Due to law and regulation changes, incomplete files may result in inadequate documentation to support compliance with the criteria over management and administration of personnel files. Also, in the case of employees paid with federal funds, it may result in cost disallowances for personnel that do not meet the requirements to be employed by the corresponding federal program. Questioned Costs None Perspective Information Finding does not represent a significant problem. The Department has addressed this finding and it’s been taking the steps necessary to reduce incidences to a minimum. We selected 60 employee files from all agency. Prior Year Audit Finding 2021-002 Recommendation PRDH should immediately undertake a process to review all personnel files and validate that the minimum requirement documents are appropriately completed and included in each personnel file. Also, the PRDH must update the salary change form in file in order to reflect current salary as stated in the digital information system. Views of Responsible Officials During the month of August, the Office of Human Resources and Labor Relations was audited by the ADA. It is to this that we respond to the findings indicated in the audit, as follows: Over the past few years we have developed an internal control, using a document entitled Check sheet, which contains the list of documents required for the appointment of employees and another for the audit of files. It contains three columns for the collation of documents required by the Analysts of the Appointments and Changes Section and ends with the collation of the Division Supervisor, before being referred to the Personnel Officers of our regions. This document has been modified according to needs, changes, procedures and new regulations. It is important to mention that many of our audited personnel records pertain to employees appointed in years where the required requirements or documents were minimal, and no evidence was required or maintained in the personnel file. Related to the academic preparation contained in the personnel files, they are documents required by the Recruitment and Selection Section and these respond to the minimum requirements and alternatives of the class, according to the Agency's Classification Plan. Each class specification sets minimum requirements for the position the candidate will hold. On the other hand, when the previously known Administration of Health Services Facilities (AFASS) closed in 1999, its employees went to the Department of Health with the file they had, whose procedures and processes were not uniform to those of our Agency. The Regions and Hospitals have delegated the verification of documents, to work on appointments and other personnel transactions, such as job reclassifications, promotions and others. This delegation brings the process of standardizing and authorizing DSP-29 by the Recruitment and Selection Section, to ensure that it is complied with as established in the Classification Plan. The agency is in the process of updating these documents as long as a change in the employee's job classification is applied. These are transactions that allow us to update the employees’ record to the new class they will occupy. In the case of Doping Test results, we mention that these are found in the Medical Record of each employee. By HIPPA law, these are not filed in the personnel file. Of the aspects pointed out in the audit, the Department of Health has developed greater review and audit measures by the analysts of our agency, before the defunct Quality Control Section, who watched over and audited the personnel files of the Regions, providing control and compliance with the documents required according to the Regulations and Standards that govern the Office of Human Resources and Labor Relations. The Office of Human Resources presented a work plan to implement an effective and efficient personnel file review procedure to comply with and improve the agency's personnel processes and transactions. Responsible Officials Lcdo. Luis Rivera Villanueva Sec. Auxiliar de Recursos Humanos 787-765-2929 ext. 4273 Mrs. Luz S. Ramos Pedroza Specialist 787-765-2929 ext. 4273 Mrs. Maribel Zayas Payroll Officer Director 787-765-2929 ext. 4209 Estimated Completion Date Implementation is expected to be completed on or before the end of the fiscal year June 30, 2024.
Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 establish that the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. 2 CFR 200.430 establishes that the cost of compensation for personnel services is allowable to the extent that it follows an appointment made in accordance with the governmental unit's laws and rules and meets the merit system or other requirements required by federal law, where applicable. Compensation for personal services may also include fringe benefits which are addressed in §200.431 Compensation—fringe benefits. Costs of compensation are allowable to the extent that they satisfy the specific requirements of this part, and that the total compensation for individual employees: (1) Is reasonable for the services rendered and conforms to the established written policy of the non-Federal entity consistently applied to both Federal and non-Federal activities; (2) Follows an appointment made in accordance with a non-Federal entity's laws and/or rules or written policies and meets the requirements of Federal statute, where applicable; and (3) Is determined and supported as provided in paragraph (i) of this section, Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses, when applicable. (i) The Non-Federal entity establishes consistent written policies which apply uniformly to all faculty members, not just those working on Federal awards. Condition a. During our audit, on a sample of sixty (60) personnel files, we observed that the personnel files are not being kept current and in some instances were incomplete. b. One personnel file of federal funds was not provided for our evaluation. c. The PRDH does not have established written policies and manuals which can define standard internal controls for each program and / or region of the entity. Cause PRDH has not established an effective internal control designed to ensure the accuracy and completeness of the employee files. Also, the incompleteness of the files may depend of the time that the employee started working in the agency. Effect Due to law and regulation changes, incomplete files may result in inadequate documentation to support compliance with the criteria over management and administration of personnel files. Also, in the case of employees paid with federal funds, it may result in cost disallowances for personnel that do not meet the requirements to be employed by the corresponding federal program. Questioned Costs None Perspective Information Finding does not represent a significant problem. The Department has addressed this finding and it’s been taking the steps necessary to reduce incidences to a minimum. We selected 60 employee files from all agency. Prior Year Audit Finding 2021-002 Recommendation PRDH should immediately undertake a process to review all personnel files and validate that the minimum requirement documents are appropriately completed and included in each personnel file. Also, the PRDH must update the salary change form in file in order to reflect current salary as stated in the digital information system. Views of Responsible Officials During the month of August, the Office of Human Resources and Labor Relations was audited by the ADA. It is to this that we respond to the findings indicated in the audit, as follows: Over the past few years we have developed an internal control, using a document entitled Check sheet, which contains the list of documents required for the appointment of employees and another for the audit of files. It contains three columns for the collation of documents required by the Analysts of the Appointments and Changes Section and ends with the collation of the Division Supervisor, before being referred to the Personnel Officers of our regions. This document has been modified according to needs, changes, procedures and new regulations. It is important to mention that many of our audited personnel records pertain to employees appointed in years where the required requirements or documents were minimal, and no evidence was required or maintained in the personnel file. Related to the academic preparation contained in the personnel files, they are documents required by the Recruitment and Selection Section and these respond to the minimum requirements and alternatives of the class, according to the Agency's Classification Plan. Each class specification sets minimum requirements for the position the candidate will hold. On the other hand, when the previously known Administration of Health Services Facilities (AFASS) closed in 1999, its employees went to the Department of Health with the file they had, whose procedures and processes were not uniform to those of our Agency. The Regions and Hospitals have delegated the verification of documents, to work on appointments and other personnel transactions, such as job reclassifications, promotions and others. This delegation brings the process of standardizing and authorizing DSP-29 by the Recruitment and Selection Section, to ensure that it is complied with as established in the Classification Plan. The agency is in the process of updating these documents as long as a change in the employee's job classification is applied. These are transactions that allow us to update the employees’ record to the new class they will occupy. In the case of Doping Test results, we mention that these are found in the Medical Record of each employee. By HIPPA law, these are not filed in the personnel file. Of the aspects pointed out in the audit, the Department of Health has developed greater review and audit measures by the analysts of our agency, before the defunct Quality Control Section, who watched over and audited the personnel files of the Regions, providing control and compliance with the documents required according to the Regulations and Standards that govern the Office of Human Resources and Labor Relations. The Office of Human Resources presented a work plan to implement an effective and efficient personnel file review procedure to comply with and improve the agency's personnel processes and transactions. Responsible Officials Lcdo. Luis Rivera Villanueva Sec. Auxiliar de Recursos Humanos 787-765-2929 ext. 4273 Mrs. Luz S. Ramos Pedroza Specialist 787-765-2929 ext. 4273 Mrs. Maribel Zayas Payroll Officer Director 787-765-2929 ext. 4209 Estimated Completion Date Implementation is expected to be completed on or before the end of the fiscal year June 30, 2024.
Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 establish that the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. 2 CFR 200.430 establishes that the cost of compensation for personnel services is allowable to the extent that it follows an appointment made in accordance with the governmental unit's laws and rules and meets the merit system or other requirements required by federal law, where applicable. Compensation for personal services may also include fringe benefits which are addressed in §200.431 Compensation—fringe benefits. Costs of compensation are allowable to the extent that they satisfy the specific requirements of this part, and that the total compensation for individual employees: (1) Is reasonable for the services rendered and conforms to the established written policy of the non-Federal entity consistently applied to both Federal and non-Federal activities; (2) Follows an appointment made in accordance with a non-Federal entity's laws and/or rules or written policies and meets the requirements of Federal statute, where applicable; and (3) Is determined and supported as provided in paragraph (i) of this section, Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses, when applicable. (i) The Non-Federal entity establishes consistent written policies which apply uniformly to all faculty members, not just those working on Federal awards. Condition a. During our audit, on a sample of sixty (60) personnel files, we observed that the personnel files are not being kept current and in some instances were incomplete. b. One personnel file of federal funds was not provided for our evaluation. c. The PRDH does not have established written policies and manuals which can define standard internal controls for each program and / or region of the entity. Cause PRDH has not established an effective internal control designed to ensure the accuracy and completeness of the employee files. Also, the incompleteness of the files may depend of the time that the employee started working in the agency. Effect Due to law and regulation changes, incomplete files may result in inadequate documentation to support compliance with the criteria over management and administration of personnel files. Also, in the case of employees paid with federal funds, it may result in cost disallowances for personnel that do not meet the requirements to be employed by the corresponding federal program. Questioned Costs None Perspective Information Finding does not represent a significant problem. The Department has addressed this finding and it’s been taking the steps necessary to reduce incidences to a minimum. We selected 60 employee files from all agency. Prior Year Audit Finding 2021-002 Recommendation PRDH should immediately undertake a process to review all personnel files and validate that the minimum requirement documents are appropriately completed and included in each personnel file. Also, the PRDH must update the salary change form in file in order to reflect current salary as stated in the digital information system. Views of Responsible Officials During the month of August, the Office of Human Resources and Labor Relations was audited by the ADA. It is to this that we respond to the findings indicated in the audit, as follows: Over the past few years we have developed an internal control, using a document entitled Check sheet, which contains the list of documents required for the appointment of employees and another for the audit of files. It contains three columns for the collation of documents required by the Analysts of the Appointments and Changes Section and ends with the collation of the Division Supervisor, before being referred to the Personnel Officers of our regions. This document has been modified according to needs, changes, procedures and new regulations. It is important to mention that many of our audited personnel records pertain to employees appointed in years where the required requirements or documents were minimal, and no evidence was required or maintained in the personnel file. Related to the academic preparation contained in the personnel files, they are documents required by the Recruitment and Selection Section and these respond to the minimum requirements and alternatives of the class, according to the Agency's Classification Plan. Each class specification sets minimum requirements for the position the candidate will hold. On the other hand, when the previously known Administration of Health Services Facilities (AFASS) closed in 1999, its employees went to the Department of Health with the file they had, whose procedures and processes were not uniform to those of our Agency. The Regions and Hospitals have delegated the verification of documents, to work on appointments and other personnel transactions, such as job reclassifications, promotions and others. This delegation brings the process of standardizing and authorizing DSP-29 by the Recruitment and Selection Section, to ensure that it is complied with as established in the Classification Plan. The agency is in the process of updating these documents as long as a change in the employee's job classification is applied. These are transactions that allow us to update the employees’ record to the new class they will occupy. In the case of Doping Test results, we mention that these are found in the Medical Record of each employee. By HIPPA law, these are not filed in the personnel file. Of the aspects pointed out in the audit, the Department of Health has developed greater review and audit measures by the analysts of our agency, before the defunct Quality Control Section, who watched over and audited the personnel files of the Regions, providing control and compliance with the documents required according to the Regulations and Standards that govern the Office of Human Resources and Labor Relations. The Office of Human Resources presented a work plan to implement an effective and efficient personnel file review procedure to comply with and improve the agency's personnel processes and transactions. Responsible Officials Lcdo. Luis Rivera Villanueva Sec. Auxiliar de Recursos Humanos 787-765-2929 ext. 4273 Mrs. Luz S. Ramos Pedroza Specialist 787-765-2929 ext. 4273 Mrs. Maribel Zayas Payroll Officer Director 787-765-2929 ext. 4209 Estimated Completion Date Implementation is expected to be completed on or before the end of the fiscal year June 30, 2024.
Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 establish that the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. 2 CFR 200.430 establishes that the cost of compensation for personnel services is allowable to the extent that it follows an appointment made in accordance with the governmental unit's laws and rules and meets the merit system or other requirements required by federal law, where applicable. Compensation for personal services may also include fringe benefits which are addressed in §200.431 Compensation—fringe benefits. Costs of compensation are allowable to the extent that they satisfy the specific requirements of this part, and that the total compensation for individual employees: (1) Is reasonable for the services rendered and conforms to the established written policy of the non-Federal entity consistently applied to both Federal and non-Federal activities; (2) Follows an appointment made in accordance with a non-Federal entity's laws and/or rules or written policies and meets the requirements of Federal statute, where applicable; and (3) Is determined and supported as provided in paragraph (i) of this section, Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses, when applicable. (i) The Non-Federal entity establishes consistent written policies which apply uniformly to all faculty members, not just those working on Federal awards. Condition a. During our audit, on a sample of sixty (60) personnel files, we observed that the personnel files are not being kept current and in some instances were incomplete. b. One personnel file of federal funds was not provided for our evaluation. c. The PRDH does not have established written policies and manuals which can define standard internal controls for each program and / or region of the entity. Cause PRDH has not established an effective internal control designed to ensure the accuracy and completeness of the employee files. Also, the incompleteness of the files may depend of the time that the employee started working in the agency. Effect Due to law and regulation changes, incomplete files may result in inadequate documentation to support compliance with the criteria over management and administration of personnel files. Also, in the case of employees paid with federal funds, it may result in cost disallowances for personnel that do not meet the requirements to be employed by the corresponding federal program. Questioned Costs None Perspective Information Finding does not represent a significant problem. The Department has addressed this finding and it’s been taking the steps necessary to reduce incidences to a minimum. We selected 60 employee files from all agency. Prior Year Audit Finding 2021-002 Recommendation PRDH should immediately undertake a process to review all personnel files and validate that the minimum requirement documents are appropriately completed and included in each personnel file. Also, the PRDH must update the salary change form in file in order to reflect current salary as stated in the digital information system. Views of Responsible Officials During the month of August, the Office of Human Resources and Labor Relations was audited by the ADA. It is to this that we respond to the findings indicated in the audit, as follows: Over the past few years we have developed an internal control, using a document entitled Check sheet, which contains the list of documents required for the appointment of employees and another for the audit of files. It contains three columns for the collation of documents required by the Analysts of the Appointments and Changes Section and ends with the collation of the Division Supervisor, before being referred to the Personnel Officers of our regions. This document has been modified according to needs, changes, procedures and new regulations. It is important to mention that many of our audited personnel records pertain to employees appointed in years where the required requirements or documents were minimal, and no evidence was required or maintained in the personnel file. Related to the academic preparation contained in the personnel files, they are documents required by the Recruitment and Selection Section and these respond to the minimum requirements and alternatives of the class, according to the Agency's Classification Plan. Each class specification sets minimum requirements for the position the candidate will hold. On the other hand, when the previously known Administration of Health Services Facilities (AFASS) closed in 1999, its employees went to the Department of Health with the file they had, whose procedures and processes were not uniform to those of our Agency. The Regions and Hospitals have delegated the verification of documents, to work on appointments and other personnel transactions, such as job reclassifications, promotions and others. This delegation brings the process of standardizing and authorizing DSP-29 by the Recruitment and Selection Section, to ensure that it is complied with as established in the Classification Plan. The agency is in the process of updating these documents as long as a change in the employee's job classification is applied. These are transactions that allow us to update the employees’ record to the new class they will occupy. In the case of Doping Test results, we mention that these are found in the Medical Record of each employee. By HIPPA law, these are not filed in the personnel file. Of the aspects pointed out in the audit, the Department of Health has developed greater review and audit measures by the analysts of our agency, before the defunct Quality Control Section, who watched over and audited the personnel files of the Regions, providing control and compliance with the documents required according to the Regulations and Standards that govern the Office of Human Resources and Labor Relations. The Office of Human Resources presented a work plan to implement an effective and efficient personnel file review procedure to comply with and improve the agency's personnel processes and transactions. Responsible Officials Lcdo. Luis Rivera Villanueva Sec. Auxiliar de Recursos Humanos 787-765-2929 ext. 4273 Mrs. Luz S. Ramos Pedroza Specialist 787-765-2929 ext. 4273 Mrs. Maribel Zayas Payroll Officer Director 787-765-2929 ext. 4209 Estimated Completion Date Implementation is expected to be completed on or before the end of the fiscal year June 30, 2024.
Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 establish that the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. 2 CFR 200.430 establishes that the cost of compensation for personnel services is allowable to the extent that it follows an appointment made in accordance with the governmental unit's laws and rules and meets the merit system or other requirements required by federal law, where applicable. Compensation for personal services may also include fringe benefits which are addressed in §200.431 Compensation—fringe benefits. Costs of compensation are allowable to the extent that they satisfy the specific requirements of this part, and that the total compensation for individual employees: (1) Is reasonable for the services rendered and conforms to the established written policy of the non-Federal entity consistently applied to both Federal and non-Federal activities; (2) Follows an appointment made in accordance with a non-Federal entity's laws and/or rules or written policies and meets the requirements of Federal statute, where applicable; and (3) Is determined and supported as provided in paragraph (i) of this section, Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses, when applicable. (i) The Non-Federal entity establishes consistent written policies which apply uniformly to all faculty members, not just those working on Federal awards. Condition a. During our audit, on a sample of sixty (60) personnel files, we observed that the personnel files are not being kept current and in some instances were incomplete. b. One personnel file of federal funds was not provided for our evaluation. c. The PRDH does not have established written policies and manuals which can define standard internal controls for each program and / or region of the entity. Cause PRDH has not established an effective internal control designed to ensure the accuracy and completeness of the employee files. Also, the incompleteness of the files may depend of the time that the employee started working in the agency. Effect Due to law and regulation changes, incomplete files may result in inadequate documentation to support compliance with the criteria over management and administration of personnel files. Also, in the case of employees paid with federal funds, it may result in cost disallowances for personnel that do not meet the requirements to be employed by the corresponding federal program. Questioned Costs None Perspective Information Finding does not represent a significant problem. The Department has addressed this finding and it’s been taking the steps necessary to reduce incidences to a minimum. We selected 60 employee files from all agency. Prior Year Audit Finding 2021-002 Recommendation PRDH should immediately undertake a process to review all personnel files and validate that the minimum requirement documents are appropriately completed and included in each personnel file. Also, the PRDH must update the salary change form in file in order to reflect current salary as stated in the digital information system. Views of Responsible Officials During the month of August, the Office of Human Resources and Labor Relations was audited by the ADA. It is to this that we respond to the findings indicated in the audit, as follows: Over the past few years we have developed an internal control, using a document entitled Check sheet, which contains the list of documents required for the appointment of employees and another for the audit of files. It contains three columns for the collation of documents required by the Analysts of the Appointments and Changes Section and ends with the collation of the Division Supervisor, before being referred to the Personnel Officers of our regions. This document has been modified according to needs, changes, procedures and new regulations. It is important to mention that many of our audited personnel records pertain to employees appointed in years where the required requirements or documents were minimal, and no evidence was required or maintained in the personnel file. Related to the academic preparation contained in the personnel files, they are documents required by the Recruitment and Selection Section and these respond to the minimum requirements and alternatives of the class, according to the Agency's Classification Plan. Each class specification sets minimum requirements for the position the candidate will hold. On the other hand, when the previously known Administration of Health Services Facilities (AFASS) closed in 1999, its employees went to the Department of Health with the file they had, whose procedures and processes were not uniform to those of our Agency. The Regions and Hospitals have delegated the verification of documents, to work on appointments and other personnel transactions, such as job reclassifications, promotions and others. This delegation brings the process of standardizing and authorizing DSP-29 by the Recruitment and Selection Section, to ensure that it is complied with as established in the Classification Plan. The agency is in the process of updating these documents as long as a change in the employee's job classification is applied. These are transactions that allow us to update the employees’ record to the new class they will occupy. In the case of Doping Test results, we mention that these are found in the Medical Record of each employee. By HIPPA law, these are not filed in the personnel file. Of the aspects pointed out in the audit, the Department of Health has developed greater review and audit measures by the analysts of our agency, before the defunct Quality Control Section, who watched over and audited the personnel files of the Regions, providing control and compliance with the documents required according to the Regulations and Standards that govern the Office of Human Resources and Labor Relations. The Office of Human Resources presented a work plan to implement an effective and efficient personnel file review procedure to comply with and improve the agency's personnel processes and transactions. Responsible Officials Lcdo. Luis Rivera Villanueva Sec. Auxiliar de Recursos Humanos 787-765-2929 ext. 4273 Mrs. Luz S. Ramos Pedroza Specialist 787-765-2929 ext. 4273 Mrs. Maribel Zayas Payroll Officer Director 787-765-2929 ext. 4209 Estimated Completion Date Implementation is expected to be completed on or before the end of the fiscal year June 30, 2024.
Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 establish that the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. 2 CFR 200.430 establishes that the cost of compensation for personnel services is allowable to the extent that it follows an appointment made in accordance with the governmental unit's laws and rules and meets the merit system or other requirements required by federal law, where applicable. Compensation for personal services may also include fringe benefits which are addressed in §200.431 Compensation—fringe benefits. Costs of compensation are allowable to the extent that they satisfy the specific requirements of this part, and that the total compensation for individual employees: (1) Is reasonable for the services rendered and conforms to the established written policy of the non-Federal entity consistently applied to both Federal and non-Federal activities; (2) Follows an appointment made in accordance with a non-Federal entity's laws and/or rules or written policies and meets the requirements of Federal statute, where applicable; and (3) Is determined and supported as provided in paragraph (i) of this section, Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses, when applicable. (i) The Non-Federal entity establishes consistent written policies which apply uniformly to all faculty members, not just those working on Federal awards. Condition a. During our audit, on a sample of sixty (60) personnel files, we observed that the personnel files are not being kept current and in some instances were incomplete. b. One personnel file of federal funds was not provided for our evaluation. c. The PRDH does not have established written policies and manuals which can define standard internal controls for each program and / or region of the entity. Cause PRDH has not established an effective internal control designed to ensure the accuracy and completeness of the employee files. Also, the incompleteness of the files may depend of the time that the employee started working in the agency. Effect Due to law and regulation changes, incomplete files may result in inadequate documentation to support compliance with the criteria over management and administration of personnel files. Also, in the case of employees paid with federal funds, it may result in cost disallowances for personnel that do not meet the requirements to be employed by the corresponding federal program. Questioned Costs None Perspective Information Finding does not represent a significant problem. The Department has addressed this finding and it’s been taking the steps necessary to reduce incidences to a minimum. We selected 60 employee files from all agency. Prior Year Audit Finding 2021-002 Recommendation PRDH should immediately undertake a process to review all personnel files and validate that the minimum requirement documents are appropriately completed and included in each personnel file. Also, the PRDH must update the salary change form in file in order to reflect current salary as stated in the digital information system. Views of Responsible Officials During the month of August, the Office of Human Resources and Labor Relations was audited by the ADA. It is to this that we respond to the findings indicated in the audit, as follows: Over the past few years we have developed an internal control, using a document entitled Check sheet, which contains the list of documents required for the appointment of employees and another for the audit of files. It contains three columns for the collation of documents required by the Analysts of the Appointments and Changes Section and ends with the collation of the Division Supervisor, before being referred to the Personnel Officers of our regions. This document has been modified according to needs, changes, procedures and new regulations. It is important to mention that many of our audited personnel records pertain to employees appointed in years where the required requirements or documents were minimal, and no evidence was required or maintained in the personnel file. Related to the academic preparation contained in the personnel files, they are documents required by the Recruitment and Selection Section and these respond to the minimum requirements and alternatives of the class, according to the Agency's Classification Plan. Each class specification sets minimum requirements for the position the candidate will hold. On the other hand, when the previously known Administration of Health Services Facilities (AFASS) closed in 1999, its employees went to the Department of Health with the file they had, whose procedures and processes were not uniform to those of our Agency. The Regions and Hospitals have delegated the verification of documents, to work on appointments and other personnel transactions, such as job reclassifications, promotions and others. This delegation brings the process of standardizing and authorizing DSP-29 by the Recruitment and Selection Section, to ensure that it is complied with as established in the Classification Plan. The agency is in the process of updating these documents as long as a change in the employee's job classification is applied. These are transactions that allow us to update the employees’ record to the new class they will occupy. In the case of Doping Test results, we mention that these are found in the Medical Record of each employee. By HIPPA law, these are not filed in the personnel file. Of the aspects pointed out in the audit, the Department of Health has developed greater review and audit measures by the analysts of our agency, before the defunct Quality Control Section, who watched over and audited the personnel files of the Regions, providing control and compliance with the documents required according to the Regulations and Standards that govern the Office of Human Resources and Labor Relations. The Office of Human Resources presented a work plan to implement an effective and efficient personnel file review procedure to comply with and improve the agency's personnel processes and transactions. Responsible Officials Lcdo. Luis Rivera Villanueva Sec. Auxiliar de Recursos Humanos 787-765-2929 ext. 4273 Mrs. Luz S. Ramos Pedroza Specialist 787-765-2929 ext. 4273 Mrs. Maribel Zayas Payroll Officer Director 787-765-2929 ext. 4209 Estimated Completion Date Implementation is expected to be completed on or before the end of the fiscal year June 30, 2024.
Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 establish that the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. 2 CFR 200.430 establishes that the cost of compensation for personnel services is allowable to the extent that it follows an appointment made in accordance with the governmental unit's laws and rules and meets the merit system or other requirements required by federal law, where applicable. Compensation for personal services may also include fringe benefits which are addressed in §200.431 Compensation—fringe benefits. Costs of compensation are allowable to the extent that they satisfy the specific requirements of this part, and that the total compensation for individual employees: (1) Is reasonable for the services rendered and conforms to the established written policy of the non-Federal entity consistently applied to both Federal and non-Federal activities; (2) Follows an appointment made in accordance with a non-Federal entity's laws and/or rules or written policies and meets the requirements of Federal statute, where applicable; and (3) Is determined and supported as provided in paragraph (i) of this section, Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses, when applicable. (i) The Non-Federal entity establishes consistent written policies which apply uniformly to all faculty members, not just those working on Federal awards. Condition a. During our audit, on a sample of sixty (60) personnel files, we observed that the personnel files are not being kept current and in some instances were incomplete. b. One personnel file of federal funds was not provided for our evaluation. c. The PRDH does not have established written policies and manuals which can define standard internal controls for each program and / or region of the entity. Cause PRDH has not established an effective internal control designed to ensure the accuracy and completeness of the employee files. Also, the incompleteness of the files may depend of the time that the employee started working in the agency. Effect Due to law and regulation changes, incomplete files may result in inadequate documentation to support compliance with the criteria over management and administration of personnel files. Also, in the case of employees paid with federal funds, it may result in cost disallowances for personnel that do not meet the requirements to be employed by the corresponding federal program. Questioned Costs None Perspective Information Finding does not represent a significant problem. The Department has addressed this finding and it’s been taking the steps necessary to reduce incidences to a minimum. We selected 60 employee files from all agency. Prior Year Audit Finding 2021-002 Recommendation PRDH should immediately undertake a process to review all personnel files and validate that the minimum requirement documents are appropriately completed and included in each personnel file. Also, the PRDH must update the salary change form in file in order to reflect current salary as stated in the digital information system. Views of Responsible Officials During the month of August, the Office of Human Resources and Labor Relations was audited by the ADA. It is to this that we respond to the findings indicated in the audit, as follows: Over the past few years we have developed an internal control, using a document entitled Check sheet, which contains the list of documents required for the appointment of employees and another for the audit of files. It contains three columns for the collation of documents required by the Analysts of the Appointments and Changes Section and ends with the collation of the Division Supervisor, before being referred to the Personnel Officers of our regions. This document has been modified according to needs, changes, procedures and new regulations. It is important to mention that many of our audited personnel records pertain to employees appointed in years where the required requirements or documents were minimal, and no evidence was required or maintained in the personnel file. Related to the academic preparation contained in the personnel files, they are documents required by the Recruitment and Selection Section and these respond to the minimum requirements and alternatives of the class, according to the Agency's Classification Plan. Each class specification sets minimum requirements for the position the candidate will hold. On the other hand, when the previously known Administration of Health Services Facilities (AFASS) closed in 1999, its employees went to the Department of Health with the file they had, whose procedures and processes were not uniform to those of our Agency. The Regions and Hospitals have delegated the verification of documents, to work on appointments and other personnel transactions, such as job reclassifications, promotions and others. This delegation brings the process of standardizing and authorizing DSP-29 by the Recruitment and Selection Section, to ensure that it is complied with as established in the Classification Plan. The agency is in the process of updating these documents as long as a change in the employee's job classification is applied. These are transactions that allow us to update the employees’ record to the new class they will occupy. In the case of Doping Test results, we mention that these are found in the Medical Record of each employee. By HIPPA law, these are not filed in the personnel file. Of the aspects pointed out in the audit, the Department of Health has developed greater review and audit measures by the analysts of our agency, before the defunct Quality Control Section, who watched over and audited the personnel files of the Regions, providing control and compliance with the documents required according to the Regulations and Standards that govern the Office of Human Resources and Labor Relations. The Office of Human Resources presented a work plan to implement an effective and efficient personnel file review procedure to comply with and improve the agency's personnel processes and transactions. Responsible Officials Lcdo. Luis Rivera Villanueva Sec. Auxiliar de Recursos Humanos 787-765-2929 ext. 4273 Mrs. Luz S. Ramos Pedroza Specialist 787-765-2929 ext. 4273 Mrs. Maribel Zayas Payroll Officer Director 787-765-2929 ext. 4209 Estimated Completion Date Implementation is expected to be completed on or before the end of the fiscal year June 30, 2024.
Assistance Listing Number: 84.367 Program Title: Title II Improving Teacher Quality - Staff Development Federal Award Number: Not applicable Federal Award Year: 2021/2022 Pass Through Entity: Chicago Public Schools Criteria or specific requirement ? Per 2 CFR 200.430 (a) and 200.431 (a), charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages (may also include benefits) must be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. The percent of compensation for personnel services paid currently to employees rendered during the period of performance under the federal award, cannot exceed the percentage of costs approved in the consolidated grants application. Condition ? Title I wages and salaries (including benefits if applicable) paid currently does not equal (is less or greater than) the percentage of personnel costs approved in the grant. Questioned costs ? $416.00 Context ? Monitoring activities were conducted based on a questionnaire developed to help determine whether the appropriate program and fiscal components were in place and documentation maintained was on file as per grant requirements. The review consisted of examining records on file at the school, classroom observations, reviewing the school's organizational chart, and discussions with school staff, the principal and/or principal's designee. Cause ? This finding occurred, in part, due to employee turnover in the past year. There were no controls in place to ensure that all administrative requirements were met, and proper reviews and procedures were not being used for expenses that flow into the claim reimbursement. Effect - Without the proper review controls, there is a heightened risk that the Organization's report may not be accurate and could lead to funds having to be returned. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation ? Effective control and accountability must be maintained for all funds. Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed, according to 2 CFR 200.62, 200.302, and 200.303. Per 2 CFR 200.308 (b), recipients are required to report deviations from budget or project scope or objective, and request prior approval from the federal awarding agency. Copies of approved amendment(s) must be maintained on file to support any changes to the original approved application. For all unallowable claimed expenditures, funds must be returned to the Board to comply with Federal reporting requirements per 2 CFR 200.410. The school administrator is required to submit a claims adjustment in Oracle to start this process. View of Responsible Officials - Management agrees with the finding and is implementing a corrective action plan in November 2022.
Assistance Listing Number: 84.425U Program Title: COVID-19 Education Stabilization Fund - American Rescue Plan ? ESSER III ? MFT & Operating Fund Federal Award Number: N/A Federal Award Year: 2021/2022 Pass Through Entity: Chicago Public Schools Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.303, the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition: The Organization is either lacking or has nonconforming written policies and procedures for the following administrative functions, required by the Uniform Guidance: 1. Financial management - 2 CFR 200.302(b)(6) 2. Allowable Costs - 2 CFR 200.302(b)(7) 3. Federal payment - 2 CFR 200.305(b)(1) 4. Procurement - 2 CFR 200.318(a) and 2 CFR 200.318(c)(1) 5. Competition - 2 CFR 200.319(d) 6. Methods of procurement to be followed - 2 CFR 200.320 7. Compensation (Personal Services) - 2 CFR 200.430(a)(1) 8. Compensation (Fringe Benefits - Leave) - 2 CFR 200.431(b)(1) 9. Relocation costs of employees - 2 CFR 200.464(a)(2) 10. Travel costs - 2 CFR 200.474 Questioned Costs: There are no questioned costs related to the items described above. Context: The conditions outlined above are based on our review of the Organization?s policies and procedures, which were found to be not in accordance with Uniform Guidance. Cause: The Organization was not aware of the specific Uniform Guidance requirements for certain written policies and procedures. Effect: The Organization did not have these policies and procedures in place to reasonably ensure that program functions are achieved effectively, efficiently and in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. The Organization was not in compliance with the administrative requirements set forth in the Uniform Guidance. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization design procedures and implement internal control procedures to ensure that the Uniform Guidance administrative requirements are met. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with this finding and plans on implementing the appropriate policies and procedures in accordance with Uniform Guidance.
Assistance Listing Number: 84.425U Program Title: COVID-19 Education Stabilization Fund - American Rescue Plan ? ESSER III ? MFT & Operating Fund Federal Award Number: N/A Federal Award Year: 2021/2022 Pass Through Entity: Chicago Public Schools Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.303, the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition: The Organization is either lacking or has nonconforming written policies and procedures for the following administrative functions, required by the Uniform Guidance: 1. Financial management - 2 CFR 200.302(b)(6) 2. Allowable Costs - 2 CFR 200.302(b)(7) 3. Federal payment - 2 CFR 200.305(b)(1) 4. Procurement - 2 CFR 200.318(a) and 2 CFR 200.318(c)(1) 5. Competition - 2 CFR 200.319(d) 6. Methods of procurement to be followed - 2 CFR 200.320 7. Compensation (Personal Services) - 2 CFR 200.430(a)(1) 8. Compensation (Fringe Benefits - Leave) - 2 CFR 200.431(b)(1) 9. Relocation costs of employees - 2 CFR 200.464(a)(2) 10. Travel costs - 2 CFR 200.474 Questioned Costs: There are no questioned costs related to the items described above. Context: The conditions outlined above are based on our review of the Organization?s policies and procedures, which were found to be not in accordance with Uniform Guidance. Cause: The Organization was not aware of the specific Uniform Guidance requirements for certain written policies and procedures. Effect: The Organization did not have these policies and procedures in place to reasonably ensure that program functions are achieved effectively, efficiently and in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. The Organization was not in compliance with the administrative requirements set forth in the Uniform Guidance. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization design procedures and implement internal control procedures to ensure that the Uniform Guidance administrative requirements are met. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with this finding and plans on implementing the appropriate policies and procedures in accordance with Uniform Guidance.
Criteria: The Uniform Guidance requires nonfederal entities that receive federal awards to establish written policies, procedures, or standards of conduct as described in the following sections: Financial management (2 CFR 200.302) Payment (2 CFR 200.305) General procurement standards (2 CFR 200.318) Competition (2 CFR 200.319) Methods of procurement to be followed (2 CFR 200.320) Compensation ? personal services (2 CFR 200.430) Compensation ? fringe benefits (2 CFR 200.431) Transportation costs (2 CFR 200.474) Condition: The Town did not have written policies, procedures, and standards of conduct relative to federal awards as required by the Uniform Guidance. Cause: The Town was not aware of these requirements. Effect: The Town is not in compliance with the Uniform Guidance with respect to these written policies. Recommendation: We recommend that the Town update its policies and procedures to comply with the Uniform Guidance requirements mentioned above. Management?s Response: We agree that our existing policies do not explicitly address federal award compliance requirements. We will be updating the Town?s procedures and policies to incorporate the requirements of Part 200 of the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards.
Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Written Policies ALN Number: 10.664 Grant Number: 18-DG-11020000-050 Criteria: Title 2 of the U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) ? 180.300 (January 1, 2021) requires non-federal entities to verify an entity is not excluded or disqualified prior to entering into a covered transaction by, ?(a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that [entity]; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that [entity].? A good internal control plan requires adequate procedures to ensure the County has proper procedures in place to verify that contractors paid with grant funds are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal programs or activities. The Uniform Guidance requires nonfederal entities that receive federal awards to establish written policies, procedures, and or/standards of conduct, except if excluded in compliance supplement. There are four basic reasons for creating an internal control system through defining and documenting processes with well written policies and procedures: 1.Compliance 2.Operational Needs 3.Managing Risks 4.Continuous Improvement Complying with laws and regulations should be a critical function of the County. Well-defined and documented processes (i.e. procedures, training manuals) along with records that demonstrate process capability can make evident an effective internal control system and compliance to Federal guidelines. Another important role of documentation of procedures is to ensure processes fundamental to the County are properly guided by County?s officials, and are consistent way that meets the County?s needs, and that are important related information and data are captured and communicated. Documentation of procedures are important for controlling process, documenting the standard work that was performed and training new employees. Condition: The County lacks certain written policies and procedures required by Uniform Guidance. Although the County has an outdated Accounting Policy, certain policies for Federal Expenditures need to be updated and added. These include: 1. Financial management (200.302) 2.Payment (200.305) 3.General procurement standards (200.318) 4.Competition (200.319) 5.Methods of procurement to be followed (200.320) 6.Compensation ? personal services (200.430) 7.Compensation ? fringe benefits (200.431) 8.Relocation costs of employees (200.464) 9.Travel costs (200.474) Cause: Appears to be the result of a lack of training coupled with limited staffing and resources. Questioned Costs: None Context for Calculation Of Questioned Costs: None Effect: Without adequate procedures to ensure contractors are not suspended, debarred or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal programs or activities, there is an increased risk for the misuse of Federal funds and noncompliance with Federal regulations. Recommendation: We recommend the County implement procedures to ensure, prior to entering into a covered transaction, that a contractor in not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal programs or activities, and that procedures is adequately documented. Furthermore, the County should familiarize themselves with the Uniform Guidance and implement the following: 1.Develop and document all of its significant processes over federal awards. 2.Make the written policies and procedures available to all personnel and departments within the County 3.Ensure the written policies and procedures are accurate, complete, and current at all times (The Board of County Commissioners should update the policy on an annual basis.) 4.Revise policies and procedures for changes in business processes and policies over federal awards 5.Communicate significant changes to all affected personnel immediately to ensure they are aware of any revisions to their Responsibilities to the federal award. 6.Document policies and procedures to facilitate training and provide guidelines relative to federal awards for changes in personnel.
Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Written Policies ALN Number: 10.664 Grant Number: 18-DG-11020000-050 Criteria: Title 2 of the U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) ? 180.300 (January 1, 2021) requires non-federal entities to verify an entity is not excluded or disqualified prior to entering into a covered transaction by, ?(a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that [entity]; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that [entity].? A good internal control plan requires adequate procedures to ensure the County has proper procedures in place to verify that contractors paid with grant funds are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal programs or activities. The Uniform Guidance requires nonfederal entities that receive federal awards to establish written policies, procedures, and or/standards of conduct, except if excluded in compliance supplement. There are four basic reasons for creating an internal control system through defining and documenting processes with well written policies and procedures: 1.Compliance 2.Operational Needs 3.Managing Risks 4.Continuous Improvement Complying with laws and regulations should be a critical function of the County. Well-defined and documented processes (i.e. procedures, training manuals) along with records that demonstrate process capability can make evident an effective internal control system and compliance to Federal guidelines. Another important role of documentation of procedures is to ensure processes fundamental to the County are properly guided by County?s officials, and are consistent way that meets the County?s needs, and that are important related information and data are captured and communicated. Documentation of procedures are important for controlling process, documenting the standard work that was performed and training new employees. Condition: The County lacks certain written policies and procedures required by Uniform Guidance. Although the County has an outdated Accounting Policy, certain policies for Federal Expenditures need to be updated and added. These include: 1. Financial management (200.302) 2.Payment (200.305) 3.General procurement standards (200.318) 4.Competition (200.319) 5.Methods of procurement to be followed (200.320) 6.Compensation ? personal services (200.430) 7.Compensation ? fringe benefits (200.431) 8.Relocation costs of employees (200.464) 9.Travel costs (200.474) Cause: Appears to be the result of a lack of training coupled with limited staffing and resources. Questioned Costs: None Context for Calculation Of Questioned Costs: None Effect: Without adequate procedures to ensure contractors are not suspended, debarred or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal programs or activities, there is an increased risk for the misuse of Federal funds and noncompliance with Federal regulations. Recommendation: We recommend the County implement procedures to ensure, prior to entering into a covered transaction, that a contractor in not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal programs or activities, and that procedures is adequately documented. Furthermore, the County should familiarize themselves with the Uniform Guidance and implement the following: 1.Develop and document all of its significant processes over federal awards. 2.Make the written policies and procedures available to all personnel and departments within the County 3.Ensure the written policies and procedures are accurate, complete, and current at all times (The Board of County Commissioners should update the policy on an annual basis.) 4.Revise policies and procedures for changes in business processes and policies over federal awards 5.Communicate significant changes to all affected personnel immediately to ensure they are aware of any revisions to their Responsibilities to the federal award. 6.Document policies and procedures to facilitate training and provide guidelines relative to federal awards for changes in personnel.
2022 ? 003 Allowable Activities and Costs - Payroll Disbursements Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Centers for Disease Control and Prevention U.S. Department of Health & Human Services Federal Program Name: COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF) COVID-19 Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases (ELC) Child Support Enforcement Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 93.323 93.563 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: 1505-0271 - 2021 6NU50CK000539-01-08 DHHS-CDC - 2020 Pass-Through Agency: California Department of Public Health Heluna Health California Department of Child Support Services Pass-Through Number(s): COVID-19ELC29 and COVID-19ELC87 0187.3380 21-06 Award Period: May 26, 2021 - December 31, 2026 May 18, 2020 - November 17, 2022 and January 15, 2021 - July 31, 2023 May 1, 2020 - March 31, 2022 July 1, 2021 - June 30, 2022 Type of Finding: ? Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance ? Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: According to the Assistance Listing Description for CSLFRF and ELC, Subpart D, Post Federal; Award Requirements and Subpart E, Cost Principles apply to the assistance listing. According to the LCSA Fiscal and Administrative Policy Manual Revised 2021, costs allowable for reimbursement under the Child Support IV-D award are governed by federal regulations. Title 2, ?200.403, ?200.404, and Title 45, Part 304 provide general guidelines for determining cost allowability. According to ? 200.302 Financial management of 2 CFR Part 200, the financial management system of each nonfederal entity must provide for written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with subpart E of this part and the terms and conditions of the federal award. According to ? 200.303 Internal controls of 2 CFR Part 200, the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. According to ? 200.403 Factors affecting allowability of costs of 2 CFR Part 200, except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the nonfederal entity in order to be allowable under federal awards. According to ? 200.430 Compensation?personal services of 2 CFR Part 200, costs of compensation are allowable to the extent that they satisfy the specific requirements of this part, and that the total compensation for individual employees: 1. Is reasonable for the services rendered and conforms to the established written policy of the nonfederal entity consistently applied to both federal and nonfederal activities; 2. Follows an appointment made in accordance with a nonfederal entity's laws and/or rules or written policies and meets the requirements of federal statute, where applicable; and 3. Is determined and supported as provided in paragraph (i) of this section, when applicable. According to ? 200.431 Compensation-fringe benefits of 2 CFR Part 200, except as provided elsewhere in these principles, the costs of fringe benefits are allowable provided that the benefits are reasonable and are required by law, nonfederal entity-employee agreement, or an established policy of the nonfederal entity. Condition: The County does not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs nor an established written policy for compensation-personal services and fringe benefits. Questioned costs: Unknown Context: During our testing, we noted the County charged various types of salaries and benefits to the grants. The County does not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs. Specific to compensation-personal services and fringe benefits, there is not an established written policy for us to test that personnel costs charged to grants conform to, follows an appointment in accordance with, and are required by an established policy of the County. Cause: Management oversight. Effect: The auditor noted instances of noncompliance. Noncompliance results in potential unallowable costs charged to grants. Recommendation: We recommend the County establish written procedures for determining the allowability of costs to include a written policy regarding the charging of personnel costs to grants. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement from responsible officials.
2022 ? 003 Allowable Activities and Costs - Payroll Disbursements Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Centers for Disease Control and Prevention U.S. Department of Health & Human Services Federal Program Name: COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF) COVID-19 Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases (ELC) Child Support Enforcement Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 93.323 93.563 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: 1505-0271 - 2021 6NU50CK000539-01-08 DHHS-CDC - 2020 Pass-Through Agency: California Department of Public Health Heluna Health California Department of Child Support Services Pass-Through Number(s): COVID-19ELC29 and COVID-19ELC87 0187.3380 21-06 Award Period: May 26, 2021 - December 31, 2026 May 18, 2020 - November 17, 2022 and January 15, 2021 - July 31, 2023 May 1, 2020 - March 31, 2022 July 1, 2021 - June 30, 2022 Type of Finding: ? Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance ? Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: According to the Assistance Listing Description for CSLFRF and ELC, Subpart D, Post Federal; Award Requirements and Subpart E, Cost Principles apply to the assistance listing. According to the LCSA Fiscal and Administrative Policy Manual Revised 2021, costs allowable for reimbursement under the Child Support IV-D award are governed by federal regulations. Title 2, ?200.403, ?200.404, and Title 45, Part 304 provide general guidelines for determining cost allowability. According to ? 200.302 Financial management of 2 CFR Part 200, the financial management system of each nonfederal entity must provide for written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with subpart E of this part and the terms and conditions of the federal award. According to ? 200.303 Internal controls of 2 CFR Part 200, the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. According to ? 200.403 Factors affecting allowability of costs of 2 CFR Part 200, except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the nonfederal entity in order to be allowable under federal awards. According to ? 200.430 Compensation?personal services of 2 CFR Part 200, costs of compensation are allowable to the extent that they satisfy the specific requirements of this part, and that the total compensation for individual employees: 1. Is reasonable for the services rendered and conforms to the established written policy of the nonfederal entity consistently applied to both federal and nonfederal activities; 2. Follows an appointment made in accordance with a nonfederal entity's laws and/or rules or written policies and meets the requirements of federal statute, where applicable; and 3. Is determined and supported as provided in paragraph (i) of this section, when applicable. According to ? 200.431 Compensation-fringe benefits of 2 CFR Part 200, except as provided elsewhere in these principles, the costs of fringe benefits are allowable provided that the benefits are reasonable and are required by law, nonfederal entity-employee agreement, or an established policy of the nonfederal entity. Condition: The County does not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs nor an established written policy for compensation-personal services and fringe benefits. Questioned costs: Unknown Context: During our testing, we noted the County charged various types of salaries and benefits to the grants. The County does not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs. Specific to compensation-personal services and fringe benefits, there is not an established written policy for us to test that personnel costs charged to grants conform to, follows an appointment in accordance with, and are required by an established policy of the County. Cause: Management oversight. Effect: The auditor noted instances of noncompliance. Noncompliance results in potential unallowable costs charged to grants. Recommendation: We recommend the County establish written procedures for determining the allowability of costs to include a written policy regarding the charging of personnel costs to grants. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement from responsible officials.
2022 ? 003 Allowable Activities and Costs - Payroll Disbursements Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Centers for Disease Control and Prevention U.S. Department of Health & Human Services Federal Program Name: COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF) COVID-19 Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases (ELC) Child Support Enforcement Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 93.323 93.563 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: 1505-0271 - 2021 6NU50CK000539-01-08 DHHS-CDC - 2020 Pass-Through Agency: California Department of Public Health Heluna Health California Department of Child Support Services Pass-Through Number(s): COVID-19ELC29 and COVID-19ELC87 0187.3380 21-06 Award Period: May 26, 2021 - December 31, 2026 May 18, 2020 - November 17, 2022 and January 15, 2021 - July 31, 2023 May 1, 2020 - March 31, 2022 July 1, 2021 - June 30, 2022 Type of Finding: ? Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance ? Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: According to the Assistance Listing Description for CSLFRF and ELC, Subpart D, Post Federal; Award Requirements and Subpart E, Cost Principles apply to the assistance listing. According to the LCSA Fiscal and Administrative Policy Manual Revised 2021, costs allowable for reimbursement under the Child Support IV-D award are governed by federal regulations. Title 2, ?200.403, ?200.404, and Title 45, Part 304 provide general guidelines for determining cost allowability. According to ? 200.302 Financial management of 2 CFR Part 200, the financial management system of each nonfederal entity must provide for written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with subpart E of this part and the terms and conditions of the federal award. According to ? 200.303 Internal controls of 2 CFR Part 200, the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. According to ? 200.403 Factors affecting allowability of costs of 2 CFR Part 200, except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the nonfederal entity in order to be allowable under federal awards. According to ? 200.430 Compensation?personal services of 2 CFR Part 200, costs of compensation are allowable to the extent that they satisfy the specific requirements of this part, and that the total compensation for individual employees: 1. Is reasonable for the services rendered and conforms to the established written policy of the nonfederal entity consistently applied to both federal and nonfederal activities; 2. Follows an appointment made in accordance with a nonfederal entity's laws and/or rules or written policies and meets the requirements of federal statute, where applicable; and 3. Is determined and supported as provided in paragraph (i) of this section, when applicable. According to ? 200.431 Compensation-fringe benefits of 2 CFR Part 200, except as provided elsewhere in these principles, the costs of fringe benefits are allowable provided that the benefits are reasonable and are required by law, nonfederal entity-employee agreement, or an established policy of the nonfederal entity. Condition: The County does not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs nor an established written policy for compensation-personal services and fringe benefits. Questioned costs: Unknown Context: During our testing, we noted the County charged various types of salaries and benefits to the grants. The County does not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs. Specific to compensation-personal services and fringe benefits, there is not an established written policy for us to test that personnel costs charged to grants conform to, follows an appointment in accordance with, and are required by an established policy of the County. Cause: Management oversight. Effect: The auditor noted instances of noncompliance. Noncompliance results in potential unallowable costs charged to grants. Recommendation: We recommend the County establish written procedures for determining the allowability of costs to include a written policy regarding the charging of personnel costs to grants. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement from responsible officials.
2022-001: Procurement Policy and Procedures Condition: Several purchases were made in excess of the micro purchase threshold ($10,000). The Organization could not provide documentation to show they obtained quotes, or the reason quotes were not obtained, or if they gave preference to minority or women-owned businesses. Cause: The Organization has not established a written procurement policy. Criteria: The Code of Federal Regulations requires that entities receiving federal funding have a written procurement policy. The required elements of the procurement policy are detailed out in the Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR) under Title 2, Subtitle A, Part 200, Subpart D, 200.317 thru 200.327. Several other areas require written policies: financial management (200.302), federal payment (200.305), compensation-personal services (200.430), compensation-fringe benefits (200.431), relocation costs of employees (200.464), and travel costs (200.475). Effect: Lack of such policies increases the risk of purchasing items at higher prices than may have been necessary, increases the risk of limiting competition, and increases the risk of waste and abuse. Perspective Information: The need for a procurement policy was brought to the CEO's attention in the fall of 2021. The CEO does believe the spirit of the procurement requirements were met. Recommendations: We recommend quotes are obtained whenever possible when purchases are expected to be between $10,000 and $250,000. If purchases are to equal or exceed $250,000, the proper bidding procedures should be followed. Bidding procedures, quotes, and efforts to give preference to minority or women-owned businesses should be documented, including documenting if bids or quotes could not be obtained or the reasons why bids or quotes were not obtained. We also recommend a procurement policy is established as soon as possible and an individual is assigned to monitor the implementation of the policy. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The Club agrees with this finding. Their intent is to create and implement a procurement policy that complies with the Code of Federal Regulations as soon as possible and add the proper documentation for purchases exceeding the micro purchase threshold beginning with fiscal year 2023. See Corrective Action Plan.
2022-001: Procurement Policy and Procedures Condition: Several purchases were made in excess of the micro purchase threshold ($10,000). The Organization could not provide documentation to show they obtained quotes, or the reason quotes were not obtained, or if they gave preference to minority or women-owned businesses. Cause: The Organization has not established a written procurement policy. Criteria: The Code of Federal Regulations requires that entities receiving federal funding have a written procurement policy. The required elements of the procurement policy are detailed out in the Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR) under Title 2, Subtitle A, Part 200, Subpart D, 200.317 thru 200.327. Several other areas require written policies: financial management (200.302), federal payment (200.305), compensation-personal services (200.430), compensation-fringe benefits (200.431), relocation costs of employees (200.464), and travel costs (200.475). Effect: Lack of such policies increases the risk of purchasing items at higher prices than may have been necessary, increases the risk of limiting competition, and increases the risk of waste and abuse. Perspective Information: The need for a procurement policy was brought to the CEO's attention in the fall of 2021. The CEO does believe the spirit of the procurement requirements were met. Recommendations: We recommend quotes are obtained whenever possible when purchases are expected to be between $10,000 and $250,000. If purchases are to equal or exceed $250,000, the proper bidding procedures should be followed. Bidding procedures, quotes, and efforts to give preference to minority or women-owned businesses should be documented, including documenting if bids or quotes could not be obtained or the reasons why bids or quotes were not obtained. We also recommend a procurement policy is established as soon as possible and an individual is assigned to monitor the implementation of the policy. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The Club agrees with this finding. Their intent is to create and implement a procurement policy that complies with the Code of Federal Regulations as soon as possible and add the proper documentation for purchases exceeding the micro purchase threshold beginning with fiscal year 2023. See Corrective Action Plan.
2022-001: Procurement Policy and Procedures Condition: Several purchases were made in excess of the micro purchase threshold ($10,000). The Organization could not provide documentation to show they obtained quotes, or the reason quotes were not obtained, or if they gave preference to minority or women-owned businesses. Cause: The Organization has not established a written procurement policy. Criteria: The Code of Federal Regulations requires that entities receiving federal funding have a written procurement policy. The required elements of the procurement policy are detailed out in the Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR) under Title 2, Subtitle A, Part 200, Subpart D, 200.317 thru 200.327. Several other areas require written policies: financial management (200.302), federal payment (200.305), compensation-personal services (200.430), compensation-fringe benefits (200.431), relocation costs of employees (200.464), and travel costs (200.475). Effect: Lack of such policies increases the risk of purchasing items at higher prices than may have been necessary, increases the risk of limiting competition, and increases the risk of waste and abuse. Perspective Information: The need for a procurement policy was brought to the CEO's attention in the fall of 2021. The CEO does believe the spirit of the procurement requirements were met. Recommendations: We recommend quotes are obtained whenever possible when purchases are expected to be between $10,000 and $250,000. If purchases are to equal or exceed $250,000, the proper bidding procedures should be followed. Bidding procedures, quotes, and efforts to give preference to minority or women-owned businesses should be documented, including documenting if bids or quotes could not be obtained or the reasons why bids or quotes were not obtained. We also recommend a procurement policy is established as soon as possible and an individual is assigned to monitor the implementation of the policy. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The Club agrees with this finding. Their intent is to create and implement a procurement policy that complies with the Code of Federal Regulations as soon as possible and add the proper documentation for purchases exceeding the micro purchase threshold beginning with fiscal year 2023. See Corrective Action Plan.
Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 establish that the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. 2 CFR 200.430 establishes that the cost of compensation for personnel services is allowable to the extent that it follows an appointment made in accordance with the governmental unit's laws and rules and meets the merit system or other requirements required by federal law, where applicable. Compensation for personal services may also include fringe benefits which are addressed in §200.431 Compensation—fringe benefits. Costs of compensation are allowable to the extent that they satisfy the specific requirements of this part, and that the total compensation for individual employees: (1) Is reasonable for the services rendered and conforms to the established written policy of the non-Federal entity consistently applied to both Federal and non-Federal activities; (2) Follows an appointment made in accordance with a non-Federal entity's laws and/or rules or written policies and meets the requirements of Federal statute, where applicable; and (3) Is determined and supported as provided in paragraph (i) of this section, Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses, when applicable. (i) The Non-Federal entity establishes consistent written policies which apply uniformly to all faculty members, not just those working on Federal awards. Condition a. During our audit, on a sample of sixty (60) personnel files, we observed that the personnel files are not being kept current and in some instances were incomplete. b. One personnel file of federal funds was not provided for our evaluation. c. The PRDH does not have established written policies and manuals which can define standard internal controls for each program and / or region of the entity. Cause PRDH has not established an effective internal control designed to ensure the accuracy and completeness of the employee files. Also, the incompleteness of the files may depend of the time that the employee started working in the agency. Effect Due to law and regulation changes, incomplete files may result in inadequate documentation to support compliance with the criteria over management and administration of personnel files. Also, in the case of employees paid with federal funds, it may result in cost disallowances for personnel that do not meet the requirements to be employed by the corresponding federal program. Questioned Costs None Perspective Information Finding does not represent a significant problem. The Department has addressed this finding and it’s been taking the steps necessary to reduce incidences to a minimum. We selected 60 employee files from all agency. Prior Year Audit Finding 2021-002 Recommendation PRDH should immediately undertake a process to review all personnel files and validate that the minimum requirement documents are appropriately completed and included in each personnel file. Also, the PRDH must update the salary change form in file in order to reflect current salary as stated in the digital information system. Views of Responsible Officials During the month of August, the Office of Human Resources and Labor Relations was audited by the ADA. It is to this that we respond to the findings indicated in the audit, as follows: Over the past few years we have developed an internal control, using a document entitled Check sheet, which contains the list of documents required for the appointment of employees and another for the audit of files. It contains three columns for the collation of documents required by the Analysts of the Appointments and Changes Section and ends with the collation of the Division Supervisor, before being referred to the Personnel Officers of our regions. This document has been modified according to needs, changes, procedures and new regulations. It is important to mention that many of our audited personnel records pertain to employees appointed in years where the required requirements or documents were minimal, and no evidence was required or maintained in the personnel file. Related to the academic preparation contained in the personnel files, they are documents required by the Recruitment and Selection Section and these respond to the minimum requirements and alternatives of the class, according to the Agency's Classification Plan. Each class specification sets minimum requirements for the position the candidate will hold. On the other hand, when the previously known Administration of Health Services Facilities (AFASS) closed in 1999, its employees went to the Department of Health with the file they had, whose procedures and processes were not uniform to those of our Agency. The Regions and Hospitals have delegated the verification of documents, to work on appointments and other personnel transactions, such as job reclassifications, promotions and others. This delegation brings the process of standardizing and authorizing DSP-29 by the Recruitment and Selection Section, to ensure that it is complied with as established in the Classification Plan. The agency is in the process of updating these documents as long as a change in the employee's job classification is applied. These are transactions that allow us to update the employees’ record to the new class they will occupy. In the case of Doping Test results, we mention that these are found in the Medical Record of each employee. By HIPPA law, these are not filed in the personnel file. Of the aspects pointed out in the audit, the Department of Health has developed greater review and audit measures by the analysts of our agency, before the defunct Quality Control Section, who watched over and audited the personnel files of the Regions, providing control and compliance with the documents required according to the Regulations and Standards that govern the Office of Human Resources and Labor Relations. The Office of Human Resources presented a work plan to implement an effective and efficient personnel file review procedure to comply with and improve the agency's personnel processes and transactions. Responsible Officials Lcdo. Luis Rivera Villanueva Sec. Auxiliar de Recursos Humanos 787-765-2929 ext. 4273 Mrs. Luz S. Ramos Pedroza Specialist 787-765-2929 ext. 4273 Mrs. Maribel Zayas Payroll Officer Director 787-765-2929 ext. 4209 Estimated Completion Date Implementation is expected to be completed on or before the end of the fiscal year June 30, 2024.
Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 establish that the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. 2 CFR 200.430 establishes that the cost of compensation for personnel services is allowable to the extent that it follows an appointment made in accordance with the governmental unit's laws and rules and meets the merit system or other requirements required by federal law, where applicable. Compensation for personal services may also include fringe benefits which are addressed in §200.431 Compensation—fringe benefits. Costs of compensation are allowable to the extent that they satisfy the specific requirements of this part, and that the total compensation for individual employees: (1) Is reasonable for the services rendered and conforms to the established written policy of the non-Federal entity consistently applied to both Federal and non-Federal activities; (2) Follows an appointment made in accordance with a non-Federal entity's laws and/or rules or written policies and meets the requirements of Federal statute, where applicable; and (3) Is determined and supported as provided in paragraph (i) of this section, Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses, when applicable. (i) The Non-Federal entity establishes consistent written policies which apply uniformly to all faculty members, not just those working on Federal awards. Condition a. During our audit, on a sample of sixty (60) personnel files, we observed that the personnel files are not being kept current and in some instances were incomplete. b. One personnel file of federal funds was not provided for our evaluation. c. The PRDH does not have established written policies and manuals which can define standard internal controls for each program and / or region of the entity. Cause PRDH has not established an effective internal control designed to ensure the accuracy and completeness of the employee files. Also, the incompleteness of the files may depend of the time that the employee started working in the agency. Effect Due to law and regulation changes, incomplete files may result in inadequate documentation to support compliance with the criteria over management and administration of personnel files. Also, in the case of employees paid with federal funds, it may result in cost disallowances for personnel that do not meet the requirements to be employed by the corresponding federal program. Questioned Costs None Perspective Information Finding does not represent a significant problem. The Department has addressed this finding and it’s been taking the steps necessary to reduce incidences to a minimum. We selected 60 employee files from all agency. Prior Year Audit Finding 2021-002 Recommendation PRDH should immediately undertake a process to review all personnel files and validate that the minimum requirement documents are appropriately completed and included in each personnel file. Also, the PRDH must update the salary change form in file in order to reflect current salary as stated in the digital information system. Views of Responsible Officials During the month of August, the Office of Human Resources and Labor Relations was audited by the ADA. It is to this that we respond to the findings indicated in the audit, as follows: Over the past few years we have developed an internal control, using a document entitled Check sheet, which contains the list of documents required for the appointment of employees and another for the audit of files. It contains three columns for the collation of documents required by the Analysts of the Appointments and Changes Section and ends with the collation of the Division Supervisor, before being referred to the Personnel Officers of our regions. This document has been modified according to needs, changes, procedures and new regulations. It is important to mention that many of our audited personnel records pertain to employees appointed in years where the required requirements or documents were minimal, and no evidence was required or maintained in the personnel file. Related to the academic preparation contained in the personnel files, they are documents required by the Recruitment and Selection Section and these respond to the minimum requirements and alternatives of the class, according to the Agency's Classification Plan. Each class specification sets minimum requirements for the position the candidate will hold. On the other hand, when the previously known Administration of Health Services Facilities (AFASS) closed in 1999, its employees went to the Department of Health with the file they had, whose procedures and processes were not uniform to those of our Agency. The Regions and Hospitals have delegated the verification of documents, to work on appointments and other personnel transactions, such as job reclassifications, promotions and others. This delegation brings the process of standardizing and authorizing DSP-29 by the Recruitment and Selection Section, to ensure that it is complied with as established in the Classification Plan. The agency is in the process of updating these documents as long as a change in the employee's job classification is applied. These are transactions that allow us to update the employees’ record to the new class they will occupy. In the case of Doping Test results, we mention that these are found in the Medical Record of each employee. By HIPPA law, these are not filed in the personnel file. Of the aspects pointed out in the audit, the Department of Health has developed greater review and audit measures by the analysts of our agency, before the defunct Quality Control Section, who watched over and audited the personnel files of the Regions, providing control and compliance with the documents required according to the Regulations and Standards that govern the Office of Human Resources and Labor Relations. The Office of Human Resources presented a work plan to implement an effective and efficient personnel file review procedure to comply with and improve the agency's personnel processes and transactions. Responsible Officials Lcdo. Luis Rivera Villanueva Sec. Auxiliar de Recursos Humanos 787-765-2929 ext. 4273 Mrs. Luz S. Ramos Pedroza Specialist 787-765-2929 ext. 4273 Mrs. Maribel Zayas Payroll Officer Director 787-765-2929 ext. 4209 Estimated Completion Date Implementation is expected to be completed on or before the end of the fiscal year June 30, 2024.
Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 establish that the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. 2 CFR 200.430 establishes that the cost of compensation for personnel services is allowable to the extent that it follows an appointment made in accordance with the governmental unit's laws and rules and meets the merit system or other requirements required by federal law, where applicable. Compensation for personal services may also include fringe benefits which are addressed in §200.431 Compensation—fringe benefits. Costs of compensation are allowable to the extent that they satisfy the specific requirements of this part, and that the total compensation for individual employees: (1) Is reasonable for the services rendered and conforms to the established written policy of the non-Federal entity consistently applied to both Federal and non-Federal activities; (2) Follows an appointment made in accordance with a non-Federal entity's laws and/or rules or written policies and meets the requirements of Federal statute, where applicable; and (3) Is determined and supported as provided in paragraph (i) of this section, Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses, when applicable. (i) The Non-Federal entity establishes consistent written policies which apply uniformly to all faculty members, not just those working on Federal awards. Condition a. During our audit, on a sample of sixty (60) personnel files, we observed that the personnel files are not being kept current and in some instances were incomplete. b. One personnel file of federal funds was not provided for our evaluation. c. The PRDH does not have established written policies and manuals which can define standard internal controls for each program and / or region of the entity. Cause PRDH has not established an effective internal control designed to ensure the accuracy and completeness of the employee files. Also, the incompleteness of the files may depend of the time that the employee started working in the agency. Effect Due to law and regulation changes, incomplete files may result in inadequate documentation to support compliance with the criteria over management and administration of personnel files. Also, in the case of employees paid with federal funds, it may result in cost disallowances for personnel that do not meet the requirements to be employed by the corresponding federal program. Questioned Costs None Perspective Information Finding does not represent a significant problem. The Department has addressed this finding and it’s been taking the steps necessary to reduce incidences to a minimum. We selected 60 employee files from all agency. Prior Year Audit Finding 2021-002 Recommendation PRDH should immediately undertake a process to review all personnel files and validate that the minimum requirement documents are appropriately completed and included in each personnel file. Also, the PRDH must update the salary change form in file in order to reflect current salary as stated in the digital information system. Views of Responsible Officials During the month of August, the Office of Human Resources and Labor Relations was audited by the ADA. It is to this that we respond to the findings indicated in the audit, as follows: Over the past few years we have developed an internal control, using a document entitled Check sheet, which contains the list of documents required for the appointment of employees and another for the audit of files. It contains three columns for the collation of documents required by the Analysts of the Appointments and Changes Section and ends with the collation of the Division Supervisor, before being referred to the Personnel Officers of our regions. This document has been modified according to needs, changes, procedures and new regulations. It is important to mention that many of our audited personnel records pertain to employees appointed in years where the required requirements or documents were minimal, and no evidence was required or maintained in the personnel file. Related to the academic preparation contained in the personnel files, they are documents required by the Recruitment and Selection Section and these respond to the minimum requirements and alternatives of the class, according to the Agency's Classification Plan. Each class specification sets minimum requirements for the position the candidate will hold. On the other hand, when the previously known Administration of Health Services Facilities (AFASS) closed in 1999, its employees went to the Department of Health with the file they had, whose procedures and processes were not uniform to those of our Agency. The Regions and Hospitals have delegated the verification of documents, to work on appointments and other personnel transactions, such as job reclassifications, promotions and others. This delegation brings the process of standardizing and authorizing DSP-29 by the Recruitment and Selection Section, to ensure that it is complied with as established in the Classification Plan. The agency is in the process of updating these documents as long as a change in the employee's job classification is applied. These are transactions that allow us to update the employees’ record to the new class they will occupy. In the case of Doping Test results, we mention that these are found in the Medical Record of each employee. By HIPPA law, these are not filed in the personnel file. Of the aspects pointed out in the audit, the Department of Health has developed greater review and audit measures by the analysts of our agency, before the defunct Quality Control Section, who watched over and audited the personnel files of the Regions, providing control and compliance with the documents required according to the Regulations and Standards that govern the Office of Human Resources and Labor Relations. The Office of Human Resources presented a work plan to implement an effective and efficient personnel file review procedure to comply with and improve the agency's personnel processes and transactions. Responsible Officials Lcdo. Luis Rivera Villanueva Sec. Auxiliar de Recursos Humanos 787-765-2929 ext. 4273 Mrs. Luz S. Ramos Pedroza Specialist 787-765-2929 ext. 4273 Mrs. Maribel Zayas Payroll Officer Director 787-765-2929 ext. 4209 Estimated Completion Date Implementation is expected to be completed on or before the end of the fiscal year June 30, 2024.
Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 establish that the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. 2 CFR 200.430 establishes that the cost of compensation for personnel services is allowable to the extent that it follows an appointment made in accordance with the governmental unit's laws and rules and meets the merit system or other requirements required by federal law, where applicable. Compensation for personal services may also include fringe benefits which are addressed in §200.431 Compensation—fringe benefits. Costs of compensation are allowable to the extent that they satisfy the specific requirements of this part, and that the total compensation for individual employees: (1) Is reasonable for the services rendered and conforms to the established written policy of the non-Federal entity consistently applied to both Federal and non-Federal activities; (2) Follows an appointment made in accordance with a non-Federal entity's laws and/or rules or written policies and meets the requirements of Federal statute, where applicable; and (3) Is determined and supported as provided in paragraph (i) of this section, Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses, when applicable. (i) The Non-Federal entity establishes consistent written policies which apply uniformly to all faculty members, not just those working on Federal awards. Condition a. During our audit, on a sample of sixty (60) personnel files, we observed that the personnel files are not being kept current and in some instances were incomplete. b. One personnel file of federal funds was not provided for our evaluation. c. The PRDH does not have established written policies and manuals which can define standard internal controls for each program and / or region of the entity. Cause PRDH has not established an effective internal control designed to ensure the accuracy and completeness of the employee files. Also, the incompleteness of the files may depend of the time that the employee started working in the agency. Effect Due to law and regulation changes, incomplete files may result in inadequate documentation to support compliance with the criteria over management and administration of personnel files. Also, in the case of employees paid with federal funds, it may result in cost disallowances for personnel that do not meet the requirements to be employed by the corresponding federal program. Questioned Costs None Perspective Information Finding does not represent a significant problem. The Department has addressed this finding and it’s been taking the steps necessary to reduce incidences to a minimum. We selected 60 employee files from all agency. Prior Year Audit Finding 2021-002 Recommendation PRDH should immediately undertake a process to review all personnel files and validate that the minimum requirement documents are appropriately completed and included in each personnel file. Also, the PRDH must update the salary change form in file in order to reflect current salary as stated in the digital information system. Views of Responsible Officials During the month of August, the Office of Human Resources and Labor Relations was audited by the ADA. It is to this that we respond to the findings indicated in the audit, as follows: Over the past few years we have developed an internal control, using a document entitled Check sheet, which contains the list of documents required for the appointment of employees and another for the audit of files. It contains three columns for the collation of documents required by the Analysts of the Appointments and Changes Section and ends with the collation of the Division Supervisor, before being referred to the Personnel Officers of our regions. This document has been modified according to needs, changes, procedures and new regulations. It is important to mention that many of our audited personnel records pertain to employees appointed in years where the required requirements or documents were minimal, and no evidence was required or maintained in the personnel file. Related to the academic preparation contained in the personnel files, they are documents required by the Recruitment and Selection Section and these respond to the minimum requirements and alternatives of the class, according to the Agency's Classification Plan. Each class specification sets minimum requirements for the position the candidate will hold. On the other hand, when the previously known Administration of Health Services Facilities (AFASS) closed in 1999, its employees went to the Department of Health with the file they had, whose procedures and processes were not uniform to those of our Agency. The Regions and Hospitals have delegated the verification of documents, to work on appointments and other personnel transactions, such as job reclassifications, promotions and others. This delegation brings the process of standardizing and authorizing DSP-29 by the Recruitment and Selection Section, to ensure that it is complied with as established in the Classification Plan. The agency is in the process of updating these documents as long as a change in the employee's job classification is applied. These are transactions that allow us to update the employees’ record to the new class they will occupy. In the case of Doping Test results, we mention that these are found in the Medical Record of each employee. By HIPPA law, these are not filed in the personnel file. Of the aspects pointed out in the audit, the Department of Health has developed greater review and audit measures by the analysts of our agency, before the defunct Quality Control Section, who watched over and audited the personnel files of the Regions, providing control and compliance with the documents required according to the Regulations and Standards that govern the Office of Human Resources and Labor Relations. The Office of Human Resources presented a work plan to implement an effective and efficient personnel file review procedure to comply with and improve the agency's personnel processes and transactions. Responsible Officials Lcdo. Luis Rivera Villanueva Sec. Auxiliar de Recursos Humanos 787-765-2929 ext. 4273 Mrs. Luz S. Ramos Pedroza Specialist 787-765-2929 ext. 4273 Mrs. Maribel Zayas Payroll Officer Director 787-765-2929 ext. 4209 Estimated Completion Date Implementation is expected to be completed on or before the end of the fiscal year June 30, 2024.
Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 establish that the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. 2 CFR 200.430 establishes that the cost of compensation for personnel services is allowable to the extent that it follows an appointment made in accordance with the governmental unit's laws and rules and meets the merit system or other requirements required by federal law, where applicable. Compensation for personal services may also include fringe benefits which are addressed in §200.431 Compensation—fringe benefits. Costs of compensation are allowable to the extent that they satisfy the specific requirements of this part, and that the total compensation for individual employees: (1) Is reasonable for the services rendered and conforms to the established written policy of the non-Federal entity consistently applied to both Federal and non-Federal activities; (2) Follows an appointment made in accordance with a non-Federal entity's laws and/or rules or written policies and meets the requirements of Federal statute, where applicable; and (3) Is determined and supported as provided in paragraph (i) of this section, Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses, when applicable. (i) The Non-Federal entity establishes consistent written policies which apply uniformly to all faculty members, not just those working on Federal awards. Condition a. During our audit, on a sample of sixty (60) personnel files, we observed that the personnel files are not being kept current and in some instances were incomplete. b. One personnel file of federal funds was not provided for our evaluation. c. The PRDH does not have established written policies and manuals which can define standard internal controls for each program and / or region of the entity. Cause PRDH has not established an effective internal control designed to ensure the accuracy and completeness of the employee files. Also, the incompleteness of the files may depend of the time that the employee started working in the agency. Effect Due to law and regulation changes, incomplete files may result in inadequate documentation to support compliance with the criteria over management and administration of personnel files. Also, in the case of employees paid with federal funds, it may result in cost disallowances for personnel that do not meet the requirements to be employed by the corresponding federal program. Questioned Costs None Perspective Information Finding does not represent a significant problem. The Department has addressed this finding and it’s been taking the steps necessary to reduce incidences to a minimum. We selected 60 employee files from all agency. Prior Year Audit Finding 2021-002 Recommendation PRDH should immediately undertake a process to review all personnel files and validate that the minimum requirement documents are appropriately completed and included in each personnel file. Also, the PRDH must update the salary change form in file in order to reflect current salary as stated in the digital information system. Views of Responsible Officials During the month of August, the Office of Human Resources and Labor Relations was audited by the ADA. It is to this that we respond to the findings indicated in the audit, as follows: Over the past few years we have developed an internal control, using a document entitled Check sheet, which contains the list of documents required for the appointment of employees and another for the audit of files. It contains three columns for the collation of documents required by the Analysts of the Appointments and Changes Section and ends with the collation of the Division Supervisor, before being referred to the Personnel Officers of our regions. This document has been modified according to needs, changes, procedures and new regulations. It is important to mention that many of our audited personnel records pertain to employees appointed in years where the required requirements or documents were minimal, and no evidence was required or maintained in the personnel file. Related to the academic preparation contained in the personnel files, they are documents required by the Recruitment and Selection Section and these respond to the minimum requirements and alternatives of the class, according to the Agency's Classification Plan. Each class specification sets minimum requirements for the position the candidate will hold. On the other hand, when the previously known Administration of Health Services Facilities (AFASS) closed in 1999, its employees went to the Department of Health with the file they had, whose procedures and processes were not uniform to those of our Agency. The Regions and Hospitals have delegated the verification of documents, to work on appointments and other personnel transactions, such as job reclassifications, promotions and others. This delegation brings the process of standardizing and authorizing DSP-29 by the Recruitment and Selection Section, to ensure that it is complied with as established in the Classification Plan. The agency is in the process of updating these documents as long as a change in the employee's job classification is applied. These are transactions that allow us to update the employees’ record to the new class they will occupy. In the case of Doping Test results, we mention that these are found in the Medical Record of each employee. By HIPPA law, these are not filed in the personnel file. Of the aspects pointed out in the audit, the Department of Health has developed greater review and audit measures by the analysts of our agency, before the defunct Quality Control Section, who watched over and audited the personnel files of the Regions, providing control and compliance with the documents required according to the Regulations and Standards that govern the Office of Human Resources and Labor Relations. The Office of Human Resources presented a work plan to implement an effective and efficient personnel file review procedure to comply with and improve the agency's personnel processes and transactions. Responsible Officials Lcdo. Luis Rivera Villanueva Sec. Auxiliar de Recursos Humanos 787-765-2929 ext. 4273 Mrs. Luz S. Ramos Pedroza Specialist 787-765-2929 ext. 4273 Mrs. Maribel Zayas Payroll Officer Director 787-765-2929 ext. 4209 Estimated Completion Date Implementation is expected to be completed on or before the end of the fiscal year June 30, 2024.
Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 establish that the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. 2 CFR 200.430 establishes that the cost of compensation for personnel services is allowable to the extent that it follows an appointment made in accordance with the governmental unit's laws and rules and meets the merit system or other requirements required by federal law, where applicable. Compensation for personal services may also include fringe benefits which are addressed in §200.431 Compensation—fringe benefits. Costs of compensation are allowable to the extent that they satisfy the specific requirements of this part, and that the total compensation for individual employees: (1) Is reasonable for the services rendered and conforms to the established written policy of the non-Federal entity consistently applied to both Federal and non-Federal activities; (2) Follows an appointment made in accordance with a non-Federal entity's laws and/or rules or written policies and meets the requirements of Federal statute, where applicable; and (3) Is determined and supported as provided in paragraph (i) of this section, Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses, when applicable. (i) The Non-Federal entity establishes consistent written policies which apply uniformly to all faculty members, not just those working on Federal awards. Condition a. During our audit, on a sample of sixty (60) personnel files, we observed that the personnel files are not being kept current and in some instances were incomplete. b. One personnel file of federal funds was not provided for our evaluation. c. The PRDH does not have established written policies and manuals which can define standard internal controls for each program and / or region of the entity. Cause PRDH has not established an effective internal control designed to ensure the accuracy and completeness of the employee files. Also, the incompleteness of the files may depend of the time that the employee started working in the agency. Effect Due to law and regulation changes, incomplete files may result in inadequate documentation to support compliance with the criteria over management and administration of personnel files. Also, in the case of employees paid with federal funds, it may result in cost disallowances for personnel that do not meet the requirements to be employed by the corresponding federal program. Questioned Costs None Perspective Information Finding does not represent a significant problem. The Department has addressed this finding and it’s been taking the steps necessary to reduce incidences to a minimum. We selected 60 employee files from all agency. Prior Year Audit Finding 2021-002 Recommendation PRDH should immediately undertake a process to review all personnel files and validate that the minimum requirement documents are appropriately completed and included in each personnel file. Also, the PRDH must update the salary change form in file in order to reflect current salary as stated in the digital information system. Views of Responsible Officials During the month of August, the Office of Human Resources and Labor Relations was audited by the ADA. It is to this that we respond to the findings indicated in the audit, as follows: Over the past few years we have developed an internal control, using a document entitled Check sheet, which contains the list of documents required for the appointment of employees and another for the audit of files. It contains three columns for the collation of documents required by the Analysts of the Appointments and Changes Section and ends with the collation of the Division Supervisor, before being referred to the Personnel Officers of our regions. This document has been modified according to needs, changes, procedures and new regulations. It is important to mention that many of our audited personnel records pertain to employees appointed in years where the required requirements or documents were minimal, and no evidence was required or maintained in the personnel file. Related to the academic preparation contained in the personnel files, they are documents required by the Recruitment and Selection Section and these respond to the minimum requirements and alternatives of the class, according to the Agency's Classification Plan. Each class specification sets minimum requirements for the position the candidate will hold. On the other hand, when the previously known Administration of Health Services Facilities (AFASS) closed in 1999, its employees went to the Department of Health with the file they had, whose procedures and processes were not uniform to those of our Agency. The Regions and Hospitals have delegated the verification of documents, to work on appointments and other personnel transactions, such as job reclassifications, promotions and others. This delegation brings the process of standardizing and authorizing DSP-29 by the Recruitment and Selection Section, to ensure that it is complied with as established in the Classification Plan. The agency is in the process of updating these documents as long as a change in the employee's job classification is applied. These are transactions that allow us to update the employees’ record to the new class they will occupy. In the case of Doping Test results, we mention that these are found in the Medical Record of each employee. By HIPPA law, these are not filed in the personnel file. Of the aspects pointed out in the audit, the Department of Health has developed greater review and audit measures by the analysts of our agency, before the defunct Quality Control Section, who watched over and audited the personnel files of the Regions, providing control and compliance with the documents required according to the Regulations and Standards that govern the Office of Human Resources and Labor Relations. The Office of Human Resources presented a work plan to implement an effective and efficient personnel file review procedure to comply with and improve the agency's personnel processes and transactions. Responsible Officials Lcdo. Luis Rivera Villanueva Sec. Auxiliar de Recursos Humanos 787-765-2929 ext. 4273 Mrs. Luz S. Ramos Pedroza Specialist 787-765-2929 ext. 4273 Mrs. Maribel Zayas Payroll Officer Director 787-765-2929 ext. 4209 Estimated Completion Date Implementation is expected to be completed on or before the end of the fiscal year June 30, 2024.
Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 establish that the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. 2 CFR 200.430 establishes that the cost of compensation for personnel services is allowable to the extent that it follows an appointment made in accordance with the governmental unit's laws and rules and meets the merit system or other requirements required by federal law, where applicable. Compensation for personal services may also include fringe benefits which are addressed in §200.431 Compensation—fringe benefits. Costs of compensation are allowable to the extent that they satisfy the specific requirements of this part, and that the total compensation for individual employees: (1) Is reasonable for the services rendered and conforms to the established written policy of the non-Federal entity consistently applied to both Federal and non-Federal activities; (2) Follows an appointment made in accordance with a non-Federal entity's laws and/or rules or written policies and meets the requirements of Federal statute, where applicable; and (3) Is determined and supported as provided in paragraph (i) of this section, Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses, when applicable. (i) The Non-Federal entity establishes consistent written policies which apply uniformly to all faculty members, not just those working on Federal awards. Condition a. During our audit, on a sample of sixty (60) personnel files, we observed that the personnel files are not being kept current and in some instances were incomplete. b. One personnel file of federal funds was not provided for our evaluation. c. The PRDH does not have established written policies and manuals which can define standard internal controls for each program and / or region of the entity. Cause PRDH has not established an effective internal control designed to ensure the accuracy and completeness of the employee files. Also, the incompleteness of the files may depend of the time that the employee started working in the agency. Effect Due to law and regulation changes, incomplete files may result in inadequate documentation to support compliance with the criteria over management and administration of personnel files. Also, in the case of employees paid with federal funds, it may result in cost disallowances for personnel that do not meet the requirements to be employed by the corresponding federal program. Questioned Costs None Perspective Information Finding does not represent a significant problem. The Department has addressed this finding and it’s been taking the steps necessary to reduce incidences to a minimum. We selected 60 employee files from all agency. Prior Year Audit Finding 2021-002 Recommendation PRDH should immediately undertake a process to review all personnel files and validate that the minimum requirement documents are appropriately completed and included in each personnel file. Also, the PRDH must update the salary change form in file in order to reflect current salary as stated in the digital information system. Views of Responsible Officials During the month of August, the Office of Human Resources and Labor Relations was audited by the ADA. It is to this that we respond to the findings indicated in the audit, as follows: Over the past few years we have developed an internal control, using a document entitled Check sheet, which contains the list of documents required for the appointment of employees and another for the audit of files. It contains three columns for the collation of documents required by the Analysts of the Appointments and Changes Section and ends with the collation of the Division Supervisor, before being referred to the Personnel Officers of our regions. This document has been modified according to needs, changes, procedures and new regulations. It is important to mention that many of our audited personnel records pertain to employees appointed in years where the required requirements or documents were minimal, and no evidence was required or maintained in the personnel file. Related to the academic preparation contained in the personnel files, they are documents required by the Recruitment and Selection Section and these respond to the minimum requirements and alternatives of the class, according to the Agency's Classification Plan. Each class specification sets minimum requirements for the position the candidate will hold. On the other hand, when the previously known Administration of Health Services Facilities (AFASS) closed in 1999, its employees went to the Department of Health with the file they had, whose procedures and processes were not uniform to those of our Agency. The Regions and Hospitals have delegated the verification of documents, to work on appointments and other personnel transactions, such as job reclassifications, promotions and others. This delegation brings the process of standardizing and authorizing DSP-29 by the Recruitment and Selection Section, to ensure that it is complied with as established in the Classification Plan. The agency is in the process of updating these documents as long as a change in the employee's job classification is applied. These are transactions that allow us to update the employees’ record to the new class they will occupy. In the case of Doping Test results, we mention that these are found in the Medical Record of each employee. By HIPPA law, these are not filed in the personnel file. Of the aspects pointed out in the audit, the Department of Health has developed greater review and audit measures by the analysts of our agency, before the defunct Quality Control Section, who watched over and audited the personnel files of the Regions, providing control and compliance with the documents required according to the Regulations and Standards that govern the Office of Human Resources and Labor Relations. The Office of Human Resources presented a work plan to implement an effective and efficient personnel file review procedure to comply with and improve the agency's personnel processes and transactions. Responsible Officials Lcdo. Luis Rivera Villanueva Sec. Auxiliar de Recursos Humanos 787-765-2929 ext. 4273 Mrs. Luz S. Ramos Pedroza Specialist 787-765-2929 ext. 4273 Mrs. Maribel Zayas Payroll Officer Director 787-765-2929 ext. 4209 Estimated Completion Date Implementation is expected to be completed on or before the end of the fiscal year June 30, 2024.
Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 establish that the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. 2 CFR 200.430 establishes that the cost of compensation for personnel services is allowable to the extent that it follows an appointment made in accordance with the governmental unit's laws and rules and meets the merit system or other requirements required by federal law, where applicable. Compensation for personal services may also include fringe benefits which are addressed in §200.431 Compensation—fringe benefits. Costs of compensation are allowable to the extent that they satisfy the specific requirements of this part, and that the total compensation for individual employees: (1) Is reasonable for the services rendered and conforms to the established written policy of the non-Federal entity consistently applied to both Federal and non-Federal activities; (2) Follows an appointment made in accordance with a non-Federal entity's laws and/or rules or written policies and meets the requirements of Federal statute, where applicable; and (3) Is determined and supported as provided in paragraph (i) of this section, Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses, when applicable. (i) The Non-Federal entity establishes consistent written policies which apply uniformly to all faculty members, not just those working on Federal awards. Condition a. During our audit, on a sample of sixty (60) personnel files, we observed that the personnel files are not being kept current and in some instances were incomplete. b. One personnel file of federal funds was not provided for our evaluation. c. The PRDH does not have established written policies and manuals which can define standard internal controls for each program and / or region of the entity. Cause PRDH has not established an effective internal control designed to ensure the accuracy and completeness of the employee files. Also, the incompleteness of the files may depend of the time that the employee started working in the agency. Effect Due to law and regulation changes, incomplete files may result in inadequate documentation to support compliance with the criteria over management and administration of personnel files. Also, in the case of employees paid with federal funds, it may result in cost disallowances for personnel that do not meet the requirements to be employed by the corresponding federal program. Questioned Costs None Perspective Information Finding does not represent a significant problem. The Department has addressed this finding and it’s been taking the steps necessary to reduce incidences to a minimum. We selected 60 employee files from all agency. Prior Year Audit Finding 2021-002 Recommendation PRDH should immediately undertake a process to review all personnel files and validate that the minimum requirement documents are appropriately completed and included in each personnel file. Also, the PRDH must update the salary change form in file in order to reflect current salary as stated in the digital information system. Views of Responsible Officials During the month of August, the Office of Human Resources and Labor Relations was audited by the ADA. It is to this that we respond to the findings indicated in the audit, as follows: Over the past few years we have developed an internal control, using a document entitled Check sheet, which contains the list of documents required for the appointment of employees and another for the audit of files. It contains three columns for the collation of documents required by the Analysts of the Appointments and Changes Section and ends with the collation of the Division Supervisor, before being referred to the Personnel Officers of our regions. This document has been modified according to needs, changes, procedures and new regulations. It is important to mention that many of our audited personnel records pertain to employees appointed in years where the required requirements or documents were minimal, and no evidence was required or maintained in the personnel file. Related to the academic preparation contained in the personnel files, they are documents required by the Recruitment and Selection Section and these respond to the minimum requirements and alternatives of the class, according to the Agency's Classification Plan. Each class specification sets minimum requirements for the position the candidate will hold. On the other hand, when the previously known Administration of Health Services Facilities (AFASS) closed in 1999, its employees went to the Department of Health with the file they had, whose procedures and processes were not uniform to those of our Agency. The Regions and Hospitals have delegated the verification of documents, to work on appointments and other personnel transactions, such as job reclassifications, promotions and others. This delegation brings the process of standardizing and authorizing DSP-29 by the Recruitment and Selection Section, to ensure that it is complied with as established in the Classification Plan. The agency is in the process of updating these documents as long as a change in the employee's job classification is applied. These are transactions that allow us to update the employees’ record to the new class they will occupy. In the case of Doping Test results, we mention that these are found in the Medical Record of each employee. By HIPPA law, these are not filed in the personnel file. Of the aspects pointed out in the audit, the Department of Health has developed greater review and audit measures by the analysts of our agency, before the defunct Quality Control Section, who watched over and audited the personnel files of the Regions, providing control and compliance with the documents required according to the Regulations and Standards that govern the Office of Human Resources and Labor Relations. The Office of Human Resources presented a work plan to implement an effective and efficient personnel file review procedure to comply with and improve the agency's personnel processes and transactions. Responsible Officials Lcdo. Luis Rivera Villanueva Sec. Auxiliar de Recursos Humanos 787-765-2929 ext. 4273 Mrs. Luz S. Ramos Pedroza Specialist 787-765-2929 ext. 4273 Mrs. Maribel Zayas Payroll Officer Director 787-765-2929 ext. 4209 Estimated Completion Date Implementation is expected to be completed on or before the end of the fiscal year June 30, 2024.
Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 establish that the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. 2 CFR 200.430 establishes that the cost of compensation for personnel services is allowable to the extent that it follows an appointment made in accordance with the governmental unit's laws and rules and meets the merit system or other requirements required by federal law, where applicable. Compensation for personal services may also include fringe benefits which are addressed in §200.431 Compensation—fringe benefits. Costs of compensation are allowable to the extent that they satisfy the specific requirements of this part, and that the total compensation for individual employees: (1) Is reasonable for the services rendered and conforms to the established written policy of the non-Federal entity consistently applied to both Federal and non-Federal activities; (2) Follows an appointment made in accordance with a non-Federal entity's laws and/or rules or written policies and meets the requirements of Federal statute, where applicable; and (3) Is determined and supported as provided in paragraph (i) of this section, Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses, when applicable. (i) The Non-Federal entity establishes consistent written policies which apply uniformly to all faculty members, not just those working on Federal awards. Condition a. During our audit, on a sample of sixty (60) personnel files, we observed that the personnel files are not being kept current and in some instances were incomplete. b. One personnel file of federal funds was not provided for our evaluation. c. The PRDH does not have established written policies and manuals which can define standard internal controls for each program and / or region of the entity. Cause PRDH has not established an effective internal control designed to ensure the accuracy and completeness of the employee files. Also, the incompleteness of the files may depend of the time that the employee started working in the agency. Effect Due to law and regulation changes, incomplete files may result in inadequate documentation to support compliance with the criteria over management and administration of personnel files. Also, in the case of employees paid with federal funds, it may result in cost disallowances for personnel that do not meet the requirements to be employed by the corresponding federal program. Questioned Costs None Perspective Information Finding does not represent a significant problem. The Department has addressed this finding and it’s been taking the steps necessary to reduce incidences to a minimum. We selected 60 employee files from all agency. Prior Year Audit Finding 2021-002 Recommendation PRDH should immediately undertake a process to review all personnel files and validate that the minimum requirement documents are appropriately completed and included in each personnel file. Also, the PRDH must update the salary change form in file in order to reflect current salary as stated in the digital information system. Views of Responsible Officials During the month of August, the Office of Human Resources and Labor Relations was audited by the ADA. It is to this that we respond to the findings indicated in the audit, as follows: Over the past few years we have developed an internal control, using a document entitled Check sheet, which contains the list of documents required for the appointment of employees and another for the audit of files. It contains three columns for the collation of documents required by the Analysts of the Appointments and Changes Section and ends with the collation of the Division Supervisor, before being referred to the Personnel Officers of our regions. This document has been modified according to needs, changes, procedures and new regulations. It is important to mention that many of our audited personnel records pertain to employees appointed in years where the required requirements or documents were minimal, and no evidence was required or maintained in the personnel file. Related to the academic preparation contained in the personnel files, they are documents required by the Recruitment and Selection Section and these respond to the minimum requirements and alternatives of the class, according to the Agency's Classification Plan. Each class specification sets minimum requirements for the position the candidate will hold. On the other hand, when the previously known Administration of Health Services Facilities (AFASS) closed in 1999, its employees went to the Department of Health with the file they had, whose procedures and processes were not uniform to those of our Agency. The Regions and Hospitals have delegated the verification of documents, to work on appointments and other personnel transactions, such as job reclassifications, promotions and others. This delegation brings the process of standardizing and authorizing DSP-29 by the Recruitment and Selection Section, to ensure that it is complied with as established in the Classification Plan. The agency is in the process of updating these documents as long as a change in the employee's job classification is applied. These are transactions that allow us to update the employees’ record to the new class they will occupy. In the case of Doping Test results, we mention that these are found in the Medical Record of each employee. By HIPPA law, these are not filed in the personnel file. Of the aspects pointed out in the audit, the Department of Health has developed greater review and audit measures by the analysts of our agency, before the defunct Quality Control Section, who watched over and audited the personnel files of the Regions, providing control and compliance with the documents required according to the Regulations and Standards that govern the Office of Human Resources and Labor Relations. The Office of Human Resources presented a work plan to implement an effective and efficient personnel file review procedure to comply with and improve the agency's personnel processes and transactions. Responsible Officials Lcdo. Luis Rivera Villanueva Sec. Auxiliar de Recursos Humanos 787-765-2929 ext. 4273 Mrs. Luz S. Ramos Pedroza Specialist 787-765-2929 ext. 4273 Mrs. Maribel Zayas Payroll Officer Director 787-765-2929 ext. 4209 Estimated Completion Date Implementation is expected to be completed on or before the end of the fiscal year June 30, 2024.
Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 establish that the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. 2 CFR 200.430 establishes that the cost of compensation for personnel services is allowable to the extent that it follows an appointment made in accordance with the governmental unit's laws and rules and meets the merit system or other requirements required by federal law, where applicable. Compensation for personal services may also include fringe benefits which are addressed in §200.431 Compensation—fringe benefits. Costs of compensation are allowable to the extent that they satisfy the specific requirements of this part, and that the total compensation for individual employees: (1) Is reasonable for the services rendered and conforms to the established written policy of the non-Federal entity consistently applied to both Federal and non-Federal activities; (2) Follows an appointment made in accordance with a non-Federal entity's laws and/or rules or written policies and meets the requirements of Federal statute, where applicable; and (3) Is determined and supported as provided in paragraph (i) of this section, Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses, when applicable. (i) The Non-Federal entity establishes consistent written policies which apply uniformly to all faculty members, not just those working on Federal awards. Condition a. During our audit, on a sample of sixty (60) personnel files, we observed that the personnel files are not being kept current and in some instances were incomplete. b. One personnel file of federal funds was not provided for our evaluation. c. The PRDH does not have established written policies and manuals which can define standard internal controls for each program and / or region of the entity. Cause PRDH has not established an effective internal control designed to ensure the accuracy and completeness of the employee files. Also, the incompleteness of the files may depend of the time that the employee started working in the agency. Effect Due to law and regulation changes, incomplete files may result in inadequate documentation to support compliance with the criteria over management and administration of personnel files. Also, in the case of employees paid with federal funds, it may result in cost disallowances for personnel that do not meet the requirements to be employed by the corresponding federal program. Questioned Costs None Perspective Information Finding does not represent a significant problem. The Department has addressed this finding and it’s been taking the steps necessary to reduce incidences to a minimum. We selected 60 employee files from all agency. Prior Year Audit Finding 2021-002 Recommendation PRDH should immediately undertake a process to review all personnel files and validate that the minimum requirement documents are appropriately completed and included in each personnel file. Also, the PRDH must update the salary change form in file in order to reflect current salary as stated in the digital information system. Views of Responsible Officials During the month of August, the Office of Human Resources and Labor Relations was audited by the ADA. It is to this that we respond to the findings indicated in the audit, as follows: Over the past few years we have developed an internal control, using a document entitled Check sheet, which contains the list of documents required for the appointment of employees and another for the audit of files. It contains three columns for the collation of documents required by the Analysts of the Appointments and Changes Section and ends with the collation of the Division Supervisor, before being referred to the Personnel Officers of our regions. This document has been modified according to needs, changes, procedures and new regulations. It is important to mention that many of our audited personnel records pertain to employees appointed in years where the required requirements or documents were minimal, and no evidence was required or maintained in the personnel file. Related to the academic preparation contained in the personnel files, they are documents required by the Recruitment and Selection Section and these respond to the minimum requirements and alternatives of the class, according to the Agency's Classification Plan. Each class specification sets minimum requirements for the position the candidate will hold. On the other hand, when the previously known Administration of Health Services Facilities (AFASS) closed in 1999, its employees went to the Department of Health with the file they had, whose procedures and processes were not uniform to those of our Agency. The Regions and Hospitals have delegated the verification of documents, to work on appointments and other personnel transactions, such as job reclassifications, promotions and others. This delegation brings the process of standardizing and authorizing DSP-29 by the Recruitment and Selection Section, to ensure that it is complied with as established in the Classification Plan. The agency is in the process of updating these documents as long as a change in the employee's job classification is applied. These are transactions that allow us to update the employees’ record to the new class they will occupy. In the case of Doping Test results, we mention that these are found in the Medical Record of each employee. By HIPPA law, these are not filed in the personnel file. Of the aspects pointed out in the audit, the Department of Health has developed greater review and audit measures by the analysts of our agency, before the defunct Quality Control Section, who watched over and audited the personnel files of the Regions, providing control and compliance with the documents required according to the Regulations and Standards that govern the Office of Human Resources and Labor Relations. The Office of Human Resources presented a work plan to implement an effective and efficient personnel file review procedure to comply with and improve the agency's personnel processes and transactions. Responsible Officials Lcdo. Luis Rivera Villanueva Sec. Auxiliar de Recursos Humanos 787-765-2929 ext. 4273 Mrs. Luz S. Ramos Pedroza Specialist 787-765-2929 ext. 4273 Mrs. Maribel Zayas Payroll Officer Director 787-765-2929 ext. 4209 Estimated Completion Date Implementation is expected to be completed on or before the end of the fiscal year June 30, 2024.
Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 establish that the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. 2 CFR 200.430 establishes that the cost of compensation for personnel services is allowable to the extent that it follows an appointment made in accordance with the governmental unit's laws and rules and meets the merit system or other requirements required by federal law, where applicable. Compensation for personal services may also include fringe benefits which are addressed in §200.431 Compensation—fringe benefits. Costs of compensation are allowable to the extent that they satisfy the specific requirements of this part, and that the total compensation for individual employees: (1) Is reasonable for the services rendered and conforms to the established written policy of the non-Federal entity consistently applied to both Federal and non-Federal activities; (2) Follows an appointment made in accordance with a non-Federal entity's laws and/or rules or written policies and meets the requirements of Federal statute, where applicable; and (3) Is determined and supported as provided in paragraph (i) of this section, Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses, when applicable. (i) The Non-Federal entity establishes consistent written policies which apply uniformly to all faculty members, not just those working on Federal awards. Condition a. During our audit, on a sample of sixty (60) personnel files, we observed that the personnel files are not being kept current and in some instances were incomplete. b. One personnel file of federal funds was not provided for our evaluation. c. The PRDH does not have established written policies and manuals which can define standard internal controls for each program and / or region of the entity. Cause PRDH has not established an effective internal control designed to ensure the accuracy and completeness of the employee files. Also, the incompleteness of the files may depend of the time that the employee started working in the agency. Effect Due to law and regulation changes, incomplete files may result in inadequate documentation to support compliance with the criteria over management and administration of personnel files. Also, in the case of employees paid with federal funds, it may result in cost disallowances for personnel that do not meet the requirements to be employed by the corresponding federal program. Questioned Costs None Perspective Information Finding does not represent a significant problem. The Department has addressed this finding and it’s been taking the steps necessary to reduce incidences to a minimum. We selected 60 employee files from all agency. Prior Year Audit Finding 2021-002 Recommendation PRDH should immediately undertake a process to review all personnel files and validate that the minimum requirement documents are appropriately completed and included in each personnel file. Also, the PRDH must update the salary change form in file in order to reflect current salary as stated in the digital information system. Views of Responsible Officials During the month of August, the Office of Human Resources and Labor Relations was audited by the ADA. It is to this that we respond to the findings indicated in the audit, as follows: Over the past few years we have developed an internal control, using a document entitled Check sheet, which contains the list of documents required for the appointment of employees and another for the audit of files. It contains three columns for the collation of documents required by the Analysts of the Appointments and Changes Section and ends with the collation of the Division Supervisor, before being referred to the Personnel Officers of our regions. This document has been modified according to needs, changes, procedures and new regulations. It is important to mention that many of our audited personnel records pertain to employees appointed in years where the required requirements or documents were minimal, and no evidence was required or maintained in the personnel file. Related to the academic preparation contained in the personnel files, they are documents required by the Recruitment and Selection Section and these respond to the minimum requirements and alternatives of the class, according to the Agency's Classification Plan. Each class specification sets minimum requirements for the position the candidate will hold. On the other hand, when the previously known Administration of Health Services Facilities (AFASS) closed in 1999, its employees went to the Department of Health with the file they had, whose procedures and processes were not uniform to those of our Agency. The Regions and Hospitals have delegated the verification of documents, to work on appointments and other personnel transactions, such as job reclassifications, promotions and others. This delegation brings the process of standardizing and authorizing DSP-29 by the Recruitment and Selection Section, to ensure that it is complied with as established in the Classification Plan. The agency is in the process of updating these documents as long as a change in the employee's job classification is applied. These are transactions that allow us to update the employees’ record to the new class they will occupy. In the case of Doping Test results, we mention that these are found in the Medical Record of each employee. By HIPPA law, these are not filed in the personnel file. Of the aspects pointed out in the audit, the Department of Health has developed greater review and audit measures by the analysts of our agency, before the defunct Quality Control Section, who watched over and audited the personnel files of the Regions, providing control and compliance with the documents required according to the Regulations and Standards that govern the Office of Human Resources and Labor Relations. The Office of Human Resources presented a work plan to implement an effective and efficient personnel file review procedure to comply with and improve the agency's personnel processes and transactions. Responsible Officials Lcdo. Luis Rivera Villanueva Sec. Auxiliar de Recursos Humanos 787-765-2929 ext. 4273 Mrs. Luz S. Ramos Pedroza Specialist 787-765-2929 ext. 4273 Mrs. Maribel Zayas Payroll Officer Director 787-765-2929 ext. 4209 Estimated Completion Date Implementation is expected to be completed on or before the end of the fiscal year June 30, 2024.
Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 establish that the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. 2 CFR 200.430 establishes that the cost of compensation for personnel services is allowable to the extent that it follows an appointment made in accordance with the governmental unit's laws and rules and meets the merit system or other requirements required by federal law, where applicable. Compensation for personal services may also include fringe benefits which are addressed in §200.431 Compensation—fringe benefits. Costs of compensation are allowable to the extent that they satisfy the specific requirements of this part, and that the total compensation for individual employees: (1) Is reasonable for the services rendered and conforms to the established written policy of the non-Federal entity consistently applied to both Federal and non-Federal activities; (2) Follows an appointment made in accordance with a non-Federal entity's laws and/or rules or written policies and meets the requirements of Federal statute, where applicable; and (3) Is determined and supported as provided in paragraph (i) of this section, Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses, when applicable. (i) The Non-Federal entity establishes consistent written policies which apply uniformly to all faculty members, not just those working on Federal awards. Condition a. During our audit, on a sample of sixty (60) personnel files, we observed that the personnel files are not being kept current and in some instances were incomplete. b. One personnel file of federal funds was not provided for our evaluation. c. The PRDH does not have established written policies and manuals which can define standard internal controls for each program and / or region of the entity. Cause PRDH has not established an effective internal control designed to ensure the accuracy and completeness of the employee files. Also, the incompleteness of the files may depend of the time that the employee started working in the agency. Effect Due to law and regulation changes, incomplete files may result in inadequate documentation to support compliance with the criteria over management and administration of personnel files. Also, in the case of employees paid with federal funds, it may result in cost disallowances for personnel that do not meet the requirements to be employed by the corresponding federal program. Questioned Costs None Perspective Information Finding does not represent a significant problem. The Department has addressed this finding and it’s been taking the steps necessary to reduce incidences to a minimum. We selected 60 employee files from all agency. Prior Year Audit Finding 2021-002 Recommendation PRDH should immediately undertake a process to review all personnel files and validate that the minimum requirement documents are appropriately completed and included in each personnel file. Also, the PRDH must update the salary change form in file in order to reflect current salary as stated in the digital information system. Views of Responsible Officials During the month of August, the Office of Human Resources and Labor Relations was audited by the ADA. It is to this that we respond to the findings indicated in the audit, as follows: Over the past few years we have developed an internal control, using a document entitled Check sheet, which contains the list of documents required for the appointment of employees and another for the audit of files. It contains three columns for the collation of documents required by the Analysts of the Appointments and Changes Section and ends with the collation of the Division Supervisor, before being referred to the Personnel Officers of our regions. This document has been modified according to needs, changes, procedures and new regulations. It is important to mention that many of our audited personnel records pertain to employees appointed in years where the required requirements or documents were minimal, and no evidence was required or maintained in the personnel file. Related to the academic preparation contained in the personnel files, they are documents required by the Recruitment and Selection Section and these respond to the minimum requirements and alternatives of the class, according to the Agency's Classification Plan. Each class specification sets minimum requirements for the position the candidate will hold. On the other hand, when the previously known Administration of Health Services Facilities (AFASS) closed in 1999, its employees went to the Department of Health with the file they had, whose procedures and processes were not uniform to those of our Agency. The Regions and Hospitals have delegated the verification of documents, to work on appointments and other personnel transactions, such as job reclassifications, promotions and others. This delegation brings the process of standardizing and authorizing DSP-29 by the Recruitment and Selection Section, to ensure that it is complied with as established in the Classification Plan. The agency is in the process of updating these documents as long as a change in the employee's job classification is applied. These are transactions that allow us to update the employees’ record to the new class they will occupy. In the case of Doping Test results, we mention that these are found in the Medical Record of each employee. By HIPPA law, these are not filed in the personnel file. Of the aspects pointed out in the audit, the Department of Health has developed greater review and audit measures by the analysts of our agency, before the defunct Quality Control Section, who watched over and audited the personnel files of the Regions, providing control and compliance with the documents required according to the Regulations and Standards that govern the Office of Human Resources and Labor Relations. The Office of Human Resources presented a work plan to implement an effective and efficient personnel file review procedure to comply with and improve the agency's personnel processes and transactions. Responsible Officials Lcdo. Luis Rivera Villanueva Sec. Auxiliar de Recursos Humanos 787-765-2929 ext. 4273 Mrs. Luz S. Ramos Pedroza Specialist 787-765-2929 ext. 4273 Mrs. Maribel Zayas Payroll Officer Director 787-765-2929 ext. 4209 Estimated Completion Date Implementation is expected to be completed on or before the end of the fiscal year June 30, 2024.
Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 establish that the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. 2 CFR 200.430 establishes that the cost of compensation for personnel services is allowable to the extent that it follows an appointment made in accordance with the governmental unit's laws and rules and meets the merit system or other requirements required by federal law, where applicable. Compensation for personal services may also include fringe benefits which are addressed in §200.431 Compensation—fringe benefits. Costs of compensation are allowable to the extent that they satisfy the specific requirements of this part, and that the total compensation for individual employees: (1) Is reasonable for the services rendered and conforms to the established written policy of the non-Federal entity consistently applied to both Federal and non-Federal activities; (2) Follows an appointment made in accordance with a non-Federal entity's laws and/or rules or written policies and meets the requirements of Federal statute, where applicable; and (3) Is determined and supported as provided in paragraph (i) of this section, Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses, when applicable. (i) The Non-Federal entity establishes consistent written policies which apply uniformly to all faculty members, not just those working on Federal awards. Condition a. During our audit, on a sample of sixty (60) personnel files, we observed that the personnel files are not being kept current and in some instances were incomplete. b. One personnel file of federal funds was not provided for our evaluation. c. The PRDH does not have established written policies and manuals which can define standard internal controls for each program and / or region of the entity. Cause PRDH has not established an effective internal control designed to ensure the accuracy and completeness of the employee files. Also, the incompleteness of the files may depend of the time that the employee started working in the agency. Effect Due to law and regulation changes, incomplete files may result in inadequate documentation to support compliance with the criteria over management and administration of personnel files. Also, in the case of employees paid with federal funds, it may result in cost disallowances for personnel that do not meet the requirements to be employed by the corresponding federal program. Questioned Costs None Perspective Information Finding does not represent a significant problem. The Department has addressed this finding and it’s been taking the steps necessary to reduce incidences to a minimum. We selected 60 employee files from all agency. Prior Year Audit Finding 2021-002 Recommendation PRDH should immediately undertake a process to review all personnel files and validate that the minimum requirement documents are appropriately completed and included in each personnel file. Also, the PRDH must update the salary change form in file in order to reflect current salary as stated in the digital information system. Views of Responsible Officials During the month of August, the Office of Human Resources and Labor Relations was audited by the ADA. It is to this that we respond to the findings indicated in the audit, as follows: Over the past few years we have developed an internal control, using a document entitled Check sheet, which contains the list of documents required for the appointment of employees and another for the audit of files. It contains three columns for the collation of documents required by the Analysts of the Appointments and Changes Section and ends with the collation of the Division Supervisor, before being referred to the Personnel Officers of our regions. This document has been modified according to needs, changes, procedures and new regulations. It is important to mention that many of our audited personnel records pertain to employees appointed in years where the required requirements or documents were minimal, and no evidence was required or maintained in the personnel file. Related to the academic preparation contained in the personnel files, they are documents required by the Recruitment and Selection Section and these respond to the minimum requirements and alternatives of the class, according to the Agency's Classification Plan. Each class specification sets minimum requirements for the position the candidate will hold. On the other hand, when the previously known Administration of Health Services Facilities (AFASS) closed in 1999, its employees went to the Department of Health with the file they had, whose procedures and processes were not uniform to those of our Agency. The Regions and Hospitals have delegated the verification of documents, to work on appointments and other personnel transactions, such as job reclassifications, promotions and others. This delegation brings the process of standardizing and authorizing DSP-29 by the Recruitment and Selection Section, to ensure that it is complied with as established in the Classification Plan. The agency is in the process of updating these documents as long as a change in the employee's job classification is applied. These are transactions that allow us to update the employees’ record to the new class they will occupy. In the case of Doping Test results, we mention that these are found in the Medical Record of each employee. By HIPPA law, these are not filed in the personnel file. Of the aspects pointed out in the audit, the Department of Health has developed greater review and audit measures by the analysts of our agency, before the defunct Quality Control Section, who watched over and audited the personnel files of the Regions, providing control and compliance with the documents required according to the Regulations and Standards that govern the Office of Human Resources and Labor Relations. The Office of Human Resources presented a work plan to implement an effective and efficient personnel file review procedure to comply with and improve the agency's personnel processes and transactions. Responsible Officials Lcdo. Luis Rivera Villanueva Sec. Auxiliar de Recursos Humanos 787-765-2929 ext. 4273 Mrs. Luz S. Ramos Pedroza Specialist 787-765-2929 ext. 4273 Mrs. Maribel Zayas Payroll Officer Director 787-765-2929 ext. 4209 Estimated Completion Date Implementation is expected to be completed on or before the end of the fiscal year June 30, 2024.
Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 establish that the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. 2 CFR 200.430 establishes that the cost of compensation for personnel services is allowable to the extent that it follows an appointment made in accordance with the governmental unit's laws and rules and meets the merit system or other requirements required by federal law, where applicable. Compensation for personal services may also include fringe benefits which are addressed in §200.431 Compensation—fringe benefits. Costs of compensation are allowable to the extent that they satisfy the specific requirements of this part, and that the total compensation for individual employees: (1) Is reasonable for the services rendered and conforms to the established written policy of the non-Federal entity consistently applied to both Federal and non-Federal activities; (2) Follows an appointment made in accordance with a non-Federal entity's laws and/or rules or written policies and meets the requirements of Federal statute, where applicable; and (3) Is determined and supported as provided in paragraph (i) of this section, Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses, when applicable. (i) The Non-Federal entity establishes consistent written policies which apply uniformly to all faculty members, not just those working on Federal awards. Condition a. During our audit, on a sample of sixty (60) personnel files, we observed that the personnel files are not being kept current and in some instances were incomplete. b. One personnel file of federal funds was not provided for our evaluation. c. The PRDH does not have established written policies and manuals which can define standard internal controls for each program and / or region of the entity. Cause PRDH has not established an effective internal control designed to ensure the accuracy and completeness of the employee files. Also, the incompleteness of the files may depend of the time that the employee started working in the agency. Effect Due to law and regulation changes, incomplete files may result in inadequate documentation to support compliance with the criteria over management and administration of personnel files. Also, in the case of employees paid with federal funds, it may result in cost disallowances for personnel that do not meet the requirements to be employed by the corresponding federal program. Questioned Costs None Perspective Information Finding does not represent a significant problem. The Department has addressed this finding and it’s been taking the steps necessary to reduce incidences to a minimum. We selected 60 employee files from all agency. Prior Year Audit Finding 2021-002 Recommendation PRDH should immediately undertake a process to review all personnel files and validate that the minimum requirement documents are appropriately completed and included in each personnel file. Also, the PRDH must update the salary change form in file in order to reflect current salary as stated in the digital information system. Views of Responsible Officials During the month of August, the Office of Human Resources and Labor Relations was audited by the ADA. It is to this that we respond to the findings indicated in the audit, as follows: Over the past few years we have developed an internal control, using a document entitled Check sheet, which contains the list of documents required for the appointment of employees and another for the audit of files. It contains three columns for the collation of documents required by the Analysts of the Appointments and Changes Section and ends with the collation of the Division Supervisor, before being referred to the Personnel Officers of our regions. This document has been modified according to needs, changes, procedures and new regulations. It is important to mention that many of our audited personnel records pertain to employees appointed in years where the required requirements or documents were minimal, and no evidence was required or maintained in the personnel file. Related to the academic preparation contained in the personnel files, they are documents required by the Recruitment and Selection Section and these respond to the minimum requirements and alternatives of the class, according to the Agency's Classification Plan. Each class specification sets minimum requirements for the position the candidate will hold. On the other hand, when the previously known Administration of Health Services Facilities (AFASS) closed in 1999, its employees went to the Department of Health with the file they had, whose procedures and processes were not uniform to those of our Agency. The Regions and Hospitals have delegated the verification of documents, to work on appointments and other personnel transactions, such as job reclassifications, promotions and others. This delegation brings the process of standardizing and authorizing DSP-29 by the Recruitment and Selection Section, to ensure that it is complied with as established in the Classification Plan. The agency is in the process of updating these documents as long as a change in the employee's job classification is applied. These are transactions that allow us to update the employees’ record to the new class they will occupy. In the case of Doping Test results, we mention that these are found in the Medical Record of each employee. By HIPPA law, these are not filed in the personnel file. Of the aspects pointed out in the audit, the Department of Health has developed greater review and audit measures by the analysts of our agency, before the defunct Quality Control Section, who watched over and audited the personnel files of the Regions, providing control and compliance with the documents required according to the Regulations and Standards that govern the Office of Human Resources and Labor Relations. The Office of Human Resources presented a work plan to implement an effective and efficient personnel file review procedure to comply with and improve the agency's personnel processes and transactions. Responsible Officials Lcdo. Luis Rivera Villanueva Sec. Auxiliar de Recursos Humanos 787-765-2929 ext. 4273 Mrs. Luz S. Ramos Pedroza Specialist 787-765-2929 ext. 4273 Mrs. Maribel Zayas Payroll Officer Director 787-765-2929 ext. 4209 Estimated Completion Date Implementation is expected to be completed on or before the end of the fiscal year June 30, 2024.