2024-007 Lack of Semi-Annual Certifications for Special Education Personnel Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance New or Repeat Finding: New Federal Program: Special Education Cluster (ALNs 84.027, 84.173) Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-through Entity(ies): Texas Education Agency (246600010849086600, 246610010849086610, 66002406, 225350020849025000, 225360020849025360), Region 10 Education Service Center (236600497110001) Compliance Requirement: B - Allowable Costs / Costs Principles Criteria: Under 2 CFR 200.430(g), when employees work solely on a single federal award or cost objective, charges for their salaries must be supported by a system of internal control that provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. One allowable method is through completion of semi-annual certifications signed by the employee or a supervisory official with firsthand knowledge. These certifications provide assurance that salary costs charged to the federal program reflects the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the District, not exceeding 100% of compensated activities. Condition: The district did not maintain required semi-annual certifications for employees who worked solely on the Special Education Cluster (IDEA) programs. These certifications, which confirm that the employee worked 100% on the program for the period covered, were missing for all employees. Cause: The district did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure the forms were prepared, signed, and retained in accordance with federal requirements. Staff turnover and limited awareness of the documentation rules contributed to the oversight. Effect or Potential Effect: Without semi-annual certifications, the district lacks required documentation to fully support salary costs charged to the Special Education Cluster. This raises the risk that unallowable or unsupported personnel costs were charged to the program, even if employees were appropriately assigned. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs were identified, as auditors were able to verify through alternative procedures that employees worked solely on the program. The personnel records of the employees sampled contained approval of the employee to be hired into the appropriate job duties to be funded by special education cluster grant funds. Context: The district was unable to provide required semi-annual certifications for 14 out of 14 employees selected in our sample for testing. Recommendation: We recommend that the district develop and implement written procedures to ensure that semiannual certifications are prepared, signed, and retained for all employees working solely on federal programs. The district should provide training to finance and program staff to ensure continued compliance with federal documentation requirements. Views of Responsible Officials: District officials agree with the finding. The District has implemented new procedures in fiscal year 2025 to ensure semi-annual certifications are completed appropriately.
2024-007 Lack of Semi-Annual Certifications for Special Education Personnel Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance New or Repeat Finding: New Federal Program: Special Education Cluster (ALNs 84.027, 84.173) Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-through Entity(ies): Texas Education Agency (246600010849086600, 246610010849086610, 66002406, 225350020849025000, 225360020849025360), Region 10 Education Service Center (236600497110001) Compliance Requirement: B - Allowable Costs / Costs Principles Criteria: Under 2 CFR 200.430(g), when employees work solely on a single federal award or cost objective, charges for their salaries must be supported by a system of internal control that provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. One allowable method is through completion of semi-annual certifications signed by the employee or a supervisory official with firsthand knowledge. These certifications provide assurance that salary costs charged to the federal program reflects the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the District, not exceeding 100% of compensated activities. Condition: The district did not maintain required semi-annual certifications for employees who worked solely on the Special Education Cluster (IDEA) programs. These certifications, which confirm that the employee worked 100% on the program for the period covered, were missing for all employees. Cause: The district did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure the forms were prepared, signed, and retained in accordance with federal requirements. Staff turnover and limited awareness of the documentation rules contributed to the oversight. Effect or Potential Effect: Without semi-annual certifications, the district lacks required documentation to fully support salary costs charged to the Special Education Cluster. This raises the risk that unallowable or unsupported personnel costs were charged to the program, even if employees were appropriately assigned. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs were identified, as auditors were able to verify through alternative procedures that employees worked solely on the program. The personnel records of the employees sampled contained approval of the employee to be hired into the appropriate job duties to be funded by special education cluster grant funds. Context: The district was unable to provide required semi-annual certifications for 14 out of 14 employees selected in our sample for testing. Recommendation: We recommend that the district develop and implement written procedures to ensure that semiannual certifications are prepared, signed, and retained for all employees working solely on federal programs. The district should provide training to finance and program staff to ensure continued compliance with federal documentation requirements. Views of Responsible Officials: District officials agree with the finding. The District has implemented new procedures in fiscal year 2025 to ensure semi-annual certifications are completed appropriately.
2024-007 Lack of Semi-Annual Certifications for Special Education Personnel Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance New or Repeat Finding: New Federal Program: Special Education Cluster (ALNs 84.027, 84.173) Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-through Entity(ies): Texas Education Agency (246600010849086600, 246610010849086610, 66002406, 225350020849025000, 225360020849025360), Region 10 Education Service Center (236600497110001) Compliance Requirement: B - Allowable Costs / Costs Principles Criteria: Under 2 CFR 200.430(g), when employees work solely on a single federal award or cost objective, charges for their salaries must be supported by a system of internal control that provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. One allowable method is through completion of semi-annual certifications signed by the employee or a supervisory official with firsthand knowledge. These certifications provide assurance that salary costs charged to the federal program reflects the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the District, not exceeding 100% of compensated activities. Condition: The district did not maintain required semi-annual certifications for employees who worked solely on the Special Education Cluster (IDEA) programs. These certifications, which confirm that the employee worked 100% on the program for the period covered, were missing for all employees. Cause: The district did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure the forms were prepared, signed, and retained in accordance with federal requirements. Staff turnover and limited awareness of the documentation rules contributed to the oversight. Effect or Potential Effect: Without semi-annual certifications, the district lacks required documentation to fully support salary costs charged to the Special Education Cluster. This raises the risk that unallowable or unsupported personnel costs were charged to the program, even if employees were appropriately assigned. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs were identified, as auditors were able to verify through alternative procedures that employees worked solely on the program. The personnel records of the employees sampled contained approval of the employee to be hired into the appropriate job duties to be funded by special education cluster grant funds. Context: The district was unable to provide required semi-annual certifications for 14 out of 14 employees selected in our sample for testing. Recommendation: We recommend that the district develop and implement written procedures to ensure that semiannual certifications are prepared, signed, and retained for all employees working solely on federal programs. The district should provide training to finance and program staff to ensure continued compliance with federal documentation requirements. Views of Responsible Officials: District officials agree with the finding. The District has implemented new procedures in fiscal year 2025 to ensure semi-annual certifications are completed appropriately.
2024-007 Lack of Semi-Annual Certifications for Special Education Personnel Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance New or Repeat Finding: New Federal Program: Special Education Cluster (ALNs 84.027, 84.173) Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-through Entity(ies): Texas Education Agency (246600010849086600, 246610010849086610, 66002406, 225350020849025000, 225360020849025360), Region 10 Education Service Center (236600497110001) Compliance Requirement: B - Allowable Costs / Costs Principles Criteria: Under 2 CFR 200.430(g), when employees work solely on a single federal award or cost objective, charges for their salaries must be supported by a system of internal control that provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. One allowable method is through completion of semi-annual certifications signed by the employee or a supervisory official with firsthand knowledge. These certifications provide assurance that salary costs charged to the federal program reflects the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the District, not exceeding 100% of compensated activities. Condition: The district did not maintain required semi-annual certifications for employees who worked solely on the Special Education Cluster (IDEA) programs. These certifications, which confirm that the employee worked 100% on the program for the period covered, were missing for all employees. Cause: The district did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure the forms were prepared, signed, and retained in accordance with federal requirements. Staff turnover and limited awareness of the documentation rules contributed to the oversight. Effect or Potential Effect: Without semi-annual certifications, the district lacks required documentation to fully support salary costs charged to the Special Education Cluster. This raises the risk that unallowable or unsupported personnel costs were charged to the program, even if employees were appropriately assigned. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs were identified, as auditors were able to verify through alternative procedures that employees worked solely on the program. The personnel records of the employees sampled contained approval of the employee to be hired into the appropriate job duties to be funded by special education cluster grant funds. Context: The district was unable to provide required semi-annual certifications for 14 out of 14 employees selected in our sample for testing. Recommendation: We recommend that the district develop and implement written procedures to ensure that semiannual certifications are prepared, signed, and retained for all employees working solely on federal programs. The district should provide training to finance and program staff to ensure continued compliance with federal documentation requirements. Views of Responsible Officials: District officials agree with the finding. The District has implemented new procedures in fiscal year 2025 to ensure semi-annual certifications are completed appropriately.
2024-007 Lack of Semi-Annual Certifications for Special Education Personnel Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance New or Repeat Finding: New Federal Program: Special Education Cluster (ALNs 84.027, 84.173) Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-through Entity(ies): Texas Education Agency (246600010849086600, 246610010849086610, 66002406, 225350020849025000, 225360020849025360), Region 10 Education Service Center (236600497110001) Compliance Requirement: B - Allowable Costs / Costs Principles Criteria: Under 2 CFR 200.430(g), when employees work solely on a single federal award or cost objective, charges for their salaries must be supported by a system of internal control that provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. One allowable method is through completion of semi-annual certifications signed by the employee or a supervisory official with firsthand knowledge. These certifications provide assurance that salary costs charged to the federal program reflects the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the District, not exceeding 100% of compensated activities. Condition: The district did not maintain required semi-annual certifications for employees who worked solely on the Special Education Cluster (IDEA) programs. These certifications, which confirm that the employee worked 100% on the program for the period covered, were missing for all employees. Cause: The district did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure the forms were prepared, signed, and retained in accordance with federal requirements. Staff turnover and limited awareness of the documentation rules contributed to the oversight. Effect or Potential Effect: Without semi-annual certifications, the district lacks required documentation to fully support salary costs charged to the Special Education Cluster. This raises the risk that unallowable or unsupported personnel costs were charged to the program, even if employees were appropriately assigned. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs were identified, as auditors were able to verify through alternative procedures that employees worked solely on the program. The personnel records of the employees sampled contained approval of the employee to be hired into the appropriate job duties to be funded by special education cluster grant funds. Context: The district was unable to provide required semi-annual certifications for 14 out of 14 employees selected in our sample for testing. Recommendation: We recommend that the district develop and implement written procedures to ensure that semiannual certifications are prepared, signed, and retained for all employees working solely on federal programs. The district should provide training to finance and program staff to ensure continued compliance with federal documentation requirements. Views of Responsible Officials: District officials agree with the finding. The District has implemented new procedures in fiscal year 2025 to ensure semi-annual certifications are completed appropriately.
PROGRAM DESCRIPTION Reference Number: 2024-004 Proper review of payroll charges to grant funds ALN 84.425U & 84.425W COVID-19 Education Stabilization Fund Pass through identifying number: 21528001245902 Award Year: 2023-2024 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Passed through State Department of Education Criteria: Non-federal entities are required to establish and maintain effective internal controls over compliance in accordance with 2 CFR 200.303(a) and 2 CFR 200.430(g) which requires that compensation charged to federal awards must be supported by a system of internal control that provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated, of which documentation must be incorporated into the official records of the entity. Condition Found: During our review of payroll charges that were funded through ESSER funds, it was noted that the District did not have adequate controls in place to monitor the payroll transactions charged to the program. Cause: Although the District implemented Skyward in the prior year, the District did not integrate the appropriate approvals into the system in a timely manner. In addition, turnover in the District Chief Financial Officer position caused difficulties in the District obtaining the proper approvals for journal entries. Effect: The District could fail to appropriately support expenditures charged to the program. Questioned Cost: $0 Recommendation: We recommend the District to implement appropriate approvals in the Skyward accounting system to provide for better oversight of transactions. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the findings. See corrective action plan beginning on page 114.
PROGRAM DESCRIPTION Reference Number: 2024-004 Proper review of payroll charges to grant funds ALN 84.425U & 84.425W COVID-19 Education Stabilization Fund Pass through identifying number: 21528001245902 Award Year: 2023-2024 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Passed through State Department of Education Criteria: Non-federal entities are required to establish and maintain effective internal controls over compliance in accordance with 2 CFR 200.303(a) and 2 CFR 200.430(g) which requires that compensation charged to federal awards must be supported by a system of internal control that provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated, of which documentation must be incorporated into the official records of the entity. Condition Found: During our review of payroll charges that were funded through ESSER funds, it was noted that the District did not have adequate controls in place to monitor the payroll transactions charged to the program. Cause: Although the District implemented Skyward in the prior year, the District did not integrate the appropriate approvals into the system in a timely manner. In addition, turnover in the District Chief Financial Officer position caused difficulties in the District obtaining the proper approvals for journal entries. Effect: The District could fail to appropriately support expenditures charged to the program. Questioned Cost: $0 Recommendation: We recommend the District to implement appropriate approvals in the Skyward accounting system to provide for better oversight of transactions. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the findings. See corrective action plan beginning on page 114.
PROGRAM DESCRIPTION Reference Number: 2024-004 Proper review of payroll charges to grant funds ALN 84.425U & 84.425W COVID-19 Education Stabilization Fund Pass through identifying number: 21528001245902 Award Year: 2023-2024 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Passed through State Department of Education Criteria: Non-federal entities are required to establish and maintain effective internal controls over compliance in accordance with 2 CFR 200.303(a) and 2 CFR 200.430(g) which requires that compensation charged to federal awards must be supported by a system of internal control that provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated, of which documentation must be incorporated into the official records of the entity. Condition Found: During our review of payroll charges that were funded through ESSER funds, it was noted that the District did not have adequate controls in place to monitor the payroll transactions charged to the program. Cause: Although the District implemented Skyward in the prior year, the District did not integrate the appropriate approvals into the system in a timely manner. In addition, turnover in the District Chief Financial Officer position caused difficulties in the District obtaining the proper approvals for journal entries. Effect: The District could fail to appropriately support expenditures charged to the program. Questioned Cost: $0 Recommendation: We recommend the District to implement appropriate approvals in the Skyward accounting system to provide for better oversight of transactions. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the findings. See corrective action plan beginning on page 114.
PROGRAM DESCRIPTION Reference Number: 2024-004 Proper review of payroll charges to grant funds ALN 84.425U & 84.425W COVID-19 Education Stabilization Fund Pass through identifying number: 21528001245902 Award Year: 2023-2024 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Passed through State Department of Education Criteria: Non-federal entities are required to establish and maintain effective internal controls over compliance in accordance with 2 CFR 200.303(a) and 2 CFR 200.430(g) which requires that compensation charged to federal awards must be supported by a system of internal control that provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated, of which documentation must be incorporated into the official records of the entity. Condition Found: During our review of payroll charges that were funded through ESSER funds, it was noted that the District did not have adequate controls in place to monitor the payroll transactions charged to the program. Cause: Although the District implemented Skyward in the prior year, the District did not integrate the appropriate approvals into the system in a timely manner. In addition, turnover in the District Chief Financial Officer position caused difficulties in the District obtaining the proper approvals for journal entries. Effect: The District could fail to appropriately support expenditures charged to the program. Questioned Cost: $0 Recommendation: We recommend the District to implement appropriate approvals in the Skyward accounting system to provide for better oversight of transactions. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the findings. See corrective action plan beginning on page 114.
Allowable Costs/Activities Allowed – Personal Services Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program Title: Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases ALN: 93.323 Pass-Through Agency: N/A Pass-Through Number(s): N/A Award Number and Period: 6 NU50CK000501-01-08, 6 NU50CK000501-02-17 August 1, 2019 – July 31, 2024, August 1, 2019 – July 31, 2027 Statistically Valid Sample: No, and not intended to be a statistically valid sample. Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance and Noncompliance Criteria or specific requirement: Per 2 CFR section 200.303(a), the Texas Department of State Health Services (DSHS) must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that it is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Per 2 CFR 200.430 Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses, Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: (i) Be supported by an internal control system that ensures the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated; (ii) be incorporated into the official records of the non-Federal entity; (iii) reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non-Federal entity, not exceeding 100% of compensated activities; (iv) encompass federally-assisted and all other activities compensated by the non-Federal entity on an integrated basis, but may include the use of subsidiary records as defined in the non-Federal entity's written policy; (v) comply with the established accounting policies and practices of the non-Federal entity; (vi) support the distribution of the employee's salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and non-Federal award; an indirect cost activity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities which are allocated using different allocation bases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity. (vii) Budget estimates (meaning, estimates determined before the services are performed) alone do not qualify as support for charges to Federal awards, but may be used for interim accounting purposes, provided that: (A) The system for establishing the estimates produces reasonable approximations of the activity performed; (B) Significant changes in the related work activity (as defined by the recipient's or subrecipient's written policies) are promptly identified and entered into the records. Short-term (such as one or two months) fluctuations between workload categories do not need to be considered as long as the distribution of salaries and wages is reasonable over the longer term; and (C) The recipient's or subrecipient's system of internal controls includes processes to perform periodic after-the-fact reviews of interim charges made to a Federal award based on budget estimates. All necessary adjustments must be made so that the final amount charged to the Federal award is accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Condition: DSHS requires its employees to complete monthly time and leave reporting, regardless of whether the employee works solely on a single federal award or cost objective, or on multiple activities or cost objectives. Each employee has a default task profile based on their position in the agency that determines how their payroll and payroll-related dollars are allocated. Employees are instructed and given training on how to report any deviations from their profile as well as report any vacation time, sick time, leave of absence, etc. Employees are required to certify their time by the 10th of the month for the previous months’ time. Like all DSHS employees, supervisors are required to certify their time monthly. However, their time certification includes an additional affirmation which states the supervisor has performed the following: Reviewed the default task profile/labor account code for each of their direct reports. Reviewed the timesheets for all direct reports as compared to the default task profiles/labor account codes for accuracy of time worked and adjusted if necessary. For direct reports who have reported deviations, reviewed and verified the deviations reported and approved the respective timesheet. This documented affirmation provides sufficient documentation to indicate that the supervisors have reviewed after the fact interim payroll and payroll-related charges made to federal awards based on budget estimates. Audit procedures included a selection of 40 payroll-related expenditures incurred during the fiscal year totaling $191,809. For five of the 40 samples selected, the employee supervisor did not certify their monthly timesheet, and thus did not acknowledge neither the review of the employees’ default task profile/account labor code or their timesheets. Questioned costs: None. Context: See “Condition.” Cause: All five of the exceptions noted were directly reporting to the same supervisor. The monthly timesheets selected were during the months of July and August 2024. The supervisor was recently hired in April 2024 and was unaware of the requirement to certify monthly. Effect: Without the supervisor timesheet certification, there is a lack of sufficient documentation to indicate that they have reviewed after-the-fact interim payroll and payroll-related charges made to the federal awards based on budget estimates. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: DSHS should enhance new hire training policies and procedures to ensure all new hire trainings clearly address labor account codes, monthly time reporting, and task profiles. Views of responsible officials: DSHS has robust timekeeping controls but recognizes this opportunity to enhance training with reinforcement for new supervisors.
Allowable Costs/Activities Allowed – Personal Services Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program Title: Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases ALN: 93.323 Pass-Through Agency: N/A Pass-Through Number(s): N/A Award Number and Period: 6 NU50CK000501-01-08, 6 NU50CK000501-02-17 August 1, 2019 – July 31, 2024, August 1, 2019 – July 31, 2027 Statistically Valid Sample: No, and not intended to be a statistically valid sample. Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance and Noncompliance Criteria or specific requirement: Per 2 CFR section 200.303(a), the Texas Department of State Health Services (DSHS) must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that it is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Per 2 CFR 200.430 Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses, Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: (i) Be supported by an internal control system that ensures the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated; (ii) be incorporated into the official records of the non-Federal entity; (iii) reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non-Federal entity, not exceeding 100% of compensated activities; (iv) encompass federally-assisted and all other activities compensated by the non-Federal entity on an integrated basis, but may include the use of subsidiary records as defined in the non-Federal entity's written policy; (v) comply with the established accounting policies and practices of the non-Federal entity; (vi) support the distribution of the employee's salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and non-Federal award; an indirect cost activity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities which are allocated using different allocation bases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity. (vii) Budget estimates (meaning, estimates determined before the services are performed) alone do not qualify as support for charges to Federal awards, but may be used for interim accounting purposes, provided that: (A) The system for establishing the estimates produces reasonable approximations of the activity performed; (B) Significant changes in the related work activity (as defined by the recipient's or subrecipient's written policies) are promptly identified and entered into the records. Short-term (such as one or two months) fluctuations between workload categories do not need to be considered as long as the distribution of salaries and wages is reasonable over the longer term; and (C) The recipient's or subrecipient's system of internal controls includes processes to perform periodic after-the-fact reviews of interim charges made to a Federal award based on budget estimates. All necessary adjustments must be made so that the final amount charged to the Federal award is accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Condition: DSHS requires its employees to complete monthly time and leave reporting, regardless of whether the employee works solely on a single federal award or cost objective, or on multiple activities or cost objectives. Each employee has a default task profile based on their position in the agency that determines how their payroll and payroll-related dollars are allocated. Employees are instructed and given training on how to report any deviations from their profile as well as report any vacation time, sick time, leave of absence, etc. Employees are required to certify their time by the 10th of the month for the previous months’ time. Like all DSHS employees, supervisors are required to certify their time monthly. However, their time certification includes an additional affirmation which states the supervisor has performed the following: Reviewed the default task profile/labor account code for each of their direct reports. Reviewed the timesheets for all direct reports as compared to the default task profiles/labor account codes for accuracy of time worked and adjusted if necessary. For direct reports who have reported deviations, reviewed and verified the deviations reported and approved the respective timesheet. This documented affirmation provides sufficient documentation to indicate that the supervisors have reviewed after the fact interim payroll and payroll-related charges made to federal awards based on budget estimates. Audit procedures included a selection of 40 payroll-related expenditures incurred during the fiscal year totaling $191,809. For five of the 40 samples selected, the employee supervisor did not certify their monthly timesheet, and thus did not acknowledge neither the review of the employees’ default task profile/account labor code or their timesheets. Questioned costs: None. Context: See “Condition.” Cause: All five of the exceptions noted were directly reporting to the same supervisor. The monthly timesheets selected were during the months of July and August 2024. The supervisor was recently hired in April 2024 and was unaware of the requirement to certify monthly. Effect: Without the supervisor timesheet certification, there is a lack of sufficient documentation to indicate that they have reviewed after-the-fact interim payroll and payroll-related charges made to the federal awards based on budget estimates. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: DSHS should enhance new hire training policies and procedures to ensure all new hire trainings clearly address labor account codes, monthly time reporting, and task profiles. Views of responsible officials: DSHS has robust timekeeping controls but recognizes this opportunity to enhance training with reinforcement for new supervisors.
Activities Allowed and Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles – Personal Services Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Labor Federal Program Title: Employment Service Cluster ALN: 17.207, 17.801 Pass-Through Agency: N/A Pass-Through Number(s): N/A Award Number and Period: DV373362255548–01, 23555DV000036–01, 24555DV000076–01 October 1, 2021 – December 31, 2023, October 1, 2022 – December 31, 2024, October 1, 2023 – December 31, 2025 Statistically Valid Sample: No, and not intended to be a statistically valid sample Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance and Nonompliance Criteria or specific requirement: Per 2 CFR section 200.303(a), Texas Veterans Commission (TVC) must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) Per 2 CFR 200.430 Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses, Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: (i) Be supported by a system of internal control that provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated; (ii) Be incorporated into the official records of the recipient or subrecipient; (iii) Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the recipient or subrecipient, not exceeding 100 percent of compensated activities (iv) Encompass federally-assisted and all other activities compensated by the recipient or subrecipient on an integrated basis but may include the use of subsidiary records as defined in the recipient's or subrecipient's written policy; (v) Comply with the established accounting policies and procedures of the recipient or subrecipient (vi) Support the distribution of the employee's salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and non-Federal award; an indirect cost activity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities allocated using different allocation bases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity. (vii) Budget estimates (meaning, estimates determined before the services are performed) alone do not qualify as support for charges to Federal awards, but may be used for interim accounting purposes, provided that: (A) The system for establishing the estimates produces reasonable approximations of the activity performed; (B) Significant changes in the related work activity (as defined by the recipient's or subrecipient's written policies) are promptly identified and entered into the records. Short-term (such as one or two months) fluctuations between workload categories do not need to be considered as long as the distribution of salaries and wages is reasonable over the longer term; and (C) The recipient's or subrecipient's system of internal controls includes processes to perform periodic after-the-fact reviews of interim charges made to a Federal award based on budget estimates. All necessary adjustments must be made so that the final amount charged to the Federal award is accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Condition: Audit procedures included a sample of 40 expenditures for incurred for personnel services during the fiscal year to test whether the expenditures for salaries and wages were allowable and based on the records that accurately reflect the work performed. We noted that TVC prepares monthly budget reports that are reviewed by the program’s budget analyst and the respective program director or manager. Expenditures related to personnel services are recorded based on the budgeted amount for each individual. No periodic after-the-fact review is performed to verify that the final amount charged to the Federal award is accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Questioned costs: None Context: See “Condition.” Cause: The employees working on the federal grant program are budgeted to work on the grant 100% of their time. Management deemed this sufficient to substantiate the final amounts charged to the grant. Effect: Lack of a periodic after-the-fact review to verify that the final amounts charged to the Federal award are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated may result in noncompliance with grant terms and conditions and questioned costs. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that management establish procedures and internal controls to perform an after-the-fact review of personnel services to verify that the final amounts charged to the Federal award are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. This can be accomplished by a supervisor’s review and approval of the employee’s timesheet each pay period or an annual review where necessary adjustments are made. Views of responsible officials: TVC agrees to the recommendation of documenting review and approvals. To note, the monthly Veteran Employment Services (VES) Forecasts and Payroll reports had been reviewed with VES’s Director and/or Operations Manager as well as VES’s Annual State Plan before submission to the U.S. Department of Labor. VES’s Director or Operations Manager’s signature of approval was never documented for confirmation of review.
Activities Allowed and Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles – Personal Services Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Labor Federal Program Title: Employment Service Cluster ALN: 17.207, 17.801 Pass-Through Agency: N/A Pass-Through Number(s): N/A Award Number and Period: DV373362255548–01, 23555DV000036–01, 24555DV000076–01 October 1, 2021 – December 31, 2023, October 1, 2022 – December 31, 2024, October 1, 2023 – December 31, 2025 Statistically Valid Sample: No, and not intended to be a statistically valid sample Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance and Nonompliance Criteria or specific requirement: Per 2 CFR section 200.303(a), Texas Veterans Commission (TVC) must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) Per 2 CFR 200.430 Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses, Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: (i) Be supported by a system of internal control that provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated; (ii) Be incorporated into the official records of the recipient or subrecipient; (iii) Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the recipient or subrecipient, not exceeding 100 percent of compensated activities (iv) Encompass federally-assisted and all other activities compensated by the recipient or subrecipient on an integrated basis but may include the use of subsidiary records as defined in the recipient's or subrecipient's written policy; (v) Comply with the established accounting policies and procedures of the recipient or subrecipient (vi) Support the distribution of the employee's salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and non-Federal award; an indirect cost activity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities allocated using different allocation bases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity. (vii) Budget estimates (meaning, estimates determined before the services are performed) alone do not qualify as support for charges to Federal awards, but may be used for interim accounting purposes, provided that: (A) The system for establishing the estimates produces reasonable approximations of the activity performed; (B) Significant changes in the related work activity (as defined by the recipient's or subrecipient's written policies) are promptly identified and entered into the records. Short-term (such as one or two months) fluctuations between workload categories do not need to be considered as long as the distribution of salaries and wages is reasonable over the longer term; and (C) The recipient's or subrecipient's system of internal controls includes processes to perform periodic after-the-fact reviews of interim charges made to a Federal award based on budget estimates. All necessary adjustments must be made so that the final amount charged to the Federal award is accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Condition: Audit procedures included a sample of 40 expenditures for incurred for personnel services during the fiscal year to test whether the expenditures for salaries and wages were allowable and based on the records that accurately reflect the work performed. We noted that TVC prepares monthly budget reports that are reviewed by the program’s budget analyst and the respective program director or manager. Expenditures related to personnel services are recorded based on the budgeted amount for each individual. No periodic after-the-fact review is performed to verify that the final amount charged to the Federal award is accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Questioned costs: None Context: See “Condition.” Cause: The employees working on the federal grant program are budgeted to work on the grant 100% of their time. Management deemed this sufficient to substantiate the final amounts charged to the grant. Effect: Lack of a periodic after-the-fact review to verify that the final amounts charged to the Federal award are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated may result in noncompliance with grant terms and conditions and questioned costs. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that management establish procedures and internal controls to perform an after-the-fact review of personnel services to verify that the final amounts charged to the Federal award are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. This can be accomplished by a supervisor’s review and approval of the employee’s timesheet each pay period or an annual review where necessary adjustments are made. Views of responsible officials: TVC agrees to the recommendation of documenting review and approvals. To note, the monthly Veteran Employment Services (VES) Forecasts and Payroll reports had been reviewed with VES’s Director and/or Operations Manager as well as VES’s Annual State Plan before submission to the U.S. Department of Labor. VES’s Director or Operations Manager’s signature of approval was never documented for confirmation of review.
Section 2 - Federal and State Award Findings and Questioned Costs Significant Deficiency 2024-001 Payroll costs were allocated to incorrect programs Prevention and Treatment of Substance Abuse, CFDA #93.959, Pass-Through Grant #HHS000539700192 Criteria: In accordance with Uniform Guidance (2 CFR § 200.430g), payroll costs must be charged accurately to federal awards and should be supported by records that appropriately reflect the work performed. Condition: Payroll costs reported for the associated programs under pass-through grant #HHS000539700192 totaling approximately $30,242 were erroneously charged to the incorrect program. Cause: The issue was caused by coding errors in the accounting system during payroll processing. The responsible personnel mistakenly allocated the employees' hours to incorrect program codes for certain employees and pay periods without adequate review and reconciliation to the source timesheets. Effect: Payroll costs for the individual programs under CFDA #93.959, Pass-Through Grant #HHS000539700192 were overstated in total by approximately $30,242. Questioned Costs: Approximately $30,242 Context: The finding was isolated to payroll costs and for only certain employees and pay periods, and no findings were identified related to other non-personnel direct or indirect costs or other compliance requirements. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization strengthen internal controls over payroll cost allocations, including adding an additional layer of review over payroll and ensuring the payroll data in the accounting system is properly reconciled to the employees' timesheets each pay period. Additionally, as possible, we recommend configuring validation controls in the accounting system to help prevent employees from being charged to incorrect program codes. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrections Actions: Management agrees with the audit finding and a response is included in the corrective action plan.
Health Center Program Cluster AL No. 93.224 and 93.527 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Award No. H80CS00438, H8FCS40427, H8GCS47600 Healthy Start Initiative AL No. 93.926 Us. Department of Health and Human Services Award No. H49MC00156 Criteria: Under 2 CFR 200.430, payroll expenses must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed and supported by a system of internal control that provides reasonable assurance that charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Condition: During the testing performed, it was noted that the Organization transferred payroll costs between programs, however, no time and effort certification or equivalent documentation was updated to reflect the changes. Additionally, the transfer of payroll costs between grants was not properly reflected within the accounting system records by grant. These transfers between grants were completed after the end of the fiscal year. Cause: During the year the Organization had new grants, but the payroll system was not updated to reflect the changes. Effect: Allocation of payroll costs to the federal award program may be inaccurate or not properly documented. Questioned costs: n/a Context: The Organization did not maintain supporting documentation for payroll costs that were reallocated to a new grant. These costs were reallocated from the Health Center Program and from the Healthy Start Initiative funding to the new award. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: The Organization should review and update the policies and procedures regarding payroll costs. Additionally, the Organization should provide training to staff on grant tracking and documentation. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with this finding. Staff will be trained to ensure future changes in payroll costs are updated timely within the system and documentation maintained.
Health Center Program Cluster AL No. 93.224 and 93.527 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Award No. H80CS00438, H8FCS40427, H8GCS47600 Healthy Start Initiative AL No. 93.926 Us. Department of Health and Human Services Award No. H49MC00156 Criteria: Under 2 CFR 200.430, payroll expenses must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed and supported by a system of internal control that provides reasonable assurance that charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Condition: During the testing performed, it was noted that the Organization transferred payroll costs between programs, however, no time and effort certification or equivalent documentation was updated to reflect the changes. Additionally, the transfer of payroll costs between grants was not properly reflected within the accounting system records by grant. These transfers between grants were completed after the end of the fiscal year. Cause: During the year the Organization had new grants, but the payroll system was not updated to reflect the changes. Effect: Allocation of payroll costs to the federal award program may be inaccurate or not properly documented. Questioned costs: n/a Context: The Organization did not maintain supporting documentation for payroll costs that were reallocated to a new grant. These costs were reallocated from the Health Center Program and from the Healthy Start Initiative funding to the new award. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: The Organization should review and update the policies and procedures regarding payroll costs. Additionally, the Organization should provide training to staff on grant tracking and documentation. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with this finding. Staff will be trained to ensure future changes in payroll costs are updated timely within the system and documentation maintained.
Health Center Program Cluster AL No. 93.224 and 93.527 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Award No. H80CS00438, H8FCS40427, H8GCS47600 Healthy Start Initiative AL No. 93.926 Us. Department of Health and Human Services Award No. H49MC00156 Criteria: Under 2 CFR 200.430, payroll expenses must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed and supported by a system of internal control that provides reasonable assurance that charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Condition: During the testing performed, it was noted that the Organization transferred payroll costs between programs, however, no time and effort certification or equivalent documentation was updated to reflect the changes. Additionally, the transfer of payroll costs between grants was not properly reflected within the accounting system records by grant. These transfers between grants were completed after the end of the fiscal year. Cause: During the year the Organization had new grants, but the payroll system was not updated to reflect the changes. Effect: Allocation of payroll costs to the federal award program may be inaccurate or not properly documented. Questioned costs: n/a Context: The Organization did not maintain supporting documentation for payroll costs that were reallocated to a new grant. These costs were reallocated from the Health Center Program and from the Healthy Start Initiative funding to the new award. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: The Organization should review and update the policies and procedures regarding payroll costs. Additionally, the Organization should provide training to staff on grant tracking and documentation. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with this finding. Staff will be trained to ensure future changes in payroll costs are updated timely within the system and documentation maintained.
Health Center Program Cluster AL No. 93.224 and 93.527 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Award No. H80CS00438, H8FCS40427, H8GCS47600 Healthy Start Initiative AL No. 93.926 Us. Department of Health and Human Services Award No. H49MC00156 Criteria: Under 2 CFR 200.430, payroll expenses must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed and supported by a system of internal control that provides reasonable assurance that charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Condition: During the testing performed, it was noted that the Organization transferred payroll costs between programs, however, no time and effort certification or equivalent documentation was updated to reflect the changes. Additionally, the transfer of payroll costs between grants was not properly reflected within the accounting system records by grant. These transfers between grants were completed after the end of the fiscal year. Cause: During the year the Organization had new grants, but the payroll system was not updated to reflect the changes. Effect: Allocation of payroll costs to the federal award program may be inaccurate or not properly documented. Questioned costs: n/a Context: The Organization did not maintain supporting documentation for payroll costs that were reallocated to a new grant. These costs were reallocated from the Health Center Program and from the Healthy Start Initiative funding to the new award. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: The Organization should review and update the policies and procedures regarding payroll costs. Additionally, the Organization should provide training to staff on grant tracking and documentation. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with this finding. Staff will be trained to ensure future changes in payroll costs are updated timely within the system and documentation maintained.
Finding Number 2024-001: Represents a significant deficiency in internal control over compliance with Western Maine Community Action, Inc.’s major federal programs. Repeat Finding: Yes Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Compliance Description: Payroll Expenditures – Approval of Time Sheets Major Programs: AL#10.557 - WIC Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants and Children – Award numbers: CD3-22-4658B and CD3-24-4658A; AL#81.042 – Weatherization – 80224, 80225, 81323, and 84023; AL#93.569 – Community Services Block Grant – Award numbers: CFS-23-7009 and CFS-24-7009 Questioned Costs: None How the questioned costs were computed: N/A Compliance Requirement: Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs, Cost Principles Condition: Out of a sample of 80 payroll transactions there were 3 where the timesheet was not properly approved by the supervisor prior to payroll being processed. Criteria: 2 CFR 200.430(i) states that “Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated”. Cause: The Organization does not have the proper review process in place to ensure that the timesheets are reviewed by supervisors prior to payroll being processed. Effect: Without proper review and approval of the hours allocated to the grants on the employee timesheets, it is possible that grants could be over or undercharged. Recommendation: We recommend the Organization implement systems and procedures to ensure timesheets are approved by supervisors prior to payroll being processed, to ensure grants are charged for the correct amount of payroll expenses. View of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the findings and has committed to a corrective action plan.
Finding Number 2024-001: Represents a significant deficiency in internal control over compliance with Western Maine Community Action, Inc.’s major federal programs. Repeat Finding: Yes Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Compliance Description: Payroll Expenditures – Approval of Time Sheets Major Programs: AL#10.557 - WIC Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants and Children – Award numbers: CD3-22-4658B and CD3-24-4658A; AL#81.042 – Weatherization – 80224, 80225, 81323, and 84023; AL#93.569 – Community Services Block Grant – Award numbers: CFS-23-7009 and CFS-24-7009 Questioned Costs: None How the questioned costs were computed: N/A Compliance Requirement: Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs, Cost Principles Condition: Out of a sample of 80 payroll transactions there were 3 where the timesheet was not properly approved by the supervisor prior to payroll being processed. Criteria: 2 CFR 200.430(i) states that “Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated”. Cause: The Organization does not have the proper review process in place to ensure that the timesheets are reviewed by supervisors prior to payroll being processed. Effect: Without proper review and approval of the hours allocated to the grants on the employee timesheets, it is possible that grants could be over or undercharged. Recommendation: We recommend the Organization implement systems and procedures to ensure timesheets are approved by supervisors prior to payroll being processed, to ensure grants are charged for the correct amount of payroll expenses. View of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the findings and has committed to a corrective action plan.
Finding Number 2024-001: Represents a significant deficiency in internal control over compliance with Western Maine Community Action, Inc.’s major federal programs. Repeat Finding: Yes Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Compliance Description: Payroll Expenditures – Approval of Time Sheets Major Programs: AL#10.557 - WIC Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants and Children – Award numbers: CD3-22-4658B and CD3-24-4658A; AL#81.042 – Weatherization – 80224, 80225, 81323, and 84023; AL#93.569 – Community Services Block Grant – Award numbers: CFS-23-7009 and CFS-24-7009 Questioned Costs: None How the questioned costs were computed: N/A Compliance Requirement: Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs, Cost Principles Condition: Out of a sample of 80 payroll transactions there were 3 where the timesheet was not properly approved by the supervisor prior to payroll being processed. Criteria: 2 CFR 200.430(i) states that “Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated”. Cause: The Organization does not have the proper review process in place to ensure that the timesheets are reviewed by supervisors prior to payroll being processed. Effect: Without proper review and approval of the hours allocated to the grants on the employee timesheets, it is possible that grants could be over or undercharged. Recommendation: We recommend the Organization implement systems and procedures to ensure timesheets are approved by supervisors prior to payroll being processed, to ensure grants are charged for the correct amount of payroll expenses. View of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the findings and has committed to a corrective action plan.
Finding Number 2024-001: Represents a significant deficiency in internal control over compliance with Western Maine Community Action, Inc.’s major federal programs. Repeat Finding: Yes Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Compliance Description: Payroll Expenditures – Approval of Time Sheets Major Programs: AL#10.557 - WIC Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants and Children – Award numbers: CD3-22-4658B and CD3-24-4658A; AL#81.042 – Weatherization – 80224, 80225, 81323, and 84023; AL#93.569 – Community Services Block Grant – Award numbers: CFS-23-7009 and CFS-24-7009 Questioned Costs: None How the questioned costs were computed: N/A Compliance Requirement: Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs, Cost Principles Condition: Out of a sample of 80 payroll transactions there were 3 where the timesheet was not properly approved by the supervisor prior to payroll being processed. Criteria: 2 CFR 200.430(i) states that “Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated”. Cause: The Organization does not have the proper review process in place to ensure that the timesheets are reviewed by supervisors prior to payroll being processed. Effect: Without proper review and approval of the hours allocated to the grants on the employee timesheets, it is possible that grants could be over or undercharged. Recommendation: We recommend the Organization implement systems and procedures to ensure timesheets are approved by supervisors prior to payroll being processed, to ensure grants are charged for the correct amount of payroll expenses. View of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the findings and has committed to a corrective action plan.
Finding Number 2024-001: Represents a significant deficiency in internal control over compliance with Western Maine Community Action, Inc.’s major federal programs. Repeat Finding: Yes Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Compliance Description: Payroll Expenditures – Approval of Time Sheets Major Programs: AL#10.557 - WIC Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants and Children – Award numbers: CD3-22-4658B and CD3-24-4658A; AL#81.042 – Weatherization – 80224, 80225, 81323, and 84023; AL#93.569 – Community Services Block Grant – Award numbers: CFS-23-7009 and CFS-24-7009 Questioned Costs: None How the questioned costs were computed: N/A Compliance Requirement: Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs, Cost Principles Condition: Out of a sample of 80 payroll transactions there were 3 where the timesheet was not properly approved by the supervisor prior to payroll being processed. Criteria: 2 CFR 200.430(i) states that “Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated”. Cause: The Organization does not have the proper review process in place to ensure that the timesheets are reviewed by supervisors prior to payroll being processed. Effect: Without proper review and approval of the hours allocated to the grants on the employee timesheets, it is possible that grants could be over or undercharged. Recommendation: We recommend the Organization implement systems and procedures to ensure timesheets are approved by supervisors prior to payroll being processed, to ensure grants are charged for the correct amount of payroll expenses. View of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the findings and has committed to a corrective action plan.
2024-007 Lack of Semi-Annual Certifications for Special Education Personnel Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance New or Repeat Finding: New Federal Program: Special Education Cluster (ALNs 84.027, 84.173) Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-through Entity(ies): Texas Education Agency (246600010849086600, 246610010849086610, 66002406, 225350020849025000, 225360020849025360), Region 10 Education Service Center (236600497110001) Compliance Requirement: B - Allowable Costs / Costs Principles Criteria: Under 2 CFR 200.430(g), when employees work solely on a single federal award or cost objective, charges for their salaries must be supported by a system of internal control that provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. One allowable method is through completion of semi-annual certifications signed by the employee or a supervisory official with firsthand knowledge. These certifications provide assurance that salary costs charged to the federal program reflects the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the District, not exceeding 100% of compensated activities. Condition: The district did not maintain required semi-annual certifications for employees who worked solely on the Special Education Cluster (IDEA) programs. These certifications, which confirm that the employee worked 100% on the program for the period covered, were missing for all employees. Cause: The district did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure the forms were prepared, signed, and retained in accordance with federal requirements. Staff turnover and limited awareness of the documentation rules contributed to the oversight. Effect or Potential Effect: Without semi-annual certifications, the district lacks required documentation to fully support salary costs charged to the Special Education Cluster. This raises the risk that unallowable or unsupported personnel costs were charged to the program, even if employees were appropriately assigned. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs were identified, as auditors were able to verify through alternative procedures that employees worked solely on the program. The personnel records of the employees sampled contained approval of the employee to be hired into the appropriate job duties to be funded by special education cluster grant funds. Context: The district was unable to provide required semi-annual certifications for 14 out of 14 employees selected in our sample for testing. Recommendation: We recommend that the district develop and implement written procedures to ensure that semiannual certifications are prepared, signed, and retained for all employees working solely on federal programs. The district should provide training to finance and program staff to ensure continued compliance with federal documentation requirements. Views of Responsible Officials: District officials agree with the finding. The District has implemented new procedures in fiscal year 2025 to ensure semi-annual certifications are completed appropriately.
2024-007 Lack of Semi-Annual Certifications for Special Education Personnel Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance New or Repeat Finding: New Federal Program: Special Education Cluster (ALNs 84.027, 84.173) Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-through Entity(ies): Texas Education Agency (246600010849086600, 246610010849086610, 66002406, 225350020849025000, 225360020849025360), Region 10 Education Service Center (236600497110001) Compliance Requirement: B - Allowable Costs / Costs Principles Criteria: Under 2 CFR 200.430(g), when employees work solely on a single federal award or cost objective, charges for their salaries must be supported by a system of internal control that provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. One allowable method is through completion of semi-annual certifications signed by the employee or a supervisory official with firsthand knowledge. These certifications provide assurance that salary costs charged to the federal program reflects the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the District, not exceeding 100% of compensated activities. Condition: The district did not maintain required semi-annual certifications for employees who worked solely on the Special Education Cluster (IDEA) programs. These certifications, which confirm that the employee worked 100% on the program for the period covered, were missing for all employees. Cause: The district did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure the forms were prepared, signed, and retained in accordance with federal requirements. Staff turnover and limited awareness of the documentation rules contributed to the oversight. Effect or Potential Effect: Without semi-annual certifications, the district lacks required documentation to fully support salary costs charged to the Special Education Cluster. This raises the risk that unallowable or unsupported personnel costs were charged to the program, even if employees were appropriately assigned. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs were identified, as auditors were able to verify through alternative procedures that employees worked solely on the program. The personnel records of the employees sampled contained approval of the employee to be hired into the appropriate job duties to be funded by special education cluster grant funds. Context: The district was unable to provide required semi-annual certifications for 14 out of 14 employees selected in our sample for testing. Recommendation: We recommend that the district develop and implement written procedures to ensure that semiannual certifications are prepared, signed, and retained for all employees working solely on federal programs. The district should provide training to finance and program staff to ensure continued compliance with federal documentation requirements. Views of Responsible Officials: District officials agree with the finding. The District has implemented new procedures in fiscal year 2025 to ensure semi-annual certifications are completed appropriately.
2024-007 Lack of Semi-Annual Certifications for Special Education Personnel Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance New or Repeat Finding: New Federal Program: Special Education Cluster (ALNs 84.027, 84.173) Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-through Entity(ies): Texas Education Agency (246600010849086600, 246610010849086610, 66002406, 225350020849025000, 225360020849025360), Region 10 Education Service Center (236600497110001) Compliance Requirement: B - Allowable Costs / Costs Principles Criteria: Under 2 CFR 200.430(g), when employees work solely on a single federal award or cost objective, charges for their salaries must be supported by a system of internal control that provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. One allowable method is through completion of semi-annual certifications signed by the employee or a supervisory official with firsthand knowledge. These certifications provide assurance that salary costs charged to the federal program reflects the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the District, not exceeding 100% of compensated activities. Condition: The district did not maintain required semi-annual certifications for employees who worked solely on the Special Education Cluster (IDEA) programs. These certifications, which confirm that the employee worked 100% on the program for the period covered, were missing for all employees. Cause: The district did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure the forms were prepared, signed, and retained in accordance with federal requirements. Staff turnover and limited awareness of the documentation rules contributed to the oversight. Effect or Potential Effect: Without semi-annual certifications, the district lacks required documentation to fully support salary costs charged to the Special Education Cluster. This raises the risk that unallowable or unsupported personnel costs were charged to the program, even if employees were appropriately assigned. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs were identified, as auditors were able to verify through alternative procedures that employees worked solely on the program. The personnel records of the employees sampled contained approval of the employee to be hired into the appropriate job duties to be funded by special education cluster grant funds. Context: The district was unable to provide required semi-annual certifications for 14 out of 14 employees selected in our sample for testing. Recommendation: We recommend that the district develop and implement written procedures to ensure that semiannual certifications are prepared, signed, and retained for all employees working solely on federal programs. The district should provide training to finance and program staff to ensure continued compliance with federal documentation requirements. Views of Responsible Officials: District officials agree with the finding. The District has implemented new procedures in fiscal year 2025 to ensure semi-annual certifications are completed appropriately.
2024-007 Lack of Semi-Annual Certifications for Special Education Personnel Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance New or Repeat Finding: New Federal Program: Special Education Cluster (ALNs 84.027, 84.173) Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-through Entity(ies): Texas Education Agency (246600010849086600, 246610010849086610, 66002406, 225350020849025000, 225360020849025360), Region 10 Education Service Center (236600497110001) Compliance Requirement: B - Allowable Costs / Costs Principles Criteria: Under 2 CFR 200.430(g), when employees work solely on a single federal award or cost objective, charges for their salaries must be supported by a system of internal control that provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. One allowable method is through completion of semi-annual certifications signed by the employee or a supervisory official with firsthand knowledge. These certifications provide assurance that salary costs charged to the federal program reflects the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the District, not exceeding 100% of compensated activities. Condition: The district did not maintain required semi-annual certifications for employees who worked solely on the Special Education Cluster (IDEA) programs. These certifications, which confirm that the employee worked 100% on the program for the period covered, were missing for all employees. Cause: The district did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure the forms were prepared, signed, and retained in accordance with federal requirements. Staff turnover and limited awareness of the documentation rules contributed to the oversight. Effect or Potential Effect: Without semi-annual certifications, the district lacks required documentation to fully support salary costs charged to the Special Education Cluster. This raises the risk that unallowable or unsupported personnel costs were charged to the program, even if employees were appropriately assigned. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs were identified, as auditors were able to verify through alternative procedures that employees worked solely on the program. The personnel records of the employees sampled contained approval of the employee to be hired into the appropriate job duties to be funded by special education cluster grant funds. Context: The district was unable to provide required semi-annual certifications for 14 out of 14 employees selected in our sample for testing. Recommendation: We recommend that the district develop and implement written procedures to ensure that semiannual certifications are prepared, signed, and retained for all employees working solely on federal programs. The district should provide training to finance and program staff to ensure continued compliance with federal documentation requirements. Views of Responsible Officials: District officials agree with the finding. The District has implemented new procedures in fiscal year 2025 to ensure semi-annual certifications are completed appropriately.
2024-007 Lack of Semi-Annual Certifications for Special Education Personnel Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance New or Repeat Finding: New Federal Program: Special Education Cluster (ALNs 84.027, 84.173) Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-through Entity(ies): Texas Education Agency (246600010849086600, 246610010849086610, 66002406, 225350020849025000, 225360020849025360), Region 10 Education Service Center (236600497110001) Compliance Requirement: B - Allowable Costs / Costs Principles Criteria: Under 2 CFR 200.430(g), when employees work solely on a single federal award or cost objective, charges for their salaries must be supported by a system of internal control that provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. One allowable method is through completion of semi-annual certifications signed by the employee or a supervisory official with firsthand knowledge. These certifications provide assurance that salary costs charged to the federal program reflects the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the District, not exceeding 100% of compensated activities. Condition: The district did not maintain required semi-annual certifications for employees who worked solely on the Special Education Cluster (IDEA) programs. These certifications, which confirm that the employee worked 100% on the program for the period covered, were missing for all employees. Cause: The district did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure the forms were prepared, signed, and retained in accordance with federal requirements. Staff turnover and limited awareness of the documentation rules contributed to the oversight. Effect or Potential Effect: Without semi-annual certifications, the district lacks required documentation to fully support salary costs charged to the Special Education Cluster. This raises the risk that unallowable or unsupported personnel costs were charged to the program, even if employees were appropriately assigned. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs were identified, as auditors were able to verify through alternative procedures that employees worked solely on the program. The personnel records of the employees sampled contained approval of the employee to be hired into the appropriate job duties to be funded by special education cluster grant funds. Context: The district was unable to provide required semi-annual certifications for 14 out of 14 employees selected in our sample for testing. Recommendation: We recommend that the district develop and implement written procedures to ensure that semiannual certifications are prepared, signed, and retained for all employees working solely on federal programs. The district should provide training to finance and program staff to ensure continued compliance with federal documentation requirements. Views of Responsible Officials: District officials agree with the finding. The District has implemented new procedures in fiscal year 2025 to ensure semi-annual certifications are completed appropriately.
2024-007 Lack of Semi-Annual Certifications for Special Education Personnel Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance New or Repeat Finding: New Federal Program: Special Education Cluster (ALNs 84.027, 84.173) Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-through Entity(ies): Texas Education Agency (246600010849086600, 246610010849086610, 66002406, 225350020849025000, 225360020849025360), Region 10 Education Service Center (236600497110001) Compliance Requirement: B - Allowable Costs / Costs Principles Criteria: Under 2 CFR 200.430(g), when employees work solely on a single federal award or cost objective, charges for their salaries must be supported by a system of internal control that provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. One allowable method is through completion of semi-annual certifications signed by the employee or a supervisory official with firsthand knowledge. These certifications provide assurance that salary costs charged to the federal program reflects the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the District, not exceeding 100% of compensated activities. Condition: The district did not maintain required semi-annual certifications for employees who worked solely on the Special Education Cluster (IDEA) programs. These certifications, which confirm that the employee worked 100% on the program for the period covered, were missing for all employees. Cause: The district did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure the forms were prepared, signed, and retained in accordance with federal requirements. Staff turnover and limited awareness of the documentation rules contributed to the oversight. Effect or Potential Effect: Without semi-annual certifications, the district lacks required documentation to fully support salary costs charged to the Special Education Cluster. This raises the risk that unallowable or unsupported personnel costs were charged to the program, even if employees were appropriately assigned. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs were identified, as auditors were able to verify through alternative procedures that employees worked solely on the program. The personnel records of the employees sampled contained approval of the employee to be hired into the appropriate job duties to be funded by special education cluster grant funds. Context: The district was unable to provide required semi-annual certifications for 14 out of 14 employees selected in our sample for testing. Recommendation: We recommend that the district develop and implement written procedures to ensure that semiannual certifications are prepared, signed, and retained for all employees working solely on federal programs. The district should provide training to finance and program staff to ensure continued compliance with federal documentation requirements. Views of Responsible Officials: District officials agree with the finding. The District has implemented new procedures in fiscal year 2025 to ensure semi-annual certifications are completed appropriately.
A. Finding on Internal Control over Compliance Finding Reference: 2024-001 Federal Agency: U.S. Dept of Education Federal program: IDEA - Part B, Section 611 (84.027) IDEA- Part B, Section 619 (84.173), Title I, Part A (84.010) Compliance Requirement: Activities Allowed or Unallowed Type of Finding: a.) Significant Deficiencies in Internal Control Over Compliance b.) Compliance Finding Criteria: According to 2 CFR, Part 200.430(i)(l) of the Office of Management and Budget's Uniform Grant Guidance, charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed, which must, amoung other things: a) Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated; b) Be incorporated into the official records of the non-Federal entity; c) reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non-Federal entity; d) Encompass both federally assisted and all other actvities compensated by the non-Federal entity; e) Support for the distribution of the employee's salary or wages amount specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and non-Federal award; an indirect cost activity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities which are allocated using different allocation bases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity. Condition: District employees whose time was being charged to the grants, who were working both 100% and less than 100% of the time in the federal award program, were required to complete semi-annual or monthly certifications of the percentage of time they worked in each federal award program however, they were not completed timely and not completed by all employees whose time was charged to the gratns. In one instance, an employee's time was charged to the grant that did not work in the gratn. Cause: The School District did not have adequate internal controls in place to ensure that the semi annual or monthly certifications were being completed by each employee working in the federal award programs timely. Effect: Without adequate internal contyrols over the employee's time being charged to the grant and the certification requirement, the School District cannot ensure that the federal funds are paid in accordance with allowable costs and the time worked in the grant. Additionally, they cannot easily monitor the amount of funds that can be charged to the grant for salaries and benefits. Payments that do not agree with the time worked are unallowable and subject to recovery by the grantor. Indentification of a Repeat Finding: This is a repeat finding for IDEA, Section 611 (84.027) and Section 619 (84.173), from the immediate previous audit, 2023-001. Questioned Costs: The employee's certifications in questions were reviewed and after reviewing the allocation of each employee's time it was determined that the time being charged to the gratn was appropriate. Additionally, for the one employee charged to the grant in error, we reviewed documentation for an employee who workied in the grant but shose time was not charged to the grant and determined that there were no questioned costs. Recommendation: We recommend that the District have propert internal controls in place to ensure that the employees working in the grants are certifying their actual percent of time and effort that is being spent working in the federal award program and completed timely. . Monthly certifications should be completed if less than 100% of time is being worked in the federal award program or semiannually if 100% of time is being spent. Internal controls should also be in place to ensure that only those employees who are working in the grant are being charged to the grant. Management Response: The District agrees with the audit finding and will implement adequate checks and balances to ensure that this problem does not recur. Please refer to the corrective action plan.
A. Finding on Internal Control over Compliance Finding Reference: 2024-001 Federal Agency: U.S. Dept of Education Federal program: IDEA - Part B, Section 611 (84.027) IDEA- Part B, Section 619 (84.173), Title I, Part A (84.010) Compliance Requirement: Activities Allowed or Unallowed Type of Finding: a.) Significant Deficiencies in Internal Control Over Compliance b.) Compliance Finding Criteria: According to 2 CFR, Part 200.430(i)(l) of the Office of Management and Budget's Uniform Grant Guidance, charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed, which must, amoung other things: a) Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated; b) Be incorporated into the official records of the non-Federal entity; c) reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non-Federal entity; d) Encompass both federally assisted and all other actvities compensated by the non-Federal entity; e) Support for the distribution of the employee's salary or wages amount specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and non-Federal award; an indirect cost activity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities which are allocated using different allocation bases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity. Condition: District employees whose time was being charged to the grants, who were working both 100% and less than 100% of the time in the federal award program, were required to complete semi-annual or monthly certifications of the percentage of time they worked in each federal award program however, they were not completed timely and not completed by all employees whose time was charged to the gratns. In one instance, an employee's time was charged to the grant that did not work in the gratn. Cause: The School District did not have adequate internal controls in place to ensure that the semi annual or monthly certifications were being completed by each employee working in the federal award programs timely. Effect: Without adequate internal contyrols over the employee's time being charged to the grant and the certification requirement, the School District cannot ensure that the federal funds are paid in accordance with allowable costs and the time worked in the grant. Additionally, they cannot easily monitor the amount of funds that can be charged to the grant for salaries and benefits. Payments that do not agree with the time worked are unallowable and subject to recovery by the grantor. Indentification of a Repeat Finding: This is a repeat finding for IDEA, Section 611 (84.027) and Section 619 (84.173), from the immediate previous audit, 2023-001. Questioned Costs: The employee's certifications in questions were reviewed and after reviewing the allocation of each employee's time it was determined that the time being charged to the gratn was appropriate. Additionally, for the one employee charged to the grant in error, we reviewed documentation for an employee who workied in the grant but shose time was not charged to the grant and determined that there were no questioned costs. Recommendation: We recommend that the District have propert internal controls in place to ensure that the employees working in the grants are certifying their actual percent of time and effort that is being spent working in the federal award program and completed timely. . Monthly certifications should be completed if less than 100% of time is being worked in the federal award program or semiannually if 100% of time is being spent. Internal controls should also be in place to ensure that only those employees who are working in the grant are being charged to the grant. Management Response: The District agrees with the audit finding and will implement adequate checks and balances to ensure that this problem does not recur. Please refer to the corrective action plan.
A. Finding on Internal Control over Compliance Finding Reference: 2024-001 Federal Agency: U.S. Dept of Education Federal program: IDEA - Part B, Section 611 (84.027) IDEA- Part B, Section 619 (84.173), Title I, Part A (84.010) Compliance Requirement: Activities Allowed or Unallowed Type of Finding: a.) Significant Deficiencies in Internal Control Over Compliance b.) Compliance Finding Criteria: According to 2 CFR, Part 200.430(i)(l) of the Office of Management and Budget's Uniform Grant Guidance, charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed, which must, amoung other things: a) Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated; b) Be incorporated into the official records of the non-Federal entity; c) reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non-Federal entity; d) Encompass both federally assisted and all other actvities compensated by the non-Federal entity; e) Support for the distribution of the employee's salary or wages amount specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and non-Federal award; an indirect cost activity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities which are allocated using different allocation bases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity. Condition: District employees whose time was being charged to the grants, who were working both 100% and less than 100% of the time in the federal award program, were required to complete semi-annual or monthly certifications of the percentage of time they worked in each federal award program however, they were not completed timely and not completed by all employees whose time was charged to the gratns. In one instance, an employee's time was charged to the grant that did not work in the gratn. Cause: The School District did not have adequate internal controls in place to ensure that the semi annual or monthly certifications were being completed by each employee working in the federal award programs timely. Effect: Without adequate internal contyrols over the employee's time being charged to the grant and the certification requirement, the School District cannot ensure that the federal funds are paid in accordance with allowable costs and the time worked in the grant. Additionally, they cannot easily monitor the amount of funds that can be charged to the grant for salaries and benefits. Payments that do not agree with the time worked are unallowable and subject to recovery by the grantor. Indentification of a Repeat Finding: This is a repeat finding for IDEA, Section 611 (84.027) and Section 619 (84.173), from the immediate previous audit, 2023-001. Questioned Costs: The employee's certifications in questions were reviewed and after reviewing the allocation of each employee's time it was determined that the time being charged to the gratn was appropriate. Additionally, for the one employee charged to the grant in error, we reviewed documentation for an employee who workied in the grant but shose time was not charged to the grant and determined that there were no questioned costs. Recommendation: We recommend that the District have propert internal controls in place to ensure that the employees working in the grants are certifying their actual percent of time and effort that is being spent working in the federal award program and completed timely. . Monthly certifications should be completed if less than 100% of time is being worked in the federal award program or semiannually if 100% of time is being spent. Internal controls should also be in place to ensure that only those employees who are working in the grant are being charged to the grant. Management Response: The District agrees with the audit finding and will implement adequate checks and balances to ensure that this problem does not recur. Please refer to the corrective action plan.
Material Weakness in Internal Controls over Compliance (Allowable Costs/Cost Principles), and Noncompliance with Laws and Regulations. Program Impacted: 84.010 – Title I, Part A. Criteria: 2 CFR 200.430(i) requires that charges to federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. Among other requirements identified in this section, these records must (i) be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated, and (v) comply with the established accounting policies and practices of the District. Condition: The District did not maintain adequate controls over time and effort reporting to substantiate salaries and wages charged to the Title I, Part A grant. Cause: The District’s oversight of salaries and wages charged to the Title I, Part A grant was insufficient. Effect: The District was unable to support the accuracy of salaries and wages charged to the Title I, Part A grant. Questioned Costs: The District adjusted unsupported charges from the grant via the final request for reimbursement for the fiscal year expenditures. No questioned costs after adjustments. Context: The District utilized Personnel Activity Reports (PARs) for split-funded personnel as the control over salaries and wages charged to the Title I, Part A grant. The PARs identify the employee and total hours spent on grant-funded activities, supporting the rate at which they are to be charged during the specified period. During our review of salaries and wages charged to the grant during the audit period, we noted instances of one individual being charged at rates in excess of those specified on the associated PAR. Recommendation: We recommend that the District adhere to documented time and effort reporting procedures and maintain effective internal controls that ensure salaries and wages are allocated based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. View of Responsible Officials: The District agrees with the finding and will adhere to documented time and effort reporting procedures to ensure that salaries and wages allocated to federal awards are accurate and adequately supported.
Significant Deficiency 2024-004 Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases (ELC) – 93.323 Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs and Cost Principles Criteria or specific requirement In accordance with 2 CFR 200.430, payroll charges should be supported by proper documentation that reflects the distribution of the employee’s salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on a Federal award and non-Federal award. In addition, in order to ensure that employees are paid the correct amount and that no conflict of interest may occur, internal controls should be put in place to ensure that all wage rates paid have been approved by the Board. Condition Three employees were paid an additional amount using program funding in order to reflect the administrative burden associated with running the program for three years. For two of the employees, no personnel activity reports or other time records could be provided to support those costs. For the third employee, a monthly log of hours worked on grant activities was provided. However, it only showed the total hours for that month and did not break them out by date of occurrence. Additionally, no supervisor review or other control over that log occurred. Lastly, the employees’ contracts were not amended and approved by the Board to reflect these additional amounts. Context We determined, through testing of program expenditures, that $16,162 was paid in gross wages and taxes for the three employees. Cause District employees do not have a significant amount of experience with large federal programs, and they were not aware of the compliance requirements. Effect Proper records were not maintained to support program expenditures. Recommendation Employees with grant administration responsibilities should undergo training to better their understanding of the compliance requirements that accompany Federal programs. Additionally, controls should be implemented to ensure that all required records are prepared, as well as to ensure that the Board approves all wage rates. Views of responsible officials See corrective action plan.
2024-002 – Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Major Federal Program and Noncompliance – Documentation of Employee Time and Effort. Career and Technical Education – Basic Grants to the States, ALN # 84.048 and 84.048A, Award Numbers 233480 231400, 233480 231405, 233480 231410 and 243520 24124 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Criteria – Title 2 CFR 200.430 states that charges to federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. It is the School District’s procedure to utilize semi-annual certifications for all employees paid through federal funds. Condition- The School District did not sufficiently document its employees’ actual time spent on federal programs by completing semi-annual certifications or recording their time accurately on their timesheets. Except for the administration, the employees were hired as full-time employees specifically for the Career and Technical Education grant, and although their time was accurately calculated and posted to the grant in their payroll system, the timesheets were not accurate, and the semi-annual certifications were not completed. Incorrect timesheets were noted for six of the twenty-five employees tested and missing semi-annual certification were missing for twenty-five of the twenty-five employees tested. Questioned Costs – None, the employees time was accurately calculated and recorded to the grant in the payroll system. Cause and Effect – The School District’s Career and Technical Education Program Director fell ill during the school year. The Associate Superintendent for Business and Operations stepped up to run the program in addition to her regular duties. The School District did not follow the Board Policy regarding “Time and Effort Reporting”. It appears staffing issues led to a lack of internal controls to identify and correct these errors and ensure complete compliance. Recommendation – We recommend the School District directs personnel to oversee the compliance of the Career and Technical Education grants and can verify employees are completing the “Time and Effort” reporting as required by the grant and the School Districts policy of same – annual certification for all employees paid through federal grants. View of Responsible Officials – The School District agrees with our finding and recommendation. Planned Corrective Actions – See corrective action plan, annexed.
2024-002 – Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Major Federal Program and Noncompliance – Documentation of Employee Time and Effort. Career and Technical Education – Basic Grants to the States, ALN # 84.048 and 84.048A, Award Numbers 233480 231400, 233480 231405, 233480 231410 and 243520 24124 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Criteria – Title 2 CFR 200.430 states that charges to federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. It is the School District’s procedure to utilize semi-annual certifications for all employees paid through federal funds. Condition- The School District did not sufficiently document its employees’ actual time spent on federal programs by completing semi-annual certifications or recording their time accurately on their timesheets. Except for the administration, the employees were hired as full-time employees specifically for the Career and Technical Education grant, and although their time was accurately calculated and posted to the grant in their payroll system, the timesheets were not accurate, and the semi-annual certifications were not completed. Incorrect timesheets were noted for six of the twenty-five employees tested and missing semi-annual certification were missing for twenty-five of the twenty-five employees tested. Questioned Costs – None, the employees time was accurately calculated and recorded to the grant in the payroll system. Cause and Effect – The School District’s Career and Technical Education Program Director fell ill during the school year. The Associate Superintendent for Business and Operations stepped up to run the program in addition to her regular duties. The School District did not follow the Board Policy regarding “Time and Effort Reporting”. It appears staffing issues led to a lack of internal controls to identify and correct these errors and ensure complete compliance. Recommendation – We recommend the School District directs personnel to oversee the compliance of the Career and Technical Education grants and can verify employees are completing the “Time and Effort” reporting as required by the grant and the School Districts policy of same – annual certification for all employees paid through federal grants. View of Responsible Officials – The School District agrees with our finding and recommendation. Planned Corrective Actions – See corrective action plan, annexed.
2024-002 – Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Major Federal Program and Noncompliance – Documentation of Employee Time and Effort. Career and Technical Education – Basic Grants to the States, ALN # 84.048 and 84.048A, Award Numbers 233480 231400, 233480 231405, 233480 231410 and 243520 24124 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Criteria – Title 2 CFR 200.430 states that charges to federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. It is the School District’s procedure to utilize semi-annual certifications for all employees paid through federal funds. Condition- The School District did not sufficiently document its employees’ actual time spent on federal programs by completing semi-annual certifications or recording their time accurately on their timesheets. Except for the administration, the employees were hired as full-time employees specifically for the Career and Technical Education grant, and although their time was accurately calculated and posted to the grant in their payroll system, the timesheets were not accurate, and the semi-annual certifications were not completed. Incorrect timesheets were noted for six of the twenty-five employees tested and missing semi-annual certification were missing for twenty-five of the twenty-five employees tested. Questioned Costs – None, the employees time was accurately calculated and recorded to the grant in the payroll system. Cause and Effect – The School District’s Career and Technical Education Program Director fell ill during the school year. The Associate Superintendent for Business and Operations stepped up to run the program in addition to her regular duties. The School District did not follow the Board Policy regarding “Time and Effort Reporting”. It appears staffing issues led to a lack of internal controls to identify and correct these errors and ensure complete compliance. Recommendation – We recommend the School District directs personnel to oversee the compliance of the Career and Technical Education grants and can verify employees are completing the “Time and Effort” reporting as required by the grant and the School Districts policy of same – annual certification for all employees paid through federal grants. View of Responsible Officials – The School District agrees with our finding and recommendation. Planned Corrective Actions – See corrective action plan, annexed.
2024-002 – Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Major Federal Program and Noncompliance – Documentation of Employee Time and Effort. Career and Technical Education – Basic Grants to the States, ALN # 84.048 and 84.048A, Award Numbers 233480 231400, 233480 231405, 233480 231410 and 243520 24124 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Criteria – Title 2 CFR 200.430 states that charges to federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. It is the School District’s procedure to utilize semi-annual certifications for all employees paid through federal funds. Condition- The School District did not sufficiently document its employees’ actual time spent on federal programs by completing semi-annual certifications or recording their time accurately on their timesheets. Except for the administration, the employees were hired as full-time employees specifically for the Career and Technical Education grant, and although their time was accurately calculated and posted to the grant in their payroll system, the timesheets were not accurate, and the semi-annual certifications were not completed. Incorrect timesheets were noted for six of the twenty-five employees tested and missing semi-annual certification were missing for twenty-five of the twenty-five employees tested. Questioned Costs – None, the employees time was accurately calculated and recorded to the grant in the payroll system. Cause and Effect – The School District’s Career and Technical Education Program Director fell ill during the school year. The Associate Superintendent for Business and Operations stepped up to run the program in addition to her regular duties. The School District did not follow the Board Policy regarding “Time and Effort Reporting”. It appears staffing issues led to a lack of internal controls to identify and correct these errors and ensure complete compliance. Recommendation – We recommend the School District directs personnel to oversee the compliance of the Career and Technical Education grants and can verify employees are completing the “Time and Effort” reporting as required by the grant and the School Districts policy of same – annual certification for all employees paid through federal grants. View of Responsible Officials – The School District agrees with our finding and recommendation. Planned Corrective Actions – See corrective action plan, annexed.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education passed through the State of Alaska, Department of Education and Early Development (DEED) Federal Program(s): COVID-19 CRRSA ACT: ESSER II / ARP ACT: ESSER III (ESSER) and Title I-A Assistance Listing Number(s):84.425 U and D and 84.010A Award Number(s): Federal award numbers: S425U210020, S425D210020 (ESSER), S010A230002, and S010A230002 (Title I-A), Pass through entity award numbers: ER 24.YFSD.01 (ESSER), IP 24.YFSD.01, and SI 24.YFSD.01 (Title I-A). Award Year(s): 2024 Type of Finding: Significant deficiency in internal control over compliance. Criteria: Management is responsible for designing, implementing and maintaining internal controls relevant to ensuring that transactions charged to programs follow proper internal control processes (2 CFR Part 200 Subpart E § 200.400 (d)). Further, Uniform Guidance Requirements, which also apply to expenditures of ESSER funds, dictate the funding recipient is required to follow document personnel costs in accordance with 2 CFR Section 200.430 (i). The District is required to maintain time distribution records for employees funded under Federal Programs. Condition and Context: We tested a sample of fifteen (15) payroll transactions for ESSER and seven (7) payroll transactions for Title I-A. We were unable to verify the funding allocation for eleven (11) transactions for the ESSER funding and four (4) transactions for the Title I-A funding. The payroll expenditures charged to these programs were recorded using journal entries and lacked documentation of time and effort. The employee positions were not considered unallowable under the programs. Cause: Lack of internal controls over payroll expenditure allocation. Effect: The lack of supporting documentation indicating the payroll expenditure allocation allows for the potential of payroll expenditures to be incorrectly charge to unallowable funding sources. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding, however, due to the number of exceptions identified, we believe this to be a systemic issue. Questioned Costs: None reported. Recommendation: We recommend that management ensures employee personnel action forms are updated to reflect the correct fund allocations for payroll costs to ensure employees time is appropriately coded. Additionally, if charged to federal grant sources that time and effort be adequately tracked and documented. Management Response: Management agrees with this finding, see Corrective Action Plan.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education passed through the State of Alaska, Department of Education and Early Development (DEED) Federal Program(s): COVID-19 CRRSA ACT: ESSER II / ARP ACT: ESSER III (ESSER) and Title I-A Assistance Listing Number(s):84.425 U and D and 84.010A Award Number(s): Federal award numbers: S425U210020, S425D210020 (ESSER), S010A230002, and S010A230002 (Title I-A), Pass through entity award numbers: ER 24.YFSD.01 (ESSER), IP 24.YFSD.01, and SI 24.YFSD.01 (Title I-A). Award Year(s): 2024 Type of Finding: Significant deficiency in internal control over compliance. Criteria: Management is responsible for designing, implementing and maintaining internal controls relevant to ensuring that transactions charged to programs follow proper internal control processes (2 CFR Part 200 Subpart E § 200.400 (d)). Further, Uniform Guidance Requirements, which also apply to expenditures of ESSER funds, dictate the funding recipient is required to follow document personnel costs in accordance with 2 CFR Section 200.430 (i). The District is required to maintain time distribution records for employees funded under Federal Programs. Condition and Context: We tested a sample of fifteen (15) payroll transactions for ESSER and seven (7) payroll transactions for Title I-A. We were unable to verify the funding allocation for eleven (11) transactions for the ESSER funding and four (4) transactions for the Title I-A funding. The payroll expenditures charged to these programs were recorded using journal entries and lacked documentation of time and effort. The employee positions were not considered unallowable under the programs. Cause: Lack of internal controls over payroll expenditure allocation. Effect: The lack of supporting documentation indicating the payroll expenditure allocation allows for the potential of payroll expenditures to be incorrectly charge to unallowable funding sources. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding, however, due to the number of exceptions identified, we believe this to be a systemic issue. Questioned Costs: None reported. Recommendation: We recommend that management ensures employee personnel action forms are updated to reflect the correct fund allocations for payroll costs to ensure employees time is appropriately coded. Additionally, if charged to federal grant sources that time and effort be adequately tracked and documented. Management Response: Management agrees with this finding, see Corrective Action Plan.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education passed through the State of Alaska, Department of Education and Early Development (DEED) Federal Program(s): COVID-19 CRRSA ACT: ESSER II / ARP ACT: ESSER III (ESSER) and Title I-A Assistance Listing Number(s):84.425 U and D and 84.010A Award Number(s): Federal award numbers: S425U210020, S425D210020 (ESSER), S010A230002, and S010A230002 (Title I-A), Pass through entity award numbers: ER 24.YFSD.01 (ESSER), IP 24.YFSD.01, and SI 24.YFSD.01 (Title I-A). Award Year(s): 2024 Type of Finding: Significant deficiency in internal control over compliance. Criteria: Management is responsible for designing, implementing and maintaining internal controls relevant to ensuring that transactions charged to programs follow proper internal control processes (2 CFR Part 200 Subpart E § 200.400 (d)). Further, Uniform Guidance Requirements, which also apply to expenditures of ESSER funds, dictate the funding recipient is required to follow document personnel costs in accordance with 2 CFR Section 200.430 (i). The District is required to maintain time distribution records for employees funded under Federal Programs. Condition and Context: We tested a sample of fifteen (15) payroll transactions for ESSER and seven (7) payroll transactions for Title I-A. We were unable to verify the funding allocation for eleven (11) transactions for the ESSER funding and four (4) transactions for the Title I-A funding. The payroll expenditures charged to these programs were recorded using journal entries and lacked documentation of time and effort. The employee positions were not considered unallowable under the programs. Cause: Lack of internal controls over payroll expenditure allocation. Effect: The lack of supporting documentation indicating the payroll expenditure allocation allows for the potential of payroll expenditures to be incorrectly charge to unallowable funding sources. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding, however, due to the number of exceptions identified, we believe this to be a systemic issue. Questioned Costs: None reported. Recommendation: We recommend that management ensures employee personnel action forms are updated to reflect the correct fund allocations for payroll costs to ensure employees time is appropriately coded. Additionally, if charged to federal grant sources that time and effort be adequately tracked and documented. Management Response: Management agrees with this finding, see Corrective Action Plan.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education passed through the State of Alaska, Department of Education and Early Development (DEED) Federal Program(s): COVID-19 CRRSA ACT: ESSER II / ARP ACT: ESSER III (ESSER) and Title I-A Assistance Listing Number(s):84.425 U and D and 84.010A Award Number(s): Federal award numbers: S425U210020, S425D210020 (ESSER), S010A230002, and S010A230002 (Title I-A), Pass through entity award numbers: ER 24.YFSD.01 (ESSER), IP 24.YFSD.01, and SI 24.YFSD.01 (Title I-A). Award Year(s): 2024 Type of Finding: Significant deficiency in internal control over compliance. Criteria: Management is responsible for designing, implementing and maintaining internal controls relevant to ensuring that transactions charged to programs follow proper internal control processes (2 CFR Part 200 Subpart E § 200.400 (d)). Further, Uniform Guidance Requirements, which also apply to expenditures of ESSER funds, dictate the funding recipient is required to follow document personnel costs in accordance with 2 CFR Section 200.430 (i). The District is required to maintain time distribution records for employees funded under Federal Programs. Condition and Context: We tested a sample of fifteen (15) payroll transactions for ESSER and seven (7) payroll transactions for Title I-A. We were unable to verify the funding allocation for eleven (11) transactions for the ESSER funding and four (4) transactions for the Title I-A funding. The payroll expenditures charged to these programs were recorded using journal entries and lacked documentation of time and effort. The employee positions were not considered unallowable under the programs. Cause: Lack of internal controls over payroll expenditure allocation. Effect: The lack of supporting documentation indicating the payroll expenditure allocation allows for the potential of payroll expenditures to be incorrectly charge to unallowable funding sources. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding, however, due to the number of exceptions identified, we believe this to be a systemic issue. Questioned Costs: None reported. Recommendation: We recommend that management ensures employee personnel action forms are updated to reflect the correct fund allocations for payroll costs to ensure employees time is appropriately coded. Additionally, if charged to federal grant sources that time and effort be adequately tracked and documented. Management Response: Management agrees with this finding, see Corrective Action Plan.
Federal Agency U.S. Department of Education Federal Program Name Higher Educational Institutional Aid Assistance Listing Number 84.031X Federal Award Identification Number and Year " P031X220005 - 2024, P031X200005 - 2024, P031X230006 - 2024" Pass-Through Agency (if applicable) N/A Pass-Through Number(s) (if applicable) N/A Award Period 7/1/23 - 6/30/24 Compliance Requirement Affected Allowable Costs and Special Tests and Provisions Type of Finding Internal Control Significant Deficiency Document judgment for your assessment Control finding did not result in material questioned costs-therefore we will document as a SD. Additionally qualitatively failure did not have material impact on compliance. Compliance Not Material Document judgment for your assessment Not greater than 5% and not a systemic failure. Criteria or specific requirement "Per 2 CFR 200.430(g)(1)(vi), Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records should support the distribution of the employee's salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and non-Federal award; an indirect cost activity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities allocated using different allocation bases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity. Per 2 CFR 200.303, nonfederal entities receiving federal awards are required to establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with federal laws, regulations, and program compliance requirements." Condition The College did not have proper documentation of Time and Effort reporting. Questioned costs: N/A Known Likely Context During our testing of 40 Payroll transactions, we identified 8 time and effort reports that were not documented properly to track hours worked on federal grant and 12 reports that did not have a documentation of review. Additionally during our testing of 5 key personnel with Level of Effort provisions in the grant award notification, we identified 1 key personnel did not have documentation to track hours for level of effort required by the Federal agency. Cause The College did not have proper procedures in place to track time and effort for personnel on federal grants. Effect The College could potentially expense incorrect amount to federal grants. Repeat Finding No Recommendation "We recommend the College review policies and procedures to ensure all personnel on federal grants documented time and effort reports as stated in federal regulations. " Views of Responsible Officials Management agrees with this finding.
Federal Agency U.S. Department of Education Federal Program Name Higher Educational Institutional Aid Assistance Listing Number 84.031X Federal Award Identification Number and Year " P031X220005 - 2024, P031X200005 - 2024, P031X230006 - 2024" Pass-Through Agency (if applicable) N/A Pass-Through Number(s) (if applicable) N/A Award Period 7/1/23 - 6/30/24 Compliance Requirement Affected Allowable Costs and Special Tests and Provisions Type of Finding Internal Control Significant Deficiency Document judgment for your assessment Control finding did not result in material questioned costs-therefore we will document as a SD. Additionally qualitatively failure did not have material impact on compliance. Compliance Not Material Document judgment for your assessment Not greater than 5% and not a systemic failure. Criteria or specific requirement "Per 2 CFR 200.430(g)(1)(vi), Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records should support the distribution of the employee's salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and non-Federal award; an indirect cost activity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities allocated using different allocation bases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity. Per 2 CFR 200.303, nonfederal entities receiving federal awards are required to establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with federal laws, regulations, and program compliance requirements." Condition The College did not have proper documentation of Time and Effort reporting. Questioned costs: N/A Known Likely Context During our testing of 40 Payroll transactions, we identified 8 time and effort reports that were not documented properly to track hours worked on federal grant and 12 reports that did not have a documentation of review. Additionally during our testing of 5 key personnel with Level of Effort provisions in the grant award notification, we identified 1 key personnel did not have documentation to track hours for level of effort required by the Federal agency. Cause The College did not have proper procedures in place to track time and effort for personnel on federal grants. Effect The College could potentially expense incorrect amount to federal grants. Repeat Finding No Recommendation "We recommend the College review policies and procedures to ensure all personnel on federal grants documented time and effort reports as stated in federal regulations. " Views of Responsible Officials Management agrees with this finding.
Federal Agency U.S. Department of Education Federal Program Name Higher Educational Institutional Aid Assistance Listing Number 84.031X Federal Award Identification Number and Year " P031X220005 - 2024, P031X200005 - 2024, P031X230006 - 2024" Pass-Through Agency (if applicable) N/A Pass-Through Number(s) (if applicable) N/A Award Period 7/1/23 - 6/30/24 Compliance Requirement Affected Allowable Costs and Special Tests and Provisions Type of Finding Internal Control Significant Deficiency Document judgment for your assessment Control finding did not result in material questioned costs-therefore we will document as a SD. Additionally qualitatively failure did not have material impact on compliance. Compliance Not Material Document judgment for your assessment Not greater than 5% and not a systemic failure. Criteria or specific requirement "Per 2 CFR 200.430(g)(1)(vi), Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records should support the distribution of the employee's salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and non-Federal award; an indirect cost activity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities allocated using different allocation bases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity. Per 2 CFR 200.303, nonfederal entities receiving federal awards are required to establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with federal laws, regulations, and program compliance requirements." Condition The College did not have proper documentation of Time and Effort reporting. Questioned costs: N/A Known Likely Context During our testing of 40 Payroll transactions, we identified 8 time and effort reports that were not documented properly to track hours worked on federal grant and 12 reports that did not have a documentation of review. Additionally during our testing of 5 key personnel with Level of Effort provisions in the grant award notification, we identified 1 key personnel did not have documentation to track hours for level of effort required by the Federal agency. Cause The College did not have proper procedures in place to track time and effort for personnel on federal grants. Effect The College could potentially expense incorrect amount to federal grants. Repeat Finding No Recommendation "We recommend the College review policies and procedures to ensure all personnel on federal grants documented time and effort reports as stated in federal regulations. " Views of Responsible Officials Management agrees with this finding.
Federal Agency US Department of Education Federal Program Name Higher Education Institutional Aid Assistance Listing Number 84.031S Federal Award Identification Number and Year P031S200249 - 2024 Pass-Through Agency (if applicable) N/A Pass-Through Number(s) (if applicable) N/A Award Period 7/1/2023-6/30/2024 Compliance Requirement Affected Allowable Costs and Special Tests and Provisions Type of Finding Internal Control Significant Deficiency Document judgment for your assessment Control finding did not result in material known questioned costs-therefore we will document as a SD. Additionally the client provided narrative response documents that the project directors complete, but do not quantify actual hours charged to the grant. based on expenditure of grant funds and activities in narrative responses and performance reports the grant work is being adequately completed, but the quantified hour tracking is not present. As such, based on these factors we will consider this to be a significant deficiency. Compliance Not Material Document judgment for your assessment See line 28 for more detailed response Criteria or specific requirement "Per 2 CFR 200.430(g)(1)(vi), Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records should support the distribution of the employee's salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and non-Federal award; an indirect cost activity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities allocated using different allocation bases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity. Per 2 CFR 200.303, nonfederal entities receiving federal awards are required to establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with federal laws, regulations, and program compliance requirements." Condition The University did not have proper documentation of Time and Effort reporting. Questioned costs: N/A Known 12,965.60 Likely 333907.5 Context During our testing of 40 Payroll transactions, we identified 38 time and effort reports that were not documented properly to track hours worked on federal grant and did not have a documentation of review. Additionally during our testing of 1 key personnel with Level of Effort provisions in the grant award notification, we identified the key personnel did not have documentation to track hours for level of effort required by the Federal agency. Cause The University did not have proper procedures in place to track time and effort for personnel on federal grants. Effect The University could potentially expense incorrect amount to federal grants. Repeat Finding No Recommendation We recommend the University review policies and procedures to ensure all personnel on federal grants documented time and effort reports as stated in federal regulations. Views of Responsible Officials Agree
Finding Number 2024-007 Education Stabilization Fund: American Rescue Plan - Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER III) Assistance Listing Number 84.425U Allowable Costs/Cost Principles – Documentation of Employee Salary and Wage Rate Immaterial Noncompliance Criteria: Per Federal regulations 2 CFR section 200.430(i)(1)(vii), the School District must maintain time and effort distribution records for an employee who works in part on the consolidated administrative cost objective and in part on a federal program whose administrative funds have not been consolidated or on activities funded from other revenue sources. Condition: At the time of our testing, the School District did not maintain salary and wage approval agreement records for employees who were funded with ESSER Federal funds. Cause: Oversight. Effect: Time and effort reports were not completed. Questioned Costs: None. Recommendation: Salary and wage approval agreements should be completed throughout the year listing the employees name, position or job title, and salary rate signed by the employee’s supervisor. Management's Response and Corrective Actions: The Director of Finance completed salary and wage approval agreement records for the ESSER funds expended for fiscal year ending June 30, 2024 during audit fieldwork. Management has assigned the Director of Finance with the task of completing the required reports in a timely manner. The Superintendent will provide oversight of this requirement. Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Danielle Banasiak, Director of Finance, and Amiee Erfourth, Superintendent Completion Date: November 15, 2024
Criteria: Title I Schoolwide Programs (SWP) should always consider the following general criteria when approving activities or expenditures supported with Title I, Part A funds: • The activity and/or expenditure meets a need identified in the comprehensive needs assessment (ESSA Section 1114(b)(6); • The activity and/or expenditure is included in the approved Single Plan for Student Achievement (SPSA) (Education Code Section 64001(g)(C)(3); • The activity and/or expenditure has been reviewed, approved, and recommended by the School Site Council to the local governing board (Education Code Section 64001(d). Condition: Expenditure of Title I funds were not consistent with the SPSA templates. Questioned Cost: None. We determined that Title I, Part A funds were spent on student related services, and support teachers, whose payroll charges allocated to the Title I, Part A program were supported by time and effort distribution records in accordance with 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1)(vii). Context: The condition was noted at Wilson Elementary and Gridley High School. Effect: The District did not comply with Federal and State requirements related to Title I Schoolwide Programs. Cause: The District did not review the proposed expenditures of Title I funds to ensure that the expenditures were consistent with the budgets in the SPSA templates. Recommendation: The District should ensure that all proposed expenditures from Title I funds are consistent with the budgets in each school’s SPSA template prior to expenditure. District Response: Annually, the Director of Curriculum and Technology in capacity of accountability coordinator shall review all school site SPSAs prior to their final adoption by the governing board of the district and facilitate communication between school site principals and the business office to ensure congruence of the planned budget documents for the District and the SPSA documents for each school site. Should discrepancies be found, the Director shall facilitate with the site principals and the business office the needed corrections to bring the documents into agreement. Director shall also conduct as-needed training with site principals about SPSA components and their appropriate completion.
FAL No. and Name: 84.425U COVID-19 American Rescue Plan - Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ARP ESSER) 84.425W COVID-19 American Rescue Plan - Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief - Homeless Children and Youth Award Number: 21FESIII-110236-01A 22FARHOI-210236-01A 22FAHIIE-210236-01A Federal Agency: Arizona Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs Questioned Costs: None Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR §200.430(i)(1)(i), the School should have a system of internal control that provides reasonable assurance that employee compensation rates are accurate and properly verified. Condition and context: Two out of twenty-five employees tested were found to have been paid at a rate lower than what was documented in their personnel file. Cause: There appears to be insufficient review and verification procedures within the payroll processing system. Effect: This deficiency increases the risk of discrepancies in employee compensation, potentially leading to both overpayments and underpayments. Recommendation: To help ensure employees receive accurate compensation, the School should implement internal control procedures that include thorough verification of payroll data against authorized pay rates before payroll is processed. Management's Corrective Action Plan is included at the end of this report.
FAL No. and Name: 84.425U COVID-19 American Rescue Plan - Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ARP ESSER) 84.425W COVID-19 American Rescue Plan - Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief - Homeless Children and Youth Award Number: 21FESIII-110236-01A 22FARHOI-210236-01A 22FAHIIE-210236-01A Federal Agency: Arizona Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs Questioned Costs: None Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR §200.430(i)(1)(i), the School should have a system of internal control that provides reasonable assurance that employee compensation rates are accurate and properly verified. Condition and context: Two out of twenty-five employees tested were found to have been paid at a rate lower than what was documented in their personnel file. Cause: There appears to be insufficient review and verification procedures within the payroll processing system. Effect: This deficiency increases the risk of discrepancies in employee compensation, potentially leading to both overpayments and underpayments. Recommendation: To help ensure employees receive accurate compensation, the School should implement internal control procedures that include thorough verification of payroll data against authorized pay rates before payroll is processed. Management's Corrective Action Plan is included at the end of this report.