Finding 2024-007 Programs: All Material Weakness over Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) Reporting Repeat Finding: Yes; 2023-006 Condition: Finance is responsible for preparing the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards based upon grant information obtained from the financial accounting records and other information provided by each department or agency. In many instances, the detail expenditure information in the accounting software differed from the expenditures reported by various City departments. Additionally, expenditures related to sub-recipients, subcontractors, and beneficiaries are not adequately tracked in the general ledger. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.303, Internal controls: The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.508, Auditee responsibilities: The auditee must: (b) Prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards in accordance with §200.510 Financial statements. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.510, Financial statements: (b) Schedule of expenditures of Federal awards: the auditee must also prepare a schedule of expenditures of Federal awards for the period covered by the auditee’s financial statements which must include the total Federal awards expended as determined in accordance with §200.502 Basis for determining Federal awards expended. While not required, the auditee may choose to provide information requested by Federal awarding agencies and pass-through entities to make the schedule easier to use. For example, when a Federal program has multiple Federal award years, the auditee may list the amount of Federal awards expended for each Federal award year separately. At a minimum, the schedule must: (1) List individual Federal programs by Federal agency. For a cluster of programs, provide the cluster name, list individual Federal programs within the cluster of programs, and provide the applicable Federal agency name. For R&D, total Federal awards expended must be shown either by individual Federal award or by Federal agency and major subdivision within the Federal agency. (2) For Federal awards received as a subrecipient, the name of the pass-through entity and identifying number assigned by the pass-through entity must be included. (3) Provide total Federal awards expended for each individual Federal program and the AL number or other identifying number when the AL information is not available. For a cluster of programs, also provide the total for the cluster. (4) Include the total amount provided to subrecipients from each Federal program. (5) For loan or loan guarantee programs described in § 200.502(b), identify in the notes to the schedule the balances outstanding at the end of the audit period. This is in addition to including the total federal awards expended for loan or loan guarantee programs in the schedule; and (6) Include notes that describe that significant accounting policies used in preparing the schedule and note whether or not the non-Federal entity elected to use the 10% de minimis cost rate as covered in §200.414 Indirect (F&A) costs. Cause: The City does not maintain a centralized grant accounting function or standardized policies and procedures, including requirements to periodically submit and reconcile expenditures; instead, each department maintains its own grant information. The lack of submission of grant documents and accurate information by the various agencies and departments to Finance weakens internal controls over grant reporting and hinders the ability of Finance to accurately prepare the Schedule. Internal controls over financial reporting should be designed to prevent, detect or correct errors in a timely manner. Without adequate controls, the City cannot provide reasonable assurance that the Schedule is fairly presented. Controls have not been established by the City to ensure complete and accurate reporting for the Schedule for the 2024 fiscal year. Effect: The determination of which major programs will be audited is affected by the accuracy of the Schedule at the time of audit. Without proper internal controls over financial reporting, inaccurate reporting of the City’s financial information could occur, and the City cannot provide reasonable assurance that the SEFA is fairly presented. As a result, individual program reports throughout the year could have inaccurate information. There were also significant delays in the preparation of the Schedule of Federal awards, which prevented the City from meeting the March 31, 2025 deadline with the Federal clearinghouse. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend that Finance establish policies and procedures to ensure that the Federal funds are properly identified and reported accurately in the Schedule in accordance with Uniform Guidance requirements. We also recommend that individuals responsible for administering Federal assistance programs with the City receive training in grant administration. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Finding 2024-007 Programs: All Material Weakness over Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) Reporting Repeat Finding: Yes; 2023-006 Condition: Finance is responsible for preparing the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards based upon grant information obtained from the financial accounting records and other information provided by each department or agency. In many instances, the detail expenditure information in the accounting software differed from the expenditures reported by various City departments. Additionally, expenditures related to sub-recipients, subcontractors, and beneficiaries are not adequately tracked in the general ledger. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.303, Internal controls: The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.508, Auditee responsibilities: The auditee must: (b) Prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards in accordance with §200.510 Financial statements. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.510, Financial statements: (b) Schedule of expenditures of Federal awards: the auditee must also prepare a schedule of expenditures of Federal awards for the period covered by the auditee’s financial statements which must include the total Federal awards expended as determined in accordance with §200.502 Basis for determining Federal awards expended. While not required, the auditee may choose to provide information requested by Federal awarding agencies and pass-through entities to make the schedule easier to use. For example, when a Federal program has multiple Federal award years, the auditee may list the amount of Federal awards expended for each Federal award year separately. At a minimum, the schedule must: (1) List individual Federal programs by Federal agency. For a cluster of programs, provide the cluster name, list individual Federal programs within the cluster of programs, and provide the applicable Federal agency name. For R&D, total Federal awards expended must be shown either by individual Federal award or by Federal agency and major subdivision within the Federal agency. (2) For Federal awards received as a subrecipient, the name of the pass-through entity and identifying number assigned by the pass-through entity must be included. (3) Provide total Federal awards expended for each individual Federal program and the AL number or other identifying number when the AL information is not available. For a cluster of programs, also provide the total for the cluster. (4) Include the total amount provided to subrecipients from each Federal program. (5) For loan or loan guarantee programs described in § 200.502(b), identify in the notes to the schedule the balances outstanding at the end of the audit period. This is in addition to including the total federal awards expended for loan or loan guarantee programs in the schedule; and (6) Include notes that describe that significant accounting policies used in preparing the schedule and note whether or not the non-Federal entity elected to use the 10% de minimis cost rate as covered in §200.414 Indirect (F&A) costs. Cause: The City does not maintain a centralized grant accounting function or standardized policies and procedures, including requirements to periodically submit and reconcile expenditures; instead, each department maintains its own grant information. The lack of submission of grant documents and accurate information by the various agencies and departments to Finance weakens internal controls over grant reporting and hinders the ability of Finance to accurately prepare the Schedule. Internal controls over financial reporting should be designed to prevent, detect or correct errors in a timely manner. Without adequate controls, the City cannot provide reasonable assurance that the Schedule is fairly presented. Controls have not been established by the City to ensure complete and accurate reporting for the Schedule for the 2024 fiscal year. Effect: The determination of which major programs will be audited is affected by the accuracy of the Schedule at the time of audit. Without proper internal controls over financial reporting, inaccurate reporting of the City’s financial information could occur, and the City cannot provide reasonable assurance that the SEFA is fairly presented. As a result, individual program reports throughout the year could have inaccurate information. There were also significant delays in the preparation of the Schedule of Federal awards, which prevented the City from meeting the March 31, 2025 deadline with the Federal clearinghouse. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend that Finance establish policies and procedures to ensure that the Federal funds are properly identified and reported accurately in the Schedule in accordance with Uniform Guidance requirements. We also recommend that individuals responsible for administering Federal assistance programs with the City receive training in grant administration. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Finding 2024-007 Programs: All Material Weakness over Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) Reporting Repeat Finding: Yes; 2023-006 Condition: Finance is responsible for preparing the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards based upon grant information obtained from the financial accounting records and other information provided by each department or agency. In many instances, the detail expenditure information in the accounting software differed from the expenditures reported by various City departments. Additionally, expenditures related to sub-recipients, subcontractors, and beneficiaries are not adequately tracked in the general ledger. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.303, Internal controls: The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.508, Auditee responsibilities: The auditee must: (b) Prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards in accordance with §200.510 Financial statements. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.510, Financial statements: (b) Schedule of expenditures of Federal awards: the auditee must also prepare a schedule of expenditures of Federal awards for the period covered by the auditee’s financial statements which must include the total Federal awards expended as determined in accordance with §200.502 Basis for determining Federal awards expended. While not required, the auditee may choose to provide information requested by Federal awarding agencies and pass-through entities to make the schedule easier to use. For example, when a Federal program has multiple Federal award years, the auditee may list the amount of Federal awards expended for each Federal award year separately. At a minimum, the schedule must: (1) List individual Federal programs by Federal agency. For a cluster of programs, provide the cluster name, list individual Federal programs within the cluster of programs, and provide the applicable Federal agency name. For R&D, total Federal awards expended must be shown either by individual Federal award or by Federal agency and major subdivision within the Federal agency. (2) For Federal awards received as a subrecipient, the name of the pass-through entity and identifying number assigned by the pass-through entity must be included. (3) Provide total Federal awards expended for each individual Federal program and the AL number or other identifying number when the AL information is not available. For a cluster of programs, also provide the total for the cluster. (4) Include the total amount provided to subrecipients from each Federal program. (5) For loan or loan guarantee programs described in § 200.502(b), identify in the notes to the schedule the balances outstanding at the end of the audit period. This is in addition to including the total federal awards expended for loan or loan guarantee programs in the schedule; and (6) Include notes that describe that significant accounting policies used in preparing the schedule and note whether or not the non-Federal entity elected to use the 10% de minimis cost rate as covered in §200.414 Indirect (F&A) costs. Cause: The City does not maintain a centralized grant accounting function or standardized policies and procedures, including requirements to periodically submit and reconcile expenditures; instead, each department maintains its own grant information. The lack of submission of grant documents and accurate information by the various agencies and departments to Finance weakens internal controls over grant reporting and hinders the ability of Finance to accurately prepare the Schedule. Internal controls over financial reporting should be designed to prevent, detect or correct errors in a timely manner. Without adequate controls, the City cannot provide reasonable assurance that the Schedule is fairly presented. Controls have not been established by the City to ensure complete and accurate reporting for the Schedule for the 2024 fiscal year. Effect: The determination of which major programs will be audited is affected by the accuracy of the Schedule at the time of audit. Without proper internal controls over financial reporting, inaccurate reporting of the City’s financial information could occur, and the City cannot provide reasonable assurance that the SEFA is fairly presented. As a result, individual program reports throughout the year could have inaccurate information. There were also significant delays in the preparation of the Schedule of Federal awards, which prevented the City from meeting the March 31, 2025 deadline with the Federal clearinghouse. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend that Finance establish policies and procedures to ensure that the Federal funds are properly identified and reported accurately in the Schedule in accordance with Uniform Guidance requirements. We also recommend that individuals responsible for administering Federal assistance programs with the City receive training in grant administration. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Finding 2024-007 Programs: All Material Weakness over Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) Reporting Repeat Finding: Yes; 2023-006 Condition: Finance is responsible for preparing the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards based upon grant information obtained from the financial accounting records and other information provided by each department or agency. In many instances, the detail expenditure information in the accounting software differed from the expenditures reported by various City departments. Additionally, expenditures related to sub-recipients, subcontractors, and beneficiaries are not adequately tracked in the general ledger. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.303, Internal controls: The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.508, Auditee responsibilities: The auditee must: (b) Prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards in accordance with §200.510 Financial statements. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.510, Financial statements: (b) Schedule of expenditures of Federal awards: the auditee must also prepare a schedule of expenditures of Federal awards for the period covered by the auditee’s financial statements which must include the total Federal awards expended as determined in accordance with §200.502 Basis for determining Federal awards expended. While not required, the auditee may choose to provide information requested by Federal awarding agencies and pass-through entities to make the schedule easier to use. For example, when a Federal program has multiple Federal award years, the auditee may list the amount of Federal awards expended for each Federal award year separately. At a minimum, the schedule must: (1) List individual Federal programs by Federal agency. For a cluster of programs, provide the cluster name, list individual Federal programs within the cluster of programs, and provide the applicable Federal agency name. For R&D, total Federal awards expended must be shown either by individual Federal award or by Federal agency and major subdivision within the Federal agency. (2) For Federal awards received as a subrecipient, the name of the pass-through entity and identifying number assigned by the pass-through entity must be included. (3) Provide total Federal awards expended for each individual Federal program and the AL number or other identifying number when the AL information is not available. For a cluster of programs, also provide the total for the cluster. (4) Include the total amount provided to subrecipients from each Federal program. (5) For loan or loan guarantee programs described in § 200.502(b), identify in the notes to the schedule the balances outstanding at the end of the audit period. This is in addition to including the total federal awards expended for loan or loan guarantee programs in the schedule; and (6) Include notes that describe that significant accounting policies used in preparing the schedule and note whether or not the non-Federal entity elected to use the 10% de minimis cost rate as covered in §200.414 Indirect (F&A) costs. Cause: The City does not maintain a centralized grant accounting function or standardized policies and procedures, including requirements to periodically submit and reconcile expenditures; instead, each department maintains its own grant information. The lack of submission of grant documents and accurate information by the various agencies and departments to Finance weakens internal controls over grant reporting and hinders the ability of Finance to accurately prepare the Schedule. Internal controls over financial reporting should be designed to prevent, detect or correct errors in a timely manner. Without adequate controls, the City cannot provide reasonable assurance that the Schedule is fairly presented. Controls have not been established by the City to ensure complete and accurate reporting for the Schedule for the 2024 fiscal year. Effect: The determination of which major programs will be audited is affected by the accuracy of the Schedule at the time of audit. Without proper internal controls over financial reporting, inaccurate reporting of the City’s financial information could occur, and the City cannot provide reasonable assurance that the SEFA is fairly presented. As a result, individual program reports throughout the year could have inaccurate information. There were also significant delays in the preparation of the Schedule of Federal awards, which prevented the City from meeting the March 31, 2025 deadline with the Federal clearinghouse. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend that Finance establish policies and procedures to ensure that the Federal funds are properly identified and reported accurately in the Schedule in accordance with Uniform Guidance requirements. We also recommend that individuals responsible for administering Federal assistance programs with the City receive training in grant administration. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Finding 2024-007 Programs: All Material Weakness over Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) Reporting Repeat Finding: Yes; 2023-006 Condition: Finance is responsible for preparing the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards based upon grant information obtained from the financial accounting records and other information provided by each department or agency. In many instances, the detail expenditure information in the accounting software differed from the expenditures reported by various City departments. Additionally, expenditures related to sub-recipients, subcontractors, and beneficiaries are not adequately tracked in the general ledger. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.303, Internal controls: The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.508, Auditee responsibilities: The auditee must: (b) Prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards in accordance with §200.510 Financial statements. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.510, Financial statements: (b) Schedule of expenditures of Federal awards: the auditee must also prepare a schedule of expenditures of Federal awards for the period covered by the auditee’s financial statements which must include the total Federal awards expended as determined in accordance with §200.502 Basis for determining Federal awards expended. While not required, the auditee may choose to provide information requested by Federal awarding agencies and pass-through entities to make the schedule easier to use. For example, when a Federal program has multiple Federal award years, the auditee may list the amount of Federal awards expended for each Federal award year separately. At a minimum, the schedule must: (1) List individual Federal programs by Federal agency. For a cluster of programs, provide the cluster name, list individual Federal programs within the cluster of programs, and provide the applicable Federal agency name. For R&D, total Federal awards expended must be shown either by individual Federal award or by Federal agency and major subdivision within the Federal agency. (2) For Federal awards received as a subrecipient, the name of the pass-through entity and identifying number assigned by the pass-through entity must be included. (3) Provide total Federal awards expended for each individual Federal program and the AL number or other identifying number when the AL information is not available. For a cluster of programs, also provide the total for the cluster. (4) Include the total amount provided to subrecipients from each Federal program. (5) For loan or loan guarantee programs described in § 200.502(b), identify in the notes to the schedule the balances outstanding at the end of the audit period. This is in addition to including the total federal awards expended for loan or loan guarantee programs in the schedule; and (6) Include notes that describe that significant accounting policies used in preparing the schedule and note whether or not the non-Federal entity elected to use the 10% de minimis cost rate as covered in §200.414 Indirect (F&A) costs. Cause: The City does not maintain a centralized grant accounting function or standardized policies and procedures, including requirements to periodically submit and reconcile expenditures; instead, each department maintains its own grant information. The lack of submission of grant documents and accurate information by the various agencies and departments to Finance weakens internal controls over grant reporting and hinders the ability of Finance to accurately prepare the Schedule. Internal controls over financial reporting should be designed to prevent, detect or correct errors in a timely manner. Without adequate controls, the City cannot provide reasonable assurance that the Schedule is fairly presented. Controls have not been established by the City to ensure complete and accurate reporting for the Schedule for the 2024 fiscal year. Effect: The determination of which major programs will be audited is affected by the accuracy of the Schedule at the time of audit. Without proper internal controls over financial reporting, inaccurate reporting of the City’s financial information could occur, and the City cannot provide reasonable assurance that the SEFA is fairly presented. As a result, individual program reports throughout the year could have inaccurate information. There were also significant delays in the preparation of the Schedule of Federal awards, which prevented the City from meeting the March 31, 2025 deadline with the Federal clearinghouse. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend that Finance establish policies and procedures to ensure that the Federal funds are properly identified and reported accurately in the Schedule in accordance with Uniform Guidance requirements. We also recommend that individuals responsible for administering Federal assistance programs with the City receive training in grant administration. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Finding 2024-007 Programs: All Material Weakness over Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) Reporting Repeat Finding: Yes; 2023-006 Condition: Finance is responsible for preparing the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards based upon grant information obtained from the financial accounting records and other information provided by each department or agency. In many instances, the detail expenditure information in the accounting software differed from the expenditures reported by various City departments. Additionally, expenditures related to sub-recipients, subcontractors, and beneficiaries are not adequately tracked in the general ledger. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.303, Internal controls: The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.508, Auditee responsibilities: The auditee must: (b) Prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards in accordance with §200.510 Financial statements. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.510, Financial statements: (b) Schedule of expenditures of Federal awards: the auditee must also prepare a schedule of expenditures of Federal awards for the period covered by the auditee’s financial statements which must include the total Federal awards expended as determined in accordance with §200.502 Basis for determining Federal awards expended. While not required, the auditee may choose to provide information requested by Federal awarding agencies and pass-through entities to make the schedule easier to use. For example, when a Federal program has multiple Federal award years, the auditee may list the amount of Federal awards expended for each Federal award year separately. At a minimum, the schedule must: (1) List individual Federal programs by Federal agency. For a cluster of programs, provide the cluster name, list individual Federal programs within the cluster of programs, and provide the applicable Federal agency name. For R&D, total Federal awards expended must be shown either by individual Federal award or by Federal agency and major subdivision within the Federal agency. (2) For Federal awards received as a subrecipient, the name of the pass-through entity and identifying number assigned by the pass-through entity must be included. (3) Provide total Federal awards expended for each individual Federal program and the AL number or other identifying number when the AL information is not available. For a cluster of programs, also provide the total for the cluster. (4) Include the total amount provided to subrecipients from each Federal program. (5) For loan or loan guarantee programs described in § 200.502(b), identify in the notes to the schedule the balances outstanding at the end of the audit period. This is in addition to including the total federal awards expended for loan or loan guarantee programs in the schedule; and (6) Include notes that describe that significant accounting policies used in preparing the schedule and note whether or not the non-Federal entity elected to use the 10% de minimis cost rate as covered in §200.414 Indirect (F&A) costs. Cause: The City does not maintain a centralized grant accounting function or standardized policies and procedures, including requirements to periodically submit and reconcile expenditures; instead, each department maintains its own grant information. The lack of submission of grant documents and accurate information by the various agencies and departments to Finance weakens internal controls over grant reporting and hinders the ability of Finance to accurately prepare the Schedule. Internal controls over financial reporting should be designed to prevent, detect or correct errors in a timely manner. Without adequate controls, the City cannot provide reasonable assurance that the Schedule is fairly presented. Controls have not been established by the City to ensure complete and accurate reporting for the Schedule for the 2024 fiscal year. Effect: The determination of which major programs will be audited is affected by the accuracy of the Schedule at the time of audit. Without proper internal controls over financial reporting, inaccurate reporting of the City’s financial information could occur, and the City cannot provide reasonable assurance that the SEFA is fairly presented. As a result, individual program reports throughout the year could have inaccurate information. There were also significant delays in the preparation of the Schedule of Federal awards, which prevented the City from meeting the March 31, 2025 deadline with the Federal clearinghouse. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend that Finance establish policies and procedures to ensure that the Federal funds are properly identified and reported accurately in the Schedule in accordance with Uniform Guidance requirements. We also recommend that individuals responsible for administering Federal assistance programs with the City receive training in grant administration. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Finding 2024-007 Programs: All Material Weakness over Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) Reporting Repeat Finding: Yes; 2023-006 Condition: Finance is responsible for preparing the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards based upon grant information obtained from the financial accounting records and other information provided by each department or agency. In many instances, the detail expenditure information in the accounting software differed from the expenditures reported by various City departments. Additionally, expenditures related to sub-recipients, subcontractors, and beneficiaries are not adequately tracked in the general ledger. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.303, Internal controls: The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.508, Auditee responsibilities: The auditee must: (b) Prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards in accordance with §200.510 Financial statements. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.510, Financial statements: (b) Schedule of expenditures of Federal awards: the auditee must also prepare a schedule of expenditures of Federal awards for the period covered by the auditee’s financial statements which must include the total Federal awards expended as determined in accordance with §200.502 Basis for determining Federal awards expended. While not required, the auditee may choose to provide information requested by Federal awarding agencies and pass-through entities to make the schedule easier to use. For example, when a Federal program has multiple Federal award years, the auditee may list the amount of Federal awards expended for each Federal award year separately. At a minimum, the schedule must: (1) List individual Federal programs by Federal agency. For a cluster of programs, provide the cluster name, list individual Federal programs within the cluster of programs, and provide the applicable Federal agency name. For R&D, total Federal awards expended must be shown either by individual Federal award or by Federal agency and major subdivision within the Federal agency. (2) For Federal awards received as a subrecipient, the name of the pass-through entity and identifying number assigned by the pass-through entity must be included. (3) Provide total Federal awards expended for each individual Federal program and the AL number or other identifying number when the AL information is not available. For a cluster of programs, also provide the total for the cluster. (4) Include the total amount provided to subrecipients from each Federal program. (5) For loan or loan guarantee programs described in § 200.502(b), identify in the notes to the schedule the balances outstanding at the end of the audit period. This is in addition to including the total federal awards expended for loan or loan guarantee programs in the schedule; and (6) Include notes that describe that significant accounting policies used in preparing the schedule and note whether or not the non-Federal entity elected to use the 10% de minimis cost rate as covered in §200.414 Indirect (F&A) costs. Cause: The City does not maintain a centralized grant accounting function or standardized policies and procedures, including requirements to periodically submit and reconcile expenditures; instead, each department maintains its own grant information. The lack of submission of grant documents and accurate information by the various agencies and departments to Finance weakens internal controls over grant reporting and hinders the ability of Finance to accurately prepare the Schedule. Internal controls over financial reporting should be designed to prevent, detect or correct errors in a timely manner. Without adequate controls, the City cannot provide reasonable assurance that the Schedule is fairly presented. Controls have not been established by the City to ensure complete and accurate reporting for the Schedule for the 2024 fiscal year. Effect: The determination of which major programs will be audited is affected by the accuracy of the Schedule at the time of audit. Without proper internal controls over financial reporting, inaccurate reporting of the City’s financial information could occur, and the City cannot provide reasonable assurance that the SEFA is fairly presented. As a result, individual program reports throughout the year could have inaccurate information. There were also significant delays in the preparation of the Schedule of Federal awards, which prevented the City from meeting the March 31, 2025 deadline with the Federal clearinghouse. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend that Finance establish policies and procedures to ensure that the Federal funds are properly identified and reported accurately in the Schedule in accordance with Uniform Guidance requirements. We also recommend that individuals responsible for administering Federal assistance programs with the City receive training in grant administration. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Finding 2024-007 Programs: All Material Weakness over Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) Reporting Repeat Finding: Yes; 2023-006 Condition: Finance is responsible for preparing the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards based upon grant information obtained from the financial accounting records and other information provided by each department or agency. In many instances, the detail expenditure information in the accounting software differed from the expenditures reported by various City departments. Additionally, expenditures related to sub-recipients, subcontractors, and beneficiaries are not adequately tracked in the general ledger. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.303, Internal controls: The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.508, Auditee responsibilities: The auditee must: (b) Prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards in accordance with §200.510 Financial statements. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.510, Financial statements: (b) Schedule of expenditures of Federal awards: the auditee must also prepare a schedule of expenditures of Federal awards for the period covered by the auditee’s financial statements which must include the total Federal awards expended as determined in accordance with §200.502 Basis for determining Federal awards expended. While not required, the auditee may choose to provide information requested by Federal awarding agencies and pass-through entities to make the schedule easier to use. For example, when a Federal program has multiple Federal award years, the auditee may list the amount of Federal awards expended for each Federal award year separately. At a minimum, the schedule must: (1) List individual Federal programs by Federal agency. For a cluster of programs, provide the cluster name, list individual Federal programs within the cluster of programs, and provide the applicable Federal agency name. For R&D, total Federal awards expended must be shown either by individual Federal award or by Federal agency and major subdivision within the Federal agency. (2) For Federal awards received as a subrecipient, the name of the pass-through entity and identifying number assigned by the pass-through entity must be included. (3) Provide total Federal awards expended for each individual Federal program and the AL number or other identifying number when the AL information is not available. For a cluster of programs, also provide the total for the cluster. (4) Include the total amount provided to subrecipients from each Federal program. (5) For loan or loan guarantee programs described in § 200.502(b), identify in the notes to the schedule the balances outstanding at the end of the audit period. This is in addition to including the total federal awards expended for loan or loan guarantee programs in the schedule; and (6) Include notes that describe that significant accounting policies used in preparing the schedule and note whether or not the non-Federal entity elected to use the 10% de minimis cost rate as covered in §200.414 Indirect (F&A) costs. Cause: The City does not maintain a centralized grant accounting function or standardized policies and procedures, including requirements to periodically submit and reconcile expenditures; instead, each department maintains its own grant information. The lack of submission of grant documents and accurate information by the various agencies and departments to Finance weakens internal controls over grant reporting and hinders the ability of Finance to accurately prepare the Schedule. Internal controls over financial reporting should be designed to prevent, detect or correct errors in a timely manner. Without adequate controls, the City cannot provide reasonable assurance that the Schedule is fairly presented. Controls have not been established by the City to ensure complete and accurate reporting for the Schedule for the 2024 fiscal year. Effect: The determination of which major programs will be audited is affected by the accuracy of the Schedule at the time of audit. Without proper internal controls over financial reporting, inaccurate reporting of the City’s financial information could occur, and the City cannot provide reasonable assurance that the SEFA is fairly presented. As a result, individual program reports throughout the year could have inaccurate information. There were also significant delays in the preparation of the Schedule of Federal awards, which prevented the City from meeting the March 31, 2025 deadline with the Federal clearinghouse. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend that Finance establish policies and procedures to ensure that the Federal funds are properly identified and reported accurately in the Schedule in accordance with Uniform Guidance requirements. We also recommend that individuals responsible for administering Federal assistance programs with the City receive training in grant administration. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Finding 2024-007 Programs: All Material Weakness over Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) Reporting Repeat Finding: Yes; 2023-006 Condition: Finance is responsible for preparing the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards based upon grant information obtained from the financial accounting records and other information provided by each department or agency. In many instances, the detail expenditure information in the accounting software differed from the expenditures reported by various City departments. Additionally, expenditures related to sub-recipients, subcontractors, and beneficiaries are not adequately tracked in the general ledger. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.303, Internal controls: The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.508, Auditee responsibilities: The auditee must: (b) Prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards in accordance with §200.510 Financial statements. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.510, Financial statements: (b) Schedule of expenditures of Federal awards: the auditee must also prepare a schedule of expenditures of Federal awards for the period covered by the auditee’s financial statements which must include the total Federal awards expended as determined in accordance with §200.502 Basis for determining Federal awards expended. While not required, the auditee may choose to provide information requested by Federal awarding agencies and pass-through entities to make the schedule easier to use. For example, when a Federal program has multiple Federal award years, the auditee may list the amount of Federal awards expended for each Federal award year separately. At a minimum, the schedule must: (1) List individual Federal programs by Federal agency. For a cluster of programs, provide the cluster name, list individual Federal programs within the cluster of programs, and provide the applicable Federal agency name. For R&D, total Federal awards expended must be shown either by individual Federal award or by Federal agency and major subdivision within the Federal agency. (2) For Federal awards received as a subrecipient, the name of the pass-through entity and identifying number assigned by the pass-through entity must be included. (3) Provide total Federal awards expended for each individual Federal program and the AL number or other identifying number when the AL information is not available. For a cluster of programs, also provide the total for the cluster. (4) Include the total amount provided to subrecipients from each Federal program. (5) For loan or loan guarantee programs described in § 200.502(b), identify in the notes to the schedule the balances outstanding at the end of the audit period. This is in addition to including the total federal awards expended for loan or loan guarantee programs in the schedule; and (6) Include notes that describe that significant accounting policies used in preparing the schedule and note whether or not the non-Federal entity elected to use the 10% de minimis cost rate as covered in §200.414 Indirect (F&A) costs. Cause: The City does not maintain a centralized grant accounting function or standardized policies and procedures, including requirements to periodically submit and reconcile expenditures; instead, each department maintains its own grant information. The lack of submission of grant documents and accurate information by the various agencies and departments to Finance weakens internal controls over grant reporting and hinders the ability of Finance to accurately prepare the Schedule. Internal controls over financial reporting should be designed to prevent, detect or correct errors in a timely manner. Without adequate controls, the City cannot provide reasonable assurance that the Schedule is fairly presented. Controls have not been established by the City to ensure complete and accurate reporting for the Schedule for the 2024 fiscal year. Effect: The determination of which major programs will be audited is affected by the accuracy of the Schedule at the time of audit. Without proper internal controls over financial reporting, inaccurate reporting of the City’s financial information could occur, and the City cannot provide reasonable assurance that the SEFA is fairly presented. As a result, individual program reports throughout the year could have inaccurate information. There were also significant delays in the preparation of the Schedule of Federal awards, which prevented the City from meeting the March 31, 2025 deadline with the Federal clearinghouse. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend that Finance establish policies and procedures to ensure that the Federal funds are properly identified and reported accurately in the Schedule in accordance with Uniform Guidance requirements. We also recommend that individuals responsible for administering Federal assistance programs with the City receive training in grant administration. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Finding 2024-007 Programs: All Material Weakness over Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) Reporting Repeat Finding: Yes; 2023-006 Condition: Finance is responsible for preparing the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards based upon grant information obtained from the financial accounting records and other information provided by each department or agency. In many instances, the detail expenditure information in the accounting software differed from the expenditures reported by various City departments. Additionally, expenditures related to sub-recipients, subcontractors, and beneficiaries are not adequately tracked in the general ledger. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.303, Internal controls: The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.508, Auditee responsibilities: The auditee must: (b) Prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards in accordance with §200.510 Financial statements. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.510, Financial statements: (b) Schedule of expenditures of Federal awards: the auditee must also prepare a schedule of expenditures of Federal awards for the period covered by the auditee’s financial statements which must include the total Federal awards expended as determined in accordance with §200.502 Basis for determining Federal awards expended. While not required, the auditee may choose to provide information requested by Federal awarding agencies and pass-through entities to make the schedule easier to use. For example, when a Federal program has multiple Federal award years, the auditee may list the amount of Federal awards expended for each Federal award year separately. At a minimum, the schedule must: (1) List individual Federal programs by Federal agency. For a cluster of programs, provide the cluster name, list individual Federal programs within the cluster of programs, and provide the applicable Federal agency name. For R&D, total Federal awards expended must be shown either by individual Federal award or by Federal agency and major subdivision within the Federal agency. (2) For Federal awards received as a subrecipient, the name of the pass-through entity and identifying number assigned by the pass-through entity must be included. (3) Provide total Federal awards expended for each individual Federal program and the AL number or other identifying number when the AL information is not available. For a cluster of programs, also provide the total for the cluster. (4) Include the total amount provided to subrecipients from each Federal program. (5) For loan or loan guarantee programs described in § 200.502(b), identify in the notes to the schedule the balances outstanding at the end of the audit period. This is in addition to including the total federal awards expended for loan or loan guarantee programs in the schedule; and (6) Include notes that describe that significant accounting policies used in preparing the schedule and note whether or not the non-Federal entity elected to use the 10% de minimis cost rate as covered in §200.414 Indirect (F&A) costs. Cause: The City does not maintain a centralized grant accounting function or standardized policies and procedures, including requirements to periodically submit and reconcile expenditures; instead, each department maintains its own grant information. The lack of submission of grant documents and accurate information by the various agencies and departments to Finance weakens internal controls over grant reporting and hinders the ability of Finance to accurately prepare the Schedule. Internal controls over financial reporting should be designed to prevent, detect or correct errors in a timely manner. Without adequate controls, the City cannot provide reasonable assurance that the Schedule is fairly presented. Controls have not been established by the City to ensure complete and accurate reporting for the Schedule for the 2024 fiscal year. Effect: The determination of which major programs will be audited is affected by the accuracy of the Schedule at the time of audit. Without proper internal controls over financial reporting, inaccurate reporting of the City’s financial information could occur, and the City cannot provide reasonable assurance that the SEFA is fairly presented. As a result, individual program reports throughout the year could have inaccurate information. There were also significant delays in the preparation of the Schedule of Federal awards, which prevented the City from meeting the March 31, 2025 deadline with the Federal clearinghouse. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend that Finance establish policies and procedures to ensure that the Federal funds are properly identified and reported accurately in the Schedule in accordance with Uniform Guidance requirements. We also recommend that individuals responsible for administering Federal assistance programs with the City receive training in grant administration. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Finding 2024-007 Programs: All Material Weakness over Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) Reporting Repeat Finding: Yes; 2023-006 Condition: Finance is responsible for preparing the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards based upon grant information obtained from the financial accounting records and other information provided by each department or agency. In many instances, the detail expenditure information in the accounting software differed from the expenditures reported by various City departments. Additionally, expenditures related to sub-recipients, subcontractors, and beneficiaries are not adequately tracked in the general ledger. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.303, Internal controls: The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.508, Auditee responsibilities: The auditee must: (b) Prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards in accordance with §200.510 Financial statements. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.510, Financial statements: (b) Schedule of expenditures of Federal awards: the auditee must also prepare a schedule of expenditures of Federal awards for the period covered by the auditee’s financial statements which must include the total Federal awards expended as determined in accordance with §200.502 Basis for determining Federal awards expended. While not required, the auditee may choose to provide information requested by Federal awarding agencies and pass-through entities to make the schedule easier to use. For example, when a Federal program has multiple Federal award years, the auditee may list the amount of Federal awards expended for each Federal award year separately. At a minimum, the schedule must: (1) List individual Federal programs by Federal agency. For a cluster of programs, provide the cluster name, list individual Federal programs within the cluster of programs, and provide the applicable Federal agency name. For R&D, total Federal awards expended must be shown either by individual Federal award or by Federal agency and major subdivision within the Federal agency. (2) For Federal awards received as a subrecipient, the name of the pass-through entity and identifying number assigned by the pass-through entity must be included. (3) Provide total Federal awards expended for each individual Federal program and the AL number or other identifying number when the AL information is not available. For a cluster of programs, also provide the total for the cluster. (4) Include the total amount provided to subrecipients from each Federal program. (5) For loan or loan guarantee programs described in § 200.502(b), identify in the notes to the schedule the balances outstanding at the end of the audit period. This is in addition to including the total federal awards expended for loan or loan guarantee programs in the schedule; and (6) Include notes that describe that significant accounting policies used in preparing the schedule and note whether or not the non-Federal entity elected to use the 10% de minimis cost rate as covered in §200.414 Indirect (F&A) costs. Cause: The City does not maintain a centralized grant accounting function or standardized policies and procedures, including requirements to periodically submit and reconcile expenditures; instead, each department maintains its own grant information. The lack of submission of grant documents and accurate information by the various agencies and departments to Finance weakens internal controls over grant reporting and hinders the ability of Finance to accurately prepare the Schedule. Internal controls over financial reporting should be designed to prevent, detect or correct errors in a timely manner. Without adequate controls, the City cannot provide reasonable assurance that the Schedule is fairly presented. Controls have not been established by the City to ensure complete and accurate reporting for the Schedule for the 2024 fiscal year. Effect: The determination of which major programs will be audited is affected by the accuracy of the Schedule at the time of audit. Without proper internal controls over financial reporting, inaccurate reporting of the City’s financial information could occur, and the City cannot provide reasonable assurance that the SEFA is fairly presented. As a result, individual program reports throughout the year could have inaccurate information. There were also significant delays in the preparation of the Schedule of Federal awards, which prevented the City from meeting the March 31, 2025 deadline with the Federal clearinghouse. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend that Finance establish policies and procedures to ensure that the Federal funds are properly identified and reported accurately in the Schedule in accordance with Uniform Guidance requirements. We also recommend that individuals responsible for administering Federal assistance programs with the City receive training in grant administration. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Finding 2024-007 Programs: All Material Weakness over Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) Reporting Repeat Finding: Yes; 2023-006 Condition: Finance is responsible for preparing the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards based upon grant information obtained from the financial accounting records and other information provided by each department or agency. In many instances, the detail expenditure information in the accounting software differed from the expenditures reported by various City departments. Additionally, expenditures related to sub-recipients, subcontractors, and beneficiaries are not adequately tracked in the general ledger. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.303, Internal controls: The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.508, Auditee responsibilities: The auditee must: (b) Prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards in accordance with §200.510 Financial statements. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.510, Financial statements: (b) Schedule of expenditures of Federal awards: the auditee must also prepare a schedule of expenditures of Federal awards for the period covered by the auditee’s financial statements which must include the total Federal awards expended as determined in accordance with §200.502 Basis for determining Federal awards expended. While not required, the auditee may choose to provide information requested by Federal awarding agencies and pass-through entities to make the schedule easier to use. For example, when a Federal program has multiple Federal award years, the auditee may list the amount of Federal awards expended for each Federal award year separately. At a minimum, the schedule must: (1) List individual Federal programs by Federal agency. For a cluster of programs, provide the cluster name, list individual Federal programs within the cluster of programs, and provide the applicable Federal agency name. For R&D, total Federal awards expended must be shown either by individual Federal award or by Federal agency and major subdivision within the Federal agency. (2) For Federal awards received as a subrecipient, the name of the pass-through entity and identifying number assigned by the pass-through entity must be included. (3) Provide total Federal awards expended for each individual Federal program and the AL number or other identifying number when the AL information is not available. For a cluster of programs, also provide the total for the cluster. (4) Include the total amount provided to subrecipients from each Federal program. (5) For loan or loan guarantee programs described in § 200.502(b), identify in the notes to the schedule the balances outstanding at the end of the audit period. This is in addition to including the total federal awards expended for loan or loan guarantee programs in the schedule; and (6) Include notes that describe that significant accounting policies used in preparing the schedule and note whether or not the non-Federal entity elected to use the 10% de minimis cost rate as covered in §200.414 Indirect (F&A) costs. Cause: The City does not maintain a centralized grant accounting function or standardized policies and procedures, including requirements to periodically submit and reconcile expenditures; instead, each department maintains its own grant information. The lack of submission of grant documents and accurate information by the various agencies and departments to Finance weakens internal controls over grant reporting and hinders the ability of Finance to accurately prepare the Schedule. Internal controls over financial reporting should be designed to prevent, detect or correct errors in a timely manner. Without adequate controls, the City cannot provide reasonable assurance that the Schedule is fairly presented. Controls have not been established by the City to ensure complete and accurate reporting for the Schedule for the 2024 fiscal year. Effect: The determination of which major programs will be audited is affected by the accuracy of the Schedule at the time of audit. Without proper internal controls over financial reporting, inaccurate reporting of the City’s financial information could occur, and the City cannot provide reasonable assurance that the SEFA is fairly presented. As a result, individual program reports throughout the year could have inaccurate information. There were also significant delays in the preparation of the Schedule of Federal awards, which prevented the City from meeting the March 31, 2025 deadline with the Federal clearinghouse. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend that Finance establish policies and procedures to ensure that the Federal funds are properly identified and reported accurately in the Schedule in accordance with Uniform Guidance requirements. We also recommend that individuals responsible for administering Federal assistance programs with the City receive training in grant administration. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Finding 2024-007 Programs: All Material Weakness over Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) Reporting Repeat Finding: Yes; 2023-006 Condition: Finance is responsible for preparing the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards based upon grant information obtained from the financial accounting records and other information provided by each department or agency. In many instances, the detail expenditure information in the accounting software differed from the expenditures reported by various City departments. Additionally, expenditures related to sub-recipients, subcontractors, and beneficiaries are not adequately tracked in the general ledger. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.303, Internal controls: The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.508, Auditee responsibilities: The auditee must: (b) Prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards in accordance with §200.510 Financial statements. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.510, Financial statements: (b) Schedule of expenditures of Federal awards: the auditee must also prepare a schedule of expenditures of Federal awards for the period covered by the auditee’s financial statements which must include the total Federal awards expended as determined in accordance with §200.502 Basis for determining Federal awards expended. While not required, the auditee may choose to provide information requested by Federal awarding agencies and pass-through entities to make the schedule easier to use. For example, when a Federal program has multiple Federal award years, the auditee may list the amount of Federal awards expended for each Federal award year separately. At a minimum, the schedule must: (1) List individual Federal programs by Federal agency. For a cluster of programs, provide the cluster name, list individual Federal programs within the cluster of programs, and provide the applicable Federal agency name. For R&D, total Federal awards expended must be shown either by individual Federal award or by Federal agency and major subdivision within the Federal agency. (2) For Federal awards received as a subrecipient, the name of the pass-through entity and identifying number assigned by the pass-through entity must be included. (3) Provide total Federal awards expended for each individual Federal program and the AL number or other identifying number when the AL information is not available. For a cluster of programs, also provide the total for the cluster. (4) Include the total amount provided to subrecipients from each Federal program. (5) For loan or loan guarantee programs described in § 200.502(b), identify in the notes to the schedule the balances outstanding at the end of the audit period. This is in addition to including the total federal awards expended for loan or loan guarantee programs in the schedule; and (6) Include notes that describe that significant accounting policies used in preparing the schedule and note whether or not the non-Federal entity elected to use the 10% de minimis cost rate as covered in §200.414 Indirect (F&A) costs. Cause: The City does not maintain a centralized grant accounting function or standardized policies and procedures, including requirements to periodically submit and reconcile expenditures; instead, each department maintains its own grant information. The lack of submission of grant documents and accurate information by the various agencies and departments to Finance weakens internal controls over grant reporting and hinders the ability of Finance to accurately prepare the Schedule. Internal controls over financial reporting should be designed to prevent, detect or correct errors in a timely manner. Without adequate controls, the City cannot provide reasonable assurance that the Schedule is fairly presented. Controls have not been established by the City to ensure complete and accurate reporting for the Schedule for the 2024 fiscal year. Effect: The determination of which major programs will be audited is affected by the accuracy of the Schedule at the time of audit. Without proper internal controls over financial reporting, inaccurate reporting of the City’s financial information could occur, and the City cannot provide reasonable assurance that the SEFA is fairly presented. As a result, individual program reports throughout the year could have inaccurate information. There were also significant delays in the preparation of the Schedule of Federal awards, which prevented the City from meeting the March 31, 2025 deadline with the Federal clearinghouse. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend that Finance establish policies and procedures to ensure that the Federal funds are properly identified and reported accurately in the Schedule in accordance with Uniform Guidance requirements. We also recommend that individuals responsible for administering Federal assistance programs with the City receive training in grant administration. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Finding 2024-007 Programs: All Material Weakness over Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) Reporting Repeat Finding: Yes; 2023-006 Condition: Finance is responsible for preparing the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards based upon grant information obtained from the financial accounting records and other information provided by each department or agency. In many instances, the detail expenditure information in the accounting software differed from the expenditures reported by various City departments. Additionally, expenditures related to sub-recipients, subcontractors, and beneficiaries are not adequately tracked in the general ledger. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.303, Internal controls: The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.508, Auditee responsibilities: The auditee must: (b) Prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards in accordance with §200.510 Financial statements. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.510, Financial statements: (b) Schedule of expenditures of Federal awards: the auditee must also prepare a schedule of expenditures of Federal awards for the period covered by the auditee’s financial statements which must include the total Federal awards expended as determined in accordance with §200.502 Basis for determining Federal awards expended. While not required, the auditee may choose to provide information requested by Federal awarding agencies and pass-through entities to make the schedule easier to use. For example, when a Federal program has multiple Federal award years, the auditee may list the amount of Federal awards expended for each Federal award year separately. At a minimum, the schedule must: (1) List individual Federal programs by Federal agency. For a cluster of programs, provide the cluster name, list individual Federal programs within the cluster of programs, and provide the applicable Federal agency name. For R&D, total Federal awards expended must be shown either by individual Federal award or by Federal agency and major subdivision within the Federal agency. (2) For Federal awards received as a subrecipient, the name of the pass-through entity and identifying number assigned by the pass-through entity must be included. (3) Provide total Federal awards expended for each individual Federal program and the AL number or other identifying number when the AL information is not available. For a cluster of programs, also provide the total for the cluster. (4) Include the total amount provided to subrecipients from each Federal program. (5) For loan or loan guarantee programs described in § 200.502(b), identify in the notes to the schedule the balances outstanding at the end of the audit period. This is in addition to including the total federal awards expended for loan or loan guarantee programs in the schedule; and (6) Include notes that describe that significant accounting policies used in preparing the schedule and note whether or not the non-Federal entity elected to use the 10% de minimis cost rate as covered in §200.414 Indirect (F&A) costs. Cause: The City does not maintain a centralized grant accounting function or standardized policies and procedures, including requirements to periodically submit and reconcile expenditures; instead, each department maintains its own grant information. The lack of submission of grant documents and accurate information by the various agencies and departments to Finance weakens internal controls over grant reporting and hinders the ability of Finance to accurately prepare the Schedule. Internal controls over financial reporting should be designed to prevent, detect or correct errors in a timely manner. Without adequate controls, the City cannot provide reasonable assurance that the Schedule is fairly presented. Controls have not been established by the City to ensure complete and accurate reporting for the Schedule for the 2024 fiscal year. Effect: The determination of which major programs will be audited is affected by the accuracy of the Schedule at the time of audit. Without proper internal controls over financial reporting, inaccurate reporting of the City’s financial information could occur, and the City cannot provide reasonable assurance that the SEFA is fairly presented. As a result, individual program reports throughout the year could have inaccurate information. There were also significant delays in the preparation of the Schedule of Federal awards, which prevented the City from meeting the March 31, 2025 deadline with the Federal clearinghouse. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend that Finance establish policies and procedures to ensure that the Federal funds are properly identified and reported accurately in the Schedule in accordance with Uniform Guidance requirements. We also recommend that individuals responsible for administering Federal assistance programs with the City receive training in grant administration. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Finding 2024-007 Programs: All Material Weakness over Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) Reporting Repeat Finding: Yes; 2023-006 Condition: Finance is responsible for preparing the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards based upon grant information obtained from the financial accounting records and other information provided by each department or agency. In many instances, the detail expenditure information in the accounting software differed from the expenditures reported by various City departments. Additionally, expenditures related to sub-recipients, subcontractors, and beneficiaries are not adequately tracked in the general ledger. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.303, Internal controls: The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.508, Auditee responsibilities: The auditee must: (b) Prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards in accordance with §200.510 Financial statements. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.510, Financial statements: (b) Schedule of expenditures of Federal awards: the auditee must also prepare a schedule of expenditures of Federal awards for the period covered by the auditee’s financial statements which must include the total Federal awards expended as determined in accordance with §200.502 Basis for determining Federal awards expended. While not required, the auditee may choose to provide information requested by Federal awarding agencies and pass-through entities to make the schedule easier to use. For example, when a Federal program has multiple Federal award years, the auditee may list the amount of Federal awards expended for each Federal award year separately. At a minimum, the schedule must: (1) List individual Federal programs by Federal agency. For a cluster of programs, provide the cluster name, list individual Federal programs within the cluster of programs, and provide the applicable Federal agency name. For R&D, total Federal awards expended must be shown either by individual Federal award or by Federal agency and major subdivision within the Federal agency. (2) For Federal awards received as a subrecipient, the name of the pass-through entity and identifying number assigned by the pass-through entity must be included. (3) Provide total Federal awards expended for each individual Federal program and the AL number or other identifying number when the AL information is not available. For a cluster of programs, also provide the total for the cluster. (4) Include the total amount provided to subrecipients from each Federal program. (5) For loan or loan guarantee programs described in § 200.502(b), identify in the notes to the schedule the balances outstanding at the end of the audit period. This is in addition to including the total federal awards expended for loan or loan guarantee programs in the schedule; and (6) Include notes that describe that significant accounting policies used in preparing the schedule and note whether or not the non-Federal entity elected to use the 10% de minimis cost rate as covered in §200.414 Indirect (F&A) costs. Cause: The City does not maintain a centralized grant accounting function or standardized policies and procedures, including requirements to periodically submit and reconcile expenditures; instead, each department maintains its own grant information. The lack of submission of grant documents and accurate information by the various agencies and departments to Finance weakens internal controls over grant reporting and hinders the ability of Finance to accurately prepare the Schedule. Internal controls over financial reporting should be designed to prevent, detect or correct errors in a timely manner. Without adequate controls, the City cannot provide reasonable assurance that the Schedule is fairly presented. Controls have not been established by the City to ensure complete and accurate reporting for the Schedule for the 2024 fiscal year. Effect: The determination of which major programs will be audited is affected by the accuracy of the Schedule at the time of audit. Without proper internal controls over financial reporting, inaccurate reporting of the City’s financial information could occur, and the City cannot provide reasonable assurance that the SEFA is fairly presented. As a result, individual program reports throughout the year could have inaccurate information. There were also significant delays in the preparation of the Schedule of Federal awards, which prevented the City from meeting the March 31, 2025 deadline with the Federal clearinghouse. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend that Finance establish policies and procedures to ensure that the Federal funds are properly identified and reported accurately in the Schedule in accordance with Uniform Guidance requirements. We also recommend that individuals responsible for administering Federal assistance programs with the City receive training in grant administration. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Finding 2024-007 Programs: All Material Weakness over Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) Reporting Repeat Finding: Yes; 2023-006 Condition: Finance is responsible for preparing the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards based upon grant information obtained from the financial accounting records and other information provided by each department or agency. In many instances, the detail expenditure information in the accounting software differed from the expenditures reported by various City departments. Additionally, expenditures related to sub-recipients, subcontractors, and beneficiaries are not adequately tracked in the general ledger. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.303, Internal controls: The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.508, Auditee responsibilities: The auditee must: (b) Prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards in accordance with §200.510 Financial statements. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.510, Financial statements: (b) Schedule of expenditures of Federal awards: the auditee must also prepare a schedule of expenditures of Federal awards for the period covered by the auditee’s financial statements which must include the total Federal awards expended as determined in accordance with §200.502 Basis for determining Federal awards expended. While not required, the auditee may choose to provide information requested by Federal awarding agencies and pass-through entities to make the schedule easier to use. For example, when a Federal program has multiple Federal award years, the auditee may list the amount of Federal awards expended for each Federal award year separately. At a minimum, the schedule must: (1) List individual Federal programs by Federal agency. For a cluster of programs, provide the cluster name, list individual Federal programs within the cluster of programs, and provide the applicable Federal agency name. For R&D, total Federal awards expended must be shown either by individual Federal award or by Federal agency and major subdivision within the Federal agency. (2) For Federal awards received as a subrecipient, the name of the pass-through entity and identifying number assigned by the pass-through entity must be included. (3) Provide total Federal awards expended for each individual Federal program and the AL number or other identifying number when the AL information is not available. For a cluster of programs, also provide the total for the cluster. (4) Include the total amount provided to subrecipients from each Federal program. (5) For loan or loan guarantee programs described in § 200.502(b), identify in the notes to the schedule the balances outstanding at the end of the audit period. This is in addition to including the total federal awards expended for loan or loan guarantee programs in the schedule; and (6) Include notes that describe that significant accounting policies used in preparing the schedule and note whether or not the non-Federal entity elected to use the 10% de minimis cost rate as covered in §200.414 Indirect (F&A) costs. Cause: The City does not maintain a centralized grant accounting function or standardized policies and procedures, including requirements to periodically submit and reconcile expenditures; instead, each department maintains its own grant information. The lack of submission of grant documents and accurate information by the various agencies and departments to Finance weakens internal controls over grant reporting and hinders the ability of Finance to accurately prepare the Schedule. Internal controls over financial reporting should be designed to prevent, detect or correct errors in a timely manner. Without adequate controls, the City cannot provide reasonable assurance that the Schedule is fairly presented. Controls have not been established by the City to ensure complete and accurate reporting for the Schedule for the 2024 fiscal year. Effect: The determination of which major programs will be audited is affected by the accuracy of the Schedule at the time of audit. Without proper internal controls over financial reporting, inaccurate reporting of the City’s financial information could occur, and the City cannot provide reasonable assurance that the SEFA is fairly presented. As a result, individual program reports throughout the year could have inaccurate information. There were also significant delays in the preparation of the Schedule of Federal awards, which prevented the City from meeting the March 31, 2025 deadline with the Federal clearinghouse. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend that Finance establish policies and procedures to ensure that the Federal funds are properly identified and reported accurately in the Schedule in accordance with Uniform Guidance requirements. We also recommend that individuals responsible for administering Federal assistance programs with the City receive training in grant administration. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Finding 2024-007 Programs: All Material Weakness over Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) Reporting Repeat Finding: Yes; 2023-006 Condition: Finance is responsible for preparing the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards based upon grant information obtained from the financial accounting records and other information provided by each department or agency. In many instances, the detail expenditure information in the accounting software differed from the expenditures reported by various City departments. Additionally, expenditures related to sub-recipients, subcontractors, and beneficiaries are not adequately tracked in the general ledger. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.303, Internal controls: The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.508, Auditee responsibilities: The auditee must: (b) Prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards in accordance with §200.510 Financial statements. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.510, Financial statements: (b) Schedule of expenditures of Federal awards: the auditee must also prepare a schedule of expenditures of Federal awards for the period covered by the auditee’s financial statements which must include the total Federal awards expended as determined in accordance with §200.502 Basis for determining Federal awards expended. While not required, the auditee may choose to provide information requested by Federal awarding agencies and pass-through entities to make the schedule easier to use. For example, when a Federal program has multiple Federal award years, the auditee may list the amount of Federal awards expended for each Federal award year separately. At a minimum, the schedule must: (1) List individual Federal programs by Federal agency. For a cluster of programs, provide the cluster name, list individual Federal programs within the cluster of programs, and provide the applicable Federal agency name. For R&D, total Federal awards expended must be shown either by individual Federal award or by Federal agency and major subdivision within the Federal agency. (2) For Federal awards received as a subrecipient, the name of the pass-through entity and identifying number assigned by the pass-through entity must be included. (3) Provide total Federal awards expended for each individual Federal program and the AL number or other identifying number when the AL information is not available. For a cluster of programs, also provide the total for the cluster. (4) Include the total amount provided to subrecipients from each Federal program. (5) For loan or loan guarantee programs described in § 200.502(b), identify in the notes to the schedule the balances outstanding at the end of the audit period. This is in addition to including the total federal awards expended for loan or loan guarantee programs in the schedule; and (6) Include notes that describe that significant accounting policies used in preparing the schedule and note whether or not the non-Federal entity elected to use the 10% de minimis cost rate as covered in §200.414 Indirect (F&A) costs. Cause: The City does not maintain a centralized grant accounting function or standardized policies and procedures, including requirements to periodically submit and reconcile expenditures; instead, each department maintains its own grant information. The lack of submission of grant documents and accurate information by the various agencies and departments to Finance weakens internal controls over grant reporting and hinders the ability of Finance to accurately prepare the Schedule. Internal controls over financial reporting should be designed to prevent, detect or correct errors in a timely manner. Without adequate controls, the City cannot provide reasonable assurance that the Schedule is fairly presented. Controls have not been established by the City to ensure complete and accurate reporting for the Schedule for the 2024 fiscal year. Effect: The determination of which major programs will be audited is affected by the accuracy of the Schedule at the time of audit. Without proper internal controls over financial reporting, inaccurate reporting of the City’s financial information could occur, and the City cannot provide reasonable assurance that the SEFA is fairly presented. As a result, individual program reports throughout the year could have inaccurate information. There were also significant delays in the preparation of the Schedule of Federal awards, which prevented the City from meeting the March 31, 2025 deadline with the Federal clearinghouse. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend that Finance establish policies and procedures to ensure that the Federal funds are properly identified and reported accurately in the Schedule in accordance with Uniform Guidance requirements. We also recommend that individuals responsible for administering Federal assistance programs with the City receive training in grant administration. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Finding 2024-007 Programs: All Material Weakness over Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) Reporting Repeat Finding: Yes; 2023-006 Condition: Finance is responsible for preparing the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards based upon grant information obtained from the financial accounting records and other information provided by each department or agency. In many instances, the detail expenditure information in the accounting software differed from the expenditures reported by various City departments. Additionally, expenditures related to sub-recipients, subcontractors, and beneficiaries are not adequately tracked in the general ledger. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.303, Internal controls: The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.508, Auditee responsibilities: The auditee must: (b) Prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards in accordance with §200.510 Financial statements. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.510, Financial statements: (b) Schedule of expenditures of Federal awards: the auditee must also prepare a schedule of expenditures of Federal awards for the period covered by the auditee’s financial statements which must include the total Federal awards expended as determined in accordance with §200.502 Basis for determining Federal awards expended. While not required, the auditee may choose to provide information requested by Federal awarding agencies and pass-through entities to make the schedule easier to use. For example, when a Federal program has multiple Federal award years, the auditee may list the amount of Federal awards expended for each Federal award year separately. At a minimum, the schedule must: (1) List individual Federal programs by Federal agency. For a cluster of programs, provide the cluster name, list individual Federal programs within the cluster of programs, and provide the applicable Federal agency name. For R&D, total Federal awards expended must be shown either by individual Federal award or by Federal agency and major subdivision within the Federal agency. (2) For Federal awards received as a subrecipient, the name of the pass-through entity and identifying number assigned by the pass-through entity must be included. (3) Provide total Federal awards expended for each individual Federal program and the AL number or other identifying number when the AL information is not available. For a cluster of programs, also provide the total for the cluster. (4) Include the total amount provided to subrecipients from each Federal program. (5) For loan or loan guarantee programs described in § 200.502(b), identify in the notes to the schedule the balances outstanding at the end of the audit period. This is in addition to including the total federal awards expended for loan or loan guarantee programs in the schedule; and (6) Include notes that describe that significant accounting policies used in preparing the schedule and note whether or not the non-Federal entity elected to use the 10% de minimis cost rate as covered in §200.414 Indirect (F&A) costs. Cause: The City does not maintain a centralized grant accounting function or standardized policies and procedures, including requirements to periodically submit and reconcile expenditures; instead, each department maintains its own grant information. The lack of submission of grant documents and accurate information by the various agencies and departments to Finance weakens internal controls over grant reporting and hinders the ability of Finance to accurately prepare the Schedule. Internal controls over financial reporting should be designed to prevent, detect or correct errors in a timely manner. Without adequate controls, the City cannot provide reasonable assurance that the Schedule is fairly presented. Controls have not been established by the City to ensure complete and accurate reporting for the Schedule for the 2024 fiscal year. Effect: The determination of which major programs will be audited is affected by the accuracy of the Schedule at the time of audit. Without proper internal controls over financial reporting, inaccurate reporting of the City’s financial information could occur, and the City cannot provide reasonable assurance that the SEFA is fairly presented. As a result, individual program reports throughout the year could have inaccurate information. There were also significant delays in the preparation of the Schedule of Federal awards, which prevented the City from meeting the March 31, 2025 deadline with the Federal clearinghouse. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend that Finance establish policies and procedures to ensure that the Federal funds are properly identified and reported accurately in the Schedule in accordance with Uniform Guidance requirements. We also recommend that individuals responsible for administering Federal assistance programs with the City receive training in grant administration. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Finding 2024-007 Programs: All Material Weakness over Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) Reporting Repeat Finding: Yes; 2023-006 Condition: Finance is responsible for preparing the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards based upon grant information obtained from the financial accounting records and other information provided by each department or agency. In many instances, the detail expenditure information in the accounting software differed from the expenditures reported by various City departments. Additionally, expenditures related to sub-recipients, subcontractors, and beneficiaries are not adequately tracked in the general ledger. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.303, Internal controls: The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.508, Auditee responsibilities: The auditee must: (b) Prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards in accordance with §200.510 Financial statements. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.510, Financial statements: (b) Schedule of expenditures of Federal awards: the auditee must also prepare a schedule of expenditures of Federal awards for the period covered by the auditee’s financial statements which must include the total Federal awards expended as determined in accordance with §200.502 Basis for determining Federal awards expended. While not required, the auditee may choose to provide information requested by Federal awarding agencies and pass-through entities to make the schedule easier to use. For example, when a Federal program has multiple Federal award years, the auditee may list the amount of Federal awards expended for each Federal award year separately. At a minimum, the schedule must: (1) List individual Federal programs by Federal agency. For a cluster of programs, provide the cluster name, list individual Federal programs within the cluster of programs, and provide the applicable Federal agency name. For R&D, total Federal awards expended must be shown either by individual Federal award or by Federal agency and major subdivision within the Federal agency. (2) For Federal awards received as a subrecipient, the name of the pass-through entity and identifying number assigned by the pass-through entity must be included. (3) Provide total Federal awards expended for each individual Federal program and the AL number or other identifying number when the AL information is not available. For a cluster of programs, also provide the total for the cluster. (4) Include the total amount provided to subrecipients from each Federal program. (5) For loan or loan guarantee programs described in § 200.502(b), identify in the notes to the schedule the balances outstanding at the end of the audit period. This is in addition to including the total federal awards expended for loan or loan guarantee programs in the schedule; and (6) Include notes that describe that significant accounting policies used in preparing the schedule and note whether or not the non-Federal entity elected to use the 10% de minimis cost rate as covered in §200.414 Indirect (F&A) costs. Cause: The City does not maintain a centralized grant accounting function or standardized policies and procedures, including requirements to periodically submit and reconcile expenditures; instead, each department maintains its own grant information. The lack of submission of grant documents and accurate information by the various agencies and departments to Finance weakens internal controls over grant reporting and hinders the ability of Finance to accurately prepare the Schedule. Internal controls over financial reporting should be designed to prevent, detect or correct errors in a timely manner. Without adequate controls, the City cannot provide reasonable assurance that the Schedule is fairly presented. Controls have not been established by the City to ensure complete and accurate reporting for the Schedule for the 2024 fiscal year. Effect: The determination of which major programs will be audited is affected by the accuracy of the Schedule at the time of audit. Without proper internal controls over financial reporting, inaccurate reporting of the City’s financial information could occur, and the City cannot provide reasonable assurance that the SEFA is fairly presented. As a result, individual program reports throughout the year could have inaccurate information. There were also significant delays in the preparation of the Schedule of Federal awards, which prevented the City from meeting the March 31, 2025 deadline with the Federal clearinghouse. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend that Finance establish policies and procedures to ensure that the Federal funds are properly identified and reported accurately in the Schedule in accordance with Uniform Guidance requirements. We also recommend that individuals responsible for administering Federal assistance programs with the City receive training in grant administration. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Finding 2024-007 Programs: All Material Weakness over Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) Reporting Repeat Finding: Yes; 2023-006 Condition: Finance is responsible for preparing the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards based upon grant information obtained from the financial accounting records and other information provided by each department or agency. In many instances, the detail expenditure information in the accounting software differed from the expenditures reported by various City departments. Additionally, expenditures related to sub-recipients, subcontractors, and beneficiaries are not adequately tracked in the general ledger. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.303, Internal controls: The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.508, Auditee responsibilities: The auditee must: (b) Prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards in accordance with §200.510 Financial statements. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.510, Financial statements: (b) Schedule of expenditures of Federal awards: the auditee must also prepare a schedule of expenditures of Federal awards for the period covered by the auditee’s financial statements which must include the total Federal awards expended as determined in accordance with §200.502 Basis for determining Federal awards expended. While not required, the auditee may choose to provide information requested by Federal awarding agencies and pass-through entities to make the schedule easier to use. For example, when a Federal program has multiple Federal award years, the auditee may list the amount of Federal awards expended for each Federal award year separately. At a minimum, the schedule must: (1) List individual Federal programs by Federal agency. For a cluster of programs, provide the cluster name, list individual Federal programs within the cluster of programs, and provide the applicable Federal agency name. For R&D, total Federal awards expended must be shown either by individual Federal award or by Federal agency and major subdivision within the Federal agency. (2) For Federal awards received as a subrecipient, the name of the pass-through entity and identifying number assigned by the pass-through entity must be included. (3) Provide total Federal awards expended for each individual Federal program and the AL number or other identifying number when the AL information is not available. For a cluster of programs, also provide the total for the cluster. (4) Include the total amount provided to subrecipients from each Federal program. (5) For loan or loan guarantee programs described in § 200.502(b), identify in the notes to the schedule the balances outstanding at the end of the audit period. This is in addition to including the total federal awards expended for loan or loan guarantee programs in the schedule; and (6) Include notes that describe that significant accounting policies used in preparing the schedule and note whether or not the non-Federal entity elected to use the 10% de minimis cost rate as covered in §200.414 Indirect (F&A) costs. Cause: The City does not maintain a centralized grant accounting function or standardized policies and procedures, including requirements to periodically submit and reconcile expenditures; instead, each department maintains its own grant information. The lack of submission of grant documents and accurate information by the various agencies and departments to Finance weakens internal controls over grant reporting and hinders the ability of Finance to accurately prepare the Schedule. Internal controls over financial reporting should be designed to prevent, detect or correct errors in a timely manner. Without adequate controls, the City cannot provide reasonable assurance that the Schedule is fairly presented. Controls have not been established by the City to ensure complete and accurate reporting for the Schedule for the 2024 fiscal year. Effect: The determination of which major programs will be audited is affected by the accuracy of the Schedule at the time of audit. Without proper internal controls over financial reporting, inaccurate reporting of the City’s financial information could occur, and the City cannot provide reasonable assurance that the SEFA is fairly presented. As a result, individual program reports throughout the year could have inaccurate information. There were also significant delays in the preparation of the Schedule of Federal awards, which prevented the City from meeting the March 31, 2025 deadline with the Federal clearinghouse. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend that Finance establish policies and procedures to ensure that the Federal funds are properly identified and reported accurately in the Schedule in accordance with Uniform Guidance requirements. We also recommend that individuals responsible for administering Federal assistance programs with the City receive training in grant administration. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Finding 2024-007 Programs: All Material Weakness over Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) Reporting Repeat Finding: Yes; 2023-006 Condition: Finance is responsible for preparing the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards based upon grant information obtained from the financial accounting records and other information provided by each department or agency. In many instances, the detail expenditure information in the accounting software differed from the expenditures reported by various City departments. Additionally, expenditures related to sub-recipients, subcontractors, and beneficiaries are not adequately tracked in the general ledger. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.303, Internal controls: The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.508, Auditee responsibilities: The auditee must: (b) Prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards in accordance with §200.510 Financial statements. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.510, Financial statements: (b) Schedule of expenditures of Federal awards: the auditee must also prepare a schedule of expenditures of Federal awards for the period covered by the auditee’s financial statements which must include the total Federal awards expended as determined in accordance with §200.502 Basis for determining Federal awards expended. While not required, the auditee may choose to provide information requested by Federal awarding agencies and pass-through entities to make the schedule easier to use. For example, when a Federal program has multiple Federal award years, the auditee may list the amount of Federal awards expended for each Federal award year separately. At a minimum, the schedule must: (1) List individual Federal programs by Federal agency. For a cluster of programs, provide the cluster name, list individual Federal programs within the cluster of programs, and provide the applicable Federal agency name. For R&D, total Federal awards expended must be shown either by individual Federal award or by Federal agency and major subdivision within the Federal agency. (2) For Federal awards received as a subrecipient, the name of the pass-through entity and identifying number assigned by the pass-through entity must be included. (3) Provide total Federal awards expended for each individual Federal program and the AL number or other identifying number when the AL information is not available. For a cluster of programs, also provide the total for the cluster. (4) Include the total amount provided to subrecipients from each Federal program. (5) For loan or loan guarantee programs described in § 200.502(b), identify in the notes to the schedule the balances outstanding at the end of the audit period. This is in addition to including the total federal awards expended for loan or loan guarantee programs in the schedule; and (6) Include notes that describe that significant accounting policies used in preparing the schedule and note whether or not the non-Federal entity elected to use the 10% de minimis cost rate as covered in §200.414 Indirect (F&A) costs. Cause: The City does not maintain a centralized grant accounting function or standardized policies and procedures, including requirements to periodically submit and reconcile expenditures; instead, each department maintains its own grant information. The lack of submission of grant documents and accurate information by the various agencies and departments to Finance weakens internal controls over grant reporting and hinders the ability of Finance to accurately prepare the Schedule. Internal controls over financial reporting should be designed to prevent, detect or correct errors in a timely manner. Without adequate controls, the City cannot provide reasonable assurance that the Schedule is fairly presented. Controls have not been established by the City to ensure complete and accurate reporting for the Schedule for the 2024 fiscal year. Effect: The determination of which major programs will be audited is affected by the accuracy of the Schedule at the time of audit. Without proper internal controls over financial reporting, inaccurate reporting of the City’s financial information could occur, and the City cannot provide reasonable assurance that the SEFA is fairly presented. As a result, individual program reports throughout the year could have inaccurate information. There were also significant delays in the preparation of the Schedule of Federal awards, which prevented the City from meeting the March 31, 2025 deadline with the Federal clearinghouse. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend that Finance establish policies and procedures to ensure that the Federal funds are properly identified and reported accurately in the Schedule in accordance with Uniform Guidance requirements. We also recommend that individuals responsible for administering Federal assistance programs with the City receive training in grant administration. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Finding 2024-007 Programs: All Material Weakness over Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) Reporting Repeat Finding: Yes; 2023-006 Condition: Finance is responsible for preparing the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards based upon grant information obtained from the financial accounting records and other information provided by each department or agency. In many instances, the detail expenditure information in the accounting software differed from the expenditures reported by various City departments. Additionally, expenditures related to sub-recipients, subcontractors, and beneficiaries are not adequately tracked in the general ledger. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.303, Internal controls: The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.508, Auditee responsibilities: The auditee must: (b) Prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards in accordance with §200.510 Financial statements. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.510, Financial statements: (b) Schedule of expenditures of Federal awards: the auditee must also prepare a schedule of expenditures of Federal awards for the period covered by the auditee’s financial statements which must include the total Federal awards expended as determined in accordance with §200.502 Basis for determining Federal awards expended. While not required, the auditee may choose to provide information requested by Federal awarding agencies and pass-through entities to make the schedule easier to use. For example, when a Federal program has multiple Federal award years, the auditee may list the amount of Federal awards expended for each Federal award year separately. At a minimum, the schedule must: (1) List individual Federal programs by Federal agency. For a cluster of programs, provide the cluster name, list individual Federal programs within the cluster of programs, and provide the applicable Federal agency name. For R&D, total Federal awards expended must be shown either by individual Federal award or by Federal agency and major subdivision within the Federal agency. (2) For Federal awards received as a subrecipient, the name of the pass-through entity and identifying number assigned by the pass-through entity must be included. (3) Provide total Federal awards expended for each individual Federal program and the AL number or other identifying number when the AL information is not available. For a cluster of programs, also provide the total for the cluster. (4) Include the total amount provided to subrecipients from each Federal program. (5) For loan or loan guarantee programs described in § 200.502(b), identify in the notes to the schedule the balances outstanding at the end of the audit period. This is in addition to including the total federal awards expended for loan or loan guarantee programs in the schedule; and (6) Include notes that describe that significant accounting policies used in preparing the schedule and note whether or not the non-Federal entity elected to use the 10% de minimis cost rate as covered in §200.414 Indirect (F&A) costs. Cause: The City does not maintain a centralized grant accounting function or standardized policies and procedures, including requirements to periodically submit and reconcile expenditures; instead, each department maintains its own grant information. The lack of submission of grant documents and accurate information by the various agencies and departments to Finance weakens internal controls over grant reporting and hinders the ability of Finance to accurately prepare the Schedule. Internal controls over financial reporting should be designed to prevent, detect or correct errors in a timely manner. Without adequate controls, the City cannot provide reasonable assurance that the Schedule is fairly presented. Controls have not been established by the City to ensure complete and accurate reporting for the Schedule for the 2024 fiscal year. Effect: The determination of which major programs will be audited is affected by the accuracy of the Schedule at the time of audit. Without proper internal controls over financial reporting, inaccurate reporting of the City’s financial information could occur, and the City cannot provide reasonable assurance that the SEFA is fairly presented. As a result, individual program reports throughout the year could have inaccurate information. There were also significant delays in the preparation of the Schedule of Federal awards, which prevented the City from meeting the March 31, 2025 deadline with the Federal clearinghouse. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend that Finance establish policies and procedures to ensure that the Federal funds are properly identified and reported accurately in the Schedule in accordance with Uniform Guidance requirements. We also recommend that individuals responsible for administering Federal assistance programs with the City receive training in grant administration. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Finding 2024-007 Programs: All Material Weakness over Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) Reporting Repeat Finding: Yes; 2023-006 Condition: Finance is responsible for preparing the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards based upon grant information obtained from the financial accounting records and other information provided by each department or agency. In many instances, the detail expenditure information in the accounting software differed from the expenditures reported by various City departments. Additionally, expenditures related to sub-recipients, subcontractors, and beneficiaries are not adequately tracked in the general ledger. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.303, Internal controls: The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.508, Auditee responsibilities: The auditee must: (b) Prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards in accordance with §200.510 Financial statements. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.510, Financial statements: (b) Schedule of expenditures of Federal awards: the auditee must also prepare a schedule of expenditures of Federal awards for the period covered by the auditee’s financial statements which must include the total Federal awards expended as determined in accordance with §200.502 Basis for determining Federal awards expended. While not required, the auditee may choose to provide information requested by Federal awarding agencies and pass-through entities to make the schedule easier to use. For example, when a Federal program has multiple Federal award years, the auditee may list the amount of Federal awards expended for each Federal award year separately. At a minimum, the schedule must: (1) List individual Federal programs by Federal agency. For a cluster of programs, provide the cluster name, list individual Federal programs within the cluster of programs, and provide the applicable Federal agency name. For R&D, total Federal awards expended must be shown either by individual Federal award or by Federal agency and major subdivision within the Federal agency. (2) For Federal awards received as a subrecipient, the name of the pass-through entity and identifying number assigned by the pass-through entity must be included. (3) Provide total Federal awards expended for each individual Federal program and the AL number or other identifying number when the AL information is not available. For a cluster of programs, also provide the total for the cluster. (4) Include the total amount provided to subrecipients from each Federal program. (5) For loan or loan guarantee programs described in § 200.502(b), identify in the notes to the schedule the balances outstanding at the end of the audit period. This is in addition to including the total federal awards expended for loan or loan guarantee programs in the schedule; and (6) Include notes that describe that significant accounting policies used in preparing the schedule and note whether or not the non-Federal entity elected to use the 10% de minimis cost rate as covered in §200.414 Indirect (F&A) costs. Cause: The City does not maintain a centralized grant accounting function or standardized policies and procedures, including requirements to periodically submit and reconcile expenditures; instead, each department maintains its own grant information. The lack of submission of grant documents and accurate information by the various agencies and departments to Finance weakens internal controls over grant reporting and hinders the ability of Finance to accurately prepare the Schedule. Internal controls over financial reporting should be designed to prevent, detect or correct errors in a timely manner. Without adequate controls, the City cannot provide reasonable assurance that the Schedule is fairly presented. Controls have not been established by the City to ensure complete and accurate reporting for the Schedule for the 2024 fiscal year. Effect: The determination of which major programs will be audited is affected by the accuracy of the Schedule at the time of audit. Without proper internal controls over financial reporting, inaccurate reporting of the City’s financial information could occur, and the City cannot provide reasonable assurance that the SEFA is fairly presented. As a result, individual program reports throughout the year could have inaccurate information. There were also significant delays in the preparation of the Schedule of Federal awards, which prevented the City from meeting the March 31, 2025 deadline with the Federal clearinghouse. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend that Finance establish policies and procedures to ensure that the Federal funds are properly identified and reported accurately in the Schedule in accordance with Uniform Guidance requirements. We also recommend that individuals responsible for administering Federal assistance programs with the City receive training in grant administration. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Finding 2024-007 Programs: All Material Weakness over Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) Reporting Repeat Finding: Yes; 2023-006 Condition: Finance is responsible for preparing the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards based upon grant information obtained from the financial accounting records and other information provided by each department or agency. In many instances, the detail expenditure information in the accounting software differed from the expenditures reported by various City departments. Additionally, expenditures related to sub-recipients, subcontractors, and beneficiaries are not adequately tracked in the general ledger. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.303, Internal controls: The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.508, Auditee responsibilities: The auditee must: (b) Prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards in accordance with §200.510 Financial statements. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.510, Financial statements: (b) Schedule of expenditures of Federal awards: the auditee must also prepare a schedule of expenditures of Federal awards for the period covered by the auditee’s financial statements which must include the total Federal awards expended as determined in accordance with §200.502 Basis for determining Federal awards expended. While not required, the auditee may choose to provide information requested by Federal awarding agencies and pass-through entities to make the schedule easier to use. For example, when a Federal program has multiple Federal award years, the auditee may list the amount of Federal awards expended for each Federal award year separately. At a minimum, the schedule must: (1) List individual Federal programs by Federal agency. For a cluster of programs, provide the cluster name, list individual Federal programs within the cluster of programs, and provide the applicable Federal agency name. For R&D, total Federal awards expended must be shown either by individual Federal award or by Federal agency and major subdivision within the Federal agency. (2) For Federal awards received as a subrecipient, the name of the pass-through entity and identifying number assigned by the pass-through entity must be included. (3) Provide total Federal awards expended for each individual Federal program and the AL number or other identifying number when the AL information is not available. For a cluster of programs, also provide the total for the cluster. (4) Include the total amount provided to subrecipients from each Federal program. (5) For loan or loan guarantee programs described in § 200.502(b), identify in the notes to the schedule the balances outstanding at the end of the audit period. This is in addition to including the total federal awards expended for loan or loan guarantee programs in the schedule; and (6) Include notes that describe that significant accounting policies used in preparing the schedule and note whether or not the non-Federal entity elected to use the 10% de minimis cost rate as covered in §200.414 Indirect (F&A) costs. Cause: The City does not maintain a centralized grant accounting function or standardized policies and procedures, including requirements to periodically submit and reconcile expenditures; instead, each department maintains its own grant information. The lack of submission of grant documents and accurate information by the various agencies and departments to Finance weakens internal controls over grant reporting and hinders the ability of Finance to accurately prepare the Schedule. Internal controls over financial reporting should be designed to prevent, detect or correct errors in a timely manner. Without adequate controls, the City cannot provide reasonable assurance that the Schedule is fairly presented. Controls have not been established by the City to ensure complete and accurate reporting for the Schedule for the 2024 fiscal year. Effect: The determination of which major programs will be audited is affected by the accuracy of the Schedule at the time of audit. Without proper internal controls over financial reporting, inaccurate reporting of the City’s financial information could occur, and the City cannot provide reasonable assurance that the SEFA is fairly presented. As a result, individual program reports throughout the year could have inaccurate information. There were also significant delays in the preparation of the Schedule of Federal awards, which prevented the City from meeting the March 31, 2025 deadline with the Federal clearinghouse. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend that Finance establish policies and procedures to ensure that the Federal funds are properly identified and reported accurately in the Schedule in accordance with Uniform Guidance requirements. We also recommend that individuals responsible for administering Federal assistance programs with the City receive training in grant administration. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
2024-002: Allocation of Costs Other Than Payroll Criteria or specific requirement: In accordance with Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200.414, the Alliance must allocate indirect costs appropriately. Condition and context: The Alliance allocates certain shared costs, other than payroll, using an approach that details the full-time equivalents performing work on each grant. During the year ended June 30, 2024, costs were allocation using a schedule that did not agree to actual underlying payroll data. Additionally, the schedule that was used was not reviewed by the Executive Director. Cause: The Alliance does not have adequate staffing in place to ensure that the proper allocations were used. Effect or potential effect: Without adequate controls over this process, the Alliance could charge unallowable costs to the HIV Formula Grants. Questioned costs: None. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: Not applicable. Recommendation: The Alliance should ensure that internal control processes for the allocation of cost are consistently followed. A review process should be in place to ensure that accurate allocations are used. The Alliance could also consider the use of the de minimis cost rate, which would alleviate the need to create an allocation approach for shared costs. Effective October 1, 2024, the de minimis cost rate increased to 15%. Views of responsible officials: Refer to the Corrective Action Plan prepared by the Alliance in regard to this matter.
2024-002: Allocation of Costs Other Than Payroll Criteria or specific requirement: In accordance with Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200.414, the Alliance must allocate indirect costs appropriately. Condition and context: The Alliance allocates certain shared costs, other than payroll, using an approach that details the full-time equivalents performing work on each grant. During the year ended June 30, 2024, costs were allocation using a schedule that did not agree to actual underlying payroll data. Additionally, the schedule that was used was not reviewed by the Executive Director. Cause: The Alliance does not have adequate staffing in place to ensure that the proper allocations were used. Effect or potential effect: Without adequate controls over this process, the Alliance could charge unallowable costs to the HIV Formula Grants. Questioned costs: None. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: Not applicable. Recommendation: The Alliance should ensure that internal control processes for the allocation of cost are consistently followed. A review process should be in place to ensure that accurate allocations are used. The Alliance could also consider the use of the de minimis cost rate, which would alleviate the need to create an allocation approach for shared costs. Effective October 1, 2024, the de minimis cost rate increased to 15%. Views of responsible officials: Refer to the Corrective Action Plan prepared by the Alliance in regard to this matter.
2024-002: Allocation of Costs Other Than Payroll Criteria or specific requirement: In accordance with Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200.414, the Alliance must allocate indirect costs appropriately. Condition and context: The Alliance allocates certain shared costs, other than payroll, using an approach that details the full-time equivalents performing work on each grant. During the year ended June 30, 2024, costs were allocation using a schedule that did not agree to actual underlying payroll data. Additionally, the schedule that was used was not reviewed by the Executive Director. Cause: The Alliance does not have adequate staffing in place to ensure that the proper allocations were used. Effect or potential effect: Without adequate controls over this process, the Alliance could charge unallowable costs to the HIV Formula Grants. Questioned costs: None. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: Not applicable. Recommendation: The Alliance should ensure that internal control processes for the allocation of cost are consistently followed. A review process should be in place to ensure that accurate allocations are used. The Alliance could also consider the use of the de minimis cost rate, which would alleviate the need to create an allocation approach for shared costs. Effective October 1, 2024, the de minimis cost rate increased to 15%. Views of responsible officials: Refer to the Corrective Action Plan prepared by the Alliance in regard to this matter.
2024-002: Allocation of Costs Other Than Payroll Criteria or specific requirement: In accordance with Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200.414, the Alliance must allocate indirect costs appropriately. Condition and context: The Alliance allocates certain shared costs, other than payroll, using an approach that details the full-time equivalents performing work on each grant. During the year ended June 30, 2024, costs were allocation using a schedule that did not agree to actual underlying payroll data. Additionally, the schedule that was used was not reviewed by the Executive Director. Cause: The Alliance does not have adequate staffing in place to ensure that the proper allocations were used. Effect or potential effect: Without adequate controls over this process, the Alliance could charge unallowable costs to the HIV Formula Grants. Questioned costs: None. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: Not applicable. Recommendation: The Alliance should ensure that internal control processes for the allocation of cost are consistently followed. A review process should be in place to ensure that accurate allocations are used. The Alliance could also consider the use of the de minimis cost rate, which would alleviate the need to create an allocation approach for shared costs. Effective October 1, 2024, the de minimis cost rate increased to 15%. Views of responsible officials: Refer to the Corrective Action Plan prepared by the Alliance in regard to this matter.
2024-002: Allocation of Costs Other Than Payroll Criteria or specific requirement: In accordance with Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200.414, the Alliance must allocate indirect costs appropriately. Condition and context: The Alliance allocates certain shared costs, other than payroll, using an approach that details the full-time equivalents performing work on each grant. During the year ended June 30, 2024, costs were allocation using a schedule that did not agree to actual underlying payroll data. Additionally, the schedule that was used was not reviewed by the Executive Director. Cause: The Alliance does not have adequate staffing in place to ensure that the proper allocations were used. Effect or potential effect: Without adequate controls over this process, the Alliance could charge unallowable costs to the HIV Formula Grants. Questioned costs: None. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: Not applicable. Recommendation: The Alliance should ensure that internal control processes for the allocation of cost are consistently followed. A review process should be in place to ensure that accurate allocations are used. The Alliance could also consider the use of the de minimis cost rate, which would alleviate the need to create an allocation approach for shared costs. Effective October 1, 2024, the de minimis cost rate increased to 15%. Views of responsible officials: Refer to the Corrective Action Plan prepared by the Alliance in regard to this matter.
Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR 200.414(f) states that recipients may elect to charge a de minimis rate of up to 10 percent of modified total direct costs (MTDC). 2 CFR 200.1 “Modified Total Direct Cost (MTDC)” excludes equipment, capital expenditures, charges for patient care, rental costs, tuition remission, scholarships and fellowships, participant support costs, and the portion of each subaward in excess of $50,000. Condition: During testing of indirect costs, 4 of the 4 samples tested erroneously included rental costs in the calculation of Modified Total Direct Costs, resulting in an overcharge of indirect costs to the program. Questioned costs: None. Context: For allowable costs (indirect), a sample of 4 was made from a population of 12 reimbursement requests for the major program. Of the 4 sampled, all rental costs included in the calculation of Modified Total Direct Costs, resulting in a slightly higher indirect cost calculation. Cause: There is a misunderstanding of which costs should be excluded from the MTDC for this specific contract. Occupancy / Space Rental costs are identified but are not removed during the calculation of indirect costs. Effect: Inadequate allocation of indirect costs to federal programs may result in noncompliance with grant regulations, which could result in penalties or repayment obligations. Repeat Finding: 2023-002 Recommendation: CLA recommends that CCS work with the USCCB to update the Reimbursement Request form to include a section that removes items of selected cost from the calculation of indirect costs. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR 200.414(f) states that recipients may elect to charge a de minimis rate of up to 10 percent of modified total direct costs (MTDC). 2 CFR 200.1 “Modified Total Direct Cost (MTDC)” excludes equipment, capital expenditures, charges for patient care, rental costs, tuition remission, scholarships and fellowships, participant support costs, and the portion of each subaward in excess of $50,000. Condition: During testing of indirect costs, 4 of the 4 samples tested erroneously included rental costs in the calculation of Modified Total Direct Costs, resulting in an overcharge of indirect costs to the program. Questioned costs: None. Context: For allowable costs (indirect), a sample of 4 was made from a population of 12 reimbursement requests for the major program. Of the 4 sampled, all rental costs included in the calculation of Modified Total Direct Costs, resulting in a slightly higher indirect cost calculation. Cause: There is a misunderstanding of which costs should be excluded from the MTDC for this specific contract. Occupancy / Space Rental costs are identified but are not removed during the calculation of indirect costs. Effect: Inadequate allocation of indirect costs to federal programs may result in noncompliance with grant regulations, which could result in penalties or repayment obligations. Repeat Finding: 2023-002 Recommendation: CLA recommends that CCS work with the USCCB to update the Reimbursement Request form to include a section that removes items of selected cost from the calculation of indirect costs. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2024 – 002: Schedule of Expenditure of Federal Awards (SEFA) Preparation Type of Finding: • Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting Condition: During testing, it was noted the School’s prepared SEFA did not properly reconcile to the underlying School records, which required additional adjustments of approximately $583,000. Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR 200.510(b) states: Schedule of expenditures of federal awards. The auditee must also prepare a schedule of expenditures of federal awards for the period covered by the auditee's financial statements which must include the total Federal awards expended as determined in accordance with § 200.502 Basis for determining federal awards expended. While not required, the auditee may choose to provide information requested by federal awarding agencies and pass-through entities to make the schedule easier to use. For example, when a federal program has multiple federal award years, the auditee may list the amount of federal awards expended for each federal award year separately. At a minimum, the schedule must: • List individual Federal programs by Federal agency. For a cluster of programs, provide the cluster name, list individual Federal programs within the cluster of programs, and provide the applicable Federal agency name. For R&D, total Federal awards expended must be shown either by individual Federal award or by Federal agency and major subdivision within the Federal agency. For example, the National Institutes of Health is a major subdivision in the Department of Health and Human Services. • For Federal awards received as a subrecipient, the name of the pass-through entity and identifying number assigned by the pass-through entity must be included. • Provide total Federal awards expended for each individual Federal program and the Assistance Listing number or other identifying number when the Assistance Listing information is not available. For a cluster of programs also provide the total for the cluster. • Include the total amount provided to subrecipients from each Federal program. • For loan or loan guarantee programs described in §200.502 Basis for determining federal awards expended, paragraph (b), identify in the notes to the schedule the balances outstanding at the end of the audit period. This is in addition to including the total Federal awards expended for loan or loan guarantee programs in the schedule. • Include notes that describe that significant accounting policies used in preparing the schedule, and note whether or not the auditee elected to use the 10% de minimis cost rate as covered in § 200.414 Indirect (F&A) costs. Effect: Without a proper system of internal controls in place that operated effectively, material misstatements of the SEFA remained undetected. Cause: Management had not established an effective system of internal controls that would have ensured proper reporting of the SEFA. Repeat finding: Yes – 2023-004. Recommendation: We recommend the school implement internal controls over the SEFA including a reconciliation and review process before submission. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Criteria or specific requirement: Per 2 CFR section 200.303(a), the Department must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Title 2 – Grants and Agreements. Subtitle A – Office of Management and Budget Guidance for Grants and Agreements. Chapter II – Office of Management and Budget Guidance. Part 200 – Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards. Subpart D – Post Federal Award Requirements. §200.332 Requirements for pass-through entities (2 CFR 200.332): All pass-through entities must: (a) Verify that the subrecipient is not excluded or disqualified in accordance with §180.300. Verification methods are provided in §180.300, which include confirming in SAM.gov that a potential subrecipient is not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from receiving Federal funds. (b) Ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the following information at the time of the subaward and if any of these data elements change, include the changes in subsequent subaward modification. When some of this information is not available, the pass-through entity must provide the best information available to describe the Federal award and subaward. 1) Federal award identification. a) Subrecipient name (which must match the name associated with its unique entity identifier); b) Subrecipient’s unique entity identifier; c) Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN); d) Federal Award Date (see the definition of Federal award date in § 200.1 of this part) of award to the recipient by the Federal agency; e) Subaward Period of Performance Start and End Date; f) Subaward Budget Period Start and End Date; g) Amount of Federal Funds Obligated by this action by the pass-through entity to the subrecipient; h) Total Amount of Federal Funds Obligated to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity including the current financial obligation; i) Total Amount of the Federal Award committed to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity; j) Federal award project description, as required to be responsive to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA); k) Name of Federal awarding agency, pass-through entity, and contact information for awarding official of the Pass-through entity; l) Assistance Listings number and Title; the pass-through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each Federal award and the Assistance Listings Number at time of disbursement; m) Identification of whether the award is R&D; and n) Indirect cost rate for the Federal award (including if the de minimis rate is charged) per §200.414. (c) Evaluate each subrecipient’s fraud risk and risk of noncompliance with a subaward to determine the appropriate subrecipient monitoring described in paragraphs (f) of this section. When evaluating a subrecipient’s risk, a passthrough entity should consider the following: 1) The subrecipient’s prior experience with the same or similar subawards: 2) The results of previous audits. This includes considering whether or not the subrecipient receives a Single Audit in accordance with Subpart F and the extent to which the same or similar subawards have been audited as a major program; 3) Whether the subrecipient has new personnel or new or substantially changed systems; and 4) The extent and results of Federal agency monitoring (for example, if the subrecipient also receives Federal awards directly from the Federal agency). Condition: Public Health established a formal risk assessment process over its subrecipients of federal awards by which to determine the frequency and extent of subrecipient monitoring to be performed, however the process was established after the period under audit and applied prospectively. In addition, Public Health used a Department Allocation Letter (DAL) for the COVID-19 program instead of an agreement or contract for the subaward to subrecipients. Certain required information for the subaward federal award information such as Assistance Listings number and Title and Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN) were not clearly identified in the DAL. Questioned costs: None Context: See “Condition.” Cause: Procedures to ensure that all relevant information is included in the grant agreements and risk assessments are performed were not in place at the time of the agreements which resulted in the oversight. Effect: By not properly evaluating the risk of noncompliance, Public Health may inadvertently award grant funds to subrecipients who lack the necessary mechanisms or understanding to comply with federal statutes. This increases the likelihood of noncompliance arising during the performance of the grant-funded activities. Furthermore, failure to provide the necessary documentation to subrecipients may result in misuse or misreporting of funding. Repeat Finding: This was reported in the previous year as finding 2023-009. Recommendation: Public Health should ensure every subaward includes all requirements imposed on the subrecipient so that the federal award is used in accordance with Federal statutes, regulations and the terms and conditions of the federal award. Views of responsible officials: Management’s response is reported in “Management’s Response and Corrective Action Plan” included in a separate section at the end of this report.
Finding 2024-003 Internal Control and Compliance over Subrecipient Monitoring (Material Weakness) Information on the Federal Program: Assistance Listing Number(s): 17.258, 17.259, 17.278 Federal Program Name: Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA) Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Labor Pass-Through Entity: California Employment Development Department Federal Award Number and Award Year: AA211008/AA311008/AA411008/AA411009/AA411010 Criteria: Title 2 - Grants and Agreements. Subtitle A - Office of Management and Budget Guidance for Grants and Agreements. Chapter II - Office of Management and Budget Guidance. Part 200 - Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards. Subpart D - Post Federal Award Requirements. Standards for Financial and Program Management. §200.303 Internal controls (2 CFR 200.303): The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Title 2: Grants and Agreements, Subtitle A - Office of Management and Budget Guidance for Grants and Agreements, Chapter II - Office of Management and Budget Guidance, Part 200 - Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards Subpart D - Post Federal Award Requirements, Subrecipient Monitoring and Management, §200.331 Requirements for pass-through entities (2 CFR 200.331): All pass-through entities must: (a) Ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the following information at the time of the subaward and if any of these data elements change, include the changes in subsequent subaward modification. When some of this information is not available, the pass-through entity must provide the best information available to describe the Federal award and subaward. Required information includes: (1) Federal award identification i. Subrecipient name (which must match the name associated with its unique entity identifier); ii. Subrecipient's unique entity identifier; iii. Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN); iv. Federal Award Date (see the definition of Federal award date in § 200.1 of this part) of award to the recipient by the Federal agency; v. Subaward Period of Performance Start and End Date; vi. Subaward Budget Period Start and End Date; vii. Amount of Federal Funds Obligated by this action by the pass-through entity to the subrecipient; viii. Total Amount of Federal Funds Obligated to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity including the current financial obligation; ix. Total Amount of the Federal Award committed to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity; x. Federal award project description, as required to be responsive to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA); xi. Name of Federal awarding agency, pass-through entity, and contact information for awarding official of the Pass-through entity; xii. Assistance Listings number and Title; the pass-through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each Federal award and the Assistance Listings Number at time of disbursement; xiii. Identification of whether the award is R&D; and xiv. Indirect cost rate for the Federal award (including if the de minimis rate is charged) per § 200.414.; (1) All requirements imposed by the pass-through entity on the subrecipient so that the Federal award is used in accordance with Federal statutes, regulations and the terms and conditions of the Federal award; (2) Any additional requirements that the pass-through entity imposes on the subrecipient in order for the pass-through entity to meet its own responsibility to the Federal awarding agency including identification of any required financial and performance reports; Title 2: Grants and Agreements, Subtitle A - Office of Management and Budget Guidance for Grants and Agreements, Chapter II - Office of Management and Budget Guidance, Part 200 - Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards Subpart D - Post Federal Award Requirements, Subrecipient Monitoring and Management, §200.332 Requirements for pass-through entities (2 CFR 200.332): All pass-through entities must: (a) Evaluate each subrecipient's risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring described in paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section, which may include consideration of such factors as: (1) The subrecipient's prior experience with the same or similar subawards; (2) The results of previous audits including whether or not the subrecipient receives a Single Audit in accordance with Subpart F of this part, and the extent to which the same or similar subaward has been audited as a major program; (3) Whether the subrecipient has new personnel or new or substantially changed systems; and (4) The extent and results of Federal awarding agency monitoring (e.g., if the subrecipient also receives Federal awards directly from a Federal awarding agency). Condition: During our testing of the Imperial County Workforce Development Office’s (ICWDO) provisions for subrecipient monitoring under the WIOA Cluster, we noted two (2) of the two (2) subrecipient selected for testing, there was no review or approval over the monitoring procedures performed by ICWDO monitoring staff. The entire population consisted of two (2) subrecipients. Also, the County did not document their evaluation of the subrecipient’s risk of noncompliance. The following information was not provided at the time of the subaward for two (2) of the two (2) subawards selected for testing: o Federal award identification number o Federal award date of award to recipient by the Federal agency o Name of federal awarding agency o Federal Financial Assistance Listing/CFDA Number o Identification of whether the award is research and development Cause: The County’s ICWDO department does not have a formal procedure in place for the department’s review and approval over the monitoring procedures performed by the department over its subrecipients. The ICWDO department did not ensure that the required award information and applicable requirements were communicated to the subrecipients and did not maintain documentation of their evaluation of each subrecipient’s risk of noncompliance. Effect: The County’s ICWDO department did not review and approve monitoring procedures performed over its subrecipients. Additionally, the ICWDO department did not maintain policies and procedures to align with the Subrecipient Monitoring requirements in 2 CFR 200.332 (a) and 200.332(b). Identification as a Repeat Finding, If Applicable: Yes. See Finding 2023-004. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs were identified. Recommendation: We recommend ICWDO implement policies and procedures in accordance with 2 CFR 200.331(a) 200.332(b) to ensure compliance with subrecipient monitoring requirements and that require the review and approval of the monitoring procedures performed over its subrecipients by a separate individual. View of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: See separate Corrective Action Plan.
FINDING NO: 2024-016 (Partial Repeat #2023-021) Strengthen Internal Controls Over Review and Approval of Claims STATE AGENCY: Oklahoma State Department of Education (OSDE) FEDERAL AGENCY: United States Department of Education (USDE) ALN: 84.425 – 84.425D; 84.425U FEDERAL PROGRAM NAME: Education Stabilization Fund (ESF): Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund (ESSER); American Rescue Plan – Elementary and Secondary Schools Emergency Relief Fund (ARP ESSER) FEDERAL AWARD NUMBER: S425D210024; S425U210024 FEDERAL AWARD YEAR: 2024 CONTROL CATEGORY: Activities Allowed or Unallowed & Allowable Costs/Cost Principles; Subrecipient Monitoring QUESTIONED COSTS: 84.425U - $358 Condition and Context: OSDE has policies and procedures in place to review and approve claims. Additionally, the Grants Management System (GMS) has edits for the ESF allocation notices. Activities Allowed or Unallowed & Allowable Costs/Cost Principles We tested a sample of 65 of 4,382 (1.48%) ESSER II and ARP ESSER III claims totaling $47,049,093 and identified: • Four of 65 (6.15%) claims did not have an adequate review and approval of the electronic claim by an authorized claims auditor, which resulted in o unallowable items purchased totaling $303, o an overpayment totaling $55, o missing supporting invoices at the time of claim approval, and o costs coded to the wrong ARP ESSER III program. Subrecipient Monitoring We reviewed the allocation notices applicable to all LEAs that had claims in the claims sample noted above and identified: • For 25 of 59 (42.37%) LEAs, the allocation notices were not generated and provided to inform the LEA of the 2 CFR § 200.332(a)(1) requirements. Additionally, we noted during our documentation of procedures over allocation notices, one allocation notice did not contain the FAIN or the Federal award date as required. However, we determined the allocations per the allocation spreadsheet and budgets in the GMS were correct. Cause: OSDE’s claims review and approval process lacked the necessary strength and consistency to adequately review claims to ensure proper supporting documentation, including invoices, agrees with the expenditures submitted on the claim and agrees to the approved budgeted items to ensure the amounts claimed were accurate and for allowable costs. OSDE’s monitoring and oversight process lacked the necessary strength and consistency to ensure allocation notices populated correctly and generated notices from GMS. Effect: Inadequate review of claims, along with insufficient verification of required supporting documentation, increases the risk of reimbursing unallowable expenses, resulting in noncompliance. Furthermore, noncompliance increases the risk of Federal claw backs, which impacts state dollars. Noncompliance during the audit period resulted in $359 of actual questioned costs and $43,168 in projected questioned costs for ALN # 84.425U (projects 559 and 795). Additionally, not informing LEAs of the required information per the 2 CFR § 200.332 increases the risk of noncompliance occurring within the program. Recommendation: We recommend OSDE strengthen its claims review and approval process to ensure accurate supporting documentation for claims is included, only allowable uses and costs of ESF are reimbursed, and expenditures are correctly coded to the proper program. We also recommend that OSDE enhance the monitoring and oversight process to ensure allocation notices containing all 2 CFR § 200.332 requirements are populated correctly and generated from GMS. Criteria: 2 CFR § 200.332 states in part: “All pass-through entities must: (a) Ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the following information at the time of the subaward and if any of these data elements change, include the changes in subsequent subaward modification. When some of this information is not available, the pass-through entity must provide the best information available to describe the Federal award and subaward. Required information includes: (1) Federal Award Identification. (i) Subrecipient name (which must match the name associated with its unique entity identifier); (ii) Subrecipient's unique entity identifier; (iii) Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN); (iv) Federal Award Date (see § 200.39 Federal award date) of award to the recipient by the Federal agency; (v) Subaward Period of Performance Start and End Date; (vi) Amount of Federal Funds Obligated by this action by the pass-through entity to the subrecipient; (vii) Total Amount of Federal Funds Obligated to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity including the current obligation; (viii) Total Amount of the Federal Award committed to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity; (ix) Federal award project description, as required to be responsive to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA); (x) Name of Federal awarding agency, pass-through entity, and contact information for awarding official of the Pass-through entity; (xi) CFDA Number and Name; the pass-through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each Federal award and the CFDA number at time of disbursement; (xii) Identification of whether the award is R&D; and (xiii) Indirect cost rate for the Federal award (including if the de minimis rate is charged per § 200.414 Indirect (F&A) costs).” 2 CFR § 200.303(a) states in part: “The non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award.” Management Response Contact Person: Tammy Smith, Senior Director of Federal Programs Anticipated Completion Date: September 1, 2026 Corrective Action Planned: The Oklahoma State Department of Education agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan located in the corrective action plan section of this report.
FINDING NO: 2024-025- Improve Subrecipient Monitoring (Repeat 2023-006) STATE AGENCY: Oklahoma Department of Human Services (DHS) FEDERAL AGENCY: Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) ALN: 93.658 FEDERAL PROGRAM NAME: Foster Care – Titel IV-E FEDERAL AWARD NUMBER: 2301 OKFOST and 2401 OKFOST FEDERAL AWARD YEAR: 2023 and 2024 CONTROL CATEGORY: Subrecipient Monitoring QUESTIONED COSTS: $0 Condition and Context: We judgmentally selected 2 of the 11 subrecipients (18.18%) to determine whether controls were designed and implemented to ensure a risk assessment of the subrecipient was performed by the Pass-Through Entity (PTE) and noted the following: For 2 subrecipients (100%), we determined a risk assessment was performed based on previous year’s performance to determine the appropriate subrecipient monitoring of each subrecipient; however, the date the risk assessments were performed are not documented, the award amount on the risk assessment equals the amount of funds paid during SFY24, and the line items Results of Single Audit are dated in July 2024. We randomly selected 4 of the 11 subrecipients (36.36%) to determine if all requirements imposed by the PTE on the subrecipient so that the federal award was used in accordance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award (2 CFR section 200.331(a)(2)); and any additional requirements that the PTE imposed on the subrecipient in order for the PTE to meet its own responsibility for the federal award and we noted: • Two of four (50%) subawards, cost allocation plans were not received per the contract. • Four of four (100%) subawards, the statement of work had insufficient detail to determine if deliverables were met. For both of our samples, we reviewed the subrecipient contracts to determine whether they included information required in accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(b) and we noted: • Two of six (33.33%) subawards did not include the subrecipient name and unique entity identifier • Six of six (100%) subawards did not include the Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN) • Six of six (100%) subawards did not include the Federal Award Date • One of six (17%) subawards did not include the Federal Award project description • Two of six (33.33%) subawards did not include the name of Federal awarding agency, pass through entity (PTE), and PTE awarding official contact information in the award document • One of six (16.67%) subawards did not include the ALN (Assistance Listings number) and title as required on the contract • Six of six (100%) subawards did not include identification of whether the award was for Research & Development • Three of six (50%) subawards did not include an indirect cost rate negotiated between the subrecipient and the Federal Government and also did not include an appropriate rate determined by the PTE in collaboration with the subrecipient. Cause: Management does not properly understand the program requirements. This is a prior audit finding dating back to SFY2017; however, DHS Management has shown some corrective action has been implemented to address identifying the award and applicable requirements and monitoring as required in 2 CFR 200.332. DHS does not have adequate controls in place to properly monitor subrecipients to ensure the contractual obligations are met. Effect: DHS is not in compliance with the monitoring requirements for this program. Therefore, subrecipients may not administer federal funds in accordance with program requirements. Recommendation: We recommend DHS further modify its subrecipient agreements and related documentation to ensure all required award information is provided and that any additional requirements imposed by DHS in their subrecipient agreements are complied with. Further, the contract should explicitly state the program duties to be performed by the subrecipient. Additionally, we recommend DHS perform risk assessments on all subrecipients at the start of the fiscal year to determine the level of monitoring necessary. Criteria: 45 CFR §75.303(a) states in part: “The Non-Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).” Per 2 CFR §200.1 Definitions defines subaward as “Subaward means an award provided by a pass-through entity to a subrecipient for the subrecipient to carry out part of a federal award received by the pass-through entity. It does not include payments to a contractor or payments to an individual that is a beneficiary of a federal program. A subaward may be provided through any form of legal agreement, including an agreement that the pass-through entity considers a contract [emphasis added].” 2 CFR §200.332 Requirements for pass-through entities states in part “All pass-through entities must: … (b) Ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the following information at the time of the subaward and if any of these data elements change, include the changes in subsequent subaward modification. When some of this information is not available, the pass-through entity must provide the best information available to describe the Federal award and subaward. Required information includes: (1) Federal award identification. (i) Subrecipient name (which must match the name associated with its unique entity identifier); (ii) Subrecipient's unique entity identifier; (iii) Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN); (iv) Federal Award Date (see the definition of Federal award date in § 200.1 of this part) of award to the recipient by the Federal agency; (v) Subaward Period of Performance Start and End Date; (vi) Subaward Budget Period Start and End Date; (vii) Amount of Federal Funds Obligated by this action by the pass-through entity to the subrecipient; (viii) Total Amount of Federal Funds Obligated to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity including the current financial obligation; (ix) Total Amount of the Federal Award committed to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity; (x) Federal award project description, as required to be responsive to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA); (xi) Name of Federal awarding agency, pass-through entity, and contact information for awarding official of the Pass-through entity; (xii) Assistance Listings title and number; the pass-through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each Federal award and the Assistance Listings Number at time of disbursement; (xiii) Identification of whether the award is R&D; and (xiv) Indirect cost rate for the Federal award (including if the de minimis rate is charged) per § 200.414. (2) All requirements imposed by the pass-through entity on the subrecipient so that the Federal award is used in accordance with Federal statutes, regulations and the terms and conditions of the Federal award; (3) Any additional requirements that the pass-through entity imposes on the subrecipient for the passthrough entity to meet its responsibilities under the Federal award. This includes information and certifications (see § 200.415) required for submitting financial and performance reports that the pass-through entity must provide to the Federal agency; (4) Indirect cost rate: (i) An approved indirect cost rate negotiated between the subrecipient and the Federal Government. If no approved rate exists, a pass-through entity must determine the appropriate rate in collaboration with the subrecipient. (c) Evaluate each subrecipient's risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring described in paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section, which may include consideration of such factors as: (1) The subrecipient's prior experience with the same or similar subawards; (2) The results of previous audits including whether or not the subrecipient receives a Single Audit in accordance with Subpart F of this part, and the extent to which the same or similar subaward has been audited as a major program; (3) Whether the subrecipient has new personnel or new or substantially changed systems; and (4) The extent and results of Federal awarding agency monitoring (e.g., if the subrecipient also receives Federal awards directly from a federal awarding agency) … (e) Monitor the activities of a subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subrecipient complies with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward. The pass-through entity is responsible for monitoring the overall performance of a subrecipient to ensure that the goals and objectives of the subaward are achieved. In monitoring a subrecipient, a pass-through entity must: (1) Review financial and performance reports.” Paragraph 7 of the agency’s subrecipient contract states in part “Sub-Recipient will provide a cost allocation plan to OKDHS within thirty (30) calendar days of this Agreement being signed. In the event there are any changes to the Cost Allocation Methodology, Sub-Recipient will notify OKDHS of those changes before submitting any affected quarterly claim invoice. Views of Responsible Official(s) Contact Person: Kayla Urtz, Director of Internal Audit Anticipated Completion Date: 9/30/2026 Corrective Action Planned: The Department of Human Services agrees with the finding. Please see the corrective action plan located in the corrective action plan section of this report.
FINDING NO: 2024-094 Strengthen Internal Controls Over SEFA Reporting STATE AGENCY: Oklahoma Department of Emergency Management FEDERAL AGENCY: Department of Homeland Security - Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) ALN: 97.036 FEDERAL PROGRAM NAME: Disaster Grants – Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters) FEDERAL AWARD NUMBER: 4222-PA, 4299-PA, 4315-PA, 4438-PA, 4453-PA, 4530-PA, 4575-PA, 4587-PA, 4706-PA, 4721-PA, 4776-PA FEDERAL AWARD YEAR: 2024 CONTROL CATEGORY: Reporting QUESTIONED COSTS: $0 Condition and Context: In auditing the GAAP Package Z – Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) for the Public Assistance (#97.036) grant for SFY 2024, we noted the following variances when reconciling to the data per the Statewide Accounting System (SAS): Category on SEFA Reported Total Total per SAS Federal Expenditures $89,489,594 $92,273,127 Federal Revenue $103,468,303 $92,451,686 Cause: The Agency Business Services (ABS) division within the Office of Management and Enterprise Services (OMES) prepared the SEFA, and OEM staff did not implement management review controls designed to ensure all required data elements were accurate and included on the SEFA. Additionally, OEM did not maintain supporting documentation for the revenues and expenditures reported on the SEFA and was unable to obtain the information from ABS during our audit. Effect: The amounts reported on OEM’s SFY 2024 SEFA for ALN 97.036 overstated Federal Revenue by $11,016,617 and understated Federal Expenditures by $2,783,533. Additionally, due to the lack of a detailed review of the SEFA performed by OEM, there is an insufficient level of assurance as to the accuracy of the SEFA, diminishing the reliability of the report and increasing the risk of material noncompliance. Recommendation: We recommend the OEM strengthen its management review controls to ensure GAAP Packages are accurately completed and reported to OMES, and that all supporting documentation is properly obtained and retained. We further recommend OEM assess and address training needs for staff responsible for reviewing the SEFA: staff should have a clear understanding of the SEFA reporting elements and how those requirements relate to the underlying expenditure or revenue data. Criteria: 2 CFR §3002.10 - Adoption of 2 CFR Part 200 States in part “the Department of Homeland Security adopts the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Guidance in 2 CFR part 200. Thus, this part gives regulatory effect to the OMB guidance and supplements the guidance as needed for the Department.” 2 CFR §200.303 - Internal controls states in part, “The Non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award.” 2 CFR §200.502 (a) states, “Determining Federal awards expended. The determination of when a Federal award is expended must be based on when the activity related to the Federal award occurs. Generally, the activity pertains to events that require the non-Federal entity to comply with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of Federal awards, such as: expenditure/expense transactions associated with awards including grants, cost reimbursement contracts under the FAR, compacts with Indian Tribes, cooperative agreements, and direct appropriations; the disbursement of funds to subrecipients; the use of loan proceeds under loan and loan guarantee programs; the receipt of property; the receipt of surplus property; the receipt or use of program income; the distribution or use of food commodities; the disbursement of amounts entitling the non-Federal entity to an interest subsidy; and the period when insurance is in force.” 2 CFR §200.510 (b) states, “Schedule of expenditures of Federal awards. The auditee must also prepare a schedule of expenditures of Federal awards for the period covered by the auditee's financial statements which must include the total Federal awards expended as determined in accordance with § 200.502. While not required, the auditee may choose to provide information requested by Federal awarding agencies and pass-through entities to make the schedule easier to use. For example, when a Federal program has multiple Federal award years, the auditee may list the amount of Federal awards expended for each Federal award year separately. At a minimum, the schedule must: (1) List individual Federal programs by Federal agency. For a cluster of programs, provide the cluster name, list individual Federal programs within the cluster of programs, and provide the applicable Federal agency name. For R&D, total Federal awards expended must be shown either by individual Federal award or by Federal agency and major subdivision within the Federal agency. For example, the National Institutes of Health is a major subdivision in the Department of Health and Human Services. (2) For Federal awards received as a subrecipient, the name of the pass-through entity and identifying number assigned by the pass-through entity must be included. (3) Provide total Federal awards expended for each individual Federal program and the Assistance Listings Number or other identifying number when the Assistance Listings information is not available. For a cluster of programs also provide the total for the cluster. … (4) Include the total amount provided to subrecipients from each Federal program. (5) For loan or loan guarantee programs described in § 200.502(b), identify in the notes to the schedule the balances outstanding at the end of the audit period. This is in addition to including the total Federal awards expended for loan or loan guarantee programs in the schedule. (6) Include notes that describe that significant accounting policies used in preparing the schedule, and note whether or not the auditee elected to use the 10% de minimis cost rate as covered in § 200.414.” Management Response: The agency concurs with the finding. Please see the corrective action plan located in the corrective action plan section of this report.
Material Weakness/Noncompliance – Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards 2 CFR § 200.510(b) states, in part, that the auditee must prepare a schedule of expenditures of Federal awards for the period covered by the auditee's financial statements which must include the total Federal awards expended as determined in accordance with §200.502 Basis for determining Federal awards expended. At a minimum, the schedule must: 1) List individual federal programs by Federal agency. For a cluster of programs, provide the cluster name, list individual Federal programs within the cluster of programs, and provide the applicable Federal agency name. For R&D, total Federal awards expended must be shown either by individual Federal award or by Federal agency and major subdivision within the Federal agency. 2) For Federal awards received as a subrecipient, the name of the pass-through entity and identifying number assigned by the pass-through entity must be included. 3) Provide total Federal awards expended for each individual Federal program and the Assistance Listing Number or other identifying number when the Assistance Listings information is not available. For a cluster of programs also provide the total for the cluster. 4) Include the total amount provided to subrecipients from each Federal program. 5) For loan or loan guarantee programs described in §200.502(b), identify in the notes to the schedule the balances outstanding at the end of the audit period. This is in addition to including the total Federal awards expended for loan or loan guarantee programs in the schedule. 6) Include notes that describe that significant accounting policies used in preparing the schedule, and note whether or not the auditee elected to use the 10% de minimis cost rate as covered in §200.414. A component of internal controls is to monitor individual programs throughout the year and to properly track and report the related amounts on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards. The School District did prepare a Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards; however, due to inadequate policies and procedures, total federal expenditures were understated by $744,309. Adjustments were made to the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards. Inaccurate completion of the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards could lead to inaccurate reporting of federal expenditures by the School District and could jeopardize future federal funding. We recommend the School District review/update their current policies and procedures, including, prior to submitting the federal schedule to the auditors, a second review of data, support and amounts be reported, to help ensure accurate information is provided. Officials' Response: See Corrective Action Plan
Reference Number: 2024-004 Federal Program Titles: Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) Foster Care – Title IV-E Federal Assistance Listing Numbers: 93.558 93.658 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Pass-Through Entity: California Department of Social Services Federal Award Number and Year: N/A Name of County Department: Health and Human Services Category of Finding: Subrecipient Monitoring Material Noncompliance and Material Weakness Criteria In accordance with Title 2 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) § 200.332, all pass-through entities (PTE) must: (a) Verify that the subrecipient is not excluded or disqualified in accordance with § 180.300. Verification methods are provided in § 180.300, which include confirming in SAM.gov that a potential subrecipient is not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from receiving Federal funds. (b) Ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the information provided below. A pass-through entity must provide the best available information when some of the information below is unavailable. A pass-through entity must provide the unavailable information when it is obtained. Required information includes: (1) Federal award identification. (i) Subrecipient’s name (must match the name associated with its unique entity identifier); (ii) Subrecipient's unique entity identifier; (iii) Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN); (iv) Federal Award Date; (v) Subaward Period of Performance Start and End Date; (vi) Subaward Budget Period Start and End Date; (vii) Amount of Federal Funds Obligated in the subaward; (viii) Total Amount of Federal Funds Obligated to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity, including the current financial obligation; (ix) Total Amount of the Federal Award committed to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity; (x) Federal award project description, as required by the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA); (xi) Name of the Federal agency, pass-through entity, and contact information for awarding official of the pass-through entity; (xii) Assistance Listings title and number; the pass-through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each Federal award and the Assistance Listings Number at the time of disbursement; (xiii) Identification of whether the Federal award is for research and development; and (xiv) Indirect cost rate for the Federal award (including if the de minimis rate is used in accordance with § 200.414). (2) All requirements of the subaward, including requirements imposed by Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award; (3) Any additional requirements that the pass-through entity imposes on the subrecipient for the pass-through entity to meet its responsibilities under the Federal award. This includes information and certifications (see § 200.415) required for submitting financial and performance reports that the pass-through entity must provide to the Federal agency; (4) Indirect cost rate: (i) An approved indirect cost rate negotiated between the subrecipient and the Federal Government. If no approved rate exists, a pass-through entity must determine the appropriate rate in collaboration with the subrecipient. The indirect cost rate may be either: (A) An indirect cost rate negotiated between the pass-through entity and the subrecipient. These rates may be based on a prior negotiated rate between a different pass-through entity and the subrecipient, in which case the pass-through entity is not required to collect information justifying the rate but may elect to do so; or (B) The de minimis indirect cost rate. (ii) The pass-through entity must not require the use of the de minimis indirect cost rate if the subrecipient has an approved indirect cost rate negotiated with the Federal Government. Subrecipients may elect to use the cost allocation method to account for indirect costs in accordance with § 200.405(d). (5) A requirement that the subrecipient permit the pass-through entity and auditors to access the subrecipient’s records and financial statements for the pass-through entity to fulfill its monitoring requirements; and (6) Appropriate terms and conditions concerning the closeout of the subaward. (c) Evaluate each subrecipient’s fraud risk and risk of noncompliance with a subaward to determine the appropriate subrecipient monitoring described in paragraph (f) of this section. When evaluating a subrecipient’s risk, a pass-through entity should consider the following: (1) The subrecipient’s prior experience with the same or similar subawards; (2) The results of previous audits. This includes considering whether or not the subrecipient receives a Single Audit in accordance with subpart F and the extent to which the same or similar subawards have been audited as a major program; (3) Whether the subrecipient has new personnel or new or substantially changed systems; and (4) The extent and results of any Federal agency monitoring (for example, if the subrecipient also receives Federal awards directly from the Federal agency). (d) If appropriate, consider implementing specific conditions in a subaward as described in § 200.208 and notify the Federal agency of the specific conditions. (e) Monitor the activities of a subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subrecipient complies with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward. The pass-through entity is responsible for monitoring the overall performance of a subrecipient to ensure that the goals and objectives of the subaward are achieved. In monitoring a subrecipient, a pass-through entity must: (1) Review financial and performance reports. (2) Ensure that the subrecipient takes corrective action on all significant developments that negatively affect the subaward. Significant developments include Single Audit findings related to the subaward, other audit findings, site visits, and written notifications from a subrecipient of adverse conditions which will impact their ability to meet the milestones or the objectives of a subaward. When significant developments negatively impact the subaward, a subrecipient must provide the pass-through entity with information on their plan for corrective action and any assistance needed to resolve the situation. (3) Issue a management decision for audit findings pertaining only to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity as required by § 200.521. (4) Resolve audit findings specifically related to the subaward. However, the pass-through entity is not responsible for resolving cross-cutting audit findings that apply to the subaward and other Federal awards or subawards. If a subrecipient has a current Single Audit report and has not been excluded from receiving Federal funding (meaning, has not been debarred or suspended), the pass-through entity may rely on the subrecipient’s cognizant agency for audit or oversight agency for audit to perform audit follow-up and make management decisions related to cross-cutting audit findings in accordance with section § 200.513(a)(4)(viii). Such reliance does not eliminate the responsibility of the pass-through entity to issue subawards that conform to agency and award-specific requirements, to manage risk through ongoing subaward monitoring, and to monitor the status of the findings that are specifically related to the subaward. (f) Depending upon the pass-through entity’s assessment of the risk posed by the subrecipient (as described in paragraph (c) of this section), the following monitoring tools may be useful for the pass-through entity to ensure proper accountability and compliance with program requirements and achievement of performance goals: (1) Providing subrecipients with training and technical assistance on program-related matters; (2) Performing site visits to review the subrecipient’s program operations; and (3) Arranging for agreed-upon-procedures engagements as described in § 200.425. (g) Verify that a subrecipient is audited as required by subpart F of this part. (h) Consider whether the results of a subrecipient’s audit, site visits, or other monitoring necessitate adjustments to the pass-through entity’s records. (i) Consider taking enforcement action against noncompliant subrecipients as described in § 200.339 and in program regulations. Condition During our audit of the TANF and Foster Care programs, we noted that the draft schedule of expenditures of federal awards did not include expenditures passed through to subrecipients. Upon inquiry, program management did not have a clear understanding of the difference between a subrecipient and a contractor and, as a result, had not identified, reported on, or monitored subrecipients. Subsequently, using the criteria in 2 CFR § 200.331 Subrecipient and contractor determinations, program management performed an analysis of payments made to contractors and identified the following: • TANF: two entities that received a total of $293,289 in payments during FY2023-24. • Foster Care: two entities that received a total of $139,607 in payments during FY2023-24. Of these we sampled two subrecipients from TANF and one subrecipient from Foster Care. Because program management did not previously identify any entities as subrecipients, the County did not comply with the requirements of subrecipient monitoring as follows: Both TANF and Foster Care: • The County could not demonstrate that a verification was performed to determine that the entities were not excluded or disqualified from receiving federal funds for all three subrecipients. While one entity’s contract included reference to 2 CFR Part 376 Nonprocurement, Debarment and Suspension, it did not specifically include a self-certification clause. • TANF Contracts: One contract was deficient and did not identify the contract as a federally funded subaward and did not include the required elements outlined in § 200.332 (b). The contract for the other entity was more prescriptive and included most of the elements in § 200.332 (b) but also did not have current language referencing the Uniform Guidance, which was effective in 2014 (Contract date was December 4, 2019), and instead referred to outdated requirements under OMB Circular A-133. One contract did not address indirect costs. One contract did not address provisions to permit the County as the grantor to access the entity’s records to audit or fulfill other monitoring responsibilities. Both contracts did not address the terms and conditions concerning the closeout of subawards. Both TANF and Foster Care: • The County did not perform the required fraud risk and risk of noncompliance assessment to determine the appropriate level of monitoring. • The County has not developed and documented a formal subrecipient monitoring plan. Upon inquiry, program management provided a bulleted list of their monitoring activities; however, reviews, meetings, action items, and follow-up were not formally documented to demonstrate the activities were performed. • The County received single audit reports from the two subrecipients identified; however, the County did not reconcile the amounts reported to its records. Foster Care TANF #1 TANF #2 Total Subrecipient’s SEFA $ 0 $ 101,886 $ 232,499 $ 334,385 County SEFA 105,530 43,689 249,560 399,884 Variance (105,530) 58,197 (17,601) (65,499) Cause Program staff were not aware of the requirements to evaluate and classify entities as contractor or subrecipient and did not understand the need to formalize a subrecipient monitoring program in accordance with §200.332. The cause can be partially contributed to turnover in the County’s Health and Human Services Department. Effect Failure to evaluate and identify subrecipients will cause the County to be out of compliance with its oversight responsibilities resulting in the potential for federal funds to be used inappropriately. Failure to provide all the required subaward information may result in subrecipients incorrectly reporting on federal pass-through awards in their Single Audit reports. Failure to have a formal monitoring program that includes risk assessment will result in the County inadequately monitoring the activities of subrecipients and hold them accountable to complete corrective action plans for identified noncompliance. Questioned Costs None. Context Fiscal year 2024 payments to the subrecipients were as listed: • TANF - $293,289 or 9% of total program expenditures. • Foster Care - $139,607 or 6% of total program expenditures. The sample was not a statistically valid sample. Identification as a Repeat Finding Previously reported as Finding 2023-003. Recommendation We recommend the County consider the following: 1. Provide comprehensive training to program managers on how to assess if an entity meets the criteria of a subrecipient as defined in § 200.331. 2. Formalize a subrecipient monitoring program based on the criteria in § 200.332. 3. Design a subrecipient agreement template to include all the elements required by 2 CFR § 200.332(b). Incorporate the use of the template in the contracting requirements for all departments receiving federal funds. 4. For existing subrecipients that were not provided the required elements, provide a letter or amended agreement to include all the required elements of 2 CFR § 200.332(b).
FINDING 2023-001 Program Information: Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (ALN #93.558) Criteria or Specific Requirement (Including Statutory, Regulatory or Other Citation): L. Reporting- The auditee must prepare a schedule of expenditures of Federal awards (the “SEFA”) for the period covered by the auditee’s financial statements which must include the total Federal awards expended as determined in accordance with 2 CFR 200.502 Basis for determining Federal awards expended. At a minimum, the schedule must: (1) List individual Federal programs by Federal agency. For a cluster of programs, provide the cluster name, list individual Federal programs within the cluster of programs, and provide the applicable Federal agency name. For Research and Development (“R&D”), total Federal awards expended must be shown either by individual Federal award or by Federal agency and major subdivision within the Federal agency. (2) For Federal awards received as a subrecipient, the name of the passthrough entity and identifying number assigned by the pass-through entity must be included. (3) Provide total Federal awards expended for each individual Federal program and the Assistance Listing number or other identifying number when the Assistance Listing information is not available. For a cluster of programs also provide the total for the cluster. (4) Include the total amount provided to subrecipients from each Federal program. (5) For loan or loan guarantee programs described in 2 CFR 200.502(b), identify in the notes to the schedule the balances outstanding at the end of the audit period. This is in addition to including the total Federal awards expended for loan or loan guarantee programs in the schedule. (6) Include notes that describe that significant accounting policies used in preparing the schedule and note whether or not the auditee elected to use the 10% de minimis cost rate as covered in 2 CFR 200.414. Condition: The SEFA as prepared by management did not originally include all expenditures for one federal grant. Cause: The Organization has a process where administrative expenses and management travel expenses are charged to a general fund code. A portion of those expenses related to the TANF program are then reclassed to the TANF fund code. We note some of those administrative and travel expenses did not get reclassed into the TANF fund code and as a result, the draft SEFA was not fully complete. Effect or Potential Effect: The original draft SEFA was incomplete. Questioned Costs: None. Context: During the process to compile and prepare the draft SEFA, certain administrative and travel costs were excluded from the draft SEFA, which resulted in the SEFA being understated by approximately $14,000. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Similar findings noted in the prior year. Recommendation: We recommend that the Alliance enhance its procedures and internal controls with respect to general ledger coding of expenses, preparation and review of the SEFA. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management will review SEFA for proper inclusion of all federal grant expenditures, and Alliance Director will ensure all invoices are properly coded to grants as applicable.
FINDING 2023-003 Subject: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds - Subrecipient Monitoring Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Federal Program: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listings Number: 21.027 Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): FY 2023 Compliance Requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2022-005. Condition and Context The County received a total State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF) allocation of $13,177,707. During the audit period, the County provided subawards of SLFRF funds to other entities. As a pass-through entity, the County must: Identify the award and the applicable requirements to each subrecipient. Evaluate each subrecipient's risk of noncompliance for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring related to the subaward. Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for an authorized purpose, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward, and achieves performance goals. Subawards, totaling $290,000, were provided to two different entities. Both subrecipient agreements associated with the subawards were selected for testing. For the two agreements tested, the following information was incomplete or missing: The federal award identification number (FAIN). The federal award date of award to the recipient by the federal agency. The name of the federal awarding agency, pass-through entity (auditee), and contact information for awarding official of the pass-through entity (auditee). The Assistance Listings Number and Title; the pass-through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each federal award and the Assistance Listings Number at time of disbursement. Furthermore, the County did not have an evaluation of the subrecipients' risk of noncompliance or monitoring activities demonstrating compliance with the subrecipient monitoring requirement. The County did not request any financial or audit documentation from the subrecipients. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 21 BOONE COUNTY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.331(a) states: "Subrecipients. A subaward is for the purpose of carrying out a portion of a Federal award and creates a Federal assistance relationship with the subrecipient. See definition for Subaward in § 200.1 of this part. Characteristics which support the classification of the non-Federal entity as a subrecipient include when the non-Federal entity: (1) Determines who is eligible to receive what Federal assistance; (2) Has its performance measured in relation to whether objectives of a Federal program were met; (3) Has responsibility for programmatic decision-making; (4) Is responsible for adherence to applicable Federal program requirements specified in the Federal award; and (5) In accordance with its agreement, uses the Federal funds to carry out a program for a public purpose specified in authorizing statute, as opposed to providing goods or services for the benefit of the pass-through entity." 2 CFR 200.332 states in part: "All pass-through entities must: (a) Ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the following information at the time of the subaward . . . (1) Federal award identification. (i) Subrecipient name (which must match the name associated with its unique entity identifier); (ii) Subrecipient's unique entity identifier; (iii) Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN); (iv) Federal Award Date (see the definition of Federal award date in § 200.1 of this part) of award to the recipient by the Federal agency; INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 22 BOONE COUNTY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (v) Subaward Period of Performance Start and End Date; (vi) Subaward Budget Period Start and End Date; (vii) Amount of Federal Funds Obligated by this action by the pass-through entity to the subrecipient; (viii) Total Amount of Federal Funds Obligated to the subrecipient by the passthrough entity including the current financial obligation; (ix) Total Amount of the Federal Award committed to the subrecipient by the passthrough entity; (x) Federal award project description, as required to be responsive to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA); (xi) Name of Federal awarding agency, pass-through entity, and contact information for awarding official of the Pass-through entity; (xii) Assistance Listings number and Title; the pass-through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each Federal award and the Assistance Listings Number at time of disbursement; (xiii) Identification of whether the award is R&D; and (xiv) Indirect cost rate for the Federal award (including if the de minimis rate is charged) per § 200.414. (2) All requirements imposed by the pass-through entity on the subrecipient so that the Federal award is used in accordance with Federal statutes, regulations and the terms and conditions of the Federal award; (3) Any additional requirements that the pass-through entity imposes on the subrecipient in order for the pass-through entity to meet its own responsibility to the Federal awarding agency including identification of any required financial and performance reports; (4) (i) An approved federally recognized indirect cost rate negotiated between the subrecipient and the Federal Government. If no approved rate exists, the passthrough entity must determine the appropriate rate in collaboration with the subrecipient, which is either: (A) The negotiated indirect cost rate between the pass-through entity and the subrecipient; which can be based on a prior negotiated rate between a different PTE and the same subrecipient. If basing the rate on a previously negotiated rate, the pass-through entity is not required to collect information justifying this rate, but may elect to do so; (B) The de minimis indirect cost rate. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 23 BOONE COUNTY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (ii) The pass-through entity must not require use of a de minimis indirect cost rate if the subrecipient has a Federally approved rate. Subrecipients can elect to use the cost allocation method to account for indirect costs in accordance with § 200.405(d). (5) A requirement that the subrecipient permit the pass-through entity and auditors to have access to the subrecipient's records and financial statements as necessary for the pass-through entity to meet the requirements of this part; and (6) Appropriate terms and conditions concerning closeout of the subaward. (b) Evaluate each subrecipient's risk of noncompliance with Federal statues, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determined the appropriate subrecipient monitoring . . . (d) Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: (1) Reviewing financial and performance reports required by the pass-through entity. (2) Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity detected through audits, on-site reviews, and written confirmation from the subrecipient, highlighting the status of actions planned or taken to address Single Audit findings related to the particular subaward. (3) Issuing a management decision for applicable audit findings pertaining only to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity as required by § 200.521. (4) The pass-through entity is responsible for resolving audit findings specifically related to the subaward and not responsible for resolving crosscutting findings. . . ." Cause The system of internal controls as established by the management of the County was not properly designed nor implemented. The County was unable to provide documentation that monitoring procedures were in place over subrecipients. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the County cannot be sure subrecipients are provided an adequate subaward agreement, with all required elements and are adequately monitored. As such, subaward agreements entered into by the County did not include all the required elements. In addition, the County did not properly monitor the non-profit to ensure proper spending of the federal funds. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the County. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 24 BOONE COUNTY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the County design and implement a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure subrecipients are provided with an adequate subaward agreement and monitored as appropriate. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
Federal Agency: Department of Justice Federal Assistance Listing Number: 16.756 Program: Court Appointed Special Advocates Award Number: 15JDP-21-GK-02762-CASA Criteria: The Uniform Guidance in 2 CFR §200.332 details requirements for pass-through entities in regard to subrecipient monitoring and management. Per 2 CFR §200.332, Requirements for Pass-Through Entities: “All pass-through entities must: (a) Ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the following information at the time of the subaward and if any of these data elements change, include the changes in subsequent subaward modification. When some of this information is not available, the pass-through entity must provide the best information available to describe the federal award and subaward. Required information includes: (1) Federal award identification. i. Subrecipient name (which must match the name associated with its unique entity identifier); ii. Subrecipient’s unique entity identifier; iii. Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN); iv. Federal Award Date (see the definition of federal award date in §200.1 of this part) of award to the recipient by the federal agency; v. Subaward Period of Performance Start and End Date; vi. Subaward Budget Period Start and End Date; vii. Amount of Federal Funds Obligated by this action by the pass-through entity to the subrecipient; viii. Total Amount of Federal Funds Obligated to the subrecipient by the pass through entity, including the current financial obligation; ix. Total Amount of the Federal Award committed to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity; x. Federal award project description, as required to be responsive to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA); xi. Name of federal awarding agency, pass-through entity, and contact information for awarding official of the Pass-through entity; xii. Assistance Listings Number and Title; the pass-through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each federal award and the Assistance Listings Number at time of disbursement; xiii. Identification of whether the award is R&D; and xiv. Indirect cost rate for the federal award (including if the de minimis rate is charged) per § 200.414. (2) All requirements imposed by the pass-through entity on the subrecipient so that the federal award is used in accordance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award; (3) Any additional requirements that the pass-through entity imposes on the subrecipient in order for the pass-through entity to meet its own responsibility to the federal awarding agency, including identification of any required financial and performance reports; (4) i. An approved federally recognized indirect cost rate negotiated between the subrecipient and the Federal Government. If no approved rate exists, the pass-through entity must determine the appropriate rate in collaboration with the subrecipient, which is either: (A) The negotiated indirect cost rate between the pass-through entity and the subrecipient, which can be based on a prior negotiated rate between a different PTE and the same subrecipient. If basing the rate on a previously negotiated rate, the pass-through entity is not required to collect information justifying this rate, but may elect to do so; (B) The de minimis indirect cost rate. ii. The pass-through entity must not require use of a de minimis indirect cost rate if the subrecipient has a federally approved rate. Subrecipients can elect to use the cost allocation method to account for indirect costs in accordance with §200.405(d). (5) A requirement that the subrecipient permits the pass-through entity and auditors to have access to the subrecipient’s records and financial statements as necessary for the pass-through entity to meet the requirements of this part; and (6) Appropriate terms and conditions concerning closeout of the subaward.” Condition: National CASA/GAL’s subrecipient agreements do not contain a level of specificity to fully comply with federal subrecipient regulations. During our testing of subrecipient monitoring, we selected 16 subrecipient awards. For all awards tested, National CASA/GAL’s subaward agreements did not comply with 2 CFR §200.332, Requirements for Pass-Through Entities, as they do not contain a specific scope of work or project description. Cause: National CASA/GAL did not have the proper policies and procedures in place to ensure subaward agreements complied to relevant federal regulation, and that all required elements are located in subaward agreements, and not in the application or by reference to other documents. Effect or Potential Effect: Without adequate controls in place to ensure conformity with subaward requirements, grantees may not ensure compliance with any award special conditions or revised budgets agreed upon at contract implementation. Questioned Costs: None. Context: This is a condition identified per review of National CASA/GAL’s compliance with specified requirements using a non-statistically valid sample. The population consisted of 79 subawards made totaling to $2,428,200 provided to subrecipients in 2023. The sample consisted of 16 subawards totaling $515,618 provided to subrecipients in 2023. Identification as a Repeat Finding: 2022-005. Recommendation: We recommend establishing and maintaining written policies and procedures to ensure subaward agreements conform to the requirements outlined in 2 CFR §200.332. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees that subrecipient agreements in place in 2022 did not fully comply with 2 CFR §200.332. Updates were made to the policies and procedures as well to ensure subaward files contain the requisite components. Management has additionally implemented a Grant Master File Checklist to ensure compliance with terms and conditions required in subaward agreements.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.332 notes, “All pass-through entities must: (a) Ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the following information at the time of the subaward and if any of these data elements change, include the changes in subsequent subaward modification. When some of this information is not available, the pass-through entity must provide the best information available to describe the Federal award and subaward. Required information includes: (1) Federal award identification. (i) Subrecipient name (which must match the name associated with its unique entity identifier); (ii) Subrecipient's unique entity identifier; (iii) Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN); (iv) Federal Award Date (see the definition of Federal award date in § 200.1 of this part) of award to the recipient by the Federal agency;(v) Subaward Period of Performance Start and End Date; (vi) Subaward Budget Period Start and End Date; (vii) Amount of Federal Funds Obligated by this action by the pass-through entity to the subrecipient; (viii) Total Amount of Federal Funds Obligated to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity including the current financial obligation; (ix) Total Amount of the Federal Award committed to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity; (x) Federal award project description, as required to be responsive to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA); (xi) Name of Federal awarding agency, pass-through entity, and contact information for awarding official of the Pass-through entity; (xii) Assistance Listings number and Title; the pass-through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each Federal award and the Assistance Listings Number at time of disbursement; (xiii) Identification of whether the award is R&D; and (xiv) Indirect cost rate for the Federal award (including if the de minimis rate is charged) per § 200.414. (2) All requirements imposed by the pass-through entity on the subrecipient so that the Federal award is used in accordance with Federal statutes, regulations and the terms and conditions of the Federal award; …” Condition: All three of the subawards selected for testing, the recipient’s UEI number was missing from the subaward. We consider this condition to be an instance of noncompliance relating to the Subrecipient Monitoring compliance requirement. Statistical sampling was not used in making sample selections. Questioned Costs :N/A Cause and effect: Without communication of the required information, subrecipients may overspend award amounts or incur unallowable expenses towards the grant. Recommendation: We recommend ACT evaluates policies and procedures to ensure all required information is communication with the subrecipient. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with this Single Audit Finding and response is included in the Corrective Action Plan.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.332 notes, “All pass-through entities must: (a) Ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the following information at the time of the subaward and if any of these data elements change, include the changes in subsequent subaward modification. When some of this information is not available, the pass-through entity must provide the best information available to describe the Federal award and subaward. Required information includes: (1) Federal award identification. (i) Subrecipient name (which must match the name associated with its unique entity identifier); (ii) Subrecipient's unique entity identifier; (iii) Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN); (iv) Federal Award Date (see the definition of Federal award date in § 200.1 of this part) of award to the recipient by the Federal agency;(v) Subaward Period of Performance Start and End Date; (vi) Subaward Budget Period Start and End Date; (vii) Amount of Federal Funds Obligated by this action by the pass-through entity to the subrecipient; (viii) Total Amount of Federal Funds Obligated to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity including the current financial obligation; (ix) Total Amount of the Federal Award committed to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity; (x) Federal award project description, as required to be responsive to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA); (xi) Name of Federal awarding agency, pass-through entity, and contact information for awarding official of the Pass-through entity; (xii) Assistance Listings number and Title; the pass-through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each Federal award and the Assistance Listings Number at time of disbursement; (xiii) Identification of whether the award is R&D; and (xiv) Indirect cost rate for the Federal award (including if the de minimis rate is charged) per § 200.414. (2) All requirements imposed by the pass-through entity on the subrecipient so that the Federal award is used in accordance with Federal statutes, regulations and the terms and conditions of the Federal award; …” Condition: All three of the subawards selected for testing, the recipient’s UEI number was missing from the subaward. We consider this condition to be an instance of noncompliance relating to the Subrecipient Monitoring compliance requirement. Statistical sampling was not used in making sample selections. Questioned Costs :N/A Cause and effect: Without communication of the required information, subrecipients may overspend award amounts or incur unallowable expenses towards the grant. Recommendation: We recommend ACT evaluates policies and procedures to ensure all required information is communication with the subrecipient. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with this Single Audit Finding and response is included in the Corrective Action Plan.
METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY (A Component Unit of the State of New York) SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS- FEDERAL AWARDS (CONTINUED) YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2023 Reference Number: 2023-001 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Homeland Security Federal Program: Rail and Transit Security Grant Program ALN Number: 97.075 Contract Number: FE2019-RA-00004; FE2020-RA-00005; FE2021-RA-00004; FE2022-RA-00006 Compliance Requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Type of Finding: Deficiency-Non-Compliance 1. CRITERIA Subrecipient Monitoring - As stated in Uniform Grant Guidance - §200.331 Requirements for pass-through entities, all pass-through entities must: Ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the following information at the time of the subaward and if any of these data elements change, include the changes in subsequent subaward modification. When some of this information is not available, the pass-through entity must provide the best information available to describe the Federal award and subaward. Required information includes: • Subrecipient name (which must match the name associated with its unique entity identifier); • Subrecipient’s unique entity identifier; • Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN); • Assistance Listing Number (ALN) Number and Name; the pass-through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each Federal award and the ALN number at time of disbursement; • Identification of whether the award is Research & Development; and • Indirect cost rate for the Federal award (including if the de minimis rate is charged per §200.414 Indirect (F&A) costs); 2. CONDITION/PERSPECTIVE Metropolitan Transportation Authority (“MTA”) has subrecipient monitoring procedures in place. MTA has corporate policies and procedures regarding subrecipient contracts. We reviewed Rail and Transit Security Grant Program’s subrecipient monitoring compliance. This program had one subrecipient. Based on our review of the subrecipient contract for this program, we noted that the subrecipient contract did not have all the required elements as stated in §200.331. 3. CAUSE MTA did not ensure that the contract between MTA and the subrecipient included the ALN and all other required elements as required by 2 CFR; §200.331. 4. EFFECT The Subrecipient may not identify an MTA contract as a federal program, and therefore may not follow the required federal award requirements. Additionally the subrecipient may not include the program in the Subrecipient’s schedule of expenditures of federal awards and the program may not be audited as part of the Subrecipient’s single audit. 5. REPEAT FINDING No 6. RECOMMENDATION We recommend that MTA implement policies and procedures to communicate the federal grant information to all subrecipients in accordance with Uniform Grant Guidance CFR 200.331 Subrecipient Requirements. 7. QUESTIONED COST None. 8. VIEWS OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL The MTA Office of Security is acknowledging the sub-recipient agreement did not include the ALN Number – 97.075, Identification of whether the award is R&D and Indirect cost rate for the Federal award (including if the de minimis rate is charged) per § 200.414 on the check list. The MTA does provide a copy of the award letter to our sub-recipient(s) and we perform yearly sub-recipient monitoring of our sub-recipient(s). Also, see “Corrective Action Plan”.
FINDING 2023-001 Program Information: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Projects (ALN #93.243) COVID-19 Education Stabilization Fund (ALN #84.425C) Criteria or Specific Requirement (Including Statutory, Regulatory or Other Citation): L. Reporting - The auditee must prepare a schedule of expenditures of Federal awards (the “SEFA”) for the period covered by the auditee’s financial statements which must include the total Federal awards expended as determined in accordance with 2 CFR 200.502 Basis for determining Federal awards expended. At a minimum, the schedule must: (1) List individual Federal programs by Federal agency. For a cluster of programs, provide the cluster name, list individual Federal programs within the cluster of programs, and provide the applicable Federal agency name. For Research and Development (“R&D”), total Federal awards expended must be shown either by individual Federal award or by Federal agency and major subdivision within the Federal agency. (2) For Federal awards received as a subrecipient, the name of the passthrough entity and identifying number assigned by the pass-through entity must be included. (3) Provide total Federal awards expended for each individual Federal program and the Assistance Listing number or other identifying number when the Assistance Listing information is not available. For a cluster of programs also provide the total for the cluster. (4) Include the total amount provided to subrecipients from each Federal program. (5) For loan or loan guarantee programs described in 2 CFR 200.502(b), identify in the notes to the schedule the balances outstanding at the end of the audit period. This is in addition to including the total Federal awards expended for loan or loan guarantee programs in the schedule. (6) Include notes that describe that significant accounting policies used in preparing the schedule and note whether or not the auditee elected to use the 10% de minimis cost rate as covered in 2 CFR 200.414. FINDING 2023-001 Program Information: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Projects (ALN #93.243) COVID-19 Education Stabilization Fund (ALN #84.425C) Criteria or Specific Requirement (Including Statutory, Regulatory or Other Citation): L. Reporting - The auditee must prepare a schedule of expenditures of Federal awards (the “SEFA”) for the period covered by the auditee’s financial statements which must include the total Federal awards expended as determined in accordance with 2 CFR 200.502 Basis for determining Federal awards expended. At a minimum, the schedule must: (1) List individual Federal programs by Federal agency. For a cluster of programs, provide the cluster name, list individual Federal programs within the cluster of programs, and provide the applicable Federal agency name. For Research and Development (“R&D”), total Federal awards expended must be shown either by individual Federal award or by Federal agency and major subdivision within the Federal agency. (2) For Federal awards received as a subrecipient, the name of the passthrough entity and identifying number assigned by the pass-through entity must be included. (3) Provide total Federal awards expended for each individual Federal program and the Assistance Listing number or other identifying number when the Assistance Listing information is not available. For a cluster of programs also provide the total for the cluster. (4) Include the total amount provided to subrecipients from each Federal program. (5) For loan or loan guarantee programs described in 2 CFR 200.502(b), identify in the notes to the schedule the balances outstanding at the end of the audit period. This is in addition to including the total Federal awards expended for loan or loan guarantee programs in the schedule. (6) Include notes that describe that significant accounting policies used in preparing the schedule and note whether or not the auditee elected to use the 10% de minimis cost rate as covered in 2 CFR 200.414. Condition: The SEFA, as prepared by management erroneously included expenditures previously incurred and reported in fiscal year 2022, resulting in an overstatement of $7,875 for the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Service Project. Additionally, COVID-19 Education Stabilization Fund expenditures were not complete, resulting in an understatement of $6,000 for the COVID-19 Education Stabilization Fund. Cause: Administrative oversight with respect to preparation of the SEFA. Effect or Potential Effect: The original draft SEFA was overstated. Questioned Costs: None Context: Due to an error in disbursing grant funds to an incorrect local club in fiscal year 2022, the Alliance attempted to correct this mistake by disbursing additional funds to the correct club in fiscal year 2023. The Alliance included the remedied disbursement on the 2023 SEFA, which resulted in a $7,875 overstatement of expenditures that had already been incurred and reported on the 2022 SEFA. The omission of costs allocated to the COVID-19 Education Stabilization Fund resulted in expenditures being understated by $6,000. Identification as a Repeat Finding: No similar findings noted in the prior year. Recommendation: We recommend that the Alliance enhance its procedures and internal controls with respect to preparation and review of the SEFA. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management will enhance procedures and internal controls with respect to the preparation and review of the SEFA, by reviewing the detail of expenses included in the prior year SEFA with current year expenses, to prevent duplicate entries being reported.
FINDING 2023-001 Program Information: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Projects (ALN #93.243) COVID-19 Education Stabilization Fund (ALN #84.425C) Criteria or Specific Requirement (Including Statutory, Regulatory or Other Citation): L. Reporting - The auditee must prepare a schedule of expenditures of Federal awards (the “SEFA”) for the period covered by the auditee’s financial statements which must include the total Federal awards expended as determined in accordance with 2 CFR 200.502 Basis for determining Federal awards expended. At a minimum, the schedule must: (1) List individual Federal programs by Federal agency. For a cluster of programs, provide the cluster name, list individual Federal programs within the cluster of programs, and provide the applicable Federal agency name. For Research and Development (“R&D”), total Federal awards expended must be shown either by individual Federal award or by Federal agency and major subdivision within the Federal agency. (2) For Federal awards received as a subrecipient, the name of the passthrough entity and identifying number assigned by the pass-through entity must be included. (3) Provide total Federal awards expended for each individual Federal program and the Assistance Listing number or other identifying number when the Assistance Listing information is not available. For a cluster of programs also provide the total for the cluster. (4) Include the total amount provided to subrecipients from each Federal program. (5) For loan or loan guarantee programs described in 2 CFR 200.502(b), identify in the notes to the schedule the balances outstanding at the end of the audit period. This is in addition to including the total Federal awards expended for loan or loan guarantee programs in the schedule. (6) Include notes that describe that significant accounting policies used in preparing the schedule and note whether or not the auditee elected to use the 10% de minimis cost rate as covered in 2 CFR 200.414. FINDING 2023-001 Program Information: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Projects (ALN #93.243) COVID-19 Education Stabilization Fund (ALN #84.425C) Criteria or Specific Requirement (Including Statutory, Regulatory or Other Citation): L. Reporting - The auditee must prepare a schedule of expenditures of Federal awards (the “SEFA”) for the period covered by the auditee’s financial statements which must include the total Federal awards expended as determined in accordance with 2 CFR 200.502 Basis for determining Federal awards expended. At a minimum, the schedule must: (1) List individual Federal programs by Federal agency. For a cluster of programs, provide the cluster name, list individual Federal programs within the cluster of programs, and provide the applicable Federal agency name. For Research and Development (“R&D”), total Federal awards expended must be shown either by individual Federal award or by Federal agency and major subdivision within the Federal agency. (2) For Federal awards received as a subrecipient, the name of the passthrough entity and identifying number assigned by the pass-through entity must be included. (3) Provide total Federal awards expended for each individual Federal program and the Assistance Listing number or other identifying number when the Assistance Listing information is not available. For a cluster of programs also provide the total for the cluster. (4) Include the total amount provided to subrecipients from each Federal program. (5) For loan or loan guarantee programs described in 2 CFR 200.502(b), identify in the notes to the schedule the balances outstanding at the end of the audit period. This is in addition to including the total Federal awards expended for loan or loan guarantee programs in the schedule. (6) Include notes that describe that significant accounting policies used in preparing the schedule and note whether or not the auditee elected to use the 10% de minimis cost rate as covered in 2 CFR 200.414. Condition: The SEFA, as prepared by management erroneously included expenditures previously incurred and reported in fiscal year 2022, resulting in an overstatement of $7,875 for the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Service Project. Additionally, COVID-19 Education Stabilization Fund expenditures were not complete, resulting in an understatement of $6,000 for the COVID-19 Education Stabilization Fund. Cause: Administrative oversight with respect to preparation of the SEFA. Effect or Potential Effect: The original draft SEFA was overstated. Questioned Costs: None Context: Due to an error in disbursing grant funds to an incorrect local club in fiscal year 2022, the Alliance attempted to correct this mistake by disbursing additional funds to the correct club in fiscal year 2023. The Alliance included the remedied disbursement on the 2023 SEFA, which resulted in a $7,875 overstatement of expenditures that had already been incurred and reported on the 2022 SEFA. The omission of costs allocated to the COVID-19 Education Stabilization Fund resulted in expenditures being understated by $6,000. Identification as a Repeat Finding: No similar findings noted in the prior year. Recommendation: We recommend that the Alliance enhance its procedures and internal controls with respect to preparation and review of the SEFA. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management will enhance procedures and internal controls with respect to the preparation and review of the SEFA, by reviewing the detail of expenses included in the prior year SEFA with current year expenses, to prevent duplicate entries being reported.
Program Information: Texas Statewide Youth Services Network Project (“SYSN”) (ALN #93.590) Criteria or Specific Requirement (Including Statutory, Regulatory or Other Citation): L. Reporting- The auditee must prepare a schedule of expenditures of Federal awards (the “SEFA”) for the period covered by the auditee’s financial statements which must include the total Federal awards expended as determined in accordance with 2 CFR 200.502 Basis for determining Federal awards expended. At a minimum, the schedule must: (1) List individual Federal programs by Federal agency. For a cluster of programs, provide the cluster name, list individual Federal programs within the cluster of programs, and provide the applicable Federal agency name. For Research and Development (“R&D”), total Federal awards expended must be shown either by individual Federal award or by Federal agency and major subdivision within the Federal agency. (2) For Federal awards received as a subrecipient, the name of the passthrough entity and identifying number assigned by the pass-through entity must be included. (3) Provide total Federal awards expended for each individual Federal program and the Assistance Listing number or other identifying number when the Assistance Listing information is not available. For a cluster of programs also provide the total for the cluster. (4) Include the total amount provided to subrecipients from each Federal program. (5) For loan or loan guarantee programs described in 2 CFR 200.502(b), identify in the notes to the schedule the balances outstanding at the end of the audit period. This is in addition to including the total Federal awards expended for loan or loan guarantee programs in the schedule. (6) Include notes that describe that significant accounting policies used in preparing the schedule and note whether or not the auditee elected to use the 10% de minimis cost rate as covered in 2 CFR 200.414. Condition: The SEFA, as prepared by management, did not originally bifurcate grant expenditures between state and federal funding sources for the SYSN grant. Cause: The Organization did not properly identify separate state and federal funding sources as stated on the Notice of Award for the grant. Effect or Potential Effect: The original draft SEFA did not properly present both state and federal programs for the SYSN grant. Questioned Costs: None. Context: During the process to prepare the draft SEFA, management did not properly identify separate funding sources for one grant resulting in improper presentation of certain federal expenditures as state expenditures on the draft SEFA. Identification as a Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend that the Alliance enhance its procedures and internal controls with respect to the preparation and review of the SEFA by comparing programs on the SEFA with corresponding grant agreements and notices of award. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Review all federal grant contracts to determine if any separate funding sources should be listed for total funds received.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name: Assistance Listing Number 93.600, Department of Health and Human Services, Head Start and Covid-19: Head Start ARP Federal Award Identification Number and Year: 05CH011937-03-03, 05HE000989-01-01 Pass-through Entity – N/A Finding Type – Significant deficiency in internal control over compliance Repeat Finding – No Criteria – Per 2 CFR 200.332 all pass-through entities must: (a) Ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the following information at the time of the subaward and if any of these data elements change, include the changes in subsequent subaward modification. When some of this information is not available, the pass-through entity must provide the best information available to describe the Federal award and subaward. Required information includes: (1) Federal award identification. (i) Subrecipient name (which must match the name associated with its unique entity identifier); (ii) Subrecipient's unique entity identifier; (iii) Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN); (iv) Federal Award Date (see the definition of Federal award date in § 200.1 of this part) of award to the recipient by the Federal agency; (v) Subaward Period of Performance Start and End Date; (vi) Subaward Budget Period Start and End Date; (vii) Amount of Federal Funds Obligated by this action by the pass-through entity to the subrecipient; (viii) Total Amount of Federal Funds Obligated to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity including the current financial obligation; (ix) Total Amount of the Federal Award committed to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity; (x) Federal award project description, as required by the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA); (xi) Name of the Federal agency, pass-through entity, and contact information for awarding official of the pass-through entity; (xii) Assistance Listings title and number; the pass-through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each Federal award and the Assistance Listings Number at the time of disbursement; (xiii) Identification of whether the Federal award is for research and development; and (xiv) Indirect cost rate for the Federal award (including if the de minimis rate is used in accordance with § 200.414) Condition – During our test work, we noted that 3 out of 3 subaward agreements tested did not include the information as noted in 2 CFR 200.332. The controls in place did not ensure that the required information as prescribed by 2 CFR 200.332, Requirements for Pass-through Entities, were included in the grant agreement of its subrecipient. Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed – N/A Questioned Costs – None Cause/Effect – The controls in place did not ensure that the required information as prescribed by 2 CFR 200.332, Requirements for Pass-through Entities, were included in the grant agreement of its subrecipient. As a result, required information was omitted. Recommendation – We recommend that management review its procedures and controls to ensure the required information as prescribed by 2 CFR 200.332, Requirements for Pass-through Entities, is included in all subawards to subrecipients. View of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan –The Agency agrees with the finding. When granting funds as a subaward to a pass-through entity, the Agency will update its master templates for subawards to include the required information. In addition, when the sub agreements are routed for signature and reviewed by the Chief Financial Officer, they will be double-checked to ensure compliance with this requirement.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name: Assistance Listing Number 93.600, Department of Health and Human Services, Head Start and Covid-19: Head Start ARP Federal Award Identification Number and Year: 05CH011937-03-03, 05HE000989-01-01 Pass-through Entity – N/A Finding Type – Significant deficiency in internal control over compliance Repeat Finding – No Criteria – Per 2 CFR 200.332 all pass-through entities must: (a) Ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the following information at the time of the subaward and if any of these data elements change, include the changes in subsequent subaward modification. When some of this information is not available, the pass-through entity must provide the best information available to describe the Federal award and subaward. Required information includes: (1) Federal award identification. (i) Subrecipient name (which must match the name associated with its unique entity identifier); (ii) Subrecipient's unique entity identifier; (iii) Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN); (iv) Federal Award Date (see the definition of Federal award date in § 200.1 of this part) of award to the recipient by the Federal agency; (v) Subaward Period of Performance Start and End Date; (vi) Subaward Budget Period Start and End Date; (vii) Amount of Federal Funds Obligated by this action by the pass-through entity to the subrecipient; (viii) Total Amount of Federal Funds Obligated to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity including the current financial obligation; (ix) Total Amount of the Federal Award committed to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity; (x) Federal award project description, as required by the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA); (xi) Name of the Federal agency, pass-through entity, and contact information for awarding official of the pass-through entity; (xii) Assistance Listings title and number; the pass-through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each Federal award and the Assistance Listings Number at the time of disbursement; (xiii) Identification of whether the Federal award is for research and development; and (xiv) Indirect cost rate for the Federal award (including if the de minimis rate is used in accordance with § 200.414) Condition – During our test work, we noted that 3 out of 3 subaward agreements tested did not include the information as noted in 2 CFR 200.332. The controls in place did not ensure that the required information as prescribed by 2 CFR 200.332, Requirements for Pass-through Entities, were included in the grant agreement of its subrecipient. Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed – N/A Questioned Costs – None Cause/Effect – The controls in place did not ensure that the required information as prescribed by 2 CFR 200.332, Requirements for Pass-through Entities, were included in the grant agreement of its subrecipient. As a result, required information was omitted. Recommendation – We recommend that management review its procedures and controls to ensure the required information as prescribed by 2 CFR 200.332, Requirements for Pass-through Entities, is included in all subawards to subrecipients. View of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan –The Agency agrees with the finding. When granting funds as a subaward to a pass-through entity, the Agency will update its master templates for subawards to include the required information. In addition, when the sub agreements are routed for signature and reviewed by the Chief Financial Officer, they will be double-checked to ensure compliance with this requirement.