2022-004: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control / Immaterial Noncompliance – Activities Allowed/Allowable Costs (repeat comment) Federal Program: WIOA Cluster (ALN 17.258/17.259/17.278), Employment Services Cluster (ALN 17.207/17.801), and Temporary Assistance for Needy Families Cluster (ALN 93.558) Criteria: Per 2 CFR 200.405, Allocable costs (a) states “a cost is allocable to a particular Federal award or other cost objective if the goods or services involved are chargeable or assignable to that Federal award or cost objective in accordance with relative benefits received.” Condition: Allocations of non-direct charged wage time (i.e., paid time off, bereavement, jury duty, holiday, medical paid time off, medical waivers) are managed through a labor allocation whereby amounts of non-direct charged wage time are charged to various programs incorrectly. Context: Allocations of non-direct charged wage time (i.e., paid time off, bereavement, jury duty, holiday, medical paid time off, medical waivers) are managed through a labor allocation which is completed by the accounting staff and communicated to the payroll company. This labor allocation is designed to spread the non-direct charged wage time to the same programs that the employee directly charges time. When an employee changes programs to which their time is directly charged the accounting staff is not notified by the staff but notes the change after the fact during reviews of payroll records. Once the change is noted, a new labor allocation is created and communicated to the payroll company which creates a lag in time whereby amounts of non-direct charged wage time are charged to various programs incorrectly. Cause: Limitation of current system being utilized to allocate payroll costs. Effect: Costs charged to the program may be considered unallowable if not allocated in a manner consistent with where the employee actually spends their time. Recommendation: The Consortium should adopt policies and procedures that require that allocations for labor to align with how the employee actually spends their time. Views of Responsible Officials: We agree with the finding. We have addressed the issues within the Consortium to properly allocate non-direct wage time.
2022-004: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control / Immaterial Noncompliance – Activities Allowed/Allowable Costs (repeat comment) Federal Program: WIOA Cluster (ALN 17.258/17.259/17.278), Employment Services Cluster (ALN 17.207/17.801), and Temporary Assistance for Needy Families Cluster (ALN 93.558) Criteria: Per 2 CFR 200.405, Allocable costs (a) states “a cost is allocable to a particular Federal award or other cost objective if the goods or services involved are chargeable or assignable to that Federal award or cost objective in accordance with relative benefits received.” Condition: Allocations of non-direct charged wage time (i.e., paid time off, bereavement, jury duty, holiday, medical paid time off, medical waivers) are managed through a labor allocation whereby amounts of non-direct charged wage time are charged to various programs incorrectly. Context: Allocations of non-direct charged wage time (i.e., paid time off, bereavement, jury duty, holiday, medical paid time off, medical waivers) are managed through a labor allocation which is completed by the accounting staff and communicated to the payroll company. This labor allocation is designed to spread the non-direct charged wage time to the same programs that the employee directly charges time. When an employee changes programs to which their time is directly charged the accounting staff is not notified by the staff but notes the change after the fact during reviews of payroll records. Once the change is noted, a new labor allocation is created and communicated to the payroll company which creates a lag in time whereby amounts of non-direct charged wage time are charged to various programs incorrectly. Cause: Limitation of current system being utilized to allocate payroll costs. Effect: Costs charged to the program may be considered unallowable if not allocated in a manner consistent with where the employee actually spends their time. Recommendation: The Consortium should adopt policies and procedures that require that allocations for labor to align with how the employee actually spends their time. Views of Responsible Officials: We agree with the finding. We have addressed the issues within the Consortium to properly allocate non-direct wage time.
2022-004: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control / Immaterial Noncompliance – Activities Allowed/Allowable Costs (repeat comment) Federal Program: WIOA Cluster (ALN 17.258/17.259/17.278), Employment Services Cluster (ALN 17.207/17.801), and Temporary Assistance for Needy Families Cluster (ALN 93.558) Criteria: Per 2 CFR 200.405, Allocable costs (a) states “a cost is allocable to a particular Federal award or other cost objective if the goods or services involved are chargeable or assignable to that Federal award or cost objective in accordance with relative benefits received.” Condition: Allocations of non-direct charged wage time (i.e., paid time off, bereavement, jury duty, holiday, medical paid time off, medical waivers) are managed through a labor allocation whereby amounts of non-direct charged wage time are charged to various programs incorrectly. Context: Allocations of non-direct charged wage time (i.e., paid time off, bereavement, jury duty, holiday, medical paid time off, medical waivers) are managed through a labor allocation which is completed by the accounting staff and communicated to the payroll company. This labor allocation is designed to spread the non-direct charged wage time to the same programs that the employee directly charges time. When an employee changes programs to which their time is directly charged the accounting staff is not notified by the staff but notes the change after the fact during reviews of payroll records. Once the change is noted, a new labor allocation is created and communicated to the payroll company which creates a lag in time whereby amounts of non-direct charged wage time are charged to various programs incorrectly. Cause: Limitation of current system being utilized to allocate payroll costs. Effect: Costs charged to the program may be considered unallowable if not allocated in a manner consistent with where the employee actually spends their time. Recommendation: The Consortium should adopt policies and procedures that require that allocations for labor to align with how the employee actually spends their time. Views of Responsible Officials: We agree with the finding. We have addressed the issues within the Consortium to properly allocate non-direct wage time.
Finding 2022-001: Significant Deficiency – Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Repeat Finding: 2021-001 Organization did not implement an established and accurate cost allocation plan during the fiscal year ending June 30, 2022. Therefore, not all costs were shared among different grants consistently and accurately. Criteria: Under the U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Title 2: Grants and Agreements, PART 200 - Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, Subpart E - Cost Principles Sec. 200.405 Allocable Costs - the cost must be allocated to the grants/projects based on the proportional benefit. If a cost benefits two or more grants/projects or activities in proportions that cannot be determined because of the interrelationship of the work involved, then the costs may be allocated or transferred to benefitted projects on a reasonable documented basis. Condition: During our prior year audit as well as during a monitoring visit by PDE, it was discovered that certain expenses were allocated to grants on an unsupported basis. Based on testing of expenditures performed for current year an accurate cost allocation plan was not accurately developed or implemented during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2022. Questioned Costs: None Cause: The Organization did not create or implement an accurate cost allocation plan during the current or prior or fiscal year. Effect: DCLC is not in compliance with 2 CFR Sec. 200.405 - Allocable Costs. Recommendation: We recommend that DCLC work to develop and implement a written allocation plan including calculations for all direct and indirect costs that benefit two or more grants or programs. Specifically, DCLC should review actual expenses on an ongoing basis and make any necessary adjustments to the allocated expenses.
Finding 2022-003Material weakness in internal controls over compliance for allowable activities and costs and material non-compliance inthe Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund program.Federal Agencies: Department of Justice; Department of the TreasuryProgram Titles: Crime Victim Assistance; Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery FundAssistance Listing Numbers: 16.575; 21.027Award Numbers: 22-31219-018, 22-31310-140, 22-31219-019, F19-31219-553, 8152, DA-239Award Periods: VariousCriteriaCharges to federal awards must meet the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, UniformAdministrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards Subpart E - Cost Principles.Condition/Context for EvaluationDuring our audit we identified that a total of 19 of 142 transactions (79 non-payroll transactions and 63 for payrolltransactions) tested for allowable costs and activities did not meet the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of FederalRegulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal AwardsSubpart E - Cost Principles. Below is a disaggregation of the exceptions identified:- Thirteen of the non-payroll transactions tested did not have documentation available to support the allocationof the expense to the program in accordance with 2 CFR 200.405.- Three of the non-payroll transactions tested did not meet the reasonable and necessary criteria of 2 CFR200.403.- Two of the payroll transactions tested was charged to the federal award based upon allocations determinedbefore services were performed with no process to identify significant changes in the corresponding workactivity in accordance with 2 CFR 200.430(i).- Two of the transactions tested did not have adequate documentation to support the item of cost in accordancewith the criteria at 200.403(g).- One of the transactions tested the cost incurred represented a reimbursement for costs in excess of theallowable amount per the Organization?s policies and procedures and did not meet the criteria of 2 CFR 200.403.Our sample was not a statistical sample.Effect or Potential EffectThe Organization charged costs to the federal awards that were unallowable. Questioned CostsActual questioned costs identified during the audit totaled the amounts below by award:Assistance Pass-Through KnownListing Pass-Through Award QuestionedNumber Funder Number Costs21.027 State of Oregon Department of Administrative Services 8152 $ 1921027 King County Regional Homelessness Authority DA-239 $ 3,808CauseInternal controls were not operating effectively to ensure only allowable costs were charged to the federal awards.Repeat FindingNot applicable.RecommendationWe recommend that the Organization provide additional training to employees to ensure that controls operate effectivelyso that only allowable costs are authorized to be charged to federal awards and that record retention controls arestrengthened to ensure documentation and policies are retained to support the distribution of charges between projects.Views of Responsible Officials of AuditeeManagement agrees with the finding and has provided the accompanying corrective action plan.
Finding 2022-003Material weakness in internal controls over compliance for allowable activities and costs and material non-compliance inthe Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund program.Federal Agencies: Department of Justice; Department of the TreasuryProgram Titles: Crime Victim Assistance; Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery FundAssistance Listing Numbers: 16.575; 21.027Award Numbers: 22-31219-018, 22-31310-140, 22-31219-019, F19-31219-553, 8152, DA-239Award Periods: VariousCriteriaCharges to federal awards must meet the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, UniformAdministrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards Subpart E - Cost Principles.Condition/Context for EvaluationDuring our audit we identified that a total of 19 of 142 transactions (79 non-payroll transactions and 63 for payrolltransactions) tested for allowable costs and activities did not meet the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of FederalRegulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal AwardsSubpart E - Cost Principles. Below is a disaggregation of the exceptions identified:- Thirteen of the non-payroll transactions tested did not have documentation available to support the allocationof the expense to the program in accordance with 2 CFR 200.405.- Three of the non-payroll transactions tested did not meet the reasonable and necessary criteria of 2 CFR200.403.- Two of the payroll transactions tested was charged to the federal award based upon allocations determinedbefore services were performed with no process to identify significant changes in the corresponding workactivity in accordance with 2 CFR 200.430(i).- Two of the transactions tested did not have adequate documentation to support the item of cost in accordancewith the criteria at 200.403(g).- One of the transactions tested the cost incurred represented a reimbursement for costs in excess of theallowable amount per the Organization?s policies and procedures and did not meet the criteria of 2 CFR 200.403.Our sample was not a statistical sample.Effect or Potential EffectThe Organization charged costs to the federal awards that were unallowable. Questioned CostsActual questioned costs identified during the audit totaled the amounts below by award:Assistance Pass-Through KnownListing Pass-Through Award QuestionedNumber Funder Number Costs21.027 State of Oregon Department of Administrative Services 8152 $ 1921027 King County Regional Homelessness Authority DA-239 $ 3,808CauseInternal controls were not operating effectively to ensure only allowable costs were charged to the federal awards.Repeat FindingNot applicable.RecommendationWe recommend that the Organization provide additional training to employees to ensure that controls operate effectivelyso that only allowable costs are authorized to be charged to federal awards and that record retention controls arestrengthened to ensure documentation and policies are retained to support the distribution of charges between projects.Views of Responsible Officials of AuditeeManagement agrees with the finding and has provided the accompanying corrective action plan.
Finding 2022-003Material weakness in internal controls over compliance for allowable activities and costs and material non-compliance inthe Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund program.Federal Agencies: Department of Justice; Department of the TreasuryProgram Titles: Crime Victim Assistance; Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery FundAssistance Listing Numbers: 16.575; 21.027Award Numbers: 22-31219-018, 22-31310-140, 22-31219-019, F19-31219-553, 8152, DA-239Award Periods: VariousCriteriaCharges to federal awards must meet the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, UniformAdministrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards Subpart E - Cost Principles.Condition/Context for EvaluationDuring our audit we identified that a total of 19 of 142 transactions (79 non-payroll transactions and 63 for payrolltransactions) tested for allowable costs and activities did not meet the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of FederalRegulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal AwardsSubpart E - Cost Principles. Below is a disaggregation of the exceptions identified:- Thirteen of the non-payroll transactions tested did not have documentation available to support the allocationof the expense to the program in accordance with 2 CFR 200.405.- Three of the non-payroll transactions tested did not meet the reasonable and necessary criteria of 2 CFR200.403.- Two of the payroll transactions tested was charged to the federal award based upon allocations determinedbefore services were performed with no process to identify significant changes in the corresponding workactivity in accordance with 2 CFR 200.430(i).- Two of the transactions tested did not have adequate documentation to support the item of cost in accordancewith the criteria at 200.403(g).- One of the transactions tested the cost incurred represented a reimbursement for costs in excess of theallowable amount per the Organization?s policies and procedures and did not meet the criteria of 2 CFR 200.403.Our sample was not a statistical sample.Effect or Potential EffectThe Organization charged costs to the federal awards that were unallowable. Questioned CostsActual questioned costs identified during the audit totaled the amounts below by award:Assistance Pass-Through KnownListing Pass-Through Award QuestionedNumber Funder Number Costs21.027 State of Oregon Department of Administrative Services 8152 $ 1921027 King County Regional Homelessness Authority DA-239 $ 3,808CauseInternal controls were not operating effectively to ensure only allowable costs were charged to the federal awards.Repeat FindingNot applicable.RecommendationWe recommend that the Organization provide additional training to employees to ensure that controls operate effectivelyso that only allowable costs are authorized to be charged to federal awards and that record retention controls arestrengthened to ensure documentation and policies are retained to support the distribution of charges between projects.Views of Responsible Officials of AuditeeManagement agrees with the finding and has provided the accompanying corrective action plan.
Finding 2022-003Material weakness in internal controls over compliance for allowable activities and costs and material non-compliance inthe Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund program.Federal Agencies: Department of Justice; Department of the TreasuryProgram Titles: Crime Victim Assistance; Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery FundAssistance Listing Numbers: 16.575; 21.027Award Numbers: 22-31219-018, 22-31310-140, 22-31219-019, F19-31219-553, 8152, DA-239Award Periods: VariousCriteriaCharges to federal awards must meet the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, UniformAdministrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards Subpart E - Cost Principles.Condition/Context for EvaluationDuring our audit we identified that a total of 19 of 142 transactions (79 non-payroll transactions and 63 for payrolltransactions) tested for allowable costs and activities did not meet the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of FederalRegulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal AwardsSubpart E - Cost Principles. Below is a disaggregation of the exceptions identified:- Thirteen of the non-payroll transactions tested did not have documentation available to support the allocationof the expense to the program in accordance with 2 CFR 200.405.- Three of the non-payroll transactions tested did not meet the reasonable and necessary criteria of 2 CFR200.403.- Two of the payroll transactions tested was charged to the federal award based upon allocations determinedbefore services were performed with no process to identify significant changes in the corresponding workactivity in accordance with 2 CFR 200.430(i).- Two of the transactions tested did not have adequate documentation to support the item of cost in accordancewith the criteria at 200.403(g).- One of the transactions tested the cost incurred represented a reimbursement for costs in excess of theallowable amount per the Organization?s policies and procedures and did not meet the criteria of 2 CFR 200.403.Our sample was not a statistical sample.Effect or Potential EffectThe Organization charged costs to the federal awards that were unallowable. Questioned CostsActual questioned costs identified during the audit totaled the amounts below by award:Assistance Pass-Through KnownListing Pass-Through Award QuestionedNumber Funder Number Costs21.027 State of Oregon Department of Administrative Services 8152 $ 1921027 King County Regional Homelessness Authority DA-239 $ 3,808CauseInternal controls were not operating effectively to ensure only allowable costs were charged to the federal awards.Repeat FindingNot applicable.RecommendationWe recommend that the Organization provide additional training to employees to ensure that controls operate effectivelyso that only allowable costs are authorized to be charged to federal awards and that record retention controls arestrengthened to ensure documentation and policies are retained to support the distribution of charges between projects.Views of Responsible Officials of AuditeeManagement agrees with the finding and has provided the accompanying corrective action plan.
Finding 2022-003Material weakness in internal controls over compliance for allowable activities and costs and material non-compliance inthe Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund program.Federal Agencies: Department of Justice; Department of the TreasuryProgram Titles: Crime Victim Assistance; Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery FundAssistance Listing Numbers: 16.575; 21.027Award Numbers: 22-31219-018, 22-31310-140, 22-31219-019, F19-31219-553, 8152, DA-239Award Periods: VariousCriteriaCharges to federal awards must meet the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, UniformAdministrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards Subpart E - Cost Principles.Condition/Context for EvaluationDuring our audit we identified that a total of 19 of 142 transactions (79 non-payroll transactions and 63 for payrolltransactions) tested for allowable costs and activities did not meet the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of FederalRegulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal AwardsSubpart E - Cost Principles. Below is a disaggregation of the exceptions identified:- Thirteen of the non-payroll transactions tested did not have documentation available to support the allocationof the expense to the program in accordance with 2 CFR 200.405.- Three of the non-payroll transactions tested did not meet the reasonable and necessary criteria of 2 CFR200.403.- Two of the payroll transactions tested was charged to the federal award based upon allocations determinedbefore services were performed with no process to identify significant changes in the corresponding workactivity in accordance with 2 CFR 200.430(i).- Two of the transactions tested did not have adequate documentation to support the item of cost in accordancewith the criteria at 200.403(g).- One of the transactions tested the cost incurred represented a reimbursement for costs in excess of theallowable amount per the Organization?s policies and procedures and did not meet the criteria of 2 CFR 200.403.Our sample was not a statistical sample.Effect or Potential EffectThe Organization charged costs to the federal awards that were unallowable. Questioned CostsActual questioned costs identified during the audit totaled the amounts below by award:Assistance Pass-Through KnownListing Pass-Through Award QuestionedNumber Funder Number Costs21.027 State of Oregon Department of Administrative Services 8152 $ 1921027 King County Regional Homelessness Authority DA-239 $ 3,808CauseInternal controls were not operating effectively to ensure only allowable costs were charged to the federal awards.Repeat FindingNot applicable.RecommendationWe recommend that the Organization provide additional training to employees to ensure that controls operate effectivelyso that only allowable costs are authorized to be charged to federal awards and that record retention controls arestrengthened to ensure documentation and policies are retained to support the distribution of charges between projects.Views of Responsible Officials of AuditeeManagement agrees with the finding and has provided the accompanying corrective action plan.
Finding 2022-003Material weakness in internal controls over compliance for allowable activities and costs and material non-compliance inthe Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund program.Federal Agencies: Department of Justice; Department of the TreasuryProgram Titles: Crime Victim Assistance; Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery FundAssistance Listing Numbers: 16.575; 21.027Award Numbers: 22-31219-018, 22-31310-140, 22-31219-019, F19-31219-553, 8152, DA-239Award Periods: VariousCriteriaCharges to federal awards must meet the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, UniformAdministrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards Subpart E - Cost Principles.Condition/Context for EvaluationDuring our audit we identified that a total of 19 of 142 transactions (79 non-payroll transactions and 63 for payrolltransactions) tested for allowable costs and activities did not meet the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of FederalRegulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal AwardsSubpart E - Cost Principles. Below is a disaggregation of the exceptions identified:- Thirteen of the non-payroll transactions tested did not have documentation available to support the allocationof the expense to the program in accordance with 2 CFR 200.405.- Three of the non-payroll transactions tested did not meet the reasonable and necessary criteria of 2 CFR200.403.- Two of the payroll transactions tested was charged to the federal award based upon allocations determinedbefore services were performed with no process to identify significant changes in the corresponding workactivity in accordance with 2 CFR 200.430(i).- Two of the transactions tested did not have adequate documentation to support the item of cost in accordancewith the criteria at 200.403(g).- One of the transactions tested the cost incurred represented a reimbursement for costs in excess of theallowable amount per the Organization?s policies and procedures and did not meet the criteria of 2 CFR 200.403.Our sample was not a statistical sample.Effect or Potential EffectThe Organization charged costs to the federal awards that were unallowable. Questioned CostsActual questioned costs identified during the audit totaled the amounts below by award:Assistance Pass-Through KnownListing Pass-Through Award QuestionedNumber Funder Number Costs21.027 State of Oregon Department of Administrative Services 8152 $ 1921027 King County Regional Homelessness Authority DA-239 $ 3,808CauseInternal controls were not operating effectively to ensure only allowable costs were charged to the federal awards.Repeat FindingNot applicable.RecommendationWe recommend that the Organization provide additional training to employees to ensure that controls operate effectivelyso that only allowable costs are authorized to be charged to federal awards and that record retention controls arestrengthened to ensure documentation and policies are retained to support the distribution of charges between projects.Views of Responsible Officials of AuditeeManagement agrees with the finding and has provided the accompanying corrective action plan.
Activities Allowed or Unallowed/Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Head Start ALN# 93.600 US Department of Health & Human Services Federal Grant/Contract Number: 10CH011215-02; 10CH011215-03; 10HE000901-01 Grant period – 2021 & 2022 Criteria – Per 2 CFR 200.303, the non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should follow guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Per 2 CFR section 200.403 – Factors affecting allowability of costs – Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: paragraph (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles; paragraph (g) Be adequately documented. Per 2 CFR section 200.404 – Reasonable costs – A cost is reasonable if, in its nature and amount, it does not exceed that which would be incurred by a prudent person under the circumstances prevailing at the time the decision was made to incur the cost. Per 2 CFR section 200.405 – Allocable costs –focuses on how costs are allocable, ensuring they are directly tied to the federal award or its benefits. Per 2 CFR 200.430(i), charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that are supported by a system of internal control that provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated and that are incorporated into the official records of the non-Federal entity. Condition – The following exceptions were noted during testing of 138 program disbursements, 93 payroll disbursements, and 100 journal entry transactions: • 20 invoices could not be located related to program disbursements • 6 invoices tested did not agree to the approved allocation of Head Start expenses • 1 timecard could not be located • multiple instances where an approved pay rate covering the appropriate time-period could not be obtained • 12 instances where supporting documentation for journal entries to adjust Head Start expenses could not be obtained. Cause – Turnover in staff and the passage of time since the period under audit has caused documentation to be misplaced. Effect – Inadequate or inconsistent documentation of expenses may result in erroneous or fraudulent transactions occurring, loss of funding, or disallowed costs. Questioned Costs – $151,608. Recommendation – Documentation should be prepared, reviewed, and retained to support the expense. Management’s Response – Management has reviewed and accepted the finding. See “Corrective Action Plan”.
Activities Allowed or Unallowed/Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Head Start ALN# 93.600 US Department of Health & Human Services Federal Grant/Contract Number: 10CH011215-02; 10CH011215-03; 10HE000901-01 Grant period – 2021 & 2022 Criteria – Per 2 CFR 200.303, the non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should follow guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Per 2 CFR section 200.403 – Factors affecting allowability of costs – Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: paragraph (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles; paragraph (g) Be adequately documented. Per 2 CFR section 200.404 – Reasonable costs – A cost is reasonable if, in its nature and amount, it does not exceed that which would be incurred by a prudent person under the circumstances prevailing at the time the decision was made to incur the cost. Per 2 CFR section 200.405 – Allocable costs –focuses on how costs are allocable, ensuring they are directly tied to the federal award or its benefits. Per 2 CFR 200.430(i), charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that are supported by a system of internal control that provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated and that are incorporated into the official records of the non-Federal entity. Condition – The following exceptions were noted during testing of 138 program disbursements, 93 payroll disbursements, and 100 journal entry transactions: • 20 invoices could not be located related to program disbursements • 6 invoices tested did not agree to the approved allocation of Head Start expenses • 1 timecard could not be located • multiple instances where an approved pay rate covering the appropriate time-period could not be obtained • 12 instances where supporting documentation for journal entries to adjust Head Start expenses could not be obtained. Cause – Turnover in staff and the passage of time since the period under audit has caused documentation to be misplaced. Effect – Inadequate or inconsistent documentation of expenses may result in erroneous or fraudulent transactions occurring, loss of funding, or disallowed costs. Questioned Costs – $151,608. Recommendation – Documentation should be prepared, reviewed, and retained to support the expense. Management’s Response – Management has reviewed and accepted the finding. See “Corrective Action Plan”.
Activities Allowed or Unallowed/Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Head Start ALN# 93.600 US Department of Health & Human Services Federal Grant/Contract Number: 10CH011215-02; 10CH011215-03; 10HE000901-01 Grant period – 2021 & 2022 Criteria – Per 2 CFR 200.303, the non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should follow guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Per 2 CFR section 200.403 – Factors affecting allowability of costs – Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: paragraph (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles; paragraph (g) Be adequately documented. Per 2 CFR section 200.404 – Reasonable costs – A cost is reasonable if, in its nature and amount, it does not exceed that which would be incurred by a prudent person under the circumstances prevailing at the time the decision was made to incur the cost. Per 2 CFR section 200.405 – Allocable costs –focuses on how costs are allocable, ensuring they are directly tied to the federal award or its benefits. Per 2 CFR 200.430(i), charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that are supported by a system of internal control that provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated and that are incorporated into the official records of the non-Federal entity. Condition – The following exceptions were noted during testing of 138 program disbursements, 93 payroll disbursements, and 100 journal entry transactions: • 20 invoices could not be located related to program disbursements • 6 invoices tested did not agree to the approved allocation of Head Start expenses • 1 timecard could not be located • multiple instances where an approved pay rate covering the appropriate time-period could not be obtained • 12 instances where supporting documentation for journal entries to adjust Head Start expenses could not be obtained. Cause – Turnover in staff and the passage of time since the period under audit has caused documentation to be misplaced. Effect – Inadequate or inconsistent documentation of expenses may result in erroneous or fraudulent transactions occurring, loss of funding, or disallowed costs. Questioned Costs – $151,608. Recommendation – Documentation should be prepared, reviewed, and retained to support the expense. Management’s Response – Management has reviewed and accepted the finding. See “Corrective Action Plan”.
Activities Allowed or Unallowed/Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Head Start ALN# 93.600 US Department of Health & Human Services Federal Grant/Contract Number: 10CH011215-02; 10CH011215-03; 10HE000901-01 Grant period – 2021 & 2022 Criteria – Per 2 CFR 200.303, the non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should follow guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Per 2 CFR section 200.403 – Factors affecting allowability of costs – Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: paragraph (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles; paragraph (g) Be adequately documented. Per 2 CFR section 200.404 – Reasonable costs – A cost is reasonable if, in its nature and amount, it does not exceed that which would be incurred by a prudent person under the circumstances prevailing at the time the decision was made to incur the cost. Per 2 CFR section 200.405 – Allocable costs –focuses on how costs are allocable, ensuring they are directly tied to the federal award or its benefits. Per 2 CFR 200.430(i), charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that are supported by a system of internal control that provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated and that are incorporated into the official records of the non-Federal entity. Condition – The following exceptions were noted during testing of 138 program disbursements, 93 payroll disbursements, and 100 journal entry transactions: • 20 invoices could not be located related to program disbursements • 6 invoices tested did not agree to the approved allocation of Head Start expenses • 1 timecard could not be located • multiple instances where an approved pay rate covering the appropriate time-period could not be obtained • 12 instances where supporting documentation for journal entries to adjust Head Start expenses could not be obtained. Cause – Turnover in staff and the passage of time since the period under audit has caused documentation to be misplaced. Effect – Inadequate or inconsistent documentation of expenses may result in erroneous or fraudulent transactions occurring, loss of funding, or disallowed costs. Questioned Costs – $151,608. Recommendation – Documentation should be prepared, reviewed, and retained to support the expense. Management’s Response – Management has reviewed and accepted the finding. See “Corrective Action Plan”.
Activities Allowed or Unallowed/Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Head Start ALN# 93.600 US Department of Health & Human Services Federal Grant/Contract Number: 10CH011215-02; 10CH011215-03; 10HE000901-01 Grant period – 2021 & 2022 Criteria – Per 2 CFR 200.303, the non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should follow guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Per 2 CFR section 200.403 – Factors affecting allowability of costs – Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: paragraph (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles; paragraph (g) Be adequately documented. Per 2 CFR section 200.404 – Reasonable costs – A cost is reasonable if, in its nature and amount, it does not exceed that which would be incurred by a prudent person under the circumstances prevailing at the time the decision was made to incur the cost. Per 2 CFR section 200.405 – Allocable costs –focuses on how costs are allocable, ensuring they are directly tied to the federal award or its benefits. Per 2 CFR 200.430(i), charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that are supported by a system of internal control that provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated and that are incorporated into the official records of the non-Federal entity. Condition – The following exceptions were noted during testing of 138 program disbursements, 93 payroll disbursements, and 100 journal entry transactions: • 20 invoices could not be located related to program disbursements • 6 invoices tested did not agree to the approved allocation of Head Start expenses • 1 timecard could not be located • multiple instances where an approved pay rate covering the appropriate time-period could not be obtained • 12 instances where supporting documentation for journal entries to adjust Head Start expenses could not be obtained. Cause – Turnover in staff and the passage of time since the period under audit has caused documentation to be misplaced. Effect – Inadequate or inconsistent documentation of expenses may result in erroneous or fraudulent transactions occurring, loss of funding, or disallowed costs. Questioned Costs – $151,608. Recommendation – Documentation should be prepared, reviewed, and retained to support the expense. Management’s Response – Management has reviewed and accepted the finding. See “Corrective Action Plan”.
Activities Allowed or Unallowed/Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Head Start ALN# 93.600 US Department of Health & Human Services Federal Grant/Contract Number: 10CH011215-02; 10CH011215-03; 10HE000901-01 Grant period – 2021 & 2022 Criteria – Per 2 CFR 200.303, the non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should follow guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Per 2 CFR section 200.403 – Factors affecting allowability of costs – Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: paragraph (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles; paragraph (g) Be adequately documented. Per 2 CFR section 200.404 – Reasonable costs – A cost is reasonable if, in its nature and amount, it does not exceed that which would be incurred by a prudent person under the circumstances prevailing at the time the decision was made to incur the cost. Per 2 CFR section 200.405 – Allocable costs –focuses on how costs are allocable, ensuring they are directly tied to the federal award or its benefits. Per 2 CFR 200.430(i), charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that are supported by a system of internal control that provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated and that are incorporated into the official records of the non-Federal entity. Condition – The following exceptions were noted during testing of 138 program disbursements, 93 payroll disbursements, and 100 journal entry transactions: • 20 invoices could not be located related to program disbursements • 6 invoices tested did not agree to the approved allocation of Head Start expenses • 1 timecard could not be located • multiple instances where an approved pay rate covering the appropriate time-period could not be obtained • 12 instances where supporting documentation for journal entries to adjust Head Start expenses could not be obtained. Cause – Turnover in staff and the passage of time since the period under audit has caused documentation to be misplaced. Effect – Inadequate or inconsistent documentation of expenses may result in erroneous or fraudulent transactions occurring, loss of funding, or disallowed costs. Questioned Costs – $151,608. Recommendation – Documentation should be prepared, reviewed, and retained to support the expense. Management’s Response – Management has reviewed and accepted the finding. See “Corrective Action Plan”.
Condition: We selected a sample of payroll cost allocations and tested whether the employees’ time were allocated in accordance with Day One’s cost allocations by program. As a result of our test, we noted that one employee’s hours were did not match the allocation guidelines provided by the Organization and hours were improperly charged to the Substance Abuse Prevention and Control program. Criteria: § 200.405 Allocable costs. (a) A cost is allocable to a particular Federal award or other cost objective if the goods or services involved are chargeable or assignable to that Federal award or cost objective in accordance with relative benefits received. This standard is met if the cost: (1) Is incurred specifically for the Federal award; (2) Benefits both the Federal award and other work of the non-Federal entity and can be distributed in proportions that may be approximated using reasonable methods; and (3) Is necessary to the overall operation of the non-Federal entity and is assignable in part to the Federal award in accordance with the principles in this subpart.Cause: The Organization has not implemented policies and procedures requiring management review the accuracy of the costs allocations to each program prior to being recording in the accounting records. Questioned Costs: $1,282.83 Effect and Context: By improperly allocating payroll costs to the Substance Abuse Prevention and Control-CPS program, the amount of costs reported for this program are overstated at June 30, 2022. Recommendation: We also recommend management review allocation percentages and application of allocations prior to recording the costs in the accounting records. Management’s Response and Corrective Action Plan: See management’s responses documented on page 46-47.
Criteria: Title 2 of the Code of Federal Regulations (2 CFR), Part 200, Subpart E defines and discusses the federal cost principles that apply to federal awards administered by nonprofit organizations. The applicable sections of these cost principes are as follows: • 2 CFR 200.403 Factors affecting allowability of costs • 2 CFR 200.404 Reasonable costs • 2 CFR 200.405 Allocable costs • 2 CFR 200.413 Direct costs • 2 CFR 200.414 Indirect (F&A) costs Condition: The following were noted as related to compliance with allowable costs, cost allocation and federal cost principles: • Internal control on time spent by employees related to administrative functions or other indirect cost activities has not been properly designed or implemented. • All employee time, including employees and professional services contractors are being recorded directly to programs. Time spent on indirect activities is not being properly identified or properly allocated to programs. • A portion of time of the Operations Manager (Chief Executive of the Organization) is spent related to administrative time or other indirect cost activities. However, none of that time has been identified or charged as indirect costs. • The time card for the Operations Manager (Chief Executive of the Organization) is not reviewed or approved by a board member or other senior executive of the Organization. • The accounting services of AIRS is being provided by a third-party outsourced accountant. The costs related to these services were improperly recorded as direct personnel costs to the program rather than properly classified as indirect costs. • Payroll taxes, employee benefits and other allowable employee related expenses were allocated to the program in a manner that does not accurately reflect the relative benefits received. These costs were allocated to the program as a percentage of total payroll costs, however, the percentage used exceeds that actual percentage of these costs as a percentage of total payroll costs. • A reasonable, consistent and uniform cost allocation methodology has not been properly designed or implemented. Costs that benefit both federal programs, non-federal programs and indirect costs are not being allocated properly across and to federal programs, non-federal programs and indirect costs in a reasonable, consistent and uniform manner. • Certain direct costs charged to the program were not based on actual costs incurred and the amounts charged were not adequately supported. • Indirect costs were not properly identified and segregated from direct costs. • Allowable indirect costs were not charged to the federal program. Cause: AIRS accounting staff and senior management do not appear to have a full and complete understanding of Uniform Guidance or of the applicable federal cost principles. Management has not properly applied the applicable federal costs principles in 2 CFR, Part 200, Subpart E to the costs charged to the federal program. Effect: Payroll costs and allowable employee related expenses, certain direct costs, allocable direct costs and indirect costs were not properly charged to the federal program. In order to estimate the questioned costs, the auditor, with the assistance of management, developed a costs allocation methodology that charges costs to the federal program in a reasonable, consistent and uniform manner in compliance with the costs principles contained in 2 CFR, Part 200, Subpart E. The primarily characteristics of this methodology are as follows: • Based upon discussions with management, review of the job description, roles and responsibilities of the Operations Manager and using prior experience and comparison to similar nonprofit organizations; an estimate of the percentage of time spent by the Operations Manager related to administration and other indirect activities was developed. • The time for the outsourced accounting services provider was removed from direct personnel costs and charged to indirect costs. • After the above revisions were made, the auditor assisted management in reallocating payroll costs across all federal and nonfederal programs and to indirect costs in a reasonable, consistent and uniform manner. • Allowable payroll taxes, benefits and other employee related expense charges were estimated using the actual percentage of these expenses as a percentage of total allowable payroll costs. • Non-allocable direct costs were charged to the program at the actual amount of those costs incurred. • Allocable direct costs charges were estimated by allocating those costs to the federal program on the basis of allowable payroll costs charged to program as a percentage of total allowable payroll costs (percentage of payroll methodology). This methodology is in compliance with the requirements of 2 CFR 200.405 and appears to produce a result that reasonably estimates the proportional benefit of these costs to all federal and non-federal programs, and to indirect cost activities. • Indirect costs were estimated and charged to the program using the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate as defined in 2 CFR 200.414. Questioned Costs: Using the methodology described above, the auditor has estimated total federal expenditures allowable to the program of $247,119. However, AIRS has charged federal expenditures of $272,781 to the program. Therefore, the estimated questioned costs related to this program are $25,662. Repeat Finding from Prior Year: No Recommendation: Senior management and accounting personnel should create procedures to ensure that direct program costs are charged at the actual amounts incurred, develop a payroll cost allocation methodology, and an allocable direct cost allocation methodology that ensures that costs are reasonably, consistently and uniformly charged to and across all federal and non-federal programs and to indirect costs relative to the proportional benefit of those costs, and in compliance with the applicable federal cost principles in 2 CFR, Part 200, Subpart E. Management and the board should consider providing senior management, accounting personnel and applicable program personnel additional training and education related to the proper application of and compliance with the federal costs principles as defined in 2 CFR, Part 200, Subpart E. Management and the board may also want to consider engaging a third-party CPA or other accounting professional who has extensive prior skills, knowledge and experience related to Uniform Guidance and federal cost principles. Views of Responsible Officials: Management concurs with this audit finding.
Criteria: Title 2 of the Code of Federal Regulations (2 CFR), Part 200, Subpart E defines and discusses the federal cost principles that apply to federal awards administered by nonprofit organizations. The applicable sections of these cost principes are as follows: • 2 CFR 200.403 Factors affecting allowability of costs • 2 CFR 200.404 Reasonable costs • 2 CFR 200.405 Allocable costs • 2 CFR 200.413 Direct costs • 2 CFR 200.414 Indirect (F&A) costs Condition: The following were noted as related to compliance with allowable costs, cost allocation and federal cost principles: • Internal control on time spent by employees related to administrative functions or other indirect cost activities has not been properly designed or implemented. • All employee time, including employees and professional services contractors are being recorded directly to programs. Time spent on indirect activities is not being properly identified or properly allocated to programs. • A portion of time of the Operations Manager (Chief Executive of the Organization) is spent related to administrative time or other indirect cost activities. However, none of that time has been identified or charged as indirect costs. • The time card for the Operations Manager (Chief Executive of the Organization) is not reviewed or approved by a board member or other senior executive of the Organization. • The accounting services of AIRS is being provided by a third-party outsourced accountant. The costs related to these services were improperly recorded as direct personnel costs to the program rather than properly classified as indirect costs. • Payroll taxes, employee benefits and other allowable employee related expenses were allocated to the program in a manner that does not accurately reflect the relative benefits received. These costs were allocated to the program as a percentage of total payroll costs, however, the percentage used exceeds that actual percentage of these costs as a percentage of total payroll costs. • A reasonable, consistent and uniform cost allocation methodology has not been properly designed or implemented. Costs that benefit both federal programs, non-federal programs and indirect costs are not being allocated properly across and to federal programs, non-federal programs and indirect costs in a reasonable, consistent and uniform manner. • Certain direct costs charged to the program were not based on actual costs incurred and the amounts charged were not adequately supported. • Indirect costs were not properly identified and segregated from direct costs. • Allowable indirect costs were not charged to the federal program. Cause: AIRS accounting staff and senior management do not appear to have a full and complete understanding of Uniform Guidance or of the applicable federal cost principles. Management has not properly applied the applicable federal costs principles in 2 CFR, Part 200, Subpart E to the costs charged to the federal program. Effect: Payroll costs and allowable employee related expenses, certain direct costs, allocable direct costs and indirect costs were not properly charged to the federal program. In order to estimate the questioned costs, the auditor, with the assistance of management, developed a costs allocation methodology that charges costs to the federal program in a reasonable, consistent and uniform manner in compliance with the costs principles contained in 2 CFR, Part 200, Subpart E. The primarily characteristics of this methodology are as follows: • Based upon discussions with management, review of the job description, roles and responsibilities of the Operations Manager and using prior experience and comparison to similar nonprofit organizations; an estimate of the percentage of time spent by the Operations Manager related to administration and other indirect activities was developed. • The time for the outsourced accounting services provider was removed from direct personnel costs and charged to indirect costs. • After the above revisions were made, the auditor assisted management in reallocating payroll costs across all federal and nonfederal programs and to indirect costs in a reasonable, consistent and uniform manner. • Allowable payroll taxes, benefits and other employee related expense charges were estimated using the actual percentage of these expenses as a percentage of total allowable payroll costs. • Non-allocable direct costs were charged to the program at the actual amount of those costs incurred. • Allocable direct costs charges were estimated by allocating those costs to the federal program on the basis of allowable payroll costs charged to program as a percentage of total allowable payroll costs (percentage of payroll methodology). This methodology is in compliance with the requirements of 2 CFR 200.405 and appears to produce a result that reasonably estimates the proportional benefit of these costs to all federal and non-federal programs, and to indirect cost activities. • Indirect costs were estimated and charged to the program using the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate as defined in 2 CFR 200.414. Questioned Costs: Using the methodology described above, the auditor has estimated total federal expenditures allowable to the program of $247,119. However, AIRS has charged federal expenditures of $272,781 to the program. Therefore, the estimated questioned costs related to this program are $25,662. Repeat Finding from Prior Year: No Recommendation: Senior management and accounting personnel should create procedures to ensure that direct program costs are charged at the actual amounts incurred, develop a payroll cost allocation methodology, and an allocable direct cost allocation methodology that ensures that costs are reasonably, consistently and uniformly charged to and across all federal and non-federal programs and to indirect costs relative to the proportional benefit of those costs, and in compliance with the applicable federal cost principles in 2 CFR, Part 200, Subpart E. Management and the board should consider providing senior management, accounting personnel and applicable program personnel additional training and education related to the proper application of and compliance with the federal costs principles as defined in 2 CFR, Part 200, Subpart E. Management and the board may also want to consider engaging a third-party CPA or other accounting professional who has extensive prior skills, knowledge and experience related to Uniform Guidance and federal cost principles. Views of Responsible Officials: Management concurs with this audit finding.
Finding Number: 2021-002; Finding Type: Federal award finding and financial statement finding; Federal Assistance Listing No.: 1) 16.556 2) 93.591; Program Names: 1) State Domestic Violence and Sexual Assault Coalitions 2) Family Violence Prevention and Services/State Domestic Violence Coalition; Federal Agencies: 1) U.S. Department of Justice 2) U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; Pass-Through Entity: n/a; Grant Numbers: 1) 2019-MU-AX-0017, 2) 2001ORSDC3; Federal Award Year: 2021; Control Deficiency Type: Material weakness in internal controls over compliance and financial reporting Instance of Noncompliance: Yes; Compliance Requirement: Allowable costs; Questioned Costs: 1) ALN 16.556: none over $25,000 2) ALN 93.591: $53,351; Repeat Finding: No; Criteria: According to 2 CFR §200.405, costs of a federal award must be allowable and allocable. A cost is allocable to a particular federal award if the goods or services involved are chargeable to the federal award in accordance with relative benefits received. This standard is met if the cost was incurred specifically for the federal award; benefits both the federal award and other work of the non-federal entity and can be distributed in proportions that may be approximated using reasonable methods; and is necessary to the overall operation of the non-federal entity and is assignable in part to the federal award in accordance with cost principles in this section. An organization must use an equitable distribution base to allocate its indirect and administrative costs. The organization should have controls in place to ensure that indirect costs are charged uniformly to both federally funded activities and other activities of the organization, and the allocation methodology results in an equitable allocation of indirect and shared administrative costs. Condition: During the audit, it was noted that costs appearing administrative in nature were charged as direct costs to two federal awards, including $39,814 of the accounting manager’s salary and $26,797 in audit fees relating to the fiscal year 2020 audit, a year in which no Single Audit was require or performed. In accordance with CFR §200.425, costs of auditing a non-federal entity that is exempted from having an audit conducted under the Single Audit Act because its expenditures under federal awards are less than $750,000 during the non-federal entity’s fiscal year are considered unallowable costs. Cause: The organization did not have a proper understanding of the Uniform Guidance regulations governing the expenditure of federal funds. Effect: Costs that appeared to be administrative in nature and benefitted all programs were charged to two federal grants as direct expenses: $53,351 to ALN 93.591 and $13,260 to ALN 16.556. Audit Recommendation: We recommend the Coalition develop controls and procedures to correctly distinguish between direct and indirect costs, as well as, procedures to identify and exclude costs that the Uniform Guidance has indicated as unallowable costs. Management’s Response: OCADSV added an Administrative Cost Center to its General Ledger effective 10/01/22, the beginning of FY23 and began costing administrative payroll cost to that cost center. Additionally, the organization retrained administrative staff on direct cost allowable activities vs. administrative activities relative to timekeeping and timesheet preparation and the necessity of daily work descriptions supporting the hourly allocation. The Payroll policy that requires supervisors to review and sign off on timesheets and hourly allocations to cost centers was also reviewed. Audit costs for FY22 will be allocated in accordance with 2 CFR 200.405 requirements. Beginning with FY23 all accounting and other admin payroll related cost will be allocated to the administration cost center with the exception of time spent in activities related to a specific grant or other cost center. FY22 grant expenditures were reviewed post year-end and a line-by-line review was conducted to bring the di-rect and indirect expense cumulative total into compliance with audit findings. Any outstanding reports were adjusted to reflect the adjusted Life of Grant to current date reporting. Executive, Financial and Grant Management staff will, during FY24, complete the Online Grants Financial Management Training available at onlinegfmt.training.ojp.gov to improve knowledge and compliance with 2 CFR 200 guidance and requirements. The said training will be incorporated into onboarding processes for any newly hired employee who have direct responsibilities related to grant management and/or reporting
Finding Number: 2021-002; Finding Type: Federal award finding and financial statement finding; Federal Assistance Listing No.: 1) 16.556 2) 93.591; Program Names: 1) State Domestic Violence and Sexual Assault Coalitions 2) Family Violence Prevention and Services/State Domestic Violence Coalition; Federal Agencies: 1) U.S. Department of Justice 2) U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; Pass-Through Entity: n/a; Grant Numbers: 1) 2019-MU-AX-0017, 2) 2001ORSDC3; Federal Award Year: 2021; Control Deficiency Type: Material weakness in internal controls over compliance and financial reporting Instance of Noncompliance: Yes; Compliance Requirement: Allowable costs; Questioned Costs: 1) ALN 16.556: none over $25,000 2) ALN 93.591: $53,351; Repeat Finding: No; Criteria: According to 2 CFR §200.405, costs of a federal award must be allowable and allocable. A cost is allocable to a particular federal award if the goods or services involved are chargeable to the federal award in accordance with relative benefits received. This standard is met if the cost was incurred specifically for the federal award; benefits both the federal award and other work of the non-federal entity and can be distributed in proportions that may be approximated using reasonable methods; and is necessary to the overall operation of the non-federal entity and is assignable in part to the federal award in accordance with cost principles in this section. An organization must use an equitable distribution base to allocate its indirect and administrative costs. The organization should have controls in place to ensure that indirect costs are charged uniformly to both federally funded activities and other activities of the organization, and the allocation methodology results in an equitable allocation of indirect and shared administrative costs. Condition: During the audit, it was noted that costs appearing administrative in nature were charged as direct costs to two federal awards, including $39,814 of the accounting manager’s salary and $26,797 in audit fees relating to the fiscal year 2020 audit, a year in which no Single Audit was require or performed. In accordance with CFR §200.425, costs of auditing a non-federal entity that is exempted from having an audit conducted under the Single Audit Act because its expenditures under federal awards are less than $750,000 during the non-federal entity’s fiscal year are considered unallowable costs. Cause: The organization did not have a proper understanding of the Uniform Guidance regulations governing the expenditure of federal funds. Effect: Costs that appeared to be administrative in nature and benefitted all programs were charged to two federal grants as direct expenses: $53,351 to ALN 93.591 and $13,260 to ALN 16.556. Audit Recommendation: We recommend the Coalition develop controls and procedures to correctly distinguish between direct and indirect costs, as well as, procedures to identify and exclude costs that the Uniform Guidance has indicated as unallowable costs. Management’s Response: OCADSV added an Administrative Cost Center to its General Ledger effective 10/01/22, the beginning of FY23 and began costing administrative payroll cost to that cost center. Additionally, the organization retrained administrative staff on direct cost allowable activities vs. administrative activities relative to timekeeping and timesheet preparation and the necessity of daily work descriptions supporting the hourly allocation. The Payroll policy that requires supervisors to review and sign off on timesheets and hourly allocations to cost centers was also reviewed. Audit costs for FY22 will be allocated in accordance with 2 CFR 200.405 requirements. Beginning with FY23 all accounting and other admin payroll related cost will be allocated to the administration cost center with the exception of time spent in activities related to a specific grant or other cost center. FY22 grant expenditures were reviewed post year-end and a line-by-line review was conducted to bring the di-rect and indirect expense cumulative total into compliance with audit findings. Any outstanding reports were adjusted to reflect the adjusted Life of Grant to current date reporting. Executive, Financial and Grant Management staff will, during FY24, complete the Online Grants Financial Management Training available at onlinegfmt.training.ojp.gov to improve knowledge and compliance with 2 CFR 200 guidance and requirements. The said training will be incorporated into onboarding processes for any newly hired employee who have direct responsibilities related to grant management and/or reporting
Finding Number: 2021-002; Finding Type: Federal award finding and financial statement finding; Federal Assistance Listing No.: 1) 16.556 2) 93.591; Program Names: 1) State Domestic Violence and Sexual Assault Coalitions 2) Family Violence Prevention and Services/State Domestic Violence Coalition; Federal Agencies: 1) U.S. Department of Justice 2) U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; Pass-Through Entity: n/a; Grant Numbers: 1) 2019-MU-AX-0017, 2) 2001ORSDC3; Federal Award Year: 2021; Control Deficiency Type: Material weakness in internal controls over compliance and financial reporting Instance of Noncompliance: Yes; Compliance Requirement: Allowable costs; Questioned Costs: 1) ALN 16.556: none over $25,000 2) ALN 93.591: $53,351; Repeat Finding: No; Criteria: According to 2 CFR §200.405, costs of a federal award must be allowable and allocable. A cost is allocable to a particular federal award if the goods or services involved are chargeable to the federal award in accordance with relative benefits received. This standard is met if the cost was incurred specifically for the federal award; benefits both the federal award and other work of the non-federal entity and can be distributed in proportions that may be approximated using reasonable methods; and is necessary to the overall operation of the non-federal entity and is assignable in part to the federal award in accordance with cost principles in this section. An organization must use an equitable distribution base to allocate its indirect and administrative costs. The organization should have controls in place to ensure that indirect costs are charged uniformly to both federally funded activities and other activities of the organization, and the allocation methodology results in an equitable allocation of indirect and shared administrative costs. Condition: During the audit, it was noted that costs appearing administrative in nature were charged as direct costs to two federal awards, including $39,814 of the accounting manager’s salary and $26,797 in audit fees relating to the fiscal year 2020 audit, a year in which no Single Audit was require or performed. In accordance with CFR §200.425, costs of auditing a non-federal entity that is exempted from having an audit conducted under the Single Audit Act because its expenditures under federal awards are less than $750,000 during the non-federal entity’s fiscal year are considered unallowable costs. Cause: The organization did not have a proper understanding of the Uniform Guidance regulations governing the expenditure of federal funds. Effect: Costs that appeared to be administrative in nature and benefitted all programs were charged to two federal grants as direct expenses: $53,351 to ALN 93.591 and $13,260 to ALN 16.556. Audit Recommendation: We recommend the Coalition develop controls and procedures to correctly distinguish between direct and indirect costs, as well as, procedures to identify and exclude costs that the Uniform Guidance has indicated as unallowable costs. Management’s Response: OCADSV added an Administrative Cost Center to its General Ledger effective 10/01/22, the beginning of FY23 and began costing administrative payroll cost to that cost center. Additionally, the organization retrained administrative staff on direct cost allowable activities vs. administrative activities relative to timekeeping and timesheet preparation and the necessity of daily work descriptions supporting the hourly allocation. The Payroll policy that requires supervisors to review and sign off on timesheets and hourly allocations to cost centers was also reviewed. Audit costs for FY22 will be allocated in accordance with 2 CFR 200.405 requirements. Beginning with FY23 all accounting and other admin payroll related cost will be allocated to the administration cost center with the exception of time spent in activities related to a specific grant or other cost center. FY22 grant expenditures were reviewed post year-end and a line-by-line review was conducted to bring the di-rect and indirect expense cumulative total into compliance with audit findings. Any outstanding reports were adjusted to reflect the adjusted Life of Grant to current date reporting. Executive, Financial and Grant Management staff will, during FY24, complete the Online Grants Financial Management Training available at onlinegfmt.training.ojp.gov to improve knowledge and compliance with 2 CFR 200 guidance and requirements. The said training will be incorporated into onboarding processes for any newly hired employee who have direct responsibilities related to grant management and/or reporting
Finding Number: 2021-002; Finding Type: Federal award finding and financial statement finding; Federal Assistance Listing No.: 1) 16.556 2) 93.591; Program Names: 1) State Domestic Violence and Sexual Assault Coalitions 2) Family Violence Prevention and Services/State Domestic Violence Coalition; Federal Agencies: 1) U.S. Department of Justice 2) U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; Pass-Through Entity: n/a; Grant Numbers: 1) 2019-MU-AX-0017, 2) 2001ORSDC3; Federal Award Year: 2021; Control Deficiency Type: Material weakness in internal controls over compliance and financial reporting Instance of Noncompliance: Yes; Compliance Requirement: Allowable costs; Questioned Costs: 1) ALN 16.556: none over $25,000 2) ALN 93.591: $53,351; Repeat Finding: No; Criteria: According to 2 CFR §200.405, costs of a federal award must be allowable and allocable. A cost is allocable to a particular federal award if the goods or services involved are chargeable to the federal award in accordance with relative benefits received. This standard is met if the cost was incurred specifically for the federal award; benefits both the federal award and other work of the non-federal entity and can be distributed in proportions that may be approximated using reasonable methods; and is necessary to the overall operation of the non-federal entity and is assignable in part to the federal award in accordance with cost principles in this section. An organization must use an equitable distribution base to allocate its indirect and administrative costs. The organization should have controls in place to ensure that indirect costs are charged uniformly to both federally funded activities and other activities of the organization, and the allocation methodology results in an equitable allocation of indirect and shared administrative costs. Condition: During the audit, it was noted that costs appearing administrative in nature were charged as direct costs to two federal awards, including $39,814 of the accounting manager’s salary and $26,797 in audit fees relating to the fiscal year 2020 audit, a year in which no Single Audit was require or performed. In accordance with CFR §200.425, costs of auditing a non-federal entity that is exempted from having an audit conducted under the Single Audit Act because its expenditures under federal awards are less than $750,000 during the non-federal entity’s fiscal year are considered unallowable costs. Cause: The organization did not have a proper understanding of the Uniform Guidance regulations governing the expenditure of federal funds. Effect: Costs that appeared to be administrative in nature and benefitted all programs were charged to two federal grants as direct expenses: $53,351 to ALN 93.591 and $13,260 to ALN 16.556. Audit Recommendation: We recommend the Coalition develop controls and procedures to correctly distinguish between direct and indirect costs, as well as, procedures to identify and exclude costs that the Uniform Guidance has indicated as unallowable costs. Management’s Response: OCADSV added an Administrative Cost Center to its General Ledger effective 10/01/22, the beginning of FY23 and began costing administrative payroll cost to that cost center. Additionally, the organization retrained administrative staff on direct cost allowable activities vs. administrative activities relative to timekeeping and timesheet preparation and the necessity of daily work descriptions supporting the hourly allocation. The Payroll policy that requires supervisors to review and sign off on timesheets and hourly allocations to cost centers was also reviewed. Audit costs for FY22 will be allocated in accordance with 2 CFR 200.405 requirements. Beginning with FY23 all accounting and other admin payroll related cost will be allocated to the administration cost center with the exception of time spent in activities related to a specific grant or other cost center. FY22 grant expenditures were reviewed post year-end and a line-by-line review was conducted to bring the di-rect and indirect expense cumulative total into compliance with audit findings. Any outstanding reports were adjusted to reflect the adjusted Life of Grant to current date reporting. Executive, Financial and Grant Management staff will, during FY24, complete the Online Grants Financial Management Training available at onlinegfmt.training.ojp.gov to improve knowledge and compliance with 2 CFR 200 guidance and requirements. The said training will be incorporated into onboarding processes for any newly hired employee who have direct responsibilities related to grant management and/or reporting
Finding Number: 2021-SA3 Material Weakness – Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles and Period of Performance Compliance and Control Finding Federal Award: No. 64.024 VA Homeless Providers Grant and Per Diem Program Federal Agency: U.S. Veterans Administration Pass-Through Entity: Not applicable Criteria or Specific Requirement: CFR section 200.403, Factors affecting allowability of costs, states costs must: conform to limitations or exclusions, be accorded consistent treatment, a cost may not be assigned to a Federal award as a direct cost if any other cost incurred for the same purpose in like circumstances has been allocated to the Federal award as an indirect cost and be adequately documented. 2 CFR section 200.405, Allowable costs, states this standard is met if the cost is incurred specifically for the Federal award. 2 CFR section 200.430(i) Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses state charges to Federal awards for salaries must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed and these records must be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated, support the distribution of the employee’s salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award a Federal award and non-Federal award and charges for the salaries and wages of nonexempt employees… must be supported by records indicating the total number of hours worked each day. Condition: The Organization did not maintain an effective control environment to ensure costs incurred for expenditures charged to the program were in accordance with contract requirements and applicable cost principles. Records do not provide reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Records do not appear to support the distribution of the employee’s salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award or a Federal award and non-federal activity. Charges for non-exempt employees are not supported by records indicating the total number of hours worked each day. Expenditure details included costs that were allocated to the Federal award but may not have been incurred specifically for the Federal award. These costs included unsupported journal entries and uncategorized expenditures. Additionally, due to lack of budgets for the fiscal year, it was not determinable if costs conformed to limitations or exclusions set forth in the Federal award. Costs were not adequately documented, and it is unknown if costs were accorded consistent treatment. Cause: Factors beyond the control of current management, including poor recordkeeping, have caused financial records to be inadequate for audit purposes, as key members of the accounting department left the Organization before appropriately transferring knowledge and records related to the Federal awards. Effect or Potential Effect: Potential for unallowable activities, unallowable costs, and costs outside of the period of performance and additional questioned costs. Questioned Costs: Related questioned costs related to payroll expenditures are unknown. Questioned costs related to non-payroll expenditures are unknown. Context: During the year under audit, the issues represent a systemic problem, beyond the control of current management. Recommendation: Policies and procedures should be designed and implemented to ensure expenditures are reviewed for allowability before being charged to federal awards. Policies and procedures should be designed and implemented to ensure costs are reviewed for allowability before being charged to federal awards. Management should perform budget to actual analysis on a periodic basis to ensure that costs are not exceeding limitations. View of Responsible Officials: In response to finding number 2021-SA3, management agrees with the finding and will design, implement, and maintain policies and procedures that ensure expenditures are reviewed for allowability before being charged to Federal awards. Management will also design, implement, and maintain policies and procedures that ensure costs are reviewed for allowability before being charged to Federal awards. Further, management will perform budget-to-actual analysis on a periodic basis to ensure costs do not exceed limitations.
Finding Number: 2021-SA3 Material Weakness – Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles and Period of Performance Compliance and Control Finding Federal Award: No. 64.024 VA Homeless Providers Grant and Per Diem Program Federal Agency: U.S. Veterans Administration Pass-Through Entity: Not applicable Criteria or Specific Requirement: CFR section 200.403, Factors affecting allowability of costs, states costs must: conform to limitations or exclusions, be accorded consistent treatment, a cost may not be assigned to a Federal award as a direct cost if any other cost incurred for the same purpose in like circumstances has been allocated to the Federal award as an indirect cost and be adequately documented. 2 CFR section 200.405, Allowable costs, states this standard is met if the cost is incurred specifically for the Federal award. 2 CFR section 200.430(i) Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses state charges to Federal awards for salaries must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed and these records must be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated, support the distribution of the employee’s salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award a Federal award and non-Federal award and charges for the salaries and wages of nonexempt employees… must be supported by records indicating the total number of hours worked each day. Condition: The Organization did not maintain an effective control environment to ensure costs incurred for expenditures charged to the program were in accordance with contract requirements and applicable cost principles. Records do not provide reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Records do not appear to support the distribution of the employee’s salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award or a Federal award and non-federal activity. Charges for non-exempt employees are not supported by records indicating the total number of hours worked each day. Expenditure details included costs that were allocated to the Federal award but may not have been incurred specifically for the Federal award. These costs included unsupported journal entries and uncategorized expenditures. Additionally, due to lack of budgets for the fiscal year, it was not determinable if costs conformed to limitations or exclusions set forth in the Federal award. Costs were not adequately documented, and it is unknown if costs were accorded consistent treatment. Cause: Factors beyond the control of current management, including poor recordkeeping, have caused financial records to be inadequate for audit purposes, as key members of the accounting department left the Organization before appropriately transferring knowledge and records related to the Federal awards. Effect or Potential Effect: Potential for unallowable activities, unallowable costs, and costs outside of the period of performance and additional questioned costs. Questioned Costs: Related questioned costs related to payroll expenditures are unknown. Questioned costs related to non-payroll expenditures are unknown. Context: During the year under audit, the issues represent a systemic problem, beyond the control of current management. Recommendation: Policies and procedures should be designed and implemented to ensure expenditures are reviewed for allowability before being charged to federal awards. Policies and procedures should be designed and implemented to ensure costs are reviewed for allowability before being charged to federal awards. Management should perform budget to actual analysis on a periodic basis to ensure that costs are not exceeding limitations. View of Responsible Officials: In response to finding number 2021-SA3, management agrees with the finding and will design, implement, and maintain policies and procedures that ensure expenditures are reviewed for allowability before being charged to Federal awards. Management will also design, implement, and maintain policies and procedures that ensure costs are reviewed for allowability before being charged to Federal awards. Further, management will perform budget-to-actual analysis on a periodic basis to ensure costs do not exceed limitations.
Finding Number: 2021-SA3 Material Weakness – Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles and Period of Performance Compliance and Control Finding Federal Award: No. 64.024 VA Homeless Providers Grant and Per Diem Program Federal Agency: U.S. Veterans Administration Pass-Through Entity: Not applicable Criteria or Specific Requirement: CFR section 200.403, Factors affecting allowability of costs, states costs must: conform to limitations or exclusions, be accorded consistent treatment, a cost may not be assigned to a Federal award as a direct cost if any other cost incurred for the same purpose in like circumstances has been allocated to the Federal award as an indirect cost and be adequately documented. 2 CFR section 200.405, Allowable costs, states this standard is met if the cost is incurred specifically for the Federal award. 2 CFR section 200.430(i) Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses state charges to Federal awards for salaries must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed and these records must be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated, support the distribution of the employee’s salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award a Federal award and non-Federal award and charges for the salaries and wages of nonexempt employees… must be supported by records indicating the total number of hours worked each day. Condition: The Organization did not maintain an effective control environment to ensure costs incurred for expenditures charged to the program were in accordance with contract requirements and applicable cost principles. Records do not provide reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Records do not appear to support the distribution of the employee’s salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award or a Federal award and non-federal activity. Charges for non-exempt employees are not supported by records indicating the total number of hours worked each day. Expenditure details included costs that were allocated to the Federal award but may not have been incurred specifically for the Federal award. These costs included unsupported journal entries and uncategorized expenditures. Additionally, due to lack of budgets for the fiscal year, it was not determinable if costs conformed to limitations or exclusions set forth in the Federal award. Costs were not adequately documented, and it is unknown if costs were accorded consistent treatment. Cause: Factors beyond the control of current management, including poor recordkeeping, have caused financial records to be inadequate for audit purposes, as key members of the accounting department left the Organization before appropriately transferring knowledge and records related to the Federal awards. Effect or Potential Effect: Potential for unallowable activities, unallowable costs, and costs outside of the period of performance and additional questioned costs. Questioned Costs: Related questioned costs related to payroll expenditures are unknown. Questioned costs related to non-payroll expenditures are unknown. Context: During the year under audit, the issues represent a systemic problem, beyond the control of current management. Recommendation: Policies and procedures should be designed and implemented to ensure expenditures are reviewed for allowability before being charged to federal awards. Policies and procedures should be designed and implemented to ensure costs are reviewed for allowability before being charged to federal awards. Management should perform budget to actual analysis on a periodic basis to ensure that costs are not exceeding limitations. View of Responsible Officials: In response to finding number 2021-SA3, management agrees with the finding and will design, implement, and maintain policies and procedures that ensure expenditures are reviewed for allowability before being charged to Federal awards. Management will also design, implement, and maintain policies and procedures that ensure costs are reviewed for allowability before being charged to Federal awards. Further, management will perform budget-to-actual analysis on a periodic basis to ensure costs do not exceed limitations.
Finding Number: 2021-SA3 Material Weakness – Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles and Period of Performance Compliance and Control Finding Federal Award: No. 64.024 VA Homeless Providers Grant and Per Diem Program Federal Agency: U.S. Veterans Administration Pass-Through Entity: Not applicable Criteria or Specific Requirement: CFR section 200.403, Factors affecting allowability of costs, states costs must: conform to limitations or exclusions, be accorded consistent treatment, a cost may not be assigned to a Federal award as a direct cost if any other cost incurred for the same purpose in like circumstances has been allocated to the Federal award as an indirect cost and be adequately documented. 2 CFR section 200.405, Allowable costs, states this standard is met if the cost is incurred specifically for the Federal award. 2 CFR section 200.430(i) Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses state charges to Federal awards for salaries must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed and these records must be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated, support the distribution of the employee’s salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award a Federal award and non-Federal award and charges for the salaries and wages of nonexempt employees… must be supported by records indicating the total number of hours worked each day. Condition: The Organization did not maintain an effective control environment to ensure costs incurred for expenditures charged to the program were in accordance with contract requirements and applicable cost principles. Records do not provide reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Records do not appear to support the distribution of the employee’s salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award or a Federal award and non-federal activity. Charges for non-exempt employees are not supported by records indicating the total number of hours worked each day. Expenditure details included costs that were allocated to the Federal award but may not have been incurred specifically for the Federal award. These costs included unsupported journal entries and uncategorized expenditures. Additionally, due to lack of budgets for the fiscal year, it was not determinable if costs conformed to limitations or exclusions set forth in the Federal award. Costs were not adequately documented, and it is unknown if costs were accorded consistent treatment. Cause: Factors beyond the control of current management, including poor recordkeeping, have caused financial records to be inadequate for audit purposes, as key members of the accounting department left the Organization before appropriately transferring knowledge and records related to the Federal awards. Effect or Potential Effect: Potential for unallowable activities, unallowable costs, and costs outside of the period of performance and additional questioned costs. Questioned Costs: Related questioned costs related to payroll expenditures are unknown. Questioned costs related to non-payroll expenditures are unknown. Context: During the year under audit, the issues represent a systemic problem, beyond the control of current management. Recommendation: Policies and procedures should be designed and implemented to ensure expenditures are reviewed for allowability before being charged to federal awards. Policies and procedures should be designed and implemented to ensure costs are reviewed for allowability before being charged to federal awards. Management should perform budget to actual analysis on a periodic basis to ensure that costs are not exceeding limitations. View of Responsible Officials: In response to finding number 2021-SA3, management agrees with the finding and will design, implement, and maintain policies and procedures that ensure expenditures are reviewed for allowability before being charged to Federal awards. Management will also design, implement, and maintain policies and procedures that ensure costs are reviewed for allowability before being charged to Federal awards. Further, management will perform budget-to-actual analysis on a periodic basis to ensure costs do not exceed limitations.
Finding Number: 2021-SA3 Material Weakness – Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles and Period of Performance Compliance and Control Finding Federal Award: No. 64.024 VA Homeless Providers Grant and Per Diem Program Federal Agency: U.S. Veterans Administration Pass-Through Entity: Not applicable Criteria or Specific Requirement: CFR section 200.403, Factors affecting allowability of costs, states costs must: conform to limitations or exclusions, be accorded consistent treatment, a cost may not be assigned to a Federal award as a direct cost if any other cost incurred for the same purpose in like circumstances has been allocated to the Federal award as an indirect cost and be adequately documented. 2 CFR section 200.405, Allowable costs, states this standard is met if the cost is incurred specifically for the Federal award. 2 CFR section 200.430(i) Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses state charges to Federal awards for salaries must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed and these records must be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated, support the distribution of the employee’s salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award a Federal award and non-Federal award and charges for the salaries and wages of nonexempt employees… must be supported by records indicating the total number of hours worked each day. Condition: The Organization did not maintain an effective control environment to ensure costs incurred for expenditures charged to the program were in accordance with contract requirements and applicable cost principles. Records do not provide reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Records do not appear to support the distribution of the employee’s salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award or a Federal award and non-federal activity. Charges for non-exempt employees are not supported by records indicating the total number of hours worked each day. Expenditure details included costs that were allocated to the Federal award but may not have been incurred specifically for the Federal award. These costs included unsupported journal entries and uncategorized expenditures. Additionally, due to lack of budgets for the fiscal year, it was not determinable if costs conformed to limitations or exclusions set forth in the Federal award. Costs were not adequately documented, and it is unknown if costs were accorded consistent treatment. Cause: Factors beyond the control of current management, including poor recordkeeping, have caused financial records to be inadequate for audit purposes, as key members of the accounting department left the Organization before appropriately transferring knowledge and records related to the Federal awards. Effect or Potential Effect: Potential for unallowable activities, unallowable costs, and costs outside of the period of performance and additional questioned costs. Questioned Costs: Related questioned costs related to payroll expenditures are unknown. Questioned costs related to non-payroll expenditures are unknown. Context: During the year under audit, the issues represent a systemic problem, beyond the control of current management. Recommendation: Policies and procedures should be designed and implemented to ensure expenditures are reviewed for allowability before being charged to federal awards. Policies and procedures should be designed and implemented to ensure costs are reviewed for allowability before being charged to federal awards. Management should perform budget to actual analysis on a periodic basis to ensure that costs are not exceeding limitations. View of Responsible Officials: In response to finding number 2021-SA3, management agrees with the finding and will design, implement, and maintain policies and procedures that ensure expenditures are reviewed for allowability before being charged to Federal awards. Management will also design, implement, and maintain policies and procedures that ensure costs are reviewed for allowability before being charged to Federal awards. Further, management will perform budget-to-actual analysis on a periodic basis to ensure costs do not exceed limitations.
Finding Number: 2021-SA3 Material Weakness – Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles and Period of Performance Compliance and Control Finding Federal Award: No. 64.024 VA Homeless Providers Grant and Per Diem Program Federal Agency: U.S. Veterans Administration Pass-Through Entity: Not applicable Criteria or Specific Requirement: CFR section 200.403, Factors affecting allowability of costs, states costs must: conform to limitations or exclusions, be accorded consistent treatment, a cost may not be assigned to a Federal award as a direct cost if any other cost incurred for the same purpose in like circumstances has been allocated to the Federal award as an indirect cost and be adequately documented. 2 CFR section 200.405, Allowable costs, states this standard is met if the cost is incurred specifically for the Federal award. 2 CFR section 200.430(i) Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses state charges to Federal awards for salaries must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed and these records must be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated, support the distribution of the employee’s salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award a Federal award and non-Federal award and charges for the salaries and wages of nonexempt employees… must be supported by records indicating the total number of hours worked each day. Condition: The Organization did not maintain an effective control environment to ensure costs incurred for expenditures charged to the program were in accordance with contract requirements and applicable cost principles. Records do not provide reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Records do not appear to support the distribution of the employee’s salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award or a Federal award and non-federal activity. Charges for non-exempt employees are not supported by records indicating the total number of hours worked each day. Expenditure details included costs that were allocated to the Federal award but may not have been incurred specifically for the Federal award. These costs included unsupported journal entries and uncategorized expenditures. Additionally, due to lack of budgets for the fiscal year, it was not determinable if costs conformed to limitations or exclusions set forth in the Federal award. Costs were not adequately documented, and it is unknown if costs were accorded consistent treatment. Cause: Factors beyond the control of current management, including poor recordkeeping, have caused financial records to be inadequate for audit purposes, as key members of the accounting department left the Organization before appropriately transferring knowledge and records related to the Federal awards. Effect or Potential Effect: Potential for unallowable activities, unallowable costs, and costs outside of the period of performance and additional questioned costs. Questioned Costs: Related questioned costs related to payroll expenditures are unknown. Questioned costs related to non-payroll expenditures are unknown. Context: During the year under audit, the issues represent a systemic problem, beyond the control of current management. Recommendation: Policies and procedures should be designed and implemented to ensure expenditures are reviewed for allowability before being charged to federal awards. Policies and procedures should be designed and implemented to ensure costs are reviewed for allowability before being charged to federal awards. Management should perform budget to actual analysis on a periodic basis to ensure that costs are not exceeding limitations. View of Responsible Officials: In response to finding number 2021-SA3, management agrees with the finding and will design, implement, and maintain policies and procedures that ensure expenditures are reviewed for allowability before being charged to Federal awards. Management will also design, implement, and maintain policies and procedures that ensure costs are reviewed for allowability before being charged to Federal awards. Further, management will perform budget-to-actual analysis on a periodic basis to ensure costs do not exceed limitations.
Finding Number: 2021-SA3 Material Weakness – Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles and Period of Performance Compliance and Control Finding Federal Award: No. 64.024 VA Homeless Providers Grant and Per Diem Program Federal Agency: U.S. Veterans Administration Pass-Through Entity: Not applicable Criteria or Specific Requirement: CFR section 200.403, Factors affecting allowability of costs, states costs must: conform to limitations or exclusions, be accorded consistent treatment, a cost may not be assigned to a Federal award as a direct cost if any other cost incurred for the same purpose in like circumstances has been allocated to the Federal award as an indirect cost and be adequately documented. 2 CFR section 200.405, Allowable costs, states this standard is met if the cost is incurred specifically for the Federal award. 2 CFR section 200.430(i) Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses state charges to Federal awards for salaries must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed and these records must be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated, support the distribution of the employee’s salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award a Federal award and non-Federal award and charges for the salaries and wages of nonexempt employees… must be supported by records indicating the total number of hours worked each day. Condition: The Organization did not maintain an effective control environment to ensure costs incurred for expenditures charged to the program were in accordance with contract requirements and applicable cost principles. Records do not provide reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Records do not appear to support the distribution of the employee’s salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award or a Federal award and non-federal activity. Charges for non-exempt employees are not supported by records indicating the total number of hours worked each day. Expenditure details included costs that were allocated to the Federal award but may not have been incurred specifically for the Federal award. These costs included unsupported journal entries and uncategorized expenditures. Additionally, due to lack of budgets for the fiscal year, it was not determinable if costs conformed to limitations or exclusions set forth in the Federal award. Costs were not adequately documented, and it is unknown if costs were accorded consistent treatment. Cause: Factors beyond the control of current management, including poor recordkeeping, have caused financial records to be inadequate for audit purposes, as key members of the accounting department left the Organization before appropriately transferring knowledge and records related to the Federal awards. Effect or Potential Effect: Potential for unallowable activities, unallowable costs, and costs outside of the period of performance and additional questioned costs. Questioned Costs: Related questioned costs related to payroll expenditures are unknown. Questioned costs related to non-payroll expenditures are unknown. Context: During the year under audit, the issues represent a systemic problem, beyond the control of current management. Recommendation: Policies and procedures should be designed and implemented to ensure expenditures are reviewed for allowability before being charged to federal awards. Policies and procedures should be designed and implemented to ensure costs are reviewed for allowability before being charged to federal awards. Management should perform budget to actual analysis on a periodic basis to ensure that costs are not exceeding limitations. View of Responsible Officials: In response to finding number 2021-SA3, management agrees with the finding and will design, implement, and maintain policies and procedures that ensure expenditures are reviewed for allowability before being charged to Federal awards. Management will also design, implement, and maintain policies and procedures that ensure costs are reviewed for allowability before being charged to Federal awards. Further, management will perform budget-to-actual analysis on a periodic basis to ensure costs do not exceed limitations.
Finding Number: 2021-SA3 Material Weakness – Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles and Period of Performance Compliance and Control Finding Federal Award: No. 64.024 VA Homeless Providers Grant and Per Diem Program Federal Agency: U.S. Veterans Administration Pass-Through Entity: Not applicable Criteria or Specific Requirement: CFR section 200.403, Factors affecting allowability of costs, states costs must: conform to limitations or exclusions, be accorded consistent treatment, a cost may not be assigned to a Federal award as a direct cost if any other cost incurred for the same purpose in like circumstances has been allocated to the Federal award as an indirect cost and be adequately documented. 2 CFR section 200.405, Allowable costs, states this standard is met if the cost is incurred specifically for the Federal award. 2 CFR section 200.430(i) Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses state charges to Federal awards for salaries must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed and these records must be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated, support the distribution of the employee’s salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award a Federal award and non-Federal award and charges for the salaries and wages of nonexempt employees… must be supported by records indicating the total number of hours worked each day. Condition: The Organization did not maintain an effective control environment to ensure costs incurred for expenditures charged to the program were in accordance with contract requirements and applicable cost principles. Records do not provide reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Records do not appear to support the distribution of the employee’s salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award or a Federal award and non-federal activity. Charges for non-exempt employees are not supported by records indicating the total number of hours worked each day. Expenditure details included costs that were allocated to the Federal award but may not have been incurred specifically for the Federal award. These costs included unsupported journal entries and uncategorized expenditures. Additionally, due to lack of budgets for the fiscal year, it was not determinable if costs conformed to limitations or exclusions set forth in the Federal award. Costs were not adequately documented, and it is unknown if costs were accorded consistent treatment. Cause: Factors beyond the control of current management, including poor recordkeeping, have caused financial records to be inadequate for audit purposes, as key members of the accounting department left the Organization before appropriately transferring knowledge and records related to the Federal awards. Effect or Potential Effect: Potential for unallowable activities, unallowable costs, and costs outside of the period of performance and additional questioned costs. Questioned Costs: Related questioned costs related to payroll expenditures are unknown. Questioned costs related to non-payroll expenditures are unknown. Context: During the year under audit, the issues represent a systemic problem, beyond the control of current management. Recommendation: Policies and procedures should be designed and implemented to ensure expenditures are reviewed for allowability before being charged to federal awards. Policies and procedures should be designed and implemented to ensure costs are reviewed for allowability before being charged to federal awards. Management should perform budget to actual analysis on a periodic basis to ensure that costs are not exceeding limitations. View of Responsible Officials: In response to finding number 2021-SA3, management agrees with the finding and will design, implement, and maintain policies and procedures that ensure expenditures are reviewed for allowability before being charged to Federal awards. Management will also design, implement, and maintain policies and procedures that ensure costs are reviewed for allowability before being charged to Federal awards. Further, management will perform budget-to-actual analysis on a periodic basis to ensure costs do not exceed limitations.
Finding Number: 2021-SA3 Material Weakness – Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles and Period of Performance Compliance and Control Finding Federal Award: No. 64.024 VA Homeless Providers Grant and Per Diem Program Federal Agency: U.S. Veterans Administration Pass-Through Entity: Not applicable Criteria or Specific Requirement: CFR section 200.403, Factors affecting allowability of costs, states costs must: conform to limitations or exclusions, be accorded consistent treatment, a cost may not be assigned to a Federal award as a direct cost if any other cost incurred for the same purpose in like circumstances has been allocated to the Federal award as an indirect cost and be adequately documented. 2 CFR section 200.405, Allowable costs, states this standard is met if the cost is incurred specifically for the Federal award. 2 CFR section 200.430(i) Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses state charges to Federal awards for salaries must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed and these records must be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated, support the distribution of the employee’s salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award a Federal award and non-Federal award and charges for the salaries and wages of nonexempt employees… must be supported by records indicating the total number of hours worked each day. Condition: The Organization did not maintain an effective control environment to ensure costs incurred for expenditures charged to the program were in accordance with contract requirements and applicable cost principles. Records do not provide reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Records do not appear to support the distribution of the employee’s salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award or a Federal award and non-federal activity. Charges for non-exempt employees are not supported by records indicating the total number of hours worked each day. Expenditure details included costs that were allocated to the Federal award but may not have been incurred specifically for the Federal award. These costs included unsupported journal entries and uncategorized expenditures. Additionally, due to lack of budgets for the fiscal year, it was not determinable if costs conformed to limitations or exclusions set forth in the Federal award. Costs were not adequately documented, and it is unknown if costs were accorded consistent treatment. Cause: Factors beyond the control of current management, including poor recordkeeping, have caused financial records to be inadequate for audit purposes, as key members of the accounting department left the Organization before appropriately transferring knowledge and records related to the Federal awards. Effect or Potential Effect: Potential for unallowable activities, unallowable costs, and costs outside of the period of performance and additional questioned costs. Questioned Costs: Related questioned costs related to payroll expenditures are unknown. Questioned costs related to non-payroll expenditures are unknown. Context: During the year under audit, the issues represent a systemic problem, beyond the control of current management. Recommendation: Policies and procedures should be designed and implemented to ensure expenditures are reviewed for allowability before being charged to federal awards. Policies and procedures should be designed and implemented to ensure costs are reviewed for allowability before being charged to federal awards. Management should perform budget to actual analysis on a periodic basis to ensure that costs are not exceeding limitations. View of Responsible Officials: In response to finding number 2021-SA3, management agrees with the finding and will design, implement, and maintain policies and procedures that ensure expenditures are reviewed for allowability before being charged to Federal awards. Management will also design, implement, and maintain policies and procedures that ensure costs are reviewed for allowability before being charged to Federal awards. Further, management will perform budget-to-actual analysis on a periodic basis to ensure costs do not exceed limitations.
Finding Number: 2021-SA3 Material Weakness – Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles and Period of Performance Compliance and Control Finding Federal Award: No. 64.024 VA Homeless Providers Grant and Per Diem Program Federal Agency: U.S. Veterans Administration Pass-Through Entity: Not applicable Criteria or Specific Requirement: CFR section 200.403, Factors affecting allowability of costs, states costs must: conform to limitations or exclusions, be accorded consistent treatment, a cost may not be assigned to a Federal award as a direct cost if any other cost incurred for the same purpose in like circumstances has been allocated to the Federal award as an indirect cost and be adequately documented. 2 CFR section 200.405, Allowable costs, states this standard is met if the cost is incurred specifically for the Federal award. 2 CFR section 200.430(i) Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses state charges to Federal awards for salaries must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed and these records must be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated, support the distribution of the employee’s salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award a Federal award and non-Federal award and charges for the salaries and wages of nonexempt employees… must be supported by records indicating the total number of hours worked each day. Condition: The Organization did not maintain an effective control environment to ensure costs incurred for expenditures charged to the program were in accordance with contract requirements and applicable cost principles. Records do not provide reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Records do not appear to support the distribution of the employee’s salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award or a Federal award and non-federal activity. Charges for non-exempt employees are not supported by records indicating the total number of hours worked each day. Expenditure details included costs that were allocated to the Federal award but may not have been incurred specifically for the Federal award. These costs included unsupported journal entries and uncategorized expenditures. Additionally, due to lack of budgets for the fiscal year, it was not determinable if costs conformed to limitations or exclusions set forth in the Federal award. Costs were not adequately documented, and it is unknown if costs were accorded consistent treatment. Cause: Factors beyond the control of current management, including poor recordkeeping, have caused financial records to be inadequate for audit purposes, as key members of the accounting department left the Organization before appropriately transferring knowledge and records related to the Federal awards. Effect or Potential Effect: Potential for unallowable activities, unallowable costs, and costs outside of the period of performance and additional questioned costs. Questioned Costs: Related questioned costs related to payroll expenditures are unknown. Questioned costs related to non-payroll expenditures are unknown. Context: During the year under audit, the issues represent a systemic problem, beyond the control of current management. Recommendation: Policies and procedures should be designed and implemented to ensure expenditures are reviewed for allowability before being charged to federal awards. Policies and procedures should be designed and implemented to ensure costs are reviewed for allowability before being charged to federal awards. Management should perform budget to actual analysis on a periodic basis to ensure that costs are not exceeding limitations. View of Responsible Officials: In response to finding number 2021-SA3, management agrees with the finding and will design, implement, and maintain policies and procedures that ensure expenditures are reviewed for allowability before being charged to Federal awards. Management will also design, implement, and maintain policies and procedures that ensure costs are reviewed for allowability before being charged to Federal awards. Further, management will perform budget-to-actual analysis on a periodic basis to ensure costs do not exceed limitations.
Finding Number: 2021-SA3 Material Weakness – Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles and Period of Performance Compliance and Control Finding Federal Award: No. 64.024 VA Homeless Providers Grant and Per Diem Program Federal Agency: U.S. Veterans Administration Pass-Through Entity: Not applicable Criteria or Specific Requirement: CFR section 200.403, Factors affecting allowability of costs, states costs must: conform to limitations or exclusions, be accorded consistent treatment, a cost may not be assigned to a Federal award as a direct cost if any other cost incurred for the same purpose in like circumstances has been allocated to the Federal award as an indirect cost and be adequately documented. 2 CFR section 200.405, Allowable costs, states this standard is met if the cost is incurred specifically for the Federal award. 2 CFR section 200.430(i) Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses state charges to Federal awards for salaries must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed and these records must be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated, support the distribution of the employee’s salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award a Federal award and non-Federal award and charges for the salaries and wages of nonexempt employees… must be supported by records indicating the total number of hours worked each day. Condition: The Organization did not maintain an effective control environment to ensure costs incurred for expenditures charged to the program were in accordance with contract requirements and applicable cost principles. Records do not provide reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Records do not appear to support the distribution of the employee’s salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award or a Federal award and non-federal activity. Charges for non-exempt employees are not supported by records indicating the total number of hours worked each day. Expenditure details included costs that were allocated to the Federal award but may not have been incurred specifically for the Federal award. These costs included unsupported journal entries and uncategorized expenditures. Additionally, due to lack of budgets for the fiscal year, it was not determinable if costs conformed to limitations or exclusions set forth in the Federal award. Costs were not adequately documented, and it is unknown if costs were accorded consistent treatment. Cause: Factors beyond the control of current management, including poor recordkeeping, have caused financial records to be inadequate for audit purposes, as key members of the accounting department left the Organization before appropriately transferring knowledge and records related to the Federal awards. Effect or Potential Effect: Potential for unallowable activities, unallowable costs, and costs outside of the period of performance and additional questioned costs. Questioned Costs: Related questioned costs related to payroll expenditures are unknown. Questioned costs related to non-payroll expenditures are unknown. Context: During the year under audit, the issues represent a systemic problem, beyond the control of current management. Recommendation: Policies and procedures should be designed and implemented to ensure expenditures are reviewed for allowability before being charged to federal awards. Policies and procedures should be designed and implemented to ensure costs are reviewed for allowability before being charged to federal awards. Management should perform budget to actual analysis on a periodic basis to ensure that costs are not exceeding limitations. View of Responsible Officials: In response to finding number 2021-SA3, management agrees with the finding and will design, implement, and maintain policies and procedures that ensure expenditures are reviewed for allowability before being charged to Federal awards. Management will also design, implement, and maintain policies and procedures that ensure costs are reviewed for allowability before being charged to Federal awards. Further, management will perform budget-to-actual analysis on a periodic basis to ensure costs do not exceed limitations.
Finding Number: 2021-SA3 Material Weakness – Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles and Period of Performance Compliance and Control Finding Federal Award: No. 64.024 VA Homeless Providers Grant and Per Diem Program Federal Agency: U.S. Veterans Administration Pass-Through Entity: Not applicable Criteria or Specific Requirement: CFR section 200.403, Factors affecting allowability of costs, states costs must: conform to limitations or exclusions, be accorded consistent treatment, a cost may not be assigned to a Federal award as a direct cost if any other cost incurred for the same purpose in like circumstances has been allocated to the Federal award as an indirect cost and be adequately documented. 2 CFR section 200.405, Allowable costs, states this standard is met if the cost is incurred specifically for the Federal award. 2 CFR section 200.430(i) Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses state charges to Federal awards for salaries must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed and these records must be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated, support the distribution of the employee’s salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award a Federal award and non-Federal award and charges for the salaries and wages of nonexempt employees… must be supported by records indicating the total number of hours worked each day. Condition: The Organization did not maintain an effective control environment to ensure costs incurred for expenditures charged to the program were in accordance with contract requirements and applicable cost principles. Records do not provide reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Records do not appear to support the distribution of the employee’s salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award or a Federal award and non-federal activity. Charges for non-exempt employees are not supported by records indicating the total number of hours worked each day. Expenditure details included costs that were allocated to the Federal award but may not have been incurred specifically for the Federal award. These costs included unsupported journal entries and uncategorized expenditures. Additionally, due to lack of budgets for the fiscal year, it was not determinable if costs conformed to limitations or exclusions set forth in the Federal award. Costs were not adequately documented, and it is unknown if costs were accorded consistent treatment. Cause: Factors beyond the control of current management, including poor recordkeeping, have caused financial records to be inadequate for audit purposes, as key members of the accounting department left the Organization before appropriately transferring knowledge and records related to the Federal awards. Effect or Potential Effect: Potential for unallowable activities, unallowable costs, and costs outside of the period of performance and additional questioned costs. Questioned Costs: Related questioned costs related to payroll expenditures are unknown. Questioned costs related to non-payroll expenditures are unknown. Context: During the year under audit, the issues represent a systemic problem, beyond the control of current management. Recommendation: Policies and procedures should be designed and implemented to ensure expenditures are reviewed for allowability before being charged to federal awards. Policies and procedures should be designed and implemented to ensure costs are reviewed for allowability before being charged to federal awards. Management should perform budget to actual analysis on a periodic basis to ensure that costs are not exceeding limitations. View of Responsible Officials: In response to finding number 2021-SA3, management agrees with the finding and will design, implement, and maintain policies and procedures that ensure expenditures are reviewed for allowability before being charged to Federal awards. Management will also design, implement, and maintain policies and procedures that ensure costs are reviewed for allowability before being charged to Federal awards. Further, management will perform budget-to-actual analysis on a periodic basis to ensure costs do not exceed limitations.
2020-108 Lack of Controls over Costs Submitted for Reimbursement (initially reported 2020) Assistance Listing Number: 93.224 Name of Federal Agency: Department of Health and Human Services, HRSA Program Title: Health Center Program (Community Health Centers, Migrant Health Centers, Health Care for the Homeless, and Public Housing Primary Care) Compliance Requirement: Activities Allowed, Allowable Costs and Period of Performance Pass-through Entity: N/A Federal Grant/Contract Number and Grant Year: 6H80CS06452-15 (2020), COVID-19 1H8CCS35035-01 (2020), COVID-19 1H8DCS36007-01 (2020) and COVID-19 1H8ECS39010-01 (2020) Finding Type: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Known Questioned Costs: $0 Condition: The Organization included an invoice for reimbursement under the program for which a vendor credit memo for the full amount of the invoice had been received due to miscoding of the credit memo to the correct COVID-19 class on the general ledger. In addition, the Organization did not include an applicable invoice for COVID-19 expenses for reimbursement due to the same miscoding of the COVID-19 class to the general ledger. Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.303 requires that nonfederal entities receiving federal awards establish and maintain internal control over the federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal awards. Under compliance requirements for allowable costs 2 CFR section 200.405(a)(1) costs should be incurred specifically for the federal award, and 2 CFR section 200.406(a) to the extent credits accruing or received by the nonfederal entity relate to allowable costs, they must be credited to the federal award program either as a cost reduction or cash refund as appropriate. Cause: The Organization did not apply the credit memo or the invoice to the correct general ledger classification resulting in the credit memo and invoice being incorrectly included or not included in the reimbursement request. Effect: The Organization is not applying for reimbursement with the correct supporting documentation which could lead to a loss of grant funding. Recommendation: The Organization should review the posting of any credit memos or applicable invoices to ensure they are posted to the correct account/classification so that only allowable costs which were incurred during the period of performance are included on any reimbursement requests. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The Organization has hired a new Chief Financial Officer as well as additional supporting staff within the finance department. Management understands the importance of reviewing the posting of credit memos or applicable invoices to ensure they are posted correctly. We will update our policy to include a process for review of credit memos prior to posting. The planned corrective action for this finding is currently in the process of development, approval, and implementation.
2020-108 Lack of Controls over Costs Submitted for Reimbursement (initially reported 2020) Assistance Listing Number: 93.224 Name of Federal Agency: Department of Health and Human Services, HRSA Program Title: Health Center Program (Community Health Centers, Migrant Health Centers, Health Care for the Homeless, and Public Housing Primary Care) Compliance Requirement: Activities Allowed, Allowable Costs and Period of Performance Pass-through Entity: N/A Federal Grant/Contract Number and Grant Year: 6H80CS06452-15 (2020), COVID-19 1H8CCS35035-01 (2020), COVID-19 1H8DCS36007-01 (2020) and COVID-19 1H8ECS39010-01 (2020) Finding Type: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Known Questioned Costs: $0 Condition: The Organization included an invoice for reimbursement under the program for which a vendor credit memo for the full amount of the invoice had been received due to miscoding of the credit memo to the correct COVID-19 class on the general ledger. In addition, the Organization did not include an applicable invoice for COVID-19 expenses for reimbursement due to the same miscoding of the COVID-19 class to the general ledger. Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.303 requires that nonfederal entities receiving federal awards establish and maintain internal control over the federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal awards. Under compliance requirements for allowable costs 2 CFR section 200.405(a)(1) costs should be incurred specifically for the federal award, and 2 CFR section 200.406(a) to the extent credits accruing or received by the nonfederal entity relate to allowable costs, they must be credited to the federal award program either as a cost reduction or cash refund as appropriate. Cause: The Organization did not apply the credit memo or the invoice to the correct general ledger classification resulting in the credit memo and invoice being incorrectly included or not included in the reimbursement request. Effect: The Organization is not applying for reimbursement with the correct supporting documentation which could lead to a loss of grant funding. Recommendation: The Organization should review the posting of any credit memos or applicable invoices to ensure they are posted to the correct account/classification so that only allowable costs which were incurred during the period of performance are included on any reimbursement requests. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The Organization has hired a new Chief Financial Officer as well as additional supporting staff within the finance department. Management understands the importance of reviewing the posting of credit memos or applicable invoices to ensure they are posted correctly. We will update our policy to include a process for review of credit memos prior to posting. The planned corrective action for this finding is currently in the process of development, approval, and implementation.
2020-108 Lack of Controls over Costs Submitted for Reimbursement (initially reported 2020) Assistance Listing Number: 93.224 Name of Federal Agency: Department of Health and Human Services, HRSA Program Title: Health Center Program (Community Health Centers, Migrant Health Centers, Health Care for the Homeless, and Public Housing Primary Care) Compliance Requirement: Activities Allowed, Allowable Costs and Period of Performance Pass-through Entity: N/A Federal Grant/Contract Number and Grant Year: 6H80CS06452-15 (2020), COVID-19 1H8CCS35035-01 (2020), COVID-19 1H8DCS36007-01 (2020) and COVID-19 1H8ECS39010-01 (2020) Finding Type: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Known Questioned Costs: $0 Condition: The Organization included an invoice for reimbursement under the program for which a vendor credit memo for the full amount of the invoice had been received due to miscoding of the credit memo to the correct COVID-19 class on the general ledger. In addition, the Organization did not include an applicable invoice for COVID-19 expenses for reimbursement due to the same miscoding of the COVID-19 class to the general ledger. Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.303 requires that nonfederal entities receiving federal awards establish and maintain internal control over the federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal awards. Under compliance requirements for allowable costs 2 CFR section 200.405(a)(1) costs should be incurred specifically for the federal award, and 2 CFR section 200.406(a) to the extent credits accruing or received by the nonfederal entity relate to allowable costs, they must be credited to the federal award program either as a cost reduction or cash refund as appropriate. Cause: The Organization did not apply the credit memo or the invoice to the correct general ledger classification resulting in the credit memo and invoice being incorrectly included or not included in the reimbursement request. Effect: The Organization is not applying for reimbursement with the correct supporting documentation which could lead to a loss of grant funding. Recommendation: The Organization should review the posting of any credit memos or applicable invoices to ensure they are posted to the correct account/classification so that only allowable costs which were incurred during the period of performance are included on any reimbursement requests. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The Organization has hired a new Chief Financial Officer as well as additional supporting staff within the finance department. Management understands the importance of reviewing the posting of credit memos or applicable invoices to ensure they are posted correctly. We will update our policy to include a process for review of credit memos prior to posting. The planned corrective action for this finding is currently in the process of development, approval, and implementation.
2020-108 Lack of Controls over Costs Submitted for Reimbursement (initially reported 2020) Assistance Listing Number: 93.224 Name of Federal Agency: Department of Health and Human Services, HRSA Program Title: Health Center Program (Community Health Centers, Migrant Health Centers, Health Care for the Homeless, and Public Housing Primary Care) Compliance Requirement: Activities Allowed, Allowable Costs and Period of Performance Pass-through Entity: N/A Federal Grant/Contract Number and Grant Year: 6H80CS06452-15 (2020), COVID-19 1H8CCS35035-01 (2020), COVID-19 1H8DCS36007-01 (2020) and COVID-19 1H8ECS39010-01 (2020) Finding Type: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Known Questioned Costs: $0 Condition: The Organization included an invoice for reimbursement under the program for which a vendor credit memo for the full amount of the invoice had been received due to miscoding of the credit memo to the correct COVID-19 class on the general ledger. In addition, the Organization did not include an applicable invoice for COVID-19 expenses for reimbursement due to the same miscoding of the COVID-19 class to the general ledger. Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.303 requires that nonfederal entities receiving federal awards establish and maintain internal control over the federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal awards. Under compliance requirements for allowable costs 2 CFR section 200.405(a)(1) costs should be incurred specifically for the federal award, and 2 CFR section 200.406(a) to the extent credits accruing or received by the nonfederal entity relate to allowable costs, they must be credited to the federal award program either as a cost reduction or cash refund as appropriate. Cause: The Organization did not apply the credit memo or the invoice to the correct general ledger classification resulting in the credit memo and invoice being incorrectly included or not included in the reimbursement request. Effect: The Organization is not applying for reimbursement with the correct supporting documentation which could lead to a loss of grant funding. Recommendation: The Organization should review the posting of any credit memos or applicable invoices to ensure they are posted to the correct account/classification so that only allowable costs which were incurred during the period of performance are included on any reimbursement requests. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The Organization has hired a new Chief Financial Officer as well as additional supporting staff within the finance department. Management understands the importance of reviewing the posting of credit memos or applicable invoices to ensure they are posted correctly. We will update our policy to include a process for review of credit memos prior to posting. The planned corrective action for this finding is currently in the process of development, approval, and implementation.
2020-108 Lack of Controls over Costs Submitted for Reimbursement (initially reported 2020) Assistance Listing Number: 93.224 Name of Federal Agency: Department of Health and Human Services, HRSA Program Title: Health Center Program (Community Health Centers, Migrant Health Centers, Health Care for the Homeless, and Public Housing Primary Care) Compliance Requirement: Activities Allowed, Allowable Costs and Period of Performance Pass-through Entity: N/A Federal Grant/Contract Number and Grant Year: 6H80CS06452-15 (2020), COVID-19 1H8CCS35035-01 (2020), COVID-19 1H8DCS36007-01 (2020) and COVID-19 1H8ECS39010-01 (2020) Finding Type: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Known Questioned Costs: $0 Condition: The Organization included an invoice for reimbursement under the program for which a vendor credit memo for the full amount of the invoice had been received due to miscoding of the credit memo to the correct COVID-19 class on the general ledger. In addition, the Organization did not include an applicable invoice for COVID-19 expenses for reimbursement due to the same miscoding of the COVID-19 class to the general ledger. Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.303 requires that nonfederal entities receiving federal awards establish and maintain internal control over the federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal awards. Under compliance requirements for allowable costs 2 CFR section 200.405(a)(1) costs should be incurred specifically for the federal award, and 2 CFR section 200.406(a) to the extent credits accruing or received by the nonfederal entity relate to allowable costs, they must be credited to the federal award program either as a cost reduction or cash refund as appropriate. Cause: The Organization did not apply the credit memo or the invoice to the correct general ledger classification resulting in the credit memo and invoice being incorrectly included or not included in the reimbursement request. Effect: The Organization is not applying for reimbursement with the correct supporting documentation which could lead to a loss of grant funding. Recommendation: The Organization should review the posting of any credit memos or applicable invoices to ensure they are posted to the correct account/classification so that only allowable costs which were incurred during the period of performance are included on any reimbursement requests. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The Organization has hired a new Chief Financial Officer as well as additional supporting staff within the finance department. Management understands the importance of reviewing the posting of credit memos or applicable invoices to ensure they are posted correctly. We will update our policy to include a process for review of credit memos prior to posting. The planned corrective action for this finding is currently in the process of development, approval, and implementation.
2020-108 Lack of Controls over Costs Submitted for Reimbursement (initially reported 2020) Assistance Listing Number: 93.224 Name of Federal Agency: Department of Health and Human Services, HRSA Program Title: Health Center Program (Community Health Centers, Migrant Health Centers, Health Care for the Homeless, and Public Housing Primary Care) Compliance Requirement: Activities Allowed, Allowable Costs and Period of Performance Pass-through Entity: N/A Federal Grant/Contract Number and Grant Year: 6H80CS06452-15 (2020), COVID-19 1H8CCS35035-01 (2020), COVID-19 1H8DCS36007-01 (2020) and COVID-19 1H8ECS39010-01 (2020) Finding Type: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Known Questioned Costs: $0 Condition: The Organization included an invoice for reimbursement under the program for which a vendor credit memo for the full amount of the invoice had been received due to miscoding of the credit memo to the correct COVID-19 class on the general ledger. In addition, the Organization did not include an applicable invoice for COVID-19 expenses for reimbursement due to the same miscoding of the COVID-19 class to the general ledger. Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.303 requires that nonfederal entities receiving federal awards establish and maintain internal control over the federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal awards. Under compliance requirements for allowable costs 2 CFR section 200.405(a)(1) costs should be incurred specifically for the federal award, and 2 CFR section 200.406(a) to the extent credits accruing or received by the nonfederal entity relate to allowable costs, they must be credited to the federal award program either as a cost reduction or cash refund as appropriate. Cause: The Organization did not apply the credit memo or the invoice to the correct general ledger classification resulting in the credit memo and invoice being incorrectly included or not included in the reimbursement request. Effect: The Organization is not applying for reimbursement with the correct supporting documentation which could lead to a loss of grant funding. Recommendation: The Organization should review the posting of any credit memos or applicable invoices to ensure they are posted to the correct account/classification so that only allowable costs which were incurred during the period of performance are included on any reimbursement requests. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The Organization has hired a new Chief Financial Officer as well as additional supporting staff within the finance department. Management understands the importance of reviewing the posting of credit memos or applicable invoices to ensure they are posted correctly. We will update our policy to include a process for review of credit memos prior to posting. The planned corrective action for this finding is currently in the process of development, approval, and implementation.
2020-108 Lack of Controls over Costs Submitted for Reimbursement (initially reported 2020) Assistance Listing Number: 93.224 Name of Federal Agency: Department of Health and Human Services, HRSA Program Title: Health Center Program (Community Health Centers, Migrant Health Centers, Health Care for the Homeless, and Public Housing Primary Care) Compliance Requirement: Activities Allowed, Allowable Costs and Period of Performance Pass-through Entity: N/A Federal Grant/Contract Number and Grant Year: 6H80CS06452-15 (2020), COVID-19 1H8CCS35035-01 (2020), COVID-19 1H8DCS36007-01 (2020) and COVID-19 1H8ECS39010-01 (2020) Finding Type: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Known Questioned Costs: $0 Condition: The Organization included an invoice for reimbursement under the program for which a vendor credit memo for the full amount of the invoice had been received due to miscoding of the credit memo to the correct COVID-19 class on the general ledger. In addition, the Organization did not include an applicable invoice for COVID-19 expenses for reimbursement due to the same miscoding of the COVID-19 class to the general ledger. Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.303 requires that nonfederal entities receiving federal awards establish and maintain internal control over the federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal awards. Under compliance requirements for allowable costs 2 CFR section 200.405(a)(1) costs should be incurred specifically for the federal award, and 2 CFR section 200.406(a) to the extent credits accruing or received by the nonfederal entity relate to allowable costs, they must be credited to the federal award program either as a cost reduction or cash refund as appropriate. Cause: The Organization did not apply the credit memo or the invoice to the correct general ledger classification resulting in the credit memo and invoice being incorrectly included or not included in the reimbursement request. Effect: The Organization is not applying for reimbursement with the correct supporting documentation which could lead to a loss of grant funding. Recommendation: The Organization should review the posting of any credit memos or applicable invoices to ensure they are posted to the correct account/classification so that only allowable costs which were incurred during the period of performance are included on any reimbursement requests. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The Organization has hired a new Chief Financial Officer as well as additional supporting staff within the finance department. Management understands the importance of reviewing the posting of credit memos or applicable invoices to ensure they are posted correctly. We will update our policy to include a process for review of credit memos prior to posting. The planned corrective action for this finding is currently in the process of development, approval, and implementation.
2020-108 Lack of Controls over Costs Submitted for Reimbursement (initially reported 2020) Assistance Listing Number: 93.224 Name of Federal Agency: Department of Health and Human Services, HRSA Program Title: Health Center Program (Community Health Centers, Migrant Health Centers, Health Care for the Homeless, and Public Housing Primary Care) Compliance Requirement: Activities Allowed, Allowable Costs and Period of Performance Pass-through Entity: N/A Federal Grant/Contract Number and Grant Year: 6H80CS06452-15 (2020), COVID-19 1H8CCS35035-01 (2020), COVID-19 1H8DCS36007-01 (2020) and COVID-19 1H8ECS39010-01 (2020) Finding Type: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Known Questioned Costs: $0 Condition: The Organization included an invoice for reimbursement under the program for which a vendor credit memo for the full amount of the invoice had been received due to miscoding of the credit memo to the correct COVID-19 class on the general ledger. In addition, the Organization did not include an applicable invoice for COVID-19 expenses for reimbursement due to the same miscoding of the COVID-19 class to the general ledger. Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.303 requires that nonfederal entities receiving federal awards establish and maintain internal control over the federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal awards. Under compliance requirements for allowable costs 2 CFR section 200.405(a)(1) costs should be incurred specifically for the federal award, and 2 CFR section 200.406(a) to the extent credits accruing or received by the nonfederal entity relate to allowable costs, they must be credited to the federal award program either as a cost reduction or cash refund as appropriate. Cause: The Organization did not apply the credit memo or the invoice to the correct general ledger classification resulting in the credit memo and invoice being incorrectly included or not included in the reimbursement request. Effect: The Organization is not applying for reimbursement with the correct supporting documentation which could lead to a loss of grant funding. Recommendation: The Organization should review the posting of any credit memos or applicable invoices to ensure they are posted to the correct account/classification so that only allowable costs which were incurred during the period of performance are included on any reimbursement requests. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The Organization has hired a new Chief Financial Officer as well as additional supporting staff within the finance department. Management understands the importance of reviewing the posting of credit memos or applicable invoices to ensure they are posted correctly. We will update our policy to include a process for review of credit memos prior to posting. The planned corrective action for this finding is currently in the process of development, approval, and implementation.