Finding 2022 004 Federal Program Title ? Research & Development Cluster Assistance Listing Nos. ? As listed on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Federal Agencies ? U.S. Department of Agriculture, U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Department of Defense, U.S. Department of Interior, U.S. Department of Justice, Department of State, U.S. Department of Transportation, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, National Endowment for the Humanities, National Science Foundation, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, U.S. Department of Energy, U.S. Department of Education, and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Award Numbers ? As listed on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Grant Award Periods ? Various Compliance Requirement ? Period of Performance Criteria: As set forth in 2 CFR Section 200.403, the University may charge only allowable costs incurred during the approved budget period of a federal award?s period of performance. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: While performing period of performance procedures specific to the population of grants with period ending dates during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2022, we noted five grants (with expenditures totaling $9,335) of sixty sampled (with expenditures totaling $76,419) where the expenditure incurred date was after the end of the period of performance and expenditures were still being recorded that were incurred up to 120 days past the end of the period of performance for the following awards: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table The periods of performance ended during fiscal year 2022 was one-hundred and five grants. Additionally, while performing period of performance procedures specific to adjustments (including cost transfers) made during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2022, we noted nine cost transfers (totaling $27,865) of sixty sampled (totaling $3,153,441) where the expenditure incurred date was after the end of the period of performance for the following awards: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Positive cost transfers of approximately $4,060,000 and negative cost transfers of $3,510,000 were made during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2022. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure costs were not recorded to federal grants beyond the end date of the award?s period of performance. Questioned Cost: Questioned costs are not determinable. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated there was a missing automated control in Workday which would prevent expenditures from being charged to the grant after the period of performance end date. The lack of an automated control contributed to the noncompliance with the period of performance compliance requirement. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2021 004. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University take a fresh look at the existing policies, procedures and internal controls to ensure costs charged to federal awards are within the period of performance. We recommend the University consider implementing an automated control within Workday that prevents the recording/posting of transactions within a specified timeframe after the end of each grants period of performance. Additionally, we recommend the University consider its existing policies and processes around the automatic posting of payroll charges and consider additional internal controls that would prevent payroll charges from being charged beyond the end date of the award?s period of performance.
Finding 2022 004 Federal Program Title ? Research & Development Cluster Assistance Listing Nos. ? As listed on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Federal Agencies ? U.S. Department of Agriculture, U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Department of Defense, U.S. Department of Interior, U.S. Department of Justice, Department of State, U.S. Department of Transportation, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, National Endowment for the Humanities, National Science Foundation, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, U.S. Department of Energy, U.S. Department of Education, and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Award Numbers ? As listed on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Grant Award Periods ? Various Compliance Requirement ? Period of Performance Criteria: As set forth in 2 CFR Section 200.403, the University may charge only allowable costs incurred during the approved budget period of a federal award?s period of performance. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: While performing period of performance procedures specific to the population of grants with period ending dates during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2022, we noted five grants (with expenditures totaling $9,335) of sixty sampled (with expenditures totaling $76,419) where the expenditure incurred date was after the end of the period of performance and expenditures were still being recorded that were incurred up to 120 days past the end of the period of performance for the following awards: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table The periods of performance ended during fiscal year 2022 was one-hundred and five grants. Additionally, while performing period of performance procedures specific to adjustments (including cost transfers) made during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2022, we noted nine cost transfers (totaling $27,865) of sixty sampled (totaling $3,153,441) where the expenditure incurred date was after the end of the period of performance for the following awards: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Positive cost transfers of approximately $4,060,000 and negative cost transfers of $3,510,000 were made during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2022. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure costs were not recorded to federal grants beyond the end date of the award?s period of performance. Questioned Cost: Questioned costs are not determinable. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated there was a missing automated control in Workday which would prevent expenditures from being charged to the grant after the period of performance end date. The lack of an automated control contributed to the noncompliance with the period of performance compliance requirement. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2021 004. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University take a fresh look at the existing policies, procedures and internal controls to ensure costs charged to federal awards are within the period of performance. We recommend the University consider implementing an automated control within Workday that prevents the recording/posting of transactions within a specified timeframe after the end of each grants period of performance. Additionally, we recommend the University consider its existing policies and processes around the automatic posting of payroll charges and consider additional internal controls that would prevent payroll charges from being charged beyond the end date of the award?s period of performance.
Finding 2022 004 Federal Program Title ? Research & Development Cluster Assistance Listing Nos. ? As listed on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Federal Agencies ? U.S. Department of Agriculture, U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Department of Defense, U.S. Department of Interior, U.S. Department of Justice, Department of State, U.S. Department of Transportation, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, National Endowment for the Humanities, National Science Foundation, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, U.S. Department of Energy, U.S. Department of Education, and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Award Numbers ? As listed on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Grant Award Periods ? Various Compliance Requirement ? Period of Performance Criteria: As set forth in 2 CFR Section 200.403, the University may charge only allowable costs incurred during the approved budget period of a federal award?s period of performance. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: While performing period of performance procedures specific to the population of grants with period ending dates during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2022, we noted five grants (with expenditures totaling $9,335) of sixty sampled (with expenditures totaling $76,419) where the expenditure incurred date was after the end of the period of performance and expenditures were still being recorded that were incurred up to 120 days past the end of the period of performance for the following awards: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table The periods of performance ended during fiscal year 2022 was one-hundred and five grants. Additionally, while performing period of performance procedures specific to adjustments (including cost transfers) made during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2022, we noted nine cost transfers (totaling $27,865) of sixty sampled (totaling $3,153,441) where the expenditure incurred date was after the end of the period of performance for the following awards: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Positive cost transfers of approximately $4,060,000 and negative cost transfers of $3,510,000 were made during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2022. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure costs were not recorded to federal grants beyond the end date of the award?s period of performance. Questioned Cost: Questioned costs are not determinable. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated there was a missing automated control in Workday which would prevent expenditures from being charged to the grant after the period of performance end date. The lack of an automated control contributed to the noncompliance with the period of performance compliance requirement. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2021 004. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University take a fresh look at the existing policies, procedures and internal controls to ensure costs charged to federal awards are within the period of performance. We recommend the University consider implementing an automated control within Workday that prevents the recording/posting of transactions within a specified timeframe after the end of each grants period of performance. Additionally, we recommend the University consider its existing policies and processes around the automatic posting of payroll charges and consider additional internal controls that would prevent payroll charges from being charged beyond the end date of the award?s period of performance.
Finding 2022 004 Federal Program Title ? Research & Development Cluster Assistance Listing Nos. ? As listed on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Federal Agencies ? U.S. Department of Agriculture, U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Department of Defense, U.S. Department of Interior, U.S. Department of Justice, Department of State, U.S. Department of Transportation, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, National Endowment for the Humanities, National Science Foundation, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, U.S. Department of Energy, U.S. Department of Education, and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Award Numbers ? As listed on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Grant Award Periods ? Various Compliance Requirement ? Period of Performance Criteria: As set forth in 2 CFR Section 200.403, the University may charge only allowable costs incurred during the approved budget period of a federal award?s period of performance. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: While performing period of performance procedures specific to the population of grants with period ending dates during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2022, we noted five grants (with expenditures totaling $9,335) of sixty sampled (with expenditures totaling $76,419) where the expenditure incurred date was after the end of the period of performance and expenditures were still being recorded that were incurred up to 120 days past the end of the period of performance for the following awards: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table The periods of performance ended during fiscal year 2022 was one-hundred and five grants. Additionally, while performing period of performance procedures specific to adjustments (including cost transfers) made during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2022, we noted nine cost transfers (totaling $27,865) of sixty sampled (totaling $3,153,441) where the expenditure incurred date was after the end of the period of performance for the following awards: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Positive cost transfers of approximately $4,060,000 and negative cost transfers of $3,510,000 were made during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2022. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure costs were not recorded to federal grants beyond the end date of the award?s period of performance. Questioned Cost: Questioned costs are not determinable. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated there was a missing automated control in Workday which would prevent expenditures from being charged to the grant after the period of performance end date. The lack of an automated control contributed to the noncompliance with the period of performance compliance requirement. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2021 004. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University take a fresh look at the existing policies, procedures and internal controls to ensure costs charged to federal awards are within the period of performance. We recommend the University consider implementing an automated control within Workday that prevents the recording/posting of transactions within a specified timeframe after the end of each grants period of performance. Additionally, we recommend the University consider its existing policies and processes around the automatic posting of payroll charges and consider additional internal controls that would prevent payroll charges from being charged beyond the end date of the award?s period of performance.
Finding 2022 004 Federal Program Title ? Research & Development Cluster Assistance Listing Nos. ? As listed on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Federal Agencies ? U.S. Department of Agriculture, U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Department of Defense, U.S. Department of Interior, U.S. Department of Justice, Department of State, U.S. Department of Transportation, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, National Endowment for the Humanities, National Science Foundation, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, U.S. Department of Energy, U.S. Department of Education, and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Award Numbers ? As listed on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Grant Award Periods ? Various Compliance Requirement ? Period of Performance Criteria: As set forth in 2 CFR Section 200.403, the University may charge only allowable costs incurred during the approved budget period of a federal award?s period of performance. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: While performing period of performance procedures specific to the population of grants with period ending dates during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2022, we noted five grants (with expenditures totaling $9,335) of sixty sampled (with expenditures totaling $76,419) where the expenditure incurred date was after the end of the period of performance and expenditures were still being recorded that were incurred up to 120 days past the end of the period of performance for the following awards: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table The periods of performance ended during fiscal year 2022 was one-hundred and five grants. Additionally, while performing period of performance procedures specific to adjustments (including cost transfers) made during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2022, we noted nine cost transfers (totaling $27,865) of sixty sampled (totaling $3,153,441) where the expenditure incurred date was after the end of the period of performance for the following awards: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Positive cost transfers of approximately $4,060,000 and negative cost transfers of $3,510,000 were made during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2022. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure costs were not recorded to federal grants beyond the end date of the award?s period of performance. Questioned Cost: Questioned costs are not determinable. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated there was a missing automated control in Workday which would prevent expenditures from being charged to the grant after the period of performance end date. The lack of an automated control contributed to the noncompliance with the period of performance compliance requirement. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2021 004. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University take a fresh look at the existing policies, procedures and internal controls to ensure costs charged to federal awards are within the period of performance. We recommend the University consider implementing an automated control within Workday that prevents the recording/posting of transactions within a specified timeframe after the end of each grants period of performance. Additionally, we recommend the University consider its existing policies and processes around the automatic posting of payroll charges and consider additional internal controls that would prevent payroll charges from being charged beyond the end date of the award?s period of performance.
Finding 2022 004 Federal Program Title ? Research & Development Cluster Assistance Listing Nos. ? As listed on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Federal Agencies ? U.S. Department of Agriculture, U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Department of Defense, U.S. Department of Interior, U.S. Department of Justice, Department of State, U.S. Department of Transportation, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, National Endowment for the Humanities, National Science Foundation, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, U.S. Department of Energy, U.S. Department of Education, and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Award Numbers ? As listed on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Grant Award Periods ? Various Compliance Requirement ? Period of Performance Criteria: As set forth in 2 CFR Section 200.403, the University may charge only allowable costs incurred during the approved budget period of a federal award?s period of performance. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: While performing period of performance procedures specific to the population of grants with period ending dates during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2022, we noted five grants (with expenditures totaling $9,335) of sixty sampled (with expenditures totaling $76,419) where the expenditure incurred date was after the end of the period of performance and expenditures were still being recorded that were incurred up to 120 days past the end of the period of performance for the following awards: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table The periods of performance ended during fiscal year 2022 was one-hundred and five grants. Additionally, while performing period of performance procedures specific to adjustments (including cost transfers) made during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2022, we noted nine cost transfers (totaling $27,865) of sixty sampled (totaling $3,153,441) where the expenditure incurred date was after the end of the period of performance for the following awards: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Positive cost transfers of approximately $4,060,000 and negative cost transfers of $3,510,000 were made during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2022. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure costs were not recorded to federal grants beyond the end date of the award?s period of performance. Questioned Cost: Questioned costs are not determinable. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated there was a missing automated control in Workday which would prevent expenditures from being charged to the grant after the period of performance end date. The lack of an automated control contributed to the noncompliance with the period of performance compliance requirement. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2021 004. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University take a fresh look at the existing policies, procedures and internal controls to ensure costs charged to federal awards are within the period of performance. We recommend the University consider implementing an automated control within Workday that prevents the recording/posting of transactions within a specified timeframe after the end of each grants period of performance. Additionally, we recommend the University consider its existing policies and processes around the automatic posting of payroll charges and consider additional internal controls that would prevent payroll charges from being charged beyond the end date of the award?s period of performance.
Finding 2022 004 Federal Program Title ? Research & Development Cluster Assistance Listing Nos. ? As listed on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Federal Agencies ? U.S. Department of Agriculture, U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Department of Defense, U.S. Department of Interior, U.S. Department of Justice, Department of State, U.S. Department of Transportation, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, National Endowment for the Humanities, National Science Foundation, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, U.S. Department of Energy, U.S. Department of Education, and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Award Numbers ? As listed on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Grant Award Periods ? Various Compliance Requirement ? Period of Performance Criteria: As set forth in 2 CFR Section 200.403, the University may charge only allowable costs incurred during the approved budget period of a federal award?s period of performance. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: While performing period of performance procedures specific to the population of grants with period ending dates during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2022, we noted five grants (with expenditures totaling $9,335) of sixty sampled (with expenditures totaling $76,419) where the expenditure incurred date was after the end of the period of performance and expenditures were still being recorded that were incurred up to 120 days past the end of the period of performance for the following awards: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table The periods of performance ended during fiscal year 2022 was one-hundred and five grants. Additionally, while performing period of performance procedures specific to adjustments (including cost transfers) made during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2022, we noted nine cost transfers (totaling $27,865) of sixty sampled (totaling $3,153,441) where the expenditure incurred date was after the end of the period of performance for the following awards: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Positive cost transfers of approximately $4,060,000 and negative cost transfers of $3,510,000 were made during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2022. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure costs were not recorded to federal grants beyond the end date of the award?s period of performance. Questioned Cost: Questioned costs are not determinable. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated there was a missing automated control in Workday which would prevent expenditures from being charged to the grant after the period of performance end date. The lack of an automated control contributed to the noncompliance with the period of performance compliance requirement. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2021 004. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University take a fresh look at the existing policies, procedures and internal controls to ensure costs charged to federal awards are within the period of performance. We recommend the University consider implementing an automated control within Workday that prevents the recording/posting of transactions within a specified timeframe after the end of each grants period of performance. Additionally, we recommend the University consider its existing policies and processes around the automatic posting of payroll charges and consider additional internal controls that would prevent payroll charges from being charged beyond the end date of the award?s period of performance.
Finding Number: 2022-001 Repeat Finding: Yes, 2021-002 Program Names/Assistance Listing Titles: Assistance Listing Numbers: Federal Award Numbers: Questioned Costs: Indian School Equalization 15.042 A19AV00933 N/A Education Stabilization Fund 84.425 A19AV00933 N/A Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-Through Agency: Bureau of Indian Education Type of Finding: Noncompliance, Material Weakness Compliance Requirement: Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles CRITERIA Hall management is responsible for establishing and maintaining internal controls over disbursements that are adequate to ensure all financial activities are properly processed and reported. Additionally, the Hall is required, except where otherwise authorized by statute, to ensure costs meet the general criteria outlined in 2 CFR 200.403 in order to be allowable under federal awards, including the costs be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. Indian tribes and tribal organizations may without the approval of the BIA expend funds provided under a self-determination contract for purposes identified in 25 USC 46, to the extent that the expenditure of the funds is supportive of a contracted program (USC 46). These guidelines require internal controls over expenditures, including the use of requisitions or purchase orders, to ensure expenditures comply with federal regulations and guidelines. (25 CFR 39; 25 CFR 900). Indian tribes and tribal organizations may, without the approval of the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA), expend funds provided under a self-determination contract for purposes identified in 25?SC 450j-l(k), to the extent that the expenditure of the funds is supportive of a contracted program?25 USC 450j-l(k)). These guidelines require internal controls over expenditures of federal monies, including the use of requisitions or purchase orders, to ensure expenditures comply with federal regulations and guidelines (25 CFR 39; 25 CFR 45; 25 CFR 900). CONDITION The Hall did not follow its Board adopted policies for federal regulations regarding disbursements and payroll to ensure all financial activities were properly processed, recorded in the appropriate fiscal year, and supported. CAUSE The Hall has not always implemented and followed controls over disbursement and payroll transactions. EFFECT The Hall was not in compliance with Board adopted policies for federal regulations and guidelines. CONTEXT The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. The following items were noted during our review of disbursement transactions: ? For one of 10 travel reimbursements reviewed, adequate backup was not retained to support the reimbursement. ? For one of 10 travel reimbursements reviewed, there was an overpayment of $33. ? For two of 45 disbursements reviewed, the goods or services were received prior to the issuance and approval of the purchase order. ? For two of 45 disbursements reviewed and two of 14 disbursements reviewed for cutoff, there was no receiving report received; therefore could not be determined if the goods or services were received prior to payment. ? For five of 14 cutoff selections reviewed, the expenditure was recorded in the fiscal year 2023 but should have been in fiscal year 2022. Audit adjustments were required to properly report the financial statements. ? For five of 45 disbursements reviewed, the goods or services were received after the payment was made. ? For one of 45 disbursements reviewed, the quantity on the receiving report did not match the purchase order. ? For one of 40 employee payrolls reviewed, the employee received backpay, but the Hall was unable to provide supporting documentation for the backpay. ? The Department of Treasury guidelines for using ARPA funds for hazard pay at a limit of $25,000 per employee. The Hall had three employees who exceeded this limit during the 2022 fiscal year. ? The Hall had a current year overexpenditure in the Education Stabilization Fund grant by $48,608. ? For one of 40 employee payrolls reviewed, the employee was overpaid by $160.55. RECOMMENDATION The Hall should adhere to its Board adopted policies and federal regulations and ensure all transactions are supported. VIEWS OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS See Corrective Action Plan.
Finding Number: 2022-001 Repeat Finding: Yes, 2021-002 Program Names/Assistance Listing Titles: Assistance Listing Numbers: Federal Award Numbers: Questioned Costs: Indian School Equalization 15.042 A19AV00933 N/A Education Stabilization Fund 84.425 A19AV00933 N/A Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-Through Agency: Bureau of Indian Education Type of Finding: Noncompliance, Material Weakness Compliance Requirement: Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles CRITERIA Hall management is responsible for establishing and maintaining internal controls over disbursements that are adequate to ensure all financial activities are properly processed and reported. Additionally, the Hall is required, except where otherwise authorized by statute, to ensure costs meet the general criteria outlined in 2 CFR 200.403 in order to be allowable under federal awards, including the costs be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. Indian tribes and tribal organizations may without the approval of the BIA expend funds provided under a self-determination contract for purposes identified in 25 USC 46, to the extent that the expenditure of the funds is supportive of a contracted program (USC 46). These guidelines require internal controls over expenditures, including the use of requisitions or purchase orders, to ensure expenditures comply with federal regulations and guidelines. (25 CFR 39; 25 CFR 900). Indian tribes and tribal organizations may, without the approval of the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA), expend funds provided under a self-determination contract for purposes identified in 25?SC 450j-l(k), to the extent that the expenditure of the funds is supportive of a contracted program?25 USC 450j-l(k)). These guidelines require internal controls over expenditures of federal monies, including the use of requisitions or purchase orders, to ensure expenditures comply with federal regulations and guidelines (25 CFR 39; 25 CFR 45; 25 CFR 900). CONDITION The Hall did not follow its Board adopted policies for federal regulations regarding disbursements and payroll to ensure all financial activities were properly processed, recorded in the appropriate fiscal year, and supported. CAUSE The Hall has not always implemented and followed controls over disbursement and payroll transactions. EFFECT The Hall was not in compliance with Board adopted policies for federal regulations and guidelines. CONTEXT The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. The following items were noted during our review of disbursement transactions: ? For one of 10 travel reimbursements reviewed, adequate backup was not retained to support the reimbursement. ? For one of 10 travel reimbursements reviewed, there was an overpayment of $33. ? For two of 45 disbursements reviewed, the goods or services were received prior to the issuance and approval of the purchase order. ? For two of 45 disbursements reviewed and two of 14 disbursements reviewed for cutoff, there was no receiving report received; therefore could not be determined if the goods or services were received prior to payment. ? For five of 14 cutoff selections reviewed, the expenditure was recorded in the fiscal year 2023 but should have been in fiscal year 2022. Audit adjustments were required to properly report the financial statements. ? For five of 45 disbursements reviewed, the goods or services were received after the payment was made. ? For one of 45 disbursements reviewed, the quantity on the receiving report did not match the purchase order. ? For one of 40 employee payrolls reviewed, the employee received backpay, but the Hall was unable to provide supporting documentation for the backpay. ? The Department of Treasury guidelines for using ARPA funds for hazard pay at a limit of $25,000 per employee. The Hall had three employees who exceeded this limit during the 2022 fiscal year. ? The Hall had a current year overexpenditure in the Education Stabilization Fund grant by $48,608. ? For one of 40 employee payrolls reviewed, the employee was overpaid by $160.55. RECOMMENDATION The Hall should adhere to its Board adopted policies and federal regulations and ensure all transactions are supported. VIEWS OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS See Corrective Action Plan.
Finding Number: 2022-001 Repeat Finding: Yes, 2021-002 Program Names/Assistance Listing Titles: Assistance Listing Numbers: Federal Award Numbers: Questioned Costs: Indian School Equalization 15.042 A19AV00933 N/A Education Stabilization Fund 84.425 A19AV00933 N/A Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-Through Agency: Bureau of Indian Education Type of Finding: Noncompliance, Material Weakness Compliance Requirement: Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles CRITERIA Hall management is responsible for establishing and maintaining internal controls over disbursements that are adequate to ensure all financial activities are properly processed and reported. Additionally, the Hall is required, except where otherwise authorized by statute, to ensure costs meet the general criteria outlined in 2 CFR 200.403 in order to be allowable under federal awards, including the costs be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. Indian tribes and tribal organizations may without the approval of the BIA expend funds provided under a self-determination contract for purposes identified in 25 USC 46, to the extent that the expenditure of the funds is supportive of a contracted program (USC 46). These guidelines require internal controls over expenditures, including the use of requisitions or purchase orders, to ensure expenditures comply with federal regulations and guidelines. (25 CFR 39; 25 CFR 900). Indian tribes and tribal organizations may, without the approval of the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA), expend funds provided under a self-determination contract for purposes identified in 25?SC 450j-l(k), to the extent that the expenditure of the funds is supportive of a contracted program?25 USC 450j-l(k)). These guidelines require internal controls over expenditures of federal monies, including the use of requisitions or purchase orders, to ensure expenditures comply with federal regulations and guidelines (25 CFR 39; 25 CFR 45; 25 CFR 900). CONDITION The Hall did not follow its Board adopted policies for federal regulations regarding disbursements and payroll to ensure all financial activities were properly processed, recorded in the appropriate fiscal year, and supported. CAUSE The Hall has not always implemented and followed controls over disbursement and payroll transactions. EFFECT The Hall was not in compliance with Board adopted policies for federal regulations and guidelines. CONTEXT The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. The following items were noted during our review of disbursement transactions: ? For one of 10 travel reimbursements reviewed, adequate backup was not retained to support the reimbursement. ? For one of 10 travel reimbursements reviewed, there was an overpayment of $33. ? For two of 45 disbursements reviewed, the goods or services were received prior to the issuance and approval of the purchase order. ? For two of 45 disbursements reviewed and two of 14 disbursements reviewed for cutoff, there was no receiving report received; therefore could not be determined if the goods or services were received prior to payment. ? For five of 14 cutoff selections reviewed, the expenditure was recorded in the fiscal year 2023 but should have been in fiscal year 2022. Audit adjustments were required to properly report the financial statements. ? For five of 45 disbursements reviewed, the goods or services were received after the payment was made. ? For one of 45 disbursements reviewed, the quantity on the receiving report did not match the purchase order. ? For one of 40 employee payrolls reviewed, the employee received backpay, but the Hall was unable to provide supporting documentation for the backpay. ? The Department of Treasury guidelines for using ARPA funds for hazard pay at a limit of $25,000 per employee. The Hall had three employees who exceeded this limit during the 2022 fiscal year. ? The Hall had a current year overexpenditure in the Education Stabilization Fund grant by $48,608. ? For one of 40 employee payrolls reviewed, the employee was overpaid by $160.55. RECOMMENDATION The Hall should adhere to its Board adopted policies and federal regulations and ensure all transactions are supported. VIEWS OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS See Corrective Action Plan.
Finding Number: 2022-001 Repeat Finding: Yes, 2021-002 Program Names/Assistance Listing Titles: Assistance Listing Numbers: Federal Award Numbers: Questioned Costs: Indian School Equalization 15.042 A19AV00933 N/A Education Stabilization Fund 84.425 A19AV00933 N/A Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-Through Agency: Bureau of Indian Education Type of Finding: Noncompliance, Material Weakness Compliance Requirement: Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles CRITERIA Hall management is responsible for establishing and maintaining internal controls over disbursements that are adequate to ensure all financial activities are properly processed and reported. Additionally, the Hall is required, except where otherwise authorized by statute, to ensure costs meet the general criteria outlined in 2 CFR 200.403 in order to be allowable under federal awards, including the costs be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. Indian tribes and tribal organizations may without the approval of the BIA expend funds provided under a self-determination contract for purposes identified in 25 USC 46, to the extent that the expenditure of the funds is supportive of a contracted program (USC 46). These guidelines require internal controls over expenditures, including the use of requisitions or purchase orders, to ensure expenditures comply with federal regulations and guidelines. (25 CFR 39; 25 CFR 900). Indian tribes and tribal organizations may, without the approval of the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA), expend funds provided under a self-determination contract for purposes identified in 25?SC 450j-l(k), to the extent that the expenditure of the funds is supportive of a contracted program?25 USC 450j-l(k)). These guidelines require internal controls over expenditures of federal monies, including the use of requisitions or purchase orders, to ensure expenditures comply with federal regulations and guidelines (25 CFR 39; 25 CFR 45; 25 CFR 900). CONDITION The Hall did not follow its Board adopted policies for federal regulations regarding disbursements and payroll to ensure all financial activities were properly processed, recorded in the appropriate fiscal year, and supported. CAUSE The Hall has not always implemented and followed controls over disbursement and payroll transactions. EFFECT The Hall was not in compliance with Board adopted policies for federal regulations and guidelines. CONTEXT The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. The following items were noted during our review of disbursement transactions: ? For one of 10 travel reimbursements reviewed, adequate backup was not retained to support the reimbursement. ? For one of 10 travel reimbursements reviewed, there was an overpayment of $33. ? For two of 45 disbursements reviewed, the goods or services were received prior to the issuance and approval of the purchase order. ? For two of 45 disbursements reviewed and two of 14 disbursements reviewed for cutoff, there was no receiving report received; therefore could not be determined if the goods or services were received prior to payment. ? For five of 14 cutoff selections reviewed, the expenditure was recorded in the fiscal year 2023 but should have been in fiscal year 2022. Audit adjustments were required to properly report the financial statements. ? For five of 45 disbursements reviewed, the goods or services were received after the payment was made. ? For one of 45 disbursements reviewed, the quantity on the receiving report did not match the purchase order. ? For one of 40 employee payrolls reviewed, the employee received backpay, but the Hall was unable to provide supporting documentation for the backpay. ? The Department of Treasury guidelines for using ARPA funds for hazard pay at a limit of $25,000 per employee. The Hall had three employees who exceeded this limit during the 2022 fiscal year. ? The Hall had a current year overexpenditure in the Education Stabilization Fund grant by $48,608. ? For one of 40 employee payrolls reviewed, the employee was overpaid by $160.55. RECOMMENDATION The Hall should adhere to its Board adopted policies and federal regulations and ensure all transactions are supported. VIEWS OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS See Corrective Action Plan.
2022-035 The Department of Children, Youth, and Families did not have adequate internal controls over and did not comply with requirements to ensure payments to child care providers paid with Temporary Assistance for Needy Families funds were allowable and properly supported. Assistance Listing Number and Title: 93.558 Temporary Assistance for Needy Families Federal Grantor Name: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Award/Contract Number: 2101WATANF; 2201WATANF Pass-through Entity Name: None Pass-through Award/Contract Number: None Applicable Compliance Component: Activities Allowed or Unallowed Allowable Costs / Cost Principles Known Questioned Cost Amount: $67,699,429 Background The Department of Social and Health Services (DSHS), Community Services Office, administers the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) grant that provides temporary cash assistance for families in need. To receive TANF benefits, participants must be engaged in activities listed in the Individual Responsibility Plan through the WorkFirst program, unless the TANF benefits are received only on behalf of a child. TANF grant funds are also used to pay clients? child care costs to meet one of the program?s primary purposes of helping clients obtain employment. Washington has established the Working Connections Child Care (WCCC) program to help eligible working families pay for child care. Both the Department of Children, Youth, and Families (Department) and DSHS administer the program. The Department is responsible for establishing policies and procedures for licensing child care providers and paying them for allowable child care services. DSHS determines TANF client eligibility and reimburses the Department for child care payments under an agreement between the two agencies. The Department uses its Social Service Payment System (SSPS) to process the payments it makes to child care providers. The system allocates payments to various funding sources, based on the eligibility of the client. These funding sources include multiple federal programs, multiple Child Care Development Fund (CCDF) federal grant awards, and state funding. The Department uploads the payment data into the state?s accounting system at a summary level based on the various funding sources. DSHS worked with the Department to setup coding in the Payment Allocating Model (PAM) system that looks at the client-level information and then assigns the correct TANF source of funds. Once source of funds is identified, that information is then sent to SSPS for allocation assignment. The Department prepares electronic reports for funds allocated to TANF funding sources and sends DSHS a monthly bill. There is always a need to transfer the funding sources for some payments throughout the year to manage federal and state funds properly. Prior to state fiscal year 2021, the Department prepared supporting documentation for transfers that included details of what payments it was transferring. The purpose of documenting this detail was to maintain proper support for federal expenditures. Some payments the Department makes for child care are funded by both the CCDF and TANF grants. While the two federal programs are separate, the requirements and policies in Washington for child care payments are consolidated under the WCCC program. Federal regulations require grant fund expenditures to be adequately supported to show that they have been used in accordance with program requirements. In fiscal year 2022, DSHS incurred $67,699,429 in child care service-related expenditures. Federal regulations require recipients to establish and follow internal controls that ensure compliance with program requirements. These controls include understanding grant requirements and monitoring the effectiveness of established controls. In the prior audit, we reported the Department did not have adequate internal controls over and did not comply with requirements to ensure payments to child care providers paid with TANF funds were allowable and properly supported. The prior finding number was 2021-028. Description of Condition The Department did not have adequate internal controls over and did not comply with requirements to ensure payments to child care providers paid with TANF funds were allowable and properly supported. In order to identify TANF-funded payments the Department made to child care providers, we requested a population of payments charged to TANF sources from SSPS. However, during the fiscal year 2021 audit, management informed us the Department had changed its grant management practices to process expenditure transfers at the grant level. This new process made the original expenditure coding in SSPS inaccurate and unreliable for testing. As a result, we could not trace the federal funds to a level of expenditure adequate to establish whether the Department spent TANF funds in accordance with federal and state regulations. As a result, we could not test the Department?s payments to child care providers for compliance with activities allowed and cost principles. We consider these internal control deficiencies to be a material weakness, which led to material noncompliance. Cause of Condition The Department is required to maintain sufficient documentation for each payment it makes with federal dollars. Management decided to modify the Department?s accounting practices in a way that now prevents it from meeting this requirement. The Department implemented what management referred to as fund-level accounting. This consisted of making significant accounting adjustments between funding sources in its general ledger without identifying the underlying transactions from SSPS that supported the adjustments. This affected all populations of child care expenditures for every month of the fiscal year. Officials from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services informed the Department that these accounting practices do not comply with federal law, but management said they believe they are compliant. Effect of Condition and Questioned Costs By not complying with federal law regarding maintaining adequate supporting documentation for expenditures, the Department created a condition that made it impossible for our Office to audit the federal dollars it used for payments to child care providers. Because we could not test transaction-level detail, we also could not determine whether the issues we identified in prior audits had improved or worsened, including the Department?s lack of adequate internal controls and significant rate of noncompliance for payments to child care providers. Because the Department did not comply with federal requirements to allow for the tracing of grant expenditures to a payment level, we are questioning all $67,699,429 in federal program costs for child care payments that DSHS incurred during the audit period. We question costs when we find an agency has not complied with grant regulations or when it does not have adequate documentation to support its expenditures. Recommendations We recommend the Department: ? Design and implement internal controls to ensure transaction-level data is sufficient to comply with federal law and state rules ? Update service level agreements with DSHS to ensure payments are sufficient and properly supported ? Consult with the grantor to discuss whether the questioned costs identified in the audit should be repaid Department?s Response The Working Connections Child Care (WCCC) program was previously managed by the Department of Social and Health Services (DSHS) and the Department of Early Learning. Since the program transitioned in 2019, the Department has been making efforts to strengthen internal controls over payments to child care providers and other grant requirements. The Department implemented grant-level management of all federal funds, including the TANF grant. The Department allocated the TANF grant to eligible clients and allowable activities in compliance with 45 CFR 98.67. For the fiscal year 2021 program audit, the State Auditor?s Office (SAO) issued a finding with $32 questioned costs for non-compliance with the CCDF eligibility requirement. No other findings, management letters, or exit items were reported in this compliance area or the cost allocation of funds based on eligibility for the CCDF or TANF grants. Given that eligibility or cost allocation has not been an area of concern, and transfers were processed between TANF and CCDF source of funds with the same eligibility criteria, the Department is assured that TANF funding was spent appropriately within federal regulations. In the Cause of Condition, the SAO stated, ?HHS officials informed the Department that these accounting practices do not comply with federal law, but management said they believe they are compliant.? The Department does not agree with this interpretation of the meeting outcome. During this informal meeting, on February 23, 2022, the State Auditor?s Office, Office of Financial Management, and the Department met with HHS and they stated they would not offer an opinion until they received the completed finding from the state. As part of the audit resolution process, HHS Administration for Children and Families?, which oversees the TANF and CCDF programs at the federal level, reviews all SAO findings and issues management decision letters. The letters will reflect the grantor?s determination of whether an audit finding is sustained, the reasons for the decision, and the required actions by the auditee. When a management decision is issued for the fiscal year 2022 finding, the Department will work with HHS and follow the audit resolution process. The Department is committed to improving internal controls. The Department does not currently have the resources to develop and maintain the business process redesign, as well as the information technology initiatives necessary to meet the level of assurance recommended by SAO. In response to prior year?s audit recommendations, the Department has submitted a budget request to the Legislature in the 2023-2025 biennial budget for additional resources to process adjustments to include transaction-level data. Auditor?s Remarks The level of assurance needed to support grant expenditures is not established by our Office, but in titles 2 and 45 of the Code of Federal Regulations and the State?s grant award. We appreciate the Department?s commitment to resolving these matters and will review the status of the Department?s corrective action during our next audit. Applicable Laws and Regulations Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), section 516, Audit findings, establishes reporting requirements for audit findings. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Guidance, section 303, Internal controls, describes the requirements for auditees to maintain internal controls over federal programs and comply with federal program requirements. Title 2 CFR Part 200.1, Uniform Guidance establishes definitions for improper payments. Part 200.53 defines improper payments. Part 200.403 establishes factors affecting allowability of costs. Part 200.410 establishes requirements for the collection of unallowable costs. The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants defines significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in its Codification of Statements on Auditing Standards, section 935, Compliance Audits, paragraph 11.
2022-035 The Department of Children, Youth, and Families did not have adequate internal controls over and did not comply with requirements to ensure payments to child care providers paid with Temporary Assistance for Needy Families funds were allowable and properly supported. Assistance Listing Number and Title: 93.558 Temporary Assistance for Needy Families Federal Grantor Name: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Award/Contract Number: 2101WATANF; 2201WATANF Pass-through Entity Name: None Pass-through Award/Contract Number: None Applicable Compliance Component: Activities Allowed or Unallowed Allowable Costs / Cost Principles Known Questioned Cost Amount: $67,699,429 Background The Department of Social and Health Services (DSHS), Community Services Office, administers the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) grant that provides temporary cash assistance for families in need. To receive TANF benefits, participants must be engaged in activities listed in the Individual Responsibility Plan through the WorkFirst program, unless the TANF benefits are received only on behalf of a child. TANF grant funds are also used to pay clients? child care costs to meet one of the program?s primary purposes of helping clients obtain employment. Washington has established the Working Connections Child Care (WCCC) program to help eligible working families pay for child care. Both the Department of Children, Youth, and Families (Department) and DSHS administer the program. The Department is responsible for establishing policies and procedures for licensing child care providers and paying them for allowable child care services. DSHS determines TANF client eligibility and reimburses the Department for child care payments under an agreement between the two agencies. The Department uses its Social Service Payment System (SSPS) to process the payments it makes to child care providers. The system allocates payments to various funding sources, based on the eligibility of the client. These funding sources include multiple federal programs, multiple Child Care Development Fund (CCDF) federal grant awards, and state funding. The Department uploads the payment data into the state?s accounting system at a summary level based on the various funding sources. DSHS worked with the Department to setup coding in the Payment Allocating Model (PAM) system that looks at the client-level information and then assigns the correct TANF source of funds. Once source of funds is identified, that information is then sent to SSPS for allocation assignment. The Department prepares electronic reports for funds allocated to TANF funding sources and sends DSHS a monthly bill. There is always a need to transfer the funding sources for some payments throughout the year to manage federal and state funds properly. Prior to state fiscal year 2021, the Department prepared supporting documentation for transfers that included details of what payments it was transferring. The purpose of documenting this detail was to maintain proper support for federal expenditures. Some payments the Department makes for child care are funded by both the CCDF and TANF grants. While the two federal programs are separate, the requirements and policies in Washington for child care payments are consolidated under the WCCC program. Federal regulations require grant fund expenditures to be adequately supported to show that they have been used in accordance with program requirements. In fiscal year 2022, DSHS incurred $67,699,429 in child care service-related expenditures. Federal regulations require recipients to establish and follow internal controls that ensure compliance with program requirements. These controls include understanding grant requirements and monitoring the effectiveness of established controls. In the prior audit, we reported the Department did not have adequate internal controls over and did not comply with requirements to ensure payments to child care providers paid with TANF funds were allowable and properly supported. The prior finding number was 2021-028. Description of Condition The Department did not have adequate internal controls over and did not comply with requirements to ensure payments to child care providers paid with TANF funds were allowable and properly supported. In order to identify TANF-funded payments the Department made to child care providers, we requested a population of payments charged to TANF sources from SSPS. However, during the fiscal year 2021 audit, management informed us the Department had changed its grant management practices to process expenditure transfers at the grant level. This new process made the original expenditure coding in SSPS inaccurate and unreliable for testing. As a result, we could not trace the federal funds to a level of expenditure adequate to establish whether the Department spent TANF funds in accordance with federal and state regulations. As a result, we could not test the Department?s payments to child care providers for compliance with activities allowed and cost principles. We consider these internal control deficiencies to be a material weakness, which led to material noncompliance. Cause of Condition The Department is required to maintain sufficient documentation for each payment it makes with federal dollars. Management decided to modify the Department?s accounting practices in a way that now prevents it from meeting this requirement. The Department implemented what management referred to as fund-level accounting. This consisted of making significant accounting adjustments between funding sources in its general ledger without identifying the underlying transactions from SSPS that supported the adjustments. This affected all populations of child care expenditures for every month of the fiscal year. Officials from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services informed the Department that these accounting practices do not comply with federal law, but management said they believe they are compliant. Effect of Condition and Questioned Costs By not complying with federal law regarding maintaining adequate supporting documentation for expenditures, the Department created a condition that made it impossible for our Office to audit the federal dollars it used for payments to child care providers. Because we could not test transaction-level detail, we also could not determine whether the issues we identified in prior audits had improved or worsened, including the Department?s lack of adequate internal controls and significant rate of noncompliance for payments to child care providers. Because the Department did not comply with federal requirements to allow for the tracing of grant expenditures to a payment level, we are questioning all $67,699,429 in federal program costs for child care payments that DSHS incurred during the audit period. We question costs when we find an agency has not complied with grant regulations or when it does not have adequate documentation to support its expenditures. Recommendations We recommend the Department: ? Design and implement internal controls to ensure transaction-level data is sufficient to comply with federal law and state rules ? Update service level agreements with DSHS to ensure payments are sufficient and properly supported ? Consult with the grantor to discuss whether the questioned costs identified in the audit should be repaid Department?s Response The Working Connections Child Care (WCCC) program was previously managed by the Department of Social and Health Services (DSHS) and the Department of Early Learning. Since the program transitioned in 2019, the Department has been making efforts to strengthen internal controls over payments to child care providers and other grant requirements. The Department implemented grant-level management of all federal funds, including the TANF grant. The Department allocated the TANF grant to eligible clients and allowable activities in compliance with 45 CFR 98.67. For the fiscal year 2021 program audit, the State Auditor?s Office (SAO) issued a finding with $32 questioned costs for non-compliance with the CCDF eligibility requirement. No other findings, management letters, or exit items were reported in this compliance area or the cost allocation of funds based on eligibility for the CCDF or TANF grants. Given that eligibility or cost allocation has not been an area of concern, and transfers were processed between TANF and CCDF source of funds with the same eligibility criteria, the Department is assured that TANF funding was spent appropriately within federal regulations. In the Cause of Condition, the SAO stated, ?HHS officials informed the Department that these accounting practices do not comply with federal law, but management said they believe they are compliant.? The Department does not agree with this interpretation of the meeting outcome. During this informal meeting, on February 23, 2022, the State Auditor?s Office, Office of Financial Management, and the Department met with HHS and they stated they would not offer an opinion until they received the completed finding from the state. As part of the audit resolution process, HHS Administration for Children and Families?, which oversees the TANF and CCDF programs at the federal level, reviews all SAO findings and issues management decision letters. The letters will reflect the grantor?s determination of whether an audit finding is sustained, the reasons for the decision, and the required actions by the auditee. When a management decision is issued for the fiscal year 2022 finding, the Department will work with HHS and follow the audit resolution process. The Department is committed to improving internal controls. The Department does not currently have the resources to develop and maintain the business process redesign, as well as the information technology initiatives necessary to meet the level of assurance recommended by SAO. In response to prior year?s audit recommendations, the Department has submitted a budget request to the Legislature in the 2023-2025 biennial budget for additional resources to process adjustments to include transaction-level data. Auditor?s Remarks The level of assurance needed to support grant expenditures is not established by our Office, but in titles 2 and 45 of the Code of Federal Regulations and the State?s grant award. We appreciate the Department?s commitment to resolving these matters and will review the status of the Department?s corrective action during our next audit. Applicable Laws and Regulations Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), section 516, Audit findings, establishes reporting requirements for audit findings. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Guidance, section 303, Internal controls, describes the requirements for auditees to maintain internal controls over federal programs and comply with federal program requirements. Title 2 CFR Part 200.1, Uniform Guidance establishes definitions for improper payments. Part 200.53 defines improper payments. Part 200.403 establishes factors affecting allowability of costs. Part 200.410 establishes requirements for the collection of unallowable costs. The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants defines significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in its Codification of Statements on Auditing Standards, section 935, Compliance Audits, paragraph 11.
U.S. Department of Agriculture Passed through Michigan Department of Education Child Nutrition Cluster ? COVID-19 School Breakfast Program #10.553, National School Lunch Program #10.555, Summer Food Service Program for Children #10.559 #2022-002: Material Weakness in Controls over Compliance: Administrative Requirements of Uniform Guidance ? Administrative Policies This is a repeat of prior year finding #2021-002 Conditions and Criteria: Written policies associated with financial management, allowable costs, cash management and procurement do not meet the administrative requirements of Uniform Guidance (2 CFR 200). Cause/Context: Grand Rapids Christian Schools has written policies and procedures contained within the Schools? Policy Manual and the Accounting Procedures Manual that apply to the operations and administration of the Schools. Certain of these policies and procedures cover activities relevant to the federal awards programs and address some of the direct and material compliance matters important to the major federal program. However, the Schools has not adopted the policy requirements of Uniform Guidance related to financial management, allowable costs, cash management and procurement that apply to its federal programs. Recommendations: Grand Rapids Christian Schools should adopt the following written policies as required by Uniform Guidance: ?Financial Management (2 CFR 200.302) The financial management policy should include records documenting compliance, and the tracking of funds to determine that expenditures are in accordance with the terms and conditions of the federal awards. The financial management and reporting system must provide the following: ?Identification - Title of the award, federal assistance number ?Complete disclosure of accurate and current financial results of each federal award ?Source and application of funds for federal award activity ?Record retention and access ? define the time period for which records must be kept (can vary by grant agreement), and who has the ability to access the records (?200.333 - ?200.337) ?Written procedure to implement cash management requirements (see below) ?Written procedures for determining the allowability of costs (see below) ?Cash Management (2 CFR 200.305) A written policy is required by Uniform Guidance detailing the Schools? procedures to minimize the time that elapses between draw and expenditure of federal dollars. ?Allowable Costs (2 CFR 200.302(b)(7)) The Schools must have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with Subpart E - Cost Principles of Uniform Guidance and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. This includes the determination of allowable costs and the review of this determination. The standard assumes policies and procedures are in place for disbursements, and the allowable cost policy will demonstrate how the School ensures compliance. The criteria for costs to be considered allowable are documented within 2 CFR 200.403. ?Procurement Standards (2 CFR 200.317 ? 200.326) The School must have and use documented procurement procedures, including written standards that promote full and open vendor competition. Written conflict of interest standards must cover the actions of employees engaged in the selection, award and administration of contracts. Methods included in written standards covering the acquisition of property or services under a Federal award or sub-award must be consistent with specific thresholds as set forth in CFR 200.320. There are five allowable procurement methods described in ?200.320, depending upon the dollar value of the purchase or contract. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: ?Grand Rapids Christian Schools follows procurement and record retention standards provided by the USDA. ?GRCS does not have actual written policies and procedures for Financial Management, Cash Management, Allowable Costs, and Procurement Standards, but do have practices in place to follow USDA guidelines. In the case of cash management, the only location that takes cash is GRCHS. In that instance, along with Meal Magic, cash registers are zeroed out and balanced to Meal Magic and cash deposits are made daily. ?GRCS Business Office will work with the Food Service Director to begin formulating written policies and procedures specific to Grand Rapids Christian Schools. GRCS will utilize the resources from Uniform Guidance and the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) to develop policies that are compliant with those requirements prior to June 30, 2023.
U.S. Department of Agriculture Passed through Michigan Department of Education Child Nutrition Cluster ? COVID-19 School Breakfast Program #10.553, National School Lunch Program #10.555, Summer Food Service Program for Children #10.559 #2022-002: Material Weakness in Controls over Compliance: Administrative Requirements of Uniform Guidance ? Administrative Policies This is a repeat of prior year finding #2021-002 Conditions and Criteria: Written policies associated with financial management, allowable costs, cash management and procurement do not meet the administrative requirements of Uniform Guidance (2 CFR 200). Cause/Context: Grand Rapids Christian Schools has written policies and procedures contained within the Schools? Policy Manual and the Accounting Procedures Manual that apply to the operations and administration of the Schools. Certain of these policies and procedures cover activities relevant to the federal awards programs and address some of the direct and material compliance matters important to the major federal program. However, the Schools has not adopted the policy requirements of Uniform Guidance related to financial management, allowable costs, cash management and procurement that apply to its federal programs. Recommendations: Grand Rapids Christian Schools should adopt the following written policies as required by Uniform Guidance: ?Financial Management (2 CFR 200.302) The financial management policy should include records documenting compliance, and the tracking of funds to determine that expenditures are in accordance with the terms and conditions of the federal awards. The financial management and reporting system must provide the following: ?Identification - Title of the award, federal assistance number ?Complete disclosure of accurate and current financial results of each federal award ?Source and application of funds for federal award activity ?Record retention and access ? define the time period for which records must be kept (can vary by grant agreement), and who has the ability to access the records (?200.333 - ?200.337) ?Written procedure to implement cash management requirements (see below) ?Written procedures for determining the allowability of costs (see below) ?Cash Management (2 CFR 200.305) A written policy is required by Uniform Guidance detailing the Schools? procedures to minimize the time that elapses between draw and expenditure of federal dollars. ?Allowable Costs (2 CFR 200.302(b)(7)) The Schools must have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with Subpart E - Cost Principles of Uniform Guidance and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. This includes the determination of allowable costs and the review of this determination. The standard assumes policies and procedures are in place for disbursements, and the allowable cost policy will demonstrate how the School ensures compliance. The criteria for costs to be considered allowable are documented within 2 CFR 200.403. ?Procurement Standards (2 CFR 200.317 ? 200.326) The School must have and use documented procurement procedures, including written standards that promote full and open vendor competition. Written conflict of interest standards must cover the actions of employees engaged in the selection, award and administration of contracts. Methods included in written standards covering the acquisition of property or services under a Federal award or sub-award must be consistent with specific thresholds as set forth in CFR 200.320. There are five allowable procurement methods described in ?200.320, depending upon the dollar value of the purchase or contract. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: ?Grand Rapids Christian Schools follows procurement and record retention standards provided by the USDA. ?GRCS does not have actual written policies and procedures for Financial Management, Cash Management, Allowable Costs, and Procurement Standards, but do have practices in place to follow USDA guidelines. In the case of cash management, the only location that takes cash is GRCHS. In that instance, along with Meal Magic, cash registers are zeroed out and balanced to Meal Magic and cash deposits are made daily. ?GRCS Business Office will work with the Food Service Director to begin formulating written policies and procedures specific to Grand Rapids Christian Schools. GRCS will utilize the resources from Uniform Guidance and the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) to develop policies that are compliant with those requirements prior to June 30, 2023.
U.S. Department of Agriculture Passed through Michigan Department of Education Child Nutrition Cluster ? COVID-19 School Breakfast Program #10.553, National School Lunch Program #10.555, Summer Food Service Program for Children #10.559 #2022-002: Material Weakness in Controls over Compliance: Administrative Requirements of Uniform Guidance ? Administrative Policies This is a repeat of prior year finding #2021-002 Conditions and Criteria: Written policies associated with financial management, allowable costs, cash management and procurement do not meet the administrative requirements of Uniform Guidance (2 CFR 200). Cause/Context: Grand Rapids Christian Schools has written policies and procedures contained within the Schools? Policy Manual and the Accounting Procedures Manual that apply to the operations and administration of the Schools. Certain of these policies and procedures cover activities relevant to the federal awards programs and address some of the direct and material compliance matters important to the major federal program. However, the Schools has not adopted the policy requirements of Uniform Guidance related to financial management, allowable costs, cash management and procurement that apply to its federal programs. Recommendations: Grand Rapids Christian Schools should adopt the following written policies as required by Uniform Guidance: ?Financial Management (2 CFR 200.302) The financial management policy should include records documenting compliance, and the tracking of funds to determine that expenditures are in accordance with the terms and conditions of the federal awards. The financial management and reporting system must provide the following: ?Identification - Title of the award, federal assistance number ?Complete disclosure of accurate and current financial results of each federal award ?Source and application of funds for federal award activity ?Record retention and access ? define the time period for which records must be kept (can vary by grant agreement), and who has the ability to access the records (?200.333 - ?200.337) ?Written procedure to implement cash management requirements (see below) ?Written procedures for determining the allowability of costs (see below) ?Cash Management (2 CFR 200.305) A written policy is required by Uniform Guidance detailing the Schools? procedures to minimize the time that elapses between draw and expenditure of federal dollars. ?Allowable Costs (2 CFR 200.302(b)(7)) The Schools must have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with Subpart E - Cost Principles of Uniform Guidance and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. This includes the determination of allowable costs and the review of this determination. The standard assumes policies and procedures are in place for disbursements, and the allowable cost policy will demonstrate how the School ensures compliance. The criteria for costs to be considered allowable are documented within 2 CFR 200.403. ?Procurement Standards (2 CFR 200.317 ? 200.326) The School must have and use documented procurement procedures, including written standards that promote full and open vendor competition. Written conflict of interest standards must cover the actions of employees engaged in the selection, award and administration of contracts. Methods included in written standards covering the acquisition of property or services under a Federal award or sub-award must be consistent with specific thresholds as set forth in CFR 200.320. There are five allowable procurement methods described in ?200.320, depending upon the dollar value of the purchase or contract. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: ?Grand Rapids Christian Schools follows procurement and record retention standards provided by the USDA. ?GRCS does not have actual written policies and procedures for Financial Management, Cash Management, Allowable Costs, and Procurement Standards, but do have practices in place to follow USDA guidelines. In the case of cash management, the only location that takes cash is GRCHS. In that instance, along with Meal Magic, cash registers are zeroed out and balanced to Meal Magic and cash deposits are made daily. ?GRCS Business Office will work with the Food Service Director to begin formulating written policies and procedures specific to Grand Rapids Christian Schools. GRCS will utilize the resources from Uniform Guidance and the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) to develop policies that are compliant with those requirements prior to June 30, 2023.
U.S. Department of Agriculture Passed through Michigan Department of Education Child Nutrition Cluster ? COVID-19 School Breakfast Program #10.553, National School Lunch Program #10.555, Summer Food Service Program for Children #10.559 #2022-002: Material Weakness in Controls over Compliance: Administrative Requirements of Uniform Guidance ? Administrative Policies This is a repeat of prior year finding #2021-002 Conditions and Criteria: Written policies associated with financial management, allowable costs, cash management and procurement do not meet the administrative requirements of Uniform Guidance (2 CFR 200). Cause/Context: Grand Rapids Christian Schools has written policies and procedures contained within the Schools? Policy Manual and the Accounting Procedures Manual that apply to the operations and administration of the Schools. Certain of these policies and procedures cover activities relevant to the federal awards programs and address some of the direct and material compliance matters important to the major federal program. However, the Schools has not adopted the policy requirements of Uniform Guidance related to financial management, allowable costs, cash management and procurement that apply to its federal programs. Recommendations: Grand Rapids Christian Schools should adopt the following written policies as required by Uniform Guidance: ?Financial Management (2 CFR 200.302) The financial management policy should include records documenting compliance, and the tracking of funds to determine that expenditures are in accordance with the terms and conditions of the federal awards. The financial management and reporting system must provide the following: ?Identification - Title of the award, federal assistance number ?Complete disclosure of accurate and current financial results of each federal award ?Source and application of funds for federal award activity ?Record retention and access ? define the time period for which records must be kept (can vary by grant agreement), and who has the ability to access the records (?200.333 - ?200.337) ?Written procedure to implement cash management requirements (see below) ?Written procedures for determining the allowability of costs (see below) ?Cash Management (2 CFR 200.305) A written policy is required by Uniform Guidance detailing the Schools? procedures to minimize the time that elapses between draw and expenditure of federal dollars. ?Allowable Costs (2 CFR 200.302(b)(7)) The Schools must have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with Subpart E - Cost Principles of Uniform Guidance and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. This includes the determination of allowable costs and the review of this determination. The standard assumes policies and procedures are in place for disbursements, and the allowable cost policy will demonstrate how the School ensures compliance. The criteria for costs to be considered allowable are documented within 2 CFR 200.403. ?Procurement Standards (2 CFR 200.317 ? 200.326) The School must have and use documented procurement procedures, including written standards that promote full and open vendor competition. Written conflict of interest standards must cover the actions of employees engaged in the selection, award and administration of contracts. Methods included in written standards covering the acquisition of property or services under a Federal award or sub-award must be consistent with specific thresholds as set forth in CFR 200.320. There are five allowable procurement methods described in ?200.320, depending upon the dollar value of the purchase or contract. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: ?Grand Rapids Christian Schools follows procurement and record retention standards provided by the USDA. ?GRCS does not have actual written policies and procedures for Financial Management, Cash Management, Allowable Costs, and Procurement Standards, but do have practices in place to follow USDA guidelines. In the case of cash management, the only location that takes cash is GRCHS. In that instance, along with Meal Magic, cash registers are zeroed out and balanced to Meal Magic and cash deposits are made daily. ?GRCS Business Office will work with the Food Service Director to begin formulating written policies and procedures specific to Grand Rapids Christian Schools. GRCS will utilize the resources from Uniform Guidance and the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) to develop policies that are compliant with those requirements prior to June 30, 2023.
U.S. Department of Agriculture Passed through Michigan Department of Education Child Nutrition Cluster ? COVID-19 School Breakfast Program #10.553, National School Lunch Program #10.555, Summer Food Service Program for Children #10.559 #2022-002: Material Weakness in Controls over Compliance: Administrative Requirements of Uniform Guidance ? Administrative Policies This is a repeat of prior year finding #2021-002 Conditions and Criteria: Written policies associated with financial management, allowable costs, cash management and procurement do not meet the administrative requirements of Uniform Guidance (2 CFR 200). Cause/Context: Grand Rapids Christian Schools has written policies and procedures contained within the Schools? Policy Manual and the Accounting Procedures Manual that apply to the operations and administration of the Schools. Certain of these policies and procedures cover activities relevant to the federal awards programs and address some of the direct and material compliance matters important to the major federal program. However, the Schools has not adopted the policy requirements of Uniform Guidance related to financial management, allowable costs, cash management and procurement that apply to its federal programs. Recommendations: Grand Rapids Christian Schools should adopt the following written policies as required by Uniform Guidance: ?Financial Management (2 CFR 200.302) The financial management policy should include records documenting compliance, and the tracking of funds to determine that expenditures are in accordance with the terms and conditions of the federal awards. The financial management and reporting system must provide the following: ?Identification - Title of the award, federal assistance number ?Complete disclosure of accurate and current financial results of each federal award ?Source and application of funds for federal award activity ?Record retention and access ? define the time period for which records must be kept (can vary by grant agreement), and who has the ability to access the records (?200.333 - ?200.337) ?Written procedure to implement cash management requirements (see below) ?Written procedures for determining the allowability of costs (see below) ?Cash Management (2 CFR 200.305) A written policy is required by Uniform Guidance detailing the Schools? procedures to minimize the time that elapses between draw and expenditure of federal dollars. ?Allowable Costs (2 CFR 200.302(b)(7)) The Schools must have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with Subpart E - Cost Principles of Uniform Guidance and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. This includes the determination of allowable costs and the review of this determination. The standard assumes policies and procedures are in place for disbursements, and the allowable cost policy will demonstrate how the School ensures compliance. The criteria for costs to be considered allowable are documented within 2 CFR 200.403. ?Procurement Standards (2 CFR 200.317 ? 200.326) The School must have and use documented procurement procedures, including written standards that promote full and open vendor competition. Written conflict of interest standards must cover the actions of employees engaged in the selection, award and administration of contracts. Methods included in written standards covering the acquisition of property or services under a Federal award or sub-award must be consistent with specific thresholds as set forth in CFR 200.320. There are five allowable procurement methods described in ?200.320, depending upon the dollar value of the purchase or contract. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: ?Grand Rapids Christian Schools follows procurement and record retention standards provided by the USDA. ?GRCS does not have actual written policies and procedures for Financial Management, Cash Management, Allowable Costs, and Procurement Standards, but do have practices in place to follow USDA guidelines. In the case of cash management, the only location that takes cash is GRCHS. In that instance, along with Meal Magic, cash registers are zeroed out and balanced to Meal Magic and cash deposits are made daily. ?GRCS Business Office will work with the Food Service Director to begin formulating written policies and procedures specific to Grand Rapids Christian Schools. GRCS will utilize the resources from Uniform Guidance and the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) to develop policies that are compliant with those requirements prior to June 30, 2023.
U.S. Department of Agriculture Passed through Michigan Department of Education Child Nutrition Cluster ? COVID-19 School Breakfast Program #10.553, National School Lunch Program #10.555, Summer Food Service Program for Children #10.559 #2022-002: Material Weakness in Controls over Compliance: Administrative Requirements of Uniform Guidance ? Administrative Policies This is a repeat of prior year finding #2021-002 Conditions and Criteria: Written policies associated with financial management, allowable costs, cash management and procurement do not meet the administrative requirements of Uniform Guidance (2 CFR 200). Cause/Context: Grand Rapids Christian Schools has written policies and procedures contained within the Schools? Policy Manual and the Accounting Procedures Manual that apply to the operations and administration of the Schools. Certain of these policies and procedures cover activities relevant to the federal awards programs and address some of the direct and material compliance matters important to the major federal program. However, the Schools has not adopted the policy requirements of Uniform Guidance related to financial management, allowable costs, cash management and procurement that apply to its federal programs. Recommendations: Grand Rapids Christian Schools should adopt the following written policies as required by Uniform Guidance: ?Financial Management (2 CFR 200.302) The financial management policy should include records documenting compliance, and the tracking of funds to determine that expenditures are in accordance with the terms and conditions of the federal awards. The financial management and reporting system must provide the following: ?Identification - Title of the award, federal assistance number ?Complete disclosure of accurate and current financial results of each federal award ?Source and application of funds for federal award activity ?Record retention and access ? define the time period for which records must be kept (can vary by grant agreement), and who has the ability to access the records (?200.333 - ?200.337) ?Written procedure to implement cash management requirements (see below) ?Written procedures for determining the allowability of costs (see below) ?Cash Management (2 CFR 200.305) A written policy is required by Uniform Guidance detailing the Schools? procedures to minimize the time that elapses between draw and expenditure of federal dollars. ?Allowable Costs (2 CFR 200.302(b)(7)) The Schools must have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with Subpart E - Cost Principles of Uniform Guidance and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. This includes the determination of allowable costs and the review of this determination. The standard assumes policies and procedures are in place for disbursements, and the allowable cost policy will demonstrate how the School ensures compliance. The criteria for costs to be considered allowable are documented within 2 CFR 200.403. ?Procurement Standards (2 CFR 200.317 ? 200.326) The School must have and use documented procurement procedures, including written standards that promote full and open vendor competition. Written conflict of interest standards must cover the actions of employees engaged in the selection, award and administration of contracts. Methods included in written standards covering the acquisition of property or services under a Federal award or sub-award must be consistent with specific thresholds as set forth in CFR 200.320. There are five allowable procurement methods described in ?200.320, depending upon the dollar value of the purchase or contract. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: ?Grand Rapids Christian Schools follows procurement and record retention standards provided by the USDA. ?GRCS does not have actual written policies and procedures for Financial Management, Cash Management, Allowable Costs, and Procurement Standards, but do have practices in place to follow USDA guidelines. In the case of cash management, the only location that takes cash is GRCHS. In that instance, along with Meal Magic, cash registers are zeroed out and balanced to Meal Magic and cash deposits are made daily. ?GRCS Business Office will work with the Food Service Director to begin formulating written policies and procedures specific to Grand Rapids Christian Schools. GRCS will utilize the resources from Uniform Guidance and the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) to develop policies that are compliant with those requirements prior to June 30, 2023.
U.S. Department of Agriculture Passed through Michigan Department of Education Child Nutrition Cluster ? COVID-19 School Breakfast Program #10.553, National School Lunch Program #10.555, Summer Food Service Program for Children #10.559 #2022-002: Material Weakness in Controls over Compliance: Administrative Requirements of Uniform Guidance ? Administrative Policies This is a repeat of prior year finding #2021-002 Conditions and Criteria: Written policies associated with financial management, allowable costs, cash management and procurement do not meet the administrative requirements of Uniform Guidance (2 CFR 200). Cause/Context: Grand Rapids Christian Schools has written policies and procedures contained within the Schools? Policy Manual and the Accounting Procedures Manual that apply to the operations and administration of the Schools. Certain of these policies and procedures cover activities relevant to the federal awards programs and address some of the direct and material compliance matters important to the major federal program. However, the Schools has not adopted the policy requirements of Uniform Guidance related to financial management, allowable costs, cash management and procurement that apply to its federal programs. Recommendations: Grand Rapids Christian Schools should adopt the following written policies as required by Uniform Guidance: ?Financial Management (2 CFR 200.302) The financial management policy should include records documenting compliance, and the tracking of funds to determine that expenditures are in accordance with the terms and conditions of the federal awards. The financial management and reporting system must provide the following: ?Identification - Title of the award, federal assistance number ?Complete disclosure of accurate and current financial results of each federal award ?Source and application of funds for federal award activity ?Record retention and access ? define the time period for which records must be kept (can vary by grant agreement), and who has the ability to access the records (?200.333 - ?200.337) ?Written procedure to implement cash management requirements (see below) ?Written procedures for determining the allowability of costs (see below) ?Cash Management (2 CFR 200.305) A written policy is required by Uniform Guidance detailing the Schools? procedures to minimize the time that elapses between draw and expenditure of federal dollars. ?Allowable Costs (2 CFR 200.302(b)(7)) The Schools must have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with Subpart E - Cost Principles of Uniform Guidance and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. This includes the determination of allowable costs and the review of this determination. The standard assumes policies and procedures are in place for disbursements, and the allowable cost policy will demonstrate how the School ensures compliance. The criteria for costs to be considered allowable are documented within 2 CFR 200.403. ?Procurement Standards (2 CFR 200.317 ? 200.326) The School must have and use documented procurement procedures, including written standards that promote full and open vendor competition. Written conflict of interest standards must cover the actions of employees engaged in the selection, award and administration of contracts. Methods included in written standards covering the acquisition of property or services under a Federal award or sub-award must be consistent with specific thresholds as set forth in CFR 200.320. There are five allowable procurement methods described in ?200.320, depending upon the dollar value of the purchase or contract. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: ?Grand Rapids Christian Schools follows procurement and record retention standards provided by the USDA. ?GRCS does not have actual written policies and procedures for Financial Management, Cash Management, Allowable Costs, and Procurement Standards, but do have practices in place to follow USDA guidelines. In the case of cash management, the only location that takes cash is GRCHS. In that instance, along with Meal Magic, cash registers are zeroed out and balanced to Meal Magic and cash deposits are made daily. ?GRCS Business Office will work with the Food Service Director to begin formulating written policies and procedures specific to Grand Rapids Christian Schools. GRCS will utilize the resources from Uniform Guidance and the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) to develop policies that are compliant with those requirements prior to June 30, 2023.
FINDING 2022-003 Subject: Special Education Cluster - Earmarking Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.173 Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Numbers): 19611-042-PN01, 20611-042-PN01, 21611-042-PN01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking Audit Finding: Significant Deficiency Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a)Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurancethat the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes,regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be incompliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by theComptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by theCommittee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)...." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: ? (g) Be adequately documented.... " 2 CFR 200.208(b) states in part: "The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may adjust specific Federal award conditions as needed . . ." 511 IAC 7-34-7(b) states: "The public agency, in providing special education and related services to students in nonpublic schools must expend at least an amount that is the same proportion of the public agency total subgrant under 20 U.S.C. 1411(f) as the number of nonpublic school students with disabilities, who are enrolled by their parents in nonpublic schools within its boundaries, is to the total number of students with disabilities of the same age range." Condition: The School Corporation is a member of the Northeast Indiana Special Education Cooperative (Cooperative). The School Corporation did not have adequate internal controls in place to ensure that the Cooperative complied with the earmarking requirements. Cause: The School Corporation's management had not developed an effective system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the earmarking requirements of the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system, as well as adequately document costs of federal awards, prevented the determination of the School Corporation's compliance with the earmarking requirements of the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: The School Corporation is a member of the Northeast Indiana Special Education Cooperative (Cooperative). During fiscal year 2021-2022, the Cooperative operated the special education programs and spent the federal money on behalf of all its members. As the grant agreements were between the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE) and each member school, the School Corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. However, there was inadequate oversight performed by the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. The School Corporation did not have internal controls in place to ensure that the Cooperative complied with the earmarking requirements. The Cooperative did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that the required level of expenditures for non-public students with disabilities was met for each member school. The Cooperative did not have effective internal controls to ensure non-public school expenditures were appropriately identified and reported. The Non-Public Proportionate Share expenditures for 19611-042-PN01 and 20611-042-PN01 grant awards could not be verified for the individual schools to verify the minimum amount per the grant awards was expended and properly reported to IDOE as required. The School Corporation?s minimum earmarking requirements for the 19611-042-PN01 and 20611-042-PN01 grant awards were $1,095 and $1,791, respectively. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were isolated to the 19611-042-PN01 and 20611-042- Identification of repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls, as well as appropriately document and identify federal award expenditures to ensure compliance with the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan
FINDING 2022-003 Subject: Special Education Cluster - Earmarking Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.173 Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Numbers): 19611-042-PN01, 20611-042-PN01, 21611-042-PN01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking Audit Finding: Significant Deficiency Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a)Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurancethat the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes,regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be incompliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by theComptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by theCommittee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)...." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: ? (g) Be adequately documented.... " 2 CFR 200.208(b) states in part: "The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may adjust specific Federal award conditions as needed . . ." 511 IAC 7-34-7(b) states: "The public agency, in providing special education and related services to students in nonpublic schools must expend at least an amount that is the same proportion of the public agency total subgrant under 20 U.S.C. 1411(f) as the number of nonpublic school students with disabilities, who are enrolled by their parents in nonpublic schools within its boundaries, is to the total number of students with disabilities of the same age range." Condition: The School Corporation is a member of the Northeast Indiana Special Education Cooperative (Cooperative). The School Corporation did not have adequate internal controls in place to ensure that the Cooperative complied with the earmarking requirements. Cause: The School Corporation's management had not developed an effective system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the earmarking requirements of the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system, as well as adequately document costs of federal awards, prevented the determination of the School Corporation's compliance with the earmarking requirements of the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: The School Corporation is a member of the Northeast Indiana Special Education Cooperative (Cooperative). During fiscal year 2021-2022, the Cooperative operated the special education programs and spent the federal money on behalf of all its members. As the grant agreements were between the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE) and each member school, the School Corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. However, there was inadequate oversight performed by the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. The School Corporation did not have internal controls in place to ensure that the Cooperative complied with the earmarking requirements. The Cooperative did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that the required level of expenditures for non-public students with disabilities was met for each member school. The Cooperative did not have effective internal controls to ensure non-public school expenditures were appropriately identified and reported. The Non-Public Proportionate Share expenditures for 19611-042-PN01 and 20611-042-PN01 grant awards could not be verified for the individual schools to verify the minimum amount per the grant awards was expended and properly reported to IDOE as required. The School Corporation?s minimum earmarking requirements for the 19611-042-PN01 and 20611-042-PN01 grant awards were $1,095 and $1,791, respectively. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were isolated to the 19611-042-PN01 and 20611-042- Identification of repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls, as well as appropriately document and identify federal award expenditures to ensure compliance with the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan
Finding 2022-003: Payroll Records Documentation Assistance Listing Number and Title: 59.075 Shuttered Venue Operators Grant Program Federal Agency: Small Business Administration Federal Award Number: SBAHQ21SV004136 Grant Period: 7/12/2021 through 6/30/2022 Criteria Costs charged to U.S. Federal Government programs must adequately documented (CFR 200.403 (h)). Conditions Documentation of payroll expenses were not always complete, including documentation of employee payrates, timesheets, and the distribution of costs to general ledger accounts. Cause The Organization?s procedures surrounding payroll tend to be less formal than the rules of the Uniform Guidance stipulate. Effect The risk of incurring costs not allowed by federal grants is moderate. Context The fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 was the first year the Organization was required to have an audit conducted under the rules of the Uniform Guidance. Recommendation Payroll processing procedures should be strengthened.
FINDING 2022-003 Subject: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listings Number: 84.425 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425D200013, S425D210013, S425U210013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Findings: Significant Deficiency, Other Matters Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Activities Allowed or Unallowed and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements. The Education Stabilization Fund established by the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act and further funded by the Coronavirus Response and Relief Supplemental Appropriations Act (CRSSA) and the American Rescue Plan (ARP) Act was for the purpose of preventing, preparing for, or responding to the Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19). During fiscal year 2020-2021, 2 of 40 vendor claims tested and 4 of 13 payroll claims tested paid for supplies, services, and payroll without an explanation for how the expenditures prevented, prepared for, or responded to COVID-19. The total of unsupported expenditures for DJ services, gaming chairs, and additional payroll and stipends was $15,787. These amounts were considered questioned costs. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The Non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 2 CFR 200.404 states in part: "A cost is reasonable if, in its nature and amount, it does not exceed that which would be incurred by a prudent person under the circumstances prevailing at the time the decision was made to incur the cost. The question of reasonableness is particularly important when the non- Federal entity is predominantly federally funded. In determining reasonableness of a given cost, consideration must be given to: (a) Whether the cost is of a type generally recognized as ordinary and necessary for the operation of the non-Federal entity or the proper and efficient performance of the Federal award. . . ." Public Law 116-136, Section 18003(d) states: "USES OF FUNDS.?A local educational agency that receives funds under this title may use funds for any of the following: (1) Any activity authorized by the ESEA of 1965, including the Native Hawaiian Education Act and the Alaska Native Educational Equity, Support, and Assistance Act (20 U.S.C. 6301 et seq.), the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (20 U.S.C. 1400 et seq.) ('IDEA'), the Adult Education and Family Literacy Act (20 U.S.C. 1400 et seq.), the Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Education Act of 2006 (20 U.S.C. 2301 et seq.) ('the Perkins Act'), or subtitle B of title VII of the McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 11431 et seq.). (2) Coordination of preparedness and response efforts of local educational agencies with State, local, Tribal, and territorial public health departments, and other relevant agencies, to improve coordinated responses among such entities to prevent, prepare for, and respond to coronavirus. (3) Providing principals and others school leaders with the resources necessary to address the needs of their individual schools. (4) Activities to address the unique needs of low-income children or students, children with disabilities, English learners, racial and ethnic minorities, students experiencing homelessness, and foster care youth, including how outreach and service delivery will meet the needs of each population. (5) Developing and implementing procedures and systems to improve the preparedness and response efforts of local educational agencies. (6) Training and professional development for staff of the local educational agency on sanitation and minimizing the spread of infectious diseases. (7) Purchasing supplies to sanitize and clean the facilities of a local educational agency, including buildings operated by such agency. (8) Planning for and coordinating during long-term closures, including for how to provide meals to eligible students, how to provide technology for online learning to all students, how to provide guidance for carrying out requirements under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (20 U.S.C. 1401 et seq.) and how to ensure other educational services can continue to be provided consistent with all Federal, State, and local requirements. (9) Purchasing educational technology (including hardware, software, and connectivity) for students who are served by the local educational agency that aids in regular and substantive educational interaction between students and their classroom instructors, including low-income students and students with disabilities, which may include assistive technology or adaptive equipment. (10) Providing mental health services and supports. (11) Planning and implementing activities related to summer learning and supplemental afterschool programs, including providing classroom instruction or online learning during the summer months and addressing the needs of low-income students, students with disabilities, English learners, migrant students, students experiencing homelessness, and children in foster care. (12) Other activities that are necessary to maintain the operation of and continuity of services in local educational H. R. 748?287 agencies and continuing to employ existing staff of the local educational agency." Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021, P.L. 116-260, section 313(d) states: "USES OF FUNDS.?A local educational agency that receives funds under this section may use the funds for any of the following: (1) Any activity authorized by the ESEA of 1965, including the Native Hawaiian Education Act and the Alaska Native Educational Equity, Support, and Assistance Act (20 U.S.C. 6301 et seq.), the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (20 U.S.C. 1400 et seq.) ('IDEA'), the Adult Education and Family Literacy Act (20 U.S.C. 1400 et seq.), the Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Education Act of 2006 (20 U.S.C. 2301 et seq.) ('the Perkins Act'), or subtitle B of title VII of the McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 11431 et seq.). (2) Coordination of preparedness and response efforts of local educational agencies with State, local, Tribal, and territorial public health departments, and other relevant agencies, to improve coordinated responses among such entities to prevent, prepare for, and respond to coronavirus. (3) Providing principals and others school leaders with the resources necessary to address the needs of their individual schools. (4) Activities to address the unique needs of low-income children or students, children with disabilities, English learners, racial and ethnic minorities, students experiencing homelessness, and foster care youth, including how outreach and service delivery will meet the needs of each population. (5) Developing and implementing procedures and systems to improve the preparedness and response efforts of local educational agencies. (6) Training and professional development for staff of the local educational agency on sanitation and minimizing the spread of infectious diseases. (7) Purchasing supplies to sanitize and clean the facilities of a local educational agency, including buildings operated by such agency. (8) Planning for, coordinating, and implementing activities during long-term closures, including providing meals to eligible students, providing technology for online learning to all students, providing guidance for carrying out requirements under the IDEA and ensuring other educational services can continue to be provided consistent with all Federal, State, and local requirements. (9) Purchasing educational technology (including hardware, software, and connectivity) for students who are served by the local educational agency that aids in regular and substantive educational interaction between students and their classroom instructors, including low-income students and children with disabilities, which may include assistive technology or adaptive equipment. (10) Providing mental health services and supports. (11) Planning and implementing activities related to summer learning and supplemental afterschool programs, including providing classroom instruction or online learning during the summer months and addressing the needs of low-income students, children with disabilities, English learners, migrant students, students experiencing homelessness, and children in foster care. (12) Addressing learning loss among students, including low-income students, children with disabilities, English learners, racial and ethnic minorities, students experiencing homelessness, and children and youth in foster care, of the local educational agency, including by? (A) Administering and using high-quality assessments that are valid and reliable, to accurately assess students? academic progress and assist educators in meeting students? academic needs, including through differentiating instruction. (B) Implementing evidence-based activities to meet the comprehensive needs of students. (C) Providing information and assistance to parents and families on how they can effectively support students, including in a distance learning environment. (D) Tracking student attendance and improving student engagement in distance education. (13) School facility repairs and improvements to enable operation of schools to reduce risk of virus transmission and exposure to environmental health hazards, and to support student health needs. (14) Inspection, testing, maintenance, repair, replacement, and upgrade projects to improve the indoor air quality in school facilities, including mechanical and non-mechanical heating, ventilation, and air conditioning systems, filtering, purification and other air cleaning, fans, control systems, and window and door repair and replacement. (15) Other activities that are necessary to maintain the operation of and continuity of services in local educational agencies and continuing to employ existing staff of the local educational agency." American Rescue Plan Act of 2021, H.R. 1319, section 2001(e) states: "USES OF FUNDS.?A local educational agency that receives funds under this section? (1) shall reserve not less than 20 percent of such funds to address learning loss through the implementation of evidence-based interventions, such as summer learning or summer enrichment, extended day, comprehensive afterschool programs, or extended school year programs, and ensure that such interventions respond to students' academic, social, and emotional needs and address the disproportionate impact of the coronavirus on the student subgroups described in section 1111(b)(2)(B)(xi) of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 6311(b)(2)(B)(xi)), students experiencing homelessness, and children and youth in foster care; and (2) shall use the remaining funds for any of the following: (A) Any activity authorized by the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965. (B) Any activity authorized by the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. (C) Any activity authorized by the Adult Education and Family Literacy Act. (D) Any activity authorized by the Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Education Act of 2006. (E) Coordination of preparedness and response efforts of local educational agencies with State, local, Tribal, and territorial public health departments, and other relevant agencies, to improve coordinated responses among such entities to prevent, prepare for, and respond to coronavirus. (F) Activities to address the unique needs of low-income children or students, children with disabilities, English learners, racial and ethnic minorities, students experiencing homelessness, and foster care youth, including how outreach and service delivery will meet the needs of each population. (G) Developing and implementing procedures and systems to improve the preparedness and response efforts of local educational agencies. (H) Training and professional development for staff of the local educational agency on sanitation and minimizing the spread of infectious diseases. (I) Purchasing supplies to sanitize and clean the facilities of a local educational agency, including buildings operated by such agency. (J) Planning for, coordinating, and implementing activities during long-term closures, including providing meals to eligible students, providing technology for online learning to all students, providing guidance for carrying out requirements under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act and ensuring other educational services can H. R. 1319?18 continue to be provided consistent with all Federal, State, and local requirements. (K) Purchasing educational technology (including hardware, software, and connectivity) for students who are served by the local educational agency that aids in regular and substantive educational interaction between students and their classroom instructors, including low-income students and children with disabilities, which may include assistive technology or adaptive equipment. (L) Providing mental health services and supports, including through the implementation of evidence-based full-service community schools. (M) Planning and implementing activities related to summer learning and supplemental afterschool programs, including providing classroom instruction or online learning during the summer months and addressing the needs of low-income students, children with disabilities, English learners, migrant students, students experiencing homelessness, and children in foster care. (N) Addressing learning loss among students, including low-income students, children with disabilities, English learners, racial and ethnic minorities, students experiencing homelessness, and children and youth in foster care, of the local educational agency, including by? (i) administering and using high-quality assessments that are valid and reliable, to accurately assess students' academic progress and assist educators in meeting students' academic needs, including through differentiating instruction; (ii) implementing evidence-based activities to meet the comprehensive needs of students; (iii) providing information and assistance to parents and families on how they can effectively support students, including in a distance learning environment; and (iv) tracking student attendance and improving student engagement in distance education. (O) School facility repairs and improvements to enable operation of schools to reduce risk of virus transmission and exposure to environmental health hazards, and to support student health needs. (P) Inspection, testing, maintenance, repair, replacement, and upgrade projects to improve the indoor air quality in school facilities, including mechanical and nonmechanical heating, ventilation, and air conditioning systems, filtering, purification and other air cleaning, fans, control systems, and window and door repair and replacement. (Q) Developing strategies and implementing public health protocols including, to the greatest extent practicable, policies in line with guidance from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention for the reopening and operation of school facilities to effectively maintain the health and safety of students, educators, and other staff. H. R. 1319?19 (R) Other activities that are necessary to maintain the operation of and continuity of services in local educational agencies and continuing to employ existing staff of the local educational agency." Cause The School Corporation's management had not developed a system of internal control that would have ensured compliance, or that supporting documentation would have been maintained and made available for audit related to the Activities Allowed or Unallowed and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements. Effect The failure to retain and provide appropriate supporting documentation prevented the determination of the School Corporation's compliance with the compliance requirements listed above. Questioned Costs Known questioned costs of $15,787 were identified as noted in the Condition and Context. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish internal controls to ensure that documentation will be maintained and made available for audit related to the grant agreement and the Activities Allowed or Unallowed and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-003 Subject: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listings Number: 84.425 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425D200013, S425D210013, S425U210013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Findings: Significant Deficiency, Other Matters Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Activities Allowed or Unallowed and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements. The Education Stabilization Fund established by the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act and further funded by the Coronavirus Response and Relief Supplemental Appropriations Act (CRSSA) and the American Rescue Plan (ARP) Act was for the purpose of preventing, preparing for, or responding to the Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19). During fiscal year 2020-2021, 2 of 40 vendor claims tested and 4 of 13 payroll claims tested paid for supplies, services, and payroll without an explanation for how the expenditures prevented, prepared for, or responded to COVID-19. The total of unsupported expenditures for DJ services, gaming chairs, and additional payroll and stipends was $15,787. These amounts were considered questioned costs. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The Non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 2 CFR 200.404 states in part: "A cost is reasonable if, in its nature and amount, it does not exceed that which would be incurred by a prudent person under the circumstances prevailing at the time the decision was made to incur the cost. The question of reasonableness is particularly important when the non- Federal entity is predominantly federally funded. In determining reasonableness of a given cost, consideration must be given to: (a) Whether the cost is of a type generally recognized as ordinary and necessary for the operation of the non-Federal entity or the proper and efficient performance of the Federal award. . . ." Public Law 116-136, Section 18003(d) states: "USES OF FUNDS.?A local educational agency that receives funds under this title may use funds for any of the following: (1) Any activity authorized by the ESEA of 1965, including the Native Hawaiian Education Act and the Alaska Native Educational Equity, Support, and Assistance Act (20 U.S.C. 6301 et seq.), the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (20 U.S.C. 1400 et seq.) ('IDEA'), the Adult Education and Family Literacy Act (20 U.S.C. 1400 et seq.), the Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Education Act of 2006 (20 U.S.C. 2301 et seq.) ('the Perkins Act'), or subtitle B of title VII of the McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 11431 et seq.). (2) Coordination of preparedness and response efforts of local educational agencies with State, local, Tribal, and territorial public health departments, and other relevant agencies, to improve coordinated responses among such entities to prevent, prepare for, and respond to coronavirus. (3) Providing principals and others school leaders with the resources necessary to address the needs of their individual schools. (4) Activities to address the unique needs of low-income children or students, children with disabilities, English learners, racial and ethnic minorities, students experiencing homelessness, and foster care youth, including how outreach and service delivery will meet the needs of each population. (5) Developing and implementing procedures and systems to improve the preparedness and response efforts of local educational agencies. (6) Training and professional development for staff of the local educational agency on sanitation and minimizing the spread of infectious diseases. (7) Purchasing supplies to sanitize and clean the facilities of a local educational agency, including buildings operated by such agency. (8) Planning for and coordinating during long-term closures, including for how to provide meals to eligible students, how to provide technology for online learning to all students, how to provide guidance for carrying out requirements under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (20 U.S.C. 1401 et seq.) and how to ensure other educational services can continue to be provided consistent with all Federal, State, and local requirements. (9) Purchasing educational technology (including hardware, software, and connectivity) for students who are served by the local educational agency that aids in regular and substantive educational interaction between students and their classroom instructors, including low-income students and students with disabilities, which may include assistive technology or adaptive equipment. (10) Providing mental health services and supports. (11) Planning and implementing activities related to summer learning and supplemental afterschool programs, including providing classroom instruction or online learning during the summer months and addressing the needs of low-income students, students with disabilities, English learners, migrant students, students experiencing homelessness, and children in foster care. (12) Other activities that are necessary to maintain the operation of and continuity of services in local educational H. R. 748?287 agencies and continuing to employ existing staff of the local educational agency." Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021, P.L. 116-260, section 313(d) states: "USES OF FUNDS.?A local educational agency that receives funds under this section may use the funds for any of the following: (1) Any activity authorized by the ESEA of 1965, including the Native Hawaiian Education Act and the Alaska Native Educational Equity, Support, and Assistance Act (20 U.S.C. 6301 et seq.), the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (20 U.S.C. 1400 et seq.) ('IDEA'), the Adult Education and Family Literacy Act (20 U.S.C. 1400 et seq.), the Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Education Act of 2006 (20 U.S.C. 2301 et seq.) ('the Perkins Act'), or subtitle B of title VII of the McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 11431 et seq.). (2) Coordination of preparedness and response efforts of local educational agencies with State, local, Tribal, and territorial public health departments, and other relevant agencies, to improve coordinated responses among such entities to prevent, prepare for, and respond to coronavirus. (3) Providing principals and others school leaders with the resources necessary to address the needs of their individual schools. (4) Activities to address the unique needs of low-income children or students, children with disabilities, English learners, racial and ethnic minorities, students experiencing homelessness, and foster care youth, including how outreach and service delivery will meet the needs of each population. (5) Developing and implementing procedures and systems to improve the preparedness and response efforts of local educational agencies. (6) Training and professional development for staff of the local educational agency on sanitation and minimizing the spread of infectious diseases. (7) Purchasing supplies to sanitize and clean the facilities of a local educational agency, including buildings operated by such agency. (8) Planning for, coordinating, and implementing activities during long-term closures, including providing meals to eligible students, providing technology for online learning to all students, providing guidance for carrying out requirements under the IDEA and ensuring other educational services can continue to be provided consistent with all Federal, State, and local requirements. (9) Purchasing educational technology (including hardware, software, and connectivity) for students who are served by the local educational agency that aids in regular and substantive educational interaction between students and their classroom instructors, including low-income students and children with disabilities, which may include assistive technology or adaptive equipment. (10) Providing mental health services and supports. (11) Planning and implementing activities related to summer learning and supplemental afterschool programs, including providing classroom instruction or online learning during the summer months and addressing the needs of low-income students, children with disabilities, English learners, migrant students, students experiencing homelessness, and children in foster care. (12) Addressing learning loss among students, including low-income students, children with disabilities, English learners, racial and ethnic minorities, students experiencing homelessness, and children and youth in foster care, of the local educational agency, including by? (A) Administering and using high-quality assessments that are valid and reliable, to accurately assess students? academic progress and assist educators in meeting students? academic needs, including through differentiating instruction. (B) Implementing evidence-based activities to meet the comprehensive needs of students. (C) Providing information and assistance to parents and families on how they can effectively support students, including in a distance learning environment. (D) Tracking student attendance and improving student engagement in distance education. (13) School facility repairs and improvements to enable operation of schools to reduce risk of virus transmission and exposure to environmental health hazards, and to support student health needs. (14) Inspection, testing, maintenance, repair, replacement, and upgrade projects to improve the indoor air quality in school facilities, including mechanical and non-mechanical heating, ventilation, and air conditioning systems, filtering, purification and other air cleaning, fans, control systems, and window and door repair and replacement. (15) Other activities that are necessary to maintain the operation of and continuity of services in local educational agencies and continuing to employ existing staff of the local educational agency." American Rescue Plan Act of 2021, H.R. 1319, section 2001(e) states: "USES OF FUNDS.?A local educational agency that receives funds under this section? (1) shall reserve not less than 20 percent of such funds to address learning loss through the implementation of evidence-based interventions, such as summer learning or summer enrichment, extended day, comprehensive afterschool programs, or extended school year programs, and ensure that such interventions respond to students' academic, social, and emotional needs and address the disproportionate impact of the coronavirus on the student subgroups described in section 1111(b)(2)(B)(xi) of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 6311(b)(2)(B)(xi)), students experiencing homelessness, and children and youth in foster care; and (2) shall use the remaining funds for any of the following: (A) Any activity authorized by the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965. (B) Any activity authorized by the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. (C) Any activity authorized by the Adult Education and Family Literacy Act. (D) Any activity authorized by the Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Education Act of 2006. (E) Coordination of preparedness and response efforts of local educational agencies with State, local, Tribal, and territorial public health departments, and other relevant agencies, to improve coordinated responses among such entities to prevent, prepare for, and respond to coronavirus. (F) Activities to address the unique needs of low-income children or students, children with disabilities, English learners, racial and ethnic minorities, students experiencing homelessness, and foster care youth, including how outreach and service delivery will meet the needs of each population. (G) Developing and implementing procedures and systems to improve the preparedness and response efforts of local educational agencies. (H) Training and professional development for staff of the local educational agency on sanitation and minimizing the spread of infectious diseases. (I) Purchasing supplies to sanitize and clean the facilities of a local educational agency, including buildings operated by such agency. (J) Planning for, coordinating, and implementing activities during long-term closures, including providing meals to eligible students, providing technology for online learning to all students, providing guidance for carrying out requirements under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act and ensuring other educational services can H. R. 1319?18 continue to be provided consistent with all Federal, State, and local requirements. (K) Purchasing educational technology (including hardware, software, and connectivity) for students who are served by the local educational agency that aids in regular and substantive educational interaction between students and their classroom instructors, including low-income students and children with disabilities, which may include assistive technology or adaptive equipment. (L) Providing mental health services and supports, including through the implementation of evidence-based full-service community schools. (M) Planning and implementing activities related to summer learning and supplemental afterschool programs, including providing classroom instruction or online learning during the summer months and addressing the needs of low-income students, children with disabilities, English learners, migrant students, students experiencing homelessness, and children in foster care. (N) Addressing learning loss among students, including low-income students, children with disabilities, English learners, racial and ethnic minorities, students experiencing homelessness, and children and youth in foster care, of the local educational agency, including by? (i) administering and using high-quality assessments that are valid and reliable, to accurately assess students' academic progress and assist educators in meeting students' academic needs, including through differentiating instruction; (ii) implementing evidence-based activities to meet the comprehensive needs of students; (iii) providing information and assistance to parents and families on how they can effectively support students, including in a distance learning environment; and (iv) tracking student attendance and improving student engagement in distance education. (O) School facility repairs and improvements to enable operation of schools to reduce risk of virus transmission and exposure to environmental health hazards, and to support student health needs. (P) Inspection, testing, maintenance, repair, replacement, and upgrade projects to improve the indoor air quality in school facilities, including mechanical and nonmechanical heating, ventilation, and air conditioning systems, filtering, purification and other air cleaning, fans, control systems, and window and door repair and replacement. (Q) Developing strategies and implementing public health protocols including, to the greatest extent practicable, policies in line with guidance from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention for the reopening and operation of school facilities to effectively maintain the health and safety of students, educators, and other staff. H. R. 1319?19 (R) Other activities that are necessary to maintain the operation of and continuity of services in local educational agencies and continuing to employ existing staff of the local educational agency." Cause The School Corporation's management had not developed a system of internal control that would have ensured compliance, or that supporting documentation would have been maintained and made available for audit related to the Activities Allowed or Unallowed and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements. Effect The failure to retain and provide appropriate supporting documentation prevented the determination of the School Corporation's compliance with the compliance requirements listed above. Questioned Costs Known questioned costs of $15,787 were identified as noted in the Condition and Context. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish internal controls to ensure that documentation will be maintained and made available for audit related to the grant agreement and the Activities Allowed or Unallowed and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-003 Subject: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listings Number: 84.425 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425D200013, S425D210013, S425U210013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Findings: Significant Deficiency, Other Matters Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Activities Allowed or Unallowed and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements. The Education Stabilization Fund established by the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act and further funded by the Coronavirus Response and Relief Supplemental Appropriations Act (CRSSA) and the American Rescue Plan (ARP) Act was for the purpose of preventing, preparing for, or responding to the Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19). During fiscal year 2020-2021, 2 of 40 vendor claims tested and 4 of 13 payroll claims tested paid for supplies, services, and payroll without an explanation for how the expenditures prevented, prepared for, or responded to COVID-19. The total of unsupported expenditures for DJ services, gaming chairs, and additional payroll and stipends was $15,787. These amounts were considered questioned costs. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The Non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 2 CFR 200.404 states in part: "A cost is reasonable if, in its nature and amount, it does not exceed that which would be incurred by a prudent person under the circumstances prevailing at the time the decision was made to incur the cost. The question of reasonableness is particularly important when the non- Federal entity is predominantly federally funded. In determining reasonableness of a given cost, consideration must be given to: (a) Whether the cost is of a type generally recognized as ordinary and necessary for the operation of the non-Federal entity or the proper and efficient performance of the Federal award. . . ." Public Law 116-136, Section 18003(d) states: "USES OF FUNDS.?A local educational agency that receives funds under this title may use funds for any of the following: (1) Any activity authorized by the ESEA of 1965, including the Native Hawaiian Education Act and the Alaska Native Educational Equity, Support, and Assistance Act (20 U.S.C. 6301 et seq.), the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (20 U.S.C. 1400 et seq.) ('IDEA'), the Adult Education and Family Literacy Act (20 U.S.C. 1400 et seq.), the Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Education Act of 2006 (20 U.S.C. 2301 et seq.) ('the Perkins Act'), or subtitle B of title VII of the McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 11431 et seq.). (2) Coordination of preparedness and response efforts of local educational agencies with State, local, Tribal, and territorial public health departments, and other relevant agencies, to improve coordinated responses among such entities to prevent, prepare for, and respond to coronavirus. (3) Providing principals and others school leaders with the resources necessary to address the needs of their individual schools. (4) Activities to address the unique needs of low-income children or students, children with disabilities, English learners, racial and ethnic minorities, students experiencing homelessness, and foster care youth, including how outreach and service delivery will meet the needs of each population. (5) Developing and implementing procedures and systems to improve the preparedness and response efforts of local educational agencies. (6) Training and professional development for staff of the local educational agency on sanitation and minimizing the spread of infectious diseases. (7) Purchasing supplies to sanitize and clean the facilities of a local educational agency, including buildings operated by such agency. (8) Planning for and coordinating during long-term closures, including for how to provide meals to eligible students, how to provide technology for online learning to all students, how to provide guidance for carrying out requirements under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (20 U.S.C. 1401 et seq.) and how to ensure other educational services can continue to be provided consistent with all Federal, State, and local requirements. (9) Purchasing educational technology (including hardware, software, and connectivity) for students who are served by the local educational agency that aids in regular and substantive educational interaction between students and their classroom instructors, including low-income students and students with disabilities, which may include assistive technology or adaptive equipment. (10) Providing mental health services and supports. (11) Planning and implementing activities related to summer learning and supplemental afterschool programs, including providing classroom instruction or online learning during the summer months and addressing the needs of low-income students, students with disabilities, English learners, migrant students, students experiencing homelessness, and children in foster care. (12) Other activities that are necessary to maintain the operation of and continuity of services in local educational H. R. 748?287 agencies and continuing to employ existing staff of the local educational agency." Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021, P.L. 116-260, section 313(d) states: "USES OF FUNDS.?A local educational agency that receives funds under this section may use the funds for any of the following: (1) Any activity authorized by the ESEA of 1965, including the Native Hawaiian Education Act and the Alaska Native Educational Equity, Support, and Assistance Act (20 U.S.C. 6301 et seq.), the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (20 U.S.C. 1400 et seq.) ('IDEA'), the Adult Education and Family Literacy Act (20 U.S.C. 1400 et seq.), the Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Education Act of 2006 (20 U.S.C. 2301 et seq.) ('the Perkins Act'), or subtitle B of title VII of the McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 11431 et seq.). (2) Coordination of preparedness and response efforts of local educational agencies with State, local, Tribal, and territorial public health departments, and other relevant agencies, to improve coordinated responses among such entities to prevent, prepare for, and respond to coronavirus. (3) Providing principals and others school leaders with the resources necessary to address the needs of their individual schools. (4) Activities to address the unique needs of low-income children or students, children with disabilities, English learners, racial and ethnic minorities, students experiencing homelessness, and foster care youth, including how outreach and service delivery will meet the needs of each population. (5) Developing and implementing procedures and systems to improve the preparedness and response efforts of local educational agencies. (6) Training and professional development for staff of the local educational agency on sanitation and minimizing the spread of infectious diseases. (7) Purchasing supplies to sanitize and clean the facilities of a local educational agency, including buildings operated by such agency. (8) Planning for, coordinating, and implementing activities during long-term closures, including providing meals to eligible students, providing technology for online learning to all students, providing guidance for carrying out requirements under the IDEA and ensuring other educational services can continue to be provided consistent with all Federal, State, and local requirements. (9) Purchasing educational technology (including hardware, software, and connectivity) for students who are served by the local educational agency that aids in regular and substantive educational interaction between students and their classroom instructors, including low-income students and children with disabilities, which may include assistive technology or adaptive equipment. (10) Providing mental health services and supports. (11) Planning and implementing activities related to summer learning and supplemental afterschool programs, including providing classroom instruction or online learning during the summer months and addressing the needs of low-income students, children with disabilities, English learners, migrant students, students experiencing homelessness, and children in foster care. (12) Addressing learning loss among students, including low-income students, children with disabilities, English learners, racial and ethnic minorities, students experiencing homelessness, and children and youth in foster care, of the local educational agency, including by? (A) Administering and using high-quality assessments that are valid and reliable, to accurately assess students? academic progress and assist educators in meeting students? academic needs, including through differentiating instruction. (B) Implementing evidence-based activities to meet the comprehensive needs of students. (C) Providing information and assistance to parents and families on how they can effectively support students, including in a distance learning environment. (D) Tracking student attendance and improving student engagement in distance education. (13) School facility repairs and improvements to enable operation of schools to reduce risk of virus transmission and exposure to environmental health hazards, and to support student health needs. (14) Inspection, testing, maintenance, repair, replacement, and upgrade projects to improve the indoor air quality in school facilities, including mechanical and non-mechanical heating, ventilation, and air conditioning systems, filtering, purification and other air cleaning, fans, control systems, and window and door repair and replacement. (15) Other activities that are necessary to maintain the operation of and continuity of services in local educational agencies and continuing to employ existing staff of the local educational agency." American Rescue Plan Act of 2021, H.R. 1319, section 2001(e) states: "USES OF FUNDS.?A local educational agency that receives funds under this section? (1) shall reserve not less than 20 percent of such funds to address learning loss through the implementation of evidence-based interventions, such as summer learning or summer enrichment, extended day, comprehensive afterschool programs, or extended school year programs, and ensure that such interventions respond to students' academic, social, and emotional needs and address the disproportionate impact of the coronavirus on the student subgroups described in section 1111(b)(2)(B)(xi) of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 6311(b)(2)(B)(xi)), students experiencing homelessness, and children and youth in foster care; and (2) shall use the remaining funds for any of the following: (A) Any activity authorized by the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965. (B) Any activity authorized by the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. (C) Any activity authorized by the Adult Education and Family Literacy Act. (D) Any activity authorized by the Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Education Act of 2006. (E) Coordination of preparedness and response efforts of local educational agencies with State, local, Tribal, and territorial public health departments, and other relevant agencies, to improve coordinated responses among such entities to prevent, prepare for, and respond to coronavirus. (F) Activities to address the unique needs of low-income children or students, children with disabilities, English learners, racial and ethnic minorities, students experiencing homelessness, and foster care youth, including how outreach and service delivery will meet the needs of each population. (G) Developing and implementing procedures and systems to improve the preparedness and response efforts of local educational agencies. (H) Training and professional development for staff of the local educational agency on sanitation and minimizing the spread of infectious diseases. (I) Purchasing supplies to sanitize and clean the facilities of a local educational agency, including buildings operated by such agency. (J) Planning for, coordinating, and implementing activities during long-term closures, including providing meals to eligible students, providing technology for online learning to all students, providing guidance for carrying out requirements under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act and ensuring other educational services can H. R. 1319?18 continue to be provided consistent with all Federal, State, and local requirements. (K) Purchasing educational technology (including hardware, software, and connectivity) for students who are served by the local educational agency that aids in regular and substantive educational interaction between students and their classroom instructors, including low-income students and children with disabilities, which may include assistive technology or adaptive equipment. (L) Providing mental health services and supports, including through the implementation of evidence-based full-service community schools. (M) Planning and implementing activities related to summer learning and supplemental afterschool programs, including providing classroom instruction or online learning during the summer months and addressing the needs of low-income students, children with disabilities, English learners, migrant students, students experiencing homelessness, and children in foster care. (N) Addressing learning loss among students, including low-income students, children with disabilities, English learners, racial and ethnic minorities, students experiencing homelessness, and children and youth in foster care, of the local educational agency, including by? (i) administering and using high-quality assessments that are valid and reliable, to accurately assess students' academic progress and assist educators in meeting students' academic needs, including through differentiating instruction; (ii) implementing evidence-based activities to meet the comprehensive needs of students; (iii) providing information and assistance to parents and families on how they can effectively support students, including in a distance learning environment; and (iv) tracking student attendance and improving student engagement in distance education. (O) School facility repairs and improvements to enable operation of schools to reduce risk of virus transmission and exposure to environmental health hazards, and to support student health needs. (P) Inspection, testing, maintenance, repair, replacement, and upgrade projects to improve the indoor air quality in school facilities, including mechanical and nonmechanical heating, ventilation, and air conditioning systems, filtering, purification and other air cleaning, fans, control systems, and window and door repair and replacement. (Q) Developing strategies and implementing public health protocols including, to the greatest extent practicable, policies in line with guidance from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention for the reopening and operation of school facilities to effectively maintain the health and safety of students, educators, and other staff. H. R. 1319?19 (R) Other activities that are necessary to maintain the operation of and continuity of services in local educational agencies and continuing to employ existing staff of the local educational agency." Cause The School Corporation's management had not developed a system of internal control that would have ensured compliance, or that supporting documentation would have been maintained and made available for audit related to the Activities Allowed or Unallowed and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements. Effect The failure to retain and provide appropriate supporting documentation prevented the determination of the School Corporation's compliance with the compliance requirements listed above. Questioned Costs Known questioned costs of $15,787 were identified as noted in the Condition and Context. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish internal controls to ensure that documentation will be maintained and made available for audit related to the grant agreement and the Activities Allowed or Unallowed and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-003 Subject: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listings Number: 84.425 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425D200013, S425D210013, S425U210013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Findings: Significant Deficiency, Other Matters Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Activities Allowed or Unallowed and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements. The Education Stabilization Fund established by the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act and further funded by the Coronavirus Response and Relief Supplemental Appropriations Act (CRSSA) and the American Rescue Plan (ARP) Act was for the purpose of preventing, preparing for, or responding to the Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19). During fiscal year 2020-2021, 2 of 40 vendor claims tested and 4 of 13 payroll claims tested paid for supplies, services, and payroll without an explanation for how the expenditures prevented, prepared for, or responded to COVID-19. The total of unsupported expenditures for DJ services, gaming chairs, and additional payroll and stipends was $15,787. These amounts were considered questioned costs. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The Non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 2 CFR 200.404 states in part: "A cost is reasonable if, in its nature and amount, it does not exceed that which would be incurred by a prudent person under the circumstances prevailing at the time the decision was made to incur the cost. The question of reasonableness is particularly important when the non- Federal entity is predominantly federally funded. In determining reasonableness of a given cost, consideration must be given to: (a) Whether the cost is of a type generally recognized as ordinary and necessary for the operation of the non-Federal entity or the proper and efficient performance of the Federal award. . . ." Public Law 116-136, Section 18003(d) states: "USES OF FUNDS.?A local educational agency that receives funds under this title may use funds for any of the following: (1) Any activity authorized by the ESEA of 1965, including the Native Hawaiian Education Act and the Alaska Native Educational Equity, Support, and Assistance Act (20 U.S.C. 6301 et seq.), the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (20 U.S.C. 1400 et seq.) ('IDEA'), the Adult Education and Family Literacy Act (20 U.S.C. 1400 et seq.), the Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Education Act of 2006 (20 U.S.C. 2301 et seq.) ('the Perkins Act'), or subtitle B of title VII of the McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 11431 et seq.). (2) Coordination of preparedness and response efforts of local educational agencies with State, local, Tribal, and territorial public health departments, and other relevant agencies, to improve coordinated responses among such entities to prevent, prepare for, and respond to coronavirus. (3) Providing principals and others school leaders with the resources necessary to address the needs of their individual schools. (4) Activities to address the unique needs of low-income children or students, children with disabilities, English learners, racial and ethnic minorities, students experiencing homelessness, and foster care youth, including how outreach and service delivery will meet the needs of each population. (5) Developing and implementing procedures and systems to improve the preparedness and response efforts of local educational agencies. (6) Training and professional development for staff of the local educational agency on sanitation and minimizing the spread of infectious diseases. (7) Purchasing supplies to sanitize and clean the facilities of a local educational agency, including buildings operated by such agency. (8) Planning for and coordinating during long-term closures, including for how to provide meals to eligible students, how to provide technology for online learning to all students, how to provide guidance for carrying out requirements under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (20 U.S.C. 1401 et seq.) and how to ensure other educational services can continue to be provided consistent with all Federal, State, and local requirements. (9) Purchasing educational technology (including hardware, software, and connectivity) for students who are served by the local educational agency that aids in regular and substantive educational interaction between students and their classroom instructors, including low-income students and students with disabilities, which may include assistive technology or adaptive equipment. (10) Providing mental health services and supports. (11) Planning and implementing activities related to summer learning and supplemental afterschool programs, including providing classroom instruction or online learning during the summer months and addressing the needs of low-income students, students with disabilities, English learners, migrant students, students experiencing homelessness, and children in foster care. (12) Other activities that are necessary to maintain the operation of and continuity of services in local educational H. R. 748?287 agencies and continuing to employ existing staff of the local educational agency." Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021, P.L. 116-260, section 313(d) states: "USES OF FUNDS.?A local educational agency that receives funds under this section may use the funds for any of the following: (1) Any activity authorized by the ESEA of 1965, including the Native Hawaiian Education Act and the Alaska Native Educational Equity, Support, and Assistance Act (20 U.S.C. 6301 et seq.), the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (20 U.S.C. 1400 et seq.) ('IDEA'), the Adult Education and Family Literacy Act (20 U.S.C. 1400 et seq.), the Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Education Act of 2006 (20 U.S.C. 2301 et seq.) ('the Perkins Act'), or subtitle B of title VII of the McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 11431 et seq.). (2) Coordination of preparedness and response efforts of local educational agencies with State, local, Tribal, and territorial public health departments, and other relevant agencies, to improve coordinated responses among such entities to prevent, prepare for, and respond to coronavirus. (3) Providing principals and others school leaders with the resources necessary to address the needs of their individual schools. (4) Activities to address the unique needs of low-income children or students, children with disabilities, English learners, racial and ethnic minorities, students experiencing homelessness, and foster care youth, including how outreach and service delivery will meet the needs of each population. (5) Developing and implementing procedures and systems to improve the preparedness and response efforts of local educational agencies. (6) Training and professional development for staff of the local educational agency on sanitation and minimizing the spread of infectious diseases. (7) Purchasing supplies to sanitize and clean the facilities of a local educational agency, including buildings operated by such agency. (8) Planning for, coordinating, and implementing activities during long-term closures, including providing meals to eligible students, providing technology for online learning to all students, providing guidance for carrying out requirements under the IDEA and ensuring other educational services can continue to be provided consistent with all Federal, State, and local requirements. (9) Purchasing educational technology (including hardware, software, and connectivity) for students who are served by the local educational agency that aids in regular and substantive educational interaction between students and their classroom instructors, including low-income students and children with disabilities, which may include assistive technology or adaptive equipment. (10) Providing mental health services and supports. (11) Planning and implementing activities related to summer learning and supplemental afterschool programs, including providing classroom instruction or online learning during the summer months and addressing the needs of low-income students, children with disabilities, English learners, migrant students, students experiencing homelessness, and children in foster care. (12) Addressing learning loss among students, including low-income students, children with disabilities, English learners, racial and ethnic minorities, students experiencing homelessness, and children and youth in foster care, of the local educational agency, including by? (A) Administering and using high-quality assessments that are valid and reliable, to accurately assess students? academic progress and assist educators in meeting students? academic needs, including through differentiating instruction. (B) Implementing evidence-based activities to meet the comprehensive needs of students. (C) Providing information and assistance to parents and families on how they can effectively support students, including in a distance learning environment. (D) Tracking student attendance and improving student engagement in distance education. (13) School facility repairs and improvements to enable operation of schools to reduce risk of virus transmission and exposure to environmental health hazards, and to support student health needs. (14) Inspection, testing, maintenance, repair, replacement, and upgrade projects to improve the indoor air quality in school facilities, including mechanical and non-mechanical heating, ventilation, and air conditioning systems, filtering, purification and other air cleaning, fans, control systems, and window and door repair and replacement. (15) Other activities that are necessary to maintain the operation of and continuity of services in local educational agencies and continuing to employ existing staff of the local educational agency." American Rescue Plan Act of 2021, H.R. 1319, section 2001(e) states: "USES OF FUNDS.?A local educational agency that receives funds under this section? (1) shall reserve not less than 20 percent of such funds to address learning loss through the implementation of evidence-based interventions, such as summer learning or summer enrichment, extended day, comprehensive afterschool programs, or extended school year programs, and ensure that such interventions respond to students' academic, social, and emotional needs and address the disproportionate impact of the coronavirus on the student subgroups described in section 1111(b)(2)(B)(xi) of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 6311(b)(2)(B)(xi)), students experiencing homelessness, and children and youth in foster care; and (2) shall use the remaining funds for any of the following: (A) Any activity authorized by the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965. (B) Any activity authorized by the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. (C) Any activity authorized by the Adult Education and Family Literacy Act. (D) Any activity authorized by the Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Education Act of 2006. (E) Coordination of preparedness and response efforts of local educational agencies with State, local, Tribal, and territorial public health departments, and other relevant agencies, to improve coordinated responses among such entities to prevent, prepare for, and respond to coronavirus. (F) Activities to address the unique needs of low-income children or students, children with disabilities, English learners, racial and ethnic minorities, students experiencing homelessness, and foster care youth, including how outreach and service delivery will meet the needs of each population. (G) Developing and implementing procedures and systems to improve the preparedness and response efforts of local educational agencies. (H) Training and professional development for staff of the local educational agency on sanitation and minimizing the spread of infectious diseases. (I) Purchasing supplies to sanitize and clean the facilities of a local educational agency, including buildings operated by such agency. (J) Planning for, coordinating, and implementing activities during long-term closures, including providing meals to eligible students, providing technology for online learning to all students, providing guidance for carrying out requirements under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act and ensuring other educational services can H. R. 1319?18 continue to be provided consistent with all Federal, State, and local requirements. (K) Purchasing educational technology (including hardware, software, and connectivity) for students who are served by the local educational agency that aids in regular and substantive educational interaction between students and their classroom instructors, including low-income students and children with disabilities, which may include assistive technology or adaptive equipment. (L) Providing mental health services and supports, including through the implementation of evidence-based full-service community schools. (M) Planning and implementing activities related to summer learning and supplemental afterschool programs, including providing classroom instruction or online learning during the summer months and addressing the needs of low-income students, children with disabilities, English learners, migrant students, students experiencing homelessness, and children in foster care. (N) Addressing learning loss among students, including low-income students, children with disabilities, English learners, racial and ethnic minorities, students experiencing homelessness, and children and youth in foster care, of the local educational agency, including by? (i) administering and using high-quality assessments that are valid and reliable, to accurately assess students' academic progress and assist educators in meeting students' academic needs, including through differentiating instruction; (ii) implementing evidence-based activities to meet the comprehensive needs of students; (iii) providing information and assistance to parents and families on how they can effectively support students, including in a distance learning environment; and (iv) tracking student attendance and improving student engagement in distance education. (O) School facility repairs and improvements to enable operation of schools to reduce risk of virus transmission and exposure to environmental health hazards, and to support student health needs. (P) Inspection, testing, maintenance, repair, replacement, and upgrade projects to improve the indoor air quality in school facilities, including mechanical and nonmechanical heating, ventilation, and air conditioning systems, filtering, purification and other air cleaning, fans, control systems, and window and door repair and replacement. (Q) Developing strategies and implementing public health protocols including, to the greatest extent practicable, policies in line with guidance from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention for the reopening and operation of school facilities to effectively maintain the health and safety of students, educators, and other staff. H. R. 1319?19 (R) Other activities that are necessary to maintain the operation of and continuity of services in local educational agencies and continuing to employ existing staff of the local educational agency." Cause The School Corporation's management had not developed a system of internal control that would have ensured compliance, or that supporting documentation would have been maintained and made available for audit related to the Activities Allowed or Unallowed and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements. Effect The failure to retain and provide appropriate supporting documentation prevented the determination of the School Corporation's compliance with the compliance requirements listed above. Questioned Costs Known questioned costs of $15,787 were identified as noted in the Condition and Context. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish internal controls to ensure that documentation will be maintained and made available for audit related to the grant agreement and the Activities Allowed or Unallowed and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
2 C.F.R. ? 3474.1 gives regulatory effect to the Department of Education for 2 CFR 200.403 (g) which provides that except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must be adequately documented in order to be allowable under Federal awards. Further, 2 C.F.R ? 200.303(a) provides that the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. The School District has established approved rates of pay for employees. Further, timesheets and/or single funded certificates was used to document time and effort of personnel relating to Title I activities. However, in the current year the employees were to be moved from the Title I program and did not complete timesheets/single funded certificates, which resulted in an estimated amount of $127,443 in Title I expenditures that could not be supported as related to Title I activities. As such, the $127,443 from the Title I Fund AL # 84.010 is considered a questioned cost. Failure to make corrections to employess and maintain the appropriate time and effort documentation resulted in questioned costs and can result in reduced future federal funding or the requirement to repay the Ohio Department of Education. The Treasurer should ensure all employees charging salaries and benefits to federal grants are allowable under the current year program and maintain the appropriate documentation supporting the time spent on the grant, in accordance with the School District?s policy.
2 CFR ? 3474.1 provides the Department of Education (DOE) adopts the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Guidance in 2 CFR part 200. Thus, this section gives regulatory effect to the OMB guidance and supplements the guidance as needed for the DOE, except as otherwise noted in that section. 2 CFR ?200.403(h) requires costs, in order to be allowable under Federal awards, must be incurred during the approved budget period. The District expended $105,192 from the Education Stabilization Fund, American Rescue Plan Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ARP ESSER, AL#84.425U), for costs which were incurred July 1, 2020 to March 13, 2020. These costs were incurred outside the budget period of March 13, 2020 through September 30, 2024. These expenditures which were originally charged to the General Fund and the Athletic Fund in the amounts of $73,471 and $31,721, respectively, and subsequently reallocated to the ARP ESSER Fund are not allowable under the terms of the grant awxard and 2 CFR 200.403(h). 2 CFR ?200.403(a) and (b) requires costs, in order to be allowable under Federal awards, to be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in the Federal award as to types or amounts of cost items. ARP ESSER funds may be used to support a wide range of activities, including activities that are necessary to maintain the operation of and continuity of services in the District and continuing to employ existing staff of the District. 2 CFR ?200.403(a) and (b) requires costs, in order to be allowable under Federal awards, to be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in the Federal award as to types or amounts of cost items. ARP ESSER funds may be used to support a wide range of activities, including activities that are necessary to maintain the operation of and continuity of services in the District and continuing to employ existing staff of the District. Due to deficiencies in internal policies and procedures over compliance, the District expended $105,192 which was not allowed under the terms of the ESSER III grant award and 2 CFR 200.403. The accompanying financial statements were adjusted for this error. Expenditures were increased in the General Fund by $73,471 and the Athletic Fund by $31,721 and decreased in the Education Stabilization Fund, ARP ESSER by $105, 192. The District was able to provide expenditure in the amount of $105,192 from the General Fund which were substituted for these funds that were determined to be unallowable To help avoid potential loss or decrease of federal funding, the District should establish and implement policies and procedures to verify that all expenditures made from federal funds are necessary, reasonable and fully supported by underlying documentation. Failure to do so could result in unallowable expenditures being paid out of grant funds and potential costs in future audits.
2 CFR ? 3474.1 provides the Department of Education (DOE) adopts the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Guidance in 2 CFR part 200. Thus, this section gives regulatory effect to the OMB guidance and supplements the guidance as needed for the DOE, except as otherwise noted in that section. 2 CFR ?200.403(h) requires costs, in order to be allowable under Federal awards, must be incurred during the approved budget period. The District expended $105,192 from the Education Stabilization Fund, American Rescue Plan Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ARP ESSER, AL#84.425U), for costs which were incurred July 1, 2020 to March 13, 2020. These costs were incurred outside the budget period of March 13, 2020 through September 30, 2024. These expenditures which were originally charged to the General Fund and the Athletic Fund in the amounts of $73,471 and $31,721, respectively, and subsequently reallocated to the ARP ESSER Fund are not allowable under the terms of the grant awxard and 2 CFR 200.403(h). 2 CFR ?200.403(a) and (b) requires costs, in order to be allowable under Federal awards, to be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in the Federal award as to types or amounts of cost items. ARP ESSER funds may be used to support a wide range of activities, including activities that are necessary to maintain the operation of and continuity of services in the District and continuing to employ existing staff of the District. 2 CFR ?200.403(a) and (b) requires costs, in order to be allowable under Federal awards, to be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in the Federal award as to types or amounts of cost items. ARP ESSER funds may be used to support a wide range of activities, including activities that are necessary to maintain the operation of and continuity of services in the District and continuing to employ existing staff of the District. Due to deficiencies in internal policies and procedures over compliance, the District expended $105,192 which was not allowed under the terms of the ESSER III grant award and 2 CFR 200.403. The accompanying financial statements were adjusted for this error. Expenditures were increased in the General Fund by $73,471 and the Athletic Fund by $31,721 and decreased in the Education Stabilization Fund, ARP ESSER by $105, 192. The District was able to provide expenditure in the amount of $105,192 from the General Fund which were substituted for these funds that were determined to be unallowable To help avoid potential loss or decrease of federal funding, the District should establish and implement policies and procedures to verify that all expenditures made from federal funds are necessary, reasonable and fully supported by underlying documentation. Failure to do so could result in unallowable expenditures being paid out of grant funds and potential costs in future audits.
FINDING 2022-003 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Earmarking Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education - Grants to States, Special Education - Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.173 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 20611-042-PN01, 21611-042-PN01, 21619-042-PN01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context The School Corporation is a member of the Northeast Indiana Special Education Cooperative (NEISEC). During fiscal year 2021-2022, the NEISEC operated the special education programs and spent the federal money on behalf of all its members. As the grant agreements were between the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE) and each member school, the School Corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the NEISEC. However, there was inadequate oversight performed by the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. The School Corporation did not have internal controls in place to ensure that the NEISEC complied with the earmarking requirements. The NEISEC did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that the required level of expenditures for non-public students with disabilities was met for each member school. The NEISEC did not have effective internal controls to ensure non-public school expenditures were appropriately identified and reported. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 18 DEKALB COUNTY EASTERN COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) The Non-Public Proportionate Share expenditures for the 20611-042-PN01, 21611-042-PN01, and 21619-042-PN01 grant awards could not be verified for the individual schools to verify the minimum amount per the grant awards was expended and properly reported to the IDOE as required. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were isolated to the 20611-042-PN01, 21611-042-PN01, and 21619-042-PN01 grant awards. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . . " 2 CFR 200.208(b) states in part: "The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may adjust specific Federal award conditions as needed . . ." 511 IAC 7-34-7(b) states: "The public agency, in providing special education and related services to students in nonpublic schools must expend at least an amount that is the same proportion of the public agency total subgrant under 20 U.S.C. 1411(f) as the number of nonpublic school students with disabilities, who are enrolled by their parents in nonpublic schools within its boundaries, is to the total number of students with disabilities of the same age range." Cause Management had not developed an effective system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the earmarking requirements of the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. Effect The failure to establish an effective internal control system, as well as adequately document costs of federal awards, prevented the determination of the School Corporation's compliance with the earmarking requirements of the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 19 DEKALB COUNTY EASTERN COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls, as well as appropriately document and identify federal award expenditures to ensure compliance with the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-003 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Earmarking Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education - Grants to States, Special Education - Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.173 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 20611-042-PN01, 21611-042-PN01, 21619-042-PN01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context The School Corporation is a member of the Northeast Indiana Special Education Cooperative (NEISEC). During fiscal year 2021-2022, the NEISEC operated the special education programs and spent the federal money on behalf of all its members. As the grant agreements were between the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE) and each member school, the School Corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the NEISEC. However, there was inadequate oversight performed by the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. The School Corporation did not have internal controls in place to ensure that the NEISEC complied with the earmarking requirements. The NEISEC did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that the required level of expenditures for non-public students with disabilities was met for each member school. The NEISEC did not have effective internal controls to ensure non-public school expenditures were appropriately identified and reported. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 18 DEKALB COUNTY EASTERN COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) The Non-Public Proportionate Share expenditures for the 20611-042-PN01, 21611-042-PN01, and 21619-042-PN01 grant awards could not be verified for the individual schools to verify the minimum amount per the grant awards was expended and properly reported to the IDOE as required. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were isolated to the 20611-042-PN01, 21611-042-PN01, and 21619-042-PN01 grant awards. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . . " 2 CFR 200.208(b) states in part: "The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may adjust specific Federal award conditions as needed . . ." 511 IAC 7-34-7(b) states: "The public agency, in providing special education and related services to students in nonpublic schools must expend at least an amount that is the same proportion of the public agency total subgrant under 20 U.S.C. 1411(f) as the number of nonpublic school students with disabilities, who are enrolled by their parents in nonpublic schools within its boundaries, is to the total number of students with disabilities of the same age range." Cause Management had not developed an effective system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the earmarking requirements of the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. Effect The failure to establish an effective internal control system, as well as adequately document costs of federal awards, prevented the determination of the School Corporation's compliance with the earmarking requirements of the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 19 DEKALB COUNTY EASTERN COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls, as well as appropriately document and identify federal award expenditures to ensure compliance with the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-003 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Earmarking Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education - Grants to States, Special Education - Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.173 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 20611-042-PN01, 21611-042-PN01, 21619-042-PN01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context The School Corporation is a member of the Northeast Indiana Special Education Cooperative (NEISEC). During fiscal year 2021-2022, the NEISEC operated the special education programs and spent the federal money on behalf of all its members. As the grant agreements were between the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE) and each member school, the School Corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the NEISEC. However, there was inadequate oversight performed by the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. The School Corporation did not have internal controls in place to ensure that the NEISEC complied with the earmarking requirements. The NEISEC did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that the required level of expenditures for non-public students with disabilities was met for each member school. The NEISEC did not have effective internal controls to ensure non-public school expenditures were appropriately identified and reported. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 18 DEKALB COUNTY EASTERN COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) The Non-Public Proportionate Share expenditures for the 20611-042-PN01, 21611-042-PN01, and 21619-042-PN01 grant awards could not be verified for the individual schools to verify the minimum amount per the grant awards was expended and properly reported to the IDOE as required. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were isolated to the 20611-042-PN01, 21611-042-PN01, and 21619-042-PN01 grant awards. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . . " 2 CFR 200.208(b) states in part: "The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may adjust specific Federal award conditions as needed . . ." 511 IAC 7-34-7(b) states: "The public agency, in providing special education and related services to students in nonpublic schools must expend at least an amount that is the same proportion of the public agency total subgrant under 20 U.S.C. 1411(f) as the number of nonpublic school students with disabilities, who are enrolled by their parents in nonpublic schools within its boundaries, is to the total number of students with disabilities of the same age range." Cause Management had not developed an effective system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the earmarking requirements of the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. Effect The failure to establish an effective internal control system, as well as adequately document costs of federal awards, prevented the determination of the School Corporation's compliance with the earmarking requirements of the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 19 DEKALB COUNTY EASTERN COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls, as well as appropriately document and identify federal award expenditures to ensure compliance with the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-005 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Earmarking Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Special Education Grants to States Assistance Listings Number: 84.027 Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): 21611-053-PN01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2020-005. Condition and Context The School Corporation is a member of the South LaPorte County Special Education Cooperative (Cooperative). During fiscal year 2021-2022, the Cooperative operated the special education programs and spent the federal money on behalf of all its member schools. As the grant agreements were between the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE) and each member school, the School Corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. There was inadequate oversight performed by the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. The School Corporation did not have internal controls in place to ensure that the Cooperative complied with the earmarking requirements. The Cooperative did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that the required level of expenditures for non-public school students with disabilities was met for each member school. The Cooperative did not have effective internal controls to ensure non-public school expenditures were appropriately identified and reported. The Non-Public Proportionate Share expenditures for the 21611-053-PN01 grant award could not be verified for the individual member schools. Total grant expenditures were posted as expended. The non-public proportionate share expenditures were determined by applying a percentage to the non-public school budgeted expenditures. These were the amounts reported to the IDOE. As such, we were unable to identify if the minimum amount per the grant awards was expended and properly reported to the IDOE as required. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance was isolated to the 21611-053-PN01 grant award. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 23 LAPORTE COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 2 CFR 200.208(b) states in part: "The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may adjust specific Federal award conditions as needed . . ." 511 IAC 7-34-7(b) states: "The public agency, in providing special education and related services to students in nonpublic schools must expend at least an amount that is the same proportion of the public agency total subgrant under 20 U.S.C. 1411(f) as the number of nonpublic school students with disabilities, who are enrolled by their parents in nonpublic schools within its boundaries, is to the total number of students with disabilities of the same age range." Cause The School Corporation's management had not developed an effective system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreements and the earmarking requirements of the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. Effect The failure to establish an effective internal control system, as well as adequately document costs of federal awards, prevented the determination of the School Corporation's compliance with the earmarking requirements of the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish an effective system of internal controls, as well as appropriately document and identify federal award expenditures to ensure compliance with the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-005 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Earmarking Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Special Education Grants to States Assistance Listings Number: 84.027 Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): 21611-053-PN01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2020-005. Condition and Context The School Corporation is a member of the South LaPorte County Special Education Cooperative (Cooperative). During fiscal year 2021-2022, the Cooperative operated the special education programs and spent the federal money on behalf of all its member schools. As the grant agreements were between the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE) and each member school, the School Corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. There was inadequate oversight performed by the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. The School Corporation did not have internal controls in place to ensure that the Cooperative complied with the earmarking requirements. The Cooperative did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that the required level of expenditures for non-public school students with disabilities was met for each member school. The Cooperative did not have effective internal controls to ensure non-public school expenditures were appropriately identified and reported. The Non-Public Proportionate Share expenditures for the 21611-053-PN01 grant award could not be verified for the individual member schools. Total grant expenditures were posted as expended. The non-public proportionate share expenditures were determined by applying a percentage to the non-public school budgeted expenditures. These were the amounts reported to the IDOE. As such, we were unable to identify if the minimum amount per the grant awards was expended and properly reported to the IDOE as required. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance was isolated to the 21611-053-PN01 grant award. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 23 LAPORTE COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 2 CFR 200.208(b) states in part: "The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may adjust specific Federal award conditions as needed . . ." 511 IAC 7-34-7(b) states: "The public agency, in providing special education and related services to students in nonpublic schools must expend at least an amount that is the same proportion of the public agency total subgrant under 20 U.S.C. 1411(f) as the number of nonpublic school students with disabilities, who are enrolled by their parents in nonpublic schools within its boundaries, is to the total number of students with disabilities of the same age range." Cause The School Corporation's management had not developed an effective system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreements and the earmarking requirements of the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. Effect The failure to establish an effective internal control system, as well as adequately document costs of federal awards, prevented the determination of the School Corporation's compliance with the earmarking requirements of the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish an effective system of internal controls, as well as appropriately document and identify federal award expenditures to ensure compliance with the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-004 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Earmarking Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.173 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 20611-042-PN01, 21611-042-PN01, 21619-042-PN01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking Audit Findings: Material Weakness; Modified Opinion Condition and Context The School Corporation is a member of the Northeast Indiana Special Education Cooperative (Cooperative). During fiscal year 2021-2022, the Cooperative operated the special education programs and spent the federal money on behalf of all its members. As the grant agreements were between the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE) and each member school, the School Corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. However, there was inadequate oversight performed by the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. The School Corporation did not have internal controls in place to ensure that the Cooperative complied with the earmarking requirements. The Cooperative did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that the required level of expenditures for non-public students with disabilities was met for each member school. The Cooperative did not have effective internal controls to ensure non-public school expenditures were appropriately identified and reported. The Non-Public Proportionate Share expenditures for 20611-042-PN01, 21611-042-PN01, 21619-042-PN01 grant awards could not be verified for the individual schools to verify the minimum amount per the grant awards was expended and properly reported to the IDOE as required. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were isolated to the 20611-042-PN01, 21611-042-PN01, 21619-042-PN01 grant awards. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 19 WEST NOBLE SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 2 CFR 200.208(b) states in part: "The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may adjust specific Federal award conditions as needed . . ." 511 IAC 7-34-7(b) states: "The public agency, in providing special education and related services to students in nonpublic schools must expend at least an amount that is the same proportion of the public agency total subgrant under 20 U.S.C. 1411(f) as the number of nonpublic school students with disabilities, who are enrolled by their parents in nonpublic schools within its boundaries, is to the total number of students with disabilities of the same age range." Cause Management had not developed an effective system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the earmarking requirements of the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. Effect The failure to establish an effective internal control system, as well as adequately document costs of federal awards, prevented the determination of the School Corporation's compliance with the earmarking requirements of the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls, as well as appropriately document and identify federal award expenditures to ensure compliance with the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-004 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Earmarking Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.173 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 20611-042-PN01, 21611-042-PN01, 21619-042-PN01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking Audit Findings: Material Weakness; Modified Opinion Condition and Context The School Corporation is a member of the Northeast Indiana Special Education Cooperative (Cooperative). During fiscal year 2021-2022, the Cooperative operated the special education programs and spent the federal money on behalf of all its members. As the grant agreements were between the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE) and each member school, the School Corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. However, there was inadequate oversight performed by the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. The School Corporation did not have internal controls in place to ensure that the Cooperative complied with the earmarking requirements. The Cooperative did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that the required level of expenditures for non-public students with disabilities was met for each member school. The Cooperative did not have effective internal controls to ensure non-public school expenditures were appropriately identified and reported. The Non-Public Proportionate Share expenditures for 20611-042-PN01, 21611-042-PN01, 21619-042-PN01 grant awards could not be verified for the individual schools to verify the minimum amount per the grant awards was expended and properly reported to the IDOE as required. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were isolated to the 20611-042-PN01, 21611-042-PN01, 21619-042-PN01 grant awards. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 19 WEST NOBLE SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 2 CFR 200.208(b) states in part: "The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may adjust specific Federal award conditions as needed . . ." 511 IAC 7-34-7(b) states: "The public agency, in providing special education and related services to students in nonpublic schools must expend at least an amount that is the same proportion of the public agency total subgrant under 20 U.S.C. 1411(f) as the number of nonpublic school students with disabilities, who are enrolled by their parents in nonpublic schools within its boundaries, is to the total number of students with disabilities of the same age range." Cause Management had not developed an effective system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the earmarking requirements of the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. Effect The failure to establish an effective internal control system, as well as adequately document costs of federal awards, prevented the determination of the School Corporation's compliance with the earmarking requirements of the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls, as well as appropriately document and identify federal award expenditures to ensure compliance with the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-004 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Earmarking Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.173 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 20611-042-PN01, 21611-042-PN01, 21619-042-PN01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking Audit Findings: Material Weakness; Modified Opinion Condition and Context The School Corporation is a member of the Northeast Indiana Special Education Cooperative (Cooperative). During fiscal year 2021-2022, the Cooperative operated the special education programs and spent the federal money on behalf of all its members. As the grant agreements were between the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE) and each member school, the School Corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. However, there was inadequate oversight performed by the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. The School Corporation did not have internal controls in place to ensure that the Cooperative complied with the earmarking requirements. The Cooperative did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that the required level of expenditures for non-public students with disabilities was met for each member school. The Cooperative did not have effective internal controls to ensure non-public school expenditures were appropriately identified and reported. The Non-Public Proportionate Share expenditures for 20611-042-PN01, 21611-042-PN01, 21619-042-PN01 grant awards could not be verified for the individual schools to verify the minimum amount per the grant awards was expended and properly reported to the IDOE as required. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were isolated to the 20611-042-PN01, 21611-042-PN01, 21619-042-PN01 grant awards. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 19 WEST NOBLE SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 2 CFR 200.208(b) states in part: "The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may adjust specific Federal award conditions as needed . . ." 511 IAC 7-34-7(b) states: "The public agency, in providing special education and related services to students in nonpublic schools must expend at least an amount that is the same proportion of the public agency total subgrant under 20 U.S.C. 1411(f) as the number of nonpublic school students with disabilities, who are enrolled by their parents in nonpublic schools within its boundaries, is to the total number of students with disabilities of the same age range." Cause Management had not developed an effective system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the earmarking requirements of the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. Effect The failure to establish an effective internal control system, as well as adequately document costs of federal awards, prevented the determination of the School Corporation's compliance with the earmarking requirements of the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls, as well as appropriately document and identify federal award expenditures to ensure compliance with the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-004 Information on the federal program: Subject: Special Education Cluster - Earmarking Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.173 Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Numbers): 20611-042-PN01, 20619-042-PN01, 21611-042-PN01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Matching, Level of Compliance Requirement: Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking Audit Finding: Significant Deficiency Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)...." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: ? (g) Be adequately documented.... " 2 CFR 200.208(b) states in part: "The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may adjust specific Federal award conditions as needed . . ." 511 IAC 7-34-7(b) states: "The public agency, in providing special education and related services to students in nonpublic schools must expend at least an amount that is the same proportion of the public agency total subgrant under 20 U.S.C. 1411(f) as the number of nonpublic school students with disabilities, who are enrolled by their parents in nonpublic schools within its boundaries, is to the total number of students with disabilities of the same age range." Condition: The School Corporation is a member of the Northeast Indiana Special Education Cooperative (Cooperative). During fiscal year 2021-2022, the Cooperative operated the special education programs and spent the federal money on behalf of all its members. As the grant agreements were between the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE) and each member school, the School Corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. However, there was inadequate oversight performed by the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. The School Corporation did not have internal controls in place to ensure that the Cooperative complied with the earmarking requirements. The Cooperative did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that the required level of expenditures for non-public students with disabilities was met for each member school. The Cooperative did not have effective internal controls to ensure non-public school expenditures were appropriately identified and reported. Cause: The School Corporation's management had not developed an effective system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the earmarking requirements of the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system, as well as adequately document costs of federal awards, prevented the determination of the School Corporation's compliance with the earmarking requirements of the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: The Non-Public Proportionate Share expenditures for 19611-042-PN01, 19619-042-PN01, 20611-042-PN01, 20619-042-PN01, 21611-042-PN01, 20619-042-PN01 grant awards could not be verified for the individual schools to verify the minimum amount per the grant awards was expended and properly reported to IDOE as required. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were isolated to the 19611-042-PN01, 19619-042-PN01, 20611-042-PN01, 20619-042-PN01, 21611-042-PN01, 20619-042-PN01 grant awards. Identification as a repeat finding: No. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls, as well as appropriately document and identify federal award expenditures to ensure compliance with the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
FINDING 2022-004 Information on the federal program: Subject: Special Education Cluster - Earmarking Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.173 Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Numbers): 20611-042-PN01, 20619-042-PN01, 21611-042-PN01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Matching, Level of Compliance Requirement: Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking Audit Finding: Significant Deficiency Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)...." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: ? (g) Be adequately documented.... " 2 CFR 200.208(b) states in part: "The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may adjust specific Federal award conditions as needed . . ." 511 IAC 7-34-7(b) states: "The public agency, in providing special education and related services to students in nonpublic schools must expend at least an amount that is the same proportion of the public agency total subgrant under 20 U.S.C. 1411(f) as the number of nonpublic school students with disabilities, who are enrolled by their parents in nonpublic schools within its boundaries, is to the total number of students with disabilities of the same age range." Condition: The School Corporation is a member of the Northeast Indiana Special Education Cooperative (Cooperative). During fiscal year 2021-2022, the Cooperative operated the special education programs and spent the federal money on behalf of all its members. As the grant agreements were between the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE) and each member school, the School Corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. However, there was inadequate oversight performed by the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. The School Corporation did not have internal controls in place to ensure that the Cooperative complied with the earmarking requirements. The Cooperative did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that the required level of expenditures for non-public students with disabilities was met for each member school. The Cooperative did not have effective internal controls to ensure non-public school expenditures were appropriately identified and reported. Cause: The School Corporation's management had not developed an effective system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the earmarking requirements of the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system, as well as adequately document costs of federal awards, prevented the determination of the School Corporation's compliance with the earmarking requirements of the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: The Non-Public Proportionate Share expenditures for 19611-042-PN01, 19619-042-PN01, 20611-042-PN01, 20619-042-PN01, 21611-042-PN01, 20619-042-PN01 grant awards could not be verified for the individual schools to verify the minimum amount per the grant awards was expended and properly reported to IDOE as required. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were isolated to the 19611-042-PN01, 19619-042-PN01, 20611-042-PN01, 20619-042-PN01, 21611-042-PN01, 20619-042-PN01 grant awards. Identification as a repeat finding: No. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls, as well as appropriately document and identify federal award expenditures to ensure compliance with the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
FINDING 2022-004 Information on the federal program: Subject: Special Education Cluster - Earmarking Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.173 Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Numbers): 20611-042-PN01, 20619-042-PN01, 21611-042-PN01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Matching, Level of Compliance Requirement: Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking Audit Finding: Significant Deficiency Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)...." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: ? (g) Be adequately documented.... " 2 CFR 200.208(b) states in part: "The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may adjust specific Federal award conditions as needed . . ." 511 IAC 7-34-7(b) states: "The public agency, in providing special education and related services to students in nonpublic schools must expend at least an amount that is the same proportion of the public agency total subgrant under 20 U.S.C. 1411(f) as the number of nonpublic school students with disabilities, who are enrolled by their parents in nonpublic schools within its boundaries, is to the total number of students with disabilities of the same age range." Condition: The School Corporation is a member of the Northeast Indiana Special Education Cooperative (Cooperative). During fiscal year 2021-2022, the Cooperative operated the special education programs and spent the federal money on behalf of all its members. As the grant agreements were between the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE) and each member school, the School Corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. However, there was inadequate oversight performed by the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. The School Corporation did not have internal controls in place to ensure that the Cooperative complied with the earmarking requirements. The Cooperative did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that the required level of expenditures for non-public students with disabilities was met for each member school. The Cooperative did not have effective internal controls to ensure non-public school expenditures were appropriately identified and reported. Cause: The School Corporation's management had not developed an effective system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the earmarking requirements of the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system, as well as adequately document costs of federal awards, prevented the determination of the School Corporation's compliance with the earmarking requirements of the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: The Non-Public Proportionate Share expenditures for 19611-042-PN01, 19619-042-PN01, 20611-042-PN01, 20619-042-PN01, 21611-042-PN01, 20619-042-PN01 grant awards could not be verified for the individual schools to verify the minimum amount per the grant awards was expended and properly reported to IDOE as required. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were isolated to the 19611-042-PN01, 19619-042-PN01, 20611-042-PN01, 20619-042-PN01, 21611-042-PN01, 20619-042-PN01 grant awards. Identification as a repeat finding: No. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls, as well as appropriately document and identify federal award expenditures to ensure compliance with the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
FINDING 2022-004 Information on the federal program: Subject: Special Education Cluster - Earmarking Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.173 Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Numbers): 20611-042-PN01, 20619-042-PN01, 21611-042-PN01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Matching, Level of Compliance Requirement: Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking Audit Finding: Significant Deficiency Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)...." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: ? (g) Be adequately documented.... " 2 CFR 200.208(b) states in part: "The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may adjust specific Federal award conditions as needed . . ." 511 IAC 7-34-7(b) states: "The public agency, in providing special education and related services to students in nonpublic schools must expend at least an amount that is the same proportion of the public agency total subgrant under 20 U.S.C. 1411(f) as the number of nonpublic school students with disabilities, who are enrolled by their parents in nonpublic schools within its boundaries, is to the total number of students with disabilities of the same age range." Condition: The School Corporation is a member of the Northeast Indiana Special Education Cooperative (Cooperative). During fiscal year 2021-2022, the Cooperative operated the special education programs and spent the federal money on behalf of all its members. As the grant agreements were between the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE) and each member school, the School Corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. However, there was inadequate oversight performed by the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. The School Corporation did not have internal controls in place to ensure that the Cooperative complied with the earmarking requirements. The Cooperative did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that the required level of expenditures for non-public students with disabilities was met for each member school. The Cooperative did not have effective internal controls to ensure non-public school expenditures were appropriately identified and reported. Cause: The School Corporation's management had not developed an effective system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the earmarking requirements of the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system, as well as adequately document costs of federal awards, prevented the determination of the School Corporation's compliance with the earmarking requirements of the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: The Non-Public Proportionate Share expenditures for 19611-042-PN01, 19619-042-PN01, 20611-042-PN01, 20619-042-PN01, 21611-042-PN01, 20619-042-PN01 grant awards could not be verified for the individual schools to verify the minimum amount per the grant awards was expended and properly reported to IDOE as required. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were isolated to the 19611-042-PN01, 19619-042-PN01, 20611-042-PN01, 20619-042-PN01, 21611-042-PN01, 20619-042-PN01 grant awards. Identification as a repeat finding: No. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls, as well as appropriately document and identify federal award expenditures to ensure compliance with the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
Information on Federal Programs U.S. Department of Homeland Security ALN No. 97.036, Disaster Grants ? Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); Award Number: 033-UECF5-00; Award Year: January 1, 2020 to July 1, 2022; Pass-Through Entity: State of Washington Military Department Emergency Medicine Division; Award Number: D20-368 Specific Requirements/Criteria Per CFR Part 200.403, costs must be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be adequately documented. Condition During our testing of the internal controls and compliance over the Activities Allowed and Unallowed process, we noted controls that were designed to ensure that expenses related to the COVID-19 pandemic were actually incurred were ineffective in certain circumstances. To test the compliance of this process, we tested a total of 41 expense transactions to ensure the expense was incurred and attributable to coronavirus as per the terms and conditions of the grant agreement. Of the 41 expense transactions tested, 32 were related to the procurement of materials. We noted that for 1 of the 32 materials transactions tested, the reimbursement claimed was greater than the eligible coronavirus related expense. This difference was caused by the amount claimed for reimbursement for part of the transaction being based on an estimate of the materials to be received, but the amount of materials received was lower. The amount of costs associated with materials not received was included in the reimbursement request. The FEMA reimbursements associated with procurement of materials was $3,251,718 for the year ending June 30, 2022. Out of the 32 material transactions tested, the 1 transaction that was not supported by eligible costs was $37,665, resulting in likely questioned costs of $146,146. The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Cause The above finding was caused by the control not being designed with sufficient precision to ensure a detail level of review was conducted to identify whether or not the materials claimed for reimbursement were based on actual incurred eligible coronavirus expenses. Effect The schedule of expenditures of federal awards is inappropriately stated as of June 30, 2022 because ineligible costs were charged to the program. Questioned Costs $37,665 Repeat Finding from Prior Year Yes ? Finding 2021-002 Recommendation We recommend that the Association implement procedures and policies to ensure that the amounts being claimed for reimbursement are based on actual expenditures incurred. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action Management agrees with the finding and recommendation. Internal controls will be strengthened in future periods to ensure that costs are incurred (receipt of goods/services) and payments are made prior to submitting a request for reimbursement. Ledger details for reimbursement requests will be filtered to exclude items not yet received or paid. The accounting team will review and pull supporting invoice and payment records to be reviewed by the Director of Finance prior to submission to ensure all expenditures have been paid prior to submitting a request for reimbursement.
U.S. Department of Education Higher Education Institutional Aid CFDA 84.031 Award Year 2022 Criteria or Specific Requirement - Allowable Costs. According to 2 CFR Section 200.403(b), allowable costs must conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. Condition - The College charged faculty and staff wages unrelated to the Title V program to the grant during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2022. Questioned Costs - Grant Award Number: P031S190265 - 21. Error resulted in questioned costs of $34,056 awarded to the College. During review of the detailed listed of Title V revenue recorded, we identified certain expenses that did not appear consistent with the detailed federal grant schedule provided by management. Context - Out of a population of 26 payroll periods totaling $261,616, we selected one key item for $34,056 and a sample of four payroll periods totaling $27,661 to review the salaries paid to employees and charged to the federal award. The entire balance of the $34,056 key item was drawn down in error for staff wages and fringe benefits which were not related to the approved federal grant services. The sample was not, and was not intended to be, a statistically valid sample. Effect - College records did not support the salary expenses charged to the federal award. Cause - Management oversight when completing salary reconciliation. Identification as a Repeat Finding - Yes, see findings 2021-004 and 2020-009. Recommendation - The College should implement processes and controls to ensure that all employees paid with federal grant funds are compared against the budget amounts provided to the grant administrator. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - Adjustments have been made to drawdowns in April and June of 2022 in order to correct for these overdraws. However, even after these corrections, $694.47 was still overdrawn from FY22. This amount will be corrected in a future Title V draw for this amount. Salary drawdowns will be required to have backup payroll documentation for each draw in the future.
FA 2022-001 Strengthen Controls over Expenditures Compliance Requirements: Activities Allowed or Unallowed Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Internal Control Impact: Significant Deficiency Compliance Impact: Nonmaterial Noncompliance Federal Awarding Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-Through Entity: Georgia Department of Education AL Numbers and Titles: COVID-19 ? 84.425D ? Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund COVID-19 ? 84.425U ? American Rescue Plan Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund COVID-19 ? 84.425W ? American Rescue Plan Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund Federal Award Numbers: S425D200012 (Year: 2020), S425D210012 (Year: 2021), S425U210012 (Year: 2021), S425W210011 (Year: 2021) Questioned Costs: $99,748 Description: The policies and procedures of the School District were insufficient to provide adequate internal controls over expenditures as it relates to the Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund program. Background: On March 27, 2020, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act was signed into law. The CARES Act was designed to mitigate the economic effects of the COVID-19 pandemic in a variety of ways, including providing additional funding for local educational agencies (LEAs) navigating the impact of the COVID-19 outbreak. Provisions included in Title VIII of the CARES Act created the Education Stabilization Fund to provide financial resources to educational entities to prevent, prepare for, and respond to the coronavirus. The CARES Act allocated $30.75 billion, the Coronavirus Response and Relief Supplemental Appropriations Act allocated an additional $81.9 billion, and the American Rescue Plan Act added $165.1 billion in funding to the Education Stabilization Fund. Multiple Education Stabilization Fund subprograms were created and allotted funding through the various COVID-19-related legislation. Of these programs, the Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER) Fund was created to address the impact that COVID-19 has had, and continues to have, on elementary and secondary schools across the nation. ESSER funding was granted to the Georgia Department of Education (GaDOE) by the U.S. Department of Education (ED). GaDOE is responsible for distributing funds to LEAs and overseeing the expenditure of funds by LEAs. ESSER funds totaling $13,647,015 were expended and reported on the Polk County School District?s Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) for fiscal year 2022. Criteria: As a recipient of federal awards, the Institution is required to establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance of managing the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal awards pursuant to Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), Section 200.303 ? Internal Controls. Provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.403 ? Factors Affecting Allowability of Costs state that ?costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles, (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items, (c) Be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the non-Federal entity? (g) Be adequately documented?? In addition, provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 202.403 ? Reasonable Costs state that ?a cost is reasonable if, in its nature and amount, it does not exceed that which would be incurred by a prudent person under the circumstances prevailing at the time the decision was made to incur the cost. The question of reasonableness is particularly important when the non-Federal entity is predominantly federally-funded. In determining reasonableness of a given cost, consideration must be given to: (a) Whether the cost is of a type generally recognized as ordinary and necessary for the operation of the non-Federal entity or the proper and efficient performance of the Federal award. (b) The restraints or requirements imposed by such factors as: sound business practices; arm?s-length bargaining; Federal, state, local, tribal, and other laws and regulations; and terms and conditions of the Federal award? (d) Whether the individuals concerned acted with prudence in the circumstances considering their responsibilities to the non-Federal entity, its employees, where applicable its students or membership, the public at large, and the Federal Government. (e) Whether the non-Federal entity significantly deviates from its established practices and policies regarding the incurrence of costs, which may unjustifiably increase the Federal award?s cost.? Furthermore, provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.318 ? General Procurement Standards state that ?the non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations? for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward?? Condition: Auditors performed a review of expenditure activity associated with the ESSER program to determine if appropriate internal controls were implemented and applicable compliance requirements were met. This testing revealed the following deficiencies: ? Bonuses totaling $37,327 were paid to individuals who were not employees of the School District. These individuals were hired to perform specific functions as detailed within the associated contracts and were paid amounts in excess of the stated rate noted within these contracts. ? A payment in the amount of $62,421 was made to the janitorial company utilized by the School District to provide bonuses to janitorial contractors who were not employees of the School District. These individuals were assigned to work within the School District by the private janitorial company. Per review of the contract in place during the fiscal year under review, it was noted that these bonuses represented amounts in excess of the agreed upon price. Therefore, expenditures totaling $99,748 were not considered to be reasonable and necessary for the performance of the ESSER program and deemed unallowable. Questioned Costs: Known questioned costs of $99,748 were identified for expenditures that were not incurred for a necessary and reasonable purpose and did not follow the School District?s policies and procedures. These known questioned costs related to expenditures that were not tested as part of a sample, and therefore, should not be projected to a population to determine likely questioned costs. Cause: Per discussion with management, the School District believed that the expenditures were allowable as the expenditures were approved by GaDOE through the Consolidated Application process; however, they were not aware that contract amendments should be initiated prior to the expenditure of funds in this manner. Effect or Potential Effect: The School District is not in compliance with the Uniform Guidance, ED, or GaDOE guidance related to the ESSER program. Failure to ensure that appropriate policies and procedures are followed when expending federal funds may expose the School District to unnecessary financial strains and shortages as GaDOE may require the School District to return funds associated with unallowable expenditures. Recommendation: The School District should review current internal control procedures related to ESSER program expenditures. Where vulnerable, the School District should develop and/or modify its policies and procedures to ensure that expenditures are in line with provisions reflected within the associated contract and/or contract amendments. In addition, the School District should implement a monitoring process to ensure that all expenditures are compliant with the School District?s purchasing and employee compensation policies and procedures. Views of Responsible Officials: We concur with this finding.
FA 2022-001 Strengthen Controls over Expenditures Compliance Requirements: Activities Allowed or Unallowed Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Internal Control Impact: Significant Deficiency Compliance Impact: Nonmaterial Noncompliance Federal Awarding Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-Through Entity: Georgia Department of Education AL Numbers and Titles: COVID-19 ? 84.425D ? Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund COVID-19 ? 84.425U ? American Rescue Plan Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund COVID-19 ? 84.425W ? American Rescue Plan Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund Federal Award Numbers: S425D200012 (Year: 2020), S425D210012 (Year: 2021), S425U210012 (Year: 2021), S425W210011 (Year: 2021) Questioned Costs: $99,748 Description: The policies and procedures of the School District were insufficient to provide adequate internal controls over expenditures as it relates to the Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund program. Background: On March 27, 2020, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act was signed into law. The CARES Act was designed to mitigate the economic effects of the COVID-19 pandemic in a variety of ways, including providing additional funding for local educational agencies (LEAs) navigating the impact of the COVID-19 outbreak. Provisions included in Title VIII of the CARES Act created the Education Stabilization Fund to provide financial resources to educational entities to prevent, prepare for, and respond to the coronavirus. The CARES Act allocated $30.75 billion, the Coronavirus Response and Relief Supplemental Appropriations Act allocated an additional $81.9 billion, and the American Rescue Plan Act added $165.1 billion in funding to the Education Stabilization Fund. Multiple Education Stabilization Fund subprograms were created and allotted funding through the various COVID-19-related legislation. Of these programs, the Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER) Fund was created to address the impact that COVID-19 has had, and continues to have, on elementary and secondary schools across the nation. ESSER funding was granted to the Georgia Department of Education (GaDOE) by the U.S. Department of Education (ED). GaDOE is responsible for distributing funds to LEAs and overseeing the expenditure of funds by LEAs. ESSER funds totaling $13,647,015 were expended and reported on the Polk County School District?s Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) for fiscal year 2022. Criteria: As a recipient of federal awards, the Institution is required to establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance of managing the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal awards pursuant to Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), Section 200.303 ? Internal Controls. Provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.403 ? Factors Affecting Allowability of Costs state that ?costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles, (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items, (c) Be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the non-Federal entity? (g) Be adequately documented?? In addition, provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 202.403 ? Reasonable Costs state that ?a cost is reasonable if, in its nature and amount, it does not exceed that which would be incurred by a prudent person under the circumstances prevailing at the time the decision was made to incur the cost. The question of reasonableness is particularly important when the non-Federal entity is predominantly federally-funded. In determining reasonableness of a given cost, consideration must be given to: (a) Whether the cost is of a type generally recognized as ordinary and necessary for the operation of the non-Federal entity or the proper and efficient performance of the Federal award. (b) The restraints or requirements imposed by such factors as: sound business practices; arm?s-length bargaining; Federal, state, local, tribal, and other laws and regulations; and terms and conditions of the Federal award? (d) Whether the individuals concerned acted with prudence in the circumstances considering their responsibilities to the non-Federal entity, its employees, where applicable its students or membership, the public at large, and the Federal Government. (e) Whether the non-Federal entity significantly deviates from its established practices and policies regarding the incurrence of costs, which may unjustifiably increase the Federal award?s cost.? Furthermore, provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.318 ? General Procurement Standards state that ?the non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations? for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward?? Condition: Auditors performed a review of expenditure activity associated with the ESSER program to determine if appropriate internal controls were implemented and applicable compliance requirements were met. This testing revealed the following deficiencies: ? Bonuses totaling $37,327 were paid to individuals who were not employees of the School District. These individuals were hired to perform specific functions as detailed within the associated contracts and were paid amounts in excess of the stated rate noted within these contracts. ? A payment in the amount of $62,421 was made to the janitorial company utilized by the School District to provide bonuses to janitorial contractors who were not employees of the School District. These individuals were assigned to work within the School District by the private janitorial company. Per review of the contract in place during the fiscal year under review, it was noted that these bonuses represented amounts in excess of the agreed upon price. Therefore, expenditures totaling $99,748 were not considered to be reasonable and necessary for the performance of the ESSER program and deemed unallowable. Questioned Costs: Known questioned costs of $99,748 were identified for expenditures that were not incurred for a necessary and reasonable purpose and did not follow the School District?s policies and procedures. These known questioned costs related to expenditures that were not tested as part of a sample, and therefore, should not be projected to a population to determine likely questioned costs. Cause: Per discussion with management, the School District believed that the expenditures were allowable as the expenditures were approved by GaDOE through the Consolidated Application process; however, they were not aware that contract amendments should be initiated prior to the expenditure of funds in this manner. Effect or Potential Effect: The School District is not in compliance with the Uniform Guidance, ED, or GaDOE guidance related to the ESSER program. Failure to ensure that appropriate policies and procedures are followed when expending federal funds may expose the School District to unnecessary financial strains and shortages as GaDOE may require the School District to return funds associated with unallowable expenditures. Recommendation: The School District should review current internal control procedures related to ESSER program expenditures. Where vulnerable, the School District should develop and/or modify its policies and procedures to ensure that expenditures are in line with provisions reflected within the associated contract and/or contract amendments. In addition, the School District should implement a monitoring process to ensure that all expenditures are compliant with the School District?s purchasing and employee compensation policies and procedures. Views of Responsible Officials: We concur with this finding.
FA 2022-001 Strengthen Controls over Expenditures Compliance Requirements: Activities Allowed or Unallowed Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Internal Control Impact: Significant Deficiency Compliance Impact: Nonmaterial Noncompliance Federal Awarding Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-Through Entity: Georgia Department of Education AL Numbers and Titles: COVID-19 ? 84.425D ? Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund COVID-19 ? 84.425U ? American Rescue Plan Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund COVID-19 ? 84.425W ? American Rescue Plan Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund Federal Award Numbers: S425D200012 (Year: 2020), S425D210012 (Year: 2021), S425U210012 (Year: 2021), S425W210011 (Year: 2021) Questioned Costs: $99,748 Description: The policies and procedures of the School District were insufficient to provide adequate internal controls over expenditures as it relates to the Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund program. Background: On March 27, 2020, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act was signed into law. The CARES Act was designed to mitigate the economic effects of the COVID-19 pandemic in a variety of ways, including providing additional funding for local educational agencies (LEAs) navigating the impact of the COVID-19 outbreak. Provisions included in Title VIII of the CARES Act created the Education Stabilization Fund to provide financial resources to educational entities to prevent, prepare for, and respond to the coronavirus. The CARES Act allocated $30.75 billion, the Coronavirus Response and Relief Supplemental Appropriations Act allocated an additional $81.9 billion, and the American Rescue Plan Act added $165.1 billion in funding to the Education Stabilization Fund. Multiple Education Stabilization Fund subprograms were created and allotted funding through the various COVID-19-related legislation. Of these programs, the Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER) Fund was created to address the impact that COVID-19 has had, and continues to have, on elementary and secondary schools across the nation. ESSER funding was granted to the Georgia Department of Education (GaDOE) by the U.S. Department of Education (ED). GaDOE is responsible for distributing funds to LEAs and overseeing the expenditure of funds by LEAs. ESSER funds totaling $13,647,015 were expended and reported on the Polk County School District?s Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) for fiscal year 2022. Criteria: As a recipient of federal awards, the Institution is required to establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance of managing the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal awards pursuant to Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), Section 200.303 ? Internal Controls. Provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.403 ? Factors Affecting Allowability of Costs state that ?costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles, (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items, (c) Be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the non-Federal entity? (g) Be adequately documented?? In addition, provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 202.403 ? Reasonable Costs state that ?a cost is reasonable if, in its nature and amount, it does not exceed that which would be incurred by a prudent person under the circumstances prevailing at the time the decision was made to incur the cost. The question of reasonableness is particularly important when the non-Federal entity is predominantly federally-funded. In determining reasonableness of a given cost, consideration must be given to: (a) Whether the cost is of a type generally recognized as ordinary and necessary for the operation of the non-Federal entity or the proper and efficient performance of the Federal award. (b) The restraints or requirements imposed by such factors as: sound business practices; arm?s-length bargaining; Federal, state, local, tribal, and other laws and regulations; and terms and conditions of the Federal award? (d) Whether the individuals concerned acted with prudence in the circumstances considering their responsibilities to the non-Federal entity, its employees, where applicable its students or membership, the public at large, and the Federal Government. (e) Whether the non-Federal entity significantly deviates from its established practices and policies regarding the incurrence of costs, which may unjustifiably increase the Federal award?s cost.? Furthermore, provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.318 ? General Procurement Standards state that ?the non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations? for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward?? Condition: Auditors performed a review of expenditure activity associated with the ESSER program to determine if appropriate internal controls were implemented and applicable compliance requirements were met. This testing revealed the following deficiencies: ? Bonuses totaling $37,327 were paid to individuals who were not employees of the School District. These individuals were hired to perform specific functions as detailed within the associated contracts and were paid amounts in excess of the stated rate noted within these contracts. ? A payment in the amount of $62,421 was made to the janitorial company utilized by the School District to provide bonuses to janitorial contractors who were not employees of the School District. These individuals were assigned to work within the School District by the private janitorial company. Per review of the contract in place during the fiscal year under review, it was noted that these bonuses represented amounts in excess of the agreed upon price. Therefore, expenditures totaling $99,748 were not considered to be reasonable and necessary for the performance of the ESSER program and deemed unallowable. Questioned Costs: Known questioned costs of $99,748 were identified for expenditures that were not incurred for a necessary and reasonable purpose and did not follow the School District?s policies and procedures. These known questioned costs related to expenditures that were not tested as part of a sample, and therefore, should not be projected to a population to determine likely questioned costs. Cause: Per discussion with management, the School District believed that the expenditures were allowable as the expenditures were approved by GaDOE through the Consolidated Application process; however, they were not aware that contract amendments should be initiated prior to the expenditure of funds in this manner. Effect or Potential Effect: The School District is not in compliance with the Uniform Guidance, ED, or GaDOE guidance related to the ESSER program. Failure to ensure that appropriate policies and procedures are followed when expending federal funds may expose the School District to unnecessary financial strains and shortages as GaDOE may require the School District to return funds associated with unallowable expenditures. Recommendation: The School District should review current internal control procedures related to ESSER program expenditures. Where vulnerable, the School District should develop and/or modify its policies and procedures to ensure that expenditures are in line with provisions reflected within the associated contract and/or contract amendments. In addition, the School District should implement a monitoring process to ensure that all expenditures are compliant with the School District?s purchasing and employee compensation policies and procedures. Views of Responsible Officials: We concur with this finding.
FA 2022-001 Strengthen Controls over Expenditures Compliance Requirements: Activities Allowed or Unallowed Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Internal Control Impact: Significant Deficiency Compliance Impact: Nonmaterial Noncompliance Federal Awarding Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-Through Entity: Georgia Department of Education AL Numbers and Titles: COVID-19 ? 84.425D ? Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund COVID-19 ? 84.425U ? American Rescue Plan Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund COVID-19 ? 84.425W ? American Rescue Plan Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund Federal Award Numbers: S425D200012 (Year: 2020), S425D210012 (Year: 2021), S425U210012 (Year: 2021), S425W210011 (Year: 2021) Questioned Costs: $99,748 Description: The policies and procedures of the School District were insufficient to provide adequate internal controls over expenditures as it relates to the Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund program. Background: On March 27, 2020, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act was signed into law. The CARES Act was designed to mitigate the economic effects of the COVID-19 pandemic in a variety of ways, including providing additional funding for local educational agencies (LEAs) navigating the impact of the COVID-19 outbreak. Provisions included in Title VIII of the CARES Act created the Education Stabilization Fund to provide financial resources to educational entities to prevent, prepare for, and respond to the coronavirus. The CARES Act allocated $30.75 billion, the Coronavirus Response and Relief Supplemental Appropriations Act allocated an additional $81.9 billion, and the American Rescue Plan Act added $165.1 billion in funding to the Education Stabilization Fund. Multiple Education Stabilization Fund subprograms were created and allotted funding through the various COVID-19-related legislation. Of these programs, the Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER) Fund was created to address the impact that COVID-19 has had, and continues to have, on elementary and secondary schools across the nation. ESSER funding was granted to the Georgia Department of Education (GaDOE) by the U.S. Department of Education (ED). GaDOE is responsible for distributing funds to LEAs and overseeing the expenditure of funds by LEAs. ESSER funds totaling $13,647,015 were expended and reported on the Polk County School District?s Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) for fiscal year 2022. Criteria: As a recipient of federal awards, the Institution is required to establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance of managing the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal awards pursuant to Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), Section 200.303 ? Internal Controls. Provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.403 ? Factors Affecting Allowability of Costs state that ?costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles, (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items, (c) Be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the non-Federal entity? (g) Be adequately documented?? In addition, provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 202.403 ? Reasonable Costs state that ?a cost is reasonable if, in its nature and amount, it does not exceed that which would be incurred by a prudent person under the circumstances prevailing at the time the decision was made to incur the cost. The question of reasonableness is particularly important when the non-Federal entity is predominantly federally-funded. In determining reasonableness of a given cost, consideration must be given to: (a) Whether the cost is of a type generally recognized as ordinary and necessary for the operation of the non-Federal entity or the proper and efficient performance of the Federal award. (b) The restraints or requirements imposed by such factors as: sound business practices; arm?s-length bargaining; Federal, state, local, tribal, and other laws and regulations; and terms and conditions of the Federal award? (d) Whether the individuals concerned acted with prudence in the circumstances considering their responsibilities to the non-Federal entity, its employees, where applicable its students or membership, the public at large, and the Federal Government. (e) Whether the non-Federal entity significantly deviates from its established practices and policies regarding the incurrence of costs, which may unjustifiably increase the Federal award?s cost.? Furthermore, provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.318 ? General Procurement Standards state that ?the non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations? for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward?? Condition: Auditors performed a review of expenditure activity associated with the ESSER program to determine if appropriate internal controls were implemented and applicable compliance requirements were met. This testing revealed the following deficiencies: ? Bonuses totaling $37,327 were paid to individuals who were not employees of the School District. These individuals were hired to perform specific functions as detailed within the associated contracts and were paid amounts in excess of the stated rate noted within these contracts. ? A payment in the amount of $62,421 was made to the janitorial company utilized by the School District to provide bonuses to janitorial contractors who were not employees of the School District. These individuals were assigned to work within the School District by the private janitorial company. Per review of the contract in place during the fiscal year under review, it was noted that these bonuses represented amounts in excess of the agreed upon price. Therefore, expenditures totaling $99,748 were not considered to be reasonable and necessary for the performance of the ESSER program and deemed unallowable. Questioned Costs: Known questioned costs of $99,748 were identified for expenditures that were not incurred for a necessary and reasonable purpose and did not follow the School District?s policies and procedures. These known questioned costs related to expenditures that were not tested as part of a sample, and therefore, should not be projected to a population to determine likely questioned costs. Cause: Per discussion with management, the School District believed that the expenditures were allowable as the expenditures were approved by GaDOE through the Consolidated Application process; however, they were not aware that contract amendments should be initiated prior to the expenditure of funds in this manner. Effect or Potential Effect: The School District is not in compliance with the Uniform Guidance, ED, or GaDOE guidance related to the ESSER program. Failure to ensure that appropriate policies and procedures are followed when expending federal funds may expose the School District to unnecessary financial strains and shortages as GaDOE may require the School District to return funds associated with unallowable expenditures. Recommendation: The School District should review current internal control procedures related to ESSER program expenditures. Where vulnerable, the School District should develop and/or modify its policies and procedures to ensure that expenditures are in line with provisions reflected within the associated contract and/or contract amendments. In addition, the School District should implement a monitoring process to ensure that all expenditures are compliant with the School District?s purchasing and employee compensation policies and procedures. Views of Responsible Officials: We concur with this finding.
(2022-025) Title: Internal control over automated SNAP eligibility determinations and benefit calculations needs improvement Prior Year Findings: None State Department: Health and Human Services State Bureau: Office for Family Independence Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Assistance Listing Title: SNAP Cluster (COVID-19) Assistance Listing Number: 10.551, 10.561 Federal Award Identification Number: SNAP Benefits, Maine Compliance Area: Allowable costs/cost principles Eligibility Special tests and provisions Type of Finding: Significant deficiency Questioned costs Known Questioned Costs: $2,952 Likely Questioned Costs: $7,686,166. Likely questioned costs were projected by dividing the known questioned costs in the sample by total authorized benefits tested to establish an error rate, then applying that error rate to total authorized benefits in fiscal year 2022. Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303; 2 CFR 200.403; 7 CFR 272.10; Families First Coronavirus Response Act (FFCRA) (Public Law 116-127), Section 2302 The Department must establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the Department is managing awards in compliance with Federal statues, regulations, and the terms and conditions of awards. To be allowable under Federal awards, costs must be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be adequately documented. 7 CFR 272.10 requires all State agencies to sufficiently automate their SNAP operations and computerize their systems for obtaining, maintaining, utilizing and transmitting information concerning SNAP. The FFCRA established emergency allotments for households participating in SNAP to provide temporary food needs at the applicable maximum allotment for the household size. Condition: The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) administered by the Office for Family Independence (OFI) provides monthly benefits to eligible households to purchase nutritious foods. OFI is required by Federal program regulations to utilize an automated information system for SNAP. The information system must maintain all casefile information necessary to properly process eligibility determinations and benefit computations. The Automated Client Eligibility System (ACES) is the information system used by OFI to automate SNAP operations. ACES relies on the maintenance of a complex framework of system rules to make eligibility determinations, benefit calculations, and notifications when redetermination or revalidation of client eligibility factors is warranted. The Office of the State Auditor (OSA) tested a sample of 60 cases to verify the accuracy of automated SNAP operations utilizing ACES. In two cases, ACES did not properly process casefile information related to social security income in system benefit calculations. Of the two cases, one case resulted in a monthly calculated benefit overpayment of $33 and one case resulted in a monthly calculated benefit overpayment of $2; however, both cases were paid accurate total monthly benefits due to the emergency allotment from the FFCRA which provided the maximum benefit amount for each case. Existing policies and procedures over the automated information system did not identify these errors in system benefit calculations. OSA?s audit procedures also identified one case where household countable assets were inaccurately entered into ACES by OFI personnel. The case should have been deemed ineligible based on household asset limits; however, the case received a monthly benefit amount of $234 for three months and $250 for nine months of fiscal year 2022. The Department does not review information entered into ACES prior to SNAP eligibility determinations and benefit calculations. Known questioned costs total $2,952. OSA selected a non-statistical random sample. OSA issued two other related findings: 2022-082, Internal control over the eligibility determination process needs improvement; and 2022-083, improvement. over needs Context: In fiscal year 2022, the State provided approximately 119,000 SNAP eligible clients with $466 million in Federal benefits. Cause: ? Lack of adequate policies and procedures ? Lack of supervisory oversight Effect: ? Known questioned costs ? Potential future questioned costs and disallowances ? Noncompliance with Federal regulations Recommendation: We recommend that the Department implement additional policies and procedures to ensure that: ? automated eligibility determinations and benefit calculations are processed in accordance with Federal regulations, and ? case information entered into ACES is accurate. Corrective Action Plan: See F-12 Management?s Response: The Department partially agrees with this finding. The Department acknowledges that errors were made in three cases out of the sample of sixty reviewed. However, the Department disagrees with the calculation of the payment error in the third case. Asset limits were eliminated for all categorically eligible households effective January 1, 2022, as part of SNAP rule #212. Therefore, the known questioned costs should only be $1,452. There is an incorrect reference in the condition, in two cases the income type is state supplement income which is issued by the Department and not the Social Security Administration. The Department will continue to review its standard operating procedures to identify opportunities for improvement. Contact: Anthony Pelotte, Director, Office for Family Independence, DHHS, 207-624-4104 Auditor?s Concluding Remarks: OSA recognizes that categorically eligible household asset limits were eliminated by a State SNAP rule change effective January 1, 2022, based on guidance from the U.S. Department of Agriculture?s Food and Nutrition Service. In the third case noted in Management?s Response above, OFI is incorrectly applying the rule change. The change in eligibility criteria is only applicable to new determinations or redeterminations; therefore, in the case identified by OSA, the applicant would have had to apply for redetermination subsequent to the rule change in order for the asset limitation to be exempted from the eligibility determination process. OSA?s calculation of questioned costs totaling $2,952 for all fiscal year 2022 benefits related to this case is accurate. In regard to the incorrect reference noted in Management?s Response, OFI contends that ?information related to social security income? is an incorrect reference in the Condition; however, OSA maintains that the reference is correct and refers to State Supplemental Payments paid to eligible recipients of social security income. The reference as written, or as OFI suggests, does not change the deficiency reported by OSA which identified that controls relied upon in the automated information system did not identify errors in benefit calculations related to this income component. The finding remains as stated. (State Number: 22-1108-06)
(2022-026) Title: Internal control over the issuance of SNAP benefits needs improvement Prior Year Findings: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table State Department: Health and Human Services State Bureau: Office for Family Independence Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Assistance Listing Title: SNAP Cluster (COVID-19) Assistance Listing Number: 10.551, 10.561 Federal Award Identification Number: SNAP Benefits, Maine Compliance Area: Allowable costs/cost principles Eligibility Type of Finding: Significant deficiency Questioned Costs: None Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303; 2 CFR 200.403 The Department must establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the Department is managing awards in compliance with Federal statues, regulations, and the terms and conditions of awards. To be allowable under Federal awards, costs must be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be adequately documented. Condition: The Department receives date of death (DOD) information from the Maine Center for Disease Control & Prevention (MeCDC) and the Social Security Administration (SSA) on a weekly basis. The Office of the State Auditor (OSA) obtained DOD information from MeCDC and compared it to clients who received Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits during fiscal year 2022. Of the cases that had benefit issuances after the client?s DOD, OSA identified 998 cases where SNAP benefits were issued in excess of 30 days following the client?s DOD. In 17 of the 998 cases, benefits were issued 140 days or more after the client?s DOD. In 4 of the 17 cases, MeCDC?s reported DOD did not match the DOD documented in the client?s eligibility system case file. Issuance of benefits to a deceased client does not necessarily result in unallowable program costs, as the issued benefits may not be expended. Context: In fiscal year 2022, the State provided approximately 119,000 SNAP clients with $466 million in Federal benefits. Of the 119,000 SNAP clients, 1,875 had a DOD in fiscal year 2022. Cause: ? Lack of adequate procedures ? Lack of supervisory oversight Effect: ? Benefits issued on behalf of deceased clients may go undetected, and may result in unallowable benefit transaction activity. ? Potential questioned costs and disallowances Recommendation: We recommend that the Department improve procedures to ensure that DOD information is received, reviewed, and updated in the eligibility system on a biweekly or monthly basis to prevent incorrect issuances of benefits. Corrective Action Plan: See F-13 Management?s Response: The Department partially agrees with this finding. The Department acknowledges the 17 exceptions cited, 4 of which also contained a data mismatch between our ACES system and Maine?s CDC DAVE system. However, it should be noted that although we agree with the specific exceptions cited, they represent only 17 cases or 0.9% out of a pool of approximately 1,875 deceased clients identified, well within a reasonable margin of error. The reference to 998 cases cited in the finding, where SNAP benefits were issued in excess of 30 days, is inconsistent with the 365-day requirement from FNS. It should be noted that language contained in 7 CFR 272.14(c)(1) only requires that states make a comparison of deceased matched data with no less frequency of once per year. Our date of death procedures includes weekly processing of discrepancy reports from federal agencies as well as monthly crosswalks between ACES and Maine?s CDC. Contact: Anthony Pelotte, Director, Office for Family Independence, DHHS, 207-624-4104 Auditor?s Concluding Remarks: The Department receives DOD information from MeCDC and the SSA on a weekly basis, and as noted in Management?s Response, has established policies and procedures that require crossmatching of SNAP client information with DOD information on a more frequent basis than the annual requirement cited above. The 17 cases noted as exceptions had benefits issued 140 days or more past DOD and represented the most egregious cases; however, a total of 998 cases were identified out of 1,875 deceased clients where benefits were issued more than 30 days after DOD. This represents 53% of deceased clients in fiscal year 2022 that should have been identified through weekly processing of discrepancy reports from the SSA and through the monthly data crossmatch between ACES and MeCDC. The established procedures are not effective in preventing incorrect issuances of benefits. The finding remains as stated. (State Number: 22-1108-04)