2022-002 Finding ? Federal Awards Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Federal Program: Coronavirus State and Local Recovery Funds AL Number: 21.027 Statement of Condition: Noncompliance and Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Compliance related to Allowable Costs. Criteria: Two expenses charged to the program were not properly supported in accordance with regulations. According to section 2 CFR 200.403, charges to Federal awards must be adequately documented. The Organization should have internal controls in place to comply with requirements of the award and federal requirements to ensure amounts charged to Federal awards are allowable, accurate and properly allocated. Context and Cause: The Organization was unable to locate two receipts of 25 expenditures tested under AL #21.027. Effect of Condition: The two expenditures tested were not adequately documented. Known Questioned Costs: $334 ? resulted in likely questioned costs greater than $25,000. Recommendation: The Organization should follow the Uniform Grant Guidance for Allowable Costs and their internal policy for retaining documentation related to federal expenditures. View of responsible officials: We concur with the finding and are implementing corrective action.
2022-002 Finding ? Federal Awards Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Federal Program: Coronavirus State and Local Recovery Funds AL Number: 21.027 Statement of Condition: Noncompliance and Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Compliance related to Allowable Costs. Criteria: Two expenses charged to the program were not properly supported in accordance with regulations. According to section 2 CFR 200.403, charges to Federal awards must be adequately documented. The Organization should have internal controls in place to comply with requirements of the award and federal requirements to ensure amounts charged to Federal awards are allowable, accurate and properly allocated. Context and Cause: The Organization was unable to locate two receipts of 25 expenditures tested under AL #21.027. Effect of Condition: The two expenditures tested were not adequately documented. Known Questioned Costs: $334 ? resulted in likely questioned costs greater than $25,000. Recommendation: The Organization should follow the Uniform Grant Guidance for Allowable Costs and their internal policy for retaining documentation related to federal expenditures. View of responsible officials: We concur with the finding and are implementing corrective action.
2022-006 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass Thru Entity: Oklahoma State Department of Education Program: School Improvement Grant (SIG) Assistance Listing: 84.377A Grant Period: Year ending June 30, 2022 Condition: Expenditures were paid without supporting invoices. Criteria: 2 CFR ?200.403 (g) Costs that meet general criteria in order to be allowable under federal awards must be adequately documented. Cause: Procedures in place did not detect keying error. Context: Sample of 18 expenditures from a population of 142. One expenditure did not have proper support for amount paid. No material questioned costs for fiscal year. Effect: Overclaimed funds Recommendation: Expenditures should not be paid without the proper supporting invoices. The District needs to ensure procedures are updated to ensure claims to be submitted are supported by proper invoices. Repeat Finding from Prior Year: No Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Federal Programs Director will review claim to invoice and coding prior to submitting to the State Department.
2022-003 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass Thru Entity: Oklahoma State Department of Education Program: COVID-19 Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listing: COVID-19- 84.425D & 84.425U Grant Period: Year ending June 30, 2022 Condition: Payroll related expenditures were not supported by terms of the employment contract. Criteria: 2 CFR ?200.403 (g) Costs that meet general criteria in order to be allowable under federal awards must be adequately documented. Cause: Employment contracts were not prepared based on actual contract days. Context: A sample of 40 expenditures totaling $1,546,887 was selected for audit from a population of $3,350,305. The test found 10 items that were not in compliance with questioned costs totaling $311,952. Effect: The expenditures may be disallowed. Recommendation: Payroll-related expenditures need to be supported by the term of the employment contract. Employment contracts need to include actual contract days and the total amount of pay for those days. Repeat Finding from Prior Year: No Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Due to lack of training and guidance the prior human resource director, did not complete contracts accurately and consistently. New human resource director has completed training. In addition, District has reviewed a portion of contracts from FY21 and all contracts for FY22 and implemented procedures to ensure amounts paid agree with contract terms. FY23 new procedures were in place at time contracts were written.
2022-003 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass Thru Entity: Oklahoma State Department of Education Program: COVID-19 Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listing: COVID-19- 84.425D & 84.425U Grant Period: Year ending June 30, 2022 Condition: Payroll related expenditures were not supported by terms of the employment contract. Criteria: 2 CFR ?200.403 (g) Costs that meet general criteria in order to be allowable under federal awards must be adequately documented. Cause: Employment contracts were not prepared based on actual contract days. Context: A sample of 40 expenditures totaling $1,546,887 was selected for audit from a population of $3,350,305. The test found 10 items that were not in compliance with questioned costs totaling $311,952. Effect: The expenditures may be disallowed. Recommendation: Payroll-related expenditures need to be supported by the term of the employment contract. Employment contracts need to include actual contract days and the total amount of pay for those days. Repeat Finding from Prior Year: No Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Due to lack of training and guidance the prior human resource director, did not complete contracts accurately and consistently. New human resource director has completed training. In addition, District has reviewed a portion of contracts from FY21 and all contracts for FY22 and implemented procedures to ensure amounts paid agree with contract terms. FY23 new procedures were in place at time contracts were written.
2022-003 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass Thru Entity: Oklahoma State Department of Education Program: COVID-19 Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listing: COVID-19- 84.425D & 84.425U Grant Period: Year ending June 30, 2022 Condition: Payroll related expenditures were not supported by terms of the employment contract. Criteria: 2 CFR ?200.403 (g) Costs that meet general criteria in order to be allowable under federal awards must be adequately documented. Cause: Employment contracts were not prepared based on actual contract days. Context: A sample of 40 expenditures totaling $1,546,887 was selected for audit from a population of $3,350,305. The test found 10 items that were not in compliance with questioned costs totaling $311,952. Effect: The expenditures may be disallowed. Recommendation: Payroll-related expenditures need to be supported by the term of the employment contract. Employment contracts need to include actual contract days and the total amount of pay for those days. Repeat Finding from Prior Year: No Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Due to lack of training and guidance the prior human resource director, did not complete contracts accurately and consistently. New human resource director has completed training. In addition, District has reviewed a portion of contracts from FY21 and all contracts for FY22 and implemented procedures to ensure amounts paid agree with contract terms. FY23 new procedures were in place at time contracts were written.
FINDING 2022-003 Information on the federal program: Subject: Special Education Cluster - Earmarking Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants ALN: 84.027, 84.173 Federal Award Numbers and Years: 19611-045-PN01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking Audit Findings: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must:(a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)...." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards:? (g) Be adequately documented.... " 2 CFR 200.208(b) states in part: "The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may adjust specific Federal award conditions as needed . . ." 511 IAC 7-34-7(b) states: "The public agency, in providing special education and related services to students in nonpublic schools must expend at least an amount that is the same proportion of the public agency total subgrant under 20 U.S.C. 1411(f) as the number of nonpublic school students with disabilities, who are enrolled by their parents in nonpublic schools within its boundaries, is to the total number of students with disabilities of the same age range." Cause: The School Corporation's management had not developed an effective system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the earmarking requirements of the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system, as well as adequately document costs of federal awards, prevented the determination of the School Corporation?s compliance with the earmarking requirements of the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: The School Corporation is a member of the Northwest Indiana Special Education Cooperative (Cooperative). During fiscal years 2020-2021 and 2021-2022, the Cooperative operated the special education programs and spent the federal money on behalf of all its members. As the grant agreements were between the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE) and each member school, the School Corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. However, there was inadequate oversight performed by the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. The School Corporation did not have internal controls in place to ensure that the Cooperative complied with the earmarking requirements. The Cooperative did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that the required level of expenditures for non-public school students with disabilities was met for each member school. The Cooperative did not have effective internal controls to ensure non-public school expenditures were appropriately identified and reported. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance was isolated to the 19611-045-PN01 and 20611-045-PN01 grant awards.The Non-Public Proportionate Share expenditures for the 19611-045-PN01 grant award could not be verified for the individual member schools. The non-public school share funds for all member schools were comingled and the aggregate amount of expenditures was then allocated to the member schools on a percentage basis. These allocations were the amounts reported to IDOE. As such, we were unable to identify which expenditures were for each school in order to verify the minimum amount per the grant award was expended and properly reported to IDOE as required. The School Corporation?s minimum earmarking requirement for the 19611-045-PN01 grant award was $6,228. The Non-Public Proportionate Share expenditures for the 20611-045-PN01 and 21611-045-PN01 grant awards could not be verified for the individual member schools. The non-public school share funds for all member schools were comingled and the aggregate amount of expenditures was then allocated to the member schools on a percentage basis. These allocations were the amounts reported to IDOE. As such, we were unable to identify which expenditures were for each school in order to verify the minimum amount per the grant award was expended and properly reported to IDOE as required. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation?s management establish an effective system of internal controls, as well as appropriately document and identify federal award expenditures to ensure compliance with the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
FINDING 2022-003 Information on the federal program: Subject: Special Education Cluster - Earmarking Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants ALN: 84.027, 84.173 Federal Award Numbers and Years: 19611-045-PN01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking Audit Findings: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must:(a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)...." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards:? (g) Be adequately documented.... " 2 CFR 200.208(b) states in part: "The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may adjust specific Federal award conditions as needed . . ." 511 IAC 7-34-7(b) states: "The public agency, in providing special education and related services to students in nonpublic schools must expend at least an amount that is the same proportion of the public agency total subgrant under 20 U.S.C. 1411(f) as the number of nonpublic school students with disabilities, who are enrolled by their parents in nonpublic schools within its boundaries, is to the total number of students with disabilities of the same age range." Cause: The School Corporation's management had not developed an effective system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the earmarking requirements of the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system, as well as adequately document costs of federal awards, prevented the determination of the School Corporation?s compliance with the earmarking requirements of the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: The School Corporation is a member of the Northwest Indiana Special Education Cooperative (Cooperative). During fiscal years 2020-2021 and 2021-2022, the Cooperative operated the special education programs and spent the federal money on behalf of all its members. As the grant agreements were between the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE) and each member school, the School Corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. However, there was inadequate oversight performed by the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. The School Corporation did not have internal controls in place to ensure that the Cooperative complied with the earmarking requirements. The Cooperative did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that the required level of expenditures for non-public school students with disabilities was met for each member school. The Cooperative did not have effective internal controls to ensure non-public school expenditures were appropriately identified and reported. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance was isolated to the 19611-045-PN01 and 20611-045-PN01 grant awards.The Non-Public Proportionate Share expenditures for the 19611-045-PN01 grant award could not be verified for the individual member schools. The non-public school share funds for all member schools were comingled and the aggregate amount of expenditures was then allocated to the member schools on a percentage basis. These allocations were the amounts reported to IDOE. As such, we were unable to identify which expenditures were for each school in order to verify the minimum amount per the grant award was expended and properly reported to IDOE as required. The School Corporation?s minimum earmarking requirement for the 19611-045-PN01 grant award was $6,228. The Non-Public Proportionate Share expenditures for the 20611-045-PN01 and 21611-045-PN01 grant awards could not be verified for the individual member schools. The non-public school share funds for all member schools were comingled and the aggregate amount of expenditures was then allocated to the member schools on a percentage basis. These allocations were the amounts reported to IDOE. As such, we were unable to identify which expenditures were for each school in order to verify the minimum amount per the grant award was expended and properly reported to IDOE as required. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation?s management establish an effective system of internal controls, as well as appropriately document and identify federal award expenditures to ensure compliance with the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
FINDING 2022-003 Information on the federal program: Subject: Special Education Cluster - Earmarking Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants ALN: 84.027, 84.173 Federal Award Numbers and Years: 19611-045-PN01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking Audit Findings: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must:(a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)...." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards:? (g) Be adequately documented.... " 2 CFR 200.208(b) states in part: "The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may adjust specific Federal award conditions as needed . . ." 511 IAC 7-34-7(b) states: "The public agency, in providing special education and related services to students in nonpublic schools must expend at least an amount that is the same proportion of the public agency total subgrant under 20 U.S.C. 1411(f) as the number of nonpublic school students with disabilities, who are enrolled by their parents in nonpublic schools within its boundaries, is to the total number of students with disabilities of the same age range." Cause: The School Corporation's management had not developed an effective system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the earmarking requirements of the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system, as well as adequately document costs of federal awards, prevented the determination of the School Corporation?s compliance with the earmarking requirements of the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: The School Corporation is a member of the Northwest Indiana Special Education Cooperative (Cooperative). During fiscal years 2020-2021 and 2021-2022, the Cooperative operated the special education programs and spent the federal money on behalf of all its members. As the grant agreements were between the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE) and each member school, the School Corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. However, there was inadequate oversight performed by the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. The School Corporation did not have internal controls in place to ensure that the Cooperative complied with the earmarking requirements. The Cooperative did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that the required level of expenditures for non-public school students with disabilities was met for each member school. The Cooperative did not have effective internal controls to ensure non-public school expenditures were appropriately identified and reported. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance was isolated to the 19611-045-PN01 and 20611-045-PN01 grant awards.The Non-Public Proportionate Share expenditures for the 19611-045-PN01 grant award could not be verified for the individual member schools. The non-public school share funds for all member schools were comingled and the aggregate amount of expenditures was then allocated to the member schools on a percentage basis. These allocations were the amounts reported to IDOE. As such, we were unable to identify which expenditures were for each school in order to verify the minimum amount per the grant award was expended and properly reported to IDOE as required. The School Corporation?s minimum earmarking requirement for the 19611-045-PN01 grant award was $6,228. The Non-Public Proportionate Share expenditures for the 20611-045-PN01 and 21611-045-PN01 grant awards could not be verified for the individual member schools. The non-public school share funds for all member schools were comingled and the aggregate amount of expenditures was then allocated to the member schools on a percentage basis. These allocations were the amounts reported to IDOE. As such, we were unable to identify which expenditures were for each school in order to verify the minimum amount per the grant award was expended and properly reported to IDOE as required. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation?s management establish an effective system of internal controls, as well as appropriately document and identify federal award expenditures to ensure compliance with the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
FINDING 2022-003 Information on the federal program: Subject: Special Education Cluster - Earmarking Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants ALN: 84.027, 84.173 Federal Award Numbers and Years: 19611-045-PN01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking Audit Findings: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must:(a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)...." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards:? (g) Be adequately documented.... " 2 CFR 200.208(b) states in part: "The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may adjust specific Federal award conditions as needed . . ." 511 IAC 7-34-7(b) states: "The public agency, in providing special education and related services to students in nonpublic schools must expend at least an amount that is the same proportion of the public agency total subgrant under 20 U.S.C. 1411(f) as the number of nonpublic school students with disabilities, who are enrolled by their parents in nonpublic schools within its boundaries, is to the total number of students with disabilities of the same age range." Cause: The School Corporation's management had not developed an effective system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the earmarking requirements of the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system, as well as adequately document costs of federal awards, prevented the determination of the School Corporation?s compliance with the earmarking requirements of the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: The School Corporation is a member of the Northwest Indiana Special Education Cooperative (Cooperative). During fiscal years 2020-2021 and 2021-2022, the Cooperative operated the special education programs and spent the federal money on behalf of all its members. As the grant agreements were between the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE) and each member school, the School Corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. However, there was inadequate oversight performed by the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. The School Corporation did not have internal controls in place to ensure that the Cooperative complied with the earmarking requirements. The Cooperative did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that the required level of expenditures for non-public school students with disabilities was met for each member school. The Cooperative did not have effective internal controls to ensure non-public school expenditures were appropriately identified and reported. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance was isolated to the 19611-045-PN01 and 20611-045-PN01 grant awards.The Non-Public Proportionate Share expenditures for the 19611-045-PN01 grant award could not be verified for the individual member schools. The non-public school share funds for all member schools were comingled and the aggregate amount of expenditures was then allocated to the member schools on a percentage basis. These allocations were the amounts reported to IDOE. As such, we were unable to identify which expenditures were for each school in order to verify the minimum amount per the grant award was expended and properly reported to IDOE as required. The School Corporation?s minimum earmarking requirement for the 19611-045-PN01 grant award was $6,228. The Non-Public Proportionate Share expenditures for the 20611-045-PN01 and 21611-045-PN01 grant awards could not be verified for the individual member schools. The non-public school share funds for all member schools were comingled and the aggregate amount of expenditures was then allocated to the member schools on a percentage basis. These allocations were the amounts reported to IDOE. As such, we were unable to identify which expenditures were for each school in order to verify the minimum amount per the grant award was expended and properly reported to IDOE as required. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation?s management establish an effective system of internal controls, as well as appropriately document and identify federal award expenditures to ensure compliance with the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
FINDING 2022-003 Information on the federal program: Subject: Special Education Cluster - Earmarking Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants ALN: 84.027, 84.173 Federal Award Numbers and Years: 19611-045-PN01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking Audit Findings: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must:(a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)...." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards:? (g) Be adequately documented.... " 2 CFR 200.208(b) states in part: "The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may adjust specific Federal award conditions as needed . . ." 511 IAC 7-34-7(b) states: "The public agency, in providing special education and related services to students in nonpublic schools must expend at least an amount that is the same proportion of the public agency total subgrant under 20 U.S.C. 1411(f) as the number of nonpublic school students with disabilities, who are enrolled by their parents in nonpublic schools within its boundaries, is to the total number of students with disabilities of the same age range." Cause: The School Corporation's management had not developed an effective system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the earmarking requirements of the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system, as well as adequately document costs of federal awards, prevented the determination of the School Corporation?s compliance with the earmarking requirements of the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: The School Corporation is a member of the Northwest Indiana Special Education Cooperative (Cooperative). During fiscal years 2020-2021 and 2021-2022, the Cooperative operated the special education programs and spent the federal money on behalf of all its members. As the grant agreements were between the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE) and each member school, the School Corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. However, there was inadequate oversight performed by the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. The School Corporation did not have internal controls in place to ensure that the Cooperative complied with the earmarking requirements. The Cooperative did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that the required level of expenditures for non-public school students with disabilities was met for each member school. The Cooperative did not have effective internal controls to ensure non-public school expenditures were appropriately identified and reported. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance was isolated to the 19611-045-PN01 and 20611-045-PN01 grant awards.The Non-Public Proportionate Share expenditures for the 19611-045-PN01 grant award could not be verified for the individual member schools. The non-public school share funds for all member schools were comingled and the aggregate amount of expenditures was then allocated to the member schools on a percentage basis. These allocations were the amounts reported to IDOE. As such, we were unable to identify which expenditures were for each school in order to verify the minimum amount per the grant award was expended and properly reported to IDOE as required. The School Corporation?s minimum earmarking requirement for the 19611-045-PN01 grant award was $6,228. The Non-Public Proportionate Share expenditures for the 20611-045-PN01 and 21611-045-PN01 grant awards could not be verified for the individual member schools. The non-public school share funds for all member schools were comingled and the aggregate amount of expenditures was then allocated to the member schools on a percentage basis. These allocations were the amounts reported to IDOE. As such, we were unable to identify which expenditures were for each school in order to verify the minimum amount per the grant award was expended and properly reported to IDOE as required. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation?s management establish an effective system of internal controls, as well as appropriately document and identify federal award expenditures to ensure compliance with the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
FINDING 2022-003 Information on the federal program: Subject: Special Education Cluster - Earmarking Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants ALN: 84.027, 84.173 Federal Award Numbers and Years: 19611-045-PN01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking Audit Findings: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must:(a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)...." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards:? (g) Be adequately documented.... " 2 CFR 200.208(b) states in part: "The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may adjust specific Federal award conditions as needed . . ." 511 IAC 7-34-7(b) states: "The public agency, in providing special education and related services to students in nonpublic schools must expend at least an amount that is the same proportion of the public agency total subgrant under 20 U.S.C. 1411(f) as the number of nonpublic school students with disabilities, who are enrolled by their parents in nonpublic schools within its boundaries, is to the total number of students with disabilities of the same age range." Cause: The School Corporation's management had not developed an effective system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the earmarking requirements of the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system, as well as adequately document costs of federal awards, prevented the determination of the School Corporation?s compliance with the earmarking requirements of the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: The School Corporation is a member of the Northwest Indiana Special Education Cooperative (Cooperative). During fiscal years 2020-2021 and 2021-2022, the Cooperative operated the special education programs and spent the federal money on behalf of all its members. As the grant agreements were between the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE) and each member school, the School Corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. However, there was inadequate oversight performed by the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. The School Corporation did not have internal controls in place to ensure that the Cooperative complied with the earmarking requirements. The Cooperative did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that the required level of expenditures for non-public school students with disabilities was met for each member school. The Cooperative did not have effective internal controls to ensure non-public school expenditures were appropriately identified and reported. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance was isolated to the 19611-045-PN01 and 20611-045-PN01 grant awards.The Non-Public Proportionate Share expenditures for the 19611-045-PN01 grant award could not be verified for the individual member schools. The non-public school share funds for all member schools were comingled and the aggregate amount of expenditures was then allocated to the member schools on a percentage basis. These allocations were the amounts reported to IDOE. As such, we were unable to identify which expenditures were for each school in order to verify the minimum amount per the grant award was expended and properly reported to IDOE as required. The School Corporation?s minimum earmarking requirement for the 19611-045-PN01 grant award was $6,228. The Non-Public Proportionate Share expenditures for the 20611-045-PN01 and 21611-045-PN01 grant awards could not be verified for the individual member schools. The non-public school share funds for all member schools were comingled and the aggregate amount of expenditures was then allocated to the member schools on a percentage basis. These allocations were the amounts reported to IDOE. As such, we were unable to identify which expenditures were for each school in order to verify the minimum amount per the grant award was expended and properly reported to IDOE as required. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation?s management establish an effective system of internal controls, as well as appropriately document and identify federal award expenditures to ensure compliance with the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
FINDING 2022-003 Information on the federal program: Subject: Special Education Cluster - Earmarking Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants ALN: 84.027, 84.173 Federal Award Numbers and Years: 19611-045-PN01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking Audit Findings: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must:(a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)...." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards:? (g) Be adequately documented.... " 2 CFR 200.208(b) states in part: "The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may adjust specific Federal award conditions as needed . . ." 511 IAC 7-34-7(b) states: "The public agency, in providing special education and related services to students in nonpublic schools must expend at least an amount that is the same proportion of the public agency total subgrant under 20 U.S.C. 1411(f) as the number of nonpublic school students with disabilities, who are enrolled by their parents in nonpublic schools within its boundaries, is to the total number of students with disabilities of the same age range." Cause: The School Corporation's management had not developed an effective system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the earmarking requirements of the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system, as well as adequately document costs of federal awards, prevented the determination of the School Corporation?s compliance with the earmarking requirements of the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: The School Corporation is a member of the Northwest Indiana Special Education Cooperative (Cooperative). During fiscal years 2020-2021 and 2021-2022, the Cooperative operated the special education programs and spent the federal money on behalf of all its members. As the grant agreements were between the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE) and each member school, the School Corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. However, there was inadequate oversight performed by the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. The School Corporation did not have internal controls in place to ensure that the Cooperative complied with the earmarking requirements. The Cooperative did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that the required level of expenditures for non-public school students with disabilities was met for each member school. The Cooperative did not have effective internal controls to ensure non-public school expenditures were appropriately identified and reported. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance was isolated to the 19611-045-PN01 and 20611-045-PN01 grant awards.The Non-Public Proportionate Share expenditures for the 19611-045-PN01 grant award could not be verified for the individual member schools. The non-public school share funds for all member schools were comingled and the aggregate amount of expenditures was then allocated to the member schools on a percentage basis. These allocations were the amounts reported to IDOE. As such, we were unable to identify which expenditures were for each school in order to verify the minimum amount per the grant award was expended and properly reported to IDOE as required. The School Corporation?s minimum earmarking requirement for the 19611-045-PN01 grant award was $6,228. The Non-Public Proportionate Share expenditures for the 20611-045-PN01 and 21611-045-PN01 grant awards could not be verified for the individual member schools. The non-public school share funds for all member schools were comingled and the aggregate amount of expenditures was then allocated to the member schools on a percentage basis. These allocations were the amounts reported to IDOE. As such, we were unable to identify which expenditures were for each school in order to verify the minimum amount per the grant award was expended and properly reported to IDOE as required. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation?s management establish an effective system of internal controls, as well as appropriately document and identify federal award expenditures to ensure compliance with the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
FINDING 2022-003 Information on the federal program: Subject: Special Education Cluster - Earmarking Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants ALN: 84.027, 84.173 Federal Award Numbers and Years: 19611-045-PN01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking Audit Findings: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must:(a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)...." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards:? (g) Be adequately documented.... " 2 CFR 200.208(b) states in part: "The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may adjust specific Federal award conditions as needed . . ." 511 IAC 7-34-7(b) states: "The public agency, in providing special education and related services to students in nonpublic schools must expend at least an amount that is the same proportion of the public agency total subgrant under 20 U.S.C. 1411(f) as the number of nonpublic school students with disabilities, who are enrolled by their parents in nonpublic schools within its boundaries, is to the total number of students with disabilities of the same age range." Cause: The School Corporation's management had not developed an effective system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the earmarking requirements of the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system, as well as adequately document costs of federal awards, prevented the determination of the School Corporation?s compliance with the earmarking requirements of the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: The School Corporation is a member of the Northwest Indiana Special Education Cooperative (Cooperative). During fiscal years 2020-2021 and 2021-2022, the Cooperative operated the special education programs and spent the federal money on behalf of all its members. As the grant agreements were between the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE) and each member school, the School Corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. However, there was inadequate oversight performed by the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. The School Corporation did not have internal controls in place to ensure that the Cooperative complied with the earmarking requirements. The Cooperative did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that the required level of expenditures for non-public school students with disabilities was met for each member school. The Cooperative did not have effective internal controls to ensure non-public school expenditures were appropriately identified and reported. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance was isolated to the 19611-045-PN01 and 20611-045-PN01 grant awards.The Non-Public Proportionate Share expenditures for the 19611-045-PN01 grant award could not be verified for the individual member schools. The non-public school share funds for all member schools were comingled and the aggregate amount of expenditures was then allocated to the member schools on a percentage basis. These allocations were the amounts reported to IDOE. As such, we were unable to identify which expenditures were for each school in order to verify the minimum amount per the grant award was expended and properly reported to IDOE as required. The School Corporation?s minimum earmarking requirement for the 19611-045-PN01 grant award was $6,228. The Non-Public Proportionate Share expenditures for the 20611-045-PN01 and 21611-045-PN01 grant awards could not be verified for the individual member schools. The non-public school share funds for all member schools were comingled and the aggregate amount of expenditures was then allocated to the member schools on a percentage basis. These allocations were the amounts reported to IDOE. As such, we were unable to identify which expenditures were for each school in order to verify the minimum amount per the grant award was expended and properly reported to IDOE as required. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation?s management establish an effective system of internal controls, as well as appropriately document and identify federal award expenditures to ensure compliance with the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
FINDING 2022-003 Information on the federal program: Subject: Special Education Cluster - Earmarking Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants ALN: 84.027, 84.173 Federal Award Numbers and Years: 19611-045-PN01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking Audit Findings: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must:(a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)...." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards:? (g) Be adequately documented.... " 2 CFR 200.208(b) states in part: "The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may adjust specific Federal award conditions as needed . . ." 511 IAC 7-34-7(b) states: "The public agency, in providing special education and related services to students in nonpublic schools must expend at least an amount that is the same proportion of the public agency total subgrant under 20 U.S.C. 1411(f) as the number of nonpublic school students with disabilities, who are enrolled by their parents in nonpublic schools within its boundaries, is to the total number of students with disabilities of the same age range." Cause: The School Corporation's management had not developed an effective system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the earmarking requirements of the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system, as well as adequately document costs of federal awards, prevented the determination of the School Corporation?s compliance with the earmarking requirements of the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: The School Corporation is a member of the Northwest Indiana Special Education Cooperative (Cooperative). During fiscal years 2020-2021 and 2021-2022, the Cooperative operated the special education programs and spent the federal money on behalf of all its members. As the grant agreements were between the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE) and each member school, the School Corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. However, there was inadequate oversight performed by the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. The School Corporation did not have internal controls in place to ensure that the Cooperative complied with the earmarking requirements. The Cooperative did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that the required level of expenditures for non-public school students with disabilities was met for each member school. The Cooperative did not have effective internal controls to ensure non-public school expenditures were appropriately identified and reported. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance was isolated to the 19611-045-PN01 and 20611-045-PN01 grant awards.The Non-Public Proportionate Share expenditures for the 19611-045-PN01 grant award could not be verified for the individual member schools. The non-public school share funds for all member schools were comingled and the aggregate amount of expenditures was then allocated to the member schools on a percentage basis. These allocations were the amounts reported to IDOE. As such, we were unable to identify which expenditures were for each school in order to verify the minimum amount per the grant award was expended and properly reported to IDOE as required. The School Corporation?s minimum earmarking requirement for the 19611-045-PN01 grant award was $6,228. The Non-Public Proportionate Share expenditures for the 20611-045-PN01 and 21611-045-PN01 grant awards could not be verified for the individual member schools. The non-public school share funds for all member schools were comingled and the aggregate amount of expenditures was then allocated to the member schools on a percentage basis. These allocations were the amounts reported to IDOE. As such, we were unable to identify which expenditures were for each school in order to verify the minimum amount per the grant award was expended and properly reported to IDOE as required. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation?s management establish an effective system of internal controls, as well as appropriately document and identify federal award expenditures to ensure compliance with the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
Finding #2022-002 ? Grant Program: Department of Transportation Airport Improvement Program ? Assistance Listing #20.106 Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.403(f), a cost is not allowable under a federal program if it is included as a cost or used to meet cost sharing or matching requirements of any other federally-financed program in either the current or a prior period. Condition & Context: As a result of our audit procedures, we noted amounts previously reimbursed for February through May 2020 payroll under AIP 69 (CARES Act) in the fiscal year ended June 30, 2020 were also reimbursed under AIP 73 (ARPA) during the year ended June 30, 2022. Cause: Lack of procedures related to monitoring and review of reimbursement requests. Effect: $414,761 of expenditures were removed from the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards. Additionally, an audit adjustment was proposed to adjust the previously reported grant revenue to deferred revenue as of June 30, 2022. Recommendation: We recommend management develop a system of reviewing and monitoring reimbursement requests to ensure that expenditures previously reimbursed under federal funding with similar allowable activities are not included in future requests. Management Response: See Corrective Action Plan.
United States Department of the Treasury Reference Number: 2022-006 Program: 21.023 COVID-19 Emergency Rental Assistance Federal Award Number: ERA-2101123208 and ERAE0280 Type of Finding: Noncompliance; Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls over Compliance Compliance Requirement: Eligibility Condition: Audit testing of a statistical sample of 40 cases processed during the period from September XX1, 2021 through June 30, 2022, revealed the following: ? Three cases revealed that three applicants received assistance in excess of the allowable maximum assistance resulting in overpayments of $11,225. Additionally, audit testing noted one of these applicants received an additional overpayment of $3,250 during the year ending June 30, 2023. The overpayments resulted from errors in applying statutorily established limits for rental assistance, duplicating assistance payments for the same months for one applicant, and the payment of a security deposit assistance in excess of one month?s rent. ? Three cases that received the correct amount of assistance were not processed in accordance with the program requirements. Specific supporting documentation required by the program guidelines was not obtained to support assistance payments. Criteria: The following summarizes the applicable portions of the ERA program requirements: ? United States Department of the Treasury Program FAQs updated July 6, 2022: ERA1 allows an eligible household to receive up to 12 months of assistance (plus an additional three (3) months if necessary to ensure housing stability for the household, subject to the availability of funds). ERA2 allows an eligible household to receive up to 15 months of assistance (plus an additional three (3) months if necessary to ensure housing stability for the household, subject to the availability of funds). The amount of a security deposit should not exceed one month?s rent, except in cases where a higher amount is reasonable and customary in the local housing market. DSHA?s ERA program design and guidelines limits security deposit assistance to one month?s rent. Grantees must establish policies and procedures to govern the implementation of their ERA programs consistent with the statutes and the ERA program requirements. ? 501(k)(3)(B) of Division N of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021, and 2 CFR 200.403 requires a grantee to confirm that the ERA1 assistance does not duplicate any other assistance, including federal, state, or local assistance provided for the same costs. Questioned Costs: Audit testing of 40 cases totaling $243,254 of assistance identified $11,295 of overpayments. Context: During the period of September 1, 2021 through June 30, 2022, DSHA approved and disbursed assistance for 9,986 cases totaling $64,082,208. Effect: Federal program expenditures of rental assistance were overpaid. Cause: Internal controls over compliance were not appropriately designed, implemented, or operated to appropriately address the risk of noncompliance with the federal program requirements. Recommendation: We recommend DSHA enhance its policies and procedures for processing rental assistance applications to ensure compliance with the federal program?s requirements.
Finding 2022-003 ? Material Weakness: Allowable Costs & Activities ? Compliance and Control Finding ALN 84.042 ? Student Support Services, 84.044 ? Talent Search and 84.047 ? Upward Bound ? TRIO Cluster Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-Through Entity: None ALN 47.076 ? Research and Development Cluster: National Science Foundation ?Missouri Louis Stokes Alliances for Minority Participation, Research Initiation Grant, and Entrepreneurship Federal Agency: National Science Foundation Pass-Through Entity: None ALN 84.031 ? Title III ? Higher Education ? Institutional Aid Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-Through Entity: None Criteria Or Specific Requirement: 2 CFR section 200.403 requires adequate documentation for allowable activities and costs and 2 CFR section 200.430(i)(1) requires charges to federal awards for salaries and wages be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. Condition: We noted through procedures performed that payroll costs were not supported with adequate documentation. Internal controls designed for these federal programs did not detect these errors. Cause: Controls over compliance put in place by management were not operating effectively as it relates to allowable costs and activities charged to the grants. Effect: Instances of noncompliance were not detected by management. Questioned Costs: TRIO Cluster - $40,361 of known questioned costs were identified in our testing sample. Likely questioned costs exceed $25,000. National Science Foundation - $24,744 of known questioned costs were identified in our testing sample. Likely questioned costs exceed $25,000. Title III - $34,906 of known questioned costs were identified in our testing sample. Likely questioned costs exceed $25,000. Context: TRIO Cluster - For a sample of 40 individual costs charged to the grant, 26 payroll items tested did not include adequate documentation. The University did not provide documentation to support the time and effort of each employee charged to the grant. National Science Foundation - For a sample of 40 individual costs charged to the grant, 24 payroll items tested did not include adequate documentation. The University did not provide documentation to support the time and effort of each employee charged to the grant. Title III - TRIO Cluster - For a sample of 40 individual costs charged to the grant, 21 payroll items tested did not include adequate documentation. The University did not provide documentation to support the time and effort of each employee charged to the grant. Identification As A Repeat Finding: 2021-003, 2021-008, 2021-015, 2020-003, and 2020-007 Recommendation: We recommend that management adjust its time-keeping process to verify that the amount of time charged to the grant is accurate and based on the employee?s time spent working on the grant. Internal controls over allowable costs and activities should ensure procedural improvements are implemented properly. Views Of Responsible Officials: The University is working with our third-party payroll provider to automate time and effort reporting. We are currently using paper forms for reporting until we can implement Time & Effort through ADP. The Director of Title III & Finance Compliance officer to further discuss time and effort.
Finding 2022-003 ? Material Weakness: Allowable Costs & Activities ? Compliance and Control Finding ALN 84.042 ? Student Support Services, 84.044 ? Talent Search and 84.047 ? Upward Bound ? TRIO Cluster Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-Through Entity: None ALN 47.076 ? Research and Development Cluster: National Science Foundation ?Missouri Louis Stokes Alliances for Minority Participation, Research Initiation Grant, and Entrepreneurship Federal Agency: National Science Foundation Pass-Through Entity: None ALN 84.031 ? Title III ? Higher Education ? Institutional Aid Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-Through Entity: None Criteria Or Specific Requirement: 2 CFR section 200.403 requires adequate documentation for allowable activities and costs and 2 CFR section 200.430(i)(1) requires charges to federal awards for salaries and wages be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. Condition: We noted through procedures performed that payroll costs were not supported with adequate documentation. Internal controls designed for these federal programs did not detect these errors. Cause: Controls over compliance put in place by management were not operating effectively as it relates to allowable costs and activities charged to the grants. Effect: Instances of noncompliance were not detected by management. Questioned Costs: TRIO Cluster - $40,361 of known questioned costs were identified in our testing sample. Likely questioned costs exceed $25,000. National Science Foundation - $24,744 of known questioned costs were identified in our testing sample. Likely questioned costs exceed $25,000. Title III - $34,906 of known questioned costs were identified in our testing sample. Likely questioned costs exceed $25,000. Context: TRIO Cluster - For a sample of 40 individual costs charged to the grant, 26 payroll items tested did not include adequate documentation. The University did not provide documentation to support the time and effort of each employee charged to the grant. National Science Foundation - For a sample of 40 individual costs charged to the grant, 24 payroll items tested did not include adequate documentation. The University did not provide documentation to support the time and effort of each employee charged to the grant. Title III - TRIO Cluster - For a sample of 40 individual costs charged to the grant, 21 payroll items tested did not include adequate documentation. The University did not provide documentation to support the time and effort of each employee charged to the grant. Identification As A Repeat Finding: 2021-003, 2021-008, 2021-015, 2020-003, and 2020-007 Recommendation: We recommend that management adjust its time-keeping process to verify that the amount of time charged to the grant is accurate and based on the employee?s time spent working on the grant. Internal controls over allowable costs and activities should ensure procedural improvements are implemented properly. Views Of Responsible Officials: The University is working with our third-party payroll provider to automate time and effort reporting. We are currently using paper forms for reporting until we can implement Time & Effort through ADP. The Director of Title III & Finance Compliance officer to further discuss time and effort.
Finding 2022-003 ? Material Weakness: Allowable Costs & Activities ? Compliance and Control Finding ALN 84.042 ? Student Support Services, 84.044 ? Talent Search and 84.047 ? Upward Bound ? TRIO Cluster Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-Through Entity: None ALN 47.076 ? Research and Development Cluster: National Science Foundation ?Missouri Louis Stokes Alliances for Minority Participation, Research Initiation Grant, and Entrepreneurship Federal Agency: National Science Foundation Pass-Through Entity: None ALN 84.031 ? Title III ? Higher Education ? Institutional Aid Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-Through Entity: None Criteria Or Specific Requirement: 2 CFR section 200.403 requires adequate documentation for allowable activities and costs and 2 CFR section 200.430(i)(1) requires charges to federal awards for salaries and wages be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. Condition: We noted through procedures performed that payroll costs were not supported with adequate documentation. Internal controls designed for these federal programs did not detect these errors. Cause: Controls over compliance put in place by management were not operating effectively as it relates to allowable costs and activities charged to the grants. Effect: Instances of noncompliance were not detected by management. Questioned Costs: TRIO Cluster - $40,361 of known questioned costs were identified in our testing sample. Likely questioned costs exceed $25,000. National Science Foundation - $24,744 of known questioned costs were identified in our testing sample. Likely questioned costs exceed $25,000. Title III - $34,906 of known questioned costs were identified in our testing sample. Likely questioned costs exceed $25,000. Context: TRIO Cluster - For a sample of 40 individual costs charged to the grant, 26 payroll items tested did not include adequate documentation. The University did not provide documentation to support the time and effort of each employee charged to the grant. National Science Foundation - For a sample of 40 individual costs charged to the grant, 24 payroll items tested did not include adequate documentation. The University did not provide documentation to support the time and effort of each employee charged to the grant. Title III - TRIO Cluster - For a sample of 40 individual costs charged to the grant, 21 payroll items tested did not include adequate documentation. The University did not provide documentation to support the time and effort of each employee charged to the grant. Identification As A Repeat Finding: 2021-003, 2021-008, 2021-015, 2020-003, and 2020-007 Recommendation: We recommend that management adjust its time-keeping process to verify that the amount of time charged to the grant is accurate and based on the employee?s time spent working on the grant. Internal controls over allowable costs and activities should ensure procedural improvements are implemented properly. Views Of Responsible Officials: The University is working with our third-party payroll provider to automate time and effort reporting. We are currently using paper forms for reporting until we can implement Time & Effort through ADP. The Director of Title III & Finance Compliance officer to further discuss time and effort.
Finding 2022-003 ? Material Weakness: Allowable Costs & Activities ? Compliance and Control Finding ALN 84.042 ? Student Support Services, 84.044 ? Talent Search and 84.047 ? Upward Bound ? TRIO Cluster Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-Through Entity: None ALN 47.076 ? Research and Development Cluster: National Science Foundation ?Missouri Louis Stokes Alliances for Minority Participation, Research Initiation Grant, and Entrepreneurship Federal Agency: National Science Foundation Pass-Through Entity: None ALN 84.031 ? Title III ? Higher Education ? Institutional Aid Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-Through Entity: None Criteria Or Specific Requirement: 2 CFR section 200.403 requires adequate documentation for allowable activities and costs and 2 CFR section 200.430(i)(1) requires charges to federal awards for salaries and wages be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. Condition: We noted through procedures performed that payroll costs were not supported with adequate documentation. Internal controls designed for these federal programs did not detect these errors. Cause: Controls over compliance put in place by management were not operating effectively as it relates to allowable costs and activities charged to the grants. Effect: Instances of noncompliance were not detected by management. Questioned Costs: TRIO Cluster - $40,361 of known questioned costs were identified in our testing sample. Likely questioned costs exceed $25,000. National Science Foundation - $24,744 of known questioned costs were identified in our testing sample. Likely questioned costs exceed $25,000. Title III - $34,906 of known questioned costs were identified in our testing sample. Likely questioned costs exceed $25,000. Context: TRIO Cluster - For a sample of 40 individual costs charged to the grant, 26 payroll items tested did not include adequate documentation. The University did not provide documentation to support the time and effort of each employee charged to the grant. National Science Foundation - For a sample of 40 individual costs charged to the grant, 24 payroll items tested did not include adequate documentation. The University did not provide documentation to support the time and effort of each employee charged to the grant. Title III - TRIO Cluster - For a sample of 40 individual costs charged to the grant, 21 payroll items tested did not include adequate documentation. The University did not provide documentation to support the time and effort of each employee charged to the grant. Identification As A Repeat Finding: 2021-003, 2021-008, 2021-015, 2020-003, and 2020-007 Recommendation: We recommend that management adjust its time-keeping process to verify that the amount of time charged to the grant is accurate and based on the employee?s time spent working on the grant. Internal controls over allowable costs and activities should ensure procedural improvements are implemented properly. Views Of Responsible Officials: The University is working with our third-party payroll provider to automate time and effort reporting. We are currently using paper forms for reporting until we can implement Time & Effort through ADP. The Director of Title III & Finance Compliance officer to further discuss time and effort.
Finding 2022-003 ? Material Weakness: Allowable Costs & Activities ? Compliance and Control Finding ALN 84.042 ? Student Support Services, 84.044 ? Talent Search and 84.047 ? Upward Bound ? TRIO Cluster Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-Through Entity: None ALN 47.076 ? Research and Development Cluster: National Science Foundation ?Missouri Louis Stokes Alliances for Minority Participation, Research Initiation Grant, and Entrepreneurship Federal Agency: National Science Foundation Pass-Through Entity: None ALN 84.031 ? Title III ? Higher Education ? Institutional Aid Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-Through Entity: None Criteria Or Specific Requirement: 2 CFR section 200.403 requires adequate documentation for allowable activities and costs and 2 CFR section 200.430(i)(1) requires charges to federal awards for salaries and wages be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. Condition: We noted through procedures performed that payroll costs were not supported with adequate documentation. Internal controls designed for these federal programs did not detect these errors. Cause: Controls over compliance put in place by management were not operating effectively as it relates to allowable costs and activities charged to the grants. Effect: Instances of noncompliance were not detected by management. Questioned Costs: TRIO Cluster - $40,361 of known questioned costs were identified in our testing sample. Likely questioned costs exceed $25,000. National Science Foundation - $24,744 of known questioned costs were identified in our testing sample. Likely questioned costs exceed $25,000. Title III - $34,906 of known questioned costs were identified in our testing sample. Likely questioned costs exceed $25,000. Context: TRIO Cluster - For a sample of 40 individual costs charged to the grant, 26 payroll items tested did not include adequate documentation. The University did not provide documentation to support the time and effort of each employee charged to the grant. National Science Foundation - For a sample of 40 individual costs charged to the grant, 24 payroll items tested did not include adequate documentation. The University did not provide documentation to support the time and effort of each employee charged to the grant. Title III - TRIO Cluster - For a sample of 40 individual costs charged to the grant, 21 payroll items tested did not include adequate documentation. The University did not provide documentation to support the time and effort of each employee charged to the grant. Identification As A Repeat Finding: 2021-003, 2021-008, 2021-015, 2020-003, and 2020-007 Recommendation: We recommend that management adjust its time-keeping process to verify that the amount of time charged to the grant is accurate and based on the employee?s time spent working on the grant. Internal controls over allowable costs and activities should ensure procedural improvements are implemented properly. Views Of Responsible Officials: The University is working with our third-party payroll provider to automate time and effort reporting. We are currently using paper forms for reporting until we can implement Time & Effort through ADP. The Director of Title III & Finance Compliance officer to further discuss time and effort.
Finding 2022-007 ? Material Weakness: Allowable Costs & Activities and Period of Performance? Compliance and Control Finding ALN 84.425F ? Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund (HEERF) Institutional Portion Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-Through Entity: None Criteria Or Specific Requirement: The Coronavirus Response and Relief Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2021 (CRRSAA) section 314(c )(1-3) notes that HEERF Institutional Portion funds are to be used to defray expenses associated with coronavirus or to carry out student support activities that address needs related to coronavirus. 2 CFR section 200.403 requires adequate documentation for allowable activities and costs and 2 CFR section 200.430(i)(1) requires charges to federal awards for salaries and wages be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. Condition: We noted through procedures performed that costs were not supported with adequate documentation. Internal controls designed for this federal program did not detect these errors. Cause: Controls over compliance put in place by management were not operating effectively as it relates to allowable costs and activities charged to the grant. Effect: Instances of noncompliance were not detected by management. Questioned Costs: $766,177 of known questioned costs were identified in our testing sample. Likely questioned costs exceed $25,000. Context: For a sample of 23 individual costs charged to the grant, 4 items tested, all payroll related, did not include adequate documentation. For the payroll items, the University did not provide documentation to support the time and effort of each student worker charged to the grant. For a sample of 23 individual costs charged to the grant, 7 items tested were utilized to cover costs related to building renovations and the associated project management. The documentation provided did not indicate that these costs were utilized to defray expenses associated with coronavirus. The control over compliance to ensure costs charged to the grant were allowable did not operate effectively. Statistical sampling was not used to test this compliance requirement. Identification As A Repeat Finding: 2021-010 Recommendation: We recommend that management review its processes and controls surrounding applicable compliance requirements to improve the existing system such that it will ensure compliance with the requirements of federal grants. In addition, we recommend that management adjust its time-keeping process to verify that the amount of time charged to the grant is accurate and based on the employee?s time spent working on the grant. Internal controls over allowable costs and activities should ensure procedural improvements are implemented properly. Views Of Responsible Officials: The University's current process is to collect and retain procurement documents for no less than five years. The institution will work to strengthen the current process in place relevant to securing adequate documentation. Supporting documentation was provided for data selection relating to the upgrades to the HVAC, ventilation, and the spacing of the academic facilities which were all completed in accordance with Covid guidelines. The University is working with our third-party payroll provider to automate time and effort reporting.. We are currently using paper forms for reporting until we can implement Time & Effort through ADP. The Director of Title III & Finance Compliance officer to further discuss time and effort.
Finding 2022-003 ? Material Weakness: Allowable Costs & Activities ? Compliance and Control Finding ALN 84.042 ? Student Support Services, 84.044 ? Talent Search and 84.047 ? Upward Bound ? TRIO Cluster Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-Through Entity: None ALN 47.076 ? Research and Development Cluster: National Science Foundation ?Missouri Louis Stokes Alliances for Minority Participation, Research Initiation Grant, and Entrepreneurship Federal Agency: National Science Foundation Pass-Through Entity: None ALN 84.031 ? Title III ? Higher Education ? Institutional Aid Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-Through Entity: None Criteria Or Specific Requirement: 2 CFR section 200.403 requires adequate documentation for allowable activities and costs and 2 CFR section 200.430(i)(1) requires charges to federal awards for salaries and wages be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. Condition: We noted through procedures performed that payroll costs were not supported with adequate documentation. Internal controls designed for these federal programs did not detect these errors. Cause: Controls over compliance put in place by management were not operating effectively as it relates to allowable costs and activities charged to the grants. Effect: Instances of noncompliance were not detected by management. Questioned Costs: TRIO Cluster - $40,361 of known questioned costs were identified in our testing sample. Likely questioned costs exceed $25,000. National Science Foundation - $24,744 of known questioned costs were identified in our testing sample. Likely questioned costs exceed $25,000. Title III - $34,906 of known questioned costs were identified in our testing sample. Likely questioned costs exceed $25,000. Context: TRIO Cluster - For a sample of 40 individual costs charged to the grant, 26 payroll items tested did not include adequate documentation. The University did not provide documentation to support the time and effort of each employee charged to the grant. National Science Foundation - For a sample of 40 individual costs charged to the grant, 24 payroll items tested did not include adequate documentation. The University did not provide documentation to support the time and effort of each employee charged to the grant. Title III - TRIO Cluster - For a sample of 40 individual costs charged to the grant, 21 payroll items tested did not include adequate documentation. The University did not provide documentation to support the time and effort of each employee charged to the grant. Identification As A Repeat Finding: 2021-003, 2021-008, 2021-015, 2020-003, and 2020-007 Recommendation: We recommend that management adjust its time-keeping process to verify that the amount of time charged to the grant is accurate and based on the employee?s time spent working on the grant. Internal controls over allowable costs and activities should ensure procedural improvements are implemented properly. Views Of Responsible Officials: The University is working with our third-party payroll provider to automate time and effort reporting. We are currently using paper forms for reporting until we can implement Time & Effort through ADP. The Director of Title III & Finance Compliance officer to further discuss time and effort.
Finding 2022-003 ? Material Weakness: Allowable Costs & Activities ? Compliance and Control Finding ALN 84.042 ? Student Support Services, 84.044 ? Talent Search and 84.047 ? Upward Bound ? TRIO Cluster Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-Through Entity: None ALN 47.076 ? Research and Development Cluster: National Science Foundation ?Missouri Louis Stokes Alliances for Minority Participation, Research Initiation Grant, and Entrepreneurship Federal Agency: National Science Foundation Pass-Through Entity: None ALN 84.031 ? Title III ? Higher Education ? Institutional Aid Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-Through Entity: None Criteria Or Specific Requirement: 2 CFR section 200.403 requires adequate documentation for allowable activities and costs and 2 CFR section 200.430(i)(1) requires charges to federal awards for salaries and wages be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. Condition: We noted through procedures performed that payroll costs were not supported with adequate documentation. Internal controls designed for these federal programs did not detect these errors. Cause: Controls over compliance put in place by management were not operating effectively as it relates to allowable costs and activities charged to the grants. Effect: Instances of noncompliance were not detected by management. Questioned Costs: TRIO Cluster - $40,361 of known questioned costs were identified in our testing sample. Likely questioned costs exceed $25,000. National Science Foundation - $24,744 of known questioned costs were identified in our testing sample. Likely questioned costs exceed $25,000. Title III - $34,906 of known questioned costs were identified in our testing sample. Likely questioned costs exceed $25,000. Context: TRIO Cluster - For a sample of 40 individual costs charged to the grant, 26 payroll items tested did not include adequate documentation. The University did not provide documentation to support the time and effort of each employee charged to the grant. National Science Foundation - For a sample of 40 individual costs charged to the grant, 24 payroll items tested did not include adequate documentation. The University did not provide documentation to support the time and effort of each employee charged to the grant. Title III - TRIO Cluster - For a sample of 40 individual costs charged to the grant, 21 payroll items tested did not include adequate documentation. The University did not provide documentation to support the time and effort of each employee charged to the grant. Identification As A Repeat Finding: 2021-003, 2021-008, 2021-015, 2020-003, and 2020-007 Recommendation: We recommend that management adjust its time-keeping process to verify that the amount of time charged to the grant is accurate and based on the employee?s time spent working on the grant. Internal controls over allowable costs and activities should ensure procedural improvements are implemented properly. Views Of Responsible Officials: The University is working with our third-party payroll provider to automate time and effort reporting. We are currently using paper forms for reporting until we can implement Time & Effort through ADP. The Director of Title III & Finance Compliance officer to further discuss time and effort.
Finding 2022-003 ? Material Weakness: Allowable Costs & Activities ? Compliance and Control Finding ALN 84.042 ? Student Support Services, 84.044 ? Talent Search and 84.047 ? Upward Bound ? TRIO Cluster Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-Through Entity: None ALN 47.076 ? Research and Development Cluster: National Science Foundation ?Missouri Louis Stokes Alliances for Minority Participation, Research Initiation Grant, and Entrepreneurship Federal Agency: National Science Foundation Pass-Through Entity: None ALN 84.031 ? Title III ? Higher Education ? Institutional Aid Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-Through Entity: None Criteria Or Specific Requirement: 2 CFR section 200.403 requires adequate documentation for allowable activities and costs and 2 CFR section 200.430(i)(1) requires charges to federal awards for salaries and wages be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. Condition: We noted through procedures performed that payroll costs were not supported with adequate documentation. Internal controls designed for these federal programs did not detect these errors. Cause: Controls over compliance put in place by management were not operating effectively as it relates to allowable costs and activities charged to the grants. Effect: Instances of noncompliance were not detected by management. Questioned Costs: TRIO Cluster - $40,361 of known questioned costs were identified in our testing sample. Likely questioned costs exceed $25,000. National Science Foundation - $24,744 of known questioned costs were identified in our testing sample. Likely questioned costs exceed $25,000. Title III - $34,906 of known questioned costs were identified in our testing sample. Likely questioned costs exceed $25,000. Context: TRIO Cluster - For a sample of 40 individual costs charged to the grant, 26 payroll items tested did not include adequate documentation. The University did not provide documentation to support the time and effort of each employee charged to the grant. National Science Foundation - For a sample of 40 individual costs charged to the grant, 24 payroll items tested did not include adequate documentation. The University did not provide documentation to support the time and effort of each employee charged to the grant. Title III - TRIO Cluster - For a sample of 40 individual costs charged to the grant, 21 payroll items tested did not include adequate documentation. The University did not provide documentation to support the time and effort of each employee charged to the grant. Identification As A Repeat Finding: 2021-003, 2021-008, 2021-015, 2020-003, and 2020-007 Recommendation: We recommend that management adjust its time-keeping process to verify that the amount of time charged to the grant is accurate and based on the employee?s time spent working on the grant. Internal controls over allowable costs and activities should ensure procedural improvements are implemented properly. Views Of Responsible Officials: The University is working with our third-party payroll provider to automate time and effort reporting. We are currently using paper forms for reporting until we can implement Time & Effort through ADP. The Director of Title III & Finance Compliance officer to further discuss time and effort.
FINDING 2022-002 Subject: Special Education Grants to States - Earmarking Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Special Education Grants to States Assistance Listings Number: 84.027 Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): 20611-130-PN01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not designed, nor implemented at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. Proportionate share is an amount of funds that must be expended on special education/related services for parentally-placed private school and homeschooled students. The amount to be spent is automatically calculated within each grant application. The School Corporation had not designed, nor implemented, policies and procedures to ensure that the required level of expenditures for non-public students was met for each grant. The Non-Public Proportionate Share expenditures for the 20611-130-PN01 grant were not spent in full, and the School Corporation did not file a waiver which if approved would have allowed the funds to be moved and spent under the regular Part B special education scope. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were isolated to the 20611-130-PN01 grant award. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 2 CFR 200.208(b) states in part: "The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may adjust specific Federal award conditions as needed . . ." 511 IAC 7-34-7(b) states: "The public agency, in providing special education and related services to students in nonpublic schools must expend at least an amount that is the same proportion of the public agency total subgrant under 20 U.S.C. 1411(f) as the number of nonpublic school students with disabilities, who are enrolled by their parents in nonpublic schools within its boundaries, is to the total number of students with disabilities of the same age range." Cause Management had not designed nor implemented a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. Effect The failure to establish an effective system of internal controls enabled noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement could result in the loss of future funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure compliance and comply with the grant agreement and the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-002 Subject: Special Education Grants to States - Earmarking Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Special Education Grants to States Assistance Listings Number: 84.027 Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): 20611-130-PN01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not designed, nor implemented at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. Proportionate share is an amount of funds that must be expended on special education/related services for parentally-placed private school and homeschooled students. The amount to be spent is automatically calculated within each grant application. The School Corporation had not designed, nor implemented, policies and procedures to ensure that the required level of expenditures for non-public students was met for each grant. The Non-Public Proportionate Share expenditures for the 20611-130-PN01 grant were not spent in full, and the School Corporation did not file a waiver which if approved would have allowed the funds to be moved and spent under the regular Part B special education scope. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were isolated to the 20611-130-PN01 grant award. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 2 CFR 200.208(b) states in part: "The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may adjust specific Federal award conditions as needed . . ." 511 IAC 7-34-7(b) states: "The public agency, in providing special education and related services to students in nonpublic schools must expend at least an amount that is the same proportion of the public agency total subgrant under 20 U.S.C. 1411(f) as the number of nonpublic school students with disabilities, who are enrolled by their parents in nonpublic schools within its boundaries, is to the total number of students with disabilities of the same age range." Cause Management had not designed nor implemented a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. Effect The failure to establish an effective system of internal controls enabled noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement could result in the loss of future funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure compliance and comply with the grant agreement and the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
2022-004 Unallowable Costs Federal Agency: US Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program Name: Child Care and Development Funds Block Grant (CCDF) - CRRSA (Coronavirus Response and Relieve Supplemental Act) Assistance Listing Number: 93.575 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: 2102NMCCC5 Award Period: 12/27/2020-09/30/2023 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance and Other Matters Criteria or Specific Requirement: 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart E: 200.403 (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. 200.403 (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. 200.405 Allocable to a particular Federal award or other cost objective if the goods or services involved are chargeable or assignable to that Federal award or cost objective in accordance with relative benefits received Condition: Out of 40 transactions tested, we identified 3 where the underlying support identified payments made to entities for teachers and staff that participate in HeadStart activities. Questioned Costs: $354,000 Context: We sampled 40 transactions. After bringing this to the Department's attention, the Grants Managers did perform a thorough assessment and accumulated all payments under this additional funding for this purpose. Cause: Program staff were allocating this additional funding to entities that have CCDF and Headstart programs. However, there was not appropriate tracking to separate the transactions and ensure they were charged to the correct federal programs. Effect: Costs associated with another federal program were charged to CCDF. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the program work closely with ASD to ensure expenditures are tracked and mapped to the appropriate federal award. Views of Responsible Officials: The Early Childhood Education and Care Department (ECECD) agrees with this audit finding and the ASD Director, CFO and Grants Manager will work with The Federal Program Team to develop formal policies and procedures for grant management to ensure compliance with programmatic grant requirements and track expenditures to ensure costs charged to grants are allowable, necessary, and reasonable. This will be completed by June 30, 2023.
2022-003 Department of Education Federal Financial Assistance Listing 84.425E, 84.425F, 84.425K Federal Award Numbers P425E201501, P425E201757, P425E200021, award year 2021 COVID-19 Education Stabilization Fund - Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund (HEERF) Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles and Period of Performance Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Material Noncompliance Criteria: The College is required to have procedures in place to ensure that federal awards are expended only for allowable costs in accordance with Subpart E ? Cost Principles of the Uniform Guidance. Allowable costs are supported by appropriate documentation and correctly charged as to account, amount, and period. 2 CFR 200.303(a) establishes that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides assurance that the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. 2 CFR 200.430(i) establishes the standards for documentation of personnel expenses including charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages. 2 CFR 200.403(h) establishes that costs must be incurred during the approved budget period. Condition: In our sample of expenditures selected for testing, we noted the following items; a) Through testing of operational expenditures of the College, it was determined; a. Payroll expenditures charged to the award were not for costs newly associated with the coronavirus, a requirement communicated within the supplemental guidance in the Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund III Frequently Asked Questions published May 11, 2021 and updated May 24, 2021. b) Through testing of disbursements to students, it was determined; a. No support could not be provided to substantiate a secondary level of review was completed prior to disbursement of funds. b. 26 instances identified in which the College directly controlled how student?s use their emergency financial aid grant. c. 8 instances identified in which college discharged outstanding balance on student account for costs incurred prior to March 13, 2020. d. 2 instances identified in which the College charged coronavirus vaccine incentive payments under the student portion of HEERF award. Cause: The College did not have a full understanding of the federal program requirements between HEERF I, II and III as it relates to Activities Allowed, Allowable Costs, and Period of Performance. Effect: The College?s controls did not detect or correct the errors identified, which resulted in disallowed costs charged to the federal awards. Questioned Costs: Total questioned costs of $2,219,674Context/Sampling: a) For operational expenditures of the College a nonstatistical sample of 60 expenditures was selected for testing, including 7 non-payroll expenditures out of approximately 50 non-payroll transactions, accounting for approximately $143,000 of $245,000 total non-payroll costs charged to the federal program, and 53 payroll expenditures out of approximately 6,700 payroll transactions, accounting for approximately $74,000 of $1,920,000 total payroll costs charged to the federal program. b) For disbursements to students of the College a nonstatistical sample of 60 expenditures was selected for testing, including 43 disbursements funded from institutional portion out of approximately 600, accounting for approximately $53,000 of $711,000 total disbursements to students funded through institutional portion charged to the federal program, and 17 disbursements funded from student portion out of approximately 400, accounting for approximately $74,000 of $246,000 total disbursements to students funded through student portion charged to the federal program. Repeat Finding from Prior Year: No Recommendation: We recommend management review procedures and control processes to comply with federal requirements noted above. Views of Responsible Officials: Management is in agreement with the finding.
2022-003 Department of Education Federal Financial Assistance Listing 84.425E, 84.425F, 84.425K Federal Award Numbers P425E201501, P425E201757, P425E200021, award year 2021 COVID-19 Education Stabilization Fund - Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund (HEERF) Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles and Period of Performance Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Material Noncompliance Criteria: The College is required to have procedures in place to ensure that federal awards are expended only for allowable costs in accordance with Subpart E ? Cost Principles of the Uniform Guidance. Allowable costs are supported by appropriate documentation and correctly charged as to account, amount, and period. 2 CFR 200.303(a) establishes that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides assurance that the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. 2 CFR 200.430(i) establishes the standards for documentation of personnel expenses including charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages. 2 CFR 200.403(h) establishes that costs must be incurred during the approved budget period. Condition: In our sample of expenditures selected for testing, we noted the following items; a) Through testing of operational expenditures of the College, it was determined; a. Payroll expenditures charged to the award were not for costs newly associated with the coronavirus, a requirement communicated within the supplemental guidance in the Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund III Frequently Asked Questions published May 11, 2021 and updated May 24, 2021. b) Through testing of disbursements to students, it was determined; a. No support could not be provided to substantiate a secondary level of review was completed prior to disbursement of funds. b. 26 instances identified in which the College directly controlled how student?s use their emergency financial aid grant. c. 8 instances identified in which college discharged outstanding balance on student account for costs incurred prior to March 13, 2020. d. 2 instances identified in which the College charged coronavirus vaccine incentive payments under the student portion of HEERF award. Cause: The College did not have a full understanding of the federal program requirements between HEERF I, II and III as it relates to Activities Allowed, Allowable Costs, and Period of Performance. Effect: The College?s controls did not detect or correct the errors identified, which resulted in disallowed costs charged to the federal awards. Questioned Costs: Total questioned costs of $2,219,674Context/Sampling: a) For operational expenditures of the College a nonstatistical sample of 60 expenditures was selected for testing, including 7 non-payroll expenditures out of approximately 50 non-payroll transactions, accounting for approximately $143,000 of $245,000 total non-payroll costs charged to the federal program, and 53 payroll expenditures out of approximately 6,700 payroll transactions, accounting for approximately $74,000 of $1,920,000 total payroll costs charged to the federal program. b) For disbursements to students of the College a nonstatistical sample of 60 expenditures was selected for testing, including 43 disbursements funded from institutional portion out of approximately 600, accounting for approximately $53,000 of $711,000 total disbursements to students funded through institutional portion charged to the federal program, and 17 disbursements funded from student portion out of approximately 400, accounting for approximately $74,000 of $246,000 total disbursements to students funded through student portion charged to the federal program. Repeat Finding from Prior Year: No Recommendation: We recommend management review procedures and control processes to comply with federal requirements noted above. Views of Responsible Officials: Management is in agreement with the finding.
2022-003 Department of Education Federal Financial Assistance Listing 84.425E, 84.425F, 84.425K Federal Award Numbers P425E201501, P425E201757, P425E200021, award year 2021 COVID-19 Education Stabilization Fund - Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund (HEERF) Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles and Period of Performance Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Material Noncompliance Criteria: The College is required to have procedures in place to ensure that federal awards are expended only for allowable costs in accordance with Subpart E ? Cost Principles of the Uniform Guidance. Allowable costs are supported by appropriate documentation and correctly charged as to account, amount, and period. 2 CFR 200.303(a) establishes that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides assurance that the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. 2 CFR 200.430(i) establishes the standards for documentation of personnel expenses including charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages. 2 CFR 200.403(h) establishes that costs must be incurred during the approved budget period. Condition: In our sample of expenditures selected for testing, we noted the following items; a) Through testing of operational expenditures of the College, it was determined; a. Payroll expenditures charged to the award were not for costs newly associated with the coronavirus, a requirement communicated within the supplemental guidance in the Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund III Frequently Asked Questions published May 11, 2021 and updated May 24, 2021. b) Through testing of disbursements to students, it was determined; a. No support could not be provided to substantiate a secondary level of review was completed prior to disbursement of funds. b. 26 instances identified in which the College directly controlled how student?s use their emergency financial aid grant. c. 8 instances identified in which college discharged outstanding balance on student account for costs incurred prior to March 13, 2020. d. 2 instances identified in which the College charged coronavirus vaccine incentive payments under the student portion of HEERF award. Cause: The College did not have a full understanding of the federal program requirements between HEERF I, II and III as it relates to Activities Allowed, Allowable Costs, and Period of Performance. Effect: The College?s controls did not detect or correct the errors identified, which resulted in disallowed costs charged to the federal awards. Questioned Costs: Total questioned costs of $2,219,674Context/Sampling: a) For operational expenditures of the College a nonstatistical sample of 60 expenditures was selected for testing, including 7 non-payroll expenditures out of approximately 50 non-payroll transactions, accounting for approximately $143,000 of $245,000 total non-payroll costs charged to the federal program, and 53 payroll expenditures out of approximately 6,700 payroll transactions, accounting for approximately $74,000 of $1,920,000 total payroll costs charged to the federal program. b) For disbursements to students of the College a nonstatistical sample of 60 expenditures was selected for testing, including 43 disbursements funded from institutional portion out of approximately 600, accounting for approximately $53,000 of $711,000 total disbursements to students funded through institutional portion charged to the federal program, and 17 disbursements funded from student portion out of approximately 400, accounting for approximately $74,000 of $246,000 total disbursements to students funded through student portion charged to the federal program. Repeat Finding from Prior Year: No Recommendation: We recommend management review procedures and control processes to comply with federal requirements noted above. Views of Responsible Officials: Management is in agreement with the finding.
FINDING 2022-003 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, COVID-19 - School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, COVID-19 - National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children, COVID-19 - Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 20/21, FY 21/22 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2020-003. Condition and Context A sample of 40 vendor disbursements from the School Lunch fund was selected for testing to verify the transactions were for allowable activities and costs. There were 3 of the 40 transactions, totaling $4,129, that were paid to vendors for which the School Corporation could not provide documentation to support the costs. As such, the 3 transactions could not be verified as an allowable activity or cost of the food service program and were considered questioned costs. Due to the number and magnitude of exceptions, per auditor judgment, we concluded it would not be appropriate to examine the remaining 29 disbursements. Additionally, the School Corporation incurred costs in the amount of $49,365 paid from the School Lunch fund for a vehicle used to distribute meals to students at the Indiana Department of Education approved meal sites during the COVID-19 pandemic shutdown. The School Corporation could not provide supporting documentation that prior written approval was received from the pass-through entity. Finally, in fiscal year 2021-2022, the School Corporation paid a portion of the Assistant Superintendent of Schools salary from the School Lunch fund without supporting documentation to support the percentage paid. The Assistant Superintendent of Schools spent time on federal program and nonfederal program activities, but did not maintain documentation of time spent on each activity. The total paid to the Assistant Superintendent of Schools from the School Lunch fund without proper documentation was $29,753. The costs that were not properly documented were considered questioned costs. The lack of internal controls, availability of supporting documentation, and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.333 states in part: "Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal entity records pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report or, for Federal awards that are renewed quarterly or annually, from the date of the submission of the quarterly or annual financial report, respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass through entity in the case of a subrecipient. . . ." 2 CFR 200.334 (Revised Uniform Guidance) states in part: "Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal entity records pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report or, for Federal awards that are renewed quarterly or annually, from the date of the submission of the quarterly or annual financial report, respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity in the case of a subrecipient. . . ." 7 CFR 220.7(e) states in part: ". . . the School Food Authority shall, with respect to participating schools under its jurisdiction: (1) (i) Maintain a nonprofit school food service; (ii) . . . use all revenues received by such food service only for the operation or improvement of that food service . . ." 7 CFR 210.14(a) states in part: ". . . Revenues received by the nonprofit school food service are to be used only for the operation or improvement of such food service, except that, such revenues shall not be used to purchase land or buildings, unless otherwise approved by FNS, or to construct buildings. . . ." 7 CFR 225.15(a)(1) states: "Sponsors shall operate the food service in accordance with: the provisions of this part; any instructions and handbooks issued by FNS under this part; and any instructions and handbooks issued by the State agency which are not inconsistent with the provisions of this part." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 2 CFR 200.439(b) states in part: "The following rules of allowability must apply to equipment and other capital expenditures: (1) Capital expenditures for general purpose equipment, buildings, and land are unallowable as direct charges, except with the prior written approval of the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity. . . ." 2 CFR 200.430(i) states in part: "Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses (1) Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: (i) Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated; (ii) Be incorporated into the official records of the non-Federal entity; (iii) Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non- Federal entity, not exceeding 100% of compensated activities (for IHE, this per the IHE's definition of IBS); . . . (vii) Support the distribution of the employee's salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and non-Federal award; an indirect cost activity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities which are allocated using different allocation bases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity. . . ." Cause Management had not established an effective system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance or that supporting documentation would have been maintained and made available for audit with the grant agreement and the Activities Allowed or Unallowed and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements. Effect The failure to establish an effective system of internal controls and retain and provide supporting documentation prevented the determination of the School Corporation's compliance with the compliance requirements listed above. The failure to design and implement an effective system of internal controls enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Activities Allowed or Unallowed and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs Known questioned costs of $83,247 were identified as detailed in the Condition and Context. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure that documentation will be maintained and made available for audit and to comply with the grant agreement and the Activities Allowed or Unallowed and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-003 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, COVID-19 - School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, COVID-19 - National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children, COVID-19 - Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 20/21, FY 21/22 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2020-003. Condition and Context A sample of 40 vendor disbursements from the School Lunch fund was selected for testing to verify the transactions were for allowable activities and costs. There were 3 of the 40 transactions, totaling $4,129, that were paid to vendors for which the School Corporation could not provide documentation to support the costs. As such, the 3 transactions could not be verified as an allowable activity or cost of the food service program and were considered questioned costs. Due to the number and magnitude of exceptions, per auditor judgment, we concluded it would not be appropriate to examine the remaining 29 disbursements. Additionally, the School Corporation incurred costs in the amount of $49,365 paid from the School Lunch fund for a vehicle used to distribute meals to students at the Indiana Department of Education approved meal sites during the COVID-19 pandemic shutdown. The School Corporation could not provide supporting documentation that prior written approval was received from the pass-through entity. Finally, in fiscal year 2021-2022, the School Corporation paid a portion of the Assistant Superintendent of Schools salary from the School Lunch fund without supporting documentation to support the percentage paid. The Assistant Superintendent of Schools spent time on federal program and nonfederal program activities, but did not maintain documentation of time spent on each activity. The total paid to the Assistant Superintendent of Schools from the School Lunch fund without proper documentation was $29,753. The costs that were not properly documented were considered questioned costs. The lack of internal controls, availability of supporting documentation, and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.333 states in part: "Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal entity records pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report or, for Federal awards that are renewed quarterly or annually, from the date of the submission of the quarterly or annual financial report, respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass through entity in the case of a subrecipient. . . ." 2 CFR 200.334 (Revised Uniform Guidance) states in part: "Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal entity records pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report or, for Federal awards that are renewed quarterly or annually, from the date of the submission of the quarterly or annual financial report, respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity in the case of a subrecipient. . . ." 7 CFR 220.7(e) states in part: ". . . the School Food Authority shall, with respect to participating schools under its jurisdiction: (1) (i) Maintain a nonprofit school food service; (ii) . . . use all revenues received by such food service only for the operation or improvement of that food service . . ." 7 CFR 210.14(a) states in part: ". . . Revenues received by the nonprofit school food service are to be used only for the operation or improvement of such food service, except that, such revenues shall not be used to purchase land or buildings, unless otherwise approved by FNS, or to construct buildings. . . ." 7 CFR 225.15(a)(1) states: "Sponsors shall operate the food service in accordance with: the provisions of this part; any instructions and handbooks issued by FNS under this part; and any instructions and handbooks issued by the State agency which are not inconsistent with the provisions of this part." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 2 CFR 200.439(b) states in part: "The following rules of allowability must apply to equipment and other capital expenditures: (1) Capital expenditures for general purpose equipment, buildings, and land are unallowable as direct charges, except with the prior written approval of the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity. . . ." 2 CFR 200.430(i) states in part: "Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses (1) Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: (i) Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated; (ii) Be incorporated into the official records of the non-Federal entity; (iii) Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non- Federal entity, not exceeding 100% of compensated activities (for IHE, this per the IHE's definition of IBS); . . . (vii) Support the distribution of the employee's salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and non-Federal award; an indirect cost activity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities which are allocated using different allocation bases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity. . . ." Cause Management had not established an effective system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance or that supporting documentation would have been maintained and made available for audit with the grant agreement and the Activities Allowed or Unallowed and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements. Effect The failure to establish an effective system of internal controls and retain and provide supporting documentation prevented the determination of the School Corporation's compliance with the compliance requirements listed above. The failure to design and implement an effective system of internal controls enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Activities Allowed or Unallowed and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs Known questioned costs of $83,247 were identified as detailed in the Condition and Context. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure that documentation will be maintained and made available for audit and to comply with the grant agreement and the Activities Allowed or Unallowed and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-003 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, COVID-19 - School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, COVID-19 - National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children, COVID-19 - Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 20/21, FY 21/22 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2020-003. Condition and Context A sample of 40 vendor disbursements from the School Lunch fund was selected for testing to verify the transactions were for allowable activities and costs. There were 3 of the 40 transactions, totaling $4,129, that were paid to vendors for which the School Corporation could not provide documentation to support the costs. As such, the 3 transactions could not be verified as an allowable activity or cost of the food service program and were considered questioned costs. Due to the number and magnitude of exceptions, per auditor judgment, we concluded it would not be appropriate to examine the remaining 29 disbursements. Additionally, the School Corporation incurred costs in the amount of $49,365 paid from the School Lunch fund for a vehicle used to distribute meals to students at the Indiana Department of Education approved meal sites during the COVID-19 pandemic shutdown. The School Corporation could not provide supporting documentation that prior written approval was received from the pass-through entity. Finally, in fiscal year 2021-2022, the School Corporation paid a portion of the Assistant Superintendent of Schools salary from the School Lunch fund without supporting documentation to support the percentage paid. The Assistant Superintendent of Schools spent time on federal program and nonfederal program activities, but did not maintain documentation of time spent on each activity. The total paid to the Assistant Superintendent of Schools from the School Lunch fund without proper documentation was $29,753. The costs that were not properly documented were considered questioned costs. The lack of internal controls, availability of supporting documentation, and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.333 states in part: "Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal entity records pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report or, for Federal awards that are renewed quarterly or annually, from the date of the submission of the quarterly or annual financial report, respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass through entity in the case of a subrecipient. . . ." 2 CFR 200.334 (Revised Uniform Guidance) states in part: "Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal entity records pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report or, for Federal awards that are renewed quarterly or annually, from the date of the submission of the quarterly or annual financial report, respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity in the case of a subrecipient. . . ." 7 CFR 220.7(e) states in part: ". . . the School Food Authority shall, with respect to participating schools under its jurisdiction: (1) (i) Maintain a nonprofit school food service; (ii) . . . use all revenues received by such food service only for the operation or improvement of that food service . . ." 7 CFR 210.14(a) states in part: ". . . Revenues received by the nonprofit school food service are to be used only for the operation or improvement of such food service, except that, such revenues shall not be used to purchase land or buildings, unless otherwise approved by FNS, or to construct buildings. . . ." 7 CFR 225.15(a)(1) states: "Sponsors shall operate the food service in accordance with: the provisions of this part; any instructions and handbooks issued by FNS under this part; and any instructions and handbooks issued by the State agency which are not inconsistent with the provisions of this part." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 2 CFR 200.439(b) states in part: "The following rules of allowability must apply to equipment and other capital expenditures: (1) Capital expenditures for general purpose equipment, buildings, and land are unallowable as direct charges, except with the prior written approval of the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity. . . ." 2 CFR 200.430(i) states in part: "Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses (1) Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: (i) Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated; (ii) Be incorporated into the official records of the non-Federal entity; (iii) Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non- Federal entity, not exceeding 100% of compensated activities (for IHE, this per the IHE's definition of IBS); . . . (vii) Support the distribution of the employee's salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and non-Federal award; an indirect cost activity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities which are allocated using different allocation bases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity. . . ." Cause Management had not established an effective system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance or that supporting documentation would have been maintained and made available for audit with the grant agreement and the Activities Allowed or Unallowed and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements. Effect The failure to establish an effective system of internal controls and retain and provide supporting documentation prevented the determination of the School Corporation's compliance with the compliance requirements listed above. The failure to design and implement an effective system of internal controls enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Activities Allowed or Unallowed and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs Known questioned costs of $83,247 were identified as detailed in the Condition and Context. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure that documentation will be maintained and made available for audit and to comply with the grant agreement and the Activities Allowed or Unallowed and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-003 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, COVID-19 - School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, COVID-19 - National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children, COVID-19 - Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 20/21, FY 21/22 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2020-003. Condition and Context A sample of 40 vendor disbursements from the School Lunch fund was selected for testing to verify the transactions were for allowable activities and costs. There were 3 of the 40 transactions, totaling $4,129, that were paid to vendors for which the School Corporation could not provide documentation to support the costs. As such, the 3 transactions could not be verified as an allowable activity or cost of the food service program and were considered questioned costs. Due to the number and magnitude of exceptions, per auditor judgment, we concluded it would not be appropriate to examine the remaining 29 disbursements. Additionally, the School Corporation incurred costs in the amount of $49,365 paid from the School Lunch fund for a vehicle used to distribute meals to students at the Indiana Department of Education approved meal sites during the COVID-19 pandemic shutdown. The School Corporation could not provide supporting documentation that prior written approval was received from the pass-through entity. Finally, in fiscal year 2021-2022, the School Corporation paid a portion of the Assistant Superintendent of Schools salary from the School Lunch fund without supporting documentation to support the percentage paid. The Assistant Superintendent of Schools spent time on federal program and nonfederal program activities, but did not maintain documentation of time spent on each activity. The total paid to the Assistant Superintendent of Schools from the School Lunch fund without proper documentation was $29,753. The costs that were not properly documented were considered questioned costs. The lack of internal controls, availability of supporting documentation, and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.333 states in part: "Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal entity records pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report or, for Federal awards that are renewed quarterly or annually, from the date of the submission of the quarterly or annual financial report, respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass through entity in the case of a subrecipient. . . ." 2 CFR 200.334 (Revised Uniform Guidance) states in part: "Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal entity records pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report or, for Federal awards that are renewed quarterly or annually, from the date of the submission of the quarterly or annual financial report, respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity in the case of a subrecipient. . . ." 7 CFR 220.7(e) states in part: ". . . the School Food Authority shall, with respect to participating schools under its jurisdiction: (1) (i) Maintain a nonprofit school food service; (ii) . . . use all revenues received by such food service only for the operation or improvement of that food service . . ." 7 CFR 210.14(a) states in part: ". . . Revenues received by the nonprofit school food service are to be used only for the operation or improvement of such food service, except that, such revenues shall not be used to purchase land or buildings, unless otherwise approved by FNS, or to construct buildings. . . ." 7 CFR 225.15(a)(1) states: "Sponsors shall operate the food service in accordance with: the provisions of this part; any instructions and handbooks issued by FNS under this part; and any instructions and handbooks issued by the State agency which are not inconsistent with the provisions of this part." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 2 CFR 200.439(b) states in part: "The following rules of allowability must apply to equipment and other capital expenditures: (1) Capital expenditures for general purpose equipment, buildings, and land are unallowable as direct charges, except with the prior written approval of the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity. . . ." 2 CFR 200.430(i) states in part: "Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses (1) Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: (i) Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated; (ii) Be incorporated into the official records of the non-Federal entity; (iii) Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non- Federal entity, not exceeding 100% of compensated activities (for IHE, this per the IHE's definition of IBS); . . . (vii) Support the distribution of the employee's salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and non-Federal award; an indirect cost activity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities which are allocated using different allocation bases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity. . . ." Cause Management had not established an effective system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance or that supporting documentation would have been maintained and made available for audit with the grant agreement and the Activities Allowed or Unallowed and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements. Effect The failure to establish an effective system of internal controls and retain and provide supporting documentation prevented the determination of the School Corporation's compliance with the compliance requirements listed above. The failure to design and implement an effective system of internal controls enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Activities Allowed or Unallowed and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs Known questioned costs of $83,247 were identified as detailed in the Condition and Context. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure that documentation will be maintained and made available for audit and to comply with the grant agreement and the Activities Allowed or Unallowed and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-003 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, COVID-19 - School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, COVID-19 - National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children, COVID-19 - Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 20/21, FY 21/22 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2020-003. Condition and Context A sample of 40 vendor disbursements from the School Lunch fund was selected for testing to verify the transactions were for allowable activities and costs. There were 3 of the 40 transactions, totaling $4,129, that were paid to vendors for which the School Corporation could not provide documentation to support the costs. As such, the 3 transactions could not be verified as an allowable activity or cost of the food service program and were considered questioned costs. Due to the number and magnitude of exceptions, per auditor judgment, we concluded it would not be appropriate to examine the remaining 29 disbursements. Additionally, the School Corporation incurred costs in the amount of $49,365 paid from the School Lunch fund for a vehicle used to distribute meals to students at the Indiana Department of Education approved meal sites during the COVID-19 pandemic shutdown. The School Corporation could not provide supporting documentation that prior written approval was received from the pass-through entity. Finally, in fiscal year 2021-2022, the School Corporation paid a portion of the Assistant Superintendent of Schools salary from the School Lunch fund without supporting documentation to support the percentage paid. The Assistant Superintendent of Schools spent time on federal program and nonfederal program activities, but did not maintain documentation of time spent on each activity. The total paid to the Assistant Superintendent of Schools from the School Lunch fund without proper documentation was $29,753. The costs that were not properly documented were considered questioned costs. The lack of internal controls, availability of supporting documentation, and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.333 states in part: "Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal entity records pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report or, for Federal awards that are renewed quarterly or annually, from the date of the submission of the quarterly or annual financial report, respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass through entity in the case of a subrecipient. . . ." 2 CFR 200.334 (Revised Uniform Guidance) states in part: "Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal entity records pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report or, for Federal awards that are renewed quarterly or annually, from the date of the submission of the quarterly or annual financial report, respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity in the case of a subrecipient. . . ." 7 CFR 220.7(e) states in part: ". . . the School Food Authority shall, with respect to participating schools under its jurisdiction: (1) (i) Maintain a nonprofit school food service; (ii) . . . use all revenues received by such food service only for the operation or improvement of that food service . . ." 7 CFR 210.14(a) states in part: ". . . Revenues received by the nonprofit school food service are to be used only for the operation or improvement of such food service, except that, such revenues shall not be used to purchase land or buildings, unless otherwise approved by FNS, or to construct buildings. . . ." 7 CFR 225.15(a)(1) states: "Sponsors shall operate the food service in accordance with: the provisions of this part; any instructions and handbooks issued by FNS under this part; and any instructions and handbooks issued by the State agency which are not inconsistent with the provisions of this part." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 2 CFR 200.439(b) states in part: "The following rules of allowability must apply to equipment and other capital expenditures: (1) Capital expenditures for general purpose equipment, buildings, and land are unallowable as direct charges, except with the prior written approval of the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity. . . ." 2 CFR 200.430(i) states in part: "Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses (1) Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: (i) Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated; (ii) Be incorporated into the official records of the non-Federal entity; (iii) Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non- Federal entity, not exceeding 100% of compensated activities (for IHE, this per the IHE's definition of IBS); . . . (vii) Support the distribution of the employee's salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and non-Federal award; an indirect cost activity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities which are allocated using different allocation bases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity. . . ." Cause Management had not established an effective system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance or that supporting documentation would have been maintained and made available for audit with the grant agreement and the Activities Allowed or Unallowed and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements. Effect The failure to establish an effective system of internal controls and retain and provide supporting documentation prevented the determination of the School Corporation's compliance with the compliance requirements listed above. The failure to design and implement an effective system of internal controls enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Activities Allowed or Unallowed and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs Known questioned costs of $83,247 were identified as detailed in the Condition and Context. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure that documentation will be maintained and made available for audit and to comply with the grant agreement and the Activities Allowed or Unallowed and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-003 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, COVID-19 - School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, COVID-19 - National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children, COVID-19 - Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 20/21, FY 21/22 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2020-003. Condition and Context A sample of 40 vendor disbursements from the School Lunch fund was selected for testing to verify the transactions were for allowable activities and costs. There were 3 of the 40 transactions, totaling $4,129, that were paid to vendors for which the School Corporation could not provide documentation to support the costs. As such, the 3 transactions could not be verified as an allowable activity or cost of the food service program and were considered questioned costs. Due to the number and magnitude of exceptions, per auditor judgment, we concluded it would not be appropriate to examine the remaining 29 disbursements. Additionally, the School Corporation incurred costs in the amount of $49,365 paid from the School Lunch fund for a vehicle used to distribute meals to students at the Indiana Department of Education approved meal sites during the COVID-19 pandemic shutdown. The School Corporation could not provide supporting documentation that prior written approval was received from the pass-through entity. Finally, in fiscal year 2021-2022, the School Corporation paid a portion of the Assistant Superintendent of Schools salary from the School Lunch fund without supporting documentation to support the percentage paid. The Assistant Superintendent of Schools spent time on federal program and nonfederal program activities, but did not maintain documentation of time spent on each activity. The total paid to the Assistant Superintendent of Schools from the School Lunch fund without proper documentation was $29,753. The costs that were not properly documented were considered questioned costs. The lack of internal controls, availability of supporting documentation, and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.333 states in part: "Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal entity records pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report or, for Federal awards that are renewed quarterly or annually, from the date of the submission of the quarterly or annual financial report, respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass through entity in the case of a subrecipient. . . ." 2 CFR 200.334 (Revised Uniform Guidance) states in part: "Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal entity records pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report or, for Federal awards that are renewed quarterly or annually, from the date of the submission of the quarterly or annual financial report, respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity in the case of a subrecipient. . . ." 7 CFR 220.7(e) states in part: ". . . the School Food Authority shall, with respect to participating schools under its jurisdiction: (1) (i) Maintain a nonprofit school food service; (ii) . . . use all revenues received by such food service only for the operation or improvement of that food service . . ." 7 CFR 210.14(a) states in part: ". . . Revenues received by the nonprofit school food service are to be used only for the operation or improvement of such food service, except that, such revenues shall not be used to purchase land or buildings, unless otherwise approved by FNS, or to construct buildings. . . ." 7 CFR 225.15(a)(1) states: "Sponsors shall operate the food service in accordance with: the provisions of this part; any instructions and handbooks issued by FNS under this part; and any instructions and handbooks issued by the State agency which are not inconsistent with the provisions of this part." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 2 CFR 200.439(b) states in part: "The following rules of allowability must apply to equipment and other capital expenditures: (1) Capital expenditures for general purpose equipment, buildings, and land are unallowable as direct charges, except with the prior written approval of the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity. . . ." 2 CFR 200.430(i) states in part: "Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses (1) Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: (i) Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated; (ii) Be incorporated into the official records of the non-Federal entity; (iii) Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non- Federal entity, not exceeding 100% of compensated activities (for IHE, this per the IHE's definition of IBS); . . . (vii) Support the distribution of the employee's salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and non-Federal award; an indirect cost activity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities which are allocated using different allocation bases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity. . . ." Cause Management had not established an effective system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance or that supporting documentation would have been maintained and made available for audit with the grant agreement and the Activities Allowed or Unallowed and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements. Effect The failure to establish an effective system of internal controls and retain and provide supporting documentation prevented the determination of the School Corporation's compliance with the compliance requirements listed above. The failure to design and implement an effective system of internal controls enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Activities Allowed or Unallowed and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs Known questioned costs of $83,247 were identified as detailed in the Condition and Context. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure that documentation will be maintained and made available for audit and to comply with the grant agreement and the Activities Allowed or Unallowed and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-003 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, COVID-19 - School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, COVID-19 - National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children, COVID-19 - Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 20/21, FY 21/22 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2020-003. Condition and Context A sample of 40 vendor disbursements from the School Lunch fund was selected for testing to verify the transactions were for allowable activities and costs. There were 3 of the 40 transactions, totaling $4,129, that were paid to vendors for which the School Corporation could not provide documentation to support the costs. As such, the 3 transactions could not be verified as an allowable activity or cost of the food service program and were considered questioned costs. Due to the number and magnitude of exceptions, per auditor judgment, we concluded it would not be appropriate to examine the remaining 29 disbursements. Additionally, the School Corporation incurred costs in the amount of $49,365 paid from the School Lunch fund for a vehicle used to distribute meals to students at the Indiana Department of Education approved meal sites during the COVID-19 pandemic shutdown. The School Corporation could not provide supporting documentation that prior written approval was received from the pass-through entity. Finally, in fiscal year 2021-2022, the School Corporation paid a portion of the Assistant Superintendent of Schools salary from the School Lunch fund without supporting documentation to support the percentage paid. The Assistant Superintendent of Schools spent time on federal program and nonfederal program activities, but did not maintain documentation of time spent on each activity. The total paid to the Assistant Superintendent of Schools from the School Lunch fund without proper documentation was $29,753. The costs that were not properly documented were considered questioned costs. The lack of internal controls, availability of supporting documentation, and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.333 states in part: "Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal entity records pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report or, for Federal awards that are renewed quarterly or annually, from the date of the submission of the quarterly or annual financial report, respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass through entity in the case of a subrecipient. . . ." 2 CFR 200.334 (Revised Uniform Guidance) states in part: "Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal entity records pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report or, for Federal awards that are renewed quarterly or annually, from the date of the submission of the quarterly or annual financial report, respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity in the case of a subrecipient. . . ." 7 CFR 220.7(e) states in part: ". . . the School Food Authority shall, with respect to participating schools under its jurisdiction: (1) (i) Maintain a nonprofit school food service; (ii) . . . use all revenues received by such food service only for the operation or improvement of that food service . . ." 7 CFR 210.14(a) states in part: ". . . Revenues received by the nonprofit school food service are to be used only for the operation or improvement of such food service, except that, such revenues shall not be used to purchase land or buildings, unless otherwise approved by FNS, or to construct buildings. . . ." 7 CFR 225.15(a)(1) states: "Sponsors shall operate the food service in accordance with: the provisions of this part; any instructions and handbooks issued by FNS under this part; and any instructions and handbooks issued by the State agency which are not inconsistent with the provisions of this part." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 2 CFR 200.439(b) states in part: "The following rules of allowability must apply to equipment and other capital expenditures: (1) Capital expenditures for general purpose equipment, buildings, and land are unallowable as direct charges, except with the prior written approval of the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity. . . ." 2 CFR 200.430(i) states in part: "Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses (1) Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: (i) Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated; (ii) Be incorporated into the official records of the non-Federal entity; (iii) Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non- Federal entity, not exceeding 100% of compensated activities (for IHE, this per the IHE's definition of IBS); . . . (vii) Support the distribution of the employee's salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and non-Federal award; an indirect cost activity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities which are allocated using different allocation bases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity. . . ." Cause Management had not established an effective system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance or that supporting documentation would have been maintained and made available for audit with the grant agreement and the Activities Allowed or Unallowed and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements. Effect The failure to establish an effective system of internal controls and retain and provide supporting documentation prevented the determination of the School Corporation's compliance with the compliance requirements listed above. The failure to design and implement an effective system of internal controls enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Activities Allowed or Unallowed and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs Known questioned costs of $83,247 were identified as detailed in the Condition and Context. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure that documentation will be maintained and made available for audit and to comply with the grant agreement and the Activities Allowed or Unallowed and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-003 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, COVID-19 - School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, COVID-19 - National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children, COVID-19 - Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 20/21, FY 21/22 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2020-003. Condition and Context A sample of 40 vendor disbursements from the School Lunch fund was selected for testing to verify the transactions were for allowable activities and costs. There were 3 of the 40 transactions, totaling $4,129, that were paid to vendors for which the School Corporation could not provide documentation to support the costs. As such, the 3 transactions could not be verified as an allowable activity or cost of the food service program and were considered questioned costs. Due to the number and magnitude of exceptions, per auditor judgment, we concluded it would not be appropriate to examine the remaining 29 disbursements. Additionally, the School Corporation incurred costs in the amount of $49,365 paid from the School Lunch fund for a vehicle used to distribute meals to students at the Indiana Department of Education approved meal sites during the COVID-19 pandemic shutdown. The School Corporation could not provide supporting documentation that prior written approval was received from the pass-through entity. Finally, in fiscal year 2021-2022, the School Corporation paid a portion of the Assistant Superintendent of Schools salary from the School Lunch fund without supporting documentation to support the percentage paid. The Assistant Superintendent of Schools spent time on federal program and nonfederal program activities, but did not maintain documentation of time spent on each activity. The total paid to the Assistant Superintendent of Schools from the School Lunch fund without proper documentation was $29,753. The costs that were not properly documented were considered questioned costs. The lack of internal controls, availability of supporting documentation, and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.333 states in part: "Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal entity records pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report or, for Federal awards that are renewed quarterly or annually, from the date of the submission of the quarterly or annual financial report, respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass through entity in the case of a subrecipient. . . ." 2 CFR 200.334 (Revised Uniform Guidance) states in part: "Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal entity records pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report or, for Federal awards that are renewed quarterly or annually, from the date of the submission of the quarterly or annual financial report, respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity in the case of a subrecipient. . . ." 7 CFR 220.7(e) states in part: ". . . the School Food Authority shall, with respect to participating schools under its jurisdiction: (1) (i) Maintain a nonprofit school food service; (ii) . . . use all revenues received by such food service only for the operation or improvement of that food service . . ." 7 CFR 210.14(a) states in part: ". . . Revenues received by the nonprofit school food service are to be used only for the operation or improvement of such food service, except that, such revenues shall not be used to purchase land or buildings, unless otherwise approved by FNS, or to construct buildings. . . ." 7 CFR 225.15(a)(1) states: "Sponsors shall operate the food service in accordance with: the provisions of this part; any instructions and handbooks issued by FNS under this part; and any instructions and handbooks issued by the State agency which are not inconsistent with the provisions of this part." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 2 CFR 200.439(b) states in part: "The following rules of allowability must apply to equipment and other capital expenditures: (1) Capital expenditures for general purpose equipment, buildings, and land are unallowable as direct charges, except with the prior written approval of the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity. . . ." 2 CFR 200.430(i) states in part: "Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses (1) Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: (i) Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated; (ii) Be incorporated into the official records of the non-Federal entity; (iii) Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non- Federal entity, not exceeding 100% of compensated activities (for IHE, this per the IHE's definition of IBS); . . . (vii) Support the distribution of the employee's salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and non-Federal award; an indirect cost activity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities which are allocated using different allocation bases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity. . . ." Cause Management had not established an effective system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance or that supporting documentation would have been maintained and made available for audit with the grant agreement and the Activities Allowed or Unallowed and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements. Effect The failure to establish an effective system of internal controls and retain and provide supporting documentation prevented the determination of the School Corporation's compliance with the compliance requirements listed above. The failure to design and implement an effective system of internal controls enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Activities Allowed or Unallowed and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs Known questioned costs of $83,247 were identified as detailed in the Condition and Context. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure that documentation will be maintained and made available for audit and to comply with the grant agreement and the Activities Allowed or Unallowed and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-003 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, COVID-19 - School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, COVID-19 - National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children, COVID-19 - Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 20/21, FY 21/22 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2020-003. Condition and Context A sample of 40 vendor disbursements from the School Lunch fund was selected for testing to verify the transactions were for allowable activities and costs. There were 3 of the 40 transactions, totaling $4,129, that were paid to vendors for which the School Corporation could not provide documentation to support the costs. As such, the 3 transactions could not be verified as an allowable activity or cost of the food service program and were considered questioned costs. Due to the number and magnitude of exceptions, per auditor judgment, we concluded it would not be appropriate to examine the remaining 29 disbursements. Additionally, the School Corporation incurred costs in the amount of $49,365 paid from the School Lunch fund for a vehicle used to distribute meals to students at the Indiana Department of Education approved meal sites during the COVID-19 pandemic shutdown. The School Corporation could not provide supporting documentation that prior written approval was received from the pass-through entity. Finally, in fiscal year 2021-2022, the School Corporation paid a portion of the Assistant Superintendent of Schools salary from the School Lunch fund without supporting documentation to support the percentage paid. The Assistant Superintendent of Schools spent time on federal program and nonfederal program activities, but did not maintain documentation of time spent on each activity. The total paid to the Assistant Superintendent of Schools from the School Lunch fund without proper documentation was $29,753. The costs that were not properly documented were considered questioned costs. The lack of internal controls, availability of supporting documentation, and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.333 states in part: "Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal entity records pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report or, for Federal awards that are renewed quarterly or annually, from the date of the submission of the quarterly or annual financial report, respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass through entity in the case of a subrecipient. . . ." 2 CFR 200.334 (Revised Uniform Guidance) states in part: "Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal entity records pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report or, for Federal awards that are renewed quarterly or annually, from the date of the submission of the quarterly or annual financial report, respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity in the case of a subrecipient. . . ." 7 CFR 220.7(e) states in part: ". . . the School Food Authority shall, with respect to participating schools under its jurisdiction: (1) (i) Maintain a nonprofit school food service; (ii) . . . use all revenues received by such food service only for the operation or improvement of that food service . . ." 7 CFR 210.14(a) states in part: ". . . Revenues received by the nonprofit school food service are to be used only for the operation or improvement of such food service, except that, such revenues shall not be used to purchase land or buildings, unless otherwise approved by FNS, or to construct buildings. . . ." 7 CFR 225.15(a)(1) states: "Sponsors shall operate the food service in accordance with: the provisions of this part; any instructions and handbooks issued by FNS under this part; and any instructions and handbooks issued by the State agency which are not inconsistent with the provisions of this part." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 2 CFR 200.439(b) states in part: "The following rules of allowability must apply to equipment and other capital expenditures: (1) Capital expenditures for general purpose equipment, buildings, and land are unallowable as direct charges, except with the prior written approval of the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity. . . ." 2 CFR 200.430(i) states in part: "Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses (1) Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: (i) Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated; (ii) Be incorporated into the official records of the non-Federal entity; (iii) Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non- Federal entity, not exceeding 100% of compensated activities (for IHE, this per the IHE's definition of IBS); . . . (vii) Support the distribution of the employee's salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and non-Federal award; an indirect cost activity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities which are allocated using different allocation bases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity. . . ." Cause Management had not established an effective system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance or that supporting documentation would have been maintained and made available for audit with the grant agreement and the Activities Allowed or Unallowed and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements. Effect The failure to establish an effective system of internal controls and retain and provide supporting documentation prevented the determination of the School Corporation's compliance with the compliance requirements listed above. The failure to design and implement an effective system of internal controls enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Activities Allowed or Unallowed and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs Known questioned costs of $83,247 were identified as detailed in the Condition and Context. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure that documentation will be maintained and made available for audit and to comply with the grant agreement and the Activities Allowed or Unallowed and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-008 Subject: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.425D, 84.425U Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425D200013, S425U210013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not designed or implemented at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Activities Allowed or Unallowed and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements. The School Corporation could not provide appropriate supporting documentation for 2 of 25 (8 percent) vendor disbursements selected for testing. Due to the lack of supporting documentation these disbursements were unable to be verified as allowable activities or costs. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.333 states in part: "Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal entity records pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report or, for Federal awards that are renewed quarterly or annually, from the date of the submission of the quarterly or annual financial report, respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass through entity in the case of a subrecipient. . . ." 2 CFR 200.334 (Revised Uniform Guidance) states in part: "Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal entity records pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report or, for Federal awards that are renewed quarterly or annually, from the date of the submission of the quarterly or annual financial report, respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity in the case of a subrecipient. . . ." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. (c) Be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally financed and other activities of the non-Federal entity. . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." Cause Management had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the Activities Allowed or Unallowed and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements. Effect The failure to establish an effective internal control system enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Activities Allowed or Unallowed and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements could result in the loss future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls and ensure documentation be maintained and made available for audit and to comply with the grant agreement and the Activities Allowed or Unallowed and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-008 Subject: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.425D, 84.425U Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425D200013, S425U210013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not designed or implemented at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Activities Allowed or Unallowed and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements. The School Corporation could not provide appropriate supporting documentation for 2 of 25 (8 percent) vendor disbursements selected for testing. Due to the lack of supporting documentation these disbursements were unable to be verified as allowable activities or costs. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.333 states in part: "Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal entity records pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report or, for Federal awards that are renewed quarterly or annually, from the date of the submission of the quarterly or annual financial report, respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass through entity in the case of a subrecipient. . . ." 2 CFR 200.334 (Revised Uniform Guidance) states in part: "Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal entity records pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report or, for Federal awards that are renewed quarterly or annually, from the date of the submission of the quarterly or annual financial report, respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity in the case of a subrecipient. . . ." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. (c) Be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally financed and other activities of the non-Federal entity. . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." Cause Management had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the Activities Allowed or Unallowed and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements. Effect The failure to establish an effective internal control system enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Activities Allowed or Unallowed and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements could result in the loss future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls and ensure documentation be maintained and made available for audit and to comply with the grant agreement and the Activities Allowed or Unallowed and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-008 Subject: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.425D, 84.425U Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425D200013, S425U210013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not designed or implemented at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Activities Allowed or Unallowed and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements. The School Corporation could not provide appropriate supporting documentation for 2 of 25 (8 percent) vendor disbursements selected for testing. Due to the lack of supporting documentation these disbursements were unable to be verified as allowable activities or costs. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.333 states in part: "Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal entity records pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report or, for Federal awards that are renewed quarterly or annually, from the date of the submission of the quarterly or annual financial report, respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass through entity in the case of a subrecipient. . . ." 2 CFR 200.334 (Revised Uniform Guidance) states in part: "Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal entity records pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report or, for Federal awards that are renewed quarterly or annually, from the date of the submission of the quarterly or annual financial report, respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity in the case of a subrecipient. . . ." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. (c) Be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally financed and other activities of the non-Federal entity. . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." Cause Management had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the Activities Allowed or Unallowed and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements. Effect The failure to establish an effective internal control system enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Activities Allowed or Unallowed and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements could result in the loss future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls and ensure documentation be maintained and made available for audit and to comply with the grant agreement and the Activities Allowed or Unallowed and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
Subject: Special Education Cluster - Earmarking Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.173 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 19611-047-PN01, 19619-047-PN01, 20611-045-PN01, 20619-045-PN01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context The School Corporation was a member of the Orange-Lawrence-Jackson-Martin-Greene Joint Services Cooperative (Cooperative). During fiscal year 2020-2021, the Cooperative operated the special education programs and spent the federal money on behalf of all its member schools. As the grant agreements were between the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE) and each member school, the school corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. However, there was inadequate oversight performed by the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. The School Corporation did not have internal controls in place to ensure that the Cooperative complied with the earmarking requirements. The Cooperative did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that the required level of expenditures for non-public school students with disabilities was met for each member school. The Cooperative did not have effective internal controls to ensure non-public school expenditures were appropriately identified and reported. The Non-Public Proportionate Share expenditures for the 19611-047-PN01, 19619-047-PN01, 20611-045-PN01, and 20619-045-PN01 grant awards could not be verified for the individual member schools. Proportionate Share Monitoring Reports and other supporting documentation for amounts reported to the IDOE for Earmarking were not retained for audit. As such, we were unable to identify if the minimum amount per the grant awards was expended and properly reported to the IDOE as required. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance applies to the 19611-047-PN01, 19619-047-PN01, 20611-045-PN01, and 20619-045-PN01 grant awards. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 17 BROWNSTOWN CENTRAL COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . . " 2 CFR 200.208(b) states in part: "The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may adjust specific Federal award conditions as needed. . . ." 511 IAC 7-34-7(b) states: "The public agency, in providing special education and related services to students in nonpublic schools must expend at least an amount that is the same proportion of the public agency total subgrant under 20 U.S.C. 1411(f) as the number of nonpublic school students with disabilities, who are enrolled by their parents in nonpublic schools within its boundaries, is to the total number of students with disabilities of the same age range." Cause The School Corporation's management had not developed an effective system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreements and the earmarking requirements of the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. Effect The failure to establish an effective internal control system, as well as adequately document costs of federal awards, prevented the determination of the School Corporation's compliance with the earmarking requirements of the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish an effective system of internal controls, as well as appropriately document and identify federal award expenditures to ensure compliance with the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
Subject: Special Education Cluster - Earmarking Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.173 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 19611-047-PN01, 19619-047-PN01, 20611-045-PN01, 20619-045-PN01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context The School Corporation was a member of the Orange-Lawrence-Jackson-Martin-Greene Joint Services Cooperative (Cooperative). During fiscal year 2020-2021, the Cooperative operated the special education programs and spent the federal money on behalf of all its member schools. As the grant agreements were between the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE) and each member school, the school corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. However, there was inadequate oversight performed by the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. The School Corporation did not have internal controls in place to ensure that the Cooperative complied with the earmarking requirements. The Cooperative did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that the required level of expenditures for non-public school students with disabilities was met for each member school. The Cooperative did not have effective internal controls to ensure non-public school expenditures were appropriately identified and reported. The Non-Public Proportionate Share expenditures for the 19611-047-PN01, 19619-047-PN01, 20611-045-PN01, and 20619-045-PN01 grant awards could not be verified for the individual member schools. Proportionate Share Monitoring Reports and other supporting documentation for amounts reported to the IDOE for Earmarking were not retained for audit. As such, we were unable to identify if the minimum amount per the grant awards was expended and properly reported to the IDOE as required. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance applies to the 19611-047-PN01, 19619-047-PN01, 20611-045-PN01, and 20619-045-PN01 grant awards. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 17 BROWNSTOWN CENTRAL COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . . " 2 CFR 200.208(b) states in part: "The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may adjust specific Federal award conditions as needed. . . ." 511 IAC 7-34-7(b) states: "The public agency, in providing special education and related services to students in nonpublic schools must expend at least an amount that is the same proportion of the public agency total subgrant under 20 U.S.C. 1411(f) as the number of nonpublic school students with disabilities, who are enrolled by their parents in nonpublic schools within its boundaries, is to the total number of students with disabilities of the same age range." Cause The School Corporation's management had not developed an effective system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreements and the earmarking requirements of the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. Effect The failure to establish an effective internal control system, as well as adequately document costs of federal awards, prevented the determination of the School Corporation's compliance with the earmarking requirements of the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish an effective system of internal controls, as well as appropriately document and identify federal award expenditures to ensure compliance with the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
Subject: Special Education Cluster - Earmarking Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.173 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 19611-047-PN01, 19619-047-PN01, 20611-045-PN01, 20619-045-PN01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context The School Corporation was a member of the Orange-Lawrence-Jackson-Martin-Greene Joint Services Cooperative (Cooperative). During fiscal year 2020-2021, the Cooperative operated the special education programs and spent the federal money on behalf of all its member schools. As the grant agreements were between the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE) and each member school, the school corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. However, there was inadequate oversight performed by the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. The School Corporation did not have internal controls in place to ensure that the Cooperative complied with the earmarking requirements. The Cooperative did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that the required level of expenditures for non-public school students with disabilities was met for each member school. The Cooperative did not have effective internal controls to ensure non-public school expenditures were appropriately identified and reported. The Non-Public Proportionate Share expenditures for the 19611-047-PN01, 19619-047-PN01, 20611-045-PN01, and 20619-045-PN01 grant awards could not be verified for the individual member schools. Proportionate Share Monitoring Reports and other supporting documentation for amounts reported to the IDOE for Earmarking were not retained for audit. As such, we were unable to identify if the minimum amount per the grant awards was expended and properly reported to the IDOE as required. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance applies to the 19611-047-PN01, 19619-047-PN01, 20611-045-PN01, and 20619-045-PN01 grant awards. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 17 BROWNSTOWN CENTRAL COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . . " 2 CFR 200.208(b) states in part: "The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may adjust specific Federal award conditions as needed. . . ." 511 IAC 7-34-7(b) states: "The public agency, in providing special education and related services to students in nonpublic schools must expend at least an amount that is the same proportion of the public agency total subgrant under 20 U.S.C. 1411(f) as the number of nonpublic school students with disabilities, who are enrolled by their parents in nonpublic schools within its boundaries, is to the total number of students with disabilities of the same age range." Cause The School Corporation's management had not developed an effective system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreements and the earmarking requirements of the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. Effect The failure to establish an effective internal control system, as well as adequately document costs of federal awards, prevented the determination of the School Corporation's compliance with the earmarking requirements of the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish an effective system of internal controls, as well as appropriately document and identify federal award expenditures to ensure compliance with the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
Subject: Special Education Cluster - Earmarking Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.173 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 19611-047-PN01, 19619-047-PN01, 20611-045-PN01, 20619-045-PN01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context The School Corporation was a member of the Orange-Lawrence-Jackson-Martin-Greene Joint Services Cooperative (Cooperative). During fiscal year 2020-2021, the Cooperative operated the special education programs and spent the federal money on behalf of all its member schools. As the grant agreements were between the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE) and each member school, the school corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. However, there was inadequate oversight performed by the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. The School Corporation did not have internal controls in place to ensure that the Cooperative complied with the earmarking requirements. The Cooperative did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that the required level of expenditures for non-public school students with disabilities was met for each member school. The Cooperative did not have effective internal controls to ensure non-public school expenditures were appropriately identified and reported. The Non-Public Proportionate Share expenditures for the 19611-047-PN01, 19619-047-PN01, 20611-045-PN01, and 20619-045-PN01 grant awards could not be verified for the individual member schools. Proportionate Share Monitoring Reports and other supporting documentation for amounts reported to the IDOE for Earmarking were not retained for audit. As such, we were unable to identify if the minimum amount per the grant awards was expended and properly reported to the IDOE as required. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance applies to the 19611-047-PN01, 19619-047-PN01, 20611-045-PN01, and 20619-045-PN01 grant awards. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 17 BROWNSTOWN CENTRAL COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . . " 2 CFR 200.208(b) states in part: "The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may adjust specific Federal award conditions as needed. . . ." 511 IAC 7-34-7(b) states: "The public agency, in providing special education and related services to students in nonpublic schools must expend at least an amount that is the same proportion of the public agency total subgrant under 20 U.S.C. 1411(f) as the number of nonpublic school students with disabilities, who are enrolled by their parents in nonpublic schools within its boundaries, is to the total number of students with disabilities of the same age range." Cause The School Corporation's management had not developed an effective system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreements and the earmarking requirements of the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. Effect The failure to establish an effective internal control system, as well as adequately document costs of federal awards, prevented the determination of the School Corporation's compliance with the earmarking requirements of the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish an effective system of internal controls, as well as appropriately document and identify federal award expenditures to ensure compliance with the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
Finding 2022-004 ? Unallowable Use of Public Housing Program Funds (Significant Deficiency, Non-compliance) Public Housing Program ? Assistance Listing No. 14.850a, Grant Period: Fiscal Year-End June 30, 2022 Criteria The cost principles in 2 CFR Part 200, Sub-part E of the Uniform Guidance describe allowable and unallowable uses of federal award program subsidies. Parts 200.403 and 200.405 prohibit the use of federal award program subsidies to fund expenditures outside of the applicable federal award program. Public Housing Program funds cannot be used to fund expenditures and/or deficits of other federal or non-federal programs. HUD Handbook 7475.1 defines allowable expenditures under Public Housing Program versus expenditures of the Central Office Cost Center (COCC). Equipment purchases of the COCC should not be charged to the Public Housing Program. Condition, Cause, Perspective and Questioned Costs During fiscal year 2022, the Authority charged the purchase of an administrative vehicle, in the amount of $35,256, to the Public Housing Program. Effect Non-compliance with federal requirements with respect to the Public Housing Program. Recommendation We recommend that the Authority review allowable Public Housing Program versus COCC expenditures in HUD Handbook 7575.1 and refrain from charging COCC expenditures to the Public Housing Program. Management?s Response The Authority review allowable Public Housing Program versus COCC expenditures in HUD Handbook 7575.1 and refrain from charging COCC expenditures to the Public Housing Program. The Authority?s Executive Director, Africa Porter, has assumed the responsibility of executing this corrective action as of April 1, 2023.
Program Information: AL #: 93.441 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Passed through California Rural Indian Health Board, Inc. Indian Health Services ? CRIHB 22, Indian Health Services ? CRIHB 21, COVID-19 Indian Health Services ? CRIHB 21 Award Numbers: 235-18-0004 Award Periods: 4/1/18-3/31/24 Criteria: 2 CFR ?200.403(h) states: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under federal awards: (g) be adequately documented." Condition/Context: During transactional testing the following was noted: ? 1 out of 1 IDC journal entry selection was lacking proper documented approvals of an authorized individual other than the preparer. [ ] Compliance Finding [ X ] Significant Deficiency [ ] Material Weakness Cause: There were ineffective controls in place during the period, along with lack of management oversight. Effect: Without additional review and approval, entries being made may have errors. Questioned Costs: Not applicable. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend that management establish controls and implement policies to ensure that support of approval is obtained and maintained for all expenditure transactions including journal entries. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared corrective action as detailed in its Corrective Action Plan.