Finding 2022 001 Federal Program Title ? Research & Development Cluster (R&D) Assistance Listing Nos. ? As listed on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Federal Agencies ? U.S. Department of Agriculture, U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Department of Defense, U.S. Department of Interior, U.S. Department of Justice, Department of State, U.S. Department of Transportation, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, National Endowment for the Humanities, National Science Foundation, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, U.S. Department of Energy, U.S. Department of Education, and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Award Numbers ? As listed on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Grant Award Periods ? Various Compliance Requirement ? Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Criteria: 2 CFR 200.430 includes the standards for documentation of personnel expenses. According to 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1), charges to federal awards for salary and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. Among other requirements within 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1), section (i) states records must be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated and section (v) states that the records must comply with established accounting policies and practices. Also, the HHS Grants Policy for educational institutions requires a plan confirmation system (system) for professorial and other professional staff members that is based on budgeted, planned, or assigned work activity and that is updated to reflect any significant changes in work distribution. The system must be incorporated into the organization?s official records and must identify activity applicable to each sponsored agreement and to each category needed to identify indirect costs and the functions to which they are allocable. At least annually, the employee, principal investigator, or responsible official will verify, by suitable means, that the work was performed and that the salaries and wages charged to sponsored agreements, whether as direct charges or in other categories of cost, are reasonable in relation to the work performed. A system, supported by after-the-fact activity reports, that reflects the distribution of covered employees? activity allocable to each grant and includes identification and recording of significant changes in work activity when initial charges were based on estimates. For professorial and other professional staff members, the activity reports will be prepared each academic term, but at least every 6 months. The University?s `Effort Reporting Policy? states ?Subjects must return the certified effort verification report no later than 30 calendar days after they have been distributed.? Additionally, as set forth in 2 CFR 200, the University is required to ensure allowable costs do not consist of improper payments, including payments that should not have been made or that were made in incorrect amounts (including overpayments and underpayments). Indirect costs are required to adhere to 2 CFR 200, Appendix III. Further, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official. Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and 45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: While performing procedures related to personnel expenses, we noted the University had not followed their `Effort Reporting Policy? which states ?Subjects must return the certified effort verification report no later than 30 calendar days after they have been distributed.? We noted two of our sixty sampled effort reports that had not been returned within the 30-calendar day policy. Total payroll and fringe totaled approximately $13,200,000 during fiscal year 2022. While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted three of forty sampled grants (totaling $3,385,750) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect object class that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class which resulted in overcharges during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 for a total overstatement of $1,888 as noted below: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Additionally, we noted indirect costs were overcharged for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $3,385,750) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect object class during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2021 that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class which resulted in overcharges. These overstatements were corrected during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 for a total of $18,377 as noted below: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2022 totaled approximately $8,360,000. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their `Cost Transfer Policy? which states ?Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis?. The University?s cost transfer policy defines timely as ?occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)?. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted thirty-two of our sixty-seven sampled cost transfers (totaling $3,153,441 positive and $2,900,348 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 581 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (21 were between 91 and 180 days past, 6 were between 181 and 270 days past, and 5 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers, we noted the following exceptions: We noted a transaction which was originally recorded to an incorrect object class that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class that did not allow F&A costs to be applied: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that exceeded the amount of the award resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Positive cost transfers were approximately $4,060,000 and negative cost transfers were $3,510,000 during fiscal year 2022. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with activities allowed/unallowed and allowable costs/cost principles. Questioned Cost: Questioned costs are not determinable. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2022, they continued reconciliation procedures related to `grant level? activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday in the previous fiscal year. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual R&D Cluster agreement as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2021 001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University take a fresh look at its processes, policies and internal controls to determine what is needed, post Workday implementation, to prevent and detect noncompliance with activities allowed and unallowed and adherence to allowable cost principles/cost principles. Additionally, we recommend the University determine and address the underlying root cause that is contributing to the volume of cost transfers and take necessary action to prevent unallowable costs from posting to the grant. We also recommend the University consider implementation of an automated control to ensure F&A is charged appropriately when cost transfer entries are made. Lastly, we recommend the University determine what additional Workday automated reporting is available to monitor compliance for personnel expenses, including effort verification reporting, F&A, etc. for activities allowed or unallowed and allowable costs/cost principles.
Finding 2022 001 Federal Program Title ? Research & Development Cluster (R&D) Assistance Listing Nos. ? As listed on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Federal Agencies ? U.S. Department of Agriculture, U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Department of Defense, U.S. Department of Interior, U.S. Department of Justice, Department of State, U.S. Department of Transportation, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, National Endowment for the Humanities, National Science Foundation, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, U.S. Department of Energy, U.S. Department of Education, and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Award Numbers ? As listed on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Grant Award Periods ? Various Compliance Requirement ? Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Criteria: 2 CFR 200.430 includes the standards for documentation of personnel expenses. According to 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1), charges to federal awards for salary and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. Among other requirements within 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1), section (i) states records must be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated and section (v) states that the records must comply with established accounting policies and practices. Also, the HHS Grants Policy for educational institutions requires a plan confirmation system (system) for professorial and other professional staff members that is based on budgeted, planned, or assigned work activity and that is updated to reflect any significant changes in work distribution. The system must be incorporated into the organization?s official records and must identify activity applicable to each sponsored agreement and to each category needed to identify indirect costs and the functions to which they are allocable. At least annually, the employee, principal investigator, or responsible official will verify, by suitable means, that the work was performed and that the salaries and wages charged to sponsored agreements, whether as direct charges or in other categories of cost, are reasonable in relation to the work performed. A system, supported by after-the-fact activity reports, that reflects the distribution of covered employees? activity allocable to each grant and includes identification and recording of significant changes in work activity when initial charges were based on estimates. For professorial and other professional staff members, the activity reports will be prepared each academic term, but at least every 6 months. The University?s `Effort Reporting Policy? states ?Subjects must return the certified effort verification report no later than 30 calendar days after they have been distributed.? Additionally, as set forth in 2 CFR 200, the University is required to ensure allowable costs do not consist of improper payments, including payments that should not have been made or that were made in incorrect amounts (including overpayments and underpayments). Indirect costs are required to adhere to 2 CFR 200, Appendix III. Further, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official. Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and 45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: While performing procedures related to personnel expenses, we noted the University had not followed their `Effort Reporting Policy? which states ?Subjects must return the certified effort verification report no later than 30 calendar days after they have been distributed.? We noted two of our sixty sampled effort reports that had not been returned within the 30-calendar day policy. Total payroll and fringe totaled approximately $13,200,000 during fiscal year 2022. While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted three of forty sampled grants (totaling $3,385,750) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect object class that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class which resulted in overcharges during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 for a total overstatement of $1,888 as noted below: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Additionally, we noted indirect costs were overcharged for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $3,385,750) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect object class during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2021 that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class which resulted in overcharges. These overstatements were corrected during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 for a total of $18,377 as noted below: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2022 totaled approximately $8,360,000. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their `Cost Transfer Policy? which states ?Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis?. The University?s cost transfer policy defines timely as ?occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)?. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted thirty-two of our sixty-seven sampled cost transfers (totaling $3,153,441 positive and $2,900,348 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 581 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (21 were between 91 and 180 days past, 6 were between 181 and 270 days past, and 5 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers, we noted the following exceptions: We noted a transaction which was originally recorded to an incorrect object class that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class that did not allow F&A costs to be applied: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that exceeded the amount of the award resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Positive cost transfers were approximately $4,060,000 and negative cost transfers were $3,510,000 during fiscal year 2022. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with activities allowed/unallowed and allowable costs/cost principles. Questioned Cost: Questioned costs are not determinable. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2022, they continued reconciliation procedures related to `grant level? activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday in the previous fiscal year. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual R&D Cluster agreement as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2021 001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University take a fresh look at its processes, policies and internal controls to determine what is needed, post Workday implementation, to prevent and detect noncompliance with activities allowed and unallowed and adherence to allowable cost principles/cost principles. Additionally, we recommend the University determine and address the underlying root cause that is contributing to the volume of cost transfers and take necessary action to prevent unallowable costs from posting to the grant. We also recommend the University consider implementation of an automated control to ensure F&A is charged appropriately when cost transfer entries are made. Lastly, we recommend the University determine what additional Workday automated reporting is available to monitor compliance for personnel expenses, including effort verification reporting, F&A, etc. for activities allowed or unallowed and allowable costs/cost principles.
Finding 2022 001 Federal Program Title ? Research & Development Cluster (R&D) Assistance Listing Nos. ? As listed on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Federal Agencies ? U.S. Department of Agriculture, U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Department of Defense, U.S. Department of Interior, U.S. Department of Justice, Department of State, U.S. Department of Transportation, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, National Endowment for the Humanities, National Science Foundation, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, U.S. Department of Energy, U.S. Department of Education, and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Award Numbers ? As listed on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Grant Award Periods ? Various Compliance Requirement ? Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Criteria: 2 CFR 200.430 includes the standards for documentation of personnel expenses. According to 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1), charges to federal awards for salary and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. Among other requirements within 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1), section (i) states records must be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated and section (v) states that the records must comply with established accounting policies and practices. Also, the HHS Grants Policy for educational institutions requires a plan confirmation system (system) for professorial and other professional staff members that is based on budgeted, planned, or assigned work activity and that is updated to reflect any significant changes in work distribution. The system must be incorporated into the organization?s official records and must identify activity applicable to each sponsored agreement and to each category needed to identify indirect costs and the functions to which they are allocable. At least annually, the employee, principal investigator, or responsible official will verify, by suitable means, that the work was performed and that the salaries and wages charged to sponsored agreements, whether as direct charges or in other categories of cost, are reasonable in relation to the work performed. A system, supported by after-the-fact activity reports, that reflects the distribution of covered employees? activity allocable to each grant and includes identification and recording of significant changes in work activity when initial charges were based on estimates. For professorial and other professional staff members, the activity reports will be prepared each academic term, but at least every 6 months. The University?s `Effort Reporting Policy? states ?Subjects must return the certified effort verification report no later than 30 calendar days after they have been distributed.? Additionally, as set forth in 2 CFR 200, the University is required to ensure allowable costs do not consist of improper payments, including payments that should not have been made or that were made in incorrect amounts (including overpayments and underpayments). Indirect costs are required to adhere to 2 CFR 200, Appendix III. Further, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official. Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and 45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: While performing procedures related to personnel expenses, we noted the University had not followed their `Effort Reporting Policy? which states ?Subjects must return the certified effort verification report no later than 30 calendar days after they have been distributed.? We noted two of our sixty sampled effort reports that had not been returned within the 30-calendar day policy. Total payroll and fringe totaled approximately $13,200,000 during fiscal year 2022. While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted three of forty sampled grants (totaling $3,385,750) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect object class that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class which resulted in overcharges during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 for a total overstatement of $1,888 as noted below: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Additionally, we noted indirect costs were overcharged for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $3,385,750) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect object class during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2021 that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class which resulted in overcharges. These overstatements were corrected during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 for a total of $18,377 as noted below: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2022 totaled approximately $8,360,000. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their `Cost Transfer Policy? which states ?Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis?. The University?s cost transfer policy defines timely as ?occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)?. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted thirty-two of our sixty-seven sampled cost transfers (totaling $3,153,441 positive and $2,900,348 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 581 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (21 were between 91 and 180 days past, 6 were between 181 and 270 days past, and 5 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers, we noted the following exceptions: We noted a transaction which was originally recorded to an incorrect object class that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class that did not allow F&A costs to be applied: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that exceeded the amount of the award resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Positive cost transfers were approximately $4,060,000 and negative cost transfers were $3,510,000 during fiscal year 2022. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with activities allowed/unallowed and allowable costs/cost principles. Questioned Cost: Questioned costs are not determinable. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2022, they continued reconciliation procedures related to `grant level? activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday in the previous fiscal year. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual R&D Cluster agreement as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2021 001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University take a fresh look at its processes, policies and internal controls to determine what is needed, post Workday implementation, to prevent and detect noncompliance with activities allowed and unallowed and adherence to allowable cost principles/cost principles. Additionally, we recommend the University determine and address the underlying root cause that is contributing to the volume of cost transfers and take necessary action to prevent unallowable costs from posting to the grant. We also recommend the University consider implementation of an automated control to ensure F&A is charged appropriately when cost transfer entries are made. Lastly, we recommend the University determine what additional Workday automated reporting is available to monitor compliance for personnel expenses, including effort verification reporting, F&A, etc. for activities allowed or unallowed and allowable costs/cost principles.
Finding 2022 001 Federal Program Title ? Research & Development Cluster (R&D) Assistance Listing Nos. ? As listed on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Federal Agencies ? U.S. Department of Agriculture, U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Department of Defense, U.S. Department of Interior, U.S. Department of Justice, Department of State, U.S. Department of Transportation, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, National Endowment for the Humanities, National Science Foundation, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, U.S. Department of Energy, U.S. Department of Education, and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Award Numbers ? As listed on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Grant Award Periods ? Various Compliance Requirement ? Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Criteria: 2 CFR 200.430 includes the standards for documentation of personnel expenses. According to 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1), charges to federal awards for salary and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. Among other requirements within 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1), section (i) states records must be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated and section (v) states that the records must comply with established accounting policies and practices. Also, the HHS Grants Policy for educational institutions requires a plan confirmation system (system) for professorial and other professional staff members that is based on budgeted, planned, or assigned work activity and that is updated to reflect any significant changes in work distribution. The system must be incorporated into the organization?s official records and must identify activity applicable to each sponsored agreement and to each category needed to identify indirect costs and the functions to which they are allocable. At least annually, the employee, principal investigator, or responsible official will verify, by suitable means, that the work was performed and that the salaries and wages charged to sponsored agreements, whether as direct charges or in other categories of cost, are reasonable in relation to the work performed. A system, supported by after-the-fact activity reports, that reflects the distribution of covered employees? activity allocable to each grant and includes identification and recording of significant changes in work activity when initial charges were based on estimates. For professorial and other professional staff members, the activity reports will be prepared each academic term, but at least every 6 months. The University?s `Effort Reporting Policy? states ?Subjects must return the certified effort verification report no later than 30 calendar days after they have been distributed.? Additionally, as set forth in 2 CFR 200, the University is required to ensure allowable costs do not consist of improper payments, including payments that should not have been made or that were made in incorrect amounts (including overpayments and underpayments). Indirect costs are required to adhere to 2 CFR 200, Appendix III. Further, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official. Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and 45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: While performing procedures related to personnel expenses, we noted the University had not followed their `Effort Reporting Policy? which states ?Subjects must return the certified effort verification report no later than 30 calendar days after they have been distributed.? We noted two of our sixty sampled effort reports that had not been returned within the 30-calendar day policy. Total payroll and fringe totaled approximately $13,200,000 during fiscal year 2022. While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted three of forty sampled grants (totaling $3,385,750) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect object class that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class which resulted in overcharges during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 for a total overstatement of $1,888 as noted below: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Additionally, we noted indirect costs were overcharged for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $3,385,750) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect object class during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2021 that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class which resulted in overcharges. These overstatements were corrected during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 for a total of $18,377 as noted below: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2022 totaled approximately $8,360,000. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their `Cost Transfer Policy? which states ?Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis?. The University?s cost transfer policy defines timely as ?occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)?. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted thirty-two of our sixty-seven sampled cost transfers (totaling $3,153,441 positive and $2,900,348 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 581 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (21 were between 91 and 180 days past, 6 were between 181 and 270 days past, and 5 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers, we noted the following exceptions: We noted a transaction which was originally recorded to an incorrect object class that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class that did not allow F&A costs to be applied: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that exceeded the amount of the award resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Positive cost transfers were approximately $4,060,000 and negative cost transfers were $3,510,000 during fiscal year 2022. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with activities allowed/unallowed and allowable costs/cost principles. Questioned Cost: Questioned costs are not determinable. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2022, they continued reconciliation procedures related to `grant level? activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday in the previous fiscal year. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual R&D Cluster agreement as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2021 001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University take a fresh look at its processes, policies and internal controls to determine what is needed, post Workday implementation, to prevent and detect noncompliance with activities allowed and unallowed and adherence to allowable cost principles/cost principles. Additionally, we recommend the University determine and address the underlying root cause that is contributing to the volume of cost transfers and take necessary action to prevent unallowable costs from posting to the grant. We also recommend the University consider implementation of an automated control to ensure F&A is charged appropriately when cost transfer entries are made. Lastly, we recommend the University determine what additional Workday automated reporting is available to monitor compliance for personnel expenses, including effort verification reporting, F&A, etc. for activities allowed or unallowed and allowable costs/cost principles.
Finding 2022 001 Federal Program Title ? Research & Development Cluster (R&D) Assistance Listing Nos. ? As listed on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Federal Agencies ? U.S. Department of Agriculture, U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Department of Defense, U.S. Department of Interior, U.S. Department of Justice, Department of State, U.S. Department of Transportation, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, National Endowment for the Humanities, National Science Foundation, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, U.S. Department of Energy, U.S. Department of Education, and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Award Numbers ? As listed on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Grant Award Periods ? Various Compliance Requirement ? Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Criteria: 2 CFR 200.430 includes the standards for documentation of personnel expenses. According to 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1), charges to federal awards for salary and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. Among other requirements within 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1), section (i) states records must be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated and section (v) states that the records must comply with established accounting policies and practices. Also, the HHS Grants Policy for educational institutions requires a plan confirmation system (system) for professorial and other professional staff members that is based on budgeted, planned, or assigned work activity and that is updated to reflect any significant changes in work distribution. The system must be incorporated into the organization?s official records and must identify activity applicable to each sponsored agreement and to each category needed to identify indirect costs and the functions to which they are allocable. At least annually, the employee, principal investigator, or responsible official will verify, by suitable means, that the work was performed and that the salaries and wages charged to sponsored agreements, whether as direct charges or in other categories of cost, are reasonable in relation to the work performed. A system, supported by after-the-fact activity reports, that reflects the distribution of covered employees? activity allocable to each grant and includes identification and recording of significant changes in work activity when initial charges were based on estimates. For professorial and other professional staff members, the activity reports will be prepared each academic term, but at least every 6 months. The University?s `Effort Reporting Policy? states ?Subjects must return the certified effort verification report no later than 30 calendar days after they have been distributed.? Additionally, as set forth in 2 CFR 200, the University is required to ensure allowable costs do not consist of improper payments, including payments that should not have been made or that were made in incorrect amounts (including overpayments and underpayments). Indirect costs are required to adhere to 2 CFR 200, Appendix III. Further, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official. Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and 45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: While performing procedures related to personnel expenses, we noted the University had not followed their `Effort Reporting Policy? which states ?Subjects must return the certified effort verification report no later than 30 calendar days after they have been distributed.? We noted two of our sixty sampled effort reports that had not been returned within the 30-calendar day policy. Total payroll and fringe totaled approximately $13,200,000 during fiscal year 2022. While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted three of forty sampled grants (totaling $3,385,750) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect object class that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class which resulted in overcharges during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 for a total overstatement of $1,888 as noted below: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Additionally, we noted indirect costs were overcharged for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $3,385,750) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect object class during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2021 that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class which resulted in overcharges. These overstatements were corrected during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 for a total of $18,377 as noted below: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2022 totaled approximately $8,360,000. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their `Cost Transfer Policy? which states ?Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis?. The University?s cost transfer policy defines timely as ?occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)?. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted thirty-two of our sixty-seven sampled cost transfers (totaling $3,153,441 positive and $2,900,348 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 581 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (21 were between 91 and 180 days past, 6 were between 181 and 270 days past, and 5 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers, we noted the following exceptions: We noted a transaction which was originally recorded to an incorrect object class that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class that did not allow F&A costs to be applied: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that exceeded the amount of the award resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Positive cost transfers were approximately $4,060,000 and negative cost transfers were $3,510,000 during fiscal year 2022. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with activities allowed/unallowed and allowable costs/cost principles. Questioned Cost: Questioned costs are not determinable. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2022, they continued reconciliation procedures related to `grant level? activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday in the previous fiscal year. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual R&D Cluster agreement as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2021 001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University take a fresh look at its processes, policies and internal controls to determine what is needed, post Workday implementation, to prevent and detect noncompliance with activities allowed and unallowed and adherence to allowable cost principles/cost principles. Additionally, we recommend the University determine and address the underlying root cause that is contributing to the volume of cost transfers and take necessary action to prevent unallowable costs from posting to the grant. We also recommend the University consider implementation of an automated control to ensure F&A is charged appropriately when cost transfer entries are made. Lastly, we recommend the University determine what additional Workday automated reporting is available to monitor compliance for personnel expenses, including effort verification reporting, F&A, etc. for activities allowed or unallowed and allowable costs/cost principles.
Finding 2022 001 Federal Program Title ? Research & Development Cluster (R&D) Assistance Listing Nos. ? As listed on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Federal Agencies ? U.S. Department of Agriculture, U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Department of Defense, U.S. Department of Interior, U.S. Department of Justice, Department of State, U.S. Department of Transportation, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, National Endowment for the Humanities, National Science Foundation, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, U.S. Department of Energy, U.S. Department of Education, and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Award Numbers ? As listed on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Grant Award Periods ? Various Compliance Requirement ? Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Criteria: 2 CFR 200.430 includes the standards for documentation of personnel expenses. According to 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1), charges to federal awards for salary and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. Among other requirements within 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1), section (i) states records must be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated and section (v) states that the records must comply with established accounting policies and practices. Also, the HHS Grants Policy for educational institutions requires a plan confirmation system (system) for professorial and other professional staff members that is based on budgeted, planned, or assigned work activity and that is updated to reflect any significant changes in work distribution. The system must be incorporated into the organization?s official records and must identify activity applicable to each sponsored agreement and to each category needed to identify indirect costs and the functions to which they are allocable. At least annually, the employee, principal investigator, or responsible official will verify, by suitable means, that the work was performed and that the salaries and wages charged to sponsored agreements, whether as direct charges or in other categories of cost, are reasonable in relation to the work performed. A system, supported by after-the-fact activity reports, that reflects the distribution of covered employees? activity allocable to each grant and includes identification and recording of significant changes in work activity when initial charges were based on estimates. For professorial and other professional staff members, the activity reports will be prepared each academic term, but at least every 6 months. The University?s `Effort Reporting Policy? states ?Subjects must return the certified effort verification report no later than 30 calendar days after they have been distributed.? Additionally, as set forth in 2 CFR 200, the University is required to ensure allowable costs do not consist of improper payments, including payments that should not have been made or that were made in incorrect amounts (including overpayments and underpayments). Indirect costs are required to adhere to 2 CFR 200, Appendix III. Further, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official. Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and 45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: While performing procedures related to personnel expenses, we noted the University had not followed their `Effort Reporting Policy? which states ?Subjects must return the certified effort verification report no later than 30 calendar days after they have been distributed.? We noted two of our sixty sampled effort reports that had not been returned within the 30-calendar day policy. Total payroll and fringe totaled approximately $13,200,000 during fiscal year 2022. While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted three of forty sampled grants (totaling $3,385,750) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect object class that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class which resulted in overcharges during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 for a total overstatement of $1,888 as noted below: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Additionally, we noted indirect costs were overcharged for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $3,385,750) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect object class during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2021 that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class which resulted in overcharges. These overstatements were corrected during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 for a total of $18,377 as noted below: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2022 totaled approximately $8,360,000. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their `Cost Transfer Policy? which states ?Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis?. The University?s cost transfer policy defines timely as ?occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)?. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted thirty-two of our sixty-seven sampled cost transfers (totaling $3,153,441 positive and $2,900,348 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 581 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (21 were between 91 and 180 days past, 6 were between 181 and 270 days past, and 5 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers, we noted the following exceptions: We noted a transaction which was originally recorded to an incorrect object class that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class that did not allow F&A costs to be applied: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that exceeded the amount of the award resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Positive cost transfers were approximately $4,060,000 and negative cost transfers were $3,510,000 during fiscal year 2022. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with activities allowed/unallowed and allowable costs/cost principles. Questioned Cost: Questioned costs are not determinable. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2022, they continued reconciliation procedures related to `grant level? activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday in the previous fiscal year. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual R&D Cluster agreement as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2021 001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University take a fresh look at its processes, policies and internal controls to determine what is needed, post Workday implementation, to prevent and detect noncompliance with activities allowed and unallowed and adherence to allowable cost principles/cost principles. Additionally, we recommend the University determine and address the underlying root cause that is contributing to the volume of cost transfers and take necessary action to prevent unallowable costs from posting to the grant. We also recommend the University consider implementation of an automated control to ensure F&A is charged appropriately when cost transfer entries are made. Lastly, we recommend the University determine what additional Workday automated reporting is available to monitor compliance for personnel expenses, including effort verification reporting, F&A, etc. for activities allowed or unallowed and allowable costs/cost principles.
Finding 2022 001 Federal Program Title ? Research & Development Cluster (R&D) Assistance Listing Nos. ? As listed on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Federal Agencies ? U.S. Department of Agriculture, U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Department of Defense, U.S. Department of Interior, U.S. Department of Justice, Department of State, U.S. Department of Transportation, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, National Endowment for the Humanities, National Science Foundation, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, U.S. Department of Energy, U.S. Department of Education, and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Award Numbers ? As listed on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Grant Award Periods ? Various Compliance Requirement ? Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Criteria: 2 CFR 200.430 includes the standards for documentation of personnel expenses. According to 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1), charges to federal awards for salary and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. Among other requirements within 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1), section (i) states records must be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated and section (v) states that the records must comply with established accounting policies and practices. Also, the HHS Grants Policy for educational institutions requires a plan confirmation system (system) for professorial and other professional staff members that is based on budgeted, planned, or assigned work activity and that is updated to reflect any significant changes in work distribution. The system must be incorporated into the organization?s official records and must identify activity applicable to each sponsored agreement and to each category needed to identify indirect costs and the functions to which they are allocable. At least annually, the employee, principal investigator, or responsible official will verify, by suitable means, that the work was performed and that the salaries and wages charged to sponsored agreements, whether as direct charges or in other categories of cost, are reasonable in relation to the work performed. A system, supported by after-the-fact activity reports, that reflects the distribution of covered employees? activity allocable to each grant and includes identification and recording of significant changes in work activity when initial charges were based on estimates. For professorial and other professional staff members, the activity reports will be prepared each academic term, but at least every 6 months. The University?s `Effort Reporting Policy? states ?Subjects must return the certified effort verification report no later than 30 calendar days after they have been distributed.? Additionally, as set forth in 2 CFR 200, the University is required to ensure allowable costs do not consist of improper payments, including payments that should not have been made or that were made in incorrect amounts (including overpayments and underpayments). Indirect costs are required to adhere to 2 CFR 200, Appendix III. Further, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official. Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and 45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: While performing procedures related to personnel expenses, we noted the University had not followed their `Effort Reporting Policy? which states ?Subjects must return the certified effort verification report no later than 30 calendar days after they have been distributed.? We noted two of our sixty sampled effort reports that had not been returned within the 30-calendar day policy. Total payroll and fringe totaled approximately $13,200,000 during fiscal year 2022. While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted three of forty sampled grants (totaling $3,385,750) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect object class that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class which resulted in overcharges during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 for a total overstatement of $1,888 as noted below: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Additionally, we noted indirect costs were overcharged for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $3,385,750) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect object class during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2021 that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class which resulted in overcharges. These overstatements were corrected during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 for a total of $18,377 as noted below: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2022 totaled approximately $8,360,000. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their `Cost Transfer Policy? which states ?Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis?. The University?s cost transfer policy defines timely as ?occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)?. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted thirty-two of our sixty-seven sampled cost transfers (totaling $3,153,441 positive and $2,900,348 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 581 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (21 were between 91 and 180 days past, 6 were between 181 and 270 days past, and 5 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers, we noted the following exceptions: We noted a transaction which was originally recorded to an incorrect object class that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class that did not allow F&A costs to be applied: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that exceeded the amount of the award resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Positive cost transfers were approximately $4,060,000 and negative cost transfers were $3,510,000 during fiscal year 2022. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with activities allowed/unallowed and allowable costs/cost principles. Questioned Cost: Questioned costs are not determinable. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2022, they continued reconciliation procedures related to `grant level? activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday in the previous fiscal year. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual R&D Cluster agreement as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2021 001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University take a fresh look at its processes, policies and internal controls to determine what is needed, post Workday implementation, to prevent and detect noncompliance with activities allowed and unallowed and adherence to allowable cost principles/cost principles. Additionally, we recommend the University determine and address the underlying root cause that is contributing to the volume of cost transfers and take necessary action to prevent unallowable costs from posting to the grant. We also recommend the University consider implementation of an automated control to ensure F&A is charged appropriately when cost transfer entries are made. Lastly, we recommend the University determine what additional Workday automated reporting is available to monitor compliance for personnel expenses, including effort verification reporting, F&A, etc. for activities allowed or unallowed and allowable costs/cost principles.
Finding 2022 001 Federal Program Title ? Research & Development Cluster (R&D) Assistance Listing Nos. ? As listed on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Federal Agencies ? U.S. Department of Agriculture, U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Department of Defense, U.S. Department of Interior, U.S. Department of Justice, Department of State, U.S. Department of Transportation, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, National Endowment for the Humanities, National Science Foundation, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, U.S. Department of Energy, U.S. Department of Education, and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Award Numbers ? As listed on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Grant Award Periods ? Various Compliance Requirement ? Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Criteria: 2 CFR 200.430 includes the standards for documentation of personnel expenses. According to 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1), charges to federal awards for salary and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. Among other requirements within 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1), section (i) states records must be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated and section (v) states that the records must comply with established accounting policies and practices. Also, the HHS Grants Policy for educational institutions requires a plan confirmation system (system) for professorial and other professional staff members that is based on budgeted, planned, or assigned work activity and that is updated to reflect any significant changes in work distribution. The system must be incorporated into the organization?s official records and must identify activity applicable to each sponsored agreement and to each category needed to identify indirect costs and the functions to which they are allocable. At least annually, the employee, principal investigator, or responsible official will verify, by suitable means, that the work was performed and that the salaries and wages charged to sponsored agreements, whether as direct charges or in other categories of cost, are reasonable in relation to the work performed. A system, supported by after-the-fact activity reports, that reflects the distribution of covered employees? activity allocable to each grant and includes identification and recording of significant changes in work activity when initial charges were based on estimates. For professorial and other professional staff members, the activity reports will be prepared each academic term, but at least every 6 months. The University?s `Effort Reporting Policy? states ?Subjects must return the certified effort verification report no later than 30 calendar days after they have been distributed.? Additionally, as set forth in 2 CFR 200, the University is required to ensure allowable costs do not consist of improper payments, including payments that should not have been made or that were made in incorrect amounts (including overpayments and underpayments). Indirect costs are required to adhere to 2 CFR 200, Appendix III. Further, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official. Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and 45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: While performing procedures related to personnel expenses, we noted the University had not followed their `Effort Reporting Policy? which states ?Subjects must return the certified effort verification report no later than 30 calendar days after they have been distributed.? We noted two of our sixty sampled effort reports that had not been returned within the 30-calendar day policy. Total payroll and fringe totaled approximately $13,200,000 during fiscal year 2022. While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted three of forty sampled grants (totaling $3,385,750) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect object class that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class which resulted in overcharges during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 for a total overstatement of $1,888 as noted below: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Additionally, we noted indirect costs were overcharged for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $3,385,750) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect object class during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2021 that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class which resulted in overcharges. These overstatements were corrected during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 for a total of $18,377 as noted below: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2022 totaled approximately $8,360,000. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their `Cost Transfer Policy? which states ?Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis?. The University?s cost transfer policy defines timely as ?occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)?. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted thirty-two of our sixty-seven sampled cost transfers (totaling $3,153,441 positive and $2,900,348 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 581 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (21 were between 91 and 180 days past, 6 were between 181 and 270 days past, and 5 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers, we noted the following exceptions: We noted a transaction which was originally recorded to an incorrect object class that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class that did not allow F&A costs to be applied: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that exceeded the amount of the award resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Positive cost transfers were approximately $4,060,000 and negative cost transfers were $3,510,000 during fiscal year 2022. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with activities allowed/unallowed and allowable costs/cost principles. Questioned Cost: Questioned costs are not determinable. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2022, they continued reconciliation procedures related to `grant level? activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday in the previous fiscal year. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual R&D Cluster agreement as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2021 001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University take a fresh look at its processes, policies and internal controls to determine what is needed, post Workday implementation, to prevent and detect noncompliance with activities allowed and unallowed and adherence to allowable cost principles/cost principles. Additionally, we recommend the University determine and address the underlying root cause that is contributing to the volume of cost transfers and take necessary action to prevent unallowable costs from posting to the grant. We also recommend the University consider implementation of an automated control to ensure F&A is charged appropriately when cost transfer entries are made. Lastly, we recommend the University determine what additional Workday automated reporting is available to monitor compliance for personnel expenses, including effort verification reporting, F&A, etc. for activities allowed or unallowed and allowable costs/cost principles.
Finding 2022 001 Federal Program Title ? Research & Development Cluster (R&D) Assistance Listing Nos. ? As listed on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Federal Agencies ? U.S. Department of Agriculture, U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Department of Defense, U.S. Department of Interior, U.S. Department of Justice, Department of State, U.S. Department of Transportation, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, National Endowment for the Humanities, National Science Foundation, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, U.S. Department of Energy, U.S. Department of Education, and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Award Numbers ? As listed on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Grant Award Periods ? Various Compliance Requirement ? Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Criteria: 2 CFR 200.430 includes the standards for documentation of personnel expenses. According to 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1), charges to federal awards for salary and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. Among other requirements within 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1), section (i) states records must be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated and section (v) states that the records must comply with established accounting policies and practices. Also, the HHS Grants Policy for educational institutions requires a plan confirmation system (system) for professorial and other professional staff members that is based on budgeted, planned, or assigned work activity and that is updated to reflect any significant changes in work distribution. The system must be incorporated into the organization?s official records and must identify activity applicable to each sponsored agreement and to each category needed to identify indirect costs and the functions to which they are allocable. At least annually, the employee, principal investigator, or responsible official will verify, by suitable means, that the work was performed and that the salaries and wages charged to sponsored agreements, whether as direct charges or in other categories of cost, are reasonable in relation to the work performed. A system, supported by after-the-fact activity reports, that reflects the distribution of covered employees? activity allocable to each grant and includes identification and recording of significant changes in work activity when initial charges were based on estimates. For professorial and other professional staff members, the activity reports will be prepared each academic term, but at least every 6 months. The University?s `Effort Reporting Policy? states ?Subjects must return the certified effort verification report no later than 30 calendar days after they have been distributed.? Additionally, as set forth in 2 CFR 200, the University is required to ensure allowable costs do not consist of improper payments, including payments that should not have been made or that were made in incorrect amounts (including overpayments and underpayments). Indirect costs are required to adhere to 2 CFR 200, Appendix III. Further, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official. Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and 45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: While performing procedures related to personnel expenses, we noted the University had not followed their `Effort Reporting Policy? which states ?Subjects must return the certified effort verification report no later than 30 calendar days after they have been distributed.? We noted two of our sixty sampled effort reports that had not been returned within the 30-calendar day policy. Total payroll and fringe totaled approximately $13,200,000 during fiscal year 2022. While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted three of forty sampled grants (totaling $3,385,750) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect object class that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class which resulted in overcharges during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 for a total overstatement of $1,888 as noted below: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Additionally, we noted indirect costs were overcharged for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $3,385,750) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect object class during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2021 that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class which resulted in overcharges. These overstatements were corrected during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 for a total of $18,377 as noted below: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2022 totaled approximately $8,360,000. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their `Cost Transfer Policy? which states ?Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis?. The University?s cost transfer policy defines timely as ?occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)?. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted thirty-two of our sixty-seven sampled cost transfers (totaling $3,153,441 positive and $2,900,348 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 581 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (21 were between 91 and 180 days past, 6 were between 181 and 270 days past, and 5 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers, we noted the following exceptions: We noted a transaction which was originally recorded to an incorrect object class that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class that did not allow F&A costs to be applied: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that exceeded the amount of the award resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Positive cost transfers were approximately $4,060,000 and negative cost transfers were $3,510,000 during fiscal year 2022. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with activities allowed/unallowed and allowable costs/cost principles. Questioned Cost: Questioned costs are not determinable. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2022, they continued reconciliation procedures related to `grant level? activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday in the previous fiscal year. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual R&D Cluster agreement as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2021 001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University take a fresh look at its processes, policies and internal controls to determine what is needed, post Workday implementation, to prevent and detect noncompliance with activities allowed and unallowed and adherence to allowable cost principles/cost principles. Additionally, we recommend the University determine and address the underlying root cause that is contributing to the volume of cost transfers and take necessary action to prevent unallowable costs from posting to the grant. We also recommend the University consider implementation of an automated control to ensure F&A is charged appropriately when cost transfer entries are made. Lastly, we recommend the University determine what additional Workday automated reporting is available to monitor compliance for personnel expenses, including effort verification reporting, F&A, etc. for activities allowed or unallowed and allowable costs/cost principles.
Finding 2022 001 Federal Program Title ? Research & Development Cluster (R&D) Assistance Listing Nos. ? As listed on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Federal Agencies ? U.S. Department of Agriculture, U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Department of Defense, U.S. Department of Interior, U.S. Department of Justice, Department of State, U.S. Department of Transportation, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, National Endowment for the Humanities, National Science Foundation, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, U.S. Department of Energy, U.S. Department of Education, and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Award Numbers ? As listed on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Grant Award Periods ? Various Compliance Requirement ? Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Criteria: 2 CFR 200.430 includes the standards for documentation of personnel expenses. According to 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1), charges to federal awards for salary and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. Among other requirements within 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1), section (i) states records must be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated and section (v) states that the records must comply with established accounting policies and practices. Also, the HHS Grants Policy for educational institutions requires a plan confirmation system (system) for professorial and other professional staff members that is based on budgeted, planned, or assigned work activity and that is updated to reflect any significant changes in work distribution. The system must be incorporated into the organization?s official records and must identify activity applicable to each sponsored agreement and to each category needed to identify indirect costs and the functions to which they are allocable. At least annually, the employee, principal investigator, or responsible official will verify, by suitable means, that the work was performed and that the salaries and wages charged to sponsored agreements, whether as direct charges or in other categories of cost, are reasonable in relation to the work performed. A system, supported by after-the-fact activity reports, that reflects the distribution of covered employees? activity allocable to each grant and includes identification and recording of significant changes in work activity when initial charges were based on estimates. For professorial and other professional staff members, the activity reports will be prepared each academic term, but at least every 6 months. The University?s `Effort Reporting Policy? states ?Subjects must return the certified effort verification report no later than 30 calendar days after they have been distributed.? Additionally, as set forth in 2 CFR 200, the University is required to ensure allowable costs do not consist of improper payments, including payments that should not have been made or that were made in incorrect amounts (including overpayments and underpayments). Indirect costs are required to adhere to 2 CFR 200, Appendix III. Further, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official. Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and 45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: While performing procedures related to personnel expenses, we noted the University had not followed their `Effort Reporting Policy? which states ?Subjects must return the certified effort verification report no later than 30 calendar days after they have been distributed.? We noted two of our sixty sampled effort reports that had not been returned within the 30-calendar day policy. Total payroll and fringe totaled approximately $13,200,000 during fiscal year 2022. While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted three of forty sampled grants (totaling $3,385,750) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect object class that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class which resulted in overcharges during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 for a total overstatement of $1,888 as noted below: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Additionally, we noted indirect costs were overcharged for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $3,385,750) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect object class during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2021 that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class which resulted in overcharges. These overstatements were corrected during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 for a total of $18,377 as noted below: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2022 totaled approximately $8,360,000. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their `Cost Transfer Policy? which states ?Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis?. The University?s cost transfer policy defines timely as ?occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)?. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted thirty-two of our sixty-seven sampled cost transfers (totaling $3,153,441 positive and $2,900,348 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 581 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (21 were between 91 and 180 days past, 6 were between 181 and 270 days past, and 5 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers, we noted the following exceptions: We noted a transaction which was originally recorded to an incorrect object class that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class that did not allow F&A costs to be applied: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that exceeded the amount of the award resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Positive cost transfers were approximately $4,060,000 and negative cost transfers were $3,510,000 during fiscal year 2022. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with activities allowed/unallowed and allowable costs/cost principles. Questioned Cost: Questioned costs are not determinable. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2022, they continued reconciliation procedures related to `grant level? activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday in the previous fiscal year. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual R&D Cluster agreement as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2021 001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University take a fresh look at its processes, policies and internal controls to determine what is needed, post Workday implementation, to prevent and detect noncompliance with activities allowed and unallowed and adherence to allowable cost principles/cost principles. Additionally, we recommend the University determine and address the underlying root cause that is contributing to the volume of cost transfers and take necessary action to prevent unallowable costs from posting to the grant. We also recommend the University consider implementation of an automated control to ensure F&A is charged appropriately when cost transfer entries are made. Lastly, we recommend the University determine what additional Workday automated reporting is available to monitor compliance for personnel expenses, including effort verification reporting, F&A, etc. for activities allowed or unallowed and allowable costs/cost principles.
Finding 2022 001 Federal Program Title ? Research & Development Cluster (R&D) Assistance Listing Nos. ? As listed on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Federal Agencies ? U.S. Department of Agriculture, U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Department of Defense, U.S. Department of Interior, U.S. Department of Justice, Department of State, U.S. Department of Transportation, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, National Endowment for the Humanities, National Science Foundation, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, U.S. Department of Energy, U.S. Department of Education, and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Award Numbers ? As listed on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Grant Award Periods ? Various Compliance Requirement ? Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Criteria: 2 CFR 200.430 includes the standards for documentation of personnel expenses. According to 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1), charges to federal awards for salary and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. Among other requirements within 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1), section (i) states records must be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated and section (v) states that the records must comply with established accounting policies and practices. Also, the HHS Grants Policy for educational institutions requires a plan confirmation system (system) for professorial and other professional staff members that is based on budgeted, planned, or assigned work activity and that is updated to reflect any significant changes in work distribution. The system must be incorporated into the organization?s official records and must identify activity applicable to each sponsored agreement and to each category needed to identify indirect costs and the functions to which they are allocable. At least annually, the employee, principal investigator, or responsible official will verify, by suitable means, that the work was performed and that the salaries and wages charged to sponsored agreements, whether as direct charges or in other categories of cost, are reasonable in relation to the work performed. A system, supported by after-the-fact activity reports, that reflects the distribution of covered employees? activity allocable to each grant and includes identification and recording of significant changes in work activity when initial charges were based on estimates. For professorial and other professional staff members, the activity reports will be prepared each academic term, but at least every 6 months. The University?s `Effort Reporting Policy? states ?Subjects must return the certified effort verification report no later than 30 calendar days after they have been distributed.? Additionally, as set forth in 2 CFR 200, the University is required to ensure allowable costs do not consist of improper payments, including payments that should not have been made or that were made in incorrect amounts (including overpayments and underpayments). Indirect costs are required to adhere to 2 CFR 200, Appendix III. Further, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official. Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and 45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: While performing procedures related to personnel expenses, we noted the University had not followed their `Effort Reporting Policy? which states ?Subjects must return the certified effort verification report no later than 30 calendar days after they have been distributed.? We noted two of our sixty sampled effort reports that had not been returned within the 30-calendar day policy. Total payroll and fringe totaled approximately $13,200,000 during fiscal year 2022. While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted three of forty sampled grants (totaling $3,385,750) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect object class that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class which resulted in overcharges during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 for a total overstatement of $1,888 as noted below: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Additionally, we noted indirect costs were overcharged for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $3,385,750) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect object class during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2021 that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class which resulted in overcharges. These overstatements were corrected during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 for a total of $18,377 as noted below: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2022 totaled approximately $8,360,000. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their `Cost Transfer Policy? which states ?Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis?. The University?s cost transfer policy defines timely as ?occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)?. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted thirty-two of our sixty-seven sampled cost transfers (totaling $3,153,441 positive and $2,900,348 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 581 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (21 were between 91 and 180 days past, 6 were between 181 and 270 days past, and 5 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers, we noted the following exceptions: We noted a transaction which was originally recorded to an incorrect object class that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class that did not allow F&A costs to be applied: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that exceeded the amount of the award resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Positive cost transfers were approximately $4,060,000 and negative cost transfers were $3,510,000 during fiscal year 2022. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with activities allowed/unallowed and allowable costs/cost principles. Questioned Cost: Questioned costs are not determinable. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2022, they continued reconciliation procedures related to `grant level? activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday in the previous fiscal year. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual R&D Cluster agreement as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2021 001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University take a fresh look at its processes, policies and internal controls to determine what is needed, post Workday implementation, to prevent and detect noncompliance with activities allowed and unallowed and adherence to allowable cost principles/cost principles. Additionally, we recommend the University determine and address the underlying root cause that is contributing to the volume of cost transfers and take necessary action to prevent unallowable costs from posting to the grant. We also recommend the University consider implementation of an automated control to ensure F&A is charged appropriately when cost transfer entries are made. Lastly, we recommend the University determine what additional Workday automated reporting is available to monitor compliance for personnel expenses, including effort verification reporting, F&A, etc. for activities allowed or unallowed and allowable costs/cost principles.
Finding 2022 001 Federal Program Title ? Research & Development Cluster (R&D) Assistance Listing Nos. ? As listed on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Federal Agencies ? U.S. Department of Agriculture, U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Department of Defense, U.S. Department of Interior, U.S. Department of Justice, Department of State, U.S. Department of Transportation, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, National Endowment for the Humanities, National Science Foundation, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, U.S. Department of Energy, U.S. Department of Education, and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Award Numbers ? As listed on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Grant Award Periods ? Various Compliance Requirement ? Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Criteria: 2 CFR 200.430 includes the standards for documentation of personnel expenses. According to 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1), charges to federal awards for salary and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. Among other requirements within 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1), section (i) states records must be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated and section (v) states that the records must comply with established accounting policies and practices. Also, the HHS Grants Policy for educational institutions requires a plan confirmation system (system) for professorial and other professional staff members that is based on budgeted, planned, or assigned work activity and that is updated to reflect any significant changes in work distribution. The system must be incorporated into the organization?s official records and must identify activity applicable to each sponsored agreement and to each category needed to identify indirect costs and the functions to which they are allocable. At least annually, the employee, principal investigator, or responsible official will verify, by suitable means, that the work was performed and that the salaries and wages charged to sponsored agreements, whether as direct charges or in other categories of cost, are reasonable in relation to the work performed. A system, supported by after-the-fact activity reports, that reflects the distribution of covered employees? activity allocable to each grant and includes identification and recording of significant changes in work activity when initial charges were based on estimates. For professorial and other professional staff members, the activity reports will be prepared each academic term, but at least every 6 months. The University?s `Effort Reporting Policy? states ?Subjects must return the certified effort verification report no later than 30 calendar days after they have been distributed.? Additionally, as set forth in 2 CFR 200, the University is required to ensure allowable costs do not consist of improper payments, including payments that should not have been made or that were made in incorrect amounts (including overpayments and underpayments). Indirect costs are required to adhere to 2 CFR 200, Appendix III. Further, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official. Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and 45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: While performing procedures related to personnel expenses, we noted the University had not followed their `Effort Reporting Policy? which states ?Subjects must return the certified effort verification report no later than 30 calendar days after they have been distributed.? We noted two of our sixty sampled effort reports that had not been returned within the 30-calendar day policy. Total payroll and fringe totaled approximately $13,200,000 during fiscal year 2022. While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted three of forty sampled grants (totaling $3,385,750) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect object class that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class which resulted in overcharges during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 for a total overstatement of $1,888 as noted below: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Additionally, we noted indirect costs were overcharged for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $3,385,750) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect object class during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2021 that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class which resulted in overcharges. These overstatements were corrected during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 for a total of $18,377 as noted below: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2022 totaled approximately $8,360,000. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their `Cost Transfer Policy? which states ?Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis?. The University?s cost transfer policy defines timely as ?occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)?. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted thirty-two of our sixty-seven sampled cost transfers (totaling $3,153,441 positive and $2,900,348 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 581 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (21 were between 91 and 180 days past, 6 were between 181 and 270 days past, and 5 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers, we noted the following exceptions: We noted a transaction which was originally recorded to an incorrect object class that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class that did not allow F&A costs to be applied: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that exceeded the amount of the award resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Positive cost transfers were approximately $4,060,000 and negative cost transfers were $3,510,000 during fiscal year 2022. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with activities allowed/unallowed and allowable costs/cost principles. Questioned Cost: Questioned costs are not determinable. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2022, they continued reconciliation procedures related to `grant level? activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday in the previous fiscal year. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual R&D Cluster agreement as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2021 001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University take a fresh look at its processes, policies and internal controls to determine what is needed, post Workday implementation, to prevent and detect noncompliance with activities allowed and unallowed and adherence to allowable cost principles/cost principles. Additionally, we recommend the University determine and address the underlying root cause that is contributing to the volume of cost transfers and take necessary action to prevent unallowable costs from posting to the grant. We also recommend the University consider implementation of an automated control to ensure F&A is charged appropriately when cost transfer entries are made. Lastly, we recommend the University determine what additional Workday automated reporting is available to monitor compliance for personnel expenses, including effort verification reporting, F&A, etc. for activities allowed or unallowed and allowable costs/cost principles.
Finding 2022 001 Federal Program Title ? Research & Development Cluster (R&D) Assistance Listing Nos. ? As listed on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Federal Agencies ? U.S. Department of Agriculture, U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Department of Defense, U.S. Department of Interior, U.S. Department of Justice, Department of State, U.S. Department of Transportation, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, National Endowment for the Humanities, National Science Foundation, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, U.S. Department of Energy, U.S. Department of Education, and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Award Numbers ? As listed on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Grant Award Periods ? Various Compliance Requirement ? Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Criteria: 2 CFR 200.430 includes the standards for documentation of personnel expenses. According to 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1), charges to federal awards for salary and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. Among other requirements within 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1), section (i) states records must be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated and section (v) states that the records must comply with established accounting policies and practices. Also, the HHS Grants Policy for educational institutions requires a plan confirmation system (system) for professorial and other professional staff members that is based on budgeted, planned, or assigned work activity and that is updated to reflect any significant changes in work distribution. The system must be incorporated into the organization?s official records and must identify activity applicable to each sponsored agreement and to each category needed to identify indirect costs and the functions to which they are allocable. At least annually, the employee, principal investigator, or responsible official will verify, by suitable means, that the work was performed and that the salaries and wages charged to sponsored agreements, whether as direct charges or in other categories of cost, are reasonable in relation to the work performed. A system, supported by after-the-fact activity reports, that reflects the distribution of covered employees? activity allocable to each grant and includes identification and recording of significant changes in work activity when initial charges were based on estimates. For professorial and other professional staff members, the activity reports will be prepared each academic term, but at least every 6 months. The University?s `Effort Reporting Policy? states ?Subjects must return the certified effort verification report no later than 30 calendar days after they have been distributed.? Additionally, as set forth in 2 CFR 200, the University is required to ensure allowable costs do not consist of improper payments, including payments that should not have been made or that were made in incorrect amounts (including overpayments and underpayments). Indirect costs are required to adhere to 2 CFR 200, Appendix III. Further, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official. Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and 45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: While performing procedures related to personnel expenses, we noted the University had not followed their `Effort Reporting Policy? which states ?Subjects must return the certified effort verification report no later than 30 calendar days after they have been distributed.? We noted two of our sixty sampled effort reports that had not been returned within the 30-calendar day policy. Total payroll and fringe totaled approximately $13,200,000 during fiscal year 2022. While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted three of forty sampled grants (totaling $3,385,750) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect object class that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class which resulted in overcharges during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 for a total overstatement of $1,888 as noted below: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Additionally, we noted indirect costs were overcharged for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $3,385,750) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect object class during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2021 that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class which resulted in overcharges. These overstatements were corrected during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 for a total of $18,377 as noted below: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2022 totaled approximately $8,360,000. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their `Cost Transfer Policy? which states ?Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis?. The University?s cost transfer policy defines timely as ?occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)?. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted thirty-two of our sixty-seven sampled cost transfers (totaling $3,153,441 positive and $2,900,348 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 581 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (21 were between 91 and 180 days past, 6 were between 181 and 270 days past, and 5 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers, we noted the following exceptions: We noted a transaction which was originally recorded to an incorrect object class that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class that did not allow F&A costs to be applied: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that exceeded the amount of the award resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Positive cost transfers were approximately $4,060,000 and negative cost transfers were $3,510,000 during fiscal year 2022. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with activities allowed/unallowed and allowable costs/cost principles. Questioned Cost: Questioned costs are not determinable. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2022, they continued reconciliation procedures related to `grant level? activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday in the previous fiscal year. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual R&D Cluster agreement as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2021 001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University take a fresh look at its processes, policies and internal controls to determine what is needed, post Workday implementation, to prevent and detect noncompliance with activities allowed and unallowed and adherence to allowable cost principles/cost principles. Additionally, we recommend the University determine and address the underlying root cause that is contributing to the volume of cost transfers and take necessary action to prevent unallowable costs from posting to the grant. We also recommend the University consider implementation of an automated control to ensure F&A is charged appropriately when cost transfer entries are made. Lastly, we recommend the University determine what additional Workday automated reporting is available to monitor compliance for personnel expenses, including effort verification reporting, F&A, etc. for activities allowed or unallowed and allowable costs/cost principles.
Finding 2022 001 Federal Program Title ? Research & Development Cluster (R&D) Assistance Listing Nos. ? As listed on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Federal Agencies ? U.S. Department of Agriculture, U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Department of Defense, U.S. Department of Interior, U.S. Department of Justice, Department of State, U.S. Department of Transportation, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, National Endowment for the Humanities, National Science Foundation, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, U.S. Department of Energy, U.S. Department of Education, and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Award Numbers ? As listed on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Grant Award Periods ? Various Compliance Requirement ? Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Criteria: 2 CFR 200.430 includes the standards for documentation of personnel expenses. According to 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1), charges to federal awards for salary and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. Among other requirements within 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1), section (i) states records must be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated and section (v) states that the records must comply with established accounting policies and practices. Also, the HHS Grants Policy for educational institutions requires a plan confirmation system (system) for professorial and other professional staff members that is based on budgeted, planned, or assigned work activity and that is updated to reflect any significant changes in work distribution. The system must be incorporated into the organization?s official records and must identify activity applicable to each sponsored agreement and to each category needed to identify indirect costs and the functions to which they are allocable. At least annually, the employee, principal investigator, or responsible official will verify, by suitable means, that the work was performed and that the salaries and wages charged to sponsored agreements, whether as direct charges or in other categories of cost, are reasonable in relation to the work performed. A system, supported by after-the-fact activity reports, that reflects the distribution of covered employees? activity allocable to each grant and includes identification and recording of significant changes in work activity when initial charges were based on estimates. For professorial and other professional staff members, the activity reports will be prepared each academic term, but at least every 6 months. The University?s `Effort Reporting Policy? states ?Subjects must return the certified effort verification report no later than 30 calendar days after they have been distributed.? Additionally, as set forth in 2 CFR 200, the University is required to ensure allowable costs do not consist of improper payments, including payments that should not have been made or that were made in incorrect amounts (including overpayments and underpayments). Indirect costs are required to adhere to 2 CFR 200, Appendix III. Further, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official. Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and 45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: While performing procedures related to personnel expenses, we noted the University had not followed their `Effort Reporting Policy? which states ?Subjects must return the certified effort verification report no later than 30 calendar days after they have been distributed.? We noted two of our sixty sampled effort reports that had not been returned within the 30-calendar day policy. Total payroll and fringe totaled approximately $13,200,000 during fiscal year 2022. While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted three of forty sampled grants (totaling $3,385,750) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect object class that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class which resulted in overcharges during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 for a total overstatement of $1,888 as noted below: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Additionally, we noted indirect costs were overcharged for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $3,385,750) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect object class during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2021 that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class which resulted in overcharges. These overstatements were corrected during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 for a total of $18,377 as noted below: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2022 totaled approximately $8,360,000. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their `Cost Transfer Policy? which states ?Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis?. The University?s cost transfer policy defines timely as ?occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)?. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted thirty-two of our sixty-seven sampled cost transfers (totaling $3,153,441 positive and $2,900,348 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 581 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (21 were between 91 and 180 days past, 6 were between 181 and 270 days past, and 5 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers, we noted the following exceptions: We noted a transaction which was originally recorded to an incorrect object class that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class that did not allow F&A costs to be applied: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that exceeded the amount of the award resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Positive cost transfers were approximately $4,060,000 and negative cost transfers were $3,510,000 during fiscal year 2022. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with activities allowed/unallowed and allowable costs/cost principles. Questioned Cost: Questioned costs are not determinable. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2022, they continued reconciliation procedures related to `grant level? activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday in the previous fiscal year. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual R&D Cluster agreement as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2021 001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University take a fresh look at its processes, policies and internal controls to determine what is needed, post Workday implementation, to prevent and detect noncompliance with activities allowed and unallowed and adherence to allowable cost principles/cost principles. Additionally, we recommend the University determine and address the underlying root cause that is contributing to the volume of cost transfers and take necessary action to prevent unallowable costs from posting to the grant. We also recommend the University consider implementation of an automated control to ensure F&A is charged appropriately when cost transfer entries are made. Lastly, we recommend the University determine what additional Workday automated reporting is available to monitor compliance for personnel expenses, including effort verification reporting, F&A, etc. for activities allowed or unallowed and allowable costs/cost principles.
Finding 2022 001 Federal Program Title ? Research & Development Cluster (R&D) Assistance Listing Nos. ? As listed on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Federal Agencies ? U.S. Department of Agriculture, U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Department of Defense, U.S. Department of Interior, U.S. Department of Justice, Department of State, U.S. Department of Transportation, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, National Endowment for the Humanities, National Science Foundation, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, U.S. Department of Energy, U.S. Department of Education, and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Award Numbers ? As listed on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Grant Award Periods ? Various Compliance Requirement ? Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Criteria: 2 CFR 200.430 includes the standards for documentation of personnel expenses. According to 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1), charges to federal awards for salary and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. Among other requirements within 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1), section (i) states records must be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated and section (v) states that the records must comply with established accounting policies and practices. Also, the HHS Grants Policy for educational institutions requires a plan confirmation system (system) for professorial and other professional staff members that is based on budgeted, planned, or assigned work activity and that is updated to reflect any significant changes in work distribution. The system must be incorporated into the organization?s official records and must identify activity applicable to each sponsored agreement and to each category needed to identify indirect costs and the functions to which they are allocable. At least annually, the employee, principal investigator, or responsible official will verify, by suitable means, that the work was performed and that the salaries and wages charged to sponsored agreements, whether as direct charges or in other categories of cost, are reasonable in relation to the work performed. A system, supported by after-the-fact activity reports, that reflects the distribution of covered employees? activity allocable to each grant and includes identification and recording of significant changes in work activity when initial charges were based on estimates. For professorial and other professional staff members, the activity reports will be prepared each academic term, but at least every 6 months. The University?s `Effort Reporting Policy? states ?Subjects must return the certified effort verification report no later than 30 calendar days after they have been distributed.? Additionally, as set forth in 2 CFR 200, the University is required to ensure allowable costs do not consist of improper payments, including payments that should not have been made or that were made in incorrect amounts (including overpayments and underpayments). Indirect costs are required to adhere to 2 CFR 200, Appendix III. Further, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official. Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and 45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: While performing procedures related to personnel expenses, we noted the University had not followed their `Effort Reporting Policy? which states ?Subjects must return the certified effort verification report no later than 30 calendar days after they have been distributed.? We noted two of our sixty sampled effort reports that had not been returned within the 30-calendar day policy. Total payroll and fringe totaled approximately $13,200,000 during fiscal year 2022. While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted three of forty sampled grants (totaling $3,385,750) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect object class that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class which resulted in overcharges during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 for a total overstatement of $1,888 as noted below: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Additionally, we noted indirect costs were overcharged for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $3,385,750) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect object class during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2021 that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class which resulted in overcharges. These overstatements were corrected during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 for a total of $18,377 as noted below: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2022 totaled approximately $8,360,000. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their `Cost Transfer Policy? which states ?Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis?. The University?s cost transfer policy defines timely as ?occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)?. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted thirty-two of our sixty-seven sampled cost transfers (totaling $3,153,441 positive and $2,900,348 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 581 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (21 were between 91 and 180 days past, 6 were between 181 and 270 days past, and 5 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers, we noted the following exceptions: We noted a transaction which was originally recorded to an incorrect object class that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class that did not allow F&A costs to be applied: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that exceeded the amount of the award resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Positive cost transfers were approximately $4,060,000 and negative cost transfers were $3,510,000 during fiscal year 2022. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with activities allowed/unallowed and allowable costs/cost principles. Questioned Cost: Questioned costs are not determinable. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2022, they continued reconciliation procedures related to `grant level? activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday in the previous fiscal year. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual R&D Cluster agreement as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2021 001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University take a fresh look at its processes, policies and internal controls to determine what is needed, post Workday implementation, to prevent and detect noncompliance with activities allowed and unallowed and adherence to allowable cost principles/cost principles. Additionally, we recommend the University determine and address the underlying root cause that is contributing to the volume of cost transfers and take necessary action to prevent unallowable costs from posting to the grant. We also recommend the University consider implementation of an automated control to ensure F&A is charged appropriately when cost transfer entries are made. Lastly, we recommend the University determine what additional Workday automated reporting is available to monitor compliance for personnel expenses, including effort verification reporting, F&A, etc. for activities allowed or unallowed and allowable costs/cost principles.
Finding 2022 001 Federal Program Title ? Research & Development Cluster (R&D) Assistance Listing Nos. ? As listed on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Federal Agencies ? U.S. Department of Agriculture, U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Department of Defense, U.S. Department of Interior, U.S. Department of Justice, Department of State, U.S. Department of Transportation, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, National Endowment for the Humanities, National Science Foundation, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, U.S. Department of Energy, U.S. Department of Education, and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Award Numbers ? As listed on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Grant Award Periods ? Various Compliance Requirement ? Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Criteria: 2 CFR 200.430 includes the standards for documentation of personnel expenses. According to 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1), charges to federal awards for salary and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. Among other requirements within 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1), section (i) states records must be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated and section (v) states that the records must comply with established accounting policies and practices. Also, the HHS Grants Policy for educational institutions requires a plan confirmation system (system) for professorial and other professional staff members that is based on budgeted, planned, or assigned work activity and that is updated to reflect any significant changes in work distribution. The system must be incorporated into the organization?s official records and must identify activity applicable to each sponsored agreement and to each category needed to identify indirect costs and the functions to which they are allocable. At least annually, the employee, principal investigator, or responsible official will verify, by suitable means, that the work was performed and that the salaries and wages charged to sponsored agreements, whether as direct charges or in other categories of cost, are reasonable in relation to the work performed. A system, supported by after-the-fact activity reports, that reflects the distribution of covered employees? activity allocable to each grant and includes identification and recording of significant changes in work activity when initial charges were based on estimates. For professorial and other professional staff members, the activity reports will be prepared each academic term, but at least every 6 months. The University?s `Effort Reporting Policy? states ?Subjects must return the certified effort verification report no later than 30 calendar days after they have been distributed.? Additionally, as set forth in 2 CFR 200, the University is required to ensure allowable costs do not consist of improper payments, including payments that should not have been made or that were made in incorrect amounts (including overpayments and underpayments). Indirect costs are required to adhere to 2 CFR 200, Appendix III. Further, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official. Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and 45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: While performing procedures related to personnel expenses, we noted the University had not followed their `Effort Reporting Policy? which states ?Subjects must return the certified effort verification report no later than 30 calendar days after they have been distributed.? We noted two of our sixty sampled effort reports that had not been returned within the 30-calendar day policy. Total payroll and fringe totaled approximately $13,200,000 during fiscal year 2022. While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted three of forty sampled grants (totaling $3,385,750) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect object class that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class which resulted in overcharges during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 for a total overstatement of $1,888 as noted below: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Additionally, we noted indirect costs were overcharged for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $3,385,750) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect object class during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2021 that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class which resulted in overcharges. These overstatements were corrected during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 for a total of $18,377 as noted below: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2022 totaled approximately $8,360,000. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their `Cost Transfer Policy? which states ?Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis?. The University?s cost transfer policy defines timely as ?occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)?. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted thirty-two of our sixty-seven sampled cost transfers (totaling $3,153,441 positive and $2,900,348 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 581 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (21 were between 91 and 180 days past, 6 were between 181 and 270 days past, and 5 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers, we noted the following exceptions: We noted a transaction which was originally recorded to an incorrect object class that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class that did not allow F&A costs to be applied: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that exceeded the amount of the award resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Positive cost transfers were approximately $4,060,000 and negative cost transfers were $3,510,000 during fiscal year 2022. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with activities allowed/unallowed and allowable costs/cost principles. Questioned Cost: Questioned costs are not determinable. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2022, they continued reconciliation procedures related to `grant level? activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday in the previous fiscal year. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual R&D Cluster agreement as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2021 001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University take a fresh look at its processes, policies and internal controls to determine what is needed, post Workday implementation, to prevent and detect noncompliance with activities allowed and unallowed and adherence to allowable cost principles/cost principles. Additionally, we recommend the University determine and address the underlying root cause that is contributing to the volume of cost transfers and take necessary action to prevent unallowable costs from posting to the grant. We also recommend the University consider implementation of an automated control to ensure F&A is charged appropriately when cost transfer entries are made. Lastly, we recommend the University determine what additional Workday automated reporting is available to monitor compliance for personnel expenses, including effort verification reporting, F&A, etc. for activities allowed or unallowed and allowable costs/cost principles.
Finding 2022 001 Federal Program Title ? Research & Development Cluster (R&D) Assistance Listing Nos. ? As listed on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Federal Agencies ? U.S. Department of Agriculture, U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Department of Defense, U.S. Department of Interior, U.S. Department of Justice, Department of State, U.S. Department of Transportation, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, National Endowment for the Humanities, National Science Foundation, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, U.S. Department of Energy, U.S. Department of Education, and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Award Numbers ? As listed on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Grant Award Periods ? Various Compliance Requirement ? Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Criteria: 2 CFR 200.430 includes the standards for documentation of personnel expenses. According to 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1), charges to federal awards for salary and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. Among other requirements within 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1), section (i) states records must be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated and section (v) states that the records must comply with established accounting policies and practices. Also, the HHS Grants Policy for educational institutions requires a plan confirmation system (system) for professorial and other professional staff members that is based on budgeted, planned, or assigned work activity and that is updated to reflect any significant changes in work distribution. The system must be incorporated into the organization?s official records and must identify activity applicable to each sponsored agreement and to each category needed to identify indirect costs and the functions to which they are allocable. At least annually, the employee, principal investigator, or responsible official will verify, by suitable means, that the work was performed and that the salaries and wages charged to sponsored agreements, whether as direct charges or in other categories of cost, are reasonable in relation to the work performed. A system, supported by after-the-fact activity reports, that reflects the distribution of covered employees? activity allocable to each grant and includes identification and recording of significant changes in work activity when initial charges were based on estimates. For professorial and other professional staff members, the activity reports will be prepared each academic term, but at least every 6 months. The University?s `Effort Reporting Policy? states ?Subjects must return the certified effort verification report no later than 30 calendar days after they have been distributed.? Additionally, as set forth in 2 CFR 200, the University is required to ensure allowable costs do not consist of improper payments, including payments that should not have been made or that were made in incorrect amounts (including overpayments and underpayments). Indirect costs are required to adhere to 2 CFR 200, Appendix III. Further, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official. Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and 45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: While performing procedures related to personnel expenses, we noted the University had not followed their `Effort Reporting Policy? which states ?Subjects must return the certified effort verification report no later than 30 calendar days after they have been distributed.? We noted two of our sixty sampled effort reports that had not been returned within the 30-calendar day policy. Total payroll and fringe totaled approximately $13,200,000 during fiscal year 2022. While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted three of forty sampled grants (totaling $3,385,750) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect object class that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class which resulted in overcharges during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 for a total overstatement of $1,888 as noted below: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Additionally, we noted indirect costs were overcharged for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $3,385,750) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect object class during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2021 that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class which resulted in overcharges. These overstatements were corrected during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 for a total of $18,377 as noted below: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2022 totaled approximately $8,360,000. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their `Cost Transfer Policy? which states ?Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis?. The University?s cost transfer policy defines timely as ?occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)?. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted thirty-two of our sixty-seven sampled cost transfers (totaling $3,153,441 positive and $2,900,348 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 581 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (21 were between 91 and 180 days past, 6 were between 181 and 270 days past, and 5 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers, we noted the following exceptions: We noted a transaction which was originally recorded to an incorrect object class that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class that did not allow F&A costs to be applied: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that exceeded the amount of the award resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Positive cost transfers were approximately $4,060,000 and negative cost transfers were $3,510,000 during fiscal year 2022. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with activities allowed/unallowed and allowable costs/cost principles. Questioned Cost: Questioned costs are not determinable. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2022, they continued reconciliation procedures related to `grant level? activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday in the previous fiscal year. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual R&D Cluster agreement as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2021 001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University take a fresh look at its processes, policies and internal controls to determine what is needed, post Workday implementation, to prevent and detect noncompliance with activities allowed and unallowed and adherence to allowable cost principles/cost principles. Additionally, we recommend the University determine and address the underlying root cause that is contributing to the volume of cost transfers and take necessary action to prevent unallowable costs from posting to the grant. We also recommend the University consider implementation of an automated control to ensure F&A is charged appropriately when cost transfer entries are made. Lastly, we recommend the University determine what additional Workday automated reporting is available to monitor compliance for personnel expenses, including effort verification reporting, F&A, etc. for activities allowed or unallowed and allowable costs/cost principles.
Finding 2022 001 Federal Program Title ? Research & Development Cluster (R&D) Assistance Listing Nos. ? As listed on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Federal Agencies ? U.S. Department of Agriculture, U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Department of Defense, U.S. Department of Interior, U.S. Department of Justice, Department of State, U.S. Department of Transportation, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, National Endowment for the Humanities, National Science Foundation, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, U.S. Department of Energy, U.S. Department of Education, and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Award Numbers ? As listed on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Grant Award Periods ? Various Compliance Requirement ? Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Criteria: 2 CFR 200.430 includes the standards for documentation of personnel expenses. According to 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1), charges to federal awards for salary and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. Among other requirements within 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1), section (i) states records must be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated and section (v) states that the records must comply with established accounting policies and practices. Also, the HHS Grants Policy for educational institutions requires a plan confirmation system (system) for professorial and other professional staff members that is based on budgeted, planned, or assigned work activity and that is updated to reflect any significant changes in work distribution. The system must be incorporated into the organization?s official records and must identify activity applicable to each sponsored agreement and to each category needed to identify indirect costs and the functions to which they are allocable. At least annually, the employee, principal investigator, or responsible official will verify, by suitable means, that the work was performed and that the salaries and wages charged to sponsored agreements, whether as direct charges or in other categories of cost, are reasonable in relation to the work performed. A system, supported by after-the-fact activity reports, that reflects the distribution of covered employees? activity allocable to each grant and includes identification and recording of significant changes in work activity when initial charges were based on estimates. For professorial and other professional staff members, the activity reports will be prepared each academic term, but at least every 6 months. The University?s `Effort Reporting Policy? states ?Subjects must return the certified effort verification report no later than 30 calendar days after they have been distributed.? Additionally, as set forth in 2 CFR 200, the University is required to ensure allowable costs do not consist of improper payments, including payments that should not have been made or that were made in incorrect amounts (including overpayments and underpayments). Indirect costs are required to adhere to 2 CFR 200, Appendix III. Further, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official. Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and 45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: While performing procedures related to personnel expenses, we noted the University had not followed their `Effort Reporting Policy? which states ?Subjects must return the certified effort verification report no later than 30 calendar days after they have been distributed.? We noted two of our sixty sampled effort reports that had not been returned within the 30-calendar day policy. Total payroll and fringe totaled approximately $13,200,000 during fiscal year 2022. While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted three of forty sampled grants (totaling $3,385,750) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect object class that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class which resulted in overcharges during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 for a total overstatement of $1,888 as noted below: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Additionally, we noted indirect costs were overcharged for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $3,385,750) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect object class during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2021 that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class which resulted in overcharges. These overstatements were corrected during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 for a total of $18,377 as noted below: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2022 totaled approximately $8,360,000. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their `Cost Transfer Policy? which states ?Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis?. The University?s cost transfer policy defines timely as ?occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)?. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted thirty-two of our sixty-seven sampled cost transfers (totaling $3,153,441 positive and $2,900,348 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 581 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (21 were between 91 and 180 days past, 6 were between 181 and 270 days past, and 5 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers, we noted the following exceptions: We noted a transaction which was originally recorded to an incorrect object class that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class that did not allow F&A costs to be applied: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that exceeded the amount of the award resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Positive cost transfers were approximately $4,060,000 and negative cost transfers were $3,510,000 during fiscal year 2022. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with activities allowed/unallowed and allowable costs/cost principles. Questioned Cost: Questioned costs are not determinable. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2022, they continued reconciliation procedures related to `grant level? activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday in the previous fiscal year. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual R&D Cluster agreement as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2021 001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University take a fresh look at its processes, policies and internal controls to determine what is needed, post Workday implementation, to prevent and detect noncompliance with activities allowed and unallowed and adherence to allowable cost principles/cost principles. Additionally, we recommend the University determine and address the underlying root cause that is contributing to the volume of cost transfers and take necessary action to prevent unallowable costs from posting to the grant. We also recommend the University consider implementation of an automated control to ensure F&A is charged appropriately when cost transfer entries are made. Lastly, we recommend the University determine what additional Workday automated reporting is available to monitor compliance for personnel expenses, including effort verification reporting, F&A, etc. for activities allowed or unallowed and allowable costs/cost principles.
Finding 2022 001 Federal Program Title ? Research & Development Cluster (R&D) Assistance Listing Nos. ? As listed on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Federal Agencies ? U.S. Department of Agriculture, U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Department of Defense, U.S. Department of Interior, U.S. Department of Justice, Department of State, U.S. Department of Transportation, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, National Endowment for the Humanities, National Science Foundation, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, U.S. Department of Energy, U.S. Department of Education, and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Award Numbers ? As listed on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Grant Award Periods ? Various Compliance Requirement ? Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Criteria: 2 CFR 200.430 includes the standards for documentation of personnel expenses. According to 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1), charges to federal awards for salary and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. Among other requirements within 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1), section (i) states records must be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated and section (v) states that the records must comply with established accounting policies and practices. Also, the HHS Grants Policy for educational institutions requires a plan confirmation system (system) for professorial and other professional staff members that is based on budgeted, planned, or assigned work activity and that is updated to reflect any significant changes in work distribution. The system must be incorporated into the organization?s official records and must identify activity applicable to each sponsored agreement and to each category needed to identify indirect costs and the functions to which they are allocable. At least annually, the employee, principal investigator, or responsible official will verify, by suitable means, that the work was performed and that the salaries and wages charged to sponsored agreements, whether as direct charges or in other categories of cost, are reasonable in relation to the work performed. A system, supported by after-the-fact activity reports, that reflects the distribution of covered employees? activity allocable to each grant and includes identification and recording of significant changes in work activity when initial charges were based on estimates. For professorial and other professional staff members, the activity reports will be prepared each academic term, but at least every 6 months. The University?s `Effort Reporting Policy? states ?Subjects must return the certified effort verification report no later than 30 calendar days after they have been distributed.? Additionally, as set forth in 2 CFR 200, the University is required to ensure allowable costs do not consist of improper payments, including payments that should not have been made or that were made in incorrect amounts (including overpayments and underpayments). Indirect costs are required to adhere to 2 CFR 200, Appendix III. Further, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official. Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and 45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: While performing procedures related to personnel expenses, we noted the University had not followed their `Effort Reporting Policy? which states ?Subjects must return the certified effort verification report no later than 30 calendar days after they have been distributed.? We noted two of our sixty sampled effort reports that had not been returned within the 30-calendar day policy. Total payroll and fringe totaled approximately $13,200,000 during fiscal year 2022. While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted three of forty sampled grants (totaling $3,385,750) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect object class that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class which resulted in overcharges during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 for a total overstatement of $1,888 as noted below: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Additionally, we noted indirect costs were overcharged for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $3,385,750) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect object class during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2021 that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class which resulted in overcharges. These overstatements were corrected during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 for a total of $18,377 as noted below: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2022 totaled approximately $8,360,000. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their `Cost Transfer Policy? which states ?Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis?. The University?s cost transfer policy defines timely as ?occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)?. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted thirty-two of our sixty-seven sampled cost transfers (totaling $3,153,441 positive and $2,900,348 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 581 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (21 were between 91 and 180 days past, 6 were between 181 and 270 days past, and 5 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers, we noted the following exceptions: We noted a transaction which was originally recorded to an incorrect object class that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class that did not allow F&A costs to be applied: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that exceeded the amount of the award resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Positive cost transfers were approximately $4,060,000 and negative cost transfers were $3,510,000 during fiscal year 2022. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with activities allowed/unallowed and allowable costs/cost principles. Questioned Cost: Questioned costs are not determinable. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2022, they continued reconciliation procedures related to `grant level? activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday in the previous fiscal year. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual R&D Cluster agreement as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2021 001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University take a fresh look at its processes, policies and internal controls to determine what is needed, post Workday implementation, to prevent and detect noncompliance with activities allowed and unallowed and adherence to allowable cost principles/cost principles. Additionally, we recommend the University determine and address the underlying root cause that is contributing to the volume of cost transfers and take necessary action to prevent unallowable costs from posting to the grant. We also recommend the University consider implementation of an automated control to ensure F&A is charged appropriately when cost transfer entries are made. Lastly, we recommend the University determine what additional Workday automated reporting is available to monitor compliance for personnel expenses, including effort verification reporting, F&A, etc. for activities allowed or unallowed and allowable costs/cost principles.
Finding 2022 001 Federal Program Title ? Research & Development Cluster (R&D) Assistance Listing Nos. ? As listed on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Federal Agencies ? U.S. Department of Agriculture, U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Department of Defense, U.S. Department of Interior, U.S. Department of Justice, Department of State, U.S. Department of Transportation, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, National Endowment for the Humanities, National Science Foundation, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, U.S. Department of Energy, U.S. Department of Education, and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Award Numbers ? As listed on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Grant Award Periods ? Various Compliance Requirement ? Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Criteria: 2 CFR 200.430 includes the standards for documentation of personnel expenses. According to 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1), charges to federal awards for salary and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. Among other requirements within 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1), section (i) states records must be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated and section (v) states that the records must comply with established accounting policies and practices. Also, the HHS Grants Policy for educational institutions requires a plan confirmation system (system) for professorial and other professional staff members that is based on budgeted, planned, or assigned work activity and that is updated to reflect any significant changes in work distribution. The system must be incorporated into the organization?s official records and must identify activity applicable to each sponsored agreement and to each category needed to identify indirect costs and the functions to which they are allocable. At least annually, the employee, principal investigator, or responsible official will verify, by suitable means, that the work was performed and that the salaries and wages charged to sponsored agreements, whether as direct charges or in other categories of cost, are reasonable in relation to the work performed. A system, supported by after-the-fact activity reports, that reflects the distribution of covered employees? activity allocable to each grant and includes identification and recording of significant changes in work activity when initial charges were based on estimates. For professorial and other professional staff members, the activity reports will be prepared each academic term, but at least every 6 months. The University?s `Effort Reporting Policy? states ?Subjects must return the certified effort verification report no later than 30 calendar days after they have been distributed.? Additionally, as set forth in 2 CFR 200, the University is required to ensure allowable costs do not consist of improper payments, including payments that should not have been made or that were made in incorrect amounts (including overpayments and underpayments). Indirect costs are required to adhere to 2 CFR 200, Appendix III. Further, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official. Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and 45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: While performing procedures related to personnel expenses, we noted the University had not followed their `Effort Reporting Policy? which states ?Subjects must return the certified effort verification report no later than 30 calendar days after they have been distributed.? We noted two of our sixty sampled effort reports that had not been returned within the 30-calendar day policy. Total payroll and fringe totaled approximately $13,200,000 during fiscal year 2022. While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted three of forty sampled grants (totaling $3,385,750) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect object class that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class which resulted in overcharges during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 for a total overstatement of $1,888 as noted below: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Additionally, we noted indirect costs were overcharged for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $3,385,750) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect object class during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2021 that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class which resulted in overcharges. These overstatements were corrected during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 for a total of $18,377 as noted below: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2022 totaled approximately $8,360,000. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their `Cost Transfer Policy? which states ?Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis?. The University?s cost transfer policy defines timely as ?occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)?. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted thirty-two of our sixty-seven sampled cost transfers (totaling $3,153,441 positive and $2,900,348 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 581 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (21 were between 91 and 180 days past, 6 were between 181 and 270 days past, and 5 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers, we noted the following exceptions: We noted a transaction which was originally recorded to an incorrect object class that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class that did not allow F&A costs to be applied: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that exceeded the amount of the award resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Positive cost transfers were approximately $4,060,000 and negative cost transfers were $3,510,000 during fiscal year 2022. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with activities allowed/unallowed and allowable costs/cost principles. Questioned Cost: Questioned costs are not determinable. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2022, they continued reconciliation procedures related to `grant level? activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday in the previous fiscal year. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual R&D Cluster agreement as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2021 001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University take a fresh look at its processes, policies and internal controls to determine what is needed, post Workday implementation, to prevent and detect noncompliance with activities allowed and unallowed and adherence to allowable cost principles/cost principles. Additionally, we recommend the University determine and address the underlying root cause that is contributing to the volume of cost transfers and take necessary action to prevent unallowable costs from posting to the grant. We also recommend the University consider implementation of an automated control to ensure F&A is charged appropriately when cost transfer entries are made. Lastly, we recommend the University determine what additional Workday automated reporting is available to monitor compliance for personnel expenses, including effort verification reporting, F&A, etc. for activities allowed or unallowed and allowable costs/cost principles.
Finding 2022 001 Federal Program Title ? Research & Development Cluster (R&D) Assistance Listing Nos. ? As listed on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Federal Agencies ? U.S. Department of Agriculture, U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Department of Defense, U.S. Department of Interior, U.S. Department of Justice, Department of State, U.S. Department of Transportation, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, National Endowment for the Humanities, National Science Foundation, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, U.S. Department of Energy, U.S. Department of Education, and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Award Numbers ? As listed on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Grant Award Periods ? Various Compliance Requirement ? Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Criteria: 2 CFR 200.430 includes the standards for documentation of personnel expenses. According to 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1), charges to federal awards for salary and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. Among other requirements within 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1), section (i) states records must be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated and section (v) states that the records must comply with established accounting policies and practices. Also, the HHS Grants Policy for educational institutions requires a plan confirmation system (system) for professorial and other professional staff members that is based on budgeted, planned, or assigned work activity and that is updated to reflect any significant changes in work distribution. The system must be incorporated into the organization?s official records and must identify activity applicable to each sponsored agreement and to each category needed to identify indirect costs and the functions to which they are allocable. At least annually, the employee, principal investigator, or responsible official will verify, by suitable means, that the work was performed and that the salaries and wages charged to sponsored agreements, whether as direct charges or in other categories of cost, are reasonable in relation to the work performed. A system, supported by after-the-fact activity reports, that reflects the distribution of covered employees? activity allocable to each grant and includes identification and recording of significant changes in work activity when initial charges were based on estimates. For professorial and other professional staff members, the activity reports will be prepared each academic term, but at least every 6 months. The University?s `Effort Reporting Policy? states ?Subjects must return the certified effort verification report no later than 30 calendar days after they have been distributed.? Additionally, as set forth in 2 CFR 200, the University is required to ensure allowable costs do not consist of improper payments, including payments that should not have been made or that were made in incorrect amounts (including overpayments and underpayments). Indirect costs are required to adhere to 2 CFR 200, Appendix III. Further, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official. Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and 45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: While performing procedures related to personnel expenses, we noted the University had not followed their `Effort Reporting Policy? which states ?Subjects must return the certified effort verification report no later than 30 calendar days after they have been distributed.? We noted two of our sixty sampled effort reports that had not been returned within the 30-calendar day policy. Total payroll and fringe totaled approximately $13,200,000 during fiscal year 2022. While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted three of forty sampled grants (totaling $3,385,750) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect object class that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class which resulted in overcharges during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 for a total overstatement of $1,888 as noted below: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Additionally, we noted indirect costs were overcharged for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $3,385,750) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect object class during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2021 that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class which resulted in overcharges. These overstatements were corrected during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 for a total of $18,377 as noted below: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2022 totaled approximately $8,360,000. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their `Cost Transfer Policy? which states ?Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis?. The University?s cost transfer policy defines timely as ?occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)?. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted thirty-two of our sixty-seven sampled cost transfers (totaling $3,153,441 positive and $2,900,348 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 581 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (21 were between 91 and 180 days past, 6 were between 181 and 270 days past, and 5 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers, we noted the following exceptions: We noted a transaction which was originally recorded to an incorrect object class that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class that did not allow F&A costs to be applied: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that exceeded the amount of the award resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Positive cost transfers were approximately $4,060,000 and negative cost transfers were $3,510,000 during fiscal year 2022. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with activities allowed/unallowed and allowable costs/cost principles. Questioned Cost: Questioned costs are not determinable. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2022, they continued reconciliation procedures related to `grant level? activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday in the previous fiscal year. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual R&D Cluster agreement as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2021 001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University take a fresh look at its processes, policies and internal controls to determine what is needed, post Workday implementation, to prevent and detect noncompliance with activities allowed and unallowed and adherence to allowable cost principles/cost principles. Additionally, we recommend the University determine and address the underlying root cause that is contributing to the volume of cost transfers and take necessary action to prevent unallowable costs from posting to the grant. We also recommend the University consider implementation of an automated control to ensure F&A is charged appropriately when cost transfer entries are made. Lastly, we recommend the University determine what additional Workday automated reporting is available to monitor compliance for personnel expenses, including effort verification reporting, F&A, etc. for activities allowed or unallowed and allowable costs/cost principles.
Finding 2022 001 Federal Program Title ? Research & Development Cluster (R&D) Assistance Listing Nos. ? As listed on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Federal Agencies ? U.S. Department of Agriculture, U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Department of Defense, U.S. Department of Interior, U.S. Department of Justice, Department of State, U.S. Department of Transportation, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, National Endowment for the Humanities, National Science Foundation, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, U.S. Department of Energy, U.S. Department of Education, and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Award Numbers ? As listed on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Grant Award Periods ? Various Compliance Requirement ? Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Criteria: 2 CFR 200.430 includes the standards for documentation of personnel expenses. According to 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1), charges to federal awards for salary and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. Among other requirements within 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1), section (i) states records must be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated and section (v) states that the records must comply with established accounting policies and practices. Also, the HHS Grants Policy for educational institutions requires a plan confirmation system (system) for professorial and other professional staff members that is based on budgeted, planned, or assigned work activity and that is updated to reflect any significant changes in work distribution. The system must be incorporated into the organization?s official records and must identify activity applicable to each sponsored agreement and to each category needed to identify indirect costs and the functions to which they are allocable. At least annually, the employee, principal investigator, or responsible official will verify, by suitable means, that the work was performed and that the salaries and wages charged to sponsored agreements, whether as direct charges or in other categories of cost, are reasonable in relation to the work performed. A system, supported by after-the-fact activity reports, that reflects the distribution of covered employees? activity allocable to each grant and includes identification and recording of significant changes in work activity when initial charges were based on estimates. For professorial and other professional staff members, the activity reports will be prepared each academic term, but at least every 6 months. The University?s `Effort Reporting Policy? states ?Subjects must return the certified effort verification report no later than 30 calendar days after they have been distributed.? Additionally, as set forth in 2 CFR 200, the University is required to ensure allowable costs do not consist of improper payments, including payments that should not have been made or that were made in incorrect amounts (including overpayments and underpayments). Indirect costs are required to adhere to 2 CFR 200, Appendix III. Further, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official. Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and 45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: While performing procedures related to personnel expenses, we noted the University had not followed their `Effort Reporting Policy? which states ?Subjects must return the certified effort verification report no later than 30 calendar days after they have been distributed.? We noted two of our sixty sampled effort reports that had not been returned within the 30-calendar day policy. Total payroll and fringe totaled approximately $13,200,000 during fiscal year 2022. While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted three of forty sampled grants (totaling $3,385,750) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect object class that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class which resulted in overcharges during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 for a total overstatement of $1,888 as noted below: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Additionally, we noted indirect costs were overcharged for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $3,385,750) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect object class during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2021 that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class which resulted in overcharges. These overstatements were corrected during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 for a total of $18,377 as noted below: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2022 totaled approximately $8,360,000. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their `Cost Transfer Policy? which states ?Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis?. The University?s cost transfer policy defines timely as ?occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)?. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted thirty-two of our sixty-seven sampled cost transfers (totaling $3,153,441 positive and $2,900,348 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 581 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (21 were between 91 and 180 days past, 6 were between 181 and 270 days past, and 5 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers, we noted the following exceptions: We noted a transaction which was originally recorded to an incorrect object class that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class that did not allow F&A costs to be applied: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that exceeded the amount of the award resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Positive cost transfers were approximately $4,060,000 and negative cost transfers were $3,510,000 during fiscal year 2022. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with activities allowed/unallowed and allowable costs/cost principles. Questioned Cost: Questioned costs are not determinable. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2022, they continued reconciliation procedures related to `grant level? activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday in the previous fiscal year. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual R&D Cluster agreement as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2021 001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University take a fresh look at its processes, policies and internal controls to determine what is needed, post Workday implementation, to prevent and detect noncompliance with activities allowed and unallowed and adherence to allowable cost principles/cost principles. Additionally, we recommend the University determine and address the underlying root cause that is contributing to the volume of cost transfers and take necessary action to prevent unallowable costs from posting to the grant. We also recommend the University consider implementation of an automated control to ensure F&A is charged appropriately when cost transfer entries are made. Lastly, we recommend the University determine what additional Workday automated reporting is available to monitor compliance for personnel expenses, including effort verification reporting, F&A, etc. for activities allowed or unallowed and allowable costs/cost principles.
Finding 2022 001 Federal Program Title ? Research & Development Cluster (R&D) Assistance Listing Nos. ? As listed on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Federal Agencies ? U.S. Department of Agriculture, U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Department of Defense, U.S. Department of Interior, U.S. Department of Justice, Department of State, U.S. Department of Transportation, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, National Endowment for the Humanities, National Science Foundation, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, U.S. Department of Energy, U.S. Department of Education, and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Award Numbers ? As listed on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Grant Award Periods ? Various Compliance Requirement ? Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Criteria: 2 CFR 200.430 includes the standards for documentation of personnel expenses. According to 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1), charges to federal awards for salary and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. Among other requirements within 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1), section (i) states records must be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated and section (v) states that the records must comply with established accounting policies and practices. Also, the HHS Grants Policy for educational institutions requires a plan confirmation system (system) for professorial and other professional staff members that is based on budgeted, planned, or assigned work activity and that is updated to reflect any significant changes in work distribution. The system must be incorporated into the organization?s official records and must identify activity applicable to each sponsored agreement and to each category needed to identify indirect costs and the functions to which they are allocable. At least annually, the employee, principal investigator, or responsible official will verify, by suitable means, that the work was performed and that the salaries and wages charged to sponsored agreements, whether as direct charges or in other categories of cost, are reasonable in relation to the work performed. A system, supported by after-the-fact activity reports, that reflects the distribution of covered employees? activity allocable to each grant and includes identification and recording of significant changes in work activity when initial charges were based on estimates. For professorial and other professional staff members, the activity reports will be prepared each academic term, but at least every 6 months. The University?s `Effort Reporting Policy? states ?Subjects must return the certified effort verification report no later than 30 calendar days after they have been distributed.? Additionally, as set forth in 2 CFR 200, the University is required to ensure allowable costs do not consist of improper payments, including payments that should not have been made or that were made in incorrect amounts (including overpayments and underpayments). Indirect costs are required to adhere to 2 CFR 200, Appendix III. Further, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official. Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and 45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: While performing procedures related to personnel expenses, we noted the University had not followed their `Effort Reporting Policy? which states ?Subjects must return the certified effort verification report no later than 30 calendar days after they have been distributed.? We noted two of our sixty sampled effort reports that had not been returned within the 30-calendar day policy. Total payroll and fringe totaled approximately $13,200,000 during fiscal year 2022. While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted three of forty sampled grants (totaling $3,385,750) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect object class that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class which resulted in overcharges during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 for a total overstatement of $1,888 as noted below: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Additionally, we noted indirect costs were overcharged for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $3,385,750) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect object class during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2021 that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class which resulted in overcharges. These overstatements were corrected during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 for a total of $18,377 as noted below: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2022 totaled approximately $8,360,000. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their `Cost Transfer Policy? which states ?Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis?. The University?s cost transfer policy defines timely as ?occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)?. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted thirty-two of our sixty-seven sampled cost transfers (totaling $3,153,441 positive and $2,900,348 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 581 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (21 were between 91 and 180 days past, 6 were between 181 and 270 days past, and 5 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers, we noted the following exceptions: We noted a transaction which was originally recorded to an incorrect object class that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class that did not allow F&A costs to be applied: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that exceeded the amount of the award resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Positive cost transfers were approximately $4,060,000 and negative cost transfers were $3,510,000 during fiscal year 2022. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with activities allowed/unallowed and allowable costs/cost principles. Questioned Cost: Questioned costs are not determinable. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2022, they continued reconciliation procedures related to `grant level? activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday in the previous fiscal year. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual R&D Cluster agreement as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2021 001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University take a fresh look at its processes, policies and internal controls to determine what is needed, post Workday implementation, to prevent and detect noncompliance with activities allowed and unallowed and adherence to allowable cost principles/cost principles. Additionally, we recommend the University determine and address the underlying root cause that is contributing to the volume of cost transfers and take necessary action to prevent unallowable costs from posting to the grant. We also recommend the University consider implementation of an automated control to ensure F&A is charged appropriately when cost transfer entries are made. Lastly, we recommend the University determine what additional Workday automated reporting is available to monitor compliance for personnel expenses, including effort verification reporting, F&A, etc. for activities allowed or unallowed and allowable costs/cost principles.
Finding 2022 001 Federal Program Title ? Research & Development Cluster (R&D) Assistance Listing Nos. ? As listed on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Federal Agencies ? U.S. Department of Agriculture, U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Department of Defense, U.S. Department of Interior, U.S. Department of Justice, Department of State, U.S. Department of Transportation, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, National Endowment for the Humanities, National Science Foundation, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, U.S. Department of Energy, U.S. Department of Education, and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Award Numbers ? As listed on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Grant Award Periods ? Various Compliance Requirement ? Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Criteria: 2 CFR 200.430 includes the standards for documentation of personnel expenses. According to 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1), charges to federal awards for salary and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. Among other requirements within 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1), section (i) states records must be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated and section (v) states that the records must comply with established accounting policies and practices. Also, the HHS Grants Policy for educational institutions requires a plan confirmation system (system) for professorial and other professional staff members that is based on budgeted, planned, or assigned work activity and that is updated to reflect any significant changes in work distribution. The system must be incorporated into the organization?s official records and must identify activity applicable to each sponsored agreement and to each category needed to identify indirect costs and the functions to which they are allocable. At least annually, the employee, principal investigator, or responsible official will verify, by suitable means, that the work was performed and that the salaries and wages charged to sponsored agreements, whether as direct charges or in other categories of cost, are reasonable in relation to the work performed. A system, supported by after-the-fact activity reports, that reflects the distribution of covered employees? activity allocable to each grant and includes identification and recording of significant changes in work activity when initial charges were based on estimates. For professorial and other professional staff members, the activity reports will be prepared each academic term, but at least every 6 months. The University?s `Effort Reporting Policy? states ?Subjects must return the certified effort verification report no later than 30 calendar days after they have been distributed.? Additionally, as set forth in 2 CFR 200, the University is required to ensure allowable costs do not consist of improper payments, including payments that should not have been made or that were made in incorrect amounts (including overpayments and underpayments). Indirect costs are required to adhere to 2 CFR 200, Appendix III. Further, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official. Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and 45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: While performing procedures related to personnel expenses, we noted the University had not followed their `Effort Reporting Policy? which states ?Subjects must return the certified effort verification report no later than 30 calendar days after they have been distributed.? We noted two of our sixty sampled effort reports that had not been returned within the 30-calendar day policy. Total payroll and fringe totaled approximately $13,200,000 during fiscal year 2022. While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted three of forty sampled grants (totaling $3,385,750) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect object class that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class which resulted in overcharges during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 for a total overstatement of $1,888 as noted below: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Additionally, we noted indirect costs were overcharged for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $3,385,750) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect object class during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2021 that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class which resulted in overcharges. These overstatements were corrected during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 for a total of $18,377 as noted below: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2022 totaled approximately $8,360,000. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their `Cost Transfer Policy? which states ?Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis?. The University?s cost transfer policy defines timely as ?occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)?. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted thirty-two of our sixty-seven sampled cost transfers (totaling $3,153,441 positive and $2,900,348 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 581 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (21 were between 91 and 180 days past, 6 were between 181 and 270 days past, and 5 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers, we noted the following exceptions: We noted a transaction which was originally recorded to an incorrect object class that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class that did not allow F&A costs to be applied: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that exceeded the amount of the award resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Positive cost transfers were approximately $4,060,000 and negative cost transfers were $3,510,000 during fiscal year 2022. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with activities allowed/unallowed and allowable costs/cost principles. Questioned Cost: Questioned costs are not determinable. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2022, they continued reconciliation procedures related to `grant level? activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday in the previous fiscal year. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual R&D Cluster agreement as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2021 001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University take a fresh look at its processes, policies and internal controls to determine what is needed, post Workday implementation, to prevent and detect noncompliance with activities allowed and unallowed and adherence to allowable cost principles/cost principles. Additionally, we recommend the University determine and address the underlying root cause that is contributing to the volume of cost transfers and take necessary action to prevent unallowable costs from posting to the grant. We also recommend the University consider implementation of an automated control to ensure F&A is charged appropriately when cost transfer entries are made. Lastly, we recommend the University determine what additional Workday automated reporting is available to monitor compliance for personnel expenses, including effort verification reporting, F&A, etc. for activities allowed or unallowed and allowable costs/cost principles.
Finding 2022 001 Federal Program Title ? Research & Development Cluster (R&D) Assistance Listing Nos. ? As listed on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Federal Agencies ? U.S. Department of Agriculture, U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Department of Defense, U.S. Department of Interior, U.S. Department of Justice, Department of State, U.S. Department of Transportation, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, National Endowment for the Humanities, National Science Foundation, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, U.S. Department of Energy, U.S. Department of Education, and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Award Numbers ? As listed on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Grant Award Periods ? Various Compliance Requirement ? Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Criteria: 2 CFR 200.430 includes the standards for documentation of personnel expenses. According to 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1), charges to federal awards for salary and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. Among other requirements within 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1), section (i) states records must be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated and section (v) states that the records must comply with established accounting policies and practices. Also, the HHS Grants Policy for educational institutions requires a plan confirmation system (system) for professorial and other professional staff members that is based on budgeted, planned, or assigned work activity and that is updated to reflect any significant changes in work distribution. The system must be incorporated into the organization?s official records and must identify activity applicable to each sponsored agreement and to each category needed to identify indirect costs and the functions to which they are allocable. At least annually, the employee, principal investigator, or responsible official will verify, by suitable means, that the work was performed and that the salaries and wages charged to sponsored agreements, whether as direct charges or in other categories of cost, are reasonable in relation to the work performed. A system, supported by after-the-fact activity reports, that reflects the distribution of covered employees? activity allocable to each grant and includes identification and recording of significant changes in work activity when initial charges were based on estimates. For professorial and other professional staff members, the activity reports will be prepared each academic term, but at least every 6 months. The University?s `Effort Reporting Policy? states ?Subjects must return the certified effort verification report no later than 30 calendar days after they have been distributed.? Additionally, as set forth in 2 CFR 200, the University is required to ensure allowable costs do not consist of improper payments, including payments that should not have been made or that were made in incorrect amounts (including overpayments and underpayments). Indirect costs are required to adhere to 2 CFR 200, Appendix III. Further, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official. Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and 45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: While performing procedures related to personnel expenses, we noted the University had not followed their `Effort Reporting Policy? which states ?Subjects must return the certified effort verification report no later than 30 calendar days after they have been distributed.? We noted two of our sixty sampled effort reports that had not been returned within the 30-calendar day policy. Total payroll and fringe totaled approximately $13,200,000 during fiscal year 2022. While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted three of forty sampled grants (totaling $3,385,750) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect object class that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class which resulted in overcharges during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 for a total overstatement of $1,888 as noted below: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Additionally, we noted indirect costs were overcharged for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $3,385,750) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect object class during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2021 that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class which resulted in overcharges. These overstatements were corrected during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 for a total of $18,377 as noted below: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2022 totaled approximately $8,360,000. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their `Cost Transfer Policy? which states ?Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis?. The University?s cost transfer policy defines timely as ?occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)?. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted thirty-two of our sixty-seven sampled cost transfers (totaling $3,153,441 positive and $2,900,348 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 581 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (21 were between 91 and 180 days past, 6 were between 181 and 270 days past, and 5 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers, we noted the following exceptions: We noted a transaction which was originally recorded to an incorrect object class that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class that did not allow F&A costs to be applied: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that exceeded the amount of the award resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Positive cost transfers were approximately $4,060,000 and negative cost transfers were $3,510,000 during fiscal year 2022. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with activities allowed/unallowed and allowable costs/cost principles. Questioned Cost: Questioned costs are not determinable. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2022, they continued reconciliation procedures related to `grant level? activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday in the previous fiscal year. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual R&D Cluster agreement as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2021 001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University take a fresh look at its processes, policies and internal controls to determine what is needed, post Workday implementation, to prevent and detect noncompliance with activities allowed and unallowed and adherence to allowable cost principles/cost principles. Additionally, we recommend the University determine and address the underlying root cause that is contributing to the volume of cost transfers and take necessary action to prevent unallowable costs from posting to the grant. We also recommend the University consider implementation of an automated control to ensure F&A is charged appropriately when cost transfer entries are made. Lastly, we recommend the University determine what additional Workday automated reporting is available to monitor compliance for personnel expenses, including effort verification reporting, F&A, etc. for activities allowed or unallowed and allowable costs/cost principles.
Finding 2022 001 Federal Program Title ? Research & Development Cluster (R&D) Assistance Listing Nos. ? As listed on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Federal Agencies ? U.S. Department of Agriculture, U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Department of Defense, U.S. Department of Interior, U.S. Department of Justice, Department of State, U.S. Department of Transportation, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, National Endowment for the Humanities, National Science Foundation, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, U.S. Department of Energy, U.S. Department of Education, and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Award Numbers ? As listed on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Grant Award Periods ? Various Compliance Requirement ? Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Criteria: 2 CFR 200.430 includes the standards for documentation of personnel expenses. According to 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1), charges to federal awards for salary and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. Among other requirements within 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1), section (i) states records must be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated and section (v) states that the records must comply with established accounting policies and practices. Also, the HHS Grants Policy for educational institutions requires a plan confirmation system (system) for professorial and other professional staff members that is based on budgeted, planned, or assigned work activity and that is updated to reflect any significant changes in work distribution. The system must be incorporated into the organization?s official records and must identify activity applicable to each sponsored agreement and to each category needed to identify indirect costs and the functions to which they are allocable. At least annually, the employee, principal investigator, or responsible official will verify, by suitable means, that the work was performed and that the salaries and wages charged to sponsored agreements, whether as direct charges or in other categories of cost, are reasonable in relation to the work performed. A system, supported by after-the-fact activity reports, that reflects the distribution of covered employees? activity allocable to each grant and includes identification and recording of significant changes in work activity when initial charges were based on estimates. For professorial and other professional staff members, the activity reports will be prepared each academic term, but at least every 6 months. The University?s `Effort Reporting Policy? states ?Subjects must return the certified effort verification report no later than 30 calendar days after they have been distributed.? Additionally, as set forth in 2 CFR 200, the University is required to ensure allowable costs do not consist of improper payments, including payments that should not have been made or that were made in incorrect amounts (including overpayments and underpayments). Indirect costs are required to adhere to 2 CFR 200, Appendix III. Further, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official. Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and 45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: While performing procedures related to personnel expenses, we noted the University had not followed their `Effort Reporting Policy? which states ?Subjects must return the certified effort verification report no later than 30 calendar days after they have been distributed.? We noted two of our sixty sampled effort reports that had not been returned within the 30-calendar day policy. Total payroll and fringe totaled approximately $13,200,000 during fiscal year 2022. While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted three of forty sampled grants (totaling $3,385,750) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect object class that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class which resulted in overcharges during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 for a total overstatement of $1,888 as noted below: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Additionally, we noted indirect costs were overcharged for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $3,385,750) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect object class during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2021 that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class which resulted in overcharges. These overstatements were corrected during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 for a total of $18,377 as noted below: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2022 totaled approximately $8,360,000. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their `Cost Transfer Policy? which states ?Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis?. The University?s cost transfer policy defines timely as ?occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)?. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted thirty-two of our sixty-seven sampled cost transfers (totaling $3,153,441 positive and $2,900,348 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 581 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (21 were between 91 and 180 days past, 6 were between 181 and 270 days past, and 5 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers, we noted the following exceptions: We noted a transaction which was originally recorded to an incorrect object class that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class that did not allow F&A costs to be applied: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that exceeded the amount of the award resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Positive cost transfers were approximately $4,060,000 and negative cost transfers were $3,510,000 during fiscal year 2022. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with activities allowed/unallowed and allowable costs/cost principles. Questioned Cost: Questioned costs are not determinable. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2022, they continued reconciliation procedures related to `grant level? activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday in the previous fiscal year. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual R&D Cluster agreement as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2021 001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University take a fresh look at its processes, policies and internal controls to determine what is needed, post Workday implementation, to prevent and detect noncompliance with activities allowed and unallowed and adherence to allowable cost principles/cost principles. Additionally, we recommend the University determine and address the underlying root cause that is contributing to the volume of cost transfers and take necessary action to prevent unallowable costs from posting to the grant. We also recommend the University consider implementation of an automated control to ensure F&A is charged appropriately when cost transfer entries are made. Lastly, we recommend the University determine what additional Workday automated reporting is available to monitor compliance for personnel expenses, including effort verification reporting, F&A, etc. for activities allowed or unallowed and allowable costs/cost principles.
Finding 2022 001 Federal Program Title ? Research & Development Cluster (R&D) Assistance Listing Nos. ? As listed on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Federal Agencies ? U.S. Department of Agriculture, U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Department of Defense, U.S. Department of Interior, U.S. Department of Justice, Department of State, U.S. Department of Transportation, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, National Endowment for the Humanities, National Science Foundation, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, U.S. Department of Energy, U.S. Department of Education, and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Award Numbers ? As listed on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Grant Award Periods ? Various Compliance Requirement ? Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Criteria: 2 CFR 200.430 includes the standards for documentation of personnel expenses. According to 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1), charges to federal awards for salary and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. Among other requirements within 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1), section (i) states records must be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated and section (v) states that the records must comply with established accounting policies and practices. Also, the HHS Grants Policy for educational institutions requires a plan confirmation system (system) for professorial and other professional staff members that is based on budgeted, planned, or assigned work activity and that is updated to reflect any significant changes in work distribution. The system must be incorporated into the organization?s official records and must identify activity applicable to each sponsored agreement and to each category needed to identify indirect costs and the functions to which they are allocable. At least annually, the employee, principal investigator, or responsible official will verify, by suitable means, that the work was performed and that the salaries and wages charged to sponsored agreements, whether as direct charges or in other categories of cost, are reasonable in relation to the work performed. A system, supported by after-the-fact activity reports, that reflects the distribution of covered employees? activity allocable to each grant and includes identification and recording of significant changes in work activity when initial charges were based on estimates. For professorial and other professional staff members, the activity reports will be prepared each academic term, but at least every 6 months. The University?s `Effort Reporting Policy? states ?Subjects must return the certified effort verification report no later than 30 calendar days after they have been distributed.? Additionally, as set forth in 2 CFR 200, the University is required to ensure allowable costs do not consist of improper payments, including payments that should not have been made or that were made in incorrect amounts (including overpayments and underpayments). Indirect costs are required to adhere to 2 CFR 200, Appendix III. Further, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official. Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and 45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: While performing procedures related to personnel expenses, we noted the University had not followed their `Effort Reporting Policy? which states ?Subjects must return the certified effort verification report no later than 30 calendar days after they have been distributed.? We noted two of our sixty sampled effort reports that had not been returned within the 30-calendar day policy. Total payroll and fringe totaled approximately $13,200,000 during fiscal year 2022. While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted three of forty sampled grants (totaling $3,385,750) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect object class that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class which resulted in overcharges during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 for a total overstatement of $1,888 as noted below: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Additionally, we noted indirect costs were overcharged for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $3,385,750) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect object class during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2021 that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class which resulted in overcharges. These overstatements were corrected during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 for a total of $18,377 as noted below: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2022 totaled approximately $8,360,000. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their `Cost Transfer Policy? which states ?Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis?. The University?s cost transfer policy defines timely as ?occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)?. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted thirty-two of our sixty-seven sampled cost transfers (totaling $3,153,441 positive and $2,900,348 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 581 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (21 were between 91 and 180 days past, 6 were between 181 and 270 days past, and 5 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers, we noted the following exceptions: We noted a transaction which was originally recorded to an incorrect object class that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class that did not allow F&A costs to be applied: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that exceeded the amount of the award resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Positive cost transfers were approximately $4,060,000 and negative cost transfers were $3,510,000 during fiscal year 2022. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with activities allowed/unallowed and allowable costs/cost principles. Questioned Cost: Questioned costs are not determinable. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2022, they continued reconciliation procedures related to `grant level? activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday in the previous fiscal year. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual R&D Cluster agreement as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2021 001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University take a fresh look at its processes, policies and internal controls to determine what is needed, post Workday implementation, to prevent and detect noncompliance with activities allowed and unallowed and adherence to allowable cost principles/cost principles. Additionally, we recommend the University determine and address the underlying root cause that is contributing to the volume of cost transfers and take necessary action to prevent unallowable costs from posting to the grant. We also recommend the University consider implementation of an automated control to ensure F&A is charged appropriately when cost transfer entries are made. Lastly, we recommend the University determine what additional Workday automated reporting is available to monitor compliance for personnel expenses, including effort verification reporting, F&A, etc. for activities allowed or unallowed and allowable costs/cost principles.
Finding 2022 001 Federal Program Title ? Research & Development Cluster (R&D) Assistance Listing Nos. ? As listed on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Federal Agencies ? U.S. Department of Agriculture, U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Department of Defense, U.S. Department of Interior, U.S. Department of Justice, Department of State, U.S. Department of Transportation, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, National Endowment for the Humanities, National Science Foundation, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, U.S. Department of Energy, U.S. Department of Education, and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Award Numbers ? As listed on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Grant Award Periods ? Various Compliance Requirement ? Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Criteria: 2 CFR 200.430 includes the standards for documentation of personnel expenses. According to 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1), charges to federal awards for salary and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. Among other requirements within 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1), section (i) states records must be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated and section (v) states that the records must comply with established accounting policies and practices. Also, the HHS Grants Policy for educational institutions requires a plan confirmation system (system) for professorial and other professional staff members that is based on budgeted, planned, or assigned work activity and that is updated to reflect any significant changes in work distribution. The system must be incorporated into the organization?s official records and must identify activity applicable to each sponsored agreement and to each category needed to identify indirect costs and the functions to which they are allocable. At least annually, the employee, principal investigator, or responsible official will verify, by suitable means, that the work was performed and that the salaries and wages charged to sponsored agreements, whether as direct charges or in other categories of cost, are reasonable in relation to the work performed. A system, supported by after-the-fact activity reports, that reflects the distribution of covered employees? activity allocable to each grant and includes identification and recording of significant changes in work activity when initial charges were based on estimates. For professorial and other professional staff members, the activity reports will be prepared each academic term, but at least every 6 months. The University?s `Effort Reporting Policy? states ?Subjects must return the certified effort verification report no later than 30 calendar days after they have been distributed.? Additionally, as set forth in 2 CFR 200, the University is required to ensure allowable costs do not consist of improper payments, including payments that should not have been made or that were made in incorrect amounts (including overpayments and underpayments). Indirect costs are required to adhere to 2 CFR 200, Appendix III. Further, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official. Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and 45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: While performing procedures related to personnel expenses, we noted the University had not followed their `Effort Reporting Policy? which states ?Subjects must return the certified effort verification report no later than 30 calendar days after they have been distributed.? We noted two of our sixty sampled effort reports that had not been returned within the 30-calendar day policy. Total payroll and fringe totaled approximately $13,200,000 during fiscal year 2022. While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted three of forty sampled grants (totaling $3,385,750) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect object class that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class which resulted in overcharges during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 for a total overstatement of $1,888 as noted below: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Additionally, we noted indirect costs were overcharged for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $3,385,750) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect object class during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2021 that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class which resulted in overcharges. These overstatements were corrected during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 for a total of $18,377 as noted below: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2022 totaled approximately $8,360,000. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their `Cost Transfer Policy? which states ?Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis?. The University?s cost transfer policy defines timely as ?occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)?. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted thirty-two of our sixty-seven sampled cost transfers (totaling $3,153,441 positive and $2,900,348 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 581 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (21 were between 91 and 180 days past, 6 were between 181 and 270 days past, and 5 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers, we noted the following exceptions: We noted a transaction which was originally recorded to an incorrect object class that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class that did not allow F&A costs to be applied: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that exceeded the amount of the award resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Positive cost transfers were approximately $4,060,000 and negative cost transfers were $3,510,000 during fiscal year 2022. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with activities allowed/unallowed and allowable costs/cost principles. Questioned Cost: Questioned costs are not determinable. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2022, they continued reconciliation procedures related to `grant level? activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday in the previous fiscal year. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual R&D Cluster agreement as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2021 001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University take a fresh look at its processes, policies and internal controls to determine what is needed, post Workday implementation, to prevent and detect noncompliance with activities allowed and unallowed and adherence to allowable cost principles/cost principles. Additionally, we recommend the University determine and address the underlying root cause that is contributing to the volume of cost transfers and take necessary action to prevent unallowable costs from posting to the grant. We also recommend the University consider implementation of an automated control to ensure F&A is charged appropriately when cost transfer entries are made. Lastly, we recommend the University determine what additional Workday automated reporting is available to monitor compliance for personnel expenses, including effort verification reporting, F&A, etc. for activities allowed or unallowed and allowable costs/cost principles.
Finding 2022 001 Federal Program Title ? Research & Development Cluster (R&D) Assistance Listing Nos. ? As listed on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Federal Agencies ? U.S. Department of Agriculture, U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Department of Defense, U.S. Department of Interior, U.S. Department of Justice, Department of State, U.S. Department of Transportation, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, National Endowment for the Humanities, National Science Foundation, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, U.S. Department of Energy, U.S. Department of Education, and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Award Numbers ? As listed on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Grant Award Periods ? Various Compliance Requirement ? Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Criteria: 2 CFR 200.430 includes the standards for documentation of personnel expenses. According to 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1), charges to federal awards for salary and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. Among other requirements within 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1), section (i) states records must be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated and section (v) states that the records must comply with established accounting policies and practices. Also, the HHS Grants Policy for educational institutions requires a plan confirmation system (system) for professorial and other professional staff members that is based on budgeted, planned, or assigned work activity and that is updated to reflect any significant changes in work distribution. The system must be incorporated into the organization?s official records and must identify activity applicable to each sponsored agreement and to each category needed to identify indirect costs and the functions to which they are allocable. At least annually, the employee, principal investigator, or responsible official will verify, by suitable means, that the work was performed and that the salaries and wages charged to sponsored agreements, whether as direct charges or in other categories of cost, are reasonable in relation to the work performed. A system, supported by after-the-fact activity reports, that reflects the distribution of covered employees? activity allocable to each grant and includes identification and recording of significant changes in work activity when initial charges were based on estimates. For professorial and other professional staff members, the activity reports will be prepared each academic term, but at least every 6 months. The University?s `Effort Reporting Policy? states ?Subjects must return the certified effort verification report no later than 30 calendar days after they have been distributed.? Additionally, as set forth in 2 CFR 200, the University is required to ensure allowable costs do not consist of improper payments, including payments that should not have been made or that were made in incorrect amounts (including overpayments and underpayments). Indirect costs are required to adhere to 2 CFR 200, Appendix III. Further, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official. Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and 45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: While performing procedures related to personnel expenses, we noted the University had not followed their `Effort Reporting Policy? which states ?Subjects must return the certified effort verification report no later than 30 calendar days after they have been distributed.? We noted two of our sixty sampled effort reports that had not been returned within the 30-calendar day policy. Total payroll and fringe totaled approximately $13,200,000 during fiscal year 2022. While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted three of forty sampled grants (totaling $3,385,750) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect object class that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class which resulted in overcharges during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 for a total overstatement of $1,888 as noted below: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Additionally, we noted indirect costs were overcharged for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $3,385,750) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect object class during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2021 that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class which resulted in overcharges. These overstatements were corrected during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 for a total of $18,377 as noted below: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2022 totaled approximately $8,360,000. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their `Cost Transfer Policy? which states ?Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis?. The University?s cost transfer policy defines timely as ?occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)?. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted thirty-two of our sixty-seven sampled cost transfers (totaling $3,153,441 positive and $2,900,348 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 581 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (21 were between 91 and 180 days past, 6 were between 181 and 270 days past, and 5 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers, we noted the following exceptions: We noted a transaction which was originally recorded to an incorrect object class that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class that did not allow F&A costs to be applied: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that exceeded the amount of the award resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Positive cost transfers were approximately $4,060,000 and negative cost transfers were $3,510,000 during fiscal year 2022. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with activities allowed/unallowed and allowable costs/cost principles. Questioned Cost: Questioned costs are not determinable. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2022, they continued reconciliation procedures related to `grant level? activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday in the previous fiscal year. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual R&D Cluster agreement as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2021 001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University take a fresh look at its processes, policies and internal controls to determine what is needed, post Workday implementation, to prevent and detect noncompliance with activities allowed and unallowed and adherence to allowable cost principles/cost principles. Additionally, we recommend the University determine and address the underlying root cause that is contributing to the volume of cost transfers and take necessary action to prevent unallowable costs from posting to the grant. We also recommend the University consider implementation of an automated control to ensure F&A is charged appropriately when cost transfer entries are made. Lastly, we recommend the University determine what additional Workday automated reporting is available to monitor compliance for personnel expenses, including effort verification reporting, F&A, etc. for activities allowed or unallowed and allowable costs/cost principles.
Finding 2022 001 Federal Program Title ? Research & Development Cluster (R&D) Assistance Listing Nos. ? As listed on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Federal Agencies ? U.S. Department of Agriculture, U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Department of Defense, U.S. Department of Interior, U.S. Department of Justice, Department of State, U.S. Department of Transportation, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, National Endowment for the Humanities, National Science Foundation, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, U.S. Department of Energy, U.S. Department of Education, and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Award Numbers ? As listed on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Grant Award Periods ? Various Compliance Requirement ? Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Criteria: 2 CFR 200.430 includes the standards for documentation of personnel expenses. According to 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1), charges to federal awards for salary and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. Among other requirements within 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1), section (i) states records must be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated and section (v) states that the records must comply with established accounting policies and practices. Also, the HHS Grants Policy for educational institutions requires a plan confirmation system (system) for professorial and other professional staff members that is based on budgeted, planned, or assigned work activity and that is updated to reflect any significant changes in work distribution. The system must be incorporated into the organization?s official records and must identify activity applicable to each sponsored agreement and to each category needed to identify indirect costs and the functions to which they are allocable. At least annually, the employee, principal investigator, or responsible official will verify, by suitable means, that the work was performed and that the salaries and wages charged to sponsored agreements, whether as direct charges or in other categories of cost, are reasonable in relation to the work performed. A system, supported by after-the-fact activity reports, that reflects the distribution of covered employees? activity allocable to each grant and includes identification and recording of significant changes in work activity when initial charges were based on estimates. For professorial and other professional staff members, the activity reports will be prepared each academic term, but at least every 6 months. The University?s `Effort Reporting Policy? states ?Subjects must return the certified effort verification report no later than 30 calendar days after they have been distributed.? Additionally, as set forth in 2 CFR 200, the University is required to ensure allowable costs do not consist of improper payments, including payments that should not have been made or that were made in incorrect amounts (including overpayments and underpayments). Indirect costs are required to adhere to 2 CFR 200, Appendix III. Further, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official. Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and 45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: While performing procedures related to personnel expenses, we noted the University had not followed their `Effort Reporting Policy? which states ?Subjects must return the certified effort verification report no later than 30 calendar days after they have been distributed.? We noted two of our sixty sampled effort reports that had not been returned within the 30-calendar day policy. Total payroll and fringe totaled approximately $13,200,000 during fiscal year 2022. While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted three of forty sampled grants (totaling $3,385,750) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect object class that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class which resulted in overcharges during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 for a total overstatement of $1,888 as noted below: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Additionally, we noted indirect costs were overcharged for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $3,385,750) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect object class during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2021 that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class which resulted in overcharges. These overstatements were corrected during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 for a total of $18,377 as noted below: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2022 totaled approximately $8,360,000. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their `Cost Transfer Policy? which states ?Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis?. The University?s cost transfer policy defines timely as ?occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)?. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted thirty-two of our sixty-seven sampled cost transfers (totaling $3,153,441 positive and $2,900,348 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 581 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (21 were between 91 and 180 days past, 6 were between 181 and 270 days past, and 5 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers, we noted the following exceptions: We noted a transaction which was originally recorded to an incorrect object class that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class that did not allow F&A costs to be applied: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that exceeded the amount of the award resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Positive cost transfers were approximately $4,060,000 and negative cost transfers were $3,510,000 during fiscal year 2022. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with activities allowed/unallowed and allowable costs/cost principles. Questioned Cost: Questioned costs are not determinable. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2022, they continued reconciliation procedures related to `grant level? activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday in the previous fiscal year. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual R&D Cluster agreement as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2021 001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University take a fresh look at its processes, policies and internal controls to determine what is needed, post Workday implementation, to prevent and detect noncompliance with activities allowed and unallowed and adherence to allowable cost principles/cost principles. Additionally, we recommend the University determine and address the underlying root cause that is contributing to the volume of cost transfers and take necessary action to prevent unallowable costs from posting to the grant. We also recommend the University consider implementation of an automated control to ensure F&A is charged appropriately when cost transfer entries are made. Lastly, we recommend the University determine what additional Workday automated reporting is available to monitor compliance for personnel expenses, including effort verification reporting, F&A, etc. for activities allowed or unallowed and allowable costs/cost principles.
Finding 2022 001 Federal Program Title ? Research & Development Cluster (R&D) Assistance Listing Nos. ? As listed on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Federal Agencies ? U.S. Department of Agriculture, U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Department of Defense, U.S. Department of Interior, U.S. Department of Justice, Department of State, U.S. Department of Transportation, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, National Endowment for the Humanities, National Science Foundation, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, U.S. Department of Energy, U.S. Department of Education, and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Award Numbers ? As listed on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Grant Award Periods ? Various Compliance Requirement ? Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Criteria: 2 CFR 200.430 includes the standards for documentation of personnel expenses. According to 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1), charges to federal awards for salary and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. Among other requirements within 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1), section (i) states records must be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated and section (v) states that the records must comply with established accounting policies and practices. Also, the HHS Grants Policy for educational institutions requires a plan confirmation system (system) for professorial and other professional staff members that is based on budgeted, planned, or assigned work activity and that is updated to reflect any significant changes in work distribution. The system must be incorporated into the organization?s official records and must identify activity applicable to each sponsored agreement and to each category needed to identify indirect costs and the functions to which they are allocable. At least annually, the employee, principal investigator, or responsible official will verify, by suitable means, that the work was performed and that the salaries and wages charged to sponsored agreements, whether as direct charges or in other categories of cost, are reasonable in relation to the work performed. A system, supported by after-the-fact activity reports, that reflects the distribution of covered employees? activity allocable to each grant and includes identification and recording of significant changes in work activity when initial charges were based on estimates. For professorial and other professional staff members, the activity reports will be prepared each academic term, but at least every 6 months. The University?s `Effort Reporting Policy? states ?Subjects must return the certified effort verification report no later than 30 calendar days after they have been distributed.? Additionally, as set forth in 2 CFR 200, the University is required to ensure allowable costs do not consist of improper payments, including payments that should not have been made or that were made in incorrect amounts (including overpayments and underpayments). Indirect costs are required to adhere to 2 CFR 200, Appendix III. Further, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official. Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and 45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: While performing procedures related to personnel expenses, we noted the University had not followed their `Effort Reporting Policy? which states ?Subjects must return the certified effort verification report no later than 30 calendar days after they have been distributed.? We noted two of our sixty sampled effort reports that had not been returned within the 30-calendar day policy. Total payroll and fringe totaled approximately $13,200,000 during fiscal year 2022. While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted three of forty sampled grants (totaling $3,385,750) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect object class that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class which resulted in overcharges during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 for a total overstatement of $1,888 as noted below: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Additionally, we noted indirect costs were overcharged for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $3,385,750) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect object class during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2021 that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class which resulted in overcharges. These overstatements were corrected during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 for a total of $18,377 as noted below: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2022 totaled approximately $8,360,000. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their `Cost Transfer Policy? which states ?Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis?. The University?s cost transfer policy defines timely as ?occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)?. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted thirty-two of our sixty-seven sampled cost transfers (totaling $3,153,441 positive and $2,900,348 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 581 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (21 were between 91 and 180 days past, 6 were between 181 and 270 days past, and 5 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers, we noted the following exceptions: We noted a transaction which was originally recorded to an incorrect object class that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class that did not allow F&A costs to be applied: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that exceeded the amount of the award resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Positive cost transfers were approximately $4,060,000 and negative cost transfers were $3,510,000 during fiscal year 2022. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with activities allowed/unallowed and allowable costs/cost principles. Questioned Cost: Questioned costs are not determinable. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2022, they continued reconciliation procedures related to `grant level? activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday in the previous fiscal year. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual R&D Cluster agreement as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2021 001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University take a fresh look at its processes, policies and internal controls to determine what is needed, post Workday implementation, to prevent and detect noncompliance with activities allowed and unallowed and adherence to allowable cost principles/cost principles. Additionally, we recommend the University determine and address the underlying root cause that is contributing to the volume of cost transfers and take necessary action to prevent unallowable costs from posting to the grant. We also recommend the University consider implementation of an automated control to ensure F&A is charged appropriately when cost transfer entries are made. Lastly, we recommend the University determine what additional Workday automated reporting is available to monitor compliance for personnel expenses, including effort verification reporting, F&A, etc. for activities allowed or unallowed and allowable costs/cost principles.
Finding 2022 001 Federal Program Title ? Research & Development Cluster (R&D) Assistance Listing Nos. ? As listed on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Federal Agencies ? U.S. Department of Agriculture, U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Department of Defense, U.S. Department of Interior, U.S. Department of Justice, Department of State, U.S. Department of Transportation, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, National Endowment for the Humanities, National Science Foundation, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, U.S. Department of Energy, U.S. Department of Education, and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Award Numbers ? As listed on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Grant Award Periods ? Various Compliance Requirement ? Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Criteria: 2 CFR 200.430 includes the standards for documentation of personnel expenses. According to 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1), charges to federal awards for salary and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. Among other requirements within 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1), section (i) states records must be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated and section (v) states that the records must comply with established accounting policies and practices. Also, the HHS Grants Policy for educational institutions requires a plan confirmation system (system) for professorial and other professional staff members that is based on budgeted, planned, or assigned work activity and that is updated to reflect any significant changes in work distribution. The system must be incorporated into the organization?s official records and must identify activity applicable to each sponsored agreement and to each category needed to identify indirect costs and the functions to which they are allocable. At least annually, the employee, principal investigator, or responsible official will verify, by suitable means, that the work was performed and that the salaries and wages charged to sponsored agreements, whether as direct charges or in other categories of cost, are reasonable in relation to the work performed. A system, supported by after-the-fact activity reports, that reflects the distribution of covered employees? activity allocable to each grant and includes identification and recording of significant changes in work activity when initial charges were based on estimates. For professorial and other professional staff members, the activity reports will be prepared each academic term, but at least every 6 months. The University?s `Effort Reporting Policy? states ?Subjects must return the certified effort verification report no later than 30 calendar days after they have been distributed.? Additionally, as set forth in 2 CFR 200, the University is required to ensure allowable costs do not consist of improper payments, including payments that should not have been made or that were made in incorrect amounts (including overpayments and underpayments). Indirect costs are required to adhere to 2 CFR 200, Appendix III. Further, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official. Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and 45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: While performing procedures related to personnel expenses, we noted the University had not followed their `Effort Reporting Policy? which states ?Subjects must return the certified effort verification report no later than 30 calendar days after they have been distributed.? We noted two of our sixty sampled effort reports that had not been returned within the 30-calendar day policy. Total payroll and fringe totaled approximately $13,200,000 during fiscal year 2022. While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted three of forty sampled grants (totaling $3,385,750) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect object class that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class which resulted in overcharges during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 for a total overstatement of $1,888 as noted below: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Additionally, we noted indirect costs were overcharged for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $3,385,750) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect object class during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2021 that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class which resulted in overcharges. These overstatements were corrected during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 for a total of $18,377 as noted below: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2022 totaled approximately $8,360,000. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their `Cost Transfer Policy? which states ?Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis?. The University?s cost transfer policy defines timely as ?occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)?. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted thirty-two of our sixty-seven sampled cost transfers (totaling $3,153,441 positive and $2,900,348 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 581 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (21 were between 91 and 180 days past, 6 were between 181 and 270 days past, and 5 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers, we noted the following exceptions: We noted a transaction which was originally recorded to an incorrect object class that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class that did not allow F&A costs to be applied: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that exceeded the amount of the award resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Positive cost transfers were approximately $4,060,000 and negative cost transfers were $3,510,000 during fiscal year 2022. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with activities allowed/unallowed and allowable costs/cost principles. Questioned Cost: Questioned costs are not determinable. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2022, they continued reconciliation procedures related to `grant level? activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday in the previous fiscal year. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual R&D Cluster agreement as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2021 001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University take a fresh look at its processes, policies and internal controls to determine what is needed, post Workday implementation, to prevent and detect noncompliance with activities allowed and unallowed and adherence to allowable cost principles/cost principles. Additionally, we recommend the University determine and address the underlying root cause that is contributing to the volume of cost transfers and take necessary action to prevent unallowable costs from posting to the grant. We also recommend the University consider implementation of an automated control to ensure F&A is charged appropriately when cost transfer entries are made. Lastly, we recommend the University determine what additional Workday automated reporting is available to monitor compliance for personnel expenses, including effort verification reporting, F&A, etc. for activities allowed or unallowed and allowable costs/cost principles.
Finding 2022 001 Federal Program Title ? Research & Development Cluster (R&D) Assistance Listing Nos. ? As listed on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Federal Agencies ? U.S. Department of Agriculture, U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Department of Defense, U.S. Department of Interior, U.S. Department of Justice, Department of State, U.S. Department of Transportation, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, National Endowment for the Humanities, National Science Foundation, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, U.S. Department of Energy, U.S. Department of Education, and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Award Numbers ? As listed on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Grant Award Periods ? Various Compliance Requirement ? Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Criteria: 2 CFR 200.430 includes the standards for documentation of personnel expenses. According to 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1), charges to federal awards for salary and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. Among other requirements within 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1), section (i) states records must be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated and section (v) states that the records must comply with established accounting policies and practices. Also, the HHS Grants Policy for educational institutions requires a plan confirmation system (system) for professorial and other professional staff members that is based on budgeted, planned, or assigned work activity and that is updated to reflect any significant changes in work distribution. The system must be incorporated into the organization?s official records and must identify activity applicable to each sponsored agreement and to each category needed to identify indirect costs and the functions to which they are allocable. At least annually, the employee, principal investigator, or responsible official will verify, by suitable means, that the work was performed and that the salaries and wages charged to sponsored agreements, whether as direct charges or in other categories of cost, are reasonable in relation to the work performed. A system, supported by after-the-fact activity reports, that reflects the distribution of covered employees? activity allocable to each grant and includes identification and recording of significant changes in work activity when initial charges were based on estimates. For professorial and other professional staff members, the activity reports will be prepared each academic term, but at least every 6 months. The University?s `Effort Reporting Policy? states ?Subjects must return the certified effort verification report no later than 30 calendar days after they have been distributed.? Additionally, as set forth in 2 CFR 200, the University is required to ensure allowable costs do not consist of improper payments, including payments that should not have been made or that were made in incorrect amounts (including overpayments and underpayments). Indirect costs are required to adhere to 2 CFR 200, Appendix III. Further, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official. Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and 45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: While performing procedures related to personnel expenses, we noted the University had not followed their `Effort Reporting Policy? which states ?Subjects must return the certified effort verification report no later than 30 calendar days after they have been distributed.? We noted two of our sixty sampled effort reports that had not been returned within the 30-calendar day policy. Total payroll and fringe totaled approximately $13,200,000 during fiscal year 2022. While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted three of forty sampled grants (totaling $3,385,750) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect object class that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class which resulted in overcharges during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 for a total overstatement of $1,888 as noted below: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Additionally, we noted indirect costs were overcharged for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $3,385,750) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect object class during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2021 that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class which resulted in overcharges. These overstatements were corrected during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 for a total of $18,377 as noted below: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2022 totaled approximately $8,360,000. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their `Cost Transfer Policy? which states ?Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis?. The University?s cost transfer policy defines timely as ?occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)?. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted thirty-two of our sixty-seven sampled cost transfers (totaling $3,153,441 positive and $2,900,348 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 581 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (21 were between 91 and 180 days past, 6 were between 181 and 270 days past, and 5 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers, we noted the following exceptions: We noted a transaction which was originally recorded to an incorrect object class that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class that did not allow F&A costs to be applied: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that exceeded the amount of the award resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Positive cost transfers were approximately $4,060,000 and negative cost transfers were $3,510,000 during fiscal year 2022. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with activities allowed/unallowed and allowable costs/cost principles. Questioned Cost: Questioned costs are not determinable. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2022, they continued reconciliation procedures related to `grant level? activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday in the previous fiscal year. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual R&D Cluster agreement as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2021 001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University take a fresh look at its processes, policies and internal controls to determine what is needed, post Workday implementation, to prevent and detect noncompliance with activities allowed and unallowed and adherence to allowable cost principles/cost principles. Additionally, we recommend the University determine and address the underlying root cause that is contributing to the volume of cost transfers and take necessary action to prevent unallowable costs from posting to the grant. We also recommend the University consider implementation of an automated control to ensure F&A is charged appropriately when cost transfer entries are made. Lastly, we recommend the University determine what additional Workday automated reporting is available to monitor compliance for personnel expenses, including effort verification reporting, F&A, etc. for activities allowed or unallowed and allowable costs/cost principles.
Finding 2022 001 Federal Program Title ? Research & Development Cluster (R&D) Assistance Listing Nos. ? As listed on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Federal Agencies ? U.S. Department of Agriculture, U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Department of Defense, U.S. Department of Interior, U.S. Department of Justice, Department of State, U.S. Department of Transportation, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, National Endowment for the Humanities, National Science Foundation, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, U.S. Department of Energy, U.S. Department of Education, and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Award Numbers ? As listed on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Grant Award Periods ? Various Compliance Requirement ? Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Criteria: 2 CFR 200.430 includes the standards for documentation of personnel expenses. According to 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1), charges to federal awards for salary and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. Among other requirements within 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1), section (i) states records must be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated and section (v) states that the records must comply with established accounting policies and practices. Also, the HHS Grants Policy for educational institutions requires a plan confirmation system (system) for professorial and other professional staff members that is based on budgeted, planned, or assigned work activity and that is updated to reflect any significant changes in work distribution. The system must be incorporated into the organization?s official records and must identify activity applicable to each sponsored agreement and to each category needed to identify indirect costs and the functions to which they are allocable. At least annually, the employee, principal investigator, or responsible official will verify, by suitable means, that the work was performed and that the salaries and wages charged to sponsored agreements, whether as direct charges or in other categories of cost, are reasonable in relation to the work performed. A system, supported by after-the-fact activity reports, that reflects the distribution of covered employees? activity allocable to each grant and includes identification and recording of significant changes in work activity when initial charges were based on estimates. For professorial and other professional staff members, the activity reports will be prepared each academic term, but at least every 6 months. The University?s `Effort Reporting Policy? states ?Subjects must return the certified effort verification report no later than 30 calendar days after they have been distributed.? Additionally, as set forth in 2 CFR 200, the University is required to ensure allowable costs do not consist of improper payments, including payments that should not have been made or that were made in incorrect amounts (including overpayments and underpayments). Indirect costs are required to adhere to 2 CFR 200, Appendix III. Further, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official. Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and 45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: While performing procedures related to personnel expenses, we noted the University had not followed their `Effort Reporting Policy? which states ?Subjects must return the certified effort verification report no later than 30 calendar days after they have been distributed.? We noted two of our sixty sampled effort reports that had not been returned within the 30-calendar day policy. Total payroll and fringe totaled approximately $13,200,000 during fiscal year 2022. While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted three of forty sampled grants (totaling $3,385,750) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect object class that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class which resulted in overcharges during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 for a total overstatement of $1,888 as noted below: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Additionally, we noted indirect costs were overcharged for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $3,385,750) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect object class during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2021 that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class which resulted in overcharges. These overstatements were corrected during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 for a total of $18,377 as noted below: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2022 totaled approximately $8,360,000. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their `Cost Transfer Policy? which states ?Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis?. The University?s cost transfer policy defines timely as ?occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)?. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted thirty-two of our sixty-seven sampled cost transfers (totaling $3,153,441 positive and $2,900,348 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 581 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (21 were between 91 and 180 days past, 6 were between 181 and 270 days past, and 5 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers, we noted the following exceptions: We noted a transaction which was originally recorded to an incorrect object class that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class that did not allow F&A costs to be applied: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that exceeded the amount of the award resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Positive cost transfers were approximately $4,060,000 and negative cost transfers were $3,510,000 during fiscal year 2022. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with activities allowed/unallowed and allowable costs/cost principles. Questioned Cost: Questioned costs are not determinable. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2022, they continued reconciliation procedures related to `grant level? activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday in the previous fiscal year. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual R&D Cluster agreement as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2021 001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University take a fresh look at its processes, policies and internal controls to determine what is needed, post Workday implementation, to prevent and detect noncompliance with activities allowed and unallowed and adherence to allowable cost principles/cost principles. Additionally, we recommend the University determine and address the underlying root cause that is contributing to the volume of cost transfers and take necessary action to prevent unallowable costs from posting to the grant. We also recommend the University consider implementation of an automated control to ensure F&A is charged appropriately when cost transfer entries are made. Lastly, we recommend the University determine what additional Workday automated reporting is available to monitor compliance for personnel expenses, including effort verification reporting, F&A, etc. for activities allowed or unallowed and allowable costs/cost principles.
Finding 2022 001 Federal Program Title ? Research & Development Cluster (R&D) Assistance Listing Nos. ? As listed on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Federal Agencies ? U.S. Department of Agriculture, U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Department of Defense, U.S. Department of Interior, U.S. Department of Justice, Department of State, U.S. Department of Transportation, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, National Endowment for the Humanities, National Science Foundation, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, U.S. Department of Energy, U.S. Department of Education, and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Award Numbers ? As listed on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Grant Award Periods ? Various Compliance Requirement ? Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Criteria: 2 CFR 200.430 includes the standards for documentation of personnel expenses. According to 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1), charges to federal awards for salary and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. Among other requirements within 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1), section (i) states records must be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated and section (v) states that the records must comply with established accounting policies and practices. Also, the HHS Grants Policy for educational institutions requires a plan confirmation system (system) for professorial and other professional staff members that is based on budgeted, planned, or assigned work activity and that is updated to reflect any significant changes in work distribution. The system must be incorporated into the organization?s official records and must identify activity applicable to each sponsored agreement and to each category needed to identify indirect costs and the functions to which they are allocable. At least annually, the employee, principal investigator, or responsible official will verify, by suitable means, that the work was performed and that the salaries and wages charged to sponsored agreements, whether as direct charges or in other categories of cost, are reasonable in relation to the work performed. A system, supported by after-the-fact activity reports, that reflects the distribution of covered employees? activity allocable to each grant and includes identification and recording of significant changes in work activity when initial charges were based on estimates. For professorial and other professional staff members, the activity reports will be prepared each academic term, but at least every 6 months. The University?s `Effort Reporting Policy? states ?Subjects must return the certified effort verification report no later than 30 calendar days after they have been distributed.? Additionally, as set forth in 2 CFR 200, the University is required to ensure allowable costs do not consist of improper payments, including payments that should not have been made or that were made in incorrect amounts (including overpayments and underpayments). Indirect costs are required to adhere to 2 CFR 200, Appendix III. Further, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official. Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and 45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: While performing procedures related to personnel expenses, we noted the University had not followed their `Effort Reporting Policy? which states ?Subjects must return the certified effort verification report no later than 30 calendar days after they have been distributed.? We noted two of our sixty sampled effort reports that had not been returned within the 30-calendar day policy. Total payroll and fringe totaled approximately $13,200,000 during fiscal year 2022. While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted three of forty sampled grants (totaling $3,385,750) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect object class that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class which resulted in overcharges during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 for a total overstatement of $1,888 as noted below: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Additionally, we noted indirect costs were overcharged for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $3,385,750) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect object class during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2021 that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class which resulted in overcharges. These overstatements were corrected during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 for a total of $18,377 as noted below: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2022 totaled approximately $8,360,000. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their `Cost Transfer Policy? which states ?Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis?. The University?s cost transfer policy defines timely as ?occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)?. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted thirty-two of our sixty-seven sampled cost transfers (totaling $3,153,441 positive and $2,900,348 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 581 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (21 were between 91 and 180 days past, 6 were between 181 and 270 days past, and 5 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers, we noted the following exceptions: We noted a transaction which was originally recorded to an incorrect object class that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class that did not allow F&A costs to be applied: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that exceeded the amount of the award resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Positive cost transfers were approximately $4,060,000 and negative cost transfers were $3,510,000 during fiscal year 2022. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with activities allowed/unallowed and allowable costs/cost principles. Questioned Cost: Questioned costs are not determinable. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2022, they continued reconciliation procedures related to `grant level? activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday in the previous fiscal year. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual R&D Cluster agreement as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2021 001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University take a fresh look at its processes, policies and internal controls to determine what is needed, post Workday implementation, to prevent and detect noncompliance with activities allowed and unallowed and adherence to allowable cost principles/cost principles. Additionally, we recommend the University determine and address the underlying root cause that is contributing to the volume of cost transfers and take necessary action to prevent unallowable costs from posting to the grant. We also recommend the University consider implementation of an automated control to ensure F&A is charged appropriately when cost transfer entries are made. Lastly, we recommend the University determine what additional Workday automated reporting is available to monitor compliance for personnel expenses, including effort verification reporting, F&A, etc. for activities allowed or unallowed and allowable costs/cost principles.
Finding 2022 001 Federal Program Title ? Research & Development Cluster (R&D) Assistance Listing Nos. ? As listed on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Federal Agencies ? U.S. Department of Agriculture, U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Department of Defense, U.S. Department of Interior, U.S. Department of Justice, Department of State, U.S. Department of Transportation, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, National Endowment for the Humanities, National Science Foundation, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, U.S. Department of Energy, U.S. Department of Education, and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Award Numbers ? As listed on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Grant Award Periods ? Various Compliance Requirement ? Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Criteria: 2 CFR 200.430 includes the standards for documentation of personnel expenses. According to 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1), charges to federal awards for salary and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. Among other requirements within 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1), section (i) states records must be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated and section (v) states that the records must comply with established accounting policies and practices. Also, the HHS Grants Policy for educational institutions requires a plan confirmation system (system) for professorial and other professional staff members that is based on budgeted, planned, or assigned work activity and that is updated to reflect any significant changes in work distribution. The system must be incorporated into the organization?s official records and must identify activity applicable to each sponsored agreement and to each category needed to identify indirect costs and the functions to which they are allocable. At least annually, the employee, principal investigator, or responsible official will verify, by suitable means, that the work was performed and that the salaries and wages charged to sponsored agreements, whether as direct charges or in other categories of cost, are reasonable in relation to the work performed. A system, supported by after-the-fact activity reports, that reflects the distribution of covered employees? activity allocable to each grant and includes identification and recording of significant changes in work activity when initial charges were based on estimates. For professorial and other professional staff members, the activity reports will be prepared each academic term, but at least every 6 months. The University?s `Effort Reporting Policy? states ?Subjects must return the certified effort verification report no later than 30 calendar days after they have been distributed.? Additionally, as set forth in 2 CFR 200, the University is required to ensure allowable costs do not consist of improper payments, including payments that should not have been made or that were made in incorrect amounts (including overpayments and underpayments). Indirect costs are required to adhere to 2 CFR 200, Appendix III. Further, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official. Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and 45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: While performing procedures related to personnel expenses, we noted the University had not followed their `Effort Reporting Policy? which states ?Subjects must return the certified effort verification report no later than 30 calendar days after they have been distributed.? We noted two of our sixty sampled effort reports that had not been returned within the 30-calendar day policy. Total payroll and fringe totaled approximately $13,200,000 during fiscal year 2022. While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted three of forty sampled grants (totaling $3,385,750) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect object class that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class which resulted in overcharges during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 for a total overstatement of $1,888 as noted below: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Additionally, we noted indirect costs were overcharged for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $3,385,750) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect object class during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2021 that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class which resulted in overcharges. These overstatements were corrected during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 for a total of $18,377 as noted below: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2022 totaled approximately $8,360,000. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their `Cost Transfer Policy? which states ?Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis?. The University?s cost transfer policy defines timely as ?occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)?. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted thirty-two of our sixty-seven sampled cost transfers (totaling $3,153,441 positive and $2,900,348 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 581 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (21 were between 91 and 180 days past, 6 were between 181 and 270 days past, and 5 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers, we noted the following exceptions: We noted a transaction which was originally recorded to an incorrect object class that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class that did not allow F&A costs to be applied: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that exceeded the amount of the award resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Positive cost transfers were approximately $4,060,000 and negative cost transfers were $3,510,000 during fiscal year 2022. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with activities allowed/unallowed and allowable costs/cost principles. Questioned Cost: Questioned costs are not determinable. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2022, they continued reconciliation procedures related to `grant level? activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday in the previous fiscal year. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual R&D Cluster agreement as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2021 001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University take a fresh look at its processes, policies and internal controls to determine what is needed, post Workday implementation, to prevent and detect noncompliance with activities allowed and unallowed and adherence to allowable cost principles/cost principles. Additionally, we recommend the University determine and address the underlying root cause that is contributing to the volume of cost transfers and take necessary action to prevent unallowable costs from posting to the grant. We also recommend the University consider implementation of an automated control to ensure F&A is charged appropriately when cost transfer entries are made. Lastly, we recommend the University determine what additional Workday automated reporting is available to monitor compliance for personnel expenses, including effort verification reporting, F&A, etc. for activities allowed or unallowed and allowable costs/cost principles.
Finding 2022 001 Federal Program Title ? Research & Development Cluster (R&D) Assistance Listing Nos. ? As listed on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Federal Agencies ? U.S. Department of Agriculture, U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Department of Defense, U.S. Department of Interior, U.S. Department of Justice, Department of State, U.S. Department of Transportation, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, National Endowment for the Humanities, National Science Foundation, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, U.S. Department of Energy, U.S. Department of Education, and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Award Numbers ? As listed on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Grant Award Periods ? Various Compliance Requirement ? Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Criteria: 2 CFR 200.430 includes the standards for documentation of personnel expenses. According to 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1), charges to federal awards for salary and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. Among other requirements within 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1), section (i) states records must be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated and section (v) states that the records must comply with established accounting policies and practices. Also, the HHS Grants Policy for educational institutions requires a plan confirmation system (system) for professorial and other professional staff members that is based on budgeted, planned, or assigned work activity and that is updated to reflect any significant changes in work distribution. The system must be incorporated into the organization?s official records and must identify activity applicable to each sponsored agreement and to each category needed to identify indirect costs and the functions to which they are allocable. At least annually, the employee, principal investigator, or responsible official will verify, by suitable means, that the work was performed and that the salaries and wages charged to sponsored agreements, whether as direct charges or in other categories of cost, are reasonable in relation to the work performed. A system, supported by after-the-fact activity reports, that reflects the distribution of covered employees? activity allocable to each grant and includes identification and recording of significant changes in work activity when initial charges were based on estimates. For professorial and other professional staff members, the activity reports will be prepared each academic term, but at least every 6 months. The University?s `Effort Reporting Policy? states ?Subjects must return the certified effort verification report no later than 30 calendar days after they have been distributed.? Additionally, as set forth in 2 CFR 200, the University is required to ensure allowable costs do not consist of improper payments, including payments that should not have been made or that were made in incorrect amounts (including overpayments and underpayments). Indirect costs are required to adhere to 2 CFR 200, Appendix III. Further, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official. Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and 45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: While performing procedures related to personnel expenses, we noted the University had not followed their `Effort Reporting Policy? which states ?Subjects must return the certified effort verification report no later than 30 calendar days after they have been distributed.? We noted two of our sixty sampled effort reports that had not been returned within the 30-calendar day policy. Total payroll and fringe totaled approximately $13,200,000 during fiscal year 2022. While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted three of forty sampled grants (totaling $3,385,750) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect object class that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class which resulted in overcharges during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 for a total overstatement of $1,888 as noted below: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Additionally, we noted indirect costs were overcharged for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $3,385,750) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect object class during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2021 that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class which resulted in overcharges. These overstatements were corrected during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 for a total of $18,377 as noted below: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2022 totaled approximately $8,360,000. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their `Cost Transfer Policy? which states ?Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis?. The University?s cost transfer policy defines timely as ?occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)?. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted thirty-two of our sixty-seven sampled cost transfers (totaling $3,153,441 positive and $2,900,348 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 581 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (21 were between 91 and 180 days past, 6 were between 181 and 270 days past, and 5 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers, we noted the following exceptions: We noted a transaction which was originally recorded to an incorrect object class that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class that did not allow F&A costs to be applied: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that exceeded the amount of the award resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Positive cost transfers were approximately $4,060,000 and negative cost transfers were $3,510,000 during fiscal year 2022. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with activities allowed/unallowed and allowable costs/cost principles. Questioned Cost: Questioned costs are not determinable. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2022, they continued reconciliation procedures related to `grant level? activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday in the previous fiscal year. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual R&D Cluster agreement as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2021 001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University take a fresh look at its processes, policies and internal controls to determine what is needed, post Workday implementation, to prevent and detect noncompliance with activities allowed and unallowed and adherence to allowable cost principles/cost principles. Additionally, we recommend the University determine and address the underlying root cause that is contributing to the volume of cost transfers and take necessary action to prevent unallowable costs from posting to the grant. We also recommend the University consider implementation of an automated control to ensure F&A is charged appropriately when cost transfer entries are made. Lastly, we recommend the University determine what additional Workday automated reporting is available to monitor compliance for personnel expenses, including effort verification reporting, F&A, etc. for activities allowed or unallowed and allowable costs/cost principles.
Finding 2022 001 Federal Program Title ? Research & Development Cluster (R&D) Assistance Listing Nos. ? As listed on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Federal Agencies ? U.S. Department of Agriculture, U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Department of Defense, U.S. Department of Interior, U.S. Department of Justice, Department of State, U.S. Department of Transportation, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, National Endowment for the Humanities, National Science Foundation, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, U.S. Department of Energy, U.S. Department of Education, and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Award Numbers ? As listed on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Grant Award Periods ? Various Compliance Requirement ? Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Criteria: 2 CFR 200.430 includes the standards for documentation of personnel expenses. According to 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1), charges to federal awards for salary and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. Among other requirements within 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1), section (i) states records must be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated and section (v) states that the records must comply with established accounting policies and practices. Also, the HHS Grants Policy for educational institutions requires a plan confirmation system (system) for professorial and other professional staff members that is based on budgeted, planned, or assigned work activity and that is updated to reflect any significant changes in work distribution. The system must be incorporated into the organization?s official records and must identify activity applicable to each sponsored agreement and to each category needed to identify indirect costs and the functions to which they are allocable. At least annually, the employee, principal investigator, or responsible official will verify, by suitable means, that the work was performed and that the salaries and wages charged to sponsored agreements, whether as direct charges or in other categories of cost, are reasonable in relation to the work performed. A system, supported by after-the-fact activity reports, that reflects the distribution of covered employees? activity allocable to each grant and includes identification and recording of significant changes in work activity when initial charges were based on estimates. For professorial and other professional staff members, the activity reports will be prepared each academic term, but at least every 6 months. The University?s `Effort Reporting Policy? states ?Subjects must return the certified effort verification report no later than 30 calendar days after they have been distributed.? Additionally, as set forth in 2 CFR 200, the University is required to ensure allowable costs do not consist of improper payments, including payments that should not have been made or that were made in incorrect amounts (including overpayments and underpayments). Indirect costs are required to adhere to 2 CFR 200, Appendix III. Further, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official. Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and 45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: While performing procedures related to personnel expenses, we noted the University had not followed their `Effort Reporting Policy? which states ?Subjects must return the certified effort verification report no later than 30 calendar days after they have been distributed.? We noted two of our sixty sampled effort reports that had not been returned within the 30-calendar day policy. Total payroll and fringe totaled approximately $13,200,000 during fiscal year 2022. While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted three of forty sampled grants (totaling $3,385,750) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect object class that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class which resulted in overcharges during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 for a total overstatement of $1,888 as noted below: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Additionally, we noted indirect costs were overcharged for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $3,385,750) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect object class during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2021 that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class which resulted in overcharges. These overstatements were corrected during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 for a total of $18,377 as noted below: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2022 totaled approximately $8,360,000. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their `Cost Transfer Policy? which states ?Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis?. The University?s cost transfer policy defines timely as ?occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)?. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted thirty-two of our sixty-seven sampled cost transfers (totaling $3,153,441 positive and $2,900,348 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 581 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (21 were between 91 and 180 days past, 6 were between 181 and 270 days past, and 5 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers, we noted the following exceptions: We noted a transaction which was originally recorded to an incorrect object class that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class that did not allow F&A costs to be applied: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that exceeded the amount of the award resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Positive cost transfers were approximately $4,060,000 and negative cost transfers were $3,510,000 during fiscal year 2022. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with activities allowed/unallowed and allowable costs/cost principles. Questioned Cost: Questioned costs are not determinable. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2022, they continued reconciliation procedures related to `grant level? activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday in the previous fiscal year. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual R&D Cluster agreement as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2021 001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University take a fresh look at its processes, policies and internal controls to determine what is needed, post Workday implementation, to prevent and detect noncompliance with activities allowed and unallowed and adherence to allowable cost principles/cost principles. Additionally, we recommend the University determine and address the underlying root cause that is contributing to the volume of cost transfers and take necessary action to prevent unallowable costs from posting to the grant. We also recommend the University consider implementation of an automated control to ensure F&A is charged appropriately when cost transfer entries are made. Lastly, we recommend the University determine what additional Workday automated reporting is available to monitor compliance for personnel expenses, including effort verification reporting, F&A, etc. for activities allowed or unallowed and allowable costs/cost principles.
Finding 2022 001 Federal Program Title ? Research & Development Cluster (R&D) Assistance Listing Nos. ? As listed on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Federal Agencies ? U.S. Department of Agriculture, U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Department of Defense, U.S. Department of Interior, U.S. Department of Justice, Department of State, U.S. Department of Transportation, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, National Endowment for the Humanities, National Science Foundation, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, U.S. Department of Energy, U.S. Department of Education, and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Award Numbers ? As listed on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Grant Award Periods ? Various Compliance Requirement ? Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Criteria: 2 CFR 200.430 includes the standards for documentation of personnel expenses. According to 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1), charges to federal awards for salary and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. Among other requirements within 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1), section (i) states records must be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated and section (v) states that the records must comply with established accounting policies and practices. Also, the HHS Grants Policy for educational institutions requires a plan confirmation system (system) for professorial and other professional staff members that is based on budgeted, planned, or assigned work activity and that is updated to reflect any significant changes in work distribution. The system must be incorporated into the organization?s official records and must identify activity applicable to each sponsored agreement and to each category needed to identify indirect costs and the functions to which they are allocable. At least annually, the employee, principal investigator, or responsible official will verify, by suitable means, that the work was performed and that the salaries and wages charged to sponsored agreements, whether as direct charges or in other categories of cost, are reasonable in relation to the work performed. A system, supported by after-the-fact activity reports, that reflects the distribution of covered employees? activity allocable to each grant and includes identification and recording of significant changes in work activity when initial charges were based on estimates. For professorial and other professional staff members, the activity reports will be prepared each academic term, but at least every 6 months. The University?s `Effort Reporting Policy? states ?Subjects must return the certified effort verification report no later than 30 calendar days after they have been distributed.? Additionally, as set forth in 2 CFR 200, the University is required to ensure allowable costs do not consist of improper payments, including payments that should not have been made or that were made in incorrect amounts (including overpayments and underpayments). Indirect costs are required to adhere to 2 CFR 200, Appendix III. Further, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official. Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and 45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: While performing procedures related to personnel expenses, we noted the University had not followed their `Effort Reporting Policy? which states ?Subjects must return the certified effort verification report no later than 30 calendar days after they have been distributed.? We noted two of our sixty sampled effort reports that had not been returned within the 30-calendar day policy. Total payroll and fringe totaled approximately $13,200,000 during fiscal year 2022. While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted three of forty sampled grants (totaling $3,385,750) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect object class that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class which resulted in overcharges during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 for a total overstatement of $1,888 as noted below: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Additionally, we noted indirect costs were overcharged for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $3,385,750) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect object class during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2021 that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class which resulted in overcharges. These overstatements were corrected during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 for a total of $18,377 as noted below: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2022 totaled approximately $8,360,000. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their `Cost Transfer Policy? which states ?Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis?. The University?s cost transfer policy defines timely as ?occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)?. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted thirty-two of our sixty-seven sampled cost transfers (totaling $3,153,441 positive and $2,900,348 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 581 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (21 were between 91 and 180 days past, 6 were between 181 and 270 days past, and 5 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers, we noted the following exceptions: We noted a transaction which was originally recorded to an incorrect object class that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class that did not allow F&A costs to be applied: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that exceeded the amount of the award resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Positive cost transfers were approximately $4,060,000 and negative cost transfers were $3,510,000 during fiscal year 2022. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with activities allowed/unallowed and allowable costs/cost principles. Questioned Cost: Questioned costs are not determinable. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2022, they continued reconciliation procedures related to `grant level? activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday in the previous fiscal year. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual R&D Cluster agreement as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2021 001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University take a fresh look at its processes, policies and internal controls to determine what is needed, post Workday implementation, to prevent and detect noncompliance with activities allowed and unallowed and adherence to allowable cost principles/cost principles. Additionally, we recommend the University determine and address the underlying root cause that is contributing to the volume of cost transfers and take necessary action to prevent unallowable costs from posting to the grant. We also recommend the University consider implementation of an automated control to ensure F&A is charged appropriately when cost transfer entries are made. Lastly, we recommend the University determine what additional Workday automated reporting is available to monitor compliance for personnel expenses, including effort verification reporting, F&A, etc. for activities allowed or unallowed and allowable costs/cost principles.
Finding 2022 001 Federal Program Title ? Research & Development Cluster (R&D) Assistance Listing Nos. ? As listed on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Federal Agencies ? U.S. Department of Agriculture, U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Department of Defense, U.S. Department of Interior, U.S. Department of Justice, Department of State, U.S. Department of Transportation, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, National Endowment for the Humanities, National Science Foundation, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, U.S. Department of Energy, U.S. Department of Education, and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Award Numbers ? As listed on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Grant Award Periods ? Various Compliance Requirement ? Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Criteria: 2 CFR 200.430 includes the standards for documentation of personnel expenses. According to 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1), charges to federal awards for salary and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. Among other requirements within 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1), section (i) states records must be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated and section (v) states that the records must comply with established accounting policies and practices. Also, the HHS Grants Policy for educational institutions requires a plan confirmation system (system) for professorial and other professional staff members that is based on budgeted, planned, or assigned work activity and that is updated to reflect any significant changes in work distribution. The system must be incorporated into the organization?s official records and must identify activity applicable to each sponsored agreement and to each category needed to identify indirect costs and the functions to which they are allocable. At least annually, the employee, principal investigator, or responsible official will verify, by suitable means, that the work was performed and that the salaries and wages charged to sponsored agreements, whether as direct charges or in other categories of cost, are reasonable in relation to the work performed. A system, supported by after-the-fact activity reports, that reflects the distribution of covered employees? activity allocable to each grant and includes identification and recording of significant changes in work activity when initial charges were based on estimates. For professorial and other professional staff members, the activity reports will be prepared each academic term, but at least every 6 months. The University?s `Effort Reporting Policy? states ?Subjects must return the certified effort verification report no later than 30 calendar days after they have been distributed.? Additionally, as set forth in 2 CFR 200, the University is required to ensure allowable costs do not consist of improper payments, including payments that should not have been made or that were made in incorrect amounts (including overpayments and underpayments). Indirect costs are required to adhere to 2 CFR 200, Appendix III. Further, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official. Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and 45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: While performing procedures related to personnel expenses, we noted the University had not followed their `Effort Reporting Policy? which states ?Subjects must return the certified effort verification report no later than 30 calendar days after they have been distributed.? We noted two of our sixty sampled effort reports that had not been returned within the 30-calendar day policy. Total payroll and fringe totaled approximately $13,200,000 during fiscal year 2022. While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted three of forty sampled grants (totaling $3,385,750) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect object class that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class which resulted in overcharges during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 for a total overstatement of $1,888 as noted below: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Additionally, we noted indirect costs were overcharged for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $3,385,750) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect object class during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2021 that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class which resulted in overcharges. These overstatements were corrected during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 for a total of $18,377 as noted below: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2022 totaled approximately $8,360,000. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their `Cost Transfer Policy? which states ?Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis?. The University?s cost transfer policy defines timely as ?occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)?. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted thirty-two of our sixty-seven sampled cost transfers (totaling $3,153,441 positive and $2,900,348 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 581 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (21 were between 91 and 180 days past, 6 were between 181 and 270 days past, and 5 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers, we noted the following exceptions: We noted a transaction which was originally recorded to an incorrect object class that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class that did not allow F&A costs to be applied: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that exceeded the amount of the award resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Positive cost transfers were approximately $4,060,000 and negative cost transfers were $3,510,000 during fiscal year 2022. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with activities allowed/unallowed and allowable costs/cost principles. Questioned Cost: Questioned costs are not determinable. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2022, they continued reconciliation procedures related to `grant level? activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday in the previous fiscal year. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual R&D Cluster agreement as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2021 001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University take a fresh look at its processes, policies and internal controls to determine what is needed, post Workday implementation, to prevent and detect noncompliance with activities allowed and unallowed and adherence to allowable cost principles/cost principles. Additionally, we recommend the University determine and address the underlying root cause that is contributing to the volume of cost transfers and take necessary action to prevent unallowable costs from posting to the grant. We also recommend the University consider implementation of an automated control to ensure F&A is charged appropriately when cost transfer entries are made. Lastly, we recommend the University determine what additional Workday automated reporting is available to monitor compliance for personnel expenses, including effort verification reporting, F&A, etc. for activities allowed or unallowed and allowable costs/cost principles.
Finding 2022 001 Federal Program Title ? Research & Development Cluster (R&D) Assistance Listing Nos. ? As listed on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Federal Agencies ? U.S. Department of Agriculture, U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Department of Defense, U.S. Department of Interior, U.S. Department of Justice, Department of State, U.S. Department of Transportation, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, National Endowment for the Humanities, National Science Foundation, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, U.S. Department of Energy, U.S. Department of Education, and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Award Numbers ? As listed on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Grant Award Periods ? Various Compliance Requirement ? Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Criteria: 2 CFR 200.430 includes the standards for documentation of personnel expenses. According to 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1), charges to federal awards for salary and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. Among other requirements within 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1), section (i) states records must be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated and section (v) states that the records must comply with established accounting policies and practices. Also, the HHS Grants Policy for educational institutions requires a plan confirmation system (system) for professorial and other professional staff members that is based on budgeted, planned, or assigned work activity and that is updated to reflect any significant changes in work distribution. The system must be incorporated into the organization?s official records and must identify activity applicable to each sponsored agreement and to each category needed to identify indirect costs and the functions to which they are allocable. At least annually, the employee, principal investigator, or responsible official will verify, by suitable means, that the work was performed and that the salaries and wages charged to sponsored agreements, whether as direct charges or in other categories of cost, are reasonable in relation to the work performed. A system, supported by after-the-fact activity reports, that reflects the distribution of covered employees? activity allocable to each grant and includes identification and recording of significant changes in work activity when initial charges were based on estimates. For professorial and other professional staff members, the activity reports will be prepared each academic term, but at least every 6 months. The University?s `Effort Reporting Policy? states ?Subjects must return the certified effort verification report no later than 30 calendar days after they have been distributed.? Additionally, as set forth in 2 CFR 200, the University is required to ensure allowable costs do not consist of improper payments, including payments that should not have been made or that were made in incorrect amounts (including overpayments and underpayments). Indirect costs are required to adhere to 2 CFR 200, Appendix III. Further, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official. Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and 45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: While performing procedures related to personnel expenses, we noted the University had not followed their `Effort Reporting Policy? which states ?Subjects must return the certified effort verification report no later than 30 calendar days after they have been distributed.? We noted two of our sixty sampled effort reports that had not been returned within the 30-calendar day policy. Total payroll and fringe totaled approximately $13,200,000 during fiscal year 2022. While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted three of forty sampled grants (totaling $3,385,750) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect object class that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class which resulted in overcharges during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 for a total overstatement of $1,888 as noted below: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Additionally, we noted indirect costs were overcharged for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $3,385,750) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect object class during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2021 that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class which resulted in overcharges. These overstatements were corrected during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 for a total of $18,377 as noted below: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2022 totaled approximately $8,360,000. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their `Cost Transfer Policy? which states ?Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis?. The University?s cost transfer policy defines timely as ?occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)?. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted thirty-two of our sixty-seven sampled cost transfers (totaling $3,153,441 positive and $2,900,348 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 581 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (21 were between 91 and 180 days past, 6 were between 181 and 270 days past, and 5 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers, we noted the following exceptions: We noted a transaction which was originally recorded to an incorrect object class that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class that did not allow F&A costs to be applied: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that exceeded the amount of the award resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Positive cost transfers were approximately $4,060,000 and negative cost transfers were $3,510,000 during fiscal year 2022. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with activities allowed/unallowed and allowable costs/cost principles. Questioned Cost: Questioned costs are not determinable. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2022, they continued reconciliation procedures related to `grant level? activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday in the previous fiscal year. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual R&D Cluster agreement as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2021 001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University take a fresh look at its processes, policies and internal controls to determine what is needed, post Workday implementation, to prevent and detect noncompliance with activities allowed and unallowed and adherence to allowable cost principles/cost principles. Additionally, we recommend the University determine and address the underlying root cause that is contributing to the volume of cost transfers and take necessary action to prevent unallowable costs from posting to the grant. We also recommend the University consider implementation of an automated control to ensure F&A is charged appropriately when cost transfer entries are made. Lastly, we recommend the University determine what additional Workday automated reporting is available to monitor compliance for personnel expenses, including effort verification reporting, F&A, etc. for activities allowed or unallowed and allowable costs/cost principles.
Finding 2022 001 Federal Program Title ? Research & Development Cluster (R&D) Assistance Listing Nos. ? As listed on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Federal Agencies ? U.S. Department of Agriculture, U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Department of Defense, U.S. Department of Interior, U.S. Department of Justice, Department of State, U.S. Department of Transportation, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, National Endowment for the Humanities, National Science Foundation, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, U.S. Department of Energy, U.S. Department of Education, and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Award Numbers ? As listed on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Grant Award Periods ? Various Compliance Requirement ? Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Criteria: 2 CFR 200.430 includes the standards for documentation of personnel expenses. According to 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1), charges to federal awards for salary and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. Among other requirements within 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1), section (i) states records must be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated and section (v) states that the records must comply with established accounting policies and practices. Also, the HHS Grants Policy for educational institutions requires a plan confirmation system (system) for professorial and other professional staff members that is based on budgeted, planned, or assigned work activity and that is updated to reflect any significant changes in work distribution. The system must be incorporated into the organization?s official records and must identify activity applicable to each sponsored agreement and to each category needed to identify indirect costs and the functions to which they are allocable. At least annually, the employee, principal investigator, or responsible official will verify, by suitable means, that the work was performed and that the salaries and wages charged to sponsored agreements, whether as direct charges or in other categories of cost, are reasonable in relation to the work performed. A system, supported by after-the-fact activity reports, that reflects the distribution of covered employees? activity allocable to each grant and includes identification and recording of significant changes in work activity when initial charges were based on estimates. For professorial and other professional staff members, the activity reports will be prepared each academic term, but at least every 6 months. The University?s `Effort Reporting Policy? states ?Subjects must return the certified effort verification report no later than 30 calendar days after they have been distributed.? Additionally, as set forth in 2 CFR 200, the University is required to ensure allowable costs do not consist of improper payments, including payments that should not have been made or that were made in incorrect amounts (including overpayments and underpayments). Indirect costs are required to adhere to 2 CFR 200, Appendix III. Further, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official. Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and 45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: While performing procedures related to personnel expenses, we noted the University had not followed their `Effort Reporting Policy? which states ?Subjects must return the certified effort verification report no later than 30 calendar days after they have been distributed.? We noted two of our sixty sampled effort reports that had not been returned within the 30-calendar day policy. Total payroll and fringe totaled approximately $13,200,000 during fiscal year 2022. While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted three of forty sampled grants (totaling $3,385,750) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect object class that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class which resulted in overcharges during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 for a total overstatement of $1,888 as noted below: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Additionally, we noted indirect costs were overcharged for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $3,385,750) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect object class during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2021 that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class which resulted in overcharges. These overstatements were corrected during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 for a total of $18,377 as noted below: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2022 totaled approximately $8,360,000. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their `Cost Transfer Policy? which states ?Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis?. The University?s cost transfer policy defines timely as ?occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)?. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted thirty-two of our sixty-seven sampled cost transfers (totaling $3,153,441 positive and $2,900,348 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 581 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (21 were between 91 and 180 days past, 6 were between 181 and 270 days past, and 5 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers, we noted the following exceptions: We noted a transaction which was originally recorded to an incorrect object class that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class that did not allow F&A costs to be applied: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that exceeded the amount of the award resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Positive cost transfers were approximately $4,060,000 and negative cost transfers were $3,510,000 during fiscal year 2022. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with activities allowed/unallowed and allowable costs/cost principles. Questioned Cost: Questioned costs are not determinable. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2022, they continued reconciliation procedures related to `grant level? activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday in the previous fiscal year. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual R&D Cluster agreement as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2021 001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University take a fresh look at its processes, policies and internal controls to determine what is needed, post Workday implementation, to prevent and detect noncompliance with activities allowed and unallowed and adherence to allowable cost principles/cost principles. Additionally, we recommend the University determine and address the underlying root cause that is contributing to the volume of cost transfers and take necessary action to prevent unallowable costs from posting to the grant. We also recommend the University consider implementation of an automated control to ensure F&A is charged appropriately when cost transfer entries are made. Lastly, we recommend the University determine what additional Workday automated reporting is available to monitor compliance for personnel expenses, including effort verification reporting, F&A, etc. for activities allowed or unallowed and allowable costs/cost principles.
Finding 2022 001 Federal Program Title ? Research & Development Cluster (R&D) Assistance Listing Nos. ? As listed on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Federal Agencies ? U.S. Department of Agriculture, U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Department of Defense, U.S. Department of Interior, U.S. Department of Justice, Department of State, U.S. Department of Transportation, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, National Endowment for the Humanities, National Science Foundation, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, U.S. Department of Energy, U.S. Department of Education, and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Award Numbers ? As listed on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Grant Award Periods ? Various Compliance Requirement ? Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Criteria: 2 CFR 200.430 includes the standards for documentation of personnel expenses. According to 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1), charges to federal awards for salary and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. Among other requirements within 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1), section (i) states records must be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated and section (v) states that the records must comply with established accounting policies and practices. Also, the HHS Grants Policy for educational institutions requires a plan confirmation system (system) for professorial and other professional staff members that is based on budgeted, planned, or assigned work activity and that is updated to reflect any significant changes in work distribution. The system must be incorporated into the organization?s official records and must identify activity applicable to each sponsored agreement and to each category needed to identify indirect costs and the functions to which they are allocable. At least annually, the employee, principal investigator, or responsible official will verify, by suitable means, that the work was performed and that the salaries and wages charged to sponsored agreements, whether as direct charges or in other categories of cost, are reasonable in relation to the work performed. A system, supported by after-the-fact activity reports, that reflects the distribution of covered employees? activity allocable to each grant and includes identification and recording of significant changes in work activity when initial charges were based on estimates. For professorial and other professional staff members, the activity reports will be prepared each academic term, but at least every 6 months. The University?s `Effort Reporting Policy? states ?Subjects must return the certified effort verification report no later than 30 calendar days after they have been distributed.? Additionally, as set forth in 2 CFR 200, the University is required to ensure allowable costs do not consist of improper payments, including payments that should not have been made or that were made in incorrect amounts (including overpayments and underpayments). Indirect costs are required to adhere to 2 CFR 200, Appendix III. Further, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official. Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and 45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: While performing procedures related to personnel expenses, we noted the University had not followed their `Effort Reporting Policy? which states ?Subjects must return the certified effort verification report no later than 30 calendar days after they have been distributed.? We noted two of our sixty sampled effort reports that had not been returned within the 30-calendar day policy. Total payroll and fringe totaled approximately $13,200,000 during fiscal year 2022. While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted three of forty sampled grants (totaling $3,385,750) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect object class that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class which resulted in overcharges during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 for a total overstatement of $1,888 as noted below: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Additionally, we noted indirect costs were overcharged for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $3,385,750) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect object class during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2021 that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class which resulted in overcharges. These overstatements were corrected during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 for a total of $18,377 as noted below: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2022 totaled approximately $8,360,000. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their `Cost Transfer Policy? which states ?Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis?. The University?s cost transfer policy defines timely as ?occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)?. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted thirty-two of our sixty-seven sampled cost transfers (totaling $3,153,441 positive and $2,900,348 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 581 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (21 were between 91 and 180 days past, 6 were between 181 and 270 days past, and 5 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers, we noted the following exceptions: We noted a transaction which was originally recorded to an incorrect object class that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class that did not allow F&A costs to be applied: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that exceeded the amount of the award resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Positive cost transfers were approximately $4,060,000 and negative cost transfers were $3,510,000 during fiscal year 2022. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with activities allowed/unallowed and allowable costs/cost principles. Questioned Cost: Questioned costs are not determinable. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2022, they continued reconciliation procedures related to `grant level? activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday in the previous fiscal year. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual R&D Cluster agreement as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2021 001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University take a fresh look at its processes, policies and internal controls to determine what is needed, post Workday implementation, to prevent and detect noncompliance with activities allowed and unallowed and adherence to allowable cost principles/cost principles. Additionally, we recommend the University determine and address the underlying root cause that is contributing to the volume of cost transfers and take necessary action to prevent unallowable costs from posting to the grant. We also recommend the University consider implementation of an automated control to ensure F&A is charged appropriately when cost transfer entries are made. Lastly, we recommend the University determine what additional Workday automated reporting is available to monitor compliance for personnel expenses, including effort verification reporting, F&A, etc. for activities allowed or unallowed and allowable costs/cost principles.
Finding 2022 001 Federal Program Title ? Research & Development Cluster (R&D) Assistance Listing Nos. ? As listed on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Federal Agencies ? U.S. Department of Agriculture, U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Department of Defense, U.S. Department of Interior, U.S. Department of Justice, Department of State, U.S. Department of Transportation, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, National Endowment for the Humanities, National Science Foundation, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, U.S. Department of Energy, U.S. Department of Education, and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Award Numbers ? As listed on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Grant Award Periods ? Various Compliance Requirement ? Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Criteria: 2 CFR 200.430 includes the standards for documentation of personnel expenses. According to 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1), charges to federal awards for salary and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. Among other requirements within 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1), section (i) states records must be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated and section (v) states that the records must comply with established accounting policies and practices. Also, the HHS Grants Policy for educational institutions requires a plan confirmation system (system) for professorial and other professional staff members that is based on budgeted, planned, or assigned work activity and that is updated to reflect any significant changes in work distribution. The system must be incorporated into the organization?s official records and must identify activity applicable to each sponsored agreement and to each category needed to identify indirect costs and the functions to which they are allocable. At least annually, the employee, principal investigator, or responsible official will verify, by suitable means, that the work was performed and that the salaries and wages charged to sponsored agreements, whether as direct charges or in other categories of cost, are reasonable in relation to the work performed. A system, supported by after-the-fact activity reports, that reflects the distribution of covered employees? activity allocable to each grant and includes identification and recording of significant changes in work activity when initial charges were based on estimates. For professorial and other professional staff members, the activity reports will be prepared each academic term, but at least every 6 months. The University?s `Effort Reporting Policy? states ?Subjects must return the certified effort verification report no later than 30 calendar days after they have been distributed.? Additionally, as set forth in 2 CFR 200, the University is required to ensure allowable costs do not consist of improper payments, including payments that should not have been made or that were made in incorrect amounts (including overpayments and underpayments). Indirect costs are required to adhere to 2 CFR 200, Appendix III. Further, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official. Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and 45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: While performing procedures related to personnel expenses, we noted the University had not followed their `Effort Reporting Policy? which states ?Subjects must return the certified effort verification report no later than 30 calendar days after they have been distributed.? We noted two of our sixty sampled effort reports that had not been returned within the 30-calendar day policy. Total payroll and fringe totaled approximately $13,200,000 during fiscal year 2022. While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted three of forty sampled grants (totaling $3,385,750) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect object class that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class which resulted in overcharges during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 for a total overstatement of $1,888 as noted below: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Additionally, we noted indirect costs were overcharged for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $3,385,750) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect object class during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2021 that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class which resulted in overcharges. These overstatements were corrected during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 for a total of $18,377 as noted below: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2022 totaled approximately $8,360,000. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their `Cost Transfer Policy? which states ?Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis?. The University?s cost transfer policy defines timely as ?occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)?. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted thirty-two of our sixty-seven sampled cost transfers (totaling $3,153,441 positive and $2,900,348 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 581 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (21 were between 91 and 180 days past, 6 were between 181 and 270 days past, and 5 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers, we noted the following exceptions: We noted a transaction which was originally recorded to an incorrect object class that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class that did not allow F&A costs to be applied: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that exceeded the amount of the award resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Positive cost transfers were approximately $4,060,000 and negative cost transfers were $3,510,000 during fiscal year 2022. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with activities allowed/unallowed and allowable costs/cost principles. Questioned Cost: Questioned costs are not determinable. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2022, they continued reconciliation procedures related to `grant level? activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday in the previous fiscal year. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual R&D Cluster agreement as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2021 001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University take a fresh look at its processes, policies and internal controls to determine what is needed, post Workday implementation, to prevent and detect noncompliance with activities allowed and unallowed and adherence to allowable cost principles/cost principles. Additionally, we recommend the University determine and address the underlying root cause that is contributing to the volume of cost transfers and take necessary action to prevent unallowable costs from posting to the grant. We also recommend the University consider implementation of an automated control to ensure F&A is charged appropriately when cost transfer entries are made. Lastly, we recommend the University determine what additional Workday automated reporting is available to monitor compliance for personnel expenses, including effort verification reporting, F&A, etc. for activities allowed or unallowed and allowable costs/cost principles.
Finding 2022 001 Federal Program Title ? Research & Development Cluster (R&D) Assistance Listing Nos. ? As listed on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Federal Agencies ? U.S. Department of Agriculture, U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Department of Defense, U.S. Department of Interior, U.S. Department of Justice, Department of State, U.S. Department of Transportation, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, National Endowment for the Humanities, National Science Foundation, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, U.S. Department of Energy, U.S. Department of Education, and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Award Numbers ? As listed on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Grant Award Periods ? Various Compliance Requirement ? Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Criteria: 2 CFR 200.430 includes the standards for documentation of personnel expenses. According to 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1), charges to federal awards for salary and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. Among other requirements within 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1), section (i) states records must be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated and section (v) states that the records must comply with established accounting policies and practices. Also, the HHS Grants Policy for educational institutions requires a plan confirmation system (system) for professorial and other professional staff members that is based on budgeted, planned, or assigned work activity and that is updated to reflect any significant changes in work distribution. The system must be incorporated into the organization?s official records and must identify activity applicable to each sponsored agreement and to each category needed to identify indirect costs and the functions to which they are allocable. At least annually, the employee, principal investigator, or responsible official will verify, by suitable means, that the work was performed and that the salaries and wages charged to sponsored agreements, whether as direct charges or in other categories of cost, are reasonable in relation to the work performed. A system, supported by after-the-fact activity reports, that reflects the distribution of covered employees? activity allocable to each grant and includes identification and recording of significant changes in work activity when initial charges were based on estimates. For professorial and other professional staff members, the activity reports will be prepared each academic term, but at least every 6 months. The University?s `Effort Reporting Policy? states ?Subjects must return the certified effort verification report no later than 30 calendar days after they have been distributed.? Additionally, as set forth in 2 CFR 200, the University is required to ensure allowable costs do not consist of improper payments, including payments that should not have been made or that were made in incorrect amounts (including overpayments and underpayments). Indirect costs are required to adhere to 2 CFR 200, Appendix III. Further, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official. Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and 45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: While performing procedures related to personnel expenses, we noted the University had not followed their `Effort Reporting Policy? which states ?Subjects must return the certified effort verification report no later than 30 calendar days after they have been distributed.? We noted two of our sixty sampled effort reports that had not been returned within the 30-calendar day policy. Total payroll and fringe totaled approximately $13,200,000 during fiscal year 2022. While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted three of forty sampled grants (totaling $3,385,750) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect object class that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class which resulted in overcharges during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 for a total overstatement of $1,888 as noted below: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Additionally, we noted indirect costs were overcharged for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $3,385,750) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect object class during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2021 that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class which resulted in overcharges. These overstatements were corrected during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 for a total of $18,377 as noted below: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2022 totaled approximately $8,360,000. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their `Cost Transfer Policy? which states ?Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis?. The University?s cost transfer policy defines timely as ?occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)?. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted thirty-two of our sixty-seven sampled cost transfers (totaling $3,153,441 positive and $2,900,348 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 581 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (21 were between 91 and 180 days past, 6 were between 181 and 270 days past, and 5 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers, we noted the following exceptions: We noted a transaction which was originally recorded to an incorrect object class that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class that did not allow F&A costs to be applied: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that exceeded the amount of the award resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Positive cost transfers were approximately $4,060,000 and negative cost transfers were $3,510,000 during fiscal year 2022. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with activities allowed/unallowed and allowable costs/cost principles. Questioned Cost: Questioned costs are not determinable. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2022, they continued reconciliation procedures related to `grant level? activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday in the previous fiscal year. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual R&D Cluster agreement as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2021 001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University take a fresh look at its processes, policies and internal controls to determine what is needed, post Workday implementation, to prevent and detect noncompliance with activities allowed and unallowed and adherence to allowable cost principles/cost principles. Additionally, we recommend the University determine and address the underlying root cause that is contributing to the volume of cost transfers and take necessary action to prevent unallowable costs from posting to the grant. We also recommend the University consider implementation of an automated control to ensure F&A is charged appropriately when cost transfer entries are made. Lastly, we recommend the University determine what additional Workday automated reporting is available to monitor compliance for personnel expenses, including effort verification reporting, F&A, etc. for activities allowed or unallowed and allowable costs/cost principles.
Finding 2022 001 Federal Program Title ? Research & Development Cluster (R&D) Assistance Listing Nos. ? As listed on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Federal Agencies ? U.S. Department of Agriculture, U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Department of Defense, U.S. Department of Interior, U.S. Department of Justice, Department of State, U.S. Department of Transportation, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, National Endowment for the Humanities, National Science Foundation, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, U.S. Department of Energy, U.S. Department of Education, and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Award Numbers ? As listed on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Grant Award Periods ? Various Compliance Requirement ? Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Criteria: 2 CFR 200.430 includes the standards for documentation of personnel expenses. According to 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1), charges to federal awards for salary and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. Among other requirements within 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1), section (i) states records must be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated and section (v) states that the records must comply with established accounting policies and practices. Also, the HHS Grants Policy for educational institutions requires a plan confirmation system (system) for professorial and other professional staff members that is based on budgeted, planned, or assigned work activity and that is updated to reflect any significant changes in work distribution. The system must be incorporated into the organization?s official records and must identify activity applicable to each sponsored agreement and to each category needed to identify indirect costs and the functions to which they are allocable. At least annually, the employee, principal investigator, or responsible official will verify, by suitable means, that the work was performed and that the salaries and wages charged to sponsored agreements, whether as direct charges or in other categories of cost, are reasonable in relation to the work performed. A system, supported by after-the-fact activity reports, that reflects the distribution of covered employees? activity allocable to each grant and includes identification and recording of significant changes in work activity when initial charges were based on estimates. For professorial and other professional staff members, the activity reports will be prepared each academic term, but at least every 6 months. The University?s `Effort Reporting Policy? states ?Subjects must return the certified effort verification report no later than 30 calendar days after they have been distributed.? Additionally, as set forth in 2 CFR 200, the University is required to ensure allowable costs do not consist of improper payments, including payments that should not have been made or that were made in incorrect amounts (including overpayments and underpayments). Indirect costs are required to adhere to 2 CFR 200, Appendix III. Further, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official. Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and 45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: While performing procedures related to personnel expenses, we noted the University had not followed their `Effort Reporting Policy? which states ?Subjects must return the certified effort verification report no later than 30 calendar days after they have been distributed.? We noted two of our sixty sampled effort reports that had not been returned within the 30-calendar day policy. Total payroll and fringe totaled approximately $13,200,000 during fiscal year 2022. While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted three of forty sampled grants (totaling $3,385,750) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect object class that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class which resulted in overcharges during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 for a total overstatement of $1,888 as noted below: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Additionally, we noted indirect costs were overcharged for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $3,385,750) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect object class during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2021 that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class which resulted in overcharges. These overstatements were corrected during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 for a total of $18,377 as noted below: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2022 totaled approximately $8,360,000. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their `Cost Transfer Policy? which states ?Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis?. The University?s cost transfer policy defines timely as ?occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)?. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted thirty-two of our sixty-seven sampled cost transfers (totaling $3,153,441 positive and $2,900,348 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 581 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (21 were between 91 and 180 days past, 6 were between 181 and 270 days past, and 5 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers, we noted the following exceptions: We noted a transaction which was originally recorded to an incorrect object class that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class that did not allow F&A costs to be applied: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that exceeded the amount of the award resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Positive cost transfers were approximately $4,060,000 and negative cost transfers were $3,510,000 during fiscal year 2022. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with activities allowed/unallowed and allowable costs/cost principles. Questioned Cost: Questioned costs are not determinable. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2022, they continued reconciliation procedures related to `grant level? activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday in the previous fiscal year. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual R&D Cluster agreement as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2021 001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University take a fresh look at its processes, policies and internal controls to determine what is needed, post Workday implementation, to prevent and detect noncompliance with activities allowed and unallowed and adherence to allowable cost principles/cost principles. Additionally, we recommend the University determine and address the underlying root cause that is contributing to the volume of cost transfers and take necessary action to prevent unallowable costs from posting to the grant. We also recommend the University consider implementation of an automated control to ensure F&A is charged appropriately when cost transfer entries are made. Lastly, we recommend the University determine what additional Workday automated reporting is available to monitor compliance for personnel expenses, including effort verification reporting, F&A, etc. for activities allowed or unallowed and allowable costs/cost principles.
Finding 2022 001 Federal Program Title ? Research & Development Cluster (R&D) Assistance Listing Nos. ? As listed on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Federal Agencies ? U.S. Department of Agriculture, U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Department of Defense, U.S. Department of Interior, U.S. Department of Justice, Department of State, U.S. Department of Transportation, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, National Endowment for the Humanities, National Science Foundation, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, U.S. Department of Energy, U.S. Department of Education, and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Award Numbers ? As listed on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Grant Award Periods ? Various Compliance Requirement ? Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Criteria: 2 CFR 200.430 includes the standards for documentation of personnel expenses. According to 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1), charges to federal awards for salary and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. Among other requirements within 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1), section (i) states records must be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated and section (v) states that the records must comply with established accounting policies and practices. Also, the HHS Grants Policy for educational institutions requires a plan confirmation system (system) for professorial and other professional staff members that is based on budgeted, planned, or assigned work activity and that is updated to reflect any significant changes in work distribution. The system must be incorporated into the organization?s official records and must identify activity applicable to each sponsored agreement and to each category needed to identify indirect costs and the functions to which they are allocable. At least annually, the employee, principal investigator, or responsible official will verify, by suitable means, that the work was performed and that the salaries and wages charged to sponsored agreements, whether as direct charges or in other categories of cost, are reasonable in relation to the work performed. A system, supported by after-the-fact activity reports, that reflects the distribution of covered employees? activity allocable to each grant and includes identification and recording of significant changes in work activity when initial charges were based on estimates. For professorial and other professional staff members, the activity reports will be prepared each academic term, but at least every 6 months. The University?s `Effort Reporting Policy? states ?Subjects must return the certified effort verification report no later than 30 calendar days after they have been distributed.? Additionally, as set forth in 2 CFR 200, the University is required to ensure allowable costs do not consist of improper payments, including payments that should not have been made or that were made in incorrect amounts (including overpayments and underpayments). Indirect costs are required to adhere to 2 CFR 200, Appendix III. Further, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official. Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and 45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: While performing procedures related to personnel expenses, we noted the University had not followed their `Effort Reporting Policy? which states ?Subjects must return the certified effort verification report no later than 30 calendar days after they have been distributed.? We noted two of our sixty sampled effort reports that had not been returned within the 30-calendar day policy. Total payroll and fringe totaled approximately $13,200,000 during fiscal year 2022. While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted three of forty sampled grants (totaling $3,385,750) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect object class that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class which resulted in overcharges during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 for a total overstatement of $1,888 as noted below: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Additionally, we noted indirect costs were overcharged for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $3,385,750) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect object class during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2021 that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class which resulted in overcharges. These overstatements were corrected during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 for a total of $18,377 as noted below: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2022 totaled approximately $8,360,000. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their `Cost Transfer Policy? which states ?Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis?. The University?s cost transfer policy defines timely as ?occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)?. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted thirty-two of our sixty-seven sampled cost transfers (totaling $3,153,441 positive and $2,900,348 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 581 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (21 were between 91 and 180 days past, 6 were between 181 and 270 days past, and 5 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers, we noted the following exceptions: We noted a transaction which was originally recorded to an incorrect object class that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class that did not allow F&A costs to be applied: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that exceeded the amount of the award resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Positive cost transfers were approximately $4,060,000 and negative cost transfers were $3,510,000 during fiscal year 2022. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with activities allowed/unallowed and allowable costs/cost principles. Questioned Cost: Questioned costs are not determinable. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2022, they continued reconciliation procedures related to `grant level? activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday in the previous fiscal year. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual R&D Cluster agreement as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2021 001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University take a fresh look at its processes, policies and internal controls to determine what is needed, post Workday implementation, to prevent and detect noncompliance with activities allowed and unallowed and adherence to allowable cost principles/cost principles. Additionally, we recommend the University determine and address the underlying root cause that is contributing to the volume of cost transfers and take necessary action to prevent unallowable costs from posting to the grant. We also recommend the University consider implementation of an automated control to ensure F&A is charged appropriately when cost transfer entries are made. Lastly, we recommend the University determine what additional Workday automated reporting is available to monitor compliance for personnel expenses, including effort verification reporting, F&A, etc. for activities allowed or unallowed and allowable costs/cost principles.
Finding 2022 001 Federal Program Title ? Research & Development Cluster (R&D) Assistance Listing Nos. ? As listed on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Federal Agencies ? U.S. Department of Agriculture, U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Department of Defense, U.S. Department of Interior, U.S. Department of Justice, Department of State, U.S. Department of Transportation, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, National Endowment for the Humanities, National Science Foundation, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, U.S. Department of Energy, U.S. Department of Education, and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Award Numbers ? As listed on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Grant Award Periods ? Various Compliance Requirement ? Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Criteria: 2 CFR 200.430 includes the standards for documentation of personnel expenses. According to 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1), charges to federal awards for salary and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. Among other requirements within 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1), section (i) states records must be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated and section (v) states that the records must comply with established accounting policies and practices. Also, the HHS Grants Policy for educational institutions requires a plan confirmation system (system) for professorial and other professional staff members that is based on budgeted, planned, or assigned work activity and that is updated to reflect any significant changes in work distribution. The system must be incorporated into the organization?s official records and must identify activity applicable to each sponsored agreement and to each category needed to identify indirect costs and the functions to which they are allocable. At least annually, the employee, principal investigator, or responsible official will verify, by suitable means, that the work was performed and that the salaries and wages charged to sponsored agreements, whether as direct charges or in other categories of cost, are reasonable in relation to the work performed. A system, supported by after-the-fact activity reports, that reflects the distribution of covered employees? activity allocable to each grant and includes identification and recording of significant changes in work activity when initial charges were based on estimates. For professorial and other professional staff members, the activity reports will be prepared each academic term, but at least every 6 months. The University?s `Effort Reporting Policy? states ?Subjects must return the certified effort verification report no later than 30 calendar days after they have been distributed.? Additionally, as set forth in 2 CFR 200, the University is required to ensure allowable costs do not consist of improper payments, including payments that should not have been made or that were made in incorrect amounts (including overpayments and underpayments). Indirect costs are required to adhere to 2 CFR 200, Appendix III. Further, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official. Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and 45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: While performing procedures related to personnel expenses, we noted the University had not followed their `Effort Reporting Policy? which states ?Subjects must return the certified effort verification report no later than 30 calendar days after they have been distributed.? We noted two of our sixty sampled effort reports that had not been returned within the 30-calendar day policy. Total payroll and fringe totaled approximately $13,200,000 during fiscal year 2022. While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted three of forty sampled grants (totaling $3,385,750) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect object class that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class which resulted in overcharges during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 for a total overstatement of $1,888 as noted below: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Additionally, we noted indirect costs were overcharged for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $3,385,750) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect object class during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2021 that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class which resulted in overcharges. These overstatements were corrected during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 for a total of $18,377 as noted below: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2022 totaled approximately $8,360,000. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their `Cost Transfer Policy? which states ?Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis?. The University?s cost transfer policy defines timely as ?occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)?. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted thirty-two of our sixty-seven sampled cost transfers (totaling $3,153,441 positive and $2,900,348 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 581 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (21 were between 91 and 180 days past, 6 were between 181 and 270 days past, and 5 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers, we noted the following exceptions: We noted a transaction which was originally recorded to an incorrect object class that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class that did not allow F&A costs to be applied: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that exceeded the amount of the award resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Positive cost transfers were approximately $4,060,000 and negative cost transfers were $3,510,000 during fiscal year 2022. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with activities allowed/unallowed and allowable costs/cost principles. Questioned Cost: Questioned costs are not determinable. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2022, they continued reconciliation procedures related to `grant level? activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday in the previous fiscal year. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual R&D Cluster agreement as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2021 001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University take a fresh look at its processes, policies and internal controls to determine what is needed, post Workday implementation, to prevent and detect noncompliance with activities allowed and unallowed and adherence to allowable cost principles/cost principles. Additionally, we recommend the University determine and address the underlying root cause that is contributing to the volume of cost transfers and take necessary action to prevent unallowable costs from posting to the grant. We also recommend the University consider implementation of an automated control to ensure F&A is charged appropriately when cost transfer entries are made. Lastly, we recommend the University determine what additional Workday automated reporting is available to monitor compliance for personnel expenses, including effort verification reporting, F&A, etc. for activities allowed or unallowed and allowable costs/cost principles.
Finding 2022 001 Federal Program Title ? Research & Development Cluster (R&D) Assistance Listing Nos. ? As listed on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Federal Agencies ? U.S. Department of Agriculture, U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Department of Defense, U.S. Department of Interior, U.S. Department of Justice, Department of State, U.S. Department of Transportation, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, National Endowment for the Humanities, National Science Foundation, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, U.S. Department of Energy, U.S. Department of Education, and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Award Numbers ? As listed on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Grant Award Periods ? Various Compliance Requirement ? Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Criteria: 2 CFR 200.430 includes the standards for documentation of personnel expenses. According to 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1), charges to federal awards for salary and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. Among other requirements within 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1), section (i) states records must be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated and section (v) states that the records must comply with established accounting policies and practices. Also, the HHS Grants Policy for educational institutions requires a plan confirmation system (system) for professorial and other professional staff members that is based on budgeted, planned, or assigned work activity and that is updated to reflect any significant changes in work distribution. The system must be incorporated into the organization?s official records and must identify activity applicable to each sponsored agreement and to each category needed to identify indirect costs and the functions to which they are allocable. At least annually, the employee, principal investigator, or responsible official will verify, by suitable means, that the work was performed and that the salaries and wages charged to sponsored agreements, whether as direct charges or in other categories of cost, are reasonable in relation to the work performed. A system, supported by after-the-fact activity reports, that reflects the distribution of covered employees? activity allocable to each grant and includes identification and recording of significant changes in work activity when initial charges were based on estimates. For professorial and other professional staff members, the activity reports will be prepared each academic term, but at least every 6 months. The University?s `Effort Reporting Policy? states ?Subjects must return the certified effort verification report no later than 30 calendar days after they have been distributed.? Additionally, as set forth in 2 CFR 200, the University is required to ensure allowable costs do not consist of improper payments, including payments that should not have been made or that were made in incorrect amounts (including overpayments and underpayments). Indirect costs are required to adhere to 2 CFR 200, Appendix III. Further, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official. Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and 45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: While performing procedures related to personnel expenses, we noted the University had not followed their `Effort Reporting Policy? which states ?Subjects must return the certified effort verification report no later than 30 calendar days after they have been distributed.? We noted two of our sixty sampled effort reports that had not been returned within the 30-calendar day policy. Total payroll and fringe totaled approximately $13,200,000 during fiscal year 2022. While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted three of forty sampled grants (totaling $3,385,750) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect object class that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class which resulted in overcharges during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 for a total overstatement of $1,888 as noted below: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Additionally, we noted indirect costs were overcharged for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $3,385,750) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect object class during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2021 that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class which resulted in overcharges. These overstatements were corrected during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 for a total of $18,377 as noted below: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2022 totaled approximately $8,360,000. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their `Cost Transfer Policy? which states ?Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis?. The University?s cost transfer policy defines timely as ?occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)?. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted thirty-two of our sixty-seven sampled cost transfers (totaling $3,153,441 positive and $2,900,348 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 581 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (21 were between 91 and 180 days past, 6 were between 181 and 270 days past, and 5 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers, we noted the following exceptions: We noted a transaction which was originally recorded to an incorrect object class that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class that did not allow F&A costs to be applied: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that exceeded the amount of the award resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Positive cost transfers were approximately $4,060,000 and negative cost transfers were $3,510,000 during fiscal year 2022. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with activities allowed/unallowed and allowable costs/cost principles. Questioned Cost: Questioned costs are not determinable. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2022, they continued reconciliation procedures related to `grant level? activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday in the previous fiscal year. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual R&D Cluster agreement as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2021 001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University take a fresh look at its processes, policies and internal controls to determine what is needed, post Workday implementation, to prevent and detect noncompliance with activities allowed and unallowed and adherence to allowable cost principles/cost principles. Additionally, we recommend the University determine and address the underlying root cause that is contributing to the volume of cost transfers and take necessary action to prevent unallowable costs from posting to the grant. We also recommend the University consider implementation of an automated control to ensure F&A is charged appropriately when cost transfer entries are made. Lastly, we recommend the University determine what additional Workday automated reporting is available to monitor compliance for personnel expenses, including effort verification reporting, F&A, etc. for activities allowed or unallowed and allowable costs/cost principles.
Finding 2022 001 Federal Program Title ? Research & Development Cluster (R&D) Assistance Listing Nos. ? As listed on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Federal Agencies ? U.S. Department of Agriculture, U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Department of Defense, U.S. Department of Interior, U.S. Department of Justice, Department of State, U.S. Department of Transportation, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, National Endowment for the Humanities, National Science Foundation, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, U.S. Department of Energy, U.S. Department of Education, and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Award Numbers ? As listed on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Grant Award Periods ? Various Compliance Requirement ? Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Criteria: 2 CFR 200.430 includes the standards for documentation of personnel expenses. According to 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1), charges to federal awards for salary and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. Among other requirements within 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1), section (i) states records must be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated and section (v) states that the records must comply with established accounting policies and practices. Also, the HHS Grants Policy for educational institutions requires a plan confirmation system (system) for professorial and other professional staff members that is based on budgeted, planned, or assigned work activity and that is updated to reflect any significant changes in work distribution. The system must be incorporated into the organization?s official records and must identify activity applicable to each sponsored agreement and to each category needed to identify indirect costs and the functions to which they are allocable. At least annually, the employee, principal investigator, or responsible official will verify, by suitable means, that the work was performed and that the salaries and wages charged to sponsored agreements, whether as direct charges or in other categories of cost, are reasonable in relation to the work performed. A system, supported by after-the-fact activity reports, that reflects the distribution of covered employees? activity allocable to each grant and includes identification and recording of significant changes in work activity when initial charges were based on estimates. For professorial and other professional staff members, the activity reports will be prepared each academic term, but at least every 6 months. The University?s `Effort Reporting Policy? states ?Subjects must return the certified effort verification report no later than 30 calendar days after they have been distributed.? Additionally, as set forth in 2 CFR 200, the University is required to ensure allowable costs do not consist of improper payments, including payments that should not have been made or that were made in incorrect amounts (including overpayments and underpayments). Indirect costs are required to adhere to 2 CFR 200, Appendix III. Further, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official. Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and 45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: While performing procedures related to personnel expenses, we noted the University had not followed their `Effort Reporting Policy? which states ?Subjects must return the certified effort verification report no later than 30 calendar days after they have been distributed.? We noted two of our sixty sampled effort reports that had not been returned within the 30-calendar day policy. Total payroll and fringe totaled approximately $13,200,000 during fiscal year 2022. While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted three of forty sampled grants (totaling $3,385,750) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect object class that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class which resulted in overcharges during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 for a total overstatement of $1,888 as noted below: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Additionally, we noted indirect costs were overcharged for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $3,385,750) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect object class during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2021 that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class which resulted in overcharges. These overstatements were corrected during the University?s fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 for a total of $18,377 as noted below: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2022 totaled approximately $8,360,000. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their `Cost Transfer Policy? which states ?Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis?. The University?s cost transfer policy defines timely as ?occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)?. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted thirty-two of our sixty-seven sampled cost transfers (totaling $3,153,441 positive and $2,900,348 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 581 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (21 were between 91 and 180 days past, 6 were between 181 and 270 days past, and 5 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers, we noted the following exceptions: We noted a transaction which was originally recorded to an incorrect object class that resulted in F&A being applied to the grant instead of to the correct object class that did not allow F&A costs to be applied: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that exceeded the amount of the award resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Positive cost transfers were approximately $4,060,000 and negative cost transfers were $3,510,000 during fiscal year 2022. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with activities allowed/unallowed and allowable costs/cost principles. Questioned Cost: Questioned costs are not determinable. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2022, they continued reconciliation procedures related to `grant level? activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday in the previous fiscal year. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual R&D Cluster agreement as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2021 001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University take a fresh look at its processes, policies and internal controls to determine what is needed, post Workday implementation, to prevent and detect noncompliance with activities allowed and unallowed and adherence to allowable cost principles/cost principles. Additionally, we recommend the University determine and address the underlying root cause that is contributing to the volume of cost transfers and take necessary action to prevent unallowable costs from posting to the grant. We also recommend the University consider implementation of an automated control to ensure F&A is charged appropriately when cost transfer entries are made. Lastly, we recommend the University determine what additional Workday automated reporting is available to monitor compliance for personnel expenses, including effort verification reporting, F&A, etc. for activities allowed or unallowed and allowable costs/cost principles.