Grant Title: Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies (Title I) Federal Award Number and Year: 2024 Assistance Listing #: 84.010A Federal Agency: US Department of Education Pass-through Entity number: 43 Pass-through Agency: WV Department of Education Grant Title: Special Education Cluster: Special Education - Grants to States, Special Education -Preschool Grants, COVID-19 Special Educatin Preschool Grants Federal Award Number and Year: 2024 Assistance Listing #: 84.027A, 84.173, 84.173A and 84.173X Federal Agency: US Department of Education Pass-through Entity number: 43 Pass-through Agency: WV Department of Education Grant Title: Child Nutrition Cluster: School Breakfast Program and National School Lunch Program Federal Award Number and Year: 2024 Assistance Listing #: 10.553 and 10.555 Federal Agency: US Department of Agriculture Pass-through Entity number: 88 Pass-through Agency: WV Department of Education Grant Title: COVID-19 American Rescue Plan Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund - Education Stabilization Fund (ESSER) Federal Award Number and Year: 2024 Assistance Listing #: 84.425U, 84.425W Federal Agency: US Department of Education Pass-through Entity number: 52 Pass-through Agency: WV Department of Education CONDITION: Several expenditures were not properly approved by the Federal Program Directors. In addition, signed purchase orders or other supporting documentation were not available for all expenditures. Management did not ensure that expenditures were allowable for the Title I, Special Education Cluster, Child Nutrition Cluster, and ESSER programs. CONTEXT: Specifically, we identified the following: Sixty non-payroll expenditure transactions were sampled for Title I Grants to Local Education Agencies, of which Two expenditures, or 3% of the sample size, totaling $4,518, did not have Program Director approval prior to payment. Seven expenditures, or 12% of the sample size, totaling $162,988, to one vendor in which the contract was not available for review for contracted services. Three expenditures, or 5% of the sample size, totaling $5,040, which were not supported with adequate documentation. Two expenditures, or 3% of the sample size, totaling $4,525, in which the purchase order was dated after the invoice. Ten non-payroll expenditure transactions were sampled for the COVID-19 American Rescue Plan Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER) Fund - Education Stabilization Fund, of which Five expenditures, or 50% of the sample size, totaling $913,518, did not have Program Director approval prior to payment. Two expenditures, or 20% of the sample size, totaling $28,036, in which the purchase order was dated after the invoice. In addition, we tested 5 employee personnel files with 50 related payroll expenditures for the above federal programs and noted the following items: Three employees did not have a WV IT-104 withholding form. One employee did not have a valid employment contract in their file. Five employees did not have a years of experience ledger in the file in order to recalculate pay. One employee did not have an IRS W-4 withholding form. Sixty non-payroll expenditure transactions were sampled for the Child Nutrition Cluster, of which Two expenditures, or 3% of the sample size, totaling $388,297, did not have Program Director approval prior to payment. Six expenditures, or 10% of the sample size, totaling $57,115, in which the expenditures did not reconcile with the supporting documentation. Forty-one non-payroll expenditure transactions were sampled for the Special Education Cluster, of which Five expenditures, or 12% of the sample size totaling $4,392 in which expenditures were made without a contract or the amounts paid were not provided for in the contract. Six expenditures, or 15% of the sample size, totaling $10,850, in which the purchase order was dated after the invoice. Forty-one expenditures, or 100% could not be traced to a project application. In addition, we tested 7 employee personnel files with 19 related payroll expenditures for the above federal programs and noted the following items: Three employees were paid a total of $219,529 from the Special Education Cluster that should not have been paid with federal funds. Five employees did not have a valid employment contract in their file.Six employees were paid supplements and did not have support in their file. Two employees did not have a valid extra-duty employment contract in their file. Three employees did not have an IRS W-4 withholding form. Four employees did not have a WV IT-104 withholding form. Seven employees did not have a years of experience ledger in the file in order to recalculate pay. CRITERIA: Proper internal controls include maintaining an adequate filing system in order to safeguard records and documents and procedures that ensure all purchases are approved by reconciling a purchase order to the invoice from the vendor prior to payment. Additionally, Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) §200.334 states, in part, that: "Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal entity records pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report or, for Federal awards that are renewed quarterly or annually, from the date of the submission of the quarterly or annual financial report, respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity in the case of a subrecipient." Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) §200.403 states, in part, that: "Except where otherwise authorized by statue, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal Awards: ...(c) Be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the non-Federal entity. (f) Not be included as a cost or used to meet cost sharing or matching requirements of any other federally-financed program in either the current or a prior period... (g) Be adequately documented." QUESTIONED COSTS: Unknown. CAUSE: Procedures were not in place to ensure that invoices and supporting documentation were maintained for all expenditures and that each expenditure was properly approved. Management of the Board does not have controls in place to comply with the Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200 and Title 34 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 75. EFFECT: Certain funds were not expended in accordance with requirements of their respective programs, and auditors were unable to determine the allowability of expenditures due to inadequate documentation. This issue contributed to the disclaimer of opinion on compliance for the Title I, Special Education Cluster, Child Nutrition Cluster, and ESSER Programs. REPEAT FINDING: Yes PRIOR YEAR FINDING NUMBER: 2023-022 RECOMMENDATION: Board officials should establish and follow procedures to require: All purchase orders be issued prior to the purchase and receipt of the invoice, Contracts for contracted services be available for review, and All personnel files be complete and have adequate support for payroll expenditures.The officials of the Upshur County Board of Education should review the existing procedures and controls over federal award expenditures to determine that these controls are implemented, and working effectively to ensure that expenditures are properly authorized prior to payment. Board officials should ensure that all expenditures are properly authorized by the respective program directors. The Board officials should consider additional training, internal reviews, cross-training of employees, and other measures as deemed appropriate to ensure existing controls are implemented.
Grant Title: Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies (Title I) Federal Award Number and Year: 2024 Assistance Listing #: 84.010A Federal Agency: US Department of Education Pass-through Entity number: 43 Pass-through Agency: WV Department of Education Grant Title: Special Education Cluster: Special Education - Grants to States, Special Education -Preschool Grants, COVID-19 Special Educatin Preschool Grants Federal Award Number and Year: 2024 Assistance Listing #: 84.027A, 84.173, 84.173A and 84.173X Federal Agency: US Department of Education Pass-through Entity number: 43 Pass-through Agency: WV Department of Education Grant Title: Child Nutrition Cluster: School Breakfast Program and National School Lunch Program Federal Award Number and Year: 2024 Assistance Listing #: 10.553 and 10.555 Federal Agency: US Department of Agriculture Pass-through Entity number: 88 Pass-through Agency: WV Department of Education Grant Title: COVID-19 American Rescue Plan Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund - Education Stabilization Fund (ESSER) Federal Award Number and Year: 2024 Assistance Listing #: 84.425U, 84.425W Federal Agency: US Department of Education Pass-through Entity number: 52 Pass-through Agency: WV Department of Education CONDITION: Several expenditures were not properly approved by the Federal Program Directors. In addition, signed purchase orders or other supporting documentation were not available for all expenditures. Management did not ensure that expenditures were allowable for the Title I, Special Education Cluster, Child Nutrition Cluster, and ESSER programs. CONTEXT: Specifically, we identified the following: Sixty non-payroll expenditure transactions were sampled for Title I Grants to Local Education Agencies, of which Two expenditures, or 3% of the sample size, totaling $4,518, did not have Program Director approval prior to payment. Seven expenditures, or 12% of the sample size, totaling $162,988, to one vendor in which the contract was not available for review for contracted services. Three expenditures, or 5% of the sample size, totaling $5,040, which were not supported with adequate documentation. Two expenditures, or 3% of the sample size, totaling $4,525, in which the purchase order was dated after the invoice. Ten non-payroll expenditure transactions were sampled for the COVID-19 American Rescue Plan Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER) Fund - Education Stabilization Fund, of which Five expenditures, or 50% of the sample size, totaling $913,518, did not have Program Director approval prior to payment. Two expenditures, or 20% of the sample size, totaling $28,036, in which the purchase order was dated after the invoice. In addition, we tested 5 employee personnel files with 50 related payroll expenditures for the above federal programs and noted the following items: Three employees did not have a WV IT-104 withholding form. One employee did not have a valid employment contract in their file. Five employees did not have a years of experience ledger in the file in order to recalculate pay. One employee did not have an IRS W-4 withholding form. Sixty non-payroll expenditure transactions were sampled for the Child Nutrition Cluster, of which Two expenditures, or 3% of the sample size, totaling $388,297, did not have Program Director approval prior to payment. Six expenditures, or 10% of the sample size, totaling $57,115, in which the expenditures did not reconcile with the supporting documentation. Forty-one non-payroll expenditure transactions were sampled for the Special Education Cluster, of which Five expenditures, or 12% of the sample size totaling $4,392 in which expenditures were made without a contract or the amounts paid were not provided for in the contract. Six expenditures, or 15% of the sample size, totaling $10,850, in which the purchase order was dated after the invoice. Forty-one expenditures, or 100% could not be traced to a project application. In addition, we tested 7 employee personnel files with 19 related payroll expenditures for the above federal programs and noted the following items: Three employees were paid a total of $219,529 from the Special Education Cluster that should not have been paid with federal funds. Five employees did not have a valid employment contract in their file.Six employees were paid supplements and did not have support in their file. Two employees did not have a valid extra-duty employment contract in their file. Three employees did not have an IRS W-4 withholding form. Four employees did not have a WV IT-104 withholding form. Seven employees did not have a years of experience ledger in the file in order to recalculate pay. CRITERIA: Proper internal controls include maintaining an adequate filing system in order to safeguard records and documents and procedures that ensure all purchases are approved by reconciling a purchase order to the invoice from the vendor prior to payment. Additionally, Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) §200.334 states, in part, that: "Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal entity records pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report or, for Federal awards that are renewed quarterly or annually, from the date of the submission of the quarterly or annual financial report, respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity in the case of a subrecipient." Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) §200.403 states, in part, that: "Except where otherwise authorized by statue, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal Awards: ...(c) Be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the non-Federal entity. (f) Not be included as a cost or used to meet cost sharing or matching requirements of any other federally-financed program in either the current or a prior period... (g) Be adequately documented." QUESTIONED COSTS: Unknown. CAUSE: Procedures were not in place to ensure that invoices and supporting documentation were maintained for all expenditures and that each expenditure was properly approved. Management of the Board does not have controls in place to comply with the Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200 and Title 34 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 75. EFFECT: Certain funds were not expended in accordance with requirements of their respective programs, and auditors were unable to determine the allowability of expenditures due to inadequate documentation. This issue contributed to the disclaimer of opinion on compliance for the Title I, Special Education Cluster, Child Nutrition Cluster, and ESSER Programs. REPEAT FINDING: Yes PRIOR YEAR FINDING NUMBER: 2023-022 RECOMMENDATION: Board officials should establish and follow procedures to require: All purchase orders be issued prior to the purchase and receipt of the invoice, Contracts for contracted services be available for review, and All personnel files be complete and have adequate support for payroll expenditures.The officials of the Upshur County Board of Education should review the existing procedures and controls over federal award expenditures to determine that these controls are implemented, and working effectively to ensure that expenditures are properly authorized prior to payment. Board officials should ensure that all expenditures are properly authorized by the respective program directors. The Board officials should consider additional training, internal reviews, cross-training of employees, and other measures as deemed appropriate to ensure existing controls are implemented.
Grant Title: Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies (Title I) Federal Award Number and Year: 2024 Assistance Listing #: 84.010A Federal Agency: US Department of Education Pass-through Entity number: 43 Pass-through Agency: WV Department of Education Grant Title: Special Education Cluster: Special Education - Grants to States, Special Education -Preschool Grants, COVID-19 Special Educatin Preschool Grants Federal Award Number and Year: 2024 Assistance Listing #: 84.027A, 84.173, 84.173A and 84.173X Federal Agency: US Department of Education Pass-through Entity number: 43 Pass-through Agency: WV Department of Education Grant Title: Child Nutrition Cluster: School Breakfast Program and National School Lunch Program Federal Award Number and Year: 2024 Assistance Listing #: 10.553 and 10.555 Federal Agency: US Department of Agriculture Pass-through Entity number: 88 Pass-through Agency: WV Department of Education Grant Title: COVID-19 American Rescue Plan Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund - Education Stabilization Fund (ESSER) Federal Award Number and Year: 2024 Assistance Listing #: 84.425U, 84.425W Federal Agency: US Department of Education Pass-through Entity number: 52 Pass-through Agency: WV Department of Education CONDITION: Several expenditures were not properly approved by the Federal Program Directors. In addition, signed purchase orders or other supporting documentation were not available for all expenditures. Management did not ensure that expenditures were allowable for the Title I, Special Education Cluster, Child Nutrition Cluster, and ESSER programs. CONTEXT: Specifically, we identified the following: Sixty non-payroll expenditure transactions were sampled for Title I Grants to Local Education Agencies, of which Two expenditures, or 3% of the sample size, totaling $4,518, did not have Program Director approval prior to payment. Seven expenditures, or 12% of the sample size, totaling $162,988, to one vendor in which the contract was not available for review for contracted services. Three expenditures, or 5% of the sample size, totaling $5,040, which were not supported with adequate documentation. Two expenditures, or 3% of the sample size, totaling $4,525, in which the purchase order was dated after the invoice. Ten non-payroll expenditure transactions were sampled for the COVID-19 American Rescue Plan Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER) Fund - Education Stabilization Fund, of which Five expenditures, or 50% of the sample size, totaling $913,518, did not have Program Director approval prior to payment. Two expenditures, or 20% of the sample size, totaling $28,036, in which the purchase order was dated after the invoice. In addition, we tested 5 employee personnel files with 50 related payroll expenditures for the above federal programs and noted the following items: Three employees did not have a WV IT-104 withholding form. One employee did not have a valid employment contract in their file. Five employees did not have a years of experience ledger in the file in order to recalculate pay. One employee did not have an IRS W-4 withholding form. Sixty non-payroll expenditure transactions were sampled for the Child Nutrition Cluster, of which Two expenditures, or 3% of the sample size, totaling $388,297, did not have Program Director approval prior to payment. Six expenditures, or 10% of the sample size, totaling $57,115, in which the expenditures did not reconcile with the supporting documentation. Forty-one non-payroll expenditure transactions were sampled for the Special Education Cluster, of which Five expenditures, or 12% of the sample size totaling $4,392 in which expenditures were made without a contract or the amounts paid were not provided for in the contract. Six expenditures, or 15% of the sample size, totaling $10,850, in which the purchase order was dated after the invoice. Forty-one expenditures, or 100% could not be traced to a project application. In addition, we tested 7 employee personnel files with 19 related payroll expenditures for the above federal programs and noted the following items: Three employees were paid a total of $219,529 from the Special Education Cluster that should not have been paid with federal funds. Five employees did not have a valid employment contract in their file.Six employees were paid supplements and did not have support in their file. Two employees did not have a valid extra-duty employment contract in their file. Three employees did not have an IRS W-4 withholding form. Four employees did not have a WV IT-104 withholding form. Seven employees did not have a years of experience ledger in the file in order to recalculate pay. CRITERIA: Proper internal controls include maintaining an adequate filing system in order to safeguard records and documents and procedures that ensure all purchases are approved by reconciling a purchase order to the invoice from the vendor prior to payment. Additionally, Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) §200.334 states, in part, that: "Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal entity records pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report or, for Federal awards that are renewed quarterly or annually, from the date of the submission of the quarterly or annual financial report, respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity in the case of a subrecipient." Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) §200.403 states, in part, that: "Except where otherwise authorized by statue, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal Awards: ...(c) Be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the non-Federal entity. (f) Not be included as a cost or used to meet cost sharing or matching requirements of any other federally-financed program in either the current or a prior period... (g) Be adequately documented." QUESTIONED COSTS: Unknown. CAUSE: Procedures were not in place to ensure that invoices and supporting documentation were maintained for all expenditures and that each expenditure was properly approved. Management of the Board does not have controls in place to comply with the Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200 and Title 34 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 75. EFFECT: Certain funds were not expended in accordance with requirements of their respective programs, and auditors were unable to determine the allowability of expenditures due to inadequate documentation. This issue contributed to the disclaimer of opinion on compliance for the Title I, Special Education Cluster, Child Nutrition Cluster, and ESSER Programs. REPEAT FINDING: Yes PRIOR YEAR FINDING NUMBER: 2023-022 RECOMMENDATION: Board officials should establish and follow procedures to require: All purchase orders be issued prior to the purchase and receipt of the invoice, Contracts for contracted services be available for review, and All personnel files be complete and have adequate support for payroll expenditures.The officials of the Upshur County Board of Education should review the existing procedures and controls over federal award expenditures to determine that these controls are implemented, and working effectively to ensure that expenditures are properly authorized prior to payment. Board officials should ensure that all expenditures are properly authorized by the respective program directors. The Board officials should consider additional training, internal reviews, cross-training of employees, and other measures as deemed appropriate to ensure existing controls are implemented.
Grant Title: Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies (Title I) Federal Award Number and Year: 2024 Assistance Listing #: 84.010A Federal Agency: US Department of Education Pass-through Entity number: 43 Pass-through Agency: WV Department of Education Grant Title: Special Education Cluster: Special Education - Grants to States, Special Education -Preschool Grants, COVID-19 Special Educatin Preschool Grants Federal Award Number and Year: 2024 Assistance Listing #: 84.027A, 84.173, 84.173A and 84.173X Federal Agency: US Department of Education Pass-through Entity number: 43 Pass-through Agency: WV Department of Education Grant Title: Child Nutrition Cluster: School Breakfast Program and National School Lunch Program Federal Award Number and Year: 2024 Assistance Listing #: 10.553 and 10.555 Federal Agency: US Department of Agriculture Pass-through Entity number: 88 Pass-through Agency: WV Department of Education Grant Title: COVID-19 American Rescue Plan Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund - Education Stabilization Fund (ESSER) Federal Award Number and Year: 2024 Assistance Listing #: 84.425U, 84.425W Federal Agency: US Department of Education Pass-through Entity number: 52 Pass-through Agency: WV Department of Education CONDITION: Several expenditures were not properly approved by the Federal Program Directors. In addition, signed purchase orders or other supporting documentation were not available for all expenditures. Management did not ensure that expenditures were allowable for the Title I, Special Education Cluster, Child Nutrition Cluster, and ESSER programs. CONTEXT: Specifically, we identified the following: Sixty non-payroll expenditure transactions were sampled for Title I Grants to Local Education Agencies, of which Two expenditures, or 3% of the sample size, totaling $4,518, did not have Program Director approval prior to payment. Seven expenditures, or 12% of the sample size, totaling $162,988, to one vendor in which the contract was not available for review for contracted services. Three expenditures, or 5% of the sample size, totaling $5,040, which were not supported with adequate documentation. Two expenditures, or 3% of the sample size, totaling $4,525, in which the purchase order was dated after the invoice. Ten non-payroll expenditure transactions were sampled for the COVID-19 American Rescue Plan Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER) Fund - Education Stabilization Fund, of which Five expenditures, or 50% of the sample size, totaling $913,518, did not have Program Director approval prior to payment. Two expenditures, or 20% of the sample size, totaling $28,036, in which the purchase order was dated after the invoice. In addition, we tested 5 employee personnel files with 50 related payroll expenditures for the above federal programs and noted the following items: Three employees did not have a WV IT-104 withholding form. One employee did not have a valid employment contract in their file. Five employees did not have a years of experience ledger in the file in order to recalculate pay. One employee did not have an IRS W-4 withholding form. Sixty non-payroll expenditure transactions were sampled for the Child Nutrition Cluster, of which Two expenditures, or 3% of the sample size, totaling $388,297, did not have Program Director approval prior to payment. Six expenditures, or 10% of the sample size, totaling $57,115, in which the expenditures did not reconcile with the supporting documentation. Forty-one non-payroll expenditure transactions were sampled for the Special Education Cluster, of which Five expenditures, or 12% of the sample size totaling $4,392 in which expenditures were made without a contract or the amounts paid were not provided for in the contract. Six expenditures, or 15% of the sample size, totaling $10,850, in which the purchase order was dated after the invoice. Forty-one expenditures, or 100% could not be traced to a project application. In addition, we tested 7 employee personnel files with 19 related payroll expenditures for the above federal programs and noted the following items: Three employees were paid a total of $219,529 from the Special Education Cluster that should not have been paid with federal funds. Five employees did not have a valid employment contract in their file.Six employees were paid supplements and did not have support in their file. Two employees did not have a valid extra-duty employment contract in their file. Three employees did not have an IRS W-4 withholding form. Four employees did not have a WV IT-104 withholding form. Seven employees did not have a years of experience ledger in the file in order to recalculate pay. CRITERIA: Proper internal controls include maintaining an adequate filing system in order to safeguard records and documents and procedures that ensure all purchases are approved by reconciling a purchase order to the invoice from the vendor prior to payment. Additionally, Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) §200.334 states, in part, that: "Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal entity records pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report or, for Federal awards that are renewed quarterly or annually, from the date of the submission of the quarterly or annual financial report, respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity in the case of a subrecipient." Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) §200.403 states, in part, that: "Except where otherwise authorized by statue, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal Awards: ...(c) Be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the non-Federal entity. (f) Not be included as a cost or used to meet cost sharing or matching requirements of any other federally-financed program in either the current or a prior period... (g) Be adequately documented." QUESTIONED COSTS: Unknown. CAUSE: Procedures were not in place to ensure that invoices and supporting documentation were maintained for all expenditures and that each expenditure was properly approved. Management of the Board does not have controls in place to comply with the Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200 and Title 34 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 75. EFFECT: Certain funds were not expended in accordance with requirements of their respective programs, and auditors were unable to determine the allowability of expenditures due to inadequate documentation. This issue contributed to the disclaimer of opinion on compliance for the Title I, Special Education Cluster, Child Nutrition Cluster, and ESSER Programs. REPEAT FINDING: Yes PRIOR YEAR FINDING NUMBER: 2023-022 RECOMMENDATION: Board officials should establish and follow procedures to require: All purchase orders be issued prior to the purchase and receipt of the invoice, Contracts for contracted services be available for review, and All personnel files be complete and have adequate support for payroll expenditures.The officials of the Upshur County Board of Education should review the existing procedures and controls over federal award expenditures to determine that these controls are implemented, and working effectively to ensure that expenditures are properly authorized prior to payment. Board officials should ensure that all expenditures are properly authorized by the respective program directors. The Board officials should consider additional training, internal reviews, cross-training of employees, and other measures as deemed appropriate to ensure existing controls are implemented.
Grant Title: Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies (Title I) Federal Award Number and Year: 2024 Assistance Listing #: 84.010A Federal Agency: US Department of Education Pass-through Entity number: 43 Pass-through Agency: WV Department of Education Grant Title: Special Education Cluster: Special Education - Grants to States, Special Education -Preschool Grants, COVID-19 Special Educatin Preschool Grants Federal Award Number and Year: 2024 Assistance Listing #: 84.027A, 84.173, 84.173A and 84.173X Federal Agency: US Department of Education Pass-through Entity number: 43 Pass-through Agency: WV Department of Education Grant Title: Child Nutrition Cluster: School Breakfast Program and National School Lunch Program Federal Award Number and Year: 2024 Assistance Listing #: 10.553 and 10.555 Federal Agency: US Department of Agriculture Pass-through Entity number: 88 Pass-through Agency: WV Department of Education Grant Title: COVID-19 American Rescue Plan Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund - Education Stabilization Fund (ESSER) Federal Award Number and Year: 2024 Assistance Listing #: 84.425U, 84.425W Federal Agency: US Department of Education Pass-through Entity number: 52 Pass-through Agency: WV Department of Education CONDITION: Several expenditures were not properly approved by the Federal Program Directors. In addition, signed purchase orders or other supporting documentation were not available for all expenditures. Management did not ensure that expenditures were allowable for the Title I, Special Education Cluster, Child Nutrition Cluster, and ESSER programs. CONTEXT: Specifically, we identified the following: Sixty non-payroll expenditure transactions were sampled for Title I Grants to Local Education Agencies, of which Two expenditures, or 3% of the sample size, totaling $4,518, did not have Program Director approval prior to payment. Seven expenditures, or 12% of the sample size, totaling $162,988, to one vendor in which the contract was not available for review for contracted services. Three expenditures, or 5% of the sample size, totaling $5,040, which were not supported with adequate documentation. Two expenditures, or 3% of the sample size, totaling $4,525, in which the purchase order was dated after the invoice. Ten non-payroll expenditure transactions were sampled for the COVID-19 American Rescue Plan Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER) Fund - Education Stabilization Fund, of which Five expenditures, or 50% of the sample size, totaling $913,518, did not have Program Director approval prior to payment. Two expenditures, or 20% of the sample size, totaling $28,036, in which the purchase order was dated after the invoice. In addition, we tested 5 employee personnel files with 50 related payroll expenditures for the above federal programs and noted the following items: Three employees did not have a WV IT-104 withholding form. One employee did not have a valid employment contract in their file. Five employees did not have a years of experience ledger in the file in order to recalculate pay. One employee did not have an IRS W-4 withholding form. Sixty non-payroll expenditure transactions were sampled for the Child Nutrition Cluster, of which Two expenditures, or 3% of the sample size, totaling $388,297, did not have Program Director approval prior to payment. Six expenditures, or 10% of the sample size, totaling $57,115, in which the expenditures did not reconcile with the supporting documentation. Forty-one non-payroll expenditure transactions were sampled for the Special Education Cluster, of which Five expenditures, or 12% of the sample size totaling $4,392 in which expenditures were made without a contract or the amounts paid were not provided for in the contract. Six expenditures, or 15% of the sample size, totaling $10,850, in which the purchase order was dated after the invoice. Forty-one expenditures, or 100% could not be traced to a project application. In addition, we tested 7 employee personnel files with 19 related payroll expenditures for the above federal programs and noted the following items: Three employees were paid a total of $219,529 from the Special Education Cluster that should not have been paid with federal funds. Five employees did not have a valid employment contract in their file.Six employees were paid supplements and did not have support in their file. Two employees did not have a valid extra-duty employment contract in their file. Three employees did not have an IRS W-4 withholding form. Four employees did not have a WV IT-104 withholding form. Seven employees did not have a years of experience ledger in the file in order to recalculate pay. CRITERIA: Proper internal controls include maintaining an adequate filing system in order to safeguard records and documents and procedures that ensure all purchases are approved by reconciling a purchase order to the invoice from the vendor prior to payment. Additionally, Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) §200.334 states, in part, that: "Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal entity records pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report or, for Federal awards that are renewed quarterly or annually, from the date of the submission of the quarterly or annual financial report, respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity in the case of a subrecipient." Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) §200.403 states, in part, that: "Except where otherwise authorized by statue, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal Awards: ...(c) Be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the non-Federal entity. (f) Not be included as a cost or used to meet cost sharing or matching requirements of any other federally-financed program in either the current or a prior period... (g) Be adequately documented." QUESTIONED COSTS: Unknown. CAUSE: Procedures were not in place to ensure that invoices and supporting documentation were maintained for all expenditures and that each expenditure was properly approved. Management of the Board does not have controls in place to comply with the Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200 and Title 34 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 75. EFFECT: Certain funds were not expended in accordance with requirements of their respective programs, and auditors were unable to determine the allowability of expenditures due to inadequate documentation. This issue contributed to the disclaimer of opinion on compliance for the Title I, Special Education Cluster, Child Nutrition Cluster, and ESSER Programs. REPEAT FINDING: Yes PRIOR YEAR FINDING NUMBER: 2023-022 RECOMMENDATION: Board officials should establish and follow procedures to require: All purchase orders be issued prior to the purchase and receipt of the invoice, Contracts for contracted services be available for review, and All personnel files be complete and have adequate support for payroll expenditures.The officials of the Upshur County Board of Education should review the existing procedures and controls over federal award expenditures to determine that these controls are implemented, and working effectively to ensure that expenditures are properly authorized prior to payment. Board officials should ensure that all expenditures are properly authorized by the respective program directors. The Board officials should consider additional training, internal reviews, cross-training of employees, and other measures as deemed appropriate to ensure existing controls are implemented.
Assistance Listings number and name: 21.023 COVID-19 - Emergency Rental Assistance Program Award numbers and years: 1505-0270, May 5, 2021 through September 30, 2025; 23*019, May 5, 2021 through September 30, 2025; 23*056, May 5, 2021 through September 30, 2025; 23*064, May 5, 2021 through September 30, 2025 Assistance Listings number and name: 21.027 COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Award numbers and years: 1505-0271, March 3, 2021 through December 31, 2024; 19418, May 31, 2023 through September 30, 2023 Federal agency: U.S. Department of the Treasury Compliance requirement: Reporting Questioned costs: Not applicable Condition—Contrary to federal regulation and guidance, for information it reported to the federal agency for its Emergency Rental Assistance (ERA) Program and Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF) programs, the County’s Grants Management and Innovation Department (Department) did not retain documentation to support 8 reports we tested and did not always report accurate information or required elements. Specifically, we found that the Department: • Did not retain documentation for 4 ERA and 4 SLFRF reports—The Department did not retain documentation, like system reports, screenshots, or queries, to support the information it reported for 4 ERA and 4 SLFRF quarterly reports we tested.1 • Did not accurately report information for 4 SLFRF reports—The Department incorrectly reported information for the 4 SLFRF quarterly reports specified in the previous bullet. Specifically, the Department understated cumulative program expenditures by nearly $14.6 million, or 10% of total cumulative program expenditures, as of June 30, 2024. • Failed to report required elements for 2 ERA reports—The Department did not report all key performance and financial reporting data points required by the federal agency in 2 of 4 ERA quarterly reports we tested, thereby limiting the amount of data we could audit. Specifically, the Department did not submit: o Demographic information for the ERA2 – Q2 2023 report due August 16, 2023. o Any performance or financial reporting data for the ERA2 – Q3 2023 report due November 15, 2023. As of June 30, 2024, the County spent $77.6 million, or 99% of the nearly $77.7 million of ERA program monies, and $147.1 million, or 72% of the over $203.4 million of SLFRF program monies, advanced in fiscal year 2021. Effect—The Department’s failure to report required elements and accurate program information in its reports and to retain associated documentation for audit purposes resulted in us being unable to determine whether the reports were complete and accurate. Also, it results in the federal agency being unable to rely on the reports to monitor the Department’s program administration, including its compliance with program requirements and ability to prevent and detect fraud, and to evaluate the program’s success. Further, the Department is unable to resubmit reports because the federal agency does not allow grantees to revise reports after the reporting period has closed.2,4 Finally, the Department is at risk that this finding applies to other federal programs it administers. Cause—As described in finding 2024-103, the Department did not develop, document, or implement internal control procedures to monitor compliance with the programs’ reporting requirements. Specifically, the Department did not perform an independent review and approval of reports prior to submitting them to the federal grantor to ensure the reported expenditures were accurate, agreed to the County’s records, and contained only allowable expenses. Department management reported that it had performed independent reviews and approvals of all reports but did not maintain documentation because the Department did not have a formal policy requiring a documented review and approval of its reports. Further, the Department did not have a process to track when each report was required to be completed and did not verify that reports were submitted by the designated due dates. Additionally, Department management reported that it had significant staff turnover between fiscal years, resulting in current staff being unaware of how past reports were prepared and what supporting documentation was used. Further, Department management reported that there were many challenges in using the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s portal, including the inability to make changes to submitted reports after the reporting period ended. Criteria—Federal agency guidance requires the Department to report accurate and complete information for the ERA and SLFRF quarterly reports.3,4 Also, federal regulation and Department retention policies require the Department to retain all records relating to a federal award for a period of 3 years from the date of its submission of the final expenditure report (2 CFR §200.334).5 Further, federal regulation requires establishing and maintaining effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that federal programs are being managed in compliance with all applicable laws, regulations, and award terms (2 CFR §200.303). Recommendations to the Department— 1. Prepare and retain detailed documentation, such as system reports, screenshots, or queries, to ensure accurate and complete program information is reported to the federal agency for each federal program. 2. Follow its retention policies and procedures and federal regulation requirements to retain all records relating to a federal award for a period of 3 years from the date of its submission of the final expenditure report. 3. Develop, document, and implement policies and procedures and train responsible employees to monitor compliance with the program’s reporting requirements, including processes to: a. Reconcile expenditure amounts reported to the County’s accounting records and investigate and resolve any differences prior to submitting the reports to the federal agencies. b. Perform and document an independent review and approval of all federal program reports before submitting them to the federal agency to ensure reports are accurate, agree to County records, and contain only allowable expenditures. c. Create a tracking mechanism to ensure reports are completed and submitted by the designated due dates. 4. Work with the U.S. Department of the Treasury to determine if it will require and allow the Department to adjust and resubmit previously submitted reports to correct detected errors and/or missing information. The County’s corrective action plan at the end of this report includes the views and planned corrective action of its responsible officials. We are not required to audit and have not audited these responses and planned corrective actions and therefore provide no assurances as to their accuracy. 1 The Department did not retain documentation for the following ERA quarterly reports: ERA2 - Q2 2023, Q3 2023, Q4 2023, and Q1 2024. Further, the Department did not retain documentation for the following SLFRF quarterly Project and Expenditure Reports: April 1, 2023 through June 30, 2023; July 1, 2023 through September 30, 2023; October 1, 2023 through December 31, 2023; and January 1, 2024 through March 31, 2024. 2 On April 2, 2024, the U.S. Department of the Treasury updated its ERA2 Treasury Portal User Guide, which indicates that the grantee can only resubmit a report before the reporting deadline. (U.S. Department of the Treasury. [2024, April]. Emergency Rental Assistance Program [ERA2] Treasury Portal User Guide, Version 3.0. Retrieved 4/7/2025 from https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/136/ERA2-Portal-Users-Guide.pdf). 3 The U.S. Department of the Treasury requires the Department to submit accurate and complete ERA quarterly reports of cumulative programmatic and financial information covering the period from receipt of awards to the end of the current quarterly reporting period (U.S. Department of the Treasury. [2024, September]. Emergency Rental Assistance Program [ERA2] Reporting Guidance, Version 3.0. Retrieved 4/7/2025 from https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/136/ERA2-Reporting-Guidance.pdf). 4 On April 7, 2023, the U.S. Department of the Treasury updated its Project and Expenditure Report User Guide State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, which indicates that the grantee can only resubmit a report before the reporting deadline. Further, the U.S. Department of the Treasury requires the Department to submit accurate and complete SLFRF quarterly project and expenditure reports that provide information on projects funded, expenditures, and contracts and subawards greater than or equal to $50,000, and other information required from recipients. (U.S. Department of the Treasury. [2023, April]. Project and Expenditure Report User Guide State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, Version 2. Retrieved 4/7/2025 from https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/136/ERA2-Reporting-Guidance.pdf). 5 Pima County’s record retention schedule requires federal grant records to be retained after quarterly, annual, or final expenditure reports are submitted and approved or after funding agency requirements are met, whichever is longer (Pima County. [2023, December]. Pima County Record Retention Schedule).
Assistance Listings number and name: 21.023 COVID-19 - Emergency Rental Assistance Program Award numbers and years: 1505-0270, May 5, 2021 through September 30, 2025; 23*019, May 5, 2021 through September 30, 2025; 23*056, May 5, 2021 through September 30, 2025; 23*064, May 5, 2021 through September 30, 2025 Assistance Listings number and name: 21.027 COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Award numbers and years: 1505-0271, March 3, 2021 through December 31, 2024; 19418, May 31, 2023 through September 30, 2023 Federal agency: U.S. Department of the Treasury Compliance requirement: Reporting Questioned costs: Not applicable Condition—Contrary to federal regulation and guidance, for information it reported to the federal agency for its Emergency Rental Assistance (ERA) Program and Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF) programs, the County’s Grants Management and Innovation Department (Department) did not retain documentation to support 8 reports we tested and did not always report accurate information or required elements. Specifically, we found that the Department: • Did not retain documentation for 4 ERA and 4 SLFRF reports—The Department did not retain documentation, like system reports, screenshots, or queries, to support the information it reported for 4 ERA and 4 SLFRF quarterly reports we tested.1 • Did not accurately report information for 4 SLFRF reports—The Department incorrectly reported information for the 4 SLFRF quarterly reports specified in the previous bullet. Specifically, the Department understated cumulative program expenditures by nearly $14.6 million, or 10% of total cumulative program expenditures, as of June 30, 2024. • Failed to report required elements for 2 ERA reports—The Department did not report all key performance and financial reporting data points required by the federal agency in 2 of 4 ERA quarterly reports we tested, thereby limiting the amount of data we could audit. Specifically, the Department did not submit: o Demographic information for the ERA2 – Q2 2023 report due August 16, 2023. o Any performance or financial reporting data for the ERA2 – Q3 2023 report due November 15, 2023. As of June 30, 2024, the County spent $77.6 million, or 99% of the nearly $77.7 million of ERA program monies, and $147.1 million, or 72% of the over $203.4 million of SLFRF program monies, advanced in fiscal year 2021. Effect—The Department’s failure to report required elements and accurate program information in its reports and to retain associated documentation for audit purposes resulted in us being unable to determine whether the reports were complete and accurate. Also, it results in the federal agency being unable to rely on the reports to monitor the Department’s program administration, including its compliance with program requirements and ability to prevent and detect fraud, and to evaluate the program’s success. Further, the Department is unable to resubmit reports because the federal agency does not allow grantees to revise reports after the reporting period has closed.2,4 Finally, the Department is at risk that this finding applies to other federal programs it administers. Cause—As described in finding 2024-103, the Department did not develop, document, or implement internal control procedures to monitor compliance with the programs’ reporting requirements. Specifically, the Department did not perform an independent review and approval of reports prior to submitting them to the federal grantor to ensure the reported expenditures were accurate, agreed to the County’s records, and contained only allowable expenses. Department management reported that it had performed independent reviews and approvals of all reports but did not maintain documentation because the Department did not have a formal policy requiring a documented review and approval of its reports. Further, the Department did not have a process to track when each report was required to be completed and did not verify that reports were submitted by the designated due dates. Additionally, Department management reported that it had significant staff turnover between fiscal years, resulting in current staff being unaware of how past reports were prepared and what supporting documentation was used. Further, Department management reported that there were many challenges in using the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s portal, including the inability to make changes to submitted reports after the reporting period ended. Criteria—Federal agency guidance requires the Department to report accurate and complete information for the ERA and SLFRF quarterly reports.3,4 Also, federal regulation and Department retention policies require the Department to retain all records relating to a federal award for a period of 3 years from the date of its submission of the final expenditure report (2 CFR §200.334).5 Further, federal regulation requires establishing and maintaining effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that federal programs are being managed in compliance with all applicable laws, regulations, and award terms (2 CFR §200.303). Recommendations to the Department— 1. Prepare and retain detailed documentation, such as system reports, screenshots, or queries, to ensure accurate and complete program information is reported to the federal agency for each federal program. 2. Follow its retention policies and procedures and federal regulation requirements to retain all records relating to a federal award for a period of 3 years from the date of its submission of the final expenditure report. 3. Develop, document, and implement policies and procedures and train responsible employees to monitor compliance with the program’s reporting requirements, including processes to: a. Reconcile expenditure amounts reported to the County’s accounting records and investigate and resolve any differences prior to submitting the reports to the federal agencies. b. Perform and document an independent review and approval of all federal program reports before submitting them to the federal agency to ensure reports are accurate, agree to County records, and contain only allowable expenditures. c. Create a tracking mechanism to ensure reports are completed and submitted by the designated due dates. 4. Work with the U.S. Department of the Treasury to determine if it will require and allow the Department to adjust and resubmit previously submitted reports to correct detected errors and/or missing information. The County’s corrective action plan at the end of this report includes the views and planned corrective action of its responsible officials. We are not required to audit and have not audited these responses and planned corrective actions and therefore provide no assurances as to their accuracy. 1 The Department did not retain documentation for the following ERA quarterly reports: ERA2 - Q2 2023, Q3 2023, Q4 2023, and Q1 2024. Further, the Department did not retain documentation for the following SLFRF quarterly Project and Expenditure Reports: April 1, 2023 through June 30, 2023; July 1, 2023 through September 30, 2023; October 1, 2023 through December 31, 2023; and January 1, 2024 through March 31, 2024. 2 On April 2, 2024, the U.S. Department of the Treasury updated its ERA2 Treasury Portal User Guide, which indicates that the grantee can only resubmit a report before the reporting deadline. (U.S. Department of the Treasury. [2024, April]. Emergency Rental Assistance Program [ERA2] Treasury Portal User Guide, Version 3.0. Retrieved 4/7/2025 from https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/136/ERA2-Portal-Users-Guide.pdf). 3 The U.S. Department of the Treasury requires the Department to submit accurate and complete ERA quarterly reports of cumulative programmatic and financial information covering the period from receipt of awards to the end of the current quarterly reporting period (U.S. Department of the Treasury. [2024, September]. Emergency Rental Assistance Program [ERA2] Reporting Guidance, Version 3.0. Retrieved 4/7/2025 from https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/136/ERA2-Reporting-Guidance.pdf). 4 On April 7, 2023, the U.S. Department of the Treasury updated its Project and Expenditure Report User Guide State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, which indicates that the grantee can only resubmit a report before the reporting deadline. Further, the U.S. Department of the Treasury requires the Department to submit accurate and complete SLFRF quarterly project and expenditure reports that provide information on projects funded, expenditures, and contracts and subawards greater than or equal to $50,000, and other information required from recipients. (U.S. Department of the Treasury. [2023, April]. Project and Expenditure Report User Guide State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, Version 2. Retrieved 4/7/2025 from https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/136/ERA2-Reporting-Guidance.pdf). 5 Pima County’s record retention schedule requires federal grant records to be retained after quarterly, annual, or final expenditure reports are submitted and approved or after funding agency requirements are met, whichever is longer (Pima County. [2023, December]. Pima County Record Retention Schedule).
Assistance Listings number and name: 21.023 COVID-19 - Emergency Rental Assistance Program Award numbers and years: 1505-0270, May 5, 2021 through September 30, 2025; 23*019, May 5, 2021 through September 30, 2025; 23*056, May 5, 2021 through September 30, 2025; 23*064, May 5, 2021 through September 30, 2025 Assistance Listings number and name: 21.027 COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Award numbers and years: 1505-0271, March 3, 2021 through December 31, 2024; 19418, May 31, 2023 through September 30, 2023 Federal agency: U.S. Department of the Treasury Compliance requirement: Reporting Questioned costs: Not applicable Condition—Contrary to federal regulation and guidance, for information it reported to the federal agency for its Emergency Rental Assistance (ERA) Program and Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF) programs, the County’s Grants Management and Innovation Department (Department) did not retain documentation to support 8 reports we tested and did not always report accurate information or required elements. Specifically, we found that the Department: • Did not retain documentation for 4 ERA and 4 SLFRF reports—The Department did not retain documentation, like system reports, screenshots, or queries, to support the information it reported for 4 ERA and 4 SLFRF quarterly reports we tested.1 • Did not accurately report information for 4 SLFRF reports—The Department incorrectly reported information for the 4 SLFRF quarterly reports specified in the previous bullet. Specifically, the Department understated cumulative program expenditures by nearly $14.6 million, or 10% of total cumulative program expenditures, as of June 30, 2024. • Failed to report required elements for 2 ERA reports—The Department did not report all key performance and financial reporting data points required by the federal agency in 2 of 4 ERA quarterly reports we tested, thereby limiting the amount of data we could audit. Specifically, the Department did not submit: o Demographic information for the ERA2 – Q2 2023 report due August 16, 2023. o Any performance or financial reporting data for the ERA2 – Q3 2023 report due November 15, 2023. As of June 30, 2024, the County spent $77.6 million, or 99% of the nearly $77.7 million of ERA program monies, and $147.1 million, or 72% of the over $203.4 million of SLFRF program monies, advanced in fiscal year 2021. Effect—The Department’s failure to report required elements and accurate program information in its reports and to retain associated documentation for audit purposes resulted in us being unable to determine whether the reports were complete and accurate. Also, it results in the federal agency being unable to rely on the reports to monitor the Department’s program administration, including its compliance with program requirements and ability to prevent and detect fraud, and to evaluate the program’s success. Further, the Department is unable to resubmit reports because the federal agency does not allow grantees to revise reports after the reporting period has closed.2,4 Finally, the Department is at risk that this finding applies to other federal programs it administers. Cause—As described in finding 2024-103, the Department did not develop, document, or implement internal control procedures to monitor compliance with the programs’ reporting requirements. Specifically, the Department did not perform an independent review and approval of reports prior to submitting them to the federal grantor to ensure the reported expenditures were accurate, agreed to the County’s records, and contained only allowable expenses. Department management reported that it had performed independent reviews and approvals of all reports but did not maintain documentation because the Department did not have a formal policy requiring a documented review and approval of its reports. Further, the Department did not have a process to track when each report was required to be completed and did not verify that reports were submitted by the designated due dates. Additionally, Department management reported that it had significant staff turnover between fiscal years, resulting in current staff being unaware of how past reports were prepared and what supporting documentation was used. Further, Department management reported that there were many challenges in using the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s portal, including the inability to make changes to submitted reports after the reporting period ended. Criteria—Federal agency guidance requires the Department to report accurate and complete information for the ERA and SLFRF quarterly reports.3,4 Also, federal regulation and Department retention policies require the Department to retain all records relating to a federal award for a period of 3 years from the date of its submission of the final expenditure report (2 CFR §200.334).5 Further, federal regulation requires establishing and maintaining effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that federal programs are being managed in compliance with all applicable laws, regulations, and award terms (2 CFR §200.303). Recommendations to the Department— 1. Prepare and retain detailed documentation, such as system reports, screenshots, or queries, to ensure accurate and complete program information is reported to the federal agency for each federal program. 2. Follow its retention policies and procedures and federal regulation requirements to retain all records relating to a federal award for a period of 3 years from the date of its submission of the final expenditure report. 3. Develop, document, and implement policies and procedures and train responsible employees to monitor compliance with the program’s reporting requirements, including processes to: a. Reconcile expenditure amounts reported to the County’s accounting records and investigate and resolve any differences prior to submitting the reports to the federal agencies. b. Perform and document an independent review and approval of all federal program reports before submitting them to the federal agency to ensure reports are accurate, agree to County records, and contain only allowable expenditures. c. Create a tracking mechanism to ensure reports are completed and submitted by the designated due dates. 4. Work with the U.S. Department of the Treasury to determine if it will require and allow the Department to adjust and resubmit previously submitted reports to correct detected errors and/or missing information. The County’s corrective action plan at the end of this report includes the views and planned corrective action of its responsible officials. We are not required to audit and have not audited these responses and planned corrective actions and therefore provide no assurances as to their accuracy. 1 The Department did not retain documentation for the following ERA quarterly reports: ERA2 - Q2 2023, Q3 2023, Q4 2023, and Q1 2024. Further, the Department did not retain documentation for the following SLFRF quarterly Project and Expenditure Reports: April 1, 2023 through June 30, 2023; July 1, 2023 through September 30, 2023; October 1, 2023 through December 31, 2023; and January 1, 2024 through March 31, 2024. 2 On April 2, 2024, the U.S. Department of the Treasury updated its ERA2 Treasury Portal User Guide, which indicates that the grantee can only resubmit a report before the reporting deadline. (U.S. Department of the Treasury. [2024, April]. Emergency Rental Assistance Program [ERA2] Treasury Portal User Guide, Version 3.0. Retrieved 4/7/2025 from https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/136/ERA2-Portal-Users-Guide.pdf). 3 The U.S. Department of the Treasury requires the Department to submit accurate and complete ERA quarterly reports of cumulative programmatic and financial information covering the period from receipt of awards to the end of the current quarterly reporting period (U.S. Department of the Treasury. [2024, September]. Emergency Rental Assistance Program [ERA2] Reporting Guidance, Version 3.0. Retrieved 4/7/2025 from https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/136/ERA2-Reporting-Guidance.pdf). 4 On April 7, 2023, the U.S. Department of the Treasury updated its Project and Expenditure Report User Guide State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, which indicates that the grantee can only resubmit a report before the reporting deadline. Further, the U.S. Department of the Treasury requires the Department to submit accurate and complete SLFRF quarterly project and expenditure reports that provide information on projects funded, expenditures, and contracts and subawards greater than or equal to $50,000, and other information required from recipients. (U.S. Department of the Treasury. [2023, April]. Project and Expenditure Report User Guide State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, Version 2. Retrieved 4/7/2025 from https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/136/ERA2-Reporting-Guidance.pdf). 5 Pima County’s record retention schedule requires federal grant records to be retained after quarterly, annual, or final expenditure reports are submitted and approved or after funding agency requirements are met, whichever is longer (Pima County. [2023, December]. Pima County Record Retention Schedule).
Assistance Listings number and name: 21.023 COVID-19 - Emergency Rental Assistance Program Award numbers and years: 1505-0270, May 5, 2021 through September 30, 2025; 23*019, May 5, 2021 through September 30, 2025; 23*056, May 5, 2021 through September 30, 2025; 23*064, May 5, 2021 through September 30, 2025 Assistance Listings number and name: 21.027 COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Award numbers and years: 1505-0271, March 3, 2021 through December 31, 2024; 19418, May 31, 2023 through September 30, 2023 Federal agency: U.S. Department of the Treasury Compliance requirement: Reporting Questioned costs: Not applicable Condition—Contrary to federal regulation and guidance, for information it reported to the federal agency for its Emergency Rental Assistance (ERA) Program and Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF) programs, the County’s Grants Management and Innovation Department (Department) did not retain documentation to support 8 reports we tested and did not always report accurate information or required elements. Specifically, we found that the Department: • Did not retain documentation for 4 ERA and 4 SLFRF reports—The Department did not retain documentation, like system reports, screenshots, or queries, to support the information it reported for 4 ERA and 4 SLFRF quarterly reports we tested.1 • Did not accurately report information for 4 SLFRF reports—The Department incorrectly reported information for the 4 SLFRF quarterly reports specified in the previous bullet. Specifically, the Department understated cumulative program expenditures by nearly $14.6 million, or 10% of total cumulative program expenditures, as of June 30, 2024. • Failed to report required elements for 2 ERA reports—The Department did not report all key performance and financial reporting data points required by the federal agency in 2 of 4 ERA quarterly reports we tested, thereby limiting the amount of data we could audit. Specifically, the Department did not submit: o Demographic information for the ERA2 – Q2 2023 report due August 16, 2023. o Any performance or financial reporting data for the ERA2 – Q3 2023 report due November 15, 2023. As of June 30, 2024, the County spent $77.6 million, or 99% of the nearly $77.7 million of ERA program monies, and $147.1 million, or 72% of the over $203.4 million of SLFRF program monies, advanced in fiscal year 2021. Effect—The Department’s failure to report required elements and accurate program information in its reports and to retain associated documentation for audit purposes resulted in us being unable to determine whether the reports were complete and accurate. Also, it results in the federal agency being unable to rely on the reports to monitor the Department’s program administration, including its compliance with program requirements and ability to prevent and detect fraud, and to evaluate the program’s success. Further, the Department is unable to resubmit reports because the federal agency does not allow grantees to revise reports after the reporting period has closed.2,4 Finally, the Department is at risk that this finding applies to other federal programs it administers. Cause—As described in finding 2024-103, the Department did not develop, document, or implement internal control procedures to monitor compliance with the programs’ reporting requirements. Specifically, the Department did not perform an independent review and approval of reports prior to submitting them to the federal grantor to ensure the reported expenditures were accurate, agreed to the County’s records, and contained only allowable expenses. Department management reported that it had performed independent reviews and approvals of all reports but did not maintain documentation because the Department did not have a formal policy requiring a documented review and approval of its reports. Further, the Department did not have a process to track when each report was required to be completed and did not verify that reports were submitted by the designated due dates. Additionally, Department management reported that it had significant staff turnover between fiscal years, resulting in current staff being unaware of how past reports were prepared and what supporting documentation was used. Further, Department management reported that there were many challenges in using the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s portal, including the inability to make changes to submitted reports after the reporting period ended. Criteria—Federal agency guidance requires the Department to report accurate and complete information for the ERA and SLFRF quarterly reports.3,4 Also, federal regulation and Department retention policies require the Department to retain all records relating to a federal award for a period of 3 years from the date of its submission of the final expenditure report (2 CFR §200.334).5 Further, federal regulation requires establishing and maintaining effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that federal programs are being managed in compliance with all applicable laws, regulations, and award terms (2 CFR §200.303). Recommendations to the Department— 1. Prepare and retain detailed documentation, such as system reports, screenshots, or queries, to ensure accurate and complete program information is reported to the federal agency for each federal program. 2. Follow its retention policies and procedures and federal regulation requirements to retain all records relating to a federal award for a period of 3 years from the date of its submission of the final expenditure report. 3. Develop, document, and implement policies and procedures and train responsible employees to monitor compliance with the program’s reporting requirements, including processes to: a. Reconcile expenditure amounts reported to the County’s accounting records and investigate and resolve any differences prior to submitting the reports to the federal agencies. b. Perform and document an independent review and approval of all federal program reports before submitting them to the federal agency to ensure reports are accurate, agree to County records, and contain only allowable expenditures. c. Create a tracking mechanism to ensure reports are completed and submitted by the designated due dates. 4. Work with the U.S. Department of the Treasury to determine if it will require and allow the Department to adjust and resubmit previously submitted reports to correct detected errors and/or missing information. The County’s corrective action plan at the end of this report includes the views and planned corrective action of its responsible officials. We are not required to audit and have not audited these responses and planned corrective actions and therefore provide no assurances as to their accuracy. 1 The Department did not retain documentation for the following ERA quarterly reports: ERA2 - Q2 2023, Q3 2023, Q4 2023, and Q1 2024. Further, the Department did not retain documentation for the following SLFRF quarterly Project and Expenditure Reports: April 1, 2023 through June 30, 2023; July 1, 2023 through September 30, 2023; October 1, 2023 through December 31, 2023; and January 1, 2024 through March 31, 2024. 2 On April 2, 2024, the U.S. Department of the Treasury updated its ERA2 Treasury Portal User Guide, which indicates that the grantee can only resubmit a report before the reporting deadline. (U.S. Department of the Treasury. [2024, April]. Emergency Rental Assistance Program [ERA2] Treasury Portal User Guide, Version 3.0. Retrieved 4/7/2025 from https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/136/ERA2-Portal-Users-Guide.pdf). 3 The U.S. Department of the Treasury requires the Department to submit accurate and complete ERA quarterly reports of cumulative programmatic and financial information covering the period from receipt of awards to the end of the current quarterly reporting period (U.S. Department of the Treasury. [2024, September]. Emergency Rental Assistance Program [ERA2] Reporting Guidance, Version 3.0. Retrieved 4/7/2025 from https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/136/ERA2-Reporting-Guidance.pdf). 4 On April 7, 2023, the U.S. Department of the Treasury updated its Project and Expenditure Report User Guide State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, which indicates that the grantee can only resubmit a report before the reporting deadline. Further, the U.S. Department of the Treasury requires the Department to submit accurate and complete SLFRF quarterly project and expenditure reports that provide information on projects funded, expenditures, and contracts and subawards greater than or equal to $50,000, and other information required from recipients. (U.S. Department of the Treasury. [2023, April]. Project and Expenditure Report User Guide State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, Version 2. Retrieved 4/7/2025 from https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/136/ERA2-Reporting-Guidance.pdf). 5 Pima County’s record retention schedule requires federal grant records to be retained after quarterly, annual, or final expenditure reports are submitted and approved or after funding agency requirements are met, whichever is longer (Pima County. [2023, December]. Pima County Record Retention Schedule).
Assistance Listings number and name: 21.023 COVID-19 - Emergency Rental Assistance Program Award numbers and years: 1505-0270, May 5, 2021 through September 30, 2025; 23*019, May 5, 2021 through September 30, 2025; 23*056, May 5, 2021 through September 30, 2025; 23*064, May 5, 2021 through September 30, 2025 Assistance Listings number and name: 21.027 COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Award numbers and years: 1505-0271, March 3, 2021 through December 31, 2024; 19418, May 31, 2023 through September 30, 2023 Federal agency: U.S. Department of the Treasury Compliance requirement: Reporting Questioned costs: Not applicable Condition—Contrary to federal regulation and guidance, for information it reported to the federal agency for its Emergency Rental Assistance (ERA) Program and Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF) programs, the County’s Grants Management and Innovation Department (Department) did not retain documentation to support 8 reports we tested and did not always report accurate information or required elements. Specifically, we found that the Department: • Did not retain documentation for 4 ERA and 4 SLFRF reports—The Department did not retain documentation, like system reports, screenshots, or queries, to support the information it reported for 4 ERA and 4 SLFRF quarterly reports we tested.1 • Did not accurately report information for 4 SLFRF reports—The Department incorrectly reported information for the 4 SLFRF quarterly reports specified in the previous bullet. Specifically, the Department understated cumulative program expenditures by nearly $14.6 million, or 10% of total cumulative program expenditures, as of June 30, 2024. • Failed to report required elements for 2 ERA reports—The Department did not report all key performance and financial reporting data points required by the federal agency in 2 of 4 ERA quarterly reports we tested, thereby limiting the amount of data we could audit. Specifically, the Department did not submit: o Demographic information for the ERA2 – Q2 2023 report due August 16, 2023. o Any performance or financial reporting data for the ERA2 – Q3 2023 report due November 15, 2023. As of June 30, 2024, the County spent $77.6 million, or 99% of the nearly $77.7 million of ERA program monies, and $147.1 million, or 72% of the over $203.4 million of SLFRF program monies, advanced in fiscal year 2021. Effect—The Department’s failure to report required elements and accurate program information in its reports and to retain associated documentation for audit purposes resulted in us being unable to determine whether the reports were complete and accurate. Also, it results in the federal agency being unable to rely on the reports to monitor the Department’s program administration, including its compliance with program requirements and ability to prevent and detect fraud, and to evaluate the program’s success. Further, the Department is unable to resubmit reports because the federal agency does not allow grantees to revise reports after the reporting period has closed.2,4 Finally, the Department is at risk that this finding applies to other federal programs it administers. Cause—As described in finding 2024-103, the Department did not develop, document, or implement internal control procedures to monitor compliance with the programs’ reporting requirements. Specifically, the Department did not perform an independent review and approval of reports prior to submitting them to the federal grantor to ensure the reported expenditures were accurate, agreed to the County’s records, and contained only allowable expenses. Department management reported that it had performed independent reviews and approvals of all reports but did not maintain documentation because the Department did not have a formal policy requiring a documented review and approval of its reports. Further, the Department did not have a process to track when each report was required to be completed and did not verify that reports were submitted by the designated due dates. Additionally, Department management reported that it had significant staff turnover between fiscal years, resulting in current staff being unaware of how past reports were prepared and what supporting documentation was used. Further, Department management reported that there were many challenges in using the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s portal, including the inability to make changes to submitted reports after the reporting period ended. Criteria—Federal agency guidance requires the Department to report accurate and complete information for the ERA and SLFRF quarterly reports.3,4 Also, federal regulation and Department retention policies require the Department to retain all records relating to a federal award for a period of 3 years from the date of its submission of the final expenditure report (2 CFR §200.334).5 Further, federal regulation requires establishing and maintaining effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that federal programs are being managed in compliance with all applicable laws, regulations, and award terms (2 CFR §200.303). Recommendations to the Department— 1. Prepare and retain detailed documentation, such as system reports, screenshots, or queries, to ensure accurate and complete program information is reported to the federal agency for each federal program. 2. Follow its retention policies and procedures and federal regulation requirements to retain all records relating to a federal award for a period of 3 years from the date of its submission of the final expenditure report. 3. Develop, document, and implement policies and procedures and train responsible employees to monitor compliance with the program’s reporting requirements, including processes to: a. Reconcile expenditure amounts reported to the County’s accounting records and investigate and resolve any differences prior to submitting the reports to the federal agencies. b. Perform and document an independent review and approval of all federal program reports before submitting them to the federal agency to ensure reports are accurate, agree to County records, and contain only allowable expenditures. c. Create a tracking mechanism to ensure reports are completed and submitted by the designated due dates. 4. Work with the U.S. Department of the Treasury to determine if it will require and allow the Department to adjust and resubmit previously submitted reports to correct detected errors and/or missing information. The County’s corrective action plan at the end of this report includes the views and planned corrective action of its responsible officials. We are not required to audit and have not audited these responses and planned corrective actions and therefore provide no assurances as to their accuracy. 1 The Department did not retain documentation for the following ERA quarterly reports: ERA2 - Q2 2023, Q3 2023, Q4 2023, and Q1 2024. Further, the Department did not retain documentation for the following SLFRF quarterly Project and Expenditure Reports: April 1, 2023 through June 30, 2023; July 1, 2023 through September 30, 2023; October 1, 2023 through December 31, 2023; and January 1, 2024 through March 31, 2024. 2 On April 2, 2024, the U.S. Department of the Treasury updated its ERA2 Treasury Portal User Guide, which indicates that the grantee can only resubmit a report before the reporting deadline. (U.S. Department of the Treasury. [2024, April]. Emergency Rental Assistance Program [ERA2] Treasury Portal User Guide, Version 3.0. Retrieved 4/7/2025 from https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/136/ERA2-Portal-Users-Guide.pdf). 3 The U.S. Department of the Treasury requires the Department to submit accurate and complete ERA quarterly reports of cumulative programmatic and financial information covering the period from receipt of awards to the end of the current quarterly reporting period (U.S. Department of the Treasury. [2024, September]. Emergency Rental Assistance Program [ERA2] Reporting Guidance, Version 3.0. Retrieved 4/7/2025 from https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/136/ERA2-Reporting-Guidance.pdf). 4 On April 7, 2023, the U.S. Department of the Treasury updated its Project and Expenditure Report User Guide State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, which indicates that the grantee can only resubmit a report before the reporting deadline. Further, the U.S. Department of the Treasury requires the Department to submit accurate and complete SLFRF quarterly project and expenditure reports that provide information on projects funded, expenditures, and contracts and subawards greater than or equal to $50,000, and other information required from recipients. (U.S. Department of the Treasury. [2023, April]. Project and Expenditure Report User Guide State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, Version 2. Retrieved 4/7/2025 from https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/136/ERA2-Reporting-Guidance.pdf). 5 Pima County’s record retention schedule requires federal grant records to be retained after quarterly, annual, or final expenditure reports are submitted and approved or after funding agency requirements are met, whichever is longer (Pima County. [2023, December]. Pima County Record Retention Schedule).
Assistance Listings number and name: 21.023 COVID-19 - Emergency Rental Assistance Program Award numbers and years: 1505-0270, May 5, 2021 through September 30, 2025; 23*019, May 5, 2021 through September 30, 2025; 23*056, May 5, 2021 through September 30, 2025; 23*064, May 5, 2021 through September 30, 2025 Assistance Listings number and name: 21.027 COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Award numbers and years: 1505-0271, March 3, 2021 through December 31, 2024; 19418, May 31, 2023 through September 30, 2023 Federal agency: U.S. Department of the Treasury Compliance requirement: Reporting Questioned costs: Not applicable Condition—Contrary to federal regulation and guidance, for information it reported to the federal agency for its Emergency Rental Assistance (ERA) Program and Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF) programs, the County’s Grants Management and Innovation Department (Department) did not retain documentation to support 8 reports we tested and did not always report accurate information or required elements. Specifically, we found that the Department: • Did not retain documentation for 4 ERA and 4 SLFRF reports—The Department did not retain documentation, like system reports, screenshots, or queries, to support the information it reported for 4 ERA and 4 SLFRF quarterly reports we tested.1 • Did not accurately report information for 4 SLFRF reports—The Department incorrectly reported information for the 4 SLFRF quarterly reports specified in the previous bullet. Specifically, the Department understated cumulative program expenditures by nearly $14.6 million, or 10% of total cumulative program expenditures, as of June 30, 2024. • Failed to report required elements for 2 ERA reports—The Department did not report all key performance and financial reporting data points required by the federal agency in 2 of 4 ERA quarterly reports we tested, thereby limiting the amount of data we could audit. Specifically, the Department did not submit: o Demographic information for the ERA2 – Q2 2023 report due August 16, 2023. o Any performance or financial reporting data for the ERA2 – Q3 2023 report due November 15, 2023. As of June 30, 2024, the County spent $77.6 million, or 99% of the nearly $77.7 million of ERA program monies, and $147.1 million, or 72% of the over $203.4 million of SLFRF program monies, advanced in fiscal year 2021. Effect—The Department’s failure to report required elements and accurate program information in its reports and to retain associated documentation for audit purposes resulted in us being unable to determine whether the reports were complete and accurate. Also, it results in the federal agency being unable to rely on the reports to monitor the Department’s program administration, including its compliance with program requirements and ability to prevent and detect fraud, and to evaluate the program’s success. Further, the Department is unable to resubmit reports because the federal agency does not allow grantees to revise reports after the reporting period has closed.2,4 Finally, the Department is at risk that this finding applies to other federal programs it administers. Cause—As described in finding 2024-103, the Department did not develop, document, or implement internal control procedures to monitor compliance with the programs’ reporting requirements. Specifically, the Department did not perform an independent review and approval of reports prior to submitting them to the federal grantor to ensure the reported expenditures were accurate, agreed to the County’s records, and contained only allowable expenses. Department management reported that it had performed independent reviews and approvals of all reports but did not maintain documentation because the Department did not have a formal policy requiring a documented review and approval of its reports. Further, the Department did not have a process to track when each report was required to be completed and did not verify that reports were submitted by the designated due dates. Additionally, Department management reported that it had significant staff turnover between fiscal years, resulting in current staff being unaware of how past reports were prepared and what supporting documentation was used. Further, Department management reported that there were many challenges in using the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s portal, including the inability to make changes to submitted reports after the reporting period ended. Criteria—Federal agency guidance requires the Department to report accurate and complete information for the ERA and SLFRF quarterly reports.3,4 Also, federal regulation and Department retention policies require the Department to retain all records relating to a federal award for a period of 3 years from the date of its submission of the final expenditure report (2 CFR §200.334).5 Further, federal regulation requires establishing and maintaining effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that federal programs are being managed in compliance with all applicable laws, regulations, and award terms (2 CFR §200.303). Recommendations to the Department— 1. Prepare and retain detailed documentation, such as system reports, screenshots, or queries, to ensure accurate and complete program information is reported to the federal agency for each federal program. 2. Follow its retention policies and procedures and federal regulation requirements to retain all records relating to a federal award for a period of 3 years from the date of its submission of the final expenditure report. 3. Develop, document, and implement policies and procedures and train responsible employees to monitor compliance with the program’s reporting requirements, including processes to: a. Reconcile expenditure amounts reported to the County’s accounting records and investigate and resolve any differences prior to submitting the reports to the federal agencies. b. Perform and document an independent review and approval of all federal program reports before submitting them to the federal agency to ensure reports are accurate, agree to County records, and contain only allowable expenditures. c. Create a tracking mechanism to ensure reports are completed and submitted by the designated due dates. 4. Work with the U.S. Department of the Treasury to determine if it will require and allow the Department to adjust and resubmit previously submitted reports to correct detected errors and/or missing information. The County’s corrective action plan at the end of this report includes the views and planned corrective action of its responsible officials. We are not required to audit and have not audited these responses and planned corrective actions and therefore provide no assurances as to their accuracy. 1 The Department did not retain documentation for the following ERA quarterly reports: ERA2 - Q2 2023, Q3 2023, Q4 2023, and Q1 2024. Further, the Department did not retain documentation for the following SLFRF quarterly Project and Expenditure Reports: April 1, 2023 through June 30, 2023; July 1, 2023 through September 30, 2023; October 1, 2023 through December 31, 2023; and January 1, 2024 through March 31, 2024. 2 On April 2, 2024, the U.S. Department of the Treasury updated its ERA2 Treasury Portal User Guide, which indicates that the grantee can only resubmit a report before the reporting deadline. (U.S. Department of the Treasury. [2024, April]. Emergency Rental Assistance Program [ERA2] Treasury Portal User Guide, Version 3.0. Retrieved 4/7/2025 from https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/136/ERA2-Portal-Users-Guide.pdf). 3 The U.S. Department of the Treasury requires the Department to submit accurate and complete ERA quarterly reports of cumulative programmatic and financial information covering the period from receipt of awards to the end of the current quarterly reporting period (U.S. Department of the Treasury. [2024, September]. Emergency Rental Assistance Program [ERA2] Reporting Guidance, Version 3.0. Retrieved 4/7/2025 from https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/136/ERA2-Reporting-Guidance.pdf). 4 On April 7, 2023, the U.S. Department of the Treasury updated its Project and Expenditure Report User Guide State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, which indicates that the grantee can only resubmit a report before the reporting deadline. Further, the U.S. Department of the Treasury requires the Department to submit accurate and complete SLFRF quarterly project and expenditure reports that provide information on projects funded, expenditures, and contracts and subawards greater than or equal to $50,000, and other information required from recipients. (U.S. Department of the Treasury. [2023, April]. Project and Expenditure Report User Guide State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, Version 2. Retrieved 4/7/2025 from https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/136/ERA2-Reporting-Guidance.pdf). 5 Pima County’s record retention schedule requires federal grant records to be retained after quarterly, annual, or final expenditure reports are submitted and approved or after funding agency requirements are met, whichever is longer (Pima County. [2023, December]. Pima County Record Retention Schedule).
Federal Program: ALN 14.218 - Community Development Block Grants/Entitlement Grants Category: Compliance/Internal control Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Criteria: As part of the standards for documentation of personnel expenses (2 CFR §200.430 (i)), it is required that charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed and be supported by a system of internal control that ensures accuracy, allowability, and proper allocation. According to the record retention requirements (2 CFR §200.334), recipients and subrecipients are required to retain all records for three years from the date of submission of their final financial report, or from the date of submission of the respective reports if the award is renewed quarterly or annually. The federal regulations require employers to verify the identity and employment authorization of individuals hired for employment in the United States using the Employment Eligibility Verification form (I-9). The EEOC's Enforcement Guidance on Harassment in the Workplace recommends that employers periodically update their sexual harassment policies and conduct regular training to ensure compliance with federal antidiscrimination laws. 2 CFR §200.112 requires that Federal agencies establish conflict of interest policies for Federal awards. Recipients or subrecipients must disclose in writing any potential conflict of interest to the Federal agency or pass-through entity in accordance with the established Federal agency policies. Regular updates to conflict-of-interest certifications are recommended to ensure ongoing compliance. As part of the BGCPR recruitment, selection, and hiring process, it is required that the employee file includes a copy of form I-9 and a signed copy of the job description. The protocol for disclosure of conflicts of interest establishes that as part of the recruitment procedures and on an annual basis, all candidates for the board of directors, management teams, employees, and, in certain cases, investors and donors are required to complete a conflict-of-interest disclosure form. Condition: There were significant gaps in the documentation of employee files, which pose potential noncompliance risks. Cause: Lack of monitoring procedures to ascertain compliance with federal, local and internal requirements.Effect or potential effect: Failure to maintain proper documentation can result in non-compliance with federal regulations and organizational policies, potentially leading to legal penalties and ethical breaches. Questioned costs: Not determined Context: The allowable activities/cost test revealed the following: • One (1) of fifty (50) employees’ files tested did not have a copy of the Employment eligibility verification form (I- 9) • Nineteen (19) of fifty (50) employees’ files tested did not have a copy of the signed job description. • Forty-nine (49) of fifty (50) employees’ files tested did not have evidence of certification regarding compliance with conflicts of interest protocol. • Twenty-nine (29) of fifty (50) employees’ files tested did not have evidence of annual training of sexual harassment. Recommendation: We recommended that BGCPR implement comprehensive record retention policies and ensure strict adherence to established procedures. Additionally, BGCPR should establish monitoring procedures to ascertain the completeness of employee files in compliance with regulatory requirements. Views of responsible officials: BGCPR acknowledges that document retention policy does not comply with the requirements set forth in Title 2 of the Code of Federal Regulations (2 CFR §200.334). This regulation requires that all financial records, supporting documents, statistical data, and other files related to federal grants be retained for a minimum period of three years from the date of submission of the final financial report. In the absence of this policy, BGCPR exposes itself to risks of non-compliance and possible sanctions during federal audits or reviews. Therefore, it is considered a priority to develop and implement a document retention policy that ensures compliance with this regulation and strengthens institutional transparency and accountability. As a corrective measure, BGCPR will take the following actions and will anticipate completing on June 30, 2025: a. Establish clear guidelines for the creation, storage, access, updating, and disposal of records. b. Define retention periods in accordance with legal requirements. c. Develop periodic monitoring procedures to verify record completeness and compliance. d. Implement scheduled internal reviews and standardized checklists. e. Assign specific responsibilities to Human Resources personnel for policy enforcement.
Criteria or Specific Requirement: In accordance with the grant agreements and applicable federal record retention standards (2 CFR 200.334), recipients of federal funds must maintain all records pertinent to the grant—including required progress and financial reports—for a minimum of three years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report. Condition and Context: Solvista Health did not retain certain key documents required to be retained under federal regulation and specific grant agreements. Specifically, Solvista Health was unable to provide quarterly reports, expenditure reimbursement packets submitted to the grantors, project expenditure reports, or other grant-related records necessary to demonstrate compliance with federal reporting and record retention standards under the federal programs. Questioned Costs: N/A Cause: Solvista Health did not implement adequate internal controls to ensure that submitted reports and expenditure reimbursement packets were archived and retained in accordance with grant and federal requirements. Effect: The absence of these records could impede the ability to verify proper grant administration and verify submitted expenditures were allowable costs incurred in accordance with the federal award agreement, which could impact future funding eligibility. It also represents a potential noncompliance with federal grant requirements. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Not a repeat finding. Recommendation: Solvista Health should strengthen its document retention policies and processes and implement internal controls to ensure that all required grant reports are consistently reviewed, approved, submitted, retained and retrievable for the required retention period.
Criteria or Specific Requirement: In accordance with the grant agreements and applicable federal record retention standards (2 CFR 200.334), recipients of federal funds must maintain all records pertinent to the grant—including required progress and financial reports—for a minimum of three years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report. Condition and Context: Solvista Health did not retain certain key documents required to be retained under federal regulation and specific grant agreements. Specifically, Solvista Health was unable to provide quarterly reports, expenditure reimbursement packets submitted to the grantors, project expenditure reports, or other grant-related records necessary to demonstrate compliance with federal reporting and record retention standards under the federal programs. Questioned Costs: N/A Cause: Solvista Health did not implement adequate internal controls to ensure that submitted reports and expenditure reimbursement packets were archived and retained in accordance with grant and federal requirements. Effect: The absence of these records could impede the ability to verify proper grant administration and verify submitted expenditures were allowable costs incurred in accordance with the federal award agreement, which could impact future funding eligibility. It also represents a potential noncompliance with federal grant requirements. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Not a repeat finding. Recommendation: Solvista Health should strengthen its document retention policies and processes and implement internal controls to ensure that all required grant reports are consistently reviewed, approved, submitted, retained and retrievable for the required retention period.
Criteria or Specific Requirement: In accordance with the grant agreements and applicable federal record retention standards (2 CFR 200.334), recipients of federal funds must maintain all records pertinent to the grant—including required progress and financial reports—for a minimum of three years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report. Condition and Context: Solvista Health did not retain certain key documents required to be retained under federal regulation and specific grant agreements. Specifically, Solvista Health was unable to provide quarterly reports, expenditure reimbursement packets submitted to the grantors, project expenditure reports, or other grant-related records necessary to demonstrate compliance with federal reporting and record retention standards under the federal programs. Questioned Costs: N/A Cause: Solvista Health did not implement adequate internal controls to ensure that submitted reports and expenditure reimbursement packets were archived and retained in accordance with grant and federal requirements. Effect: The absence of these records could impede the ability to verify proper grant administration and verify submitted expenditures were allowable costs incurred in accordance with the federal award agreement, which could impact future funding eligibility. It also represents a potential noncompliance with federal grant requirements. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Not a repeat finding. Recommendation: Solvista Health should strengthen its document retention policies and processes and implement internal controls to ensure that all required grant reports are consistently reviewed, approved, submitted, retained and retrievable for the required retention period.
Block Grants for Prevention and Treatment of Substance Abuse ALN No. 93.959 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Opioid STR ALN No. 93.788 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Criteria or Specific Requirement – Activities Allowed and Unallowed and Cost Principles – 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart E, and Period of Performance – 2 CFR sections 200.308, 200.309, and 200.403(h) Condition – A sample of 80 expenditures were selected from each of the following populations: • ALN No. 93.959 – 1,152 items totaling $1,077,416 • ALN No. 93.788 – 1,222 items totaling $2,537,080 The samples were not, and are not intended to be, statistically valid. Of the 80 expenditures tested from each grant program, the following were determined to lack appropriate supporting documentation to support being charged to grant program: • ALN No. 93.959 - 41 items totaling $25,810, including projected errors over the total population totaling $191,145 • ALN No. 93.788 - 10 items totaling $72,347, including projected errors over the total population totaling $207,012 The Organization did not have adequate supporting documentation demonstrating actual time and effort reporting and lacked evidence of supporting invoices. Cause – The Organization charged budgeted percentages to the grant programs without a system in place to monitor and track that actual time and effort was consistent with budgeted percentages. In addition, the Organization charged expenditures to the grant programs without evidence of supporting invoices. Effect or potential effect – Costs charged to the grant programs could have varied from actual time and effort. In addition, costs charged to the grant could not be supported by actual invoices. Questioned costs – • ALN No. 93.959 - $25,810 • ALN No. 93.788 - $72,347 Context – The Organization did not have a reasonable methodology of allocating costs to these grant programs and did not maintain proper supporting invoices. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable – Repeat finding (see 2023-003) Recommendation – Management should implement policies and procedures that strengthen internal control over compliance in relation to activities allowed and cost principles. The policy and procedure should be designed to ensure that a reasonable allocation methodology is implemented and followed or that time and effort is certified by the employee on a regular basis. In addition, management should implement a document retention policy consistent with 2 CFR 200.334.
Block Grants for Prevention and Treatment of Substance Abuse ALN No. 93.959 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Opioid STR ALN No. 93.788 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Criteria or Specific Requirement – Activities Allowed and Unallowed and Cost Principles – 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart E, and Period of Performance – 2 CFR sections 200.308, 200.309, and 200.403(h) Condition – A sample of 80 expenditures were selected from each of the following populations: • ALN No. 93.959 – 1,152 items totaling $1,077,416 • ALN No. 93.788 – 1,222 items totaling $2,537,080 The samples were not, and are not intended to be, statistically valid. Of the 80 expenditures tested from each grant program, the following were determined to lack appropriate supporting documentation to support being charged to grant program: • ALN No. 93.959 - 41 items totaling $25,810, including projected errors over the total population totaling $191,145 • ALN No. 93.788 - 10 items totaling $72,347, including projected errors over the total population totaling $207,012 The Organization did not have adequate supporting documentation demonstrating actual time and effort reporting and lacked evidence of supporting invoices. Cause – The Organization charged budgeted percentages to the grant programs without a system in place to monitor and track that actual time and effort was consistent with budgeted percentages. In addition, the Organization charged expenditures to the grant programs without evidence of supporting invoices. Effect or potential effect – Costs charged to the grant programs could have varied from actual time and effort. In addition, costs charged to the grant could not be supported by actual invoices. Questioned costs – • ALN No. 93.959 - $25,810 • ALN No. 93.788 - $72,347 Context – The Organization did not have a reasonable methodology of allocating costs to these grant programs and did not maintain proper supporting invoices. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable – Repeat finding (see 2023-003) Recommendation – Management should implement policies and procedures that strengthen internal control over compliance in relation to activities allowed and cost principles. The policy and procedure should be designed to ensure that a reasonable allocation methodology is implemented and followed or that time and effort is certified by the employee on a regular basis. In addition, management should implement a document retention policy consistent with 2 CFR 200.334.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Program Name: Maternal and Child Health Services Block Grant Federal Assistance Listing Number: 93.994 Significant Deficiency, Nonmaterial Noncompliance - Reporting Finding 2024-006 Criteria or Specific Requirement: Per Section 200.303 of the Uniform Grant Guidance, a non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. Per 2 CFR 200.334 the recipient must retain all Federal award records for three years from the date of submission of their final financial report. Condition: During the audit we tested 13 reports and noted the following: a) There were four (4) instances out of 13 reports tested where the submitted reports were unable to be provided, including the date of submission for the reports. b) There were 10 instances out of 13 reports tested where the County was unable to provide evidence the report was reviewed prior to submission. Questioned Costs: None. Effect: By not having the required documentation and underlying support, the County is not able to demonstrate compliance with the applicable requirements. Cause: The County did not have a formal policy to ensure documentation was retained to evidence review and submission of all reports. Recommendation: The County should consider creating a formalized policy to require all submitted reports and underlying data are retained in accordance with the Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding and is implementing procedures to correct this which is further discussed in the Corrective Action Plan. Corrective Action Plan: See Corrective Action Plan prepared by the County.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Federal Program Name: Elementary and Secondary School Relief Fund Assistance Listing Number: 84.425D, 84.425U Federal Award Identification Number and Year: S425D210044 Federal Award Date 1/6/2021, S425U210044 Federal Award Date 12/6/2021 and 3/13/2020 Pass-Through Agency: Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction Pass-Through Number(s): 2022-714508-DPI-ESSERFII-163, 2022-714508-DPI-ESSERFIII-165, 2024-714508-DPI-LETRS-165 Award Period: July 1, 2023 – June 30, 2024 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Other Matter Criteria or Specific Requirement: 2 CFR 200.334 states that "The recipient and subrecipient must retain all Federal award records for three years from the date of submission of their final financial report. For awards that are renewed quarterly or annually, the recipient and subrecipient must retain records for three years from the date of submission of their quarterly or annual financial report, respectively. Records to be retained include but are not limited to, financial records, supporting documentation, and statistical records." Segregation of duties is an internal control intended to prevent or decrease the occurrence of errors or intentional fraud. Segregation of duties ensures that no single employee has control over all phases of a transaction. Condition: The District is required to file an annual report for ESSER. The supporting documentation used to enter the data into the reporting portal was not maintained and there was no review of the data entered into the form by someone other than the preparer. Accordingly, this does not allow for a proper segregation of duties for internal control purposes. Questioned Costs: None. Context: While performing audit procedures, it was noted that there was no review of the report completed by the finance director by someone else. The supporting documents used to complete the report was not retained by the District. Cause: The lack of segregation of duties is due to the limited number of employees and the size of the District’s operations. Effect: Errors or intentional fraud could occur and not be detected timely by other employees in the normal course of their responsibilities as a result of the lack of segregation of duties. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the District review its grant reporting processes and implement internal controls to help ensure that there is adequate segregation of duties in regards to grant reporting including special reports and that all supporting documentation is maintained with the filed copy of the report. Views of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Federal Program Name: Elementary and Secondary School Relief Fund Assistance Listing Number: 84.425D, 84.425U Federal Award Identification Number and Year: S425D210044 Federal Award Date 1/6/2021, S425U210044 Federal Award Date 12/6/2021 and 3/13/2020 Pass-Through Agency: Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction Pass-Through Number(s): 2022-714508-DPI-ESSERFII-163, 2022-714508-DPI-ESSERFIII-165, 2024-714508-DPI-LETRS-165 Award Period: July 1, 2023 – June 30, 2024 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Other Matter Criteria or Specific Requirement: 2 CFR 200.334 states that "The recipient and subrecipient must retain all Federal award records for three years from the date of submission of their final financial report. For awards that are renewed quarterly or annually, the recipient and subrecipient must retain records for three years from the date of submission of their quarterly or annual financial report, respectively. Records to be retained include but are not limited to, financial records, supporting documentation, and statistical records." Segregation of duties is an internal control intended to prevent or decrease the occurrence of errors or intentional fraud. Segregation of duties ensures that no single employee has control over all phases of a transaction. Condition: The District is required to file an annual report for ESSER. The supporting documentation used to enter the data into the reporting portal was not maintained and there was no review of the data entered into the form by someone other than the preparer. Accordingly, this does not allow for a proper segregation of duties for internal control purposes. Questioned Costs: None. Context: While performing audit procedures, it was noted that there was no review of the report completed by the finance director by someone else. The supporting documents used to complete the report was not retained by the District. Cause: The lack of segregation of duties is due to the limited number of employees and the size of the District’s operations. Effect: Errors or intentional fraud could occur and not be detected timely by other employees in the normal course of their responsibilities as a result of the lack of segregation of duties. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the District review its grant reporting processes and implement internal controls to help ensure that there is adequate segregation of duties in regards to grant reporting including special reports and that all supporting documentation is maintained with the filed copy of the report. Views of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Federal Program Name: Elementary and Secondary School Relief Fund Assistance Listing Number: 84.425D, 84.425U Federal Award Identification Number and Year: S425D210044 Federal Award Date 1/6/2021, S425U210044 Federal Award Date 12/6/2021 and 3/13/2020 Pass-Through Agency: Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction Pass-Through Number(s): 2022-714508-DPI-ESSERFII-163, 2022-714508-DPI-ESSERFIII-165, 2024-714508-DPI-LETRS-165 Award Period: July 1, 2023 – June 30, 2024 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Other Matter Criteria or Specific Requirement: 2 CFR 200.334 states that "The recipient and subrecipient must retain all Federal award records for three years from the date of submission of their final financial report. For awards that are renewed quarterly or annually, the recipient and subrecipient must retain records for three years from the date of submission of their quarterly or annual financial report, respectively. Records to be retained include but are not limited to, financial records, supporting documentation, and statistical records." Segregation of duties is an internal control intended to prevent or decrease the occurrence of errors or intentional fraud. Segregation of duties ensures that no single employee has control over all phases of a transaction. Condition: The District is required to file an annual report for ESSER. The supporting documentation used to enter the data into the reporting portal was not maintained and there was no review of the data entered into the form by someone other than the preparer. Accordingly, this does not allow for a proper segregation of duties for internal control purposes. Questioned Costs: None. Context: While performing audit procedures, it was noted that there was no review of the report completed by the finance director by someone else. The supporting documents used to complete the report was not retained by the District. Cause: The lack of segregation of duties is due to the limited number of employees and the size of the District’s operations. Effect: Errors or intentional fraud could occur and not be detected timely by other employees in the normal course of their responsibilities as a result of the lack of segregation of duties. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the District review its grant reporting processes and implement internal controls to help ensure that there is adequate segregation of duties in regards to grant reporting including special reports and that all supporting documentation is maintained with the filed copy of the report. Views of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
FINDING 2024-001 DOCUMENT RETENTION SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY Federal Program: Child Nutrition Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 10.553 & 10.555 Criteria Per 7 CFR 200.334, “Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal entity records pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report or, for Federal awards that are renewed quarterly or annually, from the date of the submission of the quarterly or annual financial report, respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity in the case of a subrecipient.” Condition Two claims for meal reimbursement were selected for testing. The School was unable to provide records of meals served. The School qualified for the Community Eligibility Provision program and all students receive free meals. Meals claimed were below the maximum that could have been claimed had all students obtained school meals each day of the periods under review. No determination of questioned costs could be made. Cause The School did not maintain documentation for each individual claim. Effect Reconciliation of meals served data to individual claims was not possible. Recommendation We recommend the School develop internal controls requiring the maintenance of documentation of meals served for the individual claims submitted for the program. Views of Responsible Officials The School’s Corrective Action Plan is included on page 25.
FINDING 2024-001 DOCUMENT RETENTION SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY Federal Program: Child Nutrition Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 10.553 & 10.555 Criteria Per 7 CFR 200.334, “Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal entity records pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report or, for Federal awards that are renewed quarterly or annually, from the date of the submission of the quarterly or annual financial report, respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity in the case of a subrecipient.” Condition Two claims for meal reimbursement were selected for testing. The School was unable to provide records of meals served. The School qualified for the Community Eligibility Provision program and all students receive free meals. Meals claimed were below the maximum that could have been claimed had all students obtained school meals each day of the periods under review. No determination of questioned costs could be made. Cause The School did not maintain documentation for each individual claim. Effect Reconciliation of meals served data to individual claims was not possible. Recommendation We recommend the School develop internal controls requiring the maintenance of documentation of meals served for the individual claims submitted for the program. Views of Responsible Officials The School’s Corrective Action Plan is included on page 25.
FINDING 2024-003 Subject: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - Reporting Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listings Number: 84.425U Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): S425U210013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2022-002. Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not designed or implemented at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. The School Corporation had not designed, nor implemented, a system of internal controls to ensure that the annual Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER) Data Collection reports (Reports) were complete and accurately submitted. The Reports were prepared by one employee without a documented oversight, review, or approval process in place to prevent, or detect and correct, errors. Due to the lack of effective internal controls, two of the five Reports submitted during the audit period were not supported by the School Corporation's records. The following errors were noted: For the ESSER III, Year 2 report, which covered the period July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022, total expenses reported were understated by $369,741. For the ESSER III, Year 3 report, which covered the period July 1, 2022 to June 30, 2023, total expenses reported for Property - Mandatory Subgrant Funds - Exclusive of Learning Loss Set-Aside were understated by $519,504. Total expenses reported for Supplies - Mandatory Subgrant Funds - Learning Loss Set-Aside were overstated by $11,260. The lack of internal controls was a systemic issue throughout the audit period. Noncompliance was isolated to the ESSER III, Year 2 and Year 3 reports. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 18 JAC-CEN-DEL COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.334 states in part: "Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal entity records pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report or, for Federal awards that are renewed quarterly or annually, from the date of the submission of the quarterly or annual financial report, respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity in the case of a subrecipient. . . ." 2 CFR 200.302(b) states in part: "The financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for the following . . . (2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in §§ 200.328 and 200.329. . . ." 34 CFR 76.722 states: "A State may require a subgrantee to submit reports in a manner and format that assists the State in complying with the requirements under 34 CFR 76.720 and in carrying out other responsibilities under the program." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation. Due to turnover in the position responsible for review, reports were not reviewed to detect errors prior to submission. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, the ESSER III, Year 2 and Year 3 reports were not supported by the School Corporation's records. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 19 JAC-CEN-DEL COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure that all reports are supported by the School Corporation's records. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-003 Subject: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - Reporting Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listings Number: 84.425U Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): S425U210013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2022-002. Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not designed or implemented at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. The School Corporation had not designed, nor implemented, a system of internal controls to ensure that the annual Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER) Data Collection reports (Reports) were complete and accurately submitted. The Reports were prepared by one employee without a documented oversight, review, or approval process in place to prevent, or detect and correct, errors. Due to the lack of effective internal controls, two of the five Reports submitted during the audit period were not supported by the School Corporation's records. The following errors were noted: For the ESSER III, Year 2 report, which covered the period July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022, total expenses reported were understated by $369,741. For the ESSER III, Year 3 report, which covered the period July 1, 2022 to June 30, 2023, total expenses reported for Property - Mandatory Subgrant Funds - Exclusive of Learning Loss Set-Aside were understated by $519,504. Total expenses reported for Supplies - Mandatory Subgrant Funds - Learning Loss Set-Aside were overstated by $11,260. The lack of internal controls was a systemic issue throughout the audit period. Noncompliance was isolated to the ESSER III, Year 2 and Year 3 reports. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 18 JAC-CEN-DEL COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.334 states in part: "Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal entity records pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report or, for Federal awards that are renewed quarterly or annually, from the date of the submission of the quarterly or annual financial report, respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity in the case of a subrecipient. . . ." 2 CFR 200.302(b) states in part: "The financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for the following . . . (2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in §§ 200.328 and 200.329. . . ." 34 CFR 76.722 states: "A State may require a subgrantee to submit reports in a manner and format that assists the State in complying with the requirements under 34 CFR 76.720 and in carrying out other responsibilities under the program." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation. Due to turnover in the position responsible for review, reports were not reviewed to detect errors prior to submission. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, the ESSER III, Year 2 and Year 3 reports were not supported by the School Corporation's records. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 19 JAC-CEN-DEL COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure that all reports are supported by the School Corporation's records. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-005 Subject: Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies - Eligibility Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies Assistance Listings Number: 84.010 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S010A210014, S010A220014, S010A230014 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Eligibility Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2022-003. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 23 MADISON CONSOLIDATED SCHOOLS SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Condition and Context Eligibility for Title I is determined on the Eligible School Summary of the Tile I application. Enrollment and Poverty numbers are automatically pulled from the Indiana Department of Education's (IDOE) Official Pupil Enrollment (PE) count for each school into the Eligible School Summary page of the Tile I application. These counts that are prepopulated should be based on the School Corporation's records as of October of the prior fiscal year. One person compiled and uploaded enrollment data, including poverty status for Real Time (RT) reports, to the IDOE without a documented oversight or review process to ensure that the information was accurate and retained for audit. In addition, there was no review by the School Corporation of the enrollment and poverty counts that were prepopulated into the School Corporation's Title I grant application. The IDOE used the October 1 RT reports for fiscal years 2021-2022 and 2022-2023, as provided by the School Corporation, to determine Eligibility for the 2022-2023 and 2023-2024 grant programs, respectively. The October 1 RT report could not be presented for audit for 2021-2022, which would have been used to pull in enrollment and poverty information for the 2022-2023 grant. As such, we were unable to verify the amounts reported in the grant application. Additionally, the Indiana State Board of Accounts was unable to verify if the correct socioeconomic status was properly reported for any of the students. Enrollment and poverty numbers for any nonpublic schools are manually entered into the application by the School Corporation. The School Corporation had not established an effective process to review the listing of students from the nonpublic schools for enrollment and poverty counts to be entered into the Title I application and to retain this information for audit. We were unable to determine if the enrolled student count and their poverty status in the application was accurate. The lack of internal controls and lack of information submitted for audit was a systemic issue throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.334 states in part: "Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal entity records pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report or, for the Federal awards that are renewed quarterly or annual, from the date of submission of the quarterly or annual financial report, respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity in the case of a subrecipient. . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 24 MADISON CONSOLIDATED SCHOOLS SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation, which would include segregation of key functions, to ensure all records pertinent to the federal award were retained for audit. After a change in software providers, information from the previous provider could not be obtained for audit. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, RT reports and nonpublic school enrollment documentation were not maintained for audit, and, as such, the Indiana State Board of Accounts could not determine if the School Corporation complied with the Eligibility compliance requirement. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure RT reports, and nonpublic school enrollment documentation are maintained for audit. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-005 Subject: Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies - Eligibility Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies Assistance Listings Number: 84.010 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S010A210014, S010A220014, S010A230014 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Eligibility Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2022-003. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 23 MADISON CONSOLIDATED SCHOOLS SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Condition and Context Eligibility for Title I is determined on the Eligible School Summary of the Tile I application. Enrollment and Poverty numbers are automatically pulled from the Indiana Department of Education's (IDOE) Official Pupil Enrollment (PE) count for each school into the Eligible School Summary page of the Tile I application. These counts that are prepopulated should be based on the School Corporation's records as of October of the prior fiscal year. One person compiled and uploaded enrollment data, including poverty status for Real Time (RT) reports, to the IDOE without a documented oversight or review process to ensure that the information was accurate and retained for audit. In addition, there was no review by the School Corporation of the enrollment and poverty counts that were prepopulated into the School Corporation's Title I grant application. The IDOE used the October 1 RT reports for fiscal years 2021-2022 and 2022-2023, as provided by the School Corporation, to determine Eligibility for the 2022-2023 and 2023-2024 grant programs, respectively. The October 1 RT report could not be presented for audit for 2021-2022, which would have been used to pull in enrollment and poverty information for the 2022-2023 grant. As such, we were unable to verify the amounts reported in the grant application. Additionally, the Indiana State Board of Accounts was unable to verify if the correct socioeconomic status was properly reported for any of the students. Enrollment and poverty numbers for any nonpublic schools are manually entered into the application by the School Corporation. The School Corporation had not established an effective process to review the listing of students from the nonpublic schools for enrollment and poverty counts to be entered into the Title I application and to retain this information for audit. We were unable to determine if the enrolled student count and their poverty status in the application was accurate. The lack of internal controls and lack of information submitted for audit was a systemic issue throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.334 states in part: "Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal entity records pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report or, for the Federal awards that are renewed quarterly or annual, from the date of submission of the quarterly or annual financial report, respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity in the case of a subrecipient. . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 24 MADISON CONSOLIDATED SCHOOLS SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation, which would include segregation of key functions, to ensure all records pertinent to the federal award were retained for audit. After a change in software providers, information from the previous provider could not be obtained for audit. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, RT reports and nonpublic school enrollment documentation were not maintained for audit, and, as such, the Indiana State Board of Accounts could not determine if the School Corporation complied with the Eligibility compliance requirement. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure RT reports, and nonpublic school enrollment documentation are maintained for audit. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
Information on the federal program: Subject: Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies – Special Tests and Provisions – Annual Report Card, High School Graduation Rate Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies Assistance Listing Number: 84.010A Federal Award Numbers: S010A210014, S010A220014, S010A230014 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Special Tests and Provisions – Annual Report Card, High School Graduation Rate Audit Findings: Significant Deficiency Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)...." 20 USC 7801(23)(B) states: "To remove a student from a cohort, a school or local educational agency shall require documentation, or obtain information from the State educational agency, to confirm that the student has transferred out, emigrated to another country, or transferred to a prison or juvenile facility, or deceased." 2 CFR 200.333 states in part: "Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal entity records pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report or, for Federal awards that are renewed quarterly or annually, from the date of the submission of the quarterly or annual financial report, respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity in the case of a subrecipient..." 2 CFR 200.334 (Revised Uniform Guidance) states in part: “Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal entity records pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report or, for Federal awards that are renewed quarterly or annually, from the date of the submission of the quarterly or annual financial report, respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity in the case of a subrecipient. . Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Special Tests and Provisions - Annual Report Card, High School Graduation Rate compliance requirement. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Cause: Management had not developed nor implemented a system of internal control that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the Special Tests and Provisions compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system could enable noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Special Tests and Provisions – Annual Report Card, High School Graduation Rate compliance requirement could result in loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Special Tests and Provisions - Annual Report Card, High School Graduation Rate compliance requirement. There was no formal documented review of mobility reports in Skyward during our audit period. Identification as a repeat finding: This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2022-003. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish an effective system of internal control to ensure compliance and comply with the grant agreement and the Special Tests and Provisions - Annual Report Card, High School Graduation Rate compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
Information on the federal program: Subject: Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies – Special Tests and Provisions – Annual Report Card, High School Graduation Rate Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies Assistance Listing Number: 84.010A Federal Award Numbers: S010A210014, S010A220014, S010A230014 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Special Tests and Provisions – Annual Report Card, High School Graduation Rate Audit Findings: Significant Deficiency Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)...." 20 USC 7801(23)(B) states: "To remove a student from a cohort, a school or local educational agency shall require documentation, or obtain information from the State educational agency, to confirm that the student has transferred out, emigrated to another country, or transferred to a prison or juvenile facility, or deceased." 2 CFR 200.333 states in part: "Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal entity records pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report or, for Federal awards that are renewed quarterly or annually, from the date of the submission of the quarterly or annual financial report, respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity in the case of a subrecipient..." 2 CFR 200.334 (Revised Uniform Guidance) states in part: “Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal entity records pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report or, for Federal awards that are renewed quarterly or annually, from the date of the submission of the quarterly or annual financial report, respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity in the case of a subrecipient. . Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Special Tests and Provisions - Annual Report Card, High School Graduation Rate compliance requirement. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Cause: Management had not developed nor implemented a system of internal control that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the Special Tests and Provisions compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system could enable noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Special Tests and Provisions – Annual Report Card, High School Graduation Rate compliance requirement could result in loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Special Tests and Provisions - Annual Report Card, High School Graduation Rate compliance requirement. There was no formal documented review of mobility reports in Skyward during our audit period. Identification as a repeat finding: This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2022-003. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish an effective system of internal control to ensure compliance and comply with the grant agreement and the Special Tests and Provisions - Annual Report Card, High School Graduation Rate compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
Information on the federal program: Subject: Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies – Special Tests and Provisions – Annual Report Card, High School Graduation Rate Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies Assistance Listing Number: 84.010A Federal Award Numbers: S010A210014, S010A220014, S010A230014 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Special Tests and Provisions – Annual Report Card, High School Graduation Rate Audit Findings: Significant Deficiency Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)...." 20 USC 7801(23)(B) states: "To remove a student from a cohort, a school or local educational agency shall require documentation, or obtain information from the State educational agency, to confirm that the student has transferred out, emigrated to another country, or transferred to a prison or juvenile facility, or deceased." 2 CFR 200.333 states in part: "Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal entity records pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report or, for Federal awards that are renewed quarterly or annually, from the date of the submission of the quarterly or annual financial report, respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity in the case of a subrecipient..." 2 CFR 200.334 (Revised Uniform Guidance) states in part: “Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal entity records pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report or, for Federal awards that are renewed quarterly or annually, from the date of the submission of the quarterly or annual financial report, respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity in the case of a subrecipient. . Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Special Tests and Provisions - Annual Report Card, High School Graduation Rate compliance requirement. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Cause: Management had not developed nor implemented a system of internal control that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the Special Tests and Provisions compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system could enable noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Special Tests and Provisions – Annual Report Card, High School Graduation Rate compliance requirement could result in loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Special Tests and Provisions - Annual Report Card, High School Graduation Rate compliance requirement. There was no formal documented review of mobility reports in Skyward during our audit period. Identification as a repeat finding: This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2022-003. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish an effective system of internal control to ensure compliance and comply with the grant agreement and the Special Tests and Provisions - Annual Report Card, High School Graduation Rate compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
FINDING 2024-003 Subject: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - Reporting Federal Agency: Indiana Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stablization Fund Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.425C, 84.425D, 84.425U Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425C200018, S425D200013, S425D210013, S425U210013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context The School Corporation was required to submit annual data reports to the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE) via JotForm, a form/report builder. Data to be submitted included, but was not limited to, current period expenditures, prior period expenditures, and expenditures per activity. During the audit period, the School Corporation submitted one ESSER I report, two ESSER II reports, and two ESSER III reports for a total of five reports. The annual data reports were compiled, prepared, and submitted by the Treasurer without an oversight or review process in place to prevent, or detect and correct, errors. In addition, the five annual data reports were not supported by the School Corporation's records. The documentation used to prepare the reports was not retained by the School Corporation and the ledger activity for the time period of each report did not agree to the data submitted. As such, the Indiana State Board of Accounts could not verify the information submitted to the IDOE was accurate or complete. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.334 states in part: "Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal entity records pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report or, for the Federal awards that are renewed quarterly or annual, from the date of submission of the quarterly or annual financial report, respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity in the case of a subrecipient. . . ." 2 CFR 200.302(b) states in part: "The financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for the following . . . (2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in §§ 200.328 and 200.329. . . ." (3) Records that identify adequately the source and application of funds for federally funded activities. These records must contain information pertaining to Federal awards, authorizations, obligations, unobligated balances, assets, expenditures, income and interest and be supported by source documentation. . . ." 34 CFR 76.722 states: "A State may require a subgrantee to submit reports in a manner and format that assists the State in complying with the requirements under 34 CFR 76.720 and in carrying out other responsibilities under the program." 34 CFR 76.731 states: "A State and a subgrantee shall keep records to show its compliance with program requirements." Cause A proper system of internal controls, which include segregation of key functions, was not established by management of the School Corporation to ensure that reports filed were supported by School Corporation records and had an independent review, for accuracy and completeness, prior to submission. Effect Without a proper system of internal controls in place that operated effectively, the School Corporation submitted reports that were not supported by School Corporation records. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure that documentation utilized in the preparation of the reports is maintained and that there is an independent review of the reports for accuracy and completeness prior to submission. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-003 Subject: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - Reporting Federal Agency: Indiana Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stablization Fund Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.425C, 84.425D, 84.425U Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425C200018, S425D200013, S425D210013, S425U210013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context The School Corporation was required to submit annual data reports to the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE) via JotForm, a form/report builder. Data to be submitted included, but was not limited to, current period expenditures, prior period expenditures, and expenditures per activity. During the audit period, the School Corporation submitted one ESSER I report, two ESSER II reports, and two ESSER III reports for a total of five reports. The annual data reports were compiled, prepared, and submitted by the Treasurer without an oversight or review process in place to prevent, or detect and correct, errors. In addition, the five annual data reports were not supported by the School Corporation's records. The documentation used to prepare the reports was not retained by the School Corporation and the ledger activity for the time period of each report did not agree to the data submitted. As such, the Indiana State Board of Accounts could not verify the information submitted to the IDOE was accurate or complete. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.334 states in part: "Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal entity records pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report or, for the Federal awards that are renewed quarterly or annual, from the date of submission of the quarterly or annual financial report, respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity in the case of a subrecipient. . . ." 2 CFR 200.302(b) states in part: "The financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for the following . . . (2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in §§ 200.328 and 200.329. . . ." (3) Records that identify adequately the source and application of funds for federally funded activities. These records must contain information pertaining to Federal awards, authorizations, obligations, unobligated balances, assets, expenditures, income and interest and be supported by source documentation. . . ." 34 CFR 76.722 states: "A State may require a subgrantee to submit reports in a manner and format that assists the State in complying with the requirements under 34 CFR 76.720 and in carrying out other responsibilities under the program." 34 CFR 76.731 states: "A State and a subgrantee shall keep records to show its compliance with program requirements." Cause A proper system of internal controls, which include segregation of key functions, was not established by management of the School Corporation to ensure that reports filed were supported by School Corporation records and had an independent review, for accuracy and completeness, prior to submission. Effect Without a proper system of internal controls in place that operated effectively, the School Corporation submitted reports that were not supported by School Corporation records. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure that documentation utilized in the preparation of the reports is maintained and that there is an independent review of the reports for accuracy and completeness prior to submission. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-003 Subject: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - Reporting Federal Agency: Indiana Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stablization Fund Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.425C, 84.425D, 84.425U Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425C200018, S425D200013, S425D210013, S425U210013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context The School Corporation was required to submit annual data reports to the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE) via JotForm, a form/report builder. Data to be submitted included, but was not limited to, current period expenditures, prior period expenditures, and expenditures per activity. During the audit period, the School Corporation submitted one ESSER I report, two ESSER II reports, and two ESSER III reports for a total of five reports. The annual data reports were compiled, prepared, and submitted by the Treasurer without an oversight or review process in place to prevent, or detect and correct, errors. In addition, the five annual data reports were not supported by the School Corporation's records. The documentation used to prepare the reports was not retained by the School Corporation and the ledger activity for the time period of each report did not agree to the data submitted. As such, the Indiana State Board of Accounts could not verify the information submitted to the IDOE was accurate or complete. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.334 states in part: "Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal entity records pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report or, for the Federal awards that are renewed quarterly or annual, from the date of submission of the quarterly or annual financial report, respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity in the case of a subrecipient. . . ." 2 CFR 200.302(b) states in part: "The financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for the following . . . (2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in §§ 200.328 and 200.329. . . ." (3) Records that identify adequately the source and application of funds for federally funded activities. These records must contain information pertaining to Federal awards, authorizations, obligations, unobligated balances, assets, expenditures, income and interest and be supported by source documentation. . . ." 34 CFR 76.722 states: "A State may require a subgrantee to submit reports in a manner and format that assists the State in complying with the requirements under 34 CFR 76.720 and in carrying out other responsibilities under the program." 34 CFR 76.731 states: "A State and a subgrantee shall keep records to show its compliance with program requirements." Cause A proper system of internal controls, which include segregation of key functions, was not established by management of the School Corporation to ensure that reports filed were supported by School Corporation records and had an independent review, for accuracy and completeness, prior to submission. Effect Without a proper system of internal controls in place that operated effectively, the School Corporation submitted reports that were not supported by School Corporation records. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure that documentation utilized in the preparation of the reports is maintained and that there is an independent review of the reports for accuracy and completeness prior to submission. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-003 Subject: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - Reporting Federal Agency: Indiana Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stablization Fund Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.425C, 84.425D, 84.425U Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425C200018, S425D200013, S425D210013, S425U210013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context The School Corporation was required to submit annual data reports to the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE) via JotForm, a form/report builder. Data to be submitted included, but was not limited to, current period expenditures, prior period expenditures, and expenditures per activity. During the audit period, the School Corporation submitted one ESSER I report, two ESSER II reports, and two ESSER III reports for a total of five reports. The annual data reports were compiled, prepared, and submitted by the Treasurer without an oversight or review process in place to prevent, or detect and correct, errors. In addition, the five annual data reports were not supported by the School Corporation's records. The documentation used to prepare the reports was not retained by the School Corporation and the ledger activity for the time period of each report did not agree to the data submitted. As such, the Indiana State Board of Accounts could not verify the information submitted to the IDOE was accurate or complete. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.334 states in part: "Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal entity records pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report or, for the Federal awards that are renewed quarterly or annual, from the date of submission of the quarterly or annual financial report, respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity in the case of a subrecipient. . . ." 2 CFR 200.302(b) states in part: "The financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for the following . . . (2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in §§ 200.328 and 200.329. . . ." (3) Records that identify adequately the source and application of funds for federally funded activities. These records must contain information pertaining to Federal awards, authorizations, obligations, unobligated balances, assets, expenditures, income and interest and be supported by source documentation. . . ." 34 CFR 76.722 states: "A State may require a subgrantee to submit reports in a manner and format that assists the State in complying with the requirements under 34 CFR 76.720 and in carrying out other responsibilities under the program." 34 CFR 76.731 states: "A State and a subgrantee shall keep records to show its compliance with program requirements." Cause A proper system of internal controls, which include segregation of key functions, was not established by management of the School Corporation to ensure that reports filed were supported by School Corporation records and had an independent review, for accuracy and completeness, prior to submission. Effect Without a proper system of internal controls in place that operated effectively, the School Corporation submitted reports that were not supported by School Corporation records. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure that documentation utilized in the preparation of the reports is maintained and that there is an independent review of the reports for accuracy and completeness prior to submission. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-003 Subject: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - Reporting Federal Agency: Indiana Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stablization Fund Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.425C, 84.425D, 84.425U Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425C200018, S425D200013, S425D210013, S425U210013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context The School Corporation was required to submit annual data reports to the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE) via JotForm, a form/report builder. Data to be submitted included, but was not limited to, current period expenditures, prior period expenditures, and expenditures per activity. During the audit period, the School Corporation submitted one ESSER I report, two ESSER II reports, and two ESSER III reports for a total of five reports. The annual data reports were compiled, prepared, and submitted by the Treasurer without an oversight or review process in place to prevent, or detect and correct, errors. In addition, the five annual data reports were not supported by the School Corporation's records. The documentation used to prepare the reports was not retained by the School Corporation and the ledger activity for the time period of each report did not agree to the data submitted. As such, the Indiana State Board of Accounts could not verify the information submitted to the IDOE was accurate or complete. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.334 states in part: "Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal entity records pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report or, for the Federal awards that are renewed quarterly or annual, from the date of submission of the quarterly or annual financial report, respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity in the case of a subrecipient. . . ." 2 CFR 200.302(b) states in part: "The financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for the following . . . (2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in §§ 200.328 and 200.329. . . ." (3) Records that identify adequately the source and application of funds for federally funded activities. These records must contain information pertaining to Federal awards, authorizations, obligations, unobligated balances, assets, expenditures, income and interest and be supported by source documentation. . . ." 34 CFR 76.722 states: "A State may require a subgrantee to submit reports in a manner and format that assists the State in complying with the requirements under 34 CFR 76.720 and in carrying out other responsibilities under the program." 34 CFR 76.731 states: "A State and a subgrantee shall keep records to show its compliance with program requirements." Cause A proper system of internal controls, which include segregation of key functions, was not established by management of the School Corporation to ensure that reports filed were supported by School Corporation records and had an independent review, for accuracy and completeness, prior to submission. Effect Without a proper system of internal controls in place that operated effectively, the School Corporation submitted reports that were not supported by School Corporation records. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure that documentation utilized in the preparation of the reports is maintained and that there is an independent review of the reports for accuracy and completeness prior to submission. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-003 Subject: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - Reporting Federal Agency: Indiana Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stablization Fund Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.425C, 84.425D, 84.425U Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425C200018, S425D200013, S425D210013, S425U210013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context The School Corporation was required to submit annual data reports to the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE) via JotForm, a form/report builder. Data to be submitted included, but was not limited to, current period expenditures, prior period expenditures, and expenditures per activity. During the audit period, the School Corporation submitted one ESSER I report, two ESSER II reports, and two ESSER III reports for a total of five reports. The annual data reports were compiled, prepared, and submitted by the Treasurer without an oversight or review process in place to prevent, or detect and correct, errors. In addition, the five annual data reports were not supported by the School Corporation's records. The documentation used to prepare the reports was not retained by the School Corporation and the ledger activity for the time period of each report did not agree to the data submitted. As such, the Indiana State Board of Accounts could not verify the information submitted to the IDOE was accurate or complete. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.334 states in part: "Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal entity records pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report or, for the Federal awards that are renewed quarterly or annual, from the date of submission of the quarterly or annual financial report, respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity in the case of a subrecipient. . . ." 2 CFR 200.302(b) states in part: "The financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for the following . . . (2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in §§ 200.328 and 200.329. . . ." (3) Records that identify adequately the source and application of funds for federally funded activities. These records must contain information pertaining to Federal awards, authorizations, obligations, unobligated balances, assets, expenditures, income and interest and be supported by source documentation. . . ." 34 CFR 76.722 states: "A State may require a subgrantee to submit reports in a manner and format that assists the State in complying with the requirements under 34 CFR 76.720 and in carrying out other responsibilities under the program." 34 CFR 76.731 states: "A State and a subgrantee shall keep records to show its compliance with program requirements." Cause A proper system of internal controls, which include segregation of key functions, was not established by management of the School Corporation to ensure that reports filed were supported by School Corporation records and had an independent review, for accuracy and completeness, prior to submission. Effect Without a proper system of internal controls in place that operated effectively, the School Corporation submitted reports that were not supported by School Corporation records. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure that documentation utilized in the preparation of the reports is maintained and that there is an independent review of the reports for accuracy and completeness prior to submission. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-004 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Special Milk Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.556 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY2023, FY2024 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Activities Allowed and Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context Internal control is generally defined as a process affected by an entity's oversight body, management, and other personnel that provides reasonable assurance that the objectives of an entity will be achieved. With respect to federal awards, nonfederal entities, such as the School Corporation, are required to establish and maintain internal controls over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and terms and conditions of the federal awards. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 22 CANNELTON CITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Internal control is not one event or circumstance, but a dynamic and iterative process. The internal control process is based on fundamental principles that operate as a whole but are best understood when analyzed individually. The fundamental principles are related to five components of internal control which are as follows: Control Environment, Risk Assessment, Control Activities, Information and Communication, and Monitoring. If a component is not effective, or the components are not operating together in an integrated manner, then an internal control system cannot be effective. Deficiencies as noted below were identified in the risk assessment, monitoring, and control activities components. Risk Assessment The School Corporation has not established a formal risk assessment process. There is no documented risk assessment policy, nor is there evidence of periodic risk identification, analysis, or evaluation. Monitoring The School Corporation did not conduct ongoing or periodic reviews to ensure that internal controls were operating as intended and to identify areas for improvement. Furthermore, the School Corporation did not have a process to follow up on corrective actions written as a response to audit findings. Control Activities A sample of 60 claims was selected for testing. Of the 60 claims selected for testing, 43 claims were vendor claims and 17 were payroll claims. Issues were identified with 5 of the vendor claims as noted below: Three claims, totaling $700, were paid based solely upon summary statements from the vendor. The School Corporation was unable to provide additional documentation, such as invoices, to detail what items or services had been purchased. Without adequate supporting documentation, we could not determine if the expenses incurred were for activities and costs allowable per the grant. Two claims, totaling $313, were paid with no supporting documentation. The School Corporation was unable to provide additional documentation, such as invoices, to detail what items or services had been purchased. Without adequate supporting documentation, we could not determine if the expenses incurred were for activities and costs allowable per the grant. The total amount, $1,013, paid without adequate supporting documentation was considered questioned costs. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 23 CANNELTON CITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.334 states in part: "Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal entity records pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report or, for Federal awards that are renewed quarterly or annually, from the date of the submission of the quarterly or annual financial report, respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity in the case of a subrecipient. . . ." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 7 CFR 210.14(a) states in part: ". . . Revenues received by the nonprofit school food service are to be used only for the operation or improvement of such food service, except that, such revenues shall not be used to purchase land or buildings, unless otherwise approved by FNS, or to construct buildings. . . ." 7 CFR 220.7(e)(1)(ii) states in part: ". . . use all revenues received by such food service only for the operation or improvement of that food service . . ." Cause Management of the School Corporation had not taken steps to design and implement policies and procedures to assess risks facing the School Corporation or to establish and operate monitoring activities that monitor the internal control system. Additionally, the School Corporation did not follow proper recordkeeping procedures. The Treasurer paid claims from federal program funds with no support or based on summary statements. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 24 CANNELTON CITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Effect As a result of the five components of internal control not being adequately designed and implemented, the internal control system cannot be effective. Thus, general risks or specific risks from fraud and significant changes could negatively impact the School Corporation, identified internal control deficiencies could continue, and unidentified flaws within the internal control system could exist. Additionally, we could not determine if federal program funds were used to pay only for the operation or improvement of the food service. Furthermore, the lack of detailed documentation was not in compliance with the cost principles. Continued payment with no support or only summary statements could lead to payments for unallowable activities and additional questioned costs. Questioned Costs Questioned costs in the amount of $1,013 were identified as noted in the Condition and Context. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a proper system of internal controls, which would include policies and procedures related to risk assessment and monitoring. Additionally, we recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a proper system of internal controls to ensure expenditures made from federal awards have appropriate supporting documentation to ensure expenditures are allowable per the terms and conditions of the federal award and adhere to the cost principles. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-004 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Special Milk Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.556 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY2023, FY2024 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Activities Allowed and Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context Internal control is generally defined as a process affected by an entity's oversight body, management, and other personnel that provides reasonable assurance that the objectives of an entity will be achieved. With respect to federal awards, nonfederal entities, such as the School Corporation, are required to establish and maintain internal controls over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and terms and conditions of the federal awards. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 22 CANNELTON CITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Internal control is not one event or circumstance, but a dynamic and iterative process. The internal control process is based on fundamental principles that operate as a whole but are best understood when analyzed individually. The fundamental principles are related to five components of internal control which are as follows: Control Environment, Risk Assessment, Control Activities, Information and Communication, and Monitoring. If a component is not effective, or the components are not operating together in an integrated manner, then an internal control system cannot be effective. Deficiencies as noted below were identified in the risk assessment, monitoring, and control activities components. Risk Assessment The School Corporation has not established a formal risk assessment process. There is no documented risk assessment policy, nor is there evidence of periodic risk identification, analysis, or evaluation. Monitoring The School Corporation did not conduct ongoing or periodic reviews to ensure that internal controls were operating as intended and to identify areas for improvement. Furthermore, the School Corporation did not have a process to follow up on corrective actions written as a response to audit findings. Control Activities A sample of 60 claims was selected for testing. Of the 60 claims selected for testing, 43 claims were vendor claims and 17 were payroll claims. Issues were identified with 5 of the vendor claims as noted below: Three claims, totaling $700, were paid based solely upon summary statements from the vendor. The School Corporation was unable to provide additional documentation, such as invoices, to detail what items or services had been purchased. Without adequate supporting documentation, we could not determine if the expenses incurred were for activities and costs allowable per the grant. Two claims, totaling $313, were paid with no supporting documentation. The School Corporation was unable to provide additional documentation, such as invoices, to detail what items or services had been purchased. Without adequate supporting documentation, we could not determine if the expenses incurred were for activities and costs allowable per the grant. The total amount, $1,013, paid without adequate supporting documentation was considered questioned costs. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 23 CANNELTON CITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.334 states in part: "Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal entity records pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report or, for Federal awards that are renewed quarterly or annually, from the date of the submission of the quarterly or annual financial report, respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity in the case of a subrecipient. . . ." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 7 CFR 210.14(a) states in part: ". . . Revenues received by the nonprofit school food service are to be used only for the operation or improvement of such food service, except that, such revenues shall not be used to purchase land or buildings, unless otherwise approved by FNS, or to construct buildings. . . ." 7 CFR 220.7(e)(1)(ii) states in part: ". . . use all revenues received by such food service only for the operation or improvement of that food service . . ." Cause Management of the School Corporation had not taken steps to design and implement policies and procedures to assess risks facing the School Corporation or to establish and operate monitoring activities that monitor the internal control system. Additionally, the School Corporation did not follow proper recordkeeping procedures. The Treasurer paid claims from federal program funds with no support or based on summary statements. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 24 CANNELTON CITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Effect As a result of the five components of internal control not being adequately designed and implemented, the internal control system cannot be effective. Thus, general risks or specific risks from fraud and significant changes could negatively impact the School Corporation, identified internal control deficiencies could continue, and unidentified flaws within the internal control system could exist. Additionally, we could not determine if federal program funds were used to pay only for the operation or improvement of the food service. Furthermore, the lack of detailed documentation was not in compliance with the cost principles. Continued payment with no support or only summary statements could lead to payments for unallowable activities and additional questioned costs. Questioned Costs Questioned costs in the amount of $1,013 were identified as noted in the Condition and Context. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a proper system of internal controls, which would include policies and procedures related to risk assessment and monitoring. Additionally, we recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a proper system of internal controls to ensure expenditures made from federal awards have appropriate supporting documentation to ensure expenditures are allowable per the terms and conditions of the federal award and adhere to the cost principles. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-004 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Special Milk Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.556 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY2023, FY2024 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Activities Allowed and Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context Internal control is generally defined as a process affected by an entity's oversight body, management, and other personnel that provides reasonable assurance that the objectives of an entity will be achieved. With respect to federal awards, nonfederal entities, such as the School Corporation, are required to establish and maintain internal controls over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and terms and conditions of the federal awards. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 22 CANNELTON CITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Internal control is not one event or circumstance, but a dynamic and iterative process. The internal control process is based on fundamental principles that operate as a whole but are best understood when analyzed individually. The fundamental principles are related to five components of internal control which are as follows: Control Environment, Risk Assessment, Control Activities, Information and Communication, and Monitoring. If a component is not effective, or the components are not operating together in an integrated manner, then an internal control system cannot be effective. Deficiencies as noted below were identified in the risk assessment, monitoring, and control activities components. Risk Assessment The School Corporation has not established a formal risk assessment process. There is no documented risk assessment policy, nor is there evidence of periodic risk identification, analysis, or evaluation. Monitoring The School Corporation did not conduct ongoing or periodic reviews to ensure that internal controls were operating as intended and to identify areas for improvement. Furthermore, the School Corporation did not have a process to follow up on corrective actions written as a response to audit findings. Control Activities A sample of 60 claims was selected for testing. Of the 60 claims selected for testing, 43 claims were vendor claims and 17 were payroll claims. Issues were identified with 5 of the vendor claims as noted below: Three claims, totaling $700, were paid based solely upon summary statements from the vendor. The School Corporation was unable to provide additional documentation, such as invoices, to detail what items or services had been purchased. Without adequate supporting documentation, we could not determine if the expenses incurred were for activities and costs allowable per the grant. Two claims, totaling $313, were paid with no supporting documentation. The School Corporation was unable to provide additional documentation, such as invoices, to detail what items or services had been purchased. Without adequate supporting documentation, we could not determine if the expenses incurred were for activities and costs allowable per the grant. The total amount, $1,013, paid without adequate supporting documentation was considered questioned costs. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 23 CANNELTON CITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.334 states in part: "Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal entity records pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report or, for Federal awards that are renewed quarterly or annually, from the date of the submission of the quarterly or annual financial report, respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity in the case of a subrecipient. . . ." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 7 CFR 210.14(a) states in part: ". . . Revenues received by the nonprofit school food service are to be used only for the operation or improvement of such food service, except that, such revenues shall not be used to purchase land or buildings, unless otherwise approved by FNS, or to construct buildings. . . ." 7 CFR 220.7(e)(1)(ii) states in part: ". . . use all revenues received by such food service only for the operation or improvement of that food service . . ." Cause Management of the School Corporation had not taken steps to design and implement policies and procedures to assess risks facing the School Corporation or to establish and operate monitoring activities that monitor the internal control system. Additionally, the School Corporation did not follow proper recordkeeping procedures. The Treasurer paid claims from federal program funds with no support or based on summary statements. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 24 CANNELTON CITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Effect As a result of the five components of internal control not being adequately designed and implemented, the internal control system cannot be effective. Thus, general risks or specific risks from fraud and significant changes could negatively impact the School Corporation, identified internal control deficiencies could continue, and unidentified flaws within the internal control system could exist. Additionally, we could not determine if federal program funds were used to pay only for the operation or improvement of the food service. Furthermore, the lack of detailed documentation was not in compliance with the cost principles. Continued payment with no support or only summary statements could lead to payments for unallowable activities and additional questioned costs. Questioned Costs Questioned costs in the amount of $1,013 were identified as noted in the Condition and Context. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a proper system of internal controls, which would include policies and procedures related to risk assessment and monitoring. Additionally, we recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a proper system of internal controls to ensure expenditures made from federal awards have appropriate supporting documentation to ensure expenditures are allowable per the terms and conditions of the federal award and adhere to the cost principles. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-004 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Special Milk Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.556 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY2023, FY2024 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Activities Allowed and Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context Internal control is generally defined as a process affected by an entity's oversight body, management, and other personnel that provides reasonable assurance that the objectives of an entity will be achieved. With respect to federal awards, nonfederal entities, such as the School Corporation, are required to establish and maintain internal controls over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and terms and conditions of the federal awards. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 22 CANNELTON CITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Internal control is not one event or circumstance, but a dynamic and iterative process. The internal control process is based on fundamental principles that operate as a whole but are best understood when analyzed individually. The fundamental principles are related to five components of internal control which are as follows: Control Environment, Risk Assessment, Control Activities, Information and Communication, and Monitoring. If a component is not effective, or the components are not operating together in an integrated manner, then an internal control system cannot be effective. Deficiencies as noted below were identified in the risk assessment, monitoring, and control activities components. Risk Assessment The School Corporation has not established a formal risk assessment process. There is no documented risk assessment policy, nor is there evidence of periodic risk identification, analysis, or evaluation. Monitoring The School Corporation did not conduct ongoing or periodic reviews to ensure that internal controls were operating as intended and to identify areas for improvement. Furthermore, the School Corporation did not have a process to follow up on corrective actions written as a response to audit findings. Control Activities A sample of 60 claims was selected for testing. Of the 60 claims selected for testing, 43 claims were vendor claims and 17 were payroll claims. Issues were identified with 5 of the vendor claims as noted below: Three claims, totaling $700, were paid based solely upon summary statements from the vendor. The School Corporation was unable to provide additional documentation, such as invoices, to detail what items or services had been purchased. Without adequate supporting documentation, we could not determine if the expenses incurred were for activities and costs allowable per the grant. Two claims, totaling $313, were paid with no supporting documentation. The School Corporation was unable to provide additional documentation, such as invoices, to detail what items or services had been purchased. Without adequate supporting documentation, we could not determine if the expenses incurred were for activities and costs allowable per the grant. The total amount, $1,013, paid without adequate supporting documentation was considered questioned costs. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 23 CANNELTON CITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.334 states in part: "Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal entity records pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report or, for Federal awards that are renewed quarterly or annually, from the date of the submission of the quarterly or annual financial report, respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity in the case of a subrecipient. . . ." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 7 CFR 210.14(a) states in part: ". . . Revenues received by the nonprofit school food service are to be used only for the operation or improvement of such food service, except that, such revenues shall not be used to purchase land or buildings, unless otherwise approved by FNS, or to construct buildings. . . ." 7 CFR 220.7(e)(1)(ii) states in part: ". . . use all revenues received by such food service only for the operation or improvement of that food service . . ." Cause Management of the School Corporation had not taken steps to design and implement policies and procedures to assess risks facing the School Corporation or to establish and operate monitoring activities that monitor the internal control system. Additionally, the School Corporation did not follow proper recordkeeping procedures. The Treasurer paid claims from federal program funds with no support or based on summary statements. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 24 CANNELTON CITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Effect As a result of the five components of internal control not being adequately designed and implemented, the internal control system cannot be effective. Thus, general risks or specific risks from fraud and significant changes could negatively impact the School Corporation, identified internal control deficiencies could continue, and unidentified flaws within the internal control system could exist. Additionally, we could not determine if federal program funds were used to pay only for the operation or improvement of the food service. Furthermore, the lack of detailed documentation was not in compliance with the cost principles. Continued payment with no support or only summary statements could lead to payments for unallowable activities and additional questioned costs. Questioned Costs Questioned costs in the amount of $1,013 were identified as noted in the Condition and Context. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a proper system of internal controls, which would include policies and procedures related to risk assessment and monitoring. Additionally, we recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a proper system of internal controls to ensure expenditures made from federal awards have appropriate supporting documentation to ensure expenditures are allowable per the terms and conditions of the federal award and adhere to the cost principles. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-004 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Special Milk Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.556 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY2023, FY2024 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Activities Allowed and Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context Internal control is generally defined as a process affected by an entity's oversight body, management, and other personnel that provides reasonable assurance that the objectives of an entity will be achieved. With respect to federal awards, nonfederal entities, such as the School Corporation, are required to establish and maintain internal controls over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and terms and conditions of the federal awards. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 22 CANNELTON CITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Internal control is not one event or circumstance, but a dynamic and iterative process. The internal control process is based on fundamental principles that operate as a whole but are best understood when analyzed individually. The fundamental principles are related to five components of internal control which are as follows: Control Environment, Risk Assessment, Control Activities, Information and Communication, and Monitoring. If a component is not effective, or the components are not operating together in an integrated manner, then an internal control system cannot be effective. Deficiencies as noted below were identified in the risk assessment, monitoring, and control activities components. Risk Assessment The School Corporation has not established a formal risk assessment process. There is no documented risk assessment policy, nor is there evidence of periodic risk identification, analysis, or evaluation. Monitoring The School Corporation did not conduct ongoing or periodic reviews to ensure that internal controls were operating as intended and to identify areas for improvement. Furthermore, the School Corporation did not have a process to follow up on corrective actions written as a response to audit findings. Control Activities A sample of 60 claims was selected for testing. Of the 60 claims selected for testing, 43 claims were vendor claims and 17 were payroll claims. Issues were identified with 5 of the vendor claims as noted below: Three claims, totaling $700, were paid based solely upon summary statements from the vendor. The School Corporation was unable to provide additional documentation, such as invoices, to detail what items or services had been purchased. Without adequate supporting documentation, we could not determine if the expenses incurred were for activities and costs allowable per the grant. Two claims, totaling $313, were paid with no supporting documentation. The School Corporation was unable to provide additional documentation, such as invoices, to detail what items or services had been purchased. Without adequate supporting documentation, we could not determine if the expenses incurred were for activities and costs allowable per the grant. The total amount, $1,013, paid without adequate supporting documentation was considered questioned costs. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 23 CANNELTON CITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.334 states in part: "Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal entity records pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report or, for Federal awards that are renewed quarterly or annually, from the date of the submission of the quarterly or annual financial report, respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity in the case of a subrecipient. . . ." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 7 CFR 210.14(a) states in part: ". . . Revenues received by the nonprofit school food service are to be used only for the operation or improvement of such food service, except that, such revenues shall not be used to purchase land or buildings, unless otherwise approved by FNS, or to construct buildings. . . ." 7 CFR 220.7(e)(1)(ii) states in part: ". . . use all revenues received by such food service only for the operation or improvement of that food service . . ." Cause Management of the School Corporation had not taken steps to design and implement policies and procedures to assess risks facing the School Corporation or to establish and operate monitoring activities that monitor the internal control system. Additionally, the School Corporation did not follow proper recordkeeping procedures. The Treasurer paid claims from federal program funds with no support or based on summary statements. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 24 CANNELTON CITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Effect As a result of the five components of internal control not being adequately designed and implemented, the internal control system cannot be effective. Thus, general risks or specific risks from fraud and significant changes could negatively impact the School Corporation, identified internal control deficiencies could continue, and unidentified flaws within the internal control system could exist. Additionally, we could not determine if federal program funds were used to pay only for the operation or improvement of the food service. Furthermore, the lack of detailed documentation was not in compliance with the cost principles. Continued payment with no support or only summary statements could lead to payments for unallowable activities and additional questioned costs. Questioned Costs Questioned costs in the amount of $1,013 were identified as noted in the Condition and Context. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a proper system of internal controls, which would include policies and procedures related to risk assessment and monitoring. Additionally, we recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a proper system of internal controls to ensure expenditures made from federal awards have appropriate supporting documentation to ensure expenditures are allowable per the terms and conditions of the federal award and adhere to the cost principles. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
Significant Deficiency Other Noncompliance Program: Assistance Listing: 10.553/10.555 – Child Nutrition Cluster Assistance Listing 84.010A - Title I Grants To Local Educational Agencies Assistance Listing: 84.027/84.027X/84.173/84.173X – Special Education Cluster (IDEA) Assistance Listing: 84.425D – Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund (ESSER II) Assistance Listing: 84.425U – Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund (ARP ESSER) Repeat Finding: Yes Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 requires that a non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over a federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statues, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. 2 CFR 200.334 requires subrecipients to retain all Federal award records for three years from the date of submission of their final financial report. For awards that are renewed quarterly or annually, the recipient and subrecipient must retain records for three years from the date of submission of their quarterly or annual financial report, respectively. Records to be retained include but are not limited to financial records, supporting documentation, and statistical records. Federal agencies or pass-through entities may not impose any other record retention requirements except records must be retained until all litigation, claims, or audit findings involving the records have been resolved and final action taken if any litigation, claim, or audit is started before the expiration of the three-year period. Condition: As part of our statistically valid random sample of sixty non-payroll disbursements from the District’s grant expenditures from major programs, we observed the following instances where information required to ensure that these expenditures fulfilled requirements of 2 CFR Part 200 as follows was not obtained by the District or was otherwise unavailable for our examination: Sixteen instances where there was no documentation to determine the District obtained the required information to ensure that the vendor was not suspended or debarred. One instance where there was no invoice or credit memo to support the transaction. Numerous instances where an invoice was not included in the paid invoice. These invoices were made available to us for our examination on our fourth request Context/ Perspective: This finding is based on our statistically valid random sample of sixty non-payroll cash disbursements charged to major programs of the District. Effect: Failure to follow the federal and state requirements could affect future eligibility for federal award programs or could result in a loss or misappropriation of public assets. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation: We recommend that the District implement additional internal controls as necessary to ensure that proper records are maintained to adequately document its expenditures charged to federal grant programs. Views of Responsible Officials: The Auditee’s Corrective Action Plan lists the District’s response to the findings.
Significant Deficiency Other Noncompliance Program: Assistance Listing: 10.553/10.555 – Child Nutrition Cluster Assistance Listing 84.010A - Title I Grants To Local Educational Agencies Assistance Listing: 84.027/84.027X/84.173/84.173X – Special Education Cluster (IDEA) Assistance Listing: 84.425D – Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund (ESSER II) Assistance Listing: 84.425U – Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund (ARP ESSER) Repeat Finding: Yes Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 requires that a non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over a federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statues, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. 2 CFR 200.334 requires subrecipients to retain all Federal award records for three years from the date of submission of their final financial report. For awards that are renewed quarterly or annually, the recipient and subrecipient must retain records for three years from the date of submission of their quarterly or annual financial report, respectively. Records to be retained include but are not limited to financial records, supporting documentation, and statistical records. Federal agencies or pass-through entities may not impose any other record retention requirements except records must be retained until all litigation, claims, or audit findings involving the records have been resolved and final action taken if any litigation, claim, or audit is started before the expiration of the three-year period. Condition: As part of our statistically valid random sample of sixty non-payroll disbursements from the District’s grant expenditures from major programs, we observed the following instances where information required to ensure that these expenditures fulfilled requirements of 2 CFR Part 200 as follows was not obtained by the District or was otherwise unavailable for our examination: Sixteen instances where there was no documentation to determine the District obtained the required information to ensure that the vendor was not suspended or debarred. One instance where there was no invoice or credit memo to support the transaction. Numerous instances where an invoice was not included in the paid invoice. These invoices were made available to us for our examination on our fourth request Context/ Perspective: This finding is based on our statistically valid random sample of sixty non-payroll cash disbursements charged to major programs of the District. Effect: Failure to follow the federal and state requirements could affect future eligibility for federal award programs or could result in a loss or misappropriation of public assets. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation: We recommend that the District implement additional internal controls as necessary to ensure that proper records are maintained to adequately document its expenditures charged to federal grant programs. Views of Responsible Officials: The Auditee’s Corrective Action Plan lists the District’s response to the findings.
Significant Deficiency Other Noncompliance Program: Assistance Listing: 10.553/10.555 – Child Nutrition Cluster Assistance Listing 84.010A - Title I Grants To Local Educational Agencies Assistance Listing: 84.027/84.027X/84.173/84.173X – Special Education Cluster (IDEA) Assistance Listing: 84.425D – Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund (ESSER II) Assistance Listing: 84.425U – Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund (ARP ESSER) Repeat Finding: Yes Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 requires that a non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over a federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statues, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. 2 CFR 200.334 requires subrecipients to retain all Federal award records for three years from the date of submission of their final financial report. For awards that are renewed quarterly or annually, the recipient and subrecipient must retain records for three years from the date of submission of their quarterly or annual financial report, respectively. Records to be retained include but are not limited to financial records, supporting documentation, and statistical records. Federal agencies or pass-through entities may not impose any other record retention requirements except records must be retained until all litigation, claims, or audit findings involving the records have been resolved and final action taken if any litigation, claim, or audit is started before the expiration of the three-year period. Condition: As part of our statistically valid random sample of sixty non-payroll disbursements from the District’s grant expenditures from major programs, we observed the following instances where information required to ensure that these expenditures fulfilled requirements of 2 CFR Part 200 as follows was not obtained by the District or was otherwise unavailable for our examination: Sixteen instances where there was no documentation to determine the District obtained the required information to ensure that the vendor was not suspended or debarred. One instance where there was no invoice or credit memo to support the transaction. Numerous instances where an invoice was not included in the paid invoice. These invoices were made available to us for our examination on our fourth request Context/ Perspective: This finding is based on our statistically valid random sample of sixty non-payroll cash disbursements charged to major programs of the District. Effect: Failure to follow the federal and state requirements could affect future eligibility for federal award programs or could result in a loss or misappropriation of public assets. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation: We recommend that the District implement additional internal controls as necessary to ensure that proper records are maintained to adequately document its expenditures charged to federal grant programs. Views of Responsible Officials: The Auditee’s Corrective Action Plan lists the District’s response to the findings.
Significant Deficiency Other Noncompliance Program: Assistance Listing: 10.553/10.555 – Child Nutrition Cluster Assistance Listing 84.010A - Title I Grants To Local Educational Agencies Assistance Listing: 84.027/84.027X/84.173/84.173X – Special Education Cluster (IDEA) Assistance Listing: 84.425D – Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund (ESSER II) Assistance Listing: 84.425U – Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund (ARP ESSER) Repeat Finding: Yes Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 requires that a non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over a federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statues, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. 2 CFR 200.334 requires subrecipients to retain all Federal award records for three years from the date of submission of their final financial report. For awards that are renewed quarterly or annually, the recipient and subrecipient must retain records for three years from the date of submission of their quarterly or annual financial report, respectively. Records to be retained include but are not limited to financial records, supporting documentation, and statistical records. Federal agencies or pass-through entities may not impose any other record retention requirements except records must be retained until all litigation, claims, or audit findings involving the records have been resolved and final action taken if any litigation, claim, or audit is started before the expiration of the three-year period. Condition: As part of our statistically valid random sample of sixty non-payroll disbursements from the District’s grant expenditures from major programs, we observed the following instances where information required to ensure that these expenditures fulfilled requirements of 2 CFR Part 200 as follows was not obtained by the District or was otherwise unavailable for our examination: Sixteen instances where there was no documentation to determine the District obtained the required information to ensure that the vendor was not suspended or debarred. One instance where there was no invoice or credit memo to support the transaction. Numerous instances where an invoice was not included in the paid invoice. These invoices were made available to us for our examination on our fourth request Context/ Perspective: This finding is based on our statistically valid random sample of sixty non-payroll cash disbursements charged to major programs of the District. Effect: Failure to follow the federal and state requirements could affect future eligibility for federal award programs or could result in a loss or misappropriation of public assets. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation: We recommend that the District implement additional internal controls as necessary to ensure that proper records are maintained to adequately document its expenditures charged to federal grant programs. Views of Responsible Officials: The Auditee’s Corrective Action Plan lists the District’s response to the findings.
Significant Deficiency Other Noncompliance Program: Assistance Listing: 10.553/10.555 – Child Nutrition Cluster Assistance Listing 84.010A - Title I Grants To Local Educational Agencies Assistance Listing: 84.027/84.027X/84.173/84.173X – Special Education Cluster (IDEA) Assistance Listing: 84.425D – Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund (ESSER II) Assistance Listing: 84.425U – Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund (ARP ESSER) Repeat Finding: Yes Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 requires that a non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over a federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statues, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. 2 CFR 200.334 requires subrecipients to retain all Federal award records for three years from the date of submission of their final financial report. For awards that are renewed quarterly or annually, the recipient and subrecipient must retain records for three years from the date of submission of their quarterly or annual financial report, respectively. Records to be retained include but are not limited to financial records, supporting documentation, and statistical records. Federal agencies or pass-through entities may not impose any other record retention requirements except records must be retained until all litigation, claims, or audit findings involving the records have been resolved and final action taken if any litigation, claim, or audit is started before the expiration of the three-year period. Condition: As part of our statistically valid random sample of sixty non-payroll disbursements from the District’s grant expenditures from major programs, we observed the following instances where information required to ensure that these expenditures fulfilled requirements of 2 CFR Part 200 as follows was not obtained by the District or was otherwise unavailable for our examination: Sixteen instances where there was no documentation to determine the District obtained the required information to ensure that the vendor was not suspended or debarred. One instance where there was no invoice or credit memo to support the transaction. Numerous instances where an invoice was not included in the paid invoice. These invoices were made available to us for our examination on our fourth request Context/ Perspective: This finding is based on our statistically valid random sample of sixty non-payroll cash disbursements charged to major programs of the District. Effect: Failure to follow the federal and state requirements could affect future eligibility for federal award programs or could result in a loss or misappropriation of public assets. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation: We recommend that the District implement additional internal controls as necessary to ensure that proper records are maintained to adequately document its expenditures charged to federal grant programs. Views of Responsible Officials: The Auditee’s Corrective Action Plan lists the District’s response to the findings.
Significant Deficiency Other Noncompliance Program: Assistance Listing: 10.553/10.555 – Child Nutrition Cluster Assistance Listing 84.010A - Title I Grants To Local Educational Agencies Assistance Listing: 84.027/84.027X/84.173/84.173X – Special Education Cluster (IDEA) Assistance Listing: 84.425D – Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund (ESSER II) Assistance Listing: 84.425U – Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund (ARP ESSER) Repeat Finding: Yes Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 requires that a non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over a federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statues, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. 2 CFR 200.334 requires subrecipients to retain all Federal award records for three years from the date of submission of their final financial report. For awards that are renewed quarterly or annually, the recipient and subrecipient must retain records for three years from the date of submission of their quarterly or annual financial report, respectively. Records to be retained include but are not limited to financial records, supporting documentation, and statistical records. Federal agencies or pass-through entities may not impose any other record retention requirements except records must be retained until all litigation, claims, or audit findings involving the records have been resolved and final action taken if any litigation, claim, or audit is started before the expiration of the three-year period. Condition: As part of our statistically valid random sample of sixty non-payroll disbursements from the District’s grant expenditures from major programs, we observed the following instances where information required to ensure that these expenditures fulfilled requirements of 2 CFR Part 200 as follows was not obtained by the District or was otherwise unavailable for our examination: Sixteen instances where there was no documentation to determine the District obtained the required information to ensure that the vendor was not suspended or debarred. One instance where there was no invoice or credit memo to support the transaction. Numerous instances where an invoice was not included in the paid invoice. These invoices were made available to us for our examination on our fourth request Context/ Perspective: This finding is based on our statistically valid random sample of sixty non-payroll cash disbursements charged to major programs of the District. Effect: Failure to follow the federal and state requirements could affect future eligibility for federal award programs or could result in a loss or misappropriation of public assets. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation: We recommend that the District implement additional internal controls as necessary to ensure that proper records are maintained to adequately document its expenditures charged to federal grant programs. Views of Responsible Officials: The Auditee’s Corrective Action Plan lists the District’s response to the findings.
Significant Deficiency Other Noncompliance Program: Assistance Listing: 10.553/10.555 – Child Nutrition Cluster Assistance Listing 84.010A - Title I Grants To Local Educational Agencies Assistance Listing: 84.027/84.027X/84.173/84.173X – Special Education Cluster (IDEA) Assistance Listing: 84.425D – Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund (ESSER II) Assistance Listing: 84.425U – Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund (ARP ESSER) Repeat Finding: Yes Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 requires that a non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over a federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statues, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. 2 CFR 200.334 requires subrecipients to retain all Federal award records for three years from the date of submission of their final financial report. For awards that are renewed quarterly or annually, the recipient and subrecipient must retain records for three years from the date of submission of their quarterly or annual financial report, respectively. Records to be retained include but are not limited to financial records, supporting documentation, and statistical records. Federal agencies or pass-through entities may not impose any other record retention requirements except records must be retained until all litigation, claims, or audit findings involving the records have been resolved and final action taken if any litigation, claim, or audit is started before the expiration of the three-year period. Condition: As part of our statistically valid random sample of sixty non-payroll disbursements from the District’s grant expenditures from major programs, we observed the following instances where information required to ensure that these expenditures fulfilled requirements of 2 CFR Part 200 as follows was not obtained by the District or was otherwise unavailable for our examination: Sixteen instances where there was no documentation to determine the District obtained the required information to ensure that the vendor was not suspended or debarred. One instance where there was no invoice or credit memo to support the transaction. Numerous instances where an invoice was not included in the paid invoice. These invoices were made available to us for our examination on our fourth request Context/ Perspective: This finding is based on our statistically valid random sample of sixty non-payroll cash disbursements charged to major programs of the District. Effect: Failure to follow the federal and state requirements could affect future eligibility for federal award programs or could result in a loss or misappropriation of public assets. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation: We recommend that the District implement additional internal controls as necessary to ensure that proper records are maintained to adequately document its expenditures charged to federal grant programs. Views of Responsible Officials: The Auditee’s Corrective Action Plan lists the District’s response to the findings.
Significant Deficiency Other Noncompliance Program: Assistance Listing: 10.553/10.555 – Child Nutrition Cluster Assistance Listing 84.010A - Title I Grants To Local Educational Agencies Assistance Listing: 84.027/84.027X/84.173/84.173X – Special Education Cluster (IDEA) Assistance Listing: 84.425D – Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund (ESSER II) Assistance Listing: 84.425U – Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund (ARP ESSER) Repeat Finding: Yes Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 requires that a non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over a federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statues, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. 2 CFR 200.334 requires subrecipients to retain all Federal award records for three years from the date of submission of their final financial report. For awards that are renewed quarterly or annually, the recipient and subrecipient must retain records for three years from the date of submission of their quarterly or annual financial report, respectively. Records to be retained include but are not limited to financial records, supporting documentation, and statistical records. Federal agencies or pass-through entities may not impose any other record retention requirements except records must be retained until all litigation, claims, or audit findings involving the records have been resolved and final action taken if any litigation, claim, or audit is started before the expiration of the three-year period. Condition: As part of our statistically valid random sample of sixty non-payroll disbursements from the District’s grant expenditures from major programs, we observed the following instances where information required to ensure that these expenditures fulfilled requirements of 2 CFR Part 200 as follows was not obtained by the District or was otherwise unavailable for our examination: Sixteen instances where there was no documentation to determine the District obtained the required information to ensure that the vendor was not suspended or debarred. One instance where there was no invoice or credit memo to support the transaction. Numerous instances where an invoice was not included in the paid invoice. These invoices were made available to us for our examination on our fourth request Context/ Perspective: This finding is based on our statistically valid random sample of sixty non-payroll cash disbursements charged to major programs of the District. Effect: Failure to follow the federal and state requirements could affect future eligibility for federal award programs or could result in a loss or misappropriation of public assets. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation: We recommend that the District implement additional internal controls as necessary to ensure that proper records are maintained to adequately document its expenditures charged to federal grant programs. Views of Responsible Officials: The Auditee’s Corrective Action Plan lists the District’s response to the findings.
Significant Deficiency Other Noncompliance Program: Assistance Listing: 10.553/10.555 – Child Nutrition Cluster Assistance Listing 84.010A - Title I Grants To Local Educational Agencies Assistance Listing: 84.027/84.027X/84.173/84.173X – Special Education Cluster (IDEA) Assistance Listing: 84.425D – Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund (ESSER II) Assistance Listing: 84.425U – Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund (ARP ESSER) Repeat Finding: Yes Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 requires that a non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over a federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statues, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. 2 CFR 200.334 requires subrecipients to retain all Federal award records for three years from the date of submission of their final financial report. For awards that are renewed quarterly or annually, the recipient and subrecipient must retain records for three years from the date of submission of their quarterly or annual financial report, respectively. Records to be retained include but are not limited to financial records, supporting documentation, and statistical records. Federal agencies or pass-through entities may not impose any other record retention requirements except records must be retained until all litigation, claims, or audit findings involving the records have been resolved and final action taken if any litigation, claim, or audit is started before the expiration of the three-year period. Condition: As part of our statistically valid random sample of sixty non-payroll disbursements from the District’s grant expenditures from major programs, we observed the following instances where information required to ensure that these expenditures fulfilled requirements of 2 CFR Part 200 as follows was not obtained by the District or was otherwise unavailable for our examination: Sixteen instances where there was no documentation to determine the District obtained the required information to ensure that the vendor was not suspended or debarred. One instance where there was no invoice or credit memo to support the transaction. Numerous instances where an invoice was not included in the paid invoice. These invoices were made available to us for our examination on our fourth request Context/ Perspective: This finding is based on our statistically valid random sample of sixty non-payroll cash disbursements charged to major programs of the District. Effect: Failure to follow the federal and state requirements could affect future eligibility for federal award programs or could result in a loss or misappropriation of public assets. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation: We recommend that the District implement additional internal controls as necessary to ensure that proper records are maintained to adequately document its expenditures charged to federal grant programs. Views of Responsible Officials: The Auditee’s Corrective Action Plan lists the District’s response to the findings.