Cluster: Research and Development Federal Agency: All awards with subrecipients on the SEFA Award Names: All awards with subrecipients on the SEFA Award Numbers: All awards with subrecipients on the SEFA Assistance Listing Title: All awards with subrecipients on the SEFA Assistance Listing Number: All awards with subrecipients on the SEFA Award Year: 2021 - 2022 Pass-through entity: All pass-through entities noted on the SEFA Criteria 2 CFR 200.332 notes that pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: 1. Reviewing financial and performance reports required by the pass-through entity. 2. Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity detected through audits, on-site reviews, and written confirmation from the subrecipient, highlighting the status of actions planned or taken to address Single Audit findings related to the particular subaward. 3. Issuing a management decision for applicable audit findings pertaining only to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity as required by 2 CFR 200.521. Further, Uniform Guidance 2 CFR section 200.331(f) requires that the entity verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F? Audit Requirements when it is expected that the subrecipient?s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in ?200.501 Audit requirements ($750,000). Condition In testing conformity with the compliance requirements for subrecipient monitoring, we selected 7 of the 61 Research and Development subrecipient agreements and the one Opioid STR subrecipient agreement from the detailed listings provided for testing. The total federal funds passed through to subrecipients in FY22 amounted to $3.5 million for the Research & Development Cluster, and $24,500 for the Opioid STR program. For all of our selections, the most recent audit report was not reviewed for purposes of ongoing monitoring as required by the Uniform Guidance. The Health System has a risk assessment form that is completed at contract inception for its subrecipients; however, the risk assessment is not reassessed annually for all subrecipients. The most recent risk assessment form was conducted in 2018 for 2 selections, in 2019 for 2 selections, in 2020 for 2 selections and in 2021 for 2 selections. We further noted that 7 of the 8 risk assessment forms selected for testing did not include explicit documentation detailing the subrecipient audit report review (such as what year was reviewed, what were the results of the review, etc.). Additionally, for one selection, the initial subrecipient risk assessment form was reviewed after the subrecipient award agreement was executed. Cause The Health System?s subrecipient policy does not explicitly state the ongoing monitoring activities that must be conducted or the frequency of required monitoring. For instance, the policy does not outlinemonitoring activities that are required for all subrecipients. Additionally, the risk assessment form does not prescribe the details of the subrecipient audit report review that should be documented. Effect The subrecipients of the Health System may have audit findings pertaining to the Federal award provided from the Health System that may have implications on the compliance of the Health System with Uniform Guidance. Additionally, there may be changes in the risk characteristics of subrecipients that are not identified if risk assessments are not periodically updated. Questioned Costs None noted. Recommendation We recommend that he Health System update its subrecipient monitoring policy to reflect all monitoring compliance requirements of the Uniform Guidance. In particular, the policy should require the receipt of the Uniform Guidance report from all subrecipients that expended $750,000 or more in federal awards during the subrecipient?s fiscal year (or the receipt of the subrecipient?s latest financial statements if not) at contract inception. Any audit findings pertaining to the Federal award should be followed up on by the Health System and a management decision should be issued. This Policy should be distributed and adhered to by all that have a role in the subrecipient monitoring process of the Health System. Management?s Views and Corrective Action Plan Management?s response is included in ?Management?s Views and Corrective Action Plan? included at the end of this report after the summary schedule of status of prior audit findings.
Cluster: Research and Development Federal Agency: All awards with subrecipients on the SEFA Award Names: All awards with subrecipients on the SEFA Award Numbers: All awards with subrecipients on the SEFA Assistance Listing Title: All awards with subrecipients on the SEFA Assistance Listing Number: All awards with subrecipients on the SEFA Award Year: 2021 - 2022 Pass-through entity: All pass-through entities noted on the SEFA Criteria 2 CFR 200.332 notes that pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: 1. Reviewing financial and performance reports required by the pass-through entity. 2. Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity detected through audits, on-site reviews, and written confirmation from the subrecipient, highlighting the status of actions planned or taken to address Single Audit findings related to the particular subaward. 3. Issuing a management decision for applicable audit findings pertaining only to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity as required by 2 CFR 200.521. Further, Uniform Guidance 2 CFR section 200.331(f) requires that the entity verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F? Audit Requirements when it is expected that the subrecipient?s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in ?200.501 Audit requirements ($750,000). Condition In testing conformity with the compliance requirements for subrecipient monitoring, we selected 7 of the 61 Research and Development subrecipient agreements and the one Opioid STR subrecipient agreement from the detailed listings provided for testing. The total federal funds passed through to subrecipients in FY22 amounted to $3.5 million for the Research & Development Cluster, and $24,500 for the Opioid STR program. For all of our selections, the most recent audit report was not reviewed for purposes of ongoing monitoring as required by the Uniform Guidance. The Health System has a risk assessment form that is completed at contract inception for its subrecipients; however, the risk assessment is not reassessed annually for all subrecipients. The most recent risk assessment form was conducted in 2018 for 2 selections, in 2019 for 2 selections, in 2020 for 2 selections and in 2021 for 2 selections. We further noted that 7 of the 8 risk assessment forms selected for testing did not include explicit documentation detailing the subrecipient audit report review (such as what year was reviewed, what were the results of the review, etc.). Additionally, for one selection, the initial subrecipient risk assessment form was reviewed after the subrecipient award agreement was executed. Cause The Health System?s subrecipient policy does not explicitly state the ongoing monitoring activities that must be conducted or the frequency of required monitoring. For instance, the policy does not outlinemonitoring activities that are required for all subrecipients. Additionally, the risk assessment form does not prescribe the details of the subrecipient audit report review that should be documented. Effect The subrecipients of the Health System may have audit findings pertaining to the Federal award provided from the Health System that may have implications on the compliance of the Health System with Uniform Guidance. Additionally, there may be changes in the risk characteristics of subrecipients that are not identified if risk assessments are not periodically updated. Questioned Costs None noted. Recommendation We recommend that he Health System update its subrecipient monitoring policy to reflect all monitoring compliance requirements of the Uniform Guidance. In particular, the policy should require the receipt of the Uniform Guidance report from all subrecipients that expended $750,000 or more in federal awards during the subrecipient?s fiscal year (or the receipt of the subrecipient?s latest financial statements if not) at contract inception. Any audit findings pertaining to the Federal award should be followed up on by the Health System and a management decision should be issued. This Policy should be distributed and adhered to by all that have a role in the subrecipient monitoring process of the Health System. Management?s Views and Corrective Action Plan Management?s response is included in ?Management?s Views and Corrective Action Plan? included at the end of this report after the summary schedule of status of prior audit findings.
Finding 2022-003 ? Failure to Follow Established Subrecipient Monitoring Procedures for the Section 8 Project Based Cluster Program Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (USHUD) Federal Program Name: Section 8 Project-Based Cluster (Section 8) Assistance Listing Numbers: 14.182/14.856 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: IL901 (2022) Award Period: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance, Other Matters CRITERIA OR SPECIFIC REQUIREMENT A pass-through entity must monitor the activities of its subrecipients to ensure subawards are used for authorized purposes, comply with the terms and conditions of the subaward, and achieve performance goals (2 CFR sections 200.332(d) through (f)). Uniform Grant Guidance (2 CFR 200.303) requires nonfederal entities receiving federal awards establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with federal laws, regulations, and program compliance requirements. Effective internal controls should include ensuring on-site review procedures are performed in a timely manner, are designed to monitor fiscal controls, and are performed to ensure compliance with program regulations. CONDITION The Illinois Housing Development Authority (the Authority) did not follow its established policies and procedures for monitoring subrecipients of the Section 8 Project-Based (Section 8) program. The Authority has implemented procedures whereby program staff perform periodic on-site inspections and desk reviews of subrecipients? compliance with regulations applicable to the Section 8 Cluster program. These reviews are formally documented and include the issuance of a report documenting the results of the review to the subrecipient summarizing the procedures performed, results of the procedures, and any findings or performance improvement observations noted. The Authority?s policies require the subrecipient file to be closed within 90 days of the subrecipient being notified of any findings. QUESTIONED COSTS: None CONTEXT During our test work over monitoring review procedures performed for five subrecipients (with expenditures of $3,420,351) of the Section 8 Cluster program, we noted the Authority has not established adequate control activities to ensure its monitoring procedures were followed in communicating the results of its monitoring reviews. We noted the Authority did not send the findings of the Management and Occupancy Reviews (MORs) to two subrecipients (with expenditures totaling $1,799,238) in a timely manner (within 30 days of onsite inspection). Specifically, one MOR was sent 33 days after the onsite inspection and the other MOR was not sent until 41 days after the onsite inspection. CAUSE Authority officials stated staff members responsible for completing the Management and Occupancy Review (MOR) procedure within the 30-day period were not following the prescribed program regulations as documented in both Authority training and staff performance materials. EFFECT Failure to adequately follow on-site monitoring procedures may result in subrecipients not properly administering the Section 8 Cluster program in accordance with statutes, regulations, and the grant agreement. REPEAT FINDING A similar finding was reported in the prior year audit as finding 2021-003. (Finding Code No. 2022-003, 2021-003, 2020-002, 2019-006, 2018-007, 2017-004, 2016-007, 2015-007, 2014-003, 2013-005, 12-05, 11-11) RECOMMENDATION We recommend the Authority ensure monitoring files are completed and closed in accordance with established policies and procedures. AUTHORITY RESPONSE The Authority agrees with the finding and has implemented several new policies and procedures to strengthen controls surrounding the sub monitoring process. All staff are scheduled to complete a full monitoring cycle and have been scheduled for additional trainings. Additionally, weekly team meetings are conducted, and the Authority has updated its written procedures to address the sub monitoring deficiencies. Management and Supervisors will be responsible for weekly quality control tasks that include, reviewing system reports, weekly one on one meetings with the Assistant Director and any staff. The quality control and one on one meetings will be used to reduce and eliminate delayed submissions, closeouts, and notification letters. The Supervisors will run internal reports weekly to identify what inspections are due and ensure they are submitted timely.
Finding 2022-003 ? Failure to Follow Established Subrecipient Monitoring Procedures for the Section 8 Project Based Cluster Program Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (USHUD) Federal Program Name: Section 8 Project-Based Cluster (Section 8) Assistance Listing Numbers: 14.182/14.856 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: IL901 (2022) Award Period: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance, Other Matters CRITERIA OR SPECIFIC REQUIREMENT A pass-through entity must monitor the activities of its subrecipients to ensure subawards are used for authorized purposes, comply with the terms and conditions of the subaward, and achieve performance goals (2 CFR sections 200.332(d) through (f)). Uniform Grant Guidance (2 CFR 200.303) requires nonfederal entities receiving federal awards establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with federal laws, regulations, and program compliance requirements. Effective internal controls should include ensuring on-site review procedures are performed in a timely manner, are designed to monitor fiscal controls, and are performed to ensure compliance with program regulations. CONDITION The Illinois Housing Development Authority (the Authority) did not follow its established policies and procedures for monitoring subrecipients of the Section 8 Project-Based (Section 8) program. The Authority has implemented procedures whereby program staff perform periodic on-site inspections and desk reviews of subrecipients? compliance with regulations applicable to the Section 8 Cluster program. These reviews are formally documented and include the issuance of a report documenting the results of the review to the subrecipient summarizing the procedures performed, results of the procedures, and any findings or performance improvement observations noted. The Authority?s policies require the subrecipient file to be closed within 90 days of the subrecipient being notified of any findings. QUESTIONED COSTS: None CONTEXT During our test work over monitoring review procedures performed for five subrecipients (with expenditures of $3,420,351) of the Section 8 Cluster program, we noted the Authority has not established adequate control activities to ensure its monitoring procedures were followed in communicating the results of its monitoring reviews. We noted the Authority did not send the findings of the Management and Occupancy Reviews (MORs) to two subrecipients (with expenditures totaling $1,799,238) in a timely manner (within 30 days of onsite inspection). Specifically, one MOR was sent 33 days after the onsite inspection and the other MOR was not sent until 41 days after the onsite inspection. CAUSE Authority officials stated staff members responsible for completing the Management and Occupancy Review (MOR) procedure within the 30-day period were not following the prescribed program regulations as documented in both Authority training and staff performance materials. EFFECT Failure to adequately follow on-site monitoring procedures may result in subrecipients not properly administering the Section 8 Cluster program in accordance with statutes, regulations, and the grant agreement. REPEAT FINDING A similar finding was reported in the prior year audit as finding 2021-003. (Finding Code No. 2022-003, 2021-003, 2020-002, 2019-006, 2018-007, 2017-004, 2016-007, 2015-007, 2014-003, 2013-005, 12-05, 11-11) RECOMMENDATION We recommend the Authority ensure monitoring files are completed and closed in accordance with established policies and procedures. AUTHORITY RESPONSE The Authority agrees with the finding and has implemented several new policies and procedures to strengthen controls surrounding the sub monitoring process. All staff are scheduled to complete a full monitoring cycle and have been scheduled for additional trainings. Additionally, weekly team meetings are conducted, and the Authority has updated its written procedures to address the sub monitoring deficiencies. Management and Supervisors will be responsible for weekly quality control tasks that include, reviewing system reports, weekly one on one meetings with the Assistant Director and any staff. The quality control and one on one meetings will be used to reduce and eliminate delayed submissions, closeouts, and notification letters. The Supervisors will run internal reports weekly to identify what inspections are due and ensure they are submitted timely.
2022-001 ? Special Tests and Provisions ? Subrecipient Monitoring Federal Program Information: Department of Education - ALN: - 84.425D/84.425U - Education Stabilization Fund Under the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security Act/ARP ESSER Criteria: The following CFR(s) apply to this finding: 2 CFR 200.332(a) Condition: During audit procedures, it was identified that the Union did not have a compliant subrecipient award. Cause: The Union does not have the necessary internal controls over compliance. Effect: Subrecipient awards are not executed in compliance with the requirement above. Identification of Questioned Costs: None identified. Context: There was one subrecipent. It was determined that the Union did not have a compliant subaward. This is a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: It is recommended that the Union implements internal control processes and procedures to ensure that they are following the criteria above. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan: Client agrees with finding, and the unabridged version of their response can be found in the Corrective Action Plan. Please see the Corrective Action Plan issued by the Essex North Supervisory Union.
2022-001 ? Special Tests and Provisions ? Subrecipient Monitoring Federal Program Information: Department of Education - ALN: - 84.425D/84.425U - Education Stabilization Fund Under the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security Act/ARP ESSER Criteria: The following CFR(s) apply to this finding: 2 CFR 200.332(a) Condition: During audit procedures, it was identified that the Union did not have a compliant subrecipient award. Cause: The Union does not have the necessary internal controls over compliance. Effect: Subrecipient awards are not executed in compliance with the requirement above. Identification of Questioned Costs: None identified. Context: There was one subrecipent. It was determined that the Union did not have a compliant subaward. This is a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: It is recommended that the Union implements internal control processes and procedures to ensure that they are following the criteria above. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan: Client agrees with finding, and the unabridged version of their response can be found in the Corrective Action Plan. Please see the Corrective Action Plan issued by the Essex North Supervisory Union.
2022-001 ? Special Tests and Provisions ? Subrecipient Monitoring Federal Program Information: Department of Education - ALN: - 84.425D/84.425U - Education Stabilization Fund Under the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security Act/ARP ESSER Criteria: The following CFR(s) apply to this finding: 2 CFR 200.332(a) Condition: During audit procedures, it was identified that the Union did not have a compliant subrecipient award. Cause: The Union does not have the necessary internal controls over compliance. Effect: Subrecipient awards are not executed in compliance with the requirement above. Identification of Questioned Costs: None identified. Context: There was one subrecipent. It was determined that the Union did not have a compliant subaward. This is a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: It is recommended that the Union implements internal control processes and procedures to ensure that they are following the criteria above. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan: Client agrees with finding, and the unabridged version of their response can be found in the Corrective Action Plan. Please see the Corrective Action Plan issued by the Essex North Supervisory Union.
Subrecipient Monitoring 2022-007 GENERAL INFORMATION: Grant Title: COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Federal Award Number: Assistance Listing #: 21.027 Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury CONDITION: We noted during our audit that the Randolph County Commission failed to properly monitor subrecipients. Specifically, there was no assurance that the allocated funds sent were expensed by the subrecipients. CRITERIA: 'Proper internal control over federal awards passed to subrecipients requires the establishment and maintenance of an effective system to provide reasonable assurance that the subrecipient is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statues, regulations, and terms and conditions of the federal award. 2 CFR Part 200.332 states, in part, that: "(a) Ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the following information at the time of the subaward and if any of these data elements change, include the changes in subsequent subaward modification. When some of this information is not available, the pass-through entity must provide the best information available to describe the Federal award and subaward. Required information includes:(1) Federal award identification. (i) Subrecipient name (which must match the name associated with its unique entity identifier); (ii) Subrecipient's unique entity identifier; (iii) Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN); (iv) Federal Award Date (see the definition of Federal award date in ? 200.1 of this part) of award to the recipient by the Federal agency; (v) Subaward Period of Performance Start and End Date; (vi) Subaward Budget Period Start and End Date; (vii) Amount of Federal Funds Obligated by this action by the pass-through entity to the subrecipient; (viii) Total Amount of Federal Funds Obligated to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity including the current financial obligation; (ix) Total Amount of the Federal Award committed to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity; (x)Federal award project description, as required to be responsive to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA); (xi)Name of Federal awarding agency, pass-through entity, and contact information for awarding official of the Pass-through entity; (xii)Assistance Listings number and Title; the pass-through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each Federal award and the Assistance Listings Number at time of disbursement; (xiii) Identification of whether the award is R&D; and (xiv)Indirect cost rate for the Federal award (including if the de minimis rate is charged) per ? 200.414. (2) All requirements imposed by the pass-through entity on the subrecipient so that the Federal award is used in accordance with Federal statutes, regulations and the terms and conditions of the Federal award; (3) Any additional requirements that the pass-through entity imposes on the subrecipient in order for the pass-through entity to meet its own responsibility to the Federal awarding agency including identification of any required financial and performance reports; (4) (i) An approved federally recognized indirect cost rate negotiated between the subrecipient and the Federal Government. If no approved rate exists, the pass-through entity must determine the appropriate rate in collaboration with the subrecipient, which is either: (A) The negotiated indirect cost rate between the pass-through entity and the subrecipient; which can be based on a prior negotiated rate between a different PTE and the same subrecipient. If basing the rate on a previously negotiated rate, the pass-through entity is not required to collect information justifying this rate, but may elect to do so; (B) The de minimis indirect cost rate. (4) (ii) The pass-through entity must not require use of a de minimis indirect cost rate if the subrecipient has a Federally approved rate. Subrecipients can elect to use the cost allocation method to account for indirect costs in accordance with ? 200.405(d). (5) A requirement that the subrecipient permit the pass-through entity and auditors to have access to the subrecipient's records and financial statements as necessary for the pass-through entity to meet the requirements of this part; and (6) Appropriate terms and conditions concerning closeout of the subaward. (b) Evaluate each subrecipient's risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring described in paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section, which may include consideration of such factors as: (1) The subrecipient's prior experience with the same or similar subawards; (2) The results of previous audits including whether or not the subrecipient receives a Single Audit in accordance with Subpart F of this part, and the extent to which the same or similar subaward has been audited as a major program; (3) Whether the subrecipient has new personnel or new or substantially changed systems; and (4) The extent and results of Federal awarding agency monitoring (e.g., if the subrecipient also receives Federal awards directly from a Federal awarding agency).... (d) Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: (1) Reviewing financial and performance reports required by the pass-through entity. (2) Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity detected through audits, on-site reviews, and written confirmation from the subrecipient, highlighting the status of actions planned or taken to address Single Audit findings related to the particular subaward. (3) Issuing a management decision for applicable audit findings pertaining only to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity as required by ?200.521. (4) The pass-through entity is responsible for resolving audit findings specifically related to the subaward and not responsible for resolving crosscutting findings. If a subrecipient has a current Single Audit report posted in the Federal Audit Clearinghouse and has not otherwise been excluded from receipt of Federal funding (e.g., has been debarred or suspended), the pass-through entity may rely on the subrecipient's cognizant audit agency or cognizant oversight agency to perform audit follow-up and make management decisions related to cross-cutting findings in accordance with section ?200.513(a)(3)(vii). Such reliance does not eliminate the responsibility of the pass-through entity to issue subawards that conform to agency and award-specific requirements, to manage risk through ongoing subaward monitoring, and to monitor the status of the findings that are specifically related to the subaward.... (f) Verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of this part when it is expected that the subrecipient's Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in ?200.501. (g) Consider whether the results of the subrecipient's audits, on-site reviews, or other monitoring indicate conditions that necessitate adjustments to the pass-through entity's own records." QUESTIONED COSTS: $163,617 CONTEXT: Disbursements totaling $163,617 were made to subrecipients without activities being monitored to ensure expenditures of the subaward were being used for authorized purposes and in accordance with the grant guidelines. CAUSE: The Randolph County Commission did not have procedures in place to ensure subrecipient monitoring requirements were performed. EFFECT: Failure to properly monitor subrecipients increases the likelihood of errors or irregularities not being prevented or detected in a timely manner. Additionally, the risk of unallowable activities and unallowable costs is significantly increased. Management failed to comply with all applicable, material compliance requirements of the grant agreement. REPEAT FINDING: Yes PRIOR YEAR FINDING NUMBER: 2021-002 RECOMMENDATION: The Randolph County Commission is directed to review these regulations and comply with the provisions set forth therein. VIEWS OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS AND PLANNED CORRECTIVE ACTIONS: We will comply and monitor subrecipient spending going forward.
Reference Number: 2022-023 Prior Year Finding: 2021-018 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services State Department Name: Department of Health and Social Services State Division Name: Division of Substance Abuse and Mental Health Federal Program: Opioid STR Assistance Listing Number: 93.788 Award Number and Year: H79TI083305 (9/30/2020 ? 9/29/2022) Compliance Requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Compliance, Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Compliance: 2 CFR ?200.332 - Requirements for Pass-Through Entities states, in part, that all pass-through entities must: (b) Evaluate each subrecipient?s risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring described in paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section, which may include consideration of such factors as: (1) The subrecipient?s prior experience with the same or similar subawards; (2) The results of previous audits including whether or not the subrecipient receives a Single Audit in accordance with Subpart F - Audit Requirements of this part, and the extent to which the same or similar subaward has been audited as a major program; (3) Whether the subrecipient has new personnel or new or substantially changed systems; (4) The extent and results of Federal awarding agency monitoring (e.g., if the subrecipient also receives Federal awards directly from a Federal awarding agency). (d) Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: (1) Reviewing financial and performance reports required by the pass-through entity. (2) Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means. (3) Issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity as required by ? 200.521 Management decision. (e) Depending upon the pass-through entity?s assessment of risk posed by the subrecipient (as described in paragraph (b) of this section), the following monitoring tools may be useful for the pass-through entity to ensure proper accountability and compliance with program requirements and achievement of performance goals: (1) Providing subrecipients with training and technical assistance on program-related matters; (2) Performing on-site reviews of the subrecipient?s program operations; (3) Arranging for agreed-upon-procedures engagements as described in ? 200.425 Audit services. Control: Per 2 CFR Section 200.303(a), a non-Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should comply with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework?, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition: The Division was not able to provide support that it monitored its subrecipients. Context: For 4 of 8 subrecipients selected for testing, the Division was unable to provide support that it conducted during the award monitoring as required by the Division?s policies and procedures. Questioned costs: Undetermined. Cause: The Division did not establish effective internal controls and procedures over subrecipient monitoring. Effect: Not conducting during the award monitoring may result in a failure of the Division to detect that its subrecipients used subawards for unauthorized purposes, managed them in violation of the terms and conditions of the subawards, or that subaward performance goals were not achieved. Recommendation: The Division should review and enhance internal controls and procedures to ensure that proper subrecipient monitoring is conducted in accordance with Federal regulations. Views of responsible officials: The Division has been working to implement corrective action, as this was a prior finding. The implementation timeline overlapped into the current audit period. DSAMH continues to reevaluate its current process and to enhance internal controls and procedures to ensure that all required information is included in all subawards and provided to the subrecipients, that proper subrecipient monitoring is conducted, and that evaluation of independent audits is performed.
Reference Number: 2022-024 Prior Year Finding: 2021-024 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services State Department Name: Department of Health and Social Services State Division Name: Division of Substance Abuse and Mental Health Federal Program: Block Grants for Prevention and Treatment of Substance Abuse, COVID-10 - Block Grants for Prevention and Treatment of Substance Abuse Assistance Listing Number: 93.959 Award Number and Year: B08TI083060 (10/1/2019 ? 9/30/2021), B08TI083488 (10/1/2020 ? 9/30/2022) Compliance Requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance, Material Noncompliance Criteria or specific requirement: Compliance: 2 CFR ?200.332 - Requirements for Pass-Through Entities states in part, that all pass-through entities must: (a) Ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes information at the time of the subaward and if any of these data elements change, include the changes in subsequent subaward modification. When some of this information is not available, the pass-through entity must provide the best information available to describe the Federal award and subaward. (b) Evaluate each subrecipient?s risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring described in paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section, which may include consideration of such factors as: (1) The subrecipient?s prior experience with the same or similar subawards; (2) The results of previous audits including whether or not the subrecipient receives a Single Audit in accordance with Subpart F - Audit Requirements of this part, and the extent to which the same or similar subaward has been audited as a major program; (3) Whether the subrecipient has new personnel or new or substantially changed systems; (4) The extent and results of Federal awarding agency monitoring (e.g., if the subrecipient also receives Federal awards directly from a Federal awarding agency). (d) Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: (1) Reviewing financial and performance reports required by the pass-through entity. (2) Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means. (3) Issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity as required by ? 200.521 Management decision. (e) Depending upon the pass-through entity?s assessment of risk posed by the subrecipient (as described in paragraph (b) of this section), the following monitoring tools may be useful for the pass-through entity to ensure proper accountability and compliance with program requirements and achievement of performance goals: (1) Providing subrecipients with training and technical assistance on program-related matters; and (2) Performing on-site reviews of the subrecipient?s program operations; (3) Arranging for agreed-upon-procedures engagements as described in ? 200.425 Audit services. (f) Verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F - Audit Requirements of this part when it is expected that the subrecipient?s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in ? 200.501 Audit requirements. Control: Per 2 CFR Section 200.303(a), a non-Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should comply with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework?, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition: The Division was not able to provide support that it furnished required information to its subrecipients at the time of subaward, monitored its subrecipients, or ensured its subrecipients were audited as required by 2 CFR Part 200 Subpart F ? Audit Requirements (Subpart F). Context: Exceptions were noted in four of eight subrecipients selected for testing (exceptions listed include multiple exceptions for some subrecipients): ? Four of eight subrecipient agreements were missing the following required information: Subrecipient?s Unique Identifier, Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN), Federal Award Date, Federal Award Project Description, Assistance Listing Number and Title. ? For one of eight subrecipients, the Division was unable to provide support that it ensured the subrecipient was audited as required by Subpart F. The Division could not produce evidence of verification that the subrecipient?s Federal awards expended during the fiscal year were below the threshold set forth in ? 200.501 Audit requirements. ? For four of eight subrecipients, the Division was unable to provide support that it conducted during the award monitoring as required by the Division?s policies and procedures. Questioned costs: Undetermined. Cause: The Division did not establish effective internal controls and procedures over subrecipient monitoring. Effect: Excluding the required federal grant award information at the time of the subaward may cause subrecipients and their auditors to be uninformed about specific program and other regulations that apply to the funds they receive. There is also the potential for subrecipients to have incomplete Schedules of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) in their Single Audit reports, and federal funds may not be properly audited at the subrecipient level in accordance with the Uniform Guidance. Not conducting during the award monitoring may result in a failure of the Division to detect that its subrecipients used subawards for unauthorized purposes, managed them in violation of the terms and conditions of the subawards, or that subaward performance goals were not achieved. Without ensuring subrecipients have obtained audits as required by Subpart F, there is an increased risk that subrecipients could be inappropriately spending and/or inaccurately tracking and reporting federal funds over multiple year periods, and these discrepancies may not be properly monitored, detected, and corrected by Division personnel on a timely basis. Recommendation: The Division should review and enhance internal controls and procedures to ensure that all required information is included in all subawards and provided to the subrecipients, that proper subrecipient monitoring is conducted, and that evaluation of independent audits is performed. Views of responsible officials: The Division has been working to implement corrective action, as this was a prior finding. The implementation timeline overlapped into the current audit period. DSAMH continues to reevaluate its current process and to enhance internal controls and procedures to ensure that all required information is included in all subawards and provided to the subrecipients, also that proper subrecipient monitoring is conducted, and that evaluation of independent audits is performed.
Reference Number: 2022-024 Prior Year Finding: 2021-024 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services State Department Name: Department of Health and Social Services State Division Name: Division of Substance Abuse and Mental Health Federal Program: Block Grants for Prevention and Treatment of Substance Abuse, COVID-10 - Block Grants for Prevention and Treatment of Substance Abuse Assistance Listing Number: 93.959 Award Number and Year: B08TI083060 (10/1/2019 ? 9/30/2021), B08TI083488 (10/1/2020 ? 9/30/2022) Compliance Requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance, Material Noncompliance Criteria or specific requirement: Compliance: 2 CFR ?200.332 - Requirements for Pass-Through Entities states in part, that all pass-through entities must: (a) Ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes information at the time of the subaward and if any of these data elements change, include the changes in subsequent subaward modification. When some of this information is not available, the pass-through entity must provide the best information available to describe the Federal award and subaward. (b) Evaluate each subrecipient?s risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring described in paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section, which may include consideration of such factors as: (1) The subrecipient?s prior experience with the same or similar subawards; (2) The results of previous audits including whether or not the subrecipient receives a Single Audit in accordance with Subpart F - Audit Requirements of this part, and the extent to which the same or similar subaward has been audited as a major program; (3) Whether the subrecipient has new personnel or new or substantially changed systems; (4) The extent and results of Federal awarding agency monitoring (e.g., if the subrecipient also receives Federal awards directly from a Federal awarding agency). (d) Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: (1) Reviewing financial and performance reports required by the pass-through entity. (2) Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means. (3) Issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity as required by ? 200.521 Management decision. (e) Depending upon the pass-through entity?s assessment of risk posed by the subrecipient (as described in paragraph (b) of this section), the following monitoring tools may be useful for the pass-through entity to ensure proper accountability and compliance with program requirements and achievement of performance goals: (1) Providing subrecipients with training and technical assistance on program-related matters; and (2) Performing on-site reviews of the subrecipient?s program operations; (3) Arranging for agreed-upon-procedures engagements as described in ? 200.425 Audit services. (f) Verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F - Audit Requirements of this part when it is expected that the subrecipient?s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in ? 200.501 Audit requirements. Control: Per 2 CFR Section 200.303(a), a non-Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should comply with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework?, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition: The Division was not able to provide support that it furnished required information to its subrecipients at the time of subaward, monitored its subrecipients, or ensured its subrecipients were audited as required by 2 CFR Part 200 Subpart F ? Audit Requirements (Subpart F). Context: Exceptions were noted in four of eight subrecipients selected for testing (exceptions listed include multiple exceptions for some subrecipients): ? Four of eight subrecipient agreements were missing the following required information: Subrecipient?s Unique Identifier, Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN), Federal Award Date, Federal Award Project Description, Assistance Listing Number and Title. ? For one of eight subrecipients, the Division was unable to provide support that it ensured the subrecipient was audited as required by Subpart F. The Division could not produce evidence of verification that the subrecipient?s Federal awards expended during the fiscal year were below the threshold set forth in ? 200.501 Audit requirements. ? For four of eight subrecipients, the Division was unable to provide support that it conducted during the award monitoring as required by the Division?s policies and procedures. Questioned costs: Undetermined. Cause: The Division did not establish effective internal controls and procedures over subrecipient monitoring. Effect: Excluding the required federal grant award information at the time of the subaward may cause subrecipients and their auditors to be uninformed about specific program and other regulations that apply to the funds they receive. There is also the potential for subrecipients to have incomplete Schedules of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) in their Single Audit reports, and federal funds may not be properly audited at the subrecipient level in accordance with the Uniform Guidance. Not conducting during the award monitoring may result in a failure of the Division to detect that its subrecipients used subawards for unauthorized purposes, managed them in violation of the terms and conditions of the subawards, or that subaward performance goals were not achieved. Without ensuring subrecipients have obtained audits as required by Subpart F, there is an increased risk that subrecipients could be inappropriately spending and/or inaccurately tracking and reporting federal funds over multiple year periods, and these discrepancies may not be properly monitored, detected, and corrected by Division personnel on a timely basis. Recommendation: The Division should review and enhance internal controls and procedures to ensure that all required information is included in all subawards and provided to the subrecipients, that proper subrecipient monitoring is conducted, and that evaluation of independent audits is performed. Views of responsible officials: The Division has been working to implement corrective action, as this was a prior finding. The implementation timeline overlapped into the current audit period. DSAMH continues to reevaluate its current process and to enhance internal controls and procedures to ensure that all required information is included in all subawards and provided to the subrecipients, also that proper subrecipient monitoring is conducted, and that evaluation of independent audits is performed.
Reference Number: 2022-029 Prior Year Finding: 2021-027 Federal Agency: U.S. Department Homeland Security State Department Name: Department of Safety and Homeland Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) State Division Name: Delaware Emergency Management Agency (DEMA) Federal Program: Disaster Grants - Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters), COVID-19 ? Disaster Grants ? Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters) Assistance Listing Number: 97.036 Award Number and Year: 4526-DR-DE (2022), 4566-DR-DE (2022), 4627-DR-DE (2022) Compliance Requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance, Material Noncompliance Criteria or specific requirement: Compliance: 2 CFR ?200.332 - Requirements for Pass-Through Entities states, in part, that all pass-through entities must: (a) Ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes information at the time of the subaward and if any of these data elements change, include the changes in subsequent subaward modification. When some of this information is not available, the pass-through entity must provide the best information available to describe the Federal award and subaward. Required information includes: (1) Federal Award Identification (i) Subrecipient name (which must match the name associated with its unique entity identifier); (ii) Subrecipient?s unique entity identifier; (iii) Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN); (iv) Federal Award Date (see the definition of Federal award date in ? 200.1 of this part) of award to the recipient by the Federal agency; (v) Subaward Period of Performance Start and End Date; (vi) Subaward Budget Period Start and End Date; (vii) Amount of Federal Funds Obligated by this action by the pass-through entity to the subrecipient; (viii) Total Amount of Federal Funds Obligated to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity including the current financial obligation; (ix) Total Amount of the Federal Award committed to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity; (x) Federal award project description, as required to be responsive to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA); (xi) Name of Federal awarding agency, pass-through entity, and contact information for awarding official of the Pass-through entity; (xii) Assistance Listings number and Title; the pass-through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each Federal award and the Assistance Listings Number at time of disbursement. (d) Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: (1) Reviewing financial and performance reports required by the pass-through entity. (2) Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means. (3) Issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity as required by ? 200.521 Management decision. (f) Verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F - Audit Requirements of this part when it is expected that the subrecipient?s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in ? 200.501 Audit requirements. Control: Per 2 CFR Section 200.303(a), a non-Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should comply with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework?, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition: DEMA did not furnish all required information to its subrecipients at the time of issuance of the subawards. Further, DEMA was not able to provide support that it monitored the activities of its subrecipients to ensure that the subawards were used for authorized purposes, nor that it ensured its subrecipients were audited as required by 2 CFR Part 200 Subpart F ? Audit Requirements (Subpart F). Context: ? For five of five subrecipients, the following required information was not provided to the subrecipient at the time of award issuance: Federal Award Identification (FAIN), Federal award date, subaward budget period start and end date, Federal award project description as required by FFATA, name of Federal awarding agency, and Assistance Listing number and title. ? For five of five subrecipients, DEMA was unable to provide support that it monitored the activities of its subrecipients during the fiscal year to ensure that the subawards were used for authorized purposes. ? For three of five subrecipients, DEMA was unable to provide support that it ensured the subrecipients were audited as required by Subpart F. DEMA could not produce evidence of verification that the subrecipient?s Federal awards expended during the fiscal year were below the threshold set forth in ? 200.501 Audit requirements. Questioned costs: Undetermined. Cause: DEMA did not establish effective internal controls and procedures over subrecipient monitoring. Effect: Excluding the required federal grant award information at the time of the subaward may cause subrecipients and their auditors to be uninformed about specific program and other regulations that apply to the funds they receive. There is also the potential for subrecipients to have incomplete Schedules of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) in their Single Audit reports, and federal funds may not be properly audited at the subrecipient level in accordance with the Uniform Guidance. Not conducting during the award monitoring may result in a failure to detect that subrecipients used subawards for unauthorized purposes, managed them in violation of the terms and conditions of the subawards, or that subaward performance goals were not achieved. Without ensuring subrecipients have obtained audits as required by Subpart F there is an increased risk that subrecipients could be inappropriately spending and/or inaccurately tracking and reporting federal funds over multiple year periods, and these discrepancies may not be properly monitored, detected, and corrected by agency personnel on a timely basis. Recommendation: DEMA should review and enhance internal controls and procedures to ensure that all required information is included in all subawards, that subrecipients are properly monitored, and that evaluation of independent audits is performed. Views of responsible officials: A contractor has been assigned to develop and implement internal controls to ensure all required information is included in all subawards, that subrecipients are properly monitored, and that evaluation of independent audits is performed. Subaward letters were updated in September 2022 and a monitoring protocol implemented to begin monitoring all subrecipients to date to include an evaluation of independent audits that is documented as part of the monitoring visit.
Reference Number: 2022-029 Prior Year Finding: 2021-027 Federal Agency: U.S. Department Homeland Security State Department Name: Department of Safety and Homeland Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) State Division Name: Delaware Emergency Management Agency (DEMA) Federal Program: Disaster Grants - Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters), COVID-19 ? Disaster Grants ? Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters) Assistance Listing Number: 97.036 Award Number and Year: 4526-DR-DE (2022), 4566-DR-DE (2022), 4627-DR-DE (2022) Compliance Requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance, Material Noncompliance Criteria or specific requirement: Compliance: 2 CFR ?200.332 - Requirements for Pass-Through Entities states, in part, that all pass-through entities must: (a) Ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes information at the time of the subaward and if any of these data elements change, include the changes in subsequent subaward modification. When some of this information is not available, the pass-through entity must provide the best information available to describe the Federal award and subaward. Required information includes: (1) Federal Award Identification (i) Subrecipient name (which must match the name associated with its unique entity identifier); (ii) Subrecipient?s unique entity identifier; (iii) Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN); (iv) Federal Award Date (see the definition of Federal award date in ? 200.1 of this part) of award to the recipient by the Federal agency; (v) Subaward Period of Performance Start and End Date; (vi) Subaward Budget Period Start and End Date; (vii) Amount of Federal Funds Obligated by this action by the pass-through entity to the subrecipient; (viii) Total Amount of Federal Funds Obligated to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity including the current financial obligation; (ix) Total Amount of the Federal Award committed to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity; (x) Federal award project description, as required to be responsive to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA); (xi) Name of Federal awarding agency, pass-through entity, and contact information for awarding official of the Pass-through entity; (xii) Assistance Listings number and Title; the pass-through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each Federal award and the Assistance Listings Number at time of disbursement. (d) Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: (1) Reviewing financial and performance reports required by the pass-through entity. (2) Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means. (3) Issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity as required by ? 200.521 Management decision. (f) Verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F - Audit Requirements of this part when it is expected that the subrecipient?s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in ? 200.501 Audit requirements. Control: Per 2 CFR Section 200.303(a), a non-Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should comply with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework?, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition: DEMA did not furnish all required information to its subrecipients at the time of issuance of the subawards. Further, DEMA was not able to provide support that it monitored the activities of its subrecipients to ensure that the subawards were used for authorized purposes, nor that it ensured its subrecipients were audited as required by 2 CFR Part 200 Subpart F ? Audit Requirements (Subpart F). Context: ? For five of five subrecipients, the following required information was not provided to the subrecipient at the time of award issuance: Federal Award Identification (FAIN), Federal award date, subaward budget period start and end date, Federal award project description as required by FFATA, name of Federal awarding agency, and Assistance Listing number and title. ? For five of five subrecipients, DEMA was unable to provide support that it monitored the activities of its subrecipients during the fiscal year to ensure that the subawards were used for authorized purposes. ? For three of five subrecipients, DEMA was unable to provide support that it ensured the subrecipients were audited as required by Subpart F. DEMA could not produce evidence of verification that the subrecipient?s Federal awards expended during the fiscal year were below the threshold set forth in ? 200.501 Audit requirements. Questioned costs: Undetermined. Cause: DEMA did not establish effective internal controls and procedures over subrecipient monitoring. Effect: Excluding the required federal grant award information at the time of the subaward may cause subrecipients and their auditors to be uninformed about specific program and other regulations that apply to the funds they receive. There is also the potential for subrecipients to have incomplete Schedules of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) in their Single Audit reports, and federal funds may not be properly audited at the subrecipient level in accordance with the Uniform Guidance. Not conducting during the award monitoring may result in a failure to detect that subrecipients used subawards for unauthorized purposes, managed them in violation of the terms and conditions of the subawards, or that subaward performance goals were not achieved. Without ensuring subrecipients have obtained audits as required by Subpart F there is an increased risk that subrecipients could be inappropriately spending and/or inaccurately tracking and reporting federal funds over multiple year periods, and these discrepancies may not be properly monitored, detected, and corrected by agency personnel on a timely basis. Recommendation: DEMA should review and enhance internal controls and procedures to ensure that all required information is included in all subawards, that subrecipients are properly monitored, and that evaluation of independent audits is performed. Views of responsible officials: A contractor has been assigned to develop and implement internal controls to ensure all required information is included in all subawards, that subrecipients are properly monitored, and that evaluation of independent audits is performed. Subaward letters were updated in September 2022 and a monitoring protocol implemented to begin monitoring all subrecipients to date to include an evaluation of independent audits that is documented as part of the monitoring visit.
ELC Program Subrecipient Monitoring 93.323 COVID-19 - Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases (ELC) 93.323 Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases (ELC) See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table within the text As similarly noted in our prior audit report, the DCPH did not adequately monitor ELC program subrecipient contracts during the year ended June 30, 2022. In our review of a sample of 21 contracts requiring financial monitoring reviews, we noted 7 had not been completed as of June 30, 2022. Rule 2 CFR Section 200.332(d) requires pass-through entities to monitor the activities of subrecipients as necessary to ensure the subaward is used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward, and achieves performance goals. Pass-through entities are required to follow up and ensure the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means. The DHSS, as a pass-through entity, disbursed approximately $61.7 million among 219 ELC program subrecipient contracts during the year ended June 30, 2022. In response to the prior finding, the DCPH developed a monitoring plan for ELC program subrecipients, hired additional staff, and began performing monitoring reviews during the year ended June 30, 2022. The monitoring plan requires annual risk assessments, quarterly progress reviews, and completion of a financial monitoring review once during the contract period. If deficiencies are found during the monitoring review, the monitoring plan requires the subrecipient to submit a written corrective action plan to the DCPH, and the DCPH to follow up on the corrective action plan. Due to the delayed implementation of the monitoring plan, the DCPH did not perform all required financial monitoring reviews of ELC program subrecipients during state fiscal year 2022. Our review of a randomly-selected sample of contracts for 21 of the 219 ELC program subrecipient contracts requiring financial monitoring reviews noted risk assessments had been performed for all contracts; however, financial monitoring reviews had not been completed as of June 30, 2022, for 7 contracts (33 percent). We noted financial monitoring reviews were subsequently performed in state fiscal year 2023 for all 7 contracts included in the sample. DCPH officials indicated the delayed implementation of subrecipient monitoring procedures was due to the rapid distribution of COVID-19 funding to subrecipients and insufficient staffing, but they intend to have all reviews completed by March 2024. When subrecipient monitoring procedures are not performed timely and in accordance with monitoring plan requirements, there is increased risk that noncompliance with program requirements will go undetected. Recommendation: The DHSS through the DCPH continue to implement and perform financial monitoring reviews in accordance with the ELC program monitoring plan. Auditee's Response: We agree with the auditor's finding. Our Corrective Action Plan includes our planned actions to address the finding.
ELC Program Subrecipient Monitoring 93.323 COVID-19 - Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases (ELC) 93.323 Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases (ELC) See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table within the text As similarly noted in our prior audit report, the DCPH did not adequately monitor ELC program subrecipient contracts during the year ended June 30, 2022. In our review of a sample of 21 contracts requiring financial monitoring reviews, we noted 7 had not been completed as of June 30, 2022. Rule 2 CFR Section 200.332(d) requires pass-through entities to monitor the activities of subrecipients as necessary to ensure the subaward is used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward, and achieves performance goals. Pass-through entities are required to follow up and ensure the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means. The DHSS, as a pass-through entity, disbursed approximately $61.7 million among 219 ELC program subrecipient contracts during the year ended June 30, 2022. In response to the prior finding, the DCPH developed a monitoring plan for ELC program subrecipients, hired additional staff, and began performing monitoring reviews during the year ended June 30, 2022. The monitoring plan requires annual risk assessments, quarterly progress reviews, and completion of a financial monitoring review once during the contract period. If deficiencies are found during the monitoring review, the monitoring plan requires the subrecipient to submit a written corrective action plan to the DCPH, and the DCPH to follow up on the corrective action plan. Due to the delayed implementation of the monitoring plan, the DCPH did not perform all required financial monitoring reviews of ELC program subrecipients during state fiscal year 2022. Our review of a randomly-selected sample of contracts for 21 of the 219 ELC program subrecipient contracts requiring financial monitoring reviews noted risk assessments had been performed for all contracts; however, financial monitoring reviews had not been completed as of June 30, 2022, for 7 contracts (33 percent). We noted financial monitoring reviews were subsequently performed in state fiscal year 2023 for all 7 contracts included in the sample. DCPH officials indicated the delayed implementation of subrecipient monitoring procedures was due to the rapid distribution of COVID-19 funding to subrecipients and insufficient staffing, but they intend to have all reviews completed by March 2024. When subrecipient monitoring procedures are not performed timely and in accordance with monitoring plan requirements, there is increased risk that noncompliance with program requirements will go undetected. Recommendation: The DHSS through the DCPH continue to implement and perform financial monitoring reviews in accordance with the ELC program monitoring plan. Auditee's Response: We agree with the auditor's finding. Our Corrective Action Plan includes our planned actions to address the finding.
Finding Reference Number: 2022-004 NH Governor?s Office of Emergency Relief and Recovery COVID-19 Coronavirus Relief Fund (Assistance Listing #21.019) Federal Award Numbers: Not Applicable Federal Award Year: 2020 U.S. Department of Treasury Compliance Requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency Prior Year Finding: 2021-011 Statistically Valid Sample: No Criteria A pass-through entity must: 1. Clearly identify to the subrecipient required award information and applicable requirements described in 2 CFR section 200.331(a); 2. Evaluate each subrecipient?s risk of noncompliance for the purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring related to the subaward (2 CFR section 300.331(b)); and 3. Issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to federal award provided to the subrecipient from the subrecipient as required by 2 CFR section 200.521. Additionally, 2 CFR section 200.303(a) states that non-federal entities must establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provide reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. Condition Under the Coronavirus Relief Fund Program (CRF), the State of New Hampshire (the State) entered into various grant agreements with a third parties to provide program services under the CRF program. As part of our testwork over the subrecipient monitoring process, we noted the following breakdown of internal controls: A. The State communicates award information to the subrecipient through the approved grant agreement. During our testwork over the communication of award information, we noted instances where the State did not communicate all the required award information as outlined in 2 CFR section 200.331. Specifically, we noted the following: a. The indirect cost rate for the federal award, including if the de minimis rate is charged, was not included in each of the 7 grant agreements selected for testwork. b. Identification of whether the award is R&D was not included in 2 of 7 grant agreements selected for testwork. B. For 5 of 7 subrecipients selected for testwork, there was no evidence provided that a risk assessment had been performed for the subrecipient. While a risk assessment was not performed, we noted that for all 7 subrecipients selected for testwork that the State performed during the award monitoring procedures. C. The State did not appear to have policies and procedures over internal controls in place to determine if a subrecipient had a Uniform Guidance report if the amount awarded to the subrecipient under the CRF program was under the audit threshold of $750,000. Based on our independent review of uniform guidance submissions within the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, none of the 7 subrecipients selected for testwork had a submitted uniform guidance report, and as such, a management decision letter would not have been required to be submitted for the each of the 7 subrecipients. Cause The cause of the condition found is due to insufficient policies and internal controls to ensure that grant agreements contain the appropriate award notification information, that documented risk assessments are performed and that a comprehensive review to determine if subrecipients had a uniform guidance submitted regardless of the amount awarded under this federal award. Effect The effect of the condition found is that the State did not have sufficient internal controls in place in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.303(a)) and 200.332.(a). In addition, subrecipients could have had a uniform guidance report issued in which a management decision letter needed to be issued but as the Department does not evaluate this for subrecipient?s that were not granted more than $750,000, they would not be able to recognize the need for a management decision letter timely. Questioned Costs None. Recommendation We recommend that the State review its existing internal controls, policies, and procedures to ensure that the State complies with the provisions of 2 CFR section 200.332(a), 2 CFR section 200.332(b), and 2 CFR section 200.251. This would include ensuring that: 1. All required award information is communicated to subrecipients; 2. Documented risk assessments are performed over all subrecipients; and 3. All subrecipients are reviewed regardless of amount awarded to determine if a uniform guidance report was issued and if a management decision letter should be issued. View of Responsible Officials The State concurs in part with the findings and concurs in part with the recommendations. Given that CARES Act CRF is a funding source that is no longer eligible for use because program obligations were required to be entered into by December 31, 2021, and program expenditures complete by September 30, 2022, there are no ongoing CRF funded projects or programs. As a result, any corrective actions would relate to ensuring any other federal funding sources are achieving compliance requirements. With regard to condition A, the State partially concurs. Federal guidance concerning CARES Act CRF did not allow for charging indirect costs. That guidance indicated ?Payments from the Fund are not administered as part of a traditional grant program and the provisions of the Uniform Guidance, 2 CFR part 200, that are applicable to indirect costs do not apply. Recipients may not apply their indirect costs rates to payments received from the Fund.? Thus, awardees and recipients of funds were not permitted to charge indirect costs against CARES Act CRF. However, the state acknowledges inclusion of language specifically acknowledging the disallowance of indirect costs could have been included in the agreements. With regard to condition B, the State concurs. The four identified subrecipients were awardees of a program that was facilitated at the very end of CARES Act CRF eligibility for the period of performance. This program was run due to updated guidance by U.S. Treasury on December 14, 2021, that extended the deadline for expenditure of funds so long as obligations were entered into by December 31, 2021. That program largely resulted in direct beneficiary awards, but due to the nature of some expenditures awarded some entities received a subaward. Those subawards identified a brief timeline for project completion, between December 2021 and September 2022. Most projects were completed in February and March, with two of the subrecipients finalizing projects in September. Given the nature and timing of the program, those subawardees were closely monitored and regularly interacted with the State in order to receive reimbursement for eligible expenses and complete projects. The State can provide documentation of that monitoring and expense review. However, formal risk assessments were not initially done for those entities. Since then, the State has implemented policies and procedures that help ensure risk assessments are completed for all subrecipients, regardless of the nature of the program. With regard to condition C, the State concurs and has already implemented corrective actions to ensure procedures and policies are in place concerning Uniform Guidance Report review and the issuance of any necessary management decision letters to the extent required and where this deficiency could impact any other sources of federal funding. It is worth noting that the State in most cases has timely conducted risk assessments of subrecipients and reviewed relevant Uniform Guidance Reports, but its corrective action will result in better documentation of that process and protocol. Anticipated Completion Date: The corrective actions indicated above have already been implemented as of the date of this response. Contact Person: Steve Giovinelli and Chase Hagaman
Finding Reference Number: 2022-007 NH Governor?s Office of Emergency Relief and Recovery COVID-19 Homeowners Assistance Fund Program (Assistance Listing #21.026) Federal Award Numbers: HAFP-0190 Federal Award Year: 2021 U.S. Department of Treasury Compliance Requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Type of Finding: Material Weakness and Material Noncompliance Prior Year Finding: None Statistically Valid Sample: No Criteria A pass-through entity must: 1. Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward, and achieves performance goals (2 CFR sections 200.332(d) through (f). In addition to procedures identified as necessary based upon the evaluation of subrecipient risk or specifically required through the terms and conditions of the award, subaward monitoring must include following up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means; and 2. Issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to federal award provided to the subrecipient from the subrecipient as required by 2 CFR section 200.521. Additionally, 2 CFR section 200.303(a) states the non Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition The New Hampshire Governor?s Office of Emergency Relief and Recovery (the Office) entered into a subrecipient grant agreement whereby the subrecipient is responsible for determining benefit eligibility as well as calculating the benefit amount that the participant is eligible to receive. During the year ended June 30, 2022, the Department passed through $49,250,000 to its subrecipient. As part of our testwork over the subrecipient monitoring process, we noted the following: A. The Office obtains bi-weekly reports from the subrecipient that provides information related to cumulative cases, status of the case as well as geographic data surrounding the counties assisted. We selected 1 of the 3 bi-weekly reports received by the Office and noted that while the report was received, there was no documented evidence to support that the Office had reviewed the report as part of its monitoring procedures. B. The subrecipient has a quality control process in place whereby it selects samples of cases to ensure that the eligibility determination for the case was appropriate and there is appropriate documentation to substantiate the amount paid to the participant. The subrecipient submits a QC report to the Office summarizing the results of the review, including any items that require corrective action. We selected 2 of the 4 QC reports received by the Office during the audit period and noted that while the QC reports were received by the Office, there was no documented evidence to support that the Office had reviewed the QC report as part of its monitoring process. C. The Office obtains and reviews the subrecipients uniform guidance report on an annual basis. The Office currently does not have a process in place to track the date in which the audit report was reviewed. As such, we were unable to determine if the Office reviewed the uniform guidance report timely. Per review of the subrecipient uniform guidance report, there were no matters identified within the audit report that would require the Office to issue a management decision letter. D. As part of the Office?s federal reporting requirements, the Office obtains information directly from the subrecipient that is used to compile federal reports. The Department does not perform any documented monitoring procedures over the data submitted by the subrecipient to ensure that the following data used is by the Office within the report is complete and accurate: a. the number of unique homeowners that received assistance and subset that are classified as socially disadvantaged and 100 percent are median income or less b. the number homeowners and the amount of funding homeowners received, disaggregated by program design element are complete and accurate. Cause The cause of the condition found is due to insufficient procedures for ensuring monitoring activities performed are documented. Per inquiry of management, we noted that the Office meets weekly with the subrecipient and as part of these meetings, the bi-weekly reports, the QC reports and the data collected that is used as the basis for federal reporting are discussed. However, there is no evidence such as meeting minutes or agendas maintained to validate that this review occurred at an appropriate precision level. In addition, the review of the subrecipient?s uniform guidance report is documented along with its risk assessment process, which may not correspond with the actual receipt and review of the uniform guidance report. Effect The effect of the condition found is that the Office did not comply with 2 CFR section 200.332(d) through (f) and may not issue a management decision timely as required in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.521. Questioned Costs None. Recommendation We recommend that the Office formalize policies and procedures and implement the necessary internal controls to ensure that the Office complies with the provisions of CFR section 200.332(d) through (f) and 2 CFR section 200.251. This would include ensuring that: 1. During the award monitoring procedures are documented and any items requiring follow up or a corrective action are resolved timely and 2. Ensure that all uniform guidance reports are collected and reviewed timely so that a management decision letter can be issued within the time period required by federal regulations. 3. Data collected from the subrecipient used to compile federal reports is monitored to ensure that the data is complete and accurate. View of Responsible Officials The State concurs in part with the findings and recommended action. The State?s HAF program fully launched in March 2022 of the Fiscal Year under review, which ended June 30, 2022. On the whole, a more robust subrecipient monitoring framework and process is being implemented during the current Fiscal Year for this program. However, the State has engaged in thorough monitoring of its subrecipient, receiving and reviewing recurring biweekly and quarterly reports. As noted, discussion of those reports takes place during weekly conversations with the subrecipient. However, the State has acknowledged that it needs to more formally memorialize the substance of such conversations to demonstrate such review. This change in protocol and procedure has already been implemented during this Fiscal Year. The State has also engaged in a subrecipient risk assessment and review of audited financials for the purposes of uniform guidance report review. However, its process and protocols will be revised to better demonstrate when such reviews/assessments take place moving forward. Moreover, the State relies on its subrecipient to facilitate the State?s HAF program, which includes collecting and processing data, as outlined in the program?s policy guide manual. A key feature of that process is a detailed quality control protocol. Additionally, during this Fiscal Year, the State engaged in a robust, on-site review of the subrecipient?s quality control protocols and methods, including applicant file review, and found them satisfactory and reliable. The State also works closely with its subrecipient during the quarterly and annual U.S. Treasury reporting processes, which involves reviewing and analyzing data provided by the subrecipient for reporting purposes. This review and the resulting communications can result in corrections to data prior to submission to U.S. Treasury. Corrective Action and Anticipated Completion Date: As of this response, the State has already implemented several corrective actions that align with the recommendations above, including documentation of report review during weekly calls with the subrecipient, timestamping procedures for uniform guidance report review, and on site, detailed review of quality control protocols that involved applicant file review. The State will further ensure that such updated protocols and procedures are memorialized in the Programs? transaction processing memo during its Q1 2023 update, including any protocols necessary to ensure timely issuance of any required management decisions relative to the subrecipient. Contact Person: Chase Hagaman, Lisa Cota-Robles, and Michele Zangri-Crean
Finding Reference Number: 2022-008 NH Governor?s Office of Emergency Relief and Recovery COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (Assistance Listing #21.027) Federal Award Numbers: SLFRP0145 Federal Award Year: 2021 U.S. Department of Treasury Compliance Requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency Prior Year Finding: None Statistically Valid Sample: No Criteria A pass-through entity must: 1. Clearly identify to the subrecipient required award information and applicable requirements described in 2 CFR section 200.332(a); 2. Evaluate each subrecipient?s risk of noncompliance for the purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring related to the subaward (2 CFR section 300.332(b)); 3. Issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to federal award provided to the subrecipient from the subrecipient as required by 2 CFR section 200.521. Additionally, per 2 CFR section 200.303, non-federal entities must establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provide reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. Condition As part of the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds program, the State of New Hampshire (the State) entered into grant agreements with local entities to support allowable activities under the federal program. During the year ended June 30, 2022, the State passed through $2,108,597 to subrecipients. As part of our testwork over the subrecipient monitoring process, we noted the following breakdown of internal controls: A. The State communicates award information to subrecipients through the approved grant agreement. Per review of the grant agreement, for 5 of the 10 subrecipients selected for testwork, the State did not communicate all the required award information as outlined in 2 CFR section 200.332. Specifically, the following elements were not communicated: a. Indirect cost rate for federal awards (including if the deminimus rate is charged per 2 CFR section 200.414) was not communicated for 5 of 10 subrecipients selected for testwork. b. Identification of whether the award is R&D was not communicated for 3 of 10 subrecipients selected for testwork. A. For 2 of 10 subrecipients selected for testwork, there was no documented risk assessment performed over the subrecipient. The State indicated that they had previous experience with these 2 subrecipients and based upon the previous relationship a formal risk assessment was not necessary. As part of our audit, we inquired as to whether a risk assessment was performed in connection with other federal awards that were granted to these entities, but a risk assessment was not able to be provided. While a risk assessment was not performed, we noted that for all each of these 2 subrecipients that the State performed during the award monitoring procedures. B. The State did not appear to have policies and procedures in place to determine if a subrecipient had a Uniform Guidance report if the amount awarded to the subrecipient under this program was under the audit threshold of $750,000. Based on our independent review of uniform guidance submissions within the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, none of the 10 subrecipients selected for testwork had a submitted uniform guidance report, and as such, a management decision letter would not have been required to be submitted for the each of the 10 subrecipients. Cause The cause of the condition found is primarily due to insufficient internal controls and procedures to ensure that award identification information is properly communicated, that risk assessments are performed to ensure sufficient during the awarded monitoring is performed and that all subrecipients are reviewed to determine if a uniform guidance audit was issued regardless of amount awarded to the subrecipient. Given the nature of this program, several Departments within the State entered into subrecipient grants resulting in a decentralized process. Not all Departments within the State are experienced with subrecipient relationships and may not have had developed policies to comply with subrecipient monitoring requirements. Effect The effect of the condition found is that the State did not have sufficient internal controls in place in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.303(a)) and 200.332.(a). In addition, subrecipients could have had a uniform guidance report issued in which a management decision letter needed to be issued but as the Department does not evaluate this for subrecipient?s that were not granted more than $750,000, they would not be able to recognize the need for a management decision letter timely. Questioned Costs None. Recommendation We recommend that the State review its existing internal controls, policies, and procedures to ensure that the State complies with the provisions of 2 CFR section 200.332(a), 2 CFR section 200.332(b), and 2 CFR section 200.251. This would include ensuring that: 1. All required award information is communicated to subrecipients; 2. Documented risk assessments are performed over all subrecipients; and 3. All subrecipients are reviewed regardless of amount awarded to determine if a uniform guidance report was issued and if a management decision letter should be issued. View of Responsible Officials The State largely concurs with the findings and recommendations and has either implemented procedures to address the identified conditions already or will do so. With regard to condition A(a) and (b), although the State illustrated that it includes clauses related to allowed costs in its subawards, including direct and indirect costs, it will work to ensure that agencies entering into such agreements clearly indicate the terms required by Uniform Guidance, including permitted indirect cost rates and whether the award is for R&D. With regard to condition B, the State agrees that risk assessments should have been completed and has since implemented a framework to help ensure that agencies are more consistently conducting and documenting subrecipient risk assessments. With regard to condition C, the State concurs and has already implemented an agency-wide framework to help ensure procedures and policies are in place concerning Uniform Guidance Report review and the issuance of any necessary management decision letters, to the extent required. It is worth noting that the State in most cases has timely conducted risk assessments of subrecipients and reviewed relevant Uniform Guidance Reports, but its corrective actions will result in better documentation and more consistent and timelier follow through. Anticipated Completion Date: The corrective actions indicated above relative to conditions B and C have already been implemented as of the date of this response. The State will work to address Condition A before the end of the current Fiscal Year. Contact Person: Chase Hagaman and Steve Giovinelli
Finding Reference Number: 2022-012 NH Department of Business and Economic Affairs COVID-19 State Small Business Credit Initiative Technical Assistance Grant Program (Assistance Listing #21.031) Federal Award Numbers: NOI-0000178 Federal Award Year: 2022 U.S. Department of Treasury Compliance Requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Type of Finding: Material Weakness and Material Noncompliance Prior Year Finding: None Statistically Valid Sample: No Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR section 200.1, a subrecipient is an entity, usually but not limited to non-federal entities, that receives a subaward from a pass-through entity to carry out part of a federal award; but does not include an individual that is a beneficiary of such award. A pass-through entity must clearly identify to the subrecipient required award information and applicable requirements described in 2 CFR section 200.332(a). The following items are required to be communicated: a. Subrecipient name (which must match the name associated with its unique entity identifier); b. Subrecipient's unique entity identifier; c. Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN); d. Federal Award Date (see ? 200.39 Federal award date) of award to the recipient by the Federal agency; e. Subaward Period of Performance Start and End Date; f. Amount of Federal Funds Obligated by this action by the pass-through entity to the subrecipient; g. Total Amount of Federal Funds Obligated to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity including the current obligation; h. Total Amount of the Federal Award committed to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity; i. Federal award project description, as required to be responsive to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA); j. Name of Federal awarding agency, pass-through entity, and contact information for awarding official of the Pass-through entity; k. CFDA Number and Name; the pass-through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each Federal award and the CFDA number at time of disbursement; l. Identification of whether the award is R&D; and m. Indirect cost rate for the Federal award (including if the de minimis rate is charged per ? 200.414 Indirect (F&A) costs). Additionally, per 2 CFR section 200.303, non-federal entities must establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provide reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. Condition As part of the State Small Business Credit Initiative Technical Assistance Grant Program (SSBCI), the New Hampshire Department of Business and Economic Affairs (the Department) entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with a subrecipient that passed through all programmatic and financial responsibilities of the federal award to the subrecipient. The total amount of funds passed through during the period ending June 30, 2022 was $19,661,597. During our review of the MOU, the Department did not communicate any of the required award information outlined within 2 CFR 200.332(a). Cause The cause of the condition found was the result of the Department being unaware that the agreement they entered was a subrecipient relationship and that they were required to communicate the required award information contained within 2 CFR 200.332(a). Effect The effect of the condition found is that the Department did not comply with 2 CFR section 200.332(a). Questioned Costs None. Recommendation We recommend that the Department review its existing internal controls, policies, and procedures to ensure that the Department complies with the provisions of 2 CFR section 200.332(a) by ensuring that all required award information is communicated to subrecipients. View of Responsible Officials The Department acknowledges the misinterpretation of the agreement as a subaward has led to a failure to comply with 2 CFR section 200.332(a). Underlying this misinterpretation was the Department?s failure to differentiate between entering into agreements with other state agencies and entities recognized as component units of state government such as the NH Business Finance Authority; noting agreements between state agencies would not require such compliance. Accordingly, the Department will review existing policies and procedures related to subawarding and subrecipient monitoring to ensure agreements with component units of state government are properly considered. Additionally, the Department will amend the existing agreement to ensure required award information is communicated and ensure all other subrecipient monitoring protocols are applied to the subaward. Anticipated Completion Date: June 30, 2023 Contact Person: Taylor Caswell
Finding Reference Number: 2022-014 NH Department of Education Special Education Cluster (Assistance Listing #84.027 and #84.173) Federal Award Numbers: H027A210103, H173A210109, H027A180103, H173A180109 Federal Award Year: 2021, 2022 U.S. Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Type of Finding: Material Weakness and Material Noncompliance Prior Year Finding: None Statistically Valid Sample: No Criteria A pass-through entity must clearly identify to the subrecipient required award information and applicable requirements described in 2 CFR section 200.332(a); Additionally, per 2 CFR section 200.303, non-federal entities must establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provide reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. Condition During the year ended June 30, 2022, the New Hampshire Department of Education (the Department) passed through $50,310,796 of federal funding to 174 subrecipients. As part of our testing related subrecipient monitoring, we noted that the Department communicates to subrecipients through the Grant Award Notifications (GANs). Per review of the GAN, we noted the following: A. For 44 of 44 subrecipients selected for testwork, the Department did not communicate the federal award identification number. B. For 15 of 44 subrecipients selected for testwork, the Department did not communicate the full award amount. Instead, the Department only communicated the subrecipients first installment amount entered into Grant Management System (GMS) which is a portion of the subrecipient?s total federal funding allocation. Cause The cause of the condition found was primarily due to breakdown of internal controls to ensure that the Grant Award Notification sent to subrecipients includes all required award data elements, including federal award identification number and full award amount. Effect The effect of the condition found is that the Department may not be in compliance with 2 CFR section 200.332(a)(1). Questioned Costs Not determinable. Recommendation We recommend that the Department review its existing policies and procedures over subrecipient monitoring award identification requirements and revise procedures and internal controls to ensure that information described in 2 CFR section 200.332(a)(1) is clearly identified to the subrecipient at the time of subaward (or subsequent subaward modification). View of Responsible Officials NHED concurs with the finding identified in section A. This was an oversight on the part of NHED, and a process has been implemented to ensure that when the GAN template is generated, there is a review by 2 separate staff members to ensure all required elements on the GAN are complete. NHED concurs with the finding identified in Section B. The previous Division Director of Learner Support, without understanding the unintended consequences, required that the IDEA allocations be uploaded in separate installments instead of including the full year award amount. This led to a GAN generation that included only the first installment. This procedure has since been corrected and NHED is now uploading the full year allocation amount in GMS, this will then generate a GAN that reflects the full year grant amount. If a reallocation does occur, there is a review by 2 separate staff members to ensure that the amount is verified and that a new GAN is manually generated to include that verified amount, and then the GAN is reissued to the recipient. Anticipated Completion Date: Already completed Contact Person: Lindsey Labonville
Finding Reference Number: 2022-014 NH Department of Education Special Education Cluster (Assistance Listing #84.027 and #84.173) Federal Award Numbers: H027A210103, H173A210109, H027A180103, H173A180109 Federal Award Year: 2021, 2022 U.S. Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Type of Finding: Material Weakness and Material Noncompliance Prior Year Finding: None Statistically Valid Sample: No Criteria A pass-through entity must clearly identify to the subrecipient required award information and applicable requirements described in 2 CFR section 200.332(a); Additionally, per 2 CFR section 200.303, non-federal entities must establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provide reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. Condition During the year ended June 30, 2022, the New Hampshire Department of Education (the Department) passed through $50,310,796 of federal funding to 174 subrecipients. As part of our testing related subrecipient monitoring, we noted that the Department communicates to subrecipients through the Grant Award Notifications (GANs). Per review of the GAN, we noted the following: A. For 44 of 44 subrecipients selected for testwork, the Department did not communicate the federal award identification number. B. For 15 of 44 subrecipients selected for testwork, the Department did not communicate the full award amount. Instead, the Department only communicated the subrecipients first installment amount entered into Grant Management System (GMS) which is a portion of the subrecipient?s total federal funding allocation. Cause The cause of the condition found was primarily due to breakdown of internal controls to ensure that the Grant Award Notification sent to subrecipients includes all required award data elements, including federal award identification number and full award amount. Effect The effect of the condition found is that the Department may not be in compliance with 2 CFR section 200.332(a)(1). Questioned Costs Not determinable. Recommendation We recommend that the Department review its existing policies and procedures over subrecipient monitoring award identification requirements and revise procedures and internal controls to ensure that information described in 2 CFR section 200.332(a)(1) is clearly identified to the subrecipient at the time of subaward (or subsequent subaward modification). View of Responsible Officials NHED concurs with the finding identified in section A. This was an oversight on the part of NHED, and a process has been implemented to ensure that when the GAN template is generated, there is a review by 2 separate staff members to ensure all required elements on the GAN are complete. NHED concurs with the finding identified in Section B. The previous Division Director of Learner Support, without understanding the unintended consequences, required that the IDEA allocations be uploaded in separate installments instead of including the full year award amount. This led to a GAN generation that included only the first installment. This procedure has since been corrected and NHED is now uploading the full year allocation amount in GMS, this will then generate a GAN that reflects the full year grant amount. If a reallocation does occur, there is a review by 2 separate staff members to ensure that the amount is verified and that a new GAN is manually generated to include that verified amount, and then the GAN is reissued to the recipient. Anticipated Completion Date: Already completed Contact Person: Lindsey Labonville
Program: AL 84.010 ? Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies ? Allowability and Subrecipient Monitoring Grant Number & Year: S010A190027, FFY 2020; S010A200027, FFY 2021 Federal Grantor Agency: U.S. Department of Education Criteria: Per 2 CFR ? 3474.1 (January 1, 2022), the U.S. Department of Education adopted the OMB Uniform Guidance in 2 CFR part 200, except for 2 CFR ? 200.102(a) and 200.207(a). Per 2 CFR ? 200.403 (January 1, 2022), allowable costs must be necessary, reasonable, and adequately documented. 2 CFR ? 200.430(i)(1) (January 1, 2022) states, in relevant part, the following: Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: (i) Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated; (ii) Be incorporated into the official records of the non-Federal entity; (iii) Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non-Federal entity, not exceeding 100% of compensated activities . . . . ; (iv) Encompass federally-assisted and all other activities compensated by the non-Federal entity on an integrated basis, but may include the use of subsidiary records as defined in the non-Federal entity?s written policy; (v) Comply with the established accounting policies and practices of the non-Federal entity . . . . ; and * * * * (vii) Support the distribution of the employee?s salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and non-Federal award; an indirect cost activity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities which are allocated using different allocation bases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity. Enclosure A of the ?Letter to Chief State School Officers on Granting Administrative Flexibility for Better Measures of Success? (September 7, 2012) provides guidelines for local educational agencies (LEAs), using a substitute system for time-and-effort reporting. Enclosure A states, in relevant part, the following: (3) Employee schedules must: a. Indicate the specific activity or cost objective that the employee worked on for each segment of the employee?s schedule; b. Account for the total hours for which each employee is compensated during the period reflected on the employee?s schedule; and c. Be certified at least semiannually and signed by the employee and a supervisory official having firsthand knowledge of the work performed by the employee. 2 CFR ? 200.332 (January 1, 2022) states, in relevant part, the following: All pass-through entities must: * * * * (d) Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: * * * * (2) Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity detected through audits, on-site reviews, and written confirmation from the subrecipient . . . . A good internal control plan requires that adequate documentation be maintained to support amounts claimed by and paid to subrecipients. Good internal control also requires procedures to follow up with subrecipients to ensure they are correcting deficiencies and in compliance with applicable regulations. Condition: The Agency lacked procedures to ensure that subrecipients documented their use of Federal awards appropriately. Repeat Finding: No Questioned Costs: $145,101 known (S010A190027, $8,041; S010A200027, $137,060) Statistical Sample: No Context: We randomly selected 25 subrecipient payments and also chose the largest subrecipient payment for testing. We noted the following: ? Several employees? salaries and benefits were included in the reimbursement requests; however, the Agency did not require subrecipients to submit documentation for these expenditures, other than reports from their accountings systems, at the time of reimbursement. We provided the Agency with an opportunity to request documentation from its subrecipients to support that their salaries and benefits expenses were allowable and in accordance with Federal cost principles; however, two of the subrecipients did not provide adequate support to show that their salaries and benefits were allocable to the grant, resulting in $8,041 sample questioned costs and $137,060 non-sample questioned costs. ? The Agency?s procedure is to perform fiscal reviews of each subrecipient at least once every three years. We reviewed the most recent fiscal reviews for the same 26 subrecipients selected for testing above. For five of these reviews, the Agency noted that the subrecipient did not maintain adequate documentation for salaries and benefits. When we inquired with the Agency regarding what had been done to follow up on its findings, the Agency replied that the findings did not require follow-up. Payment errors noted for the sample tested were $8,041. The total sample tested was $1,494,006. Subrecipient aid payments for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2022, totaled $91,043,602. The sample population was $84,396,850 (total population $91,043,602 less $6,646,752 to largest subrecipient that was separately determined to be allowable). Based on the sample tested, the case error rate was 8% (2/25). The dollar error rate for the sample was 0.54% ($8,041/$1,494,006), which estimates the potential dollars at risk for fiscal year 2022 to be $455,753 (dollar rate multiplied by the population). Cause: Inadequate procedures. Effect: Without adequate supporting documentation and monitoring procedures, there is an increased risk that Federal awards could be used for unallowable costs. Recommendation: We recommend the Agency improve procedures to monitor subrecipients, including reviewing detailed supporting documentation for payroll expenses and following up with subrecipients to ensure that they correct errors noted. Management Response: The Department agrees the two subrecipients sampled did not complete one time and effort certification semi-annually (rather completed annually instead) or with all language suggested in the guidelines from the U.S. Department of Education. However, the Department disagrees with the reimbursement being questioned costs as the time and effort certifications demonstrated adequate documentation to support the employees? activities were allowable for the Title I grant. In the absence of this information, the Department submitted affidavits from the two LEA?s supervisory staff with personal knowledge of the work performed consistent with the U.S. Department of Education?s audit resolutions practices; whereas the APA does not consider documentation after the fact to be adequate to eliminate the finding. The findings noted in the subrecipient fiscal monitoring exit letters were identified for technical assistance purposes only and not considered to have met a level of materiality that required a corrective action plan. Corrective action plans are clearly noted in subrecipient fiscal monitoring exit letters when issued and proper follow-up action is taken when this occurs. Technical assistance was provided to each of the subrecipients at the time of the monitoring review as well as to all subrecipients periodically throughout the year. APA Response: Per the Uniform Guidance, questioned costs include expenditures that lack adequate supporting documentation at the time of the audit. 2 CFR ? 200.430(i)(1) (January 1, 2022), as referenced in the report comment, says that such documentation must ?accurately reflect the work performed? and be ?supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated.? Affidavits dated February 27, 2023, some 18 months after the salary and benefit expenses occurred, cannot possibly satisfy either of these requirements and are, therefore, not acceptable. As the documentation provided did not meet the minimum requirements set forth in Uniform Guidance and guidance issued by the U.S. Department of Education, the expenditures at issue must be considered questioned costs. Moreover, the Uniform Guidance requires the Agency, as the pass-through entity, to ensure that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action to address deficiencies identified not only during audits but also from the Agency?s own reviews. The Agency has noted issues similar to those addressed by the APA ? namely, that the subrecipients have lacked adequate supporting documentation for salary and benefit expenses. The Agency performs subrecipient fiscal monitoring for most subrecipients only every third year. Thus, effective follow-up procedures, as required by 2 CFR ? 200.332 (January 1, 2022), are needed to ensure that subrecipients implement the technical assistance provided by the Agency.
Program: AL 20.205 ? Highway Planning & Construction ? Subrecipient Monitoring Grant Number & Year: Various Federal Grantor Agency: U.S. Department of Transportation Criteria: Per 2 CFR ? 1201.1 (January 1, 2022), the U.S. Department of Transportation adopted the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements set forth at Title 2 CFR part 200. 2 CFR ? 200.332(a) (January 1, 2022) requires all pass-through entities to do the following: Ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the following information at the time of the subaward and if any of these data elements change, include the changes in subsequent subaward modification . . . . Required information includes: (1) Federal award identification. * * * * (ii) Subrecipient's unique entity identifier; (iii) Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN); (iv) Federal Award Date (see the definition of Federal award date in ? 200.1 of this part) of award to the recipient by the Federal agency; * * * * (vii) Amount of Federal Funds Obligated by this action by the pass-through entity to the subrecipient; (viii) Total Amount of Federal Funds Obligated to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity including the current financial obligation; (ix) Total Amount of the Federal Award committed to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity; * * * * (xii) Assistance Listings number and Title; the pass-through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each Federal award and the Assistance Listings Number at time of disbursement; Good internal control requires procedure to ensure that subrecipients are informed of all required information. Condition: The Agency did not communicate all required information to subrecipients. We noted further that the Agency lacked procedures for ensuring subrecipients have sufficient accounting controls to manage Federal funds properly. Repeat Finding: No Questioned Costs: Unknown Statistical Sample: No Context: During the fiscal year, there were 46 subaward projects to a total of eight subrecipients. We tested five subawards and noted the Agency did not properly communicate the subrecipients? unique entity identifier, the Federal Award Identification Number, Federal award date, and amount of Federal funds obligated and committed for all five subrecipient projects tested. Additionally, for one of five projects tested, the Assistance Listing number and title was not communicated. Subrecipient expenditures totaled $29,277,795 during the fiscal year. Cause: The program agreement template used for subrecipient awards does not include all required Federal award identification data elements. For the one project where the Federal Assistance Listings number and title was not communicated, the program agreement was completed in 2006, prior to the program agreement template being changed to include this information. Effect: Noncompliance with Federal regulations could result in sanctions. When subrecipients are not informed of all required information, there is an increased risk for subrecipient noncompliance, including with audit requirements. Recommendation: We recommend the Agency implement procedures to ensure that subrecipient program agreements include all information required to be communicated. Management Response: NDOT concurs with finding and will review all current active agreements to ensure notification of each federal subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient.
Program: AL 20.509 ? Formula Grants for Rural Areas ? Allowability & Subrecipient Monitoring Grant Number & Year: NE-2019-013-00, FFY 2017 Federal Grantor Agency: U.S. Department of Transportation Criteria: Per 2 CFR ? 1201.1 (January 1, 2022), the U.S. Department of Transportation adopted the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements set forth at Title 2 CFR part 200. 2 CFR ? 200.403 (January 1, 2022) requires costs to be reasonable, necessary, and adequately documented. A good internal control plan requires procedures to be in place to ensure compliance with Federal and State requirements. 2 CFR ? 200.332(d) (January 1, 2022) requires the pass-through entity to do the following: Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved. 2 CFR ? 200.430(i)(1) (January 1, 2022) states the following, in relevant part: Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: (i) Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated; * * * * (vii) Support the distribution of the employee?s salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and non-Federal award; an indirect cost activity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities which are allocated using different allocation bases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity. (viii) Budget estimates (i.e., estimates determined before the services are performed) alone do not qualify as support for charges to Federal awards . . . [.] Per 2 CFR ? 200.405(a) (January 1, 2022), ?A cost is allocable to a particular Federal award or other cost objective if the goods or services involved are chargeable or assignable to that Federal award or cost objective in accordance with relative benefits received.? Condition: The Agency lacked adequate documentation to support that payments were for allowable activities and in accordance with Federal cost principles. A similar finding was noted in the prior audit. Repeat Finding: 2021-065 Questioned Costs: $64,704 known Statistical Sample: No Context: We tested 25 payments to 22 subrecipients and three vendors. The Agency performed financial desk reviews for subrecipients; however, the reviews tested were not adequate. When desk reviews were not adequate, we provided the Agency with the opportunity to obtain additional support from the subrecipient; however, adequate support was not obtained. We noted the following: ? For nine subrecipients tested, documentation was not adequate to support that personnel charges were allowable and in accordance with Federal cost principles. The Agency did not have timesheets, time certifications, or other payroll documentation on file for all reimbursement requests. In some cases, payroll documentation was on file, but there was not adequate support to verify that the correct amount was charged to the program, as timesheets were not sufficient to identify time allocated to the program when the employee did not work entirely on the Federal program. In addition, for some subrecipients there was not sufficient documentation to support the benefits reimbursed. ? For one subrecipient tested, fuel costs and maintenance expenses were not adequately supported. The expenses were not supported by invoices. ? For seven subrecipients tested, capital and nonoperating costs were not adequately supported. The Agency did not obtain documentation to support the percentage of nonoperating expenditures allocated to the program. Subrecipients may share building space with other city or county offices and, therefore, may be charged a portion of the rent and utilities. While this is allowable, the Agency must obtain documentation to support that the percent allocated to the transit program is reasonable; however, such supporting documentation was not available. We also noted that one subrecipient was improperly reimbursed for sales taxes. The sample population totaled $15,537,764, which included $12,810,135 paid to 60 subrecipients and $2,727,629 vendor payments. Federal payment errors noted in the sample totaled $24,600. The total Federal sample tested was $353,695. Based on the sample tested, the dollar error rate was 6.96% ($24,600/$353,695), which estimates the potential dollars at risk for fiscal year 2022 to be $1,081,428 (dollar error rate multiplied by population). North Fork Area Transit During the course of our audit, we became aware of potential fraud related to the North Fork Area Transit (NFAT), a subrecipient of the Agency. On December 15, 2022, the Director of NFAT was suspended. A warrant was issued for his arrest the next day, alleging theft of up to $1 million between April and December 2022. From April 1, 2022, through June 30, 2022, the Program reimbursed NFAT a total of $582,587. As a result, we selected the April 2022 reimbursement paid to NFAT in June 2022, totaling $101,519, for additional testing. During that testing we identified $40,104 in questioned costs due to the following: ? For all four non-operating personnel (director and managers), documentation was inadequate to support that personnel charges were allowable and in accordance with Federal cost principles, as the timesheets identified only times in and out and did not specify what work the nonoperating employee was performing for the Federal grant. Questioned costs due to the lack of support for nonoperating personnel totaled $24,104. ? A $20,000 payment for vehicle insurance was reported; however, there was no documentation to support how the amount was determined or why it was reasonable. Furthermore, the $20,000 paid was inconsistent with past vehicle insurance payments. We observed a check in March 2022 for $600 with the description that it was for March bus insurance, and previous testing identified $600 bus insurance checks in August 2020 and August 2021. As a result, we question the Federal share of $16,000. ? We also noted inconsistencies in supporting documentation for operating personnel (drivers and dispatchers). Variances were noted between timesheet hours and the payroll register. Due to the NFAT concerns, the APA has now commenced a thorough review of this entire matter, which will be reported separately at a later date. Cause: Procedures were not adequate to ensure that costs were in accordance with Federal requirements. Effect: Increased risk for errors or misuse of funds. Recommendation: We recommend the Agency strengthen subrecipient monitoring procedures. We further recommend the Agency improve procedures to ensure expenditures are allowable and in accordance with Federal regulations. Management Response: The NDOT Local Assistance Division has increased transit staff by 1.5 FTEs for a total of 3.5 FTEs dedicated to reviewing monthly invoices. NDOT continues to engage and educate transit recipients. In late 2022, the North Fork Area Transit (NFAT) Board began an internal review process which revealed an inappropriate use of funds and authorities were notified. In December 2022, the NFAT Board engaged NDOT and requested assistance from the Mobility Management Team following the allegation. The Mobility Management Team is assisting the NFAT Board in managing operations, review of existing reporting and financial policies, and review and update of step-by-step checks and balances process. NDOT is financially supporting the Mobility Management Team in an effort to support and resume services at NFAT.
Program: AL 21.026 ? COVID-19 Homeowner Assistance Fund ? Subrecipient Monitoring Grant Number & Year: N/A Federal Grantor Agency: U.S. Department of the Treasury Criteria: Per 2 CFR ? 1000.10 (January 1, 2022), the U.S. Department of the Treasury adopted the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements set forth at 2 CFR part 200. 2 CFR ? 200.332 (January 1, 2022) states the following, in relevant part: All pass through entities must: (a) Ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the following information at the time of the subaward and if any of these data elements change, include the changes in subsequent subaward modification. When some of this information is not available, the pass-through entity must provide the best information available to describe the Federal award and subaward. Required information includes: (1) Federal award identification (i) Subrecipient name (which must match the name associated with its unique entity identifier); (ii) Subrecipient?s unique entity identifier (iii) Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN); (iv) Federal Award Date (see the definition of Federal award date in ? 200.1 of this part) of award to the recipient by the Federal agency; (v) Subaward Period of Performance Start and End Date; (vi) Subaward Budget Period Start and End Date; (vii) Amount of Federal Funds Obligated by this action by the pass-through entity to the subrecipient; (viii) Total Amount of Federal Funds Obligated to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity including the current financial obligation; (ix) Total Amount of the Federal Award committed to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity; (x) Federal award project description, as required to be responsive to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA); (xi) Name of Federal awarding agency, pass-through entity, and contact information for awarding official of the Pass-through entity; (xii) Assistance Listings number and Title; the pass-through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each Federal award and the Assistance Listings Number at time of disbursement; (xiii) Identification of whether the award is R&D; and (xiv) Indirect cost rate for the Federal award (including if the de minimis rate is charged) per ? 200.414. * * * * (d) Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved. 2 CFR ? 200.333 (January 1, 2022) states the following: With prior written approval from the Federal awarding agency, a pass-through entity may provide subawards based on fixed amounts up to the Simplified Acquisition Threshold, provided that the subawards meet the requirements for fixed amount awards in ?200.201. 2 CFR ? 200.201 (January 1, 2022) states the following, in relevant part: (b) Fixed amount awards. In addition to the options described in paragraph (a) of this section, Federal awarding agencies, or pass-through entities as permitted in ? 200.333, may use fixed amount awards (see Fixed amount awards in ? 200.1) to which the following conditions apply: (1) The Federal award amount is negotiated using the cost principles (or other pricing information) as a guide. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may use fixed amount awards if the project scope has measurable goals and objectives and if adequate cost, historical, or unit pricing data is available to establish a fixed amount award based on a reasonable estimate of actual cost. . . . Good internal controls require procedures for the proper maintenance of program documents. Condition: The Agency lacked adequate procedures for monitoring subrecipients. Repeat Finding: No Questioned Costs: $451,851 known Statistical Sample: No Context: On November 2, 2021, the Agency signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the Nebraska Investment Finance Authority (NIFA) to assist the Agency in carrying out the Homeowner Assistance Fund (HAF) Program. The Agency agreed to pay NIFA an amount not to exceed $1,200,000 for services during the initial contract period of November 1, 2021, through January 31, 2023. This included: 1) a flat fee of $78,348 for delivery of an accepted HAF Plan; 2) a flat fee of $90,700 for implementation of the Program, payable the month following program launch; and 3) $69,081 per month, beginning February 2022, for ongoing project administration. During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2022, the Agency paid NIFA $451,581. We noted the following: ? The Agency did not have controls and procedures in place to ensure that subrecipient requirements were met. ? The Agency did not communicate the Federal award identification items required by 2 CFR ? 200.332. ? NIFA was to be paid fixed amounts; however, prior written approval of these fixed-amount payments, as required by 2 CFR ? 200.333, could not be provided. In addition, the Agency did not have adequate support to ensure that the amounts paid were reasonable, as required by 2 CFR ? 200.201. Furthermore, per an Employee Time Summary report, the actual cost for February through June 2022 was $152,301, compared to the $345,404 billed and paid for monthly services. Cause: Inadequate procedures. Effect: Increased risk of fraud and non-compliance with Federal guidelines. Recommendation: We recommend the Agency implement procedures to ensure that Federal guidelines are followed, and controls are in place for subrecipient monitoring. Management Response: The Military Department disagrees with this finding. The Military Department does require NIFA to comply with 2 CFR 200 and executes procedures and controls to ensure the Federal guidelines are followed. These include (but are not limited to) weekly program updates, monthly reporting of plan metrics, compliance reviews, monthly manpower evaluations of NIFA personnel against invoices to substantiate project management supporting the program and reasonableness of administration fees. In addition, the MOU with NIFA was amended to require monthly manpower evaluations to substantiate the monthly fee for project management and administration of the program beginning with July 2022 invoicing, thus changing from a flat fee to actual costs incurred. APA Response: Per 2 CFR ? 1000.10 (January 1, 2022), the U.S. Department of the Treasury adopted the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements set forth at 2 CFR part 200; therefore, the Agency is required to follow 2 CFR part 200. Payments during fiscal year ended June 30, 2022, were made under a fixed amount subaward. Fixed amount subawards are allowable only with prior written approval from the Federal awarding agency. The failure to communicate items required by 2 CFR ? 200.332 (January 1, 2022) illustrates further the inadequacy of Agency procedures.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 21.027, Department of Treasury, COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund (CSLFRF) Federal Award Identification Number and Year - N/A Pass-through Entity - N/A Finding Type - Significant deficiency and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - Per 2 CFR 200.332 (a), all pass-through entities must ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the following information at the time of the subaward and, if any of these data elements change, include the changes in subsequent subaward modification. When some of this information is not available, the pass-through entity must provide the best information available to describe the federal award and subaward. Required information includes the following: (1) Federal award identification (i) Subrecipient name (which must match the name associated with its unique entity identifier) (ii) Subrecipient's unique entity identifier (iii) Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN) (iv) Federal award date (see the definition of federal award date in ? 200.1 of this part) of award to the recipient by the federal agency (v) Subaward period of performance start and end date (vi) Subaward budget period start and end date (vii) Amount of federal funds obligated by this action by the pass-through entity to the subrecipient (viii) Total amount of federal funds obligated to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity, including the current financial obligation (ix) Total amount of the federal award committed to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity (x) Federal award project description, as required to be responsive to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) (xi) Name of federal awarding agency, pass-through entity, and contact information for awarding official of the pass-through entity (xii) Assistance Listing Numbers and title; the pass-through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each federal award and the Assistance Listing Numbers at time of disbursement (xiii) Identification of whether the award is R&D (xiv) Indirect cost rate for the federal award (including if the de minimis rate is charged) per ? 200.414 Condition - The CSLFRF subrecipient agreements did not include the CSLFRF assistance Listing Number (ALN), as required per 2 CFR 200.332 (a)(1)(xii). Questioned Costs - None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - During the fiscal year, the City passed through CSLFRF funding to three subrecipients. The agreements with the subrecipients included a reference to the applicable regulations provided by the Treasury and all the elements outlined under 2 CFR 200.331 (a)(1) with the exception of the ALN. Cause and Effect - The City?s controls did not ensure that the subrecipient agreements included all the required elements, as outlined under 2 CFR 200.332 (a)(1). The lack of information could result in noncompliance by the subrecipient, as well as incorrect SEFA reporting. Recommendation - We recommend the City implement adequate controls to ensure subrecipient agreements included all the required elements, as outlined under 2 CFR 200.332 a)(1). Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - The City has implemented a process to ensure that all subrecipient agreements contain the federal ALN, as required by 2 CFR 200.332. All subrecipient agreements will include a new exhibit as an attachment in the agreement that will include the ALN and any other required grant elements.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 21.027, Department of Treasury, COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund (CSLFRF) Federal Award Identification Number and Year - N/A Pass-through Entity - N/A Finding Type - Significant deficiency and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - Per 2 CFR 200.332 (a), all pass-through entities must ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the following information at the time of the subaward and, if any of these data elements change, include the changes in subsequent subaward modification. When some of this information is not available, the pass-through entity must provide the best information available to describe the federal award and subaward. Required information includes the following: (1) Federal award identification (i) Subrecipient name (which must match the name associated with its unique entity identifier) (ii) Subrecipient's unique entity identifier (iii) Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN) (iv) Federal award date (see the definition of federal award date in ? 200.1 of this part) of award to the recipient by the federal agency (v) Subaward period of performance start and end date (vi) Subaward budget period start and end date (vii) Amount of federal funds obligated by this action by the pass-through entity to the subrecipient (viii) Total amount of federal funds obligated to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity, including the current financial obligation (ix) Total amount of the federal award committed to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity (x) Federal award project description, as required to be responsive to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) (xi) Name of federal awarding agency, pass-through entity, and contact information for awarding official of the pass-through entity (xii) Assistance Listing Numbers and title; the pass-through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each federal award and the Assistance Listing Numbers at time of disbursement (xiii) Identification of whether the award is R&D (xiv) Indirect cost rate for the federal award (including if the de minimis rate is charged) per ? 200.414 Condition - The CSLFRF subrecipient agreements did not include the CSLFRF assistance Listing Number (ALN), as required per 2 CFR 200.332 (a)(1)(xii). Questioned Costs - None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - During the fiscal year, the City passed through CSLFRF funding to three subrecipients. The agreements with the subrecipients included a reference to the applicable regulations provided by the Treasury and all the elements outlined under 2 CFR 200.331 (a)(1) with the exception of the ALN. Cause and Effect - The City?s controls did not ensure that the subrecipient agreements included all the required elements, as outlined under 2 CFR 200.332 (a)(1). The lack of information could result in noncompliance by the subrecipient, as well as incorrect SEFA reporting. Recommendation - We recommend the City implement adequate controls to ensure subrecipient agreements included all the required elements, as outlined under 2 CFR 200.332 a)(1). Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - The City has implemented a process to ensure that all subrecipient agreements contain the federal ALN, as required by 2 CFR 200.332. All subrecipient agreements will include a new exhibit as an attachment in the agreement that will include the ALN and any other required grant elements.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 21.027, Department of Treasury, COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund (CSLFRF) Federal Award Identification Number and Year - N/A Pass-through Entity - N/A Finding Type - Significant deficiency and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - Per 2 CFR 200.332 (a), all pass-through entities must ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the following information at the time of the subaward and, if any of these data elements change, include the changes in subsequent subaward modification. When some of this information is not available, the pass-through entity must provide the best information available to describe the federal award and subaward. Required information includes the following: (1) Federal award identification (i) Subrecipient name (which must match the name associated with its unique entity identifier) (ii) Subrecipient's unique entity identifier (iii) Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN) (iv) Federal award date (see the definition of federal award date in ? 200.1 of this part) of award to the recipient by the federal agency (v) Subaward period of performance start and end date (vi) Subaward budget period start and end date (vii) Amount of federal funds obligated by this action by the pass-through entity to the subrecipient (viii) Total amount of federal funds obligated to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity, including the current financial obligation (ix) Total amount of the federal award committed to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity (x) Federal award project description, as required to be responsive to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) (xi) Name of federal awarding agency, pass-through entity, and contact information for awarding official of the pass-through entity (xii) Assistance Listing Numbers and title; the pass-through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each federal award and the Assistance Listing Numbers at time of disbursement (xiii) Identification of whether the award is R&D (xiv) Indirect cost rate for the federal award (including if the de minimis rate is charged) per ? 200.414 Condition - The CSLFRF subrecipient agreements did not include the CSLFRF assistance Listing Number (ALN), as required per 2 CFR 200.332 (a)(1)(xii). Questioned Costs - None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - During the fiscal year, the City passed through CSLFRF funding to three subrecipients. The agreements with the subrecipients included a reference to the applicable regulations provided by the Treasury and all the elements outlined under 2 CFR 200.331 (a)(1) with the exception of the ALN. Cause and Effect - The City?s controls did not ensure that the subrecipient agreements included all the required elements, as outlined under 2 CFR 200.332 (a)(1). The lack of information could result in noncompliance by the subrecipient, as well as incorrect SEFA reporting. Recommendation - We recommend the City implement adequate controls to ensure subrecipient agreements included all the required elements, as outlined under 2 CFR 200.332 a)(1). Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - The City has implemented a process to ensure that all subrecipient agreements contain the federal ALN, as required by 2 CFR 200.332. All subrecipient agreements will include a new exhibit as an attachment in the agreement that will include the ALN and any other required grant elements.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 21.027, Department of Treasury, COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund (CSLFRF) Federal Award Identification Number and Year - N/A Pass-through Entity - N/A Finding Type - Significant deficiency and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - Per 2 CFR 200.332 (a), all pass-through entities must ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the following information at the time of the subaward and, if any of these data elements change, include the changes in subsequent subaward modification. When some of this information is not available, the pass-through entity must provide the best information available to describe the federal award and subaward. Required information includes the following: (1) Federal award identification (i) Subrecipient name (which must match the name associated with its unique entity identifier) (ii) Subrecipient's unique entity identifier (iii) Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN) (iv) Federal award date (see the definition of federal award date in ? 200.1 of this part) of award to the recipient by the federal agency (v) Subaward period of performance start and end date (vi) Subaward budget period start and end date (vii) Amount of federal funds obligated by this action by the pass-through entity to the subrecipient (viii) Total amount of federal funds obligated to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity, including the current financial obligation (ix) Total amount of the federal award committed to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity (x) Federal award project description, as required to be responsive to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) (xi) Name of federal awarding agency, pass-through entity, and contact information for awarding official of the pass-through entity (xii) Assistance Listing Numbers and title; the pass-through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each federal award and the Assistance Listing Numbers at time of disbursement (xiii) Identification of whether the award is R&D (xiv) Indirect cost rate for the federal award (including if the de minimis rate is charged) per ? 200.414 Condition - The CSLFRF subrecipient agreements did not include the CSLFRF assistance Listing Number (ALN), as required per 2 CFR 200.332 (a)(1)(xii). Questioned Costs - None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - During the fiscal year, the City passed through CSLFRF funding to three subrecipients. The agreements with the subrecipients included a reference to the applicable regulations provided by the Treasury and all the elements outlined under 2 CFR 200.331 (a)(1) with the exception of the ALN. Cause and Effect - The City?s controls did not ensure that the subrecipient agreements included all the required elements, as outlined under 2 CFR 200.332 (a)(1). The lack of information could result in noncompliance by the subrecipient, as well as incorrect SEFA reporting. Recommendation - We recommend the City implement adequate controls to ensure subrecipient agreements included all the required elements, as outlined under 2 CFR 200.332 a)(1). Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - The City has implemented a process to ensure that all subrecipient agreements contain the federal ALN, as required by 2 CFR 200.332. All subrecipient agreements will include a new exhibit as an attachment in the agreement that will include the ALN and any other required grant elements.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 21.027, Department of Treasury, COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund (CSLFRF) Federal Award Identification Number and Year - N/A Pass-through Entity - N/A Finding Type - Significant deficiency and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - Per 2 CFR 200.332 (a), all pass-through entities must ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the following information at the time of the subaward and, if any of these data elements change, include the changes in subsequent subaward modification. When some of this information is not available, the pass-through entity must provide the best information available to describe the federal award and subaward. Required information includes the following: (1) Federal award identification (i) Subrecipient name (which must match the name associated with its unique entity identifier) (ii) Subrecipient's unique entity identifier (iii) Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN) (iv) Federal award date (see the definition of federal award date in ? 200.1 of this part) of award to the recipient by the federal agency (v) Subaward period of performance start and end date (vi) Subaward budget period start and end date (vii) Amount of federal funds obligated by this action by the pass-through entity to the subrecipient (viii) Total amount of federal funds obligated to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity, including the current financial obligation (ix) Total amount of the federal award committed to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity (x) Federal award project description, as required to be responsive to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) (xi) Name of federal awarding agency, pass-through entity, and contact information for awarding official of the pass-through entity (xii) Assistance Listing Numbers and title; the pass-through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each federal award and the Assistance Listing Numbers at time of disbursement (xiii) Identification of whether the award is R&D (xiv) Indirect cost rate for the federal award (including if the de minimis rate is charged) per ? 200.414 Condition - The CSLFRF subrecipient agreements did not include the CSLFRF assistance Listing Number (ALN), as required per 2 CFR 200.332 (a)(1)(xii). Questioned Costs - None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - During the fiscal year, the City passed through CSLFRF funding to three subrecipients. The agreements with the subrecipients included a reference to the applicable regulations provided by the Treasury and all the elements outlined under 2 CFR 200.331 (a)(1) with the exception of the ALN. Cause and Effect - The City?s controls did not ensure that the subrecipient agreements included all the required elements, as outlined under 2 CFR 200.332 (a)(1). The lack of information could result in noncompliance by the subrecipient, as well as incorrect SEFA reporting. Recommendation - We recommend the City implement adequate controls to ensure subrecipient agreements included all the required elements, as outlined under 2 CFR 200.332 a)(1). Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - The City has implemented a process to ensure that all subrecipient agreements contain the federal ALN, as required by 2 CFR 200.332. All subrecipient agreements will include a new exhibit as an attachment in the agreement that will include the ALN and any other required grant elements.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 21.027, Department of Treasury, COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund (CSLFRF) Federal Award Identification Number and Year - N/A Pass-through Entity - N/A Finding Type - Significant deficiency and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - Per 2 CFR 200.332 (a), all pass-through entities must ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the following information at the time of the subaward and, if any of these data elements change, include the changes in subsequent subaward modification. When some of this information is not available, the pass-through entity must provide the best information available to describe the federal award and subaward. Required information includes the following: (1) Federal award identification (i) Subrecipient name (which must match the name associated with its unique entity identifier) (ii) Subrecipient's unique entity identifier (iii) Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN) (iv) Federal award date (see the definition of federal award date in ? 200.1 of this part) of award to the recipient by the federal agency (v) Subaward period of performance start and end date (vi) Subaward budget period start and end date (vii) Amount of federal funds obligated by this action by the pass-through entity to the subrecipient (viii) Total amount of federal funds obligated to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity, including the current financial obligation (ix) Total amount of the federal award committed to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity (x) Federal award project description, as required to be responsive to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) (xi) Name of federal awarding agency, pass-through entity, and contact information for awarding official of the pass-through entity (xii) Assistance Listing Numbers and title; the pass-through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each federal award and the Assistance Listing Numbers at time of disbursement (xiii) Identification of whether the award is R&D (xiv) Indirect cost rate for the federal award (including if the de minimis rate is charged) per ? 200.414 Condition - The CSLFRF subrecipient agreements did not include the CSLFRF assistance Listing Number (ALN), as required per 2 CFR 200.332 (a)(1)(xii). Questioned Costs - None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - During the fiscal year, the City passed through CSLFRF funding to three subrecipients. The agreements with the subrecipients included a reference to the applicable regulations provided by the Treasury and all the elements outlined under 2 CFR 200.331 (a)(1) with the exception of the ALN. Cause and Effect - The City?s controls did not ensure that the subrecipient agreements included all the required elements, as outlined under 2 CFR 200.332 (a)(1). The lack of information could result in noncompliance by the subrecipient, as well as incorrect SEFA reporting. Recommendation - We recommend the City implement adequate controls to ensure subrecipient agreements included all the required elements, as outlined under 2 CFR 200.332 a)(1). Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - The City has implemented a process to ensure that all subrecipient agreements contain the federal ALN, as required by 2 CFR 200.332. All subrecipient agreements will include a new exhibit as an attachment in the agreement that will include the ALN and any other required grant elements.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 21.027, Department of Treasury, COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund (CSLFRF) Federal Award Identification Number and Year - N/A Pass-through Entity - N/A Finding Type - Significant deficiency and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - Per 2 CFR 200.332 (a), all pass-through entities must ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the following information at the time of the subaward and, if any of these data elements change, include the changes in subsequent subaward modification. When some of this information is not available, the pass-through entity must provide the best information available to describe the federal award and subaward. Required information includes the following: (1) Federal award identification (i) Subrecipient name (which must match the name associated with its unique entity identifier) (ii) Subrecipient's unique entity identifier (iii) Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN) (iv) Federal award date (see the definition of federal award date in ? 200.1 of this part) of award to the recipient by the federal agency (v) Subaward period of performance start and end date (vi) Subaward budget period start and end date (vii) Amount of federal funds obligated by this action by the pass-through entity to the subrecipient (viii) Total amount of federal funds obligated to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity, including the current financial obligation (ix) Total amount of the federal award committed to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity (x) Federal award project description, as required to be responsive to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) (xi) Name of federal awarding agency, pass-through entity, and contact information for awarding official of the pass-through entity (xii) Assistance Listing Numbers and title; the pass-through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each federal award and the Assistance Listing Numbers at time of disbursement (xiii) Identification of whether the award is R&D (xiv) Indirect cost rate for the federal award (including if the de minimis rate is charged) per ? 200.414 Condition - The CSLFRF subrecipient agreements did not include the CSLFRF assistance Listing Number (ALN), as required per 2 CFR 200.332 (a)(1)(xii). Questioned Costs - None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - During the fiscal year, the City passed through CSLFRF funding to three subrecipients. The agreements with the subrecipients included a reference to the applicable regulations provided by the Treasury and all the elements outlined under 2 CFR 200.331 (a)(1) with the exception of the ALN. Cause and Effect - The City?s controls did not ensure that the subrecipient agreements included all the required elements, as outlined under 2 CFR 200.332 (a)(1). The lack of information could result in noncompliance by the subrecipient, as well as incorrect SEFA reporting. Recommendation - We recommend the City implement adequate controls to ensure subrecipient agreements included all the required elements, as outlined under 2 CFR 200.332 a)(1). Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - The City has implemented a process to ensure that all subrecipient agreements contain the federal ALN, as required by 2 CFR 200.332. All subrecipient agreements will include a new exhibit as an attachment in the agreement that will include the ALN and any other required grant elements.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 21.027, Department of Treasury, COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund (CSLFRF) Federal Award Identification Number and Year - N/A Pass-through Entity - N/A Finding Type - Significant deficiency and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - Per 2 CFR 200.332 (a), all pass-through entities must ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the following information at the time of the subaward and, if any of these data elements change, include the changes in subsequent subaward modification. When some of this information is not available, the pass-through entity must provide the best information available to describe the federal award and subaward. Required information includes the following: (1) Federal award identification (i) Subrecipient name (which must match the name associated with its unique entity identifier) (ii) Subrecipient's unique entity identifier (iii) Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN) (iv) Federal award date (see the definition of federal award date in ? 200.1 of this part) of award to the recipient by the federal agency (v) Subaward period of performance start and end date (vi) Subaward budget period start and end date (vii) Amount of federal funds obligated by this action by the pass-through entity to the subrecipient (viii) Total amount of federal funds obligated to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity, including the current financial obligation (ix) Total amount of the federal award committed to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity (x) Federal award project description, as required to be responsive to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) (xi) Name of federal awarding agency, pass-through entity, and contact information for awarding official of the pass-through entity (xii) Assistance Listing Numbers and title; the pass-through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each federal award and the Assistance Listing Numbers at time of disbursement (xiii) Identification of whether the award is R&D (xiv) Indirect cost rate for the federal award (including if the de minimis rate is charged) per ? 200.414 Condition - The CSLFRF subrecipient agreements did not include the CSLFRF assistance Listing Number (ALN), as required per 2 CFR 200.332 (a)(1)(xii). Questioned Costs - None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - During the fiscal year, the City passed through CSLFRF funding to three subrecipients. The agreements with the subrecipients included a reference to the applicable regulations provided by the Treasury and all the elements outlined under 2 CFR 200.331 (a)(1) with the exception of the ALN. Cause and Effect - The City?s controls did not ensure that the subrecipient agreements included all the required elements, as outlined under 2 CFR 200.332 (a)(1). The lack of information could result in noncompliance by the subrecipient, as well as incorrect SEFA reporting. Recommendation - We recommend the City implement adequate controls to ensure subrecipient agreements included all the required elements, as outlined under 2 CFR 200.332 a)(1). Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - The City has implemented a process to ensure that all subrecipient agreements contain the federal ALN, as required by 2 CFR 200.332. All subrecipient agreements will include a new exhibit as an attachment in the agreement that will include the ALN and any other required grant elements.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 21.027, Department of Treasury, COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund (CSLFRF) Federal Award Identification Number and Year - N/A Pass-through Entity - N/A Finding Type - Significant deficiency and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - Per 2 CFR 200.332 (a), all pass-through entities must ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the following information at the time of the subaward and, if any of these data elements change, include the changes in subsequent subaward modification. When some of this information is not available, the pass-through entity must provide the best information available to describe the federal award and subaward. Required information includes the following: (1) Federal award identification (i) Subrecipient name (which must match the name associated with its unique entity identifier) (ii) Subrecipient's unique entity identifier (iii) Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN) (iv) Federal award date (see the definition of federal award date in ? 200.1 of this part) of award to the recipient by the federal agency (v) Subaward period of performance start and end date (vi) Subaward budget period start and end date (vii) Amount of federal funds obligated by this action by the pass-through entity to the subrecipient (viii) Total amount of federal funds obligated to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity, including the current financial obligation (ix) Total amount of the federal award committed to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity (x) Federal award project description, as required to be responsive to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) (xi) Name of federal awarding agency, pass-through entity, and contact information for awarding official of the pass-through entity (xii) Assistance Listing Numbers and title; the pass-through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each federal award and the Assistance Listing Numbers at time of disbursement (xiii) Identification of whether the award is R&D (xiv) Indirect cost rate for the federal award (including if the de minimis rate is charged) per ? 200.414 Condition - The CSLFRF subrecipient agreements did not include the CSLFRF assistance Listing Number (ALN), as required per 2 CFR 200.332 (a)(1)(xii). Questioned Costs - None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - During the fiscal year, the City passed through CSLFRF funding to three subrecipients. The agreements with the subrecipients included a reference to the applicable regulations provided by the Treasury and all the elements outlined under 2 CFR 200.331 (a)(1) with the exception of the ALN. Cause and Effect - The City?s controls did not ensure that the subrecipient agreements included all the required elements, as outlined under 2 CFR 200.332 (a)(1). The lack of information could result in noncompliance by the subrecipient, as well as incorrect SEFA reporting. Recommendation - We recommend the City implement adequate controls to ensure subrecipient agreements included all the required elements, as outlined under 2 CFR 200.332 a)(1). Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - The City has implemented a process to ensure that all subrecipient agreements contain the federal ALN, as required by 2 CFR 200.332. All subrecipient agreements will include a new exhibit as an attachment in the agreement that will include the ALN and any other required grant elements.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 21.027, Department of Treasury, COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund (CSLFRF) Federal Award Identification Number and Year - N/A Pass-through Entity - N/A Finding Type - Significant deficiency and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - Per 2 CFR 200.332 (a), all pass-through entities must ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the following information at the time of the subaward and, if any of these data elements change, include the changes in subsequent subaward modification. When some of this information is not available, the pass-through entity must provide the best information available to describe the federal award and subaward. Required information includes the following: (1) Federal award identification (i) Subrecipient name (which must match the name associated with its unique entity identifier) (ii) Subrecipient's unique entity identifier (iii) Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN) (iv) Federal award date (see the definition of federal award date in ? 200.1 of this part) of award to the recipient by the federal agency (v) Subaward period of performance start and end date (vi) Subaward budget period start and end date (vii) Amount of federal funds obligated by this action by the pass-through entity to the subrecipient (viii) Total amount of federal funds obligated to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity, including the current financial obligation (ix) Total amount of the federal award committed to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity (x) Federal award project description, as required to be responsive to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) (xi) Name of federal awarding agency, pass-through entity, and contact information for awarding official of the pass-through entity (xii) Assistance Listing Numbers and title; the pass-through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each federal award and the Assistance Listing Numbers at time of disbursement (xiii) Identification of whether the award is R&D (xiv) Indirect cost rate for the federal award (including if the de minimis rate is charged) per ? 200.414 Condition - The CSLFRF subrecipient agreements did not include the CSLFRF assistance Listing Number (ALN), as required per 2 CFR 200.332 (a)(1)(xii). Questioned Costs - None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - During the fiscal year, the City passed through CSLFRF funding to three subrecipients. The agreements with the subrecipients included a reference to the applicable regulations provided by the Treasury and all the elements outlined under 2 CFR 200.331 (a)(1) with the exception of the ALN. Cause and Effect - The City?s controls did not ensure that the subrecipient agreements included all the required elements, as outlined under 2 CFR 200.332 (a)(1). The lack of information could result in noncompliance by the subrecipient, as well as incorrect SEFA reporting. Recommendation - We recommend the City implement adequate controls to ensure subrecipient agreements included all the required elements, as outlined under 2 CFR 200.332 a)(1). Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - The City has implemented a process to ensure that all subrecipient agreements contain the federal ALN, as required by 2 CFR 200.332. All subrecipient agreements will include a new exhibit as an attachment in the agreement that will include the ALN and any other required grant elements.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 21.027, Department of Treasury, COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund (CSLFRF) Federal Award Identification Number and Year - N/A Pass-through Entity - N/A Finding Type - Significant deficiency and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - Per 2 CFR 200.332 (a), all pass-through entities must ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the following information at the time of the subaward and, if any of these data elements change, include the changes in subsequent subaward modification. When some of this information is not available, the pass-through entity must provide the best information available to describe the federal award and subaward. Required information includes the following: (1) Federal award identification (i) Subrecipient name (which must match the name associated with its unique entity identifier) (ii) Subrecipient's unique entity identifier (iii) Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN) (iv) Federal award date (see the definition of federal award date in ? 200.1 of this part) of award to the recipient by the federal agency (v) Subaward period of performance start and end date (vi) Subaward budget period start and end date (vii) Amount of federal funds obligated by this action by the pass-through entity to the subrecipient (viii) Total amount of federal funds obligated to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity, including the current financial obligation (ix) Total amount of the federal award committed to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity (x) Federal award project description, as required to be responsive to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) (xi) Name of federal awarding agency, pass-through entity, and contact information for awarding official of the pass-through entity (xii) Assistance Listing Numbers and title; the pass-through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each federal award and the Assistance Listing Numbers at time of disbursement (xiii) Identification of whether the award is R&D (xiv) Indirect cost rate for the federal award (including if the de minimis rate is charged) per ? 200.414 Condition - The CSLFRF subrecipient agreements did not include the CSLFRF assistance Listing Number (ALN), as required per 2 CFR 200.332 (a)(1)(xii). Questioned Costs - None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - During the fiscal year, the City passed through CSLFRF funding to three subrecipients. The agreements with the subrecipients included a reference to the applicable regulations provided by the Treasury and all the elements outlined under 2 CFR 200.331 (a)(1) with the exception of the ALN. Cause and Effect - The City?s controls did not ensure that the subrecipient agreements included all the required elements, as outlined under 2 CFR 200.332 (a)(1). The lack of information could result in noncompliance by the subrecipient, as well as incorrect SEFA reporting. Recommendation - We recommend the City implement adequate controls to ensure subrecipient agreements included all the required elements, as outlined under 2 CFR 200.332 a)(1). Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - The City has implemented a process to ensure that all subrecipient agreements contain the federal ALN, as required by 2 CFR 200.332. All subrecipient agreements will include a new exhibit as an attachment in the agreement that will include the ALN and any other required grant elements.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 21.027, Department of Treasury, COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund (CSLFRF) Federal Award Identification Number and Year - N/A Pass-through Entity - N/A Finding Type - Significant deficiency and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - Per 2 CFR 200.332 (a), all pass-through entities must ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the following information at the time of the subaward and, if any of these data elements change, include the changes in subsequent subaward modification. When some of this information is not available, the pass-through entity must provide the best information available to describe the federal award and subaward. Required information includes the following: (1) Federal award identification (i) Subrecipient name (which must match the name associated with its unique entity identifier) (ii) Subrecipient's unique entity identifier (iii) Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN) (iv) Federal award date (see the definition of federal award date in ? 200.1 of this part) of award to the recipient by the federal agency (v) Subaward period of performance start and end date (vi) Subaward budget period start and end date (vii) Amount of federal funds obligated by this action by the pass-through entity to the subrecipient (viii) Total amount of federal funds obligated to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity, including the current financial obligation (ix) Total amount of the federal award committed to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity (x) Federal award project description, as required to be responsive to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) (xi) Name of federal awarding agency, pass-through entity, and contact information for awarding official of the pass-through entity (xii) Assistance Listing Numbers and title; the pass-through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each federal award and the Assistance Listing Numbers at time of disbursement (xiii) Identification of whether the award is R&D (xiv) Indirect cost rate for the federal award (including if the de minimis rate is charged) per ? 200.414 Condition - The CSLFRF subrecipient agreements did not include the CSLFRF assistance Listing Number (ALN), as required per 2 CFR 200.332 (a)(1)(xii). Questioned Costs - None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - During the fiscal year, the City passed through CSLFRF funding to three subrecipients. The agreements with the subrecipients included a reference to the applicable regulations provided by the Treasury and all the elements outlined under 2 CFR 200.331 (a)(1) with the exception of the ALN. Cause and Effect - The City?s controls did not ensure that the subrecipient agreements included all the required elements, as outlined under 2 CFR 200.332 (a)(1). The lack of information could result in noncompliance by the subrecipient, as well as incorrect SEFA reporting. Recommendation - We recommend the City implement adequate controls to ensure subrecipient agreements included all the required elements, as outlined under 2 CFR 200.332 a)(1). Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - The City has implemented a process to ensure that all subrecipient agreements contain the federal ALN, as required by 2 CFR 200.332. All subrecipient agreements will include a new exhibit as an attachment in the agreement that will include the ALN and any other required grant elements.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 21.027, Department of Treasury, COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund (CSLFRF) Federal Award Identification Number and Year - N/A Pass-through Entity - N/A Finding Type - Significant deficiency and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - Per 2 CFR 200.332 (a), all pass-through entities must ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the following information at the time of the subaward and, if any of these data elements change, include the changes in subsequent subaward modification. When some of this information is not available, the pass-through entity must provide the best information available to describe the federal award and subaward. Required information includes the following: (1) Federal award identification (i) Subrecipient name (which must match the name associated with its unique entity identifier) (ii) Subrecipient's unique entity identifier (iii) Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN) (iv) Federal award date (see the definition of federal award date in ? 200.1 of this part) of award to the recipient by the federal agency (v) Subaward period of performance start and end date (vi) Subaward budget period start and end date (vii) Amount of federal funds obligated by this action by the pass-through entity to the subrecipient (viii) Total amount of federal funds obligated to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity, including the current financial obligation (ix) Total amount of the federal award committed to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity (x) Federal award project description, as required to be responsive to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) (xi) Name of federal awarding agency, pass-through entity, and contact information for awarding official of the pass-through entity (xii) Assistance Listing Numbers and title; the pass-through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each federal award and the Assistance Listing Numbers at time of disbursement (xiii) Identification of whether the award is R&D (xiv) Indirect cost rate for the federal award (including if the de minimis rate is charged) per ? 200.414 Condition - The CSLFRF subrecipient agreements did not include the CSLFRF assistance Listing Number (ALN), as required per 2 CFR 200.332 (a)(1)(xii). Questioned Costs - None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - During the fiscal year, the City passed through CSLFRF funding to three subrecipients. The agreements with the subrecipients included a reference to the applicable regulations provided by the Treasury and all the elements outlined under 2 CFR 200.331 (a)(1) with the exception of the ALN. Cause and Effect - The City?s controls did not ensure that the subrecipient agreements included all the required elements, as outlined under 2 CFR 200.332 (a)(1). The lack of information could result in noncompliance by the subrecipient, as well as incorrect SEFA reporting. Recommendation - We recommend the City implement adequate controls to ensure subrecipient agreements included all the required elements, as outlined under 2 CFR 200.332 a)(1). Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - The City has implemented a process to ensure that all subrecipient agreements contain the federal ALN, as required by 2 CFR 200.332. All subrecipient agreements will include a new exhibit as an attachment in the agreement that will include the ALN and any other required grant elements.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 21.027, Department of Treasury, COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund (CSLFRF) Federal Award Identification Number and Year - N/A Pass-through Entity - N/A Finding Type - Significant deficiency and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - Per 2 CFR 200.332 (a), all pass-through entities must ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the following information at the time of the subaward and, if any of these data elements change, include the changes in subsequent subaward modification. When some of this information is not available, the pass-through entity must provide the best information available to describe the federal award and subaward. Required information includes the following: (1) Federal award identification (i) Subrecipient name (which must match the name associated with its unique entity identifier) (ii) Subrecipient's unique entity identifier (iii) Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN) (iv) Federal award date (see the definition of federal award date in ? 200.1 of this part) of award to the recipient by the federal agency (v) Subaward period of performance start and end date (vi) Subaward budget period start and end date (vii) Amount of federal funds obligated by this action by the pass-through entity to the subrecipient (viii) Total amount of federal funds obligated to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity, including the current financial obligation (ix) Total amount of the federal award committed to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity (x) Federal award project description, as required to be responsive to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) (xi) Name of federal awarding agency, pass-through entity, and contact information for awarding official of the pass-through entity (xii) Assistance Listing Numbers and title; the pass-through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each federal award and the Assistance Listing Numbers at time of disbursement (xiii) Identification of whether the award is R&D (xiv) Indirect cost rate for the federal award (including if the de minimis rate is charged) per ? 200.414 Condition - The CSLFRF subrecipient agreements did not include the CSLFRF assistance Listing Number (ALN), as required per 2 CFR 200.332 (a)(1)(xii). Questioned Costs - None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - During the fiscal year, the City passed through CSLFRF funding to three subrecipients. The agreements with the subrecipients included a reference to the applicable regulations provided by the Treasury and all the elements outlined under 2 CFR 200.331 (a)(1) with the exception of the ALN. Cause and Effect - The City?s controls did not ensure that the subrecipient agreements included all the required elements, as outlined under 2 CFR 200.332 (a)(1). The lack of information could result in noncompliance by the subrecipient, as well as incorrect SEFA reporting. Recommendation - We recommend the City implement adequate controls to ensure subrecipient agreements included all the required elements, as outlined under 2 CFR 200.332 a)(1). Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - The City has implemented a process to ensure that all subrecipient agreements contain the federal ALN, as required by 2 CFR 200.332. All subrecipient agreements will include a new exhibit as an attachment in the agreement that will include the ALN and any other required grant elements.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 21.027, Department of Treasury, COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund (CSLFRF) Federal Award Identification Number and Year - N/A Pass-through Entity - N/A Finding Type - Significant deficiency and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - Per 2 CFR 200.332 (a), all pass-through entities must ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the following information at the time of the subaward and, if any of these data elements change, include the changes in subsequent subaward modification. When some of this information is not available, the pass-through entity must provide the best information available to describe the federal award and subaward. Required information includes the following: (1) Federal award identification (i) Subrecipient name (which must match the name associated with its unique entity identifier) (ii) Subrecipient's unique entity identifier (iii) Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN) (iv) Federal award date (see the definition of federal award date in ? 200.1 of this part) of award to the recipient by the federal agency (v) Subaward period of performance start and end date (vi) Subaward budget period start and end date (vii) Amount of federal funds obligated by this action by the pass-through entity to the subrecipient (viii) Total amount of federal funds obligated to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity, including the current financial obligation (ix) Total amount of the federal award committed to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity (x) Federal award project description, as required to be responsive to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) (xi) Name of federal awarding agency, pass-through entity, and contact information for awarding official of the pass-through entity (xii) Assistance Listing Numbers and title; the pass-through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each federal award and the Assistance Listing Numbers at time of disbursement (xiii) Identification of whether the award is R&D (xiv) Indirect cost rate for the federal award (including if the de minimis rate is charged) per ? 200.414 Condition - The CSLFRF subrecipient agreements did not include the CSLFRF assistance Listing Number (ALN), as required per 2 CFR 200.332 (a)(1)(xii). Questioned Costs - None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - During the fiscal year, the City passed through CSLFRF funding to three subrecipients. The agreements with the subrecipients included a reference to the applicable regulations provided by the Treasury and all the elements outlined under 2 CFR 200.331 (a)(1) with the exception of the ALN. Cause and Effect - The City?s controls did not ensure that the subrecipient agreements included all the required elements, as outlined under 2 CFR 200.332 (a)(1). The lack of information could result in noncompliance by the subrecipient, as well as incorrect SEFA reporting. Recommendation - We recommend the City implement adequate controls to ensure subrecipient agreements included all the required elements, as outlined under 2 CFR 200.332 a)(1). Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - The City has implemented a process to ensure that all subrecipient agreements contain the federal ALN, as required by 2 CFR 200.332. All subrecipient agreements will include a new exhibit as an attachment in the agreement that will include the ALN and any other required grant elements.
Program: Foster Care Federal Financial Assistance Listing Number: 93.658 Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Pass-Through: California Department of Social Services Award No. and Year: 2201CAFOST and 2022, 2101CAFOST and 2021 Compliance Requirements: Subrecipient Monitoring Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Material Noncompliance Criteria: In accordance with Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 200.332, pass-through entities must comply with the following: ? 2 CFR 200.332(d)- Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include the information at 2 CFR 200.332(d)(1) through (4). ? 2 CFR 200.332(f) ? Verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of this part when it is expected that the subrecipient?s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in 200.501. The California Department of Social Services further clarifies in its County Fiscal Letter No. 21/22 ? 115 that Foster Family Agency (FFA), Group Home, and Short Term Residential Therapeutic Programs (STRTP) are ?considered subrecipients and subject to the same audit requirements and require the same degree of oversight as other subrecipients?. Further, while there are some licensing and oversight functions performed by the state over FFAs, group homes, and STRTPs, ?counties are still ultimately responsible for review of these audits and their findings, any follow-up to ensure compliance, and any other form of monitoring and oversight required by federal and state laws and regulations.? Condition: The County did not have any formal controls or procedures in place for subrecipient monitoring for the Foster Care program. Cause: The County did not maintain procedures to monitor the activities of each subrecipient, or verify that every subrecipient is audited, as required. Effect: The County did not maintain policies and procedures to align with the Subrecipient Monitoring requirements in 2 CFR 200.332 and did not comply with subrecipient monitoring requirements related to the program. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs were identified as a result of our procedures. Context/Sampling: A nonstatistical sample of eight (8) out of 53 subrecipients were sampled, which included six (6) FFA, and two (2) STRTP types. The condition noted above was identified during our procedures related to subrecipient monitoring, and was pervasive to the program. Repeat Findings from Prior Years: No. Recommendation: We recommend that the County implement policies and procedures in accordance with 2 CFR 200.332 to ensure compliance with subrecipient monitoring requirements. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees. See separately issued Corrective Action Plan.
Program: Foster Care Federal Financial Assistance Listing Number: 93.658 Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Pass-Through: California Department of Social Services Award No. and Year: 2201CAFOST and 2022, 2101CAFOST and 2021 Compliance Requirements: Subrecipient Monitoring Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Material Noncompliance Criteria: In accordance with Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 200.332, pass-through entities must comply with the following: ? 2 CFR 200.332(d)- Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include the information at 2 CFR 200.332(d)(1) through (4). ? 2 CFR 200.332(f) ? Verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of this part when it is expected that the subrecipient?s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in 200.501. The California Department of Social Services further clarifies in its County Fiscal Letter No. 21/22 ? 115 that Foster Family Agency (FFA), Group Home, and Short Term Residential Therapeutic Programs (STRTP) are ?considered subrecipients and subject to the same audit requirements and require the same degree of oversight as other subrecipients?. Further, while there are some licensing and oversight functions performed by the state over FFAs, group homes, and STRTPs, ?counties are still ultimately responsible for review of these audits and their findings, any follow-up to ensure compliance, and any other form of monitoring and oversight required by federal and state laws and regulations.? Condition: The County did not have any formal controls or procedures in place for subrecipient monitoring for the Foster Care program. Cause: The County did not maintain procedures to monitor the activities of each subrecipient, or verify that every subrecipient is audited, as required. Effect: The County did not maintain policies and procedures to align with the Subrecipient Monitoring requirements in 2 CFR 200.332 and did not comply with subrecipient monitoring requirements related to the program. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs were identified as a result of our procedures. Context/Sampling: A nonstatistical sample of eight (8) out of 53 subrecipients were sampled, which included six (6) FFA, and two (2) STRTP types. The condition noted above was identified during our procedures related to subrecipient monitoring, and was pervasive to the program. Repeat Findings from Prior Years: No. Recommendation: We recommend that the County implement policies and procedures in accordance with 2 CFR 200.332 to ensure compliance with subrecipient monitoring requirements. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees. See separately issued Corrective Action Plan.
Program: Foster Care Federal Financial Assistance Listing Number: 93.658 Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Pass-Through: California Department of Social Services Award No. and Year: 2201CAFOST and 2022, 2101CAFOST and 2021 Compliance Requirements: Subrecipient Monitoring Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Material Noncompliance Criteria: In accordance with Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 200.332, pass-through entities must comply with the following: ? 2 CFR 200.332(d)- Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include the information at 2 CFR 200.332(d)(1) through (4). ? 2 CFR 200.332(f) ? Verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of this part when it is expected that the subrecipient?s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in 200.501. The California Department of Social Services further clarifies in its County Fiscal Letter No. 21/22 ? 115 that Foster Family Agency (FFA), Group Home, and Short Term Residential Therapeutic Programs (STRTP) are ?considered subrecipients and subject to the same audit requirements and require the same degree of oversight as other subrecipients?. Further, while there are some licensing and oversight functions performed by the state over FFAs, group homes, and STRTPs, ?counties are still ultimately responsible for review of these audits and their findings, any follow-up to ensure compliance, and any other form of monitoring and oversight required by federal and state laws and regulations.? Condition: The County did not have any formal controls or procedures in place for subrecipient monitoring for the Foster Care program. Cause: The County did not maintain procedures to monitor the activities of each subrecipient, or verify that every subrecipient is audited, as required. Effect: The County did not maintain policies and procedures to align with the Subrecipient Monitoring requirements in 2 CFR 200.332 and did not comply with subrecipient monitoring requirements related to the program. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs were identified as a result of our procedures. Context/Sampling: A nonstatistical sample of eight (8) out of 53 subrecipients were sampled, which included six (6) FFA, and two (2) STRTP types. The condition noted above was identified during our procedures related to subrecipient monitoring, and was pervasive to the program. Repeat Findings from Prior Years: No. Recommendation: We recommend that the County implement policies and procedures in accordance with 2 CFR 200.332 to ensure compliance with subrecipient monitoring requirements. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees. See separately issued Corrective Action Plan.
Program: Foster Care Federal Financial Assistance Listing Number: 93.658 Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Pass-Through: California Department of Social Services Award No. and Year: 2201CAFOST and 2022, 2101CAFOST and 2021 Compliance Requirements: Subrecipient Monitoring Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Material Noncompliance Criteria: In accordance with Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 200.332, pass-through entities must comply with the following: ? 2 CFR 200.332(d)- Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include the information at 2 CFR 200.332(d)(1) through (4). ? 2 CFR 200.332(f) ? Verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of this part when it is expected that the subrecipient?s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in 200.501. The California Department of Social Services further clarifies in its County Fiscal Letter No. 21/22 ? 115 that Foster Family Agency (FFA), Group Home, and Short Term Residential Therapeutic Programs (STRTP) are ?considered subrecipients and subject to the same audit requirements and require the same degree of oversight as other subrecipients?. Further, while there are some licensing and oversight functions performed by the state over FFAs, group homes, and STRTPs, ?counties are still ultimately responsible for review of these audits and their findings, any follow-up to ensure compliance, and any other form of monitoring and oversight required by federal and state laws and regulations.? Condition: The County did not have any formal controls or procedures in place for subrecipient monitoring for the Foster Care program. Cause: The County did not maintain procedures to monitor the activities of each subrecipient, or verify that every subrecipient is audited, as required. Effect: The County did not maintain policies and procedures to align with the Subrecipient Monitoring requirements in 2 CFR 200.332 and did not comply with subrecipient monitoring requirements related to the program. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs were identified as a result of our procedures. Context/Sampling: A nonstatistical sample of eight (8) out of 53 subrecipients were sampled, which included six (6) FFA, and two (2) STRTP types. The condition noted above was identified during our procedures related to subrecipient monitoring, and was pervasive to the program. Repeat Findings from Prior Years: No. Recommendation: We recommend that the County implement policies and procedures in accordance with 2 CFR 200.332 to ensure compliance with subrecipient monitoring requirements. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees. See separately issued Corrective Action Plan.
Program: Foster Care Federal Financial Assistance Listing Number: 93.658 Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Pass-Through: California Department of Social Services Award No. and Year: 2201CAFOST and 2022, 2101CAFOST and 2021 Compliance Requirements: Subrecipient Monitoring Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Material Noncompliance Criteria: In accordance with Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 200.332, pass-through entities must comply with the following: ? 2 CFR 200.332(d)- Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include the information at 2 CFR 200.332(d)(1) through (4). ? 2 CFR 200.332(f) ? Verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of this part when it is expected that the subrecipient?s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in 200.501. The California Department of Social Services further clarifies in its County Fiscal Letter No. 21/22 ? 115 that Foster Family Agency (FFA), Group Home, and Short Term Residential Therapeutic Programs (STRTP) are ?considered subrecipients and subject to the same audit requirements and require the same degree of oversight as other subrecipients?. Further, while there are some licensing and oversight functions performed by the state over FFAs, group homes, and STRTPs, ?counties are still ultimately responsible for review of these audits and their findings, any follow-up to ensure compliance, and any other form of monitoring and oversight required by federal and state laws and regulations.? Condition: The County did not have any formal controls or procedures in place for subrecipient monitoring for the Foster Care program. Cause: The County did not maintain procedures to monitor the activities of each subrecipient, or verify that every subrecipient is audited, as required. Effect: The County did not maintain policies and procedures to align with the Subrecipient Monitoring requirements in 2 CFR 200.332 and did not comply with subrecipient monitoring requirements related to the program. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs were identified as a result of our procedures. Context/Sampling: A nonstatistical sample of eight (8) out of 53 subrecipients were sampled, which included six (6) FFA, and two (2) STRTP types. The condition noted above was identified during our procedures related to subrecipient monitoring, and was pervasive to the program. Repeat Findings from Prior Years: No. Recommendation: We recommend that the County implement policies and procedures in accordance with 2 CFR 200.332 to ensure compliance with subrecipient monitoring requirements. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees. See separately issued Corrective Action Plan.
Program: Homeland Security Grant Program Federal Financial Assistance Listing Number: 97.067 Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Homeland Security Passed-Through: California Office of Emergency Services Award No. and Year: 2019-0035 and 2020; 2020-0095 and 2021 Compliance Requirements: Subrecipient Monitoring Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control and Instance of Noncompliance Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.332(b), Requirements for Pass-Through Entities, states that all pass-through entities must evaluate each subrecipient?s risk of noncompliance with Federal statues, regulations and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purpose of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring. Condition: During our testing of Homeland Security Grant Program (HSGP) of the Sheriff-Coroner department?s provisions for evaluating subrecipient?s risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations and the terms and conditions of the subaward, we noted for two (2) of two (2) subrecipients selected, the required evaluation of the subrecipient?s risk of noncompliance was not documented. Further, onsite reviews were not performed. Cause: The Sheriff-Coroner department did not adhere to established policies and procedures relating to documentation of the risk assessment when a subrecipient contract is awarded. With respect to onsite reviews, these were not performed due to COVID restrictions. Effect: There is an increased risk that the monitoring procedures performed may not address the subrecipient?s risk of noncompliance. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs were identified as a result of our procedures. Context/Sampling: The entire population of two (2) subrecipients were selected for subrecipient monitoring testing from the Sheriff-Coroner department for the Homeland Security Grant Program. Repeat Finding from Prior Years: No. Recommendation: We recommend that the Sheriff-Coroner department follow the implemented policies and procedures to ensure that the required evaluation of the subrecipient?s risk of noncompliance be documented in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.332(b). Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees. See separately issued Corrective Action Plan.
Program: Homeland Security Grant Program Federal Financial Assistance Listing Number: 97.067 Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Homeland Security Passed-Through: California Office of Emergency Services Award No. and Year: 2019-0035 and 2020; 2020-0095 and 2021 Compliance Requirements: Subrecipient Monitoring Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control and Instance of Noncompliance Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.332(b), Requirements for Pass-Through Entities, states that all pass-through entities must evaluate each subrecipient?s risk of noncompliance with Federal statues, regulations and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purpose of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring. Condition: During our testing of Homeland Security Grant Program (HSGP) of the Sheriff-Coroner department?s provisions for evaluating subrecipient?s risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations and the terms and conditions of the subaward, we noted for two (2) of two (2) subrecipients selected, the required evaluation of the subrecipient?s risk of noncompliance was not documented. Further, onsite reviews were not performed. Cause: The Sheriff-Coroner department did not adhere to established policies and procedures relating to documentation of the risk assessment when a subrecipient contract is awarded. With respect to onsite reviews, these were not performed due to COVID restrictions. Effect: There is an increased risk that the monitoring procedures performed may not address the subrecipient?s risk of noncompliance. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs were identified as a result of our procedures. Context/Sampling: The entire population of two (2) subrecipients were selected for subrecipient monitoring testing from the Sheriff-Coroner department for the Homeland Security Grant Program. Repeat Finding from Prior Years: No. Recommendation: We recommend that the Sheriff-Coroner department follow the implemented policies and procedures to ensure that the required evaluation of the subrecipient?s risk of noncompliance be documented in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.332(b). Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees. See separately issued Corrective Action Plan.
Program: Homeland Security Grant Program Federal Financial Assistance Listing Number: 97.067 Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Homeland Security Passed-Through: California Office of Emergency Services Award No. and Year: 2019-0035 and 2020; 2020-0095 and 2021 Compliance Requirements: Subrecipient Monitoring Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control and Instance of Noncompliance Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.332(b), Requirements for Pass-Through Entities, states that all pass-through entities must evaluate each subrecipient?s risk of noncompliance with Federal statues, regulations and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purpose of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring. Condition: During our testing of Homeland Security Grant Program (HSGP) of the Sheriff-Coroner department?s provisions for evaluating subrecipient?s risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations and the terms and conditions of the subaward, we noted for two (2) of two (2) subrecipients selected, the required evaluation of the subrecipient?s risk of noncompliance was not documented. Further, onsite reviews were not performed. Cause: The Sheriff-Coroner department did not adhere to established policies and procedures relating to documentation of the risk assessment when a subrecipient contract is awarded. With respect to onsite reviews, these were not performed due to COVID restrictions. Effect: There is an increased risk that the monitoring procedures performed may not address the subrecipient?s risk of noncompliance. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs were identified as a result of our procedures. Context/Sampling: The entire population of two (2) subrecipients were selected for subrecipient monitoring testing from the Sheriff-Coroner department for the Homeland Security Grant Program. Repeat Finding from Prior Years: No. Recommendation: We recommend that the Sheriff-Coroner department follow the implemented policies and procedures to ensure that the required evaluation of the subrecipient?s risk of noncompliance be documented in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.332(b). Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees. See separately issued Corrective Action Plan.
Program: Homeland Security Grant Program Federal Financial Assistance Listing Number: 97.067 Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Homeland Security Passed-Through: California Office of Emergency Services Award No. and Year: 2019-0035 and 2020; 2020-0095 and 2021 Compliance Requirements: Subrecipient Monitoring Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control and Instance of Noncompliance Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.332(b), Requirements for Pass-Through Entities, states that all pass-through entities must evaluate each subrecipient?s risk of noncompliance with Federal statues, regulations and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purpose of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring. Condition: During our testing of Homeland Security Grant Program (HSGP) of the Sheriff-Coroner department?s provisions for evaluating subrecipient?s risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations and the terms and conditions of the subaward, we noted for two (2) of two (2) subrecipients selected, the required evaluation of the subrecipient?s risk of noncompliance was not documented. Further, onsite reviews were not performed. Cause: The Sheriff-Coroner department did not adhere to established policies and procedures relating to documentation of the risk assessment when a subrecipient contract is awarded. With respect to onsite reviews, these were not performed due to COVID restrictions. Effect: There is an increased risk that the monitoring procedures performed may not address the subrecipient?s risk of noncompliance. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs were identified as a result of our procedures. Context/Sampling: The entire population of two (2) subrecipients were selected for subrecipient monitoring testing from the Sheriff-Coroner department for the Homeland Security Grant Program. Repeat Finding from Prior Years: No. Recommendation: We recommend that the Sheriff-Coroner department follow the implemented policies and procedures to ensure that the required evaluation of the subrecipient?s risk of noncompliance be documented in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.332(b). Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees. See separately issued Corrective Action Plan.
Program: Homeland Security Grant Program Federal Financial Assistance Listing Number: 97.067 Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Homeland Security Passed-Through: California Office of Emergency Services Award No. and Year: 2019-0035 and 2020; 2020-0095 and 2021 Compliance Requirements: Subrecipient Monitoring Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control and Instance of Noncompliance Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.332(b), Requirements for Pass-Through Entities, states that all pass-through entities must evaluate each subrecipient?s risk of noncompliance with Federal statues, regulations and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purpose of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring. Condition: During our testing of Homeland Security Grant Program (HSGP) of the Sheriff-Coroner department?s provisions for evaluating subrecipient?s risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations and the terms and conditions of the subaward, we noted for two (2) of two (2) subrecipients selected, the required evaluation of the subrecipient?s risk of noncompliance was not documented. Further, onsite reviews were not performed. Cause: The Sheriff-Coroner department did not adhere to established policies and procedures relating to documentation of the risk assessment when a subrecipient contract is awarded. With respect to onsite reviews, these were not performed due to COVID restrictions. Effect: There is an increased risk that the monitoring procedures performed may not address the subrecipient?s risk of noncompliance. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs were identified as a result of our procedures. Context/Sampling: The entire population of two (2) subrecipients were selected for subrecipient monitoring testing from the Sheriff-Coroner department for the Homeland Security Grant Program. Repeat Finding from Prior Years: No. Recommendation: We recommend that the Sheriff-Coroner department follow the implemented policies and procedures to ensure that the required evaluation of the subrecipient?s risk of noncompliance be documented in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.332(b). Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees. See separately issued Corrective Action Plan.