Reference Number: 2023-001 – Material Weakness, Subrecipient Monitoring Criteria: According to 2 CFR sections 200.332 (d) through (f) pass through entities must monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward and achieves performance goals. Condition: During the contract period between August 1, 2022 through September 30, 2023, the Boards subrecipient over enrolled program participants which required the Board to utilize $5,737,560 of 2024 fiscal year CCS program funds to cover 2023 fiscal year obligations. Cause: The Board has weekly check in meeting with its subrecipient to discuss programmatic goals and results. The subrecipient was directed to continue enrolling program participants however, the budget for the continued enrollment had been exceeded and not identified in a timely manner to the program function. Continued enrollment resulted in grant funds being depleted. The Board sought approval from its funder to use fiscal 2024 funds to cover expenditures already incurred. Over enrollment began in March of 2023 and was not closed until July of 2023. Furthermore, the Board relies on an independent accounting firm to perform agreed upon procedures for fiscal monitoring. These procedures occurred once during the fiscal as of December 6, 2023. The Board did not conduct any additional fiscal monitoring throughout the year. Effect: The Board did not effectively monitor the budget of its subrecipient, in a timely manner. As a result, its subrecipient over enrolled program participants. The Texas Workforce Commission subsequently reduced the FY 24 award to supplement the FY23 award to account for the over expenditure. Recommendation: We recommend that the Board improve policies and procedures to ensure communication identifies available funding for program services provided in a timely and efficient manner to the program providers. With respect to monitoring of its subrecipients, policies and procedures should be enhanced to ensure that oversight of its subrecipients is more frequent, timely and responsive to findings. Management Response: See management’s corrective action plan.
Reference Number: 2023-001 – Material Weakness, Subrecipient Monitoring Criteria: According to 2 CFR sections 200.332 (d) through (f) pass through entities must monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward and achieves performance goals. Condition: During the contract period between August 1, 2022 through September 30, 2023, the Boards subrecipient over enrolled program participants which required the Board to utilize $5,737,560 of 2024 fiscal year CCS program funds to cover 2023 fiscal year obligations. Cause: The Board has weekly check in meeting with its subrecipient to discuss programmatic goals and results. The subrecipient was directed to continue enrolling program participants however, the budget for the continued enrollment had been exceeded and not identified in a timely manner to the program function. Continued enrollment resulted in grant funds being depleted. The Board sought approval from its funder to use fiscal 2024 funds to cover expenditures already incurred. Over enrollment began in March of 2023 and was not closed until July of 2023. Furthermore, the Board relies on an independent accounting firm to perform agreed upon procedures for fiscal monitoring. These procedures occurred once during the fiscal as of December 6, 2023. The Board did not conduct any additional fiscal monitoring throughout the year. Effect: The Board did not effectively monitor the budget of its subrecipient, in a timely manner. As a result, its subrecipient over enrolled program participants. The Texas Workforce Commission subsequently reduced the FY 24 award to supplement the FY23 award to account for the over expenditure. Recommendation: We recommend that the Board improve policies and procedures to ensure communication identifies available funding for program services provided in a timely and efficient manner to the program providers. With respect to monitoring of its subrecipients, policies and procedures should be enhanced to ensure that oversight of its subrecipients is more frequent, timely and responsive to findings. Management Response: See management’s corrective action plan.
Reference Number: 2023-002 – Significant Deficiency, Subrecipient Monitoring Criteria: Pass through entities must clearly identify to the subrecipient: (1) the award as a subaward at the time of subaward (or subsequent subaward modification) by providing the information described in 2 CFR section 200.332(a)(1); (2) all requirements imposed by the PTE on the subrecipient so that the federal award is used in accordance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award (2 CFR section 200.332(a)(2)); and (3) any additional requirements that the PTE imposes on the subrecipient in order for the PTE to meet its own responsibility for the federal award (e.g., financial, performance, and special reports) (2 CFR section 200.332(a)(3)). Condition: The contracts between the Board and its subrecipients did not include all the required elements as prescribed by 2 CFR Section 200.332. Cause: The Board did not segregate the source of funds between federal and state sources in a timely manner. As a result, the subrecipient did not have timely information of federal Uniform Guidance and Texas Grant Management Standards requirements. Effect: The Boards subrecipients may not have timely or accurate information to determine the source of federal vs state funding to segregate funds in accordance with the Uniform Guidance and Texas Grant Management Standards. Management Response: See management’s corrective action plan.
Reference Number: 2023-002 – Significant Deficiency, Subrecipient Monitoring Criteria: Pass through entities must clearly identify to the subrecipient: (1) the award as a subaward at the time of subaward (or subsequent subaward modification) by providing the information described in 2 CFR section 200.332(a)(1); (2) all requirements imposed by the PTE on the subrecipient so that the federal award is used in accordance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award (2 CFR section 200.332(a)(2)); and (3) any additional requirements that the PTE imposes on the subrecipient in order for the PTE to meet its own responsibility for the federal award (e.g., financial, performance, and special reports) (2 CFR section 200.332(a)(3)). Condition: The contracts between the Board and its subrecipients did not include all the required elements as prescribed by 2 CFR Section 200.332. Cause: The Board did not segregate the source of funds between federal and state sources in a timely manner. As a result, the subrecipient did not have timely information of federal Uniform Guidance and Texas Grant Management Standards requirements. Effect: The Boards subrecipients may not have timely or accurate information to determine the source of federal vs state funding to segregate funds in accordance with the Uniform Guidance and Texas Grant Management Standards. Management Response: See management’s corrective action plan.
Reference Number: 2023-002 – Significant Deficiency, Subrecipient Monitoring Criteria: Pass through entities must clearly identify to the subrecipient: (1) the award as a subaward at the time of subaward (or subsequent subaward modification) by providing the information described in 2 CFR section 200.332(a)(1); (2) all requirements imposed by the PTE on the subrecipient so that the federal award is used in accordance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award (2 CFR section 200.332(a)(2)); and (3) any additional requirements that the PTE imposes on the subrecipient in order for the PTE to meet its own responsibility for the federal award (e.g., financial, performance, and special reports) (2 CFR section 200.332(a)(3)). Condition: The contracts between the Board and its subrecipients did not include all the required elements as prescribed by 2 CFR Section 200.332. Cause: The Board did not segregate the source of funds between federal and state sources in a timely manner. As a result, the subrecipient did not have timely information of federal Uniform Guidance and Texas Grant Management Standards requirements. Effect: The Boards subrecipients may not have timely or accurate information to determine the source of federal vs state funding to segregate funds in accordance with the Uniform Guidance and Texas Grant Management Standards. Management Response: See management’s corrective action plan.
Reference Number: 2023-002 – Significant Deficiency, Subrecipient Monitoring Criteria: Pass through entities must clearly identify to the subrecipient: (1) the award as a subaward at the time of subaward (or subsequent subaward modification) by providing the information described in 2 CFR section 200.332(a)(1); (2) all requirements imposed by the PTE on the subrecipient so that the federal award is used in accordance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award (2 CFR section 200.332(a)(2)); and (3) any additional requirements that the PTE imposes on the subrecipient in order for the PTE to meet its own responsibility for the federal award (e.g., financial, performance, and special reports) (2 CFR section 200.332(a)(3)). Condition: The contracts between the Board and its subrecipients did not include all the required elements as prescribed by 2 CFR Section 200.332. Cause: The Board did not segregate the source of funds between federal and state sources in a timely manner. As a result, the subrecipient did not have timely information of federal Uniform Guidance and Texas Grant Management Standards requirements. Effect: The Boards subrecipients may not have timely or accurate information to determine the source of federal vs state funding to segregate funds in accordance with the Uniform Guidance and Texas Grant Management Standards. Management Response: See management’s corrective action plan.
Reference Number: 2023-002 – Significant Deficiency, Subrecipient Monitoring Criteria: Pass through entities must clearly identify to the subrecipient: (1) the award as a subaward at the time of subaward (or subsequent subaward modification) by providing the information described in 2 CFR section 200.332(a)(1); (2) all requirements imposed by the PTE on the subrecipient so that the federal award is used in accordance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award (2 CFR section 200.332(a)(2)); and (3) any additional requirements that the PTE imposes on the subrecipient in order for the PTE to meet its own responsibility for the federal award (e.g., financial, performance, and special reports) (2 CFR section 200.332(a)(3)). Condition: The contracts between the Board and its subrecipients did not include all the required elements as prescribed by 2 CFR Section 200.332. Cause: The Board did not segregate the source of funds between federal and state sources in a timely manner. As a result, the subrecipient did not have timely information of federal Uniform Guidance and Texas Grant Management Standards requirements. Effect: The Boards subrecipients may not have timely or accurate information to determine the source of federal vs state funding to segregate funds in accordance with the Uniform Guidance and Texas Grant Management Standards. Management Response: See management’s corrective action plan.
Reference Number: 2023-002 – Significant Deficiency, Subrecipient Monitoring Criteria: Pass through entities must clearly identify to the subrecipient: (1) the award as a subaward at the time of subaward (or subsequent subaward modification) by providing the information described in 2 CFR section 200.332(a)(1); (2) all requirements imposed by the PTE on the subrecipient so that the federal award is used in accordance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award (2 CFR section 200.332(a)(2)); and (3) any additional requirements that the PTE imposes on the subrecipient in order for the PTE to meet its own responsibility for the federal award (e.g., financial, performance, and special reports) (2 CFR section 200.332(a)(3)). Condition: The contracts between the Board and its subrecipients did not include all the required elements as prescribed by 2 CFR Section 200.332. Cause: The Board did not segregate the source of funds between federal and state sources in a timely manner. As a result, the subrecipient did not have timely information of federal Uniform Guidance and Texas Grant Management Standards requirements. Effect: The Boards subrecipients may not have timely or accurate information to determine the source of federal vs state funding to segregate funds in accordance with the Uniform Guidance and Texas Grant Management Standards. Management Response: See management’s corrective action plan.
Reference Number: 2023-002 – Significant Deficiency, Subrecipient Monitoring Criteria: Pass through entities must clearly identify to the subrecipient: (1) the award as a subaward at the time of subaward (or subsequent subaward modification) by providing the information described in 2 CFR section 200.332(a)(1); (2) all requirements imposed by the PTE on the subrecipient so that the federal award is used in accordance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award (2 CFR section 200.332(a)(2)); and (3) any additional requirements that the PTE imposes on the subrecipient in order for the PTE to meet its own responsibility for the federal award (e.g., financial, performance, and special reports) (2 CFR section 200.332(a)(3)). Condition: The contracts between the Board and its subrecipients did not include all the required elements as prescribed by 2 CFR Section 200.332. Cause: The Board did not segregate the source of funds between federal and state sources in a timely manner. As a result, the subrecipient did not have timely information of federal Uniform Guidance and Texas Grant Management Standards requirements. Effect: The Boards subrecipients may not have timely or accurate information to determine the source of federal vs state funding to segregate funds in accordance with the Uniform Guidance and Texas Grant Management Standards. Management Response: See management’s corrective action plan.
Reference Number: 2023-002 – Significant Deficiency, Subrecipient Monitoring Criteria: Pass through entities must clearly identify to the subrecipient: (1) the award as a subaward at the time of subaward (or subsequent subaward modification) by providing the information described in 2 CFR section 200.332(a)(1); (2) all requirements imposed by the PTE on the subrecipient so that the federal award is used in accordance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award (2 CFR section 200.332(a)(2)); and (3) any additional requirements that the PTE imposes on the subrecipient in order for the PTE to meet its own responsibility for the federal award (e.g., financial, performance, and special reports) (2 CFR section 200.332(a)(3)). Condition: The contracts between the Board and its subrecipients did not include all the required elements as prescribed by 2 CFR Section 200.332. Cause: The Board did not segregate the source of funds between federal and state sources in a timely manner. As a result, the subrecipient did not have timely information of federal Uniform Guidance and Texas Grant Management Standards requirements. Effect: The Boards subrecipients may not have timely or accurate information to determine the source of federal vs state funding to segregate funds in accordance with the Uniform Guidance and Texas Grant Management Standards. Management Response: See management’s corrective action plan.
Reference Number: 2023-002 – Significant Deficiency, Subrecipient Monitoring Criteria: Pass through entities must clearly identify to the subrecipient: (1) the award as a subaward at the time of subaward (or subsequent subaward modification) by providing the information described in 2 CFR section 200.332(a)(1); (2) all requirements imposed by the PTE on the subrecipient so that the federal award is used in accordance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award (2 CFR section 200.332(a)(2)); and (3) any additional requirements that the PTE imposes on the subrecipient in order for the PTE to meet its own responsibility for the federal award (e.g., financial, performance, and special reports) (2 CFR section 200.332(a)(3)). Condition: The contracts between the Board and its subrecipients did not include all the required elements as prescribed by 2 CFR Section 200.332. Cause: The Board did not segregate the source of funds between federal and state sources in a timely manner. As a result, the subrecipient did not have timely information of federal Uniform Guidance and Texas Grant Management Standards requirements. Effect: The Boards subrecipients may not have timely or accurate information to determine the source of federal vs state funding to segregate funds in accordance with the Uniform Guidance and Texas Grant Management Standards. Management Response: See management’s corrective action plan.
Reference Number: 2023-002 – Significant Deficiency, Subrecipient Monitoring Criteria: Pass through entities must clearly identify to the subrecipient: (1) the award as a subaward at the time of subaward (or subsequent subaward modification) by providing the information described in 2 CFR section 200.332(a)(1); (2) all requirements imposed by the PTE on the subrecipient so that the federal award is used in accordance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award (2 CFR section 200.332(a)(2)); and (3) any additional requirements that the PTE imposes on the subrecipient in order for the PTE to meet its own responsibility for the federal award (e.g., financial, performance, and special reports) (2 CFR section 200.332(a)(3)). Condition: The contracts between the Board and its subrecipients did not include all the required elements as prescribed by 2 CFR Section 200.332. Cause: The Board did not segregate the source of funds between federal and state sources in a timely manner. As a result, the subrecipient did not have timely information of federal Uniform Guidance and Texas Grant Management Standards requirements. Effect: The Boards subrecipients may not have timely or accurate information to determine the source of federal vs state funding to segregate funds in accordance with the Uniform Guidance and Texas Grant Management Standards. Management Response: See management’s corrective action plan.
Reference Number: 2023-002 – Significant Deficiency, Subrecipient Monitoring Criteria: Pass through entities must clearly identify to the subrecipient: (1) the award as a subaward at the time of subaward (or subsequent subaward modification) by providing the information described in 2 CFR section 200.332(a)(1); (2) all requirements imposed by the PTE on the subrecipient so that the federal award is used in accordance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award (2 CFR section 200.332(a)(2)); and (3) any additional requirements that the PTE imposes on the subrecipient in order for the PTE to meet its own responsibility for the federal award (e.g., financial, performance, and special reports) (2 CFR section 200.332(a)(3)). Condition: The contracts between the Board and its subrecipients did not include all the required elements as prescribed by 2 CFR Section 200.332. Cause: The Board did not segregate the source of funds between federal and state sources in a timely manner. As a result, the subrecipient did not have timely information of federal Uniform Guidance and Texas Grant Management Standards requirements. Effect: The Boards subrecipients may not have timely or accurate information to determine the source of federal vs state funding to segregate funds in accordance with the Uniform Guidance and Texas Grant Management Standards. Management Response: See management’s corrective action plan.
Reference Number: 2023-002 – Significant Deficiency, Subrecipient Monitoring Criteria: Pass through entities must clearly identify to the subrecipient: (1) the award as a subaward at the time of subaward (or subsequent subaward modification) by providing the information described in 2 CFR section 200.332(a)(1); (2) all requirements imposed by the PTE on the subrecipient so that the federal award is used in accordance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award (2 CFR section 200.332(a)(2)); and (3) any additional requirements that the PTE imposes on the subrecipient in order for the PTE to meet its own responsibility for the federal award (e.g., financial, performance, and special reports) (2 CFR section 200.332(a)(3)). Condition: The contracts between the Board and its subrecipients did not include all the required elements as prescribed by 2 CFR Section 200.332. Cause: The Board did not segregate the source of funds between federal and state sources in a timely manner. As a result, the subrecipient did not have timely information of federal Uniform Guidance and Texas Grant Management Standards requirements. Effect: The Boards subrecipients may not have timely or accurate information to determine the source of federal vs state funding to segregate funds in accordance with the Uniform Guidance and Texas Grant Management Standards. Management Response: See management’s corrective action plan.
Reference Number: 2023-002 – Significant Deficiency, Subrecipient Monitoring Criteria: Pass through entities must clearly identify to the subrecipient: (1) the award as a subaward at the time of subaward (or subsequent subaward modification) by providing the information described in 2 CFR section 200.332(a)(1); (2) all requirements imposed by the PTE on the subrecipient so that the federal award is used in accordance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award (2 CFR section 200.332(a)(2)); and (3) any additional requirements that the PTE imposes on the subrecipient in order for the PTE to meet its own responsibility for the federal award (e.g., financial, performance, and special reports) (2 CFR section 200.332(a)(3)). Condition: The contracts between the Board and its subrecipients did not include all the required elements as prescribed by 2 CFR Section 200.332. Cause: The Board did not segregate the source of funds between federal and state sources in a timely manner. As a result, the subrecipient did not have timely information of federal Uniform Guidance and Texas Grant Management Standards requirements. Effect: The Boards subrecipients may not have timely or accurate information to determine the source of federal vs state funding to segregate funds in accordance with the Uniform Guidance and Texas Grant Management Standards. Management Response: See management’s corrective action plan.
Reference Number: 2023-002 – Significant Deficiency, Subrecipient Monitoring Criteria: Pass through entities must clearly identify to the subrecipient: (1) the award as a subaward at the time of subaward (or subsequent subaward modification) by providing the information described in 2 CFR section 200.332(a)(1); (2) all requirements imposed by the PTE on the subrecipient so that the federal award is used in accordance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award (2 CFR section 200.332(a)(2)); and (3) any additional requirements that the PTE imposes on the subrecipient in order for the PTE to meet its own responsibility for the federal award (e.g., financial, performance, and special reports) (2 CFR section 200.332(a)(3)). Condition: The contracts between the Board and its subrecipients did not include all the required elements as prescribed by 2 CFR Section 200.332. Cause: The Board did not segregate the source of funds between federal and state sources in a timely manner. As a result, the subrecipient did not have timely information of federal Uniform Guidance and Texas Grant Management Standards requirements. Effect: The Boards subrecipients may not have timely or accurate information to determine the source of federal vs state funding to segregate funds in accordance with the Uniform Guidance and Texas Grant Management Standards. Management Response: See management’s corrective action plan.
2023-003 – COVID 19: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Federal Awarding Agency – U.S. Department of the Treasury Assistance Listing Number – 21.027 FAIN – n/a Award Year – 2021 Questioned costs – none Criteria: 2 CFR Part 200 in general and 2 CFR sections 200.303(a) require non-Federal entities to establish and maintain effective internal controls over Federal awards, including the requirements for allowable costs, cost principles, and earmarking. The related compliance requirements are set in 2 CFR Part 200 sections 200.514(c), 200.212, 200.318(h), 200.332, 180.300 and subpart E; 48 CFR section 52.209-6; 31 CFR section 19.300; sections 602 and 603 of the Social Security Act as added by section 9901 of the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021, Pub. L. No. 117-2 as codified at 42 USC 802 and 803 and 31 CFR Part 35, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition: Controls related to calculation and reporting of lost revenue were not effective and the amount calculated as base year revenue was incorrectly reported. Cause: Base year calculation of revenue was performed using interim financial information and was not reconciled to final audited reports. Base year calculation of revenue was not clearly documented. Subsequent year revenue calculations were performed by a consultant who was not engaged to review the base year calculation. Controls over such calculations were not effective. Effect: Calculation of lost revenue was incorrectly reported. Expenditures related to the provision of government services related to such lost revenue did not exceed the actual lost revenue. Recommendation: We recommend that the City ensure that all controls for grants be documented in written procedures which should include the name or title of the positions responsible for each control (preparation, review, reconciliation, etc.) and that the performance of the controls be documented in a clear, reperformable manner including the name and date of each responsible individual and which specific control they performed over compliance for the grant.
2023-003 – COVID 19: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Federal Awarding Agency – U.S. Department of the Treasury Assistance Listing Number – 21.027 FAIN – n/a Award Year – 2021 Questioned costs – none Criteria: 2 CFR Part 200 in general and 2 CFR sections 200.303(a) require non-Federal entities to establish and maintain effective internal controls over Federal awards, including the requirements for allowable costs, cost principles, and earmarking. The related compliance requirements are set in 2 CFR Part 200 sections 200.514(c), 200.212, 200.318(h), 200.332, 180.300 and subpart E; 48 CFR section 52.209-6; 31 CFR section 19.300; sections 602 and 603 of the Social Security Act as added by section 9901 of the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021, Pub. L. No. 117-2 as codified at 42 USC 802 and 803 and 31 CFR Part 35, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition: Controls related to calculation and reporting of lost revenue were not effective and the amount calculated as base year revenue was incorrectly reported. Cause: Base year calculation of revenue was performed using interim financial information and was not reconciled to final audited reports. Base year calculation of revenue was not clearly documented. Subsequent year revenue calculations were performed by a consultant who was not engaged to review the base year calculation. Controls over such calculations were not effective. Effect: Calculation of lost revenue was incorrectly reported. Expenditures related to the provision of government services related to such lost revenue did not exceed the actual lost revenue. Recommendation: We recommend that the City ensure that all controls for grants be documented in written procedures which should include the name or title of the positions responsible for each control (preparation, review, reconciliation, etc.) and that the performance of the controls be documented in a clear, reperformable manner including the name and date of each responsible individual and which specific control they performed over compliance for the grant.
Federal Agency: United States Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Federal Program: R&D Cluster Federal Award Numbers: Various Federal Award Years: Various Reference: 2023 003 Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332, a pass through entity (PTE) must: (a) Ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the following information at the time of the subaward and if any of these data elements change, include the changes in subsequent subaward modification. When some of this information is not available, the pass through entity must provide the best information available to describe the Federal award and subaward. Required information includes: (xii) Assistance Listings number and Title; the pass through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each Federal award and the Assistance Listings Number at time of disbursement; (2 CFE section 200.332xxi) (b) Evaluate each subrecipient’s risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring described in paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section, which may include consideration of such factors as: (1) The subrecipient’s prior experience with the same or similar subawards; (2) The results of previous audits including whether or not the subrecipient receives a Single Audit in accordance with Subpart F of this part, and the extent to which the same or similar subaward has been audited as a major program; (3) Whether the subrecipient has new personnel or new or substantially changed systems; and (4) The extent and results of Federal awarding agency monitoring (e.g., if the subrecipient also receives Federal awards directly from a Federal awarding agency). Additionally, 45 CFR section 75 303(a) states the non Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition When subawards are made to subrecipients, the pass through entities are required to communicate the dollar amount made available under each Federal award and the Assistance Listings Number (ALN) at time of disbursement. BMC does not have system in place to provide the ALN at the time of disbursement of funds. During the year ended September 30, 2023, the BMC passed through $18,031,446 of federal funding to subrecipients. In order to assess the subrecipient’s risk of non compliance, BMC has subrecipient monitoring policies and procedures in place which include the use of a risk assessment questionnaire. The risk assessment questionnaire includes considerations consistent with 2 CFR 200.332(b), including the entity’s prior experience and results of Single Audits, in addition to other factors. As part of our testing related subrecipient monitoring, we identified the following: 1. For 4 of 16 subrecipients selected for testwork BMC did not perform a risk assessment of the entity for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring related to the subaward. However, for these subrecipients, BMC did perform monitoring procedures, including review of invoices for reimbursement, review of Research Performance Progress Reports and review of Single Audit reports. Cause The condition found was primarily due to the monitoring procedures implemented by BMC do not include a review to ensure that a risk assessment is performed for each active subrecipient and BMC does not have a mechanism in place to provide the ALN at the time of disbursement of funds to the subrecipient. Possible Asserted Effect Failure to perform an annual risk assessment to determine appropriate subrecipient monitoring procedures may result in insufficient monitoring procedures being performed to detect subrecipient noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Failure to adequately communicate award identification information could result in the subrecipient not being able to adequately track and report the subawards received resulting in errors being reported on the schedule of expenditures of federal awards within a subrecipient’s annual single audit report and not being able to comply with required terms and conditions of the federal award. Questioned Costs None. Statistical Sampling The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendation We recommend BMC implement policies, procedures, and internal controls to ensure subrecipient risk assessments are performed for each subrecipient to determine the appropriate subrecipient monitoring is performed in accordance with 45 CFR 75.352(d) and 45 CFR 75.352(e). We recommend that BMC enhance its processes and internal controls over its reporting to the subrecipients of the federal program to ensure all award identification information required under 45 CFR 75.352(a) is provided to the subrecipients.
Federal Agency: United States Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Federal Program: R&D Cluster Federal Award Numbers: Various Federal Award Years: Various Reference: 2023 003 Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332, a pass through entity (PTE) must: (a) Ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the following information at the time of the subaward and if any of these data elements change, include the changes in subsequent subaward modification. When some of this information is not available, the pass through entity must provide the best information available to describe the Federal award and subaward. Required information includes: (xii) Assistance Listings number and Title; the pass through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each Federal award and the Assistance Listings Number at time of disbursement; (2 CFE section 200.332xxi) (b) Evaluate each subrecipient’s risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring described in paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section, which may include consideration of such factors as: (1) The subrecipient’s prior experience with the same or similar subawards; (2) The results of previous audits including whether or not the subrecipient receives a Single Audit in accordance with Subpart F of this part, and the extent to which the same or similar subaward has been audited as a major program; (3) Whether the subrecipient has new personnel or new or substantially changed systems; and (4) The extent and results of Federal awarding agency monitoring (e.g., if the subrecipient also receives Federal awards directly from a Federal awarding agency). Additionally, 45 CFR section 75 303(a) states the non Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition When subawards are made to subrecipients, the pass through entities are required to communicate the dollar amount made available under each Federal award and the Assistance Listings Number (ALN) at time of disbursement. BMC does not have system in place to provide the ALN at the time of disbursement of funds. During the year ended September 30, 2023, the BMC passed through $18,031,446 of federal funding to subrecipients. In order to assess the subrecipient’s risk of non compliance, BMC has subrecipient monitoring policies and procedures in place which include the use of a risk assessment questionnaire. The risk assessment questionnaire includes considerations consistent with 2 CFR 200.332(b), including the entity’s prior experience and results of Single Audits, in addition to other factors. As part of our testing related subrecipient monitoring, we identified the following: 1. For 4 of 16 subrecipients selected for testwork BMC did not perform a risk assessment of the entity for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring related to the subaward. However, for these subrecipients, BMC did perform monitoring procedures, including review of invoices for reimbursement, review of Research Performance Progress Reports and review of Single Audit reports. Cause The condition found was primarily due to the monitoring procedures implemented by BMC do not include a review to ensure that a risk assessment is performed for each active subrecipient and BMC does not have a mechanism in place to provide the ALN at the time of disbursement of funds to the subrecipient. Possible Asserted Effect Failure to perform an annual risk assessment to determine appropriate subrecipient monitoring procedures may result in insufficient monitoring procedures being performed to detect subrecipient noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Failure to adequately communicate award identification information could result in the subrecipient not being able to adequately track and report the subawards received resulting in errors being reported on the schedule of expenditures of federal awards within a subrecipient’s annual single audit report and not being able to comply with required terms and conditions of the federal award. Questioned Costs None. Statistical Sampling The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendation We recommend BMC implement policies, procedures, and internal controls to ensure subrecipient risk assessments are performed for each subrecipient to determine the appropriate subrecipient monitoring is performed in accordance with 45 CFR 75.352(d) and 45 CFR 75.352(e). We recommend that BMC enhance its processes and internal controls over its reporting to the subrecipients of the federal program to ensure all award identification information required under 45 CFR 75.352(a) is provided to the subrecipients.
Federal Agency: United States Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Federal Program: R&D Cluster Federal Award Numbers: Various Federal Award Years: Various Reference: 2023 003 Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332, a pass through entity (PTE) must: (a) Ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the following information at the time of the subaward and if any of these data elements change, include the changes in subsequent subaward modification. When some of this information is not available, the pass through entity must provide the best information available to describe the Federal award and subaward. Required information includes: (xii) Assistance Listings number and Title; the pass through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each Federal award and the Assistance Listings Number at time of disbursement; (2 CFE section 200.332xxi) (b) Evaluate each subrecipient’s risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring described in paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section, which may include consideration of such factors as: (1) The subrecipient’s prior experience with the same or similar subawards; (2) The results of previous audits including whether or not the subrecipient receives a Single Audit in accordance with Subpart F of this part, and the extent to which the same or similar subaward has been audited as a major program; (3) Whether the subrecipient has new personnel or new or substantially changed systems; and (4) The extent and results of Federal awarding agency monitoring (e.g., if the subrecipient also receives Federal awards directly from a Federal awarding agency). Additionally, 45 CFR section 75 303(a) states the non Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition When subawards are made to subrecipients, the pass through entities are required to communicate the dollar amount made available under each Federal award and the Assistance Listings Number (ALN) at time of disbursement. BMC does not have system in place to provide the ALN at the time of disbursement of funds. During the year ended September 30, 2023, the BMC passed through $18,031,446 of federal funding to subrecipients. In order to assess the subrecipient’s risk of non compliance, BMC has subrecipient monitoring policies and procedures in place which include the use of a risk assessment questionnaire. The risk assessment questionnaire includes considerations consistent with 2 CFR 200.332(b), including the entity’s prior experience and results of Single Audits, in addition to other factors. As part of our testing related subrecipient monitoring, we identified the following: 1. For 4 of 16 subrecipients selected for testwork BMC did not perform a risk assessment of the entity for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring related to the subaward. However, for these subrecipients, BMC did perform monitoring procedures, including review of invoices for reimbursement, review of Research Performance Progress Reports and review of Single Audit reports. Cause The condition found was primarily due to the monitoring procedures implemented by BMC do not include a review to ensure that a risk assessment is performed for each active subrecipient and BMC does not have a mechanism in place to provide the ALN at the time of disbursement of funds to the subrecipient. Possible Asserted Effect Failure to perform an annual risk assessment to determine appropriate subrecipient monitoring procedures may result in insufficient monitoring procedures being performed to detect subrecipient noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Failure to adequately communicate award identification information could result in the subrecipient not being able to adequately track and report the subawards received resulting in errors being reported on the schedule of expenditures of federal awards within a subrecipient’s annual single audit report and not being able to comply with required terms and conditions of the federal award. Questioned Costs None. Statistical Sampling The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendation We recommend BMC implement policies, procedures, and internal controls to ensure subrecipient risk assessments are performed for each subrecipient to determine the appropriate subrecipient monitoring is performed in accordance with 45 CFR 75.352(d) and 45 CFR 75.352(e). We recommend that BMC enhance its processes and internal controls over its reporting to the subrecipients of the federal program to ensure all award identification information required under 45 CFR 75.352(a) is provided to the subrecipients.
Federal Agency: United States Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Federal Program: R&D Cluster Federal Award Numbers: Various Federal Award Years: Various Reference: 2023 003 Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332, a pass through entity (PTE) must: (a) Ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the following information at the time of the subaward and if any of these data elements change, include the changes in subsequent subaward modification. When some of this information is not available, the pass through entity must provide the best information available to describe the Federal award and subaward. Required information includes: (xii) Assistance Listings number and Title; the pass through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each Federal award and the Assistance Listings Number at time of disbursement; (2 CFE section 200.332xxi) (b) Evaluate each subrecipient’s risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring described in paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section, which may include consideration of such factors as: (1) The subrecipient’s prior experience with the same or similar subawards; (2) The results of previous audits including whether or not the subrecipient receives a Single Audit in accordance with Subpart F of this part, and the extent to which the same or similar subaward has been audited as a major program; (3) Whether the subrecipient has new personnel or new or substantially changed systems; and (4) The extent and results of Federal awarding agency monitoring (e.g., if the subrecipient also receives Federal awards directly from a Federal awarding agency). Additionally, 45 CFR section 75 303(a) states the non Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition When subawards are made to subrecipients, the pass through entities are required to communicate the dollar amount made available under each Federal award and the Assistance Listings Number (ALN) at time of disbursement. BMC does not have system in place to provide the ALN at the time of disbursement of funds. During the year ended September 30, 2023, the BMC passed through $18,031,446 of federal funding to subrecipients. In order to assess the subrecipient’s risk of non compliance, BMC has subrecipient monitoring policies and procedures in place which include the use of a risk assessment questionnaire. The risk assessment questionnaire includes considerations consistent with 2 CFR 200.332(b), including the entity’s prior experience and results of Single Audits, in addition to other factors. As part of our testing related subrecipient monitoring, we identified the following: 1. For 4 of 16 subrecipients selected for testwork BMC did not perform a risk assessment of the entity for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring related to the subaward. However, for these subrecipients, BMC did perform monitoring procedures, including review of invoices for reimbursement, review of Research Performance Progress Reports and review of Single Audit reports. Cause The condition found was primarily due to the monitoring procedures implemented by BMC do not include a review to ensure that a risk assessment is performed for each active subrecipient and BMC does not have a mechanism in place to provide the ALN at the time of disbursement of funds to the subrecipient. Possible Asserted Effect Failure to perform an annual risk assessment to determine appropriate subrecipient monitoring procedures may result in insufficient monitoring procedures being performed to detect subrecipient noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Failure to adequately communicate award identification information could result in the subrecipient not being able to adequately track and report the subawards received resulting in errors being reported on the schedule of expenditures of federal awards within a subrecipient’s annual single audit report and not being able to comply with required terms and conditions of the federal award. Questioned Costs None. Statistical Sampling The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendation We recommend BMC implement policies, procedures, and internal controls to ensure subrecipient risk assessments are performed for each subrecipient to determine the appropriate subrecipient monitoring is performed in accordance with 45 CFR 75.352(d) and 45 CFR 75.352(e). We recommend that BMC enhance its processes and internal controls over its reporting to the subrecipients of the federal program to ensure all award identification information required under 45 CFR 75.352(a) is provided to the subrecipients.
Federal Agency: United States Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Federal Program: R&D Cluster Federal Award Numbers: Various Federal Award Years: Various Reference: 2023 003 Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332, a pass through entity (PTE) must: (a) Ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the following information at the time of the subaward and if any of these data elements change, include the changes in subsequent subaward modification. When some of this information is not available, the pass through entity must provide the best information available to describe the Federal award and subaward. Required information includes: (xii) Assistance Listings number and Title; the pass through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each Federal award and the Assistance Listings Number at time of disbursement; (2 CFE section 200.332xxi) (b) Evaluate each subrecipient’s risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring described in paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section, which may include consideration of such factors as: (1) The subrecipient’s prior experience with the same or similar subawards; (2) The results of previous audits including whether or not the subrecipient receives a Single Audit in accordance with Subpart F of this part, and the extent to which the same or similar subaward has been audited as a major program; (3) Whether the subrecipient has new personnel or new or substantially changed systems; and (4) The extent and results of Federal awarding agency monitoring (e.g., if the subrecipient also receives Federal awards directly from a Federal awarding agency). Additionally, 45 CFR section 75 303(a) states the non Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition When subawards are made to subrecipients, the pass through entities are required to communicate the dollar amount made available under each Federal award and the Assistance Listings Number (ALN) at time of disbursement. BMC does not have system in place to provide the ALN at the time of disbursement of funds. During the year ended September 30, 2023, the BMC passed through $18,031,446 of federal funding to subrecipients. In order to assess the subrecipient’s risk of non compliance, BMC has subrecipient monitoring policies and procedures in place which include the use of a risk assessment questionnaire. The risk assessment questionnaire includes considerations consistent with 2 CFR 200.332(b), including the entity’s prior experience and results of Single Audits, in addition to other factors. As part of our testing related subrecipient monitoring, we identified the following: 1. For 4 of 16 subrecipients selected for testwork BMC did not perform a risk assessment of the entity for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring related to the subaward. However, for these subrecipients, BMC did perform monitoring procedures, including review of invoices for reimbursement, review of Research Performance Progress Reports and review of Single Audit reports. Cause The condition found was primarily due to the monitoring procedures implemented by BMC do not include a review to ensure that a risk assessment is performed for each active subrecipient and BMC does not have a mechanism in place to provide the ALN at the time of disbursement of funds to the subrecipient. Possible Asserted Effect Failure to perform an annual risk assessment to determine appropriate subrecipient monitoring procedures may result in insufficient monitoring procedures being performed to detect subrecipient noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Failure to adequately communicate award identification information could result in the subrecipient not being able to adequately track and report the subawards received resulting in errors being reported on the schedule of expenditures of federal awards within a subrecipient’s annual single audit report and not being able to comply with required terms and conditions of the federal award. Questioned Costs None. Statistical Sampling The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendation We recommend BMC implement policies, procedures, and internal controls to ensure subrecipient risk assessments are performed for each subrecipient to determine the appropriate subrecipient monitoring is performed in accordance with 45 CFR 75.352(d) and 45 CFR 75.352(e). We recommend that BMC enhance its processes and internal controls over its reporting to the subrecipients of the federal program to ensure all award identification information required under 45 CFR 75.352(a) is provided to the subrecipients.
Federal Agency: United States Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Federal Program: R&D Cluster Federal Award Numbers: Various Federal Award Years: Various Reference: 2023 003 Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332, a pass through entity (PTE) must: (a) Ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the following information at the time of the subaward and if any of these data elements change, include the changes in subsequent subaward modification. When some of this information is not available, the pass through entity must provide the best information available to describe the Federal award and subaward. Required information includes: (xii) Assistance Listings number and Title; the pass through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each Federal award and the Assistance Listings Number at time of disbursement; (2 CFE section 200.332xxi) (b) Evaluate each subrecipient’s risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring described in paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section, which may include consideration of such factors as: (1) The subrecipient’s prior experience with the same or similar subawards; (2) The results of previous audits including whether or not the subrecipient receives a Single Audit in accordance with Subpart F of this part, and the extent to which the same or similar subaward has been audited as a major program; (3) Whether the subrecipient has new personnel or new or substantially changed systems; and (4) The extent and results of Federal awarding agency monitoring (e.g., if the subrecipient also receives Federal awards directly from a Federal awarding agency). Additionally, 45 CFR section 75 303(a) states the non Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition When subawards are made to subrecipients, the pass through entities are required to communicate the dollar amount made available under each Federal award and the Assistance Listings Number (ALN) at time of disbursement. BMC does not have system in place to provide the ALN at the time of disbursement of funds. During the year ended September 30, 2023, the BMC passed through $18,031,446 of federal funding to subrecipients. In order to assess the subrecipient’s risk of non compliance, BMC has subrecipient monitoring policies and procedures in place which include the use of a risk assessment questionnaire. The risk assessment questionnaire includes considerations consistent with 2 CFR 200.332(b), including the entity’s prior experience and results of Single Audits, in addition to other factors. As part of our testing related subrecipient monitoring, we identified the following: 1. For 4 of 16 subrecipients selected for testwork BMC did not perform a risk assessment of the entity for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring related to the subaward. However, for these subrecipients, BMC did perform monitoring procedures, including review of invoices for reimbursement, review of Research Performance Progress Reports and review of Single Audit reports. Cause The condition found was primarily due to the monitoring procedures implemented by BMC do not include a review to ensure that a risk assessment is performed for each active subrecipient and BMC does not have a mechanism in place to provide the ALN at the time of disbursement of funds to the subrecipient. Possible Asserted Effect Failure to perform an annual risk assessment to determine appropriate subrecipient monitoring procedures may result in insufficient monitoring procedures being performed to detect subrecipient noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Failure to adequately communicate award identification information could result in the subrecipient not being able to adequately track and report the subawards received resulting in errors being reported on the schedule of expenditures of federal awards within a subrecipient’s annual single audit report and not being able to comply with required terms and conditions of the federal award. Questioned Costs None. Statistical Sampling The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendation We recommend BMC implement policies, procedures, and internal controls to ensure subrecipient risk assessments are performed for each subrecipient to determine the appropriate subrecipient monitoring is performed in accordance with 45 CFR 75.352(d) and 45 CFR 75.352(e). We recommend that BMC enhance its processes and internal controls over its reporting to the subrecipients of the federal program to ensure all award identification information required under 45 CFR 75.352(a) is provided to the subrecipients.
Federal Agency: United States Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Federal Program: R&D Cluster Federal Award Numbers: Various Federal Award Years: Various Reference: 2023 003 Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332, a pass through entity (PTE) must: (a) Ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the following information at the time of the subaward and if any of these data elements change, include the changes in subsequent subaward modification. When some of this information is not available, the pass through entity must provide the best information available to describe the Federal award and subaward. Required information includes: (xii) Assistance Listings number and Title; the pass through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each Federal award and the Assistance Listings Number at time of disbursement; (2 CFE section 200.332xxi) (b) Evaluate each subrecipient’s risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring described in paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section, which may include consideration of such factors as: (1) The subrecipient’s prior experience with the same or similar subawards; (2) The results of previous audits including whether or not the subrecipient receives a Single Audit in accordance with Subpart F of this part, and the extent to which the same or similar subaward has been audited as a major program; (3) Whether the subrecipient has new personnel or new or substantially changed systems; and (4) The extent and results of Federal awarding agency monitoring (e.g., if the subrecipient also receives Federal awards directly from a Federal awarding agency). Additionally, 45 CFR section 75 303(a) states the non Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition When subawards are made to subrecipients, the pass through entities are required to communicate the dollar amount made available under each Federal award and the Assistance Listings Number (ALN) at time of disbursement. BMC does not have system in place to provide the ALN at the time of disbursement of funds. During the year ended September 30, 2023, the BMC passed through $18,031,446 of federal funding to subrecipients. In order to assess the subrecipient’s risk of non compliance, BMC has subrecipient monitoring policies and procedures in place which include the use of a risk assessment questionnaire. The risk assessment questionnaire includes considerations consistent with 2 CFR 200.332(b), including the entity’s prior experience and results of Single Audits, in addition to other factors. As part of our testing related subrecipient monitoring, we identified the following: 1. For 4 of 16 subrecipients selected for testwork BMC did not perform a risk assessment of the entity for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring related to the subaward. However, for these subrecipients, BMC did perform monitoring procedures, including review of invoices for reimbursement, review of Research Performance Progress Reports and review of Single Audit reports. Cause The condition found was primarily due to the monitoring procedures implemented by BMC do not include a review to ensure that a risk assessment is performed for each active subrecipient and BMC does not have a mechanism in place to provide the ALN at the time of disbursement of funds to the subrecipient. Possible Asserted Effect Failure to perform an annual risk assessment to determine appropriate subrecipient monitoring procedures may result in insufficient monitoring procedures being performed to detect subrecipient noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Failure to adequately communicate award identification information could result in the subrecipient not being able to adequately track and report the subawards received resulting in errors being reported on the schedule of expenditures of federal awards within a subrecipient’s annual single audit report and not being able to comply with required terms and conditions of the federal award. Questioned Costs None. Statistical Sampling The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendation We recommend BMC implement policies, procedures, and internal controls to ensure subrecipient risk assessments are performed for each subrecipient to determine the appropriate subrecipient monitoring is performed in accordance with 45 CFR 75.352(d) and 45 CFR 75.352(e). We recommend that BMC enhance its processes and internal controls over its reporting to the subrecipients of the federal program to ensure all award identification information required under 45 CFR 75.352(a) is provided to the subrecipients.
Federal Agency: United States Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Federal Program: R&D Cluster Federal Award Numbers: Various Federal Award Years: Various Reference: 2023 003 Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332, a pass through entity (PTE) must: (a) Ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the following information at the time of the subaward and if any of these data elements change, include the changes in subsequent subaward modification. When some of this information is not available, the pass through entity must provide the best information available to describe the Federal award and subaward. Required information includes: (xii) Assistance Listings number and Title; the pass through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each Federal award and the Assistance Listings Number at time of disbursement; (2 CFE section 200.332xxi) (b) Evaluate each subrecipient’s risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring described in paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section, which may include consideration of such factors as: (1) The subrecipient’s prior experience with the same or similar subawards; (2) The results of previous audits including whether or not the subrecipient receives a Single Audit in accordance with Subpart F of this part, and the extent to which the same or similar subaward has been audited as a major program; (3) Whether the subrecipient has new personnel or new or substantially changed systems; and (4) The extent and results of Federal awarding agency monitoring (e.g., if the subrecipient also receives Federal awards directly from a Federal awarding agency). Additionally, 45 CFR section 75 303(a) states the non Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition When subawards are made to subrecipients, the pass through entities are required to communicate the dollar amount made available under each Federal award and the Assistance Listings Number (ALN) at time of disbursement. BMC does not have system in place to provide the ALN at the time of disbursement of funds. During the year ended September 30, 2023, the BMC passed through $18,031,446 of federal funding to subrecipients. In order to assess the subrecipient’s risk of non compliance, BMC has subrecipient monitoring policies and procedures in place which include the use of a risk assessment questionnaire. The risk assessment questionnaire includes considerations consistent with 2 CFR 200.332(b), including the entity’s prior experience and results of Single Audits, in addition to other factors. As part of our testing related subrecipient monitoring, we identified the following: 1. For 4 of 16 subrecipients selected for testwork BMC did not perform a risk assessment of the entity for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring related to the subaward. However, for these subrecipients, BMC did perform monitoring procedures, including review of invoices for reimbursement, review of Research Performance Progress Reports and review of Single Audit reports. Cause The condition found was primarily due to the monitoring procedures implemented by BMC do not include a review to ensure that a risk assessment is performed for each active subrecipient and BMC does not have a mechanism in place to provide the ALN at the time of disbursement of funds to the subrecipient. Possible Asserted Effect Failure to perform an annual risk assessment to determine appropriate subrecipient monitoring procedures may result in insufficient monitoring procedures being performed to detect subrecipient noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Failure to adequately communicate award identification information could result in the subrecipient not being able to adequately track and report the subawards received resulting in errors being reported on the schedule of expenditures of federal awards within a subrecipient’s annual single audit report and not being able to comply with required terms and conditions of the federal award. Questioned Costs None. Statistical Sampling The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendation We recommend BMC implement policies, procedures, and internal controls to ensure subrecipient risk assessments are performed for each subrecipient to determine the appropriate subrecipient monitoring is performed in accordance with 45 CFR 75.352(d) and 45 CFR 75.352(e). We recommend that BMC enhance its processes and internal controls over its reporting to the subrecipients of the federal program to ensure all award identification information required under 45 CFR 75.352(a) is provided to the subrecipients.
Federal Agency: United States Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Federal Program: R&D Cluster Federal Award Numbers: Various Federal Award Years: Various Reference: 2023 003 Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332, a pass through entity (PTE) must: (a) Ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the following information at the time of the subaward and if any of these data elements change, include the changes in subsequent subaward modification. When some of this information is not available, the pass through entity must provide the best information available to describe the Federal award and subaward. Required information includes: (xii) Assistance Listings number and Title; the pass through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each Federal award and the Assistance Listings Number at time of disbursement; (2 CFE section 200.332xxi) (b) Evaluate each subrecipient’s risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring described in paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section, which may include consideration of such factors as: (1) The subrecipient’s prior experience with the same or similar subawards; (2) The results of previous audits including whether or not the subrecipient receives a Single Audit in accordance with Subpart F of this part, and the extent to which the same or similar subaward has been audited as a major program; (3) Whether the subrecipient has new personnel or new or substantially changed systems; and (4) The extent and results of Federal awarding agency monitoring (e.g., if the subrecipient also receives Federal awards directly from a Federal awarding agency). Additionally, 45 CFR section 75 303(a) states the non Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition When subawards are made to subrecipients, the pass through entities are required to communicate the dollar amount made available under each Federal award and the Assistance Listings Number (ALN) at time of disbursement. BMC does not have system in place to provide the ALN at the time of disbursement of funds. During the year ended September 30, 2023, the BMC passed through $18,031,446 of federal funding to subrecipients. In order to assess the subrecipient’s risk of non compliance, BMC has subrecipient monitoring policies and procedures in place which include the use of a risk assessment questionnaire. The risk assessment questionnaire includes considerations consistent with 2 CFR 200.332(b), including the entity’s prior experience and results of Single Audits, in addition to other factors. As part of our testing related subrecipient monitoring, we identified the following: 1. For 4 of 16 subrecipients selected for testwork BMC did not perform a risk assessment of the entity for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring related to the subaward. However, for these subrecipients, BMC did perform monitoring procedures, including review of invoices for reimbursement, review of Research Performance Progress Reports and review of Single Audit reports. Cause The condition found was primarily due to the monitoring procedures implemented by BMC do not include a review to ensure that a risk assessment is performed for each active subrecipient and BMC does not have a mechanism in place to provide the ALN at the time of disbursement of funds to the subrecipient. Possible Asserted Effect Failure to perform an annual risk assessment to determine appropriate subrecipient monitoring procedures may result in insufficient monitoring procedures being performed to detect subrecipient noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Failure to adequately communicate award identification information could result in the subrecipient not being able to adequately track and report the subawards received resulting in errors being reported on the schedule of expenditures of federal awards within a subrecipient’s annual single audit report and not being able to comply with required terms and conditions of the federal award. Questioned Costs None. Statistical Sampling The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendation We recommend BMC implement policies, procedures, and internal controls to ensure subrecipient risk assessments are performed for each subrecipient to determine the appropriate subrecipient monitoring is performed in accordance with 45 CFR 75.352(d) and 45 CFR 75.352(e). We recommend that BMC enhance its processes and internal controls over its reporting to the subrecipients of the federal program to ensure all award identification information required under 45 CFR 75.352(a) is provided to the subrecipients.
Federal Agency: United States Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Federal Program: R&D Cluster Federal Award Numbers: Various Federal Award Years: Various Reference: 2023 003 Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332, a pass through entity (PTE) must: (a) Ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the following information at the time of the subaward and if any of these data elements change, include the changes in subsequent subaward modification. When some of this information is not available, the pass through entity must provide the best information available to describe the Federal award and subaward. Required information includes: (xii) Assistance Listings number and Title; the pass through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each Federal award and the Assistance Listings Number at time of disbursement; (2 CFE section 200.332xxi) (b) Evaluate each subrecipient’s risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring described in paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section, which may include consideration of such factors as: (1) The subrecipient’s prior experience with the same or similar subawards; (2) The results of previous audits including whether or not the subrecipient receives a Single Audit in accordance with Subpart F of this part, and the extent to which the same or similar subaward has been audited as a major program; (3) Whether the subrecipient has new personnel or new or substantially changed systems; and (4) The extent and results of Federal awarding agency monitoring (e.g., if the subrecipient also receives Federal awards directly from a Federal awarding agency). Additionally, 45 CFR section 75 303(a) states the non Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition When subawards are made to subrecipients, the pass through entities are required to communicate the dollar amount made available under each Federal award and the Assistance Listings Number (ALN) at time of disbursement. BMC does not have system in place to provide the ALN at the time of disbursement of funds. During the year ended September 30, 2023, the BMC passed through $18,031,446 of federal funding to subrecipients. In order to assess the subrecipient’s risk of non compliance, BMC has subrecipient monitoring policies and procedures in place which include the use of a risk assessment questionnaire. The risk assessment questionnaire includes considerations consistent with 2 CFR 200.332(b), including the entity’s prior experience and results of Single Audits, in addition to other factors. As part of our testing related subrecipient monitoring, we identified the following: 1. For 4 of 16 subrecipients selected for testwork BMC did not perform a risk assessment of the entity for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring related to the subaward. However, for these subrecipients, BMC did perform monitoring procedures, including review of invoices for reimbursement, review of Research Performance Progress Reports and review of Single Audit reports. Cause The condition found was primarily due to the monitoring procedures implemented by BMC do not include a review to ensure that a risk assessment is performed for each active subrecipient and BMC does not have a mechanism in place to provide the ALN at the time of disbursement of funds to the subrecipient. Possible Asserted Effect Failure to perform an annual risk assessment to determine appropriate subrecipient monitoring procedures may result in insufficient monitoring procedures being performed to detect subrecipient noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Failure to adequately communicate award identification information could result in the subrecipient not being able to adequately track and report the subawards received resulting in errors being reported on the schedule of expenditures of federal awards within a subrecipient’s annual single audit report and not being able to comply with required terms and conditions of the federal award. Questioned Costs None. Statistical Sampling The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendation We recommend BMC implement policies, procedures, and internal controls to ensure subrecipient risk assessments are performed for each subrecipient to determine the appropriate subrecipient monitoring is performed in accordance with 45 CFR 75.352(d) and 45 CFR 75.352(e). We recommend that BMC enhance its processes and internal controls over its reporting to the subrecipients of the federal program to ensure all award identification information required under 45 CFR 75.352(a) is provided to the subrecipients.
Federal Agency: United States Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Federal Program: R&D Cluster Federal Award Numbers: Various Federal Award Years: Various Reference: 2023 003 Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332, a pass through entity (PTE) must: (a) Ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the following information at the time of the subaward and if any of these data elements change, include the changes in subsequent subaward modification. When some of this information is not available, the pass through entity must provide the best information available to describe the Federal award and subaward. Required information includes: (xii) Assistance Listings number and Title; the pass through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each Federal award and the Assistance Listings Number at time of disbursement; (2 CFE section 200.332xxi) (b) Evaluate each subrecipient’s risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring described in paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section, which may include consideration of such factors as: (1) The subrecipient’s prior experience with the same or similar subawards; (2) The results of previous audits including whether or not the subrecipient receives a Single Audit in accordance with Subpart F of this part, and the extent to which the same or similar subaward has been audited as a major program; (3) Whether the subrecipient has new personnel or new or substantially changed systems; and (4) The extent and results of Federal awarding agency monitoring (e.g., if the subrecipient also receives Federal awards directly from a Federal awarding agency). Additionally, 45 CFR section 75 303(a) states the non Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition When subawards are made to subrecipients, the pass through entities are required to communicate the dollar amount made available under each Federal award and the Assistance Listings Number (ALN) at time of disbursement. BMC does not have system in place to provide the ALN at the time of disbursement of funds. During the year ended September 30, 2023, the BMC passed through $18,031,446 of federal funding to subrecipients. In order to assess the subrecipient’s risk of non compliance, BMC has subrecipient monitoring policies and procedures in place which include the use of a risk assessment questionnaire. The risk assessment questionnaire includes considerations consistent with 2 CFR 200.332(b), including the entity’s prior experience and results of Single Audits, in addition to other factors. As part of our testing related subrecipient monitoring, we identified the following: 1. For 4 of 16 subrecipients selected for testwork BMC did not perform a risk assessment of the entity for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring related to the subaward. However, for these subrecipients, BMC did perform monitoring procedures, including review of invoices for reimbursement, review of Research Performance Progress Reports and review of Single Audit reports. Cause The condition found was primarily due to the monitoring procedures implemented by BMC do not include a review to ensure that a risk assessment is performed for each active subrecipient and BMC does not have a mechanism in place to provide the ALN at the time of disbursement of funds to the subrecipient. Possible Asserted Effect Failure to perform an annual risk assessment to determine appropriate subrecipient monitoring procedures may result in insufficient monitoring procedures being performed to detect subrecipient noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Failure to adequately communicate award identification information could result in the subrecipient not being able to adequately track and report the subawards received resulting in errors being reported on the schedule of expenditures of federal awards within a subrecipient’s annual single audit report and not being able to comply with required terms and conditions of the federal award. Questioned Costs None. Statistical Sampling The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendation We recommend BMC implement policies, procedures, and internal controls to ensure subrecipient risk assessments are performed for each subrecipient to determine the appropriate subrecipient monitoring is performed in accordance with 45 CFR 75.352(d) and 45 CFR 75.352(e). We recommend that BMC enhance its processes and internal controls over its reporting to the subrecipients of the federal program to ensure all award identification information required under 45 CFR 75.352(a) is provided to the subrecipients.
Federal Agency: United States Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Federal Program: R&D Cluster Federal Award Numbers: Various Federal Award Years: Various Reference: 2023 003 Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332, a pass through entity (PTE) must: (a) Ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the following information at the time of the subaward and if any of these data elements change, include the changes in subsequent subaward modification. When some of this information is not available, the pass through entity must provide the best information available to describe the Federal award and subaward. Required information includes: (xii) Assistance Listings number and Title; the pass through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each Federal award and the Assistance Listings Number at time of disbursement; (2 CFE section 200.332xxi) (b) Evaluate each subrecipient’s risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring described in paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section, which may include consideration of such factors as: (1) The subrecipient’s prior experience with the same or similar subawards; (2) The results of previous audits including whether or not the subrecipient receives a Single Audit in accordance with Subpart F of this part, and the extent to which the same or similar subaward has been audited as a major program; (3) Whether the subrecipient has new personnel or new or substantially changed systems; and (4) The extent and results of Federal awarding agency monitoring (e.g., if the subrecipient also receives Federal awards directly from a Federal awarding agency). Additionally, 45 CFR section 75 303(a) states the non Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition When subawards are made to subrecipients, the pass through entities are required to communicate the dollar amount made available under each Federal award and the Assistance Listings Number (ALN) at time of disbursement. BMC does not have system in place to provide the ALN at the time of disbursement of funds. During the year ended September 30, 2023, the BMC passed through $18,031,446 of federal funding to subrecipients. In order to assess the subrecipient’s risk of non compliance, BMC has subrecipient monitoring policies and procedures in place which include the use of a risk assessment questionnaire. The risk assessment questionnaire includes considerations consistent with 2 CFR 200.332(b), including the entity’s prior experience and results of Single Audits, in addition to other factors. As part of our testing related subrecipient monitoring, we identified the following: 1. For 4 of 16 subrecipients selected for testwork BMC did not perform a risk assessment of the entity for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring related to the subaward. However, for these subrecipients, BMC did perform monitoring procedures, including review of invoices for reimbursement, review of Research Performance Progress Reports and review of Single Audit reports. Cause The condition found was primarily due to the monitoring procedures implemented by BMC do not include a review to ensure that a risk assessment is performed for each active subrecipient and BMC does not have a mechanism in place to provide the ALN at the time of disbursement of funds to the subrecipient. Possible Asserted Effect Failure to perform an annual risk assessment to determine appropriate subrecipient monitoring procedures may result in insufficient monitoring procedures being performed to detect subrecipient noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Failure to adequately communicate award identification information could result in the subrecipient not being able to adequately track and report the subawards received resulting in errors being reported on the schedule of expenditures of federal awards within a subrecipient’s annual single audit report and not being able to comply with required terms and conditions of the federal award. Questioned Costs None. Statistical Sampling The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendation We recommend BMC implement policies, procedures, and internal controls to ensure subrecipient risk assessments are performed for each subrecipient to determine the appropriate subrecipient monitoring is performed in accordance with 45 CFR 75.352(d) and 45 CFR 75.352(e). We recommend that BMC enhance its processes and internal controls over its reporting to the subrecipients of the federal program to ensure all award identification information required under 45 CFR 75.352(a) is provided to the subrecipients.
Federal Agency: United States Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Federal Program: R&D Cluster Federal Award Numbers: Various Federal Award Years: Various Reference: 2023 003 Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332, a pass through entity (PTE) must: (a) Ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the following information at the time of the subaward and if any of these data elements change, include the changes in subsequent subaward modification. When some of this information is not available, the pass through entity must provide the best information available to describe the Federal award and subaward. Required information includes: (xii) Assistance Listings number and Title; the pass through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each Federal award and the Assistance Listings Number at time of disbursement; (2 CFE section 200.332xxi) (b) Evaluate each subrecipient’s risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring described in paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section, which may include consideration of such factors as: (1) The subrecipient’s prior experience with the same or similar subawards; (2) The results of previous audits including whether or not the subrecipient receives a Single Audit in accordance with Subpart F of this part, and the extent to which the same or similar subaward has been audited as a major program; (3) Whether the subrecipient has new personnel or new or substantially changed systems; and (4) The extent and results of Federal awarding agency monitoring (e.g., if the subrecipient also receives Federal awards directly from a Federal awarding agency). Additionally, 45 CFR section 75 303(a) states the non Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition When subawards are made to subrecipients, the pass through entities are required to communicate the dollar amount made available under each Federal award and the Assistance Listings Number (ALN) at time of disbursement. BMC does not have system in place to provide the ALN at the time of disbursement of funds. During the year ended September 30, 2023, the BMC passed through $18,031,446 of federal funding to subrecipients. In order to assess the subrecipient’s risk of non compliance, BMC has subrecipient monitoring policies and procedures in place which include the use of a risk assessment questionnaire. The risk assessment questionnaire includes considerations consistent with 2 CFR 200.332(b), including the entity’s prior experience and results of Single Audits, in addition to other factors. As part of our testing related subrecipient monitoring, we identified the following: 1. For 4 of 16 subrecipients selected for testwork BMC did not perform a risk assessment of the entity for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring related to the subaward. However, for these subrecipients, BMC did perform monitoring procedures, including review of invoices for reimbursement, review of Research Performance Progress Reports and review of Single Audit reports. Cause The condition found was primarily due to the monitoring procedures implemented by BMC do not include a review to ensure that a risk assessment is performed for each active subrecipient and BMC does not have a mechanism in place to provide the ALN at the time of disbursement of funds to the subrecipient. Possible Asserted Effect Failure to perform an annual risk assessment to determine appropriate subrecipient monitoring procedures may result in insufficient monitoring procedures being performed to detect subrecipient noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Failure to adequately communicate award identification information could result in the subrecipient not being able to adequately track and report the subawards received resulting in errors being reported on the schedule of expenditures of federal awards within a subrecipient’s annual single audit report and not being able to comply with required terms and conditions of the federal award. Questioned Costs None. Statistical Sampling The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendation We recommend BMC implement policies, procedures, and internal controls to ensure subrecipient risk assessments are performed for each subrecipient to determine the appropriate subrecipient monitoring is performed in accordance with 45 CFR 75.352(d) and 45 CFR 75.352(e). We recommend that BMC enhance its processes and internal controls over its reporting to the subrecipients of the federal program to ensure all award identification information required under 45 CFR 75.352(a) is provided to the subrecipients.
Federal Agency: United States Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Federal Program: R&D Cluster Federal Award Numbers: Various Federal Award Years: Various Reference: 2023 003 Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332, a pass through entity (PTE) must: (a) Ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the following information at the time of the subaward and if any of these data elements change, include the changes in subsequent subaward modification. When some of this information is not available, the pass through entity must provide the best information available to describe the Federal award and subaward. Required information includes: (xii) Assistance Listings number and Title; the pass through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each Federal award and the Assistance Listings Number at time of disbursement; (2 CFE section 200.332xxi) (b) Evaluate each subrecipient’s risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring described in paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section, which may include consideration of such factors as: (1) The subrecipient’s prior experience with the same or similar subawards; (2) The results of previous audits including whether or not the subrecipient receives a Single Audit in accordance with Subpart F of this part, and the extent to which the same or similar subaward has been audited as a major program; (3) Whether the subrecipient has new personnel or new or substantially changed systems; and (4) The extent and results of Federal awarding agency monitoring (e.g., if the subrecipient also receives Federal awards directly from a Federal awarding agency). Additionally, 45 CFR section 75 303(a) states the non Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition When subawards are made to subrecipients, the pass through entities are required to communicate the dollar amount made available under each Federal award and the Assistance Listings Number (ALN) at time of disbursement. BMC does not have system in place to provide the ALN at the time of disbursement of funds. During the year ended September 30, 2023, the BMC passed through $18,031,446 of federal funding to subrecipients. In order to assess the subrecipient’s risk of non compliance, BMC has subrecipient monitoring policies and procedures in place which include the use of a risk assessment questionnaire. The risk assessment questionnaire includes considerations consistent with 2 CFR 200.332(b), including the entity’s prior experience and results of Single Audits, in addition to other factors. As part of our testing related subrecipient monitoring, we identified the following: 1. For 4 of 16 subrecipients selected for testwork BMC did not perform a risk assessment of the entity for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring related to the subaward. However, for these subrecipients, BMC did perform monitoring procedures, including review of invoices for reimbursement, review of Research Performance Progress Reports and review of Single Audit reports. Cause The condition found was primarily due to the monitoring procedures implemented by BMC do not include a review to ensure that a risk assessment is performed for each active subrecipient and BMC does not have a mechanism in place to provide the ALN at the time of disbursement of funds to the subrecipient. Possible Asserted Effect Failure to perform an annual risk assessment to determine appropriate subrecipient monitoring procedures may result in insufficient monitoring procedures being performed to detect subrecipient noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Failure to adequately communicate award identification information could result in the subrecipient not being able to adequately track and report the subawards received resulting in errors being reported on the schedule of expenditures of federal awards within a subrecipient’s annual single audit report and not being able to comply with required terms and conditions of the federal award. Questioned Costs None. Statistical Sampling The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendation We recommend BMC implement policies, procedures, and internal controls to ensure subrecipient risk assessments are performed for each subrecipient to determine the appropriate subrecipient monitoring is performed in accordance with 45 CFR 75.352(d) and 45 CFR 75.352(e). We recommend that BMC enhance its processes and internal controls over its reporting to the subrecipients of the federal program to ensure all award identification information required under 45 CFR 75.352(a) is provided to the subrecipients.
Federal Agency: United States Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Federal Program: R&D Cluster Federal Award Numbers: Various Federal Award Years: Various Reference: 2023 003 Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332, a pass through entity (PTE) must: (a) Ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the following information at the time of the subaward and if any of these data elements change, include the changes in subsequent subaward modification. When some of this information is not available, the pass through entity must provide the best information available to describe the Federal award and subaward. Required information includes: (xii) Assistance Listings number and Title; the pass through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each Federal award and the Assistance Listings Number at time of disbursement; (2 CFE section 200.332xxi) (b) Evaluate each subrecipient’s risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring described in paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section, which may include consideration of such factors as: (1) The subrecipient’s prior experience with the same or similar subawards; (2) The results of previous audits including whether or not the subrecipient receives a Single Audit in accordance with Subpart F of this part, and the extent to which the same or similar subaward has been audited as a major program; (3) Whether the subrecipient has new personnel or new or substantially changed systems; and (4) The extent and results of Federal awarding agency monitoring (e.g., if the subrecipient also receives Federal awards directly from a Federal awarding agency). Additionally, 45 CFR section 75 303(a) states the non Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition When subawards are made to subrecipients, the pass through entities are required to communicate the dollar amount made available under each Federal award and the Assistance Listings Number (ALN) at time of disbursement. BMC does not have system in place to provide the ALN at the time of disbursement of funds. During the year ended September 30, 2023, the BMC passed through $18,031,446 of federal funding to subrecipients. In order to assess the subrecipient’s risk of non compliance, BMC has subrecipient monitoring policies and procedures in place which include the use of a risk assessment questionnaire. The risk assessment questionnaire includes considerations consistent with 2 CFR 200.332(b), including the entity’s prior experience and results of Single Audits, in addition to other factors. As part of our testing related subrecipient monitoring, we identified the following: 1. For 4 of 16 subrecipients selected for testwork BMC did not perform a risk assessment of the entity for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring related to the subaward. However, for these subrecipients, BMC did perform monitoring procedures, including review of invoices for reimbursement, review of Research Performance Progress Reports and review of Single Audit reports. Cause The condition found was primarily due to the monitoring procedures implemented by BMC do not include a review to ensure that a risk assessment is performed for each active subrecipient and BMC does not have a mechanism in place to provide the ALN at the time of disbursement of funds to the subrecipient. Possible Asserted Effect Failure to perform an annual risk assessment to determine appropriate subrecipient monitoring procedures may result in insufficient monitoring procedures being performed to detect subrecipient noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Failure to adequately communicate award identification information could result in the subrecipient not being able to adequately track and report the subawards received resulting in errors being reported on the schedule of expenditures of federal awards within a subrecipient’s annual single audit report and not being able to comply with required terms and conditions of the federal award. Questioned Costs None. Statistical Sampling The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendation We recommend BMC implement policies, procedures, and internal controls to ensure subrecipient risk assessments are performed for each subrecipient to determine the appropriate subrecipient monitoring is performed in accordance with 45 CFR 75.352(d) and 45 CFR 75.352(e). We recommend that BMC enhance its processes and internal controls over its reporting to the subrecipients of the federal program to ensure all award identification information required under 45 CFR 75.352(a) is provided to the subrecipients.
Federal Agency: United States Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Federal Program: R&D Cluster Federal Award Numbers: Various Federal Award Years: Various Reference: 2023 003 Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332, a pass through entity (PTE) must: (a) Ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the following information at the time of the subaward and if any of these data elements change, include the changes in subsequent subaward modification. When some of this information is not available, the pass through entity must provide the best information available to describe the Federal award and subaward. Required information includes: (xii) Assistance Listings number and Title; the pass through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each Federal award and the Assistance Listings Number at time of disbursement; (2 CFE section 200.332xxi) (b) Evaluate each subrecipient’s risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring described in paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section, which may include consideration of such factors as: (1) The subrecipient’s prior experience with the same or similar subawards; (2) The results of previous audits including whether or not the subrecipient receives a Single Audit in accordance with Subpart F of this part, and the extent to which the same or similar subaward has been audited as a major program; (3) Whether the subrecipient has new personnel or new or substantially changed systems; and (4) The extent and results of Federal awarding agency monitoring (e.g., if the subrecipient also receives Federal awards directly from a Federal awarding agency). Additionally, 45 CFR section 75 303(a) states the non Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition When subawards are made to subrecipients, the pass through entities are required to communicate the dollar amount made available under each Federal award and the Assistance Listings Number (ALN) at time of disbursement. BMC does not have system in place to provide the ALN at the time of disbursement of funds. During the year ended September 30, 2023, the BMC passed through $18,031,446 of federal funding to subrecipients. In order to assess the subrecipient’s risk of non compliance, BMC has subrecipient monitoring policies and procedures in place which include the use of a risk assessment questionnaire. The risk assessment questionnaire includes considerations consistent with 2 CFR 200.332(b), including the entity’s prior experience and results of Single Audits, in addition to other factors. As part of our testing related subrecipient monitoring, we identified the following: 1. For 4 of 16 subrecipients selected for testwork BMC did not perform a risk assessment of the entity for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring related to the subaward. However, for these subrecipients, BMC did perform monitoring procedures, including review of invoices for reimbursement, review of Research Performance Progress Reports and review of Single Audit reports. Cause The condition found was primarily due to the monitoring procedures implemented by BMC do not include a review to ensure that a risk assessment is performed for each active subrecipient and BMC does not have a mechanism in place to provide the ALN at the time of disbursement of funds to the subrecipient. Possible Asserted Effect Failure to perform an annual risk assessment to determine appropriate subrecipient monitoring procedures may result in insufficient monitoring procedures being performed to detect subrecipient noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Failure to adequately communicate award identification information could result in the subrecipient not being able to adequately track and report the subawards received resulting in errors being reported on the schedule of expenditures of federal awards within a subrecipient’s annual single audit report and not being able to comply with required terms and conditions of the federal award. Questioned Costs None. Statistical Sampling The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendation We recommend BMC implement policies, procedures, and internal controls to ensure subrecipient risk assessments are performed for each subrecipient to determine the appropriate subrecipient monitoring is performed in accordance with 45 CFR 75.352(d) and 45 CFR 75.352(e). We recommend that BMC enhance its processes and internal controls over its reporting to the subrecipients of the federal program to ensure all award identification information required under 45 CFR 75.352(a) is provided to the subrecipients.
Federal Agency: United States Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Federal Program: R&D Cluster Federal Award Numbers: Various Federal Award Years: Various Reference: 2023 003 Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332, a pass through entity (PTE) must: (a) Ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the following information at the time of the subaward and if any of these data elements change, include the changes in subsequent subaward modification. When some of this information is not available, the pass through entity must provide the best information available to describe the Federal award and subaward. Required information includes: (xii) Assistance Listings number and Title; the pass through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each Federal award and the Assistance Listings Number at time of disbursement; (2 CFE section 200.332xxi) (b) Evaluate each subrecipient’s risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring described in paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section, which may include consideration of such factors as: (1) The subrecipient’s prior experience with the same or similar subawards; (2) The results of previous audits including whether or not the subrecipient receives a Single Audit in accordance with Subpart F of this part, and the extent to which the same or similar subaward has been audited as a major program; (3) Whether the subrecipient has new personnel or new or substantially changed systems; and (4) The extent and results of Federal awarding agency monitoring (e.g., if the subrecipient also receives Federal awards directly from a Federal awarding agency). Additionally, 45 CFR section 75 303(a) states the non Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition When subawards are made to subrecipients, the pass through entities are required to communicate the dollar amount made available under each Federal award and the Assistance Listings Number (ALN) at time of disbursement. BMC does not have system in place to provide the ALN at the time of disbursement of funds. During the year ended September 30, 2023, the BMC passed through $18,031,446 of federal funding to subrecipients. In order to assess the subrecipient’s risk of non compliance, BMC has subrecipient monitoring policies and procedures in place which include the use of a risk assessment questionnaire. The risk assessment questionnaire includes considerations consistent with 2 CFR 200.332(b), including the entity’s prior experience and results of Single Audits, in addition to other factors. As part of our testing related subrecipient monitoring, we identified the following: 1. For 4 of 16 subrecipients selected for testwork BMC did not perform a risk assessment of the entity for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring related to the subaward. However, for these subrecipients, BMC did perform monitoring procedures, including review of invoices for reimbursement, review of Research Performance Progress Reports and review of Single Audit reports. Cause The condition found was primarily due to the monitoring procedures implemented by BMC do not include a review to ensure that a risk assessment is performed for each active subrecipient and BMC does not have a mechanism in place to provide the ALN at the time of disbursement of funds to the subrecipient. Possible Asserted Effect Failure to perform an annual risk assessment to determine appropriate subrecipient monitoring procedures may result in insufficient monitoring procedures being performed to detect subrecipient noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Failure to adequately communicate award identification information could result in the subrecipient not being able to adequately track and report the subawards received resulting in errors being reported on the schedule of expenditures of federal awards within a subrecipient’s annual single audit report and not being able to comply with required terms and conditions of the federal award. Questioned Costs None. Statistical Sampling The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendation We recommend BMC implement policies, procedures, and internal controls to ensure subrecipient risk assessments are performed for each subrecipient to determine the appropriate subrecipient monitoring is performed in accordance with 45 CFR 75.352(d) and 45 CFR 75.352(e). We recommend that BMC enhance its processes and internal controls over its reporting to the subrecipients of the federal program to ensure all award identification information required under 45 CFR 75.352(a) is provided to the subrecipients.
Federal Agency: United States Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Federal Program: R&D Cluster Federal Award Numbers: Various Federal Award Years: Various Reference: 2023 003 Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332, a pass through entity (PTE) must: (a) Ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the following information at the time of the subaward and if any of these data elements change, include the changes in subsequent subaward modification. When some of this information is not available, the pass through entity must provide the best information available to describe the Federal award and subaward. Required information includes: (xii) Assistance Listings number and Title; the pass through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each Federal award and the Assistance Listings Number at time of disbursement; (2 CFE section 200.332xxi) (b) Evaluate each subrecipient’s risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring described in paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section, which may include consideration of such factors as: (1) The subrecipient’s prior experience with the same or similar subawards; (2) The results of previous audits including whether or not the subrecipient receives a Single Audit in accordance with Subpart F of this part, and the extent to which the same or similar subaward has been audited as a major program; (3) Whether the subrecipient has new personnel or new or substantially changed systems; and (4) The extent and results of Federal awarding agency monitoring (e.g., if the subrecipient also receives Federal awards directly from a Federal awarding agency). Additionally, 45 CFR section 75 303(a) states the non Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition When subawards are made to subrecipients, the pass through entities are required to communicate the dollar amount made available under each Federal award and the Assistance Listings Number (ALN) at time of disbursement. BMC does not have system in place to provide the ALN at the time of disbursement of funds. During the year ended September 30, 2023, the BMC passed through $18,031,446 of federal funding to subrecipients. In order to assess the subrecipient’s risk of non compliance, BMC has subrecipient monitoring policies and procedures in place which include the use of a risk assessment questionnaire. The risk assessment questionnaire includes considerations consistent with 2 CFR 200.332(b), including the entity’s prior experience and results of Single Audits, in addition to other factors. As part of our testing related subrecipient monitoring, we identified the following: 1. For 4 of 16 subrecipients selected for testwork BMC did not perform a risk assessment of the entity for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring related to the subaward. However, for these subrecipients, BMC did perform monitoring procedures, including review of invoices for reimbursement, review of Research Performance Progress Reports and review of Single Audit reports. Cause The condition found was primarily due to the monitoring procedures implemented by BMC do not include a review to ensure that a risk assessment is performed for each active subrecipient and BMC does not have a mechanism in place to provide the ALN at the time of disbursement of funds to the subrecipient. Possible Asserted Effect Failure to perform an annual risk assessment to determine appropriate subrecipient monitoring procedures may result in insufficient monitoring procedures being performed to detect subrecipient noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Failure to adequately communicate award identification information could result in the subrecipient not being able to adequately track and report the subawards received resulting in errors being reported on the schedule of expenditures of federal awards within a subrecipient’s annual single audit report and not being able to comply with required terms and conditions of the federal award. Questioned Costs None. Statistical Sampling The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendation We recommend BMC implement policies, procedures, and internal controls to ensure subrecipient risk assessments are performed for each subrecipient to determine the appropriate subrecipient monitoring is performed in accordance with 45 CFR 75.352(d) and 45 CFR 75.352(e). We recommend that BMC enhance its processes and internal controls over its reporting to the subrecipients of the federal program to ensure all award identification information required under 45 CFR 75.352(a) is provided to the subrecipients.
Federal Agency: United States Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Federal Program: R&D Cluster Federal Award Numbers: Various Federal Award Years: Various Reference: 2023 003 Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332, a pass through entity (PTE) must: (a) Ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the following information at the time of the subaward and if any of these data elements change, include the changes in subsequent subaward modification. When some of this information is not available, the pass through entity must provide the best information available to describe the Federal award and subaward. Required information includes: (xii) Assistance Listings number and Title; the pass through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each Federal award and the Assistance Listings Number at time of disbursement; (2 CFE section 200.332xxi) (b) Evaluate each subrecipient’s risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring described in paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section, which may include consideration of such factors as: (1) The subrecipient’s prior experience with the same or similar subawards; (2) The results of previous audits including whether or not the subrecipient receives a Single Audit in accordance with Subpart F of this part, and the extent to which the same or similar subaward has been audited as a major program; (3) Whether the subrecipient has new personnel or new or substantially changed systems; and (4) The extent and results of Federal awarding agency monitoring (e.g., if the subrecipient also receives Federal awards directly from a Federal awarding agency). Additionally, 45 CFR section 75 303(a) states the non Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition When subawards are made to subrecipients, the pass through entities are required to communicate the dollar amount made available under each Federal award and the Assistance Listings Number (ALN) at time of disbursement. BMC does not have system in place to provide the ALN at the time of disbursement of funds. During the year ended September 30, 2023, the BMC passed through $18,031,446 of federal funding to subrecipients. In order to assess the subrecipient’s risk of non compliance, BMC has subrecipient monitoring policies and procedures in place which include the use of a risk assessment questionnaire. The risk assessment questionnaire includes considerations consistent with 2 CFR 200.332(b), including the entity’s prior experience and results of Single Audits, in addition to other factors. As part of our testing related subrecipient monitoring, we identified the following: 1. For 4 of 16 subrecipients selected for testwork BMC did not perform a risk assessment of the entity for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring related to the subaward. However, for these subrecipients, BMC did perform monitoring procedures, including review of invoices for reimbursement, review of Research Performance Progress Reports and review of Single Audit reports. Cause The condition found was primarily due to the monitoring procedures implemented by BMC do not include a review to ensure that a risk assessment is performed for each active subrecipient and BMC does not have a mechanism in place to provide the ALN at the time of disbursement of funds to the subrecipient. Possible Asserted Effect Failure to perform an annual risk assessment to determine appropriate subrecipient monitoring procedures may result in insufficient monitoring procedures being performed to detect subrecipient noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Failure to adequately communicate award identification information could result in the subrecipient not being able to adequately track and report the subawards received resulting in errors being reported on the schedule of expenditures of federal awards within a subrecipient’s annual single audit report and not being able to comply with required terms and conditions of the federal award. Questioned Costs None. Statistical Sampling The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendation We recommend BMC implement policies, procedures, and internal controls to ensure subrecipient risk assessments are performed for each subrecipient to determine the appropriate subrecipient monitoring is performed in accordance with 45 CFR 75.352(d) and 45 CFR 75.352(e). We recommend that BMC enhance its processes and internal controls over its reporting to the subrecipients of the federal program to ensure all award identification information required under 45 CFR 75.352(a) is provided to the subrecipients.
Federal Agency: United States Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Federal Program: R&D Cluster Federal Award Numbers: Various Federal Award Years: Various Reference: 2023 003 Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332, a pass through entity (PTE) must: (a) Ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the following information at the time of the subaward and if any of these data elements change, include the changes in subsequent subaward modification. When some of this information is not available, the pass through entity must provide the best information available to describe the Federal award and subaward. Required information includes: (xii) Assistance Listings number and Title; the pass through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each Federal award and the Assistance Listings Number at time of disbursement; (2 CFE section 200.332xxi) (b) Evaluate each subrecipient’s risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring described in paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section, which may include consideration of such factors as: (1) The subrecipient’s prior experience with the same or similar subawards; (2) The results of previous audits including whether or not the subrecipient receives a Single Audit in accordance with Subpart F of this part, and the extent to which the same or similar subaward has been audited as a major program; (3) Whether the subrecipient has new personnel or new or substantially changed systems; and (4) The extent and results of Federal awarding agency monitoring (e.g., if the subrecipient also receives Federal awards directly from a Federal awarding agency). Additionally, 45 CFR section 75 303(a) states the non Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition When subawards are made to subrecipients, the pass through entities are required to communicate the dollar amount made available under each Federal award and the Assistance Listings Number (ALN) at time of disbursement. BMC does not have system in place to provide the ALN at the time of disbursement of funds. During the year ended September 30, 2023, the BMC passed through $18,031,446 of federal funding to subrecipients. In order to assess the subrecipient’s risk of non compliance, BMC has subrecipient monitoring policies and procedures in place which include the use of a risk assessment questionnaire. The risk assessment questionnaire includes considerations consistent with 2 CFR 200.332(b), including the entity’s prior experience and results of Single Audits, in addition to other factors. As part of our testing related subrecipient monitoring, we identified the following: 1. For 4 of 16 subrecipients selected for testwork BMC did not perform a risk assessment of the entity for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring related to the subaward. However, for these subrecipients, BMC did perform monitoring procedures, including review of invoices for reimbursement, review of Research Performance Progress Reports and review of Single Audit reports. Cause The condition found was primarily due to the monitoring procedures implemented by BMC do not include a review to ensure that a risk assessment is performed for each active subrecipient and BMC does not have a mechanism in place to provide the ALN at the time of disbursement of funds to the subrecipient. Possible Asserted Effect Failure to perform an annual risk assessment to determine appropriate subrecipient monitoring procedures may result in insufficient monitoring procedures being performed to detect subrecipient noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Failure to adequately communicate award identification information could result in the subrecipient not being able to adequately track and report the subawards received resulting in errors being reported on the schedule of expenditures of federal awards within a subrecipient’s annual single audit report and not being able to comply with required terms and conditions of the federal award. Questioned Costs None. Statistical Sampling The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendation We recommend BMC implement policies, procedures, and internal controls to ensure subrecipient risk assessments are performed for each subrecipient to determine the appropriate subrecipient monitoring is performed in accordance with 45 CFR 75.352(d) and 45 CFR 75.352(e). We recommend that BMC enhance its processes and internal controls over its reporting to the subrecipients of the federal program to ensure all award identification information required under 45 CFR 75.352(a) is provided to the subrecipients.
Federal Agency: United States Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Federal Program: R&D Cluster Federal Award Numbers: Various Federal Award Years: Various Reference: 2023 003 Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332, a pass through entity (PTE) must: (a) Ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the following information at the time of the subaward and if any of these data elements change, include the changes in subsequent subaward modification. When some of this information is not available, the pass through entity must provide the best information available to describe the Federal award and subaward. Required information includes: (xii) Assistance Listings number and Title; the pass through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each Federal award and the Assistance Listings Number at time of disbursement; (2 CFE section 200.332xxi) (b) Evaluate each subrecipient’s risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring described in paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section, which may include consideration of such factors as: (1) The subrecipient’s prior experience with the same or similar subawards; (2) The results of previous audits including whether or not the subrecipient receives a Single Audit in accordance with Subpart F of this part, and the extent to which the same or similar subaward has been audited as a major program; (3) Whether the subrecipient has new personnel or new or substantially changed systems; and (4) The extent and results of Federal awarding agency monitoring (e.g., if the subrecipient also receives Federal awards directly from a Federal awarding agency). Additionally, 45 CFR section 75 303(a) states the non Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition When subawards are made to subrecipients, the pass through entities are required to communicate the dollar amount made available under each Federal award and the Assistance Listings Number (ALN) at time of disbursement. BMC does not have system in place to provide the ALN at the time of disbursement of funds. During the year ended September 30, 2023, the BMC passed through $18,031,446 of federal funding to subrecipients. In order to assess the subrecipient’s risk of non compliance, BMC has subrecipient monitoring policies and procedures in place which include the use of a risk assessment questionnaire. The risk assessment questionnaire includes considerations consistent with 2 CFR 200.332(b), including the entity’s prior experience and results of Single Audits, in addition to other factors. As part of our testing related subrecipient monitoring, we identified the following: 1. For 4 of 16 subrecipients selected for testwork BMC did not perform a risk assessment of the entity for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring related to the subaward. However, for these subrecipients, BMC did perform monitoring procedures, including review of invoices for reimbursement, review of Research Performance Progress Reports and review of Single Audit reports. Cause The condition found was primarily due to the monitoring procedures implemented by BMC do not include a review to ensure that a risk assessment is performed for each active subrecipient and BMC does not have a mechanism in place to provide the ALN at the time of disbursement of funds to the subrecipient. Possible Asserted Effect Failure to perform an annual risk assessment to determine appropriate subrecipient monitoring procedures may result in insufficient monitoring procedures being performed to detect subrecipient noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Failure to adequately communicate award identification information could result in the subrecipient not being able to adequately track and report the subawards received resulting in errors being reported on the schedule of expenditures of federal awards within a subrecipient’s annual single audit report and not being able to comply with required terms and conditions of the federal award. Questioned Costs None. Statistical Sampling The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendation We recommend BMC implement policies, procedures, and internal controls to ensure subrecipient risk assessments are performed for each subrecipient to determine the appropriate subrecipient monitoring is performed in accordance with 45 CFR 75.352(d) and 45 CFR 75.352(e). We recommend that BMC enhance its processes and internal controls over its reporting to the subrecipients of the federal program to ensure all award identification information required under 45 CFR 75.352(a) is provided to the subrecipients.
Federal Agency: United States Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Federal Program: R&D Cluster Federal Award Numbers: Various Federal Award Years: Various Reference: 2023 003 Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332, a pass through entity (PTE) must: (a) Ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the following information at the time of the subaward and if any of these data elements change, include the changes in subsequent subaward modification. When some of this information is not available, the pass through entity must provide the best information available to describe the Federal award and subaward. Required information includes: (xii) Assistance Listings number and Title; the pass through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each Federal award and the Assistance Listings Number at time of disbursement; (2 CFE section 200.332xxi) (b) Evaluate each subrecipient’s risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring described in paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section, which may include consideration of such factors as: (1) The subrecipient’s prior experience with the same or similar subawards; (2) The results of previous audits including whether or not the subrecipient receives a Single Audit in accordance with Subpart F of this part, and the extent to which the same or similar subaward has been audited as a major program; (3) Whether the subrecipient has new personnel or new or substantially changed systems; and (4) The extent and results of Federal awarding agency monitoring (e.g., if the subrecipient also receives Federal awards directly from a Federal awarding agency). Additionally, 45 CFR section 75 303(a) states the non Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition When subawards are made to subrecipients, the pass through entities are required to communicate the dollar amount made available under each Federal award and the Assistance Listings Number (ALN) at time of disbursement. BMC does not have system in place to provide the ALN at the time of disbursement of funds. During the year ended September 30, 2023, the BMC passed through $18,031,446 of federal funding to subrecipients. In order to assess the subrecipient’s risk of non compliance, BMC has subrecipient monitoring policies and procedures in place which include the use of a risk assessment questionnaire. The risk assessment questionnaire includes considerations consistent with 2 CFR 200.332(b), including the entity’s prior experience and results of Single Audits, in addition to other factors. As part of our testing related subrecipient monitoring, we identified the following: 1. For 4 of 16 subrecipients selected for testwork BMC did not perform a risk assessment of the entity for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring related to the subaward. However, for these subrecipients, BMC did perform monitoring procedures, including review of invoices for reimbursement, review of Research Performance Progress Reports and review of Single Audit reports. Cause The condition found was primarily due to the monitoring procedures implemented by BMC do not include a review to ensure that a risk assessment is performed for each active subrecipient and BMC does not have a mechanism in place to provide the ALN at the time of disbursement of funds to the subrecipient. Possible Asserted Effect Failure to perform an annual risk assessment to determine appropriate subrecipient monitoring procedures may result in insufficient monitoring procedures being performed to detect subrecipient noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Failure to adequately communicate award identification information could result in the subrecipient not being able to adequately track and report the subawards received resulting in errors being reported on the schedule of expenditures of federal awards within a subrecipient’s annual single audit report and not being able to comply with required terms and conditions of the federal award. Questioned Costs None. Statistical Sampling The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendation We recommend BMC implement policies, procedures, and internal controls to ensure subrecipient risk assessments are performed for each subrecipient to determine the appropriate subrecipient monitoring is performed in accordance with 45 CFR 75.352(d) and 45 CFR 75.352(e). We recommend that BMC enhance its processes and internal controls over its reporting to the subrecipients of the federal program to ensure all award identification information required under 45 CFR 75.352(a) is provided to the subrecipients.
Federal Agency: United States Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Federal Program: R&D Cluster Federal Award Numbers: Various Federal Award Years: Various Reference: 2023 003 Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332, a pass through entity (PTE) must: (a) Ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the following information at the time of the subaward and if any of these data elements change, include the changes in subsequent subaward modification. When some of this information is not available, the pass through entity must provide the best information available to describe the Federal award and subaward. Required information includes: (xii) Assistance Listings number and Title; the pass through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each Federal award and the Assistance Listings Number at time of disbursement; (2 CFE section 200.332xxi) (b) Evaluate each subrecipient’s risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring described in paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section, which may include consideration of such factors as: (1) The subrecipient’s prior experience with the same or similar subawards; (2) The results of previous audits including whether or not the subrecipient receives a Single Audit in accordance with Subpart F of this part, and the extent to which the same or similar subaward has been audited as a major program; (3) Whether the subrecipient has new personnel or new or substantially changed systems; and (4) The extent and results of Federal awarding agency monitoring (e.g., if the subrecipient also receives Federal awards directly from a Federal awarding agency). Additionally, 45 CFR section 75 303(a) states the non Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition When subawards are made to subrecipients, the pass through entities are required to communicate the dollar amount made available under each Federal award and the Assistance Listings Number (ALN) at time of disbursement. BMC does not have system in place to provide the ALN at the time of disbursement of funds. During the year ended September 30, 2023, the BMC passed through $18,031,446 of federal funding to subrecipients. In order to assess the subrecipient’s risk of non compliance, BMC has subrecipient monitoring policies and procedures in place which include the use of a risk assessment questionnaire. The risk assessment questionnaire includes considerations consistent with 2 CFR 200.332(b), including the entity’s prior experience and results of Single Audits, in addition to other factors. As part of our testing related subrecipient monitoring, we identified the following: 1. For 4 of 16 subrecipients selected for testwork BMC did not perform a risk assessment of the entity for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring related to the subaward. However, for these subrecipients, BMC did perform monitoring procedures, including review of invoices for reimbursement, review of Research Performance Progress Reports and review of Single Audit reports. Cause The condition found was primarily due to the monitoring procedures implemented by BMC do not include a review to ensure that a risk assessment is performed for each active subrecipient and BMC does not have a mechanism in place to provide the ALN at the time of disbursement of funds to the subrecipient. Possible Asserted Effect Failure to perform an annual risk assessment to determine appropriate subrecipient monitoring procedures may result in insufficient monitoring procedures being performed to detect subrecipient noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Failure to adequately communicate award identification information could result in the subrecipient not being able to adequately track and report the subawards received resulting in errors being reported on the schedule of expenditures of federal awards within a subrecipient’s annual single audit report and not being able to comply with required terms and conditions of the federal award. Questioned Costs None. Statistical Sampling The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendation We recommend BMC implement policies, procedures, and internal controls to ensure subrecipient risk assessments are performed for each subrecipient to determine the appropriate subrecipient monitoring is performed in accordance with 45 CFR 75.352(d) and 45 CFR 75.352(e). We recommend that BMC enhance its processes and internal controls over its reporting to the subrecipients of the federal program to ensure all award identification information required under 45 CFR 75.352(a) is provided to the subrecipients.
Federal Agency: United States Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Federal Program: R&D Cluster Federal Award Numbers: Various Federal Award Years: Various Reference: 2023 003 Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332, a pass through entity (PTE) must: (a) Ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the following information at the time of the subaward and if any of these data elements change, include the changes in subsequent subaward modification. When some of this information is not available, the pass through entity must provide the best information available to describe the Federal award and subaward. Required information includes: (xii) Assistance Listings number and Title; the pass through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each Federal award and the Assistance Listings Number at time of disbursement; (2 CFE section 200.332xxi) (b) Evaluate each subrecipient’s risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring described in paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section, which may include consideration of such factors as: (1) The subrecipient’s prior experience with the same or similar subawards; (2) The results of previous audits including whether or not the subrecipient receives a Single Audit in accordance with Subpart F of this part, and the extent to which the same or similar subaward has been audited as a major program; (3) Whether the subrecipient has new personnel or new or substantially changed systems; and (4) The extent and results of Federal awarding agency monitoring (e.g., if the subrecipient also receives Federal awards directly from a Federal awarding agency). Additionally, 45 CFR section 75 303(a) states the non Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition When subawards are made to subrecipients, the pass through entities are required to communicate the dollar amount made available under each Federal award and the Assistance Listings Number (ALN) at time of disbursement. BMC does not have system in place to provide the ALN at the time of disbursement of funds. During the year ended September 30, 2023, the BMC passed through $18,031,446 of federal funding to subrecipients. In order to assess the subrecipient’s risk of non compliance, BMC has subrecipient monitoring policies and procedures in place which include the use of a risk assessment questionnaire. The risk assessment questionnaire includes considerations consistent with 2 CFR 200.332(b), including the entity’s prior experience and results of Single Audits, in addition to other factors. As part of our testing related subrecipient monitoring, we identified the following: 1. For 4 of 16 subrecipients selected for testwork BMC did not perform a risk assessment of the entity for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring related to the subaward. However, for these subrecipients, BMC did perform monitoring procedures, including review of invoices for reimbursement, review of Research Performance Progress Reports and review of Single Audit reports. Cause The condition found was primarily due to the monitoring procedures implemented by BMC do not include a review to ensure that a risk assessment is performed for each active subrecipient and BMC does not have a mechanism in place to provide the ALN at the time of disbursement of funds to the subrecipient. Possible Asserted Effect Failure to perform an annual risk assessment to determine appropriate subrecipient monitoring procedures may result in insufficient monitoring procedures being performed to detect subrecipient noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Failure to adequately communicate award identification information could result in the subrecipient not being able to adequately track and report the subawards received resulting in errors being reported on the schedule of expenditures of federal awards within a subrecipient’s annual single audit report and not being able to comply with required terms and conditions of the federal award. Questioned Costs None. Statistical Sampling The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendation We recommend BMC implement policies, procedures, and internal controls to ensure subrecipient risk assessments are performed for each subrecipient to determine the appropriate subrecipient monitoring is performed in accordance with 45 CFR 75.352(d) and 45 CFR 75.352(e). We recommend that BMC enhance its processes and internal controls over its reporting to the subrecipients of the federal program to ensure all award identification information required under 45 CFR 75.352(a) is provided to the subrecipients.
Federal Agency: United States Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Federal Program: R&D Cluster Federal Award Numbers: Various Federal Award Years: Various Reference: 2023 003 Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332, a pass through entity (PTE) must: (a) Ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the following information at the time of the subaward and if any of these data elements change, include the changes in subsequent subaward modification. When some of this information is not available, the pass through entity must provide the best information available to describe the Federal award and subaward. Required information includes: (xii) Assistance Listings number and Title; the pass through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each Federal award and the Assistance Listings Number at time of disbursement; (2 CFE section 200.332xxi) (b) Evaluate each subrecipient’s risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring described in paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section, which may include consideration of such factors as: (1) The subrecipient’s prior experience with the same or similar subawards; (2) The results of previous audits including whether or not the subrecipient receives a Single Audit in accordance with Subpart F of this part, and the extent to which the same or similar subaward has been audited as a major program; (3) Whether the subrecipient has new personnel or new or substantially changed systems; and (4) The extent and results of Federal awarding agency monitoring (e.g., if the subrecipient also receives Federal awards directly from a Federal awarding agency). Additionally, 45 CFR section 75 303(a) states the non Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition When subawards are made to subrecipients, the pass through entities are required to communicate the dollar amount made available under each Federal award and the Assistance Listings Number (ALN) at time of disbursement. BMC does not have system in place to provide the ALN at the time of disbursement of funds. During the year ended September 30, 2023, the BMC passed through $18,031,446 of federal funding to subrecipients. In order to assess the subrecipient’s risk of non compliance, BMC has subrecipient monitoring policies and procedures in place which include the use of a risk assessment questionnaire. The risk assessment questionnaire includes considerations consistent with 2 CFR 200.332(b), including the entity’s prior experience and results of Single Audits, in addition to other factors. As part of our testing related subrecipient monitoring, we identified the following: 1. For 4 of 16 subrecipients selected for testwork BMC did not perform a risk assessment of the entity for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring related to the subaward. However, for these subrecipients, BMC did perform monitoring procedures, including review of invoices for reimbursement, review of Research Performance Progress Reports and review of Single Audit reports. Cause The condition found was primarily due to the monitoring procedures implemented by BMC do not include a review to ensure that a risk assessment is performed for each active subrecipient and BMC does not have a mechanism in place to provide the ALN at the time of disbursement of funds to the subrecipient. Possible Asserted Effect Failure to perform an annual risk assessment to determine appropriate subrecipient monitoring procedures may result in insufficient monitoring procedures being performed to detect subrecipient noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Failure to adequately communicate award identification information could result in the subrecipient not being able to adequately track and report the subawards received resulting in errors being reported on the schedule of expenditures of federal awards within a subrecipient’s annual single audit report and not being able to comply with required terms and conditions of the federal award. Questioned Costs None. Statistical Sampling The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendation We recommend BMC implement policies, procedures, and internal controls to ensure subrecipient risk assessments are performed for each subrecipient to determine the appropriate subrecipient monitoring is performed in accordance with 45 CFR 75.352(d) and 45 CFR 75.352(e). We recommend that BMC enhance its processes and internal controls over its reporting to the subrecipients of the federal program to ensure all award identification information required under 45 CFR 75.352(a) is provided to the subrecipients.
Federal Agency: United States Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Federal Program: R&D Cluster Federal Award Numbers: Various Federal Award Years: Various Reference: 2023 003 Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332, a pass through entity (PTE) must: (a) Ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the following information at the time of the subaward and if any of these data elements change, include the changes in subsequent subaward modification. When some of this information is not available, the pass through entity must provide the best information available to describe the Federal award and subaward. Required information includes: (xii) Assistance Listings number and Title; the pass through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each Federal award and the Assistance Listings Number at time of disbursement; (2 CFE section 200.332xxi) (b) Evaluate each subrecipient’s risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring described in paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section, which may include consideration of such factors as: (1) The subrecipient’s prior experience with the same or similar subawards; (2) The results of previous audits including whether or not the subrecipient receives a Single Audit in accordance with Subpart F of this part, and the extent to which the same or similar subaward has been audited as a major program; (3) Whether the subrecipient has new personnel or new or substantially changed systems; and (4) The extent and results of Federal awarding agency monitoring (e.g., if the subrecipient also receives Federal awards directly from a Federal awarding agency). Additionally, 45 CFR section 75 303(a) states the non Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition When subawards are made to subrecipients, the pass through entities are required to communicate the dollar amount made available under each Federal award and the Assistance Listings Number (ALN) at time of disbursement. BMC does not have system in place to provide the ALN at the time of disbursement of funds. During the year ended September 30, 2023, the BMC passed through $18,031,446 of federal funding to subrecipients. In order to assess the subrecipient’s risk of non compliance, BMC has subrecipient monitoring policies and procedures in place which include the use of a risk assessment questionnaire. The risk assessment questionnaire includes considerations consistent with 2 CFR 200.332(b), including the entity’s prior experience and results of Single Audits, in addition to other factors. As part of our testing related subrecipient monitoring, we identified the following: 1. For 4 of 16 subrecipients selected for testwork BMC did not perform a risk assessment of the entity for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring related to the subaward. However, for these subrecipients, BMC did perform monitoring procedures, including review of invoices for reimbursement, review of Research Performance Progress Reports and review of Single Audit reports. Cause The condition found was primarily due to the monitoring procedures implemented by BMC do not include a review to ensure that a risk assessment is performed for each active subrecipient and BMC does not have a mechanism in place to provide the ALN at the time of disbursement of funds to the subrecipient. Possible Asserted Effect Failure to perform an annual risk assessment to determine appropriate subrecipient monitoring procedures may result in insufficient monitoring procedures being performed to detect subrecipient noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Failure to adequately communicate award identification information could result in the subrecipient not being able to adequately track and report the subawards received resulting in errors being reported on the schedule of expenditures of federal awards within a subrecipient’s annual single audit report and not being able to comply with required terms and conditions of the federal award. Questioned Costs None. Statistical Sampling The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendation We recommend BMC implement policies, procedures, and internal controls to ensure subrecipient risk assessments are performed for each subrecipient to determine the appropriate subrecipient monitoring is performed in accordance with 45 CFR 75.352(d) and 45 CFR 75.352(e). We recommend that BMC enhance its processes and internal controls over its reporting to the subrecipients of the federal program to ensure all award identification information required under 45 CFR 75.352(a) is provided to the subrecipients.
Federal Agency: United States Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Federal Program: R&D Cluster Federal Award Numbers: Various Federal Award Years: Various Reference: 2023 003 Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332, a pass through entity (PTE) must: (a) Ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the following information at the time of the subaward and if any of these data elements change, include the changes in subsequent subaward modification. When some of this information is not available, the pass through entity must provide the best information available to describe the Federal award and subaward. Required information includes: (xii) Assistance Listings number and Title; the pass through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each Federal award and the Assistance Listings Number at time of disbursement; (2 CFE section 200.332xxi) (b) Evaluate each subrecipient’s risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring described in paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section, which may include consideration of such factors as: (1) The subrecipient’s prior experience with the same or similar subawards; (2) The results of previous audits including whether or not the subrecipient receives a Single Audit in accordance with Subpart F of this part, and the extent to which the same or similar subaward has been audited as a major program; (3) Whether the subrecipient has new personnel or new or substantially changed systems; and (4) The extent and results of Federal awarding agency monitoring (e.g., if the subrecipient also receives Federal awards directly from a Federal awarding agency). Additionally, 45 CFR section 75 303(a) states the non Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition When subawards are made to subrecipients, the pass through entities are required to communicate the dollar amount made available under each Federal award and the Assistance Listings Number (ALN) at time of disbursement. BMC does not have system in place to provide the ALN at the time of disbursement of funds. During the year ended September 30, 2023, the BMC passed through $18,031,446 of federal funding to subrecipients. In order to assess the subrecipient’s risk of non compliance, BMC has subrecipient monitoring policies and procedures in place which include the use of a risk assessment questionnaire. The risk assessment questionnaire includes considerations consistent with 2 CFR 200.332(b), including the entity’s prior experience and results of Single Audits, in addition to other factors. As part of our testing related subrecipient monitoring, we identified the following: 1. For 4 of 16 subrecipients selected for testwork BMC did not perform a risk assessment of the entity for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring related to the subaward. However, for these subrecipients, BMC did perform monitoring procedures, including review of invoices for reimbursement, review of Research Performance Progress Reports and review of Single Audit reports. Cause The condition found was primarily due to the monitoring procedures implemented by BMC do not include a review to ensure that a risk assessment is performed for each active subrecipient and BMC does not have a mechanism in place to provide the ALN at the time of disbursement of funds to the subrecipient. Possible Asserted Effect Failure to perform an annual risk assessment to determine appropriate subrecipient monitoring procedures may result in insufficient monitoring procedures being performed to detect subrecipient noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Failure to adequately communicate award identification information could result in the subrecipient not being able to adequately track and report the subawards received resulting in errors being reported on the schedule of expenditures of federal awards within a subrecipient’s annual single audit report and not being able to comply with required terms and conditions of the federal award. Questioned Costs None. Statistical Sampling The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendation We recommend BMC implement policies, procedures, and internal controls to ensure subrecipient risk assessments are performed for each subrecipient to determine the appropriate subrecipient monitoring is performed in accordance with 45 CFR 75.352(d) and 45 CFR 75.352(e). We recommend that BMC enhance its processes and internal controls over its reporting to the subrecipients of the federal program to ensure all award identification information required under 45 CFR 75.352(a) is provided to the subrecipients.
Federal Agency: United States Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Federal Program: R&D Cluster Federal Award Numbers: Various Federal Award Years: Various Reference: 2023 003 Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332, a pass through entity (PTE) must: (a) Ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the following information at the time of the subaward and if any of these data elements change, include the changes in subsequent subaward modification. When some of this information is not available, the pass through entity must provide the best information available to describe the Federal award and subaward. Required information includes: (xii) Assistance Listings number and Title; the pass through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each Federal award and the Assistance Listings Number at time of disbursement; (2 CFE section 200.332xxi) (b) Evaluate each subrecipient’s risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring described in paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section, which may include consideration of such factors as: (1) The subrecipient’s prior experience with the same or similar subawards; (2) The results of previous audits including whether or not the subrecipient receives a Single Audit in accordance with Subpart F of this part, and the extent to which the same or similar subaward has been audited as a major program; (3) Whether the subrecipient has new personnel or new or substantially changed systems; and (4) The extent and results of Federal awarding agency monitoring (e.g., if the subrecipient also receives Federal awards directly from a Federal awarding agency). Additionally, 45 CFR section 75 303(a) states the non Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition When subawards are made to subrecipients, the pass through entities are required to communicate the dollar amount made available under each Federal award and the Assistance Listings Number (ALN) at time of disbursement. BMC does not have system in place to provide the ALN at the time of disbursement of funds. During the year ended September 30, 2023, the BMC passed through $18,031,446 of federal funding to subrecipients. In order to assess the subrecipient’s risk of non compliance, BMC has subrecipient monitoring policies and procedures in place which include the use of a risk assessment questionnaire. The risk assessment questionnaire includes considerations consistent with 2 CFR 200.332(b), including the entity’s prior experience and results of Single Audits, in addition to other factors. As part of our testing related subrecipient monitoring, we identified the following: 1. For 4 of 16 subrecipients selected for testwork BMC did not perform a risk assessment of the entity for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring related to the subaward. However, for these subrecipients, BMC did perform monitoring procedures, including review of invoices for reimbursement, review of Research Performance Progress Reports and review of Single Audit reports. Cause The condition found was primarily due to the monitoring procedures implemented by BMC do not include a review to ensure that a risk assessment is performed for each active subrecipient and BMC does not have a mechanism in place to provide the ALN at the time of disbursement of funds to the subrecipient. Possible Asserted Effect Failure to perform an annual risk assessment to determine appropriate subrecipient monitoring procedures may result in insufficient monitoring procedures being performed to detect subrecipient noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Failure to adequately communicate award identification information could result in the subrecipient not being able to adequately track and report the subawards received resulting in errors being reported on the schedule of expenditures of federal awards within a subrecipient’s annual single audit report and not being able to comply with required terms and conditions of the federal award. Questioned Costs None. Statistical Sampling The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendation We recommend BMC implement policies, procedures, and internal controls to ensure subrecipient risk assessments are performed for each subrecipient to determine the appropriate subrecipient monitoring is performed in accordance with 45 CFR 75.352(d) and 45 CFR 75.352(e). We recommend that BMC enhance its processes and internal controls over its reporting to the subrecipients of the federal program to ensure all award identification information required under 45 CFR 75.352(a) is provided to the subrecipients.
Federal Agency: United States Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Federal Program: R&D Cluster Federal Award Numbers: Various Federal Award Years: Various Reference: 2023 003 Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332, a pass through entity (PTE) must: (a) Ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the following information at the time of the subaward and if any of these data elements change, include the changes in subsequent subaward modification. When some of this information is not available, the pass through entity must provide the best information available to describe the Federal award and subaward. Required information includes: (xii) Assistance Listings number and Title; the pass through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each Federal award and the Assistance Listings Number at time of disbursement; (2 CFE section 200.332xxi) (b) Evaluate each subrecipient’s risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring described in paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section, which may include consideration of such factors as: (1) The subrecipient’s prior experience with the same or similar subawards; (2) The results of previous audits including whether or not the subrecipient receives a Single Audit in accordance with Subpart F of this part, and the extent to which the same or similar subaward has been audited as a major program; (3) Whether the subrecipient has new personnel or new or substantially changed systems; and (4) The extent and results of Federal awarding agency monitoring (e.g., if the subrecipient also receives Federal awards directly from a Federal awarding agency). Additionally, 45 CFR section 75 303(a) states the non Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition When subawards are made to subrecipients, the pass through entities are required to communicate the dollar amount made available under each Federal award and the Assistance Listings Number (ALN) at time of disbursement. BMC does not have system in place to provide the ALN at the time of disbursement of funds. During the year ended September 30, 2023, the BMC passed through $18,031,446 of federal funding to subrecipients. In order to assess the subrecipient’s risk of non compliance, BMC has subrecipient monitoring policies and procedures in place which include the use of a risk assessment questionnaire. The risk assessment questionnaire includes considerations consistent with 2 CFR 200.332(b), including the entity’s prior experience and results of Single Audits, in addition to other factors. As part of our testing related subrecipient monitoring, we identified the following: 1. For 4 of 16 subrecipients selected for testwork BMC did not perform a risk assessment of the entity for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring related to the subaward. However, for these subrecipients, BMC did perform monitoring procedures, including review of invoices for reimbursement, review of Research Performance Progress Reports and review of Single Audit reports. Cause The condition found was primarily due to the monitoring procedures implemented by BMC do not include a review to ensure that a risk assessment is performed for each active subrecipient and BMC does not have a mechanism in place to provide the ALN at the time of disbursement of funds to the subrecipient. Possible Asserted Effect Failure to perform an annual risk assessment to determine appropriate subrecipient monitoring procedures may result in insufficient monitoring procedures being performed to detect subrecipient noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Failure to adequately communicate award identification information could result in the subrecipient not being able to adequately track and report the subawards received resulting in errors being reported on the schedule of expenditures of federal awards within a subrecipient’s annual single audit report and not being able to comply with required terms and conditions of the federal award. Questioned Costs None. Statistical Sampling The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendation We recommend BMC implement policies, procedures, and internal controls to ensure subrecipient risk assessments are performed for each subrecipient to determine the appropriate subrecipient monitoring is performed in accordance with 45 CFR 75.352(d) and 45 CFR 75.352(e). We recommend that BMC enhance its processes and internal controls over its reporting to the subrecipients of the federal program to ensure all award identification information required under 45 CFR 75.352(a) is provided to the subrecipients.
Federal Agency: United States Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Federal Program: R&D Cluster Federal Award Numbers: Various Federal Award Years: Various Reference: 2023 003 Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332, a pass through entity (PTE) must: (a) Ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the following information at the time of the subaward and if any of these data elements change, include the changes in subsequent subaward modification. When some of this information is not available, the pass through entity must provide the best information available to describe the Federal award and subaward. Required information includes: (xii) Assistance Listings number and Title; the pass through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each Federal award and the Assistance Listings Number at time of disbursement; (2 CFE section 200.332xxi) (b) Evaluate each subrecipient’s risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring described in paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section, which may include consideration of such factors as: (1) The subrecipient’s prior experience with the same or similar subawards; (2) The results of previous audits including whether or not the subrecipient receives a Single Audit in accordance with Subpart F of this part, and the extent to which the same or similar subaward has been audited as a major program; (3) Whether the subrecipient has new personnel or new or substantially changed systems; and (4) The extent and results of Federal awarding agency monitoring (e.g., if the subrecipient also receives Federal awards directly from a Federal awarding agency). Additionally, 45 CFR section 75 303(a) states the non Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition When subawards are made to subrecipients, the pass through entities are required to communicate the dollar amount made available under each Federal award and the Assistance Listings Number (ALN) at time of disbursement. BMC does not have system in place to provide the ALN at the time of disbursement of funds. During the year ended September 30, 2023, the BMC passed through $18,031,446 of federal funding to subrecipients. In order to assess the subrecipient’s risk of non compliance, BMC has subrecipient monitoring policies and procedures in place which include the use of a risk assessment questionnaire. The risk assessment questionnaire includes considerations consistent with 2 CFR 200.332(b), including the entity’s prior experience and results of Single Audits, in addition to other factors. As part of our testing related subrecipient monitoring, we identified the following: 1. For 4 of 16 subrecipients selected for testwork BMC did not perform a risk assessment of the entity for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring related to the subaward. However, for these subrecipients, BMC did perform monitoring procedures, including review of invoices for reimbursement, review of Research Performance Progress Reports and review of Single Audit reports. Cause The condition found was primarily due to the monitoring procedures implemented by BMC do not include a review to ensure that a risk assessment is performed for each active subrecipient and BMC does not have a mechanism in place to provide the ALN at the time of disbursement of funds to the subrecipient. Possible Asserted Effect Failure to perform an annual risk assessment to determine appropriate subrecipient monitoring procedures may result in insufficient monitoring procedures being performed to detect subrecipient noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Failure to adequately communicate award identification information could result in the subrecipient not being able to adequately track and report the subawards received resulting in errors being reported on the schedule of expenditures of federal awards within a subrecipient’s annual single audit report and not being able to comply with required terms and conditions of the federal award. Questioned Costs None. Statistical Sampling The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendation We recommend BMC implement policies, procedures, and internal controls to ensure subrecipient risk assessments are performed for each subrecipient to determine the appropriate subrecipient monitoring is performed in accordance with 45 CFR 75.352(d) and 45 CFR 75.352(e). We recommend that BMC enhance its processes and internal controls over its reporting to the subrecipients of the federal program to ensure all award identification information required under 45 CFR 75.352(a) is provided to the subrecipients.
Federal Agency: United States Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Federal Program: R&D Cluster Federal Award Numbers: Various Federal Award Years: Various Reference: 2023 003 Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332, a pass through entity (PTE) must: (a) Ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the following information at the time of the subaward and if any of these data elements change, include the changes in subsequent subaward modification. When some of this information is not available, the pass through entity must provide the best information available to describe the Federal award and subaward. Required information includes: (xii) Assistance Listings number and Title; the pass through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each Federal award and the Assistance Listings Number at time of disbursement; (2 CFE section 200.332xxi) (b) Evaluate each subrecipient’s risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring described in paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section, which may include consideration of such factors as: (1) The subrecipient’s prior experience with the same or similar subawards; (2) The results of previous audits including whether or not the subrecipient receives a Single Audit in accordance with Subpart F of this part, and the extent to which the same or similar subaward has been audited as a major program; (3) Whether the subrecipient has new personnel or new or substantially changed systems; and (4) The extent and results of Federal awarding agency monitoring (e.g., if the subrecipient also receives Federal awards directly from a Federal awarding agency). Additionally, 45 CFR section 75 303(a) states the non Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition When subawards are made to subrecipients, the pass through entities are required to communicate the dollar amount made available under each Federal award and the Assistance Listings Number (ALN) at time of disbursement. BMC does not have system in place to provide the ALN at the time of disbursement of funds. During the year ended September 30, 2023, the BMC passed through $18,031,446 of federal funding to subrecipients. In order to assess the subrecipient’s risk of non compliance, BMC has subrecipient monitoring policies and procedures in place which include the use of a risk assessment questionnaire. The risk assessment questionnaire includes considerations consistent with 2 CFR 200.332(b), including the entity’s prior experience and results of Single Audits, in addition to other factors. As part of our testing related subrecipient monitoring, we identified the following: 1. For 4 of 16 subrecipients selected for testwork BMC did not perform a risk assessment of the entity for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring related to the subaward. However, for these subrecipients, BMC did perform monitoring procedures, including review of invoices for reimbursement, review of Research Performance Progress Reports and review of Single Audit reports. Cause The condition found was primarily due to the monitoring procedures implemented by BMC do not include a review to ensure that a risk assessment is performed for each active subrecipient and BMC does not have a mechanism in place to provide the ALN at the time of disbursement of funds to the subrecipient. Possible Asserted Effect Failure to perform an annual risk assessment to determine appropriate subrecipient monitoring procedures may result in insufficient monitoring procedures being performed to detect subrecipient noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Failure to adequately communicate award identification information could result in the subrecipient not being able to adequately track and report the subawards received resulting in errors being reported on the schedule of expenditures of federal awards within a subrecipient’s annual single audit report and not being able to comply with required terms and conditions of the federal award. Questioned Costs None. Statistical Sampling The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendation We recommend BMC implement policies, procedures, and internal controls to ensure subrecipient risk assessments are performed for each subrecipient to determine the appropriate subrecipient monitoring is performed in accordance with 45 CFR 75.352(d) and 45 CFR 75.352(e). We recommend that BMC enhance its processes and internal controls over its reporting to the subrecipients of the federal program to ensure all award identification information required under 45 CFR 75.352(a) is provided to the subrecipients.
Federal Agency: United States Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Federal Program: R&D Cluster Federal Award Numbers: Various Federal Award Years: Various Reference: 2023 003 Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332, a pass through entity (PTE) must: (a) Ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the following information at the time of the subaward and if any of these data elements change, include the changes in subsequent subaward modification. When some of this information is not available, the pass through entity must provide the best information available to describe the Federal award and subaward. Required information includes: (xii) Assistance Listings number and Title; the pass through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each Federal award and the Assistance Listings Number at time of disbursement; (2 CFE section 200.332xxi) (b) Evaluate each subrecipient’s risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring described in paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section, which may include consideration of such factors as: (1) The subrecipient’s prior experience with the same or similar subawards; (2) The results of previous audits including whether or not the subrecipient receives a Single Audit in accordance with Subpart F of this part, and the extent to which the same or similar subaward has been audited as a major program; (3) Whether the subrecipient has new personnel or new or substantially changed systems; and (4) The extent and results of Federal awarding agency monitoring (e.g., if the subrecipient also receives Federal awards directly from a Federal awarding agency). Additionally, 45 CFR section 75 303(a) states the non Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition When subawards are made to subrecipients, the pass through entities are required to communicate the dollar amount made available under each Federal award and the Assistance Listings Number (ALN) at time of disbursement. BMC does not have system in place to provide the ALN at the time of disbursement of funds. During the year ended September 30, 2023, the BMC passed through $18,031,446 of federal funding to subrecipients. In order to assess the subrecipient’s risk of non compliance, BMC has subrecipient monitoring policies and procedures in place which include the use of a risk assessment questionnaire. The risk assessment questionnaire includes considerations consistent with 2 CFR 200.332(b), including the entity’s prior experience and results of Single Audits, in addition to other factors. As part of our testing related subrecipient monitoring, we identified the following: 1. For 4 of 16 subrecipients selected for testwork BMC did not perform a risk assessment of the entity for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring related to the subaward. However, for these subrecipients, BMC did perform monitoring procedures, including review of invoices for reimbursement, review of Research Performance Progress Reports and review of Single Audit reports. Cause The condition found was primarily due to the monitoring procedures implemented by BMC do not include a review to ensure that a risk assessment is performed for each active subrecipient and BMC does not have a mechanism in place to provide the ALN at the time of disbursement of funds to the subrecipient. Possible Asserted Effect Failure to perform an annual risk assessment to determine appropriate subrecipient monitoring procedures may result in insufficient monitoring procedures being performed to detect subrecipient noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Failure to adequately communicate award identification information could result in the subrecipient not being able to adequately track and report the subawards received resulting in errors being reported on the schedule of expenditures of federal awards within a subrecipient’s annual single audit report and not being able to comply with required terms and conditions of the federal award. Questioned Costs None. Statistical Sampling The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendation We recommend BMC implement policies, procedures, and internal controls to ensure subrecipient risk assessments are performed for each subrecipient to determine the appropriate subrecipient monitoring is performed in accordance with 45 CFR 75.352(d) and 45 CFR 75.352(e). We recommend that BMC enhance its processes and internal controls over its reporting to the subrecipients of the federal program to ensure all award identification information required under 45 CFR 75.352(a) is provided to the subrecipients.