?See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table? CONDITION The Department of Public Instruction did not ensure all subrecipients either submitted a Single Audit report or certification form identifying a Single Audit is not required. In addition, the Department did not issue management decisions on auditing findings within 6 months or ensure that timely and appropriate corrective action was taken in all applicable instances. We selected a sample of 60 subrecipients of the total 795 in our population for testing. During our testing, 6 of the 60 subrecipients did not submit a certification form identifying whether a Single Audit was required. The Department indicated that a Single Audit report was not received but we are unable to determine whether one was required. For 4 additional subrecipients, the Department did not receive a Single Audit, issue management decisions on auditing findings within 6 months, or ensure appropriate corrective action was taken. The Department did track all of their subrecipients in a spreadsheet that captured information relating to when their certified Federal expenditure information was received as well as if a single audit is required of them. However, due to the errors noted in receiving this information as well as following up with completed single audits in a timely manner in our sample tested, it was determined that this spreadsheet was not being fully utilized. CRITERIA 2 CFR 200.331(f) states that a pass-through entity must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by 2 CFR 200 Subpart F. 2 CFR 200.331(d)(2) states that a pass-through entity must ensure subrecipients take timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity through audits, on-site reviews, and other means. 2 CFR 200.521(d) states that a pass-through entity must issue a management decision within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the Federal Audit Clearinghouse. 2 CFR 200.303(a) states that non-Federal entities must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. CAUSE The Department of Public Instruction maintains a spreadsheet to track all subrecipient audit report monitoring. However, they did not ensure that everyone on the spreadsheet provided a Single Audit report or certification of total federal expenditures. EFFECT Subrecipients spending more than $750,000 from all Federal sources may not be obtaining audits as required or implementing a corrective action plan in a timely manner if findings are noted in audits that were completed. CONTEXT The 4 subrecipients that did not provide a Single Audit report received approximately $9.9 million dollars in Federal expenditures. The additional 6 entities that did not provide certifications indicating their total Federal awards received approximately $1.5 million dollars. We did verify that the 6 entities that failed to provide certifications did not have Single Audit reports submitted to the clearing house. Where sampling was performed, the audit used a non-statistical sampling method. IDENTIFICATION AS A REPEAT FINDING Finding 2020-021 was reported in the immediate prior year. Finding 2018-041 was reported in a previous year. The prior audit finding was reported as implemented on the summary schedule of prior audit findings. This materially misrepresents the status of the finding. RECOMMENDATION We recommend the Department of Public Instruction: ? Ensure all subrecipients obtain audits in accordance with 2 CFR 200 Subpart F if they meet the requirements; ? Issue management decisions within a timely manner; ? Ensure subrecipients took timely corrective action on deficiencies identified in the audits. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION RESPONSE The Department of Public Instruction agrees with the finding. See ?Management?s Response and Corrective Action? section of this report.
?See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table? CONDITION The Department of Public Instruction did not ensure all subrecipients either submitted a Single Audit report or certification form identifying a Single Audit is not required. In addition, the Department did not issue management decisions on auditing findings within 6 months or ensure that timely and appropriate corrective action was taken in all applicable instances. We selected a sample of 60 subrecipients of the total 795 in our population for testing. During our testing, 6 of the 60 subrecipients did not submit a certification form identifying whether a Single Audit was required. The Department indicated that a Single Audit report was not received but we are unable to determine whether one was required. For 4 additional subrecipients, the Department did not receive a Single Audit, issue management decisions on auditing findings within 6 months, or ensure appropriate corrective action was taken. The Department did track all of their subrecipients in a spreadsheet that captured information relating to when their certified Federal expenditure information was received as well as if a single audit is required of them. However, due to the errors noted in receiving this information as well as following up with completed single audits in a timely manner in our sample tested, it was determined that this spreadsheet was not being fully utilized. CRITERIA 2 CFR 200.331(f) states that a pass-through entity must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by 2 CFR 200 Subpart F. 2 CFR 200.331(d)(2) states that a pass-through entity must ensure subrecipients take timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity through audits, on-site reviews, and other means. 2 CFR 200.521(d) states that a pass-through entity must issue a management decision within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the Federal Audit Clearinghouse. 2 CFR 200.303(a) states that non-Federal entities must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. CAUSE The Department of Public Instruction maintains a spreadsheet to track all subrecipient audit report monitoring. However, they did not ensure that everyone on the spreadsheet provided a Single Audit report or certification of total federal expenditures. EFFECT Subrecipients spending more than $750,000 from all Federal sources may not be obtaining audits as required or implementing a corrective action plan in a timely manner if findings are noted in audits that were completed. CONTEXT The 4 subrecipients that did not provide a Single Audit report received approximately $9.9 million dollars in Federal expenditures. The additional 6 entities that did not provide certifications indicating their total Federal awards received approximately $1.5 million dollars. We did verify that the 6 entities that failed to provide certifications did not have Single Audit reports submitted to the clearing house. Where sampling was performed, the audit used a non-statistical sampling method. IDENTIFICATION AS A REPEAT FINDING Finding 2020-021 was reported in the immediate prior year. Finding 2018-041 was reported in a previous year. The prior audit finding was reported as implemented on the summary schedule of prior audit findings. This materially misrepresents the status of the finding. RECOMMENDATION We recommend the Department of Public Instruction: ? Ensure all subrecipients obtain audits in accordance with 2 CFR 200 Subpart F if they meet the requirements; ? Issue management decisions within a timely manner; ? Ensure subrecipients took timely corrective action on deficiencies identified in the audits. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION RESPONSE The Department of Public Instruction agrees with the finding. See ?Management?s Response and Corrective Action? section of this report.
?See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table? CONDITION The Department of Public Instruction did not ensure all subrecipients either submitted a Single Audit report or certification form identifying a Single Audit is not required. In addition, the Department did not issue management decisions on auditing findings within 6 months or ensure that timely and appropriate corrective action was taken in all applicable instances. We selected a sample of 60 subrecipients of the total 795 in our population for testing. During our testing, 6 of the 60 subrecipients did not submit a certification form identifying whether a Single Audit was required. The Department indicated that a Single Audit report was not received but we are unable to determine whether one was required. For 4 additional subrecipients, the Department did not receive a Single Audit, issue management decisions on auditing findings within 6 months, or ensure appropriate corrective action was taken. The Department did track all of their subrecipients in a spreadsheet that captured information relating to when their certified Federal expenditure information was received as well as if a single audit is required of them. However, due to the errors noted in receiving this information as well as following up with completed single audits in a timely manner in our sample tested, it was determined that this spreadsheet was not being fully utilized. CRITERIA 2 CFR 200.331(f) states that a pass-through entity must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by 2 CFR 200 Subpart F. 2 CFR 200.331(d)(2) states that a pass-through entity must ensure subrecipients take timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity through audits, on-site reviews, and other means. 2 CFR 200.521(d) states that a pass-through entity must issue a management decision within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the Federal Audit Clearinghouse. 2 CFR 200.303(a) states that non-Federal entities must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. CAUSE The Department of Public Instruction maintains a spreadsheet to track all subrecipient audit report monitoring. However, they did not ensure that everyone on the spreadsheet provided a Single Audit report or certification of total federal expenditures. EFFECT Subrecipients spending more than $750,000 from all Federal sources may not be obtaining audits as required or implementing a corrective action plan in a timely manner if findings are noted in audits that were completed. CONTEXT The 4 subrecipients that did not provide a Single Audit report received approximately $9.9 million dollars in Federal expenditures. The additional 6 entities that did not provide certifications indicating their total Federal awards received approximately $1.5 million dollars. We did verify that the 6 entities that failed to provide certifications did not have Single Audit reports submitted to the clearing house. Where sampling was performed, the audit used a non-statistical sampling method. IDENTIFICATION AS A REPEAT FINDING Finding 2020-021 was reported in the immediate prior year. Finding 2018-041 was reported in a previous year. The prior audit finding was reported as implemented on the summary schedule of prior audit findings. This materially misrepresents the status of the finding. RECOMMENDATION We recommend the Department of Public Instruction: ? Ensure all subrecipients obtain audits in accordance with 2 CFR 200 Subpart F if they meet the requirements; ? Issue management decisions within a timely manner; ? Ensure subrecipients took timely corrective action on deficiencies identified in the audits. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION RESPONSE The Department of Public Instruction agrees with the finding. See ?Management?s Response and Corrective Action? section of this report.
?See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table? CONDITION The Department of Public Instruction did not ensure all subrecipients either submitted a Single Audit report or certification form identifying a Single Audit is not required. In addition, the Department did not issue management decisions on auditing findings within 6 months or ensure that timely and appropriate corrective action was taken in all applicable instances. We selected a sample of 60 subrecipients of the total 795 in our population for testing. During our testing, 6 of the 60 subrecipients did not submit a certification form identifying whether a Single Audit was required. The Department indicated that a Single Audit report was not received but we are unable to determine whether one was required. For 4 additional subrecipients, the Department did not receive a Single Audit, issue management decisions on auditing findings within 6 months, or ensure appropriate corrective action was taken. The Department did track all of their subrecipients in a spreadsheet that captured information relating to when their certified Federal expenditure information was received as well as if a single audit is required of them. However, due to the errors noted in receiving this information as well as following up with completed single audits in a timely manner in our sample tested, it was determined that this spreadsheet was not being fully utilized. CRITERIA 2 CFR 200.331(f) states that a pass-through entity must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by 2 CFR 200 Subpart F. 2 CFR 200.331(d)(2) states that a pass-through entity must ensure subrecipients take timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity through audits, on-site reviews, and other means. 2 CFR 200.521(d) states that a pass-through entity must issue a management decision within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the Federal Audit Clearinghouse. 2 CFR 200.303(a) states that non-Federal entities must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. CAUSE The Department of Public Instruction maintains a spreadsheet to track all subrecipient audit report monitoring. However, they did not ensure that everyone on the spreadsheet provided a Single Audit report or certification of total federal expenditures. EFFECT Subrecipients spending more than $750,000 from all Federal sources may not be obtaining audits as required or implementing a corrective action plan in a timely manner if findings are noted in audits that were completed. CONTEXT The 4 subrecipients that did not provide a Single Audit report received approximately $9.9 million dollars in Federal expenditures. The additional 6 entities that did not provide certifications indicating their total Federal awards received approximately $1.5 million dollars. We did verify that the 6 entities that failed to provide certifications did not have Single Audit reports submitted to the clearing house. Where sampling was performed, the audit used a non-statistical sampling method. IDENTIFICATION AS A REPEAT FINDING Finding 2020-021 was reported in the immediate prior year. Finding 2018-041 was reported in a previous year. The prior audit finding was reported as implemented on the summary schedule of prior audit findings. This materially misrepresents the status of the finding. RECOMMENDATION We recommend the Department of Public Instruction: ? Ensure all subrecipients obtain audits in accordance with 2 CFR 200 Subpart F if they meet the requirements; ? Issue management decisions within a timely manner; ? Ensure subrecipients took timely corrective action on deficiencies identified in the audits. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION RESPONSE The Department of Public Instruction agrees with the finding. See ?Management?s Response and Corrective Action? section of this report.
2022-001 Finding ? Federal Award Type: Subrecipient Monitoring ? Material Noncompliance and Material Weakness in internal control over compliance. AL Number: 21.027 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Criteria / Requirement: In accordance with 2CFR?200.331, a pass-through entity must monitor the activities of subrecipients to ensure that federal awards are used for authorized purposes in compliance with laws, regulations, and the provisions of contracts and grants agreements. Condition / Context: Latino Network passed through $85,311 in funding to subrecipients. During our audit, we noted that Latino Network did not have documented written controls or procedures to ensure compliance with the U.S. Office of Management and Budget?s Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) subrecipient monitoring requirements. Cause: Procedures are not in place to ensure that Latino Network is maintaining adequate monitoring for each federal subrecipient. Effect: Failure to maintain sufficient subrecipient monitoring may result in the wrongful use of federal funds and non-compliance with the provisions of applicable requirements. Questioned Costs: $85,311 Recommendation: The Organization should establish written policies and procedures regarding the monitoring of subrecipients, as well as establish monitoring procedures to ensure that such policies and procedures are being followed.
2022-001 Finding ? Federal Award Type: Subrecipient Monitoring ? Material Noncompliance and Material Weakness in internal control over compliance. AL Number: 21.027 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Criteria / Requirement: In accordance with 2CFR?200.331, a pass-through entity must monitor the activities of subrecipients to ensure that federal awards are used for authorized purposes in compliance with laws, regulations, and the provisions of contracts and grants agreements. Condition / Context: Latino Network passed through $85,311 in funding to subrecipients. During our audit, we noted that Latino Network did not have documented written controls or procedures to ensure compliance with the U.S. Office of Management and Budget?s Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) subrecipient monitoring requirements. Cause: Procedures are not in place to ensure that Latino Network is maintaining adequate monitoring for each federal subrecipient. Effect: Failure to maintain sufficient subrecipient monitoring may result in the wrongful use of federal funds and non-compliance with the provisions of applicable requirements. Questioned Costs: $85,311 Recommendation: The Organization should establish written policies and procedures regarding the monitoring of subrecipients, as well as establish monitoring procedures to ensure that such policies and procedures are being followed.
2022-001 Finding ? Federal Award Type: Subrecipient Monitoring ? Material Noncompliance and Material Weakness in internal control over compliance. AL Number: 21.027 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Criteria / Requirement: In accordance with 2CFR?200.331, a pass-through entity must monitor the activities of subrecipients to ensure that federal awards are used for authorized purposes in compliance with laws, regulations, and the provisions of contracts and grants agreements. Condition / Context: Latino Network passed through $85,311 in funding to subrecipients. During our audit, we noted that Latino Network did not have documented written controls or procedures to ensure compliance with the U.S. Office of Management and Budget?s Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) subrecipient monitoring requirements. Cause: Procedures are not in place to ensure that Latino Network is maintaining adequate monitoring for each federal subrecipient. Effect: Failure to maintain sufficient subrecipient monitoring may result in the wrongful use of federal funds and non-compliance with the provisions of applicable requirements. Questioned Costs: $85,311 Recommendation: The Organization should establish written policies and procedures regarding the monitoring of subrecipients, as well as establish monitoring procedures to ensure that such policies and procedures are being followed.
?See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table? CONDITION The Department of Public Instruction did not ensure all subrecipients either submitted a Single Audit report or certification form identifying a Single Audit is not required. In addition, the Department did not issue management decisions on auditing findings within 6 months or ensure that timely and appropriate corrective action was taken in all applicable instances. We selected a sample of 60 subrecipients of the total 795 in our population for testing. During our testing, 6 of the 60 subrecipients did not submit a certification form identifying whether a Single Audit was required. The Department indicated that a Single Audit report was not received but we are unable to determine whether one was required. For 4 additional subrecipients, the Department did not receive a Single Audit, issue management decisions on auditing findings within 6 months, or ensure appropriate corrective action was taken. The Department did track all of their subrecipients in a spreadsheet that captured information relating to when their certified Federal expenditure information was received as well as if a single audit is required of them. However, due to the errors noted in receiving this information as well as following up with completed single audits in a timely manner in our sample tested, it was determined that this spreadsheet was not being fully utilized. CRITERIA 2 CFR 200.331(f) states that a pass-through entity must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by 2 CFR 200 Subpart F. 2 CFR 200.331(d)(2) states that a pass-through entity must ensure subrecipients take timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity through audits, on-site reviews, and other means. 2 CFR 200.521(d) states that a pass-through entity must issue a management decision within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the Federal Audit Clearinghouse. 2 CFR 200.303(a) states that non-Federal entities must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. CAUSE The Department of Public Instruction maintains a spreadsheet to track all subrecipient audit report monitoring. However, they did not ensure that everyone on the spreadsheet provided a Single Audit report or certification of total federal expenditures. EFFECT Subrecipients spending more than $750,000 from all Federal sources may not be obtaining audits as required or implementing a corrective action plan in a timely manner if findings are noted in audits that were completed. CONTEXT The 4 subrecipients that did not provide a Single Audit report received approximately $9.9 million dollars in Federal expenditures. The additional 6 entities that did not provide certifications indicating their total Federal awards received approximately $1.5 million dollars. We did verify that the 6 entities that failed to provide certifications did not have Single Audit reports submitted to the clearing house. Where sampling was performed, the audit used a non-statistical sampling method. IDENTIFICATION AS A REPEAT FINDING Finding 2020-021 was reported in the immediate prior year. Finding 2018-041 was reported in a previous year. The prior audit finding was reported as implemented on the summary schedule of prior audit findings. This materially misrepresents the status of the finding. RECOMMENDATION We recommend the Department of Public Instruction: ? Ensure all subrecipients obtain audits in accordance with 2 CFR 200 Subpart F if they meet the requirements; ? Issue management decisions within a timely manner; ? Ensure subrecipients took timely corrective action on deficiencies identified in the audits. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION RESPONSE The Department of Public Instruction agrees with the finding. See ?Management?s Response and Corrective Action? section of this report.
Criteria or specific requirement: Per 2 CFR 200.331(a) states that all pass-through entities must ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the following information at the time of the subaward and if any of these data elements change, include the changes in subsequent subaward modification. When some of this information is not available, the pass-through entity must provide the best information available to describe the Federal award and subaward. Required information includes, federal award identification, subrecipient name, subrecipient?s DUNS number, federal award identification number (FAIN), federal award date, subaward start and end date, amount of federal funds obligated, total amount of federal award, federal award project description, name of federal awarding agency, Assistance Listing (CFDA) number and name, identification of whether the award is R&D and indirect cost rate for federal award. Per 2 CFR 200.303, requires that non-federal entities receiving federal awards establish and maintain internal control designed to reasonably ensure compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. Effective internal control should include procedures to ensure required information is communicated prior to the issuance of the subaward. Condition: During our testing, we noted forty out of the forty subrecipients (with expenditures totaling $10,453,259) had required information omitted from the sub agreements to the subrecipients including Assistance Listing (CFDA) title and number, subrecipient?s DUNS number, Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN), identification of whether the award is research and development, and indirect cost rate for federal award. Questioned costs: None. Context: Forty out of the Forty subrecipients did not include required information in sub agreements issued to subrecipients. Cause: Lack of sufficient controls in place to ensure that subaward agreements contain all required information. Effect: Failure to communicate required information could result in subrecipients not properly administering the federal programs in accordance with federal regulations. Repeat Finding: Yes, finding 2021-011. Recommendation: We recommend that the agency review its procedures for communicating information to subrecipients and implement the procedures necessary to ensure information is included in the subrecipient award documents at time of funding. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Criteria or specific requirement: Per 2 CFR 200.331(a) states that all pass-through entities must ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the following information at the time of the subaward and if any of these data elements change, include the changes in subsequent subaward modification. When some of this information is not available, the pass-through entity must provide the best information available to describe the Federal award and subaward. Required information includes, federal award identification, subrecipient name, subrecipient?s DUNS number, federal award identification number (FAIN), federal award date, subaward start and end date, amount of federal funds obligated, total amount of federal award, federal award project description, name of federal awarding agency, Assistance Listing number and name, identification of whether the award is R&D and indirect cost rate for federal award. 2 CFR part 200 section 200.303 requires that non-Federal entities receiving Federal awards (i.e., auditee management) establish and maintain internal control designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition: During our testing of sixty covered transactions (thirty-six vendors and twenty-four subrecipients), we noted that management was not able to provide supporting documentation for two vendors and three subrecipients. This includes suspension and debarment verification documentation and other supporting details including contract agreements. Questioned costs: None. Context: Management was not able to provide supporting documentation for two vendors and three subrecipients. Cause: Lack of sufficient tracking and monitoring procedures related to tracking of suspension and debarment for vendors and subrecipients. Effect: Failure to obtain the required certifications or perform verification procedures with the SAM could result in the payment of federal funds to vendors that are suspended or debarred from participation in federal assistance programs. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the agency obtain certifications from vendor stating their organization is not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from participation in federal assistance programs or document the procedures performed to verify the vendor is not identified as suspended or debarred on SAM. We recommend that the agency have proper procedures in place to ensure that all contractual documentation is maintained and able to be located. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Criteria or specific requirement: Per 2 CFR 200.331(a) states that all pass-through entities must ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the following information at the time of the subaward and if any of these data elements change, include the changes in subsequent subaward modification. When some of this information is not available, the pass-through entity must provide the best information available to describe the Federal award and subaward. Required information includes, federal award identification, subrecipient name, subrecipient?s DUNS number, federal award identification number (FAIN), federal award date, subaward start and end date, amount of federal funds obligated, total amount of federal award, federal award project description, name of federal awarding agency, Assistance Listing (CFDA) number and name, identification of whether the award is R&D and indirect cost rate for federal award. Per 2 CFR 200.303, requires that non-federal entities receiving federal awards establish and maintain internal control designed to reasonably ensure compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. Effective internal control should include procedures to ensure required information is communicated prior to the issuance of the subaward. Condition: During our testing, we noted forty out of the forty subrecipients (with expenditures totaling $10,453,259) had required information omitted from the sub agreements to the subrecipients including Assistance Listing (CFDA) title and number, subrecipient?s DUNS number, Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN), identification of whether the award is research and development, and indirect cost rate for federal award. Questioned costs: None. Context: Forty out of the Forty subrecipients did not include required information in sub agreements issued to subrecipients. Cause: Lack of sufficient controls in place to ensure that subaward agreements contain all required information. Effect: Failure to communicate required information could result in subrecipients not properly administering the federal programs in accordance with federal regulations. Repeat Finding: Yes, finding 2021-011. Recommendation: We recommend that the agency review its procedures for communicating information to subrecipients and implement the procedures necessary to ensure information is included in the subrecipient award documents at time of funding. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Criteria or specific requirement: Per 2 CFR 200.331(a) states that all pass-through entities must ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the following information at the time of the subaward and if any of these data elements change, include the changes in subsequent subaward modification. When some of this information is not available, the pass-through entity must provide the best information available to describe the Federal award and subaward. Required information includes, federal award identification, subrecipient name, subrecipient?s DUNS number, federal award identification number (FAIN), federal award date, subaward start and end date, amount of federal funds obligated, total amount of federal award, federal award project description, name of federal awarding agency, Assistance Listing number and name, identification of whether the award is R&D and indirect cost rate for federal award. 2 CFR part 200 section 200.303 requires that non-Federal entities receiving Federal awards (i.e., auditee management) establish and maintain internal control designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition: During our testing of sixty covered transactions (thirty-six vendors and twenty-four subrecipients), we noted that management was not able to provide supporting documentation for two vendors and three subrecipients. This includes suspension and debarment verification documentation and other supporting details including contract agreements. Questioned costs: None. Context: Management was not able to provide supporting documentation for two vendors and three subrecipients. Cause: Lack of sufficient tracking and monitoring procedures related to tracking of suspension and debarment for vendors and subrecipients. Effect: Failure to obtain the required certifications or perform verification procedures with the SAM could result in the payment of federal funds to vendors that are suspended or debarred from participation in federal assistance programs. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the agency obtain certifications from vendor stating their organization is not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from participation in federal assistance programs or document the procedures performed to verify the vendor is not identified as suspended or debarred on SAM. We recommend that the agency have proper procedures in place to ensure that all contractual documentation is maintained and able to be located. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Criteria or specific requirement: Per 2 CFR 200.331(a) states that all pass-through entities must ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the following information at the time of the subaward and if any of these data elements change, include the changes in subsequent subaward modification. When some of this information is not available, the pass-through entity must provide the best information available to describe the Federal award and subaward. Required information includes, federal award identification, subrecipient name, subrecipient?s DUNS number, federal award identification number (FAIN), federal award date, subaward start and end date, amount of federal funds obligated, total amount of federal award, federal award project description, name of federal awarding agency, Assistance Listing number and name, identification of whether the award is R&D and indirect cost rate for federal award. Condition: Subaward agreements to the subrecipients including Assisting Listing title and number, subrecipient?s DUNS number, Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN), identification of whether the award is research and development, and indirect cost rate for federal award, were not included. Questioned costs: None. Context: Twenty nine out of the twenty nine subrecipients did not have required information in the applicable subawards. Cause: Lack of sufficient internal controls to ensure subawards include required information. Effect: Failure to communicate required information could result in subrecipients not properly administering the federal programs in accordance with federal regulations. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend that the agency review its procedures for communicating information to subrecipients and implement the procedures necessary to ensure information is included in the subrecipient award documents at time of funding. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Criteria or specific requirement: Per 2 CFR 200.331(a) states that all pass-through entities must ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the following information at the time of the subaward and if any of these data elements change, include the changes in subsequent subaward modification. When some of this information is not available, the pass-through entity must provide the best information available to describe the Federal award and subaward. Required information includes, federal award identification, subrecipient name, subrecipient?s DUNS number, federal award identification number (FAIN), federal award date, subaward start and end date, amount of federal funds obligated, total amount of federal award, federal award project description, name of federal awarding agency, Assistance Listing number and name, identification of whether the award is R&D and indirect cost rate for federal award. Condition: Subaward agreements to the subrecipients including Assisting Listing title and number, subrecipient?s DUNS number, Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN), identification of whether the award is research and development, and indirect cost rate for federal award, were not included. Questioned costs: None. Context: Twenty nine out of the twenty nine subrecipients did not have required information in the applicable subawards. Cause: Lack of sufficient internal controls to ensure subawards include required information. Effect: Failure to communicate required information could result in subrecipients not properly administering the federal programs in accordance with federal regulations. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend that the agency review its procedures for communicating information to subrecipients and implement the procedures necessary to ensure information is included in the subrecipient award documents at time of funding. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2022-004 Department of Health and Human Services Iowa Department of Public Health CFDA #93.268 Immunization Cooperative Agreements Applicable Federal Award Number and Year ? 5881I429E, 5885BT431 #7, and 5885BT431 #8 for 2022 Subrecipient Monitoring and Special Tests and Provisions Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance and Material Noncompliance Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303(a) establishes that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides assurance that the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and conditions of the federal award. Subrecipient monitoring requirements are contained in 2 CFR 200.331 through 2 CFR 200.333 and include requirements to identify the award and applicable requirements to the subrecipient and monitor the activities of the subrecipient. Condition: The County did not formally communicate the required information to the subrecipient. No subrecipient agreement was executed. In addition, no monitoring activities were documented, including monitoring of the program?s special tests and provisions. Cause: The County did not have an internal control process in place to ensure subrecipient monitoring requirements were met. Effect: Without the proper communication of applicable requirements and monitoring of the subrecipient, there is a possibility that federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award, including the program?s special tests and provisions, were not complied with. Questioned Costs: None reported. Context: $112,801 was passed through to one subrecipient during the year ended June 30, 2022. Repeat Finding from Prior Years: No Recommendation: We recommend the County implement a control process which includes the applicable subrecipient monitoring requirements. Views of Responsible Officials: Dubuque County is working with the Dubuque Visiting Nurse Association on implementing a subrecipient agreement and will put a control process in place to monitor.
2022-004 Department of Health and Human Services Iowa Department of Public Health CFDA #93.268 Immunization Cooperative Agreements Applicable Federal Award Number and Year ? 5881I429E, 5885BT431 #7, and 5885BT431 #8 for 2022 Subrecipient Monitoring and Special Tests and Provisions Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance and Material Noncompliance Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303(a) establishes that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides assurance that the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and conditions of the federal award. Subrecipient monitoring requirements are contained in 2 CFR 200.331 through 2 CFR 200.333 and include requirements to identify the award and applicable requirements to the subrecipient and monitor the activities of the subrecipient. Condition: The County did not formally communicate the required information to the subrecipient. No subrecipient agreement was executed. In addition, no monitoring activities were documented, including monitoring of the program?s special tests and provisions. Cause: The County did not have an internal control process in place to ensure subrecipient monitoring requirements were met. Effect: Without the proper communication of applicable requirements and monitoring of the subrecipient, there is a possibility that federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award, including the program?s special tests and provisions, were not complied with. Questioned Costs: None reported. Context: $112,801 was passed through to one subrecipient during the year ended June 30, 2022. Repeat Finding from Prior Years: No Recommendation: We recommend the County implement a control process which includes the applicable subrecipient monitoring requirements. Views of Responsible Officials: Dubuque County is working with the Dubuque Visiting Nurse Association on implementing a subrecipient agreement and will put a control process in place to monitor.
2022-004 Department of Health and Human Services Iowa Department of Public Health CFDA #93.268 Immunization Cooperative Agreements Applicable Federal Award Number and Year ? 5881I429E, 5885BT431 #7, and 5885BT431 #8 for 2022 Subrecipient Monitoring and Special Tests and Provisions Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance and Material Noncompliance Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303(a) establishes that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides assurance that the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and conditions of the federal award. Subrecipient monitoring requirements are contained in 2 CFR 200.331 through 2 CFR 200.333 and include requirements to identify the award and applicable requirements to the subrecipient and monitor the activities of the subrecipient. Condition: The County did not formally communicate the required information to the subrecipient. No subrecipient agreement was executed. In addition, no monitoring activities were documented, including monitoring of the program?s special tests and provisions. Cause: The County did not have an internal control process in place to ensure subrecipient monitoring requirements were met. Effect: Without the proper communication of applicable requirements and monitoring of the subrecipient, there is a possibility that federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award, including the program?s special tests and provisions, were not complied with. Questioned Costs: None reported. Context: $112,801 was passed through to one subrecipient during the year ended June 30, 2022. Repeat Finding from Prior Years: No Recommendation: We recommend the County implement a control process which includes the applicable subrecipient monitoring requirements. Views of Responsible Officials: Dubuque County is working with the Dubuque Visiting Nurse Association on implementing a subrecipient agreement and will put a control process in place to monitor.
?See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table? CONDITION The Department of Public Instruction did not ensure all subrecipients either submitted a Single Audit report or certification form identifying a Single Audit is not required. In addition, the Department did not issue management decisions on auditing findings within 6 months or ensure that timely and appropriate corrective action was taken in all applicable instances. We selected a sample of 60 subrecipients of the total 795 in our population for testing. During our testing, 6 of the 60 subrecipients did not submit a certification form identifying whether a Single Audit was required. The Department indicated that a Single Audit report was not received but we are unable to determine whether one was required. For 4 additional subrecipients, the Department did not receive a Single Audit, issue management decisions on auditing findings within 6 months, or ensure appropriate corrective action was taken. The Department did track all of their subrecipients in a spreadsheet that captured information relating to when their certified Federal expenditure information was received as well as if a single audit is required of them. However, due to the errors noted in receiving this information as well as following up with completed single audits in a timely manner in our sample tested, it was determined that this spreadsheet was not being fully utilized. CRITERIA 2 CFR 200.331(f) states that a pass-through entity must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by 2 CFR 200 Subpart F. 2 CFR 200.331(d)(2) states that a pass-through entity must ensure subrecipients take timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity through audits, on-site reviews, and other means. 2 CFR 200.521(d) states that a pass-through entity must issue a management decision within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the Federal Audit Clearinghouse. 2 CFR 200.303(a) states that non-Federal entities must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. CAUSE The Department of Public Instruction maintains a spreadsheet to track all subrecipient audit report monitoring. However, they did not ensure that everyone on the spreadsheet provided a Single Audit report or certification of total federal expenditures. EFFECT Subrecipients spending more than $750,000 from all Federal sources may not be obtaining audits as required or implementing a corrective action plan in a timely manner if findings are noted in audits that were completed. CONTEXT The 4 subrecipients that did not provide a Single Audit report received approximately $9.9 million dollars in Federal expenditures. The additional 6 entities that did not provide certifications indicating their total Federal awards received approximately $1.5 million dollars. We did verify that the 6 entities that failed to provide certifications did not have Single Audit reports submitted to the clearing house. Where sampling was performed, the audit used a non-statistical sampling method. IDENTIFICATION AS A REPEAT FINDING Finding 2020-021 was reported in the immediate prior year. Finding 2018-041 was reported in a previous year. The prior audit finding was reported as implemented on the summary schedule of prior audit findings. This materially misrepresents the status of the finding. RECOMMENDATION We recommend the Department of Public Instruction: ? Ensure all subrecipients obtain audits in accordance with 2 CFR 200 Subpart F if they meet the requirements; ? Issue management decisions within a timely manner; ? Ensure subrecipients took timely corrective action on deficiencies identified in the audits. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION RESPONSE The Department of Public Instruction agrees with the finding. See ?Management?s Response and Corrective Action? section of this report.
?See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table? CONDITION The Department of Public Instruction did not ensure all subrecipients either submitted a Single Audit report or certification form identifying a Single Audit is not required. In addition, the Department did not issue management decisions on auditing findings within 6 months or ensure that timely and appropriate corrective action was taken in all applicable instances. We selected a sample of 60 subrecipients of the total 795 in our population for testing. During our testing, 6 of the 60 subrecipients did not submit a certification form identifying whether a Single Audit was required. The Department indicated that a Single Audit report was not received but we are unable to determine whether one was required. For 4 additional subrecipients, the Department did not receive a Single Audit, issue management decisions on auditing findings within 6 months, or ensure appropriate corrective action was taken. The Department did track all of their subrecipients in a spreadsheet that captured information relating to when their certified Federal expenditure information was received as well as if a single audit is required of them. However, due to the errors noted in receiving this information as well as following up with completed single audits in a timely manner in our sample tested, it was determined that this spreadsheet was not being fully utilized. CRITERIA 2 CFR 200.331(f) states that a pass-through entity must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by 2 CFR 200 Subpart F. 2 CFR 200.331(d)(2) states that a pass-through entity must ensure subrecipients take timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity through audits, on-site reviews, and other means. 2 CFR 200.521(d) states that a pass-through entity must issue a management decision within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the Federal Audit Clearinghouse. 2 CFR 200.303(a) states that non-Federal entities must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. CAUSE The Department of Public Instruction maintains a spreadsheet to track all subrecipient audit report monitoring. However, they did not ensure that everyone on the spreadsheet provided a Single Audit report or certification of total federal expenditures. EFFECT Subrecipients spending more than $750,000 from all Federal sources may not be obtaining audits as required or implementing a corrective action plan in a timely manner if findings are noted in audits that were completed. CONTEXT The 4 subrecipients that did not provide a Single Audit report received approximately $9.9 million dollars in Federal expenditures. The additional 6 entities that did not provide certifications indicating their total Federal awards received approximately $1.5 million dollars. We did verify that the 6 entities that failed to provide certifications did not have Single Audit reports submitted to the clearing house. Where sampling was performed, the audit used a non-statistical sampling method. IDENTIFICATION AS A REPEAT FINDING Finding 2020-021 was reported in the immediate prior year. Finding 2018-041 was reported in a previous year. The prior audit finding was reported as implemented on the summary schedule of prior audit findings. This materially misrepresents the status of the finding. RECOMMENDATION We recommend the Department of Public Instruction: ? Ensure all subrecipients obtain audits in accordance with 2 CFR 200 Subpart F if they meet the requirements; ? Issue management decisions within a timely manner; ? Ensure subrecipients took timely corrective action on deficiencies identified in the audits. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION RESPONSE The Department of Public Instruction agrees with the finding. See ?Management?s Response and Corrective Action? section of this report.
2022-002 Subrecipient Monitoring, Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls over Compliance and Instance of Noncompliance Criteria: Under Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200.331, all pass-through entities must evaluate and document each subrecipient's risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring as required by 200.331(b). Condition/Context: Per review of the subrecipient files for Coronavirus State and Local Recovery Funds assistance listing number 21.027, we noted both of the files tested out of a total population of four subrecipients did not document risk assessment. Cause: Lack of oversight of Federal Requirements related to subrecipient monitoring and documentation requirements for risk assessment contributed to this finding. Effect: The County is not in compliance with Federal requirement as outlined in 2 CFR 200 Section 200.331. Question costs: None. Repeat finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend internal controls be reviewed and updated to ensure that the County is in compliance with the Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulation requirements for all subrecipient awards. Management?s Response: Management of Josephine County has acknowledged that evidence of subrecipient monitoring and risk assessments were not retained in the file. While vetting was done on subrecipients a risk assessment form was not formally written. We have addressed it by providing training to central staff as well as department staff who have responsibility over grants. Further, a dedicated staff member will be responsible for monitoring grant compliance and completing risk assessments that were not done based on the vetting process that did occur.
2022-001 - Subrecipient Monitoring Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program: Aging Cluster Programs (CFDA 93.044, 93.045, and 93.053) Material Weakness / Material Noncompliance Condition: We noted the required monitoring procedures were not performed or appropriately documented in accordance with 2 CFR 200.331. Criteria: Section 2 CFR 200.331 of the Uniform Guidance states that pass-through entities must evaluate each subrecipient?s risk of noncompliance with Federal statues, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring. This evaluation may include, but is not limited to, (1) the subrecipient?s prior experience with the same or similar subawards; (2) the results of previous audit including whether or not the subrecipient receives a Single Audit and the extent to which the same or similar subaward has been audited as a major program; and (3) whether the subrecipient has new personnel or new or substantially changed systems. Based on the results of the evaluation, the Commission would then have to consider the extent to which monitoring procedures are required. At a minimum, the Commission must, (1) review financial and performance reports required by the Commission, (2) follow-up and ensure that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the Commission detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means, and (3) issue a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the Commission as required by 200.521 of the Uniform Guidance. Additionally, the Commission must perform monitoring procedures as stipulated in the contracts between the Commission and subrecipients. Effect: Subrecipient monitoring procedures were not properly performed and documented by the Commission. Cause: There was no documentation of subrecipient risk assessments or monitoring procedures performed for grants provided to subrecipients for fiscal year 2022. Controls were not in place to ensure compliance with monitoring requirements. Questioned Costs: None. Recommendation: We recommend the Commission implement procedures to ensure risk assessments of subrecipients prior to each subaward is performed in accordance with the Uniform Guidance requirements and thoroughly documented. We further recommend that the required subrecipient monitoring be performed and documented for each subaward. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with this finding. Refer to the corrective action plan in this report.
2022-001 - Subrecipient Monitoring Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program: Aging Cluster Programs (CFDA 93.044, 93.045, and 93.053) Material Weakness / Material Noncompliance Condition: We noted the required monitoring procedures were not performed or appropriately documented in accordance with 2 CFR 200.331. Criteria: Section 2 CFR 200.331 of the Uniform Guidance states that pass-through entities must evaluate each subrecipient?s risk of noncompliance with Federal statues, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring. This evaluation may include, but is not limited to, (1) the subrecipient?s prior experience with the same or similar subawards; (2) the results of previous audit including whether or not the subrecipient receives a Single Audit and the extent to which the same or similar subaward has been audited as a major program; and (3) whether the subrecipient has new personnel or new or substantially changed systems. Based on the results of the evaluation, the Commission would then have to consider the extent to which monitoring procedures are required. At a minimum, the Commission must, (1) review financial and performance reports required by the Commission, (2) follow-up and ensure that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the Commission detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means, and (3) issue a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the Commission as required by 200.521 of the Uniform Guidance. Additionally, the Commission must perform monitoring procedures as stipulated in the contracts between the Commission and subrecipients. Effect: Subrecipient monitoring procedures were not properly performed and documented by the Commission. Cause: There was no documentation of subrecipient risk assessments or monitoring procedures performed for grants provided to subrecipients for fiscal year 2022. Controls were not in place to ensure compliance with monitoring requirements. Questioned Costs: None. Recommendation: We recommend the Commission implement procedures to ensure risk assessments of subrecipients prior to each subaward is performed in accordance with the Uniform Guidance requirements and thoroughly documented. We further recommend that the required subrecipient monitoring be performed and documented for each subaward. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with this finding. Refer to the corrective action plan in this report.
2022-001 - Subrecipient Monitoring Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program: Aging Cluster Programs (CFDA 93.044, 93.045, and 93.053) Material Weakness / Material Noncompliance Condition: We noted the required monitoring procedures were not performed or appropriately documented in accordance with 2 CFR 200.331. Criteria: Section 2 CFR 200.331 of the Uniform Guidance states that pass-through entities must evaluate each subrecipient?s risk of noncompliance with Federal statues, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring. This evaluation may include, but is not limited to, (1) the subrecipient?s prior experience with the same or similar subawards; (2) the results of previous audit including whether or not the subrecipient receives a Single Audit and the extent to which the same or similar subaward has been audited as a major program; and (3) whether the subrecipient has new personnel or new or substantially changed systems. Based on the results of the evaluation, the Commission would then have to consider the extent to which monitoring procedures are required. At a minimum, the Commission must, (1) review financial and performance reports required by the Commission, (2) follow-up and ensure that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the Commission detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means, and (3) issue a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the Commission as required by 200.521 of the Uniform Guidance. Additionally, the Commission must perform monitoring procedures as stipulated in the contracts between the Commission and subrecipients. Effect: Subrecipient monitoring procedures were not properly performed and documented by the Commission. Cause: There was no documentation of subrecipient risk assessments or monitoring procedures performed for grants provided to subrecipients for fiscal year 2022. Controls were not in place to ensure compliance with monitoring requirements. Questioned Costs: None. Recommendation: We recommend the Commission implement procedures to ensure risk assessments of subrecipients prior to each subaward is performed in accordance with the Uniform Guidance requirements and thoroughly documented. We further recommend that the required subrecipient monitoring be performed and documented for each subaward. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with this finding. Refer to the corrective action plan in this report.
2022-001 - Subrecipient Monitoring Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program: Aging Cluster Programs (CFDA 93.044, 93.045, and 93.053) Material Weakness / Material Noncompliance Condition: We noted the required monitoring procedures were not performed or appropriately documented in accordance with 2 CFR 200.331. Criteria: Section 2 CFR 200.331 of the Uniform Guidance states that pass-through entities must evaluate each subrecipient?s risk of noncompliance with Federal statues, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring. This evaluation may include, but is not limited to, (1) the subrecipient?s prior experience with the same or similar subawards; (2) the results of previous audit including whether or not the subrecipient receives a Single Audit and the extent to which the same or similar subaward has been audited as a major program; and (3) whether the subrecipient has new personnel or new or substantially changed systems. Based on the results of the evaluation, the Commission would then have to consider the extent to which monitoring procedures are required. At a minimum, the Commission must, (1) review financial and performance reports required by the Commission, (2) follow-up and ensure that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the Commission detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means, and (3) issue a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the Commission as required by 200.521 of the Uniform Guidance. Additionally, the Commission must perform monitoring procedures as stipulated in the contracts between the Commission and subrecipients. Effect: Subrecipient monitoring procedures were not properly performed and documented by the Commission. Cause: There was no documentation of subrecipient risk assessments or monitoring procedures performed for grants provided to subrecipients for fiscal year 2022. Controls were not in place to ensure compliance with monitoring requirements. Questioned Costs: None. Recommendation: We recommend the Commission implement procedures to ensure risk assessments of subrecipients prior to each subaward is performed in accordance with the Uniform Guidance requirements and thoroughly documented. We further recommend that the required subrecipient monitoring be performed and documented for each subaward. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with this finding. Refer to the corrective action plan in this report.
2022-001 - Subrecipient Monitoring Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program: Aging Cluster Programs (CFDA 93.044, 93.045, and 93.053) Material Weakness / Material Noncompliance Condition: We noted the required monitoring procedures were not performed or appropriately documented in accordance with 2 CFR 200.331. Criteria: Section 2 CFR 200.331 of the Uniform Guidance states that pass-through entities must evaluate each subrecipient?s risk of noncompliance with Federal statues, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring. This evaluation may include, but is not limited to, (1) the subrecipient?s prior experience with the same or similar subawards; (2) the results of previous audit including whether or not the subrecipient receives a Single Audit and the extent to which the same or similar subaward has been audited as a major program; and (3) whether the subrecipient has new personnel or new or substantially changed systems. Based on the results of the evaluation, the Commission would then have to consider the extent to which monitoring procedures are required. At a minimum, the Commission must, (1) review financial and performance reports required by the Commission, (2) follow-up and ensure that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the Commission detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means, and (3) issue a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the Commission as required by 200.521 of the Uniform Guidance. Additionally, the Commission must perform monitoring procedures as stipulated in the contracts between the Commission and subrecipients. Effect: Subrecipient monitoring procedures were not properly performed and documented by the Commission. Cause: There was no documentation of subrecipient risk assessments or monitoring procedures performed for grants provided to subrecipients for fiscal year 2022. Controls were not in place to ensure compliance with monitoring requirements. Questioned Costs: None. Recommendation: We recommend the Commission implement procedures to ensure risk assessments of subrecipients prior to each subaward is performed in accordance with the Uniform Guidance requirements and thoroughly documented. We further recommend that the required subrecipient monitoring be performed and documented for each subaward. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with this finding. Refer to the corrective action plan in this report.
U.S. Department of Labor Federal Financial Assistance Listing 17.258/17.259/17.278 WIOA Cluster Subrecipient Monitoring Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Material Noncompliance Criteria ? 2 CFR 200.303(a) establishes that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides assurance that the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and conditions of the federal award. Subrecipient monitoring requirements are contained in 2 CFR 200.331 through 2 CFR 200.333 and include requirements to identify the award and applicable requirements to the subrecipient and monitor the activities of the subrecipient. Condition ? Iowa Workforce Development did not formally communicate subrecipient monitoring requirements to the County. Consequently, the County did not formally communicate the required information to the subrecipient. No subrecipient agreement was executed. In addition, no monitoring activities were documented. Cause ? The County did not have an internal control process in place to ensure subrecipient monitoring requirements were met. Effect ? Without the proper communication of applicable requirements and monitoring of the subrecipient, there is a possibility that federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award were not complied with. Questioned Costs ? None reported. Context/Sampling ? $1,120,541 was passed through to one subrecipient during the year ended June 30, 2022. Repeat Finding from Prior Years ? No. Recommendation ? We recommend the County implement a control process which includes the applicable subrecipient monitoring requirements. View of Responsible Officials ? Johnson County disagrees with the underlying premises of this finding. This finding is due in part to the fiscal agent agreement with Iowa Workforce Development (?IWD?) which does not state that subrecipient monitoring has to be done. Recently, IWD received a finding from the Department of Labor stating that the template fiscal agent agreements imposed upon fiscal agents by IWD improperly placed liability of disallowed costs onto the fiscal agents. According to DOL, IWD?s form of fiscal agent contract was incorrect, i.e., the liability was to stay with the local CEOs. In the wake of the finding, IWD is reissuing the contracts out to the regions to create compliant subrecipient entities within each, and then new fiscal agent agreements will be issued. Additionally, Johnson County will be ending it fiscal agent agreement, and no longer continue to be the fiscal agent as of June 30, 2023.
U.S. Department of Labor Federal Financial Assistance Listing 17.258/17.259/17.278 WIOA Cluster Subrecipient Monitoring Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Material Noncompliance Criteria ? 2 CFR 200.303(a) establishes that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides assurance that the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and conditions of the federal award. Subrecipient monitoring requirements are contained in 2 CFR 200.331 through 2 CFR 200.333 and include requirements to identify the award and applicable requirements to the subrecipient and monitor the activities of the subrecipient. Condition ? Iowa Workforce Development did not formally communicate subrecipient monitoring requirements to the County. Consequently, the County did not formally communicate the required information to the subrecipient. No subrecipient agreement was executed. In addition, no monitoring activities were documented. Cause ? The County did not have an internal control process in place to ensure subrecipient monitoring requirements were met. Effect ? Without the proper communication of applicable requirements and monitoring of the subrecipient, there is a possibility that federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award were not complied with. Questioned Costs ? None reported. Context/Sampling ? $1,120,541 was passed through to one subrecipient during the year ended June 30, 2022. Repeat Finding from Prior Years ? No. Recommendation ? We recommend the County implement a control process which includes the applicable subrecipient monitoring requirements. View of Responsible Officials ? Johnson County disagrees with the underlying premises of this finding. This finding is due in part to the fiscal agent agreement with Iowa Workforce Development (?IWD?) which does not state that subrecipient monitoring has to be done. Recently, IWD received a finding from the Department of Labor stating that the template fiscal agent agreements imposed upon fiscal agents by IWD improperly placed liability of disallowed costs onto the fiscal agents. According to DOL, IWD?s form of fiscal agent contract was incorrect, i.e., the liability was to stay with the local CEOs. In the wake of the finding, IWD is reissuing the contracts out to the regions to create compliant subrecipient entities within each, and then new fiscal agent agreements will be issued. Additionally, Johnson County will be ending it fiscal agent agreement, and no longer continue to be the fiscal agent as of June 30, 2023.
U.S. Department of Labor Federal Financial Assistance Listing 17.258/17.259/17.278 WIOA Cluster Subrecipient Monitoring Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Material Noncompliance Criteria ? 2 CFR 200.303(a) establishes that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides assurance that the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and conditions of the federal award. Subrecipient monitoring requirements are contained in 2 CFR 200.331 through 2 CFR 200.333 and include requirements to identify the award and applicable requirements to the subrecipient and monitor the activities of the subrecipient. Condition ? Iowa Workforce Development did not formally communicate subrecipient monitoring requirements to the County. Consequently, the County did not formally communicate the required information to the subrecipient. No subrecipient agreement was executed. In addition, no monitoring activities were documented. Cause ? The County did not have an internal control process in place to ensure subrecipient monitoring requirements were met. Effect ? Without the proper communication of applicable requirements and monitoring of the subrecipient, there is a possibility that federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award were not complied with. Questioned Costs ? None reported. Context/Sampling ? $1,120,541 was passed through to one subrecipient during the year ended June 30, 2022. Repeat Finding from Prior Years ? No. Recommendation ? We recommend the County implement a control process which includes the applicable subrecipient monitoring requirements. View of Responsible Officials ? Johnson County disagrees with the underlying premises of this finding. This finding is due in part to the fiscal agent agreement with Iowa Workforce Development (?IWD?) which does not state that subrecipient monitoring has to be done. Recently, IWD received a finding from the Department of Labor stating that the template fiscal agent agreements imposed upon fiscal agents by IWD improperly placed liability of disallowed costs onto the fiscal agents. According to DOL, IWD?s form of fiscal agent contract was incorrect, i.e., the liability was to stay with the local CEOs. In the wake of the finding, IWD is reissuing the contracts out to the regions to create compliant subrecipient entities within each, and then new fiscal agent agreements will be issued. Additionally, Johnson County will be ending it fiscal agent agreement, and no longer continue to be the fiscal agent as of June 30, 2023.
U.S. Department of Labor Federal Financial Assistance Listing 17.258/17.259/17.278 WIOA Cluster Subrecipient Monitoring Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Material Noncompliance Criteria ? 2 CFR 200.303(a) establishes that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides assurance that the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and conditions of the federal award. Subrecipient monitoring requirements are contained in 2 CFR 200.331 through 2 CFR 200.333 and include requirements to identify the award and applicable requirements to the subrecipient and monitor the activities of the subrecipient. Condition ? Iowa Workforce Development did not formally communicate subrecipient monitoring requirements to the County. Consequently, the County did not formally communicate the required information to the subrecipient. No subrecipient agreement was executed. In addition, no monitoring activities were documented. Cause ? The County did not have an internal control process in place to ensure subrecipient monitoring requirements were met. Effect ? Without the proper communication of applicable requirements and monitoring of the subrecipient, there is a possibility that federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award were not complied with. Questioned Costs ? None reported. Context/Sampling ? $1,120,541 was passed through to one subrecipient during the year ended June 30, 2022. Repeat Finding from Prior Years ? No. Recommendation ? We recommend the County implement a control process which includes the applicable subrecipient monitoring requirements. View of Responsible Officials ? Johnson County disagrees with the underlying premises of this finding. This finding is due in part to the fiscal agent agreement with Iowa Workforce Development (?IWD?) which does not state that subrecipient monitoring has to be done. Recently, IWD received a finding from the Department of Labor stating that the template fiscal agent agreements imposed upon fiscal agents by IWD improperly placed liability of disallowed costs onto the fiscal agents. According to DOL, IWD?s form of fiscal agent contract was incorrect, i.e., the liability was to stay with the local CEOs. In the wake of the finding, IWD is reissuing the contracts out to the regions to create compliant subrecipient entities within each, and then new fiscal agent agreements will be issued. Additionally, Johnson County will be ending it fiscal agent agreement, and no longer continue to be the fiscal agent as of June 30, 2023.
Finding number: 2022 005 Federal agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Pass through agency: Massachusetts Executive Office of Elderly Affairs Program: Aging Cluster ALN #: 93.044, 93.045, 93.053 Award number: Various Award year: Various Finding: Internal Control over Subrecipient Monitoring Prior Year Finding: No Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency Criteria 2 CFR section 200.331(a) indicates that all pass through entities must ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the following information at the time of the subaward and if any of these data elements change, include the changes in subsequent subaward modification: (1) Federal Award Identification. ? Subrecipient?s name (which must match registered name in DUNS); ? Subrecipient?s DUNS number (see ? 200.32 Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) number); ? Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN); ? Federal award date; ? Subaward Period of Performance Start and End Date; ? Amount of Federal Funds Obligated by this action; ? Total Amount of Federal Funds Obligated to the subrecipient; ? Total Amount of the Federal Award committed to the subrecipient by the pass through entity; ? Federal award project description, as required to be responsive to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA); ? Name of Federal awarding agency, pass through entity, and contact information for awarding official of the pass through entity; ? ALN Number and Name; the pass through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each Federal award and the ALN number at time of disbursement; ? Identification of whether the award is R&D; and ? Indirect cost rate for the Federal award (including if the de minimis rate is charged per ? 200.414 Indirect (F&A) costs). (2) All requirements imposed by the pass through entity on the subrecipient so that the Federal award is used in accordance with Federal statutes, regulations and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. (3) Any additional requirements that the pass through entity imposes on the subrecipient in order for the pass through entity to meet its own responsibility to the Federal awarding agency including identification of any required financial and performance reports; (4) An approved Federally recognized indirect cost rate negotiated between the subrecipient and the Federal government or, if no such rate exists, either a rate negotiated between the pass through entity and the subrecipient (in compliance with this part), or a de minimis indirect cost rate as defined in ? 200.414 Indirect (F&A) costs, paragraph (b) of this part. (5) A requirement that the subrecipient permit the pass through entity and auditors to have access to the subrecipient?s records and financial statements as necessary for the passthrough entity to meet the requirements of this section, ? 200.300 Statutory and national policy requirements through 200.309 Period of performance, and Subpart F ? Audit Requirements of this part; and (6) Appropriate terms and conditions concerning closeout of the subaward. Condition During our testing of subrecipient monitoring for a sample of 8 out of the population of 20 subrecipients, the City of Boston?s Age Strong Commission (Age Strong Commission) subaward letters were authorized however it was noted that such documents did not contain all of the required elements of 2 CFR Section 200.331(a) listed above. For all 8 subrecipients, the subaward letter did not identify whether the subaward is R&D and did not contain the indirect cost rate for the Federal award. Cause This appears to be due to inadequate review to ensure the subaward includes all of the required elements of 2CFR Section 200.331(a) prior to authorization. Effect Aging does not have adequate controls over subrecipient notification requirements. Whether Sampling was Statistically Valid The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation We recommend that OEM execute an updated MOA with its subrecipients that expressly includes all information description in 2 CFR section 200.331(a)(1) as required by the Uniform Guidance. View of Responsible Officials from the Auditee The City of Boston?s Age Strong Commission has revised the addendum that is attached to their award letters to include whether or not the award is R&D and a section on indirect cost rate.
Finding number: 2022 006 Federal agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Pass through agency: Massachusetts Executive Office of Elderly Affairs Program: Aging Cluster ALN #: 93.044, 93.045, 93.053 Award number: Various Award year: Various Finding: Internal Control over Subrecipient Monitoring Prior Year Finding: No Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency Criteria According to 2 CFR 200.331 (b), a pass through entity must evaluate each subrecipient?s risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring, which may include consideration of such factors as: ? The subrecipient?s prior experience with the same or similar subawards; ? The results of previous audits including whether or not the subrecipient receives a Single Audit in accordance with Subpart F Audit Requirements of this part, and the extent to which the same or similar subaward has been audited as a major program; ? Whether the subrecipient has new personnel or new or substantially changed systems; and ? The extent and results of Federal awarding agency monitoring (e.g., if the subrecipient also receives Federal awards directly from a Federal awarding agency). Also, according to 2 CFR 200.331 (d), a pass through entity must: ? Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved. ? Follow up and ensure that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass through entity detected through audits, on site reviews, and other means. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 indicates that non Federal entities receiving Federal awards must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition During our testing of subrecipient monitoring for a sample of 8 out of the population of 20 subrecipients, the City of Boston?s Age Strong Commission (Age Strong Commission) was unable to provide documentation for one of the 8 subrecipients showing that a formal risk evaluation had been performed. In addition, the Age Strong Commission?s internal controls did not include formal risk evaluation procedures. Cause This appears to be due to inadequate policies and procedures surrounding the initial risk assessment of the subrecipients. Effect The Age Strong Commission does not have adequate controls over evaluating each subrecipient?s risk of noncompliance for purposes of determining appropriate subrecipient monitoring. Whether Sampling was Statistically Valid The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Questioned Costs None Recommendation We recommend that the Age Strong Commission implement control procedures to ensure that each subrecipient is evaluated for risk of noncompliance to ensure appropriate subrecipient monitoring. View of Responsible Officials from the Auditee A risk assessment questionnaire will be completed prior to funding being awarded to a sub recipient. The City of Boston?s Age Strong Commission?s policies and procedures will be updated to reflect this.
Finding number: 2022 005 Federal agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Pass through agency: Massachusetts Executive Office of Elderly Affairs Program: Aging Cluster ALN #: 93.044, 93.045, 93.053 Award number: Various Award year: Various Finding: Internal Control over Subrecipient Monitoring Prior Year Finding: No Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency Criteria 2 CFR section 200.331(a) indicates that all pass through entities must ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the following information at the time of the subaward and if any of these data elements change, include the changes in subsequent subaward modification: (1) Federal Award Identification. ? Subrecipient?s name (which must match registered name in DUNS); ? Subrecipient?s DUNS number (see ? 200.32 Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) number); ? Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN); ? Federal award date; ? Subaward Period of Performance Start and End Date; ? Amount of Federal Funds Obligated by this action; ? Total Amount of Federal Funds Obligated to the subrecipient; ? Total Amount of the Federal Award committed to the subrecipient by the pass through entity; ? Federal award project description, as required to be responsive to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA); ? Name of Federal awarding agency, pass through entity, and contact information for awarding official of the pass through entity; ? ALN Number and Name; the pass through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each Federal award and the ALN number at time of disbursement; ? Identification of whether the award is R&D; and ? Indirect cost rate for the Federal award (including if the de minimis rate is charged per ? 200.414 Indirect (F&A) costs). (2) All requirements imposed by the pass through entity on the subrecipient so that the Federal award is used in accordance with Federal statutes, regulations and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. (3) Any additional requirements that the pass through entity imposes on the subrecipient in order for the pass through entity to meet its own responsibility to the Federal awarding agency including identification of any required financial and performance reports; (4) An approved Federally recognized indirect cost rate negotiated between the subrecipient and the Federal government or, if no such rate exists, either a rate negotiated between the pass through entity and the subrecipient (in compliance with this part), or a de minimis indirect cost rate as defined in ? 200.414 Indirect (F&A) costs, paragraph (b) of this part. (5) A requirement that the subrecipient permit the pass through entity and auditors to have access to the subrecipient?s records and financial statements as necessary for the passthrough entity to meet the requirements of this section, ? 200.300 Statutory and national policy requirements through 200.309 Period of performance, and Subpart F ? Audit Requirements of this part; and (6) Appropriate terms and conditions concerning closeout of the subaward. Condition During our testing of subrecipient monitoring for a sample of 8 out of the population of 20 subrecipients, the City of Boston?s Age Strong Commission (Age Strong Commission) subaward letters were authorized however it was noted that such documents did not contain all of the required elements of 2 CFR Section 200.331(a) listed above. For all 8 subrecipients, the subaward letter did not identify whether the subaward is R&D and did not contain the indirect cost rate for the Federal award. Cause This appears to be due to inadequate review to ensure the subaward includes all of the required elements of 2CFR Section 200.331(a) prior to authorization. Effect Aging does not have adequate controls over subrecipient notification requirements. Whether Sampling was Statistically Valid The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation We recommend that OEM execute an updated MOA with its subrecipients that expressly includes all information description in 2 CFR section 200.331(a)(1) as required by the Uniform Guidance. View of Responsible Officials from the Auditee The City of Boston?s Age Strong Commission has revised the addendum that is attached to their award letters to include whether or not the award is R&D and a section on indirect cost rate.
Finding number: 2022 006 Federal agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Pass through agency: Massachusetts Executive Office of Elderly Affairs Program: Aging Cluster ALN #: 93.044, 93.045, 93.053 Award number: Various Award year: Various Finding: Internal Control over Subrecipient Monitoring Prior Year Finding: No Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency Criteria According to 2 CFR 200.331 (b), a pass through entity must evaluate each subrecipient?s risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring, which may include consideration of such factors as: ? The subrecipient?s prior experience with the same or similar subawards; ? The results of previous audits including whether or not the subrecipient receives a Single Audit in accordance with Subpart F Audit Requirements of this part, and the extent to which the same or similar subaward has been audited as a major program; ? Whether the subrecipient has new personnel or new or substantially changed systems; and ? The extent and results of Federal awarding agency monitoring (e.g., if the subrecipient also receives Federal awards directly from a Federal awarding agency). Also, according to 2 CFR 200.331 (d), a pass through entity must: ? Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved. ? Follow up and ensure that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass through entity detected through audits, on site reviews, and other means. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 indicates that non Federal entities receiving Federal awards must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition During our testing of subrecipient monitoring for a sample of 8 out of the population of 20 subrecipients, the City of Boston?s Age Strong Commission (Age Strong Commission) was unable to provide documentation for one of the 8 subrecipients showing that a formal risk evaluation had been performed. In addition, the Age Strong Commission?s internal controls did not include formal risk evaluation procedures. Cause This appears to be due to inadequate policies and procedures surrounding the initial risk assessment of the subrecipients. Effect The Age Strong Commission does not have adequate controls over evaluating each subrecipient?s risk of noncompliance for purposes of determining appropriate subrecipient monitoring. Whether Sampling was Statistically Valid The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Questioned Costs None Recommendation We recommend that the Age Strong Commission implement control procedures to ensure that each subrecipient is evaluated for risk of noncompliance to ensure appropriate subrecipient monitoring. View of Responsible Officials from the Auditee A risk assessment questionnaire will be completed prior to funding being awarded to a sub recipient. The City of Boston?s Age Strong Commission?s policies and procedures will be updated to reflect this.
Finding number: 2022 005 Federal agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Pass through agency: Massachusetts Executive Office of Elderly Affairs Program: Aging Cluster ALN #: 93.044, 93.045, 93.053 Award number: Various Award year: Various Finding: Internal Control over Subrecipient Monitoring Prior Year Finding: No Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency Criteria 2 CFR section 200.331(a) indicates that all pass through entities must ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the following information at the time of the subaward and if any of these data elements change, include the changes in subsequent subaward modification: (1) Federal Award Identification. ? Subrecipient?s name (which must match registered name in DUNS); ? Subrecipient?s DUNS number (see ? 200.32 Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) number); ? Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN); ? Federal award date; ? Subaward Period of Performance Start and End Date; ? Amount of Federal Funds Obligated by this action; ? Total Amount of Federal Funds Obligated to the subrecipient; ? Total Amount of the Federal Award committed to the subrecipient by the pass through entity; ? Federal award project description, as required to be responsive to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA); ? Name of Federal awarding agency, pass through entity, and contact information for awarding official of the pass through entity; ? ALN Number and Name; the pass through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each Federal award and the ALN number at time of disbursement; ? Identification of whether the award is R&D; and ? Indirect cost rate for the Federal award (including if the de minimis rate is charged per ? 200.414 Indirect (F&A) costs). (2) All requirements imposed by the pass through entity on the subrecipient so that the Federal award is used in accordance with Federal statutes, regulations and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. (3) Any additional requirements that the pass through entity imposes on the subrecipient in order for the pass through entity to meet its own responsibility to the Federal awarding agency including identification of any required financial and performance reports; (4) An approved Federally recognized indirect cost rate negotiated between the subrecipient and the Federal government or, if no such rate exists, either a rate negotiated between the pass through entity and the subrecipient (in compliance with this part), or a de minimis indirect cost rate as defined in ? 200.414 Indirect (F&A) costs, paragraph (b) of this part. (5) A requirement that the subrecipient permit the pass through entity and auditors to have access to the subrecipient?s records and financial statements as necessary for the passthrough entity to meet the requirements of this section, ? 200.300 Statutory and national policy requirements through 200.309 Period of performance, and Subpart F ? Audit Requirements of this part; and (6) Appropriate terms and conditions concerning closeout of the subaward. Condition During our testing of subrecipient monitoring for a sample of 8 out of the population of 20 subrecipients, the City of Boston?s Age Strong Commission (Age Strong Commission) subaward letters were authorized however it was noted that such documents did not contain all of the required elements of 2 CFR Section 200.331(a) listed above. For all 8 subrecipients, the subaward letter did not identify whether the subaward is R&D and did not contain the indirect cost rate for the Federal award. Cause This appears to be due to inadequate review to ensure the subaward includes all of the required elements of 2CFR Section 200.331(a) prior to authorization. Effect Aging does not have adequate controls over subrecipient notification requirements. Whether Sampling was Statistically Valid The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation We recommend that OEM execute an updated MOA with its subrecipients that expressly includes all information description in 2 CFR section 200.331(a)(1) as required by the Uniform Guidance. View of Responsible Officials from the Auditee The City of Boston?s Age Strong Commission has revised the addendum that is attached to their award letters to include whether or not the award is R&D and a section on indirect cost rate.
Finding number: 2022 006 Federal agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Pass through agency: Massachusetts Executive Office of Elderly Affairs Program: Aging Cluster ALN #: 93.044, 93.045, 93.053 Award number: Various Award year: Various Finding: Internal Control over Subrecipient Monitoring Prior Year Finding: No Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency Criteria According to 2 CFR 200.331 (b), a pass through entity must evaluate each subrecipient?s risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring, which may include consideration of such factors as: ? The subrecipient?s prior experience with the same or similar subawards; ? The results of previous audits including whether or not the subrecipient receives a Single Audit in accordance with Subpart F Audit Requirements of this part, and the extent to which the same or similar subaward has been audited as a major program; ? Whether the subrecipient has new personnel or new or substantially changed systems; and ? The extent and results of Federal awarding agency monitoring (e.g., if the subrecipient also receives Federal awards directly from a Federal awarding agency). Also, according to 2 CFR 200.331 (d), a pass through entity must: ? Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved. ? Follow up and ensure that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass through entity detected through audits, on site reviews, and other means. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 indicates that non Federal entities receiving Federal awards must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition During our testing of subrecipient monitoring for a sample of 8 out of the population of 20 subrecipients, the City of Boston?s Age Strong Commission (Age Strong Commission) was unable to provide documentation for one of the 8 subrecipients showing that a formal risk evaluation had been performed. In addition, the Age Strong Commission?s internal controls did not include formal risk evaluation procedures. Cause This appears to be due to inadequate policies and procedures surrounding the initial risk assessment of the subrecipients. Effect The Age Strong Commission does not have adequate controls over evaluating each subrecipient?s risk of noncompliance for purposes of determining appropriate subrecipient monitoring. Whether Sampling was Statistically Valid The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Questioned Costs None Recommendation We recommend that the Age Strong Commission implement control procedures to ensure that each subrecipient is evaluated for risk of noncompliance to ensure appropriate subrecipient monitoring. View of Responsible Officials from the Auditee A risk assessment questionnaire will be completed prior to funding being awarded to a sub recipient. The City of Boston?s Age Strong Commission?s policies and procedures will be updated to reflect this.
Finding number: 2022 005 Federal agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Pass through agency: Massachusetts Executive Office of Elderly Affairs Program: Aging Cluster ALN #: 93.044, 93.045, 93.053 Award number: Various Award year: Various Finding: Internal Control over Subrecipient Monitoring Prior Year Finding: No Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency Criteria 2 CFR section 200.331(a) indicates that all pass through entities must ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the following information at the time of the subaward and if any of these data elements change, include the changes in subsequent subaward modification: (1) Federal Award Identification. ? Subrecipient?s name (which must match registered name in DUNS); ? Subrecipient?s DUNS number (see ? 200.32 Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) number); ? Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN); ? Federal award date; ? Subaward Period of Performance Start and End Date; ? Amount of Federal Funds Obligated by this action; ? Total Amount of Federal Funds Obligated to the subrecipient; ? Total Amount of the Federal Award committed to the subrecipient by the pass through entity; ? Federal award project description, as required to be responsive to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA); ? Name of Federal awarding agency, pass through entity, and contact information for awarding official of the pass through entity; ? ALN Number and Name; the pass through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each Federal award and the ALN number at time of disbursement; ? Identification of whether the award is R&D; and ? Indirect cost rate for the Federal award (including if the de minimis rate is charged per ? 200.414 Indirect (F&A) costs). (2) All requirements imposed by the pass through entity on the subrecipient so that the Federal award is used in accordance with Federal statutes, regulations and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. (3) Any additional requirements that the pass through entity imposes on the subrecipient in order for the pass through entity to meet its own responsibility to the Federal awarding agency including identification of any required financial and performance reports; (4) An approved Federally recognized indirect cost rate negotiated between the subrecipient and the Federal government or, if no such rate exists, either a rate negotiated between the pass through entity and the subrecipient (in compliance with this part), or a de minimis indirect cost rate as defined in ? 200.414 Indirect (F&A) costs, paragraph (b) of this part. (5) A requirement that the subrecipient permit the pass through entity and auditors to have access to the subrecipient?s records and financial statements as necessary for the passthrough entity to meet the requirements of this section, ? 200.300 Statutory and national policy requirements through 200.309 Period of performance, and Subpart F ? Audit Requirements of this part; and (6) Appropriate terms and conditions concerning closeout of the subaward. Condition During our testing of subrecipient monitoring for a sample of 8 out of the population of 20 subrecipients, the City of Boston?s Age Strong Commission (Age Strong Commission) subaward letters were authorized however it was noted that such documents did not contain all of the required elements of 2 CFR Section 200.331(a) listed above. For all 8 subrecipients, the subaward letter did not identify whether the subaward is R&D and did not contain the indirect cost rate for the Federal award. Cause This appears to be due to inadequate review to ensure the subaward includes all of the required elements of 2CFR Section 200.331(a) prior to authorization. Effect Aging does not have adequate controls over subrecipient notification requirements. Whether Sampling was Statistically Valid The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation We recommend that OEM execute an updated MOA with its subrecipients that expressly includes all information description in 2 CFR section 200.331(a)(1) as required by the Uniform Guidance. View of Responsible Officials from the Auditee The City of Boston?s Age Strong Commission has revised the addendum that is attached to their award letters to include whether or not the award is R&D and a section on indirect cost rate.
Finding number: 2022 006 Federal agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Pass through agency: Massachusetts Executive Office of Elderly Affairs Program: Aging Cluster ALN #: 93.044, 93.045, 93.053 Award number: Various Award year: Various Finding: Internal Control over Subrecipient Monitoring Prior Year Finding: No Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency Criteria According to 2 CFR 200.331 (b), a pass through entity must evaluate each subrecipient?s risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring, which may include consideration of such factors as: ? The subrecipient?s prior experience with the same or similar subawards; ? The results of previous audits including whether or not the subrecipient receives a Single Audit in accordance with Subpart F Audit Requirements of this part, and the extent to which the same or similar subaward has been audited as a major program; ? Whether the subrecipient has new personnel or new or substantially changed systems; and ? The extent and results of Federal awarding agency monitoring (e.g., if the subrecipient also receives Federal awards directly from a Federal awarding agency). Also, according to 2 CFR 200.331 (d), a pass through entity must: ? Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved. ? Follow up and ensure that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass through entity detected through audits, on site reviews, and other means. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 indicates that non Federal entities receiving Federal awards must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition During our testing of subrecipient monitoring for a sample of 8 out of the population of 20 subrecipients, the City of Boston?s Age Strong Commission (Age Strong Commission) was unable to provide documentation for one of the 8 subrecipients showing that a formal risk evaluation had been performed. In addition, the Age Strong Commission?s internal controls did not include formal risk evaluation procedures. Cause This appears to be due to inadequate policies and procedures surrounding the initial risk assessment of the subrecipients. Effect The Age Strong Commission does not have adequate controls over evaluating each subrecipient?s risk of noncompliance for purposes of determining appropriate subrecipient monitoring. Whether Sampling was Statistically Valid The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Questioned Costs None Recommendation We recommend that the Age Strong Commission implement control procedures to ensure that each subrecipient is evaluated for risk of noncompliance to ensure appropriate subrecipient monitoring. View of Responsible Officials from the Auditee A risk assessment questionnaire will be completed prior to funding being awarded to a sub recipient. The City of Boston?s Age Strong Commission?s policies and procedures will be updated to reflect this.
Finding number: 2022 005 Federal agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Pass through agency: Massachusetts Executive Office of Elderly Affairs Program: Aging Cluster ALN #: 93.044, 93.045, 93.053 Award number: Various Award year: Various Finding: Internal Control over Subrecipient Monitoring Prior Year Finding: No Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency Criteria 2 CFR section 200.331(a) indicates that all pass through entities must ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the following information at the time of the subaward and if any of these data elements change, include the changes in subsequent subaward modification: (1) Federal Award Identification. ? Subrecipient?s name (which must match registered name in DUNS); ? Subrecipient?s DUNS number (see ? 200.32 Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) number); ? Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN); ? Federal award date; ? Subaward Period of Performance Start and End Date; ? Amount of Federal Funds Obligated by this action; ? Total Amount of Federal Funds Obligated to the subrecipient; ? Total Amount of the Federal Award committed to the subrecipient by the pass through entity; ? Federal award project description, as required to be responsive to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA); ? Name of Federal awarding agency, pass through entity, and contact information for awarding official of the pass through entity; ? ALN Number and Name; the pass through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each Federal award and the ALN number at time of disbursement; ? Identification of whether the award is R&D; and ? Indirect cost rate for the Federal award (including if the de minimis rate is charged per ? 200.414 Indirect (F&A) costs). (2) All requirements imposed by the pass through entity on the subrecipient so that the Federal award is used in accordance with Federal statutes, regulations and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. (3) Any additional requirements that the pass through entity imposes on the subrecipient in order for the pass through entity to meet its own responsibility to the Federal awarding agency including identification of any required financial and performance reports; (4) An approved Federally recognized indirect cost rate negotiated between the subrecipient and the Federal government or, if no such rate exists, either a rate negotiated between the pass through entity and the subrecipient (in compliance with this part), or a de minimis indirect cost rate as defined in ? 200.414 Indirect (F&A) costs, paragraph (b) of this part. (5) A requirement that the subrecipient permit the pass through entity and auditors to have access to the subrecipient?s records and financial statements as necessary for the passthrough entity to meet the requirements of this section, ? 200.300 Statutory and national policy requirements through 200.309 Period of performance, and Subpart F ? Audit Requirements of this part; and (6) Appropriate terms and conditions concerning closeout of the subaward. Condition During our testing of subrecipient monitoring for a sample of 8 out of the population of 20 subrecipients, the City of Boston?s Age Strong Commission (Age Strong Commission) subaward letters were authorized however it was noted that such documents did not contain all of the required elements of 2 CFR Section 200.331(a) listed above. For all 8 subrecipients, the subaward letter did not identify whether the subaward is R&D and did not contain the indirect cost rate for the Federal award. Cause This appears to be due to inadequate review to ensure the subaward includes all of the required elements of 2CFR Section 200.331(a) prior to authorization. Effect Aging does not have adequate controls over subrecipient notification requirements. Whether Sampling was Statistically Valid The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation We recommend that OEM execute an updated MOA with its subrecipients that expressly includes all information description in 2 CFR section 200.331(a)(1) as required by the Uniform Guidance. View of Responsible Officials from the Auditee The City of Boston?s Age Strong Commission has revised the addendum that is attached to their award letters to include whether or not the award is R&D and a section on indirect cost rate.
Finding number: 2022 006 Federal agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Pass through agency: Massachusetts Executive Office of Elderly Affairs Program: Aging Cluster ALN #: 93.044, 93.045, 93.053 Award number: Various Award year: Various Finding: Internal Control over Subrecipient Monitoring Prior Year Finding: No Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency Criteria According to 2 CFR 200.331 (b), a pass through entity must evaluate each subrecipient?s risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring, which may include consideration of such factors as: ? The subrecipient?s prior experience with the same or similar subawards; ? The results of previous audits including whether or not the subrecipient receives a Single Audit in accordance with Subpart F Audit Requirements of this part, and the extent to which the same or similar subaward has been audited as a major program; ? Whether the subrecipient has new personnel or new or substantially changed systems; and ? The extent and results of Federal awarding agency monitoring (e.g., if the subrecipient also receives Federal awards directly from a Federal awarding agency). Also, according to 2 CFR 200.331 (d), a pass through entity must: ? Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved. ? Follow up and ensure that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass through entity detected through audits, on site reviews, and other means. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 indicates that non Federal entities receiving Federal awards must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition During our testing of subrecipient monitoring for a sample of 8 out of the population of 20 subrecipients, the City of Boston?s Age Strong Commission (Age Strong Commission) was unable to provide documentation for one of the 8 subrecipients showing that a formal risk evaluation had been performed. In addition, the Age Strong Commission?s internal controls did not include formal risk evaluation procedures. Cause This appears to be due to inadequate policies and procedures surrounding the initial risk assessment of the subrecipients. Effect The Age Strong Commission does not have adequate controls over evaluating each subrecipient?s risk of noncompliance for purposes of determining appropriate subrecipient monitoring. Whether Sampling was Statistically Valid The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Questioned Costs None Recommendation We recommend that the Age Strong Commission implement control procedures to ensure that each subrecipient is evaluated for risk of noncompliance to ensure appropriate subrecipient monitoring. View of Responsible Officials from the Auditee A risk assessment questionnaire will be completed prior to funding being awarded to a sub recipient. The City of Boston?s Age Strong Commission?s policies and procedures will be updated to reflect this.
Finding number: 2022 007 Federal agency: U.S. Department of Homeland Security Pass through agency: Massachusetts Executive Office of Public Safety & Security Program: Homeland Security Grant Program ALN #: 97.067 Award number: Boston FFY 19 UASI, Boston FFY 20 UASI, Boston FFY 21 UASI, Boston FFY 22 UASI, Award year: Various Finding: Internal Control over Subrecipient Monitoring Prior Year Finding: No Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency Criteria According to 2 CFR 200.331 (b), a pass through entity must evaluate each subrecipient?s risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring, which may include consideration of such factors as: ? The subrecipient?s prior experience with the same or similar subawards; ? The results of previous audits including whether or not the subrecipient receives a Single Audit in accordance with Subpart F Audit Requirements of this part, and the extent to which the same or similar subaward has been audited as a major program; ? Whether the subrecipient has new personnel or new or substantially changed systems; and ? The extent and results of Federal awarding agency monitoring (e.g., if the subrecipient also receives Federal awards directly from a Federal awarding agency). Also, according to 2 CFR 200.331 (d), a pass through entity must: ? Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved. ? Follow up and ensure that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass through entity detected through audits, on site reviews, and other means. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 indicates that non Federal entities receiving Federal awards must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition Based on our testwork, it was noted that the Mayor?s Office of Office of Emergency Management (OEM) did not perform a formal evaluation of each subrecipient?s risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring to be performed. Further, our review of program monitoring documentation for our sample of 4 of the population of 11 subrecipients indicated that, although OEM performed subrecipient monitoring in fiscal year 2022, OEM did not follow up with 2 out of 4 subrecipients as to why the amount of total program expenditures on the subrecipients? fiscal year 2021 Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) were different than total program expenditures reported to them by OEM. Cause This appears to be due to inadequate policies and procedures surrounding both the initial risk assessment of the subrecipients, as well as follow up with subrecipients when differences are noted between funding amounts reported to the subrecipient by OEM and amounts reported of the subrecipient?s SEFA. Effect OEM does not have adequate controls over evaluating each subrecipient?s risk of noncompliance for purposes of determining appropriate subrecipient monitoring, and ensuring that the total amount of expenditures reported on the subrecipient?s SEFA is consistent with grant funding provided by OEM to the subrecipient. Whether Sampling was Statistically Valid The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation We recommend that OEM implement control procedures to ensure that each subrecipient is evaluated for risk of noncompliance for determining appropriate subrecipient monitoring, and to ensure that the total amount of expenditures reported on the subrecipient?s SEFA is consistent with grant funding provided by OEM to the subrecipient. View of Responsible Officials from the Auditee OEM will add an event to the departmental annual calendar on the first business day of the month of May of every year indicating that pre risk assessment forms for the upcoming fiscal year beginning on July 1st are to be sent out to subrecipients of federal funds. The addition of this even to the calendar will ensure that all appropriate Admin and Finance staff at OEM are aware of this annual requirement and follow up with subrecipients to receive completed pre risk assessments in advance of the new fiscal year. OEM?s Director of Admin and Finance will be the primary point of contact for pre risk assessment related inquiries from subrecipients, with the Assistant Deputy Chief of Administration serving as a backup point of contact. An event will also be added on the final business day of May each year to ensure that OEM staff follow up with subrecipients that were not responsive to the initial request. OEM will also institute a policy of requiring a written response following receipt of a SEFA letter from OEM detailing the previous fiscal year?s expenditures on behalf of a subrecipient. This written response will contain confirmation that the subrecipients have recorded the same expenditures in their accounting systems as OEM reported in the SEFA letter. Should there be any discrepancy between the information provided in the SEFA from OEM and the expenditures reported by the subrecipient, OEM will schedule a meeting to reconcile any differences and resolve discrepancies within 30 days of being notified of said discrepancies. The Director of Admin and Finance and the Assistant Deputy Chief of Administration will represent OEM in this meeting with the appropriate staff from the subrecipient reporting a discrepancy. Confirmation of resolution of any discrepancies will be documented in writing and attached to SEFA letters for record keeping purposes.
2022-001 ? Subrecipient Monitoring U.S. Department of Health and Human Services AL #93.421 Vaccine Ambassador Program Federal Grantor/ Pass-Through Grantor Grant Number Grant Period National Association of N/A 09/01/21 ? 12/30/22 Community Health Centers, Inc. Questioned costs: None How the questioned costs were computed: Not applicable Condition: NHCHC did not report subaward information to the subrecipient as required by 2 CFR section 200.331(a)(1). Criteria: Federal Regulation 2 CFR Section 200.331(a)(1) requires that subaward documents, including terms and conditions of the subaward, are provided to the subrecipients so they are aware of the award information to comply with federal statutes, regulations, and terms and conditions of the award. Cause: Management was unaware of the subrecipient monitoring requirements when NHCHC made subgrant awards and did not include the required information in the subgrant awards. Effect: Because of the above condition, NHCHC was not in compliance with this compliance requirement and a material weakness in internal controls over compliance exists. Recommendation: We recommend that NHCHC establish procedures to ensure it is aware of all terms and conditions of its grant awards and includes the required information in its subgrant awards. View of responsible official: Management agrees with the assessment and has committed to a corrective action plan.
2022-002 (Previously 2021-001) Subrecipient Monitoring Federal Agency: United States Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program Title: Child Care Development Fund Block Grant and Maternal, Infant, Early Childhood Homevisiting Assistance Listing Numbers: 93.575/596 and 93.870 Pass-Through Agency: 93.596 ? Passed through NM Department of Human Services ? 22-630-9000- 0005 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: 93.596: 22-630-9000-0005 -7/1/21-06/30/2022 2102 CCDF ? 10/1/2020-09/30/2023 93.870: X10MC43597 - 9/1/2021-9/29/23 X10MC39703 - 9/30/2020-9/29/2022 X11MC41939 -05/01/21-09/30/23 6X11MC45479-01-02 - 12/31/21-9/30/24 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control and Material Noncompliance (Modified Opinion) Condition: During our testing, we noted the following: 93.596: -2 of the 3 subrecipients identified did not have adequate documentation of formal financial monitoring activities during the year. The program did provide support for programmatic monitoring. - Additionally, the agreements did not contain language regarding suspension and debarment. -2 of the 3 applicable subrecipients tested did not have related FFATA reporting documentation, nor was there documentation provided to support a risk assessment process was undertaken prior to selecting these entities as subrecipients. 93.870: -For 3 out of 3 potential subrecipients, the Program has agreements with entities that identify subaward arrangements, but the program was not performing programmatic or financial monitoring procedures. Management?s response towards implementing prior-year corrective action plan: ECECD program managers began to perform financial monitoring in the form of reviews of federal audit reports, reviews of subrecipient single audits and reviewed general ledger outputs to determine proper PO creation and project ID tracking for PreK awards in FY `22. We also had identification of program elements related to management control (key stakeholder turnover, and system shocks) with program staff after feedback from our internal audit. ECECD is not certain about the status of subrecipient monitoring in other areas of the agency, however PreK program made great strides in remediation in this area for private and public PreK.2022-002 (Previously 2021-001) Subrecipient Monitoring (Continued) Condition (Continued): PreK has created draft policies and procedures for subrecipient monitoring at the program level that address allowability, financial monitoring, risk determinations. These policies and procedures are being reviewed for agency wide implementation for our grants compliance internal audit. These procedures are currently in use while we await approval by ASD and Executive Management. PreK also created a single guidance document and passed that out to all PreK stakeholders outlining allowability of expenditures that is a living document but I have attached this information here. This was developed and implemented with stakeholder training after our PreK internal audit identified this as an issue. Criteria or Specific Requirement: Per 2 CFR ?200.331 Requirements for pass-through entities, a non-federal entity must monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved. Passthrough entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include reviewing financial and performance reports required by the pass-through entity. Additionally, ?200.331(a) includes required elements that are to be included in the subawards. Questioned Costs: none Context: This was identified during our testing of the respective samples selected for subrecipient monitoring. See condition above. Cause: Lack of thorough communication between program and ASD staff regarding language to be included in subawards. Additionally, lack of emphasis placed on financial monitoring; focus is on programmatic monitoring. Additionally, with regarding to 93.870, current program personnel did not believe the entities qualified as a subrecipient and have communication from the federal agent to support that determination. However, current program personnel were unaware that the agreement between the Department and the entity identified the entity as a subrecipient because the determination was made by program personnel that did not have adequate experience with determination of subrecipients. Effect: The Department is not compliance with Federal Regulations. Repeat Finding: Yes Recommendation: We recommend the Department implement procedures to ensure compliance with required monitoring of its subrecipients, including review of financial reporting provided by its subrecipients. Additionally, we recommend the Department review the Federal Regulations to ensure the required elements are included in the subaward agreements. In general, the Department could benefit from improved processes over identification of entities at subrecipients or contractors and related tracking/monitoring of those entities identified as subrecipients.2022-002 (Previously 2021-001) Subrecipient Monitoring (Continued) Views of Responsible Officials: The Early Childhood Education and Care Department (ECECD) agrees with this audit finding and the Family Support and Early Intervention Division (FSEI) agrees with the recommendation that the Department could benefit from improved processes. To ensure this does not occur again, the FSEI Director and Deputy Director will implement procedures for program managers to ensure adequate compliance with required monitoring of its subrecipients, including review of financial reporting provided by its subrecipients. The FESI Director and Deputy Director will ensure that program staff are adequately trained on subrecipient monitoring. The FESI Director and Deputy Director will work with the Administrative Services Division (ASD) Director, Chief Financial Officer (CFO) and Grants Manager to verify subrecipient status and to ensure required elements are included in subaward agreements. Furthermore, the FSEI Director and Deputy Director will implement an internal review process to ensure program and financial monitoring is aligned and involves a third level of review by ASD Director, CFO and Grants Manager and other program personnel. The timeline is June 30, 2023.
2022-002 (Previously 2021-001) Subrecipient Monitoring Federal Agency: United States Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program Title: Child Care Development Fund Block Grant and Maternal, Infant, Early Childhood Homevisiting Assistance Listing Numbers: 93.575/596 and 93.870 Pass-Through Agency: 93.596 ? Passed through NM Department of Human Services ? 22-630-9000- 0005 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: 93.596: 22-630-9000-0005 -7/1/21-06/30/2022 2102 CCDF ? 10/1/2020-09/30/2023 93.870: X10MC43597 - 9/1/2021-9/29/23 X10MC39703 - 9/30/2020-9/29/2022 X11MC41939 -05/01/21-09/30/23 6X11MC45479-01-02 - 12/31/21-9/30/24 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control and Material Noncompliance (Modified Opinion) Condition: During our testing, we noted the following: 93.596: -2 of the 3 subrecipients identified did not have adequate documentation of formal financial monitoring activities during the year. The program did provide support for programmatic monitoring. - Additionally, the agreements did not contain language regarding suspension and debarment. -2 of the 3 applicable subrecipients tested did not have related FFATA reporting documentation, nor was there documentation provided to support a risk assessment process was undertaken prior to selecting these entities as subrecipients. 93.870: -For 3 out of 3 potential subrecipients, the Program has agreements with entities that identify subaward arrangements, but the program was not performing programmatic or financial monitoring procedures. Management?s response towards implementing prior-year corrective action plan: ECECD program managers began to perform financial monitoring in the form of reviews of federal audit reports, reviews of subrecipient single audits and reviewed general ledger outputs to determine proper PO creation and project ID tracking for PreK awards in FY `22. We also had identification of program elements related to management control (key stakeholder turnover, and system shocks) with program staff after feedback from our internal audit. ECECD is not certain about the status of subrecipient monitoring in other areas of the agency, however PreK program made great strides in remediation in this area for private and public PreK.2022-002 (Previously 2021-001) Subrecipient Monitoring (Continued) Condition (Continued): PreK has created draft policies and procedures for subrecipient monitoring at the program level that address allowability, financial monitoring, risk determinations. These policies and procedures are being reviewed for agency wide implementation for our grants compliance internal audit. These procedures are currently in use while we await approval by ASD and Executive Management. PreK also created a single guidance document and passed that out to all PreK stakeholders outlining allowability of expenditures that is a living document but I have attached this information here. This was developed and implemented with stakeholder training after our PreK internal audit identified this as an issue. Criteria or Specific Requirement: Per 2 CFR ?200.331 Requirements for pass-through entities, a non-federal entity must monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved. Passthrough entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include reviewing financial and performance reports required by the pass-through entity. Additionally, ?200.331(a) includes required elements that are to be included in the subawards. Questioned Costs: none Context: This was identified during our testing of the respective samples selected for subrecipient monitoring. See condition above. Cause: Lack of thorough communication between program and ASD staff regarding language to be included in subawards. Additionally, lack of emphasis placed on financial monitoring; focus is on programmatic monitoring. Additionally, with regarding to 93.870, current program personnel did not believe the entities qualified as a subrecipient and have communication from the federal agent to support that determination. However, current program personnel were unaware that the agreement between the Department and the entity identified the entity as a subrecipient because the determination was made by program personnel that did not have adequate experience with determination of subrecipients. Effect: The Department is not compliance with Federal Regulations. Repeat Finding: Yes Recommendation: We recommend the Department implement procedures to ensure compliance with required monitoring of its subrecipients, including review of financial reporting provided by its subrecipients. Additionally, we recommend the Department review the Federal Regulations to ensure the required elements are included in the subaward agreements. In general, the Department could benefit from improved processes over identification of entities at subrecipients or contractors and related tracking/monitoring of those entities identified as subrecipients.2022-002 (Previously 2021-001) Subrecipient Monitoring (Continued) Views of Responsible Officials: The Early Childhood Education and Care Department (ECECD) agrees with this audit finding and the Family Support and Early Intervention Division (FSEI) agrees with the recommendation that the Department could benefit from improved processes. To ensure this does not occur again, the FSEI Director and Deputy Director will implement procedures for program managers to ensure adequate compliance with required monitoring of its subrecipients, including review of financial reporting provided by its subrecipients. The FESI Director and Deputy Director will ensure that program staff are adequately trained on subrecipient monitoring. The FESI Director and Deputy Director will work with the Administrative Services Division (ASD) Director, Chief Financial Officer (CFO) and Grants Manager to verify subrecipient status and to ensure required elements are included in subaward agreements. Furthermore, the FSEI Director and Deputy Director will implement an internal review process to ensure program and financial monitoring is aligned and involves a third level of review by ASD Director, CFO and Grants Manager and other program personnel. The timeline is June 30, 2023.
2022-002 (Previously 2021-001) Subrecipient Monitoring Federal Agency: United States Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program Title: Child Care Development Fund Block Grant and Maternal, Infant, Early Childhood Homevisiting Assistance Listing Numbers: 93.575/596 and 93.870 Pass-Through Agency: 93.596 ? Passed through NM Department of Human Services ? 22-630-9000- 0005 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: 93.596: 22-630-9000-0005 -7/1/21-06/30/2022 2102 CCDF ? 10/1/2020-09/30/2023 93.870: X10MC43597 - 9/1/2021-9/29/23 X10MC39703 - 9/30/2020-9/29/2022 X11MC41939 -05/01/21-09/30/23 6X11MC45479-01-02 - 12/31/21-9/30/24 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control and Material Noncompliance (Modified Opinion) Condition: During our testing, we noted the following: 93.596: -2 of the 3 subrecipients identified did not have adequate documentation of formal financial monitoring activities during the year. The program did provide support for programmatic monitoring. - Additionally, the agreements did not contain language regarding suspension and debarment. -2 of the 3 applicable subrecipients tested did not have related FFATA reporting documentation, nor was there documentation provided to support a risk assessment process was undertaken prior to selecting these entities as subrecipients. 93.870: -For 3 out of 3 potential subrecipients, the Program has agreements with entities that identify subaward arrangements, but the program was not performing programmatic or financial monitoring procedures. Management?s response towards implementing prior-year corrective action plan: ECECD program managers began to perform financial monitoring in the form of reviews of federal audit reports, reviews of subrecipient single audits and reviewed general ledger outputs to determine proper PO creation and project ID tracking for PreK awards in FY `22. We also had identification of program elements related to management control (key stakeholder turnover, and system shocks) with program staff after feedback from our internal audit. ECECD is not certain about the status of subrecipient monitoring in other areas of the agency, however PreK program made great strides in remediation in this area for private and public PreK.2022-002 (Previously 2021-001) Subrecipient Monitoring (Continued) Condition (Continued): PreK has created draft policies and procedures for subrecipient monitoring at the program level that address allowability, financial monitoring, risk determinations. These policies and procedures are being reviewed for agency wide implementation for our grants compliance internal audit. These procedures are currently in use while we await approval by ASD and Executive Management. PreK also created a single guidance document and passed that out to all PreK stakeholders outlining allowability of expenditures that is a living document but I have attached this information here. This was developed and implemented with stakeholder training after our PreK internal audit identified this as an issue. Criteria or Specific Requirement: Per 2 CFR ?200.331 Requirements for pass-through entities, a non-federal entity must monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved. Passthrough entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include reviewing financial and performance reports required by the pass-through entity. Additionally, ?200.331(a) includes required elements that are to be included in the subawards. Questioned Costs: none Context: This was identified during our testing of the respective samples selected for subrecipient monitoring. See condition above. Cause: Lack of thorough communication between program and ASD staff regarding language to be included in subawards. Additionally, lack of emphasis placed on financial monitoring; focus is on programmatic monitoring. Additionally, with regarding to 93.870, current program personnel did not believe the entities qualified as a subrecipient and have communication from the federal agent to support that determination. However, current program personnel were unaware that the agreement between the Department and the entity identified the entity as a subrecipient because the determination was made by program personnel that did not have adequate experience with determination of subrecipients. Effect: The Department is not compliance with Federal Regulations. Repeat Finding: Yes Recommendation: We recommend the Department implement procedures to ensure compliance with required monitoring of its subrecipients, including review of financial reporting provided by its subrecipients. Additionally, we recommend the Department review the Federal Regulations to ensure the required elements are included in the subaward agreements. In general, the Department could benefit from improved processes over identification of entities at subrecipients or contractors and related tracking/monitoring of those entities identified as subrecipients.2022-002 (Previously 2021-001) Subrecipient Monitoring (Continued) Views of Responsible Officials: The Early Childhood Education and Care Department (ECECD) agrees with this audit finding and the Family Support and Early Intervention Division (FSEI) agrees with the recommendation that the Department could benefit from improved processes. To ensure this does not occur again, the FSEI Director and Deputy Director will implement procedures for program managers to ensure adequate compliance with required monitoring of its subrecipients, including review of financial reporting provided by its subrecipients. The FESI Director and Deputy Director will ensure that program staff are adequately trained on subrecipient monitoring. The FESI Director and Deputy Director will work with the Administrative Services Division (ASD) Director, Chief Financial Officer (CFO) and Grants Manager to verify subrecipient status and to ensure required elements are included in subaward agreements. Furthermore, the FSEI Director and Deputy Director will implement an internal review process to ensure program and financial monitoring is aligned and involves a third level of review by ASD Director, CFO and Grants Manager and other program personnel. The timeline is June 30, 2023.
2022-002 (Previously 2021-001) Subrecipient Monitoring Federal Agency: United States Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program Title: Child Care Development Fund Block Grant and Maternal, Infant, Early Childhood Homevisiting Assistance Listing Numbers: 93.575/596 and 93.870 Pass-Through Agency: 93.596 ? Passed through NM Department of Human Services ? 22-630-9000- 0005 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: 93.596: 22-630-9000-0005 -7/1/21-06/30/2022 2102 CCDF ? 10/1/2020-09/30/2023 93.870: X10MC43597 - 9/1/2021-9/29/23 X10MC39703 - 9/30/2020-9/29/2022 X11MC41939 -05/01/21-09/30/23 6X11MC45479-01-02 - 12/31/21-9/30/24 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control and Material Noncompliance (Modified Opinion) Condition: During our testing, we noted the following: 93.596: -2 of the 3 subrecipients identified did not have adequate documentation of formal financial monitoring activities during the year. The program did provide support for programmatic monitoring. - Additionally, the agreements did not contain language regarding suspension and debarment. -2 of the 3 applicable subrecipients tested did not have related FFATA reporting documentation, nor was there documentation provided to support a risk assessment process was undertaken prior to selecting these entities as subrecipients. 93.870: -For 3 out of 3 potential subrecipients, the Program has agreements with entities that identify subaward arrangements, but the program was not performing programmatic or financial monitoring procedures. Management?s response towards implementing prior-year corrective action plan: ECECD program managers began to perform financial monitoring in the form of reviews of federal audit reports, reviews of subrecipient single audits and reviewed general ledger outputs to determine proper PO creation and project ID tracking for PreK awards in FY `22. We also had identification of program elements related to management control (key stakeholder turnover, and system shocks) with program staff after feedback from our internal audit. ECECD is not certain about the status of subrecipient monitoring in other areas of the agency, however PreK program made great strides in remediation in this area for private and public PreK.2022-002 (Previously 2021-001) Subrecipient Monitoring (Continued) Condition (Continued): PreK has created draft policies and procedures for subrecipient monitoring at the program level that address allowability, financial monitoring, risk determinations. These policies and procedures are being reviewed for agency wide implementation for our grants compliance internal audit. These procedures are currently in use while we await approval by ASD and Executive Management. PreK also created a single guidance document and passed that out to all PreK stakeholders outlining allowability of expenditures that is a living document but I have attached this information here. This was developed and implemented with stakeholder training after our PreK internal audit identified this as an issue. Criteria or Specific Requirement: Per 2 CFR ?200.331 Requirements for pass-through entities, a non-federal entity must monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved. Passthrough entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include reviewing financial and performance reports required by the pass-through entity. Additionally, ?200.331(a) includes required elements that are to be included in the subawards. Questioned Costs: none Context: This was identified during our testing of the respective samples selected for subrecipient monitoring. See condition above. Cause: Lack of thorough communication between program and ASD staff regarding language to be included in subawards. Additionally, lack of emphasis placed on financial monitoring; focus is on programmatic monitoring. Additionally, with regarding to 93.870, current program personnel did not believe the entities qualified as a subrecipient and have communication from the federal agent to support that determination. However, current program personnel were unaware that the agreement between the Department and the entity identified the entity as a subrecipient because the determination was made by program personnel that did not have adequate experience with determination of subrecipients. Effect: The Department is not compliance with Federal Regulations. Repeat Finding: Yes Recommendation: We recommend the Department implement procedures to ensure compliance with required monitoring of its subrecipients, including review of financial reporting provided by its subrecipients. Additionally, we recommend the Department review the Federal Regulations to ensure the required elements are included in the subaward agreements. In general, the Department could benefit from improved processes over identification of entities at subrecipients or contractors and related tracking/monitoring of those entities identified as subrecipients.2022-002 (Previously 2021-001) Subrecipient Monitoring (Continued) Views of Responsible Officials: The Early Childhood Education and Care Department (ECECD) agrees with this audit finding and the Family Support and Early Intervention Division (FSEI) agrees with the recommendation that the Department could benefit from improved processes. To ensure this does not occur again, the FSEI Director and Deputy Director will implement procedures for program managers to ensure adequate compliance with required monitoring of its subrecipients, including review of financial reporting provided by its subrecipients. The FESI Director and Deputy Director will ensure that program staff are adequately trained on subrecipient monitoring. The FESI Director and Deputy Director will work with the Administrative Services Division (ASD) Director, Chief Financial Officer (CFO) and Grants Manager to verify subrecipient status and to ensure required elements are included in subaward agreements. Furthermore, the FSEI Director and Deputy Director will implement an internal review process to ensure program and financial monitoring is aligned and involves a third level of review by ASD Director, CFO and Grants Manager and other program personnel. The timeline is June 30, 2023.
Finding No.: 2022-004 Monitoring Procedures and Risk Assessment Process Federal Agency: Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) Assistance Listing No.: 93.958 Requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Type of Finding: Material Weakness Program: Block Grants for Community Mental Health Services Federal award no. and year: 1B09SM082596-01 10/01/19 ? 09/30/21 1B09SM083798-01 10/01/20 ? 09/30/22 1B09SM083952-01 03/15/21 ? 03/14/23 1B09SM085353-01 03/01/21 ? 09/30/25 1B09SM085881-01 09/01/21 ? 09/30/25 Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR section 200.331, all pass-through entities must monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved. In addition, all pass-through entities must evaluate each subrecipient?s risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring. Condition: Although the program did not have any subrecipients that required a single audit report to be obtained during the fiscal year, we were informed by program personnel that the program was unable to fill vacant positions that would monitor this compliance requirement. As a result, the control over this compliance requirement was not in place during the current fiscal year. Context: The program had six subrecipients in FY2022, none of which expended more than $750,000 during the year. However, the program did not have any personnel monitoring subrecipient expenditures and reviewing single audit reports as applicable. Cause: According to management, the program did not have sufficient staff available who are qualified to conduct subrecipient monitoring. Effect: Failure to properly monitor subrecipients could lead to noncompliance with the subrecipient monitoring requirement. Questioned Costs: None Identification as a Repeat Finding, if applicable: See finding 2021-005 included in the Summary Schedule of Prior Audit Findings. Recommendation: We recommend the Department hire adequate staff resources to follow its procedures and internal controls to ensure compliance with Federal requirements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: See Part VI Correction Action Plan.
Finding No.: 2022-004 Monitoring Procedures and Risk Assessment Process Federal Agency: Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) Assistance Listing No.: 93.958 Requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Type of Finding: Material Weakness Program: Block Grants for Community Mental Health Services Federal award no. and year: 1B09SM082596-01 10/01/19 ? 09/30/21 1B09SM083798-01 10/01/20 ? 09/30/22 1B09SM083952-01 03/15/21 ? 03/14/23 1B09SM085353-01 03/01/21 ? 09/30/25 1B09SM085881-01 09/01/21 ? 09/30/25 Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR section 200.331, all pass-through entities must monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved. In addition, all pass-through entities must evaluate each subrecipient?s risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring. Condition: Although the program did not have any subrecipients that required a single audit report to be obtained during the fiscal year, we were informed by program personnel that the program was unable to fill vacant positions that would monitor this compliance requirement. As a result, the control over this compliance requirement was not in place during the current fiscal year. Context: The program had six subrecipients in FY2022, none of which expended more than $750,000 during the year. However, the program did not have any personnel monitoring subrecipient expenditures and reviewing single audit reports as applicable. Cause: According to management, the program did not have sufficient staff available who are qualified to conduct subrecipient monitoring. Effect: Failure to properly monitor subrecipients could lead to noncompliance with the subrecipient monitoring requirement. Questioned Costs: None Identification as a Repeat Finding, if applicable: See finding 2021-005 included in the Summary Schedule of Prior Audit Findings. Recommendation: We recommend the Department hire adequate staff resources to follow its procedures and internal controls to ensure compliance with Federal requirements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: See Part VI Correction Action Plan.
Finding No.: 2022-009 Subrecipient Monitoring Federal Agency: Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) Assistance Listing No.: 93.243 Requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Type of Finding: Material Noncompliance and Material Weakness Program: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Federal award no. and year: 5H79SP081001-03 09/30/20 ? 09/29/21 5H79SP081001-04 09/30/21 ? 09/29/22 5H79TI026663-05 09/30/20 ? 09/29/21 5H79TI080196-04 09/30/20 ? 09/29/21 Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR section 200.331, all pass-through entities must monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved. In addition, all pass-through entities must evaluate each subrecipient?s risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring. Condition: The program did not comply with its documented monitoring procedures consistently. Context: Of a total 19 contracts, we selected three contracts based on a non-statistical sample. We noted that for one of the three contracts selected, the required monitoring procedures were not performed based on the program?s documented procedures. Cause: There was a lack of diligence in following documented monitoring procedures. Effect: Failure to follow a subrecipient monitoring policy that meets the requirements in 2 CFR section 200.331 results in noncompliance with the subrecipient monitoring requirement. Questioned Costs: None Identification as a Repeat Finding, if applicable: Not applicable Recommendation: We recommend that management follow its documented monitoring procedures for all subrecipient contracts. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: See Part VI Corrective Action Plan.
Department of Education, passed through the Minnesota Department of Education CFDA No. 84.027 and 84.173, award numbers 0397-52-000 FIN 419, 0397-52-000 FIN 420, 0397-52-000 FIN 140, 0397-52-000 FIN 425 Award year 2022 Special Education Cluster Subrecipient Monitoring Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Material Noncompliance Criteria ? Requirements contained in 2 CFR Part 200.331 specifies that pass-through entities be responsible for identifying Federal Award information and applicable compliance requirements at the time of awards to subrecipients; for monitoring the subrecipient?s use of Federal awards; providing reasonable assurance that the subrecipient administers Federal awards in compliance with laws, regulations, and the provisions of contracts or grant agreements; ensuring that subrecipients have required audits completed, reviewing the results of those audits; and evaluating the impact of subrecipient activities on the pass-through entity?s ability to comply with applicable Federal regulations. Condition ? The agreements between Lake Agassiz Education Cooperative and its subrecipients did not contain language set forth in 2 CFR 200.331 and no formal subrecipient monitoring procedures were being performed. Cause ? Lake Agassiz Education Cooperative?s agreements with subrecipients must properly follow Uniform Guidance and no formal monitoring procedures were in place. Effect ? Lacking controls could lead to noncompliance with the requirements of the program by subrecipients and could require the return of grant funds to the grantor agency or the entity receiving less grant funds than they were eligible for. Questioned Costs ? None reported Context/Sampling ? Testing of 100% of the subrecipient entities were selected for subrecipient monitoring testing. Repeat Finding from Prior Year ? No, as a Uniform Guidance audit was not required in the previous two years. Recommendation ? We recommend Lake Agassiz Education Cooperative maintain formal agreements with the subrecipient entities that include the Uniform Guidance language and implement formal monitoring processes over subrecipient entities. Views of Responsible Officials ? There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Department of Education, passed through the Minnesota Department of Education CFDA No. 84.027 and 84.173, award numbers 0397-52-000 FIN 419, 0397-52-000 FIN 420, 0397-52-000 FIN 140, 0397-52-000 FIN 425 Award year 2022 Special Education Cluster Subrecipient Monitoring Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Material Noncompliance Criteria ? Requirements contained in 2 CFR Part 200.331 specifies that pass-through entities be responsible for identifying Federal Award information and applicable compliance requirements at the time of awards to subrecipients; for monitoring the subrecipient?s use of Federal awards; providing reasonable assurance that the subrecipient administers Federal awards in compliance with laws, regulations, and the provisions of contracts or grant agreements; ensuring that subrecipients have required audits completed, reviewing the results of those audits; and evaluating the impact of subrecipient activities on the pass-through entity?s ability to comply with applicable Federal regulations. Condition ? The agreements between Lake Agassiz Education Cooperative and its subrecipients did not contain language set forth in 2 CFR 200.331 and no formal subrecipient monitoring procedures were being performed. Cause ? Lake Agassiz Education Cooperative?s agreements with subrecipients must properly follow Uniform Guidance and no formal monitoring procedures were in place. Effect ? Lacking controls could lead to noncompliance with the requirements of the program by subrecipients and could require the return of grant funds to the grantor agency or the entity receiving less grant funds than they were eligible for. Questioned Costs ? None reported Context/Sampling ? Testing of 100% of the subrecipient entities were selected for subrecipient monitoring testing. Repeat Finding from Prior Year ? No, as a Uniform Guidance audit was not required in the previous two years. Recommendation ? We recommend Lake Agassiz Education Cooperative maintain formal agreements with the subrecipient entities that include the Uniform Guidance language and implement formal monitoring processes over subrecipient entities. Views of Responsible Officials ? There is no disagreement with the audit finding.