Cluster: Research and Development Federal Agency: All awards with subrecipients on the SEFA Award Names: All awards with subrecipients on the SEFA Award Numbers: All awards with subrecipients on the SEFA Assistance Listing Title: All awards with subrecipients on the SEFA Assistance Listing Number: All awards with subrecipients on the SEFA Award Year: 2021 - 2022 Pass-through entity: All pass-through entities noted on the SEFA Criteria 2 CFR 200.332 notes that pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: 1. Reviewing financial and performance reports required by the pass-through entity. 2. Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity detected through audits, on-site reviews, and written confirmation from the subrecipient, highlighting the status of actions planned or taken to address Single Audit findings related to the particular subaward. 3. Issuing a management decision for applicable audit findings pertaining only to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity as required by 2 CFR 200.521. Further, Uniform Guidance 2 CFR section 200.331(f) requires that the entity verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F? Audit Requirements when it is expected that the subrecipient?s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in ?200.501 Audit requirements ($750,000). Condition In testing conformity with the compliance requirements for subrecipient monitoring, we selected 7 of the 61 Research and Development subrecipient agreements and the one Opioid STR subrecipient agreement from the detailed listings provided for testing. The total federal funds passed through to subrecipients in FY22 amounted to $3.5 million for the Research & Development Cluster, and $24,500 for the Opioid STR program. For all of our selections, the most recent audit report was not reviewed for purposes of ongoing monitoring as required by the Uniform Guidance. The Health System has a risk assessment form that is completed at contract inception for its subrecipients; however, the risk assessment is not reassessed annually for all subrecipients. The most recent risk assessment form was conducted in 2018 for 2 selections, in 2019 for 2 selections, in 2020 for 2 selections and in 2021 for 2 selections. We further noted that 7 of the 8 risk assessment forms selected for testing did not include explicit documentation detailing the subrecipient audit report review (such as what year was reviewed, what were the results of the review, etc.). Additionally, for one selection, the initial subrecipient risk assessment form was reviewed after the subrecipient award agreement was executed. Cause The Health System?s subrecipient policy does not explicitly state the ongoing monitoring activities that must be conducted or the frequency of required monitoring. For instance, the policy does not outlinemonitoring activities that are required for all subrecipients. Additionally, the risk assessment form does not prescribe the details of the subrecipient audit report review that should be documented. Effect The subrecipients of the Health System may have audit findings pertaining to the Federal award provided from the Health System that may have implications on the compliance of the Health System with Uniform Guidance. Additionally, there may be changes in the risk characteristics of subrecipients that are not identified if risk assessments are not periodically updated. Questioned Costs None noted. Recommendation We recommend that he Health System update its subrecipient monitoring policy to reflect all monitoring compliance requirements of the Uniform Guidance. In particular, the policy should require the receipt of the Uniform Guidance report from all subrecipients that expended $750,000 or more in federal awards during the subrecipient?s fiscal year (or the receipt of the subrecipient?s latest financial statements if not) at contract inception. Any audit findings pertaining to the Federal award should be followed up on by the Health System and a management decision should be issued. This Policy should be distributed and adhered to by all that have a role in the subrecipient monitoring process of the Health System. Management?s Views and Corrective Action Plan Management?s response is included in ?Management?s Views and Corrective Action Plan? included at the end of this report after the summary schedule of status of prior audit findings.
Cluster: Research and Development Federal Agency: All awards with subrecipients on the SEFA Award Names: All awards with subrecipients on the SEFA Award Numbers: All awards with subrecipients on the SEFA Assistance Listing Title: All awards with subrecipients on the SEFA Assistance Listing Number: All awards with subrecipients on the SEFA Award Year: 2021 - 2022 Pass-through entity: All pass-through entities noted on the SEFA Criteria 2 CFR 200.332 notes that pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: 1. Reviewing financial and performance reports required by the pass-through entity. 2. Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity detected through audits, on-site reviews, and written confirmation from the subrecipient, highlighting the status of actions planned or taken to address Single Audit findings related to the particular subaward. 3. Issuing a management decision for applicable audit findings pertaining only to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity as required by 2 CFR 200.521. Further, Uniform Guidance 2 CFR section 200.331(f) requires that the entity verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F? Audit Requirements when it is expected that the subrecipient?s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in ?200.501 Audit requirements ($750,000). Condition In testing conformity with the compliance requirements for subrecipient monitoring, we selected 7 of the 61 Research and Development subrecipient agreements and the one Opioid STR subrecipient agreement from the detailed listings provided for testing. The total federal funds passed through to subrecipients in FY22 amounted to $3.5 million for the Research & Development Cluster, and $24,500 for the Opioid STR program. For all of our selections, the most recent audit report was not reviewed for purposes of ongoing monitoring as required by the Uniform Guidance. The Health System has a risk assessment form that is completed at contract inception for its subrecipients; however, the risk assessment is not reassessed annually for all subrecipients. The most recent risk assessment form was conducted in 2018 for 2 selections, in 2019 for 2 selections, in 2020 for 2 selections and in 2021 for 2 selections. We further noted that 7 of the 8 risk assessment forms selected for testing did not include explicit documentation detailing the subrecipient audit report review (such as what year was reviewed, what were the results of the review, etc.). Additionally, for one selection, the initial subrecipient risk assessment form was reviewed after the subrecipient award agreement was executed. Cause The Health System?s subrecipient policy does not explicitly state the ongoing monitoring activities that must be conducted or the frequency of required monitoring. For instance, the policy does not outlinemonitoring activities that are required for all subrecipients. Additionally, the risk assessment form does not prescribe the details of the subrecipient audit report review that should be documented. Effect The subrecipients of the Health System may have audit findings pertaining to the Federal award provided from the Health System that may have implications on the compliance of the Health System with Uniform Guidance. Additionally, there may be changes in the risk characteristics of subrecipients that are not identified if risk assessments are not periodically updated. Questioned Costs None noted. Recommendation We recommend that he Health System update its subrecipient monitoring policy to reflect all monitoring compliance requirements of the Uniform Guidance. In particular, the policy should require the receipt of the Uniform Guidance report from all subrecipients that expended $750,000 or more in federal awards during the subrecipient?s fiscal year (or the receipt of the subrecipient?s latest financial statements if not) at contract inception. Any audit findings pertaining to the Federal award should be followed up on by the Health System and a management decision should be issued. This Policy should be distributed and adhered to by all that have a role in the subrecipient monitoring process of the Health System. Management?s Views and Corrective Action Plan Management?s response is included in ?Management?s Views and Corrective Action Plan? included at the end of this report after the summary schedule of status of prior audit findings.
Program: Housing Voucher Cluster Assistance Listing No.: 14.871, 14.879 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Passed-through: n/a ? direct award Award Number and Year: CA131, 2021/2022 Compliance Requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance, Material Noncompliance Criteria: 2 CFR 200.331(a) establishes the required elements that the pass-through entity (County) must include in their subrecipient agreements. 2 CFR 200.331(b) establishes the requirement that the pass-through entity must evaluate the risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and terms and conditions of the program for each subaward for the purpose of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring activities. 2 CFR 200.331(d) and 2 CFR 200.331(e) establishes the requirement that the pass-through entity must monitor the activities of each subrecipient of program funds to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward and achieves performance goals. 2 CFR 200.331(d) requires that the monitoring activities must include: 1) Reviewing of financial and performance reports as required by the pass-through entity. 2) Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means. 3) Issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity as required by ?200.521 Management decision. 2 CRF 200.331(f) establishes the requirement for the pass-through entity to verify whether the subrecipient is subject to a single audit when the subrecipient?s expenditures are expected to exceed the threshold set forth in 2 CRF 200.501. Condition: In 1 out of 1 instance selected, we found that the subrecipient agreement did not contain the federal award identification elements required to be communicated by the County. We found that the County did not have documented policies or procedures for the evaluation of the subrecipient?s risk of noncompliance with program requirements prior to awarding the subrecipient contract. We also found that the County did not have documented monitoring procedures to be followed based on the assessed level of risk of noncompliance. Furthermore, the County did not have documented procedures to verify whether the subrecipient was subject to a single audit. As a result, we found that in 1 out of 1 instance selected, a documented assessment of the subrecipient?s risk of noncompliance was not performed. In this same instance, a documented review of whether the subrecipient was subject to a single audit was also not performed. Cause: The County did not have documented policies and procedures over subrecipient monitoring to ensure that the required risk assessments and monitoring procedures were performed. The County?s subrecipient contracting procedures also did not require the inclusion of the required elements. Effect: The County did not include all the required elements in their subawards and did not perform appropriate monitoring procedures over the subrecipients. Questioned Costs: No known questioned costs identified. Context/Sampling: We selected 100% of the County?s subrecipients of the program. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): Yes, prior year finding 2021-004. Recommendation: We recommend that the County establish documented policies and procedures over subrecipient monitoring, including a documented risk assessment, monitoring procedures, and contract reviews. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding. See separate corrective action plan.
Program: Housing Voucher Cluster Assistance Listing No.: 14.871, 14.879 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Passed-through: n/a ? direct award Award Number and Year: CA131, 2021/2022 Compliance Requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance, Material Noncompliance Criteria: 2 CFR 200.331(a) establishes the required elements that the pass-through entity (County) must include in their subrecipient agreements. 2 CFR 200.331(b) establishes the requirement that the pass-through entity must evaluate the risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and terms and conditions of the program for each subaward for the purpose of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring activities. 2 CFR 200.331(d) and 2 CFR 200.331(e) establishes the requirement that the pass-through entity must monitor the activities of each subrecipient of program funds to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward and achieves performance goals. 2 CFR 200.331(d) requires that the monitoring activities must include: 1) Reviewing of financial and performance reports as required by the pass-through entity. 2) Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means. 3) Issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity as required by ?200.521 Management decision. 2 CRF 200.331(f) establishes the requirement for the pass-through entity to verify whether the subrecipient is subject to a single audit when the subrecipient?s expenditures are expected to exceed the threshold set forth in 2 CRF 200.501. Condition: In 1 out of 1 instance selected, we found that the subrecipient agreement did not contain the federal award identification elements required to be communicated by the County. We found that the County did not have documented policies or procedures for the evaluation of the subrecipient?s risk of noncompliance with program requirements prior to awarding the subrecipient contract. We also found that the County did not have documented monitoring procedures to be followed based on the assessed level of risk of noncompliance. Furthermore, the County did not have documented procedures to verify whether the subrecipient was subject to a single audit. As a result, we found that in 1 out of 1 instance selected, a documented assessment of the subrecipient?s risk of noncompliance was not performed. In this same instance, a documented review of whether the subrecipient was subject to a single audit was also not performed. Cause: The County did not have documented policies and procedures over subrecipient monitoring to ensure that the required risk assessments and monitoring procedures were performed. The County?s subrecipient contracting procedures also did not require the inclusion of the required elements. Effect: The County did not include all the required elements in their subawards and did not perform appropriate monitoring procedures over the subrecipients. Questioned Costs: No known questioned costs identified. Context/Sampling: We selected 100% of the County?s subrecipients of the program. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): Yes, prior year finding 2021-004. Recommendation: We recommend that the County establish documented policies and procedures over subrecipient monitoring, including a documented risk assessment, monitoring procedures, and contract reviews. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding. See separate corrective action plan.
Program: Emergency Rental Assistance Program Assistance Listing No.: 21.023 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of the Treasury Passed-through: n/a ? direct award Award Number and Year: Not Applicable, 2021/2022 Compliance Requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance, Material Noncompliance Criteria: 2 CFR 200.331(a) establishes the required elements that the pass-through entity (County) must include in their subrecipient agreements. 2 CFR 200.331(b) establishes the requirement that the pass-through entity must evaluate the risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and terms and conditions of the program for each subaward for the purpose of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring activities. 2 CFR 200.331(d) and 2 CFR 200.331(e) establishes the requirement that the pass-through entity must monitor the activities of each subrecipient of program funds to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward and achieves performance goals. 2 CFR 200.331(d) requires that the monitoring activities must include: 1. Reviewing of financial and performance reports as required by the pass-through entity. 2. Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means. 3. Issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity as required by ?200.521 Management decision. 2 CRF 200.331(f) establishes the requirement for the pass-through entity to verify whether the subrecipient is subject to a single audit when the subrecipient?s expenditures are expected to exceed the threshold set forth in 2 CRF 200.501. Condition: In 1 out of 1 instance selected, we found that the subrecipient agreement did not contain the federal award identification elements required to be communicated by the County. We found that the County did not have documented policies or procedures for the evaluation of the subrecipient?s risk of noncompliance with program requirements prior to awarding the subrecipient contract. We also found that the County did not have documented monitoring procedures to be followed based on the assessed level of risk of noncompliance. Furthermore, the County did not have documented procedures to verify whether the subrecipient was subject to a single audit. As a result, we found that in 1 out of 1 instance selected, a documented assessment of the subrecipient?s risk of noncompliance was not performed. In this same instance, a documented review of whether the subrecipient was subject to a single audit was also not performed. Cause: The County did not have documented policies and procedures over subrecipient monitoring to ensure that the required risk assessments and monitoring procedures were performed. The County?s subrecipient contracting procedures also did not require the inclusion of the required elements. Effect: The County did not include all the required elements in their subawards and did not perform appropriate monitoring procedures over the subrecipients. Questioned Costs: None noted. Context/Sampling: We selected 100% of the County?s subrecipients of the program. $6,177,719 was paid to the subrecipient during the fiscal year. Repeat Finding from Prior Year: No. Recommendation: We recommend that the County establish documented policies and procedures over subrecipient monitoring, including a documented risk assessment, monitoring procedures, and contract reviews. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding. See separate corrective action plan.
Finding Reference Number: 2022-004 NH Governor?s Office of Emergency Relief and Recovery COVID-19 Coronavirus Relief Fund (Assistance Listing #21.019) Federal Award Numbers: Not Applicable Federal Award Year: 2020 U.S. Department of Treasury Compliance Requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency Prior Year Finding: 2021-011 Statistically Valid Sample: No Criteria A pass-through entity must: 1. Clearly identify to the subrecipient required award information and applicable requirements described in 2 CFR section 200.331(a); 2. Evaluate each subrecipient?s risk of noncompliance for the purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring related to the subaward (2 CFR section 300.331(b)); and 3. Issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to federal award provided to the subrecipient from the subrecipient as required by 2 CFR section 200.521. Additionally, 2 CFR section 200.303(a) states that non-federal entities must establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provide reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. Condition Under the Coronavirus Relief Fund Program (CRF), the State of New Hampshire (the State) entered into various grant agreements with a third parties to provide program services under the CRF program. As part of our testwork over the subrecipient monitoring process, we noted the following breakdown of internal controls: A. The State communicates award information to the subrecipient through the approved grant agreement. During our testwork over the communication of award information, we noted instances where the State did not communicate all the required award information as outlined in 2 CFR section 200.331. Specifically, we noted the following: a. The indirect cost rate for the federal award, including if the de minimis rate is charged, was not included in each of the 7 grant agreements selected for testwork. b. Identification of whether the award is R&D was not included in 2 of 7 grant agreements selected for testwork. B. For 5 of 7 subrecipients selected for testwork, there was no evidence provided that a risk assessment had been performed for the subrecipient. While a risk assessment was not performed, we noted that for all 7 subrecipients selected for testwork that the State performed during the award monitoring procedures. C. The State did not appear to have policies and procedures over internal controls in place to determine if a subrecipient had a Uniform Guidance report if the amount awarded to the subrecipient under the CRF program was under the audit threshold of $750,000. Based on our independent review of uniform guidance submissions within the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, none of the 7 subrecipients selected for testwork had a submitted uniform guidance report, and as such, a management decision letter would not have been required to be submitted for the each of the 7 subrecipients. Cause The cause of the condition found is due to insufficient policies and internal controls to ensure that grant agreements contain the appropriate award notification information, that documented risk assessments are performed and that a comprehensive review to determine if subrecipients had a uniform guidance submitted regardless of the amount awarded under this federal award. Effect The effect of the condition found is that the State did not have sufficient internal controls in place in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.303(a)) and 200.332.(a). In addition, subrecipients could have had a uniform guidance report issued in which a management decision letter needed to be issued but as the Department does not evaluate this for subrecipient?s that were not granted more than $750,000, they would not be able to recognize the need for a management decision letter timely. Questioned Costs None. Recommendation We recommend that the State review its existing internal controls, policies, and procedures to ensure that the State complies with the provisions of 2 CFR section 200.332(a), 2 CFR section 200.332(b), and 2 CFR section 200.251. This would include ensuring that: 1. All required award information is communicated to subrecipients; 2. Documented risk assessments are performed over all subrecipients; and 3. All subrecipients are reviewed regardless of amount awarded to determine if a uniform guidance report was issued and if a management decision letter should be issued. View of Responsible Officials The State concurs in part with the findings and concurs in part with the recommendations. Given that CARES Act CRF is a funding source that is no longer eligible for use because program obligations were required to be entered into by December 31, 2021, and program expenditures complete by September 30, 2022, there are no ongoing CRF funded projects or programs. As a result, any corrective actions would relate to ensuring any other federal funding sources are achieving compliance requirements. With regard to condition A, the State partially concurs. Federal guidance concerning CARES Act CRF did not allow for charging indirect costs. That guidance indicated ?Payments from the Fund are not administered as part of a traditional grant program and the provisions of the Uniform Guidance, 2 CFR part 200, that are applicable to indirect costs do not apply. Recipients may not apply their indirect costs rates to payments received from the Fund.? Thus, awardees and recipients of funds were not permitted to charge indirect costs against CARES Act CRF. However, the state acknowledges inclusion of language specifically acknowledging the disallowance of indirect costs could have been included in the agreements. With regard to condition B, the State concurs. The four identified subrecipients were awardees of a program that was facilitated at the very end of CARES Act CRF eligibility for the period of performance. This program was run due to updated guidance by U.S. Treasury on December 14, 2021, that extended the deadline for expenditure of funds so long as obligations were entered into by December 31, 2021. That program largely resulted in direct beneficiary awards, but due to the nature of some expenditures awarded some entities received a subaward. Those subawards identified a brief timeline for project completion, between December 2021 and September 2022. Most projects were completed in February and March, with two of the subrecipients finalizing projects in September. Given the nature and timing of the program, those subawardees were closely monitored and regularly interacted with the State in order to receive reimbursement for eligible expenses and complete projects. The State can provide documentation of that monitoring and expense review. However, formal risk assessments were not initially done for those entities. Since then, the State has implemented policies and procedures that help ensure risk assessments are completed for all subrecipients, regardless of the nature of the program. With regard to condition C, the State concurs and has already implemented corrective actions to ensure procedures and policies are in place concerning Uniform Guidance Report review and the issuance of any necessary management decision letters to the extent required and where this deficiency could impact any other sources of federal funding. It is worth noting that the State in most cases has timely conducted risk assessments of subrecipients and reviewed relevant Uniform Guidance Reports, but its corrective action will result in better documentation of that process and protocol. Anticipated Completion Date: The corrective actions indicated above have already been implemented as of the date of this response. Contact Person: Steve Giovinelli and Chase Hagaman
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 21.027, Department of Treasury, COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund (CSLFRF) Federal Award Identification Number and Year - N/A Pass-through Entity - N/A Finding Type - Significant deficiency and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - Per 2 CFR 200.332 (a), all pass-through entities must ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the following information at the time of the subaward and, if any of these data elements change, include the changes in subsequent subaward modification. When some of this information is not available, the pass-through entity must provide the best information available to describe the federal award and subaward. Required information includes the following: (1) Federal award identification (i) Subrecipient name (which must match the name associated with its unique entity identifier) (ii) Subrecipient's unique entity identifier (iii) Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN) (iv) Federal award date (see the definition of federal award date in ? 200.1 of this part) of award to the recipient by the federal agency (v) Subaward period of performance start and end date (vi) Subaward budget period start and end date (vii) Amount of federal funds obligated by this action by the pass-through entity to the subrecipient (viii) Total amount of federal funds obligated to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity, including the current financial obligation (ix) Total amount of the federal award committed to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity (x) Federal award project description, as required to be responsive to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) (xi) Name of federal awarding agency, pass-through entity, and contact information for awarding official of the pass-through entity (xii) Assistance Listing Numbers and title; the pass-through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each federal award and the Assistance Listing Numbers at time of disbursement (xiii) Identification of whether the award is R&D (xiv) Indirect cost rate for the federal award (including if the de minimis rate is charged) per ? 200.414 Condition - The CSLFRF subrecipient agreements did not include the CSLFRF assistance Listing Number (ALN), as required per 2 CFR 200.332 (a)(1)(xii). Questioned Costs - None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - During the fiscal year, the City passed through CSLFRF funding to three subrecipients. The agreements with the subrecipients included a reference to the applicable regulations provided by the Treasury and all the elements outlined under 2 CFR 200.331 (a)(1) with the exception of the ALN. Cause and Effect - The City?s controls did not ensure that the subrecipient agreements included all the required elements, as outlined under 2 CFR 200.332 (a)(1). The lack of information could result in noncompliance by the subrecipient, as well as incorrect SEFA reporting. Recommendation - We recommend the City implement adequate controls to ensure subrecipient agreements included all the required elements, as outlined under 2 CFR 200.332 a)(1). Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - The City has implemented a process to ensure that all subrecipient agreements contain the federal ALN, as required by 2 CFR 200.332. All subrecipient agreements will include a new exhibit as an attachment in the agreement that will include the ALN and any other required grant elements.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 21.027, Department of Treasury, COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund (CSLFRF) Federal Award Identification Number and Year - N/A Pass-through Entity - N/A Finding Type - Significant deficiency and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - Per 2 CFR 200.332 (a), all pass-through entities must ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the following information at the time of the subaward and, if any of these data elements change, include the changes in subsequent subaward modification. When some of this information is not available, the pass-through entity must provide the best information available to describe the federal award and subaward. Required information includes the following: (1) Federal award identification (i) Subrecipient name (which must match the name associated with its unique entity identifier) (ii) Subrecipient's unique entity identifier (iii) Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN) (iv) Federal award date (see the definition of federal award date in ? 200.1 of this part) of award to the recipient by the federal agency (v) Subaward period of performance start and end date (vi) Subaward budget period start and end date (vii) Amount of federal funds obligated by this action by the pass-through entity to the subrecipient (viii) Total amount of federal funds obligated to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity, including the current financial obligation (ix) Total amount of the federal award committed to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity (x) Federal award project description, as required to be responsive to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) (xi) Name of federal awarding agency, pass-through entity, and contact information for awarding official of the pass-through entity (xii) Assistance Listing Numbers and title; the pass-through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each federal award and the Assistance Listing Numbers at time of disbursement (xiii) Identification of whether the award is R&D (xiv) Indirect cost rate for the federal award (including if the de minimis rate is charged) per ? 200.414 Condition - The CSLFRF subrecipient agreements did not include the CSLFRF assistance Listing Number (ALN), as required per 2 CFR 200.332 (a)(1)(xii). Questioned Costs - None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - During the fiscal year, the City passed through CSLFRF funding to three subrecipients. The agreements with the subrecipients included a reference to the applicable regulations provided by the Treasury and all the elements outlined under 2 CFR 200.331 (a)(1) with the exception of the ALN. Cause and Effect - The City?s controls did not ensure that the subrecipient agreements included all the required elements, as outlined under 2 CFR 200.332 (a)(1). The lack of information could result in noncompliance by the subrecipient, as well as incorrect SEFA reporting. Recommendation - We recommend the City implement adequate controls to ensure subrecipient agreements included all the required elements, as outlined under 2 CFR 200.332 a)(1). Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - The City has implemented a process to ensure that all subrecipient agreements contain the federal ALN, as required by 2 CFR 200.332. All subrecipient agreements will include a new exhibit as an attachment in the agreement that will include the ALN and any other required grant elements.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 21.027, Department of Treasury, COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund (CSLFRF) Federal Award Identification Number and Year - N/A Pass-through Entity - N/A Finding Type - Significant deficiency and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - Per 2 CFR 200.332 (a), all pass-through entities must ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the following information at the time of the subaward and, if any of these data elements change, include the changes in subsequent subaward modification. When some of this information is not available, the pass-through entity must provide the best information available to describe the federal award and subaward. Required information includes the following: (1) Federal award identification (i) Subrecipient name (which must match the name associated with its unique entity identifier) (ii) Subrecipient's unique entity identifier (iii) Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN) (iv) Federal award date (see the definition of federal award date in ? 200.1 of this part) of award to the recipient by the federal agency (v) Subaward period of performance start and end date (vi) Subaward budget period start and end date (vii) Amount of federal funds obligated by this action by the pass-through entity to the subrecipient (viii) Total amount of federal funds obligated to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity, including the current financial obligation (ix) Total amount of the federal award committed to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity (x) Federal award project description, as required to be responsive to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) (xi) Name of federal awarding agency, pass-through entity, and contact information for awarding official of the pass-through entity (xii) Assistance Listing Numbers and title; the pass-through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each federal award and the Assistance Listing Numbers at time of disbursement (xiii) Identification of whether the award is R&D (xiv) Indirect cost rate for the federal award (including if the de minimis rate is charged) per ? 200.414 Condition - The CSLFRF subrecipient agreements did not include the CSLFRF assistance Listing Number (ALN), as required per 2 CFR 200.332 (a)(1)(xii). Questioned Costs - None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - During the fiscal year, the City passed through CSLFRF funding to three subrecipients. The agreements with the subrecipients included a reference to the applicable regulations provided by the Treasury and all the elements outlined under 2 CFR 200.331 (a)(1) with the exception of the ALN. Cause and Effect - The City?s controls did not ensure that the subrecipient agreements included all the required elements, as outlined under 2 CFR 200.332 (a)(1). The lack of information could result in noncompliance by the subrecipient, as well as incorrect SEFA reporting. Recommendation - We recommend the City implement adequate controls to ensure subrecipient agreements included all the required elements, as outlined under 2 CFR 200.332 a)(1). Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - The City has implemented a process to ensure that all subrecipient agreements contain the federal ALN, as required by 2 CFR 200.332. All subrecipient agreements will include a new exhibit as an attachment in the agreement that will include the ALN and any other required grant elements.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 21.027, Department of Treasury, COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund (CSLFRF) Federal Award Identification Number and Year - N/A Pass-through Entity - N/A Finding Type - Significant deficiency and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - Per 2 CFR 200.332 (a), all pass-through entities must ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the following information at the time of the subaward and, if any of these data elements change, include the changes in subsequent subaward modification. When some of this information is not available, the pass-through entity must provide the best information available to describe the federal award and subaward. Required information includes the following: (1) Federal award identification (i) Subrecipient name (which must match the name associated with its unique entity identifier) (ii) Subrecipient's unique entity identifier (iii) Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN) (iv) Federal award date (see the definition of federal award date in ? 200.1 of this part) of award to the recipient by the federal agency (v) Subaward period of performance start and end date (vi) Subaward budget period start and end date (vii) Amount of federal funds obligated by this action by the pass-through entity to the subrecipient (viii) Total amount of federal funds obligated to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity, including the current financial obligation (ix) Total amount of the federal award committed to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity (x) Federal award project description, as required to be responsive to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) (xi) Name of federal awarding agency, pass-through entity, and contact information for awarding official of the pass-through entity (xii) Assistance Listing Numbers and title; the pass-through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each federal award and the Assistance Listing Numbers at time of disbursement (xiii) Identification of whether the award is R&D (xiv) Indirect cost rate for the federal award (including if the de minimis rate is charged) per ? 200.414 Condition - The CSLFRF subrecipient agreements did not include the CSLFRF assistance Listing Number (ALN), as required per 2 CFR 200.332 (a)(1)(xii). Questioned Costs - None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - During the fiscal year, the City passed through CSLFRF funding to three subrecipients. The agreements with the subrecipients included a reference to the applicable regulations provided by the Treasury and all the elements outlined under 2 CFR 200.331 (a)(1) with the exception of the ALN. Cause and Effect - The City?s controls did not ensure that the subrecipient agreements included all the required elements, as outlined under 2 CFR 200.332 (a)(1). The lack of information could result in noncompliance by the subrecipient, as well as incorrect SEFA reporting. Recommendation - We recommend the City implement adequate controls to ensure subrecipient agreements included all the required elements, as outlined under 2 CFR 200.332 a)(1). Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - The City has implemented a process to ensure that all subrecipient agreements contain the federal ALN, as required by 2 CFR 200.332. All subrecipient agreements will include a new exhibit as an attachment in the agreement that will include the ALN and any other required grant elements.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 21.027, Department of Treasury, COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund (CSLFRF) Federal Award Identification Number and Year - N/A Pass-through Entity - N/A Finding Type - Significant deficiency and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - Per 2 CFR 200.332 (a), all pass-through entities must ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the following information at the time of the subaward and, if any of these data elements change, include the changes in subsequent subaward modification. When some of this information is not available, the pass-through entity must provide the best information available to describe the federal award and subaward. Required information includes the following: (1) Federal award identification (i) Subrecipient name (which must match the name associated with its unique entity identifier) (ii) Subrecipient's unique entity identifier (iii) Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN) (iv) Federal award date (see the definition of federal award date in ? 200.1 of this part) of award to the recipient by the federal agency (v) Subaward period of performance start and end date (vi) Subaward budget period start and end date (vii) Amount of federal funds obligated by this action by the pass-through entity to the subrecipient (viii) Total amount of federal funds obligated to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity, including the current financial obligation (ix) Total amount of the federal award committed to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity (x) Federal award project description, as required to be responsive to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) (xi) Name of federal awarding agency, pass-through entity, and contact information for awarding official of the pass-through entity (xii) Assistance Listing Numbers and title; the pass-through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each federal award and the Assistance Listing Numbers at time of disbursement (xiii) Identification of whether the award is R&D (xiv) Indirect cost rate for the federal award (including if the de minimis rate is charged) per ? 200.414 Condition - The CSLFRF subrecipient agreements did not include the CSLFRF assistance Listing Number (ALN), as required per 2 CFR 200.332 (a)(1)(xii). Questioned Costs - None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - During the fiscal year, the City passed through CSLFRF funding to three subrecipients. The agreements with the subrecipients included a reference to the applicable regulations provided by the Treasury and all the elements outlined under 2 CFR 200.331 (a)(1) with the exception of the ALN. Cause and Effect - The City?s controls did not ensure that the subrecipient agreements included all the required elements, as outlined under 2 CFR 200.332 (a)(1). The lack of information could result in noncompliance by the subrecipient, as well as incorrect SEFA reporting. Recommendation - We recommend the City implement adequate controls to ensure subrecipient agreements included all the required elements, as outlined under 2 CFR 200.332 a)(1). Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - The City has implemented a process to ensure that all subrecipient agreements contain the federal ALN, as required by 2 CFR 200.332. All subrecipient agreements will include a new exhibit as an attachment in the agreement that will include the ALN and any other required grant elements.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 21.027, Department of Treasury, COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund (CSLFRF) Federal Award Identification Number and Year - N/A Pass-through Entity - N/A Finding Type - Significant deficiency and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - Per 2 CFR 200.332 (a), all pass-through entities must ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the following information at the time of the subaward and, if any of these data elements change, include the changes in subsequent subaward modification. When some of this information is not available, the pass-through entity must provide the best information available to describe the federal award and subaward. Required information includes the following: (1) Federal award identification (i) Subrecipient name (which must match the name associated with its unique entity identifier) (ii) Subrecipient's unique entity identifier (iii) Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN) (iv) Federal award date (see the definition of federal award date in ? 200.1 of this part) of award to the recipient by the federal agency (v) Subaward period of performance start and end date (vi) Subaward budget period start and end date (vii) Amount of federal funds obligated by this action by the pass-through entity to the subrecipient (viii) Total amount of federal funds obligated to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity, including the current financial obligation (ix) Total amount of the federal award committed to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity (x) Federal award project description, as required to be responsive to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) (xi) Name of federal awarding agency, pass-through entity, and contact information for awarding official of the pass-through entity (xii) Assistance Listing Numbers and title; the pass-through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each federal award and the Assistance Listing Numbers at time of disbursement (xiii) Identification of whether the award is R&D (xiv) Indirect cost rate for the federal award (including if the de minimis rate is charged) per ? 200.414 Condition - The CSLFRF subrecipient agreements did not include the CSLFRF assistance Listing Number (ALN), as required per 2 CFR 200.332 (a)(1)(xii). Questioned Costs - None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - During the fiscal year, the City passed through CSLFRF funding to three subrecipients. The agreements with the subrecipients included a reference to the applicable regulations provided by the Treasury and all the elements outlined under 2 CFR 200.331 (a)(1) with the exception of the ALN. Cause and Effect - The City?s controls did not ensure that the subrecipient agreements included all the required elements, as outlined under 2 CFR 200.332 (a)(1). The lack of information could result in noncompliance by the subrecipient, as well as incorrect SEFA reporting. Recommendation - We recommend the City implement adequate controls to ensure subrecipient agreements included all the required elements, as outlined under 2 CFR 200.332 a)(1). Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - The City has implemented a process to ensure that all subrecipient agreements contain the federal ALN, as required by 2 CFR 200.332. All subrecipient agreements will include a new exhibit as an attachment in the agreement that will include the ALN and any other required grant elements.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 21.027, Department of Treasury, COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund (CSLFRF) Federal Award Identification Number and Year - N/A Pass-through Entity - N/A Finding Type - Significant deficiency and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - Per 2 CFR 200.332 (a), all pass-through entities must ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the following information at the time of the subaward and, if any of these data elements change, include the changes in subsequent subaward modification. When some of this information is not available, the pass-through entity must provide the best information available to describe the federal award and subaward. Required information includes the following: (1) Federal award identification (i) Subrecipient name (which must match the name associated with its unique entity identifier) (ii) Subrecipient's unique entity identifier (iii) Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN) (iv) Federal award date (see the definition of federal award date in ? 200.1 of this part) of award to the recipient by the federal agency (v) Subaward period of performance start and end date (vi) Subaward budget period start and end date (vii) Amount of federal funds obligated by this action by the pass-through entity to the subrecipient (viii) Total amount of federal funds obligated to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity, including the current financial obligation (ix) Total amount of the federal award committed to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity (x) Federal award project description, as required to be responsive to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) (xi) Name of federal awarding agency, pass-through entity, and contact information for awarding official of the pass-through entity (xii) Assistance Listing Numbers and title; the pass-through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each federal award and the Assistance Listing Numbers at time of disbursement (xiii) Identification of whether the award is R&D (xiv) Indirect cost rate for the federal award (including if the de minimis rate is charged) per ? 200.414 Condition - The CSLFRF subrecipient agreements did not include the CSLFRF assistance Listing Number (ALN), as required per 2 CFR 200.332 (a)(1)(xii). Questioned Costs - None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - During the fiscal year, the City passed through CSLFRF funding to three subrecipients. The agreements with the subrecipients included a reference to the applicable regulations provided by the Treasury and all the elements outlined under 2 CFR 200.331 (a)(1) with the exception of the ALN. Cause and Effect - The City?s controls did not ensure that the subrecipient agreements included all the required elements, as outlined under 2 CFR 200.332 (a)(1). The lack of information could result in noncompliance by the subrecipient, as well as incorrect SEFA reporting. Recommendation - We recommend the City implement adequate controls to ensure subrecipient agreements included all the required elements, as outlined under 2 CFR 200.332 a)(1). Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - The City has implemented a process to ensure that all subrecipient agreements contain the federal ALN, as required by 2 CFR 200.332. All subrecipient agreements will include a new exhibit as an attachment in the agreement that will include the ALN and any other required grant elements.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 21.027, Department of Treasury, COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund (CSLFRF) Federal Award Identification Number and Year - N/A Pass-through Entity - N/A Finding Type - Significant deficiency and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - Per 2 CFR 200.332 (a), all pass-through entities must ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the following information at the time of the subaward and, if any of these data elements change, include the changes in subsequent subaward modification. When some of this information is not available, the pass-through entity must provide the best information available to describe the federal award and subaward. Required information includes the following: (1) Federal award identification (i) Subrecipient name (which must match the name associated with its unique entity identifier) (ii) Subrecipient's unique entity identifier (iii) Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN) (iv) Federal award date (see the definition of federal award date in ? 200.1 of this part) of award to the recipient by the federal agency (v) Subaward period of performance start and end date (vi) Subaward budget period start and end date (vii) Amount of federal funds obligated by this action by the pass-through entity to the subrecipient (viii) Total amount of federal funds obligated to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity, including the current financial obligation (ix) Total amount of the federal award committed to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity (x) Federal award project description, as required to be responsive to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) (xi) Name of federal awarding agency, pass-through entity, and contact information for awarding official of the pass-through entity (xii) Assistance Listing Numbers and title; the pass-through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each federal award and the Assistance Listing Numbers at time of disbursement (xiii) Identification of whether the award is R&D (xiv) Indirect cost rate for the federal award (including if the de minimis rate is charged) per ? 200.414 Condition - The CSLFRF subrecipient agreements did not include the CSLFRF assistance Listing Number (ALN), as required per 2 CFR 200.332 (a)(1)(xii). Questioned Costs - None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - During the fiscal year, the City passed through CSLFRF funding to three subrecipients. The agreements with the subrecipients included a reference to the applicable regulations provided by the Treasury and all the elements outlined under 2 CFR 200.331 (a)(1) with the exception of the ALN. Cause and Effect - The City?s controls did not ensure that the subrecipient agreements included all the required elements, as outlined under 2 CFR 200.332 (a)(1). The lack of information could result in noncompliance by the subrecipient, as well as incorrect SEFA reporting. Recommendation - We recommend the City implement adequate controls to ensure subrecipient agreements included all the required elements, as outlined under 2 CFR 200.332 a)(1). Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - The City has implemented a process to ensure that all subrecipient agreements contain the federal ALN, as required by 2 CFR 200.332. All subrecipient agreements will include a new exhibit as an attachment in the agreement that will include the ALN and any other required grant elements.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 21.027, Department of Treasury, COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund (CSLFRF) Federal Award Identification Number and Year - N/A Pass-through Entity - N/A Finding Type - Significant deficiency and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - Per 2 CFR 200.332 (a), all pass-through entities must ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the following information at the time of the subaward and, if any of these data elements change, include the changes in subsequent subaward modification. When some of this information is not available, the pass-through entity must provide the best information available to describe the federal award and subaward. Required information includes the following: (1) Federal award identification (i) Subrecipient name (which must match the name associated with its unique entity identifier) (ii) Subrecipient's unique entity identifier (iii) Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN) (iv) Federal award date (see the definition of federal award date in ? 200.1 of this part) of award to the recipient by the federal agency (v) Subaward period of performance start and end date (vi) Subaward budget period start and end date (vii) Amount of federal funds obligated by this action by the pass-through entity to the subrecipient (viii) Total amount of federal funds obligated to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity, including the current financial obligation (ix) Total amount of the federal award committed to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity (x) Federal award project description, as required to be responsive to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) (xi) Name of federal awarding agency, pass-through entity, and contact information for awarding official of the pass-through entity (xii) Assistance Listing Numbers and title; the pass-through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each federal award and the Assistance Listing Numbers at time of disbursement (xiii) Identification of whether the award is R&D (xiv) Indirect cost rate for the federal award (including if the de minimis rate is charged) per ? 200.414 Condition - The CSLFRF subrecipient agreements did not include the CSLFRF assistance Listing Number (ALN), as required per 2 CFR 200.332 (a)(1)(xii). Questioned Costs - None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - During the fiscal year, the City passed through CSLFRF funding to three subrecipients. The agreements with the subrecipients included a reference to the applicable regulations provided by the Treasury and all the elements outlined under 2 CFR 200.331 (a)(1) with the exception of the ALN. Cause and Effect - The City?s controls did not ensure that the subrecipient agreements included all the required elements, as outlined under 2 CFR 200.332 (a)(1). The lack of information could result in noncompliance by the subrecipient, as well as incorrect SEFA reporting. Recommendation - We recommend the City implement adequate controls to ensure subrecipient agreements included all the required elements, as outlined under 2 CFR 200.332 a)(1). Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - The City has implemented a process to ensure that all subrecipient agreements contain the federal ALN, as required by 2 CFR 200.332. All subrecipient agreements will include a new exhibit as an attachment in the agreement that will include the ALN and any other required grant elements.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 21.027, Department of Treasury, COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund (CSLFRF) Federal Award Identification Number and Year - N/A Pass-through Entity - N/A Finding Type - Significant deficiency and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - Per 2 CFR 200.332 (a), all pass-through entities must ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the following information at the time of the subaward and, if any of these data elements change, include the changes in subsequent subaward modification. When some of this information is not available, the pass-through entity must provide the best information available to describe the federal award and subaward. Required information includes the following: (1) Federal award identification (i) Subrecipient name (which must match the name associated with its unique entity identifier) (ii) Subrecipient's unique entity identifier (iii) Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN) (iv) Federal award date (see the definition of federal award date in ? 200.1 of this part) of award to the recipient by the federal agency (v) Subaward period of performance start and end date (vi) Subaward budget period start and end date (vii) Amount of federal funds obligated by this action by the pass-through entity to the subrecipient (viii) Total amount of federal funds obligated to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity, including the current financial obligation (ix) Total amount of the federal award committed to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity (x) Federal award project description, as required to be responsive to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) (xi) Name of federal awarding agency, pass-through entity, and contact information for awarding official of the pass-through entity (xii) Assistance Listing Numbers and title; the pass-through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each federal award and the Assistance Listing Numbers at time of disbursement (xiii) Identification of whether the award is R&D (xiv) Indirect cost rate for the federal award (including if the de minimis rate is charged) per ? 200.414 Condition - The CSLFRF subrecipient agreements did not include the CSLFRF assistance Listing Number (ALN), as required per 2 CFR 200.332 (a)(1)(xii). Questioned Costs - None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - During the fiscal year, the City passed through CSLFRF funding to three subrecipients. The agreements with the subrecipients included a reference to the applicable regulations provided by the Treasury and all the elements outlined under 2 CFR 200.331 (a)(1) with the exception of the ALN. Cause and Effect - The City?s controls did not ensure that the subrecipient agreements included all the required elements, as outlined under 2 CFR 200.332 (a)(1). The lack of information could result in noncompliance by the subrecipient, as well as incorrect SEFA reporting. Recommendation - We recommend the City implement adequate controls to ensure subrecipient agreements included all the required elements, as outlined under 2 CFR 200.332 a)(1). Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - The City has implemented a process to ensure that all subrecipient agreements contain the federal ALN, as required by 2 CFR 200.332. All subrecipient agreements will include a new exhibit as an attachment in the agreement that will include the ALN and any other required grant elements.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 21.027, Department of Treasury, COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund (CSLFRF) Federal Award Identification Number and Year - N/A Pass-through Entity - N/A Finding Type - Significant deficiency and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - Per 2 CFR 200.332 (a), all pass-through entities must ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the following information at the time of the subaward and, if any of these data elements change, include the changes in subsequent subaward modification. When some of this information is not available, the pass-through entity must provide the best information available to describe the federal award and subaward. Required information includes the following: (1) Federal award identification (i) Subrecipient name (which must match the name associated with its unique entity identifier) (ii) Subrecipient's unique entity identifier (iii) Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN) (iv) Federal award date (see the definition of federal award date in ? 200.1 of this part) of award to the recipient by the federal agency (v) Subaward period of performance start and end date (vi) Subaward budget period start and end date (vii) Amount of federal funds obligated by this action by the pass-through entity to the subrecipient (viii) Total amount of federal funds obligated to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity, including the current financial obligation (ix) Total amount of the federal award committed to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity (x) Federal award project description, as required to be responsive to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) (xi) Name of federal awarding agency, pass-through entity, and contact information for awarding official of the pass-through entity (xii) Assistance Listing Numbers and title; the pass-through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each federal award and the Assistance Listing Numbers at time of disbursement (xiii) Identification of whether the award is R&D (xiv) Indirect cost rate for the federal award (including if the de minimis rate is charged) per ? 200.414 Condition - The CSLFRF subrecipient agreements did not include the CSLFRF assistance Listing Number (ALN), as required per 2 CFR 200.332 (a)(1)(xii). Questioned Costs - None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - During the fiscal year, the City passed through CSLFRF funding to three subrecipients. The agreements with the subrecipients included a reference to the applicable regulations provided by the Treasury and all the elements outlined under 2 CFR 200.331 (a)(1) with the exception of the ALN. Cause and Effect - The City?s controls did not ensure that the subrecipient agreements included all the required elements, as outlined under 2 CFR 200.332 (a)(1). The lack of information could result in noncompliance by the subrecipient, as well as incorrect SEFA reporting. Recommendation - We recommend the City implement adequate controls to ensure subrecipient agreements included all the required elements, as outlined under 2 CFR 200.332 a)(1). Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - The City has implemented a process to ensure that all subrecipient agreements contain the federal ALN, as required by 2 CFR 200.332. All subrecipient agreements will include a new exhibit as an attachment in the agreement that will include the ALN and any other required grant elements.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 21.027, Department of Treasury, COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund (CSLFRF) Federal Award Identification Number and Year - N/A Pass-through Entity - N/A Finding Type - Significant deficiency and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - Per 2 CFR 200.332 (a), all pass-through entities must ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the following information at the time of the subaward and, if any of these data elements change, include the changes in subsequent subaward modification. When some of this information is not available, the pass-through entity must provide the best information available to describe the federal award and subaward. Required information includes the following: (1) Federal award identification (i) Subrecipient name (which must match the name associated with its unique entity identifier) (ii) Subrecipient's unique entity identifier (iii) Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN) (iv) Federal award date (see the definition of federal award date in ? 200.1 of this part) of award to the recipient by the federal agency (v) Subaward period of performance start and end date (vi) Subaward budget period start and end date (vii) Amount of federal funds obligated by this action by the pass-through entity to the subrecipient (viii) Total amount of federal funds obligated to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity, including the current financial obligation (ix) Total amount of the federal award committed to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity (x) Federal award project description, as required to be responsive to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) (xi) Name of federal awarding agency, pass-through entity, and contact information for awarding official of the pass-through entity (xii) Assistance Listing Numbers and title; the pass-through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each federal award and the Assistance Listing Numbers at time of disbursement (xiii) Identification of whether the award is R&D (xiv) Indirect cost rate for the federal award (including if the de minimis rate is charged) per ? 200.414 Condition - The CSLFRF subrecipient agreements did not include the CSLFRF assistance Listing Number (ALN), as required per 2 CFR 200.332 (a)(1)(xii). Questioned Costs - None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - During the fiscal year, the City passed through CSLFRF funding to three subrecipients. The agreements with the subrecipients included a reference to the applicable regulations provided by the Treasury and all the elements outlined under 2 CFR 200.331 (a)(1) with the exception of the ALN. Cause and Effect - The City?s controls did not ensure that the subrecipient agreements included all the required elements, as outlined under 2 CFR 200.332 (a)(1). The lack of information could result in noncompliance by the subrecipient, as well as incorrect SEFA reporting. Recommendation - We recommend the City implement adequate controls to ensure subrecipient agreements included all the required elements, as outlined under 2 CFR 200.332 a)(1). Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - The City has implemented a process to ensure that all subrecipient agreements contain the federal ALN, as required by 2 CFR 200.332. All subrecipient agreements will include a new exhibit as an attachment in the agreement that will include the ALN and any other required grant elements.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 21.027, Department of Treasury, COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund (CSLFRF) Federal Award Identification Number and Year - N/A Pass-through Entity - N/A Finding Type - Significant deficiency and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - Per 2 CFR 200.332 (a), all pass-through entities must ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the following information at the time of the subaward and, if any of these data elements change, include the changes in subsequent subaward modification. When some of this information is not available, the pass-through entity must provide the best information available to describe the federal award and subaward. Required information includes the following: (1) Federal award identification (i) Subrecipient name (which must match the name associated with its unique entity identifier) (ii) Subrecipient's unique entity identifier (iii) Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN) (iv) Federal award date (see the definition of federal award date in ? 200.1 of this part) of award to the recipient by the federal agency (v) Subaward period of performance start and end date (vi) Subaward budget period start and end date (vii) Amount of federal funds obligated by this action by the pass-through entity to the subrecipient (viii) Total amount of federal funds obligated to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity, including the current financial obligation (ix) Total amount of the federal award committed to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity (x) Federal award project description, as required to be responsive to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) (xi) Name of federal awarding agency, pass-through entity, and contact information for awarding official of the pass-through entity (xii) Assistance Listing Numbers and title; the pass-through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each federal award and the Assistance Listing Numbers at time of disbursement (xiii) Identification of whether the award is R&D (xiv) Indirect cost rate for the federal award (including if the de minimis rate is charged) per ? 200.414 Condition - The CSLFRF subrecipient agreements did not include the CSLFRF assistance Listing Number (ALN), as required per 2 CFR 200.332 (a)(1)(xii). Questioned Costs - None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - During the fiscal year, the City passed through CSLFRF funding to three subrecipients. The agreements with the subrecipients included a reference to the applicable regulations provided by the Treasury and all the elements outlined under 2 CFR 200.331 (a)(1) with the exception of the ALN. Cause and Effect - The City?s controls did not ensure that the subrecipient agreements included all the required elements, as outlined under 2 CFR 200.332 (a)(1). The lack of information could result in noncompliance by the subrecipient, as well as incorrect SEFA reporting. Recommendation - We recommend the City implement adequate controls to ensure subrecipient agreements included all the required elements, as outlined under 2 CFR 200.332 a)(1). Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - The City has implemented a process to ensure that all subrecipient agreements contain the federal ALN, as required by 2 CFR 200.332. All subrecipient agreements will include a new exhibit as an attachment in the agreement that will include the ALN and any other required grant elements.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 21.027, Department of Treasury, COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund (CSLFRF) Federal Award Identification Number and Year - N/A Pass-through Entity - N/A Finding Type - Significant deficiency and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - Per 2 CFR 200.332 (a), all pass-through entities must ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the following information at the time of the subaward and, if any of these data elements change, include the changes in subsequent subaward modification. When some of this information is not available, the pass-through entity must provide the best information available to describe the federal award and subaward. Required information includes the following: (1) Federal award identification (i) Subrecipient name (which must match the name associated with its unique entity identifier) (ii) Subrecipient's unique entity identifier (iii) Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN) (iv) Federal award date (see the definition of federal award date in ? 200.1 of this part) of award to the recipient by the federal agency (v) Subaward period of performance start and end date (vi) Subaward budget period start and end date (vii) Amount of federal funds obligated by this action by the pass-through entity to the subrecipient (viii) Total amount of federal funds obligated to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity, including the current financial obligation (ix) Total amount of the federal award committed to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity (x) Federal award project description, as required to be responsive to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) (xi) Name of federal awarding agency, pass-through entity, and contact information for awarding official of the pass-through entity (xii) Assistance Listing Numbers and title; the pass-through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each federal award and the Assistance Listing Numbers at time of disbursement (xiii) Identification of whether the award is R&D (xiv) Indirect cost rate for the federal award (including if the de minimis rate is charged) per ? 200.414 Condition - The CSLFRF subrecipient agreements did not include the CSLFRF assistance Listing Number (ALN), as required per 2 CFR 200.332 (a)(1)(xii). Questioned Costs - None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - During the fiscal year, the City passed through CSLFRF funding to three subrecipients. The agreements with the subrecipients included a reference to the applicable regulations provided by the Treasury and all the elements outlined under 2 CFR 200.331 (a)(1) with the exception of the ALN. Cause and Effect - The City?s controls did not ensure that the subrecipient agreements included all the required elements, as outlined under 2 CFR 200.332 (a)(1). The lack of information could result in noncompliance by the subrecipient, as well as incorrect SEFA reporting. Recommendation - We recommend the City implement adequate controls to ensure subrecipient agreements included all the required elements, as outlined under 2 CFR 200.332 a)(1). Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - The City has implemented a process to ensure that all subrecipient agreements contain the federal ALN, as required by 2 CFR 200.332. All subrecipient agreements will include a new exhibit as an attachment in the agreement that will include the ALN and any other required grant elements.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 21.027, Department of Treasury, COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund (CSLFRF) Federal Award Identification Number and Year - N/A Pass-through Entity - N/A Finding Type - Significant deficiency and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - Per 2 CFR 200.332 (a), all pass-through entities must ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the following information at the time of the subaward and, if any of these data elements change, include the changes in subsequent subaward modification. When some of this information is not available, the pass-through entity must provide the best information available to describe the federal award and subaward. Required information includes the following: (1) Federal award identification (i) Subrecipient name (which must match the name associated with its unique entity identifier) (ii) Subrecipient's unique entity identifier (iii) Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN) (iv) Federal award date (see the definition of federal award date in ? 200.1 of this part) of award to the recipient by the federal agency (v) Subaward period of performance start and end date (vi) Subaward budget period start and end date (vii) Amount of federal funds obligated by this action by the pass-through entity to the subrecipient (viii) Total amount of federal funds obligated to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity, including the current financial obligation (ix) Total amount of the federal award committed to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity (x) Federal award project description, as required to be responsive to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) (xi) Name of federal awarding agency, pass-through entity, and contact information for awarding official of the pass-through entity (xii) Assistance Listing Numbers and title; the pass-through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each federal award and the Assistance Listing Numbers at time of disbursement (xiii) Identification of whether the award is R&D (xiv) Indirect cost rate for the federal award (including if the de minimis rate is charged) per ? 200.414 Condition - The CSLFRF subrecipient agreements did not include the CSLFRF assistance Listing Number (ALN), as required per 2 CFR 200.332 (a)(1)(xii). Questioned Costs - None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - During the fiscal year, the City passed through CSLFRF funding to three subrecipients. The agreements with the subrecipients included a reference to the applicable regulations provided by the Treasury and all the elements outlined under 2 CFR 200.331 (a)(1) with the exception of the ALN. Cause and Effect - The City?s controls did not ensure that the subrecipient agreements included all the required elements, as outlined under 2 CFR 200.332 (a)(1). The lack of information could result in noncompliance by the subrecipient, as well as incorrect SEFA reporting. Recommendation - We recommend the City implement adequate controls to ensure subrecipient agreements included all the required elements, as outlined under 2 CFR 200.332 a)(1). Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - The City has implemented a process to ensure that all subrecipient agreements contain the federal ALN, as required by 2 CFR 200.332. All subrecipient agreements will include a new exhibit as an attachment in the agreement that will include the ALN and any other required grant elements.
Program: Homeland Security Grant Program Federal Financial Assistance Listing Number: 97.067 Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Homeland Security Passed-Through: California Office of Emergency Services Award No. and Year: 2019-0035 and 2020; 2020-0095 and 2021 Program: Foster Care Federal Financial Assistance Listing Number: 93.658 Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Pass-Through: California Department of Social Services Award No. and Year: 2201CAFOST and 2022, 2101CAFOST and 2021 Compliance Requirements: Subrecipient Monitoring Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control and Instance of Noncompliance Criteria: 2 CFR Part 200.331(a), Requirements for Pass-Through Entities, states that all pass-through entities must ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes certain information as well as all the requirements imposed by the pass-through entity on the subrecipient so that the Federal award is used in accordance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition: The following information was not provided at the time of the subaward for two (2) of two (2) subawards selected for testing from the Homeland Security Grant Program within the Sheriff-Coroner department: ? Federal award identification number ? Identification of whether the award is research and development ? Indirect cost rate for the federal award The following information was not provided at the time of the subaward for seven (7) of eight (8) subawards selected for testing from the Social Services Agency?s (SSA) department for the Foster Care program: ? Subrecipient?s unique entity identifier ? Federal award identification number ? Federal award date of award to recipient by the Federal agency ? Subaward period of performance ? Amount of federal funds obligated to the subrecipient ? Amount of federal funds committed to the subrecipient ? Federal award project description ? Name of federal awarding agency ? CFDA number ? Identification of whether the award is research and development ? Indirect cost rate Cause: The Sheriff-Coroner and SSA departments procedures did not consistently ensure that the required award information and applicable requirements were communicated to subrecipients. Effect: The Sheriff-Coroner and SSA departments did not identify the required elements of the subaward to the subrecipients at the time of the subaward, increasing the risk of noncompliance. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs were identified as a result of our procedures. Context/Sampling: The entire population of two (2) subrecipients were selected for subrecipient monitoring testing for HSGP ? Sheriff-Coroner department. A non-statistical sample of eight (8) of fifty-three (53) subrecipients were selected for subrecipient monitoring testing for the Foster Care program ? SSA. Repeat Finding from Prior Years: No. Recommendation: We recommend that the Sheriff-Coroner and SSA departments modify and strengthen its current policies and procedures to ensure that all required award information and applicable requirements are communicated to subrecipients at the time of subaward in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.331(a). Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees. See separately issued Corrective Action Plan.
Program: Homeland Security Grant Program Federal Financial Assistance Listing Number: 97.067 Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Homeland Security Passed-Through: California Office of Emergency Services Award No. and Year: 2019-0035 and 2020; 2020-0095 and 2021 Program: Foster Care Federal Financial Assistance Listing Number: 93.658 Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Pass-Through: California Department of Social Services Award No. and Year: 2201CAFOST and 2022, 2101CAFOST and 2021 Compliance Requirements: Subrecipient Monitoring Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control and Instance of Noncompliance Criteria: 2 CFR Part 200.331(a), Requirements for Pass-Through Entities, states that all pass-through entities must ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes certain information as well as all the requirements imposed by the pass-through entity on the subrecipient so that the Federal award is used in accordance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition: The following information was not provided at the time of the subaward for two (2) of two (2) subawards selected for testing from the Homeland Security Grant Program within the Sheriff-Coroner department: ? Federal award identification number ? Identification of whether the award is research and development ? Indirect cost rate for the federal award The following information was not provided at the time of the subaward for seven (7) of eight (8) subawards selected for testing from the Social Services Agency?s (SSA) department for the Foster Care program: ? Subrecipient?s unique entity identifier ? Federal award identification number ? Federal award date of award to recipient by the Federal agency ? Subaward period of performance ? Amount of federal funds obligated to the subrecipient ? Amount of federal funds committed to the subrecipient ? Federal award project description ? Name of federal awarding agency ? CFDA number ? Identification of whether the award is research and development ? Indirect cost rate Cause: The Sheriff-Coroner and SSA departments procedures did not consistently ensure that the required award information and applicable requirements were communicated to subrecipients. Effect: The Sheriff-Coroner and SSA departments did not identify the required elements of the subaward to the subrecipients at the time of the subaward, increasing the risk of noncompliance. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs were identified as a result of our procedures. Context/Sampling: The entire population of two (2) subrecipients were selected for subrecipient monitoring testing for HSGP ? Sheriff-Coroner department. A non-statistical sample of eight (8) of fifty-three (53) subrecipients were selected for subrecipient monitoring testing for the Foster Care program ? SSA. Repeat Finding from Prior Years: No. Recommendation: We recommend that the Sheriff-Coroner and SSA departments modify and strengthen its current policies and procedures to ensure that all required award information and applicable requirements are communicated to subrecipients at the time of subaward in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.331(a). Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees. See separately issued Corrective Action Plan.
Program: Homeland Security Grant Program Federal Financial Assistance Listing Number: 97.067 Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Homeland Security Passed-Through: California Office of Emergency Services Award No. and Year: 2019-0035 and 2020; 2020-0095 and 2021 Program: Foster Care Federal Financial Assistance Listing Number: 93.658 Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Pass-Through: California Department of Social Services Award No. and Year: 2201CAFOST and 2022, 2101CAFOST and 2021 Compliance Requirements: Subrecipient Monitoring Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control and Instance of Noncompliance Criteria: 2 CFR Part 200.331(a), Requirements for Pass-Through Entities, states that all pass-through entities must ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes certain information as well as all the requirements imposed by the pass-through entity on the subrecipient so that the Federal award is used in accordance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition: The following information was not provided at the time of the subaward for two (2) of two (2) subawards selected for testing from the Homeland Security Grant Program within the Sheriff-Coroner department: ? Federal award identification number ? Identification of whether the award is research and development ? Indirect cost rate for the federal award The following information was not provided at the time of the subaward for seven (7) of eight (8) subawards selected for testing from the Social Services Agency?s (SSA) department for the Foster Care program: ? Subrecipient?s unique entity identifier ? Federal award identification number ? Federal award date of award to recipient by the Federal agency ? Subaward period of performance ? Amount of federal funds obligated to the subrecipient ? Amount of federal funds committed to the subrecipient ? Federal award project description ? Name of federal awarding agency ? CFDA number ? Identification of whether the award is research and development ? Indirect cost rate Cause: The Sheriff-Coroner and SSA departments procedures did not consistently ensure that the required award information and applicable requirements were communicated to subrecipients. Effect: The Sheriff-Coroner and SSA departments did not identify the required elements of the subaward to the subrecipients at the time of the subaward, increasing the risk of noncompliance. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs were identified as a result of our procedures. Context/Sampling: The entire population of two (2) subrecipients were selected for subrecipient monitoring testing for HSGP ? Sheriff-Coroner department. A non-statistical sample of eight (8) of fifty-three (53) subrecipients were selected for subrecipient monitoring testing for the Foster Care program ? SSA. Repeat Finding from Prior Years: No. Recommendation: We recommend that the Sheriff-Coroner and SSA departments modify and strengthen its current policies and procedures to ensure that all required award information and applicable requirements are communicated to subrecipients at the time of subaward in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.331(a). Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees. See separately issued Corrective Action Plan.
Program: Homeland Security Grant Program Federal Financial Assistance Listing Number: 97.067 Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Homeland Security Passed-Through: California Office of Emergency Services Award No. and Year: 2019-0035 and 2020; 2020-0095 and 2021 Program: Foster Care Federal Financial Assistance Listing Number: 93.658 Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Pass-Through: California Department of Social Services Award No. and Year: 2201CAFOST and 2022, 2101CAFOST and 2021 Compliance Requirements: Subrecipient Monitoring Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control and Instance of Noncompliance Criteria: 2 CFR Part 200.331(a), Requirements for Pass-Through Entities, states that all pass-through entities must ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes certain information as well as all the requirements imposed by the pass-through entity on the subrecipient so that the Federal award is used in accordance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition: The following information was not provided at the time of the subaward for two (2) of two (2) subawards selected for testing from the Homeland Security Grant Program within the Sheriff-Coroner department: ? Federal award identification number ? Identification of whether the award is research and development ? Indirect cost rate for the federal award The following information was not provided at the time of the subaward for seven (7) of eight (8) subawards selected for testing from the Social Services Agency?s (SSA) department for the Foster Care program: ? Subrecipient?s unique entity identifier ? Federal award identification number ? Federal award date of award to recipient by the Federal agency ? Subaward period of performance ? Amount of federal funds obligated to the subrecipient ? Amount of federal funds committed to the subrecipient ? Federal award project description ? Name of federal awarding agency ? CFDA number ? Identification of whether the award is research and development ? Indirect cost rate Cause: The Sheriff-Coroner and SSA departments procedures did not consistently ensure that the required award information and applicable requirements were communicated to subrecipients. Effect: The Sheriff-Coroner and SSA departments did not identify the required elements of the subaward to the subrecipients at the time of the subaward, increasing the risk of noncompliance. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs were identified as a result of our procedures. Context/Sampling: The entire population of two (2) subrecipients were selected for subrecipient monitoring testing for HSGP ? Sheriff-Coroner department. A non-statistical sample of eight (8) of fifty-three (53) subrecipients were selected for subrecipient monitoring testing for the Foster Care program ? SSA. Repeat Finding from Prior Years: No. Recommendation: We recommend that the Sheriff-Coroner and SSA departments modify and strengthen its current policies and procedures to ensure that all required award information and applicable requirements are communicated to subrecipients at the time of subaward in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.331(a). Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees. See separately issued Corrective Action Plan.
Program: Homeland Security Grant Program Federal Financial Assistance Listing Number: 97.067 Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Homeland Security Passed-Through: California Office of Emergency Services Award No. and Year: 2019-0035 and 2020; 2020-0095 and 2021 Program: Foster Care Federal Financial Assistance Listing Number: 93.658 Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Pass-Through: California Department of Social Services Award No. and Year: 2201CAFOST and 2022, 2101CAFOST and 2021 Compliance Requirements: Subrecipient Monitoring Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control and Instance of Noncompliance Criteria: 2 CFR Part 200.331(a), Requirements for Pass-Through Entities, states that all pass-through entities must ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes certain information as well as all the requirements imposed by the pass-through entity on the subrecipient so that the Federal award is used in accordance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition: The following information was not provided at the time of the subaward for two (2) of two (2) subawards selected for testing from the Homeland Security Grant Program within the Sheriff-Coroner department: ? Federal award identification number ? Identification of whether the award is research and development ? Indirect cost rate for the federal award The following information was not provided at the time of the subaward for seven (7) of eight (8) subawards selected for testing from the Social Services Agency?s (SSA) department for the Foster Care program: ? Subrecipient?s unique entity identifier ? Federal award identification number ? Federal award date of award to recipient by the Federal agency ? Subaward period of performance ? Amount of federal funds obligated to the subrecipient ? Amount of federal funds committed to the subrecipient ? Federal award project description ? Name of federal awarding agency ? CFDA number ? Identification of whether the award is research and development ? Indirect cost rate Cause: The Sheriff-Coroner and SSA departments procedures did not consistently ensure that the required award information and applicable requirements were communicated to subrecipients. Effect: The Sheriff-Coroner and SSA departments did not identify the required elements of the subaward to the subrecipients at the time of the subaward, increasing the risk of noncompliance. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs were identified as a result of our procedures. Context/Sampling: The entire population of two (2) subrecipients were selected for subrecipient monitoring testing for HSGP ? Sheriff-Coroner department. A non-statistical sample of eight (8) of fifty-three (53) subrecipients were selected for subrecipient monitoring testing for the Foster Care program ? SSA. Repeat Finding from Prior Years: No. Recommendation: We recommend that the Sheriff-Coroner and SSA departments modify and strengthen its current policies and procedures to ensure that all required award information and applicable requirements are communicated to subrecipients at the time of subaward in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.331(a). Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees. See separately issued Corrective Action Plan.
Program: Homeland Security Grant Program Federal Financial Assistance Listing Number: 97.067 Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Homeland Security Passed-Through: California Office of Emergency Services Award No. and Year: 2019-0035 and 2020; 2020-0095 and 2021 Program: Foster Care Federal Financial Assistance Listing Number: 93.658 Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Pass-Through: California Department of Social Services Award No. and Year: 2201CAFOST and 2022, 2101CAFOST and 2021 Compliance Requirements: Subrecipient Monitoring Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control and Instance of Noncompliance Criteria: 2 CFR Part 200.331(a), Requirements for Pass-Through Entities, states that all pass-through entities must ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes certain information as well as all the requirements imposed by the pass-through entity on the subrecipient so that the Federal award is used in accordance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition: The following information was not provided at the time of the subaward for two (2) of two (2) subawards selected for testing from the Homeland Security Grant Program within the Sheriff-Coroner department: ? Federal award identification number ? Identification of whether the award is research and development ? Indirect cost rate for the federal award The following information was not provided at the time of the subaward for seven (7) of eight (8) subawards selected for testing from the Social Services Agency?s (SSA) department for the Foster Care program: ? Subrecipient?s unique entity identifier ? Federal award identification number ? Federal award date of award to recipient by the Federal agency ? Subaward period of performance ? Amount of federal funds obligated to the subrecipient ? Amount of federal funds committed to the subrecipient ? Federal award project description ? Name of federal awarding agency ? CFDA number ? Identification of whether the award is research and development ? Indirect cost rate Cause: The Sheriff-Coroner and SSA departments procedures did not consistently ensure that the required award information and applicable requirements were communicated to subrecipients. Effect: The Sheriff-Coroner and SSA departments did not identify the required elements of the subaward to the subrecipients at the time of the subaward, increasing the risk of noncompliance. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs were identified as a result of our procedures. Context/Sampling: The entire population of two (2) subrecipients were selected for subrecipient monitoring testing for HSGP ? Sheriff-Coroner department. A non-statistical sample of eight (8) of fifty-three (53) subrecipients were selected for subrecipient monitoring testing for the Foster Care program ? SSA. Repeat Finding from Prior Years: No. Recommendation: We recommend that the Sheriff-Coroner and SSA departments modify and strengthen its current policies and procedures to ensure that all required award information and applicable requirements are communicated to subrecipients at the time of subaward in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.331(a). Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees. See separately issued Corrective Action Plan.
Program: Homeland Security Grant Program Federal Financial Assistance Listing Number: 97.067 Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Homeland Security Passed-Through: California Office of Emergency Services Award No. and Year: 2019-0035 and 2020; 2020-0095 and 2021 Program: Foster Care Federal Financial Assistance Listing Number: 93.658 Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Pass-Through: California Department of Social Services Award No. and Year: 2201CAFOST and 2022, 2101CAFOST and 2021 Compliance Requirements: Subrecipient Monitoring Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control and Instance of Noncompliance Criteria: 2 CFR Part 200.331(a), Requirements for Pass-Through Entities, states that all pass-through entities must ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes certain information as well as all the requirements imposed by the pass-through entity on the subrecipient so that the Federal award is used in accordance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition: The following information was not provided at the time of the subaward for two (2) of two (2) subawards selected for testing from the Homeland Security Grant Program within the Sheriff-Coroner department: ? Federal award identification number ? Identification of whether the award is research and development ? Indirect cost rate for the federal award The following information was not provided at the time of the subaward for seven (7) of eight (8) subawards selected for testing from the Social Services Agency?s (SSA) department for the Foster Care program: ? Subrecipient?s unique entity identifier ? Federal award identification number ? Federal award date of award to recipient by the Federal agency ? Subaward period of performance ? Amount of federal funds obligated to the subrecipient ? Amount of federal funds committed to the subrecipient ? Federal award project description ? Name of federal awarding agency ? CFDA number ? Identification of whether the award is research and development ? Indirect cost rate Cause: The Sheriff-Coroner and SSA departments procedures did not consistently ensure that the required award information and applicable requirements were communicated to subrecipients. Effect: The Sheriff-Coroner and SSA departments did not identify the required elements of the subaward to the subrecipients at the time of the subaward, increasing the risk of noncompliance. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs were identified as a result of our procedures. Context/Sampling: The entire population of two (2) subrecipients were selected for subrecipient monitoring testing for HSGP ? Sheriff-Coroner department. A non-statistical sample of eight (8) of fifty-three (53) subrecipients were selected for subrecipient monitoring testing for the Foster Care program ? SSA. Repeat Finding from Prior Years: No. Recommendation: We recommend that the Sheriff-Coroner and SSA departments modify and strengthen its current policies and procedures to ensure that all required award information and applicable requirements are communicated to subrecipients at the time of subaward in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.331(a). Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees. See separately issued Corrective Action Plan.
Program: Homeland Security Grant Program Federal Financial Assistance Listing Number: 97.067 Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Homeland Security Passed-Through: California Office of Emergency Services Award No. and Year: 2019-0035 and 2020; 2020-0095 and 2021 Program: Foster Care Federal Financial Assistance Listing Number: 93.658 Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Pass-Through: California Department of Social Services Award No. and Year: 2201CAFOST and 2022, 2101CAFOST and 2021 Compliance Requirements: Subrecipient Monitoring Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control and Instance of Noncompliance Criteria: 2 CFR Part 200.331(a), Requirements for Pass-Through Entities, states that all pass-through entities must ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes certain information as well as all the requirements imposed by the pass-through entity on the subrecipient so that the Federal award is used in accordance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition: The following information was not provided at the time of the subaward for two (2) of two (2) subawards selected for testing from the Homeland Security Grant Program within the Sheriff-Coroner department: ? Federal award identification number ? Identification of whether the award is research and development ? Indirect cost rate for the federal award The following information was not provided at the time of the subaward for seven (7) of eight (8) subawards selected for testing from the Social Services Agency?s (SSA) department for the Foster Care program: ? Subrecipient?s unique entity identifier ? Federal award identification number ? Federal award date of award to recipient by the Federal agency ? Subaward period of performance ? Amount of federal funds obligated to the subrecipient ? Amount of federal funds committed to the subrecipient ? Federal award project description ? Name of federal awarding agency ? CFDA number ? Identification of whether the award is research and development ? Indirect cost rate Cause: The Sheriff-Coroner and SSA departments procedures did not consistently ensure that the required award information and applicable requirements were communicated to subrecipients. Effect: The Sheriff-Coroner and SSA departments did not identify the required elements of the subaward to the subrecipients at the time of the subaward, increasing the risk of noncompliance. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs were identified as a result of our procedures. Context/Sampling: The entire population of two (2) subrecipients were selected for subrecipient monitoring testing for HSGP ? Sheriff-Coroner department. A non-statistical sample of eight (8) of fifty-three (53) subrecipients were selected for subrecipient monitoring testing for the Foster Care program ? SSA. Repeat Finding from Prior Years: No. Recommendation: We recommend that the Sheriff-Coroner and SSA departments modify and strengthen its current policies and procedures to ensure that all required award information and applicable requirements are communicated to subrecipients at the time of subaward in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.331(a). Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees. See separately issued Corrective Action Plan.
Program: Homeland Security Grant Program Federal Financial Assistance Listing Number: 97.067 Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Homeland Security Passed-Through: California Office of Emergency Services Award No. and Year: 2019-0035 and 2020; 2020-0095 and 2021 Program: Foster Care Federal Financial Assistance Listing Number: 93.658 Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Pass-Through: California Department of Social Services Award No. and Year: 2201CAFOST and 2022, 2101CAFOST and 2021 Compliance Requirements: Subrecipient Monitoring Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control and Instance of Noncompliance Criteria: 2 CFR Part 200.331(a), Requirements for Pass-Through Entities, states that all pass-through entities must ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes certain information as well as all the requirements imposed by the pass-through entity on the subrecipient so that the Federal award is used in accordance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition: The following information was not provided at the time of the subaward for two (2) of two (2) subawards selected for testing from the Homeland Security Grant Program within the Sheriff-Coroner department: ? Federal award identification number ? Identification of whether the award is research and development ? Indirect cost rate for the federal award The following information was not provided at the time of the subaward for seven (7) of eight (8) subawards selected for testing from the Social Services Agency?s (SSA) department for the Foster Care program: ? Subrecipient?s unique entity identifier ? Federal award identification number ? Federal award date of award to recipient by the Federal agency ? Subaward period of performance ? Amount of federal funds obligated to the subrecipient ? Amount of federal funds committed to the subrecipient ? Federal award project description ? Name of federal awarding agency ? CFDA number ? Identification of whether the award is research and development ? Indirect cost rate Cause: The Sheriff-Coroner and SSA departments procedures did not consistently ensure that the required award information and applicable requirements were communicated to subrecipients. Effect: The Sheriff-Coroner and SSA departments did not identify the required elements of the subaward to the subrecipients at the time of the subaward, increasing the risk of noncompliance. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs were identified as a result of our procedures. Context/Sampling: The entire population of two (2) subrecipients were selected for subrecipient monitoring testing for HSGP ? Sheriff-Coroner department. A non-statistical sample of eight (8) of fifty-three (53) subrecipients were selected for subrecipient monitoring testing for the Foster Care program ? SSA. Repeat Finding from Prior Years: No. Recommendation: We recommend that the Sheriff-Coroner and SSA departments modify and strengthen its current policies and procedures to ensure that all required award information and applicable requirements are communicated to subrecipients at the time of subaward in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.331(a). Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees. See separately issued Corrective Action Plan.
Program: Homeland Security Grant Program Federal Financial Assistance Listing Number: 97.067 Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Homeland Security Passed-Through: California Office of Emergency Services Award No. and Year: 2019-0035 and 2020; 2020-0095 and 2021 Program: Foster Care Federal Financial Assistance Listing Number: 93.658 Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Pass-Through: California Department of Social Services Award No. and Year: 2201CAFOST and 2022, 2101CAFOST and 2021 Compliance Requirements: Subrecipient Monitoring Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control and Instance of Noncompliance Criteria: 2 CFR Part 200.331(a), Requirements for Pass-Through Entities, states that all pass-through entities must ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes certain information as well as all the requirements imposed by the pass-through entity on the subrecipient so that the Federal award is used in accordance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition: The following information was not provided at the time of the subaward for two (2) of two (2) subawards selected for testing from the Homeland Security Grant Program within the Sheriff-Coroner department: ? Federal award identification number ? Identification of whether the award is research and development ? Indirect cost rate for the federal award The following information was not provided at the time of the subaward for seven (7) of eight (8) subawards selected for testing from the Social Services Agency?s (SSA) department for the Foster Care program: ? Subrecipient?s unique entity identifier ? Federal award identification number ? Federal award date of award to recipient by the Federal agency ? Subaward period of performance ? Amount of federal funds obligated to the subrecipient ? Amount of federal funds committed to the subrecipient ? Federal award project description ? Name of federal awarding agency ? CFDA number ? Identification of whether the award is research and development ? Indirect cost rate Cause: The Sheriff-Coroner and SSA departments procedures did not consistently ensure that the required award information and applicable requirements were communicated to subrecipients. Effect: The Sheriff-Coroner and SSA departments did not identify the required elements of the subaward to the subrecipients at the time of the subaward, increasing the risk of noncompliance. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs were identified as a result of our procedures. Context/Sampling: The entire population of two (2) subrecipients were selected for subrecipient monitoring testing for HSGP ? Sheriff-Coroner department. A non-statistical sample of eight (8) of fifty-three (53) subrecipients were selected for subrecipient monitoring testing for the Foster Care program ? SSA. Repeat Finding from Prior Years: No. Recommendation: We recommend that the Sheriff-Coroner and SSA departments modify and strengthen its current policies and procedures to ensure that all required award information and applicable requirements are communicated to subrecipients at the time of subaward in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.331(a). Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees. See separately issued Corrective Action Plan.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 93.914, Department of Health and Human Services, HIV Emergency Relief Project Grants Federal Award Identification Number and Year - H89HA00021 29-01, H89HA00021-30-00 Pass-through Entity - N/A Finding Type - Significant deficiency Repeat Finding - No Criteria - Criteria Per 2 CFR 200.331 (b) Contractors. A contract is for the purpose of obtaining goods and services for the nonfederal entity's own use and creates a procurement relationship with the contractor. See the definition of contract in ? 200.1 of this part. Characteristics indicative of a procurement relationship between the nonfederal entity and a contractor are when the contractor: (1) Provides the goods and services within normal business operations (2) Provides similar goods or services to many different purchasers (3) Normally operates in a competitive environment (4) Provides goods or services that are ancillary to the operation of the Federal program (5) Is not subject to compliance requirements of the federal program as a result of the agreement, though similar requirements may apply for other reasons Condition - We noted that the City?s contractor was a party to the agreements with the City?s subrecipients. Based on the definition of a subaward as defined by Uniform Guidance (UG), a subaward is provided by a pass-through entity to a subrecipient for the subrecipient to carry out part of a federal award received by the pass-through entity. Further, a pass-through entity is defined as a nonfederal entity that provides a subaward to a subrecipient to carry out part of a federal program. A contractor is not a pass-through entity. Questioned Costs - None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - The City?s contractor selected the City?s 15 subrecipients and entered into a subaward agreement with each of them. In addition to the contractor?s signature, the City was also a signer of the agreement. It was noted that the City performed the monitoring of the 15 subrecipients as required by UG. Cause and Effect - The City?s relationship with the contractor changed recently from a fiduciary relationship to a contractor relationship, and certain responsibilities that were more in line with a subrecipient characteristic were retained in the contract. The City is responsible for evaluating agreements to assess whether a subrecipient or contractor relationship exists. The inclusion of programmatic decisions within an agreement could result in an inappropriate conclusion as to whether a subrecipient or contractor relationship exists and the City not performing appropriate oversight procedures. Recommendation - We recommend that the City review the contract and ensure that the scope of services excludes responsibilities that might apply to a subrecipient rather than a contractor and verify that adequate oversight controls are in place. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - The City will implement a process to ensure that its contractors do not enter into subrecipient agreements on behalf of the City. This will be monitored by ensuring that the contractors scope of work does not include solicitating and contracting with organizations as subrecipients. The City will issue its own Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA) application and directly enter into subrecipient agreements with qualified organizations.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 93.914, Department of Health and Human Services, HIV Emergency Relief Project Grants Federal Award Identification Number and Year - H89HA00021 29-01, H89HA00021-30-00 Pass-through Entity - N/A Finding Type - Significant deficiency Repeat Finding - No Criteria - Criteria Per 2 CFR 200.331 (b) Contractors. A contract is for the purpose of obtaining goods and services for the nonfederal entity's own use and creates a procurement relationship with the contractor. See the definition of contract in ? 200.1 of this part. Characteristics indicative of a procurement relationship between the nonfederal entity and a contractor are when the contractor: (1) Provides the goods and services within normal business operations (2) Provides similar goods or services to many different purchasers (3) Normally operates in a competitive environment (4) Provides goods or services that are ancillary to the operation of the Federal program (5) Is not subject to compliance requirements of the federal program as a result of the agreement, though similar requirements may apply for other reasons Condition - We noted that the City?s contractor was a party to the agreements with the City?s subrecipients. Based on the definition of a subaward as defined by Uniform Guidance (UG), a subaward is provided by a pass-through entity to a subrecipient for the subrecipient to carry out part of a federal award received by the pass-through entity. Further, a pass-through entity is defined as a nonfederal entity that provides a subaward to a subrecipient to carry out part of a federal program. A contractor is not a pass-through entity. Questioned Costs - None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - The City?s contractor selected the City?s 15 subrecipients and entered into a subaward agreement with each of them. In addition to the contractor?s signature, the City was also a signer of the agreement. It was noted that the City performed the monitoring of the 15 subrecipients as required by UG. Cause and Effect - The City?s relationship with the contractor changed recently from a fiduciary relationship to a contractor relationship, and certain responsibilities that were more in line with a subrecipient characteristic were retained in the contract. The City is responsible for evaluating agreements to assess whether a subrecipient or contractor relationship exists. The inclusion of programmatic decisions within an agreement could result in an inappropriate conclusion as to whether a subrecipient or contractor relationship exists and the City not performing appropriate oversight procedures. Recommendation - We recommend that the City review the contract and ensure that the scope of services excludes responsibilities that might apply to a subrecipient rather than a contractor and verify that adequate oversight controls are in place. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - The City will implement a process to ensure that its contractors do not enter into subrecipient agreements on behalf of the City. This will be monitored by ensuring that the contractors scope of work does not include solicitating and contracting with organizations as subrecipients. The City will issue its own Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA) application and directly enter into subrecipient agreements with qualified organizations.
FINDING 2022-010 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles, Period of Performance Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.173 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 21611-138-PN01, 21619-138-PN01, 22611-138-PN01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles, Period of Performance Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not designed nor implemented at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Activities Allowed or Unallowed, the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles, and the Period of Performance compliance requirements. The School Corporation had not established an effective system of internal controls to ensure that proper documentation was retained for audit. The School Corporation was unable to provide supporting documentation for one of the two journal entries tested. For the one journal entry, we were unable to determine if the Special Education fund transfers in, totaling $619,180, and transfers out, totaling $554,684, were for allowable activities and costs for the program. In addition, we were unable to determine if the transfers were for transactions that occurred within the period of performance. The lack of internal controls and the failure to retain supporting documentation was isolated to the transfers noted above. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal controls over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government" issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 40 SCOTT COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 2 SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 2 CFR 200.333 (Uniform Guidance) states in part: "Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal entity records pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report or, for Federal awards that are renewed quarterly or annually, from the date of the submission of the quarterly or annual financial report, respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass through entity in the case of a subrecipient. . . ." 2 CFR 200.334 (Revised Uniform Guidance) states in part: "Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal entity records pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report or, for Federal awards that are renewed quarterly or annually, from the date of the submission of the quarterly or annual financial report, respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity in the case of a subrecipient. . . ." 34 CFR 300.202(a) states: "General. Amounts provided to the LEA under Part B of the Act - (1) Must be expended in accordance with the applicable provisions of this part; (2) Must be used only to pay the excess costs of providing special education and related services to children with disabilities, consistent with paragraph (b) of this section; and (3) Must be used to supplement State, local, and other Federal funds and not to supplant those funds." 34 CFR 300.208 states: "(a) Uses. Notwithstanding ?? 300.202, 300.203(b), and 300.162(b), funds provided to an LEA under Part B of the Act may be used for the following activities: (1) Services and aids that also benefit nondisabled children. For the costs of special education and related services, and supplementary aids and services, provided in a regular class or other education-related setting to a child with a disability in accordance with the IEP of the child, even if one or more nondisabled children benefit from these services. (2) Early intervening services. To develop and implement coordinated, early intervening educational services in accordance with ? 300.226. (3) High cost special education and related services. To establish and implement cost or risk sharing funds, consortia, or cooperatives for the LEA itself, or for LEAs working in a consortium of which the LEA is a part, to pay for high cost special education and related services. (b) Administrative case management. An LEA may use funds received under Part B of the Act to purchase appropriate technology for recordkeeping, data collection, and related case management activities of teachers and related services personnel providing services described in the IEP of children with disabilities, that is needed for the implementation of those case management activities." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 41 SCOTT COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 2 SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 34 CFR 300.800 states: "The Secretary provides grants under section 619 of the Act to assist States to provide special education and related services in accordance with Part B of the Act ? (a) To children with disabilities aged three through five years; and (b) At a State's discretion, to two-year-old children with disabilities who will turn three during the school year." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 2 CFR 200.77 (Uniform Guidance) states: "Period of performance means the time during which the non-Federal entity may incur new obligations to carry out the work authorized under the Federal award. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity must include start and end dates of the period of performance in the Federal award (see ?? 200.210 Information contained in a Federal award paragraph (a)(5) and 200.331 Requirements for pass-through entities, paragraph (a)(1)(iv))." 2 CFR 200.1 (Revised Uniform Guidance) states in part: ". . . Period of performance means the total estimated time interval between the start of an initial Federal award and the planned end date, which may include one or more funded portions, or budget periods. Identification of the period of performance in the Federal award per ? 200.211(b)(5) does not commit the awarding agency to fund the award beyond the currently approved budget period. . . ." 2 CFR 200.309 (Uniform Guidance) states: "A non-Federal entity may charge to the Federal award only allowable costs incurred during the period of performance (except as described in ? 200.461 Publication and printing costs) and any costs incurred before the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity made the Federal award that were authorized by the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity." 2CFR 200.309 (Revised Uniform Guidance) states: "If a Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity approves an extension, or if a recipient extends under ? 200.308(e)(2), the Period of Performance will be amended to end at the completion of the extension. If a termination occurs, the Period of Performance will be amended to end upon the effective date of termination. If a renewal award is issued, a distinct Period of Performance will begin." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 42 SCOTT COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 2 SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Cause Management had not developed nor implemented a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance, or that supporting documentation would have been maintained and made available for audit, related to the grant agreement and the Activities Allowed or Unallowed, the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles, and the Period of Performance compliance requirements. Effect The failure to establish an effective system of internal controls and to retain and provide appropriate supporting documentation prevented the determination of the School Corporation's compliance with compliance requirements listed above. Questioned Costs Known questioned costs of $1,173,864 were identified, as detailed in Condition and Context. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure documentation will be maintained and made available for audit and comply with the grant agreement and the Activities Allowed or Unallowed, the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles, and the Period of Performance compliance requirements. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-010 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles, Period of Performance Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.173 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 21611-138-PN01, 21619-138-PN01, 22611-138-PN01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles, Period of Performance Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not designed nor implemented at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Activities Allowed or Unallowed, the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles, and the Period of Performance compliance requirements. The School Corporation had not established an effective system of internal controls to ensure that proper documentation was retained for audit. The School Corporation was unable to provide supporting documentation for one of the two journal entries tested. For the one journal entry, we were unable to determine if the Special Education fund transfers in, totaling $619,180, and transfers out, totaling $554,684, were for allowable activities and costs for the program. In addition, we were unable to determine if the transfers were for transactions that occurred within the period of performance. The lack of internal controls and the failure to retain supporting documentation was isolated to the transfers noted above. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal controls over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government" issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 40 SCOTT COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 2 SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 2 CFR 200.333 (Uniform Guidance) states in part: "Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal entity records pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report or, for Federal awards that are renewed quarterly or annually, from the date of the submission of the quarterly or annual financial report, respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass through entity in the case of a subrecipient. . . ." 2 CFR 200.334 (Revised Uniform Guidance) states in part: "Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal entity records pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report or, for Federal awards that are renewed quarterly or annually, from the date of the submission of the quarterly or annual financial report, respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity in the case of a subrecipient. . . ." 34 CFR 300.202(a) states: "General. Amounts provided to the LEA under Part B of the Act - (1) Must be expended in accordance with the applicable provisions of this part; (2) Must be used only to pay the excess costs of providing special education and related services to children with disabilities, consistent with paragraph (b) of this section; and (3) Must be used to supplement State, local, and other Federal funds and not to supplant those funds." 34 CFR 300.208 states: "(a) Uses. Notwithstanding ?? 300.202, 300.203(b), and 300.162(b), funds provided to an LEA under Part B of the Act may be used for the following activities: (1) Services and aids that also benefit nondisabled children. For the costs of special education and related services, and supplementary aids and services, provided in a regular class or other education-related setting to a child with a disability in accordance with the IEP of the child, even if one or more nondisabled children benefit from these services. (2) Early intervening services. To develop and implement coordinated, early intervening educational services in accordance with ? 300.226. (3) High cost special education and related services. To establish and implement cost or risk sharing funds, consortia, or cooperatives for the LEA itself, or for LEAs working in a consortium of which the LEA is a part, to pay for high cost special education and related services. (b) Administrative case management. An LEA may use funds received under Part B of the Act to purchase appropriate technology for recordkeeping, data collection, and related case management activities of teachers and related services personnel providing services described in the IEP of children with disabilities, that is needed for the implementation of those case management activities." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 41 SCOTT COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 2 SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 34 CFR 300.800 states: "The Secretary provides grants under section 619 of the Act to assist States to provide special education and related services in accordance with Part B of the Act ? (a) To children with disabilities aged three through five years; and (b) At a State's discretion, to two-year-old children with disabilities who will turn three during the school year." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 2 CFR 200.77 (Uniform Guidance) states: "Period of performance means the time during which the non-Federal entity may incur new obligations to carry out the work authorized under the Federal award. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity must include start and end dates of the period of performance in the Federal award (see ?? 200.210 Information contained in a Federal award paragraph (a)(5) and 200.331 Requirements for pass-through entities, paragraph (a)(1)(iv))." 2 CFR 200.1 (Revised Uniform Guidance) states in part: ". . . Period of performance means the total estimated time interval between the start of an initial Federal award and the planned end date, which may include one or more funded portions, or budget periods. Identification of the period of performance in the Federal award per ? 200.211(b)(5) does not commit the awarding agency to fund the award beyond the currently approved budget period. . . ." 2 CFR 200.309 (Uniform Guidance) states: "A non-Federal entity may charge to the Federal award only allowable costs incurred during the period of performance (except as described in ? 200.461 Publication and printing costs) and any costs incurred before the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity made the Federal award that were authorized by the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity." 2CFR 200.309 (Revised Uniform Guidance) states: "If a Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity approves an extension, or if a recipient extends under ? 200.308(e)(2), the Period of Performance will be amended to end at the completion of the extension. If a termination occurs, the Period of Performance will be amended to end upon the effective date of termination. If a renewal award is issued, a distinct Period of Performance will begin." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 42 SCOTT COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 2 SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Cause Management had not developed nor implemented a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance, or that supporting documentation would have been maintained and made available for audit, related to the grant agreement and the Activities Allowed or Unallowed, the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles, and the Period of Performance compliance requirements. Effect The failure to establish an effective system of internal controls and to retain and provide appropriate supporting documentation prevented the determination of the School Corporation's compliance with compliance requirements listed above. Questioned Costs Known questioned costs of $1,173,864 were identified, as detailed in Condition and Context. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure documentation will be maintained and made available for audit and comply with the grant agreement and the Activities Allowed or Unallowed, the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles, and the Period of Performance compliance requirements. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-010 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles, Period of Performance Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.173 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 21611-138-PN01, 21619-138-PN01, 22611-138-PN01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles, Period of Performance Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not designed nor implemented at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Activities Allowed or Unallowed, the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles, and the Period of Performance compliance requirements. The School Corporation had not established an effective system of internal controls to ensure that proper documentation was retained for audit. The School Corporation was unable to provide supporting documentation for one of the two journal entries tested. For the one journal entry, we were unable to determine if the Special Education fund transfers in, totaling $619,180, and transfers out, totaling $554,684, were for allowable activities and costs for the program. In addition, we were unable to determine if the transfers were for transactions that occurred within the period of performance. The lack of internal controls and the failure to retain supporting documentation was isolated to the transfers noted above. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal controls over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government" issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 40 SCOTT COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 2 SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 2 CFR 200.333 (Uniform Guidance) states in part: "Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal entity records pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report or, for Federal awards that are renewed quarterly or annually, from the date of the submission of the quarterly or annual financial report, respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass through entity in the case of a subrecipient. . . ." 2 CFR 200.334 (Revised Uniform Guidance) states in part: "Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal entity records pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report or, for Federal awards that are renewed quarterly or annually, from the date of the submission of the quarterly or annual financial report, respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity in the case of a subrecipient. . . ." 34 CFR 300.202(a) states: "General. Amounts provided to the LEA under Part B of the Act - (1) Must be expended in accordance with the applicable provisions of this part; (2) Must be used only to pay the excess costs of providing special education and related services to children with disabilities, consistent with paragraph (b) of this section; and (3) Must be used to supplement State, local, and other Federal funds and not to supplant those funds." 34 CFR 300.208 states: "(a) Uses. Notwithstanding ?? 300.202, 300.203(b), and 300.162(b), funds provided to an LEA under Part B of the Act may be used for the following activities: (1) Services and aids that also benefit nondisabled children. For the costs of special education and related services, and supplementary aids and services, provided in a regular class or other education-related setting to a child with a disability in accordance with the IEP of the child, even if one or more nondisabled children benefit from these services. (2) Early intervening services. To develop and implement coordinated, early intervening educational services in accordance with ? 300.226. (3) High cost special education and related services. To establish and implement cost or risk sharing funds, consortia, or cooperatives for the LEA itself, or for LEAs working in a consortium of which the LEA is a part, to pay for high cost special education and related services. (b) Administrative case management. An LEA may use funds received under Part B of the Act to purchase appropriate technology for recordkeeping, data collection, and related case management activities of teachers and related services personnel providing services described in the IEP of children with disabilities, that is needed for the implementation of those case management activities." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 41 SCOTT COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 2 SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 34 CFR 300.800 states: "The Secretary provides grants under section 619 of the Act to assist States to provide special education and related services in accordance with Part B of the Act ? (a) To children with disabilities aged three through five years; and (b) At a State's discretion, to two-year-old children with disabilities who will turn three during the school year." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 2 CFR 200.77 (Uniform Guidance) states: "Period of performance means the time during which the non-Federal entity may incur new obligations to carry out the work authorized under the Federal award. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity must include start and end dates of the period of performance in the Federal award (see ?? 200.210 Information contained in a Federal award paragraph (a)(5) and 200.331 Requirements for pass-through entities, paragraph (a)(1)(iv))." 2 CFR 200.1 (Revised Uniform Guidance) states in part: ". . . Period of performance means the total estimated time interval between the start of an initial Federal award and the planned end date, which may include one or more funded portions, or budget periods. Identification of the period of performance in the Federal award per ? 200.211(b)(5) does not commit the awarding agency to fund the award beyond the currently approved budget period. . . ." 2 CFR 200.309 (Uniform Guidance) states: "A non-Federal entity may charge to the Federal award only allowable costs incurred during the period of performance (except as described in ? 200.461 Publication and printing costs) and any costs incurred before the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity made the Federal award that were authorized by the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity." 2CFR 200.309 (Revised Uniform Guidance) states: "If a Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity approves an extension, or if a recipient extends under ? 200.308(e)(2), the Period of Performance will be amended to end at the completion of the extension. If a termination occurs, the Period of Performance will be amended to end upon the effective date of termination. If a renewal award is issued, a distinct Period of Performance will begin." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 42 SCOTT COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 2 SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Cause Management had not developed nor implemented a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance, or that supporting documentation would have been maintained and made available for audit, related to the grant agreement and the Activities Allowed or Unallowed, the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles, and the Period of Performance compliance requirements. Effect The failure to establish an effective system of internal controls and to retain and provide appropriate supporting documentation prevented the determination of the School Corporation's compliance with compliance requirements listed above. Questioned Costs Known questioned costs of $1,173,864 were identified, as detailed in Condition and Context. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure documentation will be maintained and made available for audit and comply with the grant agreement and the Activities Allowed or Unallowed, the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles, and the Period of Performance compliance requirements. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
Assistance Listings number and name: 97.024 Emergency Food and Shelter National Board Program Award number and year: 0727200-056, April 1, 2021 through September 30, 2022 Federal agency: Federal Emergency Management Agency Pass-through grantor: United Way Compliance requirement: Subrecipient monitoring Questioned costs: Unknown Condition?The County?s Grants Management and Innovation Department awarded $1.6 million to 1 of 2 subrecipients during the year, or 15 percent of the Department?s $10.6 million total program expenditures, but did not perform all the required monitoring activities of the subrecipient?s activities or compliance with the award terms and program requirements. Specifically, the Department performed insufficient monitoring during the year, which consisted only of reviewing and approving the subrecipient?s invoices of program expenditures for reimbursement. However, those monitoring procedures alone were not sufficient to evaluate whether the subrecipient used program monies in accordance with the award terms and program requirements. Effect?The Department?s lack of required monitoring increased the risk that the $1.6 million of program monies the Department awarded to this subrecipient may not have been spent in accordance with the award terms and program requirements. Cause?Department management reported that it had a previous contractor relationship with the subrecipient and had not reevaluated the substance of its federal award agreement with it, as required by federal regulation, to properly identify the need to implement subrecipient monitoring procedures. Criteria?Federal regulations require the County to evaluate the substance of its federal award agreements with other parties to determine whether each of the other parties receiving the monies have the role of a subrecipient or contractor and whether they are required to comply with any of the federal program?s requirements that the County should monitor (2 Code of Federal Regulation [CFR] ?200.331). Additionally, federal regulations require the County to monitor subrecipients, which includes required monitoring procedures for assessing the risk of each subrecipient?s noncompliance and monitoring activities based on those risk assessments; verifying single audits were conducted timely; following up on and ensuring corrective action is taken on audit findings that could potentially affect the program; and issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the federal award. Those federal regulations also provide that monitoring procedures may include reviewing financial and performance reports, providing training or technical assistance on program-related matters, and performing onsite reviews, selective audits, and/or other monitoring procedures (2 CFR ?200.332[b] and [d ? e]). Also, federal regulation requires establishing and maintaining effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the federal program is being managed in compliance with all applicable laws, regulations, and award terms (2 CFR ?200.303). Recommendations?The Department should: 1. Evaluate the substance of its federal award agreements with other parties to determine whether each of the other parties receiving the monies have the role of a subrecipient or contractor and whether they are required to comply with any of the federal program?s requirements that the Department should monitor. 2. Ensure it performs required monitoring of its subrecipients and their compliance with the award terms and program requirements by following its existing policies and procedures that require the Department to: a. Assess the risk of each subrecipient?s noncompliance and carry out monitoring activities based on those risk assessments such as reviewing financial and performance reports, providing training or technical assistance on program-related matters, and performing on-site reviews, selective audits, and/or other monitoring procedures. b. Verify subrecipients receive timely single audits, follow up on and ensure that corrective action is taken on any audit findings that could potentially affect the program, and issue management decisions for any audit findings pertaining to the federal award. c. Maintain documentation of monitoring procedures demonstrating they were performed, including the monitoring procedures? results and any County actions taken, if appropriate. The County?s corrective action plan at the end of this report includes the views and planned corrective action of its responsible officials. We are not required to audit and have not audited these responses and planned corrective actions and therefore provide no assurances as to their accuracy.
Finding 2022-066 Research and Development Cluster Subrecipient Monitoring Compliance Requirement The federal government sponsors research and development (R&D) activities under a variety of types of awards, most commonly grants, cooperative agreements, and contracts, to achieve objectives agreed upon between the federal awarding agency and the non-federal entity. The types of R&D conducted under these awards vary greatly. The objective of an individual project is explained in the federal award letter. R&D activities at the University are subject to federal subrecipient monitoring requirements. Under these requirements, the University is required to monitor its subrecipients to ensure they use funds in accordance with applicable laws, regulations and terms of the award. A subrecipient is defined in federal regulations [2 CFR 200.1] as ?an entity, usually but not limited to non-Federal entities, that receives a subaward from a pass-through entity to carry out part of a federal award; but does not include an individual that is a beneficiary of such award. A subrecipient may also be a recipient of other Federal awards directly from a federal awarding agency.? Federal regulations [2 CFR 200.1] define a subaward as an award provided by a pass-through entity, in this case the University, to an entity to carry out part of a Federal grant award received by the pass-through entity. As part of its subrecipient monitoring process, the University uses a subrecipient monitoring checklist that includes a variety of checkpoints, including whether an approved budget is in place and reviewed: whether the subrecipient had an audit, if applicable, and whether that audit has been reviewed; and whether a risk assessment related to a subrecipient?s potential noncompliance has been performed. During Fiscal Year 2022, the University?s three campuses in total expended approximately $916 million in R&D grant funds: $504 million, $406 million, and $6 million from the Boulder, Denver, and UCCS campuses, respectively. The University passed approximately $120 million to 1,325 subrecipients including other universities and non-profit organizations, to assist in the performance of a wide-range of projects such as research into learning disabilities or the advancement of scientific discovery, or other research related projects. What was the purpose of our audit work and what work was performed? The purpose of the audit work was to determine whether the University?s campuses had adequate internal controls in place over, and complied with, the R&D?s subrecipient monitoring requirements for Fiscal Year 2022. As part of our audit work, we tested 40 subrecipients to determine whether the University campuses? performed the subrecipient risk assessments related to a subrecipient?s potential noncompliance as required by federal regulations. How were the results of the audit work measured? We measured the results of our audit work against the following requirements: ? Federal regulation 2 CFR 200.331(b) requires that the University?s campuses, as federal grant recipients, must ?evaluate each subrecipient's risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring.? ? The Boulder campus? policy states that monitoring the subaward is a ?collaborative effort? made in both Central Administration as well as in the departments through the Principal Investigator and their supporting Department Administrator.? Completion of a risk analysis and the subrecipient monitoring checklist is listed among the responsibilities of the Central Office. What problem did the audit work identify? The Boulder campus did not perform a risk assessment for six out of the 40 subrecipients we tested (15 percent). However, the campus did perform other monitoring procedures over these subrecipients as the risk assessment process is one procedure in the overall subrecipient monitoring process. Why did this problem occur? The University did not have adequate internal controls in place for monitoring its subrecipients. Specifically, the University?s Boulder campus did not ensure that staff reviewed the subrecipient monitoring checklist in all instances to ensure all appropriate steps were completed, including risk assessments. University personnel indicated that proper staffing was not in place and specific monitoring of risk assessments was not being performed. Why does this problem matter? The University is obligated to adhere to specified requirements as outlined in federal regulations and the respective award agreement. By failing to adhere to the requirements for subrecipient monitoring, the University risks performing inadequate or inappropriate monitoring procedures and thereby increases the risk of subawards being used for unauthorized purposes. See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Recommendation 2022-066 The University of Colorado?s Boulder campus should strengthen its internal controls over, and ensure compliance with, federal subrecipient monitoring requirements for the Research and Development Cluster grant programs by enforcing required reviews of the subrecipient checklist for completeness to ensure all of the appropriate steps are completed, including risk assessments, and by ensuring that appropriate levels of staff are assigned responsibility for the reviews. Response University of Colorado Agree Implementation Date: November 2022 Management agrees with the recommendation. Due to hiring of new staff and an internal audit with similar findings, these actions were in process and implemented as of November 2022. These actions are part of the Sub Team?s standard operating processes and will continue. The proposed corrective action plan is as follows: ? The hiring of new team members in 2022; all team members trained on subcontracting processes and documentation requirements with an emphasis on following standard baseline procedures. ? New Subcontract Administrator (SCA) position tasked with compiling final packets for each sub, which includes a quality check to ensure all documents and signatures required are included. ? Use of subcontract checklist and risk assessments required and consistently done by the team.
Finding 2022-066 Research and Development Cluster Subrecipient Monitoring Compliance Requirement The federal government sponsors research and development (R&D) activities under a variety of types of awards, most commonly grants, cooperative agreements, and contracts, to achieve objectives agreed upon between the federal awarding agency and the non-federal entity. The types of R&D conducted under these awards vary greatly. The objective of an individual project is explained in the federal award letter. R&D activities at the University are subject to federal subrecipient monitoring requirements. Under these requirements, the University is required to monitor its subrecipients to ensure they use funds in accordance with applicable laws, regulations and terms of the award. A subrecipient is defined in federal regulations [2 CFR 200.1] as ?an entity, usually but not limited to non-Federal entities, that receives a subaward from a pass-through entity to carry out part of a federal award; but does not include an individual that is a beneficiary of such award. A subrecipient may also be a recipient of other Federal awards directly from a federal awarding agency.? Federal regulations [2 CFR 200.1] define a subaward as an award provided by a pass-through entity, in this case the University, to an entity to carry out part of a Federal grant award received by the pass-through entity. As part of its subrecipient monitoring process, the University uses a subrecipient monitoring checklist that includes a variety of checkpoints, including whether an approved budget is in place and reviewed: whether the subrecipient had an audit, if applicable, and whether that audit has been reviewed; and whether a risk assessment related to a subrecipient?s potential noncompliance has been performed. During Fiscal Year 2022, the University?s three campuses in total expended approximately $916 million in R&D grant funds: $504 million, $406 million, and $6 million from the Boulder, Denver, and UCCS campuses, respectively. The University passed approximately $120 million to 1,325 subrecipients including other universities and non-profit organizations, to assist in the performance of a wide-range of projects such as research into learning disabilities or the advancement of scientific discovery, or other research related projects. What was the purpose of our audit work and what work was performed? The purpose of the audit work was to determine whether the University?s campuses had adequate internal controls in place over, and complied with, the R&D?s subrecipient monitoring requirements for Fiscal Year 2022. As part of our audit work, we tested 40 subrecipients to determine whether the University campuses? performed the subrecipient risk assessments related to a subrecipient?s potential noncompliance as required by federal regulations. How were the results of the audit work measured? We measured the results of our audit work against the following requirements: ? Federal regulation 2 CFR 200.331(b) requires that the University?s campuses, as federal grant recipients, must ?evaluate each subrecipient's risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring.? ? The Boulder campus? policy states that monitoring the subaward is a ?collaborative effort? made in both Central Administration as well as in the departments through the Principal Investigator and their supporting Department Administrator.? Completion of a risk analysis and the subrecipient monitoring checklist is listed among the responsibilities of the Central Office. What problem did the audit work identify? The Boulder campus did not perform a risk assessment for six out of the 40 subrecipients we tested (15 percent). However, the campus did perform other monitoring procedures over these subrecipients as the risk assessment process is one procedure in the overall subrecipient monitoring process. Why did this problem occur? The University did not have adequate internal controls in place for monitoring its subrecipients. Specifically, the University?s Boulder campus did not ensure that staff reviewed the subrecipient monitoring checklist in all instances to ensure all appropriate steps were completed, including risk assessments. University personnel indicated that proper staffing was not in place and specific monitoring of risk assessments was not being performed. Why does this problem matter? The University is obligated to adhere to specified requirements as outlined in federal regulations and the respective award agreement. By failing to adhere to the requirements for subrecipient monitoring, the University risks performing inadequate or inappropriate monitoring procedures and thereby increases the risk of subawards being used for unauthorized purposes. See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Recommendation 2022-066 The University of Colorado?s Boulder campus should strengthen its internal controls over, and ensure compliance with, federal subrecipient monitoring requirements for the Research and Development Cluster grant programs by enforcing required reviews of the subrecipient checklist for completeness to ensure all of the appropriate steps are completed, including risk assessments, and by ensuring that appropriate levels of staff are assigned responsibility for the reviews. Response University of Colorado Agree Implementation Date: November 2022 Management agrees with the recommendation. Due to hiring of new staff and an internal audit with similar findings, these actions were in process and implemented as of November 2022. These actions are part of the Sub Team?s standard operating processes and will continue. The proposed corrective action plan is as follows: ? The hiring of new team members in 2022; all team members trained on subcontracting processes and documentation requirements with an emphasis on following standard baseline procedures. ? New Subcontract Administrator (SCA) position tasked with compiling final packets for each sub, which includes a quality check to ensure all documents and signatures required are included. ? Use of subcontract checklist and risk assessments required and consistently done by the team.
Finding 2022-066 Research and Development Cluster Subrecipient Monitoring Compliance Requirement The federal government sponsors research and development (R&D) activities under a variety of types of awards, most commonly grants, cooperative agreements, and contracts, to achieve objectives agreed upon between the federal awarding agency and the non-federal entity. The types of R&D conducted under these awards vary greatly. The objective of an individual project is explained in the federal award letter. R&D activities at the University are subject to federal subrecipient monitoring requirements. Under these requirements, the University is required to monitor its subrecipients to ensure they use funds in accordance with applicable laws, regulations and terms of the award. A subrecipient is defined in federal regulations [2 CFR 200.1] as ?an entity, usually but not limited to non-Federal entities, that receives a subaward from a pass-through entity to carry out part of a federal award; but does not include an individual that is a beneficiary of such award. A subrecipient may also be a recipient of other Federal awards directly from a federal awarding agency.? Federal regulations [2 CFR 200.1] define a subaward as an award provided by a pass-through entity, in this case the University, to an entity to carry out part of a Federal grant award received by the pass-through entity. As part of its subrecipient monitoring process, the University uses a subrecipient monitoring checklist that includes a variety of checkpoints, including whether an approved budget is in place and reviewed: whether the subrecipient had an audit, if applicable, and whether that audit has been reviewed; and whether a risk assessment related to a subrecipient?s potential noncompliance has been performed. During Fiscal Year 2022, the University?s three campuses in total expended approximately $916 million in R&D grant funds: $504 million, $406 million, and $6 million from the Boulder, Denver, and UCCS campuses, respectively. The University passed approximately $120 million to 1,325 subrecipients including other universities and non-profit organizations, to assist in the performance of a wide-range of projects such as research into learning disabilities or the advancement of scientific discovery, or other research related projects. What was the purpose of our audit work and what work was performed? The purpose of the audit work was to determine whether the University?s campuses had adequate internal controls in place over, and complied with, the R&D?s subrecipient monitoring requirements for Fiscal Year 2022. As part of our audit work, we tested 40 subrecipients to determine whether the University campuses? performed the subrecipient risk assessments related to a subrecipient?s potential noncompliance as required by federal regulations. How were the results of the audit work measured? We measured the results of our audit work against the following requirements: ? Federal regulation 2 CFR 200.331(b) requires that the University?s campuses, as federal grant recipients, must ?evaluate each subrecipient's risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring.? ? The Boulder campus? policy states that monitoring the subaward is a ?collaborative effort? made in both Central Administration as well as in the departments through the Principal Investigator and their supporting Department Administrator.? Completion of a risk analysis and the subrecipient monitoring checklist is listed among the responsibilities of the Central Office. What problem did the audit work identify? The Boulder campus did not perform a risk assessment for six out of the 40 subrecipients we tested (15 percent). However, the campus did perform other monitoring procedures over these subrecipients as the risk assessment process is one procedure in the overall subrecipient monitoring process. Why did this problem occur? The University did not have adequate internal controls in place for monitoring its subrecipients. Specifically, the University?s Boulder campus did not ensure that staff reviewed the subrecipient monitoring checklist in all instances to ensure all appropriate steps were completed, including risk assessments. University personnel indicated that proper staffing was not in place and specific monitoring of risk assessments was not being performed. Why does this problem matter? The University is obligated to adhere to specified requirements as outlined in federal regulations and the respective award agreement. By failing to adhere to the requirements for subrecipient monitoring, the University risks performing inadequate or inappropriate monitoring procedures and thereby increases the risk of subawards being used for unauthorized purposes. See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Recommendation 2022-066 The University of Colorado?s Boulder campus should strengthen its internal controls over, and ensure compliance with, federal subrecipient monitoring requirements for the Research and Development Cluster grant programs by enforcing required reviews of the subrecipient checklist for completeness to ensure all of the appropriate steps are completed, including risk assessments, and by ensuring that appropriate levels of staff are assigned responsibility for the reviews. Response University of Colorado Agree Implementation Date: November 2022 Management agrees with the recommendation. Due to hiring of new staff and an internal audit with similar findings, these actions were in process and implemented as of November 2022. These actions are part of the Sub Team?s standard operating processes and will continue. The proposed corrective action plan is as follows: ? The hiring of new team members in 2022; all team members trained on subcontracting processes and documentation requirements with an emphasis on following standard baseline procedures. ? New Subcontract Administrator (SCA) position tasked with compiling final packets for each sub, which includes a quality check to ensure all documents and signatures required are included. ? Use of subcontract checklist and risk assessments required and consistently done by the team.
Finding 2022-066 Research and Development Cluster Subrecipient Monitoring Compliance Requirement The federal government sponsors research and development (R&D) activities under a variety of types of awards, most commonly grants, cooperative agreements, and contracts, to achieve objectives agreed upon between the federal awarding agency and the non-federal entity. The types of R&D conducted under these awards vary greatly. The objective of an individual project is explained in the federal award letter. R&D activities at the University are subject to federal subrecipient monitoring requirements. Under these requirements, the University is required to monitor its subrecipients to ensure they use funds in accordance with applicable laws, regulations and terms of the award. A subrecipient is defined in federal regulations [2 CFR 200.1] as ?an entity, usually but not limited to non-Federal entities, that receives a subaward from a pass-through entity to carry out part of a federal award; but does not include an individual that is a beneficiary of such award. A subrecipient may also be a recipient of other Federal awards directly from a federal awarding agency.? Federal regulations [2 CFR 200.1] define a subaward as an award provided by a pass-through entity, in this case the University, to an entity to carry out part of a Federal grant award received by the pass-through entity. As part of its subrecipient monitoring process, the University uses a subrecipient monitoring checklist that includes a variety of checkpoints, including whether an approved budget is in place and reviewed: whether the subrecipient had an audit, if applicable, and whether that audit has been reviewed; and whether a risk assessment related to a subrecipient?s potential noncompliance has been performed. During Fiscal Year 2022, the University?s three campuses in total expended approximately $916 million in R&D grant funds: $504 million, $406 million, and $6 million from the Boulder, Denver, and UCCS campuses, respectively. The University passed approximately $120 million to 1,325 subrecipients including other universities and non-profit organizations, to assist in the performance of a wide-range of projects such as research into learning disabilities or the advancement of scientific discovery, or other research related projects. What was the purpose of our audit work and what work was performed? The purpose of the audit work was to determine whether the University?s campuses had adequate internal controls in place over, and complied with, the R&D?s subrecipient monitoring requirements for Fiscal Year 2022. As part of our audit work, we tested 40 subrecipients to determine whether the University campuses? performed the subrecipient risk assessments related to a subrecipient?s potential noncompliance as required by federal regulations. How were the results of the audit work measured? We measured the results of our audit work against the following requirements: ? Federal regulation 2 CFR 200.331(b) requires that the University?s campuses, as federal grant recipients, must ?evaluate each subrecipient's risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring.? ? The Boulder campus? policy states that monitoring the subaward is a ?collaborative effort? made in both Central Administration as well as in the departments through the Principal Investigator and their supporting Department Administrator.? Completion of a risk analysis and the subrecipient monitoring checklist is listed among the responsibilities of the Central Office. What problem did the audit work identify? The Boulder campus did not perform a risk assessment for six out of the 40 subrecipients we tested (15 percent). However, the campus did perform other monitoring procedures over these subrecipients as the risk assessment process is one procedure in the overall subrecipient monitoring process. Why did this problem occur? The University did not have adequate internal controls in place for monitoring its subrecipients. Specifically, the University?s Boulder campus did not ensure that staff reviewed the subrecipient monitoring checklist in all instances to ensure all appropriate steps were completed, including risk assessments. University personnel indicated that proper staffing was not in place and specific monitoring of risk assessments was not being performed. Why does this problem matter? The University is obligated to adhere to specified requirements as outlined in federal regulations and the respective award agreement. By failing to adhere to the requirements for subrecipient monitoring, the University risks performing inadequate or inappropriate monitoring procedures and thereby increases the risk of subawards being used for unauthorized purposes. See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Recommendation 2022-066 The University of Colorado?s Boulder campus should strengthen its internal controls over, and ensure compliance with, federal subrecipient monitoring requirements for the Research and Development Cluster grant programs by enforcing required reviews of the subrecipient checklist for completeness to ensure all of the appropriate steps are completed, including risk assessments, and by ensuring that appropriate levels of staff are assigned responsibility for the reviews. Response University of Colorado Agree Implementation Date: November 2022 Management agrees with the recommendation. Due to hiring of new staff and an internal audit with similar findings, these actions were in process and implemented as of November 2022. These actions are part of the Sub Team?s standard operating processes and will continue. The proposed corrective action plan is as follows: ? The hiring of new team members in 2022; all team members trained on subcontracting processes and documentation requirements with an emphasis on following standard baseline procedures. ? New Subcontract Administrator (SCA) position tasked with compiling final packets for each sub, which includes a quality check to ensure all documents and signatures required are included. ? Use of subcontract checklist and risk assessments required and consistently done by the team.
Finding 2022-066 Research and Development Cluster Subrecipient Monitoring Compliance Requirement The federal government sponsors research and development (R&D) activities under a variety of types of awards, most commonly grants, cooperative agreements, and contracts, to achieve objectives agreed upon between the federal awarding agency and the non-federal entity. The types of R&D conducted under these awards vary greatly. The objective of an individual project is explained in the federal award letter. R&D activities at the University are subject to federal subrecipient monitoring requirements. Under these requirements, the University is required to monitor its subrecipients to ensure they use funds in accordance with applicable laws, regulations and terms of the award. A subrecipient is defined in federal regulations [2 CFR 200.1] as ?an entity, usually but not limited to non-Federal entities, that receives a subaward from a pass-through entity to carry out part of a federal award; but does not include an individual that is a beneficiary of such award. A subrecipient may also be a recipient of other Federal awards directly from a federal awarding agency.? Federal regulations [2 CFR 200.1] define a subaward as an award provided by a pass-through entity, in this case the University, to an entity to carry out part of a Federal grant award received by the pass-through entity. As part of its subrecipient monitoring process, the University uses a subrecipient monitoring checklist that includes a variety of checkpoints, including whether an approved budget is in place and reviewed: whether the subrecipient had an audit, if applicable, and whether that audit has been reviewed; and whether a risk assessment related to a subrecipient?s potential noncompliance has been performed. During Fiscal Year 2022, the University?s three campuses in total expended approximately $916 million in R&D grant funds: $504 million, $406 million, and $6 million from the Boulder, Denver, and UCCS campuses, respectively. The University passed approximately $120 million to 1,325 subrecipients including other universities and non-profit organizations, to assist in the performance of a wide-range of projects such as research into learning disabilities or the advancement of scientific discovery, or other research related projects. What was the purpose of our audit work and what work was performed? The purpose of the audit work was to determine whether the University?s campuses had adequate internal controls in place over, and complied with, the R&D?s subrecipient monitoring requirements for Fiscal Year 2022. As part of our audit work, we tested 40 subrecipients to determine whether the University campuses? performed the subrecipient risk assessments related to a subrecipient?s potential noncompliance as required by federal regulations. How were the results of the audit work measured? We measured the results of our audit work against the following requirements: ? Federal regulation 2 CFR 200.331(b) requires that the University?s campuses, as federal grant recipients, must ?evaluate each subrecipient's risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring.? ? The Boulder campus? policy states that monitoring the subaward is a ?collaborative effort? made in both Central Administration as well as in the departments through the Principal Investigator and their supporting Department Administrator.? Completion of a risk analysis and the subrecipient monitoring checklist is listed among the responsibilities of the Central Office. What problem did the audit work identify? The Boulder campus did not perform a risk assessment for six out of the 40 subrecipients we tested (15 percent). However, the campus did perform other monitoring procedures over these subrecipients as the risk assessment process is one procedure in the overall subrecipient monitoring process. Why did this problem occur? The University did not have adequate internal controls in place for monitoring its subrecipients. Specifically, the University?s Boulder campus did not ensure that staff reviewed the subrecipient monitoring checklist in all instances to ensure all appropriate steps were completed, including risk assessments. University personnel indicated that proper staffing was not in place and specific monitoring of risk assessments was not being performed. Why does this problem matter? The University is obligated to adhere to specified requirements as outlined in federal regulations and the respective award agreement. By failing to adhere to the requirements for subrecipient monitoring, the University risks performing inadequate or inappropriate monitoring procedures and thereby increases the risk of subawards being used for unauthorized purposes. See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Recommendation 2022-066 The University of Colorado?s Boulder campus should strengthen its internal controls over, and ensure compliance with, federal subrecipient monitoring requirements for the Research and Development Cluster grant programs by enforcing required reviews of the subrecipient checklist for completeness to ensure all of the appropriate steps are completed, including risk assessments, and by ensuring that appropriate levels of staff are assigned responsibility for the reviews. Response University of Colorado Agree Implementation Date: November 2022 Management agrees with the recommendation. Due to hiring of new staff and an internal audit with similar findings, these actions were in process and implemented as of November 2022. These actions are part of the Sub Team?s standard operating processes and will continue. The proposed corrective action plan is as follows: ? The hiring of new team members in 2022; all team members trained on subcontracting processes and documentation requirements with an emphasis on following standard baseline procedures. ? New Subcontract Administrator (SCA) position tasked with compiling final packets for each sub, which includes a quality check to ensure all documents and signatures required are included. ? Use of subcontract checklist and risk assessments required and consistently done by the team.
Finding 2022-066 Research and Development Cluster Subrecipient Monitoring Compliance Requirement The federal government sponsors research and development (R&D) activities under a variety of types of awards, most commonly grants, cooperative agreements, and contracts, to achieve objectives agreed upon between the federal awarding agency and the non-federal entity. The types of R&D conducted under these awards vary greatly. The objective of an individual project is explained in the federal award letter. R&D activities at the University are subject to federal subrecipient monitoring requirements. Under these requirements, the University is required to monitor its subrecipients to ensure they use funds in accordance with applicable laws, regulations and terms of the award. A subrecipient is defined in federal regulations [2 CFR 200.1] as ?an entity, usually but not limited to non-Federal entities, that receives a subaward from a pass-through entity to carry out part of a federal award; but does not include an individual that is a beneficiary of such award. A subrecipient may also be a recipient of other Federal awards directly from a federal awarding agency.? Federal regulations [2 CFR 200.1] define a subaward as an award provided by a pass-through entity, in this case the University, to an entity to carry out part of a Federal grant award received by the pass-through entity. As part of its subrecipient monitoring process, the University uses a subrecipient monitoring checklist that includes a variety of checkpoints, including whether an approved budget is in place and reviewed: whether the subrecipient had an audit, if applicable, and whether that audit has been reviewed; and whether a risk assessment related to a subrecipient?s potential noncompliance has been performed. During Fiscal Year 2022, the University?s three campuses in total expended approximately $916 million in R&D grant funds: $504 million, $406 million, and $6 million from the Boulder, Denver, and UCCS campuses, respectively. The University passed approximately $120 million to 1,325 subrecipients including other universities and non-profit organizations, to assist in the performance of a wide-range of projects such as research into learning disabilities or the advancement of scientific discovery, or other research related projects. What was the purpose of our audit work and what work was performed? The purpose of the audit work was to determine whether the University?s campuses had adequate internal controls in place over, and complied with, the R&D?s subrecipient monitoring requirements for Fiscal Year 2022. As part of our audit work, we tested 40 subrecipients to determine whether the University campuses? performed the subrecipient risk assessments related to a subrecipient?s potential noncompliance as required by federal regulations. How were the results of the audit work measured? We measured the results of our audit work against the following requirements: ? Federal regulation 2 CFR 200.331(b) requires that the University?s campuses, as federal grant recipients, must ?evaluate each subrecipient's risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring.? ? The Boulder campus? policy states that monitoring the subaward is a ?collaborative effort? made in both Central Administration as well as in the departments through the Principal Investigator and their supporting Department Administrator.? Completion of a risk analysis and the subrecipient monitoring checklist is listed among the responsibilities of the Central Office. What problem did the audit work identify? The Boulder campus did not perform a risk assessment for six out of the 40 subrecipients we tested (15 percent). However, the campus did perform other monitoring procedures over these subrecipients as the risk assessment process is one procedure in the overall subrecipient monitoring process. Why did this problem occur? The University did not have adequate internal controls in place for monitoring its subrecipients. Specifically, the University?s Boulder campus did not ensure that staff reviewed the subrecipient monitoring checklist in all instances to ensure all appropriate steps were completed, including risk assessments. University personnel indicated that proper staffing was not in place and specific monitoring of risk assessments was not being performed. Why does this problem matter? The University is obligated to adhere to specified requirements as outlined in federal regulations and the respective award agreement. By failing to adhere to the requirements for subrecipient monitoring, the University risks performing inadequate or inappropriate monitoring procedures and thereby increases the risk of subawards being used for unauthorized purposes. See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Recommendation 2022-066 The University of Colorado?s Boulder campus should strengthen its internal controls over, and ensure compliance with, federal subrecipient monitoring requirements for the Research and Development Cluster grant programs by enforcing required reviews of the subrecipient checklist for completeness to ensure all of the appropriate steps are completed, including risk assessments, and by ensuring that appropriate levels of staff are assigned responsibility for the reviews. Response University of Colorado Agree Implementation Date: November 2022 Management agrees with the recommendation. Due to hiring of new staff and an internal audit with similar findings, these actions were in process and implemented as of November 2022. These actions are part of the Sub Team?s standard operating processes and will continue. The proposed corrective action plan is as follows: ? The hiring of new team members in 2022; all team members trained on subcontracting processes and documentation requirements with an emphasis on following standard baseline procedures. ? New Subcontract Administrator (SCA) position tasked with compiling final packets for each sub, which includes a quality check to ensure all documents and signatures required are included. ? Use of subcontract checklist and risk assessments required and consistently done by the team.
Finding 2022-066 Research and Development Cluster Subrecipient Monitoring Compliance Requirement The federal government sponsors research and development (R&D) activities under a variety of types of awards, most commonly grants, cooperative agreements, and contracts, to achieve objectives agreed upon between the federal awarding agency and the non-federal entity. The types of R&D conducted under these awards vary greatly. The objective of an individual project is explained in the federal award letter. R&D activities at the University are subject to federal subrecipient monitoring requirements. Under these requirements, the University is required to monitor its subrecipients to ensure they use funds in accordance with applicable laws, regulations and terms of the award. A subrecipient is defined in federal regulations [2 CFR 200.1] as ?an entity, usually but not limited to non-Federal entities, that receives a subaward from a pass-through entity to carry out part of a federal award; but does not include an individual that is a beneficiary of such award. A subrecipient may also be a recipient of other Federal awards directly from a federal awarding agency.? Federal regulations [2 CFR 200.1] define a subaward as an award provided by a pass-through entity, in this case the University, to an entity to carry out part of a Federal grant award received by the pass-through entity. As part of its subrecipient monitoring process, the University uses a subrecipient monitoring checklist that includes a variety of checkpoints, including whether an approved budget is in place and reviewed: whether the subrecipient had an audit, if applicable, and whether that audit has been reviewed; and whether a risk assessment related to a subrecipient?s potential noncompliance has been performed. During Fiscal Year 2022, the University?s three campuses in total expended approximately $916 million in R&D grant funds: $504 million, $406 million, and $6 million from the Boulder, Denver, and UCCS campuses, respectively. The University passed approximately $120 million to 1,325 subrecipients including other universities and non-profit organizations, to assist in the performance of a wide-range of projects such as research into learning disabilities or the advancement of scientific discovery, or other research related projects. What was the purpose of our audit work and what work was performed? The purpose of the audit work was to determine whether the University?s campuses had adequate internal controls in place over, and complied with, the R&D?s subrecipient monitoring requirements for Fiscal Year 2022. As part of our audit work, we tested 40 subrecipients to determine whether the University campuses? performed the subrecipient risk assessments related to a subrecipient?s potential noncompliance as required by federal regulations. How were the results of the audit work measured? We measured the results of our audit work against the following requirements: ? Federal regulation 2 CFR 200.331(b) requires that the University?s campuses, as federal grant recipients, must ?evaluate each subrecipient's risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring.? ? The Boulder campus? policy states that monitoring the subaward is a ?collaborative effort? made in both Central Administration as well as in the departments through the Principal Investigator and their supporting Department Administrator.? Completion of a risk analysis and the subrecipient monitoring checklist is listed among the responsibilities of the Central Office. What problem did the audit work identify? The Boulder campus did not perform a risk assessment for six out of the 40 subrecipients we tested (15 percent). However, the campus did perform other monitoring procedures over these subrecipients as the risk assessment process is one procedure in the overall subrecipient monitoring process. Why did this problem occur? The University did not have adequate internal controls in place for monitoring its subrecipients. Specifically, the University?s Boulder campus did not ensure that staff reviewed the subrecipient monitoring checklist in all instances to ensure all appropriate steps were completed, including risk assessments. University personnel indicated that proper staffing was not in place and specific monitoring of risk assessments was not being performed. Why does this problem matter? The University is obligated to adhere to specified requirements as outlined in federal regulations and the respective award agreement. By failing to adhere to the requirements for subrecipient monitoring, the University risks performing inadequate or inappropriate monitoring procedures and thereby increases the risk of subawards being used for unauthorized purposes. See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Recommendation 2022-066 The University of Colorado?s Boulder campus should strengthen its internal controls over, and ensure compliance with, federal subrecipient monitoring requirements for the Research and Development Cluster grant programs by enforcing required reviews of the subrecipient checklist for completeness to ensure all of the appropriate steps are completed, including risk assessments, and by ensuring that appropriate levels of staff are assigned responsibility for the reviews. Response University of Colorado Agree Implementation Date: November 2022 Management agrees with the recommendation. Due to hiring of new staff and an internal audit with similar findings, these actions were in process and implemented as of November 2022. These actions are part of the Sub Team?s standard operating processes and will continue. The proposed corrective action plan is as follows: ? The hiring of new team members in 2022; all team members trained on subcontracting processes and documentation requirements with an emphasis on following standard baseline procedures. ? New Subcontract Administrator (SCA) position tasked with compiling final packets for each sub, which includes a quality check to ensure all documents and signatures required are included. ? Use of subcontract checklist and risk assessments required and consistently done by the team.
Finding 2022-066 Research and Development Cluster Subrecipient Monitoring Compliance Requirement The federal government sponsors research and development (R&D) activities under a variety of types of awards, most commonly grants, cooperative agreements, and contracts, to achieve objectives agreed upon between the federal awarding agency and the non-federal entity. The types of R&D conducted under these awards vary greatly. The objective of an individual project is explained in the federal award letter. R&D activities at the University are subject to federal subrecipient monitoring requirements. Under these requirements, the University is required to monitor its subrecipients to ensure they use funds in accordance with applicable laws, regulations and terms of the award. A subrecipient is defined in federal regulations [2 CFR 200.1] as ?an entity, usually but not limited to non-Federal entities, that receives a subaward from a pass-through entity to carry out part of a federal award; but does not include an individual that is a beneficiary of such award. A subrecipient may also be a recipient of other Federal awards directly from a federal awarding agency.? Federal regulations [2 CFR 200.1] define a subaward as an award provided by a pass-through entity, in this case the University, to an entity to carry out part of a Federal grant award received by the pass-through entity. As part of its subrecipient monitoring process, the University uses a subrecipient monitoring checklist that includes a variety of checkpoints, including whether an approved budget is in place and reviewed: whether the subrecipient had an audit, if applicable, and whether that audit has been reviewed; and whether a risk assessment related to a subrecipient?s potential noncompliance has been performed. During Fiscal Year 2022, the University?s three campuses in total expended approximately $916 million in R&D grant funds: $504 million, $406 million, and $6 million from the Boulder, Denver, and UCCS campuses, respectively. The University passed approximately $120 million to 1,325 subrecipients including other universities and non-profit organizations, to assist in the performance of a wide-range of projects such as research into learning disabilities or the advancement of scientific discovery, or other research related projects. What was the purpose of our audit work and what work was performed? The purpose of the audit work was to determine whether the University?s campuses had adequate internal controls in place over, and complied with, the R&D?s subrecipient monitoring requirements for Fiscal Year 2022. As part of our audit work, we tested 40 subrecipients to determine whether the University campuses? performed the subrecipient risk assessments related to a subrecipient?s potential noncompliance as required by federal regulations. How were the results of the audit work measured? We measured the results of our audit work against the following requirements: ? Federal regulation 2 CFR 200.331(b) requires that the University?s campuses, as federal grant recipients, must ?evaluate each subrecipient's risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring.? ? The Boulder campus? policy states that monitoring the subaward is a ?collaborative effort? made in both Central Administration as well as in the departments through the Principal Investigator and their supporting Department Administrator.? Completion of a risk analysis and the subrecipient monitoring checklist is listed among the responsibilities of the Central Office. What problem did the audit work identify? The Boulder campus did not perform a risk assessment for six out of the 40 subrecipients we tested (15 percent). However, the campus did perform other monitoring procedures over these subrecipients as the risk assessment process is one procedure in the overall subrecipient monitoring process. Why did this problem occur? The University did not have adequate internal controls in place for monitoring its subrecipients. Specifically, the University?s Boulder campus did not ensure that staff reviewed the subrecipient monitoring checklist in all instances to ensure all appropriate steps were completed, including risk assessments. University personnel indicated that proper staffing was not in place and specific monitoring of risk assessments was not being performed. Why does this problem matter? The University is obligated to adhere to specified requirements as outlined in federal regulations and the respective award agreement. By failing to adhere to the requirements for subrecipient monitoring, the University risks performing inadequate or inappropriate monitoring procedures and thereby increases the risk of subawards being used for unauthorized purposes. See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Recommendation 2022-066 The University of Colorado?s Boulder campus should strengthen its internal controls over, and ensure compliance with, federal subrecipient monitoring requirements for the Research and Development Cluster grant programs by enforcing required reviews of the subrecipient checklist for completeness to ensure all of the appropriate steps are completed, including risk assessments, and by ensuring that appropriate levels of staff are assigned responsibility for the reviews. Response University of Colorado Agree Implementation Date: November 2022 Management agrees with the recommendation. Due to hiring of new staff and an internal audit with similar findings, these actions were in process and implemented as of November 2022. These actions are part of the Sub Team?s standard operating processes and will continue. The proposed corrective action plan is as follows: ? The hiring of new team members in 2022; all team members trained on subcontracting processes and documentation requirements with an emphasis on following standard baseline procedures. ? New Subcontract Administrator (SCA) position tasked with compiling final packets for each sub, which includes a quality check to ensure all documents and signatures required are included. ? Use of subcontract checklist and risk assessments required and consistently done by the team.
Finding 2022-066 Research and Development Cluster Subrecipient Monitoring Compliance Requirement The federal government sponsors research and development (R&D) activities under a variety of types of awards, most commonly grants, cooperative agreements, and contracts, to achieve objectives agreed upon between the federal awarding agency and the non-federal entity. The types of R&D conducted under these awards vary greatly. The objective of an individual project is explained in the federal award letter. R&D activities at the University are subject to federal subrecipient monitoring requirements. Under these requirements, the University is required to monitor its subrecipients to ensure they use funds in accordance with applicable laws, regulations and terms of the award. A subrecipient is defined in federal regulations [2 CFR 200.1] as ?an entity, usually but not limited to non-Federal entities, that receives a subaward from a pass-through entity to carry out part of a federal award; but does not include an individual that is a beneficiary of such award. A subrecipient may also be a recipient of other Federal awards directly from a federal awarding agency.? Federal regulations [2 CFR 200.1] define a subaward as an award provided by a pass-through entity, in this case the University, to an entity to carry out part of a Federal grant award received by the pass-through entity. As part of its subrecipient monitoring process, the University uses a subrecipient monitoring checklist that includes a variety of checkpoints, including whether an approved budget is in place and reviewed: whether the subrecipient had an audit, if applicable, and whether that audit has been reviewed; and whether a risk assessment related to a subrecipient?s potential noncompliance has been performed. During Fiscal Year 2022, the University?s three campuses in total expended approximately $916 million in R&D grant funds: $504 million, $406 million, and $6 million from the Boulder, Denver, and UCCS campuses, respectively. The University passed approximately $120 million to 1,325 subrecipients including other universities and non-profit organizations, to assist in the performance of a wide-range of projects such as research into learning disabilities or the advancement of scientific discovery, or other research related projects. What was the purpose of our audit work and what work was performed? The purpose of the audit work was to determine whether the University?s campuses had adequate internal controls in place over, and complied with, the R&D?s subrecipient monitoring requirements for Fiscal Year 2022. As part of our audit work, we tested 40 subrecipients to determine whether the University campuses? performed the subrecipient risk assessments related to a subrecipient?s potential noncompliance as required by federal regulations. How were the results of the audit work measured? We measured the results of our audit work against the following requirements: ? Federal regulation 2 CFR 200.331(b) requires that the University?s campuses, as federal grant recipients, must ?evaluate each subrecipient's risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring.? ? The Boulder campus? policy states that monitoring the subaward is a ?collaborative effort? made in both Central Administration as well as in the departments through the Principal Investigator and their supporting Department Administrator.? Completion of a risk analysis and the subrecipient monitoring checklist is listed among the responsibilities of the Central Office. What problem did the audit work identify? The Boulder campus did not perform a risk assessment for six out of the 40 subrecipients we tested (15 percent). However, the campus did perform other monitoring procedures over these subrecipients as the risk assessment process is one procedure in the overall subrecipient monitoring process. Why did this problem occur? The University did not have adequate internal controls in place for monitoring its subrecipients. Specifically, the University?s Boulder campus did not ensure that staff reviewed the subrecipient monitoring checklist in all instances to ensure all appropriate steps were completed, including risk assessments. University personnel indicated that proper staffing was not in place and specific monitoring of risk assessments was not being performed. Why does this problem matter? The University is obligated to adhere to specified requirements as outlined in federal regulations and the respective award agreement. By failing to adhere to the requirements for subrecipient monitoring, the University risks performing inadequate or inappropriate monitoring procedures and thereby increases the risk of subawards being used for unauthorized purposes. See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Recommendation 2022-066 The University of Colorado?s Boulder campus should strengthen its internal controls over, and ensure compliance with, federal subrecipient monitoring requirements for the Research and Development Cluster grant programs by enforcing required reviews of the subrecipient checklist for completeness to ensure all of the appropriate steps are completed, including risk assessments, and by ensuring that appropriate levels of staff are assigned responsibility for the reviews. Response University of Colorado Agree Implementation Date: November 2022 Management agrees with the recommendation. Due to hiring of new staff and an internal audit with similar findings, these actions were in process and implemented as of November 2022. These actions are part of the Sub Team?s standard operating processes and will continue. The proposed corrective action plan is as follows: ? The hiring of new team members in 2022; all team members trained on subcontracting processes and documentation requirements with an emphasis on following standard baseline procedures. ? New Subcontract Administrator (SCA) position tasked with compiling final packets for each sub, which includes a quality check to ensure all documents and signatures required are included. ? Use of subcontract checklist and risk assessments required and consistently done by the team.
Finding 2022-066 Research and Development Cluster Subrecipient Monitoring Compliance Requirement The federal government sponsors research and development (R&D) activities under a variety of types of awards, most commonly grants, cooperative agreements, and contracts, to achieve objectives agreed upon between the federal awarding agency and the non-federal entity. The types of R&D conducted under these awards vary greatly. The objective of an individual project is explained in the federal award letter. R&D activities at the University are subject to federal subrecipient monitoring requirements. Under these requirements, the University is required to monitor its subrecipients to ensure they use funds in accordance with applicable laws, regulations and terms of the award. A subrecipient is defined in federal regulations [2 CFR 200.1] as ?an entity, usually but not limited to non-Federal entities, that receives a subaward from a pass-through entity to carry out part of a federal award; but does not include an individual that is a beneficiary of such award. A subrecipient may also be a recipient of other Federal awards directly from a federal awarding agency.? Federal regulations [2 CFR 200.1] define a subaward as an award provided by a pass-through entity, in this case the University, to an entity to carry out part of a Federal grant award received by the pass-through entity. As part of its subrecipient monitoring process, the University uses a subrecipient monitoring checklist that includes a variety of checkpoints, including whether an approved budget is in place and reviewed: whether the subrecipient had an audit, if applicable, and whether that audit has been reviewed; and whether a risk assessment related to a subrecipient?s potential noncompliance has been performed. During Fiscal Year 2022, the University?s three campuses in total expended approximately $916 million in R&D grant funds: $504 million, $406 million, and $6 million from the Boulder, Denver, and UCCS campuses, respectively. The University passed approximately $120 million to 1,325 subrecipients including other universities and non-profit organizations, to assist in the performance of a wide-range of projects such as research into learning disabilities or the advancement of scientific discovery, or other research related projects. What was the purpose of our audit work and what work was performed? The purpose of the audit work was to determine whether the University?s campuses had adequate internal controls in place over, and complied with, the R&D?s subrecipient monitoring requirements for Fiscal Year 2022. As part of our audit work, we tested 40 subrecipients to determine whether the University campuses? performed the subrecipient risk assessments related to a subrecipient?s potential noncompliance as required by federal regulations. How were the results of the audit work measured? We measured the results of our audit work against the following requirements: ? Federal regulation 2 CFR 200.331(b) requires that the University?s campuses, as federal grant recipients, must ?evaluate each subrecipient's risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring.? ? The Boulder campus? policy states that monitoring the subaward is a ?collaborative effort? made in both Central Administration as well as in the departments through the Principal Investigator and their supporting Department Administrator.? Completion of a risk analysis and the subrecipient monitoring checklist is listed among the responsibilities of the Central Office. What problem did the audit work identify? The Boulder campus did not perform a risk assessment for six out of the 40 subrecipients we tested (15 percent). However, the campus did perform other monitoring procedures over these subrecipients as the risk assessment process is one procedure in the overall subrecipient monitoring process. Why did this problem occur? The University did not have adequate internal controls in place for monitoring its subrecipients. Specifically, the University?s Boulder campus did not ensure that staff reviewed the subrecipient monitoring checklist in all instances to ensure all appropriate steps were completed, including risk assessments. University personnel indicated that proper staffing was not in place and specific monitoring of risk assessments was not being performed. Why does this problem matter? The University is obligated to adhere to specified requirements as outlined in federal regulations and the respective award agreement. By failing to adhere to the requirements for subrecipient monitoring, the University risks performing inadequate or inappropriate monitoring procedures and thereby increases the risk of subawards being used for unauthorized purposes. See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Recommendation 2022-066 The University of Colorado?s Boulder campus should strengthen its internal controls over, and ensure compliance with, federal subrecipient monitoring requirements for the Research and Development Cluster grant programs by enforcing required reviews of the subrecipient checklist for completeness to ensure all of the appropriate steps are completed, including risk assessments, and by ensuring that appropriate levels of staff are assigned responsibility for the reviews. Response University of Colorado Agree Implementation Date: November 2022 Management agrees with the recommendation. Due to hiring of new staff and an internal audit with similar findings, these actions were in process and implemented as of November 2022. These actions are part of the Sub Team?s standard operating processes and will continue. The proposed corrective action plan is as follows: ? The hiring of new team members in 2022; all team members trained on subcontracting processes and documentation requirements with an emphasis on following standard baseline procedures. ? New Subcontract Administrator (SCA) position tasked with compiling final packets for each sub, which includes a quality check to ensure all documents and signatures required are included. ? Use of subcontract checklist and risk assessments required and consistently done by the team.
Finding 2022-066 Research and Development Cluster Subrecipient Monitoring Compliance Requirement The federal government sponsors research and development (R&D) activities under a variety of types of awards, most commonly grants, cooperative agreements, and contracts, to achieve objectives agreed upon between the federal awarding agency and the non-federal entity. The types of R&D conducted under these awards vary greatly. The objective of an individual project is explained in the federal award letter. R&D activities at the University are subject to federal subrecipient monitoring requirements. Under these requirements, the University is required to monitor its subrecipients to ensure they use funds in accordance with applicable laws, regulations and terms of the award. A subrecipient is defined in federal regulations [2 CFR 200.1] as ?an entity, usually but not limited to non-Federal entities, that receives a subaward from a pass-through entity to carry out part of a federal award; but does not include an individual that is a beneficiary of such award. A subrecipient may also be a recipient of other Federal awards directly from a federal awarding agency.? Federal regulations [2 CFR 200.1] define a subaward as an award provided by a pass-through entity, in this case the University, to an entity to carry out part of a Federal grant award received by the pass-through entity. As part of its subrecipient monitoring process, the University uses a subrecipient monitoring checklist that includes a variety of checkpoints, including whether an approved budget is in place and reviewed: whether the subrecipient had an audit, if applicable, and whether that audit has been reviewed; and whether a risk assessment related to a subrecipient?s potential noncompliance has been performed. During Fiscal Year 2022, the University?s three campuses in total expended approximately $916 million in R&D grant funds: $504 million, $406 million, and $6 million from the Boulder, Denver, and UCCS campuses, respectively. The University passed approximately $120 million to 1,325 subrecipients including other universities and non-profit organizations, to assist in the performance of a wide-range of projects such as research into learning disabilities or the advancement of scientific discovery, or other research related projects. What was the purpose of our audit work and what work was performed? The purpose of the audit work was to determine whether the University?s campuses had adequate internal controls in place over, and complied with, the R&D?s subrecipient monitoring requirements for Fiscal Year 2022. As part of our audit work, we tested 40 subrecipients to determine whether the University campuses? performed the subrecipient risk assessments related to a subrecipient?s potential noncompliance as required by federal regulations. How were the results of the audit work measured? We measured the results of our audit work against the following requirements: ? Federal regulation 2 CFR 200.331(b) requires that the University?s campuses, as federal grant recipients, must ?evaluate each subrecipient's risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring.? ? The Boulder campus? policy states that monitoring the subaward is a ?collaborative effort? made in both Central Administration as well as in the departments through the Principal Investigator and their supporting Department Administrator.? Completion of a risk analysis and the subrecipient monitoring checklist is listed among the responsibilities of the Central Office. What problem did the audit work identify? The Boulder campus did not perform a risk assessment for six out of the 40 subrecipients we tested (15 percent). However, the campus did perform other monitoring procedures over these subrecipients as the risk assessment process is one procedure in the overall subrecipient monitoring process. Why did this problem occur? The University did not have adequate internal controls in place for monitoring its subrecipients. Specifically, the University?s Boulder campus did not ensure that staff reviewed the subrecipient monitoring checklist in all instances to ensure all appropriate steps were completed, including risk assessments. University personnel indicated that proper staffing was not in place and specific monitoring of risk assessments was not being performed. Why does this problem matter? The University is obligated to adhere to specified requirements as outlined in federal regulations and the respective award agreement. By failing to adhere to the requirements for subrecipient monitoring, the University risks performing inadequate or inappropriate monitoring procedures and thereby increases the risk of subawards being used for unauthorized purposes. See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Recommendation 2022-066 The University of Colorado?s Boulder campus should strengthen its internal controls over, and ensure compliance with, federal subrecipient monitoring requirements for the Research and Development Cluster grant programs by enforcing required reviews of the subrecipient checklist for completeness to ensure all of the appropriate steps are completed, including risk assessments, and by ensuring that appropriate levels of staff are assigned responsibility for the reviews. Response University of Colorado Agree Implementation Date: November 2022 Management agrees with the recommendation. Due to hiring of new staff and an internal audit with similar findings, these actions were in process and implemented as of November 2022. These actions are part of the Sub Team?s standard operating processes and will continue. The proposed corrective action plan is as follows: ? The hiring of new team members in 2022; all team members trained on subcontracting processes and documentation requirements with an emphasis on following standard baseline procedures. ? New Subcontract Administrator (SCA) position tasked with compiling final packets for each sub, which includes a quality check to ensure all documents and signatures required are included. ? Use of subcontract checklist and risk assessments required and consistently done by the team.
Finding 2022-066 Research and Development Cluster Subrecipient Monitoring Compliance Requirement The federal government sponsors research and development (R&D) activities under a variety of types of awards, most commonly grants, cooperative agreements, and contracts, to achieve objectives agreed upon between the federal awarding agency and the non-federal entity. The types of R&D conducted under these awards vary greatly. The objective of an individual project is explained in the federal award letter. R&D activities at the University are subject to federal subrecipient monitoring requirements. Under these requirements, the University is required to monitor its subrecipients to ensure they use funds in accordance with applicable laws, regulations and terms of the award. A subrecipient is defined in federal regulations [2 CFR 200.1] as ?an entity, usually but not limited to non-Federal entities, that receives a subaward from a pass-through entity to carry out part of a federal award; but does not include an individual that is a beneficiary of such award. A subrecipient may also be a recipient of other Federal awards directly from a federal awarding agency.? Federal regulations [2 CFR 200.1] define a subaward as an award provided by a pass-through entity, in this case the University, to an entity to carry out part of a Federal grant award received by the pass-through entity. As part of its subrecipient monitoring process, the University uses a subrecipient monitoring checklist that includes a variety of checkpoints, including whether an approved budget is in place and reviewed: whether the subrecipient had an audit, if applicable, and whether that audit has been reviewed; and whether a risk assessment related to a subrecipient?s potential noncompliance has been performed. During Fiscal Year 2022, the University?s three campuses in total expended approximately $916 million in R&D grant funds: $504 million, $406 million, and $6 million from the Boulder, Denver, and UCCS campuses, respectively. The University passed approximately $120 million to 1,325 subrecipients including other universities and non-profit organizations, to assist in the performance of a wide-range of projects such as research into learning disabilities or the advancement of scientific discovery, or other research related projects. What was the purpose of our audit work and what work was performed? The purpose of the audit work was to determine whether the University?s campuses had adequate internal controls in place over, and complied with, the R&D?s subrecipient monitoring requirements for Fiscal Year 2022. As part of our audit work, we tested 40 subrecipients to determine whether the University campuses? performed the subrecipient risk assessments related to a subrecipient?s potential noncompliance as required by federal regulations. How were the results of the audit work measured? We measured the results of our audit work against the following requirements: ? Federal regulation 2 CFR 200.331(b) requires that the University?s campuses, as federal grant recipients, must ?evaluate each subrecipient's risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring.? ? The Boulder campus? policy states that monitoring the subaward is a ?collaborative effort? made in both Central Administration as well as in the departments through the Principal Investigator and their supporting Department Administrator.? Completion of a risk analysis and the subrecipient monitoring checklist is listed among the responsibilities of the Central Office. What problem did the audit work identify? The Boulder campus did not perform a risk assessment for six out of the 40 subrecipients we tested (15 percent). However, the campus did perform other monitoring procedures over these subrecipients as the risk assessment process is one procedure in the overall subrecipient monitoring process. Why did this problem occur? The University did not have adequate internal controls in place for monitoring its subrecipients. Specifically, the University?s Boulder campus did not ensure that staff reviewed the subrecipient monitoring checklist in all instances to ensure all appropriate steps were completed, including risk assessments. University personnel indicated that proper staffing was not in place and specific monitoring of risk assessments was not being performed. Why does this problem matter? The University is obligated to adhere to specified requirements as outlined in federal regulations and the respective award agreement. By failing to adhere to the requirements for subrecipient monitoring, the University risks performing inadequate or inappropriate monitoring procedures and thereby increases the risk of subawards being used for unauthorized purposes. See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Recommendation 2022-066 The University of Colorado?s Boulder campus should strengthen its internal controls over, and ensure compliance with, federal subrecipient monitoring requirements for the Research and Development Cluster grant programs by enforcing required reviews of the subrecipient checklist for completeness to ensure all of the appropriate steps are completed, including risk assessments, and by ensuring that appropriate levels of staff are assigned responsibility for the reviews. Response University of Colorado Agree Implementation Date: November 2022 Management agrees with the recommendation. Due to hiring of new staff and an internal audit with similar findings, these actions were in process and implemented as of November 2022. These actions are part of the Sub Team?s standard operating processes and will continue. The proposed corrective action plan is as follows: ? The hiring of new team members in 2022; all team members trained on subcontracting processes and documentation requirements with an emphasis on following standard baseline procedures. ? New Subcontract Administrator (SCA) position tasked with compiling final packets for each sub, which includes a quality check to ensure all documents and signatures required are included. ? Use of subcontract checklist and risk assessments required and consistently done by the team.
Finding 2022-066 Research and Development Cluster Subrecipient Monitoring Compliance Requirement The federal government sponsors research and development (R&D) activities under a variety of types of awards, most commonly grants, cooperative agreements, and contracts, to achieve objectives agreed upon between the federal awarding agency and the non-federal entity. The types of R&D conducted under these awards vary greatly. The objective of an individual project is explained in the federal award letter. R&D activities at the University are subject to federal subrecipient monitoring requirements. Under these requirements, the University is required to monitor its subrecipients to ensure they use funds in accordance with applicable laws, regulations and terms of the award. A subrecipient is defined in federal regulations [2 CFR 200.1] as ?an entity, usually but not limited to non-Federal entities, that receives a subaward from a pass-through entity to carry out part of a federal award; but does not include an individual that is a beneficiary of such award. A subrecipient may also be a recipient of other Federal awards directly from a federal awarding agency.? Federal regulations [2 CFR 200.1] define a subaward as an award provided by a pass-through entity, in this case the University, to an entity to carry out part of a Federal grant award received by the pass-through entity. As part of its subrecipient monitoring process, the University uses a subrecipient monitoring checklist that includes a variety of checkpoints, including whether an approved budget is in place and reviewed: whether the subrecipient had an audit, if applicable, and whether that audit has been reviewed; and whether a risk assessment related to a subrecipient?s potential noncompliance has been performed. During Fiscal Year 2022, the University?s three campuses in total expended approximately $916 million in R&D grant funds: $504 million, $406 million, and $6 million from the Boulder, Denver, and UCCS campuses, respectively. The University passed approximately $120 million to 1,325 subrecipients including other universities and non-profit organizations, to assist in the performance of a wide-range of projects such as research into learning disabilities or the advancement of scientific discovery, or other research related projects. What was the purpose of our audit work and what work was performed? The purpose of the audit work was to determine whether the University?s campuses had adequate internal controls in place over, and complied with, the R&D?s subrecipient monitoring requirements for Fiscal Year 2022. As part of our audit work, we tested 40 subrecipients to determine whether the University campuses? performed the subrecipient risk assessments related to a subrecipient?s potential noncompliance as required by federal regulations. How were the results of the audit work measured? We measured the results of our audit work against the following requirements: ? Federal regulation 2 CFR 200.331(b) requires that the University?s campuses, as federal grant recipients, must ?evaluate each subrecipient's risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring.? ? The Boulder campus? policy states that monitoring the subaward is a ?collaborative effort? made in both Central Administration as well as in the departments through the Principal Investigator and their supporting Department Administrator.? Completion of a risk analysis and the subrecipient monitoring checklist is listed among the responsibilities of the Central Office. What problem did the audit work identify? The Boulder campus did not perform a risk assessment for six out of the 40 subrecipients we tested (15 percent). However, the campus did perform other monitoring procedures over these subrecipients as the risk assessment process is one procedure in the overall subrecipient monitoring process. Why did this problem occur? The University did not have adequate internal controls in place for monitoring its subrecipients. Specifically, the University?s Boulder campus did not ensure that staff reviewed the subrecipient monitoring checklist in all instances to ensure all appropriate steps were completed, including risk assessments. University personnel indicated that proper staffing was not in place and specific monitoring of risk assessments was not being performed. Why does this problem matter? The University is obligated to adhere to specified requirements as outlined in federal regulations and the respective award agreement. By failing to adhere to the requirements for subrecipient monitoring, the University risks performing inadequate or inappropriate monitoring procedures and thereby increases the risk of subawards being used for unauthorized purposes. See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table Recommendation 2022-066 The University of Colorado?s Boulder campus should strengthen its internal controls over, and ensure compliance with, federal subrecipient monitoring requirements for the Research and Development Cluster grant programs by enforcing required reviews of the subrecipient checklist for completeness to ensure all of the appropriate steps are completed, including risk assessments, and by ensuring that appropriate levels of staff are assigned responsibility for the reviews. Response University of Colorado Agree Implementation Date: November 2022 Management agrees with the recommendation. Due to hiring of new staff and an internal audit with similar findings, these actions were in process and implemented as of November 2022. These actions are part of the Sub Team?s standard operating processes and will continue. The proposed corrective action plan is as follows: ? The hiring of new team members in 2022; all team members trained on subcontracting processes and documentation requirements with an emphasis on following standard baseline procedures. ? New Subcontract Administrator (SCA) position tasked with compiling final packets for each sub, which includes a quality check to ensure all documents and signatures required are included. ? Use of subcontract checklist and risk assessments required and consistently done by the team.