Significant Deficiency and Noncompliance over Subrecipient Monitoring Repeat Finding: Yes Condition: Management did not verify that its subrecipient’s were not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transactions. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR §200.303, the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal controls over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Pursuant to 31 USC 7502(f)(2) (Single Audit Act Amendments of 1996 (Pub. L. No. 104-156)), 2 CFR sections 200.330, .331, and .501(h), a pass-through entity must identify the award and applicable requirements, evaluate risk, monitor, and ensure accountability of subrecipients. Additionally, when entering into subaward transactions, the non-federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. This verification may be accomplished by (1) checking the System for Award Management (SAM) Exclusions maintained by the General Services Administration (GSA). Cause: Program personnel were unaware of the requirement included in Uniform Guidance related to procedures required for subrecipient monitoring. Effect: If subrecipients were not in compliance with Uniform Guidance, the Foundation would not identify the noncompliance timely. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend that the Foundation continue to improve the subrecipient monitoring controls its Federal programs and prepare and maintain a written plan to monitor its subrecipients. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Refer to management’s corrective action plans. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Significant Deficiency and Noncompliance over Subrecipient Monitoring Repeat Finding: Yes Condition: Management did not verify that its subrecipient’s were not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transactions. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR §200.303, the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal controls over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Pursuant to 31 USC 7502(f)(2) (Single Audit Act Amendments of 1996 (Pub. L. No. 104-156)), 2 CFR sections 200.330, .331, and .501(h), a pass-through entity must identify the award and applicable requirements, evaluate risk, monitor, and ensure accountability of subrecipients. Additionally, when entering into subaward transactions, the non-federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. This verification may be accomplished by (1) checking the System for Award Management (SAM) Exclusions maintained by the General Services Administration (GSA). Cause: Program personnel were unaware of the requirement included in Uniform Guidance related to procedures required for subrecipient monitoring. Effect: If subrecipients were not in compliance with Uniform Guidance, the Foundation would not identify the noncompliance timely. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend that the Foundation continue to improve the subrecipient monitoring controls its Federal programs and prepare and maintain a written plan to monitor its subrecipients. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Refer to management’s corrective action plans. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Significant Deficiency and Noncompliance over Subrecipient Monitoring Repeat Finding: Yes Condition: Management did not verify that its subrecipient’s were not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transactions. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR §200.303, the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal controls over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Pursuant to 31 USC 7502(f)(2) (Single Audit Act Amendments of 1996 (Pub. L. No. 104-156)), 2 CFR sections 200.330, .331, and .501(h), a pass-through entity must identify the award and applicable requirements, evaluate risk, monitor, and ensure accountability of subrecipients. Additionally, when entering into subaward transactions, the non-federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. This verification may be accomplished by (1) checking the System for Award Management (SAM) Exclusions maintained by the General Services Administration (GSA). Cause: Program personnel were unaware of the requirement included in Uniform Guidance related to procedures required for subrecipient monitoring. Effect: If subrecipients were not in compliance with Uniform Guidance, the Foundation would not identify the noncompliance timely. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend that the Foundation continue to improve the subrecipient monitoring controls its Federal programs and prepare and maintain a written plan to monitor its subrecipients. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Refer to management’s corrective action plans. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Significant Deficiency and Noncompliance over Subrecipient Monitoring Repeat Finding: Yes Condition: Management did not verify that its subrecipient’s were not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transactions. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR §200.303, the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal controls over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Pursuant to 31 USC 7502(f)(2) (Single Audit Act Amendments of 1996 (Pub. L. No. 104-156)), 2 CFR sections 200.330, .331, and .501(h), a pass-through entity must identify the award and applicable requirements, evaluate risk, monitor, and ensure accountability of subrecipients. Additionally, when entering into subaward transactions, the non-federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. This verification may be accomplished by (1) checking the System for Award Management (SAM) Exclusions maintained by the General Services Administration (GSA). Cause: Program personnel were unaware of the requirement included in Uniform Guidance related to procedures required for subrecipient monitoring. Effect: If subrecipients were not in compliance with Uniform Guidance, the Foundation would not identify the noncompliance timely. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend that the Foundation continue to improve the subrecipient monitoring controls its Federal programs and prepare and maintain a written plan to monitor its subrecipients. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Refer to management’s corrective action plans. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Significant Deficiency and Noncompliance over Subrecipient Monitoring Repeat Finding: Yes Condition: Management did not verify that its subrecipient’s were not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transactions. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR §200.303, the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal controls over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Pursuant to 31 USC 7502(f)(2) (Single Audit Act Amendments of 1996 (Pub. L. No. 104-156)), 2 CFR sections 200.330, .331, and .501(h), a pass-through entity must identify the award and applicable requirements, evaluate risk, monitor, and ensure accountability of subrecipients. Additionally, when entering into subaward transactions, the non-federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. This verification may be accomplished by (1) checking the System for Award Management (SAM) Exclusions maintained by the General Services Administration (GSA). Cause: Program personnel were unaware of the requirement included in Uniform Guidance related to procedures required for subrecipient monitoring. Effect: If subrecipients were not in compliance with Uniform Guidance, the Foundation would not identify the noncompliance timely. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend that the Foundation continue to improve the subrecipient monitoring controls its Federal programs and prepare and maintain a written plan to monitor its subrecipients. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Refer to management’s corrective action plans. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Significant Deficiency and Noncompliance over Subrecipient Monitoring Repeat Finding: Yes Condition: Management did not verify that its subrecipient’s were not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transactions. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR §200.303, the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal controls over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Pursuant to 31 USC 7502(f)(2) (Single Audit Act Amendments of 1996 (Pub. L. No. 104-156)), 2 CFR sections 200.330, .331, and .501(h), a pass-through entity must identify the award and applicable requirements, evaluate risk, monitor, and ensure accountability of subrecipients. Additionally, when entering into subaward transactions, the non-federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. This verification may be accomplished by (1) checking the System for Award Management (SAM) Exclusions maintained by the General Services Administration (GSA). Cause: Program personnel were unaware of the requirement included in Uniform Guidance related to procedures required for subrecipient monitoring. Effect: If subrecipients were not in compliance with Uniform Guidance, the Foundation would not identify the noncompliance timely. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend that the Foundation continue to improve the subrecipient monitoring controls its Federal programs and prepare and maintain a written plan to monitor its subrecipients. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Refer to management’s corrective action plans. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Significant Deficiency and Noncompliance over Subrecipient Monitoring Repeat Finding: Yes Condition: Management did not verify that its subrecipient’s were not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transactions. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR §200.303, the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal controls over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Pursuant to 31 USC 7502(f)(2) (Single Audit Act Amendments of 1996 (Pub. L. No. 104-156)), 2 CFR sections 200.330, .331, and .501(h), a pass-through entity must identify the award and applicable requirements, evaluate risk, monitor, and ensure accountability of subrecipients. Additionally, when entering into subaward transactions, the non-federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. This verification may be accomplished by (1) checking the System for Award Management (SAM) Exclusions maintained by the General Services Administration (GSA). Cause: Program personnel were unaware of the requirement included in Uniform Guidance related to procedures required for subrecipient monitoring. Effect: If subrecipients were not in compliance with Uniform Guidance, the Foundation would not identify the noncompliance timely. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend that the Foundation continue to improve the subrecipient monitoring controls its Federal programs and prepare and maintain a written plan to monitor its subrecipients. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Refer to management’s corrective action plans. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Significant Deficiency and Noncompliance over Subrecipient Monitoring Repeat Finding: Yes Condition: Management did not verify that its subrecipient’s were not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transactions. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR §200.303, the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal controls over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Pursuant to 31 USC 7502(f)(2) (Single Audit Act Amendments of 1996 (Pub. L. No. 104-156)), 2 CFR sections 200.330, .331, and .501(h), a pass-through entity must identify the award and applicable requirements, evaluate risk, monitor, and ensure accountability of subrecipients. Additionally, when entering into subaward transactions, the non-federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. This verification may be accomplished by (1) checking the System for Award Management (SAM) Exclusions maintained by the General Services Administration (GSA). Cause: Program personnel were unaware of the requirement included in Uniform Guidance related to procedures required for subrecipient monitoring. Effect: If subrecipients were not in compliance with Uniform Guidance, the Foundation would not identify the noncompliance timely. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend that the Foundation continue to improve the subrecipient monitoring controls its Federal programs and prepare and maintain a written plan to monitor its subrecipients. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Refer to management’s corrective action plans. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Significant Deficiency and Noncompliance over Subrecipient Monitoring Repeat Finding: Yes Condition: Management did not verify that its subrecipient’s were not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transactions. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR §200.303, the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal controls over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Pursuant to 31 USC 7502(f)(2) (Single Audit Act Amendments of 1996 (Pub. L. No. 104-156)), 2 CFR sections 200.330, .331, and .501(h), a pass-through entity must identify the award and applicable requirements, evaluate risk, monitor, and ensure accountability of subrecipients. Additionally, when entering into subaward transactions, the non-federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. This verification may be accomplished by (1) checking the System for Award Management (SAM) Exclusions maintained by the General Services Administration (GSA). Cause: Program personnel were unaware of the requirement included in Uniform Guidance related to procedures required for subrecipient monitoring. Effect: If subrecipients were not in compliance with Uniform Guidance, the Foundation would not identify the noncompliance timely. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend that the Foundation continue to improve the subrecipient monitoring controls its Federal programs and prepare and maintain a written plan to monitor its subrecipients. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Refer to management’s corrective action plans. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Significant Deficiency and Noncompliance over Subrecipient Monitoring Repeat Finding: Yes Condition: Management did not verify that its subrecipient’s were not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transactions. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR §200.303, the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal controls over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Pursuant to 31 USC 7502(f)(2) (Single Audit Act Amendments of 1996 (Pub. L. No. 104-156)), 2 CFR sections 200.330, .331, and .501(h), a pass-through entity must identify the award and applicable requirements, evaluate risk, monitor, and ensure accountability of subrecipients. Additionally, when entering into subaward transactions, the non-federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. This verification may be accomplished by (1) checking the System for Award Management (SAM) Exclusions maintained by the General Services Administration (GSA). Cause: Program personnel were unaware of the requirement included in Uniform Guidance related to procedures required for subrecipient monitoring. Effect: If subrecipients were not in compliance with Uniform Guidance, the Foundation would not identify the noncompliance timely. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend that the Foundation continue to improve the subrecipient monitoring controls its Federal programs and prepare and maintain a written plan to monitor its subrecipients. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Refer to management’s corrective action plans. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Significant Deficiency and Noncompliance over Subrecipient Monitoring Repeat Finding: Yes Condition: Management did not verify that its subrecipient’s were not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transactions. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR §200.303, the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal controls over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Pursuant to 31 USC 7502(f)(2) (Single Audit Act Amendments of 1996 (Pub. L. No. 104-156)), 2 CFR sections 200.330, .331, and .501(h), a pass-through entity must identify the award and applicable requirements, evaluate risk, monitor, and ensure accountability of subrecipients. Additionally, when entering into subaward transactions, the non-federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. This verification may be accomplished by (1) checking the System for Award Management (SAM) Exclusions maintained by the General Services Administration (GSA). Cause: Program personnel were unaware of the requirement included in Uniform Guidance related to procedures required for subrecipient monitoring. Effect: If subrecipients were not in compliance with Uniform Guidance, the Foundation would not identify the noncompliance timely. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend that the Foundation continue to improve the subrecipient monitoring controls its Federal programs and prepare and maintain a written plan to monitor its subrecipients. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Refer to management’s corrective action plans. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Significant Deficiency and Noncompliance over Subrecipient Monitoring Repeat Finding: Yes Condition: Management did not verify that its subrecipient’s were not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transactions. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR §200.303, the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal controls over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Pursuant to 31 USC 7502(f)(2) (Single Audit Act Amendments of 1996 (Pub. L. No. 104-156)), 2 CFR sections 200.330, .331, and .501(h), a pass-through entity must identify the award and applicable requirements, evaluate risk, monitor, and ensure accountability of subrecipients. Additionally, when entering into subaward transactions, the non-federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. This verification may be accomplished by (1) checking the System for Award Management (SAM) Exclusions maintained by the General Services Administration (GSA). Cause: Program personnel were unaware of the requirement included in Uniform Guidance related to procedures required for subrecipient monitoring. Effect: If subrecipients were not in compliance with Uniform Guidance, the Foundation would not identify the noncompliance timely. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend that the Foundation continue to improve the subrecipient monitoring controls its Federal programs and prepare and maintain a written plan to monitor its subrecipients. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Refer to management’s corrective action plans. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Federal agency name: U.S. National Science Foundation & U.S. Department of Commerce Federal program title: Geosciences, Computer and Information Science and Engineering, Office of International Science and Engineering & NOAA – Cooperative Institute AL No.: 47.050, 47.070, 47.079 & 11.432 Federal Award Identification No. & Award Period: EAR-1849458 (06/01/2019 -05/31/2024), EAR-2012893 (10/01/2020 – 08/31/2025), OAC-1931278 (10/1/2019 – 09/30/2023), EAR- 2244446 (03/01/2023 – 02/28/2026), OAC-2209833 (01/01/2023 – 12/31/2026), OAC-1829744 (09/01/2018 – 08/31/2023), OAC-1835592 (01/01/2009 – 12/31/2022), OAC-1835818 (10/01/2018 – 09/30/2024), OAC-2103780 (10/01/2021 – 09/30/2026), OAC-2118329 (10/01/2021 – 09/30/2026), OISE-1855654 (05/15/2019 – 12/31/2023) & A22NWS4320003 (08/01/2022 – 07/25/2025, 08/01/2022 – 07/25/2025, 04/01/2023 – 03/31/2024, 06/01/2023 – 05/31/2024, 06/01/2023 – 05/31/2026, 06/01/2023 – 05/31/2025, 06/01/2023 – 05/31/2025) Pass Through Entity: University of Alabama MW2023-003 SUBRECIPIENT MONITORING Material Weakness Criteria The regulations are documented in 31 USC 7502(f)(2), 2 CFR sections 200.330, .331, and .501(h); (Requirements for Pass-Through Entities). The criteria for monitoring subrecipients of federal awards should be following federal regulations, the terms of the federal contract, and any additional requirements specified by the auditee's policies and procedures. Specifically, the monitoring criteria should include, but not be limited to, the following: • Subrecipient Risk Assessment • Financial Monitoring • Compliance Monitoring • Reporting and Documentation Condition The auditee failed to comply with federal regulations requiring the monitoring of subrecipients for federal awards on a timely basis. Recipients of federal awards are responsible for monitoring the activities of subrecipients to ensure that they comply with applicable laws, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. CUAHSI did not complete the monitoring of its 2023 subrecipients until 2024. During the year ended December 31, 2023, CUAHSI had $627,464 in amounts paid to subrecipients. Based on our testing of amounts paid to subrecipients, no amounts were identified as unallowable. Cause & Context CUAHSI had a policy and procedure manual in place which outlined the steps for monitoring. There was no audit evidence of CUAHSI following the policy and monitoring that the subrecipient was using the funding as prescribed during the year ended December 31, 2023. Effect CUAHSI’s lack of monitoring creates a significant risk of the possible misuse or improper use of funds. Questioned Costs None Prior Year Audit Finding Yes, previously reported as MW2022-005. Recommendation The auditor recommends that management review the requirements documented in 31 USC 7502(f)(2), 2 CFR sections 200.330, .331, and .501(h);(Requirements for Pass-Through Entities) and develops and implements procedures to adhere to such requirements. View of Responsible Official and Planned Corrective Action See accompanying Corrective Action Plan.
2023-002 GRANT REPORTING U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development ALN 14.228 – Community Development Block Grants Contract No. IR052 (2022) Passed through the Florida Department of Commerce Criteria: Section (8) of the agreement with the Florida Department of Commerce (DOC), formerly referred to as the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity (DEO), specifies requirements for the submission of monthly, quarterly and administrative reports and other required information. These reports are detailed in Attachment G to the agreement. Section (18) of the agreement with the DOC requires the City to comply with procurement standards in 2 CFR Section 200.318 – 200.327 and Section 200.330. The agreement further requires the City to provide the DOC copies of all proposed procurement documents for their review and approval prior to the obligation or disbursement of any funds (except for administrative expenses). 2 CFR 200.303(a) requires non-Federal entities to establish and maintain effective internal controls over compliance with laws and regulations applicable to Federal funding. Condition: The Audit Certification Memo for fiscal year 2022 (due June 30, 2023) and the Section 3 Summary Report (due July 31, 2023) were not filed with the DOC. Further, the Contract and Subcontract Activity report (due on April 15, 2023) was not filed timely (filed September 7, 2023). With regards to the reimbursement request, the initial reporting was rejected due to noncompliance with procurement provisions in the grant agreement. As a result, the DOC denied $74,813 of the City’s request as ineligible expenditures. Cause of condition: The City did not have effective controls in place to ensure that all required reports were submitted on a timely basis to the DOC; nor were effective controls in place to ensure that only vendors that had been procured in accordance with the provisions of the grant agreement were included in the reimbursement request. Potential effect of condition: The City is not in compliance with the reporting requirements set forth by the grantor, nor with the procurement requirements set forth in the contract. Perspective: The City has been in communication with the DOC regarding the Section 3 requirements to assist the City and its contractor to better understand the qualitative efforts needed for hiring and recruitment of Section 3 workers. These communications have been documented on the monthly progress reports submitted to the DOC. Further, the City is in the process of negotiating an amendment to the grantor agreement. An unexecuted draft of this agreement includes language that removes the requirement for the City to file semi-annual Contract and Subcontract Activity forms, replacing them with a close-out report due at completion of the project. The proposed amendment also includes language that will require the Section 3 Summary Report to be filed quarterly rather than annually. With regards to the reimbursement request, the City resubmitted the reimbursement request subsequent to year-end to exclude the vendor identified as ineligible by the DOC. The expenditures reported on the 2023 SEFA were adjusted to reflect only eligible expenditures. Questioned costs: None. Recommendation: The City should review and revise, as needed, its current control structure over grant reporting to ensure that all required reports are prepared, independently reviewed and remitted to the grantor on a timely basis. Once the City obtains an executed amendment to the agreement, the City should update its controls to ensure the changes to the grant reporting are incorporated into their procedures. While reviewing grant agreements prior to being signed, the program manager should coordinate with the Finance Department to ensure that the City has controls in place over compliance with procurement provisions contained in the grant agreement. Management’s Response: The City has filled a position focused mainly on projects and grants reporting. The employee will verify all grant requirements are fulfilled on time and according to the grant contract. Processes are being put in place that will include conversations with the project manager which will ensure they are notified of the necessary steps to fulfill the requirements, as well as final Finance review to ensure compliance.
2023-002 – COVID 19: Community Development Block Grants/Entitlement Grants Federal Awarding Agency – U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Assistance Listing Number – 14.218 FAIN – B-20-UW-12-0017 & B-21-UC-12-0017 Award Year – 2021 & 2022 Questioned costs – none Criteria: 2 CFR Part 200 in general and 2 CFR section 200.303(a) require non-Federal entities to establish and maintain effective internal controls over Federal awards, including the requirements for allowable costs, cost principles, period of performance, and special tests and provisions – wage rate requirements. The related compliance requirements are set in 24 CFR Part 570 Subpart D and sections 570.200 through .710, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act, the April 30, 2021 Quick Guide, CDBG-CV PPR Tieback Flexibilities, Title I of the Housing Community Development Act (HCDA) of 1974, as amended (Pub. L. No. 93-383) (42 USC 5301), 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart E, Appendices III-V11, and sections 200.330, .331, and .501(h), 31 USC 1552, Section III.B.7 of CDBG-CV Notice, Section 110(a) of the HCD Act, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition: Internal controls related to review of certain invoices, including construction payments and payments to subrecipients, did not have evidence of all required approvals necessary to ensure compliance with allowable costs, cost principles, and period of performance requirements or such approvals were not documented in a manner that is reperformable. Weekly payroll reports were not reviewed as part of the special tests and provisions – wage rate requirements compliance requirement, resulting in material noncompliance. Cause: Internal controls over certain payments, including payments requiring review of contractor and subcontractor wage rates were not evidenced with clear documentation. Effect: Allowable costs, cost principles, and period of performance compliance requirements may not be met due to lack of reperformable internal controls. Wage rate requirements were not complied with. Recommendation: We recommend that the City ensure wage rate requirement compliance is prioritized when applicable. We recommend that the City ensure that all controls for grants be documented in written procedures which should include the name or title of the positions responsible for each control (preparation, review, reconciliation, etc.) and that the performance of the controls be documented in a clear, reperformable manner including the name and date of each responsible individual and which specific control they performed over compliance for the grant.
Criteria: The requirements for subrecipient monitoring for subawards are contained in 31 USC 7502(f)(2) (Single Audit Act Amendments of 1996 (Pub. L. No. 104-156)), 2 CFR sections 200.330, .331, and .501(h); federal awarding agency regulations; and the terms and conditions of awards. Condition: Monitoring activities performed by the County did not encompass certain areas necessary to ensure that the subrecipient administered the subaward in compliance with the terms and conditions of the subaward. Specifically, the County had not verified that a subrecipient that was expected to be audited as required by 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart F, met this requirement (2 CFR section 200.331(f)). Cause/Effect: The County did not have adequate procedures in place for monitoring that a subrecipient had complied with federal regulations. Auditor's Recommendation: The County should review the monitoring plan related to the program to ensure these procedures are done timely and meet the federal requirements for monitoring subrecipients. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The County will review the monitoring plan related to the program and ensure these procedures are done timely and meet the federal requirements for monitoring subrecipients.
Criteria: The requirements for subrecipient monitoring for subawards are contained in 31 USC 7502(f)(2) (Single Audit Act Amendments of 1996 (Pub. L. No. 104-156)), 2 CFR sections 200.330, .331, and .501(h); federal awarding agency regulations; and the terms and conditions of awards. Condition: Monitoring activities performed by the County did not encompass certain areas necessary to ensure that the subrecipient administered the subaward in compliance with the terms and conditions of the subaward. Specifically, the County had not verified that a subrecipient that was expected to be audited as required by 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart F, met this requirement (2 CFR section 200.331(f)). Cause/Effect: The County did not have adequate procedures in place for monitoring that a subrecipient had complied with federal regulations. Auditor's Recommendation: The County should review the monitoring plan related to the program to ensure these procedures are done timely and meet the federal requirements for monitoring subrecipients. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The County will review the monitoring plan related to the program and ensure these procedures are done timely and meet the federal requirements for monitoring subrecipients.
2023-002 GRANT REPORTING U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development ALN 14.228 – Community Development Block Grants Contract No. IR052 (2022) Passed through the Florida Department of Commerce Criteria: Section (8) of the agreement with the Florida Department of Commerce (DOC), formerly referred to as the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity (DEO), specifies requirements for the submission of monthly, quarterly and administrative reports and other required information. These reports are detailed in Attachment G to the agreement. Section (18) of the agreement with the DOC requires the City to comply with procurement standards in 2 CFR Section 200.318 – 200.327 and Section 200.330. The agreement further requires the City to provide the DOC copies of all proposed procurement documents for their review and approval prior to the obligation or disbursement of any funds (except for administrative expenses). 2 CFR 200.303(a) requires non-Federal entities to establish and maintain effective internal controls over compliance with laws and regulations applicable to Federal funding. Condition: The Audit Certification Memo for fiscal year 2022 (due June 30, 2023) and the Section 3 Summary Report (due July 31, 2023) were not filed with the DOC. Further, the Contract and Subcontract Activity report (due on April 15, 2023) was not filed timely (filed September 7, 2023). With regards to the reimbursement request, the initial reporting was rejected due to noncompliance with procurement provisions in the grant agreement. As a result, the DOC denied $74,813 of the City’s request as ineligible expenditures. Cause of condition: The City did not have effective controls in place to ensure that all required reports were submitted on a timely basis to the DOC; nor were effective controls in place to ensure that only vendors that had been procured in accordance with the provisions of the grant agreement were included in the reimbursement request. Potential effect of condition: The City is not in compliance with the reporting requirements set forth by the grantor, nor with the procurement requirements set forth in the contract. Perspective: The City has been in communication with the DOC regarding the Section 3 requirements to assist the City and its contractor to better understand the qualitative efforts needed for hiring and recruitment of Section 3 workers. These communications have been documented on the monthly progress reports submitted to the DOC. Further, the City is in the process of negotiating an amendment to the grantor agreement. An unexecuted draft of this agreement includes language that removes the requirement for the City to file semi-annual Contract and Subcontract Activity forms, replacing them with a close-out report due at completion of the project. The proposed amendment also includes language that will require the Section 3 Summary Report to be filed quarterly rather than annually. With regards to the reimbursement request, the City resubmitted the reimbursement request subsequent to year-end to exclude the vendor identified as ineligible by the DOC. The expenditures reported on the 2023 SEFA were adjusted to reflect only eligible expenditures. Questioned costs: None. Recommendation: The City should review and revise, as needed, its current control structure over grant reporting to ensure that all required reports are prepared, independently reviewed and remitted to the grantor on a timely basis. Once the City obtains an executed amendment to the agreement, the City should update its controls to ensure the changes to the grant reporting are incorporated into their procedures. While reviewing grant agreements prior to being signed, the program manager should coordinate with the Finance Department to ensure that the City has controls in place over compliance with procurement provisions contained in the grant agreement. Management’s Response: The City has filled a position focused mainly on projects and grants reporting. The employee will verify all grant requirements are fulfilled on time and according to the grant contract. Processes are being put in place that will include conversations with the project manager which will ensure they are notified of the necessary steps to fulfill the requirements, as well as final Finance review to ensure compliance.
2023-002 – COVID 19: Community Development Block Grants/Entitlement Grants Federal Awarding Agency – U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Assistance Listing Number – 14.218 FAIN – B-20-UW-12-0017 & B-21-UC-12-0017 Award Year – 2021 & 2022 Questioned costs – none Criteria: 2 CFR Part 200 in general and 2 CFR section 200.303(a) require non-Federal entities to establish and maintain effective internal controls over Federal awards, including the requirements for allowable costs, cost principles, period of performance, and special tests and provisions – wage rate requirements. The related compliance requirements are set in 24 CFR Part 570 Subpart D and sections 570.200 through .710, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act, the April 30, 2021 Quick Guide, CDBG-CV PPR Tieback Flexibilities, Title I of the Housing Community Development Act (HCDA) of 1974, as amended (Pub. L. No. 93-383) (42 USC 5301), 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart E, Appendices III-V11, and sections 200.330, .331, and .501(h), 31 USC 1552, Section III.B.7 of CDBG-CV Notice, Section 110(a) of the HCD Act, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition: Internal controls related to review of certain invoices, including construction payments and payments to subrecipients, did not have evidence of all required approvals necessary to ensure compliance with allowable costs, cost principles, and period of performance requirements or such approvals were not documented in a manner that is reperformable. Weekly payroll reports were not reviewed as part of the special tests and provisions – wage rate requirements compliance requirement, resulting in material noncompliance. Cause: Internal controls over certain payments, including payments requiring review of contractor and subcontractor wage rates were not evidenced with clear documentation. Effect: Allowable costs, cost principles, and period of performance compliance requirements may not be met due to lack of reperformable internal controls. Wage rate requirements were not complied with. Recommendation: We recommend that the City ensure wage rate requirement compliance is prioritized when applicable. We recommend that the City ensure that all controls for grants be documented in written procedures which should include the name or title of the positions responsible for each control (preparation, review, reconciliation, etc.) and that the performance of the controls be documented in a clear, reperformable manner including the name and date of each responsible individual and which specific control they performed over compliance for the grant.
Criteria: The requirements for subrecipient monitoring for subawards are contained in 31 USC 7502(f)(2) (Single Audit Act Amendments of 1996 (Pub. L. No. 104-156)), 2 CFR sections 200.330, .331, and .501(h); federal awarding agency regulations; and the terms and conditions of awards. Condition: Monitoring activities performed by the County did not encompass certain areas necessary to ensure that the subrecipient administered the subaward in compliance with the terms and conditions of the subaward. Specifically, the County had not verified that a subrecipient that was expected to be audited as required by 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart F, met this requirement (2 CFR section 200.331(f)). Cause/Effect: The County did not have adequate procedures in place for monitoring that a subrecipient had complied with federal regulations. Auditor's Recommendation: The County should review the monitoring plan related to the program to ensure these procedures are done timely and meet the federal requirements for monitoring subrecipients. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The County will review the monitoring plan related to the program and ensure these procedures are done timely and meet the federal requirements for monitoring subrecipients.
Criteria: The requirements for subrecipient monitoring for subawards are contained in 31 USC 7502(f)(2) (Single Audit Act Amendments of 1996 (Pub. L. No. 104-156)), 2 CFR sections 200.330, .331, and .501(h); federal awarding agency regulations; and the terms and conditions of awards. Condition: Monitoring activities performed by the County did not encompass certain areas necessary to ensure that the subrecipient administered the subaward in compliance with the terms and conditions of the subaward. Specifically, the County had not verified that a subrecipient that was expected to be audited as required by 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart F, met this requirement (2 CFR section 200.331(f)). Cause/Effect: The County did not have adequate procedures in place for monitoring that a subrecipient had complied with federal regulations. Auditor's Recommendation: The County should review the monitoring plan related to the program to ensure these procedures are done timely and meet the federal requirements for monitoring subrecipients. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The County will review the monitoring plan related to the program and ensure these procedures are done timely and meet the federal requirements for monitoring subrecipients.
Criteria: The requirements for subrecipient monitoring for subawards are contained in 31 USC 7502(f)(2) (Single Audit Act Amendments of 1996 (Pub. L. No. 104-156)), 2 CFR sections 200.330, .331, and .501(h); federal awarding agency regulations; and the terms and conditions of awards. Condition: Monitoring activities performed by the Board did not encompass certain areas necessary to ensure that the subaward complied with the terms and conditions of the subaward and achieved performance goals (2 CFR sections 200.332(d) through (f)). Specifically, reporting of performance results by the subrecipient were not submitted to the Board as required under the terms of the contract. Cause/Effect: The Board did not have adequate procedures in place for determining that the subrecipient had complied with federal regulations and had achieved performance goals. Auditor's Recommendation: The Board should review the monitoring plan related to subrecipients to ensure the Board has met the federal requirements for monitoring subrecipients. Management Response: The Board agrees with this recommendation and will review monitoring procedures relating to subrecipients.
Item: 2023-002 Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Programs: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF) Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Pass-Through Agencies: State of Arizona, Office of the Governor Pass-Through Grantor Identifying Number: EL9HZNBAN1B9 Award Year: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Compliance Requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR sections 200.330, .331, and .501(h), pass-through entities must (a) identify the award and applicable requirements, (b) evaluate the subrecipient’s risk of noncompliance for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring related to the subaward (2 CR section 200.332(b), (c) monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward, and achieves performance goals (2 CFR section 200.332(d) through (f), and (d) ensure accountability for any for-profit subrecipients. Condition: In connection with our testing of Arizona Foundation for Human Service Providers (the Foundation) subrecipient monitoring, we noted that the Foundation did not timely or effectively monitor the activities of subrecipients post-payment to ensure that the subawards were used for authorized purposes and complied with the terms and conditions of the subaward. Questioned Costs: N/A Context: In a population of 58 subrecipients, we conducted a nonstatistical sample of 9 subrecipients to assess the Foundation’s compliance with subrecipient monitoring. In all instances, we noted the Foundation did not obtain and review monitoring reports in a timely fashion. For 2 of 9 subrecipients, we noted monitoring activities were not effective as it was determined that the subrecipients expended funds under the subaward on activities that were not part of their original approved action plan. However, we noted the activities reported were still allowable under the subaward but were not in accordance with the sub awardees originally communicated funding use plan. Effect: Subrecipients were not timely or effectively monitored post-payment to ensure that the subawards were used for authorized purposes and complied with the terms and conditions of the subaward. This is deemed to be a material weakness in internal control on compliance. Cause: The Foundation did not have sufficient controls in place to timely or effectively monitor subrecipients. Additionally, the Foundation did not have sufficient procedures for the ongoing post-payment review of subawards. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Not a repeat finding Recommendation: We recommend that the Foundation enhance their existing policies and procedures to ensure sufficient controls are in place to properly monitor subrecipients. This should include specific enhancements to the ongoing post-payment review of subawards and well as supervision and review controls to ensure the procedures are performed in a timely and thorough manner. Views of Responsible Officials: Management of the Foundation concurs in part with the finding. See Corrective Action Plan.
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) AL No. 14.241 Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS Material Weakness in Internal Controls and Noncompliance over Subrecipient Monitoring Repeat Finding: Yes; 2022-010 Condition: For 3 out of 3 selections, the Federal award identification number (FAIN) and the subrecipient's unique entity identifier (UEI) were not disclosed on the subaward. For 3 out of 3 selections, there was no evidence that the prior year Single Audit Report was reviewed. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR §200.303: The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non- Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Pursuant to 31 USC 7502(f)(2) (Single Audit Act Amendments of 1996 (Pub. L. No. 104-156)), 2 CFR sections 200.330, .331, and .501(h), a pass-through entity must identify the award and applicable requirements, evaluate risk, monitor, and ensure accountability of subrecipients. In accordance with 2 CFR §25.300: (a) A recipient may not make a subaward to a subrecipient unless that subrecipient has obtained and provided to the recipient a unique entity identifier. Subrecipients are not required to complete full SAM registration to obtain a unique entity identifier. (b) A recipient must notify any potential subrecipients that the recipient cannot make a subaward unless the subrecipient has obtained a unique entity identifier as described in paragraph (a) of this section. According to 2 CFR §200.332, all pass-through entities must: (a) Ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the Federal award identification including the subrecipient's unique entity identifier, Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN), identification of whether the award is R&D and indirect cost rate for the Federal award. (b) Evaluate each subrecipient's risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring described in paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section, which may include consideration of such factors as: (1) The subrecipient's prior experience with the same or similar subawards; (2) The results of previous audits including whether or not the subrecipient receives a Single Audit. (c) Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved. (e) Verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by 2 CFR § 200.331 when it is expected that the subrecipient's Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in § 200.501. Cause: The Mayor’s Office of Homeless Services (MOHS) did not maintain adequate documentation of the requirements included in Uniform Guidance related to procedures required for subrecipient monitoring. Effect: MOHS was not in compliance with Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend that MOHS establish and implement controls for the program and prepare and maintain a written plan to perform risk assessments on potential subrecipients. Additionally, we recommend that MOHS provides training on the Uniform Guidance requirements related to subrecipient monitoring. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) AL No. 14.241 Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS Material Weakness in Internal Controls and Noncompliance over Subrecipient Monitoring Repeat Finding: Yes; 2022-010 Condition: For 3 out of 3 selections, the Federal award identification number (FAIN) and the subrecipient's unique entity identifier (UEI) were not disclosed on the subaward. For 3 out of 3 selections, there was no evidence that the prior year Single Audit Report was reviewed. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR §200.303: The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non- Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Pursuant to 31 USC 7502(f)(2) (Single Audit Act Amendments of 1996 (Pub. L. No. 104-156)), 2 CFR sections 200.330, .331, and .501(h), a pass-through entity must identify the award and applicable requirements, evaluate risk, monitor, and ensure accountability of subrecipients. In accordance with 2 CFR §25.300: (a) A recipient may not make a subaward to a subrecipient unless that subrecipient has obtained and provided to the recipient a unique entity identifier. Subrecipients are not required to complete full SAM registration to obtain a unique entity identifier. (b) A recipient must notify any potential subrecipients that the recipient cannot make a subaward unless the subrecipient has obtained a unique entity identifier as described in paragraph (a) of this section. According to 2 CFR §200.332, all pass-through entities must: (a) Ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the Federal award identification including the subrecipient's unique entity identifier, Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN), identification of whether the award is R&D and indirect cost rate for the Federal award. (b) Evaluate each subrecipient's risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring described in paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section, which may include consideration of such factors as: (1) The subrecipient's prior experience with the same or similar subawards; (2) The results of previous audits including whether or not the subrecipient receives a Single Audit. (c) Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved. (e) Verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by 2 CFR § 200.331 when it is expected that the subrecipient's Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in § 200.501. Cause: The Mayor’s Office of Homeless Services (MOHS) did not maintain adequate documentation of the requirements included in Uniform Guidance related to procedures required for subrecipient monitoring. Effect: MOHS was not in compliance with Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend that MOHS establish and implement controls for the program and prepare and maintain a written plan to perform risk assessments on potential subrecipients. Additionally, we recommend that MOHS provides training on the Uniform Guidance requirements related to subrecipient monitoring. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) AL No. 14.241 Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS Material Weakness in Internal Controls and Noncompliance over Subrecipient Monitoring Repeat Finding: Yes; 2022-010 Condition: For 3 out of 3 selections, the Federal award identification number (FAIN) and the subrecipient's unique entity identifier (UEI) were not disclosed on the subaward. For 3 out of 3 selections, there was no evidence that the prior year Single Audit Report was reviewed. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR §200.303: The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non- Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Pursuant to 31 USC 7502(f)(2) (Single Audit Act Amendments of 1996 (Pub. L. No. 104-156)), 2 CFR sections 200.330, .331, and .501(h), a pass-through entity must identify the award and applicable requirements, evaluate risk, monitor, and ensure accountability of subrecipients. In accordance with 2 CFR §25.300: (a) A recipient may not make a subaward to a subrecipient unless that subrecipient has obtained and provided to the recipient a unique entity identifier. Subrecipients are not required to complete full SAM registration to obtain a unique entity identifier. (b) A recipient must notify any potential subrecipients that the recipient cannot make a subaward unless the subrecipient has obtained a unique entity identifier as described in paragraph (a) of this section. According to 2 CFR §200.332, all pass-through entities must: (a) Ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the Federal award identification including the subrecipient's unique entity identifier, Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN), identification of whether the award is R&D and indirect cost rate for the Federal award. (b) Evaluate each subrecipient's risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring described in paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section, which may include consideration of such factors as: (1) The subrecipient's prior experience with the same or similar subawards; (2) The results of previous audits including whether or not the subrecipient receives a Single Audit. (c) Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved. (e) Verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by 2 CFR § 200.331 when it is expected that the subrecipient's Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in § 200.501. Cause: The Mayor’s Office of Homeless Services (MOHS) did not maintain adequate documentation of the requirements included in Uniform Guidance related to procedures required for subrecipient monitoring. Effect: MOHS was not in compliance with Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend that MOHS establish and implement controls for the program and prepare and maintain a written plan to perform risk assessments on potential subrecipients. Additionally, we recommend that MOHS provides training on the Uniform Guidance requirements related to subrecipient monitoring. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) AL No. 14.241 Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS Material Weakness in Internal Controls and Noncompliance over Subrecipient Monitoring Repeat Finding: Yes; 2022-010 Condition: For 3 out of 3 selections, the Federal award identification number (FAIN) and the subrecipient's unique entity identifier (UEI) were not disclosed on the subaward. For 3 out of 3 selections, there was no evidence that the prior year Single Audit Report was reviewed. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR §200.303: The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non- Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Pursuant to 31 USC 7502(f)(2) (Single Audit Act Amendments of 1996 (Pub. L. No. 104-156)), 2 CFR sections 200.330, .331, and .501(h), a pass-through entity must identify the award and applicable requirements, evaluate risk, monitor, and ensure accountability of subrecipients. In accordance with 2 CFR §25.300: (a) A recipient may not make a subaward to a subrecipient unless that subrecipient has obtained and provided to the recipient a unique entity identifier. Subrecipients are not required to complete full SAM registration to obtain a unique entity identifier. (b) A recipient must notify any potential subrecipients that the recipient cannot make a subaward unless the subrecipient has obtained a unique entity identifier as described in paragraph (a) of this section. According to 2 CFR §200.332, all pass-through entities must: (a) Ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the Federal award identification including the subrecipient's unique entity identifier, Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN), identification of whether the award is R&D and indirect cost rate for the Federal award. (b) Evaluate each subrecipient's risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring described in paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section, which may include consideration of such factors as: (1) The subrecipient's prior experience with the same or similar subawards; (2) The results of previous audits including whether or not the subrecipient receives a Single Audit. (c) Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved. (e) Verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by 2 CFR § 200.331 when it is expected that the subrecipient's Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in § 200.501. Cause: The Mayor’s Office of Homeless Services (MOHS) did not maintain adequate documentation of the requirements included in Uniform Guidance related to procedures required for subrecipient monitoring. Effect: MOHS was not in compliance with Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend that MOHS establish and implement controls for the program and prepare and maintain a written plan to perform risk assessments on potential subrecipients. Additionally, we recommend that MOHS provides training on the Uniform Guidance requirements related to subrecipient monitoring. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) AL No. 14.241 Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS Material Weakness in Internal Controls and Noncompliance over Subrecipient Monitoring Repeat Finding: Yes; 2022-010 Condition: For 3 out of 3 selections, the Federal award identification number (FAIN) and the subrecipient's unique entity identifier (UEI) were not disclosed on the subaward. For 3 out of 3 selections, there was no evidence that the prior year Single Audit Report was reviewed. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR §200.303: The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non- Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Pursuant to 31 USC 7502(f)(2) (Single Audit Act Amendments of 1996 (Pub. L. No. 104-156)), 2 CFR sections 200.330, .331, and .501(h), a pass-through entity must identify the award and applicable requirements, evaluate risk, monitor, and ensure accountability of subrecipients. In accordance with 2 CFR §25.300: (a) A recipient may not make a subaward to a subrecipient unless that subrecipient has obtained and provided to the recipient a unique entity identifier. Subrecipients are not required to complete full SAM registration to obtain a unique entity identifier. (b) A recipient must notify any potential subrecipients that the recipient cannot make a subaward unless the subrecipient has obtained a unique entity identifier as described in paragraph (a) of this section. According to 2 CFR §200.332, all pass-through entities must: (a) Ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the Federal award identification including the subrecipient's unique entity identifier, Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN), identification of whether the award is R&D and indirect cost rate for the Federal award. (b) Evaluate each subrecipient's risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring described in paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section, which may include consideration of such factors as: (1) The subrecipient's prior experience with the same or similar subawards; (2) The results of previous audits including whether or not the subrecipient receives a Single Audit. (c) Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved. (e) Verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by 2 CFR § 200.331 when it is expected that the subrecipient's Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in § 200.501. Cause: The Mayor’s Office of Homeless Services (MOHS) did not maintain adequate documentation of the requirements included in Uniform Guidance related to procedures required for subrecipient monitoring. Effect: MOHS was not in compliance with Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend that MOHS establish and implement controls for the program and prepare and maintain a written plan to perform risk assessments on potential subrecipients. Additionally, we recommend that MOHS provides training on the Uniform Guidance requirements related to subrecipient monitoring. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) AL No. 14.241 Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS Material Weakness in Internal Controls and Noncompliance over Subrecipient Monitoring Repeat Finding: Yes; 2022-010 Condition: For 3 out of 3 selections, the Federal award identification number (FAIN) and the subrecipient's unique entity identifier (UEI) were not disclosed on the subaward. For 3 out of 3 selections, there was no evidence that the prior year Single Audit Report was reviewed. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR §200.303: The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non- Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Pursuant to 31 USC 7502(f)(2) (Single Audit Act Amendments of 1996 (Pub. L. No. 104-156)), 2 CFR sections 200.330, .331, and .501(h), a pass-through entity must identify the award and applicable requirements, evaluate risk, monitor, and ensure accountability of subrecipients. In accordance with 2 CFR §25.300: (a) A recipient may not make a subaward to a subrecipient unless that subrecipient has obtained and provided to the recipient a unique entity identifier. Subrecipients are not required to complete full SAM registration to obtain a unique entity identifier. (b) A recipient must notify any potential subrecipients that the recipient cannot make a subaward unless the subrecipient has obtained a unique entity identifier as described in paragraph (a) of this section. According to 2 CFR §200.332, all pass-through entities must: (a) Ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the Federal award identification including the subrecipient's unique entity identifier, Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN), identification of whether the award is R&D and indirect cost rate for the Federal award. (b) Evaluate each subrecipient's risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring described in paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section, which may include consideration of such factors as: (1) The subrecipient's prior experience with the same or similar subawards; (2) The results of previous audits including whether or not the subrecipient receives a Single Audit. (c) Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved. (e) Verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by 2 CFR § 200.331 when it is expected that the subrecipient's Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in § 200.501. Cause: The Mayor’s Office of Homeless Services (MOHS) did not maintain adequate documentation of the requirements included in Uniform Guidance related to procedures required for subrecipient monitoring. Effect: MOHS was not in compliance with Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend that MOHS establish and implement controls for the program and prepare and maintain a written plan to perform risk assessments on potential subrecipients. Additionally, we recommend that MOHS provides training on the Uniform Guidance requirements related to subrecipient monitoring. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) AL No. 14.241 Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS Material Weakness in Internal Controls and Noncompliance over Subrecipient Monitoring Repeat Finding: Yes; 2022-010 Condition: For 3 out of 3 selections, the Federal award identification number (FAIN) and the subrecipient's unique entity identifier (UEI) were not disclosed on the subaward. For 3 out of 3 selections, there was no evidence that the prior year Single Audit Report was reviewed. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR §200.303: The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non- Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Pursuant to 31 USC 7502(f)(2) (Single Audit Act Amendments of 1996 (Pub. L. No. 104-156)), 2 CFR sections 200.330, .331, and .501(h), a pass-through entity must identify the award and applicable requirements, evaluate risk, monitor, and ensure accountability of subrecipients. In accordance with 2 CFR §25.300: (a) A recipient may not make a subaward to a subrecipient unless that subrecipient has obtained and provided to the recipient a unique entity identifier. Subrecipients are not required to complete full SAM registration to obtain a unique entity identifier. (b) A recipient must notify any potential subrecipients that the recipient cannot make a subaward unless the subrecipient has obtained a unique entity identifier as described in paragraph (a) of this section. According to 2 CFR §200.332, all pass-through entities must: (a) Ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the Federal award identification including the subrecipient's unique entity identifier, Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN), identification of whether the award is R&D and indirect cost rate for the Federal award. (b) Evaluate each subrecipient's risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring described in paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section, which may include consideration of such factors as: (1) The subrecipient's prior experience with the same or similar subawards; (2) The results of previous audits including whether or not the subrecipient receives a Single Audit. (c) Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved. (e) Verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by 2 CFR § 200.331 when it is expected that the subrecipient's Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in § 200.501. Cause: The Mayor’s Office of Homeless Services (MOHS) did not maintain adequate documentation of the requirements included in Uniform Guidance related to procedures required for subrecipient monitoring. Effect: MOHS was not in compliance with Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend that MOHS establish and implement controls for the program and prepare and maintain a written plan to perform risk assessments on potential subrecipients. Additionally, we recommend that MOHS provides training on the Uniform Guidance requirements related to subrecipient monitoring. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) AL No. 14.241 Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS Material Weakness in Internal Controls and Noncompliance over Subrecipient Monitoring Repeat Finding: Yes; 2022-010 Condition: For 3 out of 3 selections, the Federal award identification number (FAIN) and the subrecipient's unique entity identifier (UEI) were not disclosed on the subaward. For 3 out of 3 selections, there was no evidence that the prior year Single Audit Report was reviewed. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR §200.303: The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non- Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Pursuant to 31 USC 7502(f)(2) (Single Audit Act Amendments of 1996 (Pub. L. No. 104-156)), 2 CFR sections 200.330, .331, and .501(h), a pass-through entity must identify the award and applicable requirements, evaluate risk, monitor, and ensure accountability of subrecipients. In accordance with 2 CFR §25.300: (a) A recipient may not make a subaward to a subrecipient unless that subrecipient has obtained and provided to the recipient a unique entity identifier. Subrecipients are not required to complete full SAM registration to obtain a unique entity identifier. (b) A recipient must notify any potential subrecipients that the recipient cannot make a subaward unless the subrecipient has obtained a unique entity identifier as described in paragraph (a) of this section. According to 2 CFR §200.332, all pass-through entities must: (a) Ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the Federal award identification including the subrecipient's unique entity identifier, Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN), identification of whether the award is R&D and indirect cost rate for the Federal award. (b) Evaluate each subrecipient's risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring described in paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section, which may include consideration of such factors as: (1) The subrecipient's prior experience with the same or similar subawards; (2) The results of previous audits including whether or not the subrecipient receives a Single Audit. (c) Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved. (e) Verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by 2 CFR § 200.331 when it is expected that the subrecipient's Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in § 200.501. Cause: The Mayor’s Office of Homeless Services (MOHS) did not maintain adequate documentation of the requirements included in Uniform Guidance related to procedures required for subrecipient monitoring. Effect: MOHS was not in compliance with Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend that MOHS establish and implement controls for the program and prepare and maintain a written plan to perform risk assessments on potential subrecipients. Additionally, we recommend that MOHS provides training on the Uniform Guidance requirements related to subrecipient monitoring. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) AL No. 14.241 Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS Material Weakness in Internal Controls and Noncompliance over Subrecipient Monitoring Repeat Finding: Yes; 2022-010 Condition: For 3 out of 3 selections, the Federal award identification number (FAIN) and the subrecipient's unique entity identifier (UEI) were not disclosed on the subaward. For 3 out of 3 selections, there was no evidence that the prior year Single Audit Report was reviewed. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR §200.303: The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non- Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Pursuant to 31 USC 7502(f)(2) (Single Audit Act Amendments of 1996 (Pub. L. No. 104-156)), 2 CFR sections 200.330, .331, and .501(h), a pass-through entity must identify the award and applicable requirements, evaluate risk, monitor, and ensure accountability of subrecipients. In accordance with 2 CFR §25.300: (a) A recipient may not make a subaward to a subrecipient unless that subrecipient has obtained and provided to the recipient a unique entity identifier. Subrecipients are not required to complete full SAM registration to obtain a unique entity identifier. (b) A recipient must notify any potential subrecipients that the recipient cannot make a subaward unless the subrecipient has obtained a unique entity identifier as described in paragraph (a) of this section. According to 2 CFR §200.332, all pass-through entities must: (a) Ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the Federal award identification including the subrecipient's unique entity identifier, Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN), identification of whether the award is R&D and indirect cost rate for the Federal award. (b) Evaluate each subrecipient's risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring described in paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section, which may include consideration of such factors as: (1) The subrecipient's prior experience with the same or similar subawards; (2) The results of previous audits including whether or not the subrecipient receives a Single Audit. (c) Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved. (e) Verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by 2 CFR § 200.331 when it is expected that the subrecipient's Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in § 200.501. Cause: The Mayor’s Office of Homeless Services (MOHS) did not maintain adequate documentation of the requirements included in Uniform Guidance related to procedures required for subrecipient monitoring. Effect: MOHS was not in compliance with Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend that MOHS establish and implement controls for the program and prepare and maintain a written plan to perform risk assessments on potential subrecipients. Additionally, we recommend that MOHS provides training on the Uniform Guidance requirements related to subrecipient monitoring. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated
Criteria: The requirements for subrecipient monitoring for subawards are contained in 31 USC 7502(f)(2) (Single Audit Act Amendments of 1996 (Pub. L. No. 104-156)), 2 CFR sections 200.330, .331, and .501(h); federal awarding agency regulations; and the terms and conditions of awards. Condition: Monitoring activities performed by the Board did not encompass certain areas necessary to ensure that the subaward complied with the terms and conditions of the subaward and achieved performance goals (2 CFR sections 200.332(d) through (f)). Specifically, reporting of performance results by the subrecipient were not submitted to the Board as required under the terms of the contract. Cause/Effect: The Board did not have adequate procedures in place for determining that the subrecipient had complied with federal regulations and had achieved performance goals. Auditor's Recommendation: The Board should review the monitoring plan related to subrecipients to ensure the Board has met the federal requirements for monitoring subrecipients. Management Response: The Board agrees with this recommendation and will review monitoring procedures relating to subrecipients.
Item: 2023-002 Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Programs: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF) Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Pass-Through Agencies: State of Arizona, Office of the Governor Pass-Through Grantor Identifying Number: EL9HZNBAN1B9 Award Year: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Compliance Requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR sections 200.330, .331, and .501(h), pass-through entities must (a) identify the award and applicable requirements, (b) evaluate the subrecipient’s risk of noncompliance for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring related to the subaward (2 CR section 200.332(b), (c) monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward, and achieves performance goals (2 CFR section 200.332(d) through (f), and (d) ensure accountability for any for-profit subrecipients. Condition: In connection with our testing of Arizona Foundation for Human Service Providers (the Foundation) subrecipient monitoring, we noted that the Foundation did not timely or effectively monitor the activities of subrecipients post-payment to ensure that the subawards were used for authorized purposes and complied with the terms and conditions of the subaward. Questioned Costs: N/A Context: In a population of 58 subrecipients, we conducted a nonstatistical sample of 9 subrecipients to assess the Foundation’s compliance with subrecipient monitoring. In all instances, we noted the Foundation did not obtain and review monitoring reports in a timely fashion. For 2 of 9 subrecipients, we noted monitoring activities were not effective as it was determined that the subrecipients expended funds under the subaward on activities that were not part of their original approved action plan. However, we noted the activities reported were still allowable under the subaward but were not in accordance with the sub awardees originally communicated funding use plan. Effect: Subrecipients were not timely or effectively monitored post-payment to ensure that the subawards were used for authorized purposes and complied with the terms and conditions of the subaward. This is deemed to be a material weakness in internal control on compliance. Cause: The Foundation did not have sufficient controls in place to timely or effectively monitor subrecipients. Additionally, the Foundation did not have sufficient procedures for the ongoing post-payment review of subawards. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Not a repeat finding Recommendation: We recommend that the Foundation enhance their existing policies and procedures to ensure sufficient controls are in place to properly monitor subrecipients. This should include specific enhancements to the ongoing post-payment review of subawards and well as supervision and review controls to ensure the procedures are performed in a timely and thorough manner. Views of Responsible Officials: Management of the Foundation concurs in part with the finding. See Corrective Action Plan.
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) AL No. 14.241 Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS Material Weakness in Internal Controls and Noncompliance over Subrecipient Monitoring Repeat Finding: Yes; 2022-010 Condition: For 3 out of 3 selections, the Federal award identification number (FAIN) and the subrecipient's unique entity identifier (UEI) were not disclosed on the subaward. For 3 out of 3 selections, there was no evidence that the prior year Single Audit Report was reviewed. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR §200.303: The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non- Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Pursuant to 31 USC 7502(f)(2) (Single Audit Act Amendments of 1996 (Pub. L. No. 104-156)), 2 CFR sections 200.330, .331, and .501(h), a pass-through entity must identify the award and applicable requirements, evaluate risk, monitor, and ensure accountability of subrecipients. In accordance with 2 CFR §25.300: (a) A recipient may not make a subaward to a subrecipient unless that subrecipient has obtained and provided to the recipient a unique entity identifier. Subrecipients are not required to complete full SAM registration to obtain a unique entity identifier. (b) A recipient must notify any potential subrecipients that the recipient cannot make a subaward unless the subrecipient has obtained a unique entity identifier as described in paragraph (a) of this section. According to 2 CFR §200.332, all pass-through entities must: (a) Ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the Federal award identification including the subrecipient's unique entity identifier, Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN), identification of whether the award is R&D and indirect cost rate for the Federal award. (b) Evaluate each subrecipient's risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring described in paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section, which may include consideration of such factors as: (1) The subrecipient's prior experience with the same or similar subawards; (2) The results of previous audits including whether or not the subrecipient receives a Single Audit. (c) Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved. (e) Verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by 2 CFR § 200.331 when it is expected that the subrecipient's Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in § 200.501. Cause: The Mayor’s Office of Homeless Services (MOHS) did not maintain adequate documentation of the requirements included in Uniform Guidance related to procedures required for subrecipient monitoring. Effect: MOHS was not in compliance with Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend that MOHS establish and implement controls for the program and prepare and maintain a written plan to perform risk assessments on potential subrecipients. Additionally, we recommend that MOHS provides training on the Uniform Guidance requirements related to subrecipient monitoring. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) AL No. 14.241 Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS Material Weakness in Internal Controls and Noncompliance over Subrecipient Monitoring Repeat Finding: Yes; 2022-010 Condition: For 3 out of 3 selections, the Federal award identification number (FAIN) and the subrecipient's unique entity identifier (UEI) were not disclosed on the subaward. For 3 out of 3 selections, there was no evidence that the prior year Single Audit Report was reviewed. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR §200.303: The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non- Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Pursuant to 31 USC 7502(f)(2) (Single Audit Act Amendments of 1996 (Pub. L. No. 104-156)), 2 CFR sections 200.330, .331, and .501(h), a pass-through entity must identify the award and applicable requirements, evaluate risk, monitor, and ensure accountability of subrecipients. In accordance with 2 CFR §25.300: (a) A recipient may not make a subaward to a subrecipient unless that subrecipient has obtained and provided to the recipient a unique entity identifier. Subrecipients are not required to complete full SAM registration to obtain a unique entity identifier. (b) A recipient must notify any potential subrecipients that the recipient cannot make a subaward unless the subrecipient has obtained a unique entity identifier as described in paragraph (a) of this section. According to 2 CFR §200.332, all pass-through entities must: (a) Ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the Federal award identification including the subrecipient's unique entity identifier, Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN), identification of whether the award is R&D and indirect cost rate for the Federal award. (b) Evaluate each subrecipient's risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring described in paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section, which may include consideration of such factors as: (1) The subrecipient's prior experience with the same or similar subawards; (2) The results of previous audits including whether or not the subrecipient receives a Single Audit. (c) Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved. (e) Verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by 2 CFR § 200.331 when it is expected that the subrecipient's Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in § 200.501. Cause: The Mayor’s Office of Homeless Services (MOHS) did not maintain adequate documentation of the requirements included in Uniform Guidance related to procedures required for subrecipient monitoring. Effect: MOHS was not in compliance with Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend that MOHS establish and implement controls for the program and prepare and maintain a written plan to perform risk assessments on potential subrecipients. Additionally, we recommend that MOHS provides training on the Uniform Guidance requirements related to subrecipient monitoring. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) AL No. 14.241 Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS Material Weakness in Internal Controls and Noncompliance over Subrecipient Monitoring Repeat Finding: Yes; 2022-010 Condition: For 3 out of 3 selections, the Federal award identification number (FAIN) and the subrecipient's unique entity identifier (UEI) were not disclosed on the subaward. For 3 out of 3 selections, there was no evidence that the prior year Single Audit Report was reviewed. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR §200.303: The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non- Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Pursuant to 31 USC 7502(f)(2) (Single Audit Act Amendments of 1996 (Pub. L. No. 104-156)), 2 CFR sections 200.330, .331, and .501(h), a pass-through entity must identify the award and applicable requirements, evaluate risk, monitor, and ensure accountability of subrecipients. In accordance with 2 CFR §25.300: (a) A recipient may not make a subaward to a subrecipient unless that subrecipient has obtained and provided to the recipient a unique entity identifier. Subrecipients are not required to complete full SAM registration to obtain a unique entity identifier. (b) A recipient must notify any potential subrecipients that the recipient cannot make a subaward unless the subrecipient has obtained a unique entity identifier as described in paragraph (a) of this section. According to 2 CFR §200.332, all pass-through entities must: (a) Ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the Federal award identification including the subrecipient's unique entity identifier, Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN), identification of whether the award is R&D and indirect cost rate for the Federal award. (b) Evaluate each subrecipient's risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring described in paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section, which may include consideration of such factors as: (1) The subrecipient's prior experience with the same or similar subawards; (2) The results of previous audits including whether or not the subrecipient receives a Single Audit. (c) Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved. (e) Verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by 2 CFR § 200.331 when it is expected that the subrecipient's Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in § 200.501. Cause: The Mayor’s Office of Homeless Services (MOHS) did not maintain adequate documentation of the requirements included in Uniform Guidance related to procedures required for subrecipient monitoring. Effect: MOHS was not in compliance with Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend that MOHS establish and implement controls for the program and prepare and maintain a written plan to perform risk assessments on potential subrecipients. Additionally, we recommend that MOHS provides training on the Uniform Guidance requirements related to subrecipient monitoring. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) AL No. 14.241 Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS Material Weakness in Internal Controls and Noncompliance over Subrecipient Monitoring Repeat Finding: Yes; 2022-010 Condition: For 3 out of 3 selections, the Federal award identification number (FAIN) and the subrecipient's unique entity identifier (UEI) were not disclosed on the subaward. For 3 out of 3 selections, there was no evidence that the prior year Single Audit Report was reviewed. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR §200.303: The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non- Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Pursuant to 31 USC 7502(f)(2) (Single Audit Act Amendments of 1996 (Pub. L. No. 104-156)), 2 CFR sections 200.330, .331, and .501(h), a pass-through entity must identify the award and applicable requirements, evaluate risk, monitor, and ensure accountability of subrecipients. In accordance with 2 CFR §25.300: (a) A recipient may not make a subaward to a subrecipient unless that subrecipient has obtained and provided to the recipient a unique entity identifier. Subrecipients are not required to complete full SAM registration to obtain a unique entity identifier. (b) A recipient must notify any potential subrecipients that the recipient cannot make a subaward unless the subrecipient has obtained a unique entity identifier as described in paragraph (a) of this section. According to 2 CFR §200.332, all pass-through entities must: (a) Ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the Federal award identification including the subrecipient's unique entity identifier, Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN), identification of whether the award is R&D and indirect cost rate for the Federal award. (b) Evaluate each subrecipient's risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring described in paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section, which may include consideration of such factors as: (1) The subrecipient's prior experience with the same or similar subawards; (2) The results of previous audits including whether or not the subrecipient receives a Single Audit. (c) Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved. (e) Verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by 2 CFR § 200.331 when it is expected that the subrecipient's Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in § 200.501. Cause: The Mayor’s Office of Homeless Services (MOHS) did not maintain adequate documentation of the requirements included in Uniform Guidance related to procedures required for subrecipient monitoring. Effect: MOHS was not in compliance with Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend that MOHS establish and implement controls for the program and prepare and maintain a written plan to perform risk assessments on potential subrecipients. Additionally, we recommend that MOHS provides training on the Uniform Guidance requirements related to subrecipient monitoring. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) AL No. 14.241 Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS Material Weakness in Internal Controls and Noncompliance over Subrecipient Monitoring Repeat Finding: Yes; 2022-010 Condition: For 3 out of 3 selections, the Federal award identification number (FAIN) and the subrecipient's unique entity identifier (UEI) were not disclosed on the subaward. For 3 out of 3 selections, there was no evidence that the prior year Single Audit Report was reviewed. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR §200.303: The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non- Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Pursuant to 31 USC 7502(f)(2) (Single Audit Act Amendments of 1996 (Pub. L. No. 104-156)), 2 CFR sections 200.330, .331, and .501(h), a pass-through entity must identify the award and applicable requirements, evaluate risk, monitor, and ensure accountability of subrecipients. In accordance with 2 CFR §25.300: (a) A recipient may not make a subaward to a subrecipient unless that subrecipient has obtained and provided to the recipient a unique entity identifier. Subrecipients are not required to complete full SAM registration to obtain a unique entity identifier. (b) A recipient must notify any potential subrecipients that the recipient cannot make a subaward unless the subrecipient has obtained a unique entity identifier as described in paragraph (a) of this section. According to 2 CFR §200.332, all pass-through entities must: (a) Ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the Federal award identification including the subrecipient's unique entity identifier, Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN), identification of whether the award is R&D and indirect cost rate for the Federal award. (b) Evaluate each subrecipient's risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring described in paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section, which may include consideration of such factors as: (1) The subrecipient's prior experience with the same or similar subawards; (2) The results of previous audits including whether or not the subrecipient receives a Single Audit. (c) Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved. (e) Verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by 2 CFR § 200.331 when it is expected that the subrecipient's Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in § 200.501. Cause: The Mayor’s Office of Homeless Services (MOHS) did not maintain adequate documentation of the requirements included in Uniform Guidance related to procedures required for subrecipient monitoring. Effect: MOHS was not in compliance with Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend that MOHS establish and implement controls for the program and prepare and maintain a written plan to perform risk assessments on potential subrecipients. Additionally, we recommend that MOHS provides training on the Uniform Guidance requirements related to subrecipient monitoring. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) AL No. 14.241 Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS Material Weakness in Internal Controls and Noncompliance over Subrecipient Monitoring Repeat Finding: Yes; 2022-010 Condition: For 3 out of 3 selections, the Federal award identification number (FAIN) and the subrecipient's unique entity identifier (UEI) were not disclosed on the subaward. For 3 out of 3 selections, there was no evidence that the prior year Single Audit Report was reviewed. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR §200.303: The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non- Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Pursuant to 31 USC 7502(f)(2) (Single Audit Act Amendments of 1996 (Pub. L. No. 104-156)), 2 CFR sections 200.330, .331, and .501(h), a pass-through entity must identify the award and applicable requirements, evaluate risk, monitor, and ensure accountability of subrecipients. In accordance with 2 CFR §25.300: (a) A recipient may not make a subaward to a subrecipient unless that subrecipient has obtained and provided to the recipient a unique entity identifier. Subrecipients are not required to complete full SAM registration to obtain a unique entity identifier. (b) A recipient must notify any potential subrecipients that the recipient cannot make a subaward unless the subrecipient has obtained a unique entity identifier as described in paragraph (a) of this section. According to 2 CFR §200.332, all pass-through entities must: (a) Ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the Federal award identification including the subrecipient's unique entity identifier, Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN), identification of whether the award is R&D and indirect cost rate for the Federal award. (b) Evaluate each subrecipient's risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring described in paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section, which may include consideration of such factors as: (1) The subrecipient's prior experience with the same or similar subawards; (2) The results of previous audits including whether or not the subrecipient receives a Single Audit. (c) Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved. (e) Verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by 2 CFR § 200.331 when it is expected that the subrecipient's Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in § 200.501. Cause: The Mayor’s Office of Homeless Services (MOHS) did not maintain adequate documentation of the requirements included in Uniform Guidance related to procedures required for subrecipient monitoring. Effect: MOHS was not in compliance with Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend that MOHS establish and implement controls for the program and prepare and maintain a written plan to perform risk assessments on potential subrecipients. Additionally, we recommend that MOHS provides training on the Uniform Guidance requirements related to subrecipient monitoring. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) AL No. 14.241 Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS Material Weakness in Internal Controls and Noncompliance over Subrecipient Monitoring Repeat Finding: Yes; 2022-010 Condition: For 3 out of 3 selections, the Federal award identification number (FAIN) and the subrecipient's unique entity identifier (UEI) were not disclosed on the subaward. For 3 out of 3 selections, there was no evidence that the prior year Single Audit Report was reviewed. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR §200.303: The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non- Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Pursuant to 31 USC 7502(f)(2) (Single Audit Act Amendments of 1996 (Pub. L. No. 104-156)), 2 CFR sections 200.330, .331, and .501(h), a pass-through entity must identify the award and applicable requirements, evaluate risk, monitor, and ensure accountability of subrecipients. In accordance with 2 CFR §25.300: (a) A recipient may not make a subaward to a subrecipient unless that subrecipient has obtained and provided to the recipient a unique entity identifier. Subrecipients are not required to complete full SAM registration to obtain a unique entity identifier. (b) A recipient must notify any potential subrecipients that the recipient cannot make a subaward unless the subrecipient has obtained a unique entity identifier as described in paragraph (a) of this section. According to 2 CFR §200.332, all pass-through entities must: (a) Ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the Federal award identification including the subrecipient's unique entity identifier, Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN), identification of whether the award is R&D and indirect cost rate for the Federal award. (b) Evaluate each subrecipient's risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring described in paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section, which may include consideration of such factors as: (1) The subrecipient's prior experience with the same or similar subawards; (2) The results of previous audits including whether or not the subrecipient receives a Single Audit. (c) Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved. (e) Verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by 2 CFR § 200.331 when it is expected that the subrecipient's Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in § 200.501. Cause: The Mayor’s Office of Homeless Services (MOHS) did not maintain adequate documentation of the requirements included in Uniform Guidance related to procedures required for subrecipient monitoring. Effect: MOHS was not in compliance with Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend that MOHS establish and implement controls for the program and prepare and maintain a written plan to perform risk assessments on potential subrecipients. Additionally, we recommend that MOHS provides training on the Uniform Guidance requirements related to subrecipient monitoring. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) AL No. 14.241 Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS Material Weakness in Internal Controls and Noncompliance over Subrecipient Monitoring Repeat Finding: Yes; 2022-010 Condition: For 3 out of 3 selections, the Federal award identification number (FAIN) and the subrecipient's unique entity identifier (UEI) were not disclosed on the subaward. For 3 out of 3 selections, there was no evidence that the prior year Single Audit Report was reviewed. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR §200.303: The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non- Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Pursuant to 31 USC 7502(f)(2) (Single Audit Act Amendments of 1996 (Pub. L. No. 104-156)), 2 CFR sections 200.330, .331, and .501(h), a pass-through entity must identify the award and applicable requirements, evaluate risk, monitor, and ensure accountability of subrecipients. In accordance with 2 CFR §25.300: (a) A recipient may not make a subaward to a subrecipient unless that subrecipient has obtained and provided to the recipient a unique entity identifier. Subrecipients are not required to complete full SAM registration to obtain a unique entity identifier. (b) A recipient must notify any potential subrecipients that the recipient cannot make a subaward unless the subrecipient has obtained a unique entity identifier as described in paragraph (a) of this section. According to 2 CFR §200.332, all pass-through entities must: (a) Ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the Federal award identification including the subrecipient's unique entity identifier, Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN), identification of whether the award is R&D and indirect cost rate for the Federal award. (b) Evaluate each subrecipient's risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring described in paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section, which may include consideration of such factors as: (1) The subrecipient's prior experience with the same or similar subawards; (2) The results of previous audits including whether or not the subrecipient receives a Single Audit. (c) Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved. (e) Verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by 2 CFR § 200.331 when it is expected that the subrecipient's Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in § 200.501. Cause: The Mayor’s Office of Homeless Services (MOHS) did not maintain adequate documentation of the requirements included in Uniform Guidance related to procedures required for subrecipient monitoring. Effect: MOHS was not in compliance with Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend that MOHS establish and implement controls for the program and prepare and maintain a written plan to perform risk assessments on potential subrecipients. Additionally, we recommend that MOHS provides training on the Uniform Guidance requirements related to subrecipient monitoring. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) AL No. 14.241 Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS Material Weakness in Internal Controls and Noncompliance over Subrecipient Monitoring Repeat Finding: Yes; 2022-010 Condition: For 3 out of 3 selections, the Federal award identification number (FAIN) and the subrecipient's unique entity identifier (UEI) were not disclosed on the subaward. For 3 out of 3 selections, there was no evidence that the prior year Single Audit Report was reviewed. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR §200.303: The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non- Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Pursuant to 31 USC 7502(f)(2) (Single Audit Act Amendments of 1996 (Pub. L. No. 104-156)), 2 CFR sections 200.330, .331, and .501(h), a pass-through entity must identify the award and applicable requirements, evaluate risk, monitor, and ensure accountability of subrecipients. In accordance with 2 CFR §25.300: (a) A recipient may not make a subaward to a subrecipient unless that subrecipient has obtained and provided to the recipient a unique entity identifier. Subrecipients are not required to complete full SAM registration to obtain a unique entity identifier. (b) A recipient must notify any potential subrecipients that the recipient cannot make a subaward unless the subrecipient has obtained a unique entity identifier as described in paragraph (a) of this section. According to 2 CFR §200.332, all pass-through entities must: (a) Ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the Federal award identification including the subrecipient's unique entity identifier, Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN), identification of whether the award is R&D and indirect cost rate for the Federal award. (b) Evaluate each subrecipient's risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring described in paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section, which may include consideration of such factors as: (1) The subrecipient's prior experience with the same or similar subawards; (2) The results of previous audits including whether or not the subrecipient receives a Single Audit. (c) Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved. (e) Verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by 2 CFR § 200.331 when it is expected that the subrecipient's Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in § 200.501. Cause: The Mayor’s Office of Homeless Services (MOHS) did not maintain adequate documentation of the requirements included in Uniform Guidance related to procedures required for subrecipient monitoring. Effect: MOHS was not in compliance with Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend that MOHS establish and implement controls for the program and prepare and maintain a written plan to perform risk assessments on potential subrecipients. Additionally, we recommend that MOHS provides training on the Uniform Guidance requirements related to subrecipient monitoring. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated
Finding 2022-002 Program: AL No. 10.523 Centers of Excellence at 1890 Institutions Significant Deficiency and Noncompliance over Subrecipient Monitoring Repeat Finding: Yes Condition: Management did not verify that its subrecipient?s were not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transactions. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR ?200.303, the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal controls over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Pursuant to 31 USC 7502(f)(2) (Single Audit Act Amendments of 1996 (Pub. L. No. 104-156)), 2 CFR sections 200.330, .331, and .501(h), a pass-through entity must identify the award and applicable requirements, evaluate risk, monitor, and ensure accountability of subrecipients. Additionally, when entering into subaward transactions, the non-federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. This verification may be accomplished by (1) checking the System for Award Management(SAM)Exclusions maintained by the General Services Administration(GSA). Cause: Program personnel were unaware of the requirement included in Uniform Guidance related to procedures required for subrecipient monitoring. Effect: If subrecipients were not in compliance with Uniform Guidance, the Foundation would not identify the noncompliance timely. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend that the Foundation continue to improve the subrecipient monitoring controls its Federal programs and prepare and maintain a written plan to monitor its subrecipients. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Refer to management?s corrective action plans. Auditor?s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Finding 2022-002 Program: AL No. 10.523 Centers of Excellence at 1890 Institutions Significant Deficiency and Noncompliance over Subrecipient Monitoring Repeat Finding: Yes Condition: Management did not verify that its subrecipient?s were not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transactions. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR ?200.303, the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal controls over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Pursuant to 31 USC 7502(f)(2) (Single Audit Act Amendments of 1996 (Pub. L. No. 104-156)), 2 CFR sections 200.330, .331, and .501(h), a pass-through entity must identify the award and applicable requirements, evaluate risk, monitor, and ensure accountability of subrecipients. Additionally, when entering into subaward transactions, the non-federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. This verification may be accomplished by (1) checking the System for Award Management(SAM)Exclusions maintained by the General Services Administration(GSA). Cause: Program personnel were unaware of the requirement included in Uniform Guidance related to procedures required for subrecipient monitoring. Effect: If subrecipients were not in compliance with Uniform Guidance, the Foundation would not identify the noncompliance timely. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend that the Foundation continue to improve the subrecipient monitoring controls its Federal programs and prepare and maintain a written plan to monitor its subrecipients. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Refer to management?s corrective action plans. Auditor?s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Finding 2022-002 Program: AL No. 10.523 Centers of Excellence at 1890 Institutions Significant Deficiency and Noncompliance over Subrecipient Monitoring Repeat Finding: Yes Condition: Management did not verify that its subrecipient?s were not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transactions. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR ?200.303, the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal controls over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Pursuant to 31 USC 7502(f)(2) (Single Audit Act Amendments of 1996 (Pub. L. No. 104-156)), 2 CFR sections 200.330, .331, and .501(h), a pass-through entity must identify the award and applicable requirements, evaluate risk, monitor, and ensure accountability of subrecipients. Additionally, when entering into subaward transactions, the non-federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. This verification may be accomplished by (1) checking the System for Award Management(SAM)Exclusions maintained by the General Services Administration(GSA). Cause: Program personnel were unaware of the requirement included in Uniform Guidance related to procedures required for subrecipient monitoring. Effect: If subrecipients were not in compliance with Uniform Guidance, the Foundation would not identify the noncompliance timely. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend that the Foundation continue to improve the subrecipient monitoring controls its Federal programs and prepare and maintain a written plan to monitor its subrecipients. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Refer to management?s corrective action plans. Auditor?s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Finding 2022-002 Program: AL No. 10.523 Centers of Excellence at 1890 Institutions Significant Deficiency and Noncompliance over Subrecipient Monitoring Repeat Finding: Yes Condition: Management did not verify that its subrecipient?s were not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transactions. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR ?200.303, the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal controls over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Pursuant to 31 USC 7502(f)(2) (Single Audit Act Amendments of 1996 (Pub. L. No. 104-156)), 2 CFR sections 200.330, .331, and .501(h), a pass-through entity must identify the award and applicable requirements, evaluate risk, monitor, and ensure accountability of subrecipients. Additionally, when entering into subaward transactions, the non-federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. This verification may be accomplished by (1) checking the System for Award Management(SAM)Exclusions maintained by the General Services Administration(GSA). Cause: Program personnel were unaware of the requirement included in Uniform Guidance related to procedures required for subrecipient monitoring. Effect: If subrecipients were not in compliance with Uniform Guidance, the Foundation would not identify the noncompliance timely. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend that the Foundation continue to improve the subrecipient monitoring controls its Federal programs and prepare and maintain a written plan to monitor its subrecipients. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Refer to management?s corrective action plans. Auditor?s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Finding 2022-002 Program: AL No. 10.523 Centers of Excellence at 1890 Institutions Significant Deficiency and Noncompliance over Subrecipient Monitoring Repeat Finding: Yes Condition: Management did not verify that its subrecipient?s were not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transactions. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR ?200.303, the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal controls over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Pursuant to 31 USC 7502(f)(2) (Single Audit Act Amendments of 1996 (Pub. L. No. 104-156)), 2 CFR sections 200.330, .331, and .501(h), a pass-through entity must identify the award and applicable requirements, evaluate risk, monitor, and ensure accountability of subrecipients. Additionally, when entering into subaward transactions, the non-federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. This verification may be accomplished by (1) checking the System for Award Management(SAM)Exclusions maintained by the General Services Administration(GSA). Cause: Program personnel were unaware of the requirement included in Uniform Guidance related to procedures required for subrecipient monitoring. Effect: If subrecipients were not in compliance with Uniform Guidance, the Foundation would not identify the noncompliance timely. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend that the Foundation continue to improve the subrecipient monitoring controls its Federal programs and prepare and maintain a written plan to monitor its subrecipients. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Refer to management?s corrective action plans. Auditor?s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Finding 2022-002 Program: AL No. 10.523 Centers of Excellence at 1890 Institutions Significant Deficiency and Noncompliance over Subrecipient Monitoring Repeat Finding: Yes Condition: Management did not verify that its subrecipient?s were not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transactions. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR ?200.303, the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal controls over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Pursuant to 31 USC 7502(f)(2) (Single Audit Act Amendments of 1996 (Pub. L. No. 104-156)), 2 CFR sections 200.330, .331, and .501(h), a pass-through entity must identify the award and applicable requirements, evaluate risk, monitor, and ensure accountability of subrecipients. Additionally, when entering into subaward transactions, the non-federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. This verification may be accomplished by (1) checking the System for Award Management(SAM)Exclusions maintained by the General Services Administration(GSA). Cause: Program personnel were unaware of the requirement included in Uniform Guidance related to procedures required for subrecipient monitoring. Effect: If subrecipients were not in compliance with Uniform Guidance, the Foundation would not identify the noncompliance timely. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend that the Foundation continue to improve the subrecipient monitoring controls its Federal programs and prepare and maintain a written plan to monitor its subrecipients. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Refer to management?s corrective action plans. Auditor?s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Finding 2022-002 Program: AL No. 10.523 Centers of Excellence at 1890 Institutions Significant Deficiency and Noncompliance over Subrecipient Monitoring Repeat Finding: Yes Condition: Management did not verify that its subrecipient?s were not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transactions. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR ?200.303, the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal controls over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Pursuant to 31 USC 7502(f)(2) (Single Audit Act Amendments of 1996 (Pub. L. No. 104-156)), 2 CFR sections 200.330, .331, and .501(h), a pass-through entity must identify the award and applicable requirements, evaluate risk, monitor, and ensure accountability of subrecipients. Additionally, when entering into subaward transactions, the non-federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. This verification may be accomplished by (1) checking the System for Award Management(SAM)Exclusions maintained by the General Services Administration(GSA). Cause: Program personnel were unaware of the requirement included in Uniform Guidance related to procedures required for subrecipient monitoring. Effect: If subrecipients were not in compliance with Uniform Guidance, the Foundation would not identify the noncompliance timely. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend that the Foundation continue to improve the subrecipient monitoring controls its Federal programs and prepare and maintain a written plan to monitor its subrecipients. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Refer to management?s corrective action plans. Auditor?s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.