Condition: During our audit of the Abandoned Mine Land and Reclamation Program, we noted that the submission of the quarterly SF-425 Federal Financial Reports was not completed within 30 days after the reporting period end date. Context: The SF-425 Federal Financial Reports for the four quarters of fiscal year 2024 were not submitted by their respective deadlines of 30 days after the reporting period end date. All fiscal year 2024 reports were filed in April 2025. Criteria: 2 C.F.R. § 1000.10 gives regulatory effect to the Department of Treasury for 2 C.F.R. § 200.328, which establishes requirements over federal reporting, and states: Unless otherwise approved by OMB, the Federal awarding agency must solicit only the OMB-approved governmentwide data elements for collection of financial information at time of publication the Federal Financial Report or such future, OMB-approved, governmentwide data elements available from the OMB-designated standards lead. This information must be collected with the frequency required by the terms and conditions of the Federal award, but no less frequently than annually nor more frequently than quarterly except in unusual circumstances, for example where more frequent reporting is necessary for the effective monitoring of the Federal award or could significantly affect program outcomes, and preferably in coordination with performance reporting. The Federal awarding agency must use OMB approved common information collections, as applicable, when providing financial and performance reporting information. 2 C.F.R. § 1000.10 gives regulatory effect to the Department of Treasury for 2 C.F.R. § 200.329(b), which establishes requirements over federal reporting, and states: Reporting program performance. The Federal awarding agency must use OMB-approved common information collections, as applicable, when providing financial and performance reporting information. As appropriate and in accordance with above mentioned information collections, the Federal awarding agency must require the recipient to relate financial data and accomplishments to performance goals and objectives of the Federal award. Also, in accordance with above mentioned common information collections, and when required by the terms and conditions of the Federal award, recipients must provide cost information to demonstrate cost effective practices (e.g., through unit cost data). In some instances (e.g., discretionary research awards), this will be limited to the requirement to submit technical performance reports (to be evaluated in accordance with Federal awarding agency policy). Reporting requirements must be clearly articulated such that, where appropriate, performance during the execution of the Federal award has a standard against which non-Federal entity performance can be measured. It is management's responsibility to implement internal control procedures to reasonably ensure the federal reports they submit are accurate, complete, and in compliance with program requirements. It is imperative that management be able to provide the underlying data and related program documentation required to prepare and support these reports. The Town’s management is responsible for the preparation of the quarterly SF-425 Federal Financial Report, as required by 2 C.F.R. § 200.328. Questioned Costs: $0 Cause: The Town did not have adequate controls in place to ensure the quarterly SF-425 Federal Financial Reports, were submitted within 30 days after the reporting period end date. Effect: The SF-425 Federal Financial Reports were not submitted by their respective deadlines of 30 days after the reporting period end date. Recommendation: We recommend the Town review these regulations and comply with the provisions set forth therein. A policy should be established to ensure that each SF-425 Federal Financial Report is submitted by its due date of 30 days after the reporting period end date. Management should periodically review these procedures to ensure they are operating as intended. Response: Management stated they have established a policy to ensure each quarterly report is submitted by its due date.
CONDITION: The District did not properly record its federal program expenditures for the ESSER and ARP ESER federal grant programs using the various funding source expenditure codes as prescribed by the Chart of Accounts for PA Local Educational Agencies maintained by the PA Office of the Budget, Office of Comptroller Operations and well as Section 2 CFR 200.302(a) of the Uniform Guidance. This is a repeat finding from (2023-003) from the previous fiscal year. CRITERIA: The financial management system of the District must provide for 1) identification in it’s accounts, of all Federal awards received and expended and the Federal programs under which they were received, and 2) accurate, current and complete disclosure of the financial results of each federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in sections 200.328 and 200.329 of the Uniform Guidance. EFFECT: The District was not in compliance with the financial reporting requirements in the Chart of Accounts for PA Local Educational Agencies maintained by the PA Office of the Budget, Office of Comptroller Operations and well as Section 2 CFR 200.302(a) of the Uniform Guidance. CAUSE: The District experienced turnover in key business office personnel during the last three fiscal years, which resulted in errors in posting federal expenditures to the appropriate general ledger account codes. This further lead to inaccurate reporting as outlined above. QUESTIONED COST: None RECOMMENDATION: I recommend that the District properly follow the guidance contained within the PA Office of the Budget, Office of Comptroller Operations Chart of Accounts for recording all expenditures of the District, most specifically, federal program grant expenditures to 1) enhance internal controls for tracking and monitoring federal program expenditures and 2) comply with the recordkeeping requirements for federal funds as specified in 2 CFR Part 200 of the Uniform Guidance and PDE regulations. VIEW OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS: See Correction Action Plan
CONDITION: The District did not properly record its federal program expenditures for the ESSER and ARP ESER federal grant programs using the various funding source expenditure codes as prescribed by the Chart of Accounts for PA Local Educational Agencies maintained by the PA Office of the Budget, Office of Comptroller Operations and well as Section 2 CFR 200.302(a) of the Uniform Guidance. This is a repeat finding from (2023-003) from the previous fiscal year. CRITERIA: The financial management system of the District must provide for 1) identification in it’s accounts, of all Federal awards received and expended and the Federal programs under which they were received, and 2) accurate, current and complete disclosure of the financial results of each federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in sections 200.328 and 200.329 of the Uniform Guidance. EFFECT: The District was not in compliance with the financial reporting requirements in the Chart of Accounts for PA Local Educational Agencies maintained by the PA Office of the Budget, Office of Comptroller Operations and well as Section 2 CFR 200.302(a) of the Uniform Guidance. CAUSE: The District experienced turnover in key business office personnel during the last three fiscal years, which resulted in errors in posting federal expenditures to the appropriate general ledger account codes. This further lead to inaccurate reporting as outlined above. QUESTIONED COST: None RECOMMENDATION: I recommend that the District properly follow the guidance contained within the PA Office of the Budget, Office of Comptroller Operations Chart of Accounts for recording all expenditures of the District, most specifically, federal program grant expenditures to 1) enhance internal controls for tracking and monitoring federal program expenditures and 2) comply with the recordkeeping requirements for federal funds as specified in 2 CFR Part 200 of the Uniform Guidance and PDE regulations. VIEW OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS: See Correction Action Plan
CONDITION: The District did not properly record its federal program expenditures for the ESSER and ARP ESER federal grant programs using the various funding source expenditure codes as prescribed by the Chart of Accounts for PA Local Educational Agencies maintained by the PA Office of the Budget, Office of Comptroller Operations and well as Section 2 CFR 200.302(a) of the Uniform Guidance. This is a repeat finding from (2023-003) from the previous fiscal year. CRITERIA: The financial management system of the District must provide for 1) identification in it’s accounts, of all Federal awards received and expended and the Federal programs under which they were received, and 2) accurate, current and complete disclosure of the financial results of each federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in sections 200.328 and 200.329 of the Uniform Guidance. EFFECT: The District was not in compliance with the financial reporting requirements in the Chart of Accounts for PA Local Educational Agencies maintained by the PA Office of the Budget, Office of Comptroller Operations and well as Section 2 CFR 200.302(a) of the Uniform Guidance. CAUSE: The District experienced turnover in key business office personnel during the last three fiscal years, which resulted in errors in posting federal expenditures to the appropriate general ledger account codes. This further lead to inaccurate reporting as outlined above. QUESTIONED COST: None RECOMMENDATION: I recommend that the District properly follow the guidance contained within the PA Office of the Budget, Office of Comptroller Operations Chart of Accounts for recording all expenditures of the District, most specifically, federal program grant expenditures to 1) enhance internal controls for tracking and monitoring federal program expenditures and 2) comply with the recordkeeping requirements for federal funds as specified in 2 CFR Part 200 of the Uniform Guidance and PDE regulations. VIEW OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS: See Correction Action Plan
Criteria or Specific Requirement: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302(b)(4) and 2 CFR 200.329(a), nonfederal entities must establish internal controls to ensure accountability over federal funds and must monitor grant activities to ensure compliance with applicable requirements and achievement of performance goals. These responsibilities include assigning oversight roles and implementing processes to track both financial and programmatic aspects of federal awards. Condition and Context: During the audit, it was noted that Solvista Health did not have clearly defined roles and responsibilities for monitoring grant activities. It was difficult to determine who within the organization was responsible for overseeing compliance with grant requirements, tracking grant performance, and ensuring proper financial management of the grant funds. When asked, management was unable to identify designated individuals or a department currently accountable for these duties. Questioned Costs: N/A Cause: Solvista Health does not have an established formal grant management structure or assigned responsibility for grant oversight. Effect: Lack of properly designed and implemented internal controls, including policies and procedures relating to accountability and oversight of federal programs, may result in noncompliance with federal grant requirements under 2 CFR § 200.329 (monitoring and reporting program performance) and § 200.302 (financial management). Identification as a Repeat Finding: Not a repeat finding. Recommendation: Solvista Health should design and implement internal controls related to federal program grant management, including assignment of responsibility for grant oversight to specific individuals or departments. This will help ensure that Solvista Health is in compliance with federal regulations related to the monitoring and oversight of grant activities.
Criteria or Specific Requirement: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302(b)(4) and 2 CFR 200.329(a), nonfederal entities must establish internal controls to ensure accountability over federal funds and must monitor grant activities to ensure compliance with applicable requirements and achievement of performance goals. These responsibilities include assigning oversight roles and implementing processes to track both financial and programmatic aspects of federal awards. Condition and Context: During the audit, it was noted that Solvista Health did not have clearly defined roles and responsibilities for monitoring grant activities. It was difficult to determine who within the organization was responsible for overseeing compliance with grant requirements, tracking grant performance, and ensuring proper financial management of the grant funds. When asked, management was unable to identify designated individuals or a department currently accountable for these duties. Questioned Costs: N/A Cause: Solvista Health does not have an established formal grant management structure or assigned responsibility for grant oversight. Effect: Lack of properly designed and implemented internal controls, including policies and procedures relating to accountability and oversight of federal programs, may result in noncompliance with federal grant requirements under 2 CFR § 200.329 (monitoring and reporting program performance) and § 200.302 (financial management). Identification as a Repeat Finding: Not a repeat finding. Recommendation: Solvista Health should design and implement internal controls related to federal program grant management, including assignment of responsibility for grant oversight to specific individuals or departments. This will help ensure that Solvista Health is in compliance with federal regulations related to the monitoring and oversight of grant activities.
Criteria or Specific Requirement: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302(b)(4) and 2 CFR 200.329(a), nonfederal entities must establish internal controls to ensure accountability over federal funds and must monitor grant activities to ensure compliance with applicable requirements and achievement of performance goals. These responsibilities include assigning oversight roles and implementing processes to track both financial and programmatic aspects of federal awards. Condition and Context: During the audit, it was noted that Solvista Health did not have clearly defined roles and responsibilities for monitoring grant activities. It was difficult to determine who within the organization was responsible for overseeing compliance with grant requirements, tracking grant performance, and ensuring proper financial management of the grant funds. When asked, management was unable to identify designated individuals or a department currently accountable for these duties. Questioned Costs: N/A Cause: Solvista Health does not have an established formal grant management structure or assigned responsibility for grant oversight. Effect: Lack of properly designed and implemented internal controls, including policies and procedures relating to accountability and oversight of federal programs, may result in noncompliance with federal grant requirements under 2 CFR § 200.329 (monitoring and reporting program performance) and § 200.302 (financial management). Identification as a Repeat Finding: Not a repeat finding. Recommendation: Solvista Health should design and implement internal controls related to federal program grant management, including assignment of responsibility for grant oversight to specific individuals or departments. This will help ensure that Solvista Health is in compliance with federal regulations related to the monitoring and oversight of grant activities.
Criteria or Specific Requirement: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302(b)(4) and 2 CFR 200.329(a), nonfederal entities must establish internal controls to ensure accountability over federal funds and must monitor grant activities to ensure compliance with applicable requirements and achievement of performance goals. These responsibilities include assigning oversight roles and implementing processes to track both financial and programmatic aspects of federal awards. Condition and Context: During the audit, it was noted that Solvista Health did not have clearly defined roles and responsibilities for monitoring grant activities. It was difficult to determine who within the organization was responsible for overseeing compliance with grant requirements, tracking grant performance, and ensuring proper financial management of the grant funds. When asked, management was unable to identify designated individuals or a department currently accountable for these duties. Questioned Costs: N/A Cause: Solvista Health does not have an established formal grant management structure or assigned responsibility for grant oversight. Effect: Lack of properly designed and implemented internal controls, including policies and procedures relating to accountability and oversight of federal programs, may result in noncompliance with federal grant requirements under 2 CFR § 200.329 (monitoring and reporting program performance) and § 200.302 (financial management). Identification as a Repeat Finding: Not a repeat finding. Recommendation: Solvista Health should design and implement internal controls related to federal program grant management, including assignment of responsibility for grant oversight to specific individuals or departments. This will help ensure that Solvista Health is in compliance with federal regulations related to the monitoring and oversight of grant activities.
2024‐005 Reporting (2023‐009) Reporting (Significant Deficiency) (Repeat/Modified) Federal Program Information: Funding Agency: Department of the Justice Title: Public Safety Partnership and Community Policing Grants Assistance Listing Number: 16.710 Compliance Requirement: Reporting Award Year: July 1, 2023 to June 30, 2024 Condition: During our audit, we noted that the City did not submit all of its quarterly financial reports and one progress report in a timely manner. The City did make progress in this finding. In prior year, the City did not submit the proper reports, however, this year, all 4 quarterly reports were submitted, however, 3 out of 4 were late. Criteria: The City must submit the federal financial reports 30 days after the end of the end of each quarter (2 CFR 200.329 section (c)(1). Effect: The City was not in compliance with the reporting requirement; the City did not submit information in a timely manner for three quarters of the fiscal year. Questioned Costs: None Cause: The City had turnover that handled this duty during the time that the reports were due to be submitted and so it was not completed until the end of the fiscal year. Auditors’ Recommendation: We recommend that the City ensure that it has more than one position responsible for submitting these quarterly and any progress reports to the federal government to ensure that they are always completed even if one position is vacant. Agency’s Response: The City of acknowledges the audit finding regarding the untimely submission of reporting for the Cops Hiring program. This was a result of turnover, and the new grant manager was not hired until the middle of fiscal year 2024. The Procurement officer, who manages grants, as well as the Finance Director, have prioritized compliance with federal reporting requirements. To prevent future occurrences, the Finance Department has implemented internal controls ensuring multiple staff members are responsible for federal reporting. Specifically, both the Finance Director and the Financial Analyst now share the responsibility and authority to complete and submit these annual reports. This new process ensures continuity in reporting, even in the event of staff turnover, and strengthens the City’s commitment to compliance with federal funding requirements. Additionally, the Finance Director oversees this responsibility so there are now multiple controls to ensure timely completion. Responsible Parties: The Director of Finance. Timeline: June 30, 2025
Condition: During the test of 100 % of projects, sixteen (16) projects, for the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, the following noncompliance with the Reporting compliance requirement was noted: • The third quarter report was not submitted. • The fourth quarter report was not timely submitted. • Four (4) projects were coded as revenue loss and should have been coded to an administrative expense code. • Four (4) projects were coded as revenue loss and should have been coded as a subrecipient. • Two (2) projects were coded as a subrecipient and were not a subrecipient relationship. After the review of the quarterly reports, the following exceptions were noted: • The second quarter report was understated by $257,160. • Health Department reported cumulative total of $1,090,483 in expenditures; however, disbursements totaled $1,089,725. • Emergency Management reported cumulative total of $276,279 in expenditures; however, disbursements totaled $333,169. • Rogers County Sheriff reported cumulative total of $300,000 in expenditures; however, disbursements totaled $233,344. • The consultant hired by the county to administer the grant reported cumulative total of $251,427 in expenditures; however, disbursements totaled was $287,346. Jail Remodel had expenditures of $231,765; however, it was no expenditures were listed on the report. Cause of Condition: Policies and procedures have not been designed and implemented to ensure federal expenditures are properly reported in accordance with federal compliance requirements. Effect of Condition: This condition resulted in noncompliance with federal grant guidelines. Recommendation: OSAI recommends the County gain an understanding of the requirements for this program and implement internal controls to ensure compliance with these requirements Management Response: Board of County Commissioners: The Board of County Commissioners is responsible for the overall fiscal concerns of the county. See OKLA. STAT. Title 19, § 345. The Board of County Commissioners, with the cooperation and participation of all elected officials, reviews, develops and implements policies and procedures to create a strong internal control environment. The Board of County Commissioners will work with all elected officials, the third-party administrator, and federal, state and local partners to develop policies, procedures, and internal controls designed to accurately track grants, including the application process, verification, oversight, and reporting of grant requirements. These policies and procedures will be designed to identify requirements for recipients and sub-recipients of grants, ensure accurate equipment and real property management, procurement, recipient and subrecipient monitoring and reporting. Further, policies will ensure a proper understanding of all grant requirements and compliance of the same. To assist in this process, the Board of County Commissioners engaged a third-party administrator to oversee the grant process, including application, eligibility, review, requirements, contracting, recipient tracking and oversight, and documentation and reporting. The Board of County Commissioners will work with the third-party administrator to ensure proper grant administration. Criteria: Accountability and stewardship should be overall goals in management’s accounting of federal funds. Internal controls should be designed to monitor compliance with laws and regulations pertaining to grant contracts. Title 2 CFR § 200.303(a) Internal Controls, reads as follows: The non-federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework, “issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Compliance and Reporting Guidance, State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (10. Reporting) reads as follows: All recipients of federal funds must complete financial, performance, and compliance reporting as required and outlines in Part 2 of this guidance. Expenditures may be reported on a cash of accrual basis, as long as the methodology is disclosed and consistently applied. Reporting must be consistent with the definition of expenditures pursuant to 2 CFR 200.1. Your organization should appropriately maintain accounting records for compiling and reporting accurate, compliant financial data, in accordance with appropriate accounting standards and principles. In addition, where appropriate, your organization needs to establish internal controls to ensure completion and timely submission of all mandatory performance and/or compliance reporting. Further, 2 CFR 200.329-Monitoring and reporting Program Performance (c)(1) reads as follows: (c)(1) The non-Federal entity must submit performance reports at the interval required by the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity to best inform improvements in program outcomes and productivity. Intervals must be no less frequent than annually nor more frequent than quarterly except in unusual circumstances, for example where more frequent reporting is necessary for the effective monitoring of the Federal award or could significantly affect program outcomes. Reports submitted annually by the non-Federal entity and/or pass-through entity must be due no later than 90 calendar days after the reporting period. Reports submitted quarterly or semiannually must be due no later than 30 calendar days after the reporting period. Alternatively, the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may require annual reports before the anniversary dates of multiple year Federal awards. The final performance report submitted by the non-Federal entity and/or pass-through entity must be due no later than 120 calendar gays after the period of performance end date. A subrecipient must submit to the pass-through entity, no later than 90 calendar days after the period of performance end date, all final performance reports as required by the terms and conditions of the Federal award. See also §200.344. If a justified request is submitted by a non-Federal entity, the Federal agency may extend the due date for any performance report.
2024-004 – Reporting Required by the Uniform Grant Guidance Finding Type. Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance and Immaterial Noncompliance (Reporting) Program. COVID-19 State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Cluster (CFDA# 21.027); U.S. Department of Treasury; Passed through State of Oregon Department of Administrative Services. Criteria. Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.328 through 200.329. Condition. The District did not submit quarterly reports in compliance with 2 CFR sections 200.328 through 200.329. Cause. The District did not submit quarterly reports in compliance with grant requirements as no internal controls were in place to ensure compliance was maintained. Effect. As a result of this condition, the District did not fully comply with 2 CFR Part 200. Questioned Costs. No costs have been questioned as a result of this finding. Recommendation. We recommend that the District establish internal controls associated with grant reporting requirements to ensure compliance is maintained. View of Responsible Officials. We agree with the recommendation and will develop procedures to comply with the Uniform Guidance applicable to grants
2024-002 Improve Oversight Over Reporting of Federal Awards (Material Weakness) Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Cluster/Program: COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund AL Number(s): 21.027 Award Year: 2024 Compliance Requirement: Reporting Type of Finding Material Noncompliance Internal Control over Compliance – Material Weakness Criteria or Specific Requirement A non-federal entity is required to submit a performance report annually using a form or format authorized by OMB (2 CFR section 200.329) based on expenditures reported in the Town’s general ledger. Management of the Town is also responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over compliance with federal requirements that have a direct and material effect on a federal pro¬gram. A deficiency in internal control over compliance exists when the design or operation of a control over compliance does not allow management or employees, in the normal course of per¬forming their assigned functions, to prevent, or detect and correct, noncompliance with a type of compliance requirement of a federal program on a timely basis. 2024-002 Improve Oversight Over Reporting of Federal Awards (Material Weakness) (Continued) Condition and Context When comparing annual amounts reported to the Treasury to the actual Town expenses, we noted several expenses were omitted from the Treasury reports. Cause The Town has not established adequate procedures to ensure expenditures reported on the annual report agree with the Town’s general ledger. Effect or Potential Effect The Town is not in compliance with the Uniform Guidance requirements for reporting. Questioned Costs There are no questioned costs as a result of this finding, as these costs were allowable and did occur, but they were reported in the incorrect reporting period. Recommendation The Town should implement controls to ensure that reports are reconciled to the general ledger prior to submission. Views of Responsible Official Management agrees with the finding.
Finding 2024-003 Improper Revenue Recognition (Material Weakness) Assistance Listing Number and Title: 84.010 Title I Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Assistance Listing Number and Title: 10.553 and 10.555 National School Lunch Breakfast and Lunch Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Criteria: Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over financial report-ing. Internal controls should allow management or employees in the normal course of performing their assigned func-tions to prevent or detect material misstatements in the financial reporting of all district funds. 2 CFR Part 200.302(b)(1) The financial management system of each non-federal entity must provide for the following: Identification, in its accounts, of all Federal awards received and expended and the Federal programs under which they were received. 200.302(b)(2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in 200.328 and 200.329. Condition: During our audit, it was noted that revenue from certain grant-funded programs was not accurately recog-nized between state and federal sources. Specifically: • Some payments of federal revenue was recorded as state revenue, and some payments of state revenue was rec-orded as federal revenue. • In some cases, revenue was not recognized in the correct reporting period. This caused under recognition of current year federal revenue, and grant reimbursement to be therefore to be claimed in duplicate. Cause: Lack of clear procedures for distinguishing and recording revenue streams for blended funding sources. Internal controls to prevent, detect and correct accounting entries for grant revenues were weak or nonexistent allowing errors in reporting of revenues, overclaiming of federal revenues, and distinguishing revenue between state and federal sources. The lack of timely recognition of revenues caused the overclaiming of Title I. The accounting records were retroactively revised during the audit, for federal award and other reporting purposes. Dis-trict management did not have sufficient training or monitoring policies to recognize and correct the deficiency during the fiscal year. Effect or Potential Effect: Not accurately recording transactions timely into the general ledger, may result in transac-tions not being properly reported in the district’s financial statements and the ability to rely on the general ledger for correct and timely information. This may cause misstatement of financial statements, and inappropriate reporting of federal awards. Questioned Cost: No Context: Due to improper recording of financial activity, Title I grant revenues were overclaimed, and general ledger required adjustment for proper state and federal presentation of grant revenues for National School Lunch Program. Repeat of a Prior-Year Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend that Willamina School District implement accounting staff training programs, and implement a standardized revenue recognition policy that clearly distinguishes between state and federal funding sources. Additionally, we recommend that a reconciliation process be established to ensure all federal, state and matching funds are recorded timely and accurately. District's Response: The District concurs with the recommendation. Corrective Action Plan: The District will provide training for staff in order to devise and implement appropriate poli-cies and procedures for accurately recording all financial transactions, including federal award revenues and expendi-tures. Additional internal control policies will be adopted and procedures implemented as on-going improvement efforts are made. Planned Implementation Date: August 1, 2025 Responsible Person: District Business Manager
Finding 2024-003 Improper Revenue Recognition (Material Weakness) Assistance Listing Number and Title: 84.010 Title I Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Assistance Listing Number and Title: 10.553 and 10.555 National School Lunch Breakfast and Lunch Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Criteria: Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over financial report-ing. Internal controls should allow management or employees in the normal course of performing their assigned func-tions to prevent or detect material misstatements in the financial reporting of all district funds. 2 CFR Part 200.302(b)(1) The financial management system of each non-federal entity must provide for the following: Identification, in its accounts, of all Federal awards received and expended and the Federal programs under which they were received. 200.302(b)(2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in 200.328 and 200.329. Condition: During our audit, it was noted that revenue from certain grant-funded programs was not accurately recog-nized between state and federal sources. Specifically: • Some payments of federal revenue was recorded as state revenue, and some payments of state revenue was rec-orded as federal revenue. • In some cases, revenue was not recognized in the correct reporting period. This caused under recognition of current year federal revenue, and grant reimbursement to be therefore to be claimed in duplicate. Cause: Lack of clear procedures for distinguishing and recording revenue streams for blended funding sources. Internal controls to prevent, detect and correct accounting entries for grant revenues were weak or nonexistent allowing errors in reporting of revenues, overclaiming of federal revenues, and distinguishing revenue between state and federal sources. The lack of timely recognition of revenues caused the overclaiming of Title I. The accounting records were retroactively revised during the audit, for federal award and other reporting purposes. Dis-trict management did not have sufficient training or monitoring policies to recognize and correct the deficiency during the fiscal year. Effect or Potential Effect: Not accurately recording transactions timely into the general ledger, may result in transac-tions not being properly reported in the district’s financial statements and the ability to rely on the general ledger for correct and timely information. This may cause misstatement of financial statements, and inappropriate reporting of federal awards. Questioned Cost: No Context: Due to improper recording of financial activity, Title I grant revenues were overclaimed, and general ledger required adjustment for proper state and federal presentation of grant revenues for National School Lunch Program. Repeat of a Prior-Year Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend that Willamina School District implement accounting staff training programs, and implement a standardized revenue recognition policy that clearly distinguishes between state and federal funding sources. Additionally, we recommend that a reconciliation process be established to ensure all federal, state and matching funds are recorded timely and accurately. District's Response: The District concurs with the recommendation. Corrective Action Plan: The District will provide training for staff in order to devise and implement appropriate poli-cies and procedures for accurately recording all financial transactions, including federal award revenues and expendi-tures. Additional internal control policies will be adopted and procedures implemented as on-going improvement efforts are made. Planned Implementation Date: August 1, 2025 Responsible Person: District Business Manager
Finding 2024-003 Improper Revenue Recognition (Material Weakness) Assistance Listing Number and Title: 84.010 Title I Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Assistance Listing Number and Title: 10.553 and 10.555 National School Lunch Breakfast and Lunch Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Criteria: Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over financial report-ing. Internal controls should allow management or employees in the normal course of performing their assigned func-tions to prevent or detect material misstatements in the financial reporting of all district funds. 2 CFR Part 200.302(b)(1) The financial management system of each non-federal entity must provide for the following: Identification, in its accounts, of all Federal awards received and expended and the Federal programs under which they were received. 200.302(b)(2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in 200.328 and 200.329. Condition: During our audit, it was noted that revenue from certain grant-funded programs was not accurately recog-nized between state and federal sources. Specifically: • Some payments of federal revenue was recorded as state revenue, and some payments of state revenue was rec-orded as federal revenue. • In some cases, revenue was not recognized in the correct reporting period. This caused under recognition of current year federal revenue, and grant reimbursement to be therefore to be claimed in duplicate. Cause: Lack of clear procedures for distinguishing and recording revenue streams for blended funding sources. Internal controls to prevent, detect and correct accounting entries for grant revenues were weak or nonexistent allowing errors in reporting of revenues, overclaiming of federal revenues, and distinguishing revenue between state and federal sources. The lack of timely recognition of revenues caused the overclaiming of Title I. The accounting records were retroactively revised during the audit, for federal award and other reporting purposes. Dis-trict management did not have sufficient training or monitoring policies to recognize and correct the deficiency during the fiscal year. Effect or Potential Effect: Not accurately recording transactions timely into the general ledger, may result in transac-tions not being properly reported in the district’s financial statements and the ability to rely on the general ledger for correct and timely information. This may cause misstatement of financial statements, and inappropriate reporting of federal awards. Questioned Cost: No Context: Due to improper recording of financial activity, Title I grant revenues were overclaimed, and general ledger required adjustment for proper state and federal presentation of grant revenues for National School Lunch Program. Repeat of a Prior-Year Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend that Willamina School District implement accounting staff training programs, and implement a standardized revenue recognition policy that clearly distinguishes between state and federal funding sources. Additionally, we recommend that a reconciliation process be established to ensure all federal, state and matching funds are recorded timely and accurately. District's Response: The District concurs with the recommendation. Corrective Action Plan: The District will provide training for staff in order to devise and implement appropriate poli-cies and procedures for accurately recording all financial transactions, including federal award revenues and expendi-tures. Additional internal control policies will be adopted and procedures implemented as on-going improvement efforts are made. Planned Implementation Date: August 1, 2025 Responsible Person: District Business Manager
Finding 2024-003 Improper Revenue Recognition (Material Weakness) Assistance Listing Number and Title: 84.010 Title I Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Assistance Listing Number and Title: 10.553 and 10.555 National School Lunch Breakfast and Lunch Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Criteria: Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over financial report-ing. Internal controls should allow management or employees in the normal course of performing their assigned func-tions to prevent or detect material misstatements in the financial reporting of all district funds. 2 CFR Part 200.302(b)(1) The financial management system of each non-federal entity must provide for the following: Identification, in its accounts, of all Federal awards received and expended and the Federal programs under which they were received. 200.302(b)(2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in 200.328 and 200.329. Condition: During our audit, it was noted that revenue from certain grant-funded programs was not accurately recog-nized between state and federal sources. Specifically: • Some payments of federal revenue was recorded as state revenue, and some payments of state revenue was rec-orded as federal revenue. • In some cases, revenue was not recognized in the correct reporting period. This caused under recognition of current year federal revenue, and grant reimbursement to be therefore to be claimed in duplicate. Cause: Lack of clear procedures for distinguishing and recording revenue streams for blended funding sources. Internal controls to prevent, detect and correct accounting entries for grant revenues were weak or nonexistent allowing errors in reporting of revenues, overclaiming of federal revenues, and distinguishing revenue between state and federal sources. The lack of timely recognition of revenues caused the overclaiming of Title I. The accounting records were retroactively revised during the audit, for federal award and other reporting purposes. Dis-trict management did not have sufficient training or monitoring policies to recognize and correct the deficiency during the fiscal year. Effect or Potential Effect: Not accurately recording transactions timely into the general ledger, may result in transac-tions not being properly reported in the district’s financial statements and the ability to rely on the general ledger for correct and timely information. This may cause misstatement of financial statements, and inappropriate reporting of federal awards. Questioned Cost: No Context: Due to improper recording of financial activity, Title I grant revenues were overclaimed, and general ledger required adjustment for proper state and federal presentation of grant revenues for National School Lunch Program. Repeat of a Prior-Year Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend that Willamina School District implement accounting staff training programs, and implement a standardized revenue recognition policy that clearly distinguishes between state and federal funding sources. Additionally, we recommend that a reconciliation process be established to ensure all federal, state and matching funds are recorded timely and accurately. District's Response: The District concurs with the recommendation. Corrective Action Plan: The District will provide training for staff in order to devise and implement appropriate poli-cies and procedures for accurately recording all financial transactions, including federal award revenues and expendi-tures. Additional internal control policies will be adopted and procedures implemented as on-going improvement efforts are made. Planned Implementation Date: August 1, 2025 Responsible Person: District Business Manager
Finding 2024-003 Improper Revenue Recognition (Material Weakness) Assistance Listing Number and Title: 84.010 Title I Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Assistance Listing Number and Title: 10.553 and 10.555 National School Lunch Breakfast and Lunch Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Criteria: Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over financial report-ing. Internal controls should allow management or employees in the normal course of performing their assigned func-tions to prevent or detect material misstatements in the financial reporting of all district funds. 2 CFR Part 200.302(b)(1) The financial management system of each non-federal entity must provide for the following: Identification, in its accounts, of all Federal awards received and expended and the Federal programs under which they were received. 200.302(b)(2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in 200.328 and 200.329. Condition: During our audit, it was noted that revenue from certain grant-funded programs was not accurately recog-nized between state and federal sources. Specifically: • Some payments of federal revenue was recorded as state revenue, and some payments of state revenue was rec-orded as federal revenue. • In some cases, revenue was not recognized in the correct reporting period. This caused under recognition of current year federal revenue, and grant reimbursement to be therefore to be claimed in duplicate. Cause: Lack of clear procedures for distinguishing and recording revenue streams for blended funding sources. Internal controls to prevent, detect and correct accounting entries for grant revenues were weak or nonexistent allowing errors in reporting of revenues, overclaiming of federal revenues, and distinguishing revenue between state and federal sources. The lack of timely recognition of revenues caused the overclaiming of Title I. The accounting records were retroactively revised during the audit, for federal award and other reporting purposes. Dis-trict management did not have sufficient training or monitoring policies to recognize and correct the deficiency during the fiscal year. Effect or Potential Effect: Not accurately recording transactions timely into the general ledger, may result in transac-tions not being properly reported in the district’s financial statements and the ability to rely on the general ledger for correct and timely information. This may cause misstatement of financial statements, and inappropriate reporting of federal awards. Questioned Cost: No Context: Due to improper recording of financial activity, Title I grant revenues were overclaimed, and general ledger required adjustment for proper state and federal presentation of grant revenues for National School Lunch Program. Repeat of a Prior-Year Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend that Willamina School District implement accounting staff training programs, and implement a standardized revenue recognition policy that clearly distinguishes between state and federal funding sources. Additionally, we recommend that a reconciliation process be established to ensure all federal, state and matching funds are recorded timely and accurately. District's Response: The District concurs with the recommendation. Corrective Action Plan: The District will provide training for staff in order to devise and implement appropriate poli-cies and procedures for accurately recording all financial transactions, including federal award revenues and expendi-tures. Additional internal control policies will be adopted and procedures implemented as on-going improvement efforts are made. Planned Implementation Date: August 1, 2025 Responsible Person: District Business Manager
Finding 2024-003 Improper Revenue Recognition (Material Weakness) Assistance Listing Number and Title: 84.010 Title I Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Assistance Listing Number and Title: 10.553 and 10.555 National School Lunch Breakfast and Lunch Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Criteria: Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over financial report-ing. Internal controls should allow management or employees in the normal course of performing their assigned func-tions to prevent or detect material misstatements in the financial reporting of all district funds. 2 CFR Part 200.302(b)(1) The financial management system of each non-federal entity must provide for the following: Identification, in its accounts, of all Federal awards received and expended and the Federal programs under which they were received. 200.302(b)(2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in 200.328 and 200.329. Condition: During our audit, it was noted that revenue from certain grant-funded programs was not accurately recog-nized between state and federal sources. Specifically: • Some payments of federal revenue was recorded as state revenue, and some payments of state revenue was rec-orded as federal revenue. • In some cases, revenue was not recognized in the correct reporting period. This caused under recognition of current year federal revenue, and grant reimbursement to be therefore to be claimed in duplicate. Cause: Lack of clear procedures for distinguishing and recording revenue streams for blended funding sources. Internal controls to prevent, detect and correct accounting entries for grant revenues were weak or nonexistent allowing errors in reporting of revenues, overclaiming of federal revenues, and distinguishing revenue between state and federal sources. The lack of timely recognition of revenues caused the overclaiming of Title I. The accounting records were retroactively revised during the audit, for federal award and other reporting purposes. Dis-trict management did not have sufficient training or monitoring policies to recognize and correct the deficiency during the fiscal year. Effect or Potential Effect: Not accurately recording transactions timely into the general ledger, may result in transac-tions not being properly reported in the district’s financial statements and the ability to rely on the general ledger for correct and timely information. This may cause misstatement of financial statements, and inappropriate reporting of federal awards. Questioned Cost: No Context: Due to improper recording of financial activity, Title I grant revenues were overclaimed, and general ledger required adjustment for proper state and federal presentation of grant revenues for National School Lunch Program. Repeat of a Prior-Year Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend that Willamina School District implement accounting staff training programs, and implement a standardized revenue recognition policy that clearly distinguishes between state and federal funding sources. Additionally, we recommend that a reconciliation process be established to ensure all federal, state and matching funds are recorded timely and accurately. District's Response: The District concurs with the recommendation. Corrective Action Plan: The District will provide training for staff in order to devise and implement appropriate poli-cies and procedures for accurately recording all financial transactions, including federal award revenues and expendi-tures. Additional internal control policies will be adopted and procedures implemented as on-going improvement efforts are made. Planned Implementation Date: August 1, 2025 Responsible Person: District Business Manager
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 includes requirements related to internal controls for federal award programs, including that the Agency must, among other things, “establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award.” These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)”. 2 CFR 200.329(c)(1) includes requirements related to performance reports for federal award programs, including that the IEDC must submit performance reports as required by the Federal award. Non-construction awards under Assistance Listing number 11.307 require recipients of awards on or after June 1, 2020, to submit ED-916 and ED-918. Condition and Context: We noted IEDC submitted the SF-425 Federal Financial Report required under the Economic Adjustment Assistance grant which reported an inaccurate amount of cash receipts during the reporting period identified. The difference noted was not material to the major program. We also reviewed whether performance reports ED-916 and ED-918 required under the Economic Adjustment Assistance were submitted in a timely manner noting the reports were not filed as of the required submission date. There were no questioned costs related to this finding. Cause and Effect: We noted lack of internal controls surrounding the reporting process resulted in key line items in the SF-425 Federal Financial Report to be misstated. The errors were identified subsequent to the submission and corrected in the submission of the final SF-425 Federal Financial Report. We also noted lack of internal controls surrounding the reporting process resulted in performance reports for this federal award to be submitted after the required submission date. Recommendation: We recommend IEDC implement procedures to ensure reports are being reviewed by an individual familiar with the program prior to submission and are being submitted timely and accurately during the reporting period. Views of Responsible Officials and Actions Taken: We agree with the recommendation and as of October 2024 have implemented an additional layer of review, effective for the first round of reports filed for FY2025.
Information on Federal Program:United States Department of Health and Human Services Assistance Listing Number: 93.667Assistance Listing Name: Social Services Block Grant Pass-Through Awards under the Uniform Guidance Requirements: Pass-Through Entity Award Number Award Period Ohio Department of Job and Family Services HS157289 January 1, 2023 - December 31, 2023 and January 1, 2024 - December 31, 2024Criteria: CFR 200.329(b) states that when reporting program performance, the recipient or subrecipient must relate financial data and project or program accomplishments to the performance goals and objectives of the federal award. Also, the recipient or subrecipient must provide cost information to demonstrate cost-effective practices (for example, through unit cost data) when required by the terms and conditions of the federal award.Condition: During our testing of reporting, we test selected two reports for testing and noted two exceptions in the ability of management to support payroll reported to for the Title XX federal program. The Organization did not adequately document hours worked per employee per submission, and accordingly, time and effort were not properly supported on a monthly basis. The Organization inadvertently overallocated the time allocation for the program; however, total costs incurred by the Organization after exclusion of the overallocation were not in excess of the amounts funded by the program.Cause: The Organization did not have specific policies and procedures in place as to how monthly personnel costs across federal programs will be aggregated and charged to federal programs.Effect or Potential Effect: An ineffective control system related to the charging of cost to federal programs in order to ensure that only hours worked relating to the programs is charged and requested for reimbursement and can be supported with timecards can lead to noncompliance with law and regulations and possible loss of funding for the related program.Questioned Costs: None. Context: The Organization collects timecards for all employees for submission and approval prior to biweekly payroll. However, a policy or procedure did not exist at the time to ensure that the actual hours incurred (time and effort) billed to the federal agencies on a monthly basis is fully supported at the time of invoicing.Repeat Finding: This is a repeat finding.Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization continues their new policy and procedure to ensure that prior to submission of invoices to federal awarding agencies, management prepare a monthly analysis to support the actual amounts allocated across all programs and invoiced to the awarding agencies, reconciled to payroll reports, which then will allow to evidence that all hours submitted for reimbursement are supported with timecards or appropriate allocation to support costs reported to the program. We further recommend that management continue to review its policies and procedures on a regular and ongoing basis related to the allocation methodology to ensure that its appropriate given changes in the program and workforce.Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management concurs with the finding and the recommendation.
Information on Federal Program:United States Department of Health and Human Services Assistance Listing Number: 93.667Assistance Listing Name: Social Services Block Grant Pass-Through Awards under the Uniform Guidance Requirements: Pass-Through Entity Award Number Award Period Ohio Department of Job and Family Services HS157289 January 1, 2023 - December 31, 2023 and January 1, 2024 - December 31, 2024Criteria: CFR 200.329(b) states that when reporting program performance, the recipient or subrecipient must relate financial data and project or program accomplishments to the performance goals and objectives of the federal award. Also, the recipient or subrecipient must provide cost information to demonstrate cost-effective practices (for example, through unit cost data) when required by the terms and conditions of the federal award.Condition: During our testing of reporting, we test selected two reports for testing and noted two exceptions in the ability of management to support payroll reported to for the Title XX federal program. The Organization did not adequately document hours worked per employee per submission, and accordingly, time and effort were not properly supported on a monthly basis. The Organization inadvertently overallocated the time allocation for the program; however, total costs incurred by the Organization after exclusion of the overallocation were not in excess of the amounts funded by the program.Cause: The Organization did not have specific policies and procedures in place as to how monthly personnel costs across federal programs will be aggregated and charged to federal programs.Effect or Potential Effect: An ineffective control system related to the charging of cost to federal programs in order to ensure that only hours worked relating to the programs is charged and requested for reimbursement and can be supported with timecards can lead to noncompliance with law and regulations and possible loss of funding for the related program.Questioned Costs: None. Context: The Organization collects timecards for all employees for submission and approval prior to biweekly payroll. However, a policy or procedure did not exist at the time to ensure that the actual hours incurred (time and effort) billed to the federal agencies on a monthly basis is fully supported at the time of invoicing.Repeat Finding: This is a repeat finding.Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization continues their new policy and procedure to ensure that prior to submission of invoices to federal awarding agencies, management prepare a monthly analysis to support the actual amounts allocated across all programs and invoiced to the awarding agencies, reconciled to payroll reports, which then will allow to evidence that all hours submitted for reimbursement are supported with timecards or appropriate allocation to support costs reported to the program. We further recommend that management continue to review its policies and procedures on a regular and ongoing basis related to the allocation methodology to ensure that its appropriate given changes in the program and workforce.Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management concurs with the finding and the recommendation.
Finding 2024-002 Untimely Filing of Performance Report (Significant Deficiency) Federal Programs: ALN 15.875 Criteria or Specific Requirement: In accordance with Title 2 CFR 200 Section 200.329 “Monitoring and reporting program performance” recipients of Federal funds to submit a final performance report to a pass-through entity no later than 90 calendar days after the conclusion of the period of performance. Condition: The final performance report for the reporting period ended July 21, 2024 has not yet been submitted in accordance with the grant agreement. Cause: The grant closed prior to the end of the original reporting period and the Foundation was unaware the final report was required to be filed.Effect or Potential Effect: Failure to submit reports timely results in noncompliance with Federal and grant grant provisions and may result in delay of funding. Questioned Costs: None. The late report is programmatic and did not have financial implications. Context: One of three program reports sampled was not submitted. The late submission resulted from human error and oversight. We consider our sample to be representative of the population. Identification as a Repeat Finding: N/A Recommendation: We recommend that the Foundation strengthen its internal controls over performance reporting to ensure compliance with the Federal regulations.
Finding 2024-002 Untimely Filing of Performance Report (Significant Deficiency) Federal Programs: ALN 15.875 Criteria or Specific Requirement: In accordance with Title 2 CFR 200 Section 200.329 “Monitoring and reporting program performance” recipients of Federal funds to submit a final performance report to a pass-through entity no later than 90 calendar days after the conclusion of the period of performance. Condition: The final performance report for the reporting period ended July 21, 2024 has not yet been submitted in accordance with the grant agreement. Cause: The grant closed prior to the end of the original reporting period and the Foundation was unaware the final report was required to be filed.Effect or Potential Effect: Failure to submit reports timely results in noncompliance with Federal and grant grant provisions and may result in delay of funding. Questioned Costs: None. The late report is programmatic and did not have financial implications. Context: One of three program reports sampled was not submitted. The late submission resulted from human error and oversight. We consider our sample to be representative of the population. Identification as a Repeat Finding: N/A Recommendation: We recommend that the Foundation strengthen its internal controls over performance reporting to ensure compliance with the Federal regulations.
FINDING 2024-003 Subject: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - Reporting Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listings Number: 84.425U Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): S425U210013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2022-002. Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not designed or implemented at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. The School Corporation had not designed, nor implemented, a system of internal controls to ensure that the annual Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER) Data Collection reports (Reports) were complete and accurately submitted. The Reports were prepared by one employee without a documented oversight, review, or approval process in place to prevent, or detect and correct, errors. Due to the lack of effective internal controls, two of the five Reports submitted during the audit period were not supported by the School Corporation's records. The following errors were noted: For the ESSER III, Year 2 report, which covered the period July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022, total expenses reported were understated by $369,741. For the ESSER III, Year 3 report, which covered the period July 1, 2022 to June 30, 2023, total expenses reported for Property - Mandatory Subgrant Funds - Exclusive of Learning Loss Set-Aside were understated by $519,504. Total expenses reported for Supplies - Mandatory Subgrant Funds - Learning Loss Set-Aside were overstated by $11,260. The lack of internal controls was a systemic issue throughout the audit period. Noncompliance was isolated to the ESSER III, Year 2 and Year 3 reports. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 18 JAC-CEN-DEL COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.334 states in part: "Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal entity records pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report or, for Federal awards that are renewed quarterly or annually, from the date of the submission of the quarterly or annual financial report, respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity in the case of a subrecipient. . . ." 2 CFR 200.302(b) states in part: "The financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for the following . . . (2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in §§ 200.328 and 200.329. . . ." 34 CFR 76.722 states: "A State may require a subgrantee to submit reports in a manner and format that assists the State in complying with the requirements under 34 CFR 76.720 and in carrying out other responsibilities under the program." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation. Due to turnover in the position responsible for review, reports were not reviewed to detect errors prior to submission. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, the ESSER III, Year 2 and Year 3 reports were not supported by the School Corporation's records. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 19 JAC-CEN-DEL COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure that all reports are supported by the School Corporation's records. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-003 Subject: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - Reporting Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listings Number: 84.425U Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): S425U210013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2022-002. Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not designed or implemented at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. The School Corporation had not designed, nor implemented, a system of internal controls to ensure that the annual Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER) Data Collection reports (Reports) were complete and accurately submitted. The Reports were prepared by one employee without a documented oversight, review, or approval process in place to prevent, or detect and correct, errors. Due to the lack of effective internal controls, two of the five Reports submitted during the audit period were not supported by the School Corporation's records. The following errors were noted: For the ESSER III, Year 2 report, which covered the period July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022, total expenses reported were understated by $369,741. For the ESSER III, Year 3 report, which covered the period July 1, 2022 to June 30, 2023, total expenses reported for Property - Mandatory Subgrant Funds - Exclusive of Learning Loss Set-Aside were understated by $519,504. Total expenses reported for Supplies - Mandatory Subgrant Funds - Learning Loss Set-Aside were overstated by $11,260. The lack of internal controls was a systemic issue throughout the audit period. Noncompliance was isolated to the ESSER III, Year 2 and Year 3 reports. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 18 JAC-CEN-DEL COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.334 states in part: "Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal entity records pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report or, for Federal awards that are renewed quarterly or annually, from the date of the submission of the quarterly or annual financial report, respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity in the case of a subrecipient. . . ." 2 CFR 200.302(b) states in part: "The financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for the following . . . (2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in §§ 200.328 and 200.329. . . ." 34 CFR 76.722 states: "A State may require a subgrantee to submit reports in a manner and format that assists the State in complying with the requirements under 34 CFR 76.720 and in carrying out other responsibilities under the program." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation. Due to turnover in the position responsible for review, reports were not reviewed to detect errors prior to submission. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, the ESSER III, Year 2 and Year 3 reports were not supported by the School Corporation's records. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 19 JAC-CEN-DEL COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure that all reports are supported by the School Corporation's records. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
Finding 2024-002: Internal control deficiency and noncompliance over Reporting related to performance reports. Identification of the federal program: Assistance Listing Number 11.028 • Connecting Minority Communities Pilot Program • U.S. Department of Commerce • Federal award identification number: 06-09-C13050 • Federal award year: January 15, 2023 through January 14, 2025 Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory or other citation): Title 2, Subtitle A, Chapter II, Part 200, Subpart D, 200.303 – Internal controls. The recipient and subrecipient must: (a) Establish, document, and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the recipient or subrecipient is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should align with the guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control-Integrated Framework” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The terms and conditions of the Federal award requires the following: Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. 302.9(b)(1), each award recipient will be required to submit a technical progress report on a semi-annual and annual basis for the periods ending March 31 and September 30 of each year. Semi-annual performance reports will be due within 30 days after the end of the reporting period. Technical progress reports shall contain information as prescribed in 2 C.F.R. § 200.329 and Department of Commerce Financial Assistance Standard Terms and Conditions dated November 12, 2020, Section A.01. Condition: During our testing over the Reporting compliance requirement, we observed management did not have effective internal controls in place to ensure performance reports were submitted by the deadline and completed correctly. Cause: Management did not have effective internal controls in place over the compliance requirement as stated in the criteria or specific requirement section above. Effect or potential effect: Management did not submit the required performance reports by the deadline and certain key line items were not completed correctly. Without effective internal controls, other reports could be submitted after the deadline and/or completed incorrectly in the future. Questioned costs: None. Context: During our testing over Reporting, we obtained a listing of two performance reports and tested both performance reports. We observed the following: • Management did not submit the required performance reports by the deadline. The entity is required to submit a semi-annual performance report with deadlines of April 30 and October 30 of each year. We observed all reports were submitted after the deadline. • The April 30, 2024 performance report key line items related to the budgeted amounts were from the original financial assistance award signed on January 11, 2023 versus the amendment to the financial assistance award signed on June 29, 2023. • The April 30, 2024 performance report key line items related to the personnel and fringe benefits costs were calculated entirely based on the latest fringe benefit rate of 44% versus using the prior year rate of 35% for the time period in effect which resulted in a misclassification between personnel and fringe benefits costs of $6,054. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommend that management develop and implement effective internal controls to ensure performance reports were submitted by the deadline and completed correctly. Views of responsible officials: Management will meet with the Principal Investigator and provide additional training emphasizing the importance of timely submission and accuracy of grant documentation and reports. In addition, management will monitor submission deadlines and follow-up with the Principal Investigator to ensure timely filing.
FINDING 2024-001 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Reporting Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY2023, FY2024, FY23/FY24 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Finding: Material Weakness INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 15 SOUTH VERMILLION COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Condition and Context There were no internal controls in place to ensure that the School Corporation complied with the reporting requirements. The reimbursement request reports were prepared and submitted by the Food Service Director without any oversight, review, or approval process to ensure accuracy of the reports. There was no oversight to verify that the number of meals served matched the report filed. The lack of internal controls was systemic throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.301 states in part: "(a) The Federal awarding agency must measure the recipient's performance to show achievement of program goals and objectives, share lessons learned, improve program outcomes, and foster adoption of promising practices. Program goals and objectives should be derived from program planning and design. See § 200.202 for more information. Where appropriate, the Federal award may include specific program goals, indicators, targets, baseline data, data collection, or expected outcomes (such as outputs, or services performance or public impacts of any of these) with an expected timeline for accomplishment. Where applicable, this should also include any performance measures or independent sources of data that may be used to measure progress. The Federal awarding agency will determine how performance progress is measured, which may differ by program. Performance measurement progress must be both measured and reported. See § 200.329 for more information on monitoring program performance. The Federal awarding agency may include program-specific requirements, as applicable. These requirements must be aligned, to the extent permitted by law, with the Federal awarding agency strategic goals, strategic objectives or performance goals that are relevant to the program. See also OMB Circular A-11, Preparation, Submission, and Execution of the Budget Part 6. (b) The Federal awarding agency should provide recipients with clear performance goals, indicators, targets, and baseline data as described in § 200.211. Performance reporting frequency and content should be established to not only allow the Federal awarding agency to understand the recipient progress but also to facilitate identification of promising practices among recipients and build the evidence upon which the Federal awarding agency's program and performance decisions are made. See § 200.328 for more information on reporting program performance. . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 16 SOUTH VERMILLION COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Cause Management had not developed or implemented a system of internal controls that would have ensured that the monthly reimbursement request filed matched the meals served per the cafeteria software. Effect The failure to establish an effective internal control system could have resulted in the reimbursement request being filed for the wrong number of meals served. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management strengthen its system of internal controls to ensure that the reporting of meals served is verified for accuracy. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-001 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Reporting Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY2023, FY2024, FY23/FY24 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Finding: Material Weakness INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 15 SOUTH VERMILLION COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Condition and Context There were no internal controls in place to ensure that the School Corporation complied with the reporting requirements. The reimbursement request reports were prepared and submitted by the Food Service Director without any oversight, review, or approval process to ensure accuracy of the reports. There was no oversight to verify that the number of meals served matched the report filed. The lack of internal controls was systemic throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.301 states in part: "(a) The Federal awarding agency must measure the recipient's performance to show achievement of program goals and objectives, share lessons learned, improve program outcomes, and foster adoption of promising practices. Program goals and objectives should be derived from program planning and design. See § 200.202 for more information. Where appropriate, the Federal award may include specific program goals, indicators, targets, baseline data, data collection, or expected outcomes (such as outputs, or services performance or public impacts of any of these) with an expected timeline for accomplishment. Where applicable, this should also include any performance measures or independent sources of data that may be used to measure progress. The Federal awarding agency will determine how performance progress is measured, which may differ by program. Performance measurement progress must be both measured and reported. See § 200.329 for more information on monitoring program performance. The Federal awarding agency may include program-specific requirements, as applicable. These requirements must be aligned, to the extent permitted by law, with the Federal awarding agency strategic goals, strategic objectives or performance goals that are relevant to the program. See also OMB Circular A-11, Preparation, Submission, and Execution of the Budget Part 6. (b) The Federal awarding agency should provide recipients with clear performance goals, indicators, targets, and baseline data as described in § 200.211. Performance reporting frequency and content should be established to not only allow the Federal awarding agency to understand the recipient progress but also to facilitate identification of promising practices among recipients and build the evidence upon which the Federal awarding agency's program and performance decisions are made. See § 200.328 for more information on reporting program performance. . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 16 SOUTH VERMILLION COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Cause Management had not developed or implemented a system of internal controls that would have ensured that the monthly reimbursement request filed matched the meals served per the cafeteria software. Effect The failure to establish an effective internal control system could have resulted in the reimbursement request being filed for the wrong number of meals served. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management strengthen its system of internal controls to ensure that the reporting of meals served is verified for accuracy. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-001 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Reporting Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY2023, FY2024, FY23/FY24 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Finding: Material Weakness INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 15 SOUTH VERMILLION COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Condition and Context There were no internal controls in place to ensure that the School Corporation complied with the reporting requirements. The reimbursement request reports were prepared and submitted by the Food Service Director without any oversight, review, or approval process to ensure accuracy of the reports. There was no oversight to verify that the number of meals served matched the report filed. The lack of internal controls was systemic throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.301 states in part: "(a) The Federal awarding agency must measure the recipient's performance to show achievement of program goals and objectives, share lessons learned, improve program outcomes, and foster adoption of promising practices. Program goals and objectives should be derived from program planning and design. See § 200.202 for more information. Where appropriate, the Federal award may include specific program goals, indicators, targets, baseline data, data collection, or expected outcomes (such as outputs, or services performance or public impacts of any of these) with an expected timeline for accomplishment. Where applicable, this should also include any performance measures or independent sources of data that may be used to measure progress. The Federal awarding agency will determine how performance progress is measured, which may differ by program. Performance measurement progress must be both measured and reported. See § 200.329 for more information on monitoring program performance. The Federal awarding agency may include program-specific requirements, as applicable. These requirements must be aligned, to the extent permitted by law, with the Federal awarding agency strategic goals, strategic objectives or performance goals that are relevant to the program. See also OMB Circular A-11, Preparation, Submission, and Execution of the Budget Part 6. (b) The Federal awarding agency should provide recipients with clear performance goals, indicators, targets, and baseline data as described in § 200.211. Performance reporting frequency and content should be established to not only allow the Federal awarding agency to understand the recipient progress but also to facilitate identification of promising practices among recipients and build the evidence upon which the Federal awarding agency's program and performance decisions are made. See § 200.328 for more information on reporting program performance. . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 16 SOUTH VERMILLION COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Cause Management had not developed or implemented a system of internal controls that would have ensured that the monthly reimbursement request filed matched the meals served per the cafeteria software. Effect The failure to establish an effective internal control system could have resulted in the reimbursement request being filed for the wrong number of meals served. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management strengthen its system of internal controls to ensure that the reporting of meals served is verified for accuracy. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-001 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Reporting Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY2023, FY2024, FY23/FY24 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Finding: Material Weakness INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 15 SOUTH VERMILLION COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Condition and Context There were no internal controls in place to ensure that the School Corporation complied with the reporting requirements. The reimbursement request reports were prepared and submitted by the Food Service Director without any oversight, review, or approval process to ensure accuracy of the reports. There was no oversight to verify that the number of meals served matched the report filed. The lack of internal controls was systemic throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.301 states in part: "(a) The Federal awarding agency must measure the recipient's performance to show achievement of program goals and objectives, share lessons learned, improve program outcomes, and foster adoption of promising practices. Program goals and objectives should be derived from program planning and design. See § 200.202 for more information. Where appropriate, the Federal award may include specific program goals, indicators, targets, baseline data, data collection, or expected outcomes (such as outputs, or services performance or public impacts of any of these) with an expected timeline for accomplishment. Where applicable, this should also include any performance measures or independent sources of data that may be used to measure progress. The Federal awarding agency will determine how performance progress is measured, which may differ by program. Performance measurement progress must be both measured and reported. See § 200.329 for more information on monitoring program performance. The Federal awarding agency may include program-specific requirements, as applicable. These requirements must be aligned, to the extent permitted by law, with the Federal awarding agency strategic goals, strategic objectives or performance goals that are relevant to the program. See also OMB Circular A-11, Preparation, Submission, and Execution of the Budget Part 6. (b) The Federal awarding agency should provide recipients with clear performance goals, indicators, targets, and baseline data as described in § 200.211. Performance reporting frequency and content should be established to not only allow the Federal awarding agency to understand the recipient progress but also to facilitate identification of promising practices among recipients and build the evidence upon which the Federal awarding agency's program and performance decisions are made. See § 200.328 for more information on reporting program performance. . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 16 SOUTH VERMILLION COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Cause Management had not developed or implemented a system of internal controls that would have ensured that the monthly reimbursement request filed matched the meals served per the cafeteria software. Effect The failure to establish an effective internal control system could have resulted in the reimbursement request being filed for the wrong number of meals served. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management strengthen its system of internal controls to ensure that the reporting of meals served is verified for accuracy. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-001 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Reporting Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY2023, FY2024, FY23/FY24 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Finding: Material Weakness INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 15 SOUTH VERMILLION COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Condition and Context There were no internal controls in place to ensure that the School Corporation complied with the reporting requirements. The reimbursement request reports were prepared and submitted by the Food Service Director without any oversight, review, or approval process to ensure accuracy of the reports. There was no oversight to verify that the number of meals served matched the report filed. The lack of internal controls was systemic throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.301 states in part: "(a) The Federal awarding agency must measure the recipient's performance to show achievement of program goals and objectives, share lessons learned, improve program outcomes, and foster adoption of promising practices. Program goals and objectives should be derived from program planning and design. See § 200.202 for more information. Where appropriate, the Federal award may include specific program goals, indicators, targets, baseline data, data collection, or expected outcomes (such as outputs, or services performance or public impacts of any of these) with an expected timeline for accomplishment. Where applicable, this should also include any performance measures or independent sources of data that may be used to measure progress. The Federal awarding agency will determine how performance progress is measured, which may differ by program. Performance measurement progress must be both measured and reported. See § 200.329 for more information on monitoring program performance. The Federal awarding agency may include program-specific requirements, as applicable. These requirements must be aligned, to the extent permitted by law, with the Federal awarding agency strategic goals, strategic objectives or performance goals that are relevant to the program. See also OMB Circular A-11, Preparation, Submission, and Execution of the Budget Part 6. (b) The Federal awarding agency should provide recipients with clear performance goals, indicators, targets, and baseline data as described in § 200.211. Performance reporting frequency and content should be established to not only allow the Federal awarding agency to understand the recipient progress but also to facilitate identification of promising practices among recipients and build the evidence upon which the Federal awarding agency's program and performance decisions are made. See § 200.328 for more information on reporting program performance. . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 16 SOUTH VERMILLION COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Cause Management had not developed or implemented a system of internal controls that would have ensured that the monthly reimbursement request filed matched the meals served per the cafeteria software. Effect The failure to establish an effective internal control system could have resulted in the reimbursement request being filed for the wrong number of meals served. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management strengthen its system of internal controls to ensure that the reporting of meals served is verified for accuracy. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-001 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Reporting Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY2023, FY2024, FY23/FY24 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Finding: Material Weakness INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 15 SOUTH VERMILLION COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Condition and Context There were no internal controls in place to ensure that the School Corporation complied with the reporting requirements. The reimbursement request reports were prepared and submitted by the Food Service Director without any oversight, review, or approval process to ensure accuracy of the reports. There was no oversight to verify that the number of meals served matched the report filed. The lack of internal controls was systemic throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.301 states in part: "(a) The Federal awarding agency must measure the recipient's performance to show achievement of program goals and objectives, share lessons learned, improve program outcomes, and foster adoption of promising practices. Program goals and objectives should be derived from program planning and design. See § 200.202 for more information. Where appropriate, the Federal award may include specific program goals, indicators, targets, baseline data, data collection, or expected outcomes (such as outputs, or services performance or public impacts of any of these) with an expected timeline for accomplishment. Where applicable, this should also include any performance measures or independent sources of data that may be used to measure progress. The Federal awarding agency will determine how performance progress is measured, which may differ by program. Performance measurement progress must be both measured and reported. See § 200.329 for more information on monitoring program performance. The Federal awarding agency may include program-specific requirements, as applicable. These requirements must be aligned, to the extent permitted by law, with the Federal awarding agency strategic goals, strategic objectives or performance goals that are relevant to the program. See also OMB Circular A-11, Preparation, Submission, and Execution of the Budget Part 6. (b) The Federal awarding agency should provide recipients with clear performance goals, indicators, targets, and baseline data as described in § 200.211. Performance reporting frequency and content should be established to not only allow the Federal awarding agency to understand the recipient progress but also to facilitate identification of promising practices among recipients and build the evidence upon which the Federal awarding agency's program and performance decisions are made. See § 200.328 for more information on reporting program performance. . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 16 SOUTH VERMILLION COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Cause Management had not developed or implemented a system of internal controls that would have ensured that the monthly reimbursement request filed matched the meals served per the cafeteria software. Effect The failure to establish an effective internal control system could have resulted in the reimbursement request being filed for the wrong number of meals served. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management strengthen its system of internal controls to ensure that the reporting of meals served is verified for accuracy. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-003 Subject: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - Reporting Federal Agency: Indiana Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stablization Fund Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.425C, 84.425D, 84.425U Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425C200018, S425D200013, S425D210013, S425U210013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context The School Corporation was required to submit annual data reports to the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE) via JotForm, a form/report builder. Data to be submitted included, but was not limited to, current period expenditures, prior period expenditures, and expenditures per activity. During the audit period, the School Corporation submitted one ESSER I report, two ESSER II reports, and two ESSER III reports for a total of five reports. The annual data reports were compiled, prepared, and submitted by the Treasurer without an oversight or review process in place to prevent, or detect and correct, errors. In addition, the five annual data reports were not supported by the School Corporation's records. The documentation used to prepare the reports was not retained by the School Corporation and the ledger activity for the time period of each report did not agree to the data submitted. As such, the Indiana State Board of Accounts could not verify the information submitted to the IDOE was accurate or complete. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.334 states in part: "Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal entity records pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report or, for the Federal awards that are renewed quarterly or annual, from the date of submission of the quarterly or annual financial report, respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity in the case of a subrecipient. . . ." 2 CFR 200.302(b) states in part: "The financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for the following . . . (2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in §§ 200.328 and 200.329. . . ." (3) Records that identify adequately the source and application of funds for federally funded activities. These records must contain information pertaining to Federal awards, authorizations, obligations, unobligated balances, assets, expenditures, income and interest and be supported by source documentation. . . ." 34 CFR 76.722 states: "A State may require a subgrantee to submit reports in a manner and format that assists the State in complying with the requirements under 34 CFR 76.720 and in carrying out other responsibilities under the program." 34 CFR 76.731 states: "A State and a subgrantee shall keep records to show its compliance with program requirements." Cause A proper system of internal controls, which include segregation of key functions, was not established by management of the School Corporation to ensure that reports filed were supported by School Corporation records and had an independent review, for accuracy and completeness, prior to submission. Effect Without a proper system of internal controls in place that operated effectively, the School Corporation submitted reports that were not supported by School Corporation records. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure that documentation utilized in the preparation of the reports is maintained and that there is an independent review of the reports for accuracy and completeness prior to submission. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-003 Subject: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - Reporting Federal Agency: Indiana Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stablization Fund Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.425C, 84.425D, 84.425U Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425C200018, S425D200013, S425D210013, S425U210013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context The School Corporation was required to submit annual data reports to the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE) via JotForm, a form/report builder. Data to be submitted included, but was not limited to, current period expenditures, prior period expenditures, and expenditures per activity. During the audit period, the School Corporation submitted one ESSER I report, two ESSER II reports, and two ESSER III reports for a total of five reports. The annual data reports were compiled, prepared, and submitted by the Treasurer without an oversight or review process in place to prevent, or detect and correct, errors. In addition, the five annual data reports were not supported by the School Corporation's records. The documentation used to prepare the reports was not retained by the School Corporation and the ledger activity for the time period of each report did not agree to the data submitted. As such, the Indiana State Board of Accounts could not verify the information submitted to the IDOE was accurate or complete. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.334 states in part: "Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal entity records pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report or, for the Federal awards that are renewed quarterly or annual, from the date of submission of the quarterly or annual financial report, respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity in the case of a subrecipient. . . ." 2 CFR 200.302(b) states in part: "The financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for the following . . . (2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in §§ 200.328 and 200.329. . . ." (3) Records that identify adequately the source and application of funds for federally funded activities. These records must contain information pertaining to Federal awards, authorizations, obligations, unobligated balances, assets, expenditures, income and interest and be supported by source documentation. . . ." 34 CFR 76.722 states: "A State may require a subgrantee to submit reports in a manner and format that assists the State in complying with the requirements under 34 CFR 76.720 and in carrying out other responsibilities under the program." 34 CFR 76.731 states: "A State and a subgrantee shall keep records to show its compliance with program requirements." Cause A proper system of internal controls, which include segregation of key functions, was not established by management of the School Corporation to ensure that reports filed were supported by School Corporation records and had an independent review, for accuracy and completeness, prior to submission. Effect Without a proper system of internal controls in place that operated effectively, the School Corporation submitted reports that were not supported by School Corporation records. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure that documentation utilized in the preparation of the reports is maintained and that there is an independent review of the reports for accuracy and completeness prior to submission. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-003 Subject: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - Reporting Federal Agency: Indiana Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stablization Fund Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.425C, 84.425D, 84.425U Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425C200018, S425D200013, S425D210013, S425U210013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context The School Corporation was required to submit annual data reports to the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE) via JotForm, a form/report builder. Data to be submitted included, but was not limited to, current period expenditures, prior period expenditures, and expenditures per activity. During the audit period, the School Corporation submitted one ESSER I report, two ESSER II reports, and two ESSER III reports for a total of five reports. The annual data reports were compiled, prepared, and submitted by the Treasurer without an oversight or review process in place to prevent, or detect and correct, errors. In addition, the five annual data reports were not supported by the School Corporation's records. The documentation used to prepare the reports was not retained by the School Corporation and the ledger activity for the time period of each report did not agree to the data submitted. As such, the Indiana State Board of Accounts could not verify the information submitted to the IDOE was accurate or complete. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.334 states in part: "Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal entity records pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report or, for the Federal awards that are renewed quarterly or annual, from the date of submission of the quarterly or annual financial report, respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity in the case of a subrecipient. . . ." 2 CFR 200.302(b) states in part: "The financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for the following . . . (2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in §§ 200.328 and 200.329. . . ." (3) Records that identify adequately the source and application of funds for federally funded activities. These records must contain information pertaining to Federal awards, authorizations, obligations, unobligated balances, assets, expenditures, income and interest and be supported by source documentation. . . ." 34 CFR 76.722 states: "A State may require a subgrantee to submit reports in a manner and format that assists the State in complying with the requirements under 34 CFR 76.720 and in carrying out other responsibilities under the program." 34 CFR 76.731 states: "A State and a subgrantee shall keep records to show its compliance with program requirements." Cause A proper system of internal controls, which include segregation of key functions, was not established by management of the School Corporation to ensure that reports filed were supported by School Corporation records and had an independent review, for accuracy and completeness, prior to submission. Effect Without a proper system of internal controls in place that operated effectively, the School Corporation submitted reports that were not supported by School Corporation records. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure that documentation utilized in the preparation of the reports is maintained and that there is an independent review of the reports for accuracy and completeness prior to submission. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-003 Subject: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - Reporting Federal Agency: Indiana Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stablization Fund Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.425C, 84.425D, 84.425U Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425C200018, S425D200013, S425D210013, S425U210013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context The School Corporation was required to submit annual data reports to the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE) via JotForm, a form/report builder. Data to be submitted included, but was not limited to, current period expenditures, prior period expenditures, and expenditures per activity. During the audit period, the School Corporation submitted one ESSER I report, two ESSER II reports, and two ESSER III reports for a total of five reports. The annual data reports were compiled, prepared, and submitted by the Treasurer without an oversight or review process in place to prevent, or detect and correct, errors. In addition, the five annual data reports were not supported by the School Corporation's records. The documentation used to prepare the reports was not retained by the School Corporation and the ledger activity for the time period of each report did not agree to the data submitted. As such, the Indiana State Board of Accounts could not verify the information submitted to the IDOE was accurate or complete. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.334 states in part: "Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal entity records pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report or, for the Federal awards that are renewed quarterly or annual, from the date of submission of the quarterly or annual financial report, respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity in the case of a subrecipient. . . ." 2 CFR 200.302(b) states in part: "The financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for the following . . . (2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in §§ 200.328 and 200.329. . . ." (3) Records that identify adequately the source and application of funds for federally funded activities. These records must contain information pertaining to Federal awards, authorizations, obligations, unobligated balances, assets, expenditures, income and interest and be supported by source documentation. . . ." 34 CFR 76.722 states: "A State may require a subgrantee to submit reports in a manner and format that assists the State in complying with the requirements under 34 CFR 76.720 and in carrying out other responsibilities under the program." 34 CFR 76.731 states: "A State and a subgrantee shall keep records to show its compliance with program requirements." Cause A proper system of internal controls, which include segregation of key functions, was not established by management of the School Corporation to ensure that reports filed were supported by School Corporation records and had an independent review, for accuracy and completeness, prior to submission. Effect Without a proper system of internal controls in place that operated effectively, the School Corporation submitted reports that were not supported by School Corporation records. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure that documentation utilized in the preparation of the reports is maintained and that there is an independent review of the reports for accuracy and completeness prior to submission. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-003 Subject: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - Reporting Federal Agency: Indiana Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stablization Fund Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.425C, 84.425D, 84.425U Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425C200018, S425D200013, S425D210013, S425U210013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context The School Corporation was required to submit annual data reports to the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE) via JotForm, a form/report builder. Data to be submitted included, but was not limited to, current period expenditures, prior period expenditures, and expenditures per activity. During the audit period, the School Corporation submitted one ESSER I report, two ESSER II reports, and two ESSER III reports for a total of five reports. The annual data reports were compiled, prepared, and submitted by the Treasurer without an oversight or review process in place to prevent, or detect and correct, errors. In addition, the five annual data reports were not supported by the School Corporation's records. The documentation used to prepare the reports was not retained by the School Corporation and the ledger activity for the time period of each report did not agree to the data submitted. As such, the Indiana State Board of Accounts could not verify the information submitted to the IDOE was accurate or complete. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.334 states in part: "Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal entity records pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report or, for the Federal awards that are renewed quarterly or annual, from the date of submission of the quarterly or annual financial report, respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity in the case of a subrecipient. . . ." 2 CFR 200.302(b) states in part: "The financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for the following . . . (2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in §§ 200.328 and 200.329. . . ." (3) Records that identify adequately the source and application of funds for federally funded activities. These records must contain information pertaining to Federal awards, authorizations, obligations, unobligated balances, assets, expenditures, income and interest and be supported by source documentation. . . ." 34 CFR 76.722 states: "A State may require a subgrantee to submit reports in a manner and format that assists the State in complying with the requirements under 34 CFR 76.720 and in carrying out other responsibilities under the program." 34 CFR 76.731 states: "A State and a subgrantee shall keep records to show its compliance with program requirements." Cause A proper system of internal controls, which include segregation of key functions, was not established by management of the School Corporation to ensure that reports filed were supported by School Corporation records and had an independent review, for accuracy and completeness, prior to submission. Effect Without a proper system of internal controls in place that operated effectively, the School Corporation submitted reports that were not supported by School Corporation records. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure that documentation utilized in the preparation of the reports is maintained and that there is an independent review of the reports for accuracy and completeness prior to submission. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-003 Subject: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - Reporting Federal Agency: Indiana Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stablization Fund Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.425C, 84.425D, 84.425U Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425C200018, S425D200013, S425D210013, S425U210013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context The School Corporation was required to submit annual data reports to the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE) via JotForm, a form/report builder. Data to be submitted included, but was not limited to, current period expenditures, prior period expenditures, and expenditures per activity. During the audit period, the School Corporation submitted one ESSER I report, two ESSER II reports, and two ESSER III reports for a total of five reports. The annual data reports were compiled, prepared, and submitted by the Treasurer without an oversight or review process in place to prevent, or detect and correct, errors. In addition, the five annual data reports were not supported by the School Corporation's records. The documentation used to prepare the reports was not retained by the School Corporation and the ledger activity for the time period of each report did not agree to the data submitted. As such, the Indiana State Board of Accounts could not verify the information submitted to the IDOE was accurate or complete. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.334 states in part: "Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal entity records pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report or, for the Federal awards that are renewed quarterly or annual, from the date of submission of the quarterly or annual financial report, respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity in the case of a subrecipient. . . ." 2 CFR 200.302(b) states in part: "The financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for the following . . . (2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in §§ 200.328 and 200.329. . . ." (3) Records that identify adequately the source and application of funds for federally funded activities. These records must contain information pertaining to Federal awards, authorizations, obligations, unobligated balances, assets, expenditures, income and interest and be supported by source documentation. . . ." 34 CFR 76.722 states: "A State may require a subgrantee to submit reports in a manner and format that assists the State in complying with the requirements under 34 CFR 76.720 and in carrying out other responsibilities under the program." 34 CFR 76.731 states: "A State and a subgrantee shall keep records to show its compliance with program requirements." Cause A proper system of internal controls, which include segregation of key functions, was not established by management of the School Corporation to ensure that reports filed were supported by School Corporation records and had an independent review, for accuracy and completeness, prior to submission. Effect Without a proper system of internal controls in place that operated effectively, the School Corporation submitted reports that were not supported by School Corporation records. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure that documentation utilized in the preparation of the reports is maintained and that there is an independent review of the reports for accuracy and completeness prior to submission. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
Connecting Minority Communities Pilot Program, ALN 11.028 U.S. Department of Commerce Program Year 2023 - 2024 Criteria or Specific Requirement - Reporting 2 CFR 200.329 Condition - The University was unable to substantiate amounts reported on semi-annual performance reports and an amount reported was for the incorrect reporting period. Questioned costs - None Context - Out of the population of two semi-annual performance reporting requirements for the fiscal a year, a sample of one report was selected for testing. Our sample was not, and was not intended to be statistically valid. For three agency specific key line items tested, the University was unable to provide documentation to substantiate the amounts reported. For one agency specific key line item tested, the amount reported was for the incorrect reporting period. Effect - Certain agency specific key line items reported were not substantiated with appropriate documentation and one key line item was reported for the incorrect reporting period. Cause - The University did not maintain supporting documentation for amounts reported in the semi-annual performance report and improper report parameters were used to generate amounts reported. Identification as a repeat finding - N/A Recommendation - The University should maintain adequate supporting documentation used in the preparation of performance reports and should review the supporting documentation used in preparation of the reports to ensure it is for the appropriate reporting period.
FINDING 2024-005 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Reporting Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 2022-2023, 2023-2024 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2022-003. Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not designed or implemented at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. Monthly Sponsor Claims for Reimbursement (Claims) were submitted to the Indiana Department of Education based upon the number of meals served for the month. The Claims were prepared by the Food Service Manager or food service management company (FSMC) employee. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 26 GARY COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) The School Corporation maintained manual meal count records. A point-of-sale system (POS) was used for some schools in some months, but it was not consistent. The reports from the POS identified second student meals and staff meals that were included in the amounts claimed for reimbursement. For all three Claims tested, there were differences between the Claims submitted and the School Corporation's detail meal count reports, resulting in over and under reporting and reimbursement. The Claims tested contained the following errors: The December 2022 claim reported 41 more meals served than the eligible meals per the School Corporation's detail meal count reports, which resulted in overclaimed reimbursement totaling $109. Of this total, $59 (22 meals) was due to improperly claiming second student or staff meals. The March 2023 claim in total reported more meals served than the eligible meals per the School Corporation's detail meal count reports, which resulted in overclaimed meals totaling $4,254. Of this total, $4,144 was due to claiming second student or staff meals, totaling $1,035, for breakfast and lunch. The School Corporation also underclaimed snacks by 421, which resulted in under reimbursement of $455. Finally, the claim also contained overcount errors of 136 meals, resulting in overclaimed reimbursement of $565. The August 2023 claim reported fewer meals served than the eligible meals per the School Corporation's detail meal count reports, which resulted in underclaimed meals in net totaling $11,474. The School Corporation did not claim meals served on August 31, 2023, totaling 3,879 meals. This resulted in underclaimed meal reimbursement totaling $13,767. The School Corporation also claimed 141 second student and staff meals, which resulted in overclaimed reimbursement totaling $480. Finally, the claim also contained overcount errors of 497 meals, resulting in overclaimed reimbursement of $1,813. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.302(b) states in part: "The financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for the following . . . (2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in §§ 200.328 and 200.329. . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 27 GARY COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Cause The School Corporation did not have effective internal control procedures in place over the Claims submitted. The Claims did not contain evidence of an oversight or review process in place to prevent, or detect and correct, errors. The Claims were prepared based upon a summary sheet prepared by the FSMC employee and were not verified back to the source records. Effect Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirement could result in the repayment of federal funds. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures over the preparation and review of claims to ensure appropriate reviews, approval, and oversight are taking place. Additionally, management should develop policies and procedures to ensure that the FSMC provides the School Corporation with complete and accurate information for all claim submissions. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-005 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Reporting Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 2022-2023, 2023-2024 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2022-003. Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not designed or implemented at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. Monthly Sponsor Claims for Reimbursement (Claims) were submitted to the Indiana Department of Education based upon the number of meals served for the month. The Claims were prepared by the Food Service Manager or food service management company (FSMC) employee. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 26 GARY COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) The School Corporation maintained manual meal count records. A point-of-sale system (POS) was used for some schools in some months, but it was not consistent. The reports from the POS identified second student meals and staff meals that were included in the amounts claimed for reimbursement. For all three Claims tested, there were differences between the Claims submitted and the School Corporation's detail meal count reports, resulting in over and under reporting and reimbursement. The Claims tested contained the following errors: The December 2022 claim reported 41 more meals served than the eligible meals per the School Corporation's detail meal count reports, which resulted in overclaimed reimbursement totaling $109. Of this total, $59 (22 meals) was due to improperly claiming second student or staff meals. The March 2023 claim in total reported more meals served than the eligible meals per the School Corporation's detail meal count reports, which resulted in overclaimed meals totaling $4,254. Of this total, $4,144 was due to claiming second student or staff meals, totaling $1,035, for breakfast and lunch. The School Corporation also underclaimed snacks by 421, which resulted in under reimbursement of $455. Finally, the claim also contained overcount errors of 136 meals, resulting in overclaimed reimbursement of $565. The August 2023 claim reported fewer meals served than the eligible meals per the School Corporation's detail meal count reports, which resulted in underclaimed meals in net totaling $11,474. The School Corporation did not claim meals served on August 31, 2023, totaling 3,879 meals. This resulted in underclaimed meal reimbursement totaling $13,767. The School Corporation also claimed 141 second student and staff meals, which resulted in overclaimed reimbursement totaling $480. Finally, the claim also contained overcount errors of 497 meals, resulting in overclaimed reimbursement of $1,813. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.302(b) states in part: "The financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for the following . . . (2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in §§ 200.328 and 200.329. . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 27 GARY COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Cause The School Corporation did not have effective internal control procedures in place over the Claims submitted. The Claims did not contain evidence of an oversight or review process in place to prevent, or detect and correct, errors. The Claims were prepared based upon a summary sheet prepared by the FSMC employee and were not verified back to the source records. Effect Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirement could result in the repayment of federal funds. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures over the preparation and review of claims to ensure appropriate reviews, approval, and oversight are taking place. Additionally, management should develop policies and procedures to ensure that the FSMC provides the School Corporation with complete and accurate information for all claim submissions. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-005 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Reporting Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 2022-2023, 2023-2024 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2022-003. Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not designed or implemented at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. Monthly Sponsor Claims for Reimbursement (Claims) were submitted to the Indiana Department of Education based upon the number of meals served for the month. The Claims were prepared by the Food Service Manager or food service management company (FSMC) employee. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 26 GARY COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) The School Corporation maintained manual meal count records. A point-of-sale system (POS) was used for some schools in some months, but it was not consistent. The reports from the POS identified second student meals and staff meals that were included in the amounts claimed for reimbursement. For all three Claims tested, there were differences between the Claims submitted and the School Corporation's detail meal count reports, resulting in over and under reporting and reimbursement. The Claims tested contained the following errors: The December 2022 claim reported 41 more meals served than the eligible meals per the School Corporation's detail meal count reports, which resulted in overclaimed reimbursement totaling $109. Of this total, $59 (22 meals) was due to improperly claiming second student or staff meals. The March 2023 claim in total reported more meals served than the eligible meals per the School Corporation's detail meal count reports, which resulted in overclaimed meals totaling $4,254. Of this total, $4,144 was due to claiming second student or staff meals, totaling $1,035, for breakfast and lunch. The School Corporation also underclaimed snacks by 421, which resulted in under reimbursement of $455. Finally, the claim also contained overcount errors of 136 meals, resulting in overclaimed reimbursement of $565. The August 2023 claim reported fewer meals served than the eligible meals per the School Corporation's detail meal count reports, which resulted in underclaimed meals in net totaling $11,474. The School Corporation did not claim meals served on August 31, 2023, totaling 3,879 meals. This resulted in underclaimed meal reimbursement totaling $13,767. The School Corporation also claimed 141 second student and staff meals, which resulted in overclaimed reimbursement totaling $480. Finally, the claim also contained overcount errors of 497 meals, resulting in overclaimed reimbursement of $1,813. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.302(b) states in part: "The financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for the following . . . (2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in §§ 200.328 and 200.329. . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 27 GARY COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Cause The School Corporation did not have effective internal control procedures in place over the Claims submitted. The Claims did not contain evidence of an oversight or review process in place to prevent, or detect and correct, errors. The Claims were prepared based upon a summary sheet prepared by the FSMC employee and were not verified back to the source records. Effect Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirement could result in the repayment of federal funds. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures over the preparation and review of claims to ensure appropriate reviews, approval, and oversight are taking place. Additionally, management should develop policies and procedures to ensure that the FSMC provides the School Corporation with complete and accurate information for all claim submissions. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-005 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Reporting Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 2022-2023, 2023-2024 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2022-003. Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not designed or implemented at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. Monthly Sponsor Claims for Reimbursement (Claims) were submitted to the Indiana Department of Education based upon the number of meals served for the month. The Claims were prepared by the Food Service Manager or food service management company (FSMC) employee. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 26 GARY COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) The School Corporation maintained manual meal count records. A point-of-sale system (POS) was used for some schools in some months, but it was not consistent. The reports from the POS identified second student meals and staff meals that were included in the amounts claimed for reimbursement. For all three Claims tested, there were differences between the Claims submitted and the School Corporation's detail meal count reports, resulting in over and under reporting and reimbursement. The Claims tested contained the following errors: The December 2022 claim reported 41 more meals served than the eligible meals per the School Corporation's detail meal count reports, which resulted in overclaimed reimbursement totaling $109. Of this total, $59 (22 meals) was due to improperly claiming second student or staff meals. The March 2023 claim in total reported more meals served than the eligible meals per the School Corporation's detail meal count reports, which resulted in overclaimed meals totaling $4,254. Of this total, $4,144 was due to claiming second student or staff meals, totaling $1,035, for breakfast and lunch. The School Corporation also underclaimed snacks by 421, which resulted in under reimbursement of $455. Finally, the claim also contained overcount errors of 136 meals, resulting in overclaimed reimbursement of $565. The August 2023 claim reported fewer meals served than the eligible meals per the School Corporation's detail meal count reports, which resulted in underclaimed meals in net totaling $11,474. The School Corporation did not claim meals served on August 31, 2023, totaling 3,879 meals. This resulted in underclaimed meal reimbursement totaling $13,767. The School Corporation also claimed 141 second student and staff meals, which resulted in overclaimed reimbursement totaling $480. Finally, the claim also contained overcount errors of 497 meals, resulting in overclaimed reimbursement of $1,813. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.302(b) states in part: "The financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for the following . . . (2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in §§ 200.328 and 200.329. . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 27 GARY COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Cause The School Corporation did not have effective internal control procedures in place over the Claims submitted. The Claims did not contain evidence of an oversight or review process in place to prevent, or detect and correct, errors. The Claims were prepared based upon a summary sheet prepared by the FSMC employee and were not verified back to the source records. Effect Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirement could result in the repayment of federal funds. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures over the preparation and review of claims to ensure appropriate reviews, approval, and oversight are taking place. Additionally, management should develop policies and procedures to ensure that the FSMC provides the School Corporation with complete and accurate information for all claim submissions. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-005 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Reporting Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 2022-2023, 2023-2024 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2022-003. Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not designed or implemented at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. Monthly Sponsor Claims for Reimbursement (Claims) were submitted to the Indiana Department of Education based upon the number of meals served for the month. The Claims were prepared by the Food Service Manager or food service management company (FSMC) employee. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 26 GARY COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) The School Corporation maintained manual meal count records. A point-of-sale system (POS) was used for some schools in some months, but it was not consistent. The reports from the POS identified second student meals and staff meals that were included in the amounts claimed for reimbursement. For all three Claims tested, there were differences between the Claims submitted and the School Corporation's detail meal count reports, resulting in over and under reporting and reimbursement. The Claims tested contained the following errors: The December 2022 claim reported 41 more meals served than the eligible meals per the School Corporation's detail meal count reports, which resulted in overclaimed reimbursement totaling $109. Of this total, $59 (22 meals) was due to improperly claiming second student or staff meals. The March 2023 claim in total reported more meals served than the eligible meals per the School Corporation's detail meal count reports, which resulted in overclaimed meals totaling $4,254. Of this total, $4,144 was due to claiming second student or staff meals, totaling $1,035, for breakfast and lunch. The School Corporation also underclaimed snacks by 421, which resulted in under reimbursement of $455. Finally, the claim also contained overcount errors of 136 meals, resulting in overclaimed reimbursement of $565. The August 2023 claim reported fewer meals served than the eligible meals per the School Corporation's detail meal count reports, which resulted in underclaimed meals in net totaling $11,474. The School Corporation did not claim meals served on August 31, 2023, totaling 3,879 meals. This resulted in underclaimed meal reimbursement totaling $13,767. The School Corporation also claimed 141 second student and staff meals, which resulted in overclaimed reimbursement totaling $480. Finally, the claim also contained overcount errors of 497 meals, resulting in overclaimed reimbursement of $1,813. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.302(b) states in part: "The financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for the following . . . (2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in §§ 200.328 and 200.329. . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 27 GARY COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Cause The School Corporation did not have effective internal control procedures in place over the Claims submitted. The Claims did not contain evidence of an oversight or review process in place to prevent, or detect and correct, errors. The Claims were prepared based upon a summary sheet prepared by the FSMC employee and were not verified back to the source records. Effect Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirement could result in the repayment of federal funds. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures over the preparation and review of claims to ensure appropriate reviews, approval, and oversight are taking place. Additionally, management should develop policies and procedures to ensure that the FSMC provides the School Corporation with complete and accurate information for all claim submissions. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-005 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Reporting Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 2022-2023, 2023-2024 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2022-003. Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not designed or implemented at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. Monthly Sponsor Claims for Reimbursement (Claims) were submitted to the Indiana Department of Education based upon the number of meals served for the month. The Claims were prepared by the Food Service Manager or food service management company (FSMC) employee. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 26 GARY COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) The School Corporation maintained manual meal count records. A point-of-sale system (POS) was used for some schools in some months, but it was not consistent. The reports from the POS identified second student meals and staff meals that were included in the amounts claimed for reimbursement. For all three Claims tested, there were differences between the Claims submitted and the School Corporation's detail meal count reports, resulting in over and under reporting and reimbursement. The Claims tested contained the following errors: The December 2022 claim reported 41 more meals served than the eligible meals per the School Corporation's detail meal count reports, which resulted in overclaimed reimbursement totaling $109. Of this total, $59 (22 meals) was due to improperly claiming second student or staff meals. The March 2023 claim in total reported more meals served than the eligible meals per the School Corporation's detail meal count reports, which resulted in overclaimed meals totaling $4,254. Of this total, $4,144 was due to claiming second student or staff meals, totaling $1,035, for breakfast and lunch. The School Corporation also underclaimed snacks by 421, which resulted in under reimbursement of $455. Finally, the claim also contained overcount errors of 136 meals, resulting in overclaimed reimbursement of $565. The August 2023 claim reported fewer meals served than the eligible meals per the School Corporation's detail meal count reports, which resulted in underclaimed meals in net totaling $11,474. The School Corporation did not claim meals served on August 31, 2023, totaling 3,879 meals. This resulted in underclaimed meal reimbursement totaling $13,767. The School Corporation also claimed 141 second student and staff meals, which resulted in overclaimed reimbursement totaling $480. Finally, the claim also contained overcount errors of 497 meals, resulting in overclaimed reimbursement of $1,813. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.302(b) states in part: "The financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for the following . . . (2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in §§ 200.328 and 200.329. . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 27 GARY COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Cause The School Corporation did not have effective internal control procedures in place over the Claims submitted. The Claims did not contain evidence of an oversight or review process in place to prevent, or detect and correct, errors. The Claims were prepared based upon a summary sheet prepared by the FSMC employee and were not verified back to the source records. Effect Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirement could result in the repayment of federal funds. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures over the preparation and review of claims to ensure appropriate reviews, approval, and oversight are taking place. Additionally, management should develop policies and procedures to ensure that the FSMC provides the School Corporation with complete and accurate information for all claim submissions. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-001 REPORTING SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY Federal Program: Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listing Number: 84.425D Condition The United States Department of Education required the submission of a report covering the period of July 1, 2022 to June 30, 2023 outlining the various uses of Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Funds. The report was issued during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024. The School was unable to provide support for how the amounts submitted in this report were calculated. Totals reported for expenses were not in line with totals expended during the period as reported on the prior year audited financial statements. Criteria 2 CFR part 200, Appendix XI, Compliance Supplement, Section 3-L-1, states “Non-federal entities may be required to submit performance reports at least annually but not more frequently than quarterly, except in unusual circumstances, using a form or format authorized by OMB (2 CFR section 200.329). They also may be required to submit special reports as required by the terms and conditions of the federal award.” Cause The School did not report activity related to the use of Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Funds in line with actual activity. The School did not have controls in place to ensure accurate reporting. Effect Information on the use of funds from the Education Stabilization Fund were not accurately presented. Recommendation We recommend the School develop internal controls to ensure accurate reporting in line with guidelines. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions The School’s Corrective Action Plan is included on page 22.
FINDING 2024-008 Subject: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - Reporting Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.425C, 84.425D, 84.425U, 84.425W Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425C200018, S425D210013, S425U210013, S425W210015 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2022-004. Condition and Context Internal control is generally defined as a process affected by an entity's oversight body, management, and other personnel that provides reasonable assurance that the objectives of an entity will be achieved. With respect to federal awards, nonfederal entities, such as the School Corporation, are required to establish and maintain internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and terms and conditions of the federal awards. Internal control is not one event or circumstance, but a dynamic and iterative process. The internal control process is based on fundamental principles that operate as a whole but are best understood when analyzed individually. The fundamental principles are related to five components of internal control which are as follows: Control Environment, Risk Assessment, Control Activities, Information and Communication, and Monitoring. If a component is not effective, or the components are not operating together in an integrated manner, then an internal control system cannot be effective. Deficiencies as noted below were identified in the risk assessment, monitoring, and control activities components. Risk Assessment The School Corporation has not established a formal risk assessment process. There is no documented risk assessment policy, nor is there evidence of periodic risk identification, analysis, or evaluation. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 33 CANNELTON CITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Monitoring The School Corporation did not conduct ongoing or periodic reviews to ensure that internal controls were operating as intended and to identify areas for improvement. Furthermore, the School Corporation did not have a process to follow up on corrective actions written as a response to audit findings. Control Activities The School Corporation was required to submit annual data reports to the Indiana Department of Education via JotForm, a form/report builder. Data to be submitted included, but was not limited to, current period expenditures, prior period expenditures, and key line items such as "Number of Specific Positions Supported with ESSER Funds," "Allocation of ESSER funds . . . ," "LEA expenditures by ESSER Subgrant fund . . . ," and "Full-Time Equivalency Positions." As part of sound management of the federal award, the School Corporation was responsible for implementing a system of internal controls that would ensure compliance with the applicable requirements. The School Corporation had not properly designed or implemented such a system, which would include appropriate segregation of duties, that would likely be effective in preventing, or detecting and correcting, noncompliance. During the audit period, the School Corporation submitted one ESSER I report, two ESSER II reports, two ESSER III reports, and one ARP HCY II Report, for a total of six reports. There was no evidence of an oversight, review, or approval process to prevent, or detect and correct, errors prior to submission. All six reports were selected for testing. Four of the reports were not supported by the School Corporation's records, and their accuracy and completeness could not be verified. The following errors were identified: The ESSER II, Year 2 and Year 3 reports, which covered the periods of July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022, and July 1, 2022 to June 30, 2023, respectively, Key Line Items were not able to be traced to supporting documentation. For both reports, the supplies line item could not be traced to the School Corporation's records. For ESSER II, Year 3, the School Corporation reported Other Purchased Services, but the School Corporation's supporting documentation did not include any items that would be classified as such. The ESSER III, Year 2 report, which covered the period of July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022, Key Line Items were not able to be traced to supporting documentation. The School Corporation reported the purchase of Chromebooks as Purchased Property Services, which was not the appropriate classification for the expenditure. The ESSER III, Year 3 report, which covered the period of July 1, 2022 to June 30, 2023, Key Line Items were not able to be traced to supporting documentation. The School Corporation reported amounts related to Purchased Property Services and Personnel Services - Salaries that were not supported by the School Corporation's records. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 34 CANNELTON CITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.302(b) states in part: "The financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for the following . . . (2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in §§ 200.328 and 200.329. . . ." 34 CFR 76.722 states: "A State may require a subgrantee to submit reports in a manner and format that assists the State in complying with the requirements under 34 CFR 76.720 and in carrying out other responsibilities under the program. . . ." 34 CFR 76.731 states: "A State and a subgrantee shall keep records to show its compliance with program requirements." Cause Management of the School Corporation had not taken steps to design and implement policies and procedures to assess risks facing the School Corporation or to establish and operate monitoring activities that monitor the internal control system. Additionally, the School Corporation did not act upon its corrective action plan submitted in response to the same finding included in the prior audit and did not take further steps to ensure compliance. Effect As a result of the five components of internal control not being adequately designed and implemented, the internal control system cannot be effective. Thus, general risks or specific risks from fraud and significant changes could negatively impact the School Corporation, identified internal control deficiencies could continue, and unidentified flaws within the internal control system could exist. Additionally, due to a lack of review and segregation of duties, the School Corporation submitted ESSER II and ESSER III reports that were not supported by the School Corporation's records. As a result, material noncompliance occurred and remained undetected. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 35 CANNELTON CITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a proper system of internal controls, which would include policies and procedures related to risk assessment and monitoring. Additionally, we recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a proper system of internal controls and strengthen its policies and procedures to ensure all reports submitted are accurate. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-008 Subject: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - Reporting Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.425C, 84.425D, 84.425U, 84.425W Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425C200018, S425D210013, S425U210013, S425W210015 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2022-004. Condition and Context Internal control is generally defined as a process affected by an entity's oversight body, management, and other personnel that provides reasonable assurance that the objectives of an entity will be achieved. With respect to federal awards, nonfederal entities, such as the School Corporation, are required to establish and maintain internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and terms and conditions of the federal awards. Internal control is not one event or circumstance, but a dynamic and iterative process. The internal control process is based on fundamental principles that operate as a whole but are best understood when analyzed individually. The fundamental principles are related to five components of internal control which are as follows: Control Environment, Risk Assessment, Control Activities, Information and Communication, and Monitoring. If a component is not effective, or the components are not operating together in an integrated manner, then an internal control system cannot be effective. Deficiencies as noted below were identified in the risk assessment, monitoring, and control activities components. Risk Assessment The School Corporation has not established a formal risk assessment process. There is no documented risk assessment policy, nor is there evidence of periodic risk identification, analysis, or evaluation. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 33 CANNELTON CITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Monitoring The School Corporation did not conduct ongoing or periodic reviews to ensure that internal controls were operating as intended and to identify areas for improvement. Furthermore, the School Corporation did not have a process to follow up on corrective actions written as a response to audit findings. Control Activities The School Corporation was required to submit annual data reports to the Indiana Department of Education via JotForm, a form/report builder. Data to be submitted included, but was not limited to, current period expenditures, prior period expenditures, and key line items such as "Number of Specific Positions Supported with ESSER Funds," "Allocation of ESSER funds . . . ," "LEA expenditures by ESSER Subgrant fund . . . ," and "Full-Time Equivalency Positions." As part of sound management of the federal award, the School Corporation was responsible for implementing a system of internal controls that would ensure compliance with the applicable requirements. The School Corporation had not properly designed or implemented such a system, which would include appropriate segregation of duties, that would likely be effective in preventing, or detecting and correcting, noncompliance. During the audit period, the School Corporation submitted one ESSER I report, two ESSER II reports, two ESSER III reports, and one ARP HCY II Report, for a total of six reports. There was no evidence of an oversight, review, or approval process to prevent, or detect and correct, errors prior to submission. All six reports were selected for testing. Four of the reports were not supported by the School Corporation's records, and their accuracy and completeness could not be verified. The following errors were identified: The ESSER II, Year 2 and Year 3 reports, which covered the periods of July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022, and July 1, 2022 to June 30, 2023, respectively, Key Line Items were not able to be traced to supporting documentation. For both reports, the supplies line item could not be traced to the School Corporation's records. For ESSER II, Year 3, the School Corporation reported Other Purchased Services, but the School Corporation's supporting documentation did not include any items that would be classified as such. The ESSER III, Year 2 report, which covered the period of July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022, Key Line Items were not able to be traced to supporting documentation. The School Corporation reported the purchase of Chromebooks as Purchased Property Services, which was not the appropriate classification for the expenditure. The ESSER III, Year 3 report, which covered the period of July 1, 2022 to June 30, 2023, Key Line Items were not able to be traced to supporting documentation. The School Corporation reported amounts related to Purchased Property Services and Personnel Services - Salaries that were not supported by the School Corporation's records. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 34 CANNELTON CITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.302(b) states in part: "The financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for the following . . . (2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in §§ 200.328 and 200.329. . . ." 34 CFR 76.722 states: "A State may require a subgrantee to submit reports in a manner and format that assists the State in complying with the requirements under 34 CFR 76.720 and in carrying out other responsibilities under the program. . . ." 34 CFR 76.731 states: "A State and a subgrantee shall keep records to show its compliance with program requirements." Cause Management of the School Corporation had not taken steps to design and implement policies and procedures to assess risks facing the School Corporation or to establish and operate monitoring activities that monitor the internal control system. Additionally, the School Corporation did not act upon its corrective action plan submitted in response to the same finding included in the prior audit and did not take further steps to ensure compliance. Effect As a result of the five components of internal control not being adequately designed and implemented, the internal control system cannot be effective. Thus, general risks or specific risks from fraud and significant changes could negatively impact the School Corporation, identified internal control deficiencies could continue, and unidentified flaws within the internal control system could exist. Additionally, due to a lack of review and segregation of duties, the School Corporation submitted ESSER II and ESSER III reports that were not supported by the School Corporation's records. As a result, material noncompliance occurred and remained undetected. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 35 CANNELTON CITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a proper system of internal controls, which would include policies and procedures related to risk assessment and monitoring. Additionally, we recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a proper system of internal controls and strengthen its policies and procedures to ensure all reports submitted are accurate. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-008 Subject: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - Reporting Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.425C, 84.425D, 84.425U, 84.425W Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425C200018, S425D210013, S425U210013, S425W210015 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2022-004. Condition and Context Internal control is generally defined as a process affected by an entity's oversight body, management, and other personnel that provides reasonable assurance that the objectives of an entity will be achieved. With respect to federal awards, nonfederal entities, such as the School Corporation, are required to establish and maintain internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and terms and conditions of the federal awards. Internal control is not one event or circumstance, but a dynamic and iterative process. The internal control process is based on fundamental principles that operate as a whole but are best understood when analyzed individually. The fundamental principles are related to five components of internal control which are as follows: Control Environment, Risk Assessment, Control Activities, Information and Communication, and Monitoring. If a component is not effective, or the components are not operating together in an integrated manner, then an internal control system cannot be effective. Deficiencies as noted below were identified in the risk assessment, monitoring, and control activities components. Risk Assessment The School Corporation has not established a formal risk assessment process. There is no documented risk assessment policy, nor is there evidence of periodic risk identification, analysis, or evaluation. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 33 CANNELTON CITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Monitoring The School Corporation did not conduct ongoing or periodic reviews to ensure that internal controls were operating as intended and to identify areas for improvement. Furthermore, the School Corporation did not have a process to follow up on corrective actions written as a response to audit findings. Control Activities The School Corporation was required to submit annual data reports to the Indiana Department of Education via JotForm, a form/report builder. Data to be submitted included, but was not limited to, current period expenditures, prior period expenditures, and key line items such as "Number of Specific Positions Supported with ESSER Funds," "Allocation of ESSER funds . . . ," "LEA expenditures by ESSER Subgrant fund . . . ," and "Full-Time Equivalency Positions." As part of sound management of the federal award, the School Corporation was responsible for implementing a system of internal controls that would ensure compliance with the applicable requirements. The School Corporation had not properly designed or implemented such a system, which would include appropriate segregation of duties, that would likely be effective in preventing, or detecting and correcting, noncompliance. During the audit period, the School Corporation submitted one ESSER I report, two ESSER II reports, two ESSER III reports, and one ARP HCY II Report, for a total of six reports. There was no evidence of an oversight, review, or approval process to prevent, or detect and correct, errors prior to submission. All six reports were selected for testing. Four of the reports were not supported by the School Corporation's records, and their accuracy and completeness could not be verified. The following errors were identified: The ESSER II, Year 2 and Year 3 reports, which covered the periods of July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022, and July 1, 2022 to June 30, 2023, respectively, Key Line Items were not able to be traced to supporting documentation. For both reports, the supplies line item could not be traced to the School Corporation's records. For ESSER II, Year 3, the School Corporation reported Other Purchased Services, but the School Corporation's supporting documentation did not include any items that would be classified as such. The ESSER III, Year 2 report, which covered the period of July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022, Key Line Items were not able to be traced to supporting documentation. The School Corporation reported the purchase of Chromebooks as Purchased Property Services, which was not the appropriate classification for the expenditure. The ESSER III, Year 3 report, which covered the period of July 1, 2022 to June 30, 2023, Key Line Items were not able to be traced to supporting documentation. The School Corporation reported amounts related to Purchased Property Services and Personnel Services - Salaries that were not supported by the School Corporation's records. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 34 CANNELTON CITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.302(b) states in part: "The financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for the following . . . (2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in §§ 200.328 and 200.329. . . ." 34 CFR 76.722 states: "A State may require a subgrantee to submit reports in a manner and format that assists the State in complying with the requirements under 34 CFR 76.720 and in carrying out other responsibilities under the program. . . ." 34 CFR 76.731 states: "A State and a subgrantee shall keep records to show its compliance with program requirements." Cause Management of the School Corporation had not taken steps to design and implement policies and procedures to assess risks facing the School Corporation or to establish and operate monitoring activities that monitor the internal control system. Additionally, the School Corporation did not act upon its corrective action plan submitted in response to the same finding included in the prior audit and did not take further steps to ensure compliance. Effect As a result of the five components of internal control not being adequately designed and implemented, the internal control system cannot be effective. Thus, general risks or specific risks from fraud and significant changes could negatively impact the School Corporation, identified internal control deficiencies could continue, and unidentified flaws within the internal control system could exist. Additionally, due to a lack of review and segregation of duties, the School Corporation submitted ESSER II and ESSER III reports that were not supported by the School Corporation's records. As a result, material noncompliance occurred and remained undetected. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 35 CANNELTON CITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a proper system of internal controls, which would include policies and procedures related to risk assessment and monitoring. Additionally, we recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a proper system of internal controls and strengthen its policies and procedures to ensure all reports submitted are accurate. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-008 Subject: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - Reporting Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.425C, 84.425D, 84.425U, 84.425W Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425C200018, S425D210013, S425U210013, S425W210015 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2022-004. Condition and Context Internal control is generally defined as a process affected by an entity's oversight body, management, and other personnel that provides reasonable assurance that the objectives of an entity will be achieved. With respect to federal awards, nonfederal entities, such as the School Corporation, are required to establish and maintain internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and terms and conditions of the federal awards. Internal control is not one event or circumstance, but a dynamic and iterative process. The internal control process is based on fundamental principles that operate as a whole but are best understood when analyzed individually. The fundamental principles are related to five components of internal control which are as follows: Control Environment, Risk Assessment, Control Activities, Information and Communication, and Monitoring. If a component is not effective, or the components are not operating together in an integrated manner, then an internal control system cannot be effective. Deficiencies as noted below were identified in the risk assessment, monitoring, and control activities components. Risk Assessment The School Corporation has not established a formal risk assessment process. There is no documented risk assessment policy, nor is there evidence of periodic risk identification, analysis, or evaluation. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 33 CANNELTON CITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Monitoring The School Corporation did not conduct ongoing or periodic reviews to ensure that internal controls were operating as intended and to identify areas for improvement. Furthermore, the School Corporation did not have a process to follow up on corrective actions written as a response to audit findings. Control Activities The School Corporation was required to submit annual data reports to the Indiana Department of Education via JotForm, a form/report builder. Data to be submitted included, but was not limited to, current period expenditures, prior period expenditures, and key line items such as "Number of Specific Positions Supported with ESSER Funds," "Allocation of ESSER funds . . . ," "LEA expenditures by ESSER Subgrant fund . . . ," and "Full-Time Equivalency Positions." As part of sound management of the federal award, the School Corporation was responsible for implementing a system of internal controls that would ensure compliance with the applicable requirements. The School Corporation had not properly designed or implemented such a system, which would include appropriate segregation of duties, that would likely be effective in preventing, or detecting and correcting, noncompliance. During the audit period, the School Corporation submitted one ESSER I report, two ESSER II reports, two ESSER III reports, and one ARP HCY II Report, for a total of six reports. There was no evidence of an oversight, review, or approval process to prevent, or detect and correct, errors prior to submission. All six reports were selected for testing. Four of the reports were not supported by the School Corporation's records, and their accuracy and completeness could not be verified. The following errors were identified: The ESSER II, Year 2 and Year 3 reports, which covered the periods of July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022, and July 1, 2022 to June 30, 2023, respectively, Key Line Items were not able to be traced to supporting documentation. For both reports, the supplies line item could not be traced to the School Corporation's records. For ESSER II, Year 3, the School Corporation reported Other Purchased Services, but the School Corporation's supporting documentation did not include any items that would be classified as such. The ESSER III, Year 2 report, which covered the period of July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022, Key Line Items were not able to be traced to supporting documentation. The School Corporation reported the purchase of Chromebooks as Purchased Property Services, which was not the appropriate classification for the expenditure. The ESSER III, Year 3 report, which covered the period of July 1, 2022 to June 30, 2023, Key Line Items were not able to be traced to supporting documentation. The School Corporation reported amounts related to Purchased Property Services and Personnel Services - Salaries that were not supported by the School Corporation's records. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 34 CANNELTON CITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.302(b) states in part: "The financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for the following . . . (2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in §§ 200.328 and 200.329. . . ." 34 CFR 76.722 states: "A State may require a subgrantee to submit reports in a manner and format that assists the State in complying with the requirements under 34 CFR 76.720 and in carrying out other responsibilities under the program. . . ." 34 CFR 76.731 states: "A State and a subgrantee shall keep records to show its compliance with program requirements." Cause Management of the School Corporation had not taken steps to design and implement policies and procedures to assess risks facing the School Corporation or to establish and operate monitoring activities that monitor the internal control system. Additionally, the School Corporation did not act upon its corrective action plan submitted in response to the same finding included in the prior audit and did not take further steps to ensure compliance. Effect As a result of the five components of internal control not being adequately designed and implemented, the internal control system cannot be effective. Thus, general risks or specific risks from fraud and significant changes could negatively impact the School Corporation, identified internal control deficiencies could continue, and unidentified flaws within the internal control system could exist. Additionally, due to a lack of review and segregation of duties, the School Corporation submitted ESSER II and ESSER III reports that were not supported by the School Corporation's records. As a result, material noncompliance occurred and remained undetected. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 35 CANNELTON CITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a proper system of internal controls, which would include policies and procedures related to risk assessment and monitoring. Additionally, we recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a proper system of internal controls and strengthen its policies and procedures to ensure all reports submitted are accurate. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.