FINDING 2023-004 Subject: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - Reporting Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listings Number: 84.425D, 84.425U Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425D210013, S425U210013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context The School Corporation had not properly designed or implemented a system of internal controls, which would include appropriate segregation of duties, that would likely be effective in preventing, or detecting and correcting, noncompliance. The School Corporation was required to submit an annual data report to the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE) via JotForm, a form/report builder. Data to be submitted included, but was not limited to, current period expenditures, prior period expenditures, and expenditures per activity. During the audit period the School Corporation was required to submit two ESSER I reports, two ESSER II reports, and two ESSER III reports, for a total of six reports. However, the School Corporation failed to submit all six required reports. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.302(b) states in part: "The financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for the following . . . (2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in §§ 200.328 and 200.329. . . ." 34 CFR 76.722 states: "A State may require a subgrantee to submit reports in a manner and format that assists the State in complying with the requirements under 34 CFR 76.720 and in carrying out other responsibilities under the program." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, reports were not submitted to the IDOE. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure reports are submitted timely and accurately. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
Finding 2022-014 – Noncompliance with Reporting Requirements Over Federal Grant – Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds PASS-THROUGH GRANTOR: Direct Grant FEDERAL AGENCY: U.S. Department of Treasury ASSISTANCE LISTING: 21.027 FEDERAL PROGRAM NAME: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds FEDERAL AWARD YEAR: 2021 CONTROL CATEGORY: Reporting QUESTIONED COSTS: $0 Condition: The test of 100% of Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds expenditures reflected that an incorrect classification category was used for contractors. The quarterly reports that were filed listed the contractors as subrecipients. Further, expenditures for federal programs were not adequately reported on the CSLFRF Compliance Reports. Federal expenditures were understated by $221,261. The following misstatements were noted: • The actual expenditures to vendors totaled $161,634 and the County reported $180,710, resulting in an overstatement of $19,076. • The actual expenditures to subrecipients totaled $404,257 and the County reported $403,909, resulting in an understatement of $348. • The actual expenditures paid to county employees for premium pay and employee benefits were $1,300,148 and the County reported $1,060,159, resulting in an understatement of $239,989. Reported Total Expenditures of Federal Awards $ 1,644,812 Add: Expenditures to Subrecipients 348 Add: Expenditures for Premium Pay 239,989 Less: Expenditures to Vendors (19,076) Actual Federal Expenditures of Federal Awards 1,866,073 Reporting Understated by $ 221,261 Cause of Condition: Policies and procedures have not been designed and implemented to ensure federal expenditures are made in accordance with federal compliance requirements. Effect of Condition: This condition resulted in noncompliance to grant requirements. Recommendation: OSAI recommends the County gain an understanding of the requirements for this program and implement internal controls to ensure compliance with these requirements. Management Response: Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners: The Board of County Commissioners will take measures to ensure future compliance with all requirements of federal grants. Criteria: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Guidance on Recipient Compliance and Reporting Responsibilities reads as follows: 10. Reporting. All recipients of federal funds must complete financial, performance, and compliance reporting as required and outlined in Part 2 of this guidance. Expenditures may be reported on a cash or accrual basis, as long as the methodology is disclosed and consistently applied. Reporting must be consistent with the definition of expenditures pursuant to 2 CFR 200.1. Your organization should appropriately maintain accounting records for compiling and reporting accurate, compliant financial data, in accordance with appropriate accounting standards and principles. In addition, where appropriate, your organization needs to establish controls to ensure completion and timely submission of all mandatory performance and/or compliance reporting. See Part 2 of this guidance for a full overview of recipient reporting responsibilities. Further, 2 CFR § 200.329 Monitoring and Reporting Program Performance (c)(1) reads as follows: The non-Federal entity must submit performance reports at the interval required by the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity to best inform improvements in program outcomes and productivity. Intervals must be no less frequent than annually nor more frequent than quarterly except in unusual circumstances, for example where more frequent reporting is necessary for the effective monitoring of the Federal award or could significantly affect program outcomes. Reports submitted annually by the non-Federal entity and/or pass-through entity must be due no later than 90 calendar days after the reporting period. Reports submitted quarterly or semiannually must be due no later than 30 calendar days after the reporting period. Alternatively, the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may require annual reports before the anniversary dates of multiple year Federal awards. The final performance report submitted by the non-Federal entity and/or pass-through entity must be due no later than 120 calendar days after the period of performance end date. A subrecipient must submit to the pass-through entity, no later than 90 calendar days after the period of performance end date, all final performance reports as required by the terms and conditions of the Federal award. See also § 200.344. If a justified request is submitted by a non-Federal entity, the Federal agency may extend the due date for any performance report.
Reporting Finding Type: Material Weakness Internal control over compliance and noncompliance Federal Program Title and AL Number: Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases (ELC) (93.323). Criteria: According to 2 CFR Section 200.329 (c)(1), the non-federal entity must submit performance reports at the interval required by the pass-through entity to best inform improvements in program outcomes and productivity. Intervals must be no less frequent than annually, and a subrecipient must submit to a pass-through entity, no later than 90 calendar days after the period of performance end date, all final performance reports as required by the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition and context: The Organization could not provide the final reports for two different grants, nor did they maintain adequate documentation that reports were reviewed and filed. This condition was noted during the testing of four statistically valid samples. Cause: The Organization had ineffective controls in place for reporting and related recordkeeping in accordance with 2 CFR Section 200.329 (c)(1). Effect: Without adequate controls in place to ensure projects submit accurate reports on a timely basis, reporting requirements may not be met or reporting could be inaccurate. Questioned Costs: None. Repeat finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization implement policies and procedures to ensure federally required reports prepared by their projects are reviewed. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management concurs with the finding and recommendation. Please see the attached corrective action plan.
Reporting Finding Type: Material Weakness Internal control over compliance and noncompliance Federal Program Title and AL Number: Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases (ELC) (93.323). Criteria: According to 2 CFR Section 200.329 (c)(1), the non-federal entity must submit performance reports at the interval required by the pass-through entity to best inform improvements in program outcomes and productivity. Intervals must be no less frequent than annually, and a subrecipient must submit to a pass-through entity, no later than 90 calendar days after the period of performance end date, all final performance reports as required by the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition and context: The Organization could not provide the final reports for two different grants, nor did they maintain adequate documentation that reports were reviewed and filed. This condition was noted during the testing of four statistically valid samples. Cause: The Organization had ineffective controls in place for reporting and related recordkeeping in accordance with 2 CFR Section 200.329 (c)(1). Effect: Without adequate controls in place to ensure projects submit accurate reports on a timely basis, reporting requirements may not be met or reporting could be inaccurate. Questioned Costs: None. Repeat finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization implement policies and procedures to ensure federally required reports prepared by their projects are reviewed. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management concurs with the finding and recommendation. Please see the attached corrective action plan.
Reporting Finding Type: Material Weakness Internal control over compliance and noncompliance Federal Program Title and AL Number: Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases (ELC) (93.323). Criteria: According to 2 CFR Section 200.329 (c)(1), the non-federal entity must submit performance reports at the interval required by the pass-through entity to best inform improvements in program outcomes and productivity. Intervals must be no less frequent than annually, and a subrecipient must submit to a pass-through entity, no later than 90 calendar days after the period of performance end date, all final performance reports as required by the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition and context: The Organization could not provide the final reports for two different grants, nor did they maintain adequate documentation that reports were reviewed and filed. This condition was noted during the testing of four statistically valid samples. Cause: The Organization had ineffective controls in place for reporting and related recordkeeping in accordance with 2 CFR Section 200.329 (c)(1). Effect: Without adequate controls in place to ensure projects submit accurate reports on a timely basis, reporting requirements may not be met or reporting could be inaccurate. Questioned Costs: None. Repeat finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization implement policies and procedures to ensure federally required reports prepared by their projects are reviewed. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management concurs with the finding and recommendation. Please see the attached corrective action plan.
Reporting Finding Type: Material Weakness Internal control over compliance and noncompliance Federal Program Title and AL Number: Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases (ELC) (93.323). Criteria: According to 2 CFR Section 200.329 (c)(1), the non-federal entity must submit performance reports at the interval required by the pass-through entity to best inform improvements in program outcomes and productivity. Intervals must be no less frequent than annually, and a subrecipient must submit to a pass-through entity, no later than 90 calendar days after the period of performance end date, all final performance reports as required by the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition and context: The Organization could not provide the final reports for two different grants, nor did they maintain adequate documentation that reports were reviewed and filed. This condition was noted during the testing of four statistically valid samples. Cause: The Organization had ineffective controls in place for reporting and related recordkeeping in accordance with 2 CFR Section 200.329 (c)(1). Effect: Without adequate controls in place to ensure projects submit accurate reports on a timely basis, reporting requirements may not be met or reporting could be inaccurate. Questioned Costs: None. Repeat finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization implement policies and procedures to ensure federally required reports prepared by their projects are reviewed. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management concurs with the finding and recommendation. Please see the attached corrective action plan.
Reporting Finding Type: Material Weakness Internal control over compliance and noncompliance Federal Program Title and AL Number: Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases (ELC) (93.323). Criteria: According to 2 CFR Section 200.329 (c)(1), the non-federal entity must submit performance reports at the interval required by the pass-through entity to best inform improvements in program outcomes and productivity. Intervals must be no less frequent than annually, and a subrecipient must submit to a pass-through entity, no later than 90 calendar days after the period of performance end date, all final performance reports as required by the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition and context: The Organization could not provide the final reports for two different grants, nor did they maintain adequate documentation that reports were reviewed and filed. This condition was noted during the testing of four statistically valid samples. Cause: The Organization had ineffective controls in place for reporting and related recordkeeping in accordance with 2 CFR Section 200.329 (c)(1). Effect: Without adequate controls in place to ensure projects submit accurate reports on a timely basis, reporting requirements may not be met or reporting could be inaccurate. Questioned Costs: None. Repeat finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization implement policies and procedures to ensure federally required reports prepared by their projects are reviewed. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management concurs with the finding and recommendation. Please see the attached corrective action plan.
Criteria: Under 2 CFR section 200.329 non-Federal entities are required to submit performance reports at the interval required by the Federal awarding agency. Reports submitted annually by the non-Federalentity are due no later than 90 calendar days after the reporting period. The reports must be supported to ensure the accuracy and completeness of the reports.Condition/context: The University was unable to provide documentation from the awarding agency indicating when reports were required to be submitted. The University submitted two performance reports covering the period under audit as such both were selected for testing. The two reports were not filed within 90 calendar days after the reporting period. In addition, we were not able to test the underlying datato ensure the data in the reports were complete and accurate.Our sample was not, and was not intended to be, statistically valid.Questioned costs: None.Cause/Effect: The University does not have a centralized process for tracking report due dates nor do they maintain the documentation for the data in the reports. The lack of support for required due dates, and data reported results in a material noncompliance with the reporting compliance requirement.Repeat finding: NoRecommendation: We recommend the University create an internal control to obtain reporting requirements for each award received by the University. We recommend a standard process be implemented for each award to track the due dates to ensure they are completed timely. Lastly, we recommend the data in the reports be supported to ensure the data is complete and accurate.Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Heritage University agrees to ensure that it meets the reporting requirements for each award it receives, and the university will establish internal controls. For each award, Heritage University will place a regular procedure to keep track of the deadlines and make sure everything is finished on time. Finally, to guarantee the data is complete and reliable, Heritage University will add support to the reports' data.
Criteria: Under 2 CFR section 200.329 non-Federal entities are required to submit performance reports at the interval required by the Federal awarding agency. Reports submitted annually by the non-Federalentity are due no later than 90 calendar days after the reporting period. The reports must be supported to ensure the accuracy and completeness of the reports.Condition/context: The University was unable to provide documentation from the awarding agency indicating when reports were required to be submitted. The University submitted two performance reports covering the period under audit as such both were selected for testing. The two reports were not filed within 90 calendar days after the reporting period. In addition, we were not able to test the underlying datato ensure the data in the reports were complete and accurate.Our sample was not, and was not intended to be, statistically valid.Questioned costs: None.Cause/Effect: The University does not have a centralized process for tracking report due dates nor do they maintain the documentation for the data in the reports. The lack of support for required due dates, and data reported results in a material noncompliance with the reporting compliance requirement.Repeat finding: NoRecommendation: We recommend the University create an internal control to obtain reporting requirements for each award received by the University. We recommend a standard process be implemented for each award to track the due dates to ensure they are completed timely. Lastly, we recommend the data in the reports be supported to ensure the data is complete and accurate.Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Heritage University agrees to ensure that it meets the reporting requirements for each award it receives, and the university will establish internal controls. For each award, Heritage University will place a regular procedure to keep track of the deadlines and make sure everything is finished on time. Finally, to guarantee the data is complete and reliable, Heritage University will add support to the reports' data.
Criteria: Under 2 CFR section 200.329 non-Federal entities are required to submit performance reports at the interval required by the Federal awarding agency. Reports submitted annually by the non-Federalentity are due no later than 90 calendar days after the reporting period. The reports must be supported to ensure the accuracy and completeness of the reports.Condition/context: The University was unable to provide documentation from the awarding agency indicating when reports were required to be submitted. The University submitted two performance reports covering the period under audit as such both were selected for testing. The two reports were not filed within 90 calendar days after the reporting period. In addition, we were not able to test the underlying datato ensure the data in the reports were complete and accurate.Our sample was not, and was not intended to be, statistically valid.Questioned costs: None.Cause/Effect: The University does not have a centralized process for tracking report due dates nor do they maintain the documentation for the data in the reports. The lack of support for required due dates, and data reported results in a material noncompliance with the reporting compliance requirement.Repeat finding: NoRecommendation: We recommend the University create an internal control to obtain reporting requirements for each award received by the University. We recommend a standard process be implemented for each award to track the due dates to ensure they are completed timely. Lastly, we recommend the data in the reports be supported to ensure the data is complete and accurate.Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Heritage University agrees to ensure that it meets the reporting requirements for each award it receives, and the university will establish internal controls. For each award, Heritage University will place a regular procedure to keep track of the deadlines and make sure everything is finished on time. Finally, to guarantee the data is complete and reliable, Heritage University will add support to the reports' data.
Criteria: Under the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act 18004(e) and the Coronavirus Response and Relief Supplemental Appropriations Act 314(e) institutions that received funds underHEERF I and HEERF II are required to submit a report to the secretary on how the school used its HEERF funds. While the American Rescue Plan did not explicitly identify procedures by which institutions must report on their uses of HEERF grant funds, the U.S. Department of Education exercises this reporting authority under 2 CFR section 200.328 and 2 CFR section 200.329.Condition/context: A sample of 8 special reports from the population of 8 special reports was selected. For each report, the University was unable to provide support for submission or publication dates. In addition, the University could not provide consistent institutional records for the data included in the reports nor could they provide support that the reports were reviewed prior to posting.Our sample was not, and was not intended to be, statistically valid.Questioned costs: None.Cause/Effect: Due to the turnover in the business office, the University was unable to locate support for the submission or publication dates, consistent institutional records for the data included in the reports or documented review of the reports prior to posting. The lack of support for submission or publication dates, data reported and documented review results in a material noncompliance with the reporting compliancerequirement.Repeat finding: YesRecommendation: We recommend the University update previously posted reports to accurately reflect the actual expenditures during the time period covered by the report. We recommend each report beposted to the University?s website on separate documents by quarter and should not be cumulative. We also recommend the University implement a process to ensure the submission dates and publication dates are maintained to ensure compliance with the reporting due dates and that the data submitted in the reports is properly supported by institutional records. Lastly, we recommend each report be properly reviewed by someone other than the preparer and that the review be documented with a signature anddate.Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Heritage University will update the previously posted reports to accurately reflect the actual expenditures during FY20 & FY21 on the University?s website by quarter. Going further it will be the Grant accountant?s practice that the submission dates and publication dates are maintained and documented with reporting due dates. All documents will be reviewed and approved by the VP of Administration/CFO with dated signatures.
Criteria: Under the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act 18004(e) and the Coronavirus Response and Relief Supplemental Appropriations Act 314(e) institutions that received funds underHEERF I and HEERF II are required to submit a report to the secretary on how the school used its HEERF funds. While the American Rescue Plan did not explicitly identify procedures by which institutions must report on their uses of HEERF grant funds, the U.S. Department of Education exercises this reporting authority under 2 CFR section 200.328 and 2 CFR section 200.329.Condition/context: A sample of 8 special reports from the population of 8 special reports was selected. For each report, the University was unable to provide support for submission or publication dates. In addition, the University could not provide consistent institutional records for the data included in the reports nor could they provide support that the reports were reviewed prior to posting.Our sample was not, and was not intended to be, statistically valid.Questioned costs: None.Cause/Effect: Due to the turnover in the business office, the University was unable to locate support for the submission or publication dates, consistent institutional records for the data included in the reports or documented review of the reports prior to posting. The lack of support for submission or publication dates, data reported and documented review results in a material noncompliance with the reporting compliancerequirement.Repeat finding: YesRecommendation: We recommend the University update previously posted reports to accurately reflect the actual expenditures during the time period covered by the report. We recommend each report beposted to the University?s website on separate documents by quarter and should not be cumulative. We also recommend the University implement a process to ensure the submission dates and publication dates are maintained to ensure compliance with the reporting due dates and that the data submitted in the reports is properly supported by institutional records. Lastly, we recommend each report be properly reviewed by someone other than the preparer and that the review be documented with a signature anddate.Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Heritage University will update the previously posted reports to accurately reflect the actual expenditures during FY20 & FY21 on the University?s website by quarter. Going further it will be the Grant accountant?s practice that the submission dates and publication dates are maintained and documented with reporting due dates. All documents will be reviewed and approved by the VP of Administration/CFO with dated signatures.
FINDING 2022-002Subject: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - ReportingFederal Agency: Department of EducationFederal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization FundAssistance Listings Number: 84.425DFederal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): S425D200013Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of EducationCompliance Requirement: ReportingAudit Findings: Material Weakness, Other MattersCondition and ContextAn effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliancewith requirements related to the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement.INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS17SOUTHWEST DUBOIS COUNTY SCHOOL CORPORATIONSCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS(Continued)One of five annual reports required to be completed during the audit period contained materialerrors. The Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER I), Year 1 annual data reportoverstated total expenditures made between March 13, 2020, and September, 30, 2020, by $130,918. Inaddition, documentation provided for the number of full-time employee positions did not support theamounts reported.The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period.Criteria2 CFR 200.303 states in part:"The non-Federal entity must:(a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that providesreasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award incompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federalaward. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards forInternal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of theUnited States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee ofSponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ."2 CFR 200.334 states in part:"Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal entityrecords pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the dateof submission of the final expenditure report or, for Federal awards that are renewed quarterlyor annually, from the date of the submission of the quarterly or annual financial report,respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity in the case ofa subrecipient. . . ."2 CFR 200.302(b) states in part:"The financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for the following:. . .(2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federalaward or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in ?? 200.328and 200.329. . . .(3) Records that identify adequately the source and application of funds for federallyfunded activities. These records must contain information pertaining to Federalawards, authorizations, obligations, unobligated balances, assets, expenditures,income and interest and be supported by source documentation. . . ."34 CFR 76.722 states: "A State may require a subgrantee to submit reports in a manner and formatthat assists the State in complying with the requirements under 34 CFR 76.720 and in carrying out otherresponsibilities under the program."CauseManagement had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliancewith the Reporting compliance requirement.INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS18SOUTHWEST DUBOIS COUNTY SCHOOL CORPORATIONSCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS(Continued)EffectThe failure to establish an effective internal control system enabled material noncompliance to goundetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement couldresult in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation.Questioned CostsThere were no questioned costs identified.RecommendationWe recommended that the School Corporation's management establish internal controls to ensurecompliance and comply with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement.Views of Responsible OfficialsFor the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-002Subject: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - ReportingFederal Agency: Department of EducationFederal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization FundAssistance Listings Number: 84.425DFederal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): S425D200013Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of EducationCompliance Requirement: ReportingAudit Findings: Material Weakness, Other MattersCondition and ContextAn effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliancewith requirements related to the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement.INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS17SOUTHWEST DUBOIS COUNTY SCHOOL CORPORATIONSCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS(Continued)One of five annual reports required to be completed during the audit period contained materialerrors. The Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER I), Year 1 annual data reportoverstated total expenditures made between March 13, 2020, and September, 30, 2020, by $130,918. Inaddition, documentation provided for the number of full-time employee positions did not support theamounts reported.The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period.Criteria2 CFR 200.303 states in part:"The non-Federal entity must:(a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that providesreasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award incompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federalaward. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards forInternal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of theUnited States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee ofSponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ."2 CFR 200.334 states in part:"Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal entityrecords pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the dateof submission of the final expenditure report or, for Federal awards that are renewed quarterlyor annually, from the date of the submission of the quarterly or annual financial report,respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity in the case ofa subrecipient. . . ."2 CFR 200.302(b) states in part:"The financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for the following:. . .(2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federalaward or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in ?? 200.328and 200.329. . . .(3) Records that identify adequately the source and application of funds for federallyfunded activities. These records must contain information pertaining to Federalawards, authorizations, obligations, unobligated balances, assets, expenditures,income and interest and be supported by source documentation. . . ."34 CFR 76.722 states: "A State may require a subgrantee to submit reports in a manner and formatthat assists the State in complying with the requirements under 34 CFR 76.720 and in carrying out otherresponsibilities under the program."CauseManagement had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliancewith the Reporting compliance requirement.INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS18SOUTHWEST DUBOIS COUNTY SCHOOL CORPORATIONSCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS(Continued)EffectThe failure to establish an effective internal control system enabled material noncompliance to goundetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement couldresult in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation.Questioned CostsThere were no questioned costs identified.RecommendationWe recommended that the School Corporation's management establish internal controls to ensurecompliance and comply with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement.Views of Responsible OfficialsFor the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-010Subject: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - ReportingFederal Agency: Department of EducationFederal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization FundAssistance Listings Numbers: 84.425D, 84.425UFederal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425D200013, S425D210013,S425U210013Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of EducationCompliance Requirement: ReportingAudit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified OpinionINDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS33BLACKFORD COUNTY SCHOOLSSCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS(Continued)Condition and ContextAn effective internal control system was not designed or implemented at the School Corporation toensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Reporting compliancerequirement.The School Corporation completed and submitted four annual Data Collection reports (Reports) forthe Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER) grants. For three of the four Reportstested, the Reports were not supported by the unit's records. The financial information provided did notagree to the data submitted in the Reports; therefore, we could not determine the accuracy of the Reports.Additionally, seven of seven key line items selected for testing could not be traced to supporting documentation.The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period.Criteria2 CFR 200.303 states in part:"The non-Federal entity must:(a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that providesreasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award incompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federalaward. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards forInternal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of theUnited States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee ofSponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ."2 CFR 200.302(b) states in part:"The financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for the following:. . .(2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federalaward or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in?? 200.328 and 200.329. . . ."34 CFR 76.722 states: "A State may require a subgrantee to submit reports in a manner and formatthat assists the State in complying with the requirements under 34 CFR 76.720 and in carrying out otherresponsibilities under the program."2 CFR 200.334 states in part:"Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal entityrecords pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the dateof submission of the final expenditure report or, for Federal awards that are renewed quarterlyor annually, from the date of the submission of the quarterly or annual financial report,respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity in the case ofa subrecipient. . . ."INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS34BLACKFORD COUNTY SCHOOLSSCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS(Continued)34 CFR 76.731 states: "A State and a subgrantee shall keep records to show its compliance withprogram requirements."CauseManagement had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliancewith the Reporting compliance requirement.EffectThe failure to design and implement an effective internal control system enabled noncompliance togo undetected with the Reporting compliance requirement.Questioned CostsThere were no questioned costs identified.RecommendationWe recommended that the School Corporation's management establish effective internal controlsto ensure compliance and comply with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement.Views of Responsible OfficialsFor the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS35
FINDING 2022-010Subject: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - ReportingFederal Agency: Department of EducationFederal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization FundAssistance Listings Numbers: 84.425D, 84.425UFederal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425D200013, S425D210013,S425U210013Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of EducationCompliance Requirement: ReportingAudit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified OpinionINDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS33BLACKFORD COUNTY SCHOOLSSCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS(Continued)Condition and ContextAn effective internal control system was not designed or implemented at the School Corporation toensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Reporting compliancerequirement.The School Corporation completed and submitted four annual Data Collection reports (Reports) forthe Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER) grants. For three of the four Reportstested, the Reports were not supported by the unit's records. The financial information provided did notagree to the data submitted in the Reports; therefore, we could not determine the accuracy of the Reports.Additionally, seven of seven key line items selected for testing could not be traced to supporting documentation.The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period.Criteria2 CFR 200.303 states in part:"The non-Federal entity must:(a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that providesreasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award incompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federalaward. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards forInternal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of theUnited States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee ofSponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ."2 CFR 200.302(b) states in part:"The financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for the following:. . .(2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federalaward or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in?? 200.328 and 200.329. . . ."34 CFR 76.722 states: "A State may require a subgrantee to submit reports in a manner and formatthat assists the State in complying with the requirements under 34 CFR 76.720 and in carrying out otherresponsibilities under the program."2 CFR 200.334 states in part:"Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal entityrecords pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the dateof submission of the final expenditure report or, for Federal awards that are renewed quarterlyor annually, from the date of the submission of the quarterly or annual financial report,respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity in the case ofa subrecipient. . . ."INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS34BLACKFORD COUNTY SCHOOLSSCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS(Continued)34 CFR 76.731 states: "A State and a subgrantee shall keep records to show its compliance withprogram requirements."CauseManagement had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliancewith the Reporting compliance requirement.EffectThe failure to design and implement an effective internal control system enabled noncompliance togo undetected with the Reporting compliance requirement.Questioned CostsThere were no questioned costs identified.RecommendationWe recommended that the School Corporation's management establish effective internal controlsto ensure compliance and comply with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement.Views of Responsible OfficialsFor the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS35
FINDING 2022-010Subject: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - ReportingFederal Agency: Department of EducationFederal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization FundAssistance Listings Numbers: 84.425D, 84.425UFederal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425D200013, S425D210013,S425U210013Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of EducationCompliance Requirement: ReportingAudit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified OpinionINDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS33BLACKFORD COUNTY SCHOOLSSCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS(Continued)Condition and ContextAn effective internal control system was not designed or implemented at the School Corporation toensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Reporting compliancerequirement.The School Corporation completed and submitted four annual Data Collection reports (Reports) forthe Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER) grants. For three of the four Reportstested, the Reports were not supported by the unit's records. The financial information provided did notagree to the data submitted in the Reports; therefore, we could not determine the accuracy of the Reports.Additionally, seven of seven key line items selected for testing could not be traced to supporting documentation.The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period.Criteria2 CFR 200.303 states in part:"The non-Federal entity must:(a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that providesreasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award incompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federalaward. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards forInternal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of theUnited States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee ofSponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ."2 CFR 200.302(b) states in part:"The financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for the following:. . .(2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federalaward or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in?? 200.328 and 200.329. . . ."34 CFR 76.722 states: "A State may require a subgrantee to submit reports in a manner and formatthat assists the State in complying with the requirements under 34 CFR 76.720 and in carrying out otherresponsibilities under the program."2 CFR 200.334 states in part:"Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal entityrecords pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the dateof submission of the final expenditure report or, for Federal awards that are renewed quarterlyor annually, from the date of the submission of the quarterly or annual financial report,respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity in the case ofa subrecipient. . . ."INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS34BLACKFORD COUNTY SCHOOLSSCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS(Continued)34 CFR 76.731 states: "A State and a subgrantee shall keep records to show its compliance withprogram requirements."CauseManagement had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliancewith the Reporting compliance requirement.EffectThe failure to design and implement an effective internal control system enabled noncompliance togo undetected with the Reporting compliance requirement.Questioned CostsThere were no questioned costs identified.RecommendationWe recommended that the School Corporation's management establish effective internal controlsto ensure compliance and comply with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement.Views of Responsible OfficialsFor the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS35
FINDING 2022-010Subject: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - ReportingFederal Agency: Department of EducationFederal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization FundAssistance Listings Numbers: 84.425D, 84.425UFederal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425D200013, S425D210013,S425U210013Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of EducationCompliance Requirement: ReportingAudit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified OpinionINDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS33BLACKFORD COUNTY SCHOOLSSCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS(Continued)Condition and ContextAn effective internal control system was not designed or implemented at the School Corporation toensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Reporting compliancerequirement.The School Corporation completed and submitted four annual Data Collection reports (Reports) forthe Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER) grants. For three of the four Reportstested, the Reports were not supported by the unit's records. The financial information provided did notagree to the data submitted in the Reports; therefore, we could not determine the accuracy of the Reports.Additionally, seven of seven key line items selected for testing could not be traced to supporting documentation.The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period.Criteria2 CFR 200.303 states in part:"The non-Federal entity must:(a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that providesreasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award incompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federalaward. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards forInternal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of theUnited States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee ofSponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ."2 CFR 200.302(b) states in part:"The financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for the following:. . .(2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federalaward or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in?? 200.328 and 200.329. . . ."34 CFR 76.722 states: "A State may require a subgrantee to submit reports in a manner and formatthat assists the State in complying with the requirements under 34 CFR 76.720 and in carrying out otherresponsibilities under the program."2 CFR 200.334 states in part:"Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal entityrecords pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the dateof submission of the final expenditure report or, for Federal awards that are renewed quarterlyor annually, from the date of the submission of the quarterly or annual financial report,respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity in the case ofa subrecipient. . . ."INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS34BLACKFORD COUNTY SCHOOLSSCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS(Continued)34 CFR 76.731 states: "A State and a subgrantee shall keep records to show its compliance withprogram requirements."CauseManagement had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliancewith the Reporting compliance requirement.EffectThe failure to design and implement an effective internal control system enabled noncompliance togo undetected with the Reporting compliance requirement.Questioned CostsThere were no questioned costs identified.RecommendationWe recommended that the School Corporation's management establish effective internal controlsto ensure compliance and comply with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement.Views of Responsible OfficialsFor the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS35
FINDING 2022-005Subject: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - ReportingFederal Agency: Department of EducationFederal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization FundAssistance Listings Number: 84.425DFederal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): S425D200013Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of EducationCompliance Requirement: ReportingAudit Findings: Material Weakness, Other MattersINDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS22MONROE COUNTY COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATIONSCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS(Continued)Condition and ContextAn effective internal control system was not designed nor implemented at the School Corporationto ensure compliance with the requirements related to the grant agreement and the Reporting compliancerequirement.The School Corporation filed the four required Elementary and Secondary School EmergencyRelief (ESSER) annual data reports. However, the ESSER I, Year 1 and ESSER I, Year 2 reports werenot supported by the School Corporation's records. For each of the reports, two key line items wereselected for verification, none of the line items tested were supported by the School Corporation's records.For the ESSER I, Year 2 report the data included expenditures for two months beyond the reporting period.The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were applicable to the ESSER I grant during theaudit period.Criteria2 CFR 200.303 states in part:"The non-Federal entity must:(a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that providesreasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award incompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federalaward. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards forInternal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of theUnited States or the 'Internal Control Integrated framework', issued by the Committee ofSponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ."2 CFR 200.334 states in part:"Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal entityrecords pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the dateof submission of the final expenditure report or, for Federal awards that are renewed quarterlyor annually, from the date of the submission of the quarterly or annual financial report,respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity in the case ofa subrecipient. . . ."2 CFR 200.302(b) states in part:"The financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for the following:. . .(2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federalaward or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in ?? 200.328and 200.329. . . .(3) Records that identify adequately the source and application of funds for federallyfunded activities. These records must contain information pertaining to Federalawards, authorizations, obligations, unobligated balances, assets, expenditures,income and interest and be supported by source documentation. . . ."INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS23MONROE COUNTY COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATIONSCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS(Continued)34 CFR 76.722 states: "A State may require a subgrantee to submit reports in a manner and formatthat assists the State in complying with the requirements under 34 CFR 76.720 and in carrying out otherresponsibilities under the program."CauseManagement had not designed, nor implemented a system of internal controls that would haveensured compliance or that supporting documentation would have been maintained and available for auditrelated to the Reporting compliance requirement.EffectThe failure to retain and provide appropriate supporting documentation prevented the determination of the School Corporation's compliance with the Reporting compliance requirement. Noncompliancewith the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federalfunds to the School Corporation.Questioned CostsThere were no questioned costs identified.RecommendationWe recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure that documentation will be maintained and available for audit and comply with the grantagreement and the Reporting compliance requirement.Views of Responsible OfficialsFor the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-005Subject: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - ReportingFederal Agency: Department of EducationFederal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization FundAssistance Listings Number: 84.425DFederal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): S425D200013Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of EducationCompliance Requirement: ReportingAudit Findings: Material Weakness, Other MattersINDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS22MONROE COUNTY COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATIONSCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS(Continued)Condition and ContextAn effective internal control system was not designed nor implemented at the School Corporationto ensure compliance with the requirements related to the grant agreement and the Reporting compliancerequirement.The School Corporation filed the four required Elementary and Secondary School EmergencyRelief (ESSER) annual data reports. However, the ESSER I, Year 1 and ESSER I, Year 2 reports werenot supported by the School Corporation's records. For each of the reports, two key line items wereselected for verification, none of the line items tested were supported by the School Corporation's records.For the ESSER I, Year 2 report the data included expenditures for two months beyond the reporting period.The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were applicable to the ESSER I grant during theaudit period.Criteria2 CFR 200.303 states in part:"The non-Federal entity must:(a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that providesreasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award incompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federalaward. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards forInternal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of theUnited States or the 'Internal Control Integrated framework', issued by the Committee ofSponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ."2 CFR 200.334 states in part:"Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal entityrecords pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the dateof submission of the final expenditure report or, for Federal awards that are renewed quarterlyor annually, from the date of the submission of the quarterly or annual financial report,respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity in the case ofa subrecipient. . . ."2 CFR 200.302(b) states in part:"The financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for the following:. . .(2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federalaward or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in ?? 200.328and 200.329. . . .(3) Records that identify adequately the source and application of funds for federallyfunded activities. These records must contain information pertaining to Federalawards, authorizations, obligations, unobligated balances, assets, expenditures,income and interest and be supported by source documentation. . . ."INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS23MONROE COUNTY COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATIONSCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS(Continued)34 CFR 76.722 states: "A State may require a subgrantee to submit reports in a manner and formatthat assists the State in complying with the requirements under 34 CFR 76.720 and in carrying out otherresponsibilities under the program."CauseManagement had not designed, nor implemented a system of internal controls that would haveensured compliance or that supporting documentation would have been maintained and available for auditrelated to the Reporting compliance requirement.EffectThe failure to retain and provide appropriate supporting documentation prevented the determination of the School Corporation's compliance with the Reporting compliance requirement. Noncompliancewith the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federalfunds to the School Corporation.Questioned CostsThere were no questioned costs identified.RecommendationWe recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure that documentation will be maintained and available for audit and comply with the grantagreement and the Reporting compliance requirement.Views of Responsible OfficialsFor the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-005Subject: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - ReportingFederal Agency: Department of EducationFederal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization FundAssistance Listings Numbers: 84.425D, 84.425UFederal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425D20013, S425D210013,S425U210013Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of EducationCompliance Requirement: ReportingAudit Findings: Material Weakness, Other MattersCondition and ContextAn effective internal control system was not designed, nor implemented, at the School Corporationto ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Reporting compliancerequirement.The School Corporation completed and submitted four annual Data Collection reports (Reports) forthe Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER) grants. The Reports were prepared byone employee without an oversite or review process in place to prevent, or detect and correct, errors.Additionally, one of the four Reports tested was not supported by the School Corporation's records.The financial information provided did not agree to all the data submitted in the Report; therefore, we couldnot determine the accuracy of the Report. Additionally, two of six key line items selected for testing couldnot be traced to supporting documentation.The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period.Criteria2 CFR 200.303 states in part:"The non-Federal entity must:(a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that providesreasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award incompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federalaward. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards forInternal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of theUnited States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee ofSponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ."2 CFR 200.302(b) states in part:"The financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for the following:. . .(2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federalaward or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in ?? 200.328and 200.329. . . ."34 CFR 76.722 states: "A State may require a subgrantee to submit reports in a manner and formatthat assists the State in complying with the requirements under 34 CFR 76.720 and in carrying out otherresponsibilities under the program."2 CFR 200.334 states in part:"Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal entityrecords pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the dateof submission of the final expenditure report or, for Federal awards that are renewed quarterlyor annually, from the date of the submission of the quarterly or annual financial report, respectively,as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity in the case of a subrecipient.. . ."34 CFR 76.731 states: "A State and a subgrantee shall keep records to show its compliance withprogram requirements."CauseManagement had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliancewith the Reporting compliance requirement.EffectThe failure to establish an effective internal control system enabled noncompliance to go undetected.Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement could resultin the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation.Questioned CostsThere were no questioned costs identified.RecommendationWe recommended that the School Corporation's management establish effective internal controlsto ensure compliance and comply with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement.Views of Responsible OfficialsFor the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-005Subject: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - ReportingFederal Agency: Department of EducationFederal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization FundAssistance Listings Numbers: 84.425D, 84.425UFederal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425D20013, S425D210013,S425U210013Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of EducationCompliance Requirement: ReportingAudit Findings: Material Weakness, Other MattersCondition and ContextAn effective internal control system was not designed, nor implemented, at the School Corporationto ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Reporting compliancerequirement.The School Corporation completed and submitted four annual Data Collection reports (Reports) forthe Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER) grants. The Reports were prepared byone employee without an oversite or review process in place to prevent, or detect and correct, errors.Additionally, one of the four Reports tested was not supported by the School Corporation's records.The financial information provided did not agree to all the data submitted in the Report; therefore, we couldnot determine the accuracy of the Report. Additionally, two of six key line items selected for testing couldnot be traced to supporting documentation.The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period.Criteria2 CFR 200.303 states in part:"The non-Federal entity must:(a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that providesreasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award incompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federalaward. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards forInternal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of theUnited States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee ofSponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ."2 CFR 200.302(b) states in part:"The financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for the following:. . .(2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federalaward or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in ?? 200.328and 200.329. . . ."34 CFR 76.722 states: "A State may require a subgrantee to submit reports in a manner and formatthat assists the State in complying with the requirements under 34 CFR 76.720 and in carrying out otherresponsibilities under the program."2 CFR 200.334 states in part:"Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal entityrecords pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the dateof submission of the final expenditure report or, for Federal awards that are renewed quarterlyor annually, from the date of the submission of the quarterly or annual financial report, respectively,as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity in the case of a subrecipient.. . ."34 CFR 76.731 states: "A State and a subgrantee shall keep records to show its compliance withprogram requirements."CauseManagement had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliancewith the Reporting compliance requirement.EffectThe failure to establish an effective internal control system enabled noncompliance to go undetected.Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement could resultin the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation.Questioned CostsThere were no questioned costs identified.RecommendationWe recommended that the School Corporation's management establish effective internal controlsto ensure compliance and comply with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement.Views of Responsible OfficialsFor the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-005Subject: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - ReportingFederal Agency: Department of EducationFederal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization FundAssistance Listings Numbers: 84.425D, 84.425UFederal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425D20013, S425D210013,S425U210013Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of EducationCompliance Requirement: ReportingAudit Findings: Material Weakness, Other MattersCondition and ContextAn effective internal control system was not designed, nor implemented, at the School Corporationto ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Reporting compliancerequirement.The School Corporation completed and submitted four annual Data Collection reports (Reports) forthe Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER) grants. The Reports were prepared byone employee without an oversite or review process in place to prevent, or detect and correct, errors.Additionally, one of the four Reports tested was not supported by the School Corporation's records.The financial information provided did not agree to all the data submitted in the Report; therefore, we couldnot determine the accuracy of the Report. Additionally, two of six key line items selected for testing couldnot be traced to supporting documentation.The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period.Criteria2 CFR 200.303 states in part:"The non-Federal entity must:(a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that providesreasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award incompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federalaward. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards forInternal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of theUnited States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee ofSponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ."2 CFR 200.302(b) states in part:"The financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for the following:. . .(2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federalaward or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in ?? 200.328and 200.329. . . ."34 CFR 76.722 states: "A State may require a subgrantee to submit reports in a manner and formatthat assists the State in complying with the requirements under 34 CFR 76.720 and in carrying out otherresponsibilities under the program."2 CFR 200.334 states in part:"Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal entityrecords pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the dateof submission of the final expenditure report or, for Federal awards that are renewed quarterlyor annually, from the date of the submission of the quarterly or annual financial report, respectively,as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity in the case of a subrecipient.. . ."34 CFR 76.731 states: "A State and a subgrantee shall keep records to show its compliance withprogram requirements."CauseManagement had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliancewith the Reporting compliance requirement.EffectThe failure to establish an effective internal control system enabled noncompliance to go undetected.Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement could resultin the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation.Questioned CostsThere were no questioned costs identified.RecommendationWe recommended that the School Corporation's management establish effective internal controlsto ensure compliance and comply with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement.Views of Responsible OfficialsFor the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-005Subject: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - ReportingFederal Agency: Department of EducationFederal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization FundAssistance Listings Numbers: 84.425D, 84.425UFederal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425D20013, S425D210013,S425U210013Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of EducationCompliance Requirement: ReportingAudit Findings: Material Weakness, Other MattersCondition and ContextAn effective internal control system was not designed, nor implemented, at the School Corporationto ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Reporting compliancerequirement.The School Corporation completed and submitted four annual Data Collection reports (Reports) forthe Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER) grants. The Reports were prepared byone employee without an oversite or review process in place to prevent, or detect and correct, errors.Additionally, one of the four Reports tested was not supported by the School Corporation's records.The financial information provided did not agree to all the data submitted in the Report; therefore, we couldnot determine the accuracy of the Report. Additionally, two of six key line items selected for testing couldnot be traced to supporting documentation.The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period.Criteria2 CFR 200.303 states in part:"The non-Federal entity must:(a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that providesreasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award incompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federalaward. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards forInternal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of theUnited States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee ofSponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ."2 CFR 200.302(b) states in part:"The financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for the following:. . .(2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federalaward or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in ?? 200.328and 200.329. . . ."34 CFR 76.722 states: "A State may require a subgrantee to submit reports in a manner and formatthat assists the State in complying with the requirements under 34 CFR 76.720 and in carrying out otherresponsibilities under the program."2 CFR 200.334 states in part:"Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal entityrecords pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the dateof submission of the final expenditure report or, for Federal awards that are renewed quarterlyor annually, from the date of the submission of the quarterly or annual financial report, respectively,as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity in the case of a subrecipient.. . ."34 CFR 76.731 states: "A State and a subgrantee shall keep records to show its compliance withprogram requirements."CauseManagement had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliancewith the Reporting compliance requirement.EffectThe failure to establish an effective internal control system enabled noncompliance to go undetected.Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement could resultin the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation.Questioned CostsThere were no questioned costs identified.RecommendationWe recommended that the School Corporation's management establish effective internal controlsto ensure compliance and comply with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement.Views of Responsible OfficialsFor the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
The District failed to accurately report program costs. 1. Program Information: Water Storage Tank Project, CFDA Number 10.760. 2. Condition: During a review of progress reports submitted to USDA and actual costs incurred as recorded in the accounting records, it was noted that the total of interest costs reported USDA did not match to the total of interest costs recorded in the accounting records. 3. Criteria: 2 CFR Section 200.329 requires that entities receiving federal funds “relate financial data and accomplishments to performance goals and objectives of the Federal award. Also, in accordance with above mentioned common information collections, and when required by the terms and conditions of the Federal award, recipients must provide cost information to demonstrate cost effective practices (e.g., through unit cost data).” 4. Cause of Condition: A separation between accounting and reporting allowed reports to be submitted for costs that were not actually incurred. 5. Effect of Condition: The District reported $60,038 more interest than what was actually incurred during the year ended June 30, 2022. 6. Recommendation: All reports submitted in relation to federal programs should be reconciled to the accounting records before submission to the applicable federal entity. 7. Client response: While discussing this issue with the USDA over email it was agreed that other expenses that were previously paid by the district and not covered by the USDA loan would be acceptable to use instead of the miscalculated, overage of the interest expense. The district had spent several hundred thousand dollars in funds above the originally budgeted district contribution towards the Water Storage Tank Project previous to acquiring the loan with the USDA.
Reporting Federal Program Name Student Financial Assistance Cluster Federal Pell Grant Program (PELL), CFDA No. 84.063 Federal Direct Student Loan Program (DL) CFDA No. 84.268 Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund (HEERF) HEERF Institutional Portion, ALN. 84.425F HEERF Minority Serving Institutions (MSIs), ALN. 84.425L Name of Federal Agency U.S. Department of Education Pass-through Entity N/A Criteria Financial Reporting Student Financial Assistance Cluster According to 2 CFR section 200.328, the Federal agency must require only OMB-approved governmentwide data elements on recipient financial reports. OMB requires to use form SF-270 for Request for Advance or Reimbursement (Form 270, Request for Title IV Reimbursement or Heightened Cash Monitoring 2 [0MB No. 1845-0089]) - Applicable to ED programs (using the GS System). Special Reporting Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund (HEERF) According 2 CFR section 200.329 outlines the monitoring and reporting program performance requirements for Federal awards. It emphasizes the responsibility of the recipient and subrecipient for oversight and compliance with applicable Federal requirements. The CARES Act 18004(e) and the CRRSAA 314(e) requires an institution receiving funds under HEERF I and HEERF II to submit a report to the secretary, at such a manner as the secretary may require.-19- ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY INC. (Non-Profit Organization) Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs For the Year Ended June 30, 2022 SECTION III – FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS RELATING TO FEDERAL AWARDS, (Continued) Finding No. 2022–004 - Reporting, (Continued) Condition Financial Reporting Student Financial Assistance Cluster As part of our testing, we selected 6 fund request transactions proportionally among the grants as of June 30, 2022. We noted that in all transactions the Institution this not use Form 270, neither a similar document that was properly signed by an authorized official. Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund (HEERF) As part of our testing, we observed that in the quarterly report information was inaccurate, since the Student Portion expense information was not reported. Also, the report of March 2022 quarter was submitted late. Cause Student Financial Assistance Cluster The form was not prepared because the person in charge did not know that it was required. Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund (HEERF) The person in charge was unaware that Student portion information had to be included in the quarterly reports. Effect As a result of this condition, the USDE was prevented from the use of accurate reporting data, which is critical for the effective administration of HEERF program for USDE budgetary policy analysis. Questioned Cost None Context Student Financial Assistance Cluster Of the 62 funds requisitions for 2022, we selected 6 instances in which the Institution did not comply with the financial reporting requirements Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund (HEERF) Of four (4) quarterly reports for 2022, we selected all reports for examinations in which the Institution did not comply with the special reporting requirements. Identification of a Repeat Finding This is not a repeat finding from the immediate previous audit. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions The Institution management agrees with this finding. Please refer to the corrective action plan on pages 22-26. Recommendation Management should reassess the reporting procedures of the federal programs in which the Institution submits the information to the USDE to ensure they comply with the reporting timeframe. The Institution should enhance both electronic and manual procedures to ensure that the required reports are timely and accurately reported to USDE.
Reporting Federal Program Name Student Financial Assistance Cluster Federal Pell Grant Program (PELL), CFDA No. 84.063 Federal Direct Student Loan Program (DL) CFDA No. 84.268 Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund (HEERF) HEERF Institutional Portion, ALN. 84.425F HEERF Minority Serving Institutions (MSIs), ALN. 84.425L Name of Federal Agency U.S. Department of Education Pass-through Entity N/A Criteria Financial Reporting Student Financial Assistance Cluster According to 2 CFR section 200.328, the Federal agency must require only OMB-approved governmentwide data elements on recipient financial reports. OMB requires to use form SF-270 for Request for Advance or Reimbursement (Form 270, Request for Title IV Reimbursement or Heightened Cash Monitoring 2 [0MB No. 1845-0089]) - Applicable to ED programs (using the GS System). Special Reporting Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund (HEERF) According 2 CFR section 200.329 outlines the monitoring and reporting program performance requirements for Federal awards. It emphasizes the responsibility of the recipient and subrecipient for oversight and compliance with applicable Federal requirements. The CARES Act 18004(e) and the CRRSAA 314(e) requires an institution receiving funds under HEERF I and HEERF II to submit a report to the secretary, at such a manner as the secretary may require.-19- ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY INC. (Non-Profit Organization) Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs For the Year Ended June 30, 2022 SECTION III – FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS RELATING TO FEDERAL AWARDS, (Continued) Finding No. 2022–004 - Reporting, (Continued) Condition Financial Reporting Student Financial Assistance Cluster As part of our testing, we selected 6 fund request transactions proportionally among the grants as of June 30, 2022. We noted that in all transactions the Institution this not use Form 270, neither a similar document that was properly signed by an authorized official. Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund (HEERF) As part of our testing, we observed that in the quarterly report information was inaccurate, since the Student Portion expense information was not reported. Also, the report of March 2022 quarter was submitted late. Cause Student Financial Assistance Cluster The form was not prepared because the person in charge did not know that it was required. Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund (HEERF) The person in charge was unaware that Student portion information had to be included in the quarterly reports. Effect As a result of this condition, the USDE was prevented from the use of accurate reporting data, which is critical for the effective administration of HEERF program for USDE budgetary policy analysis. Questioned Cost None Context Student Financial Assistance Cluster Of the 62 funds requisitions for 2022, we selected 6 instances in which the Institution did not comply with the financial reporting requirements Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund (HEERF) Of four (4) quarterly reports for 2022, we selected all reports for examinations in which the Institution did not comply with the special reporting requirements. Identification of a Repeat Finding This is not a repeat finding from the immediate previous audit. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions The Institution management agrees with this finding. Please refer to the corrective action plan on pages 22-26. Recommendation Management should reassess the reporting procedures of the federal programs in which the Institution submits the information to the USDE to ensure they comply with the reporting timeframe. The Institution should enhance both electronic and manual procedures to ensure that the required reports are timely and accurately reported to USDE.
Reporting Federal Program Name Student Financial Assistance Cluster Federal Pell Grant Program (PELL), CFDA No. 84.063 Federal Direct Student Loan Program (DL) CFDA No. 84.268 Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund (HEERF) HEERF Institutional Portion, ALN. 84.425F HEERF Minority Serving Institutions (MSIs), ALN. 84.425L Name of Federal Agency U.S. Department of Education Pass-through Entity N/A Criteria Financial Reporting Student Financial Assistance Cluster According to 2 CFR section 200.328, the Federal agency must require only OMB-approved governmentwide data elements on recipient financial reports. OMB requires to use form SF-270 for Request for Advance or Reimbursement (Form 270, Request for Title IV Reimbursement or Heightened Cash Monitoring 2 [0MB No. 1845-0089]) - Applicable to ED programs (using the GS System). Special Reporting Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund (HEERF) According 2 CFR section 200.329 outlines the monitoring and reporting program performance requirements for Federal awards. It emphasizes the responsibility of the recipient and subrecipient for oversight and compliance with applicable Federal requirements. The CARES Act 18004(e) and the CRRSAA 314(e) requires an institution receiving funds under HEERF I and HEERF II to submit a report to the secretary, at such a manner as the secretary may require.-19- ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY INC. (Non-Profit Organization) Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs For the Year Ended June 30, 2022 SECTION III – FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS RELATING TO FEDERAL AWARDS, (Continued) Finding No. 2022–004 - Reporting, (Continued) Condition Financial Reporting Student Financial Assistance Cluster As part of our testing, we selected 6 fund request transactions proportionally among the grants as of June 30, 2022. We noted that in all transactions the Institution this not use Form 270, neither a similar document that was properly signed by an authorized official. Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund (HEERF) As part of our testing, we observed that in the quarterly report information was inaccurate, since the Student Portion expense information was not reported. Also, the report of March 2022 quarter was submitted late. Cause Student Financial Assistance Cluster The form was not prepared because the person in charge did not know that it was required. Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund (HEERF) The person in charge was unaware that Student portion information had to be included in the quarterly reports. Effect As a result of this condition, the USDE was prevented from the use of accurate reporting data, which is critical for the effective administration of HEERF program for USDE budgetary policy analysis. Questioned Cost None Context Student Financial Assistance Cluster Of the 62 funds requisitions for 2022, we selected 6 instances in which the Institution did not comply with the financial reporting requirements Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund (HEERF) Of four (4) quarterly reports for 2022, we selected all reports for examinations in which the Institution did not comply with the special reporting requirements. Identification of a Repeat Finding This is not a repeat finding from the immediate previous audit. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions The Institution management agrees with this finding. Please refer to the corrective action plan on pages 22-26. Recommendation Management should reassess the reporting procedures of the federal programs in which the Institution submits the information to the USDE to ensure they comply with the reporting timeframe. The Institution should enhance both electronic and manual procedures to ensure that the required reports are timely and accurately reported to USDE.
Reporting Federal Program Name Student Financial Assistance Cluster Federal Pell Grant Program (PELL), CFDA No. 84.063 Federal Direct Student Loan Program (DL) CFDA No. 84.268 Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund (HEERF) HEERF Institutional Portion, ALN. 84.425F HEERF Minority Serving Institutions (MSIs), ALN. 84.425L Name of Federal Agency U.S. Department of Education Pass-through Entity N/A Criteria Financial Reporting Student Financial Assistance Cluster According to 2 CFR section 200.328, the Federal agency must require only OMB-approved governmentwide data elements on recipient financial reports. OMB requires to use form SF-270 for Request for Advance or Reimbursement (Form 270, Request for Title IV Reimbursement or Heightened Cash Monitoring 2 [0MB No. 1845-0089]) - Applicable to ED programs (using the GS System). Special Reporting Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund (HEERF) According 2 CFR section 200.329 outlines the monitoring and reporting program performance requirements for Federal awards. It emphasizes the responsibility of the recipient and subrecipient for oversight and compliance with applicable Federal requirements. The CARES Act 18004(e) and the CRRSAA 314(e) requires an institution receiving funds under HEERF I and HEERF II to submit a report to the secretary, at such a manner as the secretary may require.-19- ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY INC. (Non-Profit Organization) Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs For the Year Ended June 30, 2022 SECTION III – FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS RELATING TO FEDERAL AWARDS, (Continued) Finding No. 2022–004 - Reporting, (Continued) Condition Financial Reporting Student Financial Assistance Cluster As part of our testing, we selected 6 fund request transactions proportionally among the grants as of June 30, 2022. We noted that in all transactions the Institution this not use Form 270, neither a similar document that was properly signed by an authorized official. Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund (HEERF) As part of our testing, we observed that in the quarterly report information was inaccurate, since the Student Portion expense information was not reported. Also, the report of March 2022 quarter was submitted late. Cause Student Financial Assistance Cluster The form was not prepared because the person in charge did not know that it was required. Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund (HEERF) The person in charge was unaware that Student portion information had to be included in the quarterly reports. Effect As a result of this condition, the USDE was prevented from the use of accurate reporting data, which is critical for the effective administration of HEERF program for USDE budgetary policy analysis. Questioned Cost None Context Student Financial Assistance Cluster Of the 62 funds requisitions for 2022, we selected 6 instances in which the Institution did not comply with the financial reporting requirements Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund (HEERF) Of four (4) quarterly reports for 2022, we selected all reports for examinations in which the Institution did not comply with the special reporting requirements. Identification of a Repeat Finding This is not a repeat finding from the immediate previous audit. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions The Institution management agrees with this finding. Please refer to the corrective action plan on pages 22-26. Recommendation Management should reassess the reporting procedures of the federal programs in which the Institution submits the information to the USDE to ensure they comply with the reporting timeframe. The Institution should enhance both electronic and manual procedures to ensure that the required reports are timely and accurately reported to USDE.
Reporting Federal Program Name Student Financial Assistance Cluster Federal Pell Grant Program (PELL), CFDA No. 84.063 Federal Direct Student Loan Program (DL) CFDA No. 84.268 Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund (HEERF) HEERF Institutional Portion, ALN. 84.425F HEERF Minority Serving Institutions (MSIs), ALN. 84.425L Name of Federal Agency U.S. Department of Education Pass-through Entity N/A Criteria Financial Reporting Student Financial Assistance Cluster According to 2 CFR section 200.328, the Federal agency must require only OMB-approved governmentwide data elements on recipient financial reports. OMB requires to use form SF-270 for Request for Advance or Reimbursement (Form 270, Request for Title IV Reimbursement or Heightened Cash Monitoring 2 [0MB No. 1845-0089]) - Applicable to ED programs (using the GS System). Special Reporting Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund (HEERF) According 2 CFR section 200.329 outlines the monitoring and reporting program performance requirements for Federal awards. It emphasizes the responsibility of the recipient and subrecipient for oversight and compliance with applicable Federal requirements. The CARES Act 18004(e) and the CRRSAA 314(e) requires an institution receiving funds under HEERF I and HEERF II to submit a report to the secretary, at such a manner as the secretary may require.-19- ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY INC. (Non-Profit Organization) Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs For the Year Ended June 30, 2022 SECTION III – FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS RELATING TO FEDERAL AWARDS, (Continued) Finding No. 2022–004 - Reporting, (Continued) Condition Financial Reporting Student Financial Assistance Cluster As part of our testing, we selected 6 fund request transactions proportionally among the grants as of June 30, 2022. We noted that in all transactions the Institution this not use Form 270, neither a similar document that was properly signed by an authorized official. Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund (HEERF) As part of our testing, we observed that in the quarterly report information was inaccurate, since the Student Portion expense information was not reported. Also, the report of March 2022 quarter was submitted late. Cause Student Financial Assistance Cluster The form was not prepared because the person in charge did not know that it was required. Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund (HEERF) The person in charge was unaware that Student portion information had to be included in the quarterly reports. Effect As a result of this condition, the USDE was prevented from the use of accurate reporting data, which is critical for the effective administration of HEERF program for USDE budgetary policy analysis. Questioned Cost None Context Student Financial Assistance Cluster Of the 62 funds requisitions for 2022, we selected 6 instances in which the Institution did not comply with the financial reporting requirements Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund (HEERF) Of four (4) quarterly reports for 2022, we selected all reports for examinations in which the Institution did not comply with the special reporting requirements. Identification of a Repeat Finding This is not a repeat finding from the immediate previous audit. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions The Institution management agrees with this finding. Please refer to the corrective action plan on pages 22-26. Recommendation Management should reassess the reporting procedures of the federal programs in which the Institution submits the information to the USDE to ensure they comply with the reporting timeframe. The Institution should enhance both electronic and manual procedures to ensure that the required reports are timely and accurately reported to USDE.
Reporting Federal Program Name Student Financial Assistance Cluster Federal Pell Grant Program (PELL), CFDA No. 84.063 Federal Direct Student Loan Program (DL) CFDA No. 84.268 Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund (HEERF) HEERF Institutional Portion, ALN. 84.425F HEERF Minority Serving Institutions (MSIs), ALN. 84.425L Name of Federal Agency U.S. Department of Education Pass-through Entity N/A Criteria Financial Reporting Student Financial Assistance Cluster According to 2 CFR section 200.328, the Federal agency must require only OMB-approved governmentwide data elements on recipient financial reports. OMB requires to use form SF-270 for Request for Advance or Reimbursement (Form 270, Request for Title IV Reimbursement or Heightened Cash Monitoring 2 [0MB No. 1845-0089]) - Applicable to ED programs (using the GS System). Special Reporting Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund (HEERF) According 2 CFR section 200.329 outlines the monitoring and reporting program performance requirements for Federal awards. It emphasizes the responsibility of the recipient and subrecipient for oversight and compliance with applicable Federal requirements. The CARES Act 18004(e) and the CRRSAA 314(e) requires an institution receiving funds under HEERF I and HEERF II to submit a report to the secretary, at such a manner as the secretary may require.-19- ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY INC. (Non-Profit Organization) Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs For the Year Ended June 30, 2022 SECTION III – FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS RELATING TO FEDERAL AWARDS, (Continued) Finding No. 2022–004 - Reporting, (Continued) Condition Financial Reporting Student Financial Assistance Cluster As part of our testing, we selected 6 fund request transactions proportionally among the grants as of June 30, 2022. We noted that in all transactions the Institution this not use Form 270, neither a similar document that was properly signed by an authorized official. Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund (HEERF) As part of our testing, we observed that in the quarterly report information was inaccurate, since the Student Portion expense information was not reported. Also, the report of March 2022 quarter was submitted late. Cause Student Financial Assistance Cluster The form was not prepared because the person in charge did not know that it was required. Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund (HEERF) The person in charge was unaware that Student portion information had to be included in the quarterly reports. Effect As a result of this condition, the USDE was prevented from the use of accurate reporting data, which is critical for the effective administration of HEERF program for USDE budgetary policy analysis. Questioned Cost None Context Student Financial Assistance Cluster Of the 62 funds requisitions for 2022, we selected 6 instances in which the Institution did not comply with the financial reporting requirements Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund (HEERF) Of four (4) quarterly reports for 2022, we selected all reports for examinations in which the Institution did not comply with the special reporting requirements. Identification of a Repeat Finding This is not a repeat finding from the immediate previous audit. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions The Institution management agrees with this finding. Please refer to the corrective action plan on pages 22-26. Recommendation Management should reassess the reporting procedures of the federal programs in which the Institution submits the information to the USDE to ensure they comply with the reporting timeframe. The Institution should enhance both electronic and manual procedures to ensure that the required reports are timely and accurately reported to USDE.
Condition: During the test of 100% of expenditures, two (2) expenditures totaling $570,080, for the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, the following noncompliance with the Reporting compliance requirement was noted: • The interim and the 3rd quarter reports were not submitted. • The 2nd quarter report was not timely submitted. • The County improperly reported a vendor as a subrecipient instead of as a vendor relationship. Cause of Condition: Policies and procedures have not been designed and implemented to ensure federal expenditures are properly reported in accordance with federal compliance requirements. Effect of Condition: This condition resulted in noncompliance with federal grant guidelines. Recommendation: OSAI recommends the County gain an understanding of the requirements for this program and implement internal controls to ensure compliance with these requirements. Management Response: Board of County Commissioners: The Board of County Commissioners is responsible for the overall fiscal concerns of the county. See OKLA. STAT. Title 19, § 345. The Board of County Commissioners, with the cooperation and participation of all elected officials, reviews, develops and implements policies and procedures to create a strong internal control environment. The Board of County Commissioners will work with all elected officials, the third-party administrator, and federal, state and local partners to develop policies, procedures, and internal controls designed to accurately track grants, including the application process, verification, oversight, and reporting of grant requirements. These policies and procedures will be designed to identify requirements for recipients and sub-recipients of grants, ensure accurate equipment and real property management, procurement, recipient and subrecipient monitoring and reporting. Further, policies will ensure a proper understanding of all grant requirements and compliance of the same. To assist in this process, the Board of County Commissioners engaged a third-party administrator to oversee the grant process, including application, eligibility, review, requirements, contracting, recipient tracking and oversight, and documentation and reporting. The Board of County Commissioners will work with the third-party administrator to ensure proper grant administration. Criteria: Accountability and stewardship should be overall goals in management’s accounting of federal funds. Internal controls should be designed to monitor compliance with laws and regulations pertaining to grant contracts. Title 2 CFR § 200.303(a) Internal Controls, reads as follows: The non-federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework, “issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Compliance and Reporting Guidance, State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (10. Reporting) reads as follows: All recipients of federal funds must complete financial, performance, and compliance reporting as required and outlines in Part 2 of this guidance. Expenditures may be reported on a cash of accrual basis, as long as the methodology is disclosed and consistently applied. Reporting must be consistent with the definition of expenditures pursuant to 2 CFR 200.1. Your organization should appropriately maintain accounting records for compiling and reporting accurate, compliant financial data, in accordance with appropriate accounting standards and principles. In addition, where appropriate, your organization needs to establish internal controls to ensure completion and timely submission of all mandatory performance and/or compliance reporting. Further, 2 CFR 200.329-Monitoring and reporting Program Performance (c)(1) reads as follows: (c)(1) The non-Federal entity must submit performance reports at the interval required by the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity to best inform improvements in program outcomes and productivity. Intervals must be no less frequent than annually nor more frequent than quarterly except in unusual circumstances, for example where more frequent reporting is necessary for the effective monitoring of the Federal award or could significantly affect program outcomes. Reports submitted annually by the non-Federal entity and/or pass-through entity must be due no later than 90 calendar days after the reporting period. Reports submitted quarterly or semiannually must be due no later than 30 calendar days after the reporting period. Alternatively, the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may require annual reports before the anniversary dates of multiple year Federal awards. The final performance report submitted by the non-Federal entity and/or pass-through entity must be due no later than 120 calendar gays after the period of performance end date. A subrecipient must submit to the pass-through entity, no later than 90 calendar days after the period of performance end date, all final performance reports as required by the terms and conditions of the Federal award. See also §200.344. If a justified request is submitted by a non-Federal entity, the Federal agency may extend the due date for any performance report.
Condition: The Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF) Compliance Report was not maintained and could not be produced. Federal expenditures as reported could not be tested resulting in unreported costs of $2,280,846. Cause of Condition: Policies and procedures have not been designed and implemented to ensure federal expenditures are made in accordance with federal compliance requirements. Effect of Condition: This condition could result in noncompliance with grant requirements. Recommendation: OSAI recommends the County gain an understanding of the grant requirements for this program and implement internal controls to ensure compliance with these grant requirements. Management Response: Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners: This issue originated under the prior County Clerk’s administration where key reporting processes were not followed. The Board of County Commissioners and the other elected officials have made correcting this a top priority. Together, we are: • developing a comprehensive SOP to ensure accurate and timely tracking and reporting of federal funds, • improving communication and oversight between all county offices to ensure consistent reporting standards, • and ensuring annual compliance with federal reporting requirements. Our collective goal is to implement the policies and structures that will keep Osage County operating with the highest standard of accountability and excellence. County Clerk: I was not the County Clerk in office at this time. To correct this issue, the County plans to develop a SOP to timely and accurately track and report on federal funds. The SOP will be reviewed, adopted, and monitored by the Board of County Commissioners. County Treasurer: The County was under the understanding that once we established we were reporting as revenue loss, we would not have to submit the report annually. The final reporting was submitted prior to deadline. Criteria: Compliance and Reporting Guidance, State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (10. Reporting.) reads as follows: All recipients of federal funds must complete financial, performance, and compliance reporting as required and outlined in Part 2 of this guidance. Expenditures may be reported on a cash or accrual basis, as long as the methodology is disclosed and consistently applied. Reporting must be consistent with the definition of expenditures pursuant to 2 CFR 200.1. Your organization should appropriately maintain accounting records for compiling and reporting accurate, compliant financial data, in accordance with appropriate accounting standards and principles.In addition, where appropriate, you organization needs to establish controls to ensure completion and timely submission of all mandatory performance and/or compliance reporting. Further, 2 CFR § 200.329 Monitoring and Reporting Program Performance (c)(1) reads as follows: The non-Federal entity must submit performance reports at the interval required by the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity to best inform improvements in program outcomes and productivity. Intervals must be no less frequent than annually nor more frequent than quarterly except in unusual circumstances, for example where more frequent reporting is necessary for the effective monitoring of the Federal award or could significantly affect program outcomes. Reports submitted annually by the non-Federal entity and/or pass-through entity must be due no later than 90 calendar days after the reporting period. Reports submitted quarterly or semiannually must be due no later than 30 calendar days after the reporting period. Alternatively, the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may require annual reports before the anniversary dates of multiple year Federal awards. The final performance report submitted by the non-Federal entity and/or pass-through entity must be due no later than 120 calendar days after the period of performance end date. A subrecipient must submit to the pass-through entity, no later than 90 calendar days after the period of performance end date, all final performance reports as required by the terms and conditions of the Federal award. See also § 200.344. If a justified request is submitted by a non-Federal entity, the Federal agency may extend the due date for any performance report.
Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: COVID-19 – Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listing Numbers: 84.425E, 84.425F, 84.425K Federal Award Identification Number and Year: P425E200449, P425F204781, P425K200022 Award Period: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance and Other Matters Criteria: The Code of Federal Regulations, 2 CFR 200.303, non-Federal entities receiving Federal awards are required to establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with federal laws, regulations and program compliance requirements. There are three components to reporting for Higher Education Emergency Relief Funds (HEERF): 1) public reporting on the (a)(1) Student Aid Portion; 2) public reporting on the (a)(1) Institutional Portion (a)(2) and (a)(3) subprograms (Quarterly Reporting Form), as applicable; and 3) the annual report. The CARES Act 18004(e) and the CRRSAA 314(e) requires an institution receiving funds under HEERF I and HEERF II to submit a report to the secretary, at such time in such a manner as the secretary may require. While ARP does not explicitly identify procedures by which institutions must report on their uses of HEERF grant funds, the Department of Education exercises this reporting authority under 2 CFR section 200.328 and 2 CFR section 200.329. Condition: The College is not in compliance with Quarterly and Annual reporting requirements for HEERF. Questioned Costs: None. Context: Out of 2 Quarterly Institutional and 2 Quarterly Student reports tested all 4 reports were not submitted timely. In addition, the annual report was not submitted timely. Cause: The College did not have appropriate controls in place to ensure reports were completed and published to the institution’s website in a timely manner. Effect: The institution is not meeting the reporting and information-sharing requirements determined by the Department of Education. As a result, the institution may be subject to additional enforcement actions by the Department of Education including a delay in funding for additional HEERF programs and possibly being determined ineligible for other program funding. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the College review the reporting requirements and implement procedures to ensure that all required reports are issued/posted in an accurate and timely manner. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a plan to correct the finding.
Finding 2022-007: Significant Deficiency - Reporting Program: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund CFDA Number: 84.425 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Federal Award Identification Number: P425E200145, P425F202178, P425M201123 Federal Award Year: June 30, 2022 Repeat of Prior Year Finding 2021-005 Criteria: The CARES Act 18004(e) and the CRRSAA 314(e) requires an institution receiving funds under HEERF I and HEERF II to submit a report to the secretary, at such time in such a manner as the secretary may require. While ARP does not explicitly identify procedures by which institutions must report on their uses of HEERF grant funds, the Department of Education (ED) exercises this reporting authority under 2 CFR section 200.328 and 2 CFR section 200.329. Condition: For the annual report covering January 1, 2021 through December 31, 2021, the University reported the Strengthening Institutions Program funding spent in calendar year 2022 within its 2021 annual report. In addition, for the third quarter 2021 (quarter ending September 30, 2021) and the first quarter 2022 (quarter ending March 31, 2022) institutional portion reports, the University reported the full amount of section (a)(2) Strengthening Institutions Program funding awarded to the University on the section (a)(3) line, when the amount should have been included on the section (a)(2) line. For the third quarter 2021 institutional portion report, the University also reported the lost revenue claimed under the institutional portion of section (a)(1) in the section (a)(2) column, when the amount should have been included in the section (a)(1) column. Also, for the quarterly student portion reports, the University reported the student grants awarded, the number of students eligible to receive a student grant, and the number of students who received a student grant for each individual quarter and not cumulatively from the start of the programs. Questioned Costs: Not applicable. Context: Errors were noted in the one annual report, two quarterly institutional portion reports, and two quarterly student portion reports that were tested. The University was required to file one annual report, four quarterly institutional portion reports, and four quarterly student portion reports during the fiscal year. The sample was not considered statistically valid. Effect: The information included on the publicly-available reports and reports submitted to federal agencies was not accurate. Cause: The exceptions noted on the reports resulted from various factors, including misunderstanding of how reports were intended to be completed and turnover during the year in key personnel associated with preparing and reviewing the reports. Recommendation: It is recommended that the guidance surrounding the preparation of the annual and quarterly reports be reviewed. In addition, the review of reports by someone who is not the original preparer of the reports should include a detailed tie out of numbers included on the reports to the University's supporting documentation. Management's Response: The University agrees with the finding. While the University did not provide the public with data in accordance with the above noted columns and cumulative amounts in the top section related to the HEERF Institutional Aid Portion, the amounts listed and what they were expensed for was correct. Based on the information provided to the University by the Department of Education (ED) and attending other webinars regarding reporting requirements, the University believed it had filed the reports correctly. The University's initial report was reviewed and accepted by ED on June 5, 2020. Based on that acceptance, the University thought it was doing the reports correctly. Since the finding was identified during the audit, the University has submitted the revised reports stated above. The University has a committee to monitor reporting requirements of federal awards consisting of key members of the Executive Team, Business Office, IT and the respective project director. On February 4, 2022, the University received notification from ED that the updated reports had been received, reviewed and added to its file.
Finding 2022-007: Significant Deficiency - Reporting Program: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund CFDA Number: 84.425 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Federal Award Identification Number: P425E200145, P425F202178, P425M201123 Federal Award Year: June 30, 2022 Repeat of Prior Year Finding 2021-005 Criteria: The CARES Act 18004(e) and the CRRSAA 314(e) requires an institution receiving funds under HEERF I and HEERF II to submit a report to the secretary, at such time in such a manner as the secretary may require. While ARP does not explicitly identify procedures by which institutions must report on their uses of HEERF grant funds, the Department of Education (ED) exercises this reporting authority under 2 CFR section 200.328 and 2 CFR section 200.329. Condition: For the annual report covering January 1, 2021 through December 31, 2021, the University reported the Strengthening Institutions Program funding spent in calendar year 2022 within its 2021 annual report. In addition, for the third quarter 2021 (quarter ending September 30, 2021) and the first quarter 2022 (quarter ending March 31, 2022) institutional portion reports, the University reported the full amount of section (a)(2) Strengthening Institutions Program funding awarded to the University on the section (a)(3) line, when the amount should have been included on the section (a)(2) line. For the third quarter 2021 institutional portion report, the University also reported the lost revenue claimed under the institutional portion of section (a)(1) in the section (a)(2) column, when the amount should have been included in the section (a)(1) column. Also, for the quarterly student portion reports, the University reported the student grants awarded, the number of students eligible to receive a student grant, and the number of students who received a student grant for each individual quarter and not cumulatively from the start of the programs. Questioned Costs: Not applicable. Context: Errors were noted in the one annual report, two quarterly institutional portion reports, and two quarterly student portion reports that were tested. The University was required to file one annual report, four quarterly institutional portion reports, and four quarterly student portion reports during the fiscal year. The sample was not considered statistically valid. Effect: The information included on the publicly-available reports and reports submitted to federal agencies was not accurate. Cause: The exceptions noted on the reports resulted from various factors, including misunderstanding of how reports were intended to be completed and turnover during the year in key personnel associated with preparing and reviewing the reports. Recommendation: It is recommended that the guidance surrounding the preparation of the annual and quarterly reports be reviewed. In addition, the review of reports by someone who is not the original preparer of the reports should include a detailed tie out of numbers included on the reports to the University's supporting documentation. Management's Response: The University agrees with the finding. While the University did not provide the public with data in accordance with the above noted columns and cumulative amounts in the top section related to the HEERF Institutional Aid Portion, the amounts listed and what they were expensed for was correct. Based on the information provided to the University by the Department of Education (ED) and attending other webinars regarding reporting requirements, the University believed it had filed the reports correctly. The University's initial report was reviewed and accepted by ED on June 5, 2020. Based on that acceptance, the University thought it was doing the reports correctly. Since the finding was identified during the audit, the University has submitted the revised reports stated above. The University has a committee to monitor reporting requirements of federal awards consisting of key members of the Executive Team, Business Office, IT and the respective project director. On February 4, 2022, the University received notification from ED that the updated reports had been received, reviewed and added to its file.
Finding 2022-007: Significant Deficiency - Reporting Program: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund CFDA Number: 84.425 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Federal Award Identification Number: P425E200145, P425F202178, P425M201123 Federal Award Year: June 30, 2022 Repeat of Prior Year Finding 2021-005 Criteria: The CARES Act 18004(e) and the CRRSAA 314(e) requires an institution receiving funds under HEERF I and HEERF II to submit a report to the secretary, at such time in such a manner as the secretary may require. While ARP does not explicitly identify procedures by which institutions must report on their uses of HEERF grant funds, the Department of Education (ED) exercises this reporting authority under 2 CFR section 200.328 and 2 CFR section 200.329. Condition: For the annual report covering January 1, 2021 through December 31, 2021, the University reported the Strengthening Institutions Program funding spent in calendar year 2022 within its 2021 annual report. In addition, for the third quarter 2021 (quarter ending September 30, 2021) and the first quarter 2022 (quarter ending March 31, 2022) institutional portion reports, the University reported the full amount of section (a)(2) Strengthening Institutions Program funding awarded to the University on the section (a)(3) line, when the amount should have been included on the section (a)(2) line. For the third quarter 2021 institutional portion report, the University also reported the lost revenue claimed under the institutional portion of section (a)(1) in the section (a)(2) column, when the amount should have been included in the section (a)(1) column. Also, for the quarterly student portion reports, the University reported the student grants awarded, the number of students eligible to receive a student grant, and the number of students who received a student grant for each individual quarter and not cumulatively from the start of the programs. Questioned Costs: Not applicable. Context: Errors were noted in the one annual report, two quarterly institutional portion reports, and two quarterly student portion reports that were tested. The University was required to file one annual report, four quarterly institutional portion reports, and four quarterly student portion reports during the fiscal year. The sample was not considered statistically valid. Effect: The information included on the publicly-available reports and reports submitted to federal agencies was not accurate. Cause: The exceptions noted on the reports resulted from various factors, including misunderstanding of how reports were intended to be completed and turnover during the year in key personnel associated with preparing and reviewing the reports. Recommendation: It is recommended that the guidance surrounding the preparation of the annual and quarterly reports be reviewed. In addition, the review of reports by someone who is not the original preparer of the reports should include a detailed tie out of numbers included on the reports to the University's supporting documentation. Management's Response: The University agrees with the finding. While the University did not provide the public with data in accordance with the above noted columns and cumulative amounts in the top section related to the HEERF Institutional Aid Portion, the amounts listed and what they were expensed for was correct. Based on the information provided to the University by the Department of Education (ED) and attending other webinars regarding reporting requirements, the University believed it had filed the reports correctly. The University's initial report was reviewed and accepted by ED on June 5, 2020. Based on that acceptance, the University thought it was doing the reports correctly. Since the finding was identified during the audit, the University has submitted the revised reports stated above. The University has a committee to monitor reporting requirements of federal awards consisting of key members of the Executive Team, Business Office, IT and the respective project director. On February 4, 2022, the University received notification from ED that the updated reports had been received, reviewed and added to its file.
Criteria: Reporting ? Per 2 CFR Part 200.328 and 2CFR Part 200.329, institutions must publicly display on their website the total number of students who have received an Emergency Financial Aid Grant. Institutions are required to submit quarterly budget and expenditure reports detailing institutional expenditures of HEERF funds. Condition: The institution?s count of number of students who have received an Emergency Financial Aid Grant disclosed on the website is not accurate. A quarterly report for institutional portion expenditures was not submitted accurately. Questioned Costs: None. Context: Students eligible to receive an Emergency Financial Aid Grant were reported incorrectly. We received the listing of students used for the reporting disclosures and performed recounts. For the September 30, 2021 disbursement, the College reported 1,291 students received emergency funding instead of the actual number, 1,517, a difference of 226 students. Additionally, for the December 31, 2021 disbursement, the College reported 1,291 students received emergency funding instead of the actual number, 1,514, a difference of 223 students. Finally, the 4th quarter institutional share report inaccurately stated all disbursements were for lost revenues instead of $122,346 being allocated for COVID related expenses. Effect: The disclosures on the website are not accurate. Cause: Internal controls were not adequately designed and implemented to ensure compliance with the program?s reporting requirements. Identification as a Repeat Finding, if Applicable: N/A Recommendation: We recommend implementing controls to ensure the College complies with the programs reporting compliance requirements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Administration concurs with the findings. The College has corrected the website disclosure of number of students receiving Aid Grants under the program. The College will review and confirm accuracy of any future report submissions. Anticipated Completion Date: May 31, 2023
Criteria: Reporting ? Per 2 CFR Part 200.328 and 2CFR Part 200.329, institutions must publicly display on their website the total number of students who have received an Emergency Financial Aid Grant. Institutions are required to submit quarterly budget and expenditure reports detailing institutional expenditures of HEERF funds. Condition: The institution?s count of number of students who have received an Emergency Financial Aid Grant disclosed on the website is not accurate. A quarterly report for institutional portion expenditures was not submitted accurately. Questioned Costs: None. Context: Students eligible to receive an Emergency Financial Aid Grant were reported incorrectly. We received the listing of students used for the reporting disclosures and performed recounts. For the September 30, 2021 disbursement, the College reported 1,291 students received emergency funding instead of the actual number, 1,517, a difference of 226 students. Additionally, for the December 31, 2021 disbursement, the College reported 1,291 students received emergency funding instead of the actual number, 1,514, a difference of 223 students. Finally, the 4th quarter institutional share report inaccurately stated all disbursements were for lost revenues instead of $122,346 being allocated for COVID related expenses. Effect: The disclosures on the website are not accurate. Cause: Internal controls were not adequately designed and implemented to ensure compliance with the program?s reporting requirements. Identification as a Repeat Finding, if Applicable: N/A Recommendation: We recommend implementing controls to ensure the College complies with the programs reporting compliance requirements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Administration concurs with the findings. The College has corrected the website disclosure of number of students receiving Aid Grants under the program. The College will review and confirm accuracy of any future report submissions. Anticipated Completion Date: May 31, 2023
Finding 2022-001 ? Significant Deficiency: COVID-19 Education Stabilization Fund, Higher Education Emergency Relief Funds - Reporting Federal Program: COVID-19 Education Stabilization Fund Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-Through Entity: Not Applicable Assistance Listing Number: 84.425E, 84.425F Federal Award Number: P425E200445 Federal Award Year: June 30, 2022 Criteria: Section 18004 of the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security (CARES) ACT and Section 314(e) of the Coronavirus Response and Relief Supplemental Appropriations (CRRSAA) Act directs institutions receiving funds to promptly and timely provide detailed accounting of the use and expenditures for HEERF (Higher Education Emergency Relief Funds) I, HEERF II, and HEERF III funds. Each institution is required to share in an easily accessible public location quarterly reports (September 30, December 31, March 31, June 30). The reporting is required for both the Student Portion and the Institutional Portion. While the American Rescue Plan (ARP) does not explicitly identify procedures by which institutions submit a report to the Secretary, the Department exercises this reporting authority under 2 CFR 200.328 and 2 CFR 200.329. Condition/Context: The College did not post the required quarterly reports for the Student Portion. Additionally, during the audit, it was noted that the College was unable to provide a copy of the annual report and supporting documentation for the year ended December 31, 2021. Cause: Staff turnover at the College was the primary factor leading to the issues noted above. Effect: The College did not provide the public and the Department with all required data related to HEERF and the Student Portion reports were not posted in a timely manner. Questioned Costs: Not applicable. Recommendation: The College should ensure it keeps up to date on the Department?s HEERF guidance and ensure that reporting is done accurately and timely. Management's Response: MCAD has experienced 100% turnover in the positions responsible for submitting the HEERF reporting. The internal data supporting these reports is accessible for future reporting to be done in a timely manner.
Finding 2022-001 ? Significant Deficiency: COVID-19 Education Stabilization Fund, Higher Education Emergency Relief Funds - Reporting Federal Program: COVID-19 Education Stabilization Fund Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-Through Entity: Not Applicable Assistance Listing Number: 84.425E, 84.425F Federal Award Number: P425E200445 Federal Award Year: June 30, 2022 Criteria: Section 18004 of the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security (CARES) ACT and Section 314(e) of the Coronavirus Response and Relief Supplemental Appropriations (CRRSAA) Act directs institutions receiving funds to promptly and timely provide detailed accounting of the use and expenditures for HEERF (Higher Education Emergency Relief Funds) I, HEERF II, and HEERF III funds. Each institution is required to share in an easily accessible public location quarterly reports (September 30, December 31, March 31, June 30). The reporting is required for both the Student Portion and the Institutional Portion. While the American Rescue Plan (ARP) does not explicitly identify procedures by which institutions submit a report to the Secretary, the Department exercises this reporting authority under 2 CFR 200.328 and 2 CFR 200.329. Condition/Context: The College did not post the required quarterly reports for the Student Portion. Additionally, during the audit, it was noted that the College was unable to provide a copy of the annual report and supporting documentation for the year ended December 31, 2021. Cause: Staff turnover at the College was the primary factor leading to the issues noted above. Effect: The College did not provide the public and the Department with all required data related to HEERF and the Student Portion reports were not posted in a timely manner. Questioned Costs: Not applicable. Recommendation: The College should ensure it keeps up to date on the Department?s HEERF guidance and ensure that reporting is done accurately and timely. Management's Response: MCAD has experienced 100% turnover in the positions responsible for submitting the HEERF reporting. The internal data supporting these reports is accessible for future reporting to be done in a timely manner.
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION ALN #: 84.425F Condition: HEERF reporting was not always done accurately or timely. During the audit, it was noted that the College did not continue to update their website with the HEERF reporting requirements as listed in their grant agreements. The first and second quarterly reports for institutional funds (quarters ended September 30, 2021 and December 31, 2021) was not completed for HEERF II. Criteria: 2 CFR 200.329, 86 FR 26213 The College was required to post the Institutional Quarterly Report to their website within 10 days of the end of the quarter in which the funds were spent. Questioned Costs: None Cause: Turnover in staffing. There were multiple rounds of HEERF funding released, each with different requirements, which led to a gap in understanding of the requirements of the HEERF reporting. Effect: The College was not in compliance with the reporting requirements of HEERF. Identification as repeat finding, if applicable: Not applicable. Recommendation: We recommend that the College complete the HEERF quarterly reporting until the HEERF funding is spent to ensure compliance is maintained. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: See Corrective Action Plan.
Finding 2022-001 Federal program: Education Stabilization Fund -Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund (HEERF): COVID-19 CARES Act- Student Aid Portion AL #: 84.425E Award Year: 2021/2022 Type of finding: Deficiency and Noncompliance Compliance requirement: Reporting - Special Reporting Criteria: Under 2 CFR 200.328 and 200.329, Universities must publicly post certain information relating to Student Aid awards on their website no later than 30 days after award, and update that information within 10 days after the end of every calendar quarter by posting a new report. Condition: Due to the timing of the prior year finding being identified, the award notification report, and first and second quarter reports for FY 2022 were also not posted timely as required. No issues were noted with the accuracy of the disclosure, but the timing was past the required due date. Questioned costs: None Context: The Student Aid grant awards were not reported on the University?s website on a timely basis for the first and second quarters of FY22. Cause: The University established reporting processes according to the compliance supplement. However, in the process of assigning responsibility for each reporting requirement, this requirement of updating the HEERF award disclosures quarterly was missed. Effect: The HEERF Student Aid award information was not reported publicly on the University?s website. As a result, students and other interested parties did not have readily presented access to this data. Repeat finding: Yes ? 2021-001. The finding is limited to the HEERF Student Aid first and second quarter reporting of FY22. Recommendations: We recommend that the University have controls in place to ensure that all required reporting is performed timely. Views of responsible officials: HEERF was issued to institutions of higher education in the spring of 2020 to support students and campus operations in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic. Quarterly reporting requirements were later established by the Department of Education. Student Aid grant award reporting was overlooked by the responsible official due to confusion of duty with the emergency relief program. When the prior-year finding was identified, a system of controls was established to ensure future compliance and timely reporting. Specifically, the responsible reporting officials for the institutional and student portions of HEERF funding combined report information into a single web posting request prior to the deadline each quarter. This single request provided another check for the posting official to confirm the quarterly report was comprehensive.
Finding 2022-007: Significant Deficiency - Reporting Program: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund CFDA Number: 84.425 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Federal Award Identification Number: P425E200145, P425F202178, P425M201123 Federal Award Year: June 30, 2022 Repeat of Prior Year Finding 2021-005 Criteria: The CARES Act 18004(e) and the CRRSAA 314(e) requires an institution receiving funds under HEERF I and HEERF II to submit a report to the secretary, at such time in such a manner as the secretary may require. While ARP does not explicitly identify procedures by which institutions must report on their uses of HEERF grant funds, the Department of Education (ED) exercises this reporting authority under 2 CFR section 200.328 and 2 CFR section 200.329. Condition: For the annual report covering January 1, 2021 through December 31, 2021, the University reported the Strengthening Institutions Program funding spent in calendar year 2022 within its 2021 annual report. In addition, for the third quarter 2021 (quarter ending September 30, 2021) and the first quarter 2022 (quarter ending March 31, 2022) institutional portion reports, the University reported the full amount of section (a)(2) Strengthening Institutions Program funding awarded to the University on the section (a)(3) line, when the amount should have been included on the section (a)(2) line. For the third quarter 2021 institutional portion report, the University also reported the lost revenue claimed under the institutional portion of section (a)(1) in the section (a)(2) column, when the amount should have been included in the section (a)(1) column. Also, for the quarterly student portion reports, the University reported the student grants awarded, the number of students eligible to receive a student grant, and the number of students who received a student grant for each individual quarter and not cumulatively from the start of the programs. Questioned Costs: Not applicable. Context: Errors were noted in the one annual report, two quarterly institutional portion reports, and two quarterly student portion reports that were tested. The University was required to file one annual report, four quarterly institutional portion reports, and four quarterly student portion reports during the fiscal year. The sample was not considered statistically valid. Effect: The information included on the publicly-available reports and reports submitted to federal agencies was not accurate. Cause: The exceptions noted on the reports resulted from various factors, including misunderstanding of how reports were intended to be completed and turnover during the year in key personnel associated with preparing and reviewing the reports. Recommendation: It is recommended that the guidance surrounding the preparation of the annual and quarterly reports be reviewed. In addition, the review of reports by someone who is not the original preparer of the reports should include a detailed tie out of numbers included on the reports to the University's supporting documentation. Management's Response: The University agrees with the finding. While the University did not provide the public with data in accordance with the above noted columns and cumulative amounts in the top section related to the HEERF Institutional Aid Portion, the amounts listed and what they were expensed for was correct. Based on the information provided to the University by the Department of Education (ED) and attending other webinars regarding reporting requirements, the University believed it had filed the reports correctly. The University's initial report was reviewed and accepted by ED on June 5, 2020. Based on that acceptance, the University thought it was doing the reports correctly. Since the finding was identified during the audit, the University has submitted the revised reports stated above. The University has a committee to monitor reporting requirements of federal awards consisting of key members of the Executive Team, Business Office, IT and the respective project director. On February 4, 2022, the University received notification from ED that the updated reports had been received, reviewed and added to its file.
Finding 2022-007: Significant Deficiency - Reporting Program: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund CFDA Number: 84.425 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Federal Award Identification Number: P425E200145, P425F202178, P425M201123 Federal Award Year: June 30, 2022 Repeat of Prior Year Finding 2021-005 Criteria: The CARES Act 18004(e) and the CRRSAA 314(e) requires an institution receiving funds under HEERF I and HEERF II to submit a report to the secretary, at such time in such a manner as the secretary may require. While ARP does not explicitly identify procedures by which institutions must report on their uses of HEERF grant funds, the Department of Education (ED) exercises this reporting authority under 2 CFR section 200.328 and 2 CFR section 200.329. Condition: For the annual report covering January 1, 2021 through December 31, 2021, the University reported the Strengthening Institutions Program funding spent in calendar year 2022 within its 2021 annual report. In addition, for the third quarter 2021 (quarter ending September 30, 2021) and the first quarter 2022 (quarter ending March 31, 2022) institutional portion reports, the University reported the full amount of section (a)(2) Strengthening Institutions Program funding awarded to the University on the section (a)(3) line, when the amount should have been included on the section (a)(2) line. For the third quarter 2021 institutional portion report, the University also reported the lost revenue claimed under the institutional portion of section (a)(1) in the section (a)(2) column, when the amount should have been included in the section (a)(1) column. Also, for the quarterly student portion reports, the University reported the student grants awarded, the number of students eligible to receive a student grant, and the number of students who received a student grant for each individual quarter and not cumulatively from the start of the programs. Questioned Costs: Not applicable. Context: Errors were noted in the one annual report, two quarterly institutional portion reports, and two quarterly student portion reports that were tested. The University was required to file one annual report, four quarterly institutional portion reports, and four quarterly student portion reports during the fiscal year. The sample was not considered statistically valid. Effect: The information included on the publicly-available reports and reports submitted to federal agencies was not accurate. Cause: The exceptions noted on the reports resulted from various factors, including misunderstanding of how reports were intended to be completed and turnover during the year in key personnel associated with preparing and reviewing the reports. Recommendation: It is recommended that the guidance surrounding the preparation of the annual and quarterly reports be reviewed. In addition, the review of reports by someone who is not the original preparer of the reports should include a detailed tie out of numbers included on the reports to the University's supporting documentation. Management's Response: The University agrees with the finding. While the University did not provide the public with data in accordance with the above noted columns and cumulative amounts in the top section related to the HEERF Institutional Aid Portion, the amounts listed and what they were expensed for was correct. Based on the information provided to the University by the Department of Education (ED) and attending other webinars regarding reporting requirements, the University believed it had filed the reports correctly. The University's initial report was reviewed and accepted by ED on June 5, 2020. Based on that acceptance, the University thought it was doing the reports correctly. Since the finding was identified during the audit, the University has submitted the revised reports stated above. The University has a committee to monitor reporting requirements of federal awards consisting of key members of the Executive Team, Business Office, IT and the respective project director. On February 4, 2022, the University received notification from ED that the updated reports had been received, reviewed and added to its file.
Finding 2022-007: Significant Deficiency - Reporting Program: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund CFDA Number: 84.425 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Federal Award Identification Number: P425E200145, P425F202178, P425M201123 Federal Award Year: June 30, 2022 Repeat of Prior Year Finding 2021-005 Criteria: The CARES Act 18004(e) and the CRRSAA 314(e) requires an institution receiving funds under HEERF I and HEERF II to submit a report to the secretary, at such time in such a manner as the secretary may require. While ARP does not explicitly identify procedures by which institutions must report on their uses of HEERF grant funds, the Department of Education (ED) exercises this reporting authority under 2 CFR section 200.328 and 2 CFR section 200.329. Condition: For the annual report covering January 1, 2021 through December 31, 2021, the University reported the Strengthening Institutions Program funding spent in calendar year 2022 within its 2021 annual report. In addition, for the third quarter 2021 (quarter ending September 30, 2021) and the first quarter 2022 (quarter ending March 31, 2022) institutional portion reports, the University reported the full amount of section (a)(2) Strengthening Institutions Program funding awarded to the University on the section (a)(3) line, when the amount should have been included on the section (a)(2) line. For the third quarter 2021 institutional portion report, the University also reported the lost revenue claimed under the institutional portion of section (a)(1) in the section (a)(2) column, when the amount should have been included in the section (a)(1) column. Also, for the quarterly student portion reports, the University reported the student grants awarded, the number of students eligible to receive a student grant, and the number of students who received a student grant for each individual quarter and not cumulatively from the start of the programs. Questioned Costs: Not applicable. Context: Errors were noted in the one annual report, two quarterly institutional portion reports, and two quarterly student portion reports that were tested. The University was required to file one annual report, four quarterly institutional portion reports, and four quarterly student portion reports during the fiscal year. The sample was not considered statistically valid. Effect: The information included on the publicly-available reports and reports submitted to federal agencies was not accurate. Cause: The exceptions noted on the reports resulted from various factors, including misunderstanding of how reports were intended to be completed and turnover during the year in key personnel associated with preparing and reviewing the reports. Recommendation: It is recommended that the guidance surrounding the preparation of the annual and quarterly reports be reviewed. In addition, the review of reports by someone who is not the original preparer of the reports should include a detailed tie out of numbers included on the reports to the University's supporting documentation. Management's Response: The University agrees with the finding. While the University did not provide the public with data in accordance with the above noted columns and cumulative amounts in the top section related to the HEERF Institutional Aid Portion, the amounts listed and what they were expensed for was correct. Based on the information provided to the University by the Department of Education (ED) and attending other webinars regarding reporting requirements, the University believed it had filed the reports correctly. The University's initial report was reviewed and accepted by ED on June 5, 2020. Based on that acceptance, the University thought it was doing the reports correctly. Since the finding was identified during the audit, the University has submitted the revised reports stated above. The University has a committee to monitor reporting requirements of federal awards consisting of key members of the Executive Team, Business Office, IT and the respective project director. On February 4, 2022, the University received notification from ED that the updated reports had been received, reviewed and added to its file.
Criteria: Reporting ? Per 2 CFR Part 200.328 and 2CFR Part 200.329, institutions must publicly display on their website the total number of students who have received an Emergency Financial Aid Grant. Institutions are required to submit quarterly budget and expenditure reports detailing institutional expenditures of HEERF funds. Condition: The institution?s count of number of students who have received an Emergency Financial Aid Grant disclosed on the website is not accurate. A quarterly report for institutional portion expenditures was not submitted accurately. Questioned Costs: None. Context: Students eligible to receive an Emergency Financial Aid Grant were reported incorrectly. We received the listing of students used for the reporting disclosures and performed recounts. For the September 30, 2021 disbursement, the College reported 1,291 students received emergency funding instead of the actual number, 1,517, a difference of 226 students. Additionally, for the December 31, 2021 disbursement, the College reported 1,291 students received emergency funding instead of the actual number, 1,514, a difference of 223 students. Finally, the 4th quarter institutional share report inaccurately stated all disbursements were for lost revenues instead of $122,346 being allocated for COVID related expenses. Effect: The disclosures on the website are not accurate. Cause: Internal controls were not adequately designed and implemented to ensure compliance with the program?s reporting requirements. Identification as a Repeat Finding, if Applicable: N/A Recommendation: We recommend implementing controls to ensure the College complies with the programs reporting compliance requirements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Administration concurs with the findings. The College has corrected the website disclosure of number of students receiving Aid Grants under the program. The College will review and confirm accuracy of any future report submissions. Anticipated Completion Date: May 31, 2023
Criteria: Reporting ? Per 2 CFR Part 200.328 and 2CFR Part 200.329, institutions must publicly display on their website the total number of students who have received an Emergency Financial Aid Grant. Institutions are required to submit quarterly budget and expenditure reports detailing institutional expenditures of HEERF funds. Condition: The institution?s count of number of students who have received an Emergency Financial Aid Grant disclosed on the website is not accurate. A quarterly report for institutional portion expenditures was not submitted accurately. Questioned Costs: None. Context: Students eligible to receive an Emergency Financial Aid Grant were reported incorrectly. We received the listing of students used for the reporting disclosures and performed recounts. For the September 30, 2021 disbursement, the College reported 1,291 students received emergency funding instead of the actual number, 1,517, a difference of 226 students. Additionally, for the December 31, 2021 disbursement, the College reported 1,291 students received emergency funding instead of the actual number, 1,514, a difference of 223 students. Finally, the 4th quarter institutional share report inaccurately stated all disbursements were for lost revenues instead of $122,346 being allocated for COVID related expenses. Effect: The disclosures on the website are not accurate. Cause: Internal controls were not adequately designed and implemented to ensure compliance with the program?s reporting requirements. Identification as a Repeat Finding, if Applicable: N/A Recommendation: We recommend implementing controls to ensure the College complies with the programs reporting compliance requirements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Administration concurs with the findings. The College has corrected the website disclosure of number of students receiving Aid Grants under the program. The College will review and confirm accuracy of any future report submissions. Anticipated Completion Date: May 31, 2023
Finding 2022-001 ? Significant Deficiency: COVID-19 Education Stabilization Fund, Higher Education Emergency Relief Funds - Reporting Federal Program: COVID-19 Education Stabilization Fund Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-Through Entity: Not Applicable Assistance Listing Number: 84.425E, 84.425F Federal Award Number: P425E200445 Federal Award Year: June 30, 2022 Criteria: Section 18004 of the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security (CARES) ACT and Section 314(e) of the Coronavirus Response and Relief Supplemental Appropriations (CRRSAA) Act directs institutions receiving funds to promptly and timely provide detailed accounting of the use and expenditures for HEERF (Higher Education Emergency Relief Funds) I, HEERF II, and HEERF III funds. Each institution is required to share in an easily accessible public location quarterly reports (September 30, December 31, March 31, June 30). The reporting is required for both the Student Portion and the Institutional Portion. While the American Rescue Plan (ARP) does not explicitly identify procedures by which institutions submit a report to the Secretary, the Department exercises this reporting authority under 2 CFR 200.328 and 2 CFR 200.329. Condition/Context: The College did not post the required quarterly reports for the Student Portion. Additionally, during the audit, it was noted that the College was unable to provide a copy of the annual report and supporting documentation for the year ended December 31, 2021. Cause: Staff turnover at the College was the primary factor leading to the issues noted above. Effect: The College did not provide the public and the Department with all required data related to HEERF and the Student Portion reports were not posted in a timely manner. Questioned Costs: Not applicable. Recommendation: The College should ensure it keeps up to date on the Department?s HEERF guidance and ensure that reporting is done accurately and timely. Management's Response: MCAD has experienced 100% turnover in the positions responsible for submitting the HEERF reporting. The internal data supporting these reports is accessible for future reporting to be done in a timely manner.
Finding 2022-001 ? Significant Deficiency: COVID-19 Education Stabilization Fund, Higher Education Emergency Relief Funds - Reporting Federal Program: COVID-19 Education Stabilization Fund Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-Through Entity: Not Applicable Assistance Listing Number: 84.425E, 84.425F Federal Award Number: P425E200445 Federal Award Year: June 30, 2022 Criteria: Section 18004 of the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security (CARES) ACT and Section 314(e) of the Coronavirus Response and Relief Supplemental Appropriations (CRRSAA) Act directs institutions receiving funds to promptly and timely provide detailed accounting of the use and expenditures for HEERF (Higher Education Emergency Relief Funds) I, HEERF II, and HEERF III funds. Each institution is required to share in an easily accessible public location quarterly reports (September 30, December 31, March 31, June 30). The reporting is required for both the Student Portion and the Institutional Portion. While the American Rescue Plan (ARP) does not explicitly identify procedures by which institutions submit a report to the Secretary, the Department exercises this reporting authority under 2 CFR 200.328 and 2 CFR 200.329. Condition/Context: The College did not post the required quarterly reports for the Student Portion. Additionally, during the audit, it was noted that the College was unable to provide a copy of the annual report and supporting documentation for the year ended December 31, 2021. Cause: Staff turnover at the College was the primary factor leading to the issues noted above. Effect: The College did not provide the public and the Department with all required data related to HEERF and the Student Portion reports were not posted in a timely manner. Questioned Costs: Not applicable. Recommendation: The College should ensure it keeps up to date on the Department?s HEERF guidance and ensure that reporting is done accurately and timely. Management's Response: MCAD has experienced 100% turnover in the positions responsible for submitting the HEERF reporting. The internal data supporting these reports is accessible for future reporting to be done in a timely manner.