Findings Citing § 200.327

Finding 2024-002 – Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/ Cost Principles, and Procurement Program Name (ALN): Public Transportation Emergency Relief Program (ALN 20.527) Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Grant Numbers and Years: NJ-44-X004-02 (Federal fiscal years 2012–2025) Statistically Valid Sample: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample Finding Type: Significant Deficiency and Noncompliance Repeat Finding: No Criteria: Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/ Cost Principles Except where otherwise authorized by statute, cost must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under federal awards; (1) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the federal award and be allocable thereto under the principles in 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart E. (2) Be adequately documented. Procurement Non-Federal Entities Other than States Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.327. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-federal entity must: (1) Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. Additionally, In accordance with federal requirements, the Port Authority shall maintain internal controls over federal programs designed to provide reasonable assurance that transactions are executed in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award that could have a direct and material effect on a federal program. Condition: The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey (the Port Authority) used funds received from the Public Transportation Emergency Relief Program (the Program) to purchase equipment to perform maintenance and inspection of the track damaged by Superstorm Sandy, repair the damage, and allow the Port Authority to be more resilient in future events. As part of our testing over the procurement requirements for the Program, we noted for one out of eleven vendors sampled subject to the Port Authority’s procurement policies for a covered transaction, the vendor was operating and incurring expenditures under a call-in contract that did not meet certain federal procurement requirements established by the Port Authority for other federal awards, with total expenditures of $23,772 for the year ended December 31, 2024. The total amount of expenditures for vendors subject to the procurement requirements of the Program and the Port Authority’s procurement policies for a covered transaction during fiscal year 2024 was $4,263,131, and the total amount of other-than-personal service costs for the Program during fiscal year 2024 was $65,782,642. We noted that the vendor was neither suspended nor debarred from receiving federal funds, and also has other procurement contracts with the Port Authority that meet federal procurement requirements. Cause: The Port Authority used the incorrect procurement contract for this vendor that did not meet certain federal procurement requirements and the error was not detected as part of the Port Authority’s established policies and procedures. Effect: The expenditures charged by the vendor to the Program under the wrong procurement contract were not allowable, as there was no awarding contract to the vendor that met all federal procurement requirements established by the Port Authority. Questioned Costs: $23,772. In addition to the known questioned costs, we have identified $338,252 as likely questioned costs, based on amounts included in our sampled items tested and the total population of other-than-personal service costs noted above. Recommendation: We recommend that the Port Authority strengthen its policies and procedures to ensure all vendors have the appropriate contracting awards in accordance with federal procurement requirements for charging allowable expenditures under the requirements of the Program. Views of Responsible Officials Although federal funds were not received for this expenditure, PATH acknowledges an internal control deficiency regarding the recognition of grant funding for work performed under standard nonfederal engineering call-in contracts. PATH will continue to work collaboratively with the Engineering and Procurement Departments to strengthen internal communications and reinforce adherence to established protocols governing capital projects that are eligible for federal funding.

2024-003—REPORTING Type of Finding (F) Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Compliance of Federal Awards (G) Instance of Noncompliance related to Federal Awards Funding Agency U.S. Department of Agriculture (“USDA”) Programs Beginning Farmer and Rancher Development Program; Award: BFRDP-2023-49400-40894 (AL 10.311); Period: 09/15/2023-09/14/2026 Partnerships for Climate-Smart Commodities; Award: USDA/NR243A750004G005 (AL 10.937); Period: 11/02/2023 -11/01/2028 Questioned Costs None identified Statement of Condition During our testing of the Reporting Compliance requirement for the major federal programs, we noted the SF-425 reports were generated based on Harvest billing/tracking system and not properly reconciled to the general ledger (QuickBooks). In addition, some other minor clerical errors were also present. Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.327 (Financial Reporting) and award terms requiring SF-425 is required to be submitted for the Beginning Farmer and Rancher Development Program and Partnerships for Climate-Smart Commodities program. Recipients use the SF-425 as a standardized format to report expenditures under Federal awards, as well as, when applicable, cash status. The report should be reconciled to the general ledger on same basis as marked on the SF-425. Also, the reports need to be reviewed for accuracy and completeness. Cause Reports were submitted based on the tracking/billing system (Harvest) and not reconciled to QuickBooks. Effect Reports could have errors and jeopardize future federal funding. Recommendation Quivira should implement procedures and controls to ensure that the federal reports are reconciled, reviewed for accuracy and completeness before submission. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action Management agrees that, despite regular reviews of SF-425 reports for accuracy and completeness, current steps were not adequate to ensure federal reports are reconciled and reviewed for accuracy and completeness before submission. This finding is directly connected to 2024-001, and the same action steps will address this finding. To correct for this significant deficiency, Quivira Coalition will:Action Step Detail Date Responsible Party Develop a new, compliant method to allocate personnel costs for federal billing and reporting. Stop using the timekeeping system (Harvest) for allocation. The new method must properly reflect actual paid salaries, paid fringe, and actual time spent. 12/31/2025 Accounting Firm Update reporting process to reconcile all costs reported on the SF-425 to the general ledger (instead of the timekeeping system) using the new federal grants billing process. Keep detailed records of the reconciliation. 12/31/2025 Accounting Firm Implement a monthly reconciliation process between the time and expense system (Harvest) and the QuickBooks general ledger to reconcile all non-personnel expenses. 1/30/2026 Operations Director Document the grant management process, including new reporting processes, required reconciliations, monitoring policies, and allowable cost management to ensure consistency across the organization. 2/28/2026 Operations Director Update policies and procedures to require that expenses reported on the SEFA form come directly from the accounting system to ensure this continues. 1/30/2026 Operations Director Update policies and procedures to require an annual reconciliation between the SF-425 and SEFA reports to ensure this continues. This occurs before submitting the SEFA report. 1/30/2026 Operations Director Reconcile all grant programs active in 2024 using updated processes and resolve any discrepancies with federal reports or billing. 1/30/2026 Initial Review - Operations Director & Grants Manager Secondary Review & Corrections (if needed) - Accounting Firm Develop a plan to ensure regular and sufficient training on Uniform Guidance tracking regulatory changes, and how to implement changes. Update policies and procedures. 11/30/2025 Operations Director & Executive Director Update policies and procedures to require an additional level of review and approval for SF-425 and SEFA reports and reconciliations for accuracy and completeness before they are submitted. 12/31/2025 Operations Director with final approval from the Executive Director

Finding 2024-003: Procurement Policy Federal Agency: Department of Commerce Pass-Through Entities: North Pacific Research Board, Alaska Department of Fish and Game Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 11.437, 11.469, 11.472 Award Year: January 1, 2024-December 31, 2024 Program Expenditures: $2,462,741 Criteria: In accordance with Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (2 CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, Subpart D, Procurement Standards (200.317-200.327), entities receiving federal awards are required to have a procurement policy that meets specific compliance criteria. Condition and context: In 2024, the Foundation operated without a formal procurement policy, resulting in significant deficiencies in internal control. The Foundation operated informally with procedures in place to ensure compliance, including internal controls over procurement and suspension and debarment, but lacked the written policy until 2025 when it was implemented by the Board formally. Cause: The Foundation lacked sufficient written policy to comply with federal funding requirements. Effect: The Foundation did not have proper policies in place, as required by federal agencies. Questioned Costs: $0 Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend Bering Sea Fisheries Research Foundation formally implement a procurement policy. View of Responsible Officials and planned corrective actions: Management agrees with the finding. Please see corrective action plan attached.

2024 -002 Documentation of Procurement History - Significant Deficiency - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Federal Agency - US Department of Treasury Federal Award Number - 21.027 Pass-Through Entity - State of Nevada Criteria: The Uniform Guidance in 2 CFR Section 200.317 through 200.327 requires that non-Federal entities must have and use documented procedures which conform to the procurement standards identified. Uniform Guidance 200.218 specifically requires that non-Federal entities must maintain records sufficient to detail the history or procurement. Condition: During the course of the audit, the engagement team noted one instance of procurement where sufficient records to detail the history of procurement were not maintained in accordance with the Organization's procurement policy. Cause: Documentation of procurement activity is not maintained in accordance with the Organization's procurement policy. Effect: The Organization could make procurement activity is not maintained in accordance with the Organization's procurement policy. Questioned Costs: Not applicable. Context: Controls over compliance put in place by management were not operating effectively as it relates to this compliance requirement. Identification As A Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: The Organization should develop a written consistent process and documentation system to capture procurement history in accordance with the Organization's procurement policy. View Of Responsible Officials: Management of the Organization concurs with the audit finding and will comply with all procurement requirements.

Assistance Listing 10.766 Title Community Facilities Loans and Grants Federal Grantor U.S. Department of Agriculture Compliance Area Reporting Type of Finding Internal Control – Significant Deficiency Questioned Costs None Reported Repeat Finding Yes Criteria 2 CFR 200.327 establishes that reports be complete, accurate, and supported by accounting records (if applicable) and be submitted in compliance with the appropriate deadlines. Condition Westward Heights submitted multiple reports to the USDA after the required due dates. Cause Westward Heights did not have an internal control policy in place to ensure timely closing of month-end or year-end financials. Effect The lack of policy resulted in multiple reports being submitted to the USDA after the due date. Recommendation We recommend that Westward Heights establish deadlines for accounting personnel to complete month-end and year-end financials. Views of Responsible Officials Management and Westward Heights’ Board of Directors agree with the finding. See Westward Heights’ Corrective Action Plan for Finding 2024-002.

Mental and Behavioral Health Education and Training Grants Assistance Listing No. 93.732 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Program Year 2024 Criteria or Specific Requirement – Procurement, Suspension and Debarment (2 CFR 200.317 – 200.327; 2 CFR 180.220) Condition – The District is required to follow its own documented procurement procedures which conform to the Uniform Guidance procurement standards. Questioned Costs – $56,306 - calculated as contracts tested that were not properly procured and known contracts tested in prior years that were not properly procured. Context – Out of a population of five contracts directly charged to the grant that were above the micro-purchase threshold, two contracts were selected for testing. Our sampling method was not and was not meant to be statistically valid. The District did not obtain price or rate quotations from an adequate number of qualified sources for one of the vendors selected for testing. Although not selected for testing, the vendor related to the 2023-001 finding was also included in the population of contracts directly charged to the grant. Therefore, questioned costs also include expenses for a second vendor for which it is known the District did not obtain price or rate quotations from an adequate number of qualified sources. Effect – The District did not provide for full and open competition in procuring services with grant funds. Cause – The District included the vendors in the grant application and program narrative which was approved by the grantor. After notification of approval, the District moved forward with the vendors and did not follow procurement guidelines. Identification as a repeat finding – 2023-001 Recommendation – Contracts directly charged to a federal award should be reviewed to ensure compliance with the Uniform Guidance. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions – Responsible Official: Aaron Davis, VP & Chief Experience Officer Planned Corrective Actions: The first contract in question was for a vendor (Healthsource Solutions) already under contract with the District prior to the grant application. The vendor in question had been used since at least 2010, with the most recent contract for the current wellness portal (Wellness +) beginning in 2017. Because of the success of the wellness portal and established relationship with the vendor, the District included expansion of existing platforms and additional services provided by Healthsource Solutions as a large component of the Methodology/ Approach in the proposed activities of the grant narrative submitted. Use of this vendor and its applications were specifically outlined in the grant project narrative and a critical component of meeting grant objectives. The second contract in question was for the Evaluation Group, which provided specific services around grant program evaluation. This vendor was included in the original grant application and selected via the grant consultant used during the grant application process. The District follows the Lubbock County Purchasing Guidelines, which conform to the Uniform Guidance procurement standards. The District has reviewed the specified requirements of the Uniform Guidance for procurement standards, specifically related to noncompetitive procurement and concurs that formal procurement methods were not used for expansion of new services with this existing vendor nor was adequate documentation provided for noncompetitive procurement. In order to ensure compliance with the Uniform Guidance, the District will provide training to existing grant Program Managers on Uniform Guidance procurement standards. Additionally, if a new grant is being pursued, the grant committee should receive training on Uniform Guidance procurement standards before completing grant applications. On existing or future grants, any potential contracts or purchases over $75,000 should be reviewed by the grant Program Manager (or Grant Committee lead if a Program Manager has not yet been assigned) to ensure all procurement guidelines are followed and sufficient documentation is obtained prior to purchase or contract execution.

Program: Continuum of Care Federal Financial Assistance Listing No.: 14.267 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Pass-through: Sacramento Steps Forward Award Year: 2024 Compliance Requirement: Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Grant Award Number: CA0955L9T032209, CA0955L9T032310, CA0143L9T032215, CA0143L9T032316, CA1303L9T032208, CA1303L9T032309 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls Over Compliance Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303(a) of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) establishes that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides assurance that the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and conditions of the federal award. The nonfederal entity’s documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in 2 CFR 200.317 through 200.327. 2 CFR 200 Appendix II requires certain provisions be included in contracts if criteria are met. Condition: The Organization’s documented procurement policy does not incorporate several required elements outlined in 2 CFR §§200.317 through 200.327. Missing elements include, but are not limited to: • Defined procurement methods and thresholds (e.g., micro-purchase, sealed bids), • Procedures to ensure full and open competition, • Requirements for cost or price analysis for purchases above the simplified acquisition threshold, • Affirmative steps to use small and minority businesses and women’s business enterprises, • Procedures for contract administration and oversight, • Inclusion of required contract provisions as listed in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, • Standards of conduct covering conflicts of interest for employees involved in the selection, award, and administration of contracts. Cause: The Organization’s procurement policy has not been updated to reflect the detailed procurement standards required under the Uniform Guidance. Effect: An incomplete procurement policy may lead to inconsistent practices and increase the risk of noncompliance with federal procurement requirements, potentially affecting the allowability and documentation of costs charged to federal awards. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs were identified as a result of our procedures. Context: This finding was identified during testing of the Organization’s procurement policy under the Continuum of Care Program. Repeat Finding from Prior Year: Partial repeat of Finding 2023-003. The prior finding included both procurement policy deficiencies and lack of suspension and debarment documentation. The current year finding relates only to the procurement policy. Recommendation: We recommend that management revise the Organization’s procurement policy to incorporate all required elements outlined in 2 CFR §§200.317 through 200.327, including definitions of procurement methods, competitive requirements, cost/price analysis, contract provisions, and oversight responsibilities. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees. See separately issued Corrective Action Plan.

FINDING 2024-003 Subject: Water and Waste Disposal Systems for Rural Communities - Procurement Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Program: Water and Waste Disposal Systems for Rural Communities Assistance Listings Number: 10.760 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 92-02, 92-03, 92-04, 92-05 Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context As part of sound management of the federal award, the City was responsible for implementing a system of internal controls that would ensure compliance with the applicable requirements. The City had not properly designed or implemented such a system, which would include appropriate segregation of duties, that would likely be effective in preventing, or detecting and correcting, noncompliance. Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000 unless a lower, more restrictive threshold is set by a nonfederal entity. The State of Indiana has established a more restrictive threshold of $150,000 for informal procurement methods. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds: micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Small purchase procedures require that price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources or documented reasoning to support a single source provider. Two vendors were identified that were paid $10,500 and $59,408, respectively, during the audit period using federal funds under the award, thereby requiring small purchase procedures for both procurements. Both vendors were selected for testing. The City was unable to provide any documentation for either vendor that the procurement method used was appropriate or that the procurement provided full and open competition or rationale to support the determination to limit competition. Additionally, the history of the procurement, including the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of the vendor, and the basis for the price, was not adequately documented for either vendor. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318 states in part: "(a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. . . . (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. . . ." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use document procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases- (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . . (c) Noncompetitive procurement. There are specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. Noncompetitive procurement can only be awarded if one or more of the following circumstances apply: (1) The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold (see paragraph (a)(1) of this section); (2) The item is available only from a single source; (3) The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from publicizing a competitive solicitation; (4) The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity expressly authorizes a noncompetitive procurement in response to a written request from the non-Federal entity; or (5) After solicitation of a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate." Cause The vendors in question had been utilized by the City for various services over the course of multiple years, including for several years under this award with the ongoing multi-year project. For continuity purposes, the City chose to limit competition when procuring the services. The City included the requirements for limiting competition in its purchasing policy but did not follow the established policy. Effect Without a proper system of internal controls in place that operated effectively, noncompliance remained undetected. As a result, proper procurement procedures were not adhered to for all vendors. Without following the required methods for procurement, the City could be overpaying for services by not receiving the most competitive pricing. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the City. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the City's management establish a proper system of internal controls to ensure expenditures made from federal awards use the appropriate procurement method and retain the documentation to support the procurement methods used in order to ensure compliance with the terms and conditions of the federal award. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.

Criteria: The County is required to follow procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.327. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. Condition: The County has procurement policies in place; however, those procedures were not followed for grant disbursements. Context: A test of grant disbursements revealed the County did not follow competitive bid requirements for the grant disbursements. Effect: The County risks overpayment by not following competitive bid process. Cause: The County did not have specific procedures in place to ensure all required disbursements follow the competitive bid process. Questioned Costs: The County may have received a lower bid, but the difference would be immaterial to the federal program and below the questioned cost threshold. Recommendation: We recommend the County implement procedures to strictly comply with the requirements of 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.327, as it related to federal procurement requirements. Response: The County is aware that its policy on procurement was not followed in this situation and has taken steps to correct the situation for future purchases related to this program.

U.S. Department of Treasury - direct funding COVID 19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds - 21.027 Criteria or Specific Requirement: Procurement and Significant Deficiency In accordance with 2 CFR 200.318, recipients and subrecipients must maintain and use documented procedures for procurement transactions under a Federal award or subaward, including acquisition of property and services. These documented procurement procedures must be consistent with State, local and tribal laws and regulations and the standards identified in 2 CFR 200.317 through 2 CFR 200.327. Condition: During our test work over the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery grant, we noted the Unified Government did not perform procurement procedures on two of its vendor contracts. Cause: The vendors identified were granted a non-competitive procurement under national emergency conditions due to the effects of COVID-19. However, the vendor was utilized again after the national emergency period and the Unified Government's procurement policy should have been followed at this time, but was not. Effect: Federal funds could be paid to entities outside of the Unified Government's procurement policy. Questioned Costs - $15,000 - This represents the total purchase for the two vendors which did not follow the Unified Government's formal procurement procedures. These charges were included in the direct award received from the U.S. Department of Treasury. Context: For 21.027, there were 50 vendors receiving a total of $10,862,254 subject to procurement requirements. Of those 50, a sample of thirteen vendors receiving a total of $1,523,729 were selected for testing. Two of the thirteen vendors selected for testing did not undergo the Unified Government's formal procurement procedures. The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Identification of Prior Year Finding: 2023-011 Recommendation: We recommend that the Unified Government communicate to all departments that purchases using federal funds follow the procurement policy procedures prior to purchase and the procurement department provide training on the requirements to properly document that the procedures are completed. View of Responsible Official and Planned Corrective Actions: We agree with the finding. See management corrective action plan.

2024 – 004 Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: U.S. Department of the Interior Federal Program Name: Outdoor Recreation Acquisition, Development, and Planning Assistance Listing Number: 15.916 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: P23AP01170 - 2023 Pass-Through Agency: Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Pass-Through Number(s): 55-01943 Award Period: September 1, 2023 – September 30, 2025 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matter Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR 200.318 requires grant recipients and subrecipients to have documented procurement procedures. These documented procedures must be consistent with the regulations and standards identified in Section 200.317-200.327. The grant recipient or subrecipient must also maintain written standards of conduct covering conflicts of interest and governing the actions of its employees engaged in the selection, award, and administration of contracts. No employee, officer, agent, or board member with a real or apparent conflict of interest may participate in the selection, award, or administration of a contract supported by the Federal award. Criteria or specific requirement (continued): When a non-Federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the non-Federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. This verification may be accomplished by (1) checking the System for Award Management (SAM) Exclusions maintained by the General Services Administration (GSA) and available at SAM.gov | Home (click on Search Record, then click on Advanced Search-Exclusions) (Note: The OMB guidance at 2 CFR part 180 and agency implementing regulations still refer to the SAM Exclusions as the Excluded Parties List System (EPLS)), (2) collecting a certification from the entity, or (3) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that entity (2 CFR section 180.300). Condition: The City has established a simplified acquisition threshold for public construction but not for "nonpublic works items". The current policy only requires three or more quotes for all other purchases other than the public construction purchases but with no established threshold. The City entered into procurement transactions that exceeded the covered transaction threshold and did not maintain documentation of a search for suspension and debarment nor did it receive a certification from the entity or include a clause regarding suspension and debarment status in the contract with the entity in accordance with 2 CFR section 180.220. Questioned costs: None Context: The City’s current financial policies lack the necessary requirements related to procurement of items other than construction over the simplified acquisition threshold. Supporting documentation of the search for suspension and debarment was requested for the four procurement transactions that exceeded the covered transaction threshold in 2024. No deviations were expected. The city had no support or documentation for suspension and debarment status for these transactions. Cause: The city does not receive frequent federal awards at a level which triggers needing a single audit and was unfamiliar with documentation requirements surrounding procurement procedures. The City did not adopt or modify policies and implement internal controls to address the procurement, conflict of interest and suspension and debarment requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Effect: Contracts for non-construction related procurements and those over the simplified acquisition threshold may not be in compliance with the Uniform Guidance. The potential exists that the city could award contracts to vendors who are suspended or debarred by the federal government resulting in noncompliance. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: City personnel should familiarize themselves with the documentation requirements of the CFR related to procurement. City policies and procedures should be modified to help ensure documentation is maintained on all compliance requirements. The written policies should be expanded to clearly address all five procurement methods allowed under Uniform Guidance. The city should also adopt a written conflict of interest policy. We also recommend that the City review and update policies and procedures to help ensure that all federal grants with covered transactions have vendors reviewed for suspension and debarment status prior to entering into the transaction and that documentation of the status is maintained with the procurement history of each transaction that it is required for. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.

Condition and Context: During our audit of the Public Safety Partnership and Community Policing Grant (CFDA 16.710), we were unable to obtain a copy of the required SF-425 (Federal Financial Report) submitted by the County. Criteria: Per 2 CFR 200.334, Non-Federal entities other than States, including those operating Federal programs as subrecipients of States, must retain financial records, supporting documents, and reports pertinent to federal awards for a period of three years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report. In addition, 2 CFR 200.327 and 200.328 require recipients to submit required financial reports, including the SF-425, to demonstrate accountability for grant expenditures. Cause: The County does not have adequate recordkeeping procedures in place to ensure that copies of all submitted federal reports, including the SF-425, are retained and available for audit. Effect: The inability to provide the SF-425 limited our ability to verify compliance with federal reporting requirements. Lack of adequate documentation may result in questioned costs, affect the granting agency’s ability to monitor the use of federal funds, and may place the County at risk of administrative findings in future audits. Recommendation: We recommend that the County implement procedures to ensure that copies of all required federal reports are retained in accordance with federal record retention requirements and made available for audit purposes. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and will establish procedures to ensure that all required federal reports are retained and readily available for future monitoring and audits.

FINDING 2024-001 Subject: Water and Waste Disposal Systems for Rural Communities - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Program: Water and Waste Disposal Systems for Rural Communities Assistance Listings Number: 10.760 Federal Award Number or Year (or Other Identifying Number): Interim Financing Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context The City did not have an effective system of internal controls over federal award requirements, including procurement and suspension and debarment. The City failed to properly design and implement internal controls, such as appropriate segregation of duties, to ensure compliance and detect or correct noncompliance in a timely manner. Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000 unless a lower, more restrictive threshold is set by a non-federal entity. As Indiana Code has set a more restrictive threshold of $150,000, informal procurement methods are permitted when the value of the procurement does not exceed $150,000. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds: micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. Procurement - Small Purchases During the audit period, the City had six vendors with purchases under the $150,000 threshold that were considered simplified acquisition procurements and over the $10,000 threshold that was considered micro-purchase procurements. All six vendors were selected for testing, and for five of those vendors, the City could not provide the procurement history or the rationale for the method of procurement, the selection of vendor, or the basis for price. The total dollar amount spent with these five vendors during 2024 was $246,055. Procurement - Simplified Acquisitions During the audit period, the City had three vendors with purchases over the $150,000 threshold that were considered simplified acquisition procurements. All three vendors were selected for testing, and for two of those vendors, the City could not provide the procurement history or the rationale for the method of procurement, the selection of vendor, or the basis for price. The total dollar amount spent with these two vendors during 2024 was $2,654,999. Procurement - Policy Per Uniform Guidance, 2 CFR 200.318(a), a non-federal entity that receives federal funds must have and use documented procurement procedures that conform to applicable federal, state, and local laws and regulations. Additionally, state law, such as Indiana Code 5-22, prescribes specific procedures for purchasing supplies and services based on various dollar thresholds. The City did not provide a purchasing policy for review that included the applicable federal regulation, such as procedures to avoid the acquisition of unnecessary or duplicative items and procedures to ensure that all solicitations incorporate a clear and accurate description of the technical requirements for the material, product, or services to be procured. Additionally, the City did not maintain written standards of conduct covering conflicts of interest and governing actions of its employees engaged in the selection, award, and administration of contracts. Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions, recipients are required to verify that such contracts and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the Excluded Parties List System (ELPS), collecting a certification from that person, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. The City failed to verify that vendors were not suspended or debarred prior to entering into covered transactions exceeding $25,000. Of the eight vendors tested, no documentation was provided to show that a check was performed against the EPLS or through other acceptable verification methods. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance was determined to be a systemic issue throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318 states in part: "(a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. . . . (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. . . ." 2 CFR 200.320(b) states in part: "Formal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal financial assistance awards exceeds the SAT, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require following documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a non-competitive procurement can be used in accordance with § 200.319 or paragraph (c) of this section. The following formal methods of procurement are used for procurement of property or services above the simplified acquisition threshold or a value below the simplified acquisition threshold the non-Federal entity determines to be appropriate: (1) Sealed bids. A procurement method in which bids are publicly solicited and a firm fixed-price contract (lump sum or unit price) is awarded to the responsible bidder whose bid, conforming with all the material terms and conditions of the invitation for bids, is the lowest in price. . . . (2) Proposals. A procurement method in which either a fixed price or cost-reimbursement type contract is awarded. Proposals are generally used when conditions are not appropriate for the use of sealed bids. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the SAM.gov Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause The City's management was not aware of federal compliance requirements related to procurement and suspension and debarment. The City had not established or implemented the necessary internal controls and written policies to ensure purchases and contracts were administered in accordance with federal and state regulations. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the City cannot ensure that the services obtained provided full and open competition or the basis of the price. In addition, the City cannot ensure the vendors paid were eligible to participate in federal programs. Any program funds the City used to pay vendors that have been suspended or debarred would be unallowable, and the funding agency could potentially recover them. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statues, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the City. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the City's management establish a proper system of internal controls to ensure expenditures made from federal awards use the appropriate procurement method and retain the documentation to support the procurement methods used in order to ensure compliance with the terms and conditions of the federal award. We recommended that management of the City establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure contractors and subrecipients, as appropriate, are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded prior to entering into contracts or subawards. We also recommended strengthening its policies and procedures to ensure appropriate supporting documentation for federal programs is retained to be presented for audit. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.

2 CFR 1000.10 gives regulatory effect to the U.S. Department of Treasury for 2 CFR § 200.318 through 200.327 which describe specific procedures non-Federal entities must follow when entering into procurement transactions using Federal funds. 2 CFR § 200.320(b) provides formal procurement methods are required when the value of the procurement transaction under a Federal award exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold of the recipient or subrecipient. Formal procurement methods are competitive and require public notice. 2 CFR § 200.320(b) outlines two formal methods of procurement that are used for procurement transactions above the simplified acquisition threshold, which are (1) sealed bids and (2) competitive proposals. Further, 2 CFR § 200.318(i) indicates the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement transaction. These records must include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Due to inadequate controls over the procurement process, for one out of three (33%) vendors examined during testing of the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, the Village did not obtain sealed bids or competitive proposals before contracting with Arcadis G & M of Ohio to provide engineering services. Expenditures for these services funded with Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds during 2024 totaled $403,969. Failure to obtain proposals from a variety of vendors may result in the Village not utilizing the most qualified vendor as well as further noncompliance with federal requirements. The Village should adopt procedures to help ensure records are maintained to document the history of the procurement, including the rationale for the purchase method, selection of vendors, cost/price analysis (if applicable) and the reason for limiting competition (if applicable).

Failure to Conduct Competitive Procurement Procedures Criteria Per 2 CFR §§ 200.318–200.327, non-federal entities must conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition. Sole source procurement may only be used when one of the circumstances outlined in 2 CFR § 200.320(c) applies and is adequately documented in the procurement file. Condition The Organization procured services from contractors identified in the approved grant budget prior to award. However, no evidence was provided to demonstrate that a competitive procurement process was conducted in accordance with the Uniform Guidance. There was no documentation of a sole source justification or other exception permitting noncompetitive procurement. Cause The Organization did not conduct competitive procurement or maintain a documented sole source justification for 4 out of 7 contracts reviewed. Listing the contractor in the grant budget prior to award does not satisfy federal procurement requirements outlined in the Uniform Guidance. Effect Failure to conduct competitive procurement increases the risk of noncompliance with the Uniform Guidance and the possibility that funds are not used appropriately, potentially resulting in questioned costs. Questioned Costs No questioned costs were identified as a result of our procedures. Context/Sampling Seven procurement transactions were tested under the program. In four instances, the Organization did not follow federal procurement requirements. No evidence of competitive bidding or documented sole source justification was provided for these transactions. Recommendation We recommend that the Organization implement procedures to ensure compliance with the procurement standards in 2 CFR §§ 200.318–200.327 for all federally funded purchases, including those where a contractor is named in the grant budget. For future procurements, the Organization should either conduct a competitive bidding process or document and obtain approval for a sole source procurement as allowed under 2 CFR § 200.320(c). Management’s Corrective Action Planned Management accepts the recommendation and will ensure compliance with the procurement standards in 2 CFR §§ 200.318–200.327 for all federally funded purchases by either conducting a competitive bidding process or documenting and obtaining approval for a sole source procurement as allowed under 2CFR §200.320(c).

Finding: Finding Type: Material Weakness Title and Federal Assistance Listing Number of Federal Program: 21.027 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.320, non-federal entities must conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition. For purchases exceeding the micro-purchase threshold of $10,000, the entity must obtain price or rate quotations from an adequate number of qualified sources, unless the purchase qualifies as a sole-source procurement under 2 CFR 200.320(c). Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires the non-federal entity to establish and maintain effective internal control over compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. Furthermore, 2 CFR 200.318(b) and 200.324 require that written contracts be executed with contractors, including all required Federal provisions to safeguard Federal funds. Condition: We examined 60 transactions during our testing of procurement transactions under the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds. We noted that a competitive bidding process was not used in 42 of 60 transactions tested. In all 42 instances, Historic South did not provide evidence that multiple bids or quotes were solicited. The documentation and explanation provided by Historic South was not deemed to be adequate justification to qualify for the use of sole-source procurement under 2 CFR 200.320(c). Additionally, all 60 procurement transactions tested did not have a fully executed, signed contract with the respective contractors. The award/contracting process and methods used to render and pay services did not meet the expected level of formal contractual agreements in place. Cause: In early 2024, Historic South made revisions to the procurement process in order to maximize efficiency and improve overall project outcomes. These revisions were made based on the challenges of securing bids on all potential projects, the need to expend the awarded dollars in a timely fashion and a verbal agreed-upon understanding with the Ohio Department of Health. The requirement to obtain multiple bids was replaced with a strategic invitation approach based on a preferred vendor pool. The result was that Historic South did not have a procedure in place to ensure that procurement transactions were conducted in compliance with Uniform Guidance. Specifically, the procurement policy lacked provisions to enforce competitive procurement practices for purchases above the micro-purchase threshold. Additionally, the process Historic South used to make awards to contractors did not meet the expected standards required for formal contract execution prior to project initiation or payment. - 29 - Historic South Initiative Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs - continued Year Ended December 31, 2024 Section III – Federal Program Audit Findings and Questioned Costs - continued Effect: Failure to obtain competitive bids or quotes increases the risk of paying higher prices for goods/services, or unfair contracting practices. Additionally, the lack of competitive procurement represents noncompliance with Uniform Guidance, which may lead to questioned costs and potential disallowance by the granting agency. Furthermore, the lack of formally signed contracts increases the risk of misuse of federal funds and an inability to enforce contractual obligations or resolve disputes. While our testing did not identify any instances of misspent or improperly used federal funds, the control deficiencies represent a material weakness in internal control over compliance. Questioned Costs: $1,555,114 These costs are considered questioned due to lack of compliance with Uniform Guidance. The amount represents the total bid/contract amount of the 42 transactions tested, that did not meet the competitive bidding requirements. Recommendation: We recommend that Historic South implement and enforce formal procurement procedures that comply with the requirements of 2 CFR 200.317-200.327. These procedures should include obtaining competitive bids and/or maintaining documentation for any alternative bidding process used and approval requirements. Additionally, Historic South should require that fully executed, signed contracts be obtained prior to the start of work or payment to contractors. Staff responsible for procurement should be trained on federal procurement standards to ensure compliance. Views of Responsible Official and Planned Corrective Action: Prospectively, Historic South will review best practices related to the contract awarding process and formal contracting arrangements for construction work. In addition, Historic South will implement policies of: 1. Requiring the solicitation of multiple bids for all construction work in excess of $10,000 2. Establishing criteria for awarding all construction work 3. Implementing formal contracting processes for all construction work

Finding 2024-001 – Noncompliance with Procurement Standards – Professional Services Federal Program: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (Covid-19), ALN #21.027 Criteria: Uniform Guidance requires non-federal entities to maintain documented procurement procedures that ensure full and open competition (2 CFR §200.318). For procurements within the small purchase threshold, nonfederal entities are required to obtain price or rate quotations from an adequate number of qualified sources (2 CFR §200.320). Professional service contracts are subject to these requirements. Condition: The auditee did not follow established procurement policies and the procurement standards set forth in 2 CFR §200.317–§200.327 when engaging legal counsel. Specifically, the auditee procured legal services with total costs between $10,000 and $250,000 without obtaining and documenting required price or rate quotations or performing a documented evaluation of qualified firms. Cause: The auditee did not document a noncompetitive procurement justification or otherwise comply with the small purchase procurement requirements because it was not aware that professional legal services were subject to standards under Uniform Guidance. Additionally, at the time the legal services were engaged, management did not anticipate that the related expenditures would be subject to a Single Audit. Effect: Failure to follow required procurement procedures increases the risk of noncompliance with federal regulations and may result in questioned costs if the expenditures are determined to be unallowable. Context: The audit finding represents an isolated instance. The amount of the audit finding was $22,672 out of the total of $4,605,256 for the program and was discovered using a valid judgmentally selected sample size. Recommendation: We recommend the auditee strengthen internal controls over procurement by ensuring all professional service contracts within the $10,000 to $250,000 threshold comply with federal procurement standards, including obtaining and documenting price or rate quotations from qualified sources and documenting justification for any noncompetitive procurements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Management agrees with the finding and plans to reinforce procurement requirements, and implement review procedures to ensure compliance with procurement thresholds and documentation requirements prior to contract execution.

Finding 2024-002: 93.591 - U.S. Department of Health and Human Services - Family Violence Prevention and Services/State Domestic Violence Coalitions Procurement and Suspension and Debarment, Non-Compliance Criteria: Per 2 CFR § 200.318(a), non-Federal entities must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal law and the standards identified in this part. Additionally, policies must address standards of conduct, competition, cost analysis, and methods of procurement. Condition: During the review of the Organization’s procurement procedures, it was noted that the Organization does not have an updated, written procurement policy that reflects the requirements outlined in 2 CFR § 200.318 – 200.327. The current policy on file predates the implementation of the Uniform Guidance and does not incorporate key standards such as micro-purchase thresholds, competitive bidding requirements, or conflict of interest provisions. Effect: Without an updated procurement policy that aligns with federal requirements, the Organization is at risk of noncompliant procurement practices. This could lead to unallowable costs being charged to federal awards, and potentially jeopardize future funding. Questioned Costs: None. Cause: The Organization has not reviewed or revised its procurement policy since the adoption of the Uniform Guidance, resulting in outdated internal procedures. _x000C_Recommendation: The Organization should update its procurement policy to fully align with the procurement standards outlined in 2 CFR § 200.318 through § 200.327. Staff responsible for procurement should also be trained on the updated procedures to ensure consistent and compliant practices.

Finding 2024-001: Procurement US Department of the Treasury – COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (ALN 21.027) Condition: During our testing of procurement for ALN 21.027, we noted that the City procured certain goods/services through the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania’s COSTARS cooperative purchasing program. For items selected for testing, totaling $184,512, the City did not conduct its own competitive procurement process. In addition, in accordance with the Uniform Guidance, a purchase price from the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania COSTARS cooperative purchasing program is considered to be only one competitive price proposal and it cannot replace a full procurement process. The City does not have implemented monitoring procedures over its use of COSTARS, including [e.g., periodic review of COSTARS procurement documentation, confirmation that COSTARS contracts were competitively awarded, and verification that applicable federal clauses are incorporated]. Documentation in the procurement files was not sufficient to clearly demonstrate how the underlying COSTARS procurement complied with the Uniform Guidance procurement standards for the specific federal award (e.g., basis for contractor selection, method of procurement relative to 2 CFR 200.320 thresholds, and required federal contract provisions). Criteria: In accordance with Uniform Guidance procurement requirements found in 2 CFR Part 200.318 through 200.327, the City is required to ensure that procurement methods used for purchases are appropriate based on the value of the procurement transaction. Cooperative purchasing arrangements (such as state contracts or COSTARS) are not prohibited by the Uniform Guidance; however, the municipality must assume responsibility for the procurement and document how the cooperative contract satisfies the federal procurement requirements applicable to the award. Cause: Procedures in place to ensure that the proper procurement process is followed were not adequate. The City has chosen to leverage the COSTARS cooperative purchasing program to improve efficiency and obtain favorable pricing. While the City has implemented monitoring over COSTARS (for example, reviewing selected COSTARS contract information and maintaining communication with the state regarding procurement practices), those procedures have not been formalized in the written procurement policy, and the related documentation is not consistently retained in the individual grant procurement files. As a result, the audit file did not contain clear, consistent evidence that the COSTARS contracts used for the tested transactions met all applicable Uniform Guidance procurement requirements. Effect: The City was not in compliance with the procurement requirements of the Uniform Guidance. In addition, without documentation demonstrating clear, consistent evidence that COSTARS contracts used for purchases met all applicable Uniform Guidance procurement requirements, there is an increased risk of noncompliance which could result in unallowable costs being charged to the Federal awards. Repeat finding: Yes, finding 2023-002 Questioned costs known and likely: $184,512 known and $124,662 likely. Recommendation: We recommend that the City establish procedures to ensure that their purchasing policy follows all Uniform Guidance procurement standards, especially regarding cooperating purchasing programs. View of Responsible Officials: Management agrees. See Corrective Action Plan.

ALN 14.251 and ALN 21.027 Finding #2024‐003 Subrecipient Monitoring Repeat Finding: No Condition: The Organization did not perform adequate monitoring of its subrecipient to ensure compliance with federal procurement and suspension/debarment requirements. Specifically: · The subrecipient did not have procurement policies that conform to the Uniform Guidance requirements at 2 CFR 200.317–200.327. · The subrecipient did not perform suspension or debarment verifications for vendors, as required by 2 CFR 200.214. · The Organization, as pass‐through entity, did not identify or address these deficiencies through its monitoring procedures. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), pass‐through entities are required to monitor the activities of subrecipients as necessary to ensure that subawards are used for authorized purposes, in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.317–200.327 establish procurement standards applicable to non‐federal entities, including the requirement to have written procurement procedures that conform to applicable federal law and standards. Under 2 CFR 200.214, non‐federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards to parties that are suspended or debarred. Cause: The Organization’s monitoring procedures did not include a review of subrecipient procurement policies and practices, nor did they require confirmation that the subrecipient was performing suspension/debarment checks. Effect: There is an increased risk that federal funds could be expended on unallowable costs, including purchases from suspended or debarred vendors. Lack of proper procurement policies also creates a risk that procurements may not be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition, as required by federal regulations. Questioned Costs: None at this time. Perspective Information: The condition noted applied to the subrecipient responsible for administering $1,525,133 of the Organization’s federal expenditures under ALN 14.251 and $900,000 of the Organization’s pass‐through funds expenditures under ALN 21.027. This represents 100% of the Organization’s subrecipient expenditures for the program. Accordingly, the lack of subrecipient procurement and debarment compliance is considered systemic to the subrecipient relationship and not an isolated instance. Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization strengthen its subrecipient monitoring procedures to include verification that subrecipients have procurement policies in compliance with Uniform Guidance and are performing suspension and debarment checks prior to entering into vendor agreements. The Organization should provide training and technical assistance to subrecipients to help them implement compliant procurement and debarment procedures. Reporting Views of Responsible Officials: The Organization agrees with the finding. The Organization has partnered with a firm to administer the development of the project and was unaware of its responsibilities to monitor the subrecipient relating to procurement and debarment. The Organization is in process of implementing procedures to ensure the subrecipient complies with the requirements of the Uniform Guidance.

ALN 14.251 and ALN 21.027 Finding #2024‐006 Financial Policies and Procedures Repeat Finding: No Condition: The Organization did not have formalized, written financial policies and procedures that address key Uniform Guidance requirements. Criteria: Under 2 CFR 200.302(b), non‐federal entities must establish and maintain effective financial management systems that provide accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each federal award. Uniform Guidance further requires that entities implement written policies and procedures governing: · Allowable costs (2 CFR 200.302(b)(7) and 200.403–200.405), · Procurement (2 CFR 200.317–200.327), · Cash management (2 CFR 200.305), · Travel costs (2 CFR 200.475), and · Conflict of interest (2 CFR 200.318(c)(1)). Written policies serve as the framework for consistent compliance with federal requirements. Cause: The Organization had not developed or adopted written financial policies, relying instead on informal practices and staff knowledge to manage federal awards. Effect: The absence of formalized financial policies increases the risk of noncompliance with Uniform Guidance, inconsistent application of requirements, and potential misuse of federal funds. The lack of a documented framework also limits accountability and makes it difficult to train new staff or demonstrate compliance to oversight agencies. Questioned Costs: None noted. Perspective Information: This condition applied to the Organization’s overall financial management system and impacted all federal programs administered during the year ended December 31, 2024. As such, the lack of formalized financial policies represents a systemic issue and a material weakness in internal control over compliance. Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization adopt formal, written financial policies and procedures that address all Uniform Guidance requirements applicable to federal awards. These policies should be approved by management and the governing body, disseminated to staff, and reviewed periodically to ensure continued compliance. Reporting Views of Responsible Officials: The Organization agrees with the finding. The Organization will establish formalized accounting policies and procedures that adhere to the requirements of the Uniform Guidance.

Finding #2024‐008 Procurement, Suspension/Debarment Repeat Finding: No Condition: During testing of procurement transactions, it was noted that the Organization did not perform required procurement procedures or suspension/debarment verifications prior to executing contracts funded by federal awards. Specifically, the Organization did not document competitive procurement processes or maintain supporting documentation to demonstrate compliance with Uniform Guidance procurement standards. No evidence was provided that vendors were checked against SAM.gov or otherwise verified to ensure they were not suspended or debarred at the time of award. Criteria: Under 2 CFR 200.317 through 200.327, non‐federal entities must follow procurement standards that promote full and open competition, include written procurement procedures, and maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurements. Additionally, per 2 CFR 200.214, non‐federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards to parties that are suspended or debarred. Entities must verify vendor eligibility by checking the System for Award Management (SAM.gov) or by obtaining a vendor certification prior to award. Cause: The Organization lacked formal procurement policies and internal controls to ensure Uniform Guidance procurement and debarment procedures were followed. Responsibility for compliance was not clearly assigned, and no review process existed to confirm that required verifications were completed. Effect: Failure to follow federal procurement and debarment requirements represents a material weakness in internal control over compliance and increases the risk that: Contracts could be awarded to suspended or debarred vendors; purchases may not reflect fair and open competition; and Federal funds could be expended on unallowable costs. Questioned Costs: None at this time. Perspective Information: This condition applied to all federal procurement transactions tested during the year ended June 30, 2025, totaling approximately $51,520 in expenditures. Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization: · Develop and implement written procurement policies that comply with 2 CFR 200.317–200.327. · Require staff to perform and document SAM.gov checks (or equivalent verification) prior to entering into any federally funded contracts. · Maintain procurement documentation that includes bids, quotes, selection rationale, and evidence of price reasonableness. · Provide training to staff on Uniform Guidance procurement and debarment requirements. · Establish a review and approval process to verify compliance before purchases are finalized. Reporting Views of Responsible Officials: The Organization agrees with the finding. The Organization will establish formalized financial policies that comply with procurement and debarment requirements of the Uniform Guidance and ensure compliance with such policies when procuring vendors.

Criteria: Uniform Guidance 2 CFR Part 200.318 require that AEA have documented procurement procedures for procurement transactions under a Federal award or subaward. Condition: AEA follows the Weather Assistance Program Policies and Procedures Manual which has a procurement and suspension and debarment policy; however, AEA did not formally adopt a written policy that complies with the Office of Management and Budget’s (the “OMB”) requirements for procurement suspension and debarment. Cause: AEA did not formally adopt a written policy that complies with OMB requirements for procurement suspension and debarment. Effect: AEA is not in compliance with 2 CFR Part 200.317–200.327 of the Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs: None reported. Context: Not applicable. Repeat Finding: Not applicable. Recommendation: Although there were no purchases in the audit period meeting the threshold for competitive bidding, we recommend that the AEA formally adopt a written procurement and suspension and debarment policy in accordance with the requirements. View of Responsible Officials: See management’s corrective action plan.

Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Department of Transportation – 20.507 and 20.526 Federal Transit Cluster Grant No(s): LA-2017-025, LA-2018-016, LA-2019-008, LA-2020-010, LA-2020-020, LA-2021-011, LA-2021-023, LA-2021-032, LA-2022-023, LA-2022-024, LA-2023-022, LA-2024-012 Criteria: Title 2 CFR §200.327 requires that non Federal entities include applicable contract provisions described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200 in all contracts and subcontracts funded with Federal awards. These provisions include, as applicable, clauses related to termination for cause and convenience, Equal Employment Opportunity, Davis Bacon Act (when applicable), Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act, Clean Air Act, debarment and suspension, Byrd Anti Lobbying Amendment, and other required federal provisions. Condition: The Parish did not include all required federal contract provisions as prescribed by 2 CFR §200.327 and Appendix II to Part 200 in 2 of 8 contracts selected for testing. Specifically, the contracts tested were missing one or more required federal provisions applicable to the nature and funding of the contracts. Universe/Population: The Parish identified 29 contracts subject to Uniform Guidance procurement requirements under the Federal Transit Cluster. From this population, 8 contracts were selected for testing. Cause: The Parish’s procurement review procedures did not include a sufficient control to ensure that all contracts funded with federal awards include the full set of applicable federal contract provisions required by Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200 prior to execution. Effect: Failure to include required federal contract provisions increases the risk that vendors may not be contractually bound to comply with applicable federal requirements, which could result in noncompliance with Uniform Guidance procurement requirements and potential enforcement actions or repayment of federal funds. Questioned Costs: None determined. Identification of a repeat finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the Parish strengthen procurement controls by implementing a standardized federal contract language checklist or template to ensure that all contracts funded with federal awards include the applicable provisions required by 2 CFR §200.327 and Appendix II to Part 200 prior to contract execution. View of Responsible Officials: Management acknowledges the finding and agrees that strengthening procurement controls is necessary to ensure full compliance with federal requirements. To address this issue, the Parish has implemented a standardized contract for use in federally funded procurements that incorporates all applicable requirements under 2 CFR §200.327 and Appendix II to Part 200. In this specific instance the two contracts noted were state contracts. When state contracts are utilized, the Parish will take the necessary steps to validate that such contracts include all required federal contract provisions prior to utilizing any state contracts. Guidance will also be provided to all procurement personnel involved in contracting to reinforce understanding and consistent application of federal requirements. Management expects these corrective actions to be implemented in the near term and will conduct ongoing monitoring to ensure compliance and effectiveness of the enhanced controls. Interim Finance Director Victor LaRocca, Purchasing Director Renny Simno and Assistant Accounting Director Charles “Joey” Vasquez will ensure that this is enacted immediately and that guidance is provided to procurement personnel by June of 2026.

FINDING 2024-001 Information on the federal program: Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Pass-Through Entity: N/A – Direct Grant Federal Program: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF) Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Noncompliance Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)...." 2 CFR 200.318 states in part: "(a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. . . . (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. . . .” 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: “The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases — (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . . “ 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Condition: The City did not have internal controls in place to ensure compliance with the procurement and suspension and debarment requirements. The City had not designed or implemented adequate policies or procedures to ensure that proper procurement procedures for small purchase and simplified acquisition procurement thresholds were followed. Cause: The City had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirements for covered transactions. Effect: Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, procurement procedures for goods and services were not adhered to and vendors to whom payments equal to or in excess of $25,000 were not verified to be not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. The failure to comply with the grant agreement and the compliance requirement could have resulted in the loss of federal funds to the City. Questioned costs: There are no questioned costs. Context: For one out of three samples selected for the small purchase procurement threshold, three quotes and rationale for selecting the vendor were not documented. Small purchase procurements require three competing quotes and rationale for selection of the vendor. The procurement was for park improvement design services. The City was unaware that professional services are required to follow the federal procurement process. Per grant requirements, all grant funded expenditures require appropriate procurement, regardless of whether it is a good or service. For two out of three samples selected for suspension and debarment testing, the City did not have support that vendors procured under CSLFRF funding were not suspended or debarred. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: Yes, finding 2023-003 in the prior year report. Recommendation: We recommend that the City establish and implement control procedures to ensure compliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. This should include ensuring proper procurement methods are followed, suspension and debarment checks are performed and documented prior to entering into the transaction. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management acknowledges the finding. See management’s corrective action plan attached to this audit report.

FINDING 2024‐002 – Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Instance of Material Noncompliance Assistance Listing Number: 21.029 Federal Program Name: COVID-19 - Coronavirus Capital Projects Fund Award Year: 2024 Criteria: Uniform Guidance requires non-federal entities to establish and follow documented procurement procedures and ensure compliance with suspension and debarment requirements. 2 CFR §200.318(a): Requires entities to have and use documented procurement procedures consistent with federal standards. 2 CFR §200.318(i): Requires maintenance of records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. 2 CFR §200.214: Prohibits contracting with parties that are suspended or debarred, requiring verification. Condition and context: The Cooperative has not developed or implemented formal written procurement policies and procedures that comply with Uniform Guidance requirements. Additionally, the Cooperative has not established procedures to ensure compliance with suspension and debarment requirements. As a result, for a sample of three vendors and six procurement transactions tested, the Cooperative did not document suspension and debarment verification (e.g., SAM.gov) for vendors and contractors procured under the federal award. The absence of documented procedures also indicates that procurement activities are not being performed under a standardized framework aligned with federal requirements. Questioned costs: None. Effect: Due to the lack of formalized procurement processes and controls there is an increased risk of noncompliance with federal procurement standards. Expenditures could be paid to suspended or debarred vendors resulting in disallowed expenditures, and noncompliance with the grant agreement. Cause: This was a new grant for the Cooperative, management did not have a sufficient understanding of the procurement-related control requirements necessary to comply with the grant agreement and Uniform Guidance. As a result, procurement processes were not formally established or aligned with federal requirements. Repeat finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the Cooperative develops and implements written procurement policies and procedures in compliance with 2 CFR §200.318–§200.327, including competitive procurement requirements, cost/price analysis, documentation, and record retention. Establish procedures to ensure compliance with suspension and debarment requirements, including performing SAM.gov verification prior to contract award and retaining documentation of verification in procurement files. Lastly, we recommend implementing monitoring controls to ensure procurement documentation and compliance requirements are consistently met. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Wabash is currently in the process of formalizing its procurement standards and internal controls. While management previously managed contractor selections through established internal practices, management recognizes the requirement for a comprehensive written procurement policy that explicitly outlines selection criteria and mandatory debarment verification procedures. To remediate the identified material weakness, Wabash will implement a formal Procurement Policy and Procedure by June 30, 2026. Contact Person(s): Jason Griffy, Network Operations Manager Justin Gephart, Chief Operating Officer

Finding #2024-001 – Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Department of the Treasury Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (ALN 21.027) Passed Through Payments from the State of New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR § 200.318, non-federal entities must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable State, local, and tribal laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal law and the standards identified in 2 CFR § 200.318 through 200.327. Condition: During our testing of procurement transactions, we noted that the District does not have a formal, written procurement policy that incorporates the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. As a result of the District not having a formally documented procurement policy meeting the requirements of the Uniform Guidance, the District failed to verify whether parties it was entering into covered transactions with were suspended or debarred. Cause: The District’s management failed to develop and adopt a formal written procurement policy that aligns with federal regulations. There was a lack of oversight and necessary training regarding the specific administrative requirements of the Uniform Guidance for federally funded programs. Effect: The absence of a compliant procurement policy and related internal control increases the risk that federal funds could be misappropriated or paid to excluded parties. The deficiency results in non-compliance with federal statutes and may lead to questioned costs by the awarding agency. Questioned Costs: Known questioned costs of $962,807 based on all transactions tested and likely questioned costs of $135,384. Context: Of the District’s charges to the major program during the fiscal year, a sample of 6 transactions totaling $962,807 were tested out of a total population of 22 and total expenditures of $1,098,191. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that District management immediately draft and adopt a comprehensive written procurement policy that adheres to 2 CFR §§ 200.318 through 200.327. This policy should specifically include: • Procedures for verifying and documenting the suspension and debarment status of vendors. • Defined thresholds for micro-purchases, small purchases, and sealed bids • Requirements for conducting and documenting cost or price analyses for all procurements exceeding the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. Views of Responsible Officials: District agrees with the finding and will take the necessary steps to draft and adopt a comprehensive procurement policy which meets the requirements of the Uniform Guidance.

2024-003 - Internal Control Over Compliance, Material Noncompliance - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment - Material weakness Federal program information: Funding Agency U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Program Title Indian Housing Block Grant Federal Assistance Listing Number 14.867 Condition: During testing of five procurement transactions, exceptions were identified in two instances. In one sample, verification of the vendor’s status in SAM.gov was performed after the contract award date, indicating noncompliance with pre-award suspension and debarment requirements. In another sample related to the purchase of a vehicle, the procurement file was missing evidence of comparative bidding. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR §§ 200.318–200.327, non-federal entities must follow documented procurement procedures for federally funded purchases exceeding the micro-purchase threshold. These procedures require full and open competition, appropriate procurement methods based on dollar thresholds, and maintenance of records sufficient to detail the history of procurement, including the method used, selection of contractor, and basis for price. Cause: The Housing Entity did not consistently follow established procurement procedures to ensure adequate competition, proper documentation of the procurement process, and timely verification of vendor eligibility. Effect: The Housing Entity was unable to demonstrate compliance with federal procurement and suspension and debarment requirements due to noncompliance with procurement procedures and untimely vendor verification, constituting a material weakness. Auditor's Recommendation: The Housing Entity should ensure SAM.gov verification is completed before awards, maintain complete procurement documentation, and provide staff training to comply with federal procurement requirements.

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Highway Planning and Construction – 20.205 2024-005 Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Policies Condition: The County does not have written policies and procedures in place for the procurement of contractors per 2 CFR Part 200.318 – 200.327, 23 CFR Part 172, and 23 CFR Sections 635.104 & 635.114. The County does not have written standards of conduct that covers conflicts of interest and governs the performance of its employees engaged in the selection and administration of contracts per 2 CFR Section 200.318(c) and 48 CFR Sections 52.203-13 and 52.303-16. Criteria: Policies and procedures for the procurement of service providers should be documented and maintained to ensure the proper advertisement and selection of contractors and consultants. Policies should give all contractors and consultants (in-State and out-of-State) a fair opportunity to be considered for awards. Policies in place should also document standards to prevent conflicts of interest during the selection process. Cause: The County was not aware they were required to have written procurement policies and procedures. Effect: In the absence of procurement policies and procedures, conflicts of interest may exist, and bids may be inadequately obtained and awarded. Context: In a sample of three out of three highway planning and construction contracts the County followed procurement standards 2 CFR Part 200.318 – 200.327, 23 CFR Part 172, and 23 CFR Sections 635.104 & 635.114 when bidding and selecting contracts. Due to the estimated fee range, geographic location of the projects, and the Quality Based Selection Ranking for engineer services, the County does not believe the selection process would have changed if written policies and procedures for the procurement of contractors was in place. Therefore, there are no questioned costs. Recommendation: The County Board should draft and approve policies and procedures for the procurement of contractors per the Compliance Supplement, Code of Federal Regulations, United States Codes, and Federal Acquisition Regulations to ensure the proper advertisement and selection of contractors and consultants, and to prevent conflicts of interest during the selection of contractors and consultants. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management will draft and approve the recommended procurement policies and procedures and disseminate the information to department heads and County employees during the fall of 2025.

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Highway Planning and Construction – 20.205 2024-005 Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Policies Condition: The County does not have written policies and procedures in place for the procurement of contractors per 2 CFR Part 200.318 – 200.327, 23 CFR Part 172, and 23 CFR Sections 635.104 & 635.114. The County does not have written standards of conduct that covers conflicts of interest and governs the performance of its employees engaged in the selection and administration of contracts per 2 CFR Section 200.318(c) and 48 CFR Sections 52.203-13 and 52.303-16. Criteria: Policies and procedures for the procurement of service providers should be documented and maintained to ensure the proper advertisement and selection of contractors and consultants. Policies should give all contractors and consultants (in-State and out-of-State) a fair opportunity to be considered for awards. Policies in place should also document standards to prevent conflicts of interest during the selection process. Cause: The County was not aware they were required to have written procurement policies and procedures. Effect: In the absence of procurement policies and procedures, conflicts of interest may exist, and bids may be inadequately obtained and awarded. Context: In a sample of three out of three highway planning and construction contracts the County followed procurement standards 2 CFR Part 200.318 – 200.327, 23 CFR Part 172, and 23 CFR Sections 635.104 & 635.114 when bidding and selecting contracts. Due to the estimated fee range, geographic location of the projects, and the Quality Based Selection Ranking for engineer services, the County does not believe the selection process would have changed if written policies and procedures for the procurement of contractors was in place. Therefore, there are no questioned costs. Recommendation: The County Board should draft and approve policies and procedures for the procurement of contractors per the Compliance Supplement, Code of Federal Regulations, United States Codes, and Federal Acquisition Regulations to ensure the proper advertisement and selection of contractors and consultants, and to prevent conflicts of interest during the selection of contractors and consultants. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management will draft and approve the recommended procurement policies and procedures and disseminate the information to department heads and County employees during the fall of 2025.

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Highway Planning and Construction – 20.205 2024-005 Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Policies Condition: The County does not have written policies and procedures in place for the procurement of contractors per 2 CFR Part 200.318 – 200.327, 23 CFR Part 172, and 23 CFR Sections 635.104 & 635.114. The County does not have written standards of conduct that covers conflicts of interest and governs the performance of its employees engaged in the selection and administration of contracts per 2 CFR Section 200.318(c) and 48 CFR Sections 52.203-13 and 52.303-16. Criteria: Policies and procedures for the procurement of service providers should be documented and maintained to ensure the proper advertisement and selection of contractors and consultants. Policies should give all contractors and consultants (in-State and out-of-State) a fair opportunity to be considered for awards. Policies in place should also document standards to prevent conflicts of interest during the selection process. Cause: The County was not aware they were required to have written procurement policies and procedures. Effect: In the absence of procurement policies and procedures, conflicts of interest may exist, and bids may be inadequately obtained and awarded. Context: In a sample of three out of three highway planning and construction contracts the County followed procurement standards 2 CFR Part 200.318 – 200.327, 23 CFR Part 172, and 23 CFR Sections 635.104 & 635.114 when bidding and selecting contracts. Due to the estimated fee range, geographic location of the projects, and the Quality Based Selection Ranking for engineer services, the County does not believe the selection process would have changed if written policies and procedures for the procurement of contractors was in place. Therefore, there are no questioned costs. Recommendation: The County Board should draft and approve policies and procedures for the procurement of contractors per the Compliance Supplement, Code of Federal Regulations, United States Codes, and Federal Acquisition Regulations to ensure the proper advertisement and selection of contractors and consultants, and to prevent conflicts of interest during the selection of contractors and consultants. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management will draft and approve the recommended procurement policies and procedures and disseminate the information to department heads and County employees during the fall of 2025.

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Highway Planning and Construction – 20.205 2024-005 Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Policies Condition: The County does not have written policies and procedures in place for the procurement of contractors per 2 CFR Part 200.318 – 200.327, 23 CFR Part 172, and 23 CFR Sections 635.104 & 635.114. The County does not have written standards of conduct that covers conflicts of interest and governs the performance of its employees engaged in the selection and administration of contracts per 2 CFR Section 200.318(c) and 48 CFR Sections 52.203-13 and 52.303-16. Criteria: Policies and procedures for the procurement of service providers should be documented and maintained to ensure the proper advertisement and selection of contractors and consultants. Policies should give all contractors and consultants (in-State and out-of-State) a fair opportunity to be considered for awards. Policies in place should also document standards to prevent conflicts of interest during the selection process. Cause: The County was not aware they were required to have written procurement policies and procedures. Effect: In the absence of procurement policies and procedures, conflicts of interest may exist, and bids may be inadequately obtained and awarded. Context: In a sample of three out of three highway planning and construction contracts the County followed procurement standards 2 CFR Part 200.318 – 200.327, 23 CFR Part 172, and 23 CFR Sections 635.104 & 635.114 when bidding and selecting contracts. Due to the estimated fee range, geographic location of the projects, and the Quality Based Selection Ranking for engineer services, the County does not believe the selection process would have changed if written policies and procedures for the procurement of contractors was in place. Therefore, there are no questioned costs. Recommendation: The County Board should draft and approve policies and procedures for the procurement of contractors per the Compliance Supplement, Code of Federal Regulations, United States Codes, and Federal Acquisition Regulations to ensure the proper advertisement and selection of contractors and consultants, and to prevent conflicts of interest during the selection of contractors and consultants. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management will draft and approve the recommended procurement policies and procedures and disseminate the information to department heads and County employees during the fall of 2025.

Criteria: 2 CFR Section 200.318 requires that the non-federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with state, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a federal award or subaward. The non-federal entity’s documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standard identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327 and must be adhered to. Condition: During testing of the Organization’s controls on compliance over procurement and suspension and debarment, we identified selected vendors the Organization did not have all the needed documentation around the procurement process and the suspension and debarment check. The Organization also must enhance its current procurement policy. Cause: Controls and processes were not effectively designed to ensure there was all proper documentation around the procurement process and the suspension and debarment check. Effect: The Organization was not fully in compliance with the procurement and suspension and debarment check requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs: None. Identification as a Repeat Finding: N/A. Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization review its current documented procurement policy, and its current processes and controls over procurement and suspension and debarment to ensure all required elements are included and the appropriate level of documentation is retained and available.

All Funding Sources Significant Deficiency Procurement Criteria Condition Cause Effect Recommendation Management's Response An entity must have and use documented procurement policies consistent with Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and standards for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in CFR § 200.317 through 200.327. Management agrees with our recommendation and finding and will work to implement a policy. The entity has continued to reference specific grant manuals and guidelines as its written procurement policy. We recommend management develop and adhere to an internally developed policy for all procurements using Federally sourced funds. The Center maintains specific grant manuals and guidelines as its written policies; however, previous audit identified errors in misapplying grant guidelines among funding sources. A recommendation was made in previous audit to develop a policy that would cover all procurements using Federally sourced funds. Such policy was not developed. Failure to follow appropriate procurement procedures could result in excess procurement costs being disallowed and subject the entity to possible claims.

All Funding Sources Significant Deficiency Procurement Criteria Condition Cause Effect Recommendation Management's Response An entity must have and use documented procurement policies consistent with Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and standards for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in CFR § 200.317 through 200.327. Management agrees with our recommendation and finding and will work to implement a policy. The entity has continued to reference specific grant manuals and guidelines as its written procurement policy. We recommend management develop and adhere to an internally developed policy for all procurements using Federally sourced funds. The Center maintains specific grant manuals and guidelines as its written policies; however, previous audit identified errors in misapplying grant guidelines among funding sources. A recommendation was made in previous audit to develop a policy that would cover all procurements using Federally sourced funds. Such policy was not developed. Failure to follow appropriate procurement procedures could result in excess procurement costs being disallowed and subject the entity to possible claims.

All Funding Sources Significant Deficiency Procurement Criteria Condition Cause Effect Recommendation Management's Response An entity must have and use documented procurement policies consistent with Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and standards for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in CFR § 200.317 through 200.327. Management agrees with our recommendation and finding and will work to implement a policy. The entity has continued to reference specific grant manuals and guidelines as its written procurement policy. We recommend management develop and adhere to an internally developed policy for all procurements using Federally sourced funds. The Center maintains specific grant manuals and guidelines as its written policies; however, previous audit identified errors in misapplying grant guidelines among funding sources. A recommendation was made in previous audit to develop a policy that would cover all procurements using Federally sourced funds. Such policy was not developed. Failure to follow appropriate procurement procedures could result in excess procurement costs being disallowed and subject the entity to possible claims.

All Funding Sources Significant Deficiency Procurement Criteria Condition Cause Effect Recommendation Management's Response An entity must have and use documented procurement policies consistent with Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and standards for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in CFR § 200.317 through 200.327. Management agrees with our recommendation and finding and will work to implement a policy. The entity has continued to reference specific grant manuals and guidelines as its written procurement policy. We recommend management develop and adhere to an internally developed policy for all procurements using Federally sourced funds. The Center maintains specific grant manuals and guidelines as its written policies; however, previous audit identified errors in misapplying grant guidelines among funding sources. A recommendation was made in previous audit to develop a policy that would cover all procurements using Federally sourced funds. Such policy was not developed. Failure to follow appropriate procurement procedures could result in excess procurement costs being disallowed and subject the entity to possible claims.

All Funding Sources Significant Deficiency Procurement Criteria Condition Cause Effect Recommendation Management's Response An entity must have and use documented procurement policies consistent with Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and standards for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in CFR § 200.317 through 200.327. Management agrees with our recommendation and finding and will work to implement a policy. The entity has continued to reference specific grant manuals and guidelines as its written procurement policy. We recommend management develop and adhere to an internally developed policy for all procurements using Federally sourced funds. The Center maintains specific grant manuals and guidelines as its written policies; however, previous audit identified errors in misapplying grant guidelines among funding sources. A recommendation was made in previous audit to develop a policy that would cover all procurements using Federally sourced funds. Such policy was not developed. Failure to follow appropriate procurement procedures could result in excess procurement costs being disallowed and subject the entity to possible claims.

All Funding Sources Significant Deficiency Procurement Criteria Condition Cause Effect Recommendation Management's Response An entity must have and use documented procurement policies consistent with Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and standards for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in CFR § 200.317 through 200.327. Management agrees with our recommendation and finding and will work to implement a policy. The entity has continued to reference specific grant manuals and guidelines as its written procurement policy. We recommend management develop and adhere to an internally developed policy for all procurements using Federally sourced funds. The Center maintains specific grant manuals and guidelines as its written policies; however, previous audit identified errors in misapplying grant guidelines among funding sources. A recommendation was made in previous audit to develop a policy that would cover all procurements using Federally sourced funds. Such policy was not developed. Failure to follow appropriate procurement procedures could result in excess procurement costs being disallowed and subject the entity to possible claims.

All Funding Sources Significant Deficiency Procurement Criteria Condition Cause Effect Recommendation Management's Response An entity must have and use documented procurement policies consistent with Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and standards for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in CFR § 200.317 through 200.327. Management agrees with our recommendation and finding and will work to implement a policy. The entity has continued to reference specific grant manuals and guidelines as its written procurement policy. We recommend management develop and adhere to an internally developed policy for all procurements using Federally sourced funds. The Center maintains specific grant manuals and guidelines as its written policies; however, previous audit identified errors in misapplying grant guidelines among funding sources. A recommendation was made in previous audit to develop a policy that would cover all procurements using Federally sourced funds. Such policy was not developed. Failure to follow appropriate procurement procedures could result in excess procurement costs being disallowed and subject the entity to possible claims.

All Funding Sources Significant Deficiency Procurement Criteria Condition Cause Effect Recommendation Management's Response An entity must have and use documented procurement policies consistent with Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and standards for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in CFR § 200.317 through 200.327. Management agrees with our recommendation and finding and will work to implement a policy. The entity has continued to reference specific grant manuals and guidelines as its written procurement policy. We recommend management develop and adhere to an internally developed policy for all procurements using Federally sourced funds. The Center maintains specific grant manuals and guidelines as its written policies; however, previous audit identified errors in misapplying grant guidelines among funding sources. A recommendation was made in previous audit to develop a policy that would cover all procurements using Federally sourced funds. Such policy was not developed. Failure to follow appropriate procurement procedures could result in excess procurement costs being disallowed and subject the entity to possible claims.

All Funding Sources Significant Deficiency Procurement Criteria Condition Cause Effect Recommendation Management's Response An entity must have and use documented procurement policies consistent with Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and standards for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in CFR § 200.317 through 200.327. Management agrees with our recommendation and finding and will work to implement a policy. The entity has continued to reference specific grant manuals and guidelines as its written procurement policy. We recommend management develop and adhere to an internally developed policy for all procurements using Federally sourced funds. The Center maintains specific grant manuals and guidelines as its written policies; however, previous audit identified errors in misapplying grant guidelines among funding sources. A recommendation was made in previous audit to develop a policy that would cover all procurements using Federally sourced funds. Such policy was not developed. Failure to follow appropriate procurement procedures could result in excess procurement costs being disallowed and subject the entity to possible claims.

All Funding Sources Significant Deficiency Procurement Criteria Condition Cause Effect Recommendation Management's Response An entity must have and use documented procurement policies consistent with Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and standards for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in CFR § 200.317 through 200.327. Management agrees with our recommendation and finding and will work to implement a policy. The entity has continued to reference specific grant manuals and guidelines as its written procurement policy. We recommend management develop and adhere to an internally developed policy for all procurements using Federally sourced funds. The Center maintains specific grant manuals and guidelines as its written policies; however, previous audit identified errors in misapplying grant guidelines among funding sources. A recommendation was made in previous audit to develop a policy that would cover all procurements using Federally sourced funds. Such policy was not developed. Failure to follow appropriate procurement procedures could result in excess procurement costs being disallowed and subject the entity to possible claims.

All Funding Sources Significant Deficiency Procurement Criteria Condition Cause Effect Recommendation Management's Response An entity must have and use documented procurement policies consistent with Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and standards for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in CFR § 200.317 through 200.327. Management agrees with our recommendation and finding and will work to implement a policy. The entity has continued to reference specific grant manuals and guidelines as its written procurement policy. We recommend management develop and adhere to an internally developed policy for all procurements using Federally sourced funds. The Center maintains specific grant manuals and guidelines as its written policies; however, previous audit identified errors in misapplying grant guidelines among funding sources. A recommendation was made in previous audit to develop a policy that would cover all procurements using Federally sourced funds. Such policy was not developed. Failure to follow appropriate procurement procedures could result in excess procurement costs being disallowed and subject the entity to possible claims.

Federal Agency: Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program Name: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Projects of Regional and National Significance Assistance Listing Number: 93.243 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: 1H79SM087513-01 - 2024 Award Period: September 30, 2023 through September 29, 2027 Type of Finding: • Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: According to 2 CFR 200.318, non-federal entities must have and use documented procurement procedures that reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, and conform to federal law and the standards identified in 2 CFR 200.318 through 2 CFR 200.327. Condition: During our review of the organization's procurement processes, it was noted that the organization does not have a procurement policy that complies with federal requirements. Specifically, the policy does not address key elements such as competition, cost or price analysis, and documentation requirements as outlined in federal regulations. Questioned costs: None Context: Policies exist, but do not meet requirements. There are no requirements to retain documentation related to comparison or analysis prior to purchase or procurement. Cause: The absence of a compliant procurement policy appears to be due to a lack of awareness of the specific federal requirements and the absence of a formal process to review and update organizational policies to ensure compliance. Effect: Without a procurement policy that complies with federal requirements, the organization is at risk of non-compliance with grant conditions, which could lead to questioned costs, potential disallowance of expenditures, and jeopardize future funding opportunities. Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization develop and implement a procurement policy that complies with federal requirements, including provisions for competition, cost or price analysis, and proper documentation. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.

Failure to Follow Procurement Policy Finding 2024-002 Condition: The Authority did not comply with the current procurement policy as procedures were not fully followed and forms required by the Authority’s procurement policy were not completed for the heating ventilation and cooling project, new roof, and electric vehicle charging stations. The following forms required by either 2 CFR 200 and/or the Authority’s own procurement policy were not completed for the current year capital asset purchases: Written Record of Procurement Checklist Form, Method of Procurement Decision Matrix, Advertisement and Solicitation Form, Bid Quotations, Fewer Than 3 Offers Received Evaluation if applicable, Proposal Tabulation, Certification of Compliance with Federal Clauses for the assets less than $25,000, and Responsibility Determination (sam.gov debarred verification). Criteria: The following requirements are documented in 2 CFR 200-Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards. 2 CFR 200.214 Suspension and Debarment Non-Federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. 2 CFR Part 200.318 General Procurement Standards (a) The Non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. (i) the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. 2 CFR 200.320 Methods of Procurement to be Followed (b) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. 2 CFR 200.324 Contract Cost and Price (a) The Non-Federal entity must perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold including contract modifications. The method and degree of analysis is dependent on the facts surrounding the particular procurement situation, but as a starting point, the non-Federal entity must make independent estimates before receiving bids or proposals. Concurrently, the Authority’s did not comply with its own current procurement policy as it did not follow or prepare the required documentation detailed in the following sections. Procurement Requests-The Authority will maintain sufficient records to detail the history of a procurement. Such records shall include method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection (or rejection), and the contract price. The Authority will treat any prospective contractor or sub-contractor listed on a centralized State government debarment and suspension list as nonresponsible and ineligible for contract award. Debarment and Suspension- The Authority will treat any prospective contractor or sub-contractor listed on a centralized State government debarment and suspension list as non-responsible and ineligible for contract awards. To see if a prospective contractor is eligible, we will look on the website www.SAM.gov and when the bid has been received. Methods of Procurement- a. Micro and Emergency Purchases (do not exceed $10,000)-(a) A written determination as to why price is deemed fair and reasonable must be on file with each purchase made under this method of procurement using Micro-Purchase Price Reasonableness Determination Form. (b) Splitting of procurements to avoid the competitive procurement requirements of federal and state statues shall not be condoned. b. Small Purchase Procurement ($10,000 to $250,000)-(a) A minimum of two price or rate quotations shall be obtained from qualified sources; (b) The procurement will be made from the lowest priced qualified bid, if products or goods are equal; (c) MDOT requires for procurements under $25,000.00. Included Procurement Appendix A, B, E, F, G, H, or I and Vehicle Specification certification if applies. (d) MDOT requires for procurements over $25,000.00 solicitations, including specifications and written selection procedures (lowest bids), Include Procurement Appendix A, F, G, H or I and Vehicle Specification certification if applies. Third Party Contracts with applicable clauses and bond documents must be included. Cause: The Authority did not follow its own procurement policy. Effect: The Authority is noncompliant with 2 CFR 200 and its own procurement policy. Directive: We direct the Authority review and update its procurement policy and implement procedures to ensure that the Authority is complying with the federal requirements, required forms are being completed, and documentation is being maintained. Management’s Response--Corrective Action Plan: Contact person is Todd Shurn, Executive Director, 275 East Wall Street, P.O. Box 837, Benton Harbor, Michigan 49023. Telephone (269) 927-2268. The Authority acknowledges the finding and is currently working to correct this.

Failure to Follow Procurement Policy Finding 2024-002 Condition: The Authority did not comply with the current procurement policy as procedures were not fully followed and forms required by the Authority’s procurement policy were not completed for the heating ventilation and cooling project, new roof, and electric vehicle charging stations. The following forms required by either 2 CFR 200 and/or the Authority’s own procurement policy were not completed for the current year capital asset purchases: Written Record of Procurement Checklist Form, Method of Procurement Decision Matrix, Advertisement and Solicitation Form, Bid Quotations, Fewer Than 3 Offers Received Evaluation if applicable, Proposal Tabulation, Certification of Compliance with Federal Clauses for the assets less than $25,000, and Responsibility Determination (sam.gov debarred verification). Criteria: The following requirements are documented in 2 CFR 200-Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards. 2 CFR 200.214 Suspension and Debarment Non-Federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. 2 CFR Part 200.318 General Procurement Standards (a) The Non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. (i) the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. 2 CFR 200.320 Methods of Procurement to be Followed (b) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. 2 CFR 200.324 Contract Cost and Price (a) The Non-Federal entity must perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold including contract modifications. The method and degree of analysis is dependent on the facts surrounding the particular procurement situation, but as a starting point, the non-Federal entity must make independent estimates before receiving bids or proposals. Concurrently, the Authority’s did not comply with its own current procurement policy as it did not follow or prepare the required documentation detailed in the following sections. Procurement Requests-The Authority will maintain sufficient records to detail the history of a procurement. Such records shall include method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection (or rejection), and the contract price. The Authority will treat any prospective contractor or sub-contractor listed on a centralized State government debarment and suspension list as nonresponsible and ineligible for contract award. Debarment and Suspension- The Authority will treat any prospective contractor or sub-contractor listed on a centralized State government debarment and suspension list as non-responsible and ineligible for contract awards. To see if a prospective contractor is eligible, we will look on the website www.SAM.gov and when the bid has been received. Methods of Procurement- a. Micro and Emergency Purchases (do not exceed $10,000)-(a) A written determination as to why price is deemed fair and reasonable must be on file with each purchase made under this method of procurement using Micro-Purchase Price Reasonableness Determination Form. (b) Splitting of procurements to avoid the competitive procurement requirements of federal and state statues shall not be condoned. b. Small Purchase Procurement ($10,000 to $250,000)-(a) A minimum of two price or rate quotations shall be obtained from qualified sources; (b) The procurement will be made from the lowest priced qualified bid, if products or goods are equal; (c) MDOT requires for procurements under $25,000.00. Included Procurement Appendix A, B, E, F, G, H, or I and Vehicle Specification certification if applies. (d) MDOT requires for procurements over $25,000.00 solicitations, including specifications and written selection procedures (lowest bids), Include Procurement Appendix A, F, G, H or I and Vehicle Specification certification if applies. Third Party Contracts with applicable clauses and bond documents must be included. Cause: The Authority did not follow its own procurement policy. Effect: The Authority is noncompliant with 2 CFR 200 and its own procurement policy. Directive: We direct the Authority review and update its procurement policy and implement procedures to ensure that the Authority is complying with the federal requirements, required forms are being completed, and documentation is being maintained. Management’s Response--Corrective Action Plan: Contact person is Todd Shurn, Executive Director, 275 East Wall Street, P.O. Box 837, Benton Harbor, Michigan 49023. Telephone (269) 927-2268. The Authority acknowledges the finding and is currently working to correct this.

Failure to Follow Procurement Policy Finding 2024-002 Condition: The Authority did not comply with the current procurement policy as procedures were not fully followed and forms required by the Authority’s procurement policy were not completed for the heating ventilation and cooling project, new roof, and electric vehicle charging stations. The following forms required by either 2 CFR 200 and/or the Authority’s own procurement policy were not completed for the current year capital asset purchases: Written Record of Procurement Checklist Form, Method of Procurement Decision Matrix, Advertisement and Solicitation Form, Bid Quotations, Fewer Than 3 Offers Received Evaluation if applicable, Proposal Tabulation, Certification of Compliance with Federal Clauses for the assets less than $25,000, and Responsibility Determination (sam.gov debarred verification). Criteria: The following requirements are documented in 2 CFR 200-Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards. 2 CFR 200.214 Suspension and Debarment Non-Federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. 2 CFR Part 200.318 General Procurement Standards (a) The Non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. (i) the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. 2 CFR 200.320 Methods of Procurement to be Followed (b) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. 2 CFR 200.324 Contract Cost and Price (a) The Non-Federal entity must perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold including contract modifications. The method and degree of analysis is dependent on the facts surrounding the particular procurement situation, but as a starting point, the non-Federal entity must make independent estimates before receiving bids or proposals. Concurrently, the Authority’s did not comply with its own current procurement policy as it did not follow or prepare the required documentation detailed in the following sections. Procurement Requests-The Authority will maintain sufficient records to detail the history of a procurement. Such records shall include method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection (or rejection), and the contract price. The Authority will treat any prospective contractor or sub-contractor listed on a centralized State government debarment and suspension list as nonresponsible and ineligible for contract award. Debarment and Suspension- The Authority will treat any prospective contractor or sub-contractor listed on a centralized State government debarment and suspension list as non-responsible and ineligible for contract awards. To see if a prospective contractor is eligible, we will look on the website www.SAM.gov and when the bid has been received. Methods of Procurement- a. Micro and Emergency Purchases (do not exceed $10,000)-(a) A written determination as to why price is deemed fair and reasonable must be on file with each purchase made under this method of procurement using Micro-Purchase Price Reasonableness Determination Form. (b) Splitting of procurements to avoid the competitive procurement requirements of federal and state statues shall not be condoned. b. Small Purchase Procurement ($10,000 to $250,000)-(a) A minimum of two price or rate quotations shall be obtained from qualified sources; (b) The procurement will be made from the lowest priced qualified bid, if products or goods are equal; (c) MDOT requires for procurements under $25,000.00. Included Procurement Appendix A, B, E, F, G, H, or I and Vehicle Specification certification if applies. (d) MDOT requires for procurements over $25,000.00 solicitations, including specifications and written selection procedures (lowest bids), Include Procurement Appendix A, F, G, H or I and Vehicle Specification certification if applies. Third Party Contracts with applicable clauses and bond documents must be included. Cause: The Authority did not follow its own procurement policy. Effect: The Authority is noncompliant with 2 CFR 200 and its own procurement policy. Directive: We direct the Authority review and update its procurement policy and implement procedures to ensure that the Authority is complying with the federal requirements, required forms are being completed, and documentation is being maintained. Management’s Response--Corrective Action Plan: Contact person is Todd Shurn, Executive Director, 275 East Wall Street, P.O. Box 837, Benton Harbor, Michigan 49023. Telephone (269) 927-2268. The Authority acknowledges the finding and is currently working to correct this.

Failure to Follow Procurement Policy Finding 2024-002 Condition: The Authority did not comply with the current procurement policy as procedures were not fully followed and forms required by the Authority’s procurement policy were not completed for the heating ventilation and cooling project, new roof, and electric vehicle charging stations. The following forms required by either 2 CFR 200 and/or the Authority’s own procurement policy were not completed for the current year capital asset purchases: Written Record of Procurement Checklist Form, Method of Procurement Decision Matrix, Advertisement and Solicitation Form, Bid Quotations, Fewer Than 3 Offers Received Evaluation if applicable, Proposal Tabulation, Certification of Compliance with Federal Clauses for the assets less than $25,000, and Responsibility Determination (sam.gov debarred verification). Criteria: The following requirements are documented in 2 CFR 200-Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards. 2 CFR 200.214 Suspension and Debarment Non-Federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. 2 CFR Part 200.318 General Procurement Standards (a) The Non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. (i) the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. 2 CFR 200.320 Methods of Procurement to be Followed (b) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. 2 CFR 200.324 Contract Cost and Price (a) The Non-Federal entity must perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold including contract modifications. The method and degree of analysis is dependent on the facts surrounding the particular procurement situation, but as a starting point, the non-Federal entity must make independent estimates before receiving bids or proposals. Concurrently, the Authority’s did not comply with its own current procurement policy as it did not follow or prepare the required documentation detailed in the following sections. Procurement Requests-The Authority will maintain sufficient records to detail the history of a procurement. Such records shall include method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection (or rejection), and the contract price. The Authority will treat any prospective contractor or sub-contractor listed on a centralized State government debarment and suspension list as nonresponsible and ineligible for contract award. Debarment and Suspension- The Authority will treat any prospective contractor or sub-contractor listed on a centralized State government debarment and suspension list as non-responsible and ineligible for contract awards. To see if a prospective contractor is eligible, we will look on the website www.SAM.gov and when the bid has been received. Methods of Procurement- a. Micro and Emergency Purchases (do not exceed $10,000)-(a) A written determination as to why price is deemed fair and reasonable must be on file with each purchase made under this method of procurement using Micro-Purchase Price Reasonableness Determination Form. (b) Splitting of procurements to avoid the competitive procurement requirements of federal and state statues shall not be condoned. b. Small Purchase Procurement ($10,000 to $250,000)-(a) A minimum of two price or rate quotations shall be obtained from qualified sources; (b) The procurement will be made from the lowest priced qualified bid, if products or goods are equal; (c) MDOT requires for procurements under $25,000.00. Included Procurement Appendix A, B, E, F, G, H, or I and Vehicle Specification certification if applies. (d) MDOT requires for procurements over $25,000.00 solicitations, including specifications and written selection procedures (lowest bids), Include Procurement Appendix A, F, G, H or I and Vehicle Specification certification if applies. Third Party Contracts with applicable clauses and bond documents must be included. Cause: The Authority did not follow its own procurement policy. Effect: The Authority is noncompliant with 2 CFR 200 and its own procurement policy. Directive: We direct the Authority review and update its procurement policy and implement procedures to ensure that the Authority is complying with the federal requirements, required forms are being completed, and documentation is being maintained. Management’s Response--Corrective Action Plan: Contact person is Todd Shurn, Executive Director, 275 East Wall Street, P.O. Box 837, Benton Harbor, Michigan 49023. Telephone (269) 927-2268. The Authority acknowledges the finding and is currently working to correct this.

Failure to Follow Procurement Policy Finding 2024-002 Condition: The Authority did not comply with the current procurement policy as procedures were not fully followed and forms required by the Authority’s procurement policy were not completed for the heating ventilation and cooling project, new roof, and electric vehicle charging stations. The following forms required by either 2 CFR 200 and/or the Authority’s own procurement policy were not completed for the current year capital asset purchases: Written Record of Procurement Checklist Form, Method of Procurement Decision Matrix, Advertisement and Solicitation Form, Bid Quotations, Fewer Than 3 Offers Received Evaluation if applicable, Proposal Tabulation, Certification of Compliance with Federal Clauses for the assets less than $25,000, and Responsibility Determination (sam.gov debarred verification). Criteria: The following requirements are documented in 2 CFR 200-Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards. 2 CFR 200.214 Suspension and Debarment Non-Federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. 2 CFR Part 200.318 General Procurement Standards (a) The Non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. (i) the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. 2 CFR 200.320 Methods of Procurement to be Followed (b) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. 2 CFR 200.324 Contract Cost and Price (a) The Non-Federal entity must perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold including contract modifications. The method and degree of analysis is dependent on the facts surrounding the particular procurement situation, but as a starting point, the non-Federal entity must make independent estimates before receiving bids or proposals. Concurrently, the Authority’s did not comply with its own current procurement policy as it did not follow or prepare the required documentation detailed in the following sections. Procurement Requests-The Authority will maintain sufficient records to detail the history of a procurement. Such records shall include method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection (or rejection), and the contract price. The Authority will treat any prospective contractor or sub-contractor listed on a centralized State government debarment and suspension list as nonresponsible and ineligible for contract award. Debarment and Suspension- The Authority will treat any prospective contractor or sub-contractor listed on a centralized State government debarment and suspension list as non-responsible and ineligible for contract awards. To see if a prospective contractor is eligible, we will look on the website www.SAM.gov and when the bid has been received. Methods of Procurement- a. Micro and Emergency Purchases (do not exceed $10,000)-(a) A written determination as to why price is deemed fair and reasonable must be on file with each purchase made under this method of procurement using Micro-Purchase Price Reasonableness Determination Form. (b) Splitting of procurements to avoid the competitive procurement requirements of federal and state statues shall not be condoned. b. Small Purchase Procurement ($10,000 to $250,000)-(a) A minimum of two price or rate quotations shall be obtained from qualified sources; (b) The procurement will be made from the lowest priced qualified bid, if products or goods are equal; (c) MDOT requires for procurements under $25,000.00. Included Procurement Appendix A, B, E, F, G, H, or I and Vehicle Specification certification if applies. (d) MDOT requires for procurements over $25,000.00 solicitations, including specifications and written selection procedures (lowest bids), Include Procurement Appendix A, F, G, H or I and Vehicle Specification certification if applies. Third Party Contracts with applicable clauses and bond documents must be included. Cause: The Authority did not follow its own procurement policy. Effect: The Authority is noncompliant with 2 CFR 200 and its own procurement policy. Directive: We direct the Authority review and update its procurement policy and implement procedures to ensure that the Authority is complying with the federal requirements, required forms are being completed, and documentation is being maintained. Management’s Response--Corrective Action Plan: Contact person is Todd Shurn, Executive Director, 275 East Wall Street, P.O. Box 837, Benton Harbor, Michigan 49023. Telephone (269) 927-2268. The Authority acknowledges the finding and is currently working to correct this.