FINDING 2023-008 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 - Special Education Grants to States Assistance Listings Number: 84.027X Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): 22611-054-ARP Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 29 WABASH CITY SCHOOLS SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Condition and Context Procurement Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000 unless a lower, more restrictive threshold is set by a non-federal entity. As Indiana Code has set a more restrictive threshold of $150,000, informal procurement methods are permitted when the value of the procurement does not exceed $150,000. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds: micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. The School Corporation did not have a procurement policy that complied with the procurement standards. In addition, one purchase, totaling $75,387, was identified that fell within the small purchases threshold. The purchase was selected for testing. The School Corporation did not adequately document the history of the procurement, which would have included an awarded contract. Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with federal award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the SAMs exclusions, collecting a certification from that vendor, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that vendor. Upon inquiry of the School Corporation in order to review the procedures in place for verifying that a vendor with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded, the School Corporation disclosed there were no policies or procedures in place to verify if vendors were suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participation in federal awards. One covered transaction, totaling $75,387, was identified and selected for testing. The School Corporation did not verify the vendor's suspension and debarment status prior to payment. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The Non-Federal entity must: INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 30 WABASH CITY SCHOOLS SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318 states in part: "(a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. . . . (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. . . ." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases — (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 31 WABASH CITY SCHOOLS SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed and implemented by management of the School Corporation, which would include segregation of key functions. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, goods that fell within the small purchase threshold were not properly procured and vendors to whom payments equal to or in excess of $25,000 were not verified to be not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure the history of the procurement is maintained for goods within the small purchase threshold and ensure contractors and subrecipients, as appropriate are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded prior to entering into any contracts or subawards. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2023-008 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 - Special Education Grants to States Assistance Listings Number: 84.027X Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): 22611-054-ARP Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 29 WABASH CITY SCHOOLS SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Condition and Context Procurement Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000 unless a lower, more restrictive threshold is set by a non-federal entity. As Indiana Code has set a more restrictive threshold of $150,000, informal procurement methods are permitted when the value of the procurement does not exceed $150,000. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds: micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. The School Corporation did not have a procurement policy that complied with the procurement standards. In addition, one purchase, totaling $75,387, was identified that fell within the small purchases threshold. The purchase was selected for testing. The School Corporation did not adequately document the history of the procurement, which would have included an awarded contract. Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with federal award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the SAMs exclusions, collecting a certification from that vendor, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that vendor. Upon inquiry of the School Corporation in order to review the procedures in place for verifying that a vendor with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded, the School Corporation disclosed there were no policies or procedures in place to verify if vendors were suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participation in federal awards. One covered transaction, totaling $75,387, was identified and selected for testing. The School Corporation did not verify the vendor's suspension and debarment status prior to payment. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The Non-Federal entity must: INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 30 WABASH CITY SCHOOLS SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318 states in part: "(a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. . . . (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. . . ." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases — (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 31 WABASH CITY SCHOOLS SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed and implemented by management of the School Corporation, which would include segregation of key functions. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, goods that fell within the small purchase threshold were not properly procured and vendors to whom payments equal to or in excess of $25,000 were not verified to be not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure the history of the procurement is maintained for goods within the small purchase threshold and ensure contractors and subrecipients, as appropriate are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded prior to entering into any contracts or subawards. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2023-002 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): SY 2021-22, SY 2022-23 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 18 WASHINGTON COMMUNITY SCHOOLS, INC. SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Condition and Context An effective internal control system, which would include segregation of duties, was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Procurement Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000 unless a lower, more restrictive threshold is set by a nonfederal entity. As Indiana Code has set a more restrictive threshold of $150,000, informal procurement methods are permitted when the value of the procurement does not exceed $150,000. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. A total of four vendors were identified for procurement that fell within the small purchases range. All four vendors were selected for testing. For three of the four vendors tested, the School Corporation could not provide evidence that price or rate quotes were obtained. In addition, the School Corporation did not obtain a contract for two of three vendors as required by Indiana Code for purchases between $50,000 and $150,000. Finally, documentation detailing the history of procurement, which must include the reason for the procurement method used, was not available for audit for these vendors. Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with federal award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the SAMs exclusions, collecting a certification from that vendor, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that vendor. Upon inquiry of the School Corporation in order to review the procedures in place for verifying that a vendor with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded, the School Corporation disclosed procedures included an appendix in the contract that a vendor will sign, stating they are not suspended or debarred or the School Corporation will check the SAMs website to ensure that the vendor is not suspended or debarred. Five covered transactions that equaled or exceeded $25,000 were identified. All five transactions, totaling $3,936,236 were selected for testing. For three of the five vendors, the School Corporation had not performed procedures to ensure the vendors, paid a total of $192,750, were not suspended or debarred, or otherwise excluded or disqualified from participating in federal assistance programs or activities for suspension or debarment. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 19 WASHINGTON COMMUNITY SCHOOLS, INC. SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318 states in part: "(a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. . . . (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. . . ." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use document procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the Simplified Acquisition Threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases - (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 20 WASHINGTON COMMUNITY SCHOOLS, INC. SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed or implemented, which includes segregation of key functions, by management of the School Corporation to ensure that policies and procedures were in place related to procurement and suspension and debarment. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, vendors to whom payments equal to or in excess of $25,000 were not verified to be not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded and for small purchases an adequate number of quotes were not obtained. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions or the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure there are appropriate procurement procedures for goods and services, and that contractors and subrecipients, as appropriate, are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded prior to entering into any contracts or subawards. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2023-002 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): SY 2021-22, SY 2022-23 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 18 WASHINGTON COMMUNITY SCHOOLS, INC. SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Condition and Context An effective internal control system, which would include segregation of duties, was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Procurement Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000 unless a lower, more restrictive threshold is set by a nonfederal entity. As Indiana Code has set a more restrictive threshold of $150,000, informal procurement methods are permitted when the value of the procurement does not exceed $150,000. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. A total of four vendors were identified for procurement that fell within the small purchases range. All four vendors were selected for testing. For three of the four vendors tested, the School Corporation could not provide evidence that price or rate quotes were obtained. In addition, the School Corporation did not obtain a contract for two of three vendors as required by Indiana Code for purchases between $50,000 and $150,000. Finally, documentation detailing the history of procurement, which must include the reason for the procurement method used, was not available for audit for these vendors. Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with federal award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the SAMs exclusions, collecting a certification from that vendor, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that vendor. Upon inquiry of the School Corporation in order to review the procedures in place for verifying that a vendor with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded, the School Corporation disclosed procedures included an appendix in the contract that a vendor will sign, stating they are not suspended or debarred or the School Corporation will check the SAMs website to ensure that the vendor is not suspended or debarred. Five covered transactions that equaled or exceeded $25,000 were identified. All five transactions, totaling $3,936,236 were selected for testing. For three of the five vendors, the School Corporation had not performed procedures to ensure the vendors, paid a total of $192,750, were not suspended or debarred, or otherwise excluded or disqualified from participating in federal assistance programs or activities for suspension or debarment. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 19 WASHINGTON COMMUNITY SCHOOLS, INC. SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318 states in part: "(a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. . . . (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. . . ." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use document procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the Simplified Acquisition Threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases - (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 20 WASHINGTON COMMUNITY SCHOOLS, INC. SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed or implemented, which includes segregation of key functions, by management of the School Corporation to ensure that policies and procedures were in place related to procurement and suspension and debarment. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, vendors to whom payments equal to or in excess of $25,000 were not verified to be not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded and for small purchases an adequate number of quotes were not obtained. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions or the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure there are appropriate procurement procedures for goods and services, and that contractors and subrecipients, as appropriate, are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded prior to entering into any contracts or subawards. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2023-002 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): SY 2021-22, SY 2022-23 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 18 WASHINGTON COMMUNITY SCHOOLS, INC. SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Condition and Context An effective internal control system, which would include segregation of duties, was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Procurement Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000 unless a lower, more restrictive threshold is set by a nonfederal entity. As Indiana Code has set a more restrictive threshold of $150,000, informal procurement methods are permitted when the value of the procurement does not exceed $150,000. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. A total of four vendors were identified for procurement that fell within the small purchases range. All four vendors were selected for testing. For three of the four vendors tested, the School Corporation could not provide evidence that price or rate quotes were obtained. In addition, the School Corporation did not obtain a contract for two of three vendors as required by Indiana Code for purchases between $50,000 and $150,000. Finally, documentation detailing the history of procurement, which must include the reason for the procurement method used, was not available for audit for these vendors. Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with federal award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the SAMs exclusions, collecting a certification from that vendor, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that vendor. Upon inquiry of the School Corporation in order to review the procedures in place for verifying that a vendor with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded, the School Corporation disclosed procedures included an appendix in the contract that a vendor will sign, stating they are not suspended or debarred or the School Corporation will check the SAMs website to ensure that the vendor is not suspended or debarred. Five covered transactions that equaled or exceeded $25,000 were identified. All five transactions, totaling $3,936,236 were selected for testing. For three of the five vendors, the School Corporation had not performed procedures to ensure the vendors, paid a total of $192,750, were not suspended or debarred, or otherwise excluded or disqualified from participating in federal assistance programs or activities for suspension or debarment. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 19 WASHINGTON COMMUNITY SCHOOLS, INC. SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318 states in part: "(a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. . . . (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. . . ." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use document procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the Simplified Acquisition Threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases - (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 20 WASHINGTON COMMUNITY SCHOOLS, INC. SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed or implemented, which includes segregation of key functions, by management of the School Corporation to ensure that policies and procedures were in place related to procurement and suspension and debarment. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, vendors to whom payments equal to or in excess of $25,000 were not verified to be not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded and for small purchases an adequate number of quotes were not obtained. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions or the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure there are appropriate procurement procedures for goods and services, and that contractors and subrecipients, as appropriate, are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded prior to entering into any contracts or subawards. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2023-002 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): SY 2021-22, SY 2022-23 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 18 WASHINGTON COMMUNITY SCHOOLS, INC. SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Condition and Context An effective internal control system, which would include segregation of duties, was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Procurement Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000 unless a lower, more restrictive threshold is set by a nonfederal entity. As Indiana Code has set a more restrictive threshold of $150,000, informal procurement methods are permitted when the value of the procurement does not exceed $150,000. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. A total of four vendors were identified for procurement that fell within the small purchases range. All four vendors were selected for testing. For three of the four vendors tested, the School Corporation could not provide evidence that price or rate quotes were obtained. In addition, the School Corporation did not obtain a contract for two of three vendors as required by Indiana Code for purchases between $50,000 and $150,000. Finally, documentation detailing the history of procurement, which must include the reason for the procurement method used, was not available for audit for these vendors. Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with federal award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the SAMs exclusions, collecting a certification from that vendor, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that vendor. Upon inquiry of the School Corporation in order to review the procedures in place for verifying that a vendor with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded, the School Corporation disclosed procedures included an appendix in the contract that a vendor will sign, stating they are not suspended or debarred or the School Corporation will check the SAMs website to ensure that the vendor is not suspended or debarred. Five covered transactions that equaled or exceeded $25,000 were identified. All five transactions, totaling $3,936,236 were selected for testing. For three of the five vendors, the School Corporation had not performed procedures to ensure the vendors, paid a total of $192,750, were not suspended or debarred, or otherwise excluded or disqualified from participating in federal assistance programs or activities for suspension or debarment. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 19 WASHINGTON COMMUNITY SCHOOLS, INC. SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318 states in part: "(a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. . . . (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. . . ." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use document procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the Simplified Acquisition Threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases - (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 20 WASHINGTON COMMUNITY SCHOOLS, INC. SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed or implemented, which includes segregation of key functions, by management of the School Corporation to ensure that policies and procedures were in place related to procurement and suspension and debarment. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, vendors to whom payments equal to or in excess of $25,000 were not verified to be not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded and for small purchases an adequate number of quotes were not obtained. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions or the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure there are appropriate procurement procedures for goods and services, and that contractors and subrecipients, as appropriate, are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded prior to entering into any contracts or subawards. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2023-002 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): SY 2021-22, SY 2022-23 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 18 WASHINGTON COMMUNITY SCHOOLS, INC. SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Condition and Context An effective internal control system, which would include segregation of duties, was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Procurement Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000 unless a lower, more restrictive threshold is set by a nonfederal entity. As Indiana Code has set a more restrictive threshold of $150,000, informal procurement methods are permitted when the value of the procurement does not exceed $150,000. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. A total of four vendors were identified for procurement that fell within the small purchases range. All four vendors were selected for testing. For three of the four vendors tested, the School Corporation could not provide evidence that price or rate quotes were obtained. In addition, the School Corporation did not obtain a contract for two of three vendors as required by Indiana Code for purchases between $50,000 and $150,000. Finally, documentation detailing the history of procurement, which must include the reason for the procurement method used, was not available for audit for these vendors. Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with federal award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the SAMs exclusions, collecting a certification from that vendor, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that vendor. Upon inquiry of the School Corporation in order to review the procedures in place for verifying that a vendor with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded, the School Corporation disclosed procedures included an appendix in the contract that a vendor will sign, stating they are not suspended or debarred or the School Corporation will check the SAMs website to ensure that the vendor is not suspended or debarred. Five covered transactions that equaled or exceeded $25,000 were identified. All five transactions, totaling $3,936,236 were selected for testing. For three of the five vendors, the School Corporation had not performed procedures to ensure the vendors, paid a total of $192,750, were not suspended or debarred, or otherwise excluded or disqualified from participating in federal assistance programs or activities for suspension or debarment. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 19 WASHINGTON COMMUNITY SCHOOLS, INC. SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318 states in part: "(a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. . . . (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. . . ." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use document procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the Simplified Acquisition Threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases - (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 20 WASHINGTON COMMUNITY SCHOOLS, INC. SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed or implemented, which includes segregation of key functions, by management of the School Corporation to ensure that policies and procedures were in place related to procurement and suspension and debarment. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, vendors to whom payments equal to or in excess of $25,000 were not verified to be not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded and for small purchases an adequate number of quotes were not obtained. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions or the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure there are appropriate procurement procedures for goods and services, and that contractors and subrecipients, as appropriate, are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded prior to entering into any contracts or subawards. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2023-002 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): SY 2021-22, SY 2022-23 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 18 WASHINGTON COMMUNITY SCHOOLS, INC. SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Condition and Context An effective internal control system, which would include segregation of duties, was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Procurement Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000 unless a lower, more restrictive threshold is set by a nonfederal entity. As Indiana Code has set a more restrictive threshold of $150,000, informal procurement methods are permitted when the value of the procurement does not exceed $150,000. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. A total of four vendors were identified for procurement that fell within the small purchases range. All four vendors were selected for testing. For three of the four vendors tested, the School Corporation could not provide evidence that price or rate quotes were obtained. In addition, the School Corporation did not obtain a contract for two of three vendors as required by Indiana Code for purchases between $50,000 and $150,000. Finally, documentation detailing the history of procurement, which must include the reason for the procurement method used, was not available for audit for these vendors. Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with federal award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the SAMs exclusions, collecting a certification from that vendor, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that vendor. Upon inquiry of the School Corporation in order to review the procedures in place for verifying that a vendor with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded, the School Corporation disclosed procedures included an appendix in the contract that a vendor will sign, stating they are not suspended or debarred or the School Corporation will check the SAMs website to ensure that the vendor is not suspended or debarred. Five covered transactions that equaled or exceeded $25,000 were identified. All five transactions, totaling $3,936,236 were selected for testing. For three of the five vendors, the School Corporation had not performed procedures to ensure the vendors, paid a total of $192,750, were not suspended or debarred, or otherwise excluded or disqualified from participating in federal assistance programs or activities for suspension or debarment. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 19 WASHINGTON COMMUNITY SCHOOLS, INC. SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318 states in part: "(a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. . . . (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. . . ." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use document procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the Simplified Acquisition Threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases - (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 20 WASHINGTON COMMUNITY SCHOOLS, INC. SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed or implemented, which includes segregation of key functions, by management of the School Corporation to ensure that policies and procedures were in place related to procurement and suspension and debarment. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, vendors to whom payments equal to or in excess of $25,000 were not verified to be not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded and for small purchases an adequate number of quotes were not obtained. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions or the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure there are appropriate procurement procedures for goods and services, and that contractors and subrecipients, as appropriate, are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded prior to entering into any contracts or subawards. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
Criteria or Specific Requirement (Written Procurement Policies and Procedures): Uniform Guidance requires nonfederal entities to have written policies and procedures regarding procurement under federal awards. Regarding this requirements, 2 CFR § 200.318(a), states: “The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327.” Condition: We requested the District’s procurement policies and procedures. The District provided “POLICY 3170.” This policy includes general provisions in only a few areas: (1) purchases under or equal to $1000; (2) purchases from $1000 to $20,000; (3) purchases over $20,000; (4) provision for local preference; and (5) provision for vehicle purchases. POLICY 3170 does not appear to deal with procurement for federal grants or Uniform Guidance 2 CFR §§ 200.317 through 200.327. The District provided evidence of its intent to adopt new procurement policies and procedures. This is certainly a positive occurrence, but revision to the policies should have, instead, occurred prior to the beginning of the audit year 2022-2023. Cause: It appears that the primary cause of this condition is that the District does not have experience with procurement procedures under Uniform Guidance. Indeed, the District has not been required to have a Single Audit since the fiscal year ending June 30, 2013. Effect: Procurement policies and procedures are the base of internal control for procurement. Without adoption of procurement policies and procedures, non-compliance with procurement requirements is significantly more likely. Questioned costs: No costs are questioned. Perspective: The situation is somewhat offset by the fact that the District hired outside construction managers on both projects who were both experienced in federal grants and sewer projects. Further, despite the lack of appropriate Uniform Guidance procurement policies and procedures, the District did comply with most provisions of 2 CFR §§ 200.317 through 200.327. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We would recommend that the District move forward with drafting procurement, debarment, and further conflict of interest policies and procedures for federal awards. We recommend that the District review 2 CFR §§ 200.317 through 200.327 and make sure that each requirement is dealt with in the District’s new policies and procedures. It is noted that for purchases up to the Micro-purchase amount of $10,000, that competitive price or even rate quotes are not necessary as long as the non-Federal entity considers the price to be reasonable based on research, experience, purchase history or other information and documents it files accordingly. 2 CFR § 200.320(a)(1). Views of responsible officials: Management’s response is reported in “Management’s Response and Corrective Action Plan” included in a separate section at the end of this report.
Criteria or Specific Requirement (Written Procurement Policies and Procedures): Uniform Guidance requires nonfederal entities to have written policies and procedures regarding procurement under federal awards. Regarding this requirements, 2 CFR § 200.318(a), states: “The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327.” Condition: We requested the District’s procurement policies and procedures. The District provided “POLICY 3170.” This policy includes general provisions in only a few areas: (1) purchases under or equal to $1000; (2) purchases from $1000 to $20,000; (3) purchases over $20,000; (4) provision for local preference; and (5) provision for vehicle purchases. POLICY 3170 does not appear to deal with procurement for federal grants or Uniform Guidance 2 CFR §§ 200.317 through 200.327. The District provided evidence of its intent to adopt new procurement policies and procedures. This is certainly a positive occurrence, but revision to the policies should have, instead, occurred prior to the beginning of the audit year 2022-2023. Cause: It appears that the primary cause of this condition is that the District does not have experience with procurement procedures under Uniform Guidance. Indeed, the District has not been required to have a Single Audit since the fiscal year ending June 30, 2013. Effect: Procurement policies and procedures are the base of internal control for procurement. Without adoption of procurement policies and procedures, non-compliance with procurement requirements is significantly more likely. Questioned costs: No costs are questioned. Perspective: The situation is somewhat offset by the fact that the District hired outside construction managers on both projects who were both experienced in federal grants and sewer projects. Further, despite the lack of appropriate Uniform Guidance procurement policies and procedures, the District did comply with most provisions of 2 CFR §§ 200.317 through 200.327. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We would recommend that the District move forward with drafting procurement, debarment, and further conflict of interest policies and procedures for federal awards. We recommend that the District review 2 CFR §§ 200.317 through 200.327 and make sure that each requirement is dealt with in the District’s new policies and procedures. It is noted that for purchases up to the Micro-purchase amount of $10,000, that competitive price or even rate quotes are not necessary as long as the non-Federal entity considers the price to be reasonable based on research, experience, purchase history or other information and documents it files accordingly. 2 CFR § 200.320(a)(1). Views of responsible officials: Management’s response is reported in “Management’s Response and Corrective Action Plan” included in a separate section at the end of this report.
Title V Grant Procurement DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION ALN #: 84.031S Federal Award Identification #: P031S200171 Condition: The University does not have a purchasing or competitive bid policy that follows the federal regulations. The University did not follow its policy and federal procurement requirements when making purchasing and vendor decisions with Title V grant funds. Criteria: 2 CFR 200.318 through 200.327 Questioned Costs: $0 Context: While the expenditures tested as part of the audit met allowable cost and allowable activities requirements, the University did not follow its competitive bid policy nor were minimum federal procurement requirements followed properly. Cause: University personnel were unfamiliar with the federal procurement requirements. Effect: Noncompliance with procurement requirements that could impact future funding opportunities. Identification as repeat finding, if applicable: Not applicable Recommendation: We recommend the University update their policies that follow the federal procurement requirements and the University implement procedures and controls to help prevent deviations from the policies. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Management agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan.
Condition and Context: The four quarterly reports were not filed within the 30 days required by the contract. Criteria, Cause and Effect: According to 2 CFR §200.327, Financial Reporting, information must be collected with the frequency required by the terms and conditions of the Federal award. The contracts require the filing of quarterly reports within 30 days after the quarter-end. The cause is an oversight that quarterly reports were due for the grant. The effect is the late filing of the quarterly reports. Recommendation: We recommend that the School establish a system of monitoring for the filing of all required reporting and that the chief operating officer review the monitoring list on a regular basis consistent with the timing of report filings. Management’s Response: The School’s responsible officials’ views and planned corrective action are in its corrective action plan at the end of the report.
Condition and Context: The four quarterly reports were not filed within the 30 days required by the contract. Criteria, Cause and Effect: According to 2 CFR §200.327, Financial Reporting, information must be collected with the frequency required by the terms and conditions of the Federal award. The contracts require the filing of quarterly reports within 30 days after the quarter-end. The cause is an oversight that quarterly reports were due for the grant. The effect is the late filing of the quarterly reports. Recommendation: We recommend that the School establish a system of monitoring for the filing of all required reporting and that the chief operating officer review the monitoring list on a regular basis consistent with the timing of report filings. Management’s Response: The School’s responsible officials’ views and planned corrective action are in its corrective action plan at the end of the report.
Condition and Context: The four quarterly reports were not filed within the 30 days required by the contract. Criteria, Cause and Effect: According to 2 CFR §200.327, Financial Reporting, information must be collected with the frequency required by the terms and conditions of the Federal award. The contracts require the filing of quarterly reports within 30 days after the quarter-end. The cause is an oversight that quarterly reports were due for the grant. The effect is the late filing of the quarterly reports. Recommendation: We recommend that the School establish a system of monitoring for the filing of all required reporting and that the chief operating officer review the monitoring list on a regular basis consistent with the timing of report filings. Management’s Response: The School’s responsible officials’ views and planned corrective action are in its corrective action plan at the end of the report.
Condition and Context: The four quarterly reports were not filed within the 30 days required by the contract. Criteria, Cause and Effect: According to 2 CFR §200.327, Financial Reporting, information must be collected with the frequency required by the terms and conditions of the Federal award. The contracts require the filing of quarterly reports within 30 days after the quarter-end. The cause is an oversight that quarterly reports were due for the grant. The effect is the late filing of the quarterly reports. Recommendation: We recommend that the School establish a system of monitoring for the filing of all required reporting and that the chief operating officer review the monitoring list on a regular basis consistent with the timing of report filings. Management’s Response: The School’s responsible officials’ views and planned corrective action are in its corrective action plan at the end of the report.
Condition and Context: The four quarterly reports were not filed within the 30 days required by the contract. Criteria, Cause and Effect: According to 2 CFR §200.327, Financial Reporting, information must be collected with the frequency required by the terms and conditions of the Federal award. The contracts require the filing of quarterly reports within 30 days after the quarter-end. The cause is an oversight that quarterly reports were due for the grant. The effect is the late filing of the quarterly reports. Recommendation: We recommend that the School establish a system of monitoring for the filing of all required reporting and that the chief operating officer review the monitoring list on a regular basis consistent with the timing of report filings. Management’s Response: The School’s responsible officials’ views and planned corrective action are in its corrective action plan at the end of the report.
Federal Program Information: COVID – Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (ALN #21.027) Criteria or Specific Requirement (Including Statutory, Regulatory or Other Citation): Procurement: The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of 2 CFR 200.318, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in 2 CFR 200.317 through 200.327. Condition: The College did not have a formal procurement policy in place documenting procedures that conform to the procurement standards in the Uniform Guidance. Cause: Lack of administrative oversight with respect to procurement process. Effect or Potential Effect: The College is not in compliance with procurement standards. Questioned Costs: None. Context: The College did not have a formal procurement policy in place documenting procedures that conform to the procurement standards in the Uniform Guidance. Identification as a Repeat Finding: There was no similar finding identified during the prior year. Recommendation: We recommend the College develop and implement a procurement policy conforming to procurement standards. Views of Responsible Officials:
2023-004 - Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment – Internal Control over Procurement and Verification Against the System for Award Management (“SAM”) (Significant Deficiency) Identification of the Federal Program: Assistance Listing Number: 14.218 Federal Program Name: Community Development Block Grants-Entitlement Grants Cluster Federal Agency: Department of Housing and Urban Development Pass-Through Entity: N/A Federal Award Number(s) and Award Year: B-21-MC-06-0554 Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Assistance Listing Title: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Federal Agency: Department of Treasury Pass-Through Entity: N/A Federal Award Number and Award Year: N/A Criteria or Specific Requirement (Including Statutory, Regulatory, or Other Citation): Suspension and Debarment, Non-Federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include those procurement contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All nonprocurement transactions entered into by a recipient (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. When a non-Federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the non-Federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. This verification may be accomplished by (1) checking the System for Award Management (SAM) Exclusions maintained by the General Services Administration (GSA) and available at https://www.sam.gov/portal/public/SAM/ (Note: The OMB guidance at 2 CFR part 180 and agency implementing regulations still refer to the SAM Exclusions as the Excluded Parties List System (EPLS)), (2) collecting a certification from the entity, or (3) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that entity (2 CFR section 180.300). In accordance with OMB Uniform Guidance, entities under the program, including subrecipients of a state, must follow the procurement standards in 2 CFR sections § 200.318 through § 200.327, including ensuring that the procurement method used for the contracts are appropriate based on the dollar amount and conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320. C.F.R. § 200.319 prescribes that all procurement transactions for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award must be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition consistent with the standards of this section and § 200.320. Further, the non-Federal entity must ensure that all prequalified lists of persons, firms, or products which are used in acquiring goods and services are current and include enough qualified sources to ensure maximum open and free competition. Also, the non-Federal entity must not preclude potential bidders from qualifying during the solicitation period. Condition: Community Development Block Grants-Entitlement Grants Cluster Based on the City’s formal purchasing policy, purchase orders are required to initiate purchases from procured vendors for transactions above $5,000. During our audit, we noted that seven (7) out of forty (40) samples did have purchase order approval made subsequent to invoice approval. The aforementioned circumstance suggests that the method of procurement was not in line with the City’s adopted policy established in line with the Uniform Guidance. Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds We determined that seven (7) out of forty (40) samples did have purchase order approval made subsequent to invoice approval. The aforementioned circumstance suggests that the method of procurement was not in line with the City’s adopted policy established in line with the Uniform Guidance. During our audit, we also noted that there was no supporting document to indicate that the City verified the vendor against the SAM to ensure the vendor was not suspended or debarred from federally-funded programs before the contract was entered into. Cause: The City did not follow its policies and process in place to check and ensure the suspension and debarment review process over vendors that provides goods or services to the City’s programs was conducted prior to enter into contract. The City implemented necessary procedures to address the finding discovered during the audit for the year ended June 30,2022 prospectively, however, due to the timing of the previous audit, the City was not able to address for the year ended June 30, 2023. Effect or Potential Effect: Without verifying whether vendors are suspended or debarred from working on federally-funded projects prior to the contract awarded, the City could be contracting with vendors that are prohibited from working on federally funded projects. Questioned Costs: None. Context: See condition above for context of the finding. Identification as a Repeat Finding, If Applicable: Yes. See prior year finding 2022-004. Recommendation: We recommended the City follow internal control policies and procedures to incorporate the suspension and debarment verification prior to awarding contracts. Views of Responsible Officials: Management concurs the finding.
2023-004 - Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment – Internal Control over Procurement and Verification Against the System for Award Management (“SAM”) (Significant Deficiency) Identification of the Federal Program: Assistance Listing Number: 14.218 Federal Program Name: Community Development Block Grants-Entitlement Grants Cluster Federal Agency: Department of Housing and Urban Development Pass-Through Entity: N/A Federal Award Number(s) and Award Year: B-21-MC-06-0554 Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Assistance Listing Title: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Federal Agency: Department of Treasury Pass-Through Entity: N/A Federal Award Number and Award Year: N/A Criteria or Specific Requirement (Including Statutory, Regulatory, or Other Citation): Suspension and Debarment, Non-Federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include those procurement contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All nonprocurement transactions entered into by a recipient (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. When a non-Federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the non-Federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. This verification may be accomplished by (1) checking the System for Award Management (SAM) Exclusions maintained by the General Services Administration (GSA) and available at https://www.sam.gov/portal/public/SAM/ (Note: The OMB guidance at 2 CFR part 180 and agency implementing regulations still refer to the SAM Exclusions as the Excluded Parties List System (EPLS)), (2) collecting a certification from the entity, or (3) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that entity (2 CFR section 180.300). In accordance with OMB Uniform Guidance, entities under the program, including subrecipients of a state, must follow the procurement standards in 2 CFR sections § 200.318 through § 200.327, including ensuring that the procurement method used for the contracts are appropriate based on the dollar amount and conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320. C.F.R. § 200.319 prescribes that all procurement transactions for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award must be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition consistent with the standards of this section and § 200.320. Further, the non-Federal entity must ensure that all prequalified lists of persons, firms, or products which are used in acquiring goods and services are current and include enough qualified sources to ensure maximum open and free competition. Also, the non-Federal entity must not preclude potential bidders from qualifying during the solicitation period. Condition: Community Development Block Grants-Entitlement Grants Cluster Based on the City’s formal purchasing policy, purchase orders are required to initiate purchases from procured vendors for transactions above $5,000. During our audit, we noted that seven (7) out of forty (40) samples did have purchase order approval made subsequent to invoice approval. The aforementioned circumstance suggests that the method of procurement was not in line with the City’s adopted policy established in line with the Uniform Guidance. Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds We determined that seven (7) out of forty (40) samples did have purchase order approval made subsequent to invoice approval. The aforementioned circumstance suggests that the method of procurement was not in line with the City’s adopted policy established in line with the Uniform Guidance. During our audit, we also noted that there was no supporting document to indicate that the City verified the vendor against the SAM to ensure the vendor was not suspended or debarred from federally-funded programs before the contract was entered into. Cause: The City did not follow its policies and process in place to check and ensure the suspension and debarment review process over vendors that provides goods or services to the City’s programs was conducted prior to enter into contract. The City implemented necessary procedures to address the finding discovered during the audit for the year ended June 30,2022 prospectively, however, due to the timing of the previous audit, the City was not able to address for the year ended June 30, 2023. Effect or Potential Effect: Without verifying whether vendors are suspended or debarred from working on federally-funded projects prior to the contract awarded, the City could be contracting with vendors that are prohibited from working on federally funded projects. Questioned Costs: None. Context: See condition above for context of the finding. Identification as a Repeat Finding, If Applicable: Yes. See prior year finding 2022-004. Recommendation: We recommended the City follow internal control policies and procedures to incorporate the suspension and debarment verification prior to awarding contracts. Views of Responsible Officials: Management concurs the finding.
2023-004 - Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment – Internal Control over Procurement and Verification Against the System for Award Management (“SAM”) (Significant Deficiency) Identification of the Federal Program: Assistance Listing Number: 14.218 Federal Program Name: Community Development Block Grants-Entitlement Grants Cluster Federal Agency: Department of Housing and Urban Development Pass-Through Entity: N/A Federal Award Number(s) and Award Year: B-21-MC-06-0554 Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Assistance Listing Title: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Federal Agency: Department of Treasury Pass-Through Entity: N/A Federal Award Number and Award Year: N/A Criteria or Specific Requirement (Including Statutory, Regulatory, or Other Citation): Suspension and Debarment, Non-Federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include those procurement contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All nonprocurement transactions entered into by a recipient (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. When a non-Federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the non-Federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. This verification may be accomplished by (1) checking the System for Award Management (SAM) Exclusions maintained by the General Services Administration (GSA) and available at https://www.sam.gov/portal/public/SAM/ (Note: The OMB guidance at 2 CFR part 180 and agency implementing regulations still refer to the SAM Exclusions as the Excluded Parties List System (EPLS)), (2) collecting a certification from the entity, or (3) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that entity (2 CFR section 180.300). In accordance with OMB Uniform Guidance, entities under the program, including subrecipients of a state, must follow the procurement standards in 2 CFR sections § 200.318 through § 200.327, including ensuring that the procurement method used for the contracts are appropriate based on the dollar amount and conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320. C.F.R. § 200.319 prescribes that all procurement transactions for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award must be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition consistent with the standards of this section and § 200.320. Further, the non-Federal entity must ensure that all prequalified lists of persons, firms, or products which are used in acquiring goods and services are current and include enough qualified sources to ensure maximum open and free competition. Also, the non-Federal entity must not preclude potential bidders from qualifying during the solicitation period. Condition: Community Development Block Grants-Entitlement Grants Cluster Based on the City’s formal purchasing policy, purchase orders are required to initiate purchases from procured vendors for transactions above $5,000. During our audit, we noted that seven (7) out of forty (40) samples did have purchase order approval made subsequent to invoice approval. The aforementioned circumstance suggests that the method of procurement was not in line with the City’s adopted policy established in line with the Uniform Guidance. Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds We determined that seven (7) out of forty (40) samples did have purchase order approval made subsequent to invoice approval. The aforementioned circumstance suggests that the method of procurement was not in line with the City’s adopted policy established in line with the Uniform Guidance. During our audit, we also noted that there was no supporting document to indicate that the City verified the vendor against the SAM to ensure the vendor was not suspended or debarred from federally-funded programs before the contract was entered into. Cause: The City did not follow its policies and process in place to check and ensure the suspension and debarment review process over vendors that provides goods or services to the City’s programs was conducted prior to enter into contract. The City implemented necessary procedures to address the finding discovered during the audit for the year ended June 30,2022 prospectively, however, due to the timing of the previous audit, the City was not able to address for the year ended June 30, 2023. Effect or Potential Effect: Without verifying whether vendors are suspended or debarred from working on federally-funded projects prior to the contract awarded, the City could be contracting with vendors that are prohibited from working on federally funded projects. Questioned Costs: None. Context: See condition above for context of the finding. Identification as a Repeat Finding, If Applicable: Yes. See prior year finding 2022-004. Recommendation: We recommended the City follow internal control policies and procedures to incorporate the suspension and debarment verification prior to awarding contracts. Views of Responsible Officials: Management concurs the finding.
2023-005 - Reporting – Internal Control and Compliance over Reporting (Material Weakness) Information of the Federal Program(s): Assistance Listing Number: 14.218 Federal Program Name: Community Development Block Grants-Entitlement Grants Cluster Federal Agency: Department of Housing and Urban Development Pass-Through Entity: N/A Federal Award Number(s) and Award Year: B-21-MC-06-0554 B-20-MW-06-0554 Assistance Listing Number: 14.871 Federal Program Name: Housing Voucher Cluster Federal Agency: Department of Housing and Urban Development Pass-Through Entity: N/A Federal Award Number(s) and Award Year: CA120 Criteria or Specific Requirement (Including Statutory, Regulatory, or Other Citation): Community Development Block Grants-Entitlement Grants Cluster The OMB Compliance Supplement requires that reports submitted to the Federal awarding agency include all activity of the reporting period, are supported by underlying accounting information and are presented in accordance with program requirements. Pursuant to the Guidance on Cash on Hand Quarterly Report (replaced the Federal Financial Report, SF-425) and financial reporting requirements in the cooperative agreement provisions, and 2 CFR 200.327: Quarterly reports: Program award recipients must submit Cash on Hand Quarterly Report reports to HUD quarterly, 30 days after the reporting period end date. Each report must cover all expenditures on the cooperative agreement from the start date of the reporting period to the reporting period end date. The following federal fiscal year quarter reporting period will be used for all quarterly reports, are due to HUD 30 days after the period end dates noted below: Reporting Period: Quarter 1: 7/1-9/30 Quarter 2: 10/1-12/31 Quarter 3: 1/1-3/31 Quarter 4: 4/1-6/30 Due Date of Report: October 30 January 30 April 30 July 30 Community Development Block Grants-Entitlement Grants Cluster (Continued) Pursuant to Guidance on Section 15011 of the CARES Act requires that recipients of $150,000 or more of CARES Act funding submit, not later than 10 days after the end of each calendar quarter, a report containing: information regarding the amount of funds received; the amount of funds obligated or expended for each project or activity; a detailed list of all such projects or activities, including a description of the project or activity; and detailed information on any subcontracts or subgrants awarded by the recipient. This report is limited to Community Development Block Grants/Entitlement Grants Cluster - COVID-19 funding and does not include other Community Development Block Grants/Entitlement Grants Cluster funds that may be used to address coronavirus. Grantees and subrecipients have reported data meeting the Section 15011 requirements at usaspending.gov. The Pandemic Response Accountability Committee (PRAC), an independent oversight committee within the Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency, has determined that the data reported in usaspending.gov has fulfilled these reporting requests. (“Section 15011 Report”). Housing Voucher Cluster Per 24 CFR § 5.801(d)(1) - Uniform financial reporting standards, unaudited financial statements will be required 60 days after the Public Housing Authority’s (“PHA”) fiscal year end, and audited financial statements will then be required no later than 9 months after the PHA's fiscal year end, in accordance with the Single Audit Act and 2 CFR part 200, subpart F. The PHA is required to submit the HUD-52681-B, Voucher for Payment of Annual Contributions and Operating Statement form monthly to HUD electronically via the Voucher Management System (VMS). Congress has instructed HUD to use VMS data to determine renewal funding levels. HUD also uses VMS data for other funding, monitoring, and SEMAP- related decisions. Condition: As a result of our test work, we noted the following exceptions: Community Development Block Grants-Entitlement Grants Cluster The City did not submit the required Cash on Hand Quarterly Report in a timely manner. The quarterly Cash on Hand Quarterly Report for the all of the four (4) reporting periods were submitted on February 26, 2024. The City did not submit any of the four (4) quarterly Section 15011 Reports for the year ended June 30, 2023. Housing Voucher Cluster The audited Financial Data Schedule (FDS) for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 was not submitted on or before the March 31, 2023 due date. The unaudited Financial Data Schedule (FDS) for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 was not submitted on or before the August 31, 2023 due date. Housing Voucher Cluster (Continued) We also noted for 2 out of 4 VMS reports tested, there was no evidence of review and approval prior to submission to HUD. A nonstatistical sample of 4 out of 12 VMS reports were selected for test work. Cause: Community Development Block Grants-Entitlement Grants Cluster There was a change in personnel monitoring the compliance requirements for CDBG reporting, and there was no proper task delegation and turnover made upon separation of the previously assigned staff. Hence, the staff assuming the post was unable to meet the due date to ensure filing the Cash on Hand quarterly reports timely, and also was not aware of the Section 15011 CARES reporting. Housing Voucher Cluster Due to the effects of COVID-19 and staff turnover, the program’s procedures did not consistently ensure that the reports were submitted timely in accordance with the timelines in the Uniform Guidance, or properly reviewed and approved prior to submission. The City has implemented internal controls designed to review the VMS report prior to submission, effective starting in March 2023, in an effort to address the finding noted during the audit for the year ended June 30, 2022. Due to the timing of implementation, any VMS report prior to March 2023 do not have any evidence of approval before submission. Effect or Potential Effect: Community Development Block Grants-Entitlement Grants Cluster Delay in filing and not filing the reports resulted in noncompliance with the compliance requirements. Housing Voucher Cluster Failure to submit the audited FDS timely results in noncompliance with the compliance requirements. Failure to review the VMS reports prior to submittal can result in errors going undetected by management. Questioned Costs: None. Context: See condition above for the context of the finding. Identification as a Repeat Finding, If Applicable: Yes. See prior year finding 2022-005. Recommendation: We recommend that the City strengthen their report submission process and procedures to ensure all required reports are properly reviewed and approved and submitted timely. When a report cannot be submitted by the due date, the City should request an extension from the funding agency and maintain a record of the approval. Views of Responsible Officials: Management concurs the finding.
2023-005 - Reporting – Internal Control and Compliance over Reporting (Material Weakness) Information of the Federal Program(s): Assistance Listing Number: 14.218 Federal Program Name: Community Development Block Grants-Entitlement Grants Cluster Federal Agency: Department of Housing and Urban Development Pass-Through Entity: N/A Federal Award Number(s) and Award Year: B-21-MC-06-0554 B-20-MW-06-0554 Assistance Listing Number: 14.871 Federal Program Name: Housing Voucher Cluster Federal Agency: Department of Housing and Urban Development Pass-Through Entity: N/A Federal Award Number(s) and Award Year: CA120 Criteria or Specific Requirement (Including Statutory, Regulatory, or Other Citation): Community Development Block Grants-Entitlement Grants Cluster The OMB Compliance Supplement requires that reports submitted to the Federal awarding agency include all activity of the reporting period, are supported by underlying accounting information and are presented in accordance with program requirements. Pursuant to the Guidance on Cash on Hand Quarterly Report (replaced the Federal Financial Report, SF-425) and financial reporting requirements in the cooperative agreement provisions, and 2 CFR 200.327: Quarterly reports: Program award recipients must submit Cash on Hand Quarterly Report reports to HUD quarterly, 30 days after the reporting period end date. Each report must cover all expenditures on the cooperative agreement from the start date of the reporting period to the reporting period end date. The following federal fiscal year quarter reporting period will be used for all quarterly reports, are due to HUD 30 days after the period end dates noted below: Reporting Period: Quarter 1: 7/1-9/30 Quarter 2: 10/1-12/31 Quarter 3: 1/1-3/31 Quarter 4: 4/1-6/30 Due Date of Report: October 30 January 30 April 30 July 30 Community Development Block Grants-Entitlement Grants Cluster (Continued) Pursuant to Guidance on Section 15011 of the CARES Act requires that recipients of $150,000 or more of CARES Act funding submit, not later than 10 days after the end of each calendar quarter, a report containing: information regarding the amount of funds received; the amount of funds obligated or expended for each project or activity; a detailed list of all such projects or activities, including a description of the project or activity; and detailed information on any subcontracts or subgrants awarded by the recipient. This report is limited to Community Development Block Grants/Entitlement Grants Cluster - COVID-19 funding and does not include other Community Development Block Grants/Entitlement Grants Cluster funds that may be used to address coronavirus. Grantees and subrecipients have reported data meeting the Section 15011 requirements at usaspending.gov. The Pandemic Response Accountability Committee (PRAC), an independent oversight committee within the Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency, has determined that the data reported in usaspending.gov has fulfilled these reporting requests. (“Section 15011 Report”). Housing Voucher Cluster Per 24 CFR § 5.801(d)(1) - Uniform financial reporting standards, unaudited financial statements will be required 60 days after the Public Housing Authority’s (“PHA”) fiscal year end, and audited financial statements will then be required no later than 9 months after the PHA's fiscal year end, in accordance with the Single Audit Act and 2 CFR part 200, subpart F. The PHA is required to submit the HUD-52681-B, Voucher for Payment of Annual Contributions and Operating Statement form monthly to HUD electronically via the Voucher Management System (VMS). Congress has instructed HUD to use VMS data to determine renewal funding levels. HUD also uses VMS data for other funding, monitoring, and SEMAP- related decisions. Condition: As a result of our test work, we noted the following exceptions: Community Development Block Grants-Entitlement Grants Cluster The City did not submit the required Cash on Hand Quarterly Report in a timely manner. The quarterly Cash on Hand Quarterly Report for the all of the four (4) reporting periods were submitted on February 26, 2024. The City did not submit any of the four (4) quarterly Section 15011 Reports for the year ended June 30, 2023. Housing Voucher Cluster The audited Financial Data Schedule (FDS) for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 was not submitted on or before the March 31, 2023 due date. The unaudited Financial Data Schedule (FDS) for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 was not submitted on or before the August 31, 2023 due date. Housing Voucher Cluster (Continued) We also noted for 2 out of 4 VMS reports tested, there was no evidence of review and approval prior to submission to HUD. A nonstatistical sample of 4 out of 12 VMS reports were selected for test work. Cause: Community Development Block Grants-Entitlement Grants Cluster There was a change in personnel monitoring the compliance requirements for CDBG reporting, and there was no proper task delegation and turnover made upon separation of the previously assigned staff. Hence, the staff assuming the post was unable to meet the due date to ensure filing the Cash on Hand quarterly reports timely, and also was not aware of the Section 15011 CARES reporting. Housing Voucher Cluster Due to the effects of COVID-19 and staff turnover, the program’s procedures did not consistently ensure that the reports were submitted timely in accordance with the timelines in the Uniform Guidance, or properly reviewed and approved prior to submission. The City has implemented internal controls designed to review the VMS report prior to submission, effective starting in March 2023, in an effort to address the finding noted during the audit for the year ended June 30, 2022. Due to the timing of implementation, any VMS report prior to March 2023 do not have any evidence of approval before submission. Effect or Potential Effect: Community Development Block Grants-Entitlement Grants Cluster Delay in filing and not filing the reports resulted in noncompliance with the compliance requirements. Housing Voucher Cluster Failure to submit the audited FDS timely results in noncompliance with the compliance requirements. Failure to review the VMS reports prior to submittal can result in errors going undetected by management. Questioned Costs: None. Context: See condition above for the context of the finding. Identification as a Repeat Finding, If Applicable: Yes. See prior year finding 2022-005. Recommendation: We recommend that the City strengthen their report submission process and procedures to ensure all required reports are properly reviewed and approved and submitted timely. When a report cannot be submitted by the due date, the City should request an extension from the funding agency and maintain a record of the approval. Views of Responsible Officials: Management concurs the finding.
2023-005 - Reporting – Internal Control and Compliance over Reporting (Material Weakness) Information of the Federal Program(s): Assistance Listing Number: 14.218 Federal Program Name: Community Development Block Grants-Entitlement Grants Cluster Federal Agency: Department of Housing and Urban Development Pass-Through Entity: N/A Federal Award Number(s) and Award Year: B-21-MC-06-0554 B-20-MW-06-0554 Assistance Listing Number: 14.871 Federal Program Name: Housing Voucher Cluster Federal Agency: Department of Housing and Urban Development Pass-Through Entity: N/A Federal Award Number(s) and Award Year: CA120 Criteria or Specific Requirement (Including Statutory, Regulatory, or Other Citation): Community Development Block Grants-Entitlement Grants Cluster The OMB Compliance Supplement requires that reports submitted to the Federal awarding agency include all activity of the reporting period, are supported by underlying accounting information and are presented in accordance with program requirements. Pursuant to the Guidance on Cash on Hand Quarterly Report (replaced the Federal Financial Report, SF-425) and financial reporting requirements in the cooperative agreement provisions, and 2 CFR 200.327: Quarterly reports: Program award recipients must submit Cash on Hand Quarterly Report reports to HUD quarterly, 30 days after the reporting period end date. Each report must cover all expenditures on the cooperative agreement from the start date of the reporting period to the reporting period end date. The following federal fiscal year quarter reporting period will be used for all quarterly reports, are due to HUD 30 days after the period end dates noted below: Reporting Period: Quarter 1: 7/1-9/30 Quarter 2: 10/1-12/31 Quarter 3: 1/1-3/31 Quarter 4: 4/1-6/30 Due Date of Report: October 30 January 30 April 30 July 30 Community Development Block Grants-Entitlement Grants Cluster (Continued) Pursuant to Guidance on Section 15011 of the CARES Act requires that recipients of $150,000 or more of CARES Act funding submit, not later than 10 days after the end of each calendar quarter, a report containing: information regarding the amount of funds received; the amount of funds obligated or expended for each project or activity; a detailed list of all such projects or activities, including a description of the project or activity; and detailed information on any subcontracts or subgrants awarded by the recipient. This report is limited to Community Development Block Grants/Entitlement Grants Cluster - COVID-19 funding and does not include other Community Development Block Grants/Entitlement Grants Cluster funds that may be used to address coronavirus. Grantees and subrecipients have reported data meeting the Section 15011 requirements at usaspending.gov. The Pandemic Response Accountability Committee (PRAC), an independent oversight committee within the Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency, has determined that the data reported in usaspending.gov has fulfilled these reporting requests. (“Section 15011 Report”). Housing Voucher Cluster Per 24 CFR § 5.801(d)(1) - Uniform financial reporting standards, unaudited financial statements will be required 60 days after the Public Housing Authority’s (“PHA”) fiscal year end, and audited financial statements will then be required no later than 9 months after the PHA's fiscal year end, in accordance with the Single Audit Act and 2 CFR part 200, subpart F. The PHA is required to submit the HUD-52681-B, Voucher for Payment of Annual Contributions and Operating Statement form monthly to HUD electronically via the Voucher Management System (VMS). Congress has instructed HUD to use VMS data to determine renewal funding levels. HUD also uses VMS data for other funding, monitoring, and SEMAP- related decisions. Condition: As a result of our test work, we noted the following exceptions: Community Development Block Grants-Entitlement Grants Cluster The City did not submit the required Cash on Hand Quarterly Report in a timely manner. The quarterly Cash on Hand Quarterly Report for the all of the four (4) reporting periods were submitted on February 26, 2024. The City did not submit any of the four (4) quarterly Section 15011 Reports for the year ended June 30, 2023. Housing Voucher Cluster The audited Financial Data Schedule (FDS) for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 was not submitted on or before the March 31, 2023 due date. The unaudited Financial Data Schedule (FDS) for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 was not submitted on or before the August 31, 2023 due date. Housing Voucher Cluster (Continued) We also noted for 2 out of 4 VMS reports tested, there was no evidence of review and approval prior to submission to HUD. A nonstatistical sample of 4 out of 12 VMS reports were selected for test work. Cause: Community Development Block Grants-Entitlement Grants Cluster There was a change in personnel monitoring the compliance requirements for CDBG reporting, and there was no proper task delegation and turnover made upon separation of the previously assigned staff. Hence, the staff assuming the post was unable to meet the due date to ensure filing the Cash on Hand quarterly reports timely, and also was not aware of the Section 15011 CARES reporting. Housing Voucher Cluster Due to the effects of COVID-19 and staff turnover, the program’s procedures did not consistently ensure that the reports were submitted timely in accordance with the timelines in the Uniform Guidance, or properly reviewed and approved prior to submission. The City has implemented internal controls designed to review the VMS report prior to submission, effective starting in March 2023, in an effort to address the finding noted during the audit for the year ended June 30, 2022. Due to the timing of implementation, any VMS report prior to March 2023 do not have any evidence of approval before submission. Effect or Potential Effect: Community Development Block Grants-Entitlement Grants Cluster Delay in filing and not filing the reports resulted in noncompliance with the compliance requirements. Housing Voucher Cluster Failure to submit the audited FDS timely results in noncompliance with the compliance requirements. Failure to review the VMS reports prior to submittal can result in errors going undetected by management. Questioned Costs: None. Context: See condition above for the context of the finding. Identification as a Repeat Finding, If Applicable: Yes. See prior year finding 2022-005. Recommendation: We recommend that the City strengthen their report submission process and procedures to ensure all required reports are properly reviewed and approved and submitted timely. When a report cannot be submitted by the due date, the City should request an extension from the funding agency and maintain a record of the approval. Views of Responsible Officials: Management concurs the finding.
2023-005 - Reporting – Internal Control and Compliance over Reporting (Material Weakness) Information of the Federal Program(s): Assistance Listing Number: 14.218 Federal Program Name: Community Development Block Grants-Entitlement Grants Cluster Federal Agency: Department of Housing and Urban Development Pass-Through Entity: N/A Federal Award Number(s) and Award Year: B-21-MC-06-0554 B-20-MW-06-0554 Assistance Listing Number: 14.871 Federal Program Name: Housing Voucher Cluster Federal Agency: Department of Housing and Urban Development Pass-Through Entity: N/A Federal Award Number(s) and Award Year: CA120 Criteria or Specific Requirement (Including Statutory, Regulatory, or Other Citation): Community Development Block Grants-Entitlement Grants Cluster The OMB Compliance Supplement requires that reports submitted to the Federal awarding agency include all activity of the reporting period, are supported by underlying accounting information and are presented in accordance with program requirements. Pursuant to the Guidance on Cash on Hand Quarterly Report (replaced the Federal Financial Report, SF-425) and financial reporting requirements in the cooperative agreement provisions, and 2 CFR 200.327: Quarterly reports: Program award recipients must submit Cash on Hand Quarterly Report reports to HUD quarterly, 30 days after the reporting period end date. Each report must cover all expenditures on the cooperative agreement from the start date of the reporting period to the reporting period end date. The following federal fiscal year quarter reporting period will be used for all quarterly reports, are due to HUD 30 days after the period end dates noted below: Reporting Period: Quarter 1: 7/1-9/30 Quarter 2: 10/1-12/31 Quarter 3: 1/1-3/31 Quarter 4: 4/1-6/30 Due Date of Report: October 30 January 30 April 30 July 30 Community Development Block Grants-Entitlement Grants Cluster (Continued) Pursuant to Guidance on Section 15011 of the CARES Act requires that recipients of $150,000 or more of CARES Act funding submit, not later than 10 days after the end of each calendar quarter, a report containing: information regarding the amount of funds received; the amount of funds obligated or expended for each project or activity; a detailed list of all such projects or activities, including a description of the project or activity; and detailed information on any subcontracts or subgrants awarded by the recipient. This report is limited to Community Development Block Grants/Entitlement Grants Cluster - COVID-19 funding and does not include other Community Development Block Grants/Entitlement Grants Cluster funds that may be used to address coronavirus. Grantees and subrecipients have reported data meeting the Section 15011 requirements at usaspending.gov. The Pandemic Response Accountability Committee (PRAC), an independent oversight committee within the Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency, has determined that the data reported in usaspending.gov has fulfilled these reporting requests. (“Section 15011 Report”). Housing Voucher Cluster Per 24 CFR § 5.801(d)(1) - Uniform financial reporting standards, unaudited financial statements will be required 60 days after the Public Housing Authority’s (“PHA”) fiscal year end, and audited financial statements will then be required no later than 9 months after the PHA's fiscal year end, in accordance with the Single Audit Act and 2 CFR part 200, subpart F. The PHA is required to submit the HUD-52681-B, Voucher for Payment of Annual Contributions and Operating Statement form monthly to HUD electronically via the Voucher Management System (VMS). Congress has instructed HUD to use VMS data to determine renewal funding levels. HUD also uses VMS data for other funding, monitoring, and SEMAP- related decisions. Condition: As a result of our test work, we noted the following exceptions: Community Development Block Grants-Entitlement Grants Cluster The City did not submit the required Cash on Hand Quarterly Report in a timely manner. The quarterly Cash on Hand Quarterly Report for the all of the four (4) reporting periods were submitted on February 26, 2024. The City did not submit any of the four (4) quarterly Section 15011 Reports for the year ended June 30, 2023. Housing Voucher Cluster The audited Financial Data Schedule (FDS) for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 was not submitted on or before the March 31, 2023 due date. The unaudited Financial Data Schedule (FDS) for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 was not submitted on or before the August 31, 2023 due date. Housing Voucher Cluster (Continued) We also noted for 2 out of 4 VMS reports tested, there was no evidence of review and approval prior to submission to HUD. A nonstatistical sample of 4 out of 12 VMS reports were selected for test work. Cause: Community Development Block Grants-Entitlement Grants Cluster There was a change in personnel monitoring the compliance requirements for CDBG reporting, and there was no proper task delegation and turnover made upon separation of the previously assigned staff. Hence, the staff assuming the post was unable to meet the due date to ensure filing the Cash on Hand quarterly reports timely, and also was not aware of the Section 15011 CARES reporting. Housing Voucher Cluster Due to the effects of COVID-19 and staff turnover, the program’s procedures did not consistently ensure that the reports were submitted timely in accordance with the timelines in the Uniform Guidance, or properly reviewed and approved prior to submission. The City has implemented internal controls designed to review the VMS report prior to submission, effective starting in March 2023, in an effort to address the finding noted during the audit for the year ended June 30, 2022. Due to the timing of implementation, any VMS report prior to March 2023 do not have any evidence of approval before submission. Effect or Potential Effect: Community Development Block Grants-Entitlement Grants Cluster Delay in filing and not filing the reports resulted in noncompliance with the compliance requirements. Housing Voucher Cluster Failure to submit the audited FDS timely results in noncompliance with the compliance requirements. Failure to review the VMS reports prior to submittal can result in errors going undetected by management. Questioned Costs: None. Context: See condition above for the context of the finding. Identification as a Repeat Finding, If Applicable: Yes. See prior year finding 2022-005. Recommendation: We recommend that the City strengthen their report submission process and procedures to ensure all required reports are properly reviewed and approved and submitted timely. When a report cannot be submitted by the due date, the City should request an extension from the funding agency and maintain a record of the approval. Views of Responsible Officials: Management concurs the finding.
NONCOMPLIANCE WITH PROCUREMENT, SUSPENSION & DEBARMENT REQUIREMENTS, CORONAVIRUS STATE AND LOCAL FISCAL RECOVERY FUNDS; AL No. 21.027; GRANT No. Direct and AM-23-0287 Criteria: Per section 13 of Treasury’s Final Rule FAQs and 2 CFR 200.214, counties must comply with the procurement standards set forth in 2 CFR 200.318, through 2 CFR 200.327, when using their SLFRF award funds to procure goods and services to carry out the objectives of their SLFRF award. In addition, 2 CFR 200.214, prohibits recipients from using SLFRF funds to enter into subawards and contracts with parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs. Condition: The city did not verify that program recipients/participants were not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from participation in the program. Cause: The city does not have procurement policies and procedures in place that allow it to comply with procurement standards outlined in the Uniform Guidance. Effect: Non-compliance with program terms and conditions. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation: Management should develop procedures that will provide reasonable assurance that procurement of goods and services are made in compliance with applicable federal regulations and other procurement requirements specific to a federal award or subaward, and that no subaward, contract, or agreement for purchase of goods or services is made with any suspended or debarred party. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective action: The government agrees with this finding and will adhere to the attached corrective action plan.
NONCOMPLIANCE WITH PROCUREMENT, SUSPENSION & DEBARMENT REQUIREMENTS, CORONAVIRUS STATE AND LOCAL FISCAL RECOVERY FUNDS; AL No. 21.027; GRANT No. Direct and AM-23-0287 Criteria: Per section 13 of Treasury’s Final Rule FAQs and 2 CFR 200.214, counties must comply with the procurement standards set forth in 2 CFR 200.318, through 2 CFR 200.327, when using their SLFRF award funds to procure goods and services to carry out the objectives of their SLFRF award. In addition, 2 CFR 200.214, prohibits recipients from using SLFRF funds to enter into subawards and contracts with parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs. Condition: The city did not verify that program recipients/participants were not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from participation in the program. Cause: The city does not have procurement policies and procedures in place that allow it to comply with procurement standards outlined in the Uniform Guidance. Effect: Non-compliance with program terms and conditions. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation: Management should develop procedures that will provide reasonable assurance that procurement of goods and services are made in compliance with applicable federal regulations and other procurement requirements specific to a federal award or subaward, and that no subaward, contract, or agreement for purchase of goods or services is made with any suspended or debarred party. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective action: The government agrees with this finding and will adhere to the attached corrective action plan.
NONCOMPLIANCE WITH PROCUREMENT, SUSPENSION & DEBARMENT REQUIREMENTS, CORONAVIRUS STATE AND LOCAL FISCAL RECOVERY FUNDS; AL No. 21.027, YEAR ENDED JUNE 30 2023 Criteria: Per section 13 of Treasury’s Final Rule FAQs and 2 CFR 200.214, counties must comply with the procurement standards set forth in 2 CFR 200.318, through 2 CFR 200.327, when using their SLFRF award funds to procure goods and services to carry out the objectives of their SLFRF award. In addition, 2 CFR 200.214, prohibits recipients from using SLFRF funds to enter into subawards and contracts with parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs. Condition 1: The county did not verify that program recipients/participants were not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from participation in the program. Condition 2: The county did not formally bid a water and sewer line extension project at the fairgrounds as required by federal procurement standards established in 2 CFR 300.19. Cause: The county does not have procurement policies and procedures in place that allows it to comply with procurement standards outlined in the Uniform Guidance. Effect: Non-compliance with program terms and conditions. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation: Management should develop procedures that will provide reasonable assurance that procurement of goods and services are made in compliance with applicable federal regulations and other procurement requirements specific to a federal award or subaward, and that no subaward, contract, or agreement for purchase of goods or services is made with any suspended or debarred party. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective action: The government agrees with this finding and will adhere to the attached corrective action plan.
NONCOMPLIANCE WITH PROCUREMENT, SUSPENSION & DEBARMENT REQUIREMENTS, CORONAVIRUS STATE AND LOCAL FISCAL RECOVERY FUNDS; AL No. 21.027, YEAR ENDED JUNE 30 2023 Criteria: Per section 13 of Treasury’s Final Rule FAQs and 2 CFR 200.214, counties must comply with the procurement standards set forth in 2 CFR 200.318, through 2 CFR 200.327, when using their SLFRF award funds to procure goods and services to carry out the objectives of their SLFRF award. In addition, 2 CFR 200.214, prohibits recipients from using SLFRF funds to enter into subawards and contracts with parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs. Condition 1: The county did not verify that program recipients/participants were not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from participation in the program. Condition 2: The county did not formally bid a water and sewer line extension project at the fairgrounds as required by federal procurement standards established in 2 CFR 300.19. Cause: The county does not have procurement policies and procedures in place that allows it to comply with procurement standards outlined in the Uniform Guidance. Effect: Non-compliance with program terms and conditions. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation: Management should develop procedures that will provide reasonable assurance that procurement of goods and services are made in compliance with applicable federal regulations and other procurement requirements specific to a federal award or subaward, and that no subaward, contract, or agreement for purchase of goods or services is made with any suspended or debarred party. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective action: The government agrees with this finding and will adhere to the attached corrective action plan.
NONCOMPLIANCE WITH PROCUREMENT, SUSPENSION & DEBARMENT REQUIREMENTS, CORONAVIRUS STATE AND LOCAL FISCAL RECOVERY FUNDS; AL No. 21.027, YEAR ENDED JUNE 30 2023 Criteria: Per section 13 of Treasury’s Final Rule FAQs and 2 CFR 200.214, counties must comply with the procurement standards set forth in 2 CFR 200.318, through 2 CFR 200.327, when using their SLFRF award funds to procure goods and services to carry out the objectives of their SLFRF award. In addition, 2 CFR 200.214, prohibits recipients from using SLFRF funds to enter into subawards and contracts with parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs. Condition 1: The county did not verify that program recipients/participants were not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from participation in the program. Condition 2: The county did not formally bid a water and sewer line extension project at the fairgrounds as required by federal procurement standards established in 2 CFR 300.19. Cause: The county does not have procurement policies and procedures in place that allows it to comply with procurement standards outlined in the Uniform Guidance. Effect: Non-compliance with program terms and conditions. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation: Management should develop procedures that will provide reasonable assurance that procurement of goods and services are made in compliance with applicable federal regulations and other procurement requirements specific to a federal award or subaward, and that no subaward, contract, or agreement for purchase of goods or services is made with any suspended or debarred party. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective action: The government agrees with this finding and will adhere to the attached corrective action plan.
Finding 2023-002: Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment (Material Weakness) Federal Program: Assistance Listing Number 14.267 Criterion or Specific Requirements: 2 CFR Section 200.318 requires that the non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. 2 CFR Section 200.214 requires that, for covered transactions, a non-Federal entity must verify that entities are not suspended, debarred or otherwise excluded. This verification may be accomplished by checking the System for Award Management (SAM) website maintained by the General Services Administration. Condition: IW has a formal written procurement policy, but it does not conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327, which is the Uniform Guidance. As a result, no procurement files were maintained to document IW's procurement actions. In addition, for all disbursements tested, IW could not provide documentation of their verification, prior to payment, that the vendors were not suspended, debarred or otherwise excluded. Questioned Costs: None. Cause: IW has not updated its written procurement policy to conform to the Uniform Guidance. In addition, IW did not require that evidence of SAM checks be maintained in its vendor files. As a result, IW did not maintain adequate support to provide evidence that appropriate suspension and debarment searches were performed. Despite the lack of documentation, a search was performed after the fact to verify that the vendors or individuals in our sample were not suspended, debarred or otherwise excluded. Therefore, no questioned costs have been reported related to the sample that was tested. Effect or Potential Effect: Without an updated procurement policy that conforms to the Uniform Guidance and related procurement documentation, there is a risk that IW did not perform a proper evaluation of each potential vendor whose costs were charged to Federal programs. In addition, IW could not readily provide evidence that it had assessed whether or not its vendors were suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. As a result, the potential for payments to suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded vendors and individuals exists. Recommendation: IW should revise its procurement policy so that it conforms to the Uniform Guidance. Furthermore, IW should maintain documentation in its files to provide evidence to support that it followed the procurement policy. In addition, IW should establish internal controls to ensure documentation is maintained to evidence that it performed the required suspension and debarment searches on the SAM website.
Finding 2023-002: Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment (Material Weakness) Federal Program: Assistance Listing Number 14.267 Criterion or Specific Requirements: 2 CFR Section 200.318 requires that the non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. 2 CFR Section 200.214 requires that, for covered transactions, a non-Federal entity must verify that entities are not suspended, debarred or otherwise excluded. This verification may be accomplished by checking the System for Award Management (SAM) website maintained by the General Services Administration. Condition: IW has a formal written procurement policy, but it does not conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327, which is the Uniform Guidance. As a result, no procurement files were maintained to document IW's procurement actions. In addition, for all disbursements tested, IW could not provide documentation of their verification, prior to payment, that the vendors were not suspended, debarred or otherwise excluded. Questioned Costs: None. Cause: IW has not updated its written procurement policy to conform to the Uniform Guidance. In addition, IW did not require that evidence of SAM checks be maintained in its vendor files. As a result, IW did not maintain adequate support to provide evidence that appropriate suspension and debarment searches were performed. Despite the lack of documentation, a search was performed after the fact to verify that the vendors or individuals in our sample were not suspended, debarred or otherwise excluded. Therefore, no questioned costs have been reported related to the sample that was tested. Effect or Potential Effect: Without an updated procurement policy that conforms to the Uniform Guidance and related procurement documentation, there is a risk that IW did not perform a proper evaluation of each potential vendor whose costs were charged to Federal programs. In addition, IW could not readily provide evidence that it had assessed whether or not its vendors were suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. As a result, the potential for payments to suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded vendors and individuals exists. Recommendation: IW should revise its procurement policy so that it conforms to the Uniform Guidance. Furthermore, IW should maintain documentation in its files to provide evidence to support that it followed the procurement policy. In addition, IW should establish internal controls to ensure documentation is maintained to evidence that it performed the required suspension and debarment searches on the SAM website.
Criteria: Recipients are responsible for ensuring that any procurement using State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, or payments under procurement contracts using such funds, are consistent with the procurement standards set forth in the Uniform Guidance at 2 CFR 200.317 through 2 CFR 200.327. All contracts made by the non-Federal entity under the Federal award must contain the applicable provisions covering Davis Bacon Act. Condition: The City utilized a vendor from a state contract for public work in excess of $2,000 and did not execute a contract enumerating all required provisions. Cause: The City did not acquire the necessary certified payrolls. Effect: The City is not in compliance with the requirements of the awarding agency. Questioned Costs: None Context/Sampling: All contracts for public works were tested to ensure the necessary required provisions were included and that contractors and subcontractors submitted certified payrolls. The City did not acquire a contract for one project. Prior Year: None Recommendation: We recommend the City enhance internal controls to ensure that all purchases for goods and services under the federal award requiring a formal contract executes one. Client Response: The City recognizes the importance of internal controls and plans to enhance procedures to ensure that all purchases for goods and services under a federal award requiring a formal contract executes one. The City believes it is prudent such awards have a contract to support purchase orders. Covid interruptions with related illnesses, early retirements and hiring difficulties all contributed to the negative impact.
FINDING 2023-001 PROCUREMENT SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY Federal Program: Charter School Programs Assistance Listing Numbers: 84.282A Criteria Per 2 CFR 200.318, “The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §200.317 through 200.327.” Per 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2)(i) Small Purchase Procedures, “The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity.” Condition The School was unable to provide documentation to support that price comparisons were obtained from vendors for costs falling in the category of small purchases (between $10,000 and $249,999). Additionally, the School’s procedures manual did not include procedures for the handling of these transactions. Cause Documentation was not maintained to support that this step in the procurement process was completed. Effect Not documenting these procedures could result in the School completing procurement transactions not in compliance with Federal regulations. Recommendation We recommend the School develop procedures to ensure price comparisons are obtained and documented. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions The School’s Corrective Action Plan is included on page 23.
FINDING 2023-001 PROCUREMENT SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY Federal Program: Charter School Programs Assistance Listing Numbers: 84.282A Criteria Per 2 CFR 200.318, “The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §200.317 through 200.327.” Per 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2)(i) Small Purchase Procedures, “The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity.” Condition The School was unable to provide documentation to support that price comparisons were obtained from vendors for costs falling in the category of small purchases (between $10,000 and $249,999). Additionally, the School’s procedures manual did not include procedures for the handling of these transactions. Cause Documentation was not maintained to support that this step in the procurement process was completed. Effect Not documenting these procedures could result in the School completing procurement transactions not in compliance with Federal regulations. Recommendation We recommend the School develop procedures to ensure price comparisons are obtained and documented. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions The School’s Corrective Action Plan is included on page 23.
2 CFR § 400.1 gives regulatory effect for the U.S. Department of Agriculture to the OMB guidance in 2 CFR § 200. 2 CFR § 200.317 - 200.327 requires entities to use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable State and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-Federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR 200.320(a)(1) and (2). Under the micro-purchase method, the aggregate dollar amount does not exceed $10,000 ($2,000 in the case of acquisition for construction subject to the Wage Rate Requirements (Davis-Bacon Act)). Small purchase procedures are used for purchases that exceed the micro-purchase amount but do not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold ($250,000). Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive quotations if the non-Federal entity considers the price to be reasonable (2 CFR 200.320(a)). If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources (2 CFR 200.320(b)). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-Federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR 200.320(b)(2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR 200.320(c). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR 200.324(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR 200.324(d)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The School District paid more than $250,000 to Valley Wholesale during fiscal year 2023 for food products for the Child Nutrition Cluster. This amount exceeded the simplified acquisition threshold thus the District should follow a formal competitive procurement method described in 2 CFR 200.320(b). However, the School District did not follow a formal procurement method because they chose to use this local vendor (Valley Wholesale) to allow them to get their fresh produce in a timely manner to avoid food waste. The School District did not have the proper internal controls in place to ensure proper bidding procedures were followed. Failure to have the appropriate controls in place may result in vendors being used that are not providing the best possible prices. The School District should follow their established procurement policies and federal guidelines when choosing all vendors for the Child Nutrition Cluster.
2 CFR § 400.1 gives regulatory effect for the U.S. Department of Agriculture to the OMB guidance in 2 CFR § 200. 2 CFR § 200.317 - 200.327 requires entities to use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable State and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-Federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR 200.320(a)(1) and (2). Under the micro-purchase method, the aggregate dollar amount does not exceed $10,000 ($2,000 in the case of acquisition for construction subject to the Wage Rate Requirements (Davis-Bacon Act)). Small purchase procedures are used for purchases that exceed the micro-purchase amount but do not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold ($250,000). Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive quotations if the non-Federal entity considers the price to be reasonable (2 CFR 200.320(a)). If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources (2 CFR 200.320(b)). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-Federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR 200.320(b)(2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR 200.320(c). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR 200.324(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR 200.324(d)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The School District paid more than $250,000 to Valley Wholesale during fiscal year 2023 for food products for the Child Nutrition Cluster. This amount exceeded the simplified acquisition threshold thus the District should follow a formal competitive procurement method described in 2 CFR 200.320(b). However, the School District did not follow a formal procurement method because they chose to use this local vendor (Valley Wholesale) to allow them to get their fresh produce in a timely manner to avoid food waste. The School District did not have the proper internal controls in place to ensure proper bidding procedures were followed. Failure to have the appropriate controls in place may result in vendors being used that are not providing the best possible prices. The School District should follow their established procurement policies and federal guidelines when choosing all vendors for the Child Nutrition Cluster.
2 CFR § 400.1 gives regulatory effect for the U.S. Department of Agriculture to the OMB guidance in 2 CFR § 200. 2 CFR § 200.317 - 200.327 requires entities to use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable State and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-Federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR 200.320(a)(1) and (2). Under the micro-purchase method, the aggregate dollar amount does not exceed $10,000 ($2,000 in the case of acquisition for construction subject to the Wage Rate Requirements (Davis-Bacon Act)). Small purchase procedures are used for purchases that exceed the micro-purchase amount but do not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold ($250,000). Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive quotations if the non-Federal entity considers the price to be reasonable (2 CFR 200.320(a)). If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources (2 CFR 200.320(b)). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-Federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR 200.320(b)(2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR 200.320(c). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR 200.324(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR 200.324(d)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The School District paid more than $250,000 to Valley Wholesale during fiscal year 2023 for food products for the Child Nutrition Cluster. This amount exceeded the simplified acquisition threshold thus the District should follow a formal competitive procurement method described in 2 CFR 200.320(b). However, the School District did not follow a formal procurement method because they chose to use this local vendor (Valley Wholesale) to allow them to get their fresh produce in a timely manner to avoid food waste. The School District did not have the proper internal controls in place to ensure proper bidding procedures were followed. Failure to have the appropriate controls in place may result in vendors being used that are not providing the best possible prices. The School District should follow their established procurement policies and federal guidelines when choosing all vendors for the Child Nutrition Cluster.
Assistance Listing Number(s): 21.027 Name of Federal Program or Cluster: COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Name of Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Name of Pass-through Entity: City of Madison, City of Sun Prairie, Wisconsin Department of Workforce Development Award Period: January 1, 2022 through December 31, 2022; September 22, 2021 through December 31, 2024; June 20, 2022 through June 30, 2025 Criteria or Specific Requirement: 2 CFR section 200.318(a) requires a non-federal entity to have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with state, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.327. 2 CFR section 200.318(c)(1) requires a nonfederal entity to maintain written standards of conduct covering conflicts of interest and governing the actions of its employees engaged in the selection, award and administration of contracts. 2 CFR section 200.318(i) requires a non-federal entity to maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement including, but not limited to, the: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Condition and Context: There are no documented procurement procedures that meet the requirements of 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.327. While there is a conflict-of-interest policy, it does not specifically include standards of conduct covering conflicts of interest for procurement. There are no designed and implemented internal controls documented to ensure compliance with 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.327. For three significant transactions tested there were no documentation of the rationale for the method, documentation to support a required procurement method used, contractor selections or rejections, suspension and debarment, and bases for contract prices. The only support documented are the invoices. Total procurements were $482,904. Cause: The organization began charging procurement transactions in the current year to federal awards. The organization’s staff did not understand how to document the procurement history. Effect or Potential Effect: Questioned costs may be disallowed and required to be repaid. Questioned Costs: $365,501; total of the three significant transactions tested. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: The organization should develop and document procurement procedures that meet state, local, and Uniform Guidance requirements. The conflict-of-interest policy should be updated to include standards of conduct for those involved in procuring and to include organizational conflicts of interest. Internal controls should be designed, implemented, and documented within the procurement procedures to ensure compliance with 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.327. At a minimum, the procurement history including rationale for the method, procurement method support, contract selections and rejections, suspension and debarment, and bases for contract prices should be documented. Views of Responsible Officials: Boys and Girls Club of Dane County, Inc. agrees with the finding and is implementing procurement and conflict-of-interest policies.
Assistance Listing Number(s): 21.027 Name of Federal Program or Cluster: COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Name of Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Name of Pass-through Entity: City of Madison, City of Sun Prairie, Wisconsin Department of Workforce Development Award Period: January 1, 2022 through December 31, 2022; September 22, 2021 through December 31, 2024; June 20, 2022 through June 30, 2025 Criteria or Specific Requirement: 2 CFR section 200.318(a) requires a non-federal entity to have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with state, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.327. 2 CFR section 200.318(c)(1) requires a nonfederal entity to maintain written standards of conduct covering conflicts of interest and governing the actions of its employees engaged in the selection, award and administration of contracts. 2 CFR section 200.318(i) requires a non-federal entity to maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement including, but not limited to, the: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Condition and Context: There are no documented procurement procedures that meet the requirements of 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.327. While there is a conflict-of-interest policy, it does not specifically include standards of conduct covering conflicts of interest for procurement. There are no designed and implemented internal controls documented to ensure compliance with 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.327. For three significant transactions tested there were no documentation of the rationale for the method, documentation to support a required procurement method used, contractor selections or rejections, suspension and debarment, and bases for contract prices. The only support documented are the invoices. Total procurements were $482,904. Cause: The organization began charging procurement transactions in the current year to federal awards. The organization’s staff did not understand how to document the procurement history. Effect or Potential Effect: Questioned costs may be disallowed and required to be repaid. Questioned Costs: $365,501; total of the three significant transactions tested. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: The organization should develop and document procurement procedures that meet state, local, and Uniform Guidance requirements. The conflict-of-interest policy should be updated to include standards of conduct for those involved in procuring and to include organizational conflicts of interest. Internal controls should be designed, implemented, and documented within the procurement procedures to ensure compliance with 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.327. At a minimum, the procurement history including rationale for the method, procurement method support, contract selections and rejections, suspension and debarment, and bases for contract prices should be documented. Views of Responsible Officials: Boys and Girls Club of Dane County, Inc. agrees with the finding and is implementing procurement and conflict-of-interest policies.
Assistance Listing Number(s): 21.027 Name of Federal Program or Cluster: COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Name of Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Name of Pass-through Entity: City of Madison, City of Sun Prairie, Wisconsin Department of Workforce Development Award Period: January 1, 2022 through December 31, 2022; September 22, 2021 through December 31, 2024; June 20, 2022 through June 30, 2025 Criteria or Specific Requirement: 2 CFR section 200.318(a) requires a non-federal entity to have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with state, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.327. 2 CFR section 200.318(c)(1) requires a nonfederal entity to maintain written standards of conduct covering conflicts of interest and governing the actions of its employees engaged in the selection, award and administration of contracts. 2 CFR section 200.318(i) requires a non-federal entity to maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement including, but not limited to, the: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Condition and Context: There are no documented procurement procedures that meet the requirements of 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.327. While there is a conflict-of-interest policy, it does not specifically include standards of conduct covering conflicts of interest for procurement. There are no designed and implemented internal controls documented to ensure compliance with 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.327. For three significant transactions tested there were no documentation of the rationale for the method, documentation to support a required procurement method used, contractor selections or rejections, suspension and debarment, and bases for contract prices. The only support documented are the invoices. Total procurements were $482,904. Cause: The organization began charging procurement transactions in the current year to federal awards. The organization’s staff did not understand how to document the procurement history. Effect or Potential Effect: Questioned costs may be disallowed and required to be repaid. Questioned Costs: $365,501; total of the three significant transactions tested. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: The organization should develop and document procurement procedures that meet state, local, and Uniform Guidance requirements. The conflict-of-interest policy should be updated to include standards of conduct for those involved in procuring and to include organizational conflicts of interest. Internal controls should be designed, implemented, and documented within the procurement procedures to ensure compliance with 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.327. At a minimum, the procurement history including rationale for the method, procurement method support, contract selections and rejections, suspension and debarment, and bases for contract prices should be documented. Views of Responsible Officials: Boys and Girls Club of Dane County, Inc. agrees with the finding and is implementing procurement and conflict-of-interest policies.
2023-005 - Internal Control Over Compliance and Compliance – Reporting (Preparation of the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards) Program- U.S. Department of Energy, National Forum for State and Territorial Chief Executives - HHS OA, Yr 10 and Yr 11, National Forum ALN: 93.528, Award #: 2U98OA09028, Award Year: 09/01/2022 – 09/29/2023 Program- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Strengthening Public Health Systems and Services through National Partnerships to Improve and Protect the Nation’s Health ALN: 93.421, Award #: Various, Award Year: 08/01/2018 – 07/31/2023 Criteria – 2 CFR Section §200.510(b) states in part: “The auditee must also prepare a schedule of expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) for the period covered by the auditee’s financial statements which must include the total Federal awards expended as determined in accordance with CFR Section §200.502 Basis for determining Federal awards expended.” The schedule must provide total Federal awards expended for each individual Federal program. In accordance with §200.302 Financial Management, a non-federal entity’s financial management systems, including records documenting compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award, must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by general and program-specific terms and conditions; and the tracing of funds to a level of expenditures adequate to establish that such funds have been used according to the federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The financial management system of each non-federal entity must provide for the following: (1) Identification, in its accounts, of all federal awards received and expended and the federal programs under which they were received. (2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in §200.327 Financial Reporting and §200.328 Monitoring and Reporting Program Performance. (3) Records that identify adequately the source and application of funds for federally-funded activities. (4) Effective control over, and accountability for, all funds, property, and other assets. Condition – The internal controls established for the review and approval of the SEFA to ensure its completeness and accuracy did not operate as designed. During our testing of management’s preparation of the SEFA, it was determined that some federal award expenditures were excluded from the original SEFA provided by management. Management subsequently corrected the SEFA to reflect the inclusion of the federal expenditures. In addition, several versions were received from management prior to the final SEFA. Questioned Costs – None. Context – This is a condition identified per review of NGA Center’s compliance with specified requirements. Cause – NGA Center only prepares the SEFA once a year in conjunction with the annual audit. This annual process lends itself to less familiarity with the processes necessary to provide a complete SEFA reporting package and turnover in key personnel historically involved in the SEFA process negatively impacted the process. Effect – Failure to present the SEFA correctly can result in incorrect major program selection and incorrect reporting to federal agencies. The finding identified was not of a magnitude to impact BDO’s selection of major programs. Repeat Finding – This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation - We recommend management continue to focus on training for both preparer and reviewer of the SEFA to ensure the documented policies and procedures can be performed as prescribed to comply with Section §200.510(b). This will ensure that the SEFA provides all relevant information as prescribed. Views of Responsible Officials – NGA Center agrees with the finding and recommendations set forth within and has developed a corrective action plan to address the instances of noncompliance identified and lapses in prescribed internal controls.
2023-005 - Internal Control Over Compliance and Compliance – Reporting (Preparation of the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards) Program- U.S. Department of Energy, National Forum for State and Territorial Chief Executives - HHS OA, Yr 10 and Yr 11, National Forum ALN: 93.528, Award #: 2U98OA09028, Award Year: 09/01/2022 – 09/29/2023 Program- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Strengthening Public Health Systems and Services through National Partnerships to Improve and Protect the Nation’s Health ALN: 93.421, Award #: Various, Award Year: 08/01/2018 – 07/31/2023 Criteria – 2 CFR Section §200.510(b) states in part: “The auditee must also prepare a schedule of expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) for the period covered by the auditee’s financial statements which must include the total Federal awards expended as determined in accordance with CFR Section §200.502 Basis for determining Federal awards expended.” The schedule must provide total Federal awards expended for each individual Federal program. In accordance with §200.302 Financial Management, a non-federal entity’s financial management systems, including records documenting compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award, must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by general and program-specific terms and conditions; and the tracing of funds to a level of expenditures adequate to establish that such funds have been used according to the federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The financial management system of each non-federal entity must provide for the following: (1) Identification, in its accounts, of all federal awards received and expended and the federal programs under which they were received. (2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in §200.327 Financial Reporting and §200.328 Monitoring and Reporting Program Performance. (3) Records that identify adequately the source and application of funds for federally-funded activities. (4) Effective control over, and accountability for, all funds, property, and other assets. Condition – The internal controls established for the review and approval of the SEFA to ensure its completeness and accuracy did not operate as designed. During our testing of management’s preparation of the SEFA, it was determined that some federal award expenditures were excluded from the original SEFA provided by management. Management subsequently corrected the SEFA to reflect the inclusion of the federal expenditures. In addition, several versions were received from management prior to the final SEFA. Questioned Costs – None. Context – This is a condition identified per review of NGA Center’s compliance with specified requirements. Cause – NGA Center only prepares the SEFA once a year in conjunction with the annual audit. This annual process lends itself to less familiarity with the processes necessary to provide a complete SEFA reporting package and turnover in key personnel historically involved in the SEFA process negatively impacted the process. Effect – Failure to present the SEFA correctly can result in incorrect major program selection and incorrect reporting to federal agencies. The finding identified was not of a magnitude to impact BDO’s selection of major programs. Repeat Finding – This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation - We recommend management continue to focus on training for both preparer and reviewer of the SEFA to ensure the documented policies and procedures can be performed as prescribed to comply with Section §200.510(b). This will ensure that the SEFA provides all relevant information as prescribed. Views of Responsible Officials – NGA Center agrees with the finding and recommendations set forth within and has developed a corrective action plan to address the instances of noncompliance identified and lapses in prescribed internal controls.
2023-005 - Internal Control Over Compliance and Compliance – Reporting (Preparation of the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards) Program- U.S. Department of Energy, National Forum for State and Territorial Chief Executives - HHS OA, Yr 10 and Yr 11, National Forum ALN: 93.528, Award #: 2U98OA09028, Award Year: 09/01/2022 – 09/29/2023 Program- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Strengthening Public Health Systems and Services through National Partnerships to Improve and Protect the Nation’s Health ALN: 93.421, Award #: Various, Award Year: 08/01/2018 – 07/31/2023 Criteria – 2 CFR Section §200.510(b) states in part: “The auditee must also prepare a schedule of expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) for the period covered by the auditee’s financial statements which must include the total Federal awards expended as determined in accordance with CFR Section §200.502 Basis for determining Federal awards expended.” The schedule must provide total Federal awards expended for each individual Federal program. In accordance with §200.302 Financial Management, a non-federal entity’s financial management systems, including records documenting compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award, must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by general and program-specific terms and conditions; and the tracing of funds to a level of expenditures adequate to establish that such funds have been used according to the federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The financial management system of each non-federal entity must provide for the following: (1) Identification, in its accounts, of all federal awards received and expended and the federal programs under which they were received. (2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in §200.327 Financial Reporting and §200.328 Monitoring and Reporting Program Performance. (3) Records that identify adequately the source and application of funds for federally-funded activities. (4) Effective control over, and accountability for, all funds, property, and other assets. Condition – The internal controls established for the review and approval of the SEFA to ensure its completeness and accuracy did not operate as designed. During our testing of management’s preparation of the SEFA, it was determined that some federal award expenditures were excluded from the original SEFA provided by management. Management subsequently corrected the SEFA to reflect the inclusion of the federal expenditures. In addition, several versions were received from management prior to the final SEFA. Questioned Costs – None. Context – This is a condition identified per review of NGA Center’s compliance with specified requirements. Cause – NGA Center only prepares the SEFA once a year in conjunction with the annual audit. This annual process lends itself to less familiarity with the processes necessary to provide a complete SEFA reporting package and turnover in key personnel historically involved in the SEFA process negatively impacted the process. Effect – Failure to present the SEFA correctly can result in incorrect major program selection and incorrect reporting to federal agencies. The finding identified was not of a magnitude to impact BDO’s selection of major programs. Repeat Finding – This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation - We recommend management continue to focus on training for both preparer and reviewer of the SEFA to ensure the documented policies and procedures can be performed as prescribed to comply with Section §200.510(b). This will ensure that the SEFA provides all relevant information as prescribed. Views of Responsible Officials – NGA Center agrees with the finding and recommendations set forth within and has developed a corrective action plan to address the instances of noncompliance identified and lapses in prescribed internal controls.
2023-005 - Internal Control Over Compliance and Compliance – Reporting (Preparation of the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards) Program- U.S. Department of Energy, National Forum for State and Territorial Chief Executives - HHS OA, Yr 10 and Yr 11, National Forum ALN: 93.528, Award #: 2U98OA09028, Award Year: 09/01/2022 – 09/29/2023 Program- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Strengthening Public Health Systems and Services through National Partnerships to Improve and Protect the Nation’s Health ALN: 93.421, Award #: Various, Award Year: 08/01/2018 – 07/31/2023 Criteria – 2 CFR Section §200.510(b) states in part: “The auditee must also prepare a schedule of expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) for the period covered by the auditee’s financial statements which must include the total Federal awards expended as determined in accordance with CFR Section §200.502 Basis for determining Federal awards expended.” The schedule must provide total Federal awards expended for each individual Federal program. In accordance with §200.302 Financial Management, a non-federal entity’s financial management systems, including records documenting compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award, must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by general and program-specific terms and conditions; and the tracing of funds to a level of expenditures adequate to establish that such funds have been used according to the federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The financial management system of each non-federal entity must provide for the following: (1) Identification, in its accounts, of all federal awards received and expended and the federal programs under which they were received. (2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in §200.327 Financial Reporting and §200.328 Monitoring and Reporting Program Performance. (3) Records that identify adequately the source and application of funds for federally-funded activities. (4) Effective control over, and accountability for, all funds, property, and other assets. Condition – The internal controls established for the review and approval of the SEFA to ensure its completeness and accuracy did not operate as designed. During our testing of management’s preparation of the SEFA, it was determined that some federal award expenditures were excluded from the original SEFA provided by management. Management subsequently corrected the SEFA to reflect the inclusion of the federal expenditures. In addition, several versions were received from management prior to the final SEFA. Questioned Costs – None. Context – This is a condition identified per review of NGA Center’s compliance with specified requirements. Cause – NGA Center only prepares the SEFA once a year in conjunction with the annual audit. This annual process lends itself to less familiarity with the processes necessary to provide a complete SEFA reporting package and turnover in key personnel historically involved in the SEFA process negatively impacted the process. Effect – Failure to present the SEFA correctly can result in incorrect major program selection and incorrect reporting to federal agencies. The finding identified was not of a magnitude to impact BDO’s selection of major programs. Repeat Finding – This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation - We recommend management continue to focus on training for both preparer and reviewer of the SEFA to ensure the documented policies and procedures can be performed as prescribed to comply with Section §200.510(b). This will ensure that the SEFA provides all relevant information as prescribed. Views of Responsible Officials – NGA Center agrees with the finding and recommendations set forth within and has developed a corrective action plan to address the instances of noncompliance identified and lapses in prescribed internal controls.
2023-005 - Internal Control Over Compliance and Compliance – Reporting (Preparation of the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards) Program- U.S. Department of Energy, National Forum for State and Territorial Chief Executives - HHS OA, Yr 10 and Yr 11, National Forum ALN: 93.528, Award #: 2U98OA09028, Award Year: 09/01/2022 – 09/29/2023 Program- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Strengthening Public Health Systems and Services through National Partnerships to Improve and Protect the Nation’s Health ALN: 93.421, Award #: Various, Award Year: 08/01/2018 – 07/31/2023 Criteria – 2 CFR Section §200.510(b) states in part: “The auditee must also prepare a schedule of expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) for the period covered by the auditee’s financial statements which must include the total Federal awards expended as determined in accordance with CFR Section §200.502 Basis for determining Federal awards expended.” The schedule must provide total Federal awards expended for each individual Federal program. In accordance with §200.302 Financial Management, a non-federal entity’s financial management systems, including records documenting compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award, must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by general and program-specific terms and conditions; and the tracing of funds to a level of expenditures adequate to establish that such funds have been used according to the federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The financial management system of each non-federal entity must provide for the following: (1) Identification, in its accounts, of all federal awards received and expended and the federal programs under which they were received. (2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in §200.327 Financial Reporting and §200.328 Monitoring and Reporting Program Performance. (3) Records that identify adequately the source and application of funds for federally-funded activities. (4) Effective control over, and accountability for, all funds, property, and other assets. Condition – The internal controls established for the review and approval of the SEFA to ensure its completeness and accuracy did not operate as designed. During our testing of management’s preparation of the SEFA, it was determined that some federal award expenditures were excluded from the original SEFA provided by management. Management subsequently corrected the SEFA to reflect the inclusion of the federal expenditures. In addition, several versions were received from management prior to the final SEFA. Questioned Costs – None. Context – This is a condition identified per review of NGA Center’s compliance with specified requirements. Cause – NGA Center only prepares the SEFA once a year in conjunction with the annual audit. This annual process lends itself to less familiarity with the processes necessary to provide a complete SEFA reporting package and turnover in key personnel historically involved in the SEFA process negatively impacted the process. Effect – Failure to present the SEFA correctly can result in incorrect major program selection and incorrect reporting to federal agencies. The finding identified was not of a magnitude to impact BDO’s selection of major programs. Repeat Finding – This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation - We recommend management continue to focus on training for both preparer and reviewer of the SEFA to ensure the documented policies and procedures can be performed as prescribed to comply with Section §200.510(b). This will ensure that the SEFA provides all relevant information as prescribed. Views of Responsible Officials – NGA Center agrees with the finding and recommendations set forth within and has developed a corrective action plan to address the instances of noncompliance identified and lapses in prescribed internal controls.
2023-005 - Internal Control Over Compliance and Compliance – Reporting (Preparation of the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards) Program- U.S. Department of Energy, National Forum for State and Territorial Chief Executives - HHS OA, Yr 10 and Yr 11, National Forum ALN: 93.528, Award #: 2U98OA09028, Award Year: 09/01/2022 – 09/29/2023 Program- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Strengthening Public Health Systems and Services through National Partnerships to Improve and Protect the Nation’s Health ALN: 93.421, Award #: Various, Award Year: 08/01/2018 – 07/31/2023 Criteria – 2 CFR Section §200.510(b) states in part: “The auditee must also prepare a schedule of expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) for the period covered by the auditee’s financial statements which must include the total Federal awards expended as determined in accordance with CFR Section §200.502 Basis for determining Federal awards expended.” The schedule must provide total Federal awards expended for each individual Federal program. In accordance with §200.302 Financial Management, a non-federal entity’s financial management systems, including records documenting compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award, must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by general and program-specific terms and conditions; and the tracing of funds to a level of expenditures adequate to establish that such funds have been used according to the federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The financial management system of each non-federal entity must provide for the following: (1) Identification, in its accounts, of all federal awards received and expended and the federal programs under which they were received. (2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in §200.327 Financial Reporting and §200.328 Monitoring and Reporting Program Performance. (3) Records that identify adequately the source and application of funds for federally-funded activities. (4) Effective control over, and accountability for, all funds, property, and other assets. Condition – The internal controls established for the review and approval of the SEFA to ensure its completeness and accuracy did not operate as designed. During our testing of management’s preparation of the SEFA, it was determined that some federal award expenditures were excluded from the original SEFA provided by management. Management subsequently corrected the SEFA to reflect the inclusion of the federal expenditures. In addition, several versions were received from management prior to the final SEFA. Questioned Costs – None. Context – This is a condition identified per review of NGA Center’s compliance with specified requirements. Cause – NGA Center only prepares the SEFA once a year in conjunction with the annual audit. This annual process lends itself to less familiarity with the processes necessary to provide a complete SEFA reporting package and turnover in key personnel historically involved in the SEFA process negatively impacted the process. Effect – Failure to present the SEFA correctly can result in incorrect major program selection and incorrect reporting to federal agencies. The finding identified was not of a magnitude to impact BDO’s selection of major programs. Repeat Finding – This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation - We recommend management continue to focus on training for both preparer and reviewer of the SEFA to ensure the documented policies and procedures can be performed as prescribed to comply with Section §200.510(b). This will ensure that the SEFA provides all relevant information as prescribed. Views of Responsible Officials – NGA Center agrees with the finding and recommendations set forth within and has developed a corrective action plan to address the instances of noncompliance identified and lapses in prescribed internal controls.
2023-005 - Internal Control Over Compliance and Compliance – Reporting (Preparation of the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards) Program- U.S. Department of Energy, National Forum for State and Territorial Chief Executives - HHS OA, Yr 10 and Yr 11, National Forum ALN: 93.528, Award #: 2U98OA09028, Award Year: 09/01/2022 – 09/29/2023 Program- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Strengthening Public Health Systems and Services through National Partnerships to Improve and Protect the Nation’s Health ALN: 93.421, Award #: Various, Award Year: 08/01/2018 – 07/31/2023 Criteria – 2 CFR Section §200.510(b) states in part: “The auditee must also prepare a schedule of expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) for the period covered by the auditee’s financial statements which must include the total Federal awards expended as determined in accordance with CFR Section §200.502 Basis for determining Federal awards expended.” The schedule must provide total Federal awards expended for each individual Federal program. In accordance with §200.302 Financial Management, a non-federal entity’s financial management systems, including records documenting compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award, must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by general and program-specific terms and conditions; and the tracing of funds to a level of expenditures adequate to establish that such funds have been used according to the federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The financial management system of each non-federal entity must provide for the following: (1) Identification, in its accounts, of all federal awards received and expended and the federal programs under which they were received. (2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in §200.327 Financial Reporting and §200.328 Monitoring and Reporting Program Performance. (3) Records that identify adequately the source and application of funds for federally-funded activities. (4) Effective control over, and accountability for, all funds, property, and other assets. Condition – The internal controls established for the review and approval of the SEFA to ensure its completeness and accuracy did not operate as designed. During our testing of management’s preparation of the SEFA, it was determined that some federal award expenditures were excluded from the original SEFA provided by management. Management subsequently corrected the SEFA to reflect the inclusion of the federal expenditures. In addition, several versions were received from management prior to the final SEFA. Questioned Costs – None. Context – This is a condition identified per review of NGA Center’s compliance with specified requirements. Cause – NGA Center only prepares the SEFA once a year in conjunction with the annual audit. This annual process lends itself to less familiarity with the processes necessary to provide a complete SEFA reporting package and turnover in key personnel historically involved in the SEFA process negatively impacted the process. Effect – Failure to present the SEFA correctly can result in incorrect major program selection and incorrect reporting to federal agencies. The finding identified was not of a magnitude to impact BDO’s selection of major programs. Repeat Finding – This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation - We recommend management continue to focus on training for both preparer and reviewer of the SEFA to ensure the documented policies and procedures can be performed as prescribed to comply with Section §200.510(b). This will ensure that the SEFA provides all relevant information as prescribed. Views of Responsible Officials – NGA Center agrees with the finding and recommendations set forth within and has developed a corrective action plan to address the instances of noncompliance identified and lapses in prescribed internal controls.
2023-005 - Internal Control Over Compliance and Compliance – Reporting (Preparation of the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards) Program- U.S. Department of Energy, National Forum for State and Territorial Chief Executives - HHS OA, Yr 10 and Yr 11, National Forum ALN: 93.528, Award #: 2U98OA09028, Award Year: 09/01/2022 – 09/29/2023 Program- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Strengthening Public Health Systems and Services through National Partnerships to Improve and Protect the Nation’s Health ALN: 93.421, Award #: Various, Award Year: 08/01/2018 – 07/31/2023 Criteria – 2 CFR Section §200.510(b) states in part: “The auditee must also prepare a schedule of expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) for the period covered by the auditee’s financial statements which must include the total Federal awards expended as determined in accordance with CFR Section §200.502 Basis for determining Federal awards expended.” The schedule must provide total Federal awards expended for each individual Federal program. In accordance with §200.302 Financial Management, a non-federal entity’s financial management systems, including records documenting compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award, must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by general and program-specific terms and conditions; and the tracing of funds to a level of expenditures adequate to establish that such funds have been used according to the federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The financial management system of each non-federal entity must provide for the following: (1) Identification, in its accounts, of all federal awards received and expended and the federal programs under which they were received. (2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in §200.327 Financial Reporting and §200.328 Monitoring and Reporting Program Performance. (3) Records that identify adequately the source and application of funds for federally-funded activities. (4) Effective control over, and accountability for, all funds, property, and other assets. Condition – The internal controls established for the review and approval of the SEFA to ensure its completeness and accuracy did not operate as designed. During our testing of management’s preparation of the SEFA, it was determined that some federal award expenditures were excluded from the original SEFA provided by management. Management subsequently corrected the SEFA to reflect the inclusion of the federal expenditures. In addition, several versions were received from management prior to the final SEFA. Questioned Costs – None. Context – This is a condition identified per review of NGA Center’s compliance with specified requirements. Cause – NGA Center only prepares the SEFA once a year in conjunction with the annual audit. This annual process lends itself to less familiarity with the processes necessary to provide a complete SEFA reporting package and turnover in key personnel historically involved in the SEFA process negatively impacted the process. Effect – Failure to present the SEFA correctly can result in incorrect major program selection and incorrect reporting to federal agencies. The finding identified was not of a magnitude to impact BDO’s selection of major programs. Repeat Finding – This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation - We recommend management continue to focus on training for both preparer and reviewer of the SEFA to ensure the documented policies and procedures can be performed as prescribed to comply with Section §200.510(b). This will ensure that the SEFA provides all relevant information as prescribed. Views of Responsible Officials – NGA Center agrees with the finding and recommendations set forth within and has developed a corrective action plan to address the instances of noncompliance identified and lapses in prescribed internal controls.
MATERIAL WEAKNESSES 2023-001 - Procurement Policy Federal Program Information: Department of Environmental Protection: 66.468 / 66.483 Drinking Water State Revolving Fund Cluster Criteria: The following CFR(s) apply to this finding: 2 CFR section 200.318 through 200.327. Condition: During audit procedures, it was identified that the Royalton Fire District did not have a procurement policy consistent with federal compliance standards. Cause: The District did not adopt a procurement policy consistent with federal regulations. Effect: By not having a compliant federal procurement policy, the District is at an increased risk for making unallowable purchases. Identification of Questioned Costs: None identified. Context: A review was conducted of the Distict’s procurement policy and the policy was not in compliance with Uniform Guidance. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: It is recommended that the District adopt a federal procurement policy that is consistent with Uniform Guidance. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan: Client agrees with finding, and the unabridged version of their response can be found in the Corrective Action Plan. Please see the Corrective Action Plan issued by the District.
Section III - Federal Awards Findings and Questioned Costs MATERIAL WEAKNESSES 2023-001 - Procurement Policy Federal Program Information: Department of Environmental Protection: 66.458/66.482 Clean Water State Revolving Funds Cluster 21.027 Coronavirus State Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Criteria: The following CFR(s) apply to this finding: 2 CFR section 200.318 through 200.327. Condition: During audit procedures, it was identified that the Town of Van Buren did not have a procurement policy consistent with federal compliance standards. Cause: The District did not adopt a procurement policy consistent with federal regulations. Effect: By not having a compliant federal procurement policy, the Town is at an increased risk for making unallowable purchases. Identification of Questioned Costs: None identified. Context: A review was conducted of the Town’s procurement policy and the policy was not in compliance with Uniform Guidance. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: It is recommended that the Town adopt a federal procurement policy that is consistent with Uniform Guidance. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan: Client agrees with finding, and the unabridged version of their response can be found in the Corrective Action Plan. Please see the Corrective Action Plan issued by the District.