U.S. Department of Treasury COVID 19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds - 21.027 Criteria or Specific Requirement: Procurement and Significant Deficiency In accordance with 2 CFR 200.318, recipients and subrecipients must maintain and use documented procedures for procurement transactions under a Federal award or subaward, including acquisition of property and services. These documented procurement procedures must be consistent with State, local and tribal laws and regulations and the standards identified in 2 CFR 200.317 through 2 CFR 200.327. Condition: During our test work over the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery grant, we noted the Unified Government did not perform procurement procedures on one of its vendor contracts. Questioned Costs - None noted. Context: For 21.027, there were 29 vendors receiving a total of $1,789,214 subject to procurement requirements. Of those 29, a sample of eight vendors receiving a total of $470,106 were selected for testing. One of the eight vendors selected for testing did not undergo the Unified Government's formal procurement procedures. However, the vendor did undergo proper suspension and debarment checks and no issues were identified during this check. The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Identification of Prior Year Finding: N/A Effect: Federal funds could be paid to entities outside of the Unified Government's procurement policy. Cause: The vendor identified was granted a non-competitive procurement under national emergency conditions due to the effects of COVID-19. However, the vendor was utilized again after the national emergency period and the Unified Government's procurement policy should have been followed at this time, but was not. Recommendation: We recommend that the Unified Government communicate to all departments that purchases using federal funds follow the procurement policy procedures prior to purchase and the procurement department provide training on the requirements to properly document that the procedures are completed. View of Responsible Official and Planned Corrective Actions: Departments have been informed of the procurement requirements and the procurement policy will be adhered to on a go forward basis.
Finding 2023-007 Failure to Create and Implement a Suitable Procurement Policy Type of Finding: Noncompliance and Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Condition and Context: The Organization created and implemented a procurement policy to govern its federal expenditures. The procurement policy implemented by the Organization failed to include several key elements, including clearly establishing and governing the various expenditure purchasing thresholds, documenting a sufficient bid process for competitive bid proposals, and standards of conduct covering conflict of interest for employees involved in the bid evaluation process. Further, while the policy was in place, the Organization failed to implement the elements of the policy into its procurement process. As part of audit procedures, 12 transactions were included in the testing population and all 12 were tested. Of the testing group, the auditor identified 4 transactions that required competitive bid procedures for which the Organization failed to conduct. The Organization also failed to document its rationale to limit competition for all items tested. Criteria: Uniform Guidance requires organizations that receive federal funds to establish and maintain effective internal controls, including a documented procurement policy. A procurement policy outlines the procedures, thresholds, and guidelines for acquiring goods and services, ensuring transparency, competition, and cost-effectiveness while preventing fraud, waste, and abuse. Procurement policies must include relevant elements detailed in 2 CFR §200.317 - §200.327. The Organization is required to implement the procurement policy in its procedures and to develop internal controls to ensure its effectiveness. Cause: The Organization had not recognized the significance of a well-structured procurement policy in safeguarding federal funds and ensuring compliance. This lack of awareness led to inadequate attention being given to the establishment of such a policy. Once created, leadership failed to identify an effective implementation strategy to ensure compliance. These issues were exacerbated by a failure to maintain appropriate documentation and to have sufficient internal controls over the procurement process. Effect: The absence of a documented procurement policy exposes the Organization to several risks and potential consequences. Without established guidelines, there is a higher likelihood of inconsistent procurement practices, leading to inefficiencies and increased costs. The absence of a defined procurement process could result in a lack of transparency and accountability in vendor selection and contract award decisions. Failure to have necessary safeguards in standards of conduct over employee actions could result in unreported conflicts of interest or inappropriate actions taking in award decisions. Questioned Costs: Known questioned costs of $24,645 were identified. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: It is recommended that the Organization review their procurement policy in line with Uniform Guidance standards and update the policy to include the missing elements. The Organization should also identify an effective implementation plan to ensure that the procedures over procurement include the elements detailed in its procurement policy. Finally, it is recommended that the Organization implement an effective system of internal controls to ensure that the Organization's procurements are compliant with federal requirements. Views of Responsible Officials: The Organization retained a licensed CPA firm with significant expertise in financial reporting and single audit compliance. The Organization will revise and implement a formal Procurement Policy that fully aligns with Uniform Guidance and federal regulations and conduct mandatory training for all staff involved in the procurement process.
Finding 2023-007 Failure to Create and Implement a Suitable Procurement Policy Type of Finding: Noncompliance and Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Condition and Context: The Organization created and implemented a procurement policy to govern its federal expenditures. The procurement policy implemented by the Organization failed to include several key elements, including clearly establishing and governing the various expenditure purchasing thresholds, documenting a sufficient bid process for competitive bid proposals, and standards of conduct covering conflict of interest for employees involved in the bid evaluation process. Further, while the policy was in place, the Organization failed to implement the elements of the policy into its procurement process. As part of audit procedures, 12 transactions were included in the testing population and all 12 were tested. Of the testing group, the auditor identified 4 transactions that required competitive bid procedures for which the Organization failed to conduct. The Organization also failed to document its rationale to limit competition for all items tested. Criteria: Uniform Guidance requires organizations that receive federal funds to establish and maintain effective internal controls, including a documented procurement policy. A procurement policy outlines the procedures, thresholds, and guidelines for acquiring goods and services, ensuring transparency, competition, and cost-effectiveness while preventing fraud, waste, and abuse. Procurement policies must include relevant elements detailed in 2 CFR §200.317 - §200.327. The Organization is required to implement the procurement policy in its procedures and to develop internal controls to ensure its effectiveness. Cause: The Organization had not recognized the significance of a well-structured procurement policy in safeguarding federal funds and ensuring compliance. This lack of awareness led to inadequate attention being given to the establishment of such a policy. Once created, leadership failed to identify an effective implementation strategy to ensure compliance. These issues were exacerbated by a failure to maintain appropriate documentation and to have sufficient internal controls over the procurement process. Effect: The absence of a documented procurement policy exposes the Organization to several risks and potential consequences. Without established guidelines, there is a higher likelihood of inconsistent procurement practices, leading to inefficiencies and increased costs. The absence of a defined procurement process could result in a lack of transparency and accountability in vendor selection and contract award decisions. Failure to have necessary safeguards in standards of conduct over employee actions could result in unreported conflicts of interest or inappropriate actions taking in award decisions. Questioned Costs: Known questioned costs of $24,645 were identified. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: It is recommended that the Organization review their procurement policy in line with Uniform Guidance standards and update the policy to include the missing elements. The Organization should also identify an effective implementation plan to ensure that the procedures over procurement include the elements detailed in its procurement policy. Finally, it is recommended that the Organization implement an effective system of internal controls to ensure that the Organization's procurements are compliant with federal requirements. Views of Responsible Officials: The Organization retained a licensed CPA firm with significant expertise in financial reporting and single audit compliance. The Organization will revise and implement a formal Procurement Policy that fully aligns with Uniform Guidance and federal regulations and conduct mandatory training for all staff involved in the procurement process.
Finding 2023-007 Failure to Create and Implement a Suitable Procurement Policy Type of Finding: Noncompliance and Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Condition and Context: The Organization created and implemented a procurement policy to govern its federal expenditures. The procurement policy implemented by the Organization failed to include several key elements, including clearly establishing and governing the various expenditure purchasing thresholds, documenting a sufficient bid process for competitive bid proposals, and standards of conduct covering conflict of interest for employees involved in the bid evaluation process. Further, while the policy was in place, the Organization failed to implement the elements of the policy into its procurement process. As part of audit procedures, 12 transactions were included in the testing population and all 12 were tested. Of the testing group, the auditor identified 4 transactions that required competitive bid procedures for which the Organization failed to conduct. The Organization also failed to document its rationale to limit competition for all items tested. Criteria: Uniform Guidance requires organizations that receive federal funds to establish and maintain effective internal controls, including a documented procurement policy. A procurement policy outlines the procedures, thresholds, and guidelines for acquiring goods and services, ensuring transparency, competition, and cost-effectiveness while preventing fraud, waste, and abuse. Procurement policies must include relevant elements detailed in 2 CFR §200.317 - §200.327. The Organization is required to implement the procurement policy in its procedures and to develop internal controls to ensure its effectiveness. Cause: The Organization had not recognized the significance of a well-structured procurement policy in safeguarding federal funds and ensuring compliance. This lack of awareness led to inadequate attention being given to the establishment of such a policy. Once created, leadership failed to identify an effective implementation strategy to ensure compliance. These issues were exacerbated by a failure to maintain appropriate documentation and to have sufficient internal controls over the procurement process. Effect: The absence of a documented procurement policy exposes the Organization to several risks and potential consequences. Without established guidelines, there is a higher likelihood of inconsistent procurement practices, leading to inefficiencies and increased costs. The absence of a defined procurement process could result in a lack of transparency and accountability in vendor selection and contract award decisions. Failure to have necessary safeguards in standards of conduct over employee actions could result in unreported conflicts of interest or inappropriate actions taking in award decisions. Questioned Costs: Known questioned costs of $24,645 were identified. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: It is recommended that the Organization review their procurement policy in line with Uniform Guidance standards and update the policy to include the missing elements. The Organization should also identify an effective implementation plan to ensure that the procedures over procurement include the elements detailed in its procurement policy. Finally, it is recommended that the Organization implement an effective system of internal controls to ensure that the Organization's procurements are compliant with federal requirements. Views of Responsible Officials: The Organization retained a licensed CPA firm with significant expertise in financial reporting and single audit compliance. The Organization will revise and implement a formal Procurement Policy that fully aligns with Uniform Guidance and federal regulations and conduct mandatory training for all staff involved in the procurement process.
Finding 2023-007 Failure to Create and Implement a Suitable Procurement Policy Type of Finding: Noncompliance and Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Condition and Context: The Organization created and implemented a procurement policy to govern its federal expenditures. The procurement policy implemented by the Organization failed to include several key elements, including clearly establishing and governing the various expenditure purchasing thresholds, documenting a sufficient bid process for competitive bid proposals, and standards of conduct covering conflict of interest for employees involved in the bid evaluation process. Further, while the policy was in place, the Organization failed to implement the elements of the policy into its procurement process. As part of audit procedures, 12 transactions were included in the testing population and all 12 were tested. Of the testing group, the auditor identified 4 transactions that required competitive bid procedures for which the Organization failed to conduct. The Organization also failed to document its rationale to limit competition for all items tested. Criteria: Uniform Guidance requires organizations that receive federal funds to establish and maintain effective internal controls, including a documented procurement policy. A procurement policy outlines the procedures, thresholds, and guidelines for acquiring goods and services, ensuring transparency, competition, and cost-effectiveness while preventing fraud, waste, and abuse. Procurement policies must include relevant elements detailed in 2 CFR §200.317 - §200.327. The Organization is required to implement the procurement policy in its procedures and to develop internal controls to ensure its effectiveness. Cause: The Organization had not recognized the significance of a well-structured procurement policy in safeguarding federal funds and ensuring compliance. This lack of awareness led to inadequate attention being given to the establishment of such a policy. Once created, leadership failed to identify an effective implementation strategy to ensure compliance. These issues were exacerbated by a failure to maintain appropriate documentation and to have sufficient internal controls over the procurement process. Effect: The absence of a documented procurement policy exposes the Organization to several risks and potential consequences. Without established guidelines, there is a higher likelihood of inconsistent procurement practices, leading to inefficiencies and increased costs. The absence of a defined procurement process could result in a lack of transparency and accountability in vendor selection and contract award decisions. Failure to have necessary safeguards in standards of conduct over employee actions could result in unreported conflicts of interest or inappropriate actions taking in award decisions. Questioned Costs: Known questioned costs of $24,645 were identified. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: It is recommended that the Organization review their procurement policy in line with Uniform Guidance standards and update the policy to include the missing elements. The Organization should also identify an effective implementation plan to ensure that the procedures over procurement include the elements detailed in its procurement policy. Finally, it is recommended that the Organization implement an effective system of internal controls to ensure that the Organization's procurements are compliant with federal requirements. Views of Responsible Officials: The Organization retained a licensed CPA firm with significant expertise in financial reporting and single audit compliance. The Organization will revise and implement a formal Procurement Policy that fully aligns with Uniform Guidance and federal regulations and conduct mandatory training for all staff involved in the procurement process.
Finding 2023-007 Failure to Create and Implement a Suitable Procurement Policy Type of Finding: Noncompliance and Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Condition and Context: The Organization created and implemented a procurement policy to govern its federal expenditures. The procurement policy implemented by the Organization failed to include several key elements, including clearly establishing and governing the various expenditure purchasing thresholds, documenting a sufficient bid process for competitive bid proposals, and standards of conduct covering conflict of interest for employees involved in the bid evaluation process. Further, while the policy was in place, the Organization failed to implement the elements of the policy into its procurement process. As part of audit procedures, 12 transactions were included in the testing population and all 12 were tested. Of the testing group, the auditor identified 4 transactions that required competitive bid procedures for which the Organization failed to conduct. The Organization also failed to document its rationale to limit competition for all items tested. Criteria: Uniform Guidance requires organizations that receive federal funds to establish and maintain effective internal controls, including a documented procurement policy. A procurement policy outlines the procedures, thresholds, and guidelines for acquiring goods and services, ensuring transparency, competition, and cost-effectiveness while preventing fraud, waste, and abuse. Procurement policies must include relevant elements detailed in 2 CFR §200.317 - §200.327. The Organization is required to implement the procurement policy in its procedures and to develop internal controls to ensure its effectiveness. Cause: The Organization had not recognized the significance of a well-structured procurement policy in safeguarding federal funds and ensuring compliance. This lack of awareness led to inadequate attention being given to the establishment of such a policy. Once created, leadership failed to identify an effective implementation strategy to ensure compliance. These issues were exacerbated by a failure to maintain appropriate documentation and to have sufficient internal controls over the procurement process. Effect: The absence of a documented procurement policy exposes the Organization to several risks and potential consequences. Without established guidelines, there is a higher likelihood of inconsistent procurement practices, leading to inefficiencies and increased costs. The absence of a defined procurement process could result in a lack of transparency and accountability in vendor selection and contract award decisions. Failure to have necessary safeguards in standards of conduct over employee actions could result in unreported conflicts of interest or inappropriate actions taking in award decisions. Questioned Costs: Known questioned costs of $24,645 were identified. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: It is recommended that the Organization review their procurement policy in line with Uniform Guidance standards and update the policy to include the missing elements. The Organization should also identify an effective implementation plan to ensure that the procedures over procurement include the elements detailed in its procurement policy. Finally, it is recommended that the Organization implement an effective system of internal controls to ensure that the Organization's procurements are compliant with federal requirements. Views of Responsible Officials: The Organization retained a licensed CPA firm with significant expertise in financial reporting and single audit compliance. The Organization will revise and implement a formal Procurement Policy that fully aligns with Uniform Guidance and federal regulations and conduct mandatory training for all staff involved in the procurement process.
Finding 2023-002: Procurement US Department of the Treasury – COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (ARPA) (ALN 21.027) Condition: The City could not provide evidence that the Axon contract totaling $651,922 for the year ended December 31, 2023 followed formal procurement procedures. The Axon contract exceeds the Uniform Guidance formal procurement threshold but was done through cooperative purchasing. In addition, in accordance with the Uniform Guidance, a purchase price from a cooperative purchasing program is considered to be only one competitive price proposal and it cannot replace a full procurement process. Criteria: In accordance with Uniform Guidance procurement requirements found in 2 CFR Part 200.318 through 200.327, the City is required to ensure that procurement methods used for purchases are appropriate based on the value of the procurement transaction. Cause: Procedures in place to ensure that the proper procurement process is followed were not adequate. The City relied upon vendors preapproved by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania’s General Services Administration (GSA). These vendors were considered preapproved based on the Commonwealth’s own use of cooperative purchasing programs. Effect: The City was not in compliance with the procurement requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Repeat finding: No Questioned costs: Unknown Recommendation: We recommend that the City establish procedures to ensure that their purchasing policy follows all Uniform Guidance procurement standards, especially regarding cooperating purchasing programs. View of Responsible Officials: Management agrees. See Corrective Action Plan.
Finding 2023-002: Procurement US Department of the Treasury – COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (ARPA) (ALN 21.027) Condition: The City could not provide evidence that the Axon contract totaling $651,922 for the year ended December 31, 2023 followed formal procurement procedures. The Axon contract exceeds the Uniform Guidance formal procurement threshold but was done through cooperative purchasing. In addition, in accordance with the Uniform Guidance, a purchase price from a cooperative purchasing program is considered to be only one competitive price proposal and it cannot replace a full procurement process. Criteria: In accordance with Uniform Guidance procurement requirements found in 2 CFR Part 200.318 through 200.327, the City is required to ensure that procurement methods used for purchases are appropriate based on the value of the procurement transaction. Cause: Procedures in place to ensure that the proper procurement process is followed were not adequate. The City relied upon vendors preapproved by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania’s General Services Administration (GSA). These vendors were considered preapproved based on the Commonwealth’s own use of cooperative purchasing programs. Effect: The City was not in compliance with the procurement requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Repeat finding: No Questioned costs: Unknown Recommendation: We recommend that the City establish procedures to ensure that their purchasing policy follows all Uniform Guidance procurement standards, especially regarding cooperating purchasing programs. View of Responsible Officials: Management agrees. See Corrective Action Plan.
Finding 2023-002: Procurement US Department of the Treasury – COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (ARPA) (ALN 21.027) Condition: The City could not provide evidence that the Axon contract totaling $651,922 for the year ended December 31, 2023 followed formal procurement procedures. The Axon contract exceeds the Uniform Guidance formal procurement threshold but was done through cooperative purchasing. In addition, in accordance with the Uniform Guidance, a purchase price from a cooperative purchasing program is considered to be only one competitive price proposal and it cannot replace a full procurement process. Criteria: In accordance with Uniform Guidance procurement requirements found in 2 CFR Part 200.318 through 200.327, the City is required to ensure that procurement methods used for purchases are appropriate based on the value of the procurement transaction. Cause: Procedures in place to ensure that the proper procurement process is followed were not adequate. The City relied upon vendors preapproved by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania’s General Services Administration (GSA). These vendors were considered preapproved based on the Commonwealth’s own use of cooperative purchasing programs. Effect: The City was not in compliance with the procurement requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Repeat finding: No Questioned costs: Unknown Recommendation: We recommend that the City establish procedures to ensure that their purchasing policy follows all Uniform Guidance procurement standards, especially regarding cooperating purchasing programs. View of Responsible Officials: Management agrees. See Corrective Action Plan.
Finding 2023-002: Procurement US Department of the Treasury – COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (ARPA) (ALN 21.027) Condition: The City could not provide evidence that the Axon contract totaling $651,922 for the year ended December 31, 2023 followed formal procurement procedures. The Axon contract exceeds the Uniform Guidance formal procurement threshold but was done through cooperative purchasing. In addition, in accordance with the Uniform Guidance, a purchase price from a cooperative purchasing program is considered to be only one competitive price proposal and it cannot replace a full procurement process. Criteria: In accordance with Uniform Guidance procurement requirements found in 2 CFR Part 200.318 through 200.327, the City is required to ensure that procurement methods used for purchases are appropriate based on the value of the procurement transaction. Cause: Procedures in place to ensure that the proper procurement process is followed were not adequate. The City relied upon vendors preapproved by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania’s General Services Administration (GSA). These vendors were considered preapproved based on the Commonwealth’s own use of cooperative purchasing programs. Effect: The City was not in compliance with the procurement requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Repeat finding: No Questioned costs: Unknown Recommendation: We recommend that the City establish procedures to ensure that their purchasing policy follows all Uniform Guidance procurement standards, especially regarding cooperating purchasing programs. View of Responsible Officials: Management agrees. See Corrective Action Plan.
Finding 2023-002: Procurement US Department of the Treasury – COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (ARPA) (ALN 21.027) Condition: The City could not provide evidence that the Axon contract totaling $651,922 for the year ended December 31, 2023 followed formal procurement procedures. The Axon contract exceeds the Uniform Guidance formal procurement threshold but was done through cooperative purchasing. In addition, in accordance with the Uniform Guidance, a purchase price from a cooperative purchasing program is considered to be only one competitive price proposal and it cannot replace a full procurement process. Criteria: In accordance with Uniform Guidance procurement requirements found in 2 CFR Part 200.318 through 200.327, the City is required to ensure that procurement methods used for purchases are appropriate based on the value of the procurement transaction. Cause: Procedures in place to ensure that the proper procurement process is followed were not adequate. The City relied upon vendors preapproved by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania’s General Services Administration (GSA). These vendors were considered preapproved based on the Commonwealth’s own use of cooperative purchasing programs. Effect: The City was not in compliance with the procurement requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Repeat finding: No Questioned costs: Unknown Recommendation: We recommend that the City establish procedures to ensure that their purchasing policy follows all Uniform Guidance procurement standards, especially regarding cooperating purchasing programs. View of Responsible Officials: Management agrees. See Corrective Action Plan.
Finding 2023-005 – Procurement Repeat Finding – See Finding 2022-007 US Department of the Treasury – COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (ARPA) (ALN 21.027) Condition: The City could not provide evidence that the water main replacement project totaling $3,104,970 for the year ended December 31, 2023 followed formal procurement procedures. The water main replacement contract exceeds the Uniform Guidance formal procurement methods. In addition, in accordance with the Uniform Guidance, a purchase price from the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania COSTARS cooperative purchasing program is considered to be only one competitive price proposal and it cannot replace a full procurement process. Criteria: In accordance with Uniform Guidance procurement requirements found in 2 CFR Part 200.318 through 200.327, the City is required to ensure that procurement methods used for purchases are appropriate based on the dollar amount of the purchase. Cause: Procedures in place to ensure that the proper procurement process is followed were not adequate. Effect: The City was not in compliance with the procurement requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Repeat Finding: Yes Questioned costs: Unknown Recommendation: We recommend that the City establish procedures to ensure that their purchasing policy follows Uniform Guidance procurement standards. View of Responsible Official: The City agrees. See the corrective action plan.
Finding 2023-005 – Procurement Repeat Finding – See Finding 2022-007 US Department of the Treasury – COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (ARPA) (ALN 21.027) Condition: The City could not provide evidence that the water main replacement project totaling $3,104,970 for the year ended December 31, 2023 followed formal procurement procedures. The water main replacement contract exceeds the Uniform Guidance formal procurement methods. In addition, in accordance with the Uniform Guidance, a purchase price from the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania COSTARS cooperative purchasing program is considered to be only one competitive price proposal and it cannot replace a full procurement process. Criteria: In accordance with Uniform Guidance procurement requirements found in 2 CFR Part 200.318 through 200.327, the City is required to ensure that procurement methods used for purchases are appropriate based on the dollar amount of the purchase. Cause: Procedures in place to ensure that the proper procurement process is followed were not adequate. Effect: The City was not in compliance with the procurement requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Repeat Finding: Yes Questioned costs: Unknown Recommendation: We recommend that the City establish procedures to ensure that their purchasing policy follows Uniform Guidance procurement standards. View of Responsible Official: The City agrees. See the corrective action plan.
Finding 2023-005 – Procurement Repeat Finding – See Finding 2022-007 US Department of the Treasury – COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (ARPA) (ALN 21.027) Condition: The City could not provide evidence that the water main replacement project totaling $3,104,970 for the year ended December 31, 2023 followed formal procurement procedures. The water main replacement contract exceeds the Uniform Guidance formal procurement methods. In addition, in accordance with the Uniform Guidance, a purchase price from the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania COSTARS cooperative purchasing program is considered to be only one competitive price proposal and it cannot replace a full procurement process. Criteria: In accordance with Uniform Guidance procurement requirements found in 2 CFR Part 200.318 through 200.327, the City is required to ensure that procurement methods used for purchases are appropriate based on the dollar amount of the purchase. Cause: Procedures in place to ensure that the proper procurement process is followed were not adequate. Effect: The City was not in compliance with the procurement requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Repeat Finding: Yes Questioned costs: Unknown Recommendation: We recommend that the City establish procedures to ensure that their purchasing policy follows Uniform Guidance procurement standards. View of Responsible Official: The City agrees. See the corrective action plan.
Finding 2023-005 – Procurement Repeat Finding – See Finding 2022-007 US Department of the Treasury – COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (ARPA) (ALN 21.027) Condition: The City could not provide evidence that the water main replacement project totaling $3,104,970 for the year ended December 31, 2023 followed formal procurement procedures. The water main replacement contract exceeds the Uniform Guidance formal procurement methods. In addition, in accordance with the Uniform Guidance, a purchase price from the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania COSTARS cooperative purchasing program is considered to be only one competitive price proposal and it cannot replace a full procurement process. Criteria: In accordance with Uniform Guidance procurement requirements found in 2 CFR Part 200.318 through 200.327, the City is required to ensure that procurement methods used for purchases are appropriate based on the dollar amount of the purchase. Cause: Procedures in place to ensure that the proper procurement process is followed were not adequate. Effect: The City was not in compliance with the procurement requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Repeat Finding: Yes Questioned costs: Unknown Recommendation: We recommend that the City establish procedures to ensure that their purchasing policy follows Uniform Guidance procurement standards. View of Responsible Official: The City agrees. See the corrective action plan.
Program: Continuum of Care, Emergency Solutions Grant Program Federal Financial Assistance Listing No.:14.267, 14.231 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Pass-through: Sacramento Steps Forward, Sacramento County Department of Human Assistance Award Year: 2023 Compliance Requirement: Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Grant Award Number: CA0955L9T032108, CA0955L9T032209, CA0143L9T032114, CA0143L9T032215, CA1303L9T032107, CA1303L9T032208, DHA-NM-03-23, DHA-NM-03-24 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Controls Over Compliance Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303(a) of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) establishes that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides assurance that the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and conditions of the federal award. The nonfederal entity’s documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in 2 CFR 200.317 through 200.327. 2 CFR 200 Appendix II requires certain provisions be included in contracts if criteria are met. As outlined in 2 CFR 180, recipients must not utilize any contractor which is suspended or debarred or is otherwise excluded from the central contractor registry. Condition Found: The Organization’s procurement policy did not include all the required elements as outlined in the Uniform Guidance. Additionally, the Organization did not retain documentation to support the procedures performed to ensure compliance with suspension and debarment requirements. Cause: The Organization does not typically receive federal financial assistance that is subject to procurement and suspension and debarment regulations; consequently, certain elements required by the Uniform Guidance were missing. Effect: Lack of complete procurement, suspension, and debarment policies and not retaining documentation to support compliance with suspension and debarment requirements could result in noncompliance with Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs were identified as a result of our procedures. Context/ Sampling: Suspension and debarment was applicable to 9 contractors totaling $1,989,106 under the Continuum of Care Program and three contractors totaling $227,772 under the Emergency Solutions Grant Program. We tested all contractors with total payments exceeding $25,000 during the year. Repeat Finding from Prior Years: Yes, Finding 2022-03. Recommendation: We recommend that management develop a written procurement policy that conforms with Uniform Guidance. In addition, we recommend that management implement procedures and control processes to retain documentation supporting compliance with major federal program compliance requirements regarding suspension and debarment. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees. See separately issued Corrective Action Plan.
Program: Continuum of Care, Emergency Solutions Grant Program Federal Financial Assistance Listing No.:14.267, 14.231 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Pass-through: Sacramento Steps Forward, Sacramento County Department of Human Assistance Award Year: 2023 Compliance Requirement: Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Grant Award Number: CA0955L9T032108, CA0955L9T032209, CA0143L9T032114, CA0143L9T032215, CA1303L9T032107, CA1303L9T032208, DHA-NM-03-23, DHA-NM-03-24 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Controls Over Compliance Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303(a) of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) establishes that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides assurance that the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and conditions of the federal award. The nonfederal entity’s documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in 2 CFR 200.317 through 200.327. 2 CFR 200 Appendix II requires certain provisions be included in contracts if criteria are met. As outlined in 2 CFR 180, recipients must not utilize any contractor which is suspended or debarred or is otherwise excluded from the central contractor registry. Condition Found: The Organization’s procurement policy did not include all the required elements as outlined in the Uniform Guidance. Additionally, the Organization did not retain documentation to support the procedures performed to ensure compliance with suspension and debarment requirements. Cause: The Organization does not typically receive federal financial assistance that is subject to procurement and suspension and debarment regulations; consequently, certain elements required by the Uniform Guidance were missing. Effect: Lack of complete procurement, suspension, and debarment policies and not retaining documentation to support compliance with suspension and debarment requirements could result in noncompliance with Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs were identified as a result of our procedures. Context/ Sampling: Suspension and debarment was applicable to 9 contractors totaling $1,989,106 under the Continuum of Care Program and three contractors totaling $227,772 under the Emergency Solutions Grant Program. We tested all contractors with total payments exceeding $25,000 during the year. Repeat Finding from Prior Years: Yes, Finding 2022-03. Recommendation: We recommend that management develop a written procurement policy that conforms with Uniform Guidance. In addition, we recommend that management implement procedures and control processes to retain documentation supporting compliance with major federal program compliance requirements regarding suspension and debarment. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees. See separately issued Corrective Action Plan.
Program: Continuum of Care, Emergency Solutions Grant Program Federal Financial Assistance Listing No.:14.267, 14.231 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Pass-through: Sacramento Steps Forward, Sacramento County Department of Human Assistance Award Year: 2023 Compliance Requirement: Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Grant Award Number: CA0955L9T032108, CA0955L9T032209, CA0143L9T032114, CA0143L9T032215, CA1303L9T032107, CA1303L9T032208, DHA-NM-03-23, DHA-NM-03-24 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Controls Over Compliance Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303(a) of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) establishes that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides assurance that the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and conditions of the federal award. The nonfederal entity’s documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in 2 CFR 200.317 through 200.327. 2 CFR 200 Appendix II requires certain provisions be included in contracts if criteria are met. As outlined in 2 CFR 180, recipients must not utilize any contractor which is suspended or debarred or is otherwise excluded from the central contractor registry. Condition Found: The Organization’s procurement policy did not include all the required elements as outlined in the Uniform Guidance. Additionally, the Organization did not retain documentation to support the procedures performed to ensure compliance with suspension and debarment requirements. Cause: The Organization does not typically receive federal financial assistance that is subject to procurement and suspension and debarment regulations; consequently, certain elements required by the Uniform Guidance were missing. Effect: Lack of complete procurement, suspension, and debarment policies and not retaining documentation to support compliance with suspension and debarment requirements could result in noncompliance with Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs were identified as a result of our procedures. Context/ Sampling: Suspension and debarment was applicable to 9 contractors totaling $1,989,106 under the Continuum of Care Program and three contractors totaling $227,772 under the Emergency Solutions Grant Program. We tested all contractors with total payments exceeding $25,000 during the year. Repeat Finding from Prior Years: Yes, Finding 2022-03. Recommendation: We recommend that management develop a written procurement policy that conforms with Uniform Guidance. In addition, we recommend that management implement procedures and control processes to retain documentation supporting compliance with major federal program compliance requirements regarding suspension and debarment. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees. See separately issued Corrective Action Plan.
Program: Continuum of Care, Emergency Solutions Grant Program Federal Financial Assistance Listing No.:14.267, 14.231 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Pass-through: Sacramento Steps Forward, Sacramento County Department of Human Assistance Award Year: 2023 Compliance Requirement: Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Grant Award Number: CA0955L9T032108, CA0955L9T032209, CA0143L9T032114, CA0143L9T032215, CA1303L9T032107, CA1303L9T032208, DHA-NM-03-23, DHA-NM-03-24 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Controls Over Compliance Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303(a) of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) establishes that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides assurance that the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and conditions of the federal award. The nonfederal entity’s documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in 2 CFR 200.317 through 200.327. 2 CFR 200 Appendix II requires certain provisions be included in contracts if criteria are met. As outlined in 2 CFR 180, recipients must not utilize any contractor which is suspended or debarred or is otherwise excluded from the central contractor registry. Condition Found: The Organization’s procurement policy did not include all the required elements as outlined in the Uniform Guidance. Additionally, the Organization did not retain documentation to support the procedures performed to ensure compliance with suspension and debarment requirements. Cause: The Organization does not typically receive federal financial assistance that is subject to procurement and suspension and debarment regulations; consequently, certain elements required by the Uniform Guidance were missing. Effect: Lack of complete procurement, suspension, and debarment policies and not retaining documentation to support compliance with suspension and debarment requirements could result in noncompliance with Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs were identified as a result of our procedures. Context/ Sampling: Suspension and debarment was applicable to 9 contractors totaling $1,989,106 under the Continuum of Care Program and three contractors totaling $227,772 under the Emergency Solutions Grant Program. We tested all contractors with total payments exceeding $25,000 during the year. Repeat Finding from Prior Years: Yes, Finding 2022-03. Recommendation: We recommend that management develop a written procurement policy that conforms with Uniform Guidance. In addition, we recommend that management implement procedures and control processes to retain documentation supporting compliance with major federal program compliance requirements regarding suspension and debarment. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees. See separately issued Corrective Action Plan.
Program: Continuum of Care, Emergency Solutions Grant Program Federal Financial Assistance Listing No.:14.267, 14.231 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Pass-through: Sacramento Steps Forward, Sacramento County Department of Human Assistance Award Year: 2023 Compliance Requirement: Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Grant Award Number: CA0955L9T032108, CA0955L9T032209, CA0143L9T032114, CA0143L9T032215, CA1303L9T032107, CA1303L9T032208, DHA-NM-03-23, DHA-NM-03-24 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Controls Over Compliance Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303(a) of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) establishes that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides assurance that the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and conditions of the federal award. The nonfederal entity’s documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in 2 CFR 200.317 through 200.327. 2 CFR 200 Appendix II requires certain provisions be included in contracts if criteria are met. As outlined in 2 CFR 180, recipients must not utilize any contractor which is suspended or debarred or is otherwise excluded from the central contractor registry. Condition Found: The Organization’s procurement policy did not include all the required elements as outlined in the Uniform Guidance. Additionally, the Organization did not retain documentation to support the procedures performed to ensure compliance with suspension and debarment requirements. Cause: The Organization does not typically receive federal financial assistance that is subject to procurement and suspension and debarment regulations; consequently, certain elements required by the Uniform Guidance were missing. Effect: Lack of complete procurement, suspension, and debarment policies and not retaining documentation to support compliance with suspension and debarment requirements could result in noncompliance with Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs were identified as a result of our procedures. Context/ Sampling: Suspension and debarment was applicable to 9 contractors totaling $1,989,106 under the Continuum of Care Program and three contractors totaling $227,772 under the Emergency Solutions Grant Program. We tested all contractors with total payments exceeding $25,000 during the year. Repeat Finding from Prior Years: Yes, Finding 2022-03. Recommendation: We recommend that management develop a written procurement policy that conforms with Uniform Guidance. In addition, we recommend that management implement procedures and control processes to retain documentation supporting compliance with major federal program compliance requirements regarding suspension and debarment. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees. See separately issued Corrective Action Plan.
Program: Continuum of Care, Emergency Solutions Grant Program Federal Financial Assistance Listing No.:14.267, 14.231 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Pass-through: Sacramento Steps Forward, Sacramento County Department of Human Assistance Award Year: 2023 Compliance Requirement: Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Grant Award Number: CA0955L9T032108, CA0955L9T032209, CA0143L9T032114, CA0143L9T032215, CA1303L9T032107, CA1303L9T032208, DHA-NM-03-23, DHA-NM-03-24 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Controls Over Compliance Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303(a) of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) establishes that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides assurance that the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and conditions of the federal award. The nonfederal entity’s documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in 2 CFR 200.317 through 200.327. 2 CFR 200 Appendix II requires certain provisions be included in contracts if criteria are met. As outlined in 2 CFR 180, recipients must not utilize any contractor which is suspended or debarred or is otherwise excluded from the central contractor registry. Condition Found: The Organization’s procurement policy did not include all the required elements as outlined in the Uniform Guidance. Additionally, the Organization did not retain documentation to support the procedures performed to ensure compliance with suspension and debarment requirements. Cause: The Organization does not typically receive federal financial assistance that is subject to procurement and suspension and debarment regulations; consequently, certain elements required by the Uniform Guidance were missing. Effect: Lack of complete procurement, suspension, and debarment policies and not retaining documentation to support compliance with suspension and debarment requirements could result in noncompliance with Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs were identified as a result of our procedures. Context/ Sampling: Suspension and debarment was applicable to 9 contractors totaling $1,989,106 under the Continuum of Care Program and three contractors totaling $227,772 under the Emergency Solutions Grant Program. We tested all contractors with total payments exceeding $25,000 during the year. Repeat Finding from Prior Years: Yes, Finding 2022-03. Recommendation: We recommend that management develop a written procurement policy that conforms with Uniform Guidance. In addition, we recommend that management implement procedures and control processes to retain documentation supporting compliance with major federal program compliance requirements regarding suspension and debarment. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees. See separately issued Corrective Action Plan.
Program: Continuum of Care, Emergency Solutions Grant Program Federal Financial Assistance Listing No.:14.267, 14.231 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Pass-through: Sacramento Steps Forward, Sacramento County Department of Human Assistance Award Year: 2023 Compliance Requirement: Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Grant Award Number: CA0955L9T032108, CA0955L9T032209, CA0143L9T032114, CA0143L9T032215, CA1303L9T032107, CA1303L9T032208, DHA-NM-03-23, DHA-NM-03-24 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Controls Over Compliance Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303(a) of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) establishes that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides assurance that the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and conditions of the federal award. The nonfederal entity’s documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in 2 CFR 200.317 through 200.327. 2 CFR 200 Appendix II requires certain provisions be included in contracts if criteria are met. As outlined in 2 CFR 180, recipients must not utilize any contractor which is suspended or debarred or is otherwise excluded from the central contractor registry. Condition Found: The Organization’s procurement policy did not include all the required elements as outlined in the Uniform Guidance. Additionally, the Organization did not retain documentation to support the procedures performed to ensure compliance with suspension and debarment requirements. Cause: The Organization does not typically receive federal financial assistance that is subject to procurement and suspension and debarment regulations; consequently, certain elements required by the Uniform Guidance were missing. Effect: Lack of complete procurement, suspension, and debarment policies and not retaining documentation to support compliance with suspension and debarment requirements could result in noncompliance with Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs were identified as a result of our procedures. Context/ Sampling: Suspension and debarment was applicable to 9 contractors totaling $1,989,106 under the Continuum of Care Program and three contractors totaling $227,772 under the Emergency Solutions Grant Program. We tested all contractors with total payments exceeding $25,000 during the year. Repeat Finding from Prior Years: Yes, Finding 2022-03. Recommendation: We recommend that management develop a written procurement policy that conforms with Uniform Guidance. In addition, we recommend that management implement procedures and control processes to retain documentation supporting compliance with major federal program compliance requirements regarding suspension and debarment. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees. See separately issued Corrective Action Plan.
Program: Continuum of Care, Emergency Solutions Grant Program Federal Financial Assistance Listing No.:14.267, 14.231 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Pass-through: Sacramento Steps Forward, Sacramento County Department of Human Assistance Award Year: 2023 Compliance Requirement: Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Grant Award Number: CA0955L9T032108, CA0955L9T032209, CA0143L9T032114, CA0143L9T032215, CA1303L9T032107, CA1303L9T032208, DHA-NM-03-23, DHA-NM-03-24 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Controls Over Compliance Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303(a) of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) establishes that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides assurance that the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and conditions of the federal award. The nonfederal entity’s documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in 2 CFR 200.317 through 200.327. 2 CFR 200 Appendix II requires certain provisions be included in contracts if criteria are met. As outlined in 2 CFR 180, recipients must not utilize any contractor which is suspended or debarred or is otherwise excluded from the central contractor registry. Condition Found: The Organization’s procurement policy did not include all the required elements as outlined in the Uniform Guidance. Additionally, the Organization did not retain documentation to support the procedures performed to ensure compliance with suspension and debarment requirements. Cause: The Organization does not typically receive federal financial assistance that is subject to procurement and suspension and debarment regulations; consequently, certain elements required by the Uniform Guidance were missing. Effect: Lack of complete procurement, suspension, and debarment policies and not retaining documentation to support compliance with suspension and debarment requirements could result in noncompliance with Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs were identified as a result of our procedures. Context/ Sampling: Suspension and debarment was applicable to 9 contractors totaling $1,989,106 under the Continuum of Care Program and three contractors totaling $227,772 under the Emergency Solutions Grant Program. We tested all contractors with total payments exceeding $25,000 during the year. Repeat Finding from Prior Years: Yes, Finding 2022-03. Recommendation: We recommend that management develop a written procurement policy that conforms with Uniform Guidance. In addition, we recommend that management implement procedures and control processes to retain documentation supporting compliance with major federal program compliance requirements regarding suspension and debarment. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees. See separately issued Corrective Action Plan.
2023-001 – Uniform Guidance Procurement Standards Criteria: One of the more significant provisions of the Uniform Guidance that affects the District is the procurement standards under 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.327. Under the procurement standards, the Trust is required to have a documented purchasing policy, which at a minimum incorporates the provisions of the Uniform Guidance. Statement of Condition: The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) revised regulations applicable to federally funded programs. The new regulations are contained in Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). The Uniform Guidance replaced OMB Circulars A-133, A-87, and A-110 and incorporates new requirements for grant recipients. The Uniform Guidance includes not only protocols for program management and administration, but also updates compliance regulations for federal awards. Currently, the District does not have a formal written procurement policy that incorporates all provisions of the Uniform Guidance procurement standards. Cause: The District has not adopted a procurement policy that covers all aspects required by the Uniform Guidance. However, during our testing of procurement over federal expenditures, we did not notate any violations of the Uniform Guidance procurement standards. Effect: Items required by the Uniform Guidance procurement standards that are not currently addressed in the District’s procurement policy are as follows: • Contracting with small and minority businesses, women’s business enterprises, and labor surplus area firms • General procurement standards, including oversight of contractors, conflicts of interest, and avoidance of duplicative items • Competition • Bonding requirements • Contract provisions • Federal agency or pass-through entity review • Subrecipient and contractor determinations • Retention requirements for records • Domestic preferences • Procurement of recovered materials Recommendation: We recommend that management review the applicable provisions of the Uniform Guidance procurement standards and update the District’s procurement policy appropriately. This would include adding any missing components to the District’s current procurement policy and updating definitions of types of procurement (i.e., micro-purchases, small purchases, and small acquisition threshold), to match the language used in the Uniform Guidance procurement standards. Questioned Costs: None
2023-001 – Uniform Guidance Procurement Standards Criteria: One of the more significant provisions of the Uniform Guidance that affects the District is the procurement standards under 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.327. Under the procurement standards, the Trust is required to have a documented purchasing policy, which at a minimum incorporates the provisions of the Uniform Guidance. Statement of Condition: The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) revised regulations applicable to federally funded programs. The new regulations are contained in Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). The Uniform Guidance replaced OMB Circulars A-133, A-87, and A-110 and incorporates new requirements for grant recipients. The Uniform Guidance includes not only protocols for program management and administration, but also updates compliance regulations for federal awards. Currently, the District does not have a formal written procurement policy that incorporates all provisions of the Uniform Guidance procurement standards. Cause: The District has not adopted a procurement policy that covers all aspects required by the Uniform Guidance. However, during our testing of procurement over federal expenditures, we did not notate any violations of the Uniform Guidance procurement standards. Effect: Items required by the Uniform Guidance procurement standards that are not currently addressed in the District’s procurement policy are as follows: • Contracting with small and minority businesses, women’s business enterprises, and labor surplus area firms • General procurement standards, including oversight of contractors, conflicts of interest, and avoidance of duplicative items • Competition • Bonding requirements • Contract provisions • Federal agency or pass-through entity review • Subrecipient and contractor determinations • Retention requirements for records • Domestic preferences • Procurement of recovered materials Recommendation: We recommend that management review the applicable provisions of the Uniform Guidance procurement standards and update the District’s procurement policy appropriately. This would include adding any missing components to the District’s current procurement policy and updating definitions of types of procurement (i.e., micro-purchases, small purchases, and small acquisition threshold), to match the language used in the Uniform Guidance procurement standards. Questioned Costs: None
2023-001 – Uniform Guidance Procurement Standards Criteria: One of the more significant provisions of the Uniform Guidance that affects the District is the procurement standards under 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.327. Under the procurement standards, the Trust is required to have a documented purchasing policy, which at a minimum incorporates the provisions of the Uniform Guidance. Statement of Condition: The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) revised regulations applicable to federally funded programs. The new regulations are contained in Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). The Uniform Guidance replaced OMB Circulars A-133, A-87, and A-110 and incorporates new requirements for grant recipients. The Uniform Guidance includes not only protocols for program management and administration, but also updates compliance regulations for federal awards. Currently, the District does not have a formal written procurement policy that incorporates all provisions of the Uniform Guidance procurement standards. Cause: The District has not adopted a procurement policy that covers all aspects required by the Uniform Guidance. However, during our testing of procurement over federal expenditures, we did not notate any violations of the Uniform Guidance procurement standards. Effect: Items required by the Uniform Guidance procurement standards that are not currently addressed in the District’s procurement policy are as follows: • Contracting with small and minority businesses, women’s business enterprises, and labor surplus area firms • General procurement standards, including oversight of contractors, conflicts of interest, and avoidance of duplicative items • Competition • Bonding requirements • Contract provisions • Federal agency or pass-through entity review • Subrecipient and contractor determinations • Retention requirements for records • Domestic preferences • Procurement of recovered materials Recommendation: We recommend that management review the applicable provisions of the Uniform Guidance procurement standards and update the District’s procurement policy appropriately. This would include adding any missing components to the District’s current procurement policy and updating definitions of types of procurement (i.e., micro-purchases, small purchases, and small acquisition threshold), to match the language used in the Uniform Guidance procurement standards. Questioned Costs: None
2023-001 – Uniform Guidance Procurement Standards Criteria: One of the more significant provisions of the Uniform Guidance that affects the District is the procurement standards under 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.327. Under the procurement standards, the Trust is required to have a documented purchasing policy, which at a minimum incorporates the provisions of the Uniform Guidance. Statement of Condition: The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) revised regulations applicable to federally funded programs. The new regulations are contained in Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). The Uniform Guidance replaced OMB Circulars A-133, A-87, and A-110 and incorporates new requirements for grant recipients. The Uniform Guidance includes not only protocols for program management and administration, but also updates compliance regulations for federal awards. Currently, the District does not have a formal written procurement policy that incorporates all provisions of the Uniform Guidance procurement standards. Cause: The District has not adopted a procurement policy that covers all aspects required by the Uniform Guidance. However, during our testing of procurement over federal expenditures, we did not notate any violations of the Uniform Guidance procurement standards. Effect: Items required by the Uniform Guidance procurement standards that are not currently addressed in the District’s procurement policy are as follows: • Contracting with small and minority businesses, women’s business enterprises, and labor surplus area firms • General procurement standards, including oversight of contractors, conflicts of interest, and avoidance of duplicative items • Competition • Bonding requirements • Contract provisions • Federal agency or pass-through entity review • Subrecipient and contractor determinations • Retention requirements for records • Domestic preferences • Procurement of recovered materials Recommendation: We recommend that management review the applicable provisions of the Uniform Guidance procurement standards and update the District’s procurement policy appropriately. This would include adding any missing components to the District’s current procurement policy and updating definitions of types of procurement (i.e., micro-purchases, small purchases, and small acquisition threshold), to match the language used in the Uniform Guidance procurement standards. Questioned Costs: None
Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR Part 200 sections 200.318-327 outline the required general procurement standards, competition, and methods of procurement to be followed. These elements must be incorporated into an organization’s procurement policies and must be followed to ensure procurements are supported and covered transactions are only entered into with entities that are not federally suspended or debarred. Condition: ICEDC’s procurement policy is not in compliance with Uniform Guidance. For the sampled procurement transactions, documentation was not retained for determining that vendors were single source, as required by Uniform Guidance. In addition, documentation was not retained showing selected entities were checked for suspension and debarment prior to entering into the covered transactions. Questioned costs: None. Context: As the ICEDC procurement policy did not specify a micro purchase threshold, CLA tested all procurement transactions charged to the major program that exceeded Uniform Guidance's micro purchase threshold of $10,000 (a total of 3 procurement). The transactions were found to be out of compliance with federal procurement requirements, as documentation was not retained detailing the history of the procurement; determination process of contractors as single source, including the rationale for the method of procurement; determination of contract type; basis for contractor selection; and the basis for the contract price. Documentation should be retained to evidence that an adequate number of quotes were reviewed, that price analysis was performed, and the rationale that a procurement should be considered a noncompetitive procurement. In addition, documentation was not retained showing that the procured vendors were checked for federal suspension and debarment prior to entering into the covered transactions. Cause: Due to improper policy in place and lack of knowledge about federal procurement, suspension and debarment, and documentation requirements. Effect: Noncompliant policies and documentation can lead to selecting vendors that are federally suspended or debarred and could result in procurement of goods and services that are unideal for the federal program. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: CLA recommends ICEDC to update the procurement policy to be compliance in with Uniform Guidance and to include more rigorous documentation as required by 2 CFR sections 200.318-200.327. ICEDC needs to ensure that policy includes the need for suspension and debarment checks to be done prior to entering into a covered transaction. CLA also recommends emphasizing the importance of the procurement standards and established policy to all authorized purchasers within ICEDC. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR Part 200 sections 200.318-327 outline the required general procurement standards, competition, and methods of procurement to be followed. These elements must be incorporated into an organization’s procurement policies and must be followed to ensure procurements are supported and covered transactions are only entered into with entities that are not federally suspended or debarred. Condition: ICEDC’s procurement policy is not in compliance with Uniform Guidance. For the sampled procurement transactions, documentation was not retained for determining that vendors were single source, as required by Uniform Guidance. In addition, documentation was not retained showing selected entities were checked for suspension and debarment prior to entering into the covered transactions. Questioned costs: None. Context: As the ICEDC procurement policy did not specify a micro purchase threshold, CLA tested all procurement transactions charged to the major program that exceeded Uniform Guidance's micro purchase threshold of $10,000 (a total of 3 procurement). The transactions were found to be out of compliance with federal procurement requirements, as documentation was not retained detailing the history of the procurement; determination process of contractors as single source, including the rationale for the method of procurement; determination of contract type; basis for contractor selection; and the basis for the contract price. Documentation should be retained to evidence that an adequate number of quotes were reviewed, that price analysis was performed, and the rationale that a procurement should be considered a noncompetitive procurement. In addition, documentation was not retained showing that the procured vendors were checked for federal suspension and debarment prior to entering into the covered transactions. Cause: Due to improper policy in place and lack of knowledge about federal procurement, suspension and debarment, and documentation requirements. Effect: Noncompliant policies and documentation can lead to selecting vendors that are federally suspended or debarred and could result in procurement of goods and services that are unideal for the federal program. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: CLA recommends ICEDC to update the procurement policy to be compliance in with Uniform Guidance and to include more rigorous documentation as required by 2 CFR sections 200.318-200.327. ICEDC needs to ensure that policy includes the need for suspension and debarment checks to be done prior to entering into a covered transaction. CLA also recommends emphasizing the importance of the procurement standards and established policy to all authorized purchasers within ICEDC. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR Part 200 sections 200.318-327 outline the required general procurement standards, competition, and methods of procurement to be followed. These elements must be incorporated into an organization’s procurement policies and must be followed to ensure procurements are supported and covered transactions are only entered into with entities that are not federally suspended or debarred. Condition: ICEDC’s procurement policy is not in compliance with Uniform Guidance. For the sampled procurement transactions, documentation was not retained for determining that vendors were single source, as required by Uniform Guidance. In addition, documentation was not retained showing selected entities were checked for suspension and debarment prior to entering into the covered transactions. Questioned costs: None. Context: As the ICEDC procurement policy did not specify a micro purchase threshold, CLA tested all procurement transactions charged to the major program that exceeded Uniform Guidance's micro purchase threshold of $10,000 (a total of 3 procurement). The transactions were found to be out of compliance with federal procurement requirements, as documentation was not retained detailing the history of the procurement; determination process of contractors as single source, including the rationale for the method of procurement; determination of contract type; basis for contractor selection; and the basis for the contract price. Documentation should be retained to evidence that an adequate number of quotes were reviewed, that price analysis was performed, and the rationale that a procurement should be considered a noncompetitive procurement. In addition, documentation was not retained showing that the procured vendors were checked for federal suspension and debarment prior to entering into the covered transactions. Cause: Due to improper policy in place and lack of knowledge about federal procurement, suspension and debarment, and documentation requirements. Effect: Noncompliant policies and documentation can lead to selecting vendors that are federally suspended or debarred and could result in procurement of goods and services that are unideal for the federal program. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: CLA recommends ICEDC to update the procurement policy to be compliance in with Uniform Guidance and to include more rigorous documentation as required by 2 CFR sections 200.318-200.327. ICEDC needs to ensure that policy includes the need for suspension and debarment checks to be done prior to entering into a covered transaction. CLA also recommends emphasizing the importance of the procurement standards and established policy to all authorized purchasers within ICEDC. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR Part 200 sections 200.318-327 outline the required general procurement standards, competition, and methods of procurement to be followed. These elements must be incorporated into an organization’s procurement policies and must be followed to ensure procurements are supported and covered transactions are only entered into with entities that are not federally suspended or debarred. Condition: ICEDC’s procurement policy is not in compliance with Uniform Guidance. For the sampled procurement transactions, documentation was not retained for determining that vendors were single source, as required by Uniform Guidance. In addition, documentation was not retained showing selected entities were checked for suspension and debarment prior to entering into the covered transactions. Questioned costs: None. Context: As the ICEDC procurement policy did not specify a micro purchase threshold, CLA tested all procurement transactions charged to the major program that exceeded Uniform Guidance's micro purchase threshold of $10,000 (a total of 3 procurement). The transactions were found to be out of compliance with federal procurement requirements, as documentation was not retained detailing the history of the procurement; determination process of contractors as single source, including the rationale for the method of procurement; determination of contract type; basis for contractor selection; and the basis for the contract price. Documentation should be retained to evidence that an adequate number of quotes were reviewed, that price analysis was performed, and the rationale that a procurement should be considered a noncompetitive procurement. In addition, documentation was not retained showing that the procured vendors were checked for federal suspension and debarment prior to entering into the covered transactions. Cause: Due to improper policy in place and lack of knowledge about federal procurement, suspension and debarment, and documentation requirements. Effect: Noncompliant policies and documentation can lead to selecting vendors that are federally suspended or debarred and could result in procurement of goods and services that are unideal for the federal program. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: CLA recommends ICEDC to update the procurement policy to be compliance in with Uniform Guidance and to include more rigorous documentation as required by 2 CFR sections 200.318-200.327. ICEDC needs to ensure that policy includes the need for suspension and debarment checks to be done prior to entering into a covered transaction. CLA also recommends emphasizing the importance of the procurement standards and established policy to all authorized purchasers within ICEDC. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR Part 200 sections 200.318-327 outline the required general procurement standards, competition, and methods of procurement to be followed. These elements must be incorporated into an organization’s procurement policies and must be followed to ensure procurements are supported and covered transactions are only entered into with entities that are not federally suspended or debarred. Condition: ICEDC’s procurement policy is not in compliance with Uniform Guidance. For the sampled procurement transactions, documentation was not retained for determining that vendors were single source, as required by Uniform Guidance. In addition, documentation was not retained showing selected entities were checked for suspension and debarment prior to entering into the covered transactions. Questioned costs: None. Context: As the ICEDC procurement policy did not specify a micro purchase threshold, CLA tested all procurement transactions charged to the major program that exceeded Uniform Guidance's micro purchase threshold of $10,000 (a total of 3 procurement). The transactions were found to be out of compliance with federal procurement requirements, as documentation was not retained detailing the history of the procurement; determination process of contractors as single source, including the rationale for the method of procurement; determination of contract type; basis for contractor selection; and the basis for the contract price. Documentation should be retained to evidence that an adequate number of quotes were reviewed, that price analysis was performed, and the rationale that a procurement should be considered a noncompetitive procurement. In addition, documentation was not retained showing that the procured vendors were checked for federal suspension and debarment prior to entering into the covered transactions. Cause: Due to improper policy in place and lack of knowledge about federal procurement, suspension and debarment, and documentation requirements. Effect: Noncompliant policies and documentation can lead to selecting vendors that are federally suspended or debarred and could result in procurement of goods and services that are unideal for the federal program. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: CLA recommends ICEDC to update the procurement policy to be compliance in with Uniform Guidance and to include more rigorous documentation as required by 2 CFR sections 200.318-200.327. ICEDC needs to ensure that policy includes the need for suspension and debarment checks to be done prior to entering into a covered transaction. CLA also recommends emphasizing the importance of the procurement standards and established policy to all authorized purchasers within ICEDC. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR Part 200 sections 200.318-327 outline the required general procurement standards, competition, and methods of procurement to be followed. These elements must be incorporated into an organization’s procurement policies and must be followed to ensure procurements are supported and covered transactions are only entered into with entities that are not federally suspended or debarred. Condition: ICEDC’s procurement policy is not in compliance with Uniform Guidance. For the sampled procurement transactions, documentation was not retained for determining that vendors were single source, as required by Uniform Guidance. In addition, documentation was not retained showing selected entities were checked for suspension and debarment prior to entering into the covered transactions. Questioned costs: None. Context: As the ICEDC procurement policy did not specify a micro purchase threshold, CLA tested all procurement transactions charged to the major program that exceeded Uniform Guidance's micro purchase threshold of $10,000 (a total of 3 procurement). The transactions were found to be out of compliance with federal procurement requirements, as documentation was not retained detailing the history of the procurement; determination process of contractors as single source, including the rationale for the method of procurement; determination of contract type; basis for contractor selection; and the basis for the contract price. Documentation should be retained to evidence that an adequate number of quotes were reviewed, that price analysis was performed, and the rationale that a procurement should be considered a noncompetitive procurement. In addition, documentation was not retained showing that the procured vendors were checked for federal suspension and debarment prior to entering into the covered transactions. Cause: Due to improper policy in place and lack of knowledge about federal procurement, suspension and debarment, and documentation requirements. Effect: Noncompliant policies and documentation can lead to selecting vendors that are federally suspended or debarred and could result in procurement of goods and services that are unideal for the federal program. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: CLA recommends ICEDC to update the procurement policy to be compliance in with Uniform Guidance and to include more rigorous documentation as required by 2 CFR sections 200.318-200.327. ICEDC needs to ensure that policy includes the need for suspension and debarment checks to be done prior to entering into a covered transaction. CLA also recommends emphasizing the importance of the procurement standards and established policy to all authorized purchasers within ICEDC. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Procurement Policies and Procedures Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Federal Program Name: COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: ISA-ARPA-ADWR-123022-01 - 2023 Pass-Through Agency: State of Arizona Governor’s Office Pass-Through Number(s): ERMT-20-002 Award Period: January 1, 2023 through January 1, 2026 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria or specific requirement: Under the U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Title 2, Part 200, Uniform Administrative requires certain elements to be part of the District’s procurement standards. The general procurement standards require the District to have and use documented procurement procedures that conform to the procurement standards identified in § 200.317 through 200.327 of the Uniform Guidance. The details of this requirements can be found in Title 2, Part 200, CFR Section 318(a). Condition: During our testing, we noted the District did not have adequate internal controls designed to ensure procurement procedures that conform to Uniform Guidance were followed, or designed to ensure vendors were not suspended or debarred. Questioned costs: None Context: During our testing, it was noted that the District was not following their federal procurement policy #2023-05 to ensure compliance with CFR, Subtitle A Chapter II, Part 200, Subparts D and E when entering into vendor contracts. Also noted the District was not reviewing vendors prior to entering into a contract to ensure the vendor was not on the suspended or debarred vendor list maintained by the General Services Administration. Cause: The District does not have effective internal controls in place to ensure compliance with the Uniform Guidance procurement rules and procedures. Effect: The lack of internal controls over the provisions of procurement, suspension, and debarment compliance requirements provides an opportunity for noncompliance. Repeat Finding: Repeat of prior year finding 2022-001. Recommendation: We recommend the District design controls to ensure an adequate review process is in place to review potential contractors to determine compliance with the Uniform Guidance procurement rules and procedures. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management concurs with the finding, and as reported in the corrective action plan, District policies will be updated and approved to conform to federal guidance.
Finding 2023-001: Procurement Policy and Related Contract Program: 66.958 Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Federal Agency: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Award No: WIFIA-N18147WI Award Year: 2023 This finding is a repeat finding of 2022-001 Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.318 - General Procurement Standards, requires non-Federal entities to have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. Condition: We reviewed the water utility's procurement policy and service contracts with costs reimbursed during 2023, noting they did not contain necessary federal language related to conflicts of interest and debarment and suspension. Cause: The water utility has not received federal funding in the past and did not update their procurement policy when they sought federal funding for the Great Lakes Water Supply project. Additionally, service contracts were entered into prior to receiving federal funds. Effect: Without adequate control of contract language the water utility could enter into contracts related to the Great Lakes Water Supply project that do not qualify for federal reimbursement. Questioned Costs: None noted. Recommendation: We recommend the water utility review its procurement policy and make necessary updates to be in compliance with federal standards. Additionally, we recommend the utility enter into contract addendums related to contracts previously executed without required federal language. Management Response: Waukesha Water utility management has worked closely with WIFIA to craft contracts that include all necessary language prior to releasing RFPs for construction contracts. WIFIA was presented all service contracts to review prior to reimbursements received in fiscal year 2023. The finance department is working to update the procurement policy to ensure necessary federal language is included. The finance department will also work with service contractors to execute contract addendums.
2023 - 003 - Reporting (Material weakness in Internal Controls over Compliance) - Repeated and Modified (Prior Year Finding 2022-002) Federal program information: Funding Agency: Program Title: Federal Assistance Listing Number: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (Follow-up on PY finding) Indian Housing Block Grant 14.867 U.S. Department of Treasury Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds 21.027 Condition: The Governmental Department did not submit their required Federal Financial Reports (SF-425) and Project and Expenditure Report within the required three and one month's respectively after the end of fiscal year. In addition, the reporting package and data collection form for the year ended December 31, 2023, was not filed by the deadline of September 30, 2024, to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse. Criteria: Title 2 CFR 200.327 requires programs to submit financial information to the funding agency using standard financial reporting forms. These reports are to be submitted by the required due date and be accurately completed and supported by the underlying accounting records. In accordance with 2 CFR Section 200.512(a), the audit must be completed and the data collection form and reporting package must be submitted within the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor's report, or nine months after the end of the audit period, adjusted for any extensions permitted by the Office of management and Budget. Cause: The Governmental Department policies were not always followed or controls were not in place to ensure complete and accurate information could be provided timely. Effect: The Governmental Department was not in compliance with federal regulations and guidelines for (SF-425), Project and Expenditure Report and single audit submissions. Auditor's Recommendation: The Governmental Department should implement controls for filing the Federal Financial Reports, (SF- 425), Project and Expenditure Report, and the single audit report in a timely manner. Management’s Response: Due to delays caused by the pandemic, in conjunction with some major turnover in fiscal staff the Tribe fell behind in completing its annual audits, and other required grant reporting. In the first half 2023 the Tribe was able to hire a quarter-time CFO and fill one position in the department. Since the department had staff, they were able to complete the 2022 outstanding audit. The new staff was learning the process of grant reporting and other compliance matters, and at the time of this report have made improvements to implement internal controls to assist with the regulation of all compliance matters. 2022 - 003 - Reporting (Material weakness in Internal Controls over Compliance) - Repeated (Prior Year Finding 2021-003) - Cont'd Estimated Completion Date: March 03, 2025-Due to the newly elected Tribal Administration and restructuring of positions as well as training opportunities for fiscal and the executive committee. Responsible Party: The Tribal Administrator in collaboration with the Cahto Executive Committee is responsible to ensure the Fiscal department, the Department Directors and management are trained and adhere to existing policies and procedures.
2023 - 003 - Reporting (Material weakness in Internal Controls over Compliance) - Repeated and Modified (Prior Year Finding 2022-002) Federal program information: Funding Agency: Program Title: Federal Assistance Listing Number: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (Follow-up on PY finding) Indian Housing Block Grant 14.867 U.S. Department of Treasury Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds 21.027 Condition: The Governmental Department did not submit their required Federal Financial Reports (SF-425) and Project and Expenditure Report within the required three and one month's respectively after the end of fiscal year. In addition, the reporting package and data collection form for the year ended December 31, 2023, was not filed by the deadline of September 30, 2024, to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse. Criteria: Title 2 CFR 200.327 requires programs to submit financial information to the funding agency using standard financial reporting forms. These reports are to be submitted by the required due date and be accurately completed and supported by the underlying accounting records. In accordance with 2 CFR Section 200.512(a), the audit must be completed and the data collection form and reporting package must be submitted within the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor's report, or nine months after the end of the audit period, adjusted for any extensions permitted by the Office of management and Budget. Cause: The Governmental Department policies were not always followed or controls were not in place to ensure complete and accurate information could be provided timely. Effect: The Governmental Department was not in compliance with federal regulations and guidelines for (SF-425), Project and Expenditure Report and single audit submissions. Auditor's Recommendation: The Governmental Department should implement controls for filing the Federal Financial Reports, (SF- 425), Project and Expenditure Report, and the single audit report in a timely manner. Management’s Response: Due to delays caused by the pandemic, in conjunction with some major turnover in fiscal staff the Tribe fell behind in completing its annual audits, and other required grant reporting. In the first half 2023 the Tribe was able to hire a quarter-time CFO and fill one position in the department. Since the department had staff, they were able to complete the 2022 outstanding audit. The new staff was learning the process of grant reporting and other compliance matters, and at the time of this report have made improvements to implement internal controls to assist with the regulation of all compliance matters. 2022 - 003 - Reporting (Material weakness in Internal Controls over Compliance) - Repeated (Prior Year Finding 2021-003) - Cont'd Estimated Completion Date: March 03, 2025-Due to the newly elected Tribal Administration and restructuring of positions as well as training opportunities for fiscal and the executive committee. Responsible Party: The Tribal Administrator in collaboration with the Cahto Executive Committee is responsible to ensure the Fiscal department, the Department Directors and management are trained and adhere to existing policies and procedures.
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Federal Financial Assistance Listing #14.134 Mortgage Insurance Rental Housing Project Number: 091-11022 HUD Regulatory Agreement Dated July 1, 2016 Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria: 2 CRF 200.303(a) establishes that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides assurance that the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The non-Federal entity’s documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in 2 CFR 200.317 through 200.327 which also requires documentation to be retained to detail the history of procurements. In addition, as outlined in 2 CFR 180, recipients must not utilize any vendor which is suspended or debarred or is otherwise excluded from the central contactor registry. Condition: There was one vendor with expenditures in excess of $25,000 and the Project did not verify the vendor against the central contractor registry prior to entering into the transaction or on a periodic basis to ensure that the vendor was not suspended or debarred. Prior to adoption of a procurement policy, management entered into a transaction over the micropurchase threshold with a vendor and documentation was unable to be provided to support procurement compliance for the vendor. Cause: The Project adopted a written procurement policy which conforms to Uniform Guidance during May 2023 and therefore, the Project did not have a policy in place to follow from January through May. Management overlooked the requirement to verify the vendor against the central contractor registry for a vendor. Effect: Inadequate controls over this area of compliance result in a reasonable possibility that the Project would not have the required documentation in place and would not be able to detect and correct noncompliance in a timely manner. Questioned Costs: $23,335 Context/Sampling: A nonstatistical sample of 4 of 8 transactions applicable to procurement requirements were selected for testing, which accounted for $95,590 of $199,971 of transactions. In addition, there was one vendor in which suspension and debarment requirements were applicable and the vendor was tested. Repeat Finding from Prior Year: Yes Recommendation: Management implemented formal procedures over procurement during May 2023 and we recommend management continue following those formal procedures. In addition, we recommend management implement formal procedures over suspension and debarment and retain sufficient documentation to support the process was followed. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding and recommendation.
Assistance Listing Number 66.468 Drinking Water State Revolving Fund United States Environmental Protection Agency North Dakota Public Finance Authority Procurement Suspension & Debarment 2 CFR Part 200.318 Criteria 2 CFR Part 200.318 states that a non-Federal entity must have and use documented procedures, consistent with state, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of 2 CFR part 200.317 through 200.327. Condition District does not have a written procurement policy in place. Cause The District has not approved a written procurement policy. Effect Non-compliance with Procurement Suspension & Debarment compliance requirements. Questioned Costs Not Applicable Repeat Finding See 2022-005. Recommendation We recommend for the board of the District to create and implement a procurement policy that adheres to state and local regulations as well as 2 CFR Part 200.317 through 200.327. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions The District will create and approve a procurement policy that adheres to state and local regulations as well as 2 CFR Part 200.317 through 200.327.
Finding 2023-002: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Identification of federal program: Program Titles: Agriculture Research Basic and Applied Research & Community Economic Adjustment Assistance for Compatible Use and Joint Land Use Studies Assistance Listing Numbers: 10.001 & 12.610 Award Identification: CA 59-8082-0-001 & W9124J2120002 Federal Agencies: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agriculture Research Service & U.S. Department of Defense, Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation Criteria or Specific Requirement: Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. When a non-federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the non-federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. This verification may be accomplished by (1) checking the System for Award Management (SAM) Exclusions maintained by the General Services Administration (GSA) and available at SAM.gov, (2) collecting a certification from the entity, or (3) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that entity (2 CFR section 180.300). Condition: While the Fund adopted an updated procurement policy during 2023, testing of the Fund’s controls on compliance over procurement and suspension and debarment identified transactions under the old policy. The Fund did not have a procurement policy in place for the full year that is in compliance with prescribed standards in the Uniform Guidance; therefore, prior to the adoption of the updated procurement policy, suspension and debarment verifications were not performed prior to entering a covered transaction. Cause: While the Fund adopted an updated procurement policy, including policies over suspension and debarment that fully conforms to Uniform Guidance, the policy was adopted during 2023. Effect: The Fund was not in compliance with the procurement policy requirements of Uniform Guidance, specifically around suspension and debarment for the entirety of 2023. Questioned Costs: None Context: The Fund adopted an updated procurement policy in 2023, which fully complies with Uniform Guidance requirements addressed in Chapter 2 Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards. As the policy was not in place for the full year, we are unable to adequately test compliance prior to the adoption of the new policy. Repeat finding: Yes, Finding 2022-002 Recommendation: We acknowledge the Fund adopted and documented procurement procedures, which conform to the procurement standards identified in 2 CFR section §§ 200.317 through 200.327, and also addressed suspension and debarment during 2023. We recommend management continue training to ensure all applicable personnel are familiar with the revised policy. Views of responsible individuals: Management concurs with and will implement the recommendation. See corrective action plan.
Finding 2023-002: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Identification of federal program: Program Titles: Agriculture Research Basic and Applied Research & Community Economic Adjustment Assistance for Compatible Use and Joint Land Use Studies Assistance Listing Numbers: 10.001 & 12.610 Award Identification: CA 59-8082-0-001 & W9124J2120002 Federal Agencies: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agriculture Research Service & U.S. Department of Defense, Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation Criteria or Specific Requirement: Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. When a non-federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the non-federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. This verification may be accomplished by (1) checking the System for Award Management (SAM) Exclusions maintained by the General Services Administration (GSA) and available at SAM.gov, (2) collecting a certification from the entity, or (3) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that entity (2 CFR section 180.300). Condition: While the Fund adopted an updated procurement policy during 2023, testing of the Fund’s controls on compliance over procurement and suspension and debarment identified transactions under the old policy. The Fund did not have a procurement policy in place for the full year that is in compliance with prescribed standards in the Uniform Guidance; therefore, prior to the adoption of the updated procurement policy, suspension and debarment verifications were not performed prior to entering a covered transaction. Cause: While the Fund adopted an updated procurement policy, including policies over suspension and debarment that fully conforms to Uniform Guidance, the policy was adopted during 2023. Effect: The Fund was not in compliance with the procurement policy requirements of Uniform Guidance, specifically around suspension and debarment for the entirety of 2023. Questioned Costs: None Context: The Fund adopted an updated procurement policy in 2023, which fully complies with Uniform Guidance requirements addressed in Chapter 2 Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards. As the policy was not in place for the full year, we are unable to adequately test compliance prior to the adoption of the new policy. Repeat finding: Yes, Finding 2022-002 Recommendation: We acknowledge the Fund adopted and documented procurement procedures, which conform to the procurement standards identified in 2 CFR section §§ 200.317 through 200.327, and also addressed suspension and debarment during 2023. We recommend management continue training to ensure all applicable personnel are familiar with the revised policy. Views of responsible individuals: Management concurs with and will implement the recommendation. See corrective action plan.
Department of Transportation Federal Financial Assistance Listing 20.106; Awards AIP3‐46‐0050‐54, AIP3‐46‐0050‐59, AIP3‐46‐0050‐60, and AIP3‐46‐0050‐62. COVID‐19 Airport Improvement Program Reporting Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria ‐ 2 CFR 200.303(a) establishes that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal controls over the federal awards that provide assurance that the entity is managing the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the conditions of the federal award. 2 CFR 200.327 and 2 CFR 200.328 require the auditee to collect financial information and monitor its activities under federal awards to assure compliance with applicable federal requirements and performance expectations are being achieved and report these items in accordance with the program requirements. Condition ‐ The SF‐425 annual report dated September 30, 2023, for award AIP3‐46‐0050‐54 underreported the federal share of expenditures by $80,133, while the FAA Form 5100‐127 annual report dated December 31, 2022, for all awards underreported the externally restricted assets by $397,646. Cause ‐ The Authority does not have an internal control structure designed to ensure amounts reported on SF‐425 and FAA Form 5100‐127 reports are adequately reviewed and agree to underlying accounting records. Effect ‐ Lack of compliance with designed internal controls over reporting could result in the Authority reporting incorrect or incomplete information. Questioned Costs ‐ None reported. Context/Sampling ‐ A nonstatistical sample of 10 reports out of 31 reports. Repeat Finding from Prior Year – Yes, prior year finding 2022‐002 Recommendation ‐ Management should determine and formalize reporting responsibilities between the Airport and the State and establish review processes to ensure that amounts included in SF‐425 and FAA Form 5100‐127 reports agree with the underlying accounting records. Views of Responsible Officials ‐ Management agrees with the finding.
Department of Transportation Federal Financial Assistance Listing 20.106; Awards AIP3‐46‐0050‐54, AIP3‐46‐0050‐59, AIP3‐46‐0050‐60, and AIP3‐46‐0050‐62. COVID‐19 Airport Improvement Program Reporting Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria ‐ 2 CFR 200.303(a) establishes that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal controls over the federal awards that provide assurance that the entity is managing the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the conditions of the federal award. 2 CFR 200.327 and 2 CFR 200.328 require the auditee to collect financial information and monitor its activities under federal awards to assure compliance with applicable federal requirements and performance expectations are being achieved and report these items in accordance with the program requirements. Condition ‐ The SF‐425 annual report dated September 30, 2023, for award AIP3‐46‐0050‐54 underreported the federal share of expenditures by $80,133, while the FAA Form 5100‐127 annual report dated December 31, 2022, for all awards underreported the externally restricted assets by $397,646. Cause ‐ The Authority does not have an internal control structure designed to ensure amounts reported on SF‐425 and FAA Form 5100‐127 reports are adequately reviewed and agree to underlying accounting records. Effect ‐ Lack of compliance with designed internal controls over reporting could result in the Authority reporting incorrect or incomplete information. Questioned Costs ‐ None reported. Context/Sampling ‐ A nonstatistical sample of 10 reports out of 31 reports. Repeat Finding from Prior Year – Yes, prior year finding 2022‐002 Recommendation ‐ Management should determine and formalize reporting responsibilities between the Airport and the State and establish review processes to ensure that amounts included in SF‐425 and FAA Form 5100‐127 reports agree with the underlying accounting records. Views of Responsible Officials ‐ Management agrees with the finding.
Department of Transportation Federal Financial Assistance Listing 20.106; Awards AIP3‐46‐0050‐54, AIP3‐46‐0050‐59, AIP3‐46‐0050‐60, and AIP3‐46‐0050‐62. COVID‐19 Airport Improvement Program Reporting Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria ‐ 2 CFR 200.303(a) establishes that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal controls over the federal awards that provide assurance that the entity is managing the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the conditions of the federal award. 2 CFR 200.327 and 2 CFR 200.328 require the auditee to collect financial information and monitor its activities under federal awards to assure compliance with applicable federal requirements and performance expectations are being achieved and report these items in accordance with the program requirements. Condition ‐ The SF‐425 annual report dated September 30, 2023, for award AIP3‐46‐0050‐54 underreported the federal share of expenditures by $80,133, while the FAA Form 5100‐127 annual report dated December 31, 2022, for all awards underreported the externally restricted assets by $397,646. Cause ‐ The Authority does not have an internal control structure designed to ensure amounts reported on SF‐425 and FAA Form 5100‐127 reports are adequately reviewed and agree to underlying accounting records. Effect ‐ Lack of compliance with designed internal controls over reporting could result in the Authority reporting incorrect or incomplete information. Questioned Costs ‐ None reported. Context/Sampling ‐ A nonstatistical sample of 10 reports out of 31 reports. Repeat Finding from Prior Year – Yes, prior year finding 2022‐002 Recommendation ‐ Management should determine and formalize reporting responsibilities between the Airport and the State and establish review processes to ensure that amounts included in SF‐425 and FAA Form 5100‐127 reports agree with the underlying accounting records. Views of Responsible Officials ‐ Management agrees with the finding.
Department of Transportation Federal Financial Assistance Listing 20.106; Awards AIP3‐46‐0050‐54, AIP3‐46‐0050‐59, AIP3‐46‐0050‐60, and AIP3‐46‐0050‐62. COVID‐19 Airport Improvement Program Reporting Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria ‐ 2 CFR 200.303(a) establishes that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal controls over the federal awards that provide assurance that the entity is managing the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the conditions of the federal award. 2 CFR 200.327 and 2 CFR 200.328 require the auditee to collect financial information and monitor its activities under federal awards to assure compliance with applicable federal requirements and performance expectations are being achieved and report these items in accordance with the program requirements. Condition ‐ The SF‐425 annual report dated September 30, 2023, for award AIP3‐46‐0050‐54 underreported the federal share of expenditures by $80,133, while the FAA Form 5100‐127 annual report dated December 31, 2022, for all awards underreported the externally restricted assets by $397,646. Cause ‐ The Authority does not have an internal control structure designed to ensure amounts reported on SF‐425 and FAA Form 5100‐127 reports are adequately reviewed and agree to underlying accounting records. Effect ‐ Lack of compliance with designed internal controls over reporting could result in the Authority reporting incorrect or incomplete information. Questioned Costs ‐ None reported. Context/Sampling ‐ A nonstatistical sample of 10 reports out of 31 reports. Repeat Finding from Prior Year – Yes, prior year finding 2022‐002 Recommendation ‐ Management should determine and formalize reporting responsibilities between the Airport and the State and establish review processes to ensure that amounts included in SF‐425 and FAA Form 5100‐127 reports agree with the underlying accounting records. Views of Responsible Officials ‐ Management agrees with the finding.
Finding # 2023-002 Type: Immaterial noncompliance over procurement Assistance Listing: 10.937 Partnerships for Climate-Smart Commodities Criteria/Requirement The Organization’s procurement policies should incorporate the provisions of the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.327. Cause: The Organization’s fiscal policies and procedures do not meet the required federal standards for procurement. Effect: Executed contracts using federal funds may be in violation of federal guidelines. Questioned Costs: None. Recommendation: The Organization's procurement policy must have documented procurement procedures, consistent with state, local, and tribal laws and regulations for the acquisition of property or services required under a federal award or subaward. The Organization should maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. Management’s Response: The Organization agrees with the auditor’s recommendation. At the time of this audit’s issuance, the Organization has updated its procurement policies and procedures to be consistent with federal requirements.
Finding # 2023-002 Type: Immaterial noncompliance over procurement Assistance Listing: 10.937 Partnerships for Climate-Smart Commodities Criteria/Requirement The Organization’s procurement policies should incorporate the provisions of the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.327. Cause: The Organization’s fiscal policies and procedures do not meet the required federal standards for procurement. Effect: Executed contracts using federal funds may be in violation of federal guidelines. Questioned Costs: None. Recommendation: The Organization's procurement policy must have documented procurement procedures, consistent with state, local, and tribal laws and regulations for the acquisition of property or services required under a federal award or subaward. The Organization should maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. Management’s Response: The Organization agrees with the auditor’s recommendation. At the time of this audit’s issuance, the Organization has updated its procurement policies and procedures to be consistent with federal requirements.
Criteria: Under the Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) requires certain elements to be part of the District's procurement standards. The general procurement standards require the District to have and use documented procurement procedures that conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327 of the Uniform Guidance. The details of these requirements can be found in Title 2, Part 200, CFR Section 318(a). The procurement standard also requires written documentation including criteria for when sole source solicitation may be used. The District's written sole source policy does not state that sole source may be used in a public emergency; when a pass-through entity expressly authorizes; or after solicitation of more than one, competition is determined inadequate. The details of these requirements can be found in 2 CFR Section 320(c)(2). Please refer to URL https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-2/subtitle-A/chapter-II/part- 200#200.320. Condition/Context: The District has not formally updated their procurement policies to include the thresholds and policies required by the federal government uniform guidance Title 2, Part 200, 2 CFR Section 320 on competitive bidding. Additionally, procurement procedures, specifically required by the federal government for use in sole source solicitations, were not performed for expenses using federal awards. Effect: Major federal programs tested required procurement policies and specific competitive bidding procedures to comply with the use of awarded federal funds to the District. As of the date of this report, the District is not in compliance with those requirements. Cause: The District had not formally amended their procurement policies to conform to the federal procurement policies before spending federal funds. Additionally, the District uses a third-party grant manager (Electrical District #3, Pinal County Arizona) to perform competitive procurement on the District's behalf, in which all federal funds reimburse Electrical District #3 who had paid the vendor awarded the work through competitive means. The third-party grant manager was not awarded in conformity with sole source requirements. Recommendation: We recommend that management formally adopt amendments to their existing procurement policies to conform with U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 2, Part 200, Uniform Administrative Guidance CFR Section 318(a). Additionally, we recommend management perform competitive procurement on all purchases made with federal funds and pay all vendors awarded directly from the District and not through a third-party conduit grant manager. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Management concurs with the finding, see corrective action plan.
Finding Number: 2023-001 Repeat Finding: No Program Name / Title: Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children and Grants for Capital Development in Health Centers Federal Assistance Listing Number: 10.557 and 93.526 Federal Agencies: United States Department of Agriculture and and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Award Number: 22-10305 and C8ECS44546 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Questioned Cost: No Criteria: Under 2 CFR sections 180.220 and 200.318 through 200.326, 45 CFR 75.327 through 75.334 and 45 CFR 75 Part E, the Organization is required to implement certain written Procurement and Suspension and Debarment policies and procedures that adhere to the minimum Federal Procurement standards. The Organization must use its own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable State and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal statutes and the procurement requirements outlined in Uniform Guidance and maintain sufficient records to detail the history of procurements. Condition: Although the Organization maintained a written procurement policy, the Organization did not have adequate procurement policies in place to meet the minimum federal requirements for procurement standards and did not always follow its own procurement policies. Cause: The Organization's policy did not meet all of the minimum federal requirements under Uniform Guidance. In addition, the Organization could not provide support to demonstrate that it performed all of the necessary procurement steps and did not always retain documentation demonstrating compliance with Uniform Guidance for purchases made with federal funds. Effect: The Organization was not in compliance with federal regulations or its own policies. Recommendation: The Organization should update their procurement policy to meet the minimum federal requirements and ensure procurement policies are being followed for all procurement levels with written documentation. View of Responsible Officials: Introduction United Health Centers of the San Joaquin Valley (the "Organization") vigorously protests this finding. The Organization rigorously complies with not only federal and state procurement regulations, but also WIC regulations and the requirements found in the contract between the Organization and WIC. Additionally, numerous audits have been conducted by various entities (including audits by both WIC and the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA)) without any findings related to the Organization’s procurement. Finally, the Organization trains all individuals participating in the procurement process and provides guidance on procurement rules. Compliance with Regulations and WIC Program Contract The Organization’s compliance efforts are top tier. It uses many checks and balances to ensure compliance across the board with not only federal and state procurement regulations, but also WIC regulations and the requirements found in the contract between the Organization and WIC. It maintains written standards of conduct covering conflicts of interest and governing the actions of its employees engaged in the selection, award and administration of contracts, intentionally avoids acquisition of unnecessary or duplicative items and uses surplus items instead of purchasing items when feasible. It uses full and open competition and obtains prior written authorization from the appropriate CDPH Program Contract Manager as required. The Organization maintains a narrative description of the procurement system, guidelines, rules, or regulations that is used to make purchases, which is audited by WIC for compliance. The Organization’s contract with WIC even goes above and beyond the requirements of 2 CFR § 180.220 and §§ 200.318 through 200.327. For example, the contract requires the reporting, tagging and annual inventorying of all equipment and/or property that is furnished by CDPH or purchased/reimbursed with funds provided through the contract. Upon receipt of equipment and/or property, the Organization reports the receipt to the CDPH Program Contract Manager and receives property tags for the items, then tags and logs them. For all purchases, the Organization maintains copies of all paid vendor invoices, documents, bids and other information used in vendor selection, for inspection or audit. Justifications supporting the absence of bidding (i.e., sole source purchases) are also maintained on file by the Organization for inspection or audit. Finally, although training is not required under 2 CFR § 180.220 or §§ 200.318 through 200.327, the Organization trains all pertinent staff related to procurement, the Organization’s procurement policies and procedures, the WIC contract requirements, WIC’s regulations and Uniform Guidance. This is done to ensure compliance with the principles and requirements of each of these requirements. No Prior Audit Findings Most recently, in January 2024 the Organization’s procurement policies and procedures were comprehensively audited by the federal HRSA through an Operational Site Visit to verify the status of UHC’s compliance with the relevant statutory and regulatory requirements. The HRSA audit specifically reviewed the Organization’s procurement policies and procedures, as well as reviewed documentation related to procurements during the prior three years by evaluating ten elements. This assessment evaluated written procurement procedures to ensure compliance with federal procurement standards, including a process for ensuring that all procurement costs are allowable, consistent with federal cost principles found in 45 CFR 75 Subpart E: Cost Principles. Additionally, the audit reviewed records for procurement actions paid for in whole or in part under the federal award that include the rationale for method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. This review involved documentation related to noncompetitive procurements. The audit also included evaluating the Organization’s retention of final contracts and related procurement records, consistent with federal document maintenance requirements, for procurement actions paid for in whole or in part under the federal award. Another element of the audit was to ensure that all activities and reporting requirements are being carried out in accordance with the provisions and timelines of the related contract and UHC’s own policies and procedures. Following completion of the expansive audit, HRSA’s evaluation resulted in no findings related to procurement. UHC successfully met all six elements of the Operational Site Visit audit conducted by HRSA. Conclusion In conclusion, the Organization vehemently disputes the findings presented, underscoring its unwavering commitment to stringent compliance with federal and state procurement regulations, as well as the stipulations outlined in its contract with WIC. The Organization's robust compliance mechanisms, encompassing meticulous checks and balances, written standards of conduct, and adherence to full and open competition, exemplify its dedication to procurement integrity. Furthermore, the Organization's proactive measures, such as reporting, tagging, and inventorying equipment, surpass the mandated requirements, ensuring transparency and accountability. Notably, recent audits by both WIC and the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) have yielded no findings pertaining to procurement, validating the efficacy of the Organization's practices. The Organization's unwavering commitment to compliance, coupled with its comprehensive procurement protocols and ongoing training efforts, unequivocally refute any assertions of impropriety. UHC will reevaluate the audit findings and may or may not adopt a Corrective Action Plan.
Finding Number: 2023-001 Repeat Finding: No Program Name / Title: Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children and Grants for Capital Development in Health Centers Federal Assistance Listing Number: 10.557 and 93.526 Federal Agencies: United States Department of Agriculture and and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Award Number: 22-10305 and C8ECS44546 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Questioned Cost: No Criteria: Under 2 CFR sections 180.220 and 200.318 through 200.326, 45 CFR 75.327 through 75.334 and 45 CFR 75 Part E, the Organization is required to implement certain written Procurement and Suspension and Debarment policies and procedures that adhere to the minimum Federal Procurement standards. The Organization must use its own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable State and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal statutes and the procurement requirements outlined in Uniform Guidance and maintain sufficient records to detail the history of procurements. Condition: Although the Organization maintained a written procurement policy, the Organization did not have adequate procurement policies in place to meet the minimum federal requirements for procurement standards and did not always follow its own procurement policies. Cause: The Organization's policy did not meet all of the minimum federal requirements under Uniform Guidance. In addition, the Organization could not provide support to demonstrate that it performed all of the necessary procurement steps and did not always retain documentation demonstrating compliance with Uniform Guidance for purchases made with federal funds. Effect: The Organization was not in compliance with federal regulations or its own policies. Recommendation: The Organization should update their procurement policy to meet the minimum federal requirements and ensure procurement policies are being followed for all procurement levels with written documentation. View of Responsible Officials: Introduction United Health Centers of the San Joaquin Valley (the "Organization") vigorously protests this finding. The Organization rigorously complies with not only federal and state procurement regulations, but also WIC regulations and the requirements found in the contract between the Organization and WIC. Additionally, numerous audits have been conducted by various entities (including audits by both WIC and the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA)) without any findings related to the Organization’s procurement. Finally, the Organization trains all individuals participating in the procurement process and provides guidance on procurement rules. Compliance with Regulations and WIC Program Contract The Organization’s compliance efforts are top tier. It uses many checks and balances to ensure compliance across the board with not only federal and state procurement regulations, but also WIC regulations and the requirements found in the contract between the Organization and WIC. It maintains written standards of conduct covering conflicts of interest and governing the actions of its employees engaged in the selection, award and administration of contracts, intentionally avoids acquisition of unnecessary or duplicative items and uses surplus items instead of purchasing items when feasible. It uses full and open competition and obtains prior written authorization from the appropriate CDPH Program Contract Manager as required. The Organization maintains a narrative description of the procurement system, guidelines, rules, or regulations that is used to make purchases, which is audited by WIC for compliance. The Organization’s contract with WIC even goes above and beyond the requirements of 2 CFR § 180.220 and §§ 200.318 through 200.327. For example, the contract requires the reporting, tagging and annual inventorying of all equipment and/or property that is furnished by CDPH or purchased/reimbursed with funds provided through the contract. Upon receipt of equipment and/or property, the Organization reports the receipt to the CDPH Program Contract Manager and receives property tags for the items, then tags and logs them. For all purchases, the Organization maintains copies of all paid vendor invoices, documents, bids and other information used in vendor selection, for inspection or audit. Justifications supporting the absence of bidding (i.e., sole source purchases) are also maintained on file by the Organization for inspection or audit. Finally, although training is not required under 2 CFR § 180.220 or §§ 200.318 through 200.327, the Organization trains all pertinent staff related to procurement, the Organization’s procurement policies and procedures, the WIC contract requirements, WIC’s regulations and Uniform Guidance. This is done to ensure compliance with the principles and requirements of each of these requirements. No Prior Audit Findings Most recently, in January 2024 the Organization’s procurement policies and procedures were comprehensively audited by the federal HRSA through an Operational Site Visit to verify the status of UHC’s compliance with the relevant statutory and regulatory requirements. The HRSA audit specifically reviewed the Organization’s procurement policies and procedures, as well as reviewed documentation related to procurements during the prior three years by evaluating ten elements. This assessment evaluated written procurement procedures to ensure compliance with federal procurement standards, including a process for ensuring that all procurement costs are allowable, consistent with federal cost principles found in 45 CFR 75 Subpart E: Cost Principles. Additionally, the audit reviewed records for procurement actions paid for in whole or in part under the federal award that include the rationale for method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. This review involved documentation related to noncompetitive procurements. The audit also included evaluating the Organization’s retention of final contracts and related procurement records, consistent with federal document maintenance requirements, for procurement actions paid for in whole or in part under the federal award. Another element of the audit was to ensure that all activities and reporting requirements are being carried out in accordance with the provisions and timelines of the related contract and UHC’s own policies and procedures. Following completion of the expansive audit, HRSA’s evaluation resulted in no findings related to procurement. UHC successfully met all six elements of the Operational Site Visit audit conducted by HRSA. Conclusion In conclusion, the Organization vehemently disputes the findings presented, underscoring its unwavering commitment to stringent compliance with federal and state procurement regulations, as well as the stipulations outlined in its contract with WIC. The Organization's robust compliance mechanisms, encompassing meticulous checks and balances, written standards of conduct, and adherence to full and open competition, exemplify its dedication to procurement integrity. Furthermore, the Organization's proactive measures, such as reporting, tagging, and inventorying equipment, surpass the mandated requirements, ensuring transparency and accountability. Notably, recent audits by both WIC and the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) have yielded no findings pertaining to procurement, validating the efficacy of the Organization's practices. The Organization's unwavering commitment to compliance, coupled with its comprehensive procurement protocols and ongoing training efforts, unequivocally refute any assertions of impropriety. UHC will reevaluate the audit findings and may or may not adopt a Corrective Action Plan.