Finding: Special Tests - Wage Rate Requirements Federal Program: Airport Improvement Program Assistance Listing Number: 20.106 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Transportation Pass-Through Entity: Not Applicable Criteria: All laborers and mechanics employed by contractors or subcontractors to work on construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by Federal assistance funds must be paid wages not less than those established for the locality of the project (prevailing wage rates) by the Department of Labor (DOL) (40 USC 3141?3144, 3146, and 3147). Non-Federal entities shall include in their construction contracts subject to the Wage Rate Requirements (which still may be referenced as the Davis-Bacon Act) a provision that the contractor or subcontractor comply with those requirements and the DOL regulations. This includes a requirement for the contractor or subcontractor to submit to the Non-Federal entity weekly, for each week in which any contract work is performed, a copy of the payroll and a statement of compliance (certified payrolls). (29 CFR sections 5.5 and 5.6; the A-102 Common Rule (section 36(i)(5)); OMB Circular A-110 (2 CFR Part 215, Appendix A, Contract Provisions); 2 CFR Part 176, Subpart C; and 2 CFR section 200.326). In addition, according to 2 CFR Part 200.303, the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition: The City did not obtain all of the required certified payrolls for contractor or subcontractor work performed during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2022. In addition, the City did not have internal controls in place to identify that these certified payrolls were not being obtained. Questioned Costs: Unknown Context: The City did not obtain any certified payrolls for contractor or subcontractor work performed from one of the two construction contractors used for the projects for this program. This one contractor accounted for 94 percent of the construction expenditures during fiscal year 2022. Effect: Certified payrolls were not obtained or reviewed for the project so laborers and mechanics employed by contractors or subcontractors may not have been paid prevailing wage rates. Cause: The City did not ensure that all required certified payrolls were being obtained. There was no one person or group assigned to monitor, review, and obtain certified payrolls during the year from contractors and subcontractors. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Not applicable. Recommendation: We recommend that the City design and implement internal controls to ensure compliance with the program?s wage rates requirements. These controls should include monitoring construction contracts, tracking weekly certified payrolls or notification of no work performed, and reviewing to ensure that the payrolls are properly certified for all contractor and subcontractor work performed. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan
Finding: Special Tests - Wage Rate Requirements Federal Program: Airport Improvement Program Assistance Listing Number: 20.106 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Transportation Pass-Through Entity: Not Applicable Criteria: All laborers and mechanics employed by contractors or subcontractors to work on construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by Federal assistance funds must be paid wages not less than those established for the locality of the project (prevailing wage rates) by the Department of Labor (DOL) (40 USC 3141?3144, 3146, and 3147). Non-Federal entities shall include in their construction contracts subject to the Wage Rate Requirements (which still may be referenced as the Davis-Bacon Act) a provision that the contractor or subcontractor comply with those requirements and the DOL regulations. This includes a requirement for the contractor or subcontractor to submit to the Non-Federal entity weekly, for each week in which any contract work is performed, a copy of the payroll and a statement of compliance (certified payrolls). (29 CFR sections 5.5 and 5.6; the A-102 Common Rule (section 36(i)(5)); OMB Circular A-110 (2 CFR Part 215, Appendix A, Contract Provisions); 2 CFR Part 176, Subpart C; and 2 CFR section 200.326). In addition, according to 2 CFR Part 200.303, the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition: The City did not obtain all of the required certified payrolls for contractor or subcontractor work performed during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2022. In addition, the City did not have internal controls in place to identify that these certified payrolls were not being obtained. Questioned Costs: Unknown Context: The City did not obtain any certified payrolls for contractor or subcontractor work performed from one of the two construction contractors used for the projects for this program. This one contractor accounted for 94 percent of the construction expenditures during fiscal year 2022. Effect: Certified payrolls were not obtained or reviewed for the project so laborers and mechanics employed by contractors or subcontractors may not have been paid prevailing wage rates. Cause: The City did not ensure that all required certified payrolls were being obtained. There was no one person or group assigned to monitor, review, and obtain certified payrolls during the year from contractors and subcontractors. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Not applicable. Recommendation: We recommend that the City design and implement internal controls to ensure compliance with the program?s wage rates requirements. These controls should include monitoring construction contracts, tracking weekly certified payrolls or notification of no work performed, and reviewing to ensure that the payrolls are properly certified for all contractor and subcontractor work performed. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan
Finding: Special Tests - Wage Rate Requirements Federal Program: Airport Improvement Program Assistance Listing Number: 20.106 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Transportation Pass-Through Entity: Not Applicable Criteria: All laborers and mechanics employed by contractors or subcontractors to work on construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by Federal assistance funds must be paid wages not less than those established for the locality of the project (prevailing wage rates) by the Department of Labor (DOL) (40 USC 3141?3144, 3146, and 3147). Non-Federal entities shall include in their construction contracts subject to the Wage Rate Requirements (which still may be referenced as the Davis-Bacon Act) a provision that the contractor or subcontractor comply with those requirements and the DOL regulations. This includes a requirement for the contractor or subcontractor to submit to the Non-Federal entity weekly, for each week in which any contract work is performed, a copy of the payroll and a statement of compliance (certified payrolls). (29 CFR sections 5.5 and 5.6; the A-102 Common Rule (section 36(i)(5)); OMB Circular A-110 (2 CFR Part 215, Appendix A, Contract Provisions); 2 CFR Part 176, Subpart C; and 2 CFR section 200.326). In addition, according to 2 CFR Part 200.303, the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition: The City did not obtain all of the required certified payrolls for contractor or subcontractor work performed during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2022. In addition, the City did not have internal controls in place to identify that these certified payrolls were not being obtained. Questioned Costs: Unknown Context: The City did not obtain any certified payrolls for contractor or subcontractor work performed from one of the two construction contractors used for the projects for this program. This one contractor accounted for 94 percent of the construction expenditures during fiscal year 2022. Effect: Certified payrolls were not obtained or reviewed for the project so laborers and mechanics employed by contractors or subcontractors may not have been paid prevailing wage rates. Cause: The City did not ensure that all required certified payrolls were being obtained. There was no one person or group assigned to monitor, review, and obtain certified payrolls during the year from contractors and subcontractors. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Not applicable. Recommendation: We recommend that the City design and implement internal controls to ensure compliance with the program?s wage rates requirements. These controls should include monitoring construction contracts, tracking weekly certified payrolls or notification of no work performed, and reviewing to ensure that the payrolls are properly certified for all contractor and subcontractor work performed. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan
Finding: Special Tests - Wage Rate Requirements Federal Program: Airport Improvement Program Assistance Listing Number: 20.106 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Transportation Pass-Through Entity: Not Applicable Criteria: All laborers and mechanics employed by contractors or subcontractors to work on construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by Federal assistance funds must be paid wages not less than those established for the locality of the project (prevailing wage rates) by the Department of Labor (DOL) (40 USC 3141?3144, 3146, and 3147). Non-Federal entities shall include in their construction contracts subject to the Wage Rate Requirements (which still may be referenced as the Davis-Bacon Act) a provision that the contractor or subcontractor comply with those requirements and the DOL regulations. This includes a requirement for the contractor or subcontractor to submit to the Non-Federal entity weekly, for each week in which any contract work is performed, a copy of the payroll and a statement of compliance (certified payrolls). (29 CFR sections 5.5 and 5.6; the A-102 Common Rule (section 36(i)(5)); OMB Circular A-110 (2 CFR Part 215, Appendix A, Contract Provisions); 2 CFR Part 176, Subpart C; and 2 CFR section 200.326). In addition, according to 2 CFR Part 200.303, the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition: The City did not obtain all of the required certified payrolls for contractor or subcontractor work performed during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2022. In addition, the City did not have internal controls in place to identify that these certified payrolls were not being obtained. Questioned Costs: Unknown Context: The City did not obtain any certified payrolls for contractor or subcontractor work performed from one of the two construction contractors used for the projects for this program. This one contractor accounted for 94 percent of the construction expenditures during fiscal year 2022. Effect: Certified payrolls were not obtained or reviewed for the project so laborers and mechanics employed by contractors or subcontractors may not have been paid prevailing wage rates. Cause: The City did not ensure that all required certified payrolls were being obtained. There was no one person or group assigned to monitor, review, and obtain certified payrolls during the year from contractors and subcontractors. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Not applicable. Recommendation: We recommend that the City design and implement internal controls to ensure compliance with the program?s wage rates requirements. These controls should include monitoring construction contracts, tracking weekly certified payrolls or notification of no work performed, and reviewing to ensure that the payrolls are properly certified for all contractor and subcontractor work performed. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan
Finding: Special Tests - Wage Rate Requirements Federal Program: Airport Improvement Program Assistance Listing Number: 20.106 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Transportation Pass-Through Entity: Not Applicable Criteria: All laborers and mechanics employed by contractors or subcontractors to work on construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by Federal assistance funds must be paid wages not less than those established for the locality of the project (prevailing wage rates) by the Department of Labor (DOL) (40 USC 3141?3144, 3146, and 3147). Non-Federal entities shall include in their construction contracts subject to the Wage Rate Requirements (which still may be referenced as the Davis-Bacon Act) a provision that the contractor or subcontractor comply with those requirements and the DOL regulations. This includes a requirement for the contractor or subcontractor to submit to the Non-Federal entity weekly, for each week in which any contract work is performed, a copy of the payroll and a statement of compliance (certified payrolls). (29 CFR sections 5.5 and 5.6; the A-102 Common Rule (section 36(i)(5)); OMB Circular A-110 (2 CFR Part 215, Appendix A, Contract Provisions); 2 CFR Part 176, Subpart C; and 2 CFR section 200.326). In addition, according to 2 CFR Part 200.303, the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition: The City did not obtain all of the required certified payrolls for contractor or subcontractor work performed during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2022. In addition, the City did not have internal controls in place to identify that these certified payrolls were not being obtained. Questioned Costs: Unknown Context: The City did not obtain any certified payrolls for contractor or subcontractor work performed from one of the two construction contractors used for the projects for this program. This one contractor accounted for 94 percent of the construction expenditures during fiscal year 2022. Effect: Certified payrolls were not obtained or reviewed for the project so laborers and mechanics employed by contractors or subcontractors may not have been paid prevailing wage rates. Cause: The City did not ensure that all required certified payrolls were being obtained. There was no one person or group assigned to monitor, review, and obtain certified payrolls during the year from contractors and subcontractors. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Not applicable. Recommendation: We recommend that the City design and implement internal controls to ensure compliance with the program?s wage rates requirements. These controls should include monitoring construction contracts, tracking weekly certified payrolls or notification of no work performed, and reviewing to ensure that the payrolls are properly certified for all contractor and subcontractor work performed. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan
Finding: Special Tests - Wage Rate Requirements Federal Program: Airport Improvement Program Assistance Listing Number: 20.106 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Transportation Pass-Through Entity: Not Applicable Criteria: All laborers and mechanics employed by contractors or subcontractors to work on construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by Federal assistance funds must be paid wages not less than those established for the locality of the project (prevailing wage rates) by the Department of Labor (DOL) (40 USC 3141?3144, 3146, and 3147). Non-Federal entities shall include in their construction contracts subject to the Wage Rate Requirements (which still may be referenced as the Davis-Bacon Act) a provision that the contractor or subcontractor comply with those requirements and the DOL regulations. This includes a requirement for the contractor or subcontractor to submit to the Non-Federal entity weekly, for each week in which any contract work is performed, a copy of the payroll and a statement of compliance (certified payrolls). (29 CFR sections 5.5 and 5.6; the A-102 Common Rule (section 36(i)(5)); OMB Circular A-110 (2 CFR Part 215, Appendix A, Contract Provisions); 2 CFR Part 176, Subpart C; and 2 CFR section 200.326). In addition, according to 2 CFR Part 200.303, the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition: The City did not obtain all of the required certified payrolls for contractor or subcontractor work performed during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2022. In addition, the City did not have internal controls in place to identify that these certified payrolls were not being obtained. Questioned Costs: Unknown Context: The City did not obtain any certified payrolls for contractor or subcontractor work performed from one of the two construction contractors used for the projects for this program. This one contractor accounted for 94 percent of the construction expenditures during fiscal year 2022. Effect: Certified payrolls were not obtained or reviewed for the project so laborers and mechanics employed by contractors or subcontractors may not have been paid prevailing wage rates. Cause: The City did not ensure that all required certified payrolls were being obtained. There was no one person or group assigned to monitor, review, and obtain certified payrolls during the year from contractors and subcontractors. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Not applicable. Recommendation: We recommend that the City design and implement internal controls to ensure compliance with the program?s wage rates requirements. These controls should include monitoring construction contracts, tracking weekly certified payrolls or notification of no work performed, and reviewing to ensure that the payrolls are properly certified for all contractor and subcontractor work performed. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan
Finding: Special Tests - Wage Rate Requirements Federal Program: Airport Improvement Program Assistance Listing Number: 20.106 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Transportation Pass-Through Entity: Not Applicable Criteria: All laborers and mechanics employed by contractors or subcontractors to work on construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by Federal assistance funds must be paid wages not less than those established for the locality of the project (prevailing wage rates) by the Department of Labor (DOL) (40 USC 3141?3144, 3146, and 3147). Non-Federal entities shall include in their construction contracts subject to the Wage Rate Requirements (which still may be referenced as the Davis-Bacon Act) a provision that the contractor or subcontractor comply with those requirements and the DOL regulations. This includes a requirement for the contractor or subcontractor to submit to the Non-Federal entity weekly, for each week in which any contract work is performed, a copy of the payroll and a statement of compliance (certified payrolls). (29 CFR sections 5.5 and 5.6; the A-102 Common Rule (section 36(i)(5)); OMB Circular A-110 (2 CFR Part 215, Appendix A, Contract Provisions); 2 CFR Part 176, Subpart C; and 2 CFR section 200.326). In addition, according to 2 CFR Part 200.303, the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition: The City did not obtain all of the required certified payrolls for contractor or subcontractor work performed during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2022. In addition, the City did not have internal controls in place to identify that these certified payrolls were not being obtained. Questioned Costs: Unknown Context: The City did not obtain any certified payrolls for contractor or subcontractor work performed from one of the two construction contractors used for the projects for this program. This one contractor accounted for 94 percent of the construction expenditures during fiscal year 2022. Effect: Certified payrolls were not obtained or reviewed for the project so laborers and mechanics employed by contractors or subcontractors may not have been paid prevailing wage rates. Cause: The City did not ensure that all required certified payrolls were being obtained. There was no one person or group assigned to monitor, review, and obtain certified payrolls during the year from contractors and subcontractors. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Not applicable. Recommendation: We recommend that the City design and implement internal controls to ensure compliance with the program?s wage rates requirements. These controls should include monitoring construction contracts, tracking weekly certified payrolls or notification of no work performed, and reviewing to ensure that the payrolls are properly certified for all contractor and subcontractor work performed. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan
Finding: Special Tests - Wage Rate Requirements Federal Program: Airport Improvement Program Assistance Listing Number: 20.106 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Transportation Pass-Through Entity: Not Applicable Criteria: All laborers and mechanics employed by contractors or subcontractors to work on construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by Federal assistance funds must be paid wages not less than those established for the locality of the project (prevailing wage rates) by the Department of Labor (DOL) (40 USC 3141?3144, 3146, and 3147). Non-Federal entities shall include in their construction contracts subject to the Wage Rate Requirements (which still may be referenced as the Davis-Bacon Act) a provision that the contractor or subcontractor comply with those requirements and the DOL regulations. This includes a requirement for the contractor or subcontractor to submit to the Non-Federal entity weekly, for each week in which any contract work is performed, a copy of the payroll and a statement of compliance (certified payrolls). (29 CFR sections 5.5 and 5.6; the A-102 Common Rule (section 36(i)(5)); OMB Circular A-110 (2 CFR Part 215, Appendix A, Contract Provisions); 2 CFR Part 176, Subpart C; and 2 CFR section 200.326). In addition, according to 2 CFR Part 200.303, the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition: The City did not obtain all of the required certified payrolls for contractor or subcontractor work performed during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2022. In addition, the City did not have internal controls in place to identify that these certified payrolls were not being obtained. Questioned Costs: Unknown Context: The City did not obtain any certified payrolls for contractor or subcontractor work performed from one of the two construction contractors used for the projects for this program. This one contractor accounted for 94 percent of the construction expenditures during fiscal year 2022. Effect: Certified payrolls were not obtained or reviewed for the project so laborers and mechanics employed by contractors or subcontractors may not have been paid prevailing wage rates. Cause: The City did not ensure that all required certified payrolls were being obtained. There was no one person or group assigned to monitor, review, and obtain certified payrolls during the year from contractors and subcontractors. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Not applicable. Recommendation: We recommend that the City design and implement internal controls to ensure compliance with the program?s wage rates requirements. These controls should include monitoring construction contracts, tracking weekly certified payrolls or notification of no work performed, and reviewing to ensure that the payrolls are properly certified for all contractor and subcontractor work performed. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan
Finding: Special Tests - Wage Rate Requirements Federal Program: Airport Improvement Program Assistance Listing Number: 20.106 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Transportation Pass-Through Entity: Not Applicable Criteria: All laborers and mechanics employed by contractors or subcontractors to work on construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by Federal assistance funds must be paid wages not less than those established for the locality of the project (prevailing wage rates) by the Department of Labor (DOL) (40 USC 3141?3144, 3146, and 3147). Non-Federal entities shall include in their construction contracts subject to the Wage Rate Requirements (which still may be referenced as the Davis-Bacon Act) a provision that the contractor or subcontractor comply with those requirements and the DOL regulations. This includes a requirement for the contractor or subcontractor to submit to the Non-Federal entity weekly, for each week in which any contract work is performed, a copy of the payroll and a statement of compliance (certified payrolls). (29 CFR sections 5.5 and 5.6; the A-102 Common Rule (section 36(i)(5)); OMB Circular A-110 (2 CFR Part 215, Appendix A, Contract Provisions); 2 CFR Part 176, Subpart C; and 2 CFR section 200.326). In addition, according to 2 CFR Part 200.303, the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition: The City did not obtain all of the required certified payrolls for contractor or subcontractor work performed during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2022. In addition, the City did not have internal controls in place to identify that these certified payrolls were not being obtained. Questioned Costs: Unknown Context: The City did not obtain any certified payrolls for contractor or subcontractor work performed from one of the two construction contractors used for the projects for this program. This one contractor accounted for 94 percent of the construction expenditures during fiscal year 2022. Effect: Certified payrolls were not obtained or reviewed for the project so laborers and mechanics employed by contractors or subcontractors may not have been paid prevailing wage rates. Cause: The City did not ensure that all required certified payrolls were being obtained. There was no one person or group assigned to monitor, review, and obtain certified payrolls during the year from contractors and subcontractors. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Not applicable. Recommendation: We recommend that the City design and implement internal controls to ensure compliance with the program?s wage rates requirements. These controls should include monitoring construction contracts, tracking weekly certified payrolls or notification of no work performed, and reviewing to ensure that the payrolls are properly certified for all contractor and subcontractor work performed. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan
Finding: Special Tests - Wage Rate Requirements Federal Program: Airport Improvement Program Assistance Listing Number: 20.106 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Transportation Pass-Through Entity: Not Applicable Criteria: All laborers and mechanics employed by contractors or subcontractors to work on construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by Federal assistance funds must be paid wages not less than those established for the locality of the project (prevailing wage rates) by the Department of Labor (DOL) (40 USC 3141?3144, 3146, and 3147). Non-Federal entities shall include in their construction contracts subject to the Wage Rate Requirements (which still may be referenced as the Davis-Bacon Act) a provision that the contractor or subcontractor comply with those requirements and the DOL regulations. This includes a requirement for the contractor or subcontractor to submit to the Non-Federal entity weekly, for each week in which any contract work is performed, a copy of the payroll and a statement of compliance (certified payrolls). (29 CFR sections 5.5 and 5.6; the A-102 Common Rule (section 36(i)(5)); OMB Circular A-110 (2 CFR Part 215, Appendix A, Contract Provisions); 2 CFR Part 176, Subpart C; and 2 CFR section 200.326). In addition, according to 2 CFR Part 200.303, the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition: The City did not obtain all of the required certified payrolls for contractor or subcontractor work performed during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2022. In addition, the City did not have internal controls in place to identify that these certified payrolls were not being obtained. Questioned Costs: Unknown Context: The City did not obtain any certified payrolls for contractor or subcontractor work performed from one of the two construction contractors used for the projects for this program. This one contractor accounted for 94 percent of the construction expenditures during fiscal year 2022. Effect: Certified payrolls were not obtained or reviewed for the project so laborers and mechanics employed by contractors or subcontractors may not have been paid prevailing wage rates. Cause: The City did not ensure that all required certified payrolls were being obtained. There was no one person or group assigned to monitor, review, and obtain certified payrolls during the year from contractors and subcontractors. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Not applicable. Recommendation: We recommend that the City design and implement internal controls to ensure compliance with the program?s wage rates requirements. These controls should include monitoring construction contracts, tracking weekly certified payrolls or notification of no work performed, and reviewing to ensure that the payrolls are properly certified for all contractor and subcontractor work performed. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan
Finding: Special Tests - Wage Rate Requirements Federal Program: Airport Improvement Program Assistance Listing Number: 20.106 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Transportation Pass-Through Entity: Not Applicable Criteria: All laborers and mechanics employed by contractors or subcontractors to work on construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by Federal assistance funds must be paid wages not less than those established for the locality of the project (prevailing wage rates) by the Department of Labor (DOL) (40 USC 3141?3144, 3146, and 3147). Non-Federal entities shall include in their construction contracts subject to the Wage Rate Requirements (which still may be referenced as the Davis-Bacon Act) a provision that the contractor or subcontractor comply with those requirements and the DOL regulations. This includes a requirement for the contractor or subcontractor to submit to the Non-Federal entity weekly, for each week in which any contract work is performed, a copy of the payroll and a statement of compliance (certified payrolls). (29 CFR sections 5.5 and 5.6; the A-102 Common Rule (section 36(i)(5)); OMB Circular A-110 (2 CFR Part 215, Appendix A, Contract Provisions); 2 CFR Part 176, Subpart C; and 2 CFR section 200.326). In addition, according to 2 CFR Part 200.303, the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition: The City did not obtain all of the required certified payrolls for contractor or subcontractor work performed during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2022. In addition, the City did not have internal controls in place to identify that these certified payrolls were not being obtained. Questioned Costs: Unknown Context: The City did not obtain any certified payrolls for contractor or subcontractor work performed from one of the two construction contractors used for the projects for this program. This one contractor accounted for 94 percent of the construction expenditures during fiscal year 2022. Effect: Certified payrolls were not obtained or reviewed for the project so laborers and mechanics employed by contractors or subcontractors may not have been paid prevailing wage rates. Cause: The City did not ensure that all required certified payrolls were being obtained. There was no one person or group assigned to monitor, review, and obtain certified payrolls during the year from contractors and subcontractors. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Not applicable. Recommendation: We recommend that the City design and implement internal controls to ensure compliance with the program?s wage rates requirements. These controls should include monitoring construction contracts, tracking weekly certified payrolls or notification of no work performed, and reviewing to ensure that the payrolls are properly certified for all contractor and subcontractor work performed. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan
Finding: Special Tests - Wage Rate Requirements Federal Program: Airport Improvement Program Assistance Listing Number: 20.106 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Transportation Pass-Through Entity: Not Applicable Criteria: All laborers and mechanics employed by contractors or subcontractors to work on construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by Federal assistance funds must be paid wages not less than those established for the locality of the project (prevailing wage rates) by the Department of Labor (DOL) (40 USC 3141?3144, 3146, and 3147). Non-Federal entities shall include in their construction contracts subject to the Wage Rate Requirements (which still may be referenced as the Davis-Bacon Act) a provision that the contractor or subcontractor comply with those requirements and the DOL regulations. This includes a requirement for the contractor or subcontractor to submit to the Non-Federal entity weekly, for each week in which any contract work is performed, a copy of the payroll and a statement of compliance (certified payrolls). (29 CFR sections 5.5 and 5.6; the A-102 Common Rule (section 36(i)(5)); OMB Circular A-110 (2 CFR Part 215, Appendix A, Contract Provisions); 2 CFR Part 176, Subpart C; and 2 CFR section 200.326). In addition, according to 2 CFR Part 200.303, the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition: The City did not obtain all of the required certified payrolls for contractor or subcontractor work performed during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2022. In addition, the City did not have internal controls in place to identify that these certified payrolls were not being obtained. Questioned Costs: Unknown Context: The City did not obtain any certified payrolls for contractor or subcontractor work performed from one of the two construction contractors used for the projects for this program. This one contractor accounted for 94 percent of the construction expenditures during fiscal year 2022. Effect: Certified payrolls were not obtained or reviewed for the project so laborers and mechanics employed by contractors or subcontractors may not have been paid prevailing wage rates. Cause: The City did not ensure that all required certified payrolls were being obtained. There was no one person or group assigned to monitor, review, and obtain certified payrolls during the year from contractors and subcontractors. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Not applicable. Recommendation: We recommend that the City design and implement internal controls to ensure compliance with the program?s wage rates requirements. These controls should include monitoring construction contracts, tracking weekly certified payrolls or notification of no work performed, and reviewing to ensure that the payrolls are properly certified for all contractor and subcontractor work performed. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan
Finding: Special Tests - Wage Rate Requirements Federal Program: Airport Improvement Program Assistance Listing Number: 20.106 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Transportation Pass-Through Entity: Not Applicable Criteria: All laborers and mechanics employed by contractors or subcontractors to work on construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by Federal assistance funds must be paid wages not less than those established for the locality of the project (prevailing wage rates) by the Department of Labor (DOL) (40 USC 3141?3144, 3146, and 3147). Non-Federal entities shall include in their construction contracts subject to the Wage Rate Requirements (which still may be referenced as the Davis-Bacon Act) a provision that the contractor or subcontractor comply with those requirements and the DOL regulations. This includes a requirement for the contractor or subcontractor to submit to the Non-Federal entity weekly, for each week in which any contract work is performed, a copy of the payroll and a statement of compliance (certified payrolls). (29 CFR sections 5.5 and 5.6; the A-102 Common Rule (section 36(i)(5)); OMB Circular A-110 (2 CFR Part 215, Appendix A, Contract Provisions); 2 CFR Part 176, Subpart C; and 2 CFR section 200.326). In addition, according to 2 CFR Part 200.303, the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition: The City did not obtain all of the required certified payrolls for contractor or subcontractor work performed during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2022. In addition, the City did not have internal controls in place to identify that these certified payrolls were not being obtained. Questioned Costs: Unknown Context: The City did not obtain any certified payrolls for contractor or subcontractor work performed from one of the two construction contractors used for the projects for this program. This one contractor accounted for 94 percent of the construction expenditures during fiscal year 2022. Effect: Certified payrolls were not obtained or reviewed for the project so laborers and mechanics employed by contractors or subcontractors may not have been paid prevailing wage rates. Cause: The City did not ensure that all required certified payrolls were being obtained. There was no one person or group assigned to monitor, review, and obtain certified payrolls during the year from contractors and subcontractors. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Not applicable. Recommendation: We recommend that the City design and implement internal controls to ensure compliance with the program?s wage rates requirements. These controls should include monitoring construction contracts, tracking weekly certified payrolls or notification of no work performed, and reviewing to ensure that the payrolls are properly certified for all contractor and subcontractor work performed. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan
Finding No.: 2022-001 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Pass-Through Entity: Guam Housing and Urban Renewal Authority AL Program: COVID-19 14.231 Emergency Solutions Grant Program Federal Award No.: E-20-SW-66-0001 Area: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Questioned Cost: $1,095,000 Criteria: In accordance with applicable procurement and suspension and debarment requirements, the non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the Procurement Standards in 2 CFR ? 200.318-327, which require formal procurement methods when the procurement of goods or services exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold (i.e., $250,000). Condition: For one (or 20%) of five procurement transactions tested, aggregating $1,512K out of $1,519K in total non-payroll program expenditures, the small purchases method was used to procure rental of 40 rooms to be used as emergency shelters with an annual contract amount of $1,095K. Based on the contract amount, a formal procurement method should have been used in performing the procurement. Cause: Catholic Social Service (CSS) lacks controls over compliance with applicable procurement requirements. The procurement policy of CSS is not prepared in accordance with the Procurement Standards in 2 CFR 200.318-327, as it does not require formal procurement procedures for any transactions. Effect: CSS is in noncompliance with applicable procurement and suspension and debarment requirements. The total questioned cost is $1,095,000. Recommendation: CSS should establish and implement controls over compliance with applicable procurement and suspension and debarment requirements. CSS management should revisit its procurement policy for alignment with the Procurement Standards in 2 CFR 200.318-327. Views of responsible officials: CSS disagrees with the finding that CSS is in noncompliance with applicable procurement requirements cited in 2 CFR 200.318-327, resulting in a questioned cost of $1,095,000. The federal ESG-CV grant awarded to Guam Housing and Urban Renewal Authority (GHURA) to respond to the impact of COVID-19 pandemic provided waivers and alternative requirements, including greater flexibility, to establish expedited response actions to mitigate the spread of the coronavirus. Exhibit D of the sub-recipient agreement (SRA) provides for this reference of waivers and alternative requirements. Specifically, page 18 of Section III.F.8 of Exhibit D of the SRA states the following: ?8. Procurement. As provided by the CARES Act, the recipient may deviate from the applicable procurement standards (e.g., 24 CFR 576.407(c) and (f) and 2 CFR 200.317-200.326) when procuring goods and services to prevent, prepare for, and respond to coronavirus. If the recipient deviates from its procurement standards, then the recipient must establish alternative written procurement standards, and maintain documentation on the alternative procurement standards used to safeguard against fraud, waste, and abuse in the procurement of goods and services to prevent, prepare for, and respond to coronavirus. This alternative requirement is necessary to ensure the funds are used efficiently and effectively to prevent, prepare for, and respond to coronavirus. Notwithstanding this flexibility, the debarment and suspension regulations at 2 CFR part 180 and 2 CFR part 2424 apply as written.? The opening of a temporary emergency shelter for families and individuals who are homeless was deemed an emergency response to the coronavirus. CSS emphasizes that the focus of GHURA was to identify readily available units and obtain price quotations to stand up an emergency homeless shelter, and the ?small purchase method? would provide that information to expedite the procurement process. This process was communicated to GHURA, as well as outcome of surveys of available units, and recommendation for selection of site. CSS agrees on the recommendation to revisit CSS? procurement policy overall that would assure objectivity and cost efficiency in the purchase of goods and services, including aligning and/or adopting verbatim procurement requirements outlined in 2 CFR 200.318-327. Auditor response: The written communications between CSS and GHURA were not provided. Also, the procurement file lacks sufficient documentation to demonstrate that the use of the small purchase method was a deviation from its procurement standards or was used to safeguard against fraud, waste, and abuse. Based on the inspected procurement file, only one out of three suppliers had provided CSS a quotation. Given the high value of the procurement, CSS should have further solicited quotations from other suppliers or documented the rationale for not pursuing additional quotations from available suppliers.
Finding No.: 2022-001 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Pass-Through Entity: Guam Housing and Urban Renewal Authority AL Program: COVID-19 14.231 Emergency Solutions Grant Program Federal Award No.: E-20-SW-66-0001 Area: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Questioned Cost: $1,095,000 Criteria: In accordance with applicable procurement and suspension and debarment requirements, the non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the Procurement Standards in 2 CFR ? 200.318-327, which require formal procurement methods when the procurement of goods or services exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold (i.e., $250,000). Condition: For one (or 20%) of five procurement transactions tested, aggregating $1,512K out of $1,519K in total non-payroll program expenditures, the small purchases method was used to procure rental of 40 rooms to be used as emergency shelters with an annual contract amount of $1,095K. Based on the contract amount, a formal procurement method should have been used in performing the procurement. Cause: Catholic Social Service (CSS) lacks controls over compliance with applicable procurement requirements. The procurement policy of CSS is not prepared in accordance with the Procurement Standards in 2 CFR 200.318-327, as it does not require formal procurement procedures for any transactions. Effect: CSS is in noncompliance with applicable procurement and suspension and debarment requirements. The total questioned cost is $1,095,000. Recommendation: CSS should establish and implement controls over compliance with applicable procurement and suspension and debarment requirements. CSS management should revisit its procurement policy for alignment with the Procurement Standards in 2 CFR 200.318-327. Views of responsible officials: CSS disagrees with the finding that CSS is in noncompliance with applicable procurement requirements cited in 2 CFR 200.318-327, resulting in a questioned cost of $1,095,000. The federal ESG-CV grant awarded to Guam Housing and Urban Renewal Authority (GHURA) to respond to the impact of COVID-19 pandemic provided waivers and alternative requirements, including greater flexibility, to establish expedited response actions to mitigate the spread of the coronavirus. Exhibit D of the sub-recipient agreement (SRA) provides for this reference of waivers and alternative requirements. Specifically, page 18 of Section III.F.8 of Exhibit D of the SRA states the following: ?8. Procurement. As provided by the CARES Act, the recipient may deviate from the applicable procurement standards (e.g., 24 CFR 576.407(c) and (f) and 2 CFR 200.317-200.326) when procuring goods and services to prevent, prepare for, and respond to coronavirus. If the recipient deviates from its procurement standards, then the recipient must establish alternative written procurement standards, and maintain documentation on the alternative procurement standards used to safeguard against fraud, waste, and abuse in the procurement of goods and services to prevent, prepare for, and respond to coronavirus. This alternative requirement is necessary to ensure the funds are used efficiently and effectively to prevent, prepare for, and respond to coronavirus. Notwithstanding this flexibility, the debarment and suspension regulations at 2 CFR part 180 and 2 CFR part 2424 apply as written.? The opening of a temporary emergency shelter for families and individuals who are homeless was deemed an emergency response to the coronavirus. CSS emphasizes that the focus of GHURA was to identify readily available units and obtain price quotations to stand up an emergency homeless shelter, and the ?small purchase method? would provide that information to expedite the procurement process. This process was communicated to GHURA, as well as outcome of surveys of available units, and recommendation for selection of site. CSS agrees on the recommendation to revisit CSS? procurement policy overall that would assure objectivity and cost efficiency in the purchase of goods and services, including aligning and/or adopting verbatim procurement requirements outlined in 2 CFR 200.318-327. Auditor response: The written communications between CSS and GHURA were not provided. Also, the procurement file lacks sufficient documentation to demonstrate that the use of the small purchase method was a deviation from its procurement standards or was used to safeguard against fraud, waste, and abuse. Based on the inspected procurement file, only one out of three suppliers had provided CSS a quotation. Given the high value of the procurement, CSS should have further solicited quotations from other suppliers or documented the rationale for not pursuing additional quotations from available suppliers.
Information on the Federal Program: Assistance Listing Number 21.027-Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, U.S. Department of the Treasury. Compliance Requirements: Procurement. Type of Finding: Noncompliance. Criteria: 2 CFR § 200.319(d) requires that the non-Federal entity must maintain written procedures for procurement transactions. Condition: We noted that the County did not have written procedures for procurement transactions that include the provisions required by the Procurement Standards 2 CFR § 200.318 through 2 CFR § 200.327 in fiscal year 2022. Cause: The County was not aware of the requirement to have written procedures for procurement transactions. Effect: Failure to have adequate written procedures for procurement transactions could result in the acquisition of goods or services in violation with administrative requirements, federal regulations, other procurement requirements, and Uniform Guidance requirements. Questioned Costs: There are no questioned costs. Recommendation: We recommend that the County identify grants that are subject to Uniform Guidance on a timely basis to ensure all compliance requirements are met and develop adequate written policies and procedures for procurement transactions. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The County has identified federal grants subject to the Uniform Guidance and will develop written policies and procedures which include the relevant provisions required by 2 CFR § 200.318 through 2 CFR § 200.326 Contract provisions.
Information on the Federal Program: Assistance Listing Number 21.027-Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, U.S. Department of the Treasury. Compliance Requirements: Procurement. Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance. Criteria: Internal controls should be in place to provide reasonable assurance that procurement of goods and services are made in compliance with federal regulations and other procurement requirements, as applicable. Condition: The County lacks sufficient controls over procurement to ensure compliance with federal regulations and other procurement requirements, as applicable. Cause: The County did not design and implement controls over compliance with procurement. Effect or Potential Effect: Failure to have adequate internal controls over compliance with procurement could result in the acquisition of goods or services in violation with administrative requirements, federal regulations, and other procurement requirements. Questioned Costs: There are no questioned costs. Recommendation: We recommend that the County create and adopt an official written policy for procurement and contracts establishing contract files that document significant procurement history; methods of procurement authorized including selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis of contract price; verification that procurements provide full and open competition; requirements for cost or price analysis, including for contract modifications; obtaining and reacting to suspension and debarment certifications; and other applicable requirements for procurements under federal awards are followed. We also recommend that personnel with adequate knowledge and experience of responsibilities for procurements for federal awards review procurement and contracting decisions for compliance with federal procurement policies. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Management concurs with the audit finding. The County will develop written policies and procedures for procurement, including the relevant provisions required by 2 CFR § 200.318 through 2 CFR § 200.326 Contract provisions. Management will evaluate the need to contract with local government consultants to perform control procedures where County personnel are not available or qualified to perform.
2022-001 Department of State ? Bureau of Population, Refugees, and MigrationFederal Financial Assistance Listing #19.517, Overseas Refugee Assistance Programs for AfricaAgency for International DevelopmentDepartment of State - Federal Financial Assistance Listing # 98.001, USAID Foreign Assistance for Programs OverseasProcurement, Suspension and DebarmentType of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over ComplianceGrant Award Number: Affects all grant awards included under Federal Financial Assistance Listing #19.517 and #98.001 on the Schedule.Criteria: Uniform Guidance and 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 set forth the procurement standards non-federal entities, other than states, must follow when operating federal programs and the required procurement procedures based on the amount of the transaction.Condition: CVT has documented procurement procedures that conform to applicable federal standards; however, the procedures were not followed regarding maintaining documentation of obtaining quotes for simplified acquisition small purchases and the conclusion as to which item was selected. In addition, CVT was not testing vendors for suspension and debarment.Cause: Controls were not adequately designed due to lack of oversight, awareness, or understanding of all of the specific requirements under the Uniform Guidance and applicable CFR sections.Effect: The best price for the purchase may not have been obtained and payments could be made to recipients who were suspended or debarred.Questioned Costs: None reported.Context/Sampling: For Federal Financial Assistance Listing #19.517, a nonstatistical sample of 60 transactions out of 2,935 total transactions was selected for testing. Required documentation related to procurement was not maintained for 13 of the items selected, and 13 of the items selected did not have support for suspension and debarment. For Federal Financial Assistance Listing #98.001, a nonstatistical sample of 60 transactions out of 1,594 total transactions were selected for testing. Required documentation related to procurement was not maintained for six of the items selected, and seven of the items selected did not have support for suspension, and debarment.Repeat Finding from Prior Year: Yes, prior year finding 2021-001.Recommendation: We recommend that management maintain adequate supporting documentation and records to document history, methods of procurement, and documentation to support check for suspension and debarment to comply with these CFR sections.Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with this finding.
2022-001 Department of State ? Bureau of Population, Refugees, and MigrationFederal Financial Assistance Listing #19.517, Overseas Refugee Assistance Programs for AfricaAgency for International DevelopmentDepartment of State - Federal Financial Assistance Listing # 98.001, USAID Foreign Assistance for Programs OverseasProcurement, Suspension and DebarmentType of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over ComplianceGrant Award Number: Affects all grant awards included under Federal Financial Assistance Listing #19.517 and #98.001 on the Schedule.Criteria: Uniform Guidance and 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 set forth the procurement standards non-federal entities, other than states, must follow when operating federal programs and the required procurement procedures based on the amount of the transaction.Condition: CVT has documented procurement procedures that conform to applicable federal standards; however, the procedures were not followed regarding maintaining documentation of obtaining quotes for simplified acquisition small purchases and the conclusion as to which item was selected. In addition, CVT was not testing vendors for suspension and debarment.Cause: Controls were not adequately designed due to lack of oversight, awareness, or understanding of all of the specific requirements under the Uniform Guidance and applicable CFR sections.Effect: The best price for the purchase may not have been obtained and payments could be made to recipients who were suspended or debarred.Questioned Costs: None reported.Context/Sampling: For Federal Financial Assistance Listing #19.517, a nonstatistical sample of 60 transactions out of 2,935 total transactions was selected for testing. Required documentation related to procurement was not maintained for 13 of the items selected, and 13 of the items selected did not have support for suspension and debarment. For Federal Financial Assistance Listing #98.001, a nonstatistical sample of 60 transactions out of 1,594 total transactions were selected for testing. Required documentation related to procurement was not maintained for six of the items selected, and seven of the items selected did not have support for suspension, and debarment.Repeat Finding from Prior Year: Yes, prior year finding 2021-001.Recommendation: We recommend that management maintain adequate supporting documentation and records to document history, methods of procurement, and documentation to support check for suspension and debarment to comply with these CFR sections.Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with this finding.
2022-001 Department of State ? Bureau of Population, Refugees, and MigrationFederal Financial Assistance Listing #19.517, Overseas Refugee Assistance Programs for AfricaAgency for International DevelopmentDepartment of State - Federal Financial Assistance Listing # 98.001, USAID Foreign Assistance for Programs OverseasProcurement, Suspension and DebarmentType of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over ComplianceGrant Award Number: Affects all grant awards included under Federal Financial Assistance Listing #19.517 and #98.001 on the Schedule.Criteria: Uniform Guidance and 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 set forth the procurement standards non-federal entities, other than states, must follow when operating federal programs and the required procurement procedures based on the amount of the transaction.Condition: CVT has documented procurement procedures that conform to applicable federal standards; however, the procedures were not followed regarding maintaining documentation of obtaining quotes for simplified acquisition small purchases and the conclusion as to which item was selected. In addition, CVT was not testing vendors for suspension and debarment.Cause: Controls were not adequately designed due to lack of oversight, awareness, or understanding of all of the specific requirements under the Uniform Guidance and applicable CFR sections.Effect: The best price for the purchase may not have been obtained and payments could be made to recipients who were suspended or debarred.Questioned Costs: None reported.Context/Sampling: For Federal Financial Assistance Listing #19.517, a nonstatistical sample of 60 transactions out of 2,935 total transactions was selected for testing. Required documentation related to procurement was not maintained for 13 of the items selected, and 13 of the items selected did not have support for suspension and debarment. For Federal Financial Assistance Listing #98.001, a nonstatistical sample of 60 transactions out of 1,594 total transactions were selected for testing. Required documentation related to procurement was not maintained for six of the items selected, and seven of the items selected did not have support for suspension, and debarment.Repeat Finding from Prior Year: Yes, prior year finding 2021-001.Recommendation: We recommend that management maintain adequate supporting documentation and records to document history, methods of procurement, and documentation to support check for suspension and debarment to comply with these CFR sections.Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with this finding.
2022-001 Department of State ? Bureau of Population, Refugees, and MigrationFederal Financial Assistance Listing #19.517, Overseas Refugee Assistance Programs for AfricaAgency for International DevelopmentDepartment of State - Federal Financial Assistance Listing # 98.001, USAID Foreign Assistance for Programs OverseasProcurement, Suspension and DebarmentType of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over ComplianceGrant Award Number: Affects all grant awards included under Federal Financial Assistance Listing #19.517 and #98.001 on the Schedule.Criteria: Uniform Guidance and 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 set forth the procurement standards non-federal entities, other than states, must follow when operating federal programs and the required procurement procedures based on the amount of the transaction.Condition: CVT has documented procurement procedures that conform to applicable federal standards; however, the procedures were not followed regarding maintaining documentation of obtaining quotes for simplified acquisition small purchases and the conclusion as to which item was selected. In addition, CVT was not testing vendors for suspension and debarment.Cause: Controls were not adequately designed due to lack of oversight, awareness, or understanding of all of the specific requirements under the Uniform Guidance and applicable CFR sections.Effect: The best price for the purchase may not have been obtained and payments could be made to recipients who were suspended or debarred.Questioned Costs: None reported.Context/Sampling: For Federal Financial Assistance Listing #19.517, a nonstatistical sample of 60 transactions out of 2,935 total transactions was selected for testing. Required documentation related to procurement was not maintained for 13 of the items selected, and 13 of the items selected did not have support for suspension and debarment. For Federal Financial Assistance Listing #98.001, a nonstatistical sample of 60 transactions out of 1,594 total transactions were selected for testing. Required documentation related to procurement was not maintained for six of the items selected, and seven of the items selected did not have support for suspension, and debarment.Repeat Finding from Prior Year: Yes, prior year finding 2021-001.Recommendation: We recommend that management maintain adequate supporting documentation and records to document history, methods of procurement, and documentation to support check for suspension and debarment to comply with these CFR sections.Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with this finding.
2022-001 Department of State ? Bureau of Population, Refugees, and MigrationFederal Financial Assistance Listing #19.517, Overseas Refugee Assistance Programs for AfricaAgency for International DevelopmentDepartment of State - Federal Financial Assistance Listing # 98.001, USAID Foreign Assistance for Programs OverseasProcurement, Suspension and DebarmentType of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over ComplianceGrant Award Number: Affects all grant awards included under Federal Financial Assistance Listing #19.517 and #98.001 on the Schedule.Criteria: Uniform Guidance and 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 set forth the procurement standards non-federal entities, other than states, must follow when operating federal programs and the required procurement procedures based on the amount of the transaction.Condition: CVT has documented procurement procedures that conform to applicable federal standards; however, the procedures were not followed regarding maintaining documentation of obtaining quotes for simplified acquisition small purchases and the conclusion as to which item was selected. In addition, CVT was not testing vendors for suspension and debarment.Cause: Controls were not adequately designed due to lack of oversight, awareness, or understanding of all of the specific requirements under the Uniform Guidance and applicable CFR sections.Effect: The best price for the purchase may not have been obtained and payments could be made to recipients who were suspended or debarred.Questioned Costs: None reported.Context/Sampling: For Federal Financial Assistance Listing #19.517, a nonstatistical sample of 60 transactions out of 2,935 total transactions was selected for testing. Required documentation related to procurement was not maintained for 13 of the items selected, and 13 of the items selected did not have support for suspension and debarment. For Federal Financial Assistance Listing #98.001, a nonstatistical sample of 60 transactions out of 1,594 total transactions were selected for testing. Required documentation related to procurement was not maintained for six of the items selected, and seven of the items selected did not have support for suspension, and debarment.Repeat Finding from Prior Year: Yes, prior year finding 2021-001.Recommendation: We recommend that management maintain adequate supporting documentation and records to document history, methods of procurement, and documentation to support check for suspension and debarment to comply with these CFR sections.Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with this finding.
2022-001 Department of State ? Bureau of Population, Refugees, and MigrationFederal Financial Assistance Listing #19.517, Overseas Refugee Assistance Programs for AfricaAgency for International DevelopmentDepartment of State - Federal Financial Assistance Listing # 98.001, USAID Foreign Assistance for Programs OverseasProcurement, Suspension and DebarmentType of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over ComplianceGrant Award Number: Affects all grant awards included under Federal Financial Assistance Listing #19.517 and #98.001 on the Schedule.Criteria: Uniform Guidance and 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 set forth the procurement standards non-federal entities, other than states, must follow when operating federal programs and the required procurement procedures based on the amount of the transaction.Condition: CVT has documented procurement procedures that conform to applicable federal standards; however, the procedures were not followed regarding maintaining documentation of obtaining quotes for simplified acquisition small purchases and the conclusion as to which item was selected. In addition, CVT was not testing vendors for suspension and debarment.Cause: Controls were not adequately designed due to lack of oversight, awareness, or understanding of all of the specific requirements under the Uniform Guidance and applicable CFR sections.Effect: The best price for the purchase may not have been obtained and payments could be made to recipients who were suspended or debarred.Questioned Costs: None reported.Context/Sampling: For Federal Financial Assistance Listing #19.517, a nonstatistical sample of 60 transactions out of 2,935 total transactions was selected for testing. Required documentation related to procurement was not maintained for 13 of the items selected, and 13 of the items selected did not have support for suspension and debarment. For Federal Financial Assistance Listing #98.001, a nonstatistical sample of 60 transactions out of 1,594 total transactions were selected for testing. Required documentation related to procurement was not maintained for six of the items selected, and seven of the items selected did not have support for suspension, and debarment.Repeat Finding from Prior Year: Yes, prior year finding 2021-001.Recommendation: We recommend that management maintain adequate supporting documentation and records to document history, methods of procurement, and documentation to support check for suspension and debarment to comply with these CFR sections.Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with this finding.
2022-001 Department of State ? Bureau of Population, Refugees, and MigrationFederal Financial Assistance Listing #19.517, Overseas Refugee Assistance Programs for AfricaAgency for International DevelopmentDepartment of State - Federal Financial Assistance Listing # 98.001, USAID Foreign Assistance for Programs OverseasProcurement, Suspension and DebarmentType of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over ComplianceGrant Award Number: Affects all grant awards included under Federal Financial Assistance Listing #19.517 and #98.001 on the Schedule.Criteria: Uniform Guidance and 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 set forth the procurement standards non-federal entities, other than states, must follow when operating federal programs and the required procurement procedures based on the amount of the transaction.Condition: CVT has documented procurement procedures that conform to applicable federal standards; however, the procedures were not followed regarding maintaining documentation of obtaining quotes for simplified acquisition small purchases and the conclusion as to which item was selected. In addition, CVT was not testing vendors for suspension and debarment.Cause: Controls were not adequately designed due to lack of oversight, awareness, or understanding of all of the specific requirements under the Uniform Guidance and applicable CFR sections.Effect: The best price for the purchase may not have been obtained and payments could be made to recipients who were suspended or debarred.Questioned Costs: None reported.Context/Sampling: For Federal Financial Assistance Listing #19.517, a nonstatistical sample of 60 transactions out of 2,935 total transactions was selected for testing. Required documentation related to procurement was not maintained for 13 of the items selected, and 13 of the items selected did not have support for suspension and debarment. For Federal Financial Assistance Listing #98.001, a nonstatistical sample of 60 transactions out of 1,594 total transactions were selected for testing. Required documentation related to procurement was not maintained for six of the items selected, and seven of the items selected did not have support for suspension, and debarment.Repeat Finding from Prior Year: Yes, prior year finding 2021-001.Recommendation: We recommend that management maintain adequate supporting documentation and records to document history, methods of procurement, and documentation to support check for suspension and debarment to comply with these CFR sections.Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with this finding.
2022-001 Department of State ? Bureau of Population, Refugees, and MigrationFederal Financial Assistance Listing #19.517, Overseas Refugee Assistance Programs for AfricaAgency for International DevelopmentDepartment of State - Federal Financial Assistance Listing # 98.001, USAID Foreign Assistance for Programs OverseasProcurement, Suspension and DebarmentType of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over ComplianceGrant Award Number: Affects all grant awards included under Federal Financial Assistance Listing #19.517 and #98.001 on the Schedule.Criteria: Uniform Guidance and 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 set forth the procurement standards non-federal entities, other than states, must follow when operating federal programs and the required procurement procedures based on the amount of the transaction.Condition: CVT has documented procurement procedures that conform to applicable federal standards; however, the procedures were not followed regarding maintaining documentation of obtaining quotes for simplified acquisition small purchases and the conclusion as to which item was selected. In addition, CVT was not testing vendors for suspension and debarment.Cause: Controls were not adequately designed due to lack of oversight, awareness, or understanding of all of the specific requirements under the Uniform Guidance and applicable CFR sections.Effect: The best price for the purchase may not have been obtained and payments could be made to recipients who were suspended or debarred.Questioned Costs: None reported.Context/Sampling: For Federal Financial Assistance Listing #19.517, a nonstatistical sample of 60 transactions out of 2,935 total transactions was selected for testing. Required documentation related to procurement was not maintained for 13 of the items selected, and 13 of the items selected did not have support for suspension and debarment. For Federal Financial Assistance Listing #98.001, a nonstatistical sample of 60 transactions out of 1,594 total transactions were selected for testing. Required documentation related to procurement was not maintained for six of the items selected, and seven of the items selected did not have support for suspension, and debarment.Repeat Finding from Prior Year: Yes, prior year finding 2021-001.Recommendation: We recommend that management maintain adequate supporting documentation and records to document history, methods of procurement, and documentation to support check for suspension and debarment to comply with these CFR sections.Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with this finding.
2022-001 Department of State ? Bureau of Population, Refugees, and MigrationFederal Financial Assistance Listing #19.517, Overseas Refugee Assistance Programs for AfricaAgency for International DevelopmentDepartment of State - Federal Financial Assistance Listing # 98.001, USAID Foreign Assistance for Programs OverseasProcurement, Suspension and DebarmentType of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over ComplianceGrant Award Number: Affects all grant awards included under Federal Financial Assistance Listing #19.517 and #98.001 on the Schedule.Criteria: Uniform Guidance and 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 set forth the procurement standards non-federal entities, other than states, must follow when operating federal programs and the required procurement procedures based on the amount of the transaction.Condition: CVT has documented procurement procedures that conform to applicable federal standards; however, the procedures were not followed regarding maintaining documentation of obtaining quotes for simplified acquisition small purchases and the conclusion as to which item was selected. In addition, CVT was not testing vendors for suspension and debarment.Cause: Controls were not adequately designed due to lack of oversight, awareness, or understanding of all of the specific requirements under the Uniform Guidance and applicable CFR sections.Effect: The best price for the purchase may not have been obtained and payments could be made to recipients who were suspended or debarred.Questioned Costs: None reported.Context/Sampling: For Federal Financial Assistance Listing #19.517, a nonstatistical sample of 60 transactions out of 2,935 total transactions was selected for testing. Required documentation related to procurement was not maintained for 13 of the items selected, and 13 of the items selected did not have support for suspension and debarment. For Federal Financial Assistance Listing #98.001, a nonstatistical sample of 60 transactions out of 1,594 total transactions were selected for testing. Required documentation related to procurement was not maintained for six of the items selected, and seven of the items selected did not have support for suspension, and debarment.Repeat Finding from Prior Year: Yes, prior year finding 2021-001.Recommendation: We recommend that management maintain adequate supporting documentation and records to document history, methods of procurement, and documentation to support check for suspension and debarment to comply with these CFR sections.Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with this finding.
2022-001 Department of State ? Bureau of Population, Refugees, and MigrationFederal Financial Assistance Listing #19.517, Overseas Refugee Assistance Programs for AfricaAgency for International DevelopmentDepartment of State - Federal Financial Assistance Listing # 98.001, USAID Foreign Assistance for Programs OverseasProcurement, Suspension and DebarmentType of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over ComplianceGrant Award Number: Affects all grant awards included under Federal Financial Assistance Listing #19.517 and #98.001 on the Schedule.Criteria: Uniform Guidance and 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 set forth the procurement standards non-federal entities, other than states, must follow when operating federal programs and the required procurement procedures based on the amount of the transaction.Condition: CVT has documented procurement procedures that conform to applicable federal standards; however, the procedures were not followed regarding maintaining documentation of obtaining quotes for simplified acquisition small purchases and the conclusion as to which item was selected. In addition, CVT was not testing vendors for suspension and debarment.Cause: Controls were not adequately designed due to lack of oversight, awareness, or understanding of all of the specific requirements under the Uniform Guidance and applicable CFR sections.Effect: The best price for the purchase may not have been obtained and payments could be made to recipients who were suspended or debarred.Questioned Costs: None reported.Context/Sampling: For Federal Financial Assistance Listing #19.517, a nonstatistical sample of 60 transactions out of 2,935 total transactions was selected for testing. Required documentation related to procurement was not maintained for 13 of the items selected, and 13 of the items selected did not have support for suspension and debarment. For Federal Financial Assistance Listing #98.001, a nonstatistical sample of 60 transactions out of 1,594 total transactions were selected for testing. Required documentation related to procurement was not maintained for six of the items selected, and seven of the items selected did not have support for suspension, and debarment.Repeat Finding from Prior Year: Yes, prior year finding 2021-001.Recommendation: We recommend that management maintain adequate supporting documentation and records to document history, methods of procurement, and documentation to support check for suspension and debarment to comply with these CFR sections.Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with this finding.
2022-001 Department of State ? Bureau of Population, Refugees, and MigrationFederal Financial Assistance Listing #19.517, Overseas Refugee Assistance Programs for AfricaAgency for International DevelopmentDepartment of State - Federal Financial Assistance Listing # 98.001, USAID Foreign Assistance for Programs OverseasProcurement, Suspension and DebarmentType of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over ComplianceGrant Award Number: Affects all grant awards included under Federal Financial Assistance Listing #19.517 and #98.001 on the Schedule.Criteria: Uniform Guidance and 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 set forth the procurement standards non-federal entities, other than states, must follow when operating federal programs and the required procurement procedures based on the amount of the transaction.Condition: CVT has documented procurement procedures that conform to applicable federal standards; however, the procedures were not followed regarding maintaining documentation of obtaining quotes for simplified acquisition small purchases and the conclusion as to which item was selected. In addition, CVT was not testing vendors for suspension and debarment.Cause: Controls were not adequately designed due to lack of oversight, awareness, or understanding of all of the specific requirements under the Uniform Guidance and applicable CFR sections.Effect: The best price for the purchase may not have been obtained and payments could be made to recipients who were suspended or debarred.Questioned Costs: None reported.Context/Sampling: For Federal Financial Assistance Listing #19.517, a nonstatistical sample of 60 transactions out of 2,935 total transactions was selected for testing. Required documentation related to procurement was not maintained for 13 of the items selected, and 13 of the items selected did not have support for suspension and debarment. For Federal Financial Assistance Listing #98.001, a nonstatistical sample of 60 transactions out of 1,594 total transactions were selected for testing. Required documentation related to procurement was not maintained for six of the items selected, and seven of the items selected did not have support for suspension, and debarment.Repeat Finding from Prior Year: Yes, prior year finding 2021-001.Recommendation: We recommend that management maintain adequate supporting documentation and records to document history, methods of procurement, and documentation to support check for suspension and debarment to comply with these CFR sections.Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with this finding.
Finding Number: 2022‐002 Repeat Finding: Yes, 2021‐002 Federal Program Name/Assistance Listing Title: COVID‐19 Federal Transit Cluster Federal Assistance Listing Number: 20.507 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Award Number: N/A Federal Pass‐Through Agency: N/A State Program Name: State Urbanized Area Formula Program, State Formula Grants For Rural Areas State Agency: Texas Department of Transportation Questioned Costs: N/A Type of Finding: Noncompliance, Material Weakness Compliance Requirement: Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Criteria Non‐federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR §§200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable State and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200. Additionally, non‐federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. When a non‐federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the non‐federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR §180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. This verification may be accomplished by (1) checking the System of Award Management (SAM) maintained by the General Services Administration (GSA) or (2) collecting a certification from the entity, or (3) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that entity (2 CFR §180.300). Condition The Transit District did not meet the requirement to verify that covered transactions were only made to an entity that was not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded. Additionally, the Transit District did not follow federal guidelines for purchases exceeding the small purchases threshold. Cause The Transit District’s internal controls over procurement of goods and services were not adequate. Effect The Transit District was not in compliance with Federal regulations and guidelines related to suspension and debarment or procurement. Context The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. During our review of purchasing, we noted the following: - For seven procurements over $25,000 reviewed, documentation demonstrating a vendor check for suspension and debarment was not retained. - For five vendors reviewed with total expenditures below the Simplified Acquisition threshold, no documentation of quotes was maintained. - For three vendors reviewed with total expenditures that exceeded the Simplified Acquisition threshold, no documentation of a sealed procurement issued in accordance with federal guidelines was maintained. Recommendation The Transit District should maintain documentation of procurement actions in the vendor file including sealed procurements issued, quotes and suspension and debarment checks. Review of procurement compliance should occur before the Transit District’s funds are obligated. Views of Responsible Officials See Corrective Action Plan.
Finding Number: 2022‐002 Repeat Finding: Yes, 2021‐002 Federal Program Name/Assistance Listing Title: COVID‐19 Federal Transit Cluster Federal Assistance Listing Number: 20.507 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Award Number: N/A Federal Pass‐Through Agency: N/A State Program Name: State Urbanized Area Formula Program, State Formula Grants For Rural Areas State Agency: Texas Department of Transportation Questioned Costs: N/A Type of Finding: Noncompliance, Material Weakness Compliance Requirement: Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Criteria Non‐federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR §§200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable State and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200. Additionally, non‐federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. When a non‐federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the non‐federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR §180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. This verification may be accomplished by (1) checking the System of Award Management (SAM) maintained by the General Services Administration (GSA) or (2) collecting a certification from the entity, or (3) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that entity (2 CFR §180.300). Condition The Transit District did not meet the requirement to verify that covered transactions were only made to an entity that was not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded. Additionally, the Transit District did not follow federal guidelines for purchases exceeding the small purchases threshold. Cause The Transit District’s internal controls over procurement of goods and services were not adequate. Effect The Transit District was not in compliance with Federal regulations and guidelines related to suspension and debarment or procurement. Context The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. During our review of purchasing, we noted the following: - For seven procurements over $25,000 reviewed, documentation demonstrating a vendor check for suspension and debarment was not retained. - For five vendors reviewed with total expenditures below the Simplified Acquisition threshold, no documentation of quotes was maintained. - For three vendors reviewed with total expenditures that exceeded the Simplified Acquisition threshold, no documentation of a sealed procurement issued in accordance with federal guidelines was maintained. Recommendation The Transit District should maintain documentation of procurement actions in the vendor file including sealed procurements issued, quotes and suspension and debarment checks. Review of procurement compliance should occur before the Transit District’s funds are obligated. Views of Responsible Officials See Corrective Action Plan.
2022-004 Procurement - Material Weakness Criteria: The Town must follow the procurement standards et out at 2CFR section 200.318 through 200.326. This requires bids be placed for purchases ranging from $10,000-$250,000. The Town currently has policies in place utilizing the state library listing of approved vendors for potential purchases over $50,000. The CFR does allow an entity to increase the lower limit from $10,000 to $50,000 in certain circumstances. One of the conditions is that the entity qualifies as a low risk entity. The Town currently does not qualify as a low risk entity therefore the Town does not qualify for the increase of the lower limit. Sole source vendors are the exception to this rule. Condition: The Town did not obtained 3 bids for over $10,000 purchases. The Town did use the State's liability to identify eligible vendors but failed to get bids. Cause: The Town has had significant difficulties in retaining both a Town Clerk and Accountant who have the capacity to follow procurement policies. This caused purchases to be made without following required procurement procedures. Effect: The Town is not in compliance with the Uniform Guidance and therefore, the Town bas the possibility of not being able to renew contracts in the future. Recommendation: We recommend that the Town follow the procurement policy to comply with federal guidance. Views of Responsible Officias and Planned Corrective Actions: See Corrective Action Plan.
Criteria Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(b)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The requirements that apply to procurement under grants and cooperative agreements are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.326, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Criteria (continued) Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. The requirements for nonprocurement suspension and debarment are contained in OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, “Debarment and Suspension;” federal awarding agency regulations in Title 2 of the CFR adopting/implementing the OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180; program legislation; and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition The Organization was unable to support adherence to procurement policies for several active contracts under the federal program for fiscal year ending August 31, 2022. Specifically, the Organization failed to maintain documentation history of procurement for four out of the twenty-six active contracts tested that were either paid in full or in part by the Unaccompanied Alien Children Program. All of these contracts were procured at least three years previous. For three of the four contracts the winning proposal and proper approval for the contact was maintained, but no other procurement documentation. For the other contract no procurement history maintained. There were no errors found in any of the contract samples that were procured under the Organization’s current procurement policies. Cause The Organization is aware they are operating under contracts that were procured in previous years that may not have all the records maintained. Reprocuring all of these contracts at once would potentially cause disruptions in operations due to the products/services related those vendors playing an important role in the Organization’s day-to-day operations. As such, the Organization still has several active contracts procured under the old policies that they are working on reprocuring as these contracts’ renewal dates arise, if not earlier. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization could potentially be under contract with vendors that are not the best value, not adequately qualified, potentially suspended or debarred, or otherwise not suitable for contract under federal procurement guidelines. No questioned costs were identified as all services/goods under these contracts were deemed to be allowable under the program, and no exceptions noted for allowable costs/activities for samples that included payment to these vendors. Recommendation The Organization should review all its “legacy” contracts that were procured under the previous procurement policies to determine if there is proper documentation maintained for compliance with applicable procurement guidelines. This includes systematically re-procuring any current contracts not in compliance as soon as feasible. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See corrective action plan.
Criteria Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(b)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The requirements that apply to procurement under grants and cooperative agreements are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.326, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Criteria (continued) Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. The requirements for nonprocurement suspension and debarment are contained in OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, “Debarment and Suspension;” federal awarding agency regulations in Title 2 of the CFR adopting/implementing the OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180; program legislation; and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition The Organization was unable to support adherence to procurement policies for several active contracts under the federal program for fiscal year ending August 31, 2022. Specifically, the Organization failed to maintain documentation history of procurement for four out of the twenty-six active contracts tested that were either paid in full or in part by the Unaccompanied Alien Children Program. All of these contracts were procured at least three years previous. For three of the four contracts the winning proposal and proper approval for the contact was maintained, but no other procurement documentation. For the other contract no procurement history maintained. There were no errors found in any of the contract samples that were procured under the Organization’s current procurement policies. Cause The Organization is aware they are operating under contracts that were procured in previous years that may not have all the records maintained. Reprocuring all of these contracts at once would potentially cause disruptions in operations due to the products/services related those vendors playing an important role in the Organization’s day-to-day operations. As such, the Organization still has several active contracts procured under the old policies that they are working on reprocuring as these contracts’ renewal dates arise, if not earlier. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization could potentially be under contract with vendors that are not the best value, not adequately qualified, potentially suspended or debarred, or otherwise not suitable for contract under federal procurement guidelines. No questioned costs were identified as all services/goods under these contracts were deemed to be allowable under the program, and no exceptions noted for allowable costs/activities for samples that included payment to these vendors. Recommendation The Organization should review all its “legacy” contracts that were procured under the previous procurement policies to determine if there is proper documentation maintained for compliance with applicable procurement guidelines. This includes systematically re-procuring any current contracts not in compliance as soon as feasible. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See corrective action plan.
Criteria Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(b)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The requirements that apply to procurement under grants and cooperative agreements are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.326, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Criteria (continued) Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. The requirements for nonprocurement suspension and debarment are contained in OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, “Debarment and Suspension;” federal awarding agency regulations in Title 2 of the CFR adopting/implementing the OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180; program legislation; and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition The Organization was unable to support adherence to procurement policies for several active contracts under the federal program for fiscal year ending August 31, 2022. Specifically, the Organization failed to maintain documentation history of procurement for four out of the twenty-six active contracts tested that were either paid in full or in part by the Unaccompanied Alien Children Program. All of these contracts were procured at least three years previous. For three of the four contracts the winning proposal and proper approval for the contact was maintained, but no other procurement documentation. For the other contract no procurement history maintained. There were no errors found in any of the contract samples that were procured under the Organization’s current procurement policies. Cause The Organization is aware they are operating under contracts that were procured in previous years that may not have all the records maintained. Reprocuring all of these contracts at once would potentially cause disruptions in operations due to the products/services related those vendors playing an important role in the Organization’s day-to-day operations. As such, the Organization still has several active contracts procured under the old policies that they are working on reprocuring as these contracts’ renewal dates arise, if not earlier. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization could potentially be under contract with vendors that are not the best value, not adequately qualified, potentially suspended or debarred, or otherwise not suitable for contract under federal procurement guidelines. No questioned costs were identified as all services/goods under these contracts were deemed to be allowable under the program, and no exceptions noted for allowable costs/activities for samples that included payment to these vendors. Recommendation The Organization should review all its “legacy” contracts that were procured under the previous procurement policies to determine if there is proper documentation maintained for compliance with applicable procurement guidelines. This includes systematically re-procuring any current contracts not in compliance as soon as feasible. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See corrective action plan.
Criteria Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(b)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The requirements that apply to procurement under grants and cooperative agreements are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.326, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Criteria (continued) Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. The requirements for nonprocurement suspension and debarment are contained in OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, “Debarment and Suspension;” federal awarding agency regulations in Title 2 of the CFR adopting/implementing the OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180; program legislation; and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition The Organization was unable to support adherence to procurement policies for several active contracts under the federal program for fiscal year ending August 31, 2022. Specifically, the Organization failed to maintain documentation history of procurement for four out of the twenty-six active contracts tested that were either paid in full or in part by the Unaccompanied Alien Children Program. All of these contracts were procured at least three years previous. For three of the four contracts the winning proposal and proper approval for the contact was maintained, but no other procurement documentation. For the other contract no procurement history maintained. There were no errors found in any of the contract samples that were procured under the Organization’s current procurement policies. Cause The Organization is aware they are operating under contracts that were procured in previous years that may not have all the records maintained. Reprocuring all of these contracts at once would potentially cause disruptions in operations due to the products/services related those vendors playing an important role in the Organization’s day-to-day operations. As such, the Organization still has several active contracts procured under the old policies that they are working on reprocuring as these contracts’ renewal dates arise, if not earlier. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization could potentially be under contract with vendors that are not the best value, not adequately qualified, potentially suspended or debarred, or otherwise not suitable for contract under federal procurement guidelines. No questioned costs were identified as all services/goods under these contracts were deemed to be allowable under the program, and no exceptions noted for allowable costs/activities for samples that included payment to these vendors. Recommendation The Organization should review all its “legacy” contracts that were procured under the previous procurement policies to determine if there is proper documentation maintained for compliance with applicable procurement guidelines. This includes systematically re-procuring any current contracts not in compliance as soon as feasible. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See corrective action plan.
Criteria Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(b)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The requirements that apply to procurement under grants and cooperative agreements are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.326, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Criteria (continued) Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. The requirements for nonprocurement suspension and debarment are contained in OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, “Debarment and Suspension;” federal awarding agency regulations in Title 2 of the CFR adopting/implementing the OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180; program legislation; and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition The Organization was unable to support adherence to procurement policies for several active contracts under the federal program for fiscal year ending August 31, 2022. Specifically, the Organization failed to maintain documentation history of procurement for four out of the twenty-six active contracts tested that were either paid in full or in part by the Unaccompanied Alien Children Program. All of these contracts were procured at least three years previous. For three of the four contracts the winning proposal and proper approval for the contact was maintained, but no other procurement documentation. For the other contract no procurement history maintained. There were no errors found in any of the contract samples that were procured under the Organization’s current procurement policies. Cause The Organization is aware they are operating under contracts that were procured in previous years that may not have all the records maintained. Reprocuring all of these contracts at once would potentially cause disruptions in operations due to the products/services related those vendors playing an important role in the Organization’s day-to-day operations. As such, the Organization still has several active contracts procured under the old policies that they are working on reprocuring as these contracts’ renewal dates arise, if not earlier. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization could potentially be under contract with vendors that are not the best value, not adequately qualified, potentially suspended or debarred, or otherwise not suitable for contract under federal procurement guidelines. No questioned costs were identified as all services/goods under these contracts were deemed to be allowable under the program, and no exceptions noted for allowable costs/activities for samples that included payment to these vendors. Recommendation The Organization should review all its “legacy” contracts that were procured under the previous procurement policies to determine if there is proper documentation maintained for compliance with applicable procurement guidelines. This includes systematically re-procuring any current contracts not in compliance as soon as feasible. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See corrective action plan.
Criteria Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(b)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The requirements that apply to procurement under grants and cooperative agreements are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.326, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Criteria (continued) Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. The requirements for nonprocurement suspension and debarment are contained in OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, “Debarment and Suspension;” federal awarding agency regulations in Title 2 of the CFR adopting/implementing the OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180; program legislation; and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition The Organization was unable to support adherence to procurement policies for several active contracts under the federal program for fiscal year ending August 31, 2022. Specifically, the Organization failed to maintain documentation history of procurement for four out of the twenty-six active contracts tested that were either paid in full or in part by the Unaccompanied Alien Children Program. All of these contracts were procured at least three years previous. For three of the four contracts the winning proposal and proper approval for the contact was maintained, but no other procurement documentation. For the other contract no procurement history maintained. There were no errors found in any of the contract samples that were procured under the Organization’s current procurement policies. Cause The Organization is aware they are operating under contracts that were procured in previous years that may not have all the records maintained. Reprocuring all of these contracts at once would potentially cause disruptions in operations due to the products/services related those vendors playing an important role in the Organization’s day-to-day operations. As such, the Organization still has several active contracts procured under the old policies that they are working on reprocuring as these contracts’ renewal dates arise, if not earlier. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization could potentially be under contract with vendors that are not the best value, not adequately qualified, potentially suspended or debarred, or otherwise not suitable for contract under federal procurement guidelines. No questioned costs were identified as all services/goods under these contracts were deemed to be allowable under the program, and no exceptions noted for allowable costs/activities for samples that included payment to these vendors. Recommendation The Organization should review all its “legacy” contracts that were procured under the previous procurement policies to determine if there is proper documentation maintained for compliance with applicable procurement guidelines. This includes systematically re-procuring any current contracts not in compliance as soon as feasible. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See corrective action plan.
Criteria Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(b)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The requirements that apply to procurement under grants and cooperative agreements are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.326, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Criteria (continued) Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. The requirements for nonprocurement suspension and debarment are contained in OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, “Debarment and Suspension;” federal awarding agency regulations in Title 2 of the CFR adopting/implementing the OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180; program legislation; and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition The Organization was unable to support adherence to procurement policies for several active contracts under the federal program for fiscal year ending August 31, 2022. Specifically, the Organization failed to maintain documentation history of procurement for four out of the twenty-six active contracts tested that were either paid in full or in part by the Unaccompanied Alien Children Program. All of these contracts were procured at least three years previous. For three of the four contracts the winning proposal and proper approval for the contact was maintained, but no other procurement documentation. For the other contract no procurement history maintained. There were no errors found in any of the contract samples that were procured under the Organization’s current procurement policies. Cause The Organization is aware they are operating under contracts that were procured in previous years that may not have all the records maintained. Reprocuring all of these contracts at once would potentially cause disruptions in operations due to the products/services related those vendors playing an important role in the Organization’s day-to-day operations. As such, the Organization still has several active contracts procured under the old policies that they are working on reprocuring as these contracts’ renewal dates arise, if not earlier. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization could potentially be under contract with vendors that are not the best value, not adequately qualified, potentially suspended or debarred, or otherwise not suitable for contract under federal procurement guidelines. No questioned costs were identified as all services/goods under these contracts were deemed to be allowable under the program, and no exceptions noted for allowable costs/activities for samples that included payment to these vendors. Recommendation The Organization should review all its “legacy” contracts that were procured under the previous procurement policies to determine if there is proper documentation maintained for compliance with applicable procurement guidelines. This includes systematically re-procuring any current contracts not in compliance as soon as feasible. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See corrective action plan.
Criteria Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(b)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The requirements that apply to procurement under grants and cooperative agreements are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.326, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Criteria (continued) Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. The requirements for nonprocurement suspension and debarment are contained in OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, “Debarment and Suspension;” federal awarding agency regulations in Title 2 of the CFR adopting/implementing the OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180; program legislation; and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition The Organization was unable to support adherence to procurement policies for several active contracts under the federal program for fiscal year ending August 31, 2022. Specifically, the Organization failed to maintain documentation history of procurement for four out of the twenty-six active contracts tested that were either paid in full or in part by the Unaccompanied Alien Children Program. All of these contracts were procured at least three years previous. For three of the four contracts the winning proposal and proper approval for the contact was maintained, but no other procurement documentation. For the other contract no procurement history maintained. There were no errors found in any of the contract samples that were procured under the Organization’s current procurement policies. Cause The Organization is aware they are operating under contracts that were procured in previous years that may not have all the records maintained. Reprocuring all of these contracts at once would potentially cause disruptions in operations due to the products/services related those vendors playing an important role in the Organization’s day-to-day operations. As such, the Organization still has several active contracts procured under the old policies that they are working on reprocuring as these contracts’ renewal dates arise, if not earlier. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization could potentially be under contract with vendors that are not the best value, not adequately qualified, potentially suspended or debarred, or otherwise not suitable for contract under federal procurement guidelines. No questioned costs were identified as all services/goods under these contracts were deemed to be allowable under the program, and no exceptions noted for allowable costs/activities for samples that included payment to these vendors. Recommendation The Organization should review all its “legacy” contracts that were procured under the previous procurement policies to determine if there is proper documentation maintained for compliance with applicable procurement guidelines. This includes systematically re-procuring any current contracts not in compliance as soon as feasible. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See corrective action plan.
Criteria Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(b)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The requirements that apply to procurement under grants and cooperative agreements are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.326, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Criteria (continued) Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. The requirements for nonprocurement suspension and debarment are contained in OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, “Debarment and Suspension;” federal awarding agency regulations in Title 2 of the CFR adopting/implementing the OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180; program legislation; and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition The Organization was unable to support adherence to procurement policies for several active contracts under the federal program for fiscal year ending August 31, 2022. Specifically, the Organization failed to maintain documentation history of procurement for four out of the twenty-six active contracts tested that were either paid in full or in part by the Unaccompanied Alien Children Program. All of these contracts were procured at least three years previous. For three of the four contracts the winning proposal and proper approval for the contact was maintained, but no other procurement documentation. For the other contract no procurement history maintained. There were no errors found in any of the contract samples that were procured under the Organization’s current procurement policies. Cause The Organization is aware they are operating under contracts that were procured in previous years that may not have all the records maintained. Reprocuring all of these contracts at once would potentially cause disruptions in operations due to the products/services related those vendors playing an important role in the Organization’s day-to-day operations. As such, the Organization still has several active contracts procured under the old policies that they are working on reprocuring as these contracts’ renewal dates arise, if not earlier. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization could potentially be under contract with vendors that are not the best value, not adequately qualified, potentially suspended or debarred, or otherwise not suitable for contract under federal procurement guidelines. No questioned costs were identified as all services/goods under these contracts were deemed to be allowable under the program, and no exceptions noted for allowable costs/activities for samples that included payment to these vendors. Recommendation The Organization should review all its “legacy” contracts that were procured under the previous procurement policies to determine if there is proper documentation maintained for compliance with applicable procurement guidelines. This includes systematically re-procuring any current contracts not in compliance as soon as feasible. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See corrective action plan.
Criteria Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(b)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The requirements that apply to procurement under grants and cooperative agreements are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.326, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Criteria (continued) Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. The requirements for nonprocurement suspension and debarment are contained in OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, “Debarment and Suspension;” federal awarding agency regulations in Title 2 of the CFR adopting/implementing the OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180; program legislation; and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition The Organization was unable to support adherence to procurement policies for several active contracts under the federal program for fiscal year ending August 31, 2022. Specifically, the Organization failed to maintain documentation history of procurement for four out of the twenty-six active contracts tested that were either paid in full or in part by the Unaccompanied Alien Children Program. All of these contracts were procured at least three years previous. For three of the four contracts the winning proposal and proper approval for the contact was maintained, but no other procurement documentation. For the other contract no procurement history maintained. There were no errors found in any of the contract samples that were procured under the Organization’s current procurement policies. Cause The Organization is aware they are operating under contracts that were procured in previous years that may not have all the records maintained. Reprocuring all of these contracts at once would potentially cause disruptions in operations due to the products/services related those vendors playing an important role in the Organization’s day-to-day operations. As such, the Organization still has several active contracts procured under the old policies that they are working on reprocuring as these contracts’ renewal dates arise, if not earlier. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization could potentially be under contract with vendors that are not the best value, not adequately qualified, potentially suspended or debarred, or otherwise not suitable for contract under federal procurement guidelines. No questioned costs were identified as all services/goods under these contracts were deemed to be allowable under the program, and no exceptions noted for allowable costs/activities for samples that included payment to these vendors. Recommendation The Organization should review all its “legacy” contracts that were procured under the previous procurement policies to determine if there is proper documentation maintained for compliance with applicable procurement guidelines. This includes systematically re-procuring any current contracts not in compliance as soon as feasible. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See corrective action plan.
Criteria Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(b)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The requirements that apply to procurement under grants and cooperative agreements are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.326, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Criteria (continued) Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. The requirements for nonprocurement suspension and debarment are contained in OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, “Debarment and Suspension;” federal awarding agency regulations in Title 2 of the CFR adopting/implementing the OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180; program legislation; and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition The Organization was unable to support adherence to procurement policies for several active contracts under the federal program for fiscal year ending August 31, 2022. Specifically, the Organization failed to maintain documentation history of procurement for four out of the twenty-six active contracts tested that were either paid in full or in part by the Unaccompanied Alien Children Program. All of these contracts were procured at least three years previous. For three of the four contracts the winning proposal and proper approval for the contact was maintained, but no other procurement documentation. For the other contract no procurement history maintained. There were no errors found in any of the contract samples that were procured under the Organization’s current procurement policies. Cause The Organization is aware they are operating under contracts that were procured in previous years that may not have all the records maintained. Reprocuring all of these contracts at once would potentially cause disruptions in operations due to the products/services related those vendors playing an important role in the Organization’s day-to-day operations. As such, the Organization still has several active contracts procured under the old policies that they are working on reprocuring as these contracts’ renewal dates arise, if not earlier. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization could potentially be under contract with vendors that are not the best value, not adequately qualified, potentially suspended or debarred, or otherwise not suitable for contract under federal procurement guidelines. No questioned costs were identified as all services/goods under these contracts were deemed to be allowable under the program, and no exceptions noted for allowable costs/activities for samples that included payment to these vendors. Recommendation The Organization should review all its “legacy” contracts that were procured under the previous procurement policies to determine if there is proper documentation maintained for compliance with applicable procurement guidelines. This includes systematically re-procuring any current contracts not in compliance as soon as feasible. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See corrective action plan.
Criteria Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(b)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The requirements that apply to procurement under grants and cooperative agreements are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.326, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Criteria (continued) Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. The requirements for nonprocurement suspension and debarment are contained in OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, “Debarment and Suspension;” federal awarding agency regulations in Title 2 of the CFR adopting/implementing the OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180; program legislation; and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition The Organization was unable to support adherence to procurement policies for several active contracts under the federal program for fiscal year ending August 31, 2022. Specifically, the Organization failed to maintain documentation history of procurement for four out of the twenty-six active contracts tested that were either paid in full or in part by the Unaccompanied Alien Children Program. All of these contracts were procured at least three years previous. For three of the four contracts the winning proposal and proper approval for the contact was maintained, but no other procurement documentation. For the other contract no procurement history maintained. There were no errors found in any of the contract samples that were procured under the Organization’s current procurement policies. Cause The Organization is aware they are operating under contracts that were procured in previous years that may not have all the records maintained. Reprocuring all of these contracts at once would potentially cause disruptions in operations due to the products/services related those vendors playing an important role in the Organization’s day-to-day operations. As such, the Organization still has several active contracts procured under the old policies that they are working on reprocuring as these contracts’ renewal dates arise, if not earlier. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization could potentially be under contract with vendors that are not the best value, not adequately qualified, potentially suspended or debarred, or otherwise not suitable for contract under federal procurement guidelines. No questioned costs were identified as all services/goods under these contracts were deemed to be allowable under the program, and no exceptions noted for allowable costs/activities for samples that included payment to these vendors. Recommendation The Organization should review all its “legacy” contracts that were procured under the previous procurement policies to determine if there is proper documentation maintained for compliance with applicable procurement guidelines. This includes systematically re-procuring any current contracts not in compliance as soon as feasible. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See corrective action plan.
Criteria Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(b)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The requirements that apply to procurement under grants and cooperative agreements are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.326, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Criteria (continued) Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. The requirements for nonprocurement suspension and debarment are contained in OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, “Debarment and Suspension;” federal awarding agency regulations in Title 2 of the CFR adopting/implementing the OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180; program legislation; and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition The Organization was unable to support adherence to procurement policies for several active contracts under the federal program for fiscal year ending August 31, 2022. Specifically, the Organization failed to maintain documentation history of procurement for four out of the twenty-six active contracts tested that were either paid in full or in part by the Unaccompanied Alien Children Program. All of these contracts were procured at least three years previous. For three of the four contracts the winning proposal and proper approval for the contact was maintained, but no other procurement documentation. For the other contract no procurement history maintained. There were no errors found in any of the contract samples that were procured under the Organization’s current procurement policies. Cause The Organization is aware they are operating under contracts that were procured in previous years that may not have all the records maintained. Reprocuring all of these contracts at once would potentially cause disruptions in operations due to the products/services related those vendors playing an important role in the Organization’s day-to-day operations. As such, the Organization still has several active contracts procured under the old policies that they are working on reprocuring as these contracts’ renewal dates arise, if not earlier. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization could potentially be under contract with vendors that are not the best value, not adequately qualified, potentially suspended or debarred, or otherwise not suitable for contract under federal procurement guidelines. No questioned costs were identified as all services/goods under these contracts were deemed to be allowable under the program, and no exceptions noted for allowable costs/activities for samples that included payment to these vendors. Recommendation The Organization should review all its “legacy” contracts that were procured under the previous procurement policies to determine if there is proper documentation maintained for compliance with applicable procurement guidelines. This includes systematically re-procuring any current contracts not in compliance as soon as feasible. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See corrective action plan.
Criteria Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(b)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The requirements that apply to procurement under grants and cooperative agreements are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.326, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Criteria (continued) Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. The requirements for nonprocurement suspension and debarment are contained in OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, “Debarment and Suspension;” federal awarding agency regulations in Title 2 of the CFR adopting/implementing the OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180; program legislation; and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition The Organization was unable to support adherence to procurement policies for several active contracts under the federal program for fiscal year ending August 31, 2022. Specifically, the Organization failed to maintain documentation history of procurement for four out of the twenty-six active contracts tested that were either paid in full or in part by the Unaccompanied Alien Children Program. All of these contracts were procured at least three years previous. For three of the four contracts the winning proposal and proper approval for the contact was maintained, but no other procurement documentation. For the other contract no procurement history maintained. There were no errors found in any of the contract samples that were procured under the Organization’s current procurement policies. Cause The Organization is aware they are operating under contracts that were procured in previous years that may not have all the records maintained. Reprocuring all of these contracts at once would potentially cause disruptions in operations due to the products/services related those vendors playing an important role in the Organization’s day-to-day operations. As such, the Organization still has several active contracts procured under the old policies that they are working on reprocuring as these contracts’ renewal dates arise, if not earlier. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization could potentially be under contract with vendors that are not the best value, not adequately qualified, potentially suspended or debarred, or otherwise not suitable for contract under federal procurement guidelines. No questioned costs were identified as all services/goods under these contracts were deemed to be allowable under the program, and no exceptions noted for allowable costs/activities for samples that included payment to these vendors. Recommendation The Organization should review all its “legacy” contracts that were procured under the previous procurement policies to determine if there is proper documentation maintained for compliance with applicable procurement guidelines. This includes systematically re-procuring any current contracts not in compliance as soon as feasible. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See corrective action plan.
Criteria Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(b)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The requirements that apply to procurement under grants and cooperative agreements are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.326, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Criteria (continued) Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. The requirements for nonprocurement suspension and debarment are contained in OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, “Debarment and Suspension;” federal awarding agency regulations in Title 2 of the CFR adopting/implementing the OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180; program legislation; and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition The Organization was unable to support adherence to procurement policies for several active contracts under the federal program for fiscal year ending August 31, 2022. Specifically, the Organization failed to maintain documentation history of procurement for four out of the twenty-six active contracts tested that were either paid in full or in part by the Unaccompanied Alien Children Program. All of these contracts were procured at least three years previous. For three of the four contracts the winning proposal and proper approval for the contact was maintained, but no other procurement documentation. For the other contract no procurement history maintained. There were no errors found in any of the contract samples that were procured under the Organization’s current procurement policies. Cause The Organization is aware they are operating under contracts that were procured in previous years that may not have all the records maintained. Reprocuring all of these contracts at once would potentially cause disruptions in operations due to the products/services related those vendors playing an important role in the Organization’s day-to-day operations. As such, the Organization still has several active contracts procured under the old policies that they are working on reprocuring as these contracts’ renewal dates arise, if not earlier. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization could potentially be under contract with vendors that are not the best value, not adequately qualified, potentially suspended or debarred, or otherwise not suitable for contract under federal procurement guidelines. No questioned costs were identified as all services/goods under these contracts were deemed to be allowable under the program, and no exceptions noted for allowable costs/activities for samples that included payment to these vendors. Recommendation The Organization should review all its “legacy” contracts that were procured under the previous procurement policies to determine if there is proper documentation maintained for compliance with applicable procurement guidelines. This includes systematically re-procuring any current contracts not in compliance as soon as feasible. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See corrective action plan.
Criteria Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(b)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The requirements that apply to procurement under grants and cooperative agreements are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.326, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Criteria (continued) Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. The requirements for nonprocurement suspension and debarment are contained in OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, “Debarment and Suspension;” federal awarding agency regulations in Title 2 of the CFR adopting/implementing the OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180; program legislation; and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition The Organization was unable to support adherence to procurement policies for several active contracts under the federal program for fiscal year ending August 31, 2022. Specifically, the Organization failed to maintain documentation history of procurement for four out of the twenty-six active contracts tested that were either paid in full or in part by the Unaccompanied Alien Children Program. All of these contracts were procured at least three years previous. For three of the four contracts the winning proposal and proper approval for the contact was maintained, but no other procurement documentation. For the other contract no procurement history maintained. There were no errors found in any of the contract samples that were procured under the Organization’s current procurement policies. Cause The Organization is aware they are operating under contracts that were procured in previous years that may not have all the records maintained. Reprocuring all of these contracts at once would potentially cause disruptions in operations due to the products/services related those vendors playing an important role in the Organization’s day-to-day operations. As such, the Organization still has several active contracts procured under the old policies that they are working on reprocuring as these contracts’ renewal dates arise, if not earlier. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization could potentially be under contract with vendors that are not the best value, not adequately qualified, potentially suspended or debarred, or otherwise not suitable for contract under federal procurement guidelines. No questioned costs were identified as all services/goods under these contracts were deemed to be allowable under the program, and no exceptions noted for allowable costs/activities for samples that included payment to these vendors. Recommendation The Organization should review all its “legacy” contracts that were procured under the previous procurement policies to determine if there is proper documentation maintained for compliance with applicable procurement guidelines. This includes systematically re-procuring any current contracts not in compliance as soon as feasible. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See corrective action plan.
Criteria Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(b)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The requirements that apply to procurement under grants and cooperative agreements are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.326, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Criteria (continued) Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. The requirements for nonprocurement suspension and debarment are contained in OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, “Debarment and Suspension;” federal awarding agency regulations in Title 2 of the CFR adopting/implementing the OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180; program legislation; and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition The Organization was unable to support adherence to procurement policies for several active contracts under the federal program for fiscal year ending August 31, 2022. Specifically, the Organization failed to maintain documentation history of procurement for four out of the twenty-six active contracts tested that were either paid in full or in part by the Unaccompanied Alien Children Program. All of these contracts were procured at least three years previous. For three of the four contracts the winning proposal and proper approval for the contact was maintained, but no other procurement documentation. For the other contract no procurement history maintained. There were no errors found in any of the contract samples that were procured under the Organization’s current procurement policies. Cause The Organization is aware they are operating under contracts that were procured in previous years that may not have all the records maintained. Reprocuring all of these contracts at once would potentially cause disruptions in operations due to the products/services related those vendors playing an important role in the Organization’s day-to-day operations. As such, the Organization still has several active contracts procured under the old policies that they are working on reprocuring as these contracts’ renewal dates arise, if not earlier. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization could potentially be under contract with vendors that are not the best value, not adequately qualified, potentially suspended or debarred, or otherwise not suitable for contract under federal procurement guidelines. No questioned costs were identified as all services/goods under these contracts were deemed to be allowable under the program, and no exceptions noted for allowable costs/activities for samples that included payment to these vendors. Recommendation The Organization should review all its “legacy” contracts that were procured under the previous procurement policies to determine if there is proper documentation maintained for compliance with applicable procurement guidelines. This includes systematically re-procuring any current contracts not in compliance as soon as feasible. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See corrective action plan.
Criteria Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(b)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The requirements that apply to procurement under grants and cooperative agreements are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.326, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Criteria (continued) Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. The requirements for nonprocurement suspension and debarment are contained in OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, “Debarment and Suspension;” federal awarding agency regulations in Title 2 of the CFR adopting/implementing the OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180; program legislation; and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition The Organization was unable to support adherence to procurement policies for several active contracts under the federal program for fiscal year ending August 31, 2022. Specifically, the Organization failed to maintain documentation history of procurement for four out of the twenty-six active contracts tested that were either paid in full or in part by the Unaccompanied Alien Children Program. All of these contracts were procured at least three years previous. For three of the four contracts the winning proposal and proper approval for the contact was maintained, but no other procurement documentation. For the other contract no procurement history maintained. There were no errors found in any of the contract samples that were procured under the Organization’s current procurement policies. Cause The Organization is aware they are operating under contracts that were procured in previous years that may not have all the records maintained. Reprocuring all of these contracts at once would potentially cause disruptions in operations due to the products/services related those vendors playing an important role in the Organization’s day-to-day operations. As such, the Organization still has several active contracts procured under the old policies that they are working on reprocuring as these contracts’ renewal dates arise, if not earlier. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization could potentially be under contract with vendors that are not the best value, not adequately qualified, potentially suspended or debarred, or otherwise not suitable for contract under federal procurement guidelines. No questioned costs were identified as all services/goods under these contracts were deemed to be allowable under the program, and no exceptions noted for allowable costs/activities for samples that included payment to these vendors. Recommendation The Organization should review all its “legacy” contracts that were procured under the previous procurement policies to determine if there is proper documentation maintained for compliance with applicable procurement guidelines. This includes systematically re-procuring any current contracts not in compliance as soon as feasible. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See corrective action plan.
Criteria Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(b)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The requirements that apply to procurement under grants and cooperative agreements are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.326, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Criteria (continued) Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. The requirements for nonprocurement suspension and debarment are contained in OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, “Debarment and Suspension;” federal awarding agency regulations in Title 2 of the CFR adopting/implementing the OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180; program legislation; and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition The Organization was unable to support adherence to procurement policies for several active contracts under the federal program for fiscal year ending August 31, 2022. Specifically, the Organization failed to maintain documentation history of procurement for four out of the twenty-six active contracts tested that were either paid in full or in part by the Unaccompanied Alien Children Program. All of these contracts were procured at least three years previous. For three of the four contracts the winning proposal and proper approval for the contact was maintained, but no other procurement documentation. For the other contract no procurement history maintained. There were no errors found in any of the contract samples that were procured under the Organization’s current procurement policies. Cause The Organization is aware they are operating under contracts that were procured in previous years that may not have all the records maintained. Reprocuring all of these contracts at once would potentially cause disruptions in operations due to the products/services related those vendors playing an important role in the Organization’s day-to-day operations. As such, the Organization still has several active contracts procured under the old policies that they are working on reprocuring as these contracts’ renewal dates arise, if not earlier. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization could potentially be under contract with vendors that are not the best value, not adequately qualified, potentially suspended or debarred, or otherwise not suitable for contract under federal procurement guidelines. No questioned costs were identified as all services/goods under these contracts were deemed to be allowable under the program, and no exceptions noted for allowable costs/activities for samples that included payment to these vendors. Recommendation The Organization should review all its “legacy” contracts that were procured under the previous procurement policies to determine if there is proper documentation maintained for compliance with applicable procurement guidelines. This includes systematically re-procuring any current contracts not in compliance as soon as feasible. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See corrective action plan.