Procurement Suspension & Debarment Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Material Noncompliance Research and Development Cluster Criteria: Non-federal entities other than states must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurement standards conform to the applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200. Condition: The Organization has a procurement policy in place; however, the Organization is not consistently following the procurement policy. During the period of the contracts with these provisions, the Organization did not have a control structure in place to monitor compliance with procurement requirements. Consequently, for four (4) of four (4) contracts tested, the procurement policy was not followed and no documentation to reflect compliance with Uniform Guidance requirements related to procurement could be provided. Cause: The Organization did not have proper controls in place to monitor compliance with the procurement. Effect or potential effect: The procurement policy retained by the Organization has not been updated to confirm to the Organization’s current operations. The Organization could become noncompliant with the requirements of the Uniform Guidance, resulting in findings and questioned costs related to dollar amounts being expended to vendors. Additionally, the Organization could become ineligible to receive funds from federal entities or may have to issue refunds to federal entities. Questioned costs: None Context: Our sample was not intended to be statistically valid. Recommendation: The Organization should update its procurement policy to reflect current operations. Additionally, the Organization should review the current procurement operations in conjunction with the review of the procurement policies to ensure that all practices and policies conform to the standards promulgated by the CFR. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management's response is reported in "Management's Views and Corrective Action Plan" included at the end of this report. Identification of prior year finding: 2022-003
Procurement Suspension & Debarment Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Material Noncompliance Research and Development Cluster Criteria: Non-federal entities other than states must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurement standards conform to the applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200. Condition: The Organization has a procurement policy in place; however, the Organization is not consistently following the procurement policy. During the period of the contracts with these provisions, the Organization did not have a control structure in place to monitor compliance with procurement requirements. Consequently, for four (4) of four (4) contracts tested, the procurement policy was not followed and no documentation to reflect compliance with Uniform Guidance requirements related to procurement could be provided. Cause: The Organization did not have proper controls in place to monitor compliance with the procurement. Effect or potential effect: The procurement policy retained by the Organization has not been updated to confirm to the Organization’s current operations. The Organization could become noncompliant with the requirements of the Uniform Guidance, resulting in findings and questioned costs related to dollar amounts being expended to vendors. Additionally, the Organization could become ineligible to receive funds from federal entities or may have to issue refunds to federal entities. Questioned costs: None Context: Our sample was not intended to be statistically valid. Recommendation: The Organization should update its procurement policy to reflect current operations. Additionally, the Organization should review the current procurement operations in conjunction with the review of the procurement policies to ensure that all practices and policies conform to the standards promulgated by the CFR. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management's response is reported in "Management's Views and Corrective Action Plan" included at the end of this report. Identification of prior year finding: 2022-003
Procurement Suspension & Debarment Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Material Noncompliance Research and Development Cluster Criteria: Non-federal entities other than states must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurement standards conform to the applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200. Condition: The Organization has a procurement policy in place; however, the Organization is not consistently following the procurement policy. During the period of the contracts with these provisions, the Organization did not have a control structure in place to monitor compliance with procurement requirements. Consequently, for four (4) of four (4) contracts tested, the procurement policy was not followed and no documentation to reflect compliance with Uniform Guidance requirements related to procurement could be provided. Cause: The Organization did not have proper controls in place to monitor compliance with the procurement. Effect or potential effect: The procurement policy retained by the Organization has not been updated to confirm to the Organization’s current operations. The Organization could become noncompliant with the requirements of the Uniform Guidance, resulting in findings and questioned costs related to dollar amounts being expended to vendors. Additionally, the Organization could become ineligible to receive funds from federal entities or may have to issue refunds to federal entities. Questioned costs: None Context: Our sample was not intended to be statistically valid. Recommendation: The Organization should update its procurement policy to reflect current operations. Additionally, the Organization should review the current procurement operations in conjunction with the review of the procurement policies to ensure that all practices and policies conform to the standards promulgated by the CFR. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management's response is reported in "Management's Views and Corrective Action Plan" included at the end of this report. Identification of prior year finding: 2022-003
Procurement Suspension & Debarment Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Material Noncompliance Research and Development Cluster Criteria: Non-federal entities other than states must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurement standards conform to the applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200. Condition: The Organization has a procurement policy in place; however, the Organization is not consistently following the procurement policy. During the period of the contracts with these provisions, the Organization did not have a control structure in place to monitor compliance with procurement requirements. Consequently, for four (4) of four (4) contracts tested, the procurement policy was not followed and no documentation to reflect compliance with Uniform Guidance requirements related to procurement could be provided. Cause: The Organization did not have proper controls in place to monitor compliance with the procurement. Effect or potential effect: The procurement policy retained by the Organization has not been updated to confirm to the Organization’s current operations. The Organization could become noncompliant with the requirements of the Uniform Guidance, resulting in findings and questioned costs related to dollar amounts being expended to vendors. Additionally, the Organization could become ineligible to receive funds from federal entities or may have to issue refunds to federal entities. Questioned costs: None Context: Our sample was not intended to be statistically valid. Recommendation: The Organization should update its procurement policy to reflect current operations. Additionally, the Organization should review the current procurement operations in conjunction with the review of the procurement policies to ensure that all practices and policies conform to the standards promulgated by the CFR. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management's response is reported in "Management's Views and Corrective Action Plan" included at the end of this report. Identification of prior year finding: 2022-003
Procurement Suspension & Debarment Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Material Noncompliance Research and Development Cluster Criteria: Non-federal entities other than states must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurement standards conform to the applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200. Condition: The Organization has a procurement policy in place; however, the Organization is not consistently following the procurement policy. During the period of the contracts with these provisions, the Organization did not have a control structure in place to monitor compliance with procurement requirements. Consequently, for four (4) of four (4) contracts tested, the procurement policy was not followed and no documentation to reflect compliance with Uniform Guidance requirements related to procurement could be provided. Cause: The Organization did not have proper controls in place to monitor compliance with the procurement. Effect or potential effect: The procurement policy retained by the Organization has not been updated to confirm to the Organization’s current operations. The Organization could become noncompliant with the requirements of the Uniform Guidance, resulting in findings and questioned costs related to dollar amounts being expended to vendors. Additionally, the Organization could become ineligible to receive funds from federal entities or may have to issue refunds to federal entities. Questioned costs: None Context: Our sample was not intended to be statistically valid. Recommendation: The Organization should update its procurement policy to reflect current operations. Additionally, the Organization should review the current procurement operations in conjunction with the review of the procurement policies to ensure that all practices and policies conform to the standards promulgated by the CFR. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management's response is reported in "Management's Views and Corrective Action Plan" included at the end of this report. Identification of prior year finding: 2022-003
Procurement Suspension & Debarment Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Material Noncompliance Research and Development Cluster Criteria: Non-federal entities other than states must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurement standards conform to the applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200. Condition: The Organization has a procurement policy in place; however, the Organization is not consistently following the procurement policy. During the period of the contracts with these provisions, the Organization did not have a control structure in place to monitor compliance with procurement requirements. Consequently, for four (4) of four (4) contracts tested, the procurement policy was not followed and no documentation to reflect compliance with Uniform Guidance requirements related to procurement could be provided. Cause: The Organization did not have proper controls in place to monitor compliance with the procurement. Effect or potential effect: The procurement policy retained by the Organization has not been updated to confirm to the Organization’s current operations. The Organization could become noncompliant with the requirements of the Uniform Guidance, resulting in findings and questioned costs related to dollar amounts being expended to vendors. Additionally, the Organization could become ineligible to receive funds from federal entities or may have to issue refunds to federal entities. Questioned costs: None Context: Our sample was not intended to be statistically valid. Recommendation: The Organization should update its procurement policy to reflect current operations. Additionally, the Organization should review the current procurement operations in conjunction with the review of the procurement policies to ensure that all practices and policies conform to the standards promulgated by the CFR. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management's response is reported in "Management's Views and Corrective Action Plan" included at the end of this report. Identification of prior year finding: 2022-003
Procurement Suspension & Debarment Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Material Noncompliance Research and Development Cluster Criteria: Non-federal entities other than states must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurement standards conform to the applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200. Condition: The Organization has a procurement policy in place; however, the Organization is not consistently following the procurement policy. During the period of the contracts with these provisions, the Organization did not have a control structure in place to monitor compliance with procurement requirements. Consequently, for four (4) of four (4) contracts tested, the procurement policy was not followed and no documentation to reflect compliance with Uniform Guidance requirements related to procurement could be provided. Cause: The Organization did not have proper controls in place to monitor compliance with the procurement. Effect or potential effect: The procurement policy retained by the Organization has not been updated to confirm to the Organization’s current operations. The Organization could become noncompliant with the requirements of the Uniform Guidance, resulting in findings and questioned costs related to dollar amounts being expended to vendors. Additionally, the Organization could become ineligible to receive funds from federal entities or may have to issue refunds to federal entities. Questioned costs: None Context: Our sample was not intended to be statistically valid. Recommendation: The Organization should update its procurement policy to reflect current operations. Additionally, the Organization should review the current procurement operations in conjunction with the review of the procurement policies to ensure that all practices and policies conform to the standards promulgated by the CFR. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management's response is reported in "Management's Views and Corrective Action Plan" included at the end of this report. Identification of prior year finding: 2022-003
Procurement Suspension & Debarment Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Material Noncompliance Research and Development Cluster Criteria: Non-federal entities other than states must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurement standards conform to the applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200. Condition: The Organization has a procurement policy in place; however, the Organization is not consistently following the procurement policy. During the period of the contracts with these provisions, the Organization did not have a control structure in place to monitor compliance with procurement requirements. Consequently, for four (4) of four (4) contracts tested, the procurement policy was not followed and no documentation to reflect compliance with Uniform Guidance requirements related to procurement could be provided. Cause: The Organization did not have proper controls in place to monitor compliance with the procurement. Effect or potential effect: The procurement policy retained by the Organization has not been updated to confirm to the Organization’s current operations. The Organization could become noncompliant with the requirements of the Uniform Guidance, resulting in findings and questioned costs related to dollar amounts being expended to vendors. Additionally, the Organization could become ineligible to receive funds from federal entities or may have to issue refunds to federal entities. Questioned costs: None Context: Our sample was not intended to be statistically valid. Recommendation: The Organization should update its procurement policy to reflect current operations. Additionally, the Organization should review the current procurement operations in conjunction with the review of the procurement policies to ensure that all practices and policies conform to the standards promulgated by the CFR. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management's response is reported in "Management's Views and Corrective Action Plan" included at the end of this report. Identification of prior year finding: 2022-003
Procurement Suspension & Debarment Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Material Noncompliance Research and Development Cluster Criteria: Non-federal entities other than states must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurement standards conform to the applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200. Condition: The Organization has a procurement policy in place; however, the Organization is not consistently following the procurement policy. During the period of the contracts with these provisions, the Organization did not have a control structure in place to monitor compliance with procurement requirements. Consequently, for four (4) of four (4) contracts tested, the procurement policy was not followed and no documentation to reflect compliance with Uniform Guidance requirements related to procurement could be provided. Cause: The Organization did not have proper controls in place to monitor compliance with the procurement. Effect or potential effect: The procurement policy retained by the Organization has not been updated to confirm to the Organization’s current operations. The Organization could become noncompliant with the requirements of the Uniform Guidance, resulting in findings and questioned costs related to dollar amounts being expended to vendors. Additionally, the Organization could become ineligible to receive funds from federal entities or may have to issue refunds to federal entities. Questioned costs: None Context: Our sample was not intended to be statistically valid. Recommendation: The Organization should update its procurement policy to reflect current operations. Additionally, the Organization should review the current procurement operations in conjunction with the review of the procurement policies to ensure that all practices and policies conform to the standards promulgated by the CFR. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management's response is reported in "Management's Views and Corrective Action Plan" included at the end of this report. Identification of prior year finding: 2022-003
Procurement Suspension & Debarment Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Material Noncompliance Research and Development Cluster Criteria: Non-federal entities other than states must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurement standards conform to the applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200. Condition: The Organization has a procurement policy in place; however, the Organization is not consistently following the procurement policy. During the period of the contracts with these provisions, the Organization did not have a control structure in place to monitor compliance with procurement requirements. Consequently, for four (4) of four (4) contracts tested, the procurement policy was not followed and no documentation to reflect compliance with Uniform Guidance requirements related to procurement could be provided. Cause: The Organization did not have proper controls in place to monitor compliance with the procurement. Effect or potential effect: The procurement policy retained by the Organization has not been updated to confirm to the Organization’s current operations. The Organization could become noncompliant with the requirements of the Uniform Guidance, resulting in findings and questioned costs related to dollar amounts being expended to vendors. Additionally, the Organization could become ineligible to receive funds from federal entities or may have to issue refunds to federal entities. Questioned costs: None Context: Our sample was not intended to be statistically valid. Recommendation: The Organization should update its procurement policy to reflect current operations. Additionally, the Organization should review the current procurement operations in conjunction with the review of the procurement policies to ensure that all practices and policies conform to the standards promulgated by the CFR. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management's response is reported in "Management's Views and Corrective Action Plan" included at the end of this report. Identification of prior year finding: 2022-003
2023-001 Improve Controls and Documentation Over Procurement Federal Agency: U.S. Department of the Treasury Cluster/Program: COVID-19 – Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund AL Numbers: 21.027 Award Year: 2023 Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Type of Finding Compliance Internal Control over Compliance - Significant Deficiency Criteria or Specific Requirement Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. Local municipalities are also required to use the same state procurement policies and procedures for federal funds as for non-federal funds, the Town is required to follow Massachusetts General Laws, Chapter (MGL) 30(b). MGL 30(b) requires the solicitation of three written or oral quotes for procurements of supplies between $10,000 and $49,999 and sealed bids or proposals for procurements of supplies $50,000 and over. Management of the Town is also responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over compliance with federal requirements that have a direct and material effect on a federal program. A deficiency in internal control over compliance exists when the design or operation of a control over compliance does not allow management or employees, in the normal course of performing their assigned functions, to prevent, or detect and correct, noncompliance with a type of compliance requirement of a federal program on a timely basis. Condition and Context There was no evidence to support that one disbursement properly followed the procurement process before payments for services were made to the vendor. Cause Weaknesses in the design and operation of controls. 2023-001 Improve Controls and Documentation Over Procurement (Continued) Effect or Potential Effect Due to the weaknesses in internal controls noted above, there is a risk that procurements may be awarded to vendors in a manner that is not consistent with federal procurement requirements. Known questioned costs are reported equal to $82,800, as follows: AL Questioned Number(s) Name of Federal Program or Cluster Costs 21.027 COVID-19 – Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund $82,800 Recommendation The Town should address the weaknesses in internal controls noted above in order to ensure that federal procurements are conducted in accordance with federal and state requirements. Views of Responsible Official Management agrees with the finding. Planned Corrective Action Management’s corrective action plan is included at the end of this report after the Schedule of Prior Year Findings.
2023-009 Wage Compliance (Repeat Finding 2021/2022-011) CFDA Title: Impact Aid CFDA Number: 84.041 Federal Award Number: 2023 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-through Entity: Direct Condition: The District did not comply with the wage rate compliance related to the teacher housing civil construction project or the locker room remodel for expenditures paid from Impact Aid monies. Criteria: Section 7007 construction funds, as well as any Section 7002 or 7003(b) funds spent for construction or minor remodeling, are subject to Wage Rate Requirements (20 USC 1232b). Compliance Requirement - All laborers and mechanics employed by contractors or subcontractors to work on construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by Federal assistance funds must be paid wages not less than those established for the locality of the project (prevailing wage rates) by the Department of Labor (DOL) (40 USC 3141-3144, 3146, and 3147). Non-federal entities shall include in their construction contracts subject to the Wage Rate Requirements (which still may be referenced as the Davis-Bacon Act) a provision that the contractor or subcontractor comply with those requirements and the DOL regulations (29 CFR part 5, Labor Standards Provisions Applicable to Contacts Governing Federally Financed and Assisted Construction). This includes a requirement for the contractor or subcontractor to submit to the non-Federal entity weekly, for each week in which any contract work is performed, a copy of the payroll and a statement of compliance (certified payrolls) (29 CFR sections 5.5 and 5.6; the A-102 Common Rule (section 36(i)(5)); OMB Circular A-110 (2 CFR part 215, Appendix A, Contract Provisions); 2 CFR part 176, subpart C; and 2 CFR section 200.326). Context: During the testing of significant claims for the Impact Aid major program related to construction, we noted claims in which there should be contracts in place and that the wage rate requirements would apply. Effect: Noncompliance with the Wage Rate Requirement for the teacher housing civil construction project, and the locker room remodel project. Cause: The District was not aware of the requirement. Recommendation: The District should implement internal controls to determine the federal compliance requirements of all federal funds received. In addition, procedures should be implemented to ensure any federal funds received in which the Wage Rate Requirement is required the following are implemented: 1. any construction vendor is by contract, and that contract includes the Prevailing Wage clauses for the contractors and subcontractors 2. the weekly certified payrolls are submitted
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of the Treasury Federal Program Name: COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Federal Award Identification Number: SLFRP0128 Grant Year: 2021 Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Pass-Through Agency: State of Connecticut Office of Policy and Management Pass-Through Number(s): 12060-OPM20600-29669 Award Period: June 7, 2021, through December 31, 2026 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Other Matters Criteria or Specific Requirement: The City must comply with procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 within Uniform Guidance including the verification that an entity with which the City plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded. Condition: The Cities procurement standards do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Policies regarding verification of compliance with suspension and debarment requirements were not found. Questioned Costs: None Context: Although the City did not have a policy in place in conformity with the federal Uniform Guidance criteria the population of expenditures requiring testing were immaterial or otherwise excluded from testing requirements. Effect: With the absence of a compliant policy, the City could process transactions that do not follow federal Uniform Guidance procurement standards. Repeat Finding: Yes, 2022-004 Cause: The City was in the process of updating their policy to be in line with the Uniform Guidance procurement standards, but was unable to finalize the policy prior to incurring allowable costs. Recommendation: We recommend the City comply with procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 within Uniform Guidance including the verification that an entity with which the City plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the auditors’ recommendations.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of the Treasury Federal Program Name: COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Federal Award Identification Number: SLFRP0128 Grant Year: 2021 Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Pass-Through Agency: State of Connecticut Office of Policy and Management Pass-Through Number(s): 12060-OPM20600-29669 Award Period: June 7, 2021, through December 31, 2026 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Other Matters Criteria or Specific Requirement: The City must comply with procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 within Uniform Guidance including the verification that an entity with which the City plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded. Condition: The Cities procurement standards do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Policies regarding verification of compliance with suspension and debarment requirements were not found. Questioned Costs: None Context: Although the City did not have a policy in place in conformity with the federal Uniform Guidance criteria the population of expenditures requiring testing were immaterial or otherwise excluded from testing requirements. Effect: With the absence of a compliant policy, the City could process transactions that do not follow federal Uniform Guidance procurement standards. Repeat Finding: Yes, 2022-004 Cause: The City was in the process of updating their policy to be in line with the Uniform Guidance procurement standards, but was unable to finalize the policy prior to incurring allowable costs. Recommendation: We recommend the City comply with procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 within Uniform Guidance including the verification that an entity with which the City plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the auditors’ recommendations.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of the Treasury Federal Program Name: COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Federal Award Identification Number: SLFRP0128 Grant Year: 2021 Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Pass-Through Agency: State of Connecticut Office of Policy and Management Pass-Through Number(s): 12060-OPM20600-29669 Award Period: June 7, 2021, through December 31, 2026 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Other Matters Criteria or Specific Requirement: The City must comply with procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 within Uniform Guidance including the verification that an entity with which the City plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded. Condition: The Cities procurement standards do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Policies regarding verification of compliance with suspension and debarment requirements were not found. Questioned Costs: None Context: Although the City did not have a policy in place in conformity with the federal Uniform Guidance criteria the population of expenditures requiring testing were immaterial or otherwise excluded from testing requirements. Effect: With the absence of a compliant policy, the City could process transactions that do not follow federal Uniform Guidance procurement standards. Repeat Finding: Yes, 2022-004 Cause: The City was in the process of updating their policy to be in line with the Uniform Guidance procurement standards, but was unable to finalize the policy prior to incurring allowable costs. Recommendation: We recommend the City comply with procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 within Uniform Guidance including the verification that an entity with which the City plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the auditors’ recommendations.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of the Treasury Federal Program Name: COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Federal Award Identification Number: SLFRP0128 Grant Year: 2021 Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Pass-Through Agency: State of Connecticut Office of Policy and Management Pass-Through Number(s): 12060-OPM20600-29669 Award Period: June 7, 2021, through December 31, 2026 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Other Matters Criteria or Specific Requirement: The City must comply with procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 within Uniform Guidance including the verification that an entity with which the City plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded. Condition: The Cities procurement standards do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Policies regarding verification of compliance with suspension and debarment requirements were not found. Questioned Costs: None Context: Although the City did not have a policy in place in conformity with the federal Uniform Guidance criteria the population of expenditures requiring testing were immaterial or otherwise excluded from testing requirements. Effect: With the absence of a compliant policy, the City could process transactions that do not follow federal Uniform Guidance procurement standards. Repeat Finding: Yes, 2022-004 Cause: The City was in the process of updating their policy to be in line with the Uniform Guidance procurement standards, but was unable to finalize the policy prior to incurring allowable costs. Recommendation: We recommend the City comply with procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 within Uniform Guidance including the verification that an entity with which the City plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the auditors’ recommendations.
Finding Type. Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance and Immaterial Noncompliance (Procurement and Suspension and Debarment) Program. Drinking Water State Revolving Fund Cluster (CFDA# 66.468); U.S. Department of Environmental Protection Agency; Passed through the Oregon Infrastructure Finance Authority of the Oregon Business Development Department; Project number S22008. Criteria. Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. Condition. The District did not have documented procurement standards to comply with 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Cause. The District was not aware that written policies were required for these areas in accordance with 2 CFR Part 200. Effect. As a result of this condition, the District did not fully comply with 2 CFR Part 200 applicable to the above noted grant. Questioned Costs. No costs have been questioned as a result of this finding. Recommendation. We recommend that the District develop a policy as soon as practical, but no later than the end of fiscal year 2024, to comply with 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. View of Responsible Officials. We agree with the recommendation and will develop procedures to comply with the Uniform Guidance applicable to grants.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION PASSED THROUGH ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION COVID-19 AMERICAN RESCUE PLAN - ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY SCHOOL EMERGENCY RELIEF FUND - AL NUMBER 84.425D AND 84.425U PASS-THROUGH NUMBER 5703 AUDIT PERIOD - YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2023 2023-002.Equipment and Real Property Management / Special Tests and Provisions Criteria or specific requirement: 29 CFR 5.5 (Wage Rate Requirements) requires all contractors and subcontractors performing construction contracts in excess of $2,000, financed by federal assistance funds, to pay laborers and mechanics employed by the contractor or subcontractor not less than the prevailing wage rates as determined by the Department of Labor for the locality of the project. Non-federal entities shall include in the applicable construction contracts a provision that the contractor or subcontractor comply with those requirements. Such requirements include the submission of weekly certified payrolls for each week in which any contract work is performed, to the non-federal entities. 2 CFR 200.311 requires property records be maintained for real property and improvements made to real property acquired with federal awards. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.326 and Ark. Code Ann. § 18-44-503 require a non-federal entity to obtain a performance bond for the public construction contract. Condition: The District paid $1,322,196 for a capital improvement flooring project from the Education Stabilization Fund without obtaining a performance bond and without obtaining a written contract that included the prevailing wage rate provision, and weekly certified payrolls were not submitted to the District. Additionally, the District did not record in the capital assets subsidiary records capital improvements for a HVAC system or flooring project totaling $154,377 and $1,322,196, respectively, and for equipment totaling $12,138. Cause: Lack of internal controls and management oversight. Effect or potential effect: The District did not comply with Wage Rate Requirements or Bonding Requirements. The District's capital assets subsidiary records were not accurate. Questioned costs:Context: A population of 20 payments for capital improvements and equipment totaling $1,525,445. All were examined. Identification as a repeat finding: No Recommendation: The District should contact the Arkansas Division of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE) for guidance regarding this matter and implement proper controls over program expenditures. Views of responsible officials: The Department of Elementary and Secondary Education will be contacted regarding this matter. The district did not receive guidance from the Department about this issue other than stating that Davis-Bacon wage rules apply. Those materials will be recorded as capital assets and our new capital assets clerk will be trained on the definition and record keeping of such items. This likely occurred simply from the fact that yearly past practice for the district has been to enter the asset as one item in the asset system. Construction in progress has been used as a reconciliation item in fixed assets. There must have been some misunderstanding on this matter because the district does have a statement of coverage for the company that did this work and will provide it. However, if the format is wrong, the district will, in the future, insist that the proper format be used.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION PASSED THROUGH ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION COVID-19 AMERICAN RESCUE PLAN - ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY SCHOOL EMERGENCY RELIEF FUND - AL NUMBER 84.425D AND 84.425U PASS-THROUGH NUMBER 5703 AUDIT PERIOD - YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2023 2023-002.Equipment and Real Property Management / Special Tests and Provisions Criteria or specific requirement: 29 CFR 5.5 (Wage Rate Requirements) requires all contractors and subcontractors performing construction contracts in excess of $2,000, financed by federal assistance funds, to pay laborers and mechanics employed by the contractor or subcontractor not less than the prevailing wage rates as determined by the Department of Labor for the locality of the project. Non-federal entities shall include in the applicable construction contracts a provision that the contractor or subcontractor comply with those requirements. Such requirements include the submission of weekly certified payrolls for each week in which any contract work is performed, to the non-federal entities. 2 CFR 200.311 requires property records be maintained for real property and improvements made to real property acquired with federal awards. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.326 and Ark. Code Ann. § 18-44-503 require a non-federal entity to obtain a performance bond for the public construction contract. Condition: The District paid $1,322,196 for a capital improvement flooring project from the Education Stabilization Fund without obtaining a performance bond and without obtaining a written contract that included the prevailing wage rate provision, and weekly certified payrolls were not submitted to the District. Additionally, the District did not record in the capital assets subsidiary records capital improvements for a HVAC system or flooring project totaling $154,377 and $1,322,196, respectively, and for equipment totaling $12,138. Cause: Lack of internal controls and management oversight. Effect or potential effect: The District did not comply with Wage Rate Requirements or Bonding Requirements. The District's capital assets subsidiary records were not accurate. Questioned costs:Context: A population of 20 payments for capital improvements and equipment totaling $1,525,445. All were examined. Identification as a repeat finding: No Recommendation: The District should contact the Arkansas Division of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE) for guidance regarding this matter and implement proper controls over program expenditures. Views of responsible officials: The Department of Elementary and Secondary Education will be contacted regarding this matter. The district did not receive guidance from the Department about this issue other than stating that Davis-Bacon wage rules apply. Those materials will be recorded as capital assets and our new capital assets clerk will be trained on the definition and record keeping of such items. This likely occurred simply from the fact that yearly past practice for the district has been to enter the asset as one item in the asset system. Construction in progress has been used as a reconciliation item in fixed assets. There must have been some misunderstanding on this matter because the district does have a statement of coverage for the company that did this work and will provide it. However, if the format is wrong, the district will, in the future, insist that the proper format be used.
Finding Number: 2023-003 Repeat Finding: Similar to prior year finding 2022-003 Program Name/Assistance Listing Title: Indian School Equalization, Special Education Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 15.042, 84.027 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Department of Education Federal Award Number: A22AV00792 Questioned Costs: None Type of Finding: Noncompliance, Material Weakness Compliance Requirement: Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Criteria: Under 2 CFR §215.43 the School is required to implement certain procurement policies that adhere to the minimum federal requirements as outlined in 2 CFR §215.44. Non-federal entities other than States, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of States, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR §§200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable State and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the Procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200. Condition: The School did not always follow procurement standards as put forth in 2 CFR §200.318 through §200.326. Effect: Noncompliance with federal regulation that led to a qualified audit opinion over the listed federal programs as noted above. Cause: Management oversight. Context: For ten of 25 vendors within the Simplified Acquisition Threshold reviewed, the School did not maintain documentation that appropriate procurement procedures were performed. Recommendation: The School should review its procurement procedures to ensure that proper procurement procedures are performed documentation is maintained to support the procurement. Response: The School’s responses are presented in a separate document. Contact person: Dolores Silva, Chief Financial Officer
Finding Number: 2023-003 Repeat Finding: Similar to prior year finding 2022-003 Program Name/Assistance Listing Title: Indian School Equalization, Special Education Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 15.042, 84.027 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Department of Education Federal Award Number: A22AV00792 Questioned Costs: None Type of Finding: Noncompliance, Material Weakness Compliance Requirement: Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Criteria: Under 2 CFR §215.43 the School is required to implement certain procurement policies that adhere to the minimum federal requirements as outlined in 2 CFR §215.44. Non-federal entities other than States, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of States, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR §§200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable State and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the Procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200. Condition: The School did not always follow procurement standards as put forth in 2 CFR §200.318 through §200.326. Effect: Noncompliance with federal regulation that led to a qualified audit opinion over the listed federal programs as noted above. Cause: Management oversight. Context: For ten of 25 vendors within the Simplified Acquisition Threshold reviewed, the School did not maintain documentation that appropriate procurement procedures were performed. Recommendation: The School should review its procurement procedures to ensure that proper procurement procedures are performed documentation is maintained to support the procurement. Response: The School’s responses are presented in a separate document. Contact person: Dolores Silva, Chief Financial Officer
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION PASSED THROUGH THE ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION COVID-19 - AMERICAN RESCUE PLAN - ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY SCHOOL EMERGENCY RELIEF FUND - AL NUMBER 84.425U PASS-THROUGH NUMBER 7009 AUDIT PERIOD - YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2023 2023-001.Equipment and Real Property Management and Special Tests and Provisions Criteria or specific requirement: Property records should be maintained for equipment acquired with federal awards as specified in 2 CFR Section 200.313. In addition, 29 CFR 5.5 (Wage Rate Requirements) requires all contractors and subcontractors performing construction contracts in excess of $2,000, financed by federal assistance funds, to pay laborers and mechanics employed by the contractor or subcontractor not less than the prevailing wage rates established by the Department of Labor for the locality of the project. Non-federal entities shall include in the applicable construction contracts a provision that the contractor or subcontractor comply with those requirements. Such requirements include the submission of weekly certified payrolls for each week in which any contract work is performed, to the non-federal entities. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.326 and Ark. Code Ann. § 18-44-503 require a non-federal entity to obtain a performance bond for the public construction contract. Condition: The District paid $54,427 for installation of a security camera system from the Education Stabilization Fund without obtaining a written contract that included the prevailing wage rate provision, and weekly certified payrolls were not submitted to the District. Additionally, the District did not obtain a performance bond from the contractor, as required by Ark. Code Ann. § 18-44-503, and the system was not recorded in the District's equipment subsidiary ledger. Cause: Lack of Internal controls and management oversight. Effect or potential effect: The District did not comply with Wage Rate Requirements or Bonding Requirements. Additionally, the District's equipment subsidiary records were not accurate. Context: Examined all payments/contracts for facility repairs and improvements, four in total. Identification as a repeat finding: Yes Recommendation: The District should contact the Arkansas Division of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE) for guidance regarding this matter and implement proper controls over program expenditures. Views of responsible officials: The District will conduct a training for all supervisors indicating and sharing what forms are required for each item purchased or purchased service prior to releasing any funds. Links to required Work Force forms(Davis Bacon Forms; Bond Contractor Form, etc. ) will be shared with all supervisors to use during collaboration with contractors and subcontractors. We are currently working with the company to determine how best to obtain these records from past services.
Improve Controls and Documentation over Procurement Federal Agency: U.S. Department of the Treasury Program: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund AL Numbers: 21.027 Award Year: 2023 Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Type of Finding Compliance Internal Control over Compliance - Significant Deficiency Criteria or Specific Requirement Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. As governmental entities are also required to use the same state procurement policies and procedures for federal funds as for non-federal funds, the Town is required to follow Massachusetts General Laws, Chapter (MGL) 30(b). MGL 30(b) requires the solicitation of three written or oral quotes for procurements of supplies between $10,000 and $49,999 and sealed bids or proposals for procurements of supplies $50,000 and over. Management of the Town is also responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over compliance with federal requirements that have a direct and material effect on a federal program. A deficiency in internal control over compliance exists when the design or operation of a control over compliance does not allow management or employees, in the normal course of performing their assigned functions, to prevent, or detect and correct, noncompliance with a type of compliance requirement of a federal program on a timely basis. Condition and Context There was no evidence to document support that disbursements properly followed the procurement process before payments for services were made to the vendor. Cause Weaknesses in the design and operation of controls. 2023-001 Improve Controls and Documentation over Procurement (Continued) Effect or Potential Effect Due to the weaknesses in internal controls noted above, there is a risk that procurements may be awarded to vendors in a manner that is not consistent with federal procurement requirements. Known questioned costs are reported below, calculated as all payments to the referenced vendor: AL Questioned Number(s) Name of Federal Program or Cluster Costs 21.027 COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local $237,888 Fiscal Recovery Funds Recommendation The Town should address the weaknesses in internal controls noted above in order to ensure that federal procurements are conducted in accordance with federal and state requirements. Views of Responsible Official Management agrees with the finding. Planned Corrective Action Management’s corrective action plan is included at the end of this report after the Schedule of Prior Year Findings.
Procurement Process COVID-19 – Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases (ELC), Assistance Listing #93.323; Passed through the Oklahoma State Department of Education (Fund 723) Compliance Requirement: Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance; Material Noncompliance Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303(a) establishes that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award the provides assurance that the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations and conditions of the federal award. Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. Effective May 14, 2022, the non-Federal entity must ensure that all applicable programs comply with section 70914 of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act, including through incorporation of a Buy America preference in the terms and conditions of each award with an infrastructure project. Condition: A vendor that was funded by the ELC program had not gone through the procurement process as required by applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. Cause: The District has previously funded the vendor using state and local funds rather than federal funds for the past several years. The vendor’s service was identified that the use of the funds was an allowable activity and cost, but the vendor had not gone through the required procurement process for federally funded programs. Effect: The District is out of compliance with federal requirements regarding procurement and could be contracting with vendors that are not the most practical for the District. Context/Sampling: Both of the two vendors that met this scope in this program was tested so no sampling was necessary. Repeat Finding From Prior Year: No Questioned costs: Funds spent with this vendor in this program were $486,260. Recommendation: Control procedures should be implemented to ensure that all vendors that are paid with federal funds following the required procurement regulations and ensure federal updates are regularly made to ensure continued compliance with procurement requirements. Views of Responsible Officials: The District understands the importance of complying with federal procurement requirements and will ensure all staff involved with federal funds are informed of the procurement rules with the addition of the federal compliance procedures to our Fiscal Management Policy.
2 CFR § 3474.1 provides the Department of Education (DOE) adopts the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Guidance in 2 CFR part 200. Thus, this section gives regulatory effect to the OMB guidance and supplements the guidance as needed for the DOE, except as otherwise noted in that section. 2 CFR Part 200, Appendix II(D) states all laborers and mechanics employed by contractors or subcontractors to work on construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by federal assistance funds must be paid wages not less than those established for the locality of the project (prevailing wage rates) by the Department of Labor (DOL) (40 USC 3141–3144, 3146, and 3147. Nonfederal entities shall include in their construction contracts subject to the Wage Rate Requirements (which still may be referenced as the Davis-Bacon Act) a provision that the contractor or subcontractor comply with those requirements and the DOL regulations (29 CFR Part 5, Labor Standards Provisions Applicable to Contacts Governing Federally Financed and Assisted Construction). This includes a requirement for the contractor or subcontractor to submit to the nonfederal entity weekly, for each week in which any contract work is performed, a copy of the payroll and a statement of compliance (certified payrolls) (29 CFR sections 5.5 and 5.6; the A-102 Common Rule (section 36(i)(5)); OMB Circular A-110 (2 CFR Part 215, Appendix A, Contract Provisions); 2 CFR Part 176, Subpart C; and 2 CFR section 200.326). The District entered into a contract for the removal of a playground surface which was paid from the ESSER fund. The contract had the Davis Bacon prevailing wage language, but certified payrolls were not provided. Lack of effective controls led to the District's failure to obtain weekly certified payroll reports from the contractor or subcontractors on a weekly basis. Failure to have effective controls in place over wage-rate requirements may result in the District and its contractors or subcontractors failing to pay prevailing wages when required by Federal law and could result in reduction of future Federal funding or other sanctions imposed by Federal grantors. When required by Federal grant legislation, the District should ensure prime construction contracts in excess of $2,000 paid with Federal grant monies contain provisions that require the contractor to comply with wage rate requirements. Further, the District should ensure certified payroll reports are provided weekly by the contractor.
2 CFR § 3474.1 provides the Department of Education (DOE) adopts the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Guidance in 2 CFR part 200. Thus, this section gives regulatory effect to the OMB guidance and supplements the guidance as needed for the DOE, except as otherwise noted in that section. 2 CFR Part 200, Appendix II(D) states all laborers and mechanics employed by contractors or subcontractors to work on construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by federal assistance funds must be paid wages not less than those established for the locality of the project (prevailing wage rates) by the Department of Labor (DOL) (40 USC 3141–3144, 3146, and 3147. Nonfederal entities shall include in their construction contracts subject to the Wage Rate Requirements (which still may be referenced as the Davis-Bacon Act) a provision that the contractor or subcontractor comply with those requirements and the DOL regulations (29 CFR Part 5, Labor Standards Provisions Applicable to Contacts Governing Federally Financed and Assisted Construction). This includes a requirement for the contractor or subcontractor to submit to the nonfederal entity weekly, for each week in which any contract work is performed, a copy of the payroll and a statement of compliance (certified payrolls) (29 CFR sections 5.5 and 5.6; the A-102 Common Rule (section 36(i)(5)); OMB Circular A-110 (2 CFR Part 215, Appendix A, Contract Provisions); 2 CFR Part 176, Subpart C; and 2 CFR section 200.326). The District entered into a contract for the removal of a playground surface which was paid from the ESSER fund. The contract had the Davis Bacon prevailing wage language, but certified payrolls were not provided. Lack of effective controls led to the District's failure to obtain weekly certified payroll reports from the contractor or subcontractors on a weekly basis. Failure to have effective controls in place over wage-rate requirements may result in the District and its contractors or subcontractors failing to pay prevailing wages when required by Federal law and could result in reduction of future Federal funding or other sanctions imposed by Federal grantors. When required by Federal grant legislation, the District should ensure prime construction contracts in excess of $2,000 paid with Federal grant monies contain provisions that require the contractor to comply with wage rate requirements. Further, the District should ensure certified payroll reports are provided weekly by the contractor.
2023 – 002 – Special Provisions Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Federal Program Name: Impact Aid Assistance Listing Number: 84.041 Pass-Through Agency: N/A Pass-Through Number(s): N/A Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Statistically Valid Sample: No, and not intended to be a Statistically Valid Sample. Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance and Noncompliance Criteria: Department of Labor (DOL) (40 USC 3141–3144, 3146, and 3147 All laborers and mechanics employed by contractors or subcontractors to work on construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by federal assistance funds must be paid wages not less than those established for the locality of the project (prevailing wage rates) by the Department of Labor. Nonfederal entities shall include in their construction contracts subject to the Wage Rate Requirements (which still may be referenced as the Davis-Bacon Act) a provision that the contractor or subcontractor comply with those requirements and the DOL regulations (29 CFR Part 5, Labor Standards Provisions Applicable to Contacts Governing Federally Financed and Assisted Construction). This includes a requirement for the contractor or subcontractor to submit to the nonfederal entity weekly, for each week in which any contract work is performed, a copy of the payroll and a statement of compliance (certified payrolls) (29 CFR sections 5.5 and 5.6; the A-102 Common Rule (section 36(i)(5)); OMB Circular A-110 (2 CFR Part 215, Appendix A, Contract Provisions); 2 CFR Part 176, Subpart C; and 2 CFR section 200.326). This reporting is often done using Optional Form WH-347, which includes the required statement of compliance (OMB No. 1235-0008). Condition/Context: For two out of three contracts sampled there was no prevailing wage clause noted to be followed in the contract agreements. Also, for the same two contracts sampled weekly certified payrolls were not collected and maintained for any relevant weeks during the fiscal year. Also, we did not note the superintendent’s signature on the contracts. Questioned costs: None Cause: Current process and controls are not at the correct precision level to ensure review of wage rate requirements are properly documented/processed to ensure compliances are being met. Effect: Ineffective internal controls may result in questioned costs and noncompliance with the terms of the grant award. Repeat finding: No Recommendation: The District should refine its current process and associated controls surrounding the requirements in 29 CFR Part 5, Labor Standards Provisions Applicable to Contacts Governing Federally Financed and Assisted Construction. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. See corrective action plan
Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Federal Program Name: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various Pass-Through Agency: State of Connecticut Department of Children & Families, State of Connecticut Judicial Branch, City of Norwalk, City of New Haven Pass-Through Numbers: Various Award Period: Various Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Material Noncompliance (Modified Opinion) Criteria or Specific Requirement: The Organization must comply with procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 within Uniform Guidance. Condition: The procurement policy and conflict of interest policy of the Organization do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned Costs: No costs have been questioned. Context: Although the Organization did not have a policy in place that is fully in conformity with the Federal Uniform Guidance criteria, the Organization did follow the Federal procedures as it relates to the contracts under the procurements applicable to the Organization's major program. Cause: Management was unaware of the restrictive requirements of the procurement standards. Effect: With the absence of a compliant policy, the Organization is at risk for noncompliance as it relates to federal procurement. Repeat Finding: Finding does not represent a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization review its procurement policy and conflict of interest policy and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 and 200.326. Views of Responsible Officials: Management concurs with the finding. Refer to the separate corrective action plan.
Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Federal Program Name: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various Pass-Through Agency: State of Connecticut Department of Children & Families, State of Connecticut Judicial Branch, City of Norwalk, City of New Haven Pass-Through Numbers: Various Award Period: Various Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Material Noncompliance (Modified Opinion) Criteria or Specific Requirement: The Organization must comply with procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 within Uniform Guidance. Condition: The procurement policy and conflict of interest policy of the Organization do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned Costs: No costs have been questioned. Context: Although the Organization did not have a policy in place that is fully in conformity with the Federal Uniform Guidance criteria, the Organization did follow the Federal procedures as it relates to the contracts under the procurements applicable to the Organization's major program. Cause: Management was unaware of the restrictive requirements of the procurement standards. Effect: With the absence of a compliant policy, the Organization is at risk for noncompliance as it relates to federal procurement. Repeat Finding: Finding does not represent a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization review its procurement policy and conflict of interest policy and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 and 200.326. Views of Responsible Officials: Management concurs with the finding. Refer to the separate corrective action plan.
Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Federal Program Name: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various Pass-Through Agency: State of Connecticut Department of Children & Families, State of Connecticut Judicial Branch, City of Norwalk, City of New Haven Pass-Through Numbers: Various Award Period: Various Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Material Noncompliance (Modified Opinion) Criteria or Specific Requirement: The Organization must comply with procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 within Uniform Guidance. Condition: The procurement policy and conflict of interest policy of the Organization do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned Costs: No costs have been questioned. Context: Although the Organization did not have a policy in place that is fully in conformity with the Federal Uniform Guidance criteria, the Organization did follow the Federal procedures as it relates to the contracts under the procurements applicable to the Organization's major program. Cause: Management was unaware of the restrictive requirements of the procurement standards. Effect: With the absence of a compliant policy, the Organization is at risk for noncompliance as it relates to federal procurement. Repeat Finding: Finding does not represent a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization review its procurement policy and conflict of interest policy and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 and 200.326. Views of Responsible Officials: Management concurs with the finding. Refer to the separate corrective action plan.
Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Federal Program Name: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various Pass-Through Agency: State of Connecticut Department of Children & Families, State of Connecticut Judicial Branch, City of Norwalk, City of New Haven Pass-Through Numbers: Various Award Period: Various Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Material Noncompliance (Modified Opinion) Criteria or Specific Requirement: The Organization must comply with procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 within Uniform Guidance. Condition: The procurement policy and conflict of interest policy of the Organization do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned Costs: No costs have been questioned. Context: Although the Organization did not have a policy in place that is fully in conformity with the Federal Uniform Guidance criteria, the Organization did follow the Federal procedures as it relates to the contracts under the procurements applicable to the Organization's major program. Cause: Management was unaware of the restrictive requirements of the procurement standards. Effect: With the absence of a compliant policy, the Organization is at risk for noncompliance as it relates to federal procurement. Repeat Finding: Finding does not represent a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization review its procurement policy and conflict of interest policy and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 and 200.326. Views of Responsible Officials: Management concurs with the finding. Refer to the separate corrective action plan.
Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Federal Program Name: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various Pass-Through Agency: State of Connecticut Department of Children & Families, State of Connecticut Judicial Branch, City of Norwalk, City of New Haven Pass-Through Numbers: Various Award Period: Various Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Material Noncompliance (Modified Opinion) Criteria or Specific Requirement: The Organization must comply with procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 within Uniform Guidance. Condition: The procurement policy and conflict of interest policy of the Organization do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned Costs: No costs have been questioned. Context: Although the Organization did not have a policy in place that is fully in conformity with the Federal Uniform Guidance criteria, the Organization did follow the Federal procedures as it relates to the contracts under the procurements applicable to the Organization's major program. Cause: Management was unaware of the restrictive requirements of the procurement standards. Effect: With the absence of a compliant policy, the Organization is at risk for noncompliance as it relates to federal procurement. Repeat Finding: Finding does not represent a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization review its procurement policy and conflict of interest policy and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 and 200.326. Views of Responsible Officials: Management concurs with the finding. Refer to the separate corrective action plan.
Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Federal Program Name: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various Pass-Through Agency: State of Connecticut Department of Children & Families, State of Connecticut Judicial Branch, City of Norwalk, City of New Haven Pass-Through Numbers: Various Award Period: Various Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Material Noncompliance (Modified Opinion) Criteria or Specific Requirement: The Organization must comply with procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 within Uniform Guidance. Condition: The procurement policy and conflict of interest policy of the Organization do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned Costs: No costs have been questioned. Context: Although the Organization did not have a policy in place that is fully in conformity with the Federal Uniform Guidance criteria, the Organization did follow the Federal procedures as it relates to the contracts under the procurements applicable to the Organization's major program. Cause: Management was unaware of the restrictive requirements of the procurement standards. Effect: With the absence of a compliant policy, the Organization is at risk for noncompliance as it relates to federal procurement. Repeat Finding: Finding does not represent a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization review its procurement policy and conflict of interest policy and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 and 200.326. Views of Responsible Officials: Management concurs with the finding. Refer to the separate corrective action plan.
2023-003 Uniform Guidance Written Policies and Procedures Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria Uniform Guidance 2 CFR Part 180 requires written policies and procedures related to Internal controls be written regarding SAMS. gov contractor verification of debarment and suspension. In addition, 2 CFR Part 200.326 Contract Provisions that pay over $2,000 in labor wages are required to be in compliant with Davis Bacon Labor Laws. This requirement contains written achnowledgement of certified wage rate payrolls weekly and contractual language of the wage rate certification of payroll in the contract between the contractor and the Joint Powers Board. Cause Tongue River Valley Joint Powers Board do not have written updated policies implementing Uniform Guidance contractual and internal control procedures. They operate under the WY Statues - which covers entities within Wyoming jurisdiction, however the Joint Powers Board also has Federal requirements due to the Federal USDA loan. Condition Without lack of written policies, the Joint Powers Board could enter transactions with debarred or suspended vendors, and not pay adequate Federal wages to labors. Effect The Joint Powers Board must use funds efficiently and effectively and in accordance with Federal OMB Uniform Guidance to prevent mismanagement of projects funded by Federal awards. Questioned Costs Less than $25,000 Recommendation We recommend that the Joint Power Board update their written internal control policies to contain all Uniform Guidance regulations, relating to Sams. gov debarment and suspension and Davis Bacon Wage Requirements. It is recommended that these be policies and internal controls be reviewed and aligned with the Federal Award contractual agreeements on a routine basis. View of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions Please see the last page of this report for the written response from the Board.
Program: Education Stabilization Fund COVID-19 American Rescue Plan - Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (84.425U) Criteria: All laborers and mechanics employed by contractors or subcontractors to work on construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by federal assistance funds must be paid wages not less than those established for the locality of the project (prevailing wage rates) by the Department of Labor (DOL) (40 USC 3141-3144, 3146, and 3147). Nonfederal entities shall include in their construction contracts subject to the Wage Rate Requirements a provision that the contractor or subcontractor comply with those requirements and the DOL regulations (29 CFR Part 5, Labor Standards Provisions Applicable to Contracts Governing Federally Financed and Assisted Construction). This includes a requirement for the contractor of subcontractor to submit to the nonfederal entity weekly, for each week in which any contract work is performed, a copy of the payroll and a statement of compliance (certified payrolls) (29 CFR sections 5.5 and 5.6; the A-102 Common Rule (section 36(i)(5)); OMB Circular A-110 (2 CFR Part 215 Appendix A, Contract Provisions; 2 CFR Part 176 Subpart C; and 2 CFR section 200.326). Context and Condition: We reviewed the District’s construction contract that was financed by the Education Stabilization Fund during the year ended June 30, 2023 and performed testing over internal controls and compliance as related to the Wage Rate Requirements as outlined in the criteria above. Cause: The District did not have processes or controls established to ensure certified payrolls for each week in which contract work was performed were obtained from the contractor or subcontractor for construction contracts financed by the Education Stabilization Fund until after the construction contract was completed. Effect: A potential failure to pay laborers and mechanics employed by contractors or subcontractors prevailing wage rates as required by the Wage Rate Requirements exists. Questioned Costs: No costs were questionable. Repeat Finding: No Statistically valid: Yes Recommendation: We recommend management of the District review processes related to construction projects subject to the Wage Rate Requirements and establish appropriate internal controls to ensure all wage rate requirements are met. Views of responsible officials: Management of the District has reviewed the processes and internal controls related to construction contracts and have implemented changes to ensure that the Wage Rate Requirements are adhered to when applicable.
Material noncompliance and material weakness in internal control over compliance with procurement and suspension and debarment procedures meeting the requirements of 2 CFR Part 200. Federal Agency: United States Department Treasury Program Titles: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Pass-Through Entity: King County Regional Homeless Authority Award Numbers: DA-202303-01737 Award Periods: March 15, 2023 through August 31, 2023 Criteria Internal controls requirements contained in Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance) , Subpart D ‐ Post Federal Award Requirements, Section 200.318 through 200.326 Internal Controls, require that a non‐Federal entity use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirement identified in 2 CFR Part 200. Condition/Context The Organization has a procurement policy, which includes procedures to include documenting the history of the procurement, including justification of the procurement method utilized. For 3 of 3 procurements selected for testing over the micro-purchase threshold the Organization could not produce contemporaneous documentation supporting the history of the procurement including justification for utilization of the noncompetitive procurement method of procurement and performance of suspension and debarment search. The Organization determined at the time of procurement that due to a state of public emergency the noncompetitive procurement methodology was in compliance with the Uniform Guidance. Further, subsequent to audit testing the Organization received approval from the pass-through funder that a noncompetitive procurement methodology was authorized. Cause The Organization did not have internal controls in place to ensure that the Organization’s procurement policy was followed by retaining documentation of management consideration and conclusion when procuring goods and services. Effect The Organization entered into agreements to procure goods and services for which no documentation was retained to support the history of the procurement. Questioned Costs $0 Repeat Finding Not a repeat finding. Recommendation We recommend the Organization implement internal controls to ensure that documentation is retained to support procurements in accordance with its procurement policy. Views of Responsible Individual and Corrective Action Plan Management agrees with the finding and has provided the accompanying corrective action plan.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Federal Program Name: State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: SLFRP2619, 2023 Pass-Through Agency: Minnesota Department of Education Pass-Through Numbers: Unknown Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance and Compliance Finding (Modified Opinion) Criteria or Specific Requirement: Non-federal entities other than states must follow the procurement standards set out at c CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. This includes utilizing one of the five allowable procurement methods, including small purchase guidelines for items over the micro-purchase threshold and sealed bids, competitive proposals, or noncompetitive proposals when items exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. In addition, the Uniform Guidance requires that the entity maintain records sufficient to detail the history of the procurement. Condition: During our testing of the District’s procurements within the State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds program, it was noted that not all procurements followed the appropriate method and history of the transaction was not sufficiently documented. Context: All 5 of the procurements which were tested, we noted that the District did not retain documentation detailing the procurement process or what quotes were obtained. Questioned Costs: None Cause: Time pressure led to this requirement not being met. Effect: The District was not in compliance with the documentation requirements for procurement transactions as detailed in the Uniform Guidance. Repeat Finding: This is a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend the District review its procedures and controls over procurement to ensure that all procurements are documented such that a third party can clearly see and understand the detailed history of the procurement. Views of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Federal Program Name: State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: SLFRP2619, 2023 Pass-Through Agency: Minnesota Department of Education Pass-Through Numbers: Unknown Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance and Compliance Finding (Modified Opinion) Criteria or Specific Requirement: Non-federal entities other than states must follow the procurement standards set out at c CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. This includes utilizing one of the five allowable procurement methods, including small purchase guidelines for items over the micro-purchase threshold and sealed bids, competitive proposals, or noncompetitive proposals when items exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. In addition, the Uniform Guidance requires that the entity maintain records sufficient to detail the history of the procurement. Condition: During our testing of the District’s procurements within the State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds program, it was noted that not all procurements followed the appropriate method and history of the transaction was not sufficiently documented. Context: All 5 of the procurements which were tested, we noted that the District did not retain documentation detailing the procurement process or what quotes were obtained. Questioned Costs: None Cause: Time pressure led to this requirement not being met. Effect: The District was not in compliance with the documentation requirements for procurement transactions as detailed in the Uniform Guidance. Repeat Finding: This is a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend the District review its procedures and controls over procurement to ensure that all procurements are documented such that a third party can clearly see and understand the detailed history of the procurement. Views of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Federal Program Name: State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: SLFRP2619, 2023 Pass-Through Agency: Minnesota Department of Education Pass-Through Numbers: Unknown Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance and Compliance Finding (Modified Opinion) Criteria or Specific Requirement: Non-federal entities other than states must follow the procurement standards set out at c CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. This includes utilizing one of the five allowable procurement methods, including small purchase guidelines for items over the micro-purchase threshold and sealed bids, competitive proposals, or noncompetitive proposals when items exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. In addition, the Uniform Guidance requires that the entity maintain records sufficient to detail the history of the procurement. Condition: During our testing of the District’s procurements within the State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds program, it was noted that not all procurements followed the appropriate method and history of the transaction was not sufficiently documented. Context: All 5 of the procurements which were tested, we noted that the District did not retain documentation detailing the procurement process or what quotes were obtained. Questioned Costs: None Cause: Time pressure led to this requirement not being met. Effect: The District was not in compliance with the documentation requirements for procurement transactions as detailed in the Uniform Guidance. Repeat Finding: This is a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend the District review its procedures and controls over procurement to ensure that all procurements are documented such that a third party can clearly see and understand the detailed history of the procurement. Views of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Federal Program Name: State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: SLFRP2619, 2023 Pass-Through Agency: Minnesota Department of Education Pass-Through Numbers: Unknown Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance and Compliance Finding (Modified Opinion) Criteria or Specific Requirement: Non-federal entities other than states must follow the procurement standards set out at c CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. This includes utilizing one of the five allowable procurement methods, including small purchase guidelines for items over the micro-purchase threshold and sealed bids, competitive proposals, or noncompetitive proposals when items exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. In addition, the Uniform Guidance requires that the entity maintain records sufficient to detail the history of the procurement. Condition: During our testing of the District’s procurements within the State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds program, it was noted that not all procurements followed the appropriate method and history of the transaction was not sufficiently documented. Context: All 5 of the procurements which were tested, we noted that the District did not retain documentation detailing the procurement process or what quotes were obtained. Questioned Costs: None Cause: Time pressure led to this requirement not being met. Effect: The District was not in compliance with the documentation requirements for procurement transactions as detailed in the Uniform Guidance. Repeat Finding: This is a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend the District review its procedures and controls over procurement to ensure that all procurements are documented such that a third party can clearly see and understand the detailed history of the procurement. Views of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Federal Program Name: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) Assistance Listing Number: 84.027 and 84.173 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: H027A220087, 2023 Pass-Through Agency: Minnesota Department of Education Pass-Through Numbers: H027A210087, H027X210087, H173A210086, H173X210086 Award Period: July 1, 2022 – September 30, 2023 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance and Compliance Finding (Modified Opinion) Criteria or Specific Requirement: Non-federal entities other than states must follow the procurement standards set out at c CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. This includes utilizing one of the five allowable procurement methods, including small purchase guidelines for items over the micro-purchase threshold and sealed bids, competitive proposals, or noncompetitive proposals when items exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. In addition, the Uniform Guidance requires that the entity maintain records sufficient to detail the history of the procurement. Condition: During our testing of the District’s procurements within the Special Education program, it was noted that not all procurements followed the appropriate method and history of the transaction was not sufficiently documented. Context: For 2 out of the 3 procurements that were tested, we noted that the District did not retain documentation detailing the procurement process or what quotes were obtained. Questioned Costs: None Cause: Time pressure led to this requirement not being met. Effect: The District was not in compliance with the documentation requirements for procurement transactions as detailed in the Uniform Guidance. Repeat Finding: This a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend the District reviews its procedures and controls over procurement to ensure that all procurements are documented such that a third party can clearly see and understand the detailed history of the procurement. Views of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Federal Program Name: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) Assistance Listing Number: 84.027 and 84.173 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: H027A220087, 2023 Pass-Through Agency: Minnesota Department of Education Pass-Through Numbers: H027A210087, H027X210087, H173A210086, H173X210086 Award Period: July 1, 2022 – September 30, 2023 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance and Compliance Finding (Modified Opinion) Criteria or Specific Requirement: Non-federal entities other than states must follow the procurement standards set out at c CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. This includes utilizing one of the five allowable procurement methods, including small purchase guidelines for items over the micro-purchase threshold and sealed bids, competitive proposals, or noncompetitive proposals when items exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. In addition, the Uniform Guidance requires that the entity maintain records sufficient to detail the history of the procurement. Condition: During our testing of the District’s procurements within the Special Education program, it was noted that not all procurements followed the appropriate method and history of the transaction was not sufficiently documented. Context: For 2 out of the 3 procurements that were tested, we noted that the District did not retain documentation detailing the procurement process or what quotes were obtained. Questioned Costs: None Cause: Time pressure led to this requirement not being met. Effect: The District was not in compliance with the documentation requirements for procurement transactions as detailed in the Uniform Guidance. Repeat Finding: This a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend the District reviews its procedures and controls over procurement to ensure that all procurements are documented such that a third party can clearly see and understand the detailed history of the procurement. Views of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Federal Program Name: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) Assistance Listing Number: 84.027 and 84.173 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: H027A220087, 2023 Pass-Through Agency: Minnesota Department of Education Pass-Through Numbers: H027A210087, H027X210087, H173A210086, H173X210086 Award Period: July 1, 2022 – September 30, 2023 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance and Compliance Finding (Modified Opinion) Criteria or Specific Requirement: Non-federal entities other than states must follow the procurement standards set out at c CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. This includes utilizing one of the five allowable procurement methods, including small purchase guidelines for items over the micro-purchase threshold and sealed bids, competitive proposals, or noncompetitive proposals when items exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. In addition, the Uniform Guidance requires that the entity maintain records sufficient to detail the history of the procurement. Condition: During our testing of the District’s procurements within the Special Education program, it was noted that not all procurements followed the appropriate method and history of the transaction was not sufficiently documented. Context: For 2 out of the 3 procurements that were tested, we noted that the District did not retain documentation detailing the procurement process or what quotes were obtained. Questioned Costs: None Cause: Time pressure led to this requirement not being met. Effect: The District was not in compliance with the documentation requirements for procurement transactions as detailed in the Uniform Guidance. Repeat Finding: This a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend the District reviews its procedures and controls over procurement to ensure that all procurements are documented such that a third party can clearly see and understand the detailed history of the procurement. Views of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Federal Program Name: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) Assistance Listing Number: 84.027 and 84.173 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: H027A220087, 2023 Pass-Through Agency: Minnesota Department of Education Pass-Through Numbers: H027A210087, H027X210087, H173A210086, H173X210086 Award Period: July 1, 2022 – September 30, 2023 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance and Compliance Finding (Modified Opinion) Criteria or Specific Requirement: Non-federal entities other than states must follow the procurement standards set out at c CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. This includes utilizing one of the five allowable procurement methods, including small purchase guidelines for items over the micro-purchase threshold and sealed bids, competitive proposals, or noncompetitive proposals when items exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. In addition, the Uniform Guidance requires that the entity maintain records sufficient to detail the history of the procurement. Condition: During our testing of the District’s procurements within the Special Education program, it was noted that not all procurements followed the appropriate method and history of the transaction was not sufficiently documented. Context: For 2 out of the 3 procurements that were tested, we noted that the District did not retain documentation detailing the procurement process or what quotes were obtained. Questioned Costs: None Cause: Time pressure led to this requirement not being met. Effect: The District was not in compliance with the documentation requirements for procurement transactions as detailed in the Uniform Guidance. Repeat Finding: This a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend the District reviews its procedures and controls over procurement to ensure that all procurements are documented such that a third party can clearly see and understand the detailed history of the procurement. Views of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2023-004 - Procurement, Suspension & Debarment Federal Program Information: ALN - 10.760 - Water and Waste Disposal Systems for Rural Communities Criteria: The following CFR(s) apply to this finding: 2 CFR 200.317-200.326. Condition: During audit procedures, it was identified that the Town did not have a procurement policy in place. Cause: The Town needs to adopt a procurement policy to comply with Uniform Guidance. Effect: Procurements might not conform to applicable Federal laws. Identification of Questioned Costs: None identified. Context: The entire population. Repeat Finding: This is a repeat finding of 2022-004. Recommendation: It is recommended that the Town adopt a procurement policy that follows the Uniform Guidance and that the Town implement internal control processes and procedures to ensure that the adopted policy is followed. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan: Client agrees with finding and a version of their response can be found in the Corrective Action Plan. Please see the Corrective Action Plan issued by the Town of Livermore Falls.
2023-007- Procurement, Suspension & Debarment Federal Program Information: ALN - 66.458 - Clean Water State Revolving Funds Criteria: The following CFR(s) apply to this finding: 2 CFR 200.317 - 200.326. Condition: During audit procedures, it was identified that the Town did not have a procurement policy in place. Cause: The Town needs to adopt a procurement policy to comply with Uniform Guidance. Effect: Procurements might not conform to applicable Federal laws. Identification of Questioned Costs: None identified. Context: The entire population Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding Recommendation: It is recommended that the Town adopt a procurement policy that follows the Uniform Guidance and that the Town implements internal control processes and procedures to ensure that the adopted policy is followed. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan: Client agrees with finding and a version of their response can be found in the Corrective Action Plan. Please see the Corrective Action Plan issued by the Town of Livermore Falls.
2023-007- Procurement, Suspension & Debarment Federal Program Information: ALN - 66.458 - Clean Water State Revolving Funds Criteria: The following CFR(s) apply to this finding: 2 CFR 200.317 - 200.326. Condition: During audit procedures, it was identified that the Town did not have a procurement policy in place. Cause: The Town needs to adopt a procurement policy to comply with Uniform Guidance. Effect: Procurements might not conform to applicable Federal laws. Identification of Questioned Costs: None identified. Context: The entire population Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding Recommendation: It is recommended that the Town adopt a procurement policy that follows the Uniform Guidance and that the Town implements internal control processes and procedures to ensure that the adopted policy is followed. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan: Client agrees with finding and a version of their response can be found in the Corrective Action Plan. Please see the Corrective Action Plan issued by the Town of Livermore Falls.
2023-007- Procurement, Suspension & Debarment Federal Program Information: ALN - 66.458 - Clean Water State Revolving Funds Criteria: The following CFR(s) apply to this finding: 2 CFR 200.317 - 200.326. Condition: During audit procedures, it was identified that the Town did not have a procurement policy in place. Cause: The Town needs to adopt a procurement policy to comply with Uniform Guidance. Effect: Procurements might not conform to applicable Federal laws. Identification of Questioned Costs: None identified. Context: The entire population Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding Recommendation: It is recommended that the Town adopt a procurement policy that follows the Uniform Guidance and that the Town implements internal control processes and procedures to ensure that the adopted policy is followed. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan: Client agrees with finding and a version of their response can be found in the Corrective Action Plan. Please see the Corrective Action Plan issued by the Town of Livermore Falls.
2023-007- Procurement, Suspension & Debarment Federal Program Information: ALN - 66.458 - Clean Water State Revolving Funds Criteria: The following CFR(s) apply to this finding: 2 CFR 200.317 - 200.326. Condition: During audit procedures, it was identified that the Town did not have a procurement policy in place. Cause: The Town needs to adopt a procurement policy to comply with Uniform Guidance. Effect: Procurements might not conform to applicable Federal laws. Identification of Questioned Costs: None identified. Context: The entire population Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding Recommendation: It is recommended that the Town adopt a procurement policy that follows the Uniform Guidance and that the Town implements internal control processes and procedures to ensure that the adopted policy is followed. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan: Client agrees with finding and a version of their response can be found in the Corrective Action Plan. Please see the Corrective Action Plan issued by the Town of Livermore Falls.
Significant Deficiency – Item 2023-002 – Insufficient Required Substantiating Documentation for Major Programs Condition: Several expenditures and reports were selected for substantive, controls, and compliance testing from the financial records for the major programs. In several cases, the source documents supporting the federal expenditures reported were not accurate, missing and/or properly described. For expenditures allocated between award programs benefitted there was no written allocation methodology used including how costs were calculated and charged to each program. Federal regulations required that all federal expenditures must be supported by adequate source documents and accounting and cost records. Documentation must stipulate the nature of the expenditure (exactly what the funds were spent on), the purpose of the cost, the applicable federal program name, the cost for each product and service that agrees with the financial records and report to the federal funding source. In addition, PCCD provides to all related providers their “Financial and Administrative Guide for Grants” that clearly stipulates the nature of all substantiating documentation and reporting for all federal expenditures. Several expenditures tested included evidence of accounting system-generated approvals. In several cases, the person purchasing products and services also approved the expenditure. Along with that approval, there was another approval by the CFO, but the sign off showed that name as “Inactive”. For one of the PCCD contracts with subrecipients, periodically the Organization provides advances. However there is no accounting for use of the advances, and unused balances at period end are not reported on the financial statements. There are very explicit federal guidelines for time and effort accounting and reporting. Testing revealed discrepancies between individual’s time records, the payroll and check registers, posting to the general ledger, and the periodic reports to funders. In certain cases, the HR Supervisor approved hours included in timesheets that were not accurate. The time sheet hours exceeded the amount subsequently paid to the individual. Reconciliation of differences was a difficult process and the end result was a remaining difference not explained. Some timesheets for the program manager showed every posting was labelled with the wrong federal program name. Criteria: All expenditures charged to federal programs must be clearly and completely supported by required documentation that agrees with amounts in the Organization’s general ledger and periodic reports to the federal grantor. Cause: The Organization does not maintain written policies and procedures for procurement and reporting related to all financial transactions under federally-funded programs, including allowable costs and other federal compliance requirements. Procurement policies must adhere to the “Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles and Audit Requirements” for federal awards in 2CFR200.318 through 200.326. There is no formal Accounting Manual that is periodically revised when new grants are awarded or when the personnel pool changes. The written document must include a code of conduct for the Organization. When a new federal award is granted to the Organization with specific financial and administrative requirements, the manual should be revised to incorporate those requirements. The Organization has also experienced turnover of key personnel in the Finance Department. Effect: Several expenditures selected for testing were not properly documented in accordance with federal regulations. In several cases, the only supporting documentation was adjusting journal entries posted to the general ledger. In one case, an amount of $5,200 was posted to the general ledger under “Other Supportive Services”, but the Organization could not provide a copy of the adjusting entry nor any related documentation or explanation. In July 2022, costs totaling $5,500 were recorded that were related to expenses incurred in June 2022. The result of these deficiencies may be misstatement of costs that are periodically reported for reimbursement by the funder. Questioned Costs: The total estimated questioned costs for both major programs was $19,451. Certain tested expenditures included significant purchases of gas and gift cards and rail passes. For example, various amounts spent on individual purchases included $11,587, $16,773, and $47,801. These amounts are in addition to the questioned costs above. There were invoices for cards and passes that indicated they were sent to the Program Manager’s home address under his name and a related business name. There are no written control procedures for these purchases and no inventory is maintained of the supply on hand at any given time. Also, there no records supporting how the cards were distributed. On the related invoices for these purchases, there is insufficient documentation including no program names or purpose. Recommendation: All employees in the Finance Department and associated with any federal program must be adequately trained in overall federal regulations and guidance as well as other requirements associated with each federal award. All such employees must read the grant-related policies and procedures manual (to be developed) and accounting manual with the code of conduct. In addition, each month, finance should compare grant expenditures posted to the general ledger to the monthly grant reports and budgets. Management’s Response: Impact has experienced staff turnover which resulted in process challenges. Nevertheless, Impact will take this recommendation and implement revised procedures to ensure that the Finance Department and other pertinent Impact resources receive federal regulations and guidance training, incorporate available systems and technology capabilities available from the technology service providers, and adopt best practices. Finance will schedule regular grant reviews, inclusive of program expenditures. These improvements will be in place by March 31, 2025.