2022-002—Unallowable Gift Card Disbursements Charged to Federal Program Type of Finding: (F) Instance of Noncompliance Related to Federal Awards Funding Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services AL #: 93.231 – COVID-19: Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity Award #: Various Award Period: 09/30/2021 – 09/29/2026 Estimated Questioned Costs: $15,300 Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Statement of Condition AAIHB distributed gift cards to both salaried employees and independent contractors as a gesture of appreciation for working extended hours related to COVID-19 contact tracing efforts. The total value of the gift cards was approximately $15,300 and was charged to the COVID-19: Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity grant (AL #93.231). For contractors, these gift cards were provided in addition to their regular compensation. The gift card disbursements were not processed through payroll nor formalized in contract terms, and there is no documentation indicating the entity obtained approval from the awarding agency. Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR § 200.403, costs charged to federal awards must be necessary, reasonable, allocable, and conform to limitations set forth in federal regulations. Per 2 CFR § 200.421(e)(3), the cost of gifts—including cash or cash equivalents such as gift cards—is generally unallowable. Compensation for employees must comply with 2 CFR § 200.430, including support through written policies and documentation of time and effort. Contractor payments must align with procurement standards in 2 CFR § 200.318–200.324 and be governed by written contracts. Effect The use of federal funds to provide gift cards constitutes an unallowable cost under Uniform Guidance. The questioned amount may be subject to repayment to the awarding agency or passthrough entity. Cause The auditee sought to recognize the extraordinary efforts of personnel during the COVID-19 public health response. However, they were unaware that the use of gift cards for this purpose was inconsistent with Uniform Guidance and lacked prior approval or supporting policy. Recommendation We recommend the auditee discontinue the use of federal funds for gift card distributions. All compensation for employees should be processed through payroll, supported by appropriate documentation and internal policies. Payments to contractors should be governed by written contracts and comply with applicable procurement standards. If the auditee believes these costs are justifiable, they should consult the awarding agency for a determination and, if necessary, reimburse the federal award.
2022-002—Unallowable Gift Card Disbursements Charged to Federal Program Type of Finding: (F) Instance of Noncompliance Related to Federal Awards Funding Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services AL #: 93.231 – COVID-19: Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity Award #: Various Award Period: 09/30/2021 – 09/29/2026 Estimated Questioned Costs: $15,300 Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Statement of Condition AAIHB distributed gift cards to both salaried employees and independent contractors as a gesture of appreciation for working extended hours related to COVID-19 contact tracing efforts. The total value of the gift cards was approximately $15,300 and was charged to the COVID-19: Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity grant (AL #93.231). For contractors, these gift cards were provided in addition to their regular compensation. The gift card disbursements were not processed through payroll nor formalized in contract terms, and there is no documentation indicating the entity obtained approval from the awarding agency. Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR § 200.403, costs charged to federal awards must be necessary, reasonable, allocable, and conform to limitations set forth in federal regulations. Per 2 CFR § 200.421(e)(3), the cost of gifts—including cash or cash equivalents such as gift cards—is generally unallowable. Compensation for employees must comply with 2 CFR § 200.430, including support through written policies and documentation of time and effort. Contractor payments must align with procurement standards in 2 CFR § 200.318–200.324 and be governed by written contracts. Effect The use of federal funds to provide gift cards constitutes an unallowable cost under Uniform Guidance. The questioned amount may be subject to repayment to the awarding agency or passthrough entity. Cause The auditee sought to recognize the extraordinary efforts of personnel during the COVID-19 public health response. However, they were unaware that the use of gift cards for this purpose was inconsistent with Uniform Guidance and lacked prior approval or supporting policy. Recommendation We recommend the auditee discontinue the use of federal funds for gift card distributions. All compensation for employees should be processed through payroll, supported by appropriate documentation and internal policies. Payments to contractors should be governed by written contracts and comply with applicable procurement standards. If the auditee believes these costs are justifiable, they should consult the awarding agency for a determination and, if necessary, reimburse the federal award.
2022-002—Unallowable Gift Card Disbursements Charged to Federal Program Type of Finding: (F) Instance of Noncompliance Related to Federal Awards Funding Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services AL #: 93.231 – COVID-19: Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity Award #: Various Award Period: 09/30/2021 – 09/29/2026 Estimated Questioned Costs: $15,300 Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Statement of Condition AAIHB distributed gift cards to both salaried employees and independent contractors as a gesture of appreciation for working extended hours related to COVID-19 contact tracing efforts. The total value of the gift cards was approximately $15,300 and was charged to the COVID-19: Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity grant (AL #93.231). For contractors, these gift cards were provided in addition to their regular compensation. The gift card disbursements were not processed through payroll nor formalized in contract terms, and there is no documentation indicating the entity obtained approval from the awarding agency. Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR § 200.403, costs charged to federal awards must be necessary, reasonable, allocable, and conform to limitations set forth in federal regulations. Per 2 CFR § 200.421(e)(3), the cost of gifts—including cash or cash equivalents such as gift cards—is generally unallowable. Compensation for employees must comply with 2 CFR § 200.430, including support through written policies and documentation of time and effort. Contractor payments must align with procurement standards in 2 CFR § 200.318–200.324 and be governed by written contracts. Effect The use of federal funds to provide gift cards constitutes an unallowable cost under Uniform Guidance. The questioned amount may be subject to repayment to the awarding agency or passthrough entity. Cause The auditee sought to recognize the extraordinary efforts of personnel during the COVID-19 public health response. However, they were unaware that the use of gift cards for this purpose was inconsistent with Uniform Guidance and lacked prior approval or supporting policy. Recommendation We recommend the auditee discontinue the use of federal funds for gift card distributions. All compensation for employees should be processed through payroll, supported by appropriate documentation and internal policies. Payments to contractors should be governed by written contracts and comply with applicable procurement standards. If the auditee believes these costs are justifiable, they should consult the awarding agency for a determination and, if necessary, reimburse the federal award.
2022-002—Unallowable Gift Card Disbursements Charged to Federal Program Type of Finding: (F) Instance of Noncompliance Related to Federal Awards Funding Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services AL #: 93.231 – COVID-19: Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity Award #: Various Award Period: 09/30/2021 – 09/29/2026 Estimated Questioned Costs: $15,300 Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Statement of Condition AAIHB distributed gift cards to both salaried employees and independent contractors as a gesture of appreciation for working extended hours related to COVID-19 contact tracing efforts. The total value of the gift cards was approximately $15,300 and was charged to the COVID-19: Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity grant (AL #93.231). For contractors, these gift cards were provided in addition to their regular compensation. The gift card disbursements were not processed through payroll nor formalized in contract terms, and there is no documentation indicating the entity obtained approval from the awarding agency. Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR § 200.403, costs charged to federal awards must be necessary, reasonable, allocable, and conform to limitations set forth in federal regulations. Per 2 CFR § 200.421(e)(3), the cost of gifts—including cash or cash equivalents such as gift cards—is generally unallowable. Compensation for employees must comply with 2 CFR § 200.430, including support through written policies and documentation of time and effort. Contractor payments must align with procurement standards in 2 CFR § 200.318–200.324 and be governed by written contracts. Effect The use of federal funds to provide gift cards constitutes an unallowable cost under Uniform Guidance. The questioned amount may be subject to repayment to the awarding agency or passthrough entity. Cause The auditee sought to recognize the extraordinary efforts of personnel during the COVID-19 public health response. However, they were unaware that the use of gift cards for this purpose was inconsistent with Uniform Guidance and lacked prior approval or supporting policy. Recommendation We recommend the auditee discontinue the use of federal funds for gift card distributions. All compensation for employees should be processed through payroll, supported by appropriate documentation and internal policies. Payments to contractors should be governed by written contracts and comply with applicable procurement standards. If the auditee believes these costs are justifiable, they should consult the awarding agency for a determination and, if necessary, reimburse the federal award.
2022-002—Unallowable Gift Card Disbursements Charged to Federal Program Type of Finding: (F) Instance of Noncompliance Related to Federal Awards Funding Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services AL #: 93.231 – COVID-19: Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity Award #: Various Award Period: 09/30/2021 – 09/29/2026 Estimated Questioned Costs: $15,300 Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Statement of Condition AAIHB distributed gift cards to both salaried employees and independent contractors as a gesture of appreciation for working extended hours related to COVID-19 contact tracing efforts. The total value of the gift cards was approximately $15,300 and was charged to the COVID-19: Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity grant (AL #93.231). For contractors, these gift cards were provided in addition to their regular compensation. The gift card disbursements were not processed through payroll nor formalized in contract terms, and there is no documentation indicating the entity obtained approval from the awarding agency. Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR § 200.403, costs charged to federal awards must be necessary, reasonable, allocable, and conform to limitations set forth in federal regulations. Per 2 CFR § 200.421(e)(3), the cost of gifts—including cash or cash equivalents such as gift cards—is generally unallowable. Compensation for employees must comply with 2 CFR § 200.430, including support through written policies and documentation of time and effort. Contractor payments must align with procurement standards in 2 CFR § 200.318–200.324 and be governed by written contracts. Effect The use of federal funds to provide gift cards constitutes an unallowable cost under Uniform Guidance. The questioned amount may be subject to repayment to the awarding agency or passthrough entity. Cause The auditee sought to recognize the extraordinary efforts of personnel during the COVID-19 public health response. However, they were unaware that the use of gift cards for this purpose was inconsistent with Uniform Guidance and lacked prior approval or supporting policy. Recommendation We recommend the auditee discontinue the use of federal funds for gift card distributions. All compensation for employees should be processed through payroll, supported by appropriate documentation and internal policies. Payments to contractors should be governed by written contracts and comply with applicable procurement standards. If the auditee believes these costs are justifiable, they should consult the awarding agency for a determination and, if necessary, reimburse the federal award.
2022-002—Unallowable Gift Card Disbursements Charged to Federal Program Type of Finding: (F) Instance of Noncompliance Related to Federal Awards Funding Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services AL #: 93.231 – COVID-19: Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity Award #: Various Award Period: 09/30/2021 – 09/29/2026 Estimated Questioned Costs: $15,300 Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Statement of Condition AAIHB distributed gift cards to both salaried employees and independent contractors as a gesture of appreciation for working extended hours related to COVID-19 contact tracing efforts. The total value of the gift cards was approximately $15,300 and was charged to the COVID-19: Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity grant (AL #93.231). For contractors, these gift cards were provided in addition to their regular compensation. The gift card disbursements were not processed through payroll nor formalized in contract terms, and there is no documentation indicating the entity obtained approval from the awarding agency. Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR § 200.403, costs charged to federal awards must be necessary, reasonable, allocable, and conform to limitations set forth in federal regulations. Per 2 CFR § 200.421(e)(3), the cost of gifts—including cash or cash equivalents such as gift cards—is generally unallowable. Compensation for employees must comply with 2 CFR § 200.430, including support through written policies and documentation of time and effort. Contractor payments must align with procurement standards in 2 CFR § 200.318–200.324 and be governed by written contracts. Effect The use of federal funds to provide gift cards constitutes an unallowable cost under Uniform Guidance. The questioned amount may be subject to repayment to the awarding agency or passthrough entity. Cause The auditee sought to recognize the extraordinary efforts of personnel during the COVID-19 public health response. However, they were unaware that the use of gift cards for this purpose was inconsistent with Uniform Guidance and lacked prior approval or supporting policy. Recommendation We recommend the auditee discontinue the use of federal funds for gift card distributions. All compensation for employees should be processed through payroll, supported by appropriate documentation and internal policies. Payments to contractors should be governed by written contracts and comply with applicable procurement standards. If the auditee believes these costs are justifiable, they should consult the awarding agency for a determination and, if necessary, reimburse the federal award.
2022-002—Unallowable Gift Card Disbursements Charged to Federal Program Type of Finding: (F) Instance of Noncompliance Related to Federal Awards Funding Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services AL #: 93.231 – COVID-19: Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity Award #: Various Award Period: 09/30/2021 – 09/29/2026 Estimated Questioned Costs: $15,300 Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Statement of Condition AAIHB distributed gift cards to both salaried employees and independent contractors as a gesture of appreciation for working extended hours related to COVID-19 contact tracing efforts. The total value of the gift cards was approximately $15,300 and was charged to the COVID-19: Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity grant (AL #93.231). For contractors, these gift cards were provided in addition to their regular compensation. The gift card disbursements were not processed through payroll nor formalized in contract terms, and there is no documentation indicating the entity obtained approval from the awarding agency. Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR § 200.403, costs charged to federal awards must be necessary, reasonable, allocable, and conform to limitations set forth in federal regulations. Per 2 CFR § 200.421(e)(3), the cost of gifts—including cash or cash equivalents such as gift cards—is generally unallowable. Compensation for employees must comply with 2 CFR § 200.430, including support through written policies and documentation of time and effort. Contractor payments must align with procurement standards in 2 CFR § 200.318–200.324 and be governed by written contracts. Effect The use of federal funds to provide gift cards constitutes an unallowable cost under Uniform Guidance. The questioned amount may be subject to repayment to the awarding agency or passthrough entity. Cause The auditee sought to recognize the extraordinary efforts of personnel during the COVID-19 public health response. However, they were unaware that the use of gift cards for this purpose was inconsistent with Uniform Guidance and lacked prior approval or supporting policy. Recommendation We recommend the auditee discontinue the use of federal funds for gift card distributions. All compensation for employees should be processed through payroll, supported by appropriate documentation and internal policies. Payments to contractors should be governed by written contracts and comply with applicable procurement standards. If the auditee believes these costs are justifiable, they should consult the awarding agency for a determination and, if necessary, reimburse the federal award.
2022-002—Unallowable Gift Card Disbursements Charged to Federal Program Type of Finding: (F) Instance of Noncompliance Related to Federal Awards Funding Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services AL #: 93.231 – COVID-19: Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity Award #: Various Award Period: 09/30/2021 – 09/29/2026 Estimated Questioned Costs: $15,300 Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Statement of Condition AAIHB distributed gift cards to both salaried employees and independent contractors as a gesture of appreciation for working extended hours related to COVID-19 contact tracing efforts. The total value of the gift cards was approximately $15,300 and was charged to the COVID-19: Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity grant (AL #93.231). For contractors, these gift cards were provided in addition to their regular compensation. The gift card disbursements were not processed through payroll nor formalized in contract terms, and there is no documentation indicating the entity obtained approval from the awarding agency. Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR § 200.403, costs charged to federal awards must be necessary, reasonable, allocable, and conform to limitations set forth in federal regulations. Per 2 CFR § 200.421(e)(3), the cost of gifts—including cash or cash equivalents such as gift cards—is generally unallowable. Compensation for employees must comply with 2 CFR § 200.430, including support through written policies and documentation of time and effort. Contractor payments must align with procurement standards in 2 CFR § 200.318–200.324 and be governed by written contracts. Effect The use of federal funds to provide gift cards constitutes an unallowable cost under Uniform Guidance. The questioned amount may be subject to repayment to the awarding agency or passthrough entity. Cause The auditee sought to recognize the extraordinary efforts of personnel during the COVID-19 public health response. However, they were unaware that the use of gift cards for this purpose was inconsistent with Uniform Guidance and lacked prior approval or supporting policy. Recommendation We recommend the auditee discontinue the use of federal funds for gift card distributions. All compensation for employees should be processed through payroll, supported by appropriate documentation and internal policies. Payments to contractors should be governed by written contracts and comply with applicable procurement standards. If the auditee believes these costs are justifiable, they should consult the awarding agency for a determination and, if necessary, reimburse the federal award.
2022-002—Unallowable Gift Card Disbursements Charged to Federal Program Type of Finding: (F) Instance of Noncompliance Related to Federal Awards Funding Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services AL #: 93.231 – COVID-19: Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity Award #: Various Award Period: 09/30/2021 – 09/29/2026 Estimated Questioned Costs: $15,300 Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Statement of Condition AAIHB distributed gift cards to both salaried employees and independent contractors as a gesture of appreciation for working extended hours related to COVID-19 contact tracing efforts. The total value of the gift cards was approximately $15,300 and was charged to the COVID-19: Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity grant (AL #93.231). For contractors, these gift cards were provided in addition to their regular compensation. The gift card disbursements were not processed through payroll nor formalized in contract terms, and there is no documentation indicating the entity obtained approval from the awarding agency. Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR § 200.403, costs charged to federal awards must be necessary, reasonable, allocable, and conform to limitations set forth in federal regulations. Per 2 CFR § 200.421(e)(3), the cost of gifts—including cash or cash equivalents such as gift cards—is generally unallowable. Compensation for employees must comply with 2 CFR § 200.430, including support through written policies and documentation of time and effort. Contractor payments must align with procurement standards in 2 CFR § 200.318–200.324 and be governed by written contracts. Effect The use of federal funds to provide gift cards constitutes an unallowable cost under Uniform Guidance. The questioned amount may be subject to repayment to the awarding agency or passthrough entity. Cause The auditee sought to recognize the extraordinary efforts of personnel during the COVID-19 public health response. However, they were unaware that the use of gift cards for this purpose was inconsistent with Uniform Guidance and lacked prior approval or supporting policy. Recommendation We recommend the auditee discontinue the use of federal funds for gift card distributions. All compensation for employees should be processed through payroll, supported by appropriate documentation and internal policies. Payments to contractors should be governed by written contracts and comply with applicable procurement standards. If the auditee believes these costs are justifiable, they should consult the awarding agency for a determination and, if necessary, reimburse the federal award.
2022-002—Unallowable Gift Card Disbursements Charged to Federal Program Type of Finding: (F) Instance of Noncompliance Related to Federal Awards Funding Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services AL #: 93.231 – COVID-19: Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity Award #: Various Award Period: 09/30/2021 – 09/29/2026 Estimated Questioned Costs: $15,300 Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Statement of Condition AAIHB distributed gift cards to both salaried employees and independent contractors as a gesture of appreciation for working extended hours related to COVID-19 contact tracing efforts. The total value of the gift cards was approximately $15,300 and was charged to the COVID-19: Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity grant (AL #93.231). For contractors, these gift cards were provided in addition to their regular compensation. The gift card disbursements were not processed through payroll nor formalized in contract terms, and there is no documentation indicating the entity obtained approval from the awarding agency. Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR § 200.403, costs charged to federal awards must be necessary, reasonable, allocable, and conform to limitations set forth in federal regulations. Per 2 CFR § 200.421(e)(3), the cost of gifts—including cash or cash equivalents such as gift cards—is generally unallowable. Compensation for employees must comply with 2 CFR § 200.430, including support through written policies and documentation of time and effort. Contractor payments must align with procurement standards in 2 CFR § 200.318–200.324 and be governed by written contracts. Effect The use of federal funds to provide gift cards constitutes an unallowable cost under Uniform Guidance. The questioned amount may be subject to repayment to the awarding agency or passthrough entity. Cause The auditee sought to recognize the extraordinary efforts of personnel during the COVID-19 public health response. However, they were unaware that the use of gift cards for this purpose was inconsistent with Uniform Guidance and lacked prior approval or supporting policy. Recommendation We recommend the auditee discontinue the use of federal funds for gift card distributions. All compensation for employees should be processed through payroll, supported by appropriate documentation and internal policies. Payments to contractors should be governed by written contracts and comply with applicable procurement standards. If the auditee believes these costs are justifiable, they should consult the awarding agency for a determination and, if necessary, reimburse the federal award.
2022-002—Unallowable Gift Card Disbursements Charged to Federal Program Type of Finding: (F) Instance of Noncompliance Related to Federal Awards Funding Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services AL #: 93.231 – COVID-19: Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity Award #: Various Award Period: 09/30/2021 – 09/29/2026 Estimated Questioned Costs: $15,300 Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Statement of Condition AAIHB distributed gift cards to both salaried employees and independent contractors as a gesture of appreciation for working extended hours related to COVID-19 contact tracing efforts. The total value of the gift cards was approximately $15,300 and was charged to the COVID-19: Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity grant (AL #93.231). For contractors, these gift cards were provided in addition to their regular compensation. The gift card disbursements were not processed through payroll nor formalized in contract terms, and there is no documentation indicating the entity obtained approval from the awarding agency. Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR § 200.403, costs charged to federal awards must be necessary, reasonable, allocable, and conform to limitations set forth in federal regulations. Per 2 CFR § 200.421(e)(3), the cost of gifts—including cash or cash equivalents such as gift cards—is generally unallowable. Compensation for employees must comply with 2 CFR § 200.430, including support through written policies and documentation of time and effort. Contractor payments must align with procurement standards in 2 CFR § 200.318–200.324 and be governed by written contracts. Effect The use of federal funds to provide gift cards constitutes an unallowable cost under Uniform Guidance. The questioned amount may be subject to repayment to the awarding agency or passthrough entity. Cause The auditee sought to recognize the extraordinary efforts of personnel during the COVID-19 public health response. However, they were unaware that the use of gift cards for this purpose was inconsistent with Uniform Guidance and lacked prior approval or supporting policy. Recommendation We recommend the auditee discontinue the use of federal funds for gift card distributions. All compensation for employees should be processed through payroll, supported by appropriate documentation and internal policies. Payments to contractors should be governed by written contracts and comply with applicable procurement standards. If the auditee believes these costs are justifiable, they should consult the awarding agency for a determination and, if necessary, reimburse the federal award.
B. FINDINGS - FINANCIAL STATEMENT AUDIT IC-2022-001: Financial Reporting (Material Weakness) Condition: Material misstatements within the financial statements were identified throughout the audit. Criteria: Management should have processes and procedures in place so as to be able to generate financial statements and reports that are complete and accurate on a timely basis and in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). Cause: The current size of the finance staffing of the County and School Board may not be sufficient to detect and prevent material errors. Effect: Financial statements and reports prepared in accordance with GAAP were not able to be generated accurately on a timely basis. Recommendation: We recommend that management re-evaluate the current staff structure and assignment of responsibilities in order to re-align roles and responsibilities with appropriate personnel or otherwise bolster their resource base so as to be able to meet the criteria. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: See Corrective Action Plan. C. FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS - MAJOR FEDERAL AWARD PROGRAM AUDIT FA-2022-001: Procurement (Material Weakness) Condition: The School Board?s written procurement policies do not include policies that cover CFR ?200.318e, ?200.318f, ?200.318i, ?200.319b, ?200.319c, ?200.319d, ?200.319e, ?200.320a1, ?200,322, ?200.324b, ?200.326 and ?200.327. Criteria: Non-federal entities must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR (Uniform Guidance) ?200.318 through ?200.327. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. Cause: The procurement policies for the School Board do not include the policies stated above, required by Uniform Guidance. Effect: The School Board?s policies do not comply with procurement requirements for federal awards (Uniform Guidance). Questioned Cost Amount: n/a Perspective Information: n/a Context: n/a Recommendation: Procurement policies should be reviewed and updated to be in compliance with the requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: See Corrective Action Plan.
Noncompliance and Material Weakness 2 CFR 3474.1 provides that the Department of Education (DOE) adopts the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Guidance in 2 CFR part 200. Thus, this section gives regulatory effect to the OMB guidance and supplements the guidance as needed for the DOE, except as otherwise noted in that section. Non-Federal entities other than States, including those operating Federal programs as subrecipients of States, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.327. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable State and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200. A nonfederal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR 200.318, which include oversight of contractors? performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR 200.320(a)(1) and (2). Under the micro-purchase method, the aggregate dollar amount does not exceed $10,000 ($2,000 in the case of acquisition for construction subject to the Wage Rate Requirements (Davis-Bacon Act)). Small purchase procedures are used for purchases that exceed the micro-purchase amount but do not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold ($250,000). Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive quotations if the non-Federal entity considers the price to be reasonable (2 CFR 200.320(a)(1)(ii)). If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources (2 CFR 200.320(a)(2)(i)). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-Federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR 200.320(b)(1); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR 200.320(b)(2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of five circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR 200.320(c). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR 200.324(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR 200.324(d)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR 200.327. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, ?Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.? Western Toledo Preparatory Academy Procurement Policy for Federal Grants indicates the following methods of procurement will be used for all purchases of goods and services made with federal funds: 1. Purchases under $2,000 require little formal documentation; they are likely to be a catalog purchase, with prices that are readily available from many vendors. A quick notation or copy of the prices checked from at least one other source should be attached to the order or noted in the file. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner that maximizes opportunities, increases quality (if a factor), and reduces cost of the purchase. 2. Purchases from $2,000 to $10,000 should have a telephone or other quotations and simple purchase or performance descriptions. Inquire in the open market to ensure an advantageous price and quality. The file should document the inquiries made and offers received from at least three sources. 3. Purchases from $10,000 to $100,000 should be treated more formally, though the acquisition procedures can still be somewhat streamlined. Consider using mini-proposals for negotiated acquisitions; more formal purchase and performance descriptions should be included, with bid responses requirements spelled out. To ensure that you have an adequate number of bidders, you may wish to advertise and devise pre-qualification procedures aimed at vendors who offer goods and services you use often. Purchases over $10,000 require grater documentation and cost allowability, need for the procurement, and the vendor selection. Request competitive quotes orally or in writing, from at least three different sources. The file shall document each invitation made and offer received. Document Prices: Maintain files on all quotations solicited and offers and bides received and any criteria for selection. In all instances in which the lowest bid is not awarded in the contract, justification for the selection must me contained in the file. Due to deficiencies in monitoring compliance over procurement, 18 percent of the procurements did not contain the required price or rate quotations. The Academy expended the following amounts without using the proper procurement method: o $30,559 was paid to a vendor for materials and installation of a projector; however, the Academy could not provide documentation to support the required price quotations were obtained from a minimum of three vendors. o $17,588 was paid to a vendor for materials and installation of a video surveillance system; however, the Academy could not provide documentation to support the required price quotations were obtained from a minimum of three vendors. Without proper controls over procurement, there is an increased risk that the Academy is not in compliance with applicable federal regulations. Noncompliance could result in federal funding being reduced or taken away, or other sanctions imposed by the federal grantor agency. The Academy should review the procurement requirements specified above and ensure the proper procurement method is used. The Academy should also maintain adequate documentation to detail the history of procurement. Officials? Response: See Corrective Action Plan
2 CFR 3474.1 provides that the Department of Education (DOE) adopts the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Guidance in 2 CFR part 200. Thus, this section gives regulatory effect to the OMB guidance and supplements the guidance as needed for the DOE, except as otherwise noted in that section. Non-Federal entities other than States, including those operating Federal programs as subrecipients of States, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.327. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable State and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200. A nonfederal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR 200.318, which include oversight of contractors? performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR 200.320(a)(1) and (2). Under the micro-purchase method, the aggregate dollar amount does not exceed $10,000 ($2,000 in the case of acquisition for construction subject to the Wage Rate Requirements (Davis-Bacon Act)). Small purchase procedures are used for purchases that exceed the micro-purchase amount but do not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold ($250,000). Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive quotations if the non-Federal entity considers the price to be reasonable (2 CFR 200.320(a)(1)(ii)). If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources (2 CFR 200.320(a)(2)(i)). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-Federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR 200.320(b)(1); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR 200.320(b)(2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of five circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR 200.320(c). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR 200.324(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR 200.324(d)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR 200.327. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, ?Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards. Black River Local School District Board Policy DJF-R ? Purchasing Procedures indicates the following methods of procurement will be used for all purchases of goods and services made with federal funds: 1. Micro-purchases are purchases up to $10,000 and may be made in accordance with District purchasing procedures when the costs are reasonable. To the extent practicable, these purchases are distributed equitably among qualified suppliers. 2. Small purchase are purchases between $10,000 and $250,000. Prior to authorizing the purchase, the District will try to obtain price rates or quotations from a minimum of three vendors or providers. The District will obtain these price rates or quotations by written quotes. 3. Sealed bid procedures are used for firm fixed price contracts over $250,000 and is used as the preferred method for construction projects. Bids are solicited from an adequate number of known suppliers, which cannot be less than two responsible bidders. The District will solicit bids by posting bids using at least one public posting source. The contract will be awarded to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder. 4. Competitive proposals are used for all purchases over $250,000 for which sealed bids are not appropriate and must be used for architectural or engineering services. Contracts entered into for competitive proposals may be fixed-price or cost reimbursement. The District will publicize a request for proposal by advertising through the local paper or using a procurement source. The District will evaluate proposals in order to award the contract to the most advantageous proposal when considering cost and other factors. The District will evaluate proposals by checklist and compare. 5. Sole source procurement is used only when the goods or services are only available from a single source; a public exigency or emergency exists; there is inadequate competition and the applicable pass through entity approves this method. Lack of proper internal controls over Federal Grants management led to the District expending the following amounts without using the proper procurement method: Education Stabilization Fund - Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER II) Fund, AL #84.425D ? $33,000 was paid to a vendor for electrical work related to a HVAC project; however, the District could not provide documentation to support the required price quotations were obtained from a minimum of three vendors. ? $350,000 was paid to a vendor for a HVAC project; however, the District could not provide documentation to support sealed bids were solicited and received, and the contract awarded to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder. ? $226,752 was paid to a vendor for a HVAC project; however, the District could not provide documentation to support the required price quotations were obtained from a minimum of three vendors. Education Stabilization Fund - American Rescue Plan Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ARP ESSER) Fund, AL #84.425U ? $1,898,392 was paid to a vendor for the design and build of kindergarten and high school classrooms; however, the District could not provide documentation to support sealed bids were solicited and received and the contract awarded to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder. Without proper controls over procurement, there is an increased risk that the District is not in compliance with applicable federal regulations. Noncompliance could result in federal funding being reduced or taken away, or other sanctions imposed by the federal grantor agency. The District should review the procurement requirements specified above and ensure the proper procurement method is used. The District should also maintain adequate documentation to detail the history of procurement.
2 CFR 3474.1 provides that the Department of Education (DOE) adopts the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Guidance in 2 CFR part 200. Thus, this section gives regulatory effect to the OMB guidance and supplements the guidance as needed for the DOE, except as otherwise noted in that section. Non-Federal entities other than States, including those operating Federal programs as subrecipients of States, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.327. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable State and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200. A nonfederal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR 200.318, which include oversight of contractors? performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR 200.320(a)(1) and (2). Under the micro-purchase method, the aggregate dollar amount does not exceed $10,000 ($2,000 in the case of acquisition for construction subject to the Wage Rate Requirements (Davis-Bacon Act)). Small purchase procedures are used for purchases that exceed the micro-purchase amount but do not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold ($250,000). Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive quotations if the non-Federal entity considers the price to be reasonable (2 CFR 200.320(a)(1)(ii)). If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources (2 CFR 200.320(a)(2)(i)). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-Federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR 200.320(b)(1); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR 200.320(b)(2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of five circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR 200.320(c). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR 200.324(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR 200.324(d)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR 200.327. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, ?Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards. Black River Local School District Board Policy DJF-R ? Purchasing Procedures indicates the following methods of procurement will be used for all purchases of goods and services made with federal funds: 1. Micro-purchases are purchases up to $10,000 and may be made in accordance with District purchasing procedures when the costs are reasonable. To the extent practicable, these purchases are distributed equitably among qualified suppliers. 2. Small purchase are purchases between $10,000 and $250,000. Prior to authorizing the purchase, the District will try to obtain price rates or quotations from a minimum of three vendors or providers. The District will obtain these price rates or quotations by written quotes. 3. Sealed bid procedures are used for firm fixed price contracts over $250,000 and is used as the preferred method for construction projects. Bids are solicited from an adequate number of known suppliers, which cannot be less than two responsible bidders. The District will solicit bids by posting bids using at least one public posting source. The contract will be awarded to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder. 4. Competitive proposals are used for all purchases over $250,000 for which sealed bids are not appropriate and must be used for architectural or engineering services. Contracts entered into for competitive proposals may be fixed-price or cost reimbursement. The District will publicize a request for proposal by advertising through the local paper or using a procurement source. The District will evaluate proposals in order to award the contract to the most advantageous proposal when considering cost and other factors. The District will evaluate proposals by checklist and compare. 5. Sole source procurement is used only when the goods or services are only available from a single source; a public exigency or emergency exists; there is inadequate competition and the applicable pass through entity approves this method. Lack of proper internal controls over Federal Grants management led to the District expending the following amounts without using the proper procurement method: Education Stabilization Fund - Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER II) Fund, AL #84.425D ? $33,000 was paid to a vendor for electrical work related to a HVAC project; however, the District could not provide documentation to support the required price quotations were obtained from a minimum of three vendors. ? $350,000 was paid to a vendor for a HVAC project; however, the District could not provide documentation to support sealed bids were solicited and received, and the contract awarded to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder. ? $226,752 was paid to a vendor for a HVAC project; however, the District could not provide documentation to support the required price quotations were obtained from a minimum of three vendors. Education Stabilization Fund - American Rescue Plan Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ARP ESSER) Fund, AL #84.425U ? $1,898,392 was paid to a vendor for the design and build of kindergarten and high school classrooms; however, the District could not provide documentation to support sealed bids were solicited and received and the contract awarded to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder. Without proper controls over procurement, there is an increased risk that the District is not in compliance with applicable federal regulations. Noncompliance could result in federal funding being reduced or taken away, or other sanctions imposed by the federal grantor agency. The District should review the procurement requirements specified above and ensure the proper procurement method is used. The District should also maintain adequate documentation to detail the history of procurement.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 14.231, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Emergency Solutions Grant Program, including COVID-19 ALN 20.507 and 20.526, Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Cluster, including COVID 19 Federal Award Identification Number and Year - ALN 14.231: E19MC260006, E20MC260006, E20MW260006, E21MC260006 ALN 20.507 and 20.526: All awards included on the schedule under the ALNs Pass through Entity - N/A Finding Type Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - A nonfederal entity must have adequate procedures in place to verify that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded (2 CFR sections 200.212 and 200.318(h); 2 CFR section 180.300; 48 CFR section 52.209 6). Additionally, a nonfederal entity requires a cost price analysis to be performed with every procurement action in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold (2 CFR section 200.324). Condition During procurement testing, we noted two contracts for which the City did not review sam.gov to ensure the entity was not suspended or debarred. Additionally, we noted one contract for which the City did not perform the required cost price analysis. Questioned Costs - None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - The contracts identified above was tested among a sample of 15 contracts in total, a sample of 8 for ESG and a sample of 7 for FTC. Cause and Effect - The City?s controls were not adequate to comply with suspension and debarment and cost price analysis requirements. A possible effect is that the City could be responsible for repaying costs charged to the grant if it enters into a transaction with an entity that is suspended or debarred or that the appropriate cost price analysis has not been performed. Recommendation We recommend the City implement adequate controls to ensure verification of debarment, suspension, or exclusion takes place before entering into covered transactions, and, when required, a cost price analysis is performed. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - The City will review its current procurement policy and implement additional controls as needed to help ensure verification is performed as required and the required processes are followed.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 14.231, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Emergency Solutions Grant Program, including COVID-19 ALN 20.507 and 20.526, Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Cluster, including COVID 19 Federal Award Identification Number and Year - ALN 14.231: E19MC260006, E20MC260006, E20MW260006, E21MC260006 ALN 20.507 and 20.526: All awards included on the schedule under the ALNs Pass through Entity - N/A Finding Type Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - A nonfederal entity must have adequate procedures in place to verify that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded (2 CFR sections 200.212 and 200.318(h); 2 CFR section 180.300; 48 CFR section 52.209 6). Additionally, a nonfederal entity requires a cost price analysis to be performed with every procurement action in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold (2 CFR section 200.324). Condition During procurement testing, we noted two contracts for which the City did not review sam.gov to ensure the entity was not suspended or debarred. Additionally, we noted one contract for which the City did not perform the required cost price analysis. Questioned Costs - None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - The contracts identified above was tested among a sample of 15 contracts in total, a sample of 8 for ESG and a sample of 7 for FTC. Cause and Effect - The City?s controls were not adequate to comply with suspension and debarment and cost price analysis requirements. A possible effect is that the City could be responsible for repaying costs charged to the grant if it enters into a transaction with an entity that is suspended or debarred or that the appropriate cost price analysis has not been performed. Recommendation We recommend the City implement adequate controls to ensure verification of debarment, suspension, or exclusion takes place before entering into covered transactions, and, when required, a cost price analysis is performed. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - The City will review its current procurement policy and implement additional controls as needed to help ensure verification is performed as required and the required processes are followed.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 14.231, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Emergency Solutions Grant Program, including COVID-19 ALN 20.507 and 20.526, Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Cluster, including COVID 19 Federal Award Identification Number and Year - ALN 14.231: E19MC260006, E20MC260006, E20MW260006, E21MC260006 ALN 20.507 and 20.526: All awards included on the schedule under the ALNs Pass through Entity - N/A Finding Type Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - A nonfederal entity must have adequate procedures in place to verify that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded (2 CFR sections 200.212 and 200.318(h); 2 CFR section 180.300; 48 CFR section 52.209 6). Additionally, a nonfederal entity requires a cost price analysis to be performed with every procurement action in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold (2 CFR section 200.324). Condition During procurement testing, we noted two contracts for which the City did not review sam.gov to ensure the entity was not suspended or debarred. Additionally, we noted one contract for which the City did not perform the required cost price analysis. Questioned Costs - None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - The contracts identified above was tested among a sample of 15 contracts in total, a sample of 8 for ESG and a sample of 7 for FTC. Cause and Effect - The City?s controls were not adequate to comply with suspension and debarment and cost price analysis requirements. A possible effect is that the City could be responsible for repaying costs charged to the grant if it enters into a transaction with an entity that is suspended or debarred or that the appropriate cost price analysis has not been performed. Recommendation We recommend the City implement adequate controls to ensure verification of debarment, suspension, or exclusion takes place before entering into covered transactions, and, when required, a cost price analysis is performed. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - The City will review its current procurement policy and implement additional controls as needed to help ensure verification is performed as required and the required processes are followed.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 14.231, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Emergency Solutions Grant Program, including COVID-19 ALN 20.507 and 20.526, Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Cluster, including COVID 19 Federal Award Identification Number and Year - ALN 14.231: E19MC260006, E20MC260006, E20MW260006, E21MC260006 ALN 20.507 and 20.526: All awards included on the schedule under the ALNs Pass through Entity - N/A Finding Type Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - A nonfederal entity must have adequate procedures in place to verify that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded (2 CFR sections 200.212 and 200.318(h); 2 CFR section 180.300; 48 CFR section 52.209 6). Additionally, a nonfederal entity requires a cost price analysis to be performed with every procurement action in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold (2 CFR section 200.324). Condition During procurement testing, we noted two contracts for which the City did not review sam.gov to ensure the entity was not suspended or debarred. Additionally, we noted one contract for which the City did not perform the required cost price analysis. Questioned Costs - None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - The contracts identified above was tested among a sample of 15 contracts in total, a sample of 8 for ESG and a sample of 7 for FTC. Cause and Effect - The City?s controls were not adequate to comply with suspension and debarment and cost price analysis requirements. A possible effect is that the City could be responsible for repaying costs charged to the grant if it enters into a transaction with an entity that is suspended or debarred or that the appropriate cost price analysis has not been performed. Recommendation We recommend the City implement adequate controls to ensure verification of debarment, suspension, or exclusion takes place before entering into covered transactions, and, when required, a cost price analysis is performed. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - The City will review its current procurement policy and implement additional controls as needed to help ensure verification is performed as required and the required processes are followed.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 14.231, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Emergency Solutions Grant Program, including COVID-19 ALN 20.507 and 20.526, Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Cluster, including COVID 19 Federal Award Identification Number and Year - ALN 14.231: E19MC260006, E20MC260006, E20MW260006, E21MC260006 ALN 20.507 and 20.526: All awards included on the schedule under the ALNs Pass through Entity - N/A Finding Type Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - A nonfederal entity must have adequate procedures in place to verify that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded (2 CFR sections 200.212 and 200.318(h); 2 CFR section 180.300; 48 CFR section 52.209 6). Additionally, a nonfederal entity requires a cost price analysis to be performed with every procurement action in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold (2 CFR section 200.324). Condition During procurement testing, we noted two contracts for which the City did not review sam.gov to ensure the entity was not suspended or debarred. Additionally, we noted one contract for which the City did not perform the required cost price analysis. Questioned Costs - None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - The contracts identified above was tested among a sample of 15 contracts in total, a sample of 8 for ESG and a sample of 7 for FTC. Cause and Effect - The City?s controls were not adequate to comply with suspension and debarment and cost price analysis requirements. A possible effect is that the City could be responsible for repaying costs charged to the grant if it enters into a transaction with an entity that is suspended or debarred or that the appropriate cost price analysis has not been performed. Recommendation We recommend the City implement adequate controls to ensure verification of debarment, suspension, or exclusion takes place before entering into covered transactions, and, when required, a cost price analysis is performed. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - The City will review its current procurement policy and implement additional controls as needed to help ensure verification is performed as required and the required processes are followed.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 14.231, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Emergency Solutions Grant Program, including COVID-19 ALN 20.507 and 20.526, Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Cluster, including COVID 19 Federal Award Identification Number and Year - ALN 14.231: E19MC260006, E20MC260006, E20MW260006, E21MC260006 ALN 20.507 and 20.526: All awards included on the schedule under the ALNs Pass through Entity - N/A Finding Type Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - A nonfederal entity must have adequate procedures in place to verify that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded (2 CFR sections 200.212 and 200.318(h); 2 CFR section 180.300; 48 CFR section 52.209 6). Additionally, a nonfederal entity requires a cost price analysis to be performed with every procurement action in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold (2 CFR section 200.324). Condition During procurement testing, we noted two contracts for which the City did not review sam.gov to ensure the entity was not suspended or debarred. Additionally, we noted one contract for which the City did not perform the required cost price analysis. Questioned Costs - None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - The contracts identified above was tested among a sample of 15 contracts in total, a sample of 8 for ESG and a sample of 7 for FTC. Cause and Effect - The City?s controls were not adequate to comply with suspension and debarment and cost price analysis requirements. A possible effect is that the City could be responsible for repaying costs charged to the grant if it enters into a transaction with an entity that is suspended or debarred or that the appropriate cost price analysis has not been performed. Recommendation We recommend the City implement adequate controls to ensure verification of debarment, suspension, or exclusion takes place before entering into covered transactions, and, when required, a cost price analysis is performed. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - The City will review its current procurement policy and implement additional controls as needed to help ensure verification is performed as required and the required processes are followed.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 14.231, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Emergency Solutions Grant Program, including COVID-19 ALN 20.507 and 20.526, Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Cluster, including COVID 19 Federal Award Identification Number and Year - ALN 14.231: E19MC260006, E20MC260006, E20MW260006, E21MC260006 ALN 20.507 and 20.526: All awards included on the schedule under the ALNs Pass through Entity - N/A Finding Type Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - A nonfederal entity must have adequate procedures in place to verify that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded (2 CFR sections 200.212 and 200.318(h); 2 CFR section 180.300; 48 CFR section 52.209 6). Additionally, a nonfederal entity requires a cost price analysis to be performed with every procurement action in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold (2 CFR section 200.324). Condition During procurement testing, we noted two contracts for which the City did not review sam.gov to ensure the entity was not suspended or debarred. Additionally, we noted one contract for which the City did not perform the required cost price analysis. Questioned Costs - None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - The contracts identified above was tested among a sample of 15 contracts in total, a sample of 8 for ESG and a sample of 7 for FTC. Cause and Effect - The City?s controls were not adequate to comply with suspension and debarment and cost price analysis requirements. A possible effect is that the City could be responsible for repaying costs charged to the grant if it enters into a transaction with an entity that is suspended or debarred or that the appropriate cost price analysis has not been performed. Recommendation We recommend the City implement adequate controls to ensure verification of debarment, suspension, or exclusion takes place before entering into covered transactions, and, when required, a cost price analysis is performed. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - The City will review its current procurement policy and implement additional controls as needed to help ensure verification is performed as required and the required processes are followed.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 14.231, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Emergency Solutions Grant Program, including COVID-19 ALN 20.507 and 20.526, Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Cluster, including COVID 19 Federal Award Identification Number and Year - ALN 14.231: E19MC260006, E20MC260006, E20MW260006, E21MC260006 ALN 20.507 and 20.526: All awards included on the schedule under the ALNs Pass through Entity - N/A Finding Type Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - A nonfederal entity must have adequate procedures in place to verify that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded (2 CFR sections 200.212 and 200.318(h); 2 CFR section 180.300; 48 CFR section 52.209 6). Additionally, a nonfederal entity requires a cost price analysis to be performed with every procurement action in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold (2 CFR section 200.324). Condition During procurement testing, we noted two contracts for which the City did not review sam.gov to ensure the entity was not suspended or debarred. Additionally, we noted one contract for which the City did not perform the required cost price analysis. Questioned Costs - None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - The contracts identified above was tested among a sample of 15 contracts in total, a sample of 8 for ESG and a sample of 7 for FTC. Cause and Effect - The City?s controls were not adequate to comply with suspension and debarment and cost price analysis requirements. A possible effect is that the City could be responsible for repaying costs charged to the grant if it enters into a transaction with an entity that is suspended or debarred or that the appropriate cost price analysis has not been performed. Recommendation We recommend the City implement adequate controls to ensure verification of debarment, suspension, or exclusion takes place before entering into covered transactions, and, when required, a cost price analysis is performed. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - The City will review its current procurement policy and implement additional controls as needed to help ensure verification is performed as required and the required processes are followed.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 14.231, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Emergency Solutions Grant Program, including COVID-19 ALN 20.507 and 20.526, Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Cluster, including COVID 19 Federal Award Identification Number and Year - ALN 14.231: E19MC260006, E20MC260006, E20MW260006, E21MC260006 ALN 20.507 and 20.526: All awards included on the schedule under the ALNs Pass through Entity - N/A Finding Type Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - A nonfederal entity must have adequate procedures in place to verify that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded (2 CFR sections 200.212 and 200.318(h); 2 CFR section 180.300; 48 CFR section 52.209 6). Additionally, a nonfederal entity requires a cost price analysis to be performed with every procurement action in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold (2 CFR section 200.324). Condition During procurement testing, we noted two contracts for which the City did not review sam.gov to ensure the entity was not suspended or debarred. Additionally, we noted one contract for which the City did not perform the required cost price analysis. Questioned Costs - None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - The contracts identified above was tested among a sample of 15 contracts in total, a sample of 8 for ESG and a sample of 7 for FTC. Cause and Effect - The City?s controls were not adequate to comply with suspension and debarment and cost price analysis requirements. A possible effect is that the City could be responsible for repaying costs charged to the grant if it enters into a transaction with an entity that is suspended or debarred or that the appropriate cost price analysis has not been performed. Recommendation We recommend the City implement adequate controls to ensure verification of debarment, suspension, or exclusion takes place before entering into covered transactions, and, when required, a cost price analysis is performed. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - The City will review its current procurement policy and implement additional controls as needed to help ensure verification is performed as required and the required processes are followed.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 14.231, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Emergency Solutions Grant Program, including COVID-19 ALN 20.507 and 20.526, Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Cluster, including COVID 19 Federal Award Identification Number and Year - ALN 14.231: E19MC260006, E20MC260006, E20MW260006, E21MC260006 ALN 20.507 and 20.526: All awards included on the schedule under the ALNs Pass through Entity - N/A Finding Type Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - A nonfederal entity must have adequate procedures in place to verify that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded (2 CFR sections 200.212 and 200.318(h); 2 CFR section 180.300; 48 CFR section 52.209 6). Additionally, a nonfederal entity requires a cost price analysis to be performed with every procurement action in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold (2 CFR section 200.324). Condition During procurement testing, we noted two contracts for which the City did not review sam.gov to ensure the entity was not suspended or debarred. Additionally, we noted one contract for which the City did not perform the required cost price analysis. Questioned Costs - None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - The contracts identified above was tested among a sample of 15 contracts in total, a sample of 8 for ESG and a sample of 7 for FTC. Cause and Effect - The City?s controls were not adequate to comply with suspension and debarment and cost price analysis requirements. A possible effect is that the City could be responsible for repaying costs charged to the grant if it enters into a transaction with an entity that is suspended or debarred or that the appropriate cost price analysis has not been performed. Recommendation We recommend the City implement adequate controls to ensure verification of debarment, suspension, or exclusion takes place before entering into covered transactions, and, when required, a cost price analysis is performed. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - The City will review its current procurement policy and implement additional controls as needed to help ensure verification is performed as required and the required processes are followed.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 14.231, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Emergency Solutions Grant Program, including COVID-19 ALN 20.507 and 20.526, Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Cluster, including COVID 19 Federal Award Identification Number and Year - ALN 14.231: E19MC260006, E20MC260006, E20MW260006, E21MC260006 ALN 20.507 and 20.526: All awards included on the schedule under the ALNs Pass through Entity - N/A Finding Type Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - A nonfederal entity must have adequate procedures in place to verify that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded (2 CFR sections 200.212 and 200.318(h); 2 CFR section 180.300; 48 CFR section 52.209 6). Additionally, a nonfederal entity requires a cost price analysis to be performed with every procurement action in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold (2 CFR section 200.324). Condition During procurement testing, we noted two contracts for which the City did not review sam.gov to ensure the entity was not suspended or debarred. Additionally, we noted one contract for which the City did not perform the required cost price analysis. Questioned Costs - None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - The contracts identified above was tested among a sample of 15 contracts in total, a sample of 8 for ESG and a sample of 7 for FTC. Cause and Effect - The City?s controls were not adequate to comply with suspension and debarment and cost price analysis requirements. A possible effect is that the City could be responsible for repaying costs charged to the grant if it enters into a transaction with an entity that is suspended or debarred or that the appropriate cost price analysis has not been performed. Recommendation We recommend the City implement adequate controls to ensure verification of debarment, suspension, or exclusion takes place before entering into covered transactions, and, when required, a cost price analysis is performed. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - The City will review its current procurement policy and implement additional controls as needed to help ensure verification is performed as required and the required processes are followed.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 14.231, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Emergency Solutions Grant Program, including COVID-19 ALN 20.507 and 20.526, Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Cluster, including COVID 19 Federal Award Identification Number and Year - ALN 14.231: E19MC260006, E20MC260006, E20MW260006, E21MC260006 ALN 20.507 and 20.526: All awards included on the schedule under the ALNs Pass through Entity - N/A Finding Type Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - A nonfederal entity must have adequate procedures in place to verify that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded (2 CFR sections 200.212 and 200.318(h); 2 CFR section 180.300; 48 CFR section 52.209 6). Additionally, a nonfederal entity requires a cost price analysis to be performed with every procurement action in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold (2 CFR section 200.324). Condition During procurement testing, we noted two contracts for which the City did not review sam.gov to ensure the entity was not suspended or debarred. Additionally, we noted one contract for which the City did not perform the required cost price analysis. Questioned Costs - None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - The contracts identified above was tested among a sample of 15 contracts in total, a sample of 8 for ESG and a sample of 7 for FTC. Cause and Effect - The City?s controls were not adequate to comply with suspension and debarment and cost price analysis requirements. A possible effect is that the City could be responsible for repaying costs charged to the grant if it enters into a transaction with an entity that is suspended or debarred or that the appropriate cost price analysis has not been performed. Recommendation We recommend the City implement adequate controls to ensure verification of debarment, suspension, or exclusion takes place before entering into covered transactions, and, when required, a cost price analysis is performed. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - The City will review its current procurement policy and implement additional controls as needed to help ensure verification is performed as required and the required processes are followed.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 14.231, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Emergency Solutions Grant Program, including COVID-19 ALN 20.507 and 20.526, Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Cluster, including COVID 19 Federal Award Identification Number and Year - ALN 14.231: E19MC260006, E20MC260006, E20MW260006, E21MC260006 ALN 20.507 and 20.526: All awards included on the schedule under the ALNs Pass through Entity - N/A Finding Type Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - A nonfederal entity must have adequate procedures in place to verify that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded (2 CFR sections 200.212 and 200.318(h); 2 CFR section 180.300; 48 CFR section 52.209 6). Additionally, a nonfederal entity requires a cost price analysis to be performed with every procurement action in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold (2 CFR section 200.324). Condition During procurement testing, we noted two contracts for which the City did not review sam.gov to ensure the entity was not suspended or debarred. Additionally, we noted one contract for which the City did not perform the required cost price analysis. Questioned Costs - None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - The contracts identified above was tested among a sample of 15 contracts in total, a sample of 8 for ESG and a sample of 7 for FTC. Cause and Effect - The City?s controls were not adequate to comply with suspension and debarment and cost price analysis requirements. A possible effect is that the City could be responsible for repaying costs charged to the grant if it enters into a transaction with an entity that is suspended or debarred or that the appropriate cost price analysis has not been performed. Recommendation We recommend the City implement adequate controls to ensure verification of debarment, suspension, or exclusion takes place before entering into covered transactions, and, when required, a cost price analysis is performed. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - The City will review its current procurement policy and implement additional controls as needed to help ensure verification is performed as required and the required processes are followed.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 14.231, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Emergency Solutions Grant Program, including COVID-19 ALN 20.507 and 20.526, Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Cluster, including COVID 19 Federal Award Identification Number and Year - ALN 14.231: E19MC260006, E20MC260006, E20MW260006, E21MC260006 ALN 20.507 and 20.526: All awards included on the schedule under the ALNs Pass through Entity - N/A Finding Type Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - A nonfederal entity must have adequate procedures in place to verify that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded (2 CFR sections 200.212 and 200.318(h); 2 CFR section 180.300; 48 CFR section 52.209 6). Additionally, a nonfederal entity requires a cost price analysis to be performed with every procurement action in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold (2 CFR section 200.324). Condition During procurement testing, we noted two contracts for which the City did not review sam.gov to ensure the entity was not suspended or debarred. Additionally, we noted one contract for which the City did not perform the required cost price analysis. Questioned Costs - None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - The contracts identified above was tested among a sample of 15 contracts in total, a sample of 8 for ESG and a sample of 7 for FTC. Cause and Effect - The City?s controls were not adequate to comply with suspension and debarment and cost price analysis requirements. A possible effect is that the City could be responsible for repaying costs charged to the grant if it enters into a transaction with an entity that is suspended or debarred or that the appropriate cost price analysis has not been performed. Recommendation We recommend the City implement adequate controls to ensure verification of debarment, suspension, or exclusion takes place before entering into covered transactions, and, when required, a cost price analysis is performed. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - The City will review its current procurement policy and implement additional controls as needed to help ensure verification is performed as required and the required processes are followed.
B. FINDINGS - FINANCIAL STATEMENT AUDIT IC-2022-001: Financial Reporting (Material Weakness) Condition: Material misstatements within the financial statements were identified throughout the audit. Criteria: Management should have processes and procedures in place so as to be able to generate financial statements and reports that are complete and accurate on a timely basis and in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). Cause: The current size of the finance staffing of the County and School Board may not be sufficient to detect and prevent material errors. Effect: Financial statements and reports prepared in accordance with GAAP were not able to be generated accurately on a timely basis. Recommendation: We recommend that management re-evaluate the current staff structure and assignment of responsibilities in order to re-align roles and responsibilities with appropriate personnel or otherwise bolster their resource base so as to be able to meet the criteria. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: See Corrective Action Plan. C. FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS - MAJOR FEDERAL AWARD PROGRAM AUDIT FA-2022-001: Procurement (Material Weakness) Condition: The School Board?s written procurement policies do not include policies that cover CFR ?200.318e, ?200.318f, ?200.318i, ?200.319b, ?200.319c, ?200.319d, ?200.319e, ?200.320a1, ?200,322, ?200.324b, ?200.326 and ?200.327. Criteria: Non-federal entities must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR (Uniform Guidance) ?200.318 through ?200.327. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. Cause: The procurement policies for the School Board do not include the policies stated above, required by Uniform Guidance. Effect: The School Board?s policies do not comply with procurement requirements for federal awards (Uniform Guidance). Questioned Cost Amount: n/a Perspective Information: n/a Context: n/a Recommendation: Procurement policies should be reviewed and updated to be in compliance with the requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: See Corrective Action Plan.
Noncompliance and Material Weakness 2 CFR 3474.1 provides that the Department of Education (DOE) adopts the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Guidance in 2 CFR part 200. Thus, this section gives regulatory effect to the OMB guidance and supplements the guidance as needed for the DOE, except as otherwise noted in that section. Non-Federal entities other than States, including those operating Federal programs as subrecipients of States, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.327. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable State and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200. A nonfederal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR 200.318, which include oversight of contractors? performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR 200.320(a)(1) and (2). Under the micro-purchase method, the aggregate dollar amount does not exceed $10,000 ($2,000 in the case of acquisition for construction subject to the Wage Rate Requirements (Davis-Bacon Act)). Small purchase procedures are used for purchases that exceed the micro-purchase amount but do not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold ($250,000). Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive quotations if the non-Federal entity considers the price to be reasonable (2 CFR 200.320(a)(1)(ii)). If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources (2 CFR 200.320(a)(2)(i)). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-Federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR 200.320(b)(1); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR 200.320(b)(2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of five circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR 200.320(c). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR 200.324(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR 200.324(d)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR 200.327. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, ?Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.? Western Toledo Preparatory Academy Procurement Policy for Federal Grants indicates the following methods of procurement will be used for all purchases of goods and services made with federal funds: 1. Purchases under $2,000 require little formal documentation; they are likely to be a catalog purchase, with prices that are readily available from many vendors. A quick notation or copy of the prices checked from at least one other source should be attached to the order or noted in the file. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner that maximizes opportunities, increases quality (if a factor), and reduces cost of the purchase. 2. Purchases from $2,000 to $10,000 should have a telephone or other quotations and simple purchase or performance descriptions. Inquire in the open market to ensure an advantageous price and quality. The file should document the inquiries made and offers received from at least three sources. 3. Purchases from $10,000 to $100,000 should be treated more formally, though the acquisition procedures can still be somewhat streamlined. Consider using mini-proposals for negotiated acquisitions; more formal purchase and performance descriptions should be included, with bid responses requirements spelled out. To ensure that you have an adequate number of bidders, you may wish to advertise and devise pre-qualification procedures aimed at vendors who offer goods and services you use often. Purchases over $10,000 require grater documentation and cost allowability, need for the procurement, and the vendor selection. Request competitive quotes orally or in writing, from at least three different sources. The file shall document each invitation made and offer received. Document Prices: Maintain files on all quotations solicited and offers and bides received and any criteria for selection. In all instances in which the lowest bid is not awarded in the contract, justification for the selection must me contained in the file. Due to deficiencies in monitoring compliance over procurement, 18 percent of the procurements did not contain the required price or rate quotations. The Academy expended the following amounts without using the proper procurement method: o $30,559 was paid to a vendor for materials and installation of a projector; however, the Academy could not provide documentation to support the required price quotations were obtained from a minimum of three vendors. o $17,588 was paid to a vendor for materials and installation of a video surveillance system; however, the Academy could not provide documentation to support the required price quotations were obtained from a minimum of three vendors. Without proper controls over procurement, there is an increased risk that the Academy is not in compliance with applicable federal regulations. Noncompliance could result in federal funding being reduced or taken away, or other sanctions imposed by the federal grantor agency. The Academy should review the procurement requirements specified above and ensure the proper procurement method is used. The Academy should also maintain adequate documentation to detail the history of procurement. Officials? Response: See Corrective Action Plan
2 CFR 3474.1 provides that the Department of Education (DOE) adopts the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Guidance in 2 CFR part 200. Thus, this section gives regulatory effect to the OMB guidance and supplements the guidance as needed for the DOE, except as otherwise noted in that section. Non-Federal entities other than States, including those operating Federal programs as subrecipients of States, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.327. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable State and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200. A nonfederal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR 200.318, which include oversight of contractors? performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR 200.320(a)(1) and (2). Under the micro-purchase method, the aggregate dollar amount does not exceed $10,000 ($2,000 in the case of acquisition for construction subject to the Wage Rate Requirements (Davis-Bacon Act)). Small purchase procedures are used for purchases that exceed the micro-purchase amount but do not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold ($250,000). Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive quotations if the non-Federal entity considers the price to be reasonable (2 CFR 200.320(a)(1)(ii)). If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources (2 CFR 200.320(a)(2)(i)). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-Federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR 200.320(b)(1); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR 200.320(b)(2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of five circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR 200.320(c). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR 200.324(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR 200.324(d)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR 200.327. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, ?Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards. Black River Local School District Board Policy DJF-R ? Purchasing Procedures indicates the following methods of procurement will be used for all purchases of goods and services made with federal funds: 1. Micro-purchases are purchases up to $10,000 and may be made in accordance with District purchasing procedures when the costs are reasonable. To the extent practicable, these purchases are distributed equitably among qualified suppliers. 2. Small purchase are purchases between $10,000 and $250,000. Prior to authorizing the purchase, the District will try to obtain price rates or quotations from a minimum of three vendors or providers. The District will obtain these price rates or quotations by written quotes. 3. Sealed bid procedures are used for firm fixed price contracts over $250,000 and is used as the preferred method for construction projects. Bids are solicited from an adequate number of known suppliers, which cannot be less than two responsible bidders. The District will solicit bids by posting bids using at least one public posting source. The contract will be awarded to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder. 4. Competitive proposals are used for all purchases over $250,000 for which sealed bids are not appropriate and must be used for architectural or engineering services. Contracts entered into for competitive proposals may be fixed-price or cost reimbursement. The District will publicize a request for proposal by advertising through the local paper or using a procurement source. The District will evaluate proposals in order to award the contract to the most advantageous proposal when considering cost and other factors. The District will evaluate proposals by checklist and compare. 5. Sole source procurement is used only when the goods or services are only available from a single source; a public exigency or emergency exists; there is inadequate competition and the applicable pass through entity approves this method. Lack of proper internal controls over Federal Grants management led to the District expending the following amounts without using the proper procurement method: Education Stabilization Fund - Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER II) Fund, AL #84.425D ? $33,000 was paid to a vendor for electrical work related to a HVAC project; however, the District could not provide documentation to support the required price quotations were obtained from a minimum of three vendors. ? $350,000 was paid to a vendor for a HVAC project; however, the District could not provide documentation to support sealed bids were solicited and received, and the contract awarded to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder. ? $226,752 was paid to a vendor for a HVAC project; however, the District could not provide documentation to support the required price quotations were obtained from a minimum of three vendors. Education Stabilization Fund - American Rescue Plan Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ARP ESSER) Fund, AL #84.425U ? $1,898,392 was paid to a vendor for the design and build of kindergarten and high school classrooms; however, the District could not provide documentation to support sealed bids were solicited and received and the contract awarded to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder. Without proper controls over procurement, there is an increased risk that the District is not in compliance with applicable federal regulations. Noncompliance could result in federal funding being reduced or taken away, or other sanctions imposed by the federal grantor agency. The District should review the procurement requirements specified above and ensure the proper procurement method is used. The District should also maintain adequate documentation to detail the history of procurement.
2 CFR 3474.1 provides that the Department of Education (DOE) adopts the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Guidance in 2 CFR part 200. Thus, this section gives regulatory effect to the OMB guidance and supplements the guidance as needed for the DOE, except as otherwise noted in that section. Non-Federal entities other than States, including those operating Federal programs as subrecipients of States, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.327. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable State and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200. A nonfederal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR 200.318, which include oversight of contractors? performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR 200.320(a)(1) and (2). Under the micro-purchase method, the aggregate dollar amount does not exceed $10,000 ($2,000 in the case of acquisition for construction subject to the Wage Rate Requirements (Davis-Bacon Act)). Small purchase procedures are used for purchases that exceed the micro-purchase amount but do not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold ($250,000). Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive quotations if the non-Federal entity considers the price to be reasonable (2 CFR 200.320(a)(1)(ii)). If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources (2 CFR 200.320(a)(2)(i)). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-Federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR 200.320(b)(1); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR 200.320(b)(2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of five circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR 200.320(c). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR 200.324(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR 200.324(d)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR 200.327. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, ?Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards. Black River Local School District Board Policy DJF-R ? Purchasing Procedures indicates the following methods of procurement will be used for all purchases of goods and services made with federal funds: 1. Micro-purchases are purchases up to $10,000 and may be made in accordance with District purchasing procedures when the costs are reasonable. To the extent practicable, these purchases are distributed equitably among qualified suppliers. 2. Small purchase are purchases between $10,000 and $250,000. Prior to authorizing the purchase, the District will try to obtain price rates or quotations from a minimum of three vendors or providers. The District will obtain these price rates or quotations by written quotes. 3. Sealed bid procedures are used for firm fixed price contracts over $250,000 and is used as the preferred method for construction projects. Bids are solicited from an adequate number of known suppliers, which cannot be less than two responsible bidders. The District will solicit bids by posting bids using at least one public posting source. The contract will be awarded to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder. 4. Competitive proposals are used for all purchases over $250,000 for which sealed bids are not appropriate and must be used for architectural or engineering services. Contracts entered into for competitive proposals may be fixed-price or cost reimbursement. The District will publicize a request for proposal by advertising through the local paper or using a procurement source. The District will evaluate proposals in order to award the contract to the most advantageous proposal when considering cost and other factors. The District will evaluate proposals by checklist and compare. 5. Sole source procurement is used only when the goods or services are only available from a single source; a public exigency or emergency exists; there is inadequate competition and the applicable pass through entity approves this method. Lack of proper internal controls over Federal Grants management led to the District expending the following amounts without using the proper procurement method: Education Stabilization Fund - Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER II) Fund, AL #84.425D ? $33,000 was paid to a vendor for electrical work related to a HVAC project; however, the District could not provide documentation to support the required price quotations were obtained from a minimum of three vendors. ? $350,000 was paid to a vendor for a HVAC project; however, the District could not provide documentation to support sealed bids were solicited and received, and the contract awarded to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder. ? $226,752 was paid to a vendor for a HVAC project; however, the District could not provide documentation to support the required price quotations were obtained from a minimum of three vendors. Education Stabilization Fund - American Rescue Plan Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ARP ESSER) Fund, AL #84.425U ? $1,898,392 was paid to a vendor for the design and build of kindergarten and high school classrooms; however, the District could not provide documentation to support sealed bids were solicited and received and the contract awarded to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder. Without proper controls over procurement, there is an increased risk that the District is not in compliance with applicable federal regulations. Noncompliance could result in federal funding being reduced or taken away, or other sanctions imposed by the federal grantor agency. The District should review the procurement requirements specified above and ensure the proper procurement method is used. The District should also maintain adequate documentation to detail the history of procurement.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 14.231, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Emergency Solutions Grant Program, including COVID-19 ALN 20.507 and 20.526, Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Cluster, including COVID 19 Federal Award Identification Number and Year - ALN 14.231: E19MC260006, E20MC260006, E20MW260006, E21MC260006 ALN 20.507 and 20.526: All awards included on the schedule under the ALNs Pass through Entity - N/A Finding Type Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - A nonfederal entity must have adequate procedures in place to verify that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded (2 CFR sections 200.212 and 200.318(h); 2 CFR section 180.300; 48 CFR section 52.209 6). Additionally, a nonfederal entity requires a cost price analysis to be performed with every procurement action in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold (2 CFR section 200.324). Condition During procurement testing, we noted two contracts for which the City did not review sam.gov to ensure the entity was not suspended or debarred. Additionally, we noted one contract for which the City did not perform the required cost price analysis. Questioned Costs - None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - The contracts identified above was tested among a sample of 15 contracts in total, a sample of 8 for ESG and a sample of 7 for FTC. Cause and Effect - The City?s controls were not adequate to comply with suspension and debarment and cost price analysis requirements. A possible effect is that the City could be responsible for repaying costs charged to the grant if it enters into a transaction with an entity that is suspended or debarred or that the appropriate cost price analysis has not been performed. Recommendation We recommend the City implement adequate controls to ensure verification of debarment, suspension, or exclusion takes place before entering into covered transactions, and, when required, a cost price analysis is performed. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - The City will review its current procurement policy and implement additional controls as needed to help ensure verification is performed as required and the required processes are followed.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 14.231, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Emergency Solutions Grant Program, including COVID-19 ALN 20.507 and 20.526, Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Cluster, including COVID 19 Federal Award Identification Number and Year - ALN 14.231: E19MC260006, E20MC260006, E20MW260006, E21MC260006 ALN 20.507 and 20.526: All awards included on the schedule under the ALNs Pass through Entity - N/A Finding Type Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - A nonfederal entity must have adequate procedures in place to verify that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded (2 CFR sections 200.212 and 200.318(h); 2 CFR section 180.300; 48 CFR section 52.209 6). Additionally, a nonfederal entity requires a cost price analysis to be performed with every procurement action in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold (2 CFR section 200.324). Condition During procurement testing, we noted two contracts for which the City did not review sam.gov to ensure the entity was not suspended or debarred. Additionally, we noted one contract for which the City did not perform the required cost price analysis. Questioned Costs - None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - The contracts identified above was tested among a sample of 15 contracts in total, a sample of 8 for ESG and a sample of 7 for FTC. Cause and Effect - The City?s controls were not adequate to comply with suspension and debarment and cost price analysis requirements. A possible effect is that the City could be responsible for repaying costs charged to the grant if it enters into a transaction with an entity that is suspended or debarred or that the appropriate cost price analysis has not been performed. Recommendation We recommend the City implement adequate controls to ensure verification of debarment, suspension, or exclusion takes place before entering into covered transactions, and, when required, a cost price analysis is performed. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - The City will review its current procurement policy and implement additional controls as needed to help ensure verification is performed as required and the required processes are followed.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 14.231, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Emergency Solutions Grant Program, including COVID-19 ALN 20.507 and 20.526, Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Cluster, including COVID 19 Federal Award Identification Number and Year - ALN 14.231: E19MC260006, E20MC260006, E20MW260006, E21MC260006 ALN 20.507 and 20.526: All awards included on the schedule under the ALNs Pass through Entity - N/A Finding Type Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - A nonfederal entity must have adequate procedures in place to verify that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded (2 CFR sections 200.212 and 200.318(h); 2 CFR section 180.300; 48 CFR section 52.209 6). Additionally, a nonfederal entity requires a cost price analysis to be performed with every procurement action in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold (2 CFR section 200.324). Condition During procurement testing, we noted two contracts for which the City did not review sam.gov to ensure the entity was not suspended or debarred. Additionally, we noted one contract for which the City did not perform the required cost price analysis. Questioned Costs - None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - The contracts identified above was tested among a sample of 15 contracts in total, a sample of 8 for ESG and a sample of 7 for FTC. Cause and Effect - The City?s controls were not adequate to comply with suspension and debarment and cost price analysis requirements. A possible effect is that the City could be responsible for repaying costs charged to the grant if it enters into a transaction with an entity that is suspended or debarred or that the appropriate cost price analysis has not been performed. Recommendation We recommend the City implement adequate controls to ensure verification of debarment, suspension, or exclusion takes place before entering into covered transactions, and, when required, a cost price analysis is performed. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - The City will review its current procurement policy and implement additional controls as needed to help ensure verification is performed as required and the required processes are followed.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 14.231, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Emergency Solutions Grant Program, including COVID-19 ALN 20.507 and 20.526, Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Cluster, including COVID 19 Federal Award Identification Number and Year - ALN 14.231: E19MC260006, E20MC260006, E20MW260006, E21MC260006 ALN 20.507 and 20.526: All awards included on the schedule under the ALNs Pass through Entity - N/A Finding Type Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - A nonfederal entity must have adequate procedures in place to verify that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded (2 CFR sections 200.212 and 200.318(h); 2 CFR section 180.300; 48 CFR section 52.209 6). Additionally, a nonfederal entity requires a cost price analysis to be performed with every procurement action in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold (2 CFR section 200.324). Condition During procurement testing, we noted two contracts for which the City did not review sam.gov to ensure the entity was not suspended or debarred. Additionally, we noted one contract for which the City did not perform the required cost price analysis. Questioned Costs - None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - The contracts identified above was tested among a sample of 15 contracts in total, a sample of 8 for ESG and a sample of 7 for FTC. Cause and Effect - The City?s controls were not adequate to comply with suspension and debarment and cost price analysis requirements. A possible effect is that the City could be responsible for repaying costs charged to the grant if it enters into a transaction with an entity that is suspended or debarred or that the appropriate cost price analysis has not been performed. Recommendation We recommend the City implement adequate controls to ensure verification of debarment, suspension, or exclusion takes place before entering into covered transactions, and, when required, a cost price analysis is performed. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - The City will review its current procurement policy and implement additional controls as needed to help ensure verification is performed as required and the required processes are followed.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 14.231, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Emergency Solutions Grant Program, including COVID-19 ALN 20.507 and 20.526, Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Cluster, including COVID 19 Federal Award Identification Number and Year - ALN 14.231: E19MC260006, E20MC260006, E20MW260006, E21MC260006 ALN 20.507 and 20.526: All awards included on the schedule under the ALNs Pass through Entity - N/A Finding Type Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - A nonfederal entity must have adequate procedures in place to verify that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded (2 CFR sections 200.212 and 200.318(h); 2 CFR section 180.300; 48 CFR section 52.209 6). Additionally, a nonfederal entity requires a cost price analysis to be performed with every procurement action in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold (2 CFR section 200.324). Condition During procurement testing, we noted two contracts for which the City did not review sam.gov to ensure the entity was not suspended or debarred. Additionally, we noted one contract for which the City did not perform the required cost price analysis. Questioned Costs - None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - The contracts identified above was tested among a sample of 15 contracts in total, a sample of 8 for ESG and a sample of 7 for FTC. Cause and Effect - The City?s controls were not adequate to comply with suspension and debarment and cost price analysis requirements. A possible effect is that the City could be responsible for repaying costs charged to the grant if it enters into a transaction with an entity that is suspended or debarred or that the appropriate cost price analysis has not been performed. Recommendation We recommend the City implement adequate controls to ensure verification of debarment, suspension, or exclusion takes place before entering into covered transactions, and, when required, a cost price analysis is performed. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - The City will review its current procurement policy and implement additional controls as needed to help ensure verification is performed as required and the required processes are followed.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 14.231, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Emergency Solutions Grant Program, including COVID-19 ALN 20.507 and 20.526, Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Cluster, including COVID 19 Federal Award Identification Number and Year - ALN 14.231: E19MC260006, E20MC260006, E20MW260006, E21MC260006 ALN 20.507 and 20.526: All awards included on the schedule under the ALNs Pass through Entity - N/A Finding Type Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - A nonfederal entity must have adequate procedures in place to verify that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded (2 CFR sections 200.212 and 200.318(h); 2 CFR section 180.300; 48 CFR section 52.209 6). Additionally, a nonfederal entity requires a cost price analysis to be performed with every procurement action in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold (2 CFR section 200.324). Condition During procurement testing, we noted two contracts for which the City did not review sam.gov to ensure the entity was not suspended or debarred. Additionally, we noted one contract for which the City did not perform the required cost price analysis. Questioned Costs - None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - The contracts identified above was tested among a sample of 15 contracts in total, a sample of 8 for ESG and a sample of 7 for FTC. Cause and Effect - The City?s controls were not adequate to comply with suspension and debarment and cost price analysis requirements. A possible effect is that the City could be responsible for repaying costs charged to the grant if it enters into a transaction with an entity that is suspended or debarred or that the appropriate cost price analysis has not been performed. Recommendation We recommend the City implement adequate controls to ensure verification of debarment, suspension, or exclusion takes place before entering into covered transactions, and, when required, a cost price analysis is performed. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - The City will review its current procurement policy and implement additional controls as needed to help ensure verification is performed as required and the required processes are followed.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 14.231, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Emergency Solutions Grant Program, including COVID-19 ALN 20.507 and 20.526, Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Cluster, including COVID 19 Federal Award Identification Number and Year - ALN 14.231: E19MC260006, E20MC260006, E20MW260006, E21MC260006 ALN 20.507 and 20.526: All awards included on the schedule under the ALNs Pass through Entity - N/A Finding Type Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - A nonfederal entity must have adequate procedures in place to verify that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded (2 CFR sections 200.212 and 200.318(h); 2 CFR section 180.300; 48 CFR section 52.209 6). Additionally, a nonfederal entity requires a cost price analysis to be performed with every procurement action in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold (2 CFR section 200.324). Condition During procurement testing, we noted two contracts for which the City did not review sam.gov to ensure the entity was not suspended or debarred. Additionally, we noted one contract for which the City did not perform the required cost price analysis. Questioned Costs - None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - The contracts identified above was tested among a sample of 15 contracts in total, a sample of 8 for ESG and a sample of 7 for FTC. Cause and Effect - The City?s controls were not adequate to comply with suspension and debarment and cost price analysis requirements. A possible effect is that the City could be responsible for repaying costs charged to the grant if it enters into a transaction with an entity that is suspended or debarred or that the appropriate cost price analysis has not been performed. Recommendation We recommend the City implement adequate controls to ensure verification of debarment, suspension, or exclusion takes place before entering into covered transactions, and, when required, a cost price analysis is performed. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - The City will review its current procurement policy and implement additional controls as needed to help ensure verification is performed as required and the required processes are followed.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 14.231, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Emergency Solutions Grant Program, including COVID-19 ALN 20.507 and 20.526, Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Cluster, including COVID 19 Federal Award Identification Number and Year - ALN 14.231: E19MC260006, E20MC260006, E20MW260006, E21MC260006 ALN 20.507 and 20.526: All awards included on the schedule under the ALNs Pass through Entity - N/A Finding Type Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - A nonfederal entity must have adequate procedures in place to verify that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded (2 CFR sections 200.212 and 200.318(h); 2 CFR section 180.300; 48 CFR section 52.209 6). Additionally, a nonfederal entity requires a cost price analysis to be performed with every procurement action in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold (2 CFR section 200.324). Condition During procurement testing, we noted two contracts for which the City did not review sam.gov to ensure the entity was not suspended or debarred. Additionally, we noted one contract for which the City did not perform the required cost price analysis. Questioned Costs - None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - The contracts identified above was tested among a sample of 15 contracts in total, a sample of 8 for ESG and a sample of 7 for FTC. Cause and Effect - The City?s controls were not adequate to comply with suspension and debarment and cost price analysis requirements. A possible effect is that the City could be responsible for repaying costs charged to the grant if it enters into a transaction with an entity that is suspended or debarred or that the appropriate cost price analysis has not been performed. Recommendation We recommend the City implement adequate controls to ensure verification of debarment, suspension, or exclusion takes place before entering into covered transactions, and, when required, a cost price analysis is performed. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - The City will review its current procurement policy and implement additional controls as needed to help ensure verification is performed as required and the required processes are followed.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 14.231, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Emergency Solutions Grant Program, including COVID-19 ALN 20.507 and 20.526, Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Cluster, including COVID 19 Federal Award Identification Number and Year - ALN 14.231: E19MC260006, E20MC260006, E20MW260006, E21MC260006 ALN 20.507 and 20.526: All awards included on the schedule under the ALNs Pass through Entity - N/A Finding Type Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - A nonfederal entity must have adequate procedures in place to verify that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded (2 CFR sections 200.212 and 200.318(h); 2 CFR section 180.300; 48 CFR section 52.209 6). Additionally, a nonfederal entity requires a cost price analysis to be performed with every procurement action in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold (2 CFR section 200.324). Condition During procurement testing, we noted two contracts for which the City did not review sam.gov to ensure the entity was not suspended or debarred. Additionally, we noted one contract for which the City did not perform the required cost price analysis. Questioned Costs - None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - The contracts identified above was tested among a sample of 15 contracts in total, a sample of 8 for ESG and a sample of 7 for FTC. Cause and Effect - The City?s controls were not adequate to comply with suspension and debarment and cost price analysis requirements. A possible effect is that the City could be responsible for repaying costs charged to the grant if it enters into a transaction with an entity that is suspended or debarred or that the appropriate cost price analysis has not been performed. Recommendation We recommend the City implement adequate controls to ensure verification of debarment, suspension, or exclusion takes place before entering into covered transactions, and, when required, a cost price analysis is performed. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - The City will review its current procurement policy and implement additional controls as needed to help ensure verification is performed as required and the required processes are followed.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 14.231, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Emergency Solutions Grant Program, including COVID-19 ALN 20.507 and 20.526, Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Cluster, including COVID 19 Federal Award Identification Number and Year - ALN 14.231: E19MC260006, E20MC260006, E20MW260006, E21MC260006 ALN 20.507 and 20.526: All awards included on the schedule under the ALNs Pass through Entity - N/A Finding Type Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - A nonfederal entity must have adequate procedures in place to verify that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded (2 CFR sections 200.212 and 200.318(h); 2 CFR section 180.300; 48 CFR section 52.209 6). Additionally, a nonfederal entity requires a cost price analysis to be performed with every procurement action in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold (2 CFR section 200.324). Condition During procurement testing, we noted two contracts for which the City did not review sam.gov to ensure the entity was not suspended or debarred. Additionally, we noted one contract for which the City did not perform the required cost price analysis. Questioned Costs - None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - The contracts identified above was tested among a sample of 15 contracts in total, a sample of 8 for ESG and a sample of 7 for FTC. Cause and Effect - The City?s controls were not adequate to comply with suspension and debarment and cost price analysis requirements. A possible effect is that the City could be responsible for repaying costs charged to the grant if it enters into a transaction with an entity that is suspended or debarred or that the appropriate cost price analysis has not been performed. Recommendation We recommend the City implement adequate controls to ensure verification of debarment, suspension, or exclusion takes place before entering into covered transactions, and, when required, a cost price analysis is performed. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - The City will review its current procurement policy and implement additional controls as needed to help ensure verification is performed as required and the required processes are followed.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 14.231, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Emergency Solutions Grant Program, including COVID-19 ALN 20.507 and 20.526, Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Cluster, including COVID 19 Federal Award Identification Number and Year - ALN 14.231: E19MC260006, E20MC260006, E20MW260006, E21MC260006 ALN 20.507 and 20.526: All awards included on the schedule under the ALNs Pass through Entity - N/A Finding Type Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - A nonfederal entity must have adequate procedures in place to verify that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded (2 CFR sections 200.212 and 200.318(h); 2 CFR section 180.300; 48 CFR section 52.209 6). Additionally, a nonfederal entity requires a cost price analysis to be performed with every procurement action in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold (2 CFR section 200.324). Condition During procurement testing, we noted two contracts for which the City did not review sam.gov to ensure the entity was not suspended or debarred. Additionally, we noted one contract for which the City did not perform the required cost price analysis. Questioned Costs - None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - The contracts identified above was tested among a sample of 15 contracts in total, a sample of 8 for ESG and a sample of 7 for FTC. Cause and Effect - The City?s controls were not adequate to comply with suspension and debarment and cost price analysis requirements. A possible effect is that the City could be responsible for repaying costs charged to the grant if it enters into a transaction with an entity that is suspended or debarred or that the appropriate cost price analysis has not been performed. Recommendation We recommend the City implement adequate controls to ensure verification of debarment, suspension, or exclusion takes place before entering into covered transactions, and, when required, a cost price analysis is performed. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - The City will review its current procurement policy and implement additional controls as needed to help ensure verification is performed as required and the required processes are followed.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 14.231, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Emergency Solutions Grant Program, including COVID-19 ALN 20.507 and 20.526, Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Cluster, including COVID 19 Federal Award Identification Number and Year - ALN 14.231: E19MC260006, E20MC260006, E20MW260006, E21MC260006 ALN 20.507 and 20.526: All awards included on the schedule under the ALNs Pass through Entity - N/A Finding Type Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - A nonfederal entity must have adequate procedures in place to verify that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded (2 CFR sections 200.212 and 200.318(h); 2 CFR section 180.300; 48 CFR section 52.209 6). Additionally, a nonfederal entity requires a cost price analysis to be performed with every procurement action in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold (2 CFR section 200.324). Condition During procurement testing, we noted two contracts for which the City did not review sam.gov to ensure the entity was not suspended or debarred. Additionally, we noted one contract for which the City did not perform the required cost price analysis. Questioned Costs - None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - The contracts identified above was tested among a sample of 15 contracts in total, a sample of 8 for ESG and a sample of 7 for FTC. Cause and Effect - The City?s controls were not adequate to comply with suspension and debarment and cost price analysis requirements. A possible effect is that the City could be responsible for repaying costs charged to the grant if it enters into a transaction with an entity that is suspended or debarred or that the appropriate cost price analysis has not been performed. Recommendation We recommend the City implement adequate controls to ensure verification of debarment, suspension, or exclusion takes place before entering into covered transactions, and, when required, a cost price analysis is performed. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - The City will review its current procurement policy and implement additional controls as needed to help ensure verification is performed as required and the required processes are followed.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 14.231, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Emergency Solutions Grant Program, including COVID-19 ALN 20.507 and 20.526, Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Cluster, including COVID 19 Federal Award Identification Number and Year - ALN 14.231: E19MC260006, E20MC260006, E20MW260006, E21MC260006 ALN 20.507 and 20.526: All awards included on the schedule under the ALNs Pass through Entity - N/A Finding Type Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - A nonfederal entity must have adequate procedures in place to verify that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded (2 CFR sections 200.212 and 200.318(h); 2 CFR section 180.300; 48 CFR section 52.209 6). Additionally, a nonfederal entity requires a cost price analysis to be performed with every procurement action in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold (2 CFR section 200.324). Condition During procurement testing, we noted two contracts for which the City did not review sam.gov to ensure the entity was not suspended or debarred. Additionally, we noted one contract for which the City did not perform the required cost price analysis. Questioned Costs - None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - The contracts identified above was tested among a sample of 15 contracts in total, a sample of 8 for ESG and a sample of 7 for FTC. Cause and Effect - The City?s controls were not adequate to comply with suspension and debarment and cost price analysis requirements. A possible effect is that the City could be responsible for repaying costs charged to the grant if it enters into a transaction with an entity that is suspended or debarred or that the appropriate cost price analysis has not been performed. Recommendation We recommend the City implement adequate controls to ensure verification of debarment, suspension, or exclusion takes place before entering into covered transactions, and, when required, a cost price analysis is performed. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - The City will review its current procurement policy and implement additional controls as needed to help ensure verification is performed as required and the required processes are followed.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 14.231, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Emergency Solutions Grant Program, including COVID-19 ALN 20.507 and 20.526, Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Cluster, including COVID 19 Federal Award Identification Number and Year - ALN 14.231: E19MC260006, E20MC260006, E20MW260006, E21MC260006 ALN 20.507 and 20.526: All awards included on the schedule under the ALNs Pass through Entity - N/A Finding Type Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - A nonfederal entity must have adequate procedures in place to verify that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded (2 CFR sections 200.212 and 200.318(h); 2 CFR section 180.300; 48 CFR section 52.209 6). Additionally, a nonfederal entity requires a cost price analysis to be performed with every procurement action in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold (2 CFR section 200.324). Condition During procurement testing, we noted two contracts for which the City did not review sam.gov to ensure the entity was not suspended or debarred. Additionally, we noted one contract for which the City did not perform the required cost price analysis. Questioned Costs - None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - The contracts identified above was tested among a sample of 15 contracts in total, a sample of 8 for ESG and a sample of 7 for FTC. Cause and Effect - The City?s controls were not adequate to comply with suspension and debarment and cost price analysis requirements. A possible effect is that the City could be responsible for repaying costs charged to the grant if it enters into a transaction with an entity that is suspended or debarred or that the appropriate cost price analysis has not been performed. Recommendation We recommend the City implement adequate controls to ensure verification of debarment, suspension, or exclusion takes place before entering into covered transactions, and, when required, a cost price analysis is performed. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - The City will review its current procurement policy and implement additional controls as needed to help ensure verification is performed as required and the required processes are followed.