FINDING 2022-005 Subject: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds - Procurement Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Federal Program: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listings Number: 21.027 Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): FY 2022 Pass-Through Entity: Department of the Treasury Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context The City had not properly designed or implemented a system of internal controls, which would include appropriate segregation of duties, that would likely be effective in preventing, or detecting and correcting, noncompliance. Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is customarily set at $250,000. However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold of $150,000 or less for when small purchase procedures may be used. Indiana Code provides that the proper purchasing method would be the bidding process, unless the purchase meets certain other qualifications. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 22 CITY OF MUNCIE SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Six vendors fell within the simplified acquisition threshold. All six vendors were selected for testing. For three of the vendors tested, there were no requests for proposals received and no documentation to support the history of the procurement, including the rationale for the method of procurement, nor selection of the contract. In addition, there was no documentation that a cost or price analysis was performed for the three contracts. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318 states in part: "(a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. . . . (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. . . ." 2 CFR 200.324(a) states: "The non-Federal entity must perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold including contract modifications. The method and degree of analysis is dependent on the facts surrounding the particular procurement situation, but as a starting point, the non-Federal entity must make independent estimates before receiving bids or proposals." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use document procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. . . . INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 23 CITY OF MUNCIE SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (b) Formal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal financial assistance award exceeds the SAT, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require following documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a non-competitive procurement can be used in accordance with § 200.319 or paragraph (c) of this section. The following formal methods of procurement are used for procurement of property or services above the simplified acquisition threshold or a value below the simplified acquisition threshold the non-Federal entity determines to be appropriate: (1) Sealed bids. A procurement method in which bids are publicly solicited and a firm fixed-price contract (lump sum or unit price) is awarded to the responsible bidder whose bid, conforming with all the material terms and conditions of the invitation for bids, is the lowest in price. The sealed bids method is the preferred method for procuring construction, if the conditions. (i) In order for sealed bidding to be feasible, the following conditions should be present: (A) A complete, adequate, and realistic specification or purchase description is available; (B) Two or more responsible bidders are willing and able to compete effectively for the business; and (C) The procurement lends itself to a firm fixed price contract and the selection of the successful bidder can be made principally on the basis of price. (ii) If sealed bids are used, the following requirements apply: (A) Bids must be solicited from an adequate number of qualified sources, providing them sufficient response time prior to the date set for opening the bids, for local, and tribal governments, the invitation for bids must be publicly advertised; (B) The invitation for bids, which will include any specifications and pertinent attachments, must define the items or services in order for the bidder to properly respond; (C) All bids will be opened at the time and place prescribed in the invitation for bids, and for local and tribal governments, the bids must be opened publicly; (D) A firm fixed price contract award will be made in writing to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder. Where specified in bidding documents, factors such as discounts, transportation cost, and life cycle costs must be considered in determining which bid is lowest. Payment discounts will only be used to determine the low bid when prior experience indicates that such discounts are usually taken advantage of; and (E) Any or all bids may be rejected if there is a sound documented reason. . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 24 CITY OF MUNCIE SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Cause The system of internal controls as established by the City was not properly implemented to ensure that goods and services that exceeded the simplified acquisition threshold were properly procured. A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the City. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the City's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, proper procurement procedures were not adhered to for all vendors. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the City establish a proper system of internal controls, and develop policies and procedures to ensure proper procurement procedures are adhered to for all purchases of good and services paid with federal awards. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.324 notes, ?The non-Federal entity must perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold including contract modifications. The method and degree of analysis is dependent on the facts surrounding the particular procurement situation, but as a starting point, the non-Federal entity must make independent estimates before receiving bids or proposals.? Condition: For one of six (16.7%) procurements selected for testing exceeded the Simplified Acquisition Threshold ($250,000) and a cost or price analysis was not performed. We consider this to be an instance of noncompliance relating to the Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment compliance requirement. Statistical sampling was not used in making sample selections. Questioned Costs: N/A. Cause and Effect: Without cost or price analyses being performed, the Organization may overspend on products or services when compared to other vendors and the environment. Recommendation: We recommend the evaluation policies and procedures to ensure all procurement requirements are followed. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with this Single Audit Finding and response is included in the Corrective Action Plan.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.324 notes, ?The non-Federal entity must perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold including contract modifications. The method and degree of analysis is dependent on the facts surrounding the particular procurement situation, but as a starting point, the non-Federal entity must make independent estimates before receiving bids or proposals.? Condition: For one of six (16.7%) procurements selected for testing exceeded the Simplified Acquisition Threshold ($250,000) and a cost or price analysis was not performed. We consider this to be an instance of noncompliance relating to the Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment compliance requirement. Statistical sampling was not used in making sample selections. Questioned Costs: N/A. Cause and Effect: Without cost or price analyses being performed, the Organization may overspend on products or services when compared to other vendors and the environment. Recommendation: We recommend the evaluation policies and procedures to ensure all procurement requirements are followed. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with this Single Audit Finding and response is included in the Corrective Action Plan.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.324 notes, ?The non-Federal entity must perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold including contract modifications. The method and degree of analysis is dependent on the facts surrounding the particular procurement situation, but as a starting point, the non-Federal entity must make independent estimates before receiving bids or proposals.? Condition: For one of six (16.7%) procurements selected for testing exceeded the Simplified Acquisition Threshold ($250,000) and a cost or price analysis was not performed. We consider this to be an instance of noncompliance relating to the Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment compliance requirement. Statistical sampling was not used in making sample selections. Questioned Costs: N/A. Cause and Effect: Without cost or price analyses being performed, the Organization may overspend on products or services when compared to other vendors and the environment. Recommendation: We recommend the evaluation policies and procedures to ensure all procurement requirements are followed. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with this Single Audit Finding and response is included in the Corrective Action Plan.
CONDITION: The City of McKeesport contracted with a third-party vendor (A&H Equipment for the purchase of a street sweeper. The contract with the third-party vendor, which was procured through a cooperative purchasing group (COSTARS), exceeded the threshold for competitive procurement. The City was unable to provide documentation to verify that the third-party procurement contract was competitively procured, such as a bid evaluation and public solicitation. In addition, the City did not conduct a cost or price analysis for this procurement, which was in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold of $250,000. CRITERIA: Section 2 CFR 200.318(i) of the Uniform Guidance prescribes the bidding requirements for equipment, supplies, and work of any nature made by a non-federal entity whereby the cost exceeds the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. The cost of the street sweeper exceeded the simplified acquisition threshold of $250,000. As specified in 2 CFR 200. 318(i) of the Uniform Guidance, the City must maintain sufficient records to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. In addition, Section 2 CFR 200.324(a) of the Uniform Guidance requires the performance of a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. CAUSE: City personnel directly responsible for the oversight and execution of these procurements were not fully familiar with the procurement requirements as prescribed by Sections 2 CFR 200.318(i) and 2 CFR 200.324(a) of the Uniform Guidance. EFFECT: The City of McKeesport did not comply with the requirements of Sections 2 CFR 200.318(i) and 2 CFR 200.324(a) of the Uniform Guidance with regard to maintaining sufficient records to detail the history of procurement for the construction project and conducting a cost or price analysis for a procurement in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. QUESTIONED COST: $268,975 RECOMMENDATION: I am recommending that City management implement, review and update annually as necessary, City federal financial policies and procedures, similar to those developed for use in the City’s Community Development Program to ensure In instances where the procurement cost incurred for goods and/or services exceeds the Uniform Guidance Simplified Acquisition, including such instances whereby the City is using a contract vehicle from a cooperative purchase network, that the City is in compliance with all applicable sections of the Uniform Guidance, in specific, Section 2 CFR 200.318(i) of the Uniform Guidance. In addition, I recommend that the City conduct a cost or price analysis for all procurement in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold of $250,000 before receiving bids or proposals in accordance with Section 2 CFR 200.324(a) of the Uniform Guidance. VIEWS OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS: The City concurs with the above noted finding and addresses this issue in the ‘Corrective Action Plan’ included within this report.
2022 – 003 Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: U.S. Department Treasury Federal Program Name: Coronavirus State & Local Fiscal Recovery Fund Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: SLFRP3738 11/30/2021 Award Period: March 3, 2021 through December 31, 2024 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matter Criteria or specific requirement: Uniform Grant Guidance (2 CFR 200.318, 2 CFR 200.319, 2 CFR 200.324, 2 CFR 180.220, and 2 CFR 200.320,) requires a non-federal entity to maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement, the providing of full and open competition, the performing of cost or price analysis, and prohibits the non-federal entity to contract or make subawards to parties that are suspended or debarred (covered transactions over $25,000). These records will include the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, the basis for the contract price, how full and open competition was provided, the cost or price analysis performed, and verification the vendor is not suspended or debarred through the SAMs exclusion list, collecting of certification from the entity, or by adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with the entity. Procurement methods used must be appropriate based on the dollar amount and conditions specified. Condition: Procurement methods for certain federal award purchases were not adequately documented or appropriately selected in accordance with the County’s procurement policy. In addition, the County did not maintain records the vendor was not suspended or debarred prior to entering into the transactions. Questioned costs: Unknown Context: 3 of 6 tested for procurement documentation and 5 of 5 tested for suspension and debarment documentation. Cause: With new federal funding opportunities due to the pandemic, and new guidance related to those grants, proper documentation was not retained. Effect: May result in a disallowed cost if grant requirements are not followed. Repeat Finding: This is a repeat finding. Prior year finding numbers were 2021-004 and 2021-005. Recommendation: We recommend the County carefully review federal procurement requirements for proper documentation needed. The County should consider use of a Federal procurement checklist. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Federal Program Name: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: 1505-0271; 2021 Award Period: March 3, 2021 through December 31, 2024 Type of Finding: ? Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance ? Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Uniform Grant Guidance (2 CFR 200.318, 2 CFR 200.319, 2 CFR 200.324 and 2 CFR 180.220) requires a non-federal entity to maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement, the providing of full and open competition, the performing of cost or price analysis, and prohibits the non-federal entity to contract or make subawards to parties that are suspended or debarred. These records will include the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, the basis for the contract price, how full and open competition was provided, the cost or price analysis performed, and verification the vendor is not suspended or debarred through the SAMs exclusion list, collecting of certification from the entity, or by adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with the entity. Condition: Procurement methods for certain federal award purchases were not adequately documented and the County did not verify the vendor was not suspended or debarred prior to entering into the transactions. Questioned costs: None Context: 3 of 5 tested for procurement documentation and 6 of 6 tested for suspension and debarment documentation. Cause: Lack of documentation retained over procurement rationale or cost analysis and lack of knowledge on suspension and debarment policy. Effect: Purchases are not properly documented to meet the Federal procurement requirements. CLA was able to determine the vendors were not suspended or debarred. Repeat Finding: This finding is a repeat of a finding in the prior year on a different program. Prior year finding number was 2021-003. Recommendation: We recommend the County carefully review federal procurement requirements for proper documentation needed. The County should consider use of a Federal procurement checklist. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2022 – 003 Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: U.S. Department Treasury Federal Program Name: Coronavirus State & Local Fiscal Recovery Fund Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: SLFRP3738 11/30/2021 Award Period: March 3, 2021 through December 31, 2024 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matter Criteria or specific requirement: Uniform Grant Guidance (2 CFR 200.318, 2 CFR 200.319, 2 CFR 200.324, 2 CFR 180.220, and 2 CFR 200.320,) requires a non-federal entity to maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement, the providing of full and open competition, the performing of cost or price analysis, and prohibits the non-federal entity to contract or make subawards to parties that are suspended or debarred (covered transactions over $25,000). These records will include the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, the basis for the contract price, how full and open competition was provided, the cost or price analysis performed, and verification the vendor is not suspended or debarred through the SAMs exclusion list, collecting of certification from the entity, or by adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with the entity. Procurement methods used must be appropriate based on the dollar amount and conditions specified. Condition: Procurement methods for certain federal award purchases were not adequately documented or appropriately selected in accordance with the County’s procurement policy. In addition, the County did not maintain records the vendor was not suspended or debarred prior to entering into the transactions. Questioned costs: Unknown Context: 3 of 6 tested for procurement documentation and 5 of 5 tested for suspension and debarment documentation. Cause: With new federal funding opportunities due to the pandemic, and new guidance related to those grants, proper documentation was not retained. Effect: May result in a disallowed cost if grant requirements are not followed. Repeat Finding: This is a repeat finding. Prior year finding numbers were 2021-004 and 2021-005. Recommendation: We recommend the County carefully review federal procurement requirements for proper documentation needed. The County should consider use of a Federal procurement checklist. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Federal Program Name: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: 1505-0271; 2021 Award Period: March 3, 2021 through December 31, 2024 Type of Finding: ? Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance ? Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Uniform Grant Guidance (2 CFR 200.318, 2 CFR 200.319, 2 CFR 200.324 and 2 CFR 180.220) requires a non-federal entity to maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement, the providing of full and open competition, the performing of cost or price analysis, and prohibits the non-federal entity to contract or make subawards to parties that are suspended or debarred. These records will include the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, the basis for the contract price, how full and open competition was provided, the cost or price analysis performed, and verification the vendor is not suspended or debarred through the SAMs exclusion list, collecting of certification from the entity, or by adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with the entity. Condition: Procurement methods for certain federal award purchases were not adequately documented and the County did not verify the vendor was not suspended or debarred prior to entering into the transactions. Questioned costs: None Context: 3 of 5 tested for procurement documentation and 6 of 6 tested for suspension and debarment documentation. Cause: Lack of documentation retained over procurement rationale or cost analysis and lack of knowledge on suspension and debarment policy. Effect: Purchases are not properly documented to meet the Federal procurement requirements. CLA was able to determine the vendors were not suspended or debarred. Repeat Finding: This finding is a repeat of a finding in the prior year on a different program. Prior year finding number was 2021-003. Recommendation: We recommend the County carefully review federal procurement requirements for proper documentation needed. The County should consider use of a Federal procurement checklist. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2022-002—Unallowable Gift Card Disbursements Charged to Federal Program Type of Finding: (F) Instance of Noncompliance Related to Federal Awards Funding Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services AL #: 93.231 – COVID-19: Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity Award #: Various Award Period: 09/30/2021 – 09/29/2026 Estimated Questioned Costs: $15,300 Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Statement of Condition AAIHB distributed gift cards to both salaried employees and independent contractors as a gesture of appreciation for working extended hours related to COVID-19 contact tracing efforts. The total value of the gift cards was approximately $15,300 and was charged to the COVID-19: Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity grant (AL #93.231). For contractors, these gift cards were provided in addition to their regular compensation. The gift card disbursements were not processed through payroll nor formalized in contract terms, and there is no documentation indicating the entity obtained approval from the awarding agency. Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR § 200.403, costs charged to federal awards must be necessary, reasonable, allocable, and conform to limitations set forth in federal regulations. Per 2 CFR § 200.421(e)(3), the cost of gifts—including cash or cash equivalents such as gift cards—is generally unallowable. Compensation for employees must comply with 2 CFR § 200.430, including support through written policies and documentation of time and effort. Contractor payments must align with procurement standards in 2 CFR § 200.318–200.324 and be governed by written contracts. Effect The use of federal funds to provide gift cards constitutes an unallowable cost under Uniform Guidance. The questioned amount may be subject to repayment to the awarding agency or passthrough entity. Cause The auditee sought to recognize the extraordinary efforts of personnel during the COVID-19 public health response. However, they were unaware that the use of gift cards for this purpose was inconsistent with Uniform Guidance and lacked prior approval or supporting policy. Recommendation We recommend the auditee discontinue the use of federal funds for gift card distributions. All compensation for employees should be processed through payroll, supported by appropriate documentation and internal policies. Payments to contractors should be governed by written contracts and comply with applicable procurement standards. If the auditee believes these costs are justifiable, they should consult the awarding agency for a determination and, if necessary, reimburse the federal award.
2022-002—Unallowable Gift Card Disbursements Charged to Federal Program Type of Finding: (F) Instance of Noncompliance Related to Federal Awards Funding Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services AL #: 93.231 – COVID-19: Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity Award #: Various Award Period: 09/30/2021 – 09/29/2026 Estimated Questioned Costs: $15,300 Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Statement of Condition AAIHB distributed gift cards to both salaried employees and independent contractors as a gesture of appreciation for working extended hours related to COVID-19 contact tracing efforts. The total value of the gift cards was approximately $15,300 and was charged to the COVID-19: Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity grant (AL #93.231). For contractors, these gift cards were provided in addition to their regular compensation. The gift card disbursements were not processed through payroll nor formalized in contract terms, and there is no documentation indicating the entity obtained approval from the awarding agency. Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR § 200.403, costs charged to federal awards must be necessary, reasonable, allocable, and conform to limitations set forth in federal regulations. Per 2 CFR § 200.421(e)(3), the cost of gifts—including cash or cash equivalents such as gift cards—is generally unallowable. Compensation for employees must comply with 2 CFR § 200.430, including support through written policies and documentation of time and effort. Contractor payments must align with procurement standards in 2 CFR § 200.318–200.324 and be governed by written contracts. Effect The use of federal funds to provide gift cards constitutes an unallowable cost under Uniform Guidance. The questioned amount may be subject to repayment to the awarding agency or passthrough entity. Cause The auditee sought to recognize the extraordinary efforts of personnel during the COVID-19 public health response. However, they were unaware that the use of gift cards for this purpose was inconsistent with Uniform Guidance and lacked prior approval or supporting policy. Recommendation We recommend the auditee discontinue the use of federal funds for gift card distributions. All compensation for employees should be processed through payroll, supported by appropriate documentation and internal policies. Payments to contractors should be governed by written contracts and comply with applicable procurement standards. If the auditee believes these costs are justifiable, they should consult the awarding agency for a determination and, if necessary, reimburse the federal award.
2022-002—Unallowable Gift Card Disbursements Charged to Federal Program Type of Finding: (F) Instance of Noncompliance Related to Federal Awards Funding Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services AL #: 93.231 – COVID-19: Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity Award #: Various Award Period: 09/30/2021 – 09/29/2026 Estimated Questioned Costs: $15,300 Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Statement of Condition AAIHB distributed gift cards to both salaried employees and independent contractors as a gesture of appreciation for working extended hours related to COVID-19 contact tracing efforts. The total value of the gift cards was approximately $15,300 and was charged to the COVID-19: Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity grant (AL #93.231). For contractors, these gift cards were provided in addition to their regular compensation. The gift card disbursements were not processed through payroll nor formalized in contract terms, and there is no documentation indicating the entity obtained approval from the awarding agency. Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR § 200.403, costs charged to federal awards must be necessary, reasonable, allocable, and conform to limitations set forth in federal regulations. Per 2 CFR § 200.421(e)(3), the cost of gifts—including cash or cash equivalents such as gift cards—is generally unallowable. Compensation for employees must comply with 2 CFR § 200.430, including support through written policies and documentation of time and effort. Contractor payments must align with procurement standards in 2 CFR § 200.318–200.324 and be governed by written contracts. Effect The use of federal funds to provide gift cards constitutes an unallowable cost under Uniform Guidance. The questioned amount may be subject to repayment to the awarding agency or passthrough entity. Cause The auditee sought to recognize the extraordinary efforts of personnel during the COVID-19 public health response. However, they were unaware that the use of gift cards for this purpose was inconsistent with Uniform Guidance and lacked prior approval or supporting policy. Recommendation We recommend the auditee discontinue the use of federal funds for gift card distributions. All compensation for employees should be processed through payroll, supported by appropriate documentation and internal policies. Payments to contractors should be governed by written contracts and comply with applicable procurement standards. If the auditee believes these costs are justifiable, they should consult the awarding agency for a determination and, if necessary, reimburse the federal award.
2022-002—Unallowable Gift Card Disbursements Charged to Federal Program Type of Finding: (F) Instance of Noncompliance Related to Federal Awards Funding Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services AL #: 93.231 – COVID-19: Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity Award #: Various Award Period: 09/30/2021 – 09/29/2026 Estimated Questioned Costs: $15,300 Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Statement of Condition AAIHB distributed gift cards to both salaried employees and independent contractors as a gesture of appreciation for working extended hours related to COVID-19 contact tracing efforts. The total value of the gift cards was approximately $15,300 and was charged to the COVID-19: Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity grant (AL #93.231). For contractors, these gift cards were provided in addition to their regular compensation. The gift card disbursements were not processed through payroll nor formalized in contract terms, and there is no documentation indicating the entity obtained approval from the awarding agency. Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR § 200.403, costs charged to federal awards must be necessary, reasonable, allocable, and conform to limitations set forth in federal regulations. Per 2 CFR § 200.421(e)(3), the cost of gifts—including cash or cash equivalents such as gift cards—is generally unallowable. Compensation for employees must comply with 2 CFR § 200.430, including support through written policies and documentation of time and effort. Contractor payments must align with procurement standards in 2 CFR § 200.318–200.324 and be governed by written contracts. Effect The use of federal funds to provide gift cards constitutes an unallowable cost under Uniform Guidance. The questioned amount may be subject to repayment to the awarding agency or passthrough entity. Cause The auditee sought to recognize the extraordinary efforts of personnel during the COVID-19 public health response. However, they were unaware that the use of gift cards for this purpose was inconsistent with Uniform Guidance and lacked prior approval or supporting policy. Recommendation We recommend the auditee discontinue the use of federal funds for gift card distributions. All compensation for employees should be processed through payroll, supported by appropriate documentation and internal policies. Payments to contractors should be governed by written contracts and comply with applicable procurement standards. If the auditee believes these costs are justifiable, they should consult the awarding agency for a determination and, if necessary, reimburse the federal award.
2022-002—Unallowable Gift Card Disbursements Charged to Federal Program Type of Finding: (F) Instance of Noncompliance Related to Federal Awards Funding Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services AL #: 93.231 – COVID-19: Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity Award #: Various Award Period: 09/30/2021 – 09/29/2026 Estimated Questioned Costs: $15,300 Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Statement of Condition AAIHB distributed gift cards to both salaried employees and independent contractors as a gesture of appreciation for working extended hours related to COVID-19 contact tracing efforts. The total value of the gift cards was approximately $15,300 and was charged to the COVID-19: Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity grant (AL #93.231). For contractors, these gift cards were provided in addition to their regular compensation. The gift card disbursements were not processed through payroll nor formalized in contract terms, and there is no documentation indicating the entity obtained approval from the awarding agency. Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR § 200.403, costs charged to federal awards must be necessary, reasonable, allocable, and conform to limitations set forth in federal regulations. Per 2 CFR § 200.421(e)(3), the cost of gifts—including cash or cash equivalents such as gift cards—is generally unallowable. Compensation for employees must comply with 2 CFR § 200.430, including support through written policies and documentation of time and effort. Contractor payments must align with procurement standards in 2 CFR § 200.318–200.324 and be governed by written contracts. Effect The use of federal funds to provide gift cards constitutes an unallowable cost under Uniform Guidance. The questioned amount may be subject to repayment to the awarding agency or passthrough entity. Cause The auditee sought to recognize the extraordinary efforts of personnel during the COVID-19 public health response. However, they were unaware that the use of gift cards for this purpose was inconsistent with Uniform Guidance and lacked prior approval or supporting policy. Recommendation We recommend the auditee discontinue the use of federal funds for gift card distributions. All compensation for employees should be processed through payroll, supported by appropriate documentation and internal policies. Payments to contractors should be governed by written contracts and comply with applicable procurement standards. If the auditee believes these costs are justifiable, they should consult the awarding agency for a determination and, if necessary, reimburse the federal award.
2022-002—Unallowable Gift Card Disbursements Charged to Federal Program Type of Finding: (F) Instance of Noncompliance Related to Federal Awards Funding Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services AL #: 93.231 – COVID-19: Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity Award #: Various Award Period: 09/30/2021 – 09/29/2026 Estimated Questioned Costs: $15,300 Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Statement of Condition AAIHB distributed gift cards to both salaried employees and independent contractors as a gesture of appreciation for working extended hours related to COVID-19 contact tracing efforts. The total value of the gift cards was approximately $15,300 and was charged to the COVID-19: Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity grant (AL #93.231). For contractors, these gift cards were provided in addition to their regular compensation. The gift card disbursements were not processed through payroll nor formalized in contract terms, and there is no documentation indicating the entity obtained approval from the awarding agency. Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR § 200.403, costs charged to federal awards must be necessary, reasonable, allocable, and conform to limitations set forth in federal regulations. Per 2 CFR § 200.421(e)(3), the cost of gifts—including cash or cash equivalents such as gift cards—is generally unallowable. Compensation for employees must comply with 2 CFR § 200.430, including support through written policies and documentation of time and effort. Contractor payments must align with procurement standards in 2 CFR § 200.318–200.324 and be governed by written contracts. Effect The use of federal funds to provide gift cards constitutes an unallowable cost under Uniform Guidance. The questioned amount may be subject to repayment to the awarding agency or passthrough entity. Cause The auditee sought to recognize the extraordinary efforts of personnel during the COVID-19 public health response. However, they were unaware that the use of gift cards for this purpose was inconsistent with Uniform Guidance and lacked prior approval or supporting policy. Recommendation We recommend the auditee discontinue the use of federal funds for gift card distributions. All compensation for employees should be processed through payroll, supported by appropriate documentation and internal policies. Payments to contractors should be governed by written contracts and comply with applicable procurement standards. If the auditee believes these costs are justifiable, they should consult the awarding agency for a determination and, if necessary, reimburse the federal award.
2022-002—Unallowable Gift Card Disbursements Charged to Federal Program Type of Finding: (F) Instance of Noncompliance Related to Federal Awards Funding Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services AL #: 93.231 – COVID-19: Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity Award #: Various Award Period: 09/30/2021 – 09/29/2026 Estimated Questioned Costs: $15,300 Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Statement of Condition AAIHB distributed gift cards to both salaried employees and independent contractors as a gesture of appreciation for working extended hours related to COVID-19 contact tracing efforts. The total value of the gift cards was approximately $15,300 and was charged to the COVID-19: Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity grant (AL #93.231). For contractors, these gift cards were provided in addition to their regular compensation. The gift card disbursements were not processed through payroll nor formalized in contract terms, and there is no documentation indicating the entity obtained approval from the awarding agency. Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR § 200.403, costs charged to federal awards must be necessary, reasonable, allocable, and conform to limitations set forth in federal regulations. Per 2 CFR § 200.421(e)(3), the cost of gifts—including cash or cash equivalents such as gift cards—is generally unallowable. Compensation for employees must comply with 2 CFR § 200.430, including support through written policies and documentation of time and effort. Contractor payments must align with procurement standards in 2 CFR § 200.318–200.324 and be governed by written contracts. Effect The use of federal funds to provide gift cards constitutes an unallowable cost under Uniform Guidance. The questioned amount may be subject to repayment to the awarding agency or passthrough entity. Cause The auditee sought to recognize the extraordinary efforts of personnel during the COVID-19 public health response. However, they were unaware that the use of gift cards for this purpose was inconsistent with Uniform Guidance and lacked prior approval or supporting policy. Recommendation We recommend the auditee discontinue the use of federal funds for gift card distributions. All compensation for employees should be processed through payroll, supported by appropriate documentation and internal policies. Payments to contractors should be governed by written contracts and comply with applicable procurement standards. If the auditee believes these costs are justifiable, they should consult the awarding agency for a determination and, if necessary, reimburse the federal award.
2022-002—Unallowable Gift Card Disbursements Charged to Federal Program Type of Finding: (F) Instance of Noncompliance Related to Federal Awards Funding Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services AL #: 93.231 – COVID-19: Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity Award #: Various Award Period: 09/30/2021 – 09/29/2026 Estimated Questioned Costs: $15,300 Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Statement of Condition AAIHB distributed gift cards to both salaried employees and independent contractors as a gesture of appreciation for working extended hours related to COVID-19 contact tracing efforts. The total value of the gift cards was approximately $15,300 and was charged to the COVID-19: Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity grant (AL #93.231). For contractors, these gift cards were provided in addition to their regular compensation. The gift card disbursements were not processed through payroll nor formalized in contract terms, and there is no documentation indicating the entity obtained approval from the awarding agency. Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR § 200.403, costs charged to federal awards must be necessary, reasonable, allocable, and conform to limitations set forth in federal regulations. Per 2 CFR § 200.421(e)(3), the cost of gifts—including cash or cash equivalents such as gift cards—is generally unallowable. Compensation for employees must comply with 2 CFR § 200.430, including support through written policies and documentation of time and effort. Contractor payments must align with procurement standards in 2 CFR § 200.318–200.324 and be governed by written contracts. Effect The use of federal funds to provide gift cards constitutes an unallowable cost under Uniform Guidance. The questioned amount may be subject to repayment to the awarding agency or passthrough entity. Cause The auditee sought to recognize the extraordinary efforts of personnel during the COVID-19 public health response. However, they were unaware that the use of gift cards for this purpose was inconsistent with Uniform Guidance and lacked prior approval or supporting policy. Recommendation We recommend the auditee discontinue the use of federal funds for gift card distributions. All compensation for employees should be processed through payroll, supported by appropriate documentation and internal policies. Payments to contractors should be governed by written contracts and comply with applicable procurement standards. If the auditee believes these costs are justifiable, they should consult the awarding agency for a determination and, if necessary, reimburse the federal award.
2022-002—Unallowable Gift Card Disbursements Charged to Federal Program Type of Finding: (F) Instance of Noncompliance Related to Federal Awards Funding Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services AL #: 93.231 – COVID-19: Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity Award #: Various Award Period: 09/30/2021 – 09/29/2026 Estimated Questioned Costs: $15,300 Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Statement of Condition AAIHB distributed gift cards to both salaried employees and independent contractors as a gesture of appreciation for working extended hours related to COVID-19 contact tracing efforts. The total value of the gift cards was approximately $15,300 and was charged to the COVID-19: Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity grant (AL #93.231). For contractors, these gift cards were provided in addition to their regular compensation. The gift card disbursements were not processed through payroll nor formalized in contract terms, and there is no documentation indicating the entity obtained approval from the awarding agency. Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR § 200.403, costs charged to federal awards must be necessary, reasonable, allocable, and conform to limitations set forth in federal regulations. Per 2 CFR § 200.421(e)(3), the cost of gifts—including cash or cash equivalents such as gift cards—is generally unallowable. Compensation for employees must comply with 2 CFR § 200.430, including support through written policies and documentation of time and effort. Contractor payments must align with procurement standards in 2 CFR § 200.318–200.324 and be governed by written contracts. Effect The use of federal funds to provide gift cards constitutes an unallowable cost under Uniform Guidance. The questioned amount may be subject to repayment to the awarding agency or passthrough entity. Cause The auditee sought to recognize the extraordinary efforts of personnel during the COVID-19 public health response. However, they were unaware that the use of gift cards for this purpose was inconsistent with Uniform Guidance and lacked prior approval or supporting policy. Recommendation We recommend the auditee discontinue the use of federal funds for gift card distributions. All compensation for employees should be processed through payroll, supported by appropriate documentation and internal policies. Payments to contractors should be governed by written contracts and comply with applicable procurement standards. If the auditee believes these costs are justifiable, they should consult the awarding agency for a determination and, if necessary, reimburse the federal award.
2022-002—Unallowable Gift Card Disbursements Charged to Federal Program Type of Finding: (F) Instance of Noncompliance Related to Federal Awards Funding Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services AL #: 93.231 – COVID-19: Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity Award #: Various Award Period: 09/30/2021 – 09/29/2026 Estimated Questioned Costs: $15,300 Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Statement of Condition AAIHB distributed gift cards to both salaried employees and independent contractors as a gesture of appreciation for working extended hours related to COVID-19 contact tracing efforts. The total value of the gift cards was approximately $15,300 and was charged to the COVID-19: Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity grant (AL #93.231). For contractors, these gift cards were provided in addition to their regular compensation. The gift card disbursements were not processed through payroll nor formalized in contract terms, and there is no documentation indicating the entity obtained approval from the awarding agency. Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR § 200.403, costs charged to federal awards must be necessary, reasonable, allocable, and conform to limitations set forth in federal regulations. Per 2 CFR § 200.421(e)(3), the cost of gifts—including cash or cash equivalents such as gift cards—is generally unallowable. Compensation for employees must comply with 2 CFR § 200.430, including support through written policies and documentation of time and effort. Contractor payments must align with procurement standards in 2 CFR § 200.318–200.324 and be governed by written contracts. Effect The use of federal funds to provide gift cards constitutes an unallowable cost under Uniform Guidance. The questioned amount may be subject to repayment to the awarding agency or passthrough entity. Cause The auditee sought to recognize the extraordinary efforts of personnel during the COVID-19 public health response. However, they were unaware that the use of gift cards for this purpose was inconsistent with Uniform Guidance and lacked prior approval or supporting policy. Recommendation We recommend the auditee discontinue the use of federal funds for gift card distributions. All compensation for employees should be processed through payroll, supported by appropriate documentation and internal policies. Payments to contractors should be governed by written contracts and comply with applicable procurement standards. If the auditee believes these costs are justifiable, they should consult the awarding agency for a determination and, if necessary, reimburse the federal award.
2022-002—Unallowable Gift Card Disbursements Charged to Federal Program Type of Finding: (F) Instance of Noncompliance Related to Federal Awards Funding Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services AL #: 93.231 – COVID-19: Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity Award #: Various Award Period: 09/30/2021 – 09/29/2026 Estimated Questioned Costs: $15,300 Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Statement of Condition AAIHB distributed gift cards to both salaried employees and independent contractors as a gesture of appreciation for working extended hours related to COVID-19 contact tracing efforts. The total value of the gift cards was approximately $15,300 and was charged to the COVID-19: Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity grant (AL #93.231). For contractors, these gift cards were provided in addition to their regular compensation. The gift card disbursements were not processed through payroll nor formalized in contract terms, and there is no documentation indicating the entity obtained approval from the awarding agency. Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR § 200.403, costs charged to federal awards must be necessary, reasonable, allocable, and conform to limitations set forth in federal regulations. Per 2 CFR § 200.421(e)(3), the cost of gifts—including cash or cash equivalents such as gift cards—is generally unallowable. Compensation for employees must comply with 2 CFR § 200.430, including support through written policies and documentation of time and effort. Contractor payments must align with procurement standards in 2 CFR § 200.318–200.324 and be governed by written contracts. Effect The use of federal funds to provide gift cards constitutes an unallowable cost under Uniform Guidance. The questioned amount may be subject to repayment to the awarding agency or passthrough entity. Cause The auditee sought to recognize the extraordinary efforts of personnel during the COVID-19 public health response. However, they were unaware that the use of gift cards for this purpose was inconsistent with Uniform Guidance and lacked prior approval or supporting policy. Recommendation We recommend the auditee discontinue the use of federal funds for gift card distributions. All compensation for employees should be processed through payroll, supported by appropriate documentation and internal policies. Payments to contractors should be governed by written contracts and comply with applicable procurement standards. If the auditee believes these costs are justifiable, they should consult the awarding agency for a determination and, if necessary, reimburse the federal award.
2022-002—Unallowable Gift Card Disbursements Charged to Federal Program Type of Finding: (F) Instance of Noncompliance Related to Federal Awards Funding Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services AL #: 93.231 – COVID-19: Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity Award #: Various Award Period: 09/30/2021 – 09/29/2026 Estimated Questioned Costs: $15,300 Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Statement of Condition AAIHB distributed gift cards to both salaried employees and independent contractors as a gesture of appreciation for working extended hours related to COVID-19 contact tracing efforts. The total value of the gift cards was approximately $15,300 and was charged to the COVID-19: Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity grant (AL #93.231). For contractors, these gift cards were provided in addition to their regular compensation. The gift card disbursements were not processed through payroll nor formalized in contract terms, and there is no documentation indicating the entity obtained approval from the awarding agency. Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR § 200.403, costs charged to federal awards must be necessary, reasonable, allocable, and conform to limitations set forth in federal regulations. Per 2 CFR § 200.421(e)(3), the cost of gifts—including cash or cash equivalents such as gift cards—is generally unallowable. Compensation for employees must comply with 2 CFR § 200.430, including support through written policies and documentation of time and effort. Contractor payments must align with procurement standards in 2 CFR § 200.318–200.324 and be governed by written contracts. Effect The use of federal funds to provide gift cards constitutes an unallowable cost under Uniform Guidance. The questioned amount may be subject to repayment to the awarding agency or passthrough entity. Cause The auditee sought to recognize the extraordinary efforts of personnel during the COVID-19 public health response. However, they were unaware that the use of gift cards for this purpose was inconsistent with Uniform Guidance and lacked prior approval or supporting policy. Recommendation We recommend the auditee discontinue the use of federal funds for gift card distributions. All compensation for employees should be processed through payroll, supported by appropriate documentation and internal policies. Payments to contractors should be governed by written contracts and comply with applicable procurement standards. If the auditee believes these costs are justifiable, they should consult the awarding agency for a determination and, if necessary, reimburse the federal award.
B. FINDINGS - FINANCIAL STATEMENT AUDIT IC-2022-001: Financial Reporting (Material Weakness) Condition: Material misstatements within the financial statements were identified throughout the audit. Criteria: Management should have processes and procedures in place so as to be able to generate financial statements and reports that are complete and accurate on a timely basis and in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). Cause: The current size of the finance staffing of the County and School Board may not be sufficient to detect and prevent material errors. Effect: Financial statements and reports prepared in accordance with GAAP were not able to be generated accurately on a timely basis. Recommendation: We recommend that management re-evaluate the current staff structure and assignment of responsibilities in order to re-align roles and responsibilities with appropriate personnel or otherwise bolster their resource base so as to be able to meet the criteria. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: See Corrective Action Plan. C. FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS - MAJOR FEDERAL AWARD PROGRAM AUDIT FA-2022-001: Procurement (Material Weakness) Condition: The School Board?s written procurement policies do not include policies that cover CFR ?200.318e, ?200.318f, ?200.318i, ?200.319b, ?200.319c, ?200.319d, ?200.319e, ?200.320a1, ?200,322, ?200.324b, ?200.326 and ?200.327. Criteria: Non-federal entities must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR (Uniform Guidance) ?200.318 through ?200.327. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. Cause: The procurement policies for the School Board do not include the policies stated above, required by Uniform Guidance. Effect: The School Board?s policies do not comply with procurement requirements for federal awards (Uniform Guidance). Questioned Cost Amount: n/a Perspective Information: n/a Context: n/a Recommendation: Procurement policies should be reviewed and updated to be in compliance with the requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: See Corrective Action Plan.
Noncompliance and Material Weakness 2 CFR 3474.1 provides that the Department of Education (DOE) adopts the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Guidance in 2 CFR part 200. Thus, this section gives regulatory effect to the OMB guidance and supplements the guidance as needed for the DOE, except as otherwise noted in that section. Non-Federal entities other than States, including those operating Federal programs as subrecipients of States, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.327. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable State and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200. A nonfederal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR 200.318, which include oversight of contractors? performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR 200.320(a)(1) and (2). Under the micro-purchase method, the aggregate dollar amount does not exceed $10,000 ($2,000 in the case of acquisition for construction subject to the Wage Rate Requirements (Davis-Bacon Act)). Small purchase procedures are used for purchases that exceed the micro-purchase amount but do not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold ($250,000). Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive quotations if the non-Federal entity considers the price to be reasonable (2 CFR 200.320(a)(1)(ii)). If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources (2 CFR 200.320(a)(2)(i)). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-Federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR 200.320(b)(1); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR 200.320(b)(2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of five circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR 200.320(c). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR 200.324(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR 200.324(d)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR 200.327. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, ?Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.? Western Toledo Preparatory Academy Procurement Policy for Federal Grants indicates the following methods of procurement will be used for all purchases of goods and services made with federal funds: 1. Purchases under $2,000 require little formal documentation; they are likely to be a catalog purchase, with prices that are readily available from many vendors. A quick notation or copy of the prices checked from at least one other source should be attached to the order or noted in the file. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner that maximizes opportunities, increases quality (if a factor), and reduces cost of the purchase. 2. Purchases from $2,000 to $10,000 should have a telephone or other quotations and simple purchase or performance descriptions. Inquire in the open market to ensure an advantageous price and quality. The file should document the inquiries made and offers received from at least three sources. 3. Purchases from $10,000 to $100,000 should be treated more formally, though the acquisition procedures can still be somewhat streamlined. Consider using mini-proposals for negotiated acquisitions; more formal purchase and performance descriptions should be included, with bid responses requirements spelled out. To ensure that you have an adequate number of bidders, you may wish to advertise and devise pre-qualification procedures aimed at vendors who offer goods and services you use often. Purchases over $10,000 require grater documentation and cost allowability, need for the procurement, and the vendor selection. Request competitive quotes orally or in writing, from at least three different sources. The file shall document each invitation made and offer received. Document Prices: Maintain files on all quotations solicited and offers and bides received and any criteria for selection. In all instances in which the lowest bid is not awarded in the contract, justification for the selection must me contained in the file. Due to deficiencies in monitoring compliance over procurement, 18 percent of the procurements did not contain the required price or rate quotations. The Academy expended the following amounts without using the proper procurement method: o $30,559 was paid to a vendor for materials and installation of a projector; however, the Academy could not provide documentation to support the required price quotations were obtained from a minimum of three vendors. o $17,588 was paid to a vendor for materials and installation of a video surveillance system; however, the Academy could not provide documentation to support the required price quotations were obtained from a minimum of three vendors. Without proper controls over procurement, there is an increased risk that the Academy is not in compliance with applicable federal regulations. Noncompliance could result in federal funding being reduced or taken away, or other sanctions imposed by the federal grantor agency. The Academy should review the procurement requirements specified above and ensure the proper procurement method is used. The Academy should also maintain adequate documentation to detail the history of procurement. Officials? Response: See Corrective Action Plan
2 CFR 3474.1 provides that the Department of Education (DOE) adopts the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Guidance in 2 CFR part 200. Thus, this section gives regulatory effect to the OMB guidance and supplements the guidance as needed for the DOE, except as otherwise noted in that section. Non-Federal entities other than States, including those operating Federal programs as subrecipients of States, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.327. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable State and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200. A nonfederal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR 200.318, which include oversight of contractors? performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR 200.320(a)(1) and (2). Under the micro-purchase method, the aggregate dollar amount does not exceed $10,000 ($2,000 in the case of acquisition for construction subject to the Wage Rate Requirements (Davis-Bacon Act)). Small purchase procedures are used for purchases that exceed the micro-purchase amount but do not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold ($250,000). Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive quotations if the non-Federal entity considers the price to be reasonable (2 CFR 200.320(a)(1)(ii)). If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources (2 CFR 200.320(a)(2)(i)). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-Federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR 200.320(b)(1); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR 200.320(b)(2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of five circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR 200.320(c). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR 200.324(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR 200.324(d)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR 200.327. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, ?Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards. Black River Local School District Board Policy DJF-R ? Purchasing Procedures indicates the following methods of procurement will be used for all purchases of goods and services made with federal funds: 1. Micro-purchases are purchases up to $10,000 and may be made in accordance with District purchasing procedures when the costs are reasonable. To the extent practicable, these purchases are distributed equitably among qualified suppliers. 2. Small purchase are purchases between $10,000 and $250,000. Prior to authorizing the purchase, the District will try to obtain price rates or quotations from a minimum of three vendors or providers. The District will obtain these price rates or quotations by written quotes. 3. Sealed bid procedures are used for firm fixed price contracts over $250,000 and is used as the preferred method for construction projects. Bids are solicited from an adequate number of known suppliers, which cannot be less than two responsible bidders. The District will solicit bids by posting bids using at least one public posting source. The contract will be awarded to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder. 4. Competitive proposals are used for all purchases over $250,000 for which sealed bids are not appropriate and must be used for architectural or engineering services. Contracts entered into for competitive proposals may be fixed-price or cost reimbursement. The District will publicize a request for proposal by advertising through the local paper or using a procurement source. The District will evaluate proposals in order to award the contract to the most advantageous proposal when considering cost and other factors. The District will evaluate proposals by checklist and compare. 5. Sole source procurement is used only when the goods or services are only available from a single source; a public exigency or emergency exists; there is inadequate competition and the applicable pass through entity approves this method. Lack of proper internal controls over Federal Grants management led to the District expending the following amounts without using the proper procurement method: Education Stabilization Fund - Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER II) Fund, AL #84.425D ? $33,000 was paid to a vendor for electrical work related to a HVAC project; however, the District could not provide documentation to support the required price quotations were obtained from a minimum of three vendors. ? $350,000 was paid to a vendor for a HVAC project; however, the District could not provide documentation to support sealed bids were solicited and received, and the contract awarded to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder. ? $226,752 was paid to a vendor for a HVAC project; however, the District could not provide documentation to support the required price quotations were obtained from a minimum of three vendors. Education Stabilization Fund - American Rescue Plan Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ARP ESSER) Fund, AL #84.425U ? $1,898,392 was paid to a vendor for the design and build of kindergarten and high school classrooms; however, the District could not provide documentation to support sealed bids were solicited and received and the contract awarded to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder. Without proper controls over procurement, there is an increased risk that the District is not in compliance with applicable federal regulations. Noncompliance could result in federal funding being reduced or taken away, or other sanctions imposed by the federal grantor agency. The District should review the procurement requirements specified above and ensure the proper procurement method is used. The District should also maintain adequate documentation to detail the history of procurement.
2 CFR 3474.1 provides that the Department of Education (DOE) adopts the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Guidance in 2 CFR part 200. Thus, this section gives regulatory effect to the OMB guidance and supplements the guidance as needed for the DOE, except as otherwise noted in that section. Non-Federal entities other than States, including those operating Federal programs as subrecipients of States, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.327. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable State and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200. A nonfederal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR 200.318, which include oversight of contractors? performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR 200.320(a)(1) and (2). Under the micro-purchase method, the aggregate dollar amount does not exceed $10,000 ($2,000 in the case of acquisition for construction subject to the Wage Rate Requirements (Davis-Bacon Act)). Small purchase procedures are used for purchases that exceed the micro-purchase amount but do not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold ($250,000). Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive quotations if the non-Federal entity considers the price to be reasonable (2 CFR 200.320(a)(1)(ii)). If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources (2 CFR 200.320(a)(2)(i)). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-Federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR 200.320(b)(1); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR 200.320(b)(2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of five circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR 200.320(c). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR 200.324(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR 200.324(d)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR 200.327. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, ?Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards. Black River Local School District Board Policy DJF-R ? Purchasing Procedures indicates the following methods of procurement will be used for all purchases of goods and services made with federal funds: 1. Micro-purchases are purchases up to $10,000 and may be made in accordance with District purchasing procedures when the costs are reasonable. To the extent practicable, these purchases are distributed equitably among qualified suppliers. 2. Small purchase are purchases between $10,000 and $250,000. Prior to authorizing the purchase, the District will try to obtain price rates or quotations from a minimum of three vendors or providers. The District will obtain these price rates or quotations by written quotes. 3. Sealed bid procedures are used for firm fixed price contracts over $250,000 and is used as the preferred method for construction projects. Bids are solicited from an adequate number of known suppliers, which cannot be less than two responsible bidders. The District will solicit bids by posting bids using at least one public posting source. The contract will be awarded to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder. 4. Competitive proposals are used for all purchases over $250,000 for which sealed bids are not appropriate and must be used for architectural or engineering services. Contracts entered into for competitive proposals may be fixed-price or cost reimbursement. The District will publicize a request for proposal by advertising through the local paper or using a procurement source. The District will evaluate proposals in order to award the contract to the most advantageous proposal when considering cost and other factors. The District will evaluate proposals by checklist and compare. 5. Sole source procurement is used only when the goods or services are only available from a single source; a public exigency or emergency exists; there is inadequate competition and the applicable pass through entity approves this method. Lack of proper internal controls over Federal Grants management led to the District expending the following amounts without using the proper procurement method: Education Stabilization Fund - Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER II) Fund, AL #84.425D ? $33,000 was paid to a vendor for electrical work related to a HVAC project; however, the District could not provide documentation to support the required price quotations were obtained from a minimum of three vendors. ? $350,000 was paid to a vendor for a HVAC project; however, the District could not provide documentation to support sealed bids were solicited and received, and the contract awarded to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder. ? $226,752 was paid to a vendor for a HVAC project; however, the District could not provide documentation to support the required price quotations were obtained from a minimum of three vendors. Education Stabilization Fund - American Rescue Plan Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ARP ESSER) Fund, AL #84.425U ? $1,898,392 was paid to a vendor for the design and build of kindergarten and high school classrooms; however, the District could not provide documentation to support sealed bids were solicited and received and the contract awarded to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder. Without proper controls over procurement, there is an increased risk that the District is not in compliance with applicable federal regulations. Noncompliance could result in federal funding being reduced or taken away, or other sanctions imposed by the federal grantor agency. The District should review the procurement requirements specified above and ensure the proper procurement method is used. The District should also maintain adequate documentation to detail the history of procurement.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 14.231, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Emergency Solutions Grant Program, including COVID-19 ALN 20.507 and 20.526, Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Cluster, including COVID 19 Federal Award Identification Number and Year - ALN 14.231: E19MC260006, E20MC260006, E20MW260006, E21MC260006 ALN 20.507 and 20.526: All awards included on the schedule under the ALNs Pass through Entity - N/A Finding Type Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - A nonfederal entity must have adequate procedures in place to verify that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded (2 CFR sections 200.212 and 200.318(h); 2 CFR section 180.300; 48 CFR section 52.209 6). Additionally, a nonfederal entity requires a cost price analysis to be performed with every procurement action in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold (2 CFR section 200.324). Condition During procurement testing, we noted two contracts for which the City did not review sam.gov to ensure the entity was not suspended or debarred. Additionally, we noted one contract for which the City did not perform the required cost price analysis. Questioned Costs - None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - The contracts identified above was tested among a sample of 15 contracts in total, a sample of 8 for ESG and a sample of 7 for FTC. Cause and Effect - The City?s controls were not adequate to comply with suspension and debarment and cost price analysis requirements. A possible effect is that the City could be responsible for repaying costs charged to the grant if it enters into a transaction with an entity that is suspended or debarred or that the appropriate cost price analysis has not been performed. Recommendation We recommend the City implement adequate controls to ensure verification of debarment, suspension, or exclusion takes place before entering into covered transactions, and, when required, a cost price analysis is performed. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - The City will review its current procurement policy and implement additional controls as needed to help ensure verification is performed as required and the required processes are followed.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 14.231, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Emergency Solutions Grant Program, including COVID-19 ALN 20.507 and 20.526, Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Cluster, including COVID 19 Federal Award Identification Number and Year - ALN 14.231: E19MC260006, E20MC260006, E20MW260006, E21MC260006 ALN 20.507 and 20.526: All awards included on the schedule under the ALNs Pass through Entity - N/A Finding Type Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - A nonfederal entity must have adequate procedures in place to verify that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded (2 CFR sections 200.212 and 200.318(h); 2 CFR section 180.300; 48 CFR section 52.209 6). Additionally, a nonfederal entity requires a cost price analysis to be performed with every procurement action in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold (2 CFR section 200.324). Condition During procurement testing, we noted two contracts for which the City did not review sam.gov to ensure the entity was not suspended or debarred. Additionally, we noted one contract for which the City did not perform the required cost price analysis. Questioned Costs - None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - The contracts identified above was tested among a sample of 15 contracts in total, a sample of 8 for ESG and a sample of 7 for FTC. Cause and Effect - The City?s controls were not adequate to comply with suspension and debarment and cost price analysis requirements. A possible effect is that the City could be responsible for repaying costs charged to the grant if it enters into a transaction with an entity that is suspended or debarred or that the appropriate cost price analysis has not been performed. Recommendation We recommend the City implement adequate controls to ensure verification of debarment, suspension, or exclusion takes place before entering into covered transactions, and, when required, a cost price analysis is performed. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - The City will review its current procurement policy and implement additional controls as needed to help ensure verification is performed as required and the required processes are followed.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 14.231, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Emergency Solutions Grant Program, including COVID-19 ALN 20.507 and 20.526, Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Cluster, including COVID 19 Federal Award Identification Number and Year - ALN 14.231: E19MC260006, E20MC260006, E20MW260006, E21MC260006 ALN 20.507 and 20.526: All awards included on the schedule under the ALNs Pass through Entity - N/A Finding Type Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - A nonfederal entity must have adequate procedures in place to verify that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded (2 CFR sections 200.212 and 200.318(h); 2 CFR section 180.300; 48 CFR section 52.209 6). Additionally, a nonfederal entity requires a cost price analysis to be performed with every procurement action in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold (2 CFR section 200.324). Condition During procurement testing, we noted two contracts for which the City did not review sam.gov to ensure the entity was not suspended or debarred. Additionally, we noted one contract for which the City did not perform the required cost price analysis. Questioned Costs - None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - The contracts identified above was tested among a sample of 15 contracts in total, a sample of 8 for ESG and a sample of 7 for FTC. Cause and Effect - The City?s controls were not adequate to comply with suspension and debarment and cost price analysis requirements. A possible effect is that the City could be responsible for repaying costs charged to the grant if it enters into a transaction with an entity that is suspended or debarred or that the appropriate cost price analysis has not been performed. Recommendation We recommend the City implement adequate controls to ensure verification of debarment, suspension, or exclusion takes place before entering into covered transactions, and, when required, a cost price analysis is performed. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - The City will review its current procurement policy and implement additional controls as needed to help ensure verification is performed as required and the required processes are followed.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 14.231, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Emergency Solutions Grant Program, including COVID-19 ALN 20.507 and 20.526, Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Cluster, including COVID 19 Federal Award Identification Number and Year - ALN 14.231: E19MC260006, E20MC260006, E20MW260006, E21MC260006 ALN 20.507 and 20.526: All awards included on the schedule under the ALNs Pass through Entity - N/A Finding Type Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - A nonfederal entity must have adequate procedures in place to verify that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded (2 CFR sections 200.212 and 200.318(h); 2 CFR section 180.300; 48 CFR section 52.209 6). Additionally, a nonfederal entity requires a cost price analysis to be performed with every procurement action in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold (2 CFR section 200.324). Condition During procurement testing, we noted two contracts for which the City did not review sam.gov to ensure the entity was not suspended or debarred. Additionally, we noted one contract for which the City did not perform the required cost price analysis. Questioned Costs - None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - The contracts identified above was tested among a sample of 15 contracts in total, a sample of 8 for ESG and a sample of 7 for FTC. Cause and Effect - The City?s controls were not adequate to comply with suspension and debarment and cost price analysis requirements. A possible effect is that the City could be responsible for repaying costs charged to the grant if it enters into a transaction with an entity that is suspended or debarred or that the appropriate cost price analysis has not been performed. Recommendation We recommend the City implement adequate controls to ensure verification of debarment, suspension, or exclusion takes place before entering into covered transactions, and, when required, a cost price analysis is performed. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - The City will review its current procurement policy and implement additional controls as needed to help ensure verification is performed as required and the required processes are followed.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 14.231, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Emergency Solutions Grant Program, including COVID-19 ALN 20.507 and 20.526, Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Cluster, including COVID 19 Federal Award Identification Number and Year - ALN 14.231: E19MC260006, E20MC260006, E20MW260006, E21MC260006 ALN 20.507 and 20.526: All awards included on the schedule under the ALNs Pass through Entity - N/A Finding Type Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - A nonfederal entity must have adequate procedures in place to verify that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded (2 CFR sections 200.212 and 200.318(h); 2 CFR section 180.300; 48 CFR section 52.209 6). Additionally, a nonfederal entity requires a cost price analysis to be performed with every procurement action in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold (2 CFR section 200.324). Condition During procurement testing, we noted two contracts for which the City did not review sam.gov to ensure the entity was not suspended or debarred. Additionally, we noted one contract for which the City did not perform the required cost price analysis. Questioned Costs - None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - The contracts identified above was tested among a sample of 15 contracts in total, a sample of 8 for ESG and a sample of 7 for FTC. Cause and Effect - The City?s controls were not adequate to comply with suspension and debarment and cost price analysis requirements. A possible effect is that the City could be responsible for repaying costs charged to the grant if it enters into a transaction with an entity that is suspended or debarred or that the appropriate cost price analysis has not been performed. Recommendation We recommend the City implement adequate controls to ensure verification of debarment, suspension, or exclusion takes place before entering into covered transactions, and, when required, a cost price analysis is performed. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - The City will review its current procurement policy and implement additional controls as needed to help ensure verification is performed as required and the required processes are followed.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 14.231, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Emergency Solutions Grant Program, including COVID-19 ALN 20.507 and 20.526, Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Cluster, including COVID 19 Federal Award Identification Number and Year - ALN 14.231: E19MC260006, E20MC260006, E20MW260006, E21MC260006 ALN 20.507 and 20.526: All awards included on the schedule under the ALNs Pass through Entity - N/A Finding Type Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - A nonfederal entity must have adequate procedures in place to verify that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded (2 CFR sections 200.212 and 200.318(h); 2 CFR section 180.300; 48 CFR section 52.209 6). Additionally, a nonfederal entity requires a cost price analysis to be performed with every procurement action in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold (2 CFR section 200.324). Condition During procurement testing, we noted two contracts for which the City did not review sam.gov to ensure the entity was not suspended or debarred. Additionally, we noted one contract for which the City did not perform the required cost price analysis. Questioned Costs - None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - The contracts identified above was tested among a sample of 15 contracts in total, a sample of 8 for ESG and a sample of 7 for FTC. Cause and Effect - The City?s controls were not adequate to comply with suspension and debarment and cost price analysis requirements. A possible effect is that the City could be responsible for repaying costs charged to the grant if it enters into a transaction with an entity that is suspended or debarred or that the appropriate cost price analysis has not been performed. Recommendation We recommend the City implement adequate controls to ensure verification of debarment, suspension, or exclusion takes place before entering into covered transactions, and, when required, a cost price analysis is performed. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - The City will review its current procurement policy and implement additional controls as needed to help ensure verification is performed as required and the required processes are followed.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 14.231, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Emergency Solutions Grant Program, including COVID-19 ALN 20.507 and 20.526, Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Cluster, including COVID 19 Federal Award Identification Number and Year - ALN 14.231: E19MC260006, E20MC260006, E20MW260006, E21MC260006 ALN 20.507 and 20.526: All awards included on the schedule under the ALNs Pass through Entity - N/A Finding Type Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - A nonfederal entity must have adequate procedures in place to verify that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded (2 CFR sections 200.212 and 200.318(h); 2 CFR section 180.300; 48 CFR section 52.209 6). Additionally, a nonfederal entity requires a cost price analysis to be performed with every procurement action in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold (2 CFR section 200.324). Condition During procurement testing, we noted two contracts for which the City did not review sam.gov to ensure the entity was not suspended or debarred. Additionally, we noted one contract for which the City did not perform the required cost price analysis. Questioned Costs - None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - The contracts identified above was tested among a sample of 15 contracts in total, a sample of 8 for ESG and a sample of 7 for FTC. Cause and Effect - The City?s controls were not adequate to comply with suspension and debarment and cost price analysis requirements. A possible effect is that the City could be responsible for repaying costs charged to the grant if it enters into a transaction with an entity that is suspended or debarred or that the appropriate cost price analysis has not been performed. Recommendation We recommend the City implement adequate controls to ensure verification of debarment, suspension, or exclusion takes place before entering into covered transactions, and, when required, a cost price analysis is performed. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - The City will review its current procurement policy and implement additional controls as needed to help ensure verification is performed as required and the required processes are followed.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 14.231, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Emergency Solutions Grant Program, including COVID-19 ALN 20.507 and 20.526, Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Cluster, including COVID 19 Federal Award Identification Number and Year - ALN 14.231: E19MC260006, E20MC260006, E20MW260006, E21MC260006 ALN 20.507 and 20.526: All awards included on the schedule under the ALNs Pass through Entity - N/A Finding Type Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - A nonfederal entity must have adequate procedures in place to verify that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded (2 CFR sections 200.212 and 200.318(h); 2 CFR section 180.300; 48 CFR section 52.209 6). Additionally, a nonfederal entity requires a cost price analysis to be performed with every procurement action in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold (2 CFR section 200.324). Condition During procurement testing, we noted two contracts for which the City did not review sam.gov to ensure the entity was not suspended or debarred. Additionally, we noted one contract for which the City did not perform the required cost price analysis. Questioned Costs - None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - The contracts identified above was tested among a sample of 15 contracts in total, a sample of 8 for ESG and a sample of 7 for FTC. Cause and Effect - The City?s controls were not adequate to comply with suspension and debarment and cost price analysis requirements. A possible effect is that the City could be responsible for repaying costs charged to the grant if it enters into a transaction with an entity that is suspended or debarred or that the appropriate cost price analysis has not been performed. Recommendation We recommend the City implement adequate controls to ensure verification of debarment, suspension, or exclusion takes place before entering into covered transactions, and, when required, a cost price analysis is performed. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - The City will review its current procurement policy and implement additional controls as needed to help ensure verification is performed as required and the required processes are followed.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 14.231, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Emergency Solutions Grant Program, including COVID-19 ALN 20.507 and 20.526, Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Cluster, including COVID 19 Federal Award Identification Number and Year - ALN 14.231: E19MC260006, E20MC260006, E20MW260006, E21MC260006 ALN 20.507 and 20.526: All awards included on the schedule under the ALNs Pass through Entity - N/A Finding Type Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - A nonfederal entity must have adequate procedures in place to verify that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded (2 CFR sections 200.212 and 200.318(h); 2 CFR section 180.300; 48 CFR section 52.209 6). Additionally, a nonfederal entity requires a cost price analysis to be performed with every procurement action in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold (2 CFR section 200.324). Condition During procurement testing, we noted two contracts for which the City did not review sam.gov to ensure the entity was not suspended or debarred. Additionally, we noted one contract for which the City did not perform the required cost price analysis. Questioned Costs - None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - The contracts identified above was tested among a sample of 15 contracts in total, a sample of 8 for ESG and a sample of 7 for FTC. Cause and Effect - The City?s controls were not adequate to comply with suspension and debarment and cost price analysis requirements. A possible effect is that the City could be responsible for repaying costs charged to the grant if it enters into a transaction with an entity that is suspended or debarred or that the appropriate cost price analysis has not been performed. Recommendation We recommend the City implement adequate controls to ensure verification of debarment, suspension, or exclusion takes place before entering into covered transactions, and, when required, a cost price analysis is performed. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - The City will review its current procurement policy and implement additional controls as needed to help ensure verification is performed as required and the required processes are followed.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 14.231, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Emergency Solutions Grant Program, including COVID-19 ALN 20.507 and 20.526, Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Cluster, including COVID 19 Federal Award Identification Number and Year - ALN 14.231: E19MC260006, E20MC260006, E20MW260006, E21MC260006 ALN 20.507 and 20.526: All awards included on the schedule under the ALNs Pass through Entity - N/A Finding Type Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - A nonfederal entity must have adequate procedures in place to verify that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded (2 CFR sections 200.212 and 200.318(h); 2 CFR section 180.300; 48 CFR section 52.209 6). Additionally, a nonfederal entity requires a cost price analysis to be performed with every procurement action in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold (2 CFR section 200.324). Condition During procurement testing, we noted two contracts for which the City did not review sam.gov to ensure the entity was not suspended or debarred. Additionally, we noted one contract for which the City did not perform the required cost price analysis. Questioned Costs - None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - The contracts identified above was tested among a sample of 15 contracts in total, a sample of 8 for ESG and a sample of 7 for FTC. Cause and Effect - The City?s controls were not adequate to comply with suspension and debarment and cost price analysis requirements. A possible effect is that the City could be responsible for repaying costs charged to the grant if it enters into a transaction with an entity that is suspended or debarred or that the appropriate cost price analysis has not been performed. Recommendation We recommend the City implement adequate controls to ensure verification of debarment, suspension, or exclusion takes place before entering into covered transactions, and, when required, a cost price analysis is performed. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - The City will review its current procurement policy and implement additional controls as needed to help ensure verification is performed as required and the required processes are followed.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 14.231, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Emergency Solutions Grant Program, including COVID-19 ALN 20.507 and 20.526, Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Cluster, including COVID 19 Federal Award Identification Number and Year - ALN 14.231: E19MC260006, E20MC260006, E20MW260006, E21MC260006 ALN 20.507 and 20.526: All awards included on the schedule under the ALNs Pass through Entity - N/A Finding Type Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - A nonfederal entity must have adequate procedures in place to verify that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded (2 CFR sections 200.212 and 200.318(h); 2 CFR section 180.300; 48 CFR section 52.209 6). Additionally, a nonfederal entity requires a cost price analysis to be performed with every procurement action in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold (2 CFR section 200.324). Condition During procurement testing, we noted two contracts for which the City did not review sam.gov to ensure the entity was not suspended or debarred. Additionally, we noted one contract for which the City did not perform the required cost price analysis. Questioned Costs - None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - The contracts identified above was tested among a sample of 15 contracts in total, a sample of 8 for ESG and a sample of 7 for FTC. Cause and Effect - The City?s controls were not adequate to comply with suspension and debarment and cost price analysis requirements. A possible effect is that the City could be responsible for repaying costs charged to the grant if it enters into a transaction with an entity that is suspended or debarred or that the appropriate cost price analysis has not been performed. Recommendation We recommend the City implement adequate controls to ensure verification of debarment, suspension, or exclusion takes place before entering into covered transactions, and, when required, a cost price analysis is performed. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - The City will review its current procurement policy and implement additional controls as needed to help ensure verification is performed as required and the required processes are followed.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 14.231, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Emergency Solutions Grant Program, including COVID-19 ALN 20.507 and 20.526, Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Cluster, including COVID 19 Federal Award Identification Number and Year - ALN 14.231: E19MC260006, E20MC260006, E20MW260006, E21MC260006 ALN 20.507 and 20.526: All awards included on the schedule under the ALNs Pass through Entity - N/A Finding Type Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - A nonfederal entity must have adequate procedures in place to verify that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded (2 CFR sections 200.212 and 200.318(h); 2 CFR section 180.300; 48 CFR section 52.209 6). Additionally, a nonfederal entity requires a cost price analysis to be performed with every procurement action in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold (2 CFR section 200.324). Condition During procurement testing, we noted two contracts for which the City did not review sam.gov to ensure the entity was not suspended or debarred. Additionally, we noted one contract for which the City did not perform the required cost price analysis. Questioned Costs - None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - The contracts identified above was tested among a sample of 15 contracts in total, a sample of 8 for ESG and a sample of 7 for FTC. Cause and Effect - The City?s controls were not adequate to comply with suspension and debarment and cost price analysis requirements. A possible effect is that the City could be responsible for repaying costs charged to the grant if it enters into a transaction with an entity that is suspended or debarred or that the appropriate cost price analysis has not been performed. Recommendation We recommend the City implement adequate controls to ensure verification of debarment, suspension, or exclusion takes place before entering into covered transactions, and, when required, a cost price analysis is performed. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - The City will review its current procurement policy and implement additional controls as needed to help ensure verification is performed as required and the required processes are followed.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 14.231, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Emergency Solutions Grant Program, including COVID-19 ALN 20.507 and 20.526, Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Cluster, including COVID 19 Federal Award Identification Number and Year - ALN 14.231: E19MC260006, E20MC260006, E20MW260006, E21MC260006 ALN 20.507 and 20.526: All awards included on the schedule under the ALNs Pass through Entity - N/A Finding Type Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - A nonfederal entity must have adequate procedures in place to verify that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded (2 CFR sections 200.212 and 200.318(h); 2 CFR section 180.300; 48 CFR section 52.209 6). Additionally, a nonfederal entity requires a cost price analysis to be performed with every procurement action in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold (2 CFR section 200.324). Condition During procurement testing, we noted two contracts for which the City did not review sam.gov to ensure the entity was not suspended or debarred. Additionally, we noted one contract for which the City did not perform the required cost price analysis. Questioned Costs - None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - The contracts identified above was tested among a sample of 15 contracts in total, a sample of 8 for ESG and a sample of 7 for FTC. Cause and Effect - The City?s controls were not adequate to comply with suspension and debarment and cost price analysis requirements. A possible effect is that the City could be responsible for repaying costs charged to the grant if it enters into a transaction with an entity that is suspended or debarred or that the appropriate cost price analysis has not been performed. Recommendation We recommend the City implement adequate controls to ensure verification of debarment, suspension, or exclusion takes place before entering into covered transactions, and, when required, a cost price analysis is performed. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - The City will review its current procurement policy and implement additional controls as needed to help ensure verification is performed as required and the required processes are followed.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 14.231, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Emergency Solutions Grant Program, including COVID-19 ALN 20.507 and 20.526, Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Cluster, including COVID 19 Federal Award Identification Number and Year - ALN 14.231: E19MC260006, E20MC260006, E20MW260006, E21MC260006 ALN 20.507 and 20.526: All awards included on the schedule under the ALNs Pass through Entity - N/A Finding Type Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - A nonfederal entity must have adequate procedures in place to verify that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded (2 CFR sections 200.212 and 200.318(h); 2 CFR section 180.300; 48 CFR section 52.209 6). Additionally, a nonfederal entity requires a cost price analysis to be performed with every procurement action in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold (2 CFR section 200.324). Condition During procurement testing, we noted two contracts for which the City did not review sam.gov to ensure the entity was not suspended or debarred. Additionally, we noted one contract for which the City did not perform the required cost price analysis. Questioned Costs - None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - The contracts identified above was tested among a sample of 15 contracts in total, a sample of 8 for ESG and a sample of 7 for FTC. Cause and Effect - The City?s controls were not adequate to comply with suspension and debarment and cost price analysis requirements. A possible effect is that the City could be responsible for repaying costs charged to the grant if it enters into a transaction with an entity that is suspended or debarred or that the appropriate cost price analysis has not been performed. Recommendation We recommend the City implement adequate controls to ensure verification of debarment, suspension, or exclusion takes place before entering into covered transactions, and, when required, a cost price analysis is performed. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - The City will review its current procurement policy and implement additional controls as needed to help ensure verification is performed as required and the required processes are followed.
B. FINDINGS - FINANCIAL STATEMENT AUDIT IC-2022-001: Financial Reporting (Material Weakness) Condition: Material misstatements within the financial statements were identified throughout the audit. Criteria: Management should have processes and procedures in place so as to be able to generate financial statements and reports that are complete and accurate on a timely basis and in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). Cause: The current size of the finance staffing of the County and School Board may not be sufficient to detect and prevent material errors. Effect: Financial statements and reports prepared in accordance with GAAP were not able to be generated accurately on a timely basis. Recommendation: We recommend that management re-evaluate the current staff structure and assignment of responsibilities in order to re-align roles and responsibilities with appropriate personnel or otherwise bolster their resource base so as to be able to meet the criteria. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: See Corrective Action Plan. C. FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS - MAJOR FEDERAL AWARD PROGRAM AUDIT FA-2022-001: Procurement (Material Weakness) Condition: The School Board?s written procurement policies do not include policies that cover CFR ?200.318e, ?200.318f, ?200.318i, ?200.319b, ?200.319c, ?200.319d, ?200.319e, ?200.320a1, ?200,322, ?200.324b, ?200.326 and ?200.327. Criteria: Non-federal entities must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR (Uniform Guidance) ?200.318 through ?200.327. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. Cause: The procurement policies for the School Board do not include the policies stated above, required by Uniform Guidance. Effect: The School Board?s policies do not comply with procurement requirements for federal awards (Uniform Guidance). Questioned Cost Amount: n/a Perspective Information: n/a Context: n/a Recommendation: Procurement policies should be reviewed and updated to be in compliance with the requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: See Corrective Action Plan.
Noncompliance and Material Weakness 2 CFR 3474.1 provides that the Department of Education (DOE) adopts the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Guidance in 2 CFR part 200. Thus, this section gives regulatory effect to the OMB guidance and supplements the guidance as needed for the DOE, except as otherwise noted in that section. Non-Federal entities other than States, including those operating Federal programs as subrecipients of States, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.327. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable State and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200. A nonfederal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR 200.318, which include oversight of contractors? performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR 200.320(a)(1) and (2). Under the micro-purchase method, the aggregate dollar amount does not exceed $10,000 ($2,000 in the case of acquisition for construction subject to the Wage Rate Requirements (Davis-Bacon Act)). Small purchase procedures are used for purchases that exceed the micro-purchase amount but do not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold ($250,000). Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive quotations if the non-Federal entity considers the price to be reasonable (2 CFR 200.320(a)(1)(ii)). If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources (2 CFR 200.320(a)(2)(i)). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-Federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR 200.320(b)(1); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR 200.320(b)(2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of five circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR 200.320(c). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR 200.324(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR 200.324(d)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR 200.327. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, ?Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.? Western Toledo Preparatory Academy Procurement Policy for Federal Grants indicates the following methods of procurement will be used for all purchases of goods and services made with federal funds: 1. Purchases under $2,000 require little formal documentation; they are likely to be a catalog purchase, with prices that are readily available from many vendors. A quick notation or copy of the prices checked from at least one other source should be attached to the order or noted in the file. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner that maximizes opportunities, increases quality (if a factor), and reduces cost of the purchase. 2. Purchases from $2,000 to $10,000 should have a telephone or other quotations and simple purchase or performance descriptions. Inquire in the open market to ensure an advantageous price and quality. The file should document the inquiries made and offers received from at least three sources. 3. Purchases from $10,000 to $100,000 should be treated more formally, though the acquisition procedures can still be somewhat streamlined. Consider using mini-proposals for negotiated acquisitions; more formal purchase and performance descriptions should be included, with bid responses requirements spelled out. To ensure that you have an adequate number of bidders, you may wish to advertise and devise pre-qualification procedures aimed at vendors who offer goods and services you use often. Purchases over $10,000 require grater documentation and cost allowability, need for the procurement, and the vendor selection. Request competitive quotes orally or in writing, from at least three different sources. The file shall document each invitation made and offer received. Document Prices: Maintain files on all quotations solicited and offers and bides received and any criteria for selection. In all instances in which the lowest bid is not awarded in the contract, justification for the selection must me contained in the file. Due to deficiencies in monitoring compliance over procurement, 18 percent of the procurements did not contain the required price or rate quotations. The Academy expended the following amounts without using the proper procurement method: o $30,559 was paid to a vendor for materials and installation of a projector; however, the Academy could not provide documentation to support the required price quotations were obtained from a minimum of three vendors. o $17,588 was paid to a vendor for materials and installation of a video surveillance system; however, the Academy could not provide documentation to support the required price quotations were obtained from a minimum of three vendors. Without proper controls over procurement, there is an increased risk that the Academy is not in compliance with applicable federal regulations. Noncompliance could result in federal funding being reduced or taken away, or other sanctions imposed by the federal grantor agency. The Academy should review the procurement requirements specified above and ensure the proper procurement method is used. The Academy should also maintain adequate documentation to detail the history of procurement. Officials? Response: See Corrective Action Plan
2 CFR 3474.1 provides that the Department of Education (DOE) adopts the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Guidance in 2 CFR part 200. Thus, this section gives regulatory effect to the OMB guidance and supplements the guidance as needed for the DOE, except as otherwise noted in that section. Non-Federal entities other than States, including those operating Federal programs as subrecipients of States, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.327. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable State and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200. A nonfederal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR 200.318, which include oversight of contractors? performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR 200.320(a)(1) and (2). Under the micro-purchase method, the aggregate dollar amount does not exceed $10,000 ($2,000 in the case of acquisition for construction subject to the Wage Rate Requirements (Davis-Bacon Act)). Small purchase procedures are used for purchases that exceed the micro-purchase amount but do not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold ($250,000). Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive quotations if the non-Federal entity considers the price to be reasonable (2 CFR 200.320(a)(1)(ii)). If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources (2 CFR 200.320(a)(2)(i)). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-Federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR 200.320(b)(1); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR 200.320(b)(2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of five circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR 200.320(c). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR 200.324(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR 200.324(d)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR 200.327. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, ?Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards. Black River Local School District Board Policy DJF-R ? Purchasing Procedures indicates the following methods of procurement will be used for all purchases of goods and services made with federal funds: 1. Micro-purchases are purchases up to $10,000 and may be made in accordance with District purchasing procedures when the costs are reasonable. To the extent practicable, these purchases are distributed equitably among qualified suppliers. 2. Small purchase are purchases between $10,000 and $250,000. Prior to authorizing the purchase, the District will try to obtain price rates or quotations from a minimum of three vendors or providers. The District will obtain these price rates or quotations by written quotes. 3. Sealed bid procedures are used for firm fixed price contracts over $250,000 and is used as the preferred method for construction projects. Bids are solicited from an adequate number of known suppliers, which cannot be less than two responsible bidders. The District will solicit bids by posting bids using at least one public posting source. The contract will be awarded to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder. 4. Competitive proposals are used for all purchases over $250,000 for which sealed bids are not appropriate and must be used for architectural or engineering services. Contracts entered into for competitive proposals may be fixed-price or cost reimbursement. The District will publicize a request for proposal by advertising through the local paper or using a procurement source. The District will evaluate proposals in order to award the contract to the most advantageous proposal when considering cost and other factors. The District will evaluate proposals by checklist and compare. 5. Sole source procurement is used only when the goods or services are only available from a single source; a public exigency or emergency exists; there is inadequate competition and the applicable pass through entity approves this method. Lack of proper internal controls over Federal Grants management led to the District expending the following amounts without using the proper procurement method: Education Stabilization Fund - Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER II) Fund, AL #84.425D ? $33,000 was paid to a vendor for electrical work related to a HVAC project; however, the District could not provide documentation to support the required price quotations were obtained from a minimum of three vendors. ? $350,000 was paid to a vendor for a HVAC project; however, the District could not provide documentation to support sealed bids were solicited and received, and the contract awarded to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder. ? $226,752 was paid to a vendor for a HVAC project; however, the District could not provide documentation to support the required price quotations were obtained from a minimum of three vendors. Education Stabilization Fund - American Rescue Plan Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ARP ESSER) Fund, AL #84.425U ? $1,898,392 was paid to a vendor for the design and build of kindergarten and high school classrooms; however, the District could not provide documentation to support sealed bids were solicited and received and the contract awarded to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder. Without proper controls over procurement, there is an increased risk that the District is not in compliance with applicable federal regulations. Noncompliance could result in federal funding being reduced or taken away, or other sanctions imposed by the federal grantor agency. The District should review the procurement requirements specified above and ensure the proper procurement method is used. The District should also maintain adequate documentation to detail the history of procurement.
2 CFR 3474.1 provides that the Department of Education (DOE) adopts the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Guidance in 2 CFR part 200. Thus, this section gives regulatory effect to the OMB guidance and supplements the guidance as needed for the DOE, except as otherwise noted in that section. Non-Federal entities other than States, including those operating Federal programs as subrecipients of States, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.327. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable State and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200. A nonfederal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR 200.318, which include oversight of contractors? performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR 200.320(a)(1) and (2). Under the micro-purchase method, the aggregate dollar amount does not exceed $10,000 ($2,000 in the case of acquisition for construction subject to the Wage Rate Requirements (Davis-Bacon Act)). Small purchase procedures are used for purchases that exceed the micro-purchase amount but do not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold ($250,000). Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive quotations if the non-Federal entity considers the price to be reasonable (2 CFR 200.320(a)(1)(ii)). If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources (2 CFR 200.320(a)(2)(i)). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-Federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR 200.320(b)(1); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR 200.320(b)(2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of five circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR 200.320(c). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR 200.324(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR 200.324(d)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR 200.327. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, ?Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards. Black River Local School District Board Policy DJF-R ? Purchasing Procedures indicates the following methods of procurement will be used for all purchases of goods and services made with federal funds: 1. Micro-purchases are purchases up to $10,000 and may be made in accordance with District purchasing procedures when the costs are reasonable. To the extent practicable, these purchases are distributed equitably among qualified suppliers. 2. Small purchase are purchases between $10,000 and $250,000. Prior to authorizing the purchase, the District will try to obtain price rates or quotations from a minimum of three vendors or providers. The District will obtain these price rates or quotations by written quotes. 3. Sealed bid procedures are used for firm fixed price contracts over $250,000 and is used as the preferred method for construction projects. Bids are solicited from an adequate number of known suppliers, which cannot be less than two responsible bidders. The District will solicit bids by posting bids using at least one public posting source. The contract will be awarded to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder. 4. Competitive proposals are used for all purchases over $250,000 for which sealed bids are not appropriate and must be used for architectural or engineering services. Contracts entered into for competitive proposals may be fixed-price or cost reimbursement. The District will publicize a request for proposal by advertising through the local paper or using a procurement source. The District will evaluate proposals in order to award the contract to the most advantageous proposal when considering cost and other factors. The District will evaluate proposals by checklist and compare. 5. Sole source procurement is used only when the goods or services are only available from a single source; a public exigency or emergency exists; there is inadequate competition and the applicable pass through entity approves this method. Lack of proper internal controls over Federal Grants management led to the District expending the following amounts without using the proper procurement method: Education Stabilization Fund - Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER II) Fund, AL #84.425D ? $33,000 was paid to a vendor for electrical work related to a HVAC project; however, the District could not provide documentation to support the required price quotations were obtained from a minimum of three vendors. ? $350,000 was paid to a vendor for a HVAC project; however, the District could not provide documentation to support sealed bids were solicited and received, and the contract awarded to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder. ? $226,752 was paid to a vendor for a HVAC project; however, the District could not provide documentation to support the required price quotations were obtained from a minimum of three vendors. Education Stabilization Fund - American Rescue Plan Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ARP ESSER) Fund, AL #84.425U ? $1,898,392 was paid to a vendor for the design and build of kindergarten and high school classrooms; however, the District could not provide documentation to support sealed bids were solicited and received and the contract awarded to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder. Without proper controls over procurement, there is an increased risk that the District is not in compliance with applicable federal regulations. Noncompliance could result in federal funding being reduced or taken away, or other sanctions imposed by the federal grantor agency. The District should review the procurement requirements specified above and ensure the proper procurement method is used. The District should also maintain adequate documentation to detail the history of procurement.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 14.231, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Emergency Solutions Grant Program, including COVID-19 ALN 20.507 and 20.526, Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Cluster, including COVID 19 Federal Award Identification Number and Year - ALN 14.231: E19MC260006, E20MC260006, E20MW260006, E21MC260006 ALN 20.507 and 20.526: All awards included on the schedule under the ALNs Pass through Entity - N/A Finding Type Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - A nonfederal entity must have adequate procedures in place to verify that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded (2 CFR sections 200.212 and 200.318(h); 2 CFR section 180.300; 48 CFR section 52.209 6). Additionally, a nonfederal entity requires a cost price analysis to be performed with every procurement action in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold (2 CFR section 200.324). Condition During procurement testing, we noted two contracts for which the City did not review sam.gov to ensure the entity was not suspended or debarred. Additionally, we noted one contract for which the City did not perform the required cost price analysis. Questioned Costs - None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - The contracts identified above was tested among a sample of 15 contracts in total, a sample of 8 for ESG and a sample of 7 for FTC. Cause and Effect - The City?s controls were not adequate to comply with suspension and debarment and cost price analysis requirements. A possible effect is that the City could be responsible for repaying costs charged to the grant if it enters into a transaction with an entity that is suspended or debarred or that the appropriate cost price analysis has not been performed. Recommendation We recommend the City implement adequate controls to ensure verification of debarment, suspension, or exclusion takes place before entering into covered transactions, and, when required, a cost price analysis is performed. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - The City will review its current procurement policy and implement additional controls as needed to help ensure verification is performed as required and the required processes are followed.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 14.231, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Emergency Solutions Grant Program, including COVID-19 ALN 20.507 and 20.526, Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Cluster, including COVID 19 Federal Award Identification Number and Year - ALN 14.231: E19MC260006, E20MC260006, E20MW260006, E21MC260006 ALN 20.507 and 20.526: All awards included on the schedule under the ALNs Pass through Entity - N/A Finding Type Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - A nonfederal entity must have adequate procedures in place to verify that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded (2 CFR sections 200.212 and 200.318(h); 2 CFR section 180.300; 48 CFR section 52.209 6). Additionally, a nonfederal entity requires a cost price analysis to be performed with every procurement action in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold (2 CFR section 200.324). Condition During procurement testing, we noted two contracts for which the City did not review sam.gov to ensure the entity was not suspended or debarred. Additionally, we noted one contract for which the City did not perform the required cost price analysis. Questioned Costs - None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - The contracts identified above was tested among a sample of 15 contracts in total, a sample of 8 for ESG and a sample of 7 for FTC. Cause and Effect - The City?s controls were not adequate to comply with suspension and debarment and cost price analysis requirements. A possible effect is that the City could be responsible for repaying costs charged to the grant if it enters into a transaction with an entity that is suspended or debarred or that the appropriate cost price analysis has not been performed. Recommendation We recommend the City implement adequate controls to ensure verification of debarment, suspension, or exclusion takes place before entering into covered transactions, and, when required, a cost price analysis is performed. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - The City will review its current procurement policy and implement additional controls as needed to help ensure verification is performed as required and the required processes are followed.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 14.231, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Emergency Solutions Grant Program, including COVID-19 ALN 20.507 and 20.526, Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Cluster, including COVID 19 Federal Award Identification Number and Year - ALN 14.231: E19MC260006, E20MC260006, E20MW260006, E21MC260006 ALN 20.507 and 20.526: All awards included on the schedule under the ALNs Pass through Entity - N/A Finding Type Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - A nonfederal entity must have adequate procedures in place to verify that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded (2 CFR sections 200.212 and 200.318(h); 2 CFR section 180.300; 48 CFR section 52.209 6). Additionally, a nonfederal entity requires a cost price analysis to be performed with every procurement action in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold (2 CFR section 200.324). Condition During procurement testing, we noted two contracts for which the City did not review sam.gov to ensure the entity was not suspended or debarred. Additionally, we noted one contract for which the City did not perform the required cost price analysis. Questioned Costs - None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - The contracts identified above was tested among a sample of 15 contracts in total, a sample of 8 for ESG and a sample of 7 for FTC. Cause and Effect - The City?s controls were not adequate to comply with suspension and debarment and cost price analysis requirements. A possible effect is that the City could be responsible for repaying costs charged to the grant if it enters into a transaction with an entity that is suspended or debarred or that the appropriate cost price analysis has not been performed. Recommendation We recommend the City implement adequate controls to ensure verification of debarment, suspension, or exclusion takes place before entering into covered transactions, and, when required, a cost price analysis is performed. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - The City will review its current procurement policy and implement additional controls as needed to help ensure verification is performed as required and the required processes are followed.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 14.231, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Emergency Solutions Grant Program, including COVID-19 ALN 20.507 and 20.526, Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Cluster, including COVID 19 Federal Award Identification Number and Year - ALN 14.231: E19MC260006, E20MC260006, E20MW260006, E21MC260006 ALN 20.507 and 20.526: All awards included on the schedule under the ALNs Pass through Entity - N/A Finding Type Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - A nonfederal entity must have adequate procedures in place to verify that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded (2 CFR sections 200.212 and 200.318(h); 2 CFR section 180.300; 48 CFR section 52.209 6). Additionally, a nonfederal entity requires a cost price analysis to be performed with every procurement action in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold (2 CFR section 200.324). Condition During procurement testing, we noted two contracts for which the City did not review sam.gov to ensure the entity was not suspended or debarred. Additionally, we noted one contract for which the City did not perform the required cost price analysis. Questioned Costs - None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - The contracts identified above was tested among a sample of 15 contracts in total, a sample of 8 for ESG and a sample of 7 for FTC. Cause and Effect - The City?s controls were not adequate to comply with suspension and debarment and cost price analysis requirements. A possible effect is that the City could be responsible for repaying costs charged to the grant if it enters into a transaction with an entity that is suspended or debarred or that the appropriate cost price analysis has not been performed. Recommendation We recommend the City implement adequate controls to ensure verification of debarment, suspension, or exclusion takes place before entering into covered transactions, and, when required, a cost price analysis is performed. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - The City will review its current procurement policy and implement additional controls as needed to help ensure verification is performed as required and the required processes are followed.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 14.231, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Emergency Solutions Grant Program, including COVID-19 ALN 20.507 and 20.526, Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Cluster, including COVID 19 Federal Award Identification Number and Year - ALN 14.231: E19MC260006, E20MC260006, E20MW260006, E21MC260006 ALN 20.507 and 20.526: All awards included on the schedule under the ALNs Pass through Entity - N/A Finding Type Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - A nonfederal entity must have adequate procedures in place to verify that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded (2 CFR sections 200.212 and 200.318(h); 2 CFR section 180.300; 48 CFR section 52.209 6). Additionally, a nonfederal entity requires a cost price analysis to be performed with every procurement action in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold (2 CFR section 200.324). Condition During procurement testing, we noted two contracts for which the City did not review sam.gov to ensure the entity was not suspended or debarred. Additionally, we noted one contract for which the City did not perform the required cost price analysis. Questioned Costs - None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - The contracts identified above was tested among a sample of 15 contracts in total, a sample of 8 for ESG and a sample of 7 for FTC. Cause and Effect - The City?s controls were not adequate to comply with suspension and debarment and cost price analysis requirements. A possible effect is that the City could be responsible for repaying costs charged to the grant if it enters into a transaction with an entity that is suspended or debarred or that the appropriate cost price analysis has not been performed. Recommendation We recommend the City implement adequate controls to ensure verification of debarment, suspension, or exclusion takes place before entering into covered transactions, and, when required, a cost price analysis is performed. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - The City will review its current procurement policy and implement additional controls as needed to help ensure verification is performed as required and the required processes are followed.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 14.231, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Emergency Solutions Grant Program, including COVID-19 ALN 20.507 and 20.526, Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Cluster, including COVID 19 Federal Award Identification Number and Year - ALN 14.231: E19MC260006, E20MC260006, E20MW260006, E21MC260006 ALN 20.507 and 20.526: All awards included on the schedule under the ALNs Pass through Entity - N/A Finding Type Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - A nonfederal entity must have adequate procedures in place to verify that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded (2 CFR sections 200.212 and 200.318(h); 2 CFR section 180.300; 48 CFR section 52.209 6). Additionally, a nonfederal entity requires a cost price analysis to be performed with every procurement action in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold (2 CFR section 200.324). Condition During procurement testing, we noted two contracts for which the City did not review sam.gov to ensure the entity was not suspended or debarred. Additionally, we noted one contract for which the City did not perform the required cost price analysis. Questioned Costs - None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - The contracts identified above was tested among a sample of 15 contracts in total, a sample of 8 for ESG and a sample of 7 for FTC. Cause and Effect - The City?s controls were not adequate to comply with suspension and debarment and cost price analysis requirements. A possible effect is that the City could be responsible for repaying costs charged to the grant if it enters into a transaction with an entity that is suspended or debarred or that the appropriate cost price analysis has not been performed. Recommendation We recommend the City implement adequate controls to ensure verification of debarment, suspension, or exclusion takes place before entering into covered transactions, and, when required, a cost price analysis is performed. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - The City will review its current procurement policy and implement additional controls as needed to help ensure verification is performed as required and the required processes are followed.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 14.231, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Emergency Solutions Grant Program, including COVID-19 ALN 20.507 and 20.526, Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Cluster, including COVID 19 Federal Award Identification Number and Year - ALN 14.231: E19MC260006, E20MC260006, E20MW260006, E21MC260006 ALN 20.507 and 20.526: All awards included on the schedule under the ALNs Pass through Entity - N/A Finding Type Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - A nonfederal entity must have adequate procedures in place to verify that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded (2 CFR sections 200.212 and 200.318(h); 2 CFR section 180.300; 48 CFR section 52.209 6). Additionally, a nonfederal entity requires a cost price analysis to be performed with every procurement action in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold (2 CFR section 200.324). Condition During procurement testing, we noted two contracts for which the City did not review sam.gov to ensure the entity was not suspended or debarred. Additionally, we noted one contract for which the City did not perform the required cost price analysis. Questioned Costs - None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - The contracts identified above was tested among a sample of 15 contracts in total, a sample of 8 for ESG and a sample of 7 for FTC. Cause and Effect - The City?s controls were not adequate to comply with suspension and debarment and cost price analysis requirements. A possible effect is that the City could be responsible for repaying costs charged to the grant if it enters into a transaction with an entity that is suspended or debarred or that the appropriate cost price analysis has not been performed. Recommendation We recommend the City implement adequate controls to ensure verification of debarment, suspension, or exclusion takes place before entering into covered transactions, and, when required, a cost price analysis is performed. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - The City will review its current procurement policy and implement additional controls as needed to help ensure verification is performed as required and the required processes are followed.