2022-003 Noncompliance with Procurement Requirements Federal Programs: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CFDA No. 21.027) and Special Education (CFDA No.?s 84.027 and 84.173) Criteria: Recipients are required to comply with 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.327, including ensuring that the procurement method used for the contracts are appropriate based on the dollar amount and conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320. The Board follows the Annotated Code of Maryland, the Education Article, and Board Policy DJB with respect to procurement. For purchases between $3,501 and $25,000, two written oral quotes must be acquired. Condition: Seven purchases between $3,501 and $25,000 were noted for which there was not documentation of two quotes or supporting documentation of single sourcing. Cause: The individuals in charge of purchasing did not document their procedures. Effect: The Board is not in compliance with the procurement requirements of the grant which could affect future funding. Repeat Finding: This finding was not a finding in FY21. Recommendation: We recommend the grants administrators communicate procurement requirements, including documentation requirements, to purchasing agents in order to avoid future misinterpretations and noncompliance. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The Board will communicate procurement requirements to purchasing agents in order to avoid future misinterpretation and noncompliance. In most instances, evidence of procurement requirement compliance was observed, but not documented appropriately for compliance requirements.
2022-003 Noncompliance with Procurement Requirements Federal Programs: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CFDA No. 21.027) and Special Education (CFDA No.?s 84.027 and 84.173) Criteria: Recipients are required to comply with 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.327, including ensuring that the procurement method used for the contracts are appropriate based on the dollar amount and conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320. The Board follows the Annotated Code of Maryland, the Education Article, and Board Policy DJB with respect to procurement. For purchases between $3,501 and $25,000, two written oral quotes must be acquired. Condition: Seven purchases between $3,501 and $25,000 were noted for which there was not documentation of two quotes or supporting documentation of single sourcing. Cause: The individuals in charge of purchasing did not document their procedures. Effect: The Board is not in compliance with the procurement requirements of the grant which could affect future funding. Repeat Finding: This finding was not a finding in FY21. Recommendation: We recommend the grants administrators communicate procurement requirements, including documentation requirements, to purchasing agents in order to avoid future misinterpretations and noncompliance. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The Board will communicate procurement requirements to purchasing agents in order to avoid future misinterpretation and noncompliance. In most instances, evidence of procurement requirement compliance was observed, but not documented appropriately for compliance requirements.
2022-003 Noncompliance with Procurement Requirements Federal Programs: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CFDA No. 21.027) and Special Education (CFDA No.?s 84.027 and 84.173) Criteria: Recipients are required to comply with 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.327, including ensuring that the procurement method used for the contracts are appropriate based on the dollar amount and conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320. The Board follows the Annotated Code of Maryland, the Education Article, and Board Policy DJB with respect to procurement. For purchases between $3,501 and $25,000, two written oral quotes must be acquired. Condition: Seven purchases between $3,501 and $25,000 were noted for which there was not documentation of two quotes or supporting documentation of single sourcing. Cause: The individuals in charge of purchasing did not document their procedures. Effect: The Board is not in compliance with the procurement requirements of the grant which could affect future funding. Repeat Finding: This finding was not a finding in FY21. Recommendation: We recommend the grants administrators communicate procurement requirements, including documentation requirements, to purchasing agents in order to avoid future misinterpretations and noncompliance. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The Board will communicate procurement requirements to purchasing agents in order to avoid future misinterpretation and noncompliance. In most instances, evidence of procurement requirement compliance was observed, but not documented appropriately for compliance requirements.
2022-003 Noncompliance with Procurement Requirements Federal Programs: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CFDA No. 21.027) and Special Education (CFDA No.?s 84.027 and 84.173) Criteria: Recipients are required to comply with 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.327, including ensuring that the procurement method used for the contracts are appropriate based on the dollar amount and conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320. The Board follows the Annotated Code of Maryland, the Education Article, and Board Policy DJB with respect to procurement. For purchases between $3,501 and $25,000, two written oral quotes must be acquired. Condition: Seven purchases between $3,501 and $25,000 were noted for which there was not documentation of two quotes or supporting documentation of single sourcing. Cause: The individuals in charge of purchasing did not document their procedures. Effect: The Board is not in compliance with the procurement requirements of the grant which could affect future funding. Repeat Finding: This finding was not a finding in FY21. Recommendation: We recommend the grants administrators communicate procurement requirements, including documentation requirements, to purchasing agents in order to avoid future misinterpretations and noncompliance. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The Board will communicate procurement requirements to purchasing agents in order to avoid future misinterpretation and noncompliance. In most instances, evidence of procurement requirement compliance was observed, but not documented appropriately for compliance requirements.
2022-003 Noncompliance with Procurement Requirements Federal Programs: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CFDA No. 21.027) and Special Education (CFDA No.?s 84.027 and 84.173) Criteria: Recipients are required to comply with 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.327, including ensuring that the procurement method used for the contracts are appropriate based on the dollar amount and conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320. The Board follows the Annotated Code of Maryland, the Education Article, and Board Policy DJB with respect to procurement. For purchases between $3,501 and $25,000, two written oral quotes must be acquired. Condition: Seven purchases between $3,501 and $25,000 were noted for which there was not documentation of two quotes or supporting documentation of single sourcing. Cause: The individuals in charge of purchasing did not document their procedures. Effect: The Board is not in compliance with the procurement requirements of the grant which could affect future funding. Repeat Finding: This finding was not a finding in FY21. Recommendation: We recommend the grants administrators communicate procurement requirements, including documentation requirements, to purchasing agents in order to avoid future misinterpretations and noncompliance. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The Board will communicate procurement requirements to purchasing agents in order to avoid future misinterpretation and noncompliance. In most instances, evidence of procurement requirement compliance was observed, but not documented appropriately for compliance requirements.
2022-003 Noncompliance with Procurement Requirements Federal Programs: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CFDA No. 21.027) and Special Education (CFDA No.?s 84.027 and 84.173) Criteria: Recipients are required to comply with 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.327, including ensuring that the procurement method used for the contracts are appropriate based on the dollar amount and conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320. The Board follows the Annotated Code of Maryland, the Education Article, and Board Policy DJB with respect to procurement. For purchases between $3,501 and $25,000, two written oral quotes must be acquired. Condition: Seven purchases between $3,501 and $25,000 were noted for which there was not documentation of two quotes or supporting documentation of single sourcing. Cause: The individuals in charge of purchasing did not document their procedures. Effect: The Board is not in compliance with the procurement requirements of the grant which could affect future funding. Repeat Finding: This finding was not a finding in FY21. Recommendation: We recommend the grants administrators communicate procurement requirements, including documentation requirements, to purchasing agents in order to avoid future misinterpretations and noncompliance. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The Board will communicate procurement requirements to purchasing agents in order to avoid future misinterpretation and noncompliance. In most instances, evidence of procurement requirement compliance was observed, but not documented appropriately for compliance requirements.
2022-003 Noncompliance with Procurement Requirements Federal Programs: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CFDA No. 21.027) and Special Education (CFDA No.?s 84.027 and 84.173) Criteria: Recipients are required to comply with 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.327, including ensuring that the procurement method used for the contracts are appropriate based on the dollar amount and conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320. The Board follows the Annotated Code of Maryland, the Education Article, and Board Policy DJB with respect to procurement. For purchases between $3,501 and $25,000, two written oral quotes must be acquired. Condition: Seven purchases between $3,501 and $25,000 were noted for which there was not documentation of two quotes or supporting documentation of single sourcing. Cause: The individuals in charge of purchasing did not document their procedures. Effect: The Board is not in compliance with the procurement requirements of the grant which could affect future funding. Repeat Finding: This finding was not a finding in FY21. Recommendation: We recommend the grants administrators communicate procurement requirements, including documentation requirements, to purchasing agents in order to avoid future misinterpretations and noncompliance. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The Board will communicate procurement requirements to purchasing agents in order to avoid future misinterpretation and noncompliance. In most instances, evidence of procurement requirement compliance was observed, but not documented appropriately for compliance requirements.
2022-003 Noncompliance with Procurement Requirements Federal Programs: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CFDA No. 21.027) and Special Education (CFDA No.?s 84.027 and 84.173) Criteria: Recipients are required to comply with 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.327, including ensuring that the procurement method used for the contracts are appropriate based on the dollar amount and conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320. The Board follows the Annotated Code of Maryland, the Education Article, and Board Policy DJB with respect to procurement. For purchases between $3,501 and $25,000, two written oral quotes must be acquired. Condition: Seven purchases between $3,501 and $25,000 were noted for which there was not documentation of two quotes or supporting documentation of single sourcing. Cause: The individuals in charge of purchasing did not document their procedures. Effect: The Board is not in compliance with the procurement requirements of the grant which could affect future funding. Repeat Finding: This finding was not a finding in FY21. Recommendation: We recommend the grants administrators communicate procurement requirements, including documentation requirements, to purchasing agents in order to avoid future misinterpretations and noncompliance. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The Board will communicate procurement requirements to purchasing agents in order to avoid future misinterpretation and noncompliance. In most instances, evidence of procurement requirement compliance was observed, but not documented appropriately for compliance requirements.
2022-003 Noncompliance with Procurement Requirements Federal Programs: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CFDA No. 21.027) and Special Education (CFDA No.?s 84.027 and 84.173) Criteria: Recipients are required to comply with 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.327, including ensuring that the procurement method used for the contracts are appropriate based on the dollar amount and conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320. The Board follows the Annotated Code of Maryland, the Education Article, and Board Policy DJB with respect to procurement. For purchases between $3,501 and $25,000, two written oral quotes must be acquired. Condition: Seven purchases between $3,501 and $25,000 were noted for which there was not documentation of two quotes or supporting documentation of single sourcing. Cause: The individuals in charge of purchasing did not document their procedures. Effect: The Board is not in compliance with the procurement requirements of the grant which could affect future funding. Repeat Finding: This finding was not a finding in FY21. Recommendation: We recommend the grants administrators communicate procurement requirements, including documentation requirements, to purchasing agents in order to avoid future misinterpretations and noncompliance. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The Board will communicate procurement requirements to purchasing agents in order to avoid future misinterpretation and noncompliance. In most instances, evidence of procurement requirement compliance was observed, but not documented appropriately for compliance requirements.
2022-003 Noncompliance with Procurement Requirements Federal Programs: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CFDA No. 21.027) and Special Education (CFDA No.?s 84.027 and 84.173) Criteria: Recipients are required to comply with 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.327, including ensuring that the procurement method used for the contracts are appropriate based on the dollar amount and conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320. The Board follows the Annotated Code of Maryland, the Education Article, and Board Policy DJB with respect to procurement. For purchases between $3,501 and $25,000, two written oral quotes must be acquired. Condition: Seven purchases between $3,501 and $25,000 were noted for which there was not documentation of two quotes or supporting documentation of single sourcing. Cause: The individuals in charge of purchasing did not document their procedures. Effect: The Board is not in compliance with the procurement requirements of the grant which could affect future funding. Repeat Finding: This finding was not a finding in FY21. Recommendation: We recommend the grants administrators communicate procurement requirements, including documentation requirements, to purchasing agents in order to avoid future misinterpretations and noncompliance. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The Board will communicate procurement requirements to purchasing agents in order to avoid future misinterpretation and noncompliance. In most instances, evidence of procurement requirement compliance was observed, but not documented appropriately for compliance requirements.
2022-003 Noncompliance with Procurement Requirements Federal Programs: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CFDA No. 21.027) and Special Education (CFDA No.?s 84.027 and 84.173) Criteria: Recipients are required to comply with 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.327, including ensuring that the procurement method used for the contracts are appropriate based on the dollar amount and conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320. The Board follows the Annotated Code of Maryland, the Education Article, and Board Policy DJB with respect to procurement. For purchases between $3,501 and $25,000, two written oral quotes must be acquired. Condition: Seven purchases between $3,501 and $25,000 were noted for which there was not documentation of two quotes or supporting documentation of single sourcing. Cause: The individuals in charge of purchasing did not document their procedures. Effect: The Board is not in compliance with the procurement requirements of the grant which could affect future funding. Repeat Finding: This finding was not a finding in FY21. Recommendation: We recommend the grants administrators communicate procurement requirements, including documentation requirements, to purchasing agents in order to avoid future misinterpretations and noncompliance. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The Board will communicate procurement requirements to purchasing agents in order to avoid future misinterpretation and noncompliance. In most instances, evidence of procurement requirement compliance was observed, but not documented appropriately for compliance requirements.
2022-003 Noncompliance with Procurement Requirements Federal Programs: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CFDA No. 21.027) and Special Education (CFDA No.?s 84.027 and 84.173) Criteria: Recipients are required to comply with 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.327, including ensuring that the procurement method used for the contracts are appropriate based on the dollar amount and conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320. The Board follows the Annotated Code of Maryland, the Education Article, and Board Policy DJB with respect to procurement. For purchases between $3,501 and $25,000, two written oral quotes must be acquired. Condition: Seven purchases between $3,501 and $25,000 were noted for which there was not documentation of two quotes or supporting documentation of single sourcing. Cause: The individuals in charge of purchasing did not document their procedures. Effect: The Board is not in compliance with the procurement requirements of the grant which could affect future funding. Repeat Finding: This finding was not a finding in FY21. Recommendation: We recommend the grants administrators communicate procurement requirements, including documentation requirements, to purchasing agents in order to avoid future misinterpretations and noncompliance. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The Board will communicate procurement requirements to purchasing agents in order to avoid future misinterpretation and noncompliance. In most instances, evidence of procurement requirement compliance was observed, but not documented appropriately for compliance requirements.
2022-003 Noncompliance with Procurement Requirements Federal Programs: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CFDA No. 21.027) and Special Education (CFDA No.?s 84.027 and 84.173) Criteria: Recipients are required to comply with 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.327, including ensuring that the procurement method used for the contracts are appropriate based on the dollar amount and conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320. The Board follows the Annotated Code of Maryland, the Education Article, and Board Policy DJB with respect to procurement. For purchases between $3,501 and $25,000, two written oral quotes must be acquired. Condition: Seven purchases between $3,501 and $25,000 were noted for which there was not documentation of two quotes or supporting documentation of single sourcing. Cause: The individuals in charge of purchasing did not document their procedures. Effect: The Board is not in compliance with the procurement requirements of the grant which could affect future funding. Repeat Finding: This finding was not a finding in FY21. Recommendation: We recommend the grants administrators communicate procurement requirements, including documentation requirements, to purchasing agents in order to avoid future misinterpretations and noncompliance. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The Board will communicate procurement requirements to purchasing agents in order to avoid future misinterpretation and noncompliance. In most instances, evidence of procurement requirement compliance was observed, but not documented appropriately for compliance requirements.
2022-003 Noncompliance with Procurement Requirements Federal Programs: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CFDA No. 21.027) and Special Education (CFDA No.?s 84.027 and 84.173) Criteria: Recipients are required to comply with 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.327, including ensuring that the procurement method used for the contracts are appropriate based on the dollar amount and conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320. The Board follows the Annotated Code of Maryland, the Education Article, and Board Policy DJB with respect to procurement. For purchases between $3,501 and $25,000, two written oral quotes must be acquired. Condition: Seven purchases between $3,501 and $25,000 were noted for which there was not documentation of two quotes or supporting documentation of single sourcing. Cause: The individuals in charge of purchasing did not document their procedures. Effect: The Board is not in compliance with the procurement requirements of the grant which could affect future funding. Repeat Finding: This finding was not a finding in FY21. Recommendation: We recommend the grants administrators communicate procurement requirements, including documentation requirements, to purchasing agents in order to avoid future misinterpretations and noncompliance. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The Board will communicate procurement requirements to purchasing agents in order to avoid future misinterpretation and noncompliance. In most instances, evidence of procurement requirement compliance was observed, but not documented appropriately for compliance requirements.
2022-003 Noncompliance with Procurement Requirements Federal Programs: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CFDA No. 21.027) and Special Education (CFDA No.?s 84.027 and 84.173) Criteria: Recipients are required to comply with 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.327, including ensuring that the procurement method used for the contracts are appropriate based on the dollar amount and conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320. The Board follows the Annotated Code of Maryland, the Education Article, and Board Policy DJB with respect to procurement. For purchases between $3,501 and $25,000, two written oral quotes must be acquired. Condition: Seven purchases between $3,501 and $25,000 were noted for which there was not documentation of two quotes or supporting documentation of single sourcing. Cause: The individuals in charge of purchasing did not document their procedures. Effect: The Board is not in compliance with the procurement requirements of the grant which could affect future funding. Repeat Finding: This finding was not a finding in FY21. Recommendation: We recommend the grants administrators communicate procurement requirements, including documentation requirements, to purchasing agents in order to avoid future misinterpretations and noncompliance. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The Board will communicate procurement requirements to purchasing agents in order to avoid future misinterpretation and noncompliance. In most instances, evidence of procurement requirement compliance was observed, but not documented appropriately for compliance requirements.
2022-003 Noncompliance with Procurement Requirements Federal Programs: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CFDA No. 21.027) and Special Education (CFDA No.?s 84.027 and 84.173) Criteria: Recipients are required to comply with 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.327, including ensuring that the procurement method used for the contracts are appropriate based on the dollar amount and conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320. The Board follows the Annotated Code of Maryland, the Education Article, and Board Policy DJB with respect to procurement. For purchases between $3,501 and $25,000, two written oral quotes must be acquired. Condition: Seven purchases between $3,501 and $25,000 were noted for which there was not documentation of two quotes or supporting documentation of single sourcing. Cause: The individuals in charge of purchasing did not document their procedures. Effect: The Board is not in compliance with the procurement requirements of the grant which could affect future funding. Repeat Finding: This finding was not a finding in FY21. Recommendation: We recommend the grants administrators communicate procurement requirements, including documentation requirements, to purchasing agents in order to avoid future misinterpretations and noncompliance. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The Board will communicate procurement requirements to purchasing agents in order to avoid future misinterpretation and noncompliance. In most instances, evidence of procurement requirement compliance was observed, but not documented appropriately for compliance requirements.
2022-003 Noncompliance with Procurement Requirements Federal Programs: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CFDA No. 21.027) and Special Education (CFDA No.?s 84.027 and 84.173) Criteria: Recipients are required to comply with 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.327, including ensuring that the procurement method used for the contracts are appropriate based on the dollar amount and conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320. The Board follows the Annotated Code of Maryland, the Education Article, and Board Policy DJB with respect to procurement. For purchases between $3,501 and $25,000, two written oral quotes must be acquired. Condition: Seven purchases between $3,501 and $25,000 were noted for which there was not documentation of two quotes or supporting documentation of single sourcing. Cause: The individuals in charge of purchasing did not document their procedures. Effect: The Board is not in compliance with the procurement requirements of the grant which could affect future funding. Repeat Finding: This finding was not a finding in FY21. Recommendation: We recommend the grants administrators communicate procurement requirements, including documentation requirements, to purchasing agents in order to avoid future misinterpretations and noncompliance. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The Board will communicate procurement requirements to purchasing agents in order to avoid future misinterpretation and noncompliance. In most instances, evidence of procurement requirement compliance was observed, but not documented appropriately for compliance requirements.
2022-003 Noncompliance with Procurement Requirements Federal Programs: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CFDA No. 21.027) and Special Education (CFDA No.?s 84.027 and 84.173) Criteria: Recipients are required to comply with 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.327, including ensuring that the procurement method used for the contracts are appropriate based on the dollar amount and conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320. The Board follows the Annotated Code of Maryland, the Education Article, and Board Policy DJB with respect to procurement. For purchases between $3,501 and $25,000, two written oral quotes must be acquired. Condition: Seven purchases between $3,501 and $25,000 were noted for which there was not documentation of two quotes or supporting documentation of single sourcing. Cause: The individuals in charge of purchasing did not document their procedures. Effect: The Board is not in compliance with the procurement requirements of the grant which could affect future funding. Repeat Finding: This finding was not a finding in FY21. Recommendation: We recommend the grants administrators communicate procurement requirements, including documentation requirements, to purchasing agents in order to avoid future misinterpretations and noncompliance. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The Board will communicate procurement requirements to purchasing agents in order to avoid future misinterpretation and noncompliance. In most instances, evidence of procurement requirement compliance was observed, but not documented appropriately for compliance requirements.
2022-003 Noncompliance with Procurement Requirements Federal Programs: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CFDA No. 21.027) and Special Education (CFDA No.?s 84.027 and 84.173) Criteria: Recipients are required to comply with 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.327, including ensuring that the procurement method used for the contracts are appropriate based on the dollar amount and conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320. The Board follows the Annotated Code of Maryland, the Education Article, and Board Policy DJB with respect to procurement. For purchases between $3,501 and $25,000, two written oral quotes must be acquired. Condition: Seven purchases between $3,501 and $25,000 were noted for which there was not documentation of two quotes or supporting documentation of single sourcing. Cause: The individuals in charge of purchasing did not document their procedures. Effect: The Board is not in compliance with the procurement requirements of the grant which could affect future funding. Repeat Finding: This finding was not a finding in FY21. Recommendation: We recommend the grants administrators communicate procurement requirements, including documentation requirements, to purchasing agents in order to avoid future misinterpretations and noncompliance. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The Board will communicate procurement requirements to purchasing agents in order to avoid future misinterpretation and noncompliance. In most instances, evidence of procurement requirement compliance was observed, but not documented appropriately for compliance requirements.
2022-003 Noncompliance with Procurement Requirements Federal Programs: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CFDA No. 21.027) and Special Education (CFDA No.?s 84.027 and 84.173) Criteria: Recipients are required to comply with 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.327, including ensuring that the procurement method used for the contracts are appropriate based on the dollar amount and conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320. The Board follows the Annotated Code of Maryland, the Education Article, and Board Policy DJB with respect to procurement. For purchases between $3,501 and $25,000, two written oral quotes must be acquired. Condition: Seven purchases between $3,501 and $25,000 were noted for which there was not documentation of two quotes or supporting documentation of single sourcing. Cause: The individuals in charge of purchasing did not document their procedures. Effect: The Board is not in compliance with the procurement requirements of the grant which could affect future funding. Repeat Finding: This finding was not a finding in FY21. Recommendation: We recommend the grants administrators communicate procurement requirements, including documentation requirements, to purchasing agents in order to avoid future misinterpretations and noncompliance. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The Board will communicate procurement requirements to purchasing agents in order to avoid future misinterpretation and noncompliance. In most instances, evidence of procurement requirement compliance was observed, but not documented appropriately for compliance requirements.
2022-003 Noncompliance with Procurement Requirements Federal Programs: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CFDA No. 21.027) and Special Education (CFDA No.?s 84.027 and 84.173) Criteria: Recipients are required to comply with 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.327, including ensuring that the procurement method used for the contracts are appropriate based on the dollar amount and conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320. The Board follows the Annotated Code of Maryland, the Education Article, and Board Policy DJB with respect to procurement. For purchases between $3,501 and $25,000, two written oral quotes must be acquired. Condition: Seven purchases between $3,501 and $25,000 were noted for which there was not documentation of two quotes or supporting documentation of single sourcing. Cause: The individuals in charge of purchasing did not document their procedures. Effect: The Board is not in compliance with the procurement requirements of the grant which could affect future funding. Repeat Finding: This finding was not a finding in FY21. Recommendation: We recommend the grants administrators communicate procurement requirements, including documentation requirements, to purchasing agents in order to avoid future misinterpretations and noncompliance. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The Board will communicate procurement requirements to purchasing agents in order to avoid future misinterpretation and noncompliance. In most instances, evidence of procurement requirement compliance was observed, but not documented appropriately for compliance requirements.
2022-003 Noncompliance with Procurement Requirements Federal Programs: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CFDA No. 21.027) and Special Education (CFDA No.?s 84.027 and 84.173) Criteria: Recipients are required to comply with 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.327, including ensuring that the procurement method used for the contracts are appropriate based on the dollar amount and conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320. The Board follows the Annotated Code of Maryland, the Education Article, and Board Policy DJB with respect to procurement. For purchases between $3,501 and $25,000, two written oral quotes must be acquired. Condition: Seven purchases between $3,501 and $25,000 were noted for which there was not documentation of two quotes or supporting documentation of single sourcing. Cause: The individuals in charge of purchasing did not document their procedures. Effect: The Board is not in compliance with the procurement requirements of the grant which could affect future funding. Repeat Finding: This finding was not a finding in FY21. Recommendation: We recommend the grants administrators communicate procurement requirements, including documentation requirements, to purchasing agents in order to avoid future misinterpretations and noncompliance. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The Board will communicate procurement requirements to purchasing agents in order to avoid future misinterpretation and noncompliance. In most instances, evidence of procurement requirement compliance was observed, but not documented appropriately for compliance requirements.
Information on the Federal Program U.S. Department of Education ? Passed-through New Jersey Department of Education: Education Stabilization Fund (ESF): ESSER ? CARES Emergency Relief Grant Assistance Listing No. 84.425 3/13/2020 ? 9/30/2022 ESSER II Assistance Listing No. 84.425 3/13/2020 ? 9/30/2023 ESSER ? American Rescue Plan Assistance Listing No. 84.425 3/13/2020 ? 9/30/2024 Homeless II ? American Rescue Plan Assistance Listing No. 84.425 4/23/2021 ? 9/30/2023 Criteria or Specific Requirement Per 2 CFR ? 200.320 under Part 200 of the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards dictates when the value of procurement for property or services exceed the simplified acquisition threshold or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity (State of New Jersey), formal procurement methods are required. Condition The School District did not provide evidence that it was in compliance with formal procurement methods. Questioned Costs Unknown. Context Two (2) purchases made by the School District in excess of the procurement threshold established by a non-Federal entity (State of New Jersey) did not have supporting documentation available to verify compliance with formal procurement methods. Effect or Potential Effect The School District was not in compliance with 2 CFR ? 200.320 under Part 200 of the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards. Cause Unknown. Identification as a Repeat Finding See Finding 2021-004. Recommendation That the School District retain evidence that it complied with formal procurement methods as noted in 2 CFR ? 200.320 under Part 200 of the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards. View of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action The responsible officials agree with the finding and will address the matter as part of their corrective action plan.
Finding Number: 2022-002 Assistance Listing Number and Title: AL #84.027, #84.173 Special Education Cluster Federal Award Identification Number/ Year: 2022/2023 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Pass-Through Entity: Ohio Department of Education Repeat Finding from Prior Audit? No Ohio Rev. Code ?? 3313.843 and 3313.845 allow traditional schools to contract with Educational Service Centers (ESCs) to provide services as outlined in the agreement between the two parties. Ohio Rev. Code ?3313.843(C) requires these agreements to be filed with the Ohio Department of Education by the first day of July of the school year for which the agreement is in effect. Effective on December 26, 2014, 2 CFR ? 200.320 outlined the methods of procurement to be followed by state subrecipient non-Federal entities when expending certain types of Federal funds, including those received through Grant Agreements. However, 2 CFR ? 200.110(a), created a ?grace period? for compliance with 2 CFR ?200.320, by permitting non-Federal entities to comply with previously issued Office of Management and Budget procurement guidance for all fiscal years beginning prior to December 26, 2017. In January 2020, the Ohio Department of Education (ODE) published a form that allows schools to request ODE authorize a noncompetitive proposal for their ESC Services. This form is available on ODE?s website. During the fiscal year, the School District contracted with Allen County Educational Service Center (ESC) to provide purchased services. These services included expenditures of $46,283, which were paid for out of the Special Education Cluster Grants and subject to the Federal procurement laws. The School District did not complete the form that allows schools to request ODE authorize a noncompetitive proposal for their ESC Services that is available on the ODE website. Under 2 CFR ?200.320 the School District should have competitively bid the services needed or obtained price quotes from qualified sources as further defined in the School District?s procurement policy. The School District should develop a control(s) and/or procedure(s) to verify that established procurement procedures are followed when entering into contracts using Federal monies. The ODE form that allows schools to request ODE authorize a noncompetitive proposal for their ESC Services should be utilized for any ESC contract in the future. Failure to follow proper procurement procedures could result in contracts awarded to entities which do not meet all the needs of the School District or have a cost significantly higher than their competitors, as well as a loss in future federal funding and possible questioned costs in future audits.
Finding Number: 2022-002 Assistance Listing Number and Title: AL #84.027, #84.173 Special Education Cluster Federal Award Identification Number/ Year: 2022/2023 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Pass-Through Entity: Ohio Department of Education Repeat Finding from Prior Audit? No Ohio Rev. Code ?? 3313.843 and 3313.845 allow traditional schools to contract with Educational Service Centers (ESCs) to provide services as outlined in the agreement between the two parties. Ohio Rev. Code ?3313.843(C) requires these agreements to be filed with the Ohio Department of Education by the first day of July of the school year for which the agreement is in effect. Effective on December 26, 2014, 2 CFR ? 200.320 outlined the methods of procurement to be followed by state subrecipient non-Federal entities when expending certain types of Federal funds, including those received through Grant Agreements. However, 2 CFR ? 200.110(a), created a ?grace period? for compliance with 2 CFR ?200.320, by permitting non-Federal entities to comply with previously issued Office of Management and Budget procurement guidance for all fiscal years beginning prior to December 26, 2017. In January 2020, the Ohio Department of Education (ODE) published a form that allows schools to request ODE authorize a noncompetitive proposal for their ESC Services. This form is available on ODE?s website. During the fiscal year, the School District contracted with Allen County Educational Service Center (ESC) to provide purchased services. These services included expenditures of $46,283, which were paid for out of the Special Education Cluster Grants and subject to the Federal procurement laws. The School District did not complete the form that allows schools to request ODE authorize a noncompetitive proposal for their ESC Services that is available on the ODE website. Under 2 CFR ?200.320 the School District should have competitively bid the services needed or obtained price quotes from qualified sources as further defined in the School District?s procurement policy. The School District should develop a control(s) and/or procedure(s) to verify that established procurement procedures are followed when entering into contracts using Federal monies. The ODE form that allows schools to request ODE authorize a noncompetitive proposal for their ESC Services should be utilized for any ESC contract in the future. Failure to follow proper procurement procedures could result in contracts awarded to entities which do not meet all the needs of the School District or have a cost significantly higher than their competitors, as well as a loss in future federal funding and possible questioned costs in future audits.
Program: COVID-19 ? Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases, (ELC) Federal Financial Assistance Listing No.: 93.323 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Passed-through: California Department of Public Health Award Year: 2021-2022 Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Grant Award Number: COVID-19 ELC39 and COVID-19 ELC97 Type of Finding: Material Noncompliance, Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria: Procurement: Per 2 CFR part 200, subpart D, section 200.303, the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award is compliance with federal statues, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-federal entity must: ? Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors? performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. ? Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. ? Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). Under the micro-purchase method, the aggregate dollar amount does not exceed $10,000 ($2,000 in the case of acquisition for construction subject to the Wage Rate Requirements [Davis-Bacon Act]). Small purchase procedures are used for purchases that exceed the micro-purchase amount but do not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold ($250,000). Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive quotations if the non-federal entity considers the price to be reasonable (2 CFR section 200.320(a)). If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources (2 CFR section 200.320(b)). ? For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). ? Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(b)). ? Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, ?Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.? Suspension and Debarment: Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. ?Covered transactions? include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. When a non-federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the non-federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. This verification may be accomplished by (1) checking the System for Award Management (SAM) Exclusions maintained by the General Services Administration (GSA) and available at SAM.gov/Home, (2) collecting a certification from the entity, or (3) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that entity (2 CFR section 180.300). Condition Found: As a result of our audit procedures, we noted the following: Procurement: ? 4 out of 8 transactions tested did not have documentation that full and open competition, price analysis, or rationale to limit competition in those cases where competition was limited. ? 2 out of 8 transactions tested did not have documentation of the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, basis for contractor selection and the basis for the contract price in accordance with the Uniform Guidance, section 318(i) and 48 CFR part 44 and section 52.244-2. ? 8 out of 8 did not include the applicable provisions required by Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200. Suspension and Debarment: ? 6 out of 8 covered transactions tested did not have evidence that management checked for suspension and debarment during the scope of this audit; by management either not verifying the SAM?s.gov website, not obtaining a certification, or not adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction. Cause: Not following the County?s own official policies and procedures over procurement and suspension and debarment. Effect: Not following the County?s procurement policies and procedures that are in place and required by the Uniform Guidance resulted in noncompliance with the requirements of the program. Questioned Costs: None reported. Context/Sampling: A nonstatistical sample of 8 vendor contracts from a population of 38 were tested totaling $1,670,639 out of $9,5334,251 of federal program expenditures. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): Yes, prior year finding 2021-009. Recommendation: We recommend that the County enforce its official policies and procedures over procurement and suspension and debarment. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees. See separate corrective action plan.
Program: COVID-19 ? Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases, (ELC) Federal Financial Assistance Listing No.: 93.323 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Passed-through: California Department of Public Health Award Year: 2021-2022 Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Grant Award Number: COVID-19 ELC39 and COVID-19 ELC97 Type of Finding: Material Noncompliance, Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria: Procurement: Per 2 CFR part 200, subpart D, section 200.303, the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award is compliance with federal statues, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-federal entity must: ? Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors? performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. ? Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. ? Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). Under the micro-purchase method, the aggregate dollar amount does not exceed $10,000 ($2,000 in the case of acquisition for construction subject to the Wage Rate Requirements [Davis-Bacon Act]). Small purchase procedures are used for purchases that exceed the micro-purchase amount but do not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold ($250,000). Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive quotations if the non-federal entity considers the price to be reasonable (2 CFR section 200.320(a)). If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources (2 CFR section 200.320(b)). ? For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). ? Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(b)). ? Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, ?Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.? Suspension and Debarment: Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. ?Covered transactions? include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. When a non-federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the non-federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. This verification may be accomplished by (1) checking the System for Award Management (SAM) Exclusions maintained by the General Services Administration (GSA) and available at SAM.gov/Home, (2) collecting a certification from the entity, or (3) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that entity (2 CFR section 180.300). Condition Found: As a result of our audit procedures, we noted the following: Procurement: ? 4 out of 8 transactions tested did not have documentation that full and open competition, price analysis, or rationale to limit competition in those cases where competition was limited. ? 2 out of 8 transactions tested did not have documentation of the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, basis for contractor selection and the basis for the contract price in accordance with the Uniform Guidance, section 318(i) and 48 CFR part 44 and section 52.244-2. ? 8 out of 8 did not include the applicable provisions required by Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200. Suspension and Debarment: ? 6 out of 8 covered transactions tested did not have evidence that management checked for suspension and debarment during the scope of this audit; by management either not verifying the SAM?s.gov website, not obtaining a certification, or not adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction. Cause: Not following the County?s own official policies and procedures over procurement and suspension and debarment. Effect: Not following the County?s procurement policies and procedures that are in place and required by the Uniform Guidance resulted in noncompliance with the requirements of the program. Questioned Costs: None reported. Context/Sampling: A nonstatistical sample of 8 vendor contracts from a population of 38 were tested totaling $1,670,639 out of $9,5334,251 of federal program expenditures. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): Yes, prior year finding 2021-009. Recommendation: We recommend that the County enforce its official policies and procedures over procurement and suspension and debarment. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees. See separate corrective action plan.
Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, COVID-19 National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): SY 2020-2021, SY 2021-2022 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context An effective system of internal controls was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Federal regulations require formal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), which is customarily set at $250,000. However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold of $150,000 and provides that the proper purchasing method for supplies over $150,000 would be the bidding process, unless the purchase meets certain other qualifications. Indiana Code also states that purchase requirements may not be artificially divided to qualify as a purchase under $150,000. Sealed bids or competitive proposals were not obtained from an adequate number of sources for one of two vendors that exceeded the simplified acquisition threshold. Additionally, the School Corporation did not verify that two of four vendors were neither suspended nor debarred, or otherwise excluded or disqualified from participating in federal assistance programs. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." SCHOOL TOWN OF MUNSTER SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 2 CFR 200.320(b) states in part: "Formal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under the Federal financial assistance award exceeds the SAT, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a non-competitive procurement can be used in accordance with ? 200.319 or paragraph (c) of this section. The following formal methods of procurement are used for procurement of property or services above the simplified acquisition threshold or a value below the simplified acquisition threshold the non-Federal entity determines to be appropriate: (1) Sealed bids. . . . (ii) If sealed bids are used the following requirements apply: (A) Bids must be solicited from an adequate number of qualified sources . . . (2) Proposals. . . . (i) Requests for proposals must be publicized and identify all evaluation factors and their relative importance. Proposals must be solicited from an adequate number qualified offerors. . . ." 2 CFR 200.320(c) states: "Noncompetitive procurement. There are specific circumstances in which noncompetitive pro-curement can be used. Noncompetitive procurement can only be awarded if one or more of the following circumstances apply: (1) The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold (see paragraph (a)(1) of this section); (2) The item is available only from a single source; (3) The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from publicizing a competitive solicitation; (4) The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity expressly authorizes a noncom-petitive procurement in response to a written request from the non-Federal entity; or (5) After solicitation of a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." SCHOOL TOWN OF MUNSTER SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Indiana Code 5-22-8-1 states: "(a) This chapter applies only to a purchase expected by the purchasing agent to be less than one hundred fifty thousand dollars ($150,000). (b) Purchase requirements may not be artificially divided so as to constitute a small purchase under this chapter." Cause Management had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Effect The failure to establish an effective system of internal controls enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funding to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure compliance and comply with the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compli-ance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report. Auditor's Response When the acquisition of the supplies or services, in the aggregate, are less than the simplified acquisition threshold, set at $150,000, informal procurement methods are allowable. One check was issued to a vendor in the amount of $232,761 for equipment purchased by the School Corporation and installed in a number of school buildings. As the amount spent with the vendor in question was over the simplified acquisition threshold, formal procurement methods should have been utilized. Formal procurement methods would have entailed obtaining sealed bids for the equipment and installation and the awarding of a contract. The award of a contract over $25,000 would have also required the vendor to be verified to ensure that the vendor itself was not excluded or disqualified from participating in federal assistance programs. If the vendor had been excluded or disqualified, federal funds should not have been used to pay the vendor.
Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, COVID-19 National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): SY 2020-2021, SY 2021-2022 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context An effective system of internal controls was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Federal regulations require formal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), which is customarily set at $250,000. However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold of $150,000 and provides that the proper purchasing method for supplies over $150,000 would be the bidding process, unless the purchase meets certain other qualifications. Indiana Code also states that purchase requirements may not be artificially divided to qualify as a purchase under $150,000. Sealed bids or competitive proposals were not obtained from an adequate number of sources for one of two vendors that exceeded the simplified acquisition threshold. Additionally, the School Corporation did not verify that two of four vendors were neither suspended nor debarred, or otherwise excluded or disqualified from participating in federal assistance programs. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." SCHOOL TOWN OF MUNSTER SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 2 CFR 200.320(b) states in part: "Formal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under the Federal financial assistance award exceeds the SAT, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a non-competitive procurement can be used in accordance with ? 200.319 or paragraph (c) of this section. The following formal methods of procurement are used for procurement of property or services above the simplified acquisition threshold or a value below the simplified acquisition threshold the non-Federal entity determines to be appropriate: (1) Sealed bids. . . . (ii) If sealed bids are used the following requirements apply: (A) Bids must be solicited from an adequate number of qualified sources . . . (2) Proposals. . . . (i) Requests for proposals must be publicized and identify all evaluation factors and their relative importance. Proposals must be solicited from an adequate number qualified offerors. . . ." 2 CFR 200.320(c) states: "Noncompetitive procurement. There are specific circumstances in which noncompetitive pro-curement can be used. Noncompetitive procurement can only be awarded if one or more of the following circumstances apply: (1) The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold (see paragraph (a)(1) of this section); (2) The item is available only from a single source; (3) The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from publicizing a competitive solicitation; (4) The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity expressly authorizes a noncom-petitive procurement in response to a written request from the non-Federal entity; or (5) After solicitation of a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." SCHOOL TOWN OF MUNSTER SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Indiana Code 5-22-8-1 states: "(a) This chapter applies only to a purchase expected by the purchasing agent to be less than one hundred fifty thousand dollars ($150,000). (b) Purchase requirements may not be artificially divided so as to constitute a small purchase under this chapter." Cause Management had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Effect The failure to establish an effective system of internal controls enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funding to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure compliance and comply with the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compli-ance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report. Auditor's Response When the acquisition of the supplies or services, in the aggregate, are less than the simplified acquisition threshold, set at $150,000, informal procurement methods are allowable. One check was issued to a vendor in the amount of $232,761 for equipment purchased by the School Corporation and installed in a number of school buildings. As the amount spent with the vendor in question was over the simplified acquisition threshold, formal procurement methods should have been utilized. Formal procurement methods would have entailed obtaining sealed bids for the equipment and installation and the awarding of a contract. The award of a contract over $25,000 would have also required the vendor to be verified to ensure that the vendor itself was not excluded or disqualified from participating in federal assistance programs. If the vendor had been excluded or disqualified, federal funds should not have been used to pay the vendor.
Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, COVID-19 National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): SY 2020-2021, SY 2021-2022 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context An effective system of internal controls was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Federal regulations require formal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), which is customarily set at $250,000. However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold of $150,000 and provides that the proper purchasing method for supplies over $150,000 would be the bidding process, unless the purchase meets certain other qualifications. Indiana Code also states that purchase requirements may not be artificially divided to qualify as a purchase under $150,000. Sealed bids or competitive proposals were not obtained from an adequate number of sources for one of two vendors that exceeded the simplified acquisition threshold. Additionally, the School Corporation did not verify that two of four vendors were neither suspended nor debarred, or otherwise excluded or disqualified from participating in federal assistance programs. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." SCHOOL TOWN OF MUNSTER SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 2 CFR 200.320(b) states in part: "Formal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under the Federal financial assistance award exceeds the SAT, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a non-competitive procurement can be used in accordance with ? 200.319 or paragraph (c) of this section. The following formal methods of procurement are used for procurement of property or services above the simplified acquisition threshold or a value below the simplified acquisition threshold the non-Federal entity determines to be appropriate: (1) Sealed bids. . . . (ii) If sealed bids are used the following requirements apply: (A) Bids must be solicited from an adequate number of qualified sources . . . (2) Proposals. . . . (i) Requests for proposals must be publicized and identify all evaluation factors and their relative importance. Proposals must be solicited from an adequate number qualified offerors. . . ." 2 CFR 200.320(c) states: "Noncompetitive procurement. There are specific circumstances in which noncompetitive pro-curement can be used. Noncompetitive procurement can only be awarded if one or more of the following circumstances apply: (1) The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold (see paragraph (a)(1) of this section); (2) The item is available only from a single source; (3) The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from publicizing a competitive solicitation; (4) The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity expressly authorizes a noncom-petitive procurement in response to a written request from the non-Federal entity; or (5) After solicitation of a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." SCHOOL TOWN OF MUNSTER SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Indiana Code 5-22-8-1 states: "(a) This chapter applies only to a purchase expected by the purchasing agent to be less than one hundred fifty thousand dollars ($150,000). (b) Purchase requirements may not be artificially divided so as to constitute a small purchase under this chapter." Cause Management had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Effect The failure to establish an effective system of internal controls enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funding to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure compliance and comply with the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compli-ance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report. Auditor's Response When the acquisition of the supplies or services, in the aggregate, are less than the simplified acquisition threshold, set at $150,000, informal procurement methods are allowable. One check was issued to a vendor in the amount of $232,761 for equipment purchased by the School Corporation and installed in a number of school buildings. As the amount spent with the vendor in question was over the simplified acquisition threshold, formal procurement methods should have been utilized. Formal procurement methods would have entailed obtaining sealed bids for the equipment and installation and the awarding of a contract. The award of a contract over $25,000 would have also required the vendor to be verified to ensure that the vendor itself was not excluded or disqualified from participating in federal assistance programs. If the vendor had been excluded or disqualified, federal funds should not have been used to pay the vendor.
Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, COVID-19 National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): SY 2020-2021, SY 2021-2022 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context An effective system of internal controls was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Federal regulations require formal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), which is customarily set at $250,000. However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold of $150,000 and provides that the proper purchasing method for supplies over $150,000 would be the bidding process, unless the purchase meets certain other qualifications. Indiana Code also states that purchase requirements may not be artificially divided to qualify as a purchase under $150,000. Sealed bids or competitive proposals were not obtained from an adequate number of sources for one of two vendors that exceeded the simplified acquisition threshold. Additionally, the School Corporation did not verify that two of four vendors were neither suspended nor debarred, or otherwise excluded or disqualified from participating in federal assistance programs. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." SCHOOL TOWN OF MUNSTER SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 2 CFR 200.320(b) states in part: "Formal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under the Federal financial assistance award exceeds the SAT, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a non-competitive procurement can be used in accordance with ? 200.319 or paragraph (c) of this section. The following formal methods of procurement are used for procurement of property or services above the simplified acquisition threshold or a value below the simplified acquisition threshold the non-Federal entity determines to be appropriate: (1) Sealed bids. . . . (ii) If sealed bids are used the following requirements apply: (A) Bids must be solicited from an adequate number of qualified sources . . . (2) Proposals. . . . (i) Requests for proposals must be publicized and identify all evaluation factors and their relative importance. Proposals must be solicited from an adequate number qualified offerors. . . ." 2 CFR 200.320(c) states: "Noncompetitive procurement. There are specific circumstances in which noncompetitive pro-curement can be used. Noncompetitive procurement can only be awarded if one or more of the following circumstances apply: (1) The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold (see paragraph (a)(1) of this section); (2) The item is available only from a single source; (3) The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from publicizing a competitive solicitation; (4) The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity expressly authorizes a noncom-petitive procurement in response to a written request from the non-Federal entity; or (5) After solicitation of a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." SCHOOL TOWN OF MUNSTER SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Indiana Code 5-22-8-1 states: "(a) This chapter applies only to a purchase expected by the purchasing agent to be less than one hundred fifty thousand dollars ($150,000). (b) Purchase requirements may not be artificially divided so as to constitute a small purchase under this chapter." Cause Management had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Effect The failure to establish an effective system of internal controls enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funding to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure compliance and comply with the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compli-ance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report. Auditor's Response When the acquisition of the supplies or services, in the aggregate, are less than the simplified acquisition threshold, set at $150,000, informal procurement methods are allowable. One check was issued to a vendor in the amount of $232,761 for equipment purchased by the School Corporation and installed in a number of school buildings. As the amount spent with the vendor in question was over the simplified acquisition threshold, formal procurement methods should have been utilized. Formal procurement methods would have entailed obtaining sealed bids for the equipment and installation and the awarding of a contract. The award of a contract over $25,000 would have also required the vendor to be verified to ensure that the vendor itself was not excluded or disqualified from participating in federal assistance programs. If the vendor had been excluded or disqualified, federal funds should not have been used to pay the vendor.
Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, COVID-19 National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): SY 2020-2021, SY 2021-2022 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context An effective system of internal controls was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Federal regulations require formal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), which is customarily set at $250,000. However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold of $150,000 and provides that the proper purchasing method for supplies over $150,000 would be the bidding process, unless the purchase meets certain other qualifications. Indiana Code also states that purchase requirements may not be artificially divided to qualify as a purchase under $150,000. Sealed bids or competitive proposals were not obtained from an adequate number of sources for one of two vendors that exceeded the simplified acquisition threshold. Additionally, the School Corporation did not verify that two of four vendors were neither suspended nor debarred, or otherwise excluded or disqualified from participating in federal assistance programs. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." SCHOOL TOWN OF MUNSTER SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 2 CFR 200.320(b) states in part: "Formal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under the Federal financial assistance award exceeds the SAT, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a non-competitive procurement can be used in accordance with ? 200.319 or paragraph (c) of this section. The following formal methods of procurement are used for procurement of property or services above the simplified acquisition threshold or a value below the simplified acquisition threshold the non-Federal entity determines to be appropriate: (1) Sealed bids. . . . (ii) If sealed bids are used the following requirements apply: (A) Bids must be solicited from an adequate number of qualified sources . . . (2) Proposals. . . . (i) Requests for proposals must be publicized and identify all evaluation factors and their relative importance. Proposals must be solicited from an adequate number qualified offerors. . . ." 2 CFR 200.320(c) states: "Noncompetitive procurement. There are specific circumstances in which noncompetitive pro-curement can be used. Noncompetitive procurement can only be awarded if one or more of the following circumstances apply: (1) The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold (see paragraph (a)(1) of this section); (2) The item is available only from a single source; (3) The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from publicizing a competitive solicitation; (4) The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity expressly authorizes a noncom-petitive procurement in response to a written request from the non-Federal entity; or (5) After solicitation of a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." SCHOOL TOWN OF MUNSTER SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Indiana Code 5-22-8-1 states: "(a) This chapter applies only to a purchase expected by the purchasing agent to be less than one hundred fifty thousand dollars ($150,000). (b) Purchase requirements may not be artificially divided so as to constitute a small purchase under this chapter." Cause Management had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Effect The failure to establish an effective system of internal controls enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funding to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure compliance and comply with the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compli-ance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report. Auditor's Response When the acquisition of the supplies or services, in the aggregate, are less than the simplified acquisition threshold, set at $150,000, informal procurement methods are allowable. One check was issued to a vendor in the amount of $232,761 for equipment purchased by the School Corporation and installed in a number of school buildings. As the amount spent with the vendor in question was over the simplified acquisition threshold, formal procurement methods should have been utilized. Formal procurement methods would have entailed obtaining sealed bids for the equipment and installation and the awarding of a contract. The award of a contract over $25,000 would have also required the vendor to be verified to ensure that the vendor itself was not excluded or disqualified from participating in federal assistance programs. If the vendor had been excluded or disqualified, federal funds should not have been used to pay the vendor.
Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, COVID-19 National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): SY 2020-2021, SY 2021-2022 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context An effective system of internal controls was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Federal regulations require formal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), which is customarily set at $250,000. However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold of $150,000 and provides that the proper purchasing method for supplies over $150,000 would be the bidding process, unless the purchase meets certain other qualifications. Indiana Code also states that purchase requirements may not be artificially divided to qualify as a purchase under $150,000. Sealed bids or competitive proposals were not obtained from an adequate number of sources for one of two vendors that exceeded the simplified acquisition threshold. Additionally, the School Corporation did not verify that two of four vendors were neither suspended nor debarred, or otherwise excluded or disqualified from participating in federal assistance programs. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." SCHOOL TOWN OF MUNSTER SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 2 CFR 200.320(b) states in part: "Formal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under the Federal financial assistance award exceeds the SAT, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a non-competitive procurement can be used in accordance with ? 200.319 or paragraph (c) of this section. The following formal methods of procurement are used for procurement of property or services above the simplified acquisition threshold or a value below the simplified acquisition threshold the non-Federal entity determines to be appropriate: (1) Sealed bids. . . . (ii) If sealed bids are used the following requirements apply: (A) Bids must be solicited from an adequate number of qualified sources . . . (2) Proposals. . . . (i) Requests for proposals must be publicized and identify all evaluation factors and their relative importance. Proposals must be solicited from an adequate number qualified offerors. . . ." 2 CFR 200.320(c) states: "Noncompetitive procurement. There are specific circumstances in which noncompetitive pro-curement can be used. Noncompetitive procurement can only be awarded if one or more of the following circumstances apply: (1) The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold (see paragraph (a)(1) of this section); (2) The item is available only from a single source; (3) The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from publicizing a competitive solicitation; (4) The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity expressly authorizes a noncom-petitive procurement in response to a written request from the non-Federal entity; or (5) After solicitation of a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." SCHOOL TOWN OF MUNSTER SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Indiana Code 5-22-8-1 states: "(a) This chapter applies only to a purchase expected by the purchasing agent to be less than one hundred fifty thousand dollars ($150,000). (b) Purchase requirements may not be artificially divided so as to constitute a small purchase under this chapter." Cause Management had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Effect The failure to establish an effective system of internal controls enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funding to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure compliance and comply with the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compli-ance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report. Auditor's Response When the acquisition of the supplies or services, in the aggregate, are less than the simplified acquisition threshold, set at $150,000, informal procurement methods are allowable. One check was issued to a vendor in the amount of $232,761 for equipment purchased by the School Corporation and installed in a number of school buildings. As the amount spent with the vendor in question was over the simplified acquisition threshold, formal procurement methods should have been utilized. Formal procurement methods would have entailed obtaining sealed bids for the equipment and installation and the awarding of a contract. The award of a contract over $25,000 would have also required the vendor to be verified to ensure that the vendor itself was not excluded or disqualified from participating in federal assistance programs. If the vendor had been excluded or disqualified, federal funds should not have been used to pay the vendor.
FINDING 2022-002, 2021-001 ? REPEAT FINDING Information on the Federal Program: Federal Agencies: U.S. Department of Education Federal Programs: 84.027/84.173 Special Education Cluster (IDEA) 84.377 School Improvement Grants (Title 1003a IL-Empower) 93.323 Epidemiology and Lab Capacity (ELC) Pass-Through Entity: Illinois State Board of Education; City of Chicago Department of Public Health (CDPH) Pass-Through Entity Award Numbers: H027A210072; S377A160014 Criteria: Procurement Standards of Title 2 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Costs Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) state that all non-federal entities will follow Sections 200.318 through Section 200.327. A. Section 200.320 identifies five methods of procurement to be followed: a. Informal ? micro-purchases b. Informal ? small purchases c. Formal ? sealed bids d. Formal ? competitive proposals e. Noncompetitive proposals Section 200.318 states that non-federal entities must have and use documented procurement procedures that are consistent with State and local laws in addition to the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. B. Per Section 200.320(b) if small purchases are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. C. Title 2 CFR section 200.303 states the following regarding internal control: ?The auditee shall maintain internal control over Federal programs that provides reasonable assurance that the auditee is managing Federal awards in compliance with law, regulations, and the provisions of contracts or grant agreements that could have a material effect on each of its Federal programs.? D. The Chicago Public Schools Procurement Manual requires the collection of three quotes for any purchase between $2,000.01 and $25,000 for any purchase with federal grant funds. Condition/Context: For the three programs referenced, we tested one-hundred and five (105) purchase orders totaling $31,156,308. Thirty-four (34) purchase orders totaling $523,384 were purchases greater than $2,000 but less than $25,000, and for which CPS did not obtain and/or document an adequate number of price or rate quotations as required by CPS? procurement policies. Our samples were not statistically valid. Cause: CPS employees at the program/school level may not be following the CPS Procurement Manual due to the decentralized nature of the process and the high number of purchases that can fall under the $2,000.01-$25,000 threshold. Questioned Costs: Questioned costs, if any, are unable to be determined, however, actual purchase orders that did not comply with the small purchase requirements of the CPS Policy Manual totaled $133,788 for Assistance Listing Number 84.027/84.173, $376,459 for Assistance Listing Number 84.377, and $13,137 for Assistance Listing Number 93.323. Effect: Chicago Public Schools did not document compliance with the requirements of the CPS Policy Manual as it relates to small purchases that fall between $2,000.01 and $25,000. Recommendation: We recommend that CPS communicate and re-enforce its procurement policies and procedures and any changes thereto in order to comply with the purchase requirements of the CPS Procurement Manual. Ensure proper communication is delivered to relevant employees regarding any changes to the CPS Procurement Manual and the CPS Procurement Manual. In addition, we recommend the consideration of implementing a system control that requires the recording of three quotes for purchases between $2,000.01 and $25,000. The system may be the permanent record. Views of Responsible Officials: Based on the prior year recommendation to the FY21 finding, dated December 15, 2021, in April, 2022, CPS revised the policies in the Procurement Manual to reflect the current standard. The Oracle procurement module was tested and upgraded to implement further controls to require the collection of three quotes for any purchase using federal grant funds between $2,000.01 and $25,000 in value. In addition, communication and reenforcement of the procurement policies in the CPS Procurement Manual at the program and school level has been completed through the mandatory training and district wide announcement. On May 9, 2022, US department of Education issued the determination letter concluding this finding resolved and closed.
FINDING 2022-002, 2021-001 ? REPEAT FINDING Information on the Federal Program: Federal Agencies: U.S. Department of Education Federal Programs: 84.027/84.173 Special Education Cluster (IDEA) 84.377 School Improvement Grants (Title 1003a IL-Empower) 93.323 Epidemiology and Lab Capacity (ELC) Pass-Through Entity: Illinois State Board of Education; City of Chicago Department of Public Health (CDPH) Pass-Through Entity Award Numbers: H027A210072; S377A160014 Criteria: Procurement Standards of Title 2 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Costs Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) state that all non-federal entities will follow Sections 200.318 through Section 200.327. A. Section 200.320 identifies five methods of procurement to be followed: a. Informal ? micro-purchases b. Informal ? small purchases c. Formal ? sealed bids d. Formal ? competitive proposals e. Noncompetitive proposals Section 200.318 states that non-federal entities must have and use documented procurement procedures that are consistent with State and local laws in addition to the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. B. Per Section 200.320(b) if small purchases are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. C. Title 2 CFR section 200.303 states the following regarding internal control: ?The auditee shall maintain internal control over Federal programs that provides reasonable assurance that the auditee is managing Federal awards in compliance with law, regulations, and the provisions of contracts or grant agreements that could have a material effect on each of its Federal programs.? D. The Chicago Public Schools Procurement Manual requires the collection of three quotes for any purchase between $2,000.01 and $25,000 for any purchase with federal grant funds. Condition/Context: For the three programs referenced, we tested one-hundred and five (105) purchase orders totaling $31,156,308. Thirty-four (34) purchase orders totaling $523,384 were purchases greater than $2,000 but less than $25,000, and for which CPS did not obtain and/or document an adequate number of price or rate quotations as required by CPS? procurement policies. Our samples were not statistically valid. Cause: CPS employees at the program/school level may not be following the CPS Procurement Manual due to the decentralized nature of the process and the high number of purchases that can fall under the $2,000.01-$25,000 threshold. Questioned Costs: Questioned costs, if any, are unable to be determined, however, actual purchase orders that did not comply with the small purchase requirements of the CPS Policy Manual totaled $133,788 for Assistance Listing Number 84.027/84.173, $376,459 for Assistance Listing Number 84.377, and $13,137 for Assistance Listing Number 93.323. Effect: Chicago Public Schools did not document compliance with the requirements of the CPS Policy Manual as it relates to small purchases that fall between $2,000.01 and $25,000. Recommendation: We recommend that CPS communicate and re-enforce its procurement policies and procedures and any changes thereto in order to comply with the purchase requirements of the CPS Procurement Manual. Ensure proper communication is delivered to relevant employees regarding any changes to the CPS Procurement Manual and the CPS Procurement Manual. In addition, we recommend the consideration of implementing a system control that requires the recording of three quotes for purchases between $2,000.01 and $25,000. The system may be the permanent record. Views of Responsible Officials: Based on the prior year recommendation to the FY21 finding, dated December 15, 2021, in April, 2022, CPS revised the policies in the Procurement Manual to reflect the current standard. The Oracle procurement module was tested and upgraded to implement further controls to require the collection of three quotes for any purchase using federal grant funds between $2,000.01 and $25,000 in value. In addition, communication and reenforcement of the procurement policies in the CPS Procurement Manual at the program and school level has been completed through the mandatory training and district wide announcement. On May 9, 2022, US department of Education issued the determination letter concluding this finding resolved and closed.
FINDING 2022-002, 2021-001 ? REPEAT FINDING Information on the Federal Program: Federal Agencies: U.S. Department of Education Federal Programs: 84.027/84.173 Special Education Cluster (IDEA) 84.377 School Improvement Grants (Title 1003a IL-Empower) 93.323 Epidemiology and Lab Capacity (ELC) Pass-Through Entity: Illinois State Board of Education; City of Chicago Department of Public Health (CDPH) Pass-Through Entity Award Numbers: H027A210072; S377A160014 Criteria: Procurement Standards of Title 2 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Costs Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) state that all non-federal entities will follow Sections 200.318 through Section 200.327. A. Section 200.320 identifies five methods of procurement to be followed: a. Informal ? micro-purchases b. Informal ? small purchases c. Formal ? sealed bids d. Formal ? competitive proposals e. Noncompetitive proposals Section 200.318 states that non-federal entities must have and use documented procurement procedures that are consistent with State and local laws in addition to the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. B. Per Section 200.320(b) if small purchases are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. C. Title 2 CFR section 200.303 states the following regarding internal control: ?The auditee shall maintain internal control over Federal programs that provides reasonable assurance that the auditee is managing Federal awards in compliance with law, regulations, and the provisions of contracts or grant agreements that could have a material effect on each of its Federal programs.? D. The Chicago Public Schools Procurement Manual requires the collection of three quotes for any purchase between $2,000.01 and $25,000 for any purchase with federal grant funds. Condition/Context: For the three programs referenced, we tested one-hundred and five (105) purchase orders totaling $31,156,308. Thirty-four (34) purchase orders totaling $523,384 were purchases greater than $2,000 but less than $25,000, and for which CPS did not obtain and/or document an adequate number of price or rate quotations as required by CPS? procurement policies. Our samples were not statistically valid. Cause: CPS employees at the program/school level may not be following the CPS Procurement Manual due to the decentralized nature of the process and the high number of purchases that can fall under the $2,000.01-$25,000 threshold. Questioned Costs: Questioned costs, if any, are unable to be determined, however, actual purchase orders that did not comply with the small purchase requirements of the CPS Policy Manual totaled $133,788 for Assistance Listing Number 84.027/84.173, $376,459 for Assistance Listing Number 84.377, and $13,137 for Assistance Listing Number 93.323. Effect: Chicago Public Schools did not document compliance with the requirements of the CPS Policy Manual as it relates to small purchases that fall between $2,000.01 and $25,000. Recommendation: We recommend that CPS communicate and re-enforce its procurement policies and procedures and any changes thereto in order to comply with the purchase requirements of the CPS Procurement Manual. Ensure proper communication is delivered to relevant employees regarding any changes to the CPS Procurement Manual and the CPS Procurement Manual. In addition, we recommend the consideration of implementing a system control that requires the recording of three quotes for purchases between $2,000.01 and $25,000. The system may be the permanent record. Views of Responsible Officials: Based on the prior year recommendation to the FY21 finding, dated December 15, 2021, in April, 2022, CPS revised the policies in the Procurement Manual to reflect the current standard. The Oracle procurement module was tested and upgraded to implement further controls to require the collection of three quotes for any purchase using federal grant funds between $2,000.01 and $25,000 in value. In addition, communication and reenforcement of the procurement policies in the CPS Procurement Manual at the program and school level has been completed through the mandatory training and district wide announcement. On May 9, 2022, US department of Education issued the determination letter concluding this finding resolved and closed.
FINDING 2022-002, 2021-001 ? REPEAT FINDING Information on the Federal Program: Federal Agencies: U.S. Department of Education Federal Programs: 84.027/84.173 Special Education Cluster (IDEA) 84.377 School Improvement Grants (Title 1003a IL-Empower) 93.323 Epidemiology and Lab Capacity (ELC) Pass-Through Entity: Illinois State Board of Education; City of Chicago Department of Public Health (CDPH) Pass-Through Entity Award Numbers: H027A210072; S377A160014 Criteria: Procurement Standards of Title 2 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Costs Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) state that all non-federal entities will follow Sections 200.318 through Section 200.327. A. Section 200.320 identifies five methods of procurement to be followed: a. Informal ? micro-purchases b. Informal ? small purchases c. Formal ? sealed bids d. Formal ? competitive proposals e. Noncompetitive proposals Section 200.318 states that non-federal entities must have and use documented procurement procedures that are consistent with State and local laws in addition to the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. B. Per Section 200.320(b) if small purchases are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. C. Title 2 CFR section 200.303 states the following regarding internal control: ?The auditee shall maintain internal control over Federal programs that provides reasonable assurance that the auditee is managing Federal awards in compliance with law, regulations, and the provisions of contracts or grant agreements that could have a material effect on each of its Federal programs.? D. The Chicago Public Schools Procurement Manual requires the collection of three quotes for any purchase between $2,000.01 and $25,000 for any purchase with federal grant funds. Condition/Context: For the three programs referenced, we tested one-hundred and five (105) purchase orders totaling $31,156,308. Thirty-four (34) purchase orders totaling $523,384 were purchases greater than $2,000 but less than $25,000, and for which CPS did not obtain and/or document an adequate number of price or rate quotations as required by CPS? procurement policies. Our samples were not statistically valid. Cause: CPS employees at the program/school level may not be following the CPS Procurement Manual due to the decentralized nature of the process and the high number of purchases that can fall under the $2,000.01-$25,000 threshold. Questioned Costs: Questioned costs, if any, are unable to be determined, however, actual purchase orders that did not comply with the small purchase requirements of the CPS Policy Manual totaled $133,788 for Assistance Listing Number 84.027/84.173, $376,459 for Assistance Listing Number 84.377, and $13,137 for Assistance Listing Number 93.323. Effect: Chicago Public Schools did not document compliance with the requirements of the CPS Policy Manual as it relates to small purchases that fall between $2,000.01 and $25,000. Recommendation: We recommend that CPS communicate and re-enforce its procurement policies and procedures and any changes thereto in order to comply with the purchase requirements of the CPS Procurement Manual. Ensure proper communication is delivered to relevant employees regarding any changes to the CPS Procurement Manual and the CPS Procurement Manual. In addition, we recommend the consideration of implementing a system control that requires the recording of three quotes for purchases between $2,000.01 and $25,000. The system may be the permanent record. Views of Responsible Officials: Based on the prior year recommendation to the FY21 finding, dated December 15, 2021, in April, 2022, CPS revised the policies in the Procurement Manual to reflect the current standard. The Oracle procurement module was tested and upgraded to implement further controls to require the collection of three quotes for any purchase using federal grant funds between $2,000.01 and $25,000 in value. In addition, communication and reenforcement of the procurement policies in the CPS Procurement Manual at the program and school level has been completed through the mandatory training and district wide announcement. On May 9, 2022, US department of Education issued the determination letter concluding this finding resolved and closed.
2022-001 Noncompliance with Procurement, Suspension, & Debarment Standard ? 93.829 Criteria ? 2 CFR 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, ?200.320 (a)(2)(i) requires that price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-federal entity for purchases over $50,000. Kennebec Behavioral Health?s internal policy is to obtain bids and document an analysis for all purchases at a lower threshold of $25,001. In addition, non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with parties that are suspended or debarred under covered transactions. Condition and Context ? Audit procedures revealed that there was not a competitive bid process before entering into a consulting agreement that was over the Uniform Administrative Requirement?s, as well as the Organization?s thresholds. In addition, there was not a process in place to formally document the review of that contracting entity for suspension and debarment prior to entering into the agreement. Cause ? The Organization does not have a formal form to document bids, suspension, and debarment. The documentation of these processes was left to manager discretion. There were time constraints for budget submission that lead to the manager determining that there was not sufficient time to solicit bids. Though no additional attempts to solicit bids were documented, the manager reported that she relied on recommendations from peer Organizations who had gone through a bidding process for similar contracts. No analysis was formally documented in writing prior to entering into the agreement, though it was clear that the manager thoughtfully considered the Organization?s options and determined that the contractor was the best suited for the agreement. Effect ? The Organization was not in compliance with procurement standards for bids on the consulting agreement tested. The Organization did not formally document its initial review of suspension and debarment for this agreement, though the contractor was found to not be on prohibited lists at annual review. Questioned Costs ? None Recommendations ? Management should strengthen their processes, controls, and review over procurement, suspension, and debarment processes and ensure compliance with Uniform Administrative Requirements, as well as their own procurement policies. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions ? Senior management has formally reminded and reviewed KBH?s policies for procurement and sanction screening for exclusion/suspension/debarment with the full management team and Business Operations group. To assist with the process, a checklist for large purchases and/or service contracts will be developed and required to be attached to any new purchases and/or contracts. KBH?s Policy 1520, Procurement Bidding Requirements, has been revised to include the checklist requirement. As specifically related to the contract noted above, KBH developed an RFP and reissued solicitations for Evaluator work for CCBHC, effective 10/31/22.
2022-002: DOCUMENTATION OF PROCUREMENT, SUSPENSION, AND DEBARMENT PROCEDURES (CODE 50000) Programs Affected ESEA: Title I School Improvement Grant, U.S. Department of Education, Federal Assistance Listing Number 84.377, passed through California Department of Education, award year 2021/22, award number not available. Elementary and Secondary Emergency Relief (ESSER), U.S. Department of Education, Federal Assistance Listing Number 84.425D, passed through California Department of Education, award year 2021/22, award number not available. Elementary and Secondary Emergency Relief (ESSER II), U.S. Department of Education, Federal Assistance Listing Number 84.425D, passed through California Department of Education, award year 2021/22, award number not available. Elementary and Secondary Emergency Relief (ESSER III) 80%, U.S. Department of Education, Federal Assistance Listing Number 84.425U, passed through California Department of Education, award year 2021/22, award number not available. Governor's Emergency Education Relief (GEER), U.S. Department of Education, Federal Assistance Listing Number 84.425C, passed through California Department of Education, award year 2021/22, award number not available. National School Lunch Program, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Federal Assistance Listing Number 10.555, passed through the California Department of Education, award year 2021/22, award number not available. ESEA: Title I, U.S. Department of Education, Federal Assistance Listing Number 84.010, passed through California Department of Education, award year 2021/22, award number not available. ESEA: Title IV, Part A, Student Support and Academic Enrichment, U.S. Department of Education, Federal Assistance Listing Number 84.424, passed through California Department of Education, award year 2021/22, award number not available. Criteria Title 2, Section 200.318 (2 CFR 200.318) of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), requires written policies and procedures regarding procurement of goods and services for federal awards. 2 CFR 200.320 requires that one of three procurement methods be used: Procurements by micro-purchases for acquisition of supplies or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold (currently $10,000); Procurements by small purchase procedures, for securing goods or services that do not cost more than the Simplified Acquisition Threshold (currently $250,000); or Procurement by sealed bids, for goods and services in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. In addition, 2 CFR 200.213 requires that written procedures be in place for checking suspension and debarment status of certain vendors receiving federal funds from the District. Condition During our testing of expenditures, in which we tested 37 percent of all federal expenditures for goods and services, we noted that the District did not document procurement procedures and vendor suspension/debarment review for purchases charged to federal programs. Based on discussions with District management, they did perform procurement procedures regarding review of vendors for reasonable and best available pricing and for suspension and debarment, but these procedures were not documented in writing. None of the District's expenditures exceeded the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. No unallowable costs were noted as a result of this finding, and based on our review of vendors used for federal program expenditures, none of the vendors receiving federal funds were suspended or debarred in 2021/22. Identification of Repeat Finding This finding is a repeat of prior year Finding 2021-002. Cause The District did establish a form to document in writing the procurement and suspension and debarment procedures performed for vendors during the year, but did not implement the use of that form in 2021/22. Effect Based on review of detail of federal expenditures, there were no vendors or contractors who exceeded the Simplified Acquisition Threshold, and based on audit testing of significant vendors used by the District during the year, no vendors or contractors were noted who were suspended or debarred, and no unallowed expenditures were noted. Questioned Costs There are no questioned costs. However, the District did not document that it utilized the lowest cost vendor possible. The District has limited options available for vendors charged to its federal programs and it is unlikely that a reliable lower cost vendor would be found. Recommendation We recommend that the District implement the use of the form they have created to document review of multiple vendor quotes for services and for verifying that vendors are not suspended or debarred from receiving federal funds. We further recommend that the District update its procurement policy to include all federal programs. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions The District agrees and will adhere to the corrective action plan described in the "District's Corrective Action Plan" section immediately following this section of the audit report.
2022-002: DOCUMENTATION OF PROCUREMENT, SUSPENSION, AND DEBARMENT PROCEDURES (CODE 50000) Programs Affected ESEA: Title I School Improvement Grant, U.S. Department of Education, Federal Assistance Listing Number 84.377, passed through California Department of Education, award year 2021/22, award number not available. Elementary and Secondary Emergency Relief (ESSER), U.S. Department of Education, Federal Assistance Listing Number 84.425D, passed through California Department of Education, award year 2021/22, award number not available. Elementary and Secondary Emergency Relief (ESSER II), U.S. Department of Education, Federal Assistance Listing Number 84.425D, passed through California Department of Education, award year 2021/22, award number not available. Elementary and Secondary Emergency Relief (ESSER III) 80%, U.S. Department of Education, Federal Assistance Listing Number 84.425U, passed through California Department of Education, award year 2021/22, award number not available. Governor's Emergency Education Relief (GEER), U.S. Department of Education, Federal Assistance Listing Number 84.425C, passed through California Department of Education, award year 2021/22, award number not available. National School Lunch Program, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Federal Assistance Listing Number 10.555, passed through the California Department of Education, award year 2021/22, award number not available. ESEA: Title I, U.S. Department of Education, Federal Assistance Listing Number 84.010, passed through California Department of Education, award year 2021/22, award number not available. ESEA: Title IV, Part A, Student Support and Academic Enrichment, U.S. Department of Education, Federal Assistance Listing Number 84.424, passed through California Department of Education, award year 2021/22, award number not available. Criteria Title 2, Section 200.318 (2 CFR 200.318) of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), requires written policies and procedures regarding procurement of goods and services for federal awards. 2 CFR 200.320 requires that one of three procurement methods be used: Procurements by micro-purchases for acquisition of supplies or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold (currently $10,000); Procurements by small purchase procedures, for securing goods or services that do not cost more than the Simplified Acquisition Threshold (currently $250,000); or Procurement by sealed bids, for goods and services in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. In addition, 2 CFR 200.213 requires that written procedures be in place for checking suspension and debarment status of certain vendors receiving federal funds from the District. Condition During our testing of expenditures, in which we tested 37 percent of all federal expenditures for goods and services, we noted that the District did not document procurement procedures and vendor suspension/debarment review for purchases charged to federal programs. Based on discussions with District management, they did perform procurement procedures regarding review of vendors for reasonable and best available pricing and for suspension and debarment, but these procedures were not documented in writing. None of the District's expenditures exceeded the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. No unallowable costs were noted as a result of this finding, and based on our review of vendors used for federal program expenditures, none of the vendors receiving federal funds were suspended or debarred in 2021/22. Identification of Repeat Finding This finding is a repeat of prior year Finding 2021-002. Cause The District did establish a form to document in writing the procurement and suspension and debarment procedures performed for vendors during the year, but did not implement the use of that form in 2021/22. Effect Based on review of detail of federal expenditures, there were no vendors or contractors who exceeded the Simplified Acquisition Threshold, and based on audit testing of significant vendors used by the District during the year, no vendors or contractors were noted who were suspended or debarred, and no unallowed expenditures were noted. Questioned Costs There are no questioned costs. However, the District did not document that it utilized the lowest cost vendor possible. The District has limited options available for vendors charged to its federal programs and it is unlikely that a reliable lower cost vendor would be found. Recommendation We recommend that the District implement the use of the form they have created to document review of multiple vendor quotes for services and for verifying that vendors are not suspended or debarred from receiving federal funds. We further recommend that the District update its procurement policy to include all federal programs. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions The District agrees and will adhere to the corrective action plan described in the "District's Corrective Action Plan" section immediately following this section of the audit report.
2022-002: DOCUMENTATION OF PROCUREMENT, SUSPENSION, AND DEBARMENT PROCEDURES (CODE 50000) Programs Affected ESEA: Title I School Improvement Grant, U.S. Department of Education, Federal Assistance Listing Number 84.377, passed through California Department of Education, award year 2021/22, award number not available. Elementary and Secondary Emergency Relief (ESSER), U.S. Department of Education, Federal Assistance Listing Number 84.425D, passed through California Department of Education, award year 2021/22, award number not available. Elementary and Secondary Emergency Relief (ESSER II), U.S. Department of Education, Federal Assistance Listing Number 84.425D, passed through California Department of Education, award year 2021/22, award number not available. Elementary and Secondary Emergency Relief (ESSER III) 80%, U.S. Department of Education, Federal Assistance Listing Number 84.425U, passed through California Department of Education, award year 2021/22, award number not available. Governor's Emergency Education Relief (GEER), U.S. Department of Education, Federal Assistance Listing Number 84.425C, passed through California Department of Education, award year 2021/22, award number not available. National School Lunch Program, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Federal Assistance Listing Number 10.555, passed through the California Department of Education, award year 2021/22, award number not available. ESEA: Title I, U.S. Department of Education, Federal Assistance Listing Number 84.010, passed through California Department of Education, award year 2021/22, award number not available. ESEA: Title IV, Part A, Student Support and Academic Enrichment, U.S. Department of Education, Federal Assistance Listing Number 84.424, passed through California Department of Education, award year 2021/22, award number not available. Criteria Title 2, Section 200.318 (2 CFR 200.318) of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), requires written policies and procedures regarding procurement of goods and services for federal awards. 2 CFR 200.320 requires that one of three procurement methods be used: Procurements by micro-purchases for acquisition of supplies or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold (currently $10,000); Procurements by small purchase procedures, for securing goods or services that do not cost more than the Simplified Acquisition Threshold (currently $250,000); or Procurement by sealed bids, for goods and services in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. In addition, 2 CFR 200.213 requires that written procedures be in place for checking suspension and debarment status of certain vendors receiving federal funds from the District. Condition During our testing of expenditures, in which we tested 37 percent of all federal expenditures for goods and services, we noted that the District did not document procurement procedures and vendor suspension/debarment review for purchases charged to federal programs. Based on discussions with District management, they did perform procurement procedures regarding review of vendors for reasonable and best available pricing and for suspension and debarment, but these procedures were not documented in writing. None of the District's expenditures exceeded the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. No unallowable costs were noted as a result of this finding, and based on our review of vendors used for federal program expenditures, none of the vendors receiving federal funds were suspended or debarred in 2021/22. Identification of Repeat Finding This finding is a repeat of prior year Finding 2021-002. Cause The District did establish a form to document in writing the procurement and suspension and debarment procedures performed for vendors during the year, but did not implement the use of that form in 2021/22. Effect Based on review of detail of federal expenditures, there were no vendors or contractors who exceeded the Simplified Acquisition Threshold, and based on audit testing of significant vendors used by the District during the year, no vendors or contractors were noted who were suspended or debarred, and no unallowed expenditures were noted. Questioned Costs There are no questioned costs. However, the District did not document that it utilized the lowest cost vendor possible. The District has limited options available for vendors charged to its federal programs and it is unlikely that a reliable lower cost vendor would be found. Recommendation We recommend that the District implement the use of the form they have created to document review of multiple vendor quotes for services and for verifying that vendors are not suspended or debarred from receiving federal funds. We further recommend that the District update its procurement policy to include all federal programs. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions The District agrees and will adhere to the corrective action plan described in the "District's Corrective Action Plan" section immediately following this section of the audit report.
2022-002: DOCUMENTATION OF PROCUREMENT, SUSPENSION, AND DEBARMENT PROCEDURES (CODE 50000) Programs Affected ESEA: Title I School Improvement Grant, U.S. Department of Education, Federal Assistance Listing Number 84.377, passed through California Department of Education, award year 2021/22, award number not available. Elementary and Secondary Emergency Relief (ESSER), U.S. Department of Education, Federal Assistance Listing Number 84.425D, passed through California Department of Education, award year 2021/22, award number not available. Elementary and Secondary Emergency Relief (ESSER II), U.S. Department of Education, Federal Assistance Listing Number 84.425D, passed through California Department of Education, award year 2021/22, award number not available. Elementary and Secondary Emergency Relief (ESSER III) 80%, U.S. Department of Education, Federal Assistance Listing Number 84.425U, passed through California Department of Education, award year 2021/22, award number not available. Governor's Emergency Education Relief (GEER), U.S. Department of Education, Federal Assistance Listing Number 84.425C, passed through California Department of Education, award year 2021/22, award number not available. National School Lunch Program, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Federal Assistance Listing Number 10.555, passed through the California Department of Education, award year 2021/22, award number not available. ESEA: Title I, U.S. Department of Education, Federal Assistance Listing Number 84.010, passed through California Department of Education, award year 2021/22, award number not available. ESEA: Title IV, Part A, Student Support and Academic Enrichment, U.S. Department of Education, Federal Assistance Listing Number 84.424, passed through California Department of Education, award year 2021/22, award number not available. Criteria Title 2, Section 200.318 (2 CFR 200.318) of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), requires written policies and procedures regarding procurement of goods and services for federal awards. 2 CFR 200.320 requires that one of three procurement methods be used: Procurements by micro-purchases for acquisition of supplies or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold (currently $10,000); Procurements by small purchase procedures, for securing goods or services that do not cost more than the Simplified Acquisition Threshold (currently $250,000); or Procurement by sealed bids, for goods and services in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. In addition, 2 CFR 200.213 requires that written procedures be in place for checking suspension and debarment status of certain vendors receiving federal funds from the District. Condition During our testing of expenditures, in which we tested 37 percent of all federal expenditures for goods and services, we noted that the District did not document procurement procedures and vendor suspension/debarment review for purchases charged to federal programs. Based on discussions with District management, they did perform procurement procedures regarding review of vendors for reasonable and best available pricing and for suspension and debarment, but these procedures were not documented in writing. None of the District's expenditures exceeded the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. No unallowable costs were noted as a result of this finding, and based on our review of vendors used for federal program expenditures, none of the vendors receiving federal funds were suspended or debarred in 2021/22. Identification of Repeat Finding This finding is a repeat of prior year Finding 2021-002. Cause The District did establish a form to document in writing the procurement and suspension and debarment procedures performed for vendors during the year, but did not implement the use of that form in 2021/22. Effect Based on review of detail of federal expenditures, there were no vendors or contractors who exceeded the Simplified Acquisition Threshold, and based on audit testing of significant vendors used by the District during the year, no vendors or contractors were noted who were suspended or debarred, and no unallowed expenditures were noted. Questioned Costs There are no questioned costs. However, the District did not document that it utilized the lowest cost vendor possible. The District has limited options available for vendors charged to its federal programs and it is unlikely that a reliable lower cost vendor would be found. Recommendation We recommend that the District implement the use of the form they have created to document review of multiple vendor quotes for services and for verifying that vendors are not suspended or debarred from receiving federal funds. We further recommend that the District update its procurement policy to include all federal programs. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions The District agrees and will adhere to the corrective action plan described in the "District's Corrective Action Plan" section immediately following this section of the audit report.
2022-002: DOCUMENTATION OF PROCUREMENT, SUSPENSION, AND DEBARMENT PROCEDURES (CODE 50000) Programs Affected ESEA: Title I School Improvement Grant, U.S. Department of Education, Federal Assistance Listing Number 84.377, passed through California Department of Education, award year 2021/22, award number not available. Elementary and Secondary Emergency Relief (ESSER), U.S. Department of Education, Federal Assistance Listing Number 84.425D, passed through California Department of Education, award year 2021/22, award number not available. Elementary and Secondary Emergency Relief (ESSER II), U.S. Department of Education, Federal Assistance Listing Number 84.425D, passed through California Department of Education, award year 2021/22, award number not available. Elementary and Secondary Emergency Relief (ESSER III) 80%, U.S. Department of Education, Federal Assistance Listing Number 84.425U, passed through California Department of Education, award year 2021/22, award number not available. Governor's Emergency Education Relief (GEER), U.S. Department of Education, Federal Assistance Listing Number 84.425C, passed through California Department of Education, award year 2021/22, award number not available. National School Lunch Program, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Federal Assistance Listing Number 10.555, passed through the California Department of Education, award year 2021/22, award number not available. ESEA: Title I, U.S. Department of Education, Federal Assistance Listing Number 84.010, passed through California Department of Education, award year 2021/22, award number not available. ESEA: Title IV, Part A, Student Support and Academic Enrichment, U.S. Department of Education, Federal Assistance Listing Number 84.424, passed through California Department of Education, award year 2021/22, award number not available. Criteria Title 2, Section 200.318 (2 CFR 200.318) of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), requires written policies and procedures regarding procurement of goods and services for federal awards. 2 CFR 200.320 requires that one of three procurement methods be used: Procurements by micro-purchases for acquisition of supplies or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold (currently $10,000); Procurements by small purchase procedures, for securing goods or services that do not cost more than the Simplified Acquisition Threshold (currently $250,000); or Procurement by sealed bids, for goods and services in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. In addition, 2 CFR 200.213 requires that written procedures be in place for checking suspension and debarment status of certain vendors receiving federal funds from the District. Condition During our testing of expenditures, in which we tested 37 percent of all federal expenditures for goods and services, we noted that the District did not document procurement procedures and vendor suspension/debarment review for purchases charged to federal programs. Based on discussions with District management, they did perform procurement procedures regarding review of vendors for reasonable and best available pricing and for suspension and debarment, but these procedures were not documented in writing. None of the District's expenditures exceeded the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. No unallowable costs were noted as a result of this finding, and based on our review of vendors used for federal program expenditures, none of the vendors receiving federal funds were suspended or debarred in 2021/22. Identification of Repeat Finding This finding is a repeat of prior year Finding 2021-002. Cause The District did establish a form to document in writing the procurement and suspension and debarment procedures performed for vendors during the year, but did not implement the use of that form in 2021/22. Effect Based on review of detail of federal expenditures, there were no vendors or contractors who exceeded the Simplified Acquisition Threshold, and based on audit testing of significant vendors used by the District during the year, no vendors or contractors were noted who were suspended or debarred, and no unallowed expenditures were noted. Questioned Costs There are no questioned costs. However, the District did not document that it utilized the lowest cost vendor possible. The District has limited options available for vendors charged to its federal programs and it is unlikely that a reliable lower cost vendor would be found. Recommendation We recommend that the District implement the use of the form they have created to document review of multiple vendor quotes for services and for verifying that vendors are not suspended or debarred from receiving federal funds. We further recommend that the District update its procurement policy to include all federal programs. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions The District agrees and will adhere to the corrective action plan described in the "District's Corrective Action Plan" section immediately following this section of the audit report.
2022-002: DOCUMENTATION OF PROCUREMENT, SUSPENSION, AND DEBARMENT PROCEDURES (CODE 50000) Programs Affected ESEA: Title I School Improvement Grant, U.S. Department of Education, Federal Assistance Listing Number 84.377, passed through California Department of Education, award year 2021/22, award number not available. Elementary and Secondary Emergency Relief (ESSER), U.S. Department of Education, Federal Assistance Listing Number 84.425D, passed through California Department of Education, award year 2021/22, award number not available. Elementary and Secondary Emergency Relief (ESSER II), U.S. Department of Education, Federal Assistance Listing Number 84.425D, passed through California Department of Education, award year 2021/22, award number not available. Elementary and Secondary Emergency Relief (ESSER III) 80%, U.S. Department of Education, Federal Assistance Listing Number 84.425U, passed through California Department of Education, award year 2021/22, award number not available. Governor's Emergency Education Relief (GEER), U.S. Department of Education, Federal Assistance Listing Number 84.425C, passed through California Department of Education, award year 2021/22, award number not available. National School Lunch Program, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Federal Assistance Listing Number 10.555, passed through the California Department of Education, award year 2021/22, award number not available. ESEA: Title I, U.S. Department of Education, Federal Assistance Listing Number 84.010, passed through California Department of Education, award year 2021/22, award number not available. ESEA: Title IV, Part A, Student Support and Academic Enrichment, U.S. Department of Education, Federal Assistance Listing Number 84.424, passed through California Department of Education, award year 2021/22, award number not available. Criteria Title 2, Section 200.318 (2 CFR 200.318) of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), requires written policies and procedures regarding procurement of goods and services for federal awards. 2 CFR 200.320 requires that one of three procurement methods be used: Procurements by micro-purchases for acquisition of supplies or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold (currently $10,000); Procurements by small purchase procedures, for securing goods or services that do not cost more than the Simplified Acquisition Threshold (currently $250,000); or Procurement by sealed bids, for goods and services in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. In addition, 2 CFR 200.213 requires that written procedures be in place for checking suspension and debarment status of certain vendors receiving federal funds from the District. Condition During our testing of expenditures, in which we tested 37 percent of all federal expenditures for goods and services, we noted that the District did not document procurement procedures and vendor suspension/debarment review for purchases charged to federal programs. Based on discussions with District management, they did perform procurement procedures regarding review of vendors for reasonable and best available pricing and for suspension and debarment, but these procedures were not documented in writing. None of the District's expenditures exceeded the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. No unallowable costs were noted as a result of this finding, and based on our review of vendors used for federal program expenditures, none of the vendors receiving federal funds were suspended or debarred in 2021/22. Identification of Repeat Finding This finding is a repeat of prior year Finding 2021-002. Cause The District did establish a form to document in writing the procurement and suspension and debarment procedures performed for vendors during the year, but did not implement the use of that form in 2021/22. Effect Based on review of detail of federal expenditures, there were no vendors or contractors who exceeded the Simplified Acquisition Threshold, and based on audit testing of significant vendors used by the District during the year, no vendors or contractors were noted who were suspended or debarred, and no unallowed expenditures were noted. Questioned Costs There are no questioned costs. However, the District did not document that it utilized the lowest cost vendor possible. The District has limited options available for vendors charged to its federal programs and it is unlikely that a reliable lower cost vendor would be found. Recommendation We recommend that the District implement the use of the form they have created to document review of multiple vendor quotes for services and for verifying that vendors are not suspended or debarred from receiving federal funds. We further recommend that the District update its procurement policy to include all federal programs. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions The District agrees and will adhere to the corrective action plan described in the "District's Corrective Action Plan" section immediately following this section of the audit report.
2022-002: DOCUMENTATION OF PROCUREMENT, SUSPENSION, AND DEBARMENT PROCEDURES (CODE 50000) Programs Affected ESEA: Title I School Improvement Grant, U.S. Department of Education, Federal Assistance Listing Number 84.377, passed through California Department of Education, award year 2021/22, award number not available. Elementary and Secondary Emergency Relief (ESSER), U.S. Department of Education, Federal Assistance Listing Number 84.425D, passed through California Department of Education, award year 2021/22, award number not available. Elementary and Secondary Emergency Relief (ESSER II), U.S. Department of Education, Federal Assistance Listing Number 84.425D, passed through California Department of Education, award year 2021/22, award number not available. Elementary and Secondary Emergency Relief (ESSER III) 80%, U.S. Department of Education, Federal Assistance Listing Number 84.425U, passed through California Department of Education, award year 2021/22, award number not available. Governor's Emergency Education Relief (GEER), U.S. Department of Education, Federal Assistance Listing Number 84.425C, passed through California Department of Education, award year 2021/22, award number not available. National School Lunch Program, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Federal Assistance Listing Number 10.555, passed through the California Department of Education, award year 2021/22, award number not available. ESEA: Title I, U.S. Department of Education, Federal Assistance Listing Number 84.010, passed through California Department of Education, award year 2021/22, award number not available. ESEA: Title IV, Part A, Student Support and Academic Enrichment, U.S. Department of Education, Federal Assistance Listing Number 84.424, passed through California Department of Education, award year 2021/22, award number not available. Criteria Title 2, Section 200.318 (2 CFR 200.318) of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), requires written policies and procedures regarding procurement of goods and services for federal awards. 2 CFR 200.320 requires that one of three procurement methods be used: Procurements by micro-purchases for acquisition of supplies or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold (currently $10,000); Procurements by small purchase procedures, for securing goods or services that do not cost more than the Simplified Acquisition Threshold (currently $250,000); or Procurement by sealed bids, for goods and services in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. In addition, 2 CFR 200.213 requires that written procedures be in place for checking suspension and debarment status of certain vendors receiving federal funds from the District. Condition During our testing of expenditures, in which we tested 37 percent of all federal expenditures for goods and services, we noted that the District did not document procurement procedures and vendor suspension/debarment review for purchases charged to federal programs. Based on discussions with District management, they did perform procurement procedures regarding review of vendors for reasonable and best available pricing and for suspension and debarment, but these procedures were not documented in writing. None of the District's expenditures exceeded the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. No unallowable costs were noted as a result of this finding, and based on our review of vendors used for federal program expenditures, none of the vendors receiving federal funds were suspended or debarred in 2021/22. Identification of Repeat Finding This finding is a repeat of prior year Finding 2021-002. Cause The District did establish a form to document in writing the procurement and suspension and debarment procedures performed for vendors during the year, but did not implement the use of that form in 2021/22. Effect Based on review of detail of federal expenditures, there were no vendors or contractors who exceeded the Simplified Acquisition Threshold, and based on audit testing of significant vendors used by the District during the year, no vendors or contractors were noted who were suspended or debarred, and no unallowed expenditures were noted. Questioned Costs There are no questioned costs. However, the District did not document that it utilized the lowest cost vendor possible. The District has limited options available for vendors charged to its federal programs and it is unlikely that a reliable lower cost vendor would be found. Recommendation We recommend that the District implement the use of the form they have created to document review of multiple vendor quotes for services and for verifying that vendors are not suspended or debarred from receiving federal funds. We further recommend that the District update its procurement policy to include all federal programs. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions The District agrees and will adhere to the corrective action plan described in the "District's Corrective Action Plan" section immediately following this section of the audit report.
2022-008. Finding: Procurement Requirements Not Followed Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Assistance Listing Number: 84.425F Program Expenditures: $16,705,064 Program Name: Education Stabilization Fund Award Number(s): P425F200234 Questioned Costs: None The Southern Illinois University (University) Edwardsville campus did not follow procurement requirements for all purchases under the Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund (HEERF). During our testing of purchases made using institutional HEERF funds, we noted 1 out of 5 (20%) of transactions tested for procurement, purchased for $15,160, did not have documentation that procurement policies were followed. The sample was not a statistically valid sample. According to Uniform Guidance (2 CFR 200.320), the University must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with federal standards. Additionally, per Uniform Guidance (2 CFR 200.320), if small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the University. The University?s procurement policy defines small purchases as those ranging from $10,001 to $99,000. Uniform Guidance (2 CFR 200.320) also allows for noncompetitive procurement, in which price or rate quotations are not required to be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources, if certain circumstances apply, including the purchased item being available only from a single source. Uniform Guidance (2 CFR 200.303(a)) requires non-Federal entities receiving Federal awards establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal laws, regulations, and program compliance requirements. Effective internal controls should include procedures to ensure procurement policies are followed. The Fiscal Control and Internal Auditing Act (30 ILCS 10/3001) requires the establishment and maintenance of a system, or systems, of internal fiscal and administrative controls to safeguard funds against waste, loss, unauthorized use, and misappropriation. The State Records Act (5 ILCS 160/8) requires records to be made and preserved containing adequate and proper documentation of decisions of the agency designed to furnish information to protect the legal and financial rights of the State and of persons directly affected by the agency?s activities. According to University officials, the department making the purchase does not typically receive funding subject to federal procurement requirements and therefore was unaware of the rules and regulations specific to purchases made with federal funds. Compliance with procurement policies helps ensure prudent use of federal funding. Failure to follow federal procurement regulations increases the likelihood of expenses being disallowed upon review by a federal agency and increases the risk of reduced funding in future years. (Finding Code No. 2022-008) RECOMMENDATION We recommend the University provide training to all departments with access to federal funding, specifically on the topic of procurement. UNIVERSITY RESPONSE We agree that procurement requirements were not followed for the identified purchases. Steps will be taken to reduce the risk of noncompliance going forward in instances where the procuring department may not regularly utilize grants funds for procurements.
Finding 2022-004 Information on the federal program: Subject: Special Education Cluster ? Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Special Education Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 84.027 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Finding: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(a) states: "The non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable State, local, and tribal laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal law and the standards identified in this part." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal Entity must use one of the following methods of procurement. . . . (b) Formal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal financial assistance award exceeds the SAT, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require following documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a non-competitive procurement can be used in accordance with ? 200.319 or paragraph (c) of this section. The following formal methods of procurement are used for procurement of property or services above the simplified acquisition threshold or a value below the simplified acquisition threshold the non-Federal entity determines to be appropriate: (1) Sealed bids (2) Proposals Section III ? Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (Continued) 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirements. Cause: The School Corporation's management had not developed a system of internal controls to ensure compliance with the compliance requirements listed above. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system enabled noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: The School Corporation did not perform a formal procurement when the School Corporation signed a contract with the service provider in July 2017. Additionally, the contract was extended in February 2019 through June 30, 2029 without a formal procurement process. The School Corporation did not have procedures in place to ensure the service provider was not debarred or suspended when the original contracts and amendments were signed. Identification as a repeat finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the School Corporation implement procedures to ensure compliance with the grant agreement requirements and the procurement and suspension and debarment compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
Finding 2022-004 Information on the federal program: Subject: Special Education Cluster ? Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Special Education Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 84.027 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Finding: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(a) states: "The non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable State, local, and tribal laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal law and the standards identified in this part." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal Entity must use one of the following methods of procurement. . . . (b) Formal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal financial assistance award exceeds the SAT, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require following documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a non-competitive procurement can be used in accordance with ? 200.319 or paragraph (c) of this section. The following formal methods of procurement are used for procurement of property or services above the simplified acquisition threshold or a value below the simplified acquisition threshold the non-Federal entity determines to be appropriate: (1) Sealed bids (2) Proposals Section III ? Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (Continued) 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirements. Cause: The School Corporation's management had not developed a system of internal controls to ensure compliance with the compliance requirements listed above. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system enabled noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: The School Corporation did not perform a formal procurement when the School Corporation signed a contract with the service provider in July 2017. Additionally, the contract was extended in February 2019 through June 30, 2029 without a formal procurement process. The School Corporation did not have procedures in place to ensure the service provider was not debarred or suspended when the original contracts and amendments were signed. Identification as a repeat finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the School Corporation implement procedures to ensure compliance with the grant agreement requirements and the procurement and suspension and debarment compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
Finding 2022-004 Information on the federal program: Subject: Special Education Cluster ? Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Special Education Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 84.027 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Finding: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(a) states: "The non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable State, local, and tribal laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal law and the standards identified in this part." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal Entity must use one of the following methods of procurement. . . . (b) Formal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal financial assistance award exceeds the SAT, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require following documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a non-competitive procurement can be used in accordance with ? 200.319 or paragraph (c) of this section. The following formal methods of procurement are used for procurement of property or services above the simplified acquisition threshold or a value below the simplified acquisition threshold the non-Federal entity determines to be appropriate: (1) Sealed bids (2) Proposals Section III ? Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (Continued) 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirements. Cause: The School Corporation's management had not developed a system of internal controls to ensure compliance with the compliance requirements listed above. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system enabled noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: The School Corporation did not perform a formal procurement when the School Corporation signed a contract with the service provider in July 2017. Additionally, the contract was extended in February 2019 through June 30, 2029 without a formal procurement process. The School Corporation did not have procedures in place to ensure the service provider was not debarred or suspended when the original contracts and amendments were signed. Identification as a repeat finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the School Corporation implement procedures to ensure compliance with the grant agreement requirements and the procurement and suspension and debarment compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
SD 2022-006 Subrecipient Procurement Policy Federal Award: 14.231 Emergency Solutions Grant Program 2022 Funding Department of Housing and Urban Development Passed through the Florida Department of Children and Families Contract No. GPZ48 Criteria: 2 CFR Part 180 prohibits award recipients from entering into covered transactions with vendors who are suspended or debarred. Further, 2 CFR 200.320 sets forth the requirements for acquisition contracts awarded to vendors including the requirement to obtain price or rate quotations from an adequate number of qualified sources and the circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement methods can be used. 2 CFR 200.303 requires non-federal entities to establish and maintain effective internal controls. Policies and procedures at subrecipient organizations should ensure competitive procurement and the use of vendors who are not suspended or debarred for grant-funded expenditures. Condition: Subrecipients are required to have procurement policies which ensure competitive procurement and use vendors who are not suspended or debarred for grant-funded expenditures. Cause: The Organization has not developed a process to monitor this requirement for subrecipients. Effect: The Organization may reimburse subrecipients for transactions which did not comply with competitive procurement requirements or were made with suspended or debarred vendors. Questioned Costs: None Perspective: The Organization has competitive procurement procedures and verifies vendors are in good-standing for their grant-funded expenses. Procurement policies at subrecipients have not been required to be provided or evaluated. Recommendation: Prior to approving funding to a subrecipient, and annually thereafter, the Organization should require subrecipients to submit procurement policies which ensure competitive procurement and the use of vendors who are not suspended or debarred for grant-funded expenditures. Management Response: Since the prior audit, we implemented several changes which affect the repeated findings. The fiscal year 20-21 audit report was issued on June 30, 2022. The change in the fiscal year resulted in a 12-hour turnaround making it difficult to clear the findings and implement the recommended changes from last year's audit. We addressed the procurement policies with our existing subcontractors during their fiscal year 21-22 Monitoring visits in May, 2022. We added to any new and/or existing contracts the requirement for the Agency to supply their Procurement policies that ensure competitive procurement and the use of vendors who are not suspended or debarred for grant-funded expenditures. All new sub-recipient contracts that went into effect July 1, 2022 made the implementation of the recommended change effective outside of the fiscal year in review. This finding will be cleared in our next audit.