FINDING 2024-005 Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls over Compliance and Noncompliance - Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Treasury Pass through Grantor: Multiple Federal Program(s): COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number(s): 21.027 Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.320 Procurement methods paragraph (b), formal procurement methods are required when the value of the procurement transaction under a federal award exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold of the recipient or subrecipient. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.214 outlines the suspension and debarment requirements for non-federal entities receiving federal funds. It mandates that these entities must not engage in "covered transactions" with individuals or organizations that are suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from participating in federal programs. Condition/Context: For one vendor, based on the services to be provided, management was required to issue a public notice solicitation in accordance with the required 2 CFR 200 regulations; however, such a notice was not solicited. Additionally, management did not perform a suspension and debarment check prior to work performed with the vendor. Cause: Due to the infrequency of entering into contracts above the simplified acquisition threshold, management was in the process of formally adopting a procurement policy and did not formalize the steps that would have included the procurement policy of the simplified acquisition threshold and formalize suspension and department checks. Effect: Grant funded contracts could be awarded to vendors that are less cost effective and suspended/debarred, which would be in violation of federal regulations and may result in the early termination of the grant award, non-reimbursement of grant funding, or cessation of future funding. Questioned Costs: None. Recommendation: Management should implement a formal policy outlining the procurement threshold and the requirement of a Suspension and debarment check in accordance with 2 CFR.200 requirements. Repeat Finding: No. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan.
FINDING 2024-005 Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls over Compliance and Noncompliance - Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Treasury Pass through Grantor: Multiple Federal Program(s): COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number(s): 21.027 Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.320 Procurement methods paragraph (b), formal procurement methods are required when the value of the procurement transaction under a federal award exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold of the recipient or subrecipient. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.214 outlines the suspension and debarment requirements for non-federal entities receiving federal funds. It mandates that these entities must not engage in "covered transactions" with individuals or organizations that are suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from participating in federal programs. Condition/Context: For one vendor, based on the services to be provided, management was required to issue a public notice solicitation in accordance with the required 2 CFR 200 regulations; however, such a notice was not solicited. Additionally, management did not perform a suspension and debarment check prior to work performed with the vendor. Cause: Due to the infrequency of entering into contracts above the simplified acquisition threshold, management was in the process of formally adopting a procurement policy and did not formalize the steps that would have included the procurement policy of the simplified acquisition threshold and formalize suspension and department checks. Effect: Grant funded contracts could be awarded to vendors that are less cost effective and suspended/debarred, which would be in violation of federal regulations and may result in the early termination of the grant award, non-reimbursement of grant funding, or cessation of future funding. Questioned Costs: None. Recommendation: Management should implement a formal policy outlining the procurement threshold and the requirement of a Suspension and debarment check in accordance with 2 CFR.200 requirements. Repeat Finding: No. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan.
FINDING 2024-005 Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls over Compliance and Noncompliance - Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Treasury Pass through Grantor: Multiple Federal Program(s): COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number(s): 21.027 Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.320 Procurement methods paragraph (b), formal procurement methods are required when the value of the procurement transaction under a federal award exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold of the recipient or subrecipient. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.214 outlines the suspension and debarment requirements for non-federal entities receiving federal funds. It mandates that these entities must not engage in "covered transactions" with individuals or organizations that are suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from participating in federal programs. Condition/Context: For one vendor, based on the services to be provided, management was required to issue a public notice solicitation in accordance with the required 2 CFR 200 regulations; however, such a notice was not solicited. Additionally, management did not perform a suspension and debarment check prior to work performed with the vendor. Cause: Due to the infrequency of entering into contracts above the simplified acquisition threshold, management was in the process of formally adopting a procurement policy and did not formalize the steps that would have included the procurement policy of the simplified acquisition threshold and formalize suspension and department checks. Effect: Grant funded contracts could be awarded to vendors that are less cost effective and suspended/debarred, which would be in violation of federal regulations and may result in the early termination of the grant award, non-reimbursement of grant funding, or cessation of future funding. Questioned Costs: None. Recommendation: Management should implement a formal policy outlining the procurement threshold and the requirement of a Suspension and debarment check in accordance with 2 CFR.200 requirements. Repeat Finding: No. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan.
FINDING 2024-005 Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls over Compliance and Noncompliance - Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Treasury Pass through Grantor: Multiple Federal Program(s): COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number(s): 21.027 Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.320 Procurement methods paragraph (b), formal procurement methods are required when the value of the procurement transaction under a federal award exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold of the recipient or subrecipient. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.214 outlines the suspension and debarment requirements for non-federal entities receiving federal funds. It mandates that these entities must not engage in "covered transactions" with individuals or organizations that are suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from participating in federal programs. Condition/Context: For one vendor, based on the services to be provided, management was required to issue a public notice solicitation in accordance with the required 2 CFR 200 regulations; however, such a notice was not solicited. Additionally, management did not perform a suspension and debarment check prior to work performed with the vendor. Cause: Due to the infrequency of entering into contracts above the simplified acquisition threshold, management was in the process of formally adopting a procurement policy and did not formalize the steps that would have included the procurement policy of the simplified acquisition threshold and formalize suspension and department checks. Effect: Grant funded contracts could be awarded to vendors that are less cost effective and suspended/debarred, which would be in violation of federal regulations and may result in the early termination of the grant award, non-reimbursement of grant funding, or cessation of future funding. Questioned Costs: None. Recommendation: Management should implement a formal policy outlining the procurement threshold and the requirement of a Suspension and debarment check in accordance with 2 CFR.200 requirements. Repeat Finding: No. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan.
FINDING 2024-005 Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls over Compliance and Noncompliance - Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Treasury Pass through Grantor: Multiple Federal Program(s): COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number(s): 21.027 Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.320 Procurement methods paragraph (b), formal procurement methods are required when the value of the procurement transaction under a federal award exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold of the recipient or subrecipient. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.214 outlines the suspension and debarment requirements for non-federal entities receiving federal funds. It mandates that these entities must not engage in "covered transactions" with individuals or organizations that are suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from participating in federal programs. Condition/Context: For one vendor, based on the services to be provided, management was required to issue a public notice solicitation in accordance with the required 2 CFR 200 regulations; however, such a notice was not solicited. Additionally, management did not perform a suspension and debarment check prior to work performed with the vendor. Cause: Due to the infrequency of entering into contracts above the simplified acquisition threshold, management was in the process of formally adopting a procurement policy and did not formalize the steps that would have included the procurement policy of the simplified acquisition threshold and formalize suspension and department checks. Effect: Grant funded contracts could be awarded to vendors that are less cost effective and suspended/debarred, which would be in violation of federal regulations and may result in the early termination of the grant award, non-reimbursement of grant funding, or cessation of future funding. Questioned Costs: None. Recommendation: Management should implement a formal policy outlining the procurement threshold and the requirement of a Suspension and debarment check in accordance with 2 CFR.200 requirements. Repeat Finding: No. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan.
FINDING 2024-005 Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls over Compliance and Noncompliance - Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Treasury Pass through Grantor: Multiple Federal Program(s): COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number(s): 21.027 Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.320 Procurement methods paragraph (b), formal procurement methods are required when the value of the procurement transaction under a federal award exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold of the recipient or subrecipient. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.214 outlines the suspension and debarment requirements for non-federal entities receiving federal funds. It mandates that these entities must not engage in "covered transactions" with individuals or organizations that are suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from participating in federal programs. Condition/Context: For one vendor, based on the services to be provided, management was required to issue a public notice solicitation in accordance with the required 2 CFR 200 regulations; however, such a notice was not solicited. Additionally, management did not perform a suspension and debarment check prior to work performed with the vendor. Cause: Due to the infrequency of entering into contracts above the simplified acquisition threshold, management was in the process of formally adopting a procurement policy and did not formalize the steps that would have included the procurement policy of the simplified acquisition threshold and formalize suspension and department checks. Effect: Grant funded contracts could be awarded to vendors that are less cost effective and suspended/debarred, which would be in violation of federal regulations and may result in the early termination of the grant award, non-reimbursement of grant funding, or cessation of future funding. Questioned Costs: None. Recommendation: Management should implement a formal policy outlining the procurement threshold and the requirement of a Suspension and debarment check in accordance with 2 CFR.200 requirements. Repeat Finding: No. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan.
FINDING 2024-005 Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls over Compliance and Noncompliance - Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Treasury Pass through Grantor: Multiple Federal Program(s): COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number(s): 21.027 Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.320 Procurement methods paragraph (b), formal procurement methods are required when the value of the procurement transaction under a federal award exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold of the recipient or subrecipient. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.214 outlines the suspension and debarment requirements for non-federal entities receiving federal funds. It mandates that these entities must not engage in "covered transactions" with individuals or organizations that are suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from participating in federal programs. Condition/Context: For one vendor, based on the services to be provided, management was required to issue a public notice solicitation in accordance with the required 2 CFR 200 regulations; however, such a notice was not solicited. Additionally, management did not perform a suspension and debarment check prior to work performed with the vendor. Cause: Due to the infrequency of entering into contracts above the simplified acquisition threshold, management was in the process of formally adopting a procurement policy and did not formalize the steps that would have included the procurement policy of the simplified acquisition threshold and formalize suspension and department checks. Effect: Grant funded contracts could be awarded to vendors that are less cost effective and suspended/debarred, which would be in violation of federal regulations and may result in the early termination of the grant award, non-reimbursement of grant funding, or cessation of future funding. Questioned Costs: None. Recommendation: Management should implement a formal policy outlining the procurement threshold and the requirement of a Suspension and debarment check in accordance with 2 CFR.200 requirements. Repeat Finding: No. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan.
FINDING 2024-005 Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls over Compliance and Noncompliance - Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Treasury Pass through Grantor: Multiple Federal Program(s): COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number(s): 21.027 Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.320 Procurement methods paragraph (b), formal procurement methods are required when the value of the procurement transaction under a federal award exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold of the recipient or subrecipient. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.214 outlines the suspension and debarment requirements for non-federal entities receiving federal funds. It mandates that these entities must not engage in "covered transactions" with individuals or organizations that are suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from participating in federal programs. Condition/Context: For one vendor, based on the services to be provided, management was required to issue a public notice solicitation in accordance with the required 2 CFR 200 regulations; however, such a notice was not solicited. Additionally, management did not perform a suspension and debarment check prior to work performed with the vendor. Cause: Due to the infrequency of entering into contracts above the simplified acquisition threshold, management was in the process of formally adopting a procurement policy and did not formalize the steps that would have included the procurement policy of the simplified acquisition threshold and formalize suspension and department checks. Effect: Grant funded contracts could be awarded to vendors that are less cost effective and suspended/debarred, which would be in violation of federal regulations and may result in the early termination of the grant award, non-reimbursement of grant funding, or cessation of future funding. Questioned Costs: None. Recommendation: Management should implement a formal policy outlining the procurement threshold and the requirement of a Suspension and debarment check in accordance with 2 CFR.200 requirements. Repeat Finding: No. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan.
FINDING 2024-005 Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls over Compliance and Noncompliance - Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Treasury Pass through Grantor: Multiple Federal Program(s): COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number(s): 21.027 Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.320 Procurement methods paragraph (b), formal procurement methods are required when the value of the procurement transaction under a federal award exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold of the recipient or subrecipient. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.214 outlines the suspension and debarment requirements for non-federal entities receiving federal funds. It mandates that these entities must not engage in "covered transactions" with individuals or organizations that are suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from participating in federal programs. Condition/Context: For one vendor, based on the services to be provided, management was required to issue a public notice solicitation in accordance with the required 2 CFR 200 regulations; however, such a notice was not solicited. Additionally, management did not perform a suspension and debarment check prior to work performed with the vendor. Cause: Due to the infrequency of entering into contracts above the simplified acquisition threshold, management was in the process of formally adopting a procurement policy and did not formalize the steps that would have included the procurement policy of the simplified acquisition threshold and formalize suspension and department checks. Effect: Grant funded contracts could be awarded to vendors that are less cost effective and suspended/debarred, which would be in violation of federal regulations and may result in the early termination of the grant award, non-reimbursement of grant funding, or cessation of future funding. Questioned Costs: None. Recommendation: Management should implement a formal policy outlining the procurement threshold and the requirement of a Suspension and debarment check in accordance with 2 CFR.200 requirements. Repeat Finding: No. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan.
FINDING 2024-005 Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls over Compliance and Noncompliance - Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Treasury Pass through Grantor: Multiple Federal Program(s): COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number(s): 21.027 Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.320 Procurement methods paragraph (b), formal procurement methods are required when the value of the procurement transaction under a federal award exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold of the recipient or subrecipient. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.214 outlines the suspension and debarment requirements for non-federal entities receiving federal funds. It mandates that these entities must not engage in "covered transactions" with individuals or organizations that are suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from participating in federal programs. Condition/Context: For one vendor, based on the services to be provided, management was required to issue a public notice solicitation in accordance with the required 2 CFR 200 regulations; however, such a notice was not solicited. Additionally, management did not perform a suspension and debarment check prior to work performed with the vendor. Cause: Due to the infrequency of entering into contracts above the simplified acquisition threshold, management was in the process of formally adopting a procurement policy and did not formalize the steps that would have included the procurement policy of the simplified acquisition threshold and formalize suspension and department checks. Effect: Grant funded contracts could be awarded to vendors that are less cost effective and suspended/debarred, which would be in violation of federal regulations and may result in the early termination of the grant award, non-reimbursement of grant funding, or cessation of future funding. Questioned Costs: None. Recommendation: Management should implement a formal policy outlining the procurement threshold and the requirement of a Suspension and debarment check in accordance with 2 CFR.200 requirements. Repeat Finding: No. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan.
FINDING 2024-005 Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls over Compliance and Noncompliance - Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Treasury Pass through Grantor: Multiple Federal Program(s): COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number(s): 21.027 Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.320 Procurement methods paragraph (b), formal procurement methods are required when the value of the procurement transaction under a federal award exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold of the recipient or subrecipient. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.214 outlines the suspension and debarment requirements for non-federal entities receiving federal funds. It mandates that these entities must not engage in "covered transactions" with individuals or organizations that are suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from participating in federal programs. Condition/Context: For one vendor, based on the services to be provided, management was required to issue a public notice solicitation in accordance with the required 2 CFR 200 regulations; however, such a notice was not solicited. Additionally, management did not perform a suspension and debarment check prior to work performed with the vendor. Cause: Due to the infrequency of entering into contracts above the simplified acquisition threshold, management was in the process of formally adopting a procurement policy and did not formalize the steps that would have included the procurement policy of the simplified acquisition threshold and formalize suspension and department checks. Effect: Grant funded contracts could be awarded to vendors that are less cost effective and suspended/debarred, which would be in violation of federal regulations and may result in the early termination of the grant award, non-reimbursement of grant funding, or cessation of future funding. Questioned Costs: None. Recommendation: Management should implement a formal policy outlining the procurement threshold and the requirement of a Suspension and debarment check in accordance with 2 CFR.200 requirements. Repeat Finding: No. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan.
FINDING 2024-005 Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls over Compliance and Noncompliance - Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Treasury Pass through Grantor: Multiple Federal Program(s): COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number(s): 21.027 Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.320 Procurement methods paragraph (b), formal procurement methods are required when the value of the procurement transaction under a federal award exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold of the recipient or subrecipient. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.214 outlines the suspension and debarment requirements for non-federal entities receiving federal funds. It mandates that these entities must not engage in "covered transactions" with individuals or organizations that are suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from participating in federal programs. Condition/Context: For one vendor, based on the services to be provided, management was required to issue a public notice solicitation in accordance with the required 2 CFR 200 regulations; however, such a notice was not solicited. Additionally, management did not perform a suspension and debarment check prior to work performed with the vendor. Cause: Due to the infrequency of entering into contracts above the simplified acquisition threshold, management was in the process of formally adopting a procurement policy and did not formalize the steps that would have included the procurement policy of the simplified acquisition threshold and formalize suspension and department checks. Effect: Grant funded contracts could be awarded to vendors that are less cost effective and suspended/debarred, which would be in violation of federal regulations and may result in the early termination of the grant award, non-reimbursement of grant funding, or cessation of future funding. Questioned Costs: None. Recommendation: Management should implement a formal policy outlining the procurement threshold and the requirement of a Suspension and debarment check in accordance with 2 CFR.200 requirements. Repeat Finding: No. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan.
FINDING 2024-005 Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls over Compliance and Noncompliance - Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Treasury Pass through Grantor: Multiple Federal Program(s): COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number(s): 21.027 Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.320 Procurement methods paragraph (b), formal procurement methods are required when the value of the procurement transaction under a federal award exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold of the recipient or subrecipient. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.214 outlines the suspension and debarment requirements for non-federal entities receiving federal funds. It mandates that these entities must not engage in "covered transactions" with individuals or organizations that are suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from participating in federal programs. Condition/Context: For one vendor, based on the services to be provided, management was required to issue a public notice solicitation in accordance with the required 2 CFR 200 regulations; however, such a notice was not solicited. Additionally, management did not perform a suspension and debarment check prior to work performed with the vendor. Cause: Due to the infrequency of entering into contracts above the simplified acquisition threshold, management was in the process of formally adopting a procurement policy and did not formalize the steps that would have included the procurement policy of the simplified acquisition threshold and formalize suspension and department checks. Effect: Grant funded contracts could be awarded to vendors that are less cost effective and suspended/debarred, which would be in violation of federal regulations and may result in the early termination of the grant award, non-reimbursement of grant funding, or cessation of future funding. Questioned Costs: None. Recommendation: Management should implement a formal policy outlining the procurement threshold and the requirement of a Suspension and debarment check in accordance with 2 CFR.200 requirements. Repeat Finding: No. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan.
FINDING 2024-005 Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls over Compliance and Noncompliance - Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Treasury Pass through Grantor: Multiple Federal Program(s): COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number(s): 21.027 Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.320 Procurement methods paragraph (b), formal procurement methods are required when the value of the procurement transaction under a federal award exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold of the recipient or subrecipient. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.214 outlines the suspension and debarment requirements for non-federal entities receiving federal funds. It mandates that these entities must not engage in "covered transactions" with individuals or organizations that are suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from participating in federal programs. Condition/Context: For one vendor, based on the services to be provided, management was required to issue a public notice solicitation in accordance with the required 2 CFR 200 regulations; however, such a notice was not solicited. Additionally, management did not perform a suspension and debarment check prior to work performed with the vendor. Cause: Due to the infrequency of entering into contracts above the simplified acquisition threshold, management was in the process of formally adopting a procurement policy and did not formalize the steps that would have included the procurement policy of the simplified acquisition threshold and formalize suspension and department checks. Effect: Grant funded contracts could be awarded to vendors that are less cost effective and suspended/debarred, which would be in violation of federal regulations and may result in the early termination of the grant award, non-reimbursement of grant funding, or cessation of future funding. Questioned Costs: None. Recommendation: Management should implement a formal policy outlining the procurement threshold and the requirement of a Suspension and debarment check in accordance with 2 CFR.200 requirements. Repeat Finding: No. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan.
FINDING 2024-005 Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls over Compliance and Noncompliance - Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Treasury Pass through Grantor: Multiple Federal Program(s): COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number(s): 21.027 Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.320 Procurement methods paragraph (b), formal procurement methods are required when the value of the procurement transaction under a federal award exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold of the recipient or subrecipient. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.214 outlines the suspension and debarment requirements for non-federal entities receiving federal funds. It mandates that these entities must not engage in "covered transactions" with individuals or organizations that are suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from participating in federal programs. Condition/Context: For one vendor, based on the services to be provided, management was required to issue a public notice solicitation in accordance with the required 2 CFR 200 regulations; however, such a notice was not solicited. Additionally, management did not perform a suspension and debarment check prior to work performed with the vendor. Cause: Due to the infrequency of entering into contracts above the simplified acquisition threshold, management was in the process of formally adopting a procurement policy and did not formalize the steps that would have included the procurement policy of the simplified acquisition threshold and formalize suspension and department checks. Effect: Grant funded contracts could be awarded to vendors that are less cost effective and suspended/debarred, which would be in violation of federal regulations and may result in the early termination of the grant award, non-reimbursement of grant funding, or cessation of future funding. Questioned Costs: None. Recommendation: Management should implement a formal policy outlining the procurement threshold and the requirement of a Suspension and debarment check in accordance with 2 CFR.200 requirements. Repeat Finding: No. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan.
FINDING 2024-005 Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls over Compliance and Noncompliance - Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Treasury Pass through Grantor: Multiple Federal Program(s): COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number(s): 21.027 Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.320 Procurement methods paragraph (b), formal procurement methods are required when the value of the procurement transaction under a federal award exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold of the recipient or subrecipient. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.214 outlines the suspension and debarment requirements for non-federal entities receiving federal funds. It mandates that these entities must not engage in "covered transactions" with individuals or organizations that are suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from participating in federal programs. Condition/Context: For one vendor, based on the services to be provided, management was required to issue a public notice solicitation in accordance with the required 2 CFR 200 regulations; however, such a notice was not solicited. Additionally, management did not perform a suspension and debarment check prior to work performed with the vendor. Cause: Due to the infrequency of entering into contracts above the simplified acquisition threshold, management was in the process of formally adopting a procurement policy and did not formalize the steps that would have included the procurement policy of the simplified acquisition threshold and formalize suspension and department checks. Effect: Grant funded contracts could be awarded to vendors that are less cost effective and suspended/debarred, which would be in violation of federal regulations and may result in the early termination of the grant award, non-reimbursement of grant funding, or cessation of future funding. Questioned Costs: None. Recommendation: Management should implement a formal policy outlining the procurement threshold and the requirement of a Suspension and debarment check in accordance with 2 CFR.200 requirements. Repeat Finding: No. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan.
FINDING 2024-005 Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls over Compliance and Noncompliance - Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Treasury Pass through Grantor: Multiple Federal Program(s): COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number(s): 21.027 Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.320 Procurement methods paragraph (b), formal procurement methods are required when the value of the procurement transaction under a federal award exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold of the recipient or subrecipient. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.214 outlines the suspension and debarment requirements for non-federal entities receiving federal funds. It mandates that these entities must not engage in "covered transactions" with individuals or organizations that are suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from participating in federal programs. Condition/Context: For one vendor, based on the services to be provided, management was required to issue a public notice solicitation in accordance with the required 2 CFR 200 regulations; however, such a notice was not solicited. Additionally, management did not perform a suspension and debarment check prior to work performed with the vendor. Cause: Due to the infrequency of entering into contracts above the simplified acquisition threshold, management was in the process of formally adopting a procurement policy and did not formalize the steps that would have included the procurement policy of the simplified acquisition threshold and formalize suspension and department checks. Effect: Grant funded contracts could be awarded to vendors that are less cost effective and suspended/debarred, which would be in violation of federal regulations and may result in the early termination of the grant award, non-reimbursement of grant funding, or cessation of future funding. Questioned Costs: None. Recommendation: Management should implement a formal policy outlining the procurement threshold and the requirement of a Suspension and debarment check in accordance with 2 CFR.200 requirements. Repeat Finding: No. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan.
FINDING 2024-005 Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls over Compliance and Noncompliance - Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Treasury Pass through Grantor: Multiple Federal Program(s): COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number(s): 21.027 Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.320 Procurement methods paragraph (b), formal procurement methods are required when the value of the procurement transaction under a federal award exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold of the recipient or subrecipient. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.214 outlines the suspension and debarment requirements for non-federal entities receiving federal funds. It mandates that these entities must not engage in "covered transactions" with individuals or organizations that are suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from participating in federal programs. Condition/Context: For one vendor, based on the services to be provided, management was required to issue a public notice solicitation in accordance with the required 2 CFR 200 regulations; however, such a notice was not solicited. Additionally, management did not perform a suspension and debarment check prior to work performed with the vendor. Cause: Due to the infrequency of entering into contracts above the simplified acquisition threshold, management was in the process of formally adopting a procurement policy and did not formalize the steps that would have included the procurement policy of the simplified acquisition threshold and formalize suspension and department checks. Effect: Grant funded contracts could be awarded to vendors that are less cost effective and suspended/debarred, which would be in violation of federal regulations and may result in the early termination of the grant award, non-reimbursement of grant funding, or cessation of future funding. Questioned Costs: None. Recommendation: Management should implement a formal policy outlining the procurement threshold and the requirement of a Suspension and debarment check in accordance with 2 CFR.200 requirements. Repeat Finding: No. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan.
FINDING 2024-005 Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls over Compliance and Noncompliance - Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Treasury Pass through Grantor: Multiple Federal Program(s): COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number(s): 21.027 Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.320 Procurement methods paragraph (b), formal procurement methods are required when the value of the procurement transaction under a federal award exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold of the recipient or subrecipient. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.214 outlines the suspension and debarment requirements for non-federal entities receiving federal funds. It mandates that these entities must not engage in "covered transactions" with individuals or organizations that are suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from participating in federal programs. Condition/Context: For one vendor, based on the services to be provided, management was required to issue a public notice solicitation in accordance with the required 2 CFR 200 regulations; however, such a notice was not solicited. Additionally, management did not perform a suspension and debarment check prior to work performed with the vendor. Cause: Due to the infrequency of entering into contracts above the simplified acquisition threshold, management was in the process of formally adopting a procurement policy and did not formalize the steps that would have included the procurement policy of the simplified acquisition threshold and formalize suspension and department checks. Effect: Grant funded contracts could be awarded to vendors that are less cost effective and suspended/debarred, which would be in violation of federal regulations and may result in the early termination of the grant award, non-reimbursement of grant funding, or cessation of future funding. Questioned Costs: None. Recommendation: Management should implement a formal policy outlining the procurement threshold and the requirement of a Suspension and debarment check in accordance with 2 CFR.200 requirements. Repeat Finding: No. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan.
FINDING 2024-005 Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls over Compliance and Noncompliance - Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Treasury Pass through Grantor: Multiple Federal Program(s): COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number(s): 21.027 Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.320 Procurement methods paragraph (b), formal procurement methods are required when the value of the procurement transaction under a federal award exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold of the recipient or subrecipient. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.214 outlines the suspension and debarment requirements for non-federal entities receiving federal funds. It mandates that these entities must not engage in "covered transactions" with individuals or organizations that are suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from participating in federal programs. Condition/Context: For one vendor, based on the services to be provided, management was required to issue a public notice solicitation in accordance with the required 2 CFR 200 regulations; however, such a notice was not solicited. Additionally, management did not perform a suspension and debarment check prior to work performed with the vendor. Cause: Due to the infrequency of entering into contracts above the simplified acquisition threshold, management was in the process of formally adopting a procurement policy and did not formalize the steps that would have included the procurement policy of the simplified acquisition threshold and formalize suspension and department checks. Effect: Grant funded contracts could be awarded to vendors that are less cost effective and suspended/debarred, which would be in violation of federal regulations and may result in the early termination of the grant award, non-reimbursement of grant funding, or cessation of future funding. Questioned Costs: None. Recommendation: Management should implement a formal policy outlining the procurement threshold and the requirement of a Suspension and debarment check in accordance with 2 CFR.200 requirements. Repeat Finding: No. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan.
FINDING 2024-005 Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls over Compliance and Noncompliance - Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Treasury Pass through Grantor: Multiple Federal Program(s): COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number(s): 21.027 Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.320 Procurement methods paragraph (b), formal procurement methods are required when the value of the procurement transaction under a federal award exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold of the recipient or subrecipient. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.214 outlines the suspension and debarment requirements for non-federal entities receiving federal funds. It mandates that these entities must not engage in "covered transactions" with individuals or organizations that are suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from participating in federal programs. Condition/Context: For one vendor, based on the services to be provided, management was required to issue a public notice solicitation in accordance with the required 2 CFR 200 regulations; however, such a notice was not solicited. Additionally, management did not perform a suspension and debarment check prior to work performed with the vendor. Cause: Due to the infrequency of entering into contracts above the simplified acquisition threshold, management was in the process of formally adopting a procurement policy and did not formalize the steps that would have included the procurement policy of the simplified acquisition threshold and formalize suspension and department checks. Effect: Grant funded contracts could be awarded to vendors that are less cost effective and suspended/debarred, which would be in violation of federal regulations and may result in the early termination of the grant award, non-reimbursement of grant funding, or cessation of future funding. Questioned Costs: None. Recommendation: Management should implement a formal policy outlining the procurement threshold and the requirement of a Suspension and debarment check in accordance with 2 CFR.200 requirements. Repeat Finding: No. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan.
FINDING 2024-005 Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls over Compliance and Noncompliance - Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Treasury Pass through Grantor: Multiple Federal Program(s): COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number(s): 21.027 Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.320 Procurement methods paragraph (b), formal procurement methods are required when the value of the procurement transaction under a federal award exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold of the recipient or subrecipient. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.214 outlines the suspension and debarment requirements for non-federal entities receiving federal funds. It mandates that these entities must not engage in "covered transactions" with individuals or organizations that are suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from participating in federal programs. Condition/Context: For one vendor, based on the services to be provided, management was required to issue a public notice solicitation in accordance with the required 2 CFR 200 regulations; however, such a notice was not solicited. Additionally, management did not perform a suspension and debarment check prior to work performed with the vendor. Cause: Due to the infrequency of entering into contracts above the simplified acquisition threshold, management was in the process of formally adopting a procurement policy and did not formalize the steps that would have included the procurement policy of the simplified acquisition threshold and formalize suspension and department checks. Effect: Grant funded contracts could be awarded to vendors that are less cost effective and suspended/debarred, which would be in violation of federal regulations and may result in the early termination of the grant award, non-reimbursement of grant funding, or cessation of future funding. Questioned Costs: None. Recommendation: Management should implement a formal policy outlining the procurement threshold and the requirement of a Suspension and debarment check in accordance with 2 CFR.200 requirements. Repeat Finding: No. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan.
FINDING 2024-005 Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls over Compliance and Noncompliance - Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Treasury Pass through Grantor: Multiple Federal Program(s): COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number(s): 21.027 Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.320 Procurement methods paragraph (b), formal procurement methods are required when the value of the procurement transaction under a federal award exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold of the recipient or subrecipient. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.214 outlines the suspension and debarment requirements for non-federal entities receiving federal funds. It mandates that these entities must not engage in "covered transactions" with individuals or organizations that are suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from participating in federal programs. Condition/Context: For one vendor, based on the services to be provided, management was required to issue a public notice solicitation in accordance with the required 2 CFR 200 regulations; however, such a notice was not solicited. Additionally, management did not perform a suspension and debarment check prior to work performed with the vendor. Cause: Due to the infrequency of entering into contracts above the simplified acquisition threshold, management was in the process of formally adopting a procurement policy and did not formalize the steps that would have included the procurement policy of the simplified acquisition threshold and formalize suspension and department checks. Effect: Grant funded contracts could be awarded to vendors that are less cost effective and suspended/debarred, which would be in violation of federal regulations and may result in the early termination of the grant award, non-reimbursement of grant funding, or cessation of future funding. Questioned Costs: None. Recommendation: Management should implement a formal policy outlining the procurement threshold and the requirement of a Suspension and debarment check in accordance with 2 CFR.200 requirements. Repeat Finding: No. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan.
FINDING 2024-005 Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls over Compliance and Noncompliance - Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Treasury Pass through Grantor: Multiple Federal Program(s): COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number(s): 21.027 Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.320 Procurement methods paragraph (b), formal procurement methods are required when the value of the procurement transaction under a federal award exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold of the recipient or subrecipient. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.214 outlines the suspension and debarment requirements for non-federal entities receiving federal funds. It mandates that these entities must not engage in "covered transactions" with individuals or organizations that are suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from participating in federal programs. Condition/Context: For one vendor, based on the services to be provided, management was required to issue a public notice solicitation in accordance with the required 2 CFR 200 regulations; however, such a notice was not solicited. Additionally, management did not perform a suspension and debarment check prior to work performed with the vendor. Cause: Due to the infrequency of entering into contracts above the simplified acquisition threshold, management was in the process of formally adopting a procurement policy and did not formalize the steps that would have included the procurement policy of the simplified acquisition threshold and formalize suspension and department checks. Effect: Grant funded contracts could be awarded to vendors that are less cost effective and suspended/debarred, which would be in violation of federal regulations and may result in the early termination of the grant award, non-reimbursement of grant funding, or cessation of future funding. Questioned Costs: None. Recommendation: Management should implement a formal policy outlining the procurement threshold and the requirement of a Suspension and debarment check in accordance with 2 CFR.200 requirements. Repeat Finding: No. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan.
Program Information: U.S. Department of the Interior Single Agreement – Assistance Listing #15.036 Award Number: A18AV00341 Award Period: 10/01/2023 – 9/30/2024 Criteria: Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200. Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. Per 2 CFR § 200.303 Internal controls, the non-federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition/Context: 1 of 3 procurement samples selected for testing had no documentation of bidding, alternative price quotes, or sole source documentation. Additionally, for 1 of 1 Individually Important Items and 2 of 2 suspension and debarment samples selected for testing, NWIFC could not provide support showing a SAM.gov check was performed prior to conducting business with the vendors. [ X ] Compliance Finding [ ] Significant Deficiency [ X ] Material Weakness Cause: It appears the policies and procedures for procurement and suspension and debarment were not followed. Effect: Without solicitation from an adequate number of qualified sources, NWIFC is at risk of over-spending on projects and, thus, leaving fewer resources available to fulfill the mission of NWIFC. Additionally, NWIFC could be subject to other sanctions from funding agencies if they determine that programs did not assure vendors were properly checked for suspension and debarment. Questioned Costs: $25,750 for procurement. This amount represents procurement transactions selected for testing that lacked required documentation of competitive bidding, price comparisons, or sole source justifications. As a result, these costs do not meet the allowability and procurement standards under 2 CFR 200.318–200.320 and are therefore questioned. Not applicable for suspension and debarment. While internal controls were not followed, no specific transactions were identified that violated the cost allowability requirements. Repeat Finding: Yes, finding #2023-003. Recommendation: We recommend that the NWIFC adhere to program policies and procedures as documented and supporting documentation is kept available for review. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared corrective action as detailed in its Corrective Action Plan.
Finding Number: 2024-010 Prior Year Finding Number: N/A Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Program: U.S. Department of the Treasury COVID-19 – Coronavirus Capital Projects Fund ALN: 21.029 Award #: CPFFN0167 Award Year: 02/09/2022 – 12/31/2026 Government Department/Agency: District of Columbia Public Library (DCPL) Criteria - The Uniform Guidance in 2 CFR Section 200.303 requires that non-Federal entities receiving Federal awards (i.e., auditee management) establish and maintain internal control designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal statues, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR Section 200.318(a), General Procurement Standards, the non-federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable State, local, and tribal laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal law and the standards identified in General Procurement Standards. Additionally, 2 CFR Section 200.318(i) states that the non-federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of the procurement. These records are required to include but are not necessarily limited to the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. All procurement transactions must be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition consistent in accordance with 2 CFR Section 200.319 and must be performed using the appropriate procurement method as outlined in 2 CFR Section 200.320. In accordance with 2 CFR Section 200.320(c), Noncompetitive procurement. There are specific circumstances in which the recipient or subrecipient may use a noncompetitive procurement method. The noncompetitive procurement method may only be used if one of the following circumstances applies: (1) The aggregate amount of the procurement transaction does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold (see paragraph (a)(1) of this section); (2) The procurement transaction can only be fulfilled by a single source; (3) The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from providing public notice of a competitive solicitation; (4) The recipient or subrecipient requests in writing to use a noncompetitive procurement method, and the Federal agency or pass-through entity provides written approval; or (5) After soliciting several sources, competition is determined inadequate. Condition – During our testing of procurement and suspension and debarment requirements, we examined the two (2) procurement contracts that comprised the entire procurement population. Based on the procedures performed, we identified one (1) contract, valued at $278,259, out of the two (2) contracts totaling $8,185,708, in which DCPL used a single source or sole source justification for the selection rationale. However, this justification did not comply with the requirements set forth in 2 CFR Section 200.320(c). Questioned Costs – Not determinable. Context – This is a condition identified per review of DCPL’s compliance with the specified requirements using a statistically valid sample. Effect – Failure to adhere to the procurement procedures specified in the Uniform Administrative Requirements may lead to the Federal agency disallowing the procurement and associated costs. Cause – While DCPL adhered to their policies and procedures for private expenditures, the agency did not adhere to federal procurement requirements (2 CFR Section 200.320(c)) listed above to support noncompetitive procurement on the requirements to use sole source. Recommendation – We recommend that management establish the requisite internal control policies and procedures to ensure that all procurements reported under the federal program are in compliance. Related Noncompliance – Noncompliance. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions – DCPL concurs with the auditor’s findings and recommendations. The District’s corrective action is described in the Management’s Corrective Action Plan included as Appendix B of the attached Management’s Section.
2024-001 (Significant Deficiency over Compliance): Insufficient Design of Procurement Policy Criteria: Under CFR 200.320, three types of procurement methods are outlined based on the dollar amount and nature of transactions. Condition: The Organization’s existing procurement policy outlines the three methods described under CFR 200.320. However, the policy does not incorporate sufficient monitoring procedures to ensure compliance with the procurement policy. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs associated with this finding. Effect: This error potentially resulted in the payment of higher prices for goods and services, violating federal procurement regulations. Recommendation: The Organization should strengthen its policies, training, and monitoring related to procurement to ensure compliance with CFR 200.320.
Criteria:Proper documentation is necessary in purchasing and procurement to ensure accountability, to prevent duplication of payments, and to detect fraud and prevent other errors from occurring.Condition:There were missing invoices and missing copies of check stubs. The fee accountant had to recreate financial records from the bank statements which included copies of canceled checks. In addition, contracts could not be located for maintenance contracts so it could not be determined if the amounts paid were in excess of contract amounts.Effect:Lack of proper documentation could result in undetected fraud, errors, and incomplete financial information.Cause:Lack of oversight by management and the Board.Recommendation:Invoices and other records should be safeguarded to prevent fraud and errors and to insure financial information is complete and accurate.Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions:We agree with the auditors' comments, and the following action will be taken to improve the situation. This situation was created when the previous administration removed all records and were not made available to the auditors after several requests. KMHA has taken the following actions:KMHA's Board has approved new written policies and procedures and are in place now.Appropriate staff have begun taking proper safeguards for purchasing and procurement actions to ensure proper accountability. The new policy addresses the three types of procurement under CFR 200.320 informal and formal procurement and noncompetitive procurement. Thresholds have been set for Micro purchases and thus simplified procurement under informal practices. Formal methods include Sealed bids and Proposals when sealed bids are not appropriate.All checks are handled in accordance with the new check writing policy and have the necessary documentation to support the purchase and is filed in such a manner to be available for future reviews. This documentation will be made available to the Authority's fee accountant.All procurement actions will be handled in accordance with the new procurement policy and CFR 200.
Finding 2024-004 – PROCUREMENT (repeat finding) Type: Material Weakness in Internal Control/Noncompliance. Program: ALN 93.493 Congressional Directives Grant Name: Access to Behavioral Crisis Services Grantor Number: FG-22-099 Criteria: Pursuant to 2 CFR 200.320, when a procurement transaction under a Federal award exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold, formal procurement methods are required. Pursuant to 2 CFR 200.214 and 2 CFR part 180, prior to entering into a covered transaction, a nonfederal entity must verify that the person with whom they intend to do business is not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded or disqualified.” Condition: The CMHSP did not follow the formal procurement methods outlined in 2 CFR 200.320 prior to entering into a contract for services under the grant. Also, the CMHSP did not verify that the vendor was not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded or disqualified in accordance with 2 CFR requirements prior to entering into a contract for services under the grant. Cause: This condition was caused by an insufficient internal control process for procurement including 1) requirement/review and approval of formal bid, and 2) review for suspension and debarment. Effect: The CMHSP purchased several items pursuant to a contract that did not go through a formal bid process or have evidence of review for suspension and debarment. Questioned Cost: $340,014 Context: One contract was paid from grant funds. The questioned cost shown above reflects the amount paid from grant funds for the year pursuant to this contract which did not go through a formal bid process or have evidence of review for suspension and debarment. Upon subsequent review, it was determined that the vendor was not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded or disqualified. Recommendation: We recommend that the CMHSP review their internal controls and make necessary changes to ensure that procurements adhere to the requirements of 2 CFR 200. Management’s Resp: We are in agreement with this finding.
Finding 2024-003 Procurement, Suspension and Debarment (Significant Deficiency) Information on the Federal Programs: Assistance Listing #15.657 Criteria or Specific Requirement: § 200.318 (i) General procurement standards, states that the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Furthermore: §200.320 (f) Methods of procurement to be followed, states that procurement by noncompetitive proposals is procurement through solicitation of a proposal from only one source and may be used only when certain requirements have been met. Additionally, §200.213 Reporting a determination that a non-Federal entity is not qualified for a Federal award states that non-Federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. These regulations restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. The non- Federal entity must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified, by (a) checking SAM Exclusions; (b) collecting a certification from that person; (c) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person.Condition: During our audit, we noted contractual relationships under the Federal awards for which evidence of procurement procedures and documentation of SAM Exclusion checks were unavailable for our inspection. It is our understanding that some contracts were procured under noncompetitive (sole source) justification. However, in certain instances we were unable to review documentation detailing the history and rationale of the procurements. Cause: The Organization's processes in place during 2024 did not provide for the formalization and retention of procurement records and vendor screenings consistent with the expectations outlined in 2 CFR 200. Additionally, the Organization does not have a formal policy in place related to contractor screenings under CFR §200.213. Effect or Potential Effect: Purchases of goods and services could be made above the prevailing market rates if the prescribed procurement procedures are not adhered to. Additionally, the Organization may have inadvertently selected noncompetitive proposals method when the circumstances did not meet the requirements noted in § 200.320 (f) Methods of procurement to be followed, and thereby failing to administer full and open competition as required by the regulations. Finally, the Organization could inadvertently enter into a contractual relationship with an entity that is suspended, debarred or otherwise included on the US Federal sanction list. Questioned Costs: N/A Context: The Organization failed to adhere to its procurement policy, and hence, noncompliance with Federal standards. Our audit work in this area consisted of internal control testwork over a random sample of expenditures. We consider our samples to be representative of the respective populations, and thus, are statistically valid samples. Identification as a Repeat Finding, if Applicable: Yes, continuation of Finding 2023-003 Recommendation: We then recommend that the Organization ensure its policy is distributed and communicated in a formal manner to its employees, and that management properly enforce compliance with its policy. All procurement actions should be clearly documented in writing and maintained in the vendor or contractor files. We also recommend that the Organization enhance its existing policy related to noncompetitive procurement to ensure include the five specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used under CFR 200.320. Additionally, we recommend that the Organization enhance its policies to include screening procedures related to 200.213 Reporting a determination that a non-Federal entity is not qualified for a Federal award.
Finding 2024-003 Procurement, Suspension and Debarment (Significant Deficiency) Information on the Federal Programs: Assistance Listing #15.657 Criteria or Specific Requirement: § 200.318 (i) General procurement standards, states that the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Furthermore: §200.320 (f) Methods of procurement to be followed, states that procurement by noncompetitive proposals is procurement through solicitation of a proposal from only one source and may be used only when certain requirements have been met. Additionally, §200.213 Reporting a determination that a non-Federal entity is not qualified for a Federal award states that non-Federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. These regulations restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. The non- Federal entity must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified, by (a) checking SAM Exclusions; (b) collecting a certification from that person; (c) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person.Condition: During our audit, we noted contractual relationships under the Federal awards for which evidence of procurement procedures and documentation of SAM Exclusion checks were unavailable for our inspection. It is our understanding that some contracts were procured under noncompetitive (sole source) justification. However, in certain instances we were unable to review documentation detailing the history and rationale of the procurements. Cause: The Organization's processes in place during 2024 did not provide for the formalization and retention of procurement records and vendor screenings consistent with the expectations outlined in 2 CFR 200. Additionally, the Organization does not have a formal policy in place related to contractor screenings under CFR §200.213. Effect or Potential Effect: Purchases of goods and services could be made above the prevailing market rates if the prescribed procurement procedures are not adhered to. Additionally, the Organization may have inadvertently selected noncompetitive proposals method when the circumstances did not meet the requirements noted in § 200.320 (f) Methods of procurement to be followed, and thereby failing to administer full and open competition as required by the regulations. Finally, the Organization could inadvertently enter into a contractual relationship with an entity that is suspended, debarred or otherwise included on the US Federal sanction list. Questioned Costs: N/A Context: The Organization failed to adhere to its procurement policy, and hence, noncompliance with Federal standards. Our audit work in this area consisted of internal control testwork over a random sample of expenditures. We consider our samples to be representative of the respective populations, and thus, are statistically valid samples. Identification as a Repeat Finding, if Applicable: Yes, continuation of Finding 2023-003 Recommendation: We then recommend that the Organization ensure its policy is distributed and communicated in a formal manner to its employees, and that management properly enforce compliance with its policy. All procurement actions should be clearly documented in writing and maintained in the vendor or contractor files. We also recommend that the Organization enhance its existing policy related to noncompetitive procurement to ensure include the five specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used under CFR 200.320. Additionally, we recommend that the Organization enhance its policies to include screening procedures related to 200.213 Reporting a determination that a non-Federal entity is not qualified for a Federal award.
Finding 2024-003 Procurement, Suspension and Debarment (Significant Deficiency) Information on the Federal Programs: Assistance Listing #15.657 Criteria or Specific Requirement: § 200.318 (i) General procurement standards, states that the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Furthermore: §200.320 (f) Methods of procurement to be followed, states that procurement by noncompetitive proposals is procurement through solicitation of a proposal from only one source and may be used only when certain requirements have been met. Additionally, §200.213 Reporting a determination that a non-Federal entity is not qualified for a Federal award states that non-Federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. These regulations restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. The non- Federal entity must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified, by (a) checking SAM Exclusions; (b) collecting a certification from that person; (c) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person.Condition: During our audit, we noted contractual relationships under the Federal awards for which evidence of procurement procedures and documentation of SAM Exclusion checks were unavailable for our inspection. It is our understanding that some contracts were procured under noncompetitive (sole source) justification. However, in certain instances we were unable to review documentation detailing the history and rationale of the procurements. Cause: The Organization's processes in place during 2024 did not provide for the formalization and retention of procurement records and vendor screenings consistent with the expectations outlined in 2 CFR 200. Additionally, the Organization does not have a formal policy in place related to contractor screenings under CFR §200.213. Effect or Potential Effect: Purchases of goods and services could be made above the prevailing market rates if the prescribed procurement procedures are not adhered to. Additionally, the Organization may have inadvertently selected noncompetitive proposals method when the circumstances did not meet the requirements noted in § 200.320 (f) Methods of procurement to be followed, and thereby failing to administer full and open competition as required by the regulations. Finally, the Organization could inadvertently enter into a contractual relationship with an entity that is suspended, debarred or otherwise included on the US Federal sanction list. Questioned Costs: N/A Context: The Organization failed to adhere to its procurement policy, and hence, noncompliance with Federal standards. Our audit work in this area consisted of internal control testwork over a random sample of expenditures. We consider our samples to be representative of the respective populations, and thus, are statistically valid samples. Identification as a Repeat Finding, if Applicable: Yes, continuation of Finding 2023-003 Recommendation: We then recommend that the Organization ensure its policy is distributed and communicated in a formal manner to its employees, and that management properly enforce compliance with its policy. All procurement actions should be clearly documented in writing and maintained in the vendor or contractor files. We also recommend that the Organization enhance its existing policy related to noncompetitive procurement to ensure include the five specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used under CFR 200.320. Additionally, we recommend that the Organization enhance its policies to include screening procedures related to 200.213 Reporting a determination that a non-Federal entity is not qualified for a Federal award.
Finding 2024-003 Procurement, Suspension and Debarment (Significant Deficiency) Information on the Federal Programs: Assistance Listing #15.657 Criteria or Specific Requirement: § 200.318 (i) General procurement standards, states that the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Furthermore: §200.320 (f) Methods of procurement to be followed, states that procurement by noncompetitive proposals is procurement through solicitation of a proposal from only one source and may be used only when certain requirements have been met. Additionally, §200.213 Reporting a determination that a non-Federal entity is not qualified for a Federal award states that non-Federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. These regulations restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. The non- Federal entity must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified, by (a) checking SAM Exclusions; (b) collecting a certification from that person; (c) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person.Condition: During our audit, we noted contractual relationships under the Federal awards for which evidence of procurement procedures and documentation of SAM Exclusion checks were unavailable for our inspection. It is our understanding that some contracts were procured under noncompetitive (sole source) justification. However, in certain instances we were unable to review documentation detailing the history and rationale of the procurements. Cause: The Organization's processes in place during 2024 did not provide for the formalization and retention of procurement records and vendor screenings consistent with the expectations outlined in 2 CFR 200. Additionally, the Organization does not have a formal policy in place related to contractor screenings under CFR §200.213. Effect or Potential Effect: Purchases of goods and services could be made above the prevailing market rates if the prescribed procurement procedures are not adhered to. Additionally, the Organization may have inadvertently selected noncompetitive proposals method when the circumstances did not meet the requirements noted in § 200.320 (f) Methods of procurement to be followed, and thereby failing to administer full and open competition as required by the regulations. Finally, the Organization could inadvertently enter into a contractual relationship with an entity that is suspended, debarred or otherwise included on the US Federal sanction list. Questioned Costs: N/A Context: The Organization failed to adhere to its procurement policy, and hence, noncompliance with Federal standards. Our audit work in this area consisted of internal control testwork over a random sample of expenditures. We consider our samples to be representative of the respective populations, and thus, are statistically valid samples. Identification as a Repeat Finding, if Applicable: Yes, continuation of Finding 2023-003 Recommendation: We then recommend that the Organization ensure its policy is distributed and communicated in a formal manner to its employees, and that management properly enforce compliance with its policy. All procurement actions should be clearly documented in writing and maintained in the vendor or contractor files. We also recommend that the Organization enhance its existing policy related to noncompetitive procurement to ensure include the five specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used under CFR 200.320. Additionally, we recommend that the Organization enhance its policies to include screening procedures related to 200.213 Reporting a determination that a non-Federal entity is not qualified for a Federal award.
Finding 2024-003 Procurement, Suspension and Debarment (Significant Deficiency) Information on the Federal Programs: Assistance Listing #15.657 Criteria or Specific Requirement: § 200.318 (i) General procurement standards, states that the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Furthermore: §200.320 (f) Methods of procurement to be followed, states that procurement by noncompetitive proposals is procurement through solicitation of a proposal from only one source and may be used only when certain requirements have been met. Additionally, §200.213 Reporting a determination that a non-Federal entity is not qualified for a Federal award states that non-Federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. These regulations restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. The non- Federal entity must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified, by (a) checking SAM Exclusions; (b) collecting a certification from that person; (c) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person.Condition: During our audit, we noted contractual relationships under the Federal awards for which evidence of procurement procedures and documentation of SAM Exclusion checks were unavailable for our inspection. It is our understanding that some contracts were procured under noncompetitive (sole source) justification. However, in certain instances we were unable to review documentation detailing the history and rationale of the procurements. Cause: The Organization's processes in place during 2024 did not provide for the formalization and retention of procurement records and vendor screenings consistent with the expectations outlined in 2 CFR 200. Additionally, the Organization does not have a formal policy in place related to contractor screenings under CFR §200.213. Effect or Potential Effect: Purchases of goods and services could be made above the prevailing market rates if the prescribed procurement procedures are not adhered to. Additionally, the Organization may have inadvertently selected noncompetitive proposals method when the circumstances did not meet the requirements noted in § 200.320 (f) Methods of procurement to be followed, and thereby failing to administer full and open competition as required by the regulations. Finally, the Organization could inadvertently enter into a contractual relationship with an entity that is suspended, debarred or otherwise included on the US Federal sanction list. Questioned Costs: N/A Context: The Organization failed to adhere to its procurement policy, and hence, noncompliance with Federal standards. Our audit work in this area consisted of internal control testwork over a random sample of expenditures. We consider our samples to be representative of the respective populations, and thus, are statistically valid samples. Identification as a Repeat Finding, if Applicable: Yes, continuation of Finding 2023-003 Recommendation: We then recommend that the Organization ensure its policy is distributed and communicated in a formal manner to its employees, and that management properly enforce compliance with its policy. All procurement actions should be clearly documented in writing and maintained in the vendor or contractor files. We also recommend that the Organization enhance its existing policy related to noncompetitive procurement to ensure include the five specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used under CFR 200.320. Additionally, we recommend that the Organization enhance its policies to include screening procedures related to 200.213 Reporting a determination that a non-Federal entity is not qualified for a Federal award.
Finding 2024-003 Procurement, Suspension and Debarment (Significant Deficiency) Information on the Federal Programs: Assistance Listing #15.657 Criteria or Specific Requirement: § 200.318 (i) General procurement standards, states that the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Furthermore: §200.320 (f) Methods of procurement to be followed, states that procurement by noncompetitive proposals is procurement through solicitation of a proposal from only one source and may be used only when certain requirements have been met. Additionally, §200.213 Reporting a determination that a non-Federal entity is not qualified for a Federal award states that non-Federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. These regulations restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. The non- Federal entity must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified, by (a) checking SAM Exclusions; (b) collecting a certification from that person; (c) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person.Condition: During our audit, we noted contractual relationships under the Federal awards for which evidence of procurement procedures and documentation of SAM Exclusion checks were unavailable for our inspection. It is our understanding that some contracts were procured under noncompetitive (sole source) justification. However, in certain instances we were unable to review documentation detailing the history and rationale of the procurements. Cause: The Organization's processes in place during 2024 did not provide for the formalization and retention of procurement records and vendor screenings consistent with the expectations outlined in 2 CFR 200. Additionally, the Organization does not have a formal policy in place related to contractor screenings under CFR §200.213. Effect or Potential Effect: Purchases of goods and services could be made above the prevailing market rates if the prescribed procurement procedures are not adhered to. Additionally, the Organization may have inadvertently selected noncompetitive proposals method when the circumstances did not meet the requirements noted in § 200.320 (f) Methods of procurement to be followed, and thereby failing to administer full and open competition as required by the regulations. Finally, the Organization could inadvertently enter into a contractual relationship with an entity that is suspended, debarred or otherwise included on the US Federal sanction list. Questioned Costs: N/A Context: The Organization failed to adhere to its procurement policy, and hence, noncompliance with Federal standards. Our audit work in this area consisted of internal control testwork over a random sample of expenditures. We consider our samples to be representative of the respective populations, and thus, are statistically valid samples. Identification as a Repeat Finding, if Applicable: Yes, continuation of Finding 2023-003 Recommendation: We then recommend that the Organization ensure its policy is distributed and communicated in a formal manner to its employees, and that management properly enforce compliance with its policy. All procurement actions should be clearly documented in writing and maintained in the vendor or contractor files. We also recommend that the Organization enhance its existing policy related to noncompetitive procurement to ensure include the five specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used under CFR 200.320. Additionally, we recommend that the Organization enhance its policies to include screening procedures related to 200.213 Reporting a determination that a non-Federal entity is not qualified for a Federal award.
Finding 2024-003 Procurement, Suspension and Debarment (Significant Deficiency) Information on the Federal Programs: Assistance Listing #15.657 Criteria or Specific Requirement: § 200.318 (i) General procurement standards, states that the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Furthermore: §200.320 (f) Methods of procurement to be followed, states that procurement by noncompetitive proposals is procurement through solicitation of a proposal from only one source and may be used only when certain requirements have been met. Additionally, §200.213 Reporting a determination that a non-Federal entity is not qualified for a Federal award states that non-Federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. These regulations restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. The non- Federal entity must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified, by (a) checking SAM Exclusions; (b) collecting a certification from that person; (c) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person.Condition: During our audit, we noted contractual relationships under the Federal awards for which evidence of procurement procedures and documentation of SAM Exclusion checks were unavailable for our inspection. It is our understanding that some contracts were procured under noncompetitive (sole source) justification. However, in certain instances we were unable to review documentation detailing the history and rationale of the procurements. Cause: The Organization's processes in place during 2024 did not provide for the formalization and retention of procurement records and vendor screenings consistent with the expectations outlined in 2 CFR 200. Additionally, the Organization does not have a formal policy in place related to contractor screenings under CFR §200.213. Effect or Potential Effect: Purchases of goods and services could be made above the prevailing market rates if the prescribed procurement procedures are not adhered to. Additionally, the Organization may have inadvertently selected noncompetitive proposals method when the circumstances did not meet the requirements noted in § 200.320 (f) Methods of procurement to be followed, and thereby failing to administer full and open competition as required by the regulations. Finally, the Organization could inadvertently enter into a contractual relationship with an entity that is suspended, debarred or otherwise included on the US Federal sanction list. Questioned Costs: N/A Context: The Organization failed to adhere to its procurement policy, and hence, noncompliance with Federal standards. Our audit work in this area consisted of internal control testwork over a random sample of expenditures. We consider our samples to be representative of the respective populations, and thus, are statistically valid samples. Identification as a Repeat Finding, if Applicable: Yes, continuation of Finding 2023-003 Recommendation: We then recommend that the Organization ensure its policy is distributed and communicated in a formal manner to its employees, and that management properly enforce compliance with its policy. All procurement actions should be clearly documented in writing and maintained in the vendor or contractor files. We also recommend that the Organization enhance its existing policy related to noncompetitive procurement to ensure include the five specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used under CFR 200.320. Additionally, we recommend that the Organization enhance its policies to include screening procedures related to 200.213 Reporting a determination that a non-Federal entity is not qualified for a Federal award.
2024-002 Procurement Space Operations Assistance Listing Number: 43.007 Federal Award ID Number: 80JSC018M0005 National Aeronautics and Space Administration 2024 Funding, Repeat Finding Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 provides that non-Federal entities must establish and maintain effective internal controls to provide reasonable assurance of compliance with Uniform Guidance. 2 CFR Section 200.320 and 48 CFR section 52.244-5 sets forth the requirements for acquisition contracts awarded to vendors including the requirement to obtain price or rate quotations from an adequate number of qualified sources and the circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement methods can be used. Also, CASIS’s procurement policy states that it is in both CASIS and NASA’s interest to compete when it makes sense regardless of the threshold and can be achieved by obtaining three quotes, i.e., comparative shopping. A minimum of 3 vendors are required to demonstrate competition. CASIS may solicit a proposal from only one source in circumstances where one or more of the following conditions apply (FAR Subpart 6.3): (i) The item or service is available only from a single source. supplies or services to be procured immediately. (iii) NASA specifically authorizes the use of noncompetitive proposals (directed source). (iv) After consultation with a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate. (v) The vendor is listed as a sole source provider under the Cooperative Agreement. Condition: Sole source determination was not documented for two vendors. Cause: For two legal expenses tested in the sample, no documentation of this being a sole source purchase prior to expending the funds. Effect: If CASIS cannot demonstrate that procurement of services were properly sole sourced, this may result in questioned costs and funds being returned to NASA. Questioned Costs: Known questioned costs of $41,762 and likely questioned costs of $90,024. Perspective: There were 2 out of 60 expenses selected for which the control failed. Recommendation: Non-competitive procurement should be documented and approved prior to incurring expenses. Management Response: CASIS acknowledges the error documenting these procurements. The two legal service vendors had been discussed internally and the selections rationalized based on the specialty of the professional services required for leasing and employment matters. Unfortunately, the documentation was not completed and stored as required by our internal policies. We consider these costs to be both necessary and reasonable, as we were negotiating a new office space lease and the rates were consistent with other legal service providers that CASIS has procured. CASIS plans on reinforcing the procurement documentation requirements with our personnel through additional training and reminding that engagement letters need to go through our document review software.
Failure to Follow Procurement Policy Finding 2024-002 Condition: The Authority did not comply with the current procurement policy as procedures were not fully followed and forms required by the Authority’s procurement policy were not completed for the heating ventilation and cooling project, new roof, and electric vehicle charging stations. The following forms required by either 2 CFR 200 and/or the Authority’s own procurement policy were not completed for the current year capital asset purchases: Written Record of Procurement Checklist Form, Method of Procurement Decision Matrix, Advertisement and Solicitation Form, Bid Quotations, Fewer Than 3 Offers Received Evaluation if applicable, Proposal Tabulation, Certification of Compliance with Federal Clauses for the assets less than $25,000, and Responsibility Determination (sam.gov debarred verification). Criteria: The following requirements are documented in 2 CFR 200-Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards. 2 CFR 200.214 Suspension and Debarment Non-Federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. 2 CFR Part 200.318 General Procurement Standards (a) The Non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. (i) the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. 2 CFR 200.320 Methods of Procurement to be Followed (b) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. 2 CFR 200.324 Contract Cost and Price (a) The Non-Federal entity must perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold including contract modifications. The method and degree of analysis is dependent on the facts surrounding the particular procurement situation, but as a starting point, the non-Federal entity must make independent estimates before receiving bids or proposals. Concurrently, the Authority’s did not comply with its own current procurement policy as it did not follow or prepare the required documentation detailed in the following sections. Procurement Requests-The Authority will maintain sufficient records to detail the history of a procurement. Such records shall include method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection (or rejection), and the contract price. The Authority will treat any prospective contractor or sub-contractor listed on a centralized State government debarment and suspension list as nonresponsible and ineligible for contract award. Debarment and Suspension- The Authority will treat any prospective contractor or sub-contractor listed on a centralized State government debarment and suspension list as non-responsible and ineligible for contract awards. To see if a prospective contractor is eligible, we will look on the website www.SAM.gov and when the bid has been received. Methods of Procurement- a. Micro and Emergency Purchases (do not exceed $10,000)-(a) A written determination as to why price is deemed fair and reasonable must be on file with each purchase made under this method of procurement using Micro-Purchase Price Reasonableness Determination Form. (b) Splitting of procurements to avoid the competitive procurement requirements of federal and state statues shall not be condoned. b. Small Purchase Procurement ($10,000 to $250,000)-(a) A minimum of two price or rate quotations shall be obtained from qualified sources; (b) The procurement will be made from the lowest priced qualified bid, if products or goods are equal; (c) MDOT requires for procurements under $25,000.00. Included Procurement Appendix A, B, E, F, G, H, or I and Vehicle Specification certification if applies. (d) MDOT requires for procurements over $25,000.00 solicitations, including specifications and written selection procedures (lowest bids), Include Procurement Appendix A, F, G, H or I and Vehicle Specification certification if applies. Third Party Contracts with applicable clauses and bond documents must be included. Cause: The Authority did not follow its own procurement policy. Effect: The Authority is noncompliant with 2 CFR 200 and its own procurement policy. Directive: We direct the Authority review and update its procurement policy and implement procedures to ensure that the Authority is complying with the federal requirements, required forms are being completed, and documentation is being maintained. Management’s Response--Corrective Action Plan: Contact person is Todd Shurn, Executive Director, 275 East Wall Street, P.O. Box 837, Benton Harbor, Michigan 49023. Telephone (269) 927-2268. The Authority acknowledges the finding and is currently working to correct this.
Failure to Follow Procurement Policy Finding 2024-002 Condition: The Authority did not comply with the current procurement policy as procedures were not fully followed and forms required by the Authority’s procurement policy were not completed for the heating ventilation and cooling project, new roof, and electric vehicle charging stations. The following forms required by either 2 CFR 200 and/or the Authority’s own procurement policy were not completed for the current year capital asset purchases: Written Record of Procurement Checklist Form, Method of Procurement Decision Matrix, Advertisement and Solicitation Form, Bid Quotations, Fewer Than 3 Offers Received Evaluation if applicable, Proposal Tabulation, Certification of Compliance with Federal Clauses for the assets less than $25,000, and Responsibility Determination (sam.gov debarred verification). Criteria: The following requirements are documented in 2 CFR 200-Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards. 2 CFR 200.214 Suspension and Debarment Non-Federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. 2 CFR Part 200.318 General Procurement Standards (a) The Non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. (i) the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. 2 CFR 200.320 Methods of Procurement to be Followed (b) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. 2 CFR 200.324 Contract Cost and Price (a) The Non-Federal entity must perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold including contract modifications. The method and degree of analysis is dependent on the facts surrounding the particular procurement situation, but as a starting point, the non-Federal entity must make independent estimates before receiving bids or proposals. Concurrently, the Authority’s did not comply with its own current procurement policy as it did not follow or prepare the required documentation detailed in the following sections. Procurement Requests-The Authority will maintain sufficient records to detail the history of a procurement. Such records shall include method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection (or rejection), and the contract price. The Authority will treat any prospective contractor or sub-contractor listed on a centralized State government debarment and suspension list as nonresponsible and ineligible for contract award. Debarment and Suspension- The Authority will treat any prospective contractor or sub-contractor listed on a centralized State government debarment and suspension list as non-responsible and ineligible for contract awards. To see if a prospective contractor is eligible, we will look on the website www.SAM.gov and when the bid has been received. Methods of Procurement- a. Micro and Emergency Purchases (do not exceed $10,000)-(a) A written determination as to why price is deemed fair and reasonable must be on file with each purchase made under this method of procurement using Micro-Purchase Price Reasonableness Determination Form. (b) Splitting of procurements to avoid the competitive procurement requirements of federal and state statues shall not be condoned. b. Small Purchase Procurement ($10,000 to $250,000)-(a) A minimum of two price or rate quotations shall be obtained from qualified sources; (b) The procurement will be made from the lowest priced qualified bid, if products or goods are equal; (c) MDOT requires for procurements under $25,000.00. Included Procurement Appendix A, B, E, F, G, H, or I and Vehicle Specification certification if applies. (d) MDOT requires for procurements over $25,000.00 solicitations, including specifications and written selection procedures (lowest bids), Include Procurement Appendix A, F, G, H or I and Vehicle Specification certification if applies. Third Party Contracts with applicable clauses and bond documents must be included. Cause: The Authority did not follow its own procurement policy. Effect: The Authority is noncompliant with 2 CFR 200 and its own procurement policy. Directive: We direct the Authority review and update its procurement policy and implement procedures to ensure that the Authority is complying with the federal requirements, required forms are being completed, and documentation is being maintained. Management’s Response--Corrective Action Plan: Contact person is Todd Shurn, Executive Director, 275 East Wall Street, P.O. Box 837, Benton Harbor, Michigan 49023. Telephone (269) 927-2268. The Authority acknowledges the finding and is currently working to correct this.
Failure to Follow Procurement Policy Finding 2024-002 Condition: The Authority did not comply with the current procurement policy as procedures were not fully followed and forms required by the Authority’s procurement policy were not completed for the heating ventilation and cooling project, new roof, and electric vehicle charging stations. The following forms required by either 2 CFR 200 and/or the Authority’s own procurement policy were not completed for the current year capital asset purchases: Written Record of Procurement Checklist Form, Method of Procurement Decision Matrix, Advertisement and Solicitation Form, Bid Quotations, Fewer Than 3 Offers Received Evaluation if applicable, Proposal Tabulation, Certification of Compliance with Federal Clauses for the assets less than $25,000, and Responsibility Determination (sam.gov debarred verification). Criteria: The following requirements are documented in 2 CFR 200-Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards. 2 CFR 200.214 Suspension and Debarment Non-Federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. 2 CFR Part 200.318 General Procurement Standards (a) The Non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. (i) the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. 2 CFR 200.320 Methods of Procurement to be Followed (b) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. 2 CFR 200.324 Contract Cost and Price (a) The Non-Federal entity must perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold including contract modifications. The method and degree of analysis is dependent on the facts surrounding the particular procurement situation, but as a starting point, the non-Federal entity must make independent estimates before receiving bids or proposals. Concurrently, the Authority’s did not comply with its own current procurement policy as it did not follow or prepare the required documentation detailed in the following sections. Procurement Requests-The Authority will maintain sufficient records to detail the history of a procurement. Such records shall include method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection (or rejection), and the contract price. The Authority will treat any prospective contractor or sub-contractor listed on a centralized State government debarment and suspension list as nonresponsible and ineligible for contract award. Debarment and Suspension- The Authority will treat any prospective contractor or sub-contractor listed on a centralized State government debarment and suspension list as non-responsible and ineligible for contract awards. To see if a prospective contractor is eligible, we will look on the website www.SAM.gov and when the bid has been received. Methods of Procurement- a. Micro and Emergency Purchases (do not exceed $10,000)-(a) A written determination as to why price is deemed fair and reasonable must be on file with each purchase made under this method of procurement using Micro-Purchase Price Reasonableness Determination Form. (b) Splitting of procurements to avoid the competitive procurement requirements of federal and state statues shall not be condoned. b. Small Purchase Procurement ($10,000 to $250,000)-(a) A minimum of two price or rate quotations shall be obtained from qualified sources; (b) The procurement will be made from the lowest priced qualified bid, if products or goods are equal; (c) MDOT requires for procurements under $25,000.00. Included Procurement Appendix A, B, E, F, G, H, or I and Vehicle Specification certification if applies. (d) MDOT requires for procurements over $25,000.00 solicitations, including specifications and written selection procedures (lowest bids), Include Procurement Appendix A, F, G, H or I and Vehicle Specification certification if applies. Third Party Contracts with applicable clauses and bond documents must be included. Cause: The Authority did not follow its own procurement policy. Effect: The Authority is noncompliant with 2 CFR 200 and its own procurement policy. Directive: We direct the Authority review and update its procurement policy and implement procedures to ensure that the Authority is complying with the federal requirements, required forms are being completed, and documentation is being maintained. Management’s Response--Corrective Action Plan: Contact person is Todd Shurn, Executive Director, 275 East Wall Street, P.O. Box 837, Benton Harbor, Michigan 49023. Telephone (269) 927-2268. The Authority acknowledges the finding and is currently working to correct this.
Failure to Follow Procurement Policy Finding 2024-002 Condition: The Authority did not comply with the current procurement policy as procedures were not fully followed and forms required by the Authority’s procurement policy were not completed for the heating ventilation and cooling project, new roof, and electric vehicle charging stations. The following forms required by either 2 CFR 200 and/or the Authority’s own procurement policy were not completed for the current year capital asset purchases: Written Record of Procurement Checklist Form, Method of Procurement Decision Matrix, Advertisement and Solicitation Form, Bid Quotations, Fewer Than 3 Offers Received Evaluation if applicable, Proposal Tabulation, Certification of Compliance with Federal Clauses for the assets less than $25,000, and Responsibility Determination (sam.gov debarred verification). Criteria: The following requirements are documented in 2 CFR 200-Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards. 2 CFR 200.214 Suspension and Debarment Non-Federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. 2 CFR Part 200.318 General Procurement Standards (a) The Non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. (i) the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. 2 CFR 200.320 Methods of Procurement to be Followed (b) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. 2 CFR 200.324 Contract Cost and Price (a) The Non-Federal entity must perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold including contract modifications. The method and degree of analysis is dependent on the facts surrounding the particular procurement situation, but as a starting point, the non-Federal entity must make independent estimates before receiving bids or proposals. Concurrently, the Authority’s did not comply with its own current procurement policy as it did not follow or prepare the required documentation detailed in the following sections. Procurement Requests-The Authority will maintain sufficient records to detail the history of a procurement. Such records shall include method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection (or rejection), and the contract price. The Authority will treat any prospective contractor or sub-contractor listed on a centralized State government debarment and suspension list as nonresponsible and ineligible for contract award. Debarment and Suspension- The Authority will treat any prospective contractor or sub-contractor listed on a centralized State government debarment and suspension list as non-responsible and ineligible for contract awards. To see if a prospective contractor is eligible, we will look on the website www.SAM.gov and when the bid has been received. Methods of Procurement- a. Micro and Emergency Purchases (do not exceed $10,000)-(a) A written determination as to why price is deemed fair and reasonable must be on file with each purchase made under this method of procurement using Micro-Purchase Price Reasonableness Determination Form. (b) Splitting of procurements to avoid the competitive procurement requirements of federal and state statues shall not be condoned. b. Small Purchase Procurement ($10,000 to $250,000)-(a) A minimum of two price or rate quotations shall be obtained from qualified sources; (b) The procurement will be made from the lowest priced qualified bid, if products or goods are equal; (c) MDOT requires for procurements under $25,000.00. Included Procurement Appendix A, B, E, F, G, H, or I and Vehicle Specification certification if applies. (d) MDOT requires for procurements over $25,000.00 solicitations, including specifications and written selection procedures (lowest bids), Include Procurement Appendix A, F, G, H or I and Vehicle Specification certification if applies. Third Party Contracts with applicable clauses and bond documents must be included. Cause: The Authority did not follow its own procurement policy. Effect: The Authority is noncompliant with 2 CFR 200 and its own procurement policy. Directive: We direct the Authority review and update its procurement policy and implement procedures to ensure that the Authority is complying with the federal requirements, required forms are being completed, and documentation is being maintained. Management’s Response--Corrective Action Plan: Contact person is Todd Shurn, Executive Director, 275 East Wall Street, P.O. Box 837, Benton Harbor, Michigan 49023. Telephone (269) 927-2268. The Authority acknowledges the finding and is currently working to correct this.
Failure to Follow Procurement Policy Finding 2024-002 Condition: The Authority did not comply with the current procurement policy as procedures were not fully followed and forms required by the Authority’s procurement policy were not completed for the heating ventilation and cooling project, new roof, and electric vehicle charging stations. The following forms required by either 2 CFR 200 and/or the Authority’s own procurement policy were not completed for the current year capital asset purchases: Written Record of Procurement Checklist Form, Method of Procurement Decision Matrix, Advertisement and Solicitation Form, Bid Quotations, Fewer Than 3 Offers Received Evaluation if applicable, Proposal Tabulation, Certification of Compliance with Federal Clauses for the assets less than $25,000, and Responsibility Determination (sam.gov debarred verification). Criteria: The following requirements are documented in 2 CFR 200-Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards. 2 CFR 200.214 Suspension and Debarment Non-Federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. 2 CFR Part 200.318 General Procurement Standards (a) The Non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. (i) the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. 2 CFR 200.320 Methods of Procurement to be Followed (b) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. 2 CFR 200.324 Contract Cost and Price (a) The Non-Federal entity must perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold including contract modifications. The method and degree of analysis is dependent on the facts surrounding the particular procurement situation, but as a starting point, the non-Federal entity must make independent estimates before receiving bids or proposals. Concurrently, the Authority’s did not comply with its own current procurement policy as it did not follow or prepare the required documentation detailed in the following sections. Procurement Requests-The Authority will maintain sufficient records to detail the history of a procurement. Such records shall include method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection (or rejection), and the contract price. The Authority will treat any prospective contractor or sub-contractor listed on a centralized State government debarment and suspension list as nonresponsible and ineligible for contract award. Debarment and Suspension- The Authority will treat any prospective contractor or sub-contractor listed on a centralized State government debarment and suspension list as non-responsible and ineligible for contract awards. To see if a prospective contractor is eligible, we will look on the website www.SAM.gov and when the bid has been received. Methods of Procurement- a. Micro and Emergency Purchases (do not exceed $10,000)-(a) A written determination as to why price is deemed fair and reasonable must be on file with each purchase made under this method of procurement using Micro-Purchase Price Reasonableness Determination Form. (b) Splitting of procurements to avoid the competitive procurement requirements of federal and state statues shall not be condoned. b. Small Purchase Procurement ($10,000 to $250,000)-(a) A minimum of two price or rate quotations shall be obtained from qualified sources; (b) The procurement will be made from the lowest priced qualified bid, if products or goods are equal; (c) MDOT requires for procurements under $25,000.00. Included Procurement Appendix A, B, E, F, G, H, or I and Vehicle Specification certification if applies. (d) MDOT requires for procurements over $25,000.00 solicitations, including specifications and written selection procedures (lowest bids), Include Procurement Appendix A, F, G, H or I and Vehicle Specification certification if applies. Third Party Contracts with applicable clauses and bond documents must be included. Cause: The Authority did not follow its own procurement policy. Effect: The Authority is noncompliant with 2 CFR 200 and its own procurement policy. Directive: We direct the Authority review and update its procurement policy and implement procedures to ensure that the Authority is complying with the federal requirements, required forms are being completed, and documentation is being maintained. Management’s Response--Corrective Action Plan: Contact person is Todd Shurn, Executive Director, 275 East Wall Street, P.O. Box 837, Benton Harbor, Michigan 49023. Telephone (269) 927-2268. The Authority acknowledges the finding and is currently working to correct this.
Failure to Follow Procurement Policy Finding 2024-002 Condition: The Authority did not comply with the current procurement policy as procedures were not fully followed and forms required by the Authority’s procurement policy were not completed for the heating ventilation and cooling project, new roof, and electric vehicle charging stations. The following forms required by either 2 CFR 200 and/or the Authority’s own procurement policy were not completed for the current year capital asset purchases: Written Record of Procurement Checklist Form, Method of Procurement Decision Matrix, Advertisement and Solicitation Form, Bid Quotations, Fewer Than 3 Offers Received Evaluation if applicable, Proposal Tabulation, Certification of Compliance with Federal Clauses for the assets less than $25,000, and Responsibility Determination (sam.gov debarred verification). Criteria: The following requirements are documented in 2 CFR 200-Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards. 2 CFR 200.214 Suspension and Debarment Non-Federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. 2 CFR Part 200.318 General Procurement Standards (a) The Non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. (i) the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. 2 CFR 200.320 Methods of Procurement to be Followed (b) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. 2 CFR 200.324 Contract Cost and Price (a) The Non-Federal entity must perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold including contract modifications. The method and degree of analysis is dependent on the facts surrounding the particular procurement situation, but as a starting point, the non-Federal entity must make independent estimates before receiving bids or proposals. Concurrently, the Authority’s did not comply with its own current procurement policy as it did not follow or prepare the required documentation detailed in the following sections. Procurement Requests-The Authority will maintain sufficient records to detail the history of a procurement. Such records shall include method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection (or rejection), and the contract price. The Authority will treat any prospective contractor or sub-contractor listed on a centralized State government debarment and suspension list as nonresponsible and ineligible for contract award. Debarment and Suspension- The Authority will treat any prospective contractor or sub-contractor listed on a centralized State government debarment and suspension list as non-responsible and ineligible for contract awards. To see if a prospective contractor is eligible, we will look on the website www.SAM.gov and when the bid has been received. Methods of Procurement- a. Micro and Emergency Purchases (do not exceed $10,000)-(a) A written determination as to why price is deemed fair and reasonable must be on file with each purchase made under this method of procurement using Micro-Purchase Price Reasonableness Determination Form. (b) Splitting of procurements to avoid the competitive procurement requirements of federal and state statues shall not be condoned. b. Small Purchase Procurement ($10,000 to $250,000)-(a) A minimum of two price or rate quotations shall be obtained from qualified sources; (b) The procurement will be made from the lowest priced qualified bid, if products or goods are equal; (c) MDOT requires for procurements under $25,000.00. Included Procurement Appendix A, B, E, F, G, H, or I and Vehicle Specification certification if applies. (d) MDOT requires for procurements over $25,000.00 solicitations, including specifications and written selection procedures (lowest bids), Include Procurement Appendix A, F, G, H or I and Vehicle Specification certification if applies. Third Party Contracts with applicable clauses and bond documents must be included. Cause: The Authority did not follow its own procurement policy. Effect: The Authority is noncompliant with 2 CFR 200 and its own procurement policy. Directive: We direct the Authority review and update its procurement policy and implement procedures to ensure that the Authority is complying with the federal requirements, required forms are being completed, and documentation is being maintained. Management’s Response--Corrective Action Plan: Contact person is Todd Shurn, Executive Director, 275 East Wall Street, P.O. Box 837, Benton Harbor, Michigan 49023. Telephone (269) 927-2268. The Authority acknowledges the finding and is currently working to correct this.
Failure to Follow Procurement Policy Finding 2024-002 Condition: The Authority did not comply with the current procurement policy as procedures were not fully followed and forms required by the Authority’s procurement policy were not completed for the heating ventilation and cooling project, new roof, and electric vehicle charging stations. The following forms required by either 2 CFR 200 and/or the Authority’s own procurement policy were not completed for the current year capital asset purchases: Written Record of Procurement Checklist Form, Method of Procurement Decision Matrix, Advertisement and Solicitation Form, Bid Quotations, Fewer Than 3 Offers Received Evaluation if applicable, Proposal Tabulation, Certification of Compliance with Federal Clauses for the assets less than $25,000, and Responsibility Determination (sam.gov debarred verification). Criteria: The following requirements are documented in 2 CFR 200-Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards. 2 CFR 200.214 Suspension and Debarment Non-Federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. 2 CFR Part 200.318 General Procurement Standards (a) The Non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. (i) the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. 2 CFR 200.320 Methods of Procurement to be Followed (b) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. 2 CFR 200.324 Contract Cost and Price (a) The Non-Federal entity must perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold including contract modifications. The method and degree of analysis is dependent on the facts surrounding the particular procurement situation, but as a starting point, the non-Federal entity must make independent estimates before receiving bids or proposals. Concurrently, the Authority’s did not comply with its own current procurement policy as it did not follow or prepare the required documentation detailed in the following sections. Procurement Requests-The Authority will maintain sufficient records to detail the history of a procurement. Such records shall include method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection (or rejection), and the contract price. The Authority will treat any prospective contractor or sub-contractor listed on a centralized State government debarment and suspension list as nonresponsible and ineligible for contract award. Debarment and Suspension- The Authority will treat any prospective contractor or sub-contractor listed on a centralized State government debarment and suspension list as non-responsible and ineligible for contract awards. To see if a prospective contractor is eligible, we will look on the website www.SAM.gov and when the bid has been received. Methods of Procurement- a. Micro and Emergency Purchases (do not exceed $10,000)-(a) A written determination as to why price is deemed fair and reasonable must be on file with each purchase made under this method of procurement using Micro-Purchase Price Reasonableness Determination Form. (b) Splitting of procurements to avoid the competitive procurement requirements of federal and state statues shall not be condoned. b. Small Purchase Procurement ($10,000 to $250,000)-(a) A minimum of two price or rate quotations shall be obtained from qualified sources; (b) The procurement will be made from the lowest priced qualified bid, if products or goods are equal; (c) MDOT requires for procurements under $25,000.00. Included Procurement Appendix A, B, E, F, G, H, or I and Vehicle Specification certification if applies. (d) MDOT requires for procurements over $25,000.00 solicitations, including specifications and written selection procedures (lowest bids), Include Procurement Appendix A, F, G, H or I and Vehicle Specification certification if applies. Third Party Contracts with applicable clauses and bond documents must be included. Cause: The Authority did not follow its own procurement policy. Effect: The Authority is noncompliant with 2 CFR 200 and its own procurement policy. Directive: We direct the Authority review and update its procurement policy and implement procedures to ensure that the Authority is complying with the federal requirements, required forms are being completed, and documentation is being maintained. Management’s Response--Corrective Action Plan: Contact person is Todd Shurn, Executive Director, 275 East Wall Street, P.O. Box 837, Benton Harbor, Michigan 49023. Telephone (269) 927-2268. The Authority acknowledges the finding and is currently working to correct this.
Reference Number: 2024-002 Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension/Debarment Type of Finding: Compliance Internal Control Impact: Significant Deficiency Compliance Impact: Nonmaterial Noncompliance AL Number(s) and Title(s): 10.553 and 10.555 – Child Nutrition Cluster Federal Awarding Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Federal Award Number: 255AL322N1199 Pass-through Entity: Alabama Department of Education Pass-through Award Number: None Questioned Costs: $62,778.22 Child Nutrition Cluster funds were used to pay $62,778.22 for services and supplies without obtaining required quotes. The U. S. Code of Federal Regulations Title 2, Part 200.320(a), of the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) states that the recipient or subrecipient is responsible for determining and documenting an appropriate micro-purchase threshold based on internal controls, an evaluation of risk, and its documented procurement procedures. The Board’s documented procurement procedures state that the procurement transactions for federal programs and child nutrition programs that are not subject to the state procurement laws but exceed the aggregate amount of the federal micro-purchase threshold of $10,000 will be obtained by utilizing price or rate quotes from two or more qualified sources. Septic tank services, equipment maintenance/repair services, and kitchen supplies in the amount of $62,778.22 were paid from Child Nutrition Cluster funds. The Board failed to obtain price or rate quotes from an adequate number of qualified sources during the audit period. As a result, the Board failed to comply with the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, 2 CFR 320(a). Recommendation: The Board should comply with the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) 2 CFR 200.320 by following its documented procurement procedures. Views of Responsible Officials of the Auditee Management agrees with this finding and will take corrective actions.
Reference Number: 2024-002 Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension/Debarment Type of Finding: Compliance Internal Control Impact: Significant Deficiency Compliance Impact: Nonmaterial Noncompliance AL Number(s) and Title(s): 10.553 and 10.555 – Child Nutrition Cluster Federal Awarding Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Federal Award Number: 255AL322N1199 Pass-through Entity: Alabama Department of Education Pass-through Award Number: None Questioned Costs: $62,778.22 Child Nutrition Cluster funds were used to pay $62,778.22 for services and supplies without obtaining required quotes. The U. S. Code of Federal Regulations Title 2, Part 200.320(a), of the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) states that the recipient or subrecipient is responsible for determining and documenting an appropriate micro-purchase threshold based on internal controls, an evaluation of risk, and its documented procurement procedures. The Board’s documented procurement procedures state that the procurement transactions for federal programs and child nutrition programs that are not subject to the state procurement laws but exceed the aggregate amount of the federal micro-purchase threshold of $10,000 will be obtained by utilizing price or rate quotes from two or more qualified sources. Septic tank services, equipment maintenance/repair services, and kitchen supplies in the amount of $62,778.22 were paid from Child Nutrition Cluster funds. The Board failed to obtain price or rate quotes from an adequate number of qualified sources during the audit period. As a result, the Board failed to comply with the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, 2 CFR 320(a). Recommendation: The Board should comply with the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) 2 CFR 200.320 by following its documented procurement procedures. Views of Responsible Officials of the Auditee Management agrees with this finding and will take corrective actions.
2024-001 Finding Type Material Weakness, Noncompliance Federal Program Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, ALN #21.027 Criteria Pursuant to 2 CFR §200.320, federal funds must be managed in a manner that ensures full and open competition. The procurement method used for each transaction must be appropriate based on the dollar amount and conditions. Condition During our testing, we noted that the Organization did not obtain price quotes prior to selecting a vendor whose expenditures exceeded the micro-purchase threshold. Cause The Organization has the proper procurement policies in place. However, due to a short timeframe for the project, an individual within the Organization’s management did not comply with the policy in an attempt to expedite the project’s completion. The Organization’s internal controls failed to detect and correct the noncompliance. The individual in management who made this decision is no longer employed at the Organization; therefore, documentation on the matter is insufficient and current management is unaware of the communications that occurred with the grantor concerning the timing of gathering price quotes and the necessity to expedite the process. Effect The Organization incurred expenditures of $182,483 that were not in compliance with procurement standards. Questioned Costs $182,483 Identification of a Repeat Finding This is not a repeat finding from the prior year’s audit. Recommendation We recommend the Organization has an additional responsible party who has knowledge of federal procurement requirements review all projects to ensure compliance. Additionally, all correspondence with the grantor regarding deviations from these requirements should be maintained, including evidence of grantor pre-approval. Response As noted in the corrective action plan, management agrees with this finding.
2024-001 Finding Type Material Weakness, Noncompliance Federal Program Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, ALN #21.027 Criteria Pursuant to 2 CFR §200.320, federal funds must be managed in a manner that ensures full and open competition. The procurement method used for each transaction must be appropriate based on the dollar amount and conditions. Condition During our testing, we noted that the Organization did not obtain price quotes prior to selecting a vendor whose expenditures exceeded the micro-purchase threshold. Cause The Organization has the proper procurement policies in place. However, due to a short timeframe for the project, an individual within the Organization’s management did not comply with the policy in an attempt to expedite the project’s completion. The Organization’s internal controls failed to detect and correct the noncompliance. The individual in management who made this decision is no longer employed at the Organization; therefore, documentation on the matter is insufficient and current management is unaware of the communications that occurred with the grantor concerning the timing of gathering price quotes and the necessity to expedite the process. Effect The Organization incurred expenditures of $182,483 that were not in compliance with procurement standards. Questioned Costs $182,483 Identification of a Repeat Finding This is not a repeat finding from the prior year’s audit. Recommendation We recommend the Organization has an additional responsible party who has knowledge of federal procurement requirements review all projects to ensure compliance. Additionally, all correspondence with the grantor regarding deviations from these requirements should be maintained, including evidence of grantor pre-approval. Response As noted in the corrective action plan, management agrees with this finding.
2024-001 Finding Type Material Weakness, Noncompliance Federal Program Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, ALN #21.027 Criteria Pursuant to 2 CFR §200.320, federal funds must be managed in a manner that ensures full and open competition. The procurement method used for each transaction must be appropriate based on the dollar amount and conditions. Condition During our testing, we noted that the Organization did not obtain price quotes prior to selecting a vendor whose expenditures exceeded the micro-purchase threshold. Cause The Organization has the proper procurement policies in place. However, due to a short timeframe for the project, an individual within the Organization’s management did not comply with the policy in an attempt to expedite the project’s completion. The Organization’s internal controls failed to detect and correct the noncompliance. The individual in management who made this decision is no longer employed at the Organization; therefore, documentation on the matter is insufficient and current management is unaware of the communications that occurred with the grantor concerning the timing of gathering price quotes and the necessity to expedite the process. Effect The Organization incurred expenditures of $182,483 that were not in compliance with procurement standards. Questioned Costs $182,483 Identification of a Repeat Finding This is not a repeat finding from the prior year’s audit. Recommendation We recommend the Organization has an additional responsible party who has knowledge of federal procurement requirements review all projects to ensure compliance. Additionally, all correspondence with the grantor regarding deviations from these requirements should be maintained, including evidence of grantor pre-approval. Response As noted in the corrective action plan, management agrees with this finding.
2024-001 Finding Type Material Weakness, Noncompliance Federal Program Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, ALN #21.027 Criteria Pursuant to 2 CFR §200.320, federal funds must be managed in a manner that ensures full and open competition. The procurement method used for each transaction must be appropriate based on the dollar amount and conditions. Condition During our testing, we noted that the Organization did not obtain price quotes prior to selecting a vendor whose expenditures exceeded the micro-purchase threshold. Cause The Organization has the proper procurement policies in place. However, due to a short timeframe for the project, an individual within the Organization’s management did not comply with the policy in an attempt to expedite the project’s completion. The Organization’s internal controls failed to detect and correct the noncompliance. The individual in management who made this decision is no longer employed at the Organization; therefore, documentation on the matter is insufficient and current management is unaware of the communications that occurred with the grantor concerning the timing of gathering price quotes and the necessity to expedite the process. Effect The Organization incurred expenditures of $182,483 that were not in compliance with procurement standards. Questioned Costs $182,483 Identification of a Repeat Finding This is not a repeat finding from the prior year’s audit. Recommendation We recommend the Organization has an additional responsible party who has knowledge of federal procurement requirements review all projects to ensure compliance. Additionally, all correspondence with the grantor regarding deviations from these requirements should be maintained, including evidence of grantor pre-approval. Response As noted in the corrective action plan, management agrees with this finding.