Findings Citing § 200.320

FINDING 2024-003 Subject: Water and Waste Disposal Systems for Rural Communities - Procurement Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Program: Water and Waste Disposal Systems for Rural Communities Assistance Listings Number: 10.760 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 92-02, 92-03, 92-04, 92-05 Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context As part of sound management of the federal award, the City was responsible for implementing a system of internal controls that would ensure compliance with the applicable requirements. The City had not properly designed or implemented such a system, which would include appropriate segregation of duties, that would likely be effective in preventing, or detecting and correcting, noncompliance. Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000 unless a lower, more restrictive threshold is set by a nonfederal entity. The State of Indiana has established a more restrictive threshold of $150,000 for informal procurement methods. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds: micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Small purchase procedures require that price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources or documented reasoning to support a single source provider. Two vendors were identified that were paid $10,500 and $59,408, respectively, during the audit period using federal funds under the award, thereby requiring small purchase procedures for both procurements. Both vendors were selected for testing. The City was unable to provide any documentation for either vendor that the procurement method used was appropriate or that the procurement provided full and open competition or rationale to support the determination to limit competition. Additionally, the history of the procurement, including the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of the vendor, and the basis for the price, was not adequately documented for either vendor. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318 states in part: "(a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. . . . (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. . . ." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use document procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases- (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . . (c) Noncompetitive procurement. There are specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. Noncompetitive procurement can only be awarded if one or more of the following circumstances apply: (1) The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold (see paragraph (a)(1) of this section); (2) The item is available only from a single source; (3) The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from publicizing a competitive solicitation; (4) The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity expressly authorizes a noncompetitive procurement in response to a written request from the non-Federal entity; or (5) After solicitation of a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate." Cause The vendors in question had been utilized by the City for various services over the course of multiple years, including for several years under this award with the ongoing multi-year project. For continuity purposes, the City chose to limit competition when procuring the services. The City included the requirements for limiting competition in its purchasing policy but did not follow the established policy. Effect Without a proper system of internal controls in place that operated effectively, noncompliance remained undetected. As a result, proper procurement procedures were not adhered to for all vendors. Without following the required methods for procurement, the City could be overpaying for services by not receiving the most competitive pricing. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the City. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the City's management establish a proper system of internal controls to ensure expenditures made from federal awards use the appropriate procurement method and retain the documentation to support the procurement methods used in order to ensure compliance with the terms and conditions of the federal award. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.

Finding 2024-002 Failure to Follow Procurement Policy Type of Finding Noncompliance and Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Condition The Organization maintains a procurement policy that establishes spending thresholds and outlines the requirements for obtaining rate quotations at each of these levels. During audit procedures, it was noted that the Organization did not follow the policy’s requirements for obtaining and documenting rate quotations for two of the transactions reviewed. The Organization explained that the vendor was considered a unique partner, and competition was intentionally limited based on the specialized nature of the services provided. However, no documentation was retained to justify this decision to limit competition, as required by federal procurement standards. The absence of such documentation resulted in questioned costs for these transactions. Criteria: Federal regulations require non-federal entities to maintain written procurement procedures that are consistent with applicable laws and standards, including the requirement to conduct procurement transactions in a manner that provides full and open competition, except in limited circumstances, as specifically defined in 2 CFR 200.320. When competition is restricted, entities are required to document the basis for their determination, including the rationale for selecting a particular vendor. Additionally, entities must maintain documentation to support procurement actions and decisions to ensure compliance with applicable requirements. Cause This issue appears to stem from a lack of adherence to the Organization’s procurement policy and an underdeveloped process for documenting exceptions to competitive procurement requirements. While management considered the vendor relationship justified, there was no formal documentation of the rationale, resulting in noncompliance with both internal policy and federal procurement requirements. Possible of Known Effect As a result of this deficiency, the Organization cannot demonstrate that the procurement process complied with the federal requirements under 2 CFR 200.320, nor can it substantiate its rationale for limiting competition. This lack of documentation increases the risk of unsupported or inappropriate expenditures, and in this instance, led to questioned costs related to the two transactions tested. Questioned Costs Known questioned costs of $29,164 were identified. Repeat Finding This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation We recommend that the Organization strengthen its procurement practices by ensuring that all procurements, including those where competition is intentionally limited, are fully documented in accordance with federal requirements and the Organization’s procurement policy. Documentation should include the rationale for limiting competition and evidence of compliance with the applicable procurement threshold requirements. Implementing a review process to ensure procurement files are complete prior to payment or grant charging would further reduce the risk of noncompliance. Views of Responsible Officials Prior to the award of ARPA grant funding in 2023, the Organization did not have a formal procurement policy in place. Implementation of such a policy was required to receive the award. At the time of implementation, however, partnerships had already been established and were identified in the original grant proposal. With respect to legal services, the Organization engaged the two primary organizations in Indianapolis that provide expungement assistance. Indiana Legal Services ("ILS") was the first entity contacted, but after multiple attempts, no response was received from the designated point of contact. Subsequently, the Organization engaged with another nonprofit organization, which responded promptly and agreed to serve as a partner under the grant. For grant compliance services, the Organization engaged a third party. This decision was based on recommendations from community partners, as well as her demonstrated work quality, professional reliability, and commitment to serving the target population.

Compliance Requirement Procurement Type of Finding Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance, Material Noncompliance Program Port Security Grant Program ALN# 97.056 Federal Agency Department of Homeland Security – Direct Award Federal Award Year 2020, 2021, 2022 and 2023 Grant Number EMW-2020-PU-00079 – IJ#1, IJ#3, IJ #4 EMW-2021-PU-00030 – IJ#1, IJ#3 EMW-2022-PU-00022 – IJ#1, IJ#2, EMW-2023-PU-00164 – IJ#1, IJ#2, IJ#3, IJ#4 EMW-2024-PU-05541 – IJ#4 Questioned Costs $463,460 Criteria - Federal rules require grant recipients to follow strict purchasing standards. This includes seeking fair and open competition when buying goods or services, obtaining bids or quotes once purchases reach certain dollar thresholds, and verifying that vendors are not suspended or barred from receiving federal funds through the SAM.gov system. Federal rules set strict procurement standards that the District must follow: • 2 CFR 200.318 – Requires non-federal entities to maintain oversight to ensure contractors perform in accordance with the terms, conditions, and specifications of their contracts. • 2 CFR 200.319 – Requires full and open competition in all procurement transactions. • 2 CFR 200.320 – Establishes methods of procurement, including micro-purchases, small purchases, sealed bids, competitive proposals, and noncompetitive proposals. • 2 CFR 200.323 – Requires cost or price analysis for procurements above the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. • 2 CFR 200.213 – Requires checks for suspension and debarment (SAM.gov).Under Louisiana law, political subdivisions such as ports are also subject to state purchasing thresholds: (a) $0 – $9,999: Purchases may be made directly but must be reasonable and properly documented. (b) $10,000 – $60,000: At least three (3) telephone or written quotations are required, with documentation kept on file. (c) Over $60,000: A formal advertised public bid process is required in compliance with Louisiana Public Bid Law. For professional services, the District is required to follow competitive selection processes consistent with their policies, Louisiana state law and federal guidance, ensuring fair opportunity, transparency, and reasonable pricing. Condition - The District failed to comply with federal procurement standards in multiple areas, indicating a pervasive breakdown in procurement controls and noncompliance with 2 CFR 200.318–.327. a) The District did not obtain competitive bids for the camera purchases and installation, resulting in questioned costs of $234,217 b) For professional services contracts funded by the PSGP, relating the IT services, engineering and consulting services, and GIS implantation services, the District did not maintain records documenting requests for price quotes or maintain records demonstrating the reasonableness of costs. Resulting in questioned costs of $305,657. c) For all ten (10) vendors tested under the Port Security Grant Program, the District did not retain documentation demonstrating that SAM.gov suspension and debarment verifications were performed prior to award or payment. Cause - The District failed to enforce federally required procurement standards and did not maintain sufficient documentation to demonstrate compliance. This deficiency reflects a significant weakness in procurement oversight and a lack of management attention to ensuring adherence with federal regulations governing competition, cost reasonableness, and vendor selection. Effect - Because the District did not obtain the required bids, quotes, or suspension and debarment checks, it cannot demonstrate compliance with federal procurement standards. This failure increases the risk of waste, favoritism, or contracting with ineligible vendors, and resulted in questioned costs as calculated by the auditor.Recommendation - The District must consistently apply written procurement policies that require competitive bids or price quotes for all purchases and professional services. Documentation of price reasonableness must be retained for every procurement action to ensure compliance with 2 CFR 200.318–.327 The District must document SAM.gov suspension and debarment verification for all vendors and contractors prior to contract execution or payment. This documentation must be maintained in the procurement file. The District must consult with FEMA regarding the allowability of identified questioned costs.

Finding 2024-004 Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance and Noncompliance – Procurement Identification of the federal program Agencies Award Numbers ALN 15.022 Tribal Self Governance ` Department of Interior GT-OSGT812- Year 2013 GT-OSGT812- Year 2017 GT-OSGT812- Year 2018 GT-OSGT812- Year 2019 GT-OSGT812- Year 2020 GT-OSGT812- Year 2021 GT-OSGT812- Year 2022 GT-OSGT812- Year 2023 GT-OSGT812- Year 2024 GT-OSGT812- Year 2025 Criteria The Uniform Guidance in 2 CFR Section 200.320(b), Procurement Methods – Small Purchase, is required if the aggregate dollar amount of the procurement transaction is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. Unless specified by the Federal agency, the recipient or subrecipient may exercise judgment in determining what number is adequate. The recipient or subrecipient is responsible for determining an appropriate small purchase threshold based on internal controls, an evaluation of risk, and its documented procurement procedures, which may be lower than, but must not exceed, the threshold established in the Federal Acquisition Regulation. Condition The Association is not consistently following their own internal control policy for purchases that meet their small purchase threshold for procurement to obtain price or rate quotations from an adequate number of qualified sources. Cause AVCP is subject to high turnover in its purchasing department. Due to the frequency of new personal onboarding, the small purchase policy was missed was certain contracts. Effect or possible effect The Association not adhering to its established procedures, can lead to noncompliance, questioned costs, repayment obligations, or loss of funding. Questioned Costs None Identified. Context 2 out of 5 vendors selected for testing were not procured for in accordance with AVCP’s policy. Identification as a Repeat Finding None. Recommendation We recommend AVCP implement additional internal controls to ensure AVCP’s internal procurement policies are being followed. Views of Responsible Official and Planned Corrective Action Management concurs with the finding. Thorough training in AVCP’s procurement policies and procedures will be provided to departmental staff. AVCP will also hold an overall training of AVCP’s key and senior personnel by an outside expert in government procurement rules and regulations.

Finding 2025-002: Competitive Proposal Process for Dental Van Procurement (Significant Deficiency) Federal Program: FIP [93.526] Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Criteria: Federal regulations under the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (2 CFR Part 200), specifically 2 CFR § 200.319(b) and § 200.320(b), require that all procurement transactions be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition. For a competitive proposal process, the organization must publicly advertise the procurement and include a clear and accurate description of the technical requirements and specifications for the goods or services to be procured. Furthermore, 2 CFR § 200.320(b)(2)(i) requires that proposals be evaluated and a selection made based on established evaluation criteria. These criteria must be clearly stated in the solicitation and must be used as the basis for the selection, ensuring that price is a factor but not the only one. Condition: The organization intended to use a competitive proposal process to procure a van. However, it failed to publicly advertise the request for proposals, limiting the pool of potential vendors to only those known to the organization. Additionally, the request for proposals did not include a complete and accurate list of specifications, nor did it include the evaluation and selection criteria that would be used to assess the proposals. While the organization did obtain three proposals and documented its rationale for selecting a vendor that was not the lowest bidder, the overall process did not meet the standards for full and open competition required by federal regulations. Questioned Costs: None Cause: The organization lacked a clear understanding of the specific requirements for a federal competitive proposal process. There were no written procedures or internal controls in place to ensure all required documentation and steps were followed. This oversight, combined with an over-reliance on informal practices, contributed to the noncompliance. Effect: The non-compliant procurement process increases the risk that the organization paid more than was necessary for the vehicle, which is an inefficient use of federal funds. Context: This procurement was for a significant asset for the program. While the organization has made an attempt to solicit proposals, the process was fundamentally flawed from the outset due to the lack of public advertising, incomplete specifications, and missing evaluation criteria. This is the first time the organization has procured a van with these funds, and the error was an oversight rather than an intentional act of noncompliance. Repeat Finding: No. This is the first time this specific finding has been identified. Recommendation: The organization should immediately develop and implement a comprehensive procurement policy and procedures manual that fully aligns with 2 CFR Part 200. This manual should provide a detailed checklist for all procurement methods, including specific requirements for public advertising, developing clear specifications, and documenting the full evaluation process based on a set of pre-established criteria. Mandatory training on federal procurement regulations should be provided to all staff involved in federal awards management and procurement to ensure they understand the importance of compliance. Management Response: The organization acknowledges the finding. To address this, we are committing to develop and implement a comprehensive procurement policy and procedures manual that strictly aligns with requirements within the Uniform Guidance. This manual will include detailed checklists for all procurement methods, covering public advertising, clear specification development, and the use of pre-established, documented evaluation criteria, followed by mandatory training for all staff involved in procurement.

FINDING 2024-001 Subject: Water and Waste Disposal Systems for Rural Communities - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Program: Water and Waste Disposal Systems for Rural Communities Assistance Listings Number: 10.760 Federal Award Number or Year (or Other Identifying Number): Interim Financing Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context The City did not have an effective system of internal controls over federal award requirements, including procurement and suspension and debarment. The City failed to properly design and implement internal controls, such as appropriate segregation of duties, to ensure compliance and detect or correct noncompliance in a timely manner. Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000 unless a lower, more restrictive threshold is set by a non-federal entity. As Indiana Code has set a more restrictive threshold of $150,000, informal procurement methods are permitted when the value of the procurement does not exceed $150,000. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds: micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. Procurement - Small Purchases During the audit period, the City had six vendors with purchases under the $150,000 threshold that were considered simplified acquisition procurements and over the $10,000 threshold that was considered micro-purchase procurements. All six vendors were selected for testing, and for five of those vendors, the City could not provide the procurement history or the rationale for the method of procurement, the selection of vendor, or the basis for price. The total dollar amount spent with these five vendors during 2024 was $246,055. Procurement - Simplified Acquisitions During the audit period, the City had three vendors with purchases over the $150,000 threshold that were considered simplified acquisition procurements. All three vendors were selected for testing, and for two of those vendors, the City could not provide the procurement history or the rationale for the method of procurement, the selection of vendor, or the basis for price. The total dollar amount spent with these two vendors during 2024 was $2,654,999. Procurement - Policy Per Uniform Guidance, 2 CFR 200.318(a), a non-federal entity that receives federal funds must have and use documented procurement procedures that conform to applicable federal, state, and local laws and regulations. Additionally, state law, such as Indiana Code 5-22, prescribes specific procedures for purchasing supplies and services based on various dollar thresholds. The City did not provide a purchasing policy for review that included the applicable federal regulation, such as procedures to avoid the acquisition of unnecessary or duplicative items and procedures to ensure that all solicitations incorporate a clear and accurate description of the technical requirements for the material, product, or services to be procured. Additionally, the City did not maintain written standards of conduct covering conflicts of interest and governing actions of its employees engaged in the selection, award, and administration of contracts. Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions, recipients are required to verify that such contracts and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the Excluded Parties List System (ELPS), collecting a certification from that person, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. The City failed to verify that vendors were not suspended or debarred prior to entering into covered transactions exceeding $25,000. Of the eight vendors tested, no documentation was provided to show that a check was performed against the EPLS or through other acceptable verification methods. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance was determined to be a systemic issue throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318 states in part: "(a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. . . . (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. . . ." 2 CFR 200.320(b) states in part: "Formal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal financial assistance awards exceeds the SAT, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require following documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a non-competitive procurement can be used in accordance with § 200.319 or paragraph (c) of this section. The following formal methods of procurement are used for procurement of property or services above the simplified acquisition threshold or a value below the simplified acquisition threshold the non-Federal entity determines to be appropriate: (1) Sealed bids. A procurement method in which bids are publicly solicited and a firm fixed-price contract (lump sum or unit price) is awarded to the responsible bidder whose bid, conforming with all the material terms and conditions of the invitation for bids, is the lowest in price. . . . (2) Proposals. A procurement method in which either a fixed price or cost-reimbursement type contract is awarded. Proposals are generally used when conditions are not appropriate for the use of sealed bids. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the SAM.gov Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause The City's management was not aware of federal compliance requirements related to procurement and suspension and debarment. The City had not established or implemented the necessary internal controls and written policies to ensure purchases and contracts were administered in accordance with federal and state regulations. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the City cannot ensure that the services obtained provided full and open competition or the basis of the price. In addition, the City cannot ensure the vendors paid were eligible to participate in federal programs. Any program funds the City used to pay vendors that have been suspended or debarred would be unallowable, and the funding agency could potentially recover them. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statues, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the City. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the City's management establish a proper system of internal controls to ensure expenditures made from federal awards use the appropriate procurement method and retain the documentation to support the procurement methods used in order to ensure compliance with the terms and conditions of the federal award. We recommended that management of the City establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure contractors and subrecipients, as appropriate, are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded prior to entering into contracts or subawards. We also recommended strengthening its policies and procedures to ensure appropriate supporting documentation for federal programs is retained to be presented for audit. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.

2 CFR 1000.10 gives regulatory effect to the U.S. Department of Treasury for 2 CFR § 200.318 through 200.327 which describe specific procedures non-Federal entities must follow when entering into procurement transactions using Federal funds. 2 CFR § 200.320(b) provides formal procurement methods are required when the value of the procurement transaction under a Federal award exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold of the recipient or subrecipient. Formal procurement methods are competitive and require public notice. 2 CFR § 200.320(b) outlines two formal methods of procurement that are used for procurement transactions above the simplified acquisition threshold, which are (1) sealed bids and (2) competitive proposals. Further, 2 CFR § 200.318(i) indicates the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement transaction. These records must include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Due to inadequate controls over the procurement process, for one out of three (33%) vendors examined during testing of the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, the Village did not obtain sealed bids or competitive proposals before contracting with Arcadis G & M of Ohio to provide engineering services. Expenditures for these services funded with Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds during 2024 totaled $403,969. Failure to obtain proposals from a variety of vendors may result in the Village not utilizing the most qualified vendor as well as further noncompliance with federal requirements. The Village should adopt procedures to help ensure records are maintained to document the history of the procurement, including the rationale for the purchase method, selection of vendors, cost/price analysis (if applicable) and the reason for limiting competition (if applicable).

2024-005 Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Federal Assistance Listing Numbers – 21.027 Federal Agency – Department of Treasury Federal Program Title – COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Award Period – 03/31/2021 through 12/31/2024, 10/01/2020 through 12/31/2023 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Compliance, Other Matter Compliance Requirement: Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Condition: The County did not follow its procurement policy. Additionally, the procurement policy in place does not meet UG requirements, which includes having a policy on suspension and debarment verification. Criteria: 2 CFR 200 requires that all procurement transactions for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award must be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition consistent with the standards of this section and §200.320. The nonfederal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Further, the method of procurement, whether informal or formal, must follow the County’s written procurement policy on approval thresholds and controls. 2 CFR 200 states that nonfederal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220). All nonprocurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. When a nonfederal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the nonfederal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. Questioned Costs: Unknown Context: During testing, it was noted that the County does have a purchasing policy but not a procurement policy that follows Uniform Guidance (UG) nor does the County have a policy that covers suspension and debarment. Furthermore, the County did not retain supporting documentation for the procurement method selected. All six of the transactions tested did not follow the required procedures in place. Cause: The County has a purchasing policy but not a procurement policy that follows Uniform Guidance (UG) nor does the County have a policy that covers suspension and debarment. Effect: The County is not in compliance with procurement or suspension and debarment requirements. Contracts for construction, nonconstruction related procurements, and those over the simplified acquisition threshold may not be in compliance with the Uniform Guidance. Vendors may be paid with federal funds that are suspended and debarred entities which would not be in compliance with the Uniform Guidance. Repeat Finding: This is a repeat finding of 2023-004. Recommendation: We recommend the County review and update procurement policies for the entire County to ensure it meets the minimum requirements of 2 CFR 200 for all federal grants and establish a procurement process in order to ensure this policy is followed which includes adding language over suspension and debarment. Views of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the finding. The County is working on reviewing policies and procedures and updating as necessary. Further, training will be available to all those involved in grants.

Internal Controls over Compliance and Compliance with Procurement Standards Information on the Federal Program: Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Assistance Listing Number: 21.029 Assistance Listing Name: COVID-19 - Coronavirus Capital Projects Fund Pass-through Award: Pass-through Entity Award Number Award Period District of Columbia CPFFN0167 November 21, 2023 through December 31, 2026 Criteria: 2 CFR Section §200.318(i) states, “The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price.” Per 2 CFR Section §200.319, “All procurement transactions for the acquisition of property or services under a Federal award must be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition consistent with the standards of this section and §200.320.” 2 CFR Section §200.324 stipulates that a non-Federal entity must perform a cost or price analysis for each procurement in excess of a minimum threshold. Additionally, 2 CFR Section §200.320(c) states in part, “There are specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. Noncompetitive procurement can only be awarded if one or more of [the defined] circumstances apply”. Condition: We noted there was insufficient documentation retained to support adherence to the required procurement policy and standards. Documentation was unable to be provided to support that cost or price analyses were performed and were conducted providing full and open competition. Additionally, for one procurement deemed noncompetitive by WWHS, none of the circumstances allowing noncompetitive procurement were met. Cause: WWHS’ internal controls over procurement did not fully operate as designed for the year ended December 31, 2024. WWHS did not maintain all required aspects of formal documentation as required by the applicable 2 CFR standards, was unable to provide evidence of full and open competition, and in one instance improperly elected noncompetitive procurement. Effect: We were unable to determine whether the value of procurements for goods or services that exceeded the micro-purchase threshold followed a proper formal procurement method in accordance with 2 CFR Sections §200.319, 320, and 324. Failure to perform procurement procedures in accordance with WWHS’ documented policies and General Procurement Standards as outlined in the 2 CFR Part 200 could result in the procurement being disallowed. Questioned costs: Not determinable Context: We selected a sample of 6 procurements by non-statistical methods, out of a population of 11 procurements. All procurements are related to eligible pre-award costs. WWHS was unable to provide sufficient formal procurement documentation to support full and open competition and performance of cost or price analysis for 4 out of 6 selected procurements. One of those samples was deemed noncompetitive by WWHS but did not meet the circumstances allowing noncompetitive procurement. The prevalence of these findings is detailed in the condition section above. Repeat finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend management refine their procurement tracking method by clarifying established policies and procedures to create more consistency throughout all WWHS purchase transactions. We also recommend management ensure all required procurement documentation is maintained in conjunction with its document retention policy and that a standardized checklist is used for all purchase transactions. Finally, we recommend management train personnel involved in procurement transactions, including reviewer and approver, to adhere to the documented procurement procedures. View of Responsible Officials: The procurement referenced in this finding was completed in 2021 and was connected to the buildout of a new facility that was opened in 2023. The federal award used to ultimately fund the project was obtained in 2024, and thus the expenditures retroactively applied to the award. Management concurs with this finding and will ensure proper adherence to the procurement policy.

Failure to Conduct Competitive Procurement Procedures Criteria Per 2 CFR §§ 200.318–200.327, non-federal entities must conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition. Sole source procurement may only be used when one of the circumstances outlined in 2 CFR § 200.320(c) applies and is adequately documented in the procurement file. Condition The Organization procured services from contractors identified in the approved grant budget prior to award. However, no evidence was provided to demonstrate that a competitive procurement process was conducted in accordance with the Uniform Guidance. There was no documentation of a sole source justification or other exception permitting noncompetitive procurement. Cause The Organization did not conduct competitive procurement or maintain a documented sole source justification for 4 out of 7 contracts reviewed. Listing the contractor in the grant budget prior to award does not satisfy federal procurement requirements outlined in the Uniform Guidance. Effect Failure to conduct competitive procurement increases the risk of noncompliance with the Uniform Guidance and the possibility that funds are not used appropriately, potentially resulting in questioned costs. Questioned Costs No questioned costs were identified as a result of our procedures. Context/Sampling Seven procurement transactions were tested under the program. In four instances, the Organization did not follow federal procurement requirements. No evidence of competitive bidding or documented sole source justification was provided for these transactions. Recommendation We recommend that the Organization implement procedures to ensure compliance with the procurement standards in 2 CFR §§ 200.318–200.327 for all federally funded purchases, including those where a contractor is named in the grant budget. For future procurements, the Organization should either conduct a competitive bidding process or document and obtain approval for a sole source procurement as allowed under 2 CFR § 200.320(c). Management’s Corrective Action Planned Management accepts the recommendation and will ensure compliance with the procurement standards in 2 CFR §§ 200.318–200.327 for all federally funded purchases by either conducting a competitive bidding process or documenting and obtaining approval for a sole source procurement as allowed under 2CFR §200.320(c).

2 CFR § 200.302(b)(7) requires written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with Subpart E-Cost Principles of this part and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. 2 CFR 200.320(b)(2) requires non-federal entities to have a written method for conducting technical evaluations of the competitive proposals receive and for selecting contract recipients. 2 CFR 200.319(d) requires non-federal entities to have written procedures for procurement transactions to ensure all solicitations incorporate a clear and accurate description of the technical requirements for the material, product, or service to be procured and identify all requirements which the offerors must fulfill and all other factors to be used in evaluating bids or proposals. The Village was awarded grant monies under the Uniform Guidance (UG); however, the Village did not establish formal written policies required by the UG for the sections listed above. To help ensure compliance with the Uniform Guidance requirements, the Village should establish and maintain timely updated policies and, more importantly, implement procedure as specified by UG requirements for all grant monies received. Any changes to the Village's policies should also be formally approved by Council and documented within the minutes.

2024-002 – Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment Program: ALN# 47.070 = Computer and Information Science and Engineering Federal Agency: National Science Foundation Federal Award Identification Number(s): 2216614, 2122756 Period: Year Ended December 31, 2024 Criteria: Under 2 CFR 200.319, and 2 CFR 200.320, non-federal entities must maintain written procurement policies and internal controls to ensure compliance with Federal requirements, including suspension and debarment checks. Under 2 CFR 200.214, non-federal entities must not enter into contracts with parties that are suspended or debarred. Condition: During our review of procurement policies, we noted that the Organization did not have written procedures addressing procurement suspension and debarment requirements and the Organization was unable to furnish documentation that procurement, suspension, and debarment procedures took place for all contracts selected for testing. Cause: The Organization has not developed formal written procurement, suspension, and debarment policies and procedures. Effect: Without written polices and procedures, the Organization is at increased risk of: • Failing to verify vendor eligibility. • Contracting with suspended or debarred entities. • Procurements conducted in a manner that fails to provide full and open competition. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs identified. Context: This sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding: Yes Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization: • Develop and implement written procurement policies that clearly outline procedures for suspension and debarment verification. • Require and document evidence of compliance for all covered procurement transactions • Train staff on the updated procedures. • Periodically review procurement files to ensure consistent adherence. Views of Responsible Officials: See management corrective action plan attached.

Finding: Finding Type: Material Weakness Title and Federal Assistance Listing Number of Federal Program: 21.027 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.320, non-federal entities must conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition. For purchases exceeding the micro-purchase threshold of $10,000, the entity must obtain price or rate quotations from an adequate number of qualified sources, unless the purchase qualifies as a sole-source procurement under 2 CFR 200.320(c). Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires the non-federal entity to establish and maintain effective internal control over compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. Furthermore, 2 CFR 200.318(b) and 200.324 require that written contracts be executed with contractors, including all required Federal provisions to safeguard Federal funds. Condition: We examined 60 transactions during our testing of procurement transactions under the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds. We noted that a competitive bidding process was not used in 42 of 60 transactions tested. In all 42 instances, Historic South did not provide evidence that multiple bids or quotes were solicited. The documentation and explanation provided by Historic South was not deemed to be adequate justification to qualify for the use of sole-source procurement under 2 CFR 200.320(c). Additionally, all 60 procurement transactions tested did not have a fully executed, signed contract with the respective contractors. The award/contracting process and methods used to render and pay services did not meet the expected level of formal contractual agreements in place. Cause: In early 2024, Historic South made revisions to the procurement process in order to maximize efficiency and improve overall project outcomes. These revisions were made based on the challenges of securing bids on all potential projects, the need to expend the awarded dollars in a timely fashion and a verbal agreed-upon understanding with the Ohio Department of Health. The requirement to obtain multiple bids was replaced with a strategic invitation approach based on a preferred vendor pool. The result was that Historic South did not have a procedure in place to ensure that procurement transactions were conducted in compliance with Uniform Guidance. Specifically, the procurement policy lacked provisions to enforce competitive procurement practices for purchases above the micro-purchase threshold. Additionally, the process Historic South used to make awards to contractors did not meet the expected standards required for formal contract execution prior to project initiation or payment. - 29 - Historic South Initiative Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs - continued Year Ended December 31, 2024 Section III – Federal Program Audit Findings and Questioned Costs - continued Effect: Failure to obtain competitive bids or quotes increases the risk of paying higher prices for goods/services, or unfair contracting practices. Additionally, the lack of competitive procurement represents noncompliance with Uniform Guidance, which may lead to questioned costs and potential disallowance by the granting agency. Furthermore, the lack of formally signed contracts increases the risk of misuse of federal funds and an inability to enforce contractual obligations or resolve disputes. While our testing did not identify any instances of misspent or improperly used federal funds, the control deficiencies represent a material weakness in internal control over compliance. Questioned Costs: $1,555,114 These costs are considered questioned due to lack of compliance with Uniform Guidance. The amount represents the total bid/contract amount of the 42 transactions tested, that did not meet the competitive bidding requirements. Recommendation: We recommend that Historic South implement and enforce formal procurement procedures that comply with the requirements of 2 CFR 200.317-200.327. These procedures should include obtaining competitive bids and/or maintaining documentation for any alternative bidding process used and approval requirements. Additionally, Historic South should require that fully executed, signed contracts be obtained prior to the start of work or payment to contractors. Staff responsible for procurement should be trained on federal procurement standards to ensure compliance. Views of Responsible Official and Planned Corrective Action: Prospectively, Historic South will review best practices related to the contract awarding process and formal contracting arrangements for construction work. In addition, Historic South will implement policies of: 1. Requiring the solicitation of multiple bids for all construction work in excess of $10,000 2. Establishing criteria for awarding all construction work 3. Implementing formal contracting processes for all construction work

Finding 2024-001 – Noncompliance with Procurement Standards – Professional Services Federal Program: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (Covid-19), ALN #21.027 Criteria: Uniform Guidance requires non-federal entities to maintain documented procurement procedures that ensure full and open competition (2 CFR §200.318). For procurements within the small purchase threshold, nonfederal entities are required to obtain price or rate quotations from an adequate number of qualified sources (2 CFR §200.320). Professional service contracts are subject to these requirements. Condition: The auditee did not follow established procurement policies and the procurement standards set forth in 2 CFR §200.317–§200.327 when engaging legal counsel. Specifically, the auditee procured legal services with total costs between $10,000 and $250,000 without obtaining and documenting required price or rate quotations or performing a documented evaluation of qualified firms. Cause: The auditee did not document a noncompetitive procurement justification or otherwise comply with the small purchase procurement requirements because it was not aware that professional legal services were subject to standards under Uniform Guidance. Additionally, at the time the legal services were engaged, management did not anticipate that the related expenditures would be subject to a Single Audit. Effect: Failure to follow required procurement procedures increases the risk of noncompliance with federal regulations and may result in questioned costs if the expenditures are determined to be unallowable. Context: The audit finding represents an isolated instance. The amount of the audit finding was $22,672 out of the total of $4,605,256 for the program and was discovered using a valid judgmentally selected sample size. Recommendation: We recommend the auditee strengthen internal controls over procurement by ensuring all professional service contracts within the $10,000 to $250,000 threshold comply with federal procurement standards, including obtaining and documenting price or rate quotations from qualified sources and documenting justification for any noncompetitive procurements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Management agrees with the finding and plans to reinforce procurement requirements, and implement review procedures to ensure compliance with procurement thresholds and documentation requirements prior to contract execution.

Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Federal Program Name: Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 10.561 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: 232MN101S2514 – 2024 Passed Through Entity: Minnesota Department of Human Services Pass Through Numbers: H55240010 Compliance Requirement: Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment Award Period: 2024 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Compliance Criteria or specific requirement: The County must follow Uniform Guidance Subsection 200.320 Methods of Procurement for all applicable procurements over the County’s micro-purchase threshold. For purchases over the County's micro-purchase threshold of $10,000 but not exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold of $250,000, the County should follow small purchase procedures. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the County. Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations § 200.303 states that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the auditee is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. Condition: During our testing, it was noted that for one contract out of four tested the County was unable to provide documentation showing that the county followed the open competition requirement. Questioned costs: None Context: One out of the four contracts tested had no documentation of open competition. Cause: The County purchasing likely followed County purchase policies for nonfederal expenditures. Effect: It would be possible that the County could end up spending more federal dollars than necessary for a product or service, if they are not going through the steps to ensure they are utilizing the best vendor for the county and documenting this process each year. Repeat finding: 2023-010 Recommendation: We recommend the County follow their federal purchasing policy in all their federal programs and retain documentation of that process occurring. As necessary, the County may need to add internal controls that are specific to each program to ensure this properly occurs. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the finding.

Program: ALL No. 10.523 Centers of Excellence at 1890 Institutions Significant Deficiency and Noncompliance over Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Repeat Finding: Yes Condition: During our audit we noted that procurement documentation was not available to support the selection of a sole source vendor nor able to obtain documentation to support the Foundation entering into contractual agreements with vendors who were not debarred or suspended from doing business with the federal government. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.514: (c) Internal control. (1) The compliance supplement provides guidance on internal controls over Federal programs based upon the guidance in Standards for Internal Control in the federal Government issued by the Comptroller General of the United States and the Internal Control - Integrated Framework, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). COSO requires entities to establish and maintain effective internal controls to achieve operational, reporting and compliance objectives. Per 2 CFR 200.320 General procurement: (a) Noncompetitive procurement. There are specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. Noncompetitive procurement can only be awarded if one or more of the following circumstances apply: (1) The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold; (2) The item is available only from a single source; (3) The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from publicizing a competitive solicitation; (4) The federal awarding agency or pass-through entity expressly authorizes a noncompetitive procurement in response to a written request from the non-federal entity; or (5) After solicitation of a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate. Per 2 CFR 200.318 General procurement: (b) The non-federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable state, local, and tribal laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal law and the standards identified in this part. Per Uniform Guidance, non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. Cause: Program personnel were unaware of the requirement included in Uniform Guidance related to procedures required for procurement. Effect: If procurement were not in compliance with Uniform Guidance, the Foundation would not identify the noncompliance timely. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend that management develop and implement written procurement policies and procedures in accordance with Uniform Guidance, provide periodic training to program personnel, and establish a review process to ensure procurement activities comply with applicable federal requirements. We also recommend the Foundation follow their process to verify that entities are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded annually at time of award and to document these procedures. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Refer to management’s corrective action plans. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.

Finding 2024-001: Procurement US Department of the Treasury – COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (ALN 21.027) Condition: During our testing of procurement for ALN 21.027, we noted that the City procured certain goods/services through the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania’s COSTARS cooperative purchasing program. For items selected for testing, totaling $184,512, the City did not conduct its own competitive procurement process. In addition, in accordance with the Uniform Guidance, a purchase price from the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania COSTARS cooperative purchasing program is considered to be only one competitive price proposal and it cannot replace a full procurement process. The City does not have implemented monitoring procedures over its use of COSTARS, including [e.g., periodic review of COSTARS procurement documentation, confirmation that COSTARS contracts were competitively awarded, and verification that applicable federal clauses are incorporated]. Documentation in the procurement files was not sufficient to clearly demonstrate how the underlying COSTARS procurement complied with the Uniform Guidance procurement standards for the specific federal award (e.g., basis for contractor selection, method of procurement relative to 2 CFR 200.320 thresholds, and required federal contract provisions). Criteria: In accordance with Uniform Guidance procurement requirements found in 2 CFR Part 200.318 through 200.327, the City is required to ensure that procurement methods used for purchases are appropriate based on the value of the procurement transaction. Cooperative purchasing arrangements (such as state contracts or COSTARS) are not prohibited by the Uniform Guidance; however, the municipality must assume responsibility for the procurement and document how the cooperative contract satisfies the federal procurement requirements applicable to the award. Cause: Procedures in place to ensure that the proper procurement process is followed were not adequate. The City has chosen to leverage the COSTARS cooperative purchasing program to improve efficiency and obtain favorable pricing. While the City has implemented monitoring over COSTARS (for example, reviewing selected COSTARS contract information and maintaining communication with the state regarding procurement practices), those procedures have not been formalized in the written procurement policy, and the related documentation is not consistently retained in the individual grant procurement files. As a result, the audit file did not contain clear, consistent evidence that the COSTARS contracts used for the tested transactions met all applicable Uniform Guidance procurement requirements. Effect: The City was not in compliance with the procurement requirements of the Uniform Guidance. In addition, without documentation demonstrating clear, consistent evidence that COSTARS contracts used for purchases met all applicable Uniform Guidance procurement requirements, there is an increased risk of noncompliance which could result in unallowable costs being charged to the Federal awards. Repeat finding: Yes, finding 2023-002 Questioned costs known and likely: $184,512 known and $124,662 likely. Recommendation: We recommend that the City establish procedures to ensure that their purchasing policy follows all Uniform Guidance procurement standards, especially regarding cooperating purchasing programs. View of Responsible Officials: Management agrees. See Corrective Action Plan.

2 CFR § 300 codified in 45 CFR part 75 gives regulatory effect to the Department of Health and Human Services. 2 CFR § 200.302(b)(6) states the financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for written procedures to implement the requirements of 2 CFR § 200.305 Payment. Additionally, for Federal awards, the Uniform Guidance requires a written policy for the procurement requirements outlined in 2 CFR § 200.318(c)(1), 2 CFR § 200.318(c)(2), and 2 CFR § 200.320(B) 2 CFR 200.302(b)(7) requires written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with Subpart E-Cost Principles of this part and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. 2 CFR 200.430 states that costs of compensation are allowable to the extent that they satisfy the specific requirements of this part, and that the total compensation for individual employees: (1) Is reasonable for the services rendered and conforms to the established written policy of the non-Federal entity consistently applied to both Federal and non-Federal activities; (2) Follows an appointment made in accordance with a non-Federal entity's laws and/or rules or written policies and meets the requirements of Federal statute, where applicable; and (3) Is determined and supported as provided in paragraph (i) of this section, Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses, when applicable. 2 CFR 200.431 requires established written leave policies if the entity intends to pay fringe benefits. 2 CFR 200.464(a)(2) requires reimbursement of relocation costs to employees be in accordance with an established written policy must be consistently followed by the employer. 2 CFR 200.475 requires reimbursement and/or charges to be consistent with those normally allowed in like circumstances in the non-Federal entity's non-federally-funded activities and in accordance with non-Federal entity's written travel reimbursement policies. The General Health District did not have written policies as required by Uniform Guidance. The failure to implement written policies as required by Uniform Guidance could result in noncompliance with the District’s federal programs. The General Health District should adopt written policies in accordance with the Uniform Guidance.

Criteria: Per Federal regulations for general procurement standards (2 CFR § 200.318 (i)), non‑Federal entities must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of the procurement process. These records will include but are not limited to the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Condition: In our procurement testing for CSLFRF funding, the City was unable to provide evidence that demonstrates public notice was published according to (2 CFR § 200.320(b)) for the projects selected. Cause and Effect: Due to the City not conducting procurement for all CSLFRF expenditures through its projects, sufficient evidence was not available to demonstrate that full and open competition was provided to potential bidders, as required. Documentation supporting compliance with procurement requirements, including public notice and solicitation efforts, was not available. Recommendation: We recommend the City implement and enforce procurement policies that require formal solicitation of bids for applicable projects. Initiating a competitive bidding process helps ensure compliance with federal and state procurement standards, promotes transparency, and supports the selection of the most qualified and cost‑effective vendors. Management Response: Management concurs with the finding that procurement documentation for CSLFRF‑funded projects was insufficient to demonstrate compliance with federal procurement standards, including the requirement for public notice under 2 CFR § 200.320(b). The absence of complete records limited the City’s ability to show that full and open competition was provided. To address this issue, the City will revise and strengthen its procurement policies to require formal solicitation and complete documentation for all applicable projects. A centralized system for retaining procurement records will be implemented to ensure that evidence of public notice, solicitation efforts, bid evaluations, and contract award decisions is consistently maintained. Staff involved in procurement will receive training on federal requirements, and a pre‑award compliance checklist will be introduced to verify that all required documentation is in place before contracts are executed. Management will work with all departments involved in procurement to reinforce expectations, implement improved procedures, and ensure that required documentation is consistently retained.

FINDING 2024-001 Information on the federal program: Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Pass-Through Entity: N/A – Direct Grant Federal Program: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF) Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Noncompliance Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)...." 2 CFR 200.318 states in part: "(a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. . . . (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. . . .” 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: “The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases — (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . . “ 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Condition: The City did not have internal controls in place to ensure compliance with the procurement and suspension and debarment requirements. The City had not designed or implemented adequate policies or procedures to ensure that proper procurement procedures for small purchase and simplified acquisition procurement thresholds were followed. Cause: The City had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirements for covered transactions. Effect: Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, procurement procedures for goods and services were not adhered to and vendors to whom payments equal to or in excess of $25,000 were not verified to be not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. The failure to comply with the grant agreement and the compliance requirement could have resulted in the loss of federal funds to the City. Questioned costs: There are no questioned costs. Context: For one out of three samples selected for the small purchase procurement threshold, three quotes and rationale for selecting the vendor were not documented. Small purchase procurements require three competing quotes and rationale for selection of the vendor. The procurement was for park improvement design services. The City was unaware that professional services are required to follow the federal procurement process. Per grant requirements, all grant funded expenditures require appropriate procurement, regardless of whether it is a good or service. For two out of three samples selected for suspension and debarment testing, the City did not have support that vendors procured under CSLFRF funding were not suspended or debarred. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: Yes, finding 2023-003 in the prior year report. Recommendation: We recommend that the City establish and implement control procedures to ensure compliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. This should include ensuring proper procurement methods are followed, suspension and debarment checks are performed and documented prior to entering into the transaction. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management acknowledges the finding. See management’s corrective action plan attached to this audit report.

2024-003 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of the Treasury Federal Program Name: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: 2024; FAIN not available. Award Period: January 1, 2024 through December 31, 2024 Compliance Requirement: Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Type of Finding: Material weakness in internal control over compliance Criteria or Specific Requirement: The United States Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Title 2, Part 200.319 indicates procurement transactions under the Federal award must be conducted in a manner that provides full and open competition. Additionally, 2 CFR Part 200.320 indicates that for any allowable method chosen, the recipient or subrecipient must maintain and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the requirements of 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart D. When a non-federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the nonfederal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR Part 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. This verification may be accomplished by (1) checking the System for Award Management (SAM) Exclusions maintained by the General Services Administration (GSA), (2) collecting a certification from the entity, or (3) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that entity (2 CFR Part 180.300). 2 CFR Part 200.303 indicates that non-Federal entities receiving Federal awards must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition: The Borough did not maintain documentation to support the suspension and debarment procedures performed for covered transactions in order to demonstrate compliance with 2 CFR Part 180 and 2 CFR Part 200. Questioned Costs: None. Context: One (1) of two (2) selections subject to suspension and debarment compliance requirements did not include adequate documentation to demonstrate that the Borough properly verified the vendor was not suspended or debarred prior to entering into the services agreement. Cause: Procedures were not implemented to maintain documentation to support compliance with the standards of suspension and debarment contained in 2 CFR Part 180 and 2 CFR Part 200. Effect: Compliance with the requirements of the federal award could not be demonstrated. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend management enhance procedures and controls to ensure documentation is maintained to support all suspension and debarment verifications related to expenditures from federal award programs. Such documentation should be consolidated and maintained in a secure, accessible location. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding.

Information on Federal Programs: 93.083 – Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Prevention of Disease, Disability, and Death through Immunization & Control of Respiratory & Related Diseases. Criteria or Specific Requirements: 2 CFR §200.303 requires the non-Federal entity to establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the award is managed in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government (Green Book), issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, or the COSO Internal Control Integrated Framework. 2 CFR §200.318-200.320 require the non-Federal entity to have and use documented procurement procedures for the acquisition of property or services under a Federal award that are consistent with the standards for general procurement, competition, and methods of procurement. Condition: ATS’s organization-wide procurement policy does not include documented procurement procedures that address the Uniform Guidance requirements for procurement under Federal awards (for example, methods of procurement, competition requirements, and applicable thresholds) as required by 2 CFR §200.318-200.320. For the federally funded program, ATS implemented a separate written selection policy for contractors/health systems; however, this policy does not fully address all Uniform Guidance procurement elements. Cause: Management had not fully updated its written procurement policies and procedures to incorporate the specific requirements of 2 CFR §200.318-200.320 for procurements under Federal awards. As a result, internal control procedures over procurement under the Federal program were not fully documented in a manner consistent with the Uniform Guidance. Effect: Failure to have and use fully documented procurement policies and procedures compliant with the Uniform Guidance could result in noncompliance with Federal procurement requirements and increase the risk of unallowable or improperly procured costs under Federal awards. In the current year, our testing did not identify specific instances in which procurement transactions under the Federal program were noncompliant; however, the lack of fully compliant written procedures represents a significant deficiency in internal control over compliance. Perspective: ATS did not have documented procurement policies and procedures that were fully compliant with 2 CFR §200.320 for procurement under Federal awards. However, for the Federal program, ATS established a documented selection criteria policy for contractors/health systems. Under this policy, a selection subcommittee reviews, evaluates, and selects health systems based on defined criteria, and each selected application is submitted to the prime awardee for review and approval before ATS issues contracts. In a random sample of 8 procurement contracts tested, all 8 followed the documented selection process and were supported by appropriate documentation. Questioned Costs: None. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Continued Finding 2023-005. Recommendation: ATS should update and formalize its procurement policies and procedures to incorporate the requirements of 2 CFR §200.318-200.320 for all procurements under Federal awards, including: methods of procurement and thresholds, competition requirements, documentation of procurement history, and oversight responsibilities. Once updated, ATS should ensure the procurement under the Federal program is carried out in accordance with these policies and that staff are trained on the revised requirements.

2 CFR § 1000.10 gives regulatory effect to the Department of Treasury for the following sections of 2 CFR 200: 2 CFR § 200.302(b)(7) requires written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with Subpart E-Cost Principles of this part and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. 2 CFR 200.320(b)(2)(ii) requires non-federal entities to have a written method for conducting technical evaluations of the competitive proposals received and for selecting contract recipients. 2 CFR 200.319(d) requires non-federal entities to have written procedures for procurement transactions to ensure all solicitations incorporate a clear and accurate description of the technical requirements for the property, equipment, or service to be procured and identify all requirements which the offerors must fulfill and all other factors to be used in evaluating bids or proposals. The Village was awarded grant monies under the Uniform Guidance (UG); however, the Village did not establish formal written policies required by the UG for the sections listed above. A lack of policies could result in inadequate guidance for individuals to follow and ensure proper compliance. To help ensure compliance with the Uniform Guidance requirements, the Village should establish and maintain timely updated policies and, more importantly, implement procedures as specified by UG requirements for all grant monies received. Any changes to the Village's policies should also be formally approved by Council and documented within the minutes.

2024-001 - Compliance with Reporting Requirements of OMB-Single Audit - Material weakness - Repeated and Modified (Prior Year Finding 2023-001) Federal program information: Funding Agency U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Program Title Indian Housing Block Grant Federal Assistance Listing Number 14.867 Condition: The data collection form for the year ended December 31, 2024, was not submitted to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse by the required deadline of September 30, 2025. Furthermore, the Annual Performance Report for the IHBG Grant was not submitted on a timely basis, and the submission of reports for the IHBG ARP and IHBG CARES grants were not received. Criteria: In accordance with Uniform Guidance (2 CFR § 200.320), the Housing Entity is required to submit the Data Collection Form (SF-SAC) to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse within the earlier of (1) 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor’s report(s), or (2) nine months after the end of the audit period. Further, per 7 CFR § 2500.46, the Housing Entity is required to submit the Annual Performance Report (APR) within 90 days after the end of the reporting period. Although a 30-day extension was granted for the IHBG Grant, the report was still not submitted timely. Additionally, the APRs for the IHBG ARP and IHBG CARES grants were not received, resulting in noncompliance with federal requirements. Cause: The Housing Entity did not submit the Data Collection Form (SF-SAC) and the Annual Performance Reports (APR) for the IHBG Grant within the required timeframes. The delay for the IHBG Grant APR was due to delays in obtaining all necessary information and proper documentation to complete the Single Audit and related reports, while the APRs for the IHBG ARP and IHBG CARES grants were not received. Effect: The Housing Entity was not in compliance with federal regulations for the Annual Performance Reports (APR) and the Data Collection Form (SF-SAC) submissions. Auditor's Recommendation: We recommend that the Housing Entity enhance internal controls to ensure the timely preparation, proper documentation, and submission of the Annual Performance Reports (APR) and the Data Collection Form (SF-SAC). This could include establishing formal timelines, clearly assigning responsibilities, and implementing monitoring procedures to track and meet reporting deadlines.

FINDING 2024-004 Subject: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: U.S. Department of the Treasury Federal Program: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listings Number: 21.027 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): Contract #65873, SLT-3157 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Natural Resources Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2023-004. Condition and Context Procurement The County did adopt an applicable federal purchasing policy. The Lake County Indiana Purchasing Manual for Supplies, Services, and Public Works states on page 19 that "Federal funds less than $25,000 will obtain 3 quotes by telephone or fax and obtain board approval. . . ." The Lake County Indiana Purchasing Manual for Supplies, Services, and Public Works also states on page 19 that "Federal funds more than $25,000 but less than $50,000 will invite 3 quotes at an open public meeting." The federal procurement requirement, per the Code of Federal Regulations section 200.320, states that for small purchases, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. In 2024, the County had two vendors. One was paid $27,963, and one was paid $12,970 for a total of $40,933 from the COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF) under Contract #65873 from the Indiana Department of Natural Resources. However, the County did not obtain price or rate quotes for the applicable vendors under the small purchase threshold as required per its purchasing policy or the federal requirements. Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with the SLFRF award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 and all subawards. The verification is to be done by checking the Excluded Parties List System (EPLS), collecting a certification from that person or entity, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person or entity. The County did not have policies or procedures in place related to the suspension and debarment requirements for the SLFRF funds. Three covered transactions totaling $7,530,563 paid from the SLFRF funds were identified. Documentation to show that suspension and debarment was verified prior to entering into contracts with these three vendors could not be provided by the County. The amounts for which suspension and debarment were not verified for Contract #65873 from the Indiana Department of Natural Resources and the SLT-3157 directly from the U.S. Department of the Treasury were $27,963 and $7,502,600, respectively. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were isolated to the transactions identified above. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(i) states: "The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use document procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases — (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause The County's purchasing policy does not provide procedures on how the County will ensure the appropriate number of quotes will be obtained for small purchases or how the County will ensure compliance with the suspension and debarment requirements. Effect Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the repayment or loss of future federal funding to the County. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation Management of the County should develop procedures to ensure the appropriate procurement methods are used for items or services procured that are within the small purchase threshold and to ensure vendors are not suspended or debarred when expending federal funds. Appropriate documentation should be maintained to ensure compliance with procurement and suspension and debarment. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.

2024-004 COMPLIANCE AND INTERNAL CONTROL OVER PROCUREMENT – ARPA Assistance Listing: 21.027 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Criteria: The American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) provided significant funding to state, local, and tribal governments to address the public health and economic impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic. These funds are subject to the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (2 CFR Part 200), which include the specific standards under Public Bid Law. Condition: For the year ended December 31, 2024, twelve vendors with expenditures totaling $ 2,179,730 were selected for testing. We noted for one of the vendors selected for testing, the City was unable to provide any contract or bid support for the project, which incurred $434,190 of expenditures during the year. Universe/Population: The total population for procurement considerations was all vendors of the American Rescue Plan Act whose transactions for the year ended December 31, 2024, exceeded the micro-purchase threshold of $10,000. Payroll and benefit-related transactions were excluded from the population. Based on these requirements, the population consisted of twenty-three vendors totaling $2,790,345. Sample size : A sample of 12 vendors were selected for testing based on those with total expenditures over $10,000 during the fiscal year. Cause: The City did not adhere to compliance with Uniform Guidance Federal regulations per 2 CFR section 200.320 and its established procurement policy. The City did not maintain appropriate records needed to evidence compliance with Bid Law requirements. Effect: The City may enter into contracts with vendors that do not provide the best possible price when using public funds. Questioned Costs: For the purposes of this finding, there were no questioned costs. Recommendation: The City should strengthen controls to ensure appropriate consideration to competitors is given and adequate documentation is maintained with respect to procurement in accordance with federal Uniform Guidance requirements. Management’s response: The City concurs with the finding described above.

2024-004 COMPLIANCE AND INTERNAL CONTROL OVER PROCUREMENT – ARPA Assistance Listing: 21.027 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Criteria: The American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) provided significant funding to state, local, and tribal governments to address the public health and economic impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic. These funds are subject to the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (2 CFR Part 200), which include the specific standards under Public Bid Law. Condition: For the year ended December 31, 2024, twelve vendors with expenditures totaling $ 2,179,730 were selected for testing. We noted for one of the vendors selected for testing, the City was unable to provide any contract or bid support for the project, which incurred $434,190 of expenditures during the year. Universe/Population: The total population for procurement considerations was all vendors of the American Rescue Plan Act whose transactions for the year ended December 31, 2024, exceeded the micro-purchase threshold of $10,000. Payroll and benefit-related transactions were excluded from the population. Based on these requirements, the population consisted of twenty-three vendors totaling $2,790,345. Sample size : A sample of 12 vendors were selected for testing based on those with total expenditures over $10,000 during the fiscal year. Cause: The City did not adhere to compliance with Uniform Guidance Federal regulations per 2 CFR section 200.320 and its established procurement policy. The City did not maintain appropriate records needed to evidence compliance with Bid Law requirements. Effect: The City may enter into contracts with vendors that do not provide the best possible price when using public funds. Questioned Costs: For the purposes of this finding, there were no questioned costs. Recommendation: The City should strengthen controls to ensure appropriate consideration to competitors is given and adequate documentation is maintained with respect to procurement in accordance with federal Uniform Guidance requirements. Management’s response: The City concurs with the finding described above.

Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR §200.320, federal procurement standards require non- Federal entities to follow documented procedures that promote full and open competition. For small purchases between $10,000 and $250,000, price or rate quotations must be obtained from at least three qualified sources. Purchases exceeding $250,000 must undergo formal procurement procedures such as sealed bidding or competitive proposals. Condition: During our testing of procurement transactions, we identified two vendors with individual purchases exceeding the small purchase threshold of $10,000 for which no documentation of competitive quotes was obtained. Additionally, one vendor exceeded the $250,000 threshold for which a formal competitive procurement process, such as sealed bids or proposals, was not conducted. Cause: While the Organization had a procurement policy aligned with federal requirements, the policy was not effectively enforced throughout the year. Possible effect: The Organization risked overpaying for goods or services and may not have achieved the best value for federal expenditures. Questioned cost: $325,883 – Represents the total expenditures with the three identified vendors during fiscal year 2024. Recommendation: We recommend the Organization enhance its internal controls over procurement by implementing a pre-procurement review process and staff training to ensure consistent compliance with federal procurement thresholds and documentation requirements. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding and will implement procedures to ensure procurement compliance.

Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR §200.320, federal procurement standards require non- Federal entities to follow documented procedures that promote full and open competition. For small purchases between $10,000 and $250,000, price or rate quotations must be obtained from at least three qualified sources. Purchases exceeding $250,000 must undergo formal procurement procedures such as sealed bidding or competitive proposals. Condition: During our testing of procurement transactions, we identified two vendors with individual purchases exceeding the small purchase threshold of $10,000 for which no documentation of competitive quotes was obtained. Additionally, one vendor exceeded the $250,000 threshold for which a formal competitive procurement process, such as sealed bids or proposals, was not conducted. Cause: While the Organization had a procurement policy aligned with federal requirements, the policy was not effectively enforced throughout the year. Possible effect: The Organization risked overpaying for goods or services and may not have achieved the best value for federal expenditures. Questioned cost: $325,883 – Represents the total expenditures with the three identified vendors during fiscal year 2024. Recommendation: We recommend the Organization enhance its internal controls over procurement by implementing a pre-procurement review process and staff training to ensure consistent compliance with federal procurement thresholds and documentation requirements. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding and will implement procedures to ensure procurement compliance.

Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR §200.320, federal procurement standards require non- Federal entities to follow documented procedures that promote full and open competition. For small purchases between $10,000 and $250,000, price or rate quotations must be obtained from at least three qualified sources. Purchases exceeding $250,000 must undergo formal procurement procedures such as sealed bidding or competitive proposals. Condition: During our testing of procurement transactions, we identified two vendors with individual purchases exceeding the small purchase threshold of $10,000 for which no documentation of competitive quotes was obtained. Additionally, one vendor exceeded the $250,000 threshold for which a formal competitive procurement process, such as sealed bids or proposals, was not conducted. Cause: While the Organization had a procurement policy aligned with federal requirements, the policy was not effectively enforced throughout the year. Possible effect: The Organization risked overpaying for goods or services and may not have achieved the best value for federal expenditures. Questioned cost: $325,883 – Represents the total expenditures with the three identified vendors during fiscal year 2024. Recommendation: We recommend the Organization enhance its internal controls over procurement by implementing a pre-procurement review process and staff training to ensure consistent compliance with federal procurement thresholds and documentation requirements. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding and will implement procedures to ensure procurement compliance.

Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR §200.320, federal procurement standards require non- Federal entities to follow documented procedures that promote full and open competition. For small purchases between $10,000 and $250,000, price or rate quotations must be obtained from at least three qualified sources. Purchases exceeding $250,000 must undergo formal procurement procedures such as sealed bidding or competitive proposals. Condition: During our testing of procurement transactions, we identified two vendors with individual purchases exceeding the small purchase threshold of $10,000 for which no documentation of competitive quotes was obtained. Additionally, one vendor exceeded the $250,000 threshold for which a formal competitive procurement process, such as sealed bids or proposals, was not conducted. Cause: While the Organization had a procurement policy aligned with federal requirements, the policy was not effectively enforced throughout the year. Possible effect: The Organization risked overpaying for goods or services and may not have achieved the best value for federal expenditures. Questioned cost: $325,883 – Represents the total expenditures with the three identified vendors during fiscal year 2024. Recommendation: We recommend the Organization enhance its internal controls over procurement by implementing a pre-procurement review process and staff training to ensure consistent compliance with federal procurement thresholds and documentation requirements. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding and will implement procedures to ensure procurement compliance.

Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR §200.320, federal procurement standards require non- Federal entities to follow documented procedures that promote full and open competition. For small purchases between $10,000 and $250,000, price or rate quotations must be obtained from at least three qualified sources. Purchases exceeding $250,000 must undergo formal procurement procedures such as sealed bidding or competitive proposals. Condition: During our testing of procurement transactions, we identified two vendors with individual purchases exceeding the small purchase threshold of $10,000 for which no documentation of competitive quotes was obtained. Additionally, one vendor exceeded the $250,000 threshold for which a formal competitive procurement process, such as sealed bids or proposals, was not conducted. Cause: While the Organization had a procurement policy aligned with federal requirements, the policy was not effectively enforced throughout the year. Possible effect: The Organization risked overpaying for goods or services and may not have achieved the best value for federal expenditures. Questioned cost: $325,883 – Represents the total expenditures with the three identified vendors during fiscal year 2024. Recommendation: We recommend the Organization enhance its internal controls over procurement by implementing a pre-procurement review process and staff training to ensure consistent compliance with federal procurement thresholds and documentation requirements. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding and will implement procedures to ensure procurement compliance.

Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR §200.320, federal procurement standards require non- Federal entities to follow documented procedures that promote full and open competition. For small purchases between $10,000 and $250,000, price or rate quotations must be obtained from at least three qualified sources. Purchases exceeding $250,000 must undergo formal procurement procedures such as sealed bidding or competitive proposals. Condition: During our testing of procurement transactions, we identified two vendors with individual purchases exceeding the small purchase threshold of $10,000 for which no documentation of competitive quotes was obtained. Additionally, one vendor exceeded the $250,000 threshold for which a formal competitive procurement process, such as sealed bids or proposals, was not conducted. Cause: While the Organization had a procurement policy aligned with federal requirements, the policy was not effectively enforced throughout the year. Possible effect: The Organization risked overpaying for goods or services and may not have achieved the best value for federal expenditures. Questioned cost: $325,883 – Represents the total expenditures with the three identified vendors during fiscal year 2024. Recommendation: We recommend the Organization enhance its internal controls over procurement by implementing a pre-procurement review process and staff training to ensure consistent compliance with federal procurement thresholds and documentation requirements. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding and will implement procedures to ensure procurement compliance.

Finding 2024-003 Procurement, Suspension and Debarment (Significant Deficiency) Information on the Federal Programs: Assistance Listing #15.657 Criteria or Specific Requirement: § 200.318 (i) General procurement standards, states that the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Furthermore: §200.320 (f) Methods of procurement to be followed, states that procurement by noncompetitive proposals is procurement through solicitation of a proposal from only one source and may be used only when certain requirements have been met. Additionally, §200.213 Reporting a determination that a non-Federal entity is not qualified for a Federal award states that non-Federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. These regulations restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. The non- Federal entity must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified, by (a) checking SAM Exclusions; (b) collecting a certification from that person; (c) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person.Condition: During our audit, we noted contractual relationships under the Federal awards for which evidence of procurement procedures and documentation of SAM Exclusion checks were unavailable for our inspection. It is our understanding that some contracts were procured under noncompetitive (sole source) justification. However, in certain instances we were unable to review documentation detailing the history and rationale of the procurements. Cause: The Organization's processes in place during 2024 did not provide for the formalization and retention of procurement records and vendor screenings consistent with the expectations outlined in 2 CFR 200. Additionally, the Organization does not have a formal policy in place related to contractor screenings under CFR §200.213. Effect or Potential Effect: Purchases of goods and services could be made above the prevailing market rates if the prescribed procurement procedures are not adhered to. Additionally, the Organization may have inadvertently selected noncompetitive proposals method when the circumstances did not meet the requirements noted in § 200.320 (f) Methods of procurement to be followed, and thereby failing to administer full and open competition as required by the regulations. Finally, the Organization could inadvertently enter into a contractual relationship with an entity that is suspended, debarred or otherwise included on the US Federal sanction list. Questioned Costs: N/A Context: The Organization failed to adhere to its procurement policy, and hence, noncompliance with Federal standards. Our audit work in this area consisted of internal control testwork over a random sample of expenditures. We consider our samples to be representative of the respective populations, and thus, are statistically valid samples. Identification as a Repeat Finding, if Applicable: Yes, continuation of Finding 2023-003 Recommendation: We then recommend that the Organization ensure its policy is distributed and communicated in a formal manner to its employees, and that management properly enforce compliance with its policy. All procurement actions should be clearly documented in writing and maintained in the vendor or contractor files. We also recommend that the Organization enhance its existing policy related to noncompetitive procurement to ensure include the five specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used under CFR 200.320. Additionally, we recommend that the Organization enhance its policies to include screening procedures related to 200.213 Reporting a determination that a non-Federal entity is not qualified for a Federal award.

Finding 2024-003 Procurement, Suspension and Debarment (Significant Deficiency) Information on the Federal Programs: Assistance Listing #15.657 Criteria or Specific Requirement: § 200.318 (i) General procurement standards, states that the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Furthermore: §200.320 (f) Methods of procurement to be followed, states that procurement by noncompetitive proposals is procurement through solicitation of a proposal from only one source and may be used only when certain requirements have been met. Additionally, §200.213 Reporting a determination that a non-Federal entity is not qualified for a Federal award states that non-Federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. These regulations restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. The non- Federal entity must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified, by (a) checking SAM Exclusions; (b) collecting a certification from that person; (c) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person.Condition: During our audit, we noted contractual relationships under the Federal awards for which evidence of procurement procedures and documentation of SAM Exclusion checks were unavailable for our inspection. It is our understanding that some contracts were procured under noncompetitive (sole source) justification. However, in certain instances we were unable to review documentation detailing the history and rationale of the procurements. Cause: The Organization's processes in place during 2024 did not provide for the formalization and retention of procurement records and vendor screenings consistent with the expectations outlined in 2 CFR 200. Additionally, the Organization does not have a formal policy in place related to contractor screenings under CFR §200.213. Effect or Potential Effect: Purchases of goods and services could be made above the prevailing market rates if the prescribed procurement procedures are not adhered to. Additionally, the Organization may have inadvertently selected noncompetitive proposals method when the circumstances did not meet the requirements noted in § 200.320 (f) Methods of procurement to be followed, and thereby failing to administer full and open competition as required by the regulations. Finally, the Organization could inadvertently enter into a contractual relationship with an entity that is suspended, debarred or otherwise included on the US Federal sanction list. Questioned Costs: N/A Context: The Organization failed to adhere to its procurement policy, and hence, noncompliance with Federal standards. Our audit work in this area consisted of internal control testwork over a random sample of expenditures. We consider our samples to be representative of the respective populations, and thus, are statistically valid samples. Identification as a Repeat Finding, if Applicable: Yes, continuation of Finding 2023-003 Recommendation: We then recommend that the Organization ensure its policy is distributed and communicated in a formal manner to its employees, and that management properly enforce compliance with its policy. All procurement actions should be clearly documented in writing and maintained in the vendor or contractor files. We also recommend that the Organization enhance its existing policy related to noncompetitive procurement to ensure include the five specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used under CFR 200.320. Additionally, we recommend that the Organization enhance its policies to include screening procedures related to 200.213 Reporting a determination that a non-Federal entity is not qualified for a Federal award.

Finding 2024-003 Procurement, Suspension and Debarment (Significant Deficiency) Information on the Federal Programs: Assistance Listing #15.657 Criteria or Specific Requirement: § 200.318 (i) General procurement standards, states that the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Furthermore: §200.320 (f) Methods of procurement to be followed, states that procurement by noncompetitive proposals is procurement through solicitation of a proposal from only one source and may be used only when certain requirements have been met. Additionally, §200.213 Reporting a determination that a non-Federal entity is not qualified for a Federal award states that non-Federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. These regulations restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. The non- Federal entity must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified, by (a) checking SAM Exclusions; (b) collecting a certification from that person; (c) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person.Condition: During our audit, we noted contractual relationships under the Federal awards for which evidence of procurement procedures and documentation of SAM Exclusion checks were unavailable for our inspection. It is our understanding that some contracts were procured under noncompetitive (sole source) justification. However, in certain instances we were unable to review documentation detailing the history and rationale of the procurements. Cause: The Organization's processes in place during 2024 did not provide for the formalization and retention of procurement records and vendor screenings consistent with the expectations outlined in 2 CFR 200. Additionally, the Organization does not have a formal policy in place related to contractor screenings under CFR §200.213. Effect or Potential Effect: Purchases of goods and services could be made above the prevailing market rates if the prescribed procurement procedures are not adhered to. Additionally, the Organization may have inadvertently selected noncompetitive proposals method when the circumstances did not meet the requirements noted in § 200.320 (f) Methods of procurement to be followed, and thereby failing to administer full and open competition as required by the regulations. Finally, the Organization could inadvertently enter into a contractual relationship with an entity that is suspended, debarred or otherwise included on the US Federal sanction list. Questioned Costs: N/A Context: The Organization failed to adhere to its procurement policy, and hence, noncompliance with Federal standards. Our audit work in this area consisted of internal control testwork over a random sample of expenditures. We consider our samples to be representative of the respective populations, and thus, are statistically valid samples. Identification as a Repeat Finding, if Applicable: Yes, continuation of Finding 2023-003 Recommendation: We then recommend that the Organization ensure its policy is distributed and communicated in a formal manner to its employees, and that management properly enforce compliance with its policy. All procurement actions should be clearly documented in writing and maintained in the vendor or contractor files. We also recommend that the Organization enhance its existing policy related to noncompetitive procurement to ensure include the five specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used under CFR 200.320. Additionally, we recommend that the Organization enhance its policies to include screening procedures related to 200.213 Reporting a determination that a non-Federal entity is not qualified for a Federal award.

Finding 2024-003 Procurement, Suspension and Debarment (Significant Deficiency) Information on the Federal Programs: Assistance Listing #15.657 Criteria or Specific Requirement: § 200.318 (i) General procurement standards, states that the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Furthermore: §200.320 (f) Methods of procurement to be followed, states that procurement by noncompetitive proposals is procurement through solicitation of a proposal from only one source and may be used only when certain requirements have been met. Additionally, §200.213 Reporting a determination that a non-Federal entity is not qualified for a Federal award states that non-Federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. These regulations restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. The non- Federal entity must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified, by (a) checking SAM Exclusions; (b) collecting a certification from that person; (c) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person.Condition: During our audit, we noted contractual relationships under the Federal awards for which evidence of procurement procedures and documentation of SAM Exclusion checks were unavailable for our inspection. It is our understanding that some contracts were procured under noncompetitive (sole source) justification. However, in certain instances we were unable to review documentation detailing the history and rationale of the procurements. Cause: The Organization's processes in place during 2024 did not provide for the formalization and retention of procurement records and vendor screenings consistent with the expectations outlined in 2 CFR 200. Additionally, the Organization does not have a formal policy in place related to contractor screenings under CFR §200.213. Effect or Potential Effect: Purchases of goods and services could be made above the prevailing market rates if the prescribed procurement procedures are not adhered to. Additionally, the Organization may have inadvertently selected noncompetitive proposals method when the circumstances did not meet the requirements noted in § 200.320 (f) Methods of procurement to be followed, and thereby failing to administer full and open competition as required by the regulations. Finally, the Organization could inadvertently enter into a contractual relationship with an entity that is suspended, debarred or otherwise included on the US Federal sanction list. Questioned Costs: N/A Context: The Organization failed to adhere to its procurement policy, and hence, noncompliance with Federal standards. Our audit work in this area consisted of internal control testwork over a random sample of expenditures. We consider our samples to be representative of the respective populations, and thus, are statistically valid samples. Identification as a Repeat Finding, if Applicable: Yes, continuation of Finding 2023-003 Recommendation: We then recommend that the Organization ensure its policy is distributed and communicated in a formal manner to its employees, and that management properly enforce compliance with its policy. All procurement actions should be clearly documented in writing and maintained in the vendor or contractor files. We also recommend that the Organization enhance its existing policy related to noncompetitive procurement to ensure include the five specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used under CFR 200.320. Additionally, we recommend that the Organization enhance its policies to include screening procedures related to 200.213 Reporting a determination that a non-Federal entity is not qualified for a Federal award.

Finding 2024-003 Procurement, Suspension and Debarment (Significant Deficiency) Information on the Federal Programs: Assistance Listing #15.657 Criteria or Specific Requirement: § 200.318 (i) General procurement standards, states that the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Furthermore: §200.320 (f) Methods of procurement to be followed, states that procurement by noncompetitive proposals is procurement through solicitation of a proposal from only one source and may be used only when certain requirements have been met. Additionally, §200.213 Reporting a determination that a non-Federal entity is not qualified for a Federal award states that non-Federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. These regulations restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. The non- Federal entity must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified, by (a) checking SAM Exclusions; (b) collecting a certification from that person; (c) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person.Condition: During our audit, we noted contractual relationships under the Federal awards for which evidence of procurement procedures and documentation of SAM Exclusion checks were unavailable for our inspection. It is our understanding that some contracts were procured under noncompetitive (sole source) justification. However, in certain instances we were unable to review documentation detailing the history and rationale of the procurements. Cause: The Organization's processes in place during 2024 did not provide for the formalization and retention of procurement records and vendor screenings consistent with the expectations outlined in 2 CFR 200. Additionally, the Organization does not have a formal policy in place related to contractor screenings under CFR §200.213. Effect or Potential Effect: Purchases of goods and services could be made above the prevailing market rates if the prescribed procurement procedures are not adhered to. Additionally, the Organization may have inadvertently selected noncompetitive proposals method when the circumstances did not meet the requirements noted in § 200.320 (f) Methods of procurement to be followed, and thereby failing to administer full and open competition as required by the regulations. Finally, the Organization could inadvertently enter into a contractual relationship with an entity that is suspended, debarred or otherwise included on the US Federal sanction list. Questioned Costs: N/A Context: The Organization failed to adhere to its procurement policy, and hence, noncompliance with Federal standards. Our audit work in this area consisted of internal control testwork over a random sample of expenditures. We consider our samples to be representative of the respective populations, and thus, are statistically valid samples. Identification as a Repeat Finding, if Applicable: Yes, continuation of Finding 2023-003 Recommendation: We then recommend that the Organization ensure its policy is distributed and communicated in a formal manner to its employees, and that management properly enforce compliance with its policy. All procurement actions should be clearly documented in writing and maintained in the vendor or contractor files. We also recommend that the Organization enhance its existing policy related to noncompetitive procurement to ensure include the five specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used under CFR 200.320. Additionally, we recommend that the Organization enhance its policies to include screening procedures related to 200.213 Reporting a determination that a non-Federal entity is not qualified for a Federal award.

Finding 2024-003 Procurement, Suspension and Debarment (Significant Deficiency) Information on the Federal Programs: Assistance Listing #15.657 Criteria or Specific Requirement: § 200.318 (i) General procurement standards, states that the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Furthermore: §200.320 (f) Methods of procurement to be followed, states that procurement by noncompetitive proposals is procurement through solicitation of a proposal from only one source and may be used only when certain requirements have been met. Additionally, §200.213 Reporting a determination that a non-Federal entity is not qualified for a Federal award states that non-Federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. These regulations restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. The non- Federal entity must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified, by (a) checking SAM Exclusions; (b) collecting a certification from that person; (c) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person.Condition: During our audit, we noted contractual relationships under the Federal awards for which evidence of procurement procedures and documentation of SAM Exclusion checks were unavailable for our inspection. It is our understanding that some contracts were procured under noncompetitive (sole source) justification. However, in certain instances we were unable to review documentation detailing the history and rationale of the procurements. Cause: The Organization's processes in place during 2024 did not provide for the formalization and retention of procurement records and vendor screenings consistent with the expectations outlined in 2 CFR 200. Additionally, the Organization does not have a formal policy in place related to contractor screenings under CFR §200.213. Effect or Potential Effect: Purchases of goods and services could be made above the prevailing market rates if the prescribed procurement procedures are not adhered to. Additionally, the Organization may have inadvertently selected noncompetitive proposals method when the circumstances did not meet the requirements noted in § 200.320 (f) Methods of procurement to be followed, and thereby failing to administer full and open competition as required by the regulations. Finally, the Organization could inadvertently enter into a contractual relationship with an entity that is suspended, debarred or otherwise included on the US Federal sanction list. Questioned Costs: N/A Context: The Organization failed to adhere to its procurement policy, and hence, noncompliance with Federal standards. Our audit work in this area consisted of internal control testwork over a random sample of expenditures. We consider our samples to be representative of the respective populations, and thus, are statistically valid samples. Identification as a Repeat Finding, if Applicable: Yes, continuation of Finding 2023-003 Recommendation: We then recommend that the Organization ensure its policy is distributed and communicated in a formal manner to its employees, and that management properly enforce compliance with its policy. All procurement actions should be clearly documented in writing and maintained in the vendor or contractor files. We also recommend that the Organization enhance its existing policy related to noncompetitive procurement to ensure include the five specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used under CFR 200.320. Additionally, we recommend that the Organization enhance its policies to include screening procedures related to 200.213 Reporting a determination that a non-Federal entity is not qualified for a Federal award.

Finding 2024-003 Procurement, Suspension and Debarment (Significant Deficiency) Information on the Federal Programs: Assistance Listing #15.657 Criteria or Specific Requirement: § 200.318 (i) General procurement standards, states that the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Furthermore: §200.320 (f) Methods of procurement to be followed, states that procurement by noncompetitive proposals is procurement through solicitation of a proposal from only one source and may be used only when certain requirements have been met. Additionally, §200.213 Reporting a determination that a non-Federal entity is not qualified for a Federal award states that non-Federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. These regulations restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. The non- Federal entity must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified, by (a) checking SAM Exclusions; (b) collecting a certification from that person; (c) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person.Condition: During our audit, we noted contractual relationships under the Federal awards for which evidence of procurement procedures and documentation of SAM Exclusion checks were unavailable for our inspection. It is our understanding that some contracts were procured under noncompetitive (sole source) justification. However, in certain instances we were unable to review documentation detailing the history and rationale of the procurements. Cause: The Organization's processes in place during 2024 did not provide for the formalization and retention of procurement records and vendor screenings consistent with the expectations outlined in 2 CFR 200. Additionally, the Organization does not have a formal policy in place related to contractor screenings under CFR §200.213. Effect or Potential Effect: Purchases of goods and services could be made above the prevailing market rates if the prescribed procurement procedures are not adhered to. Additionally, the Organization may have inadvertently selected noncompetitive proposals method when the circumstances did not meet the requirements noted in § 200.320 (f) Methods of procurement to be followed, and thereby failing to administer full and open competition as required by the regulations. Finally, the Organization could inadvertently enter into a contractual relationship with an entity that is suspended, debarred or otherwise included on the US Federal sanction list. Questioned Costs: N/A Context: The Organization failed to adhere to its procurement policy, and hence, noncompliance with Federal standards. Our audit work in this area consisted of internal control testwork over a random sample of expenditures. We consider our samples to be representative of the respective populations, and thus, are statistically valid samples. Identification as a Repeat Finding, if Applicable: Yes, continuation of Finding 2023-003 Recommendation: We then recommend that the Organization ensure its policy is distributed and communicated in a formal manner to its employees, and that management properly enforce compliance with its policy. All procurement actions should be clearly documented in writing and maintained in the vendor or contractor files. We also recommend that the Organization enhance its existing policy related to noncompetitive procurement to ensure include the five specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used under CFR 200.320. Additionally, we recommend that the Organization enhance its policies to include screening procedures related to 200.213 Reporting a determination that a non-Federal entity is not qualified for a Federal award.

2024-002 Procurement Space Operations Assistance Listing Number: 43.007 Federal Award ID Number: 80JSC018M0005 National Aeronautics and Space Administration 2024 Funding, Repeat Finding Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 provides that non-Federal entities must establish and maintain effective internal controls to provide reasonable assurance of compliance with Uniform Guidance. 2 CFR Section 200.320 and 48 CFR section 52.244-5 sets forth the requirements for acquisition contracts awarded to vendors including the requirement to obtain price or rate quotations from an adequate number of qualified sources and the circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement methods can be used. Also, CASIS’s procurement policy states that it is in both CASIS and NASA’s interest to compete when it makes sense regardless of the threshold and can be achieved by obtaining three quotes, i.e., comparative shopping. A minimum of 3 vendors are required to demonstrate competition. CASIS may solicit a proposal from only one source in circumstances where one or more of the following conditions apply (FAR Subpart 6.3): (i) The item or service is available only from a single source. supplies or services to be procured immediately. (iii) NASA specifically authorizes the use of noncompetitive proposals (directed source). (iv) After consultation with a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate. (v) The vendor is listed as a sole source provider under the Cooperative Agreement. Condition: Sole source determination was not documented for two vendors. Cause: For two legal expenses tested in the sample, no documentation of this being a sole source purchase prior to expending the funds. Effect: If CASIS cannot demonstrate that procurement of services were properly sole sourced, this may result in questioned costs and funds being returned to NASA. Questioned Costs: Known questioned costs of $41,762 and likely questioned costs of $90,024. Perspective: There were 2 out of 60 expenses selected for which the control failed. Recommendation: Non-competitive procurement should be documented and approved prior to incurring expenses. Management Response: CASIS acknowledges the error documenting these procurements. The two legal service vendors had been discussed internally and the selections rationalized based on the specialty of the professional services required for leasing and employment matters. Unfortunately, the documentation was not completed and stored as required by our internal policies. We consider these costs to be both necessary and reasonable, as we were negotiating a new office space lease and the rates were consistent with other legal service providers that CASIS has procured. CASIS plans on reinforcing the procurement documentation requirements with our personnel through additional training and reminding that engagement letters need to go through our document review software.

Failure to Follow Procurement Policy Finding 2024-002 Condition: The Authority did not comply with the current procurement policy as procedures were not fully followed and forms required by the Authority’s procurement policy were not completed for the heating ventilation and cooling project, new roof, and electric vehicle charging stations. The following forms required by either 2 CFR 200 and/or the Authority’s own procurement policy were not completed for the current year capital asset purchases: Written Record of Procurement Checklist Form, Method of Procurement Decision Matrix, Advertisement and Solicitation Form, Bid Quotations, Fewer Than 3 Offers Received Evaluation if applicable, Proposal Tabulation, Certification of Compliance with Federal Clauses for the assets less than $25,000, and Responsibility Determination (sam.gov debarred verification). Criteria: The following requirements are documented in 2 CFR 200-Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards. 2 CFR 200.214 Suspension and Debarment Non-Federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. 2 CFR Part 200.318 General Procurement Standards (a) The Non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. (i) the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. 2 CFR 200.320 Methods of Procurement to be Followed (b) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. 2 CFR 200.324 Contract Cost and Price (a) The Non-Federal entity must perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold including contract modifications. The method and degree of analysis is dependent on the facts surrounding the particular procurement situation, but as a starting point, the non-Federal entity must make independent estimates before receiving bids or proposals. Concurrently, the Authority’s did not comply with its own current procurement policy as it did not follow or prepare the required documentation detailed in the following sections. Procurement Requests-The Authority will maintain sufficient records to detail the history of a procurement. Such records shall include method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection (or rejection), and the contract price. The Authority will treat any prospective contractor or sub-contractor listed on a centralized State government debarment and suspension list as nonresponsible and ineligible for contract award. Debarment and Suspension- The Authority will treat any prospective contractor or sub-contractor listed on a centralized State government debarment and suspension list as non-responsible and ineligible for contract awards. To see if a prospective contractor is eligible, we will look on the website www.SAM.gov and when the bid has been received. Methods of Procurement- a. Micro and Emergency Purchases (do not exceed $10,000)-(a) A written determination as to why price is deemed fair and reasonable must be on file with each purchase made under this method of procurement using Micro-Purchase Price Reasonableness Determination Form. (b) Splitting of procurements to avoid the competitive procurement requirements of federal and state statues shall not be condoned. b. Small Purchase Procurement ($10,000 to $250,000)-(a) A minimum of two price or rate quotations shall be obtained from qualified sources; (b) The procurement will be made from the lowest priced qualified bid, if products or goods are equal; (c) MDOT requires for procurements under $25,000.00. Included Procurement Appendix A, B, E, F, G, H, or I and Vehicle Specification certification if applies. (d) MDOT requires for procurements over $25,000.00 solicitations, including specifications and written selection procedures (lowest bids), Include Procurement Appendix A, F, G, H or I and Vehicle Specification certification if applies. Third Party Contracts with applicable clauses and bond documents must be included. Cause: The Authority did not follow its own procurement policy. Effect: The Authority is noncompliant with 2 CFR 200 and its own procurement policy. Directive: We direct the Authority review and update its procurement policy and implement procedures to ensure that the Authority is complying with the federal requirements, required forms are being completed, and documentation is being maintained. Management’s Response--Corrective Action Plan: Contact person is Todd Shurn, Executive Director, 275 East Wall Street, P.O. Box 837, Benton Harbor, Michigan 49023. Telephone (269) 927-2268. The Authority acknowledges the finding and is currently working to correct this.

Failure to Follow Procurement Policy Finding 2024-002 Condition: The Authority did not comply with the current procurement policy as procedures were not fully followed and forms required by the Authority’s procurement policy were not completed for the heating ventilation and cooling project, new roof, and electric vehicle charging stations. The following forms required by either 2 CFR 200 and/or the Authority’s own procurement policy were not completed for the current year capital asset purchases: Written Record of Procurement Checklist Form, Method of Procurement Decision Matrix, Advertisement and Solicitation Form, Bid Quotations, Fewer Than 3 Offers Received Evaluation if applicable, Proposal Tabulation, Certification of Compliance with Federal Clauses for the assets less than $25,000, and Responsibility Determination (sam.gov debarred verification). Criteria: The following requirements are documented in 2 CFR 200-Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards. 2 CFR 200.214 Suspension and Debarment Non-Federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. 2 CFR Part 200.318 General Procurement Standards (a) The Non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. (i) the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. 2 CFR 200.320 Methods of Procurement to be Followed (b) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. 2 CFR 200.324 Contract Cost and Price (a) The Non-Federal entity must perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold including contract modifications. The method and degree of analysis is dependent on the facts surrounding the particular procurement situation, but as a starting point, the non-Federal entity must make independent estimates before receiving bids or proposals. Concurrently, the Authority’s did not comply with its own current procurement policy as it did not follow or prepare the required documentation detailed in the following sections. Procurement Requests-The Authority will maintain sufficient records to detail the history of a procurement. Such records shall include method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection (or rejection), and the contract price. The Authority will treat any prospective contractor or sub-contractor listed on a centralized State government debarment and suspension list as nonresponsible and ineligible for contract award. Debarment and Suspension- The Authority will treat any prospective contractor or sub-contractor listed on a centralized State government debarment and suspension list as non-responsible and ineligible for contract awards. To see if a prospective contractor is eligible, we will look on the website www.SAM.gov and when the bid has been received. Methods of Procurement- a. Micro and Emergency Purchases (do not exceed $10,000)-(a) A written determination as to why price is deemed fair and reasonable must be on file with each purchase made under this method of procurement using Micro-Purchase Price Reasonableness Determination Form. (b) Splitting of procurements to avoid the competitive procurement requirements of federal and state statues shall not be condoned. b. Small Purchase Procurement ($10,000 to $250,000)-(a) A minimum of two price or rate quotations shall be obtained from qualified sources; (b) The procurement will be made from the lowest priced qualified bid, if products or goods are equal; (c) MDOT requires for procurements under $25,000.00. Included Procurement Appendix A, B, E, F, G, H, or I and Vehicle Specification certification if applies. (d) MDOT requires for procurements over $25,000.00 solicitations, including specifications and written selection procedures (lowest bids), Include Procurement Appendix A, F, G, H or I and Vehicle Specification certification if applies. Third Party Contracts with applicable clauses and bond documents must be included. Cause: The Authority did not follow its own procurement policy. Effect: The Authority is noncompliant with 2 CFR 200 and its own procurement policy. Directive: We direct the Authority review and update its procurement policy and implement procedures to ensure that the Authority is complying with the federal requirements, required forms are being completed, and documentation is being maintained. Management’s Response--Corrective Action Plan: Contact person is Todd Shurn, Executive Director, 275 East Wall Street, P.O. Box 837, Benton Harbor, Michigan 49023. Telephone (269) 927-2268. The Authority acknowledges the finding and is currently working to correct this.

Failure to Follow Procurement Policy Finding 2024-002 Condition: The Authority did not comply with the current procurement policy as procedures were not fully followed and forms required by the Authority’s procurement policy were not completed for the heating ventilation and cooling project, new roof, and electric vehicle charging stations. The following forms required by either 2 CFR 200 and/or the Authority’s own procurement policy were not completed for the current year capital asset purchases: Written Record of Procurement Checklist Form, Method of Procurement Decision Matrix, Advertisement and Solicitation Form, Bid Quotations, Fewer Than 3 Offers Received Evaluation if applicable, Proposal Tabulation, Certification of Compliance with Federal Clauses for the assets less than $25,000, and Responsibility Determination (sam.gov debarred verification). Criteria: The following requirements are documented in 2 CFR 200-Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards. 2 CFR 200.214 Suspension and Debarment Non-Federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. 2 CFR Part 200.318 General Procurement Standards (a) The Non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. (i) the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. 2 CFR 200.320 Methods of Procurement to be Followed (b) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. 2 CFR 200.324 Contract Cost and Price (a) The Non-Federal entity must perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold including contract modifications. The method and degree of analysis is dependent on the facts surrounding the particular procurement situation, but as a starting point, the non-Federal entity must make independent estimates before receiving bids or proposals. Concurrently, the Authority’s did not comply with its own current procurement policy as it did not follow or prepare the required documentation detailed in the following sections. Procurement Requests-The Authority will maintain sufficient records to detail the history of a procurement. Such records shall include method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection (or rejection), and the contract price. The Authority will treat any prospective contractor or sub-contractor listed on a centralized State government debarment and suspension list as nonresponsible and ineligible for contract award. Debarment and Suspension- The Authority will treat any prospective contractor or sub-contractor listed on a centralized State government debarment and suspension list as non-responsible and ineligible for contract awards. To see if a prospective contractor is eligible, we will look on the website www.SAM.gov and when the bid has been received. Methods of Procurement- a. Micro and Emergency Purchases (do not exceed $10,000)-(a) A written determination as to why price is deemed fair and reasonable must be on file with each purchase made under this method of procurement using Micro-Purchase Price Reasonableness Determination Form. (b) Splitting of procurements to avoid the competitive procurement requirements of federal and state statues shall not be condoned. b. Small Purchase Procurement ($10,000 to $250,000)-(a) A minimum of two price or rate quotations shall be obtained from qualified sources; (b) The procurement will be made from the lowest priced qualified bid, if products or goods are equal; (c) MDOT requires for procurements under $25,000.00. Included Procurement Appendix A, B, E, F, G, H, or I and Vehicle Specification certification if applies. (d) MDOT requires for procurements over $25,000.00 solicitations, including specifications and written selection procedures (lowest bids), Include Procurement Appendix A, F, G, H or I and Vehicle Specification certification if applies. Third Party Contracts with applicable clauses and bond documents must be included. Cause: The Authority did not follow its own procurement policy. Effect: The Authority is noncompliant with 2 CFR 200 and its own procurement policy. Directive: We direct the Authority review and update its procurement policy and implement procedures to ensure that the Authority is complying with the federal requirements, required forms are being completed, and documentation is being maintained. Management’s Response--Corrective Action Plan: Contact person is Todd Shurn, Executive Director, 275 East Wall Street, P.O. Box 837, Benton Harbor, Michigan 49023. Telephone (269) 927-2268. The Authority acknowledges the finding and is currently working to correct this.

Failure to Follow Procurement Policy Finding 2024-002 Condition: The Authority did not comply with the current procurement policy as procedures were not fully followed and forms required by the Authority’s procurement policy were not completed for the heating ventilation and cooling project, new roof, and electric vehicle charging stations. The following forms required by either 2 CFR 200 and/or the Authority’s own procurement policy were not completed for the current year capital asset purchases: Written Record of Procurement Checklist Form, Method of Procurement Decision Matrix, Advertisement and Solicitation Form, Bid Quotations, Fewer Than 3 Offers Received Evaluation if applicable, Proposal Tabulation, Certification of Compliance with Federal Clauses for the assets less than $25,000, and Responsibility Determination (sam.gov debarred verification). Criteria: The following requirements are documented in 2 CFR 200-Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards. 2 CFR 200.214 Suspension and Debarment Non-Federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. 2 CFR Part 200.318 General Procurement Standards (a) The Non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. (i) the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. 2 CFR 200.320 Methods of Procurement to be Followed (b) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. 2 CFR 200.324 Contract Cost and Price (a) The Non-Federal entity must perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold including contract modifications. The method and degree of analysis is dependent on the facts surrounding the particular procurement situation, but as a starting point, the non-Federal entity must make independent estimates before receiving bids or proposals. Concurrently, the Authority’s did not comply with its own current procurement policy as it did not follow or prepare the required documentation detailed in the following sections. Procurement Requests-The Authority will maintain sufficient records to detail the history of a procurement. Such records shall include method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection (or rejection), and the contract price. The Authority will treat any prospective contractor or sub-contractor listed on a centralized State government debarment and suspension list as nonresponsible and ineligible for contract award. Debarment and Suspension- The Authority will treat any prospective contractor or sub-contractor listed on a centralized State government debarment and suspension list as non-responsible and ineligible for contract awards. To see if a prospective contractor is eligible, we will look on the website www.SAM.gov and when the bid has been received. Methods of Procurement- a. Micro and Emergency Purchases (do not exceed $10,000)-(a) A written determination as to why price is deemed fair and reasonable must be on file with each purchase made under this method of procurement using Micro-Purchase Price Reasonableness Determination Form. (b) Splitting of procurements to avoid the competitive procurement requirements of federal and state statues shall not be condoned. b. Small Purchase Procurement ($10,000 to $250,000)-(a) A minimum of two price or rate quotations shall be obtained from qualified sources; (b) The procurement will be made from the lowest priced qualified bid, if products or goods are equal; (c) MDOT requires for procurements under $25,000.00. Included Procurement Appendix A, B, E, F, G, H, or I and Vehicle Specification certification if applies. (d) MDOT requires for procurements over $25,000.00 solicitations, including specifications and written selection procedures (lowest bids), Include Procurement Appendix A, F, G, H or I and Vehicle Specification certification if applies. Third Party Contracts with applicable clauses and bond documents must be included. Cause: The Authority did not follow its own procurement policy. Effect: The Authority is noncompliant with 2 CFR 200 and its own procurement policy. Directive: We direct the Authority review and update its procurement policy and implement procedures to ensure that the Authority is complying with the federal requirements, required forms are being completed, and documentation is being maintained. Management’s Response--Corrective Action Plan: Contact person is Todd Shurn, Executive Director, 275 East Wall Street, P.O. Box 837, Benton Harbor, Michigan 49023. Telephone (269) 927-2268. The Authority acknowledges the finding and is currently working to correct this.

Failure to Follow Procurement Policy Finding 2024-002 Condition: The Authority did not comply with the current procurement policy as procedures were not fully followed and forms required by the Authority’s procurement policy were not completed for the heating ventilation and cooling project, new roof, and electric vehicle charging stations. The following forms required by either 2 CFR 200 and/or the Authority’s own procurement policy were not completed for the current year capital asset purchases: Written Record of Procurement Checklist Form, Method of Procurement Decision Matrix, Advertisement and Solicitation Form, Bid Quotations, Fewer Than 3 Offers Received Evaluation if applicable, Proposal Tabulation, Certification of Compliance with Federal Clauses for the assets less than $25,000, and Responsibility Determination (sam.gov debarred verification). Criteria: The following requirements are documented in 2 CFR 200-Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards. 2 CFR 200.214 Suspension and Debarment Non-Federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. 2 CFR Part 200.318 General Procurement Standards (a) The Non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. (i) the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. 2 CFR 200.320 Methods of Procurement to be Followed (b) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. 2 CFR 200.324 Contract Cost and Price (a) The Non-Federal entity must perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold including contract modifications. The method and degree of analysis is dependent on the facts surrounding the particular procurement situation, but as a starting point, the non-Federal entity must make independent estimates before receiving bids or proposals. Concurrently, the Authority’s did not comply with its own current procurement policy as it did not follow or prepare the required documentation detailed in the following sections. Procurement Requests-The Authority will maintain sufficient records to detail the history of a procurement. Such records shall include method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection (or rejection), and the contract price. The Authority will treat any prospective contractor or sub-contractor listed on a centralized State government debarment and suspension list as nonresponsible and ineligible for contract award. Debarment and Suspension- The Authority will treat any prospective contractor or sub-contractor listed on a centralized State government debarment and suspension list as non-responsible and ineligible for contract awards. To see if a prospective contractor is eligible, we will look on the website www.SAM.gov and when the bid has been received. Methods of Procurement- a. Micro and Emergency Purchases (do not exceed $10,000)-(a) A written determination as to why price is deemed fair and reasonable must be on file with each purchase made under this method of procurement using Micro-Purchase Price Reasonableness Determination Form. (b) Splitting of procurements to avoid the competitive procurement requirements of federal and state statues shall not be condoned. b. Small Purchase Procurement ($10,000 to $250,000)-(a) A minimum of two price or rate quotations shall be obtained from qualified sources; (b) The procurement will be made from the lowest priced qualified bid, if products or goods are equal; (c) MDOT requires for procurements under $25,000.00. Included Procurement Appendix A, B, E, F, G, H, or I and Vehicle Specification certification if applies. (d) MDOT requires for procurements over $25,000.00 solicitations, including specifications and written selection procedures (lowest bids), Include Procurement Appendix A, F, G, H or I and Vehicle Specification certification if applies. Third Party Contracts with applicable clauses and bond documents must be included. Cause: The Authority did not follow its own procurement policy. Effect: The Authority is noncompliant with 2 CFR 200 and its own procurement policy. Directive: We direct the Authority review and update its procurement policy and implement procedures to ensure that the Authority is complying with the federal requirements, required forms are being completed, and documentation is being maintained. Management’s Response--Corrective Action Plan: Contact person is Todd Shurn, Executive Director, 275 East Wall Street, P.O. Box 837, Benton Harbor, Michigan 49023. Telephone (269) 927-2268. The Authority acknowledges the finding and is currently working to correct this.

Failure to Follow Procurement Policy Finding 2024-002 Condition: The Authority did not comply with the current procurement policy as procedures were not fully followed and forms required by the Authority’s procurement policy were not completed for the heating ventilation and cooling project, new roof, and electric vehicle charging stations. The following forms required by either 2 CFR 200 and/or the Authority’s own procurement policy were not completed for the current year capital asset purchases: Written Record of Procurement Checklist Form, Method of Procurement Decision Matrix, Advertisement and Solicitation Form, Bid Quotations, Fewer Than 3 Offers Received Evaluation if applicable, Proposal Tabulation, Certification of Compliance with Federal Clauses for the assets less than $25,000, and Responsibility Determination (sam.gov debarred verification). Criteria: The following requirements are documented in 2 CFR 200-Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards. 2 CFR 200.214 Suspension and Debarment Non-Federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. 2 CFR Part 200.318 General Procurement Standards (a) The Non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. (i) the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. 2 CFR 200.320 Methods of Procurement to be Followed (b) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. 2 CFR 200.324 Contract Cost and Price (a) The Non-Federal entity must perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold including contract modifications. The method and degree of analysis is dependent on the facts surrounding the particular procurement situation, but as a starting point, the non-Federal entity must make independent estimates before receiving bids or proposals. Concurrently, the Authority’s did not comply with its own current procurement policy as it did not follow or prepare the required documentation detailed in the following sections. Procurement Requests-The Authority will maintain sufficient records to detail the history of a procurement. Such records shall include method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection (or rejection), and the contract price. The Authority will treat any prospective contractor or sub-contractor listed on a centralized State government debarment and suspension list as nonresponsible and ineligible for contract award. Debarment and Suspension- The Authority will treat any prospective contractor or sub-contractor listed on a centralized State government debarment and suspension list as non-responsible and ineligible for contract awards. To see if a prospective contractor is eligible, we will look on the website www.SAM.gov and when the bid has been received. Methods of Procurement- a. Micro and Emergency Purchases (do not exceed $10,000)-(a) A written determination as to why price is deemed fair and reasonable must be on file with each purchase made under this method of procurement using Micro-Purchase Price Reasonableness Determination Form. (b) Splitting of procurements to avoid the competitive procurement requirements of federal and state statues shall not be condoned. b. Small Purchase Procurement ($10,000 to $250,000)-(a) A minimum of two price or rate quotations shall be obtained from qualified sources; (b) The procurement will be made from the lowest priced qualified bid, if products or goods are equal; (c) MDOT requires for procurements under $25,000.00. Included Procurement Appendix A, B, E, F, G, H, or I and Vehicle Specification certification if applies. (d) MDOT requires for procurements over $25,000.00 solicitations, including specifications and written selection procedures (lowest bids), Include Procurement Appendix A, F, G, H or I and Vehicle Specification certification if applies. Third Party Contracts with applicable clauses and bond documents must be included. Cause: The Authority did not follow its own procurement policy. Effect: The Authority is noncompliant with 2 CFR 200 and its own procurement policy. Directive: We direct the Authority review and update its procurement policy and implement procedures to ensure that the Authority is complying with the federal requirements, required forms are being completed, and documentation is being maintained. Management’s Response--Corrective Action Plan: Contact person is Todd Shurn, Executive Director, 275 East Wall Street, P.O. Box 837, Benton Harbor, Michigan 49023. Telephone (269) 927-2268. The Authority acknowledges the finding and is currently working to correct this.

Failure to Follow Procurement Policy Finding 2024-002 Condition: The Authority did not comply with the current procurement policy as procedures were not fully followed and forms required by the Authority’s procurement policy were not completed for the heating ventilation and cooling project, new roof, and electric vehicle charging stations. The following forms required by either 2 CFR 200 and/or the Authority’s own procurement policy were not completed for the current year capital asset purchases: Written Record of Procurement Checklist Form, Method of Procurement Decision Matrix, Advertisement and Solicitation Form, Bid Quotations, Fewer Than 3 Offers Received Evaluation if applicable, Proposal Tabulation, Certification of Compliance with Federal Clauses for the assets less than $25,000, and Responsibility Determination (sam.gov debarred verification). Criteria: The following requirements are documented in 2 CFR 200-Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards. 2 CFR 200.214 Suspension and Debarment Non-Federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. 2 CFR Part 200.318 General Procurement Standards (a) The Non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. (i) the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. 2 CFR 200.320 Methods of Procurement to be Followed (b) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. 2 CFR 200.324 Contract Cost and Price (a) The Non-Federal entity must perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold including contract modifications. The method and degree of analysis is dependent on the facts surrounding the particular procurement situation, but as a starting point, the non-Federal entity must make independent estimates before receiving bids or proposals. Concurrently, the Authority’s did not comply with its own current procurement policy as it did not follow or prepare the required documentation detailed in the following sections. Procurement Requests-The Authority will maintain sufficient records to detail the history of a procurement. Such records shall include method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection (or rejection), and the contract price. The Authority will treat any prospective contractor or sub-contractor listed on a centralized State government debarment and suspension list as nonresponsible and ineligible for contract award. Debarment and Suspension- The Authority will treat any prospective contractor or sub-contractor listed on a centralized State government debarment and suspension list as non-responsible and ineligible for contract awards. To see if a prospective contractor is eligible, we will look on the website www.SAM.gov and when the bid has been received. Methods of Procurement- a. Micro and Emergency Purchases (do not exceed $10,000)-(a) A written determination as to why price is deemed fair and reasonable must be on file with each purchase made under this method of procurement using Micro-Purchase Price Reasonableness Determination Form. (b) Splitting of procurements to avoid the competitive procurement requirements of federal and state statues shall not be condoned. b. Small Purchase Procurement ($10,000 to $250,000)-(a) A minimum of two price or rate quotations shall be obtained from qualified sources; (b) The procurement will be made from the lowest priced qualified bid, if products or goods are equal; (c) MDOT requires for procurements under $25,000.00. Included Procurement Appendix A, B, E, F, G, H, or I and Vehicle Specification certification if applies. (d) MDOT requires for procurements over $25,000.00 solicitations, including specifications and written selection procedures (lowest bids), Include Procurement Appendix A, F, G, H or I and Vehicle Specification certification if applies. Third Party Contracts with applicable clauses and bond documents must be included. Cause: The Authority did not follow its own procurement policy. Effect: The Authority is noncompliant with 2 CFR 200 and its own procurement policy. Directive: We direct the Authority review and update its procurement policy and implement procedures to ensure that the Authority is complying with the federal requirements, required forms are being completed, and documentation is being maintained. Management’s Response--Corrective Action Plan: Contact person is Todd Shurn, Executive Director, 275 East Wall Street, P.O. Box 837, Benton Harbor, Michigan 49023. Telephone (269) 927-2268. The Authority acknowledges the finding and is currently working to correct this.

Reference Number: 2024-002 Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension/Debarment Type of Finding: Compliance Internal Control Impact: Significant Deficiency Compliance Impact: Nonmaterial Noncompliance AL Number(s) and Title(s): 10.553 and 10.555 – Child Nutrition Cluster Federal Awarding Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Federal Award Number: 255AL322N1199 Pass-through Entity: Alabama Department of Education Pass-through Award Number: None Questioned Costs: $62,778.22 Child Nutrition Cluster funds were used to pay $62,778.22 for services and supplies without obtaining required quotes. The U. S. Code of Federal Regulations Title 2, Part 200.320(a), of the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) states that the recipient or subrecipient is responsible for determining and documenting an appropriate micro-purchase threshold based on internal controls, an evaluation of risk, and its documented procurement procedures. The Board’s documented procurement procedures state that the procurement transactions for federal programs and child nutrition programs that are not subject to the state procurement laws but exceed the aggregate amount of the federal micro-purchase threshold of $10,000 will be obtained by utilizing price or rate quotes from two or more qualified sources. Septic tank services, equipment maintenance/repair services, and kitchen supplies in the amount of $62,778.22 were paid from Child Nutrition Cluster funds. The Board failed to obtain price or rate quotes from an adequate number of qualified sources during the audit period. As a result, the Board failed to comply with the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, 2 CFR 320(a). Recommendation: The Board should comply with the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) 2 CFR 200.320 by following its documented procurement procedures. Views of Responsible Officials of the Auditee Management agrees with this finding and will take corrective actions.

Reference Number: 2024-002 Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension/Debarment Type of Finding: Compliance Internal Control Impact: Significant Deficiency Compliance Impact: Nonmaterial Noncompliance AL Number(s) and Title(s): 10.553 and 10.555 – Child Nutrition Cluster Federal Awarding Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Federal Award Number: 255AL322N1199 Pass-through Entity: Alabama Department of Education Pass-through Award Number: None Questioned Costs: $62,778.22 Child Nutrition Cluster funds were used to pay $62,778.22 for services and supplies without obtaining required quotes. The U. S. Code of Federal Regulations Title 2, Part 200.320(a), of the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) states that the recipient or subrecipient is responsible for determining and documenting an appropriate micro-purchase threshold based on internal controls, an evaluation of risk, and its documented procurement procedures. The Board’s documented procurement procedures state that the procurement transactions for federal programs and child nutrition programs that are not subject to the state procurement laws but exceed the aggregate amount of the federal micro-purchase threshold of $10,000 will be obtained by utilizing price or rate quotes from two or more qualified sources. Septic tank services, equipment maintenance/repair services, and kitchen supplies in the amount of $62,778.22 were paid from Child Nutrition Cluster funds. The Board failed to obtain price or rate quotes from an adequate number of qualified sources during the audit period. As a result, the Board failed to comply with the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, 2 CFR 320(a). Recommendation: The Board should comply with the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) 2 CFR 200.320 by following its documented procurement procedures. Views of Responsible Officials of the Auditee Management agrees with this finding and will take corrective actions.