Federal Agency: U.S. Department of the Treasury Federal Program Name: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Pass-Through Agency: State of Arizona, the Office of the Governor Pass-Through Number(s): GR-ARPA-HHF-030122-01 and GR-ARPA-090121-01 Award Period: January 1, 2022 ? November 30, 2024 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance and Other Matters Condition/Context: The Organization did not maintain a formalized and written procurement policy. In addition, the Organization did follow the required solicitation process as follows: 1. Small purchase procedures for one vendor, with costs between $10,000 and $250,000 related to grant management and financial oversight, were not performed. 2. Formal procurement methods or noncompetitive procurement procedures for one vendor, with costs exceeding $250,000 related to mental health services, were not performed. The Organization contracted with this mental health vendor prior to accepting the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds and subsequently did not go through formal procurement procedures. 3. For two vendors, procedures to determine that the vendors were not included on the suspended or debarred vendor list maintained by the General Services Administration, were not performed. Criteria or specific requirement: In accordance with the Compliance Supplement, Part 6 ? Internal Control, 2 CFR section 200.303 requires that nonfederal entities receiving federal awards establish and maintain internal control over the federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal awards. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.318 (a), the non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in ?? 200.317 through 200.327. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.320 (a)(2)(i), the non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and ?? 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. Small purchase procedures - the acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. Criteria or specific requirement (Continued) In accordance with 2 CFR 200.320 (b)(1 and 2), the non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and ?? 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. Formal procurement methods - when the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal financial assistance award exceeds the SAT, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require following documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a non-competitive procurement can be used in accordance with ? 200.319 or paragraph (c) of this section. The following formal methods of procurement are used for procurement of property or services above the simplified acquisition threshold or a value below the simplified acquisition threshold the non-Federal entity determines to be appropriate: (1) sealed bids, or (2) proposals. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.320 (c), the non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and ?? 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. Noncompetitive procurement. There are specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. Noncompetitive procurement - can only be awarded if one or more of the following circumstances apply: (1) The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold (see paragraph (a)(1) of this section); (2) The item is available only from a single source; (3) The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from publicizing a competitive solicitation; (4) The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity expressly authorizes a noncompetitive procurement in response to a written request from the non-Federal entity; or (5) After solicitation of a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate. In accordance with 2 CFR 180.220, the non-Federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. ?Covered transactions? include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220). All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. Questioned costs: None Cause: The Organization did not have established procurement policies and did not have internal controls designed to ensure compliance with those policies. Effect: The Organization was not in compliance with the Compliance Supplement and the Code of Federal Regulations related to procurement and suspension and debarment provisions. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization adopt a formal and written procurement policy. Additionally, management should develop controls to help ensure procurement procedures are followed and to monitor the amount spent with vendors throughout the year to ensure procurement procedures are initiated when the vendor costs exceed the procurement thresholds. These procedures will help ensure compliance with Compliance Supplement and the Code of Federal Regulations related to procurement and suspension and debarment provisions. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the audit condition.
2022-002: U.S. Department of Environment Protection ? Assistance Listing # 66.468 Capitalization Grants for Drinking Water State Revolving Fund (Drinking Water State Revolving Fund Cluster) Lack of Required Written Policies & Procedures ? Compliance Condition & Criteria: The Authority does not currently have all the written policies and procedures in place as required by the Uniform Guidance as it relates to financial management and determining allowability of costs for the federal program (Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 200.302 & 200.305). In addition CFR sections 200.318, 200.319, and 200.320 require there to be written policies and procedures regarding procurement and conflicts of interest. Effect: Although not likely, the oversight agency could disallow all costs associated with this program. Cause: This is the Authority?s first time subject to the requirements of the Uniform Guidance as they have not had any significant federal grant funding in a number of years. The Authority does have a set of informal policies and procedures that are followed as it relates to financial management, allowability of costs, procurement, and conflicts of interest, and have been very careful to carry out all federal program activities in accordance with established regulations; however the Authority was simply not aware of the requirement that these polices and procedures be documented in writing. Recommendation: We recommend that the Authority work towards getting those policies and procedures documented in writing so that they are in compliance with the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The Authority understand the potential effects of the condition described above and will work towards getting the necessary policies and procedures in place as they relate to federal programs documented in writing.
Federal Agency: Department of Treasury Federal Program Name: COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF) Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Award Period: March 3, 2021 ? December 31, 2024 Compliance Requirement: Procurement Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance, Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Recipients may use award funds to enter into contracts to procure goods and services necessary to implement one or more of the eligible purposes outlined in sections 602(c) and 603(c) of the Act and Treasury?s Interim Final Rule and Final Rule. As such, recipients are expected to have procurement policies and procedures in place that comply with the procurement standards outlined in the Uniform Guidance. All other entities under the program, including subrecipients of a state, must follow the procurement standards in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.327, including ensuring that the procurement method used for the contracts are appropriate based on the dollar amount and conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320. Condition: During our testing of internal control over procurement for CSLFRF, we noted the City did not have effective control over compliance. Questioned costs: None. Context: In our sample of five cases, there was one instance where the City did not follow its procurement policies and procedures. Cause: The City did not have adequate controls in place to ensure contracts it entered into followed its procurement policies and procedures. Effect: The City could obtain property and services in a manner that does not allow for cost-effectiveness nor providing full and open competition. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the City implement controls to ensure its procurement policies and procedures are followed prior to entering into contracts. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Finding 2022-001: Noncompliance with Procurement Policy Requirements Programs - CFDA 21.023 Emergency Rental Assistance Program, and CFDA 93.391 Activities to Support State, Tribal, Local, and Territorial (STLT) Health Department Response to Public Health or Healthcare Crisis Criteria: As required by 2 CFR 200, Subparts D and E (2 CFR sections 200.300 and 200.400, respectively), entities are required to maintain written policies, procedures, and standards of conduct (?policies?) for certain areas of its operation. The following sections of the Uniform Guidance require nonfederal entities that receive federal awards to establish written policies, procedures, or standards of conduct: ? Financial management (200.302) ? Federal payment (200.305) ? General procurement standards (200.318) ? Competition (200.319) ? Methods of procurement to be followed (200.320) ? Compensation?fringe benefits (200.431) ? Relocation costs of employees (200.464) ? Travel costs (200.475) Condition: Review of the Organization?s Financial Procedure manual noted it was updated August 2023, with the previous update being done in February 2014 ? prior to the year under audit. The 2014 update did not contain all of the required elements under 2 CFR 200, Subparts D and E (2 CFR sections 200.300 and 200.400). Cause: The Financial Procedures have not been updated recently to incorporate the current Federal regulation requirements. Effect: The Organization is not compliant with Federal regulations requiring written policies and procedures. Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization approve and incorporate the policy updates incorporated within the August 2023 updated policies and procedures to ensure compliance with required regulations. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with this recommendation and will review and update its current Financial Procedures to ensure compliance.
Finding 2022-001: Noncompliance with Procurement Policy Requirements Programs - CFDA 21.023 Emergency Rental Assistance Program, and CFDA 93.391 Activities to Support State, Tribal, Local, and Territorial (STLT) Health Department Response to Public Health or Healthcare Crisis Criteria: As required by 2 CFR 200, Subparts D and E (2 CFR sections 200.300 and 200.400, respectively), entities are required to maintain written policies, procedures, and standards of conduct (?policies?) for certain areas of its operation. The following sections of the Uniform Guidance require nonfederal entities that receive federal awards to establish written policies, procedures, or standards of conduct: ? Financial management (200.302) ? Federal payment (200.305) ? General procurement standards (200.318) ? Competition (200.319) ? Methods of procurement to be followed (200.320) ? Compensation?fringe benefits (200.431) ? Relocation costs of employees (200.464) ? Travel costs (200.475) Condition: Review of the Organization?s Financial Procedure manual noted it was updated August 2023, with the previous update being done in February 2014 ? prior to the year under audit. The 2014 update did not contain all of the required elements under 2 CFR 200, Subparts D and E (2 CFR sections 200.300 and 200.400). Cause: The Financial Procedures have not been updated recently to incorporate the current Federal regulation requirements. Effect: The Organization is not compliant with Federal regulations requiring written policies and procedures. Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization approve and incorporate the policy updates incorporated within the August 2023 updated policies and procedures to ensure compliance with required regulations. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with this recommendation and will review and update its current Financial Procedures to ensure compliance.
Finding 2022-001: Noncompliance with Procurement Policy Requirements Programs - CFDA 21.023 Emergency Rental Assistance Program, and CFDA 93.391 Activities to Support State, Tribal, Local, and Territorial (STLT) Health Department Response to Public Health or Healthcare Crisis Criteria: As required by 2 CFR 200, Subparts D and E (2 CFR sections 200.300 and 200.400, respectively), entities are required to maintain written policies, procedures, and standards of conduct (?policies?) for certain areas of its operation. The following sections of the Uniform Guidance require nonfederal entities that receive federal awards to establish written policies, procedures, or standards of conduct: ? Financial management (200.302) ? Federal payment (200.305) ? General procurement standards (200.318) ? Competition (200.319) ? Methods of procurement to be followed (200.320) ? Compensation?fringe benefits (200.431) ? Relocation costs of employees (200.464) ? Travel costs (200.475) Condition: Review of the Organization?s Financial Procedure manual noted it was updated August 2023, with the previous update being done in February 2014 ? prior to the year under audit. The 2014 update did not contain all of the required elements under 2 CFR 200, Subparts D and E (2 CFR sections 200.300 and 200.400). Cause: The Financial Procedures have not been updated recently to incorporate the current Federal regulation requirements. Effect: The Organization is not compliant with Federal regulations requiring written policies and procedures. Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization approve and incorporate the policy updates incorporated within the August 2023 updated policies and procedures to ensure compliance with required regulations. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with this recommendation and will review and update its current Financial Procedures to ensure compliance.
Repeat of Prior Audit Finding 2021-004 Federal Program: Trans-National Crime Federal Agencies: United States Department of State- United States Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs Federal Assistance Listing Number: 19.705 Federal Award Year: December 31, 2022 Criteria: 2 CFR Part 200 Subpart D Section 200.320 identifies small purchases as purchases greater than the micro-purchase threshold but not exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold. For small purchases, rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. 2 CFR Part 200 Subpart D Section 200.320 (c) of the Uniform Guidance establishes specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. Condition/Context: For the selection of 2 subcontractors which was utilized by Panthera Corporation during the year that received federal expenditures greater than the micro-purchase threshold, but did not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, this purchase did not go through a procurement process. Management asserted that one subcontractor came highly recommended and the other was due to space limitations for an event, however, Panthera Corporation did not document these rationales at the time the contract was awarded, nor were they able to provide documentation that the subcontractors satisfied the specific circumstances for which noncompetitive procurement can be used. This was not a statistically valid sample. Questioned Costs: Not determinable Cause: Panthera Corporation developed written procurement procedures, however, did not follow such procedures in obtaining competitive bids or maintaining documentation to support why competitive bids could not be obtained. Effect: Panthera Corporation's control design and operation does not provide reasonable assurance that Panthera Corporation is managing the procurement compliance requirement of the Uniform Guidance. Recommendation: We recommend that Panthera Corporation follow its policies and procedures by ensuring that purchases requiring procurement go through the appropriate procurement process as well as maintaining documentation to allow for an audit trail. Views of Responsible Officials: Management acknowledges the finding and has implemented an approval process.
2022-003 ? Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Federal program information: Funding Agency: U.S. Departments of the Treasury and Health and Human Services Title: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds and Indian Health Services Self-Governance Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 and 93.210 Award Periods: March 3, 2021 ? December 31, 2024 Criteria: Uniform Guidance regulations section CFR 200.318(a) and CFR 200.320(a) state, the non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable state, local, and tribal laws and regulations, provided that the procurement conform to applicable federal law and the standards identified. Procurement by micro-purchase is the acquisition of supplies or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold. During 2022, the Tribe?s procurement policy has a micro purchase threshold of $2,000. The Tribe?s policy states ?Duckwater will conduct procurement in a manner that prohibits the use of statutorily or administratively imposed data, local, or tribal geographical preferences in the evaluation of bids or proposals?. Recipients of federal awards must not contract with or make sub-awards to parties that are suspended or debarred. Contractors receiving individual awards for $25,000 or more and all sub-recipients must certify that the organization and its principals are not suspended or debarred. This verification may be accomplished by checking the Systems for Award Management (SAM) website, collecting a certification from the entity, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that entity. Condition: The Tribe does not have a policy in place to ensure vendors are not suspended or disbarred. In addition, we found the following: ? Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds: We reviewed five vendors that were paid in excess of $2,000; however, we were not provided with bids or quotes for these purchases. In addition, for two vendors that were paid over $25,000, there was no documentation verifying that the vendors were checked for suspension and debarment. ? Indian Health Services Self-Governance: We reviewed six vendors that were paid in excess of $2,000; however, we were not provided with bids or quotes. In addition, for one vendor that was paid over $25,000, there was no documentation verifying that the vendor was checked for suspension and debarment. Context: For Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, nine of forty-four expenditures tested. For Indian Health Services Self-Governance, ten of forty-four expenditures tested. Some of the expenditures mentioned above were paid to the same vendor. Questioned Costs: None. Cause: The Tribe?s procurement policies and procedures were not enforced during the year. In addition, the Tribe did not have suspension and debarment policies and procedures established during the year. Effect: The Tribe is not always ensuring that all goods and services are obtained at a fair price and the Tribe is not in compliance with their procurement policy. Lastly, the Tribe is not ensuring that vendors doing business under federal awards are properly reviewed for suspension and debarment. Auditors? Recommendation: Enforce procurement policies and procedures at all times. In addition, Tribe should consider increasing the procurement threshold to match the micro-purchase threshold of $10,000 set by the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) as well as adding a number of bids or quotes to be obtained. Lastly, the Tribe should add a suspension and debarment policy to their policies and procedures. This verification may be accomplished by checking the Systems for Award Management (SAM) website, collecting a certification from the entity, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that entity. Management Response: The Tribe will amend its Financial Management System to increase the micro-purchase procurement threshold from $2,000 to $10,000, set by the Federal Acquisition Regulation. When processing purchase orders, the purchasing clerk will verify that a minimum of three bids or quotes have been submitted with the purchase order request, for those items costing $10,000 or more. This requirement will help ensure that goods and services are being obtained at a fair price. The Tribe will also amend its Financial Management System to include a policy on suspension and debarment. For purchases exceeding $25,000, the Finance Manager will perform a search of the vendor on the Systems for Award Management (SAM) website, to verify that the vendor receiving payment has not been suspended or debarred.
2022-003 ? Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Federal program information: Funding Agency: U.S. Departments of the Treasury and Health and Human Services Title: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds and Indian Health Services Self-Governance Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 and 93.210 Award Periods: March 3, 2021 ? December 31, 2024 Criteria: Uniform Guidance regulations section CFR 200.318(a) and CFR 200.320(a) state, the non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable state, local, and tribal laws and regulations, provided that the procurement conform to applicable federal law and the standards identified. Procurement by micro-purchase is the acquisition of supplies or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold. During 2022, the Tribe?s procurement policy has a micro purchase threshold of $2,000. The Tribe?s policy states ?Duckwater will conduct procurement in a manner that prohibits the use of statutorily or administratively imposed data, local, or tribal geographical preferences in the evaluation of bids or proposals?. Recipients of federal awards must not contract with or make sub-awards to parties that are suspended or debarred. Contractors receiving individual awards for $25,000 or more and all sub-recipients must certify that the organization and its principals are not suspended or debarred. This verification may be accomplished by checking the Systems for Award Management (SAM) website, collecting a certification from the entity, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that entity. Condition: The Tribe does not have a policy in place to ensure vendors are not suspended or disbarred. In addition, we found the following: ? Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds: We reviewed five vendors that were paid in excess of $2,000; however, we were not provided with bids or quotes for these purchases. In addition, for two vendors that were paid over $25,000, there was no documentation verifying that the vendors were checked for suspension and debarment. ? Indian Health Services Self-Governance: We reviewed six vendors that were paid in excess of $2,000; however, we were not provided with bids or quotes. In addition, for one vendor that was paid over $25,000, there was no documentation verifying that the vendor was checked for suspension and debarment. Context: For Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, nine of forty-four expenditures tested. For Indian Health Services Self-Governance, ten of forty-four expenditures tested. Some of the expenditures mentioned above were paid to the same vendor. Questioned Costs: None. Cause: The Tribe?s procurement policies and procedures were not enforced during the year. In addition, the Tribe did not have suspension and debarment policies and procedures established during the year. Effect: The Tribe is not always ensuring that all goods and services are obtained at a fair price and the Tribe is not in compliance with their procurement policy. Lastly, the Tribe is not ensuring that vendors doing business under federal awards are properly reviewed for suspension and debarment. Auditors? Recommendation: Enforce procurement policies and procedures at all times. In addition, Tribe should consider increasing the procurement threshold to match the micro-purchase threshold of $10,000 set by the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) as well as adding a number of bids or quotes to be obtained. Lastly, the Tribe should add a suspension and debarment policy to their policies and procedures. This verification may be accomplished by checking the Systems for Award Management (SAM) website, collecting a certification from the entity, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that entity. Management Response: The Tribe will amend its Financial Management System to increase the micro-purchase procurement threshold from $2,000 to $10,000, set by the Federal Acquisition Regulation. When processing purchase orders, the purchasing clerk will verify that a minimum of three bids or quotes have been submitted with the purchase order request, for those items costing $10,000 or more. This requirement will help ensure that goods and services are being obtained at a fair price. The Tribe will also amend its Financial Management System to include a policy on suspension and debarment. For purchases exceeding $25,000, the Finance Manager will perform a search of the vendor on the Systems for Award Management (SAM) website, to verify that the vendor receiving payment has not been suspended or debarred.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 includes requirements related to internal controls for federal award programs, including that the Organization must, among other things, ?establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award.? These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework?, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)?. Additionally, Uniform Guidance requires non-Federal entities receiving Federal funds to have certain written policies, procedures, and standards of conduct (policies) in place. Condition and Context: The Organization has been administering the federal award for over a decade and has hired knowledgeable programmatic staff who have created an environment which understands the mission and purpose of the program. These individuals have not adequately documented their policies and procedures to fully establish an appropriate system of internal control over compliance. This includes a lack of required written policies as well as inadequate documentation of routine control functions such as those items noted in 2022-002 below. The lack of written policies includes required policies under Uniform Guidance sections ?200.302 (b)(6), ?200.302 (b)(7), ?200.305 (b), ?200.319 (c)(1), ?200.319 (c)(2) and ?200.320 (d)(3). Cause and Effect: The lack of appropriate controls and documentation to support processes surrounding the use of federal funds may result in undetected or uncorrected misstatements or instances of noncompliance. The lack of adequate documentation resulted in finding 2022-002 below. Additionally, as the policies referenced above are not written, the Organization cannot be in compliance with the requirements. Recommendation: The Organization should consider implementing policies, procedures, and internal controls specific to federal awards. Policies should be implemented for all applicable compliance requirements, ensuring that there is appropriate documentation to support the controls taking place. We recommend the policies noted above be written by the Organization, approved by the Board of Directors, and included in the permanent files of the Organization. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the recommendation and has implemented their corrective actions as of the date the financial statements were available for issuance.
FINDING 2022-001 Procurement, Suspension and Debarment (Repeat Finding 2021-001) Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Federal Program: 21.027 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF) Criteria: The Department of the Treasury?s Interim Final Rule (Effective May 17, 2021 through March 31, 2022) and the Final Rule (Effective April 1, 2022) encouraged the use of internal Procurement Policies and Procedures when procuring products and/or services. The Department of the Treasury?s Compliance and Reporting Guidance report (Effective June 24, 2021 through April 30, 2025) required recipients (i.e., City of Evanston) to ensure any procurement using CSLFRF funds to be consistent with the procurement standards set forth in the Uniform Guidance at 2 CFR 200.317 through 2 CFR 200.327 as applicable. Procurement Standards of Title 2 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Costs Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) state that all non-federal entities will follow Section 200.318 through Section 200.327. A. Section 200.320 identifies four methods of procurement to be followed, among the methods of procurement the below are three identified thresholds: (a) Informal ? micro purchases (any amount up to $10,000) (b) Informal ? small purchases ($10,000.01 to $249,999.99) (c) Formal ? sealed bids ($250,000 and above) (d) Noncompetitive procurement B. The City of Evanston Purchasing Manual requires the collection of three written quotes for any purchase between $2,500 and $25,000 purchased with federal grant funds, a formal bid process (Bid, RFP, RFQ) for any purchase $25,000 or above purchased with federal grant funds, and a justification memo for a sole source purchase for any amount above $2,500 purchased with federal grant funds. C. The City of Evanston Purchasing Manual requires that for purchases above $2,500 but less than $10,000, approval signature must be obtained from the Department Director. All purchases above $10,000 require approval signature from the City Manager. Purchases above $25,000 must also be approved by the City Council. D. Per Title 2 CFR section 180.300, participant entering into a covered transaction must verify that the person with whom it intends to do business is not excluded or disqualified by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. E. Title 2 CFR section 200.303 states the following regarding internal control: ?The auditee shall maintain internal control over Federal programs that provides reasonable assurance that the auditee is managing Federal awards in compliance with law, regulations, and the provisions of contracts or grant agreements that could have a material effect on each of its Federal programs.? Condition/Context: 1. We tested nine purchase orders totaling $2,408,526. Our procedures revealed the following: a. Two (2) purchase orders in the amount of $27,739 and $150,525 respectively, were purchases greater than $25,000 each, and for which the City of Evanston did not complete a formal procurement process (competitively bid) following its own Purchasing Manual and/or obtain the required three quotations following Section 200.320 of Title 2 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). b. For seven (7) purchase orders totaling $2,391,116, documentation demonstrating that suspension and debarment searches were performed could not be provided by the City of Evanston. c. For one (1) purchase order totaling $700,405, procurement documentation was not provided nor retained by the City of Evanston from third party procurement service provider. Cause: 1. The City of Evanston?s procurement policies do not include processes pertaining to monitoring and review procedures of procurement processes conducted by external procurement service providers to ensure compliance with all applicable procurement policies. 2. The City of Evanston?s procurement policies do not include processes pertaining to entity-wide suspension and debarment checks. 3. Where policies are in place for internal procurement they are not being followed. Effect: City of Evanston is not in compliance with Title 2 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200 and the requirements outlined in the City of Evanston Purchasing Manual as it relates to purchases above $25,000. Additionally, the effect of noncompliance can result in questioned costs. Recommendation: We recommend that City of Evanston: a. Implement structures to monitor external procurement service providers to ensure their procurement methods comply with applicable federal compliance requirements. b. Further expand Purchasing Manual to include policies and procedures for suspension and debarment searches and retaining support for suspension and debarment check. c. Communicate and re-enforce its procurement policies and procedures to ensure compliance with applicable requirements. d. Centralize the procurement process to ensure all departments are following applicable procedures in a uniform manner. Views of Responsible Officials: The City of Evanston implemented a revised Purchasing Manual as of March 2023. We agree with the auditor?s recommendations and will further review and revise the Purchasing Manual and communicate and reinforce policies and procedures to all departments to ensure compliance with applicable requirements.
FINDING 2022-001 Procurement, Suspension and Debarment (Repeat Finding 2021-001) Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Federal Program: 21.027 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF) Criteria: The Department of the Treasury?s Interim Final Rule (Effective May 17, 2021 through March 31, 2022) and the Final Rule (Effective April 1, 2022) encouraged the use of internal Procurement Policies and Procedures when procuring products and/or services. The Department of the Treasury?s Compliance and Reporting Guidance report (Effective June 24, 2021 through April 30, 2025) required recipients (i.e., City of Evanston) to ensure any procurement using CSLFRF funds to be consistent with the procurement standards set forth in the Uniform Guidance at 2 CFR 200.317 through 2 CFR 200.327 as applicable. Procurement Standards of Title 2 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Costs Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) state that all non-federal entities will follow Section 200.318 through Section 200.327. A. Section 200.320 identifies four methods of procurement to be followed, among the methods of procurement the below are three identified thresholds: (a) Informal ? micro purchases (any amount up to $10,000) (b) Informal ? small purchases ($10,000.01 to $249,999.99) (c) Formal ? sealed bids ($250,000 and above) (d) Noncompetitive procurement B. The City of Evanston Purchasing Manual requires the collection of three written quotes for any purchase between $2,500 and $25,000 purchased with federal grant funds, a formal bid process (Bid, RFP, RFQ) for any purchase $25,000 or above purchased with federal grant funds, and a justification memo for a sole source purchase for any amount above $2,500 purchased with federal grant funds. C. The City of Evanston Purchasing Manual requires that for purchases above $2,500 but less than $10,000, approval signature must be obtained from the Department Director. All purchases above $10,000 require approval signature from the City Manager. Purchases above $25,000 must also be approved by the City Council. D. Per Title 2 CFR section 180.300, participant entering into a covered transaction must verify that the person with whom it intends to do business is not excluded or disqualified by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. E. Title 2 CFR section 200.303 states the following regarding internal control: ?The auditee shall maintain internal control over Federal programs that provides reasonable assurance that the auditee is managing Federal awards in compliance with law, regulations, and the provisions of contracts or grant agreements that could have a material effect on each of its Federal programs.? Condition/Context: 1. We tested nine purchase orders totaling $2,408,526. Our procedures revealed the following: a. Two (2) purchase orders in the amount of $27,739 and $150,525 respectively, were purchases greater than $25,000 each, and for which the City of Evanston did not complete a formal procurement process (competitively bid) following its own Purchasing Manual and/or obtain the required three quotations following Section 200.320 of Title 2 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). b. For seven (7) purchase orders totaling $2,391,116, documentation demonstrating that suspension and debarment searches were performed could not be provided by the City of Evanston. c. For one (1) purchase order totaling $700,405, procurement documentation was not provided nor retained by the City of Evanston from third party procurement service provider. Cause: 1. The City of Evanston?s procurement policies do not include processes pertaining to monitoring and review procedures of procurement processes conducted by external procurement service providers to ensure compliance with all applicable procurement policies. 2. The City of Evanston?s procurement policies do not include processes pertaining to entity-wide suspension and debarment checks. 3. Where policies are in place for internal procurement they are not being followed. Effect: City of Evanston is not in compliance with Title 2 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200 and the requirements outlined in the City of Evanston Purchasing Manual as it relates to purchases above $25,000. Additionally, the effect of noncompliance can result in questioned costs. Recommendation: We recommend that City of Evanston: a. Implement structures to monitor external procurement service providers to ensure their procurement methods comply with applicable federal compliance requirements. b. Further expand Purchasing Manual to include policies and procedures for suspension and debarment searches and retaining support for suspension and debarment check. c. Communicate and re-enforce its procurement policies and procedures to ensure compliance with applicable requirements. d. Centralize the procurement process to ensure all departments are following applicable procedures in a uniform manner. Views of Responsible Officials: The City of Evanston implemented a revised Purchasing Manual as of March 2023. We agree with the auditor?s recommendations and will further review and revise the Purchasing Manual and communicate and reinforce policies and procedures to all departments to ensure compliance with applicable requirements.
FINDING 2022-001 Procurement, Suspension and Debarment (Repeat Finding 2021-001) Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Federal Program: 21.027 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF) Criteria: The Department of the Treasury?s Interim Final Rule (Effective May 17, 2021 through March 31, 2022) and the Final Rule (Effective April 1, 2022) encouraged the use of internal Procurement Policies and Procedures when procuring products and/or services. The Department of the Treasury?s Compliance and Reporting Guidance report (Effective June 24, 2021 through April 30, 2025) required recipients (i.e., City of Evanston) to ensure any procurement using CSLFRF funds to be consistent with the procurement standards set forth in the Uniform Guidance at 2 CFR 200.317 through 2 CFR 200.327 as applicable. Procurement Standards of Title 2 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Costs Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) state that all non-federal entities will follow Section 200.318 through Section 200.327. A. Section 200.320 identifies four methods of procurement to be followed, among the methods of procurement the below are three identified thresholds: (a) Informal ? micro purchases (any amount up to $10,000) (b) Informal ? small purchases ($10,000.01 to $249,999.99) (c) Formal ? sealed bids ($250,000 and above) (d) Noncompetitive procurement B. The City of Evanston Purchasing Manual requires the collection of three written quotes for any purchase between $2,500 and $25,000 purchased with federal grant funds, a formal bid process (Bid, RFP, RFQ) for any purchase $25,000 or above purchased with federal grant funds, and a justification memo for a sole source purchase for any amount above $2,500 purchased with federal grant funds. C. The City of Evanston Purchasing Manual requires that for purchases above $2,500 but less than $10,000, approval signature must be obtained from the Department Director. All purchases above $10,000 require approval signature from the City Manager. Purchases above $25,000 must also be approved by the City Council. D. Per Title 2 CFR section 180.300, participant entering into a covered transaction must verify that the person with whom it intends to do business is not excluded or disqualified by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. E. Title 2 CFR section 200.303 states the following regarding internal control: ?The auditee shall maintain internal control over Federal programs that provides reasonable assurance that the auditee is managing Federal awards in compliance with law, regulations, and the provisions of contracts or grant agreements that could have a material effect on each of its Federal programs.? Condition/Context: 1. We tested nine purchase orders totaling $2,408,526. Our procedures revealed the following: a. Two (2) purchase orders in the amount of $27,739 and $150,525 respectively, were purchases greater than $25,000 each, and for which the City of Evanston did not complete a formal procurement process (competitively bid) following its own Purchasing Manual and/or obtain the required three quotations following Section 200.320 of Title 2 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). b. For seven (7) purchase orders totaling $2,391,116, documentation demonstrating that suspension and debarment searches were performed could not be provided by the City of Evanston. c. For one (1) purchase order totaling $700,405, procurement documentation was not provided nor retained by the City of Evanston from third party procurement service provider. Cause: 1. The City of Evanston?s procurement policies do not include processes pertaining to monitoring and review procedures of procurement processes conducted by external procurement service providers to ensure compliance with all applicable procurement policies. 2. The City of Evanston?s procurement policies do not include processes pertaining to entity-wide suspension and debarment checks. 3. Where policies are in place for internal procurement they are not being followed. Effect: City of Evanston is not in compliance with Title 2 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200 and the requirements outlined in the City of Evanston Purchasing Manual as it relates to purchases above $25,000. Additionally, the effect of noncompliance can result in questioned costs. Recommendation: We recommend that City of Evanston: a. Implement structures to monitor external procurement service providers to ensure their procurement methods comply with applicable federal compliance requirements. b. Further expand Purchasing Manual to include policies and procedures for suspension and debarment searches and retaining support for suspension and debarment check. c. Communicate and re-enforce its procurement policies and procedures to ensure compliance with applicable requirements. d. Centralize the procurement process to ensure all departments are following applicable procedures in a uniform manner. Views of Responsible Officials: The City of Evanston implemented a revised Purchasing Manual as of March 2023. We agree with the auditor?s recommendations and will further review and revise the Purchasing Manual and communicate and reinforce policies and procedures to all departments to ensure compliance with applicable requirements.
FINDING 2022-001 Procurement, Suspension and Debarment (Repeat Finding 2021-001) Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Federal Program: 21.027 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF) Criteria: The Department of the Treasury?s Interim Final Rule (Effective May 17, 2021 through March 31, 2022) and the Final Rule (Effective April 1, 2022) encouraged the use of internal Procurement Policies and Procedures when procuring products and/or services. The Department of the Treasury?s Compliance and Reporting Guidance report (Effective June 24, 2021 through April 30, 2025) required recipients (i.e., City of Evanston) to ensure any procurement using CSLFRF funds to be consistent with the procurement standards set forth in the Uniform Guidance at 2 CFR 200.317 through 2 CFR 200.327 as applicable. Procurement Standards of Title 2 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Costs Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) state that all non-federal entities will follow Section 200.318 through Section 200.327. A. Section 200.320 identifies four methods of procurement to be followed, among the methods of procurement the below are three identified thresholds: (a) Informal ? micro purchases (any amount up to $10,000) (b) Informal ? small purchases ($10,000.01 to $249,999.99) (c) Formal ? sealed bids ($250,000 and above) (d) Noncompetitive procurement B. The City of Evanston Purchasing Manual requires the collection of three written quotes for any purchase between $2,500 and $25,000 purchased with federal grant funds, a formal bid process (Bid, RFP, RFQ) for any purchase $25,000 or above purchased with federal grant funds, and a justification memo for a sole source purchase for any amount above $2,500 purchased with federal grant funds. C. The City of Evanston Purchasing Manual requires that for purchases above $2,500 but less than $10,000, approval signature must be obtained from the Department Director. All purchases above $10,000 require approval signature from the City Manager. Purchases above $25,000 must also be approved by the City Council. D. Per Title 2 CFR section 180.300, participant entering into a covered transaction must verify that the person with whom it intends to do business is not excluded or disqualified by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. E. Title 2 CFR section 200.303 states the following regarding internal control: ?The auditee shall maintain internal control over Federal programs that provides reasonable assurance that the auditee is managing Federal awards in compliance with law, regulations, and the provisions of contracts or grant agreements that could have a material effect on each of its Federal programs.? Condition/Context: 1. We tested nine purchase orders totaling $2,408,526. Our procedures revealed the following: a. Two (2) purchase orders in the amount of $27,739 and $150,525 respectively, were purchases greater than $25,000 each, and for which the City of Evanston did not complete a formal procurement process (competitively bid) following its own Purchasing Manual and/or obtain the required three quotations following Section 200.320 of Title 2 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). b. For seven (7) purchase orders totaling $2,391,116, documentation demonstrating that suspension and debarment searches were performed could not be provided by the City of Evanston. c. For one (1) purchase order totaling $700,405, procurement documentation was not provided nor retained by the City of Evanston from third party procurement service provider. Cause: 1. The City of Evanston?s procurement policies do not include processes pertaining to monitoring and review procedures of procurement processes conducted by external procurement service providers to ensure compliance with all applicable procurement policies. 2. The City of Evanston?s procurement policies do not include processes pertaining to entity-wide suspension and debarment checks. 3. Where policies are in place for internal procurement they are not being followed. Effect: City of Evanston is not in compliance with Title 2 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200 and the requirements outlined in the City of Evanston Purchasing Manual as it relates to purchases above $25,000. Additionally, the effect of noncompliance can result in questioned costs. Recommendation: We recommend that City of Evanston: a. Implement structures to monitor external procurement service providers to ensure their procurement methods comply with applicable federal compliance requirements. b. Further expand Purchasing Manual to include policies and procedures for suspension and debarment searches and retaining support for suspension and debarment check. c. Communicate and re-enforce its procurement policies and procedures to ensure compliance with applicable requirements. d. Centralize the procurement process to ensure all departments are following applicable procedures in a uniform manner. Views of Responsible Officials: The City of Evanston implemented a revised Purchasing Manual as of March 2023. We agree with the auditor?s recommendations and will further review and revise the Purchasing Manual and communicate and reinforce policies and procedures to all departments to ensure compliance with applicable requirements.
FINDING 2022-001 Procurement, Suspension and Debarment (Repeat Finding 2021-001) Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Federal Program: 21.027 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF) Criteria: The Department of the Treasury?s Interim Final Rule (Effective May 17, 2021 through March 31, 2022) and the Final Rule (Effective April 1, 2022) encouraged the use of internal Procurement Policies and Procedures when procuring products and/or services. The Department of the Treasury?s Compliance and Reporting Guidance report (Effective June 24, 2021 through April 30, 2025) required recipients (i.e., City of Evanston) to ensure any procurement using CSLFRF funds to be consistent with the procurement standards set forth in the Uniform Guidance at 2 CFR 200.317 through 2 CFR 200.327 as applicable. Procurement Standards of Title 2 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Costs Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) state that all non-federal entities will follow Section 200.318 through Section 200.327. A. Section 200.320 identifies four methods of procurement to be followed, among the methods of procurement the below are three identified thresholds: (a) Informal ? micro purchases (any amount up to $10,000) (b) Informal ? small purchases ($10,000.01 to $249,999.99) (c) Formal ? sealed bids ($250,000 and above) (d) Noncompetitive procurement B. The City of Evanston Purchasing Manual requires the collection of three written quotes for any purchase between $2,500 and $25,000 purchased with federal grant funds, a formal bid process (Bid, RFP, RFQ) for any purchase $25,000 or above purchased with federal grant funds, and a justification memo for a sole source purchase for any amount above $2,500 purchased with federal grant funds. C. The City of Evanston Purchasing Manual requires that for purchases above $2,500 but less than $10,000, approval signature must be obtained from the Department Director. All purchases above $10,000 require approval signature from the City Manager. Purchases above $25,000 must also be approved by the City Council. D. Per Title 2 CFR section 180.300, participant entering into a covered transaction must verify that the person with whom it intends to do business is not excluded or disqualified by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. E. Title 2 CFR section 200.303 states the following regarding internal control: ?The auditee shall maintain internal control over Federal programs that provides reasonable assurance that the auditee is managing Federal awards in compliance with law, regulations, and the provisions of contracts or grant agreements that could have a material effect on each of its Federal programs.? Condition/Context: 1. We tested nine purchase orders totaling $2,408,526. Our procedures revealed the following: a. Two (2) purchase orders in the amount of $27,739 and $150,525 respectively, were purchases greater than $25,000 each, and for which the City of Evanston did not complete a formal procurement process (competitively bid) following its own Purchasing Manual and/or obtain the required three quotations following Section 200.320 of Title 2 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). b. For seven (7) purchase orders totaling $2,391,116, documentation demonstrating that suspension and debarment searches were performed could not be provided by the City of Evanston. c. For one (1) purchase order totaling $700,405, procurement documentation was not provided nor retained by the City of Evanston from third party procurement service provider. Cause: 1. The City of Evanston?s procurement policies do not include processes pertaining to monitoring and review procedures of procurement processes conducted by external procurement service providers to ensure compliance with all applicable procurement policies. 2. The City of Evanston?s procurement policies do not include processes pertaining to entity-wide suspension and debarment checks. 3. Where policies are in place for internal procurement they are not being followed. Effect: City of Evanston is not in compliance with Title 2 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200 and the requirements outlined in the City of Evanston Purchasing Manual as it relates to purchases above $25,000. Additionally, the effect of noncompliance can result in questioned costs. Recommendation: We recommend that City of Evanston: a. Implement structures to monitor external procurement service providers to ensure their procurement methods comply with applicable federal compliance requirements. b. Further expand Purchasing Manual to include policies and procedures for suspension and debarment searches and retaining support for suspension and debarment check. c. Communicate and re-enforce its procurement policies and procedures to ensure compliance with applicable requirements. d. Centralize the procurement process to ensure all departments are following applicable procedures in a uniform manner. Views of Responsible Officials: The City of Evanston implemented a revised Purchasing Manual as of March 2023. We agree with the auditor?s recommendations and will further review and revise the Purchasing Manual and communicate and reinforce policies and procedures to all departments to ensure compliance with applicable requirements.
FINDING 2022-001 Procurement, Suspension and Debarment (Repeat Finding 2021-001) Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Federal Program: 21.027 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF) Criteria: The Department of the Treasury?s Interim Final Rule (Effective May 17, 2021 through March 31, 2022) and the Final Rule (Effective April 1, 2022) encouraged the use of internal Procurement Policies and Procedures when procuring products and/or services. The Department of the Treasury?s Compliance and Reporting Guidance report (Effective June 24, 2021 through April 30, 2025) required recipients (i.e., City of Evanston) to ensure any procurement using CSLFRF funds to be consistent with the procurement standards set forth in the Uniform Guidance at 2 CFR 200.317 through 2 CFR 200.327 as applicable. Procurement Standards of Title 2 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Costs Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) state that all non-federal entities will follow Section 200.318 through Section 200.327. A. Section 200.320 identifies four methods of procurement to be followed, among the methods of procurement the below are three identified thresholds: (a) Informal ? micro purchases (any amount up to $10,000) (b) Informal ? small purchases ($10,000.01 to $249,999.99) (c) Formal ? sealed bids ($250,000 and above) (d) Noncompetitive procurement B. The City of Evanston Purchasing Manual requires the collection of three written quotes for any purchase between $2,500 and $25,000 purchased with federal grant funds, a formal bid process (Bid, RFP, RFQ) for any purchase $25,000 or above purchased with federal grant funds, and a justification memo for a sole source purchase for any amount above $2,500 purchased with federal grant funds. C. The City of Evanston Purchasing Manual requires that for purchases above $2,500 but less than $10,000, approval signature must be obtained from the Department Director. All purchases above $10,000 require approval signature from the City Manager. Purchases above $25,000 must also be approved by the City Council. D. Per Title 2 CFR section 180.300, participant entering into a covered transaction must verify that the person with whom it intends to do business is not excluded or disqualified by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. E. Title 2 CFR section 200.303 states the following regarding internal control: ?The auditee shall maintain internal control over Federal programs that provides reasonable assurance that the auditee is managing Federal awards in compliance with law, regulations, and the provisions of contracts or grant agreements that could have a material effect on each of its Federal programs.? Condition/Context: 1. We tested nine purchase orders totaling $2,408,526. Our procedures revealed the following: a. Two (2) purchase orders in the amount of $27,739 and $150,525 respectively, were purchases greater than $25,000 each, and for which the City of Evanston did not complete a formal procurement process (competitively bid) following its own Purchasing Manual and/or obtain the required three quotations following Section 200.320 of Title 2 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). b. For seven (7) purchase orders totaling $2,391,116, documentation demonstrating that suspension and debarment searches were performed could not be provided by the City of Evanston. c. For one (1) purchase order totaling $700,405, procurement documentation was not provided nor retained by the City of Evanston from third party procurement service provider. Cause: 1. The City of Evanston?s procurement policies do not include processes pertaining to monitoring and review procedures of procurement processes conducted by external procurement service providers to ensure compliance with all applicable procurement policies. 2. The City of Evanston?s procurement policies do not include processes pertaining to entity-wide suspension and debarment checks. 3. Where policies are in place for internal procurement they are not being followed. Effect: City of Evanston is not in compliance with Title 2 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200 and the requirements outlined in the City of Evanston Purchasing Manual as it relates to purchases above $25,000. Additionally, the effect of noncompliance can result in questioned costs. Recommendation: We recommend that City of Evanston: a. Implement structures to monitor external procurement service providers to ensure their procurement methods comply with applicable federal compliance requirements. b. Further expand Purchasing Manual to include policies and procedures for suspension and debarment searches and retaining support for suspension and debarment check. c. Communicate and re-enforce its procurement policies and procedures to ensure compliance with applicable requirements. d. Centralize the procurement process to ensure all departments are following applicable procedures in a uniform manner. Views of Responsible Officials: The City of Evanston implemented a revised Purchasing Manual as of March 2023. We agree with the auditor?s recommendations and will further review and revise the Purchasing Manual and communicate and reinforce policies and procedures to all departments to ensure compliance with applicable requirements.
Condition: During our testing and review of the Organization?s procurement policy, we were unable to obtain documentation to support the Organization?s basis for sole source contracts. Additionally, documentation was not available to support the inquiries around suspension and disbarment. Criteria: The Uniform Guidance and 45 CF Part 75 require that non-Federal entities receiving Federal awards establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal laws, regulations, and program compliance requirements. The characteristics of internal controls are presented in the context of the components of internal controls discussed in the Internal Control-Integrated Framework (COSO Report), published by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. The COSO Report provides a framework for organizations to design, implement, and evaluate controls that will facilitate compliance with the requirements of Federal laws, regulations, and program compliance requirements. Per 2 CFR 200.320 General procurement stands: (a) Noncompetitive procurement. There are specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. Noncompetitive procurement can only be awarded if one or more of the following circumstances apply: (1) The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold; (2) The item is available only from a single source; (3) The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from publicizing a competitive solicitation; (4) The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity expressly authorizes a noncompetitive procurement in response to a written request from the non-Federal entity; or (5) After solicitation of a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate. Per 2 CFR 200.318 General procurement stands: (b) The Non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable state, local, and tribal laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal law and the standards identified in this part. Per Uniform Guidance, Non-Federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. ?Covered transactions? include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. When a non-federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the nonfederal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. This verification may be accomplished by (1) checking the System for Award Management (SAM) Exclusions maintained by the General Services Administration (GSA) and available at SAM.gov Home (2) collecting a certification from the entity, or (3) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that entity (2 CFR section 180.300). Cause: The Organization did not apply the required procurement policy relative to sole source contracts in accordance with Uniform Guidance. Management also did not complete a review of vendors/contractors to verify they are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded before contracting. Effect: The Organization does not have adequate documentation to support its sole source procurement and is not in compliance with Federal guidelines. Questioned Costs: Unknown Recommendation: We recommend the Organization update and follow their controls to identify vendors that should go through the procurement process. We also recommend the Organization follow their process to verify that entities are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded annually at time of award and to document those procedures.
2022-001 Procurement Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Federal Program Name: American Rescue Plan Act Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Award Period: March 3, 2021 through December 31, 2024 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Other Matter Criteria or Specific Requirement 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2)(ii) requires that "The non-Federal entity is responsible for determining an appropriate simplified acquisition threshold based on internal controls, an evaluation of risk and its documented procurement procedures which must not exceed the threshold established in the FAR. When applicable, a lower simplified acquisition threshold used by the non-Federal entity must be authorized or not prohibited under State, local, or tribal laws or regulations." When a non-Federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the non-Federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. Condition The City did not follow controls related to ensuring procurement policies were followed. Questioned Costs None. Context While performing compliance procedures, it was noted that the City did not follow adopted policies for procurement. Cause Items purchased through procurement transactions were individually insignificant thus City believed procurement was not applicable. However, when applying the micro purchase threshold, a nonfederal entity should note the threshold applies to the aggregate purchase amount rather than the cost of individual items. Effect The City is not in compliance with procurement requirements. Contracts for construction, non- construction related procurements, and those over the simplified acquisition threshold may not be in compliance with the Uniform Guidance. Repeat Finding No. Recommendation We recommend the City review and update procurement policies for the entire City to ensure they meet the minimum requirements of 2 CFR 200 for all federal grants. View of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the finding.
2022-001 Procurement Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Federal Program Name: American Rescue Plan Act Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Award Period: March 3, 2021 through December 31, 2024 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Other Matter Criteria or Specific Requirement 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2)(ii) requires that "The non-Federal entity is responsible for determining an appropriate simplified acquisition threshold based on internal controls, an evaluation of risk and its documented procurement procedures which must not exceed the threshold established in the FAR. When applicable, a lower simplified acquisition threshold used by the non-Federal entity must be authorized or not prohibited under State, local, or tribal laws or regulations." When a non-Federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the non-Federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. Condition The City did not follow controls related to ensuring procurement policies were followed. Questioned Costs None. Context While performing compliance procedures, it was noted that the City did not follow adopted policies for procurement. Cause Items purchased through procurement transactions were individually insignificant thus City believed procurement was not applicable. However, when applying the micro purchase threshold, a nonfederal entity should note the threshold applies to the aggregate purchase amount rather than the cost of individual items. Effect The City is not in compliance with procurement requirements. Contracts for construction, non- construction related procurements, and those over the simplified acquisition threshold may not be in compliance with the Uniform Guidance. Repeat Finding No. Recommendation We recommend the City review and update procurement policies for the entire City to ensure they meet the minimum requirements of 2 CFR 200 for all federal grants. View of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the finding.
2022-001 Procurement Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Federal Program Name: American Rescue Plan Act Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Award Period: March 3, 2021 through December 31, 2024 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Other Matter Criteria or Specific Requirement 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2)(ii) requires that "The non-Federal entity is responsible for determining an appropriate simplified acquisition threshold based on internal controls, an evaluation of risk and its documented procurement procedures which must not exceed the threshold established in the FAR. When applicable, a lower simplified acquisition threshold used by the non-Federal entity must be authorized or not prohibited under State, local, or tribal laws or regulations." When a non-Federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the non-Federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. Condition The City did not follow controls related to ensuring procurement policies were followed. Questioned Costs None. Context While performing compliance procedures, it was noted that the City did not follow adopted policies for procurement. Cause Items purchased through procurement transactions were individually insignificant thus City believed procurement was not applicable. However, when applying the micro purchase threshold, a nonfederal entity should note the threshold applies to the aggregate purchase amount rather than the cost of individual items. Effect The City is not in compliance with procurement requirements. Contracts for construction, non- construction related procurements, and those over the simplified acquisition threshold may not be in compliance with the Uniform Guidance. Repeat Finding No. Recommendation We recommend the City review and update procurement policies for the entire City to ensure they meet the minimum requirements of 2 CFR 200 for all federal grants. View of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the finding.
2022-001 Procurement Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Federal Program Name: American Rescue Plan Act Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Award Period: March 3, 2021 through December 31, 2024 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Other Matter Criteria or Specific Requirement 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2)(ii) requires that "The non-Federal entity is responsible for determining an appropriate simplified acquisition threshold based on internal controls, an evaluation of risk and its documented procurement procedures which must not exceed the threshold established in the FAR. When applicable, a lower simplified acquisition threshold used by the non-Federal entity must be authorized or not prohibited under State, local, or tribal laws or regulations." When a non-Federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the non-Federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. Condition The City did not follow controls related to ensuring procurement policies were followed. Questioned Costs None. Context While performing compliance procedures, it was noted that the City did not follow adopted policies for procurement. Cause Items purchased through procurement transactions were individually insignificant thus City believed procurement was not applicable. However, when applying the micro purchase threshold, a nonfederal entity should note the threshold applies to the aggregate purchase amount rather than the cost of individual items. Effect The City is not in compliance with procurement requirements. Contracts for construction, non- construction related procurements, and those over the simplified acquisition threshold may not be in compliance with the Uniform Guidance. Repeat Finding No. Recommendation We recommend the City review and update procurement policies for the entire City to ensure they meet the minimum requirements of 2 CFR 200 for all federal grants. View of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the finding.
FINDING 2022-002 Subject: Highway Planning and Construction Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Program: Highway Planning and Construction Cluster Assistance Listings Number: 20.205 Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Numbers): DES: 1902708 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Transportation Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context Procurement Policy The City had a documented procurement policy; however, the policy did not reflect applicable state laws and regulations. In addition, the policy did not include procedures to avoid acquisition of unnecessary or duplicative items, procedures to ensure that all solicitations incorporate a clear and accurate description of the technical requirements for the material, product, or service to be procured or procedures to ensure that all solicitations identify all requirements which the offerors must fulfill and all other factors to be used in evaluating bids or proposals. Procurement and Suspension and Debarment The City purchased CNG refuse haulers totaling $2,144,276 from the sole vendor that fell within the simplified acquisition threshold. The City considered this a special purchase as outlined in the Board of Works Resolution 2021-03. This resolution satisfied state statute for a special purchase as outlined in Indiana Code 5-22-10-9; however, it did not address or meet any of the noncompetitive procurement circumstances as outlined in federal statute. As such, sealed bids or competitive proposals, as required, were not obtained from an adequate number of sources. Additionally, the City did not verify that the vendor was neither suspended, nor debarred, or otherwise excluded or disqualified from participating in federal assistance programs prior to payment to the vendor. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance was isolated to vendor noted above. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.320(b) states in part: "Formal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under the Federal financial assistance award exceeds the SAT, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require following documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a non-competitive procurement can be used in accordance with ? 200.319 or paragraph (c) of this section. The following formal methods of procurement are used for procurement of property or services above the simplified acquisition threshold or a value below the simplified acquisition threshold the non-Federal entity determines to be appropriate: (1) Sealed bids. . . . (ii) If sealed bids are used the following requirements apply: (A) Bids must be solicited from an adequate number of qualified sources . . . (2) Proposals. . . . (i) Requests for proposals must be publicized and identify all evaluation factors and their relative importance. Proposals must be solicited from an adequate number qualified offerors. . . ." 2 CFR 200.320(c) states: "Noncompetitive procurement. There are specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. Noncompetitive procurement can only be awarded if one or more of the following circumstances apply: (1) The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold (see paragraph (a)(1) of this section); (2) The items is available only from a single source; (3) The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from publicizing a competitive solicitation; (4) The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity expressly authorizes a noncompetitive procurement in response to a written request from the non-Federal entity; or (5) After solicitation of a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate." Indiana Code 5-22-10-9 states: "A purchasing agent may make a special purchase when purchase of the required supplies or services under another purchasing method under this article would seriously impair the functioning of the using agency." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause Management had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Effect The failure to establish an effective system of internal controls enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funding to the City. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the City's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure compliance and comply with the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
Criteria: The Uniform Guidance requires nonfederal entities that receive federal awards to establish written policies, procedures, or standards of conduct as described in the following sections: ? Equipment (2 CFR 200.313) ? General procurement standards (2 CFR 200.318) ? Competition (2 CFR 200.319) ? Methods of procurement to be followed (2 CFR 200.320) Condition: The Town did not have written policies, procedures, and standards of conduct relative to federal awards as required by the Uniform Guidance. Cause: The Town was not aware of these requirements. Effect: The Town is not in compliance with the Uniform Guidance with respect to these written policies. Recommendation: We recommend that the Town update its policies and procedures to comply with the Uniform Guidance requirements mentioned above. Management?s Response: Management agrees with the finding.
U.S. Department of Transportation FEDERAL TRANSIT CLUSTER 20.507 Federal Transit Formula Grant (applies to all grants) 20.526 Section 5339 Formula Apportionment 2022-005 Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Criteria: The Uniform Guidance regulations (?200.320) require, among other things, that procurement for purchases of goods and services follow certain procedures related to obtaining and awarding of contracts based on sealed bid, competitive-, and noncompetitive proposals. Additionally, ?200.318(d) provides that written policies and procedures must document the avoidance of the acquisition of unnecessary or duplicative items. In addition, non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with parties that are suspended or debarred. ?Covered transactions? include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. When a non-federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the non-federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. This verification may be accomplished by (1) checking the System for Award Management (SAM) Exclusions maintained by the General Services Administration (GSA) and available at SAM.gov, (2) collecting a certification from the entity, or (3) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that entity (2 CFR section 180.300). Condition: The portion related to procurement is a repeated finding from 2019, 2020 and 2021. During our testing of purchases under the procurement regulations, for 2 out of 10 vendors (paid approximately $1.59 million out of the amount tested of $12.8 million) selected for testing, the System was unable to provide supporting documentation that these vendor services or supplies were procured in accordance with the standards in ?200.320. The universe (population) from which the items were selected was all vendor payments in 2022 over $10,000 consisting of 154 vendors paid approximately $22 million. Additionally, while the System does maintain written policies and procedures related to procurement standards, documentation addressing the acquisition of unnecessary or duplicative items was not present.Condition: During our testing of compliance with the suspension and debarment regulations, for 2 out of 10 vendors selected for testing (same vendors selected for procurement testing above), the System was unable to provide documentation of its conclusions that these vendor were not suspended or debarred. The universe (population) from which the items were selected were all vendor payments in 2022 over $25,000 consisting of 94 vendors paid approximately $21 million. Based on a review of SAM.gov, none of these vendors were suspended or debarred. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Cause: A material weakness exists in the internal controls over procurement and suspension and debarment. The System does not have adequate controls in place to ensure that appropriate supporting documentation is maintained for purchases made under the procurement standards to support the System?s consideration and/or conclusion for obtaining and awarding of contracts based on sealed bid, competitive, and noncompetitive proposals or its determination of whether the vendor is suspended or debarred. Additionally, written policies and procedures for procurement were not reviewed to ensure all requirements under these regulations were addressed. Effect: The System may not be receiving the overall lowest cost for services and supplies procured by the agency. Without ensuring documentation is maintained over whether a vendor is suspended or debarred, the System may enter into contracts with unauthorized parties. Recommendation: We recommend the System implement internal controls to ensure that supporting documentation is maintained for the procurement of goods and services in accordance with ?200.320. Additionally, we recommend that the System enhance its written policies and procedures to ensure that documentation is included regarding the avoidance of the acquisition of unnecessary or duplicative items. Documentation and policies should include procedures for the competitive bidding of bus parts on a quarterly basis and evidence that purchases are from these bid responses and from the lowest qualified vendor. A review of all contracts to ensure the appropriate language exits regarding suspension and debarment regulations or the System should consider an annual review of SAM.gov for all vendors.View of Responsible Official: The Agency will implement internal controls to ensure that supporting documentation is maintained for the procurement of goods and services in accordance with ?200.320. The Agency will update our written policies and procedures to ensure that documentation is included regarding the avoidance of the acquisition of unnecessary or duplicative items. Documentation and policies will include procedures for the competitive bidding of bus parts on a quarterly basis and evidence that purchases are from these bid responses and from the lowest qualified vendor. Procurement will perform an annual review of SAM.gov for all vendors.
U.S. Department of Transportation FEDERAL TRANSIT CLUSTER 20.507 Federal Transit Formula Grant (applies to all grants) 20.526 Section 5339 Formula Apportionment 2022-005 Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Criteria: The Uniform Guidance regulations (?200.320) require, among other things, that procurement for purchases of goods and services follow certain procedures related to obtaining and awarding of contracts based on sealed bid, competitive-, and noncompetitive proposals. Additionally, ?200.318(d) provides that written policies and procedures must document the avoidance of the acquisition of unnecessary or duplicative items. In addition, non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with parties that are suspended or debarred. ?Covered transactions? include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. When a non-federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the non-federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. This verification may be accomplished by (1) checking the System for Award Management (SAM) Exclusions maintained by the General Services Administration (GSA) and available at SAM.gov, (2) collecting a certification from the entity, or (3) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that entity (2 CFR section 180.300). Condition: The portion related to procurement is a repeated finding from 2019, 2020 and 2021. During our testing of purchases under the procurement regulations, for 2 out of 10 vendors (paid approximately $1.59 million out of the amount tested of $12.8 million) selected for testing, the System was unable to provide supporting documentation that these vendor services or supplies were procured in accordance with the standards in ?200.320. The universe (population) from which the items were selected was all vendor payments in 2022 over $10,000 consisting of 154 vendors paid approximately $22 million. Additionally, while the System does maintain written policies and procedures related to procurement standards, documentation addressing the acquisition of unnecessary or duplicative items was not present.Condition: During our testing of compliance with the suspension and debarment regulations, for 2 out of 10 vendors selected for testing (same vendors selected for procurement testing above), the System was unable to provide documentation of its conclusions that these vendor were not suspended or debarred. The universe (population) from which the items were selected were all vendor payments in 2022 over $25,000 consisting of 94 vendors paid approximately $21 million. Based on a review of SAM.gov, none of these vendors were suspended or debarred. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Cause: A material weakness exists in the internal controls over procurement and suspension and debarment. The System does not have adequate controls in place to ensure that appropriate supporting documentation is maintained for purchases made under the procurement standards to support the System?s consideration and/or conclusion for obtaining and awarding of contracts based on sealed bid, competitive, and noncompetitive proposals or its determination of whether the vendor is suspended or debarred. Additionally, written policies and procedures for procurement were not reviewed to ensure all requirements under these regulations were addressed. Effect: The System may not be receiving the overall lowest cost for services and supplies procured by the agency. Without ensuring documentation is maintained over whether a vendor is suspended or debarred, the System may enter into contracts with unauthorized parties. Recommendation: We recommend the System implement internal controls to ensure that supporting documentation is maintained for the procurement of goods and services in accordance with ?200.320. Additionally, we recommend that the System enhance its written policies and procedures to ensure that documentation is included regarding the avoidance of the acquisition of unnecessary or duplicative items. Documentation and policies should include procedures for the competitive bidding of bus parts on a quarterly basis and evidence that purchases are from these bid responses and from the lowest qualified vendor. A review of all contracts to ensure the appropriate language exits regarding suspension and debarment regulations or the System should consider an annual review of SAM.gov for all vendors.View of Responsible Official: The Agency will implement internal controls to ensure that supporting documentation is maintained for the procurement of goods and services in accordance with ?200.320. The Agency will update our written policies and procedures to ensure that documentation is included regarding the avoidance of the acquisition of unnecessary or duplicative items. Documentation and policies will include procedures for the competitive bidding of bus parts on a quarterly basis and evidence that purchases are from these bid responses and from the lowest qualified vendor. Procurement will perform an annual review of SAM.gov for all vendors.
U.S. Department of Transportation FEDERAL TRANSIT CLUSTER 20.507 Federal Transit Formula Grant (applies to all grants) 20.526 Section 5339 Formula Apportionment 2022-005 Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Criteria: The Uniform Guidance regulations (?200.320) require, among other things, that procurement for purchases of goods and services follow certain procedures related to obtaining and awarding of contracts based on sealed bid, competitive-, and noncompetitive proposals. Additionally, ?200.318(d) provides that written policies and procedures must document the avoidance of the acquisition of unnecessary or duplicative items. In addition, non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with parties that are suspended or debarred. ?Covered transactions? include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. When a non-federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the non-federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. This verification may be accomplished by (1) checking the System for Award Management (SAM) Exclusions maintained by the General Services Administration (GSA) and available at SAM.gov, (2) collecting a certification from the entity, or (3) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that entity (2 CFR section 180.300). Condition: The portion related to procurement is a repeated finding from 2019, 2020 and 2021. During our testing of purchases under the procurement regulations, for 2 out of 10 vendors (paid approximately $1.59 million out of the amount tested of $12.8 million) selected for testing, the System was unable to provide supporting documentation that these vendor services or supplies were procured in accordance with the standards in ?200.320. The universe (population) from which the items were selected was all vendor payments in 2022 over $10,000 consisting of 154 vendors paid approximately $22 million. Additionally, while the System does maintain written policies and procedures related to procurement standards, documentation addressing the acquisition of unnecessary or duplicative items was not present.Condition: During our testing of compliance with the suspension and debarment regulations, for 2 out of 10 vendors selected for testing (same vendors selected for procurement testing above), the System was unable to provide documentation of its conclusions that these vendor were not suspended or debarred. The universe (population) from which the items were selected were all vendor payments in 2022 over $25,000 consisting of 94 vendors paid approximately $21 million. Based on a review of SAM.gov, none of these vendors were suspended or debarred. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Cause: A material weakness exists in the internal controls over procurement and suspension and debarment. The System does not have adequate controls in place to ensure that appropriate supporting documentation is maintained for purchases made under the procurement standards to support the System?s consideration and/or conclusion for obtaining and awarding of contracts based on sealed bid, competitive, and noncompetitive proposals or its determination of whether the vendor is suspended or debarred. Additionally, written policies and procedures for procurement were not reviewed to ensure all requirements under these regulations were addressed. Effect: The System may not be receiving the overall lowest cost for services and supplies procured by the agency. Without ensuring documentation is maintained over whether a vendor is suspended or debarred, the System may enter into contracts with unauthorized parties. Recommendation: We recommend the System implement internal controls to ensure that supporting documentation is maintained for the procurement of goods and services in accordance with ?200.320. Additionally, we recommend that the System enhance its written policies and procedures to ensure that documentation is included regarding the avoidance of the acquisition of unnecessary or duplicative items. Documentation and policies should include procedures for the competitive bidding of bus parts on a quarterly basis and evidence that purchases are from these bid responses and from the lowest qualified vendor. A review of all contracts to ensure the appropriate language exits regarding suspension and debarment regulations or the System should consider an annual review of SAM.gov for all vendors.View of Responsible Official: The Agency will implement internal controls to ensure that supporting documentation is maintained for the procurement of goods and services in accordance with ?200.320. The Agency will update our written policies and procedures to ensure that documentation is included regarding the avoidance of the acquisition of unnecessary or duplicative items. Documentation and policies will include procedures for the competitive bidding of bus parts on a quarterly basis and evidence that purchases are from these bid responses and from the lowest qualified vendor. Procurement will perform an annual review of SAM.gov for all vendors.
U.S. Department of Transportation FEDERAL TRANSIT CLUSTER 20.507 Federal Transit Formula Grant (applies to all grants) 20.526 Section 5339 Formula Apportionment 2022-005 Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Criteria: The Uniform Guidance regulations (?200.320) require, among other things, that procurement for purchases of goods and services follow certain procedures related to obtaining and awarding of contracts based on sealed bid, competitive-, and noncompetitive proposals. Additionally, ?200.318(d) provides that written policies and procedures must document the avoidance of the acquisition of unnecessary or duplicative items. In addition, non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with parties that are suspended or debarred. ?Covered transactions? include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. When a non-federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the non-federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. This verification may be accomplished by (1) checking the System for Award Management (SAM) Exclusions maintained by the General Services Administration (GSA) and available at SAM.gov, (2) collecting a certification from the entity, or (3) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that entity (2 CFR section 180.300). Condition: The portion related to procurement is a repeated finding from 2019, 2020 and 2021. During our testing of purchases under the procurement regulations, for 2 out of 10 vendors (paid approximately $1.59 million out of the amount tested of $12.8 million) selected for testing, the System was unable to provide supporting documentation that these vendor services or supplies were procured in accordance with the standards in ?200.320. The universe (population) from which the items were selected was all vendor payments in 2022 over $10,000 consisting of 154 vendors paid approximately $22 million. Additionally, while the System does maintain written policies and procedures related to procurement standards, documentation addressing the acquisition of unnecessary or duplicative items was not present.Condition: During our testing of compliance with the suspension and debarment regulations, for 2 out of 10 vendors selected for testing (same vendors selected for procurement testing above), the System was unable to provide documentation of its conclusions that these vendor were not suspended or debarred. The universe (population) from which the items were selected were all vendor payments in 2022 over $25,000 consisting of 94 vendors paid approximately $21 million. Based on a review of SAM.gov, none of these vendors were suspended or debarred. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Cause: A material weakness exists in the internal controls over procurement and suspension and debarment. The System does not have adequate controls in place to ensure that appropriate supporting documentation is maintained for purchases made under the procurement standards to support the System?s consideration and/or conclusion for obtaining and awarding of contracts based on sealed bid, competitive, and noncompetitive proposals or its determination of whether the vendor is suspended or debarred. Additionally, written policies and procedures for procurement were not reviewed to ensure all requirements under these regulations were addressed. Effect: The System may not be receiving the overall lowest cost for services and supplies procured by the agency. Without ensuring documentation is maintained over whether a vendor is suspended or debarred, the System may enter into contracts with unauthorized parties. Recommendation: We recommend the System implement internal controls to ensure that supporting documentation is maintained for the procurement of goods and services in accordance with ?200.320. Additionally, we recommend that the System enhance its written policies and procedures to ensure that documentation is included regarding the avoidance of the acquisition of unnecessary or duplicative items. Documentation and policies should include procedures for the competitive bidding of bus parts on a quarterly basis and evidence that purchases are from these bid responses and from the lowest qualified vendor. A review of all contracts to ensure the appropriate language exits regarding suspension and debarment regulations or the System should consider an annual review of SAM.gov for all vendors.View of Responsible Official: The Agency will implement internal controls to ensure that supporting documentation is maintained for the procurement of goods and services in accordance with ?200.320. The Agency will update our written policies and procedures to ensure that documentation is included regarding the avoidance of the acquisition of unnecessary or duplicative items. Documentation and policies will include procedures for the competitive bidding of bus parts on a quarterly basis and evidence that purchases are from these bid responses and from the lowest qualified vendor. Procurement will perform an annual review of SAM.gov for all vendors.
U.S. Department of Transportation FEDERAL TRANSIT CLUSTER 20.507 Federal Transit Formula Grant (applies to all grants) 20.526 Section 5339 Formula Apportionment 2022-005 Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Criteria: The Uniform Guidance regulations (?200.320) require, among other things, that procurement for purchases of goods and services follow certain procedures related to obtaining and awarding of contracts based on sealed bid, competitive-, and noncompetitive proposals. Additionally, ?200.318(d) provides that written policies and procedures must document the avoidance of the acquisition of unnecessary or duplicative items. In addition, non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with parties that are suspended or debarred. ?Covered transactions? include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. When a non-federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the non-federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. This verification may be accomplished by (1) checking the System for Award Management (SAM) Exclusions maintained by the General Services Administration (GSA) and available at SAM.gov, (2) collecting a certification from the entity, or (3) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that entity (2 CFR section 180.300). Condition: The portion related to procurement is a repeated finding from 2019, 2020 and 2021. During our testing of purchases under the procurement regulations, for 2 out of 10 vendors (paid approximately $1.59 million out of the amount tested of $12.8 million) selected for testing, the System was unable to provide supporting documentation that these vendor services or supplies were procured in accordance with the standards in ?200.320. The universe (population) from which the items were selected was all vendor payments in 2022 over $10,000 consisting of 154 vendors paid approximately $22 million. Additionally, while the System does maintain written policies and procedures related to procurement standards, documentation addressing the acquisition of unnecessary or duplicative items was not present.Condition: During our testing of compliance with the suspension and debarment regulations, for 2 out of 10 vendors selected for testing (same vendors selected for procurement testing above), the System was unable to provide documentation of its conclusions that these vendor were not suspended or debarred. The universe (population) from which the items were selected were all vendor payments in 2022 over $25,000 consisting of 94 vendors paid approximately $21 million. Based on a review of SAM.gov, none of these vendors were suspended or debarred. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Cause: A material weakness exists in the internal controls over procurement and suspension and debarment. The System does not have adequate controls in place to ensure that appropriate supporting documentation is maintained for purchases made under the procurement standards to support the System?s consideration and/or conclusion for obtaining and awarding of contracts based on sealed bid, competitive, and noncompetitive proposals or its determination of whether the vendor is suspended or debarred. Additionally, written policies and procedures for procurement were not reviewed to ensure all requirements under these regulations were addressed. Effect: The System may not be receiving the overall lowest cost for services and supplies procured by the agency. Without ensuring documentation is maintained over whether a vendor is suspended or debarred, the System may enter into contracts with unauthorized parties. Recommendation: We recommend the System implement internal controls to ensure that supporting documentation is maintained for the procurement of goods and services in accordance with ?200.320. Additionally, we recommend that the System enhance its written policies and procedures to ensure that documentation is included regarding the avoidance of the acquisition of unnecessary or duplicative items. Documentation and policies should include procedures for the competitive bidding of bus parts on a quarterly basis and evidence that purchases are from these bid responses and from the lowest qualified vendor. A review of all contracts to ensure the appropriate language exits regarding suspension and debarment regulations or the System should consider an annual review of SAM.gov for all vendors.View of Responsible Official: The Agency will implement internal controls to ensure that supporting documentation is maintained for the procurement of goods and services in accordance with ?200.320. The Agency will update our written policies and procedures to ensure that documentation is included regarding the avoidance of the acquisition of unnecessary or duplicative items. Documentation and policies will include procedures for the competitive bidding of bus parts on a quarterly basis and evidence that purchases are from these bid responses and from the lowest qualified vendor. Procurement will perform an annual review of SAM.gov for all vendors.
U.S. Department of Transportation FEDERAL TRANSIT CLUSTER 20.507 Federal Transit Formula Grant (applies to all grants) 20.526 Section 5339 Formula Apportionment 2022-005 Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Criteria: The Uniform Guidance regulations (?200.320) require, among other things, that procurement for purchases of goods and services follow certain procedures related to obtaining and awarding of contracts based on sealed bid, competitive-, and noncompetitive proposals. Additionally, ?200.318(d) provides that written policies and procedures must document the avoidance of the acquisition of unnecessary or duplicative items. In addition, non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with parties that are suspended or debarred. ?Covered transactions? include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. When a non-federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the non-federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. This verification may be accomplished by (1) checking the System for Award Management (SAM) Exclusions maintained by the General Services Administration (GSA) and available at SAM.gov, (2) collecting a certification from the entity, or (3) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that entity (2 CFR section 180.300). Condition: The portion related to procurement is a repeated finding from 2019, 2020 and 2021. During our testing of purchases under the procurement regulations, for 2 out of 10 vendors (paid approximately $1.59 million out of the amount tested of $12.8 million) selected for testing, the System was unable to provide supporting documentation that these vendor services or supplies were procured in accordance with the standards in ?200.320. The universe (population) from which the items were selected was all vendor payments in 2022 over $10,000 consisting of 154 vendors paid approximately $22 million. Additionally, while the System does maintain written policies and procedures related to procurement standards, documentation addressing the acquisition of unnecessary or duplicative items was not present.Condition: During our testing of compliance with the suspension and debarment regulations, for 2 out of 10 vendors selected for testing (same vendors selected for procurement testing above), the System was unable to provide documentation of its conclusions that these vendor were not suspended or debarred. The universe (population) from which the items were selected were all vendor payments in 2022 over $25,000 consisting of 94 vendors paid approximately $21 million. Based on a review of SAM.gov, none of these vendors were suspended or debarred. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Cause: A material weakness exists in the internal controls over procurement and suspension and debarment. The System does not have adequate controls in place to ensure that appropriate supporting documentation is maintained for purchases made under the procurement standards to support the System?s consideration and/or conclusion for obtaining and awarding of contracts based on sealed bid, competitive, and noncompetitive proposals or its determination of whether the vendor is suspended or debarred. Additionally, written policies and procedures for procurement were not reviewed to ensure all requirements under these regulations were addressed. Effect: The System may not be receiving the overall lowest cost for services and supplies procured by the agency. Without ensuring documentation is maintained over whether a vendor is suspended or debarred, the System may enter into contracts with unauthorized parties. Recommendation: We recommend the System implement internal controls to ensure that supporting documentation is maintained for the procurement of goods and services in accordance with ?200.320. Additionally, we recommend that the System enhance its written policies and procedures to ensure that documentation is included regarding the avoidance of the acquisition of unnecessary or duplicative items. Documentation and policies should include procedures for the competitive bidding of bus parts on a quarterly basis and evidence that purchases are from these bid responses and from the lowest qualified vendor. A review of all contracts to ensure the appropriate language exits regarding suspension and debarment regulations or the System should consider an annual review of SAM.gov for all vendors.View of Responsible Official: The Agency will implement internal controls to ensure that supporting documentation is maintained for the procurement of goods and services in accordance with ?200.320. The Agency will update our written policies and procedures to ensure that documentation is included regarding the avoidance of the acquisition of unnecessary or duplicative items. Documentation and policies will include procedures for the competitive bidding of bus parts on a quarterly basis and evidence that purchases are from these bid responses and from the lowest qualified vendor. Procurement will perform an annual review of SAM.gov for all vendors.
U.S. Department of Transportation FEDERAL TRANSIT CLUSTER 20.507 Federal Transit Formula Grant (applies to all grants) 20.526 Section 5339 Formula Apportionment 2022-005 Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Criteria: The Uniform Guidance regulations (?200.320) require, among other things, that procurement for purchases of goods and services follow certain procedures related to obtaining and awarding of contracts based on sealed bid, competitive-, and noncompetitive proposals. Additionally, ?200.318(d) provides that written policies and procedures must document the avoidance of the acquisition of unnecessary or duplicative items. In addition, non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with parties that are suspended or debarred. ?Covered transactions? include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. When a non-federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the non-federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. This verification may be accomplished by (1) checking the System for Award Management (SAM) Exclusions maintained by the General Services Administration (GSA) and available at SAM.gov, (2) collecting a certification from the entity, or (3) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that entity (2 CFR section 180.300). Condition: The portion related to procurement is a repeated finding from 2019, 2020 and 2021. During our testing of purchases under the procurement regulations, for 2 out of 10 vendors (paid approximately $1.59 million out of the amount tested of $12.8 million) selected for testing, the System was unable to provide supporting documentation that these vendor services or supplies were procured in accordance with the standards in ?200.320. The universe (population) from which the items were selected was all vendor payments in 2022 over $10,000 consisting of 154 vendors paid approximately $22 million. Additionally, while the System does maintain written policies and procedures related to procurement standards, documentation addressing the acquisition of unnecessary or duplicative items was not present.Condition: During our testing of compliance with the suspension and debarment regulations, for 2 out of 10 vendors selected for testing (same vendors selected for procurement testing above), the System was unable to provide documentation of its conclusions that these vendor were not suspended or debarred. The universe (population) from which the items were selected were all vendor payments in 2022 over $25,000 consisting of 94 vendors paid approximately $21 million. Based on a review of SAM.gov, none of these vendors were suspended or debarred. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Cause: A material weakness exists in the internal controls over procurement and suspension and debarment. The System does not have adequate controls in place to ensure that appropriate supporting documentation is maintained for purchases made under the procurement standards to support the System?s consideration and/or conclusion for obtaining and awarding of contracts based on sealed bid, competitive, and noncompetitive proposals or its determination of whether the vendor is suspended or debarred. Additionally, written policies and procedures for procurement were not reviewed to ensure all requirements under these regulations were addressed. Effect: The System may not be receiving the overall lowest cost for services and supplies procured by the agency. Without ensuring documentation is maintained over whether a vendor is suspended or debarred, the System may enter into contracts with unauthorized parties. Recommendation: We recommend the System implement internal controls to ensure that supporting documentation is maintained for the procurement of goods and services in accordance with ?200.320. Additionally, we recommend that the System enhance its written policies and procedures to ensure that documentation is included regarding the avoidance of the acquisition of unnecessary or duplicative items. Documentation and policies should include procedures for the competitive bidding of bus parts on a quarterly basis and evidence that purchases are from these bid responses and from the lowest qualified vendor. A review of all contracts to ensure the appropriate language exits regarding suspension and debarment regulations or the System should consider an annual review of SAM.gov for all vendors.View of Responsible Official: The Agency will implement internal controls to ensure that supporting documentation is maintained for the procurement of goods and services in accordance with ?200.320. The Agency will update our written policies and procedures to ensure that documentation is included regarding the avoidance of the acquisition of unnecessary or duplicative items. Documentation and policies will include procedures for the competitive bidding of bus parts on a quarterly basis and evidence that purchases are from these bid responses and from the lowest qualified vendor. Procurement will perform an annual review of SAM.gov for all vendors.
U.S. Department of Transportation FEDERAL TRANSIT CLUSTER 20.507 Federal Transit Formula Grant (applies to all grants) 20.526 Section 5339 Formula Apportionment 2022-005 Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Criteria: The Uniform Guidance regulations (?200.320) require, among other things, that procurement for purchases of goods and services follow certain procedures related to obtaining and awarding of contracts based on sealed bid, competitive-, and noncompetitive proposals. Additionally, ?200.318(d) provides that written policies and procedures must document the avoidance of the acquisition of unnecessary or duplicative items. In addition, non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with parties that are suspended or debarred. ?Covered transactions? include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. When a non-federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the non-federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. This verification may be accomplished by (1) checking the System for Award Management (SAM) Exclusions maintained by the General Services Administration (GSA) and available at SAM.gov, (2) collecting a certification from the entity, or (3) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that entity (2 CFR section 180.300). Condition: The portion related to procurement is a repeated finding from 2019, 2020 and 2021. During our testing of purchases under the procurement regulations, for 2 out of 10 vendors (paid approximately $1.59 million out of the amount tested of $12.8 million) selected for testing, the System was unable to provide supporting documentation that these vendor services or supplies were procured in accordance with the standards in ?200.320. The universe (population) from which the items were selected was all vendor payments in 2022 over $10,000 consisting of 154 vendors paid approximately $22 million. Additionally, while the System does maintain written policies and procedures related to procurement standards, documentation addressing the acquisition of unnecessary or duplicative items was not present.Condition: During our testing of compliance with the suspension and debarment regulations, for 2 out of 10 vendors selected for testing (same vendors selected for procurement testing above), the System was unable to provide documentation of its conclusions that these vendor were not suspended or debarred. The universe (population) from which the items were selected were all vendor payments in 2022 over $25,000 consisting of 94 vendors paid approximately $21 million. Based on a review of SAM.gov, none of these vendors were suspended or debarred. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Cause: A material weakness exists in the internal controls over procurement and suspension and debarment. The System does not have adequate controls in place to ensure that appropriate supporting documentation is maintained for purchases made under the procurement standards to support the System?s consideration and/or conclusion for obtaining and awarding of contracts based on sealed bid, competitive, and noncompetitive proposals or its determination of whether the vendor is suspended or debarred. Additionally, written policies and procedures for procurement were not reviewed to ensure all requirements under these regulations were addressed. Effect: The System may not be receiving the overall lowest cost for services and supplies procured by the agency. Without ensuring documentation is maintained over whether a vendor is suspended or debarred, the System may enter into contracts with unauthorized parties. Recommendation: We recommend the System implement internal controls to ensure that supporting documentation is maintained for the procurement of goods and services in accordance with ?200.320. Additionally, we recommend that the System enhance its written policies and procedures to ensure that documentation is included regarding the avoidance of the acquisition of unnecessary or duplicative items. Documentation and policies should include procedures for the competitive bidding of bus parts on a quarterly basis and evidence that purchases are from these bid responses and from the lowest qualified vendor. A review of all contracts to ensure the appropriate language exits regarding suspension and debarment regulations or the System should consider an annual review of SAM.gov for all vendors.View of Responsible Official: The Agency will implement internal controls to ensure that supporting documentation is maintained for the procurement of goods and services in accordance with ?200.320. The Agency will update our written policies and procedures to ensure that documentation is included regarding the avoidance of the acquisition of unnecessary or duplicative items. Documentation and policies will include procedures for the competitive bidding of bus parts on a quarterly basis and evidence that purchases are from these bid responses and from the lowest qualified vendor. Procurement will perform an annual review of SAM.gov for all vendors.
U.S. Department of Transportation FEDERAL TRANSIT CLUSTER 20.507 Federal Transit Formula Grant (applies to all grants) 20.526 Section 5339 Formula Apportionment 2022-005 Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Criteria: The Uniform Guidance regulations (?200.320) require, among other things, that procurement for purchases of goods and services follow certain procedures related to obtaining and awarding of contracts based on sealed bid, competitive-, and noncompetitive proposals. Additionally, ?200.318(d) provides that written policies and procedures must document the avoidance of the acquisition of unnecessary or duplicative items. In addition, non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with parties that are suspended or debarred. ?Covered transactions? include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. When a non-federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the non-federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. This verification may be accomplished by (1) checking the System for Award Management (SAM) Exclusions maintained by the General Services Administration (GSA) and available at SAM.gov, (2) collecting a certification from the entity, or (3) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that entity (2 CFR section 180.300). Condition: The portion related to procurement is a repeated finding from 2019, 2020 and 2021. During our testing of purchases under the procurement regulations, for 2 out of 10 vendors (paid approximately $1.59 million out of the amount tested of $12.8 million) selected for testing, the System was unable to provide supporting documentation that these vendor services or supplies were procured in accordance with the standards in ?200.320. The universe (population) from which the items were selected was all vendor payments in 2022 over $10,000 consisting of 154 vendors paid approximately $22 million. Additionally, while the System does maintain written policies and procedures related to procurement standards, documentation addressing the acquisition of unnecessary or duplicative items was not present.Condition: During our testing of compliance with the suspension and debarment regulations, for 2 out of 10 vendors selected for testing (same vendors selected for procurement testing above), the System was unable to provide documentation of its conclusions that these vendor were not suspended or debarred. The universe (population) from which the items were selected were all vendor payments in 2022 over $25,000 consisting of 94 vendors paid approximately $21 million. Based on a review of SAM.gov, none of these vendors were suspended or debarred. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Cause: A material weakness exists in the internal controls over procurement and suspension and debarment. The System does not have adequate controls in place to ensure that appropriate supporting documentation is maintained for purchases made under the procurement standards to support the System?s consideration and/or conclusion for obtaining and awarding of contracts based on sealed bid, competitive, and noncompetitive proposals or its determination of whether the vendor is suspended or debarred. Additionally, written policies and procedures for procurement were not reviewed to ensure all requirements under these regulations were addressed. Effect: The System may not be receiving the overall lowest cost for services and supplies procured by the agency. Without ensuring documentation is maintained over whether a vendor is suspended or debarred, the System may enter into contracts with unauthorized parties. Recommendation: We recommend the System implement internal controls to ensure that supporting documentation is maintained for the procurement of goods and services in accordance with ?200.320. Additionally, we recommend that the System enhance its written policies and procedures to ensure that documentation is included regarding the avoidance of the acquisition of unnecessary or duplicative items. Documentation and policies should include procedures for the competitive bidding of bus parts on a quarterly basis and evidence that purchases are from these bid responses and from the lowest qualified vendor. A review of all contracts to ensure the appropriate language exits regarding suspension and debarment regulations or the System should consider an annual review of SAM.gov for all vendors.View of Responsible Official: The Agency will implement internal controls to ensure that supporting documentation is maintained for the procurement of goods and services in accordance with ?200.320. The Agency will update our written policies and procedures to ensure that documentation is included regarding the avoidance of the acquisition of unnecessary or duplicative items. Documentation and policies will include procedures for the competitive bidding of bus parts on a quarterly basis and evidence that purchases are from these bid responses and from the lowest qualified vendor. Procurement will perform an annual review of SAM.gov for all vendors.
2022-002 Procurement Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program Name: COVID-19 Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases (ELC) Assistance Listing Number: 93.323 Pass-Through Agency: Wisconsin Department of Health Services Pass-Through Number: 155802 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: NU50CK000534 and 2020 Award Period: October 1, 2020 ? October 31, 2022 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Material Noncompliance Criteria or Specific Requirement: 2 CFR 200 requires that all procurement transactions for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award must be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition consistent with the standards of this section and ?200.320. The nonFederal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Further, the method of procurement, whether informal or formal, must follow the County's written procurement policy on approval thresholds and controls. Condition: The County did not follow their established controls related to ensuring procurement policies were followed. Questioned Costs: $231,169 Context: While performing compliance procedures, it was noted that the County did not follow their policy to ensure compliance with procurement requirements. Cause: The Human Services department at the County does not have established procedures to verify procurement policies are followed prior to entering into a procurement transaction with a vendor in which federal funds are going to be used. Effect: The County is not in compliance with procurement requirements. Contracts for construction, nonconstruction related procurements, and those over the simplified acquisition threshold may not be in compliance with the Uniform Guidance. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the County review and update procurement policies for the entire County to ensure it meets the minimum requirements of 2 CFR 200 for all federal grants and establish a procurement process in order to ensure this policy is followed. View of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the finding.
FINDING 2022-003 Subject: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Federal Program: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listings Number: 21.027 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): CY 2022, SWIF220329 Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context The Town received a total State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF) allocation of $140,378 directly from the U.S. Department of the Treasury (Treasury). During the audit period, the Town expended these funds out of the revenue loss use category. The Treasury has decided that only some of the provisions in the Uniform Guidance apply to the revenue loss use category, as such, the provisions related to procurement, per the Treasury, are not applicable to the revenue loss use category. Therefore, the Town's use of its SLFRF funds received directly from the Treasury are not subject to procurement testing. In addition, the Town received an SLFRF allocation of $800,000 from the Indiana Finance Authority through the State Water Infrastructure or Transportation (SWIF) grant program. These funds are subject to the procurement provisions as outlined in the Uniform Guidance. The suspension and debarment provisions apply to all SLFRF funds regardless of use category or who (Treasury or other entity) awarded the funds. Procurement - Policy (SWIF award) Non-federal entities must follow procurement standards set out in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) in addition to its own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements idented in 2 CFR Part 200. The Town did not have its own documented procurement procedures or policies that reflected applicable state laws and regulations or federal statutes for procuring goods and services paid with federal funds. Procurement - Simplified Acquisition (SWIF award) When the value of the procurement for property or services exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), or a lower threshold established by a non-federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. The SAT is typically set at $250,000; however, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold, and, therefore, the SAT is set at $150,000. Formal procurement methods require adherence to documented procedures and formal methods such as sealed bids or proposals. Two vendors were identified that fell within the SAT. Both vendors were selected for testing. One of the vendors, paid with SWIF funds, was originally contracted for $84,840, which is below the simplified acquisition threshold. At that time, the Town obtained quotes as would have been required at the small purchase threshold. However, the Town elected to change the scope of the project once SLFRF funds were awarded to cover additional improvements. As the scope of the project changed and the total price increased to over $429,000, more than 20 percent above of the original contract price, the project should have been reviewed and bid out. Since the new total of the project was over the SAT and formal procurement methods were not adhered to, this vendor was not properly procured. Suspension and Debarment (Treasury award) Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with federal award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contracts and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the Excluded Parties List System (EPLS), collecting a certification from that person, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. Due to the Treasury's determination that the revenue loss eligible use category does not give rise to subawards, the Town was only required to comply with suspension and debarment requirements related to covered transactions. Upon inquiry of the Town to determine its policies and procedures related to suspension and debarment requirements for the money received directly from the Treasury, the Town stated procedures had not been performed to ensure vendors were not suspended or debarred prior to entering into covered transactions. Two covered transactions for goods or services that equaled or exceeded $25,000 paid from the direct SLFRF funds during the audit period were identified. Both transactions were examined to determine whether the Town verified the suspension and debarment status of the vendors prior to payment. The Town had not performed procedures to ensure the two vendors were not suspended or debarred, or otherwise excluded or disqualified from participating in federal assistance programs or activities for suspension or debarment. The lack of internal controls was a systemic issue throughout the audit period. The noncompliance for procurement was isolated to the SLFRF SWIF funding, and the noncompliance for suspension and debarment was isolated to the SLFRF direct funding. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(a) states: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non- Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in ?? 200.317 through 200.327." 2 CFR 200.320(b) states in part: "Formal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under the Federal financial assistance award exceeds the SAT, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require following documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a non-competitive procurement can be used in accordance with ? 200.319 or paragraph (c) of this section. The following formal methods of procurement are used for procurement of property or services above the simplified acquisition threshold or a value below the simplified acquisition threshold the non-Federal entity determines to be appropriate: (1) Sealed bids. . . . (ii) If sealed bids are used the following requirements apply: (A) Bids must be solicited from an adequate number of qualified sources . . . (2) Proposals. . . . (i) Requests for proposals must be publicized and identify all evaluation factors and their relative importance. Proposals must be solicited from an adequate number qualified offerors. . . ." 2 CFR 200.320(c) states: "Noncompetitive procurement. There are specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. Noncompetitive procurement can only be awarded if one or more of the following circumstances apply: (1) The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold (see paragraph (a)(1) of this section); (2) The items is available only from a single source; (3) The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from publicizing a competitive solicitation; (4) The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity expressly authorizes a noncompetitive procurement in response to a written request from the non-Federal entity; or (5) After solicitation of a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate." Indiana Code 5-22-10-9 states: "A purchasing agent may make a special purchase when purchase of the required supplies or services under another purchasing method under this article would seriously impair the functioning of the using agency." 31 CFR 19.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the EPLS; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person if allowed by this rule; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed or implemented, which includes segregation of key functions, by management of the Town to ensure that policies and procedures were in place related to procurement and suspension and debarment. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the Town's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, vendors to whom payments equal to or in excess of $25,000 were not verified to be not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded and contracts exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold were not properly bid. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions or the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the Town. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the Town establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure proper procurement procedures are followed and that contractors and subrecipients, as appropriate, are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded prior to entering into any contracts or subawards. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-003 Subject: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Federal Program: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listings Number: 21.027 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): CY 2022, SWIF220329 Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context The Town received a total State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF) allocation of $140,378 directly from the U.S. Department of the Treasury (Treasury). During the audit period, the Town expended these funds out of the revenue loss use category. The Treasury has decided that only some of the provisions in the Uniform Guidance apply to the revenue loss use category, as such, the provisions related to procurement, per the Treasury, are not applicable to the revenue loss use category. Therefore, the Town's use of its SLFRF funds received directly from the Treasury are not subject to procurement testing. In addition, the Town received an SLFRF allocation of $800,000 from the Indiana Finance Authority through the State Water Infrastructure or Transportation (SWIF) grant program. These funds are subject to the procurement provisions as outlined in the Uniform Guidance. The suspension and debarment provisions apply to all SLFRF funds regardless of use category or who (Treasury or other entity) awarded the funds. Procurement - Policy (SWIF award) Non-federal entities must follow procurement standards set out in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) in addition to its own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements idented in 2 CFR Part 200. The Town did not have its own documented procurement procedures or policies that reflected applicable state laws and regulations or federal statutes for procuring goods and services paid with federal funds. Procurement - Simplified Acquisition (SWIF award) When the value of the procurement for property or services exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), or a lower threshold established by a non-federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. The SAT is typically set at $250,000; however, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold, and, therefore, the SAT is set at $150,000. Formal procurement methods require adherence to documented procedures and formal methods such as sealed bids or proposals. Two vendors were identified that fell within the SAT. Both vendors were selected for testing. One of the vendors, paid with SWIF funds, was originally contracted for $84,840, which is below the simplified acquisition threshold. At that time, the Town obtained quotes as would have been required at the small purchase threshold. However, the Town elected to change the scope of the project once SLFRF funds were awarded to cover additional improvements. As the scope of the project changed and the total price increased to over $429,000, more than 20 percent above of the original contract price, the project should have been reviewed and bid out. Since the new total of the project was over the SAT and formal procurement methods were not adhered to, this vendor was not properly procured. Suspension and Debarment (Treasury award) Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with federal award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contracts and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the Excluded Parties List System (EPLS), collecting a certification from that person, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. Due to the Treasury's determination that the revenue loss eligible use category does not give rise to subawards, the Town was only required to comply with suspension and debarment requirements related to covered transactions. Upon inquiry of the Town to determine its policies and procedures related to suspension and debarment requirements for the money received directly from the Treasury, the Town stated procedures had not been performed to ensure vendors were not suspended or debarred prior to entering into covered transactions. Two covered transactions for goods or services that equaled or exceeded $25,000 paid from the direct SLFRF funds during the audit period were identified. Both transactions were examined to determine whether the Town verified the suspension and debarment status of the vendors prior to payment. The Town had not performed procedures to ensure the two vendors were not suspended or debarred, or otherwise excluded or disqualified from participating in federal assistance programs or activities for suspension or debarment. The lack of internal controls was a systemic issue throughout the audit period. The noncompliance for procurement was isolated to the SLFRF SWIF funding, and the noncompliance for suspension and debarment was isolated to the SLFRF direct funding. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(a) states: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non- Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in ?? 200.317 through 200.327." 2 CFR 200.320(b) states in part: "Formal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under the Federal financial assistance award exceeds the SAT, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require following documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a non-competitive procurement can be used in accordance with ? 200.319 or paragraph (c) of this section. The following formal methods of procurement are used for procurement of property or services above the simplified acquisition threshold or a value below the simplified acquisition threshold the non-Federal entity determines to be appropriate: (1) Sealed bids. . . . (ii) If sealed bids are used the following requirements apply: (A) Bids must be solicited from an adequate number of qualified sources . . . (2) Proposals. . . . (i) Requests for proposals must be publicized and identify all evaluation factors and their relative importance. Proposals must be solicited from an adequate number qualified offerors. . . ." 2 CFR 200.320(c) states: "Noncompetitive procurement. There are specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. Noncompetitive procurement can only be awarded if one or more of the following circumstances apply: (1) The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold (see paragraph (a)(1) of this section); (2) The items is available only from a single source; (3) The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from publicizing a competitive solicitation; (4) The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity expressly authorizes a noncompetitive procurement in response to a written request from the non-Federal entity; or (5) After solicitation of a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate." Indiana Code 5-22-10-9 states: "A purchasing agent may make a special purchase when purchase of the required supplies or services under another purchasing method under this article would seriously impair the functioning of the using agency." 31 CFR 19.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the EPLS; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person if allowed by this rule; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed or implemented, which includes segregation of key functions, by management of the Town to ensure that policies and procedures were in place related to procurement and suspension and debarment. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the Town's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, vendors to whom payments equal to or in excess of $25,000 were not verified to be not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded and contracts exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold were not properly bid. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions or the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the Town. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the Town establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure proper procurement procedures are followed and that contractors and subrecipients, as appropriate, are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded prior to entering into any contracts or subawards. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
2022-001 ? Procurement Suspension & Debarment Program: AL# 97.024 ? Emergency Food and Shelter National Board Program Sponsor Award Number: Phase 39; ARPAR Sponsor Agency: U.S. Department of Homeland Security Criteria: Non-federal entities that are operating federal programs must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. This includes utilizing appropriate procurement methods and following requirements for each method selected. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources (2 CFR section 200.320(b)). Citation: 2 CFR section 200.320(b) Condition: The Organization did not obtain price or rate quotes from an adequate number of qualified sources. Cause: Although the Organization?s procurement policies and procedures are updated to comply with the Uniform Guidance, they were not consistently followed. Effect: Failure to obtain price or quotes from an adequate number of qualified sources may result in ineffective use of government funds. Questioned Costs: None. Context: During our testing of the Organization?s procurement requirements, we noted a lack of documentation supporting the Organization?s review of an adequate number of qualified sources before the procurement decision was made. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization implement monitoring procedures to ensure internally established procurement policies are followed. Documentation should include the rationale for the method of procurement used, the basis for contractor selection, and the basis for the contract price. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan.
2022-001 ? Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Finding Type. Immaterial Noncompliance; Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls over Compliance. Federal program(s) U.S. Department of Treasury ? Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CFDA# 21.027) Criteria. A recipient of federal awards is required to determine that vendors being paid with federal funds are not suspended or debarred from doing business with the government. Such procedures are required whenever the amount disbursed to a single vendor in a given fiscal year is expected to be at least $25,000. Also, recipients of federal awards are required to ensure that federal procurement standards are followed for any purchases over the federal micropurchase threshold. 2 CFR 200.320 requires that these purchases must adhere to one of the allowable procurement methods (sealed bids, competitive proposals, noncompetitive procurement) and maintain documentation of this procurement decision. Condition. The County charged costs for multiple vendors to federal grants that they determined fell under noncompetitive procurement in accordance with 2 CFR 200.320. However, documentation was not obtained to support such determinations. Cause. This condition is a result of the County not properly documenting procurement methodology. Effect. As a result of this condition, several vendors paid with federal funding appeared to be procured in a manner not in accordance with federal regulations. Questioned Costs. No costs were questioned as a result of this finding. Recommendation. We recommend that the County implement a policy to address noncompetitive procurement circumstances. View of Responsible Officials. The County agrees that a policy needs to be implemented to address noncompetitive procurement circumstances. Responsible Officials. Finance Director Estimated Completion Date. December 31, 2023
2022-003: Procurement/Full and open competition Cluster Name: Research and development Award Name: 2019 Fire Prevention and Safety (FP&S) Assistance Listing Number: 97.044 Award Number: EMW-2019-FP-00770 Agency: Department of Homeland Security Award Year: 2019 Criteria: Underwriters Laboratories Inc. has a policy whereby purchases shall comply with Uniform Guidance for Grants and Cooperative agreements, as established in 2 CFR 200.320 Methods of Procurement and they have adopted $10,000 as their micro-purchase threshold. 2 CFR 200.318 requires that documentation of the history of the procurement, the procurement method and rationale for the method selected, selection of contract type, basis for contractor selection, and basis for the contract price to be included in the procurement file. Condition: There were two transactions over the $10,000 threshold and both were selected for testing. For one transaction in August 2022 totaling $69,239 out of the two transactions tested totaling $123,408, excluding transactions with subrecipients, management provided us with the Underwriters Laboratories, Inc. Vendor Selection Form noting multiple vendors were identified for the project at hand. However, management received two responses (one being a decline of services), of four vendors identified, and did not provide rationale for why the selected vendor was sufficient (both from a capabilities and cost side) within the Vendor Selection Form section ?Why did you choose the selected vendor?? prior to the purchase being made. Note, as of September 2022 a corrective action plan around procurement/full and open competition was created by management related to finding 2021-002 from FY21. As such, this had not been implemented at the time of vendor selection in August 2022. There were no exceptions noted for the other selection. Cause: At this point in time (August 2022) there was no formal review to ensure all federal documentation requirements related to purchases above the micro-purchase threshold had been included in the procurement files (i.e., Vendor Selection Form). Effect: The lack of a formal process for review of the Vendor Selection Form could result in inadequate bids and competition. Questioned Costs: There are no questioned costs associated with this finding. Recommendation: We recommend Underwriters Laboratories Inc. formalize the documentation and review required for procurements over the micro-purchase threshold, including instances where requests for bids from multiple vendors are not received to ensure the vendor selection process is adequately communicated prior to the purchase being made. Management?s View and Corrective Action Plan: Management?s views and corrective action plan are included at the end of this report after the summary of status of prior audit finding.
2022 ? 002 Federal agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal program title: Health Centers Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 93.224/93.527 Award Period: Varying project and budget periods: 1/1/21 ? 12/31/21, 4/1/20 ? 3/31/21, 5/1/20 ? 4/30/21, 3/15/20 ? 3/14/21, 4/1/21 ? 3/31/23 Type of Finding: ? Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria or specific requirement: The Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) section 200.320 states the non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures following specific requirements for different methods of procurement depending on size and type of purchase. Thresholds for these categories (micro-purchase, simplified acquisition threshold) refer to using the Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR), unless a different threshold has been specifically approved. Specifically, under FAR multiple quotes are generally required for purchases over the micro-purchase threshold, or documentation should be maintained explaining why multiple quotes were not obtained. CFR 200.318 also states specific requirements for conflict of interest policies and procedures non-federal entities must maintain, including specifically addressing conflicts related to contracts supported by federal awards. Condition: During our testing, we noted the Health Center did not have properly documented procurement policy that met the federal requirements. In addition, there were specific transactions tested in our sample that were above the micro-purchase threshold, but multiple quotes were not obtained, and documentation was not available or appropriate to support why noncompetitive procurement was followed. We also noted the Health Center's conflict of interest policy did not meet all the requirements under Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs: None Context: During our testing, it was noted that the Health Center had documented procurement procedures, which described individuals and parties responsible throughout the procurement process; however, it did not contain all of the necessary elements, as required by federal regulations. Based on our testing, the Health Center followed the policy in place, but the micro purchase threshold requiring multiple quotes or documentation of sole source procurement under the policy is set at $50,000, where the requirement is $10,000 unless specific steps have been taken to certify a higher threshold. Similarly, the Health Center has a conflict of interest policy and procedures in place, but the language does not meet the specific requirements of Uniform Guidance. Noted both policies to be updated to be in compliance with Uniform Guidance compliance near year-end in response to the prior year audit finding, but due to the timing policies in place for majority of year were not in compliance. Cause: The Health Center had not yet updated their procurement and conflict of interest policies to meet Uniform Guidance requirements. Effect: Without updates to procurement and conflict of interest policies over these compliance requirements the Health Center is not fully compliant with Uniform Guidance requirements. Repeat finding: The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number 2021-002 was a significant deficiency. Recommendation: We recommend the Health Center update the procurement and conflict of interest policies to meet Uniform Guidance requirements, and ensure proper documentation is retained for transactions, particularly in cases where single source procurement is utilized over the micro purchase threshold. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Policies were updated near the end of 2022 to be in compliance with requirements.
2022 ? 002 Federal agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal program title: Health Centers Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 93.224/93.527 Award Period: Varying project and budget periods: 1/1/21 ? 12/31/21, 4/1/20 ? 3/31/21, 5/1/20 ? 4/30/21, 3/15/20 ? 3/14/21, 4/1/21 ? 3/31/23 Type of Finding: ? Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria or specific requirement: The Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) section 200.320 states the non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures following specific requirements for different methods of procurement depending on size and type of purchase. Thresholds for these categories (micro-purchase, simplified acquisition threshold) refer to using the Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR), unless a different threshold has been specifically approved. Specifically, under FAR multiple quotes are generally required for purchases over the micro-purchase threshold, or documentation should be maintained explaining why multiple quotes were not obtained. CFR 200.318 also states specific requirements for conflict of interest policies and procedures non-federal entities must maintain, including specifically addressing conflicts related to contracts supported by federal awards. Condition: During our testing, we noted the Health Center did not have properly documented procurement policy that met the federal requirements. In addition, there were specific transactions tested in our sample that were above the micro-purchase threshold, but multiple quotes were not obtained, and documentation was not available or appropriate to support why noncompetitive procurement was followed. We also noted the Health Center's conflict of interest policy did not meet all the requirements under Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs: None Context: During our testing, it was noted that the Health Center had documented procurement procedures, which described individuals and parties responsible throughout the procurement process; however, it did not contain all of the necessary elements, as required by federal regulations. Based on our testing, the Health Center followed the policy in place, but the micro purchase threshold requiring multiple quotes or documentation of sole source procurement under the policy is set at $50,000, where the requirement is $10,000 unless specific steps have been taken to certify a higher threshold. Similarly, the Health Center has a conflict of interest policy and procedures in place, but the language does not meet the specific requirements of Uniform Guidance. Noted both policies to be updated to be in compliance with Uniform Guidance compliance near year-end in response to the prior year audit finding, but due to the timing policies in place for majority of year were not in compliance. Cause: The Health Center had not yet updated their procurement and conflict of interest policies to meet Uniform Guidance requirements. Effect: Without updates to procurement and conflict of interest policies over these compliance requirements the Health Center is not fully compliant with Uniform Guidance requirements. Repeat finding: The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number 2021-002 was a significant deficiency. Recommendation: We recommend the Health Center update the procurement and conflict of interest policies to meet Uniform Guidance requirements, and ensure proper documentation is retained for transactions, particularly in cases where single source procurement is utilized over the micro purchase threshold. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Policies were updated near the end of 2022 to be in compliance with requirements.
2022 ? 002 Federal agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal program title: Health Centers Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 93.224/93.527 Award Period: Varying project and budget periods: 1/1/21 ? 12/31/21, 4/1/20 ? 3/31/21, 5/1/20 ? 4/30/21, 3/15/20 ? 3/14/21, 4/1/21 ? 3/31/23 Type of Finding: ? Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria or specific requirement: The Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) section 200.320 states the non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures following specific requirements for different methods of procurement depending on size and type of purchase. Thresholds for these categories (micro-purchase, simplified acquisition threshold) refer to using the Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR), unless a different threshold has been specifically approved. Specifically, under FAR multiple quotes are generally required for purchases over the micro-purchase threshold, or documentation should be maintained explaining why multiple quotes were not obtained. CFR 200.318 also states specific requirements for conflict of interest policies and procedures non-federal entities must maintain, including specifically addressing conflicts related to contracts supported by federal awards. Condition: During our testing, we noted the Health Center did not have properly documented procurement policy that met the federal requirements. In addition, there were specific transactions tested in our sample that were above the micro-purchase threshold, but multiple quotes were not obtained, and documentation was not available or appropriate to support why noncompetitive procurement was followed. We also noted the Health Center's conflict of interest policy did not meet all the requirements under Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs: None Context: During our testing, it was noted that the Health Center had documented procurement procedures, which described individuals and parties responsible throughout the procurement process; however, it did not contain all of the necessary elements, as required by federal regulations. Based on our testing, the Health Center followed the policy in place, but the micro purchase threshold requiring multiple quotes or documentation of sole source procurement under the policy is set at $50,000, where the requirement is $10,000 unless specific steps have been taken to certify a higher threshold. Similarly, the Health Center has a conflict of interest policy and procedures in place, but the language does not meet the specific requirements of Uniform Guidance. Noted both policies to be updated to be in compliance with Uniform Guidance compliance near year-end in response to the prior year audit finding, but due to the timing policies in place for majority of year were not in compliance. Cause: The Health Center had not yet updated their procurement and conflict of interest policies to meet Uniform Guidance requirements. Effect: Without updates to procurement and conflict of interest policies over these compliance requirements the Health Center is not fully compliant with Uniform Guidance requirements. Repeat finding: The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number 2021-002 was a significant deficiency. Recommendation: We recommend the Health Center update the procurement and conflict of interest policies to meet Uniform Guidance requirements, and ensure proper documentation is retained for transactions, particularly in cases where single source procurement is utilized over the micro purchase threshold. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Policies were updated near the end of 2022 to be in compliance with requirements.
2022-003 ? Procurement Criteria: The City is responsible for establishing and maintaining a procurement policy which is compliant with the Uniform Guidance in 2 CFR 200.320. In addition, the City is responsible for maintaining adequate records relating to procurements. Condition: The City?s procurement policy lacks the specific methods of procurement to be followed and the respective thresholds for procurements using federal funds. Furthermore, there is not adequate pre-award documentation maintained relating to each of the City?s procurements. Cause: The City?s procurement policy was not adequately updated with necessary Uniform Guidance requirements. In addition, the City?s procurement process is not centralized and there is inadequate or missing pre-award documentation pertaining to the City?s various procurements. Effect: The condition above could result in material program and internal control issues relating to procurements whereby: appropriate methods of procurement may not be followed, debarred or suspended vendors or contractors could be awarded purchase orders or contracts, open and fair competition may not be achieved, etc. Context: Audit procedures noted that the procurement policy is inadequate and not in line with Uniform Guidance. Furthermore, audit procedures noted that there is no centralized process in place for tracking the City?s various procurements along with inadequate pre-award documentation. There was a total of $3,969,370 of expenditures relating to procurements during the year ended December 31, 2022; however, documentation was not deemed adequate to substantiate the procurements and whether they complied with Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs: We questioned $3,969,370 of costs because this equaled the expenditures related to procurements during the year ended December 31, 2022. We reviewed the expenditures for the eight (8) projects with procurements during the year ended December 31, 2022 and determined that there was not appropriate pre-award documentation and an improper procurement policy that would permit the testing of procurements. Recommendation: We recommend that the City adopt a proper procurement policy that is in line with Uniform Guidance. We further recommend that the City develops a centralized procurement process whereby appropriate procurement type is documented along with the maintenance of proper pre-award documentation.
Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Program Name/ALN Title: Emergency Rental Assistance Program Federal Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Federal Agency: Department of Treasury Award Period: 1/1/2022 ? 12/31/2022 Federal Award Number: 21-4619C-130 Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR 200.318(i) states that "the non-Federal entity must maintain record sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price". In addition, 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2)(i) states that "... If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity". Per the Organization's written procurement policy, the adequate number of sources is determined to be three. Condition: For the entire population (two disbursements from one procurement), documentation was not retained for the adequate number of price comparisons prior to exercising the procurement, as required and stated in the Organization's written procurement policy. Context: A sample of two disbursements from a population of one procurement transaction charged to the major program that exceeded the Organization's established micro purchase threshold of $10,000. The transaction was found to be out of compliance with the Procurement requirements, as documentation was not retained for the adequate number of price comparisons. Cause: An employee charged with the procurement process for these transactions misinterpreted the aggregation rules between capitalization and procurement thresholds, and therefore did not obtain nor retain three contemporaneous quotes. Effect: Without adequate records retained, the Organization is at risk of noncompliance with the standards of Procurement. Questioned Costs: Unknown Recommendation: Opportunity Council has already taken steps to communicate the error with the applicable employee and is currently implementing an additional level of fiscal review earlier in the procurement process to ensure that documentation exists prior to procurement and that it is retained with the accounting record. We recommend moving forward with the additional layer of review and emphasizing the importance of the procurement standards and established policy to all authorized purchasers within the Organization. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management accepts the finding and has provided its corrective action plan.
Finding 2022-001: Reportable Finding Considered a Significant Deficiency ? Procurement Assistance Listing Number: 10.181 Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Program: Agricultural Worker Pandemic Relief and Protection Program Award Number: AM22FFWDC0002-00 Grant Years: 2022 Criteria: Nonfederal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200. Section 200.318 General procurement standards, states that the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include but are not necessarily limited to the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Furthermore, Section 200.320 Methods of procurement to be followed, states that for acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the nonfederal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: (a) the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); (b) the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320(b)(2); or (c) the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c). Condition: During our 2022 audit, we noted three consultant contractors which were charged to the Federal program under the competitive proposals method but did not comply with the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b) and one noncompetitive proposals method but did not comply with the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(c). We noted that the Foundation did not have records sufficient to detail the history and the rationale of the method of procurement at the time the contracts were executed. Cause: The Foundation did not document the history or the justification for the method of procurement selected for various consultants charged to the Federal program at the time the contracts were executed. Effect: The Foundation may have inadvertently selected noncompetitive proposals by not following the requirements noted in section 200.320 Methods of procurement to be followed, and thereby failing to full and open competition as required by the regulations. Context: There were four consultants during the audit period for which 2 CFR section 200.320 applied. Questioned Costs: There are no questioned costs associated with this finding. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: The Foundation should adopt and enforce a procurement policy that follows the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. We also recommend that documentation is maintained to substantiate adherence to this policy and ensure that all instances are adequately documented according to the regulations, including for contacts already in place.
Finding number: 2022-001 Repeat finding: No Assistance Listing Number: 93.224 / 93.527 Assistance Listing Title: Health Center Program Cluster Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Type of Finding: Noncompliance, Significant Deficiency Description: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Criteria: Under 2 CFR ?215.43 the Organization is required to implement certain procurement policies that adhere to the minimum Federal requirements as outlined in 2 CFR ?215.44. Non-Federal entities other than States, including those operating Federal programs as subrecipients of States, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR Sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable State and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. Condition: The procurement method the Organization used did not meet procurement standards as set forth in 2 CFR sections 200.320. A sole source procurement method was used when the vendor did not meet the sole source definition. Cause: The Organization was not fully aware of the federal procurement compliance requirements. Effect: The Organization was not in compliance with their own policies or with federal regulations. Recommendation: The Organization should ensure procurement policies are being followed for all procurement levels. The Organozation should also seek out additonal training for procurment to ensure federal rules and requirements are being met. View of responsible officials: Management acknowledges this condition related to lack of adequate controls over procurement and is creating controls that will assure compliance with requirements.
Finding number: 2022-001 Repeat finding: No Assistance Listing Number: 93.224 / 93.527 Assistance Listing Title: Health Center Program Cluster Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Type of Finding: Noncompliance, Significant Deficiency Description: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Criteria: Under 2 CFR ?215.43 the Organization is required to implement certain procurement policies that adhere to the minimum Federal requirements as outlined in 2 CFR ?215.44. Non-Federal entities other than States, including those operating Federal programs as subrecipients of States, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR Sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable State and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. Condition: The procurement method the Organization used did not meet procurement standards as set forth in 2 CFR sections 200.320. A sole source procurement method was used when the vendor did not meet the sole source definition. Cause: The Organization was not fully aware of the federal procurement compliance requirements. Effect: The Organization was not in compliance with their own policies or with federal regulations. Recommendation: The Organization should ensure procurement policies are being followed for all procurement levels. The Organozation should also seek out additonal training for procurment to ensure federal rules and requirements are being met. View of responsible officials: Management acknowledges this condition related to lack of adequate controls over procurement and is creating controls that will assure compliance with requirements.
Finding number: 2022-001 Repeat finding: No Assistance Listing Number: 93.224 / 93.527 Assistance Listing Title: Health Center Program Cluster Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Type of Finding: Noncompliance, Significant Deficiency Description: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Criteria: Under 2 CFR ?215.43 the Organization is required to implement certain procurement policies that adhere to the minimum Federal requirements as outlined in 2 CFR ?215.44. Non-Federal entities other than States, including those operating Federal programs as subrecipients of States, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR Sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable State and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. Condition: The procurement method the Organization used did not meet procurement standards as set forth in 2 CFR sections 200.320. A sole source procurement method was used when the vendor did not meet the sole source definition. Cause: The Organization was not fully aware of the federal procurement compliance requirements. Effect: The Organization was not in compliance with their own policies or with federal regulations. Recommendation: The Organization should ensure procurement policies are being followed for all procurement levels. The Organozation should also seek out additonal training for procurment to ensure federal rules and requirements are being met. View of responsible officials: Management acknowledges this condition related to lack of adequate controls over procurement and is creating controls that will assure compliance with requirements.
Kittitas Reclamation District January 1, 2022 through December 31, 2022 2022-001 The District?s internal controls were inadequate for ensuring it complied with federal procurement requirements. Assistance Listing Number and Title: 15.517 Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act Federal Grantor Name: U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation Federal Award/Contract Number: R22AP00447-00, R21AP10328-03, R18AP00036-02, R21AP10329-01 Pass-through Entity Name: N/A Pass-through Award/Contract Number: N/A Known Questioned Cost Amount: $0 Prior Year Audit Finding: N/A Background The purpose of the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act program is to provide financial assistance, through grants or cooperative agreements, to public or private organizations for the improvement of fish and wildlife habitat associated with water systems or water supplies affected by Bureau of Reclamation projects. During fiscal year 2022, the District spent $7,097,974 in federal Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act funds, which were awarded by the Bureau of Reclamation at the U.S. Department of the Interior. The District used program funding on four projects in Kittitas County. Federal regulations require recipients to establish and maintain internal controls that ensure compliance with program requirements. These controls include understanding grant requirements and monitoring the effectiveness of established controls. Federal regulations require grant recipients to follow their own written procurement procedures, which must conform to the Uniform Guidance procurement standards Page 6 Office of the Washington State Auditor sao.wa.gov found in 2 CFR 200.318-327. These procedures must reflect the most restrictive of applicable federal requirements, state law or local policies. When procuring architectural and engineering services, federal regulations require the District to advertise for each project, identify all evaluation factors and their relative importance, have a written method for conducting technical evaluations, and document the evaluation supporting its decision to go with the best engineer for each separate award. Description of Condition The District has a written policy that conforms to federal regulations that require a qualifications-based selection of architectural and engineering services. However, when it procured its engineer for the four projects, the District selected from an engineering roster, which is not in compliance with its own policy and the Uniform Guidance (2 CFR 200.320(b)(2)). We consider this control deficiency to be a significant deficiency. Cause of Condition The District followed guidance from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers when creating its architectural and engineering roster, which allowed for a base contract to be awarded to a pool of firms. District officials thought this was an acceptable method to follow and were not aware the District cannot select architects and engineers from a roster when using federal funds to pay for projects. Effect of Condition The District paid one engineer $462,617 with federal funds during the audit period. Without effective internal controls, the District cannot ensure it allowed for full and open competition, selected the most qualified engineer, and complied with federal procurement requirements. Recommendation We recommend the District strengthen internal controls over its procurement of architectural and engineering services to ensure compliance with federal requirements. District?s Response The Kittitas Reclamation District (District) has made a considerable effort to obtain critical climate resiliency and water conservation grant funding over the last 7 years. In that period, the District has been awarded several state and federal awards for infrastructure projects requiring engineering services. These projects were audited and found compliant. Internally, the District?s processes and procedures have been scrutinized and revised after receiving constructive input from prior auditors. It is the District's priority to continue to set a standard of excellence as the District proceeds into the future enhancing the irrigation system and works towards essential water conservation efforts while improving the ecosystem to allow the system to benefit future generations. As the funding opportunities grew, there was a collaborative effort made with the District consultants to utilize the funding opportunities as they arose. Keeping site on the fact that work had to be accomplished within the limited construction window during the winter months when the irrigation system was not running water and being used by the landowners. There was extensive work done to draft and create a Multi-Year Multiple Award Task Order (IDIQ) for Professional Services which allows the District to acquire an indefinite quantity, within stated limits, of supplies or services during a fixed period, with deliveries to be scheduled by placing orders with a contractor. The Federal Acquisition Streamlining Act (FASA) allows agencies to use IDIQ contracts to benefit from an ongoing competitive environment throughout the duration of the contract while minimizing the delay of conducting a separate procurement for each project. The process included developing a scope of work, advertising in multiple newspapers for solicitation of services, establishing a list of qualified applicants, scoring the applicants and utilizing the awardees for prospective funding opportunities as they were granted. The length of the IDIQ has changed from the initial one-year term to the current 5-year term but beyond the term of the contract the process has been unchanged. This process was reviewed in prior audits and the District was not asked to make any changes to the process in past audits. When the current engineering services contracts were procured, the District understood it had met all the uniform guidance and after the appropriate advertising and with only two engineering firms responding, both responding firms were awarded an Indefinite Delivery Contracts (IDICs) in accordance with our interpretation of FAR 16.5 and FAR 36.602-1. These IDCs comprise the District?s roster for engineer firms based on their qualifications relative to the criteria established for Category 1 under the Notice to Consultants, 2022 Kittitas Reclamation District (KRD) On-Call Rosters advertised and evaluated in Page 8 Office of the Washington State Auditor sao.wa.gov February 2022. Specifically, the District Request for Qualifications solicitation evaluated firms on four criteria, qualifications of firm (up to 20points), qualifications of proposed Project Manager(s) (up to 30 points), firm?s technical expertise (up to 50 points), and references/past performances (up to 50 points). The competitive, qualifications-based roster selection is not the same roster or process utilized for the District Vendor List for Limited Public Works and Small Works Roster. The District has since learned that it should have kept documentation as to how the Engineering Firm was chosen for each task order project awarded within the IDC scope. There was no formal documentation to provide on the selection process for each individual project. It should also be noted that, particularly with an irrigation canal, it is imperative to have continuity of engineering on the same project that continues from one winter construction window and funding cycle to the next to ensure the integrity of the canal system and the most efficient use of funds for each project. Upon receiving the guidance on the current audit, the District would like to move forward by reviewing the procurement policy and making any necessary changes while working under the guidance of the SAO Procurement Specialist to ensure that an updated procurement policy continues to meet the needs of the District and the federal guidelines for federal funding. Auditor?s Remarks We appreciate the steps the District?s commitment to resolving this finding and thank the District for its cooperation and assistance during the audit. We will review the corrective action taken during our next audit. Applicable Laws and Regulations Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), section 516, Audit findings, establishes reporting requirements for audit findings. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Guidance, section 303, Internal controls, describes the requirements for auditees to maintain internal controls over federal programs and comply with federal program requirements. Page 9 Office of the Washington State Auditor sao.wa.gov The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants defines significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in its Codification of Statements on Auditing Standards, section 935, Compliance Audits, paragraph 11. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Guidance, section 320, Methods of procurement to be followed, establishes requirements for procuring with federal funds by nonfederal entities.
Kittitas Reclamation District January 1, 2022 through December 31, 2022 2022-001 The District?s internal controls were inadequate for ensuring it complied with federal procurement requirements. Assistance Listing Number and Title: 15.517 Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act Federal Grantor Name: U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation Federal Award/Contract Number: R22AP00447-00, R21AP10328-03, R18AP00036-02, R21AP10329-01 Pass-through Entity Name: N/A Pass-through Award/Contract Number: N/A Known Questioned Cost Amount: $0 Prior Year Audit Finding: N/A Background The purpose of the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act program is to provide financial assistance, through grants or cooperative agreements, to public or private organizations for the improvement of fish and wildlife habitat associated with water systems or water supplies affected by Bureau of Reclamation projects. During fiscal year 2022, the District spent $7,097,974 in federal Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act funds, which were awarded by the Bureau of Reclamation at the U.S. Department of the Interior. The District used program funding on four projects in Kittitas County. Federal regulations require recipients to establish and maintain internal controls that ensure compliance with program requirements. These controls include understanding grant requirements and monitoring the effectiveness of established controls. Federal regulations require grant recipients to follow their own written procurement procedures, which must conform to the Uniform Guidance procurement standards Page 6 Office of the Washington State Auditor sao.wa.gov found in 2 CFR 200.318-327. These procedures must reflect the most restrictive of applicable federal requirements, state law or local policies. When procuring architectural and engineering services, federal regulations require the District to advertise for each project, identify all evaluation factors and their relative importance, have a written method for conducting technical evaluations, and document the evaluation supporting its decision to go with the best engineer for each separate award. Description of Condition The District has a written policy that conforms to federal regulations that require a qualifications-based selection of architectural and engineering services. However, when it procured its engineer for the four projects, the District selected from an engineering roster, which is not in compliance with its own policy and the Uniform Guidance (2 CFR 200.320(b)(2)). We consider this control deficiency to be a significant deficiency. Cause of Condition The District followed guidance from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers when creating its architectural and engineering roster, which allowed for a base contract to be awarded to a pool of firms. District officials thought this was an acceptable method to follow and were not aware the District cannot select architects and engineers from a roster when using federal funds to pay for projects. Effect of Condition The District paid one engineer $462,617 with federal funds during the audit period. Without effective internal controls, the District cannot ensure it allowed for full and open competition, selected the most qualified engineer, and complied with federal procurement requirements. Recommendation We recommend the District strengthen internal controls over its procurement of architectural and engineering services to ensure compliance with federal requirements. District?s Response The Kittitas Reclamation District (District) has made a considerable effort to obtain critical climate resiliency and water conservation grant funding over the last 7 years. In that period, the District has been awarded several state and federal awards for infrastructure projects requiring engineering services. These projects were audited and found compliant. Internally, the District?s processes and procedures have been scrutinized and revised after receiving constructive input from prior auditors. It is the District's priority to continue to set a standard of excellence as the District proceeds into the future enhancing the irrigation system and works towards essential water conservation efforts while improving the ecosystem to allow the system to benefit future generations. As the funding opportunities grew, there was a collaborative effort made with the District consultants to utilize the funding opportunities as they arose. Keeping site on the fact that work had to be accomplished within the limited construction window during the winter months when the irrigation system was not running water and being used by the landowners. There was extensive work done to draft and create a Multi-Year Multiple Award Task Order (IDIQ) for Professional Services which allows the District to acquire an indefinite quantity, within stated limits, of supplies or services during a fixed period, with deliveries to be scheduled by placing orders with a contractor. The Federal Acquisition Streamlining Act (FASA) allows agencies to use IDIQ contracts to benefit from an ongoing competitive environment throughout the duration of the contract while minimizing the delay of conducting a separate procurement for each project. The process included developing a scope of work, advertising in multiple newspapers for solicitation of services, establishing a list of qualified applicants, scoring the applicants and utilizing the awardees for prospective funding opportunities as they were granted. The length of the IDIQ has changed from the initial one-year term to the current 5-year term but beyond the term of the contract the process has been unchanged. This process was reviewed in prior audits and the District was not asked to make any changes to the process in past audits. When the current engineering services contracts were procured, the District understood it had met all the uniform guidance and after the appropriate advertising and with only two engineering firms responding, both responding firms were awarded an Indefinite Delivery Contracts (IDICs) in accordance with our interpretation of FAR 16.5 and FAR 36.602-1. These IDCs comprise the District?s roster for engineer firms based on their qualifications relative to the criteria established for Category 1 under the Notice to Consultants, 2022 Kittitas Reclamation District (KRD) On-Call Rosters advertised and evaluated in Page 8 Office of the Washington State Auditor sao.wa.gov February 2022. Specifically, the District Request for Qualifications solicitation evaluated firms on four criteria, qualifications of firm (up to 20points), qualifications of proposed Project Manager(s) (up to 30 points), firm?s technical expertise (up to 50 points), and references/past performances (up to 50 points). The competitive, qualifications-based roster selection is not the same roster or process utilized for the District Vendor List for Limited Public Works and Small Works Roster. The District has since learned that it should have kept documentation as to how the Engineering Firm was chosen for each task order project awarded within the IDC scope. There was no formal documentation to provide on the selection process for each individual project. It should also be noted that, particularly with an irrigation canal, it is imperative to have continuity of engineering on the same project that continues from one winter construction window and funding cycle to the next to ensure the integrity of the canal system and the most efficient use of funds for each project. Upon receiving the guidance on the current audit, the District would like to move forward by reviewing the procurement policy and making any necessary changes while working under the guidance of the SAO Procurement Specialist to ensure that an updated procurement policy continues to meet the needs of the District and the federal guidelines for federal funding. Auditor?s Remarks We appreciate the steps the District?s commitment to resolving this finding and thank the District for its cooperation and assistance during the audit. We will review the corrective action taken during our next audit. Applicable Laws and Regulations Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), section 516, Audit findings, establishes reporting requirements for audit findings. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Guidance, section 303, Internal controls, describes the requirements for auditees to maintain internal controls over federal programs and comply with federal program requirements. Page 9 Office of the Washington State Auditor sao.wa.gov The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants defines significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in its Codification of Statements on Auditing Standards, section 935, Compliance Audits, paragraph 11. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Guidance, section 320, Methods of procurement to be followed, establishes requirements for procuring with federal funds by nonfederal entities.
Kittitas Reclamation District January 1, 2022 through December 31, 2022 2022-001 The District?s internal controls were inadequate for ensuring it complied with federal procurement requirements. Assistance Listing Number and Title: 15.517 Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act Federal Grantor Name: U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation Federal Award/Contract Number: R22AP00447-00, R21AP10328-03, R18AP00036-02, R21AP10329-01 Pass-through Entity Name: N/A Pass-through Award/Contract Number: N/A Known Questioned Cost Amount: $0 Prior Year Audit Finding: N/A Background The purpose of the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act program is to provide financial assistance, through grants or cooperative agreements, to public or private organizations for the improvement of fish and wildlife habitat associated with water systems or water supplies affected by Bureau of Reclamation projects. During fiscal year 2022, the District spent $7,097,974 in federal Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act funds, which were awarded by the Bureau of Reclamation at the U.S. Department of the Interior. The District used program funding on four projects in Kittitas County. Federal regulations require recipients to establish and maintain internal controls that ensure compliance with program requirements. These controls include understanding grant requirements and monitoring the effectiveness of established controls. Federal regulations require grant recipients to follow their own written procurement procedures, which must conform to the Uniform Guidance procurement standards Page 6 Office of the Washington State Auditor sao.wa.gov found in 2 CFR 200.318-327. These procedures must reflect the most restrictive of applicable federal requirements, state law or local policies. When procuring architectural and engineering services, federal regulations require the District to advertise for each project, identify all evaluation factors and their relative importance, have a written method for conducting technical evaluations, and document the evaluation supporting its decision to go with the best engineer for each separate award. Description of Condition The District has a written policy that conforms to federal regulations that require a qualifications-based selection of architectural and engineering services. However, when it procured its engineer for the four projects, the District selected from an engineering roster, which is not in compliance with its own policy and the Uniform Guidance (2 CFR 200.320(b)(2)). We consider this control deficiency to be a significant deficiency. Cause of Condition The District followed guidance from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers when creating its architectural and engineering roster, which allowed for a base contract to be awarded to a pool of firms. District officials thought this was an acceptable method to follow and were not aware the District cannot select architects and engineers from a roster when using federal funds to pay for projects. Effect of Condition The District paid one engineer $462,617 with federal funds during the audit period. Without effective internal controls, the District cannot ensure it allowed for full and open competition, selected the most qualified engineer, and complied with federal procurement requirements. Recommendation We recommend the District strengthen internal controls over its procurement of architectural and engineering services to ensure compliance with federal requirements. District?s Response The Kittitas Reclamation District (District) has made a considerable effort to obtain critical climate resiliency and water conservation grant funding over the last 7 years. In that period, the District has been awarded several state and federal awards for infrastructure projects requiring engineering services. These projects were audited and found compliant. Internally, the District?s processes and procedures have been scrutinized and revised after receiving constructive input from prior auditors. It is the District's priority to continue to set a standard of excellence as the District proceeds into the future enhancing the irrigation system and works towards essential water conservation efforts while improving the ecosystem to allow the system to benefit future generations. As the funding opportunities grew, there was a collaborative effort made with the District consultants to utilize the funding opportunities as they arose. Keeping site on the fact that work had to be accomplished within the limited construction window during the winter months when the irrigation system was not running water and being used by the landowners. There was extensive work done to draft and create a Multi-Year Multiple Award Task Order (IDIQ) for Professional Services which allows the District to acquire an indefinite quantity, within stated limits, of supplies or services during a fixed period, with deliveries to be scheduled by placing orders with a contractor. The Federal Acquisition Streamlining Act (FASA) allows agencies to use IDIQ contracts to benefit from an ongoing competitive environment throughout the duration of the contract while minimizing the delay of conducting a separate procurement for each project. The process included developing a scope of work, advertising in multiple newspapers for solicitation of services, establishing a list of qualified applicants, scoring the applicants and utilizing the awardees for prospective funding opportunities as they were granted. The length of the IDIQ has changed from the initial one-year term to the current 5-year term but beyond the term of the contract the process has been unchanged. This process was reviewed in prior audits and the District was not asked to make any changes to the process in past audits. When the current engineering services contracts were procured, the District understood it had met all the uniform guidance and after the appropriate advertising and with only two engineering firms responding, both responding firms were awarded an Indefinite Delivery Contracts (IDICs) in accordance with our interpretation of FAR 16.5 and FAR 36.602-1. These IDCs comprise the District?s roster for engineer firms based on their qualifications relative to the criteria established for Category 1 under the Notice to Consultants, 2022 Kittitas Reclamation District (KRD) On-Call Rosters advertised and evaluated in Page 8 Office of the Washington State Auditor sao.wa.gov February 2022. Specifically, the District Request for Qualifications solicitation evaluated firms on four criteria, qualifications of firm (up to 20points), qualifications of proposed Project Manager(s) (up to 30 points), firm?s technical expertise (up to 50 points), and references/past performances (up to 50 points). The competitive, qualifications-based roster selection is not the same roster or process utilized for the District Vendor List for Limited Public Works and Small Works Roster. The District has since learned that it should have kept documentation as to how the Engineering Firm was chosen for each task order project awarded within the IDC scope. There was no formal documentation to provide on the selection process for each individual project. It should also be noted that, particularly with an irrigation canal, it is imperative to have continuity of engineering on the same project that continues from one winter construction window and funding cycle to the next to ensure the integrity of the canal system and the most efficient use of funds for each project. Upon receiving the guidance on the current audit, the District would like to move forward by reviewing the procurement policy and making any necessary changes while working under the guidance of the SAO Procurement Specialist to ensure that an updated procurement policy continues to meet the needs of the District and the federal guidelines for federal funding. Auditor?s Remarks We appreciate the steps the District?s commitment to resolving this finding and thank the District for its cooperation and assistance during the audit. We will review the corrective action taken during our next audit. Applicable Laws and Regulations Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), section 516, Audit findings, establishes reporting requirements for audit findings. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Guidance, section 303, Internal controls, describes the requirements for auditees to maintain internal controls over federal programs and comply with federal program requirements. Page 9 Office of the Washington State Auditor sao.wa.gov The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants defines significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in its Codification of Statements on Auditing Standards, section 935, Compliance Audits, paragraph 11. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Guidance, section 320, Methods of procurement to be followed, establishes requirements for procuring with federal funds by nonfederal entities.