2023-004 (2021-005) – FEDERAL AND FINANCIAL PROCUREMENT, SUSPENSION, AND DEBARMENT COMPLIANCE Type of Finding: (B, F, G) – Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting, Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Compliance of Federal Awards and Instance of Non-Compliance Related to Federal Awards Funding Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Title: Emergency Solution Grant (ESG) Program AL #: 14.231 Award #: 20-02-HDH-EHA-001, E-22-MC-35-0001 Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Questioned Costs: None Statement of Condition Heading Home did not follow federal procurement, suspension and debarment regulations or its federal procurement policy. Context During our testing of procurement, suspension, and debarment we noted the following: • We sampled two (out of a population of two) vendors who received more than $10,000 in fiscal year 2023 and noted no evidence of obtaining bids or quotes. Additionally, adequate sole source documentation was absent to support the procurement. • We sampled two (out of a population of two) vendors for tests of internal control over compliance and noted that Heading Home did not provide evidence of internal controls regarding suspension and debarment requirements. Criteria • Heading Home’s procurement policy states that for purchases exceeding $10,000, three (3) written competitive bids must be obtained before selecting a vendor. • Per 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2)(i) Small purchases - o (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold ($10,000 in fiscal year 2023) but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold ($249,999 in fiscal year 2023). If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. • Additionally, 2 CFR 200.214 requires vendors awarded contracts expected to equal or exceed $25,000 to be checked for suspension and debarment via the System for Award Management Exclusions (SAM.gov). Heading Home is required to verify that entities it plans to do business with are not excluded or disqualified under the federal procurement regulations and the non-procurement common rule, or otherwise declared ineligible under statutory or regulatory authority. According to §200.303 Internal controls of 2 CFR Part 200, the nonfederal entity (Heading Home) must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provide reasonable assurance that Heading Home is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). According to §180.300 of Subpart C–Responsibilities of Participants Regarding Transactions Doing Business with Other Persons of 2 CFR Part 180, when you entering into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person you intend to conduct business with is not excluded or disqualified. This can be done by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. Cause Heading Home has not followed its policies and procedures related to procurement. Additionally, the procurement policy does not include the requirement for checking suspension and debarment via SAM.gov. Effect Heading Home is not in compliance with its policies and the federal procurement, suspension, and debarment requirements. Heading Home may have entered into contracts with ineligible contractors, exposing itself to potential liability and the risk of losing federal funds. Recommendation We recommend Heading Home follow its internal control policies and procedures related to procurement, as well as the following: • Document controls such as including the procurement files include proof of SAM.gov verification to ensure compliance with federal procurement regulations and internal procurement policy. • Implement policies and procedures to verify contractor suspension or debarment status before awarding contracts using federal funds. • Include the required suspension and debarment clause in contracts with federally funded contractors. View of Responsible Official and Corrective Action Plan Heading Home management agrees with this finding. Management has reviewed existing procurement policies and procedures found in Section III Policy #301 of Heading Home’s fiscal policies and procedures with appropriate staff and will enforce policies and procedures to ensure competitive bids are obtained where required. Management has also reviewed the existing suspension and debarment policies and procedures found in Section III Policy #302 with appropriate staff, and which require vendors to be reviewed on the SAM website, to ensure they have not been suspended or debarred. Although this review was conducted after the fact, each of the five vendors noted in this finding has since been reviewed on the SAM website, and none of them returned a notice of suspension or debarment. Management is in the process of reviewing all vendors paid $10,000 or more against the SAM website and will ensure all vendors are checked against the website who currently meet this requirement, as well as for those anticipated to meet this threshold. Proof of the SAM website review and approval will be maintained in each vendor file. Management reviewed the above mentioned vendors and noted none of them were suspended or debarred. Circumstantial evidence consisting of emails leads the organization to believe bids/quotes were in fact solicited but the actual procurement packets could not be located due to the extensive turnover in management during 2023. Management anticipates the above corrective action plan will be fully implemented by September 30, 2025. The personnel responsible for overseeing implementation include Connie Chavez, Chief Executive Officer; Debbie Brickman, Chief Financial Officer; and Armando Sanchez, contract accountant team lead.
2023-004 (2021-005) – FEDERAL AND FINANCIAL PROCUREMENT, SUSPENSION, AND DEBARMENT COMPLIANCE Type of Finding: (B, F, G) – Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting, Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Compliance of Federal Awards and Instance of Non-Compliance Related to Federal Awards Funding Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Title: Emergency Solution Grant (ESG) Program AL #: 14.231 Award #: 20-02-HDH-EHA-001, E-22-MC-35-0001 Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Questioned Costs: None Statement of Condition Heading Home did not follow federal procurement, suspension and debarment regulations or its federal procurement policy. Context During our testing of procurement, suspension, and debarment we noted the following: • We sampled two (out of a population of two) vendors who received more than $10,000 in fiscal year 2023 and noted no evidence of obtaining bids or quotes. Additionally, adequate sole source documentation was absent to support the procurement. • We sampled two (out of a population of two) vendors for tests of internal control over compliance and noted that Heading Home did not provide evidence of internal controls regarding suspension and debarment requirements. Criteria • Heading Home’s procurement policy states that for purchases exceeding $10,000, three (3) written competitive bids must be obtained before selecting a vendor. • Per 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2)(i) Small purchases - o (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold ($10,000 in fiscal year 2023) but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold ($249,999 in fiscal year 2023). If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. • Additionally, 2 CFR 200.214 requires vendors awarded contracts expected to equal or exceed $25,000 to be checked for suspension and debarment via the System for Award Management Exclusions (SAM.gov). Heading Home is required to verify that entities it plans to do business with are not excluded or disqualified under the federal procurement regulations and the non-procurement common rule, or otherwise declared ineligible under statutory or regulatory authority. According to §200.303 Internal controls of 2 CFR Part 200, the nonfederal entity (Heading Home) must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provide reasonable assurance that Heading Home is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). According to §180.300 of Subpart C–Responsibilities of Participants Regarding Transactions Doing Business with Other Persons of 2 CFR Part 180, when you entering into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person you intend to conduct business with is not excluded or disqualified. This can be done by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. Cause Heading Home has not followed its policies and procedures related to procurement. Additionally, the procurement policy does not include the requirement for checking suspension and debarment via SAM.gov. Effect Heading Home is not in compliance with its policies and the federal procurement, suspension, and debarment requirements. Heading Home may have entered into contracts with ineligible contractors, exposing itself to potential liability and the risk of losing federal funds. Recommendation We recommend Heading Home follow its internal control policies and procedures related to procurement, as well as the following: • Document controls such as including the procurement files include proof of SAM.gov verification to ensure compliance with federal procurement regulations and internal procurement policy. • Implement policies and procedures to verify contractor suspension or debarment status before awarding contracts using federal funds. • Include the required suspension and debarment clause in contracts with federally funded contractors. View of Responsible Official and Corrective Action Plan Heading Home management agrees with this finding. Management has reviewed existing procurement policies and procedures found in Section III Policy #301 of Heading Home’s fiscal policies and procedures with appropriate staff and will enforce policies and procedures to ensure competitive bids are obtained where required. Management has also reviewed the existing suspension and debarment policies and procedures found in Section III Policy #302 with appropriate staff, and which require vendors to be reviewed on the SAM website, to ensure they have not been suspended or debarred. Although this review was conducted after the fact, each of the five vendors noted in this finding has since been reviewed on the SAM website, and none of them returned a notice of suspension or debarment. Management is in the process of reviewing all vendors paid $10,000 or more against the SAM website and will ensure all vendors are checked against the website who currently meet this requirement, as well as for those anticipated to meet this threshold. Proof of the SAM website review and approval will be maintained in each vendor file. Management reviewed the above mentioned vendors and noted none of them were suspended or debarred. Circumstantial evidence consisting of emails leads the organization to believe bids/quotes were in fact solicited but the actual procurement packets could not be located due to the extensive turnover in management during 2023. Management anticipates the above corrective action plan will be fully implemented by September 30, 2025. The personnel responsible for overseeing implementation include Connie Chavez, Chief Executive Officer; Debbie Brickman, Chief Financial Officer; and Armando Sanchez, contract accountant team lead.
2023-004 (2021-005) – FEDERAL AND FINANCIAL PROCUREMENT, SUSPENSION, AND DEBARMENT COMPLIANCE Type of Finding: (B, F, G) – Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting, Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Compliance of Federal Awards and Instance of Non-Compliance Related to Federal Awards Funding Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Title: Emergency Solution Grant (ESG) Program AL #: 14.231 Award #: 20-02-HDH-EHA-001, E-22-MC-35-0001 Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Questioned Costs: None Statement of Condition Heading Home did not follow federal procurement, suspension and debarment regulations or its federal procurement policy. Context During our testing of procurement, suspension, and debarment we noted the following: • We sampled two (out of a population of two) vendors who received more than $10,000 in fiscal year 2023 and noted no evidence of obtaining bids or quotes. Additionally, adequate sole source documentation was absent to support the procurement. • We sampled two (out of a population of two) vendors for tests of internal control over compliance and noted that Heading Home did not provide evidence of internal controls regarding suspension and debarment requirements. Criteria • Heading Home’s procurement policy states that for purchases exceeding $10,000, three (3) written competitive bids must be obtained before selecting a vendor. • Per 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2)(i) Small purchases - o (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold ($10,000 in fiscal year 2023) but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold ($249,999 in fiscal year 2023). If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. • Additionally, 2 CFR 200.214 requires vendors awarded contracts expected to equal or exceed $25,000 to be checked for suspension and debarment via the System for Award Management Exclusions (SAM.gov). Heading Home is required to verify that entities it plans to do business with are not excluded or disqualified under the federal procurement regulations and the non-procurement common rule, or otherwise declared ineligible under statutory or regulatory authority. According to §200.303 Internal controls of 2 CFR Part 200, the nonfederal entity (Heading Home) must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provide reasonable assurance that Heading Home is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). According to §180.300 of Subpart C–Responsibilities of Participants Regarding Transactions Doing Business with Other Persons of 2 CFR Part 180, when you entering into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person you intend to conduct business with is not excluded or disqualified. This can be done by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. Cause Heading Home has not followed its policies and procedures related to procurement. Additionally, the procurement policy does not include the requirement for checking suspension and debarment via SAM.gov. Effect Heading Home is not in compliance with its policies and the federal procurement, suspension, and debarment requirements. Heading Home may have entered into contracts with ineligible contractors, exposing itself to potential liability and the risk of losing federal funds. Recommendation We recommend Heading Home follow its internal control policies and procedures related to procurement, as well as the following: • Document controls such as including the procurement files include proof of SAM.gov verification to ensure compliance with federal procurement regulations and internal procurement policy. • Implement policies and procedures to verify contractor suspension or debarment status before awarding contracts using federal funds. • Include the required suspension and debarment clause in contracts with federally funded contractors. View of Responsible Official and Corrective Action Plan Heading Home management agrees with this finding. Management has reviewed existing procurement policies and procedures found in Section III Policy #301 of Heading Home’s fiscal policies and procedures with appropriate staff and will enforce policies and procedures to ensure competitive bids are obtained where required. Management has also reviewed the existing suspension and debarment policies and procedures found in Section III Policy #302 with appropriate staff, and which require vendors to be reviewed on the SAM website, to ensure they have not been suspended or debarred. Although this review was conducted after the fact, each of the five vendors noted in this finding has since been reviewed on the SAM website, and none of them returned a notice of suspension or debarment. Management is in the process of reviewing all vendors paid $10,000 or more against the SAM website and will ensure all vendors are checked against the website who currently meet this requirement, as well as for those anticipated to meet this threshold. Proof of the SAM website review and approval will be maintained in each vendor file. Management reviewed the above mentioned vendors and noted none of them were suspended or debarred. Circumstantial evidence consisting of emails leads the organization to believe bids/quotes were in fact solicited but the actual procurement packets could not be located due to the extensive turnover in management during 2023. Management anticipates the above corrective action plan will be fully implemented by September 30, 2025. The personnel responsible for overseeing implementation include Connie Chavez, Chief Executive Officer; Debbie Brickman, Chief Financial Officer; and Armando Sanchez, contract accountant team lead.
2023 – 025 – Procurement Policy Federal Agency: Various Federal Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Uniform guidance requires auditees to follow procurement standards set forth. sections of the Uniform Guidance set forth five permissible procurement methods for non-Federal entities expending Federal financial assistance: (1) micro-purchases (§ 200.320(a)(1)); (2) small purchases (§ 200.320(a)(2)); (3) sealed bids (§ 200.320(b)(1)); (4) proposals (§ 200.320(b)(2)); and (5) noncompetitive procurement (§ 200.320(c)(1)-(5)). Condition: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs: None. Context: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance related to defining the required levels of procurement and when competitive bids are required. Cause: The University did not have a process in place to ensure the procurement policy met Uniform Guidance. Effect: The University is not in compliance with Uniform Guidance for procurement. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University review its procurement policy to insure it meets federal regulations. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2023 – 025 – Procurement Policy Federal Agency: Various Federal Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Uniform guidance requires auditees to follow procurement standards set forth. sections of the Uniform Guidance set forth five permissible procurement methods for non-Federal entities expending Federal financial assistance: (1) micro-purchases (§ 200.320(a)(1)); (2) small purchases (§ 200.320(a)(2)); (3) sealed bids (§ 200.320(b)(1)); (4) proposals (§ 200.320(b)(2)); and (5) noncompetitive procurement (§ 200.320(c)(1)-(5)). Condition: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs: None. Context: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance related to defining the required levels of procurement and when competitive bids are required. Cause: The University did not have a process in place to ensure the procurement policy met Uniform Guidance. Effect: The University is not in compliance with Uniform Guidance for procurement. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University review its procurement policy to insure it meets federal regulations. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2023 – 025 – Procurement Policy Federal Agency: Various Federal Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Uniform guidance requires auditees to follow procurement standards set forth. sections of the Uniform Guidance set forth five permissible procurement methods for non-Federal entities expending Federal financial assistance: (1) micro-purchases (§ 200.320(a)(1)); (2) small purchases (§ 200.320(a)(2)); (3) sealed bids (§ 200.320(b)(1)); (4) proposals (§ 200.320(b)(2)); and (5) noncompetitive procurement (§ 200.320(c)(1)-(5)). Condition: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs: None. Context: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance related to defining the required levels of procurement and when competitive bids are required. Cause: The University did not have a process in place to ensure the procurement policy met Uniform Guidance. Effect: The University is not in compliance with Uniform Guidance for procurement. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University review its procurement policy to insure it meets federal regulations. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2023 – 025 – Procurement Policy Federal Agency: Various Federal Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Uniform guidance requires auditees to follow procurement standards set forth. sections of the Uniform Guidance set forth five permissible procurement methods for non-Federal entities expending Federal financial assistance: (1) micro-purchases (§ 200.320(a)(1)); (2) small purchases (§ 200.320(a)(2)); (3) sealed bids (§ 200.320(b)(1)); (4) proposals (§ 200.320(b)(2)); and (5) noncompetitive procurement (§ 200.320(c)(1)-(5)). Condition: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs: None. Context: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance related to defining the required levels of procurement and when competitive bids are required. Cause: The University did not have a process in place to ensure the procurement policy met Uniform Guidance. Effect: The University is not in compliance with Uniform Guidance for procurement. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University review its procurement policy to insure it meets federal regulations. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2023 – 025 – Procurement Policy Federal Agency: Various Federal Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Uniform guidance requires auditees to follow procurement standards set forth. sections of the Uniform Guidance set forth five permissible procurement methods for non-Federal entities expending Federal financial assistance: (1) micro-purchases (§ 200.320(a)(1)); (2) small purchases (§ 200.320(a)(2)); (3) sealed bids (§ 200.320(b)(1)); (4) proposals (§ 200.320(b)(2)); and (5) noncompetitive procurement (§ 200.320(c)(1)-(5)). Condition: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs: None. Context: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance related to defining the required levels of procurement and when competitive bids are required. Cause: The University did not have a process in place to ensure the procurement policy met Uniform Guidance. Effect: The University is not in compliance with Uniform Guidance for procurement. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University review its procurement policy to insure it meets federal regulations. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2023 – 025 – Procurement Policy Federal Agency: Various Federal Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Uniform guidance requires auditees to follow procurement standards set forth. sections of the Uniform Guidance set forth five permissible procurement methods for non-Federal entities expending Federal financial assistance: (1) micro-purchases (§ 200.320(a)(1)); (2) small purchases (§ 200.320(a)(2)); (3) sealed bids (§ 200.320(b)(1)); (4) proposals (§ 200.320(b)(2)); and (5) noncompetitive procurement (§ 200.320(c)(1)-(5)). Condition: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs: None. Context: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance related to defining the required levels of procurement and when competitive bids are required. Cause: The University did not have a process in place to ensure the procurement policy met Uniform Guidance. Effect: The University is not in compliance with Uniform Guidance for procurement. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University review its procurement policy to insure it meets federal regulations. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2023 – 025 – Procurement Policy Federal Agency: Various Federal Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Uniform guidance requires auditees to follow procurement standards set forth. sections of the Uniform Guidance set forth five permissible procurement methods for non-Federal entities expending Federal financial assistance: (1) micro-purchases (§ 200.320(a)(1)); (2) small purchases (§ 200.320(a)(2)); (3) sealed bids (§ 200.320(b)(1)); (4) proposals (§ 200.320(b)(2)); and (5) noncompetitive procurement (§ 200.320(c)(1)-(5)). Condition: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs: None. Context: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance related to defining the required levels of procurement and when competitive bids are required. Cause: The University did not have a process in place to ensure the procurement policy met Uniform Guidance. Effect: The University is not in compliance with Uniform Guidance for procurement. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University review its procurement policy to insure it meets federal regulations. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2023 – 025 – Procurement Policy Federal Agency: Various Federal Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Uniform guidance requires auditees to follow procurement standards set forth. sections of the Uniform Guidance set forth five permissible procurement methods for non-Federal entities expending Federal financial assistance: (1) micro-purchases (§ 200.320(a)(1)); (2) small purchases (§ 200.320(a)(2)); (3) sealed bids (§ 200.320(b)(1)); (4) proposals (§ 200.320(b)(2)); and (5) noncompetitive procurement (§ 200.320(c)(1)-(5)). Condition: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs: None. Context: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance related to defining the required levels of procurement and when competitive bids are required. Cause: The University did not have a process in place to ensure the procurement policy met Uniform Guidance. Effect: The University is not in compliance with Uniform Guidance for procurement. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University review its procurement policy to insure it meets federal regulations. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2023 – 025 – Procurement Policy Federal Agency: Various Federal Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Uniform guidance requires auditees to follow procurement standards set forth. sections of the Uniform Guidance set forth five permissible procurement methods for non-Federal entities expending Federal financial assistance: (1) micro-purchases (§ 200.320(a)(1)); (2) small purchases (§ 200.320(a)(2)); (3) sealed bids (§ 200.320(b)(1)); (4) proposals (§ 200.320(b)(2)); and (5) noncompetitive procurement (§ 200.320(c)(1)-(5)). Condition: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs: None. Context: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance related to defining the required levels of procurement and when competitive bids are required. Cause: The University did not have a process in place to ensure the procurement policy met Uniform Guidance. Effect: The University is not in compliance with Uniform Guidance for procurement. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University review its procurement policy to insure it meets federal regulations. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2023 – 025 – Procurement Policy Federal Agency: Various Federal Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Uniform guidance requires auditees to follow procurement standards set forth. sections of the Uniform Guidance set forth five permissible procurement methods for non-Federal entities expending Federal financial assistance: (1) micro-purchases (§ 200.320(a)(1)); (2) small purchases (§ 200.320(a)(2)); (3) sealed bids (§ 200.320(b)(1)); (4) proposals (§ 200.320(b)(2)); and (5) noncompetitive procurement (§ 200.320(c)(1)-(5)). Condition: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs: None. Context: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance related to defining the required levels of procurement and when competitive bids are required. Cause: The University did not have a process in place to ensure the procurement policy met Uniform Guidance. Effect: The University is not in compliance with Uniform Guidance for procurement. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University review its procurement policy to insure it meets federal regulations. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2023 – 025 – Procurement Policy Federal Agency: Various Federal Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Uniform guidance requires auditees to follow procurement standards set forth. sections of the Uniform Guidance set forth five permissible procurement methods for non-Federal entities expending Federal financial assistance: (1) micro-purchases (§ 200.320(a)(1)); (2) small purchases (§ 200.320(a)(2)); (3) sealed bids (§ 200.320(b)(1)); (4) proposals (§ 200.320(b)(2)); and (5) noncompetitive procurement (§ 200.320(c)(1)-(5)). Condition: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs: None. Context: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance related to defining the required levels of procurement and when competitive bids are required. Cause: The University did not have a process in place to ensure the procurement policy met Uniform Guidance. Effect: The University is not in compliance with Uniform Guidance for procurement. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University review its procurement policy to insure it meets federal regulations. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2023 – 025 – Procurement Policy Federal Agency: Various Federal Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Uniform guidance requires auditees to follow procurement standards set forth. sections of the Uniform Guidance set forth five permissible procurement methods for non-Federal entities expending Federal financial assistance: (1) micro-purchases (§ 200.320(a)(1)); (2) small purchases (§ 200.320(a)(2)); (3) sealed bids (§ 200.320(b)(1)); (4) proposals (§ 200.320(b)(2)); and (5) noncompetitive procurement (§ 200.320(c)(1)-(5)). Condition: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs: None. Context: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance related to defining the required levels of procurement and when competitive bids are required. Cause: The University did not have a process in place to ensure the procurement policy met Uniform Guidance. Effect: The University is not in compliance with Uniform Guidance for procurement. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University review its procurement policy to insure it meets federal regulations. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2023 – 025 – Procurement Policy Federal Agency: Various Federal Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Uniform guidance requires auditees to follow procurement standards set forth. sections of the Uniform Guidance set forth five permissible procurement methods for non-Federal entities expending Federal financial assistance: (1) micro-purchases (§ 200.320(a)(1)); (2) small purchases (§ 200.320(a)(2)); (3) sealed bids (§ 200.320(b)(1)); (4) proposals (§ 200.320(b)(2)); and (5) noncompetitive procurement (§ 200.320(c)(1)-(5)). Condition: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs: None. Context: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance related to defining the required levels of procurement and when competitive bids are required. Cause: The University did not have a process in place to ensure the procurement policy met Uniform Guidance. Effect: The University is not in compliance with Uniform Guidance for procurement. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University review its procurement policy to insure it meets federal regulations. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2023 – 025 – Procurement Policy Federal Agency: Various Federal Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Uniform guidance requires auditees to follow procurement standards set forth. sections of the Uniform Guidance set forth five permissible procurement methods for non-Federal entities expending Federal financial assistance: (1) micro-purchases (§ 200.320(a)(1)); (2) small purchases (§ 200.320(a)(2)); (3) sealed bids (§ 200.320(b)(1)); (4) proposals (§ 200.320(b)(2)); and (5) noncompetitive procurement (§ 200.320(c)(1)-(5)). Condition: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs: None. Context: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance related to defining the required levels of procurement and when competitive bids are required. Cause: The University did not have a process in place to ensure the procurement policy met Uniform Guidance. Effect: The University is not in compliance with Uniform Guidance for procurement. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University review its procurement policy to insure it meets federal regulations. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2023 – 025 – Procurement Policy Federal Agency: Various Federal Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Uniform guidance requires auditees to follow procurement standards set forth. sections of the Uniform Guidance set forth five permissible procurement methods for non-Federal entities expending Federal financial assistance: (1) micro-purchases (§ 200.320(a)(1)); (2) small purchases (§ 200.320(a)(2)); (3) sealed bids (§ 200.320(b)(1)); (4) proposals (§ 200.320(b)(2)); and (5) noncompetitive procurement (§ 200.320(c)(1)-(5)). Condition: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs: None. Context: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance related to defining the required levels of procurement and when competitive bids are required. Cause: The University did not have a process in place to ensure the procurement policy met Uniform Guidance. Effect: The University is not in compliance with Uniform Guidance for procurement. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University review its procurement policy to insure it meets federal regulations. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2023 – 025 – Procurement Policy Federal Agency: Various Federal Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Uniform guidance requires auditees to follow procurement standards set forth. sections of the Uniform Guidance set forth five permissible procurement methods for non-Federal entities expending Federal financial assistance: (1) micro-purchases (§ 200.320(a)(1)); (2) small purchases (§ 200.320(a)(2)); (3) sealed bids (§ 200.320(b)(1)); (4) proposals (§ 200.320(b)(2)); and (5) noncompetitive procurement (§ 200.320(c)(1)-(5)). Condition: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs: None. Context: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance related to defining the required levels of procurement and when competitive bids are required. Cause: The University did not have a process in place to ensure the procurement policy met Uniform Guidance. Effect: The University is not in compliance with Uniform Guidance for procurement. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University review its procurement policy to insure it meets federal regulations. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2023 – 025 – Procurement Policy Federal Agency: Various Federal Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Uniform guidance requires auditees to follow procurement standards set forth. sections of the Uniform Guidance set forth five permissible procurement methods for non-Federal entities expending Federal financial assistance: (1) micro-purchases (§ 200.320(a)(1)); (2) small purchases (§ 200.320(a)(2)); (3) sealed bids (§ 200.320(b)(1)); (4) proposals (§ 200.320(b)(2)); and (5) noncompetitive procurement (§ 200.320(c)(1)-(5)). Condition: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs: None. Context: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance related to defining the required levels of procurement and when competitive bids are required. Cause: The University did not have a process in place to ensure the procurement policy met Uniform Guidance. Effect: The University is not in compliance with Uniform Guidance for procurement. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University review its procurement policy to insure it meets federal regulations. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2023 – 025 – Procurement Policy Federal Agency: Various Federal Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Uniform guidance requires auditees to follow procurement standards set forth. sections of the Uniform Guidance set forth five permissible procurement methods for non-Federal entities expending Federal financial assistance: (1) micro-purchases (§ 200.320(a)(1)); (2) small purchases (§ 200.320(a)(2)); (3) sealed bids (§ 200.320(b)(1)); (4) proposals (§ 200.320(b)(2)); and (5) noncompetitive procurement (§ 200.320(c)(1)-(5)). Condition: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs: None. Context: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance related to defining the required levels of procurement and when competitive bids are required. Cause: The University did not have a process in place to ensure the procurement policy met Uniform Guidance. Effect: The University is not in compliance with Uniform Guidance for procurement. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University review its procurement policy to insure it meets federal regulations. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2023 – 025 – Procurement Policy Federal Agency: Various Federal Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Uniform guidance requires auditees to follow procurement standards set forth. sections of the Uniform Guidance set forth five permissible procurement methods for non-Federal entities expending Federal financial assistance: (1) micro-purchases (§ 200.320(a)(1)); (2) small purchases (§ 200.320(a)(2)); (3) sealed bids (§ 200.320(b)(1)); (4) proposals (§ 200.320(b)(2)); and (5) noncompetitive procurement (§ 200.320(c)(1)-(5)). Condition: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs: None. Context: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance related to defining the required levels of procurement and when competitive bids are required. Cause: The University did not have a process in place to ensure the procurement policy met Uniform Guidance. Effect: The University is not in compliance with Uniform Guidance for procurement. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University review its procurement policy to insure it meets federal regulations. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2023 – 025 – Procurement Policy Federal Agency: Various Federal Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Uniform guidance requires auditees to follow procurement standards set forth. sections of the Uniform Guidance set forth five permissible procurement methods for non-Federal entities expending Federal financial assistance: (1) micro-purchases (§ 200.320(a)(1)); (2) small purchases (§ 200.320(a)(2)); (3) sealed bids (§ 200.320(b)(1)); (4) proposals (§ 200.320(b)(2)); and (5) noncompetitive procurement (§ 200.320(c)(1)-(5)). Condition: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs: None. Context: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance related to defining the required levels of procurement and when competitive bids are required. Cause: The University did not have a process in place to ensure the procurement policy met Uniform Guidance. Effect: The University is not in compliance with Uniform Guidance for procurement. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University review its procurement policy to insure it meets federal regulations. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2023 – 025 – Procurement Policy Federal Agency: Various Federal Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Uniform guidance requires auditees to follow procurement standards set forth. sections of the Uniform Guidance set forth five permissible procurement methods for non-Federal entities expending Federal financial assistance: (1) micro-purchases (§ 200.320(a)(1)); (2) small purchases (§ 200.320(a)(2)); (3) sealed bids (§ 200.320(b)(1)); (4) proposals (§ 200.320(b)(2)); and (5) noncompetitive procurement (§ 200.320(c)(1)-(5)). Condition: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs: None. Context: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance related to defining the required levels of procurement and when competitive bids are required. Cause: The University did not have a process in place to ensure the procurement policy met Uniform Guidance. Effect: The University is not in compliance with Uniform Guidance for procurement. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University review its procurement policy to insure it meets federal regulations. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2023 – 025 – Procurement Policy Federal Agency: Various Federal Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Uniform guidance requires auditees to follow procurement standards set forth. sections of the Uniform Guidance set forth five permissible procurement methods for non-Federal entities expending Federal financial assistance: (1) micro-purchases (§ 200.320(a)(1)); (2) small purchases (§ 200.320(a)(2)); (3) sealed bids (§ 200.320(b)(1)); (4) proposals (§ 200.320(b)(2)); and (5) noncompetitive procurement (§ 200.320(c)(1)-(5)). Condition: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs: None. Context: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance related to defining the required levels of procurement and when competitive bids are required. Cause: The University did not have a process in place to ensure the procurement policy met Uniform Guidance. Effect: The University is not in compliance with Uniform Guidance for procurement. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University review its procurement policy to insure it meets federal regulations. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2023 – 025 – Procurement Policy Federal Agency: Various Federal Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Uniform guidance requires auditees to follow procurement standards set forth. sections of the Uniform Guidance set forth five permissible procurement methods for non-Federal entities expending Federal financial assistance: (1) micro-purchases (§ 200.320(a)(1)); (2) small purchases (§ 200.320(a)(2)); (3) sealed bids (§ 200.320(b)(1)); (4) proposals (§ 200.320(b)(2)); and (5) noncompetitive procurement (§ 200.320(c)(1)-(5)). Condition: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs: None. Context: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance related to defining the required levels of procurement and when competitive bids are required. Cause: The University did not have a process in place to ensure the procurement policy met Uniform Guidance. Effect: The University is not in compliance with Uniform Guidance for procurement. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University review its procurement policy to insure it meets federal regulations. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2023 – 025 – Procurement Policy Federal Agency: Various Federal Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Uniform guidance requires auditees to follow procurement standards set forth. sections of the Uniform Guidance set forth five permissible procurement methods for non-Federal entities expending Federal financial assistance: (1) micro-purchases (§ 200.320(a)(1)); (2) small purchases (§ 200.320(a)(2)); (3) sealed bids (§ 200.320(b)(1)); (4) proposals (§ 200.320(b)(2)); and (5) noncompetitive procurement (§ 200.320(c)(1)-(5)). Condition: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs: None. Context: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance related to defining the required levels of procurement and when competitive bids are required. Cause: The University did not have a process in place to ensure the procurement policy met Uniform Guidance. Effect: The University is not in compliance with Uniform Guidance for procurement. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University review its procurement policy to insure it meets federal regulations. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2023 – 025 – Procurement Policy Federal Agency: Various Federal Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Uniform guidance requires auditees to follow procurement standards set forth. sections of the Uniform Guidance set forth five permissible procurement methods for non-Federal entities expending Federal financial assistance: (1) micro-purchases (§ 200.320(a)(1)); (2) small purchases (§ 200.320(a)(2)); (3) sealed bids (§ 200.320(b)(1)); (4) proposals (§ 200.320(b)(2)); and (5) noncompetitive procurement (§ 200.320(c)(1)-(5)). Condition: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs: None. Context: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance related to defining the required levels of procurement and when competitive bids are required. Cause: The University did not have a process in place to ensure the procurement policy met Uniform Guidance. Effect: The University is not in compliance with Uniform Guidance for procurement. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University review its procurement policy to insure it meets federal regulations. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2023 – 025 – Procurement Policy Federal Agency: Various Federal Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Uniform guidance requires auditees to follow procurement standards set forth. sections of the Uniform Guidance set forth five permissible procurement methods for non-Federal entities expending Federal financial assistance: (1) micro-purchases (§ 200.320(a)(1)); (2) small purchases (§ 200.320(a)(2)); (3) sealed bids (§ 200.320(b)(1)); (4) proposals (§ 200.320(b)(2)); and (5) noncompetitive procurement (§ 200.320(c)(1)-(5)). Condition: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs: None. Context: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance related to defining the required levels of procurement and when competitive bids are required. Cause: The University did not have a process in place to ensure the procurement policy met Uniform Guidance. Effect: The University is not in compliance with Uniform Guidance for procurement. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University review its procurement policy to insure it meets federal regulations. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2023 – 025 – Procurement Policy Federal Agency: Various Federal Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Uniform guidance requires auditees to follow procurement standards set forth. sections of the Uniform Guidance set forth five permissible procurement methods for non-Federal entities expending Federal financial assistance: (1) micro-purchases (§ 200.320(a)(1)); (2) small purchases (§ 200.320(a)(2)); (3) sealed bids (§ 200.320(b)(1)); (4) proposals (§ 200.320(b)(2)); and (5) noncompetitive procurement (§ 200.320(c)(1)-(5)). Condition: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs: None. Context: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance related to defining the required levels of procurement and when competitive bids are required. Cause: The University did not have a process in place to ensure the procurement policy met Uniform Guidance. Effect: The University is not in compliance with Uniform Guidance for procurement. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University review its procurement policy to insure it meets federal regulations. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2023 – 025 – Procurement Policy Federal Agency: Various Federal Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Uniform guidance requires auditees to follow procurement standards set forth. sections of the Uniform Guidance set forth five permissible procurement methods for non-Federal entities expending Federal financial assistance: (1) micro-purchases (§ 200.320(a)(1)); (2) small purchases (§ 200.320(a)(2)); (3) sealed bids (§ 200.320(b)(1)); (4) proposals (§ 200.320(b)(2)); and (5) noncompetitive procurement (§ 200.320(c)(1)-(5)). Condition: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs: None. Context: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance related to defining the required levels of procurement and when competitive bids are required. Cause: The University did not have a process in place to ensure the procurement policy met Uniform Guidance. Effect: The University is not in compliance with Uniform Guidance for procurement. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University review its procurement policy to insure it meets federal regulations. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2023 – 025 – Procurement Policy Federal Agency: Various Federal Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Uniform guidance requires auditees to follow procurement standards set forth. sections of the Uniform Guidance set forth five permissible procurement methods for non-Federal entities expending Federal financial assistance: (1) micro-purchases (§ 200.320(a)(1)); (2) small purchases (§ 200.320(a)(2)); (3) sealed bids (§ 200.320(b)(1)); (4) proposals (§ 200.320(b)(2)); and (5) noncompetitive procurement (§ 200.320(c)(1)-(5)). Condition: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs: None. Context: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance related to defining the required levels of procurement and when competitive bids are required. Cause: The University did not have a process in place to ensure the procurement policy met Uniform Guidance. Effect: The University is not in compliance with Uniform Guidance for procurement. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University review its procurement policy to insure it meets federal regulations. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2023 – 025 – Procurement Policy Federal Agency: Various Federal Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Uniform guidance requires auditees to follow procurement standards set forth. sections of the Uniform Guidance set forth five permissible procurement methods for non-Federal entities expending Federal financial assistance: (1) micro-purchases (§ 200.320(a)(1)); (2) small purchases (§ 200.320(a)(2)); (3) sealed bids (§ 200.320(b)(1)); (4) proposals (§ 200.320(b)(2)); and (5) noncompetitive procurement (§ 200.320(c)(1)-(5)). Condition: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs: None. Context: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance related to defining the required levels of procurement and when competitive bids are required. Cause: The University did not have a process in place to ensure the procurement policy met Uniform Guidance. Effect: The University is not in compliance with Uniform Guidance for procurement. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University review its procurement policy to insure it meets federal regulations. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2023 – 025 – Procurement Policy Federal Agency: Various Federal Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Uniform guidance requires auditees to follow procurement standards set forth. sections of the Uniform Guidance set forth five permissible procurement methods for non-Federal entities expending Federal financial assistance: (1) micro-purchases (§ 200.320(a)(1)); (2) small purchases (§ 200.320(a)(2)); (3) sealed bids (§ 200.320(b)(1)); (4) proposals (§ 200.320(b)(2)); and (5) noncompetitive procurement (§ 200.320(c)(1)-(5)). Condition: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs: None. Context: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance related to defining the required levels of procurement and when competitive bids are required. Cause: The University did not have a process in place to ensure the procurement policy met Uniform Guidance. Effect: The University is not in compliance with Uniform Guidance for procurement. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University review its procurement policy to insure it meets federal regulations. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2023 – 025 – Procurement Policy Federal Agency: Various Federal Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Uniform guidance requires auditees to follow procurement standards set forth. sections of the Uniform Guidance set forth five permissible procurement methods for non-Federal entities expending Federal financial assistance: (1) micro-purchases (§ 200.320(a)(1)); (2) small purchases (§ 200.320(a)(2)); (3) sealed bids (§ 200.320(b)(1)); (4) proposals (§ 200.320(b)(2)); and (5) noncompetitive procurement (§ 200.320(c)(1)-(5)). Condition: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs: None. Context: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance related to defining the required levels of procurement and when competitive bids are required. Cause: The University did not have a process in place to ensure the procurement policy met Uniform Guidance. Effect: The University is not in compliance with Uniform Guidance for procurement. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University review its procurement policy to insure it meets federal regulations. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2023 – 025 – Procurement Policy Federal Agency: Various Federal Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Uniform guidance requires auditees to follow procurement standards set forth. sections of the Uniform Guidance set forth five permissible procurement methods for non-Federal entities expending Federal financial assistance: (1) micro-purchases (§ 200.320(a)(1)); (2) small purchases (§ 200.320(a)(2)); (3) sealed bids (§ 200.320(b)(1)); (4) proposals (§ 200.320(b)(2)); and (5) noncompetitive procurement (§ 200.320(c)(1)-(5)). Condition: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs: None. Context: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance related to defining the required levels of procurement and when competitive bids are required. Cause: The University did not have a process in place to ensure the procurement policy met Uniform Guidance. Effect: The University is not in compliance with Uniform Guidance for procurement. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University review its procurement policy to insure it meets federal regulations. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2023 – 025 – Procurement Policy Federal Agency: Various Federal Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Uniform guidance requires auditees to follow procurement standards set forth. sections of the Uniform Guidance set forth five permissible procurement methods for non-Federal entities expending Federal financial assistance: (1) micro-purchases (§ 200.320(a)(1)); (2) small purchases (§ 200.320(a)(2)); (3) sealed bids (§ 200.320(b)(1)); (4) proposals (§ 200.320(b)(2)); and (5) noncompetitive procurement (§ 200.320(c)(1)-(5)). Condition: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs: None. Context: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance related to defining the required levels of procurement and when competitive bids are required. Cause: The University did not have a process in place to ensure the procurement policy met Uniform Guidance. Effect: The University is not in compliance with Uniform Guidance for procurement. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University review its procurement policy to insure it meets federal regulations. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2023 – 025 – Procurement Policy Federal Agency: Various Federal Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Uniform guidance requires auditees to follow procurement standards set forth. sections of the Uniform Guidance set forth five permissible procurement methods for non-Federal entities expending Federal financial assistance: (1) micro-purchases (§ 200.320(a)(1)); (2) small purchases (§ 200.320(a)(2)); (3) sealed bids (§ 200.320(b)(1)); (4) proposals (§ 200.320(b)(2)); and (5) noncompetitive procurement (§ 200.320(c)(1)-(5)). Condition: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs: None. Context: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance related to defining the required levels of procurement and when competitive bids are required. Cause: The University did not have a process in place to ensure the procurement policy met Uniform Guidance. Effect: The University is not in compliance with Uniform Guidance for procurement. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University review its procurement policy to insure it meets federal regulations. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2023 – 025 – Procurement Policy Federal Agency: Various Federal Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Uniform guidance requires auditees to follow procurement standards set forth. sections of the Uniform Guidance set forth five permissible procurement methods for non-Federal entities expending Federal financial assistance: (1) micro-purchases (§ 200.320(a)(1)); (2) small purchases (§ 200.320(a)(2)); (3) sealed bids (§ 200.320(b)(1)); (4) proposals (§ 200.320(b)(2)); and (5) noncompetitive procurement (§ 200.320(c)(1)-(5)). Condition: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs: None. Context: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance related to defining the required levels of procurement and when competitive bids are required. Cause: The University did not have a process in place to ensure the procurement policy met Uniform Guidance. Effect: The University is not in compliance with Uniform Guidance for procurement. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University review its procurement policy to insure it meets federal regulations. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2023-007 – Procurement, Small Purchases (Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls over Compliance, Questioned Costs Greater than $25k) Federal Program Information Federal Award Title and ALN: Research & Development Cluster, 84.031 Federal Awarding Agency: U.S. Department of Education Federal Award ID Number: P031S210288, P031C200002 Federal Award Year: 2023 Condition: During our review of procurement testing, the College did not follow small purchase procedures and obtain quotes to ensure the vendor with the lowest price was used for one sample. Criteria: Per 2 CFR 200.303(a), the non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). 2 CFR 200.320(a) sets the micro-purchase threshold at $10,000 and requires purchases over the micro-purchase threshold to use small purchase procedures, whereby price or rate quotations must be obtained. Per 2 CFR 200.318(i), non-federal entities must retain documentation sufficient to detail the history of procurement decisions. Cause: The College did not obtain three quotes prior to using vendor for a purchase. Effect: The College may unintentionally use a higher-cost vendor when failing to obtain price or rate quotations for items over the micro-purchase threshold. Questioned Costs: Known and likely questioned costs of $32,607 Auditor recommendation: We recommend the College strengthen controls to ensure purchasing policies and procedures are being followed and train staff in the purchasing department to comply with all relevant federal procurement requirements.
2023-007 – Procurement, Small Purchases (Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls over Compliance, Questioned Costs Greater than $25k) Federal Program Information Federal Award Title and ALN: Research & Development Cluster, 84.031 Federal Awarding Agency: U.S. Department of Education Federal Award ID Number: P031S210288, P031C200002 Federal Award Year: 2023 Condition: During our review of procurement testing, the College did not follow small purchase procedures and obtain quotes to ensure the vendor with the lowest price was used for one sample. Criteria: Per 2 CFR 200.303(a), the non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). 2 CFR 200.320(a) sets the micro-purchase threshold at $10,000 and requires purchases over the micro-purchase threshold to use small purchase procedures, whereby price or rate quotations must be obtained. Per 2 CFR 200.318(i), non-federal entities must retain documentation sufficient to detail the history of procurement decisions. Cause: The College did not obtain three quotes prior to using vendor for a purchase. Effect: The College may unintentionally use a higher-cost vendor when failing to obtain price or rate quotations for items over the micro-purchase threshold. Questioned Costs: Known and likely questioned costs of $32,607 Auditor recommendation: We recommend the College strengthen controls to ensure purchasing policies and procedures are being followed and train staff in the purchasing department to comply with all relevant federal procurement requirements.
2023-007 – Procurement, Small Purchases (Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls over Compliance, Questioned Costs Greater than $25k) Federal Program Information Federal Award Title and ALN: Research & Development Cluster, 84.031 Federal Awarding Agency: U.S. Department of Education Federal Award ID Number: P031S210288, P031C200002 Federal Award Year: 2023 Condition: During our review of procurement testing, the College did not follow small purchase procedures and obtain quotes to ensure the vendor with the lowest price was used for one sample. Criteria: Per 2 CFR 200.303(a), the non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). 2 CFR 200.320(a) sets the micro-purchase threshold at $10,000 and requires purchases over the micro-purchase threshold to use small purchase procedures, whereby price or rate quotations must be obtained. Per 2 CFR 200.318(i), non-federal entities must retain documentation sufficient to detail the history of procurement decisions. Cause: The College did not obtain three quotes prior to using vendor for a purchase. Effect: The College may unintentionally use a higher-cost vendor when failing to obtain price or rate quotations for items over the micro-purchase threshold. Questioned Costs: Known and likely questioned costs of $32,607 Auditor recommendation: We recommend the College strengthen controls to ensure purchasing policies and procedures are being followed and train staff in the purchasing department to comply with all relevant federal procurement requirements.
2023-007 – Procurement, Small Purchases (Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls over Compliance, Questioned Costs Greater than $25k) Federal Program Information Federal Award Title and ALN: Research & Development Cluster, 84.031 Federal Awarding Agency: U.S. Department of Education Federal Award ID Number: P031S210288, P031C200002 Federal Award Year: 2023 Condition: During our review of procurement testing, the College did not follow small purchase procedures and obtain quotes to ensure the vendor with the lowest price was used for one sample. Criteria: Per 2 CFR 200.303(a), the non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). 2 CFR 200.320(a) sets the micro-purchase threshold at $10,000 and requires purchases over the micro-purchase threshold to use small purchase procedures, whereby price or rate quotations must be obtained. Per 2 CFR 200.318(i), non-federal entities must retain documentation sufficient to detail the history of procurement decisions. Cause: The College did not obtain three quotes prior to using vendor for a purchase. Effect: The College may unintentionally use a higher-cost vendor when failing to obtain price or rate quotations for items over the micro-purchase threshold. Questioned Costs: Known and likely questioned costs of $32,607 Auditor recommendation: We recommend the College strengthen controls to ensure purchasing policies and procedures are being followed and train staff in the purchasing department to comply with all relevant federal procurement requirements.
Criteria: The acquisition of property or services which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold ($10,000 at the time of the grant in question) but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold ($250,000 established in the FAR) must follow small purchase procedures. Small purchase procedures include price or rate quotations obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. Additionally, the non-Federal entity may select noncompetitive procurement as their procurement method but must meet one of the five mentioned circumstances in 2 CFR 200.320(c). Lastly, general procurement standards must be followed. Questioned Costs: None. Repeat finding: The same finding was reported during the program specific audit as of and for the year ended December 31, 2022 as 2022-001. Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization adopt a procurement procedure in compliance with 2 CFR and ensure they have a full understanding of the required procurement policy. Views of Responsible Officials: A procurement procedure has since been adopted and approved by the Board. The Executive Director will ensure that all future purchases comply with 2 CFR. Condition: During our audit, certain grant expenditures with subcontractors, exceeding $10,000, were tested for which the Organization did not obtain quotes for. Cause: The Organization did not obtain quotes from subcontractors that were included in a contractor’s original bid. The Organization ultimately paid the subcontractors directly. Effect: The Organization did not adequately comply with 2 CFR 200.320. Non-compliance could lead to additional compliance concerns and questioned costs.
Reference Number: 2023-002 United States Department of Agriculture Federal Assistance Listing Number & Program Name: 10.553 & 10.555 Child Nutrition Cluster Description: Procurement Criteria: 2 CFR 200.320 Methods of Procurement state that if the Sealed Bids method is used - This is a procurement method in which bids are publicly solicited through an invitation and a firm fixed-price contract (lump sum or unit price) is awarded to the responsible bidder whose bid conforms to all the material terms and conditions of the invitation and is the lowest in price. The Organization’s procurement policy also states that purchases ranging from >$100,000 require a minimum of three written bids. Condition: During our testing of procurement transactions, we totaled purchases from one vendor above $100,000 in purchases had no price quotes as required by the Organization’s procurement policy. Cause: The Organization did not follow their Federal Funds Procurement policy related to the appropriate methods of procurement. Effect: Obtaining price quotes or proposals from an adequate number of vendors allows the Organization to use federal funds in the most fiscally responsible way. The lack of quotes and proposals may cause the Organization to overpay for supplies or services. Auditors’ Recommendation: We recommend the Organization review their procurement policy and adhere to current policy for going out for the minimum amount of bids on required vendors. Corrective Action Plan: See attachment for Organization’s corrective action plan.
2023-002 – Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Federal Program: Arts in Education Federal Assistance Listing Number: 84.351 Pass-through Entity: Not applicable. Award Identification Number: S351A210115 and U351D180067 Year: 2022 and 2023 Criteria: 2 CFR §200.320(b) requires that for purchases exceeding the micro-purchase threshold, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. If a noncompetitive (single-source) procurement is used, the entity must document the justification in accordance with 2 CFR §200.320(c). Condition: During testing, we identified two vendors with transactions exceeding the micro-purchase threshold. For one vendor, the Organization did not obtain competitive price or rate quotations, and for the other, the Organization did not document a valid single-source justification. Context: The procurement transactions reviewed represented the entire population of expenditures exceeding the micro-purchase threshold during the period. In both cases, the documentation did not align with competitive procurement requirements. Given that all transactions in the population were affected, this indicates an area where compliance practices could be strengthened. Cause: Although the Organization has a formal procurement policy outlining requirements for competitive quotes and single-source justifications in accordance with 2 CFR §200.320, these procedures were not followed for the transactions tested. Effect: Failure to obtain competitive quotes or document single-source justifications increases the risk of noncompliance with federal procurement requirements and may result in unallowable costs being charged to the federal program. Questioned Costs: Known questioned costs total $163,818, representing the federal share of the transactions where procurement requirements were not met. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the Organization ensure that its procurement policy is fully implemented. Staff should be trained and held accountable for obtaining competitive price or rate quotations for all purchases exceeding the micro-purchase threshold, or for documenting appropriate single-source justifications when applicable. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan.
CRITERIA: Under the Uniform Guidance, specifically 2 CFR 200.320, an organization must have and use documented procurement procedures. This includes a requirement to maintain the procurement documents. CONDITION: Formal documentation of the procurement process was unavailable for certain vendors. Management was able to provide a list of which contractors were considered for the project. CONTEXT: The Organization has undertaken several construction projects under California's Project HomeKey program, which includes Federal funds. The HomeKey program was intended to rapidly convert motels into permanent housing and management was required to select and engage architects and contractors quickly. EFFECT OR POTENTIAL EFFECT: Management was unable to produce documentation of selection of one of its general contractors. QUESTIONED COST: None RECOMMENDATION: Management was unable to produce documentation of selection of one of its general contractors. VIEWS OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS: Management should revise its documentation system to allow for centralized and accessible storage of support for its vendor procurement process.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program Name: Grants for New and Expanded Services Under the Health Center Program Assistance Listing Number: 93.224/93.527 Federal Award Identification Number: L2C42352-01-00; Award Periods: July 1, 2021 – June 30, 2023; Type of Finding: Material weakness in internal control over compliance Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.320 outlines the acceptable methods of procurement. Purchases below the simplified acquisition threshold, but above the micro-purchase threshold, require price or rate quotations to be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. Noncompetitive procurement can be used in certain circumstances however the non-Federal entity is to maintain appropriate documentation justifying the use of sole source procurement consistent with 2 CFR 200.320(c). Condition: Legacy did not maintain appropriate documentation to support the procurement method utilized for procurements selected for testing. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Context: Five (5) of five (5) procurement transactions selected for testing. Cause: Legacy did not maintain appropriate documentation based on the method of procurement utilized. Effect: Legacy may inadvertently select vendors without regard to fair competition and cost analysis. Repeat Finding: Yes. Prior Year Finding: 2022-002. Recommendation: We recommend Legacy consistently follow its established policies and procedures related to maintaining necessary documentation to support the method of procurement utilized. Legacy may also consider qualifying multiple vendors for particular goods/service and then utilizing an approved vendors list. Views of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program Name: Grants for New and Expanded Services Under the Health Center Program Assistance Listing Number: 93.224/93.527 Federal Award Identification Number: L2C42352-01-00; Award Periods: July 1, 2021 – June 30, 2023; Type of Finding: Material weakness in internal control over compliance Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.320 outlines the acceptable methods of procurement. Purchases below the simplified acquisition threshold, but above the micro-purchase threshold, require price or rate quotations to be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. Noncompetitive procurement can be used in certain circumstances however the non-Federal entity is to maintain appropriate documentation justifying the use of sole source procurement consistent with 2 CFR 200.320(c). Condition: Legacy did not maintain appropriate documentation to support the procurement method utilized for procurements selected for testing. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Context: Five (5) of five (5) procurement transactions selected for testing. Cause: Legacy did not maintain appropriate documentation based on the method of procurement utilized. Effect: Legacy may inadvertently select vendors without regard to fair competition and cost analysis. Repeat Finding: Yes. Prior Year Finding: 2022-002. Recommendation: We recommend Legacy consistently follow its established policies and procedures related to maintaining necessary documentation to support the method of procurement utilized. Legacy may also consider qualifying multiple vendors for particular goods/service and then utilizing an approved vendors list. Views of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
U.S. Department of the Treasury State of New Jersey Department of Community Affairs COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (ALN 21.027) Federal Award Number and Years: G2022-09 (03/02/2021 – 12/31/2024) Statistically Valid Sample: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample Repeat Finding: No Finding Type: Material Weakness, Material Non-compliance Criteria Reporting Per 2 CFR 200.502, the determination of when a Federal award is expended must be based on when the activity related to the Federal award occurs. Generally, the activity pertains to events that require the non-Federal entity to comply with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of Federal awards, such as: expenditure/expense transactions associated with awards including grants. Further, the Uniform Guidance compliance supplement notes, each recipient must report program outlays and program income on a cash or accrual basis, as prescribed by the federal awarding agency. Also, in accordance with the grant agreement and the reporting requirements for the State of New Jersey Department of Community Affairs, direct grants and pass-through funds are fulfilled utilizing an advanced payment method and tracking reports. The grantee shall submit quarterly financial reports, in a format to be provided by the Department, and including the number of government full-time employees responding to COVID-19 as supported by this funding. The reports are prepared and submitted to allow for relevant and reliable information to be provided to the Federal government or State of New Jersey for tracking purposes. The reports are the source documents for the grantee to prepare a schedule of expenditures of Federal awards (SEFA) for the period covered by the grantee’s financial statements in accordance with 2 CFR 200.502, Basis for determining Federal awards expended, for the SEFA. Procurement Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). Under the micro-purchase method, the aggregate dollar amount does not exceed $10,000 ($2,000 in the case of acquisition for construction subject to the Wage Rate Requirements (Davis-Bacon Act)). Small purchase procedures are used for purchases that exceed the micro-purchase amount but do not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold ($250,000). Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive quotations if the non-federal entity considers the price to be reasonable (2 CFR section 200.320(a)). If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources (2 CFR section 200.320(b)). In accordance with the grant agreement and the reporting requirements for the State of New Jersey Department of Community Affairs, recipients may use award funds to enter into contracts to procure goods and services necessary to implement one or more of the eligible purposes outlined in sections 602(c) and 603(c) of the Act and Treasury’s Interim Final Rule and Final Rule. As such, recipients are expected to have procurement policies and procedures in place that comply with the procurement standards outlined in the Uniform Guidance. Under the program, St. Joseph’s Health, Inc. must follow the procurement standards in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.327, including ensuring that the procurement method used for the contracts are appropriate based on the dollar amount and conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320. Additionally, in accordance with Federal requirements, a non-Federal entity shall maintain internal controls over Federal programs designed to provide reasonable assurance that transactions are executed in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award that could have a direct and material effect on a Federal program. Condition and Context Reporting On a quarterly basis, St. Joseph’s Health, Inc. (the System) prepares and reports to the State of New Jersey Department of Community Affairs (the Department) the program expenditures for Federal funding amounts on the tracking report of expenditures, which are then used to prepare the annual SEFA in conjunction with the general ledger detail at the end of the fiscal year. While the expenditures per the SEFA as prepared by the System was accurate and the quarterly reporting was accepted by the State, the System’s expenditures per the report of expenditures were based upon purchase order amounts, which includes expenditures that were incurred subsequent to year-end. Procurement The System has procurement policies and guidelines that are in accordance with the respective provisions of the Uniform Guidance. The System contracted with multiple vendors for several projects under the G2022-09 grant that were above the micro purchase threshold of $10,000, but below the simplified acquisition threshold of $250,000. However, the System did not obtain multiple quotes from different vendors to encourage fair competition in the market as per the System’s prescribed procurement policies and guidelines. The vendors were not suspended or debarred and the associated expenditures with these vendors incurred in fiscal year 2022 were determined to be allowable. The System’s policies and procedures to ensure compliance with the above compliance requirements did not include certain internal controls that were designed properly and operating effectively to ensure that the System’s report of expenditures submitted to the Department includes a reconciliation between incurred expenditures and purchase order balances or obtained the necessary quotes from potential bidders for procurements over the micro purchase threshold. Cause Management’s review of the submitted tracking report of expenditures did not identify the need for a reconciliation of incurred expenditures and purchase order balances reported to the Department and as such, as there is a variance between the amounts reported on the SEFA and the amounts reported to the Department on the quarterly reports of approximately $2.2 million. Additionally, they System did not retain or obtain the required documentation for procurements entered into with vendors for the grant in accordance with the System’s procurement policies and guidelines. Effect The System had a material variance in the amount of expenditures reported to the Department as compared to the SEFA, as well as did not comply with Federal regulations or its own policies and guidelines for procurement transactions and related document retention. Questioned costs None Recommendation Reporting We recommend that the System strengthen its processes and internal controls to ensure the tracking report of expenditures provided to the Department has a reconciliation of the amount of expenditures incurred in the period based upon the general ledger and accounting records, used to prepare the annual SEFA, as compared to the purchase order balances. Procurement We recommend that the System strengthen its processes and internal controls to ensure the System obtains and retains the required documentation for each procurement based upon the type of procurement and dollar thresholds. View of Responsible Official Management agrees with the auditor’s recommendation and will strengthen its processes and internal controls to ensure the report of expenditures provided to the Department has a reconciliation of the amount of expenditures incurred in the period compared to the purchase order balances. In addition, Management will strengthen its processes and internal controls to ensure the System obtains and retains the required documentation for each procurement based upon the type of procurement and dollar thresholds.