Identification of the Federal Program: Assistance Listing Number: 93.612 Assistance Listing Title: Native Hawaiian Revolving Loan Program Federal Agency: Department of Health and Human Services Pass-Through Entity: N/A Federal Award Number and Award Year: N/A Criteria or Specific Requirement (Including Statutory, Regulatory, or Other Citation): Suspension and Debarment, Non-Federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include those procurement contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All nonprocurement transactions entered into by a recipient (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. When a non-Federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the non-Federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. This verification may be accomplished by (1) checking the System for Award Management (“SAM”) Exclusions maintained by the General Services Administration and available at https://www.sam.gov/portal/public/SAM/ (Note: The OMB guidance at 2 CFR part 180 and agency implementing regulations still refer to the SAM Exclusions as the Excluded Parties List System), (2) collecting a certification from the entity, or (3) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that entity (2 CFR section 180.300). In accordance with OMB Uniform Guidance, entities under the program, including subrecipients of a state, must follow the procurement standards in 2 CFR sections § 200.318 through § 200.327, including ensuring that the procurement method used for the contracts are appropriate based on the dollar amount and conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320. C.F.R. § 200.319 prescribes that all procurement transactions for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award must be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition consistent with the standards of this section and § 200.320. Further, the non-Federal entity must ensure that all prequalified lists of persons, firms, or products which are used in acquiring goods and services are current and include enough qualified sources to ensure maximum open and free competition. Also, the non-Federal entity must not preclude potential bidders from qualifying during the solicitation period. Condition: During our audit, we noted that there was no supporting document to indicate that OHA verified the vendors in SAM to ensure that the vendors were not suspended or debarred from federally funded programs before the contract was entered into. Cause: OHA does not have policies and processes in place to check and ensure the suspension and debarment review process for vendors that provide goods or services to OHA’s programs prior to entering into a contract. Effect or Potential Effect: Without verifying whether vendors are suspended or debarred prior to the contract being awarded, OHA could be contracting with vendors that are prohibited from working on federally funded projects. Questioned Costs: None. Context: See condition above for context of the finding. Identification as a Repeat Finding, If Applicable: Not applicable. Recommendation: We recommended OHA to include SAM check in its internal control policies and procedures to incorporate the suspension and debarment verification requirements prior to awarding contracts. Views of Responsible Officials: Management concurs the finding. Refer to the separate management’s corrective action plan.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.320 requires the non-Federal entity to have and use documented procurement procedures that are consistent with the standards outlined in that section. If small purchase procedures are used, 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2) requires price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the methods prescribed by 2 CFR 200.320(b) or (c): the sealed bid method; the competitive proposals method; or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR 200.320(c)). The University has adopted a Procurement Policy for Purchases Using Federal Funds that complies with the applicable procurement requirements. If purchases are over the micro-purchase threshold of $10,000, a Vendor Justification Form (VJF) must be completed and documentation maintained to support the selection of a vendor. For procurements above the micro-purchase threshold, the VJF requires a minimum of two bids; three preferred, for competitive purchase/bid procurements or documentation supporting noncompetitive purchase/bid procurements. Condition: Procurement documentation for one vendor was not prepared, failing to support compliance with the regulations above and the University’s procurement policy. Context: We selected a non-statistical sample of three procurements out of a population of fourteen vendors with total expenditures exceeding the micro-purchase threshold during the fiscal year. For one selection, the University’s VJF documenting and approving the small purchase procurement was not prepared. Cause: Despite having established procurement policies and procedures, there was a misunderstanding regarding their application in this particular instance. Management believed that having the vendor explicitly specified in the approved grant application exempted the University from following its procurement policy. Effect: Failure to properly perform the procedures required under the procurement process resulted in noncompliance with the procurement requirement. Questioned Costs: None Identification of a repeat finding: N/A. Recommendations: We recommend the University follow their procurement policies and procedures for purchases using federal funds and maintain evidence that the required procurement procedures were completed. Views of responsible officials: The HPU Office of Sponsored Projects (OSP) will strengthen its internal control to ensure that the procurement policy for purchases using federal funds is followed and that the documents required for procurement are completed and maintained, including in circumstances where the vendor was explicitly identified in an approved grant application. The Vendor Justification Form will be enforced for all purchases meeting the specific threshold amount when procuring using federal funds.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.320 requires the non-Federal entity to have and use documented procurement procedures that are consistent with the standards outlined in that section. If small purchase procedures are used, 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2) requires price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the methods prescribed by 2 CFR 200.320(b) or (c): the sealed bid method; the competitive proposals method; or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR 200.320(c)). The University has adopted a Procurement Policy for Purchases Using Federal Funds that complies with the applicable procurement requirements. If purchases are over the micro-purchase threshold of $10,000, a Vendor Justification Form (VJF) must be completed and documentation maintained to support the selection of a vendor. For procurements above the micro-purchase threshold, the VJF requires a minimum of two bids; three preferred, for competitive purchase/bid procurements or documentation supporting noncompetitive purchase/bid procurements. Condition: Procurement documentation for one vendor was not prepared, failing to support compliance with the regulations above and the University’s procurement policy. Context: We selected a non-statistical sample of three procurements out of a population of fourteen vendors with total expenditures exceeding the micro-purchase threshold during the fiscal year. For one selection, the University’s VJF documenting and approving the small purchase procurement was not prepared. Cause: Despite having established procurement policies and procedures, there was a misunderstanding regarding their application in this particular instance. Management believed that having the vendor explicitly specified in the approved grant application exempted the University from following its procurement policy. Effect: Failure to properly perform the procedures required under the procurement process resulted in noncompliance with the procurement requirement. Questioned Costs: None Identification of a repeat finding: N/A. Recommendations: We recommend the University follow their procurement policies and procedures for purchases using federal funds and maintain evidence that the required procurement procedures were completed. Views of responsible officials: The HPU Office of Sponsored Projects (OSP) will strengthen its internal control to ensure that the procurement policy for purchases using federal funds is followed and that the documents required for procurement are completed and maintained, including in circumstances where the vendor was explicitly identified in an approved grant application. The Vendor Justification Form will be enforced for all purchases meeting the specific threshold amount when procuring using federal funds.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.320 requires the non-Federal entity to have and use documented procurement procedures that are consistent with the standards outlined in that section. If small purchase procedures are used, 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2) requires price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the methods prescribed by 2 CFR 200.320(b) or (c): the sealed bid method; the competitive proposals method; or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR 200.320(c)). The University has adopted a Procurement Policy for Purchases Using Federal Funds that complies with the applicable procurement requirements. If purchases are over the micro-purchase threshold of $10,000, a Vendor Justification Form (VJF) must be completed and documentation maintained to support the selection of a vendor. For procurements above the micro-purchase threshold, the VJF requires a minimum of two bids; three preferred, for competitive purchase/bid procurements or documentation supporting noncompetitive purchase/bid procurements. Condition: Procurement documentation for one vendor was not prepared, failing to support compliance with the regulations above and the University’s procurement policy. Context: We selected a non-statistical sample of three procurements out of a population of fourteen vendors with total expenditures exceeding the micro-purchase threshold during the fiscal year. For one selection, the University’s VJF documenting and approving the small purchase procurement was not prepared. Cause: Despite having established procurement policies and procedures, there was a misunderstanding regarding their application in this particular instance. Management believed that having the vendor explicitly specified in the approved grant application exempted the University from following its procurement policy. Effect: Failure to properly perform the procedures required under the procurement process resulted in noncompliance with the procurement requirement. Questioned Costs: None Identification of a repeat finding: N/A. Recommendations: We recommend the University follow their procurement policies and procedures for purchases using federal funds and maintain evidence that the required procurement procedures were completed. Views of responsible officials: The HPU Office of Sponsored Projects (OSP) will strengthen its internal control to ensure that the procurement policy for purchases using federal funds is followed and that the documents required for procurement are completed and maintained, including in circumstances where the vendor was explicitly identified in an approved grant application. The Vendor Justification Form will be enforced for all purchases meeting the specific threshold amount when procuring using federal funds.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.320 requires the non-Federal entity to have and use documented procurement procedures that are consistent with the standards outlined in that section. If small purchase procedures are used, 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2) requires price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the methods prescribed by 2 CFR 200.320(b) or (c): the sealed bid method; the competitive proposals method; or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR 200.320(c)). The University has adopted a Procurement Policy for Purchases Using Federal Funds that complies with the applicable procurement requirements. If purchases are over the micro-purchase threshold of $10,000, a Vendor Justification Form (VJF) must be completed and documentation maintained to support the selection of a vendor. For procurements above the micro-purchase threshold, the VJF requires a minimum of two bids; three preferred, for competitive purchase/bid procurements or documentation supporting noncompetitive purchase/bid procurements. Condition: Procurement documentation for one vendor was not prepared, failing to support compliance with the regulations above and the University’s procurement policy. Context: We selected a non-statistical sample of three procurements out of a population of fourteen vendors with total expenditures exceeding the micro-purchase threshold during the fiscal year. For one selection, the University’s VJF documenting and approving the small purchase procurement was not prepared. Cause: Despite having established procurement policies and procedures, there was a misunderstanding regarding their application in this particular instance. Management believed that having the vendor explicitly specified in the approved grant application exempted the University from following its procurement policy. Effect: Failure to properly perform the procedures required under the procurement process resulted in noncompliance with the procurement requirement. Questioned Costs: None Identification of a repeat finding: N/A. Recommendations: We recommend the University follow their procurement policies and procedures for purchases using federal funds and maintain evidence that the required procurement procedures were completed. Views of responsible officials: The HPU Office of Sponsored Projects (OSP) will strengthen its internal control to ensure that the procurement policy for purchases using federal funds is followed and that the documents required for procurement are completed and maintained, including in circumstances where the vendor was explicitly identified in an approved grant application. The Vendor Justification Form will be enforced for all purchases meeting the specific threshold amount when procuring using federal funds.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.320 requires the non-Federal entity to have and use documented procurement procedures that are consistent with the standards outlined in that section. If small purchase procedures are used, 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2) requires price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the methods prescribed by 2 CFR 200.320(b) or (c): the sealed bid method; the competitive proposals method; or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR 200.320(c)). The University has adopted a Procurement Policy for Purchases Using Federal Funds that complies with the applicable procurement requirements. If purchases are over the micro-purchase threshold of $10,000, a Vendor Justification Form (VJF) must be completed and documentation maintained to support the selection of a vendor. For procurements above the micro-purchase threshold, the VJF requires a minimum of two bids; three preferred, for competitive purchase/bid procurements or documentation supporting noncompetitive purchase/bid procurements. Condition: Procurement documentation for one vendor was not prepared, failing to support compliance with the regulations above and the University’s procurement policy. Context: We selected a non-statistical sample of three procurements out of a population of fourteen vendors with total expenditures exceeding the micro-purchase threshold during the fiscal year. For one selection, the University’s VJF documenting and approving the small purchase procurement was not prepared. Cause: Despite having established procurement policies and procedures, there was a misunderstanding regarding their application in this particular instance. Management believed that having the vendor explicitly specified in the approved grant application exempted the University from following its procurement policy. Effect: Failure to properly perform the procedures required under the procurement process resulted in noncompliance with the procurement requirement. Questioned Costs: None Identification of a repeat finding: N/A. Recommendations: We recommend the University follow their procurement policies and procedures for purchases using federal funds and maintain evidence that the required procurement procedures were completed. Views of responsible officials: The HPU Office of Sponsored Projects (OSP) will strengthen its internal control to ensure that the procurement policy for purchases using federal funds is followed and that the documents required for procurement are completed and maintained, including in circumstances where the vendor was explicitly identified in an approved grant application. The Vendor Justification Form will be enforced for all purchases meeting the specific threshold amount when procuring using federal funds.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.320 requires the non-Federal entity to have and use documented procurement procedures that are consistent with the standards outlined in that section. If small purchase procedures are used, 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2) requires price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the methods prescribed by 2 CFR 200.320(b) or (c): the sealed bid method; the competitive proposals method; or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR 200.320(c)). The University has adopted a Procurement Policy for Purchases Using Federal Funds that complies with the applicable procurement requirements. If purchases are over the micro-purchase threshold of $10,000, a Vendor Justification Form (VJF) must be completed and documentation maintained to support the selection of a vendor. For procurements above the micro-purchase threshold, the VJF requires a minimum of two bids; three preferred, for competitive purchase/bid procurements or documentation supporting noncompetitive purchase/bid procurements. Condition: Procurement documentation for one vendor was not prepared, failing to support compliance with the regulations above and the University’s procurement policy. Context: We selected a non-statistical sample of three procurements out of a population of fourteen vendors with total expenditures exceeding the micro-purchase threshold during the fiscal year. For one selection, the University’s VJF documenting and approving the small purchase procurement was not prepared. Cause: Despite having established procurement policies and procedures, there was a misunderstanding regarding their application in this particular instance. Management believed that having the vendor explicitly specified in the approved grant application exempted the University from following its procurement policy. Effect: Failure to properly perform the procedures required under the procurement process resulted in noncompliance with the procurement requirement. Questioned Costs: None Identification of a repeat finding: N/A. Recommendations: We recommend the University follow their procurement policies and procedures for purchases using federal funds and maintain evidence that the required procurement procedures were completed. Views of responsible officials: The HPU Office of Sponsored Projects (OSP) will strengthen its internal control to ensure that the procurement policy for purchases using federal funds is followed and that the documents required for procurement are completed and maintained, including in circumstances where the vendor was explicitly identified in an approved grant application. The Vendor Justification Form will be enforced for all purchases meeting the specific threshold amount when procuring using federal funds.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.320 requires the non-Federal entity to have and use documented procurement procedures that are consistent with the standards outlined in that section. If small purchase procedures are used, 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2) requires price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the methods prescribed by 2 CFR 200.320(b) or (c): the sealed bid method; the competitive proposals method; or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR 200.320(c)). The University has adopted a Procurement Policy for Purchases Using Federal Funds that complies with the applicable procurement requirements. If purchases are over the micro-purchase threshold of $10,000, a Vendor Justification Form (VJF) must be completed and documentation maintained to support the selection of a vendor. For procurements above the micro-purchase threshold, the VJF requires a minimum of two bids; three preferred, for competitive purchase/bid procurements or documentation supporting noncompetitive purchase/bid procurements. Condition: Procurement documentation for one vendor was not prepared, failing to support compliance with the regulations above and the University’s procurement policy. Context: We selected a non-statistical sample of three procurements out of a population of fourteen vendors with total expenditures exceeding the micro-purchase threshold during the fiscal year. For one selection, the University’s VJF documenting and approving the small purchase procurement was not prepared. Cause: Despite having established procurement policies and procedures, there was a misunderstanding regarding their application in this particular instance. Management believed that having the vendor explicitly specified in the approved grant application exempted the University from following its procurement policy. Effect: Failure to properly perform the procedures required under the procurement process resulted in noncompliance with the procurement requirement. Questioned Costs: None Identification of a repeat finding: N/A. Recommendations: We recommend the University follow their procurement policies and procedures for purchases using federal funds and maintain evidence that the required procurement procedures were completed. Views of responsible officials: The HPU Office of Sponsored Projects (OSP) will strengthen its internal control to ensure that the procurement policy for purchases using federal funds is followed and that the documents required for procurement are completed and maintained, including in circumstances where the vendor was explicitly identified in an approved grant application. The Vendor Justification Form will be enforced for all purchases meeting the specific threshold amount when procuring using federal funds.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.320 requires the non-Federal entity to have and use documented procurement procedures that are consistent with the standards outlined in that section. If small purchase procedures are used, 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2) requires price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the methods prescribed by 2 CFR 200.320(b) or (c): the sealed bid method; the competitive proposals method; or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR 200.320(c)). The University has adopted a Procurement Policy for Purchases Using Federal Funds that complies with the applicable procurement requirements. If purchases are over the micro-purchase threshold of $10,000, a Vendor Justification Form (VJF) must be completed and documentation maintained to support the selection of a vendor. For procurements above the micro-purchase threshold, the VJF requires a minimum of two bids; three preferred, for competitive purchase/bid procurements or documentation supporting noncompetitive purchase/bid procurements. Condition: Procurement documentation for one vendor was not prepared, failing to support compliance with the regulations above and the University’s procurement policy. Context: We selected a non-statistical sample of three procurements out of a population of fourteen vendors with total expenditures exceeding the micro-purchase threshold during the fiscal year. For one selection, the University’s VJF documenting and approving the small purchase procurement was not prepared. Cause: Despite having established procurement policies and procedures, there was a misunderstanding regarding their application in this particular instance. Management believed that having the vendor explicitly specified in the approved grant application exempted the University from following its procurement policy. Effect: Failure to properly perform the procedures required under the procurement process resulted in noncompliance with the procurement requirement. Questioned Costs: None Identification of a repeat finding: N/A. Recommendations: We recommend the University follow their procurement policies and procedures for purchases using federal funds and maintain evidence that the required procurement procedures were completed. Views of responsible officials: The HPU Office of Sponsored Projects (OSP) will strengthen its internal control to ensure that the procurement policy for purchases using federal funds is followed and that the documents required for procurement are completed and maintained, including in circumstances where the vendor was explicitly identified in an approved grant application. The Vendor Justification Form will be enforced for all purchases meeting the specific threshold amount when procuring using federal funds.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.320 requires the non-Federal entity to have and use documented procurement procedures that are consistent with the standards outlined in that section. If small purchase procedures are used, 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2) requires price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the methods prescribed by 2 CFR 200.320(b) or (c): the sealed bid method; the competitive proposals method; or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR 200.320(c)). The University has adopted a Procurement Policy for Purchases Using Federal Funds that complies with the applicable procurement requirements. If purchases are over the micro-purchase threshold of $10,000, a Vendor Justification Form (VJF) must be completed and documentation maintained to support the selection of a vendor. For procurements above the micro-purchase threshold, the VJF requires a minimum of two bids; three preferred, for competitive purchase/bid procurements or documentation supporting noncompetitive purchase/bid procurements. Condition: Procurement documentation for one vendor was not prepared, failing to support compliance with the regulations above and the University’s procurement policy. Context: We selected a non-statistical sample of three procurements out of a population of fourteen vendors with total expenditures exceeding the micro-purchase threshold during the fiscal year. For one selection, the University’s VJF documenting and approving the small purchase procurement was not prepared. Cause: Despite having established procurement policies and procedures, there was a misunderstanding regarding their application in this particular instance. Management believed that having the vendor explicitly specified in the approved grant application exempted the University from following its procurement policy. Effect: Failure to properly perform the procedures required under the procurement process resulted in noncompliance with the procurement requirement. Questioned Costs: None Identification of a repeat finding: N/A. Recommendations: We recommend the University follow their procurement policies and procedures for purchases using federal funds and maintain evidence that the required procurement procedures were completed. Views of responsible officials: The HPU Office of Sponsored Projects (OSP) will strengthen its internal control to ensure that the procurement policy for purchases using federal funds is followed and that the documents required for procurement are completed and maintained, including in circumstances where the vendor was explicitly identified in an approved grant application. The Vendor Justification Form will be enforced for all purchases meeting the specific threshold amount when procuring using federal funds.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.320 requires the non-Federal entity to have and use documented procurement procedures that are consistent with the standards outlined in that section. If small purchase procedures are used, 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2) requires price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the methods prescribed by 2 CFR 200.320(b) or (c): the sealed bid method; the competitive proposals method; or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR 200.320(c)). The University has adopted a Procurement Policy for Purchases Using Federal Funds that complies with the applicable procurement requirements. If purchases are over the micro-purchase threshold of $10,000, a Vendor Justification Form (VJF) must be completed and documentation maintained to support the selection of a vendor. For procurements above the micro-purchase threshold, the VJF requires a minimum of two bids; three preferred, for competitive purchase/bid procurements or documentation supporting noncompetitive purchase/bid procurements. Condition: Procurement documentation for one vendor was not prepared, failing to support compliance with the regulations above and the University’s procurement policy. Context: We selected a non-statistical sample of three procurements out of a population of fourteen vendors with total expenditures exceeding the micro-purchase threshold during the fiscal year. For one selection, the University’s VJF documenting and approving the small purchase procurement was not prepared. Cause: Despite having established procurement policies and procedures, there was a misunderstanding regarding their application in this particular instance. Management believed that having the vendor explicitly specified in the approved grant application exempted the University from following its procurement policy. Effect: Failure to properly perform the procedures required under the procurement process resulted in noncompliance with the procurement requirement. Questioned Costs: None Identification of a repeat finding: N/A. Recommendations: We recommend the University follow their procurement policies and procedures for purchases using federal funds and maintain evidence that the required procurement procedures were completed. Views of responsible officials: The HPU Office of Sponsored Projects (OSP) will strengthen its internal control to ensure that the procurement policy for purchases using federal funds is followed and that the documents required for procurement are completed and maintained, including in circumstances where the vendor was explicitly identified in an approved grant application. The Vendor Justification Form will be enforced for all purchases meeting the specific threshold amount when procuring using federal funds.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.320 requires the non-Federal entity to have and use documented procurement procedures that are consistent with the standards outlined in that section. If small purchase procedures are used, 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2) requires price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the methods prescribed by 2 CFR 200.320(b) or (c): the sealed bid method; the competitive proposals method; or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR 200.320(c)). The University has adopted a Procurement Policy for Purchases Using Federal Funds that complies with the applicable procurement requirements. If purchases are over the micro-purchase threshold of $10,000, a Vendor Justification Form (VJF) must be completed and documentation maintained to support the selection of a vendor. For procurements above the micro-purchase threshold, the VJF requires a minimum of two bids; three preferred, for competitive purchase/bid procurements or documentation supporting noncompetitive purchase/bid procurements. Condition: Procurement documentation for one vendor was not prepared, failing to support compliance with the regulations above and the University’s procurement policy. Context: We selected a non-statistical sample of three procurements out of a population of fourteen vendors with total expenditures exceeding the micro-purchase threshold during the fiscal year. For one selection, the University’s VJF documenting and approving the small purchase procurement was not prepared. Cause: Despite having established procurement policies and procedures, there was a misunderstanding regarding their application in this particular instance. Management believed that having the vendor explicitly specified in the approved grant application exempted the University from following its procurement policy. Effect: Failure to properly perform the procedures required under the procurement process resulted in noncompliance with the procurement requirement. Questioned Costs: None Identification of a repeat finding: N/A. Recommendations: We recommend the University follow their procurement policies and procedures for purchases using federal funds and maintain evidence that the required procurement procedures were completed. Views of responsible officials: The HPU Office of Sponsored Projects (OSP) will strengthen its internal control to ensure that the procurement policy for purchases using federal funds is followed and that the documents required for procurement are completed and maintained, including in circumstances where the vendor was explicitly identified in an approved grant application. The Vendor Justification Form will be enforced for all purchases meeting the specific threshold amount when procuring using federal funds.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.320 requires the non-Federal entity to have and use documented procurement procedures that are consistent with the standards outlined in that section. If small purchase procedures are used, 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2) requires price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the methods prescribed by 2 CFR 200.320(b) or (c): the sealed bid method; the competitive proposals method; or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR 200.320(c)). The University has adopted a Procurement Policy for Purchases Using Federal Funds that complies with the applicable procurement requirements. If purchases are over the micro-purchase threshold of $10,000, a Vendor Justification Form (VJF) must be completed and documentation maintained to support the selection of a vendor. For procurements above the micro-purchase threshold, the VJF requires a minimum of two bids; three preferred, for competitive purchase/bid procurements or documentation supporting noncompetitive purchase/bid procurements. Condition: Procurement documentation for one vendor was not prepared, failing to support compliance with the regulations above and the University’s procurement policy. Context: We selected a non-statistical sample of three procurements out of a population of fourteen vendors with total expenditures exceeding the micro-purchase threshold during the fiscal year. For one selection, the University’s VJF documenting and approving the small purchase procurement was not prepared. Cause: Despite having established procurement policies and procedures, there was a misunderstanding regarding their application in this particular instance. Management believed that having the vendor explicitly specified in the approved grant application exempted the University from following its procurement policy. Effect: Failure to properly perform the procedures required under the procurement process resulted in noncompliance with the procurement requirement. Questioned Costs: None Identification of a repeat finding: N/A. Recommendations: We recommend the University follow their procurement policies and procedures for purchases using federal funds and maintain evidence that the required procurement procedures were completed. Views of responsible officials: The HPU Office of Sponsored Projects (OSP) will strengthen its internal control to ensure that the procurement policy for purchases using federal funds is followed and that the documents required for procurement are completed and maintained, including in circumstances where the vendor was explicitly identified in an approved grant application. The Vendor Justification Form will be enforced for all purchases meeting the specific threshold amount when procuring using federal funds.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.320 requires the non-Federal entity to have and use documented procurement procedures that are consistent with the standards outlined in that section. If small purchase procedures are used, 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2) requires price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the methods prescribed by 2 CFR 200.320(b) or (c): the sealed bid method; the competitive proposals method; or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR 200.320(c)). The University has adopted a Procurement Policy for Purchases Using Federal Funds that complies with the applicable procurement requirements. If purchases are over the micro-purchase threshold of $10,000, a Vendor Justification Form (VJF) must be completed and documentation maintained to support the selection of a vendor. For procurements above the micro-purchase threshold, the VJF requires a minimum of two bids; three preferred, for competitive purchase/bid procurements or documentation supporting noncompetitive purchase/bid procurements. Condition: Procurement documentation for one vendor was not prepared, failing to support compliance with the regulations above and the University’s procurement policy. Context: We selected a non-statistical sample of three procurements out of a population of fourteen vendors with total expenditures exceeding the micro-purchase threshold during the fiscal year. For one selection, the University’s VJF documenting and approving the small purchase procurement was not prepared. Cause: Despite having established procurement policies and procedures, there was a misunderstanding regarding their application in this particular instance. Management believed that having the vendor explicitly specified in the approved grant application exempted the University from following its procurement policy. Effect: Failure to properly perform the procedures required under the procurement process resulted in noncompliance with the procurement requirement. Questioned Costs: None Identification of a repeat finding: N/A. Recommendations: We recommend the University follow their procurement policies and procedures for purchases using federal funds and maintain evidence that the required procurement procedures were completed. Views of responsible officials: The HPU Office of Sponsored Projects (OSP) will strengthen its internal control to ensure that the procurement policy for purchases using federal funds is followed and that the documents required for procurement are completed and maintained, including in circumstances where the vendor was explicitly identified in an approved grant application. The Vendor Justification Form will be enforced for all purchases meeting the specific threshold amount when procuring using federal funds.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.320 requires the non-Federal entity to have and use documented procurement procedures that are consistent with the standards outlined in that section. If small purchase procedures are used, 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2) requires price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the methods prescribed by 2 CFR 200.320(b) or (c): the sealed bid method; the competitive proposals method; or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR 200.320(c)). The University has adopted a Procurement Policy for Purchases Using Federal Funds that complies with the applicable procurement requirements. If purchases are over the micro-purchase threshold of $10,000, a Vendor Justification Form (VJF) must be completed and documentation maintained to support the selection of a vendor. For procurements above the micro-purchase threshold, the VJF requires a minimum of two bids; three preferred, for competitive purchase/bid procurements or documentation supporting noncompetitive purchase/bid procurements. Condition: Procurement documentation for one vendor was not prepared, failing to support compliance with the regulations above and the University’s procurement policy. Context: We selected a non-statistical sample of three procurements out of a population of fourteen vendors with total expenditures exceeding the micro-purchase threshold during the fiscal year. For one selection, the University’s VJF documenting and approving the small purchase procurement was not prepared. Cause: Despite having established procurement policies and procedures, there was a misunderstanding regarding their application in this particular instance. Management believed that having the vendor explicitly specified in the approved grant application exempted the University from following its procurement policy. Effect: Failure to properly perform the procedures required under the procurement process resulted in noncompliance with the procurement requirement. Questioned Costs: None Identification of a repeat finding: N/A. Recommendations: We recommend the University follow their procurement policies and procedures for purchases using federal funds and maintain evidence that the required procurement procedures were completed. Views of responsible officials: The HPU Office of Sponsored Projects (OSP) will strengthen its internal control to ensure that the procurement policy for purchases using federal funds is followed and that the documents required for procurement are completed and maintained, including in circumstances where the vendor was explicitly identified in an approved grant application. The Vendor Justification Form will be enforced for all purchases meeting the specific threshold amount when procuring using federal funds.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.320 requires the non-Federal entity to have and use documented procurement procedures that are consistent with the standards outlined in that section. If small purchase procedures are used, 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2) requires price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the methods prescribed by 2 CFR 200.320(b) or (c): the sealed bid method; the competitive proposals method; or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR 200.320(c)). The University has adopted a Procurement Policy for Purchases Using Federal Funds that complies with the applicable procurement requirements. If purchases are over the micro-purchase threshold of $10,000, a Vendor Justification Form (VJF) must be completed and documentation maintained to support the selection of a vendor. For procurements above the micro-purchase threshold, the VJF requires a minimum of two bids; three preferred, for competitive purchase/bid procurements or documentation supporting noncompetitive purchase/bid procurements. Condition: Procurement documentation for one vendor was not prepared, failing to support compliance with the regulations above and the University’s procurement policy. Context: We selected a non-statistical sample of three procurements out of a population of fourteen vendors with total expenditures exceeding the micro-purchase threshold during the fiscal year. For one selection, the University’s VJF documenting and approving the small purchase procurement was not prepared. Cause: Despite having established procurement policies and procedures, there was a misunderstanding regarding their application in this particular instance. Management believed that having the vendor explicitly specified in the approved grant application exempted the University from following its procurement policy. Effect: Failure to properly perform the procedures required under the procurement process resulted in noncompliance with the procurement requirement. Questioned Costs: None Identification of a repeat finding: N/A. Recommendations: We recommend the University follow their procurement policies and procedures for purchases using federal funds and maintain evidence that the required procurement procedures were completed. Views of responsible officials: The HPU Office of Sponsored Projects (OSP) will strengthen its internal control to ensure that the procurement policy for purchases using federal funds is followed and that the documents required for procurement are completed and maintained, including in circumstances where the vendor was explicitly identified in an approved grant application. The Vendor Justification Form will be enforced for all purchases meeting the specific threshold amount when procuring using federal funds.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.320 requires the non-Federal entity to have and use documented procurement procedures that are consistent with the standards outlined in that section. If small purchase procedures are used, 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2) requires price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the methods prescribed by 2 CFR 200.320(b) or (c): the sealed bid method; the competitive proposals method; or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR 200.320(c)). The University has adopted a Procurement Policy for Purchases Using Federal Funds that complies with the applicable procurement requirements. If purchases are over the micro-purchase threshold of $10,000, a Vendor Justification Form (VJF) must be completed and documentation maintained to support the selection of a vendor. For procurements above the micro-purchase threshold, the VJF requires a minimum of two bids; three preferred, for competitive purchase/bid procurements or documentation supporting noncompetitive purchase/bid procurements. Condition: Procurement documentation for one vendor was not prepared, failing to support compliance with the regulations above and the University’s procurement policy. Context: We selected a non-statistical sample of three procurements out of a population of fourteen vendors with total expenditures exceeding the micro-purchase threshold during the fiscal year. For one selection, the University’s VJF documenting and approving the small purchase procurement was not prepared. Cause: Despite having established procurement policies and procedures, there was a misunderstanding regarding their application in this particular instance. Management believed that having the vendor explicitly specified in the approved grant application exempted the University from following its procurement policy. Effect: Failure to properly perform the procedures required under the procurement process resulted in noncompliance with the procurement requirement. Questioned Costs: None Identification of a repeat finding: N/A. Recommendations: We recommend the University follow their procurement policies and procedures for purchases using federal funds and maintain evidence that the required procurement procedures were completed. Views of responsible officials: The HPU Office of Sponsored Projects (OSP) will strengthen its internal control to ensure that the procurement policy for purchases using federal funds is followed and that the documents required for procurement are completed and maintained, including in circumstances where the vendor was explicitly identified in an approved grant application. The Vendor Justification Form will be enforced for all purchases meeting the specific threshold amount when procuring using federal funds.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.320 requires the non-Federal entity to have and use documented procurement procedures that are consistent with the standards outlined in that section. If small purchase procedures are used, 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2) requires price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the methods prescribed by 2 CFR 200.320(b) or (c): the sealed bid method; the competitive proposals method; or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR 200.320(c)). The University has adopted a Procurement Policy for Purchases Using Federal Funds that complies with the applicable procurement requirements. If purchases are over the micro-purchase threshold of $10,000, a Vendor Justification Form (VJF) must be completed and documentation maintained to support the selection of a vendor. For procurements above the micro-purchase threshold, the VJF requires a minimum of two bids; three preferred, for competitive purchase/bid procurements or documentation supporting noncompetitive purchase/bid procurements. Condition: Procurement documentation for one vendor was not prepared, failing to support compliance with the regulations above and the University’s procurement policy. Context: We selected a non-statistical sample of three procurements out of a population of fourteen vendors with total expenditures exceeding the micro-purchase threshold during the fiscal year. For one selection, the University’s VJF documenting and approving the small purchase procurement was not prepared. Cause: Despite having established procurement policies and procedures, there was a misunderstanding regarding their application in this particular instance. Management believed that having the vendor explicitly specified in the approved grant application exempted the University from following its procurement policy. Effect: Failure to properly perform the procedures required under the procurement process resulted in noncompliance with the procurement requirement. Questioned Costs: None Identification of a repeat finding: N/A. Recommendations: We recommend the University follow their procurement policies and procedures for purchases using federal funds and maintain evidence that the required procurement procedures were completed. Views of responsible officials: The HPU Office of Sponsored Projects (OSP) will strengthen its internal control to ensure that the procurement policy for purchases using federal funds is followed and that the documents required for procurement are completed and maintained, including in circumstances where the vendor was explicitly identified in an approved grant application. The Vendor Justification Form will be enforced for all purchases meeting the specific threshold amount when procuring using federal funds.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.320 requires the non-Federal entity to have and use documented procurement procedures that are consistent with the standards outlined in that section. If small purchase procedures are used, 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2) requires price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the methods prescribed by 2 CFR 200.320(b) or (c): the sealed bid method; the competitive proposals method; or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR 200.320(c)). The University has adopted a Procurement Policy for Purchases Using Federal Funds that complies with the applicable procurement requirements. If purchases are over the micro-purchase threshold of $10,000, a Vendor Justification Form (VJF) must be completed and documentation maintained to support the selection of a vendor. For procurements above the micro-purchase threshold, the VJF requires a minimum of two bids; three preferred, for competitive purchase/bid procurements or documentation supporting noncompetitive purchase/bid procurements. Condition: Procurement documentation for one vendor was not prepared, failing to support compliance with the regulations above and the University’s procurement policy. Context: We selected a non-statistical sample of three procurements out of a population of fourteen vendors with total expenditures exceeding the micro-purchase threshold during the fiscal year. For one selection, the University’s VJF documenting and approving the small purchase procurement was not prepared. Cause: Despite having established procurement policies and procedures, there was a misunderstanding regarding their application in this particular instance. Management believed that having the vendor explicitly specified in the approved grant application exempted the University from following its procurement policy. Effect: Failure to properly perform the procedures required under the procurement process resulted in noncompliance with the procurement requirement. Questioned Costs: None Identification of a repeat finding: N/A. Recommendations: We recommend the University follow their procurement policies and procedures for purchases using federal funds and maintain evidence that the required procurement procedures were completed. Views of responsible officials: The HPU Office of Sponsored Projects (OSP) will strengthen its internal control to ensure that the procurement policy for purchases using federal funds is followed and that the documents required for procurement are completed and maintained, including in circumstances where the vendor was explicitly identified in an approved grant application. The Vendor Justification Form will be enforced for all purchases meeting the specific threshold amount when procuring using federal funds.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.320 requires the non-Federal entity to have and use documented procurement procedures that are consistent with the standards outlined in that section. If small purchase procedures are used, 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2) requires price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the methods prescribed by 2 CFR 200.320(b) or (c): the sealed bid method; the competitive proposals method; or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR 200.320(c)). The University has adopted a Procurement Policy for Purchases Using Federal Funds that complies with the applicable procurement requirements. If purchases are over the micro-purchase threshold of $10,000, a Vendor Justification Form (VJF) must be completed and documentation maintained to support the selection of a vendor. For procurements above the micro-purchase threshold, the VJF requires a minimum of two bids; three preferred, for competitive purchase/bid procurements or documentation supporting noncompetitive purchase/bid procurements. Condition: Procurement documentation for one vendor was not prepared, failing to support compliance with the regulations above and the University’s procurement policy. Context: We selected a non-statistical sample of three procurements out of a population of fourteen vendors with total expenditures exceeding the micro-purchase threshold during the fiscal year. For one selection, the University’s VJF documenting and approving the small purchase procurement was not prepared. Cause: Despite having established procurement policies and procedures, there was a misunderstanding regarding their application in this particular instance. Management believed that having the vendor explicitly specified in the approved grant application exempted the University from following its procurement policy. Effect: Failure to properly perform the procedures required under the procurement process resulted in noncompliance with the procurement requirement. Questioned Costs: None Identification of a repeat finding: N/A. Recommendations: We recommend the University follow their procurement policies and procedures for purchases using federal funds and maintain evidence that the required procurement procedures were completed. Views of responsible officials: The HPU Office of Sponsored Projects (OSP) will strengthen its internal control to ensure that the procurement policy for purchases using federal funds is followed and that the documents required for procurement are completed and maintained, including in circumstances where the vendor was explicitly identified in an approved grant application. The Vendor Justification Form will be enforced for all purchases meeting the specific threshold amount when procuring using federal funds.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.320 requires the non-Federal entity to have and use documented procurement procedures that are consistent with the standards outlined in that section. If small purchase procedures are used, 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2) requires price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the methods prescribed by 2 CFR 200.320(b) or (c): the sealed bid method; the competitive proposals method; or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR 200.320(c)). The University has adopted a Procurement Policy for Purchases Using Federal Funds that complies with the applicable procurement requirements. If purchases are over the micro-purchase threshold of $10,000, a Vendor Justification Form (VJF) must be completed and documentation maintained to support the selection of a vendor. For procurements above the micro-purchase threshold, the VJF requires a minimum of two bids; three preferred, for competitive purchase/bid procurements or documentation supporting noncompetitive purchase/bid procurements. Condition: Procurement documentation for one vendor was not prepared, failing to support compliance with the regulations above and the University’s procurement policy. Context: We selected a non-statistical sample of three procurements out of a population of fourteen vendors with total expenditures exceeding the micro-purchase threshold during the fiscal year. For one selection, the University’s VJF documenting and approving the small purchase procurement was not prepared. Cause: Despite having established procurement policies and procedures, there was a misunderstanding regarding their application in this particular instance. Management believed that having the vendor explicitly specified in the approved grant application exempted the University from following its procurement policy. Effect: Failure to properly perform the procedures required under the procurement process resulted in noncompliance with the procurement requirement. Questioned Costs: None Identification of a repeat finding: N/A. Recommendations: We recommend the University follow their procurement policies and procedures for purchases using federal funds and maintain evidence that the required procurement procedures were completed. Views of responsible officials: The HPU Office of Sponsored Projects (OSP) will strengthen its internal control to ensure that the procurement policy for purchases using federal funds is followed and that the documents required for procurement are completed and maintained, including in circumstances where the vendor was explicitly identified in an approved grant application. The Vendor Justification Form will be enforced for all purchases meeting the specific threshold amount when procuring using federal funds.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.320 requires the non-Federal entity to have and use documented procurement procedures that are consistent with the standards outlined in that section. If small purchase procedures are used, 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2) requires price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the methods prescribed by 2 CFR 200.320(b) or (c): the sealed bid method; the competitive proposals method; or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR 200.320(c)). The University has adopted a Procurement Policy for Purchases Using Federal Funds that complies with the applicable procurement requirements. If purchases are over the micro-purchase threshold of $10,000, a Vendor Justification Form (VJF) must be completed and documentation maintained to support the selection of a vendor. For procurements above the micro-purchase threshold, the VJF requires a minimum of two bids; three preferred, for competitive purchase/bid procurements or documentation supporting noncompetitive purchase/bid procurements. Condition: Procurement documentation for one vendor was not prepared, failing to support compliance with the regulations above and the University’s procurement policy. Context: We selected a non-statistical sample of three procurements out of a population of fourteen vendors with total expenditures exceeding the micro-purchase threshold during the fiscal year. For one selection, the University’s VJF documenting and approving the small purchase procurement was not prepared. Cause: Despite having established procurement policies and procedures, there was a misunderstanding regarding their application in this particular instance. Management believed that having the vendor explicitly specified in the approved grant application exempted the University from following its procurement policy. Effect: Failure to properly perform the procedures required under the procurement process resulted in noncompliance with the procurement requirement. Questioned Costs: None Identification of a repeat finding: N/A. Recommendations: We recommend the University follow their procurement policies and procedures for purchases using federal funds and maintain evidence that the required procurement procedures were completed. Views of responsible officials: The HPU Office of Sponsored Projects (OSP) will strengthen its internal control to ensure that the procurement policy for purchases using federal funds is followed and that the documents required for procurement are completed and maintained, including in circumstances where the vendor was explicitly identified in an approved grant application. The Vendor Justification Form will be enforced for all purchases meeting the specific threshold amount when procuring using federal funds.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.320 requires the non-Federal entity to have and use documented procurement procedures that are consistent with the standards outlined in that section. If small purchase procedures are used, 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2) requires price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the methods prescribed by 2 CFR 200.320(b) or (c): the sealed bid method; the competitive proposals method; or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR 200.320(c)). The University has adopted a Procurement Policy for Purchases Using Federal Funds that complies with the applicable procurement requirements. If purchases are over the micro-purchase threshold of $10,000, a Vendor Justification Form (VJF) must be completed and documentation maintained to support the selection of a vendor. For procurements above the micro-purchase threshold, the VJF requires a minimum of two bids; three preferred, for competitive purchase/bid procurements or documentation supporting noncompetitive purchase/bid procurements. Condition: Procurement documentation for one vendor was not prepared, failing to support compliance with the regulations above and the University’s procurement policy. Context: We selected a non-statistical sample of three procurements out of a population of fourteen vendors with total expenditures exceeding the micro-purchase threshold during the fiscal year. For one selection, the University’s VJF documenting and approving the small purchase procurement was not prepared. Cause: Despite having established procurement policies and procedures, there was a misunderstanding regarding their application in this particular instance. Management believed that having the vendor explicitly specified in the approved grant application exempted the University from following its procurement policy. Effect: Failure to properly perform the procedures required under the procurement process resulted in noncompliance with the procurement requirement. Questioned Costs: None Identification of a repeat finding: N/A. Recommendations: We recommend the University follow their procurement policies and procedures for purchases using federal funds and maintain evidence that the required procurement procedures were completed. Views of responsible officials: The HPU Office of Sponsored Projects (OSP) will strengthen its internal control to ensure that the procurement policy for purchases using federal funds is followed and that the documents required for procurement are completed and maintained, including in circumstances where the vendor was explicitly identified in an approved grant application. The Vendor Justification Form will be enforced for all purchases meeting the specific threshold amount when procuring using federal funds.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.320 requires the non-Federal entity to have and use documented procurement procedures that are consistent with the standards outlined in that section. If small purchase procedures are used, 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2) requires price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the methods prescribed by 2 CFR 200.320(b) or (c): the sealed bid method; the competitive proposals method; or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR 200.320(c)). The University has adopted a Procurement Policy for Purchases Using Federal Funds that complies with the applicable procurement requirements. If purchases are over the micro-purchase threshold of $10,000, a Vendor Justification Form (VJF) must be completed and documentation maintained to support the selection of a vendor. For procurements above the micro-purchase threshold, the VJF requires a minimum of two bids; three preferred, for competitive purchase/bid procurements or documentation supporting noncompetitive purchase/bid procurements. Condition: Procurement documentation for one vendor was not prepared, failing to support compliance with the regulations above and the University’s procurement policy. Context: We selected a non-statistical sample of three procurements out of a population of fourteen vendors with total expenditures exceeding the micro-purchase threshold during the fiscal year. For one selection, the University’s VJF documenting and approving the small purchase procurement was not prepared. Cause: Despite having established procurement policies and procedures, there was a misunderstanding regarding their application in this particular instance. Management believed that having the vendor explicitly specified in the approved grant application exempted the University from following its procurement policy. Effect: Failure to properly perform the procedures required under the procurement process resulted in noncompliance with the procurement requirement. Questioned Costs: None Identification of a repeat finding: N/A. Recommendations: We recommend the University follow their procurement policies and procedures for purchases using federal funds and maintain evidence that the required procurement procedures were completed. Views of responsible officials: The HPU Office of Sponsored Projects (OSP) will strengthen its internal control to ensure that the procurement policy for purchases using federal funds is followed and that the documents required for procurement are completed and maintained, including in circumstances where the vendor was explicitly identified in an approved grant application. The Vendor Justification Form will be enforced for all purchases meeting the specific threshold amount when procuring using federal funds.
Non-Federal entities other than States, including those operating Federal programs as subrecipients of States, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR 200.317 through 200.327. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable State and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-Federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR 200.320(b)(2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR 200.320(c). Non-Federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR 180.215. During testing of federal compliance, the Center was unable to provide evidence of competitive bidding of a contract nor was a copy of the final contract maintained. Further it was noted that the Center did not check the suspended or debarred list for covered transactions. The Center should implement additional procedures to ensure competitive bidding is undertaken when required and that documentation for such processes is maintained; copies of executed contracts are maintained. Further the Center should ensure that vendors are not on the suspended or debarred list.
Non-Federal entities other than States, including those operating Federal programs as subrecipients of States, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR 200.317 through 200.327. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable State and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-Federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR 200.320(b)(2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR 200.320(c). Non-Federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR 180.215. During testing of federal compliance, the Center was unable to provide evidence of competitive bidding of a contract nor was a copy of the final contract maintained. Further it was noted that the Center did not check the suspended or debarred list for covered transactions. The Center should implement additional procedures to ensure competitive bidding is undertaken when required and that documentation for such processes is maintained; copies of executed contracts are maintained. Further the Center should ensure that vendors are not on the suspended or debarred list.
Assistance Listings number and name: 10.691 Good Neighbor Authority Award numbers and year: 22-GN-11030400-027, January 14, 2022 through January 14, 2027 Federal agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Compliance requirements: Procurement Questioned costs: Unknown Condition—Contrary to federal regulations and the County’s policies and procedures, the Flood Control Department (Department) failed to consider price as a selection factor when awarding a single vendor a construction services contract for which the County paid $5,896,715 during the period July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023, which was 79.8 percent of the federal program’s expenditures. The Department evaluated the 2 bids it received but awarded the contract to the successful vendor based on its professional qualifications without considering price. Instead, the County negotiated the price of the services after the contract was awarded. Effect—There is an increased risk that the County may have overpaid for construction services, limiting the amount of federal program monies available to carry out other program objectives. Further, the Department was unable to demonstrate whether the County could have acquired these services at a lower cost. This finding could potentially affect other federal programs that the Department administers. Cause—County management reported that the Department’s program personnel misunderstood the County’s procurement policies and procedures for procuring services with federal monies, which require them to follow federal Uniform Guidance regulations and consider cost as a factor. They further explained that instead the Department followed Arizona Revised Statutes, which may be used for procuring construction contracts with State and local monies and does not use cost as a factor when selecting a vendor. Finally, the County did not have a designated person assigned to review all County procurements to verify compliance with federal regulations and the County’s policies. Criteria—Federal Uniform Guidance regulations require the County to establish and follow competitive purchasing policies and procedures that align with federal Uniform Guidance procurement standards when acquiring goods and services using federal awards (2 CFR §§200.318 through 200.327). Specifically, these regulations require that the County use a written, fixed-price contract award to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder after considering factors such as discounts, transportation costs, and life cycle costs, and only architectural/engineering services can be procured without considering price as a selection factor (2 CFR §200.320). Further, the County’s policies and procedures require that the County follow Federal Uniform Guidance procurement procedures outlined in 2 CFR §§200 when making purchases with federal monies. Finally, federal regulation requires establishing and maintaining effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that federal programs are being managed in compliance with all applicable laws, regulations, and award terms (2 CFR §200.303). Recommendations—The County should: 1. Monitor departments’ adherence to the County’s policies and procedures for purchasing goods and services using federal awards, including the departments' following Uniform Guidance 2 CFR §§200 requirements to use cost as a selection factor for awarding a construction services contract. 2. Train County departments on federal Uniform Guidance requirements and the County’s procurement policies and procedures ensuring that they understand the policies and procedures to follow when acquiring goods and services using federal awards. 3. Designate an independent person who is knowledgeable about federal requirements and the County’s procurement policies and procedures to review and approve procurements involving federal awards. The County’s corrective action plan at the end of this report includes the views and planned corrective action of its responsible officials. We are not required to audit and have not audited these responses and planned corrective actions and therefore provide no assurances as to their accuracy.
Condition: During our Procurement, Suspension and Debarment test, we found 4 instances out a sample of 51 with respect to 84.425F funds and 2 cases with respect to 84.431S on which the proper purchase method was not used by the Institution. Criteria: As per regulation, non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.320 which requires recipients to Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). Under the micro-purchase method, the aggregate dollar amount does not exceed $10,000 ($2,000 in the case of acquisition for construction subject to the Wage Rate Requirements (Davis-Bacon Act)). Small purchase procedures are used for purchases that exceed the micro-purchase amount but do not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold ($250,000). Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive quotations if the non-federal entity considers the price to be reasonable (2 CFR section 200.320(a)). If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources (2 CFR section 200.320(b)). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). Cause: The Institution followed the small purchase method for these disbursements because there are very few available providers in the island that can deliver the services required and they requested quotes from all known providers, but did not followed the seal bid, competitive proposal or non-competitive proposal (if properly documented) as required by regulations. Effect: Not following established controls could result in non-compliance of federal regulations for the program. Questioned costs: -0- Since the Institution requested quotes from all know providers no cost are questioned for this finding. Recommendation: Procedures should be monitored better so that compliance with established safeguards are followed. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Atlantic University agrees with the finding. See Corrective Action plan for the University’s Comments and plan.
Condition: During our Procurement, Suspension and Debarment test, we found 4 instances out a sample of 51 with respect to 84.425F funds and 2 cases with respect to 84.431S on which the proper purchase method was not used by the Institution. Criteria: As per regulation, non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.320 which requires recipients to Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). Under the micro-purchase method, the aggregate dollar amount does not exceed $10,000 ($2,000 in the case of acquisition for construction subject to the Wage Rate Requirements (Davis-Bacon Act)). Small purchase procedures are used for purchases that exceed the micro-purchase amount but do not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold ($250,000). Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive quotations if the non-federal entity considers the price to be reasonable (2 CFR section 200.320(a)). If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources (2 CFR section 200.320(b)). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). Cause: The Institution followed the small purchase method for these disbursements because there are very few available providers in the island that can deliver the services required and they requested quotes from all known providers, but did not followed the seal bid, competitive proposal or non-competitive proposal (if properly documented) as required by regulations. Effect: Not following established controls could result in non-compliance of federal regulations for the program. Questioned costs: -0- Since the Institution requested quotes from all know providers no cost are questioned for this finding. Recommendation: Procedures should be monitored better so that compliance with established safeguards are followed. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Atlantic University agrees with the finding. See Corrective Action plan for the University’s Comments and plan.
FINDING 2023-004 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 2022, FY 2023 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context Procurement Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000 unless a lower, more restrictive threshold is set by a non-Federal entity. As Indiana Code has set a more restrictive threshold of $150,000, informal procurement methods are permitted when the value of the procurement does not exceed $150,000. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds: micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. Fifteen purchases that fell within the small purchases threshold were identified. Three of the purchases were selected for testing. For one of the purchases tested, totaling $55,285, the School Corporation was unable to provide supporting documentation that an adequate number of quotes were obtained from qualified sources. The lack of effective internal controls and noncompliance were isolated to the one purchase noted above. Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with federal award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the SAMs exclusions, collecting a certification from that vendor, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that vendor. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 22 WABASH CITY SCHOOLS SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Upon inquiry of the School Corporation in order to review the procedures in place for verifying that a vendor with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded, the School Corporation disclosed there were no policies or procedures in place to verify if vendors were suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participation in federal awards. In fiscal year 2021-2022, one covered transaction, totaling $55,285, with one vendor was identified. In 2022-2023, four covered transactions, totaling $130,257, with two vendors were identified. All five covered transactions were selected for testing. For the three vendors, the School Corporation did not verify the vendors' suspension and debarment status prior to payment. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318 states in part: "(a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. . . . (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. . . ." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 23 WABASH CITY SCHOOLS SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases — (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, goods that fell within the small purchase threshold were not properly procured, and vendors to whom payments equal to or in excess of $25,000 were made were not verified to be not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 24 WABASH CITY SCHOOLS SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure there are appropriate procurement procedures for goods and services and contractors and subrecipients, as appropriate, are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded prior to entering into any contracts or subawards. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2023-004 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 2022, FY 2023 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context Procurement Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000 unless a lower, more restrictive threshold is set by a non-Federal entity. As Indiana Code has set a more restrictive threshold of $150,000, informal procurement methods are permitted when the value of the procurement does not exceed $150,000. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds: micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. Fifteen purchases that fell within the small purchases threshold were identified. Three of the purchases were selected for testing. For one of the purchases tested, totaling $55,285, the School Corporation was unable to provide supporting documentation that an adequate number of quotes were obtained from qualified sources. The lack of effective internal controls and noncompliance were isolated to the one purchase noted above. Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with federal award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the SAMs exclusions, collecting a certification from that vendor, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that vendor. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 22 WABASH CITY SCHOOLS SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Upon inquiry of the School Corporation in order to review the procedures in place for verifying that a vendor with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded, the School Corporation disclosed there were no policies or procedures in place to verify if vendors were suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participation in federal awards. In fiscal year 2021-2022, one covered transaction, totaling $55,285, with one vendor was identified. In 2022-2023, four covered transactions, totaling $130,257, with two vendors were identified. All five covered transactions were selected for testing. For the three vendors, the School Corporation did not verify the vendors' suspension and debarment status prior to payment. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318 states in part: "(a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. . . . (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. . . ." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 23 WABASH CITY SCHOOLS SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases — (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, goods that fell within the small purchase threshold were not properly procured, and vendors to whom payments equal to or in excess of $25,000 were made were not verified to be not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 24 WABASH CITY SCHOOLS SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure there are appropriate procurement procedures for goods and services and contractors and subrecipients, as appropriate, are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded prior to entering into any contracts or subawards. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2023-004 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 2022, FY 2023 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context Procurement Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000 unless a lower, more restrictive threshold is set by a non-Federal entity. As Indiana Code has set a more restrictive threshold of $150,000, informal procurement methods are permitted when the value of the procurement does not exceed $150,000. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds: micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. Fifteen purchases that fell within the small purchases threshold were identified. Three of the purchases were selected for testing. For one of the purchases tested, totaling $55,285, the School Corporation was unable to provide supporting documentation that an adequate number of quotes were obtained from qualified sources. The lack of effective internal controls and noncompliance were isolated to the one purchase noted above. Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with federal award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the SAMs exclusions, collecting a certification from that vendor, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that vendor. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 22 WABASH CITY SCHOOLS SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Upon inquiry of the School Corporation in order to review the procedures in place for verifying that a vendor with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded, the School Corporation disclosed there were no policies or procedures in place to verify if vendors were suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participation in federal awards. In fiscal year 2021-2022, one covered transaction, totaling $55,285, with one vendor was identified. In 2022-2023, four covered transactions, totaling $130,257, with two vendors were identified. All five covered transactions were selected for testing. For the three vendors, the School Corporation did not verify the vendors' suspension and debarment status prior to payment. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318 states in part: "(a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. . . . (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. . . ." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 23 WABASH CITY SCHOOLS SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases — (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, goods that fell within the small purchase threshold were not properly procured, and vendors to whom payments equal to or in excess of $25,000 were made were not verified to be not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 24 WABASH CITY SCHOOLS SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure there are appropriate procurement procedures for goods and services and contractors and subrecipients, as appropriate, are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded prior to entering into any contracts or subawards. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2023-004 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 2022, FY 2023 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context Procurement Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000 unless a lower, more restrictive threshold is set by a non-Federal entity. As Indiana Code has set a more restrictive threshold of $150,000, informal procurement methods are permitted when the value of the procurement does not exceed $150,000. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds: micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. Fifteen purchases that fell within the small purchases threshold were identified. Three of the purchases were selected for testing. For one of the purchases tested, totaling $55,285, the School Corporation was unable to provide supporting documentation that an adequate number of quotes were obtained from qualified sources. The lack of effective internal controls and noncompliance were isolated to the one purchase noted above. Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with federal award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the SAMs exclusions, collecting a certification from that vendor, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that vendor. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 22 WABASH CITY SCHOOLS SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Upon inquiry of the School Corporation in order to review the procedures in place for verifying that a vendor with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded, the School Corporation disclosed there were no policies or procedures in place to verify if vendors were suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participation in federal awards. In fiscal year 2021-2022, one covered transaction, totaling $55,285, with one vendor was identified. In 2022-2023, four covered transactions, totaling $130,257, with two vendors were identified. All five covered transactions were selected for testing. For the three vendors, the School Corporation did not verify the vendors' suspension and debarment status prior to payment. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318 states in part: "(a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. . . . (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. . . ." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 23 WABASH CITY SCHOOLS SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases — (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, goods that fell within the small purchase threshold were not properly procured, and vendors to whom payments equal to or in excess of $25,000 were made were not verified to be not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 24 WABASH CITY SCHOOLS SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure there are appropriate procurement procedures for goods and services and contractors and subrecipients, as appropriate, are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded prior to entering into any contracts or subawards. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2023-004 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 2022, FY 2023 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context Procurement Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000 unless a lower, more restrictive threshold is set by a non-Federal entity. As Indiana Code has set a more restrictive threshold of $150,000, informal procurement methods are permitted when the value of the procurement does not exceed $150,000. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds: micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. Fifteen purchases that fell within the small purchases threshold were identified. Three of the purchases were selected for testing. For one of the purchases tested, totaling $55,285, the School Corporation was unable to provide supporting documentation that an adequate number of quotes were obtained from qualified sources. The lack of effective internal controls and noncompliance were isolated to the one purchase noted above. Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with federal award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the SAMs exclusions, collecting a certification from that vendor, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that vendor. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 22 WABASH CITY SCHOOLS SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Upon inquiry of the School Corporation in order to review the procedures in place for verifying that a vendor with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded, the School Corporation disclosed there were no policies or procedures in place to verify if vendors were suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participation in federal awards. In fiscal year 2021-2022, one covered transaction, totaling $55,285, with one vendor was identified. In 2022-2023, four covered transactions, totaling $130,257, with two vendors were identified. All five covered transactions were selected for testing. For the three vendors, the School Corporation did not verify the vendors' suspension and debarment status prior to payment. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318 states in part: "(a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. . . . (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. . . ." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 23 WABASH CITY SCHOOLS SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases — (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, goods that fell within the small purchase threshold were not properly procured, and vendors to whom payments equal to or in excess of $25,000 were made were not verified to be not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 24 WABASH CITY SCHOOLS SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure there are appropriate procurement procedures for goods and services and contractors and subrecipients, as appropriate, are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded prior to entering into any contracts or subawards. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2023-004 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 2022, FY 2023 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context Procurement Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000 unless a lower, more restrictive threshold is set by a non-Federal entity. As Indiana Code has set a more restrictive threshold of $150,000, informal procurement methods are permitted when the value of the procurement does not exceed $150,000. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds: micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. Fifteen purchases that fell within the small purchases threshold were identified. Three of the purchases were selected for testing. For one of the purchases tested, totaling $55,285, the School Corporation was unable to provide supporting documentation that an adequate number of quotes were obtained from qualified sources. The lack of effective internal controls and noncompliance were isolated to the one purchase noted above. Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with federal award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the SAMs exclusions, collecting a certification from that vendor, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that vendor. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 22 WABASH CITY SCHOOLS SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Upon inquiry of the School Corporation in order to review the procedures in place for verifying that a vendor with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded, the School Corporation disclosed there were no policies or procedures in place to verify if vendors were suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participation in federal awards. In fiscal year 2021-2022, one covered transaction, totaling $55,285, with one vendor was identified. In 2022-2023, four covered transactions, totaling $130,257, with two vendors were identified. All five covered transactions were selected for testing. For the three vendors, the School Corporation did not verify the vendors' suspension and debarment status prior to payment. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318 states in part: "(a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. . . . (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. . . ." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 23 WABASH CITY SCHOOLS SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases — (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, goods that fell within the small purchase threshold were not properly procured, and vendors to whom payments equal to or in excess of $25,000 were made were not verified to be not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 24 WABASH CITY SCHOOLS SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure there are appropriate procurement procedures for goods and services and contractors and subrecipients, as appropriate, are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded prior to entering into any contracts or subawards. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2023-008 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 - Special Education Grants to States Assistance Listings Number: 84.027X Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): 22611-054-ARP Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 29 WABASH CITY SCHOOLS SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Condition and Context Procurement Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000 unless a lower, more restrictive threshold is set by a non-federal entity. As Indiana Code has set a more restrictive threshold of $150,000, informal procurement methods are permitted when the value of the procurement does not exceed $150,000. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds: micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. The School Corporation did not have a procurement policy that complied with the procurement standards. In addition, one purchase, totaling $75,387, was identified that fell within the small purchases threshold. The purchase was selected for testing. The School Corporation did not adequately document the history of the procurement, which would have included an awarded contract. Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with federal award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the SAMs exclusions, collecting a certification from that vendor, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that vendor. Upon inquiry of the School Corporation in order to review the procedures in place for verifying that a vendor with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded, the School Corporation disclosed there were no policies or procedures in place to verify if vendors were suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participation in federal awards. One covered transaction, totaling $75,387, was identified and selected for testing. The School Corporation did not verify the vendor's suspension and debarment status prior to payment. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The Non-Federal entity must: INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 30 WABASH CITY SCHOOLS SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318 states in part: "(a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. . . . (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. . . ." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases — (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 31 WABASH CITY SCHOOLS SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed and implemented by management of the School Corporation, which would include segregation of key functions. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, goods that fell within the small purchase threshold were not properly procured and vendors to whom payments equal to or in excess of $25,000 were not verified to be not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure the history of the procurement is maintained for goods within the small purchase threshold and ensure contractors and subrecipients, as appropriate are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded prior to entering into any contracts or subawards. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2023-008 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 - Special Education Grants to States Assistance Listings Number: 84.027X Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): 22611-054-ARP Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 29 WABASH CITY SCHOOLS SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Condition and Context Procurement Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000 unless a lower, more restrictive threshold is set by a non-federal entity. As Indiana Code has set a more restrictive threshold of $150,000, informal procurement methods are permitted when the value of the procurement does not exceed $150,000. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds: micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. The School Corporation did not have a procurement policy that complied with the procurement standards. In addition, one purchase, totaling $75,387, was identified that fell within the small purchases threshold. The purchase was selected for testing. The School Corporation did not adequately document the history of the procurement, which would have included an awarded contract. Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with federal award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the SAMs exclusions, collecting a certification from that vendor, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that vendor. Upon inquiry of the School Corporation in order to review the procedures in place for verifying that a vendor with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded, the School Corporation disclosed there were no policies or procedures in place to verify if vendors were suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participation in federal awards. One covered transaction, totaling $75,387, was identified and selected for testing. The School Corporation did not verify the vendor's suspension and debarment status prior to payment. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The Non-Federal entity must: INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 30 WABASH CITY SCHOOLS SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318 states in part: "(a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. . . . (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. . . ." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases — (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 31 WABASH CITY SCHOOLS SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed and implemented by management of the School Corporation, which would include segregation of key functions. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, goods that fell within the small purchase threshold were not properly procured and vendors to whom payments equal to or in excess of $25,000 were not verified to be not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure the history of the procurement is maintained for goods within the small purchase threshold and ensure contractors and subrecipients, as appropriate are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded prior to entering into any contracts or subawards. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2023-002 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): SY 2021-22, SY 2022-23 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 18 WASHINGTON COMMUNITY SCHOOLS, INC. SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Condition and Context An effective internal control system, which would include segregation of duties, was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Procurement Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000 unless a lower, more restrictive threshold is set by a nonfederal entity. As Indiana Code has set a more restrictive threshold of $150,000, informal procurement methods are permitted when the value of the procurement does not exceed $150,000. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. A total of four vendors were identified for procurement that fell within the small purchases range. All four vendors were selected for testing. For three of the four vendors tested, the School Corporation could not provide evidence that price or rate quotes were obtained. In addition, the School Corporation did not obtain a contract for two of three vendors as required by Indiana Code for purchases between $50,000 and $150,000. Finally, documentation detailing the history of procurement, which must include the reason for the procurement method used, was not available for audit for these vendors. Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with federal award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the SAMs exclusions, collecting a certification from that vendor, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that vendor. Upon inquiry of the School Corporation in order to review the procedures in place for verifying that a vendor with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded, the School Corporation disclosed procedures included an appendix in the contract that a vendor will sign, stating they are not suspended or debarred or the School Corporation will check the SAMs website to ensure that the vendor is not suspended or debarred. Five covered transactions that equaled or exceeded $25,000 were identified. All five transactions, totaling $3,936,236 were selected for testing. For three of the five vendors, the School Corporation had not performed procedures to ensure the vendors, paid a total of $192,750, were not suspended or debarred, or otherwise excluded or disqualified from participating in federal assistance programs or activities for suspension or debarment. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 19 WASHINGTON COMMUNITY SCHOOLS, INC. SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318 states in part: "(a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. . . . (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. . . ." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use document procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the Simplified Acquisition Threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases - (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 20 WASHINGTON COMMUNITY SCHOOLS, INC. SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed or implemented, which includes segregation of key functions, by management of the School Corporation to ensure that policies and procedures were in place related to procurement and suspension and debarment. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, vendors to whom payments equal to or in excess of $25,000 were not verified to be not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded and for small purchases an adequate number of quotes were not obtained. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions or the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure there are appropriate procurement procedures for goods and services, and that contractors and subrecipients, as appropriate, are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded prior to entering into any contracts or subawards. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2023-002 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): SY 2021-22, SY 2022-23 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 18 WASHINGTON COMMUNITY SCHOOLS, INC. SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Condition and Context An effective internal control system, which would include segregation of duties, was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Procurement Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000 unless a lower, more restrictive threshold is set by a nonfederal entity. As Indiana Code has set a more restrictive threshold of $150,000, informal procurement methods are permitted when the value of the procurement does not exceed $150,000. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. A total of four vendors were identified for procurement that fell within the small purchases range. All four vendors were selected for testing. For three of the four vendors tested, the School Corporation could not provide evidence that price or rate quotes were obtained. In addition, the School Corporation did not obtain a contract for two of three vendors as required by Indiana Code for purchases between $50,000 and $150,000. Finally, documentation detailing the history of procurement, which must include the reason for the procurement method used, was not available for audit for these vendors. Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with federal award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the SAMs exclusions, collecting a certification from that vendor, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that vendor. Upon inquiry of the School Corporation in order to review the procedures in place for verifying that a vendor with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded, the School Corporation disclosed procedures included an appendix in the contract that a vendor will sign, stating they are not suspended or debarred or the School Corporation will check the SAMs website to ensure that the vendor is not suspended or debarred. Five covered transactions that equaled or exceeded $25,000 were identified. All five transactions, totaling $3,936,236 were selected for testing. For three of the five vendors, the School Corporation had not performed procedures to ensure the vendors, paid a total of $192,750, were not suspended or debarred, or otherwise excluded or disqualified from participating in federal assistance programs or activities for suspension or debarment. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 19 WASHINGTON COMMUNITY SCHOOLS, INC. SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318 states in part: "(a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. . . . (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. . . ." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use document procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the Simplified Acquisition Threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases - (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 20 WASHINGTON COMMUNITY SCHOOLS, INC. SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed or implemented, which includes segregation of key functions, by management of the School Corporation to ensure that policies and procedures were in place related to procurement and suspension and debarment. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, vendors to whom payments equal to or in excess of $25,000 were not verified to be not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded and for small purchases an adequate number of quotes were not obtained. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions or the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure there are appropriate procurement procedures for goods and services, and that contractors and subrecipients, as appropriate, are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded prior to entering into any contracts or subawards. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2023-002 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): SY 2021-22, SY 2022-23 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 18 WASHINGTON COMMUNITY SCHOOLS, INC. SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Condition and Context An effective internal control system, which would include segregation of duties, was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Procurement Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000 unless a lower, more restrictive threshold is set by a nonfederal entity. As Indiana Code has set a more restrictive threshold of $150,000, informal procurement methods are permitted when the value of the procurement does not exceed $150,000. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. A total of four vendors were identified for procurement that fell within the small purchases range. All four vendors were selected for testing. For three of the four vendors tested, the School Corporation could not provide evidence that price or rate quotes were obtained. In addition, the School Corporation did not obtain a contract for two of three vendors as required by Indiana Code for purchases between $50,000 and $150,000. Finally, documentation detailing the history of procurement, which must include the reason for the procurement method used, was not available for audit for these vendors. Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with federal award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the SAMs exclusions, collecting a certification from that vendor, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that vendor. Upon inquiry of the School Corporation in order to review the procedures in place for verifying that a vendor with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded, the School Corporation disclosed procedures included an appendix in the contract that a vendor will sign, stating they are not suspended or debarred or the School Corporation will check the SAMs website to ensure that the vendor is not suspended or debarred. Five covered transactions that equaled or exceeded $25,000 were identified. All five transactions, totaling $3,936,236 were selected for testing. For three of the five vendors, the School Corporation had not performed procedures to ensure the vendors, paid a total of $192,750, were not suspended or debarred, or otherwise excluded or disqualified from participating in federal assistance programs or activities for suspension or debarment. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 19 WASHINGTON COMMUNITY SCHOOLS, INC. SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318 states in part: "(a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. . . . (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. . . ." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use document procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the Simplified Acquisition Threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases - (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 20 WASHINGTON COMMUNITY SCHOOLS, INC. SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed or implemented, which includes segregation of key functions, by management of the School Corporation to ensure that policies and procedures were in place related to procurement and suspension and debarment. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, vendors to whom payments equal to or in excess of $25,000 were not verified to be not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded and for small purchases an adequate number of quotes were not obtained. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions or the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure there are appropriate procurement procedures for goods and services, and that contractors and subrecipients, as appropriate, are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded prior to entering into any contracts or subawards. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2023-002 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): SY 2021-22, SY 2022-23 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 18 WASHINGTON COMMUNITY SCHOOLS, INC. SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Condition and Context An effective internal control system, which would include segregation of duties, was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Procurement Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000 unless a lower, more restrictive threshold is set by a nonfederal entity. As Indiana Code has set a more restrictive threshold of $150,000, informal procurement methods are permitted when the value of the procurement does not exceed $150,000. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. A total of four vendors were identified for procurement that fell within the small purchases range. All four vendors were selected for testing. For three of the four vendors tested, the School Corporation could not provide evidence that price or rate quotes were obtained. In addition, the School Corporation did not obtain a contract for two of three vendors as required by Indiana Code for purchases between $50,000 and $150,000. Finally, documentation detailing the history of procurement, which must include the reason for the procurement method used, was not available for audit for these vendors. Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with federal award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the SAMs exclusions, collecting a certification from that vendor, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that vendor. Upon inquiry of the School Corporation in order to review the procedures in place for verifying that a vendor with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded, the School Corporation disclosed procedures included an appendix in the contract that a vendor will sign, stating they are not suspended or debarred or the School Corporation will check the SAMs website to ensure that the vendor is not suspended or debarred. Five covered transactions that equaled or exceeded $25,000 were identified. All five transactions, totaling $3,936,236 were selected for testing. For three of the five vendors, the School Corporation had not performed procedures to ensure the vendors, paid a total of $192,750, were not suspended or debarred, or otherwise excluded or disqualified from participating in federal assistance programs or activities for suspension or debarment. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 19 WASHINGTON COMMUNITY SCHOOLS, INC. SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318 states in part: "(a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. . . . (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. . . ." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use document procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the Simplified Acquisition Threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases - (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 20 WASHINGTON COMMUNITY SCHOOLS, INC. SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed or implemented, which includes segregation of key functions, by management of the School Corporation to ensure that policies and procedures were in place related to procurement and suspension and debarment. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, vendors to whom payments equal to or in excess of $25,000 were not verified to be not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded and for small purchases an adequate number of quotes were not obtained. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions or the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure there are appropriate procurement procedures for goods and services, and that contractors and subrecipients, as appropriate, are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded prior to entering into any contracts or subawards. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2023-002 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): SY 2021-22, SY 2022-23 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 18 WASHINGTON COMMUNITY SCHOOLS, INC. SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Condition and Context An effective internal control system, which would include segregation of duties, was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Procurement Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000 unless a lower, more restrictive threshold is set by a nonfederal entity. As Indiana Code has set a more restrictive threshold of $150,000, informal procurement methods are permitted when the value of the procurement does not exceed $150,000. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. A total of four vendors were identified for procurement that fell within the small purchases range. All four vendors were selected for testing. For three of the four vendors tested, the School Corporation could not provide evidence that price or rate quotes were obtained. In addition, the School Corporation did not obtain a contract for two of three vendors as required by Indiana Code for purchases between $50,000 and $150,000. Finally, documentation detailing the history of procurement, which must include the reason for the procurement method used, was not available for audit for these vendors. Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with federal award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the SAMs exclusions, collecting a certification from that vendor, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that vendor. Upon inquiry of the School Corporation in order to review the procedures in place for verifying that a vendor with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded, the School Corporation disclosed procedures included an appendix in the contract that a vendor will sign, stating they are not suspended or debarred or the School Corporation will check the SAMs website to ensure that the vendor is not suspended or debarred. Five covered transactions that equaled or exceeded $25,000 were identified. All five transactions, totaling $3,936,236 were selected for testing. For three of the five vendors, the School Corporation had not performed procedures to ensure the vendors, paid a total of $192,750, were not suspended or debarred, or otherwise excluded or disqualified from participating in federal assistance programs or activities for suspension or debarment. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 19 WASHINGTON COMMUNITY SCHOOLS, INC. SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318 states in part: "(a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. . . . (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. . . ." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use document procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the Simplified Acquisition Threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases - (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 20 WASHINGTON COMMUNITY SCHOOLS, INC. SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed or implemented, which includes segregation of key functions, by management of the School Corporation to ensure that policies and procedures were in place related to procurement and suspension and debarment. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, vendors to whom payments equal to or in excess of $25,000 were not verified to be not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded and for small purchases an adequate number of quotes were not obtained. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions or the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure there are appropriate procurement procedures for goods and services, and that contractors and subrecipients, as appropriate, are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded prior to entering into any contracts or subawards. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2023-002 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): SY 2021-22, SY 2022-23 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 18 WASHINGTON COMMUNITY SCHOOLS, INC. SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Condition and Context An effective internal control system, which would include segregation of duties, was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Procurement Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000 unless a lower, more restrictive threshold is set by a nonfederal entity. As Indiana Code has set a more restrictive threshold of $150,000, informal procurement methods are permitted when the value of the procurement does not exceed $150,000. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. A total of four vendors were identified for procurement that fell within the small purchases range. All four vendors were selected for testing. For three of the four vendors tested, the School Corporation could not provide evidence that price or rate quotes were obtained. In addition, the School Corporation did not obtain a contract for two of three vendors as required by Indiana Code for purchases between $50,000 and $150,000. Finally, documentation detailing the history of procurement, which must include the reason for the procurement method used, was not available for audit for these vendors. Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with federal award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the SAMs exclusions, collecting a certification from that vendor, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that vendor. Upon inquiry of the School Corporation in order to review the procedures in place for verifying that a vendor with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded, the School Corporation disclosed procedures included an appendix in the contract that a vendor will sign, stating they are not suspended or debarred or the School Corporation will check the SAMs website to ensure that the vendor is not suspended or debarred. Five covered transactions that equaled or exceeded $25,000 were identified. All five transactions, totaling $3,936,236 were selected for testing. For three of the five vendors, the School Corporation had not performed procedures to ensure the vendors, paid a total of $192,750, were not suspended or debarred, or otherwise excluded or disqualified from participating in federal assistance programs or activities for suspension or debarment. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 19 WASHINGTON COMMUNITY SCHOOLS, INC. SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318 states in part: "(a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. . . . (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. . . ." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use document procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the Simplified Acquisition Threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases - (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 20 WASHINGTON COMMUNITY SCHOOLS, INC. SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed or implemented, which includes segregation of key functions, by management of the School Corporation to ensure that policies and procedures were in place related to procurement and suspension and debarment. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, vendors to whom payments equal to or in excess of $25,000 were not verified to be not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded and for small purchases an adequate number of quotes were not obtained. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions or the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure there are appropriate procurement procedures for goods and services, and that contractors and subrecipients, as appropriate, are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded prior to entering into any contracts or subawards. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
CONDITION: The Western Beaver County School District contracted with two (2) third-party vendors – CCL Technologies and AVI-SPL LLC for the purchase of technology equipment. The contracts were procured through a cooperative purchasing group. The District 1) was unable to provide documentation from the cooperative purchasing group to verify that the technology procurement contracts were competitively procured, such as a bid evaluation and public solicitation and 2) did not obtain the adequate number of price or rate quotations. CRITERIA: As specified in 2 CFR 200. 318(i) of the Uniform Guidance, the District must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. In addition, small purchase procedures per 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2)(i) for acquisitions between the micro-purchase threshold (currently $10,000) and the simplified acquisition threshold (current $250,000), price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate. Per 24 PS 8.807.1, there should be three quotes that are either written or well documented. CAUSE: School District personnel directly responsible for the oversight and execution of the technology contracts interpreted that the requirements specified by 2 CFR 200.318(i) and 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2)(i), would be met through the cooperative purchasing, however the District appears to not have received and maintained all of the specific history of procurement documents internally, as referenced under the criteria section, to support this compliance. In addition, the District did not maintain documentation to substantiate that an adequate number of price quotations were solicited. EFFECT: The Western Beaver County School District did not comply with the requirements of 2 CFR 200.318(i) and 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2)(i) of the Uniform Guidance, regarding maintaining records sufficient to detail the history of procurement for the technology equipment. In addition, the District did not comply with 24 PS 8.807.1 regarding maintaining documentation to substantiate that an adequate number of price quotations for the technology equipment. QUESTIONED COST: $152,796 (CCL Technologies), $121,290 (AVI-SPL LLC) RECOMMENDATION: I am recommending that the management of the School District review and update as necessary its procurement policies to ensure retention of the appropriate procurement documentation, in all instances, including such instances whereby the District is using a contract vehicle from a cooperative purchase network so as to comply with all applicable sections of the Uniform Guidance, specifically Section 2 CFR 200.318(i) and 2 CFR.320(a)(2)(i) of the Uniform Guidance. In addition, it is recommended that the District document its attempts to obtain an adequate number of price or rate quotations as specified by 24 PS 8.807.1 over the $10,000 expenditure threshold. VIEWS OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS: Management of the School District has reviewed the above noted finding and recommendation and have developed a corresponding ‘Corrective Action Plan’ to address this matter (See Corrective Action Plan).
CONDITION: The Beaver County Career and Technical School contracted with a third-party vendor – Huckstein Mechanical for upgrades to the HVAC system at the Center. The contract was procured through a cooperative purchasing group. The Center 1) was unable to provide documentation from the cooperative purchasing group to verify that the HVAC system upgrade contract was competitively procured, such as a bid evaluation and public solicitation and 2) did not obtain the adequate number of price or rate quotations. CRITERIA: As specified in 2 CFR 200. 318(i) of the Uniform Guidance, the Center must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. In addition, small purchase procedures per 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2)(i) for acquisitions between the micro-purchase threshold (currently $10,000) and the simplified acquisition threshold (current $250,000), price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate. Per 24 PS 8.807.1, there should be three quotes that are either written or well documented. CAUSE: Center personnel directly responsible for the oversight and execution of the HVAC upgrade contract interpreted that the requirements specified by 2 CFR 200.318(i) and 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2)(i), would be met through the cooperative purchasing, however the Center appears to not have received and maintained all of the specific history of procurement documents internally, as referenced under the criteria section, to support this compliance. In addition, the Center did not maintain documentation to substantiate that an adequate number of price quotations were solicited. EFFECT: The Beaver County Career and Technical Center did not comply with the requirements of 2 CFR 200.318(i) and 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2)(i) of the Uniform Guidance, regarding maintaining records sufficient to detail the history of procurement for the HVAC upgrade project. In addition, the Center did not comply with 24 PS 8.807.1 regarding maintaining documentation to substantiate that an adequate number of price quotations for the HVAC upgrade project. QUESTIONED COST: $547,457 RECOMMENDATION: I am recommending that the management of the Center review and update as necessary its procurement policies to ensure retention of the appropriate procurement documentation, in all instances, including such instances whereby the Center is using a contract vehicle from a cooperative purchase network so as to comply with all applicable sections of the Uniform Guidance, specifically Section 2 CFR 200.318(i) and 2 CFR.320(a)(2)(i) of the Uniform Guidance. In addition, it is recommended that the Center document its attempts to obtain an adequate number of price or rate quotations as specified by 24 PS 8.807.1 over the $10,000 expenditure threshold. VIEWS OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS: Management of the Center has reviewed the above noted finding and recommendation and have developed a corresponding ‘Corrective Action Plan’ to address this matter (See Corrective Action Plan).
CONDITION: During my review of The School District of the City of Jeannette’s compliance with the requirements of the Public School Code and the Uniform Guidance for procurement of goods and services, the District was unable to provide documentation or other evidence that either 1) three price or rate quotations for the purchase of goods between $10,000 and $22,500, and services between $10,000 and $250,000 were obtained, or 2) the vendor met the requirements of a ‘sole source provider’ with documentation to support such designation, for the following vendors – Grade Point Resources ($74,503.17) and VLN Partners, LLP ($52,750.00). CRITERIA: In accordance with 24 PA Statute 8.807.1, the District must obtain/document at least three (3) written or well documented price or rate quotations from a reasonable number of qualified sources for purchases of goods between $10,000 and $$22,500 (threshold established annually). In addition, Section 2 CFR 200.300(a)(2)(i) of the Uniform Guidance requires price or rate quotations to be received from an adequate number of qualified sources for purchases above the micro purchase threshold of $10,000 and the simplified acquisition threshold of $250,000. Furthermore, Section 2 CFR 200.320(c’) of the Uniform Guidance details five (5) circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. EFFECT: The District did not comply with 1) the District’s Procurement Policy for Federal Programs (#626), 2) the 24 PA Statute 8.807.1, 3) Section 2 CFR 200.300(a)(2)(i) of the Uniform Guidance regarding obtaining three price or rate quotations for the purchase of goods between $10,000 and $22,500, and services between $10,000 and $250,000, or 4) Section 2 CFR 200.318(i) and Section 2CFR 200.320(c’) of the Uniform Guidance regarding the proper documentation required for noncompetitive procurement using federal funding. QUESTIONED COST: $127,253 CAUSE: District officials responsible for federal procurement did not adhere to District, state and federal policies and regulations regarding the expenditure of federal funds. RECOMMENDATION: I recommend that for all future purchases of goods and/or services utilizing federal funds, that the District adhere to the requirements of 1) the District’s Procurement Policy for Federal Programs (#626.5), 2) the 24 PA Statute 8.807.1, 3) Section 2 CFR 200.300(a)(2)(i) of the Uniform Guidance regarding obtaining three price or rate quotations for the purchase of goods between $10,000 and $22,500, and services between $10,000 and $250,000, and as applicable, 4) Section 2 CFR 200.318(i) and Section 2CFR 200.320(c’) of the Uniform Guidance regarding the proper documentation required for noncompetitive procurement using federal funding. VIEWS OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS: The School District concurs with the above noted finding and addresses this issue in the ‘Corrective Action Plan’ included within this report.
Criteria or Specific Requirement (Written Procurement Policies and Procedures): Uniform Guidance requires nonfederal entities to have written policies and procedures regarding procurement under federal awards. Regarding this requirements, 2 CFR § 200.318(a), states: “The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327.” Condition: We requested the District’s procurement policies and procedures. The District provided “POLICY 3170.” This policy includes general provisions in only a few areas: (1) purchases under or equal to $1000; (2) purchases from $1000 to $20,000; (3) purchases over $20,000; (4) provision for local preference; and (5) provision for vehicle purchases. POLICY 3170 does not appear to deal with procurement for federal grants or Uniform Guidance 2 CFR §§ 200.317 through 200.327. The District provided evidence of its intent to adopt new procurement policies and procedures. This is certainly a positive occurrence, but revision to the policies should have, instead, occurred prior to the beginning of the audit year 2022-2023. Cause: It appears that the primary cause of this condition is that the District does not have experience with procurement procedures under Uniform Guidance. Indeed, the District has not been required to have a Single Audit since the fiscal year ending June 30, 2013. Effect: Procurement policies and procedures are the base of internal control for procurement. Without adoption of procurement policies and procedures, non-compliance with procurement requirements is significantly more likely. Questioned costs: No costs are questioned. Perspective: The situation is somewhat offset by the fact that the District hired outside construction managers on both projects who were both experienced in federal grants and sewer projects. Further, despite the lack of appropriate Uniform Guidance procurement policies and procedures, the District did comply with most provisions of 2 CFR §§ 200.317 through 200.327. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We would recommend that the District move forward with drafting procurement, debarment, and further conflict of interest policies and procedures for federal awards. We recommend that the District review 2 CFR §§ 200.317 through 200.327 and make sure that each requirement is dealt with in the District’s new policies and procedures. It is noted that for purchases up to the Micro-purchase amount of $10,000, that competitive price or even rate quotes are not necessary as long as the non-Federal entity considers the price to be reasonable based on research, experience, purchase history or other information and documents it files accordingly. 2 CFR § 200.320(a)(1). Views of responsible officials: Management’s response is reported in “Management’s Response and Corrective Action Plan” included in a separate section at the end of this report.
Criteria or Specific Requirement (Written Procurement Policies and Procedures): Uniform Guidance requires nonfederal entities to have written policies and procedures regarding procurement under federal awards. Regarding this requirements, 2 CFR § 200.318(a), states: “The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327.” Condition: We requested the District’s procurement policies and procedures. The District provided “POLICY 3170.” This policy includes general provisions in only a few areas: (1) purchases under or equal to $1000; (2) purchases from $1000 to $20,000; (3) purchases over $20,000; (4) provision for local preference; and (5) provision for vehicle purchases. POLICY 3170 does not appear to deal with procurement for federal grants or Uniform Guidance 2 CFR §§ 200.317 through 200.327. The District provided evidence of its intent to adopt new procurement policies and procedures. This is certainly a positive occurrence, but revision to the policies should have, instead, occurred prior to the beginning of the audit year 2022-2023. Cause: It appears that the primary cause of this condition is that the District does not have experience with procurement procedures under Uniform Guidance. Indeed, the District has not been required to have a Single Audit since the fiscal year ending June 30, 2013. Effect: Procurement policies and procedures are the base of internal control for procurement. Without adoption of procurement policies and procedures, non-compliance with procurement requirements is significantly more likely. Questioned costs: No costs are questioned. Perspective: The situation is somewhat offset by the fact that the District hired outside construction managers on both projects who were both experienced in federal grants and sewer projects. Further, despite the lack of appropriate Uniform Guidance procurement policies and procedures, the District did comply with most provisions of 2 CFR §§ 200.317 through 200.327. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We would recommend that the District move forward with drafting procurement, debarment, and further conflict of interest policies and procedures for federal awards. We recommend that the District review 2 CFR §§ 200.317 through 200.327 and make sure that each requirement is dealt with in the District’s new policies and procedures. It is noted that for purchases up to the Micro-purchase amount of $10,000, that competitive price or even rate quotes are not necessary as long as the non-Federal entity considers the price to be reasonable based on research, experience, purchase history or other information and documents it files accordingly. 2 CFR § 200.320(a)(1). Views of responsible officials: Management’s response is reported in “Management’s Response and Corrective Action Plan” included in a separate section at the end of this report.
Criteria or Specific Requirement (Documentation of Procurement File): Uniform Guidance under 2 CFR 200.318(i), provides that a “nonfederal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement.” These records shall include: “rationale for the method of procurement, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price.” Further, Uniform Guidance contains procurement requirements for architectural and engineering services under 200.320(b)(2)(iv). Such policies and procedures for architectural and engineering services provide that competitive proposals for professional services whereby offeror's qualifications are evaluated and the most qualified offeror is selected, subject to negotiation of fair and reasonable compensation.” Condition: Capitalization Grants for Clean Water State Revolving Funds, CFDA 66.458: The engineer/construction manager on this project was selected for testing from a population of two vendors over the individually significant threshold of $47,219. The District explains that the District and the engineer/construction manager have a relationship which goes back 60 years. This engineering firm acts as the outside engineer for the District. The District further explains that this engineering firm has successfully completed numerous similar, smaller scale projects for the District and that this engineer is very familiar with the District’s existing system. The District further explains that these criteria were important considerations in selection this engineering firm for engineering services and construction management. We inquired about documentation of the rationale for the method of procurement, basis of contract price and negotiation of fair and reasonable compensation. The District’s file did not contain documentation of such. Water and Waste Disposal Systems for Rural Communities, CFDA 10.760: We selected a sample of three from a population of five vendors over the individually significant threshold of $29,516 for this grant. We noted one exception. The District explained the rationale for the vendor selection stating that unique construction material had to match other such construction material previously installed. However, the District did not have documentation of the rational for selection and negotiation of the price in the procurement file. Cause: It appears that the primary cause of this condition is that the District does not have experience with procurement procedures under Uniform Guidance. Indeed, the District has not been required to have a Single Audit since the fiscal year ending June 30, 2013. Effect: Without a document which shows a rational for selection of, and arrival at the price, there is no way to monitor this aspect of the procurement process. Questioned costs: No costs are questioned. Perspective: We noted extensive documentation of the general contractor procurement with bidding procedures, advertising for bids, etc. In all tests, the District’s explanations as to why a particular vendor was selected appeared reasonable. Nonetheless, the requirement is that the District document the “rationale for the method of procurement, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price.” Perspective Specific to CFDA 10.760. A sample of three was selected from a population of five vendors over the micro-purchase threshold of $10,000. There was one exception. Under attribute sampling, this is an exception rate of 33%. However, we note that the one exception represented only 1.37% of the dollar value of sample selected. Extrapolating the 1.37% to the population, the expected dollar error for debarment checks is $30,353. Perspective Specific to CFDA 66.458: Initially, we noted that the population was two vendors over the micro-purchase threshold of $10,000. We selected a sample of one with no exceptions. However, it came to our attention that grantor had questioned procurement procedures for the engineer. We determined to test this procurement and noted an exception. Under attribute sampling, this is an exception rate of 50%. However, we note that the one exception represented 19.38% of the dollar value of the total population. As 100% of the population of two was tested, no extrapolation is suggested. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We would recommend that the District adopt policies and procedures under 2 CFR 200.318(i) and 200.320(b)(2)(iv) requiring documentation of procurement “rationale for the method of procurement, . . . contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price and also negotiation of fair and reasonable compensation when architectural or engineering services are procured. Further, we recommend that a monitoring procedure be implemented to review for compliance with these procedures. Views of responsible officials: Management’s response is reported in “Management’s Response and Corrective Action Plan” included in a separate section at the end of this report.
Criteria or Specific Requirement (Documentation of Procurement File): Uniform Guidance under 2 CFR 200.318(i), provides that a “nonfederal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement.” These records shall include: “rationale for the method of procurement, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price.” Further, Uniform Guidance contains procurement requirements for architectural and engineering services under 200.320(b)(2)(iv). Such policies and procedures for architectural and engineering services provide that competitive proposals for professional services whereby offeror's qualifications are evaluated and the most qualified offeror is selected, subject to negotiation of fair and reasonable compensation.” Condition: Capitalization Grants for Clean Water State Revolving Funds, CFDA 66.458: The engineer/construction manager on this project was selected for testing from a population of two vendors over the individually significant threshold of $47,219. The District explains that the District and the engineer/construction manager have a relationship which goes back 60 years. This engineering firm acts as the outside engineer for the District. The District further explains that this engineering firm has successfully completed numerous similar, smaller scale projects for the District and that this engineer is very familiar with the District’s existing system. The District further explains that these criteria were important considerations in selection this engineering firm for engineering services and construction management. We inquired about documentation of the rationale for the method of procurement, basis of contract price and negotiation of fair and reasonable compensation. The District’s file did not contain documentation of such. Water and Waste Disposal Systems for Rural Communities, CFDA 10.760: We selected a sample of three from a population of five vendors over the individually significant threshold of $29,516 for this grant. We noted one exception. The District explained the rationale for the vendor selection stating that unique construction material had to match other such construction material previously installed. However, the District did not have documentation of the rational for selection and negotiation of the price in the procurement file. Cause: It appears that the primary cause of this condition is that the District does not have experience with procurement procedures under Uniform Guidance. Indeed, the District has not been required to have a Single Audit since the fiscal year ending June 30, 2013. Effect: Without a document which shows a rational for selection of, and arrival at the price, there is no way to monitor this aspect of the procurement process. Questioned costs: No costs are questioned. Perspective: We noted extensive documentation of the general contractor procurement with bidding procedures, advertising for bids, etc. In all tests, the District’s explanations as to why a particular vendor was selected appeared reasonable. Nonetheless, the requirement is that the District document the “rationale for the method of procurement, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price.” Perspective Specific to CFDA 10.760. A sample of three was selected from a population of five vendors over the micro-purchase threshold of $10,000. There was one exception. Under attribute sampling, this is an exception rate of 33%. However, we note that the one exception represented only 1.37% of the dollar value of sample selected. Extrapolating the 1.37% to the population, the expected dollar error for debarment checks is $30,353. Perspective Specific to CFDA 66.458: Initially, we noted that the population was two vendors over the micro-purchase threshold of $10,000. We selected a sample of one with no exceptions. However, it came to our attention that grantor had questioned procurement procedures for the engineer. We determined to test this procurement and noted an exception. Under attribute sampling, this is an exception rate of 50%. However, we note that the one exception represented 19.38% of the dollar value of the total population. As 100% of the population of two was tested, no extrapolation is suggested. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We would recommend that the District adopt policies and procedures under 2 CFR 200.318(i) and 200.320(b)(2)(iv) requiring documentation of procurement “rationale for the method of procurement, . . . contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price and also negotiation of fair and reasonable compensation when architectural or engineering services are procured. Further, we recommend that a monitoring procedure be implemented to review for compliance with these procedures. Views of responsible officials: Management’s response is reported in “Management’s Response and Corrective Action Plan” included in a separate section at the end of this report.