2 CFR § 3474.1 gives regulatory effect to the Department of Education for 2 CFR part 200 of the Uniform Guidance. 2 CFR §§ 200.318 through 200.326 of the Uniform Guidance outline procurement requirements for all non-payroll direct expenditures. Entities expending federal monies are required to follow Uniform Guidance procurement standards. 2 CFR 200.318(i) states that the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. The School District considered the contracts with Educational Service Centers to be noncompetitive procurements; however, the School District was unable to provide documentation that they met the criteria established in 2 CFR 200.320(c) to be considered as such. Due to a lack of internal controls over federal procurement documentation, the District did not properly maintain required supporting documentation. Failure to follow federal procurement standards, may result in the misuse of public funds, loss of "low risk auditee" status, increased audit expenses, loss of future federal awards, findings for recovery or other audit adjustments. The School District should review and follow the established Procurement policy to ensure proper procurement procedures are followed and sufficiently documented.
Under 2 CFR 200.318-326, non-federal entities must adhere to procurement standards for purchases made with federal funds. Key requirements include: - Full and Open Competition: Procurement transactions must be conducted to ensure open competition and prevent practices that may unduly restrict competition (2 CFR 200.319(a)). - Documentation of Procurement History: Entities must maintain records that detail the procurement history, including the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price (2 CFR 200.318(i)). - Use of Non-Competitive Procurement: Non-competitive procurement is only allowed under limited circumstances, such as when the item is available from a single source, there is a public emergency, or after solicitation of multiple sources, competition is deemed inadequate (2 CFR 200.320(c)).The Organization incurred expenditures of approximately $620,000 for the renovation of a community center using federal funds under the SLFRF program. The Organization received two bids for the renovation project. However, full documentation of the process was not maintained. Cause: The Organization did not establish or follow sufficient internal controls to ensure compliance with federal procurement requirements, including maintaining the required documentation for procurement activities. Possible effect: The lack of procurement documentation creates a significant risk that noncompliant practices occurred, such as non-competitive procurement or payments exceeding fair market value.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Program Name: Formula Grants for Rural Areas and Tribal Transit Program Assistance Listing Number: 20.509 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: 2024; FAIN not available. Pass-Through Agency: State of Vermont Agency of Transportation Pass-Through Number(s): EA#COVIDFTA-934 EA#FT202201-704 EA#FT24FLEX-454 EA#CRRSAA22-934 EA#FT23FLEX-064 EA#FT24FLEX-554 EA#FT201806-454 EA#FT23FLEX-454 EA#FT24FLEX-854 EA#FT201806-554 EA#FT23FLEX-554 EA#FT24FLEX-954 EA#FT201806-954 EA#FT23FLEX-954 EA#FT24FORM-454 EA#FT201903-704 EA#FT23FORM-064 EA#FT24FORM-924 EA#FT202104-704 EA#FT23FORM-934 EA#FT24FORM-934 EA#FT202104-954 EA#FT24FLEX-064 Award Period: July 1, 2023 through June 30, 2024 Compliance Requirement: Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Type of Finding: Material weakness in internal control over compliance and material noncompliance (modified opinion) Criteria or specific requirement: The United States Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Title 2, Part 200.319 indicates procurement transactions under the Federal award must be conducted in a manner that provides full and open competition. Additionally, 2 CFR Part 200.320 indicates that for any allowable method chosen, the recipient or subrecipient must maintain and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the requirements of 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart D. When a non-federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the nonfederal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR Part 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. This verification may be accomplished by (1) checking the System for Award Management (SAM) exclusions maintained by the General Services Administration (GSA), (2) collecting a certification from the entity, or (3) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that entity (2 CFR Part 180.300). 2 CFR Part 200.303 indicates that non-Federal entities receiving Federal awards must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition: For a sample of five (5) procurement transactions above the micro-purchase threshold, documentation was not maintained to support the procurement, suspension and debarment procedures performed in order to demonstrate compliance with 2 CFR Part 180 and 2 CFR Part 200. Questioned costs: Unknown. Context: Five of five transactions selected for testing in our sample. Cause: Procedures were not designed or implemented to maintain documentation to support compliance with the standards of procurement, suspension and debarment contained in 2 CFR Part 180 and 2 CFR Part 200. Effect: Compliance with the requirements of the federal award could not be demonstrated. Additionally, the lack of internal controls presents additional risk of noncompliance in circumstances where federal expenditures are made to ineligible entities. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend management enhance procedures and controls to ensure documentation is maintained to support all procurements and suspension and debarment verifications related to expenditures from federal award programs. Justification for noncompetitive procurements (i.e., sole source, public exigency, or consent of the awarding agency), should also be documented. Such documentation should be consolidated and maintained in a secure, accessible location. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding.
Information on the Federal Program U.S. Department of Education – Passed-through New Jersey Department of Education: Education Stabilization Fund (ESF): ESSER III Assistance Listing No. 84.425 3/13/2020 – 9/30/2024 ESSER III – Learning Acceleration Assistance Listing No. 84.425 3/13/2020 – 9/30/2024 ESSER III – Summer Learning and Enrichment Assistance Listing No. 84.425 3/13/2020 – 9/30/2024 ESSER III – Beyond the School Day Assistance Listing No. 84.425 3/13/2020 – 9/30/2024 ESSER III – Homeless Assistance Listing No. 84.425 3/13/2020 – 9/30/2024 Criteria or Specific Requirement Per 2 CFR § 200.320 under Part 200 of the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards dictates when the value of procurement for property or services exceed the simplified acquisition threshold or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity (State of New Jersey), formal procurement methods are required. Condition The School District did not provide evidence that it was in complete compliance with formal procurement methods. Questioned Costs Undetermined. Context Purchases made by the School District in excess of the procurement threshold established by a non-Federal entity (State of New Jersey) did not have supporting documentation available to verify complete compliance with formal procurement methods. Effect or Potential Effect The School District was not in compliance with 2 CFR § 200.320 under Part 200 of the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards. Cause Unknown. Identification as a Repeat Finding See Finding 2023-004. Recommendation That the School District retain evidence that it complied with formal procurement methods as noted in 2 CFR § 200.320 under Part 200 of the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards. View of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action The responsible officials agree with the finding and will address the matter as part of their corrective action plan.
Information on the Federal Program U.S. Department of Education – Passed-through New Jersey Department of Education: Education Stabilization Fund (ESF): ESSER III Assistance Listing No. 84.425 3/13/2020 – 9/30/2024 ESSER III – Learning Acceleration Assistance Listing No. 84.425 3/13/2020 – 9/30/2024 ESSER III – Summer Learning and Enrichment Assistance Listing No. 84.425 3/13/2020 – 9/30/2024 ESSER III – Beyond the School Day Assistance Listing No. 84.425 3/13/2020 – 9/30/2024 ESSER III – Homeless Assistance Listing No. 84.425 3/13/2020 – 9/30/2024 Criteria or Specific Requirement Per 2 CFR § 200.320 under Part 200 of the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards dictates when the value of procurement for property or services exceed the simplified acquisition threshold or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity (State of New Jersey), formal procurement methods are required. Condition The School District did not provide evidence that it was in complete compliance with formal procurement methods. Questioned Costs Undetermined. Context Purchases made by the School District in excess of the procurement threshold established by a non-Federal entity (State of New Jersey) did not have supporting documentation available to verify complete compliance with formal procurement methods. Effect or Potential Effect The School District was not in compliance with 2 CFR § 200.320 under Part 200 of the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards. Cause Unknown. Identification as a Repeat Finding See Finding 2023-004. Recommendation That the School District retain evidence that it complied with formal procurement methods as noted in 2 CFR § 200.320 under Part 200 of the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards. View of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action The responsible officials agree with the finding and will address the matter as part of their corrective action plan.
Information on the Federal Program U.S. Department of Education – Passed-through New Jersey Department of Education: Education Stabilization Fund (ESF): ESSER III Assistance Listing No. 84.425 3/13/2020 – 9/30/2024 ESSER III – Learning Acceleration Assistance Listing No. 84.425 3/13/2020 – 9/30/2024 ESSER III – Summer Learning and Enrichment Assistance Listing No. 84.425 3/13/2020 – 9/30/2024 ESSER III – Beyond the School Day Assistance Listing No. 84.425 3/13/2020 – 9/30/2024 ESSER III – Homeless Assistance Listing No. 84.425 3/13/2020 – 9/30/2024 Criteria or Specific Requirement Per 2 CFR § 200.320 under Part 200 of the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards dictates when the value of procurement for property or services exceed the simplified acquisition threshold or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity (State of New Jersey), formal procurement methods are required. Condition The School District did not provide evidence that it was in complete compliance with formal procurement methods. Questioned Costs Undetermined. Context Purchases made by the School District in excess of the procurement threshold established by a non-Federal entity (State of New Jersey) did not have supporting documentation available to verify complete compliance with formal procurement methods. Effect or Potential Effect The School District was not in compliance with 2 CFR § 200.320 under Part 200 of the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards. Cause Unknown. Identification as a Repeat Finding See Finding 2023-004. Recommendation That the School District retain evidence that it complied with formal procurement methods as noted in 2 CFR § 200.320 under Part 200 of the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards. View of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action The responsible officials agree with the finding and will address the matter as part of their corrective action plan.
Information on the Federal Program U.S. Department of Education – Passed-through New Jersey Department of Education: Education Stabilization Fund (ESF): ESSER III Assistance Listing No. 84.425 3/13/2020 – 9/30/2024 ESSER III – Learning Acceleration Assistance Listing No. 84.425 3/13/2020 – 9/30/2024 ESSER III – Summer Learning and Enrichment Assistance Listing No. 84.425 3/13/2020 – 9/30/2024 ESSER III – Beyond the School Day Assistance Listing No. 84.425 3/13/2020 – 9/30/2024 ESSER III – Homeless Assistance Listing No. 84.425 3/13/2020 – 9/30/2024 Criteria or Specific Requirement Per 2 CFR § 200.320 under Part 200 of the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards dictates when the value of procurement for property or services exceed the simplified acquisition threshold or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity (State of New Jersey), formal procurement methods are required. Condition The School District did not provide evidence that it was in complete compliance with formal procurement methods. Questioned Costs Undetermined. Context Purchases made by the School District in excess of the procurement threshold established by a non-Federal entity (State of New Jersey) did not have supporting documentation available to verify complete compliance with formal procurement methods. Effect or Potential Effect The School District was not in compliance with 2 CFR § 200.320 under Part 200 of the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards. Cause Unknown. Identification as a Repeat Finding See Finding 2023-004. Recommendation That the School District retain evidence that it complied with formal procurement methods as noted in 2 CFR § 200.320 under Part 200 of the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards. View of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action The responsible officials agree with the finding and will address the matter as part of their corrective action plan.
Information on the Federal Program U.S. Department of Education – Passed-through New Jersey Department of Education: Education Stabilization Fund (ESF): ESSER III Assistance Listing No. 84.425 3/13/2020 – 9/30/2024 ESSER III – Learning Acceleration Assistance Listing No. 84.425 3/13/2020 – 9/30/2024 ESSER III – Summer Learning and Enrichment Assistance Listing No. 84.425 3/13/2020 – 9/30/2024 ESSER III – Beyond the School Day Assistance Listing No. 84.425 3/13/2020 – 9/30/2024 ESSER III – Homeless Assistance Listing No. 84.425 3/13/2020 – 9/30/2024 Criteria or Specific Requirement Per 2 CFR § 200.320 under Part 200 of the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards dictates when the value of procurement for property or services exceed the simplified acquisition threshold or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity (State of New Jersey), formal procurement methods are required. Condition The School District did not provide evidence that it was in complete compliance with formal procurement methods. Questioned Costs Undetermined. Context Purchases made by the School District in excess of the procurement threshold established by a non-Federal entity (State of New Jersey) did not have supporting documentation available to verify complete compliance with formal procurement methods. Effect or Potential Effect The School District was not in compliance with 2 CFR § 200.320 under Part 200 of the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards. Cause Unknown. Identification as a Repeat Finding See Finding 2023-004. Recommendation That the School District retain evidence that it complied with formal procurement methods as noted in 2 CFR § 200.320 under Part 200 of the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards. View of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action The responsible officials agree with the finding and will address the matter as part of their corrective action plan.
2 CFR § 3474.1 provides the Department of Education (DOE) adopts the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Guidance in 2 CFR part 200. Thus, this section gives regulatory effect to the OMB guidance and supplements the guidance as needed for the DOE, except as otherwise noted in that section. 2 CFR § 200.320(b) states in part that when the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal financial assistance award exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require following documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a non-competitive procurement can be used in accordance with § 200.319 or paragraph (c) of this section. 2 CFR § 200.318(e) states to foster greater economy and efficiency, and in accordance with efforts to promote cost-effective use of shared services across the Federal Government, the non-Federal entity is encouraged to enter into state and local intergovernmental agreements or inter-entity agreements where appropriate for procurement or use of common or shared goods and services. Competition requirements will be met with documented procurement actions using strategic sourcing, shared services, and other similar procurement arrangements. 2 CFR §200.320(2)(a) states for small purchases the acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. Ohio Rev. Code § 167.081, states that a regional council may enter into a unit price contract for materials, labor, services, overhead, profit, and associated expenses for the repair, enlargement, improvement, or demolition of a building or structure if the contract is awarded pursuant to a competitive bidding procedure of a county, municipal corporation, or township or a special district, school district, or other political subdivision that is a council member. A political subdivision that is a member of a regional council may participate in a contract entered into under Ohio Rev. Code § 167.081. Purchases under a contract entered into under Ohio Rev. Code § 167.081 are exempt from any competitive selection or bidding requirements otherwise required by law. Furthermore, the District’s Procurement – Federal Grants/Funds Policy (#6325) details the District’s procedures for procurement with federal funds. Specifically, Maintenance of Procurement Records: The District shall maintain records sufficient to detail the history of all procurements. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price (including a cost or price analysis). The District participated in The Ohio Purchasing Council’s unit price contract with Prodigy Building Solutions, LLC., for the School District's roofing, HVAC, and Lighting project, pursuant to Ohio Rev. Code § 167.081. The School District utilized ESSER grant funds for parts of these projects. The School District did not maintain documentation that Ohio Purchasing Council followed competitive bidding procedures of a council member pursuant to O.R.C. 167.081 when awarding the unit price contract to Prodigy Building Solutions respectively, failing to meet the documentation requirements of 2 CFR § 200.320(b) and 2 CFR § 200.318(e) noted above. Failure to comply with the applicable Uniform Guidance Requirements and the Ohio Revised Code could result in misuse of public funds, potential questioned costs, and/or potential loss of grant funding. The District should review its policy, Uniform Guidance requirements, and the Ohio Revised Code before entering into any contracts that require competitive bidding. In addition, the District should fully implement its procurement policy.
2 CFR § 3474.1 provides the Department of Education (DOE) adopts the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Guidance in 2 CFR part 200. Thus, this section gives regulatory effect to the OMB guidance and supplements the guidance as needed for the DOE, except as otherwise noted in that section. 2 CFR § 200.320(b) states in part that when the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal financial assistance award exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require following documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a non-competitive procurement can be used in accordance with § 200.319 or paragraph (c) of this section. 2 CFR § 200.318(e) states to foster greater economy and efficiency, and in accordance with efforts to promote cost-effective use of shared services across the Federal Government, the non-Federal entity is encouraged to enter into state and local intergovernmental agreements or inter-entity agreements where appropriate for procurement or use of common or shared goods and services. Competition requirements will be met with documented procurement actions using strategic sourcing, shared services, and other similar procurement arrangements. 2 CFR §200.320(2)(a) states for small purchases the acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. Ohio Rev. Code § 167.081, states that a regional council may enter into a unit price contract for materials, labor, services, overhead, profit, and associated expenses for the repair, enlargement, improvement, or demolition of a building or structure if the contract is awarded pursuant to a competitive bidding procedure of a county, municipal corporation, or township or a special district, school district, or other political subdivision that is a council member. A political subdivision that is a member of a regional council may participate in a contract entered into under Ohio Rev. Code § 167.081. Purchases under a contract entered into under Ohio Rev. Code § 167.081 are exempt from any competitive selection or bidding requirements otherwise required by law. Furthermore, the District’s Procurement – Federal Grants/Funds Policy (#6325) details the District’s procedures for procurement with federal funds. Specifically, Maintenance of Procurement Records: The District shall maintain records sufficient to detail the history of all procurements. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price (including a cost or price analysis). The District participated in The Ohio Purchasing Council’s unit price contract with Prodigy Building Solutions, LLC., for the School District's roofing, HVAC, and Lighting project, pursuant to Ohio Rev. Code § 167.081. The School District utilized ESSER grant funds for parts of these projects. The School District did not maintain documentation that Ohio Purchasing Council followed competitive bidding procedures of a council member pursuant to O.R.C. 167.081 when awarding the unit price contract to Prodigy Building Solutions respectively, failing to meet the documentation requirements of 2 CFR § 200.320(b) and 2 CFR § 200.318(e) noted above. Failure to comply with the applicable Uniform Guidance Requirements and the Ohio Revised Code could result in misuse of public funds, potential questioned costs, and/or potential loss of grant funding. The District should review its policy, Uniform Guidance requirements, and the Ohio Revised Code before entering into any contracts that require competitive bidding. In addition, the District should fully implement its procurement policy.
2 CFR § 3474.1 provides the Department of Education (DOE) adopts the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Guidance in 2 CFR part 200. Thus, this section gives regulatory effect to the OMB guidance and supplements the guidance as needed for the DOE, except as otherwise noted in that section. 2 CFR § 200.320(b) states in part that when the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal financial assistance award exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require following documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a non-competitive procurement can be used in accordance with § 200.319 or paragraph (c) of this section. 2 CFR § 200.318(e) states to foster greater economy and efficiency, and in accordance with efforts to promote cost-effective use of shared services across the Federal Government, the non-Federal entity is encouraged to enter into state and local intergovernmental agreements or inter-entity agreements where appropriate for procurement or use of common or shared goods and services. Competition requirements will be met with documented procurement actions using strategic sourcing, shared services, and other similar procurement arrangements. 2 CFR §200.320(2)(a) states for small purchases the acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. Ohio Rev. Code § 167.081, states that a regional council may enter into a unit price contract for materials, labor, services, overhead, profit, and associated expenses for the repair, enlargement, improvement, or demolition of a building or structure if the contract is awarded pursuant to a competitive bidding procedure of a county, municipal corporation, or township or a special district, school district, or other political subdivision that is a council member. A political subdivision that is a member of a regional council may participate in a contract entered into under Ohio Rev. Code § 167.081. Purchases under a contract entered into under Ohio Rev. Code § 167.081 are exempt from any competitive selection or bidding requirements otherwise required by law. Furthermore, the District’s Procurement – Federal Grants/Funds Policy (#6325) details the District’s procedures for procurement with federal funds. Specifically, Maintenance of Procurement Records: The District shall maintain records sufficient to detail the history of all procurements. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price (including a cost or price analysis). The District participated in The Ohio Purchasing Council’s unit price contract with Prodigy Building Solutions, LLC., for the School District's roofing, HVAC, and Lighting project, pursuant to Ohio Rev. Code § 167.081. The School District utilized ESSER grant funds for parts of these projects. The School District did not maintain documentation that Ohio Purchasing Council followed competitive bidding procedures of a council member pursuant to O.R.C. 167.081 when awarding the unit price contract to Prodigy Building Solutions respectively, failing to meet the documentation requirements of 2 CFR § 200.320(b) and 2 CFR § 200.318(e) noted above. Failure to comply with the applicable Uniform Guidance Requirements and the Ohio Revised Code could result in misuse of public funds, potential questioned costs, and/or potential loss of grant funding. The District should review its policy, Uniform Guidance requirements, and the Ohio Revised Code before entering into any contracts that require competitive bidding. In addition, the District should fully implement its procurement policy.
2 CFR § 3474.1 provides the Department of Education (DOE) adopts the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Guidance in 2 CFR part 200. Thus, this section gives regulatory effect to the OMB guidance and supplements the guidance as needed for the DOE, except as otherwise noted in that section. 2 CFR § 200.320(b) states in part that when the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal financial assistance award exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require following documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a non-competitive procurement can be used in accordance with § 200.319 or paragraph (c) of this section. 2 CFR § 200.318(e) states to foster greater economy and efficiency, and in accordance with efforts to promote cost-effective use of shared services across the Federal Government, the non-Federal entity is encouraged to enter into state and local intergovernmental agreements or inter-entity agreements where appropriate for procurement or use of common or shared goods and services. Competition requirements will be met with documented procurement actions using strategic sourcing, shared services, and other similar procurement arrangements. 2 CFR §200.320(2)(a) states for small purchases the acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. Ohio Rev. Code § 167.081, states that a regional council may enter into a unit price contract for materials, labor, services, overhead, profit, and associated expenses for the repair, enlargement, improvement, or demolition of a building or structure if the contract is awarded pursuant to a competitive bidding procedure of a county, municipal corporation, or township or a special district, school district, or other political subdivision that is a council member. A political subdivision that is a member of a regional council may participate in a contract entered into under Ohio Rev. Code § 167.081. Purchases under a contract entered into under Ohio Rev. Code § 167.081 are exempt from any competitive selection or bidding requirements otherwise required by law. Furthermore, the District’s Procurement – Federal Grants/Funds Policy (#6325) details the District’s procedures for procurement with federal funds. Specifically, Maintenance of Procurement Records: The District shall maintain records sufficient to detail the history of all procurements. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price (including a cost or price analysis). The District participated in The Ohio Purchasing Council’s unit price contract with Prodigy Building Solutions, LLC., for the School District's roofing, HVAC, and Lighting project, pursuant to Ohio Rev. Code § 167.081. The School District utilized ESSER grant funds for parts of these projects. The School District did not maintain documentation that Ohio Purchasing Council followed competitive bidding procedures of a council member pursuant to O.R.C. 167.081 when awarding the unit price contract to Prodigy Building Solutions respectively, failing to meet the documentation requirements of 2 CFR § 200.320(b) and 2 CFR § 200.318(e) noted above. Failure to comply with the applicable Uniform Guidance Requirements and the Ohio Revised Code could result in misuse of public funds, potential questioned costs, and/or potential loss of grant funding. The District should review its policy, Uniform Guidance requirements, and the Ohio Revised Code before entering into any contracts that require competitive bidding. In addition, the District should fully implement its procurement policy.
2 CFR 1000.10 gives regulatory effect to the U.S. Department of Treasury for 2 CFR § 200.318 through 200.327 which describe specific procedures non-Federal entities must follow when entering into procurement transactions using Federal funds. 2 CFR § 200.320(a)(2) indicates, in part, when the aggregate dollar amount of the procurement transaction is higher than the micro-purchase threshold, but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, simplified acquisition procedures can be used. If simplified acquisition procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined by the recipient or subrecipient. 2 CFR § 200.318(i) indicates the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement transaction. These records must include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Due to a lack of controls over the procurement process, for one out of two vendors examined during testing of the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds grant, the District did not obtain quotes from other vendors. The procurement was below the simplified acquisition threshold and above the micro-purchase threshold; therefore, small purchase procedures require the District to obtain “price or rate quotations from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by” the District. The District’s procurement policy does not specify the number and form of quotations required under small purchasing procedures. Failure to obtain quotations from a variety of vendors may result in the District not utilizing the most cost effective vendor as well as further noncompliance with Federal requirements. The District should adopt procedures to help ensure records are maintained to document the history of the procurement, including the rationale for the purchase method, selection of vendors, cost/price analysis (if applicable) and the reason for limiting competition (if applicable). The District should also amend its procurement policy to indicate the number and form of quotations required when using small purchase procedures.
ESC – Federal Procurement Finding Number: 2024-001 Assistance Listing Number and Title: AL # 84.027 / 84.173 Federal Award Identification Number / Year: 2024 Federal Agency: United States Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement Pass-Through Entity: Ohio Department of Education and Workforce Repeat Finding from Prior Audit? No NONCOMPLIANCE AND MATERIAL WEAKNESS Ohio Rev. Code §§ 3313.843 and 3313.845 allow traditional schools to contract with Educational Service Centers (ESCs) to provide services as outlined in the agreement between the two parties. Ohio Rev. Code §3313.843(C) requires these agreements to be filed with the Ohio Department of Education and Workforce by the first day of July of the school year for which the agreement is in effect. Effective on December 26, 2014, 2 CFR § 200.320 outlined the methods of procurement to be followed by state subrecipient non-Federal entities when expending certain types of Federal funds, including those received through Grant Agreements. However, 2 CFR § 200.110(a), created a “grace period” for compliance with 2 CFR §200.320, by permitting non-Federal entities to comply with previously issued Office of Management and Budget procurement guidance for all fiscal years beginning prior to December 26, 2017. In January 2020, the Ohio Department of Education and Workforce (DEW) published a form that allows schools to request DEW authorize a noncompetitive proposal for their ESC Services. This form is available on DEW’s website. During the fiscal year, the School District contracted with Trumbull County Educational Service Center (ESC) to provide purchased services. These services included expenditures of $55,860, which were paid for out of the Special Education Cluster Grants and subject to the Federal procurement laws. The School District did not complete the form that allows schools to request DEW authorize a noncompetitive proposal for their ESC Services that is available on the DEW website. Under 2 CFR §200.320 the School District should have competitively bid the services needed or obtained price quotes from qualified sources as further defined in the School District’s procurement policy. The School District should develop a control(s) and/or procedure(s) to verify that established procurement procedures are followed when entering into contracts using Federal monies. The DEW form that allows schools to request DEW authorize a noncompetitive proposal for their ESC Services should be utilized for any ESC contract in the future. Failure to follow proper procurement procedures could result in contracts awarded to entities which do not meet all the needs of the School District or have a cost significantly higher than their competitors, as well as a loss in future federal funding and possible questioned costs in future audits. Official’s Response: See Corrective Action Plan.
ESC – Federal Procurement Finding Number: 2024-001 Assistance Listing Number and Title: AL # 84.027 / 84.173 Federal Award Identification Number / Year: 2024 Federal Agency: United States Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement Pass-Through Entity: Ohio Department of Education and Workforce Repeat Finding from Prior Audit? No NONCOMPLIANCE AND MATERIAL WEAKNESS Ohio Rev. Code §§ 3313.843 and 3313.845 allow traditional schools to contract with Educational Service Centers (ESCs) to provide services as outlined in the agreement between the two parties. Ohio Rev. Code §3313.843(C) requires these agreements to be filed with the Ohio Department of Education and Workforce by the first day of July of the school year for which the agreement is in effect. Effective on December 26, 2014, 2 CFR § 200.320 outlined the methods of procurement to be followed by state subrecipient non-Federal entities when expending certain types of Federal funds, including those received through Grant Agreements. However, 2 CFR § 200.110(a), created a “grace period” for compliance with 2 CFR §200.320, by permitting non-Federal entities to comply with previously issued Office of Management and Budget procurement guidance for all fiscal years beginning prior to December 26, 2017. In January 2020, the Ohio Department of Education and Workforce (DEW) published a form that allows schools to request DEW authorize a noncompetitive proposal for their ESC Services. This form is available on DEW’s website. During the fiscal year, the School District contracted with Trumbull County Educational Service Center (ESC) to provide purchased services. These services included expenditures of $55,860, which were paid for out of the Special Education Cluster Grants and subject to the Federal procurement laws. The School District did not complete the form that allows schools to request DEW authorize a noncompetitive proposal for their ESC Services that is available on the DEW website. Under 2 CFR §200.320 the School District should have competitively bid the services needed or obtained price quotes from qualified sources as further defined in the School District’s procurement policy. The School District should develop a control(s) and/or procedure(s) to verify that established procurement procedures are followed when entering into contracts using Federal monies. The DEW form that allows schools to request DEW authorize a noncompetitive proposal for their ESC Services should be utilized for any ESC contract in the future. Failure to follow proper procurement procedures could result in contracts awarded to entities which do not meet all the needs of the School District or have a cost significantly higher than their competitors, as well as a loss in future federal funding and possible questioned costs in future audits. Official’s Response: See Corrective Action Plan.
ESC – Federal Procurement Finding Number: 2024-001 Assistance Listing Number and Title: AL # 84.027 / 84.173 Federal Award Identification Number / Year: 2024 Federal Agency: United States Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement Pass-Through Entity: Ohio Department of Education and Workforce Repeat Finding from Prior Audit? No NONCOMPLIANCE AND MATERIAL WEAKNESS Ohio Rev. Code §§ 3313.843 and 3313.845 allow traditional schools to contract with Educational Service Centers (ESCs) to provide services as outlined in the agreement between the two parties. Ohio Rev. Code §3313.843(C) requires these agreements to be filed with the Ohio Department of Education and Workforce by the first day of July of the school year for which the agreement is in effect. Effective on December 26, 2014, 2 CFR § 200.320 outlined the methods of procurement to be followed by state subrecipient non-Federal entities when expending certain types of Federal funds, including those received through Grant Agreements. However, 2 CFR § 200.110(a), created a “grace period” for compliance with 2 CFR §200.320, by permitting non-Federal entities to comply with previously issued Office of Management and Budget procurement guidance for all fiscal years beginning prior to December 26, 2017. In January 2020, the Ohio Department of Education and Workforce (DEW) published a form that allows schools to request DEW authorize a noncompetitive proposal for their ESC Services. This form is available on DEW’s website. During the fiscal year, the School District contracted with Trumbull County Educational Service Center (ESC) to provide purchased services. These services included expenditures of $55,860, which were paid for out of the Special Education Cluster Grants and subject to the Federal procurement laws. The School District did not complete the form that allows schools to request DEW authorize a noncompetitive proposal for their ESC Services that is available on the DEW website. Under 2 CFR §200.320 the School District should have competitively bid the services needed or obtained price quotes from qualified sources as further defined in the School District’s procurement policy. The School District should develop a control(s) and/or procedure(s) to verify that established procurement procedures are followed when entering into contracts using Federal monies. The DEW form that allows schools to request DEW authorize a noncompetitive proposal for their ESC Services should be utilized for any ESC contract in the future. Failure to follow proper procurement procedures could result in contracts awarded to entities which do not meet all the needs of the School District or have a cost significantly higher than their competitors, as well as a loss in future federal funding and possible questioned costs in future audits. Official’s Response: See Corrective Action Plan.
CONDITION: During my review of Aliquippa School District’s compliance with the requirements of the Public School Code and the Uniform Guidance for procurement of goods and services, the District was unable to provide documentation or other evidence that either 1) three price or rate quotations for the purchase of goods between $10,000 and $22,500, and services between $10,000 and $250,000 were obtained, 2) competitive bidding was performed for the purchases of goods over $22,500 or 3) the vendor met the requirements of a ‘sole source provider’ with documentation to support such designation, for the following vendors: Voyager Sopris Learning ($49,117) and Questeq ($70,549). This is a repeat procurement finding from (2023-004) from the previous fiscal year. CRITERIA: As specified in 2 CFR 200 318(i) of the Uniform Guidance, the District must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. In addition, small purchase procedures per 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2)(i) for acquisitions between the micro-purchase threshold (currently $10,000) and the simplified acquisition threshold (current $250,000), price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate. Per 24 PA Statue 8.807.1, there should be three quotes that are either written or well documented and over $22,500 formal bidding procedures must be utilized. Furthermore, Section 2 CFR 200.320(c’) of the Uniform Guidance details five (5) circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. CAUSE: District officials responsible for federal procurement did not adhere to District, state and federal policies and regulations regarding the expenditure of federal funds. EFFECT: The District did not comply with 1) the District’s Procurement Policy for Federal Programs, 2) the 24 PA Statute 8.807.1, 3) Section 2 CFR 200.300(a)(2)(i) of the Uniform Guidance regarding obtaining three price or rate quotations for the purchase of goods between $10,000 and $22,500, and services between $10,000 and $250,000, or 4) Section 2 CFR 200.318(i) and Section 2CFR 200.320(c’) of the Uniform Guidance regarding the proper documentation required for noncompetitive procurement using federal funding. QUESTIONED COST: $119,666 RECOMMENDATION: I recommend that for all future purchases of goods and/or services utilizing federal funds, that the District adhere to the requirements of 1) the District’s Procurement Policy for Federal Programs, 2) the 24 PA Statute 8.807.1, 3) Section 2 CFR 200.318(i) of the Uniform Guidance regarding maintaining records sufficient to detail the history of procurement which includes rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price, 4) Section 2 CFR 200.300(a)(2)(i) of the Uniform Guidance regarding obtaining three price or rate quotations for the purchase of goods between $10,000 and $22,500, and services between $10,000 and $250,000, and as applicable, and 5) Section 2 CFR 200.318(i) and Section 2CFR 200.320(c’) of the Uniform Guidance regarding the proper documentation required for noncompetitive procurement using federal funding. VIEW OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS: See Correction Action Plan
CONDITION: During my review of Aliquippa School District’s compliance with the requirements of the Public School Code and the Uniform Guidance for procurement of goods and services, the District was unable to provide documentation or other evidence that 1) competitive bidding was performed for the purchases of goods or services over $22,500 and 2) a cost or price analysis for purchases in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold ($250,000), or 3) the vendor met the requirements of a ‘sole source provider’ with documentation to support such designation, for the following vendor –– Beaver Valley Intermediate Unit ($332,200). This is a repeat procurement finding from (2023-005) from the previous fiscal year.CRITERIA: As specified in 2 CFR 200. 318(i) of the Uniform Guidance, the District must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. In addition, small purchase procedures per 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2)(i) for acquisitions between the micro-purchase threshold (currently $10,000) and the simplified acquisition threshold (current $250,000), price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate. Per 24 PA Statue 8.807.1, there should be three quotes that are either written or well documented. Furthermore, Section 2 CFR 200.320(c’) of the Uniform Guidance details five (5) circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. CAUSE: District officials responsible for federal procurement did not adhere to District, state and federal policies and regulations regarding the expenditure of federal funds. EFFECT: The District did not comply with 1) the District’s Procurement Policy for Federal Programs, 2) the 24 PA Statute 8.807.1, 3) Section 2 CFR 200.318(i) and Section 2CFR 200.320(c’) of the Uniform Guidance regarding the proper documentation required for noncompetitive procurement using federal funding, or 4) Section CFR 200.324(a) of the Uniform Guidance regarding the requirement to perform a cost or price analysis for purchases in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold ($250,000). QUESTIONED COST: $332,200 RECOMMENDATION: I recommend that for all future purchases of goods and/or services utilizing federal funds, that the District adhere to the requirements of 1) the District’s Procurement Policy for Federal Programs, 2) the 24 PA Statute 8.807.1, 3) Section 2 CFR 200.318(i) of the Uniform Guidance regarding maintaining records sufficient to detail the history of procurement which includes rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price, 4) Section 2 CFR 200.300(a)(2)(i) of the Uniform Guidance regarding obtaining three price or rate quotations for the purchase of goods between $10,000 and $22,500, and services between $10,000 and $250,000, and as applicable, 5) Section 2 CFR 200.318(i) and Section 2CFR 200.320(c’) of the Uniform Guidance regarding the proper documentation required for noncompetitive procurement using federal funding, and 5) Section CFR 200.324(a) of the Uniform Guidance regarding the requirement to perform a cost or price analysis for purchases in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold ($250,000). VIEW OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS: See Correction Action Plan
CONDITION: During my review of Aliquippa School District’s compliance with the requirements of the Public School Code and the Uniform Guidance for procurement of goods and services, the District was unable to provide documentation or other evidence that either 1) three price or rate quotations for the purchase of goods between $10,000 and $22,500, and services between $10,000 and $250,000 were obtained, 2) competitive bidding was performed for the purchases of goods over $22,500 or 3) the vendor met the requirements of a ‘sole source provider’ with documentation to support such designation, for the following vendors: Voyager Sopris Learning ($49,117) and Questeq ($70,549). This is a repeat procurement finding from (2023-004) from the previous fiscal year. CRITERIA: As specified in 2 CFR 200 318(i) of the Uniform Guidance, the District must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. In addition, small purchase procedures per 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2)(i) for acquisitions between the micro-purchase threshold (currently $10,000) and the simplified acquisition threshold (current $250,000), price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate. Per 24 PA Statue 8.807.1, there should be three quotes that are either written or well documented and over $22,500 formal bidding procedures must be utilized. Furthermore, Section 2 CFR 200.320(c’) of the Uniform Guidance details five (5) circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. CAUSE: District officials responsible for federal procurement did not adhere to District, state and federal policies and regulations regarding the expenditure of federal funds. EFFECT: The District did not comply with 1) the District’s Procurement Policy for Federal Programs, 2) the 24 PA Statute 8.807.1, 3) Section 2 CFR 200.300(a)(2)(i) of the Uniform Guidance regarding obtaining three price or rate quotations for the purchase of goods between $10,000 and $22,500, and services between $10,000 and $250,000, or 4) Section 2 CFR 200.318(i) and Section 2CFR 200.320(c’) of the Uniform Guidance regarding the proper documentation required for noncompetitive procurement using federal funding. QUESTIONED COST: $119,666 RECOMMENDATION: I recommend that for all future purchases of goods and/or services utilizing federal funds, that the District adhere to the requirements of 1) the District’s Procurement Policy for Federal Programs, 2) the 24 PA Statute 8.807.1, 3) Section 2 CFR 200.318(i) of the Uniform Guidance regarding maintaining records sufficient to detail the history of procurement which includes rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price, 4) Section 2 CFR 200.300(a)(2)(i) of the Uniform Guidance regarding obtaining three price or rate quotations for the purchase of goods between $10,000 and $22,500, and services between $10,000 and $250,000, and as applicable, and 5) Section 2 CFR 200.318(i) and Section 2CFR 200.320(c’) of the Uniform Guidance regarding the proper documentation required for noncompetitive procurement using federal funding. VIEW OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS: See Correction Action Plan
CONDITION: During my review of Aliquippa School District’s compliance with the requirements of the Public School Code and the Uniform Guidance for procurement of goods and services, the District was unable to provide documentation or other evidence that 1) competitive bidding was performed for the purchases of goods or services over $22,500 and 2) a cost or price analysis for purchases in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold ($250,000), or 3) the vendor met the requirements of a ‘sole source provider’ with documentation to support such designation, for the following vendor –– Beaver Valley Intermediate Unit ($332,200). This is a repeat procurement finding from (2023-005) from the previous fiscal year.CRITERIA: As specified in 2 CFR 200. 318(i) of the Uniform Guidance, the District must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. In addition, small purchase procedures per 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2)(i) for acquisitions between the micro-purchase threshold (currently $10,000) and the simplified acquisition threshold (current $250,000), price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate. Per 24 PA Statue 8.807.1, there should be three quotes that are either written or well documented. Furthermore, Section 2 CFR 200.320(c’) of the Uniform Guidance details five (5) circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. CAUSE: District officials responsible for federal procurement did not adhere to District, state and federal policies and regulations regarding the expenditure of federal funds. EFFECT: The District did not comply with 1) the District’s Procurement Policy for Federal Programs, 2) the 24 PA Statute 8.807.1, 3) Section 2 CFR 200.318(i) and Section 2CFR 200.320(c’) of the Uniform Guidance regarding the proper documentation required for noncompetitive procurement using federal funding, or 4) Section CFR 200.324(a) of the Uniform Guidance regarding the requirement to perform a cost or price analysis for purchases in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold ($250,000). QUESTIONED COST: $332,200 RECOMMENDATION: I recommend that for all future purchases of goods and/or services utilizing federal funds, that the District adhere to the requirements of 1) the District’s Procurement Policy for Federal Programs, 2) the 24 PA Statute 8.807.1, 3) Section 2 CFR 200.318(i) of the Uniform Guidance regarding maintaining records sufficient to detail the history of procurement which includes rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price, 4) Section 2 CFR 200.300(a)(2)(i) of the Uniform Guidance regarding obtaining three price or rate quotations for the purchase of goods between $10,000 and $22,500, and services between $10,000 and $250,000, and as applicable, 5) Section 2 CFR 200.318(i) and Section 2CFR 200.320(c’) of the Uniform Guidance regarding the proper documentation required for noncompetitive procurement using federal funding, and 5) Section CFR 200.324(a) of the Uniform Guidance regarding the requirement to perform a cost or price analysis for purchases in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold ($250,000). VIEW OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS: See Correction Action Plan
CONDITION: During my review of Aliquippa School District’s compliance with the requirements of the Public School Code and the Uniform Guidance for procurement of goods and services, the District was unable to provide documentation or other evidence that either 1) three price or rate quotations for the purchase of goods between $10,000 and $22,500, and services between $10,000 and $250,000 were obtained, 2) competitive bidding was performed for the purchases of goods over $22,500 or 3) the vendor met the requirements of a ‘sole source provider’ with documentation to support such designation, for the following vendors: Voyager Sopris Learning ($49,117) and Questeq ($70,549). This is a repeat procurement finding from (2023-004) from the previous fiscal year. CRITERIA: As specified in 2 CFR 200 318(i) of the Uniform Guidance, the District must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. In addition, small purchase procedures per 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2)(i) for acquisitions between the micro-purchase threshold (currently $10,000) and the simplified acquisition threshold (current $250,000), price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate. Per 24 PA Statue 8.807.1, there should be three quotes that are either written or well documented and over $22,500 formal bidding procedures must be utilized. Furthermore, Section 2 CFR 200.320(c’) of the Uniform Guidance details five (5) circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. CAUSE: District officials responsible for federal procurement did not adhere to District, state and federal policies and regulations regarding the expenditure of federal funds. EFFECT: The District did not comply with 1) the District’s Procurement Policy for Federal Programs, 2) the 24 PA Statute 8.807.1, 3) Section 2 CFR 200.300(a)(2)(i) of the Uniform Guidance regarding obtaining three price or rate quotations for the purchase of goods between $10,000 and $22,500, and services between $10,000 and $250,000, or 4) Section 2 CFR 200.318(i) and Section 2CFR 200.320(c’) of the Uniform Guidance regarding the proper documentation required for noncompetitive procurement using federal funding. QUESTIONED COST: $119,666 RECOMMENDATION: I recommend that for all future purchases of goods and/or services utilizing federal funds, that the District adhere to the requirements of 1) the District’s Procurement Policy for Federal Programs, 2) the 24 PA Statute 8.807.1, 3) Section 2 CFR 200.318(i) of the Uniform Guidance regarding maintaining records sufficient to detail the history of procurement which includes rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price, 4) Section 2 CFR 200.300(a)(2)(i) of the Uniform Guidance regarding obtaining three price or rate quotations for the purchase of goods between $10,000 and $22,500, and services between $10,000 and $250,000, and as applicable, and 5) Section 2 CFR 200.318(i) and Section 2CFR 200.320(c’) of the Uniform Guidance regarding the proper documentation required for noncompetitive procurement using federal funding. VIEW OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS: See Correction Action Plan
CONDITION: During my review of Aliquippa School District’s compliance with the requirements of the Public School Code and the Uniform Guidance for procurement of goods and services, the District was unable to provide documentation or other evidence that 1) competitive bidding was performed for the purchases of goods or services over $22,500 and 2) a cost or price analysis for purchases in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold ($250,000), or 3) the vendor met the requirements of a ‘sole source provider’ with documentation to support such designation, for the following vendor –– Beaver Valley Intermediate Unit ($332,200). This is a repeat procurement finding from (2023-005) from the previous fiscal year.CRITERIA: As specified in 2 CFR 200. 318(i) of the Uniform Guidance, the District must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. In addition, small purchase procedures per 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2)(i) for acquisitions between the micro-purchase threshold (currently $10,000) and the simplified acquisition threshold (current $250,000), price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate. Per 24 PA Statue 8.807.1, there should be three quotes that are either written or well documented. Furthermore, Section 2 CFR 200.320(c’) of the Uniform Guidance details five (5) circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. CAUSE: District officials responsible for federal procurement did not adhere to District, state and federal policies and regulations regarding the expenditure of federal funds. EFFECT: The District did not comply with 1) the District’s Procurement Policy for Federal Programs, 2) the 24 PA Statute 8.807.1, 3) Section 2 CFR 200.318(i) and Section 2CFR 200.320(c’) of the Uniform Guidance regarding the proper documentation required for noncompetitive procurement using federal funding, or 4) Section CFR 200.324(a) of the Uniform Guidance regarding the requirement to perform a cost or price analysis for purchases in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold ($250,000). QUESTIONED COST: $332,200 RECOMMENDATION: I recommend that for all future purchases of goods and/or services utilizing federal funds, that the District adhere to the requirements of 1) the District’s Procurement Policy for Federal Programs, 2) the 24 PA Statute 8.807.1, 3) Section 2 CFR 200.318(i) of the Uniform Guidance regarding maintaining records sufficient to detail the history of procurement which includes rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price, 4) Section 2 CFR 200.300(a)(2)(i) of the Uniform Guidance regarding obtaining three price or rate quotations for the purchase of goods between $10,000 and $22,500, and services between $10,000 and $250,000, and as applicable, 5) Section 2 CFR 200.318(i) and Section 2CFR 200.320(c’) of the Uniform Guidance regarding the proper documentation required for noncompetitive procurement using federal funding, and 5) Section CFR 200.324(a) of the Uniform Guidance regarding the requirement to perform a cost or price analysis for purchases in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold ($250,000). VIEW OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS: See Correction Action Plan
Criteria or Specific Requirement: There are three types of procurement methods described in 2 CFR 200.320 that the City is required to follow under the Uniform Guidance: informal procurement methods (for micro-purchases and simplified acquisitions); formal procurement methods (through sealed bids or proposals); and noncompetitive procurement methods. Condition: There are specific circumstances under the Uniform Guidance in which the City may use a noncompetitive procurement method. During our testing, we noted the City's use of the noncompetitive procurement method was inappropriate. Questioned Costs: None. Context: For one out of five samples tested, the City did not properly follow the procurement methods described in CFR 200.320. The City's municipal code allows for exceptions to the bidding requirements of the City's purchasing policy for engineering services. However, it is not one of the circumstances under the Uniform Guidance in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. Cause: The department was not aware of the Uniform Guidance procurement requirements. Effect: The City is not in compliance with the procurement requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Recommendation: We recommend the City implement controls and procedures to ensure procurements with federal funds follow the Uniform Guidance requirements. View of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name 21.027, U.S. Department of the Treasury, COVID 19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, and 93.493, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Congressional Directives Federal Award Identification Number and Year 21.027 192908 and 93.493 6 CE2CS52794 01 07 Pass through Entity 21.027 Chicago Department of Public Health; 93.493 N/A Finding Type Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding No Criteria Per 2 CFR 200.303(a), nonfederal entities must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in Standards for Internal Control Integrated Framework, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Per 2 CFR 200.318(i), the nonfederal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Per 2 CFR 200.319(a) All procurement transactions under the federal award must be conducted in a manner that provides full and open competition and is consistent with the standards of this section and § 200.320(b) covering formal procurement methods. Per 2 CFR 200.324(a), the nonfederal entity must perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), including contract modifications. The method and degree of analysis is dependent upon the facts surrounding the particular procurement situation; but, as a starting point, the nonfederal entity must make independent estimates before receiving bids or proposals. Finally, per 2 CFR 180.300, nonfederal entities must verify that outside parties are not suspended or debarred from engaging in federal activity before entering into a covered transaction. Condition Controls were not sufficient to ensure procurement activities were performed in accordance with 2 CFR 200 and management’s internal policies and procedures related to procurement, suspension, and debarment. Questioned Costs $ 237,890 If Questioned Costs are not Determinable, Description of why Known Questioned Costs Were Undetermined or Otherwise Could not be Reported N/A Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed Questioned costs represent expenditures under these contracts reported on the SEFA. Context For three contracts in excess of the Organization's formal procurement threshold ($50,000), management did not retain documentation of having obtained the required number of competitive bids or document rationale for sole procurement, did not document the history of procurement decisions, and was unable to provide evidence that contractors were checked for suspension and debarment in advance of entering into a covered transaction. Cause and Effect A lack of controls to ensure required procurement activities were performed could result in material noncompliance with federal procurement standards. Recommendation We recommend that management retain documented evidence that its policies and procedures were followed to ensure compliance with federal procurement standards. Additionally, we recommend management review its internal procurement policy regularly to ensure compliance with federal procurement standards under 2 CFR 200.317 through 200.327. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan Management agrees with the recommendation and will review the relevant guidance to ensure compliance. Careful consideration was done in selecting the vendors to look at obtaining the best cost for the value of the service as IWS was responsible for a portion of the expenses. Necessary revisions will be made to the existing procurement processes and controls in a timely manner to ensure that procurement decisions are documented, as required by 2 CFR Part 200.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name 21.027, U.S. Department of the Treasury, COVID 19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, and 93.493, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Congressional Directives Federal Award Identification Number and Year 21.027 192908 and 93.493 6 CE2CS52794 01 07 Pass through Entity 21.027 Chicago Department of Public Health; 93.493 N/A Finding Type Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding No Criteria Per 2 CFR 200.303(a), nonfederal entities must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in Standards for Internal Control Integrated Framework, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Per 2 CFR 200.318(i), the nonfederal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Per 2 CFR 200.319(a) All procurement transactions under the federal award must be conducted in a manner that provides full and open competition and is consistent with the standards of this section and § 200.320(b) covering formal procurement methods. Per 2 CFR 200.324(a), the nonfederal entity must perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), including contract modifications. The method and degree of analysis is dependent upon the facts surrounding the particular procurement situation; but, as a starting point, the nonfederal entity must make independent estimates before receiving bids or proposals. Finally, per 2 CFR 180.300, nonfederal entities must verify that outside parties are not suspended or debarred from engaging in federal activity before entering into a covered transaction. Condition Controls were not sufficient to ensure procurement activities were performed in accordance with 2 CFR 200 and management’s internal policies and procedures related to procurement, suspension, and debarment. Questioned Costs $ 237,890 If Questioned Costs are not Determinable, Description of why Known Questioned Costs Were Undetermined or Otherwise Could not be Reported N/A Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed Questioned costs represent expenditures under these contracts reported on the SEFA. Context For three contracts in excess of the Organization's formal procurement threshold ($50,000), management did not retain documentation of having obtained the required number of competitive bids or document rationale for sole procurement, did not document the history of procurement decisions, and was unable to provide evidence that contractors were checked for suspension and debarment in advance of entering into a covered transaction. Cause and Effect A lack of controls to ensure required procurement activities were performed could result in material noncompliance with federal procurement standards. Recommendation We recommend that management retain documented evidence that its policies and procedures were followed to ensure compliance with federal procurement standards. Additionally, we recommend management review its internal procurement policy regularly to ensure compliance with federal procurement standards under 2 CFR 200.317 through 200.327. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan Management agrees with the recommendation and will review the relevant guidance to ensure compliance. Careful consideration was done in selecting the vendors to look at obtaining the best cost for the value of the service as IWS was responsible for a portion of the expenses. Necessary revisions will be made to the existing procurement processes and controls in a timely manner to ensure that procurement decisions are documented, as required by 2 CFR Part 200.
Finding No. 2024-004 Procurement Federal Agency: U.S. Department of the Treasury Federal Program Name: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: SLFRFP4547 – 2021 Award Period: 3/3/21 – 12/31/24 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance, Other Matters Criteria or Specific Requirement: The Town must comply with procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.303 and 200.318 through 200.326 within Uniform Guidance. Control: Per 2 CFR section 200.303(a), a non-Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). UG §200.318 General procurement standards. (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. §200.320 states that the non-Federal entity must use one of the prescribed methods of procurement. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in §200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: (1) Micro-purchases. Procurement by micro-purchase is the acquisition of supplies or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold (See the definition of micro-purchase in §200.1). To the maximum extent practicable, the non-Federal entity should distribute micro-purchases equitably among qualified suppliers. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price or rate quotations if the non-Federal entity considers the price to be reasonable based on research, experience, purchase history or other information and documents it files accordingly. Purchase cards can be used for micropurchases if procedures are documented and approved by the non-Federal entity. (2) Small purchase. Procurement by small purchase is the acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. (b) Formal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal financial assistance award exceeds the SAT, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require following documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a noncompetitive procurement can be used in accordance with §200.319 or paragraph (c) of this section. The following formal methods of procurement are used for procurement of property or services above the simplified acquisition threshold or a value below the simplified acquisition threshold the non-Federal entity determines to be appropriate: (1) Sealed bids. Bids are publicly solicited, and a firm fixed-price contract (lump sum or unit price) is awarded to the responsible bidder whose bid, conforming with all the material terms and conditions of the invitation for bids, is the lowest in price. (2) Proposals. Either a fixed price or cost-reimbursement type contract is awarded. Proposals are generally used when conditions are not appropriate for the use of sealed bids. (c) Noncompetitive procurement. There are specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. Noncompetitive procurement can only be awarded if one or more of the allowed circumstances apply. Condition: The Town purchasing policy does not include all elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.303 and 200.318 through 200.326 noted above. Questioned Costs: None Context: Although the Town’s purchasing policies do not include all elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.303 and 200.318 through 200.326, we did not identify transactions where contracts were awarded without proper justification in 7 of 7 procurement transactions tested. Cause: Management was not aware of the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.303 and 200.318 through 200.326 within Uniform Guidance. Effect: The Town is at risk for noncompliance with Federal grants as it relates to procurement. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the Town update its procurement policies to include all elements identified in 2 CFR sections 200.303 and 200.318 through 200.326. Views of Responsible Officials: Management is working with our current auditors to update the Town’s procurement policies to be in compliance with the Uniform Guidance.
2024-009 – Material Weakness and Material Noncompliance – Procurement and Suspension and Debarment U.S. Department of Agriculture Passed through State of Connecticut Department of Education Child Nutrition Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 10.553 Program Name: School Breakfast Program Assistance Listing Number: 10.555 Program Name: National School Lunch Program Criteria: Per 2 CFR Part 200.320, “There are three types of procurement methods described in this section: informal procurement methods (for micro-purchases and simplified acquisitions); formal procurement methods (through sealed bids or proposals); and noncompetitive procurement methods. For any of these methods, the recipient or subrecipient must maintain and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319.” 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, (Uniform Guidance) requires compliance with provisions of procurement, suspension, and debarment. Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. When a non-federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the nonfederal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. Condition: The Town did not have documentation to support they complied with their purchasing policy or Uniform Guidance procurement requirements for three out of six selections. The Town did not have documentation to support it verified four vendors were not suspended or debarred for 4 out of 4 selections. Cause: Due to significant staff turnover within the Greenwich Public Schools finance function during the audit period, established controls related to procurement were not consistently applied or effectively monitored. Effect: Documentation of the requirement for procurement was not maintained. Questioned costs: $119,367 Context: See condition above. Identification as a repeat finding is applicable: N/A Recommendation: We recommend the Town develop and implement a comprehensive plan to address key personnel turnover. This plan should include clearly documented policies and procedures and appropriate cross-training to ensure continuity of operations and maintain adequate internal controls and retention of records. View of Responsible Officials: We agree with the finding. See corrective action plan.
2024-009 – Material Weakness and Material Noncompliance – Procurement and Suspension and Debarment U.S. Department of Agriculture Passed through State of Connecticut Department of Education Child Nutrition Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 10.553 Program Name: School Breakfast Program Assistance Listing Number: 10.555 Program Name: National School Lunch Program Criteria: Per 2 CFR Part 200.320, “There are three types of procurement methods described in this section: informal procurement methods (for micro-purchases and simplified acquisitions); formal procurement methods (through sealed bids or proposals); and noncompetitive procurement methods. For any of these methods, the recipient or subrecipient must maintain and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319.” 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, (Uniform Guidance) requires compliance with provisions of procurement, suspension, and debarment. Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. When a non-federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the nonfederal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. Condition: The Town did not have documentation to support they complied with their purchasing policy or Uniform Guidance procurement requirements for three out of six selections. The Town did not have documentation to support it verified four vendors were not suspended or debarred for 4 out of 4 selections. Cause: Due to significant staff turnover within the Greenwich Public Schools finance function during the audit period, established controls related to procurement were not consistently applied or effectively monitored. Effect: Documentation of the requirement for procurement was not maintained. Questioned costs: $119,367 Context: See condition above. Identification as a repeat finding is applicable: N/A Recommendation: We recommend the Town develop and implement a comprehensive plan to address key personnel turnover. This plan should include clearly documented policies and procedures and appropriate cross-training to ensure continuity of operations and maintain adequate internal controls and retention of records. View of Responsible Officials: We agree with the finding. See corrective action plan.
FA 2024-001 Strengthen Controls over Expenditures Compliance Requirements: Activities Allowed or Unallowed Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Internal Control Impact: Significant Deficiency Compliance Impact: Nonmaterial Noncompliance Federal Awarding Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Pass-Through Entity: Georgia Department of Education AL Numbers and Titles: 10.553 – School Breakfast Program 10.555 – National School Lunch Program Federal Award Numbers: 225GA324N1099 (Year: 2024), 245GA324N1199 (Year 2024) Questioned Costs: $77,285 Repeat of Prior Year Finding: FA 2023-001 Description: A review of expenditures charged to the Child Nutrition Cluster revealed that the School District’s internal control procedures were not operating appropriately to ensure that expenditures were reviewed and approved and that the School District’s procurement and suspension and debarment procedures were followed. Background Information: The Child Nutrition Cluster (CNC) is comprised of various programs that are intended to assist states in administering and overseeing food service program operators that provide healthful, nutritious meals to eligible children in public and non-profit private schools, residential child care institutions, and summer programs. This Cluster of programs also fosters healthy eating habits in children by providing fresh fruits and fresh vegetables to children attending elementary and secondary schools and encourages the domestic consumption of nutritious agricultural commodities. CNC funding was granted to the Georgia Department of Education (GaDOE) by the U.S. Department of Agriculture. GaDOE is responsible for distributing funds to local educational agencies (LEAs) and overseeing the various CNC programs. CNC funds totaling $2,251,765 were expended and reported on the Berrien County Board of Education’s Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) for fiscal year 2024. Criteria: As a recipient of federal awards, the School District is required to establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance of managing the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal awards pursuant to Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), Section 200.303 – Internal Controls. Provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.403 – Factors Affecting Allowability of Costs state that “costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles, (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items, (c) Be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the non-Federal entity… (g) Be adequately documented…” Additionally, provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.318 – General Procurement Standards state in part that “(a) the non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and… (b) non-Federal entities must maintain oversight to ensure that contractors perform in accordance with the terms, conditions, and specifications of their contracts or purchase orders.” In addition, provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.320 – Methods of Procurement to Be Followed provide guidance for procurement through small purchase procedures and state “If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources.” Condition: A sample of 60 expenditures was randomly selected for testing using a non-statistical sampling approach. These expenditures were reviewed to determine if appropriate internal controls were implemented and applicable compliance requirements were met. The following deficiencies were noted: • For three expenditures, evidence of review and approval was not reflected within the voucher package. • For seven expenditures, there was no verification of receipt of goods documented in the voucher package. Additionally, auditor reviewed 40 of these same expenditures and a sample of 20 additional expenditures, which was randomly selected for testing using a non-statistical sampling approach, to determine if procurement transactions complied with the School District’s procurement procedures and proper oversight was maintained to ensure that contractors were performing according to their contracts. The following deficiencies were noted: • Evidence of review and approval was not reflected within the voucher package for five additional expenditures. • For 19 expenditures paid to four different vendors, documentation could not be provided to support the entity’s verification that the vendors were not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transactions. • One vendor contract expired mid-year and no renewal or extension was initiated. Questioned Costs: Known questioned costs of $77,285 were identified for procurement transactions that did not follow the School District’s procurement procedures and were incurred under an expired contract for which no renewal or extension was initiated. These known questioned costs related to all expenditures occurring after contract expiration, and therefore, should not be projected to a population to determine likely questioned costs. Cause: When discussing the issues noted with management, they said the program director was new and was unaware of the compliance requirements. Effect: The School District is not in compliance with the Uniform Guidance and GaDOE guidance related to CNC. Failure to ensure that expenditures are appropriately approved and procedures to address procurement and suspension and debarment compliance requirements are implemented exposes the School District to unnecessary risk of error and misuse of federal funds and could result in the expenditure of federal funds for unallowable purposes and/or with unqualified vendors. In addition, this deficiency could lead to the return of funding associated with unallowable expenditures. Recommendation: The School District should review current internal control procedures related to CNC. Where vulnerable, the School District should develop and/or modify its policies and procedures to ensure that all expenditures reflect evidence of review and approval, required procurement methods are properly identified and followed, and required procurement and suspension and debarment documentation is properly identified, safeguarded, and retained. In addition, management should develop a monitoring process to ensure that these procedures are operating appropriately. Views of Responsible Officials: We concur with this finding.
FA 2024-001 Strengthen Controls over Expenditures Compliance Requirements: Activities Allowed or Unallowed Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Internal Control Impact: Significant Deficiency Compliance Impact: Nonmaterial Noncompliance Federal Awarding Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Pass-Through Entity: Georgia Department of Education AL Numbers and Titles: 10.553 – School Breakfast Program 10.555 – National School Lunch Program Federal Award Numbers: 225GA324N1099 (Year: 2024), 245GA324N1199 (Year 2024) Questioned Costs: $77,285 Repeat of Prior Year Finding: FA 2023-001 Description: A review of expenditures charged to the Child Nutrition Cluster revealed that the School District’s internal control procedures were not operating appropriately to ensure that expenditures were reviewed and approved and that the School District’s procurement and suspension and debarment procedures were followed. Background Information: The Child Nutrition Cluster (CNC) is comprised of various programs that are intended to assist states in administering and overseeing food service program operators that provide healthful, nutritious meals to eligible children in public and non-profit private schools, residential child care institutions, and summer programs. This Cluster of programs also fosters healthy eating habits in children by providing fresh fruits and fresh vegetables to children attending elementary and secondary schools and encourages the domestic consumption of nutritious agricultural commodities. CNC funding was granted to the Georgia Department of Education (GaDOE) by the U.S. Department of Agriculture. GaDOE is responsible for distributing funds to local educational agencies (LEAs) and overseeing the various CNC programs. CNC funds totaling $2,251,765 were expended and reported on the Berrien County Board of Education’s Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) for fiscal year 2024. Criteria: As a recipient of federal awards, the School District is required to establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance of managing the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal awards pursuant to Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), Section 200.303 – Internal Controls. Provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.403 – Factors Affecting Allowability of Costs state that “costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles, (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items, (c) Be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the non-Federal entity… (g) Be adequately documented…” Additionally, provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.318 – General Procurement Standards state in part that “(a) the non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and… (b) non-Federal entities must maintain oversight to ensure that contractors perform in accordance with the terms, conditions, and specifications of their contracts or purchase orders.” In addition, provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.320 – Methods of Procurement to Be Followed provide guidance for procurement through small purchase procedures and state “If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources.” Condition: A sample of 60 expenditures was randomly selected for testing using a non-statistical sampling approach. These expenditures were reviewed to determine if appropriate internal controls were implemented and applicable compliance requirements were met. The following deficiencies were noted: • For three expenditures, evidence of review and approval was not reflected within the voucher package. • For seven expenditures, there was no verification of receipt of goods documented in the voucher package. Additionally, auditor reviewed 40 of these same expenditures and a sample of 20 additional expenditures, which was randomly selected for testing using a non-statistical sampling approach, to determine if procurement transactions complied with the School District’s procurement procedures and proper oversight was maintained to ensure that contractors were performing according to their contracts. The following deficiencies were noted: • Evidence of review and approval was not reflected within the voucher package for five additional expenditures. • For 19 expenditures paid to four different vendors, documentation could not be provided to support the entity’s verification that the vendors were not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transactions. • One vendor contract expired mid-year and no renewal or extension was initiated. Questioned Costs: Known questioned costs of $77,285 were identified for procurement transactions that did not follow the School District’s procurement procedures and were incurred under an expired contract for which no renewal or extension was initiated. These known questioned costs related to all expenditures occurring after contract expiration, and therefore, should not be projected to a population to determine likely questioned costs. Cause: When discussing the issues noted with management, they said the program director was new and was unaware of the compliance requirements. Effect: The School District is not in compliance with the Uniform Guidance and GaDOE guidance related to CNC. Failure to ensure that expenditures are appropriately approved and procedures to address procurement and suspension and debarment compliance requirements are implemented exposes the School District to unnecessary risk of error and misuse of federal funds and could result in the expenditure of federal funds for unallowable purposes and/or with unqualified vendors. In addition, this deficiency could lead to the return of funding associated with unallowable expenditures. Recommendation: The School District should review current internal control procedures related to CNC. Where vulnerable, the School District should develop and/or modify its policies and procedures to ensure that all expenditures reflect evidence of review and approval, required procurement methods are properly identified and followed, and required procurement and suspension and debarment documentation is properly identified, safeguarded, and retained. In addition, management should develop a monitoring process to ensure that these procedures are operating appropriately. Views of Responsible Officials: We concur with this finding.
2 CFR § 400.1 gives regulatory effect for the U.S. Department of Agriculture to the Office of Management and Budget guidance in subparts A through F of 2 CFR part 200, as supplemented by this part, as USDA policies and procedures for uniform administrative requirements, cost principles, and audit requirement for Federal awards. 2 CFR § 200.303 requires that non-Federal entities receiving Federal awards (i.e., auditee management) establish and maintain effective internal control designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. 2 CFR § 200.320(a)(2) indicates, in part, when the aggregate dollar amount of the procurement transaction is higher than the micro-purchase threshold, but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, simplified acquisition procedures can be used. If simplified acquisition procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined by the recipient or subrecipient. 2 CFR § 200.318(i) indicates the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement transaction. These records must include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Perkins Local School District Board Policy DECA - Administration of Federal Grant Funds indicates all purchases for property and services made using federal funds must be conducted in accordance with all applicable Federal, State and local laws and regulations, the Uniform Guidance, and the District’s written policies and procedures. Purchasing records are sufficiently maintained to detail the history of all procurements and must include at least the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, and contractor selection or rejection; the basis for the contract price; and verification that the contractor is not suspended or debarred. Furthermore, Perkins Local School District Board Policy DJC - Bidding Requirements states that if feasible, all purchases over $5,000 but under $50,000 will be based on price quotations submitted by at least three vendors. Due to a lack of controls over the procurement process, for one out of four (25%) vendors examined during testing of the Child Nutrition Cluster, the District did not obtain quotes from other vendors. The procurements totaled $9,376; therefore, the District’s bidding policy required the District to obtain “quotations submitted by at least three vendors.” Failure to obtain quotations from a variety of vendors may result in the District not utilizing the most cost effective vendor as well as further noncompliance with Federal requirements. The District should adopt procedures to help ensure records are maintained to document the history of the procurement, including the rationale for the purchase method, selection of vendors, cost/price analysis (if applicable) and the reason for limiting competition (if applicable).
2 CFR § 400.1 gives regulatory effect for the U.S. Department of Agriculture to the Office of Management and Budget guidance in subparts A through F of 2 CFR part 200, as supplemented by this part, as USDA policies and procedures for uniform administrative requirements, cost principles, and audit requirement for Federal awards. 2 CFR § 200.303 requires that non-Federal entities receiving Federal awards (i.e., auditee management) establish and maintain effective internal control designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. 2 CFR § 200.320(a)(2) indicates, in part, when the aggregate dollar amount of the procurement transaction is higher than the micro-purchase threshold, but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, simplified acquisition procedures can be used. If simplified acquisition procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined by the recipient or subrecipient. 2 CFR § 200.318(i) indicates the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement transaction. These records must include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Perkins Local School District Board Policy DECA - Administration of Federal Grant Funds indicates all purchases for property and services made using federal funds must be conducted in accordance with all applicable Federal, State and local laws and regulations, the Uniform Guidance, and the District’s written policies and procedures. Purchasing records are sufficiently maintained to detail the history of all procurements and must include at least the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, and contractor selection or rejection; the basis for the contract price; and verification that the contractor is not suspended or debarred. Furthermore, Perkins Local School District Board Policy DJC - Bidding Requirements states that if feasible, all purchases over $5,000 but under $50,000 will be based on price quotations submitted by at least three vendors. Due to a lack of controls over the procurement process, for one out of four (25%) vendors examined during testing of the Child Nutrition Cluster, the District did not obtain quotes from other vendors. The procurements totaled $9,376; therefore, the District’s bidding policy required the District to obtain “quotations submitted by at least three vendors.” Failure to obtain quotations from a variety of vendors may result in the District not utilizing the most cost effective vendor as well as further noncompliance with Federal requirements. The District should adopt procedures to help ensure records are maintained to document the history of the procurement, including the rationale for the purchase method, selection of vendors, cost/price analysis (if applicable) and the reason for limiting competition (if applicable).
2 CFR § 400.1 gives regulatory effect for the U.S. Department of Agriculture to the Office of Management and Budget guidance in subparts A through F of 2 CFR part 200, as supplemented by this part, as USDA policies and procedures for uniform administrative requirements, cost principles, and audit requirement for Federal awards. 2 CFR § 200.303 requires that non-Federal entities receiving Federal awards (i.e., auditee management) establish and maintain effective internal control designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. 2 CFR § 200.320(a)(2) indicates, in part, when the aggregate dollar amount of the procurement transaction is higher than the micro-purchase threshold, but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, simplified acquisition procedures can be used. If simplified acquisition procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined by the recipient or subrecipient. 2 CFR § 200.318(i) indicates the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement transaction. These records must include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Perkins Local School District Board Policy DECA - Administration of Federal Grant Funds indicates all purchases for property and services made using federal funds must be conducted in accordance with all applicable Federal, State and local laws and regulations, the Uniform Guidance, and the District’s written policies and procedures. Purchasing records are sufficiently maintained to detail the history of all procurements and must include at least the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, and contractor selection or rejection; the basis for the contract price; and verification that the contractor is not suspended or debarred. Furthermore, Perkins Local School District Board Policy DJC - Bidding Requirements states that if feasible, all purchases over $5,000 but under $50,000 will be based on price quotations submitted by at least three vendors. Due to a lack of controls over the procurement process, for one out of four (25%) vendors examined during testing of the Child Nutrition Cluster, the District did not obtain quotes from other vendors. The procurements totaled $9,376; therefore, the District’s bidding policy required the District to obtain “quotations submitted by at least three vendors.” Failure to obtain quotations from a variety of vendors may result in the District not utilizing the most cost effective vendor as well as further noncompliance with Federal requirements. The District should adopt procedures to help ensure records are maintained to document the history of the procurement, including the rationale for the purchase method, selection of vendors, cost/price analysis (if applicable) and the reason for limiting competition (if applicable).
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program Title: Health Center Program Cluster Assistance Listing Numbers: 93.224 and 93.527 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: H80CS00109-22; H80CS00109-23 Award Period: May 1, 2023 – April 30, 2024; May 1, 2024 – April 30, 2025 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR section 200.320 outlines the acceptable methods of procurement. Purchases below the simplified acquisition threshold, but above the micro-purchase threshold, require that price or rate quotations be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. Noncompetitive procurement can be used in certain circumstances however the non-Federal entity is to maintain appropriate supporting documentation justifying the use of sole source procurement consistent with 2 CFR 200.320(c). Condition: The organization did not maintain appropriate documentation to support the procurement method utilized for a contract selected for testing. Questioned costs: None Context: One (1) of five (5) procurement transactions selected for testing. Cause: The Organization did not create and maintain appropriate documentation to support the method of procurement utilized, including the consideration of an adequate number of qualified sources. Effect: Possible noncompliance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)(1) - (3) Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the Organization consistently follow its established policies and procedures related to the maintaining of necessary documentation to support the method of procurement utilized. The Organization may also consider qualifying multiple vendors for particular goods/service and then utilizing an approved vendors list. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with this finding.
2024-005 — Procurement – Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance and Noncompliance (Repeat of Finding 2023-006 and 2022-004) Federal program information: Funding agencies: U.S. Department of Interior and U.S. Department of Education Titles: Assistance to Tribally Controlled Community Colleges; Higher Education Institutional Aid; and Education Stabilization Fund ALN Number: 15.027, 84.031, and 84.425 Award years: Various Criteria: According to 2 CFR Section 200.318i, the recipient or subrecipient must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of each procurement transaction. These records must include the rationale for the procurement method, contract type selection, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. According to 2 CFR Section 0200.319a, all procurement transactions under the federal award must be conducted in a manner that provides full and open competition. Condition: The College did not maintain records sufficient to detail the history of each procurement transaction for the nine procurements contracts tested. Cause: The College did not have sufficient procedures in place to ensure that procurement records are maintained. Effect: The College is not in compliance with procurement requirements. Questioned Costs: None Context: Procurement documents were not retained for nine out of nine transactions tested. Recommendation: Formally document and enforce policies and procedures that will promote adequate monitoring of the procurement and bidding process. Ensure that any contract over the College’s threshold ($150,000) follow the sealed bid requirements listed in 2 CFR Section 200.320b1. Management’s Response: The College will follow its policies as required.
2024-005 — Procurement – Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance and Noncompliance (Repeat of Finding 2023-006 and 2022-004) Federal program information: Funding agencies: U.S. Department of Interior and U.S. Department of Education Titles: Assistance to Tribally Controlled Community Colleges; Higher Education Institutional Aid; and Education Stabilization Fund ALN Number: 15.027, 84.031, and 84.425 Award years: Various Criteria: According to 2 CFR Section 200.318i, the recipient or subrecipient must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of each procurement transaction. These records must include the rationale for the procurement method, contract type selection, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. According to 2 CFR Section 0200.319a, all procurement transactions under the federal award must be conducted in a manner that provides full and open competition. Condition: The College did not maintain records sufficient to detail the history of each procurement transaction for the nine procurements contracts tested. Cause: The College did not have sufficient procedures in place to ensure that procurement records are maintained. Effect: The College is not in compliance with procurement requirements. Questioned Costs: None Context: Procurement documents were not retained for nine out of nine transactions tested. Recommendation: Formally document and enforce policies and procedures that will promote adequate monitoring of the procurement and bidding process. Ensure that any contract over the College’s threshold ($150,000) follow the sealed bid requirements listed in 2 CFR Section 200.320b1. Management’s Response: The College will follow its policies as required.
2024-005 — Procurement – Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance and Noncompliance (Repeat of Finding 2023-006 and 2022-004) Federal program information: Funding agencies: U.S. Department of Interior and U.S. Department of Education Titles: Assistance to Tribally Controlled Community Colleges; Higher Education Institutional Aid; and Education Stabilization Fund ALN Number: 15.027, 84.031, and 84.425 Award years: Various Criteria: According to 2 CFR Section 200.318i, the recipient or subrecipient must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of each procurement transaction. These records must include the rationale for the procurement method, contract type selection, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. According to 2 CFR Section 0200.319a, all procurement transactions under the federal award must be conducted in a manner that provides full and open competition. Condition: The College did not maintain records sufficient to detail the history of each procurement transaction for the nine procurements contracts tested. Cause: The College did not have sufficient procedures in place to ensure that procurement records are maintained. Effect: The College is not in compliance with procurement requirements. Questioned Costs: None Context: Procurement documents were not retained for nine out of nine transactions tested. Recommendation: Formally document and enforce policies and procedures that will promote adequate monitoring of the procurement and bidding process. Ensure that any contract over the College’s threshold ($150,000) follow the sealed bid requirements listed in 2 CFR Section 200.320b1. Management’s Response: The College will follow its policies as required.
2024-005 — Procurement – Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance and Noncompliance (Repeat of Finding 2023-006 and 2022-004) Federal program information: Funding agencies: U.S. Department of Interior and U.S. Department of Education Titles: Assistance to Tribally Controlled Community Colleges; Higher Education Institutional Aid; and Education Stabilization Fund ALN Number: 15.027, 84.031, and 84.425 Award years: Various Criteria: According to 2 CFR Section 200.318i, the recipient or subrecipient must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of each procurement transaction. These records must include the rationale for the procurement method, contract type selection, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. According to 2 CFR Section 0200.319a, all procurement transactions under the federal award must be conducted in a manner that provides full and open competition. Condition: The College did not maintain records sufficient to detail the history of each procurement transaction for the nine procurements contracts tested. Cause: The College did not have sufficient procedures in place to ensure that procurement records are maintained. Effect: The College is not in compliance with procurement requirements. Questioned Costs: None Context: Procurement documents were not retained for nine out of nine transactions tested. Recommendation: Formally document and enforce policies and procedures that will promote adequate monitoring of the procurement and bidding process. Ensure that any contract over the College’s threshold ($150,000) follow the sealed bid requirements listed in 2 CFR Section 200.320b1. Management’s Response: The College will follow its policies as required.
2024-005 — Procurement – Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance and Noncompliance (Repeat of Finding 2023-006 and 2022-004) Federal program information: Funding agencies: U.S. Department of Interior and U.S. Department of Education Titles: Assistance to Tribally Controlled Community Colleges; Higher Education Institutional Aid; and Education Stabilization Fund ALN Number: 15.027, 84.031, and 84.425 Award years: Various Criteria: According to 2 CFR Section 200.318i, the recipient or subrecipient must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of each procurement transaction. These records must include the rationale for the procurement method, contract type selection, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. According to 2 CFR Section 0200.319a, all procurement transactions under the federal award must be conducted in a manner that provides full and open competition. Condition: The College did not maintain records sufficient to detail the history of each procurement transaction for the nine procurements contracts tested. Cause: The College did not have sufficient procedures in place to ensure that procurement records are maintained. Effect: The College is not in compliance with procurement requirements. Questioned Costs: None Context: Procurement documents were not retained for nine out of nine transactions tested. Recommendation: Formally document and enforce policies and procedures that will promote adequate monitoring of the procurement and bidding process. Ensure that any contract over the College’s threshold ($150,000) follow the sealed bid requirements listed in 2 CFR Section 200.320b1. Management’s Response: The College will follow its policies as required.
Prior Year Finding: 2023-004 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Federal Program: COVID 19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Relief Fund Assistance Listing: 21.027 Pass-Through Entity: Maryland Department of Housing and Community Development Pass-Through Award Number and Period: (7/1/2023 6/30/2024) Compliance Requirement: Procurement Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance, Material Noncompliance (Modified Opinion) Criteria or Specific Requirement: Control: Per 2 CFR Section 200.303(a), a non-Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should comply with guidance in "Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government" issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the "Internal Control Integrated Framework", issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Compliance: Per 2 CFR section 200.318, a non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. Per 2 CFR section 200.319, all procurement transactions for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award must be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition consistent with the standards of this section and § 200.320. Per the Towns purchasing policy, goods or services costing $10,000 or more must be purchased from the lowest responsive bidder meeting specifications after advertising for bids. Condition/Context: The Town failed to provide documentation supporting compliance with required procurement processes for goods or services exceeding $10,000 for five out of five vendors tested. This includes a lack of evidence on how these vendors were selected and whether the procurement process ensured full and open competition. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Cause: The Town's internal controls were not sufficient to ensure that procurement policies were followed for purchases made for the program. Effect: Failure to adhere to procurement policies and procedures may result in obtaining goods or services under terms that are not in the best interest of the federal program. Recommendation: We recommend that the Town enhance its procedures and internal controls to ensure that it verifies vendors are not suspended or debarred from business prior to all goods and services charged to the program. The Town should retain documentation of procurement suspension/debarment status verifications for its vendors audit purposes. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding.
FA 2024-001 Strengthen Controls over Expenditures Compliance Requirements: Activities Allowed or Unallowed Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Internal Control Impact: Significant Deficiency Compliance Impact: Nonmaterial Noncompliance Federal Awarding Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Pass-Through Entity: Georgia Department of Education AL Numbers and Titles: 10.553 – School Breakfast Program 10.555 – National School Lunch Program Federal Award Numbers: 245GA324N1199 (Year: 2024), 235GA32N1099 (Year: 2023) Questioned Costs: $7,388 Description: A review of expenditures charged to the Child Nutrition Cluster revealed that the School District’s internal control procedures were not operating appropriately to ensure that expenditures were reviewed and approved and that the School District’s procurement and suspension and debarment procedures were followed. Background Information: The Child Nutrition Cluster (CNC) is comprised of various programs that are intended to assist states in administering and overseeing food service program operators that provide healthful, nutritious meals to eligible children in public and non-profit private schools, residential childcare institutions, and summer programs. This Cluster of programs also fosters healthy eating habits in children by providing fresh fruits and fresh vegetables to children attending elementary and secondary schools and encourages the domestic consumption of nutritious agricultural commodities. CNC funding was granted to the Georgia Department of Education (GaDOE) by the U.S. Department of Agriculture. GaDOE is responsible for distributing funds to local educational agencies (LEAs) and overseeing the various CNC programs. CNC funds totaling $1,087,437.24 were expended and reported on the Wilkinson County Board of Education’s Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) for fiscal year 2024. Criteria: As a recipient of federal awards, the School District is required to establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance of managing the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal awards pursuant to Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), Section 200.303 – Internal Controls. Provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.403 – Factors Affecting Allowability of Costs state that “costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles, (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items, (c) Be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the non-Federal entity… (g) Be adequately documented…” Additionally, provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.318 – General Procurement Standards state in part that “(a) the non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and… (b) non-Federal entities must maintain oversight to ensure that contractors perform in accordance with the terms, conditions, and specifications of their contracts or purchase orders.” In addition, provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.320 – Methods of Procurement to Be Followed provide guidance for procurement through small purchase procedures and state “If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources.” Condition: A sample of 39 expenditures was randomly selected for testing using a non-statistical sampling approach. These expenditures were reviewed to determine if appropriate internal controls were implemented and applicable compliance requirements were met. For eight of the 10 sample expenditures that were incurred outside of the School District’s Co-Op process, evidence of review and approval was not reflected within the voucher package. Additionally, auditor reviewed five of these same expenditures and a sample of 29 additional expenditures, which was randomly selected for testing using a non-statistical sampling approach, to determine if procurement transactions complied with the School District’s procurement procedures and proper oversight was maintained to ensure that contractors were performing according to their contracts. The following deficiencies were noted with expenditures incurred outside of the School District’s Co-Op process: • Evidence of review and approval was not reflected within the voucher package and/or purchase files for 17 additional expenditures. • The School District could not provide evidence that an adequate number of rate or price quotations were obtained from qualified sources for eight small purchase expenditures reviewed. Questioned Costs: Upon testing a sample of $14,237 in procurement transactions that were incurred outside of the School District’s Co-Op process, known questioned costs of $7,388 were identified for expenditures that did not follow the School District’s procurement procedures. Using the population of procurements that were incurred outside of the School District’s Co-Op process of $56,274, we project the likely questioned costs to be approximately $29,200. Cause: The School District did not follow its policies and procedures that govern the nonpersonal services expenditure process for federal programs. Effect: The School District is not in compliance with the Uniform Guidance and GaDOE guidance related to CNC. Failure to ensure that expenditures are appropriately approved and procedures to address procurement and suspension and debarment compliance requirements are implemented exposes the School District to unnecessary risk of error and misuse of federal funds and could result in the expenditure of federal funds for unallowable purposes and/or with unqualified vendors. In addition, this deficiency could lead to the return of funding associated with unallowable expenditures. Recommendation: The School District should review current internal control procedures related to CNC. Where vulnerable, the School District should develop and/or modify its policies and procedures to ensure that all expenditures reflect evidence of review and approval, required procurement methods are properly identified and followed and required procurement and suspension and debarment documentation is properly identified, safeguarded, and retained. In addition, management should develop a monitoring process to ensure that these procedures are operating appropriately. Views of Responsible Officials: We concur with this finding.
FA 2024-001 Strengthen Controls over Expenditures Compliance Requirements: Activities Allowed or Unallowed Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Internal Control Impact: Significant Deficiency Compliance Impact: Nonmaterial Noncompliance Federal Awarding Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Pass-Through Entity: Georgia Department of Education AL Numbers and Titles: 10.553 – School Breakfast Program 10.555 – National School Lunch Program Federal Award Numbers: 245GA324N1199 (Year: 2024), 235GA32N1099 (Year: 2023) Questioned Costs: $7,388 Description: A review of expenditures charged to the Child Nutrition Cluster revealed that the School District’s internal control procedures were not operating appropriately to ensure that expenditures were reviewed and approved and that the School District’s procurement and suspension and debarment procedures were followed. Background Information: The Child Nutrition Cluster (CNC) is comprised of various programs that are intended to assist states in administering and overseeing food service program operators that provide healthful, nutritious meals to eligible children in public and non-profit private schools, residential childcare institutions, and summer programs. This Cluster of programs also fosters healthy eating habits in children by providing fresh fruits and fresh vegetables to children attending elementary and secondary schools and encourages the domestic consumption of nutritious agricultural commodities. CNC funding was granted to the Georgia Department of Education (GaDOE) by the U.S. Department of Agriculture. GaDOE is responsible for distributing funds to local educational agencies (LEAs) and overseeing the various CNC programs. CNC funds totaling $1,087,437.24 were expended and reported on the Wilkinson County Board of Education’s Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) for fiscal year 2024. Criteria: As a recipient of federal awards, the School District is required to establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance of managing the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal awards pursuant to Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), Section 200.303 – Internal Controls. Provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.403 – Factors Affecting Allowability of Costs state that “costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles, (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items, (c) Be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the non-Federal entity… (g) Be adequately documented…” Additionally, provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.318 – General Procurement Standards state in part that “(a) the non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and… (b) non-Federal entities must maintain oversight to ensure that contractors perform in accordance with the terms, conditions, and specifications of their contracts or purchase orders.” In addition, provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.320 – Methods of Procurement to Be Followed provide guidance for procurement through small purchase procedures and state “If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources.” Condition: A sample of 39 expenditures was randomly selected for testing using a non-statistical sampling approach. These expenditures were reviewed to determine if appropriate internal controls were implemented and applicable compliance requirements were met. For eight of the 10 sample expenditures that were incurred outside of the School District’s Co-Op process, evidence of review and approval was not reflected within the voucher package. Additionally, auditor reviewed five of these same expenditures and a sample of 29 additional expenditures, which was randomly selected for testing using a non-statistical sampling approach, to determine if procurement transactions complied with the School District’s procurement procedures and proper oversight was maintained to ensure that contractors were performing according to their contracts. The following deficiencies were noted with expenditures incurred outside of the School District’s Co-Op process: • Evidence of review and approval was not reflected within the voucher package and/or purchase files for 17 additional expenditures. • The School District could not provide evidence that an adequate number of rate or price quotations were obtained from qualified sources for eight small purchase expenditures reviewed. Questioned Costs: Upon testing a sample of $14,237 in procurement transactions that were incurred outside of the School District’s Co-Op process, known questioned costs of $7,388 were identified for expenditures that did not follow the School District’s procurement procedures. Using the population of procurements that were incurred outside of the School District’s Co-Op process of $56,274, we project the likely questioned costs to be approximately $29,200. Cause: The School District did not follow its policies and procedures that govern the nonpersonal services expenditure process for federal programs. Effect: The School District is not in compliance with the Uniform Guidance and GaDOE guidance related to CNC. Failure to ensure that expenditures are appropriately approved and procedures to address procurement and suspension and debarment compliance requirements are implemented exposes the School District to unnecessary risk of error and misuse of federal funds and could result in the expenditure of federal funds for unallowable purposes and/or with unqualified vendors. In addition, this deficiency could lead to the return of funding associated with unallowable expenditures. Recommendation: The School District should review current internal control procedures related to CNC. Where vulnerable, the School District should develop and/or modify its policies and procedures to ensure that all expenditures reflect evidence of review and approval, required procurement methods are properly identified and followed and required procurement and suspension and debarment documentation is properly identified, safeguarded, and retained. In addition, management should develop a monitoring process to ensure that these procedures are operating appropriately. Views of Responsible Officials: We concur with this finding.
Criteria or specific requirement: Federal regulations require that for acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the nonfederal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR 200.320(c); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR 200.320(d); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source), but only when one or more of four circumstances are met in accordance with 2 CFR 200.320(f). Condition: For one of the four contracts tested, the Organization followed its internal policy allowing for preferred vendor selection, which states frequently used vendors can be vetted in advance of use and can eliminate the need for bids; however, the contract exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold and must follow formal procurement methods. Formal procurement methods are competitive and require public notice. The Organization did not meet the criteria in 2 CFR 200.320(f) for noncompetitive procurement. Context: Of the four vendors that had expenditures greater than $25,000, we selected four vendors for procurement testing. One of the four vendors had a contract that exceeded the simplified acquisition threshold. The total value of the contract award is $663,190, the amount committed in future years is $442,127 and the questioned costs during the year ended June 30, 2024 totaled $221,063. Effect: The Organization awarded a contract to a vendor that exceeded the simplified acquisition threshold. This project did not follow the required formal procurement process. Cause: There were ineffective controls in place during the period, along with lack of management oversight. Repeat finding: No Recommendation: The Organization should ensure that all contracts exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold follow procurement methods outlined in 2 CFR 200.320. Additionally, the Organization should implement controls to verify and maintain documentation of contract approvals to ensure compliance with federal regulations under 2 CFR 200.320. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the auditor recommendation
Criteria or specific requirement: Federal regulations require that for acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the nonfederal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR 200.320(c); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR 200.320(d); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source), but only when one or more of four circumstances are met in accordance with 2 CFR 200.320(f). Condition: For one of the four contracts tested, the Organization followed its internal policy allowing for preferred vendor selection, which states frequently used vendors can be vetted in advance of use and can eliminate the need for bids; however, the contract exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold and must follow formal procurement methods. Formal procurement methods are competitive and require public notice. The Organization did not meet the criteria in 2 CFR 200.320(f) for noncompetitive procurement. Context: Of the four vendors that had expenditures greater than $25,000, we selected four vendors for procurement testing. One of the four vendors had a contract that exceeded the simplified acquisition threshold. The total value of the contract award is $663,190, the amount committed in future years is $442,127 and the questioned costs during the year ended June 30, 2024 totaled $221,063. Effect: The Organization awarded a contract to a vendor that exceeded the simplified acquisition threshold. This project did not follow the required formal procurement process. Cause: There were ineffective controls in place during the period, along with lack of management oversight. Repeat finding: No Recommendation: The Organization should ensure that all contracts exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold follow procurement methods outlined in 2 CFR 200.320. Additionally, the Organization should implement controls to verify and maintain documentation of contract approvals to ensure compliance with federal regulations under 2 CFR 200.320. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the auditor recommendation
Criteria or specific requirement: Federal regulations require that for acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the nonfederal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR 200.320(c); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR 200.320(d); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source), but only when one or more of four circumstances are met in accordance with 2 CFR 200.320(f). Condition: For one of the four contracts tested, the Organization followed its internal policy allowing for preferred vendor selection, which states frequently used vendors can be vetted in advance of use and can eliminate the need for bids; however, the contract exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold and must follow formal procurement methods. Formal procurement methods are competitive and require public notice. The Organization did not meet the criteria in 2 CFR 200.320(f) for noncompetitive procurement. Context: Of the four vendors that had expenditures greater than $25,000, we selected four vendors for procurement testing. One of the four vendors had a contract that exceeded the simplified acquisition threshold. The total value of the contract award is $663,190, the amount committed in future years is $442,127 and the questioned costs during the year ended June 30, 2024 totaled $221,063. Effect: The Organization awarded a contract to a vendor that exceeded the simplified acquisition threshold. This project did not follow the required formal procurement process. Cause: There were ineffective controls in place during the period, along with lack of management oversight. Repeat finding: No Recommendation: The Organization should ensure that all contracts exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold follow procurement methods outlined in 2 CFR 200.320. Additionally, the Organization should implement controls to verify and maintain documentation of contract approvals to ensure compliance with federal regulations under 2 CFR 200.320. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the auditor recommendation
Criteria or specific requirement: Federal regulations require that for acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the nonfederal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR 200.320(c); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR 200.320(d); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source), but only when one or more of four circumstances are met in accordance with 2 CFR 200.320(f). Condition: For one of the four contracts tested, the Organization followed its internal policy allowing for preferred vendor selection, which states frequently used vendors can be vetted in advance of use and can eliminate the need for bids; however, the contract exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold and must follow formal procurement methods. Formal procurement methods are competitive and require public notice. The Organization did not meet the criteria in 2 CFR 200.320(f) for noncompetitive procurement. Context: Of the four vendors that had expenditures greater than $25,000, we selected four vendors for procurement testing. One of the four vendors had a contract that exceeded the simplified acquisition threshold. The total value of the contract award is $663,190, the amount committed in future years is $442,127 and the questioned costs during the year ended June 30, 2024 totaled $221,063. Effect: The Organization awarded a contract to a vendor that exceeded the simplified acquisition threshold. This project did not follow the required formal procurement process. Cause: There were ineffective controls in place during the period, along with lack of management oversight. Repeat finding: No Recommendation: The Organization should ensure that all contracts exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold follow procurement methods outlined in 2 CFR 200.320. Additionally, the Organization should implement controls to verify and maintain documentation of contract approvals to ensure compliance with federal regulations under 2 CFR 200.320. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the auditor recommendation
Condition: Expenditures for federal programs did not follow the non-federal entities procedures before entering a covered transaction. Two (2) disbursements totaling $28,882 were not properly encumbered in accordance with state statute. Cause of Condition: Policies and procedures have not been designed and implemented to ensure federal expenditures are made in accordance with federal compliance requirements. Effect of Condition: This condition could result in noncompliance to grant requirements and could lead to a loss of federal funds to the County. Recommendation: OSAI recommends the County gain an understanding of the grant requirements for this program and implement internal controls to ensure compliance with these grant requirements. Management Response: Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners: I plan to communicate with the Budget Board regarding this finding and have already introduced to the Budget Board, a form guideline called “Payne County Grant Administration Plan” to aid in proper documentation, reporting and proper spending of all grant awards. County Clerk: The Payne County Budget Board has approved and adopted a Federal Funding Checklist as well as Federal Funding guidelines on agreements and awards. The Payne County Clerk’s office also communicates with each department and requests that they report to our office any Federal Grants and Awards they receive and report those on their SEFA annually to our office. We also communicate with the Treasurer’s office and request to know when any Federal money has been received. Criteria: Compliance and Reporting Guidance, State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (8. Procurement, Suspension & Debarment.) reads as follows: Recipients are responsible for ensuring that any procurement using SLFRF funds, or payments under procurement contracts using such funds, are consistent with the procurement standards set forth in the Uniform Guidance at 2 CFR 200.317 through 2 CFR 200.327, unless stated otherwise by Treasury. As outlined in FAQ 13.15, only a subset of the Uniform Guidance requirements at 2 CFR Part 200 Subpart D (Post Federal AwardRequirements) applies to recipients’ use of funds in the revenue loss eligible use category. The procurement standards set forth in the Uniform Guidance at 2 CRF 200.317 through 2 CRF 200.327 are not included in FAQ 13.15’s list of applicable Subpart D requirements that apply to recipients’ use of funds in the revenue loss eligible use category. The Uniform Guidance establishes in 2 CFR 200.319 that all procurement transactions for property or services must be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition, consistent with standards outlined in 2 CFR 200.320, which allows for non-competitive procurements only in certain circumstances. Recipients must have and use documented procurement procedures that are consistent with the standards outlined in 2 CFR 200.317 through 2 CFR 200.320. In addition, the Uniform Guidance at 2 CFR 200.214, 2 CFR Part 180, and Treasury’s implementing regulations at 31 CFR Part 19, prohibit recipients from entering into contracts with suspended or debarred parties. The procurement standards outlined in the Uniform Guidance require an infrastructure for competitive bidding and contractor oversight, including maintaining written standards of conduct. Your organization must ensure adherence to all applicable local, State, and federal procurement laws and regulations. Further, 2 CFR § 200.319 Competition (d) reads as follows: The non-Federal entity must have written procedures for procurement transactions.
Item 2024-004: Procurement Identification of federal programs: Food Distribution Cluster, Assistance Listing Number 10.565, 10.568 and 10.569 Federal award grant number: 204645, 244603 and 244590 Federal agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Pass-through entity: Minnesota Department of Health and Minnesota Department of Human Services Criteria: The Uniform Guidance (2 CFR 200.320) and SHN’s procurement policy require that micropurchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive quotations if SHN considers the price to be reasonable and small purchases require price or rate quotations to be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. Condition: During our testing of procurement requirements, we noted that for two of the small purchase disbursements selected for testing, there was no vendor selection form. The vendor selection form identifies the price and the method selected as well as requires review and approval. Without the form, the procurement documentation does not exist for small purchase disbursements. Cause: The exceptions noted above were due to a breakdown in SHN’s procedures to ensure that all procurements of goods and services are in accordance with the Uniform Guidance and its procurement policy. Effect: Improper procurement procedures can result in actions taken by oversight agencies which could impact future funding. Questioned costs: $37,043 Context: The population subject to procurement requirements included 66 micro-purchase vendors and ten small purchase vendors. The sample size of seven micro-purchase procurements and two small purchase procurements was determined using the guidance in the AICPA Audit and Accounting Guide— Government Auditing Standards and Single Audits. Repeat finding: No Recommendation: SHN should continue to improve its procedures to ensure that all procurements of goods and services are in accordance with the Uniform Guidance and its procurement policy. It is also recommended that support documenting the procurements be maintained. Views of responsible officials of the auditee: SHN concurs with this finding and a response is included in the corrective action plan.
2024-018 Noncompliance with Procurement Requirements Grantor Department of Treasury - Assistance Listing 21.027 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF) Grant Period – Year ended June 30, 2024 First reported 2024 Type Material Weakness, Noncompliance Condition During the audit of the procurement processes, it was identified that the Town may not have fully complied with the federal regulations governing procurement. During the year ended December 31, 2024, the Town paid one contractor a sum of $85,476 for water and sewer system repairs as necessary. The Town did not provide a contract for audit or evidence that it obtained price or rate quotations from an adequate number of qualified sources. Criteria Federal regulations generally require procurement transactions to be conducted in a manner that provides full and open competition, unless specific exceptions apply. Contracts are typically necessary to formalize the procurement relationship and ensure compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of a federal award. According to 2 CFR section 200.320, the micro-purchase method allows for procurements where the aggregate dollar amount does not exceed $10,000, and these purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive quotations if the nonfederal entity considers the price to be reasonable. For small purchase procedures, which apply to purchases exceeding the micro-purchase amount but not exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold of $250,000, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. Cause Management believed the requirement for small purchases did not apply to routine water and sewer system repairs since the individual invoices did not exceed $10,000 in most cases. Effect Noncompliance may lead to the disallowance of costs, where the federal agency may refuse to reimburse noncompliant costs or require refunds. Questioned Costs $85,476 Recommendation To ensure compliance with federal procurement standards, it is recommended that the Town implement procedures to ensure that price or rate quotations are obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources for all small purchases, thereby promoting full and open competition. Management's Response See management’s corrective action plan.
FA 2024-001 Strengthen Controls over Expenditures Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Internal Control Impact: Material Weakness Compliance Impact: Material Noncompliance Federal Awarding Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Pass-Through Entity: Georgia Department of Education AL Numbers and Titles: 10.553 – School Breakfast Program 10.555 – National School Lunch Program Federal Award Numbers: 235GA324N1099 (Year: 2024), 245GA324N1199 (Year: 2024) Questioned Costs: $46,877.67 Description: A review of expenditures charged to the Child Nutrition Cluster revealed that the School District’s internal control procedures were not operating appropriately to ensure that the School District’s procurement procedures were followed. Background Information: The Child Nutrition Cluster (CNC) is comprised of various programs that are intended to assist states in administering and overseeing food service program operators that provide healthful, nutritious meals to eligible children in public and non-profit private schools, residential child care institutions, and summer programs. This Cluster of programs also fosters healthy eating habits in children by providing fresh fruits and fresh vegetables to children attending elementary and secondary schools and encourages the domestic consumption of nutritious agricultural commodities. CNC funding was granted to the Georgia Department of Education (GaDOE) by the U.S. Department of Agriculture. GaDOE is responsible for distributing funds to local educational agencies (LEAs) and overseeing the various CNC programs. CNC funds totaling $1,204,722 were expended and reported on the Terrell County Board of Education’s Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) for fiscal year 2024. Criteria: As a recipient of federal awards, the School District is required to establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance of managing the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal awards pursuant to Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), Section 200.303 – Internal Controls. Additionally, provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.318 – General Procurement Standards state in part that “(a) the non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and… (b) non-Federal entities must maintain oversight to ensure that contractors perform in accordance with the terms, conditions, and specifications of their contracts or purchase orders.” In addition, provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.320 – Methods of Procurement to Be Followed provide guidance for procurement through small purchase procedures and state “If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources.” Condition: A sample of 47 procurement transactions was randomly selected for testing using a non-statistical sampling approach. These transactions were reviewed to determine if appropriate internal controls were implemented and applicable compliance requirements were met. The School District could not provide evidence that an adequate number of rate or price quotations were obtained from qualified sources for 18 small purchase expenditures reviewed. Questioned Costs: Upon testing a sample of $192,188.67 in procurement transactions, known questioned costs of $46,877.67 were identified for expenditures that did not follow the School District’s procurement procedures. Using the total population of $681,669.21 in procurement transactions, we project the likely questioned costs to be approximately $166,269.24. The following Assistance Listing Numbers were affected by known and likely questioned costs: 10.553 and 10.555. Cause: When discussing the issues noted with management, they indicated that School District personnel did not maintain sufficient documentation to support that multiple quotations were obtained. Effect: The School District is not in compliance with the Uniform Guidance and GaDOE guidance. Failure to appropriately implement procedures to address procurement compliance requirements exposes the School District to unnecessary risk of error and misuse of federal funds and could result in the expenditure of federal funds with unqualified vendors. In addition, this deficiency could lead to the return of funding associated with unallowable expenditures. Recommendation: The School District should evaluate and improve internal control procedures to ensure that required procurement methods are properly identified and followed. In addition, management should develop a monitoring process to ensure that these procedures are operating appropriately. Views of Responsible Officials: We concur with this finding.