FINDING 2024-002 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster (IDEA) - Procurement Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY2023, FY2024 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for goods or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is customarily set at $250,000. However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold of $150,000 or less for when small purchase procedures may be used. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. If it is determined a single source provider can be used for a small purchase, documentation must be retained supporting the determination. Two vendors that exceeded the small purchase threshold during the audit period were selected for testing. In both cases, the School Corporation was unable to provide documentation of three quotes obtained from vendors for the specific purchases that were made. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(i) states: "The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures , consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases — (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." Cause The School Corporation's management had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement compliance requirement over small purchases. The School Corporation indicated they originally did not intend to spend that much with those vendors, but due to circumstances, ended spending over the small purchase threshold. Effect The failure to establish an effective internal control system enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. As a result, adequate documentation was not retained for procurements that fell within the small purchase threshold. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure all required documentation is retained and provided for small purchases. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-002 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster (IDEA) - Procurement Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY2023, FY2024 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for goods or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is customarily set at $250,000. However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold of $150,000 or less for when small purchase procedures may be used. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. If it is determined a single source provider can be used for a small purchase, documentation must be retained supporting the determination. Two vendors that exceeded the small purchase threshold during the audit period were selected for testing. In both cases, the School Corporation was unable to provide documentation of three quotes obtained from vendors for the specific purchases that were made. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(i) states: "The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures , consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases — (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." Cause The School Corporation's management had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement compliance requirement over small purchases. The School Corporation indicated they originally did not intend to spend that much with those vendors, but due to circumstances, ended spending over the small purchase threshold. Effect The failure to establish an effective internal control system enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. As a result, adequate documentation was not retained for procurements that fell within the small purchase threshold. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure all required documentation is retained and provided for small purchases. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-002 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster (IDEA) - Procurement Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY2023, FY2024 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for goods or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is customarily set at $250,000. However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold of $150,000 or less for when small purchase procedures may be used. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. If it is determined a single source provider can be used for a small purchase, documentation must be retained supporting the determination. Two vendors that exceeded the small purchase threshold during the audit period were selected for testing. In both cases, the School Corporation was unable to provide documentation of three quotes obtained from vendors for the specific purchases that were made. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(i) states: "The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures , consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases — (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." Cause The School Corporation's management had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement compliance requirement over small purchases. The School Corporation indicated they originally did not intend to spend that much with those vendors, but due to circumstances, ended spending over the small purchase threshold. Effect The failure to establish an effective internal control system enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. As a result, adequate documentation was not retained for procurements that fell within the small purchase threshold. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure all required documentation is retained and provided for small purchases. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-002 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster (IDEA) - Procurement Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY2023, FY2024 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for goods or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is customarily set at $250,000. However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold of $150,000 or less for when small purchase procedures may be used. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. If it is determined a single source provider can be used for a small purchase, documentation must be retained supporting the determination. Two vendors that exceeded the small purchase threshold during the audit period were selected for testing. In both cases, the School Corporation was unable to provide documentation of three quotes obtained from vendors for the specific purchases that were made. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(i) states: "The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures , consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases — (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." Cause The School Corporation's management had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement compliance requirement over small purchases. The School Corporation indicated they originally did not intend to spend that much with those vendors, but due to circumstances, ended spending over the small purchase threshold. Effect The failure to establish an effective internal control system enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. As a result, adequate documentation was not retained for procurements that fell within the small purchase threshold. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure all required documentation is retained and provided for small purchases. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
CONDITION: The Leechburg Area School District contracted with TriMark for the purchase and installation of a dishwasher. This contract exceeded the Uniform Guidance micro purchase threshold of $10,000, but did not exceed the Simplified Acquisition Threshold of $250,000. The purchase was procured through a cooperative purchasing group (COSTARS). The School District was unable to provide documentation to verify that price or rate quotations were obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. CRITERIA: Section 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2)(i) of the Uniform Guidance prescribes the bidding requirements for equipment, supplies, and work of any nature made by a non-federal entity whereby the cost exceeds certain dollar thresholds as adjusted periodically. In instances where the cost incurred exceeds the Uniform Guidance micro purchase threshold of $10,000 but does not exceed the Simplified Acquisition Threshold of $250,000, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. In addition, as specified in 2 CFR 200. 318(i) of the Uniform Guidance, the School District must maintain sufficient records to detail the history of procurement. CAUSE: School District personnel directly responsible for the oversight and execution of this procurement were not aware that procurement through the cooperative purchasing group (COSTARS) did not fully meet he procurement requirements as prescribed by Sections 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2)(i) and 2 CFR 200.318(i) of the Uniform Guidance. EFFECT: The Leechburg Area School District did not comply with the requirements of Sections 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2)(i) and 2 CFR 200.318(i) of the Uniform Guidance with regard to maintaining sufficient records to detail the history of procurement and conducting a cost or price analysis from an adequate number of qualified sources for a procurement in instances where the procurement cost incurred for goods and/or services exceeds the Uniform Guidance micro purchase threshold of $10,000 but does not exceed the Simplified Acquisition Threshold of $250,000. QUESTIONED COST: $40,150 RECOMMENDATION: I am recommending that School District management review and update annually as necessary, School District federal financial policies and procedures to ensure In instances where the procurement cost incurred for goods and/or services exceeds the Uniform Guidance micro purchase threshold of $10,000 but does not exceed the Simplified Acquisition Threshold of $250,000, that 1) price or rate quotations are obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources, and 2) sufficient records are maintained to detail the history of procurement. These measures will enable the School District to comply with the procurement requirements as prescribed Sections 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2)(i) and 2 CFR 200.318(i) of the Uniform Guidance. VIEWS OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS: The School District concurs with the above noted finding and addresses this issue in the ‘Corrective Action Plan’ included within this report.
CONDITION: The Leechburg Area School District contracted with TriMark for the purchase and installation of a dishwasher. This contract exceeded the Uniform Guidance micro purchase threshold of $10,000, but did not exceed the Simplified Acquisition Threshold of $250,000. The purchase was procured through a cooperative purchasing group (COSTARS). The School District was unable to provide documentation to verify that price or rate quotations were obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. CRITERIA: Section 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2)(i) of the Uniform Guidance prescribes the bidding requirements for equipment, supplies, and work of any nature made by a non-federal entity whereby the cost exceeds certain dollar thresholds as adjusted periodically. In instances where the cost incurred exceeds the Uniform Guidance micro purchase threshold of $10,000 but does not exceed the Simplified Acquisition Threshold of $250,000, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. In addition, as specified in 2 CFR 200. 318(i) of the Uniform Guidance, the School District must maintain sufficient records to detail the history of procurement. CAUSE: School District personnel directly responsible for the oversight and execution of this procurement were not aware that procurement through the cooperative purchasing group (COSTARS) did not fully meet he procurement requirements as prescribed by Sections 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2)(i) and 2 CFR 200.318(i) of the Uniform Guidance. EFFECT: The Leechburg Area School District did not comply with the requirements of Sections 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2)(i) and 2 CFR 200.318(i) of the Uniform Guidance with regard to maintaining sufficient records to detail the history of procurement and conducting a cost or price analysis from an adequate number of qualified sources for a procurement in instances where the procurement cost incurred for goods and/or services exceeds the Uniform Guidance micro purchase threshold of $10,000 but does not exceed the Simplified Acquisition Threshold of $250,000. QUESTIONED COST: $40,150 RECOMMENDATION: I am recommending that School District management review and update annually as necessary, School District federal financial policies and procedures to ensure In instances where the procurement cost incurred for goods and/or services exceeds the Uniform Guidance micro purchase threshold of $10,000 but does not exceed the Simplified Acquisition Threshold of $250,000, that 1) price or rate quotations are obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources, and 2) sufficient records are maintained to detail the history of procurement. These measures will enable the School District to comply with the procurement requirements as prescribed Sections 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2)(i) and 2 CFR 200.318(i) of the Uniform Guidance. VIEWS OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS: The School District concurs with the above noted finding and addresses this issue in the ‘Corrective Action Plan’ included within this report.
CONDITION: The Leechburg Area School District contracted with TriMark for the purchase and installation of a dishwasher. This contract exceeded the Uniform Guidance micro purchase threshold of $10,000, but did not exceed the Simplified Acquisition Threshold of $250,000. The purchase was procured through a cooperative purchasing group (COSTARS). The School District was unable to provide documentation to verify that price or rate quotations were obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. CRITERIA: Section 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2)(i) of the Uniform Guidance prescribes the bidding requirements for equipment, supplies, and work of any nature made by a non-federal entity whereby the cost exceeds certain dollar thresholds as adjusted periodically. In instances where the cost incurred exceeds the Uniform Guidance micro purchase threshold of $10,000 but does not exceed the Simplified Acquisition Threshold of $250,000, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. In addition, as specified in 2 CFR 200. 318(i) of the Uniform Guidance, the School District must maintain sufficient records to detail the history of procurement. CAUSE: School District personnel directly responsible for the oversight and execution of this procurement were not aware that procurement through the cooperative purchasing group (COSTARS) did not fully meet he procurement requirements as prescribed by Sections 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2)(i) and 2 CFR 200.318(i) of the Uniform Guidance. EFFECT: The Leechburg Area School District did not comply with the requirements of Sections 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2)(i) and 2 CFR 200.318(i) of the Uniform Guidance with regard to maintaining sufficient records to detail the history of procurement and conducting a cost or price analysis from an adequate number of qualified sources for a procurement in instances where the procurement cost incurred for goods and/or services exceeds the Uniform Guidance micro purchase threshold of $10,000 but does not exceed the Simplified Acquisition Threshold of $250,000. QUESTIONED COST: $40,150 RECOMMENDATION: I am recommending that School District management review and update annually as necessary, School District federal financial policies and procedures to ensure In instances where the procurement cost incurred for goods and/or services exceeds the Uniform Guidance micro purchase threshold of $10,000 but does not exceed the Simplified Acquisition Threshold of $250,000, that 1) price or rate quotations are obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources, and 2) sufficient records are maintained to detail the history of procurement. These measures will enable the School District to comply with the procurement requirements as prescribed Sections 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2)(i) and 2 CFR 200.318(i) of the Uniform Guidance. VIEWS OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS: The School District concurs with the above noted finding and addresses this issue in the ‘Corrective Action Plan’ included within this report.
CONDITION: The Leechburg Area School District contracted with TriMark for the purchase and installation of a dishwasher. This contract exceeded the Uniform Guidance micro purchase threshold of $10,000, but did not exceed the Simplified Acquisition Threshold of $250,000. The purchase was procured through a cooperative purchasing group (COSTARS). The School District was unable to provide documentation to verify that price or rate quotations were obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. CRITERIA: Section 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2)(i) of the Uniform Guidance prescribes the bidding requirements for equipment, supplies, and work of any nature made by a non-federal entity whereby the cost exceeds certain dollar thresholds as adjusted periodically. In instances where the cost incurred exceeds the Uniform Guidance micro purchase threshold of $10,000 but does not exceed the Simplified Acquisition Threshold of $250,000, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. In addition, as specified in 2 CFR 200. 318(i) of the Uniform Guidance, the School District must maintain sufficient records to detail the history of procurement. CAUSE: School District personnel directly responsible for the oversight and execution of this procurement were not aware that procurement through the cooperative purchasing group (COSTARS) did not fully meet he procurement requirements as prescribed by Sections 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2)(i) and 2 CFR 200.318(i) of the Uniform Guidance. EFFECT: The Leechburg Area School District did not comply with the requirements of Sections 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2)(i) and 2 CFR 200.318(i) of the Uniform Guidance with regard to maintaining sufficient records to detail the history of procurement and conducting a cost or price analysis from an adequate number of qualified sources for a procurement in instances where the procurement cost incurred for goods and/or services exceeds the Uniform Guidance micro purchase threshold of $10,000 but does not exceed the Simplified Acquisition Threshold of $250,000. QUESTIONED COST: $40,150 RECOMMENDATION: I am recommending that School District management review and update annually as necessary, School District federal financial policies and procedures to ensure In instances where the procurement cost incurred for goods and/or services exceeds the Uniform Guidance micro purchase threshold of $10,000 but does not exceed the Simplified Acquisition Threshold of $250,000, that 1) price or rate quotations are obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources, and 2) sufficient records are maintained to detail the history of procurement. These measures will enable the School District to comply with the procurement requirements as prescribed Sections 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2)(i) and 2 CFR 200.318(i) of the Uniform Guidance. VIEWS OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS: The School District concurs with the above noted finding and addresses this issue in the ‘Corrective Action Plan’ included within this report.
CONDITION: The Leechburg Area School District contracted with TriMark for the purchase and installation of a dishwasher. This contract exceeded the Uniform Guidance micro purchase threshold of $10,000, but did not exceed the Simplified Acquisition Threshold of $250,000. The purchase was procured through a cooperative purchasing group (COSTARS). The School District was unable to provide documentation to verify that price or rate quotations were obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. CRITERIA: Section 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2)(i) of the Uniform Guidance prescribes the bidding requirements for equipment, supplies, and work of any nature made by a non-federal entity whereby the cost exceeds certain dollar thresholds as adjusted periodically. In instances where the cost incurred exceeds the Uniform Guidance micro purchase threshold of $10,000 but does not exceed the Simplified Acquisition Threshold of $250,000, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. In addition, as specified in 2 CFR 200. 318(i) of the Uniform Guidance, the School District must maintain sufficient records to detail the history of procurement. CAUSE: School District personnel directly responsible for the oversight and execution of this procurement were not aware that procurement through the cooperative purchasing group (COSTARS) did not fully meet he procurement requirements as prescribed by Sections 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2)(i) and 2 CFR 200.318(i) of the Uniform Guidance. EFFECT: The Leechburg Area School District did not comply with the requirements of Sections 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2)(i) and 2 CFR 200.318(i) of the Uniform Guidance with regard to maintaining sufficient records to detail the history of procurement and conducting a cost or price analysis from an adequate number of qualified sources for a procurement in instances where the procurement cost incurred for goods and/or services exceeds the Uniform Guidance micro purchase threshold of $10,000 but does not exceed the Simplified Acquisition Threshold of $250,000. QUESTIONED COST: $40,150 RECOMMENDATION: I am recommending that School District management review and update annually as necessary, School District federal financial policies and procedures to ensure In instances where the procurement cost incurred for goods and/or services exceeds the Uniform Guidance micro purchase threshold of $10,000 but does not exceed the Simplified Acquisition Threshold of $250,000, that 1) price or rate quotations are obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources, and 2) sufficient records are maintained to detail the history of procurement. These measures will enable the School District to comply with the procurement requirements as prescribed Sections 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2)(i) and 2 CFR 200.318(i) of the Uniform Guidance. VIEWS OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS: The School District concurs with the above noted finding and addresses this issue in the ‘Corrective Action Plan’ included within this report.
FINDING 2024-002 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): SY2022-2023, SY2023-2024 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2022-001. Condition and Context The School Corporation had not properly designed or implemented a system of internal controls, which would include appropriate segregation of duties, that would likely be effective in preventing, or detecting and correcting, noncompliance related to the purchase of goods and services that fell within the small purchase threshold or were considered covered transactions. Procurement - Small Purchases When the value of goods or services exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold, the proper purchasing method would be the bidding process, unless the purchase meets certain other qualifications. Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for goods or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is customarily set at $250,000. However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold of $150,000 or less when small purchase procedures may be used. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds: micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. If it is determined a single source provider can be used for a small purchase, documentation must be retained supporting the determination. The School Corporation had not designed or implemented internal controls, which would consist of policies and procedures, to ensure that proper procurement procedures for small purchases were followed. A population of two small purchase vendors for fiscal year ending June 30, 2023; and a population of three small purchase venders for fiscal year ending June 30, 2024, were identified. All five were selected for testing. For three of the five small purchase transactions, totaling $102,026, the School Corporation did not obtain price or rate quotes nor was there documentation detailing the history of procurement, which must include the reason for the procurement method used. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 16 METROPOLITAN SCHOOL DISTRICT OF BOONE TOWNSHIP SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with federal award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the SAM exclusions, collecting a certification from that vendor, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that vendor. The School Corporation had not designed or implemented internal controls, which would consist of policies and procedures, to ensure that vendors were not suspended or debarred prior to entering into a covered transaction. The School Corporation had three covered transactions that equaled or exceeded $25,000 during the audit period that were identified and selected for testing. Payments to the vendors, totaling $194,537, were made without verifying if the vendors were suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from participation in federal awards. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(a) states: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non- Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327." 2 CFR 200.318(i) states: "The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price." Indiana Code 5-22-8-3(d) states: "If the purchasing agent receives a satisfactory quote, the purchasing agent shall award a contract to the lowest responsible and responsive offeror for each line or class of supplies required." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 17 METROPOLITAN SCHOOL DISTRICT OF BOONE TOWNSHIP SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases — (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the SAM.gov Exclusions, or (b) Collecting a certification from that person, or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed and implemented by management of the School Corporation, which would include segregation of key functions. The School Corporation did not adequately perform suspension and debarment procedures and were not aware of small purchase requirements. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, price or rate quotes were not obtained for small purchases and vendors to whom payments equal to or in excess of $25,000 were not verified to be not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the School Corporation. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 18 METROPOLITAN SCHOOL DISTRICT OF BOONE TOWNSHIP SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure rate or price quotes are obtained for small purchases and ensure contractors and subrecipients, as appropriate, are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded prior to entering into any contracts or subawards. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-002 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): SY2022-2023, SY2023-2024 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2022-001. Condition and Context The School Corporation had not properly designed or implemented a system of internal controls, which would include appropriate segregation of duties, that would likely be effective in preventing, or detecting and correcting, noncompliance related to the purchase of goods and services that fell within the small purchase threshold or were considered covered transactions. Procurement - Small Purchases When the value of goods or services exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold, the proper purchasing method would be the bidding process, unless the purchase meets certain other qualifications. Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for goods or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is customarily set at $250,000. However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold of $150,000 or less when small purchase procedures may be used. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds: micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. If it is determined a single source provider can be used for a small purchase, documentation must be retained supporting the determination. The School Corporation had not designed or implemented internal controls, which would consist of policies and procedures, to ensure that proper procurement procedures for small purchases were followed. A population of two small purchase vendors for fiscal year ending June 30, 2023; and a population of three small purchase venders for fiscal year ending June 30, 2024, were identified. All five were selected for testing. For three of the five small purchase transactions, totaling $102,026, the School Corporation did not obtain price or rate quotes nor was there documentation detailing the history of procurement, which must include the reason for the procurement method used. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 16 METROPOLITAN SCHOOL DISTRICT OF BOONE TOWNSHIP SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with federal award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the SAM exclusions, collecting a certification from that vendor, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that vendor. The School Corporation had not designed or implemented internal controls, which would consist of policies and procedures, to ensure that vendors were not suspended or debarred prior to entering into a covered transaction. The School Corporation had three covered transactions that equaled or exceeded $25,000 during the audit period that were identified and selected for testing. Payments to the vendors, totaling $194,537, were made without verifying if the vendors were suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from participation in federal awards. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(a) states: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non- Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327." 2 CFR 200.318(i) states: "The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price." Indiana Code 5-22-8-3(d) states: "If the purchasing agent receives a satisfactory quote, the purchasing agent shall award a contract to the lowest responsible and responsive offeror for each line or class of supplies required." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 17 METROPOLITAN SCHOOL DISTRICT OF BOONE TOWNSHIP SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases — (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the SAM.gov Exclusions, or (b) Collecting a certification from that person, or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed and implemented by management of the School Corporation, which would include segregation of key functions. The School Corporation did not adequately perform suspension and debarment procedures and were not aware of small purchase requirements. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, price or rate quotes were not obtained for small purchases and vendors to whom payments equal to or in excess of $25,000 were not verified to be not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the School Corporation. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 18 METROPOLITAN SCHOOL DISTRICT OF BOONE TOWNSHIP SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure rate or price quotes are obtained for small purchases and ensure contractors and subrecipients, as appropriate, are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded prior to entering into any contracts or subawards. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-002 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): SY2022-2023, SY2023-2024 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2022-001. Condition and Context The School Corporation had not properly designed or implemented a system of internal controls, which would include appropriate segregation of duties, that would likely be effective in preventing, or detecting and correcting, noncompliance related to the purchase of goods and services that fell within the small purchase threshold or were considered covered transactions. Procurement - Small Purchases When the value of goods or services exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold, the proper purchasing method would be the bidding process, unless the purchase meets certain other qualifications. Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for goods or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is customarily set at $250,000. However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold of $150,000 or less when small purchase procedures may be used. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds: micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. If it is determined a single source provider can be used for a small purchase, documentation must be retained supporting the determination. The School Corporation had not designed or implemented internal controls, which would consist of policies and procedures, to ensure that proper procurement procedures for small purchases were followed. A population of two small purchase vendors for fiscal year ending June 30, 2023; and a population of three small purchase venders for fiscal year ending June 30, 2024, were identified. All five were selected for testing. For three of the five small purchase transactions, totaling $102,026, the School Corporation did not obtain price or rate quotes nor was there documentation detailing the history of procurement, which must include the reason for the procurement method used. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 16 METROPOLITAN SCHOOL DISTRICT OF BOONE TOWNSHIP SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with federal award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the SAM exclusions, collecting a certification from that vendor, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that vendor. The School Corporation had not designed or implemented internal controls, which would consist of policies and procedures, to ensure that vendors were not suspended or debarred prior to entering into a covered transaction. The School Corporation had three covered transactions that equaled or exceeded $25,000 during the audit period that were identified and selected for testing. Payments to the vendors, totaling $194,537, were made without verifying if the vendors were suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from participation in federal awards. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(a) states: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non- Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327." 2 CFR 200.318(i) states: "The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price." Indiana Code 5-22-8-3(d) states: "If the purchasing agent receives a satisfactory quote, the purchasing agent shall award a contract to the lowest responsible and responsive offeror for each line or class of supplies required." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 17 METROPOLITAN SCHOOL DISTRICT OF BOONE TOWNSHIP SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases — (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the SAM.gov Exclusions, or (b) Collecting a certification from that person, or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed and implemented by management of the School Corporation, which would include segregation of key functions. The School Corporation did not adequately perform suspension and debarment procedures and were not aware of small purchase requirements. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, price or rate quotes were not obtained for small purchases and vendors to whom payments equal to or in excess of $25,000 were not verified to be not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the School Corporation. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 18 METROPOLITAN SCHOOL DISTRICT OF BOONE TOWNSHIP SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure rate or price quotes are obtained for small purchases and ensure contractors and subrecipients, as appropriate, are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded prior to entering into any contracts or subawards. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-002 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): SY2022-2023, SY2023-2024 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2022-001. Condition and Context The School Corporation had not properly designed or implemented a system of internal controls, which would include appropriate segregation of duties, that would likely be effective in preventing, or detecting and correcting, noncompliance related to the purchase of goods and services that fell within the small purchase threshold or were considered covered transactions. Procurement - Small Purchases When the value of goods or services exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold, the proper purchasing method would be the bidding process, unless the purchase meets certain other qualifications. Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for goods or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is customarily set at $250,000. However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold of $150,000 or less when small purchase procedures may be used. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds: micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. If it is determined a single source provider can be used for a small purchase, documentation must be retained supporting the determination. The School Corporation had not designed or implemented internal controls, which would consist of policies and procedures, to ensure that proper procurement procedures for small purchases were followed. A population of two small purchase vendors for fiscal year ending June 30, 2023; and a population of three small purchase venders for fiscal year ending June 30, 2024, were identified. All five were selected for testing. For three of the five small purchase transactions, totaling $102,026, the School Corporation did not obtain price or rate quotes nor was there documentation detailing the history of procurement, which must include the reason for the procurement method used. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 16 METROPOLITAN SCHOOL DISTRICT OF BOONE TOWNSHIP SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with federal award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the SAM exclusions, collecting a certification from that vendor, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that vendor. The School Corporation had not designed or implemented internal controls, which would consist of policies and procedures, to ensure that vendors were not suspended or debarred prior to entering into a covered transaction. The School Corporation had three covered transactions that equaled or exceeded $25,000 during the audit period that were identified and selected for testing. Payments to the vendors, totaling $194,537, were made without verifying if the vendors were suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from participation in federal awards. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(a) states: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non- Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327." 2 CFR 200.318(i) states: "The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price." Indiana Code 5-22-8-3(d) states: "If the purchasing agent receives a satisfactory quote, the purchasing agent shall award a contract to the lowest responsible and responsive offeror for each line or class of supplies required." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 17 METROPOLITAN SCHOOL DISTRICT OF BOONE TOWNSHIP SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases — (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the SAM.gov Exclusions, or (b) Collecting a certification from that person, or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed and implemented by management of the School Corporation, which would include segregation of key functions. The School Corporation did not adequately perform suspension and debarment procedures and were not aware of small purchase requirements. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, price or rate quotes were not obtained for small purchases and vendors to whom payments equal to or in excess of $25,000 were not verified to be not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the School Corporation. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 18 METROPOLITAN SCHOOL DISTRICT OF BOONE TOWNSHIP SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure rate or price quotes are obtained for small purchases and ensure contractors and subrecipients, as appropriate, are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded prior to entering into any contracts or subawards. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
2024-005 (2022-005) Procurement, Small Purchase (Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls over Compliance with Questioned Costs Greater than $25,000) - Repeated Title: Research and Development Cluster Funding Agency: National Science Foundation Federal Award Agreement Number: 1914463, 1953487 Award Year: 2024 Assistance Listing Number: 47.076 Title: Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention Funding Agency: United States Department of Agriculture Federal Award Agreement Number:21-DG-11030000-020, 22-DG-11030000-013 Award Year:2024 Assistance Listing Number:10.694 Condition: During our review of procurement testing in the Research and Development Cluster, the University did not follow small purchase procedures and did not have an annual self-certification election to follow micropurchase procurement for professional services. In our procurement testing in the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention grant, no support was provided to test the procurement methods used for small purchases. Progress on resolution of prior year finding: No progress was made. Questioned Costs: Known and likely questioned costs of $78,063 and $30,975 in the R&D Cluster and the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention program, respectively. Criteria: Per Title 2 US Code of Federal Regulations Part 200.303a, the non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). 2 CFR 200.320(a) sets the micro-purchase threshold at $10,000 and requires purchases over the micro-purchase threshold to use small purchase procedures, whereby price or rate quotations must be obtained and 2 CFR 200.320(a)(1)(iv) states the recipient may self-certify a threshold up to $50,000 on an annual basis and must maintain documentation to be made available to the auditors which includes a justification, clear identification of the threshold, and supporting documentation. Per Title 2 US Code of Federal Regulations Part 200.403(g), costs must be adequately documented to be allowable under Federal awards. Cause: The University was using a $50,000 threshold for professional services to utilize micropurchase method of procurement in the Research and Development Cluster. In the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention grant, the University was not retaining the supporting documentation to ensure purchase is allowable. Effect: The University may unintentionally use a higher-cost vendor when failing to obtain price or rate quotations for items over the micro-purchase threshold. In addition, the University may unintentionally charge expenses to the program that do not qualify and in turn lead to questioned costs and/or repayment of funds to the Grantor agency
2024-005 (2022-005) Procurement, Small Purchase (Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls over Compliance with Questioned Costs Greater than $25,000) - Repeated Title: Research and Development Cluster Funding Agency: National Science Foundation Federal Award Agreement Number: 1914463, 1953487 Award Year: 2024 Assistance Listing Number: 47.076 Title: Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention Funding Agency: United States Department of Agriculture Federal Award Agreement Number:21-DG-11030000-020, 22-DG-11030000-013 Award Year:2024 Assistance Listing Number:10.694 Condition: During our review of procurement testing in the Research and Development Cluster, the University did not follow small purchase procedures and did not have an annual self-certification election to follow micropurchase procurement for professional services. In our procurement testing in the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention grant, no support was provided to test the procurement methods used for small purchases. Progress on resolution of prior year finding: No progress was made. Questioned Costs: Known and likely questioned costs of $78,063 and $30,975 in the R&D Cluster and the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention program, respectively. Criteria: Per Title 2 US Code of Federal Regulations Part 200.303a, the non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). 2 CFR 200.320(a) sets the micro-purchase threshold at $10,000 and requires purchases over the micro-purchase threshold to use small purchase procedures, whereby price or rate quotations must be obtained and 2 CFR 200.320(a)(1)(iv) states the recipient may self-certify a threshold up to $50,000 on an annual basis and must maintain documentation to be made available to the auditors which includes a justification, clear identification of the threshold, and supporting documentation. Per Title 2 US Code of Federal Regulations Part 200.403(g), costs must be adequately documented to be allowable under Federal awards. Cause: The University was using a $50,000 threshold for professional services to utilize micropurchase method of procurement in the Research and Development Cluster. In the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention grant, the University was not retaining the supporting documentation to ensure purchase is allowable. Effect: The University may unintentionally use a higher-cost vendor when failing to obtain price or rate quotations for items over the micro-purchase threshold. In addition, the University may unintentionally charge expenses to the program that do not qualify and in turn lead to questioned costs and/or repayment of funds to the Grantor agency
2024-005 (2022-005) Procurement, Small Purchase (Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls over Compliance with Questioned Costs Greater than $25,000) - Repeated Title: Research and Development Cluster Funding Agency: National Science Foundation Federal Award Agreement Number: 1914463, 1953487 Award Year: 2024 Assistance Listing Number: 47.076 Title: Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention Funding Agency: United States Department of Agriculture Federal Award Agreement Number:21-DG-11030000-020, 22-DG-11030000-013 Award Year:2024 Assistance Listing Number:10.694 Condition: During our review of procurement testing in the Research and Development Cluster, the University did not follow small purchase procedures and did not have an annual self-certification election to follow micropurchase procurement for professional services. In our procurement testing in the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention grant, no support was provided to test the procurement methods used for small purchases. Progress on resolution of prior year finding: No progress was made. Questioned Costs: Known and likely questioned costs of $78,063 and $30,975 in the R&D Cluster and the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention program, respectively. Criteria: Per Title 2 US Code of Federal Regulations Part 200.303a, the non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). 2 CFR 200.320(a) sets the micro-purchase threshold at $10,000 and requires purchases over the micro-purchase threshold to use small purchase procedures, whereby price or rate quotations must be obtained and 2 CFR 200.320(a)(1)(iv) states the recipient may self-certify a threshold up to $50,000 on an annual basis and must maintain documentation to be made available to the auditors which includes a justification, clear identification of the threshold, and supporting documentation. Per Title 2 US Code of Federal Regulations Part 200.403(g), costs must be adequately documented to be allowable under Federal awards. Cause: The University was using a $50,000 threshold for professional services to utilize micropurchase method of procurement in the Research and Development Cluster. In the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention grant, the University was not retaining the supporting documentation to ensure purchase is allowable. Effect: The University may unintentionally use a higher-cost vendor when failing to obtain price or rate quotations for items over the micro-purchase threshold. In addition, the University may unintentionally charge expenses to the program that do not qualify and in turn lead to questioned costs and/or repayment of funds to the Grantor agency
2024-005 (2022-005) Procurement, Small Purchase (Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls over Compliance with Questioned Costs Greater than $25,000) - Repeated Title: Research and Development Cluster Funding Agency: National Science Foundation Federal Award Agreement Number: 1914463, 1953487 Award Year: 2024 Assistance Listing Number: 47.076 Title: Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention Funding Agency: United States Department of Agriculture Federal Award Agreement Number:21-DG-11030000-020, 22-DG-11030000-013 Award Year:2024 Assistance Listing Number:10.694 Condition: During our review of procurement testing in the Research and Development Cluster, the University did not follow small purchase procedures and did not have an annual self-certification election to follow micropurchase procurement for professional services. In our procurement testing in the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention grant, no support was provided to test the procurement methods used for small purchases. Progress on resolution of prior year finding: No progress was made. Questioned Costs: Known and likely questioned costs of $78,063 and $30,975 in the R&D Cluster and the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention program, respectively. Criteria: Per Title 2 US Code of Federal Regulations Part 200.303a, the non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). 2 CFR 200.320(a) sets the micro-purchase threshold at $10,000 and requires purchases over the micro-purchase threshold to use small purchase procedures, whereby price or rate quotations must be obtained and 2 CFR 200.320(a)(1)(iv) states the recipient may self-certify a threshold up to $50,000 on an annual basis and must maintain documentation to be made available to the auditors which includes a justification, clear identification of the threshold, and supporting documentation. Per Title 2 US Code of Federal Regulations Part 200.403(g), costs must be adequately documented to be allowable under Federal awards. Cause: The University was using a $50,000 threshold for professional services to utilize micropurchase method of procurement in the Research and Development Cluster. In the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention grant, the University was not retaining the supporting documentation to ensure purchase is allowable. Effect: The University may unintentionally use a higher-cost vendor when failing to obtain price or rate quotations for items over the micro-purchase threshold. In addition, the University may unintentionally charge expenses to the program that do not qualify and in turn lead to questioned costs and/or repayment of funds to the Grantor agency
2024-005 (2022-005) Procurement, Small Purchase (Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls over Compliance with Questioned Costs Greater than $25,000) - Repeated Title: Research and Development Cluster Funding Agency: National Science Foundation Federal Award Agreement Number: 1914463, 1953487 Award Year: 2024 Assistance Listing Number: 47.076 Title: Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention Funding Agency: United States Department of Agriculture Federal Award Agreement Number:21-DG-11030000-020, 22-DG-11030000-013 Award Year:2024 Assistance Listing Number:10.694 Condition: During our review of procurement testing in the Research and Development Cluster, the University did not follow small purchase procedures and did not have an annual self-certification election to follow micropurchase procurement for professional services. In our procurement testing in the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention grant, no support was provided to test the procurement methods used for small purchases. Progress on resolution of prior year finding: No progress was made. Questioned Costs: Known and likely questioned costs of $78,063 and $30,975 in the R&D Cluster and the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention program, respectively. Criteria: Per Title 2 US Code of Federal Regulations Part 200.303a, the non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). 2 CFR 200.320(a) sets the micro-purchase threshold at $10,000 and requires purchases over the micro-purchase threshold to use small purchase procedures, whereby price or rate quotations must be obtained and 2 CFR 200.320(a)(1)(iv) states the recipient may self-certify a threshold up to $50,000 on an annual basis and must maintain documentation to be made available to the auditors which includes a justification, clear identification of the threshold, and supporting documentation. Per Title 2 US Code of Federal Regulations Part 200.403(g), costs must be adequately documented to be allowable under Federal awards. Cause: The University was using a $50,000 threshold for professional services to utilize micropurchase method of procurement in the Research and Development Cluster. In the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention grant, the University was not retaining the supporting documentation to ensure purchase is allowable. Effect: The University may unintentionally use a higher-cost vendor when failing to obtain price or rate quotations for items over the micro-purchase threshold. In addition, the University may unintentionally charge expenses to the program that do not qualify and in turn lead to questioned costs and/or repayment of funds to the Grantor agency
2024-005 (2022-005) Procurement, Small Purchase (Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls over Compliance with Questioned Costs Greater than $25,000) - Repeated Title: Research and Development Cluster Funding Agency: National Science Foundation Federal Award Agreement Number: 1914463, 1953487 Award Year: 2024 Assistance Listing Number: 47.076 Title: Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention Funding Agency: United States Department of Agriculture Federal Award Agreement Number:21-DG-11030000-020, 22-DG-11030000-013 Award Year:2024 Assistance Listing Number:10.694 Condition: During our review of procurement testing in the Research and Development Cluster, the University did not follow small purchase procedures and did not have an annual self-certification election to follow micropurchase procurement for professional services. In our procurement testing in the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention grant, no support was provided to test the procurement methods used for small purchases. Progress on resolution of prior year finding: No progress was made. Questioned Costs: Known and likely questioned costs of $78,063 and $30,975 in the R&D Cluster and the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention program, respectively. Criteria: Per Title 2 US Code of Federal Regulations Part 200.303a, the non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). 2 CFR 200.320(a) sets the micro-purchase threshold at $10,000 and requires purchases over the micro-purchase threshold to use small purchase procedures, whereby price or rate quotations must be obtained and 2 CFR 200.320(a)(1)(iv) states the recipient may self-certify a threshold up to $50,000 on an annual basis and must maintain documentation to be made available to the auditors which includes a justification, clear identification of the threshold, and supporting documentation. Per Title 2 US Code of Federal Regulations Part 200.403(g), costs must be adequately documented to be allowable under Federal awards. Cause: The University was using a $50,000 threshold for professional services to utilize micropurchase method of procurement in the Research and Development Cluster. In the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention grant, the University was not retaining the supporting documentation to ensure purchase is allowable. Effect: The University may unintentionally use a higher-cost vendor when failing to obtain price or rate quotations for items over the micro-purchase threshold. In addition, the University may unintentionally charge expenses to the program that do not qualify and in turn lead to questioned costs and/or repayment of funds to the Grantor agency
2024-005 (2022-005) Procurement, Small Purchase (Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls over Compliance with Questioned Costs Greater than $25,000) - Repeated Title: Research and Development Cluster Funding Agency: National Science Foundation Federal Award Agreement Number: 1914463, 1953487 Award Year: 2024 Assistance Listing Number: 47.076 Title: Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention Funding Agency: United States Department of Agriculture Federal Award Agreement Number:21-DG-11030000-020, 22-DG-11030000-013 Award Year:2024 Assistance Listing Number:10.694 Condition: During our review of procurement testing in the Research and Development Cluster, the University did not follow small purchase procedures and did not have an annual self-certification election to follow micropurchase procurement for professional services. In our procurement testing in the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention grant, no support was provided to test the procurement methods used for small purchases. Progress on resolution of prior year finding: No progress was made. Questioned Costs: Known and likely questioned costs of $78,063 and $30,975 in the R&D Cluster and the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention program, respectively. Criteria: Per Title 2 US Code of Federal Regulations Part 200.303a, the non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). 2 CFR 200.320(a) sets the micro-purchase threshold at $10,000 and requires purchases over the micro-purchase threshold to use small purchase procedures, whereby price or rate quotations must be obtained and 2 CFR 200.320(a)(1)(iv) states the recipient may self-certify a threshold up to $50,000 on an annual basis and must maintain documentation to be made available to the auditors which includes a justification, clear identification of the threshold, and supporting documentation. Per Title 2 US Code of Federal Regulations Part 200.403(g), costs must be adequately documented to be allowable under Federal awards. Cause: The University was using a $50,000 threshold for professional services to utilize micropurchase method of procurement in the Research and Development Cluster. In the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention grant, the University was not retaining the supporting documentation to ensure purchase is allowable. Effect: The University may unintentionally use a higher-cost vendor when failing to obtain price or rate quotations for items over the micro-purchase threshold. In addition, the University may unintentionally charge expenses to the program that do not qualify and in turn lead to questioned costs and/or repayment of funds to the Grantor agency
2024-005 (2022-005) Procurement, Small Purchase (Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls over Compliance with Questioned Costs Greater than $25,000) - Repeated Title: Research and Development Cluster Funding Agency: National Science Foundation Federal Award Agreement Number: 1914463, 1953487 Award Year: 2024 Assistance Listing Number: 47.076 Title: Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention Funding Agency: United States Department of Agriculture Federal Award Agreement Number:21-DG-11030000-020, 22-DG-11030000-013 Award Year:2024 Assistance Listing Number:10.694 Condition: During our review of procurement testing in the Research and Development Cluster, the University did not follow small purchase procedures and did not have an annual self-certification election to follow micropurchase procurement for professional services. In our procurement testing in the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention grant, no support was provided to test the procurement methods used for small purchases. Progress on resolution of prior year finding: No progress was made. Questioned Costs: Known and likely questioned costs of $78,063 and $30,975 in the R&D Cluster and the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention program, respectively. Criteria: Per Title 2 US Code of Federal Regulations Part 200.303a, the non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). 2 CFR 200.320(a) sets the micro-purchase threshold at $10,000 and requires purchases over the micro-purchase threshold to use small purchase procedures, whereby price or rate quotations must be obtained and 2 CFR 200.320(a)(1)(iv) states the recipient may self-certify a threshold up to $50,000 on an annual basis and must maintain documentation to be made available to the auditors which includes a justification, clear identification of the threshold, and supporting documentation. Per Title 2 US Code of Federal Regulations Part 200.403(g), costs must be adequately documented to be allowable under Federal awards. Cause: The University was using a $50,000 threshold for professional services to utilize micropurchase method of procurement in the Research and Development Cluster. In the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention grant, the University was not retaining the supporting documentation to ensure purchase is allowable. Effect: The University may unintentionally use a higher-cost vendor when failing to obtain price or rate quotations for items over the micro-purchase threshold. In addition, the University may unintentionally charge expenses to the program that do not qualify and in turn lead to questioned costs and/or repayment of funds to the Grantor agency
2024-005 (2022-005) Procurement, Small Purchase (Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls over Compliance with Questioned Costs Greater than $25,000) - Repeated Title: Research and Development Cluster Funding Agency: National Science Foundation Federal Award Agreement Number: 1914463, 1953487 Award Year: 2024 Assistance Listing Number: 47.076 Title: Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention Funding Agency: United States Department of Agriculture Federal Award Agreement Number:21-DG-11030000-020, 22-DG-11030000-013 Award Year:2024 Assistance Listing Number:10.694 Condition: During our review of procurement testing in the Research and Development Cluster, the University did not follow small purchase procedures and did not have an annual self-certification election to follow micropurchase procurement for professional services. In our procurement testing in the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention grant, no support was provided to test the procurement methods used for small purchases. Progress on resolution of prior year finding: No progress was made. Questioned Costs: Known and likely questioned costs of $78,063 and $30,975 in the R&D Cluster and the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention program, respectively. Criteria: Per Title 2 US Code of Federal Regulations Part 200.303a, the non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). 2 CFR 200.320(a) sets the micro-purchase threshold at $10,000 and requires purchases over the micro-purchase threshold to use small purchase procedures, whereby price or rate quotations must be obtained and 2 CFR 200.320(a)(1)(iv) states the recipient may self-certify a threshold up to $50,000 on an annual basis and must maintain documentation to be made available to the auditors which includes a justification, clear identification of the threshold, and supporting documentation. Per Title 2 US Code of Federal Regulations Part 200.403(g), costs must be adequately documented to be allowable under Federal awards. Cause: The University was using a $50,000 threshold for professional services to utilize micropurchase method of procurement in the Research and Development Cluster. In the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention grant, the University was not retaining the supporting documentation to ensure purchase is allowable. Effect: The University may unintentionally use a higher-cost vendor when failing to obtain price or rate quotations for items over the micro-purchase threshold. In addition, the University may unintentionally charge expenses to the program that do not qualify and in turn lead to questioned costs and/or repayment of funds to the Grantor agency
2024-005 (2022-005) Procurement, Small Purchase (Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls over Compliance with Questioned Costs Greater than $25,000) - Repeated Title: Research and Development Cluster Funding Agency: National Science Foundation Federal Award Agreement Number: 1914463, 1953487 Award Year: 2024 Assistance Listing Number: 47.076 Title: Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention Funding Agency: United States Department of Agriculture Federal Award Agreement Number:21-DG-11030000-020, 22-DG-11030000-013 Award Year:2024 Assistance Listing Number:10.694 Condition: During our review of procurement testing in the Research and Development Cluster, the University did not follow small purchase procedures and did not have an annual self-certification election to follow micropurchase procurement for professional services. In our procurement testing in the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention grant, no support was provided to test the procurement methods used for small purchases. Progress on resolution of prior year finding: No progress was made. Questioned Costs: Known and likely questioned costs of $78,063 and $30,975 in the R&D Cluster and the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention program, respectively. Criteria: Per Title 2 US Code of Federal Regulations Part 200.303a, the non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). 2 CFR 200.320(a) sets the micro-purchase threshold at $10,000 and requires purchases over the micro-purchase threshold to use small purchase procedures, whereby price or rate quotations must be obtained and 2 CFR 200.320(a)(1)(iv) states the recipient may self-certify a threshold up to $50,000 on an annual basis and must maintain documentation to be made available to the auditors which includes a justification, clear identification of the threshold, and supporting documentation. Per Title 2 US Code of Federal Regulations Part 200.403(g), costs must be adequately documented to be allowable under Federal awards. Cause: The University was using a $50,000 threshold for professional services to utilize micropurchase method of procurement in the Research and Development Cluster. In the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention grant, the University was not retaining the supporting documentation to ensure purchase is allowable. Effect: The University may unintentionally use a higher-cost vendor when failing to obtain price or rate quotations for items over the micro-purchase threshold. In addition, the University may unintentionally charge expenses to the program that do not qualify and in turn lead to questioned costs and/or repayment of funds to the Grantor agency
2024-005 (2022-005) Procurement, Small Purchase (Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls over Compliance with Questioned Costs Greater than $25,000) - Repeated Title: Research and Development Cluster Funding Agency: National Science Foundation Federal Award Agreement Number: 1914463, 1953487 Award Year: 2024 Assistance Listing Number: 47.076 Title: Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention Funding Agency: United States Department of Agriculture Federal Award Agreement Number:21-DG-11030000-020, 22-DG-11030000-013 Award Year:2024 Assistance Listing Number:10.694 Condition: During our review of procurement testing in the Research and Development Cluster, the University did not follow small purchase procedures and did not have an annual self-certification election to follow micropurchase procurement for professional services. In our procurement testing in the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention grant, no support was provided to test the procurement methods used for small purchases. Progress on resolution of prior year finding: No progress was made. Questioned Costs: Known and likely questioned costs of $78,063 and $30,975 in the R&D Cluster and the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention program, respectively. Criteria: Per Title 2 US Code of Federal Regulations Part 200.303a, the non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). 2 CFR 200.320(a) sets the micro-purchase threshold at $10,000 and requires purchases over the micro-purchase threshold to use small purchase procedures, whereby price or rate quotations must be obtained and 2 CFR 200.320(a)(1)(iv) states the recipient may self-certify a threshold up to $50,000 on an annual basis and must maintain documentation to be made available to the auditors which includes a justification, clear identification of the threshold, and supporting documentation. Per Title 2 US Code of Federal Regulations Part 200.403(g), costs must be adequately documented to be allowable under Federal awards. Cause: The University was using a $50,000 threshold for professional services to utilize micropurchase method of procurement in the Research and Development Cluster. In the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention grant, the University was not retaining the supporting documentation to ensure purchase is allowable. Effect: The University may unintentionally use a higher-cost vendor when failing to obtain price or rate quotations for items over the micro-purchase threshold. In addition, the University may unintentionally charge expenses to the program that do not qualify and in turn lead to questioned costs and/or repayment of funds to the Grantor agency
2024-005 (2022-005) Procurement, Small Purchase (Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls over Compliance with Questioned Costs Greater than $25,000) - Repeated Title: Research and Development Cluster Funding Agency: National Science Foundation Federal Award Agreement Number: 1914463, 1953487 Award Year: 2024 Assistance Listing Number: 47.076 Title: Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention Funding Agency: United States Department of Agriculture Federal Award Agreement Number:21-DG-11030000-020, 22-DG-11030000-013 Award Year:2024 Assistance Listing Number:10.694 Condition: During our review of procurement testing in the Research and Development Cluster, the University did not follow small purchase procedures and did not have an annual self-certification election to follow micropurchase procurement for professional services. In our procurement testing in the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention grant, no support was provided to test the procurement methods used for small purchases. Progress on resolution of prior year finding: No progress was made. Questioned Costs: Known and likely questioned costs of $78,063 and $30,975 in the R&D Cluster and the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention program, respectively. Criteria: Per Title 2 US Code of Federal Regulations Part 200.303a, the non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). 2 CFR 200.320(a) sets the micro-purchase threshold at $10,000 and requires purchases over the micro-purchase threshold to use small purchase procedures, whereby price or rate quotations must be obtained and 2 CFR 200.320(a)(1)(iv) states the recipient may self-certify a threshold up to $50,000 on an annual basis and must maintain documentation to be made available to the auditors which includes a justification, clear identification of the threshold, and supporting documentation. Per Title 2 US Code of Federal Regulations Part 200.403(g), costs must be adequately documented to be allowable under Federal awards. Cause: The University was using a $50,000 threshold for professional services to utilize micropurchase method of procurement in the Research and Development Cluster. In the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention grant, the University was not retaining the supporting documentation to ensure purchase is allowable. Effect: The University may unintentionally use a higher-cost vendor when failing to obtain price or rate quotations for items over the micro-purchase threshold. In addition, the University may unintentionally charge expenses to the program that do not qualify and in turn lead to questioned costs and/or repayment of funds to the Grantor agency
2024-005 (2022-005) Procurement, Small Purchase (Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls over Compliance with Questioned Costs Greater than $25,000) - Repeated Title: Research and Development Cluster Funding Agency: National Science Foundation Federal Award Agreement Number: 1914463, 1953487 Award Year: 2024 Assistance Listing Number: 47.076 Title: Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention Funding Agency: United States Department of Agriculture Federal Award Agreement Number:21-DG-11030000-020, 22-DG-11030000-013 Award Year:2024 Assistance Listing Number:10.694 Condition: During our review of procurement testing in the Research and Development Cluster, the University did not follow small purchase procedures and did not have an annual self-certification election to follow micropurchase procurement for professional services. In our procurement testing in the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention grant, no support was provided to test the procurement methods used for small purchases. Progress on resolution of prior year finding: No progress was made. Questioned Costs: Known and likely questioned costs of $78,063 and $30,975 in the R&D Cluster and the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention program, respectively. Criteria: Per Title 2 US Code of Federal Regulations Part 200.303a, the non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). 2 CFR 200.320(a) sets the micro-purchase threshold at $10,000 and requires purchases over the micro-purchase threshold to use small purchase procedures, whereby price or rate quotations must be obtained and 2 CFR 200.320(a)(1)(iv) states the recipient may self-certify a threshold up to $50,000 on an annual basis and must maintain documentation to be made available to the auditors which includes a justification, clear identification of the threshold, and supporting documentation. Per Title 2 US Code of Federal Regulations Part 200.403(g), costs must be adequately documented to be allowable under Federal awards. Cause: The University was using a $50,000 threshold for professional services to utilize micropurchase method of procurement in the Research and Development Cluster. In the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention grant, the University was not retaining the supporting documentation to ensure purchase is allowable. Effect: The University may unintentionally use a higher-cost vendor when failing to obtain price or rate quotations for items over the micro-purchase threshold. In addition, the University may unintentionally charge expenses to the program that do not qualify and in turn lead to questioned costs and/or repayment of funds to the Grantor agency
2024-005 (2022-005) Procurement, Small Purchase (Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls over Compliance with Questioned Costs Greater than $25,000) - Repeated Title: Research and Development Cluster Funding Agency: National Science Foundation Federal Award Agreement Number: 1914463, 1953487 Award Year: 2024 Assistance Listing Number: 47.076 Title: Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention Funding Agency: United States Department of Agriculture Federal Award Agreement Number:21-DG-11030000-020, 22-DG-11030000-013 Award Year:2024 Assistance Listing Number:10.694 Condition: During our review of procurement testing in the Research and Development Cluster, the University did not follow small purchase procedures and did not have an annual self-certification election to follow micropurchase procurement for professional services. In our procurement testing in the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention grant, no support was provided to test the procurement methods used for small purchases. Progress on resolution of prior year finding: No progress was made. Questioned Costs: Known and likely questioned costs of $78,063 and $30,975 in the R&D Cluster and the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention program, respectively. Criteria: Per Title 2 US Code of Federal Regulations Part 200.303a, the non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). 2 CFR 200.320(a) sets the micro-purchase threshold at $10,000 and requires purchases over the micro-purchase threshold to use small purchase procedures, whereby price or rate quotations must be obtained and 2 CFR 200.320(a)(1)(iv) states the recipient may self-certify a threshold up to $50,000 on an annual basis and must maintain documentation to be made available to the auditors which includes a justification, clear identification of the threshold, and supporting documentation. Per Title 2 US Code of Federal Regulations Part 200.403(g), costs must be adequately documented to be allowable under Federal awards. Cause: The University was using a $50,000 threshold for professional services to utilize micropurchase method of procurement in the Research and Development Cluster. In the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention grant, the University was not retaining the supporting documentation to ensure purchase is allowable. Effect: The University may unintentionally use a higher-cost vendor when failing to obtain price or rate quotations for items over the micro-purchase threshold. In addition, the University may unintentionally charge expenses to the program that do not qualify and in turn lead to questioned costs and/or repayment of funds to the Grantor agency
2024-005 (2022-005) Procurement, Small Purchase (Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls over Compliance with Questioned Costs Greater than $25,000) - Repeated Title: Research and Development Cluster Funding Agency: National Science Foundation Federal Award Agreement Number: 1914463, 1953487 Award Year: 2024 Assistance Listing Number: 47.076 Title: Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention Funding Agency: United States Department of Agriculture Federal Award Agreement Number:21-DG-11030000-020, 22-DG-11030000-013 Award Year:2024 Assistance Listing Number:10.694 Condition: During our review of procurement testing in the Research and Development Cluster, the University did not follow small purchase procedures and did not have an annual self-certification election to follow micropurchase procurement for professional services. In our procurement testing in the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention grant, no support was provided to test the procurement methods used for small purchases. Progress on resolution of prior year finding: No progress was made. Questioned Costs: Known and likely questioned costs of $78,063 and $30,975 in the R&D Cluster and the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention program, respectively. Criteria: Per Title 2 US Code of Federal Regulations Part 200.303a, the non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). 2 CFR 200.320(a) sets the micro-purchase threshold at $10,000 and requires purchases over the micro-purchase threshold to use small purchase procedures, whereby price or rate quotations must be obtained and 2 CFR 200.320(a)(1)(iv) states the recipient may self-certify a threshold up to $50,000 on an annual basis and must maintain documentation to be made available to the auditors which includes a justification, clear identification of the threshold, and supporting documentation. Per Title 2 US Code of Federal Regulations Part 200.403(g), costs must be adequately documented to be allowable under Federal awards. Cause: The University was using a $50,000 threshold for professional services to utilize micropurchase method of procurement in the Research and Development Cluster. In the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention grant, the University was not retaining the supporting documentation to ensure purchase is allowable. Effect: The University may unintentionally use a higher-cost vendor when failing to obtain price or rate quotations for items over the micro-purchase threshold. In addition, the University may unintentionally charge expenses to the program that do not qualify and in turn lead to questioned costs and/or repayment of funds to the Grantor agency
2024-005 (2022-005) Procurement, Small Purchase (Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls over Compliance with Questioned Costs Greater than $25,000) - Repeated Title: Research and Development Cluster Funding Agency: National Science Foundation Federal Award Agreement Number: 1914463, 1953487 Award Year: 2024 Assistance Listing Number: 47.076 Title: Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention Funding Agency: United States Department of Agriculture Federal Award Agreement Number:21-DG-11030000-020, 22-DG-11030000-013 Award Year:2024 Assistance Listing Number:10.694 Condition: During our review of procurement testing in the Research and Development Cluster, the University did not follow small purchase procedures and did not have an annual self-certification election to follow micropurchase procurement for professional services. In our procurement testing in the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention grant, no support was provided to test the procurement methods used for small purchases. Progress on resolution of prior year finding: No progress was made. Questioned Costs: Known and likely questioned costs of $78,063 and $30,975 in the R&D Cluster and the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention program, respectively. Criteria: Per Title 2 US Code of Federal Regulations Part 200.303a, the non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). 2 CFR 200.320(a) sets the micro-purchase threshold at $10,000 and requires purchases over the micro-purchase threshold to use small purchase procedures, whereby price or rate quotations must be obtained and 2 CFR 200.320(a)(1)(iv) states the recipient may self-certify a threshold up to $50,000 on an annual basis and must maintain documentation to be made available to the auditors which includes a justification, clear identification of the threshold, and supporting documentation. Per Title 2 US Code of Federal Regulations Part 200.403(g), costs must be adequately documented to be allowable under Federal awards. Cause: The University was using a $50,000 threshold for professional services to utilize micropurchase method of procurement in the Research and Development Cluster. In the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention grant, the University was not retaining the supporting documentation to ensure purchase is allowable. Effect: The University may unintentionally use a higher-cost vendor when failing to obtain price or rate quotations for items over the micro-purchase threshold. In addition, the University may unintentionally charge expenses to the program that do not qualify and in turn lead to questioned costs and/or repayment of funds to the Grantor agency
2024-005 (2022-005) Procurement, Small Purchase (Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls over Compliance with Questioned Costs Greater than $25,000) - Repeated Title: Research and Development Cluster Funding Agency: National Science Foundation Federal Award Agreement Number: 1914463, 1953487 Award Year: 2024 Assistance Listing Number: 47.076 Title: Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention Funding Agency: United States Department of Agriculture Federal Award Agreement Number:21-DG-11030000-020, 22-DG-11030000-013 Award Year:2024 Assistance Listing Number:10.694 Condition: During our review of procurement testing in the Research and Development Cluster, the University did not follow small purchase procedures and did not have an annual self-certification election to follow micropurchase procurement for professional services. In our procurement testing in the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention grant, no support was provided to test the procurement methods used for small purchases. Progress on resolution of prior year finding: No progress was made. Questioned Costs: Known and likely questioned costs of $78,063 and $30,975 in the R&D Cluster and the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention program, respectively. Criteria: Per Title 2 US Code of Federal Regulations Part 200.303a, the non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). 2 CFR 200.320(a) sets the micro-purchase threshold at $10,000 and requires purchases over the micro-purchase threshold to use small purchase procedures, whereby price or rate quotations must be obtained and 2 CFR 200.320(a)(1)(iv) states the recipient may self-certify a threshold up to $50,000 on an annual basis and must maintain documentation to be made available to the auditors which includes a justification, clear identification of the threshold, and supporting documentation. Per Title 2 US Code of Federal Regulations Part 200.403(g), costs must be adequately documented to be allowable under Federal awards. Cause: The University was using a $50,000 threshold for professional services to utilize micropurchase method of procurement in the Research and Development Cluster. In the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention grant, the University was not retaining the supporting documentation to ensure purchase is allowable. Effect: The University may unintentionally use a higher-cost vendor when failing to obtain price or rate quotations for items over the micro-purchase threshold. In addition, the University may unintentionally charge expenses to the program that do not qualify and in turn lead to questioned costs and/or repayment of funds to the Grantor agency
2024-005 (2022-005) Procurement, Small Purchase (Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls over Compliance with Questioned Costs Greater than $25,000) - Repeated Title: Research and Development Cluster Funding Agency: National Science Foundation Federal Award Agreement Number: 1914463, 1953487 Award Year: 2024 Assistance Listing Number: 47.076 Title: Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention Funding Agency: United States Department of Agriculture Federal Award Agreement Number:21-DG-11030000-020, 22-DG-11030000-013 Award Year:2024 Assistance Listing Number:10.694 Condition: During our review of procurement testing in the Research and Development Cluster, the University did not follow small purchase procedures and did not have an annual self-certification election to follow micropurchase procurement for professional services. In our procurement testing in the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention grant, no support was provided to test the procurement methods used for small purchases. Progress on resolution of prior year finding: No progress was made. Questioned Costs: Known and likely questioned costs of $78,063 and $30,975 in the R&D Cluster and the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention program, respectively. Criteria: Per Title 2 US Code of Federal Regulations Part 200.303a, the non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). 2 CFR 200.320(a) sets the micro-purchase threshold at $10,000 and requires purchases over the micro-purchase threshold to use small purchase procedures, whereby price or rate quotations must be obtained and 2 CFR 200.320(a)(1)(iv) states the recipient may self-certify a threshold up to $50,000 on an annual basis and must maintain documentation to be made available to the auditors which includes a justification, clear identification of the threshold, and supporting documentation. Per Title 2 US Code of Federal Regulations Part 200.403(g), costs must be adequately documented to be allowable under Federal awards. Cause: The University was using a $50,000 threshold for professional services to utilize micropurchase method of procurement in the Research and Development Cluster. In the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention grant, the University was not retaining the supporting documentation to ensure purchase is allowable. Effect: The University may unintentionally use a higher-cost vendor when failing to obtain price or rate quotations for items over the micro-purchase threshold. In addition, the University may unintentionally charge expenses to the program that do not qualify and in turn lead to questioned costs and/or repayment of funds to the Grantor agency
2024-005 (2022-005) Procurement, Small Purchase (Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls over Compliance with Questioned Costs Greater than $25,000) - Repeated Title: Research and Development Cluster Funding Agency: National Science Foundation Federal Award Agreement Number: 1914463, 1953487 Award Year: 2024 Assistance Listing Number: 47.076 Title: Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention Funding Agency: United States Department of Agriculture Federal Award Agreement Number:21-DG-11030000-020, 22-DG-11030000-013 Award Year:2024 Assistance Listing Number:10.694 Condition: During our review of procurement testing in the Research and Development Cluster, the University did not follow small purchase procedures and did not have an annual self-certification election to follow micropurchase procurement for professional services. In our procurement testing in the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention grant, no support was provided to test the procurement methods used for small purchases. Progress on resolution of prior year finding: No progress was made. Questioned Costs: Known and likely questioned costs of $78,063 and $30,975 in the R&D Cluster and the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention program, respectively. Criteria: Per Title 2 US Code of Federal Regulations Part 200.303a, the non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). 2 CFR 200.320(a) sets the micro-purchase threshold at $10,000 and requires purchases over the micro-purchase threshold to use small purchase procedures, whereby price or rate quotations must be obtained and 2 CFR 200.320(a)(1)(iv) states the recipient may self-certify a threshold up to $50,000 on an annual basis and must maintain documentation to be made available to the auditors which includes a justification, clear identification of the threshold, and supporting documentation. Per Title 2 US Code of Federal Regulations Part 200.403(g), costs must be adequately documented to be allowable under Federal awards. Cause: The University was using a $50,000 threshold for professional services to utilize micropurchase method of procurement in the Research and Development Cluster. In the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention grant, the University was not retaining the supporting documentation to ensure purchase is allowable. Effect: The University may unintentionally use a higher-cost vendor when failing to obtain price or rate quotations for items over the micro-purchase threshold. In addition, the University may unintentionally charge expenses to the program that do not qualify and in turn lead to questioned costs and/or repayment of funds to the Grantor agency
2024-005 (2022-005) Procurement, Small Purchase (Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls over Compliance with Questioned Costs Greater than $25,000) - Repeated Title: Research and Development Cluster Funding Agency: National Science Foundation Federal Award Agreement Number: 1914463, 1953487 Award Year: 2024 Assistance Listing Number: 47.076 Title: Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention Funding Agency: United States Department of Agriculture Federal Award Agreement Number:21-DG-11030000-020, 22-DG-11030000-013 Award Year:2024 Assistance Listing Number:10.694 Condition: During our review of procurement testing in the Research and Development Cluster, the University did not follow small purchase procedures and did not have an annual self-certification election to follow micropurchase procurement for professional services. In our procurement testing in the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention grant, no support was provided to test the procurement methods used for small purchases. Progress on resolution of prior year finding: No progress was made. Questioned Costs: Known and likely questioned costs of $78,063 and $30,975 in the R&D Cluster and the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention program, respectively. Criteria: Per Title 2 US Code of Federal Regulations Part 200.303a, the non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). 2 CFR 200.320(a) sets the micro-purchase threshold at $10,000 and requires purchases over the micro-purchase threshold to use small purchase procedures, whereby price or rate quotations must be obtained and 2 CFR 200.320(a)(1)(iv) states the recipient may self-certify a threshold up to $50,000 on an annual basis and must maintain documentation to be made available to the auditors which includes a justification, clear identification of the threshold, and supporting documentation. Per Title 2 US Code of Federal Regulations Part 200.403(g), costs must be adequately documented to be allowable under Federal awards. Cause: The University was using a $50,000 threshold for professional services to utilize micropurchase method of procurement in the Research and Development Cluster. In the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention grant, the University was not retaining the supporting documentation to ensure purchase is allowable. Effect: The University may unintentionally use a higher-cost vendor when failing to obtain price or rate quotations for items over the micro-purchase threshold. In addition, the University may unintentionally charge expenses to the program that do not qualify and in turn lead to questioned costs and/or repayment of funds to the Grantor agency
2024-005 (2022-005) Procurement, Small Purchase (Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls over Compliance with Questioned Costs Greater than $25,000) - Repeated Title: Research and Development Cluster Funding Agency: National Science Foundation Federal Award Agreement Number: 1914463, 1953487 Award Year: 2024 Assistance Listing Number: 47.076 Title: Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention Funding Agency: United States Department of Agriculture Federal Award Agreement Number:21-DG-11030000-020, 22-DG-11030000-013 Award Year:2024 Assistance Listing Number:10.694 Condition: During our review of procurement testing in the Research and Development Cluster, the University did not follow small purchase procedures and did not have an annual self-certification election to follow micropurchase procurement for professional services. In our procurement testing in the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention grant, no support was provided to test the procurement methods used for small purchases. Progress on resolution of prior year finding: No progress was made. Questioned Costs: Known and likely questioned costs of $78,063 and $30,975 in the R&D Cluster and the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention program, respectively. Criteria: Per Title 2 US Code of Federal Regulations Part 200.303a, the non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). 2 CFR 200.320(a) sets the micro-purchase threshold at $10,000 and requires purchases over the micro-purchase threshold to use small purchase procedures, whereby price or rate quotations must be obtained and 2 CFR 200.320(a)(1)(iv) states the recipient may self-certify a threshold up to $50,000 on an annual basis and must maintain documentation to be made available to the auditors which includes a justification, clear identification of the threshold, and supporting documentation. Per Title 2 US Code of Federal Regulations Part 200.403(g), costs must be adequately documented to be allowable under Federal awards. Cause: The University was using a $50,000 threshold for professional services to utilize micropurchase method of procurement in the Research and Development Cluster. In the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention grant, the University was not retaining the supporting documentation to ensure purchase is allowable. Effect: The University may unintentionally use a higher-cost vendor when failing to obtain price or rate quotations for items over the micro-purchase threshold. In addition, the University may unintentionally charge expenses to the program that do not qualify and in turn lead to questioned costs and/or repayment of funds to the Grantor agency
2024-005 (2022-005) Procurement, Small Purchase (Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls over Compliance with Questioned Costs Greater than $25,000) - Repeated Title: Research and Development Cluster Funding Agency: National Science Foundation Federal Award Agreement Number: 1914463, 1953487 Award Year: 2024 Assistance Listing Number: 47.076 Title: Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention Funding Agency: United States Department of Agriculture Federal Award Agreement Number:21-DG-11030000-020, 22-DG-11030000-013 Award Year:2024 Assistance Listing Number:10.694 Condition: During our review of procurement testing in the Research and Development Cluster, the University did not follow small purchase procedures and did not have an annual self-certification election to follow micropurchase procurement for professional services. In our procurement testing in the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention grant, no support was provided to test the procurement methods used for small purchases. Progress on resolution of prior year finding: No progress was made. Questioned Costs: Known and likely questioned costs of $78,063 and $30,975 in the R&D Cluster and the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention program, respectively. Criteria: Per Title 2 US Code of Federal Regulations Part 200.303a, the non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). 2 CFR 200.320(a) sets the micro-purchase threshold at $10,000 and requires purchases over the micro-purchase threshold to use small purchase procedures, whereby price or rate quotations must be obtained and 2 CFR 200.320(a)(1)(iv) states the recipient may self-certify a threshold up to $50,000 on an annual basis and must maintain documentation to be made available to the auditors which includes a justification, clear identification of the threshold, and supporting documentation. Per Title 2 US Code of Federal Regulations Part 200.403(g), costs must be adequately documented to be allowable under Federal awards. Cause: The University was using a $50,000 threshold for professional services to utilize micropurchase method of procurement in the Research and Development Cluster. In the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention grant, the University was not retaining the supporting documentation to ensure purchase is allowable. Effect: The University may unintentionally use a higher-cost vendor when failing to obtain price or rate quotations for items over the micro-purchase threshold. In addition, the University may unintentionally charge expenses to the program that do not qualify and in turn lead to questioned costs and/or repayment of funds to the Grantor agency
2024-005 (2022-005) Procurement, Small Purchase (Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls over Compliance with Questioned Costs Greater than $25,000) - Repeated Title: Research and Development Cluster Funding Agency: National Science Foundation Federal Award Agreement Number: 1914463, 1953487 Award Year: 2024 Assistance Listing Number: 47.076 Title: Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention Funding Agency: United States Department of Agriculture Federal Award Agreement Number:21-DG-11030000-020, 22-DG-11030000-013 Award Year:2024 Assistance Listing Number:10.694 Condition: During our review of procurement testing in the Research and Development Cluster, the University did not follow small purchase procedures and did not have an annual self-certification election to follow micropurchase procurement for professional services. In our procurement testing in the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention grant, no support was provided to test the procurement methods used for small purchases. Progress on resolution of prior year finding: No progress was made. Questioned Costs: Known and likely questioned costs of $78,063 and $30,975 in the R&D Cluster and the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention program, respectively. Criteria: Per Title 2 US Code of Federal Regulations Part 200.303a, the non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). 2 CFR 200.320(a) sets the micro-purchase threshold at $10,000 and requires purchases over the micro-purchase threshold to use small purchase procedures, whereby price or rate quotations must be obtained and 2 CFR 200.320(a)(1)(iv) states the recipient may self-certify a threshold up to $50,000 on an annual basis and must maintain documentation to be made available to the auditors which includes a justification, clear identification of the threshold, and supporting documentation. Per Title 2 US Code of Federal Regulations Part 200.403(g), costs must be adequately documented to be allowable under Federal awards. Cause: The University was using a $50,000 threshold for professional services to utilize micropurchase method of procurement in the Research and Development Cluster. In the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention grant, the University was not retaining the supporting documentation to ensure purchase is allowable. Effect: The University may unintentionally use a higher-cost vendor when failing to obtain price or rate quotations for items over the micro-purchase threshold. In addition, the University may unintentionally charge expenses to the program that do not qualify and in turn lead to questioned costs and/or repayment of funds to the Grantor agency
2024-005 (2022-005) Procurement, Small Purchase (Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls over Compliance with Questioned Costs Greater than $25,000) - Repeated Title: Research and Development Cluster Funding Agency: National Science Foundation Federal Award Agreement Number: 1914463, 1953487 Award Year: 2024 Assistance Listing Number: 47.076 Title: Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention Funding Agency: United States Department of Agriculture Federal Award Agreement Number:21-DG-11030000-020, 22-DG-11030000-013 Award Year:2024 Assistance Listing Number:10.694 Condition: During our review of procurement testing in the Research and Development Cluster, the University did not follow small purchase procedures and did not have an annual self-certification election to follow micropurchase procurement for professional services. In our procurement testing in the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention grant, no support was provided to test the procurement methods used for small purchases. Progress on resolution of prior year finding: No progress was made. Questioned Costs: Known and likely questioned costs of $78,063 and $30,975 in the R&D Cluster and the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention program, respectively. Criteria: Per Title 2 US Code of Federal Regulations Part 200.303a, the non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). 2 CFR 200.320(a) sets the micro-purchase threshold at $10,000 and requires purchases over the micro-purchase threshold to use small purchase procedures, whereby price or rate quotations must be obtained and 2 CFR 200.320(a)(1)(iv) states the recipient may self-certify a threshold up to $50,000 on an annual basis and must maintain documentation to be made available to the auditors which includes a justification, clear identification of the threshold, and supporting documentation. Per Title 2 US Code of Federal Regulations Part 200.403(g), costs must be adequately documented to be allowable under Federal awards. Cause: The University was using a $50,000 threshold for professional services to utilize micropurchase method of procurement in the Research and Development Cluster. In the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention grant, the University was not retaining the supporting documentation to ensure purchase is allowable. Effect: The University may unintentionally use a higher-cost vendor when failing to obtain price or rate quotations for items over the micro-purchase threshold. In addition, the University may unintentionally charge expenses to the program that do not qualify and in turn lead to questioned costs and/or repayment of funds to the Grantor agency
Information on the federal program: Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States; Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027X; 84.173X Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 22611-042-ARP; 22619-042-ARP Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Qualified Opinion Criteria: 2 CFR 200.313(d) states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)...." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non- Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases — (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . .” (b) Formal Procurement Methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal financial assistance award exceeds the SAT, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require following documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a non-competitive procurement can be used in accordance with § 200.319 or paragraph (c) of this section. The following formal methods of procurement are used for pro procurement of property or services above the simplified acquisition threshold or a value below the simplified acquisition threshold the non-Federal entity determines to be appropriate: . . . (1) Sealed bids. A procurement method in which bids are publicly solicited and a firm fixed-price contract (lump sum or unit price) is awarded to the responsible bidder whose bid, conforming with all the material terms and conditions of the invitation for bids, is the lowest in price. The sealed bids method is the preferred method for procuring construction, if the conditions. . . .” (2) Proposals. A procurement method in which either a fixed price or cost-reimbursement type contract is awarded. Proposals are generally used when conditions are not appropriate for the use of sealed bids. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: “When you enter into a covered transaction with another person as the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person.” Condition: The School Corporation did not have internal controls in place to ensure that the Cooperative complied with the procurement and the suspension and debarment requirements. The Cooperative did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that the requirements for the simplified acquisition threshold and for small purchases were met for each applicable procured good or service or to ensure that vendors were not suspended or debarred prior to entering into a covered transaction. Cause: The Cooperative noted that ARP portion of the Special Education grant was new for the 2022-2023 and 2023-2024 school years. The ARP funding gave opportunity for types of expenditures that do not typically get expensed using Special Education funding. The transactions noted within the Condition and Context were from the ARP portion of the grant, which provided property or services that exceeded the micro-purchase threshold. Management of the Cooperative was unaware of the procurement requirements when property or services exceed the micro-purchase threshold. In addition, management of the Cooperative was unaware of the Suspension and Debarment requirements when a covered transaction is expected to equal or exceed $25,000. Effect: Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, including policies and procedures that provide segregation of duties and additional oversight as needed, the control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. Without following the required methods for procurement, the Cooperative could be overpaying for services. Unverified vendors to whom payments equal to or in excess of $25,000 could be suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the reduction of future federal funding to the Cooperative. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: The School Corporation is a member of the Northeast Indiana Special Education Cooperative (Cooperative). During fiscal years 2022-2023 and 2023-2024, the Cooperative operated the special education program and spent the federal money on behalf of all its members. As the grant agreement was between the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE) and each member school, the School Corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. When the value of the procurement for property or services exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), or a lower threshold established by a nonfederal entity, formal procurement methods are required. The SAT is typically set at $250,000. However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold. Therefore, the SAT threshold is set at $150,000. Formal procurement methods require adherence to documented procedures and formal methods such as sealed bids or proposals. When the purchase value exceeds the micro-purchase threshold but is less than the simplified acquisition threshold, a small purchase occurs. Small purchases require documented full and open competition or a documented rationale for limited competition. For fiscal year 2023, the Cooperative had one vendor, with disbursements totaling $379,313, which exceeded the SAT threshold of $150,000. The Cooperative did not obtain sealed bids or competitive proposals nor was there documentation detailing the history of the procurement, which must include the reason for the procurement method used. For fiscal year 2023, the Cooperative had one vendor with disbursements in the amount of $55,374, which were less than the SAT threshold of $150,000, but exceeded the $50,000 micro-purchase threshold and was selected for testing. The Cooperative did not obtain price or rate quotes nor was there documentation detailing the history of the procurement, which must include the reason for the procurement method used. For fiscal year 2024, three vendors with disbursements totaling $175,125, were identified as being less than the simplified acquisition threshold of $150,000, but exceeding the $50,000 micro-purchase threshold and were selected for testing. The Cooperative did not obtain price or rate quotes for two of the three vendors and there was no documentation detailing the history of the procurement, which must include the reason for the procurement method used. Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with federal award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to contracts, for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (i.e. grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the SAM exclusions, collecting a certification from that vendor, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that vendor. Upon inquiry of the Cooperative in order to review the procedures in place for verifying that a vendor with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded, the Cooperative disclosed there were not any documented controls or procedures. Nine covered transactions were identified. The covered transactions, totaling $803,836, were selected for testing. The Cooperative did not verify the suspension and debarment status of the tested vendors prior to payment. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic throughout the audit period. Identification as a repeat finding: No. Recommendation: We recommended that the Cooperative’s management design and implement a system of internal controls related to procurement and suspension and debarment procedures to ensure procurement requirements are met and to ensure entities are neither suspended nor debarred, or otherwise excluded or disqualified prior to entering into any covered transactions. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
Information on the federal program: Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States; Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027X; 84.173X Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 22611-042-ARP; 22619-042-ARP Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Qualified Opinion Criteria: 2 CFR 200.313(d) states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)...." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non- Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases — (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . .” (b) Formal Procurement Methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal financial assistance award exceeds the SAT, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require following documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a non-competitive procurement can be used in accordance with § 200.319 or paragraph (c) of this section. The following formal methods of procurement are used for pro procurement of property or services above the simplified acquisition threshold or a value below the simplified acquisition threshold the non-Federal entity determines to be appropriate: . . . (1) Sealed bids. A procurement method in which bids are publicly solicited and a firm fixed-price contract (lump sum or unit price) is awarded to the responsible bidder whose bid, conforming with all the material terms and conditions of the invitation for bids, is the lowest in price. The sealed bids method is the preferred method for procuring construction, if the conditions. . . .” (2) Proposals. A procurement method in which either a fixed price or cost-reimbursement type contract is awarded. Proposals are generally used when conditions are not appropriate for the use of sealed bids. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: “When you enter into a covered transaction with another person as the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person.” Condition: The School Corporation did not have internal controls in place to ensure that the Cooperative complied with the procurement and the suspension and debarment requirements. The Cooperative did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that the requirements for the simplified acquisition threshold and for small purchases were met for each applicable procured good or service or to ensure that vendors were not suspended or debarred prior to entering into a covered transaction. Cause: The Cooperative noted that ARP portion of the Special Education grant was new for the 2022-2023 and 2023-2024 school years. The ARP funding gave opportunity for types of expenditures that do not typically get expensed using Special Education funding. The transactions noted within the Condition and Context were from the ARP portion of the grant, which provided property or services that exceeded the micro-purchase threshold. Management of the Cooperative was unaware of the procurement requirements when property or services exceed the micro-purchase threshold. In addition, management of the Cooperative was unaware of the Suspension and Debarment requirements when a covered transaction is expected to equal or exceed $25,000. Effect: Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, including policies and procedures that provide segregation of duties and additional oversight as needed, the control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. Without following the required methods for procurement, the Cooperative could be overpaying for services. Unverified vendors to whom payments equal to or in excess of $25,000 could be suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the reduction of future federal funding to the Cooperative. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: The School Corporation is a member of the Northeast Indiana Special Education Cooperative (Cooperative). During fiscal years 2022-2023 and 2023-2024, the Cooperative operated the special education program and spent the federal money on behalf of all its members. As the grant agreement was between the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE) and each member school, the School Corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. When the value of the procurement for property or services exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), or a lower threshold established by a nonfederal entity, formal procurement methods are required. The SAT is typically set at $250,000. However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold. Therefore, the SAT threshold is set at $150,000. Formal procurement methods require adherence to documented procedures and formal methods such as sealed bids or proposals. When the purchase value exceeds the micro-purchase threshold but is less than the simplified acquisition threshold, a small purchase occurs. Small purchases require documented full and open competition or a documented rationale for limited competition. For fiscal year 2023, the Cooperative had one vendor, with disbursements totaling $379,313, which exceeded the SAT threshold of $150,000. The Cooperative did not obtain sealed bids or competitive proposals nor was there documentation detailing the history of the procurement, which must include the reason for the procurement method used. For fiscal year 2023, the Cooperative had one vendor with disbursements in the amount of $55,374, which were less than the SAT threshold of $150,000, but exceeded the $50,000 micro-purchase threshold and was selected for testing. The Cooperative did not obtain price or rate quotes nor was there documentation detailing the history of the procurement, which must include the reason for the procurement method used. For fiscal year 2024, three vendors with disbursements totaling $175,125, were identified as being less than the simplified acquisition threshold of $150,000, but exceeding the $50,000 micro-purchase threshold and were selected for testing. The Cooperative did not obtain price or rate quotes for two of the three vendors and there was no documentation detailing the history of the procurement, which must include the reason for the procurement method used. Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with federal award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to contracts, for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (i.e. grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the SAM exclusions, collecting a certification from that vendor, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that vendor. Upon inquiry of the Cooperative in order to review the procedures in place for verifying that a vendor with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded, the Cooperative disclosed there were not any documented controls or procedures. Nine covered transactions were identified. The covered transactions, totaling $803,836, were selected for testing. The Cooperative did not verify the suspension and debarment status of the tested vendors prior to payment. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic throughout the audit period. Identification as a repeat finding: No. Recommendation: We recommended that the Cooperative’s management design and implement a system of internal controls related to procurement and suspension and debarment procedures to ensure procurement requirements are met and to ensure entities are neither suspended nor debarred, or otherwise excluded or disqualified prior to entering into any covered transactions. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
Finding Number: 2024-002 Repeat Finding: Yes, 2023-002, 2022-002 Program Names/Assistance Listing Titles: Assistance Listing Numbers: Federal Award Numbers: Questioned Costs: Indian School Equalization 15.042 A23AV00813 N/A Administrative Cost Grants for Indian Schools 15.046 A23AV00813 N/A Federal Agency(ies): U.S. Department of Interior Pass-Through Agency(ies): Bureau of Indian Education Type of Finding: Noncompliance, Significant Deficiency Compliance Requirements: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Criteria Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making sub awards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include those procurement contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR §180.220. Additionally, the School should adhere to procurement methods outlined in 2 CFR §200.320. Condition Verification of suspension and debarment was not performed for all vendors with whom the School spent at least $25,000 using federal grant monies. Additionally, the School did not follow federal guidelines for purchases exceeding the small purchases threshold. Cause The School’s internal controls over procurement of goods and services were not adequate. Effect The School was not in compliance with federal regulations and guidelines related to suspension and debarment or procurement. Context The School did not maintain documentation that a review to determine that vendors with whom the School spent greater than $25,000 were not suspended and debarred. The deficiency applied to two vendors with the Indian School Equalization Program and four vendors with the Administrative Cost Grants for Indian Schools. Additionally, for three non-cooperative-purchase vendors paid in excess of the small purchase threshold ($10,000), the School did not prepare and maintain documentation for at least 3 written quotes from qualified sources, one instance from the Indian School Equalization Program and two instances from the Administrative Cost Grants for Indian Schools. The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendation The School should review documented policies and implement them in school procedures to ensure compliance with federal procurement requirements. Views of Responsible Officials See Corrective Action Plan.
Finding Number: 2024-002 Repeat Finding: Yes, 2023-002, 2022-002 Program Names/Assistance Listing Titles: Assistance Listing Numbers: Federal Award Numbers: Questioned Costs: Indian School Equalization 15.042 A23AV00813 N/A Administrative Cost Grants for Indian Schools 15.046 A23AV00813 N/A Federal Agency(ies): U.S. Department of Interior Pass-Through Agency(ies): Bureau of Indian Education Type of Finding: Noncompliance, Significant Deficiency Compliance Requirements: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Criteria Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making sub awards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include those procurement contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR §180.220. Additionally, the School should adhere to procurement methods outlined in 2 CFR §200.320. Condition Verification of suspension and debarment was not performed for all vendors with whom the School spent at least $25,000 using federal grant monies. Additionally, the School did not follow federal guidelines for purchases exceeding the small purchases threshold. Cause The School’s internal controls over procurement of goods and services were not adequate. Effect The School was not in compliance with federal regulations and guidelines related to suspension and debarment or procurement. Context The School did not maintain documentation that a review to determine that vendors with whom the School spent greater than $25,000 were not suspended and debarred. The deficiency applied to two vendors with the Indian School Equalization Program and four vendors with the Administrative Cost Grants for Indian Schools. Additionally, for three non-cooperative-purchase vendors paid in excess of the small purchase threshold ($10,000), the School did not prepare and maintain documentation for at least 3 written quotes from qualified sources, one instance from the Indian School Equalization Program and two instances from the Administrative Cost Grants for Indian Schools. The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendation The School should review documented policies and implement them in school procedures to ensure compliance with federal procurement requirements. Views of Responsible Officials See Corrective Action Plan.
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY IN INTERNAL CONTROL OVER COMPLIANCE 2024-008: U.S. Department of the Treasury ARPA Coronavirus State and Local Recovery Funds, ALN 21.027 Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment Criteria: Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform guidance) requires non-federal entities other than States to follow their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable State and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. This includes using the small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(b). Condition, Cause, and Effect/Potential Effect: Internal controls at the County were not sufficient to ensure full and open competition on grant-funded contracts. Individuals involved in the procurement process incorrectly relied on NRS requirements instead of the County’s procurement policy and federal procurement guidelines. Questioned Costs: None noted. Context: A nonstatistical sample of the procurement transactions funded with the ARPA Coronavirus State and Local Recovery Funds revealed that the County did not conduct procurement transactions in a manner providing on two construction contracts. Recommendation: We recommend that the County provide additional training to grantoversight personnel and ensure controls are sufficiently enhanced to ensure procurement policies are followed on federal grant-funded purchases. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: We agree with this finding and will enhance control procedures as recommended. Repeat Finding from Prior Year: No
Finding 2024-001: Reportable Finding Considered a Significant Deficiency – Procurement Policies Not Followed Program Name: Continuum of Care Assistance listing #: 14.267 Federal Awarding Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Compliance Requirement: Procurement Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2) price quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources for the acquisition of property or services for which the aggregate dollar amount is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. Condition: The Organization did not follow the small purchase procedures applicable to their procurement policy (for procurements between $10,000 and $250,000). Cause: Many expenses were split between multiple programs over the course of the program. While the expenditures were individually within the micro-purchase threshold; when combined, the amounts exceeded this threshold. Effect: The Organization did not adequately meet the requirements for their procurement policy which notes that the Organization should perform a cost/price analysis on their contractors. Repeat Finding: This is a repeat finding. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs related to this finding. Recommendation: We recommend the Organization receive price quotations for all material purchases and recurring expenditures relevant to federal awards.
Finding 2024-001: Reportable Finding Considered a Significant Deficiency – Procurement Policies Not Followed Program Name: Continuum of Care Assistance listing #: 14.267 Federal Awarding Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Compliance Requirement: Procurement Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2) price quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources for the acquisition of property or services for which the aggregate dollar amount is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. Condition: The Organization did not follow the small purchase procedures applicable to their procurement policy (for procurements between $10,000 and $250,000). Cause: Many expenses were split between multiple programs over the course of the program. While the expenditures were individually within the micro-purchase threshold; when combined, the amounts exceeded this threshold. Effect: The Organization did not adequately meet the requirements for their procurement policy which notes that the Organization should perform a cost/price analysis on their contractors. Repeat Finding: This is a repeat finding. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs related to this finding. Recommendation: We recommend the Organization receive price quotations for all material purchases and recurring expenditures relevant to federal awards.
FINDING 2024-004 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: COVID-19 - Special Education Grants to States, COVID-19 - Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.173 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 22611-042-ARP, 22619-042-ARP Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context The School Corporation is a member of the Northeast Indiana Special Education Cooperative (Cooperative). During fiscal years 2022-2023 and 2023-2024, the Cooperative operated the special education program and spent the federal money on behalf of all its members. As the grant agreement was between the Indiana Department of Education and each member school, the School Corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. The School Corporation did not have internal controls in place to ensure that the Cooperative complied with the procurement and the suspension and debarment requirements. The Cooperative did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that the requirements for the simplified acquisition threshold and for small purchases were met for each applicable procured good or service or to ensure that vendors were not suspended or debarred prior to entering into a covered transaction. Procurement When the value of the procurement for property or services exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), or a lower threshold established by a nonfederal entity, formal procurement methods are required. The SAT is typically set at $250,000. However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold. Therefore, the SAT threshold is set at $150,000. Formal procurement methods require adherence to documented procedures and formal methods such as sealed bids or proposals. When the purchase value exceeds the micro-purchase threshold but is less than the simplified acquisition threshold, a small purchase occurs. Small purchases require documented full and open competition or a documented rationale for limited competition. For 2022-2023, the Cooperative had one vendor, with disbursements totaling $379,313, which exceeded the SAT threshold of $150,000. The Cooperative did not obtain sealed bids or competitive proposals nor was there documentation detailing the history of the procurement, which must include the reason for the procurement method used. For 2022-2023, the Cooperative had one vendor with disbursements in the amount of $55,374, which were less than the SAT threshold of $150,000 but exceeded the $50,000 micro-purchase threshold and was selected for testing. The Cooperative did not obtain price or rate quotes nor was there documentation detailing the history of the procurement, which must include the reason for the procurement method used. For 2023-2024, three vendors with disbursements totaling $175,125 were identified as being less than the simplified acquisition threshold of $150,000 but exceeding the $50,000 micropurchase threshold and were selected for testing. The Cooperative did not obtain price or rate quotes for two of the three vendors and there was no documentation detailing the history of the procurement, which must include the reason for the procurement method used. Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with federal award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts, for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the SAM exclusions, collecting a certification from that vendor, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that vendor. Upon inquiry of the Cooperative in order to review the procedures in place for verifying that a vendor with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded, the Cooperative disclosed there were not any documented internal controls or procedures. Nine covered transactions were identified. The covered transactions, totaling $803,836, were selected for testing. The Cooperative did not verify the suspension and debarment status of the tested vendors prior to payment. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases — (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . . (b) Formal Procurement Methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal financial assistance award exceeds the SAT, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require following documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a non-competitive procurement can be used in accordance with § 200.319 or paragraph (c) of this section. The following formal methods of procurement are used for procurement of property or services above the simplified acquisition threshold or a value below the simplified acquisition threshold the non-Federal entity determines to be appropriate: . . . (1) Sealed bids. A procurement method in which bids are publicly solicited and a firm fixed-price contract (lump sum or unit price) is awarded to the responsible bidder whose bid, conforming with all the material terms and conditions of the invitation for bids, is the lowest in price. The sealed bids method is the preferred method for procuring construction, if the conditions. . . . (2) Proposals. A procurement method in which either a fixed price or cost-reimbursement type contract is awarded. Proposals are generally used when conditions are not appropriate for the use of sealed bids. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM.gov Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause The Cooperative noted that the ARP portion of the Special Education grant was new for 2022-2023 and 2023-2024. The ARP funding gave opportunity for types of expenditures that do not typically get expensed using Special Education funding. The transactions noted within the Condition and Context were from the ARP portion of the grant, which provided property or services that exceeded the micro-purchase threshold. Management of the Cooperative was unaware of the procurement requirements when property or services exceed the micro-purchase threshold. In addition, management of the Cooperative was unaware of the suspension and debarment requirements when a covered transaction is expected to equal or exceed $25,000. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, including policies and procedures that provide segregation of duties and additional oversight as needed, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. Without following the required methods for procurement, the Cooperative could be overpaying for services. Unverified vendors to whom payments equal to or in excess of $25,000 could be suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the reduction of future federal funding to the Cooperative. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the Cooperative's management design and implement a system of internal controls related to procurement and suspension and debarment procedures to ensure procurement requirements are met and to ensure entities are neither suspended nor debarred, or otherwise excluded or disqualified prior to entering into any covered transactions. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-004 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: COVID-19 - Special Education Grants to States, COVID-19 - Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.173 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 22611-042-ARP, 22619-042-ARP Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context The School Corporation is a member of the Northeast Indiana Special Education Cooperative (Cooperative). During fiscal years 2022-2023 and 2023-2024, the Cooperative operated the special education program and spent the federal money on behalf of all its members. As the grant agreement was between the Indiana Department of Education and each member school, the School Corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. The School Corporation did not have internal controls in place to ensure that the Cooperative complied with the procurement and the suspension and debarment requirements. The Cooperative did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that the requirements for the simplified acquisition threshold and for small purchases were met for each applicable procured good or service or to ensure that vendors were not suspended or debarred prior to entering into a covered transaction. Procurement When the value of the procurement for property or services exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), or a lower threshold established by a nonfederal entity, formal procurement methods are required. The SAT is typically set at $250,000. However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold. Therefore, the SAT threshold is set at $150,000. Formal procurement methods require adherence to documented procedures and formal methods such as sealed bids or proposals. When the purchase value exceeds the micro-purchase threshold but is less than the simplified acquisition threshold, a small purchase occurs. Small purchases require documented full and open competition or a documented rationale for limited competition. For 2022-2023, the Cooperative had one vendor, with disbursements totaling $379,313, which exceeded the SAT threshold of $150,000. The Cooperative did not obtain sealed bids or competitive proposals nor was there documentation detailing the history of the procurement, which must include the reason for the procurement method used. For 2022-2023, the Cooperative had one vendor with disbursements in the amount of $55,374, which were less than the SAT threshold of $150,000 but exceeded the $50,000 micro-purchase threshold and was selected for testing. The Cooperative did not obtain price or rate quotes nor was there documentation detailing the history of the procurement, which must include the reason for the procurement method used. For 2023-2024, three vendors with disbursements totaling $175,125 were identified as being less than the simplified acquisition threshold of $150,000 but exceeding the $50,000 micropurchase threshold and were selected for testing. The Cooperative did not obtain price or rate quotes for two of the three vendors and there was no documentation detailing the history of the procurement, which must include the reason for the procurement method used. Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with federal award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts, for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the SAM exclusions, collecting a certification from that vendor, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that vendor. Upon inquiry of the Cooperative in order to review the procedures in place for verifying that a vendor with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded, the Cooperative disclosed there were not any documented internal controls or procedures. Nine covered transactions were identified. The covered transactions, totaling $803,836, were selected for testing. The Cooperative did not verify the suspension and debarment status of the tested vendors prior to payment. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases — (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . . (b) Formal Procurement Methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal financial assistance award exceeds the SAT, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require following documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a non-competitive procurement can be used in accordance with § 200.319 or paragraph (c) of this section. The following formal methods of procurement are used for procurement of property or services above the simplified acquisition threshold or a value below the simplified acquisition threshold the non-Federal entity determines to be appropriate: . . . (1) Sealed bids. A procurement method in which bids are publicly solicited and a firm fixed-price contract (lump sum or unit price) is awarded to the responsible bidder whose bid, conforming with all the material terms and conditions of the invitation for bids, is the lowest in price. The sealed bids method is the preferred method for procuring construction, if the conditions. . . . (2) Proposals. A procurement method in which either a fixed price or cost-reimbursement type contract is awarded. Proposals are generally used when conditions are not appropriate for the use of sealed bids. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM.gov Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause The Cooperative noted that the ARP portion of the Special Education grant was new for 2022-2023 and 2023-2024. The ARP funding gave opportunity for types of expenditures that do not typically get expensed using Special Education funding. The transactions noted within the Condition and Context were from the ARP portion of the grant, which provided property or services that exceeded the micro-purchase threshold. Management of the Cooperative was unaware of the procurement requirements when property or services exceed the micro-purchase threshold. In addition, management of the Cooperative was unaware of the suspension and debarment requirements when a covered transaction is expected to equal or exceed $25,000. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, including policies and procedures that provide segregation of duties and additional oversight as needed, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. Without following the required methods for procurement, the Cooperative could be overpaying for services. Unverified vendors to whom payments equal to or in excess of $25,000 could be suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the reduction of future federal funding to the Cooperative. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the Cooperative's management design and implement a system of internal controls related to procurement and suspension and debarment procedures to ensure procurement requirements are met and to ensure entities are neither suspended nor debarred, or otherwise excluded or disqualified prior to entering into any covered transactions. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-004 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: COVID-19 - Special Education Grants to States, COVID-19 - Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.173 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 22611-042-ARP, 22619-042-ARP Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context The School Corporation is a member of the Northeast Indiana Special Education Cooperative (Cooperative). During fiscal years 2022-2023 and 2023-2024, the Cooperative operated the special education program and spent the federal money on behalf of all its members. As the grant agreement was between the Indiana Department of Education and each member school, the School Corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. The School Corporation did not have internal controls in place to ensure that the Cooperative complied with the procurement and the suspension and debarment requirements. The Cooperative did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that the requirements for the simplified acquisition threshold and for small purchases were met for each applicable procured good or service or to ensure that vendors were not suspended or debarred prior to entering into a covered transaction. Procurement When the value of the procurement for property or services exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), or a lower threshold established by a nonfederal entity, formal procurement methods are required. The SAT is typically set at $250,000. However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold. Therefore, the SAT threshold is set at $150,000. Formal procurement methods require adherence to documented procedures and formal methods such as sealed bids or proposals. When the purchase value exceeds the micro-purchase threshold but is less than the simplified acquisition threshold, a small purchase occurs. Small purchases require documented full and open competition or a documented rationale for limited competition. For 2022-2023, the Cooperative had one vendor, with disbursements totaling $379,313, which exceeded the SAT threshold of $150,000. The Cooperative did not obtain sealed bids or competitive proposals nor was there documentation detailing the history of the procurement, which must include the reason for the procurement method used. For 2022-2023, the Cooperative had one vendor with disbursements in the amount of $55,374, which were less than the SAT threshold of $150,000 but exceeded the $50,000 micro-purchase threshold and was selected for testing. The Cooperative did not obtain price or rate quotes nor was there documentation detailing the history of the procurement, which must include the reason for the procurement method used. For 2023-2024, three vendors with disbursements totaling $175,125 were identified as being less than the simplified acquisition threshold of $150,000 but exceeding the $50,000 micropurchase threshold and were selected for testing. The Cooperative did not obtain price or rate quotes for two of the three vendors and there was no documentation detailing the history of the procurement, which must include the reason for the procurement method used. Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with federal award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts, for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the SAM exclusions, collecting a certification from that vendor, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that vendor. Upon inquiry of the Cooperative in order to review the procedures in place for verifying that a vendor with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded, the Cooperative disclosed there were not any documented internal controls or procedures. Nine covered transactions were identified. The covered transactions, totaling $803,836, were selected for testing. The Cooperative did not verify the suspension and debarment status of the tested vendors prior to payment. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases — (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . . (b) Formal Procurement Methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal financial assistance award exceeds the SAT, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require following documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a non-competitive procurement can be used in accordance with § 200.319 or paragraph (c) of this section. The following formal methods of procurement are used for procurement of property or services above the simplified acquisition threshold or a value below the simplified acquisition threshold the non-Federal entity determines to be appropriate: . . . (1) Sealed bids. A procurement method in which bids are publicly solicited and a firm fixed-price contract (lump sum or unit price) is awarded to the responsible bidder whose bid, conforming with all the material terms and conditions of the invitation for bids, is the lowest in price. The sealed bids method is the preferred method for procuring construction, if the conditions. . . . (2) Proposals. A procurement method in which either a fixed price or cost-reimbursement type contract is awarded. Proposals are generally used when conditions are not appropriate for the use of sealed bids. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM.gov Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause The Cooperative noted that the ARP portion of the Special Education grant was new for 2022-2023 and 2023-2024. The ARP funding gave opportunity for types of expenditures that do not typically get expensed using Special Education funding. The transactions noted within the Condition and Context were from the ARP portion of the grant, which provided property or services that exceeded the micro-purchase threshold. Management of the Cooperative was unaware of the procurement requirements when property or services exceed the micro-purchase threshold. In addition, management of the Cooperative was unaware of the suspension and debarment requirements when a covered transaction is expected to equal or exceed $25,000. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, including policies and procedures that provide segregation of duties and additional oversight as needed, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. Without following the required methods for procurement, the Cooperative could be overpaying for services. Unverified vendors to whom payments equal to or in excess of $25,000 could be suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the reduction of future federal funding to the Cooperative. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the Cooperative's management design and implement a system of internal controls related to procurement and suspension and debarment procedures to ensure procurement requirements are met and to ensure entities are neither suspended nor debarred, or otherwise excluded or disqualified prior to entering into any covered transactions. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-004 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: COVID-19 - Special Education Grants to States, COVID-19 - Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.173 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 22611-042-ARP, 22619-042-ARP Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context The School Corporation is a member of the Northeast Indiana Special Education Cooperative (Cooperative). During fiscal years 2022-2023 and 2023-2024, the Cooperative operated the special education program and spent the federal money on behalf of all its members. As the grant agreement was between the Indiana Department of Education and each member school, the School Corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. The School Corporation did not have internal controls in place to ensure that the Cooperative complied with the procurement and the suspension and debarment requirements. The Cooperative did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that the requirements for the simplified acquisition threshold and for small purchases were met for each applicable procured good or service or to ensure that vendors were not suspended or debarred prior to entering into a covered transaction. Procurement When the value of the procurement for property or services exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), or a lower threshold established by a nonfederal entity, formal procurement methods are required. The SAT is typically set at $250,000. However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold. Therefore, the SAT threshold is set at $150,000. Formal procurement methods require adherence to documented procedures and formal methods such as sealed bids or proposals. When the purchase value exceeds the micro-purchase threshold but is less than the simplified acquisition threshold, a small purchase occurs. Small purchases require documented full and open competition or a documented rationale for limited competition. For 2022-2023, the Cooperative had one vendor, with disbursements totaling $379,313, which exceeded the SAT threshold of $150,000. The Cooperative did not obtain sealed bids or competitive proposals nor was there documentation detailing the history of the procurement, which must include the reason for the procurement method used. For 2022-2023, the Cooperative had one vendor with disbursements in the amount of $55,374, which were less than the SAT threshold of $150,000 but exceeded the $50,000 micro-purchase threshold and was selected for testing. The Cooperative did not obtain price or rate quotes nor was there documentation detailing the history of the procurement, which must include the reason for the procurement method used. For 2023-2024, three vendors with disbursements totaling $175,125 were identified as being less than the simplified acquisition threshold of $150,000 but exceeding the $50,000 micropurchase threshold and were selected for testing. The Cooperative did not obtain price or rate quotes for two of the three vendors and there was no documentation detailing the history of the procurement, which must include the reason for the procurement method used. Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with federal award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts, for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the SAM exclusions, collecting a certification from that vendor, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that vendor. Upon inquiry of the Cooperative in order to review the procedures in place for verifying that a vendor with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded, the Cooperative disclosed there were not any documented internal controls or procedures. Nine covered transactions were identified. The covered transactions, totaling $803,836, were selected for testing. The Cooperative did not verify the suspension and debarment status of the tested vendors prior to payment. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases — (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . . (b) Formal Procurement Methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal financial assistance award exceeds the SAT, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require following documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a non-competitive procurement can be used in accordance with § 200.319 or paragraph (c) of this section. The following formal methods of procurement are used for procurement of property or services above the simplified acquisition threshold or a value below the simplified acquisition threshold the non-Federal entity determines to be appropriate: . . . (1) Sealed bids. A procurement method in which bids are publicly solicited and a firm fixed-price contract (lump sum or unit price) is awarded to the responsible bidder whose bid, conforming with all the material terms and conditions of the invitation for bids, is the lowest in price. The sealed bids method is the preferred method for procuring construction, if the conditions. . . . (2) Proposals. A procurement method in which either a fixed price or cost-reimbursement type contract is awarded. Proposals are generally used when conditions are not appropriate for the use of sealed bids. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM.gov Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause The Cooperative noted that the ARP portion of the Special Education grant was new for 2022-2023 and 2023-2024. The ARP funding gave opportunity for types of expenditures that do not typically get expensed using Special Education funding. The transactions noted within the Condition and Context were from the ARP portion of the grant, which provided property or services that exceeded the micro-purchase threshold. Management of the Cooperative was unaware of the procurement requirements when property or services exceed the micro-purchase threshold. In addition, management of the Cooperative was unaware of the suspension and debarment requirements when a covered transaction is expected to equal or exceed $25,000. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, including policies and procedures that provide segregation of duties and additional oversight as needed, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. Without following the required methods for procurement, the Cooperative could be overpaying for services. Unverified vendors to whom payments equal to or in excess of $25,000 could be suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the reduction of future federal funding to the Cooperative. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the Cooperative's management design and implement a system of internal controls related to procurement and suspension and debarment procedures to ensure procurement requirements are met and to ensure entities are neither suspended nor debarred, or otherwise excluded or disqualified prior to entering into any covered transactions. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
Finding Number: 2024‐002 Repeat Finding: No Program Names/Assistance Listing Titles: Assistance Listing Numbers: Federal Award Numbers: Questioned Costs: Indian School Equalization 15.042 A23AV00864 N/A Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies 84.010 A23AV00864 N/A Federal Agency(ies): U.S. Department of the Interior; U.S. Department of Education Pass‐Through Agency: Bureau of Indian Education Type of Finding: Noncompliance, Significant Deficiency Compliance Requirement: Procurement Criteria The Board should have adopted policies in accordance with 2 CFR §200.320 that requires the collection of quotes for purchases of at least $10,000 but no more than $250,000, and formal bid procedures for purchases over $250,000. Condition The School did not follow federal guidelines for purchases exceeding the small purchases threshold. Cause The School has not implemented controls to perform the collection of quotes. There has been turnover in various key positions. Effect The School was not in compliance with the Board adopted policies and federal guidelines. Context The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. During our review of procurement requirements, we noted that the School did not prepare and maintain documentation for at least three written quotes from qualified sources, two instances from the Indian School Equalization Program, and three instances from the Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies program. Recommendation The School should adopt and adhere to federal regulations and implement procedures for performing procurement, and should train multiple employees on the procurement process. Views of Responsible Officials See Corrective Action Plan.
Finding Number: 2024‐002 Repeat Finding: No Program Names/Assistance Listing Titles: Assistance Listing Numbers: Federal Award Numbers: Questioned Costs: Indian School Equalization 15.042 A23AV00864 N/A Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies 84.010 A23AV00864 N/A Federal Agency(ies): U.S. Department of the Interior; U.S. Department of Education Pass‐Through Agency: Bureau of Indian Education Type of Finding: Noncompliance, Significant Deficiency Compliance Requirement: Procurement Criteria The Board should have adopted policies in accordance with 2 CFR §200.320 that requires the collection of quotes for purchases of at least $10,000 but no more than $250,000, and formal bid procedures for purchases over $250,000. Condition The School did not follow federal guidelines for purchases exceeding the small purchases threshold. Cause The School has not implemented controls to perform the collection of quotes. There has been turnover in various key positions. Effect The School was not in compliance with the Board adopted policies and federal guidelines. Context The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. During our review of procurement requirements, we noted that the School did not prepare and maintain documentation for at least three written quotes from qualified sources, two instances from the Indian School Equalization Program, and three instances from the Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies program. Recommendation The School should adopt and adhere to federal regulations and implement procedures for performing procurement, and should train multiple employees on the procurement process. Views of Responsible Officials See Corrective Action Plan.