Finding 2024-001: Lack of Reasonable Price Documentation for Micro-Purchases Other Matter – Noncompliance/Significant deficiency Identification of federal programs: 98.001 USAID Foreign Assistance for Programs Overseas Criteria: According to 2 CFR § 200.320(a)(1)(ii), recipients of federal funds may use micro-purchase procedures without soliciting competitive quotations only if the price is considered reasonable and documentation is maintained to support this determination. Condition: During our review of micro-purchase transactions, we identified transactions that lacked contemporaneous documentation supporting a reasonable price determination. Cause: IRI’s management did not retain documentation in compliance with the above criteria. Effect or potential effect: The absence of timely documentation undermines the assurance that federal funds were used in accordance with procurement standards. Questioned costs: None Context: From the sample of 40 micro-purchase transactions, half lacked proper contemporaneous documentation supporting a reasonable price determination. We did note that proper approvals were sited for any vendor agreements, invoices, and journal entries as applicable noting due diligence was performed. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that IRI reinforce training on procurement documentation requirements, implement stronger internal controls to ensure compliance at the time of purchase, and conduct periodic reviews to verify adherence to policy. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan.
Finding 2024-001: Lack of Reasonable Price Documentation for Micro-Purchases Other Matter – Noncompliance/Significant deficiency Identification of federal programs: 98.001 USAID Foreign Assistance for Programs Overseas Criteria: According to 2 CFR § 200.320(a)(1)(ii), recipients of federal funds may use micro-purchase procedures without soliciting competitive quotations only if the price is considered reasonable and documentation is maintained to support this determination. Condition: During our review of micro-purchase transactions, we identified transactions that lacked contemporaneous documentation supporting a reasonable price determination. Cause: IRI’s management did not retain documentation in compliance with the above criteria. Effect or potential effect: The absence of timely documentation undermines the assurance that federal funds were used in accordance with procurement standards. Questioned costs: None Context: From the sample of 40 micro-purchase transactions, half lacked proper contemporaneous documentation supporting a reasonable price determination. We did note that proper approvals were sited for any vendor agreements, invoices, and journal entries as applicable noting due diligence was performed. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that IRI reinforce training on procurement documentation requirements, implement stronger internal controls to ensure compliance at the time of purchase, and conduct periodic reviews to verify adherence to policy. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan.
Finding 2024-001: Lack of Reasonable Price Documentation for Micro-Purchases Other Matter – Noncompliance/Significant deficiency Identification of federal programs: 98.001 USAID Foreign Assistance for Programs Overseas Criteria: According to 2 CFR § 200.320(a)(1)(ii), recipients of federal funds may use micro-purchase procedures without soliciting competitive quotations only if the price is considered reasonable and documentation is maintained to support this determination. Condition: During our review of micro-purchase transactions, we identified transactions that lacked contemporaneous documentation supporting a reasonable price determination. Cause: IRI’s management did not retain documentation in compliance with the above criteria. Effect or potential effect: The absence of timely documentation undermines the assurance that federal funds were used in accordance with procurement standards. Questioned costs: None Context: From the sample of 40 micro-purchase transactions, half lacked proper contemporaneous documentation supporting a reasonable price determination. We did note that proper approvals were sited for any vendor agreements, invoices, and journal entries as applicable noting due diligence was performed. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that IRI reinforce training on procurement documentation requirements, implement stronger internal controls to ensure compliance at the time of purchase, and conduct periodic reviews to verify adherence to policy. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan.
Finding 2024-001: Lack of Reasonable Price Documentation for Micro-Purchases Other Matter – Noncompliance/Significant deficiency Identification of federal programs: 98.001 USAID Foreign Assistance for Programs Overseas Criteria: According to 2 CFR § 200.320(a)(1)(ii), recipients of federal funds may use micro-purchase procedures without soliciting competitive quotations only if the price is considered reasonable and documentation is maintained to support this determination. Condition: During our review of micro-purchase transactions, we identified transactions that lacked contemporaneous documentation supporting a reasonable price determination. Cause: IRI’s management did not retain documentation in compliance with the above criteria. Effect or potential effect: The absence of timely documentation undermines the assurance that federal funds were used in accordance with procurement standards. Questioned costs: None Context: From the sample of 40 micro-purchase transactions, half lacked proper contemporaneous documentation supporting a reasonable price determination. We did note that proper approvals were sited for any vendor agreements, invoices, and journal entries as applicable noting due diligence was performed. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that IRI reinforce training on procurement documentation requirements, implement stronger internal controls to ensure compliance at the time of purchase, and conduct periodic reviews to verify adherence to policy. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan.
Finding 2024-001: Lack of Reasonable Price Documentation for Micro-Purchases Other Matter – Noncompliance/Significant deficiency Identification of federal programs: 98.001 USAID Foreign Assistance for Programs Overseas Criteria: According to 2 CFR § 200.320(a)(1)(ii), recipients of federal funds may use micro-purchase procedures without soliciting competitive quotations only if the price is considered reasonable and documentation is maintained to support this determination. Condition: During our review of micro-purchase transactions, we identified transactions that lacked contemporaneous documentation supporting a reasonable price determination. Cause: IRI’s management did not retain documentation in compliance with the above criteria. Effect or potential effect: The absence of timely documentation undermines the assurance that federal funds were used in accordance with procurement standards. Questioned costs: None Context: From the sample of 40 micro-purchase transactions, half lacked proper contemporaneous documentation supporting a reasonable price determination. We did note that proper approvals were sited for any vendor agreements, invoices, and journal entries as applicable noting due diligence was performed. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that IRI reinforce training on procurement documentation requirements, implement stronger internal controls to ensure compliance at the time of purchase, and conduct periodic reviews to verify adherence to policy. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan.
Finding 2024-001: Lack of Reasonable Price Documentation for Micro-Purchases Other Matter – Noncompliance/Significant deficiency Identification of federal programs: 98.001 USAID Foreign Assistance for Programs Overseas Criteria: According to 2 CFR § 200.320(a)(1)(ii), recipients of federal funds may use micro-purchase procedures without soliciting competitive quotations only if the price is considered reasonable and documentation is maintained to support this determination. Condition: During our review of micro-purchase transactions, we identified transactions that lacked contemporaneous documentation supporting a reasonable price determination. Cause: IRI’s management did not retain documentation in compliance with the above criteria. Effect or potential effect: The absence of timely documentation undermines the assurance that federal funds were used in accordance with procurement standards. Questioned costs: None Context: From the sample of 40 micro-purchase transactions, half lacked proper contemporaneous documentation supporting a reasonable price determination. We did note that proper approvals were sited for any vendor agreements, invoices, and journal entries as applicable noting due diligence was performed. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that IRI reinforce training on procurement documentation requirements, implement stronger internal controls to ensure compliance at the time of purchase, and conduct periodic reviews to verify adherence to policy. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan.
Finding 2024-001: Lack of Reasonable Price Documentation for Micro-Purchases Other Matter – Noncompliance/Significant deficiency Identification of federal programs: 98.001 USAID Foreign Assistance for Programs Overseas Criteria: According to 2 CFR § 200.320(a)(1)(ii), recipients of federal funds may use micro-purchase procedures without soliciting competitive quotations only if the price is considered reasonable and documentation is maintained to support this determination. Condition: During our review of micro-purchase transactions, we identified transactions that lacked contemporaneous documentation supporting a reasonable price determination. Cause: IRI’s management did not retain documentation in compliance with the above criteria. Effect or potential effect: The absence of timely documentation undermines the assurance that federal funds were used in accordance with procurement standards. Questioned costs: None Context: From the sample of 40 micro-purchase transactions, half lacked proper contemporaneous documentation supporting a reasonable price determination. We did note that proper approvals were sited for any vendor agreements, invoices, and journal entries as applicable noting due diligence was performed. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that IRI reinforce training on procurement documentation requirements, implement stronger internal controls to ensure compliance at the time of purchase, and conduct periodic reviews to verify adherence to policy. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan.
Finding 2024-001: Lack of Reasonable Price Documentation for Micro-Purchases Other Matter – Noncompliance/Significant deficiency Identification of federal programs: 98.001 USAID Foreign Assistance for Programs Overseas Criteria: According to 2 CFR § 200.320(a)(1)(ii), recipients of federal funds may use micro-purchase procedures without soliciting competitive quotations only if the price is considered reasonable and documentation is maintained to support this determination. Condition: During our review of micro-purchase transactions, we identified transactions that lacked contemporaneous documentation supporting a reasonable price determination. Cause: IRI’s management did not retain documentation in compliance with the above criteria. Effect or potential effect: The absence of timely documentation undermines the assurance that federal funds were used in accordance with procurement standards. Questioned costs: None Context: From the sample of 40 micro-purchase transactions, half lacked proper contemporaneous documentation supporting a reasonable price determination. We did note that proper approvals were sited for any vendor agreements, invoices, and journal entries as applicable noting due diligence was performed. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that IRI reinforce training on procurement documentation requirements, implement stronger internal controls to ensure compliance at the time of purchase, and conduct periodic reviews to verify adherence to policy. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan.
Finding 2024-001: Lack of Reasonable Price Documentation for Micro-Purchases Other Matter – Noncompliance/Significant deficiency Identification of federal programs: 98.001 USAID Foreign Assistance for Programs Overseas Criteria: According to 2 CFR § 200.320(a)(1)(ii), recipients of federal funds may use micro-purchase procedures without soliciting competitive quotations only if the price is considered reasonable and documentation is maintained to support this determination. Condition: During our review of micro-purchase transactions, we identified transactions that lacked contemporaneous documentation supporting a reasonable price determination. Cause: IRI’s management did not retain documentation in compliance with the above criteria. Effect or potential effect: The absence of timely documentation undermines the assurance that federal funds were used in accordance with procurement standards. Questioned costs: None Context: From the sample of 40 micro-purchase transactions, half lacked proper contemporaneous documentation supporting a reasonable price determination. We did note that proper approvals were sited for any vendor agreements, invoices, and journal entries as applicable noting due diligence was performed. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that IRI reinforce training on procurement documentation requirements, implement stronger internal controls to ensure compliance at the time of purchase, and conduct periodic reviews to verify adherence to policy. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan.
Finding 2024-001: Lack of Reasonable Price Documentation for Micro-Purchases Other Matter – Noncompliance/Significant deficiency Identification of federal programs: 98.001 USAID Foreign Assistance for Programs Overseas Criteria: According to 2 CFR § 200.320(a)(1)(ii), recipients of federal funds may use micro-purchase procedures without soliciting competitive quotations only if the price is considered reasonable and documentation is maintained to support this determination. Condition: During our review of micro-purchase transactions, we identified transactions that lacked contemporaneous documentation supporting a reasonable price determination. Cause: IRI’s management did not retain documentation in compliance with the above criteria. Effect or potential effect: The absence of timely documentation undermines the assurance that federal funds were used in accordance with procurement standards. Questioned costs: None Context: From the sample of 40 micro-purchase transactions, half lacked proper contemporaneous documentation supporting a reasonable price determination. We did note that proper approvals were sited for any vendor agreements, invoices, and journal entries as applicable noting due diligence was performed. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that IRI reinforce training on procurement documentation requirements, implement stronger internal controls to ensure compliance at the time of purchase, and conduct periodic reviews to verify adherence to policy. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan.
Finding 2024-001: Lack of Reasonable Price Documentation for Micro-Purchases Other Matter – Noncompliance/Significant deficiency Identification of federal programs: 98.001 USAID Foreign Assistance for Programs Overseas Criteria: According to 2 CFR § 200.320(a)(1)(ii), recipients of federal funds may use micro-purchase procedures without soliciting competitive quotations only if the price is considered reasonable and documentation is maintained to support this determination. Condition: During our review of micro-purchase transactions, we identified transactions that lacked contemporaneous documentation supporting a reasonable price determination. Cause: IRI’s management did not retain documentation in compliance with the above criteria. Effect or potential effect: The absence of timely documentation undermines the assurance that federal funds were used in accordance with procurement standards. Questioned costs: None Context: From the sample of 40 micro-purchase transactions, half lacked proper contemporaneous documentation supporting a reasonable price determination. We did note that proper approvals were sited for any vendor agreements, invoices, and journal entries as applicable noting due diligence was performed. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that IRI reinforce training on procurement documentation requirements, implement stronger internal controls to ensure compliance at the time of purchase, and conduct periodic reviews to verify adherence to policy. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan.
Finding 2024-001: Lack of Reasonable Price Documentation for Micro-Purchases Other Matter – Noncompliance/Significant deficiency Identification of federal programs: 98.001 USAID Foreign Assistance for Programs Overseas Criteria: According to 2 CFR § 200.320(a)(1)(ii), recipients of federal funds may use micro-purchase procedures without soliciting competitive quotations only if the price is considered reasonable and documentation is maintained to support this determination. Condition: During our review of micro-purchase transactions, we identified transactions that lacked contemporaneous documentation supporting a reasonable price determination. Cause: IRI’s management did not retain documentation in compliance with the above criteria. Effect or potential effect: The absence of timely documentation undermines the assurance that federal funds were used in accordance with procurement standards. Questioned costs: None Context: From the sample of 40 micro-purchase transactions, half lacked proper contemporaneous documentation supporting a reasonable price determination. We did note that proper approvals were sited for any vendor agreements, invoices, and journal entries as applicable noting due diligence was performed. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that IRI reinforce training on procurement documentation requirements, implement stronger internal controls to ensure compliance at the time of purchase, and conduct periodic reviews to verify adherence to policy. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan.
Finding 2024-001: Lack of Reasonable Price Documentation for Micro-Purchases Other Matter – Noncompliance/Significant deficiency Identification of federal programs: 98.001 USAID Foreign Assistance for Programs Overseas Criteria: According to 2 CFR § 200.320(a)(1)(ii), recipients of federal funds may use micro-purchase procedures without soliciting competitive quotations only if the price is considered reasonable and documentation is maintained to support this determination. Condition: During our review of micro-purchase transactions, we identified transactions that lacked contemporaneous documentation supporting a reasonable price determination. Cause: IRI’s management did not retain documentation in compliance with the above criteria. Effect or potential effect: The absence of timely documentation undermines the assurance that federal funds were used in accordance with procurement standards. Questioned costs: None Context: From the sample of 40 micro-purchase transactions, half lacked proper contemporaneous documentation supporting a reasonable price determination. We did note that proper approvals were sited for any vendor agreements, invoices, and journal entries as applicable noting due diligence was performed. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that IRI reinforce training on procurement documentation requirements, implement stronger internal controls to ensure compliance at the time of purchase, and conduct periodic reviews to verify adherence to policy. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan.
Finding 2024-001: Lack of Reasonable Price Documentation for Micro-Purchases Other Matter – Noncompliance/Significant deficiency Identification of federal programs: 98.001 USAID Foreign Assistance for Programs Overseas Criteria: According to 2 CFR § 200.320(a)(1)(ii), recipients of federal funds may use micro-purchase procedures without soliciting competitive quotations only if the price is considered reasonable and documentation is maintained to support this determination. Condition: During our review of micro-purchase transactions, we identified transactions that lacked contemporaneous documentation supporting a reasonable price determination. Cause: IRI’s management did not retain documentation in compliance with the above criteria. Effect or potential effect: The absence of timely documentation undermines the assurance that federal funds were used in accordance with procurement standards. Questioned costs: None Context: From the sample of 40 micro-purchase transactions, half lacked proper contemporaneous documentation supporting a reasonable price determination. We did note that proper approvals were sited for any vendor agreements, invoices, and journal entries as applicable noting due diligence was performed. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that IRI reinforce training on procurement documentation requirements, implement stronger internal controls to ensure compliance at the time of purchase, and conduct periodic reviews to verify adherence to policy. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan.
Finding 2024-001: Lack of Reasonable Price Documentation for Micro-Purchases Other Matter – Noncompliance/Significant deficiency Identification of federal programs: 98.001 USAID Foreign Assistance for Programs Overseas Criteria: According to 2 CFR § 200.320(a)(1)(ii), recipients of federal funds may use micro-purchase procedures without soliciting competitive quotations only if the price is considered reasonable and documentation is maintained to support this determination. Condition: During our review of micro-purchase transactions, we identified transactions that lacked contemporaneous documentation supporting a reasonable price determination. Cause: IRI’s management did not retain documentation in compliance with the above criteria. Effect or potential effect: The absence of timely documentation undermines the assurance that federal funds were used in accordance with procurement standards. Questioned costs: None Context: From the sample of 40 micro-purchase transactions, half lacked proper contemporaneous documentation supporting a reasonable price determination. We did note that proper approvals were sited for any vendor agreements, invoices, and journal entries as applicable noting due diligence was performed. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that IRI reinforce training on procurement documentation requirements, implement stronger internal controls to ensure compliance at the time of purchase, and conduct periodic reviews to verify adherence to policy. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan.
Finding 2024-001: Lack of Reasonable Price Documentation for Micro-Purchases Other Matter – Noncompliance/Significant deficiency Identification of federal programs: 98.001 USAID Foreign Assistance for Programs Overseas Criteria: According to 2 CFR § 200.320(a)(1)(ii), recipients of federal funds may use micro-purchase procedures without soliciting competitive quotations only if the price is considered reasonable and documentation is maintained to support this determination. Condition: During our review of micro-purchase transactions, we identified transactions that lacked contemporaneous documentation supporting a reasonable price determination. Cause: IRI’s management did not retain documentation in compliance with the above criteria. Effect or potential effect: The absence of timely documentation undermines the assurance that federal funds were used in accordance with procurement standards. Questioned costs: None Context: From the sample of 40 micro-purchase transactions, half lacked proper contemporaneous documentation supporting a reasonable price determination. We did note that proper approvals were sited for any vendor agreements, invoices, and journal entries as applicable noting due diligence was performed. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that IRI reinforce training on procurement documentation requirements, implement stronger internal controls to ensure compliance at the time of purchase, and conduct periodic reviews to verify adherence to policy. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan.
Finding 2024-001: Lack of Reasonable Price Documentation for Micro-Purchases Other Matter – Noncompliance/Significant deficiency Identification of federal programs: 98.001 USAID Foreign Assistance for Programs Overseas Criteria: According to 2 CFR § 200.320(a)(1)(ii), recipients of federal funds may use micro-purchase procedures without soliciting competitive quotations only if the price is considered reasonable and documentation is maintained to support this determination. Condition: During our review of micro-purchase transactions, we identified transactions that lacked contemporaneous documentation supporting a reasonable price determination. Cause: IRI’s management did not retain documentation in compliance with the above criteria. Effect or potential effect: The absence of timely documentation undermines the assurance that federal funds were used in accordance with procurement standards. Questioned costs: None Context: From the sample of 40 micro-purchase transactions, half lacked proper contemporaneous documentation supporting a reasonable price determination. We did note that proper approvals were sited for any vendor agreements, invoices, and journal entries as applicable noting due diligence was performed. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that IRI reinforce training on procurement documentation requirements, implement stronger internal controls to ensure compliance at the time of purchase, and conduct periodic reviews to verify adherence to policy. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan.
Finding No.: 2024-002 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Federal Communications Commission AL Program: COVID-19 21.027 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Requirement: Procurement Questioned Costs: $150,676 Criteria: 2 CFR 200.1, defines State as any State of the United States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, U.S. Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, and any agency or instrumentality thereof exclusive of local governments. 2 CFR 200.317 requires that when conducting procurement transactions under a Federal award, a State or Indian Tribe must follow the same policies and procedures it uses for procurements with non-Federal funds. If such policies and procedures do not exist, States and Indian Tribes must follow the procurement standards in §§ 200.318 through 200.327. In addition to its own policies and procedures, a State or Indian Tribe must also comply with the following procurement standards: §§ 200.321, 200.322, 200.323, and 200.327. All other recipients and subrecipients, including subrecipients of a State or Indian Tribe, must follow the procurement standards in §§ 200.318 through 200.327. Effective July 1, 2019, GMHA Materials Management Policy and Procedure Manual (Policy No. 4.2) includes the following citations: All supplies, equipment and services purchased by Guam Memorial Hospital Authority (GMHA) shall be in accordance with the provisions of the Guam Procurement Law and GMHA Rules and Regulations as amended. Title 26 of the Guam Administrative Rules and Regulations (GARR) Chapter 16, sets forth as follows: §16308. Methods of Source Selection. Unless otherwise authorized by law, all hospital contracts shall be by competitive sealed bidding, pursuant to §16309 (Competitive Sealed Bidding) of these Regulations, except as provided in: (1) Section 16310 (Procurement from Non Profit Corporations); (2) Section 16311 (Small Purchases); (3) Section 16312 (Sole Source Procurement); (4) Section 16313 (Emergency Procurement); (5) Section 16314 (Competitive Selection Procedures for Services Specified in §16212); (6) Section 16507 (Architect-Engineer and Land Surveying Services); or (7) Section 16315 (Purchase of Drugs by Generic Names). §16309. Competitive Sealed Bidding. (a) Application. The provisions of this section apply to every procurement made by competitive sealed bidding, including multi-step bidding.§16309. Competitive Sealed Bidding. (a) Application. The provisions of this section apply to every procurement made by competitive sealed bidding, including multi-step bidding.§16311. Small Purchases. (1) Application. In accordance with 5 GCA §5213 (Small Purchases) of the GuamProcurement Act, this section is established for procurement of less than five thousand dollars ($5,000) for supplies or services and less than fifteen thousand dollars ($15,000) for construction.(b) Authority to Make Small Purchases. (1) Amount. The Hospital Administrator may use this section if the procurement is to be less than five thousand dollars ($5,000) for supplies or services and less than fifteen thousand dollars ($15,000) for construction. If these methods are not used, the other methods of source selection provided in 5 GCA §5210 (Methods of Source Selection) of the Guam Procurement Act and these Regulations shall apply. Condition: For 2 (or 17%) of 12 items tested, GMHA’s method of procurement did not comply with local procurement regulations. GMHA is considered an instrumentality of the Government of Guam which is included in the definition of a State within 2 CFR 200. Accordingly, as there exists policies and procedures for procurement, such policies and procedures should have been used in conducting procurement transactions under a federal award in accordance with 2 CFR 200.317. Cause: GMHA did not use the same policies and procedures used for procurement of non-federal funds in accordance with 2 CFR 200.317. Effect: GMHA is in noncompliance with the applicable requirement. Recommendation: GMHA should adopt and implement the same policies and procedures for federal funds as those used for non-federal funds in accordance with 2 CFR 200.317. Views of Responsible Officials: Management disagrees with the finding. Management concluded that procurement thresholds is not an aspect of policies and procedures required under 2 CFR 200.317. Management concluded that higher thresholds set in 2 CFR 200.320 Simplified Acquisition Threshold as the applicable requirement. Please refer to GMHA’s views of responsible officials for their detailed response.
Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 requires that the non-Federal entity must "(a) establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in "Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government" issued by the comptroller General of the United States and the "Internal Control Intergrated Framework", issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)." Uniform Guidance 2 CFR Section 200.320 (a)(2) states regarding the applicability of simplified acquisition procedures: "The aggregate dollar amount of the procurement transaction is higher than the micro purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If simplified acquisition procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. Unless specified by the Federal agency, the recipient or subrecipient may exercise judgment in determining what number is adequate." Per procurement policy of AIHEC requires that for procurement by small purchase ($10,000 - $249,000), where the aggregate dollar amount is higher than the micro-purchase threshold, price or rate quotations must be obtained from three qualified sources. If three separate qualified sources cannot be obtained the reason needs to be formally documented. Condition/Context For procurement transaction tested, we noted that AIHEC did not complete a sole-source justification form timely to support the vendor that was selected. Cause Management does not have sufficient internal controls in place to ensure that AIHEC's procurement policies are followed for all procurement transactions prior to entering the procurement. Effect AIHEC entered into a procurement that did not go through a competitive solicitation process. Recommendation Management should review its policies and procedures to ensure all procurement transactions are in accordance with AIHEC's procurement policies and have the appropriate supporting documentation.
Finding: 2024-006 Procurement Suspension and Debarment (Significant Deficiency) Information on the Federal Programs: ALN #21.027 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Criteria or Specific Requirement (including Statutory, Regulatory, or Other Citation): §200.318 (i) General procurement standards, states that the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include but are not necessarily limited to the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Furthermore: §200.320 (f) Methods of procurement to be followed, states that procurement by noncompetitive proposals is procurement through solicitation of a proposal from only one source and may be used only when certain requirements have been met. Additionally, §200.213 Reporting a determination that a non-Federal entity is not qualified for a Federal award states that non-Federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. These regulations restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. The non-Federal entity must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified, by (a) checking SAM Exclusions; (b) collecting a certification from that person; (c) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. Condition: During our audit, we noted that while DOL has formal procurement policies under §200.318(i) and §200.320(f), it did not provide sufficient records detailing the procurement history or justification for competitive and noncompetitive selections in our sample. Additionally, DOL lacks formal policies on suspension and debarment, and SAM exclusion screening documentation was not provided for the sampled contracts and vendors. Cause: DOL’s procedures did not provide for the formalization and retention of procurement records and vendor screenings consistent with the expectations outlined in 2 CFR 200. Effect or Potential Effect: Purchases of goods and services could be made above the prevailing market rates if the prescribed procurement procedures are not adhered to. Finally, DOL could inadvertently enter into a contractual relationship with an entity that is suspended, debarred or otherwise included on the US Federal sanction list. Questioned Costs: N/A Context: Our audit work in this area consisted of internal control testwork over a random sample of expenditures. We consider our samples to be representative of the respective populations, and thus, are statistically valid samples. Identification as a Repeat Finding, if Applicable: N/A Recommendation: We then recommend that DOL develop and adhere to formal policies (as applicable) related to § 200.318 (i) General procurement standards, §200.320 (f) Methods of procurement to be followed, as well as §200.213 Reporting a determination that a non-Federal entity is not qualified for a Federal award. All procurement actions and SAM exclusion screenings should be clearly documented in writing and maintained in the vendor or contractor files.
Finding 2024-007: Procurement Program Title: Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation Research Assistance Listing Number: 81.113 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Energy Direct Award Identifying Numbers: DE-NA003862, DE-NA004179, DE-NA0004177 Federal Award Year: Year ended September 30, 2024 Program Title: Export Control and Related Border Security Assistance Listing Number: 19.901 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of State Direct Award Identifying Number: SAQMIP23CA0153 Pass-Through Entity Name, Pass-Through Identifying Number: The Research Foundation for SUNY, University at Albany, 3-98939 Federal Award Year: Year ended September 30, 2024 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Material Noncompliance Criteria: According to 2 CFR §200.303, the non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non- Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the internal Control Integrated Framework, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Per CFR §200.318-§200.326, non-Federal entities must maintain written procurement procedures that comply with Federal standards, including thresholds, methods of procurement, and documentation requirements. Noncompetitive procurements can only be awarded in accordance with §200.320(c). According to 2 CFR §200.320 Procurement Standards, there are specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. Noncompetitive procurement can only be awarded if one or more of the following circumstances apply: 1. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold, 2. The item is available only from a single source; 3. The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from publicizing a competitive solicitation; 4. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity expressly authorizes a noncompetitive procurement in response to a written request from the non-Federal entity; or 5. After solicitation of a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate. Condition: We noted that PFI’s procurement policy does not contain a micropurchase threshold and its threshold for simplified acquisitions is not accurately defined in accordance with the applicable Uniform Guidance requirements. During our testing over procurement, we noted several instances where PFI did not clearly document the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Furthermore, there were instances where review and approval over procurement was evidenced but the reviewer was not included in PFI’s procurement policy list of authorized approvers. Cause: PFI’s procurement policy was out of date and had not been updated to align with the current version of the Uniform Guidance. Effect or Potential Effect: An outdated procurement policy increases the risk of noncompliance with Federal requirements, improper procurement practices, and potential disallowance of costs charged to Federal awards. Questioned Costs: $31,120 of known questioned costs were identified for 2 procurements under ALN 81.113. $15,000 of known questioned costs were identified for ALN 19.901 along with $806 of likely questioned costs based on projecting the known questioned costs to the remaining population of procurement transactions. Context: 2 of 2 samples selected for testing under ALN 81.113 and 1 out of 3 samples selected for testing under 19.901 did not have adequate documentation for the rationale related to the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. For 2 out of 2 samples under ALN 81.113 and 2 out of 3 samples under ALN 19.901, PFI had evidence of review and approval, but the reviewer was not on PFI’s authorized list included in its procurement policy. The samples are representative of the populations. Repeat Finding: Not applicable. Recommendation: We recommend that PFI revise its procurement policy to fully comply with the requirements in the latest version of the Uniform Guidance. In particular, the revised policy should include a micropurchase threshold, an accurate simplified acquisition threshold, and update the authorized list of reviewers for procurement transactions.
Finding No.: 2024-009 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education AL Program: 84.403 Consolidated Grant to the Outlying Area Area: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Questioned Costs: $6,918 Criteria: 2 CFR 200.319 states that: (a) All procurement transactions under the Federal award must be conducted in a manner that provides full and open competition and is consistent with the standards of this section and 2 CFR 200.320. (c) (6) Examples of situations that may restrict competition include specifying only a “brand name” product instead of allowing “an equal” product to be offered and describing the performance or other relevant requirements of the procurement. (d) (2) The recipient or subrecipient must have written procedures for procurement transactions. These procedures must ensure that all solicitations incorporate a clear and accurate description of the technical requirements for the property, equipment, or service being procured. The description may include a statement of the qualitative nature of the property, equipment, or service to be procured. When necessary, the description must provide minimum essential characteristics and standards to which the property, equipment, or service must conform. Detailed product specifications should be avoided if at all possible. When it is impractical or uneconomical to clearly and accurately describe the technical requirements, a “brand name or equivalent” description of features may be used to provide procurement requirements. The specific features of the named brand must be clearly stated. 2 CFR 200.324(a) states that recipient or subrecipient must perform a cost or price analysis for every procurement transaction, including contract modifications, in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold. Finding No.: 2024-009, continued Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education AL Program: 84.403 Consolidated Grant to the Outlying Area Area: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Questioned Costs: $6,918 Conditions: 1. Of thirty-nine items, aggregating $426,960 of $9,005,697 of expenditures subjected to procurement test, deficiencies were noted, as follows: a. For 1 item (or 3%), procurement did not provide full and open competition in the solicitation process. The request for quotation specified particular model, including a requirement for a specific “brand name” product instead of allowing “an equal” product to be offered. Item # Federal Award No. Purchase Order Expenditures Questioned Costs 1 S403A220002 20240435 $12,447 $6,918 2. GDOE does not have procurement policies that meet the requirements of 2 CFR 200.318(a) and 2 CFR 200.324(a). Specifically, GDOE lacks documented procedures to ensure compliance with procurement transactions under a Federal award or subaward, requiring the performance and retention of cost price analysis for procurement transactions above the simplified acquisition threshold. Cause: GDOE did not enforce monitoring controls over compliance with applicable procurement requirements. Also, GDOE lacks adequate internal controls over periodic review of procurement policies, specifically, ensuring all required key provisions from the Compliance Supplement are included in the procurement policies. Effect: GDOE is in noncompliance with applicable procurement and suspension and debarment requirements. The reportable questioned cost is $6,918. Also, we did not identify procurement of goods or services that would have required a cost price analysis. Finding No.: 2024-009, continued Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education AL Program: 84.403 Consolidated Grant to the Outlying Area Area: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Questioned Costs: $6,918 Recommendation: Responsible personnel should enforce monitoring controls over compliance with applicable procurement requirements. Also, GDOE should revisit its procurement policies and ensure all required provisions stated in the Compliance Supplement are covered.
Repeat finding 2023-001, 2022-001, and 2021-002 FAN 93.676 Unaccompanied Alien Children Program Child Nutrition Cluster Procurement and Suspension & Debarment Type of Finding: Non-Compliance U.S. Department of Health & Human Services U.S Department of Agriculture Criteria Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(b)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The requirements that apply to procurement under grants and cooperative agreements are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.326, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. The requirements for non-procurement suspension and debarment are contained in OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, “Debarment and Suspension;” federal awarding agency regulations in Title 2 of the CFR adopting/implementing the OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180; program legislation; and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition The Organization had no findings for contracts procured during the last three fiscal years that were detail tested. However, the Organization’s management recognizes that there are still active contracts under the federal programs for fiscal year ending August 31, 2024 that were procured over three fiscal years ago in which adherence to procurement policies, specifically documentation history of procurement, has not been maintained. In regards to progress made in reducing the number of vendors that are out of compliance, specifically vendors with over $50,000 of annual expenditures that were categorized as “legacy” vendors procured under the previous procurement policies, the Organization went from having 100 vendors totaling approximately $159 million in expenditures as of August 31, 2023, to 46 vendors totaling approximately $119 million as of August 31, 2024. This shows a decrease of 54% in the number of legacy vendors with a decrease of 25% in the dollar-value of the legacy vendors year over year. Further, the Organization continues to make progress in reducing legacy vendor non-compliance by reducing that number to 33 vendors totaling approximately $113 million as of January 2, 2025. As this has been a recurring finding in which management is actively getting all active contracts under the current procurement policies, only those current contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years were detail tested. Of the approximately 70 active vendor contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years that were wholly or partially funded with Unaccompanied Alien Children Program revenue dollars or with Child Nutrition Cluster Program revenue dollars, ten were tested with no errors noted. Cause The Organization is aware they are operating under contracts that were procured in previous years that may not have all the records maintained. Contracts procured within the last three years show compliance with federal requirements based on detailed testing. Reprocuring all of the legacy contracts at once would potentially cause disruptions in operations due to the products/services related those vendors playing an important role in the Organization’s day-to-day operations. As such, the Organization still has active contracts procured under the old policies that they are working on reprocuring as these contracts’ renewal dates arise, if not earlier. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization could potentially be under contract with vendors that are not the best value, not adequately qualified, potentially suspended or debarred, or otherwise not suitable for contract under federal procurement guidelines. No questioned costs were identified, as services/goods under these contracts that were previously tested were deemed to be allowable under the program, and no exceptions noted for allowable costs/activities for samples that included payment to those vendors in previous years or current year. Recommendation The Organization should continue to review all its “legacy” contracts that were procured under the previous procurement policies to determine if there is proper documentation maintained for compliance with applicable procurement guidelines. This includes systematically re-procuring any current contracts not in compliance as soon as feasible. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See corrective action plan.
Repeat finding 2023-001, 2022-001, and 2021-002 FAN 93.676 Unaccompanied Alien Children Program Child Nutrition Cluster Procurement and Suspension & Debarment Type of Finding: Non-Compliance U.S. Department of Health & Human Services U.S Department of Agriculture Criteria Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(b)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The requirements that apply to procurement under grants and cooperative agreements are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.326, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. The requirements for non-procurement suspension and debarment are contained in OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, “Debarment and Suspension;” federal awarding agency regulations in Title 2 of the CFR adopting/implementing the OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180; program legislation; and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition The Organization had no findings for contracts procured during the last three fiscal years that were detail tested. However, the Organization’s management recognizes that there are still active contracts under the federal programs for fiscal year ending August 31, 2024 that were procured over three fiscal years ago in which adherence to procurement policies, specifically documentation history of procurement, has not been maintained. In regards to progress made in reducing the number of vendors that are out of compliance, specifically vendors with over $50,000 of annual expenditures that were categorized as “legacy” vendors procured under the previous procurement policies, the Organization went from having 100 vendors totaling approximately $159 million in expenditures as of August 31, 2023, to 46 vendors totaling approximately $119 million as of August 31, 2024. This shows a decrease of 54% in the number of legacy vendors with a decrease of 25% in the dollar-value of the legacy vendors year over year. Further, the Organization continues to make progress in reducing legacy vendor non-compliance by reducing that number to 33 vendors totaling approximately $113 million as of January 2, 2025. As this has been a recurring finding in which management is actively getting all active contracts under the current procurement policies, only those current contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years were detail tested. Of the approximately 70 active vendor contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years that were wholly or partially funded with Unaccompanied Alien Children Program revenue dollars or with Child Nutrition Cluster Program revenue dollars, ten were tested with no errors noted. Cause The Organization is aware they are operating under contracts that were procured in previous years that may not have all the records maintained. Contracts procured within the last three years show compliance with federal requirements based on detailed testing. Reprocuring all of the legacy contracts at once would potentially cause disruptions in operations due to the products/services related those vendors playing an important role in the Organization’s day-to-day operations. As such, the Organization still has active contracts procured under the old policies that they are working on reprocuring as these contracts’ renewal dates arise, if not earlier. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization could potentially be under contract with vendors that are not the best value, not adequately qualified, potentially suspended or debarred, or otherwise not suitable for contract under federal procurement guidelines. No questioned costs were identified, as services/goods under these contracts that were previously tested were deemed to be allowable under the program, and no exceptions noted for allowable costs/activities for samples that included payment to those vendors in previous years or current year. Recommendation The Organization should continue to review all its “legacy” contracts that were procured under the previous procurement policies to determine if there is proper documentation maintained for compliance with applicable procurement guidelines. This includes systematically re-procuring any current contracts not in compliance as soon as feasible. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See corrective action plan.
Repeat finding 2023-001, 2022-001, and 2021-002 FAN 93.676 Unaccompanied Alien Children Program Child Nutrition Cluster Procurement and Suspension & Debarment Type of Finding: Non-Compliance U.S. Department of Health & Human Services U.S Department of Agriculture Criteria Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(b)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The requirements that apply to procurement under grants and cooperative agreements are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.326, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. The requirements for non-procurement suspension and debarment are contained in OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, “Debarment and Suspension;” federal awarding agency regulations in Title 2 of the CFR adopting/implementing the OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180; program legislation; and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition The Organization had no findings for contracts procured during the last three fiscal years that were detail tested. However, the Organization’s management recognizes that there are still active contracts under the federal programs for fiscal year ending August 31, 2024 that were procured over three fiscal years ago in which adherence to procurement policies, specifically documentation history of procurement, has not been maintained. In regards to progress made in reducing the number of vendors that are out of compliance, specifically vendors with over $50,000 of annual expenditures that were categorized as “legacy” vendors procured under the previous procurement policies, the Organization went from having 100 vendors totaling approximately $159 million in expenditures as of August 31, 2023, to 46 vendors totaling approximately $119 million as of August 31, 2024. This shows a decrease of 54% in the number of legacy vendors with a decrease of 25% in the dollar-value of the legacy vendors year over year. Further, the Organization continues to make progress in reducing legacy vendor non-compliance by reducing that number to 33 vendors totaling approximately $113 million as of January 2, 2025. As this has been a recurring finding in which management is actively getting all active contracts under the current procurement policies, only those current contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years were detail tested. Of the approximately 70 active vendor contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years that were wholly or partially funded with Unaccompanied Alien Children Program revenue dollars or with Child Nutrition Cluster Program revenue dollars, ten were tested with no errors noted. Cause The Organization is aware they are operating under contracts that were procured in previous years that may not have all the records maintained. Contracts procured within the last three years show compliance with federal requirements based on detailed testing. Reprocuring all of the legacy contracts at once would potentially cause disruptions in operations due to the products/services related those vendors playing an important role in the Organization’s day-to-day operations. As such, the Organization still has active contracts procured under the old policies that they are working on reprocuring as these contracts’ renewal dates arise, if not earlier. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization could potentially be under contract with vendors that are not the best value, not adequately qualified, potentially suspended or debarred, or otherwise not suitable for contract under federal procurement guidelines. No questioned costs were identified, as services/goods under these contracts that were previously tested were deemed to be allowable under the program, and no exceptions noted for allowable costs/activities for samples that included payment to those vendors in previous years or current year. Recommendation The Organization should continue to review all its “legacy” contracts that were procured under the previous procurement policies to determine if there is proper documentation maintained for compliance with applicable procurement guidelines. This includes systematically re-procuring any current contracts not in compliance as soon as feasible. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See corrective action plan.
Repeat finding 2023-001, 2022-001, and 2021-002 FAN 93.676 Unaccompanied Alien Children Program Child Nutrition Cluster Procurement and Suspension & Debarment Type of Finding: Non-Compliance U.S. Department of Health & Human Services U.S Department of Agriculture Criteria Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(b)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The requirements that apply to procurement under grants and cooperative agreements are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.326, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. The requirements for non-procurement suspension and debarment are contained in OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, “Debarment and Suspension;” federal awarding agency regulations in Title 2 of the CFR adopting/implementing the OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180; program legislation; and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition The Organization had no findings for contracts procured during the last three fiscal years that were detail tested. However, the Organization’s management recognizes that there are still active contracts under the federal programs for fiscal year ending August 31, 2024 that were procured over three fiscal years ago in which adherence to procurement policies, specifically documentation history of procurement, has not been maintained. In regards to progress made in reducing the number of vendors that are out of compliance, specifically vendors with over $50,000 of annual expenditures that were categorized as “legacy” vendors procured under the previous procurement policies, the Organization went from having 100 vendors totaling approximately $159 million in expenditures as of August 31, 2023, to 46 vendors totaling approximately $119 million as of August 31, 2024. This shows a decrease of 54% in the number of legacy vendors with a decrease of 25% in the dollar-value of the legacy vendors year over year. Further, the Organization continues to make progress in reducing legacy vendor non-compliance by reducing that number to 33 vendors totaling approximately $113 million as of January 2, 2025. As this has been a recurring finding in which management is actively getting all active contracts under the current procurement policies, only those current contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years were detail tested. Of the approximately 70 active vendor contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years that were wholly or partially funded with Unaccompanied Alien Children Program revenue dollars or with Child Nutrition Cluster Program revenue dollars, ten were tested with no errors noted. Cause The Organization is aware they are operating under contracts that were procured in previous years that may not have all the records maintained. Contracts procured within the last three years show compliance with federal requirements based on detailed testing. Reprocuring all of the legacy contracts at once would potentially cause disruptions in operations due to the products/services related those vendors playing an important role in the Organization’s day-to-day operations. As such, the Organization still has active contracts procured under the old policies that they are working on reprocuring as these contracts’ renewal dates arise, if not earlier. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization could potentially be under contract with vendors that are not the best value, not adequately qualified, potentially suspended or debarred, or otherwise not suitable for contract under federal procurement guidelines. No questioned costs were identified, as services/goods under these contracts that were previously tested were deemed to be allowable under the program, and no exceptions noted for allowable costs/activities for samples that included payment to those vendors in previous years or current year. Recommendation The Organization should continue to review all its “legacy” contracts that were procured under the previous procurement policies to determine if there is proper documentation maintained for compliance with applicable procurement guidelines. This includes systematically re-procuring any current contracts not in compliance as soon as feasible. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See corrective action plan.
Repeat finding 2023-001, 2022-001, and 2021-002 FAN 93.676 Unaccompanied Alien Children Program Child Nutrition Cluster Procurement and Suspension & Debarment Type of Finding: Non-Compliance U.S. Department of Health & Human Services U.S Department of Agriculture Criteria Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(b)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The requirements that apply to procurement under grants and cooperative agreements are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.326, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. The requirements for non-procurement suspension and debarment are contained in OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, “Debarment and Suspension;” federal awarding agency regulations in Title 2 of the CFR adopting/implementing the OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180; program legislation; and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition The Organization had no findings for contracts procured during the last three fiscal years that were detail tested. However, the Organization’s management recognizes that there are still active contracts under the federal programs for fiscal year ending August 31, 2024 that were procured over three fiscal years ago in which adherence to procurement policies, specifically documentation history of procurement, has not been maintained. In regards to progress made in reducing the number of vendors that are out of compliance, specifically vendors with over $50,000 of annual expenditures that were categorized as “legacy” vendors procured under the previous procurement policies, the Organization went from having 100 vendors totaling approximately $159 million in expenditures as of August 31, 2023, to 46 vendors totaling approximately $119 million as of August 31, 2024. This shows a decrease of 54% in the number of legacy vendors with a decrease of 25% in the dollar-value of the legacy vendors year over year. Further, the Organization continues to make progress in reducing legacy vendor non-compliance by reducing that number to 33 vendors totaling approximately $113 million as of January 2, 2025. As this has been a recurring finding in which management is actively getting all active contracts under the current procurement policies, only those current contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years were detail tested. Of the approximately 70 active vendor contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years that were wholly or partially funded with Unaccompanied Alien Children Program revenue dollars or with Child Nutrition Cluster Program revenue dollars, ten were tested with no errors noted. Cause The Organization is aware they are operating under contracts that were procured in previous years that may not have all the records maintained. Contracts procured within the last three years show compliance with federal requirements based on detailed testing. Reprocuring all of the legacy contracts at once would potentially cause disruptions in operations due to the products/services related those vendors playing an important role in the Organization’s day-to-day operations. As such, the Organization still has active contracts procured under the old policies that they are working on reprocuring as these contracts’ renewal dates arise, if not earlier. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization could potentially be under contract with vendors that are not the best value, not adequately qualified, potentially suspended or debarred, or otherwise not suitable for contract under federal procurement guidelines. No questioned costs were identified, as services/goods under these contracts that were previously tested were deemed to be allowable under the program, and no exceptions noted for allowable costs/activities for samples that included payment to those vendors in previous years or current year. Recommendation The Organization should continue to review all its “legacy” contracts that were procured under the previous procurement policies to determine if there is proper documentation maintained for compliance with applicable procurement guidelines. This includes systematically re-procuring any current contracts not in compliance as soon as feasible. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See corrective action plan.
Repeat finding 2023-001, 2022-001, and 2021-002 FAN 93.676 Unaccompanied Alien Children Program Child Nutrition Cluster Procurement and Suspension & Debarment Type of Finding: Non-Compliance U.S. Department of Health & Human Services U.S Department of Agriculture Criteria Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(b)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The requirements that apply to procurement under grants and cooperative agreements are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.326, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. The requirements for non-procurement suspension and debarment are contained in OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, “Debarment and Suspension;” federal awarding agency regulations in Title 2 of the CFR adopting/implementing the OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180; program legislation; and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition The Organization had no findings for contracts procured during the last three fiscal years that were detail tested. However, the Organization’s management recognizes that there are still active contracts under the federal programs for fiscal year ending August 31, 2024 that were procured over three fiscal years ago in which adherence to procurement policies, specifically documentation history of procurement, has not been maintained. In regards to progress made in reducing the number of vendors that are out of compliance, specifically vendors with over $50,000 of annual expenditures that were categorized as “legacy” vendors procured under the previous procurement policies, the Organization went from having 100 vendors totaling approximately $159 million in expenditures as of August 31, 2023, to 46 vendors totaling approximately $119 million as of August 31, 2024. This shows a decrease of 54% in the number of legacy vendors with a decrease of 25% in the dollar-value of the legacy vendors year over year. Further, the Organization continues to make progress in reducing legacy vendor non-compliance by reducing that number to 33 vendors totaling approximately $113 million as of January 2, 2025. As this has been a recurring finding in which management is actively getting all active contracts under the current procurement policies, only those current contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years were detail tested. Of the approximately 70 active vendor contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years that were wholly or partially funded with Unaccompanied Alien Children Program revenue dollars or with Child Nutrition Cluster Program revenue dollars, ten were tested with no errors noted. Cause The Organization is aware they are operating under contracts that were procured in previous years that may not have all the records maintained. Contracts procured within the last three years show compliance with federal requirements based on detailed testing. Reprocuring all of the legacy contracts at once would potentially cause disruptions in operations due to the products/services related those vendors playing an important role in the Organization’s day-to-day operations. As such, the Organization still has active contracts procured under the old policies that they are working on reprocuring as these contracts’ renewal dates arise, if not earlier. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization could potentially be under contract with vendors that are not the best value, not adequately qualified, potentially suspended or debarred, or otherwise not suitable for contract under federal procurement guidelines. No questioned costs were identified, as services/goods under these contracts that were previously tested were deemed to be allowable under the program, and no exceptions noted for allowable costs/activities for samples that included payment to those vendors in previous years or current year. Recommendation The Organization should continue to review all its “legacy” contracts that were procured under the previous procurement policies to determine if there is proper documentation maintained for compliance with applicable procurement guidelines. This includes systematically re-procuring any current contracts not in compliance as soon as feasible. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See corrective action plan.
Repeat finding 2023-001, 2022-001, and 2021-002 FAN 93.676 Unaccompanied Alien Children Program Child Nutrition Cluster Procurement and Suspension & Debarment Type of Finding: Non-Compliance U.S. Department of Health & Human Services U.S Department of Agriculture Criteria Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(b)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The requirements that apply to procurement under grants and cooperative agreements are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.326, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. The requirements for non-procurement suspension and debarment are contained in OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, “Debarment and Suspension;” federal awarding agency regulations in Title 2 of the CFR adopting/implementing the OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180; program legislation; and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition The Organization had no findings for contracts procured during the last three fiscal years that were detail tested. However, the Organization’s management recognizes that there are still active contracts under the federal programs for fiscal year ending August 31, 2024 that were procured over three fiscal years ago in which adherence to procurement policies, specifically documentation history of procurement, has not been maintained. In regards to progress made in reducing the number of vendors that are out of compliance, specifically vendors with over $50,000 of annual expenditures that were categorized as “legacy” vendors procured under the previous procurement policies, the Organization went from having 100 vendors totaling approximately $159 million in expenditures as of August 31, 2023, to 46 vendors totaling approximately $119 million as of August 31, 2024. This shows a decrease of 54% in the number of legacy vendors with a decrease of 25% in the dollar-value of the legacy vendors year over year. Further, the Organization continues to make progress in reducing legacy vendor non-compliance by reducing that number to 33 vendors totaling approximately $113 million as of January 2, 2025. As this has been a recurring finding in which management is actively getting all active contracts under the current procurement policies, only those current contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years were detail tested. Of the approximately 70 active vendor contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years that were wholly or partially funded with Unaccompanied Alien Children Program revenue dollars or with Child Nutrition Cluster Program revenue dollars, ten were tested with no errors noted. Cause The Organization is aware they are operating under contracts that were procured in previous years that may not have all the records maintained. Contracts procured within the last three years show compliance with federal requirements based on detailed testing. Reprocuring all of the legacy contracts at once would potentially cause disruptions in operations due to the products/services related those vendors playing an important role in the Organization’s day-to-day operations. As such, the Organization still has active contracts procured under the old policies that they are working on reprocuring as these contracts’ renewal dates arise, if not earlier. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization could potentially be under contract with vendors that are not the best value, not adequately qualified, potentially suspended or debarred, or otherwise not suitable for contract under federal procurement guidelines. No questioned costs were identified, as services/goods under these contracts that were previously tested were deemed to be allowable under the program, and no exceptions noted for allowable costs/activities for samples that included payment to those vendors in previous years or current year. Recommendation The Organization should continue to review all its “legacy” contracts that were procured under the previous procurement policies to determine if there is proper documentation maintained for compliance with applicable procurement guidelines. This includes systematically re-procuring any current contracts not in compliance as soon as feasible. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See corrective action plan.
Repeat finding 2023-001, 2022-001, and 2021-002 FAN 93.676 Unaccompanied Alien Children Program Child Nutrition Cluster Procurement and Suspension & Debarment Type of Finding: Non-Compliance U.S. Department of Health & Human Services U.S Department of Agriculture Criteria Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(b)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The requirements that apply to procurement under grants and cooperative agreements are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.326, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. The requirements for non-procurement suspension and debarment are contained in OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, “Debarment and Suspension;” federal awarding agency regulations in Title 2 of the CFR adopting/implementing the OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180; program legislation; and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition The Organization had no findings for contracts procured during the last three fiscal years that were detail tested. However, the Organization’s management recognizes that there are still active contracts under the federal programs for fiscal year ending August 31, 2024 that were procured over three fiscal years ago in which adherence to procurement policies, specifically documentation history of procurement, has not been maintained. In regards to progress made in reducing the number of vendors that are out of compliance, specifically vendors with over $50,000 of annual expenditures that were categorized as “legacy” vendors procured under the previous procurement policies, the Organization went from having 100 vendors totaling approximately $159 million in expenditures as of August 31, 2023, to 46 vendors totaling approximately $119 million as of August 31, 2024. This shows a decrease of 54% in the number of legacy vendors with a decrease of 25% in the dollar-value of the legacy vendors year over year. Further, the Organization continues to make progress in reducing legacy vendor non-compliance by reducing that number to 33 vendors totaling approximately $113 million as of January 2, 2025. As this has been a recurring finding in which management is actively getting all active contracts under the current procurement policies, only those current contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years were detail tested. Of the approximately 70 active vendor contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years that were wholly or partially funded with Unaccompanied Alien Children Program revenue dollars or with Child Nutrition Cluster Program revenue dollars, ten were tested with no errors noted. Cause The Organization is aware they are operating under contracts that were procured in previous years that may not have all the records maintained. Contracts procured within the last three years show compliance with federal requirements based on detailed testing. Reprocuring all of the legacy contracts at once would potentially cause disruptions in operations due to the products/services related those vendors playing an important role in the Organization’s day-to-day operations. As such, the Organization still has active contracts procured under the old policies that they are working on reprocuring as these contracts’ renewal dates arise, if not earlier. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization could potentially be under contract with vendors that are not the best value, not adequately qualified, potentially suspended or debarred, or otherwise not suitable for contract under federal procurement guidelines. No questioned costs were identified, as services/goods under these contracts that were previously tested were deemed to be allowable under the program, and no exceptions noted for allowable costs/activities for samples that included payment to those vendors in previous years or current year. Recommendation The Organization should continue to review all its “legacy” contracts that were procured under the previous procurement policies to determine if there is proper documentation maintained for compliance with applicable procurement guidelines. This includes systematically re-procuring any current contracts not in compliance as soon as feasible. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See corrective action plan.
Repeat finding 2023-001, 2022-001, and 2021-002 FAN 93.676 Unaccompanied Alien Children Program Child Nutrition Cluster Procurement and Suspension & Debarment Type of Finding: Non-Compliance U.S. Department of Health & Human Services U.S Department of Agriculture Criteria Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(b)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The requirements that apply to procurement under grants and cooperative agreements are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.326, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. The requirements for non-procurement suspension and debarment are contained in OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, “Debarment and Suspension;” federal awarding agency regulations in Title 2 of the CFR adopting/implementing the OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180; program legislation; and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition The Organization had no findings for contracts procured during the last three fiscal years that were detail tested. However, the Organization’s management recognizes that there are still active contracts under the federal programs for fiscal year ending August 31, 2024 that were procured over three fiscal years ago in which adherence to procurement policies, specifically documentation history of procurement, has not been maintained. In regards to progress made in reducing the number of vendors that are out of compliance, specifically vendors with over $50,000 of annual expenditures that were categorized as “legacy” vendors procured under the previous procurement policies, the Organization went from having 100 vendors totaling approximately $159 million in expenditures as of August 31, 2023, to 46 vendors totaling approximately $119 million as of August 31, 2024. This shows a decrease of 54% in the number of legacy vendors with a decrease of 25% in the dollar-value of the legacy vendors year over year. Further, the Organization continues to make progress in reducing legacy vendor non-compliance by reducing that number to 33 vendors totaling approximately $113 million as of January 2, 2025. As this has been a recurring finding in which management is actively getting all active contracts under the current procurement policies, only those current contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years were detail tested. Of the approximately 70 active vendor contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years that were wholly or partially funded with Unaccompanied Alien Children Program revenue dollars or with Child Nutrition Cluster Program revenue dollars, ten were tested with no errors noted. Cause The Organization is aware they are operating under contracts that were procured in previous years that may not have all the records maintained. Contracts procured within the last three years show compliance with federal requirements based on detailed testing. Reprocuring all of the legacy contracts at once would potentially cause disruptions in operations due to the products/services related those vendors playing an important role in the Organization’s day-to-day operations. As such, the Organization still has active contracts procured under the old policies that they are working on reprocuring as these contracts’ renewal dates arise, if not earlier. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization could potentially be under contract with vendors that are not the best value, not adequately qualified, potentially suspended or debarred, or otherwise not suitable for contract under federal procurement guidelines. No questioned costs were identified, as services/goods under these contracts that were previously tested were deemed to be allowable under the program, and no exceptions noted for allowable costs/activities for samples that included payment to those vendors in previous years or current year. Recommendation The Organization should continue to review all its “legacy” contracts that were procured under the previous procurement policies to determine if there is proper documentation maintained for compliance with applicable procurement guidelines. This includes systematically re-procuring any current contracts not in compliance as soon as feasible. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See corrective action plan.
Repeat finding 2023-001, 2022-001, and 2021-002 FAN 93.676 Unaccompanied Alien Children Program Child Nutrition Cluster Procurement and Suspension & Debarment Type of Finding: Non-Compliance U.S. Department of Health & Human Services U.S Department of Agriculture Criteria Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(b)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The requirements that apply to procurement under grants and cooperative agreements are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.326, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. The requirements for non-procurement suspension and debarment are contained in OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, “Debarment and Suspension;” federal awarding agency regulations in Title 2 of the CFR adopting/implementing the OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180; program legislation; and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition The Organization had no findings for contracts procured during the last three fiscal years that were detail tested. However, the Organization’s management recognizes that there are still active contracts under the federal programs for fiscal year ending August 31, 2024 that were procured over three fiscal years ago in which adherence to procurement policies, specifically documentation history of procurement, has not been maintained. In regards to progress made in reducing the number of vendors that are out of compliance, specifically vendors with over $50,000 of annual expenditures that were categorized as “legacy” vendors procured under the previous procurement policies, the Organization went from having 100 vendors totaling approximately $159 million in expenditures as of August 31, 2023, to 46 vendors totaling approximately $119 million as of August 31, 2024. This shows a decrease of 54% in the number of legacy vendors with a decrease of 25% in the dollar-value of the legacy vendors year over year. Further, the Organization continues to make progress in reducing legacy vendor non-compliance by reducing that number to 33 vendors totaling approximately $113 million as of January 2, 2025. As this has been a recurring finding in which management is actively getting all active contracts under the current procurement policies, only those current contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years were detail tested. Of the approximately 70 active vendor contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years that were wholly or partially funded with Unaccompanied Alien Children Program revenue dollars or with Child Nutrition Cluster Program revenue dollars, ten were tested with no errors noted. Cause The Organization is aware they are operating under contracts that were procured in previous years that may not have all the records maintained. Contracts procured within the last three years show compliance with federal requirements based on detailed testing. Reprocuring all of the legacy contracts at once would potentially cause disruptions in operations due to the products/services related those vendors playing an important role in the Organization’s day-to-day operations. As such, the Organization still has active contracts procured under the old policies that they are working on reprocuring as these contracts’ renewal dates arise, if not earlier. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization could potentially be under contract with vendors that are not the best value, not adequately qualified, potentially suspended or debarred, or otherwise not suitable for contract under federal procurement guidelines. No questioned costs were identified, as services/goods under these contracts that were previously tested were deemed to be allowable under the program, and no exceptions noted for allowable costs/activities for samples that included payment to those vendors in previous years or current year. Recommendation The Organization should continue to review all its “legacy” contracts that were procured under the previous procurement policies to determine if there is proper documentation maintained for compliance with applicable procurement guidelines. This includes systematically re-procuring any current contracts not in compliance as soon as feasible. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See corrective action plan.
Repeat finding 2023-001, 2022-001, and 2021-002 FAN 93.676 Unaccompanied Alien Children Program Child Nutrition Cluster Procurement and Suspension & Debarment Type of Finding: Non-Compliance U.S. Department of Health & Human Services U.S Department of Agriculture Criteria Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(b)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The requirements that apply to procurement under grants and cooperative agreements are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.326, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. The requirements for non-procurement suspension and debarment are contained in OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, “Debarment and Suspension;” federal awarding agency regulations in Title 2 of the CFR adopting/implementing the OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180; program legislation; and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition The Organization had no findings for contracts procured during the last three fiscal years that were detail tested. However, the Organization’s management recognizes that there are still active contracts under the federal programs for fiscal year ending August 31, 2024 that were procured over three fiscal years ago in which adherence to procurement policies, specifically documentation history of procurement, has not been maintained. In regards to progress made in reducing the number of vendors that are out of compliance, specifically vendors with over $50,000 of annual expenditures that were categorized as “legacy” vendors procured under the previous procurement policies, the Organization went from having 100 vendors totaling approximately $159 million in expenditures as of August 31, 2023, to 46 vendors totaling approximately $119 million as of August 31, 2024. This shows a decrease of 54% in the number of legacy vendors with a decrease of 25% in the dollar-value of the legacy vendors year over year. Further, the Organization continues to make progress in reducing legacy vendor non-compliance by reducing that number to 33 vendors totaling approximately $113 million as of January 2, 2025. As this has been a recurring finding in which management is actively getting all active contracts under the current procurement policies, only those current contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years were detail tested. Of the approximately 70 active vendor contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years that were wholly or partially funded with Unaccompanied Alien Children Program revenue dollars or with Child Nutrition Cluster Program revenue dollars, ten were tested with no errors noted. Cause The Organization is aware they are operating under contracts that were procured in previous years that may not have all the records maintained. Contracts procured within the last three years show compliance with federal requirements based on detailed testing. Reprocuring all of the legacy contracts at once would potentially cause disruptions in operations due to the products/services related those vendors playing an important role in the Organization’s day-to-day operations. As such, the Organization still has active contracts procured under the old policies that they are working on reprocuring as these contracts’ renewal dates arise, if not earlier. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization could potentially be under contract with vendors that are not the best value, not adequately qualified, potentially suspended or debarred, or otherwise not suitable for contract under federal procurement guidelines. No questioned costs were identified, as services/goods under these contracts that were previously tested were deemed to be allowable under the program, and no exceptions noted for allowable costs/activities for samples that included payment to those vendors in previous years or current year. Recommendation The Organization should continue to review all its “legacy” contracts that were procured under the previous procurement policies to determine if there is proper documentation maintained for compliance with applicable procurement guidelines. This includes systematically re-procuring any current contracts not in compliance as soon as feasible. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See corrective action plan.
Repeat finding 2023-001, 2022-001, and 2021-002 FAN 93.676 Unaccompanied Alien Children Program Child Nutrition Cluster Procurement and Suspension & Debarment Type of Finding: Non-Compliance U.S. Department of Health & Human Services U.S Department of Agriculture Criteria Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(b)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The requirements that apply to procurement under grants and cooperative agreements are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.326, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. The requirements for non-procurement suspension and debarment are contained in OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, “Debarment and Suspension;” federal awarding agency regulations in Title 2 of the CFR adopting/implementing the OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180; program legislation; and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition The Organization had no findings for contracts procured during the last three fiscal years that were detail tested. However, the Organization’s management recognizes that there are still active contracts under the federal programs for fiscal year ending August 31, 2024 that were procured over three fiscal years ago in which adherence to procurement policies, specifically documentation history of procurement, has not been maintained. In regards to progress made in reducing the number of vendors that are out of compliance, specifically vendors with over $50,000 of annual expenditures that were categorized as “legacy” vendors procured under the previous procurement policies, the Organization went from having 100 vendors totaling approximately $159 million in expenditures as of August 31, 2023, to 46 vendors totaling approximately $119 million as of August 31, 2024. This shows a decrease of 54% in the number of legacy vendors with a decrease of 25% in the dollar-value of the legacy vendors year over year. Further, the Organization continues to make progress in reducing legacy vendor non-compliance by reducing that number to 33 vendors totaling approximately $113 million as of January 2, 2025. As this has been a recurring finding in which management is actively getting all active contracts under the current procurement policies, only those current contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years were detail tested. Of the approximately 70 active vendor contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years that were wholly or partially funded with Unaccompanied Alien Children Program revenue dollars or with Child Nutrition Cluster Program revenue dollars, ten were tested with no errors noted. Cause The Organization is aware they are operating under contracts that were procured in previous years that may not have all the records maintained. Contracts procured within the last three years show compliance with federal requirements based on detailed testing. Reprocuring all of the legacy contracts at once would potentially cause disruptions in operations due to the products/services related those vendors playing an important role in the Organization’s day-to-day operations. As such, the Organization still has active contracts procured under the old policies that they are working on reprocuring as these contracts’ renewal dates arise, if not earlier. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization could potentially be under contract with vendors that are not the best value, not adequately qualified, potentially suspended or debarred, or otherwise not suitable for contract under federal procurement guidelines. No questioned costs were identified, as services/goods under these contracts that were previously tested were deemed to be allowable under the program, and no exceptions noted for allowable costs/activities for samples that included payment to those vendors in previous years or current year. Recommendation The Organization should continue to review all its “legacy” contracts that were procured under the previous procurement policies to determine if there is proper documentation maintained for compliance with applicable procurement guidelines. This includes systematically re-procuring any current contracts not in compliance as soon as feasible. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See corrective action plan.
Repeat finding 2023-001, 2022-001, and 2021-002 FAN 93.676 Unaccompanied Alien Children Program Child Nutrition Cluster Procurement and Suspension & Debarment Type of Finding: Non-Compliance U.S. Department of Health & Human Services U.S Department of Agriculture Criteria Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(b)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The requirements that apply to procurement under grants and cooperative agreements are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.326, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. The requirements for non-procurement suspension and debarment are contained in OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, “Debarment and Suspension;” federal awarding agency regulations in Title 2 of the CFR adopting/implementing the OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180; program legislation; and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition The Organization had no findings for contracts procured during the last three fiscal years that were detail tested. However, the Organization’s management recognizes that there are still active contracts under the federal programs for fiscal year ending August 31, 2024 that were procured over three fiscal years ago in which adherence to procurement policies, specifically documentation history of procurement, has not been maintained. In regards to progress made in reducing the number of vendors that are out of compliance, specifically vendors with over $50,000 of annual expenditures that were categorized as “legacy” vendors procured under the previous procurement policies, the Organization went from having 100 vendors totaling approximately $159 million in expenditures as of August 31, 2023, to 46 vendors totaling approximately $119 million as of August 31, 2024. This shows a decrease of 54% in the number of legacy vendors with a decrease of 25% in the dollar-value of the legacy vendors year over year. Further, the Organization continues to make progress in reducing legacy vendor non-compliance by reducing that number to 33 vendors totaling approximately $113 million as of January 2, 2025. As this has been a recurring finding in which management is actively getting all active contracts under the current procurement policies, only those current contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years were detail tested. Of the approximately 70 active vendor contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years that were wholly or partially funded with Unaccompanied Alien Children Program revenue dollars or with Child Nutrition Cluster Program revenue dollars, ten were tested with no errors noted. Cause The Organization is aware they are operating under contracts that were procured in previous years that may not have all the records maintained. Contracts procured within the last three years show compliance with federal requirements based on detailed testing. Reprocuring all of the legacy contracts at once would potentially cause disruptions in operations due to the products/services related those vendors playing an important role in the Organization’s day-to-day operations. As such, the Organization still has active contracts procured under the old policies that they are working on reprocuring as these contracts’ renewal dates arise, if not earlier. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization could potentially be under contract with vendors that are not the best value, not adequately qualified, potentially suspended or debarred, or otherwise not suitable for contract under federal procurement guidelines. No questioned costs were identified, as services/goods under these contracts that were previously tested were deemed to be allowable under the program, and no exceptions noted for allowable costs/activities for samples that included payment to those vendors in previous years or current year. Recommendation The Organization should continue to review all its “legacy” contracts that were procured under the previous procurement policies to determine if there is proper documentation maintained for compliance with applicable procurement guidelines. This includes systematically re-procuring any current contracts not in compliance as soon as feasible. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See corrective action plan.
Repeat finding 2023-001, 2022-001, and 2021-002 FAN 93.676 Unaccompanied Alien Children Program Child Nutrition Cluster Procurement and Suspension & Debarment Type of Finding: Non-Compliance U.S. Department of Health & Human Services U.S Department of Agriculture Criteria Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(b)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The requirements that apply to procurement under grants and cooperative agreements are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.326, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. The requirements for non-procurement suspension and debarment are contained in OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, “Debarment and Suspension;” federal awarding agency regulations in Title 2 of the CFR adopting/implementing the OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180; program legislation; and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition The Organization had no findings for contracts procured during the last three fiscal years that were detail tested. However, the Organization’s management recognizes that there are still active contracts under the federal programs for fiscal year ending August 31, 2024 that were procured over three fiscal years ago in which adherence to procurement policies, specifically documentation history of procurement, has not been maintained. In regards to progress made in reducing the number of vendors that are out of compliance, specifically vendors with over $50,000 of annual expenditures that were categorized as “legacy” vendors procured under the previous procurement policies, the Organization went from having 100 vendors totaling approximately $159 million in expenditures as of August 31, 2023, to 46 vendors totaling approximately $119 million as of August 31, 2024. This shows a decrease of 54% in the number of legacy vendors with a decrease of 25% in the dollar-value of the legacy vendors year over year. Further, the Organization continues to make progress in reducing legacy vendor non-compliance by reducing that number to 33 vendors totaling approximately $113 million as of January 2, 2025. As this has been a recurring finding in which management is actively getting all active contracts under the current procurement policies, only those current contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years were detail tested. Of the approximately 70 active vendor contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years that were wholly or partially funded with Unaccompanied Alien Children Program revenue dollars or with Child Nutrition Cluster Program revenue dollars, ten were tested with no errors noted. Cause The Organization is aware they are operating under contracts that were procured in previous years that may not have all the records maintained. Contracts procured within the last three years show compliance with federal requirements based on detailed testing. Reprocuring all of the legacy contracts at once would potentially cause disruptions in operations due to the products/services related those vendors playing an important role in the Organization’s day-to-day operations. As such, the Organization still has active contracts procured under the old policies that they are working on reprocuring as these contracts’ renewal dates arise, if not earlier. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization could potentially be under contract with vendors that are not the best value, not adequately qualified, potentially suspended or debarred, or otherwise not suitable for contract under federal procurement guidelines. No questioned costs were identified, as services/goods under these contracts that were previously tested were deemed to be allowable under the program, and no exceptions noted for allowable costs/activities for samples that included payment to those vendors in previous years or current year. Recommendation The Organization should continue to review all its “legacy” contracts that were procured under the previous procurement policies to determine if there is proper documentation maintained for compliance with applicable procurement guidelines. This includes systematically re-procuring any current contracts not in compliance as soon as feasible. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See corrective action plan.
Repeat finding 2023-001, 2022-001, and 2021-002 FAN 93.676 Unaccompanied Alien Children Program Child Nutrition Cluster Procurement and Suspension & Debarment Type of Finding: Non-Compliance U.S. Department of Health & Human Services U.S Department of Agriculture Criteria Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(b)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The requirements that apply to procurement under grants and cooperative agreements are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.326, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. The requirements for non-procurement suspension and debarment are contained in OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, “Debarment and Suspension;” federal awarding agency regulations in Title 2 of the CFR adopting/implementing the OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180; program legislation; and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition The Organization had no findings for contracts procured during the last three fiscal years that were detail tested. However, the Organization’s management recognizes that there are still active contracts under the federal programs for fiscal year ending August 31, 2024 that were procured over three fiscal years ago in which adherence to procurement policies, specifically documentation history of procurement, has not been maintained. In regards to progress made in reducing the number of vendors that are out of compliance, specifically vendors with over $50,000 of annual expenditures that were categorized as “legacy” vendors procured under the previous procurement policies, the Organization went from having 100 vendors totaling approximately $159 million in expenditures as of August 31, 2023, to 46 vendors totaling approximately $119 million as of August 31, 2024. This shows a decrease of 54% in the number of legacy vendors with a decrease of 25% in the dollar-value of the legacy vendors year over year. Further, the Organization continues to make progress in reducing legacy vendor non-compliance by reducing that number to 33 vendors totaling approximately $113 million as of January 2, 2025. As this has been a recurring finding in which management is actively getting all active contracts under the current procurement policies, only those current contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years were detail tested. Of the approximately 70 active vendor contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years that were wholly or partially funded with Unaccompanied Alien Children Program revenue dollars or with Child Nutrition Cluster Program revenue dollars, ten were tested with no errors noted. Cause The Organization is aware they are operating under contracts that were procured in previous years that may not have all the records maintained. Contracts procured within the last three years show compliance with federal requirements based on detailed testing. Reprocuring all of the legacy contracts at once would potentially cause disruptions in operations due to the products/services related those vendors playing an important role in the Organization’s day-to-day operations. As such, the Organization still has active contracts procured under the old policies that they are working on reprocuring as these contracts’ renewal dates arise, if not earlier. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization could potentially be under contract with vendors that are not the best value, not adequately qualified, potentially suspended or debarred, or otherwise not suitable for contract under federal procurement guidelines. No questioned costs were identified, as services/goods under these contracts that were previously tested were deemed to be allowable under the program, and no exceptions noted for allowable costs/activities for samples that included payment to those vendors in previous years or current year. Recommendation The Organization should continue to review all its “legacy” contracts that were procured under the previous procurement policies to determine if there is proper documentation maintained for compliance with applicable procurement guidelines. This includes systematically re-procuring any current contracts not in compliance as soon as feasible. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See corrective action plan.
Repeat finding 2023-001, 2022-001, and 2021-002 FAN 93.676 Unaccompanied Alien Children Program Child Nutrition Cluster Procurement and Suspension & Debarment Type of Finding: Non-Compliance U.S. Department of Health & Human Services U.S Department of Agriculture Criteria Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(b)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The requirements that apply to procurement under grants and cooperative agreements are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.326, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. The requirements for non-procurement suspension and debarment are contained in OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, “Debarment and Suspension;” federal awarding agency regulations in Title 2 of the CFR adopting/implementing the OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180; program legislation; and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition The Organization had no findings for contracts procured during the last three fiscal years that were detail tested. However, the Organization’s management recognizes that there are still active contracts under the federal programs for fiscal year ending August 31, 2024 that were procured over three fiscal years ago in which adherence to procurement policies, specifically documentation history of procurement, has not been maintained. In regards to progress made in reducing the number of vendors that are out of compliance, specifically vendors with over $50,000 of annual expenditures that were categorized as “legacy” vendors procured under the previous procurement policies, the Organization went from having 100 vendors totaling approximately $159 million in expenditures as of August 31, 2023, to 46 vendors totaling approximately $119 million as of August 31, 2024. This shows a decrease of 54% in the number of legacy vendors with a decrease of 25% in the dollar-value of the legacy vendors year over year. Further, the Organization continues to make progress in reducing legacy vendor non-compliance by reducing that number to 33 vendors totaling approximately $113 million as of January 2, 2025. As this has been a recurring finding in which management is actively getting all active contracts under the current procurement policies, only those current contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years were detail tested. Of the approximately 70 active vendor contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years that were wholly or partially funded with Unaccompanied Alien Children Program revenue dollars or with Child Nutrition Cluster Program revenue dollars, ten were tested with no errors noted. Cause The Organization is aware they are operating under contracts that were procured in previous years that may not have all the records maintained. Contracts procured within the last three years show compliance with federal requirements based on detailed testing. Reprocuring all of the legacy contracts at once would potentially cause disruptions in operations due to the products/services related those vendors playing an important role in the Organization’s day-to-day operations. As such, the Organization still has active contracts procured under the old policies that they are working on reprocuring as these contracts’ renewal dates arise, if not earlier. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization could potentially be under contract with vendors that are not the best value, not adequately qualified, potentially suspended or debarred, or otherwise not suitable for contract under federal procurement guidelines. No questioned costs were identified, as services/goods under these contracts that were previously tested were deemed to be allowable under the program, and no exceptions noted for allowable costs/activities for samples that included payment to those vendors in previous years or current year. Recommendation The Organization should continue to review all its “legacy” contracts that were procured under the previous procurement policies to determine if there is proper documentation maintained for compliance with applicable procurement guidelines. This includes systematically re-procuring any current contracts not in compliance as soon as feasible. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See corrective action plan.
Repeat finding 2023-001, 2022-001, and 2021-002 FAN 93.676 Unaccompanied Alien Children Program Child Nutrition Cluster Procurement and Suspension & Debarment Type of Finding: Non-Compliance U.S. Department of Health & Human Services U.S Department of Agriculture Criteria Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(b)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The requirements that apply to procurement under grants and cooperative agreements are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.326, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. The requirements for non-procurement suspension and debarment are contained in OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, “Debarment and Suspension;” federal awarding agency regulations in Title 2 of the CFR adopting/implementing the OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180; program legislation; and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition The Organization had no findings for contracts procured during the last three fiscal years that were detail tested. However, the Organization’s management recognizes that there are still active contracts under the federal programs for fiscal year ending August 31, 2024 that were procured over three fiscal years ago in which adherence to procurement policies, specifically documentation history of procurement, has not been maintained. In regards to progress made in reducing the number of vendors that are out of compliance, specifically vendors with over $50,000 of annual expenditures that were categorized as “legacy” vendors procured under the previous procurement policies, the Organization went from having 100 vendors totaling approximately $159 million in expenditures as of August 31, 2023, to 46 vendors totaling approximately $119 million as of August 31, 2024. This shows a decrease of 54% in the number of legacy vendors with a decrease of 25% in the dollar-value of the legacy vendors year over year. Further, the Organization continues to make progress in reducing legacy vendor non-compliance by reducing that number to 33 vendors totaling approximately $113 million as of January 2, 2025. As this has been a recurring finding in which management is actively getting all active contracts under the current procurement policies, only those current contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years were detail tested. Of the approximately 70 active vendor contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years that were wholly or partially funded with Unaccompanied Alien Children Program revenue dollars or with Child Nutrition Cluster Program revenue dollars, ten were tested with no errors noted. Cause The Organization is aware they are operating under contracts that were procured in previous years that may not have all the records maintained. Contracts procured within the last three years show compliance with federal requirements based on detailed testing. Reprocuring all of the legacy contracts at once would potentially cause disruptions in operations due to the products/services related those vendors playing an important role in the Organization’s day-to-day operations. As such, the Organization still has active contracts procured under the old policies that they are working on reprocuring as these contracts’ renewal dates arise, if not earlier. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization could potentially be under contract with vendors that are not the best value, not adequately qualified, potentially suspended or debarred, or otherwise not suitable for contract under federal procurement guidelines. No questioned costs were identified, as services/goods under these contracts that were previously tested were deemed to be allowable under the program, and no exceptions noted for allowable costs/activities for samples that included payment to those vendors in previous years or current year. Recommendation The Organization should continue to review all its “legacy” contracts that were procured under the previous procurement policies to determine if there is proper documentation maintained for compliance with applicable procurement guidelines. This includes systematically re-procuring any current contracts not in compliance as soon as feasible. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See corrective action plan.
Repeat finding 2023-001, 2022-001, and 2021-002 FAN 93.676 Unaccompanied Alien Children Program Child Nutrition Cluster Procurement and Suspension & Debarment Type of Finding: Non-Compliance U.S. Department of Health & Human Services U.S Department of Agriculture Criteria Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(b)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The requirements that apply to procurement under grants and cooperative agreements are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.326, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. The requirements for non-procurement suspension and debarment are contained in OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, “Debarment and Suspension;” federal awarding agency regulations in Title 2 of the CFR adopting/implementing the OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180; program legislation; and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition The Organization had no findings for contracts procured during the last three fiscal years that were detail tested. However, the Organization’s management recognizes that there are still active contracts under the federal programs for fiscal year ending August 31, 2024 that were procured over three fiscal years ago in which adherence to procurement policies, specifically documentation history of procurement, has not been maintained. In regards to progress made in reducing the number of vendors that are out of compliance, specifically vendors with over $50,000 of annual expenditures that were categorized as “legacy” vendors procured under the previous procurement policies, the Organization went from having 100 vendors totaling approximately $159 million in expenditures as of August 31, 2023, to 46 vendors totaling approximately $119 million as of August 31, 2024. This shows a decrease of 54% in the number of legacy vendors with a decrease of 25% in the dollar-value of the legacy vendors year over year. Further, the Organization continues to make progress in reducing legacy vendor non-compliance by reducing that number to 33 vendors totaling approximately $113 million as of January 2, 2025. As this has been a recurring finding in which management is actively getting all active contracts under the current procurement policies, only those current contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years were detail tested. Of the approximately 70 active vendor contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years that were wholly or partially funded with Unaccompanied Alien Children Program revenue dollars or with Child Nutrition Cluster Program revenue dollars, ten were tested with no errors noted. Cause The Organization is aware they are operating under contracts that were procured in previous years that may not have all the records maintained. Contracts procured within the last three years show compliance with federal requirements based on detailed testing. Reprocuring all of the legacy contracts at once would potentially cause disruptions in operations due to the products/services related those vendors playing an important role in the Organization’s day-to-day operations. As such, the Organization still has active contracts procured under the old policies that they are working on reprocuring as these contracts’ renewal dates arise, if not earlier. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization could potentially be under contract with vendors that are not the best value, not adequately qualified, potentially suspended or debarred, or otherwise not suitable for contract under federal procurement guidelines. No questioned costs were identified, as services/goods under these contracts that were previously tested were deemed to be allowable under the program, and no exceptions noted for allowable costs/activities for samples that included payment to those vendors in previous years or current year. Recommendation The Organization should continue to review all its “legacy” contracts that were procured under the previous procurement policies to determine if there is proper documentation maintained for compliance with applicable procurement guidelines. This includes systematically re-procuring any current contracts not in compliance as soon as feasible. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See corrective action plan.
Repeat finding 2023-001, 2022-001, and 2021-002 FAN 93.676 Unaccompanied Alien Children Program Child Nutrition Cluster Procurement and Suspension & Debarment Type of Finding: Non-Compliance U.S. Department of Health & Human Services U.S Department of Agriculture Criteria Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(b)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The requirements that apply to procurement under grants and cooperative agreements are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.326, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. The requirements for non-procurement suspension and debarment are contained in OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, “Debarment and Suspension;” federal awarding agency regulations in Title 2 of the CFR adopting/implementing the OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180; program legislation; and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition The Organization had no findings for contracts procured during the last three fiscal years that were detail tested. However, the Organization’s management recognizes that there are still active contracts under the federal programs for fiscal year ending August 31, 2024 that were procured over three fiscal years ago in which adherence to procurement policies, specifically documentation history of procurement, has not been maintained. In regards to progress made in reducing the number of vendors that are out of compliance, specifically vendors with over $50,000 of annual expenditures that were categorized as “legacy” vendors procured under the previous procurement policies, the Organization went from having 100 vendors totaling approximately $159 million in expenditures as of August 31, 2023, to 46 vendors totaling approximately $119 million as of August 31, 2024. This shows a decrease of 54% in the number of legacy vendors with a decrease of 25% in the dollar-value of the legacy vendors year over year. Further, the Organization continues to make progress in reducing legacy vendor non-compliance by reducing that number to 33 vendors totaling approximately $113 million as of January 2, 2025. As this has been a recurring finding in which management is actively getting all active contracts under the current procurement policies, only those current contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years were detail tested. Of the approximately 70 active vendor contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years that were wholly or partially funded with Unaccompanied Alien Children Program revenue dollars or with Child Nutrition Cluster Program revenue dollars, ten were tested with no errors noted. Cause The Organization is aware they are operating under contracts that were procured in previous years that may not have all the records maintained. Contracts procured within the last three years show compliance with federal requirements based on detailed testing. Reprocuring all of the legacy contracts at once would potentially cause disruptions in operations due to the products/services related those vendors playing an important role in the Organization’s day-to-day operations. As such, the Organization still has active contracts procured under the old policies that they are working on reprocuring as these contracts’ renewal dates arise, if not earlier. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization could potentially be under contract with vendors that are not the best value, not adequately qualified, potentially suspended or debarred, or otherwise not suitable for contract under federal procurement guidelines. No questioned costs were identified, as services/goods under these contracts that were previously tested were deemed to be allowable under the program, and no exceptions noted for allowable costs/activities for samples that included payment to those vendors in previous years or current year. Recommendation The Organization should continue to review all its “legacy” contracts that were procured under the previous procurement policies to determine if there is proper documentation maintained for compliance with applicable procurement guidelines. This includes systematically re-procuring any current contracts not in compliance as soon as feasible. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See corrective action plan.
Repeat finding 2023-001, 2022-001, and 2021-002 FAN 93.676 Unaccompanied Alien Children Program Child Nutrition Cluster Procurement and Suspension & Debarment Type of Finding: Non-Compliance U.S. Department of Health & Human Services U.S Department of Agriculture Criteria Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(b)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The requirements that apply to procurement under grants and cooperative agreements are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.326, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. The requirements for non-procurement suspension and debarment are contained in OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, “Debarment and Suspension;” federal awarding agency regulations in Title 2 of the CFR adopting/implementing the OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180; program legislation; and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition The Organization had no findings for contracts procured during the last three fiscal years that were detail tested. However, the Organization’s management recognizes that there are still active contracts under the federal programs for fiscal year ending August 31, 2024 that were procured over three fiscal years ago in which adherence to procurement policies, specifically documentation history of procurement, has not been maintained. In regards to progress made in reducing the number of vendors that are out of compliance, specifically vendors with over $50,000 of annual expenditures that were categorized as “legacy” vendors procured under the previous procurement policies, the Organization went from having 100 vendors totaling approximately $159 million in expenditures as of August 31, 2023, to 46 vendors totaling approximately $119 million as of August 31, 2024. This shows a decrease of 54% in the number of legacy vendors with a decrease of 25% in the dollar-value of the legacy vendors year over year. Further, the Organization continues to make progress in reducing legacy vendor non-compliance by reducing that number to 33 vendors totaling approximately $113 million as of January 2, 2025. As this has been a recurring finding in which management is actively getting all active contracts under the current procurement policies, only those current contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years were detail tested. Of the approximately 70 active vendor contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years that were wholly or partially funded with Unaccompanied Alien Children Program revenue dollars or with Child Nutrition Cluster Program revenue dollars, ten were tested with no errors noted. Cause The Organization is aware they are operating under contracts that were procured in previous years that may not have all the records maintained. Contracts procured within the last three years show compliance with federal requirements based on detailed testing. Reprocuring all of the legacy contracts at once would potentially cause disruptions in operations due to the products/services related those vendors playing an important role in the Organization’s day-to-day operations. As such, the Organization still has active contracts procured under the old policies that they are working on reprocuring as these contracts’ renewal dates arise, if not earlier. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization could potentially be under contract with vendors that are not the best value, not adequately qualified, potentially suspended or debarred, or otherwise not suitable for contract under federal procurement guidelines. No questioned costs were identified, as services/goods under these contracts that were previously tested were deemed to be allowable under the program, and no exceptions noted for allowable costs/activities for samples that included payment to those vendors in previous years or current year. Recommendation The Organization should continue to review all its “legacy” contracts that were procured under the previous procurement policies to determine if there is proper documentation maintained for compliance with applicable procurement guidelines. This includes systematically re-procuring any current contracts not in compliance as soon as feasible. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See corrective action plan.
Repeat finding 2023-001, 2022-001, and 2021-002 FAN 93.676 Unaccompanied Alien Children Program Child Nutrition Cluster Procurement and Suspension & Debarment Type of Finding: Non-Compliance U.S. Department of Health & Human Services U.S Department of Agriculture Criteria Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(b)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The requirements that apply to procurement under grants and cooperative agreements are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.326, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. The requirements for non-procurement suspension and debarment are contained in OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, “Debarment and Suspension;” federal awarding agency regulations in Title 2 of the CFR adopting/implementing the OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180; program legislation; and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition The Organization had no findings for contracts procured during the last three fiscal years that were detail tested. However, the Organization’s management recognizes that there are still active contracts under the federal programs for fiscal year ending August 31, 2024 that were procured over three fiscal years ago in which adherence to procurement policies, specifically documentation history of procurement, has not been maintained. In regards to progress made in reducing the number of vendors that are out of compliance, specifically vendors with over $50,000 of annual expenditures that were categorized as “legacy” vendors procured under the previous procurement policies, the Organization went from having 100 vendors totaling approximately $159 million in expenditures as of August 31, 2023, to 46 vendors totaling approximately $119 million as of August 31, 2024. This shows a decrease of 54% in the number of legacy vendors with a decrease of 25% in the dollar-value of the legacy vendors year over year. Further, the Organization continues to make progress in reducing legacy vendor non-compliance by reducing that number to 33 vendors totaling approximately $113 million as of January 2, 2025. As this has been a recurring finding in which management is actively getting all active contracts under the current procurement policies, only those current contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years were detail tested. Of the approximately 70 active vendor contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years that were wholly or partially funded with Unaccompanied Alien Children Program revenue dollars or with Child Nutrition Cluster Program revenue dollars, ten were tested with no errors noted. Cause The Organization is aware they are operating under contracts that were procured in previous years that may not have all the records maintained. Contracts procured within the last three years show compliance with federal requirements based on detailed testing. Reprocuring all of the legacy contracts at once would potentially cause disruptions in operations due to the products/services related those vendors playing an important role in the Organization’s day-to-day operations. As such, the Organization still has active contracts procured under the old policies that they are working on reprocuring as these contracts’ renewal dates arise, if not earlier. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization could potentially be under contract with vendors that are not the best value, not adequately qualified, potentially suspended or debarred, or otherwise not suitable for contract under federal procurement guidelines. No questioned costs were identified, as services/goods under these contracts that were previously tested were deemed to be allowable under the program, and no exceptions noted for allowable costs/activities for samples that included payment to those vendors in previous years or current year. Recommendation The Organization should continue to review all its “legacy” contracts that were procured under the previous procurement policies to determine if there is proper documentation maintained for compliance with applicable procurement guidelines. This includes systematically re-procuring any current contracts not in compliance as soon as feasible. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See corrective action plan.
Repeat finding 2023-001, 2022-001, and 2021-002 FAN 93.676 Unaccompanied Alien Children Program Child Nutrition Cluster Procurement and Suspension & Debarment Type of Finding: Non-Compliance U.S. Department of Health & Human Services U.S Department of Agriculture Criteria Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(b)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The requirements that apply to procurement under grants and cooperative agreements are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.326, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. The requirements for non-procurement suspension and debarment are contained in OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, “Debarment and Suspension;” federal awarding agency regulations in Title 2 of the CFR adopting/implementing the OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180; program legislation; and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition The Organization had no findings for contracts procured during the last three fiscal years that were detail tested. However, the Organization’s management recognizes that there are still active contracts under the federal programs for fiscal year ending August 31, 2024 that were procured over three fiscal years ago in which adherence to procurement policies, specifically documentation history of procurement, has not been maintained. In regards to progress made in reducing the number of vendors that are out of compliance, specifically vendors with over $50,000 of annual expenditures that were categorized as “legacy” vendors procured under the previous procurement policies, the Organization went from having 100 vendors totaling approximately $159 million in expenditures as of August 31, 2023, to 46 vendors totaling approximately $119 million as of August 31, 2024. This shows a decrease of 54% in the number of legacy vendors with a decrease of 25% in the dollar-value of the legacy vendors year over year. Further, the Organization continues to make progress in reducing legacy vendor non-compliance by reducing that number to 33 vendors totaling approximately $113 million as of January 2, 2025. As this has been a recurring finding in which management is actively getting all active contracts under the current procurement policies, only those current contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years were detail tested. Of the approximately 70 active vendor contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years that were wholly or partially funded with Unaccompanied Alien Children Program revenue dollars or with Child Nutrition Cluster Program revenue dollars, ten were tested with no errors noted. Cause The Organization is aware they are operating under contracts that were procured in previous years that may not have all the records maintained. Contracts procured within the last three years show compliance with federal requirements based on detailed testing. Reprocuring all of the legacy contracts at once would potentially cause disruptions in operations due to the products/services related those vendors playing an important role in the Organization’s day-to-day operations. As such, the Organization still has active contracts procured under the old policies that they are working on reprocuring as these contracts’ renewal dates arise, if not earlier. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization could potentially be under contract with vendors that are not the best value, not adequately qualified, potentially suspended or debarred, or otherwise not suitable for contract under federal procurement guidelines. No questioned costs were identified, as services/goods under these contracts that were previously tested were deemed to be allowable under the program, and no exceptions noted for allowable costs/activities for samples that included payment to those vendors in previous years or current year. Recommendation The Organization should continue to review all its “legacy” contracts that were procured under the previous procurement policies to determine if there is proper documentation maintained for compliance with applicable procurement guidelines. This includes systematically re-procuring any current contracts not in compliance as soon as feasible. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See corrective action plan.
Repeat finding 2023-001, 2022-001, and 2021-002 FAN 93.676 Unaccompanied Alien Children Program Child Nutrition Cluster Procurement and Suspension & Debarment Type of Finding: Non-Compliance U.S. Department of Health & Human Services U.S Department of Agriculture Criteria Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(b)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The requirements that apply to procurement under grants and cooperative agreements are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.326, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. The requirements for non-procurement suspension and debarment are contained in OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, “Debarment and Suspension;” federal awarding agency regulations in Title 2 of the CFR adopting/implementing the OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180; program legislation; and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition The Organization had no findings for contracts procured during the last three fiscal years that were detail tested. However, the Organization’s management recognizes that there are still active contracts under the federal programs for fiscal year ending August 31, 2024 that were procured over three fiscal years ago in which adherence to procurement policies, specifically documentation history of procurement, has not been maintained. In regards to progress made in reducing the number of vendors that are out of compliance, specifically vendors with over $50,000 of annual expenditures that were categorized as “legacy” vendors procured under the previous procurement policies, the Organization went from having 100 vendors totaling approximately $159 million in expenditures as of August 31, 2023, to 46 vendors totaling approximately $119 million as of August 31, 2024. This shows a decrease of 54% in the number of legacy vendors with a decrease of 25% in the dollar-value of the legacy vendors year over year. Further, the Organization continues to make progress in reducing legacy vendor non-compliance by reducing that number to 33 vendors totaling approximately $113 million as of January 2, 2025. As this has been a recurring finding in which management is actively getting all active contracts under the current procurement policies, only those current contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years were detail tested. Of the approximately 70 active vendor contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years that were wholly or partially funded with Unaccompanied Alien Children Program revenue dollars or with Child Nutrition Cluster Program revenue dollars, ten were tested with no errors noted. Cause The Organization is aware they are operating under contracts that were procured in previous years that may not have all the records maintained. Contracts procured within the last three years show compliance with federal requirements based on detailed testing. Reprocuring all of the legacy contracts at once would potentially cause disruptions in operations due to the products/services related those vendors playing an important role in the Organization’s day-to-day operations. As such, the Organization still has active contracts procured under the old policies that they are working on reprocuring as these contracts’ renewal dates arise, if not earlier. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization could potentially be under contract with vendors that are not the best value, not adequately qualified, potentially suspended or debarred, or otherwise not suitable for contract under federal procurement guidelines. No questioned costs were identified, as services/goods under these contracts that were previously tested were deemed to be allowable under the program, and no exceptions noted for allowable costs/activities for samples that included payment to those vendors in previous years or current year. Recommendation The Organization should continue to review all its “legacy” contracts that were procured under the previous procurement policies to determine if there is proper documentation maintained for compliance with applicable procurement guidelines. This includes systematically re-procuring any current contracts not in compliance as soon as feasible. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See corrective action plan.
Repeat finding 2023-001, 2022-001, and 2021-002 FAN 93.676 Unaccompanied Alien Children Program Child Nutrition Cluster Procurement and Suspension & Debarment Type of Finding: Non-Compliance U.S. Department of Health & Human Services U.S Department of Agriculture Criteria Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(b)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The requirements that apply to procurement under grants and cooperative agreements are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.326, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. The requirements for non-procurement suspension and debarment are contained in OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, “Debarment and Suspension;” federal awarding agency regulations in Title 2 of the CFR adopting/implementing the OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180; program legislation; and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition The Organization had no findings for contracts procured during the last three fiscal years that were detail tested. However, the Organization’s management recognizes that there are still active contracts under the federal programs for fiscal year ending August 31, 2024 that were procured over three fiscal years ago in which adherence to procurement policies, specifically documentation history of procurement, has not been maintained. In regards to progress made in reducing the number of vendors that are out of compliance, specifically vendors with over $50,000 of annual expenditures that were categorized as “legacy” vendors procured under the previous procurement policies, the Organization went from having 100 vendors totaling approximately $159 million in expenditures as of August 31, 2023, to 46 vendors totaling approximately $119 million as of August 31, 2024. This shows a decrease of 54% in the number of legacy vendors with a decrease of 25% in the dollar-value of the legacy vendors year over year. Further, the Organization continues to make progress in reducing legacy vendor non-compliance by reducing that number to 33 vendors totaling approximately $113 million as of January 2, 2025. As this has been a recurring finding in which management is actively getting all active contracts under the current procurement policies, only those current contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years were detail tested. Of the approximately 70 active vendor contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years that were wholly or partially funded with Unaccompanied Alien Children Program revenue dollars or with Child Nutrition Cluster Program revenue dollars, ten were tested with no errors noted. Cause The Organization is aware they are operating under contracts that were procured in previous years that may not have all the records maintained. Contracts procured within the last three years show compliance with federal requirements based on detailed testing. Reprocuring all of the legacy contracts at once would potentially cause disruptions in operations due to the products/services related those vendors playing an important role in the Organization’s day-to-day operations. As such, the Organization still has active contracts procured under the old policies that they are working on reprocuring as these contracts’ renewal dates arise, if not earlier. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization could potentially be under contract with vendors that are not the best value, not adequately qualified, potentially suspended or debarred, or otherwise not suitable for contract under federal procurement guidelines. No questioned costs were identified, as services/goods under these contracts that were previously tested were deemed to be allowable under the program, and no exceptions noted for allowable costs/activities for samples that included payment to those vendors in previous years or current year. Recommendation The Organization should continue to review all its “legacy” contracts that were procured under the previous procurement policies to determine if there is proper documentation maintained for compliance with applicable procurement guidelines. This includes systematically re-procuring any current contracts not in compliance as soon as feasible. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See corrective action plan.
Repeat finding 2023-001, 2022-001, and 2021-002 FAN 93.676 Unaccompanied Alien Children Program Child Nutrition Cluster Procurement and Suspension & Debarment Type of Finding: Non-Compliance U.S. Department of Health & Human Services U.S Department of Agriculture Criteria Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(b)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The requirements that apply to procurement under grants and cooperative agreements are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.326, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. The requirements for non-procurement suspension and debarment are contained in OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, “Debarment and Suspension;” federal awarding agency regulations in Title 2 of the CFR adopting/implementing the OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180; program legislation; and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition The Organization had no findings for contracts procured during the last three fiscal years that were detail tested. However, the Organization’s management recognizes that there are still active contracts under the federal programs for fiscal year ending August 31, 2024 that were procured over three fiscal years ago in which adherence to procurement policies, specifically documentation history of procurement, has not been maintained. In regards to progress made in reducing the number of vendors that are out of compliance, specifically vendors with over $50,000 of annual expenditures that were categorized as “legacy” vendors procured under the previous procurement policies, the Organization went from having 100 vendors totaling approximately $159 million in expenditures as of August 31, 2023, to 46 vendors totaling approximately $119 million as of August 31, 2024. This shows a decrease of 54% in the number of legacy vendors with a decrease of 25% in the dollar-value of the legacy vendors year over year. Further, the Organization continues to make progress in reducing legacy vendor non-compliance by reducing that number to 33 vendors totaling approximately $113 million as of January 2, 2025. As this has been a recurring finding in which management is actively getting all active contracts under the current procurement policies, only those current contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years were detail tested. Of the approximately 70 active vendor contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years that were wholly or partially funded with Unaccompanied Alien Children Program revenue dollars or with Child Nutrition Cluster Program revenue dollars, ten were tested with no errors noted. Cause The Organization is aware they are operating under contracts that were procured in previous years that may not have all the records maintained. Contracts procured within the last three years show compliance with federal requirements based on detailed testing. Reprocuring all of the legacy contracts at once would potentially cause disruptions in operations due to the products/services related those vendors playing an important role in the Organization’s day-to-day operations. As such, the Organization still has active contracts procured under the old policies that they are working on reprocuring as these contracts’ renewal dates arise, if not earlier. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization could potentially be under contract with vendors that are not the best value, not adequately qualified, potentially suspended or debarred, or otherwise not suitable for contract under federal procurement guidelines. No questioned costs were identified, as services/goods under these contracts that were previously tested were deemed to be allowable under the program, and no exceptions noted for allowable costs/activities for samples that included payment to those vendors in previous years or current year. Recommendation The Organization should continue to review all its “legacy” contracts that were procured under the previous procurement policies to determine if there is proper documentation maintained for compliance with applicable procurement guidelines. This includes systematically re-procuring any current contracts not in compliance as soon as feasible. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See corrective action plan.
Repeat finding 2023-001, 2022-001, and 2021-002 FAN 93.676 Unaccompanied Alien Children Program Child Nutrition Cluster Procurement and Suspension & Debarment Type of Finding: Non-Compliance U.S. Department of Health & Human Services U.S Department of Agriculture Criteria Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(b)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The requirements that apply to procurement under grants and cooperative agreements are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.326, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. The requirements for non-procurement suspension and debarment are contained in OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, “Debarment and Suspension;” federal awarding agency regulations in Title 2 of the CFR adopting/implementing the OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180; program legislation; and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition The Organization had no findings for contracts procured during the last three fiscal years that were detail tested. However, the Organization’s management recognizes that there are still active contracts under the federal programs for fiscal year ending August 31, 2024 that were procured over three fiscal years ago in which adherence to procurement policies, specifically documentation history of procurement, has not been maintained. In regards to progress made in reducing the number of vendors that are out of compliance, specifically vendors with over $50,000 of annual expenditures that were categorized as “legacy” vendors procured under the previous procurement policies, the Organization went from having 100 vendors totaling approximately $159 million in expenditures as of August 31, 2023, to 46 vendors totaling approximately $119 million as of August 31, 2024. This shows a decrease of 54% in the number of legacy vendors with a decrease of 25% in the dollar-value of the legacy vendors year over year. Further, the Organization continues to make progress in reducing legacy vendor non-compliance by reducing that number to 33 vendors totaling approximately $113 million as of January 2, 2025. As this has been a recurring finding in which management is actively getting all active contracts under the current procurement policies, only those current contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years were detail tested. Of the approximately 70 active vendor contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years that were wholly or partially funded with Unaccompanied Alien Children Program revenue dollars or with Child Nutrition Cluster Program revenue dollars, ten were tested with no errors noted. Cause The Organization is aware they are operating under contracts that were procured in previous years that may not have all the records maintained. Contracts procured within the last three years show compliance with federal requirements based on detailed testing. Reprocuring all of the legacy contracts at once would potentially cause disruptions in operations due to the products/services related those vendors playing an important role in the Organization’s day-to-day operations. As such, the Organization still has active contracts procured under the old policies that they are working on reprocuring as these contracts’ renewal dates arise, if not earlier. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization could potentially be under contract with vendors that are not the best value, not adequately qualified, potentially suspended or debarred, or otherwise not suitable for contract under federal procurement guidelines. No questioned costs were identified, as services/goods under these contracts that were previously tested were deemed to be allowable under the program, and no exceptions noted for allowable costs/activities for samples that included payment to those vendors in previous years or current year. Recommendation The Organization should continue to review all its “legacy” contracts that were procured under the previous procurement policies to determine if there is proper documentation maintained for compliance with applicable procurement guidelines. This includes systematically re-procuring any current contracts not in compliance as soon as feasible. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See corrective action plan.
Repeat finding 2023-001, 2022-001, and 2021-002 FAN 93.676 Unaccompanied Alien Children Program Child Nutrition Cluster Procurement and Suspension & Debarment Type of Finding: Non-Compliance U.S. Department of Health & Human Services U.S Department of Agriculture Criteria Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(b)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The requirements that apply to procurement under grants and cooperative agreements are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.326, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. The requirements for non-procurement suspension and debarment are contained in OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, “Debarment and Suspension;” federal awarding agency regulations in Title 2 of the CFR adopting/implementing the OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180; program legislation; and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition The Organization had no findings for contracts procured during the last three fiscal years that were detail tested. However, the Organization’s management recognizes that there are still active contracts under the federal programs for fiscal year ending August 31, 2024 that were procured over three fiscal years ago in which adherence to procurement policies, specifically documentation history of procurement, has not been maintained. In regards to progress made in reducing the number of vendors that are out of compliance, specifically vendors with over $50,000 of annual expenditures that were categorized as “legacy” vendors procured under the previous procurement policies, the Organization went from having 100 vendors totaling approximately $159 million in expenditures as of August 31, 2023, to 46 vendors totaling approximately $119 million as of August 31, 2024. This shows a decrease of 54% in the number of legacy vendors with a decrease of 25% in the dollar-value of the legacy vendors year over year. Further, the Organization continues to make progress in reducing legacy vendor non-compliance by reducing that number to 33 vendors totaling approximately $113 million as of January 2, 2025. As this has been a recurring finding in which management is actively getting all active contracts under the current procurement policies, only those current contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years were detail tested. Of the approximately 70 active vendor contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years that were wholly or partially funded with Unaccompanied Alien Children Program revenue dollars or with Child Nutrition Cluster Program revenue dollars, ten were tested with no errors noted. Cause The Organization is aware they are operating under contracts that were procured in previous years that may not have all the records maintained. Contracts procured within the last three years show compliance with federal requirements based on detailed testing. Reprocuring all of the legacy contracts at once would potentially cause disruptions in operations due to the products/services related those vendors playing an important role in the Organization’s day-to-day operations. As such, the Organization still has active contracts procured under the old policies that they are working on reprocuring as these contracts’ renewal dates arise, if not earlier. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization could potentially be under contract with vendors that are not the best value, not adequately qualified, potentially suspended or debarred, or otherwise not suitable for contract under federal procurement guidelines. No questioned costs were identified, as services/goods under these contracts that were previously tested were deemed to be allowable under the program, and no exceptions noted for allowable costs/activities for samples that included payment to those vendors in previous years or current year. Recommendation The Organization should continue to review all its “legacy” contracts that were procured under the previous procurement policies to determine if there is proper documentation maintained for compliance with applicable procurement guidelines. This includes systematically re-procuring any current contracts not in compliance as soon as feasible. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See corrective action plan.
Repeat finding 2023-001, 2022-001, and 2021-002 FAN 93.676 Unaccompanied Alien Children Program Child Nutrition Cluster Procurement and Suspension & Debarment Type of Finding: Non-Compliance U.S. Department of Health & Human Services U.S Department of Agriculture Criteria Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(b)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The requirements that apply to procurement under grants and cooperative agreements are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.326, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. The requirements for non-procurement suspension and debarment are contained in OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, “Debarment and Suspension;” federal awarding agency regulations in Title 2 of the CFR adopting/implementing the OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180; program legislation; and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition The Organization had no findings for contracts procured during the last three fiscal years that were detail tested. However, the Organization’s management recognizes that there are still active contracts under the federal programs for fiscal year ending August 31, 2024 that were procured over three fiscal years ago in which adherence to procurement policies, specifically documentation history of procurement, has not been maintained. In regards to progress made in reducing the number of vendors that are out of compliance, specifically vendors with over $50,000 of annual expenditures that were categorized as “legacy” vendors procured under the previous procurement policies, the Organization went from having 100 vendors totaling approximately $159 million in expenditures as of August 31, 2023, to 46 vendors totaling approximately $119 million as of August 31, 2024. This shows a decrease of 54% in the number of legacy vendors with a decrease of 25% in the dollar-value of the legacy vendors year over year. Further, the Organization continues to make progress in reducing legacy vendor non-compliance by reducing that number to 33 vendors totaling approximately $113 million as of January 2, 2025. As this has been a recurring finding in which management is actively getting all active contracts under the current procurement policies, only those current contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years were detail tested. Of the approximately 70 active vendor contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years that were wholly or partially funded with Unaccompanied Alien Children Program revenue dollars or with Child Nutrition Cluster Program revenue dollars, ten were tested with no errors noted. Cause The Organization is aware they are operating under contracts that were procured in previous years that may not have all the records maintained. Contracts procured within the last three years show compliance with federal requirements based on detailed testing. Reprocuring all of the legacy contracts at once would potentially cause disruptions in operations due to the products/services related those vendors playing an important role in the Organization’s day-to-day operations. As such, the Organization still has active contracts procured under the old policies that they are working on reprocuring as these contracts’ renewal dates arise, if not earlier. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization could potentially be under contract with vendors that are not the best value, not adequately qualified, potentially suspended or debarred, or otherwise not suitable for contract under federal procurement guidelines. No questioned costs were identified, as services/goods under these contracts that were previously tested were deemed to be allowable under the program, and no exceptions noted for allowable costs/activities for samples that included payment to those vendors in previous years or current year. Recommendation The Organization should continue to review all its “legacy” contracts that were procured under the previous procurement policies to determine if there is proper documentation maintained for compliance with applicable procurement guidelines. This includes systematically re-procuring any current contracts not in compliance as soon as feasible. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See corrective action plan.