Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Program Name: Child Nutrition Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 10.553/10.555 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: 12060-SDE64370-20560 Pass-Through Agency: State Department of Education Pass-Through Number(s): N/A Award Period: 7/1/2022 - 6/30/2023 Type of Finding: -Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance -Other Matters (Noncompliance) Criteria or Specific Requirement: 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (UG) requires compliance with the provisions of procurement standards. Condition: The Board of Education’s procurement standards do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned Costs: None noted. Context: Although the Board of Education did not have a policy in place in conformity with the federal uniform guidance criteria, the Board of Education did follow their purchasing policies. Cause: The policy has not been updated to be in compliance with uniform guidance requirements. Effect: With the absence of a compliant policy, the Board of Education is at risk for noncompliance as it relates to federal procurement. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the Board of Education review its formal procurement policies and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 and 200.326. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Management agrees with this finding and is in process of developing a formal policy.
Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury, Department of Agriculture and Department of Transportation Federal Program Name: American Rescue Plan Act, Child Nutrition Cluster, and Highway Planning and Construction Assistance Listing Number: 21.027,10.553/10.555, and 20.205 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: 12060-OPM20600-29669, 12060-SDE64370-20560 and 12062-DOT57191-22108 Pass-Through Agency: Office of Policy and Management and State Department of Education and State Department of Transportation Pass-Through Number(s): N/A Award Period: 7/1/2022 - 6/30/2023 Type of Finding: -Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance -Other Matters (Noncompliance) Criteria or Specific Requirement: 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (UG) requires compliance with the provisions of procurement standards. Condition: The Board of Education’s procurement standards do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned Costs: None noted. Context: Although the Board of Education did not have a policy in place in conformity with the federal uniform guidance criteria, the Board of Education did follow their purchasing policies. Cause: The policy has not been updated to be in compliance with uniform guidance requirements. Effect: With the absence of a compliant policy, the Board of Education is at risk for noncompliance as it relates to federal procurement. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the Board of Education review its formal procurement policies and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 and 200.326. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Management agrees with this finding and is in process of developing a formal policy.
Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Program Name: Child Nutrition Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 10.553/10.555 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: 12060-SDE64370-20560 Pass-Through Agency: State Department of Education Pass-Through Number(s): N/A Award Period: 7/1/2022 - 6/30/2023 Type of Finding: -Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance -Other Matters (Noncompliance) Criteria or Specific Requirement: 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (UG) requires compliance with the provisions of procurement standards. Condition: The Board of Education’s procurement standards do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned Costs: None noted. Context: Although the Board of Education did not have a policy in place in conformity with the federal uniform guidance criteria, the Board of Education did follow their purchasing policies. Cause: The policy has not been updated to be in compliance with uniform guidance requirements. Effect: With the absence of a compliant policy, the Board of Education is at risk for noncompliance as it relates to federal procurement. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the Board of Education review its formal procurement policies and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 and 200.326. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Management agrees with this finding and is in process of developing a formal policy.
Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury, Department of Agriculture and Department of Transportation Federal Program Name: American Rescue Plan Act, Child Nutrition Cluster, and Highway Planning and Construction Assistance Listing Number: 21.027,10.553/10.555, and 20.205 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: 12060-OPM20600-29669, 12060-SDE64370-20560 and 12062-DOT57191-22108 Pass-Through Agency: Office of Policy and Management and State Department of Education and State Department of Transportation Pass-Through Number(s): N/A Award Period: 7/1/2022 - 6/30/2023 Type of Finding: -Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance -Other Matters (Noncompliance) Criteria or Specific Requirement: 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (UG) requires compliance with the provisions of procurement standards. Condition: The Board of Education’s procurement standards do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned Costs: None noted. Context: Although the Board of Education did not have a policy in place in conformity with the federal uniform guidance criteria, the Board of Education did follow their purchasing policies. Cause: The policy has not been updated to be in compliance with uniform guidance requirements. Effect: With the absence of a compliant policy, the Board of Education is at risk for noncompliance as it relates to federal procurement. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the Board of Education review its formal procurement policies and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 and 200.326. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Management agrees with this finding and is in process of developing a formal policy.
Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Program Name: Child Nutrition Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 10.553/10.555 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: 12060-SDE64370-20560 Pass-Through Agency: State Department of Education Pass-Through Number(s): N/A Award Period: 7/1/2022 - 6/30/2023 Type of Finding: -Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance -Other Matters (Noncompliance) Criteria or Specific Requirement: 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (UG) requires compliance with the provisions of procurement standards. Condition: The Board of Education’s procurement standards do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned Costs: None noted. Context: Although the Board of Education did not have a policy in place in conformity with the federal uniform guidance criteria, the Board of Education did follow their purchasing policies. Cause: The policy has not been updated to be in compliance with uniform guidance requirements. Effect: With the absence of a compliant policy, the Board of Education is at risk for noncompliance as it relates to federal procurement. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the Board of Education review its formal procurement policies and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 and 200.326. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Management agrees with this finding and is in process of developing a formal policy.
Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury, Department of Agriculture and Department of Transportation Federal Program Name: American Rescue Plan Act, Child Nutrition Cluster, and Highway Planning and Construction Assistance Listing Number: 21.027,10.553/10.555, and 20.205 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: 12060-OPM20600-29669, 12060-SDE64370-20560 and 12062-DOT57191-22108 Pass-Through Agency: Office of Policy and Management and State Department of Education and State Department of Transportation Pass-Through Number(s): N/A Award Period: 7/1/2022 - 6/30/2023 Type of Finding: -Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance -Other Matters (Noncompliance) Criteria or Specific Requirement: 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (UG) requires compliance with the provisions of procurement standards. Condition: The Board of Education’s procurement standards do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned Costs: None noted. Context: Although the Board of Education did not have a policy in place in conformity with the federal uniform guidance criteria, the Board of Education did follow their purchasing policies. Cause: The policy has not been updated to be in compliance with uniform guidance requirements. Effect: With the absence of a compliant policy, the Board of Education is at risk for noncompliance as it relates to federal procurement. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the Board of Education review its formal procurement policies and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 and 200.326. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Management agrees with this finding and is in process of developing a formal policy.
Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury, Department of Agriculture and Department of Transportation Federal Program Name: American Rescue Plan Act, Child Nutrition Cluster, and Highway Planning and Construction Assistance Listing Number: 21.027,10.553/10.555, and 20.205 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: 12060-OPM20600-29669, 12060-SDE64370-20560 and 12062-DOT57191-22108 Pass-Through Agency: Office of Policy and Management and State Department of Education and State Department of Transportation Pass-Through Number(s): N/A Award Period: 7/1/2022 - 6/30/2023 Type of Finding: -Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance -Other Matters (Noncompliance) Criteria or Specific Requirement: 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (UG) requires compliance with the provisions of procurement standards. Condition: The Board of Education’s procurement standards do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned Costs: None noted. Context: Although the Board of Education did not have a policy in place in conformity with the federal uniform guidance criteria, the Board of Education did follow their purchasing policies. Cause: The policy has not been updated to be in compliance with uniform guidance requirements. Effect: With the absence of a compliant policy, the Board of Education is at risk for noncompliance as it relates to federal procurement. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the Board of Education review its formal procurement policies and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 and 200.326. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Management agrees with this finding and is in process of developing a formal policy.
Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury, Department of Agriculture and Department of Transportation Federal Program Name: American Rescue Plan Act, Child Nutrition Cluster, and Highway Planning and Construction Assistance Listing Number: 21.027,10.553/10.555, and 20.205 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: 12060-OPM20600-29669, 12060-SDE64370-20560 and 12062-DOT57191-22108 Pass-Through Agency: Office of Policy and Management and State Department of Education and State Department of Transportation Pass-Through Number(s): N/A Award Period: 7/1/2022 - 6/30/2023 Type of Finding: -Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance -Other Matters (Noncompliance) Criteria or Specific Requirement: 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (UG) requires compliance with the provisions of procurement standards. Condition: The Board of Education’s procurement standards do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned Costs: None noted. Context: Although the Board of Education did not have a policy in place in conformity with the federal uniform guidance criteria, the Board of Education did follow their purchasing policies. Cause: The policy has not been updated to be in compliance with uniform guidance requirements. Effect: With the absence of a compliant policy, the Board of Education is at risk for noncompliance as it relates to federal procurement. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the Board of Education review its formal procurement policies and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 and 200.326. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Management agrees with this finding and is in process of developing a formal policy.
Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury, Department of Agriculture and Department of Transportation Federal Program Name: American Rescue Plan Act, Child Nutrition Cluster, and Highway Planning and Construction Assistance Listing Number: 21.027,10.553/10.555, and 20.205 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: 12060-OPM20600-29669, 12060-SDE64370-20560 and 12062-DOT57191-22108 Pass-Through Agency: Office of Policy and Management and State Department of Education and State Department of Transportation Pass-Through Number(s): N/A Award Period: 7/1/2022 - 6/30/2023 Type of Finding: -Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance -Other Matters (Noncompliance) Criteria or Specific Requirement: 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (UG) requires compliance with the provisions of procurement standards. Condition: The Board of Education’s procurement standards do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned Costs: None noted. Context: Although the Board of Education did not have a policy in place in conformity with the federal uniform guidance criteria, the Board of Education did follow their purchasing policies. Cause: The policy has not been updated to be in compliance with uniform guidance requirements. Effect: With the absence of a compliant policy, the Board of Education is at risk for noncompliance as it relates to federal procurement. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the Board of Education review its formal procurement policies and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 and 200.326. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Management agrees with this finding and is in process of developing a formal policy.
Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury, Department of Agriculture and Department of Transportation Federal Program Name: American Rescue Plan Act, Child Nutrition Cluster, and Highway Planning and Construction Assistance Listing Number: 21.027,10.553/10.555, and 20.205 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: 12060-OPM20600-29669, 12060-SDE64370-20560 and 12062-DOT57191-22108 Pass-Through Agency: Office of Policy and Management and State Department of Education and State Department of Transportation Pass-Through Number(s): N/A Award Period: 7/1/2022 - 6/30/2023 Type of Finding: -Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance -Other Matters (Noncompliance) Criteria or Specific Requirement: 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (UG) requires compliance with the provisions of procurement standards. Condition: The Board of Education’s procurement standards do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned Costs: None noted. Context: Although the Board of Education did not have a policy in place in conformity with the federal uniform guidance criteria, the Board of Education did follow their purchasing policies. Cause: The policy has not been updated to be in compliance with uniform guidance requirements. Effect: With the absence of a compliant policy, the Board of Education is at risk for noncompliance as it relates to federal procurement. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the Board of Education review its formal procurement policies and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 and 200.326. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Management agrees with this finding and is in process of developing a formal policy.
Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury, Department of Agriculture and Department of Transportation Federal Program Name: American Rescue Plan Act, Child Nutrition Cluster, and Highway Planning and Construction Assistance Listing Number: 21.027,10.553/10.555, and 20.205 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: 12060-OPM20600-29669, 12060-SDE64370-20560 and 12062-DOT57191-22108 Pass-Through Agency: Office of Policy and Management and State Department of Education and State Department of Transportation Pass-Through Number(s): N/A Award Period: 7/1/2022 - 6/30/2023 Type of Finding: -Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance -Other Matters (Noncompliance) Criteria or Specific Requirement: 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (UG) requires compliance with the provisions of procurement standards. Condition: The Board of Education’s procurement standards do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned Costs: None noted. Context: Although the Board of Education did not have a policy in place in conformity with the federal uniform guidance criteria, the Board of Education did follow their purchasing policies. Cause: The policy has not been updated to be in compliance with uniform guidance requirements. Effect: With the absence of a compliant policy, the Board of Education is at risk for noncompliance as it relates to federal procurement. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the Board of Education review its formal procurement policies and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 and 200.326. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Management agrees with this finding and is in process of developing a formal policy.
Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury, Department of Agriculture and Department of Transportation Federal Program Name: American Rescue Plan Act, Child Nutrition Cluster, and Highway Planning and Construction Assistance Listing Number: 21.027,10.553/10.555, and 20.205 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: 12060-OPM20600-29669, 12060-SDE64370-20560 and 12062-DOT57191-22108 Pass-Through Agency: Office of Policy and Management and State Department of Education and State Department of Transportation Pass-Through Number(s): N/A Award Period: 7/1/2022 - 6/30/2023 Type of Finding: -Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance -Other Matters (Noncompliance) Criteria or Specific Requirement: 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (UG) requires compliance with the provisions of procurement standards. Condition: The Board of Education’s procurement standards do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned Costs: None noted. Context: Although the Board of Education did not have a policy in place in conformity with the federal uniform guidance criteria, the Board of Education did follow their purchasing policies. Cause: The policy has not been updated to be in compliance with uniform guidance requirements. Effect: With the absence of a compliant policy, the Board of Education is at risk for noncompliance as it relates to federal procurement. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the Board of Education review its formal procurement policies and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 and 200.326. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Management agrees with this finding and is in process of developing a formal policy.
Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury, Department of Agriculture and Department of Transportation Federal Program Name: American Rescue Plan Act, Child Nutrition Cluster, and Highway Planning and Construction Assistance Listing Number: 21.027,10.553/10.555, and 20.205 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: 12060-OPM20600-29669, 12060-SDE64370-20560 and 12062-DOT57191-22108 Pass-Through Agency: Office of Policy and Management and State Department of Education and State Department of Transportation Pass-Through Number(s): N/A Award Period: 7/1/2022 - 6/30/2023 Type of Finding: -Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance -Other Matters (Noncompliance) Criteria or Specific Requirement: 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (UG) requires compliance with the provisions of procurement standards. Condition: The Board of Education’s procurement standards do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned Costs: None noted. Context: Although the Board of Education did not have a policy in place in conformity with the federal uniform guidance criteria, the Board of Education did follow their purchasing policies. Cause: The policy has not been updated to be in compliance with uniform guidance requirements. Effect: With the absence of a compliant policy, the Board of Education is at risk for noncompliance as it relates to federal procurement. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the Board of Education review its formal procurement policies and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 and 200.326. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Management agrees with this finding and is in process of developing a formal policy.
Finding: Procurement Assistance Listing No. 21.027 COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds U.S. Department of The Treasury pass through from Jefferson County and Signal Behavioral Health Network Award Year: 2023 Award Number: Not Provided Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.318, non-Federal entities must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State and local regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity’s documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in 2 CFR 200.317 through 200.327. The Organizations procurement policy requires for Small purchases between $10,000 and $250,000. Competitive price quotes must be obtained to allow for full and open competition. a. A written solicitation including specs will be prepared and prices (might also include quality, delivery, geographical preference) obtained from multiple sources (preferably three or more) either by providing specs to the vendors or researching vendor prices (ex. internet search, vendor pricing list, verbal quotes). b. The price quotes will remain confidential before the award. c. Quotes will be evaluated by the business office and awarded based on price and the factors identified in the original request for quotes. d. Ensure all vendors receive the same information about the products or services and any special need that could affect the price. e. Check vendors for federal disbarment or suspension. Condition: During our procurement testing, we identified that the Organization did not obtain price quotes related to the purchase of $193,378 which fell within the small purchases threshold. Questioned Costs: $193,378 Context: We tested the Organizations one small purchase procurement which occurred during fiscal year 2023 in the amount of $193,978 and noted the above issue. A nonstatistical sampling methodology was used to select the sample. Effect: The Organization was not in compliance with its procurement policies and the Uniform Guidance. Cause: The Organization did not have adequate documentation to support the Organizations procurement decisions. Identification as a repeat finding: Not a repeat finding Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization follow its procurement procedures for the acquisition of property or services as required under a Federal award or sub-award. Views of responsible officials: The Organization agrees with the finding. See separate report for planned corrective actions.
Finding: Procurement Assistance Listing No. 21.027 COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds U.S. Department of The Treasury pass through from Jefferson County and Signal Behavioral Health Network Award Year: 2023 Award Number: Not Provided Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.318, non-Federal entities must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State and local regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity’s documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in 2 CFR 200.317 through 200.327. The Organizations procurement policy requires for Small purchases between $10,000 and $250,000. Competitive price quotes must be obtained to allow for full and open competition. a. A written solicitation including specs will be prepared and prices (might also include quality, delivery, geographical preference) obtained from multiple sources (preferably three or more) either by providing specs to the vendors or researching vendor prices (ex. internet search, vendor pricing list, verbal quotes). b. The price quotes will remain confidential before the award. c. Quotes will be evaluated by the business office and awarded based on price and the factors identified in the original request for quotes. d. Ensure all vendors receive the same information about the products or services and any special need that could affect the price. e. Check vendors for federal disbarment or suspension. Condition: During our procurement testing, we identified that the Organization did not obtain price quotes related to the purchase of $193,378 which fell within the small purchases threshold. Questioned Costs: $193,378 Context: We tested the Organizations one small purchase procurement which occurred during fiscal year 2023 in the amount of $193,978 and noted the above issue. A nonstatistical sampling methodology was used to select the sample. Effect: The Organization was not in compliance with its procurement policies and the Uniform Guidance. Cause: The Organization did not have adequate documentation to support the Organizations procurement decisions. Identification as a repeat finding: Not a repeat finding Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization follow its procurement procedures for the acquisition of property or services as required under a Federal award or sub-award. Views of responsible officials: The Organization agrees with the finding. See separate report for planned corrective actions.
CONDITION: During my review of Aliquippa School District’s compliance with the requirements of the Public School Code and the Uniform Guidance for procurement of goods and services, the District was unable to provide documentation or other evidence that either 1) three price or rate quotations for the purchase of goods between $10,000 and $22,500, and services between $10,000 and $250,000 were obtained, 2) competitive bidding was performed for the purchases of goods over $22,500 or 3) the vendor met the requirements of a ‘sole source provider’ with documentation to support such designation, for the following vendors: Saving Ourselves ($30,000), AGI Repair ($16,216), IXL ($19,218), Learning Systems Associates LLC ($25,425), AGC Education Inc. ($11,644), Apple ($163,505), Germ Solutions LLC ($160,070), Graham Security ($12,025), Curriculum Designers, Inc. ($27,875), RJ Rhodes Transit, Inc. ($24,845). CRITERIA: As specified in 2 CFR 200 318(i) of the Uniform Guidance, the District must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. In addition, small purchase procedures per 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2)(i) for acquisitions between the micro-purchase threshold (currently $10,000) and the simplified acquisition threshold (current $250,000), price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate. Per 24 PA Statue 8.807.1, there should be three quotes that are either written or well documented and over $22,500 formal bidding procedures must be utilized. Furthermore, Section 2 CFR 200.320(c’) of the Uniform Guidance details five (5) circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. CAUSE: District officials responsible for federal procurement did not adhere to District, state and federal policies and regulations regarding the expenditure of federal funds. EFFECT: The District did not comply with 1) the District’s Procurement Policy for Federal Programs, 2) the 24 PA Statute 8.807.1, 3) Section 2 CFR 200.300(a)(2)(i) of the Uniform Guidance regarding obtaining three price or rate quotations for the purchase of goods between $10,000 and $22,500, and services between $10,000 and $250,000, or 4) Section 2 CFR 200.318(i) and Section 2CFR 200.320(c’) of the Uniform Guidance regarding the proper documentation required for noncompetitive procurement using federal funding. QUESTIONED COST: $490,823 RECOMMENDATION: I recommend that for all future purchases of goods and/or services utilizing federal funds, that the District adhere to the requirements of 1) the District’s Procurement Policy for Federal Programs, 2) the 24 PA Statute 8.807.1, 3) Section 2 CFR 200.318(i) of the Uniform Guidance regarding maintaining records sufficient to detail the history of procurement which includes rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price, 4) Section 2 CFR 200.300(a)(2)(i) of the Uniform Guidance regarding obtaining three price or rate quotations for the purchase of goods between $10,000 and $22,500, and services between $10,000 and $250,000, and as applicable, and 5) Section 2 CFR 200.318(i) and Section 2CFR 200.320(c’) of the Uniform Guidance regarding the proper documentation required for noncompetitive procurement using federal funding. VIEW OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS: See Correction Action Plan
CONDITION: During my review of Aliquippa School District’s compliance with the requirements of the Public School Code and the Uniform Guidance for procurement of goods and services, the District was unable to provide documentation or other evidence that 1) competitive bidding was performed for the purchases of goods or services over $22,500 and 2) a cost or price analysis for purchases in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold ($250,000), or 3) the vendor met the requirements of a ‘sole source provider’ with documentation to support such designation, for the following vendors –– Houghton Mifflin-Harcourt ($509,919), Beaver Valley Intermediate Unit ($419,826), and Smart Solutions ($449,303). CRITERIA: As specified in 2 CFR 200. 318(i) of the Uniform Guidance, the District must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. In addition, small purchase procedures per 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2)(i) for acquisitions between the micro-purchase threshold (currently $10,000) and the simplified acquisition threshold (current $250,000), price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate. Per 24 PA Statue 8.807.1, there should be three quotes that are either written or well documented. Furthermore, Section 2 CFR 200.320(c’) of the Uniform Guidance details five (5) circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. CAUSE: District officials responsible for federal procurement did not adhere to District, state and federal policies and regulations regarding the expenditure of federal funds. EFFECT: The District did not comply with 1) the District’s Procurement Policy for Federal Programs, 2) the 24 PA Statute 8.807.1, 3) Section 2 CFR 200.318(i) and Section 2CFR 200.320(c’) of the Uniform Guidance regarding the proper documentation required for noncompetitive procurement using federal funding, or 4) Section CFR 200.324(a) of the Uniform Guidance regarding the requirement to perform a cost or price analysis for purchases in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold ($250,000). QUESTIONED COST: $1,379,048 RECOMMENDATION: I recommend that for all future purchases of goods and/or services utilizing federal funds, that the District adhere to the requirements of 1) the District’s Procurement Policy for Federal Programs, 2) the 24 PA Statute 8.807.1, 3) Section 2 CFR 200.318(i) of the Uniform Guidance regarding maintaining records sufficient to detail the history of procurement which includes rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price, 4) Section 2 CFR 200.300(a)(2)(i) of the Uniform Guidance regarding obtaining three price or rate quotations for the purchase of goods between $10,000 and $22,500, and services between $10,000 and $250,000, and as applicable, 5) Section 2 CFR 200.318(i) and Section 2CFR 200.320(c’) of the Uniform Guidance regarding the proper documentation required for noncompetitive procurement using federal funding, and 5) Section CFR 200.324(a) of the Uniform Guidance regarding the requirement to perform a cost or price analysis for purchases in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold ($250,000). VIEW OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS: See Correction Action Plan
CONDITION: During my review of Aliquippa School District’s compliance with the requirements of the Public School Code and the Uniform Guidance for procurement of goods and services, the District was unable to provide documentation or other evidence that either 1) three price or rate quotations for the purchase of goods between $10,000 and $22,500, and services between $10,000 and $250,000 were obtained, 2) competitive bidding was performed for the purchases of goods over $22,500 or 3) the vendor met the requirements of a ‘sole source provider’ with documentation to support such designation, for the following vendors: Saving Ourselves ($30,000), AGI Repair ($16,216), IXL ($19,218), Learning Systems Associates LLC ($25,425), AGC Education Inc. ($11,644), Apple ($163,505), Germ Solutions LLC ($160,070), Graham Security ($12,025), Curriculum Designers, Inc. ($27,875), RJ Rhodes Transit, Inc. ($24,845). CRITERIA: As specified in 2 CFR 200 318(i) of the Uniform Guidance, the District must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. In addition, small purchase procedures per 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2)(i) for acquisitions between the micro-purchase threshold (currently $10,000) and the simplified acquisition threshold (current $250,000), price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate. Per 24 PA Statue 8.807.1, there should be three quotes that are either written or well documented and over $22,500 formal bidding procedures must be utilized. Furthermore, Section 2 CFR 200.320(c’) of the Uniform Guidance details five (5) circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. CAUSE: District officials responsible for federal procurement did not adhere to District, state and federal policies and regulations regarding the expenditure of federal funds. EFFECT: The District did not comply with 1) the District’s Procurement Policy for Federal Programs, 2) the 24 PA Statute 8.807.1, 3) Section 2 CFR 200.300(a)(2)(i) of the Uniform Guidance regarding obtaining three price or rate quotations for the purchase of goods between $10,000 and $22,500, and services between $10,000 and $250,000, or 4) Section 2 CFR 200.318(i) and Section 2CFR 200.320(c’) of the Uniform Guidance regarding the proper documentation required for noncompetitive procurement using federal funding. QUESTIONED COST: $490,823 RECOMMENDATION: I recommend that for all future purchases of goods and/or services utilizing federal funds, that the District adhere to the requirements of 1) the District’s Procurement Policy for Federal Programs, 2) the 24 PA Statute 8.807.1, 3) Section 2 CFR 200.318(i) of the Uniform Guidance regarding maintaining records sufficient to detail the history of procurement which includes rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price, 4) Section 2 CFR 200.300(a)(2)(i) of the Uniform Guidance regarding obtaining three price or rate quotations for the purchase of goods between $10,000 and $22,500, and services between $10,000 and $250,000, and as applicable, and 5) Section 2 CFR 200.318(i) and Section 2CFR 200.320(c’) of the Uniform Guidance regarding the proper documentation required for noncompetitive procurement using federal funding. VIEW OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS: See Correction Action Plan
CONDITION: During my review of Aliquippa School District’s compliance with the requirements of the Public School Code and the Uniform Guidance for procurement of goods and services, the District was unable to provide documentation or other evidence that 1) competitive bidding was performed for the purchases of goods or services over $22,500 and 2) a cost or price analysis for purchases in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold ($250,000), or 3) the vendor met the requirements of a ‘sole source provider’ with documentation to support such designation, for the following vendors –– Houghton Mifflin-Harcourt ($509,919), Beaver Valley Intermediate Unit ($419,826), and Smart Solutions ($449,303). CRITERIA: As specified in 2 CFR 200. 318(i) of the Uniform Guidance, the District must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. In addition, small purchase procedures per 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2)(i) for acquisitions between the micro-purchase threshold (currently $10,000) and the simplified acquisition threshold (current $250,000), price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate. Per 24 PA Statue 8.807.1, there should be three quotes that are either written or well documented. Furthermore, Section 2 CFR 200.320(c’) of the Uniform Guidance details five (5) circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. CAUSE: District officials responsible for federal procurement did not adhere to District, state and federal policies and regulations regarding the expenditure of federal funds. EFFECT: The District did not comply with 1) the District’s Procurement Policy for Federal Programs, 2) the 24 PA Statute 8.807.1, 3) Section 2 CFR 200.318(i) and Section 2CFR 200.320(c’) of the Uniform Guidance regarding the proper documentation required for noncompetitive procurement using federal funding, or 4) Section CFR 200.324(a) of the Uniform Guidance regarding the requirement to perform a cost or price analysis for purchases in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold ($250,000). QUESTIONED COST: $1,379,048 RECOMMENDATION: I recommend that for all future purchases of goods and/or services utilizing federal funds, that the District adhere to the requirements of 1) the District’s Procurement Policy for Federal Programs, 2) the 24 PA Statute 8.807.1, 3) Section 2 CFR 200.318(i) of the Uniform Guidance regarding maintaining records sufficient to detail the history of procurement which includes rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price, 4) Section 2 CFR 200.300(a)(2)(i) of the Uniform Guidance regarding obtaining three price or rate quotations for the purchase of goods between $10,000 and $22,500, and services between $10,000 and $250,000, and as applicable, 5) Section 2 CFR 200.318(i) and Section 2CFR 200.320(c’) of the Uniform Guidance regarding the proper documentation required for noncompetitive procurement using federal funding, and 5) Section CFR 200.324(a) of the Uniform Guidance regarding the requirement to perform a cost or price analysis for purchases in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold ($250,000). VIEW OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS: See Correction Action Plan
CONDITION: During my review of Aliquippa School District’s compliance with the requirements of the Public School Code and the Uniform Guidance for procurement of goods and services, the District was unable to provide documentation or other evidence that either 1) three price or rate quotations for the purchase of goods between $10,000 and $22,500, and services between $10,000 and $250,000 were obtained, 2) competitive bidding was performed for the purchases of goods over $22,500 or 3) the vendor met the requirements of a ‘sole source provider’ with documentation to support such designation, for the following vendors: Saving Ourselves ($30,000), AGI Repair ($16,216), IXL ($19,218), Learning Systems Associates LLC ($25,425), AGC Education Inc. ($11,644), Apple ($163,505), Germ Solutions LLC ($160,070), Graham Security ($12,025), Curriculum Designers, Inc. ($27,875), RJ Rhodes Transit, Inc. ($24,845). CRITERIA: As specified in 2 CFR 200 318(i) of the Uniform Guidance, the District must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. In addition, small purchase procedures per 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2)(i) for acquisitions between the micro-purchase threshold (currently $10,000) and the simplified acquisition threshold (current $250,000), price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate. Per 24 PA Statue 8.807.1, there should be three quotes that are either written or well documented and over $22,500 formal bidding procedures must be utilized. Furthermore, Section 2 CFR 200.320(c’) of the Uniform Guidance details five (5) circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. CAUSE: District officials responsible for federal procurement did not adhere to District, state and federal policies and regulations regarding the expenditure of federal funds. EFFECT: The District did not comply with 1) the District’s Procurement Policy for Federal Programs, 2) the 24 PA Statute 8.807.1, 3) Section 2 CFR 200.300(a)(2)(i) of the Uniform Guidance regarding obtaining three price or rate quotations for the purchase of goods between $10,000 and $22,500, and services between $10,000 and $250,000, or 4) Section 2 CFR 200.318(i) and Section 2CFR 200.320(c’) of the Uniform Guidance regarding the proper documentation required for noncompetitive procurement using federal funding. QUESTIONED COST: $490,823 RECOMMENDATION: I recommend that for all future purchases of goods and/or services utilizing federal funds, that the District adhere to the requirements of 1) the District’s Procurement Policy for Federal Programs, 2) the 24 PA Statute 8.807.1, 3) Section 2 CFR 200.318(i) of the Uniform Guidance regarding maintaining records sufficient to detail the history of procurement which includes rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price, 4) Section 2 CFR 200.300(a)(2)(i) of the Uniform Guidance regarding obtaining three price or rate quotations for the purchase of goods between $10,000 and $22,500, and services between $10,000 and $250,000, and as applicable, and 5) Section 2 CFR 200.318(i) and Section 2CFR 200.320(c’) of the Uniform Guidance regarding the proper documentation required for noncompetitive procurement using federal funding. VIEW OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS: See Correction Action Plan
CONDITION: During my review of Aliquippa School District’s compliance with the requirements of the Public School Code and the Uniform Guidance for procurement of goods and services, the District was unable to provide documentation or other evidence that 1) competitive bidding was performed for the purchases of goods or services over $22,500 and 2) a cost or price analysis for purchases in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold ($250,000), or 3) the vendor met the requirements of a ‘sole source provider’ with documentation to support such designation, for the following vendors –– Houghton Mifflin-Harcourt ($509,919), Beaver Valley Intermediate Unit ($419,826), and Smart Solutions ($449,303). CRITERIA: As specified in 2 CFR 200. 318(i) of the Uniform Guidance, the District must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. In addition, small purchase procedures per 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2)(i) for acquisitions between the micro-purchase threshold (currently $10,000) and the simplified acquisition threshold (current $250,000), price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate. Per 24 PA Statue 8.807.1, there should be three quotes that are either written or well documented. Furthermore, Section 2 CFR 200.320(c’) of the Uniform Guidance details five (5) circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. CAUSE: District officials responsible for federal procurement did not adhere to District, state and federal policies and regulations regarding the expenditure of federal funds. EFFECT: The District did not comply with 1) the District’s Procurement Policy for Federal Programs, 2) the 24 PA Statute 8.807.1, 3) Section 2 CFR 200.318(i) and Section 2CFR 200.320(c’) of the Uniform Guidance regarding the proper documentation required for noncompetitive procurement using federal funding, or 4) Section CFR 200.324(a) of the Uniform Guidance regarding the requirement to perform a cost or price analysis for purchases in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold ($250,000). QUESTIONED COST: $1,379,048 RECOMMENDATION: I recommend that for all future purchases of goods and/or services utilizing federal funds, that the District adhere to the requirements of 1) the District’s Procurement Policy for Federal Programs, 2) the 24 PA Statute 8.807.1, 3) Section 2 CFR 200.318(i) of the Uniform Guidance regarding maintaining records sufficient to detail the history of procurement which includes rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price, 4) Section 2 CFR 200.300(a)(2)(i) of the Uniform Guidance regarding obtaining three price or rate quotations for the purchase of goods between $10,000 and $22,500, and services between $10,000 and $250,000, and as applicable, 5) Section 2 CFR 200.318(i) and Section 2CFR 200.320(c’) of the Uniform Guidance regarding the proper documentation required for noncompetitive procurement using federal funding, and 5) Section CFR 200.324(a) of the Uniform Guidance regarding the requirement to perform a cost or price analysis for purchases in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold ($250,000). VIEW OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS: See Correction Action Plan
CONDITION: During my review of Aliquippa School District’s compliance with the requirements of the Public School Code and the Uniform Guidance for procurement of goods and services, the District was unable to provide documentation or other evidence that either 1) three price or rate quotations for the purchase of goods between $10,000 and $22,500, and services between $10,000 and $250,000 were obtained, 2) competitive bidding was performed for the purchases of goods over $22,500 or 3) the vendor met the requirements of a ‘sole source provider’ with documentation to support such designation, for the following vendors: Saving Ourselves ($30,000), AGI Repair ($16,216), IXL ($19,218), Learning Systems Associates LLC ($25,425), AGC Education Inc. ($11,644), Apple ($163,505), Germ Solutions LLC ($160,070), Graham Security ($12,025), Curriculum Designers, Inc. ($27,875), RJ Rhodes Transit, Inc. ($24,845). CRITERIA: As specified in 2 CFR 200 318(i) of the Uniform Guidance, the District must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. In addition, small purchase procedures per 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2)(i) for acquisitions between the micro-purchase threshold (currently $10,000) and the simplified acquisition threshold (current $250,000), price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate. Per 24 PA Statue 8.807.1, there should be three quotes that are either written or well documented and over $22,500 formal bidding procedures must be utilized. Furthermore, Section 2 CFR 200.320(c’) of the Uniform Guidance details five (5) circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. CAUSE: District officials responsible for federal procurement did not adhere to District, state and federal policies and regulations regarding the expenditure of federal funds. EFFECT: The District did not comply with 1) the District’s Procurement Policy for Federal Programs, 2) the 24 PA Statute 8.807.1, 3) Section 2 CFR 200.300(a)(2)(i) of the Uniform Guidance regarding obtaining three price or rate quotations for the purchase of goods between $10,000 and $22,500, and services between $10,000 and $250,000, or 4) Section 2 CFR 200.318(i) and Section 2CFR 200.320(c’) of the Uniform Guidance regarding the proper documentation required for noncompetitive procurement using federal funding. QUESTIONED COST: $490,823 RECOMMENDATION: I recommend that for all future purchases of goods and/or services utilizing federal funds, that the District adhere to the requirements of 1) the District’s Procurement Policy for Federal Programs, 2) the 24 PA Statute 8.807.1, 3) Section 2 CFR 200.318(i) of the Uniform Guidance regarding maintaining records sufficient to detail the history of procurement which includes rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price, 4) Section 2 CFR 200.300(a)(2)(i) of the Uniform Guidance regarding obtaining three price or rate quotations for the purchase of goods between $10,000 and $22,500, and services between $10,000 and $250,000, and as applicable, and 5) Section 2 CFR 200.318(i) and Section 2CFR 200.320(c’) of the Uniform Guidance regarding the proper documentation required for noncompetitive procurement using federal funding. VIEW OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS: See Correction Action Plan
CONDITION: During my review of Aliquippa School District’s compliance with the requirements of the Public School Code and the Uniform Guidance for procurement of goods and services, the District was unable to provide documentation or other evidence that 1) competitive bidding was performed for the purchases of goods or services over $22,500 and 2) a cost or price analysis for purchases in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold ($250,000), or 3) the vendor met the requirements of a ‘sole source provider’ with documentation to support such designation, for the following vendors –– Houghton Mifflin-Harcourt ($509,919), Beaver Valley Intermediate Unit ($419,826), and Smart Solutions ($449,303). CRITERIA: As specified in 2 CFR 200. 318(i) of the Uniform Guidance, the District must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. In addition, small purchase procedures per 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2)(i) for acquisitions between the micro-purchase threshold (currently $10,000) and the simplified acquisition threshold (current $250,000), price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate. Per 24 PA Statue 8.807.1, there should be three quotes that are either written or well documented. Furthermore, Section 2 CFR 200.320(c’) of the Uniform Guidance details five (5) circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. CAUSE: District officials responsible for federal procurement did not adhere to District, state and federal policies and regulations regarding the expenditure of federal funds. EFFECT: The District did not comply with 1) the District’s Procurement Policy for Federal Programs, 2) the 24 PA Statute 8.807.1, 3) Section 2 CFR 200.318(i) and Section 2CFR 200.320(c’) of the Uniform Guidance regarding the proper documentation required for noncompetitive procurement using federal funding, or 4) Section CFR 200.324(a) of the Uniform Guidance regarding the requirement to perform a cost or price analysis for purchases in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold ($250,000). QUESTIONED COST: $1,379,048 RECOMMENDATION: I recommend that for all future purchases of goods and/or services utilizing federal funds, that the District adhere to the requirements of 1) the District’s Procurement Policy for Federal Programs, 2) the 24 PA Statute 8.807.1, 3) Section 2 CFR 200.318(i) of the Uniform Guidance regarding maintaining records sufficient to detail the history of procurement which includes rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price, 4) Section 2 CFR 200.300(a)(2)(i) of the Uniform Guidance regarding obtaining three price or rate quotations for the purchase of goods between $10,000 and $22,500, and services between $10,000 and $250,000, and as applicable, 5) Section 2 CFR 200.318(i) and Section 2CFR 200.320(c’) of the Uniform Guidance regarding the proper documentation required for noncompetitive procurement using federal funding, and 5) Section CFR 200.324(a) of the Uniform Guidance regarding the requirement to perform a cost or price analysis for purchases in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold ($250,000). VIEW OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS: See Correction Action Plan
CONDITION: During my review of Aliquippa School District’s compliance with the requirements of the Public School Code and the Uniform Guidance for procurement of goods and services, the District was unable to provide documentation or other evidence that either 1) three price or rate quotations for the purchase of goods between $10,000 and $22,500, and services between $10,000 and $250,000 were obtained, 2) competitive bidding was performed for the purchases of goods over $22,500 or 3) the vendor met the requirements of a ‘sole source provider’ with documentation to support such designation, for the following vendors: Saving Ourselves ($30,000), AGI Repair ($16,216), IXL ($19,218), Learning Systems Associates LLC ($25,425), AGC Education Inc. ($11,644), Apple ($163,505), Germ Solutions LLC ($160,070), Graham Security ($12,025), Curriculum Designers, Inc. ($27,875), RJ Rhodes Transit, Inc. ($24,845). CRITERIA: As specified in 2 CFR 200 318(i) of the Uniform Guidance, the District must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. In addition, small purchase procedures per 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2)(i) for acquisitions between the micro-purchase threshold (currently $10,000) and the simplified acquisition threshold (current $250,000), price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate. Per 24 PA Statue 8.807.1, there should be three quotes that are either written or well documented and over $22,500 formal bidding procedures must be utilized. Furthermore, Section 2 CFR 200.320(c’) of the Uniform Guidance details five (5) circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. CAUSE: District officials responsible for federal procurement did not adhere to District, state and federal policies and regulations regarding the expenditure of federal funds. EFFECT: The District did not comply with 1) the District’s Procurement Policy for Federal Programs, 2) the 24 PA Statute 8.807.1, 3) Section 2 CFR 200.300(a)(2)(i) of the Uniform Guidance regarding obtaining three price or rate quotations for the purchase of goods between $10,000 and $22,500, and services between $10,000 and $250,000, or 4) Section 2 CFR 200.318(i) and Section 2CFR 200.320(c’) of the Uniform Guidance regarding the proper documentation required for noncompetitive procurement using federal funding. QUESTIONED COST: $490,823 RECOMMENDATION: I recommend that for all future purchases of goods and/or services utilizing federal funds, that the District adhere to the requirements of 1) the District’s Procurement Policy for Federal Programs, 2) the 24 PA Statute 8.807.1, 3) Section 2 CFR 200.318(i) of the Uniform Guidance regarding maintaining records sufficient to detail the history of procurement which includes rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price, 4) Section 2 CFR 200.300(a)(2)(i) of the Uniform Guidance regarding obtaining three price or rate quotations for the purchase of goods between $10,000 and $22,500, and services between $10,000 and $250,000, and as applicable, and 5) Section 2 CFR 200.318(i) and Section 2CFR 200.320(c’) of the Uniform Guidance regarding the proper documentation required for noncompetitive procurement using federal funding. VIEW OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS: See Correction Action Plan
CONDITION: During my review of Aliquippa School District’s compliance with the requirements of the Public School Code and the Uniform Guidance for procurement of goods and services, the District was unable to provide documentation or other evidence that 1) competitive bidding was performed for the purchases of goods or services over $22,500 and 2) a cost or price analysis for purchases in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold ($250,000), or 3) the vendor met the requirements of a ‘sole source provider’ with documentation to support such designation, for the following vendors –– Houghton Mifflin-Harcourt ($509,919), Beaver Valley Intermediate Unit ($419,826), and Smart Solutions ($449,303). CRITERIA: As specified in 2 CFR 200. 318(i) of the Uniform Guidance, the District must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. In addition, small purchase procedures per 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2)(i) for acquisitions between the micro-purchase threshold (currently $10,000) and the simplified acquisition threshold (current $250,000), price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate. Per 24 PA Statue 8.807.1, there should be three quotes that are either written or well documented. Furthermore, Section 2 CFR 200.320(c’) of the Uniform Guidance details five (5) circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. CAUSE: District officials responsible for federal procurement did not adhere to District, state and federal policies and regulations regarding the expenditure of federal funds. EFFECT: The District did not comply with 1) the District’s Procurement Policy for Federal Programs, 2) the 24 PA Statute 8.807.1, 3) Section 2 CFR 200.318(i) and Section 2CFR 200.320(c’) of the Uniform Guidance regarding the proper documentation required for noncompetitive procurement using federal funding, or 4) Section CFR 200.324(a) of the Uniform Guidance regarding the requirement to perform a cost or price analysis for purchases in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold ($250,000). QUESTIONED COST: $1,379,048 RECOMMENDATION: I recommend that for all future purchases of goods and/or services utilizing federal funds, that the District adhere to the requirements of 1) the District’s Procurement Policy for Federal Programs, 2) the 24 PA Statute 8.807.1, 3) Section 2 CFR 200.318(i) of the Uniform Guidance regarding maintaining records sufficient to detail the history of procurement which includes rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price, 4) Section 2 CFR 200.300(a)(2)(i) of the Uniform Guidance regarding obtaining three price or rate quotations for the purchase of goods between $10,000 and $22,500, and services between $10,000 and $250,000, and as applicable, 5) Section 2 CFR 200.318(i) and Section 2CFR 200.320(c’) of the Uniform Guidance regarding the proper documentation required for noncompetitive procurement using federal funding, and 5) Section CFR 200.324(a) of the Uniform Guidance regarding the requirement to perform a cost or price analysis for purchases in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold ($250,000). VIEW OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS: See Correction Action Plan
FINDING 2023-003 Information on the federal program: Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster – Internal Controls Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listing Number: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY2022, FY2023 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Finding: Significant Deficiency Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(a) states: "The non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable State, local, and tribal laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal law and the standards identified in this part." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal Entity must use one of the following methods of procurement. . . . (b) Procurement by small purchase procedures. Small purchase procedures are those relatively simple and informal procurement methods for securing services, supplies, or other property that do not cost more than the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. . . ." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement compliance requirements. Cause: The School Corporation's management had not developed a system of internal controls to ensure compliance with the compliance requirements listed above. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: For the two small purchase method procurements sampled for testing, we noted that the School Corporation, did not obtain three quotes from separate vendors. The School Corporation did properly perform a suspension and debarment check on the vendor. Additionally, no errors were noted in the one simplified acquisition threshold procurement sampled for testing. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit. The prior audit finding number was 2021-004. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls related to ensure that 3 quotes are obtained as required for small purchase method procurements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
FINDING 2023-003 Information on the federal program: Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster – Internal Controls Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listing Number: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY2022, FY2023 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Finding: Significant Deficiency Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(a) states: "The non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable State, local, and tribal laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal law and the standards identified in this part." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal Entity must use one of the following methods of procurement. . . . (b) Procurement by small purchase procedures. Small purchase procedures are those relatively simple and informal procurement methods for securing services, supplies, or other property that do not cost more than the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. . . ." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement compliance requirements. Cause: The School Corporation's management had not developed a system of internal controls to ensure compliance with the compliance requirements listed above. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: For the two small purchase method procurements sampled for testing, we noted that the School Corporation, did not obtain three quotes from separate vendors. The School Corporation did properly perform a suspension and debarment check on the vendor. Additionally, no errors were noted in the one simplified acquisition threshold procurement sampled for testing. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit. The prior audit finding number was 2021-004. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls related to ensure that 3 quotes are obtained as required for small purchase method procurements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
FINDING 2023-003 Information on the federal program: Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster – Internal Controls Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listing Number: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY2022, FY2023 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Finding: Significant Deficiency Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(a) states: "The non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable State, local, and tribal laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal law and the standards identified in this part." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal Entity must use one of the following methods of procurement. . . . (b) Procurement by small purchase procedures. Small purchase procedures are those relatively simple and informal procurement methods for securing services, supplies, or other property that do not cost more than the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. . . ." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement compliance requirements. Cause: The School Corporation's management had not developed a system of internal controls to ensure compliance with the compliance requirements listed above. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: For the two small purchase method procurements sampled for testing, we noted that the School Corporation, did not obtain three quotes from separate vendors. The School Corporation did properly perform a suspension and debarment check on the vendor. Additionally, no errors were noted in the one simplified acquisition threshold procurement sampled for testing. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit. The prior audit finding number was 2021-004. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls related to ensure that 3 quotes are obtained as required for small purchase method procurements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
FINDING 2023-003 Information on the federal program: Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster – Internal Controls Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listing Number: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY2022, FY2023 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Finding: Significant Deficiency Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(a) states: "The non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable State, local, and tribal laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal law and the standards identified in this part." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal Entity must use one of the following methods of procurement. . . . (b) Procurement by small purchase procedures. Small purchase procedures are those relatively simple and informal procurement methods for securing services, supplies, or other property that do not cost more than the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. . . ." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement compliance requirements. Cause: The School Corporation's management had not developed a system of internal controls to ensure compliance with the compliance requirements listed above. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: For the two small purchase method procurements sampled for testing, we noted that the School Corporation, did not obtain three quotes from separate vendors. The School Corporation did properly perform a suspension and debarment check on the vendor. Additionally, no errors were noted in the one simplified acquisition threshold procurement sampled for testing. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit. The prior audit finding number was 2021-004. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls related to ensure that 3 quotes are obtained as required for small purchase method procurements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
FINDING 2023-005 Information on the federal program: Subject: Special Education Cluster – Internal Controls Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listing Number: 84.027 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 20611-55-PN01, 21611-55-PN01, 22611-55-PN01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Finding: Significant Deficiency Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(a) states: "The non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable State, local, and tribal laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal law and the standards identified in this part." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal Entity must use one of the following methods of procurement. . . . (b) Procurement by small purchase procedures. Small purchase procedures are those relatively simple and informal procurement methods for securing services, supplies, or other property that do not cost more than the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. . . ." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement compliance requirements. Cause: The School Corporation's management had not developed a system of internal controls to ensure compliance with the compliance requirements listed above. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: For the three small purchase method procurements sampled for testing, we noted that the School Corporation, did not obtain quotes from 3 vendors. The three procurements were for $151,993 and $138,660 worth of behavioral health services for the years ended June 30, 2022, and June 30, 2023 respectively. The School Corporation did properly perform a suspension and debarment check on each vendor selected. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit. The prior audit finding number was 2021-005. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls related to ensure that 3 quotes are obtained as required for small purchase method procurements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
FINDING 2023-005 Information on the federal program: Subject: Special Education Cluster – Internal Controls Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listing Number: 84.027 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 20611-55-PN01, 21611-55-PN01, 22611-55-PN01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Finding: Significant Deficiency Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(a) states: "The non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable State, local, and tribal laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal law and the standards identified in this part." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal Entity must use one of the following methods of procurement. . . . (b) Procurement by small purchase procedures. Small purchase procedures are those relatively simple and informal procurement methods for securing services, supplies, or other property that do not cost more than the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. . . ." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement compliance requirements. Cause: The School Corporation's management had not developed a system of internal controls to ensure compliance with the compliance requirements listed above. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: For the three small purchase method procurements sampled for testing, we noted that the School Corporation, did not obtain quotes from 3 vendors. The three procurements were for $151,993 and $138,660 worth of behavioral health services for the years ended June 30, 2022, and June 30, 2023 respectively. The School Corporation did properly perform a suspension and debarment check on each vendor selected. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit. The prior audit finding number was 2021-005. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls related to ensure that 3 quotes are obtained as required for small purchase method procurements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
FINDING 2023-005 Information on the federal program: Subject: Special Education Cluster – Internal Controls Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listing Number: 84.027 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 20611-55-PN01, 21611-55-PN01, 22611-55-PN01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Finding: Significant Deficiency Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(a) states: "The non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable State, local, and tribal laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal law and the standards identified in this part." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal Entity must use one of the following methods of procurement. . . . (b) Procurement by small purchase procedures. Small purchase procedures are those relatively simple and informal procurement methods for securing services, supplies, or other property that do not cost more than the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. . . ." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement compliance requirements. Cause: The School Corporation's management had not developed a system of internal controls to ensure compliance with the compliance requirements listed above. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: For the three small purchase method procurements sampled for testing, we noted that the School Corporation, did not obtain quotes from 3 vendors. The three procurements were for $151,993 and $138,660 worth of behavioral health services for the years ended June 30, 2022, and June 30, 2023 respectively. The School Corporation did properly perform a suspension and debarment check on each vendor selected. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit. The prior audit finding number was 2021-005. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls related to ensure that 3 quotes are obtained as required for small purchase method procurements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
of Health and Human Services, Passed Through Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Section 223 Demonstration Programs to Improve Community Mental Health Services Listing 93.829, H79SM085287, 8/31/2022 – 8/30/2023 Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303(a) establishes that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides assurance that the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations and conditions of the federal award. 2 CFR 200.318(c)(1) provides that the auditee must maintain written standards of conduct covering conflicts of interest and governing the actions of its employees engaged in the selection, award, and administration of contracts. Federal regulations state that the auditee must have written procedures for procurement transactions. As outlined in 2 CFR 180, recipients must not utilize any vendor which is suspended or debarred or is otherwise excluded from the central contractor registry. Condition: Hope’s formally documented policy did not include many of the necessary procurement provisions until it was revised in February 2024. Expenditures under the federal grants did not have a consistent control in place to check applicable vendors for potential suspension and/or debarment for covered transactions, and controls were not documented to provide for a proper audit trail. Cause: For the year under audit, Hope did not have a consistent procurement process in place including all federal requirements or to check vendors under covered transactions ($25,000 or more) in accordance with federal regulations. Effect: Hope could be out of compliance with federal requirements when entering into procurement contracts as well as not meeting suspension and debarment requirements by potentially contracting with a suspended or debarred vendor. Questioned costs: None reported. Context: Procurement requirements were applicable to 1 vendor, which was selected for testing and was in excess of the micro-purchase threshold but were not in excess of $250,000. Suspension and Debarment requirements were applicable to both transactions for this vendor tested. Subsequent to year-end, Hope’s procurement policy has been updated. Repeat Finding From Prior Year: Yes Recommendation: This finding was noted in the prior year where the policy could not be put into place for the FY2023 audit procedures. We recognize that the policy has been updated and will be followed going forward. Views of Responsible Officials: We agree with the finding.
CONDITION: The School District of the City of Monessen contracted with a third-party vendor (TRANE) for the performance of a construction project at the District. The contract with the third-party vendor, which was procured through a cooperative purchasing group, exceeded the threshold for competitive procurement. The District was unable to provide documentation to verify that the third-party procurement contract was competitively procured, such as a bid evaluation and public solicitation. This is a repeat finding from the 2021-2022 fiscal year – Finding 2022-001. In addition, the District did not conduct a cost or price analysis for this procurement, which was in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold of $250,000. CRITERIA: 24 Pa. Statutes 751 of the Public School Code and Section 2 CFR 200.318(i) of the Uniform Guidance prescribes the bidding requirements for equipment, supplies, and work of any nature made by a school district whereby the cost exceeds certain dollar thresholds as adjusted annually for an inflation index. The construction project exceeded the simplified acquisition threshold of $250,000. As specified in 2 CFR 200. 318(i) of the Uniform Guidance, the District must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. In addition, Section 2 CFR 200.324(a) of the Uniform Guidance requires the performance of a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. CAUSE: School District personnel directly responsible for the oversight and execution of this contract interpreted that the requirements specified by 24 Pa. Statutes 751 of the Public School Code, and Sections 2 CFR 200.318(i) and 2 CFR 200.324(a) of the Uniform Guidance, would be met through the cooperative purchasing process based on an analysis of the documentation provided to them by the third-party vendor, however the District maintained no records internally to support this compliance. EFFECT: The School District of the City of Monessen did not comply with the requirements of 24 Pa. Statutes 751 of the Public School Code, and Sections 2 CFR 200.318(i) and 2 CFR 200.324(a) of the Uniform Guidance with regard to maintaining sufficient records to detail the history of procurement for the construction project and conducting a cost or price analysis for a procurement in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. QUESTIONED COST: $206,784 RECOMMENDATION: I am recommending that the management of the School District review and update as necessary its procurement policies to ensure retention of the appropriate procurement documentation, in all instances, including such instances whereby the District is using a contract vehicle from a cooperative purchase network so as to comply with all applicable sections of the Uniform Guidance, in specifically, Section 2 CFR 200.318(i) of the Uniform Guidance. In addition, I recommend that the School District conduct a cost or price analysis for all procurement in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold of $250,000 before receiving bids or proposals in accordance with Section 2 CFR 200.324(a) of the Uniform Guidance. VIEWS OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS: Management of the School District has reviewed the above noted finding and recommendation and have developed a corresponding ‘Corrective Action Plan’ to address this matter (See Corrective Action Plan).
CONDITION: The School District of the City of Monessen contracted with Johnson Controls for fire alarm upgrades, and Dagostino Electronic Services for the installation of exterior cameras. These contracts individually exceeded the Uniform Guidance micro purchase threshold of $10,000, but did not exceed the Simplified Acquisition Threshold of $250,000. The District was unable to 1) provide records sufficient to detail the history of procurement for these two contracts and 2) provide documentation to verify that price or rate quotations were obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. CRITERIA: 24 Pa. Statutes 8.807.1 and Section 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2)(i) of the Uniform Guidance prescribes the bidding requirements for equipment, supplies, and work of any nature made by a non-federal entity whereby the cost exceeds certain dollar thresholds as adjusted periodically. In instances where the cost incurred exceeds the Uniform Guidance micro purchase threshold of $10,000 but does not exceed the Simplified Acquisition Threshold of $250,000, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. In addition, as specified in 2 CFR 200. 318(i) of the Uniform Guidance, the District must maintain sufficient records to detail the history of procurement. CAUSE: School District personnel directly responsible for the oversight and execution of these contracts were not fully familiar with the procurement requirements as prescribed by 24 Pa. Statutes 8.807.1, and Sections 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2)(i) and 2 CFR 200.318(i) of the Uniform Guidance. EFFECT: The School District of the City of Monessen did not comply with the requirements of 24 Pa. Statutes 8.807.1, and Sections 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2)(i) and 2 CFR 200.318(i) of the Uniform Guidance with regard to maintaining sufficient records to detail the history of procurement and conducting a cost or price analysis for a procurement in instances where the procurement cost incurred for goods and/or services exceeds the Uniform Guidance micro purchase threshold of $10,000 but does not exceed the Simplified Acquisition Threshold of $250,000. QUESTIONED COST: $67,578 RECOMMENDATION: I am recommending that the management of the School District review and update as necessary its procurement policies to ensure In instances where the procurement cost incurred for goods and/or services exceeds the Uniform Guidance micro purchase threshold of $10,000 but does not exceed the Simplified Acquisition Threshold of $250,000, that 1) price or rate quotations are obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources, and 2) sufficient records are maintained to detail the history of procurement. These measures will enable the School District to comply with the procurement requirements as prescribed in 24 Pa. Statutes 8.807.1 and Section 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2)(i) of the Uniform Guidance. VIEWS OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS: Management of the School District has reviewed the above noted finding and recommendation and have developed a corresponding ‘Corrective Action Plan’ to address this matter (See Corrective Action Plan).
CONDITION: The School District of the City of Monessen contracted with a third-party vendor (TRANE) for the performance of a construction project at the District. The contract with the third-party vendor, which was procured through a cooperative purchasing group, exceeded the threshold for competitive procurement. The District was unable to provide documentation to verify that the third-party procurement contract was competitively procured, such as a bid evaluation and public solicitation. This is a repeat finding from the 2021-2022 fiscal year – Finding 2022-001. In addition, the District did not conduct a cost or price analysis for this procurement, which was in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold of $250,000. CRITERIA: 24 Pa. Statutes 751 of the Public School Code and Section 2 CFR 200.318(i) of the Uniform Guidance prescribes the bidding requirements for equipment, supplies, and work of any nature made by a school district whereby the cost exceeds certain dollar thresholds as adjusted annually for an inflation index. The construction project exceeded the simplified acquisition threshold of $250,000. As specified in 2 CFR 200. 318(i) of the Uniform Guidance, the District must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. In addition, Section 2 CFR 200.324(a) of the Uniform Guidance requires the performance of a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. CAUSE: School District personnel directly responsible for the oversight and execution of this contract interpreted that the requirements specified by 24 Pa. Statutes 751 of the Public School Code, and Sections 2 CFR 200.318(i) and 2 CFR 200.324(a) of the Uniform Guidance, would be met through the cooperative purchasing process based on an analysis of the documentation provided to them by the third-party vendor, however the District maintained no records internally to support this compliance. EFFECT: The School District of the City of Monessen did not comply with the requirements of 24 Pa. Statutes 751 of the Public School Code, and Sections 2 CFR 200.318(i) and 2 CFR 200.324(a) of the Uniform Guidance with regard to maintaining sufficient records to detail the history of procurement for the construction project and conducting a cost or price analysis for a procurement in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. QUESTIONED COST: $206,784 RECOMMENDATION: I am recommending that the management of the School District review and update as necessary its procurement policies to ensure retention of the appropriate procurement documentation, in all instances, including such instances whereby the District is using a contract vehicle from a cooperative purchase network so as to comply with all applicable sections of the Uniform Guidance, in specifically, Section 2 CFR 200.318(i) of the Uniform Guidance. In addition, I recommend that the School District conduct a cost or price analysis for all procurement in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold of $250,000 before receiving bids or proposals in accordance with Section 2 CFR 200.324(a) of the Uniform Guidance. VIEWS OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS: Management of the School District has reviewed the above noted finding and recommendation and have developed a corresponding ‘Corrective Action Plan’ to address this matter (See Corrective Action Plan).
CONDITION: The School District of the City of Monessen contracted with Johnson Controls for fire alarm upgrades, and Dagostino Electronic Services for the installation of exterior cameras. These contracts individually exceeded the Uniform Guidance micro purchase threshold of $10,000, but did not exceed the Simplified Acquisition Threshold of $250,000. The District was unable to 1) provide records sufficient to detail the history of procurement for these two contracts and 2) provide documentation to verify that price or rate quotations were obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. CRITERIA: 24 Pa. Statutes 8.807.1 and Section 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2)(i) of the Uniform Guidance prescribes the bidding requirements for equipment, supplies, and work of any nature made by a non-federal entity whereby the cost exceeds certain dollar thresholds as adjusted periodically. In instances where the cost incurred exceeds the Uniform Guidance micro purchase threshold of $10,000 but does not exceed the Simplified Acquisition Threshold of $250,000, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. In addition, as specified in 2 CFR 200. 318(i) of the Uniform Guidance, the District must maintain sufficient records to detail the history of procurement. CAUSE: School District personnel directly responsible for the oversight and execution of these contracts were not fully familiar with the procurement requirements as prescribed by 24 Pa. Statutes 8.807.1, and Sections 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2)(i) and 2 CFR 200.318(i) of the Uniform Guidance. EFFECT: The School District of the City of Monessen did not comply with the requirements of 24 Pa. Statutes 8.807.1, and Sections 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2)(i) and 2 CFR 200.318(i) of the Uniform Guidance with regard to maintaining sufficient records to detail the history of procurement and conducting a cost or price analysis for a procurement in instances where the procurement cost incurred for goods and/or services exceeds the Uniform Guidance micro purchase threshold of $10,000 but does not exceed the Simplified Acquisition Threshold of $250,000. QUESTIONED COST: $67,578 RECOMMENDATION: I am recommending that the management of the School District review and update as necessary its procurement policies to ensure In instances where the procurement cost incurred for goods and/or services exceeds the Uniform Guidance micro purchase threshold of $10,000 but does not exceed the Simplified Acquisition Threshold of $250,000, that 1) price or rate quotations are obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources, and 2) sufficient records are maintained to detail the history of procurement. These measures will enable the School District to comply with the procurement requirements as prescribed in 24 Pa. Statutes 8.807.1 and Section 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2)(i) of the Uniform Guidance. VIEWS OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS: Management of the School District has reviewed the above noted finding and recommendation and have developed a corresponding ‘Corrective Action Plan’ to address this matter (See Corrective Action Plan).
CONDITION: The School District of the City of Monessen contracted with a third-party vendor (TRANE) for the performance of a construction project at the District. The contract with the third-party vendor, which was procured through a cooperative purchasing group, exceeded the threshold for competitive procurement. The District was unable to provide documentation to verify that the third-party procurement contract was competitively procured, such as a bid evaluation and public solicitation. This is a repeat finding from the 2021-2022 fiscal year – Finding 2022-001. In addition, the District did not conduct a cost or price analysis for this procurement, which was in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold of $250,000. CRITERIA: 24 Pa. Statutes 751 of the Public School Code and Section 2 CFR 200.318(i) of the Uniform Guidance prescribes the bidding requirements for equipment, supplies, and work of any nature made by a school district whereby the cost exceeds certain dollar thresholds as adjusted annually for an inflation index. The construction project exceeded the simplified acquisition threshold of $250,000. As specified in 2 CFR 200. 318(i) of the Uniform Guidance, the District must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. In addition, Section 2 CFR 200.324(a) of the Uniform Guidance requires the performance of a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. CAUSE: School District personnel directly responsible for the oversight and execution of this contract interpreted that the requirements specified by 24 Pa. Statutes 751 of the Public School Code, and Sections 2 CFR 200.318(i) and 2 CFR 200.324(a) of the Uniform Guidance, would be met through the cooperative purchasing process based on an analysis of the documentation provided to them by the third-party vendor, however the District maintained no records internally to support this compliance. EFFECT: The School District of the City of Monessen did not comply with the requirements of 24 Pa. Statutes 751 of the Public School Code, and Sections 2 CFR 200.318(i) and 2 CFR 200.324(a) of the Uniform Guidance with regard to maintaining sufficient records to detail the history of procurement for the construction project and conducting a cost or price analysis for a procurement in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. QUESTIONED COST: $206,784 RECOMMENDATION: I am recommending that the management of the School District review and update as necessary its procurement policies to ensure retention of the appropriate procurement documentation, in all instances, including such instances whereby the District is using a contract vehicle from a cooperative purchase network so as to comply with all applicable sections of the Uniform Guidance, in specifically, Section 2 CFR 200.318(i) of the Uniform Guidance. In addition, I recommend that the School District conduct a cost or price analysis for all procurement in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold of $250,000 before receiving bids or proposals in accordance with Section 2 CFR 200.324(a) of the Uniform Guidance. VIEWS OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS: Management of the School District has reviewed the above noted finding and recommendation and have developed a corresponding ‘Corrective Action Plan’ to address this matter (See Corrective Action Plan).
CONDITION: The School District of the City of Monessen contracted with Johnson Controls for fire alarm upgrades, and Dagostino Electronic Services for the installation of exterior cameras. These contracts individually exceeded the Uniform Guidance micro purchase threshold of $10,000, but did not exceed the Simplified Acquisition Threshold of $250,000. The District was unable to 1) provide records sufficient to detail the history of procurement for these two contracts and 2) provide documentation to verify that price or rate quotations were obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. CRITERIA: 24 Pa. Statutes 8.807.1 and Section 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2)(i) of the Uniform Guidance prescribes the bidding requirements for equipment, supplies, and work of any nature made by a non-federal entity whereby the cost exceeds certain dollar thresholds as adjusted periodically. In instances where the cost incurred exceeds the Uniform Guidance micro purchase threshold of $10,000 but does not exceed the Simplified Acquisition Threshold of $250,000, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. In addition, as specified in 2 CFR 200. 318(i) of the Uniform Guidance, the District must maintain sufficient records to detail the history of procurement. CAUSE: School District personnel directly responsible for the oversight and execution of these contracts were not fully familiar with the procurement requirements as prescribed by 24 Pa. Statutes 8.807.1, and Sections 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2)(i) and 2 CFR 200.318(i) of the Uniform Guidance. EFFECT: The School District of the City of Monessen did not comply with the requirements of 24 Pa. Statutes 8.807.1, and Sections 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2)(i) and 2 CFR 200.318(i) of the Uniform Guidance with regard to maintaining sufficient records to detail the history of procurement and conducting a cost or price analysis for a procurement in instances where the procurement cost incurred for goods and/or services exceeds the Uniform Guidance micro purchase threshold of $10,000 but does not exceed the Simplified Acquisition Threshold of $250,000. QUESTIONED COST: $67,578 RECOMMENDATION: I am recommending that the management of the School District review and update as necessary its procurement policies to ensure In instances where the procurement cost incurred for goods and/or services exceeds the Uniform Guidance micro purchase threshold of $10,000 but does not exceed the Simplified Acquisition Threshold of $250,000, that 1) price or rate quotations are obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources, and 2) sufficient records are maintained to detail the history of procurement. These measures will enable the School District to comply with the procurement requirements as prescribed in 24 Pa. Statutes 8.807.1 and Section 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2)(i) of the Uniform Guidance. VIEWS OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS: Management of the School District has reviewed the above noted finding and recommendation and have developed a corresponding ‘Corrective Action Plan’ to address this matter (See Corrective Action Plan).
CONDITION: The School District of the City of Monessen contracted with a third-party vendor (TRANE) for the performance of a construction project at the District. The contract with the third-party vendor, which was procured through a cooperative purchasing group, exceeded the threshold for competitive procurement. The District was unable to provide documentation to verify that the third-party procurement contract was competitively procured, such as a bid evaluation and public solicitation. This is a repeat finding from the 2021-2022 fiscal year – Finding 2022-001. In addition, the District did not conduct a cost or price analysis for this procurement, which was in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold of $250,000. CRITERIA: 24 Pa. Statutes 751 of the Public School Code and Section 2 CFR 200.318(i) of the Uniform Guidance prescribes the bidding requirements for equipment, supplies, and work of any nature made by a school district whereby the cost exceeds certain dollar thresholds as adjusted annually for an inflation index. The construction project exceeded the simplified acquisition threshold of $250,000. As specified in 2 CFR 200. 318(i) of the Uniform Guidance, the District must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. In addition, Section 2 CFR 200.324(a) of the Uniform Guidance requires the performance of a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. CAUSE: School District personnel directly responsible for the oversight and execution of this contract interpreted that the requirements specified by 24 Pa. Statutes 751 of the Public School Code, and Sections 2 CFR 200.318(i) and 2 CFR 200.324(a) of the Uniform Guidance, would be met through the cooperative purchasing process based on an analysis of the documentation provided to them by the third-party vendor, however the District maintained no records internally to support this compliance. EFFECT: The School District of the City of Monessen did not comply with the requirements of 24 Pa. Statutes 751 of the Public School Code, and Sections 2 CFR 200.318(i) and 2 CFR 200.324(a) of the Uniform Guidance with regard to maintaining sufficient records to detail the history of procurement for the construction project and conducting a cost or price analysis for a procurement in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. QUESTIONED COST: $206,784 RECOMMENDATION: I am recommending that the management of the School District review and update as necessary its procurement policies to ensure retention of the appropriate procurement documentation, in all instances, including such instances whereby the District is using a contract vehicle from a cooperative purchase network so as to comply with all applicable sections of the Uniform Guidance, in specifically, Section 2 CFR 200.318(i) of the Uniform Guidance. In addition, I recommend that the School District conduct a cost or price analysis for all procurement in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold of $250,000 before receiving bids or proposals in accordance with Section 2 CFR 200.324(a) of the Uniform Guidance. VIEWS OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS: Management of the School District has reviewed the above noted finding and recommendation and have developed a corresponding ‘Corrective Action Plan’ to address this matter (See Corrective Action Plan).
CONDITION: The School District of the City of Monessen contracted with Johnson Controls for fire alarm upgrades, and Dagostino Electronic Services for the installation of exterior cameras. These contracts individually exceeded the Uniform Guidance micro purchase threshold of $10,000, but did not exceed the Simplified Acquisition Threshold of $250,000. The District was unable to 1) provide records sufficient to detail the history of procurement for these two contracts and 2) provide documentation to verify that price or rate quotations were obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. CRITERIA: 24 Pa. Statutes 8.807.1 and Section 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2)(i) of the Uniform Guidance prescribes the bidding requirements for equipment, supplies, and work of any nature made by a non-federal entity whereby the cost exceeds certain dollar thresholds as adjusted periodically. In instances where the cost incurred exceeds the Uniform Guidance micro purchase threshold of $10,000 but does not exceed the Simplified Acquisition Threshold of $250,000, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. In addition, as specified in 2 CFR 200. 318(i) of the Uniform Guidance, the District must maintain sufficient records to detail the history of procurement. CAUSE: School District personnel directly responsible for the oversight and execution of these contracts were not fully familiar with the procurement requirements as prescribed by 24 Pa. Statutes 8.807.1, and Sections 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2)(i) and 2 CFR 200.318(i) of the Uniform Guidance. EFFECT: The School District of the City of Monessen did not comply with the requirements of 24 Pa. Statutes 8.807.1, and Sections 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2)(i) and 2 CFR 200.318(i) of the Uniform Guidance with regard to maintaining sufficient records to detail the history of procurement and conducting a cost or price analysis for a procurement in instances where the procurement cost incurred for goods and/or services exceeds the Uniform Guidance micro purchase threshold of $10,000 but does not exceed the Simplified Acquisition Threshold of $250,000. QUESTIONED COST: $67,578 RECOMMENDATION: I am recommending that the management of the School District review and update as necessary its procurement policies to ensure In instances where the procurement cost incurred for goods and/or services exceeds the Uniform Guidance micro purchase threshold of $10,000 but does not exceed the Simplified Acquisition Threshold of $250,000, that 1) price or rate quotations are obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources, and 2) sufficient records are maintained to detail the history of procurement. These measures will enable the School District to comply with the procurement requirements as prescribed in 24 Pa. Statutes 8.807.1 and Section 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2)(i) of the Uniform Guidance. VIEWS OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS: Management of the School District has reviewed the above noted finding and recommendation and have developed a corresponding ‘Corrective Action Plan’ to address this matter (See Corrective Action Plan).
NONCOMPLIANCE WITH PROCUREMENT, SUSPENSION & DEBARMENT REQUIREMENTS, CORONAVIRUS STATE AND LOCAL FISCAL RECOVERY FUNDS, AL No. 21.027 Criteria: Per section 13 of Treasury’s Final Rule FAQs and 2 CFR 200.214, counties must comply with the procurement standards set forth in 2 CFR 200.318, through 2 CFR 200.327, when using their SLFRF award funds to procure goods and services to carry out the objectives of their SLFRF award. In addition, 2 CFR 200.214, prohibits recipients from using SLFRF funds to enter into subawards and contracts with parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs. Condition: The county did not verify that program recipients/participants were not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from participation in the program. Cause: The county does not have procurement policies and procedures in place that allow it to comply with procurement standards outlined in the Uniform Guidance. Effect: Non-compliance with program terms and conditions. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation: Management should develop procedures that will provide reasonable assurance that procurement of goods and services are made in compliance with applicable federal regulations and other procurement requirements specific to a federal award or subaward, and that no subaward, contract, or agreement for purchase of goods or services is made with any suspended or debarred party. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective action: The government agrees with this finding and will adhere to the attached corrective action plan.
Federal Agency: United States Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program: Grant for New and Expanded Services under the Health Center Program Federal Assistance Listing Number 93.527 Federal Award Year: 2022-2023 Criteria or specific requirement – Procurement (2 CFR 200.318) The recipient or subrecipient must maintain and use documented procedures for procurement transactions under a Federal award or subaward, including for acquisition of property or services. Condition – The Organization was unable to provide evidence it was in compliance with its procurement policy. Records sufficient to detail the history of procurement including the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price were not retained. Cause – The Organization did not have adequate controls and procedures in place relating to procurement under the Uniform Guidance. Effect or Potential Effect – The Organization could not support that it complied with its procurement policy as required records were not maintained. Purchases of goods or services were made that may not have been obtained in the most effective manner or in compliance with Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs – None Context – The Organization does not have appropriate controls in place to ensure procurement procedures are being appropriately documented and that its policies are compliant with the Uniform Guidance. Four of 22 purchases over $5,000 were selected for testing, and documentation was not maintained to support that procurement procedures were followed. The sampling methodology used is not, and is not intended to be, statistically valid. Identification as a Repeat Finding– Not a repeat finding. Recommendation – The Organization should incorporate internal controls over compliance with the procurement compliance requirement, including reviewing its procurement policy for compliance with Uniform Guidanc including documentation requirements and record retention policies. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions – Management acknowledges the audit finding related to procurement compliance under Federal Program Grant for New and Expanded Services under the Health Center Program (Federal Assistance Listing Number 93.527; Federal Award Year 2022-2023). We are committed to implementing corrective measures to address the identified deficiencies and ensure full compliance with 2 CFR 200.318 regulations. Corrective Actions Taken: 1. Established & Implemented Detailed Record-Keeping for Procurement Transactions: - A new accounting system with a centralized procurement tracking system has been implemented and is currently being used. Bill.com is used to record vendor invoices and procurement transactions in real time and syncs with Sage Intacct, the new accounting software implemented in January 2024. - Detailed records of all federal grant expenditures are maintained in Bill.com and monthly reconciliations are conducted in the general ledger to ensure all procurement transactions are properly classified to their specific grant by their grant ID. We believe that these actions will significantly mitigate the risks associated with the identified conditions and strengthen our internal control environment and align our practices with federal regulations.
Federal Agency: United States Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program: Grant for New and Expanded Services under the Health Center Program Federal Assistance Listing Number 93.527 Federal Award Year: 2022-2023 Criteria or specific requirement – Procurement (2 CFR 200.318) The recipient or subrecipient must maintain and use documented procedures for procurement transactions under a Federal award or subaward, including for acquisition of property or services. Condition – The Organization was unable to provide evidence it was in compliance with its procurement policy. Records sufficient to detail the history of procurement including the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price were not retained. Cause – The Organization did not have adequate controls and procedures in place relating to procurement under the Uniform Guidance. Effect or Potential Effect – The Organization could not support that it complied with its procurement policy as required records were not maintained. Purchases of goods or services were made that may not have been obtained in the most effective manner or in compliance with Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs – None Context – The Organization does not have appropriate controls in place to ensure procurement procedures are being appropriately documented and that its policies are compliant with the Uniform Guidance. Four of 22 purchases over $5,000 were selected for testing, and documentation was not maintained to support that procurement procedures were followed. The sampling methodology used is not, and is not intended to be, statistically valid. Identification as a Repeat Finding– Not a repeat finding. Recommendation – The Organization should incorporate internal controls over compliance with the procurement compliance requirement, including reviewing its procurement policy for compliance with Uniform Guidanc including documentation requirements and record retention policies. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions – Management acknowledges the audit finding related to procurement compliance under Federal Program Grant for New and Expanded Services under the Health Center Program (Federal Assistance Listing Number 93.527; Federal Award Year 2022-2023). We are committed to implementing corrective measures to address the identified deficiencies and ensure full compliance with 2 CFR 200.318 regulations. Corrective Actions Taken: 1. Established & Implemented Detailed Record-Keeping for Procurement Transactions: - A new accounting system with a centralized procurement tracking system has been implemented and is currently being used. Bill.com is used to record vendor invoices and procurement transactions in real time and syncs with Sage Intacct, the new accounting software implemented in January 2024. - Detailed records of all federal grant expenditures are maintained in Bill.com and monthly reconciliations are conducted in the general ledger to ensure all procurement transactions are properly classified to their specific grant by their grant ID. We believe that these actions will significantly mitigate the risks associated with the identified conditions and strengthen our internal control environment and align our practices with federal regulations.
2023-006 — Procurement – Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance and Noncompliance (Repeat of Finding 2022-004) Federal program information: Funding agencies: U.S. Department of Interior and U.S. Department of Education Titles: Assistance to Tribally Controlled Community Colleges; Higher Education Institutional Aid; and Education Stabilization Fund ALN Number: 15.027, 84.031, and 84.425 Award years: Various Criteria: According to 2 CFR Section 200.318i, the recipient or subrecipient must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of each procurement transaction. These records must include the rationale for the procurement method, contract type selection, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. According to 2 CFR Section 0200.319a, all procurement transactions under the federal award must be conducted in a manner that provides full and open competition. Condition: The College did not maintain records sufficient to detail the history of each procurement transaction for the nine procurements contracts tested. Cause: The College did not have sufficient procedures in place to ensure that procurement records are maintained. Effect: The College is not in compliance with procurement requirements. Questioned Costs: None Context: Procurement documents were not retained for nine out of nine transactions tested. Recommendation: Formally document and enforce policies and procedures that will promote adequate monitoring of the procurement and bidding process. Ensure that any contract over the College’s threshold ($150,000) follow the sealed bid requirements listed in 2 CFR Section 200.320b1. Management’s Response: The College concurs with this finding.
2023-006 — Procurement – Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance and Noncompliance (Repeat of Finding 2022-004) Federal program information: Funding agencies: U.S. Department of Interior and U.S. Department of Education Titles: Assistance to Tribally Controlled Community Colleges; Higher Education Institutional Aid; and Education Stabilization Fund ALN Number: 15.027, 84.031, and 84.425 Award years: Various Criteria: According to 2 CFR Section 200.318i, the recipient or subrecipient must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of each procurement transaction. These records must include the rationale for the procurement method, contract type selection, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. According to 2 CFR Section 0200.319a, all procurement transactions under the federal award must be conducted in a manner that provides full and open competition. Condition: The College did not maintain records sufficient to detail the history of each procurement transaction for the nine procurements contracts tested. Cause: The College did not have sufficient procedures in place to ensure that procurement records are maintained. Effect: The College is not in compliance with procurement requirements. Questioned Costs: None Context: Procurement documents were not retained for nine out of nine transactions tested. Recommendation: Formally document and enforce policies and procedures that will promote adequate monitoring of the procurement and bidding process. Ensure that any contract over the College’s threshold ($150,000) follow the sealed bid requirements listed in 2 CFR Section 200.320b1. Management’s Response: The College concurs with this finding.
2023-006 — Procurement – Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance and Noncompliance (Repeat of Finding 2022-004) Federal program information: Funding agencies: U.S. Department of Interior and U.S. Department of Education Titles: Assistance to Tribally Controlled Community Colleges; Higher Education Institutional Aid; and Education Stabilization Fund ALN Number: 15.027, 84.031, and 84.425 Award years: Various Criteria: According to 2 CFR Section 200.318i, the recipient or subrecipient must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of each procurement transaction. These records must include the rationale for the procurement method, contract type selection, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. According to 2 CFR Section 0200.319a, all procurement transactions under the federal award must be conducted in a manner that provides full and open competition. Condition: The College did not maintain records sufficient to detail the history of each procurement transaction for the nine procurements contracts tested. Cause: The College did not have sufficient procedures in place to ensure that procurement records are maintained. Effect: The College is not in compliance with procurement requirements. Questioned Costs: None Context: Procurement documents were not retained for nine out of nine transactions tested. Recommendation: Formally document and enforce policies and procedures that will promote adequate monitoring of the procurement and bidding process. Ensure that any contract over the College’s threshold ($150,000) follow the sealed bid requirements listed in 2 CFR Section 200.320b1. Management’s Response: The College concurs with this finding.
2023-006 — Procurement – Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance and Noncompliance (Repeat of Finding 2022-004) Federal program information: Funding agencies: U.S. Department of Interior and U.S. Department of Education Titles: Assistance to Tribally Controlled Community Colleges; Higher Education Institutional Aid; and Education Stabilization Fund ALN Number: 15.027, 84.031, and 84.425 Award years: Various Criteria: According to 2 CFR Section 200.318i, the recipient or subrecipient must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of each procurement transaction. These records must include the rationale for the procurement method, contract type selection, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. According to 2 CFR Section 0200.319a, all procurement transactions under the federal award must be conducted in a manner that provides full and open competition. Condition: The College did not maintain records sufficient to detail the history of each procurement transaction for the nine procurements contracts tested. Cause: The College did not have sufficient procedures in place to ensure that procurement records are maintained. Effect: The College is not in compliance with procurement requirements. Questioned Costs: None Context: Procurement documents were not retained for nine out of nine transactions tested. Recommendation: Formally document and enforce policies and procedures that will promote adequate monitoring of the procurement and bidding process. Ensure that any contract over the College’s threshold ($150,000) follow the sealed bid requirements listed in 2 CFR Section 200.320b1. Management’s Response: The College concurs with this finding.
2023-006 — Procurement – Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance and Noncompliance (Repeat of Finding 2022-004) Federal program information: Funding agencies: U.S. Department of Interior and U.S. Department of Education Titles: Assistance to Tribally Controlled Community Colleges; Higher Education Institutional Aid; and Education Stabilization Fund ALN Number: 15.027, 84.031, and 84.425 Award years: Various Criteria: According to 2 CFR Section 200.318i, the recipient or subrecipient must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of each procurement transaction. These records must include the rationale for the procurement method, contract type selection, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. According to 2 CFR Section 0200.319a, all procurement transactions under the federal award must be conducted in a manner that provides full and open competition. Condition: The College did not maintain records sufficient to detail the history of each procurement transaction for the nine procurements contracts tested. Cause: The College did not have sufficient procedures in place to ensure that procurement records are maintained. Effect: The College is not in compliance with procurement requirements. Questioned Costs: None Context: Procurement documents were not retained for nine out of nine transactions tested. Recommendation: Formally document and enforce policies and procedures that will promote adequate monitoring of the procurement and bidding process. Ensure that any contract over the College’s threshold ($150,000) follow the sealed bid requirements listed in 2 CFR Section 200.320b1. Management’s Response: The College concurs with this finding.
2023-006 — Procurement – Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance and Noncompliance (Repeat of Finding 2022-004) Federal program information: Funding agencies: U.S. Department of Interior and U.S. Department of Education Titles: Assistance to Tribally Controlled Community Colleges; Higher Education Institutional Aid; and Education Stabilization Fund ALN Number: 15.027, 84.031, and 84.425 Award years: Various Criteria: According to 2 CFR Section 200.318i, the recipient or subrecipient must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of each procurement transaction. These records must include the rationale for the procurement method, contract type selection, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. According to 2 CFR Section 0200.319a, all procurement transactions under the federal award must be conducted in a manner that provides full and open competition. Condition: The College did not maintain records sufficient to detail the history of each procurement transaction for the nine procurements contracts tested. Cause: The College did not have sufficient procedures in place to ensure that procurement records are maintained. Effect: The College is not in compliance with procurement requirements. Questioned Costs: None Context: Procurement documents were not retained for nine out of nine transactions tested. Recommendation: Formally document and enforce policies and procedures that will promote adequate monitoring of the procurement and bidding process. Ensure that any contract over the College’s threshold ($150,000) follow the sealed bid requirements listed in 2 CFR Section 200.320b1. Management’s Response: The College concurs with this finding.