NONCOMPLIANCE WITH PROCUREMENT, SUSPENSION & DEBARMENT REQUIREMENTS, CORONAVIRUS STATE AND LOCAL FISCAL RECOVERY FUNDS; AL No. 21.027; GRANT No. Direct and AM-23-0287 Criteria: Per section 13 of Treasury’s Final Rule FAQs and 2 CFR 200.214, counties must comply with the procurement standards set forth in 2 CFR 200.318, through 2 CFR 200.327, when using their SLFRF award funds to procure goods and services to carry out the objectives of their SLFRF award. In addition, 2 CFR 200.214, prohibits recipients from using SLFRF funds to enter into subawards and contracts with parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs. Condition: The city did not verify that program recipients/participants were not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from participation in the program. Cause: The city does not have procurement policies and procedures in place that allow it to comply with procurement standards outlined in the Uniform Guidance. Effect: Non-compliance with program terms and conditions. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation: Management should develop procedures that will provide reasonable assurance that procurement of goods and services are made in compliance with applicable federal regulations and other procurement requirements specific to a federal award or subaward, and that no subaward, contract, or agreement for purchase of goods or services is made with any suspended or debarred party. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective action: The government agrees with this finding and will adhere to the attached corrective action plan.
NONCOMPLIANCE WITH PROCUREMENT, SUSPENSION & DEBARMENT REQUIREMENTS, CORONAVIRUS STATE AND LOCAL FISCAL RECOVERY FUNDS; AL No. 21.027; GRANT No. Direct and AM-23-0287 Criteria: Per section 13 of Treasury’s Final Rule FAQs and 2 CFR 200.214, counties must comply with the procurement standards set forth in 2 CFR 200.318, through 2 CFR 200.327, when using their SLFRF award funds to procure goods and services to carry out the objectives of their SLFRF award. In addition, 2 CFR 200.214, prohibits recipients from using SLFRF funds to enter into subawards and contracts with parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs. Condition: The city did not verify that program recipients/participants were not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from participation in the program. Cause: The city does not have procurement policies and procedures in place that allow it to comply with procurement standards outlined in the Uniform Guidance. Effect: Non-compliance with program terms and conditions. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation: Management should develop procedures that will provide reasonable assurance that procurement of goods and services are made in compliance with applicable federal regulations and other procurement requirements specific to a federal award or subaward, and that no subaward, contract, or agreement for purchase of goods or services is made with any suspended or debarred party. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective action: The government agrees with this finding and will adhere to the attached corrective action plan.
NONCOMPLIANCE WITH PROCUREMENT, SUSPENSION & DEBARMENT REQUIREMENTS, CORONAVIRUS STATE AND LOCAL FISCAL RECOVERY FUNDS; AL No. 21.027, YEAR ENDED JUNE 30 2023 Criteria: Per section 13 of Treasury’s Final Rule FAQs and 2 CFR 200.214, counties must comply with the procurement standards set forth in 2 CFR 200.318, through 2 CFR 200.327, when using their SLFRF award funds to procure goods and services to carry out the objectives of their SLFRF award. In addition, 2 CFR 200.214, prohibits recipients from using SLFRF funds to enter into subawards and contracts with parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs. Condition 1: The county did not verify that program recipients/participants were not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from participation in the program. Condition 2: The county did not formally bid a water and sewer line extension project at the fairgrounds as required by federal procurement standards established in 2 CFR 300.19. Cause: The county does not have procurement policies and procedures in place that allows it to comply with procurement standards outlined in the Uniform Guidance. Effect: Non-compliance with program terms and conditions. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation: Management should develop procedures that will provide reasonable assurance that procurement of goods and services are made in compliance with applicable federal regulations and other procurement requirements specific to a federal award or subaward, and that no subaward, contract, or agreement for purchase of goods or services is made with any suspended or debarred party. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective action: The government agrees with this finding and will adhere to the attached corrective action plan.
NONCOMPLIANCE WITH PROCUREMENT, SUSPENSION & DEBARMENT REQUIREMENTS, CORONAVIRUS STATE AND LOCAL FISCAL RECOVERY FUNDS; AL No. 21.027, YEAR ENDED JUNE 30 2023 Criteria: Per section 13 of Treasury’s Final Rule FAQs and 2 CFR 200.214, counties must comply with the procurement standards set forth in 2 CFR 200.318, through 2 CFR 200.327, when using their SLFRF award funds to procure goods and services to carry out the objectives of their SLFRF award. In addition, 2 CFR 200.214, prohibits recipients from using SLFRF funds to enter into subawards and contracts with parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs. Condition 1: The county did not verify that program recipients/participants were not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from participation in the program. Condition 2: The county did not formally bid a water and sewer line extension project at the fairgrounds as required by federal procurement standards established in 2 CFR 300.19. Cause: The county does not have procurement policies and procedures in place that allows it to comply with procurement standards outlined in the Uniform Guidance. Effect: Non-compliance with program terms and conditions. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation: Management should develop procedures that will provide reasonable assurance that procurement of goods and services are made in compliance with applicable federal regulations and other procurement requirements specific to a federal award or subaward, and that no subaward, contract, or agreement for purchase of goods or services is made with any suspended or debarred party. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective action: The government agrees with this finding and will adhere to the attached corrective action plan.
NONCOMPLIANCE WITH PROCUREMENT, SUSPENSION & DEBARMENT REQUIREMENTS, CORONAVIRUS STATE AND LOCAL FISCAL RECOVERY FUNDS; AL No. 21.027, YEAR ENDED JUNE 30 2023 Criteria: Per section 13 of Treasury’s Final Rule FAQs and 2 CFR 200.214, counties must comply with the procurement standards set forth in 2 CFR 200.318, through 2 CFR 200.327, when using their SLFRF award funds to procure goods and services to carry out the objectives of their SLFRF award. In addition, 2 CFR 200.214, prohibits recipients from using SLFRF funds to enter into subawards and contracts with parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs. Condition 1: The county did not verify that program recipients/participants were not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from participation in the program. Condition 2: The county did not formally bid a water and sewer line extension project at the fairgrounds as required by federal procurement standards established in 2 CFR 300.19. Cause: The county does not have procurement policies and procedures in place that allows it to comply with procurement standards outlined in the Uniform Guidance. Effect: Non-compliance with program terms and conditions. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation: Management should develop procedures that will provide reasonable assurance that procurement of goods and services are made in compliance with applicable federal regulations and other procurement requirements specific to a federal award or subaward, and that no subaward, contract, or agreement for purchase of goods or services is made with any suspended or debarred party. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective action: The government agrees with this finding and will adhere to the attached corrective action plan.
Federal agency: U.S. Department of Education Federal program name: Special Education Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 84.027 and 84.173 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: H027A220087, 2023 Pass-Through Agency: Minnesota Department of Education Pass-Through Number: H027A190087 Award Period: Fiscal year 2023 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Material Noncompliance (Modified Opinion) Criteria or specific requirement: Non-federal entities other than states must follow the procurement standards set out at CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. This includes utilizing one of the five allowable procurement methods, including small purchase guidelines for items over the micro-purchase threshold and sealed bids, competitive proposals, or noncompetitive proposals when items exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. In addition, the Uniform Guidance requires that the entity maintain records sufficient to detail the history of the procurement. 2 CFR 200.303 requires that the entity have sufficient controls over compliance related to federal awards. Condition: During our testing of the District’s procurements within the Special Education program, it was noted that not all procurements followed the appropriate method and history of the transaction was not sufficiently documented. Questioned Costs: ALN 84.027 - $38,869 Context: Out of five procurement which were tested, we noted two of them for which the District did not retain documentation detailing the history of the procurement, including the rationale for choosing the particular vendor. Cause: The District during the pandemic and thereafter, was not able to properly ensure all contracts has procurement documentation retained and performed as required by the Uniform Guidance. Effect: The District was not in compliance with Uniform Guidance requirements for the proper documentation of all procurement transactions. Repeat Finding: Yes, 2022-004. Recommendation: We recommend the District reviews its procedures and controls over procurement to ensure that all procurements are documented such that a third party can clearly see and understand the detailed history of the procurement. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Federal agency: U.S. Department of Education Federal program name: Special Education Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 84.027 and 84.173 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: H027A220087, 2023 Pass-Through Agency: Minnesota Department of Education Pass-Through Number: H027A190087 Award Period: Fiscal year 2023 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Material Noncompliance (Modified Opinion) Criteria or specific requirement: Non-federal entities other than states must follow the procurement standards set out at CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. This includes utilizing one of the five allowable procurement methods, including small purchase guidelines for items over the micro-purchase threshold and sealed bids, competitive proposals, or noncompetitive proposals when items exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. In addition, the Uniform Guidance requires that the entity maintain records sufficient to detail the history of the procurement. 2 CFR 200.303 requires that the entity have sufficient controls over compliance related to federal awards. Condition: During our testing of the District’s procurements within the Special Education program, it was noted that not all procurements followed the appropriate method and history of the transaction was not sufficiently documented. Questioned Costs: ALN 84.027 - $38,869 Context: Out of five procurement which were tested, we noted two of them for which the District did not retain documentation detailing the history of the procurement, including the rationale for choosing the particular vendor. Cause: The District during the pandemic and thereafter, was not able to properly ensure all contracts has procurement documentation retained and performed as required by the Uniform Guidance. Effect: The District was not in compliance with Uniform Guidance requirements for the proper documentation of all procurement transactions. Repeat Finding: Yes, 2022-004. Recommendation: We recommend the District reviews its procedures and controls over procurement to ensure that all procurements are documented such that a third party can clearly see and understand the detailed history of the procurement. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Federal agency: U.S. Department of Education Federal program name: Special Education Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 84.027 and 84.173 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: H027A220087, 2023 Pass-Through Agency: Minnesota Department of Education Pass-Through Number: H027A190087 Award Period: Fiscal year 2023 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Material Noncompliance (Modified Opinion) Criteria or specific requirement: Non-federal entities other than states must follow the procurement standards set out at CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. This includes utilizing one of the five allowable procurement methods, including small purchase guidelines for items over the micro-purchase threshold and sealed bids, competitive proposals, or noncompetitive proposals when items exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. In addition, the Uniform Guidance requires that the entity maintain records sufficient to detail the history of the procurement. 2 CFR 200.303 requires that the entity have sufficient controls over compliance related to federal awards. Condition: During our testing of the District’s procurements within the Special Education program, it was noted that not all procurements followed the appropriate method and history of the transaction was not sufficiently documented. Questioned Costs: ALN 84.027 - $38,869 Context: Out of five procurement which were tested, we noted two of them for which the District did not retain documentation detailing the history of the procurement, including the rationale for choosing the particular vendor. Cause: The District during the pandemic and thereafter, was not able to properly ensure all contracts has procurement documentation retained and performed as required by the Uniform Guidance. Effect: The District was not in compliance with Uniform Guidance requirements for the proper documentation of all procurement transactions. Repeat Finding: Yes, 2022-004. Recommendation: We recommend the District reviews its procedures and controls over procurement to ensure that all procurements are documented such that a third party can clearly see and understand the detailed history of the procurement. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Federal agency: U.S. Department of Education Federal program name: Special Education Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 84.027 and 84.173 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: H027A220087, 2023 Pass-Through Agency: Minnesota Department of Education Pass-Through Number: H027A190087 Award Period: Fiscal year 2023 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Material Noncompliance (Modified Opinion) Criteria or specific requirement: Non-federal entities other than states must follow the procurement standards set out at CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. This includes utilizing one of the five allowable procurement methods, including small purchase guidelines for items over the micro-purchase threshold and sealed bids, competitive proposals, or noncompetitive proposals when items exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. In addition, the Uniform Guidance requires that the entity maintain records sufficient to detail the history of the procurement. 2 CFR 200.303 requires that the entity have sufficient controls over compliance related to federal awards. Condition: During our testing of the District’s procurements within the Special Education program, it was noted that not all procurements followed the appropriate method and history of the transaction was not sufficiently documented. Questioned Costs: ALN 84.027 - $38,869 Context: Out of five procurement which were tested, we noted two of them for which the District did not retain documentation detailing the history of the procurement, including the rationale for choosing the particular vendor. Cause: The District during the pandemic and thereafter, was not able to properly ensure all contracts has procurement documentation retained and performed as required by the Uniform Guidance. Effect: The District was not in compliance with Uniform Guidance requirements for the proper documentation of all procurement transactions. Repeat Finding: Yes, 2022-004. Recommendation: We recommend the District reviews its procedures and controls over procurement to ensure that all procurements are documented such that a third party can clearly see and understand the detailed history of the procurement. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Federal agency: U.S. Department of Education Federal program name: Special Education Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 84.027 and 84.173 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: H027A220087, 2023 Pass-Through Agency: Minnesota Department of Education Pass-Through Number: H027A190087 Award Period: Fiscal year 2023 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Material Noncompliance (Modified Opinion) Criteria or specific requirement: Non-federal entities other than states must follow the procurement standards set out at CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. This includes utilizing one of the five allowable procurement methods, including small purchase guidelines for items over the micro-purchase threshold and sealed bids, competitive proposals, or noncompetitive proposals when items exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. In addition, the Uniform Guidance requires that the entity maintain records sufficient to detail the history of the procurement. 2 CFR 200.303 requires that the entity have sufficient controls over compliance related to federal awards. Condition: During our testing of the District’s procurements within the Special Education program, it was noted that not all procurements followed the appropriate method and history of the transaction was not sufficiently documented. Questioned Costs: ALN 84.027 - $38,869 Context: Out of five procurement which were tested, we noted two of them for which the District did not retain documentation detailing the history of the procurement, including the rationale for choosing the particular vendor. Cause: The District during the pandemic and thereafter, was not able to properly ensure all contracts has procurement documentation retained and performed as required by the Uniform Guidance. Effect: The District was not in compliance with Uniform Guidance requirements for the proper documentation of all procurement transactions. Repeat Finding: Yes, 2022-004. Recommendation: We recommend the District reviews its procedures and controls over procurement to ensure that all procurements are documented such that a third party can clearly see and understand the detailed history of the procurement. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Finding 2023-002: Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment (Material Weakness) Federal Program: Assistance Listing Number 14.267 Criterion or Specific Requirements: 2 CFR Section 200.318 requires that the non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. 2 CFR Section 200.214 requires that, for covered transactions, a non-Federal entity must verify that entities are not suspended, debarred or otherwise excluded. This verification may be accomplished by checking the System for Award Management (SAM) website maintained by the General Services Administration. Condition: IW has a formal written procurement policy, but it does not conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327, which is the Uniform Guidance. As a result, no procurement files were maintained to document IW's procurement actions. In addition, for all disbursements tested, IW could not provide documentation of their verification, prior to payment, that the vendors were not suspended, debarred or otherwise excluded. Questioned Costs: None. Cause: IW has not updated its written procurement policy to conform to the Uniform Guidance. In addition, IW did not require that evidence of SAM checks be maintained in its vendor files. As a result, IW did not maintain adequate support to provide evidence that appropriate suspension and debarment searches were performed. Despite the lack of documentation, a search was performed after the fact to verify that the vendors or individuals in our sample were not suspended, debarred or otherwise excluded. Therefore, no questioned costs have been reported related to the sample that was tested. Effect or Potential Effect: Without an updated procurement policy that conforms to the Uniform Guidance and related procurement documentation, there is a risk that IW did not perform a proper evaluation of each potential vendor whose costs were charged to Federal programs. In addition, IW could not readily provide evidence that it had assessed whether or not its vendors were suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. As a result, the potential for payments to suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded vendors and individuals exists. Recommendation: IW should revise its procurement policy so that it conforms to the Uniform Guidance. Furthermore, IW should maintain documentation in its files to provide evidence to support that it followed the procurement policy. In addition, IW should establish internal controls to ensure documentation is maintained to evidence that it performed the required suspension and debarment searches on the SAM website.
Finding 2023-002: Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment (Material Weakness) Federal Program: Assistance Listing Number 14.267 Criterion or Specific Requirements: 2 CFR Section 200.318 requires that the non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. 2 CFR Section 200.214 requires that, for covered transactions, a non-Federal entity must verify that entities are not suspended, debarred or otherwise excluded. This verification may be accomplished by checking the System for Award Management (SAM) website maintained by the General Services Administration. Condition: IW has a formal written procurement policy, but it does not conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327, which is the Uniform Guidance. As a result, no procurement files were maintained to document IW's procurement actions. In addition, for all disbursements tested, IW could not provide documentation of their verification, prior to payment, that the vendors were not suspended, debarred or otherwise excluded. Questioned Costs: None. Cause: IW has not updated its written procurement policy to conform to the Uniform Guidance. In addition, IW did not require that evidence of SAM checks be maintained in its vendor files. As a result, IW did not maintain adequate support to provide evidence that appropriate suspension and debarment searches were performed. Despite the lack of documentation, a search was performed after the fact to verify that the vendors or individuals in our sample were not suspended, debarred or otherwise excluded. Therefore, no questioned costs have been reported related to the sample that was tested. Effect or Potential Effect: Without an updated procurement policy that conforms to the Uniform Guidance and related procurement documentation, there is a risk that IW did not perform a proper evaluation of each potential vendor whose costs were charged to Federal programs. In addition, IW could not readily provide evidence that it had assessed whether or not its vendors were suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. As a result, the potential for payments to suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded vendors and individuals exists. Recommendation: IW should revise its procurement policy so that it conforms to the Uniform Guidance. Furthermore, IW should maintain documentation in its files to provide evidence to support that it followed the procurement policy. In addition, IW should establish internal controls to ensure documentation is maintained to evidence that it performed the required suspension and debarment searches on the SAM website.
2023-002 U.S. Department of Transportation, National Infrastructure Investments: Better Utilizing Investments to Leverage Development (BUILD) Grant Assistance Listing Number 20.933 Procurement Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303(a) establishes that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award the provides assurance that the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations and conditions of the federal award. Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. Effective May 14, 2022, the non-Federal entity must ensure that all applicable programs comply with section 70914 of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act, including through incorporation of a Buy America preference in the terms and conditions of each award with an infrastructure project. Condition: The Port Authority’s formally documented policy pre-dates Uniform Guidance and does not include many of the necessary procurement provisions. Cause: The Port Authority does not have a policy in place under the most current regulations for the federal programs the Port Authority administrates. Effect: The Port Authority does not have a policy in place and is at risk for not being in accordance with federal regulations for the federal programs the Port Authority administrates. However, note that the Port Authority does use an engineering firm that appears to be following a policy that is up-to-date with federal regulations for this federal program. Questioned costs: None reported.Context: Procurement requirements were applicable to 1 vendor for this program in FY2023. The vendor appears to have bidding documents in accordance with federal regulations, including the BABA Act. Repeat Finding From Prior Year: No Recommendation: The policy should be updated to include all federal requirements for procurement and updated on a regular basis as those regulations change. Views of Responsible Officials: We agree with the finding
Federal Agency: United States Department of Treasury Federal Program Name: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Not Available Pass-Through Agency: State of Connecticut Office of Policy and Management Pass-Through Number: 12060-OPM20600-29669 Award Period: March 3, 2021 through December 31, 2026 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance, Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (UG) requires compliance with the provisions of procurement, suspension, and debarment. Condition: There were no controls in place to review for suspension and debarment on related procurement activities. Questioned Costs: None Context: Although testing did not reveal vendors providing services under this grant that were suspended and debarred, no policy exists for the Town to analyze this requirement. Cause: The Town did not have the resources necessary to implement a conforming policy during the fiscal year. Effect: With the absence of a compliant policy, the Town is at risk for noncompliance as it relates to all federal procurement requirements. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendations: We recommend that the Town review its formal procurement policies and revise with the criteria in 2 CFR sections 200.318 and 200.326. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with this finding.
Federal Agency: United States Department of Treasury Federal Program Name: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Not Available Pass-Through Agency: State of Connecticut Office of Policy and Management Pass-Through Number: 12060-OPM20600-29669 Award Period: March 3, 2021 through December 31, 2026 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance, Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (UG) requires compliance with the provisions of procurement, suspension, and debarment. Condition: There were no controls in place to review for suspension and debarment on related procurement activities. Questioned Costs: None Context: Although testing did not reveal vendors providing services under this grant that were suspended and debarred, no policy exists for the Town to analyze this requirement. Cause: The Town did not have the resources necessary to implement a conforming policy during the fiscal year. Effect: With the absence of a compliant policy, the Town is at risk for noncompliance as it relates to all federal procurement requirements. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendations: We recommend that the Town review its formal procurement policies and revise with the criteria in 2 CFR sections 200.318 and 200.326. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with this finding.
Federal Agency: United States Department of Treasury Federal Program Name: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Not Available Pass-Through Agency: State of Connecticut Office of Policy and Management Pass-Through Number: 12060-OPM20600-29669 Award Period: March 3, 2021 through December 31, 2026 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance, Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (UG) requires compliance with the provisions of procurement, suspension, and debarment. Condition: There were no controls in place to review for suspension and debarment on related procurement activities. Questioned Costs: None Context: Although testing did not reveal vendors providing services under this grant that were suspended and debarred, no policy exists for the Town to analyze this requirement. Cause: The Town did not have the resources necessary to implement a conforming policy during the fiscal year. Effect: With the absence of a compliant policy, the Town is at risk for noncompliance as it relates to all federal procurement requirements. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendations: We recommend that the Town review its formal procurement policies and revise with the criteria in 2 CFR sections 200.318 and 200.326. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with this finding.
FINDING 2023-001 PROCUREMENT SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY Federal Program: Charter School Programs Assistance Listing Numbers: 84.282A Criteria Per 2 CFR 200.318, “The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §200.317 through 200.327.” Per 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2)(i) Small Purchase Procedures, “The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity.” Condition The School was unable to provide documentation to support that price comparisons were obtained from vendors for costs falling in the category of small purchases (between $10,000 and $249,999). Additionally, the School’s procedures manual did not include procedures for the handling of these transactions. Cause Documentation was not maintained to support that this step in the procurement process was completed. Effect Not documenting these procedures could result in the School completing procurement transactions not in compliance with Federal regulations. Recommendation We recommend the School develop procedures to ensure price comparisons are obtained and documented. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions The School’s Corrective Action Plan is included on page 23.
FINDING 2023-001 PROCUREMENT SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY Federal Program: Charter School Programs Assistance Listing Numbers: 84.282A Criteria Per 2 CFR 200.318, “The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §200.317 through 200.327.” Per 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2)(i) Small Purchase Procedures, “The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity.” Condition The School was unable to provide documentation to support that price comparisons were obtained from vendors for costs falling in the category of small purchases (between $10,000 and $249,999). Additionally, the School’s procedures manual did not include procedures for the handling of these transactions. Cause Documentation was not maintained to support that this step in the procurement process was completed. Effect Not documenting these procedures could result in the School completing procurement transactions not in compliance with Federal regulations. Recommendation We recommend the School develop procedures to ensure price comparisons are obtained and documented. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions The School’s Corrective Action Plan is included on page 23.
Education Stabilization Fund - AL #84.425, Year Ended June 30, 2023 Career and Technical Education - AL #84.048, Year Ended June 30, 2023 U.S. Department of Education Pass-Through Entity - Pennsylvania Department of Education Criteria: The Uniform Guidance requires that non-federal entities must have and use documented procurement procedures consistent with laws and regulations and the standards for the acquisition of property or services under a federal award or subaward in accordance with 2 CFR 200.318. Furthermore, the non-federal entity is required to follow formal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or service under a federal financial assistance award exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold in accordance with 2 CFR 200.320. Condition: The Center did not follow the appropriate procedures to comply with Uniform Grant Guidance. During testing, it was noted that the Center made procurements through noncompetitive procurement arrangements. Consistent with 2 CFR § 200.320(c)(3), an LEA may determine that its response to the COVID-19 pandemic qualifies as a public exigency or emergency that does not permit the delay that would result from competitive bidding. Under these circumstances, and to the degree doing so is consistent with its own policies and procedures, the Center could use noncompetitive procurement. The Center should consult with the Pennsylvania Department of Education before using this authority. Subsequently, the Center paid for this purchase utilizing the Education Stabilization Fund and Career and Technical Education monies. In using federal funds to pay for these items, the Center inadvertently did not follow its procurement policy. Cause and Effect: When the Center initially made the purchases, they did not follow the more stringent requirements imposed by Uniform Guidance. The Center did not follow its procurement policy and ultimately did not comply with the standard of the Uniform Grant Guidance. Identification of Repeat Finding: No Questioned Costs: None Recommendation: We recommend that when the Center decides to utilize cooperative purchasing programs or noncompetitive purchasing arrangements and use federal funds to pay for those purchases they ensure that they comply with their procurement policy. The Center should then document its process and how it complies with the procurement standards and keep such documentation with Federal Award budget/procurement documents. Management Response: The Center acknowledges this finding, and has since revised its procurement process to include the requisite items as required by the US DoE (ED) Uniform Grant Guidance (UGG) in its subsequent purchases with Federal Funds. It is also noted that most if not all of these purchases were made in response to the COVID-19 Pandemic, and with delayed guidance from PA Department of Education’s Federal Programs Office. When alerted to the guidance, the Center implemented the proper procedures
Education Stabilization Fund - AL #84.425, Year Ended June 30, 2023 Career and Technical Education - AL #84.048, Year Ended June 30, 2023 U.S. Department of Education Pass-Through Entity - Pennsylvania Department of Education Criteria: The Uniform Guidance requires that non-federal entities must have and use documented procurement procedures consistent with laws and regulations and the standards for the acquisition of property or services under a federal award or subaward in accordance with 2 CFR 200.318. Furthermore, the non-federal entity is required to follow formal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or service under a federal financial assistance award exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold in accordance with 2 CFR 200.320. Condition: The Center did not follow the appropriate procedures to comply with Uniform Grant Guidance. During testing, it was noted that the Center made procurements through noncompetitive procurement arrangements. Consistent with 2 CFR § 200.320(c)(3), an LEA may determine that its response to the COVID-19 pandemic qualifies as a public exigency or emergency that does not permit the delay that would result from competitive bidding. Under these circumstances, and to the degree doing so is consistent with its own policies and procedures, the Center could use noncompetitive procurement. The Center should consult with the Pennsylvania Department of Education before using this authority. Subsequently, the Center paid for this purchase utilizing the Education Stabilization Fund and Career and Technical Education monies. In using federal funds to pay for these items, the Center inadvertently did not follow its procurement policy. Cause and Effect: When the Center initially made the purchases, they did not follow the more stringent requirements imposed by Uniform Guidance. The Center did not follow its procurement policy and ultimately did not comply with the standard of the Uniform Grant Guidance. Identification of Repeat Finding: No Questioned Costs: None Recommendation: We recommend that when the Center decides to utilize cooperative purchasing programs or noncompetitive purchasing arrangements and use federal funds to pay for those purchases they ensure that they comply with their procurement policy. The Center should then document its process and how it complies with the procurement standards and keep such documentation with Federal Award budget/procurement documents. Management Response: The Center acknowledges this finding, and has since revised its procurement process to include the requisite items as required by the US DoE (ED) Uniform Grant Guidance (UGG) in its subsequent purchases with Federal Funds. It is also noted that most if not all of these purchases were made in response to the COVID-19 Pandemic, and with delayed guidance from PA Department of Education’s Federal Programs Office. When alerted to the guidance, the Center implemented the proper procedures
Education Stabilization Fund - AL #84.425, Year Ended June 30, 2023 Career and Technical Education - AL #84.048, Year Ended June 30, 2023 U.S. Department of Education Pass-Through Entity - Pennsylvania Department of Education Criteria: The Uniform Guidance requires that non-federal entities must have and use documented procurement procedures consistent with laws and regulations and the standards for the acquisition of property or services under a federal award or subaward in accordance with 2 CFR 200.318. Furthermore, the non-federal entity is required to follow formal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or service under a federal financial assistance award exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold in accordance with 2 CFR 200.320. Condition: The Center did not follow the appropriate procedures to comply with Uniform Grant Guidance. During testing, it was noted that the Center made procurements through noncompetitive procurement arrangements. Consistent with 2 CFR § 200.320(c)(3), an LEA may determine that its response to the COVID-19 pandemic qualifies as a public exigency or emergency that does not permit the delay that would result from competitive bidding. Under these circumstances, and to the degree doing so is consistent with its own policies and procedures, the Center could use noncompetitive procurement. The Center should consult with the Pennsylvania Department of Education before using this authority. Subsequently, the Center paid for this purchase utilizing the Education Stabilization Fund and Career and Technical Education monies. In using federal funds to pay for these items, the Center inadvertently did not follow its procurement policy. Cause and Effect: When the Center initially made the purchases, they did not follow the more stringent requirements imposed by Uniform Guidance. The Center did not follow its procurement policy and ultimately did not comply with the standard of the Uniform Grant Guidance. Identification of Repeat Finding: No Questioned Costs: None Recommendation: We recommend that when the Center decides to utilize cooperative purchasing programs or noncompetitive purchasing arrangements and use federal funds to pay for those purchases they ensure that they comply with their procurement policy. The Center should then document its process and how it complies with the procurement standards and keep such documentation with Federal Award budget/procurement documents. Management Response: The Center acknowledges this finding, and has since revised its procurement process to include the requisite items as required by the US DoE (ED) Uniform Grant Guidance (UGG) in its subsequent purchases with Federal Funds. It is also noted that most if not all of these purchases were made in response to the COVID-19 Pandemic, and with delayed guidance from PA Department of Education’s Federal Programs Office. When alerted to the guidance, the Center implemented the proper procedures
2 CFR § 400.1 gives regulatory effect for the U.S. Department of Agriculture to the OMB guidance in 2 CFR § 200. 2 CFR § 200.317 - 200.327 requires entities to use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable State and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-Federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR 200.320(a)(1) and (2). Under the micro-purchase method, the aggregate dollar amount does not exceed $10,000 ($2,000 in the case of acquisition for construction subject to the Wage Rate Requirements (Davis-Bacon Act)). Small purchase procedures are used for purchases that exceed the micro-purchase amount but do not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold ($250,000). Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive quotations if the non-Federal entity considers the price to be reasonable (2 CFR 200.320(a)). If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources (2 CFR 200.320(b)). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-Federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR 200.320(b)(2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR 200.320(c). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR 200.324(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR 200.324(d)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The School District paid more than $250,000 to Valley Wholesale during fiscal year 2023 for food products for the Child Nutrition Cluster. This amount exceeded the simplified acquisition threshold thus the District should follow a formal competitive procurement method described in 2 CFR 200.320(b). However, the School District did not follow a formal procurement method because they chose to use this local vendor (Valley Wholesale) to allow them to get their fresh produce in a timely manner to avoid food waste. The School District did not have the proper internal controls in place to ensure proper bidding procedures were followed. Failure to have the appropriate controls in place may result in vendors being used that are not providing the best possible prices. The School District should follow their established procurement policies and federal guidelines when choosing all vendors for the Child Nutrition Cluster.
2 CFR § 400.1 gives regulatory effect for the U.S. Department of Agriculture to the OMB guidance in 2 CFR § 200. 2 CFR § 200.317 - 200.327 requires entities to use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable State and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-Federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR 200.320(a)(1) and (2). Under the micro-purchase method, the aggregate dollar amount does not exceed $10,000 ($2,000 in the case of acquisition for construction subject to the Wage Rate Requirements (Davis-Bacon Act)). Small purchase procedures are used for purchases that exceed the micro-purchase amount but do not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold ($250,000). Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive quotations if the non-Federal entity considers the price to be reasonable (2 CFR 200.320(a)). If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources (2 CFR 200.320(b)). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-Federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR 200.320(b)(2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR 200.320(c). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR 200.324(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR 200.324(d)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The School District paid more than $250,000 to Valley Wholesale during fiscal year 2023 for food products for the Child Nutrition Cluster. This amount exceeded the simplified acquisition threshold thus the District should follow a formal competitive procurement method described in 2 CFR 200.320(b). However, the School District did not follow a formal procurement method because they chose to use this local vendor (Valley Wholesale) to allow them to get their fresh produce in a timely manner to avoid food waste. The School District did not have the proper internal controls in place to ensure proper bidding procedures were followed. Failure to have the appropriate controls in place may result in vendors being used that are not providing the best possible prices. The School District should follow their established procurement policies and federal guidelines when choosing all vendors for the Child Nutrition Cluster.
2 CFR § 400.1 gives regulatory effect for the U.S. Department of Agriculture to the OMB guidance in 2 CFR § 200. 2 CFR § 200.317 - 200.327 requires entities to use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable State and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-Federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR 200.320(a)(1) and (2). Under the micro-purchase method, the aggregate dollar amount does not exceed $10,000 ($2,000 in the case of acquisition for construction subject to the Wage Rate Requirements (Davis-Bacon Act)). Small purchase procedures are used for purchases that exceed the micro-purchase amount but do not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold ($250,000). Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive quotations if the non-Federal entity considers the price to be reasonable (2 CFR 200.320(a)). If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources (2 CFR 200.320(b)). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-Federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR 200.320(b)(2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR 200.320(c). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR 200.324(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR 200.324(d)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The School District paid more than $250,000 to Valley Wholesale during fiscal year 2023 for food products for the Child Nutrition Cluster. This amount exceeded the simplified acquisition threshold thus the District should follow a formal competitive procurement method described in 2 CFR 200.320(b). However, the School District did not follow a formal procurement method because they chose to use this local vendor (Valley Wholesale) to allow them to get their fresh produce in a timely manner to avoid food waste. The School District did not have the proper internal controls in place to ensure proper bidding procedures were followed. Failure to have the appropriate controls in place may result in vendors being used that are not providing the best possible prices. The School District should follow their established procurement policies and federal guidelines when choosing all vendors for the Child Nutrition Cluster.
Internal Control over Compliance with Suspension and Debarment Requirements Federal Agency: U.S. Department of State, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs Assistance Listing Numbers: 19.415 Federal Program Names: Professional and Cultural Exchange Programs – Citizen Exchanges Pass-through Entity: American Councils for International Education Pass-through Award Number: S-ECAGD-22-CA-0039 Criteria: Under 2 CFR 200.318, the non-federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with laws and regulations, to ensure the entity does not enter into contracts for covered transactions over $25,000. Condition: The excluded parties search or other verification of suspension and debarment status was not documented for certain covered transactions during the year ended June 30, 2023. Cause: During the year ended June 30, 2023, the Organization experienced turnover in its program and accounting departments, resulting in certain internal controls over compliance being missed. Effect: Inadequate controls over suspension and debarment requirements could result in the Organization expending federal award funds on contracts or other covered transactions with entities that have been suspended or debarred. Recommendation: We recommend that management develops and implements specific internal controls to verify suspension and debarment status for all covered transactions with potential contractors and vendors. Views of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the finding.
Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Award requires compliance with the provisions of procurement. Specifically, §200.318 General procurement standards indicates “the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include but are not necessarily limited to the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price.” In addition, Uniform Grant Guidance (2 CFR 200.303) requires nonfederal entities receiving Federal awards establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal laws, regulations, and program compliance requirements. Condition: A selection of procurements did not maintain sufficient documentation that detailed the history of the procurement and justification for using non-competitive practices. Questioned costs: Known questioned costs of $23,890. (NA21NMF4370552 = $4,650, NA22NMF4370355 = $12,440, NA22NMF4360330 = $6,800) Context: In a statistically valid sample, three of forty procurement selections tested, did not have sufficient documentation to justify their acquisition method. One item related to purchase decisions dictated by a subrecipient; however the payment was made directly by the Commission and no justification showing an adequate procurement process was provided by the subrecipient. Two selections related to procurements with a long-standing vendor which was used as the justification for selection, however no documentation was provided for the justification to continue using this vendor. Cause: Insufficient understanding and application of procurement policies when unusual situations arise. Effect: Noncompliance could lead the Commission to enter into contracts with vendors that are not the most suitable for the goods and/or services being procured. Repeat finding: Yes – see finding 2022-001 from the prior year. Recommendation: We recommend increased internal monitoring to ensure that noncompetitive procurements are sufficiently justified, and that internal Sole Source Justification Forms are completed correctly and retained for all vendors procured under noncompetitive methods. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Award requires compliance with the provisions of procurement. Specifically, §200.318 General procurement standards indicates “the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include but are not necessarily limited to the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price.” In addition, Uniform Grant Guidance (2 CFR 200.303) requires nonfederal entities receiving Federal awards establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal laws, regulations, and program compliance requirements. Condition: A selection of procurements did not maintain sufficient documentation that detailed the history of the procurement and justification for using non-competitive practices. Questioned costs: Known questioned costs of $23,890. (NA21NMF4370552 = $4,650, NA22NMF4370355 = $12,440, NA22NMF4360330 = $6,800) Context: In a statistically valid sample, three of forty procurement selections tested, did not have sufficient documentation to justify their acquisition method. One item related to purchase decisions dictated by a subrecipient; however the payment was made directly by the Commission and no justification showing an adequate procurement process was provided by the subrecipient. Two selections related to procurements with a long-standing vendor which was used as the justification for selection, however no documentation was provided for the justification to continue using this vendor. Cause: Insufficient understanding and application of procurement policies when unusual situations arise. Effect: Noncompliance could lead the Commission to enter into contracts with vendors that are not the most suitable for the goods and/or services being procured. Repeat finding: Yes – see finding 2022-001 from the prior year. Recommendation: We recommend increased internal monitoring to ensure that noncompetitive procurements are sufficiently justified, and that internal Sole Source Justification Forms are completed correctly and retained for all vendors procured under noncompetitive methods. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Award requires compliance with the provisions of procurement. Specifically, §200.318 General procurement standards indicates “the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include but are not necessarily limited to the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price.” In addition, Uniform Grant Guidance (2 CFR 200.303) requires nonfederal entities receiving Federal awards establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal laws, regulations, and program compliance requirements. Condition: A selection of procurements did not maintain sufficient documentation that detailed the history of the procurement and justification for using non-competitive practices. Questioned costs: Known questioned costs of $23,890. (NA21NMF4370552 = $4,650, NA22NMF4370355 = $12,440, NA22NMF4360330 = $6,800) Context: In a statistically valid sample, three of forty procurement selections tested, did not have sufficient documentation to justify their acquisition method. One item related to purchase decisions dictated by a subrecipient; however the payment was made directly by the Commission and no justification showing an adequate procurement process was provided by the subrecipient. Two selections related to procurements with a long-standing vendor which was used as the justification for selection, however no documentation was provided for the justification to continue using this vendor. Cause: Insufficient understanding and application of procurement policies when unusual situations arise. Effect: Noncompliance could lead the Commission to enter into contracts with vendors that are not the most suitable for the goods and/or services being procured. Repeat finding: Yes – see finding 2022-001 from the prior year. Recommendation: We recommend increased internal monitoring to ensure that noncompetitive procurements are sufficiently justified, and that internal Sole Source Justification Forms are completed correctly and retained for all vendors procured under noncompetitive methods. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Award requires compliance with the provisions of procurement. Specifically, §200.318 General procurement standards indicates “the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include but are not necessarily limited to the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price.” In addition, Uniform Grant Guidance (2 CFR 200.303) requires nonfederal entities receiving Federal awards establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal laws, regulations, and program compliance requirements. Condition: A selection of procurements did not maintain sufficient documentation that detailed the history of the procurement and justification for using non-competitive practices. Questioned costs: Known questioned costs of $23,890. (NA21NMF4370552 = $4,650, NA22NMF4370355 = $12,440, NA22NMF4360330 = $6,800) Context: In a statistically valid sample, three of forty procurement selections tested, did not have sufficient documentation to justify their acquisition method. One item related to purchase decisions dictated by a subrecipient; however the payment was made directly by the Commission and no justification showing an adequate procurement process was provided by the subrecipient. Two selections related to procurements with a long-standing vendor which was used as the justification for selection, however no documentation was provided for the justification to continue using this vendor. Cause: Insufficient understanding and application of procurement policies when unusual situations arise. Effect: Noncompliance could lead the Commission to enter into contracts with vendors that are not the most suitable for the goods and/or services being procured. Repeat finding: Yes – see finding 2022-001 from the prior year. Recommendation: We recommend increased internal monitoring to ensure that noncompetitive procurements are sufficiently justified, and that internal Sole Source Justification Forms are completed correctly and retained for all vendors procured under noncompetitive methods. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Award requires compliance with the provisions of procurement. Specifically, §200.318 General procurement standards indicates “the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include but are not necessarily limited to the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price.” In addition, Uniform Grant Guidance (2 CFR 200.303) requires nonfederal entities receiving Federal awards establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal laws, regulations, and program compliance requirements. Condition: A selection of procurements did not maintain sufficient documentation that detailed the history of the procurement and justification for using non-competitive practices. Questioned costs: Known questioned costs of $23,890. (NA21NMF4370552 = $4,650, NA22NMF4370355 = $12,440, NA22NMF4360330 = $6,800) Context: In a statistically valid sample, three of forty procurement selections tested, did not have sufficient documentation to justify their acquisition method. One item related to purchase decisions dictated by a subrecipient; however the payment was made directly by the Commission and no justification showing an adequate procurement process was provided by the subrecipient. Two selections related to procurements with a long-standing vendor which was used as the justification for selection, however no documentation was provided for the justification to continue using this vendor. Cause: Insufficient understanding and application of procurement policies when unusual situations arise. Effect: Noncompliance could lead the Commission to enter into contracts with vendors that are not the most suitable for the goods and/or services being procured. Repeat finding: Yes – see finding 2022-001 from the prior year. Recommendation: We recommend increased internal monitoring to ensure that noncompetitive procurements are sufficiently justified, and that internal Sole Source Justification Forms are completed correctly and retained for all vendors procured under noncompetitive methods. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Award requires compliance with the provisions of procurement. Specifically, §200.318 General procurement standards indicates “the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include but are not necessarily limited to the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price.” In addition, Uniform Grant Guidance (2 CFR 200.303) requires nonfederal entities receiving Federal awards establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal laws, regulations, and program compliance requirements. Condition: A selection of procurements did not maintain sufficient documentation that detailed the history of the procurement and justification for using non-competitive practices. Questioned costs: Known questioned costs of $23,890. (NA21NMF4370552 = $4,650, NA22NMF4370355 = $12,440, NA22NMF4360330 = $6,800) Context: In a statistically valid sample, three of forty procurement selections tested, did not have sufficient documentation to justify their acquisition method. One item related to purchase decisions dictated by a subrecipient; however the payment was made directly by the Commission and no justification showing an adequate procurement process was provided by the subrecipient. Two selections related to procurements with a long-standing vendor which was used as the justification for selection, however no documentation was provided for the justification to continue using this vendor. Cause: Insufficient understanding and application of procurement policies when unusual situations arise. Effect: Noncompliance could lead the Commission to enter into contracts with vendors that are not the most suitable for the goods and/or services being procured. Repeat finding: Yes – see finding 2022-001 from the prior year. Recommendation: We recommend increased internal monitoring to ensure that noncompetitive procurements are sufficiently justified, and that internal Sole Source Justification Forms are completed correctly and retained for all vendors procured under noncompetitive methods. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Award requires compliance with the provisions of procurement. Specifically, §200.318 General procurement standards indicates “the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include but are not necessarily limited to the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price.” In addition, Uniform Grant Guidance (2 CFR 200.303) requires nonfederal entities receiving Federal awards establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal laws, regulations, and program compliance requirements. Condition: A selection of procurements did not maintain sufficient documentation that detailed the history of the procurement and justification for using non-competitive practices. Questioned costs: Known questioned costs of $23,890. (NA21NMF4370552 = $4,650, NA22NMF4370355 = $12,440, NA22NMF4360330 = $6,800) Context: In a statistically valid sample, three of forty procurement selections tested, did not have sufficient documentation to justify their acquisition method. One item related to purchase decisions dictated by a subrecipient; however the payment was made directly by the Commission and no justification showing an adequate procurement process was provided by the subrecipient. Two selections related to procurements with a long-standing vendor which was used as the justification for selection, however no documentation was provided for the justification to continue using this vendor. Cause: Insufficient understanding and application of procurement policies when unusual situations arise. Effect: Noncompliance could lead the Commission to enter into contracts with vendors that are not the most suitable for the goods and/or services being procured. Repeat finding: Yes – see finding 2022-001 from the prior year. Recommendation: We recommend increased internal monitoring to ensure that noncompetitive procurements are sufficiently justified, and that internal Sole Source Justification Forms are completed correctly and retained for all vendors procured under noncompetitive methods. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Award requires compliance with the provisions of procurement. Specifically, §200.318 General procurement standards indicates “the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include but are not necessarily limited to the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price.” In addition, Uniform Grant Guidance (2 CFR 200.303) requires nonfederal entities receiving Federal awards establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal laws, regulations, and program compliance requirements. Condition: A selection of procurements did not maintain sufficient documentation that detailed the history of the procurement and justification for using non-competitive practices. Questioned costs: Known questioned costs of $23,890. (NA21NMF4370552 = $4,650, NA22NMF4370355 = $12,440, NA22NMF4360330 = $6,800) Context: In a statistically valid sample, three of forty procurement selections tested, did not have sufficient documentation to justify their acquisition method. One item related to purchase decisions dictated by a subrecipient; however the payment was made directly by the Commission and no justification showing an adequate procurement process was provided by the subrecipient. Two selections related to procurements with a long-standing vendor which was used as the justification for selection, however no documentation was provided for the justification to continue using this vendor. Cause: Insufficient understanding and application of procurement policies when unusual situations arise. Effect: Noncompliance could lead the Commission to enter into contracts with vendors that are not the most suitable for the goods and/or services being procured. Repeat finding: Yes – see finding 2022-001 from the prior year. Recommendation: We recommend increased internal monitoring to ensure that noncompetitive procurements are sufficiently justified, and that internal Sole Source Justification Forms are completed correctly and retained for all vendors procured under noncompetitive methods. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Award requires compliance with the provisions of procurement. Specifically, §200.318 General procurement standards indicates “the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include but are not necessarily limited to the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price.” In addition, Uniform Grant Guidance (2 CFR 200.303) requires nonfederal entities receiving Federal awards establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal laws, regulations, and program compliance requirements. Condition: A selection of procurements did not maintain sufficient documentation that detailed the history of the procurement and justification for using non-competitive practices. Questioned costs: Known questioned costs of $23,890. (NA21NMF4370552 = $4,650, NA22NMF4370355 = $12,440, NA22NMF4360330 = $6,800) Context: In a statistically valid sample, three of forty procurement selections tested, did not have sufficient documentation to justify their acquisition method. One item related to purchase decisions dictated by a subrecipient; however the payment was made directly by the Commission and no justification showing an adequate procurement process was provided by the subrecipient. Two selections related to procurements with a long-standing vendor which was used as the justification for selection, however no documentation was provided for the justification to continue using this vendor. Cause: Insufficient understanding and application of procurement policies when unusual situations arise. Effect: Noncompliance could lead the Commission to enter into contracts with vendors that are not the most suitable for the goods and/or services being procured. Repeat finding: Yes – see finding 2022-001 from the prior year. Recommendation: We recommend increased internal monitoring to ensure that noncompetitive procurements are sufficiently justified, and that internal Sole Source Justification Forms are completed correctly and retained for all vendors procured under noncompetitive methods. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Award requires compliance with the provisions of procurement. Specifically, §200.318 General procurement standards indicates “the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include but are not necessarily limited to the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price.” In addition, Uniform Grant Guidance (2 CFR 200.303) requires nonfederal entities receiving Federal awards establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal laws, regulations, and program compliance requirements. Condition: A selection of procurements did not maintain sufficient documentation that detailed the history of the procurement and justification for using non-competitive practices. Questioned costs: Known questioned costs of $23,890. (NA21NMF4370552 = $4,650, NA22NMF4370355 = $12,440, NA22NMF4360330 = $6,800) Context: In a statistically valid sample, three of forty procurement selections tested, did not have sufficient documentation to justify their acquisition method. One item related to purchase decisions dictated by a subrecipient; however the payment was made directly by the Commission and no justification showing an adequate procurement process was provided by the subrecipient. Two selections related to procurements with a long-standing vendor which was used as the justification for selection, however no documentation was provided for the justification to continue using this vendor. Cause: Insufficient understanding and application of procurement policies when unusual situations arise. Effect: Noncompliance could lead the Commission to enter into contracts with vendors that are not the most suitable for the goods and/or services being procured. Repeat finding: Yes – see finding 2022-001 from the prior year. Recommendation: We recommend increased internal monitoring to ensure that noncompetitive procurements are sufficiently justified, and that internal Sole Source Justification Forms are completed correctly and retained for all vendors procured under noncompetitive methods. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Award requires compliance with the provisions of procurement. Specifically, §200.318 General procurement standards indicates “the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include but are not necessarily limited to the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price.” In addition, Uniform Grant Guidance (2 CFR 200.303) requires nonfederal entities receiving Federal awards establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal laws, regulations, and program compliance requirements. Condition: A selection of procurements did not maintain sufficient documentation that detailed the history of the procurement and justification for using non-competitive practices. Questioned costs: Known questioned costs of $23,890. (NA21NMF4370552 = $4,650, NA22NMF4370355 = $12,440, NA22NMF4360330 = $6,800) Context: In a statistically valid sample, three of forty procurement selections tested, did not have sufficient documentation to justify their acquisition method. One item related to purchase decisions dictated by a subrecipient; however the payment was made directly by the Commission and no justification showing an adequate procurement process was provided by the subrecipient. Two selections related to procurements with a long-standing vendor which was used as the justification for selection, however no documentation was provided for the justification to continue using this vendor. Cause: Insufficient understanding and application of procurement policies when unusual situations arise. Effect: Noncompliance could lead the Commission to enter into contracts with vendors that are not the most suitable for the goods and/or services being procured. Repeat finding: Yes – see finding 2022-001 from the prior year. Recommendation: We recommend increased internal monitoring to ensure that noncompetitive procurements are sufficiently justified, and that internal Sole Source Justification Forms are completed correctly and retained for all vendors procured under noncompetitive methods. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Award requires compliance with the provisions of procurement. Specifically, §200.318 General procurement standards indicates “the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include but are not necessarily limited to the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price.” In addition, Uniform Grant Guidance (2 CFR 200.303) requires nonfederal entities receiving Federal awards establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal laws, regulations, and program compliance requirements. Condition: A selection of procurements did not maintain sufficient documentation that detailed the history of the procurement and justification for using non-competitive practices. Questioned costs: Known questioned costs of $23,890. (NA21NMF4370552 = $4,650, NA22NMF4370355 = $12,440, NA22NMF4360330 = $6,800) Context: In a statistically valid sample, three of forty procurement selections tested, did not have sufficient documentation to justify their acquisition method. One item related to purchase decisions dictated by a subrecipient; however the payment was made directly by the Commission and no justification showing an adequate procurement process was provided by the subrecipient. Two selections related to procurements with a long-standing vendor which was used as the justification for selection, however no documentation was provided for the justification to continue using this vendor. Cause: Insufficient understanding and application of procurement policies when unusual situations arise. Effect: Noncompliance could lead the Commission to enter into contracts with vendors that are not the most suitable for the goods and/or services being procured. Repeat finding: Yes – see finding 2022-001 from the prior year. Recommendation: We recommend increased internal monitoring to ensure that noncompetitive procurements are sufficiently justified, and that internal Sole Source Justification Forms are completed correctly and retained for all vendors procured under noncompetitive methods. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Award requires compliance with the provisions of procurement. Specifically, §200.318 General procurement standards indicates “the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include but are not necessarily limited to the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price.” In addition, Uniform Grant Guidance (2 CFR 200.303) requires nonfederal entities receiving Federal awards establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal laws, regulations, and program compliance requirements. Condition: A selection of procurements did not maintain sufficient documentation that detailed the history of the procurement and justification for using non-competitive practices. Questioned costs: Known questioned costs of $23,890. (NA21NMF4370552 = $4,650, NA22NMF4370355 = $12,440, NA22NMF4360330 = $6,800) Context: In a statistically valid sample, three of forty procurement selections tested, did not have sufficient documentation to justify their acquisition method. One item related to purchase decisions dictated by a subrecipient; however the payment was made directly by the Commission and no justification showing an adequate procurement process was provided by the subrecipient. Two selections related to procurements with a long-standing vendor which was used as the justification for selection, however no documentation was provided for the justification to continue using this vendor. Cause: Insufficient understanding and application of procurement policies when unusual situations arise. Effect: Noncompliance could lead the Commission to enter into contracts with vendors that are not the most suitable for the goods and/or services being procured. Repeat finding: Yes – see finding 2022-001 from the prior year. Recommendation: We recommend increased internal monitoring to ensure that noncompetitive procurements are sufficiently justified, and that internal Sole Source Justification Forms are completed correctly and retained for all vendors procured under noncompetitive methods. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Award requires compliance with the provisions of procurement. Specifically, §200.318 General procurement standards indicates “the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include but are not necessarily limited to the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price.” In addition, Uniform Grant Guidance (2 CFR 200.303) requires nonfederal entities receiving Federal awards establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal laws, regulations, and program compliance requirements. Condition: A selection of procurements did not maintain sufficient documentation that detailed the history of the procurement and justification for using non-competitive practices. Questioned costs: Known questioned costs of $23,890. (NA21NMF4370552 = $4,650, NA22NMF4370355 = $12,440, NA22NMF4360330 = $6,800) Context: In a statistically valid sample, three of forty procurement selections tested, did not have sufficient documentation to justify their acquisition method. One item related to purchase decisions dictated by a subrecipient; however the payment was made directly by the Commission and no justification showing an adequate procurement process was provided by the subrecipient. Two selections related to procurements with a long-standing vendor which was used as the justification for selection, however no documentation was provided for the justification to continue using this vendor. Cause: Insufficient understanding and application of procurement policies when unusual situations arise. Effect: Noncompliance could lead the Commission to enter into contracts with vendors that are not the most suitable for the goods and/or services being procured. Repeat finding: Yes – see finding 2022-001 from the prior year. Recommendation: We recommend increased internal monitoring to ensure that noncompetitive procurements are sufficiently justified, and that internal Sole Source Justification Forms are completed correctly and retained for all vendors procured under noncompetitive methods. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Award requires compliance with the provisions of procurement. Specifically, §200.318 General procurement standards indicates “the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include but are not necessarily limited to the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price.” In addition, Uniform Grant Guidance (2 CFR 200.303) requires nonfederal entities receiving Federal awards establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal laws, regulations, and program compliance requirements. Condition: A selection of procurements did not maintain sufficient documentation that detailed the history of the procurement and justification for using non-competitive practices. Questioned costs: Known questioned costs of $23,890. (NA21NMF4370552 = $4,650, NA22NMF4370355 = $12,440, NA22NMF4360330 = $6,800) Context: In a statistically valid sample, three of forty procurement selections tested, did not have sufficient documentation to justify their acquisition method. One item related to purchase decisions dictated by a subrecipient; however the payment was made directly by the Commission and no justification showing an adequate procurement process was provided by the subrecipient. Two selections related to procurements with a long-standing vendor which was used as the justification for selection, however no documentation was provided for the justification to continue using this vendor. Cause: Insufficient understanding and application of procurement policies when unusual situations arise. Effect: Noncompliance could lead the Commission to enter into contracts with vendors that are not the most suitable for the goods and/or services being procured. Repeat finding: Yes – see finding 2022-001 from the prior year. Recommendation: We recommend increased internal monitoring to ensure that noncompetitive procurements are sufficiently justified, and that internal Sole Source Justification Forms are completed correctly and retained for all vendors procured under noncompetitive methods. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Award requires compliance with the provisions of procurement. Specifically, §200.318 General procurement standards indicates “the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include but are not necessarily limited to the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price.” In addition, Uniform Grant Guidance (2 CFR 200.303) requires nonfederal entities receiving Federal awards establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal laws, regulations, and program compliance requirements. Condition: A selection of procurements did not maintain sufficient documentation that detailed the history of the procurement and justification for using non-competitive practices. Questioned costs: Known questioned costs of $23,890. (NA21NMF4370552 = $4,650, NA22NMF4370355 = $12,440, NA22NMF4360330 = $6,800) Context: In a statistically valid sample, three of forty procurement selections tested, did not have sufficient documentation to justify their acquisition method. One item related to purchase decisions dictated by a subrecipient; however the payment was made directly by the Commission and no justification showing an adequate procurement process was provided by the subrecipient. Two selections related to procurements with a long-standing vendor which was used as the justification for selection, however no documentation was provided for the justification to continue using this vendor. Cause: Insufficient understanding and application of procurement policies when unusual situations arise. Effect: Noncompliance could lead the Commission to enter into contracts with vendors that are not the most suitable for the goods and/or services being procured. Repeat finding: Yes – see finding 2022-001 from the prior year. Recommendation: We recommend increased internal monitoring to ensure that noncompetitive procurements are sufficiently justified, and that internal Sole Source Justification Forms are completed correctly and retained for all vendors procured under noncompetitive methods. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Award requires compliance with the provisions of procurement. Specifically, §200.318 General procurement standards indicates “the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include but are not necessarily limited to the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price.” In addition, Uniform Grant Guidance (2 CFR 200.303) requires nonfederal entities receiving Federal awards establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal laws, regulations, and program compliance requirements. Condition: A selection of procurements did not maintain sufficient documentation that detailed the history of the procurement and justification for using non-competitive practices. Questioned costs: Known questioned costs of $23,890. (NA21NMF4370552 = $4,650, NA22NMF4370355 = $12,440, NA22NMF4360330 = $6,800) Context: In a statistically valid sample, three of forty procurement selections tested, did not have sufficient documentation to justify their acquisition method. One item related to purchase decisions dictated by a subrecipient; however the payment was made directly by the Commission and no justification showing an adequate procurement process was provided by the subrecipient. Two selections related to procurements with a long-standing vendor which was used as the justification for selection, however no documentation was provided for the justification to continue using this vendor. Cause: Insufficient understanding and application of procurement policies when unusual situations arise. Effect: Noncompliance could lead the Commission to enter into contracts with vendors that are not the most suitable for the goods and/or services being procured. Repeat finding: Yes – see finding 2022-001 from the prior year. Recommendation: We recommend increased internal monitoring to ensure that noncompetitive procurements are sufficiently justified, and that internal Sole Source Justification Forms are completed correctly and retained for all vendors procured under noncompetitive methods. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Award requires compliance with the provisions of procurement. Specifically, §200.318 General procurement standards indicates “the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include but are not necessarily limited to the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price.” In addition, Uniform Grant Guidance (2 CFR 200.303) requires nonfederal entities receiving Federal awards establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal laws, regulations, and program compliance requirements. Condition: A selection of procurements did not maintain sufficient documentation that detailed the history of the procurement and justification for using non-competitive practices. Questioned costs: Known questioned costs of $23,890. (NA21NMF4370552 = $4,650, NA22NMF4370355 = $12,440, NA22NMF4360330 = $6,800) Context: In a statistically valid sample, three of forty procurement selections tested, did not have sufficient documentation to justify their acquisition method. One item related to purchase decisions dictated by a subrecipient; however the payment was made directly by the Commission and no justification showing an adequate procurement process was provided by the subrecipient. Two selections related to procurements with a long-standing vendor which was used as the justification for selection, however no documentation was provided for the justification to continue using this vendor. Cause: Insufficient understanding and application of procurement policies when unusual situations arise. Effect: Noncompliance could lead the Commission to enter into contracts with vendors that are not the most suitable for the goods and/or services being procured. Repeat finding: Yes – see finding 2022-001 from the prior year. Recommendation: We recommend increased internal monitoring to ensure that noncompetitive procurements are sufficiently justified, and that internal Sole Source Justification Forms are completed correctly and retained for all vendors procured under noncompetitive methods. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Award requires compliance with the provisions of procurement. Specifically, §200.318 General procurement standards indicates “the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include but are not necessarily limited to the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price.” In addition, Uniform Grant Guidance (2 CFR 200.303) requires nonfederal entities receiving Federal awards establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal laws, regulations, and program compliance requirements. Condition: A selection of procurements did not maintain sufficient documentation that detailed the history of the procurement and justification for using non-competitive practices. Questioned costs: Known questioned costs of $23,890. (NA21NMF4370552 = $4,650, NA22NMF4370355 = $12,440, NA22NMF4360330 = $6,800) Context: In a statistically valid sample, three of forty procurement selections tested, did not have sufficient documentation to justify their acquisition method. One item related to purchase decisions dictated by a subrecipient; however the payment was made directly by the Commission and no justification showing an adequate procurement process was provided by the subrecipient. Two selections related to procurements with a long-standing vendor which was used as the justification for selection, however no documentation was provided for the justification to continue using this vendor. Cause: Insufficient understanding and application of procurement policies when unusual situations arise. Effect: Noncompliance could lead the Commission to enter into contracts with vendors that are not the most suitable for the goods and/or services being procured. Repeat finding: Yes – see finding 2022-001 from the prior year. Recommendation: We recommend increased internal monitoring to ensure that noncompetitive procurements are sufficiently justified, and that internal Sole Source Justification Forms are completed correctly and retained for all vendors procured under noncompetitive methods. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Award requires compliance with the provisions of procurement. Specifically, §200.318 General procurement standards indicates “the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include but are not necessarily limited to the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price.” In addition, Uniform Grant Guidance (2 CFR 200.303) requires nonfederal entities receiving Federal awards establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal laws, regulations, and program compliance requirements. Condition: A selection of procurements did not maintain sufficient documentation that detailed the history of the procurement and justification for using non-competitive practices. Questioned costs: Known questioned costs of $23,890. (NA21NMF4370552 = $4,650, NA22NMF4370355 = $12,440, NA22NMF4360330 = $6,800) Context: In a statistically valid sample, three of forty procurement selections tested, did not have sufficient documentation to justify their acquisition method. One item related to purchase decisions dictated by a subrecipient; however the payment was made directly by the Commission and no justification showing an adequate procurement process was provided by the subrecipient. Two selections related to procurements with a long-standing vendor which was used as the justification for selection, however no documentation was provided for the justification to continue using this vendor. Cause: Insufficient understanding and application of procurement policies when unusual situations arise. Effect: Noncompliance could lead the Commission to enter into contracts with vendors that are not the most suitable for the goods and/or services being procured. Repeat finding: Yes – see finding 2022-001 from the prior year. Recommendation: We recommend increased internal monitoring to ensure that noncompetitive procurements are sufficiently justified, and that internal Sole Source Justification Forms are completed correctly and retained for all vendors procured under noncompetitive methods. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Award requires compliance with the provisions of procurement. Specifically, §200.318 General procurement standards indicates “the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include but are not necessarily limited to the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price.” In addition, Uniform Grant Guidance (2 CFR 200.303) requires nonfederal entities receiving Federal awards establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal laws, regulations, and program compliance requirements. Condition: A selection of procurements did not maintain sufficient documentation that detailed the history of the procurement and justification for using non-competitive practices. Questioned costs: Known questioned costs of $23,890. (NA21NMF4370552 = $4,650, NA22NMF4370355 = $12,440, NA22NMF4360330 = $6,800) Context: In a statistically valid sample, three of forty procurement selections tested, did not have sufficient documentation to justify their acquisition method. One item related to purchase decisions dictated by a subrecipient; however the payment was made directly by the Commission and no justification showing an adequate procurement process was provided by the subrecipient. Two selections related to procurements with a long-standing vendor which was used as the justification for selection, however no documentation was provided for the justification to continue using this vendor. Cause: Insufficient understanding and application of procurement policies when unusual situations arise. Effect: Noncompliance could lead the Commission to enter into contracts with vendors that are not the most suitable for the goods and/or services being procured. Repeat finding: Yes – see finding 2022-001 from the prior year. Recommendation: We recommend increased internal monitoring to ensure that noncompetitive procurements are sufficiently justified, and that internal Sole Source Justification Forms are completed correctly and retained for all vendors procured under noncompetitive methods. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Award requires compliance with the provisions of procurement. Specifically, §200.318 General procurement standards indicates “the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include but are not necessarily limited to the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price.” In addition, Uniform Grant Guidance (2 CFR 200.303) requires nonfederal entities receiving Federal awards establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal laws, regulations, and program compliance requirements. Condition: A selection of procurements did not maintain sufficient documentation that detailed the history of the procurement and justification for using non-competitive practices. Questioned costs: Known questioned costs of $23,890. (NA21NMF4370552 = $4,650, NA22NMF4370355 = $12,440, NA22NMF4360330 = $6,800) Context: In a statistically valid sample, three of forty procurement selections tested, did not have sufficient documentation to justify their acquisition method. One item related to purchase decisions dictated by a subrecipient; however the payment was made directly by the Commission and no justification showing an adequate procurement process was provided by the subrecipient. Two selections related to procurements with a long-standing vendor which was used as the justification for selection, however no documentation was provided for the justification to continue using this vendor. Cause: Insufficient understanding and application of procurement policies when unusual situations arise. Effect: Noncompliance could lead the Commission to enter into contracts with vendors that are not the most suitable for the goods and/or services being procured. Repeat finding: Yes – see finding 2022-001 from the prior year. Recommendation: We recommend increased internal monitoring to ensure that noncompetitive procurements are sufficiently justified, and that internal Sole Source Justification Forms are completed correctly and retained for all vendors procured under noncompetitive methods. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Award requires compliance with the provisions of procurement. Specifically, §200.318 General procurement standards indicates “the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include but are not necessarily limited to the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price.” In addition, Uniform Grant Guidance (2 CFR 200.303) requires nonfederal entities receiving Federal awards establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal laws, regulations, and program compliance requirements. Condition: A selection of procurements did not maintain sufficient documentation that detailed the history of the procurement and justification for using non-competitive practices. Questioned costs: Known questioned costs of $23,890. (NA21NMF4370552 = $4,650, NA22NMF4370355 = $12,440, NA22NMF4360330 = $6,800) Context: In a statistically valid sample, three of forty procurement selections tested, did not have sufficient documentation to justify their acquisition method. One item related to purchase decisions dictated by a subrecipient; however the payment was made directly by the Commission and no justification showing an adequate procurement process was provided by the subrecipient. Two selections related to procurements with a long-standing vendor which was used as the justification for selection, however no documentation was provided for the justification to continue using this vendor. Cause: Insufficient understanding and application of procurement policies when unusual situations arise. Effect: Noncompliance could lead the Commission to enter into contracts with vendors that are not the most suitable for the goods and/or services being procured. Repeat finding: Yes – see finding 2022-001 from the prior year. Recommendation: We recommend increased internal monitoring to ensure that noncompetitive procurements are sufficiently justified, and that internal Sole Source Justification Forms are completed correctly and retained for all vendors procured under noncompetitive methods. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Award requires compliance with the provisions of procurement. Specifically, §200.318 General procurement standards indicates “the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include but are not necessarily limited to the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price.” In addition, Uniform Grant Guidance (2 CFR 200.303) requires nonfederal entities receiving Federal awards establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal laws, regulations, and program compliance requirements. Condition: A selection of procurements did not maintain sufficient documentation that detailed the history of the procurement and justification for using non-competitive practices. Questioned costs: Known questioned costs of $23,890. (NA21NMF4370552 = $4,650, NA22NMF4370355 = $12,440, NA22NMF4360330 = $6,800) Context: In a statistically valid sample, three of forty procurement selections tested, did not have sufficient documentation to justify their acquisition method. One item related to purchase decisions dictated by a subrecipient; however the payment was made directly by the Commission and no justification showing an adequate procurement process was provided by the subrecipient. Two selections related to procurements with a long-standing vendor which was used as the justification for selection, however no documentation was provided for the justification to continue using this vendor. Cause: Insufficient understanding and application of procurement policies when unusual situations arise. Effect: Noncompliance could lead the Commission to enter into contracts with vendors that are not the most suitable for the goods and/or services being procured. Repeat finding: Yes – see finding 2022-001 from the prior year. Recommendation: We recommend increased internal monitoring to ensure that noncompetitive procurements are sufficiently justified, and that internal Sole Source Justification Forms are completed correctly and retained for all vendors procured under noncompetitive methods. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Award requires compliance with the provisions of procurement. Specifically, §200.318 General procurement standards indicates “the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include but are not necessarily limited to the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price.” In addition, Uniform Grant Guidance (2 CFR 200.303) requires nonfederal entities receiving Federal awards establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal laws, regulations, and program compliance requirements. Condition: A selection of procurements did not maintain sufficient documentation that detailed the history of the procurement and justification for using non-competitive practices. Questioned costs: Known questioned costs of $23,890. (NA21NMF4370552 = $4,650, NA22NMF4370355 = $12,440, NA22NMF4360330 = $6,800) Context: In a statistically valid sample, three of forty procurement selections tested, did not have sufficient documentation to justify their acquisition method. One item related to purchase decisions dictated by a subrecipient; however the payment was made directly by the Commission and no justification showing an adequate procurement process was provided by the subrecipient. Two selections related to procurements with a long-standing vendor which was used as the justification for selection, however no documentation was provided for the justification to continue using this vendor. Cause: Insufficient understanding and application of procurement policies when unusual situations arise. Effect: Noncompliance could lead the Commission to enter into contracts with vendors that are not the most suitable for the goods and/or services being procured. Repeat finding: Yes – see finding 2022-001 from the prior year. Recommendation: We recommend increased internal monitoring to ensure that noncompetitive procurements are sufficiently justified, and that internal Sole Source Justification Forms are completed correctly and retained for all vendors procured under noncompetitive methods. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.