Findings Citing § 200.318

Condition: The Organization purchased property and services without implementing procedures that comply with procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Criteria: Non-Federal entities other than States, including those operating Federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable State and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200. Cause: The Organization did not use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable State and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200. Effect: The Organization did not comply with procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200. Context: A sample of 5 purchases totaling $37,971 was selected for audit from a population of 21 purchases totaling $284,550. The test found that five purchases did not adhere to the Organization's documented procurement procedures and 1 purchase that also did not include competitive bidding. Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization use their own documented procurement procedures that comply with procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding.

The U. S. Code of Federal Regulations Title 2, Part 200.318, of the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) states that non-Federal entities must have and use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect State and local laws and regulations provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal law and the standards identified within that section. The Code of Alabama 1975, Section 16-13B-1, requires boards of education to competitively bid the labor, services, work, or the purchase of materials, equipment, supplies, or other personal property involving forty thousand dollars ($40,000.00) or more. In addition, the U. S. Code of Federal Regulations Title 2, Part 200.320, of the Uniform Guidance states that non-Federal entities must have and use documented procurement procedures and that when purchases are made that exceed the simplified acquisition threshold defined in the Uniform Guidance formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods include sealed bids, competitive proposals, and, in specific circumstances, noncompetitive proposals. Furthermore, the U. S. Code of Federal Regulations Title 2, Part 200.324, of the Uniform Guidance states that the non-Federal entity must perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold including contract modifications. The Mobile County Board of School Commissioners (the “Board”) entered into a contract for STEM classroom services for $572,265.00 using COVID-19 Education Stabilization Funds without obtaining bids in accordance with State of Alabama Bid Law or performing a cost or price analysis. The Board did not maintain adequate documentation for utilizing the noncompetitive procurement method. The Board did not follow their procurement policies, State Bid Laws, or the Uniform Guidance regarding this purchase. As a result, the Board did not comply with the Uniform Guidance procurement requirements. Recommendation: The Board should ensure compliance with the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) 2 CFR 200.318, CFR 200.320, and CFR 200.324 and the Code of Alabama 1975, 16-13B-1.

The U. S. Code of Federal Regulations Title 2, Part 200.318, of the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) states that non-Federal entities must have and use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect State and local laws and regulations provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal law and the standards identified within that section. The Code of Alabama 1975, Section 16-13B-1, requires boards of education to competitively bid the labor, services, work, or the purchase of materials, equipment, supplies, or other personal property involving forty thousand dollars ($40,000.00) or more. In addition, the U. S. Code of Federal Regulations Title 2, Part 200.320, of the Uniform Guidance states that non-Federal entities must have and use documented procurement procedures and that when purchases are made that exceed the simplified acquisition threshold defined in the Uniform Guidance formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods include sealed bids, competitive proposals, and, in specific circumstances, noncompetitive proposals. Furthermore, the U. S. Code of Federal Regulations Title 2, Part 200.324, of the Uniform Guidance states that the non-Federal entity must perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold including contract modifications. The Mobile County Board of School Commissioners (the “Board”) entered into a contract for STEM classroom services for $572,265.00 using COVID-19 Education Stabilization Funds without obtaining bids in accordance with State of Alabama Bid Law or performing a cost or price analysis. The Board did not maintain adequate documentation for utilizing the noncompetitive procurement method. The Board did not follow their procurement policies, State Bid Laws, or the Uniform Guidance regarding this purchase. As a result, the Board did not comply with the Uniform Guidance procurement requirements. Recommendation: The Board should ensure compliance with the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) 2 CFR 200.318, CFR 200.320, and CFR 200.324 and the Code of Alabama 1975, 16-13B-1.

The U. S. Code of Federal Regulations Title 2, Part 200.318, of the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) states that non-Federal entities must have and use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect State and local laws and regulations provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal law and the standards identified within that section. The Code of Alabama 1975, Section 16-13B-1, requires boards of education to competitively bid the labor, services, work, or the purchase of materials, equipment, supplies, or other personal property involving forty thousand dollars ($40,000.00) or more. In addition, the U. S. Code of Federal Regulations Title 2, Part 200.320, of the Uniform Guidance states that non-Federal entities must have and use documented procurement procedures and that when purchases are made that exceed the simplified acquisition threshold defined in the Uniform Guidance formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods include sealed bids, competitive proposals, and, in specific circumstances, noncompetitive proposals. Furthermore, the U. S. Code of Federal Regulations Title 2, Part 200.324, of the Uniform Guidance states that the non-Federal entity must perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold including contract modifications. The Mobile County Board of School Commissioners (the “Board”) entered into a contract for STEM classroom services for $572,265.00 using COVID-19 Education Stabilization Funds without obtaining bids in accordance with State of Alabama Bid Law or performing a cost or price analysis. The Board did not maintain adequate documentation for utilizing the noncompetitive procurement method. The Board did not follow their procurement policies, State Bid Laws, or the Uniform Guidance regarding this purchase. As a result, the Board did not comply with the Uniform Guidance procurement requirements. Recommendation: The Board should ensure compliance with the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) 2 CFR 200.318, CFR 200.320, and CFR 200.324 and the Code of Alabama 1975, 16-13B-1.

The U. S. Code of Federal Regulations Title 2, Part 200.318, of the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) states that non-Federal entities must have and use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect State and local laws and regulations provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal law and the standards identified within that section. The Code of Alabama 1975, Section 16-13B-1, requires boards of education to competitively bid the labor, services, work, or the purchase of materials, equipment, supplies, or other personal property involving forty thousand dollars ($40,000.00) or more. In addition, the U. S. Code of Federal Regulations Title 2, Part 200.320, of the Uniform Guidance states that non-Federal entities must have and use documented procurement procedures and that when purchases are made that exceed the simplified acquisition threshold defined in the Uniform Guidance formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods include sealed bids, competitive proposals, and, in specific circumstances, noncompetitive proposals. Furthermore, the U. S. Code of Federal Regulations Title 2, Part 200.324, of the Uniform Guidance states that the non-Federal entity must perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold including contract modifications. The Mobile County Board of School Commissioners (the “Board”) entered into a contract for STEM classroom services for $572,265.00 using COVID-19 Education Stabilization Funds without obtaining bids in accordance with State of Alabama Bid Law or performing a cost or price analysis. The Board did not maintain adequate documentation for utilizing the noncompetitive procurement method. The Board did not follow their procurement policies, State Bid Laws, or the Uniform Guidance regarding this purchase. As a result, the Board did not comply with the Uniform Guidance procurement requirements. Recommendation: The Board should ensure compliance with the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) 2 CFR 200.318, CFR 200.320, and CFR 200.324 and the Code of Alabama 1975, 16-13B-1.

Finding 2023-004: Procurement Information About the Program: All Programs Criteria: According to 2 CFR §200.303, the non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non- Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the internal Control Integrated Framework, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Additionally, according to 2 CFR §200.318 Procurement standards, the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Title 2, Subtitle A Chapter II Part 200 Subpart D 200.319 Procurement Standards. All procurement transactions for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award must be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition consistent with the standards of this section and §200.320. The non-Federal entity must have written procedures for procurement transactions. These procedures must ensure that all solicitations: (1) Incorporate a clear and accurate description of the technical requirements for the material, product, or service to be procured. Such description must not, in competitive procurements, contain features which unduly restrict competition. The description may include a statement of the qualitative nature of the material, product or service to be procured and, when necessary, must set forth those minimum essential characteristics and standards to which it must conform if it is to satisfy its intended use. Noncompetitive procurements can only be awarded in accordance with §200.320(c). According to 2 CFR §200.320 Procurement Standards, there are specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. Noncompetitive procurement can only be awarded if one or more of the following circumstances apply: 1. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold (see paragraph (a)(1) of this section); 2. The item is available only from a single source; 3. The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from publicizing a competitive solicitation; 4. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity expressly authorizes a noncompetitive procurement in response to a written request from the non-Federal entity; or 5. After solicitation of a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate. Condition: During our testing over procurement, we determined NFHA did not clearly document the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. In addition, for noncompetitive procurements, there was no documentation to support which of the five criteria was met to allow for the noncompetitive procurement. Cause: Management did not have effective internal controls in place to ensure that procurement requirements were adequately documented and retained. Effect: Procurement records were insufficient to meet the requirements noted in the Criteria section above, as well as NFHA's internal procurement policy. Questioned Costs: None. Context: We noted that several items selected for testing did not document the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. In addition, we noted that several items selected for testing for noncompetitive procurements did not maintain documentation of which of the five criteria were met to allow for the noncompetitive procurement. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Not applicable. Recommendation: We recommend NFHA update its policies to treat Federal and non-Federal procurement the same and ensure compliance with Uniform Guidance. NFHA should retain sufficient procurement documentation to meet the requirements noted in the Criteria section above.

Finding 2023-004: Procurement Information About the Program: All Programs Criteria: According to 2 CFR §200.303, the non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non- Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the internal Control Integrated Framework, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Additionally, according to 2 CFR §200.318 Procurement standards, the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Title 2, Subtitle A Chapter II Part 200 Subpart D 200.319 Procurement Standards. All procurement transactions for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award must be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition consistent with the standards of this section and §200.320. The non-Federal entity must have written procedures for procurement transactions. These procedures must ensure that all solicitations: (1) Incorporate a clear and accurate description of the technical requirements for the material, product, or service to be procured. Such description must not, in competitive procurements, contain features which unduly restrict competition. The description may include a statement of the qualitative nature of the material, product or service to be procured and, when necessary, must set forth those minimum essential characteristics and standards to which it must conform if it is to satisfy its intended use. Noncompetitive procurements can only be awarded in accordance with §200.320(c). According to 2 CFR §200.320 Procurement Standards, there are specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. Noncompetitive procurement can only be awarded if one or more of the following circumstances apply: 1. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold (see paragraph (a)(1) of this section); 2. The item is available only from a single source; 3. The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from publicizing a competitive solicitation; 4. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity expressly authorizes a noncompetitive procurement in response to a written request from the non-Federal entity; or 5. After solicitation of a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate. Condition: During our testing over procurement, we determined NFHA did not clearly document the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. In addition, for noncompetitive procurements, there was no documentation to support which of the five criteria was met to allow for the noncompetitive procurement. Cause: Management did not have effective internal controls in place to ensure that procurement requirements were adequately documented and retained. Effect: Procurement records were insufficient to meet the requirements noted in the Criteria section above, as well as NFHA's internal procurement policy. Questioned Costs: None. Context: We noted that several items selected for testing did not document the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. In addition, we noted that several items selected for testing for noncompetitive procurements did not maintain documentation of which of the five criteria were met to allow for the noncompetitive procurement. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Not applicable. Recommendation: We recommend NFHA update its policies to treat Federal and non-Federal procurement the same and ensure compliance with Uniform Guidance. NFHA should retain sufficient procurement documentation to meet the requirements noted in the Criteria section above.

Finding 2023-004: Procurement Information About the Program: All Programs Criteria: According to 2 CFR §200.303, the non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non- Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the internal Control Integrated Framework, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Additionally, according to 2 CFR §200.318 Procurement standards, the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Title 2, Subtitle A Chapter II Part 200 Subpart D 200.319 Procurement Standards. All procurement transactions for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award must be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition consistent with the standards of this section and §200.320. The non-Federal entity must have written procedures for procurement transactions. These procedures must ensure that all solicitations: (1) Incorporate a clear and accurate description of the technical requirements for the material, product, or service to be procured. Such description must not, in competitive procurements, contain features which unduly restrict competition. The description may include a statement of the qualitative nature of the material, product or service to be procured and, when necessary, must set forth those minimum essential characteristics and standards to which it must conform if it is to satisfy its intended use. Noncompetitive procurements can only be awarded in accordance with §200.320(c). According to 2 CFR §200.320 Procurement Standards, there are specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. Noncompetitive procurement can only be awarded if one or more of the following circumstances apply: 1. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold (see paragraph (a)(1) of this section); 2. The item is available only from a single source; 3. The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from publicizing a competitive solicitation; 4. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity expressly authorizes a noncompetitive procurement in response to a written request from the non-Federal entity; or 5. After solicitation of a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate. Condition: During our testing over procurement, we determined NFHA did not clearly document the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. In addition, for noncompetitive procurements, there was no documentation to support which of the five criteria was met to allow for the noncompetitive procurement. Cause: Management did not have effective internal controls in place to ensure that procurement requirements were adequately documented and retained. Effect: Procurement records were insufficient to meet the requirements noted in the Criteria section above, as well as NFHA's internal procurement policy. Questioned Costs: None. Context: We noted that several items selected for testing did not document the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. In addition, we noted that several items selected for testing for noncompetitive procurements did not maintain documentation of which of the five criteria were met to allow for the noncompetitive procurement. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Not applicable. Recommendation: We recommend NFHA update its policies to treat Federal and non-Federal procurement the same and ensure compliance with Uniform Guidance. NFHA should retain sufficient procurement documentation to meet the requirements noted in the Criteria section above.

Federal Aid Policies Finding 2023-002 Condition: The Authority’s management has completely turned over and been restructured. However, the Authority’s policies for federal aid approved in 2021 have not been revised to update for the current management structure. The policies have also not been updated for changes in the 2 CFR 200 that have occurred. Criteria: The 2 CFR 200 requires the adoption of federal aid policies and that they are to be updated and maintained in accordance with the federal regulations. These policies include the following along with the 2 CFR 200 reference. a. Cash Management Procedure –200.302(b)(6) and 200.305 b. Cost Allowability Procedures –200.302(b)(7) c. Conflicts of Interest Policy –200.318(c) d. Procurement Procedures –200.318(a) and 200.319(d) e. Method for Conducting Technical Evaluations of Proposals and Selecting Recipients –200.320(b)(2)(ii) f. Travel Policy –200.475(a) g. Procedures for Managing Equipment –200.313(d) h. Employee Benefits –200.431 Cause: The Authority has experienced a high turnover of employees since 2021 when the policies were adopted and have not been reviewed since their adoption. Effect: The Authority is noncompliant with 2 CFR 200. Directive: We direct the Authority review and update all federal aid policies and implement procedures to ensure that they are being reviewed at least once a year for changes in the Authority’s management structure or changes that occur in the 2 CFR 200. Management’s Response--Corrective Action Plan: Contact person is Rufus Adams, Executive Director, 275 East Wall Street, P.O. Box 837, Benton Harbor, Michigan 49023. Telephone (269) 927-2268. The Authority will update their federal policies to comply with 2 CFR 200 and will review all policies on an annual basis going forward.

Federal Aid Policies Finding 2023-002 Condition: The Authority’s management has completely turned over and been restructured. However, the Authority’s policies for federal aid approved in 2021 have not been revised to update for the current management structure. The policies have also not been updated for changes in the 2 CFR 200 that have occurred. Criteria: The 2 CFR 200 requires the adoption of federal aid policies and that they are to be updated and maintained in accordance with the federal regulations. These policies include the following along with the 2 CFR 200 reference. a. Cash Management Procedure –200.302(b)(6) and 200.305 b. Cost Allowability Procedures –200.302(b)(7) c. Conflicts of Interest Policy –200.318(c) d. Procurement Procedures –200.318(a) and 200.319(d) e. Method for Conducting Technical Evaluations of Proposals and Selecting Recipients –200.320(b)(2)(ii) f. Travel Policy –200.475(a) g. Procedures for Managing Equipment –200.313(d) h. Employee Benefits –200.431 Cause: The Authority has experienced a high turnover of employees since 2021 when the policies were adopted and have not been reviewed since their adoption. Effect: The Authority is noncompliant with 2 CFR 200. Directive: We direct the Authority review and update all federal aid policies and implement procedures to ensure that they are being reviewed at least once a year for changes in the Authority’s management structure or changes that occur in the 2 CFR 200. Management’s Response--Corrective Action Plan: Contact person is Rufus Adams, Executive Director, 275 East Wall Street, P.O. Box 837, Benton Harbor, Michigan 49023. Telephone (269) 927-2268. The Authority will update their federal policies to comply with 2 CFR 200 and will review all policies on an annual basis going forward.

Federal Aid Policies Finding 2023-002 Condition: The Authority’s management has completely turned over and been restructured. However, the Authority’s policies for federal aid approved in 2021 have not been revised to update for the current management structure. The policies have also not been updated for changes in the 2 CFR 200 that have occurred. Criteria: The 2 CFR 200 requires the adoption of federal aid policies and that they are to be updated and maintained in accordance with the federal regulations. These policies include the following along with the 2 CFR 200 reference. a. Cash Management Procedure –200.302(b)(6) and 200.305 b. Cost Allowability Procedures –200.302(b)(7) c. Conflicts of Interest Policy –200.318(c) d. Procurement Procedures –200.318(a) and 200.319(d) e. Method for Conducting Technical Evaluations of Proposals and Selecting Recipients –200.320(b)(2)(ii) f. Travel Policy –200.475(a) g. Procedures for Managing Equipment –200.313(d) h. Employee Benefits –200.431 Cause: The Authority has experienced a high turnover of employees since 2021 when the policies were adopted and have not been reviewed since their adoption. Effect: The Authority is noncompliant with 2 CFR 200. Directive: We direct the Authority review and update all federal aid policies and implement procedures to ensure that they are being reviewed at least once a year for changes in the Authority’s management structure or changes that occur in the 2 CFR 200. Management’s Response--Corrective Action Plan: Contact person is Rufus Adams, Executive Director, 275 East Wall Street, P.O. Box 837, Benton Harbor, Michigan 49023. Telephone (269) 927-2268. The Authority will update their federal policies to comply with 2 CFR 200 and will review all policies on an annual basis going forward.

Federal Aid Policies Finding 2023-002 Condition: The Authority’s management has completely turned over and been restructured. However, the Authority’s policies for federal aid approved in 2021 have not been revised to update for the current management structure. The policies have also not been updated for changes in the 2 CFR 200 that have occurred. Criteria: The 2 CFR 200 requires the adoption of federal aid policies and that they are to be updated and maintained in accordance with the federal regulations. These policies include the following along with the 2 CFR 200 reference. a. Cash Management Procedure –200.302(b)(6) and 200.305 b. Cost Allowability Procedures –200.302(b)(7) c. Conflicts of Interest Policy –200.318(c) d. Procurement Procedures –200.318(a) and 200.319(d) e. Method for Conducting Technical Evaluations of Proposals and Selecting Recipients –200.320(b)(2)(ii) f. Travel Policy –200.475(a) g. Procedures for Managing Equipment –200.313(d) h. Employee Benefits –200.431 Cause: The Authority has experienced a high turnover of employees since 2021 when the policies were adopted and have not been reviewed since their adoption. Effect: The Authority is noncompliant with 2 CFR 200. Directive: We direct the Authority review and update all federal aid policies and implement procedures to ensure that they are being reviewed at least once a year for changes in the Authority’s management structure or changes that occur in the 2 CFR 200. Management’s Response--Corrective Action Plan: Contact person is Rufus Adams, Executive Director, 275 East Wall Street, P.O. Box 837, Benton Harbor, Michigan 49023. Telephone (269) 927-2268. The Authority will update their federal policies to comply with 2 CFR 200 and will review all policies on an annual basis going forward.

Federal Aid Policies Finding 2023-002 Condition: The Authority’s management has completely turned over and been restructured. However, the Authority’s policies for federal aid approved in 2021 have not been revised to update for the current management structure. The policies have also not been updated for changes in the 2 CFR 200 that have occurred. Criteria: The 2 CFR 200 requires the adoption of federal aid policies and that they are to be updated and maintained in accordance with the federal regulations. These policies include the following along with the 2 CFR 200 reference. a. Cash Management Procedure –200.302(b)(6) and 200.305 b. Cost Allowability Procedures –200.302(b)(7) c. Conflicts of Interest Policy –200.318(c) d. Procurement Procedures –200.318(a) and 200.319(d) e. Method for Conducting Technical Evaluations of Proposals and Selecting Recipients –200.320(b)(2)(ii) f. Travel Policy –200.475(a) g. Procedures for Managing Equipment –200.313(d) h. Employee Benefits –200.431 Cause: The Authority has experienced a high turnover of employees since 2021 when the policies were adopted and have not been reviewed since their adoption. Effect: The Authority is noncompliant with 2 CFR 200. Directive: We direct the Authority review and update all federal aid policies and implement procedures to ensure that they are being reviewed at least once a year for changes in the Authority’s management structure or changes that occur in the 2 CFR 200. Management’s Response--Corrective Action Plan: Contact person is Rufus Adams, Executive Director, 275 East Wall Street, P.O. Box 837, Benton Harbor, Michigan 49023. Telephone (269) 927-2268. The Authority will update their federal policies to comply with 2 CFR 200 and will review all policies on an annual basis going forward.

Failure to Follow Procurement Policy Finding 2023-003 Condition: The Authority did not comply with the current procurement policy as procedures were not fully followed and forms required by the Authority’s procurement policy were not completed. The following forms required by either 2 CFR 200 and/or the Authority’s own procurement policy were not completed for the current year capital asset purchases: Written Record of Procurement Checklist Form, Method of Procurement Decision Matrix, Advertisement and Solicitation Form, Bid Quotations, Fewer Than 3 Offers Received Evaluation if applicable, Proposal Tabulation, Certification of Compliance with Federal Clauses for the assets less than $25,000, and Responsibility Determination (sam.gov debarred verification). Also, as stated in the prior finding, the procurement policy needs to be updated. Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.214 Suspension and Debarment, Non-Federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. The following excerpts are from 2 CFR Part 200.318 General Procurement Standards. (a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. (i) the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. According to 2 CFR 200.320 Methods of Procurement to be Followed, the non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. Concurrently, the Authority’s did not comply with its own current procurement policy as it did not follow or prepare the required documentation detailed in the following sections. Procurement Requests-The Authority will maintain sufficient records to detail the history of a procurement. Such records shall include method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection (or rejection), and the contract price. The Authority will treat any prospective contractor or sub-contractor listed on a centralized State government debarment and suspension list as nonresponsible and ineligible for contract award. Debarment and Suspension- The Authority will treat any prospective contractor or sub-contractor listed on a centralized State government debarment and suspension list as non-responsible and ineligible for contract awards. To see if a prospective contractor is eligible, we will look on the website www.SAM.gov and when the bid has been received. Methods of Procurement- a. Micro and Emergency Purchases (do not exceed $10,000)-(a) A written determination as to why price is deemed fair and reasonable must be on file with each purchase made under this method of procurement using Micro-Purchase Price Reasonableness Determination Form. (b) Splitting of procurements to avoid the competitive procurement requirements of federal and state statues shall not be condoned. b. Small Purchase Procurement ($10,000 to $250,000)-(a) A minimum of two price or rate quotations shall be obtained from qualified sources; (b) The procurement will be made from the lowest priced qualified bid, if products or goods are equal; (c) MDOT requires for procurements under $25,000.00. Included Procurement Appendix A, B, E, F, G, H, or I and Vehicle Specification certification if applies. (d) MDOT requires for procurements over $25,000.00 solicitations, including specifications and written selection procedures (lowest bids), Include Procurement Appendix A, F, G, H or I and Vehicle Specification certification if applies. Third Party Contracts with applicable clauses and bond documents must be included. Cause: The Authority did not follow its own procurement policy. Effect: The Authority is noncompliant with 2 CFR 200 and its own procurement policy. Directive: We direct the Authority review and update its procurement policy and implement procedures to ensure that the Authority is complying with the federal requirements, required forms are being completed, and documentation is being maintained. Management’s Response--Corrective Action Plan: Contact person is Rufus Adams, Executive Director, 275 East Wall Street, P.O. Box 837, Benton Harbor, Michigan 49023. Telephone (269) 927-2268. The Authority will review and update its procurement policy to comply with federal requirements. The Authority’s management, consultant, and finance director will review the procedures in the policy to ensure they are being acted upon accordingly going forward.

Failure to Follow Procurement Policy Finding 2023-003 Condition: The Authority did not comply with the current procurement policy as procedures were not fully followed and forms required by the Authority’s procurement policy were not completed. The following forms required by either 2 CFR 200 and/or the Authority’s own procurement policy were not completed for the current year capital asset purchases: Written Record of Procurement Checklist Form, Method of Procurement Decision Matrix, Advertisement and Solicitation Form, Bid Quotations, Fewer Than 3 Offers Received Evaluation if applicable, Proposal Tabulation, Certification of Compliance with Federal Clauses for the assets less than $25,000, and Responsibility Determination (sam.gov debarred verification). Also, as stated in the prior finding, the procurement policy needs to be updated. Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.214 Suspension and Debarment, Non-Federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. The following excerpts are from 2 CFR Part 200.318 General Procurement Standards. (a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. (i) the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. According to 2 CFR 200.320 Methods of Procurement to be Followed, the non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. Concurrently, the Authority’s did not comply with its own current procurement policy as it did not follow or prepare the required documentation detailed in the following sections. Procurement Requests-The Authority will maintain sufficient records to detail the history of a procurement. Such records shall include method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection (or rejection), and the contract price. The Authority will treat any prospective contractor or sub-contractor listed on a centralized State government debarment and suspension list as nonresponsible and ineligible for contract award. Debarment and Suspension- The Authority will treat any prospective contractor or sub-contractor listed on a centralized State government debarment and suspension list as non-responsible and ineligible for contract awards. To see if a prospective contractor is eligible, we will look on the website www.SAM.gov and when the bid has been received. Methods of Procurement- a. Micro and Emergency Purchases (do not exceed $10,000)-(a) A written determination as to why price is deemed fair and reasonable must be on file with each purchase made under this method of procurement using Micro-Purchase Price Reasonableness Determination Form. (b) Splitting of procurements to avoid the competitive procurement requirements of federal and state statues shall not be condoned. b. Small Purchase Procurement ($10,000 to $250,000)-(a) A minimum of two price or rate quotations shall be obtained from qualified sources; (b) The procurement will be made from the lowest priced qualified bid, if products or goods are equal; (c) MDOT requires for procurements under $25,000.00. Included Procurement Appendix A, B, E, F, G, H, or I and Vehicle Specification certification if applies. (d) MDOT requires for procurements over $25,000.00 solicitations, including specifications and written selection procedures (lowest bids), Include Procurement Appendix A, F, G, H or I and Vehicle Specification certification if applies. Third Party Contracts with applicable clauses and bond documents must be included. Cause: The Authority did not follow its own procurement policy. Effect: The Authority is noncompliant with 2 CFR 200 and its own procurement policy. Directive: We direct the Authority review and update its procurement policy and implement procedures to ensure that the Authority is complying with the federal requirements, required forms are being completed, and documentation is being maintained. Management’s Response--Corrective Action Plan: Contact person is Rufus Adams, Executive Director, 275 East Wall Street, P.O. Box 837, Benton Harbor, Michigan 49023. Telephone (269) 927-2268. The Authority will review and update its procurement policy to comply with federal requirements. The Authority’s management, consultant, and finance director will review the procedures in the policy to ensure they are being acted upon accordingly going forward.

Failure to Follow Procurement Policy Finding 2023-003 Condition: The Authority did not comply with the current procurement policy as procedures were not fully followed and forms required by the Authority’s procurement policy were not completed. The following forms required by either 2 CFR 200 and/or the Authority’s own procurement policy were not completed for the current year capital asset purchases: Written Record of Procurement Checklist Form, Method of Procurement Decision Matrix, Advertisement and Solicitation Form, Bid Quotations, Fewer Than 3 Offers Received Evaluation if applicable, Proposal Tabulation, Certification of Compliance with Federal Clauses for the assets less than $25,000, and Responsibility Determination (sam.gov debarred verification). Also, as stated in the prior finding, the procurement policy needs to be updated. Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.214 Suspension and Debarment, Non-Federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. The following excerpts are from 2 CFR Part 200.318 General Procurement Standards. (a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. (i) the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. According to 2 CFR 200.320 Methods of Procurement to be Followed, the non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. Concurrently, the Authority’s did not comply with its own current procurement policy as it did not follow or prepare the required documentation detailed in the following sections. Procurement Requests-The Authority will maintain sufficient records to detail the history of a procurement. Such records shall include method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection (or rejection), and the contract price. The Authority will treat any prospective contractor or sub-contractor listed on a centralized State government debarment and suspension list as nonresponsible and ineligible for contract award. Debarment and Suspension- The Authority will treat any prospective contractor or sub-contractor listed on a centralized State government debarment and suspension list as non-responsible and ineligible for contract awards. To see if a prospective contractor is eligible, we will look on the website www.SAM.gov and when the bid has been received. Methods of Procurement- a. Micro and Emergency Purchases (do not exceed $10,000)-(a) A written determination as to why price is deemed fair and reasonable must be on file with each purchase made under this method of procurement using Micro-Purchase Price Reasonableness Determination Form. (b) Splitting of procurements to avoid the competitive procurement requirements of federal and state statues shall not be condoned. b. Small Purchase Procurement ($10,000 to $250,000)-(a) A minimum of two price or rate quotations shall be obtained from qualified sources; (b) The procurement will be made from the lowest priced qualified bid, if products or goods are equal; (c) MDOT requires for procurements under $25,000.00. Included Procurement Appendix A, B, E, F, G, H, or I and Vehicle Specification certification if applies. (d) MDOT requires for procurements over $25,000.00 solicitations, including specifications and written selection procedures (lowest bids), Include Procurement Appendix A, F, G, H or I and Vehicle Specification certification if applies. Third Party Contracts with applicable clauses and bond documents must be included. Cause: The Authority did not follow its own procurement policy. Effect: The Authority is noncompliant with 2 CFR 200 and its own procurement policy. Directive: We direct the Authority review and update its procurement policy and implement procedures to ensure that the Authority is complying with the federal requirements, required forms are being completed, and documentation is being maintained. Management’s Response--Corrective Action Plan: Contact person is Rufus Adams, Executive Director, 275 East Wall Street, P.O. Box 837, Benton Harbor, Michigan 49023. Telephone (269) 927-2268. The Authority will review and update its procurement policy to comply with federal requirements. The Authority’s management, consultant, and finance director will review the procedures in the policy to ensure they are being acted upon accordingly going forward.

Failure to Follow Procurement Policy Finding 2023-003 Condition: The Authority did not comply with the current procurement policy as procedures were not fully followed and forms required by the Authority’s procurement policy were not completed. The following forms required by either 2 CFR 200 and/or the Authority’s own procurement policy were not completed for the current year capital asset purchases: Written Record of Procurement Checklist Form, Method of Procurement Decision Matrix, Advertisement and Solicitation Form, Bid Quotations, Fewer Than 3 Offers Received Evaluation if applicable, Proposal Tabulation, Certification of Compliance with Federal Clauses for the assets less than $25,000, and Responsibility Determination (sam.gov debarred verification). Also, as stated in the prior finding, the procurement policy needs to be updated. Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.214 Suspension and Debarment, Non-Federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. The following excerpts are from 2 CFR Part 200.318 General Procurement Standards. (a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. (i) the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. According to 2 CFR 200.320 Methods of Procurement to be Followed, the non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. Concurrently, the Authority’s did not comply with its own current procurement policy as it did not follow or prepare the required documentation detailed in the following sections. Procurement Requests-The Authority will maintain sufficient records to detail the history of a procurement. Such records shall include method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection (or rejection), and the contract price. The Authority will treat any prospective contractor or sub-contractor listed on a centralized State government debarment and suspension list as nonresponsible and ineligible for contract award. Debarment and Suspension- The Authority will treat any prospective contractor or sub-contractor listed on a centralized State government debarment and suspension list as non-responsible and ineligible for contract awards. To see if a prospective contractor is eligible, we will look on the website www.SAM.gov and when the bid has been received. Methods of Procurement- a. Micro and Emergency Purchases (do not exceed $10,000)-(a) A written determination as to why price is deemed fair and reasonable must be on file with each purchase made under this method of procurement using Micro-Purchase Price Reasonableness Determination Form. (b) Splitting of procurements to avoid the competitive procurement requirements of federal and state statues shall not be condoned. b. Small Purchase Procurement ($10,000 to $250,000)-(a) A minimum of two price or rate quotations shall be obtained from qualified sources; (b) The procurement will be made from the lowest priced qualified bid, if products or goods are equal; (c) MDOT requires for procurements under $25,000.00. Included Procurement Appendix A, B, E, F, G, H, or I and Vehicle Specification certification if applies. (d) MDOT requires for procurements over $25,000.00 solicitations, including specifications and written selection procedures (lowest bids), Include Procurement Appendix A, F, G, H or I and Vehicle Specification certification if applies. Third Party Contracts with applicable clauses and bond documents must be included. Cause: The Authority did not follow its own procurement policy. Effect: The Authority is noncompliant with 2 CFR 200 and its own procurement policy. Directive: We direct the Authority review and update its procurement policy and implement procedures to ensure that the Authority is complying with the federal requirements, required forms are being completed, and documentation is being maintained. Management’s Response--Corrective Action Plan: Contact person is Rufus Adams, Executive Director, 275 East Wall Street, P.O. Box 837, Benton Harbor, Michigan 49023. Telephone (269) 927-2268. The Authority will review and update its procurement policy to comply with federal requirements. The Authority’s management, consultant, and finance director will review the procedures in the policy to ensure they are being acted upon accordingly going forward.

Failure to Follow Procurement Policy Finding 2023-003 Condition: The Authority did not comply with the current procurement policy as procedures were not fully followed and forms required by the Authority’s procurement policy were not completed. The following forms required by either 2 CFR 200 and/or the Authority’s own procurement policy were not completed for the current year capital asset purchases: Written Record of Procurement Checklist Form, Method of Procurement Decision Matrix, Advertisement and Solicitation Form, Bid Quotations, Fewer Than 3 Offers Received Evaluation if applicable, Proposal Tabulation, Certification of Compliance with Federal Clauses for the assets less than $25,000, and Responsibility Determination (sam.gov debarred verification). Also, as stated in the prior finding, the procurement policy needs to be updated. Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.214 Suspension and Debarment, Non-Federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. The following excerpts are from 2 CFR Part 200.318 General Procurement Standards. (a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. (i) the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. According to 2 CFR 200.320 Methods of Procurement to be Followed, the non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. Concurrently, the Authority’s did not comply with its own current procurement policy as it did not follow or prepare the required documentation detailed in the following sections. Procurement Requests-The Authority will maintain sufficient records to detail the history of a procurement. Such records shall include method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection (or rejection), and the contract price. The Authority will treat any prospective contractor or sub-contractor listed on a centralized State government debarment and suspension list as nonresponsible and ineligible for contract award. Debarment and Suspension- The Authority will treat any prospective contractor or sub-contractor listed on a centralized State government debarment and suspension list as non-responsible and ineligible for contract awards. To see if a prospective contractor is eligible, we will look on the website www.SAM.gov and when the bid has been received. Methods of Procurement- a. Micro and Emergency Purchases (do not exceed $10,000)-(a) A written determination as to why price is deemed fair and reasonable must be on file with each purchase made under this method of procurement using Micro-Purchase Price Reasonableness Determination Form. (b) Splitting of procurements to avoid the competitive procurement requirements of federal and state statues shall not be condoned. b. Small Purchase Procurement ($10,000 to $250,000)-(a) A minimum of two price or rate quotations shall be obtained from qualified sources; (b) The procurement will be made from the lowest priced qualified bid, if products or goods are equal; (c) MDOT requires for procurements under $25,000.00. Included Procurement Appendix A, B, E, F, G, H, or I and Vehicle Specification certification if applies. (d) MDOT requires for procurements over $25,000.00 solicitations, including specifications and written selection procedures (lowest bids), Include Procurement Appendix A, F, G, H or I and Vehicle Specification certification if applies. Third Party Contracts with applicable clauses and bond documents must be included. Cause: The Authority did not follow its own procurement policy. Effect: The Authority is noncompliant with 2 CFR 200 and its own procurement policy. Directive: We direct the Authority review and update its procurement policy and implement procedures to ensure that the Authority is complying with the federal requirements, required forms are being completed, and documentation is being maintained. Management’s Response--Corrective Action Plan: Contact person is Rufus Adams, Executive Director, 275 East Wall Street, P.O. Box 837, Benton Harbor, Michigan 49023. Telephone (269) 927-2268. The Authority will review and update its procurement policy to comply with federal requirements. The Authority’s management, consultant, and finance director will review the procedures in the policy to ensure they are being acted upon accordingly going forward.

Reference Number: 2023-001 Description: Procurement Program: 93.354 – Public Health Emergency Response Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.318 requires organizations expending federal funds to follow a written procurement policy that is in accordance with federal statutes. Condition: The Organization’s written procurement policy requires that the Organization obtain an adequate number of price quotes for purchases between $3,500 to $150,000. The Organization did not properly obtain any price quotes on an architecture firm doing work on their clinic building. Cause: Organization chose a firm they have previously worked with. Effect: The Organization was not in compliance with the requirements of Uniform Guidance related to procurement. Auditors’ Recommendation: Ensure the Organization follows their written procurement policy when expending federal funds. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: See Organization’s corrective action plan.

Finding Reference: 2023-001 – I. Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Information on the Federal Program: Grantor: Department of the Treasury Program Name: COVID-19 – Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Criteria or Specific Requirement: For compliance requirement I.1 Procurement, Nuvance Health and Subsidiaries (the “System”) must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.327. The System may also use its own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. Condition: As part of our testing over the operating effectiveness of internal controls over the Procurement compliance requirement, we noted that the System did not have a procurement policy that conforms to all applicable federal laws, State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Regulations, and the standards contained in the Uniform Guidance, as applicable, when purchasing services with the federal funds related to the program. Cause: The System did not comply and maintain a procurement policy that conforms to the provisions required by the Uniform Guidance upon receiving federal funds related to the program. Effect or Potential Effect: Purchasing of goods and/or services with program funds may not be in compliance with the Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs: Not applicable. Context: The System’s internal procurement policy has not been reviewed to incorporate all of the required provisions within 2 CFR 200.318 through 200.327. Identification as a repeat finding: This finding is not a repeat finding from the prior year. Recommendation: The System should update its procurement policy to include the provisions required by the Uniform Guidance for purchasing goods and/or services with federal funds. View of responsible officials: Management concurs with this finding and is currently drafting a procurement policy to incorporate the provisions required by the Uniform Guidance for purchasing goods and/or services with federal funds.

Finding Reference: 2023-001 – I. Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Information on the Federal Program: Grantor: Department of the Treasury Program Name: COVID-19 – Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Criteria or Specific Requirement: For compliance requirement I.1 Procurement, Nuvance Health and Subsidiaries (the “System”) must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.327. The System may also use its own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. Condition: As part of our testing over the operating effectiveness of internal controls over the Procurement compliance requirement, we noted that the System did not have a procurement policy that conforms to all applicable federal laws, State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Regulations, and the standards contained in the Uniform Guidance, as applicable, when purchasing services with the federal funds related to the program. Cause: The System did not comply and maintain a procurement policy that conforms to the provisions required by the Uniform Guidance upon receiving federal funds related to the program. Effect or Potential Effect: Purchasing of goods and/or services with program funds may not be in compliance with the Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs: Not applicable. Context: The System’s internal procurement policy has not been reviewed to incorporate all of the required provisions within 2 CFR 200.318 through 200.327. Identification as a repeat finding: This finding is not a repeat finding from the prior year. Recommendation: The System should update its procurement policy to include the provisions required by the Uniform Guidance for purchasing goods and/or services with federal funds. View of responsible officials: Management concurs with this finding and is currently drafting a procurement policy to incorporate the provisions required by the Uniform Guidance for purchasing goods and/or services with federal funds.

2023-003 – COVID 19: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Federal Awarding Agency – U.S. Department of the Treasury Assistance Listing Number – 21.027 FAIN – n/a Award Year – 2021 Questioned costs – none Criteria: 2 CFR Part 200 in general and 2 CFR sections 200.303(a) require non-Federal entities to establish and maintain effective internal controls over Federal awards, including the requirements for allowable costs, cost principles, and earmarking. The related compliance requirements are set in 2 CFR Part 200 sections 200.514(c), 200.212, 200.318(h), 200.332, 180.300 and subpart E; 48 CFR section 52.209-6; 31 CFR section 19.300; sections 602 and 603 of the Social Security Act as added by section 9901 of the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021, Pub. L. No. 117-2 as codified at 42 USC 802 and 803 and 31 CFR Part 35, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition: Controls related to calculation and reporting of lost revenue were not effective and the amount calculated as base year revenue was incorrectly reported. Cause: Base year calculation of revenue was performed using interim financial information and was not reconciled to final audited reports. Base year calculation of revenue was not clearly documented. Subsequent year revenue calculations were performed by a consultant who was not engaged to review the base year calculation. Controls over such calculations were not effective. Effect: Calculation of lost revenue was incorrectly reported. Expenditures related to the provision of government services related to such lost revenue did not exceed the actual lost revenue. Recommendation: We recommend that the City ensure that all controls for grants be documented in written procedures which should include the name or title of the positions responsible for each control (preparation, review, reconciliation, etc.) and that the performance of the controls be documented in a clear, reperformable manner including the name and date of each responsible individual and which specific control they performed over compliance for the grant.

2023-003 – COVID 19: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Federal Awarding Agency – U.S. Department of the Treasury Assistance Listing Number – 21.027 FAIN – n/a Award Year – 2021 Questioned costs – none Criteria: 2 CFR Part 200 in general and 2 CFR sections 200.303(a) require non-Federal entities to establish and maintain effective internal controls over Federal awards, including the requirements for allowable costs, cost principles, and earmarking. The related compliance requirements are set in 2 CFR Part 200 sections 200.514(c), 200.212, 200.318(h), 200.332, 180.300 and subpart E; 48 CFR section 52.209-6; 31 CFR section 19.300; sections 602 and 603 of the Social Security Act as added by section 9901 of the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021, Pub. L. No. 117-2 as codified at 42 USC 802 and 803 and 31 CFR Part 35, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition: Controls related to calculation and reporting of lost revenue were not effective and the amount calculated as base year revenue was incorrectly reported. Cause: Base year calculation of revenue was performed using interim financial information and was not reconciled to final audited reports. Base year calculation of revenue was not clearly documented. Subsequent year revenue calculations were performed by a consultant who was not engaged to review the base year calculation. Controls over such calculations were not effective. Effect: Calculation of lost revenue was incorrectly reported. Expenditures related to the provision of government services related to such lost revenue did not exceed the actual lost revenue. Recommendation: We recommend that the City ensure that all controls for grants be documented in written procedures which should include the name or title of the positions responsible for each control (preparation, review, reconciliation, etc.) and that the performance of the controls be documented in a clear, reperformable manner including the name and date of each responsible individual and which specific control they performed over compliance for the grant.

Criteria The non-federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of §§ 200.317, §§ 200.318, and §§ 200.319 when procuring the acquisition of property or services under a Federal award or subaward. Condition The County approved a contract to be paid for with federal awards without following 2CFR200.320(b), formal procurement methods, as the contract exceed the use of 2CFR200.320(a), informal procurement methods. Cause The County was not aware of the formal procurement method requirement for Federal awards. Effect The County was out of complaince with 2CFR200.320, Methods of Procurement to be Followed. Questioned Costs $431,191 Perspective Information The County has a written Federal procurement policy in accordance with 2CFR200.317 through 200.327. The County received COVID related Federal award funds and due to the inexperience and lack of guidance on the use and compliance requirements of the award, did not procure a project in accordance with the 2CFR200.320. Identification of Repeat Findings This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation We recommend the County receive additional training related to procurement activities and expand the County's internal controls related to Federal awards. Views of Responsible Officials We agree with the audit findings and are taking corrective action to train Grant Administrators, elected officials and employees on the procurement standards related to Federal awards.

Criteria: According to 2 CFR section 200.318(c) and 48 CFR sections 52.203-13 and 52.303-16, an entity should have written standards of conduct to cover conflicts of interest and govern the performance of its employees engaged in the selection, award, and administration of contracts. According to 2 CFR section 200.214, an entity is subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations. Condition: During our testing of federal award expenditures, it was noted that there were no formal written policies in place for standards of conducts covering conflict of interests for employees engaged in the selection, award, and administration of contracts nor to determine if a vendor is suspended or disbarred. Recommendation: The City should create policies and procedures for applicable requirements in order to comply with Federal regulations including procedures that cover conflicts of interest and govern the performance of its employees engaged in the selection, award, and administration of contracts and for procedures to determine whether vendors have been suspended or debarred prior to entering into contracts or purchase orders for all transactions and maintain documentation supporting this verification View of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: 1. Develop Comprehensive Policies and Procedures:  Policy Development: Create policies that align with federal, state, and municipal regulations governing conflicts of interest and employee conduct in contract selection, award, and administration.  Conflicts of Interest Policy: Define clear guidelines and procedures for identifying, disclosing, managing, and mitigating conflicts of interest among employees involved in contracting activities.  Contract Administration Procedures: Establish detailed procedures that encompass the entire contract lifecycle, ensuring compliance with federal, state, and municipal requirements at every stage.  Training and Awareness: Conduct training sessions for employees involved in contracting to ensure understanding and adherence to the newly developed policies, procedures and current bid law regulations set forth by the State of Alabama. 2. Implement Procedures for Vendor Evaluation and Debarment Checks:  Vendor Evaluation Process: Develop standardized procedures for evaluating vendors before entering into contracts, including criteria for assessing qualifications, capabilities, and compliance with regulatory requirements.  Debarment Check Procedure: Establish a systematic procedure to verify whether potential vendors have been suspended or debarred by federal, state, or municipal authorities prior to initiating contract negotiations.  Documentation Requirements: Specify the documentation that must be collected and maintained to demonstrate compliance with vendor evaluation and debarment check procedures. 3. Maintain Comprehensive Documentation:  Document Retention Policy: Create a policy outlining requirements for retaining all documentation related to contracts, including vendor evaluations, debarment checks, contract awards, modifications, and performance records.  Centralized Documentation Management: Implement a centralized system or repository for storing and managing contract-related documentation, ensuring accessibility, security, and compliance with retention policies.  Audit Trail: Maintain a clear audit trail for all contract-related activities, documenting decisionmaking processes and actions taken to ensure accountability and compliance. 4. Monitoring and Compliance Oversight:  Monitoring Mechanisms: Establish mechanisms for ongoing monitoring of compliance with federal, state, and municipal regulations, as well as internal policies related to conflicts of interest, contract administration, and vendor debarment checks.  Regular Audits: Conduct regular audits of contract management practices and documentation to identify any deviations from established procedures and regulatory requirements.  Reporting and Accountability: Implement a reporting structure that provides regular updates to management and stakeholders on compliance status, audit findings, and corrective actions taken to address deficiencies. 5. Continuous Improvement and Adaptation:  Feedback and Review: Encourage feedback from employees involved in contract management to identify opportunities for improving policies, procedures, and compliance practices.  Benchmarking: Benchmark contract management practices against industry standards, best practices, and regulatory changes to continuously enhance processes and ensure alignment with evolving requirements.  Adaptation to Changes: Stay informed about updates and changes in federal, state, and municipal regulations impacting conflicts of interest, contract administration, and vendor management, and update policies and procedures accordingly.

Finding 2023-004 – Procurement Policy Criteria: In accordance with Uniform Guidance 2 CFR, Part §200.318 "General Procurement Standards", the non-federal entity must have and use documented procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a federal award or subaward. The non-federal entity's document procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in 2 CFR, Part §200.317 - §200.327. Condition: During our review of the Coalition's Policies and Procedures, we determined that the Coalition's Procurement policy does not comply with 2 CFR, Part §200.317 - §200.327. Questioned Costs: None Cause: The Coalition was unaware of the changes in General Procurement Standards within Uniform Guidance and therefore does not have sufficiently established control policies and procedures to comply with 2 CFR, Part §200.317 - §200.327. Effect: The Coalition does not have the ability to determine if disbursements, projects, and bids comply with 2 CFR, Part §200.317 - §200.327. Recommendation: We recommend the Coalition becomes familiar with requirements of 2 CFR, Part §200.317 - §200.327. and establishes appropriate internal control policies and procedures related to procurement and that all staff be trained in those policies and procedures, so they are familiar with the requirements. We further recommend no contract or agreement be awarded by the Coalition in which appropriate procurement policies have not been followed. Views of Responsible Officials: See the corrective action plan that accompanies the schedule of findings and questioned costs.

Finding 2023-004 – Procurement Policy Criteria: In accordance with Uniform Guidance 2 CFR, Part §200.318 "General Procurement Standards", the non-federal entity must have and use documented procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a federal award or subaward. The non-federal entity's document procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in 2 CFR, Part §200.317 - §200.327. Condition: During our review of the Coalition's Policies and Procedures, we determined that the Coalition's Procurement policy does not comply with 2 CFR, Part §200.317 - §200.327. Questioned Costs: None Cause: The Coalition was unaware of the changes in General Procurement Standards within Uniform Guidance and therefore does not have sufficiently established control policies and procedures to comply with 2 CFR, Part §200.317 - §200.327. Effect: The Coalition does not have the ability to determine if disbursements, projects, and bids comply with 2 CFR, Part §200.317 - §200.327. Recommendation: We recommend the Coalition becomes familiar with requirements of 2 CFR, Part §200.317 - §200.327. and establishes appropriate internal control policies and procedures related to procurement and that all staff be trained in those policies and procedures, so they are familiar with the requirements. We further recommend no contract or agreement be awarded by the Coalition in which appropriate procurement policies have not been followed. Views of Responsible Officials: See the corrective action plan that accompanies the schedule of findings and questioned costs.

2023-006 — Procurement Federal/state program information: Funding agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Title: Indian Self-Determination ALN: 93.441 Award period: 10/1/2022 – 9/30/2023 Criteria: Non-federal entities other than states must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. This includes oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. Further, according to the CBNHC Finance Policies and Procedures, the Board of Directors shall approve all purchases over $5,000. Condition: For one vendor paid over $5,000 during fiscal year 2023, there was no evidence that selection and use of this vendor was approved by the Board of Directors. For one additional contractor, CBNHC did not have an active contract in place with the contractor. Context: Two of 35 nonpayroll transactions tested. Questioned Costs: None. Cause: CBNHC is not implementing their Financial Policies and Procedures to ensure that the selection and use of all vendors and contractors are properly documented and approved according to purchase authority levels. Effect: CBNHC is not in compliance with procurement requirements for the Indian Self-Determination program. Auditor’s Recommendations: CBNHC should implement its Financial Policies and Procedures to ensure that the selection and use of all vendors and contractors are properly documented and approved. Management’s Response: In fiscal year 2023, CBNHC experienced significant disruption in its administrative operations caused by political struggles over its rightful governing body. During this period, two key leadership members were administratively unavailable to support the proper procurement of vendor contract renewals. The purchases were made outside the CBNHC procurement policies unbeknownst to CBNHC leadership.

2023-006 — Procurement Federal/state program information: Funding agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Title: Indian Self-Determination ALN: 93.441 Award period: 10/1/2022 – 9/30/2023 Criteria: Non-federal entities other than states must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. This includes oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. Further, according to the CBNHC Finance Policies and Procedures, the Board of Directors shall approve all purchases over $5,000. Condition: For one vendor paid over $5,000 during fiscal year 2023, there was no evidence that selection and use of this vendor was approved by the Board of Directors. For one additional contractor, CBNHC did not have an active contract in place with the contractor. Context: Two of 35 nonpayroll transactions tested. Questioned Costs: None. Cause: CBNHC is not implementing their Financial Policies and Procedures to ensure that the selection and use of all vendors and contractors are properly documented and approved according to purchase authority levels. Effect: CBNHC is not in compliance with procurement requirements for the Indian Self-Determination program. Auditor’s Recommendations: CBNHC should implement its Financial Policies and Procedures to ensure that the selection and use of all vendors and contractors are properly documented and approved. Management’s Response: In fiscal year 2023, CBNHC experienced significant disruption in its administrative operations caused by political struggles over its rightful governing body. During this period, two key leadership members were administratively unavailable to support the proper procurement of vendor contract renewals. The purchases were made outside the CBNHC procurement policies unbeknownst to CBNHC leadership.

Procurement Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name: Assistance Listing Number 93.696, Certified Community Behavioral Health Clinic Expansion Grant Federal Award Identification Number and Year: 1H79SM086491-01, Program Grant Period 09/29/2022-09/29/2023 Pass-through Entity: N/A Type: Material weakness in internal control and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding: No Criteria: Per 2 CFR 200.318(a), the non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. In addition, per 2 CFR 200.318(i), the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. Condition: The Board did not utilize federal procurement requirements cited above for the project evaluation and coordination services for the Certified Community Behavioral Health Clinics project. Identification of How Likely Questioned Costs Were Computed: The questioned costs were determined from project evaluation and coordination services billed (federal portion) during the October 1, 2022, through September 29, 2023, period as summarized from the request for disbursement of funds submitted to SAMHSA. Known Questioned Costs: $150,000 Context: We tested the procurement of the one material contract and identified the contract did not follow federal procurement requirements. Cause/Effect: Prior to the Board being awarded of the grant, a bid for grant writing services was procured with the additional question of the availability of project evaluation services being able to be provided. Since the grant writing was procured and the Board decided to contract with the same consulting firm that provided the grant writing, they did not believe they needed to bid the project evaluation and coordination services for this project. The Board did not utilize federal procurement requirements to ensure fair and open competition and reasonable cost for project evaluation and coordination services for the Certified Community Behavioral Health Clinic project. Recommendation: We recommend the Board follow federal procurement as required in 2 CFR 200.319(d) for all contracts reimbursed with federal funds. View of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action Plan: See attached corrective action plan.

Evaluating Potential Contractor for Debarment and Suspension Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name: Assistance Listing Number 93.696, Certified Community Behavioral Health Clinic Expansion Grant Federal Award Identification Number and Year: 1H79SM086491-01, Program Grant Period 09/29/2022-09/29/2023 Pass-through Entity: N/A Type: Material weakness in internal control and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding: No Criteria: A nonfederal entity must have adequate procedures in place to verify that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded (2 CFR sections 200.212 and 200.318(h); 2 CFR section 180.300; 48 CFR section 52.209-6). Condition: During procurement testing of the Certified Community Behavior Health Clinic Expansion Grant, we noted that the Board did not have documentation that sam.gov was reviewed to ensure the consultant utilized was not suspended or debarred. Identification of How Likely Questioned Costs Were Computed: N/A Known Questioned Costs: None. Subsequently, the sam.gov website was reviewed to ensure that the contractors were not suspended or debarred. Context: The consultant utilized for the Certified Community Behavior Health Clinic Expansion Grant project was not evaluated. Cause/Effect: The Board currently has a process for suspension and debarment for direct service providers only, and did not have controls in place to comply with suspension and debarment evaluation requirements for the Certified Community Behavioral Health Clinic Expansion Grant or other federal funds outside of direct service providers. Recommendation: We recommend the Board implement adequate controls to ensure verification of debarment, suspension, or exclusion takes place before entering into covered transactions. View of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action Plan: See attached corrective action plan.

2023-003: Procurement Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name: Assistance Listing Number 93.696, Certified Community Behavioral Health Clinic Expansion Grant Federal Award Identification Number and Year: 1H79SM086680-01, Program Grant Period 09/29/2022-09/29/2023 Pass-through Entity: N/A SANILAC COUNTY COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH AUTHORITY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2023 Type: Material weakness in internal control and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding: No Criteria: Per 2 CFR 200.318(a), the non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. In addition, per 2 CFR 200.318(i), the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. Condition: The Authority did not utilize federal procurement requirements cited above for the tele-health services and SUD Peer Recovery Service contracted service providers utilized for the Certified Community Behavioral Health Clinics project. Identification of How Likely Questioned Costs Were Computed: The questioned costs were determined from the tele-health services and SUD Peer Recovery Service contractor payments billed (federal portion) during the October 1, 2022, through September 29, 2023, period as summarized from the request for disbursement of funds submitted to SAMHSA. Known Questioned Costs: $33,440 Context: We tested the procurement of the three contracts related to tele-health services and SUD Peer Recovery Service contract service providers utilized and funded by the grant and identified that two of the three contracts did not follow federal procurement requirements. Cause/Effect: Prior to the Authority being awarded the grant, tele-health services were previously being provided under a current contract. The Authority was not able to document the basis for not providing a competitive procurement of tele-health services specific to this contract nor supporting a reason it should follow a noncompetitive procurement methodology. The contract for SUD Peer Recovery Services has been indicated by management to meet the criteria as a sole source procurement as allowed under 2 CFR 200.320(c); however, adequate documentation was not available to support this claim at the time the contract was awarded (subsequently a Google search was provided of only Lapeer and Sanilac Counties). The Authority did not utilize federal procurement requirements to ensure fair and open competition and reasonable cost for tele-health services and SUD Peer Recovery Services and coordination services for the Certified Community Behavioral Health Clinic project. Recommendation: We recommend the Authority follow federal procurement as required in 2 CFR 200.319(d) for all contracts reimbursed with federal funds. View of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action Plan: See attached corrective action plan.

2023-004: Evaluating Potential Contractor for Debarment and Suspension Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name: Assistance Listing Number 93.696, Certified Community Behavioral Health Clinic Expansion Grant Federal Award Identification Number and Year: 1H79SM086680-01, Program Grant Period 09/29/2022-09/29/2023 Pass-through Entity: N/A Type: Material weakness in internal control and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding: No Criteria: A nonfederal entity must have adequate procedures in place to verify that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded (2 CFR sections 200.212 and 200.318(h); 2 CRF section 180.300; 48 CFR section 52.209-6). Condition: During procurement testing of the Certified Community Behavior Health Clinic Expansion Grant, we noted that the Authority did not have documentation that sam.gov was reviewed to ensure the consultant utilized was not suspended or debarred for two of the three contracts expended. The Authority checked suspension and debarment on the individual clinicians, however, did not check it for the company. Identification of How Likely Questioned Costs Were Computed: N/A Known Questioned Costs: None. Subsequently, the sam.gov was reviewed to ensure that the contractors were not suspended or debarred. Context: The consultant utilized for the Certified Community Behavior Health Clinic Expansion Grant project were not evaluated prior to the award of the contract. Cause/Effect: The Authority did not have controls in place to ensure timely compliance with the suspension and debarment evaluation requirements prior to the awarding of contracts for the Certified Community Behavioral Health Clinic Expansion Grant or other federal funds. Recommendation: We recommend the Authority implement adequate controls to ensure verification of debarment, suspension, or exclusion takes place before entering covered transactions. View of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action Plan: See attached corrective action plan.

2023-005: Written Policies and Procedures Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name: Assistance Listing Number 93.696, Certified Community Behavioral Health Clinic Expansion Grant Federal Award Identification Number and Year: 1H79SM086680-01, Program Grant Period 09/29/2022-09/29/2023 Pass-through Entity: N/A Type: Material weakness in internal control and noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding: No Criteria: As a precondition to receive federal awards, prospective recipients must have effective internal controls over the federal award. As described in 2 CFR, Part 200.303, nonfederal entities must have certain written policies and procedures surrounding the management of their federal awards. Such policies should include procedures for collecting payments of federal funds per 2 CRF 200.305, cash management (i.e., minimizing the time between draws and actual disbursing of federal awards) per 2 CFR 200.302(b)(6), allowable cost per 2 CFR 200.403, and conflict of interest per 2 CFR 200.318. Per 2 CFR 200.319(d), the non-Federal entity must have written procedures for procurement transactions. Condition: The Authority did not have written procedures for cash management and allowable cost. Identification of How Likely Questioned Costs Were Computed: N/A Known Questioned Costs: None Context: N/A Cause/Effect: Although the Authority is aware that they were required to have written policies and procedures for the items noted above, they were using the grant agreement guidelines that provide grantees with guidance for ensuring the existing accounting and personnel policies and procedures include the necessary controls. These guidelines address the compliance areas required by the Uniform Guidance. Recommendation: We recommend the Authority adopt written policies and procedures over cash management and allowable costs required under the Uniform Guidance. View of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action Plan: See attached corrective action plan.

Finding Type: Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls and Noncompliance (Procurement, Suspension & Debarment) Federal Program: U.S. Department of Treasury – Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (AL #21.027) Criteria: The Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Section 200.318(a) requires non-Federal entities to establish and use documented procurement procedures that conform to the procurement standards identified in Sections 200.317 through 200.327. Condition: While the County does have a written procurement policy that meets the requirements, the policy was not being followed. The County did not maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement including the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, or the basis for the contract price. The County did not maintain documentation to sufficiently support a written price analysis on one procurement tested. The County was unable to provide proposals from non-winning bidders and/or a price analysis when only one bid was received on two contracts tested. The County does not have formal procedures or controls in place to ensure written documentation of a cost analysis or a contract file are maintained. Cause: The County does not have controls in place to ensure that its procurement policy is being followed and that contract files are complete. Effect: As a result of this condition, the County did not fully comply with the Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs: No costs have been questioned as a result of this finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the County implement controls to ensure the procurement policy is followed and complete contract files are maintained. Views of Responsible Officials: The County will work to implement controls to ensure the procurement policy is followed.

Finding 2023-009 - Procurement Information on Federal Programs: All programs Criteria or Specific Requirements: According to 2 CFR §200.303, the non-Federal entity must: establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, or the Internal Control Integrated Framework, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Additionally, according to 2 CFR §200.320, Procurement standards, the non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §200.318, and §200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award: a) Informal procurement methods, b) Formal procurement methods, c) Noncompetitive procurement. Condition: During the review of the procurement compliance requirement related to major program, it was determined that U.S. Water Alliance did not have a document procurement policy in place until August 2023. Cause: Management did not have internal control procedures in place to ensure that procurement requirements were adequately followed, documented and retained when Federal awards were obtained. Effect: Failure to have and use documented procurement procedures could have resulted in noncompliance with the Criteria section above. Perspective: U.S. Water Alliance established a documented procurement policy that was put in place in August 2023. Within a random sample of 26 disbursements, 3 disbursements would have required compliance with the simplified acquisition method, but would have also met the exception due to the existence of an emergency causing public harm and the specialized nature of the work performed. Questioned Costs: Questioned costs were not identified. Repeat Finding: Not applicable. Recommendation: U.S. Water Alliance should adhere to its procurement policy put in place in August 2023 to ensure compliance with the Uniform Guidance going forward. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: While the Alliance did not have a standalone procurement policy in place until August 2023, it did have purchasing policies embedded in its Accounting and Finance Manual that covered purchases relative to our work at that time. No further corrective action is needed however policies are reviewed annually to ensure compliance under 2 CFR 200.516(a).

Finding 2023-009 - Procurement Information on Federal Programs: All programs Criteria or Specific Requirements: According to 2 CFR §200.303, the non-Federal entity must: establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, or the Internal Control Integrated Framework, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Additionally, according to 2 CFR §200.320, Procurement standards, the non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §200.318, and §200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award: a) Informal procurement methods, b) Formal procurement methods, c) Noncompetitive procurement. Condition: During the review of the procurement compliance requirement related to major program, it was determined that U.S. Water Alliance did not have a document procurement policy in place until August 2023. Cause: Management did not have internal control procedures in place to ensure that procurement requirements were adequately followed, documented and retained when Federal awards were obtained. Effect: Failure to have and use documented procurement procedures could have resulted in noncompliance with the Criteria section above. Perspective: U.S. Water Alliance established a documented procurement policy that was put in place in August 2023. Within a random sample of 26 disbursements, 3 disbursements would have required compliance with the simplified acquisition method, but would have also met the exception due to the existence of an emergency causing public harm and the specialized nature of the work performed. Questioned Costs: Questioned costs were not identified. Repeat Finding: Not applicable. Recommendation: U.S. Water Alliance should adhere to its procurement policy put in place in August 2023 to ensure compliance with the Uniform Guidance going forward. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: While the Alliance did not have a standalone procurement policy in place until August 2023, it did have purchasing policies embedded in its Accounting and Finance Manual that covered purchases relative to our work at that time. No further corrective action is needed however policies are reviewed annually to ensure compliance under 2 CFR 200.516(a).

Finding 2023-009 - Procurement Information on Federal Programs: All programs Criteria or Specific Requirements: According to 2 CFR §200.303, the non-Federal entity must: establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, or the Internal Control Integrated Framework, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Additionally, according to 2 CFR §200.320, Procurement standards, the non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §200.318, and §200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award: a) Informal procurement methods, b) Formal procurement methods, c) Noncompetitive procurement. Condition: During the review of the procurement compliance requirement related to major program, it was determined that U.S. Water Alliance did not have a document procurement policy in place until August 2023. Cause: Management did not have internal control procedures in place to ensure that procurement requirements were adequately followed, documented and retained when Federal awards were obtained. Effect: Failure to have and use documented procurement procedures could have resulted in noncompliance with the Criteria section above. Perspective: U.S. Water Alliance established a documented procurement policy that was put in place in August 2023. Within a random sample of 26 disbursements, 3 disbursements would have required compliance with the simplified acquisition method, but would have also met the exception due to the existence of an emergency causing public harm and the specialized nature of the work performed. Questioned Costs: Questioned costs were not identified. Repeat Finding: Not applicable. Recommendation: U.S. Water Alliance should adhere to its procurement policy put in place in August 2023 to ensure compliance with the Uniform Guidance going forward. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: While the Alliance did not have a standalone procurement policy in place until August 2023, it did have purchasing policies embedded in its Accounting and Finance Manual that covered purchases relative to our work at that time. No further corrective action is needed however policies are reviewed annually to ensure compliance under 2 CFR 200.516(a).

Finding 2023-009 - Procurement Information on Federal Programs: All programs Criteria or Specific Requirements: According to 2 CFR §200.303, the non-Federal entity must: establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, or the Internal Control Integrated Framework, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Additionally, according to 2 CFR §200.320, Procurement standards, the non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §200.318, and §200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award: a) Informal procurement methods, b) Formal procurement methods, c) Noncompetitive procurement. Condition: During the review of the procurement compliance requirement related to major program, it was determined that U.S. Water Alliance did not have a document procurement policy in place until August 2023. Cause: Management did not have internal control procedures in place to ensure that procurement requirements were adequately followed, documented and retained when Federal awards were obtained. Effect: Failure to have and use documented procurement procedures could have resulted in noncompliance with the Criteria section above. Perspective: U.S. Water Alliance established a documented procurement policy that was put in place in August 2023. Within a random sample of 26 disbursements, 3 disbursements would have required compliance with the simplified acquisition method, but would have also met the exception due to the existence of an emergency causing public harm and the specialized nature of the work performed. Questioned Costs: Questioned costs were not identified. Repeat Finding: Not applicable. Recommendation: U.S. Water Alliance should adhere to its procurement policy put in place in August 2023 to ensure compliance with the Uniform Guidance going forward. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: While the Alliance did not have a standalone procurement policy in place until August 2023, it did have purchasing policies embedded in its Accounting and Finance Manual that covered purchases relative to our work at that time. No further corrective action is needed however policies are reviewed annually to ensure compliance under 2 CFR 200.516(a).

Findings and Questioned Costs Related to Federal and State Awards (continued) Finding Number: 2023‐002 Repeat Finding: Yes; 2022‐002, 2021‐002 Federal Program Name/Assistance Listing Title: Federal Transit Cluster Federal Assistance Listing Number: 20.507, 20.526 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Award Number: 5339‐R‐2022‐GCTD‐00039, 5339‐R‐2022‐GCTD‐00039 Federal Pass‐Through Agency: Texas Department of Transportation State Program Name: State Urbanized Area Formula Program, State Formula Grants For Rural Areas State Agency: Texas Department of Transportation Type of Finding: Noncompliance Material to Financial Statements and Federal/State Major Programs, Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance Compliance Requirement: Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Questioned Costs: N/A; In accordance with 2 CFR 200.516(b)(7), when there are known questioned costs but the dollar amount is undetermined or not reported, the audit findings must include a description of why the dollar amount was undetermined or otherwise could not be reported. Based on our description of the finding below, the District was unable to provide evidence that the federal guidelines were followed for purchases exceeding the small purchases threshold. Due to inadequate records being maintained by the District, we were unable to determine if proper procured occurred for each purchase, and could not be located, or proper procurement never occurred. Therefore, we were unable to differentiate transactions as questioned costs from transactions in question caused solely because of deficiencies in internal control. Criteria: Non‐federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR §§200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable State and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200. Additionally, non‐federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. When a non‐federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the non‐federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR §180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. This verification may be accomplished by (1) checking the System of Award Management (SAM) maintained by the General Services Administration (GSA) or (2) collecting a certification from the entity, or (3) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that entity (2 CFR §180.300). Condition: The District did not meet the requirement to verify that covered transactions were only made to an entity that was not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded. Additionally, the District did was unable to provide evidence that the federal guidelines for purchases exceeding the small purchases threshold. Cause: The District’s internal controls over procurement of goods and services were not adequate. Effect: The District was not in compliance with Federal regulations and guidelines related to suspension and debarment or procurement. Context: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. During our review of purchasing, we noted the following: • For 7 out of 7 procurements reviewed, documentation demonstrating a vendor check for suspension and debarment was not retained. • For 3 out of 5 vendors reviewed with total expenditures below the Simplified Acquisition threshold, no documentation of quotes was maintained. • For 2 out of 2 vendors reviewed with total expenditures that exceeded the Simplified Acquisition threshold, no documentation of a sealed procurement issued in accordance with federal guidelines was maintained. Recommendation: The District should maintain documentation of procurement actions in the vendor file including sealed procurements issued, quotes and suspension and debarment checks. Review of procurement compliance should occur before the District’s funds are obligated. Views of Responsible Officials: The District agrees with the finding and has taken steps to address this issue as detailed in the Corrective Action Plan.

Findings and Questioned Costs Related to Federal and State Awards (continued) Finding Number: 2023‐002 Repeat Finding: Yes; 2022‐002, 2021‐002 Federal Program Name/Assistance Listing Title: Federal Transit Cluster Federal Assistance Listing Number: 20.507, 20.526 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Award Number: 5339‐R‐2022‐GCTD‐00039, 5339‐R‐2022‐GCTD‐00039 Federal Pass‐Through Agency: Texas Department of Transportation State Program Name: State Urbanized Area Formula Program, State Formula Grants For Rural Areas State Agency: Texas Department of Transportation Type of Finding: Noncompliance Material to Financial Statements and Federal/State Major Programs, Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance Compliance Requirement: Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Questioned Costs: N/A; In accordance with 2 CFR 200.516(b)(7), when there are known questioned costs but the dollar amount is undetermined or not reported, the audit findings must include a description of why the dollar amount was undetermined or otherwise could not be reported. Based on our description of the finding below, the District was unable to provide evidence that the federal guidelines were followed for purchases exceeding the small purchases threshold. Due to inadequate records being maintained by the District, we were unable to determine if proper procured occurred for each purchase, and could not be located, or proper procurement never occurred. Therefore, we were unable to differentiate transactions as questioned costs from transactions in question caused solely because of deficiencies in internal control. Criteria: Non‐federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR §§200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable State and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200. Additionally, non‐federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. When a non‐federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the non‐federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR §180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. This verification may be accomplished by (1) checking the System of Award Management (SAM) maintained by the General Services Administration (GSA) or (2) collecting a certification from the entity, or (3) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that entity (2 CFR §180.300). Condition: The District did not meet the requirement to verify that covered transactions were only made to an entity that was not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded. Additionally, the District did was unable to provide evidence that the federal guidelines for purchases exceeding the small purchases threshold. Cause: The District’s internal controls over procurement of goods and services were not adequate. Effect: The District was not in compliance with Federal regulations and guidelines related to suspension and debarment or procurement. Context: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. During our review of purchasing, we noted the following: • For 7 out of 7 procurements reviewed, documentation demonstrating a vendor check for suspension and debarment was not retained. • For 3 out of 5 vendors reviewed with total expenditures below the Simplified Acquisition threshold, no documentation of quotes was maintained. • For 2 out of 2 vendors reviewed with total expenditures that exceeded the Simplified Acquisition threshold, no documentation of a sealed procurement issued in accordance with federal guidelines was maintained. Recommendation: The District should maintain documentation of procurement actions in the vendor file including sealed procurements issued, quotes and suspension and debarment checks. Review of procurement compliance should occur before the District’s funds are obligated. Views of Responsible Officials: The District agrees with the finding and has taken steps to address this issue as detailed in the Corrective Action Plan.

Findings and Questioned Costs Related to Federal and State Awards (continued) Finding Number: 2023‐002 Repeat Finding: Yes; 2022‐002, 2021‐002 Federal Program Name/Assistance Listing Title: Federal Transit Cluster Federal Assistance Listing Number: 20.507, 20.526 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Award Number: 5339‐R‐2022‐GCTD‐00039, 5339‐R‐2022‐GCTD‐00039 Federal Pass‐Through Agency: Texas Department of Transportation State Program Name: State Urbanized Area Formula Program, State Formula Grants For Rural Areas State Agency: Texas Department of Transportation Type of Finding: Noncompliance Material to Financial Statements and Federal/State Major Programs, Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance Compliance Requirement: Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Questioned Costs: N/A; In accordance with 2 CFR 200.516(b)(7), when there are known questioned costs but the dollar amount is undetermined or not reported, the audit findings must include a description of why the dollar amount was undetermined or otherwise could not be reported. Based on our description of the finding below, the District was unable to provide evidence that the federal guidelines were followed for purchases exceeding the small purchases threshold. Due to inadequate records being maintained by the District, we were unable to determine if proper procured occurred for each purchase, and could not be located, or proper procurement never occurred. Therefore, we were unable to differentiate transactions as questioned costs from transactions in question caused solely because of deficiencies in internal control. Criteria: Non‐federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR §§200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable State and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200. Additionally, non‐federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. When a non‐federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the non‐federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR §180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. This verification may be accomplished by (1) checking the System of Award Management (SAM) maintained by the General Services Administration (GSA) or (2) collecting a certification from the entity, or (3) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that entity (2 CFR §180.300). Condition: The District did not meet the requirement to verify that covered transactions were only made to an entity that was not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded. Additionally, the District did was unable to provide evidence that the federal guidelines for purchases exceeding the small purchases threshold. Cause: The District’s internal controls over procurement of goods and services were not adequate. Effect: The District was not in compliance with Federal regulations and guidelines related to suspension and debarment or procurement. Context: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. During our review of purchasing, we noted the following: • For 7 out of 7 procurements reviewed, documentation demonstrating a vendor check for suspension and debarment was not retained. • For 3 out of 5 vendors reviewed with total expenditures below the Simplified Acquisition threshold, no documentation of quotes was maintained. • For 2 out of 2 vendors reviewed with total expenditures that exceeded the Simplified Acquisition threshold, no documentation of a sealed procurement issued in accordance with federal guidelines was maintained. Recommendation: The District should maintain documentation of procurement actions in the vendor file including sealed procurements issued, quotes and suspension and debarment checks. Review of procurement compliance should occur before the District’s funds are obligated. Views of Responsible Officials: The District agrees with the finding and has taken steps to address this issue as detailed in the Corrective Action Plan.

Findings and Questioned Costs Related to Federal and State Awards (continued) Finding Number: 2023‐002 Repeat Finding: Yes; 2022‐002, 2021‐002 Federal Program Name/Assistance Listing Title: Federal Transit Cluster Federal Assistance Listing Number: 20.507, 20.526 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Award Number: 5339‐R‐2022‐GCTD‐00039, 5339‐R‐2022‐GCTD‐00039 Federal Pass‐Through Agency: Texas Department of Transportation State Program Name: State Urbanized Area Formula Program, State Formula Grants For Rural Areas State Agency: Texas Department of Transportation Type of Finding: Noncompliance Material to Financial Statements and Federal/State Major Programs, Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance Compliance Requirement: Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Questioned Costs: N/A; In accordance with 2 CFR 200.516(b)(7), when there are known questioned costs but the dollar amount is undetermined or not reported, the audit findings must include a description of why the dollar amount was undetermined or otherwise could not be reported. Based on our description of the finding below, the District was unable to provide evidence that the federal guidelines were followed for purchases exceeding the small purchases threshold. Due to inadequate records being maintained by the District, we were unable to determine if proper procured occurred for each purchase, and could not be located, or proper procurement never occurred. Therefore, we were unable to differentiate transactions as questioned costs from transactions in question caused solely because of deficiencies in internal control. Criteria: Non‐federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR §§200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable State and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200. Additionally, non‐federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. When a non‐federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the non‐federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR §180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. This verification may be accomplished by (1) checking the System of Award Management (SAM) maintained by the General Services Administration (GSA) or (2) collecting a certification from the entity, or (3) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that entity (2 CFR §180.300). Condition: The District did not meet the requirement to verify that covered transactions were only made to an entity that was not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded. Additionally, the District did was unable to provide evidence that the federal guidelines for purchases exceeding the small purchases threshold. Cause: The District’s internal controls over procurement of goods and services were not adequate. Effect: The District was not in compliance with Federal regulations and guidelines related to suspension and debarment or procurement. Context: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. During our review of purchasing, we noted the following: • For 7 out of 7 procurements reviewed, documentation demonstrating a vendor check for suspension and debarment was not retained. • For 3 out of 5 vendors reviewed with total expenditures below the Simplified Acquisition threshold, no documentation of quotes was maintained. • For 2 out of 2 vendors reviewed with total expenditures that exceeded the Simplified Acquisition threshold, no documentation of a sealed procurement issued in accordance with federal guidelines was maintained. Recommendation: The District should maintain documentation of procurement actions in the vendor file including sealed procurements issued, quotes and suspension and debarment checks. Review of procurement compliance should occur before the District’s funds are obligated. Views of Responsible Officials: The District agrees with the finding and has taken steps to address this issue as detailed in the Corrective Action Plan.

Findings and Questioned Costs Related to Federal and State Awards (continued) Finding Number: 2023‐002 Repeat Finding: Yes; 2022‐002, 2021‐002 Federal Program Name/Assistance Listing Title: Federal Transit Cluster Federal Assistance Listing Number: 20.507, 20.526 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Award Number: 5339‐R‐2022‐GCTD‐00039, 5339‐R‐2022‐GCTD‐00039 Federal Pass‐Through Agency: Texas Department of Transportation State Program Name: State Urbanized Area Formula Program, State Formula Grants For Rural Areas State Agency: Texas Department of Transportation Type of Finding: Noncompliance Material to Financial Statements and Federal/State Major Programs, Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance Compliance Requirement: Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Questioned Costs: N/A; In accordance with 2 CFR 200.516(b)(7), when there are known questioned costs but the dollar amount is undetermined or not reported, the audit findings must include a description of why the dollar amount was undetermined or otherwise could not be reported. Based on our description of the finding below, the District was unable to provide evidence that the federal guidelines were followed for purchases exceeding the small purchases threshold. Due to inadequate records being maintained by the District, we were unable to determine if proper procured occurred for each purchase, and could not be located, or proper procurement never occurred. Therefore, we were unable to differentiate transactions as questioned costs from transactions in question caused solely because of deficiencies in internal control. Criteria: Non‐federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR §§200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable State and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200. Additionally, non‐federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. When a non‐federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the non‐federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR §180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. This verification may be accomplished by (1) checking the System of Award Management (SAM) maintained by the General Services Administration (GSA) or (2) collecting a certification from the entity, or (3) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that entity (2 CFR §180.300). Condition: The District did not meet the requirement to verify that covered transactions were only made to an entity that was not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded. Additionally, the District did was unable to provide evidence that the federal guidelines for purchases exceeding the small purchases threshold. Cause: The District’s internal controls over procurement of goods and services were not adequate. Effect: The District was not in compliance with Federal regulations and guidelines related to suspension and debarment or procurement. Context: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. During our review of purchasing, we noted the following: • For 7 out of 7 procurements reviewed, documentation demonstrating a vendor check for suspension and debarment was not retained. • For 3 out of 5 vendors reviewed with total expenditures below the Simplified Acquisition threshold, no documentation of quotes was maintained. • For 2 out of 2 vendors reviewed with total expenditures that exceeded the Simplified Acquisition threshold, no documentation of a sealed procurement issued in accordance with federal guidelines was maintained. Recommendation: The District should maintain documentation of procurement actions in the vendor file including sealed procurements issued, quotes and suspension and debarment checks. Review of procurement compliance should occur before the District’s funds are obligated. Views of Responsible Officials: The District agrees with the finding and has taken steps to address this issue as detailed in the Corrective Action Plan.

Findings and Questioned Costs Related to Federal and State Awards (continued) Finding Number: 2023‐002 Repeat Finding: Yes; 2022‐002, 2021‐002 Federal Program Name/Assistance Listing Title: Federal Transit Cluster Federal Assistance Listing Number: 20.507, 20.526 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Award Number: 5339‐R‐2022‐GCTD‐00039, 5339‐R‐2022‐GCTD‐00039 Federal Pass‐Through Agency: Texas Department of Transportation State Program Name: State Urbanized Area Formula Program, State Formula Grants For Rural Areas State Agency: Texas Department of Transportation Type of Finding: Noncompliance Material to Financial Statements and Federal/State Major Programs, Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance Compliance Requirement: Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Questioned Costs: N/A; In accordance with 2 CFR 200.516(b)(7), when there are known questioned costs but the dollar amount is undetermined or not reported, the audit findings must include a description of why the dollar amount was undetermined or otherwise could not be reported. Based on our description of the finding below, the District was unable to provide evidence that the federal guidelines were followed for purchases exceeding the small purchases threshold. Due to inadequate records being maintained by the District, we were unable to determine if proper procured occurred for each purchase, and could not be located, or proper procurement never occurred. Therefore, we were unable to differentiate transactions as questioned costs from transactions in question caused solely because of deficiencies in internal control. Criteria: Non‐federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR §§200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable State and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200. Additionally, non‐federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. When a non‐federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the non‐federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR §180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. This verification may be accomplished by (1) checking the System of Award Management (SAM) maintained by the General Services Administration (GSA) or (2) collecting a certification from the entity, or (3) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that entity (2 CFR §180.300). Condition: The District did not meet the requirement to verify that covered transactions were only made to an entity that was not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded. Additionally, the District did was unable to provide evidence that the federal guidelines for purchases exceeding the small purchases threshold. Cause: The District’s internal controls over procurement of goods and services were not adequate. Effect: The District was not in compliance with Federal regulations and guidelines related to suspension and debarment or procurement. Context: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. During our review of purchasing, we noted the following: • For 7 out of 7 procurements reviewed, documentation demonstrating a vendor check for suspension and debarment was not retained. • For 3 out of 5 vendors reviewed with total expenditures below the Simplified Acquisition threshold, no documentation of quotes was maintained. • For 2 out of 2 vendors reviewed with total expenditures that exceeded the Simplified Acquisition threshold, no documentation of a sealed procurement issued in accordance with federal guidelines was maintained. Recommendation: The District should maintain documentation of procurement actions in the vendor file including sealed procurements issued, quotes and suspension and debarment checks. Review of procurement compliance should occur before the District’s funds are obligated. Views of Responsible Officials: The District agrees with the finding and has taken steps to address this issue as detailed in the Corrective Action Plan.

Finding Number: 2023-002 – Contractor Monitoring Federal Agencies: United States Department of State Federal Programs: All programs under Assistance Listing Number 19.345 Assistance Listing Numbers: 19.345 Award Identification Number and Year: All awards under Assistance Listing Number 19.345 Criteria or Specific Requirement: Per 2 CFR §200.318(b), non-Federal entities must maintain oversight to ensure that contractors perform in accordance with the terms, conditions, and specifications of their contracts. Effective monitoring includes evaluating the quality and timeliness of services and ensuring that contractors meet performance expectations and compliance requirements. Condition: CIPE did not have adequate internal controls in place to monitor the quality and efficiency of services provided by third-party contractors funded by Federal programs. Specifically, the absence of performance metrics, lack of regular reviews, or failure to verify compliance with contract terms. Cause: The lack of controls resulted from insufficient resources dedicated to contract management, lack of a formalized monitoring framework, and turnover in staff responsible for oversight. Effect or Potential Effect: Failure to monitor third-party performance increases the risk of substandard services, inefficiencies, and noncompliance with Federal program requirements. This could potentially lead to questioned costs and jeopardize program outcomes. Questioned Costs: None Context: This finding is considered systemic rather than isolated. The entity has not had prior findings related to contractor monitoring in recent years. Identification as a Repeat Finding, if Applicable: Not applicable Recommendation: We recommend that CIPE: 1. Develop and implement a formalized monitoring framework to oversee third-party contractors, including the establishment of performance metrics and periodic evaluations. 2. Assign responsibility for monitoring to specific staff members and provide training to ensure consistent oversight practices. 3. Require regular reporting from contractors on progress and performance, and conduct periodic site visits or audits as appropriate.

Criteria: A non-federal entity is required to have certain written policies and procedure in compliance with Uniform Guidance and must comply with the procurement standards as described in 2 CFR 200.318 through 2 CFR 200.327. Condition: AIRS does not appear to have created written purchasing or procurement policies and procedures as required by 2 CFR 200.318(a). Since AIRS is an affiliate organization of the Ethiopian Community Development Council (ECDC), it appears that the relationship between AIRS and ECDC meets the “affiliate” requirement under 2 CFR 200.318 (c) (2). It does appear that AIRS has created written standards of conduct covering organizational conflicts of interest. Cause: Management has not created or maintained certain written policies and procedures as required under 2 CFR 200.318. Effect: AIRS is not in compliance with certain written policies and procedures as required under 2 CFR 200.318. Questioned Costs: None reported. Repeat Finding from Prior Year: Yes. Recommendation: In response to Finding 2021-006 during the audit for the year ended September 30, 2021, management has started the process of creating, updating and revising its written policies and procedures. I commend management for their efforts. However, I strongly recommend that management and board complete the written procurement policies and procedures and written standards of conduct covering organizational conflicts of interest prior to start of the 2024 audit. Views of Responsible Officials: Management concurs with this audit finding.

Finding 2023-003 Pass-Through Entity: Federated States of Micronesia National Government Federal Agency: U.S Department of the Interior AL Program: 15.875 Economic, Social, and Political Development of the Territories Federal Award No: Various Area: Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment Questioned Costs: $223,588 Criteria: The following must be adhered to comply with federal and the State’s procurement regulations: • 2 CFR 200.318 requires documentation sufficient to detail the history of each procurement transaction, including the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and basis for contract price. • 2 CFR 200.319 requires all procurement transactions under a federal award to be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition. • 2 CFR 200.320 permits small purchases without soliciting competitive quotations if the price is deemed reasonable based on research, experience, or purchase history, provided supporting documentation is maintained. • The State’s procurement regulations require that small purchases exceeding $1,000 be supported by three quotations, with the lowest quotation selected unless a waiver is documented and approved. Waiver justifications must be submitted to the State treasury for inclusion in the procurement file. Condition: For 5 (or 8%) of 60 transactions tested, test population aggregating $1,187,753 out of $19,504,751 in program expenditures, we noted based on our review of procurement files: • For test no. 15, obligation 361854 – Of 3 quotations obtained for a small purchase transaction, the highest quotation was selected, there was no documented justification to support the procurement selection. • For test no. 16, obligation 372216 – The procurement was sourced from one vendor and lacks additional quotations. There was no documented justification to support the sole-source procurement. • For test no. 17, obligation 372215 – The procurement was sourced from one vendor and lacks additional quotations. There was no documented justification to support the sole-source procurement. • For test no. 22, obligation 334914 – The procurement file included 2 quotations and a justification form that did not relate to the transaction as it cites an explanation for purchasing goods from other vendors unrelated to the actual transaction. Of the 2 vendors included, there did not appear to be a notable difference in goods/services offered, however the higher of the 2 was selected. Consequently, we could not determine the ultimate basis for vendor selection. • For test no. 30, obligation 358537 – The procurement as sourced from one vendor and lacks additional quotations. There was no documented justification for the sole-source procurement. Total questioned costs are summarized as follows: Cause: Ineffective documentation filing and retention controls, further impacted by the relocation of the State Treasury office. Effect: The State is not in compliance with federal and State procurement requirements. Known questioned costs of $223,588 are reported, with projected questioned costs exceeding $25,000. Recommendation: The State should strengthen procurement documentation controls and ensure rationales and justifications for vendor selection are retained in procurement files. Identification as a Repeat Finding: N/A View of Responsible Officials: The State’s response and corrective action plan addressing this finding is included in the accompanying corrective action plan.

Finding 2023-003 Pass-Through Entity: Federated States of Micronesia National Government Federal Agency: U.S Department of the Interior AL Program: 15.875 Economic, Social, and Political Development of the Territories Federal Award No: Various Area: Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment Questioned Costs: $223,588 Criteria: The following must be adhered to comply with federal and the State’s procurement regulations: • 2 CFR 200.318 requires documentation sufficient to detail the history of each procurement transaction, including the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and basis for contract price. • 2 CFR 200.319 requires all procurement transactions under a federal award to be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition. • 2 CFR 200.320 permits small purchases without soliciting competitive quotations if the price is deemed reasonable based on research, experience, or purchase history, provided supporting documentation is maintained. • The State’s procurement regulations require that small purchases exceeding $1,000 be supported by three quotations, with the lowest quotation selected unless a waiver is documented and approved. Waiver justifications must be submitted to the State treasury for inclusion in the procurement file. Condition: For 5 (or 8%) of 60 transactions tested, test population aggregating $1,187,753 out of $19,504,751 in program expenditures, we noted based on our review of procurement files: • For test no. 15, obligation 361854 – Of 3 quotations obtained for a small purchase transaction, the highest quotation was selected, there was no documented justification to support the procurement selection. • For test no. 16, obligation 372216 – The procurement was sourced from one vendor and lacks additional quotations. There was no documented justification to support the sole-source procurement. • For test no. 17, obligation 372215 – The procurement was sourced from one vendor and lacks additional quotations. There was no documented justification to support the sole-source procurement. • For test no. 22, obligation 334914 – The procurement file included 2 quotations and a justification form that did not relate to the transaction as it cites an explanation for purchasing goods from other vendors unrelated to the actual transaction. Of the 2 vendors included, there did not appear to be a notable difference in goods/services offered, however the higher of the 2 was selected. Consequently, we could not determine the ultimate basis for vendor selection. • For test no. 30, obligation 358537 – The procurement as sourced from one vendor and lacks additional quotations. There was no documented justification for the sole-source procurement. Total questioned costs are summarized as follows: Cause: Ineffective documentation filing and retention controls, further impacted by the relocation of the State Treasury office. Effect: The State is not in compliance with federal and State procurement requirements. Known questioned costs of $223,588 are reported, with projected questioned costs exceeding $25,000. Recommendation: The State should strengthen procurement documentation controls and ensure rationales and justifications for vendor selection are retained in procurement files. Identification as a Repeat Finding: N/A View of Responsible Officials: The State’s response and corrective action plan addressing this finding is included in the accompanying corrective action plan.

AAIHB distributed gift cards to both salaried employees and independent contractors as a gesture of appreciation for working extended hours related to COVID-19 contact tracing efforts. The total value of the gift cards was approximately $4,125 and was charged to the COVID-19: Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity grant (AL #93.231). For contractors, these gift cards were provided in addition to their regular compensation. The gift card disbursements were not processed through payroll nor formalized in contract terms, and there is no documentation indicating the entity obtained approval from the awarding agency. In accordance with 2 CFR § 200.403, costs charged to federal awards must be necessary, reasonable, allocable, and conform to limitations set forth in federal regulations. Per 2 CFR § 200.421(e)(3), the cost of gifts—including cash or cash equivalents such as gift cards—is generally unallowable. Compensation for employees must comply with 2 CFR § 200.430, including support through written policies and documentation of time and effort. Contractor payments must align with procurement standards in 2 CFR § 200.318–200.324 and be governed by written contracts. The use of federal funds to provide gift cards constitutes an unallowable cost under Uniform Guidance. The questioned amount may be subject to repayment to the awarding agency or passthrough entity. The auditee sought to recognize the extraordinary efforts of personnel during the COVID-19 public health response. However, they were unaware that the use of gift cards for this purpose was inconsistent with Uniform Guidance and lacked prior approval or supporting policy. We recommend the auditee discontinue the use of federal funds for gift card distributions. All compensation for employees should be processed through payroll, supported by appropriate documentation and internal policies. Payments to contractors should be governed by written contracts and comply with applicable procurement standards. If the auditee believes these costs are justifiable, they should consult the awarding agency for a determination and, if necessary, reimburse the federal award.