Finding 2024-003 – Material Weakness Award No.: Assistance List No. 15.555 and No. 15.074 Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation. AL No. 15.074 Passed-through the Del Puerto Water District. Compliance Requirement: Procurement, Suspension and Debarment. Condition: The following conditions were noted during the single audit: The District was not able to provide evidence that procurements for the Mendota Pool Fish Screen and Control Structure Project and Poso Canal Bridge Replacement Project design contractors under AL 15.555 met the requirements for adequate price competition and was unable to provide documentation confirming the sole-source solicitations met the requirements of Uniform Guidance. Specifically the District was unable to provide evidence it received enough statements of qualification to have adequate price competition or complied with one or more provisions of Section 200.210(c) that allows a sole source agreement to occur. It would appear the District would need evidence that the grantor approved the sole source procurement, but was not able to provide documentation of approvals of sole source procurements by the grantors. The District also was unable to provide documentation of the advertisement of the solicitation of requests for qualifications for the Fish Screen and Control Structure Project. The District was not able to provide adequate documentation that the Mendota Pool Fish Screen and Control Structure Project contract under AL 15.555 and Orestimba Creek Recharge and Recovery Expansion Project contract under AL 15.074 complied with Section 200.327 and appendix II to this part requiring federal contract provisions to be included in the approved contract. This resulted in the District not having evidence that the contractor certified it was in compliance with all required federal provisions. Criteria: Uniform Guidance states the following: Section 200.318(i) states that “The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractors selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price.” Section 300.320(c) states “There are specific circumstances in which the recipient or subrecipient may use a noncompetitive procurement method. The noncompetitive procurement method may only be used if one of the following circumstances applies: (1) The aggregate amount of the procurement transaction does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold (see paragraph (a)(1) of this section); (2) The procurement transaction can only be fulfilled by a single source; (3) The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from providing public notice of a competitive solicitation; (4) The recipient or subrecipient requests in writing to use a noncompetitive procurement method, and the Federal agency or pass-through entity provides written approval; or (5) After soliciting several sources, competition is determined inadequate. The provisions of the Brooks Act (49 United State Code, Section 1104) require local agencies to award federally funded engineering and design related contracts, otherwise know as A&E contracts, on the basis of fair and open competitive negotiations, demonstrated competence, and professional qualifications (23 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 172) at a fair and reasonable price (48 CFR 31.201-3). Both federal regulation and California state law (Government Code 4525-4529 et a) require selection of A&E consultant services on the basis of demonstrated competence and professional qualifications. Procurement by noncompetitive proposals may be used only when the award of a contract is infeasible under small purchase procedures, sealed bids or competitive proposals, as cited above. Section 200.327 states “The non-federal entity’s contracts must contain the applicable provisions described in appendix II to this part.” Appendix II contains requirements to include in federally funded contracts termination for cause and convenience provisions, Equal Employment Opportunity provisions, Davis-Bacon Act provisions, Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act provisions, Clean Air Act provisions, debarment and suspension provisions, Byrd Anti-Lobbying Amendment provisions, and other provisions, as applicable. Cause: The current staff was not able to find procurement documentation prepared before they were hired. Effect: The District was unable to provide evidence that it was in compliance with the requirement to maintain documentation indicating the procurement was in compliance with Uniform Guidance Sections 200.318 to 200.327 and appendix II to this part. Context: The original procurement for the consulting firm for the Mendota Pool Fish Screens and Control Structure project was performed in September 2018 and awarded in late October 2018. This procurement precedes the current staff. Staff indicated the grantor approved the Mendota Pool Fish Screen and Control Structure Project sole source procurement and the Board Resolution approving the agreement indicated the grantor approved the sole source procurement, but staff was not able to provide proof of written approval by the grantor. Recommendation: We recommend management implement additional controls over the procurement process that ensures each procurement complies with Uniform Guidance Section 200.318 to 200.326, including training of staff working on procurements of the documentation retention and other requirements under the Uniform Guidance. We further recommend the District establish a procurement folder on its server with subfolder for each individual procurement where documentation of each procurement is maintained, including advertising of the procurement, requests for proposals/qualifications with language that satisfies Uniform Guidance requirements, proposals received, executed contracts, certifications of compliance with federal contracting provisions by the contractor if not part of the proposal or executed contracts, documented quantitative and qualitative analysis indicating why the recommended bid was selected for approval, management report to board recommending which bid should be approved, board resolution approving the winning bid and for contracts under $250,000 a memo or form documenting bids received and reason for selecting the bid, including reasons for not selecting the lowest bid if applicable. If a sole source procurement method is used, documentation showing the sole source procurement is allowable under criteria listed in Section 300.320(c) should be retained. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management’s response and planned corrective action is included in the Corrective Action Plan included at the end of the report.
Finding 2024-003 – Material Weakness Award No.: Assistance List No. 15.555 and No. 15.074 Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation. AL No. 15.074 Passed-through the Del Puerto Water District. Compliance Requirement: Procurement, Suspension and Debarment. Condition: The following conditions were noted during the single audit: The District was not able to provide evidence that procurements for the Mendota Pool Fish Screen and Control Structure Project and Poso Canal Bridge Replacement Project design contractors under AL 15.555 met the requirements for adequate price competition and was unable to provide documentation confirming the sole-source solicitations met the requirements of Uniform Guidance. Specifically the District was unable to provide evidence it received enough statements of qualification to have adequate price competition or complied with one or more provisions of Section 200.210(c) that allows a sole source agreement to occur. It would appear the District would need evidence that the grantor approved the sole source procurement, but was not able to provide documentation of approvals of sole source procurements by the grantors. The District also was unable to provide documentation of the advertisement of the solicitation of requests for qualifications for the Fish Screen and Control Structure Project. The District was not able to provide adequate documentation that the Mendota Pool Fish Screen and Control Structure Project contract under AL 15.555 and Orestimba Creek Recharge and Recovery Expansion Project contract under AL 15.074 complied with Section 200.327 and appendix II to this part requiring federal contract provisions to be included in the approved contract. This resulted in the District not having evidence that the contractor certified it was in compliance with all required federal provisions. Criteria: Uniform Guidance states the following: Section 200.318(i) states that “The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractors selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price.” Section 300.320(c) states “There are specific circumstances in which the recipient or subrecipient may use a noncompetitive procurement method. The noncompetitive procurement method may only be used if one of the following circumstances applies: (1) The aggregate amount of the procurement transaction does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold (see paragraph (a)(1) of this section); (2) The procurement transaction can only be fulfilled by a single source; (3) The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from providing public notice of a competitive solicitation; (4) The recipient or subrecipient requests in writing to use a noncompetitive procurement method, and the Federal agency or pass-through entity provides written approval; or (5) After soliciting several sources, competition is determined inadequate. The provisions of the Brooks Act (49 United State Code, Section 1104) require local agencies to award federally funded engineering and design related contracts, otherwise know as A&E contracts, on the basis of fair and open competitive negotiations, demonstrated competence, and professional qualifications (23 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 172) at a fair and reasonable price (48 CFR 31.201-3). Both federal regulation and California state law (Government Code 4525-4529 et a) require selection of A&E consultant services on the basis of demonstrated competence and professional qualifications. Procurement by noncompetitive proposals may be used only when the award of a contract is infeasible under small purchase procedures, sealed bids or competitive proposals, as cited above. Section 200.327 states “The non-federal entity’s contracts must contain the applicable provisions described in appendix II to this part.” Appendix II contains requirements to include in federally funded contracts termination for cause and convenience provisions, Equal Employment Opportunity provisions, Davis-Bacon Act provisions, Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act provisions, Clean Air Act provisions, debarment and suspension provisions, Byrd Anti-Lobbying Amendment provisions, and other provisions, as applicable. Cause: The current staff was not able to find procurement documentation prepared before they were hired. Effect: The District was unable to provide evidence that it was in compliance with the requirement to maintain documentation indicating the procurement was in compliance with Uniform Guidance Sections 200.318 to 200.327 and appendix II to this part. Context: The original procurement for the consulting firm for the Mendota Pool Fish Screens and Control Structure project was performed in September 2018 and awarded in late October 2018. This procurement precedes the current staff. Staff indicated the grantor approved the Mendota Pool Fish Screen and Control Structure Project sole source procurement and the Board Resolution approving the agreement indicated the grantor approved the sole source procurement, but staff was not able to provide proof of written approval by the grantor. Recommendation: We recommend management implement additional controls over the procurement process that ensures each procurement complies with Uniform Guidance Section 200.318 to 200.326, including training of staff working on procurements of the documentation retention and other requirements under the Uniform Guidance. We further recommend the District establish a procurement folder on its server with subfolder for each individual procurement where documentation of each procurement is maintained, including advertising of the procurement, requests for proposals/qualifications with language that satisfies Uniform Guidance requirements, proposals received, executed contracts, certifications of compliance with federal contracting provisions by the contractor if not part of the proposal or executed contracts, documented quantitative and qualitative analysis indicating why the recommended bid was selected for approval, management report to board recommending which bid should be approved, board resolution approving the winning bid and for contracts under $250,000 a memo or form documenting bids received and reason for selecting the bid, including reasons for not selecting the lowest bid if applicable. If a sole source procurement method is used, documentation showing the sole source procurement is allowable under criteria listed in Section 300.320(c) should be retained. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management’s response and planned corrective action is included in the Corrective Action Plan included at the end of the report.
Finding 2024-003 – Material Weakness Award No.: Assistance List No. 15.555 and No. 15.074 Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation. AL No. 15.074 Passed-through the Del Puerto Water District. Compliance Requirement: Procurement, Suspension and Debarment. Condition: The following conditions were noted during the single audit: The District was not able to provide evidence that procurements for the Mendota Pool Fish Screen and Control Structure Project and Poso Canal Bridge Replacement Project design contractors under AL 15.555 met the requirements for adequate price competition and was unable to provide documentation confirming the sole-source solicitations met the requirements of Uniform Guidance. Specifically the District was unable to provide evidence it received enough statements of qualification to have adequate price competition or complied with one or more provisions of Section 200.210(c) that allows a sole source agreement to occur. It would appear the District would need evidence that the grantor approved the sole source procurement, but was not able to provide documentation of approvals of sole source procurements by the grantors. The District also was unable to provide documentation of the advertisement of the solicitation of requests for qualifications for the Fish Screen and Control Structure Project. The District was not able to provide adequate documentation that the Mendota Pool Fish Screen and Control Structure Project contract under AL 15.555 and Orestimba Creek Recharge and Recovery Expansion Project contract under AL 15.074 complied with Section 200.327 and appendix II to this part requiring federal contract provisions to be included in the approved contract. This resulted in the District not having evidence that the contractor certified it was in compliance with all required federal provisions. Criteria: Uniform Guidance states the following: Section 200.318(i) states that “The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractors selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price.” Section 300.320(c) states “There are specific circumstances in which the recipient or subrecipient may use a noncompetitive procurement method. The noncompetitive procurement method may only be used if one of the following circumstances applies: (1) The aggregate amount of the procurement transaction does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold (see paragraph (a)(1) of this section); (2) The procurement transaction can only be fulfilled by a single source; (3) The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from providing public notice of a competitive solicitation; (4) The recipient or subrecipient requests in writing to use a noncompetitive procurement method, and the Federal agency or pass-through entity provides written approval; or (5) After soliciting several sources, competition is determined inadequate. The provisions of the Brooks Act (49 United State Code, Section 1104) require local agencies to award federally funded engineering and design related contracts, otherwise know as A&E contracts, on the basis of fair and open competitive negotiations, demonstrated competence, and professional qualifications (23 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 172) at a fair and reasonable price (48 CFR 31.201-3). Both federal regulation and California state law (Government Code 4525-4529 et a) require selection of A&E consultant services on the basis of demonstrated competence and professional qualifications. Procurement by noncompetitive proposals may be used only when the award of a contract is infeasible under small purchase procedures, sealed bids or competitive proposals, as cited above. Section 200.327 states “The non-federal entity’s contracts must contain the applicable provisions described in appendix II to this part.” Appendix II contains requirements to include in federally funded contracts termination for cause and convenience provisions, Equal Employment Opportunity provisions, Davis-Bacon Act provisions, Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act provisions, Clean Air Act provisions, debarment and suspension provisions, Byrd Anti-Lobbying Amendment provisions, and other provisions, as applicable. Cause: The current staff was not able to find procurement documentation prepared before they were hired. Effect: The District was unable to provide evidence that it was in compliance with the requirement to maintain documentation indicating the procurement was in compliance with Uniform Guidance Sections 200.318 to 200.327 and appendix II to this part. Context: The original procurement for the consulting firm for the Mendota Pool Fish Screens and Control Structure project was performed in September 2018 and awarded in late October 2018. This procurement precedes the current staff. Staff indicated the grantor approved the Mendota Pool Fish Screen and Control Structure Project sole source procurement and the Board Resolution approving the agreement indicated the grantor approved the sole source procurement, but staff was not able to provide proof of written approval by the grantor. Recommendation: We recommend management implement additional controls over the procurement process that ensures each procurement complies with Uniform Guidance Section 200.318 to 200.326, including training of staff working on procurements of the documentation retention and other requirements under the Uniform Guidance. We further recommend the District establish a procurement folder on its server with subfolder for each individual procurement where documentation of each procurement is maintained, including advertising of the procurement, requests for proposals/qualifications with language that satisfies Uniform Guidance requirements, proposals received, executed contracts, certifications of compliance with federal contracting provisions by the contractor if not part of the proposal or executed contracts, documented quantitative and qualitative analysis indicating why the recommended bid was selected for approval, management report to board recommending which bid should be approved, board resolution approving the winning bid and for contracts under $250,000 a memo or form documenting bids received and reason for selecting the bid, including reasons for not selecting the lowest bid if applicable. If a sole source procurement method is used, documentation showing the sole source procurement is allowable under criteria listed in Section 300.320(c) should be retained. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management’s response and planned corrective action is included in the Corrective Action Plan included at the end of the report.
FINDING 2024-002 Subject: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Federal Program: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listings Number: 21.027 Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): Contract #65851 Pass-Through Entity: Schneck Medical Center Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2023-001. Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not in place at the City to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Procurement Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is customarily set at $250,000. However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold of $150,000 or less for when small purchase procedures may be used. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. One vendor was identified that fell within the small purchase threshold. Purchases from the vendor totaled $148,800. As such, price or rate quotations from an adequate number of qualified sources should have been obtained. However, the City did not obtain price or rate quotations for the purchases, nor was full and open competition provided for the vendor. Additionally, there was no documentation available to support the rationale to limit competition. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 15 CITY OF SEYMOUR SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with the COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF) award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the Excluded Parties List System (EPLS), collecting a certification from that person, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. The City did not have policies or procedures in place for verifying that an entity with which it planned to enter into a covered transaction was not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded until November 25, 2024. One of the two vendors selected for testing, with covered transactions totaling $148,800, was not verified to ensure that the vendor was not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues until the City implemented new policies and procedures in November 2024. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases — INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 16 CITY OF SEYMOUR SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . . 31 CFR 19.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the EPLS; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person if allowed by this rule; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause The City did not have a procurement policy in place that contained the requirements of the procurement standards as outlined in the Code of Federal Regulations prior to entering into an agreement with the vendor. Due to the timing of the adoption of the City's Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Policy, which defines procedures to ensure they are properly procuring services and verifying suspension and debarment status for covered transactions, not all of the items selected for testing were in compliance. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the City cannot ensure that goods and services are appropriately procured and that contractors paid with federal funds are eligible to participate in federal programs. Any program funds the City used to pay contractors that have been suspended or debarred would be unallowable, and the funding agency could potentially recover them. Furthermore, noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the City. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended adhering to the newly implemented procurement policies to ensure compliance with state and federal laws and regulations for procuring goods and services paid with federal funds. We also recommended that management of the City adhere to its newly approved policy of internal controls to ensure that all contractors that are expected to be paid $25,000 or more, all or in part with federal funds, are not suspended or debarred from participating in federal programs before entering into covered transactions. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
Finding #24-001 – Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Financial Reporting: Procurement Program Names: 3rd Street Housing Project Eagle Community Pool Replacement CFDA Titles and Numbers: 21.027 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Federal Agency: United States Treasury Pass-through Agency: Colorado Department of Local Affairs Award Year: December 31, 2024 Condition: No formal Federal procurement policy has been adopted by the Town of Eagle, Colorado, resulting in a lack of internal controls over Federal procurement. Criteria or Specific Requirement: The Town of Eagle, Colorado, must comply with procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.303 and 200.318 through 200.326 within Uniform Guidance. Per 2 CFR section 200.303(a), a non-Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). UG §200.318 General Procurement Standards. (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, section of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. UG §200.320 states that the non-Federal entity must use one of the prescribed methods of procurement: (a) Informal Procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in §200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement or property or services at or below the SAT include: (1) Micro-purchases. Procurement by micro-purchase is the acquisition of supplies or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold (see definition of micro-purchase in §200.1). To the maximum extent practicable, the non-Federal entity should distribute micro-purchases equitably among qualified suppliers. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price or equitably among qualified suppliers. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price or rate quotations if the non-Federal entity considers the price to be reasonable based on research, experience, purchase history or other information and documents it files accordingly. Purchase cards can be used for micro-purchases if procedures are documented and approved by the non-Federal entity. (2) Small purchase. Procurement by small purchase is the acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is greater than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. (b) Formal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal financial assistance award exceeds the SAT, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require following documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a non-competitive procurement can be used in accordance with §200.319 or paragraph (c) of this section. The following formal methods of procurement are used for procurement of property or services above the simplified acquisition threshold or a value below the simplified acquisition threshold the non-Federal entity determines to be appropriate: (1) Sealed Bids. Bids are publicly solicited, and a firm fixed-price contract (lump sum or unit price) is awarded to the responsible bidder whose bid, conforming with all the material terms and conditions of the invitation for bids, is the lowest in price. (2) Proposals. Either a fixed price or cost-reimbursement-type contract is awarded. Proposals are generally used when conditions are not appropriate for the use of sealed bids. (c) Noncompetitive procurement. There are specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. Noncompetitive procurement can only be awarded if one or more of the allowed circumstances apply. Questioned Costs: N/A Context: Although the Town of Eagle, Colorado, had not adopted a formal Federal procurement policy as outlined in 2CFR sections 200.303 and 200.318 through 200.326, during the course of our federal single audit testing of transactions and contracts, we found that the Town’s general contract purchase procedures that were followed meet the requirements of the Uniform Guidance and that no contracts were awarded without proper justification in 7 or 7 procurement transactions tested. Cause: Management was not aware of the requirement of adopting a formal Federal procurement policy under the procurement standards set out at 2CFR sections 200.303 and 200.318 through 200.626 within Uniform Guidance. Effect: The Town of Eagle, Colorado, is at risk for noncompliance with Federal grants as it relates to procurement. Recommendation: We recommend that the Town of Eagle, Colorado, adopts a formal Federal procurement policy to include all elements identified in 2CFR Sections 200.303 and 200.318 through 200.626. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Management agrees with this finding and will adopt a formal Federal procurement policy which includes all elements identified in 2CFR Sections 200.303 and 200.318 through 200.626.
Finding #24-003 – Procurement Program Names: 3rd Street Housing Project Eagle Community Pool Replacement CFDA Titles and Numbers: 21.027 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Federal Agency: United States Treasury Pass-through Agency: Colorado Department of Local Affairs Award Year: December 31, 2024 Condition: No formal Federal procurement policy has been adopted by the Town of Eagle, Colorado, resulting in a lack of compliance with Federal procurement. Criteria or Specific Requirement: The Town of Eagle, Colorado, must comply with procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.303 and 200.318 through 200.326 within Uniform Guidance. Per 2 CFR section 200.303(a), a non-Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). UG §200.318 General Procurement Standards. (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, section of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. UG §200.320 states that the non-Federal entity must use one of the prescribed methods of procurement: (a) Informal Procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in §200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement or property or services at or below the SAT include: (1) Micro-purchases. Procurement by micro-purchase is the acquisition of supplies or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold (see definition of micro-purchase in §200.1). To the maximum extent practicable, the non-Federal entity should distribute micro-purchases equitably among qualified suppliers. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price or rate quotations if the non-Federal entity considers the price to be reasonable based on research, experience, purchase history or other information and documents it files accordingly. Purchase cards can be used for micro-purchases if procedures are documented and approved by the non-Federal entity. (2) Small purchase. Procurement by small purchase is the acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is greater than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. (b) Formal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal financial assistance award exceeds the SAT, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require following documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a non-competitive procurement can be used in accordance with §200.319 or paragraph (c) of this section. The following formal methods of procurement are used for procurement of property or services above the simplified acquisition threshold or a value below the simplified acquisition threshold the non-Federal entity determines to be appropriate: (1) Sealed Bids. Bids are publicly solicited, and a firm fixed-price contract (lump sum or unit price) is awarded to the responsible bidder whose bid, conforming with all the material terms and conditions of the invitation for bids, is the lowest in price. (2) Proposals. Either a fixed price or cost-reimbursement-type contract is awarded. Proposals are generally used when conditions are not appropriate for the use of sealed bids. (c) Noncompetitive procurement. There are specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. Noncompetitive procurement can only be awarded if one or more of the allowed circumstances apply. Questioned Costs: N/A Context: Although the Town of Eagle, Colorado, had not adopted a formal Federal procurement policy as outlined in 2CFR sections 200.303 and 200.318 through 200.326, during the course of our federal single audit testing of transactions and contracts, we found that the Town’s general contract purchase procedures that were followed meet the requirements of the Uniform Guidance and that no contracts were awarded without proper justification in 7 or 7 procurement transactions tested. Cause: Management was not aware of the requirement of adopting a formal Federal procurement policy under the procurement standards set out at 2CFR sections 200.303 and 200.318 through 200.626 within Uniform Guidance. Effect: The Town of Eagle, Colorado, is at risk for noncompliance with Federal grants as it relates to procurement. Recommendation: We recommend that the Town of Eagle, Colorado, adopts a formal Federal procurement policy to include all elements identified in 2CFR Sections 200.303 and 200.318 through 200.626. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Management agrees with this finding and will adopt a formal Federal procurement policy which includes all elements identified in 2CFR Sections 200.303 and 200.318 through 200.626.
Finding #24-001 – Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Financial Reporting: Procurement Program Names: 3rd Street Housing Project Eagle Community Pool Replacement CFDA Titles and Numbers: 21.027 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Federal Agency: United States Treasury Pass-through Agency: Colorado Department of Local Affairs Award Year: December 31, 2024 Condition: No formal Federal procurement policy has been adopted by the Town of Eagle, Colorado, resulting in a lack of internal controls over Federal procurement. Criteria or Specific Requirement: The Town of Eagle, Colorado, must comply with procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.303 and 200.318 through 200.326 within Uniform Guidance. Per 2 CFR section 200.303(a), a non-Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). UG §200.318 General Procurement Standards. (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, section of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. UG §200.320 states that the non-Federal entity must use one of the prescribed methods of procurement: (a) Informal Procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in §200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement or property or services at or below the SAT include: (1) Micro-purchases. Procurement by micro-purchase is the acquisition of supplies or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold (see definition of micro-purchase in §200.1). To the maximum extent practicable, the non-Federal entity should distribute micro-purchases equitably among qualified suppliers. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price or equitably among qualified suppliers. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price or rate quotations if the non-Federal entity considers the price to be reasonable based on research, experience, purchase history or other information and documents it files accordingly. Purchase cards can be used for micro-purchases if procedures are documented and approved by the non-Federal entity. (2) Small purchase. Procurement by small purchase is the acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is greater than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. (b) Formal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal financial assistance award exceeds the SAT, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require following documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a non-competitive procurement can be used in accordance with §200.319 or paragraph (c) of this section. The following formal methods of procurement are used for procurement of property or services above the simplified acquisition threshold or a value below the simplified acquisition threshold the non-Federal entity determines to be appropriate: (1) Sealed Bids. Bids are publicly solicited, and a firm fixed-price contract (lump sum or unit price) is awarded to the responsible bidder whose bid, conforming with all the material terms and conditions of the invitation for bids, is the lowest in price. (2) Proposals. Either a fixed price or cost-reimbursement-type contract is awarded. Proposals are generally used when conditions are not appropriate for the use of sealed bids. (c) Noncompetitive procurement. There are specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. Noncompetitive procurement can only be awarded if one or more of the allowed circumstances apply. Questioned Costs: N/A Context: Although the Town of Eagle, Colorado, had not adopted a formal Federal procurement policy as outlined in 2CFR sections 200.303 and 200.318 through 200.326, during the course of our federal single audit testing of transactions and contracts, we found that the Town’s general contract purchase procedures that were followed meet the requirements of the Uniform Guidance and that no contracts were awarded without proper justification in 7 or 7 procurement transactions tested. Cause: Management was not aware of the requirement of adopting a formal Federal procurement policy under the procurement standards set out at 2CFR sections 200.303 and 200.318 through 200.626 within Uniform Guidance. Effect: The Town of Eagle, Colorado, is at risk for noncompliance with Federal grants as it relates to procurement. Recommendation: We recommend that the Town of Eagle, Colorado, adopts a formal Federal procurement policy to include all elements identified in 2CFR Sections 200.303 and 200.318 through 200.626. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Management agrees with this finding and will adopt a formal Federal procurement policy which includes all elements identified in 2CFR Sections 200.303 and 200.318 through 200.626.
Finding #24-003 – Procurement Program Names: 3rd Street Housing Project Eagle Community Pool Replacement CFDA Titles and Numbers: 21.027 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Federal Agency: United States Treasury Pass-through Agency: Colorado Department of Local Affairs Award Year: December 31, 2024 Condition: No formal Federal procurement policy has been adopted by the Town of Eagle, Colorado, resulting in a lack of compliance with Federal procurement. Criteria or Specific Requirement: The Town of Eagle, Colorado, must comply with procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.303 and 200.318 through 200.326 within Uniform Guidance. Per 2 CFR section 200.303(a), a non-Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). UG §200.318 General Procurement Standards. (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, section of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. UG §200.320 states that the non-Federal entity must use one of the prescribed methods of procurement: (a) Informal Procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in §200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement or property or services at or below the SAT include: (1) Micro-purchases. Procurement by micro-purchase is the acquisition of supplies or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold (see definition of micro-purchase in §200.1). To the maximum extent practicable, the non-Federal entity should distribute micro-purchases equitably among qualified suppliers. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price or rate quotations if the non-Federal entity considers the price to be reasonable based on research, experience, purchase history or other information and documents it files accordingly. Purchase cards can be used for micro-purchases if procedures are documented and approved by the non-Federal entity. (2) Small purchase. Procurement by small purchase is the acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is greater than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. (b) Formal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal financial assistance award exceeds the SAT, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require following documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a non-competitive procurement can be used in accordance with §200.319 or paragraph (c) of this section. The following formal methods of procurement are used for procurement of property or services above the simplified acquisition threshold or a value below the simplified acquisition threshold the non-Federal entity determines to be appropriate: (1) Sealed Bids. Bids are publicly solicited, and a firm fixed-price contract (lump sum or unit price) is awarded to the responsible bidder whose bid, conforming with all the material terms and conditions of the invitation for bids, is the lowest in price. (2) Proposals. Either a fixed price or cost-reimbursement-type contract is awarded. Proposals are generally used when conditions are not appropriate for the use of sealed bids. (c) Noncompetitive procurement. There are specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. Noncompetitive procurement can only be awarded if one or more of the allowed circumstances apply. Questioned Costs: N/A Context: Although the Town of Eagle, Colorado, had not adopted a formal Federal procurement policy as outlined in 2CFR sections 200.303 and 200.318 through 200.326, during the course of our federal single audit testing of transactions and contracts, we found that the Town’s general contract purchase procedures that were followed meet the requirements of the Uniform Guidance and that no contracts were awarded without proper justification in 7 or 7 procurement transactions tested. Cause: Management was not aware of the requirement of adopting a formal Federal procurement policy under the procurement standards set out at 2CFR sections 200.303 and 200.318 through 200.626 within Uniform Guidance. Effect: The Town of Eagle, Colorado, is at risk for noncompliance with Federal grants as it relates to procurement. Recommendation: We recommend that the Town of Eagle, Colorado, adopts a formal Federal procurement policy to include all elements identified in 2CFR Sections 200.303 and 200.318 through 200.626. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Management agrees with this finding and will adopt a formal Federal procurement policy which includes all elements identified in 2CFR Sections 200.303 and 200.318 through 200.626.
SECTION III - FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS FOR FEDERAL AWARDS Finding 2024-001: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment (Significant Deficiency) Federal Agency: U.S. Department of the Treasury Assistance Listing Number and Title: 21.027 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Federal award year: 2024 Criteria: Per 2 CFR §200.318, General procurement Standards, a recipient or subrecipient of Federal awards must maintain and use documented procedures for procurement transactions under a Federal award or subaward, including for acquisition of property or services. These documented procurement procedures must be consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards identified in sections 200.317 through 200.327, as appropriate. The recipient or subrecipient must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of each procurement transaction. These records must include the rationale for the procurement method, contract type selection, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. In addition, non-Federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. When a non-Federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the non-Federal entity must verify that the entity is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. This verification may be accomplished by: (1) checking SAM.gov Exclusions, (2) collecting a certification from that entity, or (3) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that entity (2 CFR §180.300). Condition/Context: From a sample of five (5) procurement transactions, there was no evidence that management performed simplified acquisition procedures relating to obtaining price and rate quotations from an adequate number of qualified sources for three (3) of the transactions tested. Further, for these three (3) transactions, there was no evidence that management completed procedures to verify whether the vendors were suspended or debarred. Cause: The USGA has significant prior history and experience in conducting competitive procurement processes for projects relating to improvements made to golf courses. Based on the USGA’s familiarity with vendors that perform such services, including knowledge of vendor pricing, qualifications, and other relevant factors, simplified acquisition procedures and suspension and debarment verification were not consistently performed. Effect: Procurement transactions could be conducted in a manner that does not provide full and open competition. Further, covered transactions could be entered into with an entity that is suspended or debarred. Questioned Costs: None identified Identified as a Repeat Finding: No Recommendations: We recommend that the USGA strengthen its policies and procedures relating to documentation of procurement decisions and suspension and debarment verifications. Vies of Responsible Officials: Refer to Corrective Action Plan.
Federal Program Name: Research and Development Cluster: Uniformed Services University Medical Research Projects Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Defense Federal Assistance Listing Number: 12.750 Criteria or Specific Requirement: Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Condition: The Organization’s policies do not contain adequate documentation to demonstrate compliance with federal procurement, and suspension and debarment regulations. Effect: Without adequate procurement policies and documentation of suspension and debarment checks, the auditee may inadvertently award contracts to ineligible vendors. Questioned Costs: None Context: The Organization’s documented procurement policies do not contain all of the specific requirements of 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Additionally, the Organization’s policies do not contain all the specific requirements of 2 CFR sections 180 and 200.14 regarding suspension and debarment. Cause: The writing of the policy did not take into account the federal procurement, suspension and debarment regulations which are required to be incorporated for items procured with federal funds. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization revise its policies to incorporate all required elements of the federal procurement, suspension and debarment regulations. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The Organization agrees with the comment and will revise its policies to incorporate all required elements of the federal procurement, suspension and debarment regulations.
Federal Program Name: Research and Development Cluster: Uniformed Services University Medical Research Projects Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Defense Federal Assistance Listing Number: 12.750 Criteria or Specific Requirement: Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Condition: The Organization’s policies do not contain adequate documentation to demonstrate compliance with federal procurement, and suspension and debarment regulations. Effect: Without adequate procurement policies and documentation of suspension and debarment checks, the auditee may inadvertently award contracts to ineligible vendors. Questioned Costs: None Context: The Organization’s documented procurement policies do not contain all of the specific requirements of 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Additionally, the Organization’s policies do not contain all the specific requirements of 2 CFR sections 180 and 200.14 regarding suspension and debarment. Cause: The writing of the policy did not take into account the federal procurement, suspension and debarment regulations which are required to be incorporated for items procured with federal funds. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization revise its policies to incorporate all required elements of the federal procurement, suspension and debarment regulations. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The Organization agrees with the comment and will revise its policies to incorporate all required elements of the federal procurement, suspension and debarment regulations.
Federal Program Name: Research and Development Cluster: Uniformed Services University Medical Research Projects Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Defense Federal Assistance Listing Number: 12.750 Criteria or Specific Requirement: Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Condition: The Organization’s policies do not contain adequate documentation to demonstrate compliance with federal procurement, and suspension and debarment regulations. Effect: Without adequate procurement policies and documentation of suspension and debarment checks, the auditee may inadvertently award contracts to ineligible vendors. Questioned Costs: None Context: The Organization’s documented procurement policies do not contain all of the specific requirements of 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Additionally, the Organization’s policies do not contain all the specific requirements of 2 CFR sections 180 and 200.14 regarding suspension and debarment. Cause: The writing of the policy did not take into account the federal procurement, suspension and debarment regulations which are required to be incorporated for items procured with federal funds. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization revise its policies to incorporate all required elements of the federal procurement, suspension and debarment regulations. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The Organization agrees with the comment and will revise its policies to incorporate all required elements of the federal procurement, suspension and debarment regulations.
Federal Program Name: Research and Development Cluster: Uniformed Services University Medical Research Projects Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Defense Federal Assistance Listing Number: 12.750 Criteria or Specific Requirement: Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Condition: The Organization’s policies do not contain adequate documentation to demonstrate compliance with federal procurement, and suspension and debarment regulations. Effect: Without adequate procurement policies and documentation of suspension and debarment checks, the auditee may inadvertently award contracts to ineligible vendors. Questioned Costs: None Context: The Organization’s documented procurement policies do not contain all of the specific requirements of 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Additionally, the Organization’s policies do not contain all the specific requirements of 2 CFR sections 180 and 200.14 regarding suspension and debarment. Cause: The writing of the policy did not take into account the federal procurement, suspension and debarment regulations which are required to be incorporated for items procured with federal funds. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization revise its policies to incorporate all required elements of the federal procurement, suspension and debarment regulations. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The Organization agrees with the comment and will revise its policies to incorporate all required elements of the federal procurement, suspension and debarment regulations.
Finding 2024-001 Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment Agency and Award: Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Program: Economic Development Imitative, Community Project Funding, and Miscellaneous Grants Assistance Listing Number: 14.251 Federal Award Identification Number: B-23-CP-CA-0141 Criteria: 2 CFR 200.318 states non-federal entities must have and use documented procurement procedures that conform to 2 CFR 200.317 through 200.327. They must use their own documented procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. These standards require non-federal entities to maintain written procedures for procurement transactions to ensure full and open competition, proper cost analysis, and avoidance of conflicts of interest. Condition and context: ASMYCA does not have an internal procurement policy established. Without a formal procurement policy, ASYMCA lacks a consistent framework for vendor selection, contract negotiation, and cost justification. Cause: ASYMCA’s management did not retain evidence in compliance with the above criteria regarding procurement. Effect: ASYMCA’s documentation was lacking evidence of an internal procurement policy. This may lead to inconsistent procurement practices, potential favoritism, increased risk of unallowable costs, or overpayment for goods and services. Questioned costs: None Repeat finding: No Recommendation: ASYMCA develop and implement a formal procurement policy as soon as possible. Views of Responsible Officials: Management concurs with this finding and a response is included in the corrective action plan.
Department of Homeland Security, Iowa Department of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, Federal Financial Assistance Listing 97.039, DR-4457-IA-0040 Hazard Mitigation Grant Program Procurement, Suspension & Debarment Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance and Noncompliance Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303(a) establishes that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal awards that provides assurance that the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. 2 CFR 200.318 maintains that recipients must have and use documented procurement policies and must conform procurement standards in sections 200.317 through 200.327. Condition: The cooperative’s procurement policy had not identified the dollar thresholds of procurement within the methods of procurement. In addition, one contract selected for testing was missing one of the required contract provisions. Cause: The cooperative’s procurement policy is very thorough and identifies the methods of procurement, however, management had not identified the thresholds of procurement included within the policy. Effect: The Cooperative’s policy was missing required information Questioned Costs: None reported. Context/Sampling: A nonstatistical sample of 7 transactions out of 29 transactions were selected for testing, which accounted for $1,134,758 of $3,548,469 federal program expenditures. Repeat Finding form Prior Year: No Recommendation: We recommend the Cooperative review their procurement policy to ensure it includes the dollar thresholds for each of the procurement methods. In addition, we suggest the Cooperative review their contracts to ensure it includes all the required contract provisions. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding.
2024-002 Procurement Federal Agency U.S. Department of the Treasury Federal Assistance Listing Numbers 21.027 – Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Criteria [ X ] Compliance Finding [ ] Significant Deficiency [ X ] Material Weakness Entities receiving federal awards must have and follow documented procurement policies. Title 2 CFR 200.320 outlines acceptable methods of procurement and establishes applicable threshold requirements. Condition During our review of federally funded purchases, we noted several instances where procurement transactions were not conducted in accordance with these federal guidelines. For purchases falling between the micro-purchase threshold and the simplified acquisition threshold, the District did not retain documentation to demonstrate that price quotations were obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. Additionally, for purchases exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the District was unable to provide documentation showing that the required number of bids were solicited. In one instance, a sole source acquisition was made without sufficient written justification, as required by 2 CFR 200.320(c), which permits noncompetitive procurement only under specific and well-documented circumstances. Furthermore, the District could not provide documentation verifying that vendors were screened against the federal System for Award Management (SAM.gov) to confirm that they were not suspended or debarred from participating in federal programs. Lastly, the District could not demonstrate that it performed conflict of interest checks to ensure that employees or officers participated in the selection, award or administration of a contract where conflicts of interest exist. This finding appears to be a systemic problem. Cause The District’s procurement policy was not compared with the federal regulations when it was developed. Management did not follow its established procurement policy and documentation was not maintained evidencing its compliance with the policy. Effect Noncompliance with federal procurement requirements increases the risk of unallowable costs, noncompetitive vendor selection, and potential questioned costs. This could result in financial penalties or the need to return federal funds. The absence of conflict of interest checks also exposes the District to the risk of biased procurement decisions and compromised integrity. Recommendation The District should update and enforce procurement policies and procedures to fully comply with 2 CFR 200.318–200.327. These procedures must include documented competitive procurement processes, appropriate documentation retention, sole source justification protocols, and mandatory screening of vendors through SAM.gov. Written standards of conduct should be maintained and enforced to prevent conflicts of interest. Additionally, all staff involved in procurement should receive comprehensive training on federal procurement requirements and internal control responsibilities. The District should also implement a monitoring process to ensure ongoing compliance with these requirements. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions Two new policies will be implemented; a board policy to cover board approvals for the bidding of large projects and an internal policy and procedure which spells out additional requirements, like requiring three written bids for large purchases. In addition, all members of the Board of Directors and senior leadership team will sign Conflict of Interest statements on an annual basis to confirm that they do not have any potential conflicts that could impact purchasing decisions.
2024-002 Procurement Federal Agency U.S. Department of the Treasury Federal Assistance Listing Numbers 21.027 – Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Criteria [ X ] Compliance Finding [ ] Significant Deficiency [ X ] Material Weakness Entities receiving federal awards must have and follow documented procurement policies. Title 2 CFR 200.320 outlines acceptable methods of procurement and establishes applicable threshold requirements. Condition During our review of federally funded purchases, we noted several instances where procurement transactions were not conducted in accordance with these federal guidelines. For purchases falling between the micro-purchase threshold and the simplified acquisition threshold, the District did not retain documentation to demonstrate that price quotations were obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. Additionally, for purchases exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the District was unable to provide documentation showing that the required number of bids were solicited. In one instance, a sole source acquisition was made without sufficient written justification, as required by 2 CFR 200.320(c), which permits noncompetitive procurement only under specific and well-documented circumstances. Furthermore, the District could not provide documentation verifying that vendors were screened against the federal System for Award Management (SAM.gov) to confirm that they were not suspended or debarred from participating in federal programs. Lastly, the District could not demonstrate that it performed conflict of interest checks to ensure that employees or officers participated in the selection, award or administration of a contract where conflicts of interest exist. This finding appears to be a systemic problem. Cause The District’s procurement policy was not compared with the federal regulations when it was developed. Management did not follow its established procurement policy and documentation was not maintained evidencing its compliance with the policy. Effect Noncompliance with federal procurement requirements increases the risk of unallowable costs, noncompetitive vendor selection, and potential questioned costs. This could result in financial penalties or the need to return federal funds. The absence of conflict of interest checks also exposes the District to the risk of biased procurement decisions and compromised integrity. Recommendation The District should update and enforce procurement policies and procedures to fully comply with 2 CFR 200.318–200.327. These procedures must include documented competitive procurement processes, appropriate documentation retention, sole source justification protocols, and mandatory screening of vendors through SAM.gov. Written standards of conduct should be maintained and enforced to prevent conflicts of interest. Additionally, all staff involved in procurement should receive comprehensive training on federal procurement requirements and internal control responsibilities. The District should also implement a monitoring process to ensure ongoing compliance with these requirements. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions Two new policies will be implemented; a board policy to cover board approvals for the bidding of large projects and an internal policy and procedure which spells out additional requirements, like requiring three written bids for large purchases. In addition, all members of the Board of Directors and senior leadership team will sign Conflict of Interest statements on an annual basis to confirm that they do not have any potential conflicts that could impact purchasing decisions.
2024-002 Procurement Federal Agency U.S. Department of the Treasury Federal Assistance Listing Numbers 21.027 – Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Criteria [ X ] Compliance Finding [ ] Significant Deficiency [ X ] Material Weakness Entities receiving federal awards must have and follow documented procurement policies. Title 2 CFR 200.320 outlines acceptable methods of procurement and establishes applicable threshold requirements. Condition During our review of federally funded purchases, we noted several instances where procurement transactions were not conducted in accordance with these federal guidelines. For purchases falling between the micro-purchase threshold and the simplified acquisition threshold, the District did not retain documentation to demonstrate that price quotations were obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. Additionally, for purchases exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the District was unable to provide documentation showing that the required number of bids were solicited. In one instance, a sole source acquisition was made without sufficient written justification, as required by 2 CFR 200.320(c), which permits noncompetitive procurement only under specific and well-documented circumstances. Furthermore, the District could not provide documentation verifying that vendors were screened against the federal System for Award Management (SAM.gov) to confirm that they were not suspended or debarred from participating in federal programs. Lastly, the District could not demonstrate that it performed conflict of interest checks to ensure that employees or officers participated in the selection, award or administration of a contract where conflicts of interest exist. This finding appears to be a systemic problem. Cause The District’s procurement policy was not compared with the federal regulations when it was developed. Management did not follow its established procurement policy and documentation was not maintained evidencing its compliance with the policy. Effect Noncompliance with federal procurement requirements increases the risk of unallowable costs, noncompetitive vendor selection, and potential questioned costs. This could result in financial penalties or the need to return federal funds. The absence of conflict of interest checks also exposes the District to the risk of biased procurement decisions and compromised integrity. Recommendation The District should update and enforce procurement policies and procedures to fully comply with 2 CFR 200.318–200.327. These procedures must include documented competitive procurement processes, appropriate documentation retention, sole source justification protocols, and mandatory screening of vendors through SAM.gov. Written standards of conduct should be maintained and enforced to prevent conflicts of interest. Additionally, all staff involved in procurement should receive comprehensive training on federal procurement requirements and internal control responsibilities. The District should also implement a monitoring process to ensure ongoing compliance with these requirements. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions Two new policies will be implemented; a board policy to cover board approvals for the bidding of large projects and an internal policy and procedure which spells out additional requirements, like requiring three written bids for large purchases. In addition, all members of the Board of Directors and senior leadership team will sign Conflict of Interest statements on an annual basis to confirm that they do not have any potential conflicts that could impact purchasing decisions.
Department of Treasury, State of Iowa Department of Management, Federal Financial Assistance Listing 21.029, 526659 Coronavirus Capital Projects Fund Procurement, Suspension & Debarment Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Material Noncompliance Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303(a) establishes that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides assurance that the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. 2 CFR 200.318 maintains that recipients must have and use documented procurement policies and must conform procurement standards in sections 200.317 through 200.327. 2 CFR 200 Appendix II requires certain provisions be included in contracts if criteria are applicable. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.214 requires recipients to restrict the subawards and contract with certain parities that are debarred, suspended, or excluded from ineligible participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. Condition: Testing of the federal program identified the following: • The Cooperative’s formally documented procurement policy was missing one required element as it relates to the methods of procurement. • One instance where the Cooperative followed a bid process, however, the documentation was not retained to support the selection. Additionally, the contract with the vendor was missing required contract provisions in accordance with Uniform Guidance. • One instance where the Cooperative did not follow the procurement process as detailed in the procurement policy and did not have any formal documentation or contract in place with the vendor. • Two instances where the Cooperative entered into a contract with a vendor over $25,000 and there was no review performed to ensure the vendor was not suspended or debarred. Cause: Contract provisions were not evaluated compared to Uniform Guidance contract requirements. Contracts entered were not evaluated in accordance with Uniform Guidance as it relates to suspension and debarment. Effect: Ineffective controls over this are of compliance could result in a reasonable possibility the Cooperative would be noncompliant with the compliance requirements outlined above. Additionally, the cooperative may enter into a covered transaction with a vendor that is suspended or debarred. Questioned Costs: None reported. Context/Sampling: A nonstatistical sample of 2 out of 4 vendors were selected for testing. Repeat Finding form Prior Year: No Recommendation: We recommend the Cooperative update their procurement policy to ensure it includes the required elements as it relates to the methods of procurement. In addition, we suggest that management implement procedures and control processes related to the review of contracts to ensure the procurement methods are being followed as it relates to covered transactions and those contracts include the required Uniform Guidance provisions. Also, management should ensure vendors are not suspended or debarred from doing business with the federal government. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding.
Finding 2024-002: 10.761 - U.S. Department of Agriculture - Water and Waste Technical Assistance and Training - Material Weakness Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Criteria: Per Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CPR) Part 200, Subpart D, section 200.318(i), the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement and suspension and debarment. Condition: During our testing of internal controls over compliance related to procurement and suspension and debarment, we identified vendors/ contractors that were awarded without required procurement and suspension and debarment documentation. Although there was no documentation to support this verification being performed prior to the payment, we noted that the vendors/contractors were not suspended or debarred. Questioned Costs: None. Cause: EWB-USA did not have adequate controls in place to ensure compliance with applicable federal requirements. Effect: EWB-USA was not in compliance with the procurement and suspension and debarment provisions as prescribed in the CFR. Recommendation: We recommend that EWB-USA implement procedures and controls to ensure that the approval of contractors or vendors are adequately supported by sufficient documentation and detail. In addition, this documentation should be retained, at a minimum, through the completion of the contract. Response: 1. Develop procurement procedures for procurement transactions under Federal awards or subawards, including verification that a potential subrecipient is not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from receiving Federal funds. 2. Provide training to relevant staff on the new procedures for procurement transactions including the verification of suspension and debarment for any subrecipient awards and the importance of compliance with federal regulations.
Finding 2024-002: 10.761 - U.S. Department of Agriculture - Water and Waste Technical Assistance and Training - Material Weakness Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Criteria: Per Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CPR) Part 200, Subpart D, section 200.318(i), the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement and suspension and debarment. Condition: During our testing of internal controls over compliance related to procurement and suspension and debarment, we identified vendors/ contractors that were awarded without required procurement and suspension and debarment documentation. Although there was no documentation to support this verification being performed prior to the payment, we noted that the vendors/contractors were not suspended or debarred. Questioned Costs: None. Cause: EWB-USA did not have adequate controls in place to ensure compliance with applicable federal requirements. Effect: EWB-USA was not in compliance with the procurement and suspension and debarment provisions as prescribed in the CFR. Recommendation: We recommend that EWB-USA implement procedures and controls to ensure that the approval of contractors or vendors are adequately supported by sufficient documentation and detail. In addition, this documentation should be retained, at a minimum, through the completion of the contract. Response: 1. Develop procurement procedures for procurement transactions under Federal awards or subawards, including verification that a potential subrecipient is not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from receiving Federal funds. 2. Provide training to relevant staff on the new procedures for procurement transactions including the verification of suspension and debarment for any subrecipient awards and the importance of compliance with federal regulations.
2024-005 - Lack of Written Federal Policies and Procedures Required by Uniform Guidance Finding Type: Material weakness in internal control over compliance Federal Program: 21.027 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles, Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Condition/Finding: The Village has not developed or implemented the written policies and procedures required under the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Required documentation is absent in areas such as internal controls over compliance, cash management, procurement, and allowable costs. Criteria: Per 2 CFR §200.303 and related sections (including §§200.305 and 200.318–320), non-federal entities expending federal awards must establish and maintain effective internal controls and must document policies and procedures governing compliance with applicable federal statutes, regulations, and terms of award. Cause: The Village has not formally developed Uniform Guidance-compliant policies due to limited administrative resources and competing operational priorities. Effect: The absence of formal written policies and procedures increases the risk of inconsistent or noncompliant treatment of federal expenditures. Without documented controls and expectations, the Village may fail to detect or prevent noncompliance with federal requirements in key grant administration areas. Recommendation: We recommend that the Village adopt written policies and procedures addressing the specific requirements outlined in the Uniform Guidance. These policies should include, but not be limited to, internal controls over compliance, procurement, cash management, subrecipient monitoring (if applicable), and allowable cost determinations. Management should ensure that these policies are communicated and periodically reviewed. View of Responsible Officials: Management’s response and planned corrective action can be found in the accompanying Corrective Action Plan.
FINDING 2024-002 Subject: Water and Waste Disposal Systems for Rural Communities - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Program: Water and Waste Disposal Systems for Rural Communities Assistance Listings Number: 10.760 Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): BAN-2 Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context As part of sound management of the federal award, the City was responsible for implementing a system of internal controls that would ensure compliance with the applicable requirements. The City had not properly designed or implemented such a system, which would include appropriate segregation of duties, that would likely be effective in preventing, or detecting and correcting, noncompliance. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 16 CITY OF HUNTINGBURG SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000 unless a lower, more restrictive threshold is set by a nonfederal entity. As Indiana Code has set a more restrictive threshold of $150,000, informal procurement methods are permitted when the value of the procurement does not exceed $150,000. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds, micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micropurchase threshold but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. Procurement - Simplified Acquisition During the audit period, the City had two vendors with purchases over the $150,000 threshold that were considered simplified acquisition procurements. Both vendors were tested. For one vendor, the City could not provide the procurement history or the rationale for the method of procurement, the selection of vendor, or the basis for price. The total amount spent with this vendor was $2,391,895. Procurement - Policy The City provided its purchasing policy for review, but it did not include the applicable federal regulations, such as procedures to avoid the acquisition of unnecessary or duplicative items and procedures to ensure that all solicitations incorporate a clear and accurate description of the technical requirements for the material, product, or service to be procured. Additionally, the City did not maintain written standards of conduct covering conflicts of interest and governing actions of its employees engaged in the selection, award, and administration of contracts. Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with, recipients are required to verify that such contracts and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the Excluded Parties List System (EPLS), collecting a certification from that person, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. A population of four covered transactions for goods or services were paid from USDA award funds during the audit period. A sample of two vendors were selected for testing. Of the two vendors tested, one vendor was not verified to not be suspended nor debarred or otherwise excluded or disqualified from participating in federal assistance programs or activities. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were isolated to the same single vendor for both the simplified acquisition and the suspension and debarment issues as noted above. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 17 CITY OF HUNTINGBURG SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318 states in part: "(a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. . . . (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. . . ." 2 CFR 200.320(b) states in part: "Formal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal financial assistance awards exceeds the SAT, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require following documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a non-competitive procurement can be used in accordance with § 200.319 or paragraph (c) of this section. The following formal methods of procurement are used for procurement of property or services above the simplified acquisition threshold or a value below the simplified acquisition threshold the non-Federal entity determines to be appropriate: (1) Sealed bids. A procurement method in which bids are publicly solicited and a firm fixed-price contract (lump sum or unit price) is awarded to the responsible bidder whose bid, conforming with all the material terms and conditions of the invitation for bids, is the lowest in price. . . . (2) Proposals. A procurement method in which either a fixed price or cost-reimbursement type contract is awarded. Proposals are generally used when conditions are not appropriate for the use of sealed bids. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 18 CITY OF HUNTINGBURG SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Cause The vendor in question was an engineering firm that the City originally hired to do a study at $40,000 in 2018 related to the wastewater treatment plant project. Through the years, the City did amendments to the contract to include more engineering services and did not advertise for bids or verify that the engineering firm was not suspended or debarred from receiving federal funds. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the City cannot ensure that the services obtained provided full and open competition or the basis of the price. In addition, the City cannot ensure the vendors paid were eligible to participate in federal programs. Any program funds the City used to pay vendors that have been suspended or debarred would be unallowable, and the funding agency could potentially recover them. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the City. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the City's management establish a proper system of internal controls to ensure expenditures made from federal awards use the appropriate procurement method and retain the documentation to support the procurement methods used in order to ensure compliance with the terms and conditions of the federal award. We recommended that management of the City establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure contractors and subrecipients, as appropriate, are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded prior to entering into contracts or subawards. We also recommended strengthening its policies and procedures to ensure appropriate supporting documentation for federal programs is retained to be presented for audit. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
The Town received and spent federal grant funds during the year ended December 31, 2024. Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) § 200.318 requires the Town to establish, in writing, procurement standards for use in the Town’s procurement (purchases) over federal grant expenditures.
U.S. Department of Agriculture Passed through the Alabama State Department of Education Program: Summer Food Service Program CFDA: 10.559 Grant Number: AF6-0000 Noncompliance/Significant Deficiency Procurement Criteria Per 2 CFR 200.318-200.326, non-federal entities must follow federal procurement standards when acquiring goods and services, including adherence to competition requirements and proper documentation. Condition During our audit of procurement activities, we identified purchases made from two food vendors that exceeded the micro-purchase threshold of $10,000. There was no evidence that the entity obtained price comparisons or quotations from other sources prior to selecting these vendors. Each vendor was used repeatedly throughout the year, and the cumulative totals were $38,998. Cause Staff believed that long-standing relationships with vendors or prior approvals were sufficient and did not realize that federal procurement rules still apply annually. Effect Failure to follow small purchase procedures increases the risk of overpaying for goods and may affect allowability of expenditures charged to the program. Recommendation We recommend the entity train staff on federal procurement guidelines. Purchases from vendors should be forecasted at the beginning of each grant period. Procurement guidelines should be followed for all vendors from which it is reasonably foreseeable that total purchases will exceed $10,000. Documentation should be maintained for all price quotations and comparisons reviewed prior to purchases for items exceeding the micro-purchase threshold. Management's Response Management acknowledges the importance of adhering to federal procurement standards, including the requirement for competitive pricing and documentation for purchases exceeding the micro-purchase threshold
FINDING 2024-004 Subject: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Federal Program: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listings Number: 21.027 Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): FY2024 Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2023-005. Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not in place at the County to ensure compliance with the requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Procurement The County had not established a purchasing policy that would reflect applicable state laws and regulations, including procedures to avoid acquisition of unnecessary or duplicative items; procedures to ensure that all solicitations incorporate a clear and accurate description of the technical requirements for the material, product, or service to be procured; and did not maintain written standards of conduct covering conflicts of interest and governing actions of its employees engaged in the selection, award, and administration of contracts. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 20 SHELBY COUNTY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with COVID-19 - State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF) award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the Excluded Parties List System (EPLS), collecting a certification from that person, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. The County did not have internal controls in place to ensure compliance with the suspension and debarment compliance requirement. Upon inquiry of the County's policies and procedures related to suspension and debarment requirements, the County stated that they did not have policies or procedures in place for verifying that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded or disqualified from participating in federal assistance programs or activities. Two covered transactions for goods or services that equaled or exceeded $25,000 that were paid from SLFRF funds during the audit period were identified. Each transaction was examined to determine whether the County verified the suspension and debarment status of either vendor prior to payment. The two covered transactions, totaling $95,122, did not include the appropriate provisions in the contracts nor did the County require a certification or check the EPLS to ensure the entity was not suspended or debarred prior to making payment. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(a) states: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non- Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 21 SHELBY COUNTY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 2 CFR 200.214 states: "Recipients and subrecipients are subject to the nonprocurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, as well as 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict making Federal awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from receiving or participating in Federal awards." 31 CFR 19.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the EPLS; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person if allowed by this rule; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the County. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the County's management of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, vendors and subrecipients to whom payments equal to or in excess of $25,000 were not verified to be not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. Any program funds the County used to pay vendors that have been suspended or debarred would be unallowable, and the funding agency could potentially recover them. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the County establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure contractors and subrecipients, as appropriate, are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded prior to entering into any contracts or subawards. Additionally, we recommended the County establish documented procurement procedures consistent with state and local laws for the acquisition of property or services required under a federal award or subaward. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
U.S. Department of Treasury Passed through State of South Dakota Board of Water and Natural Resources Federal Financial Assistance Listing 21.027 Federal Award Number SLFRP5319 Federal Award Year 2021 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Procurement Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Noncompliance Criteria: Non-federal entities other than states must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.327, which include having documented procedures for procurement transactions and written standards of conduct covering conflicts of interest and governing the actions of its employees engaged in the selection, award, and administration of contracts. Condition: The City does not have a formal documented procurement policy which includes written standards of conduct covering conflicts of interest and governing the actions of its employees engaged in the selection, award, and administration of contracts with federal funds. Cause: The City has not formalized their practiced procurement policy and conflict of interest standards into a formal written document. Effect: This condition increases the risk of that federal procurement requirements and conflict of interest standards are not adequately communicated to and understood by employees engaged in the selection, award, and administration of contracts, which increases the risk of procurements under federal awards being made not in compliance with federal regulations or other procurement requirements specific to an award. Context/Sampling: No sampling used. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): No Recommendation: We recommend management formally document their procurement policy, ensuring that all required procurement standards within 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.327 are addressed. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding.
FINDING 2024-001 Subject: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Federal Program: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listings Number: 21.027 Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): 2021 Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediate prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2023-001. Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not designed or implemented at the City to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Procurement Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is customarily set at $250,000. However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold of $150,000 or less for when small purchase procedures may be used. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. Micro-purchases are typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures are for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. One vendor was identified that fell within the small purchase threshold. Purchases from the vendor totaled $40,458. As such, price or rate quotations from an adequate number of qualified sources should have been obtained. However, the City did not obtain price or rate quotations for the purchases, nor was full and open competition provided for the vendor. Additionally, there was no documentation available to support the rationale to limit competition. Suspension and Debarment The City elected to receive the standard revenue loss allowance, allowing the City to claim $10,000,000 of its total COVID-19 - State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF) allocation of $16,549,045 as revenue loss to use for government services. The U.S. Department of the Treasury (Treasury) determined that there are no subawards under this eligible use category, and that recipients' use of revenue loss funds would not give rise to subrecipient relationships given that there is no federal program or purpose to carry out in the case of the revenue loss portion of the award. Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with SLFRF award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the Excluded Parties List System (EPLS), collecting a certification from that person, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person or entity. Due to the Treasury's determination that the revenue loss eligible use category does not give rise to subawards, the City was only required to comply with suspension and debarment requirements related to contracts. The City's policies related to SLFRF suspension and debarment requirements include the Board of Public Works completing a review of each bid packet to ensure the bidder submitted a statement indicating if they were not suspended or debarred or an employee from the City Controller's office checking the Sam.gov website. There were 13 covered transactions identified that equaled or exceeded $25,000, and 2 covered transactions, totaling $251,334, were selected for testing. For both of the transactions tested, the City did not verify the suspension or debarment status prior to payment. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 31 CFR 19.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the EPLS; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person if allowed by this rule; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." 2 CFR 200.318(a) states: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The nonfederal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases– (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." Cause The City did not follow the City's established policy to ensure the proper procurement of services and supplies and to verify suspension and debarment status for covered transactions. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. The City did not use the proper method of procurement to choose a vendor. In addition, the City did not ensure the contractors paid with federal funds are eligible to participate in federal programs. Any program funds the City used to pay contractors that have been suspended or debarred would be unallowable, and the funding agency could potentially recover them. Furthermore, noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the City. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the City follow the City's established policies to ensure compliance with requirements related to procurement and suspension and debarment. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-002 Subject: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Federal Program: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listings Number: 21.027 Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): TRSW222046 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Finance Authority Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not designed or implemented at the City to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Procurement Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is customarily set at $250,000. However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold of $150,000 or less for when small purchase procedures may be used. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. Micro-purchases are typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures are for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. The grant covered one project with one vendor that fell within the simplified acquisition threshold. Payments to the vendor for the project totaled $189,741 with $120,452 of that amount was grant funds. As such, the formal bid process should have been followed. The City did not perform bid procedures or provide the rationale for the method of procurement, the selection of vendor, or the basis for price. Additionally, the City did not obtain a written contract for the services. Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with federal award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the SAM exclusions, collecting a certification from that person, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person or entity. The City's policies related to COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds suspension and debarment requirements include the Board of Public Works completing a review of each bid packet to ensure the bidder submitted a statement indicating if they were not suspended or debarred or an employee from the City Controller's office checking the Sam.gov website. As noted above, the grant covered one project with one vendor utilized and the City did not verify the suspension or debarment status prior to payment for this vendor. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance was isolated to the instance noted above. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(a) states: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The nonfederal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (b) Formal Procurement Methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal financial assistance award exceeds the SAT, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require following documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a non-competitive procurement can be used in accordance with § 200.319 or paragraph (c) of this section. The following formal methods of procurement are used for procurement of property or services above the simplified acquisition threshold or a value below the simplified acquisition threshold the non-Federal entity determines to be appropriate: (1) Sealed bids. A procurement method in which bids are publicly solicited and a firm fixed-price contract (lump sum or unit price) is awarded to the responsible bidder whose bid, conforming with all the material terms and conditions of the invitation for bids, is the lowest in price. The sealed bids method is the preferred method for procuring construction, if the conditions. . . . (2) Proposals. A procurement method in which either a fixed price or cost-reimbursement type contract is awarded. Proposals are generally used when conditions are not appropriate for the use of sealed bids. . . ." 31 CFR 19.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the EPLS; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person if allowed by this rule; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause The City did not follow the City's established policy to ensure the proper procurement of services and supplies and to verify suspension and debarment status for covered transactions. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. The City did not use the proper method of procurement to choose a vendor. In addition, the City did not ensure the contractors paid with federal funds are eligible to participate in federal programs. Any program funds the City used to pay contractors that have been suspended or debarred would be unallowable, and the funding agency could potentially recover them. Furthermore, noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the City. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the City follow its established policies to ensure compliance with requirements related to procurement and suspension and debarment. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
Criteria or Specific Requirement (Including Statutory, Regulatory or Other Citation): 2 CFR 200.303 requires that the non-Federal entity must “(a) establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States and the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).” 2 CFR 200.318 (i) General Procurement Standards states, “the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price.” Condition: Methodist did not maintain records for procurements sufficient to detail the history of procurement, including the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Cause: Methodist did not have effective internal controls and procedures in place to ensure Methodist maintained records for procurements sufficient to detail the history of procurement, including the rationale for the method of procurement and other required elements. Effect or Potential Effect: Methodist did not comply with the general procurement standards and methods of procurement to be followed per the Uniform Guidance to maintain sufficient detail of the history of the procurement, including the rationale of the method of procurement. Questioned Costs: $12,807 Context: EY selected and tested 10 procurements over $10,000 with expenditures totaling $182,415 from a population of $1,289,446 procurements over $10,000 during the year ended December 31, 2024. Of the 10 expenditures selected for testing 1 procurement totaling $12,807 did not have evidence of sole source justification Identification as a Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: Methodist should retain written documentation for procurements, documenting the history of the procurement prior to the procurement of goods or services including, but not limited to, the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Views of Responsible Officials: Methodist recognizes the current gap between Supply Chain Services and the Research Institute related to retaining documents for procurement activities. Supply Chain Services will develop processes to retain written documentation for procurement activities in accordance with regulatory standards. As Methodist is in transition to a new ERP system in Quarter 1, 2026, Supply Chain Services will include strategies to address the needs in both the short term and long term.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Assistance Listing Numbers: 21.027 & 93.623 Federal Program Titles: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds; Basic Center Grant Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria or specific requirement: The Code of Federal Regulations 2 CFR 200.318, General procurement standards, requires that non-Federal entities must have documented procurement procedures, consistent with State and local laws and regulations for the acquisition of property or services required under a federal award and subaward. The non-Federal entity’s documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in 2 CFR 200.318 through 200.326. Condition: During our testing, we noted that the Organization’s procurement policy did not address all of the identified requirements in 2 CFR 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned Costs: None. Context: In our review of the current procurement policy, The Adams Group, LLC noted the following: • The policy did not include documented procedures for purchases above the simplified acquisition threshold ($250,000) in accordance with 2 CFR 200.320b. • The policy did not include documented procedures for the use and instances of noncompetitive procurement in accordance with 2 CFR 200.320c. • The policy did not include documented procedures for verifying that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.212 and 200.318. • We also noted that the Organization did not verify that the entities with which it entered into contracts were not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded. Effect: The Organization’s procurement policy is not in compliance with general procurement standards, and proper verification procedures for potentially suspended or debarred entities were not performed. Repeat Finding: This is a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization update their procurement policy to address all requirements identified in 2 CFR 200.318 through 200.326. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Assistance Listing Numbers: 21.027 & 93.623 Federal Program Titles: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds; Basic Center Grant Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria or specific requirement: The Code of Federal Regulations 2 CFR 200.318, General procurement standards, requires that non-Federal entities must have documented procurement procedures, consistent with State and local laws and regulations for the acquisition of property or services required under a federal award and subaward. The non-Federal entity’s documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in 2 CFR 200.318 through 200.326. Condition: During our testing, we noted that the Organization’s procurement policy did not address all of the identified requirements in 2 CFR 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned Costs: None. Context: In our review of the current procurement policy, The Adams Group, LLC noted the following: • The policy did not include documented procedures for purchases above the simplified acquisition threshold ($250,000) in accordance with 2 CFR 200.320b. • The policy did not include documented procedures for the use and instances of noncompetitive procurement in accordance with 2 CFR 200.320c. • The policy did not include documented procedures for verifying that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.212 and 200.318. • We also noted that the Organization did not verify that the entities with which it entered into contracts were not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded. Effect: The Organization’s procurement policy is not in compliance with general procurement standards, and proper verification procedures for potentially suspended or debarred entities were not performed. Repeat Finding: This is a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization update their procurement policy to address all requirements identified in 2 CFR 200.318 through 200.326. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding.
Department of Treasury Federal Financial Assistance Listing No. 21.027 COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Immaterial Instance of Noncompliance Criteria – Uniform Guidance and 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 set forth the procurement standards non-federal entities other than states must follow when operating federal programs and the procurement procedures required. Condition – In our testing of procurement, suspension and debarment it was identified that the City did not have a written policy on procurement that satisfied the requirements of 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Cause – Lack of oversight, awareness, or understanding of all of the specific requirements under the Uniform Guidance and applicable CFR sections and controls were not adequately designed to ensure compliance with all of these requirements. Effect – A lack of documented policies increase the overall risk that employees are not aware of the specific requirements with contracting and awarding contracts to lower tier entities. Questioned Costs – None reported Context/Sampling – All vendors, which totaled one, were selected for procurement testing. Repeat Finding from Prior Years – Yes Recommendation – Management should establish a written policy that addresses all of the procurement requirements for federal programs as identified in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 and maintain adequate supporting documentation and records to document history and methods of procurement and the procedures performed to comply with these CFR sections. View of responsible officials – Management is in agreement with the finding.
Finding 2024-003: Material Weakness - Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Federal Program: Water and Waste Disposal Systems for Rural Communities Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Assistance Listing Number: 10.760 Criteria: For federal awards after January 1, 2018, guidance provided in 2 CFR part 200.318 requires non-federal entities to establish and follow their own documented procurement procedures that conform to applicable federal law and standards. 2 CFR part 200.320 includes different allowable methods of procurement. There are also requirements to verify the vendors are not suspended or debarred. Condition/Context: During testing for this program, one of two vendors tested did not go through the appropriate procurement process. The vendor was directly awarded the project. The City did not have documentation of ensuring either of the vendors selected for testing were not suspended or debarred before entering in to covered transactions. The sample was not a statistically valid sample. Cause: The City has not historically bid out their engineering services and has used the same vendor for all projects. Due to turnover, the City did not have documentation of the search for suspension or debarment of the vendors. Effect: The City could potentially not have selected an appropriate vendor for the project or vendors could be used who are not eligible to be paid with federal funds. Questioned Costs: None noted. Recommendation: The City should ensure contracts are following the procurement process for selection of vendors for federally funded projects. Program personnel should become familiar with the procurement, suspension and debarment rules for federal programs and implement process changes for future projects and retain documentation of such verifications. Views of Responsible Officials: The City of Rhinelander has had turnover in the mayor, city administrator and public works director positions in recent years. The City will be reviewing its procurement policy to define clearer expectations for the administrative staff to follow.
2024-004: Written Policies and Procedures – Significant Deficiency Criteria and Condition: 2 CFR 200.302 requires that the recipient or subrecipient’s financial management system must provide written procedures to implement the requirements of 2 CFR 200.305 (Federal payments) and for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with subpart E and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.318 requires that the recipient or subrecipient must maintain and use documented procedures for procurement transactions under a Federal award or subaward, including for acquisition of property or services. Context: Although the Organization follows procedures that minimize the time between reimbursement of dollars and expenditure (2 CFR 200.305), verify payments made are in accordance with subpart E and terms and conditions of the award, and follow procurement standards for vendors, there are no written procedures as required by the CFR. Cause and Effect: The Organization did not maintain written procedures as required by the CFR. Questioned Costs: This finding does not result in questioned costs. Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization formally document the current policies and procedures in place to meet documentation requirements of the CFR. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: We will adopt formal policies and procedures that document our current practices and also meet the requirements of the CFR.
2024-004: Written Policies and Procedures – Significant Deficiency Criteria and Condition: 2 CFR 200.302 requires that the recipient or subrecipient’s financial management system must provide written procedures to implement the requirements of 2 CFR 200.305 (Federal payments) and for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with subpart E and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.318 requires that the recipient or subrecipient must maintain and use documented procedures for procurement transactions under a Federal award or subaward, including for acquisition of property or services. Context: Although the Organization follows procedures that minimize the time between reimbursement of dollars and expenditure (2 CFR 200.305), verify payments made are in accordance with subpart E and terms and conditions of the award, and follow procurement standards for vendors, there are no written procedures as required by the CFR. Cause and Effect: The Organization did not maintain written procedures as required by the CFR. Questioned Costs: This finding does not result in questioned costs. Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization formally document the current policies and procedures in place to meet documentation requirements of the CFR. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: We will adopt formal policies and procedures that document our current practices and also meet the requirements of the CFR.
Finding 2024-003 Material weakness in internal control over compliance with procurement procedures meeting the requirements of 2 CFR Part 200. Federal Agency: Department of Health and Human Services Program Titles: Community Funded Projects Assistance Listing Number: 93.493 Pass-Through Entity: N/A Award Numbers: H79FG001026 and H79FG001037 Award Periods: September 30, 2023 through September 29, 2024 Criteria Internal controls requirements contained in Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance) , Subpart D ‐ Post Federal Award Requirements, Section 200.318 through 200.326 Internal Controls, require that a non‐Federal entity use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. The procurement procedures must include the following: - Using the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). Under the micro-purchase method, the aggregate dollar amount does not exceed $10,000 ($2,000 in the case of acquisition for construction subject to the Wage Rate Requirements (Davis-Bacon Act)). Small purchase procedures are used for purchases that exceed the micro-purchase amount but do not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold ($250,000). Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive quotations if the nonfederal entity considers the price to be reasonable (2 CFR section 200.320(a)). If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources (2 CFR section 200.320(b)). - For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, using one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of the circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). - Using Noncompetitive procurement only if one or more of the following circumstances apply: · The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold; · The item is available only from a single source; · The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from publicizing a competitive solicitation; · The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity expressly authorizes a noncompetitive procurement in response to a written request from the nonfederal entity; or · After solicitation of a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate PDA’s procurement policy also requires a verification that vendors and sub-recipients are not suspended or debarred by checking the website of the System for Award Management and documentation of such verification maintained by the Finance Office. Condition/Context While PDA has established a procurement policy, it does not fully conform to Federal law and the Uniform Guidance for the following reasons: - Micro purchase threshold is not explicitly defined, although it is mentioned that cost and price analysis shall be made and documented in connection with every procurement action above $5,000. - The policy does not have clear provisions for maintaining detailed procurement records. Such records should include the rationale for the procurement method, the selection of contract type, the contractor selection or rejection process, and the basis for the contract price. - The simplified acquisition threshold is not defined and does not incorporate all relevant elements including sealed bids method. The total misstatement is the entire population amount $1,546,725 as PDA did not maintain sufficient documentation to evidence history of procurement for all procurements. Cause PDA’s procurement policy does not seem to have been reviewed against the Uniform Guidance for compliance. Internal controls over maintaining sufficient records to detail the history of procurement including noncompetitive justification and suspension and debarment verification were found to be insufficient. Effect The absence of a policy that fully conformed to the Uniform Guidance resulted in noncompliance issues such as records sufficient to detail the history of procurement transactions not maintained. Questioned Costs $1,546,725 Repeat Finding Yes Recommendation We recommend PDA implement measures to ensure that its procurement policy reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations conforming to applicable federal statutes and requirement in 2 CFR part 200. Management should ensure procurement transactions are documented in such detail to evidence the method of procurement use and vendor verification for suspension and debarment.
Finding 2024-003 Material weakness in internal control over compliance with procurement procedures meeting the requirements of 2 CFR Part 200. Federal Agency: Department of Health and Human Services Program Titles: Community Funded Projects Assistance Listing Number: 93.493 Pass-Through Entity: N/A Award Numbers: H79FG001026 and H79FG001037 Award Periods: September 30, 2023 through September 29, 2024 Criteria Internal controls requirements contained in Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance) , Subpart D ‐ Post Federal Award Requirements, Section 200.318 through 200.326 Internal Controls, require that a non‐Federal entity use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. The procurement procedures must include the following: - Using the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). Under the micro-purchase method, the aggregate dollar amount does not exceed $10,000 ($2,000 in the case of acquisition for construction subject to the Wage Rate Requirements (Davis-Bacon Act)). Small purchase procedures are used for purchases that exceed the micro-purchase amount but do not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold ($250,000). Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive quotations if the nonfederal entity considers the price to be reasonable (2 CFR section 200.320(a)). If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources (2 CFR section 200.320(b)). - For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, using one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of the circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). - Using Noncompetitive procurement only if one or more of the following circumstances apply: · The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold; · The item is available only from a single source; · The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from publicizing a competitive solicitation; · The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity expressly authorizes a noncompetitive procurement in response to a written request from the nonfederal entity; or · After solicitation of a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate PDA’s procurement policy also requires a verification that vendors and sub-recipients are not suspended or debarred by checking the website of the System for Award Management and documentation of such verification maintained by the Finance Office. Condition/Context While PDA has established a procurement policy, it does not fully conform to Federal law and the Uniform Guidance for the following reasons: - Micro purchase threshold is not explicitly defined, although it is mentioned that cost and price analysis shall be made and documented in connection with every procurement action above $5,000. - The policy does not have clear provisions for maintaining detailed procurement records. Such records should include the rationale for the procurement method, the selection of contract type, the contractor selection or rejection process, and the basis for the contract price. - The simplified acquisition threshold is not defined and does not incorporate all relevant elements including sealed bids method. The total misstatement is the entire population amount $1,546,725 as PDA did not maintain sufficient documentation to evidence history of procurement for all procurements. Cause PDA’s procurement policy does not seem to have been reviewed against the Uniform Guidance for compliance. Internal controls over maintaining sufficient records to detail the history of procurement including noncompetitive justification and suspension and debarment verification were found to be insufficient. Effect The absence of a policy that fully conformed to the Uniform Guidance resulted in noncompliance issues such as records sufficient to detail the history of procurement transactions not maintained. Questioned Costs $1,546,725 Repeat Finding Yes Recommendation We recommend PDA implement measures to ensure that its procurement policy reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations conforming to applicable federal statutes and requirement in 2 CFR part 200. Management should ensure procurement transactions are documented in such detail to evidence the method of procurement use and vendor verification for suspension and debarment.
Finding Number: 2024-001 Finding Type: Federal award finding Federal Assistance Listing No.: 15.685 Program Name: National Fish Passage Federal Agency: U.S. Department of the Interior Federal Grant Number: F24C01411-00 Federal Award Year: 2024 Pass-through entity: Rogue River Watershed Council Grant Number: 205 Control Deficiency Type: Significant deficiency in internal controls and instances of non-compliance Instances of Noncompliance: Yes Compliance Requirement: Procurement, suspension and debarment Questioned Costs: None Repeat Finding: No Criteria: A non-federal organization must follow its own documented procurement procedures, provided they comply with applicable state and local laws and align with the federal standards outlined in 2 CFR 200.318–200.327 (“Uniform Guidance”). Specifically, 2 CFR 200.318(i) requires entities to maintain records sufficient to detail the history of the procurement, including but not limited to the rationale for the procurement method chosen, the basis for selecting or rejecting contractors, and the justification for the contract price. In addition, all procurement transactions must be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition. Furthermore, federal requirements prohibit grant recipients from contracting with, or purchasing from, contractors who are suspended and debarred from doing business with the federal government. Whenever the organization enters into contracts or purchases goods or services with federal funds that it expects to equal or exceed $25,000, it must verify that the contractor or vendor has not been suspended, debarred or otherwise excluded. Finally, the organization must ensure that all federal programs comply with Section 70914 of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for infrastructure projects. Condition: The organization has enacted a written procurement policy and management believed that it met all the standards required under 2 CFR 200.318 through 200.326. However, the policy failed to include some of the most stringent requirements included in the Uniform Guidance, and the organization did not comply with all the documentation requirements laid out in its procurement policy. More specifically, the organization did not maintain written thorough documentation of the procurement process as stated in 2 CFR 200.318(i), nor publicized the request for proposal in accordance with 2 CFR 200.319. Finally, the contract funded under the major program did not incorporate the mandatory BABA Act compliance language. Cause: As this was the entity’s first federal audit, WaterWatch was unaware of some procurement requirements outlined in the Uniform Guidance that needed to be incorporated into its procurement policies and procedures. Furthermore, the entity was new to the federal procurement environment. Regarding suspension and debarment, and the BABA Act, the organization was generally aware of these requirements and believed it had achieved compliance. However, WaterWatch was not aware of the need to perform documented formal verification regarding debarment beyond regularly sharing information in their existing networks of restoration agency and NGOs which rely on the same pool of experience contractors. Regarding BABA, WaterWatch was not aware of the specific documentation requirements. WaterWatch did not add the required contract language regarding BABA or debarment. In addition, due to the limited number of contractors performing this type of work, only four contractors responded to this particular request for proposal and only one submitted a bid. As a result, WaterWatch did not generate their comparison-based procurement process written documentation. Effect: The organization did not comply with some of the procurement, suspension and debarment requirement as outline in the Uniform Guidance. Audit Recommendation: We recommend that management review its current procurement policy to ensure that all procurement activities fully comply with the federal regulations, as well as establish additional procedure and oversight mechanism to ensure that procurement activities fully comply with the organization’s policies. Management’s Response: The following corrective actions are being immediately implemented for contracts in WaterWatch’s restoration program in order to achieve compliance: 1. Language requiring all contractors to comply with the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act is added to all new WaterWatch contracts and all current contracts via amendment. 2. Language requiring all contractors to comply with federal suspension and debarment contracting standards is added to all new WaterWatch contracts and all current contracts via amendment. 3. WaterWatch will keep formal documentation of debarment searches for all contractors. 4. WaterWatch will keep formal documentation of contractor procurement process in both Southern Oregon and Portland offices.
Finding Number: 2024-001 Finding Type: Federal award finding Federal Assistance Listing No.: 15.685 Program Name: National Fish Passage Federal Agency: U.S. Department of the Interior Federal Grant Number: F24C01411-00 Federal Award Year: 2024 Pass-through entity: Rogue River Watershed Council Grant Number: 205 Control Deficiency Type: Significant deficiency in internal controls and instances of non-compliance Instances of Noncompliance: Yes Compliance Requirement: Procurement, suspension and debarment Questioned Costs: None Repeat Finding: No Criteria: A non-federal organization must follow its own documented procurement procedures, provided they comply with applicable state and local laws and align with the federal standards outlined in 2 CFR 200.318–200.327 (“Uniform Guidance”). Specifically, 2 CFR 200.318(i) requires entities to maintain records sufficient to detail the history of the procurement, including but not limited to the rationale for the procurement method chosen, the basis for selecting or rejecting contractors, and the justification for the contract price. In addition, all procurement transactions must be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition. Furthermore, federal requirements prohibit grant recipients from contracting with, or purchasing from, contractors who are suspended and debarred from doing business with the federal government. Whenever the organization enters into contracts or purchases goods or services with federal funds that it expects to equal or exceed $25,000, it must verify that the contractor or vendor has not been suspended, debarred or otherwise excluded. Finally, the organization must ensure that all federal programs comply with Section 70914 of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for infrastructure projects. Condition: The organization has enacted a written procurement policy and management believed that it met all the standards required under 2 CFR 200.318 through 200.326. However, the policy failed to include some of the most stringent requirements included in the Uniform Guidance, and the organization did not comply with all the documentation requirements laid out in its procurement policy. More specifically, the organization did not maintain written thorough documentation of the procurement process as stated in 2 CFR 200.318(i), nor publicized the request for proposal in accordance with 2 CFR 200.319. Finally, the contract funded under the major program did not incorporate the mandatory BABA Act compliance language. Cause: As this was the entity’s first federal audit, WaterWatch was unaware of some procurement requirements outlined in the Uniform Guidance that needed to be incorporated into its procurement policies and procedures. Furthermore, the entity was new to the federal procurement environment. Regarding suspension and debarment, and the BABA Act, the organization was generally aware of these requirements and believed it had achieved compliance. However, WaterWatch was not aware of the need to perform documented formal verification regarding debarment beyond regularly sharing information in their existing networks of restoration agency and NGOs which rely on the same pool of experience contractors. Regarding BABA, WaterWatch was not aware of the specific documentation requirements. WaterWatch did not add the required contract language regarding BABA or debarment. In addition, due to the limited number of contractors performing this type of work, only four contractors responded to this particular request for proposal and only one submitted a bid. As a result, WaterWatch did not generate their comparison-based procurement process written documentation. Effect: The organization did not comply with some of the procurement, suspension and debarment requirement as outline in the Uniform Guidance. Audit Recommendation: We recommend that management review its current procurement policy to ensure that all procurement activities fully comply with the federal regulations, as well as establish additional procedure and oversight mechanism to ensure that procurement activities fully comply with the organization’s policies. Management’s Response: The following corrective actions are being immediately implemented for contracts in WaterWatch’s restoration program in order to achieve compliance: 1. Language requiring all contractors to comply with the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act is added to all new WaterWatch contracts and all current contracts via amendment. 2. Language requiring all contractors to comply with federal suspension and debarment contracting standards is added to all new WaterWatch contracts and all current contracts via amendment. 3. WaterWatch will keep formal documentation of debarment searches for all contractors. 4. WaterWatch will keep formal documentation of contractor procurement process in both Southern Oregon and Portland offices.
2024-005 Assistance Listing Number 66.468 Drinking Water State Revolving Fund United States Environmental Protection Agency North Dakota Public Finance Authority Procurement Suspension & Debarment 2 CFR Part 200.318 Criteria 2 CFR Part 200.318 states that a non-Federal entity must have and use documented procedures, consistent with state, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of 2 CFR part 200.317 through 200.327. Condition District does not have a written procurement policy in place. Cause The District has not approved a written procurement policy. Effect Non-compliance with Procurement Suspension & Debarment compliance requirements. Questioned Costs Not Applicable Repeat Finding See 2023-005. Recommendation We recommend for the board of the District to create and implement a procurement policy that adheres to state and local regulations as well as 2 CFR Part 200.317 through 200.327. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions The District will create and approve a procurement policy that adheres to state and local regulations as well as 2 CFR Part 200.317 through 200.327.
Finding 2024-003: Significant Deficiency - Internal Control Over Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Program Water and Waste Disposal Systems for Rural Communities Federal Agency U.S. Department of Agriculture Assistance Listing Number 10.760 Repeat of Prior Year Finding 2023-003 Criteria: For federal awards after January 1, 2018, guidance provided in 2 CFR part 200.318 requires nonfederal entities to establish and follow their own documented procurement procedures that conform to applicable federal law and standards. 2 CFR part 200.320 includes different allowable methods of procurement. There are also requirements to verify the vendors are not suspended or debarred. Condition/Context: During our testing for this program in the prior year, we noted that the City did not have a written procurement policy to conform with Uniform Guidance requirements. The City contracted with a third-party administrator who provided the services related to procurement for this grant program. No additional contracts were procured with federal funds in 2024. Cause: The City was made aware of the requirement of requiring a procurement policy but has not implemented a policy at this time. Effect: Without an adequate policy in place, procurement procedures may not adhere to requirements of federal awards. Questioned Costs: None noted. Recommendation: Program personnel should become familiar with the procurement, suspension and debarment rules for Federal programs and implement a formal written policy to conform with Uniform Guidance requirements. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding and will make efforts to implement a formal procurement policy.
Environmental Protection Agency, passed through State of North Dakota Department of Environmental Quality Federal Financial Assistance Listing #66.468 Capitalization Grants for Drinking Water Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance Criteria - Uniform Guidance and 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 set forth the procurement standards non-federal entities other than states must follow when operating federal programs and the procurement procedures required. Condition - During the course of our engagement, it was identified that the District did not have a written policy on procurement that satisfied the requirements of 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Cause - Lack of oversight, awareness, or understanding of all of the specific requirements under the Uniform Guidance and applicable CFR sections, and controls were not adequately designed to ensure compliance with all of these requirements. Effect - A lack of documented policies increase the overall risk that employees are not aware of the specific requirements with of procurement, suspension, and debarment. Questioned Costs – None reported Context/Sampling - Overall procurement policy. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s) – Yes, prior year finding 2023-006 Recommendation - We recommend that management establish a written policy that addresses all of the procurement requirements for federal programs as identified in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 and maintain adequate supporting documentation and records to document history and methods of procurement and the procedures performed to comply with these CFR sections. Views of Responsible Officials - There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
to align with the requirements of 2 CFR 200.318 and are expecting to be a low-risk auditee during the 2025 fiscal year.
Criteria or Specific Requirement Procurement: Part 2 CFR Section 200.318 requires that recipients and subrecipients maintain and use documented procedures for procurement transactions under federal awards and subawards, including for acquisition of property or services. It also requires that recipients and subrecipients maintain records sufficient to detail the history of each procurement transaction. These records must include the rationale for the procurement method, contract type selection, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract type. Suspension and Debarment: Part 2 CFR Section 180.300 describes federal requirements related to suspension and debarment for federal award recipients. The standards require that a federal award recipient verify that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not suspended and debarred. Procedures for satisfying such requirements should be documented, and evidence of such procedures should be maintained. Condition Procurement: The Organization has a documented procurement policy. However, we were unable to view records detailing the history of the Organization’s two procurement transactions and that steps required by the Organization’s procurement were completed for the transactions. Suspension and Debarment: We were unable to see evidence that the Organization verified two vendors with which it entered a covered transaction were not suspended and debarred before the date it entered the transaction with such vendors. During our audit procedures, we noted that the vendors were not suspended and debarred.Questioned Costs: None Context: Procurement: Two instances were noted during testing of eight transactions above the Organization’s micro purchase threshold. Suspension and Debarment: Two instances were noted during testing of two coveredtransactions. Cause: We were unable to view evidence that the Organization's documented procurement, and suspension and debarment policies were followed. Effect: The Organization is not in compliance with federal requirements related to documented procurement, and suspension and debarment procedures. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization document and maintain evidence of: its completion of the required steps of its procurement policy for applicable transactions, and suspension and debarment checks and procedures the Organization performs over vendors.Documentation and evidence of these procedures should be maintained to help show that the Organization in compliance with requirements specified in the Uniform Guidance. Views of responsible officials: Management partially agrees with this finding. Regarding suspension and debarment, CLS agrees on improving the documentation to comply and demonstrate compliance with this requirement, though CLS disagrees with the characterization of material weakness. Regarding the two procurement transactions, CLS disagrees strongly that these transactions were procurements subject to the CLS accounting manual procurement section. CLS provided documentation to the auditors demonstrating that these were not procurements but were, in fact, required by existing leases. In one instance, our Denver landlord required us to pay a “catch-up” payment for operating expenses it had underbilled us previously; this cannot conceivably have been a procurement as we did not have discretion not to pay it and it was required by an existing lease. The second instance was a payment related to the expansion of leased office space in Colorado Springs; that also was not a procurement as there was no alternative but to pay the existing landlord for increased space, and it could not conceivably have been conducive to third-party bidding etc. We understand that the auditors may prefer to have a sole source letter in these instances, but we disagree with any finding that this is required by our accounting manual and the auditors have pointed to no specific language in the accounting manual for this requirement. Auditor’s Concluding Remarks: Management’s response did not persuade the auditor to revise the finding. Part 2 CFR Section 200.318 requires that recipients and subrecipients maintain and use documented procedures for procurement transactions under federal awards and subawards, including for acquisition of property or services. It also requires that recipients and subrecipients maintain records sufficient to detail the history of each procurement transaction. These records must include the rationale for the procurement method, contract type selection, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract type. We were unable to see evidence of the federally required documentation. The Organization’s accounting manual states that leases of office buildings and office storage space and contracted services are considered procurements.
Criteria or Specific Requirement Procurement: Part 2 CFR Section 200.318 requires that recipients and subrecipients maintain and use documented procedures for procurement transactions under federal awards and subawards, including for acquisition of property or services. It also requires that recipients and subrecipients maintain records sufficient to detail the history of each procurement transaction. These records must include the rationale for the procurement method, contract type selection, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract type. Suspension and Debarment: Part 2 CFR Section 180.300 describes federal requirements related to suspension and debarment for federal award recipients. The standards require that a federal award recipient verify that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not suspended and debarred. Procedures for satisfying such requirements should be documented, and evidence of such procedures should be maintained. Condition Procurement: The Organization has a documented procurement policy. However, we were unable to view records detailing the history of the Organization’s two procurement transactions and that steps required by the Organization’s procurement were completed for the transactions. Suspension and Debarment: We were unable to see evidence that the Organization verified two vendors with which it entered a covered transaction were not suspended and debarred before the date it entered the transaction with such vendors. During our audit procedures, we noted that the vendors were not suspended and debarred.Questioned Costs: None Context: Procurement: Two instances were noted during testing of eight transactions above the Organization’s micro purchase threshold. Suspension and Debarment: Two instances were noted during testing of two coveredtransactions. Cause: We were unable to view evidence that the Organization's documented procurement, and suspension and debarment policies were followed. Effect: The Organization is not in compliance with federal requirements related to documented procurement, and suspension and debarment procedures. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization document and maintain evidence of: its completion of the required steps of its procurement policy for applicable transactions, and suspension and debarment checks and procedures the Organization performs over vendors.Documentation and evidence of these procedures should be maintained to help show that the Organization in compliance with requirements specified in the Uniform Guidance. Views of responsible officials: Management partially agrees with this finding. Regarding suspension and debarment, CLS agrees on improving the documentation to comply and demonstrate compliance with this requirement, though CLS disagrees with the characterization of material weakness. Regarding the two procurement transactions, CLS disagrees strongly that these transactions were procurements subject to the CLS accounting manual procurement section. CLS provided documentation to the auditors demonstrating that these were not procurements but were, in fact, required by existing leases. In one instance, our Denver landlord required us to pay a “catch-up” payment for operating expenses it had underbilled us previously; this cannot conceivably have been a procurement as we did not have discretion not to pay it and it was required by an existing lease. The second instance was a payment related to the expansion of leased office space in Colorado Springs; that also was not a procurement as there was no alternative but to pay the existing landlord for increased space, and it could not conceivably have been conducive to third-party bidding etc. We understand that the auditors may prefer to have a sole source letter in these instances, but we disagree with any finding that this is required by our accounting manual and the auditors have pointed to no specific language in the accounting manual for this requirement. Auditor’s Concluding Remarks: Management’s response did not persuade the auditor to revise the finding. Part 2 CFR Section 200.318 requires that recipients and subrecipients maintain and use documented procedures for procurement transactions under federal awards and subawards, including for acquisition of property or services. It also requires that recipients and subrecipients maintain records sufficient to detail the history of each procurement transaction. These records must include the rationale for the procurement method, contract type selection, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract type. We were unable to see evidence of the federally required documentation. The Organization’s accounting manual states that leases of office buildings and office storage space and contracted services are considered procurements.
Criteria or Specific Requirement Procurement: Part 2 CFR Section 200.318 requires that recipients and subrecipients maintain and use documented procedures for procurement transactions under federal awards and subawards, including for acquisition of property or services. It also requires that recipients and subrecipients maintain records sufficient to detail the history of each procurement transaction. These records must include the rationale for the procurement method, contract type selection, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract type. Suspension and Debarment: Part 2 CFR Section 180.300 describes federal requirements related to suspension and debarment for federal award recipients. The standards require that a federal award recipient verify that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not suspended and debarred. Procedures for satisfying such requirements should be documented, and evidence of such procedures should be maintained. Condition Procurement: The Organization has a documented procurement policy. However, we were unable to view records detailing the history of the Organization’s two procurement transactions and that steps required by the Organization’s procurement were completed for the transactions. Suspension and Debarment: We were unable to see evidence that the Organization verified two vendors with which it entered a covered transaction were not suspended and debarred before the date it entered the transaction with such vendors. During our audit procedures, we noted that the vendors were not suspended and debarred.Questioned Costs: None Context: Procurement: Two instances were noted during testing of eight transactions above the Organization’s micro purchase threshold. Suspension and Debarment: Two instances were noted during testing of two coveredtransactions. Cause: We were unable to view evidence that the Organization's documented procurement, and suspension and debarment policies were followed. Effect: The Organization is not in compliance with federal requirements related to documented procurement, and suspension and debarment procedures. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization document and maintain evidence of: its completion of the required steps of its procurement policy for applicable transactions, and suspension and debarment checks and procedures the Organization performs over vendors.Documentation and evidence of these procedures should be maintained to help show that the Organization in compliance with requirements specified in the Uniform Guidance. Views of responsible officials: Management partially agrees with this finding. Regarding suspension and debarment, CLS agrees on improving the documentation to comply and demonstrate compliance with this requirement, though CLS disagrees with the characterization of material weakness. Regarding the two procurement transactions, CLS disagrees strongly that these transactions were procurements subject to the CLS accounting manual procurement section. CLS provided documentation to the auditors demonstrating that these were not procurements but were, in fact, required by existing leases. In one instance, our Denver landlord required us to pay a “catch-up” payment for operating expenses it had underbilled us previously; this cannot conceivably have been a procurement as we did not have discretion not to pay it and it was required by an existing lease. The second instance was a payment related to the expansion of leased office space in Colorado Springs; that also was not a procurement as there was no alternative but to pay the existing landlord for increased space, and it could not conceivably have been conducive to third-party bidding etc. We understand that the auditors may prefer to have a sole source letter in these instances, but we disagree with any finding that this is required by our accounting manual and the auditors have pointed to no specific language in the accounting manual for this requirement. Auditor’s Concluding Remarks: Management’s response did not persuade the auditor to revise the finding. Part 2 CFR Section 200.318 requires that recipients and subrecipients maintain and use documented procedures for procurement transactions under federal awards and subawards, including for acquisition of property or services. It also requires that recipients and subrecipients maintain records sufficient to detail the history of each procurement transaction. These records must include the rationale for the procurement method, contract type selection, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract type. We were unable to see evidence of the federally required documentation. The Organization’s accounting manual states that leases of office buildings and office storage space and contracted services are considered procurements.
Criteria or Specific Requirement Procurement: Part 2 CFR Section 200.318 requires that recipients and subrecipients maintain and use documented procedures for procurement transactions under federal awards and subawards, including for acquisition of property or services. It also requires that recipients and subrecipients maintain records sufficient to detail the history of each procurement transaction. These records must include the rationale for the procurement method, contract type selection, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract type. Suspension and Debarment: Part 2 CFR Section 180.300 describes federal requirements related to suspension and debarment for federal award recipients. The standards require that a federal award recipient verify that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not suspended and debarred. Procedures for satisfying such requirements should be documented, and evidence of such procedures should be maintained. Condition Procurement: The Organization has a documented procurement policy. However, we were unable to view records detailing the history of the Organization’s two procurement transactions and that steps required by the Organization’s procurement were completed for the transactions. Suspension and Debarment: We were unable to see evidence that the Organization verified two vendors with which it entered a covered transaction were not suspended and debarred before the date it entered the transaction with such vendors. During our audit procedures, we noted that the vendors were not suspended and debarred.Questioned Costs: None Context: Procurement: Two instances were noted during testing of eight transactions above the Organization’s micro purchase threshold. Suspension and Debarment: Two instances were noted during testing of two coveredtransactions. Cause: We were unable to view evidence that the Organization's documented procurement, and suspension and debarment policies were followed. Effect: The Organization is not in compliance with federal requirements related to documented procurement, and suspension and debarment procedures. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization document and maintain evidence of: its completion of the required steps of its procurement policy for applicable transactions, and suspension and debarment checks and procedures the Organization performs over vendors.Documentation and evidence of these procedures should be maintained to help show that the Organization in compliance with requirements specified in the Uniform Guidance. Views of responsible officials: Management partially agrees with this finding. Regarding suspension and debarment, CLS agrees on improving the documentation to comply and demonstrate compliance with this requirement, though CLS disagrees with the characterization of material weakness. Regarding the two procurement transactions, CLS disagrees strongly that these transactions were procurements subject to the CLS accounting manual procurement section. CLS provided documentation to the auditors demonstrating that these were not procurements but were, in fact, required by existing leases. In one instance, our Denver landlord required us to pay a “catch-up” payment for operating expenses it had underbilled us previously; this cannot conceivably have been a procurement as we did not have discretion not to pay it and it was required by an existing lease. The second instance was a payment related to the expansion of leased office space in Colorado Springs; that also was not a procurement as there was no alternative but to pay the existing landlord for increased space, and it could not conceivably have been conducive to third-party bidding etc. We understand that the auditors may prefer to have a sole source letter in these instances, but we disagree with any finding that this is required by our accounting manual and the auditors have pointed to no specific language in the accounting manual for this requirement. Auditor’s Concluding Remarks: Management’s response did not persuade the auditor to revise the finding. Part 2 CFR Section 200.318 requires that recipients and subrecipients maintain and use documented procedures for procurement transactions under federal awards and subawards, including for acquisition of property or services. It also requires that recipients and subrecipients maintain records sufficient to detail the history of each procurement transaction. These records must include the rationale for the procurement method, contract type selection, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract type. We were unable to see evidence of the federally required documentation. The Organization’s accounting manual states that leases of office buildings and office storage space and contracted services are considered procurements.
Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Federal agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Program: Continuation of the National Evaluations System for Health Technology Coordinating Center Assistance listing number: 93.103 Federal award identification number and year: • 2U01FD006292-06 2024 • 3U01FD006292-06S1 2023 Criteria: 2 CFR 200.318 states non-federal entities must have and use documented procurement procedures that conform to 2 CFR 200.317 through 200.327. 2 CFR 200.214 states non-Federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Order 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR Part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. 2 CFR 200 requires adequate documentation of compliance with 2 CFR 200.214. Condition and context: The Organization established policies and procedures over suspension and debarment, including checking all vendors against the government suspension and debarment listing. The policies and procedures for suspension and debarment were being followed however the evidence of the search on sam.gov was not retained. A sample of five vendors with a total contract value of $8,528,526 was selected from a population of twelve. Cause: The Organization’s management did not retain evidence of compliance with the above criteria regarding suspension and debarment due to oversight. Effect: The Organization’s documentation was lacking evidence of tracking vendors for suspension and debarment. Questioned costs: None Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend management updates its policies and procedures to ensure adequate supporting documentation of suspension and debarment verification is maintained. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan.
Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Federal agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Program: Continuation of the National Evaluations System for Health Technology Coordinating Center Assistance listing number: 93.103 Federal award identification number and year: • 2U01FD006292-06 2024 • 3U01FD006292-06S1 2023 Criteria: 2 CFR 200.318 states non-federal entities must have and use documented procurement procedures that conform to 2 CFR 200.317 through 200.327. 2 CFR 200.214 states non-Federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Order 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR Part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. 2 CFR 200 requires adequate documentation of compliance with 2 CFR 200.214. Condition and context: The Organization established policies and procedures over suspension and debarment, including checking all vendors against the government suspension and debarment listing. The policies and procedures for suspension and debarment were being followed however the evidence of the search on sam.gov was not retained. A sample of five vendors with a total contract value of $8,528,526 was selected from a population of twelve. Cause: The Organization’s management did not retain evidence of compliance with the above criteria regarding suspension and debarment due to oversight. Effect: The Organization’s documentation was lacking evidence of tracking vendors for suspension and debarment. Questioned costs: None Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend management updates its policies and procedures to ensure adequate supporting documentation of suspension and debarment verification is maintained. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan.