Criteria - 2 CFR 200.318 A component of compliance relating to federal awards is maintaining records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not limited to, the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Condition - The District used federal ESSER funds to make purchases greater than $10,000 to $21,900 without obtaining at least three quotes and made purchases greater than $21,900 without obtaining three public bids. Cause/Effect Cause of the Finding ? There was a breakdown in the previously established purchasing policy relating to obtaining quotes and bid requirements. In addition, the district was under the false notion that purchases made through the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania?s cooperative purchasing program COSTARS and PEPPM satisfied compliance requirement of quote/bid requirements for federal purchases. Effect of the Finding ? The District was not in compliance with procurement requirements for federal funds. Questioned Costs ? Total questioned costs - $793,135 - Purchases made under the false notion that PEPPM satisfied the three?quote requirement total $16,365 (2% of ESSERS expense), purchases made under the false notion that COSTAR satisfied the three-bid requirement total $401,962 (43% of ESSERS expense), and purchases that were made outside co-purchasing arrangements and did not satisfy three-bid requirement total $374,805 (40% of ESSERS expense). Recommendations - The Uniform Guidance establishes thresholds of when quote and bids are to be obtained from vendors. Documentation is key for all federal purchases. A purchase price from cooperative purchasing programs can be considered one competitive price proposal and cannot replace a procurement process. Advertise when appropriate, obtain adequate quote/bid information from three vendors, and thoroughly document the ?reason? and ?cost analysis? of sole source noncompetitive procurement exceptions. District?s Response - The district will follow the policy for quotation/bid requirements for federal purchases and not use cooperative purchasing programs as the only source of quotations/bids for federal purchases. The district will also improve documentation relating to purchases that meet sole source criteria.
Criteria - 2 CFR 200.318 A component of compliance relating to federal awards is maintaining records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not limited to, the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Condition - The District used federal ESSER funds to make purchases greater than $10,000 to $21,900 without obtaining at least three quotes and made purchases greater than $21,900 without obtaining three public bids. Cause/Effect Cause of the Finding ? There was a breakdown in the previously established purchasing policy relating to obtaining quotes and bid requirements. In addition, the district was under the false notion that purchases made through the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania?s cooperative purchasing program COSTARS and PEPPM satisfied compliance requirement of quote/bid requirements for federal purchases. Effect of the Finding ? The District was not in compliance with procurement requirements for federal funds. Questioned Costs ? Total questioned costs - $793,135 - Purchases made under the false notion that PEPPM satisfied the three?quote requirement total $16,365 (2% of ESSERS expense), purchases made under the false notion that COSTAR satisfied the three-bid requirement total $401,962 (43% of ESSERS expense), and purchases that were made outside co-purchasing arrangements and did not satisfy three-bid requirement total $374,805 (40% of ESSERS expense). Recommendations - The Uniform Guidance establishes thresholds of when quote and bids are to be obtained from vendors. Documentation is key for all federal purchases. A purchase price from cooperative purchasing programs can be considered one competitive price proposal and cannot replace a procurement process. Advertise when appropriate, obtain adequate quote/bid information from three vendors, and thoroughly document the ?reason? and ?cost analysis? of sole source noncompetitive procurement exceptions. District?s Response - The district will follow the policy for quotation/bid requirements for federal purchases and not use cooperative purchasing programs as the only source of quotations/bids for federal purchases. The district will also improve documentation relating to purchases that meet sole source criteria.
Criteria - 2 CFR 200.318 A component of compliance relating to federal awards is maintaining records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not limited to, the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Condition - The District used federal ESSER funds to make purchases greater than $10,000 to $21,900 without obtaining at least three quotes and made purchases greater than $21,900 without obtaining three public bids. Cause/Effect Cause of the Finding ? There was a breakdown in the previously established purchasing policy relating to obtaining quotes and bid requirements. In addition, the district was under the false notion that purchases made through the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania?s cooperative purchasing program COSTARS and PEPPM satisfied compliance requirement of quote/bid requirements for federal purchases. Effect of the Finding ? The District was not in compliance with procurement requirements for federal funds. Questioned Costs ? Total questioned costs - $793,135 - Purchases made under the false notion that PEPPM satisfied the three?quote requirement total $16,365 (2% of ESSERS expense), purchases made under the false notion that COSTAR satisfied the three-bid requirement total $401,962 (43% of ESSERS expense), and purchases that were made outside co-purchasing arrangements and did not satisfy three-bid requirement total $374,805 (40% of ESSERS expense). Recommendations - The Uniform Guidance establishes thresholds of when quote and bids are to be obtained from vendors. Documentation is key for all federal purchases. A purchase price from cooperative purchasing programs can be considered one competitive price proposal and cannot replace a procurement process. Advertise when appropriate, obtain adequate quote/bid information from three vendors, and thoroughly document the ?reason? and ?cost analysis? of sole source noncompetitive procurement exceptions. District?s Response - The district will follow the policy for quotation/bid requirements for federal purchases and not use cooperative purchasing programs as the only source of quotations/bids for federal purchases. The district will also improve documentation relating to purchases that meet sole source criteria.
Criteria - 2 CFR 200.318 A component of compliance relating to federal awards is maintaining records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not limited to, the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Condition - The District used federal ESSER funds to make purchases greater than $10,000 to $21,900 without obtaining at least three quotes and made purchases greater than $21,900 without obtaining three public bids. Cause/Effect Cause of the Finding ? There was a breakdown in the previously established purchasing policy relating to obtaining quotes and bid requirements. In addition, the district was under the false notion that purchases made through the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania?s cooperative purchasing program COSTARS and PEPPM satisfied compliance requirement of quote/bid requirements for federal purchases. Effect of the Finding ? The District was not in compliance with procurement requirements for federal funds. Questioned Costs ? Total questioned costs - $793,135 - Purchases made under the false notion that PEPPM satisfied the three?quote requirement total $16,365 (2% of ESSERS expense), purchases made under the false notion that COSTAR satisfied the three-bid requirement total $401,962 (43% of ESSERS expense), and purchases that were made outside co-purchasing arrangements and did not satisfy three-bid requirement total $374,805 (40% of ESSERS expense). Recommendations - The Uniform Guidance establishes thresholds of when quote and bids are to be obtained from vendors. Documentation is key for all federal purchases. A purchase price from cooperative purchasing programs can be considered one competitive price proposal and cannot replace a procurement process. Advertise when appropriate, obtain adequate quote/bid information from three vendors, and thoroughly document the ?reason? and ?cost analysis? of sole source noncompetitive procurement exceptions. District?s Response - The district will follow the policy for quotation/bid requirements for federal purchases and not use cooperative purchasing programs as the only source of quotations/bids for federal purchases. The district will also improve documentation relating to purchases that meet sole source criteria.
Criteria - 2 CFR 200.318 A component of compliance relating to federal awards is maintaining records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not limited to, the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Condition - The District used federal ESSER funds to make purchases greater than $10,000 to $21,900 without obtaining at least three quotes and made purchases greater than $21,900 without obtaining three public bids. Cause/Effect Cause of the Finding ? There was a breakdown in the previously established purchasing policy relating to obtaining quotes and bid requirements. In addition, the district was under the false notion that purchases made through the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania?s cooperative purchasing program COSTARS and PEPPM satisfied compliance requirement of quote/bid requirements for federal purchases. Effect of the Finding ? The District was not in compliance with procurement requirements for federal funds. Questioned Costs ? Total questioned costs - $793,135 - Purchases made under the false notion that PEPPM satisfied the three?quote requirement total $16,365 (2% of ESSERS expense), purchases made under the false notion that COSTAR satisfied the three-bid requirement total $401,962 (43% of ESSERS expense), and purchases that were made outside co-purchasing arrangements and did not satisfy three-bid requirement total $374,805 (40% of ESSERS expense). Recommendations - The Uniform Guidance establishes thresholds of when quote and bids are to be obtained from vendors. Documentation is key for all federal purchases. A purchase price from cooperative purchasing programs can be considered one competitive price proposal and cannot replace a procurement process. Advertise when appropriate, obtain adequate quote/bid information from three vendors, and thoroughly document the ?reason? and ?cost analysis? of sole source noncompetitive procurement exceptions. District?s Response - The district will follow the policy for quotation/bid requirements for federal purchases and not use cooperative purchasing programs as the only source of quotations/bids for federal purchases. The district will also improve documentation relating to purchases that meet sole source criteria.
Criteria - 2 CFR 200.318 A component of compliance relating to federal awards is maintaining records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not limited to, the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Condition - The District used federal ESSER funds to make purchases greater than $10,000 to $21,900 without obtaining at least three quotes and made purchases greater than $21,900 without obtaining three public bids. Cause/Effect Cause of the Finding ? There was a breakdown in the previously established purchasing policy relating to obtaining quotes and bid requirements. In addition, the district was under the false notion that purchases made through the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania?s cooperative purchasing program COSTARS and PEPPM satisfied compliance requirement of quote/bid requirements for federal purchases. Effect of the Finding ? The District was not in compliance with procurement requirements for federal funds. Questioned Costs ? Total questioned costs - $793,135 - Purchases made under the false notion that PEPPM satisfied the three?quote requirement total $16,365 (2% of ESSERS expense), purchases made under the false notion that COSTAR satisfied the three-bid requirement total $401,962 (43% of ESSERS expense), and purchases that were made outside co-purchasing arrangements and did not satisfy three-bid requirement total $374,805 (40% of ESSERS expense). Recommendations - The Uniform Guidance establishes thresholds of when quote and bids are to be obtained from vendors. Documentation is key for all federal purchases. A purchase price from cooperative purchasing programs can be considered one competitive price proposal and cannot replace a procurement process. Advertise when appropriate, obtain adequate quote/bid information from three vendors, and thoroughly document the ?reason? and ?cost analysis? of sole source noncompetitive procurement exceptions. District?s Response - The district will follow the policy for quotation/bid requirements for federal purchases and not use cooperative purchasing programs as the only source of quotations/bids for federal purchases. The district will also improve documentation relating to purchases that meet sole source criteria.
Finding 2022-001 Procurement Policy Criteria: Non-Federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200. A non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors? performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) and (b). Under the micro-purchase method, the aggregate dollar amount does not exceed $3,500 ($2,000 in the case of acquisition for construction subject to the Wage Rate Requirements (Davis-Bacon Act)). Small purchase procedures are used for purchases that exceed the micro-purchase amount but do not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive quotations if the non-federal entity considers the price to be reasonable (2 CFR section 200.320(a)). If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources (2 CFR section 200.320(b)). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(c); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320(d); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(f). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(d)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR part 200, ?Contract Provisions for Non- Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.? Non-federal entities had a grace period of two full fiscal years after the effective date of the Uniform Guidance before they had to comply with the procurement requirements of 2 CFR section 200. For a non-federal entity with a fiscal year-end of June 30, its effective date for the procurement requirements was July 1, 2017. However, during this grace period, non-federal entities were required to clearly document whether they decided to comply with the previous version of the applicable procurement standards or the new standards contained in the Uniform Guidance. Condition: The City has not updated its purchasing policies and procedures to bring it into compliance with the requirements of Uniform Guidance. The City has also not formally documented whether it has decided to extend its applicable date of compliance with 2 CFR part 200 to be effective beginning July 1, 2018. The City is not in compliance with the procurement policy provisions of 2 CFR part 200 and the Uniform Guidance. Not updating the City?s procurement policy could lead to future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards. The current audit did not identify noncompliance with direct and material compliance requirements of the major federal award program. The City has not updated its purchasing policies and procedures to bring it into compliance with the requirements of Uniform Guidance. The City has also not formally documented whether it has decided to extend its applicable date of compliance with 2 CFR part 200 to be effective beginning July 1, 2018. Context: See condition above for context of the finding. Cause: The City has not evaluated its existing procurement policies for compliance with the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Effect: The City is not in compliance with the procurement policy provisions of 2 CFR part 200 and the Uniform Guidance. Not updating the City?s procurement policy could lead to future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards. The current audit did not identify noncompliance with direct and material compliance requirements of the major federal award program. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Yes. 2021-001. Recommendation: The City should evaluate and update existing purchasing policies and procedures in order to bring the City into compliance with the procurement policy requirements of 2 CFR part 200 and the Uniform Guidance. The updated policy should include, among other things: 1. Thresholds and appropriate approval procedures for allowable federal procurement methods. 2. Written standards for how conflicts of interest involving employees engaged to select, award, and administer contracts will be governed. 3. How to ensure that contracts and awards are made only to responsible and eligible contractors and how oversight of contractor performance will be monitored. 4. How records will be maintained in order to document the history of federal procurements. Views of Responsible Officials: The City is still in the process of working with an outside firm on a review of procurement and purchasing policies. The consultation includes compliance review of this standard. Expected completion ? FYE 2023.
Finding 2022-001 Procurement Policy Criteria: Non-Federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200. A non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors? performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) and (b). Under the micro-purchase method, the aggregate dollar amount does not exceed $3,500 ($2,000 in the case of acquisition for construction subject to the Wage Rate Requirements (Davis-Bacon Act)). Small purchase procedures are used for purchases that exceed the micro-purchase amount but do not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive quotations if the non-federal entity considers the price to be reasonable (2 CFR section 200.320(a)). If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources (2 CFR section 200.320(b)). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(c); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320(d); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(f). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(d)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR part 200, ?Contract Provisions for Non- Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.? Non-federal entities had a grace period of two full fiscal years after the effective date of the Uniform Guidance before they had to comply with the procurement requirements of 2 CFR section 200. For a non-federal entity with a fiscal year-end of June 30, its effective date for the procurement requirements was July 1, 2017. However, during this grace period, non-federal entities were required to clearly document whether they decided to comply with the previous version of the applicable procurement standards or the new standards contained in the Uniform Guidance. Condition: The City has not updated its purchasing policies and procedures to bring it into compliance with the requirements of Uniform Guidance. The City has also not formally documented whether it has decided to extend its applicable date of compliance with 2 CFR part 200 to be effective beginning July 1, 2018. The City is not in compliance with the procurement policy provisions of 2 CFR part 200 and the Uniform Guidance. Not updating the City?s procurement policy could lead to future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards. The current audit did not identify noncompliance with direct and material compliance requirements of the major federal award program. The City has not updated its purchasing policies and procedures to bring it into compliance with the requirements of Uniform Guidance. The City has also not formally documented whether it has decided to extend its applicable date of compliance with 2 CFR part 200 to be effective beginning July 1, 2018. Context: See condition above for context of the finding. Cause: The City has not evaluated its existing procurement policies for compliance with the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Effect: The City is not in compliance with the procurement policy provisions of 2 CFR part 200 and the Uniform Guidance. Not updating the City?s procurement policy could lead to future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards. The current audit did not identify noncompliance with direct and material compliance requirements of the major federal award program. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Yes. 2021-001. Recommendation: The City should evaluate and update existing purchasing policies and procedures in order to bring the City into compliance with the procurement policy requirements of 2 CFR part 200 and the Uniform Guidance. The updated policy should include, among other things: 1. Thresholds and appropriate approval procedures for allowable federal procurement methods. 2. Written standards for how conflicts of interest involving employees engaged to select, award, and administer contracts will be governed. 3. How to ensure that contracts and awards are made only to responsible and eligible contractors and how oversight of contractor performance will be monitored. 4. How records will be maintained in order to document the history of federal procurements. Views of Responsible Officials: The City is still in the process of working with an outside firm on a review of procurement and purchasing policies. The consultation includes compliance review of this standard. Expected completion ? FYE 2023.
Finding 2022-001 Procurement Policy Criteria: Non-Federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200. A non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors? performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) and (b). Under the micro-purchase method, the aggregate dollar amount does not exceed $3,500 ($2,000 in the case of acquisition for construction subject to the Wage Rate Requirements (Davis-Bacon Act)). Small purchase procedures are used for purchases that exceed the micro-purchase amount but do not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive quotations if the non-federal entity considers the price to be reasonable (2 CFR section 200.320(a)). If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources (2 CFR section 200.320(b)). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(c); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320(d); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(f). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(d)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR part 200, ?Contract Provisions for Non- Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.? Non-federal entities had a grace period of two full fiscal years after the effective date of the Uniform Guidance before they had to comply with the procurement requirements of 2 CFR section 200. For a non-federal entity with a fiscal year-end of June 30, its effective date for the procurement requirements was July 1, 2017. However, during this grace period, non-federal entities were required to clearly document whether they decided to comply with the previous version of the applicable procurement standards or the new standards contained in the Uniform Guidance. Condition: The City has not updated its purchasing policies and procedures to bring it into compliance with the requirements of Uniform Guidance. The City has also not formally documented whether it has decided to extend its applicable date of compliance with 2 CFR part 200 to be effective beginning July 1, 2018. The City is not in compliance with the procurement policy provisions of 2 CFR part 200 and the Uniform Guidance. Not updating the City?s procurement policy could lead to future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards. The current audit did not identify noncompliance with direct and material compliance requirements of the major federal award program. The City has not updated its purchasing policies and procedures to bring it into compliance with the requirements of Uniform Guidance. The City has also not formally documented whether it has decided to extend its applicable date of compliance with 2 CFR part 200 to be effective beginning July 1, 2018. Context: See condition above for context of the finding. Cause: The City has not evaluated its existing procurement policies for compliance with the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Effect: The City is not in compliance with the procurement policy provisions of 2 CFR part 200 and the Uniform Guidance. Not updating the City?s procurement policy could lead to future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards. The current audit did not identify noncompliance with direct and material compliance requirements of the major federal award program. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Yes. 2021-001. Recommendation: The City should evaluate and update existing purchasing policies and procedures in order to bring the City into compliance with the procurement policy requirements of 2 CFR part 200 and the Uniform Guidance. The updated policy should include, among other things: 1. Thresholds and appropriate approval procedures for allowable federal procurement methods. 2. Written standards for how conflicts of interest involving employees engaged to select, award, and administer contracts will be governed. 3. How to ensure that contracts and awards are made only to responsible and eligible contractors and how oversight of contractor performance will be monitored. 4. How records will be maintained in order to document the history of federal procurements. Views of Responsible Officials: The City is still in the process of working with an outside firm on a review of procurement and purchasing policies. The consultation includes compliance review of this standard. Expected completion ? FYE 2023.
Finding 2022-001 Procurement Policy Criteria: Non-Federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200. A non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors? performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) and (b). Under the micro-purchase method, the aggregate dollar amount does not exceed $3,500 ($2,000 in the case of acquisition for construction subject to the Wage Rate Requirements (Davis-Bacon Act)). Small purchase procedures are used for purchases that exceed the micro-purchase amount but do not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive quotations if the non-federal entity considers the price to be reasonable (2 CFR section 200.320(a)). If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources (2 CFR section 200.320(b)). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(c); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320(d); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(f). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(d)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR part 200, ?Contract Provisions for Non- Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.? Non-federal entities had a grace period of two full fiscal years after the effective date of the Uniform Guidance before they had to comply with the procurement requirements of 2 CFR section 200. For a non-federal entity with a fiscal year-end of June 30, its effective date for the procurement requirements was July 1, 2017. However, during this grace period, non-federal entities were required to clearly document whether they decided to comply with the previous version of the applicable procurement standards or the new standards contained in the Uniform Guidance. Condition: The City has not updated its purchasing policies and procedures to bring it into compliance with the requirements of Uniform Guidance. The City has also not formally documented whether it has decided to extend its applicable date of compliance with 2 CFR part 200 to be effective beginning July 1, 2018. The City is not in compliance with the procurement policy provisions of 2 CFR part 200 and the Uniform Guidance. Not updating the City?s procurement policy could lead to future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards. The current audit did not identify noncompliance with direct and material compliance requirements of the major federal award program. The City has not updated its purchasing policies and procedures to bring it into compliance with the requirements of Uniform Guidance. The City has also not formally documented whether it has decided to extend its applicable date of compliance with 2 CFR part 200 to be effective beginning July 1, 2018. Context: See condition above for context of the finding. Cause: The City has not evaluated its existing procurement policies for compliance with the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Effect: The City is not in compliance with the procurement policy provisions of 2 CFR part 200 and the Uniform Guidance. Not updating the City?s procurement policy could lead to future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards. The current audit did not identify noncompliance with direct and material compliance requirements of the major federal award program. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Yes. 2021-001. Recommendation: The City should evaluate and update existing purchasing policies and procedures in order to bring the City into compliance with the procurement policy requirements of 2 CFR part 200 and the Uniform Guidance. The updated policy should include, among other things: 1. Thresholds and appropriate approval procedures for allowable federal procurement methods. 2. Written standards for how conflicts of interest involving employees engaged to select, award, and administer contracts will be governed. 3. How to ensure that contracts and awards are made only to responsible and eligible contractors and how oversight of contractor performance will be monitored. 4. How records will be maintained in order to document the history of federal procurements. Views of Responsible Officials: The City is still in the process of working with an outside firm on a review of procurement and purchasing policies. The consultation includes compliance review of this standard. Expected completion ? FYE 2023.
Finding 2022-002?Procurement Program: Protecting and Improving Health Globally: Building and Strengthening Public Health Impact, Systems, Capacity and Security Assistance Listing No.: 93.318 Federal Award Number: NU50CK000584 Federal Award Year: 2021, 2022 Type of Finding: Material weakness and material instance of noncompliance Criteria: Per 2 CFR 200.303, the Council must establish and maintain effective internal controls over federal awards that provide reasonable assurance that it is managing federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations and provisions of contracts or grant agreements that could have a material effect on each of its federal programs. Non-federal entities other than states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Entities must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200. A non-federal entity must use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) and (b). Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive quotations if the non-federal entity considers the price to be reasonable (2 CFR section 200.320(a). If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources (2 CFR section 200.320(b)). Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. ?Covered transactions? include contracts for good and services awarded under non-procurement transaction that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. Condition: The Council did not retain documentation or other evidence that the procurement process was performed for certain program expenditures during the year. Cause: Control procedures did not function as designed and thus compliance with procurement requirements was not followed. Effect: Not performing the procurement process increases the risk of noncompliance with rules and regulations. Questioned costs: None known Context: We selected three transactions to test controls and compliance over small purchases and noted there was no support for procurement compliance or controls over compliance for these three transactions. Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend management review, revise, and test current control procedures and make any necessary changes to ensure compliance with criteria above. View of responsible officials: Management concurs with the finding. See corrective action plan.
FA 2022-001 Improve Controls over Procurement Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Internal Control Impact: Material Weakness Compliance Impact: Material Noncompliance Federal Awarding Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-Through Entity: Georgia Department of Education AL Numbers and Titles: 84.027 ? Special Education Grants to States COVID-19 ? 84.027 ? Special Education Grants to States 84.173 ? Special Education Preschool Grants COVID-19 ? 84.173 ? Special Education Preschool Grants Federal Award Numbers: H027A200073 (Year: 2021), H027A210073 (Year: 2022), H027X210073 (Year: 2022), H173A200081 (Year: 2021), H173A210081 (Year: 2022), H173X210081 (Year: 2022) Questioned Costs: $72,747 Description: A review of expenditures charged to the Special Education Cluster (Assistance Listing Numbers 84.027 and 84.173) revealed that the School District?s internal control procedures were not operating appropriately to ensure that the School District?s procurement procedures were followed. Background: The Special Education Cluster, which is comprised of the Special Education Grants to States (IDEA, Part B) and Special Education Preschool Grants (IDEA Preschool) programs, was created by the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). Special Education Cluster funding is available to ensure that all children with disabilities have available to them a free appropriate public education that emphasizes special education and related services designed to meet their unique needs and prepares them for further education, employment, and independent living; ensure that the rights of children with disabilities and their parents are protected; assist states, localities, educational service agencies, and federal agencies to provide for the education of all children with disabilities; and assess and ensure the effectiveness of efforts to educate children with disabilities. Special Education Cluster funding was granted to the Georgia Department of Education (GaDOE) by the U.S. Department of Education (ED). GaDOE is responsible for distributing funds to LEAs and overseeing the expenditure of funds by LEAs. Special Education Cluster funds totaling $1,381,680 were expended and reported on the Madison County Board of Education?s Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) for fiscal year 2022. Criteria: As a recipient of federal awards, the School District is required to establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance of managing the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal awards pursuant to Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), Section 200.303 ? Internal Controls. In addition, provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.318 ? General Procurement Standards state in part that ?(a) the non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and? (b) non-Federal entities must maintain oversight to ensure that contractors perform in accordance with the terms, conditions, and specifications of their contracts or purchase orders.? Furthermore, provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.320 ? Methods of Procurement to Be Followed provide guidance for procurement through small purchase procedures and state ?If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources?? Condition: A sample of 30 procurement transactions was randomly selected for testing using a non-statistical sampling approach. These transactions were reviewed to determine if appropriate internal controls were implemented and applicable compliance requirements were met. Though no problems were noted with the micro-purchase transactions tested, auditors encountered the significant issues in testing small purchase transactions; therefore, the entire population of small purchase transactions was ultimately tested. Upon review of these transactions, it was noted that the School District could not provide evidence that an adequate number of rate or price quotations was obtained from qualified sources for eight vendors associated with small purchase expenditures. Questioned Costs: Questioned costs of $72,747 were identified for all small purchase expenditures that did not follow the School District?s procurement procedures. Cause: In discussing the deficiencies with management, they stated that internal control procedures related to procurement were not being followed appropriately. In addition, management did not adequately monitor the procurement internal control procedures. Effect: The School District is not in compliance with the Uniform Guidance and GaDOE guidance. Failure to appropriately implement procedures to address procurement compliance requirements exposes the School District to unnecessary risk of error and misuse of Federal funds. In addition, this deficiency could lead to the return of grant funds associated with unallowable expenditures. Recommendation: The School District should evaluate and improve internal control procedures to ensure that required procurement procedures are followed, and appropriate documentation is obtained and retained on-file. In addition, management should develop a monitoring process to ensure that these procedures are operating effectively and as designed. Views of Responsible Officials: We concur with this finding.
FA 2022-001 Improve Controls over Procurement Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Internal Control Impact: Material Weakness Compliance Impact: Material Noncompliance Federal Awarding Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-Through Entity: Georgia Department of Education AL Numbers and Titles: 84.027 ? Special Education Grants to States COVID-19 ? 84.027 ? Special Education Grants to States 84.173 ? Special Education Preschool Grants COVID-19 ? 84.173 ? Special Education Preschool Grants Federal Award Numbers: H027A200073 (Year: 2021), H027A210073 (Year: 2022), H027X210073 (Year: 2022), H173A200081 (Year: 2021), H173A210081 (Year: 2022), H173X210081 (Year: 2022) Questioned Costs: $72,747 Description: A review of expenditures charged to the Special Education Cluster (Assistance Listing Numbers 84.027 and 84.173) revealed that the School District?s internal control procedures were not operating appropriately to ensure that the School District?s procurement procedures were followed. Background: The Special Education Cluster, which is comprised of the Special Education Grants to States (IDEA, Part B) and Special Education Preschool Grants (IDEA Preschool) programs, was created by the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). Special Education Cluster funding is available to ensure that all children with disabilities have available to them a free appropriate public education that emphasizes special education and related services designed to meet their unique needs and prepares them for further education, employment, and independent living; ensure that the rights of children with disabilities and their parents are protected; assist states, localities, educational service agencies, and federal agencies to provide for the education of all children with disabilities; and assess and ensure the effectiveness of efforts to educate children with disabilities. Special Education Cluster funding was granted to the Georgia Department of Education (GaDOE) by the U.S. Department of Education (ED). GaDOE is responsible for distributing funds to LEAs and overseeing the expenditure of funds by LEAs. Special Education Cluster funds totaling $1,381,680 were expended and reported on the Madison County Board of Education?s Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) for fiscal year 2022. Criteria: As a recipient of federal awards, the School District is required to establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance of managing the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal awards pursuant to Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), Section 200.303 ? Internal Controls. In addition, provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.318 ? General Procurement Standards state in part that ?(a) the non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and? (b) non-Federal entities must maintain oversight to ensure that contractors perform in accordance with the terms, conditions, and specifications of their contracts or purchase orders.? Furthermore, provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.320 ? Methods of Procurement to Be Followed provide guidance for procurement through small purchase procedures and state ?If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources?? Condition: A sample of 30 procurement transactions was randomly selected for testing using a non-statistical sampling approach. These transactions were reviewed to determine if appropriate internal controls were implemented and applicable compliance requirements were met. Though no problems were noted with the micro-purchase transactions tested, auditors encountered the significant issues in testing small purchase transactions; therefore, the entire population of small purchase transactions was ultimately tested. Upon review of these transactions, it was noted that the School District could not provide evidence that an adequate number of rate or price quotations was obtained from qualified sources for eight vendors associated with small purchase expenditures. Questioned Costs: Questioned costs of $72,747 were identified for all small purchase expenditures that did not follow the School District?s procurement procedures. Cause: In discussing the deficiencies with management, they stated that internal control procedures related to procurement were not being followed appropriately. In addition, management did not adequately monitor the procurement internal control procedures. Effect: The School District is not in compliance with the Uniform Guidance and GaDOE guidance. Failure to appropriately implement procedures to address procurement compliance requirements exposes the School District to unnecessary risk of error and misuse of Federal funds. In addition, this deficiency could lead to the return of grant funds associated with unallowable expenditures. Recommendation: The School District should evaluate and improve internal control procedures to ensure that required procurement procedures are followed, and appropriate documentation is obtained and retained on-file. In addition, management should develop a monitoring process to ensure that these procedures are operating effectively and as designed. Views of Responsible Officials: We concur with this finding.
FA 2022-001 Improve Controls over Procurement Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Internal Control Impact: Material Weakness Compliance Impact: Material Noncompliance Federal Awarding Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-Through Entity: Georgia Department of Education AL Numbers and Titles: 84.027 ? Special Education Grants to States COVID-19 ? 84.027 ? Special Education Grants to States 84.173 ? Special Education Preschool Grants COVID-19 ? 84.173 ? Special Education Preschool Grants Federal Award Numbers: H027A200073 (Year: 2021), H027A210073 (Year: 2022), H027X210073 (Year: 2022), H173A200081 (Year: 2021), H173A210081 (Year: 2022), H173X210081 (Year: 2022) Questioned Costs: $72,747 Description: A review of expenditures charged to the Special Education Cluster (Assistance Listing Numbers 84.027 and 84.173) revealed that the School District?s internal control procedures were not operating appropriately to ensure that the School District?s procurement procedures were followed. Background: The Special Education Cluster, which is comprised of the Special Education Grants to States (IDEA, Part B) and Special Education Preschool Grants (IDEA Preschool) programs, was created by the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). Special Education Cluster funding is available to ensure that all children with disabilities have available to them a free appropriate public education that emphasizes special education and related services designed to meet their unique needs and prepares them for further education, employment, and independent living; ensure that the rights of children with disabilities and their parents are protected; assist states, localities, educational service agencies, and federal agencies to provide for the education of all children with disabilities; and assess and ensure the effectiveness of efforts to educate children with disabilities. Special Education Cluster funding was granted to the Georgia Department of Education (GaDOE) by the U.S. Department of Education (ED). GaDOE is responsible for distributing funds to LEAs and overseeing the expenditure of funds by LEAs. Special Education Cluster funds totaling $1,381,680 were expended and reported on the Madison County Board of Education?s Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) for fiscal year 2022. Criteria: As a recipient of federal awards, the School District is required to establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance of managing the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal awards pursuant to Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), Section 200.303 ? Internal Controls. In addition, provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.318 ? General Procurement Standards state in part that ?(a) the non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and? (b) non-Federal entities must maintain oversight to ensure that contractors perform in accordance with the terms, conditions, and specifications of their contracts or purchase orders.? Furthermore, provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.320 ? Methods of Procurement to Be Followed provide guidance for procurement through small purchase procedures and state ?If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources?? Condition: A sample of 30 procurement transactions was randomly selected for testing using a non-statistical sampling approach. These transactions were reviewed to determine if appropriate internal controls were implemented and applicable compliance requirements were met. Though no problems were noted with the micro-purchase transactions tested, auditors encountered the significant issues in testing small purchase transactions; therefore, the entire population of small purchase transactions was ultimately tested. Upon review of these transactions, it was noted that the School District could not provide evidence that an adequate number of rate or price quotations was obtained from qualified sources for eight vendors associated with small purchase expenditures. Questioned Costs: Questioned costs of $72,747 were identified for all small purchase expenditures that did not follow the School District?s procurement procedures. Cause: In discussing the deficiencies with management, they stated that internal control procedures related to procurement were not being followed appropriately. In addition, management did not adequately monitor the procurement internal control procedures. Effect: The School District is not in compliance with the Uniform Guidance and GaDOE guidance. Failure to appropriately implement procedures to address procurement compliance requirements exposes the School District to unnecessary risk of error and misuse of Federal funds. In addition, this deficiency could lead to the return of grant funds associated with unallowable expenditures. Recommendation: The School District should evaluate and improve internal control procedures to ensure that required procurement procedures are followed, and appropriate documentation is obtained and retained on-file. In addition, management should develop a monitoring process to ensure that these procedures are operating effectively and as designed. Views of Responsible Officials: We concur with this finding.
FA 2022-001 Improve Controls over Procurement Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Internal Control Impact: Material Weakness Compliance Impact: Material Noncompliance Federal Awarding Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-Through Entity: Georgia Department of Education AL Numbers and Titles: 84.027 ? Special Education Grants to States COVID-19 ? 84.027 ? Special Education Grants to States 84.173 ? Special Education Preschool Grants COVID-19 ? 84.173 ? Special Education Preschool Grants Federal Award Numbers: H027A200073 (Year: 2021), H027A210073 (Year: 2022), H027X210073 (Year: 2022), H173A200081 (Year: 2021), H173A210081 (Year: 2022), H173X210081 (Year: 2022) Questioned Costs: $72,747 Description: A review of expenditures charged to the Special Education Cluster (Assistance Listing Numbers 84.027 and 84.173) revealed that the School District?s internal control procedures were not operating appropriately to ensure that the School District?s procurement procedures were followed. Background: The Special Education Cluster, which is comprised of the Special Education Grants to States (IDEA, Part B) and Special Education Preschool Grants (IDEA Preschool) programs, was created by the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). Special Education Cluster funding is available to ensure that all children with disabilities have available to them a free appropriate public education that emphasizes special education and related services designed to meet their unique needs and prepares them for further education, employment, and independent living; ensure that the rights of children with disabilities and their parents are protected; assist states, localities, educational service agencies, and federal agencies to provide for the education of all children with disabilities; and assess and ensure the effectiveness of efforts to educate children with disabilities. Special Education Cluster funding was granted to the Georgia Department of Education (GaDOE) by the U.S. Department of Education (ED). GaDOE is responsible for distributing funds to LEAs and overseeing the expenditure of funds by LEAs. Special Education Cluster funds totaling $1,381,680 were expended and reported on the Madison County Board of Education?s Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) for fiscal year 2022. Criteria: As a recipient of federal awards, the School District is required to establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance of managing the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal awards pursuant to Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), Section 200.303 ? Internal Controls. In addition, provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.318 ? General Procurement Standards state in part that ?(a) the non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and? (b) non-Federal entities must maintain oversight to ensure that contractors perform in accordance with the terms, conditions, and specifications of their contracts or purchase orders.? Furthermore, provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.320 ? Methods of Procurement to Be Followed provide guidance for procurement through small purchase procedures and state ?If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources?? Condition: A sample of 30 procurement transactions was randomly selected for testing using a non-statistical sampling approach. These transactions were reviewed to determine if appropriate internal controls were implemented and applicable compliance requirements were met. Though no problems were noted with the micro-purchase transactions tested, auditors encountered the significant issues in testing small purchase transactions; therefore, the entire population of small purchase transactions was ultimately tested. Upon review of these transactions, it was noted that the School District could not provide evidence that an adequate number of rate or price quotations was obtained from qualified sources for eight vendors associated with small purchase expenditures. Questioned Costs: Questioned costs of $72,747 were identified for all small purchase expenditures that did not follow the School District?s procurement procedures. Cause: In discussing the deficiencies with management, they stated that internal control procedures related to procurement were not being followed appropriately. In addition, management did not adequately monitor the procurement internal control procedures. Effect: The School District is not in compliance with the Uniform Guidance and GaDOE guidance. Failure to appropriately implement procedures to address procurement compliance requirements exposes the School District to unnecessary risk of error and misuse of Federal funds. In addition, this deficiency could lead to the return of grant funds associated with unallowable expenditures. Recommendation: The School District should evaluate and improve internal control procedures to ensure that required procurement procedures are followed, and appropriate documentation is obtained and retained on-file. In addition, management should develop a monitoring process to ensure that these procedures are operating effectively and as designed. Views of Responsible Officials: We concur with this finding.
FA 2022-001 Improve Controls over Procurement Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Internal Control Impact: Material Weakness Compliance Impact: Material Noncompliance Federal Awarding Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-Through Entity: Georgia Department of Education AL Numbers and Titles: 84.027 ? Special Education Grants to States COVID-19 ? 84.027 ? Special Education Grants to States 84.173 ? Special Education Preschool Grants COVID-19 ? 84.173 ? Special Education Preschool Grants Federal Award Numbers: H027A200073 (Year: 2021), H027A210073 (Year: 2022), H027X210073 (Year: 2022), H173A200081 (Year: 2021), H173A210081 (Year: 2022), H173X210081 (Year: 2022) Questioned Costs: $72,747 Description: A review of expenditures charged to the Special Education Cluster (Assistance Listing Numbers 84.027 and 84.173) revealed that the School District?s internal control procedures were not operating appropriately to ensure that the School District?s procurement procedures were followed. Background: The Special Education Cluster, which is comprised of the Special Education Grants to States (IDEA, Part B) and Special Education Preschool Grants (IDEA Preschool) programs, was created by the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). Special Education Cluster funding is available to ensure that all children with disabilities have available to them a free appropriate public education that emphasizes special education and related services designed to meet their unique needs and prepares them for further education, employment, and independent living; ensure that the rights of children with disabilities and their parents are protected; assist states, localities, educational service agencies, and federal agencies to provide for the education of all children with disabilities; and assess and ensure the effectiveness of efforts to educate children with disabilities. Special Education Cluster funding was granted to the Georgia Department of Education (GaDOE) by the U.S. Department of Education (ED). GaDOE is responsible for distributing funds to LEAs and overseeing the expenditure of funds by LEAs. Special Education Cluster funds totaling $1,381,680 were expended and reported on the Madison County Board of Education?s Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) for fiscal year 2022. Criteria: As a recipient of federal awards, the School District is required to establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance of managing the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal awards pursuant to Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), Section 200.303 ? Internal Controls. In addition, provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.318 ? General Procurement Standards state in part that ?(a) the non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and? (b) non-Federal entities must maintain oversight to ensure that contractors perform in accordance with the terms, conditions, and specifications of their contracts or purchase orders.? Furthermore, provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.320 ? Methods of Procurement to Be Followed provide guidance for procurement through small purchase procedures and state ?If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources?? Condition: A sample of 30 procurement transactions was randomly selected for testing using a non-statistical sampling approach. These transactions were reviewed to determine if appropriate internal controls were implemented and applicable compliance requirements were met. Though no problems were noted with the micro-purchase transactions tested, auditors encountered the significant issues in testing small purchase transactions; therefore, the entire population of small purchase transactions was ultimately tested. Upon review of these transactions, it was noted that the School District could not provide evidence that an adequate number of rate or price quotations was obtained from qualified sources for eight vendors associated with small purchase expenditures. Questioned Costs: Questioned costs of $72,747 were identified for all small purchase expenditures that did not follow the School District?s procurement procedures. Cause: In discussing the deficiencies with management, they stated that internal control procedures related to procurement were not being followed appropriately. In addition, management did not adequately monitor the procurement internal control procedures. Effect: The School District is not in compliance with the Uniform Guidance and GaDOE guidance. Failure to appropriately implement procedures to address procurement compliance requirements exposes the School District to unnecessary risk of error and misuse of Federal funds. In addition, this deficiency could lead to the return of grant funds associated with unallowable expenditures. Recommendation: The School District should evaluate and improve internal control procedures to ensure that required procurement procedures are followed, and appropriate documentation is obtained and retained on-file. In addition, management should develop a monitoring process to ensure that these procedures are operating effectively and as designed. Views of Responsible Officials: We concur with this finding.
FA 2022-001 Improve Controls over Procurement Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Internal Control Impact: Material Weakness Compliance Impact: Material Noncompliance Federal Awarding Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-Through Entity: Georgia Department of Education AL Numbers and Titles: 84.027 ? Special Education Grants to States COVID-19 ? 84.027 ? Special Education Grants to States 84.173 ? Special Education Preschool Grants COVID-19 ? 84.173 ? Special Education Preschool Grants Federal Award Numbers: H027A200073 (Year: 2021), H027A210073 (Year: 2022), H027X210073 (Year: 2022), H173A200081 (Year: 2021), H173A210081 (Year: 2022), H173X210081 (Year: 2022) Questioned Costs: $72,747 Description: A review of expenditures charged to the Special Education Cluster (Assistance Listing Numbers 84.027 and 84.173) revealed that the School District?s internal control procedures were not operating appropriately to ensure that the School District?s procurement procedures were followed. Background: The Special Education Cluster, which is comprised of the Special Education Grants to States (IDEA, Part B) and Special Education Preschool Grants (IDEA Preschool) programs, was created by the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). Special Education Cluster funding is available to ensure that all children with disabilities have available to them a free appropriate public education that emphasizes special education and related services designed to meet their unique needs and prepares them for further education, employment, and independent living; ensure that the rights of children with disabilities and their parents are protected; assist states, localities, educational service agencies, and federal agencies to provide for the education of all children with disabilities; and assess and ensure the effectiveness of efforts to educate children with disabilities. Special Education Cluster funding was granted to the Georgia Department of Education (GaDOE) by the U.S. Department of Education (ED). GaDOE is responsible for distributing funds to LEAs and overseeing the expenditure of funds by LEAs. Special Education Cluster funds totaling $1,381,680 were expended and reported on the Madison County Board of Education?s Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) for fiscal year 2022. Criteria: As a recipient of federal awards, the School District is required to establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance of managing the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal awards pursuant to Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), Section 200.303 ? Internal Controls. In addition, provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.318 ? General Procurement Standards state in part that ?(a) the non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and? (b) non-Federal entities must maintain oversight to ensure that contractors perform in accordance with the terms, conditions, and specifications of their contracts or purchase orders.? Furthermore, provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.320 ? Methods of Procurement to Be Followed provide guidance for procurement through small purchase procedures and state ?If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources?? Condition: A sample of 30 procurement transactions was randomly selected for testing using a non-statistical sampling approach. These transactions were reviewed to determine if appropriate internal controls were implemented and applicable compliance requirements were met. Though no problems were noted with the micro-purchase transactions tested, auditors encountered the significant issues in testing small purchase transactions; therefore, the entire population of small purchase transactions was ultimately tested. Upon review of these transactions, it was noted that the School District could not provide evidence that an adequate number of rate or price quotations was obtained from qualified sources for eight vendors associated with small purchase expenditures. Questioned Costs: Questioned costs of $72,747 were identified for all small purchase expenditures that did not follow the School District?s procurement procedures. Cause: In discussing the deficiencies with management, they stated that internal control procedures related to procurement were not being followed appropriately. In addition, management did not adequately monitor the procurement internal control procedures. Effect: The School District is not in compliance with the Uniform Guidance and GaDOE guidance. Failure to appropriately implement procedures to address procurement compliance requirements exposes the School District to unnecessary risk of error and misuse of Federal funds. In addition, this deficiency could lead to the return of grant funds associated with unallowable expenditures. Recommendation: The School District should evaluate and improve internal control procedures to ensure that required procurement procedures are followed, and appropriate documentation is obtained and retained on-file. In addition, management should develop a monitoring process to ensure that these procedures are operating effectively and as designed. Views of Responsible Officials: We concur with this finding.
FINDING 2022-003 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, COVID-19 - School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, COVID-19 - National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children, COVID-19 - Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 20-21, FY 21/22 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 19 METROPOLITAN SCHOOL DISTRICT OF WARREN COUNTY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not designed, nor implemented at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Procurement The School Corporation had not designed or implemented adequate policies or procedures to ensure that proper procurement procedures for small purchases were followed. There was no oversight, review, or approval process in place and documented at the School Corporation to ensure proper procedures were followed and price or rate quotations were obtained. Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $150,000 per Indiana Code. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. The School Corporation did not obtain price or rate quotes for three vendors tested that were less than the simplified acquisition threshold of $150,000 but exceeded the $10,000 micropurchase threshold. Documentation detailing the history of procurement, which must include the reason for the procurement method used, was not available for audit. In addition, contracts were not awarded for the two vendors tested in fiscal year 2020-2021 with purchases exceeding $50,000. Suspension and Debarment The School Corporation had not designed or implemented adequate policies or procedures to ensure that applicable vendors who received federal funds were not suspended or debarred from participating in federal awards programs. Nonfederal entities and contractors are subject to non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations. These regulations restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or are ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. This is done by checking SAM Exclusions, collecting a certification from that person, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. There were three vendors subject to suspension and debarment requirements during the audit period. The School Corporation did not perform procedures to ensure the vendors were not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from or eligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 20 METROPOLITAN SCHOOL DISTRICT OF WARREN COUNTY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(i) states: "The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price." 2 CFR 200.320(b) (Uniform Guidance) states: "Procurement by small purchase procedures. Small purchase procedures are those relatively simple and informal procurement methods for securing services, supplies, or other property that do not cost more than the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources." 2 CFR 200.320 (Revised Uniform Guidance) states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use document procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and ?? 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in ? 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases - (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 21 METROPOLITAN SCHOOL DISTRICT OF WARREN COUNTY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Indiana Code 5-22-8-3 states in part: "(a) This section applies only if the purchasing agent expects the purchase to be: (1) at least fifty thousand dollars ($50,000); and (2) not more than one hundred fifty thousand dollars ($150,000). . . . (d) If the purchasing agent receives a satisfactory quote, the purchasing agent shall award a contract to the lowest responsible and responsive offeror for each line or class of supplies required." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause Management had not developed nor implemented an effective system of internal controls to ensure compliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Effect The failure to establish an effective internal control system enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure compliance and comply with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-003 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, COVID-19 - School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, COVID-19 - National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children, COVID-19 - Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 20-21, FY 21/22 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 19 METROPOLITAN SCHOOL DISTRICT OF WARREN COUNTY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not designed, nor implemented at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Procurement The School Corporation had not designed or implemented adequate policies or procedures to ensure that proper procurement procedures for small purchases were followed. There was no oversight, review, or approval process in place and documented at the School Corporation to ensure proper procedures were followed and price or rate quotations were obtained. Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $150,000 per Indiana Code. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. The School Corporation did not obtain price or rate quotes for three vendors tested that were less than the simplified acquisition threshold of $150,000 but exceeded the $10,000 micropurchase threshold. Documentation detailing the history of procurement, which must include the reason for the procurement method used, was not available for audit. In addition, contracts were not awarded for the two vendors tested in fiscal year 2020-2021 with purchases exceeding $50,000. Suspension and Debarment The School Corporation had not designed or implemented adequate policies or procedures to ensure that applicable vendors who received federal funds were not suspended or debarred from participating in federal awards programs. Nonfederal entities and contractors are subject to non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations. These regulations restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or are ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. This is done by checking SAM Exclusions, collecting a certification from that person, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. There were three vendors subject to suspension and debarment requirements during the audit period. The School Corporation did not perform procedures to ensure the vendors were not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from or eligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 20 METROPOLITAN SCHOOL DISTRICT OF WARREN COUNTY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(i) states: "The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price." 2 CFR 200.320(b) (Uniform Guidance) states: "Procurement by small purchase procedures. Small purchase procedures are those relatively simple and informal procurement methods for securing services, supplies, or other property that do not cost more than the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources." 2 CFR 200.320 (Revised Uniform Guidance) states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use document procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and ?? 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in ? 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases - (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 21 METROPOLITAN SCHOOL DISTRICT OF WARREN COUNTY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Indiana Code 5-22-8-3 states in part: "(a) This section applies only if the purchasing agent expects the purchase to be: (1) at least fifty thousand dollars ($50,000); and (2) not more than one hundred fifty thousand dollars ($150,000). . . . (d) If the purchasing agent receives a satisfactory quote, the purchasing agent shall award a contract to the lowest responsible and responsive offeror for each line or class of supplies required." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause Management had not developed nor implemented an effective system of internal controls to ensure compliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Effect The failure to establish an effective internal control system enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure compliance and comply with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-003 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, COVID-19 - School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, COVID-19 - National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children, COVID-19 - Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 20-21, FY 21/22 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 19 METROPOLITAN SCHOOL DISTRICT OF WARREN COUNTY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not designed, nor implemented at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Procurement The School Corporation had not designed or implemented adequate policies or procedures to ensure that proper procurement procedures for small purchases were followed. There was no oversight, review, or approval process in place and documented at the School Corporation to ensure proper procedures were followed and price or rate quotations were obtained. Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $150,000 per Indiana Code. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. The School Corporation did not obtain price or rate quotes for three vendors tested that were less than the simplified acquisition threshold of $150,000 but exceeded the $10,000 micropurchase threshold. Documentation detailing the history of procurement, which must include the reason for the procurement method used, was not available for audit. In addition, contracts were not awarded for the two vendors tested in fiscal year 2020-2021 with purchases exceeding $50,000. Suspension and Debarment The School Corporation had not designed or implemented adequate policies or procedures to ensure that applicable vendors who received federal funds were not suspended or debarred from participating in federal awards programs. Nonfederal entities and contractors are subject to non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations. These regulations restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or are ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. This is done by checking SAM Exclusions, collecting a certification from that person, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. There were three vendors subject to suspension and debarment requirements during the audit period. The School Corporation did not perform procedures to ensure the vendors were not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from or eligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 20 METROPOLITAN SCHOOL DISTRICT OF WARREN COUNTY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(i) states: "The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price." 2 CFR 200.320(b) (Uniform Guidance) states: "Procurement by small purchase procedures. Small purchase procedures are those relatively simple and informal procurement methods for securing services, supplies, or other property that do not cost more than the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources." 2 CFR 200.320 (Revised Uniform Guidance) states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use document procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and ?? 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in ? 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases - (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 21 METROPOLITAN SCHOOL DISTRICT OF WARREN COUNTY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Indiana Code 5-22-8-3 states in part: "(a) This section applies only if the purchasing agent expects the purchase to be: (1) at least fifty thousand dollars ($50,000); and (2) not more than one hundred fifty thousand dollars ($150,000). . . . (d) If the purchasing agent receives a satisfactory quote, the purchasing agent shall award a contract to the lowest responsible and responsive offeror for each line or class of supplies required." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause Management had not developed nor implemented an effective system of internal controls to ensure compliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Effect The failure to establish an effective internal control system enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure compliance and comply with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-003 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, COVID-19 - School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, COVID-19 - National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children, COVID-19 - Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 20-21, FY 21/22 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 19 METROPOLITAN SCHOOL DISTRICT OF WARREN COUNTY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not designed, nor implemented at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Procurement The School Corporation had not designed or implemented adequate policies or procedures to ensure that proper procurement procedures for small purchases were followed. There was no oversight, review, or approval process in place and documented at the School Corporation to ensure proper procedures were followed and price or rate quotations were obtained. Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $150,000 per Indiana Code. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. The School Corporation did not obtain price or rate quotes for three vendors tested that were less than the simplified acquisition threshold of $150,000 but exceeded the $10,000 micropurchase threshold. Documentation detailing the history of procurement, which must include the reason for the procurement method used, was not available for audit. In addition, contracts were not awarded for the two vendors tested in fiscal year 2020-2021 with purchases exceeding $50,000. Suspension and Debarment The School Corporation had not designed or implemented adequate policies or procedures to ensure that applicable vendors who received federal funds were not suspended or debarred from participating in federal awards programs. Nonfederal entities and contractors are subject to non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations. These regulations restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or are ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. This is done by checking SAM Exclusions, collecting a certification from that person, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. There were three vendors subject to suspension and debarment requirements during the audit period. The School Corporation did not perform procedures to ensure the vendors were not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from or eligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 20 METROPOLITAN SCHOOL DISTRICT OF WARREN COUNTY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(i) states: "The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price." 2 CFR 200.320(b) (Uniform Guidance) states: "Procurement by small purchase procedures. Small purchase procedures are those relatively simple and informal procurement methods for securing services, supplies, or other property that do not cost more than the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources." 2 CFR 200.320 (Revised Uniform Guidance) states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use document procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and ?? 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in ? 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases - (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 21 METROPOLITAN SCHOOL DISTRICT OF WARREN COUNTY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Indiana Code 5-22-8-3 states in part: "(a) This section applies only if the purchasing agent expects the purchase to be: (1) at least fifty thousand dollars ($50,000); and (2) not more than one hundred fifty thousand dollars ($150,000). . . . (d) If the purchasing agent receives a satisfactory quote, the purchasing agent shall award a contract to the lowest responsible and responsive offeror for each line or class of supplies required." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause Management had not developed nor implemented an effective system of internal controls to ensure compliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Effect The failure to establish an effective internal control system enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure compliance and comply with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-003 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, COVID-19 - School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, COVID-19 - National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children, COVID-19 - Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 20-21, FY 21/22 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 19 METROPOLITAN SCHOOL DISTRICT OF WARREN COUNTY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not designed, nor implemented at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Procurement The School Corporation had not designed or implemented adequate policies or procedures to ensure that proper procurement procedures for small purchases were followed. There was no oversight, review, or approval process in place and documented at the School Corporation to ensure proper procedures were followed and price or rate quotations were obtained. Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $150,000 per Indiana Code. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. The School Corporation did not obtain price or rate quotes for three vendors tested that were less than the simplified acquisition threshold of $150,000 but exceeded the $10,000 micropurchase threshold. Documentation detailing the history of procurement, which must include the reason for the procurement method used, was not available for audit. In addition, contracts were not awarded for the two vendors tested in fiscal year 2020-2021 with purchases exceeding $50,000. Suspension and Debarment The School Corporation had not designed or implemented adequate policies or procedures to ensure that applicable vendors who received federal funds were not suspended or debarred from participating in federal awards programs. Nonfederal entities and contractors are subject to non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations. These regulations restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or are ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. This is done by checking SAM Exclusions, collecting a certification from that person, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. There were three vendors subject to suspension and debarment requirements during the audit period. The School Corporation did not perform procedures to ensure the vendors were not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from or eligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 20 METROPOLITAN SCHOOL DISTRICT OF WARREN COUNTY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(i) states: "The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price." 2 CFR 200.320(b) (Uniform Guidance) states: "Procurement by small purchase procedures. Small purchase procedures are those relatively simple and informal procurement methods for securing services, supplies, or other property that do not cost more than the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources." 2 CFR 200.320 (Revised Uniform Guidance) states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use document procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and ?? 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in ? 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases - (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 21 METROPOLITAN SCHOOL DISTRICT OF WARREN COUNTY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Indiana Code 5-22-8-3 states in part: "(a) This section applies only if the purchasing agent expects the purchase to be: (1) at least fifty thousand dollars ($50,000); and (2) not more than one hundred fifty thousand dollars ($150,000). . . . (d) If the purchasing agent receives a satisfactory quote, the purchasing agent shall award a contract to the lowest responsible and responsive offeror for each line or class of supplies required." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause Management had not developed nor implemented an effective system of internal controls to ensure compliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Effect The failure to establish an effective internal control system enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure compliance and comply with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-003 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, COVID-19 - School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, COVID-19 - National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children, COVID-19 - Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 20-21, FY 21/22 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 19 METROPOLITAN SCHOOL DISTRICT OF WARREN COUNTY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not designed, nor implemented at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Procurement The School Corporation had not designed or implemented adequate policies or procedures to ensure that proper procurement procedures for small purchases were followed. There was no oversight, review, or approval process in place and documented at the School Corporation to ensure proper procedures were followed and price or rate quotations were obtained. Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $150,000 per Indiana Code. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. The School Corporation did not obtain price or rate quotes for three vendors tested that were less than the simplified acquisition threshold of $150,000 but exceeded the $10,000 micropurchase threshold. Documentation detailing the history of procurement, which must include the reason for the procurement method used, was not available for audit. In addition, contracts were not awarded for the two vendors tested in fiscal year 2020-2021 with purchases exceeding $50,000. Suspension and Debarment The School Corporation had not designed or implemented adequate policies or procedures to ensure that applicable vendors who received federal funds were not suspended or debarred from participating in federal awards programs. Nonfederal entities and contractors are subject to non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations. These regulations restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or are ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. This is done by checking SAM Exclusions, collecting a certification from that person, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. There were three vendors subject to suspension and debarment requirements during the audit period. The School Corporation did not perform procedures to ensure the vendors were not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from or eligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 20 METROPOLITAN SCHOOL DISTRICT OF WARREN COUNTY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(i) states: "The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price." 2 CFR 200.320(b) (Uniform Guidance) states: "Procurement by small purchase procedures. Small purchase procedures are those relatively simple and informal procurement methods for securing services, supplies, or other property that do not cost more than the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources." 2 CFR 200.320 (Revised Uniform Guidance) states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use document procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and ?? 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in ? 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases - (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 21 METROPOLITAN SCHOOL DISTRICT OF WARREN COUNTY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Indiana Code 5-22-8-3 states in part: "(a) This section applies only if the purchasing agent expects the purchase to be: (1) at least fifty thousand dollars ($50,000); and (2) not more than one hundred fifty thousand dollars ($150,000). . . . (d) If the purchasing agent receives a satisfactory quote, the purchasing agent shall award a contract to the lowest responsible and responsive offeror for each line or class of supplies required." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause Management had not developed nor implemented an effective system of internal controls to ensure compliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Effect The failure to establish an effective internal control system enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure compliance and comply with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-003 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, COVID-19 - School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, COVID-19 - National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children, COVID-19 - Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 20-21, FY 21/22 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 19 METROPOLITAN SCHOOL DISTRICT OF WARREN COUNTY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not designed, nor implemented at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Procurement The School Corporation had not designed or implemented adequate policies or procedures to ensure that proper procurement procedures for small purchases were followed. There was no oversight, review, or approval process in place and documented at the School Corporation to ensure proper procedures were followed and price or rate quotations were obtained. Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $150,000 per Indiana Code. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. The School Corporation did not obtain price or rate quotes for three vendors tested that were less than the simplified acquisition threshold of $150,000 but exceeded the $10,000 micropurchase threshold. Documentation detailing the history of procurement, which must include the reason for the procurement method used, was not available for audit. In addition, contracts were not awarded for the two vendors tested in fiscal year 2020-2021 with purchases exceeding $50,000. Suspension and Debarment The School Corporation had not designed or implemented adequate policies or procedures to ensure that applicable vendors who received federal funds were not suspended or debarred from participating in federal awards programs. Nonfederal entities and contractors are subject to non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations. These regulations restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or are ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. This is done by checking SAM Exclusions, collecting a certification from that person, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. There were three vendors subject to suspension and debarment requirements during the audit period. The School Corporation did not perform procedures to ensure the vendors were not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from or eligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 20 METROPOLITAN SCHOOL DISTRICT OF WARREN COUNTY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(i) states: "The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price." 2 CFR 200.320(b) (Uniform Guidance) states: "Procurement by small purchase procedures. Small purchase procedures are those relatively simple and informal procurement methods for securing services, supplies, or other property that do not cost more than the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources." 2 CFR 200.320 (Revised Uniform Guidance) states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use document procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and ?? 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in ? 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases - (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 21 METROPOLITAN SCHOOL DISTRICT OF WARREN COUNTY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Indiana Code 5-22-8-3 states in part: "(a) This section applies only if the purchasing agent expects the purchase to be: (1) at least fifty thousand dollars ($50,000); and (2) not more than one hundred fifty thousand dollars ($150,000). . . . (d) If the purchasing agent receives a satisfactory quote, the purchasing agent shall award a contract to the lowest responsible and responsive offeror for each line or class of supplies required." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause Management had not developed nor implemented an effective system of internal controls to ensure compliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Effect The failure to establish an effective internal control system enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure compliance and comply with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-003 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, COVID-19 - School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, COVID-19 - National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children, COVID-19 - Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 20-21, FY 21/22 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 19 METROPOLITAN SCHOOL DISTRICT OF WARREN COUNTY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not designed, nor implemented at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Procurement The School Corporation had not designed or implemented adequate policies or procedures to ensure that proper procurement procedures for small purchases were followed. There was no oversight, review, or approval process in place and documented at the School Corporation to ensure proper procedures were followed and price or rate quotations were obtained. Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $150,000 per Indiana Code. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. The School Corporation did not obtain price or rate quotes for three vendors tested that were less than the simplified acquisition threshold of $150,000 but exceeded the $10,000 micropurchase threshold. Documentation detailing the history of procurement, which must include the reason for the procurement method used, was not available for audit. In addition, contracts were not awarded for the two vendors tested in fiscal year 2020-2021 with purchases exceeding $50,000. Suspension and Debarment The School Corporation had not designed or implemented adequate policies or procedures to ensure that applicable vendors who received federal funds were not suspended or debarred from participating in federal awards programs. Nonfederal entities and contractors are subject to non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations. These regulations restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or are ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. This is done by checking SAM Exclusions, collecting a certification from that person, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. There were three vendors subject to suspension and debarment requirements during the audit period. The School Corporation did not perform procedures to ensure the vendors were not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from or eligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 20 METROPOLITAN SCHOOL DISTRICT OF WARREN COUNTY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(i) states: "The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price." 2 CFR 200.320(b) (Uniform Guidance) states: "Procurement by small purchase procedures. Small purchase procedures are those relatively simple and informal procurement methods for securing services, supplies, or other property that do not cost more than the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources." 2 CFR 200.320 (Revised Uniform Guidance) states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use document procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and ?? 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in ? 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases - (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 21 METROPOLITAN SCHOOL DISTRICT OF WARREN COUNTY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Indiana Code 5-22-8-3 states in part: "(a) This section applies only if the purchasing agent expects the purchase to be: (1) at least fifty thousand dollars ($50,000); and (2) not more than one hundred fifty thousand dollars ($150,000). . . . (d) If the purchasing agent receives a satisfactory quote, the purchasing agent shall award a contract to the lowest responsible and responsive offeror for each line or class of supplies required." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause Management had not developed nor implemented an effective system of internal controls to ensure compliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Effect The failure to establish an effective internal control system enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure compliance and comply with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
2 CFR ? 3474.1 provides the Department of Education (DOE) adopts the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Guidance in 2 CFR part 200. Thus, this section gives regulatory effect to the OMB guidance and supplements the guidance as needed for the DOE, except as otherwise noted in that section. 2 CFR ?200.320(b) states in part that when the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal financial assistance award exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require following documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a non-competitive procurement can be used in accordance with ? 200.319 or paragraph (c) of this section. 2 CFR ? 200.318(e) states to foster greater economy and efficiency, and in accordance with efforts to promote cost-effective use of shared services across the Federal Government, the non-Federal entity is encouraged to enter into state and local intergovernmental agreements or inter-entity agreements where appropriate for procurement or use of common or shared goods and services. Competition requirements will be met with documented procurement actions using strategic sourcing, shared services, and other similar procurement arrangements. Ohio Rev. Code ? 167.081, states that a regional council may enter into a unit price contract for materials, labor, services, overhead, profit, and associated expenses for the repair, enlargement, improvement, or demolition of a building or structure if the contract is awarded pursuant to a competitive bidding procedure of a county, municipal corporation, or township or a special district, school district, or other political subdivision that is a council member. A political subdivision that is a member of a regional council may participate in a contract entered into under Ohio Rev. Code ? 167.081. Purchases under a contract entered into under Ohio Rev. Code ? 167.081 are exempt from any competitive selection or bidding requirements otherwise required by law. The School District participated in The Ohio Purchasing Council?s unit price contract with Prodigy Building Solutions, LLC., for the School District's roofing, HVAC, and lighting project, pursuant to Ohio Rev. Code ? 167.081. The School District utilized ESSER grant funds for part of this project. The School District did not maintain documentation that the Ohio Purchasing Council followed competitive bidding procedures of a council member pursuant to Ohio Rev. Code ?. 167.081 when awarding the unit price contract to Prodigy Building Solutions, LLC. and therefore failed to meet the documentation requirements of 2 CFR ? 200.320(b) and 2 CFR ? 200.318(e) noted above. Failure to comply with the applicable Uniform Guidance requirements and the Ohio Revised Code could result in further citations for the School District and potential loss of grant funding. The School District should review the applicable Uniform Guidance requirements and the Ohio Revised Code before entering into any contracts.
2 CFR ? 3474.1 provides the Department of Education (DOE) adopts the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Guidance in 2 CFR part 200. Thus, this section gives regulatory effect to the OMB guidance and supplements the guidance as needed for the DOE, except as otherwise noted in that section. 2 CFR ?200.320(b) states in part that when the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal financial assistance award exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require following documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a non-competitive procurement can be used in accordance with ? 200.319 or paragraph (c) of this section. 2 CFR ? 200.318(e) states to foster greater economy and efficiency, and in accordance with efforts to promote cost-effective use of shared services across the Federal Government, the non-Federal entity is encouraged to enter into state and local intergovernmental agreements or inter-entity agreements where appropriate for procurement or use of common or shared goods and services. Competition requirements will be met with documented procurement actions using strategic sourcing, shared services, and other similar procurement arrangements. Ohio Rev. Code ? 167.081, states that a regional council may enter into a unit price contract for materials, labor, services, overhead, profit, and associated expenses for the repair, enlargement, improvement, or demolition of a building or structure if the contract is awarded pursuant to a competitive bidding procedure of a county, municipal corporation, or township or a special district, school district, or other political subdivision that is a council member. A political subdivision that is a member of a regional council may participate in a contract entered into under Ohio Rev. Code ? 167.081. Purchases under a contract entered into under Ohio Rev. Code ? 167.081 are exempt from any competitive selection or bidding requirements otherwise required by law. The School District participated in The Ohio Purchasing Council?s unit price contract with Prodigy Building Solutions, LLC., for the School District's roofing, HVAC, and lighting project, pursuant to Ohio Rev. Code ? 167.081. The School District utilized ESSER grant funds for part of this project. The School District did not maintain documentation that the Ohio Purchasing Council followed competitive bidding procedures of a council member pursuant to Ohio Rev. Code ?. 167.081 when awarding the unit price contract to Prodigy Building Solutions, LLC. and therefore failed to meet the documentation requirements of 2 CFR ? 200.320(b) and 2 CFR ? 200.318(e) noted above. Failure to comply with the applicable Uniform Guidance requirements and the Ohio Revised Code could result in further citations for the School District and potential loss of grant funding. The School District should review the applicable Uniform Guidance requirements and the Ohio Revised Code before entering into any contracts.
2 CFR ? 3474.1 provides the Department of Education (DOE) adopts the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Guidance in 2 CFR part 200. Thus, this section gives regulatory effect to the OMB guidance and supplements the guidance as needed for the DOE, except as otherwise noted in that section. 2 CFR ?200.320(b) states in part that when the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal financial assistance award exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require following documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a non-competitive procurement can be used in accordance with ? 200.319 or paragraph (c) of this section. 2 CFR ? 200.318(e) states to foster greater economy and efficiency, and in accordance with efforts to promote cost-effective use of shared services across the Federal Government, the non-Federal entity is encouraged to enter into state and local intergovernmental agreements or inter-entity agreements where appropriate for procurement or use of common or shared goods and services. Competition requirements will be met with documented procurement actions using strategic sourcing, shared services, and other similar procurement arrangements. Ohio Rev. Code ? 167.081, states that a regional council may enter into a unit price contract for materials, labor, services, overhead, profit, and associated expenses for the repair, enlargement, improvement, or demolition of a building or structure if the contract is awarded pursuant to a competitive bidding procedure of a county, municipal corporation, or township or a special district, school district, or other political subdivision that is a council member. A political subdivision that is a member of a regional council may participate in a contract entered into under Ohio Rev. Code ? 167.081. Purchases under a contract entered into under Ohio Rev. Code ? 167.081 are exempt from any competitive selection or bidding requirements otherwise required by law. The School District participated in The Ohio Purchasing Council?s unit price contract with Prodigy Building Solutions, LLC., for the School District's roofing, HVAC, and lighting project, pursuant to Ohio Rev. Code ? 167.081. The School District utilized ESSER grant funds for part of this project. The School District did not maintain documentation that the Ohio Purchasing Council followed competitive bidding procedures of a council member pursuant to Ohio Rev. Code ?. 167.081 when awarding the unit price contract to Prodigy Building Solutions, LLC. and therefore failed to meet the documentation requirements of 2 CFR ? 200.320(b) and 2 CFR ? 200.318(e) noted above. Failure to comply with the applicable Uniform Guidance requirements and the Ohio Revised Code could result in further citations for the School District and potential loss of grant funding. The School District should review the applicable Uniform Guidance requirements and the Ohio Revised Code before entering into any contracts.
FINDING 2022-002 ? Questioned Costs Related to Procurement Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Communications Commission Program: COVID-19 Education Stabilization Fund (ESF): 84.425 COVID-19 Telehealth Program: 32.006 Criteria: In accordance with Uniform Guidance procurement requirements found in 2 CFR Part 200.318 through 200.237, the School District is required to ensure that procurement methods used for purchases are appropriate based on the dollar amount of the purchase. Recipients of federal awards should have internal controls in place to ensure procurement practices are consistent and appropriate. Policies should dictate the method of procurement that should be used, who is authorized to approve purchases, and what procurement documentation and information should be maintained. The policy should also explain which items are eligible for non-competitive procurement (i.e., available only from a single source, public emergency, expressly authorized by awarding or pass-through agency, or if competitive procurement results are deemed inadequate). Condition: The School District did not adequately document its analysis that its technology purchases for the ESF and the Telehealth Program qualified for non-competitive procurement for being available through a single source. As a result, the School District did not have documentation to provide evidence of compliance which resulted in questioned costs. Cause: The School District did not have a formal procedure in place to adequately document the procurement procedures that were used. Effect: The School District was not in compliance with the procurement requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs: $1,001,167 based on the technology equipment invoice applied to the ESF and $499,768 based on the technology equipment invoice applied to the Telehealth Program. Recommendation: We recommend that the School District ensures that their purchasing policy formally reflects the procurement requirements in the Uniform Guidance. We recommend that the School District establish procedures to ensure that their purchasing policy is followed, including the use of competitive bids or proposals, when appropriate. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The School District agrees with the recommendation. See separate Corrective Action Plan.
FINDING 2022-002 ? Questioned Costs Related to Procurement Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Communications Commission Program: COVID-19 Education Stabilization Fund (ESF): 84.425 COVID-19 Telehealth Program: 32.006 Criteria: In accordance with Uniform Guidance procurement requirements found in 2 CFR Part 200.318 through 200.237, the School District is required to ensure that procurement methods used for purchases are appropriate based on the dollar amount of the purchase. Recipients of federal awards should have internal controls in place to ensure procurement practices are consistent and appropriate. Policies should dictate the method of procurement that should be used, who is authorized to approve purchases, and what procurement documentation and information should be maintained. The policy should also explain which items are eligible for non-competitive procurement (i.e., available only from a single source, public emergency, expressly authorized by awarding or pass-through agency, or if competitive procurement results are deemed inadequate). Condition: The School District did not adequately document its analysis that its technology purchases for the ESF and the Telehealth Program qualified for non-competitive procurement for being available through a single source. As a result, the School District did not have documentation to provide evidence of compliance which resulted in questioned costs. Cause: The School District did not have a formal procedure in place to adequately document the procurement procedures that were used. Effect: The School District was not in compliance with the procurement requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs: $1,001,167 based on the technology equipment invoice applied to the ESF and $499,768 based on the technology equipment invoice applied to the Telehealth Program. Recommendation: We recommend that the School District ensures that their purchasing policy formally reflects the procurement requirements in the Uniform Guidance. We recommend that the School District establish procedures to ensure that their purchasing policy is followed, including the use of competitive bids or proposals, when appropriate. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The School District agrees with the recommendation. See separate Corrective Action Plan.
FINDING 2022-002 ? Questioned Costs Related to Procurement Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Communications Commission Program: COVID-19 Education Stabilization Fund (ESF): 84.425 COVID-19 Telehealth Program: 32.006 Criteria: In accordance with Uniform Guidance procurement requirements found in 2 CFR Part 200.318 through 200.237, the School District is required to ensure that procurement methods used for purchases are appropriate based on the dollar amount of the purchase. Recipients of federal awards should have internal controls in place to ensure procurement practices are consistent and appropriate. Policies should dictate the method of procurement that should be used, who is authorized to approve purchases, and what procurement documentation and information should be maintained. The policy should also explain which items are eligible for non-competitive procurement (i.e., available only from a single source, public emergency, expressly authorized by awarding or pass-through agency, or if competitive procurement results are deemed inadequate). Condition: The School District did not adequately document its analysis that its technology purchases for the ESF and the Telehealth Program qualified for non-competitive procurement for being available through a single source. As a result, the School District did not have documentation to provide evidence of compliance which resulted in questioned costs. Cause: The School District did not have a formal procedure in place to adequately document the procurement procedures that were used. Effect: The School District was not in compliance with the procurement requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs: $1,001,167 based on the technology equipment invoice applied to the ESF and $499,768 based on the technology equipment invoice applied to the Telehealth Program. Recommendation: We recommend that the School District ensures that their purchasing policy formally reflects the procurement requirements in the Uniform Guidance. We recommend that the School District establish procedures to ensure that their purchasing policy is followed, including the use of competitive bids or proposals, when appropriate. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The School District agrees with the recommendation. See separate Corrective Action Plan.
FINDING 2022-002 ? Questioned Costs Related to Procurement Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Communications Commission Program: COVID-19 Education Stabilization Fund (ESF): 84.425 COVID-19 Telehealth Program: 32.006 Criteria: In accordance with Uniform Guidance procurement requirements found in 2 CFR Part 200.318 through 200.237, the School District is required to ensure that procurement methods used for purchases are appropriate based on the dollar amount of the purchase. Recipients of federal awards should have internal controls in place to ensure procurement practices are consistent and appropriate. Policies should dictate the method of procurement that should be used, who is authorized to approve purchases, and what procurement documentation and information should be maintained. The policy should also explain which items are eligible for non-competitive procurement (i.e., available only from a single source, public emergency, expressly authorized by awarding or pass-through agency, or if competitive procurement results are deemed inadequate). Condition: The School District did not adequately document its analysis that its technology purchases for the ESF and the Telehealth Program qualified for non-competitive procurement for being available through a single source. As a result, the School District did not have documentation to provide evidence of compliance which resulted in questioned costs. Cause: The School District did not have a formal procedure in place to adequately document the procurement procedures that were used. Effect: The School District was not in compliance with the procurement requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs: $1,001,167 based on the technology equipment invoice applied to the ESF and $499,768 based on the technology equipment invoice applied to the Telehealth Program. Recommendation: We recommend that the School District ensures that their purchasing policy formally reflects the procurement requirements in the Uniform Guidance. We recommend that the School District establish procedures to ensure that their purchasing policy is followed, including the use of competitive bids or proposals, when appropriate. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The School District agrees with the recommendation. See separate Corrective Action Plan.
FINDING 2022-002 ? Questioned Costs Related to Procurement Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Communications Commission Program: COVID-19 Education Stabilization Fund (ESF): 84.425 COVID-19 Telehealth Program: 32.006 Criteria: In accordance with Uniform Guidance procurement requirements found in 2 CFR Part 200.318 through 200.237, the School District is required to ensure that procurement methods used for purchases are appropriate based on the dollar amount of the purchase. Recipients of federal awards should have internal controls in place to ensure procurement practices are consistent and appropriate. Policies should dictate the method of procurement that should be used, who is authorized to approve purchases, and what procurement documentation and information should be maintained. The policy should also explain which items are eligible for non-competitive procurement (i.e., available only from a single source, public emergency, expressly authorized by awarding or pass-through agency, or if competitive procurement results are deemed inadequate). Condition: The School District did not adequately document its analysis that its technology purchases for the ESF and the Telehealth Program qualified for non-competitive procurement for being available through a single source. As a result, the School District did not have documentation to provide evidence of compliance which resulted in questioned costs. Cause: The School District did not have a formal procedure in place to adequately document the procurement procedures that were used. Effect: The School District was not in compliance with the procurement requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs: $1,001,167 based on the technology equipment invoice applied to the ESF and $499,768 based on the technology equipment invoice applied to the Telehealth Program. Recommendation: We recommend that the School District ensures that their purchasing policy formally reflects the procurement requirements in the Uniform Guidance. We recommend that the School District establish procedures to ensure that their purchasing policy is followed, including the use of competitive bids or proposals, when appropriate. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The School District agrees with the recommendation. See separate Corrective Action Plan.
FINDING 2022-002 ? Questioned Costs Related to Procurement Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Communications Commission Program: COVID-19 Education Stabilization Fund (ESF): 84.425 COVID-19 Telehealth Program: 32.006 Criteria: In accordance with Uniform Guidance procurement requirements found in 2 CFR Part 200.318 through 200.237, the School District is required to ensure that procurement methods used for purchases are appropriate based on the dollar amount of the purchase. Recipients of federal awards should have internal controls in place to ensure procurement practices are consistent and appropriate. Policies should dictate the method of procurement that should be used, who is authorized to approve purchases, and what procurement documentation and information should be maintained. The policy should also explain which items are eligible for non-competitive procurement (i.e., available only from a single source, public emergency, expressly authorized by awarding or pass-through agency, or if competitive procurement results are deemed inadequate). Condition: The School District did not adequately document its analysis that its technology purchases for the ESF and the Telehealth Program qualified for non-competitive procurement for being available through a single source. As a result, the School District did not have documentation to provide evidence of compliance which resulted in questioned costs. Cause: The School District did not have a formal procedure in place to adequately document the procurement procedures that were used. Effect: The School District was not in compliance with the procurement requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs: $1,001,167 based on the technology equipment invoice applied to the ESF and $499,768 based on the technology equipment invoice applied to the Telehealth Program. Recommendation: We recommend that the School District ensures that their purchasing policy formally reflects the procurement requirements in the Uniform Guidance. We recommend that the School District establish procedures to ensure that their purchasing policy is followed, including the use of competitive bids or proposals, when appropriate. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The School District agrees with the recommendation. See separate Corrective Action Plan.
FINDING 2022-002 ? Questioned Costs Related to Procurement Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Communications Commission Program: COVID-19 Education Stabilization Fund (ESF): 84.425 COVID-19 Telehealth Program: 32.006 Criteria: In accordance with Uniform Guidance procurement requirements found in 2 CFR Part 200.318 through 200.237, the School District is required to ensure that procurement methods used for purchases are appropriate based on the dollar amount of the purchase. Recipients of federal awards should have internal controls in place to ensure procurement practices are consistent and appropriate. Policies should dictate the method of procurement that should be used, who is authorized to approve purchases, and what procurement documentation and information should be maintained. The policy should also explain which items are eligible for non-competitive procurement (i.e., available only from a single source, public emergency, expressly authorized by awarding or pass-through agency, or if competitive procurement results are deemed inadequate). Condition: The School District did not adequately document its analysis that its technology purchases for the ESF and the Telehealth Program qualified for non-competitive procurement for being available through a single source. As a result, the School District did not have documentation to provide evidence of compliance which resulted in questioned costs. Cause: The School District did not have a formal procedure in place to adequately document the procurement procedures that were used. Effect: The School District was not in compliance with the procurement requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs: $1,001,167 based on the technology equipment invoice applied to the ESF and $499,768 based on the technology equipment invoice applied to the Telehealth Program. Recommendation: We recommend that the School District ensures that their purchasing policy formally reflects the procurement requirements in the Uniform Guidance. We recommend that the School District establish procedures to ensure that their purchasing policy is followed, including the use of competitive bids or proposals, when appropriate. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The School District agrees with the recommendation. See separate Corrective Action Plan.
FINDING 2022-002 ? Questioned Costs Related to Procurement Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Communications Commission Program: COVID-19 Education Stabilization Fund (ESF): 84.425 COVID-19 Telehealth Program: 32.006 Criteria: In accordance with Uniform Guidance procurement requirements found in 2 CFR Part 200.318 through 200.237, the School District is required to ensure that procurement methods used for purchases are appropriate based on the dollar amount of the purchase. Recipients of federal awards should have internal controls in place to ensure procurement practices are consistent and appropriate. Policies should dictate the method of procurement that should be used, who is authorized to approve purchases, and what procurement documentation and information should be maintained. The policy should also explain which items are eligible for non-competitive procurement (i.e., available only from a single source, public emergency, expressly authorized by awarding or pass-through agency, or if competitive procurement results are deemed inadequate). Condition: The School District did not adequately document its analysis that its technology purchases for the ESF and the Telehealth Program qualified for non-competitive procurement for being available through a single source. As a result, the School District did not have documentation to provide evidence of compliance which resulted in questioned costs. Cause: The School District did not have a formal procedure in place to adequately document the procurement procedures that were used. Effect: The School District was not in compliance with the procurement requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs: $1,001,167 based on the technology equipment invoice applied to the ESF and $499,768 based on the technology equipment invoice applied to the Telehealth Program. Recommendation: We recommend that the School District ensures that their purchasing policy formally reflects the procurement requirements in the Uniform Guidance. We recommend that the School District establish procedures to ensure that their purchasing policy is followed, including the use of competitive bids or proposals, when appropriate. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The School District agrees with the recommendation. See separate Corrective Action Plan.
Criteria or Specific Requirement Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. ?Covered transactions? include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a passthrough entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. When a non-federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the nonfederal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended, or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. This verification may be accomplished by (1) checking the System for Award Management (SAM) Exclusions maintained by the General Services Administration (GSA) (Note: The OMB guidance at 2 CFR Part 180 and agency implementing regulations still refer to the SAM Exclusions as the Excluded Parties List System (EPLS)), (2) collecting a certification from the entity, or (3) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that entity (2 CFR section 180.300). Non-federal entities receiving contracts from the federal government are required to comply with the contract clause at FAR 52.209-6 before entering into a subcontract that will exceed $30,000, other than a subcontract for a commercially available off-the-shelf item. Per CFR 200.318 (b)(1), the non-Federal entity must maintain written standards of conduct covering conflicts of interest and governing the actions of its employees engaged in the selection, award, and administration of contracts. No employee, officer, or agent may participate in the selection, award, or administration of a contract supported by a federal award if he or she has a real or apparent conflict of interest. Condition Found and Context There was no policy in place to ensure that vendors who were used by Regent with the federal funds received were not suspended or debarred by the federal government. Possible Cause and Effect Management?s review control over its requirements for HEERF was not operating at a level of precision to ensure effective controls are in place for the program. There is an increased risk that Regent could use federal funds with a vendor who is suspended and disbarred by the federal government or selects a contract due to a conflict of interest. Questioned Costs None identified. Sampling Approach The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Identification of Repeat Finding This finding is not a repeat of a finding in the prior year. Recommendation We recommend that Regent review the compliance supplement guidance annually and when funding for new programs is obtained to ensure that all controls required for each program meet the stated standards. Views of Responsible Officials The University concurs with the recommendation. The University has already taken the necessary steps to bring all relevant policies into alignment with 2 CFR 180.220 to ensure full compliance with the suspension and debarment requirements of the policy.
See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table 2022-001: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Criteria: Per 2 CFR 200.318(i), the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Per 2 CFR 200.214, non-Federal entities are subject to the nonprocurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR Part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR Part 180 restrict awards, sub-awards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from, or ineligible for, participation in Federal Assistance programs or activities. Per 2 CFR 180.220, non-Federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making sub-awards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred or whose principals are suspended or debarred. Covered transactions include contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR Section 180.220. All nonprocurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., sub-awards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR Section 180.215. Condition/context: Five transactions were subject to the requirements of procurement based on the transaction price. Of the three transactions tested during the audit, all three were identified as not having the proper documentation supporting the procurement method. Five vendors were subject to the requirements of suspension and debarment. Of the three vendors tested during the audit, all three were identified as not having the proper documentation supporting the review of the suspension and debarment requirements prior to funds being expended. None of the entities were suspended or debarred. Questioned costs: $0 Cause: While the College has a procurement policy in place that appropriately addresses procurement, suspension and debarment, the policy was not properly followed, resulting in a lack of supporting documentation for the procurement and review of the suspension and debarment of vendors in the fiscal year. When the pandemic originally began, exceptions from competitive procurement requirements of the Uniform Guidance could be accepted if a public emergency would not permit a delay; however, the flexibility from competitive procurement has been reduced as it is unlikely the same circumstances would be occurring. The College was still operating under this previous flexibility and utilized prior vendors through sole source contracts. Effect: Per 2 CFR 200.339, if a non-Federal entity fails to comply with the U.S. Constitution, Federal statutes, regulations, or the terms and conditions of a Federal award, the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may impose additional conditions, as described in ? 200.208. If the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity determines that noncompliance cannot be remedied by imposing additional conditions, the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may take one or more of the following actions, as appropriate in the circumstances: (a) Temporarily withhold cash payments pending correction of the deficiency by the non-Federal entity or more severe enforcement action by the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity. (b) Disallow (that is, deny both use of funds and any applicable matching credit for) all or part of the cost of the activity or action not in compliance. (c) Wholly or partly suspend or terminate the Federal award. (d) Initiate suspension or debarment proceedings as authorized under 2 CFR Part 180 and Federal awarding agency regulations (or in the case of a pass-through entity, recommend such a proceeding be initiated by a Federal awarding agency). (e) Withhold further Federal awards for the project or program. (f) Take other remedies that may be legally available. Identification as a repeat finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend that management ensure it is staying updated with changes in guidance and program requirements. In addition, for more consistent application, we recommend that the procurement policy be modified to more clearly state that documentation will be maintained to identify and maintain proper supporting documentation for the method of procurement utilized and for the review of the suspension and debarment requirement. Furthermore, we recommend that the procurement policy be modified to more clearly state vendors with a transaction, in the aggregate, greater than the micro-purchase threshold are required to be procured under approved procurement methods. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management concurs with the finding. See Exhibit I.
See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table 2022-001: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Criteria: Per 2 CFR 200.318(i), the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Per 2 CFR 200.214, non-Federal entities are subject to the nonprocurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR Part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR Part 180 restrict awards, sub-awards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from, or ineligible for, participation in Federal Assistance programs or activities. Per 2 CFR 180.220, non-Federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making sub-awards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred or whose principals are suspended or debarred. Covered transactions include contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR Section 180.220. All nonprocurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., sub-awards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR Section 180.215. Condition/context: Five transactions were subject to the requirements of procurement based on the transaction price. Of the three transactions tested during the audit, all three were identified as not having the proper documentation supporting the procurement method. Five vendors were subject to the requirements of suspension and debarment. Of the three vendors tested during the audit, all three were identified as not having the proper documentation supporting the review of the suspension and debarment requirements prior to funds being expended. None of the entities were suspended or debarred. Questioned costs: $0 Cause: While the College has a procurement policy in place that appropriately addresses procurement, suspension and debarment, the policy was not properly followed, resulting in a lack of supporting documentation for the procurement and review of the suspension and debarment of vendors in the fiscal year. When the pandemic originally began, exceptions from competitive procurement requirements of the Uniform Guidance could be accepted if a public emergency would not permit a delay; however, the flexibility from competitive procurement has been reduced as it is unlikely the same circumstances would be occurring. The College was still operating under this previous flexibility and utilized prior vendors through sole source contracts. Effect: Per 2 CFR 200.339, if a non-Federal entity fails to comply with the U.S. Constitution, Federal statutes, regulations, or the terms and conditions of a Federal award, the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may impose additional conditions, as described in ? 200.208. If the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity determines that noncompliance cannot be remedied by imposing additional conditions, the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may take one or more of the following actions, as appropriate in the circumstances: (a) Temporarily withhold cash payments pending correction of the deficiency by the non-Federal entity or more severe enforcement action by the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity. (b) Disallow (that is, deny both use of funds and any applicable matching credit for) all or part of the cost of the activity or action not in compliance. (c) Wholly or partly suspend or terminate the Federal award. (d) Initiate suspension or debarment proceedings as authorized under 2 CFR Part 180 and Federal awarding agency regulations (or in the case of a pass-through entity, recommend such a proceeding be initiated by a Federal awarding agency). (e) Withhold further Federal awards for the project or program. (f) Take other remedies that may be legally available. Identification as a repeat finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend that management ensure it is staying updated with changes in guidance and program requirements. In addition, for more consistent application, we recommend that the procurement policy be modified to more clearly state that documentation will be maintained to identify and maintain proper supporting documentation for the method of procurement utilized and for the review of the suspension and debarment requirement. Furthermore, we recommend that the procurement policy be modified to more clearly state vendors with a transaction, in the aggregate, greater than the micro-purchase threshold are required to be procured under approved procurement methods. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management concurs with the finding. See Exhibit I.
Finding 2022-001: Compliance Requirement Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment Finding Type Significant Deficiency in Compliance Federal Agency U.S. Department of Energy Federal Program Title Weatherization Assistance for Low-Income Persons Assistance Listing Number 81.042 Criteria or Specific Requirement: The general procurement standards (2 CFR 200.318) requires a non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with state, local and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in 2 CFR 200.317 through 2 CFR 200.327. Condition: The Organization has adopted procurement policies as required by 2 CFR 200.317 through 200.327. The procurement policies adopted by the Organization are more restrictive than that required under Uniform Guidance. However, it was noted that the Organization is not following its adopted procurement policies. Cause: Failure to follow established policies and procedures due to program directors/leaders not being fully informed of the Organization's adopted procurement policy. Effect: When procurement procedures are not followed, the Organization increases their risk of making payments that exceed allowed costs. Recommendation: Management and the Board of Directors should review the Organization's procurement policies and procedures for consistency and to make sure that any adopted procurement policies or procedures align with those required under 2 CFR 200.317 through 2 CFR 200.327. The fiscal department needs to make sure the Organization's adopted procurement policy is communicated to all program directors/leaders and is understood and followed. View of Responsible Official (Unaudited): The Organization agrees with this finding. See corrective action plan. SECTION IV - PRIOR YEAR FINDINGS The audit for the year June 30, 2021, disclosed no findings.
Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement Information on Federal Program: U.S Department of Agriculture Child Nutrition Cluster (National School Lunch Program, School Breakfast Program, and COVD-19 Summer School Food Service Program CFDA No. 10.555, and 10.559) passed through the New York State Education Department. Criteria: CFR Section 200.318 stipulates that a non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable state, local, and tribal laws, and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal law and the standards identified in Part 200 Subpart D. Additionally, 2 CFR Section 200.213 stipulates that no awards, subawards, or contracts be awarded to parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. Statement of Condition: During our discussions with management and testing of the major program, we noted that the District is not verifying the eligibility of vendors to participate in Federal assistance programs. Statement of Cause: The District did not review compliance requirements related to procurement outlined in 2 CFR Section 200.318 and Section 200.213. Statement of Effect: The District is not in compliance with 2 CFR Section 200.213. The District is not performing required procedures, as a result, vendors that are not eligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities could be selected or the District could be overpaying for goods and services. Questioned Cost: None. Repeat Finding: YesRecommendation: We recommend that the District review the requirements of 2 CFR Section 200.213 and ensure that a review of the eligibility of potential vendors to participate in Federal assistance programs or activities is performed prior to disbursing funds to the vendor. Views of the Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The district has entered into an agreement with Capital Region BOCES for the management of our school nutrition department. They will provide documentation that the requirements of 2 CFR Section 200.213 are met and share that information with the district. This will be overseen by the food service director, Todd Barker. Perspective Information: As part of testing of compliance over procurement, a selection of vendors charged to the major program was selected for testing of compliance. Of the District?s vendors charged to the program, none were suspended or debarred from participation in Federal assistance programs or activities.
Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement Information on Federal Program: U.S Department of Agriculture Child Nutrition Cluster (National School Lunch Program, School Breakfast Program, and COVD-19 Summer School Food Service Program CFDA No. 10.555, and 10.559) passed through the New York State Education Department. Criteria: CFR Section 200.318 stipulates that a non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable state, local, and tribal laws, and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal law and the standards identified in Part 200 Subpart D. Additionally, 2 CFR Section 200.213 stipulates that no awards, subawards, or contracts be awarded to parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. Statement of Condition: During our discussions with management and testing of the major program, we noted that the District is not verifying the eligibility of vendors to participate in Federal assistance programs. Statement of Cause: The District did not review compliance requirements related to procurement outlined in 2 CFR Section 200.318 and Section 200.213. Statement of Effect: The District is not in compliance with 2 CFR Section 200.213. The District is not performing required procedures, as a result, vendors that are not eligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities could be selected or the District could be overpaying for goods and services. Questioned Cost: None. Repeat Finding: YesRecommendation: We recommend that the District review the requirements of 2 CFR Section 200.213 and ensure that a review of the eligibility of potential vendors to participate in Federal assistance programs or activities is performed prior to disbursing funds to the vendor. Views of the Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The district has entered into an agreement with Capital Region BOCES for the management of our school nutrition department. They will provide documentation that the requirements of 2 CFR Section 200.213 are met and share that information with the district. This will be overseen by the food service director, Todd Barker. Perspective Information: As part of testing of compliance over procurement, a selection of vendors charged to the major program was selected for testing of compliance. Of the District?s vendors charged to the program, none were suspended or debarred from participation in Federal assistance programs or activities.
Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement Information on Federal Program: U.S Department of Agriculture Child Nutrition Cluster (National School Lunch Program, School Breakfast Program, and COVD-19 Summer School Food Service Program CFDA No. 10.555, and 10.559) passed through the New York State Education Department. Criteria: CFR Section 200.318 stipulates that a non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable state, local, and tribal laws, and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal law and the standards identified in Part 200 Subpart D. Additionally, 2 CFR Section 200.213 stipulates that no awards, subawards, or contracts be awarded to parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. Statement of Condition: During our discussions with management and testing of the major program, we noted that the District is not verifying the eligibility of vendors to participate in Federal assistance programs. Statement of Cause: The District did not review compliance requirements related to procurement outlined in 2 CFR Section 200.318 and Section 200.213. Statement of Effect: The District is not in compliance with 2 CFR Section 200.213. The District is not performing required procedures, as a result, vendors that are not eligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities could be selected or the District could be overpaying for goods and services. Questioned Cost: None. Repeat Finding: YesRecommendation: We recommend that the District review the requirements of 2 CFR Section 200.213 and ensure that a review of the eligibility of potential vendors to participate in Federal assistance programs or activities is performed prior to disbursing funds to the vendor. Views of the Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The district has entered into an agreement with Capital Region BOCES for the management of our school nutrition department. They will provide documentation that the requirements of 2 CFR Section 200.213 are met and share that information with the district. This will be overseen by the food service director, Todd Barker. Perspective Information: As part of testing of compliance over procurement, a selection of vendors charged to the major program was selected for testing of compliance. Of the District?s vendors charged to the program, none were suspended or debarred from participation in Federal assistance programs or activities.
Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement Information on Federal Program: U.S Department of Agriculture Child Nutrition Cluster (National School Lunch Program, School Breakfast Program, and COVD-19 Summer School Food Service Program CFDA No. 10.555, and 10.559) passed through the New York State Education Department. Criteria: CFR Section 200.318 stipulates that a non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable state, local, and tribal laws, and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal law and the standards identified in Part 200 Subpart D. Additionally, 2 CFR Section 200.213 stipulates that no awards, subawards, or contracts be awarded to parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. Statement of Condition: During our discussions with management and testing of the major program, we noted that the District is not verifying the eligibility of vendors to participate in Federal assistance programs. Statement of Cause: The District did not review compliance requirements related to procurement outlined in 2 CFR Section 200.318 and Section 200.213. Statement of Effect: The District is not in compliance with 2 CFR Section 200.213. The District is not performing required procedures, as a result, vendors that are not eligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities could be selected or the District could be overpaying for goods and services. Questioned Cost: None. Repeat Finding: YesRecommendation: We recommend that the District review the requirements of 2 CFR Section 200.213 and ensure that a review of the eligibility of potential vendors to participate in Federal assistance programs or activities is performed prior to disbursing funds to the vendor. Views of the Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The district has entered into an agreement with Capital Region BOCES for the management of our school nutrition department. They will provide documentation that the requirements of 2 CFR Section 200.213 are met and share that information with the district. This will be overseen by the food service director, Todd Barker. Perspective Information: As part of testing of compliance over procurement, a selection of vendors charged to the major program was selected for testing of compliance. Of the District?s vendors charged to the program, none were suspended or debarred from participation in Federal assistance programs or activities.
Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement Information on Federal Program: U.S Department of Agriculture Child Nutrition Cluster (National School Lunch Program, School Breakfast Program, and COVD-19 Summer School Food Service Program CFDA No. 10.555, and 10.559) passed through the New York State Education Department. Criteria: CFR Section 200.318 stipulates that a non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable state, local, and tribal laws, and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal law and the standards identified in Part 200 Subpart D. Additionally, 2 CFR Section 200.213 stipulates that no awards, subawards, or contracts be awarded to parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. Statement of Condition: During our discussions with management and testing of the major program, we noted that the District is not verifying the eligibility of vendors to participate in Federal assistance programs. Statement of Cause: The District did not review compliance requirements related to procurement outlined in 2 CFR Section 200.318 and Section 200.213. Statement of Effect: The District is not in compliance with 2 CFR Section 200.213. The District is not performing required procedures, as a result, vendors that are not eligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities could be selected or the District could be overpaying for goods and services. Questioned Cost: None. Repeat Finding: YesRecommendation: We recommend that the District review the requirements of 2 CFR Section 200.213 and ensure that a review of the eligibility of potential vendors to participate in Federal assistance programs or activities is performed prior to disbursing funds to the vendor. Views of the Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The district has entered into an agreement with Capital Region BOCES for the management of our school nutrition department. They will provide documentation that the requirements of 2 CFR Section 200.213 are met and share that information with the district. This will be overseen by the food service director, Todd Barker. Perspective Information: As part of testing of compliance over procurement, a selection of vendors charged to the major program was selected for testing of compliance. Of the District?s vendors charged to the program, none were suspended or debarred from participation in Federal assistance programs or activities.
Finding 2022-002 ? Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Major Program: Formula Grants for Rural Areas AL Number: 20.509 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Transportation Pass-Through: County of DeKalb and County of Kendall Grantor Number: UFUMRHPZPVM6, ES1SZWNDT9N5, UFUMRHPZPVM6, and ES1SZWNDT9N5 Award Period: January 20, 2020 through June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: Material weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Other Matters Criteria or Specific Requirement: Voluntary Action Center is required to have documented procurement policies and procedures which comply with the compliance requirement: UG 200.318 general procurement standards, UG 200.319 competition, and 200.320 methods of procurement to be followed. Nonfederal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. ?Covered transactions? include contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (e.g. grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. Condition: Through audit procedures performed, we noted that the Voluntary Action Center does not have procedures for verifying that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded. Additionally, the contract for one of the two items tested was unable to be located. Questioned Costs: None Context: During our testing, we noted a formal policy was not in place over suspension and debarment. We also noted that the Voluntary Action Center did not determine or verify whether two vendors in which a contract was entered into was not suspended or debarred prior to entering into the contract. The contract for one of the two items tested was unable to be located. Cause: Policies and procedures had not been put into place to verify whether the Voluntary Action Center is entering into covered transactions with entities that are not suspended or debarred, and the contract was not maintained for one of the two items tested. Effect: Possible receipt of federal funds or assistance by an ineligible contractor, and proper documentation to support the transaction was not maintained. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that current policies and procedures over covered transactions be updated to include one of the following procedures related to suspension and debarment: - Searching for the person or entity within the Excluded Parties List System; - Collecting certification from the person or entity; or - Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person or entity Additionally, all contracts should be maintained and kept on file to ensure records are complete.
Finding 2022-002 ? Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Major Program: Formula Grants for Rural Areas AL Number: 20.509 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Transportation Pass-Through: County of DeKalb and County of Kendall Grantor Number: UFUMRHPZPVM6, ES1SZWNDT9N5, UFUMRHPZPVM6, and ES1SZWNDT9N5 Award Period: January 20, 2020 through June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: Material weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Other Matters Criteria or Specific Requirement: Voluntary Action Center is required to have documented procurement policies and procedures which comply with the compliance requirement: UG 200.318 general procurement standards, UG 200.319 competition, and 200.320 methods of procurement to be followed. Nonfederal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. ?Covered transactions? include contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (e.g. grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. Condition: Through audit procedures performed, we noted that the Voluntary Action Center does not have procedures for verifying that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded. Additionally, the contract for one of the two items tested was unable to be located. Questioned Costs: None Context: During our testing, we noted a formal policy was not in place over suspension and debarment. We also noted that the Voluntary Action Center did not determine or verify whether two vendors in which a contract was entered into was not suspended or debarred prior to entering into the contract. The contract for one of the two items tested was unable to be located. Cause: Policies and procedures had not been put into place to verify whether the Voluntary Action Center is entering into covered transactions with entities that are not suspended or debarred, and the contract was not maintained for one of the two items tested. Effect: Possible receipt of federal funds or assistance by an ineligible contractor, and proper documentation to support the transaction was not maintained. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that current policies and procedures over covered transactions be updated to include one of the following procedures related to suspension and debarment: - Searching for the person or entity within the Excluded Parties List System; - Collecting certification from the person or entity; or - Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person or entity Additionally, all contracts should be maintained and kept on file to ensure records are complete.
Finding 2022-002 ? Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Major Program: Formula Grants for Rural Areas AL Number: 20.509 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Transportation Pass-Through: County of DeKalb and County of Kendall Grantor Number: UFUMRHPZPVM6, ES1SZWNDT9N5, UFUMRHPZPVM6, and ES1SZWNDT9N5 Award Period: January 20, 2020 through June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: Material weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Other Matters Criteria or Specific Requirement: Voluntary Action Center is required to have documented procurement policies and procedures which comply with the compliance requirement: UG 200.318 general procurement standards, UG 200.319 competition, and 200.320 methods of procurement to be followed. Nonfederal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. ?Covered transactions? include contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (e.g. grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. Condition: Through audit procedures performed, we noted that the Voluntary Action Center does not have procedures for verifying that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded. Additionally, the contract for one of the two items tested was unable to be located. Questioned Costs: None Context: During our testing, we noted a formal policy was not in place over suspension and debarment. We also noted that the Voluntary Action Center did not determine or verify whether two vendors in which a contract was entered into was not suspended or debarred prior to entering into the contract. The contract for one of the two items tested was unable to be located. Cause: Policies and procedures had not been put into place to verify whether the Voluntary Action Center is entering into covered transactions with entities that are not suspended or debarred, and the contract was not maintained for one of the two items tested. Effect: Possible receipt of federal funds or assistance by an ineligible contractor, and proper documentation to support the transaction was not maintained. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that current policies and procedures over covered transactions be updated to include one of the following procedures related to suspension and debarment: - Searching for the person or entity within the Excluded Parties List System; - Collecting certification from the person or entity; or - Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person or entity Additionally, all contracts should be maintained and kept on file to ensure records are complete.
Finding 2022-002 ? Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Major Program: Formula Grants for Rural Areas AL Number: 20.509 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Transportation Pass-Through: County of DeKalb and County of Kendall Grantor Number: UFUMRHPZPVM6, ES1SZWNDT9N5, UFUMRHPZPVM6, and ES1SZWNDT9N5 Award Period: January 20, 2020 through June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: Material weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Other Matters Criteria or Specific Requirement: Voluntary Action Center is required to have documented procurement policies and procedures which comply with the compliance requirement: UG 200.318 general procurement standards, UG 200.319 competition, and 200.320 methods of procurement to be followed. Nonfederal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. ?Covered transactions? include contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (e.g. grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. Condition: Through audit procedures performed, we noted that the Voluntary Action Center does not have procedures for verifying that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded. Additionally, the contract for one of the two items tested was unable to be located. Questioned Costs: None Context: During our testing, we noted a formal policy was not in place over suspension and debarment. We also noted that the Voluntary Action Center did not determine or verify whether two vendors in which a contract was entered into was not suspended or debarred prior to entering into the contract. The contract for one of the two items tested was unable to be located. Cause: Policies and procedures had not been put into place to verify whether the Voluntary Action Center is entering into covered transactions with entities that are not suspended or debarred, and the contract was not maintained for one of the two items tested. Effect: Possible receipt of federal funds or assistance by an ineligible contractor, and proper documentation to support the transaction was not maintained. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that current policies and procedures over covered transactions be updated to include one of the following procedures related to suspension and debarment: - Searching for the person or entity within the Excluded Parties List System; - Collecting certification from the person or entity; or - Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person or entity Additionally, all contracts should be maintained and kept on file to ensure records are complete.
FINDING 2022-002 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, COVID-19 - School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, COVID-19 - National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 20-21, FY 21-22 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2020-004. Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a federal financial assistance award exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require sealed bids or proposals unless a non-competitive procurement can be used. During fiscal year 2021-2022, one of two vendors that exceeded the simplified acquisition threshold was not properly procured. The School Corporation entered into a contract with a vendor for a new cooler freezer project; however, public solicitation of bids or proposals were not obtained. Additionally, the School Corporation did not verify that the vendor was neither suspended nor debarred, or otherwise excluded or disqualified from participating in federal assistance programs prior to entering into the contract, which exceeded $25,000. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were isolated to 2021-2022, and the vendor noted above. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) . . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(i) states: "The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and ?? 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319, for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. . . . (b) Formal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal financial assistance award exceeds the SAT, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require following documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a non-competitive procurement can be used in accordance with ? 200.319 or paragraph (c) of this section. The following formal methods of procurement are used for procurement of property or services above the simplified acquisition threshold or a value below the simplified acquisition threshold the non- Federal entity determines to be appropriate: (1) Sealed bids. A procurement method in which bids are publicly solicited and a firm fixed-price contract (lump sum or unit price) is awarded to the responsible bidder whose bid, conforming with all the material terms and conditions of the invitation for bids, is the lowest in price. . . . (2) Proposals. A procurement method in which either a fixed price or cost-reimbursement type contract is awarded. Proposals are generally used when conditions are not appropriate for the use of sealed bids. . . . " 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause Management had not developed a system of internal control to ensure compliance with the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Effect The failure to establish an effective internal control system enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement or the compliance requirement listed above could result in loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal control to ensure compliance and to comply with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.