Finding 2022-003 ? Procurement Education Stabilization Fund ? AL #84.425, Year Ended June 30, 2022 U.S. Department of Education Pass-Through Entity ? Pennsylvania Department of Education Criteria: The Uniform Guidance requires that non-federal entities must have and use documented procurement procedures consistent with laws and regulations and the standards for the acquisition of property or services under a federal award or subaward in accordance with 2 CFR 200.318. Furthermore, the non-federal entity is required to follow formal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or service under a federal financial assistance award exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold in accordance with 2 CFR 200.320. Condition: The District did not follow the appropriate procedures to comply with Uniform Grant Guidance. During testing, it was noted that the District had made a procurement through COSTARS, a cooperative purchasing program. While purchases through COSTARS meet the cooperative purchase requirement for local government purchasing under 62 Pa.C.S. section 1902, they do not meet the more stringent requirements of the Uniform Grant Guidance. Subsequently, the District paid for this purchase utilizing the Education Stabilization Fund. In using federal funds to pay for the lease agreement, the District inadvertently did not follow its procurement policy. It was also noted that the District made a procurement through a sole source arrangement. Consistent with 2 CFR ? 200.320(c)(3), an LEA may determine that its response to the COVID-19 pandemic qualifies as a public exigency or emergency that does not permit the delay that would result from competitive bidding. Under these circumstances, and to the degree doing so is consistent with its own policies and procedures, an LEA could use noncompetitive procurement. The LEA should consult with its SEA before using this authority. Subsequently, the District paid for this purchase utilizing the Education Stabilization Fund. In using federal funds to pay for the lease agreement, the District inadvertently did not follow its procurement policy. Cause and Effect: When the District initially made the purchases, they did not follow the more stringent requirements imposed by Uniform Guidance. The District did not follow its procurement policy and ultimately did not comply with the standard of the Uniform Grant Guidance. Identification of Repeat Finding: No Questioned Costs: None Recommendation: We recommend that when the District decides to utilize cooperative purchasing programs or sole source arrangements and use federal funds to pay for those purchases they ensure that they comply with their procurement policy. The District should then document its process and how it complies with the procurement standards and keep such documentation with Federal Award budget/procurement documents. Management Response: The District has reviewed the applicable Uniform Guidance from the Federal Office of Management and Budget and its own existing administrative procedures to aid with ensuring that all procurements financed with federal funding fully comply with Uniform Guidance procurement requirements. Effective for the 22-23 fiscal year and going forward the District will fully deploy the administrative procedures and controls to all applicable District stakeholders and monitor all such procurements for compliance purposes.
ALN Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - COVID-19 Education Stabilization Fund - Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund - CFDA 84.425F Finding Type - Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - Yes - 2021-001 Criteria - The College is required to have a policy in place to ensure it is in compliance with "Never Contract with the Enemy" (2 CFR Part 183) and verifying that a contractor is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from doing business with federal assistance programs or activities (2 CFR Sections 200.212 and 200.318(h); 2 CFR section 180.300; 48 CFR Section 52.209-6). In addition, the College's procurement policy should align with 2 CFR section 200.318-327. Condition - The College did not have a policy in place to ensure it was complying with "Never Contract with the Enemy" and verifying that a contractor is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from doing business with federal assistance programs or activities. In addition, the College's policy does not include all provisions in 2 CFR Section 200 318-327. Questioned Costs - None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - The one sample selected for procurement testing was not reviewed to ensure it was in compliance with "Never Contract with the Enemy," and it was not verified that the contractor was not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from doing business with federal assistance programs or activities. The sample met the other requirements of 2 CFR Section 200.318-327, although it is not formally documented in the College's policy. Cause and Effect - The College does not have a control or policy in place to ensure it was in compliance with "Never Contract with the Enemy" and verifying that a contractor is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from doing business with federal assistance programs or activities. As a result, the College is not reviewing contracts to ensure it is in compliance with the regulation. The College has not updated its procurement policy since 2018 and does not include all Uniform Guidance provisions in the current policy. Recommendation - The College should implement controls and a policy to ensure it is in compliance with "Never Contract with the Enemy" and verify that a contractor is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from doing business with federal assistance programs or activities. It should also compare the current policy to 2 CFR Section 200.318-327 and update it as it relates to purchases made using federal funds. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - An Albion College ?Never Contract with the Enemy? policy will be put into place and have the following conditions within the policy: The ?Grants and Foundation Relations Grants Manual? will be updated to include policy information about this federal regulation and how to determine whether a subcontractor/vendor is prohibited under this policy from being paid with federal grant funds. The Grants and Foundation Relations team (?GFRT?) will include the federal regulation in every ?Grants Kickoff Meeting? checklist and will discuss with the Principal Investigators (?PI?s) during grant development so that issues can be addressed at the beginning of federal grant application process. PI?s of the federal grants will be responsible for checking the SAM excluded vendor list as they are finalizing their budget and/or planned expenditures to confirm all subcontractors/vendors are allowed and in good standing, before any contract over $50,000 is executed or any invoice greater than $20,000 is paid. The Business Office will verify that the vendors or subcontractors for federal grants have been checked against the SAM excluded vendor list during the expenditure approval process. In addition, the College with develop a procurement policy that conforms to provisions in 2 CFR Section 200.318-327 and all federal grant recipients should review and adhere to that policy for all purchases and expenditures made with federal grant funds. Consult with GFR or the Business Office if there are questions about these standards and how they may impact federal grant expenditures.
2022 ? 001: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal agency: U.S. Department of Education Federal program title: Charter Schools ALN Number: 84.282 Pass-Through Agency: Indiana Department of Education Pass-Through Number(s): U282A210017, S282D190002 Award Period: July 1, 2021 through June 30, 2022 Type of Finding: ? Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance ? Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Tile 2, Subtitle A, Chapter 2 Part 200, Subpart D, section 200.318 of the Code of Federal Regulations requires Universities to have a written procurement policy that includes certain requirements as it relates to procuring good and services using federal dollars. Additionally, 2 CFR 180.995 requires that the University has a written policy where Universities should perform a check to ensure vendors are not debarred. Condition: During our testing, it was noted that the School does not have a procurement and suspension and debarment policy in place that meets the federal requirements when acquiring goods with the federal funding. Also, it was noted during testing that the School did not verify that vendors utilized for federal program activities were not suspended or debarred. Questioned costs: None Context: The School did not have a formal, written policy that met the procurement, and suspension and debarment federal requirements. Cause: The School was unaware of this federal requirement as this was the first federal compliance audit required. Effect: Without written policies it is likely that required steps in the process may be missed. Repeat finding: No
Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Written Policies ALN Number: 10.664 Grant Number: 18-DG-11020000-050 Criteria: Title 2 of the U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) ? 180.300 (January 1, 2021) requires non-federal entities to verify an entity is not excluded or disqualified prior to entering into a covered transaction by, ?(a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that [entity]; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that [entity].? A good internal control plan requires adequate procedures to ensure the County has proper procedures in place to verify that contractors paid with grant funds are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal programs or activities. The Uniform Guidance requires nonfederal entities that receive federal awards to establish written policies, procedures, and or/standards of conduct, except if excluded in compliance supplement. There are four basic reasons for creating an internal control system through defining and documenting processes with well written policies and procedures: 1.Compliance 2.Operational Needs 3.Managing Risks 4.Continuous Improvement Complying with laws and regulations should be a critical function of the County. Well-defined and documented processes (i.e. procedures, training manuals) along with records that demonstrate process capability can make evident an effective internal control system and compliance to Federal guidelines. Another important role of documentation of procedures is to ensure processes fundamental to the County are properly guided by County?s officials, and are consistent way that meets the County?s needs, and that are important related information and data are captured and communicated. Documentation of procedures are important for controlling process, documenting the standard work that was performed and training new employees. Condition: The County lacks certain written policies and procedures required by Uniform Guidance. Although the County has an outdated Accounting Policy, certain policies for Federal Expenditures need to be updated and added. These include: 1. Financial management (200.302) 2.Payment (200.305) 3.General procurement standards (200.318) 4.Competition (200.319) 5.Methods of procurement to be followed (200.320) 6.Compensation ? personal services (200.430) 7.Compensation ? fringe benefits (200.431) 8.Relocation costs of employees (200.464) 9.Travel costs (200.474) Cause: Appears to be the result of a lack of training coupled with limited staffing and resources. Questioned Costs: None Context for Calculation Of Questioned Costs: None Effect: Without adequate procedures to ensure contractors are not suspended, debarred or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal programs or activities, there is an increased risk for the misuse of Federal funds and noncompliance with Federal regulations. Recommendation: We recommend the County implement procedures to ensure, prior to entering into a covered transaction, that a contractor in not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal programs or activities, and that procedures is adequately documented. Furthermore, the County should familiarize themselves with the Uniform Guidance and implement the following: 1.Develop and document all of its significant processes over federal awards. 2.Make the written policies and procedures available to all personnel and departments within the County 3.Ensure the written policies and procedures are accurate, complete, and current at all times (The Board of County Commissioners should update the policy on an annual basis.) 4.Revise policies and procedures for changes in business processes and policies over federal awards 5.Communicate significant changes to all affected personnel immediately to ensure they are aware of any revisions to their Responsibilities to the federal award. 6.Document policies and procedures to facilitate training and provide guidelines relative to federal awards for changes in personnel.
Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Written Policies ALN Number: 10.664 Grant Number: 18-DG-11020000-050 Criteria: Title 2 of the U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) ? 180.300 (January 1, 2021) requires non-federal entities to verify an entity is not excluded or disqualified prior to entering into a covered transaction by, ?(a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that [entity]; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that [entity].? A good internal control plan requires adequate procedures to ensure the County has proper procedures in place to verify that contractors paid with grant funds are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal programs or activities. The Uniform Guidance requires nonfederal entities that receive federal awards to establish written policies, procedures, and or/standards of conduct, except if excluded in compliance supplement. There are four basic reasons for creating an internal control system through defining and documenting processes with well written policies and procedures: 1.Compliance 2.Operational Needs 3.Managing Risks 4.Continuous Improvement Complying with laws and regulations should be a critical function of the County. Well-defined and documented processes (i.e. procedures, training manuals) along with records that demonstrate process capability can make evident an effective internal control system and compliance to Federal guidelines. Another important role of documentation of procedures is to ensure processes fundamental to the County are properly guided by County?s officials, and are consistent way that meets the County?s needs, and that are important related information and data are captured and communicated. Documentation of procedures are important for controlling process, documenting the standard work that was performed and training new employees. Condition: The County lacks certain written policies and procedures required by Uniform Guidance. Although the County has an outdated Accounting Policy, certain policies for Federal Expenditures need to be updated and added. These include: 1. Financial management (200.302) 2.Payment (200.305) 3.General procurement standards (200.318) 4.Competition (200.319) 5.Methods of procurement to be followed (200.320) 6.Compensation ? personal services (200.430) 7.Compensation ? fringe benefits (200.431) 8.Relocation costs of employees (200.464) 9.Travel costs (200.474) Cause: Appears to be the result of a lack of training coupled with limited staffing and resources. Questioned Costs: None Context for Calculation Of Questioned Costs: None Effect: Without adequate procedures to ensure contractors are not suspended, debarred or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal programs or activities, there is an increased risk for the misuse of Federal funds and noncompliance with Federal regulations. Recommendation: We recommend the County implement procedures to ensure, prior to entering into a covered transaction, that a contractor in not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal programs or activities, and that procedures is adequately documented. Furthermore, the County should familiarize themselves with the Uniform Guidance and implement the following: 1.Develop and document all of its significant processes over federal awards. 2.Make the written policies and procedures available to all personnel and departments within the County 3.Ensure the written policies and procedures are accurate, complete, and current at all times (The Board of County Commissioners should update the policy on an annual basis.) 4.Revise policies and procedures for changes in business processes and policies over federal awards 5.Communicate significant changes to all affected personnel immediately to ensure they are aware of any revisions to their Responsibilities to the federal award. 6.Document policies and procedures to facilitate training and provide guidelines relative to federal awards for changes in personnel.
2022 ? 002: Procurement Federal agency: U.S. Department of Education Federal program title: Education Stabilization Fund: Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund Student Portion and Institutional Portion ALN Number: 84.425E, 84.425F Pass-Through Agency: N/A Pass-Through Number(s): N/A Award Period: July 1, 2021 through June 30, 2022 Type of Finding: ? Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance ? Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Tile 2, Subtitle A, Chapter 2 Part 200, Subpart D, section 200.318 of the Code of Federal Regulations requires Universities to have a written procurement policy that includes certain requirements as it relates to procuring good and services using federal dollars. Additionally, 2 CFR 180.995 requires that the University has a written policy where Universities should perform a check to ensure vendors are not debarred. Condition: During our testing, it was noted that the University has a written procurement policy in place, however, the University did not adhere to the policy when acquiring goods with the HEERF funding. Also, it was noted during testing that there is no written policy that requires the University to verify that vendors are suspended or debarred. Questioned costs: None Context: The University did not have appropriate documentation that met the procurement, and suspension and debarment federal requirements. Cause: The University was unaware of this federal requirement. Effect: Without written policies it is likely that required steps in the process may be missed. Repeat Finding: The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2021-002. Recommendation: We recommend that the University review their Procurement and Suspension and debarment policies and ensure that any missing federal requirements are included in their written policies. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2022 ? 002: Procurement Federal agency: U.S. Department of Education Federal program title: Education Stabilization Fund: Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund Student Portion and Institutional Portion ALN Number: 84.425E, 84.425F Pass-Through Agency: N/A Pass-Through Number(s): N/A Award Period: July 1, 2021 through June 30, 2022 Type of Finding: ? Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance ? Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Tile 2, Subtitle A, Chapter 2 Part 200, Subpart D, section 200.318 of the Code of Federal Regulations requires Universities to have a written procurement policy that includes certain requirements as it relates to procuring good and services using federal dollars. Additionally, 2 CFR 180.995 requires that the University has a written policy where Universities should perform a check to ensure vendors are not debarred. Condition: During our testing, it was noted that the University has a written procurement policy in place, however, the University did not adhere to the policy when acquiring goods with the HEERF funding. Also, it was noted during testing that there is no written policy that requires the University to verify that vendors are suspended or debarred. Questioned costs: None Context: The University did not have appropriate documentation that met the procurement, and suspension and debarment federal requirements. Cause: The University was unaware of this federal requirement. Effect: Without written policies it is likely that required steps in the process may be missed. Repeat Finding: The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2021-002. Recommendation: We recommend that the University review their Procurement and Suspension and debarment policies and ensure that any missing federal requirements are included in their written policies. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
REFERENCE: 2022-101 CFDA NUMBER 84.425D ? COVID 19 ? EDUCATION STABILIZATION FUND CFDA NUMBER 84.425U ? COVID 19 ? EDUCATION STABILIZATION FUND U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION ? 2021 PASSED THROUGH ARIZONA STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION GRANT NUMBER: S425D210038 & S425U210038 QUESTIONED COSTS N/A CONDITION The following errors were noted during testing of allowable costs, activities and procurement: ? For 1 of 3 vendors tested for procurement, only 1 quote was available for review. ? Vendors were not evaluated for suspension or debarment prior to purchases being made. ? For 3 of 12 disbursements tested, although the purchases are allowable under the grants, the purchases were not included in the grant budgets submitted to the Arizona Department of Education. Amended budgets were submitted on August 31, 2022. CRITERIA In accordance with 2 CFR 200.320 Methods of Procurement to be Followed, The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and ?? 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in ? 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: (2) Small purchases - (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.214 Suspension and debarment, Non-federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. In accordance with 2CFR 200.403 Factors Affecting Allowability of Costs, except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: a. Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. b. Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. c. Be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the non-Federal entity. d. Be accorded consistent treatment. A cost may not be assigned to a Federal award as a direct cost if any other cost incurred for the same purpose in like circumstances has been allocated to the Federal award as an indirect cost. e. Be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), except, for state and local governments and Indian tribes only, as otherwise provided for in this part. f. Not be included as a cost or used to meet cost sharing or matching requirements of any other federally-financed program in either the current or a prior period. See also ? 200.306(b). g. Be adequately documented. See also ?? 200.300 through 200.309 of this part. h. Cost must be incurred during the approved budget period. The Federal awarding agency is authorized, at its discretion, to waive prior written approvals to carry forward unobligated balances to subsequent budget periods pursuant to ? 200.308(e)(3). In accordance with OMB Compliance Supplement, Part 6 ? Internal Control, non-Federal entities receiving Federal awards establish and maintain internal control over the Federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal awards. EFFECT Program requirements were not complied with. The School may not have received the best pricing for goods or services. CAUSE Procurement procedures were not established to ensure compliance with federal regulations, including retention of quotes from an adequate number of vendors and suspension and debarment requirements. Additionally, internal controls were not designed appropriately to ensure that expenditures charged to the grant were periodically compared to the grant budgets to determine if budget amendments should be submitted. RECOMMENDATION AND BENEFIT A control system should be developed and implemented to monitor when federal expenditures require procurement, that all documentation is obtained and retained and vendors are reviewed for suspension and debarment. Additionally, internal controls should be modified to periodically compare actual expenditures under the grant with submitted budgets. This will help ensure that program requirements are complied with, the School only uses vendors that have not been suspended or debarred and budget amendments are submitted timely. VIEWS OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS See Corrective Action Plan.
REFERENCE: 2022-101 CFDA NUMBER 84.425D ? COVID 19 ? EDUCATION STABILIZATION FUND CFDA NUMBER 84.425U ? COVID 19 ? EDUCATION STABILIZATION FUND U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION ? 2021 PASSED THROUGH ARIZONA STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION GRANT NUMBER: S425D210038 & S425U210038 QUESTIONED COSTS N/A CONDITION The following errors were noted during testing of allowable costs, activities and procurement: ? For 1 of 3 vendors tested for procurement, only 1 quote was available for review. ? Vendors were not evaluated for suspension or debarment prior to purchases being made. ? For 3 of 12 disbursements tested, although the purchases are allowable under the grants, the purchases were not included in the grant budgets submitted to the Arizona Department of Education. Amended budgets were submitted on August 31, 2022. CRITERIA In accordance with 2 CFR 200.320 Methods of Procurement to be Followed, The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and ?? 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in ? 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: (2) Small purchases - (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.214 Suspension and debarment, Non-federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. In accordance with 2CFR 200.403 Factors Affecting Allowability of Costs, except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: a. Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. b. Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. c. Be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the non-Federal entity. d. Be accorded consistent treatment. A cost may not be assigned to a Federal award as a direct cost if any other cost incurred for the same purpose in like circumstances has been allocated to the Federal award as an indirect cost. e. Be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), except, for state and local governments and Indian tribes only, as otherwise provided for in this part. f. Not be included as a cost or used to meet cost sharing or matching requirements of any other federally-financed program in either the current or a prior period. See also ? 200.306(b). g. Be adequately documented. See also ?? 200.300 through 200.309 of this part. h. Cost must be incurred during the approved budget period. The Federal awarding agency is authorized, at its discretion, to waive prior written approvals to carry forward unobligated balances to subsequent budget periods pursuant to ? 200.308(e)(3). In accordance with OMB Compliance Supplement, Part 6 ? Internal Control, non-Federal entities receiving Federal awards establish and maintain internal control over the Federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal awards. EFFECT Program requirements were not complied with. The School may not have received the best pricing for goods or services. CAUSE Procurement procedures were not established to ensure compliance with federal regulations, including retention of quotes from an adequate number of vendors and suspension and debarment requirements. Additionally, internal controls were not designed appropriately to ensure that expenditures charged to the grant were periodically compared to the grant budgets to determine if budget amendments should be submitted. RECOMMENDATION AND BENEFIT A control system should be developed and implemented to monitor when federal expenditures require procurement, that all documentation is obtained and retained and vendors are reviewed for suspension and debarment. Additionally, internal controls should be modified to periodically compare actual expenditures under the grant with submitted budgets. This will help ensure that program requirements are complied with, the School only uses vendors that have not been suspended or debarred and budget amendments are submitted timely. VIEWS OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS See Corrective Action Plan.
FINDING 2022-002 Information on the federal program: Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster ? Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Program: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program Assistance Listing Number: 10.553, 10.555 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Finding: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion, Noncompliance Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(a) states: "The non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable State, local, and tribal laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal law and the standards identified in this part." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal Entity must use one of the following methods of procurement. . . . (b) Procurement by small purchase procedures. Small purchase procedures are those relatively simple and informal procurement methods for securing services, supplies, or other property that do not cost more than the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. . . ." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement compliance requirements. Cause: The School Corporation's management had not developed a system of internal controls to ensure compliance with the compliance requirements listed above. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: There were two small purchase method procurements selected for sample testing for the audit period. One procurement was performed by the School?s Service Center, Wilson Education Center (Service Center). During the 2020-2021 school year, the Service Center solicited, evaluated, and awarded a bid for the milk on behalf of its members that School Corporation used. The Service Center was not audited for the 2020-2021 school year. During our testing of procurement and suspension and debarment for 2020-2021, it was noted that the School Corporation was not have a review control in place to monitor that the Service Center performed all necessary procedures to maintain compliance with federal regulations surrounding procurement and suspension and debarment. For 2020-2021, the School Corporation obtained procurement documents from the Service Center supporting procurements performed during the audit period. There was no documented review control in place at the School Corporation to ensure proper monitoring of the Service Center activities occur to verify federal procurement regulations were followed by the Service Center. There was one vendor that exceeded the $10,000 threshold for the School Corporation during fiscal year 2020-2021 that would require a procurement check. The error in the sample procurement performed by the Service Center selected for testing was isolated to fiscal year 2020-2021. The amount paid to the vendor for 2020-2021 was $22,211. The vendor did not met the suspension and debarment threshold ($25,000) for fiscal year 2020-2021. Proper controls over the same vendor selected for procurement and debarment and suspension were in place for the fiscal year 2021-2022 The second procurement selected for testing was a small purchase performed by the School Corporation for food purchases totaling $103,671 in fiscal year 2020-2021 and $142,368 in fiscal year 2021-2022. We noted that the School Corporation did not obtain three quotes from separate vendors. Additionally, the School Corporation did not perform a suspension and debarment check on the vendor sampled for fiscal years 2020-2021 and 2021-2022. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish controls to ensure compliance with Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. We recommend that management meet periodically with the Wilson Education Center and review and maintain procurement contract files as evidence of proper periodic monitoring of the Service Center. Additionally, we recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls related to ensure that 3 quotes are obtained as required for small purchase method procurements and to ensure the vendors are not debarred or suspended for small purchases procurements performed by the School Corporation. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
FINDING 2022-002 Information on the federal program: Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster ? Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Program: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program Assistance Listing Number: 10.553, 10.555 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Finding: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion, Noncompliance Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(a) states: "The non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable State, local, and tribal laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal law and the standards identified in this part." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal Entity must use one of the following methods of procurement. . . . (b) Procurement by small purchase procedures. Small purchase procedures are those relatively simple and informal procurement methods for securing services, supplies, or other property that do not cost more than the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. . . ." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement compliance requirements. Cause: The School Corporation's management had not developed a system of internal controls to ensure compliance with the compliance requirements listed above. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: There were two small purchase method procurements selected for sample testing for the audit period. One procurement was performed by the School?s Service Center, Wilson Education Center (Service Center). During the 2020-2021 school year, the Service Center solicited, evaluated, and awarded a bid for the milk on behalf of its members that School Corporation used. The Service Center was not audited for the 2020-2021 school year. During our testing of procurement and suspension and debarment for 2020-2021, it was noted that the School Corporation was not have a review control in place to monitor that the Service Center performed all necessary procedures to maintain compliance with federal regulations surrounding procurement and suspension and debarment. For 2020-2021, the School Corporation obtained procurement documents from the Service Center supporting procurements performed during the audit period. There was no documented review control in place at the School Corporation to ensure proper monitoring of the Service Center activities occur to verify federal procurement regulations were followed by the Service Center. There was one vendor that exceeded the $10,000 threshold for the School Corporation during fiscal year 2020-2021 that would require a procurement check. The error in the sample procurement performed by the Service Center selected for testing was isolated to fiscal year 2020-2021. The amount paid to the vendor for 2020-2021 was $22,211. The vendor did not met the suspension and debarment threshold ($25,000) for fiscal year 2020-2021. Proper controls over the same vendor selected for procurement and debarment and suspension were in place for the fiscal year 2021-2022 The second procurement selected for testing was a small purchase performed by the School Corporation for food purchases totaling $103,671 in fiscal year 2020-2021 and $142,368 in fiscal year 2021-2022. We noted that the School Corporation did not obtain three quotes from separate vendors. Additionally, the School Corporation did not perform a suspension and debarment check on the vendor sampled for fiscal years 2020-2021 and 2021-2022. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish controls to ensure compliance with Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. We recommend that management meet periodically with the Wilson Education Center and review and maintain procurement contract files as evidence of proper periodic monitoring of the Service Center. Additionally, we recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls related to ensure that 3 quotes are obtained as required for small purchase method procurements and to ensure the vendors are not debarred or suspended for small purchases procurements performed by the School Corporation. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
FINDING 2022-002 Information on the federal program: Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster ? Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Program: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program Assistance Listing Number: 10.553, 10.555 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Finding: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion, Noncompliance Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(a) states: "The non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable State, local, and tribal laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal law and the standards identified in this part." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal Entity must use one of the following methods of procurement. . . . (b) Procurement by small purchase procedures. Small purchase procedures are those relatively simple and informal procurement methods for securing services, supplies, or other property that do not cost more than the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. . . ." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement compliance requirements. Cause: The School Corporation's management had not developed a system of internal controls to ensure compliance with the compliance requirements listed above. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: There were two small purchase method procurements selected for sample testing for the audit period. One procurement was performed by the School?s Service Center, Wilson Education Center (Service Center). During the 2020-2021 school year, the Service Center solicited, evaluated, and awarded a bid for the milk on behalf of its members that School Corporation used. The Service Center was not audited for the 2020-2021 school year. During our testing of procurement and suspension and debarment for 2020-2021, it was noted that the School Corporation was not have a review control in place to monitor that the Service Center performed all necessary procedures to maintain compliance with federal regulations surrounding procurement and suspension and debarment. For 2020-2021, the School Corporation obtained procurement documents from the Service Center supporting procurements performed during the audit period. There was no documented review control in place at the School Corporation to ensure proper monitoring of the Service Center activities occur to verify federal procurement regulations were followed by the Service Center. There was one vendor that exceeded the $10,000 threshold for the School Corporation during fiscal year 2020-2021 that would require a procurement check. The error in the sample procurement performed by the Service Center selected for testing was isolated to fiscal year 2020-2021. The amount paid to the vendor for 2020-2021 was $22,211. The vendor did not met the suspension and debarment threshold ($25,000) for fiscal year 2020-2021. Proper controls over the same vendor selected for procurement and debarment and suspension were in place for the fiscal year 2021-2022 The second procurement selected for testing was a small purchase performed by the School Corporation for food purchases totaling $103,671 in fiscal year 2020-2021 and $142,368 in fiscal year 2021-2022. We noted that the School Corporation did not obtain three quotes from separate vendors. Additionally, the School Corporation did not perform a suspension and debarment check on the vendor sampled for fiscal years 2020-2021 and 2021-2022. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish controls to ensure compliance with Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. We recommend that management meet periodically with the Wilson Education Center and review and maintain procurement contract files as evidence of proper periodic monitoring of the Service Center. Additionally, we recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls related to ensure that 3 quotes are obtained as required for small purchase method procurements and to ensure the vendors are not debarred or suspended for small purchases procurements performed by the School Corporation. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
2022-001 Program: Highway Planning and Construction Cluster CFDA Number: 20.205 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Transportation Pass-through: California Department of Transportation Award Year: 2021-2022 Compliance Requirement(s): Procurement, Suspension, and Department Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency, Instance of Noncompliance Criteria: Per the 2 CFR 200.318(a), non-Federal entities other than States, including those operating Federal programs as subrecipients of States, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.327. The non-Federal entity must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200 (Uniform Guidance). Condition: As a result of the test work performed over the procurement, suspension, and debarment compliance requirements, we identified that the City?s written procedures for procurement of goods or services did not fully conform with the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR section 200.318 through 200.327. Cause: The City?s written policy and procedures for purchasing were not updated to incorporate the applicable requirements of sections 200.318 through 200.327 that apply to the procurement action based on the method of procurement. Effect: The City?s written policies and procedures did not comply with the requirements of 200.318(a). Questioned Costs: None reported. Context: Although the City?s purchasing policy incorporated portions of 2 CFR, sections 200.318 through 200.327, the written procedures do not conform to the requirements of 2 CFR, section 200.318(a) which requires that the non-federal entity must have and use documented procedures consistent with the standards identified in sections 200.318 through 200.327. The City?s written procedures do not identify the applicable requirements of sections 200.318 through 200.327 that apply to the procurement action based on the method of procurement. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): No. Recommendation: We recommend that the City continue to strengthen its written procurement procedures to incorporate the applicable requirements identified in sections 200.318 through 200.327 of the Uniform Guidance that apply based on the procurement action and the method of procurement as required by section 200.318(a). Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Management agrees with the finding. Name of Responsible Individual: Kelly Sessions, Director of Administrative Services. Anticipated Implementation Date: June 30, 2023. See separate corrective action plan.
2022-001 Program: Highway Planning and Construction Cluster CFDA Number: 20.205 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Transportation Pass-through: California Department of Transportation Award Year: 2021-2022 Compliance Requirement(s): Procurement, Suspension, and Department Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency, Instance of Noncompliance Criteria: Per the 2 CFR 200.318(a), non-Federal entities other than States, including those operating Federal programs as subrecipients of States, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.327. The non-Federal entity must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200 (Uniform Guidance). Condition: As a result of the test work performed over the procurement, suspension, and debarment compliance requirements, we identified that the City?s written procedures for procurement of goods or services did not fully conform with the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR section 200.318 through 200.327. Cause: The City?s written policy and procedures for purchasing were not updated to incorporate the applicable requirements of sections 200.318 through 200.327 that apply to the procurement action based on the method of procurement. Effect: The City?s written policies and procedures did not comply with the requirements of 200.318(a). Questioned Costs: None reported. Context: Although the City?s purchasing policy incorporated portions of 2 CFR, sections 200.318 through 200.327, the written procedures do not conform to the requirements of 2 CFR, section 200.318(a) which requires that the non-federal entity must have and use documented procedures consistent with the standards identified in sections 200.318 through 200.327. The City?s written procedures do not identify the applicable requirements of sections 200.318 through 200.327 that apply to the procurement action based on the method of procurement. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): No. Recommendation: We recommend that the City continue to strengthen its written procurement procedures to incorporate the applicable requirements identified in sections 200.318 through 200.327 of the Uniform Guidance that apply based on the procurement action and the method of procurement as required by section 200.318(a). Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Management agrees with the finding. Name of Responsible Individual: Kelly Sessions, Director of Administrative Services. Anticipated Implementation Date: June 30, 2023. See separate corrective action plan.
2022-001 Program: Highway Planning and Construction Cluster CFDA Number: 20.205 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Transportation Pass-through: California Department of Transportation Award Year: 2021-2022 Compliance Requirement(s): Procurement, Suspension, and Department Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency, Instance of Noncompliance Criteria: Per the 2 CFR 200.318(a), non-Federal entities other than States, including those operating Federal programs as subrecipients of States, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.327. The non-Federal entity must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200 (Uniform Guidance). Condition: As a result of the test work performed over the procurement, suspension, and debarment compliance requirements, we identified that the City?s written procedures for procurement of goods or services did not fully conform with the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR section 200.318 through 200.327. Cause: The City?s written policy and procedures for purchasing were not updated to incorporate the applicable requirements of sections 200.318 through 200.327 that apply to the procurement action based on the method of procurement. Effect: The City?s written policies and procedures did not comply with the requirements of 200.318(a). Questioned Costs: None reported. Context: Although the City?s purchasing policy incorporated portions of 2 CFR, sections 200.318 through 200.327, the written procedures do not conform to the requirements of 2 CFR, section 200.318(a) which requires that the non-federal entity must have and use documented procedures consistent with the standards identified in sections 200.318 through 200.327. The City?s written procedures do not identify the applicable requirements of sections 200.318 through 200.327 that apply to the procurement action based on the method of procurement. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): No. Recommendation: We recommend that the City continue to strengthen its written procurement procedures to incorporate the applicable requirements identified in sections 200.318 through 200.327 of the Uniform Guidance that apply based on the procurement action and the method of procurement as required by section 200.318(a). Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Management agrees with the finding. Name of Responsible Individual: Kelly Sessions, Director of Administrative Services. Anticipated Implementation Date: June 30, 2023. See separate corrective action plan.
2022-001 Program: Highway Planning and Construction Cluster CFDA Number: 20.205 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Transportation Pass-through: California Department of Transportation Award Year: 2021-2022 Compliance Requirement(s): Procurement, Suspension, and Department Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency, Instance of Noncompliance Criteria: Per the 2 CFR 200.318(a), non-Federal entities other than States, including those operating Federal programs as subrecipients of States, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.327. The non-Federal entity must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200 (Uniform Guidance). Condition: As a result of the test work performed over the procurement, suspension, and debarment compliance requirements, we identified that the City?s written procedures for procurement of goods or services did not fully conform with the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR section 200.318 through 200.327. Cause: The City?s written policy and procedures for purchasing were not updated to incorporate the applicable requirements of sections 200.318 through 200.327 that apply to the procurement action based on the method of procurement. Effect: The City?s written policies and procedures did not comply with the requirements of 200.318(a). Questioned Costs: None reported. Context: Although the City?s purchasing policy incorporated portions of 2 CFR, sections 200.318 through 200.327, the written procedures do not conform to the requirements of 2 CFR, section 200.318(a) which requires that the non-federal entity must have and use documented procedures consistent with the standards identified in sections 200.318 through 200.327. The City?s written procedures do not identify the applicable requirements of sections 200.318 through 200.327 that apply to the procurement action based on the method of procurement. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): No. Recommendation: We recommend that the City continue to strengthen its written procurement procedures to incorporate the applicable requirements identified in sections 200.318 through 200.327 of the Uniform Guidance that apply based on the procurement action and the method of procurement as required by section 200.318(a). Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Management agrees with the finding. Name of Responsible Individual: Kelly Sessions, Director of Administrative Services. Anticipated Implementation Date: June 30, 2023. See separate corrective action plan.
Finding 2022-004 Federal agency: U.S. Department of Education Federal program name: Special Education Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 84.027 and 84.173 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: H027A220087, H173A190086, 2022 Pass-Through Agency: Minnesota Department of Education Pass-Through Number: H027A190087, H173A180086 Award Period: Fiscal year 2022 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Material Noncompliance (Modified Opinion) Criteria or specific requirement: Non-federal entities other than states must follow the procurement standards set out at CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. This includes utilizing one of the five allowable procurement methods, including small purchase guidelines for items over the micro-purchase threshold and sealed bids, competitive proposals, or noncompetitive proposals when items exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. In addition, the Uniform Guidance requires that the entity maintain records sufficient to detail the history of the procurement. Condition: During our testing of the District?s procurements within the Special Education program, it was noted that not all procurements followed the appropriate method and history of the transaction was not sufficiently documented. Questioned Costs: ALN 84.027 - $173,812.24. Context: Out of seven procurement which were tested, we noted five of them for which the District did not retain documentation detailing the history of the procurement, including the rationale for choosing the particular vendor. Cause: The District during the pandemic and shortly thereafter, was not able to properly ensure all contracts has procurement documentation retained and performed as required by the Uniform Guidance. Effect: The District was not in compliance with Uniform Guidance requirements for the proper documentation of all procurement transactions. Repeat Finding: Yes, this is a repeat finding. It was presented as Finding 2021-012 in the previous report for fiscal year 2021. Recommendation: We recommend the District reviews its procedures and controls over procurement to ensure that all procurements are documented such that a third party can clearly see and understand the detailed history of the procurement. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Finding 2022-004 Federal agency: U.S. Department of Education Federal program name: Special Education Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 84.027 and 84.173 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: H027A220087, H173A190086, 2022 Pass-Through Agency: Minnesota Department of Education Pass-Through Number: H027A190087, H173A180086 Award Period: Fiscal year 2022 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Material Noncompliance (Modified Opinion) Criteria or specific requirement: Non-federal entities other than states must follow the procurement standards set out at CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. This includes utilizing one of the five allowable procurement methods, including small purchase guidelines for items over the micro-purchase threshold and sealed bids, competitive proposals, or noncompetitive proposals when items exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. In addition, the Uniform Guidance requires that the entity maintain records sufficient to detail the history of the procurement. Condition: During our testing of the District?s procurements within the Special Education program, it was noted that not all procurements followed the appropriate method and history of the transaction was not sufficiently documented. Questioned Costs: ALN 84.027 - $173,812.24. Context: Out of seven procurement which were tested, we noted five of them for which the District did not retain documentation detailing the history of the procurement, including the rationale for choosing the particular vendor. Cause: The District during the pandemic and shortly thereafter, was not able to properly ensure all contracts has procurement documentation retained and performed as required by the Uniform Guidance. Effect: The District was not in compliance with Uniform Guidance requirements for the proper documentation of all procurement transactions. Repeat Finding: Yes, this is a repeat finding. It was presented as Finding 2021-012 in the previous report for fiscal year 2021. Recommendation: We recommend the District reviews its procedures and controls over procurement to ensure that all procurements are documented such that a third party can clearly see and understand the detailed history of the procurement. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Finding 2022-004 Federal agency: U.S. Department of Education Federal program name: Special Education Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 84.027 and 84.173 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: H027A220087, H173A190086, 2022 Pass-Through Agency: Minnesota Department of Education Pass-Through Number: H027A190087, H173A180086 Award Period: Fiscal year 2022 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Material Noncompliance (Modified Opinion) Criteria or specific requirement: Non-federal entities other than states must follow the procurement standards set out at CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. This includes utilizing one of the five allowable procurement methods, including small purchase guidelines for items over the micro-purchase threshold and sealed bids, competitive proposals, or noncompetitive proposals when items exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. In addition, the Uniform Guidance requires that the entity maintain records sufficient to detail the history of the procurement. Condition: During our testing of the District?s procurements within the Special Education program, it was noted that not all procurements followed the appropriate method and history of the transaction was not sufficiently documented. Questioned Costs: ALN 84.027 - $173,812.24. Context: Out of seven procurement which were tested, we noted five of them for which the District did not retain documentation detailing the history of the procurement, including the rationale for choosing the particular vendor. Cause: The District during the pandemic and shortly thereafter, was not able to properly ensure all contracts has procurement documentation retained and performed as required by the Uniform Guidance. Effect: The District was not in compliance with Uniform Guidance requirements for the proper documentation of all procurement transactions. Repeat Finding: Yes, this is a repeat finding. It was presented as Finding 2021-012 in the previous report for fiscal year 2021. Recommendation: We recommend the District reviews its procedures and controls over procurement to ensure that all procurements are documented such that a third party can clearly see and understand the detailed history of the procurement. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Criteria or specific requirement: Per Uniform Guidance 2 CFR sections 200.212 and 200.318(h); 2 CFR section 180.300; 48 CFR section 52.209-6, a nonfederal entity must have procedures for verifying that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction greater than $25,000 is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded. Condition: The College did not have a policy in place to verify that a vendor had not been suspended or debarred, at the time the College entered into certain transactions greater than $25,000 with vendors. This policy was updated late in the year ended June 30, 2022, and the vendors were reviewed at that time. Questioned costs: None Context: This condition occurred for 5 of 5 vendors selected for testing. Cause: The general Terms & Conditions attached to College Purchase Orders were designed to protect the College when entering into agreements with vendors. Unfortunately, these Terms & Conditions were not updated to include the Uniform Guidance criteria pertaining to transactions with debarred, suspended or otherwise excluded vendors until late in the year ended June 30, 2022. Effect: The College could enter a covered transaction with a vendor who is suspended or debarred and not be in compliance with Uniform Guidance requirements. Repeat Finding: Yes Recommendation: We recommend the College continue to follow its policy which dictates how the College will ensure suspension and debarment procedures are followed for any aggregate disbursements with vendors greater than $25,000. This process should occur prior to entering into the transaction. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Refer to the College?s response on attached letterhead.
Federal Agency: United States Department of Treasury Federal Program Name: COVID 19 - Coronavirus State and local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Pass-Through Agency: State of Connecticut Office of Policy and Management Pass-Through Number(s): 12060-OPM20600-29669 Award Period: March 3, 2021 through December 31, 2024 Type of Finding: ? Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance ? Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Award requires compliance with the provisions of procurement, suspension, and debarment. The Town should have internal controls designed to ensure compliance with those provisions. Condition: The Town?s procurement standards do not include the required elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned costs: None Context: Although the Town did not have a policy in place in conformity with the Federal Uniform Guidance criteria, the Town did follow its own procedures as it relates to the contracts under the procurements applicable to the Town?s major programs. Cause: The Town did not formally update their procurement policy as any federal grants they receive in which procurement is required, the appropriate language is included in the grant requirements and documents. Effect: The auditor noted no instances of noncompliance with the provisions of procurement, suspension, and debarment; however, the lack of internal controls over these compliance requirements provides an opportunity for noncompliance. Repeat Finding: The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2021-002. Recommendation: We recommend that the Town review its formal procurement policies and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 and 200.326. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with this finding.
Federal Agency: United States Department of Treasury Federal Program Name: COVID 19 - Coronavirus State and local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Pass-Through Agency: State of Connecticut Office of Policy and Management Pass-Through Number(s): 12060-OPM20600-29669 Award Period: March 3, 2021 through December 31, 2024 Type of Finding: ? Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance ? Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Award requires compliance with the provisions of procurement, suspension, and debarment. The Town should have internal controls designed to ensure compliance with those provisions. Condition: The Town?s procurement standards do not include the required elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned costs: None Context: Although the Town did not have a policy in place in conformity with the Federal Uniform Guidance criteria, the Town did follow its own procedures as it relates to the contracts under the procurements applicable to the Town?s major programs. Cause: The Town did not formally update their procurement policy as any federal grants they receive in which procurement is required, the appropriate language is included in the grant requirements and documents. Effect: The auditor noted no instances of noncompliance with the provisions of procurement, suspension, and debarment; however, the lack of internal controls over these compliance requirements provides an opportunity for noncompliance. Repeat Finding: The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2021-002. Recommendation: We recommend that the Town review its formal procurement policies and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 and 200.326. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with this finding.
Finding 2022-004 Assistance Listing Number: 14.231 Name of Federal Program or Cluster: Emergency Solutions Grant Program Name of Federal Agency: Department of Housing and Urban Development Name of Pass-through Entities: Wisconsin Department of Administration and City of Racine Criteria or Specific Requirement: Management is responsible for establishing policies and procedures which follow the procurement and suspension and debarment requirements of 2 CFR 200.318. Condition: The Organization?s procurement policy lacks some of the requirements required by the Code of Federal Regulations. Cause: Due to the lack of availability of personnel time, the procurement policy has not been updated to include all the requirements for federal award agreements. Effect or Potential Effect: There is an increased risk of unallowable expenses and noncompliance with procurement and suspension and debarment requirements. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the Organization assign personnel to review and update the Organization?s procurement policy to meet the federal requirements.
Finding 2022-004 Assistance Listing Number: 14.231 Name of Federal Program or Cluster: Emergency Solutions Grant Program Name of Federal Agency: Department of Housing and Urban Development Name of Pass-through Entities: Wisconsin Department of Administration and City of Racine Criteria or Specific Requirement: Management is responsible for establishing policies and procedures which follow the procurement and suspension and debarment requirements of 2 CFR 200.318. Condition: The Organization?s procurement policy lacks some of the requirements required by the Code of Federal Regulations. Cause: Due to the lack of availability of personnel time, the procurement policy has not been updated to include all the requirements for federal award agreements. Effect or Potential Effect: There is an increased risk of unallowable expenses and noncompliance with procurement and suspension and debarment requirements. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the Organization assign personnel to review and update the Organization?s procurement policy to meet the federal requirements.
Finding 2022-004 Assistance Listing Number: 14.231 Name of Federal Program or Cluster: Emergency Solutions Grant Program Name of Federal Agency: Department of Housing and Urban Development Name of Pass-through Entities: Wisconsin Department of Administration and City of Racine Criteria or Specific Requirement: Management is responsible for establishing policies and procedures which follow the procurement and suspension and debarment requirements of 2 CFR 200.318. Condition: The Organization?s procurement policy lacks some of the requirements required by the Code of Federal Regulations. Cause: Due to the lack of availability of personnel time, the procurement policy has not been updated to include all the requirements for federal award agreements. Effect or Potential Effect: There is an increased risk of unallowable expenses and noncompliance with procurement and suspension and debarment requirements. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the Organization assign personnel to review and update the Organization?s procurement policy to meet the federal requirements.
Finding 2022-004 Assistance Listing Number: 14.231 Name of Federal Program or Cluster: Emergency Solutions Grant Program Name of Federal Agency: Department of Housing and Urban Development Name of Pass-through Entities: Wisconsin Department of Administration and City of Racine Criteria or Specific Requirement: Management is responsible for establishing policies and procedures which follow the procurement and suspension and debarment requirements of 2 CFR 200.318. Condition: The Organization?s procurement policy lacks some of the requirements required by the Code of Federal Regulations. Cause: Due to the lack of availability of personnel time, the procurement policy has not been updated to include all the requirements for federal award agreements. Effect or Potential Effect: There is an increased risk of unallowable expenses and noncompliance with procurement and suspension and debarment requirements. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the Organization assign personnel to review and update the Organization?s procurement policy to meet the federal requirements.
2022 -003 Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment Federal Agency: US Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program Name: Maternal, Infant, Early Childhood Home Visiting Assistance Listing Number: 93.870 Federal Award Identification Number and Award Period: X10MC43597 - 9/1/2021-9/29/23 X10MC39703 - 9/30/2020-9/29/2022 X11MC41939 -05/01/21-09/30/23 6X11MC45479-01-02 - 12/31/21-9/30/24 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control and Material Noncompliance (Modified Opinion) Criteria or Specific Requirement: UG ?200.318 General procurement standards. The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Additionally, non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. ?Covered transactions? include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220). All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. Condition: During our testing, we noted the following: ? 5 out of 6 applicable agreements were not supported by evidence of appropriate procurement before entering into agreement with the entity to provide services for the program. ? 4 out of 6 applicable agreements did not include the Department's Attachment 3 - "ECECD Suspension and Debarment Form". No other evidence of SAM check provided as evidence of check before entering into agreement with entity to provide services for the program ? 3 out of the 6 agreements reviewed included language to identify the entity as a subrecipient. However, not such monitoring of other required subrecipient protocols were followed because program staff did not believe they used subrecipients. Questioned Costs: N/A Context: Total amount of agreements subject to the suspension and debarment thresholds is 6. We tested all applicable agreements under this program. 2022 -003 Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment (Continued) Cause: Lack of adequate communication between program staff and ASD personnel responsible for procurements and development of agreements to make sure the adequate language was included. Effect: Department may not have followed federal guidelines for procuring vendors. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the program staff and ASD staff responsible for procuring contracts review federal compliance requirements to ensure appropriate language is included in all agreements Views of Responsible Officials: The Early Childhood Education and Care Department (ECECD) agrees with this audit finding in that the Agency did not provide CLA with the appropriate information needed to test for federal compliance requirements. Although the Agency?s Certified Procurement Officer (CPO) later verified that all agreements did contain the required ?Suspension and Debarment? language, it was too late to test in time to submit the audit on time. The various departments of ECECD will use this finding to ensure that designated ASD and Program staff fully understand the importance of providing complete and accurate information to the auditors. In addition, ECECD ASD will work toward improving communication regarding potential audit findings to the appropriate program staff, allowing for enough time to address the potential finding and possibly avoid a finding altogether. This will be completed by June 30, 2023.
2022 -003 Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment Federal Agency: US Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program Name: Maternal, Infant, Early Childhood Home Visiting Assistance Listing Number: 93.870 Federal Award Identification Number and Award Period: X10MC43597 - 9/1/2021-9/29/23 X10MC39703 - 9/30/2020-9/29/2022 X11MC41939 -05/01/21-09/30/23 6X11MC45479-01-02 - 12/31/21-9/30/24 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control and Material Noncompliance (Modified Opinion) Criteria or Specific Requirement: UG ?200.318 General procurement standards. The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Additionally, non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. ?Covered transactions? include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220). All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. Condition: During our testing, we noted the following: ? 5 out of 6 applicable agreements were not supported by evidence of appropriate procurement before entering into agreement with the entity to provide services for the program. ? 4 out of 6 applicable agreements did not include the Department's Attachment 3 - "ECECD Suspension and Debarment Form". No other evidence of SAM check provided as evidence of check before entering into agreement with entity to provide services for the program ? 3 out of the 6 agreements reviewed included language to identify the entity as a subrecipient. However, not such monitoring of other required subrecipient protocols were followed because program staff did not believe they used subrecipients. Questioned Costs: N/A Context: Total amount of agreements subject to the suspension and debarment thresholds is 6. We tested all applicable agreements under this program. 2022 -003 Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment (Continued) Cause: Lack of adequate communication between program staff and ASD personnel responsible for procurements and development of agreements to make sure the adequate language was included. Effect: Department may not have followed federal guidelines for procuring vendors. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the program staff and ASD staff responsible for procuring contracts review federal compliance requirements to ensure appropriate language is included in all agreements Views of Responsible Officials: The Early Childhood Education and Care Department (ECECD) agrees with this audit finding in that the Agency did not provide CLA with the appropriate information needed to test for federal compliance requirements. Although the Agency?s Certified Procurement Officer (CPO) later verified that all agreements did contain the required ?Suspension and Debarment? language, it was too late to test in time to submit the audit on time. The various departments of ECECD will use this finding to ensure that designated ASD and Program staff fully understand the importance of providing complete and accurate information to the auditors. In addition, ECECD ASD will work toward improving communication regarding potential audit findings to the appropriate program staff, allowing for enough time to address the potential finding and possibly avoid a finding altogether. This will be completed by June 30, 2023.
Program Information: AL #: 93.243 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services SAMHSA Youth Programs ? Youth Tree, Youth Suicide Prevention, Youth Connections Project Award Numbers: 6H79TI081193-01, 1H79SM082124-01, 1H79SM081540-01 Award Periods: 9/30/18-9/29/23, 6/30/19-6/29/24, 9/30/18-9/29/23 AL #: 93.441 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Passed through California Rural Indian Health Board, Inc. Indian Health Services ? CRIHB 22, Indian Health Services ? CRIHB 21, COVID-19 Indian Health Services ? CRIHB 21 Award Numbers: 235-18-0004 Award Periods: 4/1/18-3/31/24 Criteria: Non-Federal entities other than States, including those operating Federal programs as subrecipients of States, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200. Non-Federal entities other than States, including those operating Federal programs as subrecipients of States, must follow the suspension & debarment standards set out at 2 CFR Part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, ?Debarment and Suspension?, federal awarding agency regulations in Title 2 of the CFR adopting/implementing the OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180; program legislation; and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition/Context: During transactional testing, the following was noted: ? 93.441 ? 4 out of 5 vendors reviewed did not have evidence of multiple competitive bids being obtained. ? 93.243 ? 2 out of 2 vendors reviewed did not have evidence of multiple competitive bids being obtained. Additionally, there are no processes in place to check to ensure vendors are not suspended or debarred prior to conducting business. ? 93.441 - 4 out of 5 vendors reviewed did not have evidence or processes in place to check to ensure vendors were not suspended or debarred prior to conducting business. ? 93.243 - 2 out of 2 vendors reviewed did not have evidence or processes in place to check to ensure vendors were not suspended or debarred prior to conducting business. [ X ] Compliance Finding [ ] Significant Deficiency [ X ] Material Weakness Cause: The Clinic was unaware of the requirement to check vendors for suspension and debarment prior to conducting business with vendors, and there were ineffective controls in place during the period over procurement, along with lack of management oversight. Effect: The Clinic is not enacting fair competition in the procurement process nor are they following their policies by making sure bidding support is provided before the appropriate officials sign the Purchase Order. Additionally, the Clinic may be paying vendors that are suspended and debarred which would be an unallowable cost. Questioned Costs: AL#: 93.441 Known: Procurement- $42,903 AL#: 93.243 Known: Procurement- $15,380 Repeat Finding: Yes, 2021-003. Recommendation: We recommend the Clinic conduct training for staff and program managers to review the Clinic?s procurement, and suspension and debarment policies and procedures along with federal regulations. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared corrective action as detailed in its Corrective Action Plan.
Program Information: AL #: 93.243 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services SAMHSA Youth Programs ? Youth Tree, Youth Suicide Prevention, Youth Connections Project Award Numbers: 6H79TI081193-01, 1H79SM082124-01, 1H79SM081540-01 Award Periods: 9/30/18-9/29/23, 6/30/19-6/29/24, 9/30/18-9/29/23 AL #: 93.441 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Passed through California Rural Indian Health Board, Inc. Indian Health Services ? CRIHB 22, Indian Health Services ? CRIHB 21, COVID-19 Indian Health Services ? CRIHB 21 Award Numbers: 235-18-0004 Award Periods: 4/1/18-3/31/24 Criteria: Non-Federal entities other than States, including those operating Federal programs as subrecipients of States, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200. Non-Federal entities other than States, including those operating Federal programs as subrecipients of States, must follow the suspension & debarment standards set out at 2 CFR Part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, ?Debarment and Suspension?, federal awarding agency regulations in Title 2 of the CFR adopting/implementing the OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180; program legislation; and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition/Context: During transactional testing, the following was noted: ? 93.441 ? 4 out of 5 vendors reviewed did not have evidence of multiple competitive bids being obtained. ? 93.243 ? 2 out of 2 vendors reviewed did not have evidence of multiple competitive bids being obtained. Additionally, there are no processes in place to check to ensure vendors are not suspended or debarred prior to conducting business. ? 93.441 - 4 out of 5 vendors reviewed did not have evidence or processes in place to check to ensure vendors were not suspended or debarred prior to conducting business. ? 93.243 - 2 out of 2 vendors reviewed did not have evidence or processes in place to check to ensure vendors were not suspended or debarred prior to conducting business. [ X ] Compliance Finding [ ] Significant Deficiency [ X ] Material Weakness Cause: The Clinic was unaware of the requirement to check vendors for suspension and debarment prior to conducting business with vendors, and there were ineffective controls in place during the period over procurement, along with lack of management oversight. Effect: The Clinic is not enacting fair competition in the procurement process nor are they following their policies by making sure bidding support is provided before the appropriate officials sign the Purchase Order. Additionally, the Clinic may be paying vendors that are suspended and debarred which would be an unallowable cost. Questioned Costs: AL#: 93.441 Known: Procurement- $42,903 AL#: 93.243 Known: Procurement- $15,380 Repeat Finding: Yes, 2021-003. Recommendation: We recommend the Clinic conduct training for staff and program managers to review the Clinic?s procurement, and suspension and debarment policies and procedures along with federal regulations. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared corrective action as detailed in its Corrective Action Plan.
The Lawrence County Fiscal Court Failed To Implement Effective Internal Controls Over Federally Reimbursed Expenditures And Circumvented Internal Controls By Performing A Split Purchase Federal Program: Assistance Listing #: 21.027 COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Award Number and Year - 2022 Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Department of the Treasury Compliance Requirements; Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment Type of Finding: Material Weakness and Noncompliance Amount of Questioned Costs: $64,999 Opinion Modification: Yes, Qualified COVID Related: Yes The Lawrence County Fiscal Court paid $29,999 to a vendor for inflatables and associated items for the Lawrence County Cove project. This vendor was paid an additional $5,000 on the same day for other items applicable to the cove project for a total of $34,999. In addition, the fiscal court also made a payment of $30,000 to another vendor for the renting of equipment which is also a violation of the ethics code as discussed in finding 2022-002 and 2022-005. There was a total of $64,999 in purchases with federal funds that were not advertised or opened for bid in accordance with KRS 424.260. Additionally, vendors were not checked to see if they were debarred or suspended. The fiscal court circumvented internal controls by making split payments to the vendor for less than $30,000. The county issued separate payments to the vendor so that bidding would not be required. The county also failed to advertise or open a bid for the inflatables cove project and the rental of the dozer. The county failed to follow proper procurement procedures which results in a noncompliance with state laws and federal regulations and is at risk for extensive federal oversight and repayment of questioned costs. The version of KRS 424.260(1) in effect at the time of the subject expenditures stated, ?[e]xcept where a statute specifically fixes a larger sum as the minimum for a requirement of advertisement for bids, no city, county, or district, or board or commission of a city or county, or sheriff or county clerk, may make a contract, lease, or other agreement for: (a) Materials; (b) Supplies, except perishable foods such as meat, poultry, fish, egg products, fresh vegetables, and fresh fruits; (c) Equipment; or (d) Contractual services other than professional; involving an expenditure of more than thirty thousand dollars ($30,000) without first making newspaper advertisement for bids.? 2 CFR ?200.318(a) requires, ?[t]he non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in ? 200.317 through 200.327.? We recommend all expenditures of $30,000 or more be bid in accordance with KRS 424.260(1). Purchases should not be split in order to avoid bid requirements. The fiscal court and management should also abide by the requirements of 2 CFR ?200.318(a) by adhering to their own policies and procedures for procurement of projects.
The Lawrence County Fiscal Court Did Not Abide By 2 CFR 200.318(c)(1) Federal Program: Assistance Listing #: 21.027 COVID-19- Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds and 97.036 Disaster Grants Public Assistance Award Number and Year: 2022 Name of Federal Agency and Pass-Through Agency (if applicable): U.S. Department of the Treasury and U.S Department of Disaster Emergency Management passed through Kentucky Department of Military Affairs Compliance Requirements: Activities Allowed/Allowable Costs Type of Finding: Material Weakness and Noncompliance Amount of Questioned Costs: ALN 21.027 $4,160 (excludes $30,000 included in Finding 2022-004) and ALN 97.036 $92,984 Opinion Modification: Yes, Qualified COVID Related: Yes- ALN 21.027 During testing of ALN 97.036 and ALN 21.027, it was discovered that the Lawrence County Fiscal Court did not have internal controls over disbursements of federal funds. Federal funds were disbursed to a vendor of which the Judge/Executive?s son-in-law is a member and the judge?s brother who is the road foreman for premium pay and as a FEMA applicant agent. Provided below are the totals spent for each assistance listing number: ? ALN 97.036 Vendor Total - $78,961 ? ALN 97.036 Road Foreman Total - $14,023 ? ALN 21.027 Vendor Total - $30,000 (See finding 2022-004) ? ALN 21.027 Road Foreman Total - $4,160 The fiscal court disbursed federal funds to parties with a known relation to the Lawrence County Judge/Executive. The fiscal court is noncompliant with the 2 CFR 200.318(c)(1) and the Lawrence County Ethics Code and is at risk for extensive federal oversight and repayment of questioned costs. 2 CFR 200.318(c)(1) states, ?[t]he Non-Federal entity must maintain written standards of conduct covering conflicts of interest and governing the actions of its employees engaged in the selection, award and administration of contracts. No employee, officer, or agent may participate in the selection, award, or administration of a contract supported by a Federal award if he or she has a real or apparent conflict of interest. Such a conflict of interest would arise when the employee, officer, or agent, any member of his or her immediate family, his or her partner, or an organization which employs or is about to employ any of the parties indicated herein, has a financial or other interest in or a tangible personal benefit from a firm considered for a contract. The officers, employees, and agents of the non-Federal entity may neither solicit nor accept gratuities, favors, or anything of monetary value from contractors or parties to subcontracts. However, non-Federal entities may set standards for situations in which the financial interest is not substantial, or the gift is an unsolicited item of nominal value. The standards of conduct must provide for disciplinary actions to be applied for violations of such standards by officers, employees, or agents of the non-Federal entity.? County Ethics Code - Section III Standards of Conduct states, ?C. No county government officer or employee shall act his official capacity in any manner where he a member of his immediate family. or a business organization in which he has an Interest. has a direct or indirect financial or personal Involvement that might reasonably be expected to Impair his objectivity or independence of Judgment.? We recommend the fiscal court adhere to the requirements set by federal standards. The fiscal court should refrain from using vendors and employees that could potentially create conflicts of interest when using federal funds. If the fiscal court does choose to involve related parties, it is imperative that the ethics commissions thoroughly review and assess these transactions to ensure transparency and ethical compliance. This finding will be referred to Lawrence County Ethics Commission.
The Lawrence County Fiscal Court Did Not Abide By 2 CFR 200.318(c)(1) Federal Program: Assistance Listing #: 21.027 COVID-19- Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds and 97.036 Disaster Grants Public Assistance Award Number and Year: 2022 Name of Federal Agency and Pass-Through Agency (if applicable): U.S. Department of the Treasury and U.S Department of Disaster Emergency Management passed through Kentucky Department of Military Affairs Compliance Requirements: Activities Allowed/Allowable Costs Type of Finding: Material Weakness and Noncompliance Amount of Questioned Costs: ALN 21.027 $4,160 (excludes $30,000 included in Finding 2022-004) and ALN 97.036 $92,984 Opinion Modification: Yes, Qualified COVID Related: Yes- ALN 21.027 During testing of ALN 97.036 and ALN 21.027, it was discovered that the Lawrence County Fiscal Court did not have internal controls over disbursements of federal funds. Federal funds were disbursed to a vendor of which the Judge/Executive?s son-in-law is a member and the judge?s brother who is the road foreman for premium pay and as a FEMA applicant agent. Provided below are the totals spent for each assistance listing number: ? ALN 97.036 Vendor Total - $78,961 ? ALN 97.036 Road Foreman Total - $14,023 ? ALN 21.027 Vendor Total - $30,000 (See finding 2022-004) ? ALN 21.027 Road Foreman Total - $4,160 The fiscal court disbursed federal funds to parties with a known relation to the Lawrence County Judge/Executive. The fiscal court is noncompliant with the 2 CFR 200.318(c)(1) and the Lawrence County Ethics Code and is at risk for extensive federal oversight and repayment of questioned costs. 2 CFR 200.318(c)(1) states, ?[t]he Non-Federal entity must maintain written standards of conduct covering conflicts of interest and governing the actions of its employees engaged in the selection, award and administration of contracts. No employee, officer, or agent may participate in the selection, award, or administration of a contract supported by a Federal award if he or she has a real or apparent conflict of interest. Such a conflict of interest would arise when the employee, officer, or agent, any member of his or her immediate family, his or her partner, or an organization which employs or is about to employ any of the parties indicated herein, has a financial or other interest in or a tangible personal benefit from a firm considered for a contract. The officers, employees, and agents of the non-Federal entity may neither solicit nor accept gratuities, favors, or anything of monetary value from contractors or parties to subcontracts. However, non-Federal entities may set standards for situations in which the financial interest is not substantial, or the gift is an unsolicited item of nominal value. The standards of conduct must provide for disciplinary actions to be applied for violations of such standards by officers, employees, or agents of the non-Federal entity.? County Ethics Code - Section III Standards of Conduct states, ?C. No county government officer or employee shall act his official capacity in any manner where he a member of his immediate family. or a business organization in which he has an Interest. has a direct or indirect financial or personal Involvement that might reasonably be expected to Impair his objectivity or independence of Judgment.? We recommend the fiscal court adhere to the requirements set by federal standards. The fiscal court should refrain from using vendors and employees that could potentially create conflicts of interest when using federal funds. If the fiscal court does choose to involve related parties, it is imperative that the ethics commissions thoroughly review and assess these transactions to ensure transparency and ethical compliance. This finding will be referred to Lawrence County Ethics Commission.
2022-004 Department of Education Education Stabilization Fund: Higher Education Emergency Relief Find (HEERF) Federal Financial Assistance Listing 84.425F Institutional Portion Award Number P425F202657, Award Years 2020 and 2021 Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls over Compliance and Non-Compliance Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.318, sets forth the criteria for procurement requirements. Condition: For one vendor paid with HEERF funding, the the School District did not maintain documentation to support they obtained sufficient quotes for purchase of software. Cause: Purchases are not consistently going through the procurement process per the School District?s procurement policy or Uniform Guidance when large purchases are made through the School District?s voucher process rather than the purchase order process. Effect: As a result, the School District is not in compliance with 2 CRF section 200.318 procurement requirements. Questioned Costs: None. Context/Sampling: One of the 3 tested vendors did not have necessary documentation to support whether proper procurement policies were followed. The population for vendors meeting requirements for procurement was 7. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): Yes, Finding 2021-004. Recommendation: We recommend that all large purchases are vetted through the School District?s purchase order process to ensure proper procurement, suspension, and debarment policies are adequately followed for covered transations. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding.
2022-001 - Deficient Federal Procurement Policies and Procedures Finding Type: Material Weakness and Noncompliance over Federal Awards Programs: Capitalization Grants for Clean Water Revolving Funds (Assistance Listing Number 66.458) Criteria: Per 2 CFR Part 200.318 and 319 General Procurement Standards and Competition, the City must: ? Maintain written standards of conduct covering conflicts of interest ? Avoid acquisition of unnecessary or duplicative items ? Promote cost-effective use of share services ? Use value engineering clauses in contracts for construction projects to offer reasonable opportunities for cost reductions ? Award contracts only to responsible contractors ? Maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement, including (but not limited to) rationale for the method of procurement, selection of the contract type, selection of the contractor, and basis for the contract price ? Procurements provide for full and open competition Condition/Finding: The City was found to have inadequate controls over procurement during our testing. The lack of controls led to noncompliance over federal procurement standards because the City was unable to provide documentation demonstrating their rationale for contractor selection, selection of the contract type, basis for the contract price, or how full and open competition was achieved. Cause: The City did not have policies and procedures over procurement as required by the Uniform Guidance. Effect: The City has increased risk of entering into unfavorable contracts and/or participating inadvertently in ineligible related party transactions without following effective policies. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs were identified as a result of this finding. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the City Commission and management adopt, and follow, written policies and procedures (that conform with requirements of the Uniform Guidance) to ensure that future contracts are properly documented and awarded in a manner that demonstrates the rationale applied in awarding a contract to the most economical bidder within an appropriately competitive environment. View of Responsible Officials (Corrective Action): See corrective action plan.
FINDING 2022-004 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, COVID-19 - School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, COVID-19 - National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children, COVID-19 - Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 20/21, FY 21/22 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2020-006. Condition and Context Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000. However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold of $150,000 or less for when small purchase procedures may be used. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micropurchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. Micro-Purchases A sample of 40 micro-purchase procurements from the School Lunch fund was selected for testing to verify proper procurement methods were followed. There were 11 micro-purchase procurements, totaling $7,602, that were paid for which the School Corporation could not provide documentation to support the purchase. As such, the 11 transactions could not be verified as properly procured. Due to the number and magnitude of exceptions, per auditor judgment, we concluded it would not be appropriate to examine the remaining 24 micro-purchase procurements. Small Purchases The School Corporation could not provide supporting documentation that an adequate number of price or rate quotes was obtained to ensure full and open competition for two of six procurements under the small purchase threshold. Furthermore, vendor contracts were not entered into for two total purchases above $50,000 as required by state statute. As a result, vendors subject to contracts were not verified for suspension and debarment to ensure vendors were not suspended or debarred from participation in federal award programs. Exceeds Simplified Acquisition The School Corporation did not follow procurement requirements for purchases of commodities which exceeded the simplified acquisition threshold of $150,000. The School Corporation could not provide supporting documentation that a contract was procured for Gordon Food Service for fiscal year 2020-2021. As a result, vendors subject to contracts were not verified for suspension and debarment to ensure vendors were not suspended or debarred from participation in federal award programs. The lack of internal controls, availability of supporting documentation, and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(a) (Uniform Guidance) states: "The non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable State, local, and tribal laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal law and the standards identified in this part." 2 CFR 200.318(a) (Revised Uniform Guidance) states: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The nonFederal entity's documented procurement procedures must confirm to the procurement standards identified in ?? 200.317 through 200.327." 2 CFR 200.318(i) states: "The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and ?? 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in ? 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: (1) Micro-purchases - (i) Distribution. The acquisition of supplies or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold ( . . . ? 200.1) To the maximum extent practicable, the non-Federal entity should distribute micro-purchases equitably among qualified suppliers. (ii) Micro-purchase awards. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price or rate quotations if the non-Federal entity considers the price to be reasonable based on research, experience, purchase history or other information and documents it files accordingly. Purchase cards can be used for micro-purchases if procedures are documented and approved by the non-Federal entity. . . . (2) Small purchases - (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . . (b) Formal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal financial assistance award exceeds the SAT, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require following documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a non-competitive procurement can be used in accordance with ? 200.319 or paragraph (c) of this section. The following formal methods of procurement are used for procurement of property or services above the simplified acquisition threshold or a value below the simplified acquisition threshold the non-Federal entity determines to be appropriate: (1) Sealed bids. A procurement method in which bids are publicly solicited and a firm fixed-price contract (lump sum or unit price) is awarded to the responsible bidder whose bid, conforming with all the material terms and conditions of the invitation for bids, is the lowest in price. The sealed bids method is the preferred method for procuring construction, if the conditions. (i) In order for sealed bidding to be feasible, the following conditions should be present: (A) A complete, adequate, and realistic specification or purchase description is available; (B) Two or more responsible bidders are willing and able to compete effectively for the business; and (C) The procurement lends itself to a firm fixed price contract and the selection of the successful bidder can be made principally on the basis of price. (ii) If sealed bids are used, the following requirements apply: (A) Bids must be solicited from an adequate number of qualified sources, providing them sufficient response time prior to the date set for opening the bids, for local, and tribal governments, the invitation for bids must be publicly advertised; (B) The invitation for bids, which will include any specifications and pertinent attachments, must define the items or services in order for the bidder to properly respond; (C) All bids will be opened at the time and place prescribed in the invitation for bids, and for local and tribal governments, the bids must be opened publicly; (D) A firm fixed price contract award will be made in writing to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder. Where specified in bidding documents, factors such as discounts, transportation cost, and life cycle costs must be considered in determining which bid is lowest. Payment discounts will only be used to determine the low bid when prior experience indicates that such discounts are usually taken advantage of; and (E) Any or all bids may be rejected if there is a sound documented reason. (2) Proposals. A procurement method in which either a fixed price or cost-reimbursement type contract is awarded. Proposals are generally used when conditions are not appropriate for the use of sealed bids. They are awarded in accordance with the following requirements: (i) Requests for proposals must be publicized and identify all evaluation factors and their relative importance. Proposals must be solicited from an adequate number of qualified offerors. Any response to publicized requests for proposals must be considered to the maximum extent practical; (ii) The non-Federal entity must have a written method for conducting technical evaluations of the proposals received and making selections; (iii) Contracts must be awarded to the responsible offeror whose proposal is most advantageous to the non-Federal entity, with price and other factors considered; and (iv) The non-Federal entity may use competitive proposal procedures for qualifications-based procurement of architectural/engineering (A/E) professional services whereby offeror's qualifications are evaluated and the most qualified offeror is selected, subject to negotiation of fair and reasonable compensation. The method, where price is not used as a selection factor, can only be used in procurement of A/E professional services. It cannot be used to purchase other types of services though A/E firms that are a potential source to perform the proposed effort. . . . Indiana Code 5-22-8-3 states in part: "(a) This section applies only if the purchasing agent expects the purchase to be: (1) at least fifty thousand dollars ($50,000); and (2) not more than one hundred fifty thousand dollars ($150,000). . . . (d) If the purchasing agent receives a satisfactory quote, the purchasing agent shall award a contract to the lowest responsible and responsive offeror for each line or class of supplies required. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause Management had not established an effective system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance or that supporting documentation would have been maintained and made available for audit with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Effect The failure to establish an effective internal control system and retain and provide supporting documentation prevented the determination of the School Corporation's compliance with compliance requirement listed above. The failure to design and implement an effective system of internal controls enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure that documentation will be maintained and made available for audit and to comply with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-004 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, COVID-19 - School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, COVID-19 - National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children, COVID-19 - Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 20/21, FY 21/22 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2020-006. Condition and Context Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000. However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold of $150,000 or less for when small purchase procedures may be used. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micropurchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. Micro-Purchases A sample of 40 micro-purchase procurements from the School Lunch fund was selected for testing to verify proper procurement methods were followed. There were 11 micro-purchase procurements, totaling $7,602, that were paid for which the School Corporation could not provide documentation to support the purchase. As such, the 11 transactions could not be verified as properly procured. Due to the number and magnitude of exceptions, per auditor judgment, we concluded it would not be appropriate to examine the remaining 24 micro-purchase procurements. Small Purchases The School Corporation could not provide supporting documentation that an adequate number of price or rate quotes was obtained to ensure full and open competition for two of six procurements under the small purchase threshold. Furthermore, vendor contracts were not entered into for two total purchases above $50,000 as required by state statute. As a result, vendors subject to contracts were not verified for suspension and debarment to ensure vendors were not suspended or debarred from participation in federal award programs. Exceeds Simplified Acquisition The School Corporation did not follow procurement requirements for purchases of commodities which exceeded the simplified acquisition threshold of $150,000. The School Corporation could not provide supporting documentation that a contract was procured for Gordon Food Service for fiscal year 2020-2021. As a result, vendors subject to contracts were not verified for suspension and debarment to ensure vendors were not suspended or debarred from participation in federal award programs. The lack of internal controls, availability of supporting documentation, and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(a) (Uniform Guidance) states: "The non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable State, local, and tribal laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal law and the standards identified in this part." 2 CFR 200.318(a) (Revised Uniform Guidance) states: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The nonFederal entity's documented procurement procedures must confirm to the procurement standards identified in ?? 200.317 through 200.327." 2 CFR 200.318(i) states: "The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and ?? 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in ? 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: (1) Micro-purchases - (i) Distribution. The acquisition of supplies or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold ( . . . ? 200.1) To the maximum extent practicable, the non-Federal entity should distribute micro-purchases equitably among qualified suppliers. (ii) Micro-purchase awards. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price or rate quotations if the non-Federal entity considers the price to be reasonable based on research, experience, purchase history or other information and documents it files accordingly. Purchase cards can be used for micro-purchases if procedures are documented and approved by the non-Federal entity. . . . (2) Small purchases - (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . . (b) Formal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal financial assistance award exceeds the SAT, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require following documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a non-competitive procurement can be used in accordance with ? 200.319 or paragraph (c) of this section. The following formal methods of procurement are used for procurement of property or services above the simplified acquisition threshold or a value below the simplified acquisition threshold the non-Federal entity determines to be appropriate: (1) Sealed bids. A procurement method in which bids are publicly solicited and a firm fixed-price contract (lump sum or unit price) is awarded to the responsible bidder whose bid, conforming with all the material terms and conditions of the invitation for bids, is the lowest in price. The sealed bids method is the preferred method for procuring construction, if the conditions. (i) In order for sealed bidding to be feasible, the following conditions should be present: (A) A complete, adequate, and realistic specification or purchase description is available; (B) Two or more responsible bidders are willing and able to compete effectively for the business; and (C) The procurement lends itself to a firm fixed price contract and the selection of the successful bidder can be made principally on the basis of price. (ii) If sealed bids are used, the following requirements apply: (A) Bids must be solicited from an adequate number of qualified sources, providing them sufficient response time prior to the date set for opening the bids, for local, and tribal governments, the invitation for bids must be publicly advertised; (B) The invitation for bids, which will include any specifications and pertinent attachments, must define the items or services in order for the bidder to properly respond; (C) All bids will be opened at the time and place prescribed in the invitation for bids, and for local and tribal governments, the bids must be opened publicly; (D) A firm fixed price contract award will be made in writing to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder. Where specified in bidding documents, factors such as discounts, transportation cost, and life cycle costs must be considered in determining which bid is lowest. Payment discounts will only be used to determine the low bid when prior experience indicates that such discounts are usually taken advantage of; and (E) Any or all bids may be rejected if there is a sound documented reason. (2) Proposals. A procurement method in which either a fixed price or cost-reimbursement type contract is awarded. Proposals are generally used when conditions are not appropriate for the use of sealed bids. They are awarded in accordance with the following requirements: (i) Requests for proposals must be publicized and identify all evaluation factors and their relative importance. Proposals must be solicited from an adequate number of qualified offerors. Any response to publicized requests for proposals must be considered to the maximum extent practical; (ii) The non-Federal entity must have a written method for conducting technical evaluations of the proposals received and making selections; (iii) Contracts must be awarded to the responsible offeror whose proposal is most advantageous to the non-Federal entity, with price and other factors considered; and (iv) The non-Federal entity may use competitive proposal procedures for qualifications-based procurement of architectural/engineering (A/E) professional services whereby offeror's qualifications are evaluated and the most qualified offeror is selected, subject to negotiation of fair and reasonable compensation. The method, where price is not used as a selection factor, can only be used in procurement of A/E professional services. It cannot be used to purchase other types of services though A/E firms that are a potential source to perform the proposed effort. . . . Indiana Code 5-22-8-3 states in part: "(a) This section applies only if the purchasing agent expects the purchase to be: (1) at least fifty thousand dollars ($50,000); and (2) not more than one hundred fifty thousand dollars ($150,000). . . . (d) If the purchasing agent receives a satisfactory quote, the purchasing agent shall award a contract to the lowest responsible and responsive offeror for each line or class of supplies required. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause Management had not established an effective system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance or that supporting documentation would have been maintained and made available for audit with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Effect The failure to establish an effective internal control system and retain and provide supporting documentation prevented the determination of the School Corporation's compliance with compliance requirement listed above. The failure to design and implement an effective system of internal controls enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure that documentation will be maintained and made available for audit and to comply with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-004 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, COVID-19 - School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, COVID-19 - National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children, COVID-19 - Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 20/21, FY 21/22 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2020-006. Condition and Context Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000. However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold of $150,000 or less for when small purchase procedures may be used. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micropurchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. Micro-Purchases A sample of 40 micro-purchase procurements from the School Lunch fund was selected for testing to verify proper procurement methods were followed. There were 11 micro-purchase procurements, totaling $7,602, that were paid for which the School Corporation could not provide documentation to support the purchase. As such, the 11 transactions could not be verified as properly procured. Due to the number and magnitude of exceptions, per auditor judgment, we concluded it would not be appropriate to examine the remaining 24 micro-purchase procurements. Small Purchases The School Corporation could not provide supporting documentation that an adequate number of price or rate quotes was obtained to ensure full and open competition for two of six procurements under the small purchase threshold. Furthermore, vendor contracts were not entered into for two total purchases above $50,000 as required by state statute. As a result, vendors subject to contracts were not verified for suspension and debarment to ensure vendors were not suspended or debarred from participation in federal award programs. Exceeds Simplified Acquisition The School Corporation did not follow procurement requirements for purchases of commodities which exceeded the simplified acquisition threshold of $150,000. The School Corporation could not provide supporting documentation that a contract was procured for Gordon Food Service for fiscal year 2020-2021. As a result, vendors subject to contracts were not verified for suspension and debarment to ensure vendors were not suspended or debarred from participation in federal award programs. The lack of internal controls, availability of supporting documentation, and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(a) (Uniform Guidance) states: "The non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable State, local, and tribal laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal law and the standards identified in this part." 2 CFR 200.318(a) (Revised Uniform Guidance) states: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The nonFederal entity's documented procurement procedures must confirm to the procurement standards identified in ?? 200.317 through 200.327." 2 CFR 200.318(i) states: "The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and ?? 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in ? 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: (1) Micro-purchases - (i) Distribution. The acquisition of supplies or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold ( . . . ? 200.1) To the maximum extent practicable, the non-Federal entity should distribute micro-purchases equitably among qualified suppliers. (ii) Micro-purchase awards. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price or rate quotations if the non-Federal entity considers the price to be reasonable based on research, experience, purchase history or other information and documents it files accordingly. Purchase cards can be used for micro-purchases if procedures are documented and approved by the non-Federal entity. . . . (2) Small purchases - (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . . (b) Formal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal financial assistance award exceeds the SAT, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require following documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a non-competitive procurement can be used in accordance with ? 200.319 or paragraph (c) of this section. The following formal methods of procurement are used for procurement of property or services above the simplified acquisition threshold or a value below the simplified acquisition threshold the non-Federal entity determines to be appropriate: (1) Sealed bids. A procurement method in which bids are publicly solicited and a firm fixed-price contract (lump sum or unit price) is awarded to the responsible bidder whose bid, conforming with all the material terms and conditions of the invitation for bids, is the lowest in price. The sealed bids method is the preferred method for procuring construction, if the conditions. (i) In order for sealed bidding to be feasible, the following conditions should be present: (A) A complete, adequate, and realistic specification or purchase description is available; (B) Two or more responsible bidders are willing and able to compete effectively for the business; and (C) The procurement lends itself to a firm fixed price contract and the selection of the successful bidder can be made principally on the basis of price. (ii) If sealed bids are used, the following requirements apply: (A) Bids must be solicited from an adequate number of qualified sources, providing them sufficient response time prior to the date set for opening the bids, for local, and tribal governments, the invitation for bids must be publicly advertised; (B) The invitation for bids, which will include any specifications and pertinent attachments, must define the items or services in order for the bidder to properly respond; (C) All bids will be opened at the time and place prescribed in the invitation for bids, and for local and tribal governments, the bids must be opened publicly; (D) A firm fixed price contract award will be made in writing to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder. Where specified in bidding documents, factors such as discounts, transportation cost, and life cycle costs must be considered in determining which bid is lowest. Payment discounts will only be used to determine the low bid when prior experience indicates that such discounts are usually taken advantage of; and (E) Any or all bids may be rejected if there is a sound documented reason. (2) Proposals. A procurement method in which either a fixed price or cost-reimbursement type contract is awarded. Proposals are generally used when conditions are not appropriate for the use of sealed bids. They are awarded in accordance with the following requirements: (i) Requests for proposals must be publicized and identify all evaluation factors and their relative importance. Proposals must be solicited from an adequate number of qualified offerors. Any response to publicized requests for proposals must be considered to the maximum extent practical; (ii) The non-Federal entity must have a written method for conducting technical evaluations of the proposals received and making selections; (iii) Contracts must be awarded to the responsible offeror whose proposal is most advantageous to the non-Federal entity, with price and other factors considered; and (iv) The non-Federal entity may use competitive proposal procedures for qualifications-based procurement of architectural/engineering (A/E) professional services whereby offeror's qualifications are evaluated and the most qualified offeror is selected, subject to negotiation of fair and reasonable compensation. The method, where price is not used as a selection factor, can only be used in procurement of A/E professional services. It cannot be used to purchase other types of services though A/E firms that are a potential source to perform the proposed effort. . . . Indiana Code 5-22-8-3 states in part: "(a) This section applies only if the purchasing agent expects the purchase to be: (1) at least fifty thousand dollars ($50,000); and (2) not more than one hundred fifty thousand dollars ($150,000). . . . (d) If the purchasing agent receives a satisfactory quote, the purchasing agent shall award a contract to the lowest responsible and responsive offeror for each line or class of supplies required. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause Management had not established an effective system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance or that supporting documentation would have been maintained and made available for audit with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Effect The failure to establish an effective internal control system and retain and provide supporting documentation prevented the determination of the School Corporation's compliance with compliance requirement listed above. The failure to design and implement an effective system of internal controls enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure that documentation will be maintained and made available for audit and to comply with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-004 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, COVID-19 - School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, COVID-19 - National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children, COVID-19 - Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 20/21, FY 21/22 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2020-006. Condition and Context Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000. However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold of $150,000 or less for when small purchase procedures may be used. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micropurchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. Micro-Purchases A sample of 40 micro-purchase procurements from the School Lunch fund was selected for testing to verify proper procurement methods were followed. There were 11 micro-purchase procurements, totaling $7,602, that were paid for which the School Corporation could not provide documentation to support the purchase. As such, the 11 transactions could not be verified as properly procured. Due to the number and magnitude of exceptions, per auditor judgment, we concluded it would not be appropriate to examine the remaining 24 micro-purchase procurements. Small Purchases The School Corporation could not provide supporting documentation that an adequate number of price or rate quotes was obtained to ensure full and open competition for two of six procurements under the small purchase threshold. Furthermore, vendor contracts were not entered into for two total purchases above $50,000 as required by state statute. As a result, vendors subject to contracts were not verified for suspension and debarment to ensure vendors were not suspended or debarred from participation in federal award programs. Exceeds Simplified Acquisition The School Corporation did not follow procurement requirements for purchases of commodities which exceeded the simplified acquisition threshold of $150,000. The School Corporation could not provide supporting documentation that a contract was procured for Gordon Food Service for fiscal year 2020-2021. As a result, vendors subject to contracts were not verified for suspension and debarment to ensure vendors were not suspended or debarred from participation in federal award programs. The lack of internal controls, availability of supporting documentation, and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(a) (Uniform Guidance) states: "The non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable State, local, and tribal laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal law and the standards identified in this part." 2 CFR 200.318(a) (Revised Uniform Guidance) states: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The nonFederal entity's documented procurement procedures must confirm to the procurement standards identified in ?? 200.317 through 200.327." 2 CFR 200.318(i) states: "The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and ?? 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in ? 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: (1) Micro-purchases - (i) Distribution. The acquisition of supplies or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold ( . . . ? 200.1) To the maximum extent practicable, the non-Federal entity should distribute micro-purchases equitably among qualified suppliers. (ii) Micro-purchase awards. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price or rate quotations if the non-Federal entity considers the price to be reasonable based on research, experience, purchase history or other information and documents it files accordingly. Purchase cards can be used for micro-purchases if procedures are documented and approved by the non-Federal entity. . . . (2) Small purchases - (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . . (b) Formal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal financial assistance award exceeds the SAT, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require following documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a non-competitive procurement can be used in accordance with ? 200.319 or paragraph (c) of this section. The following formal methods of procurement are used for procurement of property or services above the simplified acquisition threshold or a value below the simplified acquisition threshold the non-Federal entity determines to be appropriate: (1) Sealed bids. A procurement method in which bids are publicly solicited and a firm fixed-price contract (lump sum or unit price) is awarded to the responsible bidder whose bid, conforming with all the material terms and conditions of the invitation for bids, is the lowest in price. The sealed bids method is the preferred method for procuring construction, if the conditions. (i) In order for sealed bidding to be feasible, the following conditions should be present: (A) A complete, adequate, and realistic specification or purchase description is available; (B) Two or more responsible bidders are willing and able to compete effectively for the business; and (C) The procurement lends itself to a firm fixed price contract and the selection of the successful bidder can be made principally on the basis of price. (ii) If sealed bids are used, the following requirements apply: (A) Bids must be solicited from an adequate number of qualified sources, providing them sufficient response time prior to the date set for opening the bids, for local, and tribal governments, the invitation for bids must be publicly advertised; (B) The invitation for bids, which will include any specifications and pertinent attachments, must define the items or services in order for the bidder to properly respond; (C) All bids will be opened at the time and place prescribed in the invitation for bids, and for local and tribal governments, the bids must be opened publicly; (D) A firm fixed price contract award will be made in writing to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder. Where specified in bidding documents, factors such as discounts, transportation cost, and life cycle costs must be considered in determining which bid is lowest. Payment discounts will only be used to determine the low bid when prior experience indicates that such discounts are usually taken advantage of; and (E) Any or all bids may be rejected if there is a sound documented reason. (2) Proposals. A procurement method in which either a fixed price or cost-reimbursement type contract is awarded. Proposals are generally used when conditions are not appropriate for the use of sealed bids. They are awarded in accordance with the following requirements: (i) Requests for proposals must be publicized and identify all evaluation factors and their relative importance. Proposals must be solicited from an adequate number of qualified offerors. Any response to publicized requests for proposals must be considered to the maximum extent practical; (ii) The non-Federal entity must have a written method for conducting technical evaluations of the proposals received and making selections; (iii) Contracts must be awarded to the responsible offeror whose proposal is most advantageous to the non-Federal entity, with price and other factors considered; and (iv) The non-Federal entity may use competitive proposal procedures for qualifications-based procurement of architectural/engineering (A/E) professional services whereby offeror's qualifications are evaluated and the most qualified offeror is selected, subject to negotiation of fair and reasonable compensation. The method, where price is not used as a selection factor, can only be used in procurement of A/E professional services. It cannot be used to purchase other types of services though A/E firms that are a potential source to perform the proposed effort. . . . Indiana Code 5-22-8-3 states in part: "(a) This section applies only if the purchasing agent expects the purchase to be: (1) at least fifty thousand dollars ($50,000); and (2) not more than one hundred fifty thousand dollars ($150,000). . . . (d) If the purchasing agent receives a satisfactory quote, the purchasing agent shall award a contract to the lowest responsible and responsive offeror for each line or class of supplies required. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause Management had not established an effective system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance or that supporting documentation would have been maintained and made available for audit with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Effect The failure to establish an effective internal control system and retain and provide supporting documentation prevented the determination of the School Corporation's compliance with compliance requirement listed above. The failure to design and implement an effective system of internal controls enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure that documentation will be maintained and made available for audit and to comply with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-004 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, COVID-19 - School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, COVID-19 - National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children, COVID-19 - Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 20/21, FY 21/22 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2020-006. Condition and Context Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000. However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold of $150,000 or less for when small purchase procedures may be used. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micropurchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. Micro-Purchases A sample of 40 micro-purchase procurements from the School Lunch fund was selected for testing to verify proper procurement methods were followed. There were 11 micro-purchase procurements, totaling $7,602, that were paid for which the School Corporation could not provide documentation to support the purchase. As such, the 11 transactions could not be verified as properly procured. Due to the number and magnitude of exceptions, per auditor judgment, we concluded it would not be appropriate to examine the remaining 24 micro-purchase procurements. Small Purchases The School Corporation could not provide supporting documentation that an adequate number of price or rate quotes was obtained to ensure full and open competition for two of six procurements under the small purchase threshold. Furthermore, vendor contracts were not entered into for two total purchases above $50,000 as required by state statute. As a result, vendors subject to contracts were not verified for suspension and debarment to ensure vendors were not suspended or debarred from participation in federal award programs. Exceeds Simplified Acquisition The School Corporation did not follow procurement requirements for purchases of commodities which exceeded the simplified acquisition threshold of $150,000. The School Corporation could not provide supporting documentation that a contract was procured for Gordon Food Service for fiscal year 2020-2021. As a result, vendors subject to contracts were not verified for suspension and debarment to ensure vendors were not suspended or debarred from participation in federal award programs. The lack of internal controls, availability of supporting documentation, and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(a) (Uniform Guidance) states: "The non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable State, local, and tribal laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal law and the standards identified in this part." 2 CFR 200.318(a) (Revised Uniform Guidance) states: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The nonFederal entity's documented procurement procedures must confirm to the procurement standards identified in ?? 200.317 through 200.327." 2 CFR 200.318(i) states: "The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and ?? 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in ? 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: (1) Micro-purchases - (i) Distribution. The acquisition of supplies or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold ( . . . ? 200.1) To the maximum extent practicable, the non-Federal entity should distribute micro-purchases equitably among qualified suppliers. (ii) Micro-purchase awards. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price or rate quotations if the non-Federal entity considers the price to be reasonable based on research, experience, purchase history or other information and documents it files accordingly. Purchase cards can be used for micro-purchases if procedures are documented and approved by the non-Federal entity. . . . (2) Small purchases - (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . . (b) Formal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal financial assistance award exceeds the SAT, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require following documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a non-competitive procurement can be used in accordance with ? 200.319 or paragraph (c) of this section. The following formal methods of procurement are used for procurement of property or services above the simplified acquisition threshold or a value below the simplified acquisition threshold the non-Federal entity determines to be appropriate: (1) Sealed bids. A procurement method in which bids are publicly solicited and a firm fixed-price contract (lump sum or unit price) is awarded to the responsible bidder whose bid, conforming with all the material terms and conditions of the invitation for bids, is the lowest in price. The sealed bids method is the preferred method for procuring construction, if the conditions. (i) In order for sealed bidding to be feasible, the following conditions should be present: (A) A complete, adequate, and realistic specification or purchase description is available; (B) Two or more responsible bidders are willing and able to compete effectively for the business; and (C) The procurement lends itself to a firm fixed price contract and the selection of the successful bidder can be made principally on the basis of price. (ii) If sealed bids are used, the following requirements apply: (A) Bids must be solicited from an adequate number of qualified sources, providing them sufficient response time prior to the date set for opening the bids, for local, and tribal governments, the invitation for bids must be publicly advertised; (B) The invitation for bids, which will include any specifications and pertinent attachments, must define the items or services in order for the bidder to properly respond; (C) All bids will be opened at the time and place prescribed in the invitation for bids, and for local and tribal governments, the bids must be opened publicly; (D) A firm fixed price contract award will be made in writing to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder. Where specified in bidding documents, factors such as discounts, transportation cost, and life cycle costs must be considered in determining which bid is lowest. Payment discounts will only be used to determine the low bid when prior experience indicates that such discounts are usually taken advantage of; and (E) Any or all bids may be rejected if there is a sound documented reason. (2) Proposals. A procurement method in which either a fixed price or cost-reimbursement type contract is awarded. Proposals are generally used when conditions are not appropriate for the use of sealed bids. They are awarded in accordance with the following requirements: (i) Requests for proposals must be publicized and identify all evaluation factors and their relative importance. Proposals must be solicited from an adequate number of qualified offerors. Any response to publicized requests for proposals must be considered to the maximum extent practical; (ii) The non-Federal entity must have a written method for conducting technical evaluations of the proposals received and making selections; (iii) Contracts must be awarded to the responsible offeror whose proposal is most advantageous to the non-Federal entity, with price and other factors considered; and (iv) The non-Federal entity may use competitive proposal procedures for qualifications-based procurement of architectural/engineering (A/E) professional services whereby offeror's qualifications are evaluated and the most qualified offeror is selected, subject to negotiation of fair and reasonable compensation. The method, where price is not used as a selection factor, can only be used in procurement of A/E professional services. It cannot be used to purchase other types of services though A/E firms that are a potential source to perform the proposed effort. . . . Indiana Code 5-22-8-3 states in part: "(a) This section applies only if the purchasing agent expects the purchase to be: (1) at least fifty thousand dollars ($50,000); and (2) not more than one hundred fifty thousand dollars ($150,000). . . . (d) If the purchasing agent receives a satisfactory quote, the purchasing agent shall award a contract to the lowest responsible and responsive offeror for each line or class of supplies required. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause Management had not established an effective system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance or that supporting documentation would have been maintained and made available for audit with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Effect The failure to establish an effective internal control system and retain and provide supporting documentation prevented the determination of the School Corporation's compliance with compliance requirement listed above. The failure to design and implement an effective system of internal controls enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure that documentation will be maintained and made available for audit and to comply with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-004 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, COVID-19 - School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, COVID-19 - National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children, COVID-19 - Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 20/21, FY 21/22 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2020-006. Condition and Context Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000. However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold of $150,000 or less for when small purchase procedures may be used. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micropurchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. Micro-Purchases A sample of 40 micro-purchase procurements from the School Lunch fund was selected for testing to verify proper procurement methods were followed. There were 11 micro-purchase procurements, totaling $7,602, that were paid for which the School Corporation could not provide documentation to support the purchase. As such, the 11 transactions could not be verified as properly procured. Due to the number and magnitude of exceptions, per auditor judgment, we concluded it would not be appropriate to examine the remaining 24 micro-purchase procurements. Small Purchases The School Corporation could not provide supporting documentation that an adequate number of price or rate quotes was obtained to ensure full and open competition for two of six procurements under the small purchase threshold. Furthermore, vendor contracts were not entered into for two total purchases above $50,000 as required by state statute. As a result, vendors subject to contracts were not verified for suspension and debarment to ensure vendors were not suspended or debarred from participation in federal award programs. Exceeds Simplified Acquisition The School Corporation did not follow procurement requirements for purchases of commodities which exceeded the simplified acquisition threshold of $150,000. The School Corporation could not provide supporting documentation that a contract was procured for Gordon Food Service for fiscal year 2020-2021. As a result, vendors subject to contracts were not verified for suspension and debarment to ensure vendors were not suspended or debarred from participation in federal award programs. The lack of internal controls, availability of supporting documentation, and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(a) (Uniform Guidance) states: "The non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable State, local, and tribal laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal law and the standards identified in this part." 2 CFR 200.318(a) (Revised Uniform Guidance) states: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The nonFederal entity's documented procurement procedures must confirm to the procurement standards identified in ?? 200.317 through 200.327." 2 CFR 200.318(i) states: "The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and ?? 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in ? 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: (1) Micro-purchases - (i) Distribution. The acquisition of supplies or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold ( . . . ? 200.1) To the maximum extent practicable, the non-Federal entity should distribute micro-purchases equitably among qualified suppliers. (ii) Micro-purchase awards. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price or rate quotations if the non-Federal entity considers the price to be reasonable based on research, experience, purchase history or other information and documents it files accordingly. Purchase cards can be used for micro-purchases if procedures are documented and approved by the non-Federal entity. . . . (2) Small purchases - (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . . (b) Formal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal financial assistance award exceeds the SAT, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require following documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a non-competitive procurement can be used in accordance with ? 200.319 or paragraph (c) of this section. The following formal methods of procurement are used for procurement of property or services above the simplified acquisition threshold or a value below the simplified acquisition threshold the non-Federal entity determines to be appropriate: (1) Sealed bids. A procurement method in which bids are publicly solicited and a firm fixed-price contract (lump sum or unit price) is awarded to the responsible bidder whose bid, conforming with all the material terms and conditions of the invitation for bids, is the lowest in price. The sealed bids method is the preferred method for procuring construction, if the conditions. (i) In order for sealed bidding to be feasible, the following conditions should be present: (A) A complete, adequate, and realistic specification or purchase description is available; (B) Two or more responsible bidders are willing and able to compete effectively for the business; and (C) The procurement lends itself to a firm fixed price contract and the selection of the successful bidder can be made principally on the basis of price. (ii) If sealed bids are used, the following requirements apply: (A) Bids must be solicited from an adequate number of qualified sources, providing them sufficient response time prior to the date set for opening the bids, for local, and tribal governments, the invitation for bids must be publicly advertised; (B) The invitation for bids, which will include any specifications and pertinent attachments, must define the items or services in order for the bidder to properly respond; (C) All bids will be opened at the time and place prescribed in the invitation for bids, and for local and tribal governments, the bids must be opened publicly; (D) A firm fixed price contract award will be made in writing to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder. Where specified in bidding documents, factors such as discounts, transportation cost, and life cycle costs must be considered in determining which bid is lowest. Payment discounts will only be used to determine the low bid when prior experience indicates that such discounts are usually taken advantage of; and (E) Any or all bids may be rejected if there is a sound documented reason. (2) Proposals. A procurement method in which either a fixed price or cost-reimbursement type contract is awarded. Proposals are generally used when conditions are not appropriate for the use of sealed bids. They are awarded in accordance with the following requirements: (i) Requests for proposals must be publicized and identify all evaluation factors and their relative importance. Proposals must be solicited from an adequate number of qualified offerors. Any response to publicized requests for proposals must be considered to the maximum extent practical; (ii) The non-Federal entity must have a written method for conducting technical evaluations of the proposals received and making selections; (iii) Contracts must be awarded to the responsible offeror whose proposal is most advantageous to the non-Federal entity, with price and other factors considered; and (iv) The non-Federal entity may use competitive proposal procedures for qualifications-based procurement of architectural/engineering (A/E) professional services whereby offeror's qualifications are evaluated and the most qualified offeror is selected, subject to negotiation of fair and reasonable compensation. The method, where price is not used as a selection factor, can only be used in procurement of A/E professional services. It cannot be used to purchase other types of services though A/E firms that are a potential source to perform the proposed effort. . . . Indiana Code 5-22-8-3 states in part: "(a) This section applies only if the purchasing agent expects the purchase to be: (1) at least fifty thousand dollars ($50,000); and (2) not more than one hundred fifty thousand dollars ($150,000). . . . (d) If the purchasing agent receives a satisfactory quote, the purchasing agent shall award a contract to the lowest responsible and responsive offeror for each line or class of supplies required. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause Management had not established an effective system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance or that supporting documentation would have been maintained and made available for audit with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Effect The failure to establish an effective internal control system and retain and provide supporting documentation prevented the determination of the School Corporation's compliance with compliance requirement listed above. The failure to design and implement an effective system of internal controls enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure that documentation will be maintained and made available for audit and to comply with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-004 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, COVID-19 - School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, COVID-19 - National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children, COVID-19 - Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 20/21, FY 21/22 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2020-006. Condition and Context Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000. However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold of $150,000 or less for when small purchase procedures may be used. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micropurchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. Micro-Purchases A sample of 40 micro-purchase procurements from the School Lunch fund was selected for testing to verify proper procurement methods were followed. There were 11 micro-purchase procurements, totaling $7,602, that were paid for which the School Corporation could not provide documentation to support the purchase. As such, the 11 transactions could not be verified as properly procured. Due to the number and magnitude of exceptions, per auditor judgment, we concluded it would not be appropriate to examine the remaining 24 micro-purchase procurements. Small Purchases The School Corporation could not provide supporting documentation that an adequate number of price or rate quotes was obtained to ensure full and open competition for two of six procurements under the small purchase threshold. Furthermore, vendor contracts were not entered into for two total purchases above $50,000 as required by state statute. As a result, vendors subject to contracts were not verified for suspension and debarment to ensure vendors were not suspended or debarred from participation in federal award programs. Exceeds Simplified Acquisition The School Corporation did not follow procurement requirements for purchases of commodities which exceeded the simplified acquisition threshold of $150,000. The School Corporation could not provide supporting documentation that a contract was procured for Gordon Food Service for fiscal year 2020-2021. As a result, vendors subject to contracts were not verified for suspension and debarment to ensure vendors were not suspended or debarred from participation in federal award programs. The lack of internal controls, availability of supporting documentation, and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(a) (Uniform Guidance) states: "The non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable State, local, and tribal laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal law and the standards identified in this part." 2 CFR 200.318(a) (Revised Uniform Guidance) states: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The nonFederal entity's documented procurement procedures must confirm to the procurement standards identified in ?? 200.317 through 200.327." 2 CFR 200.318(i) states: "The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and ?? 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in ? 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: (1) Micro-purchases - (i) Distribution. The acquisition of supplies or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold ( . . . ? 200.1) To the maximum extent practicable, the non-Federal entity should distribute micro-purchases equitably among qualified suppliers. (ii) Micro-purchase awards. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price or rate quotations if the non-Federal entity considers the price to be reasonable based on research, experience, purchase history or other information and documents it files accordingly. Purchase cards can be used for micro-purchases if procedures are documented and approved by the non-Federal entity. . . . (2) Small purchases - (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . . (b) Formal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal financial assistance award exceeds the SAT, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require following documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a non-competitive procurement can be used in accordance with ? 200.319 or paragraph (c) of this section. The following formal methods of procurement are used for procurement of property or services above the simplified acquisition threshold or a value below the simplified acquisition threshold the non-Federal entity determines to be appropriate: (1) Sealed bids. A procurement method in which bids are publicly solicited and a firm fixed-price contract (lump sum or unit price) is awarded to the responsible bidder whose bid, conforming with all the material terms and conditions of the invitation for bids, is the lowest in price. The sealed bids method is the preferred method for procuring construction, if the conditions. (i) In order for sealed bidding to be feasible, the following conditions should be present: (A) A complete, adequate, and realistic specification or purchase description is available; (B) Two or more responsible bidders are willing and able to compete effectively for the business; and (C) The procurement lends itself to a firm fixed price contract and the selection of the successful bidder can be made principally on the basis of price. (ii) If sealed bids are used, the following requirements apply: (A) Bids must be solicited from an adequate number of qualified sources, providing them sufficient response time prior to the date set for opening the bids, for local, and tribal governments, the invitation for bids must be publicly advertised; (B) The invitation for bids, which will include any specifications and pertinent attachments, must define the items or services in order for the bidder to properly respond; (C) All bids will be opened at the time and place prescribed in the invitation for bids, and for local and tribal governments, the bids must be opened publicly; (D) A firm fixed price contract award will be made in writing to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder. Where specified in bidding documents, factors such as discounts, transportation cost, and life cycle costs must be considered in determining which bid is lowest. Payment discounts will only be used to determine the low bid when prior experience indicates that such discounts are usually taken advantage of; and (E) Any or all bids may be rejected if there is a sound documented reason. (2) Proposals. A procurement method in which either a fixed price or cost-reimbursement type contract is awarded. Proposals are generally used when conditions are not appropriate for the use of sealed bids. They are awarded in accordance with the following requirements: (i) Requests for proposals must be publicized and identify all evaluation factors and their relative importance. Proposals must be solicited from an adequate number of qualified offerors. Any response to publicized requests for proposals must be considered to the maximum extent practical; (ii) The non-Federal entity must have a written method for conducting technical evaluations of the proposals received and making selections; (iii) Contracts must be awarded to the responsible offeror whose proposal is most advantageous to the non-Federal entity, with price and other factors considered; and (iv) The non-Federal entity may use competitive proposal procedures for qualifications-based procurement of architectural/engineering (A/E) professional services whereby offeror's qualifications are evaluated and the most qualified offeror is selected, subject to negotiation of fair and reasonable compensation. The method, where price is not used as a selection factor, can only be used in procurement of A/E professional services. It cannot be used to purchase other types of services though A/E firms that are a potential source to perform the proposed effort. . . . Indiana Code 5-22-8-3 states in part: "(a) This section applies only if the purchasing agent expects the purchase to be: (1) at least fifty thousand dollars ($50,000); and (2) not more than one hundred fifty thousand dollars ($150,000). . . . (d) If the purchasing agent receives a satisfactory quote, the purchasing agent shall award a contract to the lowest responsible and responsive offeror for each line or class of supplies required. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause Management had not established an effective system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance or that supporting documentation would have been maintained and made available for audit with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Effect The failure to establish an effective internal control system and retain and provide supporting documentation prevented the determination of the School Corporation's compliance with compliance requirement listed above. The failure to design and implement an effective system of internal controls enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure that documentation will be maintained and made available for audit and to comply with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-004 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, COVID-19 - School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, COVID-19 - National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children, COVID-19 - Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 20/21, FY 21/22 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2020-006. Condition and Context Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000. However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold of $150,000 or less for when small purchase procedures may be used. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micropurchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. Micro-Purchases A sample of 40 micro-purchase procurements from the School Lunch fund was selected for testing to verify proper procurement methods were followed. There were 11 micro-purchase procurements, totaling $7,602, that were paid for which the School Corporation could not provide documentation to support the purchase. As such, the 11 transactions could not be verified as properly procured. Due to the number and magnitude of exceptions, per auditor judgment, we concluded it would not be appropriate to examine the remaining 24 micro-purchase procurements. Small Purchases The School Corporation could not provide supporting documentation that an adequate number of price or rate quotes was obtained to ensure full and open competition for two of six procurements under the small purchase threshold. Furthermore, vendor contracts were not entered into for two total purchases above $50,000 as required by state statute. As a result, vendors subject to contracts were not verified for suspension and debarment to ensure vendors were not suspended or debarred from participation in federal award programs. Exceeds Simplified Acquisition The School Corporation did not follow procurement requirements for purchases of commodities which exceeded the simplified acquisition threshold of $150,000. The School Corporation could not provide supporting documentation that a contract was procured for Gordon Food Service for fiscal year 2020-2021. As a result, vendors subject to contracts were not verified for suspension and debarment to ensure vendors were not suspended or debarred from participation in federal award programs. The lack of internal controls, availability of supporting documentation, and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(a) (Uniform Guidance) states: "The non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable State, local, and tribal laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal law and the standards identified in this part." 2 CFR 200.318(a) (Revised Uniform Guidance) states: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The nonFederal entity's documented procurement procedures must confirm to the procurement standards identified in ?? 200.317 through 200.327." 2 CFR 200.318(i) states: "The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and ?? 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in ? 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: (1) Micro-purchases - (i) Distribution. The acquisition of supplies or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold ( . . . ? 200.1) To the maximum extent practicable, the non-Federal entity should distribute micro-purchases equitably among qualified suppliers. (ii) Micro-purchase awards. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price or rate quotations if the non-Federal entity considers the price to be reasonable based on research, experience, purchase history or other information and documents it files accordingly. Purchase cards can be used for micro-purchases if procedures are documented and approved by the non-Federal entity. . . . (2) Small purchases - (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . . (b) Formal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal financial assistance award exceeds the SAT, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require following documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a non-competitive procurement can be used in accordance with ? 200.319 or paragraph (c) of this section. The following formal methods of procurement are used for procurement of property or services above the simplified acquisition threshold or a value below the simplified acquisition threshold the non-Federal entity determines to be appropriate: (1) Sealed bids. A procurement method in which bids are publicly solicited and a firm fixed-price contract (lump sum or unit price) is awarded to the responsible bidder whose bid, conforming with all the material terms and conditions of the invitation for bids, is the lowest in price. The sealed bids method is the preferred method for procuring construction, if the conditions. (i) In order for sealed bidding to be feasible, the following conditions should be present: (A) A complete, adequate, and realistic specification or purchase description is available; (B) Two or more responsible bidders are willing and able to compete effectively for the business; and (C) The procurement lends itself to a firm fixed price contract and the selection of the successful bidder can be made principally on the basis of price. (ii) If sealed bids are used, the following requirements apply: (A) Bids must be solicited from an adequate number of qualified sources, providing them sufficient response time prior to the date set for opening the bids, for local, and tribal governments, the invitation for bids must be publicly advertised; (B) The invitation for bids, which will include any specifications and pertinent attachments, must define the items or services in order for the bidder to properly respond; (C) All bids will be opened at the time and place prescribed in the invitation for bids, and for local and tribal governments, the bids must be opened publicly; (D) A firm fixed price contract award will be made in writing to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder. Where specified in bidding documents, factors such as discounts, transportation cost, and life cycle costs must be considered in determining which bid is lowest. Payment discounts will only be used to determine the low bid when prior experience indicates that such discounts are usually taken advantage of; and (E) Any or all bids may be rejected if there is a sound documented reason. (2) Proposals. A procurement method in which either a fixed price or cost-reimbursement type contract is awarded. Proposals are generally used when conditions are not appropriate for the use of sealed bids. They are awarded in accordance with the following requirements: (i) Requests for proposals must be publicized and identify all evaluation factors and their relative importance. Proposals must be solicited from an adequate number of qualified offerors. Any response to publicized requests for proposals must be considered to the maximum extent practical; (ii) The non-Federal entity must have a written method for conducting technical evaluations of the proposals received and making selections; (iii) Contracts must be awarded to the responsible offeror whose proposal is most advantageous to the non-Federal entity, with price and other factors considered; and (iv) The non-Federal entity may use competitive proposal procedures for qualifications-based procurement of architectural/engineering (A/E) professional services whereby offeror's qualifications are evaluated and the most qualified offeror is selected, subject to negotiation of fair and reasonable compensation. The method, where price is not used as a selection factor, can only be used in procurement of A/E professional services. It cannot be used to purchase other types of services though A/E firms that are a potential source to perform the proposed effort. . . . Indiana Code 5-22-8-3 states in part: "(a) This section applies only if the purchasing agent expects the purchase to be: (1) at least fifty thousand dollars ($50,000); and (2) not more than one hundred fifty thousand dollars ($150,000). . . . (d) If the purchasing agent receives a satisfactory quote, the purchasing agent shall award a contract to the lowest responsible and responsive offeror for each line or class of supplies required. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause Management had not established an effective system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance or that supporting documentation would have been maintained and made available for audit with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Effect The failure to establish an effective internal control system and retain and provide supporting documentation prevented the determination of the School Corporation's compliance with compliance requirement listed above. The failure to design and implement an effective system of internal controls enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure that documentation will be maintained and made available for audit and to comply with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-004 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, COVID-19 - School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, COVID-19 - National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children, COVID-19 - Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 20/21, FY 21/22 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2020-006. Condition and Context Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000. However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold of $150,000 or less for when small purchase procedures may be used. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micropurchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. Micro-Purchases A sample of 40 micro-purchase procurements from the School Lunch fund was selected for testing to verify proper procurement methods were followed. There were 11 micro-purchase procurements, totaling $7,602, that were paid for which the School Corporation could not provide documentation to support the purchase. As such, the 11 transactions could not be verified as properly procured. Due to the number and magnitude of exceptions, per auditor judgment, we concluded it would not be appropriate to examine the remaining 24 micro-purchase procurements. Small Purchases The School Corporation could not provide supporting documentation that an adequate number of price or rate quotes was obtained to ensure full and open competition for two of six procurements under the small purchase threshold. Furthermore, vendor contracts were not entered into for two total purchases above $50,000 as required by state statute. As a result, vendors subject to contracts were not verified for suspension and debarment to ensure vendors were not suspended or debarred from participation in federal award programs. Exceeds Simplified Acquisition The School Corporation did not follow procurement requirements for purchases of commodities which exceeded the simplified acquisition threshold of $150,000. The School Corporation could not provide supporting documentation that a contract was procured for Gordon Food Service for fiscal year 2020-2021. As a result, vendors subject to contracts were not verified for suspension and debarment to ensure vendors were not suspended or debarred from participation in federal award programs. The lack of internal controls, availability of supporting documentation, and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(a) (Uniform Guidance) states: "The non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable State, local, and tribal laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal law and the standards identified in this part." 2 CFR 200.318(a) (Revised Uniform Guidance) states: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The nonFederal entity's documented procurement procedures must confirm to the procurement standards identified in ?? 200.317 through 200.327." 2 CFR 200.318(i) states: "The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and ?? 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in ? 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: (1) Micro-purchases - (i) Distribution. The acquisition of supplies or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold ( . . . ? 200.1) To the maximum extent practicable, the non-Federal entity should distribute micro-purchases equitably among qualified suppliers. (ii) Micro-purchase awards. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price or rate quotations if the non-Federal entity considers the price to be reasonable based on research, experience, purchase history or other information and documents it files accordingly. Purchase cards can be used for micro-purchases if procedures are documented and approved by the non-Federal entity. . . . (2) Small purchases - (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . . (b) Formal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal financial assistance award exceeds the SAT, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require following documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a non-competitive procurement can be used in accordance with ? 200.319 or paragraph (c) of this section. The following formal methods of procurement are used for procurement of property or services above the simplified acquisition threshold or a value below the simplified acquisition threshold the non-Federal entity determines to be appropriate: (1) Sealed bids. A procurement method in which bids are publicly solicited and a firm fixed-price contract (lump sum or unit price) is awarded to the responsible bidder whose bid, conforming with all the material terms and conditions of the invitation for bids, is the lowest in price. The sealed bids method is the preferred method for procuring construction, if the conditions. (i) In order for sealed bidding to be feasible, the following conditions should be present: (A) A complete, adequate, and realistic specification or purchase description is available; (B) Two or more responsible bidders are willing and able to compete effectively for the business; and (C) The procurement lends itself to a firm fixed price contract and the selection of the successful bidder can be made principally on the basis of price. (ii) If sealed bids are used, the following requirements apply: (A) Bids must be solicited from an adequate number of qualified sources, providing them sufficient response time prior to the date set for opening the bids, for local, and tribal governments, the invitation for bids must be publicly advertised; (B) The invitation for bids, which will include any specifications and pertinent attachments, must define the items or services in order for the bidder to properly respond; (C) All bids will be opened at the time and place prescribed in the invitation for bids, and for local and tribal governments, the bids must be opened publicly; (D) A firm fixed price contract award will be made in writing to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder. Where specified in bidding documents, factors such as discounts, transportation cost, and life cycle costs must be considered in determining which bid is lowest. Payment discounts will only be used to determine the low bid when prior experience indicates that such discounts are usually taken advantage of; and (E) Any or all bids may be rejected if there is a sound documented reason. (2) Proposals. A procurement method in which either a fixed price or cost-reimbursement type contract is awarded. Proposals are generally used when conditions are not appropriate for the use of sealed bids. They are awarded in accordance with the following requirements: (i) Requests for proposals must be publicized and identify all evaluation factors and their relative importance. Proposals must be solicited from an adequate number of qualified offerors. Any response to publicized requests for proposals must be considered to the maximum extent practical; (ii) The non-Federal entity must have a written method for conducting technical evaluations of the proposals received and making selections; (iii) Contracts must be awarded to the responsible offeror whose proposal is most advantageous to the non-Federal entity, with price and other factors considered; and (iv) The non-Federal entity may use competitive proposal procedures for qualifications-based procurement of architectural/engineering (A/E) professional services whereby offeror's qualifications are evaluated and the most qualified offeror is selected, subject to negotiation of fair and reasonable compensation. The method, where price is not used as a selection factor, can only be used in procurement of A/E professional services. It cannot be used to purchase other types of services though A/E firms that are a potential source to perform the proposed effort. . . . Indiana Code 5-22-8-3 states in part: "(a) This section applies only if the purchasing agent expects the purchase to be: (1) at least fifty thousand dollars ($50,000); and (2) not more than one hundred fifty thousand dollars ($150,000). . . . (d) If the purchasing agent receives a satisfactory quote, the purchasing agent shall award a contract to the lowest responsible and responsive offeror for each line or class of supplies required. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause Management had not established an effective system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance or that supporting documentation would have been maintained and made available for audit with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Effect The failure to establish an effective internal control system and retain and provide supporting documentation prevented the determination of the School Corporation's compliance with compliance requirement listed above. The failure to design and implement an effective system of internal controls enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure that documentation will be maintained and made available for audit and to comply with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
Condition and Criteria: 2 CFR 200.318 states non-federal entities must have and use documented procurement procedures for the acquisition of property or services required under a federal award or subaward. The Institute does not have a documented procurement policy. Cause: The Institute does not make significant purchases of goods or services and therefore the lack of a procurement policy was an administrative oversight. Effect: The Institute is not in compliance with the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs associated with this finding. Identification of a Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Auditors? Recommendation: We recommend the Institute implement procurement policies and evaluate these procedures on an annual basis to determine if additional enhancements should be made or new policies created. Views of Responsible Officials: See attachment for the Institute?s corrective action plan.
Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, COVID-19 - School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, COVID-19 - National School Lunch Program Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 2020-21, FY 2021-22 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2020-004. Condition and Context An effective internal controls system was not designed, nor implemented at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Procurement When the value of procurement of property or services exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold, customarily set at $250,000, a formal bid process must take place and a contract must be awarded. Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold of $250,000. However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold of $150,000 or less for when small purchase procedures may be used. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. During fiscal year 2020-2021, the School Corporation purchased food and supply items from two vendors with total purchases that fell within the small purchase threshold. During 2021-2022, repair services were purchased from one vendor that fell within the small purchase threshold. Quotes were not obtained nor was full and open competition provided for the three vendors that fell within the small purchase threshold during the audit period. Additionally, there was no documentation available to support the rationale to limit competition. During 2020-2021 the School Corporation did not follow procurement requirements for purchases of food and supply items which exceeded the simplified acquisition threshold of $150,000. The School Corporation did not correctly procure a contract for the one vendor that exceeded the simplified acquisition threshold. The School Corporation only considered one bid which did not adequately meet the formal procurement procedures for a simplified acquisition. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 14 BROWNSTOWN CENTRAL COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Suspension and Debarment Non-federal entities and contractors are subject to non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations. These regulations restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or are ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. This is done by checking SAM Exclusions, collecting a certification from that person, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. The School Corporation did not verify that one of four contracts over $25,000 was not excluded or disqualified from participation in federal award programs. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(i) states: "The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price." 2 CFR 200.320 (Uniform Guidance) states in part: "(b) Procurement by small purchase procedures. Small purchase procedures are those relatively simple and informal procurement methods for securing services, supplies, or other property that do not cost more than the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. (c) Procurement by sealed bids (formal advertising). Bids are publicly solicited and a firm fixed price contract (lump sum or unit price) is awarded to the responsible bidder whose bid, conforming with all the material terms and conditions of the invitation for bids, is the lowest in price. . . . (d) Procurement by competitive proposals. The technique of competitive proposals is normally conducted with more than one source submitting an offer, and either a fixed price or cost reimbursement type contract is awarded. It is generally used when conditions are not appropriate for the use of sealed bids. . . . " INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 15 BROWNSTOWN CENTRAL COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 2 CFR 200.320 (Revised Uniform Guidance) states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use document procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and ?? 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the Simplified Acquisition Threshold (SAT), as defined in ? 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases - (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states in part: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause Management had not established a system of internal control that would have ensured compliance with the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Effect The failure to design and implement an effective internal control system enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 16 BROWNSTOWN CENTRAL COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure compliance and comply with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, COVID-19 - School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, COVID-19 - National School Lunch Program Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 2020-21, FY 2021-22 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2020-004. Condition and Context An effective internal controls system was not designed, nor implemented at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Procurement When the value of procurement of property or services exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold, customarily set at $250,000, a formal bid process must take place and a contract must be awarded. Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold of $250,000. However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold of $150,000 or less for when small purchase procedures may be used. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. During fiscal year 2020-2021, the School Corporation purchased food and supply items from two vendors with total purchases that fell within the small purchase threshold. During 2021-2022, repair services were purchased from one vendor that fell within the small purchase threshold. Quotes were not obtained nor was full and open competition provided for the three vendors that fell within the small purchase threshold during the audit period. Additionally, there was no documentation available to support the rationale to limit competition. During 2020-2021 the School Corporation did not follow procurement requirements for purchases of food and supply items which exceeded the simplified acquisition threshold of $150,000. The School Corporation did not correctly procure a contract for the one vendor that exceeded the simplified acquisition threshold. The School Corporation only considered one bid which did not adequately meet the formal procurement procedures for a simplified acquisition. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 14 BROWNSTOWN CENTRAL COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Suspension and Debarment Non-federal entities and contractors are subject to non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations. These regulations restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or are ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. This is done by checking SAM Exclusions, collecting a certification from that person, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. The School Corporation did not verify that one of four contracts over $25,000 was not excluded or disqualified from participation in federal award programs. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(i) states: "The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price." 2 CFR 200.320 (Uniform Guidance) states in part: "(b) Procurement by small purchase procedures. Small purchase procedures are those relatively simple and informal procurement methods for securing services, supplies, or other property that do not cost more than the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. (c) Procurement by sealed bids (formal advertising). Bids are publicly solicited and a firm fixed price contract (lump sum or unit price) is awarded to the responsible bidder whose bid, conforming with all the material terms and conditions of the invitation for bids, is the lowest in price. . . . (d) Procurement by competitive proposals. The technique of competitive proposals is normally conducted with more than one source submitting an offer, and either a fixed price or cost reimbursement type contract is awarded. It is generally used when conditions are not appropriate for the use of sealed bids. . . . " INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 15 BROWNSTOWN CENTRAL COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 2 CFR 200.320 (Revised Uniform Guidance) states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use document procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and ?? 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the Simplified Acquisition Threshold (SAT), as defined in ? 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases - (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states in part: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause Management had not established a system of internal control that would have ensured compliance with the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Effect The failure to design and implement an effective internal control system enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 16 BROWNSTOWN CENTRAL COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure compliance and comply with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, COVID-19 - School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, COVID-19 - National School Lunch Program Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 2020-21, FY 2021-22 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2020-004. Condition and Context An effective internal controls system was not designed, nor implemented at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Procurement When the value of procurement of property or services exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold, customarily set at $250,000, a formal bid process must take place and a contract must be awarded. Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold of $250,000. However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold of $150,000 or less for when small purchase procedures may be used. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. During fiscal year 2020-2021, the School Corporation purchased food and supply items from two vendors with total purchases that fell within the small purchase threshold. During 2021-2022, repair services were purchased from one vendor that fell within the small purchase threshold. Quotes were not obtained nor was full and open competition provided for the three vendors that fell within the small purchase threshold during the audit period. Additionally, there was no documentation available to support the rationale to limit competition. During 2020-2021 the School Corporation did not follow procurement requirements for purchases of food and supply items which exceeded the simplified acquisition threshold of $150,000. The School Corporation did not correctly procure a contract for the one vendor that exceeded the simplified acquisition threshold. The School Corporation only considered one bid which did not adequately meet the formal procurement procedures for a simplified acquisition. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 14 BROWNSTOWN CENTRAL COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Suspension and Debarment Non-federal entities and contractors are subject to non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations. These regulations restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or are ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. This is done by checking SAM Exclusions, collecting a certification from that person, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. The School Corporation did not verify that one of four contracts over $25,000 was not excluded or disqualified from participation in federal award programs. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(i) states: "The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price." 2 CFR 200.320 (Uniform Guidance) states in part: "(b) Procurement by small purchase procedures. Small purchase procedures are those relatively simple and informal procurement methods for securing services, supplies, or other property that do not cost more than the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. (c) Procurement by sealed bids (formal advertising). Bids are publicly solicited and a firm fixed price contract (lump sum or unit price) is awarded to the responsible bidder whose bid, conforming with all the material terms and conditions of the invitation for bids, is the lowest in price. . . . (d) Procurement by competitive proposals. The technique of competitive proposals is normally conducted with more than one source submitting an offer, and either a fixed price or cost reimbursement type contract is awarded. It is generally used when conditions are not appropriate for the use of sealed bids. . . . " INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 15 BROWNSTOWN CENTRAL COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 2 CFR 200.320 (Revised Uniform Guidance) states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use document procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and ?? 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the Simplified Acquisition Threshold (SAT), as defined in ? 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases - (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states in part: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause Management had not established a system of internal control that would have ensured compliance with the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Effect The failure to design and implement an effective internal control system enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 16 BROWNSTOWN CENTRAL COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure compliance and comply with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, COVID-19 - School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, COVID-19 - National School Lunch Program Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 2020-21, FY 2021-22 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2020-004. Condition and Context An effective internal controls system was not designed, nor implemented at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Procurement When the value of procurement of property or services exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold, customarily set at $250,000, a formal bid process must take place and a contract must be awarded. Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold of $250,000. However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold of $150,000 or less for when small purchase procedures may be used. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. During fiscal year 2020-2021, the School Corporation purchased food and supply items from two vendors with total purchases that fell within the small purchase threshold. During 2021-2022, repair services were purchased from one vendor that fell within the small purchase threshold. Quotes were not obtained nor was full and open competition provided for the three vendors that fell within the small purchase threshold during the audit period. Additionally, there was no documentation available to support the rationale to limit competition. During 2020-2021 the School Corporation did not follow procurement requirements for purchases of food and supply items which exceeded the simplified acquisition threshold of $150,000. The School Corporation did not correctly procure a contract for the one vendor that exceeded the simplified acquisition threshold. The School Corporation only considered one bid which did not adequately meet the formal procurement procedures for a simplified acquisition. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 14 BROWNSTOWN CENTRAL COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Suspension and Debarment Non-federal entities and contractors are subject to non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations. These regulations restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or are ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. This is done by checking SAM Exclusions, collecting a certification from that person, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. The School Corporation did not verify that one of four contracts over $25,000 was not excluded or disqualified from participation in federal award programs. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(i) states: "The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price." 2 CFR 200.320 (Uniform Guidance) states in part: "(b) Procurement by small purchase procedures. Small purchase procedures are those relatively simple and informal procurement methods for securing services, supplies, or other property that do not cost more than the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. (c) Procurement by sealed bids (formal advertising). Bids are publicly solicited and a firm fixed price contract (lump sum or unit price) is awarded to the responsible bidder whose bid, conforming with all the material terms and conditions of the invitation for bids, is the lowest in price. . . . (d) Procurement by competitive proposals. The technique of competitive proposals is normally conducted with more than one source submitting an offer, and either a fixed price or cost reimbursement type contract is awarded. It is generally used when conditions are not appropriate for the use of sealed bids. . . . " INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 15 BROWNSTOWN CENTRAL COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 2 CFR 200.320 (Revised Uniform Guidance) states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use document procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and ?? 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the Simplified Acquisition Threshold (SAT), as defined in ? 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases - (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states in part: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause Management had not established a system of internal control that would have ensured compliance with the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Effect The failure to design and implement an effective internal control system enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 16 BROWNSTOWN CENTRAL COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure compliance and comply with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, COVID-19 - School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, COVID-19 - National School Lunch Program Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 2020-21, FY 2021-22 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2020-004. Condition and Context An effective internal controls system was not designed, nor implemented at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Procurement When the value of procurement of property or services exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold, customarily set at $250,000, a formal bid process must take place and a contract must be awarded. Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold of $250,000. However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold of $150,000 or less for when small purchase procedures may be used. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. During fiscal year 2020-2021, the School Corporation purchased food and supply items from two vendors with total purchases that fell within the small purchase threshold. During 2021-2022, repair services were purchased from one vendor that fell within the small purchase threshold. Quotes were not obtained nor was full and open competition provided for the three vendors that fell within the small purchase threshold during the audit period. Additionally, there was no documentation available to support the rationale to limit competition. During 2020-2021 the School Corporation did not follow procurement requirements for purchases of food and supply items which exceeded the simplified acquisition threshold of $150,000. The School Corporation did not correctly procure a contract for the one vendor that exceeded the simplified acquisition threshold. The School Corporation only considered one bid which did not adequately meet the formal procurement procedures for a simplified acquisition. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 14 BROWNSTOWN CENTRAL COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Suspension and Debarment Non-federal entities and contractors are subject to non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations. These regulations restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or are ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. This is done by checking SAM Exclusions, collecting a certification from that person, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. The School Corporation did not verify that one of four contracts over $25,000 was not excluded or disqualified from participation in federal award programs. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(i) states: "The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price." 2 CFR 200.320 (Uniform Guidance) states in part: "(b) Procurement by small purchase procedures. Small purchase procedures are those relatively simple and informal procurement methods for securing services, supplies, or other property that do not cost more than the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. (c) Procurement by sealed bids (formal advertising). Bids are publicly solicited and a firm fixed price contract (lump sum or unit price) is awarded to the responsible bidder whose bid, conforming with all the material terms and conditions of the invitation for bids, is the lowest in price. . . . (d) Procurement by competitive proposals. The technique of competitive proposals is normally conducted with more than one source submitting an offer, and either a fixed price or cost reimbursement type contract is awarded. It is generally used when conditions are not appropriate for the use of sealed bids. . . . " INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 15 BROWNSTOWN CENTRAL COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 2 CFR 200.320 (Revised Uniform Guidance) states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use document procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and ?? 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the Simplified Acquisition Threshold (SAT), as defined in ? 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases - (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states in part: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause Management had not established a system of internal control that would have ensured compliance with the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Effect The failure to design and implement an effective internal control system enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 16 BROWNSTOWN CENTRAL COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure compliance and comply with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.