FA 2022-001 Strengthen Controls over Expenditures Compliance Requirements: Activities Allowed or Unallowed Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Internal Control Impact: Significant Deficiency Compliance Impact: Nonmaterial Noncompliance Federal Awarding Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-Through Entity: Georgia Department of Education AL Numbers and Titles: COVID-19 ? 84.425D ? Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund COVID-19 ? 84.425U ? American Rescue Plan Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund COVID-19 ? 84.425W ? American Rescue Plan Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund Federal Award Numbers: S425D200012 (Year: 2020), S425D210012 (Year: 2021), S425U210012 (Year: 2021), S425W210011 (Year: 2021) Questioned Costs: $99,748 Description: The policies and procedures of the School District were insufficient to provide adequate internal controls over expenditures as it relates to the Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund program. Background: On March 27, 2020, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act was signed into law. The CARES Act was designed to mitigate the economic effects of the COVID-19 pandemic in a variety of ways, including providing additional funding for local educational agencies (LEAs) navigating the impact of the COVID-19 outbreak. Provisions included in Title VIII of the CARES Act created the Education Stabilization Fund to provide financial resources to educational entities to prevent, prepare for, and respond to the coronavirus. The CARES Act allocated $30.75 billion, the Coronavirus Response and Relief Supplemental Appropriations Act allocated an additional $81.9 billion, and the American Rescue Plan Act added $165.1 billion in funding to the Education Stabilization Fund. Multiple Education Stabilization Fund subprograms were created and allotted funding through the various COVID-19-related legislation. Of these programs, the Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER) Fund was created to address the impact that COVID-19 has had, and continues to have, on elementary and secondary schools across the nation. ESSER funding was granted to the Georgia Department of Education (GaDOE) by the U.S. Department of Education (ED). GaDOE is responsible for distributing funds to LEAs and overseeing the expenditure of funds by LEAs. ESSER funds totaling $13,647,015 were expended and reported on the Polk County School District?s Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) for fiscal year 2022. Criteria: As a recipient of federal awards, the Institution is required to establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance of managing the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal awards pursuant to Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), Section 200.303 ? Internal Controls. Provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.403 ? Factors Affecting Allowability of Costs state that ?costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles, (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items, (c) Be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the non-Federal entity? (g) Be adequately documented?? In addition, provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 202.403 ? Reasonable Costs state that ?a cost is reasonable if, in its nature and amount, it does not exceed that which would be incurred by a prudent person under the circumstances prevailing at the time the decision was made to incur the cost. The question of reasonableness is particularly important when the non-Federal entity is predominantly federally-funded. In determining reasonableness of a given cost, consideration must be given to: (a) Whether the cost is of a type generally recognized as ordinary and necessary for the operation of the non-Federal entity or the proper and efficient performance of the Federal award. (b) The restraints or requirements imposed by such factors as: sound business practices; arm?s-length bargaining; Federal, state, local, tribal, and other laws and regulations; and terms and conditions of the Federal award? (d) Whether the individuals concerned acted with prudence in the circumstances considering their responsibilities to the non-Federal entity, its employees, where applicable its students or membership, the public at large, and the Federal Government. (e) Whether the non-Federal entity significantly deviates from its established practices and policies regarding the incurrence of costs, which may unjustifiably increase the Federal award?s cost.? Furthermore, provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.318 ? General Procurement Standards state that ?the non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations? for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward?? Condition: Auditors performed a review of expenditure activity associated with the ESSER program to determine if appropriate internal controls were implemented and applicable compliance requirements were met. This testing revealed the following deficiencies: ? Bonuses totaling $37,327 were paid to individuals who were not employees of the School District. These individuals were hired to perform specific functions as detailed within the associated contracts and were paid amounts in excess of the stated rate noted within these contracts. ? A payment in the amount of $62,421 was made to the janitorial company utilized by the School District to provide bonuses to janitorial contractors who were not employees of the School District. These individuals were assigned to work within the School District by the private janitorial company. Per review of the contract in place during the fiscal year under review, it was noted that these bonuses represented amounts in excess of the agreed upon price. Therefore, expenditures totaling $99,748 were not considered to be reasonable and necessary for the performance of the ESSER program and deemed unallowable. Questioned Costs: Known questioned costs of $99,748 were identified for expenditures that were not incurred for a necessary and reasonable purpose and did not follow the School District?s policies and procedures. These known questioned costs related to expenditures that were not tested as part of a sample, and therefore, should not be projected to a population to determine likely questioned costs. Cause: Per discussion with management, the School District believed that the expenditures were allowable as the expenditures were approved by GaDOE through the Consolidated Application process; however, they were not aware that contract amendments should be initiated prior to the expenditure of funds in this manner. Effect or Potential Effect: The School District is not in compliance with the Uniform Guidance, ED, or GaDOE guidance related to the ESSER program. Failure to ensure that appropriate policies and procedures are followed when expending federal funds may expose the School District to unnecessary financial strains and shortages as GaDOE may require the School District to return funds associated with unallowable expenditures. Recommendation: The School District should review current internal control procedures related to ESSER program expenditures. Where vulnerable, the School District should develop and/or modify its policies and procedures to ensure that expenditures are in line with provisions reflected within the associated contract and/or contract amendments. In addition, the School District should implement a monitoring process to ensure that all expenditures are compliant with the School District?s purchasing and employee compensation policies and procedures. Views of Responsible Officials: We concur with this finding.
FA 2022-001 Strengthen Controls over Expenditures Compliance Requirements: Activities Allowed or Unallowed Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Internal Control Impact: Significant Deficiency Compliance Impact: Nonmaterial Noncompliance Federal Awarding Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-Through Entity: Georgia Department of Education AL Numbers and Titles: COVID-19 ? 84.425D ? Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund COVID-19 ? 84.425U ? American Rescue Plan Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund COVID-19 ? 84.425W ? American Rescue Plan Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund Federal Award Numbers: S425D200012 (Year: 2020), S425D210012 (Year: 2021), S425U210012 (Year: 2021), S425W210011 (Year: 2021) Questioned Costs: $99,748 Description: The policies and procedures of the School District were insufficient to provide adequate internal controls over expenditures as it relates to the Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund program. Background: On March 27, 2020, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act was signed into law. The CARES Act was designed to mitigate the economic effects of the COVID-19 pandemic in a variety of ways, including providing additional funding for local educational agencies (LEAs) navigating the impact of the COVID-19 outbreak. Provisions included in Title VIII of the CARES Act created the Education Stabilization Fund to provide financial resources to educational entities to prevent, prepare for, and respond to the coronavirus. The CARES Act allocated $30.75 billion, the Coronavirus Response and Relief Supplemental Appropriations Act allocated an additional $81.9 billion, and the American Rescue Plan Act added $165.1 billion in funding to the Education Stabilization Fund. Multiple Education Stabilization Fund subprograms were created and allotted funding through the various COVID-19-related legislation. Of these programs, the Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER) Fund was created to address the impact that COVID-19 has had, and continues to have, on elementary and secondary schools across the nation. ESSER funding was granted to the Georgia Department of Education (GaDOE) by the U.S. Department of Education (ED). GaDOE is responsible for distributing funds to LEAs and overseeing the expenditure of funds by LEAs. ESSER funds totaling $13,647,015 were expended and reported on the Polk County School District?s Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) for fiscal year 2022. Criteria: As a recipient of federal awards, the Institution is required to establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance of managing the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal awards pursuant to Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), Section 200.303 ? Internal Controls. Provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.403 ? Factors Affecting Allowability of Costs state that ?costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles, (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items, (c) Be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the non-Federal entity? (g) Be adequately documented?? In addition, provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 202.403 ? Reasonable Costs state that ?a cost is reasonable if, in its nature and amount, it does not exceed that which would be incurred by a prudent person under the circumstances prevailing at the time the decision was made to incur the cost. The question of reasonableness is particularly important when the non-Federal entity is predominantly federally-funded. In determining reasonableness of a given cost, consideration must be given to: (a) Whether the cost is of a type generally recognized as ordinary and necessary for the operation of the non-Federal entity or the proper and efficient performance of the Federal award. (b) The restraints or requirements imposed by such factors as: sound business practices; arm?s-length bargaining; Federal, state, local, tribal, and other laws and regulations; and terms and conditions of the Federal award? (d) Whether the individuals concerned acted with prudence in the circumstances considering their responsibilities to the non-Federal entity, its employees, where applicable its students or membership, the public at large, and the Federal Government. (e) Whether the non-Federal entity significantly deviates from its established practices and policies regarding the incurrence of costs, which may unjustifiably increase the Federal award?s cost.? Furthermore, provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.318 ? General Procurement Standards state that ?the non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations? for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward?? Condition: Auditors performed a review of expenditure activity associated with the ESSER program to determine if appropriate internal controls were implemented and applicable compliance requirements were met. This testing revealed the following deficiencies: ? Bonuses totaling $37,327 were paid to individuals who were not employees of the School District. These individuals were hired to perform specific functions as detailed within the associated contracts and were paid amounts in excess of the stated rate noted within these contracts. ? A payment in the amount of $62,421 was made to the janitorial company utilized by the School District to provide bonuses to janitorial contractors who were not employees of the School District. These individuals were assigned to work within the School District by the private janitorial company. Per review of the contract in place during the fiscal year under review, it was noted that these bonuses represented amounts in excess of the agreed upon price. Therefore, expenditures totaling $99,748 were not considered to be reasonable and necessary for the performance of the ESSER program and deemed unallowable. Questioned Costs: Known questioned costs of $99,748 were identified for expenditures that were not incurred for a necessary and reasonable purpose and did not follow the School District?s policies and procedures. These known questioned costs related to expenditures that were not tested as part of a sample, and therefore, should not be projected to a population to determine likely questioned costs. Cause: Per discussion with management, the School District believed that the expenditures were allowable as the expenditures were approved by GaDOE through the Consolidated Application process; however, they were not aware that contract amendments should be initiated prior to the expenditure of funds in this manner. Effect or Potential Effect: The School District is not in compliance with the Uniform Guidance, ED, or GaDOE guidance related to the ESSER program. Failure to ensure that appropriate policies and procedures are followed when expending federal funds may expose the School District to unnecessary financial strains and shortages as GaDOE may require the School District to return funds associated with unallowable expenditures. Recommendation: The School District should review current internal control procedures related to ESSER program expenditures. Where vulnerable, the School District should develop and/or modify its policies and procedures to ensure that expenditures are in line with provisions reflected within the associated contract and/or contract amendments. In addition, the School District should implement a monitoring process to ensure that all expenditures are compliant with the School District?s purchasing and employee compensation policies and procedures. Views of Responsible Officials: We concur with this finding.
FA 2022-001 Strengthen Controls over Expenditures Compliance Requirements: Activities Allowed or Unallowed Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Internal Control Impact: Significant Deficiency Compliance Impact: Nonmaterial Noncompliance Federal Awarding Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-Through Entity: Georgia Department of Education AL Numbers and Titles: COVID-19 ? 84.425D ? Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund COVID-19 ? 84.425U ? American Rescue Plan Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund COVID-19 ? 84.425W ? American Rescue Plan Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund Federal Award Numbers: S425D200012 (Year: 2020), S425D210012 (Year: 2021), S425U210012 (Year: 2021), S425W210011 (Year: 2021) Questioned Costs: $99,748 Description: The policies and procedures of the School District were insufficient to provide adequate internal controls over expenditures as it relates to the Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund program. Background: On March 27, 2020, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act was signed into law. The CARES Act was designed to mitigate the economic effects of the COVID-19 pandemic in a variety of ways, including providing additional funding for local educational agencies (LEAs) navigating the impact of the COVID-19 outbreak. Provisions included in Title VIII of the CARES Act created the Education Stabilization Fund to provide financial resources to educational entities to prevent, prepare for, and respond to the coronavirus. The CARES Act allocated $30.75 billion, the Coronavirus Response and Relief Supplemental Appropriations Act allocated an additional $81.9 billion, and the American Rescue Plan Act added $165.1 billion in funding to the Education Stabilization Fund. Multiple Education Stabilization Fund subprograms were created and allotted funding through the various COVID-19-related legislation. Of these programs, the Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER) Fund was created to address the impact that COVID-19 has had, and continues to have, on elementary and secondary schools across the nation. ESSER funding was granted to the Georgia Department of Education (GaDOE) by the U.S. Department of Education (ED). GaDOE is responsible for distributing funds to LEAs and overseeing the expenditure of funds by LEAs. ESSER funds totaling $13,647,015 were expended and reported on the Polk County School District?s Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) for fiscal year 2022. Criteria: As a recipient of federal awards, the Institution is required to establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance of managing the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal awards pursuant to Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), Section 200.303 ? Internal Controls. Provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.403 ? Factors Affecting Allowability of Costs state that ?costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles, (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items, (c) Be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the non-Federal entity? (g) Be adequately documented?? In addition, provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 202.403 ? Reasonable Costs state that ?a cost is reasonable if, in its nature and amount, it does not exceed that which would be incurred by a prudent person under the circumstances prevailing at the time the decision was made to incur the cost. The question of reasonableness is particularly important when the non-Federal entity is predominantly federally-funded. In determining reasonableness of a given cost, consideration must be given to: (a) Whether the cost is of a type generally recognized as ordinary and necessary for the operation of the non-Federal entity or the proper and efficient performance of the Federal award. (b) The restraints or requirements imposed by such factors as: sound business practices; arm?s-length bargaining; Federal, state, local, tribal, and other laws and regulations; and terms and conditions of the Federal award? (d) Whether the individuals concerned acted with prudence in the circumstances considering their responsibilities to the non-Federal entity, its employees, where applicable its students or membership, the public at large, and the Federal Government. (e) Whether the non-Federal entity significantly deviates from its established practices and policies regarding the incurrence of costs, which may unjustifiably increase the Federal award?s cost.? Furthermore, provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.318 ? General Procurement Standards state that ?the non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations? for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward?? Condition: Auditors performed a review of expenditure activity associated with the ESSER program to determine if appropriate internal controls were implemented and applicable compliance requirements were met. This testing revealed the following deficiencies: ? Bonuses totaling $37,327 were paid to individuals who were not employees of the School District. These individuals were hired to perform specific functions as detailed within the associated contracts and were paid amounts in excess of the stated rate noted within these contracts. ? A payment in the amount of $62,421 was made to the janitorial company utilized by the School District to provide bonuses to janitorial contractors who were not employees of the School District. These individuals were assigned to work within the School District by the private janitorial company. Per review of the contract in place during the fiscal year under review, it was noted that these bonuses represented amounts in excess of the agreed upon price. Therefore, expenditures totaling $99,748 were not considered to be reasonable and necessary for the performance of the ESSER program and deemed unallowable. Questioned Costs: Known questioned costs of $99,748 were identified for expenditures that were not incurred for a necessary and reasonable purpose and did not follow the School District?s policies and procedures. These known questioned costs related to expenditures that were not tested as part of a sample, and therefore, should not be projected to a population to determine likely questioned costs. Cause: Per discussion with management, the School District believed that the expenditures were allowable as the expenditures were approved by GaDOE through the Consolidated Application process; however, they were not aware that contract amendments should be initiated prior to the expenditure of funds in this manner. Effect or Potential Effect: The School District is not in compliance with the Uniform Guidance, ED, or GaDOE guidance related to the ESSER program. Failure to ensure that appropriate policies and procedures are followed when expending federal funds may expose the School District to unnecessary financial strains and shortages as GaDOE may require the School District to return funds associated with unallowable expenditures. Recommendation: The School District should review current internal control procedures related to ESSER program expenditures. Where vulnerable, the School District should develop and/or modify its policies and procedures to ensure that expenditures are in line with provisions reflected within the associated contract and/or contract amendments. In addition, the School District should implement a monitoring process to ensure that all expenditures are compliant with the School District?s purchasing and employee compensation policies and procedures. Views of Responsible Officials: We concur with this finding.
FA 2022-001 Strengthen Controls over Expenditures Compliance Requirements: Activities Allowed or Unallowed Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Internal Control Impact: Significant Deficiency Compliance Impact: Nonmaterial Noncompliance Federal Awarding Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-Through Entity: Georgia Department of Education AL Numbers and Titles: COVID-19 ? 84.425D ? Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund COVID-19 ? 84.425U ? American Rescue Plan Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund COVID-19 ? 84.425W ? American Rescue Plan Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund Federal Award Numbers: S425D200012 (Year: 2020), S425D210012 (Year: 2021), S425U210012 (Year: 2021), S425W210011 (Year: 2021) Questioned Costs: $99,748 Description: The policies and procedures of the School District were insufficient to provide adequate internal controls over expenditures as it relates to the Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund program. Background: On March 27, 2020, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act was signed into law. The CARES Act was designed to mitigate the economic effects of the COVID-19 pandemic in a variety of ways, including providing additional funding for local educational agencies (LEAs) navigating the impact of the COVID-19 outbreak. Provisions included in Title VIII of the CARES Act created the Education Stabilization Fund to provide financial resources to educational entities to prevent, prepare for, and respond to the coronavirus. The CARES Act allocated $30.75 billion, the Coronavirus Response and Relief Supplemental Appropriations Act allocated an additional $81.9 billion, and the American Rescue Plan Act added $165.1 billion in funding to the Education Stabilization Fund. Multiple Education Stabilization Fund subprograms were created and allotted funding through the various COVID-19-related legislation. Of these programs, the Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER) Fund was created to address the impact that COVID-19 has had, and continues to have, on elementary and secondary schools across the nation. ESSER funding was granted to the Georgia Department of Education (GaDOE) by the U.S. Department of Education (ED). GaDOE is responsible for distributing funds to LEAs and overseeing the expenditure of funds by LEAs. ESSER funds totaling $13,647,015 were expended and reported on the Polk County School District?s Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) for fiscal year 2022. Criteria: As a recipient of federal awards, the Institution is required to establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance of managing the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal awards pursuant to Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), Section 200.303 ? Internal Controls. Provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.403 ? Factors Affecting Allowability of Costs state that ?costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles, (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items, (c) Be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the non-Federal entity? (g) Be adequately documented?? In addition, provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 202.403 ? Reasonable Costs state that ?a cost is reasonable if, in its nature and amount, it does not exceed that which would be incurred by a prudent person under the circumstances prevailing at the time the decision was made to incur the cost. The question of reasonableness is particularly important when the non-Federal entity is predominantly federally-funded. In determining reasonableness of a given cost, consideration must be given to: (a) Whether the cost is of a type generally recognized as ordinary and necessary for the operation of the non-Federal entity or the proper and efficient performance of the Federal award. (b) The restraints or requirements imposed by such factors as: sound business practices; arm?s-length bargaining; Federal, state, local, tribal, and other laws and regulations; and terms and conditions of the Federal award? (d) Whether the individuals concerned acted with prudence in the circumstances considering their responsibilities to the non-Federal entity, its employees, where applicable its students or membership, the public at large, and the Federal Government. (e) Whether the non-Federal entity significantly deviates from its established practices and policies regarding the incurrence of costs, which may unjustifiably increase the Federal award?s cost.? Furthermore, provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.318 ? General Procurement Standards state that ?the non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations? for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward?? Condition: Auditors performed a review of expenditure activity associated with the ESSER program to determine if appropriate internal controls were implemented and applicable compliance requirements were met. This testing revealed the following deficiencies: ? Bonuses totaling $37,327 were paid to individuals who were not employees of the School District. These individuals were hired to perform specific functions as detailed within the associated contracts and were paid amounts in excess of the stated rate noted within these contracts. ? A payment in the amount of $62,421 was made to the janitorial company utilized by the School District to provide bonuses to janitorial contractors who were not employees of the School District. These individuals were assigned to work within the School District by the private janitorial company. Per review of the contract in place during the fiscal year under review, it was noted that these bonuses represented amounts in excess of the agreed upon price. Therefore, expenditures totaling $99,748 were not considered to be reasonable and necessary for the performance of the ESSER program and deemed unallowable. Questioned Costs: Known questioned costs of $99,748 were identified for expenditures that were not incurred for a necessary and reasonable purpose and did not follow the School District?s policies and procedures. These known questioned costs related to expenditures that were not tested as part of a sample, and therefore, should not be projected to a population to determine likely questioned costs. Cause: Per discussion with management, the School District believed that the expenditures were allowable as the expenditures were approved by GaDOE through the Consolidated Application process; however, they were not aware that contract amendments should be initiated prior to the expenditure of funds in this manner. Effect or Potential Effect: The School District is not in compliance with the Uniform Guidance, ED, or GaDOE guidance related to the ESSER program. Failure to ensure that appropriate policies and procedures are followed when expending federal funds may expose the School District to unnecessary financial strains and shortages as GaDOE may require the School District to return funds associated with unallowable expenditures. Recommendation: The School District should review current internal control procedures related to ESSER program expenditures. Where vulnerable, the School District should develop and/or modify its policies and procedures to ensure that expenditures are in line with provisions reflected within the associated contract and/or contract amendments. In addition, the School District should implement a monitoring process to ensure that all expenditures are compliant with the School District?s purchasing and employee compensation policies and procedures. Views of Responsible Officials: We concur with this finding.
FINDING 2022-004 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): FY 2021-2022 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Procurement The School Corporation did not obtain price or rate quotes for purchases of milk, bread, or food exceeding $10,000 from an adequate number of sources, which fell under the small purchase procedures. Two of the three vendors for small purchase procurements tested did not comply. Suspension and Debarment The School Corporation did not verify that vendors with contracts over $25,000 were not excluded or disqualified from participation in federal award programs. All four of the contracts tested did not comply. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were isolated to fiscal year 2021-2022. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318 states in part: "(a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in ?? 200.317 through 200.327. . . . (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use document procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and ?? 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the Simplified Acquisition Threshold (SAT), as defined in ? 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases - (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause Management had not established a system of internal control that would have ensured compliance with the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Effect The failure to design and implement an effective internal control system enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement could have resulted in the loss of federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal control to ensure compliance and comply with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-004 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): FY 2021-2022 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Procurement The School Corporation did not obtain price or rate quotes for purchases of milk, bread, or food exceeding $10,000 from an adequate number of sources, which fell under the small purchase procedures. Two of the three vendors for small purchase procurements tested did not comply. Suspension and Debarment The School Corporation did not verify that vendors with contracts over $25,000 were not excluded or disqualified from participation in federal award programs. All four of the contracts tested did not comply. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were isolated to fiscal year 2021-2022. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318 states in part: "(a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in ?? 200.317 through 200.327. . . . (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use document procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and ?? 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the Simplified Acquisition Threshold (SAT), as defined in ? 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases - (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause Management had not established a system of internal control that would have ensured compliance with the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Effect The failure to design and implement an effective internal control system enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement could have resulted in the loss of federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal control to ensure compliance and comply with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-004 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): FY 2021-2022 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Procurement The School Corporation did not obtain price or rate quotes for purchases of milk, bread, or food exceeding $10,000 from an adequate number of sources, which fell under the small purchase procedures. Two of the three vendors for small purchase procurements tested did not comply. Suspension and Debarment The School Corporation did not verify that vendors with contracts over $25,000 were not excluded or disqualified from participation in federal award programs. All four of the contracts tested did not comply. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were isolated to fiscal year 2021-2022. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318 states in part: "(a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in ?? 200.317 through 200.327. . . . (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use document procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and ?? 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the Simplified Acquisition Threshold (SAT), as defined in ? 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases - (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause Management had not established a system of internal control that would have ensured compliance with the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Effect The failure to design and implement an effective internal control system enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement could have resulted in the loss of federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal control to ensure compliance and comply with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
Program: Child Nutrition Cluster CFDA Number: 10.555, 10.553 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Pass-through: California Department of Education Award Year: 2021-2022 Compliance Requirement(s): Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment Type of Finding: Material Weakness, Instance of Noncompliance Criteria Per the 2 CFR 200.318(a), non-Federal entities other than States, including those operating Federal programs as subrecipients of States, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.327. The non-Federal entity must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200 (Uniform Guidance). Condition As a result of the test work performed over the procurement, suspension, and debarment compliance requirements, we identified that the District?s written procedures for procurement of goods or services did not fully conform with the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR section 200.318 through 200.327. Questioned Costs None reported Context Although the District?s purchasing policy incorporated portions of 2 CFR, sections 200.318 through 200.327, the written procedures do not conform to the requirements of 2 CFR, section 200.318(a) which requires that the non-federal entity must have and use documented procedures consistent with the standards identified in sections 200.318 through 200.327. The District?s written procedures do not identify the applicable requirements of sections 200.318 through 200.327 that apply to the procurement action based on the method of procurement. Effect The District?s written policies and procedures did not comply with the requirements of 200.318(a). Cause The District?s written policy and procedures for purchasing were not updated to incorporate the applicable requirements of sections 200.318 through 200.327 that apply to the procurement action based on the method of procurement. Repeat Finding No Recommendation We recommend that the District continue to strengthen its written procurement procedures to incorporate the applicable requirements identified in sections 200.318 through 200.327 of the Uniform Guidance that apply based on the procurement action and the method of procurement as required by section 200.318(a). Views of Responsible Officials Management agrees with the finding.
Program: Child Nutrition Cluster CFDA Number: 10.555, 10.553 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Pass-through: California Department of Education Award Year: 2021-2022 Compliance Requirement(s): Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment Type of Finding: Material Weakness, Instance of Noncompliance Criteria Per the 2 CFR 200.318(a), non-Federal entities other than States, including those operating Federal programs as subrecipients of States, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.327. The non-Federal entity must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200 (Uniform Guidance). Condition As a result of the test work performed over the procurement, suspension, and debarment compliance requirements, we identified that the District?s written procedures for procurement of goods or services did not fully conform with the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR section 200.318 through 200.327. Questioned Costs None reported Context Although the District?s purchasing policy incorporated portions of 2 CFR, sections 200.318 through 200.327, the written procedures do not conform to the requirements of 2 CFR, section 200.318(a) which requires that the non-federal entity must have and use documented procedures consistent with the standards identified in sections 200.318 through 200.327. The District?s written procedures do not identify the applicable requirements of sections 200.318 through 200.327 that apply to the procurement action based on the method of procurement. Effect The District?s written policies and procedures did not comply with the requirements of 200.318(a). Cause The District?s written policy and procedures for purchasing were not updated to incorporate the applicable requirements of sections 200.318 through 200.327 that apply to the procurement action based on the method of procurement. Repeat Finding No Recommendation We recommend that the District continue to strengthen its written procurement procedures to incorporate the applicable requirements identified in sections 200.318 through 200.327 of the Uniform Guidance that apply based on the procurement action and the method of procurement as required by section 200.318(a). Views of Responsible Officials Management agrees with the finding.
Program: Child Nutrition Cluster CFDA Number: 10.555, 10.553 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Pass-through: California Department of Education Award Year: 2021-2022 Compliance Requirement(s): Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment Type of Finding: Material Weakness, Instance of Noncompliance Criteria Per the 2 CFR 200.318(a), non-Federal entities other than States, including those operating Federal programs as subrecipients of States, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.327. The non-Federal entity must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200 (Uniform Guidance). Condition As a result of the test work performed over the procurement, suspension, and debarment compliance requirements, we identified that the District?s written procedures for procurement of goods or services did not fully conform with the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR section 200.318 through 200.327. Questioned Costs None reported Context Although the District?s purchasing policy incorporated portions of 2 CFR, sections 200.318 through 200.327, the written procedures do not conform to the requirements of 2 CFR, section 200.318(a) which requires that the non-federal entity must have and use documented procedures consistent with the standards identified in sections 200.318 through 200.327. The District?s written procedures do not identify the applicable requirements of sections 200.318 through 200.327 that apply to the procurement action based on the method of procurement. Effect The District?s written policies and procedures did not comply with the requirements of 200.318(a). Cause The District?s written policy and procedures for purchasing were not updated to incorporate the applicable requirements of sections 200.318 through 200.327 that apply to the procurement action based on the method of procurement. Repeat Finding No Recommendation We recommend that the District continue to strengthen its written procurement procedures to incorporate the applicable requirements identified in sections 200.318 through 200.327 of the Uniform Guidance that apply based on the procurement action and the method of procurement as required by section 200.318(a). Views of Responsible Officials Management agrees with the finding.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Federal Program Name: Continuum of Care Program Assistance Listing Number: 14.267 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: WA0000U0T042006 05/25/2021 Pass-Through Agency: Snohomish County Human Services Pass-Through Number(s): HCS-21-50-2030-077, HCS-21-50-2032-077 Award Period: July 1, 2021 ? June 30, 2022 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria or specific requirement: For grants and cooperative agreements, the procurement method used must be appropriate based on the dollar amount and conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320 or the entities policies, whichever is more restrictive. Condition: Procurement procedures were not followed in accordance with the Agency?s policy. Questioned costs: None Context: 5 out of 40 procurement transactions tested were not in compliance. Cause: The Agency did not follow its procurement policy. Effect: The Agency is out of compliance with its procurement policy. Repeat Finding: N/A Recommendation: We recommend the Agency's procurement policy is updated to reflect the current federal guidelines and that policies and procedures are implemented to ensure that the history of the procurement, including the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, basis for contractor selection, and the basis for the contract price is documented as applicable (2 CFR section 200.318(i) and 48 CFR Part 44 and section 52.244-2). Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Federal Program Name: Continuum of Care Program Assistance Listing Number: 14.267 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: WA0000U0T042006 05/25/2021 Pass-Through Agency: Snohomish County Human Services Pass-Through Number(s): HCS-21-50-2039-077, HCS-21-50-2030-077, HCS-21-50-2032-077 Award Period: July 1, 2021 ? June 30, 2022 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria or specific requirement: Procedures for verifying that an entity with which an organization plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded must be documented. (2 CFR sections 200.212 and 200.318(h); 2 CFR section 180.300; 48 CFR section 52.209-6). Condition: Procedures for verifying that an entity with which the Agency entered into covered transaction was not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded was not maintained for three out of three transactions tested. Questioned costs: None Context: 3 out of 3 covered transactions tested were not in compliance. Cause: Procedures were followed but not documented. Effect: Appropriate documentation was not maintained as required. Repeat Finding: N/A Recommendation: We recommend that policies and procedures are implemented that appropriate documentation is maintained when entering into transaction with covered entities as defined by 2 CFR section 180.220. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Federal Program Name: Continuum of Care Program Assistance Listing Number: 14.267 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: WA0000U0T042006 05/25/2021 Pass-Through Agency: Snohomish County Human Services Pass-Through Number(s): HCS-21-50-2030-077, HCS-21-50-2032-077 Award Period: July 1, 2021 ? June 30, 2022 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria or specific requirement: For grants and cooperative agreements, the procurement method used must be appropriate based on the dollar amount and conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320 or the entities policies, whichever is more restrictive. Condition: Procurement procedures were not followed in accordance with the Agency?s policy. Questioned costs: None Context: 5 out of 40 procurement transactions tested were not in compliance. Cause: The Agency did not follow its procurement policy. Effect: The Agency is out of compliance with its procurement policy. Repeat Finding: N/A Recommendation: We recommend the Agency's procurement policy is updated to reflect the current federal guidelines and that policies and procedures are implemented to ensure that the history of the procurement, including the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, basis for contractor selection, and the basis for the contract price is documented as applicable (2 CFR section 200.318(i) and 48 CFR Part 44 and section 52.244-2). Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Federal Program Name: Continuum of Care Program Assistance Listing Number: 14.267 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: WA0000U0T042006 05/25/2021 Pass-Through Agency: Snohomish County Human Services Pass-Through Number(s): HCS-21-50-2039-077, HCS-21-50-2030-077, HCS-21-50-2032-077 Award Period: July 1, 2021 ? June 30, 2022 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria or specific requirement: Procedures for verifying that an entity with which an organization plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded must be documented. (2 CFR sections 200.212 and 200.318(h); 2 CFR section 180.300; 48 CFR section 52.209-6). Condition: Procedures for verifying that an entity with which the Agency entered into covered transaction was not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded was not maintained for three out of three transactions tested. Questioned costs: None Context: 3 out of 3 covered transactions tested were not in compliance. Cause: Procedures were followed but not documented. Effect: Appropriate documentation was not maintained as required. Repeat Finding: N/A Recommendation: We recommend that policies and procedures are implemented that appropriate documentation is maintained when entering into transaction with covered entities as defined by 2 CFR section 180.220. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Federal Program Name: Continuum of Care Program Assistance Listing Number: 14.267 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: WA0000U0T042006 05/25/2021 Pass-Through Agency: Snohomish County Human Services Pass-Through Number(s): HCS-21-50-2030-077, HCS-21-50-2032-077 Award Period: July 1, 2021 ? June 30, 2022 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria or specific requirement: For grants and cooperative agreements, the procurement method used must be appropriate based on the dollar amount and conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320 or the entities policies, whichever is more restrictive. Condition: Procurement procedures were not followed in accordance with the Agency?s policy. Questioned costs: None Context: 5 out of 40 procurement transactions tested were not in compliance. Cause: The Agency did not follow its procurement policy. Effect: The Agency is out of compliance with its procurement policy. Repeat Finding: N/A Recommendation: We recommend the Agency's procurement policy is updated to reflect the current federal guidelines and that policies and procedures are implemented to ensure that the history of the procurement, including the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, basis for contractor selection, and the basis for the contract price is documented as applicable (2 CFR section 200.318(i) and 48 CFR Part 44 and section 52.244-2). Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Federal Program Name: Continuum of Care Program Assistance Listing Number: 14.267 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: WA0000U0T042006 05/25/2021 Pass-Through Agency: Snohomish County Human Services Pass-Through Number(s): HCS-21-50-2039-077, HCS-21-50-2030-077, HCS-21-50-2032-077 Award Period: July 1, 2021 ? June 30, 2022 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria or specific requirement: Procedures for verifying that an entity with which an organization plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded must be documented. (2 CFR sections 200.212 and 200.318(h); 2 CFR section 180.300; 48 CFR section 52.209-6). Condition: Procedures for verifying that an entity with which the Agency entered into covered transaction was not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded was not maintained for three out of three transactions tested. Questioned costs: None Context: 3 out of 3 covered transactions tested were not in compliance. Cause: Procedures were followed but not documented. Effect: Appropriate documentation was not maintained as required. Repeat Finding: N/A Recommendation: We recommend that policies and procedures are implemented that appropriate documentation is maintained when entering into transaction with covered entities as defined by 2 CFR section 180.220. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.318 (a section of the procurement standards applicable to federal grant programs) require that time and materials contracts include a not?to-exceed amount to be stated within the contract. Furthermore, appendix II to the standards require certain compliance matters to be included in contracts. Condition: The School Board purchased conflict resolution services in the amount of approximately $25,000, however, the contract for these services was for time and materials at a preset rate (which is allowed), but a maximum not-to-exceed was not included in the contract. Also, the compliance matters required by appendix II were not included in the contract. Universe/population: A sampling of six procurements totaling $110,042 were selected for testing from a population of 10 totaling $200,388. Effect: If not-to-exceed amounts are not stated in the contract, the School Board and the Program risk paying more than necessary for goods and services. If the provisions of appendix II are not included then the School Board risks lacking various protections under federal law. Cause: This appears to the result of oversight. Recommendation: All contracts involving federal programs should include the provisions of 2 CFR 200.318 and appendix II of the Uniform Guidance. Views of Responsible Officials: While we did not have the wording "not to exceed a specific amount" on the contract in question, we did have a set amount of time to not exceed. This amount of time and the cost per hour was figured into the budget. The budget was reviewed prior to making expenditures and monitored on at least a monthly basis to not exceed the amount budgeted. However, we now realize the need to include such wording. Moving forward, we will amend the current contracts to add a "not to exceed a specific amount" and continue to monitor the budget to not exceed the budget for the 2022-2023 fiscal year. We will also add the wording "not to exceed a specific amount" on all contracts for the 2023-2024 school year.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.318 (a section of the procurement standards applicable to federal grant programs) require that time and materials contracts include a not?to-exceed amount to be stated within the contract. Furthermore, appendix II to the standards require certain compliance matters to be included in contracts. Condition: The School Board purchased conflict resolution services in the amount of approximately $25,000, however, the contract for these services was for time and materials at a preset rate (which is allowed), but a maximum not-to-exceed was not included in the contract. Also, the compliance matters required by appendix II were not included in the contract. Universe/population: A sampling of six procurements totaling $110,042 were selected for testing from a population of 10 totaling $200,388. Effect: If not-to-exceed amounts are not stated in the contract, the School Board and the Program risk paying more than necessary for goods and services. If the provisions of appendix II are not included then the School Board risks lacking various protections under federal law. Cause: This appears to the result of oversight. Recommendation: All contracts involving federal programs should include the provisions of 2 CFR 200.318 and appendix II of the Uniform Guidance. Views of Responsible Officials: While we did not have the wording "not to exceed a specific amount" on the contract in question, we did have a set amount of time to not exceed. This amount of time and the cost per hour was figured into the budget. The budget was reviewed prior to making expenditures and monitored on at least a monthly basis to not exceed the amount budgeted. However, we now realize the need to include such wording. Moving forward, we will amend the current contracts to add a "not to exceed a specific amount" and continue to monitor the budget to not exceed the budget for the 2022-2023 fiscal year. We will also add the wording "not to exceed a specific amount" on all contracts for the 2023-2024 school year.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.318 (a section of the procurement standards applicable to federal grant programs) require that time and materials contracts include a not?to-exceed amount to be stated within the contract. Furthermore, appendix II to the standards require certain compliance matters to be included in contracts. Condition: The School Board purchased conflict resolution services in the amount of approximately $25,000, however, the contract for these services was for time and materials at a preset rate (which is allowed), but a maximum not-to-exceed was not included in the contract. Also, the compliance matters required by appendix II were not included in the contract. Universe/population: A sampling of six procurements totaling $110,042 were selected for testing from a population of 10 totaling $200,388. Effect: If not-to-exceed amounts are not stated in the contract, the School Board and the Program risk paying more than necessary for goods and services. If the provisions of appendix II are not included then the School Board risks lacking various protections under federal law. Cause: This appears to the result of oversight. Recommendation: All contracts involving federal programs should include the provisions of 2 CFR 200.318 and appendix II of the Uniform Guidance. Views of Responsible Officials: While we did not have the wording "not to exceed a specific amount" on the contract in question, we did have a set amount of time to not exceed. This amount of time and the cost per hour was figured into the budget. The budget was reviewed prior to making expenditures and monitored on at least a monthly basis to not exceed the amount budgeted. However, we now realize the need to include such wording. Moving forward, we will amend the current contracts to add a "not to exceed a specific amount" and continue to monitor the budget to not exceed the budget for the 2022-2023 fiscal year. We will also add the wording "not to exceed a specific amount" on all contracts for the 2023-2024 school year.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.318 (a section of the procurement standards applicable to federal grant programs) require that time and materials contracts include a not?to-exceed amount to be stated within the contract. Furthermore, appendix II to the standards require certain compliance matters to be included in contracts. Condition: The School Board purchased conflict resolution services in the amount of approximately $25,000, however, the contract for these services was for time and materials at a preset rate (which is allowed), but a maximum not-to-exceed was not included in the contract. Also, the compliance matters required by appendix II were not included in the contract. Universe/population: A sampling of six procurements totaling $110,042 were selected for testing from a population of 10 totaling $200,388. Effect: If not-to-exceed amounts are not stated in the contract, the School Board and the Program risk paying more than necessary for goods and services. If the provisions of appendix II are not included then the School Board risks lacking various protections under federal law. Cause: This appears to the result of oversight. Recommendation: All contracts involving federal programs should include the provisions of 2 CFR 200.318 and appendix II of the Uniform Guidance. Views of Responsible Officials: While we did not have the wording "not to exceed a specific amount" on the contract in question, we did have a set amount of time to not exceed. This amount of time and the cost per hour was figured into the budget. The budget was reviewed prior to making expenditures and monitored on at least a monthly basis to not exceed the amount budgeted. However, we now realize the need to include such wording. Moving forward, we will amend the current contracts to add a "not to exceed a specific amount" and continue to monitor the budget to not exceed the budget for the 2022-2023 fiscal year. We will also add the wording "not to exceed a specific amount" on all contracts for the 2023-2024 school year.
FINDING 2022-007 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, COVID-19 - School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, COVID-19 - National School Lunch Program Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): SY 2020-2021, SY 2021-2022 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $150,000. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. The School Corporation did not obtain price or rate quotes for two of the four vendors tested that were less than the simplified acquisition threshold of $150,000, but exceeded the $10,000 micro-purchase threshold. The micro-purchase threshold may be increased, but the School Corporation did not provide documentation that the threshold had been increased. Documentation detailing the history of procurement, which must include the reason for the procurement method used, was not available for audit. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318 states in part: "(a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in ?? 200.317 through 200.327. . . . (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. . . ." 2 CFR 200.320(b) (Uniform Guidance) states: "Procurement by small purchase procedures. Small purchase procedures are those relatively simple and informal procurement methods for securing services, supplies, or other property that do not cost more than the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources." 2 CFR 200.320 (Revised Uniform Guidance) states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use document procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and ?? 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319, for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in ? 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases ? (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non- Federal entity. . . ." Cause Management had not established a system of internal control that would have ensured compliance with the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Effect The failure to design and implement an effective internal control system enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure compliance and comply with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-007 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, COVID-19 - School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, COVID-19 - National School Lunch Program Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): SY 2020-2021, SY 2021-2022 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $150,000. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. The School Corporation did not obtain price or rate quotes for two of the four vendors tested that were less than the simplified acquisition threshold of $150,000, but exceeded the $10,000 micro-purchase threshold. The micro-purchase threshold may be increased, but the School Corporation did not provide documentation that the threshold had been increased. Documentation detailing the history of procurement, which must include the reason for the procurement method used, was not available for audit. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318 states in part: "(a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in ?? 200.317 through 200.327. . . . (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. . . ." 2 CFR 200.320(b) (Uniform Guidance) states: "Procurement by small purchase procedures. Small purchase procedures are those relatively simple and informal procurement methods for securing services, supplies, or other property that do not cost more than the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources." 2 CFR 200.320 (Revised Uniform Guidance) states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use document procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and ?? 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319, for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in ? 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases ? (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non- Federal entity. . . ." Cause Management had not established a system of internal control that would have ensured compliance with the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Effect The failure to design and implement an effective internal control system enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure compliance and comply with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-007 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, COVID-19 - School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, COVID-19 - National School Lunch Program Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): SY 2020-2021, SY 2021-2022 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $150,000. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. The School Corporation did not obtain price or rate quotes for two of the four vendors tested that were less than the simplified acquisition threshold of $150,000, but exceeded the $10,000 micro-purchase threshold. The micro-purchase threshold may be increased, but the School Corporation did not provide documentation that the threshold had been increased. Documentation detailing the history of procurement, which must include the reason for the procurement method used, was not available for audit. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318 states in part: "(a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in ?? 200.317 through 200.327. . . . (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. . . ." 2 CFR 200.320(b) (Uniform Guidance) states: "Procurement by small purchase procedures. Small purchase procedures are those relatively simple and informal procurement methods for securing services, supplies, or other property that do not cost more than the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources." 2 CFR 200.320 (Revised Uniform Guidance) states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use document procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and ?? 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319, for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in ? 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases ? (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non- Federal entity. . . ." Cause Management had not established a system of internal control that would have ensured compliance with the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Effect The failure to design and implement an effective internal control system enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure compliance and comply with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-007 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, COVID-19 - School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, COVID-19 - National School Lunch Program Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): SY 2020-2021, SY 2021-2022 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $150,000. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. The School Corporation did not obtain price or rate quotes for two of the four vendors tested that were less than the simplified acquisition threshold of $150,000, but exceeded the $10,000 micro-purchase threshold. The micro-purchase threshold may be increased, but the School Corporation did not provide documentation that the threshold had been increased. Documentation detailing the history of procurement, which must include the reason for the procurement method used, was not available for audit. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318 states in part: "(a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in ?? 200.317 through 200.327. . . . (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. . . ." 2 CFR 200.320(b) (Uniform Guidance) states: "Procurement by small purchase procedures. Small purchase procedures are those relatively simple and informal procurement methods for securing services, supplies, or other property that do not cost more than the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources." 2 CFR 200.320 (Revised Uniform Guidance) states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use document procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and ?? 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319, for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in ? 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases ? (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non- Federal entity. . . ." Cause Management had not established a system of internal control that would have ensured compliance with the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Effect The failure to design and implement an effective internal control system enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure compliance and comply with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-007 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, COVID-19 - School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, COVID-19 - National School Lunch Program Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): SY 2020-2021, SY 2021-2022 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $150,000. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. The School Corporation did not obtain price or rate quotes for two of the four vendors tested that were less than the simplified acquisition threshold of $150,000, but exceeded the $10,000 micro-purchase threshold. The micro-purchase threshold may be increased, but the School Corporation did not provide documentation that the threshold had been increased. Documentation detailing the history of procurement, which must include the reason for the procurement method used, was not available for audit. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318 states in part: "(a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in ?? 200.317 through 200.327. . . . (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. . . ." 2 CFR 200.320(b) (Uniform Guidance) states: "Procurement by small purchase procedures. Small purchase procedures are those relatively simple and informal procurement methods for securing services, supplies, or other property that do not cost more than the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources." 2 CFR 200.320 (Revised Uniform Guidance) states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use document procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and ?? 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319, for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in ? 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases ? (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non- Federal entity. . . ." Cause Management had not established a system of internal control that would have ensured compliance with the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Effect The failure to design and implement an effective internal control system enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure compliance and comply with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-007 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, COVID-19 - School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, COVID-19 - National School Lunch Program Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): SY 2020-2021, SY 2021-2022 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $150,000. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. The School Corporation did not obtain price or rate quotes for two of the four vendors tested that were less than the simplified acquisition threshold of $150,000, but exceeded the $10,000 micro-purchase threshold. The micro-purchase threshold may be increased, but the School Corporation did not provide documentation that the threshold had been increased. Documentation detailing the history of procurement, which must include the reason for the procurement method used, was not available for audit. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318 states in part: "(a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in ?? 200.317 through 200.327. . . . (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. . . ." 2 CFR 200.320(b) (Uniform Guidance) states: "Procurement by small purchase procedures. Small purchase procedures are those relatively simple and informal procurement methods for securing services, supplies, or other property that do not cost more than the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources." 2 CFR 200.320 (Revised Uniform Guidance) states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use document procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and ?? 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319, for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in ? 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases ? (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non- Federal entity. . . ." Cause Management had not established a system of internal control that would have ensured compliance with the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Effect The failure to design and implement an effective internal control system enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure compliance and comply with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
Finding 2022-001 Prior Year Finding Number: N/A Type of Finding: Internal Control over Compliance Severity of Deficiency: Significant Deficiency Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education CFDA#: 84.027, 84.173 ? Special Education Cluster Pass-through Entity: Colorado Department of Education Type of Compliance Requirement ? Criteria: Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment ? 2CFR ??200.318 through 200.327 Criteria or specific requirement: Internal control over procurement, suspension, and debarment for federal award programs as indicated within the Uniform Guidance as indicated from the following excerpt(s): ?200.318 ? General procurement standards (a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non- Federal entity?s documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in ??200.317 through 200.327. Condition: During our review of Mountain Board of Cooperative Education?s procurement policy, we noted it did not include all the required language to ensure full compliance with 2CFR ?? 200.318 through 200.327, particularly the requirements discussing the allowable procurement methods, dollar thresholds, and the requirements for each allowable method. Cause: Management was unaware that the procurement policy had to meet these compliance requirements. Effect: Mountain Board of Cooperative Education may procure property and services that are not in compliance with Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs: There were no reportable questioned costs related to this finding. Recommendation: We recommend Mountain Board of Cooperative Education update their procurement policy to encompass all requirements set by 2 CFR ??200.318 through 200.327. View of responsible officials and planned corrective action: We agree with the above finding and have implemented an appropriate corrective action plan.
Finding No. 2022-004 Procurement Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: U.S. Department of the Treasury Federal Program Name: COVID-19 American Rescue Plan Act Local Fiscal Recovery Federal Award Identification Number: SLFRP0128 Grant Year: 2021 Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Pass-Through Agency: State of Connecticut Office of Policy and Management Pass-Through Number(s): 12060-OPM20600-29669 Award Period: June 7, 2021, through December 31, 2026 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Other Matters Criteria or Specific Requirement: The City must comply with procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 within Uniform Guidance including the verification that an entity with which the City plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded. Condition: The Cities procurement standards do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Policies regarding verification of compliance with suspension and debarment requirements were not found. Questioned Costs: None Context: Although the City did not have a policy in place in conformity with the federal Uniform Guidance criteria the population of expenditures requiring testing were immaterial or otherwise excluded from testing requirements. Effect: With the absence of a compliant policy, the City could process transactions that do not follow federal Uniform Guidance procurement standards. Cause: The City was in the process of updating their policy to be in line with the Uniform Guidance procurement standards, but was unable to finalize the policy prior to incurring allowable costs. Recommendation: We recommend the City comply with procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 within Uniform Guidance including the verification that an entity with which the City plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the auditors? recommendations
2022-006 Child Nutrition Cluster ? Procurement Information on Federal Program: U.S Department of Agriculture Child Nutrition Cluster (COVID-19 National School Lunch Program, School Breakfast Program and Food Distribution Federal Assistance Listing No. 10.555 and 10.553) passed through the New York State Education Department. Criteria: CFR Section 200.318 stipulates that a non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable state, local, and tribal laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal law and the standards identified in Part 200 Subpart D. Additionally, 2 CFR Section 200.213 stipulates that no awards, subawards, or contracts be awarded to parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. Statement of Condition: During our discussions with management and reverification of use of same vendors as previous year, we noted that the District is not verifying the eligibility of vendors to participate in Federal assistance programs. Statement of Cause: The District did not review compliance requirements related to procurement outlined in 2 CFR Section 200.318 and Section 200.213. Statement of Effect: The District is not in compliance with 2 CFR Section 200.213. The District is not performing required procedures, as a result, vendors that are not eligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities could be selected or the District could be overpaying for goods and services. Questioned Costs: None Perspective Information: As part of required follow up of prior year audit findings, a review of vendors charged to the school lunch fund and therefore represent purchases with federal dollars was performed. Of the District?s vendors charged to the fund, none were suspended or debarred from participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. Repeat Finding: Yes Recommendation: We recommend that the District review the requirements of 2 CFR Section 200.213 and ensure that a review of the eligibility of potential vendors to participate in Federal assistance programs or activities is performed prior to disbursing funds to the vendor. Views of the Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The Interim Business Administrator will work closely with the new Food Service Director to verify and record any company/vendor that is paid with Federal money.
2022-006 Child Nutrition Cluster ? Procurement Information on Federal Program: U.S Department of Agriculture Child Nutrition Cluster (COVID-19 National School Lunch Program, School Breakfast Program and Food Distribution Federal Assistance Listing No. 10.555 and 10.553) passed through the New York State Education Department. Criteria: CFR Section 200.318 stipulates that a non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable state, local, and tribal laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal law and the standards identified in Part 200 Subpart D. Additionally, 2 CFR Section 200.213 stipulates that no awards, subawards, or contracts be awarded to parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. Statement of Condition: During our discussions with management and reverification of use of same vendors as previous year, we noted that the District is not verifying the eligibility of vendors to participate in Federal assistance programs. Statement of Cause: The District did not review compliance requirements related to procurement outlined in 2 CFR Section 200.318 and Section 200.213. Statement of Effect: The District is not in compliance with 2 CFR Section 200.213. The District is not performing required procedures, as a result, vendors that are not eligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities could be selected or the District could be overpaying for goods and services. Questioned Costs: None Perspective Information: As part of required follow up of prior year audit findings, a review of vendors charged to the school lunch fund and therefore represent purchases with federal dollars was performed. Of the District?s vendors charged to the fund, none were suspended or debarred from participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. Repeat Finding: Yes Recommendation: We recommend that the District review the requirements of 2 CFR Section 200.213 and ensure that a review of the eligibility of potential vendors to participate in Federal assistance programs or activities is performed prior to disbursing funds to the vendor. Views of the Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The Interim Business Administrator will work closely with the new Food Service Director to verify and record any company/vendor that is paid with Federal money.
2022-006 Child Nutrition Cluster ? Procurement Information on Federal Program: U.S Department of Agriculture Child Nutrition Cluster (COVID-19 National School Lunch Program, School Breakfast Program and Food Distribution Federal Assistance Listing No. 10.555 and 10.553) passed through the New York State Education Department. Criteria: CFR Section 200.318 stipulates that a non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable state, local, and tribal laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal law and the standards identified in Part 200 Subpart D. Additionally, 2 CFR Section 200.213 stipulates that no awards, subawards, or contracts be awarded to parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. Statement of Condition: During our discussions with management and reverification of use of same vendors as previous year, we noted that the District is not verifying the eligibility of vendors to participate in Federal assistance programs. Statement of Cause: The District did not review compliance requirements related to procurement outlined in 2 CFR Section 200.318 and Section 200.213. Statement of Effect: The District is not in compliance with 2 CFR Section 200.213. The District is not performing required procedures, as a result, vendors that are not eligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities could be selected or the District could be overpaying for goods and services. Questioned Costs: None Perspective Information: As part of required follow up of prior year audit findings, a review of vendors charged to the school lunch fund and therefore represent purchases with federal dollars was performed. Of the District?s vendors charged to the fund, none were suspended or debarred from participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. Repeat Finding: Yes Recommendation: We recommend that the District review the requirements of 2 CFR Section 200.213 and ensure that a review of the eligibility of potential vendors to participate in Federal assistance programs or activities is performed prior to disbursing funds to the vendor. Views of the Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The Interim Business Administrator will work closely with the new Food Service Director to verify and record any company/vendor that is paid with Federal money.
2022-006 Child Nutrition Cluster ? Procurement Information on Federal Program: U.S Department of Agriculture Child Nutrition Cluster (COVID-19 National School Lunch Program, School Breakfast Program and Food Distribution Federal Assistance Listing No. 10.555 and 10.553) passed through the New York State Education Department. Criteria: CFR Section 200.318 stipulates that a non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable state, local, and tribal laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal law and the standards identified in Part 200 Subpart D. Additionally, 2 CFR Section 200.213 stipulates that no awards, subawards, or contracts be awarded to parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. Statement of Condition: During our discussions with management and reverification of use of same vendors as previous year, we noted that the District is not verifying the eligibility of vendors to participate in Federal assistance programs. Statement of Cause: The District did not review compliance requirements related to procurement outlined in 2 CFR Section 200.318 and Section 200.213. Statement of Effect: The District is not in compliance with 2 CFR Section 200.213. The District is not performing required procedures, as a result, vendors that are not eligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities could be selected or the District could be overpaying for goods and services. Questioned Costs: None Perspective Information: As part of required follow up of prior year audit findings, a review of vendors charged to the school lunch fund and therefore represent purchases with federal dollars was performed. Of the District?s vendors charged to the fund, none were suspended or debarred from participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. Repeat Finding: Yes Recommendation: We recommend that the District review the requirements of 2 CFR Section 200.213 and ensure that a review of the eligibility of potential vendors to participate in Federal assistance programs or activities is performed prior to disbursing funds to the vendor. Views of the Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The Interim Business Administrator will work closely with the new Food Service Director to verify and record any company/vendor that is paid with Federal money.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Federal Program Name: State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: SLFRP2619, 2022 Pass-Through Agency: Minnesota Department of Education Pass-Through Numbers: Unknown Award Period: July 1, 2021 ? June 30, 2022 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance and Material Noncompliance Criteria or Specific Requirement: Non-federal entities other than states must follow the procurement standards set out at c CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. This includes utilizing one of the five allowable procurement methods, including small purchase guidelines for items over the micro-purchase threshold and sealed bids, competitive proposals, or noncompetitive proposals when items exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. In addition, the Uniform Guidance requires that the entity maintain records sufficient to detail the history of the procurement. Condition: During our testing of the District?s procurements within the State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds program, it was noted that not all procurements followed the appropriate method and history of the transaction was not sufficiently documented. Context: Out of eight procurements which were tested, we noted that three of them did not have proper documentation for the justification of noncompetitive proposals and one of them the District did not have documentation detailing the history of the procurement, including any other quotes obtained due to the District not following the micro-purchase threshold listed in their policy. Questioned Costs: $58,198.49 Cause: The district was unaware that they needed documentation for noncompetitive procurements as well as that their policy had a different micro-purchase threshold compared to what was in the UG. Effect: The District was not in compliance with the documentation requirements for procurement transactions as detailed in the Uniform Guidance. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend the District reviews its procedures and controls over procurement to ensure that all procurements are documented such that a third party can clearly see and understand the detailed history of the procurement. Views of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Federal Program Name: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) Assistance Listing Number: 84.027 and 84.173 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: H027A220087, 2022 Pass-Through Agency: Minnesota Department of Education Pass-Through Numbers: H027A210087, H027X210087, H173A210086, H173X210086 Award Period: July 1, 2021 ? September 30, 2022 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance and Material Noncompliance (Modified Opinion) Criteria or Specific Requirement: Non-federal entities other than states must follow the procurement standards set out at c CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. This includes utilizing one of the five allowable procurement methods, including small purchase guidelines for items over the micro-purchase threshold and sealed bids, competitive proposals, or noncompetitive proposals when items exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. In addition, the Uniform Guidance requires that the entity maintain records sufficient to detail the history of the procurement. Condition: During our testing of the District?s procurements within the Special Education program, it was noted that not all procurements followed the appropriate method and history of the transaction was not sufficiently documented. Context: Out of six procurements which were tested, we noted that five of them, for which the District obtained quotes using the small purchase method, did not contain documentation detailing the history of the procurement, including any other quotes obtained. Questioned Costs: ALN 84.027 - $415,251.22. Cause: The district was unaware that they needed documentation for noncompetitive procurements as well as that their policy had a different micro-purchase threshold compared to what was in the UG. Effect: The District was not in compliance with the documentation requirements for procurement transactions as detailed in the Uniform Guidance. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend the District reviews its procedures and controls over procurement to ensure that all procurements are documented such that a third party can clearly see and understand the detailed history of the procurement. Views of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Federal Program Name: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) Assistance Listing Number: 84.027 and 84.173 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: H027A220087, 2022 Pass-Through Agency: Minnesota Department of Education Pass-Through Numbers: H027A210087, H027X210087, H173A210086, H173X210086 Award Period: July 1, 2021 ? September 30, 2022 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance and Material Noncompliance (Modified Opinion) Criteria or Specific Requirement: Non-federal entities other than states must follow the procurement standards set out at c CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. This includes utilizing one of the five allowable procurement methods, including small purchase guidelines for items over the micro-purchase threshold and sealed bids, competitive proposals, or noncompetitive proposals when items exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. In addition, the Uniform Guidance requires that the entity maintain records sufficient to detail the history of the procurement. Condition: During our testing of the District?s procurements within the Special Education program, it was noted that not all procurements followed the appropriate method and history of the transaction was not sufficiently documented. Context: Out of six procurements which were tested, we noted that five of them, for which the District obtained quotes using the small purchase method, did not contain documentation detailing the history of the procurement, including any other quotes obtained. Questioned Costs: ALN 84.027 - $415,251.22. Cause: The district was unaware that they needed documentation for noncompetitive procurements as well as that their policy had a different micro-purchase threshold compared to what was in the UG. Effect: The District was not in compliance with the documentation requirements for procurement transactions as detailed in the Uniform Guidance. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend the District reviews its procedures and controls over procurement to ensure that all procurements are documented such that a third party can clearly see and understand the detailed history of the procurement. Views of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Federal Program Name: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) Assistance Listing Number: 84.027 and 84.173 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: H027A220087, 2022 Pass-Through Agency: Minnesota Department of Education Pass-Through Numbers: H027A210087, H027X210087, H173A210086, H173X210086 Award Period: July 1, 2021 ? September 30, 2022 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance and Material Noncompliance (Modified Opinion) Criteria or Specific Requirement: Non-federal entities other than states must follow the procurement standards set out at c CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. This includes utilizing one of the five allowable procurement methods, including small purchase guidelines for items over the micro-purchase threshold and sealed bids, competitive proposals, or noncompetitive proposals when items exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. In addition, the Uniform Guidance requires that the entity maintain records sufficient to detail the history of the procurement. Condition: During our testing of the District?s procurements within the Special Education program, it was noted that not all procurements followed the appropriate method and history of the transaction was not sufficiently documented. Context: Out of six procurements which were tested, we noted that five of them, for which the District obtained quotes using the small purchase method, did not contain documentation detailing the history of the procurement, including any other quotes obtained. Questioned Costs: ALN 84.027 - $415,251.22. Cause: The district was unaware that they needed documentation for noncompetitive procurements as well as that their policy had a different micro-purchase threshold compared to what was in the UG. Effect: The District was not in compliance with the documentation requirements for procurement transactions as detailed in the Uniform Guidance. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend the District reviews its procedures and controls over procurement to ensure that all procurements are documented such that a third party can clearly see and understand the detailed history of the procurement. Views of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Federal Program Name: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) Assistance Listing Number: 84.027 and 84.173 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: H027A220087, 2022 Pass-Through Agency: Minnesota Department of Education Pass-Through Numbers: H027A210087, H027X210087, H173A210086, H173X210086 Award Period: July 1, 2021 ? September 30, 2022 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance and Material Noncompliance (Modified Opinion) Criteria or Specific Requirement: Non-federal entities other than states must follow the procurement standards set out at c CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. This includes utilizing one of the five allowable procurement methods, including small purchase guidelines for items over the micro-purchase threshold and sealed bids, competitive proposals, or noncompetitive proposals when items exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. In addition, the Uniform Guidance requires that the entity maintain records sufficient to detail the history of the procurement. Condition: During our testing of the District?s procurements within the Special Education program, it was noted that not all procurements followed the appropriate method and history of the transaction was not sufficiently documented. Context: Out of six procurements which were tested, we noted that five of them, for which the District obtained quotes using the small purchase method, did not contain documentation detailing the history of the procurement, including any other quotes obtained. Questioned Costs: ALN 84.027 - $415,251.22. Cause: The district was unaware that they needed documentation for noncompetitive procurements as well as that their policy had a different micro-purchase threshold compared to what was in the UG. Effect: The District was not in compliance with the documentation requirements for procurement transactions as detailed in the Uniform Guidance. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend the District reviews its procedures and controls over procurement to ensure that all procurements are documented such that a third party can clearly see and understand the detailed history of the procurement. Views of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
B. FINDINGS - FINANCIAL STATEMENT AUDIT IC-2022-001: Financial Reporting (Material Weakness) Condition: Material misstatements within the financial statements were identified throughout the audit. Criteria: Management should have processes and procedures in place so as to be able to generate financial statements and reports that are complete and accurate on a timely basis and in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). Cause: The current size of the finance staffing of the County and School Board may not be sufficient to detect and prevent material errors. Effect: Financial statements and reports prepared in accordance with GAAP were not able to be generated accurately on a timely basis. Recommendation: We recommend that management re-evaluate the current staff structure and assignment of responsibilities in order to re-align roles and responsibilities with appropriate personnel or otherwise bolster their resource base so as to be able to meet the criteria. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: See Corrective Action Plan. C. FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS - MAJOR FEDERAL AWARD PROGRAM AUDIT FA-2022-001: Procurement (Material Weakness) Condition: The School Board?s written procurement policies do not include policies that cover CFR ?200.318e, ?200.318f, ?200.318i, ?200.319b, ?200.319c, ?200.319d, ?200.319e, ?200.320a1, ?200,322, ?200.324b, ?200.326 and ?200.327. Criteria: Non-federal entities must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR (Uniform Guidance) ?200.318 through ?200.327. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. Cause: The procurement policies for the School Board do not include the policies stated above, required by Uniform Guidance. Effect: The School Board?s policies do not comply with procurement requirements for federal awards (Uniform Guidance). Questioned Cost Amount: n/a Perspective Information: n/a Context: n/a Recommendation: Procurement policies should be reviewed and updated to be in compliance with the requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: See Corrective Action Plan.
Department of Transportation, Federal Assistance Listing - 20.507 Grant Identification Number - CA-2020-076 Formula Grants ? Urbanized Area Formula Program Compliance Requirement ? Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Significant Deficiency in internal control over compliance and compliance Criteria: Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326, including the micro-purchases and small purchase methods for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). Condition: As part of compiling the Commission?s population for procurements, from which a procurement sample would be selected, the Commission identified $26,432 of expenditures charged to the grant that were erroneously included in SEFA, as the procurement methods were not eligible for federal expenditures. As a result, prior to us testing compliance related to procurement, the Commission reclassed the $26,432 of expenditures from the federal grant, and removed from the SEFA, as of June 30, 2022. Cause: The Commission?s procedures did not allow for timely identification of the expenditures prior to including on the SEFA (and claiming for reimbursement). Effect: A journal entry was posted to correct the current year federal revenue balance as of June 30, 2022 in the amount of $26,432. Further, the Commission has applied these expenditures to future draw downs in order to reverse the expenditures that were claimed. Questioned Costs: $26,432 of expenditures for two vendors. Context/Sampling: The condition was identified during the Commission?s preparation of the procurement population related to the grant for the year ended June 30, 2022. Repeat Finding from Prior Year: No Recommendation: We recommend that the Commission review its closing policies and procedures as well as its federal grant management procedures to ensure procurement methods are considered prior to claiming expenditures or reporting on the SEFA. Views of Responsible Official and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees. See separately issued Corrective Action Plan.
COVID-19 Education Stabilization Fund, Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund ? Institutional Aid Portion, ALN 84.425F U.S. Department of Education, Award Year 2022 Criteria or Specific Requirement ? Procurement and Suspension and Debarment ? Section 18004(a)(1) Institutional Aid Portion ? 2 CFR 200.318-326 Condition ? The University does not have a procurement policy as required under federal guidelines. No support exists to show that vendors are reviewed for suspension or debarment. No support is maintained for sole source purchases. Questioned Costs ? None Context ? The University does not have a procurement policy in place to meet the Uniform Guidance procurement requirements. No errors were specifically found in testing of purchases against federal procurement requirements, but support could not be provided to show University procedures to check suspension or debarment. While none were selected for testing, it was additionally noted that no support was maintained for sole source purchases. Effect ? It is possible that purchases may be made that are not in accordance with federal procurement requirements that could lead to material noncompliance with federal grant agreements. Cause ? The University does not have a procurement policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance in place as is required under federal guidelines. Identification as a Repeat Finding ? N/A Recommendation ? The University should draft and approve a procurement policy that covers all aspects of federal procurement requirements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions ? Management agrees with the finding and implemented a procurement policy after year-end.
#2022-001 ? Uniform Guidance Procurement Standards Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 of the Uniform Guidance, Amistad, Inc. is required to have a documented purchasing policy, which at a minimum, incorporates the provisions of the Uniform Guidance. Condition: The OMB revised regulations applicable to federally funded programs are contained in Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). The Uniform Guidance replaced OMB Circulars A-133, A-87, and A-110 and incorporates new requirements for grant recipients. The Uniform Guidance includes not only protocols for program management and administration, but also updates compliance regulations for federal awards. Currently, the Organization has no formal written procurement policy that incorporates all provisions of the Uniform Guidance procurement standards. Questioned Costs: None Context: The Organization has not adopted a procurement policy that covers all aspects required by the Uniform Guidance. However, during our testing of procurement over federal expenditures, we did not note any violations of the Uniform Guidance procurement standards. Effect: Items required by the Uniform Guidance procurement standards are not currently addressed in an official, written procurement policy. Cause: Staff turnover and management oversight. Repeat Finding: Yes Recommendation: We recommend that management review the applicable provisions of the Uniform Guidance procurement standards and develop an appropriate written procurement policy. This would include incorporating definitions of the types of procurement (i.e. micro-purchases, small purchases, and small acquisition threshold) to match the language used in the Uniform Guidance procurement standards.
#2022-001 ? Uniform Guidance Procurement Standards Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 of the Uniform Guidance, Amistad, Inc. is required to have a documented purchasing policy, which at a minimum, incorporates the provisions of the Uniform Guidance. Condition: The OMB revised regulations applicable to federally funded programs are contained in Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). The Uniform Guidance replaced OMB Circulars A-133, A-87, and A-110 and incorporates new requirements for grant recipients. The Uniform Guidance includes not only protocols for program management and administration, but also updates compliance regulations for federal awards. Currently, the Organization has no formal written procurement policy that incorporates all provisions of the Uniform Guidance procurement standards. Questioned Costs: None Context: The Organization has not adopted a procurement policy that covers all aspects required by the Uniform Guidance. However, during our testing of procurement over federal expenditures, we did not note any violations of the Uniform Guidance procurement standards. Effect: Items required by the Uniform Guidance procurement standards are not currently addressed in an official, written procurement policy. Cause: Staff turnover and management oversight. Repeat Finding: Yes Recommendation: We recommend that management review the applicable provisions of the Uniform Guidance procurement standards and develop an appropriate written procurement policy. This would include incorporating definitions of the types of procurement (i.e. micro-purchases, small purchases, and small acquisition threshold) to match the language used in the Uniform Guidance procurement standards.
#2022-001 ? Uniform Guidance Procurement Standards Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 of the Uniform Guidance, Amistad, Inc. is required to have a documented purchasing policy, which at a minimum, incorporates the provisions of the Uniform Guidance. Condition: The OMB revised regulations applicable to federally funded programs are contained in Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). The Uniform Guidance replaced OMB Circulars A-133, A-87, and A-110 and incorporates new requirements for grant recipients. The Uniform Guidance includes not only protocols for program management and administration, but also updates compliance regulations for federal awards. Currently, the Organization has no formal written procurement policy that incorporates all provisions of the Uniform Guidance procurement standards. Questioned Costs: None Context: The Organization has not adopted a procurement policy that covers all aspects required by the Uniform Guidance. However, during our testing of procurement over federal expenditures, we did not note any violations of the Uniform Guidance procurement standards. Effect: Items required by the Uniform Guidance procurement standards are not currently addressed in an official, written procurement policy. Cause: Staff turnover and management oversight. Repeat Finding: Yes Recommendation: We recommend that management review the applicable provisions of the Uniform Guidance procurement standards and develop an appropriate written procurement policy. This would include incorporating definitions of the types of procurement (i.e. micro-purchases, small purchases, and small acquisition threshold) to match the language used in the Uniform Guidance procurement standards.
FINDING 2022-003 Information on the federal program: Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Program: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program Assistance Listing Number: 10.553 and 10.555 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY2021, FY2022 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Finding: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318 states: "(i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include but are not necessarily limited to the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price." 2 CFR 200.320 states: "(b) Procurement by small purchase procedures. Small purchase procedures are those relatively simple and informal procurement methods for securing services, supplies, or other property that do not cost more than the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirements. Cause: The School Corporation's management had not developed a system of internal controls to ensure compliance with the compliance requirements listed above. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: For the audit period, there were four vendors that fell within the small purchases procurement threshold. Small purchases are those vendors that the School Corporation has purchased between $10,000 - $150,000 of products and goods. During the testing of Procurement and Suspension and Debarment, we noted one instance in a sample of one, where the School Corporation did not obtain three price or rate quotations from other vendors or document the basis for purchasing form the vendor that was utilized. The School Corporation compared the prices from the selected vendor to one vendor from their purchasing cooperative but did not obtain any additional quotes to meet the three-quote requirement for the small purchases procurement threshold. The lack of controls and noncompliance occurred throughout the audit period. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: Yes. Was identified as finding 2020-001 in the prior audit. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish controls related to the grant agreement and the small purchase procurement method of the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
FINDING 2022-003 Information on the federal program: Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Program: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program Assistance Listing Number: 10.553 and 10.555 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY2021, FY2022 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Finding: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318 states: "(i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include but are not necessarily limited to the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price." 2 CFR 200.320 states: "(b) Procurement by small purchase procedures. Small purchase procedures are those relatively simple and informal procurement methods for securing services, supplies, or other property that do not cost more than the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirements. Cause: The School Corporation's management had not developed a system of internal controls to ensure compliance with the compliance requirements listed above. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: For the audit period, there were four vendors that fell within the small purchases procurement threshold. Small purchases are those vendors that the School Corporation has purchased between $10,000 - $150,000 of products and goods. During the testing of Procurement and Suspension and Debarment, we noted one instance in a sample of one, where the School Corporation did not obtain three price or rate quotations from other vendors or document the basis for purchasing form the vendor that was utilized. The School Corporation compared the prices from the selected vendor to one vendor from their purchasing cooperative but did not obtain any additional quotes to meet the three-quote requirement for the small purchases procurement threshold. The lack of controls and noncompliance occurred throughout the audit period. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: Yes. Was identified as finding 2020-001 in the prior audit. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish controls related to the grant agreement and the small purchase procurement method of the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
FINDING 2022-003 Information on the federal program: Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Program: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program Assistance Listing Number: 10.553 and 10.555 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY2021, FY2022 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Finding: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318 states: "(i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include but are not necessarily limited to the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price." 2 CFR 200.320 states: "(b) Procurement by small purchase procedures. Small purchase procedures are those relatively simple and informal procurement methods for securing services, supplies, or other property that do not cost more than the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirements. Cause: The School Corporation's management had not developed a system of internal controls to ensure compliance with the compliance requirements listed above. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: For the audit period, there were four vendors that fell within the small purchases procurement threshold. Small purchases are those vendors that the School Corporation has purchased between $10,000 - $150,000 of products and goods. During the testing of Procurement and Suspension and Debarment, we noted one instance in a sample of one, where the School Corporation did not obtain three price or rate quotations from other vendors or document the basis for purchasing form the vendor that was utilized. The School Corporation compared the prices from the selected vendor to one vendor from their purchasing cooperative but did not obtain any additional quotes to meet the three-quote requirement for the small purchases procurement threshold. The lack of controls and noncompliance occurred throughout the audit period. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: Yes. Was identified as finding 2020-001 in the prior audit. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish controls related to the grant agreement and the small purchase procurement method of the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
FINDING 2022-002 Information on the federal program: Subject: Special Education Cluster - Procurement Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listing Number: 84.027 and 84.173 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 20611-068-PN01, 21611-068-PN01, 20619-068-PN01, 21619-068-PN01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Finding: Material Weakness, Noncompliance, Qualified Opinion Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318 states: "(i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price." 2 CFR 200.320 states: "(b) Procurement by small purchase procedures. Small purchase procedures are those relatively simple and informal procurement methods for securing services, supplies, or other property that do not cost more than the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirements. Cause: The School Corporation's management had not developed a system of internal controls to ensure compliance with the compliance requirements listed above. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: For the audit period, there were two vendors that fell within the small purchases procurement threshold. Small purchases are those vendors that the School Corporation has purchased between $10,000 - $150,000 of products and goods. During the testing of Procurement and Suspension and Debarment, we noted one instance in a sample of one, where the School Corporation did not obtain price or rate quotations from other vendors or document the basis for purchasing from the vendor that was utilized. The amount disbursed to the vendor in fiscal year 2021 and 2022 was $32,638 and $39,945, respectively. In fiscal year 2022, the School Corporation stated they had obtained two quotes, but was not able to provide documentation supporting two quotes were obtained. The School Corporation was not able to provide verification that the vendor was not suspended or debarred. The lack of controls and noncompliance occurred throughout the audit period. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish controls related to the grant agreement and the small purchase procurement method of the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
FINDING 2022-002 Information on the federal program: Subject: Special Education Cluster - Procurement Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listing Number: 84.027 and 84.173 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 20611-068-PN01, 21611-068-PN01, 20619-068-PN01, 21619-068-PN01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Finding: Material Weakness, Noncompliance, Qualified Opinion Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318 states: "(i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price." 2 CFR 200.320 states: "(b) Procurement by small purchase procedures. Small purchase procedures are those relatively simple and informal procurement methods for securing services, supplies, or other property that do not cost more than the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirements. Cause: The School Corporation's management had not developed a system of internal controls to ensure compliance with the compliance requirements listed above. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: For the audit period, there were two vendors that fell within the small purchases procurement threshold. Small purchases are those vendors that the School Corporation has purchased between $10,000 - $150,000 of products and goods. During the testing of Procurement and Suspension and Debarment, we noted one instance in a sample of one, where the School Corporation did not obtain price or rate quotations from other vendors or document the basis for purchasing from the vendor that was utilized. The amount disbursed to the vendor in fiscal year 2021 and 2022 was $32,638 and $39,945, respectively. In fiscal year 2022, the School Corporation stated they had obtained two quotes, but was not able to provide documentation supporting two quotes were obtained. The School Corporation was not able to provide verification that the vendor was not suspended or debarred. The lack of controls and noncompliance occurred throughout the audit period. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish controls related to the grant agreement and the small purchase procurement method of the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
FINDING 2022-002 Information on the federal program: Subject: Special Education Cluster - Procurement Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listing Number: 84.027 and 84.173 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 20611-068-PN01, 21611-068-PN01, 20619-068-PN01, 21619-068-PN01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Finding: Material Weakness, Noncompliance, Qualified Opinion Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318 states: "(i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price." 2 CFR 200.320 states: "(b) Procurement by small purchase procedures. Small purchase procedures are those relatively simple and informal procurement methods for securing services, supplies, or other property that do not cost more than the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirements. Cause: The School Corporation's management had not developed a system of internal controls to ensure compliance with the compliance requirements listed above. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: For the audit period, there were two vendors that fell within the small purchases procurement threshold. Small purchases are those vendors that the School Corporation has purchased between $10,000 - $150,000 of products and goods. During the testing of Procurement and Suspension and Debarment, we noted one instance in a sample of one, where the School Corporation did not obtain price or rate quotations from other vendors or document the basis for purchasing from the vendor that was utilized. The amount disbursed to the vendor in fiscal year 2021 and 2022 was $32,638 and $39,945, respectively. In fiscal year 2022, the School Corporation stated they had obtained two quotes, but was not able to provide documentation supporting two quotes were obtained. The School Corporation was not able to provide verification that the vendor was not suspended or debarred. The lack of controls and noncompliance occurred throughout the audit period. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish controls related to the grant agreement and the small purchase procurement method of the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
FINDING 2022-002 Information on the federal program: Subject: Special Education Cluster - Procurement Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listing Number: 84.027 and 84.173 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 20611-068-PN01, 21611-068-PN01, 20619-068-PN01, 21619-068-PN01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Finding: Material Weakness, Noncompliance, Qualified Opinion Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318 states: "(i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price." 2 CFR 200.320 states: "(b) Procurement by small purchase procedures. Small purchase procedures are those relatively simple and informal procurement methods for securing services, supplies, or other property that do not cost more than the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirements. Cause: The School Corporation's management had not developed a system of internal controls to ensure compliance with the compliance requirements listed above. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: For the audit period, there were two vendors that fell within the small purchases procurement threshold. Small purchases are those vendors that the School Corporation has purchased between $10,000 - $150,000 of products and goods. During the testing of Procurement and Suspension and Debarment, we noted one instance in a sample of one, where the School Corporation did not obtain price or rate quotations from other vendors or document the basis for purchasing from the vendor that was utilized. The amount disbursed to the vendor in fiscal year 2021 and 2022 was $32,638 and $39,945, respectively. In fiscal year 2022, the School Corporation stated they had obtained two quotes, but was not able to provide documentation supporting two quotes were obtained. The School Corporation was not able to provide verification that the vendor was not suspended or debarred. The lack of controls and noncompliance occurred throughout the audit period. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish controls related to the grant agreement and the small purchase procurement method of the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.