2022-003—Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Federal program information: Funding agency: All Title: All Assistance Listing Number (ALN): All Award year and number: All Pass-through entity (if applicable): All Criteria: According to 2 CFR Part 200.318, a non-federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in Parts 200.317 through 200.327, including written standards of conduct covering conflicts of interest and governing the actions of its employees engaged in the selection, award and administration of contracts. Condition: The Institute has not developed and approved policies and procedures over procurement, suspension and debarment as required by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs: None. Context: N/A Cause: The Institute had never been subject to an external audit prior to 2021 and had not developed formal policies and procedures over procurement, among others. Effect: The Institute is not in compliance with the Uniform Guidance general procurement standards at 2 CFR Part 200.318. Auditor’s Recommendations: The Institute should development written policies and procedures over procurement, suspension and debarment that meets the requirements of 2 CFR Parts 200.317 through 200.327. Management’s Response: Management of the Institute did not provide any comments in response to this finding.
2022-003—Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Federal program information: Funding agency: All Title: All Assistance Listing Number (ALN): All Award year and number: All Pass-through entity (if applicable): All Criteria: According to 2 CFR Part 200.318, a non-federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in Parts 200.317 through 200.327, including written standards of conduct covering conflicts of interest and governing the actions of its employees engaged in the selection, award and administration of contracts. Condition: The Institute has not developed and approved policies and procedures over procurement, suspension and debarment as required by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs: None. Context: N/A Cause: The Institute had never been subject to an external audit prior to 2021 and had not developed formal policies and procedures over procurement, among others. Effect: The Institute is not in compliance with the Uniform Guidance general procurement standards at 2 CFR Part 200.318. Auditor’s Recommendations: The Institute should development written policies and procedures over procurement, suspension and debarment that meets the requirements of 2 CFR Parts 200.317 through 200.327. Management’s Response: Management of the Institute did not provide any comments in response to this finding.
2022-003—Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Federal program information: Funding agency: All Title: All Assistance Listing Number (ALN): All Award year and number: All Pass-through entity (if applicable): All Criteria: According to 2 CFR Part 200.318, a non-federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in Parts 200.317 through 200.327, including written standards of conduct covering conflicts of interest and governing the actions of its employees engaged in the selection, award and administration of contracts. Condition: The Institute has not developed and approved policies and procedures over procurement, suspension and debarment as required by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs: None. Context: N/A Cause: The Institute had never been subject to an external audit prior to 2021 and had not developed formal policies and procedures over procurement, among others. Effect: The Institute is not in compliance with the Uniform Guidance general procurement standards at 2 CFR Part 200.318. Auditor’s Recommendations: The Institute should development written policies and procedures over procurement, suspension and debarment that meets the requirements of 2 CFR Parts 200.317 through 200.327. Management’s Response: Management of the Institute did not provide any comments in response to this finding.
2022-003—Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Federal program information: Funding agency: All Title: All Assistance Listing Number (ALN): All Award year and number: All Pass-through entity (if applicable): All Criteria: According to 2 CFR Part 200.318, a non-federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in Parts 200.317 through 200.327, including written standards of conduct covering conflicts of interest and governing the actions of its employees engaged in the selection, award and administration of contracts. Condition: The Institute has not developed and approved policies and procedures over procurement, suspension and debarment as required by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs: None. Context: N/A Cause: The Institute had never been subject to an external audit prior to 2021 and had not developed formal policies and procedures over procurement, among others. Effect: The Institute is not in compliance with the Uniform Guidance general procurement standards at 2 CFR Part 200.318. Auditor’s Recommendations: The Institute should development written policies and procedures over procurement, suspension and debarment that meets the requirements of 2 CFR Parts 200.317 through 200.327. Management’s Response: Management of the Institute did not provide any comments in response to this finding.
2022-003—Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Federal program information: Funding agency: All Title: All Assistance Listing Number (ALN): All Award year and number: All Pass-through entity (if applicable): All Criteria: According to 2 CFR Part 200.318, a non-federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in Parts 200.317 through 200.327, including written standards of conduct covering conflicts of interest and governing the actions of its employees engaged in the selection, award and administration of contracts. Condition: The Institute has not developed and approved policies and procedures over procurement, suspension and debarment as required by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs: None. Context: N/A Cause: The Institute had never been subject to an external audit prior to 2021 and had not developed formal policies and procedures over procurement, among others. Effect: The Institute is not in compliance with the Uniform Guidance general procurement standards at 2 CFR Part 200.318. Auditor’s Recommendations: The Institute should development written policies and procedures over procurement, suspension and debarment that meets the requirements of 2 CFR Parts 200.317 through 200.327. Management’s Response: Management of the Institute did not provide any comments in response to this finding.
2022-003—Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Federal program information: Funding agency: All Title: All Assistance Listing Number (ALN): All Award year and number: All Pass-through entity (if applicable): All Criteria: According to 2 CFR Part 200.318, a non-federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in Parts 200.317 through 200.327, including written standards of conduct covering conflicts of interest and governing the actions of its employees engaged in the selection, award and administration of contracts. Condition: The Institute has not developed and approved policies and procedures over procurement, suspension and debarment as required by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs: None. Context: N/A Cause: The Institute had never been subject to an external audit prior to 2021 and had not developed formal policies and procedures over procurement, among others. Effect: The Institute is not in compliance with the Uniform Guidance general procurement standards at 2 CFR Part 200.318. Auditor’s Recommendations: The Institute should development written policies and procedures over procurement, suspension and debarment that meets the requirements of 2 CFR Parts 200.317 through 200.327. Management’s Response: Management of the Institute did not provide any comments in response to this finding.
Criteria: A non-federal entity is required to have certain written policies and procedure in compliance with Uniform Guidance and must comply with the procurement standards as described in 2 CFR 200.318 through 2 CFR 200.327. Specifically, the non-federal entity must comply with the following: • The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. • If the non-Federal entity has a parent, affiliate, or subsidiary organization that is not a State, local government, or Indian tribe, the non-Federal entity must also maintain written standards of conduct covering organizational conflicts of interest. Organizational conflicts of interest means that because of relationships with a parent company, affiliate, or subsidiary organization, the non-Federal entity is unable or appears to be unable to be impartial in conducting a procurement action involving a related organization. Condition: AIRS does not appear to have created written purchasing or procurement policies and procedures as required by 2 CFR 200.318(a). Since AIRS is an affiliate organization of the Ethiopian Community Development Council (ECDC), it appears that the relationship between AIRS and ECDC meets the “affiliate” requirement under 2 CFR 200.318 (c) (2). It does appear that AIRS has created written standards of conduct covering organizational conflicts of interest. Cause: Management has not created or maintained certain written policies and procedures as required under 2 CFR 200.318. Effect: AIRS is not in compliance with certain written policies and procedures as required under 2 CFR 200.318. Questioned Costs: None reported Repeat Finding from Prior Year: Yes Recommendation: In response to Finding 2021-006 during the audit for the year ended September 30, 2021, management has started the process of creating, updating and revising its written policies and procedures. I commend management for their efforts. However, I strongly recommend that management and board complete the written procurement policies and procedures and written standards of conduct covering organizational conflicts of interest prior to start of the 2023 audit. Views of Responsible Officials: Management concurs with this audit finding.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - 21.027 U.S. Department of the Treasury Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Federal Award Identification Number and Year - YDYNCVFA9NH4 Pass through Entity - City of Raleigh, North Carolina Finding Type - Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.318 requires that a nonfederal entity that acquires property or services under a federal award or subaward is required to adopt, maintain, and follow written procurement procedures, which comply with sections 2 CFR 200.318 through 327. Condition - WakeMed does not have a written policy in place over procurement methods, which covers 2 CFR 200.318 200.327, nor did WakeMed follow required procurement guidelines. Questioned Costs - $1,010,233 Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - Questioned costs reflect the entire amount of costs expended under the grant during 2022. Context - WakeMed did not have a written policy in place over procurement methods, which covers 2 CFR 200.318 200.327, when the grant was awarded. In addition, WakeMed did not follow required procurement procedures related to expenditures under the grant, including a competitive bid process for costs charged to the grant as WakeMed entered into the construction contract prior to being awarded the funds. Cause and Effect - Failure to comply with the terms and conditions of the grant agreement, including procurement provisions, where controls were not in place to identify the requirement to have a written procurement policy and follow 2 CFR 200.318 200.327. Recommendation - WakeMed should develop a written procurement policy, which complies with the 2 CFR 200.318 200.327 sections, and ensure controls are in place to comply with the procurement policy on an ongoing basis. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - Management agrees with the finding as reported. WakeMed is in the process of updating their existing procurement policy to include the relevant sections from the Code of Federal Regulations and will provide education to the areas involved in procurement and use of federal funds on these requirements.
2022-004 Procurement - Material Weakness Criteria: The Town must follow the procurement standards et out at 2CFR section 200.318 through 200.326. This requires bids be placed for purchases ranging from $10,000-$250,000. The Town currently has policies in place utilizing the state library listing of approved vendors for potential purchases over $50,000. The CFR does allow an entity to increase the lower limit from $10,000 to $50,000 in certain circumstances. One of the conditions is that the entity qualifies as a low risk entity. The Town currently does not qualify as a low risk entity therefore the Town does not qualify for the increase of the lower limit. Sole source vendors are the exception to this rule. Condition: The Town did not obtained 3 bids for over $10,000 purchases. The Town did use the State's liability to identify eligible vendors but failed to get bids. Cause: The Town has had significant difficulties in retaining both a Town Clerk and Accountant who have the capacity to follow procurement policies. This caused purchases to be made without following required procurement procedures. Effect: The Town is not in compliance with the Uniform Guidance and therefore, the Town bas the possibility of not being able to renew contracts in the future. Recommendation: We recommend that the Town follow the procurement policy to comply with federal guidance. Views of Responsible Officias and Planned Corrective Actions: See Corrective Action Plan.
2022-002—Unallowable Gift Card Disbursements Charged to Federal Program Type of Finding: (F) Instance of Noncompliance Related to Federal Awards Funding Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services AL #: 93.231 – COVID-19: Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity Award #: Various Award Period: 09/30/2021 – 09/29/2026 Estimated Questioned Costs: $15,300 Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Statement of Condition AAIHB distributed gift cards to both salaried employees and independent contractors as a gesture of appreciation for working extended hours related to COVID-19 contact tracing efforts. The total value of the gift cards was approximately $15,300 and was charged to the COVID-19: Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity grant (AL #93.231). For contractors, these gift cards were provided in addition to their regular compensation. The gift card disbursements were not processed through payroll nor formalized in contract terms, and there is no documentation indicating the entity obtained approval from the awarding agency. Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR § 200.403, costs charged to federal awards must be necessary, reasonable, allocable, and conform to limitations set forth in federal regulations. Per 2 CFR § 200.421(e)(3), the cost of gifts—including cash or cash equivalents such as gift cards—is generally unallowable. Compensation for employees must comply with 2 CFR § 200.430, including support through written policies and documentation of time and effort. Contractor payments must align with procurement standards in 2 CFR § 200.318–200.324 and be governed by written contracts. Effect The use of federal funds to provide gift cards constitutes an unallowable cost under Uniform Guidance. The questioned amount may be subject to repayment to the awarding agency or passthrough entity. Cause The auditee sought to recognize the extraordinary efforts of personnel during the COVID-19 public health response. However, they were unaware that the use of gift cards for this purpose was inconsistent with Uniform Guidance and lacked prior approval or supporting policy. Recommendation We recommend the auditee discontinue the use of federal funds for gift card distributions. All compensation for employees should be processed through payroll, supported by appropriate documentation and internal policies. Payments to contractors should be governed by written contracts and comply with applicable procurement standards. If the auditee believes these costs are justifiable, they should consult the awarding agency for a determination and, if necessary, reimburse the federal award.
2022-002—Unallowable Gift Card Disbursements Charged to Federal Program Type of Finding: (F) Instance of Noncompliance Related to Federal Awards Funding Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services AL #: 93.231 – COVID-19: Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity Award #: Various Award Period: 09/30/2021 – 09/29/2026 Estimated Questioned Costs: $15,300 Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Statement of Condition AAIHB distributed gift cards to both salaried employees and independent contractors as a gesture of appreciation for working extended hours related to COVID-19 contact tracing efforts. The total value of the gift cards was approximately $15,300 and was charged to the COVID-19: Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity grant (AL #93.231). For contractors, these gift cards were provided in addition to their regular compensation. The gift card disbursements were not processed through payroll nor formalized in contract terms, and there is no documentation indicating the entity obtained approval from the awarding agency. Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR § 200.403, costs charged to federal awards must be necessary, reasonable, allocable, and conform to limitations set forth in federal regulations. Per 2 CFR § 200.421(e)(3), the cost of gifts—including cash or cash equivalents such as gift cards—is generally unallowable. Compensation for employees must comply with 2 CFR § 200.430, including support through written policies and documentation of time and effort. Contractor payments must align with procurement standards in 2 CFR § 200.318–200.324 and be governed by written contracts. Effect The use of federal funds to provide gift cards constitutes an unallowable cost under Uniform Guidance. The questioned amount may be subject to repayment to the awarding agency or passthrough entity. Cause The auditee sought to recognize the extraordinary efforts of personnel during the COVID-19 public health response. However, they were unaware that the use of gift cards for this purpose was inconsistent with Uniform Guidance and lacked prior approval or supporting policy. Recommendation We recommend the auditee discontinue the use of federal funds for gift card distributions. All compensation for employees should be processed through payroll, supported by appropriate documentation and internal policies. Payments to contractors should be governed by written contracts and comply with applicable procurement standards. If the auditee believes these costs are justifiable, they should consult the awarding agency for a determination and, if necessary, reimburse the federal award.
2022-002—Unallowable Gift Card Disbursements Charged to Federal Program Type of Finding: (F) Instance of Noncompliance Related to Federal Awards Funding Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services AL #: 93.231 – COVID-19: Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity Award #: Various Award Period: 09/30/2021 – 09/29/2026 Estimated Questioned Costs: $15,300 Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Statement of Condition AAIHB distributed gift cards to both salaried employees and independent contractors as a gesture of appreciation for working extended hours related to COVID-19 contact tracing efforts. The total value of the gift cards was approximately $15,300 and was charged to the COVID-19: Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity grant (AL #93.231). For contractors, these gift cards were provided in addition to their regular compensation. The gift card disbursements were not processed through payroll nor formalized in contract terms, and there is no documentation indicating the entity obtained approval from the awarding agency. Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR § 200.403, costs charged to federal awards must be necessary, reasonable, allocable, and conform to limitations set forth in federal regulations. Per 2 CFR § 200.421(e)(3), the cost of gifts—including cash or cash equivalents such as gift cards—is generally unallowable. Compensation for employees must comply with 2 CFR § 200.430, including support through written policies and documentation of time and effort. Contractor payments must align with procurement standards in 2 CFR § 200.318–200.324 and be governed by written contracts. Effect The use of federal funds to provide gift cards constitutes an unallowable cost under Uniform Guidance. The questioned amount may be subject to repayment to the awarding agency or passthrough entity. Cause The auditee sought to recognize the extraordinary efforts of personnel during the COVID-19 public health response. However, they were unaware that the use of gift cards for this purpose was inconsistent with Uniform Guidance and lacked prior approval or supporting policy. Recommendation We recommend the auditee discontinue the use of federal funds for gift card distributions. All compensation for employees should be processed through payroll, supported by appropriate documentation and internal policies. Payments to contractors should be governed by written contracts and comply with applicable procurement standards. If the auditee believes these costs are justifiable, they should consult the awarding agency for a determination and, if necessary, reimburse the federal award.
2022-002—Unallowable Gift Card Disbursements Charged to Federal Program Type of Finding: (F) Instance of Noncompliance Related to Federal Awards Funding Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services AL #: 93.231 – COVID-19: Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity Award #: Various Award Period: 09/30/2021 – 09/29/2026 Estimated Questioned Costs: $15,300 Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Statement of Condition AAIHB distributed gift cards to both salaried employees and independent contractors as a gesture of appreciation for working extended hours related to COVID-19 contact tracing efforts. The total value of the gift cards was approximately $15,300 and was charged to the COVID-19: Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity grant (AL #93.231). For contractors, these gift cards were provided in addition to their regular compensation. The gift card disbursements were not processed through payroll nor formalized in contract terms, and there is no documentation indicating the entity obtained approval from the awarding agency. Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR § 200.403, costs charged to federal awards must be necessary, reasonable, allocable, and conform to limitations set forth in federal regulations. Per 2 CFR § 200.421(e)(3), the cost of gifts—including cash or cash equivalents such as gift cards—is generally unallowable. Compensation for employees must comply with 2 CFR § 200.430, including support through written policies and documentation of time and effort. Contractor payments must align with procurement standards in 2 CFR § 200.318–200.324 and be governed by written contracts. Effect The use of federal funds to provide gift cards constitutes an unallowable cost under Uniform Guidance. The questioned amount may be subject to repayment to the awarding agency or passthrough entity. Cause The auditee sought to recognize the extraordinary efforts of personnel during the COVID-19 public health response. However, they were unaware that the use of gift cards for this purpose was inconsistent with Uniform Guidance and lacked prior approval or supporting policy. Recommendation We recommend the auditee discontinue the use of federal funds for gift card distributions. All compensation for employees should be processed through payroll, supported by appropriate documentation and internal policies. Payments to contractors should be governed by written contracts and comply with applicable procurement standards. If the auditee believes these costs are justifiable, they should consult the awarding agency for a determination and, if necessary, reimburse the federal award.
2022-002—Unallowable Gift Card Disbursements Charged to Federal Program Type of Finding: (F) Instance of Noncompliance Related to Federal Awards Funding Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services AL #: 93.231 – COVID-19: Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity Award #: Various Award Period: 09/30/2021 – 09/29/2026 Estimated Questioned Costs: $15,300 Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Statement of Condition AAIHB distributed gift cards to both salaried employees and independent contractors as a gesture of appreciation for working extended hours related to COVID-19 contact tracing efforts. The total value of the gift cards was approximately $15,300 and was charged to the COVID-19: Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity grant (AL #93.231). For contractors, these gift cards were provided in addition to their regular compensation. The gift card disbursements were not processed through payroll nor formalized in contract terms, and there is no documentation indicating the entity obtained approval from the awarding agency. Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR § 200.403, costs charged to federal awards must be necessary, reasonable, allocable, and conform to limitations set forth in federal regulations. Per 2 CFR § 200.421(e)(3), the cost of gifts—including cash or cash equivalents such as gift cards—is generally unallowable. Compensation for employees must comply with 2 CFR § 200.430, including support through written policies and documentation of time and effort. Contractor payments must align with procurement standards in 2 CFR § 200.318–200.324 and be governed by written contracts. Effect The use of federal funds to provide gift cards constitutes an unallowable cost under Uniform Guidance. The questioned amount may be subject to repayment to the awarding agency or passthrough entity. Cause The auditee sought to recognize the extraordinary efforts of personnel during the COVID-19 public health response. However, they were unaware that the use of gift cards for this purpose was inconsistent with Uniform Guidance and lacked prior approval or supporting policy. Recommendation We recommend the auditee discontinue the use of federal funds for gift card distributions. All compensation for employees should be processed through payroll, supported by appropriate documentation and internal policies. Payments to contractors should be governed by written contracts and comply with applicable procurement standards. If the auditee believes these costs are justifiable, they should consult the awarding agency for a determination and, if necessary, reimburse the federal award.
2022-002—Unallowable Gift Card Disbursements Charged to Federal Program Type of Finding: (F) Instance of Noncompliance Related to Federal Awards Funding Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services AL #: 93.231 – COVID-19: Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity Award #: Various Award Period: 09/30/2021 – 09/29/2026 Estimated Questioned Costs: $15,300 Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Statement of Condition AAIHB distributed gift cards to both salaried employees and independent contractors as a gesture of appreciation for working extended hours related to COVID-19 contact tracing efforts. The total value of the gift cards was approximately $15,300 and was charged to the COVID-19: Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity grant (AL #93.231). For contractors, these gift cards were provided in addition to their regular compensation. The gift card disbursements were not processed through payroll nor formalized in contract terms, and there is no documentation indicating the entity obtained approval from the awarding agency. Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR § 200.403, costs charged to federal awards must be necessary, reasonable, allocable, and conform to limitations set forth in federal regulations. Per 2 CFR § 200.421(e)(3), the cost of gifts—including cash or cash equivalents such as gift cards—is generally unallowable. Compensation for employees must comply with 2 CFR § 200.430, including support through written policies and documentation of time and effort. Contractor payments must align with procurement standards in 2 CFR § 200.318–200.324 and be governed by written contracts. Effect The use of federal funds to provide gift cards constitutes an unallowable cost under Uniform Guidance. The questioned amount may be subject to repayment to the awarding agency or passthrough entity. Cause The auditee sought to recognize the extraordinary efforts of personnel during the COVID-19 public health response. However, they were unaware that the use of gift cards for this purpose was inconsistent with Uniform Guidance and lacked prior approval or supporting policy. Recommendation We recommend the auditee discontinue the use of federal funds for gift card distributions. All compensation for employees should be processed through payroll, supported by appropriate documentation and internal policies. Payments to contractors should be governed by written contracts and comply with applicable procurement standards. If the auditee believes these costs are justifiable, they should consult the awarding agency for a determination and, if necessary, reimburse the federal award.
Reference Number: 2022-001 Prior Year Finding: Yes – 2021-001 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Pass-through Agency: Various Federal Program: Emergency Solutions Grant Program ALN Number: 14.231 Compliance Requirement: Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Type of Finding: Material Weakness, Noncompliance Criteria or specific requirement: As per § 200.318 General procurement standards. (a) The Non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. (d) The Non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Condition: Based on our review of the Procurement compliance requirements, we noted that the Division has written procurement policies and competitive policies as required by CFR § 200.318 General procurement standards. We selected five (5) vendors for procurement Suspension and Debarment compliance testing of total population of 5 vendors subject to procurement and we were not provided with Procurement comparative bids therefore, we were unable: • To verify that the procurement method used was appropriate based on the dollar amount and conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320. • To Verify that procurements provide full and open competition (2 CFR section 200.319 and 48 CFR section 52.244-5). Cause: The Division did not ensured that as a non-Federal entity must have and must use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, and local laws and regulations and the standards of §§ 200.318 through 200.327, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. Effect: The funding agency can reject the expenditures incurred by the Division on certain vendors where the Division must use procurement method appropriately based on the dollar amount and conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320. Questioned costs: Cannot be determined Recommendation: We recommend that the Division must: • Use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, and local, laws and regulations and the standards, for the acquisition of property or services required under a federal award or subaward. • The Division must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records should include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Views of responsible officials: The Division will work with Territorial Headquarters to document procedures as outlined in the Recommendations above. See corrective action plan.
Reference Number: 2022-001 Prior Year Finding: Yes – 2021-001 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Pass-through Agency: Various Federal Program: Emergency Solutions Grant Program ALN Number: 14.231 Compliance Requirement: Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Type of Finding: Material Weakness, Noncompliance Criteria or specific requirement: As per § 200.318 General procurement standards. (a) The Non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. (d) The Non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Condition: Based on our review of the Procurement compliance requirements, we noted that the Division has written procurement policies and competitive policies as required by CFR § 200.318 General procurement standards. We selected five (5) vendors for procurement Suspension and Debarment compliance testing of total population of 5 vendors subject to procurement and we were not provided with Procurement comparative bids therefore, we were unable: • To verify that the procurement method used was appropriate based on the dollar amount and conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320. • To Verify that procurements provide full and open competition (2 CFR section 200.319 and 48 CFR section 52.244-5). Cause: The Division did not ensured that as a non-Federal entity must have and must use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, and local laws and regulations and the standards of §§ 200.318 through 200.327, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. Effect: The funding agency can reject the expenditures incurred by the Division on certain vendors where the Division must use procurement method appropriately based on the dollar amount and conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320. Questioned costs: Cannot be determined Recommendation: We recommend that the Division must: • Use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, and local, laws and regulations and the standards, for the acquisition of property or services required under a federal award or subaward. • The Division must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records should include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Views of responsible officials: The Division will work with Territorial Headquarters to document procedures as outlined in the Recommendations above. See corrective action plan.
Reference Number: 2022-001 Prior Year Finding: Yes – 2021-001 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Pass-through Agency: Various Federal Program: Emergency Solutions Grant Program ALN Number: 14.231 Compliance Requirement: Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Type of Finding: Material Weakness, Noncompliance Criteria or specific requirement: As per § 200.318 General procurement standards. (a) The Non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. (d) The Non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Condition: Based on our review of the Procurement compliance requirements, we noted that the Division has written procurement policies and competitive policies as required by CFR § 200.318 General procurement standards. We selected five (5) vendors for procurement Suspension and Debarment compliance testing of total population of 5 vendors subject to procurement and we were not provided with Procurement comparative bids therefore, we were unable: • To verify that the procurement method used was appropriate based on the dollar amount and conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320. • To Verify that procurements provide full and open competition (2 CFR section 200.319 and 48 CFR section 52.244-5). Cause: The Division did not ensured that as a non-Federal entity must have and must use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, and local laws and regulations and the standards of §§ 200.318 through 200.327, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. Effect: The funding agency can reject the expenditures incurred by the Division on certain vendors where the Division must use procurement method appropriately based on the dollar amount and conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320. Questioned costs: Cannot be determined Recommendation: We recommend that the Division must: • Use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, and local, laws and regulations and the standards, for the acquisition of property or services required under a federal award or subaward. • The Division must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records should include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Views of responsible officials: The Division will work with Territorial Headquarters to document procedures as outlined in the Recommendations above. See corrective action plan.
Reference Number: 2022-001 Prior Year Finding: Yes – 2021-001 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Pass-through Agency: Various Federal Program: Emergency Solutions Grant Program ALN Number: 14.231 Compliance Requirement: Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Type of Finding: Material Weakness, Noncompliance Criteria or specific requirement: As per § 200.318 General procurement standards. (a) The Non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. (d) The Non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Condition: Based on our review of the Procurement compliance requirements, we noted that the Division has written procurement policies and competitive policies as required by CFR § 200.318 General procurement standards. We selected five (5) vendors for procurement Suspension and Debarment compliance testing of total population of 5 vendors subject to procurement and we were not provided with Procurement comparative bids therefore, we were unable: • To verify that the procurement method used was appropriate based on the dollar amount and conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320. • To Verify that procurements provide full and open competition (2 CFR section 200.319 and 48 CFR section 52.244-5). Cause: The Division did not ensured that as a non-Federal entity must have and must use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, and local laws and regulations and the standards of §§ 200.318 through 200.327, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. Effect: The funding agency can reject the expenditures incurred by the Division on certain vendors where the Division must use procurement method appropriately based on the dollar amount and conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320. Questioned costs: Cannot be determined Recommendation: We recommend that the Division must: • Use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, and local, laws and regulations and the standards, for the acquisition of property or services required under a federal award or subaward. • The Division must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records should include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Views of responsible officials: The Division will work with Territorial Headquarters to document procedures as outlined in the Recommendations above. See corrective action plan.
Reference Number: 2022-001 Prior Year Finding: Yes – 2021-001 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Pass-through Agency: Various Federal Program: Emergency Solutions Grant Program ALN Number: 14.231 Compliance Requirement: Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Type of Finding: Material Weakness, Noncompliance Criteria or specific requirement: As per § 200.318 General procurement standards. (a) The Non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. (d) The Non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Condition: Based on our review of the Procurement compliance requirements, we noted that the Division has written procurement policies and competitive policies as required by CFR § 200.318 General procurement standards. We selected five (5) vendors for procurement Suspension and Debarment compliance testing of total population of 5 vendors subject to procurement and we were not provided with Procurement comparative bids therefore, we were unable: • To verify that the procurement method used was appropriate based on the dollar amount and conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320. • To Verify that procurements provide full and open competition (2 CFR section 200.319 and 48 CFR section 52.244-5). Cause: The Division did not ensured that as a non-Federal entity must have and must use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, and local laws and regulations and the standards of §§ 200.318 through 200.327, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. Effect: The funding agency can reject the expenditures incurred by the Division on certain vendors where the Division must use procurement method appropriately based on the dollar amount and conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320. Questioned costs: Cannot be determined Recommendation: We recommend that the Division must: • Use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, and local, laws and regulations and the standards, for the acquisition of property or services required under a federal award or subaward. • The Division must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records should include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Views of responsible officials: The Division will work with Territorial Headquarters to document procedures as outlined in the Recommendations above. See corrective action plan.
Reference Number: 2022-001 Prior Year Finding: Yes – 2021-001 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Pass-through Agency: Various Federal Program: Emergency Solutions Grant Program ALN Number: 14.231 Compliance Requirement: Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Type of Finding: Material Weakness, Noncompliance Criteria or specific requirement: As per § 200.318 General procurement standards. (a) The Non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. (d) The Non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Condition: Based on our review of the Procurement compliance requirements, we noted that the Division has written procurement policies and competitive policies as required by CFR § 200.318 General procurement standards. We selected five (5) vendors for procurement Suspension and Debarment compliance testing of total population of 5 vendors subject to procurement and we were not provided with Procurement comparative bids therefore, we were unable: • To verify that the procurement method used was appropriate based on the dollar amount and conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320. • To Verify that procurements provide full and open competition (2 CFR section 200.319 and 48 CFR section 52.244-5). Cause: The Division did not ensured that as a non-Federal entity must have and must use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, and local laws and regulations and the standards of §§ 200.318 through 200.327, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. Effect: The funding agency can reject the expenditures incurred by the Division on certain vendors where the Division must use procurement method appropriately based on the dollar amount and conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320. Questioned costs: Cannot be determined Recommendation: We recommend that the Division must: • Use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, and local, laws and regulations and the standards, for the acquisition of property or services required under a federal award or subaward. • The Division must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records should include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Views of responsible officials: The Division will work with Territorial Headquarters to document procedures as outlined in the Recommendations above. See corrective action plan.
Reference Number: 2022-001 Prior Year Finding: Yes – 2021-001 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Pass-through Agency: Various Federal Program: Emergency Solutions Grant Program ALN Number: 14.231 Compliance Requirement: Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Type of Finding: Material Weakness, Noncompliance Criteria or specific requirement: As per § 200.318 General procurement standards. (a) The Non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. (d) The Non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Condition: Based on our review of the Procurement compliance requirements, we noted that the Division has written procurement policies and competitive policies as required by CFR § 200.318 General procurement standards. We selected five (5) vendors for procurement Suspension and Debarment compliance testing of total population of 5 vendors subject to procurement and we were not provided with Procurement comparative bids therefore, we were unable: • To verify that the procurement method used was appropriate based on the dollar amount and conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320. • To Verify that procurements provide full and open competition (2 CFR section 200.319 and 48 CFR section 52.244-5). Cause: The Division did not ensured that as a non-Federal entity must have and must use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, and local laws and regulations and the standards of §§ 200.318 through 200.327, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. Effect: The funding agency can reject the expenditures incurred by the Division on certain vendors where the Division must use procurement method appropriately based on the dollar amount and conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320. Questioned costs: Cannot be determined Recommendation: We recommend that the Division must: • Use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, and local, laws and regulations and the standards, for the acquisition of property or services required under a federal award or subaward. • The Division must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records should include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Views of responsible officials: The Division will work with Territorial Headquarters to document procedures as outlined in the Recommendations above. See corrective action plan.
Criteria: Uniform Guidance requires organizations to have and document procurement and suspension and debarment procedures for the acquisition of property under a federal award in accordance with 2 CFR 200.318. Condition: The Council did not comply with the Uniform Guidance requirement for the Council to have and document procurement procedures for the acquisition of property under a federal award. Questioned Costs: $0 Cause: The Council’s internal control did not identify and establish policies for procurement and suspension and debarment; and the Council did not comply with federal requirements regarding procurement and suspension and debarment. Effect: The Council was not in compliance with Uniform Guidance 2 CFR 200.318. Recommendation: We recommend the Council develop and adopt a formal policy on procurement and suspension and debarment. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The Council began a building renovation project before it became aware that funds were available to support the project. Therefore, the Council was not able to comply with regulations at the time of project design, bidding, planning, and construction. In addition, the Council’s project was only partially funded by the Coronavirus Recovery Funds, the majority of the project was funded through the Council’s fundraising efforts. Management agrees with the finding and is in the process of implementing the recommended procedures for future projects.
Federal Programs Information: Funding Agency: Department of Health and Human Services Title: Head Start Assistance Listing Number: 93.600 Award Period: September 1, 2021 ? August 31, 2022, September 1, 2022 ? August 31, 2023 Funding Agency: Department of Health and Human Services Title: Indian Self-Determination Assistance Listing Number: 93.441 Award Period: January 1, 2022 ? December 31, 2024 Criteria: The Office?s policies and procedures contains various requirements, including policies requiring certain levels of administrative and legal review, obtaining one or more written bids at various dollar thresholds, and requiring different levels of approval based on dollar values. Uniform Guidance regulations section CFR 200.318(a) and CFR 200.320(a) state, the non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable State, local, and tribal laws and regulations, provided that the procurement conform to applicable Federal law and the standards identified. Condition: For Head Start, in our selected sample of 41 expenditures, we noted an expenditure of $208,932 that required either a sole source form or three written bids, and a legal review per the Office?s policy. These forms were not obtained. There was sole source justification; however, it was written by the vendor. The Tribal Council approved the purchase, but the resolution didn?t mention the vendor and/or the need to sole source the purchase. For Indian Self-Determination, in our selected sample of 40 expenditures, we noted an expenditure of $7,772 that did not have the required three written bids, an expenditure for $15,331 that did not have the required governor?s signature, and an expenditure that was approved for $365 but was later revised to $640 without any additional approvals. Questioned Costs: None. Context: 4 of 81 transactions tested across these two programs were missing documentation required by the Office?s procurement policy. Cause: The Office?s policies and procedures were not always being enforced or being followed. Additionally, the Office?s procurement policy requires sole source documentation for certain expenditures and contracts where the bidding process is bypassed, but the Office has not developed such a form. Effect: The Office was not in compliance with procurement standards and made payments during the year that were in violation of their policy. Auditors? Recommendation: We recommend the Office adhere to the procurement policy that it has developed, and we recommend a sole source form be generated that conforms to the requirements of the procurement policy. Management?s Response: For Head Start ? The Office?s procurement policy allows for sole source procurement if Tribal Council specifically authorizes its use. For the Head Start expenditure of $208,932, Tribal Council Resolution 08-2021-36 specifically approved this expenditure. The Office?s procurement policy does reference a sole source form. However, a sole source form was never created when the procurement policy was approved by Tribal Council. Therefore, a memo justifying the sole source procurement was accepted as sufficient documentation and justification of the sole source procurement. Because this was a sole source procurement, three written bids were not required. Also, legal review is not required for this expenditure because it is a purchase of goods. Legal review is only required for purchase of services above a certain threshold. The Office is in the process of updating its procurement policy and will create a sole source justification form in connection with the update. For Indian Self-Determination ? The Office acknowledges the lack of three written bids for a $7,772 expenditure. Only one written quote was obtained for this purchase. The Office also acknowledges the lack of Governor?s signature on a $15,331 purchase requisition. A new Administrative Assistant issued this purchase requisition and was not properly trained on obtaining Governor?s signature for all purchase requisitions greater than $5,000. It should be noted that Governor signed the check related to this expenditure so was able to see the purchase at that time. The Office also acknowledges a revision was not made to a $365 purchase requisition when an additional purchase was added to the approved purchase requisition.
Federal Programs Information: Funding Agency: Department of Health and Human Services Title: Head Start Assistance Listing Number: 93.600 Award Period: September 1, 2021 ? August 31, 2022, September 1, 2022 ? August 31, 2023 Funding Agency: Department of Health and Human Services Title: Indian Self-Determination Assistance Listing Number: 93.441 Award Period: January 1, 2022 ? December 31, 2024 Criteria: The Office?s policies and procedures contains various requirements, including policies requiring certain levels of administrative and legal review, obtaining one or more written bids at various dollar thresholds, and requiring different levels of approval based on dollar values. Uniform Guidance regulations section CFR 200.318(a) and CFR 200.320(a) state, the non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable State, local, and tribal laws and regulations, provided that the procurement conform to applicable Federal law and the standards identified. Condition: For Head Start, in our selected sample of 41 expenditures, we noted an expenditure of $208,932 that required either a sole source form or three written bids, and a legal review per the Office?s policy. These forms were not obtained. There was sole source justification; however, it was written by the vendor. The Tribal Council approved the purchase, but the resolution didn?t mention the vendor and/or the need to sole source the purchase. For Indian Self-Determination, in our selected sample of 40 expenditures, we noted an expenditure of $7,772 that did not have the required three written bids, an expenditure for $15,331 that did not have the required governor?s signature, and an expenditure that was approved for $365 but was later revised to $640 without any additional approvals. Questioned Costs: None. Context: 4 of 81 transactions tested across these two programs were missing documentation required by the Office?s procurement policy. Cause: The Office?s policies and procedures were not always being enforced or being followed. Additionally, the Office?s procurement policy requires sole source documentation for certain expenditures and contracts where the bidding process is bypassed, but the Office has not developed such a form. Effect: The Office was not in compliance with procurement standards and made payments during the year that were in violation of their policy. Auditors? Recommendation: We recommend the Office adhere to the procurement policy that it has developed, and we recommend a sole source form be generated that conforms to the requirements of the procurement policy. Management?s Response: For Head Start ? The Office?s procurement policy allows for sole source procurement if Tribal Council specifically authorizes its use. For the Head Start expenditure of $208,932, Tribal Council Resolution 08-2021-36 specifically approved this expenditure. The Office?s procurement policy does reference a sole source form. However, a sole source form was never created when the procurement policy was approved by Tribal Council. Therefore, a memo justifying the sole source procurement was accepted as sufficient documentation and justification of the sole source procurement. Because this was a sole source procurement, three written bids were not required. Also, legal review is not required for this expenditure because it is a purchase of goods. Legal review is only required for purchase of services above a certain threshold. The Office is in the process of updating its procurement policy and will create a sole source justification form in connection with the update. For Indian Self-Determination ? The Office acknowledges the lack of three written bids for a $7,772 expenditure. Only one written quote was obtained for this purchase. The Office also acknowledges the lack of Governor?s signature on a $15,331 purchase requisition. A new Administrative Assistant issued this purchase requisition and was not properly trained on obtaining Governor?s signature for all purchase requisitions greater than $5,000. It should be noted that Governor signed the check related to this expenditure so was able to see the purchase at that time. The Office also acknowledges a revision was not made to a $365 purchase requisition when an additional purchase was added to the approved purchase requisition.
Federal Programs Information: Funding Agency: Department of Health and Human Services Title: Head Start Assistance Listing Number: 93.600 Award Period: September 1, 2021 ? August 31, 2022, September 1, 2022 ? August 31, 2023 Funding Agency: Department of Health and Human Services Title: Indian Self-Determination Assistance Listing Number: 93.441 Award Period: January 1, 2022 ? December 31, 2024 Criteria: The Office?s policies and procedures contains various requirements, including policies requiring certain levels of administrative and legal review, obtaining one or more written bids at various dollar thresholds, and requiring different levels of approval based on dollar values. Uniform Guidance regulations section CFR 200.318(a) and CFR 200.320(a) state, the non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable State, local, and tribal laws and regulations, provided that the procurement conform to applicable Federal law and the standards identified. Condition: For Head Start, in our selected sample of 41 expenditures, we noted an expenditure of $208,932 that required either a sole source form or three written bids, and a legal review per the Office?s policy. These forms were not obtained. There was sole source justification; however, it was written by the vendor. The Tribal Council approved the purchase, but the resolution didn?t mention the vendor and/or the need to sole source the purchase. For Indian Self-Determination, in our selected sample of 40 expenditures, we noted an expenditure of $7,772 that did not have the required three written bids, an expenditure for $15,331 that did not have the required governor?s signature, and an expenditure that was approved for $365 but was later revised to $640 without any additional approvals. Questioned Costs: None. Context: 4 of 81 transactions tested across these two programs were missing documentation required by the Office?s procurement policy. Cause: The Office?s policies and procedures were not always being enforced or being followed. Additionally, the Office?s procurement policy requires sole source documentation for certain expenditures and contracts where the bidding process is bypassed, but the Office has not developed such a form. Effect: The Office was not in compliance with procurement standards and made payments during the year that were in violation of their policy. Auditors? Recommendation: We recommend the Office adhere to the procurement policy that it has developed, and we recommend a sole source form be generated that conforms to the requirements of the procurement policy. Management?s Response: For Head Start ? The Office?s procurement policy allows for sole source procurement if Tribal Council specifically authorizes its use. For the Head Start expenditure of $208,932, Tribal Council Resolution 08-2021-36 specifically approved this expenditure. The Office?s procurement policy does reference a sole source form. However, a sole source form was never created when the procurement policy was approved by Tribal Council. Therefore, a memo justifying the sole source procurement was accepted as sufficient documentation and justification of the sole source procurement. Because this was a sole source procurement, three written bids were not required. Also, legal review is not required for this expenditure because it is a purchase of goods. Legal review is only required for purchase of services above a certain threshold. The Office is in the process of updating its procurement policy and will create a sole source justification form in connection with the update. For Indian Self-Determination ? The Office acknowledges the lack of three written bids for a $7,772 expenditure. Only one written quote was obtained for this purchase. The Office also acknowledges the lack of Governor?s signature on a $15,331 purchase requisition. A new Administrative Assistant issued this purchase requisition and was not properly trained on obtaining Governor?s signature for all purchase requisitions greater than $5,000. It should be noted that Governor signed the check related to this expenditure so was able to see the purchase at that time. The Office also acknowledges a revision was not made to a $365 purchase requisition when an additional purchase was added to the approved purchase requisition.
Federal Programs Information: Funding Agency: Department of Health and Human Services Title: Head Start Assistance Listing Number: 93.600 Award Period: September 1, 2021 ? August 31, 2022, September 1, 2022 ? August 31, 2023 Funding Agency: Department of Health and Human Services Title: Indian Self-Determination Assistance Listing Number: 93.441 Award Period: January 1, 2022 ? December 31, 2024 Criteria: The Office?s policies and procedures contains various requirements, including policies requiring certain levels of administrative and legal review, obtaining one or more written bids at various dollar thresholds, and requiring different levels of approval based on dollar values. Uniform Guidance regulations section CFR 200.318(a) and CFR 200.320(a) state, the non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable State, local, and tribal laws and regulations, provided that the procurement conform to applicable Federal law and the standards identified. Condition: For Head Start, in our selected sample of 41 expenditures, we noted an expenditure of $208,932 that required either a sole source form or three written bids, and a legal review per the Office?s policy. These forms were not obtained. There was sole source justification; however, it was written by the vendor. The Tribal Council approved the purchase, but the resolution didn?t mention the vendor and/or the need to sole source the purchase. For Indian Self-Determination, in our selected sample of 40 expenditures, we noted an expenditure of $7,772 that did not have the required three written bids, an expenditure for $15,331 that did not have the required governor?s signature, and an expenditure that was approved for $365 but was later revised to $640 without any additional approvals. Questioned Costs: None. Context: 4 of 81 transactions tested across these two programs were missing documentation required by the Office?s procurement policy. Cause: The Office?s policies and procedures were not always being enforced or being followed. Additionally, the Office?s procurement policy requires sole source documentation for certain expenditures and contracts where the bidding process is bypassed, but the Office has not developed such a form. Effect: The Office was not in compliance with procurement standards and made payments during the year that were in violation of their policy. Auditors? Recommendation: We recommend the Office adhere to the procurement policy that it has developed, and we recommend a sole source form be generated that conforms to the requirements of the procurement policy. Management?s Response: For Head Start ? The Office?s procurement policy allows for sole source procurement if Tribal Council specifically authorizes its use. For the Head Start expenditure of $208,932, Tribal Council Resolution 08-2021-36 specifically approved this expenditure. The Office?s procurement policy does reference a sole source form. However, a sole source form was never created when the procurement policy was approved by Tribal Council. Therefore, a memo justifying the sole source procurement was accepted as sufficient documentation and justification of the sole source procurement. Because this was a sole source procurement, three written bids were not required. Also, legal review is not required for this expenditure because it is a purchase of goods. Legal review is only required for purchase of services above a certain threshold. The Office is in the process of updating its procurement policy and will create a sole source justification form in connection with the update. For Indian Self-Determination ? The Office acknowledges the lack of three written bids for a $7,772 expenditure. Only one written quote was obtained for this purchase. The Office also acknowledges the lack of Governor?s signature on a $15,331 purchase requisition. A new Administrative Assistant issued this purchase requisition and was not properly trained on obtaining Governor?s signature for all purchase requisitions greater than $5,000. It should be noted that Governor signed the check related to this expenditure so was able to see the purchase at that time. The Office also acknowledges a revision was not made to a $365 purchase requisition when an additional purchase was added to the approved purchase requisition.
Federal Programs Information: Funding Agency: Department of Health and Human Services Title: Head Start Assistance Listing Number: 93.600 Award Period: September 1, 2021 ? August 31, 2022, September 1, 2022 ? August 31, 2023 Funding Agency: Department of Health and Human Services Title: Indian Self-Determination Assistance Listing Number: 93.441 Award Period: January 1, 2022 ? December 31, 2024 Criteria: The Office?s policies and procedures contains various requirements, including policies requiring certain levels of administrative and legal review, obtaining one or more written bids at various dollar thresholds, and requiring different levels of approval based on dollar values. Uniform Guidance regulations section CFR 200.318(a) and CFR 200.320(a) state, the non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable State, local, and tribal laws and regulations, provided that the procurement conform to applicable Federal law and the standards identified. Condition: For Head Start, in our selected sample of 41 expenditures, we noted an expenditure of $208,932 that required either a sole source form or three written bids, and a legal review per the Office?s policy. These forms were not obtained. There was sole source justification; however, it was written by the vendor. The Tribal Council approved the purchase, but the resolution didn?t mention the vendor and/or the need to sole source the purchase. For Indian Self-Determination, in our selected sample of 40 expenditures, we noted an expenditure of $7,772 that did not have the required three written bids, an expenditure for $15,331 that did not have the required governor?s signature, and an expenditure that was approved for $365 but was later revised to $640 without any additional approvals. Questioned Costs: None. Context: 4 of 81 transactions tested across these two programs were missing documentation required by the Office?s procurement policy. Cause: The Office?s policies and procedures were not always being enforced or being followed. Additionally, the Office?s procurement policy requires sole source documentation for certain expenditures and contracts where the bidding process is bypassed, but the Office has not developed such a form. Effect: The Office was not in compliance with procurement standards and made payments during the year that were in violation of their policy. Auditors? Recommendation: We recommend the Office adhere to the procurement policy that it has developed, and we recommend a sole source form be generated that conforms to the requirements of the procurement policy. Management?s Response: For Head Start ? The Office?s procurement policy allows for sole source procurement if Tribal Council specifically authorizes its use. For the Head Start expenditure of $208,932, Tribal Council Resolution 08-2021-36 specifically approved this expenditure. The Office?s procurement policy does reference a sole source form. However, a sole source form was never created when the procurement policy was approved by Tribal Council. Therefore, a memo justifying the sole source procurement was accepted as sufficient documentation and justification of the sole source procurement. Because this was a sole source procurement, three written bids were not required. Also, legal review is not required for this expenditure because it is a purchase of goods. Legal review is only required for purchase of services above a certain threshold. The Office is in the process of updating its procurement policy and will create a sole source justification form in connection with the update. For Indian Self-Determination ? The Office acknowledges the lack of three written bids for a $7,772 expenditure. Only one written quote was obtained for this purchase. The Office also acknowledges the lack of Governor?s signature on a $15,331 purchase requisition. A new Administrative Assistant issued this purchase requisition and was not properly trained on obtaining Governor?s signature for all purchase requisitions greater than $5,000. It should be noted that Governor signed the check related to this expenditure so was able to see the purchase at that time. The Office also acknowledges a revision was not made to a $365 purchase requisition when an additional purchase was added to the approved purchase requisition.
Federal Programs Information: Funding Agency: Department of Health and Human Services Title: Head Start Assistance Listing Number: 93.600 Award Period: September 1, 2021 ? August 31, 2022, September 1, 2022 ? August 31, 2023 Funding Agency: Department of Health and Human Services Title: Indian Self-Determination Assistance Listing Number: 93.441 Award Period: January 1, 2022 ? December 31, 2024 Criteria: The Office?s policies and procedures contains various requirements, including policies requiring certain levels of administrative and legal review, obtaining one or more written bids at various dollar thresholds, and requiring different levels of approval based on dollar values. Uniform Guidance regulations section CFR 200.318(a) and CFR 200.320(a) state, the non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable State, local, and tribal laws and regulations, provided that the procurement conform to applicable Federal law and the standards identified. Condition: For Head Start, in our selected sample of 41 expenditures, we noted an expenditure of $208,932 that required either a sole source form or three written bids, and a legal review per the Office?s policy. These forms were not obtained. There was sole source justification; however, it was written by the vendor. The Tribal Council approved the purchase, but the resolution didn?t mention the vendor and/or the need to sole source the purchase. For Indian Self-Determination, in our selected sample of 40 expenditures, we noted an expenditure of $7,772 that did not have the required three written bids, an expenditure for $15,331 that did not have the required governor?s signature, and an expenditure that was approved for $365 but was later revised to $640 without any additional approvals. Questioned Costs: None. Context: 4 of 81 transactions tested across these two programs were missing documentation required by the Office?s procurement policy. Cause: The Office?s policies and procedures were not always being enforced or being followed. Additionally, the Office?s procurement policy requires sole source documentation for certain expenditures and contracts where the bidding process is bypassed, but the Office has not developed such a form. Effect: The Office was not in compliance with procurement standards and made payments during the year that were in violation of their policy. Auditors? Recommendation: We recommend the Office adhere to the procurement policy that it has developed, and we recommend a sole source form be generated that conforms to the requirements of the procurement policy. Management?s Response: For Head Start ? The Office?s procurement policy allows for sole source procurement if Tribal Council specifically authorizes its use. For the Head Start expenditure of $208,932, Tribal Council Resolution 08-2021-36 specifically approved this expenditure. The Office?s procurement policy does reference a sole source form. However, a sole source form was never created when the procurement policy was approved by Tribal Council. Therefore, a memo justifying the sole source procurement was accepted as sufficient documentation and justification of the sole source procurement. Because this was a sole source procurement, three written bids were not required. Also, legal review is not required for this expenditure because it is a purchase of goods. Legal review is only required for purchase of services above a certain threshold. The Office is in the process of updating its procurement policy and will create a sole source justification form in connection with the update. For Indian Self-Determination ? The Office acknowledges the lack of three written bids for a $7,772 expenditure. Only one written quote was obtained for this purchase. The Office also acknowledges the lack of Governor?s signature on a $15,331 purchase requisition. A new Administrative Assistant issued this purchase requisition and was not properly trained on obtaining Governor?s signature for all purchase requisitions greater than $5,000. It should be noted that Governor signed the check related to this expenditure so was able to see the purchase at that time. The Office also acknowledges a revision was not made to a $365 purchase requisition when an additional purchase was added to the approved purchase requisition.
2022-001 Methods of Procurement Federal Agency: United States Department of Treasury Federal Program Name: Coronavirus State and Local Recovery Funds (CSLRF) Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: SLT-8694, 2021 Award Period: March 3, 2021 to December 31, 2025 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Compliance Criteria: 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Award requires compliance with the provisions of federal procurement guidelines. US Code ? 200.320 states that the non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of ? 200.320 and ?? 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. Condition: The County entered into a noncompetitive procurement contract with a vendor under specific circumstances for an emergency procurement. The County did not document the justification or approval of the noncompetitive emergency procurement. The County?s internal procurement policies state that deviations from standard purchasing procedures must be authorized and all such deviations will be documented and all emergency purchases shall be in a report to the Board of County Commissioners at its next regular Commission meeting. Context: One of five procurement contracts tested did not contain appropriate documentation supporting federal procurement requirements. Cause: The County did not follow their procurement policies and procedures to properly document the justification and approval of an emergency procurement transaction that was made using federal funding and requirements for noncompetitive emergency procurements. Effect: By not following federal regulations and the County?s procurement policy, the County could improperly enter into a contract that violates the requirements of CFR ? 200.320. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the County review their policies and procedures to ensure that they are operating in a manner that follows federal procurement requirements and the County?s procurement policy. The creation and use of a standard procurement checklist would assist the County in documenting all requirements for each procurement that is entered into. Views of Responsible Officials: The Finance Department will work with County Management and Board Departments to ensure familiarity and understanding of the County?s procurement policies and procedures. Additionally, the County is working towards the implementation of a financial system which will improve the controls in place to help ensure compliance with procurement requirements. The Finance Department is also working on a financial policies document and will would with County Manager on a review of the County?s procurement policy.
Significant Deficiency 2 CFR ? 2400.101 gives regulatory effect to the Department of Housing and Urban Development for 2 CFR ? 200.302 (b) (6) and (7) which requires the Authority to establish written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with Subpart E - Cost Principles and the terms and conditions of the Federal award and establish written procedures to implement the requirements of ? 305 Payment. Additionally, 2 C.F.R. ? 2400.101 gives regulatory effect to the Department of Housing and Urban Development for 2 C.F.R. ? 200.318(a) which states the non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in ?? 200.317 through 200.327. Although the Authority did have written standard operating procedures requiring purchase orders, they did not have an approved purchase order or contract on file for 2 of the 50 purchases tested. Failure to have proper controls in place to ensure policies and procedures are being followed could result in unallowable costs and procurement noncompliance. The Authority should follow their written standard operating procedures and implement controls to ensure allowability of costs and procurement in accordance with federal grants.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Federal Program Title: Public and Indian Housing Assistance Listing Number: 14.850 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: LA003, 2022 Award Period: 10/1/21-9/30/22 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance, Other Matters Criteria or Specific Requirement: Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors? performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). Under the micropurchase method, the aggregate dollar amount does not exceed $10,000 ($2,000 in the case of acquisition for construction subject to the Wage Rate Requirements (Davis-Bacon Act)). Small purchase procedures are used for purchases that exceed the micro-purchase amount but do not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold ($250,000). Micropurchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive quotations if the non-federal entity considers the price to be reasonable (2 CFR section 200.320(a)). If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources (2 CFR section 200.320(b)). 3. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). 4. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(b)). 5. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, ?Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.? When a non-federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the nonfederal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. This verification may be accomplished by (1) checking the System for Award Management (SAM) Exclusions maintained by the General Services Administration (GSA) and available at SAM.gov Home (click on Search Record, then click on Advanced Search Exclusions) (Note: The OMB guidance at 2 CFR Part 180 and agency implementing regulations still refer to the SAM Exclusions as the Excluded Parties List System (EPLS)), (2) collecting a certification from the entity, or (3) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that entity (2 CFR section 180.300). Condition: During testing, it was noted that the Authority did not have adequate internal controls over procurement and suspension and debarment requirements. Questioned Costs: $135,749 Context: During testing of a sample of 7 contracts, it was noted that 7 contracts did not comply with compliance requirements. The sample was a statistically valid sample. ? For 2 contracts tested, the Authority was unable to provide a copy of the contract, or documentation to support the contract was properly procured. ? For 3 contracts tested, the Authority was unable to provide documentation to support that a cost analysis was performed prior to entering the contract. ? For all 7 contracts tested, the Authority was unable to provide documentation that it ensured the vendor was not suspended or debarred before entering into the contract. Cause: The Authority failed to maintain proper documentation of contracts and procurement procedures to evidence compliance. Effect: The Authority is not in compliance with federal regulations regarding procurement of contracts, which could lead to vendors receiving funds that are not properly vetted. Recommendation: We recommend that the Authority reviews it?s procurement policy and active contracts and future contracts to ensure that all policies and procedures regarding procurement of contracts are properly followed and documented. Views of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Criteria: 2 CFR Part 200 in general and 2 CFR section 200.332 require non-Federal entities to establish and maintain effective internal controls over Federal awards, including the requirements for allowable costs, cost principles, reporting, and suspension and debarment. The related compliance requirements are set in 2 CFR Part 200 sections 200.514(c), 200.212, 200.318(h), 180.300 and subpart E; 48 CFR section 52.209-6; 31 CFR section 19.300; sections 602 and 603 of the Social Security Act as added by section 9901 of the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021, Pub. L. No. 117-2 as codified at 42 USC 802 and 803 and 31 CFR Part 35, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition: Controls related to calculation and reporting of lost revenue were not effective and the amount calculated as base year revenue was incorrectly reported. Controls related to reporting of other grant expenditures were not effective and certain amounts were missing from the financial reports. Controls related to ensuring contractors were not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded pursuant to 31 CFR section 19.300 were not documented in a manner that is reperformable. Cause: Base year calculation of revenue was performed using interim financial information and was not reconciled to final audited reports. Base year calculation of revenue was not clearly documented. Subsequent year revenue calculations were performed by a consultant who was not engaged to review the base year calculation. Controls over such calculations were not effective. Review of financial reports was not sufficient to ensure all grant expenditures were reported. Suspension and debarment controls were not evidenced with clear documentation; checklists are maintained but were not completed in all cases. Effect: Calculation of lost revenue was incorrectly reported. Expenditures related to the provision of government services related to such lost revenue did not exceed the actual lost revenue. Certain other grant expenditures were erroneously excluded from the financial reports. Procurement of contractors risks including those who were suspended or debarred; however none such were identified. Recommendation: We recommend that the City ensure that all controls for grants be documented in written procedures which should include the name or title of the positions responsible for each control (preparation, review, reconciliation, etc.) and that the performance of the controls be documented in a clear, reperformable manner including the name and date of each responsible individual and which specific control they performed over compliance for the grant.
Federal Agency: U.S. Small Business Administration Federal Program: 59.075 Shuttered Venue Operators Program Grant Period: Year ended September 30, 2022 Criteria: 2 CFR 200.302(b)(7), 2 CFR 200.318(c)(1) Condition: Written policies and procedures for the determination of allowable of costs, conflicts of interest, and procedures for procurement transactions surrounding federal awards were not available. Cause: Unfamiliarity with requirements stated in 2 CFR 200 of the Uniform Guidance. Potential Effect: Instances of noncompliance with direct and material compliance requirements may occur. Repeat Finding: No Management?s Response and Planned Corrective Action: In the event of receipt of future Federal Awards, management and the board of directors will work towards developing a Federal Award Policy and Procedure Manual to be used for federal awards management. Responsible Person: Tim Stephens, Executive Director
Information on the Federal Program: Program Name: Congressional Appropriations Program Federal Agency: United States Department of Treasury AL Number/Name: 21.U01 NeighborWorks? System Program FY 2022 Appropriation 21.U04 COVID-19 American Rescue Plan Criteria: According to 2 CFR ? 200.318(a), General Procurement Standards, the non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State and local laws and regulations, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in the Uniform Guidance. In addition, 2 CFR ?200.318(i) states that the non-federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of the procurement. These records are required to include, but are not necessarily limited to the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. All procurement transactions must be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition consistent with ?200.319 and must be performed using the appropriate procurement method as outlined in ?200.320. Furthermore, 2 CFR ?200.320(c), Noncompetitive Procurement, states that there are specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. Noncompetitive procurement can only be awarded if one or more of the following circumstances apply: (1) The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold; (2) The item is available only from a single source; (3) The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from publicizing a competitive solicitation; (4) The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity expressly authorizes a noncompetitive procurement in response to a written request from the non-Federal entity; or (5) After solicitation of a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate. Condition: During our review of the Corporation?s procurement policies, we noted that the Corporation?s written internal procurement policies and procedures are not in conformity with the requirements identified in the Uniform Guidance procurement requirements. During our testing of the procurement, suspension and debarment compliance requirement, we selected 54 procurement samples for testing. We noted that 12 out of the 54 procurement samples were procured by way of a noncompetitive proposal process through a solicitation from only one source under the criteria of either: (1) the item is available only from a single source or (2) there is an urgent and compelling need for the goods or services. However, based on our review of the 12 procurement files, we noted that all of the 12 procurement files do not appropriately justify the use of a noncompetitive procurement process due to the following reasons: 1. The supplies or services being procured are sold or provided by other vendors, not just by a single source. 2. Incumbency of the vendor is not a valid noncompetitive procurement justification. 3. Contracting without providing for full and open competition shall not be justified on the basis of (1) lack of advance planning by the requiring activity; or (2) concerns related to the amount of funds available for the acquisition of supplies or services. Cause: The Corporation?s personnel did not adhere to the federal requirements and the Corporation?s internal procurement policies and procedures particularly on the use of noncompetitive procurements. Effect: Failure to perform procurement procedures in accordance with the Corporation?s documented policies and the procurement procedures under the Uniform Guidance procurement requirements could result in expenditures incurred being disallowed. Questioned Costs: Not determinable. Context: This is a condition identified per review of the Corporation?s compliance with the specified requirements using a non-statistical sample. The total federal expenditures related to the 12 noncompetitive procurements is $2,786,980 for the year ended September 30, 2022. The total contract value of the 12 noncompetitive procurements is $13,507,008 with contract terms that ranges from 3 to 5 years. The total federal expenditures for all of the 54 procurement samples selected for testing is $9,409,871 from a total population of expenditures subject to procurement of $15,481,554 for the year ended September 30, 2022. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the Corporation update its current procurement policies and procedures to conform with the requirements identified in the Uniform Guidance procurement requirements. In addition, the Corporation should ensure that the use of the Noncompetitive Procurement criteria under the Uniform Guidance procurement requirements are adhered to and appropriate justifications for these contracts are used and documented appropriately. Finally, the Corporation should have a system in place to track and monitor the terms of vendor contracts in order to plan in advance if the contracts will need to be subject to a competitive procurement process providing full and open competition as required. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding and recommendations set forth within and has developed a corrective action plan to address the instances of noncompliance identified and lapses in prescribed internal controls.
Information on the Federal Program: Program Name: Congressional Appropriations Program Federal Agency: United States Department of Treasury AL Number/Name: 21.U01 NeighborWorks? System Program FY 2022 Appropriation 21.U04 COVID-19 American Rescue Plan Criteria: According to 2 CFR ? 200.318(a), General Procurement Standards, the non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State and local laws and regulations, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in the Uniform Guidance. In addition, 2 CFR ?200.318(i) states that the non-federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of the procurement. These records are required to include, but are not necessarily limited to the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. All procurement transactions must be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition consistent with ?200.319 and must be performed using the appropriate procurement method as outlined in ?200.320. Furthermore, 2 CFR ?200.320(c), Noncompetitive Procurement, states that there are specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. Noncompetitive procurement can only be awarded if one or more of the following circumstances apply: (1) The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold; (2) The item is available only from a single source; (3) The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from publicizing a competitive solicitation; (4) The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity expressly authorizes a noncompetitive procurement in response to a written request from the non-Federal entity; or (5) After solicitation of a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate. Condition: During our review of the Corporation?s procurement policies, we noted that the Corporation?s written internal procurement policies and procedures are not in conformity with the requirements identified in the Uniform Guidance procurement requirements. During our testing of the procurement, suspension and debarment compliance requirement, we selected 54 procurement samples for testing. We noted that 12 out of the 54 procurement samples were procured by way of a noncompetitive proposal process through a solicitation from only one source under the criteria of either: (1) the item is available only from a single source or (2) there is an urgent and compelling need for the goods or services. However, based on our review of the 12 procurement files, we noted that all of the 12 procurement files do not appropriately justify the use of a noncompetitive procurement process due to the following reasons: 1. The supplies or services being procured are sold or provided by other vendors, not just by a single source. 2. Incumbency of the vendor is not a valid noncompetitive procurement justification. 3. Contracting without providing for full and open competition shall not be justified on the basis of (1) lack of advance planning by the requiring activity; or (2) concerns related to the amount of funds available for the acquisition of supplies or services. Cause: The Corporation?s personnel did not adhere to the federal requirements and the Corporation?s internal procurement policies and procedures particularly on the use of noncompetitive procurements. Effect: Failure to perform procurement procedures in accordance with the Corporation?s documented policies and the procurement procedures under the Uniform Guidance procurement requirements could result in expenditures incurred being disallowed. Questioned Costs: Not determinable. Context: This is a condition identified per review of the Corporation?s compliance with the specified requirements using a non-statistical sample. The total federal expenditures related to the 12 noncompetitive procurements is $2,786,980 for the year ended September 30, 2022. The total contract value of the 12 noncompetitive procurements is $13,507,008 with contract terms that ranges from 3 to 5 years. The total federal expenditures for all of the 54 procurement samples selected for testing is $9,409,871 from a total population of expenditures subject to procurement of $15,481,554 for the year ended September 30, 2022. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the Corporation update its current procurement policies and procedures to conform with the requirements identified in the Uniform Guidance procurement requirements. In addition, the Corporation should ensure that the use of the Noncompetitive Procurement criteria under the Uniform Guidance procurement requirements are adhered to and appropriate justifications for these contracts are used and documented appropriately. Finally, the Corporation should have a system in place to track and monitor the terms of vendor contracts in order to plan in advance if the contracts will need to be subject to a competitive procurement process providing full and open competition as required. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding and recommendations set forth within and has developed a corrective action plan to address the instances of noncompliance identified and lapses in prescribed internal controls.
Section III ? Federal Award Findings Finding 2022-002 Lack of Internal Control Over Procurement Federal Agency: U.S. Department of the Treasury Federal Programs: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds ALN: 21.027 Award Numbers: SLFRP2526 and SLFRP4713 Award Years: 2021 Type of Finding: Significant deficiency in internal control and noncompliance. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR sections 200.318 to 200.325, procurement policies must be in place to ensure the Tribe is promoting full and open competition consistent with the standards of these sections. In order to ensure objective contractor performance and eliminate unfair competitive advantage, contractors that develop or draft specifications, requirements, statements of work, or invitations for bids or requests for proposals must be excluded from competing for such procurements. Condition and Context: Management could not provide adequate procurement documentation for the purchase of a large piece of equipment. During our testing of allowable costs charged to the program we noted one transaction out of twenty-nine tested that lacked adequate supporting documentation related to procurement. Cause: Lack of internal controls over procurement. Effect: Failure to follow compliance requirements could result in loss of federal funding or questioned costs being incurred. Questioned Costs: None noted. The price for the piece of equipment did not seem unreasonable; however, we were unable to determine if the Tribe received the lowest price possible due to lack of procurement documentation. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that management establish a procurement policy and ensure that the policy is followed for all large purchases. Management?s Response: Management concurs with this finding. See corrective action plan.
Section III ? Federal Award Findings Finding 2022-002 Lack of Internal Control Over Procurement Federal Agency: U.S. Department of the Treasury Federal Programs: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds ALN: 21.027 Award Numbers: SLFRP2526 and SLFRP4713 Award Years: 2021 Type of Finding: Significant deficiency in internal control and noncompliance. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR sections 200.318 to 200.325, procurement policies must be in place to ensure the Tribe is promoting full and open competition consistent with the standards of these sections. In order to ensure objective contractor performance and eliminate unfair competitive advantage, contractors that develop or draft specifications, requirements, statements of work, or invitations for bids or requests for proposals must be excluded from competing for such procurements. Condition and Context: Management could not provide adequate procurement documentation for the purchase of a large piece of equipment. During our testing of allowable costs charged to the program we noted one transaction out of twenty-nine tested that lacked adequate supporting documentation related to procurement. Cause: Lack of internal controls over procurement. Effect: Failure to follow compliance requirements could result in loss of federal funding or questioned costs being incurred. Questioned Costs: None noted. The price for the piece of equipment did not seem unreasonable; however, we were unable to determine if the Tribe received the lowest price possible due to lack of procurement documentation. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that management establish a procurement policy and ensure that the policy is followed for all large purchases. Management?s Response: Management concurs with this finding. See corrective action plan.
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 2022-001 Title III Aging Cluster: Title III B Supportive Services CFDA 93.044 Title III C Nutrition Services CFDA 93.045 Title III C Nutrition Services Incentive CFDA 93.053 Grant period ? year ended September 30, 2023 Condition: The Organization did not have a written procurement policy to properly implement all the requirements of 2 CFR Section 200.318 through 200.326 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR Section 200.319(c), non-federal entities must have written procedures for procurement transactions. Such policy should incorporate all requirements within 2 CFR 200.318 through 200.326 of the Uniform Guidance. Cause: The Organization?s procurement policy does not incorporate all the requirements of 2 CFR Section 200.318 through 200.326 of the Uniform Guidance. Effect: An important component of internal controls is the existence of operating policies and procedures and that they are clearly understood and communicated. Without clear written policies and procedures, there is a higher risk of noncompliance with program compliance requirements. Recommendation: Management should continue to develop comprehensive written policies and procedures to administer all federal programs. Current written policies should be evaluated for inclusion of and compliance with Uniform Guidance requirements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and will adopt written policies to comply with Uniform Guidance requirements.
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 2022-001 Title III Aging Cluster: Title III B Supportive Services CFDA 93.044 Title III C Nutrition Services CFDA 93.045 Title III C Nutrition Services Incentive CFDA 93.053 Grant period ? year ended September 30, 2023 Condition: The Organization did not have a written procurement policy to properly implement all the requirements of 2 CFR Section 200.318 through 200.326 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR Section 200.319(c), non-federal entities must have written procedures for procurement transactions. Such policy should incorporate all requirements within 2 CFR 200.318 through 200.326 of the Uniform Guidance. Cause: The Organization?s procurement policy does not incorporate all the requirements of 2 CFR Section 200.318 through 200.326 of the Uniform Guidance. Effect: An important component of internal controls is the existence of operating policies and procedures and that they are clearly understood and communicated. Without clear written policies and procedures, there is a higher risk of noncompliance with program compliance requirements. Recommendation: Management should continue to develop comprehensive written policies and procedures to administer all federal programs. Current written policies should be evaluated for inclusion of and compliance with Uniform Guidance requirements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and will adopt written policies to comply with Uniform Guidance requirements.
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 2022-001 Title III Aging Cluster: Title III B Supportive Services CFDA 93.044 Title III C Nutrition Services CFDA 93.045 Title III C Nutrition Services Incentive CFDA 93.053 Grant period ? year ended September 30, 2023 Condition: The Organization did not have a written procurement policy to properly implement all the requirements of 2 CFR Section 200.318 through 200.326 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR Section 200.319(c), non-federal entities must have written procedures for procurement transactions. Such policy should incorporate all requirements within 2 CFR 200.318 through 200.326 of the Uniform Guidance. Cause: The Organization?s procurement policy does not incorporate all the requirements of 2 CFR Section 200.318 through 200.326 of the Uniform Guidance. Effect: An important component of internal controls is the existence of operating policies and procedures and that they are clearly understood and communicated. Without clear written policies and procedures, there is a higher risk of noncompliance with program compliance requirements. Recommendation: Management should continue to develop comprehensive written policies and procedures to administer all federal programs. Current written policies should be evaluated for inclusion of and compliance with Uniform Guidance requirements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and will adopt written policies to comply with Uniform Guidance requirements.
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 2022-001 Title III Aging Cluster: Title III B Supportive Services CFDA 93.044 Title III C Nutrition Services CFDA 93.045 Title III C Nutrition Services Incentive CFDA 93.053 Grant period ? year ended September 30, 2023 Condition: The Organization did not have a written procurement policy to properly implement all the requirements of 2 CFR Section 200.318 through 200.326 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR Section 200.319(c), non-federal entities must have written procedures for procurement transactions. Such policy should incorporate all requirements within 2 CFR 200.318 through 200.326 of the Uniform Guidance. Cause: The Organization?s procurement policy does not incorporate all the requirements of 2 CFR Section 200.318 through 200.326 of the Uniform Guidance. Effect: An important component of internal controls is the existence of operating policies and procedures and that they are clearly understood and communicated. Without clear written policies and procedures, there is a higher risk of noncompliance with program compliance requirements. Recommendation: Management should continue to develop comprehensive written policies and procedures to administer all federal programs. Current written policies should be evaluated for inclusion of and compliance with Uniform Guidance requirements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and will adopt written policies to comply with Uniform Guidance requirements.
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 2022-001 Title III Aging Cluster: Title III B Supportive Services CFDA 93.044 Title III C Nutrition Services CFDA 93.045 Title III C Nutrition Services Incentive CFDA 93.053 Grant period ? year ended September 30, 2023 Condition: The Organization did not have a written procurement policy to properly implement all the requirements of 2 CFR Section 200.318 through 200.326 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR Section 200.319(c), non-federal entities must have written procedures for procurement transactions. Such policy should incorporate all requirements within 2 CFR 200.318 through 200.326 of the Uniform Guidance. Cause: The Organization?s procurement policy does not incorporate all the requirements of 2 CFR Section 200.318 through 200.326 of the Uniform Guidance. Effect: An important component of internal controls is the existence of operating policies and procedures and that they are clearly understood and communicated. Without clear written policies and procedures, there is a higher risk of noncompliance with program compliance requirements. Recommendation: Management should continue to develop comprehensive written policies and procedures to administer all federal programs. Current written policies should be evaluated for inclusion of and compliance with Uniform Guidance requirements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and will adopt written policies to comply with Uniform Guidance requirements.
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 2022-001 Title III Aging Cluster: Title III B Supportive Services CFDA 93.044 Title III C Nutrition Services CFDA 93.045 Title III C Nutrition Services Incentive CFDA 93.053 Grant period ? year ended September 30, 2023 Condition: The Organization did not have a written procurement policy to properly implement all the requirements of 2 CFR Section 200.318 through 200.326 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR Section 200.319(c), non-federal entities must have written procedures for procurement transactions. Such policy should incorporate all requirements within 2 CFR 200.318 through 200.326 of the Uniform Guidance. Cause: The Organization?s procurement policy does not incorporate all the requirements of 2 CFR Section 200.318 through 200.326 of the Uniform Guidance. Effect: An important component of internal controls is the existence of operating policies and procedures and that they are clearly understood and communicated. Without clear written policies and procedures, there is a higher risk of noncompliance with program compliance requirements. Recommendation: Management should continue to develop comprehensive written policies and procedures to administer all federal programs. Current written policies should be evaluated for inclusion of and compliance with Uniform Guidance requirements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and will adopt written policies to comply with Uniform Guidance requirements.
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 2022-001 Title III Aging Cluster: Title III B Supportive Services CFDA 93.044 Title III C Nutrition Services CFDA 93.045 Title III C Nutrition Services Incentive CFDA 93.053 Grant period ? year ended September 30, 2023 Condition: The Organization did not have a written procurement policy to properly implement all the requirements of 2 CFR Section 200.318 through 200.326 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR Section 200.319(c), non-federal entities must have written procedures for procurement transactions. Such policy should incorporate all requirements within 2 CFR 200.318 through 200.326 of the Uniform Guidance. Cause: The Organization?s procurement policy does not incorporate all the requirements of 2 CFR Section 200.318 through 200.326 of the Uniform Guidance. Effect: An important component of internal controls is the existence of operating policies and procedures and that they are clearly understood and communicated. Without clear written policies and procedures, there is a higher risk of noncompliance with program compliance requirements. Recommendation: Management should continue to develop comprehensive written policies and procedures to administer all federal programs. Current written policies should be evaluated for inclusion of and compliance with Uniform Guidance requirements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and will adopt written policies to comply with Uniform Guidance requirements.
2022-002?Procurement Federal program information: Funding agency: All Title: All ALN: All Award year and number: All Pass-through entity (if applicable): All Criteria: Non-federal entities other than states must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. According to BRINM?s Purchasing SOP?s, project purchase requests exceeding a value of $25,000 require obtaining three bids. Purchase orders are created for approved project purchase requests and reviewed and signed by the Executive Director or Assistant Director before it can be issued to a vendor. Condition: During fiscal year 2022, BRINM paid a vendor $93,808 for services related to a project. There is no evidence that three bids were obtained for selection of this vendor. Additionally, there was not an approved purchase order for one of the three invoices paid to this vendor. Questioned Costs: None Context: One of 25 nonpayroll transactions tested. Additionally, one of four vendors/subawards tested that were paid over $25,000 during fiscal year 2022. Cause: BRINM?s Grants Manager, who was responsible for all records related to purchasing, accounts payable, and credit cards, resigned in November 2021 without filing many documents. Evidence of bids obtained for use of this vendor could not be located. Effect: Procurement of vendors does not comply with BRINM SOP?s and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. Auditor?s Recommendations: BRINM should implement its approved SOP?s as referenced above to ensure that purchasing SOP?s are implemented and selection of vendors is adequately documented. Management?s Response: Current Management is not able to confirm nor deny that appropriate documentation was not collected prior to payment but highly doubts that it was not collected based on the reliability of the previous Grants Manager. Management notes that the vendor was specifically mentioned in the Grant submission. Management will ensure that purchasing SOP are implemented and selection of vendors is adequately documented. Management has secured a project management software that will retain project documentation. This should ensure appropriate documentation is collected and available to all Management for the life of the project, until date of destruction.
2022-002?Procurement Federal program information: Funding agency: All Title: All ALN: All Award year and number: All Pass-through entity (if applicable): All Criteria: Non-federal entities other than states must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. According to BRINM?s Purchasing SOP?s, project purchase requests exceeding a value of $25,000 require obtaining three bids. Purchase orders are created for approved project purchase requests and reviewed and signed by the Executive Director or Assistant Director before it can be issued to a vendor. Condition: During fiscal year 2022, BRINM paid a vendor $93,808 for services related to a project. There is no evidence that three bids were obtained for selection of this vendor. Additionally, there was not an approved purchase order for one of the three invoices paid to this vendor. Questioned Costs: None Context: One of 25 nonpayroll transactions tested. Additionally, one of four vendors/subawards tested that were paid over $25,000 during fiscal year 2022. Cause: BRINM?s Grants Manager, who was responsible for all records related to purchasing, accounts payable, and credit cards, resigned in November 2021 without filing many documents. Evidence of bids obtained for use of this vendor could not be located. Effect: Procurement of vendors does not comply with BRINM SOP?s and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. Auditor?s Recommendations: BRINM should implement its approved SOP?s as referenced above to ensure that purchasing SOP?s are implemented and selection of vendors is adequately documented. Management?s Response: Current Management is not able to confirm nor deny that appropriate documentation was not collected prior to payment but highly doubts that it was not collected based on the reliability of the previous Grants Manager. Management notes that the vendor was specifically mentioned in the Grant submission. Management will ensure that purchasing SOP are implemented and selection of vendors is adequately documented. Management has secured a project management software that will retain project documentation. This should ensure appropriate documentation is collected and available to all Management for the life of the project, until date of destruction.
2022-002?Procurement Federal program information: Funding agency: All Title: All ALN: All Award year and number: All Pass-through entity (if applicable): All Criteria: Non-federal entities other than states must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. According to BRINM?s Purchasing SOP?s, project purchase requests exceeding a value of $25,000 require obtaining three bids. Purchase orders are created for approved project purchase requests and reviewed and signed by the Executive Director or Assistant Director before it can be issued to a vendor. Condition: During fiscal year 2022, BRINM paid a vendor $93,808 for services related to a project. There is no evidence that three bids were obtained for selection of this vendor. Additionally, there was not an approved purchase order for one of the three invoices paid to this vendor. Questioned Costs: None Context: One of 25 nonpayroll transactions tested. Additionally, one of four vendors/subawards tested that were paid over $25,000 during fiscal year 2022. Cause: BRINM?s Grants Manager, who was responsible for all records related to purchasing, accounts payable, and credit cards, resigned in November 2021 without filing many documents. Evidence of bids obtained for use of this vendor could not be located. Effect: Procurement of vendors does not comply with BRINM SOP?s and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. Auditor?s Recommendations: BRINM should implement its approved SOP?s as referenced above to ensure that purchasing SOP?s are implemented and selection of vendors is adequately documented. Management?s Response: Current Management is not able to confirm nor deny that appropriate documentation was not collected prior to payment but highly doubts that it was not collected based on the reliability of the previous Grants Manager. Management notes that the vendor was specifically mentioned in the Grant submission. Management will ensure that purchasing SOP are implemented and selection of vendors is adequately documented. Management has secured a project management software that will retain project documentation. This should ensure appropriate documentation is collected and available to all Management for the life of the project, until date of destruction.
2022-002?Procurement Federal program information: Funding agency: All Title: All ALN: All Award year and number: All Pass-through entity (if applicable): All Criteria: Non-federal entities other than states must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. According to BRINM?s Purchasing SOP?s, project purchase requests exceeding a value of $25,000 require obtaining three bids. Purchase orders are created for approved project purchase requests and reviewed and signed by the Executive Director or Assistant Director before it can be issued to a vendor. Condition: During fiscal year 2022, BRINM paid a vendor $93,808 for services related to a project. There is no evidence that three bids were obtained for selection of this vendor. Additionally, there was not an approved purchase order for one of the three invoices paid to this vendor. Questioned Costs: None Context: One of 25 nonpayroll transactions tested. Additionally, one of four vendors/subawards tested that were paid over $25,000 during fiscal year 2022. Cause: BRINM?s Grants Manager, who was responsible for all records related to purchasing, accounts payable, and credit cards, resigned in November 2021 without filing many documents. Evidence of bids obtained for use of this vendor could not be located. Effect: Procurement of vendors does not comply with BRINM SOP?s and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. Auditor?s Recommendations: BRINM should implement its approved SOP?s as referenced above to ensure that purchasing SOP?s are implemented and selection of vendors is adequately documented. Management?s Response: Current Management is not able to confirm nor deny that appropriate documentation was not collected prior to payment but highly doubts that it was not collected based on the reliability of the previous Grants Manager. Management notes that the vendor was specifically mentioned in the Grant submission. Management will ensure that purchasing SOP are implemented and selection of vendors is adequately documented. Management has secured a project management software that will retain project documentation. This should ensure appropriate documentation is collected and available to all Management for the life of the project, until date of destruction.
2022-002?Procurement Federal program information: Funding agency: All Title: All ALN: All Award year and number: All Pass-through entity (if applicable): All Criteria: Non-federal entities other than states must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. According to BRINM?s Purchasing SOP?s, project purchase requests exceeding a value of $25,000 require obtaining three bids. Purchase orders are created for approved project purchase requests and reviewed and signed by the Executive Director or Assistant Director before it can be issued to a vendor. Condition: During fiscal year 2022, BRINM paid a vendor $93,808 for services related to a project. There is no evidence that three bids were obtained for selection of this vendor. Additionally, there was not an approved purchase order for one of the three invoices paid to this vendor. Questioned Costs: None Context: One of 25 nonpayroll transactions tested. Additionally, one of four vendors/subawards tested that were paid over $25,000 during fiscal year 2022. Cause: BRINM?s Grants Manager, who was responsible for all records related to purchasing, accounts payable, and credit cards, resigned in November 2021 without filing many documents. Evidence of bids obtained for use of this vendor could not be located. Effect: Procurement of vendors does not comply with BRINM SOP?s and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. Auditor?s Recommendations: BRINM should implement its approved SOP?s as referenced above to ensure that purchasing SOP?s are implemented and selection of vendors is adequately documented. Management?s Response: Current Management is not able to confirm nor deny that appropriate documentation was not collected prior to payment but highly doubts that it was not collected based on the reliability of the previous Grants Manager. Management notes that the vendor was specifically mentioned in the Grant submission. Management will ensure that purchasing SOP are implemented and selection of vendors is adequately documented. Management has secured a project management software that will retain project documentation. This should ensure appropriate documentation is collected and available to all Management for the life of the project, until date of destruction.