FINDING 2022-004 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, COVID-19 - School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, COVID-19 - National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children, COVID-19 - Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 2021, FY 2022 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 27 SCOTT COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 2 SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2020-012. Condition and Context An effective system of internal controls was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Procurement Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000. However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold of $150,000 or less for when small purchase procedures may be used. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. The School Corporation did not have internal controls in place to ensure the purchasing method used complied with federal and state requirements. The School Corporation did not obtain price or rate quotes for two vendors tested that were less than the simplified acquisition threshold of $150,000, but exceeded the $10,000 micro-purchase threshold. The micropurchase threshold may be increased, but the School Corporation did not provide documentation that the threshold had been increased. The School Corporation did not obtain a contract for these two vendors as required by Indiana Code for purchases between $50,000 and $150,000. Additionally, documentation detailing the history of procurement, which must include the reason for the procurement method used, was not available for audit for both purchases made using the small purchases and micro-purchases procurement methods. Suspension and Debarment There were no internal controls in place to ensure that vendors were not suspended or debarred from participation in federal programs. The School Corporation did not perform any procedures to verify that vendors paid with federal grant monies were not suspended or debarred from participation in federal programs before entering into a covered transaction. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 28 SCOTT COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 2 SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318 states in part: "(a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in ?? 200.317 through 200.327. . . . (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. . . ." 2 CFR 200.320 (Uniform Guidance) states in part: "The non-Federal Entity must use one of the following methods of procurement. . . . (b) Procurement by small purchase procedures. Small purchase procedures are those relatively simple and informal procurement methods for securing services, supplies, or other property that do not cost more than the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. . . ." 2 CFR 200.320 (Revised Uniform Guidance) states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use document procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and ?? 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the Simplified Acquisition Threshold (SAT), as defined in ? 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases - (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 29 SCOTT COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 2 SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause Management had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Effect The failure to establish an effective system of internal controls enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure compliance and comply with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Federal Program Title: COVID-19 Education Stabilization Fund ? Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund - Institutional Portion (Assistance Listing No. 84.425F)Grant Award Period: July 1, 2021 through June 30, 2022 Grant Identification Numbers: P425F203954 ? 20A Compliance Requirement: Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Criteria: 2 CFR 200.318(a) requires the non-Federal entity to have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity?s documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in 2 CFR 200.317 through 200.327. 2 CFR 200.214 states that non-Federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implemented at 2 CFR 180.300. 2 CFR 180.300 specifies that before entering into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, the entity must verify that the counterparty with whom they intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Effective internal controls should include procedures to ensure compliance with procurement, suspension and debarment standards. Conditions Found: During the audit, it was identified that the College did not have a procurement policy in order to comply with 2 CFR 200.318(a). As a result of the lack of a policy, expenditures were made that were not in compliance with the procurement requirements of 2 CFR 200.317 through 2 CFR 200.327. Additionally, it was identified that the College did not obtain evidence that the expenditures made during the period were in compliance with the suspension and debarment requirements of 2 CFR 200.214 and 2 CFR 180.300. Further, it was identified that the College did not have effective internal controls over procurement, suspension and debarment in accordance with 2 CFR 200.303. Total expenditures for 84.425F that were subject to procurement, suspension and debarment compliance requirements were $847,652. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Questioned Costs: Not determinable Repeat Finding: This finding is a repeat finding in the immediately prior audit. In the prior year, this was reported as finding 2021-001. Cause and Effect: The College did not perform procedures to evidence that the transactions entered into were with counterparties which met the requirements of 2 CFR 200.214 and 2 CFR 180.300. The College did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure the procurement, suspension and debarment compliance requirements in 2 CFR 200.317 through 200.327 and 2 CFR 200.214 and 2 CFR 180.300. The College does not typically expend federal awards that are subject to the Uniform Guidance procurement requirements, and as such, management did not have policies in place prior to receiving these federal awards to comply with procurement, suspension and debarment compliance requirements. In response to the prior year finding, management is in process of implementing procurement policies to meet the requirements of 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.327. Recommendation: We recommend the College enhance its internal control to ensure that the College has a policy and effective internal controls in place to ensure that the College conforms to required federal procurement, suspension and debarment procedures. View of Responsible Officials: We concur with the finding and are in the process of finalizing policies and procedures to comply with procurement, suspension and debarment standards. Beginning in April 2022, in response to the prior year finding, the College began to ensure vendors were not suspended and debarred for all HEERF funds, including reviewing prior vendors with which HEERF funds were expended. Further, management began obtaining quotes for certain purchases that are being reimbursed by HEERF funds. Consistent with our corrective action plan, we implemented formal written policies and procedures during fiscal year 2023.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Federal Program Name: Rural eConnectivity Pilot Program Assistance Listing Number: 10.752 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: MD 1701-A64, 2020 Award Period: July 1, 2020 ? July 1, 2025 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria or specific requirement: Per 2CFR ? 200.318(a), non-Federal entities must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in ?? 200.317 through 200.327. Questioned Costs: None Condition/Context: The Commission?s procurement policy for federal expenditures is not in accordance with ?? 200.317 through 200.327. Cause/Effect: The Commission does not have sufficient documented policies and procedures over procurement to ensure federal procurement requirements are met. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend the Commission establish and document procurement policies and procedures in conformity with the Federal requirements ?? 200.317 through 200.327. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding.
Child Nutrition Cluster ?School Nutrition Program ? Assistance Listing #10.555 and Summer Food Service Program ? Assistance Listing #10.559 2022-005 ? Significant Deficiency in Controls over Compliance and Compliance Finding: Administrative Requirements of Uniform Guidance ? Administrative Policies This is a repeat of prior year finding 2021-006 Conditions and Criteria: Written policies associated with financial management, allowable costs, cash management, procurement and compensation are in need of adoption and enhancement to meet the administrative requirements of Uniform Guidance (2 CFR 200). Cause/Context: The Catholic Secondary Schools of the Diocese of Grand Rapids have limited written policies and procedures that are applicable to federal awards and address the direct and material compliance matters important to the major federal program. In addition, there are unique policy requirements of Uniform Guidance related to financial management, allowable costs, cash management and procurement that are relevant to the Schools? federal programs. Recommendations: The Catholic Secondary Schools of the Diocese of Grand Rapids should adopt the following written policies and updates: ? Financial Management (2 CFR 200.302) The financial management policy should include records documenting compliance, and the tracking of funds to determine that expenditures are in accordance with the terms and conditions of the federal awards. The financial management and reporting system must provide the following: ? Identification - Title of the award, CFDA number ? Complete disclosure of accurate and current financial results of each federal award ? Source and application of funds for federal award activity ? Record retention and access ? define the time period for which records must be kept (can vary by grant agreement), and who has the ability access the records (?200.333 - ?200.337) ? Written procedure to implement cash management requirements (see below) ? Written procedures for determining the allowability of costs (see below) ? Cash Management (2 CFR 200.305) A written policy is required by Uniform Guidance detailing the Schools? procedures to minimize the time that elapses between draw and expenditure of federal dollars. ? Allowable Costs (2 CFR 200.302(b)(7)) The Schools must have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with Subpart E - Cost Principles of Uniform Guidance and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. This includes the determination of allowable costs and the review of this determination. The standard assumes policies and procedures are in place for disbursements, and the allowable cost policy will demonstrate how the Schools ensure compliance. The criteria for costs to be considered allowable are documented within 2 CFR 200.403. ? Procurement Standards (2 CFR 200.317 ? 200.326) The Schools must have a written policy that promotes full and open vendor competition, conflict of interest policies should cover employees as well as the organization, and general purchase requirements with specific thresholds as set forth by the Uniform Guidance. There are five allowable procurement methods as described in ?200.320. ? Policy Guide (2 CFR 200.400) In summary, the Schools must have written policies that document the efficient and effective administration of federal awards through sound management practices. The Schools have the primary responsibility for employing whatever form of sound organization and management techniques may be necessary to assure proper and efficient administration of the federal awards. The accounting practices must be consistent with Uniform Guidance cost principles, support the accumulation of costs as required, and must provide for adequate documentation to support costs charged to the federal award. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Child Nutrition Cluster ?School Nutrition Program ? Assistance Listing #10.555 and Summer Food Service Program ? Assistance Listing #10.559 2022-005 ? Significant Deficiency in Controls over Compliance and Compliance Finding: Administrative Requirements of Uniform Guidance ? Administrative Policies This is also a compliance finding, not just controls - UPDATED This is a repeat of prior year finding 2021-006 Conditions and Criteria: Written policies associated with financial management, allowable costs, cash management, procurement and compensation are in need of adoption and enhancement to meet the administrative requirements of Uniform Guidance (2 CFR 200). Cause/Context: The Catholic Secondary Schools of the Diocese of Grand Rapids have limited written policies and procedures that are applicable to federal awards and address the direct and material compliance matters important to the major federal program. In addition, there are unique policy requirements of Uniform Guidance related to financial management, allowable costs, cash management and procurement that are relevant to the Schools? federal programs. Recommendations: The Catholic Secondary Schools of the Diocese of Grand Rapids should adopt the following written policies and updates: ? Financial Management (2 CFR 200.302) The financial management policy should include records documenting compliance, and the tracking of funds to determine that expenditures are in accordance with the terms and conditions of the federal awards. The financial management and reporting system must provide the following: ? Identification - Title of the award, CFDA number ? Complete disclosure of accurate and current financial results of each federal award ? Source and application of funds for federal award activity ? Record retention and access ? define the time period for which records must be kept (can vary by grant agreement), and who has the ability access the records (?200.333 - ?200.337) ? Written procedure to implement cash management requirements (see below) ? Written procedures for determining the allowability of costs (see below) ? Cash Management (2 CFR 200.305) A written policy is required by Uniform Guidance detailing the Schools? procedures to minimize the time that elapses between draw and expenditure of federal dollars. ? Allowable Costs (2 CFR 200.302(b)(7)) The Schools must have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with Subpart E - Cost Principles of Uniform Guidance and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. This includes the determination of allowable costs and the review of this determination. The standard assumes policies and procedures are in place for disbursements, and the allowable cost policy will demonstrate how the Schools ensure compliance. The criteria for costs to be considered allowable are documented within 2 CFR 200.403. ? Procurement Standards (2 CFR 200.317 ? 200.326) The Schools must have a written policy that promotes full and open vendor competition, conflict of interest policies should cover employees as well as the organization, and general purchase requirements with specific thresholds as set forth by the Uniform Guidance. There are five allowable procurement methods as described in ?200.320. ? Policy Guide (2 CFR 200.400) In summary, the Schools must have written policies that document the efficient and effective administration of federal awards through sound management practices. The Schools have the primary responsibility for employing whatever form of sound organization and management techniques may be necessary to assure proper and efficient administration of the federal awards. The accounting practices must be consistent with Uniform Guidance cost principles, support the accumulation of costs as required, and must provide for adequate documentation to support costs charged to the federal award. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: We concur with the findings of the auditors. We have developed a plan to address the findings, and are actively working to implement that plan. The corrective action plan is attached to this report.
Child Nutrition Cluster ?School Nutrition Program ? Assistance Listing #10.555 and Summer Food Service Program ? Assistance Listing #10.559 2022-005 ? Significant Deficiency in Controls over Compliance and Compliance Finding: Administrative Requirements of Uniform Guidance ? Administrative Policies This is a repeat of prior year finding 2021-006 Conditions and Criteria: Written policies associated with financial management, allowable costs, cash management, procurement and compensation are in need of adoption and enhancement to meet the administrative requirements of Uniform Guidance (2 CFR 200). Cause/Context: The Catholic Secondary Schools of the Diocese of Grand Rapids have limited written policies and procedures that are applicable to federal awards and address the direct and material compliance matters important to the major federal program. In addition, there are unique policy requirements of Uniform Guidance related to financial management, allowable costs, cash management and procurement that are relevant to the Schools? federal programs. Recommendations: The Catholic Secondary Schools of the Diocese of Grand Rapids should adopt the following written policies and updates: ? Financial Management (2 CFR 200.302) The financial management policy should include records documenting compliance, and the tracking of funds to determine that expenditures are in accordance with the terms and conditions of the federal awards. The financial management and reporting system must provide the following: ? Identification - Title of the award, CFDA number ? Complete disclosure of accurate and current financial results of each federal award ? Source and application of funds for federal award activity ? Record retention and access ? define the time period for which records must be kept (can vary by grant agreement), and who has the ability access the records (?200.333 - ?200.337) ? Written procedure to implement cash management requirements (see below) ? Written procedures for determining the allowability of costs (see below) ? Cash Management (2 CFR 200.305) A written policy is required by Uniform Guidance detailing the Schools? procedures to minimize the time that elapses between draw and expenditure of federal dollars. ? Allowable Costs (2 CFR 200.302(b)(7)) The Schools must have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with Subpart E - Cost Principles of Uniform Guidance and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. This includes the determination of allowable costs and the review of this determination. The standard assumes policies and procedures are in place for disbursements, and the allowable cost policy will demonstrate how the Schools ensure compliance. The criteria for costs to be considered allowable are documented within 2 CFR 200.403. ? Procurement Standards (2 CFR 200.317 ? 200.326) The Schools must have a written policy that promotes full and open vendor competition, conflict of interest policies should cover employees as well as the organization, and general purchase requirements with specific thresholds as set forth by the Uniform Guidance. There are five allowable procurement methods as described in ?200.320. ? Policy Guide (2 CFR 200.400) In summary, the Schools must have written policies that document the efficient and effective administration of federal awards through sound management practices. The Schools have the primary responsibility for employing whatever form of sound organization and management techniques may be necessary to assure proper and efficient administration of the federal awards. The accounting practices must be consistent with Uniform Guidance cost principles, support the accumulation of costs as required, and must provide for adequate documentation to support costs charged to the federal award. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Child Nutrition Cluster ?School Nutrition Program ? Assistance Listing #10.555 and Summer Food Service Program ? Assistance Listing #10.559 2022-005 ? Significant Deficiency in Controls over Compliance and Compliance Finding: Administrative Requirements of Uniform Guidance ? Administrative Policies This is also a compliance finding, not just controls - UPDATED This is a repeat of prior year finding 2021-006 Conditions and Criteria: Written policies associated with financial management, allowable costs, cash management, procurement and compensation are in need of adoption and enhancement to meet the administrative requirements of Uniform Guidance (2 CFR 200). Cause/Context: The Catholic Secondary Schools of the Diocese of Grand Rapids have limited written policies and procedures that are applicable to federal awards and address the direct and material compliance matters important to the major federal program. In addition, there are unique policy requirements of Uniform Guidance related to financial management, allowable costs, cash management and procurement that are relevant to the Schools? federal programs. Recommendations: The Catholic Secondary Schools of the Diocese of Grand Rapids should adopt the following written policies and updates: ? Financial Management (2 CFR 200.302) The financial management policy should include records documenting compliance, and the tracking of funds to determine that expenditures are in accordance with the terms and conditions of the federal awards. The financial management and reporting system must provide the following: ? Identification - Title of the award, CFDA number ? Complete disclosure of accurate and current financial results of each federal award ? Source and application of funds for federal award activity ? Record retention and access ? define the time period for which records must be kept (can vary by grant agreement), and who has the ability access the records (?200.333 - ?200.337) ? Written procedure to implement cash management requirements (see below) ? Written procedures for determining the allowability of costs (see below) ? Cash Management (2 CFR 200.305) A written policy is required by Uniform Guidance detailing the Schools? procedures to minimize the time that elapses between draw and expenditure of federal dollars. ? Allowable Costs (2 CFR 200.302(b)(7)) The Schools must have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with Subpart E - Cost Principles of Uniform Guidance and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. This includes the determination of allowable costs and the review of this determination. The standard assumes policies and procedures are in place for disbursements, and the allowable cost policy will demonstrate how the Schools ensure compliance. The criteria for costs to be considered allowable are documented within 2 CFR 200.403. ? Procurement Standards (2 CFR 200.317 ? 200.326) The Schools must have a written policy that promotes full and open vendor competition, conflict of interest policies should cover employees as well as the organization, and general purchase requirements with specific thresholds as set forth by the Uniform Guidance. There are five allowable procurement methods as described in ?200.320. ? Policy Guide (2 CFR 200.400) In summary, the Schools must have written policies that document the efficient and effective administration of federal awards through sound management practices. The Schools have the primary responsibility for employing whatever form of sound organization and management techniques may be necessary to assure proper and efficient administration of the federal awards. The accounting practices must be consistent with Uniform Guidance cost principles, support the accumulation of costs as required, and must provide for adequate documentation to support costs charged to the federal award. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: We concur with the findings of the auditors. We have developed a plan to address the findings, and are actively working to implement that plan. The corrective action plan is attached to this report.
FINDING 2022-002 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Special Education Grants to States Assistance Listings Number: 84.027 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 21611-034-PN01, 22611-034-PN01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2021-003. Condition and Context The School Corporation had not designed or implemented adequate policies or procedures to ensure that proper procurement procedures for small purchases and simplified acquisitions were followed. There was no documented oversight, review, or approval process in place at the School Corporation to ensure proper procedures were followed and price or rate quotations were obtained, or documentation to support limited procurement procedures were conducted and maintained. Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000 unless a lower, more restrictive threshold is set by a non-federal entity. As Indiana Code has set a more restrictive threshold of $150,000, informal procurement methods are permitted when the value of the procurement does not exceed $150,000. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micropurchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 22 METROPOLITAN SCHOOL DISTRICT OF LAWRENCE TOWNSHIP SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) The School Corporation did not obtain price or rate quotes for the five vendors tested that were less than the simplified acquisition threshold of $150,000 but exceeded the $10,000 micro-purchase threshold. Documentation detailing the history of procurement, which must include the reason for the procurement method used, was not available for audit. The School Corporation also did not follow procurement requirements for contracted services which exceeded the simplified acquisition threshold of $150,000. The School Corporation did not correctly procure a contract for the one vendor that exceeded the simplified acquisition threshold. Additionally, the School Corporation did not adequately maintain documentation detailing the history of the procurement or the rationale to limit competition. Finally, the School Corporation did not verify that this vendor was not excluded or disqualified from participation in federal assistance programs or activities. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318 states in part: "(a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. . . . (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. . . ." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 23 METROPOLITAN SCHOOL DISTRICT OF LAWRENCE TOWNSHIP SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases — (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. (ii) Simplified acquisition thresholds. The non-Federal entity is responsible for determining an appropriate simplified acquisition threshold based on internal controls, an evaluation of risk and its documented procurement procedures which must not exceed the threshold established in the FAR. When applicable, a lower simplified acquisition threshold used by the non-Federal entity must be authorized or not prohibited under State, local, or tribal laws or regulations. (b) Formal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal financial assistance award exceeds the SAT, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require following documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a non-competitive procurement can be used in accordance with § 200.319 or paragraph (c) of this section. The following formal methods of procurement are used for procurement of property or services above the simplified acquisition threshold or a value below the simplified acquisition threshold the non-Federal entity determines to be appropriate: (1) Sealed bids. A procurement method in which bids are publicly solicited and a firm fixed-price contract (lump sum or unit price) is awarded to the responsible bidder whose bid, conforming with all the material terms and conditions of the invitation for bids, is the lowest in price. The sealed bids method is the preferred method for procuring construction, if the conditions. (i) In order for sealed bidding to be feasible, the following conditions should be present: (A) A complete, adequate, and realistic specification or purchase description is available; (B) Two or more responsible bidders are willing and able to compete effectively for the business; and (C) The procurement lends itself to a firm fixed price contract and the selection of the successful bidder can be made principally on the basis of price. (ii) If sealed bids are used, the following requirements apply: INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 24 METROPOLITAN SCHOOL DISTRICT OF LAWRENCE TOWNSHIP SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (A) Bids must be solicited from an adequate number of qualified sources, providing them sufficient response time prior to the date set for opening the bids, for local, and tribal governments, the invitation for bids must be publicly advertised; (B) The invitation for bids, which will include any specifications and pertinent attachments, must define the items or services in order for the bidder to properly respond; (C) All bids will be opened at the time and place prescribed in the invitation for bids, and for local and tribal governments, the bids must be opened publicly; (D) A firm fixed price contract award will be made in writing to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder. Where specified in bidding documents, factors such as discounts, transportation cost, and life cycle costs must be considered in determining which bid is lowest. Payment discounts will only be used to determine the low bid when prior experience indicates that such discounts are usually taken advantage of; and. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation, which would include segregation of key functions. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, procurement procedures for goods and services were not adhered to and vendors to whom payments equal to or in excess of $25,000 were not verified to be not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 25 METROPOLITAN SCHOOL DISTRICT OF LAWRENCE TOWNSHIP SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure there are appropriate procurement procedures for goods and services and contractors and subrecipients, as appropriate, are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded prior to entering into any contracts or subawards. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
2022-004 - Procurement, Suspension & Debarment Federal Program Information: ALN - 10.760 - Water and Waste Disposal Systems for Rural Communities Criteria: The following CFR(s) apply to this finding: 2 CFR 200.317-200.326. Condition: During audit procedures, it was identified that the Town did not have a procurement policy in place. Cause: The Town needs to adopt a procurement policy to comply with Uniform Guidance. Effect: Procurements might not conform to applicable Federal laws. Identification of Questioned Costs: None identified. Context: The entire population. Repeat Finding: This is a repeat finding of 2021-004. Recommendation: It is recommended that the Town adopt a procurement policy that follows the Uniform Guidance and that the Town implement internal control processes and procedures to ensure that the adopted policy is followed. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan: Client agrees with finding, and a version of their response can be found in the Corrective Action Plan. Please see the Corrective Action Plan issued by the Town of Livermore Falls.
Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and DebarmentFederal Agency: Department of AgricultureFederal Programs: School Breakfast Program, COVID-19 - School Breakfast Program, National SchoolLunch Program, COVID-19 - National School Lunch Program, Summer FoodService Program, COVID-19 - Summer Food Service Program for ChildrenAssistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY21, FY22Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of EducationCompliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and DebarmentAudit Findings: Material Weakness, Other MattersRepeat FindingThis is a repeat finding for suspension and debarment from the immediately prior report. The prioraudit finding number was 2020-004.INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS23BLACKFORD COUNTY SCHOOLSSCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS(Continued)Condition and ContextAn effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensurecompliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension andDebarment compliance requirement.Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement forproperty or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000.However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold of $150,000 or less for when small purchaseprocedures may be used. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. Theinformal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for thosepurchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micropurchasethreshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awardedwithout soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price orrate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources.The School Corporation did not obtain price or rate quotes for six vendors tested that were lessthan the simplified acquisition threshold of $150,000 but exceeded the $10,000 micro-purchase threshold.The micro-purchase threshold may be increased, but the School Corporation did not provide documentationthat the threshold had been increased.The School Corporation engaged with an Education Service Center that was not an approvedSchool Food Authority (SFA) cooperative. Since the Education Service Center failed to meet therequirements to be an approved SFA cooperative, the obligation reverted to the School Corporation. TheSchool Corporation did not obtain price or rate quotes for purchases of milk, exceeding $10,000 from anadequate number of sources, which fell under the small purchase procedures. In addition, the SchoolCorporation did not verify the milk vendor with a contract over $25,000 was not excluded or disqualifiedfrom participation in federal award programs.The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period.Criteria2 CFR 200.303 states in part:"The non-Federal entity must:(a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that providesreasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award incompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federalaward. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards forInternal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of theUnited States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee ofSponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ."2 CFR 200.318(i) states:"The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement.These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for themethod of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and thebasis for the contract price."INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS24BLACKFORD COUNTY SCHOOLSSCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS(Continued)2 CFR 200.320(b) (Uniform Guidance) states:"Procurement by small purchase procedures. Small purchase procedures are those relativelysimple and informal procurement methods for securing services, supplies, or other propertythat do not cost more than the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. If small purchase proceduresare used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualifiedsources."2 CFR 200.320 (Revised Uniform Guidance) states in part:"The non-Federal entity must have and use document procurement procedures, consistent withthe standards of this section and ?? 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the followingmethods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under aFederal award or sub-award.(a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property orservices under a Federal award does not exceed the Simplified Acquisition Threshold(SAT), as defined in ? 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity,formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informalprocurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize theassociated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurementof property or services at or below the SAT include: . . .(2) Small purchases ?(i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, theaggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold butdoes not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase proceduresare used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number ofqualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ."Indiana Code 5-22-8-3 states:"(a) This section applies only if the purchasing agent expects the purchase to be:(1) at least fifty thousand dollars ($50,000); and(2) not more than one hundred fifty thousand dollars ($150,000). . . ."CauseManagement had not established a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliancewith the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement.EffectThe failure to establish an effective system of internal controls enabled noncompliance to go undetected.Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarmentcompliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation.INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS25BLACKFORD COUNTY SCHOOLSSCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS(Continued)Questioned CostsThere were no questioned costs identified.RecommendationWe recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controlsto ensure compliance and comply with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension andDebarment compliance requirement.Views of Responsible OfficialsFor the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and DebarmentFederal Agency: Department of AgricultureFederal Programs: School Breakfast Program, COVID-19 - School Breakfast Program, National SchoolLunch Program, COVID-19 - National School Lunch Program, Summer FoodService Program, COVID-19 - Summer Food Service Program for ChildrenAssistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY21, FY22Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of EducationCompliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and DebarmentAudit Findings: Material Weakness, Other MattersRepeat FindingThis is a repeat finding for suspension and debarment from the immediately prior report. The prioraudit finding number was 2020-004.INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS23BLACKFORD COUNTY SCHOOLSSCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS(Continued)Condition and ContextAn effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensurecompliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension andDebarment compliance requirement.Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement forproperty or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000.However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold of $150,000 or less for when small purchaseprocedures may be used. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. Theinformal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for thosepurchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micropurchasethreshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awardedwithout soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price orrate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources.The School Corporation did not obtain price or rate quotes for six vendors tested that were lessthan the simplified acquisition threshold of $150,000 but exceeded the $10,000 micro-purchase threshold.The micro-purchase threshold may be increased, but the School Corporation did not provide documentationthat the threshold had been increased.The School Corporation engaged with an Education Service Center that was not an approvedSchool Food Authority (SFA) cooperative. Since the Education Service Center failed to meet therequirements to be an approved SFA cooperative, the obligation reverted to the School Corporation. TheSchool Corporation did not obtain price or rate quotes for purchases of milk, exceeding $10,000 from anadequate number of sources, which fell under the small purchase procedures. In addition, the SchoolCorporation did not verify the milk vendor with a contract over $25,000 was not excluded or disqualifiedfrom participation in federal award programs.The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period.Criteria2 CFR 200.303 states in part:"The non-Federal entity must:(a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that providesreasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award incompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federalaward. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards forInternal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of theUnited States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee ofSponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ."2 CFR 200.318(i) states:"The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement.These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for themethod of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and thebasis for the contract price."INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS24BLACKFORD COUNTY SCHOOLSSCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS(Continued)2 CFR 200.320(b) (Uniform Guidance) states:"Procurement by small purchase procedures. Small purchase procedures are those relativelysimple and informal procurement methods for securing services, supplies, or other propertythat do not cost more than the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. If small purchase proceduresare used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualifiedsources."2 CFR 200.320 (Revised Uniform Guidance) states in part:"The non-Federal entity must have and use document procurement procedures, consistent withthe standards of this section and ?? 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the followingmethods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under aFederal award or sub-award.(a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property orservices under a Federal award does not exceed the Simplified Acquisition Threshold(SAT), as defined in ? 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity,formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informalprocurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize theassociated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurementof property or services at or below the SAT include: . . .(2) Small purchases ?(i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, theaggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold butdoes not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase proceduresare used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number ofqualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ."Indiana Code 5-22-8-3 states:"(a) This section applies only if the purchasing agent expects the purchase to be:(1) at least fifty thousand dollars ($50,000); and(2) not more than one hundred fifty thousand dollars ($150,000). . . ."CauseManagement had not established a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliancewith the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement.EffectThe failure to establish an effective system of internal controls enabled noncompliance to go undetected.Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarmentcompliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation.INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS25BLACKFORD COUNTY SCHOOLSSCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS(Continued)Questioned CostsThere were no questioned costs identified.RecommendationWe recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controlsto ensure compliance and comply with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension andDebarment compliance requirement.Views of Responsible OfficialsFor the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and DebarmentFederal Agency: Department of AgricultureFederal Programs: School Breakfast Program, COVID-19 - School Breakfast Program, National SchoolLunch Program, COVID-19 - National School Lunch Program, Summer FoodService Program, COVID-19 - Summer Food Service Program for ChildrenAssistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY21, FY22Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of EducationCompliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and DebarmentAudit Findings: Material Weakness, Other MattersRepeat FindingThis is a repeat finding for suspension and debarment from the immediately prior report. The prioraudit finding number was 2020-004.INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS23BLACKFORD COUNTY SCHOOLSSCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS(Continued)Condition and ContextAn effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensurecompliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension andDebarment compliance requirement.Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement forproperty or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000.However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold of $150,000 or less for when small purchaseprocedures may be used. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. Theinformal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for thosepurchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micropurchasethreshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awardedwithout soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price orrate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources.The School Corporation did not obtain price or rate quotes for six vendors tested that were lessthan the simplified acquisition threshold of $150,000 but exceeded the $10,000 micro-purchase threshold.The micro-purchase threshold may be increased, but the School Corporation did not provide documentationthat the threshold had been increased.The School Corporation engaged with an Education Service Center that was not an approvedSchool Food Authority (SFA) cooperative. Since the Education Service Center failed to meet therequirements to be an approved SFA cooperative, the obligation reverted to the School Corporation. TheSchool Corporation did not obtain price or rate quotes for purchases of milk, exceeding $10,000 from anadequate number of sources, which fell under the small purchase procedures. In addition, the SchoolCorporation did not verify the milk vendor with a contract over $25,000 was not excluded or disqualifiedfrom participation in federal award programs.The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period.Criteria2 CFR 200.303 states in part:"The non-Federal entity must:(a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that providesreasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award incompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federalaward. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards forInternal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of theUnited States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee ofSponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ."2 CFR 200.318(i) states:"The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement.These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for themethod of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and thebasis for the contract price."INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS24BLACKFORD COUNTY SCHOOLSSCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS(Continued)2 CFR 200.320(b) (Uniform Guidance) states:"Procurement by small purchase procedures. Small purchase procedures are those relativelysimple and informal procurement methods for securing services, supplies, or other propertythat do not cost more than the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. If small purchase proceduresare used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualifiedsources."2 CFR 200.320 (Revised Uniform Guidance) states in part:"The non-Federal entity must have and use document procurement procedures, consistent withthe standards of this section and ?? 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the followingmethods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under aFederal award or sub-award.(a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property orservices under a Federal award does not exceed the Simplified Acquisition Threshold(SAT), as defined in ? 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity,formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informalprocurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize theassociated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurementof property or services at or below the SAT include: . . .(2) Small purchases ?(i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, theaggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold butdoes not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase proceduresare used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number ofqualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ."Indiana Code 5-22-8-3 states:"(a) This section applies only if the purchasing agent expects the purchase to be:(1) at least fifty thousand dollars ($50,000); and(2) not more than one hundred fifty thousand dollars ($150,000). . . ."CauseManagement had not established a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliancewith the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement.EffectThe failure to establish an effective system of internal controls enabled noncompliance to go undetected.Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarmentcompliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation.INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS25BLACKFORD COUNTY SCHOOLSSCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS(Continued)Questioned CostsThere were no questioned costs identified.RecommendationWe recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controlsto ensure compliance and comply with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension andDebarment compliance requirement.Views of Responsible OfficialsFor the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and DebarmentFederal Agency: Department of AgricultureFederal Programs: School Breakfast Program, COVID-19 - School Breakfast Program, National SchoolLunch Program, COVID-19 - National School Lunch Program, Summer FoodService Program, COVID-19 - Summer Food Service Program for ChildrenAssistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY21, FY22Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of EducationCompliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and DebarmentAudit Findings: Material Weakness, Other MattersRepeat FindingThis is a repeat finding for suspension and debarment from the immediately prior report. The prioraudit finding number was 2020-004.INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS23BLACKFORD COUNTY SCHOOLSSCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS(Continued)Condition and ContextAn effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensurecompliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension andDebarment compliance requirement.Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement forproperty or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000.However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold of $150,000 or less for when small purchaseprocedures may be used. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. Theinformal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for thosepurchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micropurchasethreshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awardedwithout soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price orrate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources.The School Corporation did not obtain price or rate quotes for six vendors tested that were lessthan the simplified acquisition threshold of $150,000 but exceeded the $10,000 micro-purchase threshold.The micro-purchase threshold may be increased, but the School Corporation did not provide documentationthat the threshold had been increased.The School Corporation engaged with an Education Service Center that was not an approvedSchool Food Authority (SFA) cooperative. Since the Education Service Center failed to meet therequirements to be an approved SFA cooperative, the obligation reverted to the School Corporation. TheSchool Corporation did not obtain price or rate quotes for purchases of milk, exceeding $10,000 from anadequate number of sources, which fell under the small purchase procedures. In addition, the SchoolCorporation did not verify the milk vendor with a contract over $25,000 was not excluded or disqualifiedfrom participation in federal award programs.The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period.Criteria2 CFR 200.303 states in part:"The non-Federal entity must:(a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that providesreasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award incompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federalaward. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards forInternal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of theUnited States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee ofSponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ."2 CFR 200.318(i) states:"The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement.These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for themethod of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and thebasis for the contract price."INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS24BLACKFORD COUNTY SCHOOLSSCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS(Continued)2 CFR 200.320(b) (Uniform Guidance) states:"Procurement by small purchase procedures. Small purchase procedures are those relativelysimple and informal procurement methods for securing services, supplies, or other propertythat do not cost more than the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. If small purchase proceduresare used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualifiedsources."2 CFR 200.320 (Revised Uniform Guidance) states in part:"The non-Federal entity must have and use document procurement procedures, consistent withthe standards of this section and ?? 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the followingmethods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under aFederal award or sub-award.(a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property orservices under a Federal award does not exceed the Simplified Acquisition Threshold(SAT), as defined in ? 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity,formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informalprocurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize theassociated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurementof property or services at or below the SAT include: . . .(2) Small purchases ?(i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, theaggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold butdoes not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase proceduresare used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number ofqualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ."Indiana Code 5-22-8-3 states:"(a) This section applies only if the purchasing agent expects the purchase to be:(1) at least fifty thousand dollars ($50,000); and(2) not more than one hundred fifty thousand dollars ($150,000). . . ."CauseManagement had not established a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliancewith the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement.EffectThe failure to establish an effective system of internal controls enabled noncompliance to go undetected.Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarmentcompliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation.INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS25BLACKFORD COUNTY SCHOOLSSCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS(Continued)Questioned CostsThere were no questioned costs identified.RecommendationWe recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controlsto ensure compliance and comply with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension andDebarment compliance requirement.Views of Responsible OfficialsFor the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and DebarmentFederal Agency: Department of AgricultureFederal Programs: School Breakfast Program, COVID-19 - School Breakfast Program, National SchoolLunch Program, COVID-19 - National School Lunch Program, Summer FoodService Program, COVID-19 - Summer Food Service Program for ChildrenAssistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY21, FY22Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of EducationCompliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and DebarmentAudit Findings: Material Weakness, Other MattersRepeat FindingThis is a repeat finding for suspension and debarment from the immediately prior report. The prioraudit finding number was 2020-004.INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS23BLACKFORD COUNTY SCHOOLSSCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS(Continued)Condition and ContextAn effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensurecompliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension andDebarment compliance requirement.Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement forproperty or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000.However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold of $150,000 or less for when small purchaseprocedures may be used. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. Theinformal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for thosepurchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micropurchasethreshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awardedwithout soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price orrate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources.The School Corporation did not obtain price or rate quotes for six vendors tested that were lessthan the simplified acquisition threshold of $150,000 but exceeded the $10,000 micro-purchase threshold.The micro-purchase threshold may be increased, but the School Corporation did not provide documentationthat the threshold had been increased.The School Corporation engaged with an Education Service Center that was not an approvedSchool Food Authority (SFA) cooperative. Since the Education Service Center failed to meet therequirements to be an approved SFA cooperative, the obligation reverted to the School Corporation. TheSchool Corporation did not obtain price or rate quotes for purchases of milk, exceeding $10,000 from anadequate number of sources, which fell under the small purchase procedures. In addition, the SchoolCorporation did not verify the milk vendor with a contract over $25,000 was not excluded or disqualifiedfrom participation in federal award programs.The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period.Criteria2 CFR 200.303 states in part:"The non-Federal entity must:(a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that providesreasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award incompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federalaward. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards forInternal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of theUnited States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee ofSponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ."2 CFR 200.318(i) states:"The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement.These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for themethod of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and thebasis for the contract price."INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS24BLACKFORD COUNTY SCHOOLSSCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS(Continued)2 CFR 200.320(b) (Uniform Guidance) states:"Procurement by small purchase procedures. Small purchase procedures are those relativelysimple and informal procurement methods for securing services, supplies, or other propertythat do not cost more than the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. If small purchase proceduresare used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualifiedsources."2 CFR 200.320 (Revised Uniform Guidance) states in part:"The non-Federal entity must have and use document procurement procedures, consistent withthe standards of this section and ?? 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the followingmethods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under aFederal award or sub-award.(a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property orservices under a Federal award does not exceed the Simplified Acquisition Threshold(SAT), as defined in ? 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity,formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informalprocurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize theassociated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurementof property or services at or below the SAT include: . . .(2) Small purchases ?(i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, theaggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold butdoes not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase proceduresare used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number ofqualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ."Indiana Code 5-22-8-3 states:"(a) This section applies only if the purchasing agent expects the purchase to be:(1) at least fifty thousand dollars ($50,000); and(2) not more than one hundred fifty thousand dollars ($150,000). . . ."CauseManagement had not established a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliancewith the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement.EffectThe failure to establish an effective system of internal controls enabled noncompliance to go undetected.Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarmentcompliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation.INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS25BLACKFORD COUNTY SCHOOLSSCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS(Continued)Questioned CostsThere were no questioned costs identified.RecommendationWe recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controlsto ensure compliance and comply with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension andDebarment compliance requirement.Views of Responsible OfficialsFor the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and DebarmentFederal Agency: Department of AgricultureFederal Programs: School Breakfast Program, COVID-19 - School Breakfast Program, National SchoolLunch Program, COVID-19 - National School Lunch Program, Summer FoodService Program, COVID-19 - Summer Food Service Program for ChildrenAssistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY21, FY22Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of EducationCompliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and DebarmentAudit Findings: Material Weakness, Other MattersRepeat FindingThis is a repeat finding for suspension and debarment from the immediately prior report. The prioraudit finding number was 2020-004.INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS23BLACKFORD COUNTY SCHOOLSSCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS(Continued)Condition and ContextAn effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensurecompliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension andDebarment compliance requirement.Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement forproperty or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000.However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold of $150,000 or less for when small purchaseprocedures may be used. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. Theinformal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for thosepurchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micropurchasethreshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awardedwithout soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price orrate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources.The School Corporation did not obtain price or rate quotes for six vendors tested that were lessthan the simplified acquisition threshold of $150,000 but exceeded the $10,000 micro-purchase threshold.The micro-purchase threshold may be increased, but the School Corporation did not provide documentationthat the threshold had been increased.The School Corporation engaged with an Education Service Center that was not an approvedSchool Food Authority (SFA) cooperative. Since the Education Service Center failed to meet therequirements to be an approved SFA cooperative, the obligation reverted to the School Corporation. TheSchool Corporation did not obtain price or rate quotes for purchases of milk, exceeding $10,000 from anadequate number of sources, which fell under the small purchase procedures. In addition, the SchoolCorporation did not verify the milk vendor with a contract over $25,000 was not excluded or disqualifiedfrom participation in federal award programs.The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period.Criteria2 CFR 200.303 states in part:"The non-Federal entity must:(a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that providesreasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award incompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federalaward. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards forInternal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of theUnited States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee ofSponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ."2 CFR 200.318(i) states:"The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement.These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for themethod of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and thebasis for the contract price."INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS24BLACKFORD COUNTY SCHOOLSSCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS(Continued)2 CFR 200.320(b) (Uniform Guidance) states:"Procurement by small purchase procedures. Small purchase procedures are those relativelysimple and informal procurement methods for securing services, supplies, or other propertythat do not cost more than the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. If small purchase proceduresare used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualifiedsources."2 CFR 200.320 (Revised Uniform Guidance) states in part:"The non-Federal entity must have and use document procurement procedures, consistent withthe standards of this section and ?? 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the followingmethods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under aFederal award or sub-award.(a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property orservices under a Federal award does not exceed the Simplified Acquisition Threshold(SAT), as defined in ? 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity,formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informalprocurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize theassociated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurementof property or services at or below the SAT include: . . .(2) Small purchases ?(i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, theaggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold butdoes not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase proceduresare used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number ofqualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ."Indiana Code 5-22-8-3 states:"(a) This section applies only if the purchasing agent expects the purchase to be:(1) at least fifty thousand dollars ($50,000); and(2) not more than one hundred fifty thousand dollars ($150,000). . . ."CauseManagement had not established a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliancewith the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement.EffectThe failure to establish an effective system of internal controls enabled noncompliance to go undetected.Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarmentcompliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation.INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS25BLACKFORD COUNTY SCHOOLSSCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS(Continued)Questioned CostsThere were no questioned costs identified.RecommendationWe recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controlsto ensure compliance and comply with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension andDebarment compliance requirement.Views of Responsible OfficialsFor the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and DebarmentFederal Agency: Department of AgricultureFederal Programs: School Breakfast Program, COVID-19 - School Breakfast Program, National SchoolLunch Program, COVID-19 - National School Lunch Program, Summer FoodService Program, COVID-19 - Summer Food Service Program for ChildrenAssistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY21, FY22Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of EducationCompliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and DebarmentAudit Findings: Material Weakness, Other MattersRepeat FindingThis is a repeat finding for suspension and debarment from the immediately prior report. The prioraudit finding number was 2020-004.INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS23BLACKFORD COUNTY SCHOOLSSCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS(Continued)Condition and ContextAn effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensurecompliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension andDebarment compliance requirement.Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement forproperty or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000.However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold of $150,000 or less for when small purchaseprocedures may be used. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. Theinformal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for thosepurchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micropurchasethreshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awardedwithout soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price orrate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources.The School Corporation did not obtain price or rate quotes for six vendors tested that were lessthan the simplified acquisition threshold of $150,000 but exceeded the $10,000 micro-purchase threshold.The micro-purchase threshold may be increased, but the School Corporation did not provide documentationthat the threshold had been increased.The School Corporation engaged with an Education Service Center that was not an approvedSchool Food Authority (SFA) cooperative. Since the Education Service Center failed to meet therequirements to be an approved SFA cooperative, the obligation reverted to the School Corporation. TheSchool Corporation did not obtain price or rate quotes for purchases of milk, exceeding $10,000 from anadequate number of sources, which fell under the small purchase procedures. In addition, the SchoolCorporation did not verify the milk vendor with a contract over $25,000 was not excluded or disqualifiedfrom participation in federal award programs.The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period.Criteria2 CFR 200.303 states in part:"The non-Federal entity must:(a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that providesreasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award incompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federalaward. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards forInternal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of theUnited States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee ofSponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ."2 CFR 200.318(i) states:"The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement.These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for themethod of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and thebasis for the contract price."INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS24BLACKFORD COUNTY SCHOOLSSCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS(Continued)2 CFR 200.320(b) (Uniform Guidance) states:"Procurement by small purchase procedures. Small purchase procedures are those relativelysimple and informal procurement methods for securing services, supplies, or other propertythat do not cost more than the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. If small purchase proceduresare used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualifiedsources."2 CFR 200.320 (Revised Uniform Guidance) states in part:"The non-Federal entity must have and use document procurement procedures, consistent withthe standards of this section and ?? 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the followingmethods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under aFederal award or sub-award.(a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property orservices under a Federal award does not exceed the Simplified Acquisition Threshold(SAT), as defined in ? 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity,formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informalprocurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize theassociated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurementof property or services at or below the SAT include: . . .(2) Small purchases ?(i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, theaggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold butdoes not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase proceduresare used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number ofqualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ."Indiana Code 5-22-8-3 states:"(a) This section applies only if the purchasing agent expects the purchase to be:(1) at least fifty thousand dollars ($50,000); and(2) not more than one hundred fifty thousand dollars ($150,000). . . ."CauseManagement had not established a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliancewith the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement.EffectThe failure to establish an effective system of internal controls enabled noncompliance to go undetected.Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarmentcompliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation.INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS25BLACKFORD COUNTY SCHOOLSSCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS(Continued)Questioned CostsThere were no questioned costs identified.RecommendationWe recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controlsto ensure compliance and comply with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension andDebarment compliance requirement.Views of Responsible OfficialsFor the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and DebarmentFederal Agency: Department of AgricultureFederal Programs: School Breakfast Program, COVID-19 - School Breakfast Program, National SchoolLunch Program, COVID-19 - National School Lunch Program, Summer FoodService Program, COVID-19 - Summer Food Service Program for ChildrenAssistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY21, FY22Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of EducationCompliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and DebarmentAudit Findings: Material Weakness, Other MattersRepeat FindingThis is a repeat finding for suspension and debarment from the immediately prior report. The prioraudit finding number was 2020-004.INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS23BLACKFORD COUNTY SCHOOLSSCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS(Continued)Condition and ContextAn effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensurecompliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension andDebarment compliance requirement.Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement forproperty or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000.However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold of $150,000 or less for when small purchaseprocedures may be used. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. Theinformal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for thosepurchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micropurchasethreshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awardedwithout soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price orrate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources.The School Corporation did not obtain price or rate quotes for six vendors tested that were lessthan the simplified acquisition threshold of $150,000 but exceeded the $10,000 micro-purchase threshold.The micro-purchase threshold may be increased, but the School Corporation did not provide documentationthat the threshold had been increased.The School Corporation engaged with an Education Service Center that was not an approvedSchool Food Authority (SFA) cooperative. Since the Education Service Center failed to meet therequirements to be an approved SFA cooperative, the obligation reverted to the School Corporation. TheSchool Corporation did not obtain price or rate quotes for purchases of milk, exceeding $10,000 from anadequate number of sources, which fell under the small purchase procedures. In addition, the SchoolCorporation did not verify the milk vendor with a contract over $25,000 was not excluded or disqualifiedfrom participation in federal award programs.The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period.Criteria2 CFR 200.303 states in part:"The non-Federal entity must:(a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that providesreasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award incompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federalaward. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards forInternal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of theUnited States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee ofSponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ."2 CFR 200.318(i) states:"The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement.These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for themethod of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and thebasis for the contract price."INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS24BLACKFORD COUNTY SCHOOLSSCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS(Continued)2 CFR 200.320(b) (Uniform Guidance) states:"Procurement by small purchase procedures. Small purchase procedures are those relativelysimple and informal procurement methods for securing services, supplies, or other propertythat do not cost more than the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. If small purchase proceduresare used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualifiedsources."2 CFR 200.320 (Revised Uniform Guidance) states in part:"The non-Federal entity must have and use document procurement procedures, consistent withthe standards of this section and ?? 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the followingmethods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under aFederal award or sub-award.(a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property orservices under a Federal award does not exceed the Simplified Acquisition Threshold(SAT), as defined in ? 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity,formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informalprocurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize theassociated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurementof property or services at or below the SAT include: . . .(2) Small purchases ?(i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, theaggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold butdoes not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase proceduresare used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number ofqualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ."Indiana Code 5-22-8-3 states:"(a) This section applies only if the purchasing agent expects the purchase to be:(1) at least fifty thousand dollars ($50,000); and(2) not more than one hundred fifty thousand dollars ($150,000). . . ."CauseManagement had not established a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliancewith the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement.EffectThe failure to establish an effective system of internal controls enabled noncompliance to go undetected.Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarmentcompliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation.INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS25BLACKFORD COUNTY SCHOOLSSCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS(Continued)Questioned CostsThere were no questioned costs identified.RecommendationWe recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controlsto ensure compliance and comply with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension andDebarment compliance requirement.Views of Responsible OfficialsFor the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and DebarmentFederal Agency: Department of AgricultureFederal Programs: School Breakfast Program, COVID-19 - School Breakfast Program, National SchoolLunch Program, COVID-19 - National School Lunch Program, Summer FoodService Program, COVID-19 - Summer Food Service Program for ChildrenAssistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY21, FY22Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of EducationCompliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and DebarmentAudit Findings: Material Weakness, Other MattersRepeat FindingThis is a repeat finding for suspension and debarment from the immediately prior report. The prioraudit finding number was 2020-004.INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS23BLACKFORD COUNTY SCHOOLSSCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS(Continued)Condition and ContextAn effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensurecompliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension andDebarment compliance requirement.Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement forproperty or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000.However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold of $150,000 or less for when small purchaseprocedures may be used. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. Theinformal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for thosepurchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micropurchasethreshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awardedwithout soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price orrate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources.The School Corporation did not obtain price or rate quotes for six vendors tested that were lessthan the simplified acquisition threshold of $150,000 but exceeded the $10,000 micro-purchase threshold.The micro-purchase threshold may be increased, but the School Corporation did not provide documentationthat the threshold had been increased.The School Corporation engaged with an Education Service Center that was not an approvedSchool Food Authority (SFA) cooperative. Since the Education Service Center failed to meet therequirements to be an approved SFA cooperative, the obligation reverted to the School Corporation. TheSchool Corporation did not obtain price or rate quotes for purchases of milk, exceeding $10,000 from anadequate number of sources, which fell under the small purchase procedures. In addition, the SchoolCorporation did not verify the milk vendor with a contract over $25,000 was not excluded or disqualifiedfrom participation in federal award programs.The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period.Criteria2 CFR 200.303 states in part:"The non-Federal entity must:(a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that providesreasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award incompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federalaward. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards forInternal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of theUnited States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee ofSponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ."2 CFR 200.318(i) states:"The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement.These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for themethod of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and thebasis for the contract price."INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS24BLACKFORD COUNTY SCHOOLSSCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS(Continued)2 CFR 200.320(b) (Uniform Guidance) states:"Procurement by small purchase procedures. Small purchase procedures are those relativelysimple and informal procurement methods for securing services, supplies, or other propertythat do not cost more than the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. If small purchase proceduresare used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualifiedsources."2 CFR 200.320 (Revised Uniform Guidance) states in part:"The non-Federal entity must have and use document procurement procedures, consistent withthe standards of this section and ?? 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the followingmethods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under aFederal award or sub-award.(a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property orservices under a Federal award does not exceed the Simplified Acquisition Threshold(SAT), as defined in ? 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity,formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informalprocurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize theassociated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurementof property or services at or below the SAT include: . . .(2) Small purchases ?(i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, theaggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold butdoes not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase proceduresare used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number ofqualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ."Indiana Code 5-22-8-3 states:"(a) This section applies only if the purchasing agent expects the purchase to be:(1) at least fifty thousand dollars ($50,000); and(2) not more than one hundred fifty thousand dollars ($150,000). . . ."CauseManagement had not established a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliancewith the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement.EffectThe failure to establish an effective system of internal controls enabled noncompliance to go undetected.Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarmentcompliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation.INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS25BLACKFORD COUNTY SCHOOLSSCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS(Continued)Questioned CostsThere were no questioned costs identified.RecommendationWe recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controlsto ensure compliance and comply with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension andDebarment compliance requirement.Views of Responsible OfficialsFor the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
Criteria: Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) 200.318 General Procurement Standards requires entities to have documented procurement procedures that conform to the procurement standards identified in 2 CFR 200.317 through 200.327. Condition: The City does not have formal documented procurement policies and procedures related to expenditures of federal awards. Cause: The City Council forms a committee to review and approve disbursements of federal funds. This process is the City’s general practice but does not follow written procurement policies and procedures. Effect: The City is out of compliance with general procurement standards under 2 CFR 200.318. Recommendation: The City should adopt formal documented procurement policies and procedures related to expenditures of federal awards. Response: The City Clerk and Mayor, with help from the Treasurer, will develop and implement documented procurement procedures that conform to the procurement standards relating to Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) 200.317 through 200.327.
Criteria: Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) 200.318 General Procurement Standards requires entities to have documented procurement procedures that conform to the procurement standards identified in 2 CFR 200.317 through 200.327. Condition: The City does not have formal documented procurement policies and procedures related to expenditures of federal awards. Cause: The City Council forms a committee to review and approve disbursements of federal funds. This process is the City’s general practice but does not follow written procurement policies and procedures. Effect: The City is out of compliance with general procurement standards under 2 CFR 200.318. Recommendation: The City should adopt formal documented procurement policies and procedures related to expenditures of federal awards. Response: The City Clerk and Mayor, with help from the Treasurer, will develop and implement documented procurement procedures that conform to the procurement standards relating to Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) 200.317 through 200.327.
Criteria: Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) 200.318 General Procurement Standards requires entities to have documented procurement procedures that conform to the procurement standards identified in 2 CFR 200.317 through 200.327. Condition: The City does not have formal documented procurement policies and procedures related to expenditures of federal awards. Cause: The City Council forms a committee to review and approve disbursements of federal funds. This process is the City’s general practice but does not follow written procurement policies and procedures. Effect: The City is out of compliance with general procurement standards under 2 CFR 200.318. Recommendation: The City should adopt formal documented procurement policies and procedures related to expenditures of federal awards. Response: The City Clerk and Mayor, with help from the Treasurer, will develop and implement documented procurement procedures that conform to the procurement standards relating to Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) 200.317 through 200.327.
2022-003 Procurement Policies and Covered Transactions Compliance Requirement Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment Category Significant Deficiency in Internal Control and Noncompliance Federal Agency U.S. Department of the Treasury Pass-Through Entity Puerto Rico Fiscal Agency and Financial Advisory Authority ALN 21.027 Federal Program COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Criteria 2 CFR section 200.318 General procurement standards. (a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. 2 CFR section 180.220 Are any procurement contracts included as covered transactions? (a) Covered transactions under this part— (1) Do not include any procurement contracts awarded directly by a Federal agency; but (2) Do include some procurement contracts awarded by non-Federal participants in nonprocurement covered transactions. (b) Specifically, a contract for goods or services is a covered transaction if any of the following applies: (1) The contract is awarded by a participant in a nonprocurement transaction that is covered under § 180.210, and the amount of the contract is expected to equal or exceed $25,000. (2) The contract requires the consent of an official of a Federal agency. In that case, the contract, regardless of the amount, always is a covered transaction, and it does not matter who awarded it. For example, it could be a subcontract awarded by a contractor at a tier below a nonprocurement transaction, as shown in the appendix to this part. (3) The contract is for Federally-required audit services. (c) A subcontract also is a covered transaction if,— (1) It is awarded by a participant in a procurement transaction under a nonprocurement transaction of a Federal agency that extends the coverage of paragraph (b)(1) of this section to additional tiers of contracts (see the diagram in the appendix to this part showing that optional lower tier coverage); and (2) The value of the subcontract is expected to equal or exceed $25,000. Condition General Procurement Standards - Written Policies The Corporation has an outdated institutional procurement manual approved in 2014 that lacks written policies to ascertain compliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, or the terms and conditions of federal awards regarding procurement, suspension, and debarment requirements. Suspension and Debarment - Covered Transaction From a population of nineteen disbursements, we selected nine disbursements to ascertain compliance with 2 CFR section 180.220 by examining the procurement documents provided by the Corporation. From that sample, we identified nine instances in which the SAM.gov registration verification process was not performed. Of the nine instances, we found eight suppliers properly registered, but one supplier appears as validated as unique and existing but not registered in SAM.gov. Cause Lack of understanding of procurement compliance requirements for federal awards. Fiscal year 2023 was the first year for the Corporation to be subjected to a single audit compliance requirement for receiving and expending COVID-19 public health emergency programs. Effect Noncompliance with sections 200.318 and 180.220 of 2 CFR may lead to temporary withholding of cash payments until the deficiency is corrected, and/or withholding further federal program awards. Questioned Costs None Recommendation General Procurement Standards - Written Policies and Suspension and Debarment - Covered Transaction We recommend the Corporation update its internal procurement written policies following the provisions of current state statutes and regulations and develop separate procurement written policies following the provisions of federal laws and regulations or the terms and conditions of federal awards, which includes the Procurement Standards described in 2 CFR section 200.317 through 200.327, as applicable. By updating, developing, and implementing the required written procurement policies, the Corporation will be able to comply with the federal government compliance requirements. Views of responsible officials Refer to Corrective Action Plan section.
Material Instance of Non-Compliance and Significant Deficiency Written Procurement Policy This finding impacts the procurement and suspension and debarment compliance requirement for the major program, Assistance Listing Number 10.555, Child Nutrition Cluster, funded by the U.S. Department of Agriculture and passed through by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE). Criteria: The School must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.327. The School also must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200. Condition: During our compliance testing, we reviewed the School's procurement policy against Uniform Guidance standards. The policy did not meet all of the considerations that are required through Uniform Guidance, Federal and state regulations. The School followed their procurement policy during fiscal year 2022, but should update this policy in accordance with these regulations. Cause: The School’s existing procurement policy did not document all of the elements required by the Uniform Guidance. Effect: Non-compliance with the Uniform Guidance, potentially resulting in an increase in questioned costs. Was the finding a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year?: No Recommendation: AAFCPAs recommends that management revise their policy to comply with current standards under the Uniform Guidance. Management Response: During the audit, it was recognized that the School did not have an updated procurement policy to comply with the current standards under the Uniform Guidance. This is the first year that the School received funds that exceeded the Uniform Guidance threshold and was not aware that there was a difference between Federal policy and state policy that we operated under. During the audit, it was recognized that the School had obtained appropriate bids and performed an adequate and documented comparison of qualifications amongst vendors before selecting the current vendor. These practices, which are outlined in the Uniform Guidance Standard, although followed, are not accurately reflected in our current procurement policy. This policy will be updated during fiscal year 2023.
Finding 2022-011 - Noncompliance Over Procurement and Suspension and Debarment – Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds PASS THROUGH GRANTOR: Direct Grant FEDERAL AGENCY: U.S. Department of Treasury ASSISTANCE LISTING: 21.027 FEDERAL PROGRAM NAME: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF) FEDERAL AWARD NUMBER: SLFRP3720 FEDERAL AWARD YEAR: 2022 CONTROL CATEGORY: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment QUESTIONED COSTS: $203,000 Condition: During our review of the disbursement data from Muskogee County regarding procurement and suspension and debarment as per the Uniform Guidance 2 CFR 200.317 through 200.327, we identified the following: • One (1) ambulance was purchased in the amount of $203,000 for the Muskogee County EMS. There were no bids or quotes provide by the County or found in the BOCC meeting minutes supporting expenditure documentation. • There were six (6) vendors, in which the County did not check the www.SAM.gov website to review if the vendor had been suspended or debarred for those disbursements that warranted a bid, on the 6-month bid list, or received quotes. Cause of Condition: Policies and procedures have not been designed and implemented to ensure compliance of expenditures for all federal awards. Effect of Condition: This condition resulted in noncompliance to grant requirements and could lead to a loss of federal funds to the County. Recommendation: OSAI recommends county officials and department heads gain an understanding of federal programs awarded to Muskogee County. Internal control procedures should be designed and implemented to ensure accurate procurement and suspension and debarment and to ensure compliance with federal requirements. Management Response: Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners: Muskogee County has hired an internal grant administrator to assist in keeping the county compliant with all local, state, and federal requirements. Efforts will be made going forward to ensure that all grant funds are properly expended. This includes that all expenditures are properly documented and that all vendors are federally eligible to perform services. Criteria: 2 CFR § 200.317 through 200.327 General Procurement Standards reads as follows: When procuring property and services under a Federal award, a State must follow the same policies and procedures it uses for procurements from its non-Federal funds. The State will comply with §§ 200.321, 200.322, and 200.323 and ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes any clauses required by § 200.327. All other non-Federal entities, including subrecipients of a State, must follow the procurement standards in §§ 200.318 through 200.327. The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non- Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. (b) Non-Federal entities must maintain oversight to ensure that contractors perform in accordance with the terms, conditions, and specifications of their contracts or purchase orders. 2 CFR 180.700 – 180.760 Suspension and 2 CFR 180.800 – 180.885 Debarment Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215.
Condition: During the test of 100% of expenditures, two (2) expenditures totaling $570,080, for the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, the following noncompliance with the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement was noted: • The County failed to properly document the expenditure for one (1) of the two (2) federal expenditures totaling $500,000. They did not execute a contract or award documents, and the invoice was not itemized. This expenditure had a questioned cost of $500,000. Cause of Condition: Policies and procedures have not been designed and implemented to ensure federal expenditures are made in accordance with federal compliance requirements. Effect of Condition: This condition resulted in noncompliance with federal grant requirements and could result in a loss of federal funds. Recommendation: OSAI recommends the County gain an understanding of the requirements for this program and implement internal controls to ensure compliance with these requirements. Management Response: Board of County Commissioners: The Board of County Commissioners is responsible for the overall fiscal concerns of the county. See OKLA. STAT. Title 19, § 345. The Board of County Commissioners, with the cooperation and participation of all elected officials, reviews, develops and implements policies and procedures to create a strong internal control environment. The Board of County Commissioners will work with all elected officials, the third-party administrator, and federal, state and local partners to develop policies, procedures, and internal controls designed to accurately track grants, including the application process, verification, oversight, and reporting of grant requirements. These policies and procedures will be designed to identify requirements for recipients and sub-recipients of grants, ensure accurate equipment and real property management, procurement, recipient and subrecipient monitoring and reporting. Further, policies will ensure a proper understanding of all grant requirements and compliance of the same. To assist in this process, the Board of County Commissioners engaged a third-party administrator to oversee the grant process, including application, eligibility, review, requirements, contracting, recipient tracking and oversight, and documentation and reporting. The Board of County Commissioners will work with the third-party administrator to ensure proper grant administration. Criteria: 2 CFR § 200.303(a) Internal Controls reads as follows: The non-Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). 2 CFR § 200.320 Internal Controls reads as follows: There are three types of procurement methods described in this section: informal procurement methods (for micro-purchases and simplified acquisitions); formal procurement methods (through sealed bids or proposals); and noncompetitive procurement methods. For any of these methods, the recipient or subrecipient must maintain and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319.
Condition: Upon inquiry of county personnel and a test of twenty (20) disbursement totaling $303,873, the following instances of noncompliance were noted: • The County failed to document suspension and debarment of vendors for purchases over $25,000. • The County failed to have written standards of conduct that cover conflicts of interest and that govern the performance of its employees engaged in the selection, award, and administration of contract. Cause of Condition: Policies and procedures have not been designed and implemented to ensure federal disbursements are made in accordance with federal compliance requirements. Effect of Condition: This condition resulted in noncompliance with grant requirements and could result in a loss of federal funds. Recommendation: OSAI recommends the County gain an understanding of the grant requirements for this program and implement internal controls to ensure compliance with these grant requirements. Management Response: Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners: These procurement issues originated during the prior County Clerk’s administration, but the current leadership is focused on corrective measures. Together, we are: • developing a SOP to ensure vendor checks for suspension and debarment are conducted on all purchases over $25,000, • establishing written standards of conduct to address conflicts of interest and set clear procurement guidelines, • and enhancing oversight and review to ensure all procurement processes are fully compliant with federal regulations. Our goal is to build a consistent, transparent procurement framework that safeguards both compliance and public trust. County Clerk: I was not the County Clerk in office at this time. To correct this issue, the County plans to develop a SOP to timely and accurately track and report on the SEFA. The SOP will be reviewed, adopted, and monitored by the Board of County Commissioners. Criteria: Compliance and Reporting Guidance, State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (8. Procurement, Suspension & Debarment.) reads as follows: Recipients are responsible for ensuring that any procurement using SLFRF funds, or payments under procurement contracts using such funds, are consistent with the procurement standards set forth in the Uniform Guidance at 2 CFR 200.317 through 2 CFR 200.327, unless stated otherwise by Treasury. As outlined in FAQ 13.15, only a subset of the Uniform Guidance requirements at 2 CFR Part 200 Subpart D (Post Federal Award Requirements) applies to recipients’ use of funds in the revenue loss eligible use category. The procurement standards set forth in the Uniform Guidance at 2 CRF 200.317 through 2 CRF 200.327 are not included in FAQ 13.15’s list of applicable Subpart D requirements that apply to recipients’ use of funds in the revenue loss eligible use category. The Uniform Guidance establishes in 2 CFR 200.319 that all procurement transactions for property or services must be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition, consistent with standards outlined in 2 CFR 200.320, which allows for non-competitive procurements only in certain circumstances. Recipients must have and use documented procurement procedures that are consistent with the standards outlined in 2 CFR 200.317 through 2 CFR 200.320. In addition, the Uniform Guidance at 2 CFR 200.214, 2 CFR Part 180, and Treasury’s implementing regulations at 31 CFR Part 19, prohibit recipients from entering into contracts with suspended or debarred parties. The procurement standards outlined in the Uniform Guidance require an infrastructure for competitive bidding and contractor oversight, including maintaining written standards of conduct. Your organization must ensure adherence to all applicable local, State, and federal procurement laws and regulations. Further, 2 CFR § 200.319 Competition (d) reads as follows: The non-Federal entity must have written procedures for procurement transactions.
Federal Agency: Department of the Interior Federal Programs: Assistance to Tribally Controlled Community Colleges and Universities Assistance Listing Numbers: 15.027 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: A19AP00118-09 Award Period: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance and Other Matters Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.317 through 200.326 there are procurement standards within the Uniform Guidance. These standards include elements that should be followed pre-contract. Specifically, UG §200.318 states that the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include but are not necessarily limited to the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Condition: The College did not have proper documentation to support one procurement transaction. Questioned Costs: None. Context: During our testing of 8 procurement transactions, it was noted the College did not retain proper documentation related to 1 procurement transaction. Cause: The College did not retain proper documentation of one procurement transaction. Effect: The College was not in compliance with procurement regulations. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the College implement policies and procedures to ensure all procurement documentation is complete and retained. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a plan to correct the finding.
Finding 2022-009 – Lack of Internal Controls Over the SEFA and Noncompliance with Compliance Requirements Over Major Federal Programs – FEMA (Repeat Finding – 2018-006, 2020-008) PASS-THROUGH GRANTOR: Oklahoma Department of Emergency Management FEDERAL AGENCY: U.S. Department of Homeland Security ASSISTANCE LISTING: 97.036 FEDERAL PROGRAM NAME: Disaster Grants – Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters) FEDERAL AWARD NUMBER: DR-4438, DR-4315, and DR-4575 FEDERAL AWARD YEAR: 2022 CONTROL CATEGORY: Activities Allowed or Unallowed; Allowable Costs/Cost Principles; Period of Performance; Reporting; Special Tests and Provisions QUESTIONED COSTS: $1,170,296 Condition: Upon inquiry of District 1 staff and review of documentation and compliance procedures for ALN 97.036, the following items were noted: • Due to scope limitations placed on the audit, auditors were unable to access records and the ability to communicate with District 1 employees was restricted. • Documents provided to the auditors could not be reconciled to the amounts reported on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA). • District 1 does not print or certify any expense reports; therefore, any supporting documentation was not reviewed when reporting federal expenditures to the County Clerk. • District 1 was unable to meet the deadlines set by themselves, as it took nine months for the County to provide limited documentation for federal projects. • Federal expenditures could not be tested due to inadequate implementation of policies and procedures regarding the reporting and retention of federal expense documentation. Cause of Condition: Policies and procedures have not been designed and implemented to ensure accurate reporting on the County’s SEFA, and to ensure federal expenditures are made in accordance with federal compliance requirements. Effect of Condition: These conditions resulted in noncompliance with grant requirements and could result in loss of federal funds to the County. Recommendation: OSAI recommends the County gain an understanding of the compliance requirements for federal programs and implement internal control procedures to ensure compliance with all requirements. Further, we recommend all documentation be properly maintained for inspection and ensure accurate reporting on the County’s SEFA. Management Response: Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners: The County will make sure that all federal documentation is maintained by each district for inspection and will ensure it is accurately reported on the SEFA. District 1 County Commissioner: All work associated with the projects referenced in Audit Finding 2020-005 was completed in accordance with FEMA requirements. The work was fully documented, and final results were physically inspected on site by Oklahoma Emergency Management (OEM) personnel. Both OEM and FEMA reviewed and accepted the work performed and the supporting documentation, as evidenced by the county’s reimbursement for the completed projects. FEMA reimbursement would not have occurred had the work or documentation been deficient. Auditors initially indicated that documentation was required for FEMA Event 4315 only. Subsequently, the scope of the request was expanded to include “all events” without a clear written explanation or formal notification of the expanded scope. Following an on-site visit to the county barn for a tabletop discussion, the auditor sent an email dated May 11, 2023, identifying specific projects for which documentation was reportedly still needed. The projects later cited in Audit Finding 2020-05 were not included in that list. On June 12, 2023, the auditor emailed stating: “I believe I have documents for every project except 4575.203.454750 and 4575.203.454831 (Disaster. Project Worksheet.Site).” The requested documentation was provided promptly, and the auditor acknowledged receipt. He subsequently sent several clarifying questions and, in a final email dated June 20, 2023, stated that he would consult with his team and follow up as needed. No further communication was received from the auditor. or any member of the auditor’s office requesting additional documentation. Nearly three years have elapsed without follow-up. The County does have documentation for all projects listed in the audit finding, and these records were provided to auditors during their on-site visits to the county barn. Auditor Response: District 1 did not comply with all requirements of the federal grant including, but not limited to, providing documentation for audit purposes and preparing accurate and reconciled reports. The required documentation to support the FEMA expenditures were not provided to the auditors. Physical inspections by FEMA or OEM do not constitute an audit under Uniform Guidance. An audit includes examining all supporting documentation to ensure the County complied with all the compliance requirements required by Uniform Guidance. Maintaining adequate documentation to support federal grant expenditures is critical for the County to comply with federal compliance requirements. Criteria: 2 CFR § 200.303(a) Internal Controls reads as follows: The non-Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Title 2 CFR § 200.318 (a), General procurement standards, reads as follows: The recipient or subrecipient must maintain and use documented procedures for procurement transactions under a Federal award or subaward, including for acquisition of property or services. These documented procurement procedures must be consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards identified in 200.317 through 200.327. Title 2 CFR § 200.84 Questioned Cost reads as follows: Questioned cost means a cost that is questioned by the auditor because of an audit finding: (a) Which resulted from a violation or possible violation of a statute, regulation, or the terms and conditions of a Federal award, including for fund used to match Federal funds; (b) Where the costs, at the time of the audit, are not supported by adequate documentation; or (c) Where the costs incurred appear unreasonable and do not reflect the actions a prudent person would take in the circumstances. Further, GAO Standards – Section 2 – Objectives of an Entity – OV2.23 states in part: Compliance Objectives Management conducts activities in accordance with applicable laws and regulations. As part of specifying compliance objectives, the entity determines which laws and regulations apply to the entity. Management is expected to set objectives that incorporate these requirements. [….] The limitations of the auditor are described in the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants Clarified Statements on Auditing Standards AU-C § 210, which states, in part: “The concept of an independent audit requires that the auditor's role does not involve assuming management's responsibility for the preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements or assuming responsibility for the entity's related internal control and that the auditor has a reasonable expectation of obtaining the information necessary for the audit insofar as management is able to provide or procure it. Accordingly, the premise is fundamental to the conduct of an independent audit.”
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY 2022-004 - Procurement, Suspension & Debarment Federal Program Information: ALN - 10.760 - Water and Waste Disposal Systems for Rural Communities Criteria: The following CFR(s) apply to this finding: 2 CFR 200.317-200.326. Condition: During audit procedures, it was identified that the Town did not have a procurement policy in place. Cause: The Town needs to adopt a procurement policy to comply with Uniform Guidance. Effect: Procurements might not conform to applicable Federal laws. Identification of Questioned Costs: None identified. Context: The entire population. Repeat Finding: This is a repeat finding of 2021-004. Recommendation: It is recommended that the Town adopt a procurement policy that follows the Uniform Guidance and that the Town implement internal control processes and procedures to ensure that the adopted policy is followed. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan: Client agrees with finding, and a version of their response can be found in the Corrective Action Plan. Please see the Corrective Action Plan issued by the Town of Livermore Falls.
Federal Agency: Department of Housing and Urban Development and Department of Veterans Affairs Federal Program Name: Emergency Solutions Grant Program and VA Homeless Providers Grant and Per Diem Program Assistance Listing Number: 14.231 and 64.024 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: E20DW37001-2022 and ODMH543-1306-659-PC-21 Pass-Through Agency: North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Aging and Adult Services Pass-Through Number(s): 00041416 Award Period: 7/29/2020 – 6/30/2022 and 10/1/2021 – 9/30/2022 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria or specific requirement: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.318 (a), the non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. Condition: During our testing, we noted the Organization did not have documented procurement policies and procedures. Questioned costs: None Context: During our testing, we noted the Organization did not have documented procurement policies. Cause: The Organization did not have established procurement policies and did not have internal controls designed to ensure compliance with Federal procurement standards. Effect: The Organization was not in compliance with the Compliance Supplement and the Code of Federal Regulations related to procurement and suspension and debarment provisions. Repeat Finding: Yes Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization adopt a formal and written procurement policy. Additionally, management should develop controls to help ensure procurement procedures are followed and to monitor the amount spent with vendors throughout the year to ensure procurement procedures are initiated when the vendor costs exceed the procurement thresholds. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the finding.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 2022-002 Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Program Name of Federal Program (CFDA Number) Health Centers Cluster: Consolidated Health Centers (93.224) Grants for Newly Expanded Services under the Health Care Program (93.527) Criteria - Recipients of federal awards must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR section 200.317 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable State laws and regulations, provided that the procedures conform to applicable Federal law and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200. Recipients ?must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price? 2 CFR section 200.318(i). The Center?s procurement procedures include the requirement to maintain sufficient documentation of the history of procurement. The Center also has procedures to identify procurement transactions requiring competitive bids or proposals. Context and Condition - We selected four contracts/purchases to test for compliance with procurement standards. Records for two contracts lacked documentation sufficient to detail procurement history. Cause - The Center did not follow its documentation policy for obtaining contracts or bids. Effect - A potential failure to conduct procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition exists. Questioned Costs - No costs were questioned. Repeat Finding - No. Statistically valid - Yes. Recommendation - We recommend the Center ensure it 1) maintains documentation of the history of procurement and 2) monitors compliance with documentation requirements. Views of responsible officials - The Center will review its procurement policies and internal controls and ensure timely action is taken when noncompliance is identified.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 2022-002 Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Program Name of Federal Program (CFDA Number) Health Centers Cluster: Consolidated Health Centers (93.224) Grants for Newly Expanded Services under the Health Care Program (93.527) Criteria - Recipients of federal awards must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR section 200.317 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable State laws and regulations, provided that the procedures conform to applicable Federal law and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200. Recipients ?must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price? 2 CFR section 200.318(i). The Center?s procurement procedures include the requirement to maintain sufficient documentation of the history of procurement. The Center also has procedures to identify procurement transactions requiring competitive bids or proposals. Context and Condition - We selected four contracts/purchases to test for compliance with procurement standards. Records for two contracts lacked documentation sufficient to detail procurement history. Cause - The Center did not follow its documentation policy for obtaining contracts or bids. Effect - A potential failure to conduct procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition exists. Questioned Costs - No costs were questioned. Repeat Finding - No. Statistically valid - Yes. Recommendation - We recommend the Center ensure it 1) maintains documentation of the history of procurement and 2) monitors compliance with documentation requirements. Views of responsible officials - The Center will review its procurement policies and internal controls and ensure timely action is taken when noncompliance is identified.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 2022-002 Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Program Name of Federal Program (CFDA Number) Health Centers Cluster: Consolidated Health Centers (93.224) Grants for Newly Expanded Services under the Health Care Program (93.527) Criteria - Recipients of federal awards must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR section 200.317 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable State laws and regulations, provided that the procedures conform to applicable Federal law and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200. Recipients ?must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price? 2 CFR section 200.318(i). The Center?s procurement procedures include the requirement to maintain sufficient documentation of the history of procurement. The Center also has procedures to identify procurement transactions requiring competitive bids or proposals. Context and Condition - We selected four contracts/purchases to test for compliance with procurement standards. Records for two contracts lacked documentation sufficient to detail procurement history. Cause - The Center did not follow its documentation policy for obtaining contracts or bids. Effect - A potential failure to conduct procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition exists. Questioned Costs - No costs were questioned. Repeat Finding - No. Statistically valid - Yes. Recommendation - We recommend the Center ensure it 1) maintains documentation of the history of procurement and 2) monitors compliance with documentation requirements. Views of responsible officials - The Center will review its procurement policies and internal controls and ensure timely action is taken when noncompliance is identified.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 2022-002 Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Program Name of Federal Program (CFDA Number) Health Centers Cluster: Consolidated Health Centers (93.224) Grants for Newly Expanded Services under the Health Care Program (93.527) Criteria - Recipients of federal awards must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR section 200.317 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable State laws and regulations, provided that the procedures conform to applicable Federal law and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200. Recipients ?must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price? 2 CFR section 200.318(i). The Center?s procurement procedures include the requirement to maintain sufficient documentation of the history of procurement. The Center also has procedures to identify procurement transactions requiring competitive bids or proposals. Context and Condition - We selected four contracts/purchases to test for compliance with procurement standards. Records for two contracts lacked documentation sufficient to detail procurement history. Cause - The Center did not follow its documentation policy for obtaining contracts or bids. Effect - A potential failure to conduct procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition exists. Questioned Costs - No costs were questioned. Repeat Finding - No. Statistically valid - Yes. Recommendation - We recommend the Center ensure it 1) maintains documentation of the history of procurement and 2) monitors compliance with documentation requirements. Views of responsible officials - The Center will review its procurement policies and internal controls and ensure timely action is taken when noncompliance is identified.
2021-002 Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Grantor: U.S. Department of Treasury/U.S. Department of Justice Award Name: Equitable Sharing Program Award Year: 01/01/21 – 12/31/21 CFDA Numbers: 21.016 / 16.922 Criteria OMB Uniform Guidance §200.319 states that all procurement transactions for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award must be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition consistent with the standards of this section and §200.320, which states that the non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. Condition During our procurement testing procedures, we selected 24 items from the vendor history activity report and traced them to procurement and bidding procedures. Through our testing, we identified two purchases made using Federal funds to purchase vehicles, that were not publicly advertised or made through a non-competitive procurement process. Both of the items exceeded the public bidding threshold but did not follow formal procurements procedures. Cause Due to the global pandemic, the availability of vehicles has become limited. The Borough police department needed specific vehicles for their operations and made the purchases without using formal procurement procedures to avoid the risk of losing the opportunity to purchase the vehicles. Effect The procurement procedures were not followed as required, therefore, Federally funded purchases bypassed procurement regulations. Questioned Costs None noted. Recommendation The Borough should follow procurement policy and publicly advertise for sealed bids on contracts or purchases over $44,000, documenting the significant history of the procurement in the contract file. Management’s View and Corrective Action Plan Management’s views and corrective action plan is included under separate cover and filed with the State of New Jersey.
Criteria: A non-federal entity is required to have certain written policies and procedure in compliance with Uniform Guidance and must comply with the procurement standards as described in 2 CFR 200.318 through 2 CFR 200.327. Specifically, the non-federal entity must comply with the following: • The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. • If the non-Federal entity has a parent, affiliate, or subsidiary organization that is not a State, local government, or Indian tribe, the non-Federal entity must also maintain written standards of conduct covering organizational conflicts of interest. Organizational conflicts of interest means that because of relationships with a parent company, affiliate, or subsidiary organization, the non-Federal entity is unable or appears to be unable to be impartial in conducting a procurement action involving a related organization. Condition: AIRS does not appear to have created written purchasing or procurement policies and procedures as required by 2 CFR 200.318(a). Since AIRS is an affiliate organization of the Ethiopian Community Development Council (ECDC), it appears that the relationship between AIRS and ECDC meets the “affiliate” requirement under 2 CFR 200.318 (c) (2). It does appear that AIRS has created written standards of conduct covering organizational conflicts of interest. Cause: Management has not created or maintained certain written policies and procedures as required under 2 CFR 200.318. Effect: AIRS is not in compliance with certain written policies and procedures as required under 2 CFR 200.318. Questioned Costs: None reported Repeat Finding from Prior Year: No Recommendation: Management and board should create written procurement policies and procedures and written standards of conduct covering organizational conflicts of interest that comply with the procurement standards as required under 2 CFR 200.317 through 2 CFR 200.327. Views of Responsible Officials: Management concurs with this audit finding.
2021-004: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment: Federal Program: Assistance Listing Nos.: 14.267 Continuum of Care Program Condition: The organization was unable to demonstrate controls over the procurement for five items selected for testing. Criteria: The requirements that apply to procurement under grants and cooperative agreements are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.326, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. The requirements that apply to procurement under cost-reimbursement contracts under the FAR are contained in 48 CFR parts 03, 15, 44 and the clauses at 48 CFR sections 52.244-2, 52.244-5, 52.203-13, 52.203-16, and 52.215-12; agency FAR Supplements; and the terms and conditions of the contract. Questioned Costs: There were six expenses that no support could be provided to support the expense took place during grant period as such there is a question cost of $2,447. Effect: The Organization could have expenses that were paid that did not meet their own procurement policy. Cause: The Organization did not have good controls on ensuring the procurement requirement was meet due to staff turn over and being unable to locate documentation. Recommendation: In order to prevent future occurrences of this deficiency, we recommend that management enhance a set of controls to ensure that they are able to demonstrate that all expenses meet their procurement policy. Perspective: This is a systemic issue in that controls over the requirement are not being adhered to ensure no issues arise. Repeat: This is not a repeat finding. Responsible Official’s View: The Organization agrees with the finding. See attached corrective action plan.
2021-004: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment: Federal Program: Assistance Listing Nos.: 14.267 Continuum of Care Program Condition: The organization was unable to demonstrate controls over the procurement for five items selected for testing. Criteria: The requirements that apply to procurement under grants and cooperative agreements are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.326, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. The requirements that apply to procurement under cost-reimbursement contracts under the FAR are contained in 48 CFR parts 03, 15, 44 and the clauses at 48 CFR sections 52.244-2, 52.244-5, 52.203-13, 52.203-16, and 52.215-12; agency FAR Supplements; and the terms and conditions of the contract. Questioned Costs: There were six expenses that no support could be provided to support the expense took place during grant period as such there is a question cost of $2,447. Effect: The Organization could have expenses that were paid that did not meet their own procurement policy. Cause: The Organization did not have good controls on ensuring the procurement requirement was meet due to staff turn over and being unable to locate documentation. Recommendation: In order to prevent future occurrences of this deficiency, we recommend that management enhance a set of controls to ensure that they are able to demonstrate that all expenses meet their procurement policy. Perspective: This is a systemic issue in that controls over the requirement are not being adhered to ensure no issues arise. Repeat: This is not a repeat finding. Responsible Official’s View: The Organization agrees with the finding. See attached corrective action plan.
2021-004: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment: Federal Program: Assistance Listing Nos.: 14.267 Continuum of Care Program Condition: The organization was unable to demonstrate controls over the procurement for five items selected for testing. Criteria: The requirements that apply to procurement under grants and cooperative agreements are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.326, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. The requirements that apply to procurement under cost-reimbursement contracts under the FAR are contained in 48 CFR parts 03, 15, 44 and the clauses at 48 CFR sections 52.244-2, 52.244-5, 52.203-13, 52.203-16, and 52.215-12; agency FAR Supplements; and the terms and conditions of the contract. Questioned Costs: There were six expenses that no support could be provided to support the expense took place during grant period as such there is a question cost of $2,447. Effect: The Organization could have expenses that were paid that did not meet their own procurement policy. Cause: The Organization did not have good controls on ensuring the procurement requirement was meet due to staff turn over and being unable to locate documentation. Recommendation: In order to prevent future occurrences of this deficiency, we recommend that management enhance a set of controls to ensure that they are able to demonstrate that all expenses meet their procurement policy. Perspective: This is a systemic issue in that controls over the requirement are not being adhered to ensure no issues arise. Repeat: This is not a repeat finding. Responsible Official’s View: The Organization agrees with the finding. See attached corrective action plan.
2021-004: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment: Federal Program: Assistance Listing Nos.: 14.267 Continuum of Care Program Condition: The organization was unable to demonstrate controls over the procurement for five items selected for testing. Criteria: The requirements that apply to procurement under grants and cooperative agreements are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.326, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. The requirements that apply to procurement under cost-reimbursement contracts under the FAR are contained in 48 CFR parts 03, 15, 44 and the clauses at 48 CFR sections 52.244-2, 52.244-5, 52.203-13, 52.203-16, and 52.215-12; agency FAR Supplements; and the terms and conditions of the contract. Questioned Costs: There were six expenses that no support could be provided to support the expense took place during grant period as such there is a question cost of $2,447. Effect: The Organization could have expenses that were paid that did not meet their own procurement policy. Cause: The Organization did not have good controls on ensuring the procurement requirement was meet due to staff turn over and being unable to locate documentation. Recommendation: In order to prevent future occurrences of this deficiency, we recommend that management enhance a set of controls to ensure that they are able to demonstrate that all expenses meet their procurement policy. Perspective: This is a systemic issue in that controls over the requirement are not being adhered to ensure no issues arise. Repeat: This is not a repeat finding. Responsible Official’s View: The Organization agrees with the finding. See attached corrective action plan.
Finding 2021-005: Procurement Federal Programs: Research and Development Cluster: All Grants Criteria or Specific Requirement (Including Statutory, Regulatory, or Other Citation): Procedures articulated in 2 CFR 200.317-326, requires that for all procurement of goods and services, some form of cost or price analysis shall be made and documented in the procurement files in connection with every procurement action based on the dollar thresholds sited in the compliance code. Condition: AAPT did not consistently adhere to written policies with respect to the procurement process, as bids/quotes were not obtainable or the conclusion for selection was not documented. Cause: AAPT’s internal policies and procedures governing procurement were not consistently applied. Effect or Potential Effect: Without proper and complete procurement documentation, there is a risk that AAPT will not perform proper evaluation of each element of cost to determine reasonableness. Questioned Costs: None noted. Context: Our audit procedures consisted of internal control testwork over the cash disbursement cycle over a sample population of expenditures. We consider our sample to be representative of the population. The condition appeared to be systematic in nature. Identification as a Repeat Finding, if Applicable: 2020-005. Recommendation: We recommend that all procurement records for purchases in excess of the purchase threshold include the following, at a minimum: (a) basis for contractor/goods selection or (b) justification for lack of competition when competitive bids or offers are not obtained. Additionally, the conclusion should be clearly documented and accompanying the procurement documentation. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management will update current policies and procedures and review and enforce the polices. Management will be responsible for proper documentation and confirmation that all policies and procedures are followed. Management will confirm that all agreements, mou’s and contracts are property, reviewed signed and documented. Management will require all departments to document all procurements for goods and services with written cost and price analysis based on AAPT's dollar thresholds. Anticipated Completion Date: 04/15/2024 Responsible Official: Dr. Beth Cunningham CEO, Michael Brosnan CFO
Finding 2021-005: Procurement Federal Programs: Research and Development Cluster: All Grants Criteria or Specific Requirement (Including Statutory, Regulatory, or Other Citation): Procedures articulated in 2 CFR 200.317-326, requires that for all procurement of goods and services, some form of cost or price analysis shall be made and documented in the procurement files in connection with every procurement action based on the dollar thresholds sited in the compliance code. Condition: AAPT did not consistently adhere to written policies with respect to the procurement process, as bids/quotes were not obtainable or the conclusion for selection was not documented. Cause: AAPT’s internal policies and procedures governing procurement were not consistently applied. Effect or Potential Effect: Without proper and complete procurement documentation, there is a risk that AAPT will not perform proper evaluation of each element of cost to determine reasonableness. Questioned Costs: None noted. Context: Our audit procedures consisted of internal control testwork over the cash disbursement cycle over a sample population of expenditures. We consider our sample to be representative of the population. The condition appeared to be systematic in nature. Identification as a Repeat Finding, if Applicable: 2020-005. Recommendation: We recommend that all procurement records for purchases in excess of the purchase threshold include the following, at a minimum: (a) basis for contractor/goods selection or (b) justification for lack of competition when competitive bids or offers are not obtained. Additionally, the conclusion should be clearly documented and accompanying the procurement documentation. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management will update current policies and procedures and review and enforce the polices. Management will be responsible for proper documentation and confirmation that all policies and procedures are followed. Management will confirm that all agreements, mou’s and contracts are property, reviewed signed and documented. Management will require all departments to document all procurements for goods and services with written cost and price analysis based on AAPT's dollar thresholds. Anticipated Completion Date: 04/15/2024 Responsible Official: Dr. Beth Cunningham CEO, Michael Brosnan CFO
Finding 2021-005: Procurement Federal Programs: Research and Development Cluster: All Grants Criteria or Specific Requirement (Including Statutory, Regulatory, or Other Citation): Procedures articulated in 2 CFR 200.317-326, requires that for all procurement of goods and services, some form of cost or price analysis shall be made and documented in the procurement files in connection with every procurement action based on the dollar thresholds sited in the compliance code. Condition: AAPT did not consistently adhere to written policies with respect to the procurement process, as bids/quotes were not obtainable or the conclusion for selection was not documented. Cause: AAPT’s internal policies and procedures governing procurement were not consistently applied. Effect or Potential Effect: Without proper and complete procurement documentation, there is a risk that AAPT will not perform proper evaluation of each element of cost to determine reasonableness. Questioned Costs: None noted. Context: Our audit procedures consisted of internal control testwork over the cash disbursement cycle over a sample population of expenditures. We consider our sample to be representative of the population. The condition appeared to be systematic in nature. Identification as a Repeat Finding, if Applicable: 2020-005. Recommendation: We recommend that all procurement records for purchases in excess of the purchase threshold include the following, at a minimum: (a) basis for contractor/goods selection or (b) justification for lack of competition when competitive bids or offers are not obtained. Additionally, the conclusion should be clearly documented and accompanying the procurement documentation. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management will update current policies and procedures and review and enforce the polices. Management will be responsible for proper documentation and confirmation that all policies and procedures are followed. Management will confirm that all agreements, mou’s and contracts are property, reviewed signed and documented. Management will require all departments to document all procurements for goods and services with written cost and price analysis based on AAPT's dollar thresholds. Anticipated Completion Date: 04/15/2024 Responsible Official: Dr. Beth Cunningham CEO, Michael Brosnan CFO
Finding 2021-005: Procurement Federal Programs: Research and Development Cluster: All Grants Criteria or Specific Requirement (Including Statutory, Regulatory, or Other Citation): Procedures articulated in 2 CFR 200.317-326, requires that for all procurement of goods and services, some form of cost or price analysis shall be made and documented in the procurement files in connection with every procurement action based on the dollar thresholds sited in the compliance code. Condition: AAPT did not consistently adhere to written policies with respect to the procurement process, as bids/quotes were not obtainable or the conclusion for selection was not documented. Cause: AAPT’s internal policies and procedures governing procurement were not consistently applied. Effect or Potential Effect: Without proper and complete procurement documentation, there is a risk that AAPT will not perform proper evaluation of each element of cost to determine reasonableness. Questioned Costs: None noted. Context: Our audit procedures consisted of internal control testwork over the cash disbursement cycle over a sample population of expenditures. We consider our sample to be representative of the population. The condition appeared to be systematic in nature. Identification as a Repeat Finding, if Applicable: 2020-005. Recommendation: We recommend that all procurement records for purchases in excess of the purchase threshold include the following, at a minimum: (a) basis for contractor/goods selection or (b) justification for lack of competition when competitive bids or offers are not obtained. Additionally, the conclusion should be clearly documented and accompanying the procurement documentation. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management will update current policies and procedures and review and enforce the polices. Management will be responsible for proper documentation and confirmation that all policies and procedures are followed. Management will confirm that all agreements, mou’s and contracts are property, reviewed signed and documented. Management will require all departments to document all procurements for goods and services with written cost and price analysis based on AAPT's dollar thresholds. Anticipated Completion Date: 04/15/2024 Responsible Official: Dr. Beth Cunningham CEO, Michael Brosnan CFO
Finding 2021-005: Procurement Federal Programs: Research and Development Cluster: All Grants Criteria or Specific Requirement (Including Statutory, Regulatory, or Other Citation): Procedures articulated in 2 CFR 200.317-326, requires that for all procurement of goods and services, some form of cost or price analysis shall be made and documented in the procurement files in connection with every procurement action based on the dollar thresholds sited in the compliance code. Condition: AAPT did not consistently adhere to written policies with respect to the procurement process, as bids/quotes were not obtainable or the conclusion for selection was not documented. Cause: AAPT’s internal policies and procedures governing procurement were not consistently applied. Effect or Potential Effect: Without proper and complete procurement documentation, there is a risk that AAPT will not perform proper evaluation of each element of cost to determine reasonableness. Questioned Costs: None noted. Context: Our audit procedures consisted of internal control testwork over the cash disbursement cycle over a sample population of expenditures. We consider our sample to be representative of the population. The condition appeared to be systematic in nature. Identification as a Repeat Finding, if Applicable: 2020-005. Recommendation: We recommend that all procurement records for purchases in excess of the purchase threshold include the following, at a minimum: (a) basis for contractor/goods selection or (b) justification for lack of competition when competitive bids or offers are not obtained. Additionally, the conclusion should be clearly documented and accompanying the procurement documentation. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management will update current policies and procedures and review and enforce the polices. Management will be responsible for proper documentation and confirmation that all policies and procedures are followed. Management will confirm that all agreements, mou’s and contracts are property, reviewed signed and documented. Management will require all departments to document all procurements for goods and services with written cost and price analysis based on AAPT's dollar thresholds. Anticipated Completion Date: 04/15/2024 Responsible Official: Dr. Beth Cunningham CEO, Michael Brosnan CFO
Finding 2021-005: Procurement Federal Programs: Research and Development Cluster: All Grants Criteria or Specific Requirement (Including Statutory, Regulatory, or Other Citation): Procedures articulated in 2 CFR 200.317-326, requires that for all procurement of goods and services, some form of cost or price analysis shall be made and documented in the procurement files in connection with every procurement action based on the dollar thresholds sited in the compliance code. Condition: AAPT did not consistently adhere to written policies with respect to the procurement process, as bids/quotes were not obtainable or the conclusion for selection was not documented. Cause: AAPT’s internal policies and procedures governing procurement were not consistently applied. Effect or Potential Effect: Without proper and complete procurement documentation, there is a risk that AAPT will not perform proper evaluation of each element of cost to determine reasonableness. Questioned Costs: None noted. Context: Our audit procedures consisted of internal control testwork over the cash disbursement cycle over a sample population of expenditures. We consider our sample to be representative of the population. The condition appeared to be systematic in nature. Identification as a Repeat Finding, if Applicable: 2020-005. Recommendation: We recommend that all procurement records for purchases in excess of the purchase threshold include the following, at a minimum: (a) basis for contractor/goods selection or (b) justification for lack of competition when competitive bids or offers are not obtained. Additionally, the conclusion should be clearly documented and accompanying the procurement documentation. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management will update current policies and procedures and review and enforce the polices. Management will be responsible for proper documentation and confirmation that all policies and procedures are followed. Management will confirm that all agreements, mou’s and contracts are property, reviewed signed and documented. Management will require all departments to document all procurements for goods and services with written cost and price analysis based on AAPT's dollar thresholds. Anticipated Completion Date: 04/15/2024 Responsible Official: Dr. Beth Cunningham CEO, Michael Brosnan CFO
Finding 2021-005: Procurement Federal Programs: Research and Development Cluster: All Grants Criteria or Specific Requirement (Including Statutory, Regulatory, or Other Citation): Procedures articulated in 2 CFR 200.317-326, requires that for all procurement of goods and services, some form of cost or price analysis shall be made and documented in the procurement files in connection with every procurement action based on the dollar thresholds sited in the compliance code. Condition: AAPT did not consistently adhere to written policies with respect to the procurement process, as bids/quotes were not obtainable or the conclusion for selection was not documented. Cause: AAPT’s internal policies and procedures governing procurement were not consistently applied. Effect or Potential Effect: Without proper and complete procurement documentation, there is a risk that AAPT will not perform proper evaluation of each element of cost to determine reasonableness. Questioned Costs: None noted. Context: Our audit procedures consisted of internal control testwork over the cash disbursement cycle over a sample population of expenditures. We consider our sample to be representative of the population. The condition appeared to be systematic in nature. Identification as a Repeat Finding, if Applicable: 2020-005. Recommendation: We recommend that all procurement records for purchases in excess of the purchase threshold include the following, at a minimum: (a) basis for contractor/goods selection or (b) justification for lack of competition when competitive bids or offers are not obtained. Additionally, the conclusion should be clearly documented and accompanying the procurement documentation. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management will update current policies and procedures and review and enforce the polices. Management will be responsible for proper documentation and confirmation that all policies and procedures are followed. Management will confirm that all agreements, mou’s and contracts are property, reviewed signed and documented. Management will require all departments to document all procurements for goods and services with written cost and price analysis based on AAPT's dollar thresholds. Anticipated Completion Date: 04/15/2024 Responsible Official: Dr. Beth Cunningham CEO, Michael Brosnan CFO
Finding 2021-005: Procurement Federal Programs: Research and Development Cluster: All Grants Criteria or Specific Requirement (Including Statutory, Regulatory, or Other Citation): Procedures articulated in 2 CFR 200.317-326, requires that for all procurement of goods and services, some form of cost or price analysis shall be made and documented in the procurement files in connection with every procurement action based on the dollar thresholds sited in the compliance code. Condition: AAPT did not consistently adhere to written policies with respect to the procurement process, as bids/quotes were not obtainable or the conclusion for selection was not documented. Cause: AAPT’s internal policies and procedures governing procurement were not consistently applied. Effect or Potential Effect: Without proper and complete procurement documentation, there is a risk that AAPT will not perform proper evaluation of each element of cost to determine reasonableness. Questioned Costs: None noted. Context: Our audit procedures consisted of internal control testwork over the cash disbursement cycle over a sample population of expenditures. We consider our sample to be representative of the population. The condition appeared to be systematic in nature. Identification as a Repeat Finding, if Applicable: 2020-005. Recommendation: We recommend that all procurement records for purchases in excess of the purchase threshold include the following, at a minimum: (a) basis for contractor/goods selection or (b) justification for lack of competition when competitive bids or offers are not obtained. Additionally, the conclusion should be clearly documented and accompanying the procurement documentation. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management will update current policies and procedures and review and enforce the polices. Management will be responsible for proper documentation and confirmation that all policies and procedures are followed. Management will confirm that all agreements, mou’s and contracts are property, reviewed signed and documented. Management will require all departments to document all procurements for goods and services with written cost and price analysis based on AAPT's dollar thresholds. Anticipated Completion Date: 04/15/2024 Responsible Official: Dr. Beth Cunningham CEO, Michael Brosnan CFO
Finding 2021-005: Procurement Federal Programs: Research and Development Cluster: All Grants Criteria or Specific Requirement (Including Statutory, Regulatory, or Other Citation): Procedures articulated in 2 CFR 200.317-326, requires that for all procurement of goods and services, some form of cost or price analysis shall be made and documented in the procurement files in connection with every procurement action based on the dollar thresholds sited in the compliance code. Condition: AAPT did not consistently adhere to written policies with respect to the procurement process, as bids/quotes were not obtainable or the conclusion for selection was not documented. Cause: AAPT’s internal policies and procedures governing procurement were not consistently applied. Effect or Potential Effect: Without proper and complete procurement documentation, there is a risk that AAPT will not perform proper evaluation of each element of cost to determine reasonableness. Questioned Costs: None noted. Context: Our audit procedures consisted of internal control testwork over the cash disbursement cycle over a sample population of expenditures. We consider our sample to be representative of the population. The condition appeared to be systematic in nature. Identification as a Repeat Finding, if Applicable: 2020-005. Recommendation: We recommend that all procurement records for purchases in excess of the purchase threshold include the following, at a minimum: (a) basis for contractor/goods selection or (b) justification for lack of competition when competitive bids or offers are not obtained. Additionally, the conclusion should be clearly documented and accompanying the procurement documentation. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management will update current policies and procedures and review and enforce the polices. Management will be responsible for proper documentation and confirmation that all policies and procedures are followed. Management will confirm that all agreements, mou’s and contracts are property, reviewed signed and documented. Management will require all departments to document all procurements for goods and services with written cost and price analysis based on AAPT's dollar thresholds. Anticipated Completion Date: 04/15/2024 Responsible Official: Dr. Beth Cunningham CEO, Michael Brosnan CFO
Finding 2021-005: Procurement Federal Programs: Research and Development Cluster: All Grants Criteria or Specific Requirement (Including Statutory, Regulatory, or Other Citation): Procedures articulated in 2 CFR 200.317-326, requires that for all procurement of goods and services, some form of cost or price analysis shall be made and documented in the procurement files in connection with every procurement action based on the dollar thresholds sited in the compliance code. Condition: AAPT did not consistently adhere to written policies with respect to the procurement process, as bids/quotes were not obtainable or the conclusion for selection was not documented. Cause: AAPT’s internal policies and procedures governing procurement were not consistently applied. Effect or Potential Effect: Without proper and complete procurement documentation, there is a risk that AAPT will not perform proper evaluation of each element of cost to determine reasonableness. Questioned Costs: None noted. Context: Our audit procedures consisted of internal control testwork over the cash disbursement cycle over a sample population of expenditures. We consider our sample to be representative of the population. The condition appeared to be systematic in nature. Identification as a Repeat Finding, if Applicable: 2020-005. Recommendation: We recommend that all procurement records for purchases in excess of the purchase threshold include the following, at a minimum: (a) basis for contractor/goods selection or (b) justification for lack of competition when competitive bids or offers are not obtained. Additionally, the conclusion should be clearly documented and accompanying the procurement documentation. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management will update current policies and procedures and review and enforce the polices. Management will be responsible for proper documentation and confirmation that all policies and procedures are followed. Management will confirm that all agreements, mou’s and contracts are property, reviewed signed and documented. Management will require all departments to document all procurements for goods and services with written cost and price analysis based on AAPT's dollar thresholds. Anticipated Completion Date: 04/15/2024 Responsible Official: Dr. Beth Cunningham CEO, Michael Brosnan CFO
Finding 2021-005: Procurement Federal Programs: Research and Development Cluster: All Grants Criteria or Specific Requirement (Including Statutory, Regulatory, or Other Citation): Procedures articulated in 2 CFR 200.317-326, requires that for all procurement of goods and services, some form of cost or price analysis shall be made and documented in the procurement files in connection with every procurement action based on the dollar thresholds sited in the compliance code. Condition: AAPT did not consistently adhere to written policies with respect to the procurement process, as bids/quotes were not obtainable or the conclusion for selection was not documented. Cause: AAPT’s internal policies and procedures governing procurement were not consistently applied. Effect or Potential Effect: Without proper and complete procurement documentation, there is a risk that AAPT will not perform proper evaluation of each element of cost to determine reasonableness. Questioned Costs: None noted. Context: Our audit procedures consisted of internal control testwork over the cash disbursement cycle over a sample population of expenditures. We consider our sample to be representative of the population. The condition appeared to be systematic in nature. Identification as a Repeat Finding, if Applicable: 2020-005. Recommendation: We recommend that all procurement records for purchases in excess of the purchase threshold include the following, at a minimum: (a) basis for contractor/goods selection or (b) justification for lack of competition when competitive bids or offers are not obtained. Additionally, the conclusion should be clearly documented and accompanying the procurement documentation. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management will update current policies and procedures and review and enforce the polices. Management will be responsible for proper documentation and confirmation that all policies and procedures are followed. Management will confirm that all agreements, mou’s and contracts are property, reviewed signed and documented. Management will require all departments to document all procurements for goods and services with written cost and price analysis based on AAPT's dollar thresholds. Anticipated Completion Date: 04/15/2024 Responsible Official: Dr. Beth Cunningham CEO, Michael Brosnan CFO
Finding 2021-005: Procurement Federal Programs: Research and Development Cluster: All Grants Criteria or Specific Requirement (Including Statutory, Regulatory, or Other Citation): Procedures articulated in 2 CFR 200.317-326, requires that for all procurement of goods and services, some form of cost or price analysis shall be made and documented in the procurement files in connection with every procurement action based on the dollar thresholds sited in the compliance code. Condition: AAPT did not consistently adhere to written policies with respect to the procurement process, as bids/quotes were not obtainable or the conclusion for selection was not documented. Cause: AAPT’s internal policies and procedures governing procurement were not consistently applied. Effect or Potential Effect: Without proper and complete procurement documentation, there is a risk that AAPT will not perform proper evaluation of each element of cost to determine reasonableness. Questioned Costs: None noted. Context: Our audit procedures consisted of internal control testwork over the cash disbursement cycle over a sample population of expenditures. We consider our sample to be representative of the population. The condition appeared to be systematic in nature. Identification as a Repeat Finding, if Applicable: 2020-005. Recommendation: We recommend that all procurement records for purchases in excess of the purchase threshold include the following, at a minimum: (a) basis for contractor/goods selection or (b) justification for lack of competition when competitive bids or offers are not obtained. Additionally, the conclusion should be clearly documented and accompanying the procurement documentation. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management will update current policies and procedures and review and enforce the polices. Management will be responsible for proper documentation and confirmation that all policies and procedures are followed. Management will confirm that all agreements, mou’s and contracts are property, reviewed signed and documented. Management will require all departments to document all procurements for goods and services with written cost and price analysis based on AAPT's dollar thresholds. Anticipated Completion Date: 04/15/2024 Responsible Official: Dr. Beth Cunningham CEO, Michael Brosnan CFO