Finding 2023-002: Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment (Material Weakness) Federal Program: Assistance Listing Number 14.267 Criterion or Specific Requirements: 2 CFR Section 200.318 requires that the non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. 2 CFR Section 200.214 requires that, for covered transactions, a non-Federal entity must verify that entities are not suspended, debarred or otherwise excluded. This verification may be accomplished by checking the System for Award Management (SAM) website maintained by the General Services Administration. Condition: IW has a formal written procurement policy, but it does not conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327, which is the Uniform Guidance. As a result, no procurement files were maintained to document IW's procurement actions. In addition, for all disbursements tested, IW could not provide documentation of their verification, prior to payment, that the vendors were not suspended, debarred or otherwise excluded. Questioned Costs: None. Cause: IW has not updated its written procurement policy to conform to the Uniform Guidance. In addition, IW did not require that evidence of SAM checks be maintained in its vendor files. As a result, IW did not maintain adequate support to provide evidence that appropriate suspension and debarment searches were performed. Despite the lack of documentation, a search was performed after the fact to verify that the vendors or individuals in our sample were not suspended, debarred or otherwise excluded. Therefore, no questioned costs have been reported related to the sample that was tested. Effect or Potential Effect: Without an updated procurement policy that conforms to the Uniform Guidance and related procurement documentation, there is a risk that IW did not perform a proper evaluation of each potential vendor whose costs were charged to Federal programs. In addition, IW could not readily provide evidence that it had assessed whether or not its vendors were suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. As a result, the potential for payments to suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded vendors and individuals exists. Recommendation: IW should revise its procurement policy so that it conforms to the Uniform Guidance. Furthermore, IW should maintain documentation in its files to provide evidence to support that it followed the procurement policy. In addition, IW should establish internal controls to ensure documentation is maintained to evidence that it performed the required suspension and debarment searches on the SAM website.
Finding 2023-002: Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment (Material Weakness) Federal Program: Assistance Listing Number 14.267 Criterion or Specific Requirements: 2 CFR Section 200.318 requires that the non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. 2 CFR Section 200.214 requires that, for covered transactions, a non-Federal entity must verify that entities are not suspended, debarred or otherwise excluded. This verification may be accomplished by checking the System for Award Management (SAM) website maintained by the General Services Administration. Condition: IW has a formal written procurement policy, but it does not conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327, which is the Uniform Guidance. As a result, no procurement files were maintained to document IW's procurement actions. In addition, for all disbursements tested, IW could not provide documentation of their verification, prior to payment, that the vendors were not suspended, debarred or otherwise excluded. Questioned Costs: None. Cause: IW has not updated its written procurement policy to conform to the Uniform Guidance. In addition, IW did not require that evidence of SAM checks be maintained in its vendor files. As a result, IW did not maintain adequate support to provide evidence that appropriate suspension and debarment searches were performed. Despite the lack of documentation, a search was performed after the fact to verify that the vendors or individuals in our sample were not suspended, debarred or otherwise excluded. Therefore, no questioned costs have been reported related to the sample that was tested. Effect or Potential Effect: Without an updated procurement policy that conforms to the Uniform Guidance and related procurement documentation, there is a risk that IW did not perform a proper evaluation of each potential vendor whose costs were charged to Federal programs. In addition, IW could not readily provide evidence that it had assessed whether or not its vendors were suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. As a result, the potential for payments to suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded vendors and individuals exists. Recommendation: IW should revise its procurement policy so that it conforms to the Uniform Guidance. Furthermore, IW should maintain documentation in its files to provide evidence to support that it followed the procurement policy. In addition, IW should establish internal controls to ensure documentation is maintained to evidence that it performed the required suspension and debarment searches on the SAM website.
Criteria: Recipients are responsible for ensuring that any procurement using State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, or payments under procurement contracts using such funds, are consistent with the procurement standards set forth in the Uniform Guidance at 2 CFR 200.317 through 2 CFR 200.327. All contracts made by the non-Federal entity under the Federal award must contain the applicable provisions covering Davis Bacon Act. Condition: The City utilized a vendor from a state contract for public work in excess of $2,000 and did not execute a contract enumerating all required provisions. Cause: The City did not acquire the necessary certified payrolls. Effect: The City is not in compliance with the requirements of the awarding agency. Questioned Costs: None Context/Sampling: All contracts for public works were tested to ensure the necessary required provisions were included and that contractors and subcontractors submitted certified payrolls. The City did not acquire a contract for one project. Prior Year: None Recommendation: We recommend the City enhance internal controls to ensure that all purchases for goods and services under the federal award requiring a formal contract executes one. Client Response: The City recognizes the importance of internal controls and plans to enhance procedures to ensure that all purchases for goods and services under a federal award requiring a formal contract executes one. The City believes it is prudent such awards have a contract to support purchase orders. Covid interruptions with related illnesses, early retirements and hiring difficulties all contributed to the negative impact.
FINDING 2023-001 PROCUREMENT SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY Federal Program: Charter School Programs Assistance Listing Numbers: 84.282A Criteria Per 2 CFR 200.318, “The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §200.317 through 200.327.” Per 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2)(i) Small Purchase Procedures, “The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity.” Condition The School was unable to provide documentation to support that price comparisons were obtained from vendors for costs falling in the category of small purchases (between $10,000 and $249,999). Additionally, the School’s procedures manual did not include procedures for the handling of these transactions. Cause Documentation was not maintained to support that this step in the procurement process was completed. Effect Not documenting these procedures could result in the School completing procurement transactions not in compliance with Federal regulations. Recommendation We recommend the School develop procedures to ensure price comparisons are obtained and documented. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions The School’s Corrective Action Plan is included on page 23.
FINDING 2023-001 PROCUREMENT SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY Federal Program: Charter School Programs Assistance Listing Numbers: 84.282A Criteria Per 2 CFR 200.318, “The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §200.317 through 200.327.” Per 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2)(i) Small Purchase Procedures, “The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity.” Condition The School was unable to provide documentation to support that price comparisons were obtained from vendors for costs falling in the category of small purchases (between $10,000 and $249,999). Additionally, the School’s procedures manual did not include procedures for the handling of these transactions. Cause Documentation was not maintained to support that this step in the procurement process was completed. Effect Not documenting these procedures could result in the School completing procurement transactions not in compliance with Federal regulations. Recommendation We recommend the School develop procedures to ensure price comparisons are obtained and documented. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions The School’s Corrective Action Plan is included on page 23.
2023-015 Oregon Housing and Community Services Fully implement controls to ensure subrecipients are in compliance with program requirements Federal Awarding Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Assistance Listing Number and Name: 14.231 Emergency Solutions Grants Program (COVID-19) Federal Award Numbers and Years: E-20-DW-41-0001, 2020 (COVID-19) Compliance Requirements: Activities Allowed or Unallowed; Allowable Costs/Cost Principles; Equipment and Real Property Management; Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking; Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment, Special Tests and Provisions Type of Finding: Material Weakness Prior Year Findings: 2022-018, 2022-019, 2022-020, 2022-021, 2022-024 Questioned Costs: N/A Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303(a); 2 CFR 200.311; 2 CFR 200.313; 2 CFR 200.317 - .327; 24 CFR 576.100; 24 CFR 576.101(c); 24 CFR 576.102(c) The Emergency Solutions Grants (ESG/ESG-CV) program is operated by the department via pass-through funds to subrecipients. With the significant influx of pandemic relief funds, the department expanded the number of subrecipients partnered with from 17 longstanding community action agencies (CAAs) to a total of 45 CAA and non-CAA subrecipients. During fiscal year 2023, 98% of program expenditures were passed through to 40 of these subrecipients. Department management is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control that provides reasonable assurance program expenditures are in compliance with the terms and conditions of the federal award. However, the significant increases to federal funding the creation and implementation of a new award system for non-CAA recipients, and the increase in the number of subrecipients, along with a period of high employee turnover led to delays in the department’s development and implementation of sufficient subrecipient monitoring processes that would meet this objective. Department management subsequently contracted with a private auditing firm to assist in the monitoring of the program activities and expenditures of funds passed through to the subrecipients to remedy the noted control weaknesses. Department staff and the private auditing firm are currently working through the monitoring backlog. However, at the time of the audit, monitoring of only 16 of the 40 subrecipients had been completed which represents 58% of the fiscal year 2023 pass-through expenditures. Additionally, the completed monitoring was only performed over fiscal year 2022 expenditures as the department works to catch up on monitoring of prior year expenditures. Incomplete monitoring could lead to program noncompliance. We recommend department management complete the review and monitoring of program funds passed through to subrecipients for compliance with all applicable program requirements.
2023-016 Oregon Housing and Community Services Verification that subrecipients have not been suspended or debarred needs to be retained Federal Awarding Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Assistance Listing Number and Name: 14.231 Emergency Solutions Grants Program (COVID-19) Federal Award Numbers and Years: E-20-DW-41-0001, 2020 (COVID-19) Compliance Requirements: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Type of Finding: Material Weakness Prior Year Finding: 2022-022 Questioned Costs: N/A Criteria: 2 CFR 200.317 - .327 The prior-year audit noted that procurement processes were not followed. Specifically, evidence the department verified non-community action agencies receiving Emergency Solutions Grant Program and ESG-CV money were not suspended or debarred was not retained. During the audit, we attempted to review the suspension and debarment status of those entities that had received ESG and ESG-CV funds in 2023. We found the department did not retain evidence the suspension and debarment status of subrecipients was verified. Management stated this was due to the contracts being executed prior to fiscal year 2023. Due to employee turnover, it was unclear whether the verifications had not been performed or documentation had not been retained. Current procurement staff have since developed procedures to ensure future compliance with suspension and debarment requirements. We recommend department management perform and retain evidence of checks of suspension and debarment for all new and existing contracts.
2 CFR § 400.1 gives regulatory effect for the U.S. Department of Agriculture to the OMB guidance in 2 CFR § 200. 2 CFR § 200.317 - 200.327 requires entities to use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable State and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-Federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR 200.320(a)(1) and (2). Under the micro-purchase method, the aggregate dollar amount does not exceed $10,000 ($2,000 in the case of acquisition for construction subject to the Wage Rate Requirements (Davis-Bacon Act)). Small purchase procedures are used for purchases that exceed the micro-purchase amount but do not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold ($250,000). Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive quotations if the non-Federal entity considers the price to be reasonable (2 CFR 200.320(a)). If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources (2 CFR 200.320(b)). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-Federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR 200.320(b)(2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR 200.320(c). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR 200.324(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR 200.324(d)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The School District paid more than $250,000 to Valley Wholesale during fiscal year 2023 for food products for the Child Nutrition Cluster. This amount exceeded the simplified acquisition threshold thus the District should follow a formal competitive procurement method described in 2 CFR 200.320(b). However, the School District did not follow a formal procurement method because they chose to use this local vendor (Valley Wholesale) to allow them to get their fresh produce in a timely manner to avoid food waste. The School District did not have the proper internal controls in place to ensure proper bidding procedures were followed. Failure to have the appropriate controls in place may result in vendors being used that are not providing the best possible prices. The School District should follow their established procurement policies and federal guidelines when choosing all vendors for the Child Nutrition Cluster.
2 CFR § 400.1 gives regulatory effect for the U.S. Department of Agriculture to the OMB guidance in 2 CFR § 200. 2 CFR § 200.317 - 200.327 requires entities to use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable State and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-Federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR 200.320(a)(1) and (2). Under the micro-purchase method, the aggregate dollar amount does not exceed $10,000 ($2,000 in the case of acquisition for construction subject to the Wage Rate Requirements (Davis-Bacon Act)). Small purchase procedures are used for purchases that exceed the micro-purchase amount but do not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold ($250,000). Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive quotations if the non-Federal entity considers the price to be reasonable (2 CFR 200.320(a)). If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources (2 CFR 200.320(b)). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-Federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR 200.320(b)(2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR 200.320(c). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR 200.324(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR 200.324(d)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The School District paid more than $250,000 to Valley Wholesale during fiscal year 2023 for food products for the Child Nutrition Cluster. This amount exceeded the simplified acquisition threshold thus the District should follow a formal competitive procurement method described in 2 CFR 200.320(b). However, the School District did not follow a formal procurement method because they chose to use this local vendor (Valley Wholesale) to allow them to get their fresh produce in a timely manner to avoid food waste. The School District did not have the proper internal controls in place to ensure proper bidding procedures were followed. Failure to have the appropriate controls in place may result in vendors being used that are not providing the best possible prices. The School District should follow their established procurement policies and federal guidelines when choosing all vendors for the Child Nutrition Cluster.
2 CFR § 400.1 gives regulatory effect for the U.S. Department of Agriculture to the OMB guidance in 2 CFR § 200. 2 CFR § 200.317 - 200.327 requires entities to use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable State and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-Federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR 200.320(a)(1) and (2). Under the micro-purchase method, the aggregate dollar amount does not exceed $10,000 ($2,000 in the case of acquisition for construction subject to the Wage Rate Requirements (Davis-Bacon Act)). Small purchase procedures are used for purchases that exceed the micro-purchase amount but do not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold ($250,000). Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive quotations if the non-Federal entity considers the price to be reasonable (2 CFR 200.320(a)). If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources (2 CFR 200.320(b)). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-Federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR 200.320(b)(2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR 200.320(c). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR 200.324(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR 200.324(d)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The School District paid more than $250,000 to Valley Wholesale during fiscal year 2023 for food products for the Child Nutrition Cluster. This amount exceeded the simplified acquisition threshold thus the District should follow a formal competitive procurement method described in 2 CFR 200.320(b). However, the School District did not follow a formal procurement method because they chose to use this local vendor (Valley Wholesale) to allow them to get their fresh produce in a timely manner to avoid food waste. The School District did not have the proper internal controls in place to ensure proper bidding procedures were followed. Failure to have the appropriate controls in place may result in vendors being used that are not providing the best possible prices. The School District should follow their established procurement policies and federal guidelines when choosing all vendors for the Child Nutrition Cluster.
Federal Awarding Agency: USDA Impact: Significant Deficiency, Noncompliance AL Number and Title: 10.557 Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children Federal Award Number: 227AKAK7W1003, 227AKAK7W1006, 237AKAK7W1003, 237AKAK7W1006 Applicable Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Condition: For one of five procurement contracts selected for testing, the State could not provide documentation of the procurement method chosen and the procurement exceeded the threshold required for competitive bidding procedures. Context: The State is required to follow its own procurement policies and procedures as outlined in the Alaska Administrative Manual (AAM) Section AAM 81 “Procurement”. The Alaska Administrative Manual Section AAM 81.020 requires procurements more than $10,000 and less than $50,000 to involve obtaining at least three quotes or informal proposals. Cause: The vendor provided services that were previously under the micro-purchase threshold for procurement, which did not require competitive bidding procedures. The level of activity with the vendor increased and exceeded the threshold for competitive bidding procedures to be completed by the State. Criteria: 2 CFR, Part 200 – Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), Subpart C, §200.317 requires states to follow their procurement policies and procedures. Effect: It is important for the Department to obtain and maintain appropriate documentation to support procurement decisions. Otherwise, a procurement decision would be unsupported and could lead to questioned costs. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation: The State should provide training to employees to ensure that goods and services procured are done so in accordance with the State’s procurement policy. View of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with this finding.
Assistance Listing Number(s): 21.027 Name of Federal Program or Cluster: COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Name of Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Name of Pass-through Entity: City of Madison, City of Sun Prairie, Wisconsin Department of Workforce Development Award Period: January 1, 2022 through December 31, 2022; September 22, 2021 through December 31, 2024; June 20, 2022 through June 30, 2025 Criteria or Specific Requirement: 2 CFR section 200.318(a) requires a non-federal entity to have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with state, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.327. 2 CFR section 200.318(c)(1) requires a nonfederal entity to maintain written standards of conduct covering conflicts of interest and governing the actions of its employees engaged in the selection, award and administration of contracts. 2 CFR section 200.318(i) requires a non-federal entity to maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement including, but not limited to, the: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Condition and Context: There are no documented procurement procedures that meet the requirements of 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.327. While there is a conflict-of-interest policy, it does not specifically include standards of conduct covering conflicts of interest for procurement. There are no designed and implemented internal controls documented to ensure compliance with 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.327. For three significant transactions tested there were no documentation of the rationale for the method, documentation to support a required procurement method used, contractor selections or rejections, suspension and debarment, and bases for contract prices. The only support documented are the invoices. Total procurements were $482,904. Cause: The organization began charging procurement transactions in the current year to federal awards. The organization’s staff did not understand how to document the procurement history. Effect or Potential Effect: Questioned costs may be disallowed and required to be repaid. Questioned Costs: $365,501; total of the three significant transactions tested. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: The organization should develop and document procurement procedures that meet state, local, and Uniform Guidance requirements. The conflict-of-interest policy should be updated to include standards of conduct for those involved in procuring and to include organizational conflicts of interest. Internal controls should be designed, implemented, and documented within the procurement procedures to ensure compliance with 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.327. At a minimum, the procurement history including rationale for the method, procurement method support, contract selections and rejections, suspension and debarment, and bases for contract prices should be documented. Views of Responsible Officials: Boys and Girls Club of Dane County, Inc. agrees with the finding and is implementing procurement and conflict-of-interest policies.
Assistance Listing Number(s): 21.027 Name of Federal Program or Cluster: COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Name of Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Name of Pass-through Entity: City of Madison, City of Sun Prairie, Wisconsin Department of Workforce Development Award Period: January 1, 2022 through December 31, 2022; September 22, 2021 through December 31, 2024; June 20, 2022 through June 30, 2025 Criteria or Specific Requirement: 2 CFR section 200.318(a) requires a non-federal entity to have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with state, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.327. 2 CFR section 200.318(c)(1) requires a nonfederal entity to maintain written standards of conduct covering conflicts of interest and governing the actions of its employees engaged in the selection, award and administration of contracts. 2 CFR section 200.318(i) requires a non-federal entity to maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement including, but not limited to, the: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Condition and Context: There are no documented procurement procedures that meet the requirements of 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.327. While there is a conflict-of-interest policy, it does not specifically include standards of conduct covering conflicts of interest for procurement. There are no designed and implemented internal controls documented to ensure compliance with 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.327. For three significant transactions tested there were no documentation of the rationale for the method, documentation to support a required procurement method used, contractor selections or rejections, suspension and debarment, and bases for contract prices. The only support documented are the invoices. Total procurements were $482,904. Cause: The organization began charging procurement transactions in the current year to federal awards. The organization’s staff did not understand how to document the procurement history. Effect or Potential Effect: Questioned costs may be disallowed and required to be repaid. Questioned Costs: $365,501; total of the three significant transactions tested. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: The organization should develop and document procurement procedures that meet state, local, and Uniform Guidance requirements. The conflict-of-interest policy should be updated to include standards of conduct for those involved in procuring and to include organizational conflicts of interest. Internal controls should be designed, implemented, and documented within the procurement procedures to ensure compliance with 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.327. At a minimum, the procurement history including rationale for the method, procurement method support, contract selections and rejections, suspension and debarment, and bases for contract prices should be documented. Views of Responsible Officials: Boys and Girls Club of Dane County, Inc. agrees with the finding and is implementing procurement and conflict-of-interest policies.
Assistance Listing Number(s): 21.027 Name of Federal Program or Cluster: COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Name of Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Name of Pass-through Entity: City of Madison, City of Sun Prairie, Wisconsin Department of Workforce Development Award Period: January 1, 2022 through December 31, 2022; September 22, 2021 through December 31, 2024; June 20, 2022 through June 30, 2025 Criteria or Specific Requirement: 2 CFR section 200.318(a) requires a non-federal entity to have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with state, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.327. 2 CFR section 200.318(c)(1) requires a nonfederal entity to maintain written standards of conduct covering conflicts of interest and governing the actions of its employees engaged in the selection, award and administration of contracts. 2 CFR section 200.318(i) requires a non-federal entity to maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement including, but not limited to, the: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Condition and Context: There are no documented procurement procedures that meet the requirements of 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.327. While there is a conflict-of-interest policy, it does not specifically include standards of conduct covering conflicts of interest for procurement. There are no designed and implemented internal controls documented to ensure compliance with 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.327. For three significant transactions tested there were no documentation of the rationale for the method, documentation to support a required procurement method used, contractor selections or rejections, suspension and debarment, and bases for contract prices. The only support documented are the invoices. Total procurements were $482,904. Cause: The organization began charging procurement transactions in the current year to federal awards. The organization’s staff did not understand how to document the procurement history. Effect or Potential Effect: Questioned costs may be disallowed and required to be repaid. Questioned Costs: $365,501; total of the three significant transactions tested. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: The organization should develop and document procurement procedures that meet state, local, and Uniform Guidance requirements. The conflict-of-interest policy should be updated to include standards of conduct for those involved in procuring and to include organizational conflicts of interest. Internal controls should be designed, implemented, and documented within the procurement procedures to ensure compliance with 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.327. At a minimum, the procurement history including rationale for the method, procurement method support, contract selections and rejections, suspension and debarment, and bases for contract prices should be documented. Views of Responsible Officials: Boys and Girls Club of Dane County, Inc. agrees with the finding and is implementing procurement and conflict-of-interest policies.
Federal Assistance Number – Research and Development Cluster, Multiple Federal Grantors, Criteria or Specific Requirement – Procurement and Suspension and Debarment In accordance with 2 CFR Section 200.320, a non-federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures consistent with the standards of Sections 200.317 - 200.320. These standards include a micro-purchase threshold of $10,000 and policies for formal procurement and non competitive procurement. Additionally, in accordance with 2 CFR Section 180.220, when a non-federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the non-federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR Section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. Condition – The Institute's micro-purchase threshold of $25,000 included in the policy is in excess of 2 CFR Section 200.320, and the Institute is not eligible for the increase to the micro-purchase threshold. Formal procurement and non competitive procurement policies have been documented; however, formalized documentation supporting the Institute is in compliance with policies did not exist. Additionally, there was no suspension and debarment check completed prior to purchases made with federal funds. Questioned Costs – Total questioned costs of $45,000 were identified and represents value of equipment purchased for which the procurement process could not be supported in line with the Institute's policy and Uniform Guidance. Context – One purchase of $45,000 out of a total of three purchases totaling $152,986 subject to procurement requirements in 2023 was selected for testing. The Institute could not provide documentation supporting their purchase adhered to policies for formal procurement or non competitive procurement. Furthermore, a check of the vendor's suspension and debarment status prior to the purchase was not completed. The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Effect – Federal funds could be used to make an unauthorized purchase including paying an entity that is suspended or debarred. Cause – The Institute's procurement policies are not in accordance with the Uniform Guidance, nor are there controls in place to ensure policies are followed, and lastly, there are no controls to ensure suspension and debarment checks are performed on vendors receiving federal funds. Identification as a Repeat Finding, if applicable – Not a repeat finding. Recommendation – Policies and procedures should be modified to ensure that procurement policies and suspension and debarment checks on vendors are performed prior to making purchases with federal funds and are in alignment with the Uniform Guidance requirements. Views of Responsible Official and Planned Corrective Actions – Management agrees with the stated finding and has implemented a corrective action plan.
Federal Assistance Number – Research and Development Cluster, Multiple Federal Grantors, Criteria or Specific Requirement – Procurement and Suspension and Debarment In accordance with 2 CFR Section 200.320, a non-federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures consistent with the standards of Sections 200.317 - 200.320. These standards include a micro-purchase threshold of $10,000 and policies for formal procurement and non competitive procurement. Additionally, in accordance with 2 CFR Section 180.220, when a non-federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the non-federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR Section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. Condition – The Institute's micro-purchase threshold of $25,000 included in the policy is in excess of 2 CFR Section 200.320, and the Institute is not eligible for the increase to the micro-purchase threshold. Formal procurement and non competitive procurement policies have been documented; however, formalized documentation supporting the Institute is in compliance with policies did not exist. Additionally, there was no suspension and debarment check completed prior to purchases made with federal funds. Questioned Costs – Total questioned costs of $45,000 were identified and represents value of equipment purchased for which the procurement process could not be supported in line with the Institute's policy and Uniform Guidance. Context – One purchase of $45,000 out of a total of three purchases totaling $152,986 subject to procurement requirements in 2023 was selected for testing. The Institute could not provide documentation supporting their purchase adhered to policies for formal procurement or non competitive procurement. Furthermore, a check of the vendor's suspension and debarment status prior to the purchase was not completed. The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Effect – Federal funds could be used to make an unauthorized purchase including paying an entity that is suspended or debarred. Cause – The Institute's procurement policies are not in accordance with the Uniform Guidance, nor are there controls in place to ensure policies are followed, and lastly, there are no controls to ensure suspension and debarment checks are performed on vendors receiving federal funds. Identification as a Repeat Finding, if applicable – Not a repeat finding. Recommendation – Policies and procedures should be modified to ensure that procurement policies and suspension and debarment checks on vendors are performed prior to making purchases with federal funds and are in alignment with the Uniform Guidance requirements. Views of Responsible Official and Planned Corrective Actions – Management agrees with the stated finding and has implemented a corrective action plan.
Federal Assistance Number – Research and Development Cluster, Multiple Federal Grantors, Criteria or Specific Requirement – Procurement and Suspension and Debarment In accordance with 2 CFR Section 200.320, a non-federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures consistent with the standards of Sections 200.317 - 200.320. These standards include a micro-purchase threshold of $10,000 and policies for formal procurement and non competitive procurement. Additionally, in accordance with 2 CFR Section 180.220, when a non-federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the non-federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR Section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. Condition – The Institute's micro-purchase threshold of $25,000 included in the policy is in excess of 2 CFR Section 200.320, and the Institute is not eligible for the increase to the micro-purchase threshold. Formal procurement and non competitive procurement policies have been documented; however, formalized documentation supporting the Institute is in compliance with policies did not exist. Additionally, there was no suspension and debarment check completed prior to purchases made with federal funds. Questioned Costs – Total questioned costs of $45,000 were identified and represents value of equipment purchased for which the procurement process could not be supported in line with the Institute's policy and Uniform Guidance. Context – One purchase of $45,000 out of a total of three purchases totaling $152,986 subject to procurement requirements in 2023 was selected for testing. The Institute could not provide documentation supporting their purchase adhered to policies for formal procurement or non competitive procurement. Furthermore, a check of the vendor's suspension and debarment status prior to the purchase was not completed. The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Effect – Federal funds could be used to make an unauthorized purchase including paying an entity that is suspended or debarred. Cause – The Institute's procurement policies are not in accordance with the Uniform Guidance, nor are there controls in place to ensure policies are followed, and lastly, there are no controls to ensure suspension and debarment checks are performed on vendors receiving federal funds. Identification as a Repeat Finding, if applicable – Not a repeat finding. Recommendation – Policies and procedures should be modified to ensure that procurement policies and suspension and debarment checks on vendors are performed prior to making purchases with federal funds and are in alignment with the Uniform Guidance requirements. Views of Responsible Official and Planned Corrective Actions – Management agrees with the stated finding and has implemented a corrective action plan.
Federal Assistance Number – Research and Development Cluster, Multiple Federal Grantors, Criteria or Specific Requirement – Procurement and Suspension and Debarment In accordance with 2 CFR Section 200.320, a non-federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures consistent with the standards of Sections 200.317 - 200.320. These standards include a micro-purchase threshold of $10,000 and policies for formal procurement and non competitive procurement. Additionally, in accordance with 2 CFR Section 180.220, when a non-federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the non-federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR Section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. Condition – The Institute's micro-purchase threshold of $25,000 included in the policy is in excess of 2 CFR Section 200.320, and the Institute is not eligible for the increase to the micro-purchase threshold. Formal procurement and non competitive procurement policies have been documented; however, formalized documentation supporting the Institute is in compliance with policies did not exist. Additionally, there was no suspension and debarment check completed prior to purchases made with federal funds. Questioned Costs – Total questioned costs of $45,000 were identified and represents value of equipment purchased for which the procurement process could not be supported in line with the Institute's policy and Uniform Guidance. Context – One purchase of $45,000 out of a total of three purchases totaling $152,986 subject to procurement requirements in 2023 was selected for testing. The Institute could not provide documentation supporting their purchase adhered to policies for formal procurement or non competitive procurement. Furthermore, a check of the vendor's suspension and debarment status prior to the purchase was not completed. The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Effect – Federal funds could be used to make an unauthorized purchase including paying an entity that is suspended or debarred. Cause – The Institute's procurement policies are not in accordance with the Uniform Guidance, nor are there controls in place to ensure policies are followed, and lastly, there are no controls to ensure suspension and debarment checks are performed on vendors receiving federal funds. Identification as a Repeat Finding, if applicable – Not a repeat finding. Recommendation – Policies and procedures should be modified to ensure that procurement policies and suspension and debarment checks on vendors are performed prior to making purchases with federal funds and are in alignment with the Uniform Guidance requirements. Views of Responsible Official and Planned Corrective Actions – Management agrees with the stated finding and has implemented a corrective action plan.
Federal Assistance Number – Research and Development Cluster, Multiple Federal Grantors, Criteria or Specific Requirement – Procurement and Suspension and Debarment In accordance with 2 CFR Section 200.320, a non-federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures consistent with the standards of Sections 200.317 - 200.320. These standards include a micro-purchase threshold of $10,000 and policies for formal procurement and non competitive procurement. Additionally, in accordance with 2 CFR Section 180.220, when a non-federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the non-federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR Section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. Condition – The Institute's micro-purchase threshold of $25,000 included in the policy is in excess of 2 CFR Section 200.320, and the Institute is not eligible for the increase to the micro-purchase threshold. Formal procurement and non competitive procurement policies have been documented; however, formalized documentation supporting the Institute is in compliance with policies did not exist. Additionally, there was no suspension and debarment check completed prior to purchases made with federal funds. Questioned Costs – Total questioned costs of $45,000 were identified and represents value of equipment purchased for which the procurement process could not be supported in line with the Institute's policy and Uniform Guidance. Context – One purchase of $45,000 out of a total of three purchases totaling $152,986 subject to procurement requirements in 2023 was selected for testing. The Institute could not provide documentation supporting their purchase adhered to policies for formal procurement or non competitive procurement. Furthermore, a check of the vendor's suspension and debarment status prior to the purchase was not completed. The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Effect – Federal funds could be used to make an unauthorized purchase including paying an entity that is suspended or debarred. Cause – The Institute's procurement policies are not in accordance with the Uniform Guidance, nor are there controls in place to ensure policies are followed, and lastly, there are no controls to ensure suspension and debarment checks are performed on vendors receiving federal funds. Identification as a Repeat Finding, if applicable – Not a repeat finding. Recommendation – Policies and procedures should be modified to ensure that procurement policies and suspension and debarment checks on vendors are performed prior to making purchases with federal funds and are in alignment with the Uniform Guidance requirements. Views of Responsible Official and Planned Corrective Actions – Management agrees with the stated finding and has implemented a corrective action plan.
Federal Assistance Number – Research and Development Cluster, Multiple Federal Grantors, Criteria or Specific Requirement – Procurement and Suspension and Debarment In accordance with 2 CFR Section 200.320, a non-federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures consistent with the standards of Sections 200.317 - 200.320. These standards include a micro-purchase threshold of $10,000 and policies for formal procurement and non competitive procurement. Additionally, in accordance with 2 CFR Section 180.220, when a non-federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the non-federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR Section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. Condition – The Institute's micro-purchase threshold of $25,000 included in the policy is in excess of 2 CFR Section 200.320, and the Institute is not eligible for the increase to the micro-purchase threshold. Formal procurement and non competitive procurement policies have been documented; however, formalized documentation supporting the Institute is in compliance with policies did not exist. Additionally, there was no suspension and debarment check completed prior to purchases made with federal funds. Questioned Costs – Total questioned costs of $45,000 were identified and represents value of equipment purchased for which the procurement process could not be supported in line with the Institute's policy and Uniform Guidance. Context – One purchase of $45,000 out of a total of three purchases totaling $152,986 subject to procurement requirements in 2023 was selected for testing. The Institute could not provide documentation supporting their purchase adhered to policies for formal procurement or non competitive procurement. Furthermore, a check of the vendor's suspension and debarment status prior to the purchase was not completed. The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Effect – Federal funds could be used to make an unauthorized purchase including paying an entity that is suspended or debarred. Cause – The Institute's procurement policies are not in accordance with the Uniform Guidance, nor are there controls in place to ensure policies are followed, and lastly, there are no controls to ensure suspension and debarment checks are performed on vendors receiving federal funds. Identification as a Repeat Finding, if applicable – Not a repeat finding. Recommendation – Policies and procedures should be modified to ensure that procurement policies and suspension and debarment checks on vendors are performed prior to making purchases with federal funds and are in alignment with the Uniform Guidance requirements. Views of Responsible Official and Planned Corrective Actions – Management agrees with the stated finding and has implemented a corrective action plan.
Federal Assistance Number – Research and Development Cluster, Multiple Federal Grantors, Criteria or Specific Requirement – Procurement and Suspension and Debarment In accordance with 2 CFR Section 200.320, a non-federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures consistent with the standards of Sections 200.317 - 200.320. These standards include a micro-purchase threshold of $10,000 and policies for formal procurement and non competitive procurement. Additionally, in accordance with 2 CFR Section 180.220, when a non-federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the non-federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR Section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. Condition – The Institute's micro-purchase threshold of $25,000 included in the policy is in excess of 2 CFR Section 200.320, and the Institute is not eligible for the increase to the micro-purchase threshold. Formal procurement and non competitive procurement policies have been documented; however, formalized documentation supporting the Institute is in compliance with policies did not exist. Additionally, there was no suspension and debarment check completed prior to purchases made with federal funds. Questioned Costs – Total questioned costs of $45,000 were identified and represents value of equipment purchased for which the procurement process could not be supported in line with the Institute's policy and Uniform Guidance. Context – One purchase of $45,000 out of a total of three purchases totaling $152,986 subject to procurement requirements in 2023 was selected for testing. The Institute could not provide documentation supporting their purchase adhered to policies for formal procurement or non competitive procurement. Furthermore, a check of the vendor's suspension and debarment status prior to the purchase was not completed. The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Effect – Federal funds could be used to make an unauthorized purchase including paying an entity that is suspended or debarred. Cause – The Institute's procurement policies are not in accordance with the Uniform Guidance, nor are there controls in place to ensure policies are followed, and lastly, there are no controls to ensure suspension and debarment checks are performed on vendors receiving federal funds. Identification as a Repeat Finding, if applicable – Not a repeat finding. Recommendation – Policies and procedures should be modified to ensure that procurement policies and suspension and debarment checks on vendors are performed prior to making purchases with federal funds and are in alignment with the Uniform Guidance requirements. Views of Responsible Official and Planned Corrective Actions – Management agrees with the stated finding and has implemented a corrective action plan.
Federal Assistance Number – Research and Development Cluster, Multiple Federal Grantors, Criteria or Specific Requirement – Procurement and Suspension and Debarment In accordance with 2 CFR Section 200.320, a non-federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures consistent with the standards of Sections 200.317 - 200.320. These standards include a micro-purchase threshold of $10,000 and policies for formal procurement and non competitive procurement. Additionally, in accordance with 2 CFR Section 180.220, when a non-federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the non-federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR Section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. Condition – The Institute's micro-purchase threshold of $25,000 included in the policy is in excess of 2 CFR Section 200.320, and the Institute is not eligible for the increase to the micro-purchase threshold. Formal procurement and non competitive procurement policies have been documented; however, formalized documentation supporting the Institute is in compliance with policies did not exist. Additionally, there was no suspension and debarment check completed prior to purchases made with federal funds. Questioned Costs – Total questioned costs of $45,000 were identified and represents value of equipment purchased for which the procurement process could not be supported in line with the Institute's policy and Uniform Guidance. Context – One purchase of $45,000 out of a total of three purchases totaling $152,986 subject to procurement requirements in 2023 was selected for testing. The Institute could not provide documentation supporting their purchase adhered to policies for formal procurement or non competitive procurement. Furthermore, a check of the vendor's suspension and debarment status prior to the purchase was not completed. The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Effect – Federal funds could be used to make an unauthorized purchase including paying an entity that is suspended or debarred. Cause – The Institute's procurement policies are not in accordance with the Uniform Guidance, nor are there controls in place to ensure policies are followed, and lastly, there are no controls to ensure suspension and debarment checks are performed on vendors receiving federal funds. Identification as a Repeat Finding, if applicable – Not a repeat finding. Recommendation – Policies and procedures should be modified to ensure that procurement policies and suspension and debarment checks on vendors are performed prior to making purchases with federal funds and are in alignment with the Uniform Guidance requirements. Views of Responsible Official and Planned Corrective Actions – Management agrees with the stated finding and has implemented a corrective action plan.
Federal Assistance Number – Research and Development Cluster, Multiple Federal Grantors, Criteria or Specific Requirement – Procurement and Suspension and Debarment In accordance with 2 CFR Section 200.320, a non-federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures consistent with the standards of Sections 200.317 - 200.320. These standards include a micro-purchase threshold of $10,000 and policies for formal procurement and non competitive procurement. Additionally, in accordance with 2 CFR Section 180.220, when a non-federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the non-federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR Section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. Condition – The Institute's micro-purchase threshold of $25,000 included in the policy is in excess of 2 CFR Section 200.320, and the Institute is not eligible for the increase to the micro-purchase threshold. Formal procurement and non competitive procurement policies have been documented; however, formalized documentation supporting the Institute is in compliance with policies did not exist. Additionally, there was no suspension and debarment check completed prior to purchases made with federal funds. Questioned Costs – Total questioned costs of $45,000 were identified and represents value of equipment purchased for which the procurement process could not be supported in line with the Institute's policy and Uniform Guidance. Context – One purchase of $45,000 out of a total of three purchases totaling $152,986 subject to procurement requirements in 2023 was selected for testing. The Institute could not provide documentation supporting their purchase adhered to policies for formal procurement or non competitive procurement. Furthermore, a check of the vendor's suspension and debarment status prior to the purchase was not completed. The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Effect – Federal funds could be used to make an unauthorized purchase including paying an entity that is suspended or debarred. Cause – The Institute's procurement policies are not in accordance with the Uniform Guidance, nor are there controls in place to ensure policies are followed, and lastly, there are no controls to ensure suspension and debarment checks are performed on vendors receiving federal funds. Identification as a Repeat Finding, if applicable – Not a repeat finding. Recommendation – Policies and procedures should be modified to ensure that procurement policies and suspension and debarment checks on vendors are performed prior to making purchases with federal funds and are in alignment with the Uniform Guidance requirements. Views of Responsible Official and Planned Corrective Actions – Management agrees with the stated finding and has implemented a corrective action plan.
Federal Assistance Number – Research and Development Cluster, Multiple Federal Grantors, Criteria or Specific Requirement – Procurement and Suspension and Debarment In accordance with 2 CFR Section 200.320, a non-federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures consistent with the standards of Sections 200.317 - 200.320. These standards include a micro-purchase threshold of $10,000 and policies for formal procurement and non competitive procurement. Additionally, in accordance with 2 CFR Section 180.220, when a non-federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the non-federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR Section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. Condition – The Institute's micro-purchase threshold of $25,000 included in the policy is in excess of 2 CFR Section 200.320, and the Institute is not eligible for the increase to the micro-purchase threshold. Formal procurement and non competitive procurement policies have been documented; however, formalized documentation supporting the Institute is in compliance with policies did not exist. Additionally, there was no suspension and debarment check completed prior to purchases made with federal funds. Questioned Costs – Total questioned costs of $45,000 were identified and represents value of equipment purchased for which the procurement process could not be supported in line with the Institute's policy and Uniform Guidance. Context – One purchase of $45,000 out of a total of three purchases totaling $152,986 subject to procurement requirements in 2023 was selected for testing. The Institute could not provide documentation supporting their purchase adhered to policies for formal procurement or non competitive procurement. Furthermore, a check of the vendor's suspension and debarment status prior to the purchase was not completed. The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Effect – Federal funds could be used to make an unauthorized purchase including paying an entity that is suspended or debarred. Cause – The Institute's procurement policies are not in accordance with the Uniform Guidance, nor are there controls in place to ensure policies are followed, and lastly, there are no controls to ensure suspension and debarment checks are performed on vendors receiving federal funds. Identification as a Repeat Finding, if applicable – Not a repeat finding. Recommendation – Policies and procedures should be modified to ensure that procurement policies and suspension and debarment checks on vendors are performed prior to making purchases with federal funds and are in alignment with the Uniform Guidance requirements. Views of Responsible Official and Planned Corrective Actions – Management agrees with the stated finding and has implemented a corrective action plan.
Federal Assistance Number – Research and Development Cluster, Multiple Federal Grantors, Criteria or Specific Requirement – Procurement and Suspension and Debarment In accordance with 2 CFR Section 200.320, a non-federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures consistent with the standards of Sections 200.317 - 200.320. These standards include a micro-purchase threshold of $10,000 and policies for formal procurement and non competitive procurement. Additionally, in accordance with 2 CFR Section 180.220, when a non-federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the non-federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR Section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. Condition – The Institute's micro-purchase threshold of $25,000 included in the policy is in excess of 2 CFR Section 200.320, and the Institute is not eligible for the increase to the micro-purchase threshold. Formal procurement and non competitive procurement policies have been documented; however, formalized documentation supporting the Institute is in compliance with policies did not exist. Additionally, there was no suspension and debarment check completed prior to purchases made with federal funds. Questioned Costs – Total questioned costs of $45,000 were identified and represents value of equipment purchased for which the procurement process could not be supported in line with the Institute's policy and Uniform Guidance. Context – One purchase of $45,000 out of a total of three purchases totaling $152,986 subject to procurement requirements in 2023 was selected for testing. The Institute could not provide documentation supporting their purchase adhered to policies for formal procurement or non competitive procurement. Furthermore, a check of the vendor's suspension and debarment status prior to the purchase was not completed. The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Effect – Federal funds could be used to make an unauthorized purchase including paying an entity that is suspended or debarred. Cause – The Institute's procurement policies are not in accordance with the Uniform Guidance, nor are there controls in place to ensure policies are followed, and lastly, there are no controls to ensure suspension and debarment checks are performed on vendors receiving federal funds. Identification as a Repeat Finding, if applicable – Not a repeat finding. Recommendation – Policies and procedures should be modified to ensure that procurement policies and suspension and debarment checks on vendors are performed prior to making purchases with federal funds and are in alignment with the Uniform Guidance requirements. Views of Responsible Official and Planned Corrective Actions – Management agrees with the stated finding and has implemented a corrective action plan.
2023-004 – Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Federal agency: U.S. Treasury Federal program title: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Pass-Through Agency: City of Champaign, Illinois; Champaign County, Illinois; Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority Pass-Through Number(s): 20220246 - 2023; 20220245 - 2023; 822007 - 2023 Award Period: 3/1/22-12/31/23; 3/1/22-12/31/23; 3/1/22-12/31/24; 4/1/22-6/30/23 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Material Noncompliance Criteria or Specific Requirement: CFR § 200.320 indicates the various methods of procurement to be followed. The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and § 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the approved procurement methods used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. § 200.214 Suspension and debarment indicates non-Federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. Condition: The Organization did not have a procurement policy or suspension and debarment policy in place which was consistent with the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. As a result, the Organization could not provide supporting documentation showing that engaged vendors had gone through an appropriate procurement process. Questioned costs: N/A Context: 5 of 5 vendors selected for procurement testing, did not have documentation showing that the cost had been procured in accordance with the Uniform Guidance. Additionally, 2 of 2 vendors selected for testing suspension and debarment, did not have documentation showing that suspension and debarment had been checked prior to entering into a contract. Cause: Error by management in understanding Uniform Guidance requirements. Effect: Lack of appropriate procurement, suspension and debarment policies could result in the Organization engaging vendors who are debarred from doing business with the United States Government and/or using federal funds in manner that is not the most efficient or economical. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the Organization revised its internal controls related to procurement, suspension and debarment such that they align with the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Views of responsible officials: The Organization is in the process of developing a procurement policy and suspension and debarment policies that aligns with Uniform Guidance.
2023-004 – Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Federal agency: U.S. Treasury Federal program title: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Pass-Through Agency: City of Champaign, Illinois; Champaign County, Illinois; Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority Pass-Through Number(s): 20220246 - 2023; 20220245 - 2023; 822007 - 2023 Award Period: 3/1/22-12/31/23; 3/1/22-12/31/23; 3/1/22-12/31/24; 4/1/22-6/30/23 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Material Noncompliance Criteria or Specific Requirement: CFR § 200.320 indicates the various methods of procurement to be followed. The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and § 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the approved procurement methods used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. § 200.214 Suspension and debarment indicates non-Federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. Condition: The Organization did not have a procurement policy or suspension and debarment policy in place which was consistent with the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. As a result, the Organization could not provide supporting documentation showing that engaged vendors had gone through an appropriate procurement process. Questioned costs: N/A Context: 5 of 5 vendors selected for procurement testing, did not have documentation showing that the cost had been procured in accordance with the Uniform Guidance. Additionally, 2 of 2 vendors selected for testing suspension and debarment, did not have documentation showing that suspension and debarment had been checked prior to entering into a contract. Cause: Error by management in understanding Uniform Guidance requirements. Effect: Lack of appropriate procurement, suspension and debarment policies could result in the Organization engaging vendors who are debarred from doing business with the United States Government and/or using federal funds in manner that is not the most efficient or economical. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the Organization revised its internal controls related to procurement, suspension and debarment such that they align with the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Views of responsible officials: The Organization is in the process of developing a procurement policy and suspension and debarment policies that aligns with Uniform Guidance.
2023-004 – Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Federal agency: U.S. Treasury Federal program title: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Pass-Through Agency: City of Champaign, Illinois; Champaign County, Illinois; Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority Pass-Through Number(s): 20220246 - 2023; 20220245 - 2023; 822007 - 2023 Award Period: 3/1/22-12/31/23; 3/1/22-12/31/23; 3/1/22-12/31/24; 4/1/22-6/30/23 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Material Noncompliance Criteria or Specific Requirement: CFR § 200.320 indicates the various methods of procurement to be followed. The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and § 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the approved procurement methods used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. § 200.214 Suspension and debarment indicates non-Federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. Condition: The Organization did not have a procurement policy or suspension and debarment policy in place which was consistent with the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. As a result, the Organization could not provide supporting documentation showing that engaged vendors had gone through an appropriate procurement process. Questioned costs: N/A Context: 5 of 5 vendors selected for procurement testing, did not have documentation showing that the cost had been procured in accordance with the Uniform Guidance. Additionally, 2 of 2 vendors selected for testing suspension and debarment, did not have documentation showing that suspension and debarment had been checked prior to entering into a contract. Cause: Error by management in understanding Uniform Guidance requirements. Effect: Lack of appropriate procurement, suspension and debarment policies could result in the Organization engaging vendors who are debarred from doing business with the United States Government and/or using federal funds in manner that is not the most efficient or economical. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the Organization revised its internal controls related to procurement, suspension and debarment such that they align with the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Views of responsible officials: The Organization is in the process of developing a procurement policy and suspension and debarment policies that aligns with Uniform Guidance.
2023-004 – Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Federal agency: U.S. Treasury Federal program title: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Pass-Through Agency: City of Champaign, Illinois; Champaign County, Illinois; Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority Pass-Through Number(s): 20220246 - 2023; 20220245 - 2023; 822007 - 2023 Award Period: 3/1/22-12/31/23; 3/1/22-12/31/23; 3/1/22-12/31/24; 4/1/22-6/30/23 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Material Noncompliance Criteria or Specific Requirement: CFR § 200.320 indicates the various methods of procurement to be followed. The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and § 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the approved procurement methods used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. § 200.214 Suspension and debarment indicates non-Federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. Condition: The Organization did not have a procurement policy or suspension and debarment policy in place which was consistent with the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. As a result, the Organization could not provide supporting documentation showing that engaged vendors had gone through an appropriate procurement process. Questioned costs: N/A Context: 5 of 5 vendors selected for procurement testing, did not have documentation showing that the cost had been procured in accordance with the Uniform Guidance. Additionally, 2 of 2 vendors selected for testing suspension and debarment, did not have documentation showing that suspension and debarment had been checked prior to entering into a contract. Cause: Error by management in understanding Uniform Guidance requirements. Effect: Lack of appropriate procurement, suspension and debarment policies could result in the Organization engaging vendors who are debarred from doing business with the United States Government and/or using federal funds in manner that is not the most efficient or economical. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the Organization revised its internal controls related to procurement, suspension and debarment such that they align with the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Views of responsible officials: The Organization is in the process of developing a procurement policy and suspension and debarment policies that aligns with Uniform Guidance.
Finding 2023-013: U.S. Department of Transportation ALN #20.509, Formula Grants for Rural Areas (COVID-19) Grant #MT-2022-022-00 and MT-2023-011-00 Criteria: Federal regulation, 2 CFR 200.317, requires the Montana Department of Transportation (department) to follow state procurement policy when procuring property and services with federal funds. Federal regulation, 2 CFR 200.403, indicates costs must meet certain criteria to be allowable, such as being consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally and state financed activities of the department. Federal regulation, 2 CFR 200.332(d), requires the state to perform monitoring of subrecipients sufficient to ensure subrecipients have complied with federal requirements. Federal regulation, 2 CFR 200.313(d), requires the department to maintain accurate property records and have adequate internal controls to safeguard equipment purchased with federal funds. State policy in the Montana Operations Manual (MOM) policy requires all procurements either have a purchase order or contract. The purchase order or contract must include all elements negotiated and required for the purchase. Department policy and procedures require an inspection on each received vehicle be documented by a post-delivery certification. Federal regulation, 2 CFR 200.303, requires non-Federal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition: The department’s internal controls did not ensure vehicle procurement, funded by federal funds, followed state policy and procedures. Further, the department did not adequately review and monitor vehicle records to ensure compliance with federal requirements. Questioned Costs: We question $37,990 of costs charged to the program related to the vehicle purchase made without a contract. Context: In administering the Formula Grants for Rural Areas program, the department provides capital grants to subrecipients for purchase of equipment. The department utilizes a data processing system to obtain and store information from the subrecipients to assist in monitoring compliance with various requirements of the program. We reviewed the system information regarding equipment records, procurements, and subrecipient monitoring for the subrecipient’s equipment and procurement federal requirements. We sampled five of the department’s 15 vehicle purchases as part of our audit. This sample was not statistically valid. Our review identified: • Three purchases did not contain evidence of post-delivery certifications. • One purchase with inaccurate vehicle information in the system. • One purchase without a contract, totaling $37,990. The information maintained in the system is necessary to demonstrate compliance with federal procurement and equipment requirements. We analyzed the population of 127 vehicle records in the system and identified the records did not contain all the elements necessary to track and monitor vehicles purchased with federal funds properly. We conducted a sample of 23 vehicle records. The sample was not statistically valid. Our sample identified: • 11 vehicle records did not contain complete and accurate system information, including inaccurate VIN numbers and the condition of vehicle at time of inspection. • Three vehicles did not contain mileage reported. This information is used during the department’s biennial inspections of subrecipient fleet vehicles to determine reasonableness of mileage reimbursements. Repeat Finding: This is a repeat finding and was reported as Single Audit finding #2021-003 in the audit for the two fiscal years ended June 30, 2021. Effect: The department is not in compliance with state procurement policies and procedures. Additionally, the vehicle purchased without a contract resulted in questioned costs which the department may be required to repay to the federal government. Failure to complete post-delivery certifications may mean vehicles do not meet program specifications. Cause: The post-delivery certifications were overlooked by staff who completed the vehicle inspections at the time of delivery. Further, staff turnover and lack of necessary training contributed to the internal control deficiencies and noncompliance. Recommendation: We recommend the Montana Department of Transportation: A. Enhance internal controls and provide training to staff to ensure vehicle procurements follow state policy to comply with federal requirements. B. Enhance internal controls and provide training to staff to ensure information maintained in the system is complete and accurate. C. Comply with state procurement policy by using a contract agreement for all vehicle purchases. D. Complete and submit the post-delivery certifications, as required by department policy. E. Review and update the system vehicle records to ensure they are complete and accurate. Views of Responsible Officials: The department concurs with this recommendation. For additional information regarding the department’s planned corrective action see the Corrective Action Plan starting on page D-1.
Finding 2023-013: U.S. Department of Transportation ALN #20.509, Formula Grants for Rural Areas (COVID-19) Grant #MT-2022-022-00 and MT-2023-011-00 Criteria: Federal regulation, 2 CFR 200.317, requires the Montana Department of Transportation (department) to follow state procurement policy when procuring property and services with federal funds. Federal regulation, 2 CFR 200.403, indicates costs must meet certain criteria to be allowable, such as being consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally and state financed activities of the department. Federal regulation, 2 CFR 200.332(d), requires the state to perform monitoring of subrecipients sufficient to ensure subrecipients have complied with federal requirements. Federal regulation, 2 CFR 200.313(d), requires the department to maintain accurate property records and have adequate internal controls to safeguard equipment purchased with federal funds. State policy in the Montana Operations Manual (MOM) policy requires all procurements either have a purchase order or contract. The purchase order or contract must include all elements negotiated and required for the purchase. Department policy and procedures require an inspection on each received vehicle be documented by a post-delivery certification. Federal regulation, 2 CFR 200.303, requires non-Federal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition: The department’s internal controls did not ensure vehicle procurement, funded by federal funds, followed state policy and procedures. Further, the department did not adequately review and monitor vehicle records to ensure compliance with federal requirements. Questioned Costs: We question $37,990 of costs charged to the program related to the vehicle purchase made without a contract. Context: In administering the Formula Grants for Rural Areas program, the department provides capital grants to subrecipients for purchase of equipment. The department utilizes a data processing system to obtain and store information from the subrecipients to assist in monitoring compliance with various requirements of the program. We reviewed the system information regarding equipment records, procurements, and subrecipient monitoring for the subrecipient’s equipment and procurement federal requirements. We sampled five of the department’s 15 vehicle purchases as part of our audit. This sample was not statistically valid. Our review identified: • Three purchases did not contain evidence of post-delivery certifications. • One purchase with inaccurate vehicle information in the system. • One purchase without a contract, totaling $37,990. The information maintained in the system is necessary to demonstrate compliance with federal procurement and equipment requirements. We analyzed the population of 127 vehicle records in the system and identified the records did not contain all the elements necessary to track and monitor vehicles purchased with federal funds properly. We conducted a sample of 23 vehicle records. The sample was not statistically valid. Our sample identified: • 11 vehicle records did not contain complete and accurate system information, including inaccurate VIN numbers and the condition of vehicle at time of inspection. • Three vehicles did not contain mileage reported. This information is used during the department’s biennial inspections of subrecipient fleet vehicles to determine reasonableness of mileage reimbursements. Repeat Finding: This is a repeat finding and was reported as Single Audit finding #2021-003 in the audit for the two fiscal years ended June 30, 2021. Effect: The department is not in compliance with state procurement policies and procedures. Additionally, the vehicle purchased without a contract resulted in questioned costs which the department may be required to repay to the federal government. Failure to complete post-delivery certifications may mean vehicles do not meet program specifications. Cause: The post-delivery certifications were overlooked by staff who completed the vehicle inspections at the time of delivery. Further, staff turnover and lack of necessary training contributed to the internal control deficiencies and noncompliance. Recommendation: We recommend the Montana Department of Transportation: A. Enhance internal controls and provide training to staff to ensure vehicle procurements follow state policy to comply with federal requirements. B. Enhance internal controls and provide training to staff to ensure information maintained in the system is complete and accurate. C. Comply with state procurement policy by using a contract agreement for all vehicle purchases. D. Complete and submit the post-delivery certifications, as required by department policy. E. Review and update the system vehicle records to ensure they are complete and accurate. Views of Responsible Officials: The department concurs with this recommendation. For additional information regarding the department’s planned corrective action see the Corrective Action Plan starting on page D-1.
Finding 2023-013: U.S. Department of Transportation ALN #20.509, Formula Grants for Rural Areas (COVID-19) Grant #MT-2022-022-00 and MT-2023-011-00 Criteria: Federal regulation, 2 CFR 200.317, requires the Montana Department of Transportation (department) to follow state procurement policy when procuring property and services with federal funds. Federal regulation, 2 CFR 200.403, indicates costs must meet certain criteria to be allowable, such as being consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally and state financed activities of the department. Federal regulation, 2 CFR 200.332(d), requires the state to perform monitoring of subrecipients sufficient to ensure subrecipients have complied with federal requirements. Federal regulation, 2 CFR 200.313(d), requires the department to maintain accurate property records and have adequate internal controls to safeguard equipment purchased with federal funds. State policy in the Montana Operations Manual (MOM) policy requires all procurements either have a purchase order or contract. The purchase order or contract must include all elements negotiated and required for the purchase. Department policy and procedures require an inspection on each received vehicle be documented by a post-delivery certification. Federal regulation, 2 CFR 200.303, requires non-Federal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition: The department’s internal controls did not ensure vehicle procurement, funded by federal funds, followed state policy and procedures. Further, the department did not adequately review and monitor vehicle records to ensure compliance with federal requirements. Questioned Costs: We question $37,990 of costs charged to the program related to the vehicle purchase made without a contract. Context: In administering the Formula Grants for Rural Areas program, the department provides capital grants to subrecipients for purchase of equipment. The department utilizes a data processing system to obtain and store information from the subrecipients to assist in monitoring compliance with various requirements of the program. We reviewed the system information regarding equipment records, procurements, and subrecipient monitoring for the subrecipient’s equipment and procurement federal requirements. We sampled five of the department’s 15 vehicle purchases as part of our audit. This sample was not statistically valid. Our review identified: • Three purchases did not contain evidence of post-delivery certifications. • One purchase with inaccurate vehicle information in the system. • One purchase without a contract, totaling $37,990. The information maintained in the system is necessary to demonstrate compliance with federal procurement and equipment requirements. We analyzed the population of 127 vehicle records in the system and identified the records did not contain all the elements necessary to track and monitor vehicles purchased with federal funds properly. We conducted a sample of 23 vehicle records. The sample was not statistically valid. Our sample identified: • 11 vehicle records did not contain complete and accurate system information, including inaccurate VIN numbers and the condition of vehicle at time of inspection. • Three vehicles did not contain mileage reported. This information is used during the department’s biennial inspections of subrecipient fleet vehicles to determine reasonableness of mileage reimbursements. Repeat Finding: This is a repeat finding and was reported as Single Audit finding #2021-003 in the audit for the two fiscal years ended June 30, 2021. Effect: The department is not in compliance with state procurement policies and procedures. Additionally, the vehicle purchased without a contract resulted in questioned costs which the department may be required to repay to the federal government. Failure to complete post-delivery certifications may mean vehicles do not meet program specifications. Cause: The post-delivery certifications were overlooked by staff who completed the vehicle inspections at the time of delivery. Further, staff turnover and lack of necessary training contributed to the internal control deficiencies and noncompliance. Recommendation: We recommend the Montana Department of Transportation: A. Enhance internal controls and provide training to staff to ensure vehicle procurements follow state policy to comply with federal requirements. B. Enhance internal controls and provide training to staff to ensure information maintained in the system is complete and accurate. C. Comply with state procurement policy by using a contract agreement for all vehicle purchases. D. Complete and submit the post-delivery certifications, as required by department policy. E. Review and update the system vehicle records to ensure they are complete and accurate. Views of Responsible Officials: The department concurs with this recommendation. For additional information regarding the department’s planned corrective action see the Corrective Action Plan starting on page D-1.
Finding 2023-013: U.S. Department of Transportation ALN #20.509, Formula Grants for Rural Areas (COVID-19) Grant #MT-2022-022-00 and MT-2023-011-00 Criteria: Federal regulation, 2 CFR 200.317, requires the Montana Department of Transportation (department) to follow state procurement policy when procuring property and services with federal funds. Federal regulation, 2 CFR 200.403, indicates costs must meet certain criteria to be allowable, such as being consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally and state financed activities of the department. Federal regulation, 2 CFR 200.332(d), requires the state to perform monitoring of subrecipients sufficient to ensure subrecipients have complied with federal requirements. Federal regulation, 2 CFR 200.313(d), requires the department to maintain accurate property records and have adequate internal controls to safeguard equipment purchased with federal funds. State policy in the Montana Operations Manual (MOM) policy requires all procurements either have a purchase order or contract. The purchase order or contract must include all elements negotiated and required for the purchase. Department policy and procedures require an inspection on each received vehicle be documented by a post-delivery certification. Federal regulation, 2 CFR 200.303, requires non-Federal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition: The department’s internal controls did not ensure vehicle procurement, funded by federal funds, followed state policy and procedures. Further, the department did not adequately review and monitor vehicle records to ensure compliance with federal requirements. Questioned Costs: We question $37,990 of costs charged to the program related to the vehicle purchase made without a contract. Context: In administering the Formula Grants for Rural Areas program, the department provides capital grants to subrecipients for purchase of equipment. The department utilizes a data processing system to obtain and store information from the subrecipients to assist in monitoring compliance with various requirements of the program. We reviewed the system information regarding equipment records, procurements, and subrecipient monitoring for the subrecipient’s equipment and procurement federal requirements. We sampled five of the department’s 15 vehicle purchases as part of our audit. This sample was not statistically valid. Our review identified: • Three purchases did not contain evidence of post-delivery certifications. • One purchase with inaccurate vehicle information in the system. • One purchase without a contract, totaling $37,990. The information maintained in the system is necessary to demonstrate compliance with federal procurement and equipment requirements. We analyzed the population of 127 vehicle records in the system and identified the records did not contain all the elements necessary to track and monitor vehicles purchased with federal funds properly. We conducted a sample of 23 vehicle records. The sample was not statistically valid. Our sample identified: • 11 vehicle records did not contain complete and accurate system information, including inaccurate VIN numbers and the condition of vehicle at time of inspection. • Three vehicles did not contain mileage reported. This information is used during the department’s biennial inspections of subrecipient fleet vehicles to determine reasonableness of mileage reimbursements. Repeat Finding: This is a repeat finding and was reported as Single Audit finding #2021-003 in the audit for the two fiscal years ended June 30, 2021. Effect: The department is not in compliance with state procurement policies and procedures. Additionally, the vehicle purchased without a contract resulted in questioned costs which the department may be required to repay to the federal government. Failure to complete post-delivery certifications may mean vehicles do not meet program specifications. Cause: The post-delivery certifications were overlooked by staff who completed the vehicle inspections at the time of delivery. Further, staff turnover and lack of necessary training contributed to the internal control deficiencies and noncompliance. Recommendation: We recommend the Montana Department of Transportation: A. Enhance internal controls and provide training to staff to ensure vehicle procurements follow state policy to comply with federal requirements. B. Enhance internal controls and provide training to staff to ensure information maintained in the system is complete and accurate. C. Comply with state procurement policy by using a contract agreement for all vehicle purchases. D. Complete and submit the post-delivery certifications, as required by department policy. E. Review and update the system vehicle records to ensure they are complete and accurate. Views of Responsible Officials: The department concurs with this recommendation. For additional information regarding the department’s planned corrective action see the Corrective Action Plan starting on page D-1.
FINDING 2023-001 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, COVID-19 - Special Education Grants to States; Special Education Preschool Grants; COVID-19 - Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.027X, 84.173, 84.173X Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 22611-034-PN01, 23611-034-PN01, 22611-034-ARP, 21619-034-PN01; 22619-034-PN01, 23619-034-PN01, 22619-034-ARP Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2022-002. Condition and Context Procurement - Small Purchases Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000 unless a lower, more restrictive threshold is set by a nonfederal entity. As Indiana Code has set a more restrictive threshold of $150,000, the informal procurement method is permitted when the value of the procurement does not exceed $150,000. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. A total of 23 vendor claims were determined to require small purchase procedures. Of the vendor claims, totaling $113,815, 4 were selected for testing. For the 4 vendor claims tested, the School Corporation did not obtain an adequate number of price or rate quotations nor was its documentation detailing the history of procurement, which must include the reason for the procurement method used. Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with federal award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the SAM exclusions, collecting a certification from that person, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 18 METROPOLITAN SCHOOL DISTRICT OF LAWRENCE TOWNSHIP SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Upon inquiry of the School Corporation, it was determined that the School Corporation ensures all service contracts include a provision regarding suspension and debarment. The contracts are reviewed and signed by a knowledgeable member of the School Corporation. A population of eight covered transactions for goods or services that equaled or exceeded $25,000 paid from SPED funds during the audit period was identified. A sample of two transactions, totaling $178,915, was selected for testing. For both transactions, the School Corporation did not verify the vendors' suspension and debarment status prior to payment. The lack of effective internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the "Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318 states in part: "(a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. . . . (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. . . ." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use document procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 19 METROPOLITAN SCHOOL DISTRICT OF LAWRENCE TOWNSHIP SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (2) Small purchases– (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation, which would include segregation of key functions. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, procurement procedures for goods and services were not adhered to, and vendors to whom payments equal to or in excess of $25,000 were not verified to be not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure there are appropriate procurement procedures for goods and services and contractors and subrecipients, as appropriate, are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded prior to entering into any contracts or subawards. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2023-001 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, COVID-19 - Special Education Grants to States; Special Education Preschool Grants; COVID-19 - Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.027X, 84.173, 84.173X Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 22611-034-PN01, 23611-034-PN01, 22611-034-ARP, 21619-034-PN01; 22619-034-PN01, 23619-034-PN01, 22619-034-ARP Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2022-002. Condition and Context Procurement - Small Purchases Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000 unless a lower, more restrictive threshold is set by a nonfederal entity. As Indiana Code has set a more restrictive threshold of $150,000, the informal procurement method is permitted when the value of the procurement does not exceed $150,000. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. A total of 23 vendor claims were determined to require small purchase procedures. Of the vendor claims, totaling $113,815, 4 were selected for testing. For the 4 vendor claims tested, the School Corporation did not obtain an adequate number of price or rate quotations nor was its documentation detailing the history of procurement, which must include the reason for the procurement method used. Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with federal award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the SAM exclusions, collecting a certification from that person, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 18 METROPOLITAN SCHOOL DISTRICT OF LAWRENCE TOWNSHIP SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Upon inquiry of the School Corporation, it was determined that the School Corporation ensures all service contracts include a provision regarding suspension and debarment. The contracts are reviewed and signed by a knowledgeable member of the School Corporation. A population of eight covered transactions for goods or services that equaled or exceeded $25,000 paid from SPED funds during the audit period was identified. A sample of two transactions, totaling $178,915, was selected for testing. For both transactions, the School Corporation did not verify the vendors' suspension and debarment status prior to payment. The lack of effective internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the "Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318 states in part: "(a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. . . . (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. . . ." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use document procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 19 METROPOLITAN SCHOOL DISTRICT OF LAWRENCE TOWNSHIP SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (2) Small purchases– (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation, which would include segregation of key functions. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, procurement procedures for goods and services were not adhered to, and vendors to whom payments equal to or in excess of $25,000 were not verified to be not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure there are appropriate procurement procedures for goods and services and contractors and subrecipients, as appropriate, are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded prior to entering into any contracts or subawards. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2023-001 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, COVID-19 - Special Education Grants to States; Special Education Preschool Grants; COVID-19 - Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.027X, 84.173, 84.173X Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 22611-034-PN01, 23611-034-PN01, 22611-034-ARP, 21619-034-PN01; 22619-034-PN01, 23619-034-PN01, 22619-034-ARP Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2022-002. Condition and Context Procurement - Small Purchases Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000 unless a lower, more restrictive threshold is set by a nonfederal entity. As Indiana Code has set a more restrictive threshold of $150,000, the informal procurement method is permitted when the value of the procurement does not exceed $150,000. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. A total of 23 vendor claims were determined to require small purchase procedures. Of the vendor claims, totaling $113,815, 4 were selected for testing. For the 4 vendor claims tested, the School Corporation did not obtain an adequate number of price or rate quotations nor was its documentation detailing the history of procurement, which must include the reason for the procurement method used. Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with federal award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the SAM exclusions, collecting a certification from that person, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 18 METROPOLITAN SCHOOL DISTRICT OF LAWRENCE TOWNSHIP SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Upon inquiry of the School Corporation, it was determined that the School Corporation ensures all service contracts include a provision regarding suspension and debarment. The contracts are reviewed and signed by a knowledgeable member of the School Corporation. A population of eight covered transactions for goods or services that equaled or exceeded $25,000 paid from SPED funds during the audit period was identified. A sample of two transactions, totaling $178,915, was selected for testing. For both transactions, the School Corporation did not verify the vendors' suspension and debarment status prior to payment. The lack of effective internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the "Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318 states in part: "(a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. . . . (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. . . ." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use document procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 19 METROPOLITAN SCHOOL DISTRICT OF LAWRENCE TOWNSHIP SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (2) Small purchases– (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation, which would include segregation of key functions. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, procurement procedures for goods and services were not adhered to, and vendors to whom payments equal to or in excess of $25,000 were not verified to be not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure there are appropriate procurement procedures for goods and services and contractors and subrecipients, as appropriate, are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded prior to entering into any contracts or subawards. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2023-001 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, COVID-19 - Special Education Grants to States; Special Education Preschool Grants; COVID-19 - Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.027X, 84.173, 84.173X Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 22611-034-PN01, 23611-034-PN01, 22611-034-ARP, 21619-034-PN01; 22619-034-PN01, 23619-034-PN01, 22619-034-ARP Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2022-002. Condition and Context Procurement - Small Purchases Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000 unless a lower, more restrictive threshold is set by a nonfederal entity. As Indiana Code has set a more restrictive threshold of $150,000, the informal procurement method is permitted when the value of the procurement does not exceed $150,000. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. A total of 23 vendor claims were determined to require small purchase procedures. Of the vendor claims, totaling $113,815, 4 were selected for testing. For the 4 vendor claims tested, the School Corporation did not obtain an adequate number of price or rate quotations nor was its documentation detailing the history of procurement, which must include the reason for the procurement method used. Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with federal award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the SAM exclusions, collecting a certification from that person, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 18 METROPOLITAN SCHOOL DISTRICT OF LAWRENCE TOWNSHIP SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Upon inquiry of the School Corporation, it was determined that the School Corporation ensures all service contracts include a provision regarding suspension and debarment. The contracts are reviewed and signed by a knowledgeable member of the School Corporation. A population of eight covered transactions for goods or services that equaled or exceeded $25,000 paid from SPED funds during the audit period was identified. A sample of two transactions, totaling $178,915, was selected for testing. For both transactions, the School Corporation did not verify the vendors' suspension and debarment status prior to payment. The lack of effective internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the "Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318 states in part: "(a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. . . . (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. . . ." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use document procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 19 METROPOLITAN SCHOOL DISTRICT OF LAWRENCE TOWNSHIP SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (2) Small purchases– (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation, which would include segregation of key functions. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, procurement procedures for goods and services were not adhered to, and vendors to whom payments equal to or in excess of $25,000 were not verified to be not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure there are appropriate procurement procedures for goods and services and contractors and subrecipients, as appropriate, are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded prior to entering into any contracts or subawards. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2023-004 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY2022, FY2023 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context The School Corporation had not properly designed or implemented a system of internal controls, which would include appropriate segregation of duties, that would likely be effective in preventing, or detecting and correcting, noncompliance related to the purchase of goods and services that fell within the small purchase threshold or were considered covered transactions. Procurement Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000 unless a lower, more restrictive threshold is set by a non-federal entity. As Indiana Code has set a more restrictive threshold of $150,000, informal procurement methods are permitted when the value of the procurement does not exceed $150,000. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds: Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. The School Corporation had not designed or implemented internal controls, which would consist of policies and procedures, to ensure that proper procurement procedures for small purchases were followed. A population of eight small purchase vendors was identified. All eight were selected for testing. For all eight small purchases, totaling $180,015, the School Corporation did not obtain price or rate quotes. Documentation detailing the history of procurement, which must include the reason for the procurement method used, was not available for audit. Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with federal award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the SAMs exclusions, collecting a certification from that vendor, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that vendor. The School Corporation had not designed or implemented internal controls, which would consist of policies and procedures, to ensure that vendors were not suspended or debarred prior to entering into a covered transaction. One covered transaction that equaled or exceeded $25,000 was identified and selected for testing. Payments to the vendor, totaling $81,295, were made without verifying if the vendor was suspended, debarred or otherwise excluded from participation in federal awards. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The Non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use document procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases – (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed and implemented by management of the School Corporation, which would include segregation of key functions. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, price or rate quotes were not obtained for small purchases and vendors to whom payments equal to or in excess of $25,000 were not verified to be not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure rate or price quotes are obtained for small purchases and ensure contractors and subrecipients, as appropriate are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded prior to entering into any contracts or subawards. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2023-004 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY2022, FY2023 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context The School Corporation had not properly designed or implemented a system of internal controls, which would include appropriate segregation of duties, that would likely be effective in preventing, or detecting and correcting, noncompliance related to the purchase of goods and services that fell within the small purchase threshold or were considered covered transactions. Procurement Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000 unless a lower, more restrictive threshold is set by a non-federal entity. As Indiana Code has set a more restrictive threshold of $150,000, informal procurement methods are permitted when the value of the procurement does not exceed $150,000. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds: Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. The School Corporation had not designed or implemented internal controls, which would consist of policies and procedures, to ensure that proper procurement procedures for small purchases were followed. A population of eight small purchase vendors was identified. All eight were selected for testing. For all eight small purchases, totaling $180,015, the School Corporation did not obtain price or rate quotes. Documentation detailing the history of procurement, which must include the reason for the procurement method used, was not available for audit. Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with federal award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the SAMs exclusions, collecting a certification from that vendor, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that vendor. The School Corporation had not designed or implemented internal controls, which would consist of policies and procedures, to ensure that vendors were not suspended or debarred prior to entering into a covered transaction. One covered transaction that equaled or exceeded $25,000 was identified and selected for testing. Payments to the vendor, totaling $81,295, were made without verifying if the vendor was suspended, debarred or otherwise excluded from participation in federal awards. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The Non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use document procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases – (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed and implemented by management of the School Corporation, which would include segregation of key functions. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, price or rate quotes were not obtained for small purchases and vendors to whom payments equal to or in excess of $25,000 were not verified to be not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure rate or price quotes are obtained for small purchases and ensure contractors and subrecipients, as appropriate are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded prior to entering into any contracts or subawards. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2023-004 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY2022, FY2023 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context The School Corporation had not properly designed or implemented a system of internal controls, which would include appropriate segregation of duties, that would likely be effective in preventing, or detecting and correcting, noncompliance related to the purchase of goods and services that fell within the small purchase threshold or were considered covered transactions. Procurement Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000 unless a lower, more restrictive threshold is set by a non-federal entity. As Indiana Code has set a more restrictive threshold of $150,000, informal procurement methods are permitted when the value of the procurement does not exceed $150,000. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds: Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. The School Corporation had not designed or implemented internal controls, which would consist of policies and procedures, to ensure that proper procurement procedures for small purchases were followed. A population of eight small purchase vendors was identified. All eight were selected for testing. For all eight small purchases, totaling $180,015, the School Corporation did not obtain price or rate quotes. Documentation detailing the history of procurement, which must include the reason for the procurement method used, was not available for audit. Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with federal award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the SAMs exclusions, collecting a certification from that vendor, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that vendor. The School Corporation had not designed or implemented internal controls, which would consist of policies and procedures, to ensure that vendors were not suspended or debarred prior to entering into a covered transaction. One covered transaction that equaled or exceeded $25,000 was identified and selected for testing. Payments to the vendor, totaling $81,295, were made without verifying if the vendor was suspended, debarred or otherwise excluded from participation in federal awards. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The Non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use document procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases – (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed and implemented by management of the School Corporation, which would include segregation of key functions. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, price or rate quotes were not obtained for small purchases and vendors to whom payments equal to or in excess of $25,000 were not verified to be not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure rate or price quotes are obtained for small purchases and ensure contractors and subrecipients, as appropriate are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded prior to entering into any contracts or subawards. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2023-004 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY2022, FY2023 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context The School Corporation had not properly designed or implemented a system of internal controls, which would include appropriate segregation of duties, that would likely be effective in preventing, or detecting and correcting, noncompliance related to the purchase of goods and services that fell within the small purchase threshold or were considered covered transactions. Procurement Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000 unless a lower, more restrictive threshold is set by a non-federal entity. As Indiana Code has set a more restrictive threshold of $150,000, informal procurement methods are permitted when the value of the procurement does not exceed $150,000. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds: Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. The School Corporation had not designed or implemented internal controls, which would consist of policies and procedures, to ensure that proper procurement procedures for small purchases were followed. A population of eight small purchase vendors was identified. All eight were selected for testing. For all eight small purchases, totaling $180,015, the School Corporation did not obtain price or rate quotes. Documentation detailing the history of procurement, which must include the reason for the procurement method used, was not available for audit. Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with federal award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the SAMs exclusions, collecting a certification from that vendor, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that vendor. The School Corporation had not designed or implemented internal controls, which would consist of policies and procedures, to ensure that vendors were not suspended or debarred prior to entering into a covered transaction. One covered transaction that equaled or exceeded $25,000 was identified and selected for testing. Payments to the vendor, totaling $81,295, were made without verifying if the vendor was suspended, debarred or otherwise excluded from participation in federal awards. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The Non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use document procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases – (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed and implemented by management of the School Corporation, which would include segregation of key functions. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, price or rate quotes were not obtained for small purchases and vendors to whom payments equal to or in excess of $25,000 were not verified to be not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure rate or price quotes are obtained for small purchases and ensure contractors and subrecipients, as appropriate are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded prior to entering into any contracts or subawards. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2023-004 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY2022, FY2023 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context The School Corporation had not properly designed or implemented a system of internal controls, which would include appropriate segregation of duties, that would likely be effective in preventing, or detecting and correcting, noncompliance related to the purchase of goods and services that fell within the small purchase threshold or were considered covered transactions. Procurement Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000 unless a lower, more restrictive threshold is set by a non-federal entity. As Indiana Code has set a more restrictive threshold of $150,000, informal procurement methods are permitted when the value of the procurement does not exceed $150,000. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds: Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. The School Corporation had not designed or implemented internal controls, which would consist of policies and procedures, to ensure that proper procurement procedures for small purchases were followed. A population of eight small purchase vendors was identified. All eight were selected for testing. For all eight small purchases, totaling $180,015, the School Corporation did not obtain price or rate quotes. Documentation detailing the history of procurement, which must include the reason for the procurement method used, was not available for audit. Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with federal award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the SAMs exclusions, collecting a certification from that vendor, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that vendor. The School Corporation had not designed or implemented internal controls, which would consist of policies and procedures, to ensure that vendors were not suspended or debarred prior to entering into a covered transaction. One covered transaction that equaled or exceeded $25,000 was identified and selected for testing. Payments to the vendor, totaling $81,295, were made without verifying if the vendor was suspended, debarred or otherwise excluded from participation in federal awards. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The Non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use document procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases – (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed and implemented by management of the School Corporation, which would include segregation of key functions. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, price or rate quotes were not obtained for small purchases and vendors to whom payments equal to or in excess of $25,000 were not verified to be not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure rate or price quotes are obtained for small purchases and ensure contractors and subrecipients, as appropriate are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded prior to entering into any contracts or subawards. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2023-003 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Procurement Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Special Education Grants to States Assistance Listings Number: 84.027 Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): H027A190084 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000 unless a lower, more restrictive threshold is set by a non-Federal entity. As Indiana Code has set a more restrictive threshold of $150,000, informal procurement methods are permitted when the value of the procurement does not exceed $150,000. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micropurchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. There were 27 vendors exceeding the small purchase threshold during the audit period. Of those, 5 vendors were selected for testing. For all 5 vendors tested, totaling $299,889, the School Corporation did not obtain price or rate quotes. Documentation detailing the history of procurement, which must include the reason for the procurement method used, selection of the vendor, and the basis for the price, was not available for audit. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 24 MICHIGAN CITY AREA SCHOOLS SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 2 CFR 200.318 states in part: "(a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. . . . (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. . . ." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases — (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, procurement procedures for goods and services were not adhered to for vendors that fell within the small purchase threshold. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 25 MICHIGAN CITY AREA SCHOOLS SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure there are adequate and appropriate procurement procedures for goods and services. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
2023-004 - Procurement, Suspension & Debarment Federal Program Information: ALN - 10.760 - Water and Waste Disposal Systems for Rural Communities Criteria: The following CFR(s) apply to this finding: 2 CFR 200.317-200.326. Condition: During audit procedures, it was identified that the Town did not have a procurement policy in place. Cause: The Town needs to adopt a procurement policy to comply with Uniform Guidance. Effect: Procurements might not conform to applicable Federal laws. Identification of Questioned Costs: None identified. Context: The entire population. Repeat Finding: This is a repeat finding of 2022-004. Recommendation: It is recommended that the Town adopt a procurement policy that follows the Uniform Guidance and that the Town implement internal control processes and procedures to ensure that the adopted policy is followed. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan: Client agrees with finding and a version of their response can be found in the Corrective Action Plan. Please see the Corrective Action Plan issued by the Town of Livermore Falls.
2023-007- Procurement, Suspension & Debarment Federal Program Information: ALN - 66.458 - Clean Water State Revolving Funds Criteria: The following CFR(s) apply to this finding: 2 CFR 200.317 - 200.326. Condition: During audit procedures, it was identified that the Town did not have a procurement policy in place. Cause: The Town needs to adopt a procurement policy to comply with Uniform Guidance. Effect: Procurements might not conform to applicable Federal laws. Identification of Questioned Costs: None identified. Context: The entire population Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding Recommendation: It is recommended that the Town adopt a procurement policy that follows the Uniform Guidance and that the Town implements internal control processes and procedures to ensure that the adopted policy is followed. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan: Client agrees with finding and a version of their response can be found in the Corrective Action Plan. Please see the Corrective Action Plan issued by the Town of Livermore Falls.
2023-007- Procurement, Suspension & Debarment Federal Program Information: ALN - 66.458 - Clean Water State Revolving Funds Criteria: The following CFR(s) apply to this finding: 2 CFR 200.317 - 200.326. Condition: During audit procedures, it was identified that the Town did not have a procurement policy in place. Cause: The Town needs to adopt a procurement policy to comply with Uniform Guidance. Effect: Procurements might not conform to applicable Federal laws. Identification of Questioned Costs: None identified. Context: The entire population Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding Recommendation: It is recommended that the Town adopt a procurement policy that follows the Uniform Guidance and that the Town implements internal control processes and procedures to ensure that the adopted policy is followed. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan: Client agrees with finding and a version of their response can be found in the Corrective Action Plan. Please see the Corrective Action Plan issued by the Town of Livermore Falls.
2023-007- Procurement, Suspension & Debarment Federal Program Information: ALN - 66.458 - Clean Water State Revolving Funds Criteria: The following CFR(s) apply to this finding: 2 CFR 200.317 - 200.326. Condition: During audit procedures, it was identified that the Town did not have a procurement policy in place. Cause: The Town needs to adopt a procurement policy to comply with Uniform Guidance. Effect: Procurements might not conform to applicable Federal laws. Identification of Questioned Costs: None identified. Context: The entire population Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding Recommendation: It is recommended that the Town adopt a procurement policy that follows the Uniform Guidance and that the Town implements internal control processes and procedures to ensure that the adopted policy is followed. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan: Client agrees with finding and a version of their response can be found in the Corrective Action Plan. Please see the Corrective Action Plan issued by the Town of Livermore Falls.
2023-007- Procurement, Suspension & Debarment Federal Program Information: ALN - 66.458 - Clean Water State Revolving Funds Criteria: The following CFR(s) apply to this finding: 2 CFR 200.317 - 200.326. Condition: During audit procedures, it was identified that the Town did not have a procurement policy in place. Cause: The Town needs to adopt a procurement policy to comply with Uniform Guidance. Effect: Procurements might not conform to applicable Federal laws. Identification of Questioned Costs: None identified. Context: The entire population Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding Recommendation: It is recommended that the Town adopt a procurement policy that follows the Uniform Guidance and that the Town implements internal control processes and procedures to ensure that the adopted policy is followed. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan: Client agrees with finding and a version of their response can be found in the Corrective Action Plan. Please see the Corrective Action Plan issued by the Town of Livermore Falls.
Condition: The Organization’s written policies and procedures related to financial management and procurement do not meet the requirements of 2 CFR 200, Subpart D and Subpart E. Criteria: According to 2 CFR Section 200.302.b and 2 CFR Section 200.305 of the Uniform Guidance, the Organization is required to have a written financial management policy. Additionally, according to 2 CFR Section 200.317 – 200.326, the Organization is required to have a written procurement policy. Cause: The Organization was unaware of requirements regarding policies and procedures outlined in the Uniform Guidance. Effect: Written policies necessary for non-Federal entities receiving federal funds were not in place. Repeat Finding: No Questioned Costs: None reported Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization update their written policies and procedures that meet the requirements of the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: We concur with the auditor’s finding and will update the Organization’s written policies and procedures for the Uniform Guidance requirements.
Condition: The Organization’s written policies and procedures related to financial management and procurement do not meet the requirements of 2 CFR 200, Subpart D and Subpart E. Criteria: According to 2 CFR Section 200.302.b and 2 CFR Section 200.305 of the Uniform Guidance, the Organization is required to have a written financial management policy. Additionally, according to 2 CFR Section 200.317 – 200.326, the Organization is required to have a written procurement policy. Cause: The Organization was unaware of requirements regarding policies and procedures outlined in the Uniform Guidance. Effect: Written policies necessary for non-Federal entities receiving federal funds were not in place. Repeat Finding: No Questioned Costs: None reported Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization update their written policies and procedures that meet the requirements of the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: We concur with the auditor’s finding and will update the Organization’s written policies and procedures for the Uniform Guidance requirements.