Finding 2024-006 – F. Equipment and Real Property Management Information on Federal Program(s) – Research and Development Cluster (ALN’s: Various) Criteria or Specific Requirement – Institutions that expend federal funds on equipment are required to conduct a physical inventory of the equipment at least once every 2 years and reconcile results of the count to the appropriate equipment records, as required by 2 CFR section 200.313(d)(2)). 2 CFR sections 200.313(c) and (e) requires that property records be maintained that include a description of the property, a serial number or other identification number, the source of funding for the property (including the Federal award identification number), who holds title, the acquisition date, cost of the property, percentage of Federal participation in the project costs for the Federal award under which the property was acquired, the location, use and condition of the property, and any ultimate disposition data including the date of disposal and sales price of the property (collectively, the “Required Equipment Information”). Additionally, the Uniform Guidance in 2 CFR Section 200.303, Internal Controls, requires that non-Federal entities receiving Federal awards (i.e., auditee management) establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition – Though the University performed a physical inventory in the last 2 years, the University was unable to provide formal and complete documentation that the physical inventory was properly documented and was properly reconciled to the appropriate equipment records. The documentation consisted of physical count workpapers and was not organized or documented in a fashion that appeared to evidence that the count was complete and that the final count was reconciled to the University's equipment records. Additionally, the Required Equipment Information could not be fully provided for 1 equipment purchased with Federal funds during the current year. Cause - Administrative oversight and insufficient internal controls. Effect or Potential Effect – The University was not in compliance with equipment management requirements. Questioned Costs – None. Context – Although the University completed a physical inventory, formal documentation to support that a complete physical count was reconciled to the appropriate equipment records in the past 2 years could not be provided. As a result, we were unable to verify whether all differences between the physical inventory and equipment records were resolved. For 1 of 3 equipment purchased during the current year that was selected for testing, the Required Equipment Information could not be provided. Indication of Repeat Finding - No similar finding noted in the prior year. Recommendation – We recommend that the University enhance its procedures and internal controls over the physical inventory count of equipment purchased with Federal funds as well as the recordkeeping and retention of the Required Equipment Information, to ensure that supporting documentation for property records, as well as the physical inventory and required reconciliation of the count to records is maintained as required by the sections of 2 CFR 200.313 noted above. Views of Responsible Officials – The University acknowledges the findings of the audit report and is committed to immediate corrective measures to enhance compliance and assurance. To address these issues, the University will: 1. Establish an Internal Audit Function: Request a position number from the State of South Carolina Human Resources Office to create an internal auditing role and develop a dedicated budget line item to support this function. 2. Realign the Physical Inventory Team: Reorganize the physical inventory team to strengthen procedures and improve the documentation process, ensuring adherence to federal requirements. 3. Implement Advanced Inventory Management Software: Adopt a technology-based platform to enhance the efficiency and accuracy of equipment and real property management systems. The newly established internal audit team will oversee and manage the corrective action plans until full compliance is achieved. The University is dedicated to enhancing its procedures and internal controls to meet federal equipment and real property management standards. By implementing these measures, the University aims to rectify the identified deficiencies and ensure ongoing compliance with federal regulations.
Finding 2024-006 – F. Equipment and Real Property Management Information on Federal Program(s) – Research and Development Cluster (ALN’s: Various) Criteria or Specific Requirement – Institutions that expend federal funds on equipment are required to conduct a physical inventory of the equipment at least once every 2 years and reconcile results of the count to the appropriate equipment records, as required by 2 CFR section 200.313(d)(2)). 2 CFR sections 200.313(c) and (e) requires that property records be maintained that include a description of the property, a serial number or other identification number, the source of funding for the property (including the Federal award identification number), who holds title, the acquisition date, cost of the property, percentage of Federal participation in the project costs for the Federal award under which the property was acquired, the location, use and condition of the property, and any ultimate disposition data including the date of disposal and sales price of the property (collectively, the “Required Equipment Information”). Additionally, the Uniform Guidance in 2 CFR Section 200.303, Internal Controls, requires that non-Federal entities receiving Federal awards (i.e., auditee management) establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition – Though the University performed a physical inventory in the last 2 years, the University was unable to provide formal and complete documentation that the physical inventory was properly documented and was properly reconciled to the appropriate equipment records. The documentation consisted of physical count workpapers and was not organized or documented in a fashion that appeared to evidence that the count was complete and that the final count was reconciled to the University's equipment records. Additionally, the Required Equipment Information could not be fully provided for 1 equipment purchased with Federal funds during the current year. Cause - Administrative oversight and insufficient internal controls. Effect or Potential Effect – The University was not in compliance with equipment management requirements. Questioned Costs – None. Context – Although the University completed a physical inventory, formal documentation to support that a complete physical count was reconciled to the appropriate equipment records in the past 2 years could not be provided. As a result, we were unable to verify whether all differences between the physical inventory and equipment records were resolved. For 1 of 3 equipment purchased during the current year that was selected for testing, the Required Equipment Information could not be provided. Indication of Repeat Finding - No similar finding noted in the prior year. Recommendation – We recommend that the University enhance its procedures and internal controls over the physical inventory count of equipment purchased with Federal funds as well as the recordkeeping and retention of the Required Equipment Information, to ensure that supporting documentation for property records, as well as the physical inventory and required reconciliation of the count to records is maintained as required by the sections of 2 CFR 200.313 noted above. Views of Responsible Officials – The University acknowledges the findings of the audit report and is committed to immediate corrective measures to enhance compliance and assurance. To address these issues, the University will: 1. Establish an Internal Audit Function: Request a position number from the State of South Carolina Human Resources Office to create an internal auditing role and develop a dedicated budget line item to support this function. 2. Realign the Physical Inventory Team: Reorganize the physical inventory team to strengthen procedures and improve the documentation process, ensuring adherence to federal requirements. 3. Implement Advanced Inventory Management Software: Adopt a technology-based platform to enhance the efficiency and accuracy of equipment and real property management systems. The newly established internal audit team will oversee and manage the corrective action plans until full compliance is achieved. The University is dedicated to enhancing its procedures and internal controls to meet federal equipment and real property management standards. By implementing these measures, the University aims to rectify the identified deficiencies and ensure ongoing compliance with federal regulations.
2024-007: U.S. Department of Homeland Security Pass-through North Lake Tahoe Fire Protection District Assistance to Firefighters Grant, 97.044 Equipment and Real Property Management Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Grant Award Number: Affects all grant awards under assistance listing 97.044 on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Criteria: Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) section 200.313 requires that property records be maintained that include a description of the property, a serial number or other identification number, the source of funding for the property (including federal award identification number), who holds title, acquisition date, cost of the property, percentage of federal participation in the project costs for the federal award under which the property was acquired, the location, use and condition of the property, and any ultimate disposition data including the date of disposal and sales price of the property. Condition: Property records did not originally include the title, acquisition date, percentage of federal participation, and condition of the equipment. Cause: Tahoe Douglas Fire Protection District (the District) did not have adequate internal controls to ensure property records track all applicable information on equipment purchased with federal funds. Effect: Incomplete information was maintained for federal equipment. Questioned Costs: None Context/Sampling: A nonstatistical sample of 9 out of 57 equipment was selected for testing. None of the equipment tested included all required information. Repeat Finding from Prior Year: No Recommendation: We recommend the District enhance internal controls to ensure property records are appropriately maintained. Views of Responsible Officials: Tahoe Douglas Fire Protection District agrees with this finding.
2024-001. Equipment and Real Property Management United States of Department of Education, Passed Through New York State, Department of Education: Education Stabilization Fund COVID-19: Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund ALN: 84.425D COVID-19: American Rescue Plan - Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief ALN: 84.425U Criteria: Education Stabilization Fund (ESF) grant awards authorized under the federal Coronavirus Response and Relief Supplemental Appropriations (CRRSA) Act and American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 (ARP) may be used for equipment purchases and capital expenditures, consistent with federal regulations 2 CFR §200.313 and 2 CFR §200.439. In accordance with 2 CFR §200.313, non-federal entities receiving federal awards are required to have procedures for managing equipment (including replacement equipment), whether acquired in whole or in part under a federal award, until disposition takes place. This includes maintaining property records that include a description of the property, a serial number or other identification number, the source of funding for the property, including the Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN), and who holds title. In addition, it requires non-federal entities to track the acquisition date and cost of the property, percentage of federal participation in the project costs for the federal award under which the property was acquired, the location, use and condition of the property, and any ultimate disposition data including the date of disposal and sale price of the property. A physical inventory of the property acquired with federal awards must also be taken and the results reconciled with the property inventory records at least once every two years. Condition: The District did not include COVID grants-funded capital improvements in its capital assets inventory records. Cause: Insufficient internal controls over the tracking and reporting of federally-funded capital improvements. The District recorded expenditures for CRRSA and ARP grants-funded capital improvements and upgrades to its facilities and ventilation systems as contractual/purchased services in the special aid fund based on instructions from the pass-through entity instead of in the capital projects fund. As a result, District personnel compiling annual capital additions information did not identify the COVID grants-funded capital improvements as capital assets that should be added to the capital assets inventory listing. Effect: Failure to include capital improvements acquired with Federal awards in the District’s capital assets inventory records affects its financial reporting in conformity with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) and could lead to improper or non-compliant procedures for assets inventory management, and the subsequent disposal of those capital assets. Questioned Costs: None reported. Context: The District uses specific expenditure codes in its special aid fund to identify and track various categories of expenditures incurred that are reimbursable under various Federal awards, including the ESSER grant awards under the CRRSA Act and ARP. Based on instructions from the pass-through entity, the New York State Education Department (NYSED), the District included eligible capital improvement costs in its CRRSA ESSER 2 and ARP ESSER 3 budget applications as purchased services, which were approved by the NYSED, and recorded the expenditures in its special aid fund’s contractual expenditures object code (.400 code). When District personnel compiled the listing of capital improvements additions for the fiscal year to perform the annual update of the capital assets inventory record, they reviewed and included capital costs from the District’s capital projects fund, but did not review or identify the costs of the various capital improvements that were recorded in the special aid fund’s .400 contractual expenditures code. Identification of a Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit. Recommendation: The District should review and revise its existing procedures for compiling annual capital assets additions information to ensure capital expenditures purchased with Federal awards that meet the District’s capitalization threshold are considered and evaluated for inclusion in the District’s annual capital assets inventory records as appropriate. Views of Responsible Officials of Auditee: The District acknowledges but does not fully agree with this finding. federally-funded expenditures were recorded in the Special Aid Fund as purchased services, both on the FS-10 budgets and the purchase orders for portion of the capital improvement projects the PO’s were issued against. These payments are partially payments to contractors for wages, labor, materials, and other items, not necessarily equipment. The methods of financing for all these costs are reported on the State SA-139 Building Project Data Forms as partially funded by grants from ARPA & ESSER and annual district appropriation budget; hence, in the District’s annual capital asset inventory report, they will eventually be reconciled with the final building project cost report and will be added and tracked as part of the whole capital improvement projects.
2024-001. Equipment and Real Property Management United States of Department of Education, Passed Through New York State, Department of Education: Education Stabilization Fund COVID-19: Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund ALN: 84.425D COVID-19: American Rescue Plan - Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief ALN: 84.425U Criteria: Education Stabilization Fund (ESF) grant awards authorized under the federal Coronavirus Response and Relief Supplemental Appropriations (CRRSA) Act and American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 (ARP) may be used for equipment purchases and capital expenditures, consistent with federal regulations 2 CFR §200.313 and 2 CFR §200.439. In accordance with 2 CFR §200.313, non-federal entities receiving federal awards are required to have procedures for managing equipment (including replacement equipment), whether acquired in whole or in part under a federal award, until disposition takes place. This includes maintaining property records that include a description of the property, a serial number or other identification number, the source of funding for the property, including the Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN), and who holds title. In addition, it requires non-federal entities to track the acquisition date and cost of the property, percentage of federal participation in the project costs for the federal award under which the property was acquired, the location, use and condition of the property, and any ultimate disposition data including the date of disposal and sale price of the property. A physical inventory of the property acquired with federal awards must also be taken and the results reconciled with the property inventory records at least once every two years. Condition: The District did not include COVID grants-funded capital improvements in its capital assets inventory records. Cause: Insufficient internal controls over the tracking and reporting of federally-funded capital improvements. The District recorded expenditures for CRRSA and ARP grants-funded capital improvements and upgrades to its facilities and ventilation systems as contractual/purchased services in the special aid fund based on instructions from the pass-through entity instead of in the capital projects fund. As a result, District personnel compiling annual capital additions information did not identify the COVID grants-funded capital improvements as capital assets that should be added to the capital assets inventory listing. Effect: Failure to include capital improvements acquired with Federal awards in the District’s capital assets inventory records affects its financial reporting in conformity with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) and could lead to improper or non-compliant procedures for assets inventory management, and the subsequent disposal of those capital assets. Questioned Costs: None reported. Context: The District uses specific expenditure codes in its special aid fund to identify and track various categories of expenditures incurred that are reimbursable under various Federal awards, including the ESSER grant awards under the CRRSA Act and ARP. Based on instructions from the pass-through entity, the New York State Education Department (NYSED), the District included eligible capital improvement costs in its CRRSA ESSER 2 and ARP ESSER 3 budget applications as purchased services, which were approved by the NYSED, and recorded the expenditures in its special aid fund’s contractual expenditures object code (.400 code). When District personnel compiled the listing of capital improvements additions for the fiscal year to perform the annual update of the capital assets inventory record, they reviewed and included capital costs from the District’s capital projects fund, but did not review or identify the costs of the various capital improvements that were recorded in the special aid fund’s .400 contractual expenditures code. Identification of a Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit. Recommendation: The District should review and revise its existing procedures for compiling annual capital assets additions information to ensure capital expenditures purchased with Federal awards that meet the District’s capitalization threshold are considered and evaluated for inclusion in the District’s annual capital assets inventory records as appropriate. Views of Responsible Officials of Auditee: The District acknowledges but does not fully agree with this finding. federally-funded expenditures were recorded in the Special Aid Fund as purchased services, both on the FS-10 budgets and the purchase orders for portion of the capital improvement projects the PO’s were issued against. These payments are partially payments to contractors for wages, labor, materials, and other items, not necessarily equipment. The methods of financing for all these costs are reported on the State SA-139 Building Project Data Forms as partially funded by grants from ARPA & ESSER and annual district appropriation budget; hence, in the District’s annual capital asset inventory report, they will eventually be reconciled with the final building project cost report and will be added and tracked as part of the whole capital improvement projects.
2024-001 U.S. Department of Education, Charter Schools (CSP) Assistance Listing Number 84.282 Equipment Management Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria: Non-federal entities other than states must follow 2 CFR sections 200.313(c) through (e) which require that: Property records must be maintained that include a description of the property, a serial number or other identification number, the source of funding for the property (including the federal award identification number), who holds title, the acquisition date, cost of the property, percentage of federal participation in the project costs for the federal award under which the property was acquired, the location, use and condition of the property, and any ultimate disposition data including the date of disposal and sales price of the property (2 CFR section 200.313(d)(1)). Condition: The School does not appear to be tracking all of the elements required by the federal government when purchasing equipment with federal funds. Cause: While the School does track the property purchased with federal funds, they do not appear have formal policies in place for ensuring the completeness of property records. Effect: The School does not comply with requirements to maintain certain elements as required by the federal government when purchasing equipment with federal funds. Questioned costs: None reported. Context: Out of our sample of 3 equipment purchases, we noted that the School records did not contain all of the elements required by the Federal government. Nonstatistical sampling was used. Repeat Finding From Prior Year: No Recommendation: We recommend that management design procedures to ensure that all of the required elements are maintained in the property records for any equipment purchased with federal funds. Views of Responsible Officials: We agree with the finding.
FINDING 2024-002 – EQUIPMENT AND REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT Significant Deficiency Federal Programs: Education Stabilization Fund – Assistance Listing Number 84.425 Repeat Finding: This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2023-002. Criteria 2 CFR 200.313(d) contains equipment management requirements which dictate property records entities must maintain and the need for procedures to adequately safeguard and maintain assets acquired with federal funding. Condition The Organization did not retain in their accounting records all the required information. Specifically, the federal award identification number, holder of the title, use, and condition were not listed. The federal participation was assumed based on allocations between fund codes in the general ledger. Additionally, sufficient and appropriate documentation did not exist to support a physical inventory had been completed for all assets once in the last two years. Cause and Effect As described in 2024-001, the Organization has not established a formal process related to federal awards to identify all key compliance requirements and changes in compliance requirements, evaluate risks of noncompliance with these requirements, and respond to such risks of noncompliance through establishing or changing processes and internal controls. Additionally, certain individuals, within a department, responsible for the use of federal funds or maintenance and safeguard of assets acquired with federal funds lacked knowledge of the compliance requirements pertaining to the use of the funds or the maintenance and safeguard of the acquired assets. As a result, adequate documentation was not maintained for equipment acquired with federal funds or to support the performance of a physical inventory occurring within the required time period. Recommendation We recommend the Organization develop a system of internal controls aligned with the applicable compliance requirements to properly track equipment acquisitions in the accounting records and to ensure a physical inventory is appropriately documented when completed. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions The Organization’s Corrective Action Plan is included on pages 42 through 44.
2024-007 (2023-012) – EQUIPMENT AND REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT Type of Finding: (E) Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance of Federal Awards and (G) Instance of Non-compliance related to Federal Awards Funding Agency: U.S. Department of Transportation Title: Airport Improvement Program AL #: 20.106 Award #: 3-35-0039-031-2024, 3-35-0039-027-2022, 3-35-0039-028-2022, 3-35-0039-029-2023 Award Period: May 1, 2024 – January 1, 2025, December 13, 2021 – December 13, 2025, June 24, 2022 – June 24, 2026, July 3, 2023 – July 7, 2027 Questioned Costs: None Statement of Condition The County was not able to provide a complete and accurate equipment listing tracking items purchased with federal funding nor did the County conduct a physical inventory identifying federal assets. Management’s Progress Toward Prior Year Corrective Action Plan: There was no progress made in the year ended June 30, 2024. Criteria Per 2 CFR 200.303(a), the non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework,” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Per 2 CFR 200.313(d)(1) Property records must be maintained that include a description of the property, a serial number or other identification number, the source of funding for the property (including the FAIN), who holds title, the acquisition date, and cost of the property, percentage of Federal participation in the project costs for the Federal award under which the property was acquired, the location, use and condition of the property, and any ultimate disposition data including the date of disposal and sale price of the property. Per 2 CFR 200.313(d)(2), a physical inventory of program property must be taken and the results reconciled with the property records at least once every 2 years. Cause The County is not following policy and procedures to ensure that equipment purchased with federal funds is maintained and tracked and the County performing a physical inventory at a minimum of every two years. Effect The County could dispose of or lose federally funded equipment without following federal guidelines. Recommendation The auditor recommends the County enhance the design of its control activities and policies and procedures should be developed to ensure physical inventories are taken at least once every two years and that the County creates a tool to assist in tracking and maintaining equipment purchased with federal funds.
2024-007 (2023-012) – EQUIPMENT AND REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT Type of Finding: (E) Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance of Federal Awards and (G) Instance of Non-compliance related to Federal Awards Funding Agency: U.S. Department of Transportation Title: Airport Improvement Program AL #: 20.106 Award #: 3-35-0039-031-2024, 3-35-0039-027-2022, 3-35-0039-028-2022, 3-35-0039-029-2023 Award Period: May 1, 2024 – January 1, 2025, December 13, 2021 – December 13, 2025, June 24, 2022 – June 24, 2026, July 3, 2023 – July 7, 2027 Questioned Costs: None Statement of Condition The County was not able to provide a complete and accurate equipment listing tracking items purchased with federal funding nor did the County conduct a physical inventory identifying federal assets. Management’s Progress Toward Prior Year Corrective Action Plan: There was no progress made in the year ended June 30, 2024. Criteria Per 2 CFR 200.303(a), the non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework,” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Per 2 CFR 200.313(d)(1) Property records must be maintained that include a description of the property, a serial number or other identification number, the source of funding for the property (including the FAIN), who holds title, the acquisition date, and cost of the property, percentage of Federal participation in the project costs for the Federal award under which the property was acquired, the location, use and condition of the property, and any ultimate disposition data including the date of disposal and sale price of the property. Per 2 CFR 200.313(d)(2), a physical inventory of program property must be taken and the results reconciled with the property records at least once every 2 years. Cause The County is not following policy and procedures to ensure that equipment purchased with federal funds is maintained and tracked and the County performing a physical inventory at a minimum of every two years. Effect The County could dispose of or lose federally funded equipment without following federal guidelines. Recommendation The auditor recommends the County enhance the design of its control activities and policies and procedures should be developed to ensure physical inventories are taken at least once every two years and that the County creates a tool to assist in tracking and maintaining equipment purchased with federal funds.
2024-007 (2023-012) – EQUIPMENT AND REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT Type of Finding: (E) Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance of Federal Awards and (G) Instance of Non-compliance related to Federal Awards Funding Agency: U.S. Department of Transportation Title: Airport Improvement Program AL #: 20.106 Award #: 3-35-0039-031-2024, 3-35-0039-027-2022, 3-35-0039-028-2022, 3-35-0039-029-2023 Award Period: May 1, 2024 – January 1, 2025, December 13, 2021 – December 13, 2025, June 24, 2022 – June 24, 2026, July 3, 2023 – July 7, 2027 Questioned Costs: None Statement of Condition The County was not able to provide a complete and accurate equipment listing tracking items purchased with federal funding nor did the County conduct a physical inventory identifying federal assets. Management’s Progress Toward Prior Year Corrective Action Plan: There was no progress made in the year ended June 30, 2024. Criteria Per 2 CFR 200.303(a), the non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework,” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Per 2 CFR 200.313(d)(1) Property records must be maintained that include a description of the property, a serial number or other identification number, the source of funding for the property (including the FAIN), who holds title, the acquisition date, and cost of the property, percentage of Federal participation in the project costs for the Federal award under which the property was acquired, the location, use and condition of the property, and any ultimate disposition data including the date of disposal and sale price of the property. Per 2 CFR 200.313(d)(2), a physical inventory of program property must be taken and the results reconciled with the property records at least once every 2 years. Cause The County is not following policy and procedures to ensure that equipment purchased with federal funds is maintained and tracked and the County performing a physical inventory at a minimum of every two years. Effect The County could dispose of or lose federally funded equipment without following federal guidelines. Recommendation The auditor recommends the County enhance the design of its control activities and policies and procedures should be developed to ensure physical inventories are taken at least once every two years and that the County creates a tool to assist in tracking and maintaining equipment purchased with federal funds.
2024-007 (2023-012) – EQUIPMENT AND REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT Type of Finding: (E) Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance of Federal Awards and (G) Instance of Non-compliance related to Federal Awards Funding Agency: U.S. Department of Transportation Title: Airport Improvement Program AL #: 20.106 Award #: 3-35-0039-031-2024, 3-35-0039-027-2022, 3-35-0039-028-2022, 3-35-0039-029-2023 Award Period: May 1, 2024 – January 1, 2025, December 13, 2021 – December 13, 2025, June 24, 2022 – June 24, 2026, July 3, 2023 – July 7, 2027 Questioned Costs: None Statement of Condition The County was not able to provide a complete and accurate equipment listing tracking items purchased with federal funding nor did the County conduct a physical inventory identifying federal assets. Management’s Progress Toward Prior Year Corrective Action Plan: There was no progress made in the year ended June 30, 2024. Criteria Per 2 CFR 200.303(a), the non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework,” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Per 2 CFR 200.313(d)(1) Property records must be maintained that include a description of the property, a serial number or other identification number, the source of funding for the property (including the FAIN), who holds title, the acquisition date, and cost of the property, percentage of Federal participation in the project costs for the Federal award under which the property was acquired, the location, use and condition of the property, and any ultimate disposition data including the date of disposal and sale price of the property. Per 2 CFR 200.313(d)(2), a physical inventory of program property must be taken and the results reconciled with the property records at least once every 2 years. Cause The County is not following policy and procedures to ensure that equipment purchased with federal funds is maintained and tracked and the County performing a physical inventory at a minimum of every two years. Effect The County could dispose of or lose federally funded equipment without following federal guidelines. Recommendation The auditor recommends the County enhance the design of its control activities and policies and procedures should be developed to ensure physical inventories are taken at least once every two years and that the County creates a tool to assist in tracking and maintaining equipment purchased with federal funds.
Criteria 2 CFR 200.313, Equipment , requires the following with respect to equipment purchased with Federal Funds: (1) Property records must be maintained that include a description of the property, a serial number or other identification number, the source of funding for the property (including the FAIN), who holds title, the acquisition date, and cost of the property, percentage of Federal participation in the project costs for the Federal award under which the property was acquired, the location, use and condition of the property, and any ultimate disposition data including the date of disposal and sale price of the property. (2) A physical inventory of the property must be taken and the results reconciled with the property records at least once every two years. (3) A control system must be developed to ensure adequate safeguards to prevent loss, damage, or theft of the property. Any loss, damage, or theft must be investigated. Condition: The District does not currently maintain a detailed accounting/list of its capital assets, including Federal assets. The District does not have a recent replacement cost valuation for insurance purposes. We consider this finding to be a material weakness in internal control over major programs. Questioned Costs: N/A Context: The District has not updated or prepared a detailed listing of capital assets in recent years, but rather has relied upon the auditor to provided non-auditing services in this area. The District has not obtained an insurance valuation of its property in recent years. Effect: The District is out of compliance with Federal property regulations as a result of this condition. Cause: The cause of the condition is because the District has not contracted with any third parties to accomplish the task, nor has it allocated internal resources to the condition. Recommendation: We recommend that the District contract with a third party asset vendor or allocate internal business office resources to performing a detailed inventory and accounting of capital assets. We also recommend the District obtain an appraisal for insurance purposes to ensure that the District's property is appropriately insured in the event of loss. Management Response: Management agrees with this finding. Management is in the process of determining the most efficient way to handle this process and is evaluating the cost-benefit of implementing various processes and procedures.
Criteria 2 CFR 200.313, Equipment , requires the following with respect to equipment purchased with Federal Funds: (1) Property records must be maintained that include a description of the property, a serial number or other identification number, the source of funding for the property (including the FAIN), who holds title, the acquisition date, and cost of the property, percentage of Federal participation in the project costs for the Federal award under which the property was acquired, the location, use and condition of the property, and any ultimate disposition data including the date of disposal and sale price of the property. (2) A physical inventory of the property must be taken and the results reconciled with the property records at least once every two years. (3) A control system must be developed to ensure adequate safeguards to prevent loss, damage, or theft of the property. Any loss, damage, or theft must be investigated. Condition: The District does not currently maintain a detailed accounting/list of its capital assets, including Federal assets. The District does not have a recent replacement cost valuation for insurance purposes. We consider this finding to be a material weakness in internal control over major programs. Questioned Costs: N/A Context: The District has not updated or prepared a detailed listing of capital assets in recent years, but rather has relied upon the auditor to provided non-auditing services in this area. The District has not obtained an insurance valuation of its property in recent years. Effect: The District is out of compliance with Federal property regulations as a result of this condition. Cause: The cause of the condition is because the District has not contracted with any third parties to accomplish the task, nor has it allocated internal resources to the condition. Recommendation: We recommend that the District contract with a third party asset vendor or allocate internal business office resources to performing a detailed inventory and accounting of capital assets. We also recommend the District obtain an appraisal for insurance purposes to ensure that the District's property is appropriately insured in the event of loss. Management Response: Management agrees with this finding. Management is in the process of determining the most efficient way to handle this process and is evaluating the cost-benefit of implementing various processes and procedures.
Criteria 2 CFR 200.313, Equipment , requires the following with respect to equipment purchased with Federal Funds: (1) Property records must be maintained that include a description of the property, a serial number or other identification number, the source of funding for the property (including the FAIN), who holds title, the acquisition date, and cost of the property, percentage of Federal participation in the project costs for the Federal award under which the property was acquired, the location, use and condition of the property, and any ultimate disposition data including the date of disposal and sale price of the property. (2) A physical inventory of the property must be taken and the results reconciled with the property records at least once every two years. (3) A control system must be developed to ensure adequate safeguards to prevent loss, damage, or theft of the property. Any loss, damage, or theft must be investigated. Condition: The District does not currently maintain a detailed accounting/list of its capital assets, including Federal assets. The District does not have a recent replacement cost valuation for insurance purposes. We consider this finding to be a material weakness in internal control over major programs. Questioned Costs: N/A Context: The District has not updated or prepared a detailed listing of capital assets in recent years, but rather has relied upon the auditor to provided non-auditing services in this area. The District has not obtained an insurance valuation of its property in recent years. Effect: The District is out of compliance with Federal property regulations as a result of this condition. Cause: The cause of the condition is because the District has not contracted with any third parties to accomplish the task, nor has it allocated internal resources to the condition. Recommendation: We recommend that the District contract with a third party asset vendor or allocate internal business office resources to performing a detailed inventory and accounting of capital assets. We also recommend the District obtain an appraisal for insurance purposes to ensure that the District's property is appropriately insured in the event of loss. Management Response: Management agrees with this finding. Management is in the process of determining the most efficient way to handle this process and is evaluating the cost-benefit of implementing various processes and procedures.
Criteria 2 CFR 200.313, Equipment , requires the following with respect to equipment purchased with Federal Funds: (1) Property records must be maintained that include a description of the property, a serial number or other identification number, the source of funding for the property (including the FAIN), who holds title, the acquisition date, and cost of the property, percentage of Federal participation in the project costs for the Federal award under which the property was acquired, the location, use and condition of the property, and any ultimate disposition data including the date of disposal and sale price of the property. (2) A physical inventory of the property must be taken and the results reconciled with the property records at least once every two years. (3) A control system must be developed to ensure adequate safeguards to prevent loss, damage, or theft of the property. Any loss, damage, or theft must be investigated. Condition: The District does not currently maintain a detailed accounting/list of its capital assets, including Federal assets. The District does not have a recent replacement cost valuation for insurance purposes. We consider this finding to be a material weakness in internal control over major programs. Questioned Costs: N/A Context: The District has not updated or prepared a detailed listing of capital assets in recent years, but rather has relied upon the auditor to provided non-auditing services in this area. The District has not obtained an insurance valuation of its property in recent years. Effect: The District is out of compliance with Federal property regulations as a result of this condition. Cause: The cause of the condition is because the District has not contracted with any third parties to accomplish the task, nor has it allocated internal resources to the condition. Recommendation: We recommend that the District contract with a third party asset vendor or allocate internal business office resources to performing a detailed inventory and accounting of capital assets. We also recommend the District obtain an appraisal for insurance purposes to ensure that the District's property is appropriately insured in the event of loss. Management Response: Management agrees with this finding. Management is in the process of determining the most efficient way to handle this process and is evaluating the cost-benefit of implementing various processes and procedures.
SECTION III - FEDERAL AWARDS FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS 2024-005 EQUIPMENT/REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT Program: Education Stabilization Fund CFDA Number: 84.425D, 84.425U Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-Through Agency: Arizona Department of Education Grantor Number: 21FESSII-111389-01A, 21FESIII-111389-01A Questioned Costs: $-0- Type of Finding: Noncompliance, significant deficiency Compliance Requirement: F. Equipment/Real Property Management Condition/Context: The District did not properly update its capital assets listing to include equipment purchased using Education Stabilization Fund monies. Additionally, the District has not performed a full physical inventory of its assets purchased using federal monies in the two year period ended June 30, 2024. Criteria: The District must follow 2 CFR sections 200.313 which requires that: Property records must be maintained that include a description of the property, a serial number or other identification number, the source of funding for the property (including the federal award identification number), who holds title, the acquisition date, cost of the property, percentage of federal participation in the project costs for the federal award under which the property was acquired, the location, use and condition of the property, and any ultimate disposition data including the date of disposal and sales price of the property. Cause: The District did not have proper internal controls over property and equipment to ensure the capital assets listing was properly updated. Effect: Noncompliance and internal control weakness. The District could inadvertently use an asset outside of its intended purpose and assets could go missing. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend that the District establish proper internal controls over property and equipment to ensure all assets are properly recorded on the District’s capital assets listing and those federal equipment and vehicle are properly tracked and maintained. The District should also complete a full physical inventory and reconcile the results against the asset listings. Views of Responsible Officials: There was no disagreement with the finding. Contact Person: Judy James, Business Manager
1. Noncompliance/Material Weakness - Inventory Finding Number: 2024-001 Assistance Listing Number and Title: AL #84.425 – COVID 19 Education Stabilization Fund Federal Award Identification Number / Year: S425D210035 / 2024 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Equipment and Real Property Management Pass-Through Entity: N/A Repeat Finding from Prior Audit? No 2 CFR § 3474.1 gives regulatory effect to the Department of Education for 2 CFR § 200.313 (d)(1) and (2), which indicates property records must be maintained that include a description of the property, a serial number or other identification number, the source of funding for the property (including the FAIN), who holds title, the acquisition date, and cost of the property, percentage of Federal participation in the project costs for the Federal award under which the property was acquired, the location, use and condition of the property, and any ultimate disposition data including the date of disposal and sale price of the property. A physical inventory of the property purchased with Federal funds must be taken and the results reconciled with the property records at least once every two years. The District purchased and installed new HVAC units during fiscal year 2024. $566,723 of the total $914,441 used for the purchase involved COVID-19 American Rescue Plan- Elementary & Secondary Emergency Relief funds. Due to deficiencies in inventory controls, these assets were not added to the District's inventory system as of June 30, 2024. Failing to record equipment purchased with Federal funds does not allow for proper asset tracking, as required. The understatement of $914,441 to Capital Assets, was not material to the financial statements. Also, there was no indication that a physical inventory of the property acquired under the Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER II, AL number 84.425D) and American Rescue Plan Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ARP ESSER), AL number 84.425U) had been performed within the preceding two years. Noncompliance with the requirements of Federal grants may result in the loss of current or future federal funding and possible questioned costs in future audits. The District should ensure all equipment purchased with Federal funds are recorded on the capital asset listing and denote the asset was purchased with Federal Funds. Physical inventories should be performed, at a minimum, once every two years to ensure compliance with Federal requirements and verify that assets held per the capital asset listing actually exist. This will help detect errors, fraud, theft, or omissions.
Finding No. 2024-005 Significant Deficiency: Equipment and Real Property Management – Compliance and Control Finding ALN 84.425 – COVID-19: Education Stabilization Fund Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-Through Entity: Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Criteria Or Specific Requirement: According to Uniform Guidance, 2 CFR Section 200.313 (d)(2), a physical inventory of the property must be taken and the results reconciled with the property records at least once every two years. Condition: The District did not perform a physical inventory over a two-year period. The District does not have controls in place to ensure bi-annual inventories will be performed to capture equipment purchase with federal funds. Cause: The District did maintain a property and equipment listing for federally funded purchases, however, there was no supporting documentation to demonstrate that a bi-annual inventory was performed. The District has two inventory technicians and equipment is maintained at over sixty locations. The staffing was not sufficient to ensure bi-annual could be completed within the proper timeframe. Effect Or Potential Effect: The District is not in compliance with the Uniform Guidance compliance requirements regarding equipment management. Questioned Costs: Not applicable. Context: No evidence could be obtained to verify a bi-annual inventory was performed. Identification As A Repeat Finding: 2023-004 Recommendation: We recommend that the District implement procedures and controls to ensure bi-annual inventories are performed in accordance with the Uniform Guidance. Views Of Responsible Officials: The District capitalization policy requires a periodic inventory of all capital assets. Inadequate staffing prevented the physical inventory for the fiscal year, but the district will seek assistance of an asset services firm for the next fiscal year and thereafter as needed.
Finding No. 2024-005 Significant Deficiency: Equipment and Real Property Management – Compliance and Control Finding ALN 84.425 – COVID-19: Education Stabilization Fund Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-Through Entity: Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Criteria Or Specific Requirement: According to Uniform Guidance, 2 CFR Section 200.313 (d)(2), a physical inventory of the property must be taken and the results reconciled with the property records at least once every two years. Condition: The District did not perform a physical inventory over a two-year period. The District does not have controls in place to ensure bi-annual inventories will be performed to capture equipment purchase with federal funds. Cause: The District did maintain a property and equipment listing for federally funded purchases, however, there was no supporting documentation to demonstrate that a bi-annual inventory was performed. The District has two inventory technicians and equipment is maintained at over sixty locations. The staffing was not sufficient to ensure bi-annual could be completed within the proper timeframe. Effect Or Potential Effect: The District is not in compliance with the Uniform Guidance compliance requirements regarding equipment management. Questioned Costs: Not applicable. Context: No evidence could be obtained to verify a bi-annual inventory was performed. Identification As A Repeat Finding: 2023-004 Recommendation: We recommend that the District implement procedures and controls to ensure bi-annual inventories are performed in accordance with the Uniform Guidance. Views Of Responsible Officials: The District capitalization policy requires a periodic inventory of all capital assets. Inadequate staffing prevented the physical inventory for the fiscal year, but the district will seek assistance of an asset services firm for the next fiscal year and thereafter as needed.
Finding No. 2024-005 Significant Deficiency: Equipment and Real Property Management – Compliance and Control Finding ALN 84.425 – COVID-19: Education Stabilization Fund Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-Through Entity: Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Criteria Or Specific Requirement: According to Uniform Guidance, 2 CFR Section 200.313 (d)(2), a physical inventory of the property must be taken and the results reconciled with the property records at least once every two years. Condition: The District did not perform a physical inventory over a two-year period. The District does not have controls in place to ensure bi-annual inventories will be performed to capture equipment purchase with federal funds. Cause: The District did maintain a property and equipment listing for federally funded purchases, however, there was no supporting documentation to demonstrate that a bi-annual inventory was performed. The District has two inventory technicians and equipment is maintained at over sixty locations. The staffing was not sufficient to ensure bi-annual could be completed within the proper timeframe. Effect Or Potential Effect: The District is not in compliance with the Uniform Guidance compliance requirements regarding equipment management. Questioned Costs: Not applicable. Context: No evidence could be obtained to verify a bi-annual inventory was performed. Identification As A Repeat Finding: 2023-004 Recommendation: We recommend that the District implement procedures and controls to ensure bi-annual inventories are performed in accordance with the Uniform Guidance. Views Of Responsible Officials: The District capitalization policy requires a periodic inventory of all capital assets. Inadequate staffing prevented the physical inventory for the fiscal year, but the district will seek assistance of an asset services firm for the next fiscal year and thereafter as needed.
Finding Number: 2024‐002 Repeat Finding: No Program Name/Assistance Listing Title: Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listing Number: 84.425 Federal Agency: U.S Department of Education Federal Award Numbers: S425D210038, S425U210038 Pass‐Through Agency: Arizona Department of Education Questioned Costs: N/A Type of Finding: Noncompliance, Significant Deficiency Compliance Requirement: Equipment and Real Property Management Criteria District management is responsible for establishing and maintaining internal control over the District’s accounting records and financial reporting in order to meet financial reporting objectives of the District. CFR 200.313 requires a physical inventory, of property purchased with federal funds, must be completed and reconciled with the property records every two years. The Uniform System of Financial Records (USFR) prescribes required procedures in the areas of capital assets including an inventory at least every three years. Condition The District lacked adequate financial controls over capital assets. Cause District and Federal policies and internal controls in place were not always operating effectively or were not always followed. Effect The District was not in compliance with CFR 200.313. Context During our review of the District’s capital assets, we noted that the District has not performed a physical inventory and reconciliation over stewardship and capital assets since fiscal year 2016‐17. The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendation The District should appoint an individual to ensure that a physical inventory of property purchased with federal funds is conducted and reconciled back to the property records every two years. Views of Responsible Officials See Corrective Action Plan.
Finding Number: 2024‐002 Repeat Finding: No Program Name/Assistance Listing Title: Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listing Number: 84.425 Federal Agency: U.S Department of Education Federal Award Numbers: S425D210038, S425U210038 Pass‐Through Agency: Arizona Department of Education Questioned Costs: N/A Type of Finding: Noncompliance, Significant Deficiency Compliance Requirement: Equipment and Real Property Management Criteria District management is responsible for establishing and maintaining internal control over the District’s accounting records and financial reporting in order to meet financial reporting objectives of the District. CFR 200.313 requires a physical inventory, of property purchased with federal funds, must be completed and reconciled with the property records every two years. The Uniform System of Financial Records (USFR) prescribes required procedures in the areas of capital assets including an inventory at least every three years. Condition The District lacked adequate financial controls over capital assets. Cause District and Federal policies and internal controls in place were not always operating effectively or were not always followed. Effect The District was not in compliance with CFR 200.313. Context During our review of the District’s capital assets, we noted that the District has not performed a physical inventory and reconciliation over stewardship and capital assets since fiscal year 2016‐17. The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendation The District should appoint an individual to ensure that a physical inventory of property purchased with federal funds is conducted and reconciled back to the property records every two years. Views of Responsible Officials See Corrective Action Plan.
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY IN INTERNAL CONTROL OVER COMPLIANCE – PASSED THROUGH MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION – COVID-19 – EDUCATION STABILIZATION FUND (FEDERAL ALN 84.425) 2024-006 Internal Control Over Compliance With Equipment and Real Property Management Requirements Criteria – 2 CFR § 200.313(d)(1) requires Universal Academy (the Academy) to designate fixed assets purchased under federal programs and to maintain related property records, including a description of the property, a serial number or other unique identification number, the source of funding for the property (including the federal Assistance Listing Number), who holds title, the acquisition date, cost of the property, percentage of federal participation in the project costs for the federal award under which the property was acquired, the location, use, and condition of the property, and any ultimate disposition data, including the date of disposal and sale price of the property. Condition – During our prior year audit, we noted that the Academy did not have sufficient controls in place within the COVID-19 – Education Stabilization Fund federal program to specifically identify federally-funded fixed assets and maintain the required records, as noted above, to assure compliance with federal equipment and real property management requirements. The Academy was responsible for submitting a Corrective Action Plan to the MDE to rectify this finding, but none was submitted. Questioned Costs – Not applicable. Context – A population of one applicable fixed asset purchased with federal awards was noted during the course of our audit in the prior year. This was not a statistically valid sample. The Academy did not submit a Corrective Action Plan to the MDE. Repeat Finding – This is a current year and prior year finding. Cause – The Academy did not did not have a system in place for specifically identifying federally-funded fixed assets and maintaining the required records as noted above. Effect – This could be viewed as a violation of the award agreement. Recommendation – We recommend that the Academy review its internal control procedures to ensure future compliance with the federal compliance requirements specific to equipment and real property management for the COVID-19 – Education Stabilization Fund federal program. View of Responsible Official and Planned Corrective Actions – The Academy agrees with the finding. The Academy intends to review its control procedures relating to equipment and real property management requirements to ensure compliance for future federal awards expenditures. The Academy has separately issued a Corrective Action Plan related to this finding.
Federal Program: ALN 93.600 Head Start Category: Compliance/internal control significant deficiency Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Condition: BGCPR real and personal property records are not complete and did not follow the program requirements. Additionally, prior approval from the Head Start program was not requested for some acquisitions. Criteria: 2 CFR §200.313 (d) establishes that in the management requirements of equipment that regardless of whether equipment is acquired in part or its entirety under the Federal award, the recipient or subrecipient must manage equipment (including replacement equipment) utilizing procedures that meet the following requirements: (1) Property records must include a description of the property, a serial number or another identification number, the source of funding for the property (including the Federal Award Identification Number), the title holder, the acquisition date, the cost of the property, the percentage of the Federal agency contribution towards the original purchase, the location, use and condition of the property, and any disposition data including the date of disposal and sale price of the property. The recipient and subrecipient are responsible for maintaining and updating property records when there is a change in the status of the property. 2 CFR §200.1 defines equipment as a tangible personal property (including information technology systems) having a useful life of more than one year and a per-unit acquisition cost which equals or exceeds the lesser of the capitalization level established by the non-Federal entity for financial statement purposes, or $5,000.Under U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP), the acquisition cost of capital equipment includes all expenses necessary to acquire the asset and prepare it for its intended use. This encompasses the purchase price, import duties, freight and handling charges, installation and assembly costs, site preparation expenses, and professional fees. As per established on BGCPR’s policy of Property and Equipment, the BGCPR will capitalize all items that have a unit cost greater than five thousand dollars ($5,000). Cause: BGCPR did not maintain essential details, such as acquisition costs, funding sources, or the Federal Award Identification Numbers, nor did it obtain the necessary prior approvals from the Head Start program for these acquisitions. Effect or potential effect: Failure to capitalize property and equipment and obtain the necessary approvals to comply with the federal regulations. Questioned Costs: Amount is below the threshold to be considered a questioned cost. Context: Upon reviewing 32 instances, two errors were found where BGCPR failed to properly account for equipment acquisitions exceeding $5,000. Recommendation: BGCPR must identify all properties acquired with Federal funds and maintain adequate accounting records in accordance with Federal regulations. The program must maintain an automated accounting and record keeping system adequate for effective oversight. Additionally, establish a robust internal control system to ensure all equipment purchases exceeding $5,000 are properly capitalized and that prior approvals are obtained. Views of responsible officials: BGCPR recognizes that it must keep and improve the asset capitalization processes and policies, particularly within the accounting system of record. It acknowledges the need to strengthen these processes to ensure accurate and compliant management of equipment acquisitions. To address this, BGCPR will implement a system capable of recording, classifying, and monitoring all capital assets in alignment with the criteria established under federal regulation 2 CFR §200. This improvement is essential to ensure that all asset capitalization activities meet regulatory standards and support greater financial transparency and accountability. As a corrective measure, BGCPR will take the following actions and will anticipate completing on June 30, 2025: a. Implement and maintain an automated accounting and financial records system to enable real-time oversight of the asset capitalization policy. b. Establish a robust internal control framework including pre-approvals for equipment purchases and cross-validations of financial data. c. Periodic internal monitoring’s to ensure compliance and documentation.d. Update BGCPR’s fiscal management guidance to include a formal provision requiring the capitalization policy to be reviewed every three (3) years in compliance with the ensure compliance with federal regulation 2 CFR §200 regarding asset capitalization criteria. e. Conduct a training program for accounting and financial personnel.
Finding No.: 2024-003- Equipment – Material weakness and material non-compliance Federal Agency: Various Program Name: Research and Development Cluster ALN Number: Various Federal Award Year: July 1, 2023 – June 30, 2024 Criteria Institutions with federally acquired research and development equipment must adhere to specific guidelines outlined in 2 CFR 200.313. This regulation mandates that entities conduct bi-annual inventory counts of federally acquired equipment to ensure accurate tracking and accountability. It requires maintaining detailed records of all equipment, including acquisition date, cost, location, and current status, to reflect any changes or discrepancies following each inventory count .Additionally, the regulation specifies procedures for the appropriate disposal of federally acquired equipment that is no longer needed or has reached the end of its useful life. Entities must request disposal instructions from the federal awarding agency and ensure that disposal methods comply with federal regulations, including obtaining necessary approvals and documenting the disposal process.Furthermore, in accordance with 2 CFR 200.303(a), non-Federal entities must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance withthe guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Conditions Found During our audit, we sampled and tested the equipment listing and discovered that 1 out of 11samples selected for testing could not be located while on site at Union College as the equipmentitem's actual storage location had not been updated in the College's master listing appropriately.Additionally, we were informed that the equipment is no longer functional and should have been disposed of, but it had not been, showing a failure to maintain accurate records of federally acquired equipment and dispose of equipment according to compliance requirements. Cause: The cause of the condition found that the College did not follow its policies to conduct a physical inventory count, resulting in discrepancies in the equipment listing as well as a lack of formally written policies and procedures to update and report changes in equipment status at the College. Possible Asserted Effect: The inability to locate equipment and improper disposal practices compromise the integrity of inventory management. Moreover, the absence of formal policies could result in federal noncompliance. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs were identified. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding: The conditions found do not constitute a repeat finding from the prior year. Recommendation: We recommend that management perform a thorough physical inventory audit to locate all equipmentand update the master equipment listing with accurate details, including current locations and statuses .Additionally, we recommend the institution review and regularly circulate a formal plan for the appropriate disposal of non-functional or obsolete equipment. This plan should include obtaining necessary approvals and documenting the disposal process as per federal guidelines. Views of Responsible Officials: Recommendation accepted.
Finding No.: 2024-003- Equipment – Material weakness and material non-compliance Federal Agency: Various Program Name: Research and Development Cluster ALN Number: Various Federal Award Year: July 1, 2023 – June 30, 2024 Criteria Institutions with federally acquired research and development equipment must adhere to specific guidelines outlined in 2 CFR 200.313. This regulation mandates that entities conduct bi-annual inventory counts of federally acquired equipment to ensure accurate tracking and accountability. It requires maintaining detailed records of all equipment, including acquisition date, cost, location, and current status, to reflect any changes or discrepancies following each inventory count .Additionally, the regulation specifies procedures for the appropriate disposal of federally acquired equipment that is no longer needed or has reached the end of its useful life. Entities must request disposal instructions from the federal awarding agency and ensure that disposal methods comply with federal regulations, including obtaining necessary approvals and documenting the disposal process.Furthermore, in accordance with 2 CFR 200.303(a), non-Federal entities must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance withthe guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Conditions Found During our audit, we sampled and tested the equipment listing and discovered that 1 out of 11samples selected for testing could not be located while on site at Union College as the equipmentitem's actual storage location had not been updated in the College's master listing appropriately.Additionally, we were informed that the equipment is no longer functional and should have been disposed of, but it had not been, showing a failure to maintain accurate records of federally acquired equipment and dispose of equipment according to compliance requirements. Cause: The cause of the condition found that the College did not follow its policies to conduct a physical inventory count, resulting in discrepancies in the equipment listing as well as a lack of formally written policies and procedures to update and report changes in equipment status at the College. Possible Asserted Effect: The inability to locate equipment and improper disposal practices compromise the integrity of inventory management. Moreover, the absence of formal policies could result in federal noncompliance. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs were identified. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding: The conditions found do not constitute a repeat finding from the prior year. Recommendation: We recommend that management perform a thorough physical inventory audit to locate all equipmentand update the master equipment listing with accurate details, including current locations and statuses .Additionally, we recommend the institution review and regularly circulate a formal plan for the appropriate disposal of non-functional or obsolete equipment. This plan should include obtaining necessary approvals and documenting the disposal process as per federal guidelines. Views of Responsible Officials: Recommendation accepted.
Finding No.: 2024-003- Equipment – Material weakness and material non-compliance Federal Agency: Various Program Name: Research and Development Cluster ALN Number: Various Federal Award Year: July 1, 2023 – June 30, 2024 Criteria Institutions with federally acquired research and development equipment must adhere to specific guidelines outlined in 2 CFR 200.313. This regulation mandates that entities conduct bi-annual inventory counts of federally acquired equipment to ensure accurate tracking and accountability. It requires maintaining detailed records of all equipment, including acquisition date, cost, location, and current status, to reflect any changes or discrepancies following each inventory count .Additionally, the regulation specifies procedures for the appropriate disposal of federally acquired equipment that is no longer needed or has reached the end of its useful life. Entities must request disposal instructions from the federal awarding agency and ensure that disposal methods comply with federal regulations, including obtaining necessary approvals and documenting the disposal process.Furthermore, in accordance with 2 CFR 200.303(a), non-Federal entities must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance withthe guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Conditions Found During our audit, we sampled and tested the equipment listing and discovered that 1 out of 11samples selected for testing could not be located while on site at Union College as the equipmentitem's actual storage location had not been updated in the College's master listing appropriately.Additionally, we were informed that the equipment is no longer functional and should have been disposed of, but it had not been, showing a failure to maintain accurate records of federally acquired equipment and dispose of equipment according to compliance requirements. Cause: The cause of the condition found that the College did not follow its policies to conduct a physical inventory count, resulting in discrepancies in the equipment listing as well as a lack of formally written policies and procedures to update and report changes in equipment status at the College. Possible Asserted Effect: The inability to locate equipment and improper disposal practices compromise the integrity of inventory management. Moreover, the absence of formal policies could result in federal noncompliance. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs were identified. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding: The conditions found do not constitute a repeat finding from the prior year. Recommendation: We recommend that management perform a thorough physical inventory audit to locate all equipmentand update the master equipment listing with accurate details, including current locations and statuses .Additionally, we recommend the institution review and regularly circulate a formal plan for the appropriate disposal of non-functional or obsolete equipment. This plan should include obtaining necessary approvals and documenting the disposal process as per federal guidelines. Views of Responsible Officials: Recommendation accepted.
Finding No.: 2024-003- Equipment – Material weakness and material non-compliance Federal Agency: Various Program Name: Research and Development Cluster ALN Number: Various Federal Award Year: July 1, 2023 – June 30, 2024 Criteria Institutions with federally acquired research and development equipment must adhere to specific guidelines outlined in 2 CFR 200.313. This regulation mandates that entities conduct bi-annual inventory counts of federally acquired equipment to ensure accurate tracking and accountability. It requires maintaining detailed records of all equipment, including acquisition date, cost, location, and current status, to reflect any changes or discrepancies following each inventory count .Additionally, the regulation specifies procedures for the appropriate disposal of federally acquired equipment that is no longer needed or has reached the end of its useful life. Entities must request disposal instructions from the federal awarding agency and ensure that disposal methods comply with federal regulations, including obtaining necessary approvals and documenting the disposal process.Furthermore, in accordance with 2 CFR 200.303(a), non-Federal entities must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance withthe guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Conditions Found During our audit, we sampled and tested the equipment listing and discovered that 1 out of 11samples selected for testing could not be located while on site at Union College as the equipmentitem's actual storage location had not been updated in the College's master listing appropriately.Additionally, we were informed that the equipment is no longer functional and should have been disposed of, but it had not been, showing a failure to maintain accurate records of federally acquired equipment and dispose of equipment according to compliance requirements. Cause: The cause of the condition found that the College did not follow its policies to conduct a physical inventory count, resulting in discrepancies in the equipment listing as well as a lack of formally written policies and procedures to update and report changes in equipment status at the College. Possible Asserted Effect: The inability to locate equipment and improper disposal practices compromise the integrity of inventory management. Moreover, the absence of formal policies could result in federal noncompliance. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs were identified. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding: The conditions found do not constitute a repeat finding from the prior year. Recommendation: We recommend that management perform a thorough physical inventory audit to locate all equipmentand update the master equipment listing with accurate details, including current locations and statuses .Additionally, we recommend the institution review and regularly circulate a formal plan for the appropriate disposal of non-functional or obsolete equipment. This plan should include obtaining necessary approvals and documenting the disposal process as per federal guidelines. Views of Responsible Officials: Recommendation accepted.
Finding No.: 2024-003- Equipment – Material weakness and material non-compliance Federal Agency: Various Program Name: Research and Development Cluster ALN Number: Various Federal Award Year: July 1, 2023 – June 30, 2024 Criteria Institutions with federally acquired research and development equipment must adhere to specific guidelines outlined in 2 CFR 200.313. This regulation mandates that entities conduct bi-annual inventory counts of federally acquired equipment to ensure accurate tracking and accountability. It requires maintaining detailed records of all equipment, including acquisition date, cost, location, and current status, to reflect any changes or discrepancies following each inventory count .Additionally, the regulation specifies procedures for the appropriate disposal of federally acquired equipment that is no longer needed or has reached the end of its useful life. Entities must request disposal instructions from the federal awarding agency and ensure that disposal methods comply with federal regulations, including obtaining necessary approvals and documenting the disposal process.Furthermore, in accordance with 2 CFR 200.303(a), non-Federal entities must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance withthe guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Conditions Found During our audit, we sampled and tested the equipment listing and discovered that 1 out of 11samples selected for testing could not be located while on site at Union College as the equipmentitem's actual storage location had not been updated in the College's master listing appropriately.Additionally, we were informed that the equipment is no longer functional and should have been disposed of, but it had not been, showing a failure to maintain accurate records of federally acquired equipment and dispose of equipment according to compliance requirements. Cause: The cause of the condition found that the College did not follow its policies to conduct a physical inventory count, resulting in discrepancies in the equipment listing as well as a lack of formally written policies and procedures to update and report changes in equipment status at the College. Possible Asserted Effect: The inability to locate equipment and improper disposal practices compromise the integrity of inventory management. Moreover, the absence of formal policies could result in federal noncompliance. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs were identified. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding: The conditions found do not constitute a repeat finding from the prior year. Recommendation: We recommend that management perform a thorough physical inventory audit to locate all equipmentand update the master equipment listing with accurate details, including current locations and statuses .Additionally, we recommend the institution review and regularly circulate a formal plan for the appropriate disposal of non-functional or obsolete equipment. This plan should include obtaining necessary approvals and documenting the disposal process as per federal guidelines. Views of Responsible Officials: Recommendation accepted.
Finding No.: 2024-003- Equipment – Material weakness and material non-compliance Federal Agency: Various Program Name: Research and Development Cluster ALN Number: Various Federal Award Year: July 1, 2023 – June 30, 2024 Criteria Institutions with federally acquired research and development equipment must adhere to specific guidelines outlined in 2 CFR 200.313. This regulation mandates that entities conduct bi-annual inventory counts of federally acquired equipment to ensure accurate tracking and accountability. It requires maintaining detailed records of all equipment, including acquisition date, cost, location, and current status, to reflect any changes or discrepancies following each inventory count .Additionally, the regulation specifies procedures for the appropriate disposal of federally acquired equipment that is no longer needed or has reached the end of its useful life. Entities must request disposal instructions from the federal awarding agency and ensure that disposal methods comply with federal regulations, including obtaining necessary approvals and documenting the disposal process.Furthermore, in accordance with 2 CFR 200.303(a), non-Federal entities must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance withthe guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Conditions Found During our audit, we sampled and tested the equipment listing and discovered that 1 out of 11samples selected for testing could not be located while on site at Union College as the equipmentitem's actual storage location had not been updated in the College's master listing appropriately.Additionally, we were informed that the equipment is no longer functional and should have been disposed of, but it had not been, showing a failure to maintain accurate records of federally acquired equipment and dispose of equipment according to compliance requirements. Cause: The cause of the condition found that the College did not follow its policies to conduct a physical inventory count, resulting in discrepancies in the equipment listing as well as a lack of formally written policies and procedures to update and report changes in equipment status at the College. Possible Asserted Effect: The inability to locate equipment and improper disposal practices compromise the integrity of inventory management. Moreover, the absence of formal policies could result in federal noncompliance. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs were identified. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding: The conditions found do not constitute a repeat finding from the prior year. Recommendation: We recommend that management perform a thorough physical inventory audit to locate all equipmentand update the master equipment listing with accurate details, including current locations and statuses .Additionally, we recommend the institution review and regularly circulate a formal plan for the appropriate disposal of non-functional or obsolete equipment. This plan should include obtaining necessary approvals and documenting the disposal process as per federal guidelines. Views of Responsible Officials: Recommendation accepted.
Finding No.: 2024-003- Equipment – Material weakness and material non-compliance Federal Agency: Various Program Name: Research and Development Cluster ALN Number: Various Federal Award Year: July 1, 2023 – June 30, 2024 Criteria Institutions with federally acquired research and development equipment must adhere to specific guidelines outlined in 2 CFR 200.313. This regulation mandates that entities conduct bi-annual inventory counts of federally acquired equipment to ensure accurate tracking and accountability. It requires maintaining detailed records of all equipment, including acquisition date, cost, location, and current status, to reflect any changes or discrepancies following each inventory count .Additionally, the regulation specifies procedures for the appropriate disposal of federally acquired equipment that is no longer needed or has reached the end of its useful life. Entities must request disposal instructions from the federal awarding agency and ensure that disposal methods comply with federal regulations, including obtaining necessary approvals and documenting the disposal process.Furthermore, in accordance with 2 CFR 200.303(a), non-Federal entities must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance withthe guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Conditions Found During our audit, we sampled and tested the equipment listing and discovered that 1 out of 11samples selected for testing could not be located while on site at Union College as the equipmentitem's actual storage location had not been updated in the College's master listing appropriately.Additionally, we were informed that the equipment is no longer functional and should have been disposed of, but it had not been, showing a failure to maintain accurate records of federally acquired equipment and dispose of equipment according to compliance requirements. Cause: The cause of the condition found that the College did not follow its policies to conduct a physical inventory count, resulting in discrepancies in the equipment listing as well as a lack of formally written policies and procedures to update and report changes in equipment status at the College. Possible Asserted Effect: The inability to locate equipment and improper disposal practices compromise the integrity of inventory management. Moreover, the absence of formal policies could result in federal noncompliance. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs were identified. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding: The conditions found do not constitute a repeat finding from the prior year. Recommendation: We recommend that management perform a thorough physical inventory audit to locate all equipmentand update the master equipment listing with accurate details, including current locations and statuses .Additionally, we recommend the institution review and regularly circulate a formal plan for the appropriate disposal of non-functional or obsolete equipment. This plan should include obtaining necessary approvals and documenting the disposal process as per federal guidelines. Views of Responsible Officials: Recommendation accepted.
Finding No.: 2024-003- Equipment – Material weakness and material non-compliance Federal Agency: Various Program Name: Research and Development Cluster ALN Number: Various Federal Award Year: July 1, 2023 – June 30, 2024 Criteria Institutions with federally acquired research and development equipment must adhere to specific guidelines outlined in 2 CFR 200.313. This regulation mandates that entities conduct bi-annual inventory counts of federally acquired equipment to ensure accurate tracking and accountability. It requires maintaining detailed records of all equipment, including acquisition date, cost, location, and current status, to reflect any changes or discrepancies following each inventory count .Additionally, the regulation specifies procedures for the appropriate disposal of federally acquired equipment that is no longer needed or has reached the end of its useful life. Entities must request disposal instructions from the federal awarding agency and ensure that disposal methods comply with federal regulations, including obtaining necessary approvals and documenting the disposal process.Furthermore, in accordance with 2 CFR 200.303(a), non-Federal entities must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance withthe guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Conditions Found During our audit, we sampled and tested the equipment listing and discovered that 1 out of 11samples selected for testing could not be located while on site at Union College as the equipmentitem's actual storage location had not been updated in the College's master listing appropriately.Additionally, we were informed that the equipment is no longer functional and should have been disposed of, but it had not been, showing a failure to maintain accurate records of federally acquired equipment and dispose of equipment according to compliance requirements. Cause: The cause of the condition found that the College did not follow its policies to conduct a physical inventory count, resulting in discrepancies in the equipment listing as well as a lack of formally written policies and procedures to update and report changes in equipment status at the College. Possible Asserted Effect: The inability to locate equipment and improper disposal practices compromise the integrity of inventory management. Moreover, the absence of formal policies could result in federal noncompliance. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs were identified. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding: The conditions found do not constitute a repeat finding from the prior year. Recommendation: We recommend that management perform a thorough physical inventory audit to locate all equipmentand update the master equipment listing with accurate details, including current locations and statuses .Additionally, we recommend the institution review and regularly circulate a formal plan for the appropriate disposal of non-functional or obsolete equipment. This plan should include obtaining necessary approvals and documenting the disposal process as per federal guidelines. Views of Responsible Officials: Recommendation accepted.
Finding No.: 2024-003- Equipment – Material weakness and material non-compliance Federal Agency: Various Program Name: Research and Development Cluster ALN Number: Various Federal Award Year: July 1, 2023 – June 30, 2024 Criteria Institutions with federally acquired research and development equipment must adhere to specific guidelines outlined in 2 CFR 200.313. This regulation mandates that entities conduct bi-annual inventory counts of federally acquired equipment to ensure accurate tracking and accountability. It requires maintaining detailed records of all equipment, including acquisition date, cost, location, and current status, to reflect any changes or discrepancies following each inventory count .Additionally, the regulation specifies procedures for the appropriate disposal of federally acquired equipment that is no longer needed or has reached the end of its useful life. Entities must request disposal instructions from the federal awarding agency and ensure that disposal methods comply with federal regulations, including obtaining necessary approvals and documenting the disposal process.Furthermore, in accordance with 2 CFR 200.303(a), non-Federal entities must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance withthe guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Conditions Found During our audit, we sampled and tested the equipment listing and discovered that 1 out of 11samples selected for testing could not be located while on site at Union College as the equipmentitem's actual storage location had not been updated in the College's master listing appropriately.Additionally, we were informed that the equipment is no longer functional and should have been disposed of, but it had not been, showing a failure to maintain accurate records of federally acquired equipment and dispose of equipment according to compliance requirements. Cause: The cause of the condition found that the College did not follow its policies to conduct a physical inventory count, resulting in discrepancies in the equipment listing as well as a lack of formally written policies and procedures to update and report changes in equipment status at the College. Possible Asserted Effect: The inability to locate equipment and improper disposal practices compromise the integrity of inventory management. Moreover, the absence of formal policies could result in federal noncompliance. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs were identified. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding: The conditions found do not constitute a repeat finding from the prior year. Recommendation: We recommend that management perform a thorough physical inventory audit to locate all equipmentand update the master equipment listing with accurate details, including current locations and statuses .Additionally, we recommend the institution review and regularly circulate a formal plan for the appropriate disposal of non-functional or obsolete equipment. This plan should include obtaining necessary approvals and documenting the disposal process as per federal guidelines. Views of Responsible Officials: Recommendation accepted.
Finding No.: 2024-003- Equipment – Material weakness and material non-compliance Federal Agency: Various Program Name: Research and Development Cluster ALN Number: Various Federal Award Year: July 1, 2023 – June 30, 2024 Criteria Institutions with federally acquired research and development equipment must adhere to specific guidelines outlined in 2 CFR 200.313. This regulation mandates that entities conduct bi-annual inventory counts of federally acquired equipment to ensure accurate tracking and accountability. It requires maintaining detailed records of all equipment, including acquisition date, cost, location, and current status, to reflect any changes or discrepancies following each inventory count .Additionally, the regulation specifies procedures for the appropriate disposal of federally acquired equipment that is no longer needed or has reached the end of its useful life. Entities must request disposal instructions from the federal awarding agency and ensure that disposal methods comply with federal regulations, including obtaining necessary approvals and documenting the disposal process.Furthermore, in accordance with 2 CFR 200.303(a), non-Federal entities must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance withthe guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Conditions Found During our audit, we sampled and tested the equipment listing and discovered that 1 out of 11samples selected for testing could not be located while on site at Union College as the equipmentitem's actual storage location had not been updated in the College's master listing appropriately.Additionally, we were informed that the equipment is no longer functional and should have been disposed of, but it had not been, showing a failure to maintain accurate records of federally acquired equipment and dispose of equipment according to compliance requirements. Cause: The cause of the condition found that the College did not follow its policies to conduct a physical inventory count, resulting in discrepancies in the equipment listing as well as a lack of formally written policies and procedures to update and report changes in equipment status at the College. Possible Asserted Effect: The inability to locate equipment and improper disposal practices compromise the integrity of inventory management. Moreover, the absence of formal policies could result in federal noncompliance. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs were identified. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding: The conditions found do not constitute a repeat finding from the prior year. Recommendation: We recommend that management perform a thorough physical inventory audit to locate all equipmentand update the master equipment listing with accurate details, including current locations and statuses .Additionally, we recommend the institution review and regularly circulate a formal plan for the appropriate disposal of non-functional or obsolete equipment. This plan should include obtaining necessary approvals and documenting the disposal process as per federal guidelines. Views of Responsible Officials: Recommendation accepted.
Finding No.: 2024-003- Equipment – Material weakness and material non-compliance Federal Agency: Various Program Name: Research and Development Cluster ALN Number: Various Federal Award Year: July 1, 2023 – June 30, 2024 Criteria Institutions with federally acquired research and development equipment must adhere to specific guidelines outlined in 2 CFR 200.313. This regulation mandates that entities conduct bi-annual inventory counts of federally acquired equipment to ensure accurate tracking and accountability. It requires maintaining detailed records of all equipment, including acquisition date, cost, location, and current status, to reflect any changes or discrepancies following each inventory count .Additionally, the regulation specifies procedures for the appropriate disposal of federally acquired equipment that is no longer needed or has reached the end of its useful life. Entities must request disposal instructions from the federal awarding agency and ensure that disposal methods comply with federal regulations, including obtaining necessary approvals and documenting the disposal process.Furthermore, in accordance with 2 CFR 200.303(a), non-Federal entities must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance withthe guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Conditions Found During our audit, we sampled and tested the equipment listing and discovered that 1 out of 11samples selected for testing could not be located while on site at Union College as the equipmentitem's actual storage location had not been updated in the College's master listing appropriately.Additionally, we were informed that the equipment is no longer functional and should have been disposed of, but it had not been, showing a failure to maintain accurate records of federally acquired equipment and dispose of equipment according to compliance requirements. Cause: The cause of the condition found that the College did not follow its policies to conduct a physical inventory count, resulting in discrepancies in the equipment listing as well as a lack of formally written policies and procedures to update and report changes in equipment status at the College. Possible Asserted Effect: The inability to locate equipment and improper disposal practices compromise the integrity of inventory management. Moreover, the absence of formal policies could result in federal noncompliance. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs were identified. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding: The conditions found do not constitute a repeat finding from the prior year. Recommendation: We recommend that management perform a thorough physical inventory audit to locate all equipmentand update the master equipment listing with accurate details, including current locations and statuses .Additionally, we recommend the institution review and regularly circulate a formal plan for the appropriate disposal of non-functional or obsolete equipment. This plan should include obtaining necessary approvals and documenting the disposal process as per federal guidelines. Views of Responsible Officials: Recommendation accepted.
Finding No.: 2024-003- Equipment – Material weakness and material non-compliance Federal Agency: Various Program Name: Research and Development Cluster ALN Number: Various Federal Award Year: July 1, 2023 – June 30, 2024 Criteria Institutions with federally acquired research and development equipment must adhere to specific guidelines outlined in 2 CFR 200.313. This regulation mandates that entities conduct bi-annual inventory counts of federally acquired equipment to ensure accurate tracking and accountability. It requires maintaining detailed records of all equipment, including acquisition date, cost, location, and current status, to reflect any changes or discrepancies following each inventory count .Additionally, the regulation specifies procedures for the appropriate disposal of federally acquired equipment that is no longer needed or has reached the end of its useful life. Entities must request disposal instructions from the federal awarding agency and ensure that disposal methods comply with federal regulations, including obtaining necessary approvals and documenting the disposal process.Furthermore, in accordance with 2 CFR 200.303(a), non-Federal entities must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance withthe guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Conditions Found During our audit, we sampled and tested the equipment listing and discovered that 1 out of 11samples selected for testing could not be located while on site at Union College as the equipmentitem's actual storage location had not been updated in the College's master listing appropriately.Additionally, we were informed that the equipment is no longer functional and should have been disposed of, but it had not been, showing a failure to maintain accurate records of federally acquired equipment and dispose of equipment according to compliance requirements. Cause: The cause of the condition found that the College did not follow its policies to conduct a physical inventory count, resulting in discrepancies in the equipment listing as well as a lack of formally written policies and procedures to update and report changes in equipment status at the College. Possible Asserted Effect: The inability to locate equipment and improper disposal practices compromise the integrity of inventory management. Moreover, the absence of formal policies could result in federal noncompliance. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs were identified. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding: The conditions found do not constitute a repeat finding from the prior year. Recommendation: We recommend that management perform a thorough physical inventory audit to locate all equipmentand update the master equipment listing with accurate details, including current locations and statuses .Additionally, we recommend the institution review and regularly circulate a formal plan for the appropriate disposal of non-functional or obsolete equipment. This plan should include obtaining necessary approvals and documenting the disposal process as per federal guidelines. Views of Responsible Officials: Recommendation accepted.
Finding No.: 2024-003- Equipment – Material weakness and material non-compliance Federal Agency: Various Program Name: Research and Development Cluster ALN Number: Various Federal Award Year: July 1, 2023 – June 30, 2024 Criteria Institutions with federally acquired research and development equipment must adhere to specific guidelines outlined in 2 CFR 200.313. This regulation mandates that entities conduct bi-annual inventory counts of federally acquired equipment to ensure accurate tracking and accountability. It requires maintaining detailed records of all equipment, including acquisition date, cost, location, and current status, to reflect any changes or discrepancies following each inventory count .Additionally, the regulation specifies procedures for the appropriate disposal of federally acquired equipment that is no longer needed or has reached the end of its useful life. Entities must request disposal instructions from the federal awarding agency and ensure that disposal methods comply with federal regulations, including obtaining necessary approvals and documenting the disposal process.Furthermore, in accordance with 2 CFR 200.303(a), non-Federal entities must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance withthe guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Conditions Found During our audit, we sampled and tested the equipment listing and discovered that 1 out of 11samples selected for testing could not be located while on site at Union College as the equipmentitem's actual storage location had not been updated in the College's master listing appropriately.Additionally, we were informed that the equipment is no longer functional and should have been disposed of, but it had not been, showing a failure to maintain accurate records of federally acquired equipment and dispose of equipment according to compliance requirements. Cause: The cause of the condition found that the College did not follow its policies to conduct a physical inventory count, resulting in discrepancies in the equipment listing as well as a lack of formally written policies and procedures to update and report changes in equipment status at the College. Possible Asserted Effect: The inability to locate equipment and improper disposal practices compromise the integrity of inventory management. Moreover, the absence of formal policies could result in federal noncompliance. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs were identified. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding: The conditions found do not constitute a repeat finding from the prior year. Recommendation: We recommend that management perform a thorough physical inventory audit to locate all equipmentand update the master equipment listing with accurate details, including current locations and statuses .Additionally, we recommend the institution review and regularly circulate a formal plan for the appropriate disposal of non-functional or obsolete equipment. This plan should include obtaining necessary approvals and documenting the disposal process as per federal guidelines. Views of Responsible Officials: Recommendation accepted.
Finding No.: 2024-003- Equipment – Material weakness and material non-compliance Federal Agency: Various Program Name: Research and Development Cluster ALN Number: Various Federal Award Year: July 1, 2023 – June 30, 2024 Criteria Institutions with federally acquired research and development equipment must adhere to specific guidelines outlined in 2 CFR 200.313. This regulation mandates that entities conduct bi-annual inventory counts of federally acquired equipment to ensure accurate tracking and accountability. It requires maintaining detailed records of all equipment, including acquisition date, cost, location, and current status, to reflect any changes or discrepancies following each inventory count .Additionally, the regulation specifies procedures for the appropriate disposal of federally acquired equipment that is no longer needed or has reached the end of its useful life. Entities must request disposal instructions from the federal awarding agency and ensure that disposal methods comply with federal regulations, including obtaining necessary approvals and documenting the disposal process.Furthermore, in accordance with 2 CFR 200.303(a), non-Federal entities must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance withthe guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Conditions Found During our audit, we sampled and tested the equipment listing and discovered that 1 out of 11samples selected for testing could not be located while on site at Union College as the equipmentitem's actual storage location had not been updated in the College's master listing appropriately.Additionally, we were informed that the equipment is no longer functional and should have been disposed of, but it had not been, showing a failure to maintain accurate records of federally acquired equipment and dispose of equipment according to compliance requirements. Cause: The cause of the condition found that the College did not follow its policies to conduct a physical inventory count, resulting in discrepancies in the equipment listing as well as a lack of formally written policies and procedures to update and report changes in equipment status at the College. Possible Asserted Effect: The inability to locate equipment and improper disposal practices compromise the integrity of inventory management. Moreover, the absence of formal policies could result in federal noncompliance. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs were identified. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding: The conditions found do not constitute a repeat finding from the prior year. Recommendation: We recommend that management perform a thorough physical inventory audit to locate all equipmentand update the master equipment listing with accurate details, including current locations and statuses .Additionally, we recommend the institution review and regularly circulate a formal plan for the appropriate disposal of non-functional or obsolete equipment. This plan should include obtaining necessary approvals and documenting the disposal process as per federal guidelines. Views of Responsible Officials: Recommendation accepted.
Finding No.: 2024-003- Equipment – Material weakness and material non-compliance Federal Agency: Various Program Name: Research and Development Cluster ALN Number: Various Federal Award Year: July 1, 2023 – June 30, 2024 Criteria Institutions with federally acquired research and development equipment must adhere to specific guidelines outlined in 2 CFR 200.313. This regulation mandates that entities conduct bi-annual inventory counts of federally acquired equipment to ensure accurate tracking and accountability. It requires maintaining detailed records of all equipment, including acquisition date, cost, location, and current status, to reflect any changes or discrepancies following each inventory count .Additionally, the regulation specifies procedures for the appropriate disposal of federally acquired equipment that is no longer needed or has reached the end of its useful life. Entities must request disposal instructions from the federal awarding agency and ensure that disposal methods comply with federal regulations, including obtaining necessary approvals and documenting the disposal process.Furthermore, in accordance with 2 CFR 200.303(a), non-Federal entities must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance withthe guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Conditions Found During our audit, we sampled and tested the equipment listing and discovered that 1 out of 11samples selected for testing could not be located while on site at Union College as the equipmentitem's actual storage location had not been updated in the College's master listing appropriately.Additionally, we were informed that the equipment is no longer functional and should have been disposed of, but it had not been, showing a failure to maintain accurate records of federally acquired equipment and dispose of equipment according to compliance requirements. Cause: The cause of the condition found that the College did not follow its policies to conduct a physical inventory count, resulting in discrepancies in the equipment listing as well as a lack of formally written policies and procedures to update and report changes in equipment status at the College. Possible Asserted Effect: The inability to locate equipment and improper disposal practices compromise the integrity of inventory management. Moreover, the absence of formal policies could result in federal noncompliance. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs were identified. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding: The conditions found do not constitute a repeat finding from the prior year. Recommendation: We recommend that management perform a thorough physical inventory audit to locate all equipmentand update the master equipment listing with accurate details, including current locations and statuses .Additionally, we recommend the institution review and regularly circulate a formal plan for the appropriate disposal of non-functional or obsolete equipment. This plan should include obtaining necessary approvals and documenting the disposal process as per federal guidelines. Views of Responsible Officials: Recommendation accepted.
Finding No.: 2024-003- Equipment – Material weakness and material non-compliance Federal Agency: Various Program Name: Research and Development Cluster ALN Number: Various Federal Award Year: July 1, 2023 – June 30, 2024 Criteria Institutions with federally acquired research and development equipment must adhere to specific guidelines outlined in 2 CFR 200.313. This regulation mandates that entities conduct bi-annual inventory counts of federally acquired equipment to ensure accurate tracking and accountability. It requires maintaining detailed records of all equipment, including acquisition date, cost, location, and current status, to reflect any changes or discrepancies following each inventory count .Additionally, the regulation specifies procedures for the appropriate disposal of federally acquired equipment that is no longer needed or has reached the end of its useful life. Entities must request disposal instructions from the federal awarding agency and ensure that disposal methods comply with federal regulations, including obtaining necessary approvals and documenting the disposal process.Furthermore, in accordance with 2 CFR 200.303(a), non-Federal entities must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance withthe guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Conditions Found During our audit, we sampled and tested the equipment listing and discovered that 1 out of 11samples selected for testing could not be located while on site at Union College as the equipmentitem's actual storage location had not been updated in the College's master listing appropriately.Additionally, we were informed that the equipment is no longer functional and should have been disposed of, but it had not been, showing a failure to maintain accurate records of federally acquired equipment and dispose of equipment according to compliance requirements. Cause: The cause of the condition found that the College did not follow its policies to conduct a physical inventory count, resulting in discrepancies in the equipment listing as well as a lack of formally written policies and procedures to update and report changes in equipment status at the College. Possible Asserted Effect: The inability to locate equipment and improper disposal practices compromise the integrity of inventory management. Moreover, the absence of formal policies could result in federal noncompliance. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs were identified. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding: The conditions found do not constitute a repeat finding from the prior year. Recommendation: We recommend that management perform a thorough physical inventory audit to locate all equipmentand update the master equipment listing with accurate details, including current locations and statuses .Additionally, we recommend the institution review and regularly circulate a formal plan for the appropriate disposal of non-functional or obsolete equipment. This plan should include obtaining necessary approvals and documenting the disposal process as per federal guidelines. Views of Responsible Officials: Recommendation accepted.
Finding No.: 2024-003- Equipment – Material weakness and material non-compliance Federal Agency: Various Program Name: Research and Development Cluster ALN Number: Various Federal Award Year: July 1, 2023 – June 30, 2024 Criteria Institutions with federally acquired research and development equipment must adhere to specific guidelines outlined in 2 CFR 200.313. This regulation mandates that entities conduct bi-annual inventory counts of federally acquired equipment to ensure accurate tracking and accountability. It requires maintaining detailed records of all equipment, including acquisition date, cost, location, and current status, to reflect any changes or discrepancies following each inventory count .Additionally, the regulation specifies procedures for the appropriate disposal of federally acquired equipment that is no longer needed or has reached the end of its useful life. Entities must request disposal instructions from the federal awarding agency and ensure that disposal methods comply with federal regulations, including obtaining necessary approvals and documenting the disposal process.Furthermore, in accordance with 2 CFR 200.303(a), non-Federal entities must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance withthe guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Conditions Found During our audit, we sampled and tested the equipment listing and discovered that 1 out of 11samples selected for testing could not be located while on site at Union College as the equipmentitem's actual storage location had not been updated in the College's master listing appropriately.Additionally, we were informed that the equipment is no longer functional and should have been disposed of, but it had not been, showing a failure to maintain accurate records of federally acquired equipment and dispose of equipment according to compliance requirements. Cause: The cause of the condition found that the College did not follow its policies to conduct a physical inventory count, resulting in discrepancies in the equipment listing as well as a lack of formally written policies and procedures to update and report changes in equipment status at the College. Possible Asserted Effect: The inability to locate equipment and improper disposal practices compromise the integrity of inventory management. Moreover, the absence of formal policies could result in federal noncompliance. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs were identified. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding: The conditions found do not constitute a repeat finding from the prior year. Recommendation: We recommend that management perform a thorough physical inventory audit to locate all equipmentand update the master equipment listing with accurate details, including current locations and statuses .Additionally, we recommend the institution review and regularly circulate a formal plan for the appropriate disposal of non-functional or obsolete equipment. This plan should include obtaining necessary approvals and documenting the disposal process as per federal guidelines. Views of Responsible Officials: Recommendation accepted.
Finding No.: 2024-003- Equipment – Material weakness and material non-compliance Federal Agency: Various Program Name: Research and Development Cluster ALN Number: Various Federal Award Year: July 1, 2023 – June 30, 2024 Criteria Institutions with federally acquired research and development equipment must adhere to specific guidelines outlined in 2 CFR 200.313. This regulation mandates that entities conduct bi-annual inventory counts of federally acquired equipment to ensure accurate tracking and accountability. It requires maintaining detailed records of all equipment, including acquisition date, cost, location, and current status, to reflect any changes or discrepancies following each inventory count .Additionally, the regulation specifies procedures for the appropriate disposal of federally acquired equipment that is no longer needed or has reached the end of its useful life. Entities must request disposal instructions from the federal awarding agency and ensure that disposal methods comply with federal regulations, including obtaining necessary approvals and documenting the disposal process.Furthermore, in accordance with 2 CFR 200.303(a), non-Federal entities must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance withthe guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Conditions Found During our audit, we sampled and tested the equipment listing and discovered that 1 out of 11samples selected for testing could not be located while on site at Union College as the equipmentitem's actual storage location had not been updated in the College's master listing appropriately.Additionally, we were informed that the equipment is no longer functional and should have been disposed of, but it had not been, showing a failure to maintain accurate records of federally acquired equipment and dispose of equipment according to compliance requirements. Cause: The cause of the condition found that the College did not follow its policies to conduct a physical inventory count, resulting in discrepancies in the equipment listing as well as a lack of formally written policies and procedures to update and report changes in equipment status at the College. Possible Asserted Effect: The inability to locate equipment and improper disposal practices compromise the integrity of inventory management. Moreover, the absence of formal policies could result in federal noncompliance. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs were identified. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding: The conditions found do not constitute a repeat finding from the prior year. Recommendation: We recommend that management perform a thorough physical inventory audit to locate all equipmentand update the master equipment listing with accurate details, including current locations and statuses .Additionally, we recommend the institution review and regularly circulate a formal plan for the appropriate disposal of non-functional or obsolete equipment. This plan should include obtaining necessary approvals and documenting the disposal process as per federal guidelines. Views of Responsible Officials: Recommendation accepted.
Finding No.: 2024-003- Equipment – Material weakness and material non-compliance Federal Agency: Various Program Name: Research and Development Cluster ALN Number: Various Federal Award Year: July 1, 2023 – June 30, 2024 Criteria Institutions with federally acquired research and development equipment must adhere to specific guidelines outlined in 2 CFR 200.313. This regulation mandates that entities conduct bi-annual inventory counts of federally acquired equipment to ensure accurate tracking and accountability. It requires maintaining detailed records of all equipment, including acquisition date, cost, location, and current status, to reflect any changes or discrepancies following each inventory count .Additionally, the regulation specifies procedures for the appropriate disposal of federally acquired equipment that is no longer needed or has reached the end of its useful life. Entities must request disposal instructions from the federal awarding agency and ensure that disposal methods comply with federal regulations, including obtaining necessary approvals and documenting the disposal process.Furthermore, in accordance with 2 CFR 200.303(a), non-Federal entities must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance withthe guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Conditions Found During our audit, we sampled and tested the equipment listing and discovered that 1 out of 11samples selected for testing could not be located while on site at Union College as the equipmentitem's actual storage location had not been updated in the College's master listing appropriately.Additionally, we were informed that the equipment is no longer functional and should have been disposed of, but it had not been, showing a failure to maintain accurate records of federally acquired equipment and dispose of equipment according to compliance requirements. Cause: The cause of the condition found that the College did not follow its policies to conduct a physical inventory count, resulting in discrepancies in the equipment listing as well as a lack of formally written policies and procedures to update and report changes in equipment status at the College. Possible Asserted Effect: The inability to locate equipment and improper disposal practices compromise the integrity of inventory management. Moreover, the absence of formal policies could result in federal noncompliance. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs were identified. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding: The conditions found do not constitute a repeat finding from the prior year. Recommendation: We recommend that management perform a thorough physical inventory audit to locate all equipmentand update the master equipment listing with accurate details, including current locations and statuses .Additionally, we recommend the institution review and regularly circulate a formal plan for the appropriate disposal of non-functional or obsolete equipment. This plan should include obtaining necessary approvals and documenting the disposal process as per federal guidelines. Views of Responsible Officials: Recommendation accepted.
Finding No.: 2024-003- Equipment – Material weakness and material non-compliance Federal Agency: Various Program Name: Research and Development Cluster ALN Number: Various Federal Award Year: July 1, 2023 – June 30, 2024 Criteria Institutions with federally acquired research and development equipment must adhere to specific guidelines outlined in 2 CFR 200.313. This regulation mandates that entities conduct bi-annual inventory counts of federally acquired equipment to ensure accurate tracking and accountability. It requires maintaining detailed records of all equipment, including acquisition date, cost, location, and current status, to reflect any changes or discrepancies following each inventory count .Additionally, the regulation specifies procedures for the appropriate disposal of federally acquired equipment that is no longer needed or has reached the end of its useful life. Entities must request disposal instructions from the federal awarding agency and ensure that disposal methods comply with federal regulations, including obtaining necessary approvals and documenting the disposal process.Furthermore, in accordance with 2 CFR 200.303(a), non-Federal entities must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance withthe guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Conditions Found During our audit, we sampled and tested the equipment listing and discovered that 1 out of 11samples selected for testing could not be located while on site at Union College as the equipmentitem's actual storage location had not been updated in the College's master listing appropriately.Additionally, we were informed that the equipment is no longer functional and should have been disposed of, but it had not been, showing a failure to maintain accurate records of federally acquired equipment and dispose of equipment according to compliance requirements. Cause: The cause of the condition found that the College did not follow its policies to conduct a physical inventory count, resulting in discrepancies in the equipment listing as well as a lack of formally written policies and procedures to update and report changes in equipment status at the College. Possible Asserted Effect: The inability to locate equipment and improper disposal practices compromise the integrity of inventory management. Moreover, the absence of formal policies could result in federal noncompliance. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs were identified. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding: The conditions found do not constitute a repeat finding from the prior year. Recommendation: We recommend that management perform a thorough physical inventory audit to locate all equipmentand update the master equipment listing with accurate details, including current locations and statuses .Additionally, we recommend the institution review and regularly circulate a formal plan for the appropriate disposal of non-functional or obsolete equipment. This plan should include obtaining necessary approvals and documenting the disposal process as per federal guidelines. Views of Responsible Officials: Recommendation accepted.
Finding No.: 2024-003- Equipment – Material weakness and material non-compliance Federal Agency: Various Program Name: Research and Development Cluster ALN Number: Various Federal Award Year: July 1, 2023 – June 30, 2024 Criteria Institutions with federally acquired research and development equipment must adhere to specific guidelines outlined in 2 CFR 200.313. This regulation mandates that entities conduct bi-annual inventory counts of federally acquired equipment to ensure accurate tracking and accountability. It requires maintaining detailed records of all equipment, including acquisition date, cost, location, and current status, to reflect any changes or discrepancies following each inventory count .Additionally, the regulation specifies procedures for the appropriate disposal of federally acquired equipment that is no longer needed or has reached the end of its useful life. Entities must request disposal instructions from the federal awarding agency and ensure that disposal methods comply with federal regulations, including obtaining necessary approvals and documenting the disposal process.Furthermore, in accordance with 2 CFR 200.303(a), non-Federal entities must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance withthe guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Conditions Found During our audit, we sampled and tested the equipment listing and discovered that 1 out of 11samples selected for testing could not be located while on site at Union College as the equipmentitem's actual storage location had not been updated in the College's master listing appropriately.Additionally, we were informed that the equipment is no longer functional and should have been disposed of, but it had not been, showing a failure to maintain accurate records of federally acquired equipment and dispose of equipment according to compliance requirements. Cause: The cause of the condition found that the College did not follow its policies to conduct a physical inventory count, resulting in discrepancies in the equipment listing as well as a lack of formally written policies and procedures to update and report changes in equipment status at the College. Possible Asserted Effect: The inability to locate equipment and improper disposal practices compromise the integrity of inventory management. Moreover, the absence of formal policies could result in federal noncompliance. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs were identified. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding: The conditions found do not constitute a repeat finding from the prior year. Recommendation: We recommend that management perform a thorough physical inventory audit to locate all equipmentand update the master equipment listing with accurate details, including current locations and statuses .Additionally, we recommend the institution review and regularly circulate a formal plan for the appropriate disposal of non-functional or obsolete equipment. This plan should include obtaining necessary approvals and documenting the disposal process as per federal guidelines. Views of Responsible Officials: Recommendation accepted.
Finding No.: 2024-003- Equipment – Material weakness and material non-compliance Federal Agency: Various Program Name: Research and Development Cluster ALN Number: Various Federal Award Year: July 1, 2023 – June 30, 2024 Criteria Institutions with federally acquired research and development equipment must adhere to specific guidelines outlined in 2 CFR 200.313. This regulation mandates that entities conduct bi-annual inventory counts of federally acquired equipment to ensure accurate tracking and accountability. It requires maintaining detailed records of all equipment, including acquisition date, cost, location, and current status, to reflect any changes or discrepancies following each inventory count .Additionally, the regulation specifies procedures for the appropriate disposal of federally acquired equipment that is no longer needed or has reached the end of its useful life. Entities must request disposal instructions from the federal awarding agency and ensure that disposal methods comply with federal regulations, including obtaining necessary approvals and documenting the disposal process.Furthermore, in accordance with 2 CFR 200.303(a), non-Federal entities must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance withthe guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Conditions Found During our audit, we sampled and tested the equipment listing and discovered that 1 out of 11samples selected for testing could not be located while on site at Union College as the equipmentitem's actual storage location had not been updated in the College's master listing appropriately.Additionally, we were informed that the equipment is no longer functional and should have been disposed of, but it had not been, showing a failure to maintain accurate records of federally acquired equipment and dispose of equipment according to compliance requirements. Cause: The cause of the condition found that the College did not follow its policies to conduct a physical inventory count, resulting in discrepancies in the equipment listing as well as a lack of formally written policies and procedures to update and report changes in equipment status at the College. Possible Asserted Effect: The inability to locate equipment and improper disposal practices compromise the integrity of inventory management. Moreover, the absence of formal policies could result in federal noncompliance. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs were identified. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding: The conditions found do not constitute a repeat finding from the prior year. Recommendation: We recommend that management perform a thorough physical inventory audit to locate all equipmentand update the master equipment listing with accurate details, including current locations and statuses .Additionally, we recommend the institution review and regularly circulate a formal plan for the appropriate disposal of non-functional or obsolete equipment. This plan should include obtaining necessary approvals and documenting the disposal process as per federal guidelines. Views of Responsible Officials: Recommendation accepted.
Finding No.: 2024-003- Equipment – Material weakness and material non-compliance Federal Agency: Various Program Name: Research and Development Cluster ALN Number: Various Federal Award Year: July 1, 2023 – June 30, 2024 Criteria Institutions with federally acquired research and development equipment must adhere to specific guidelines outlined in 2 CFR 200.313. This regulation mandates that entities conduct bi-annual inventory counts of federally acquired equipment to ensure accurate tracking and accountability. It requires maintaining detailed records of all equipment, including acquisition date, cost, location, and current status, to reflect any changes or discrepancies following each inventory count .Additionally, the regulation specifies procedures for the appropriate disposal of federally acquired equipment that is no longer needed or has reached the end of its useful life. Entities must request disposal instructions from the federal awarding agency and ensure that disposal methods comply with federal regulations, including obtaining necessary approvals and documenting the disposal process.Furthermore, in accordance with 2 CFR 200.303(a), non-Federal entities must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance withthe guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Conditions Found During our audit, we sampled and tested the equipment listing and discovered that 1 out of 11samples selected for testing could not be located while on site at Union College as the equipmentitem's actual storage location had not been updated in the College's master listing appropriately.Additionally, we were informed that the equipment is no longer functional and should have been disposed of, but it had not been, showing a failure to maintain accurate records of federally acquired equipment and dispose of equipment according to compliance requirements. Cause: The cause of the condition found that the College did not follow its policies to conduct a physical inventory count, resulting in discrepancies in the equipment listing as well as a lack of formally written policies and procedures to update and report changes in equipment status at the College. Possible Asserted Effect: The inability to locate equipment and improper disposal practices compromise the integrity of inventory management. Moreover, the absence of formal policies could result in federal noncompliance. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs were identified. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding: The conditions found do not constitute a repeat finding from the prior year. Recommendation: We recommend that management perform a thorough physical inventory audit to locate all equipmentand update the master equipment listing with accurate details, including current locations and statuses .Additionally, we recommend the institution review and regularly circulate a formal plan for the appropriate disposal of non-functional or obsolete equipment. This plan should include obtaining necessary approvals and documenting the disposal process as per federal guidelines. Views of Responsible Officials: Recommendation accepted.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION PASSED THROUGH ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION COVID-19 ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY SCHOOL EMERGENCY RELIEF FUND - AL NUMBER 84.425D PASS-THROUGH NUMBER 4605 AUDIT PERIOD - YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2024 2024-001. Equipment and Real Property Management Criteria or specific requirement: Proper records should be maintained for equipment acquired with federal awards as specified in 2 CFR section 200.313. Specifically, the property records must include a serial number or other identification number. Condition: We were unable to verify 3 of 24 Education Stabilization Fund equipment items selected for sighting because serial numbers were not included in the property records, and the equipment items did not have any other identification numbers attached. The cost of the items was $4,428. Cause: Lack of internal controls over capital asset subsidiary records. Effect or potential effect: The District's capital asset subsidiary records were not accurate. Context: Observation of 24 equipment items recorded on equipment subsidiary records at an initial cost of $61,408 from a total population of 242 items at an initial cost of $1,894,302. Identification as a repeat finding: No Recommendation: The District should maintain proper records for equipment acquired with federal awards. Views of responsible officials: The district will develop written fixed/capital asset procedures that will require that all equipment over the capitalization threshold must include serial numbers in property records and be affixed with a unique asset identification tag. We will conduct a full physical inventory of equipment. As part of this process we will record serial numbers for all applicable items, affix asset tags to all untagged equipment, and record proper disposal of assets. We will provide staff training for all relevant staff on asset management procedures and responsibilities.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION MAGNET SCHOOLS ASSISTANCE - AL NUMBER 84.165A AUDIT PERIOD - YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2024 2024-002. Equipment and Real Property Management Criteria or specific requirement: Proper records should be maintained for equipment acquired with federal awards as specified in 2 CFR section 200.313. Additionally, the District should ensure that disposition of such equipment is in accordance with federal requirements, including the federal awarding agency is appropriately compensated for its share of any property sold or converted to non-federal use. Condition: The District could not account for 2 of 25 Magnet School Assistance equipment items purchased in previous years costing $3,383. Cause: Lack of internal controls over capital asset subsidiary records. Effect or potential effect: The District's capital asset subsidiary records were not accurate. Context: Observation of 25 equipment items recorded on equipment subsidiary records at an initial cost of $52,900 from a total population of 1038 items at an initial cost of $3,111,161. Identification as a repeat finding: No Recommendation: The District should maintain proper records for equipment acquired with federal awards. Views of responsible officials: The district will develop written fixed/capital asset procedures that will require that all equipment over the capitalization threshold must include serial numbers in property records and be affixed with a unique asset identification tag. We will conduct a full physical inventory of equipment. As part of this process we will record serial numbers for all applicable items, affix asset tags to all untagged equipment, and record proper disposal of assets. We will provide staff training for all relevant staff on asset management procedures and responsibilities.
Federal Program Name and Year: COVID 19- Educational Stabilization Fund Project No.: 24-4998-E3 AL No.: 84.425U Passed Through: Illinois State Board of Education Federal Agency: United States Department of Education Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory, or other citation): Property records must be maintained that include a description of the property, a serial number or other identification number, the source of funding for the property (including the federal award identification number), who holds title, the acquisition date, cost of the property, percentage of federal participation in the project costs for the federal award under which the property was acquired, the location, use and condition of the property, and any ultimate disposition data including the date of disposal and sales price of the property (2 CFR section 200.313(d)(1)). Condition: The District did not maintain adequate property records to comply with 2 CFR section 200.313(d)(1). Questioned Costs: None Context: The District last updated its property records in 2021. Since 2021, the District has relied upon non-audit services from its accounting firm to assist with compiling capital asset values for external reporting. These non-audit services are not detailed enough to comply with Federal regulations because they are meant to satisfy Accounting Principles Generally Accepted in the United States of America. Effect: The District was out of compliance with Federal Equipment and Real Property Management regulations. Cause: The cause of the condition was a lack of a business office policy and procedure to ensure annual updating of property records, including the tagging and marking of items or Federal origin. Recommendation: It is recommended that the business office establish a policy and procedure to ensure annual updating of property records, including the tagging and marking of items of Federal origin. Management Response: See corrective action plan.