Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Federal Program Name: Special Education Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 84.027 and 84.173 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: H027A160035-2017 Pass-Through Agency: Maryland State Department of Education Pass-Through Number(s): 18052801 Award Period: July 1, 2017 through September 30, 2019 Compliance Requirement: Period of Performance Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance, Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Compliance: A non-federal entity may charge only allowable costs incurred during the approved budget period of a federal award?s period of performance and any costs incurred before the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity made the federal award that were authorized by the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity (2 CFR sections 200.308 200.309 and 200.403(h)). A period of performance may contain one or more budget periods. Control: Per 2 CFR Section 200.303(a), a non-Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should comply with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework?, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition: Costs were incurred and charged to the grant after the allowable end of the period of performance. Questioned costs: Undetermined. Context: One out of thirty-seven grants under this Special Education Cluster had expenditures charged to the grant after the allowable period of performance. Cause: The Board did not have proper internal controls and procedures to ensure that expenditures charged to the grant were incurred within the award?s period of performance. Effect: Costs could be deemed unallowable by the awarding agency if funds are expended outside of the allowable period of performance. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: The Board should review and enhance internal controls and procedures to ensure that it charges expenditures to the program that are incurred within an award?s allowable period of performance. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Federal Program Name: Special Education Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 84.027 and 84.173 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: H027A160035-2017 Pass-Through Agency: Maryland State Department of Education Pass-Through Number(s): 18052801 Award Period: July 1, 2017 through September 30, 2019 Compliance Requirement: Period of Performance Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance, Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Compliance: A non-federal entity may charge only allowable costs incurred during the approved budget period of a federal award?s period of performance and any costs incurred before the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity made the federal award that were authorized by the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity (2 CFR sections 200.308 200.309 and 200.403(h)). A period of performance may contain one or more budget periods. Control: Per 2 CFR Section 200.303(a), a non-Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should comply with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework?, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition: Costs were incurred and charged to the grant after the allowable end of the period of performance. Questioned costs: Undetermined. Context: One out of thirty-seven grants under this Special Education Cluster had expenditures charged to the grant after the allowable period of performance. Cause: The Board did not have proper internal controls and procedures to ensure that expenditures charged to the grant were incurred within the award?s period of performance. Effect: Costs could be deemed unallowable by the awarding agency if funds are expended outside of the allowable period of performance. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: The Board should review and enhance internal controls and procedures to ensure that it charges expenditures to the program that are incurred within an award?s allowable period of performance. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Finding 2022-022 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services AL No. 93.940 HIV Prevention Activities Health Department Based Material Weakness and Noncompliance Over Period of Performance Repeat Finding: Yes Condition: For 10 out of 40 selections, the transactions were incurred outside of the grant?s period of performance. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR ?200.303: The Non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR section 200.309, a non-Federal entity may charge to the Federal award only allowable costs incurred during the period of performance and any costs incurred before the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity made the Federal award that were authorized by the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity. Cause: There was a timing delay at the end of the fiscal year between the agency billing the grant and when the actual expenditure was recorded in the GL system to create the SEFA. Effect: The City was not in compliance with the period of performance requirements. Questioned Costs: $117,153. Recommendation: Management agrees with the finding. We recommend the City establish and implement controls to maintain compliance with reporting requirements. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor?s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Finding 2022-022 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services AL No. 93.940 HIV Prevention Activities Health Department Based Material Weakness and Noncompliance Over Period of Performance Repeat Finding: Yes Condition: For 10 out of 40 selections, the transactions were incurred outside of the grant?s period of performance. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR ?200.303: The Non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR section 200.309, a non-Federal entity may charge to the Federal award only allowable costs incurred during the period of performance and any costs incurred before the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity made the Federal award that were authorized by the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity. Cause: There was a timing delay at the end of the fiscal year between the agency billing the grant and when the actual expenditure was recorded in the GL system to create the SEFA. Effect: The City was not in compliance with the period of performance requirements. Questioned Costs: $117,153. Recommendation: Management agrees with the finding. We recommend the City establish and implement controls to maintain compliance with reporting requirements. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor?s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Finding 2022-022 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services AL No. 93.940 HIV Prevention Activities Health Department Based Material Weakness and Noncompliance Over Period of Performance Repeat Finding: Yes Condition: For 10 out of 40 selections, the transactions were incurred outside of the grant?s period of performance. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR ?200.303: The Non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR section 200.309, a non-Federal entity may charge to the Federal award only allowable costs incurred during the period of performance and any costs incurred before the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity made the Federal award that were authorized by the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity. Cause: There was a timing delay at the end of the fiscal year between the agency billing the grant and when the actual expenditure was recorded in the GL system to create the SEFA. Effect: The City was not in compliance with the period of performance requirements. Questioned Costs: $117,153. Recommendation: Management agrees with the finding. We recommend the City establish and implement controls to maintain compliance with reporting requirements. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor?s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Finding 2022-022 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services AL No. 93.940 HIV Prevention Activities Health Department Based Material Weakness and Noncompliance Over Period of Performance Repeat Finding: Yes Condition: For 10 out of 40 selections, the transactions were incurred outside of the grant?s period of performance. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR ?200.303: The Non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR section 200.309, a non-Federal entity may charge to the Federal award only allowable costs incurred during the period of performance and any costs incurred before the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity made the Federal award that were authorized by the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity. Cause: There was a timing delay at the end of the fiscal year between the agency billing the grant and when the actual expenditure was recorded in the GL system to create the SEFA. Effect: The City was not in compliance with the period of performance requirements. Questioned Costs: $117,153. Recommendation: Management agrees with the finding. We recommend the City establish and implement controls to maintain compliance with reporting requirements. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor?s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Finding 2022-024 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services AL No. 93.977 Sexually Transmitted Diseases (STD) Prevention and Control Grants Significant Deficiency and Noncompliance over Period of Performance Repeat Finding: No Condition: For 4 of 40 expenditure transactions selected for testing, the transactions were incurred outside of the period of the performance for the grant. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR ?200.303: The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. According to 2 CFR section 200.309, a non-Federal entity may charge to the Federal award only allowable costs incurred during the period of performance and any costs incurred before the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity made the Federal award that were authorized by the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity. Cause: There was a timing delay at the end of the fiscal year between the agency billing the grant and when the actual expenditure was recorded in the GL system to create the SEFA. Effect: The City was not in compliance with the period of performance requirements. Questioned Costs: $276,183. Recommendation: We recommend the City establish and implement internal controls that provide reasonable assurance that grant expenditures recorded in the general ledgers are recorded in the proper grant period. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor?s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Finding 2022-024 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services AL No. 93.977 Sexually Transmitted Diseases (STD) Prevention and Control Grants Significant Deficiency and Noncompliance over Period of Performance Repeat Finding: No Condition: For 4 of 40 expenditure transactions selected for testing, the transactions were incurred outside of the period of the performance for the grant. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR ?200.303: The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. According to 2 CFR section 200.309, a non-Federal entity may charge to the Federal award only allowable costs incurred during the period of performance and any costs incurred before the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity made the Federal award that were authorized by the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity. Cause: There was a timing delay at the end of the fiscal year between the agency billing the grant and when the actual expenditure was recorded in the GL system to create the SEFA. Effect: The City was not in compliance with the period of performance requirements. Questioned Costs: $276,183. Recommendation: We recommend the City establish and implement internal controls that provide reasonable assurance that grant expenditures recorded in the general ledgers are recorded in the proper grant period. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor?s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Finding 2022-024 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services AL No. 93.977 Sexually Transmitted Diseases (STD) Prevention and Control Grants Significant Deficiency and Noncompliance over Period of Performance Repeat Finding: No Condition: For 4 of 40 expenditure transactions selected for testing, the transactions were incurred outside of the period of the performance for the grant. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR ?200.303: The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. According to 2 CFR section 200.309, a non-Federal entity may charge to the Federal award only allowable costs incurred during the period of performance and any costs incurred before the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity made the Federal award that were authorized by the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity. Cause: There was a timing delay at the end of the fiscal year between the agency billing the grant and when the actual expenditure was recorded in the GL system to create the SEFA. Effect: The City was not in compliance with the period of performance requirements. Questioned Costs: $276,183. Recommendation: We recommend the City establish and implement internal controls that provide reasonable assurance that grant expenditures recorded in the general ledgers are recorded in the proper grant period. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor?s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Finding 2022-016 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services AL No. 93.767 Children?s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) Material Weakness and Noncompliance Over Period of Performance Repeat Finding: Yes Condition: For 10 out of 60 expenditure transactions selected for testing, the transactions were incurred outside of the period of the performance for the grant. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR ?200.303: The Non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR section 200.309, a non-Federal entity may charge to the Federal award only allowable costs incurred during the period of performance and any costs incurred before the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity made the Federal award that were authorized by the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity. Cause: There was a timing delay at the end of the fiscal year between the agency billing the grant and when the actual expenditure was recorded in the GL system to create the SEFA. Effect: The City may not be in compliance with the period of performance requirements. Questioned Costs: $338,882. Recommendation: We recommend the City establish and implement internal controls that provide reasonable assurance that grant expenditures recorded in the general ledgers were recorded in the proper grant period. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor?s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Finding 2022-016 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services AL No. 93.767 Children?s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) Material Weakness and Noncompliance Over Period of Performance Repeat Finding: Yes Condition: For 10 out of 60 expenditure transactions selected for testing, the transactions were incurred outside of the period of the performance for the grant. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR ?200.303: The Non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR section 200.309, a non-Federal entity may charge to the Federal award only allowable costs incurred during the period of performance and any costs incurred before the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity made the Federal award that were authorized by the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity. Cause: There was a timing delay at the end of the fiscal year between the agency billing the grant and when the actual expenditure was recorded in the GL system to create the SEFA. Effect: The City may not be in compliance with the period of performance requirements. Questioned Costs: $338,882. Recommendation: We recommend the City establish and implement internal controls that provide reasonable assurance that grant expenditures recorded in the general ledgers were recorded in the proper grant period. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor?s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Finding 2022-018 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services AL No. 93.778 Medical Assistance Program (Medicaid; Title XIX) Material Weakness and Noncompliance over Period of Performance Repeat Finding: No Condition: For 22 of 40 expenditure transactions selected for testing, the transactions were incurred outside of the period of the performance for the grant. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR ?200.303: The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR section 200.309, a non-Federal entity may charge to the Federal award only allowable costs incurred during the period of performance and any costs incurred before the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity made the Federal award that were authorized by the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity. Cause: There was a timing delay at the end of the fiscal year between the agency billing the grant and when the actual expenditure was recorded in the GL system to create the SEFA. Effect: Unallowed expenditures could be charged to the grant. Questioned Costs: $201,213. Recommendation: We recommend the City establish and implement internal controls that provide reasonable assurance that grant expenditures recorded in the general ledgers were recorded in the proper grant period. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor?s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Finding 2022-018 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services AL No. 93.778 Medical Assistance Program (Medicaid; Title XIX) Material Weakness and Noncompliance over Period of Performance Repeat Finding: No Condition: For 22 of 40 expenditure transactions selected for testing, the transactions were incurred outside of the period of the performance for the grant. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR ?200.303: The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR section 200.309, a non-Federal entity may charge to the Federal award only allowable costs incurred during the period of performance and any costs incurred before the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity made the Federal award that were authorized by the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity. Cause: There was a timing delay at the end of the fiscal year between the agency billing the grant and when the actual expenditure was recorded in the GL system to create the SEFA. Effect: Unallowed expenditures could be charged to the grant. Questioned Costs: $201,213. Recommendation: We recommend the City establish and implement internal controls that provide reasonable assurance that grant expenditures recorded in the general ledgers were recorded in the proper grant period. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor?s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Finding 2022-015 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services AL No. 93.568 Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program Significant Deficiency and Noncompliance over Period of Performance Repeat Finding: No Condition: For 6 out of 40 selections, the transactions were incurred outside of the fiscal year 2022. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR ?200.303: The Non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR section 200.309, a non-Federal entity may charge to the Federal award only allowable costs incurred during the period of performance and any costs incurred before the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity made the Federal award that were authorized by the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity. Additionally, at least 90 percent of the LIHEAP block grant funds payable to the grantee must be obligated in the federal fiscal year in which they are awarded. Up to 10 percent of the funds payable may be held available (or ?carried over?) for obligation no later than the end of the following federal fiscal year. Funds not obligated by the end of the following fiscal year must be returned to ACF. There are no limits on the time period for expenditure of funds (42 USC 8626). Cause: The agency did not have proper controls in place to ensure the period of performance requirements of the grant were met. Effect: The City was not in compliance with the period of performance requirements. Questioned Costs: $22,354. Recommendation: We recommend the City establish and implement controls to maintain compliance with reporting requirements. Finding 2022-015 (continued) Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor?s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Finding 2022-015 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services AL No. 93.568 Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program Significant Deficiency and Noncompliance over Period of Performance Repeat Finding: No Condition: For 6 out of 40 selections, the transactions were incurred outside of the fiscal year 2022. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR ?200.303: The Non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR section 200.309, a non-Federal entity may charge to the Federal award only allowable costs incurred during the period of performance and any costs incurred before the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity made the Federal award that were authorized by the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity. Additionally, at least 90 percent of the LIHEAP block grant funds payable to the grantee must be obligated in the federal fiscal year in which they are awarded. Up to 10 percent of the funds payable may be held available (or ?carried over?) for obligation no later than the end of the following federal fiscal year. Funds not obligated by the end of the following fiscal year must be returned to ACF. There are no limits on the time period for expenditure of funds (42 USC 8626). Cause: The agency did not have proper controls in place to ensure the period of performance requirements of the grant were met. Effect: The City was not in compliance with the period of performance requirements. Questioned Costs: $22,354. Recommendation: We recommend the City establish and implement controls to maintain compliance with reporting requirements. Finding 2022-015 (continued) Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor?s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
2022-002 U.S. Department of Education Passed-through the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Special Education Cluster ? CFDA 84.027 & 84.173 Criteria: Per 2 CFR section 200.309 of the Uniform Guidance, a non-federal entity may charge to a Federal award only allowable costs incurred during the period of performance and any costs incurred before the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity made the Federal award that were authorized by the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity. Condition: Invoices and payroll were charged for services performed prior to the approval dates by the pass-through agency. Cause: Invoices were not provided in a timely manner by vendors nor were services dates properly identified by the Town. Numerous payroll entries were recorded to correct prior year findings and close out grants with some payroll being outside the period. Effect: The Town expended funds outside of the period of performance which resulted in questioned costs. Questioned Costs: $25,880.10 Recommendation: The Town should implement procedures to properly monitor award approval dates to ensure that goods and services charged to federal grants occur during the period of performance. Views of Responsible Official: Management agrees with the finding.
2022-002 U.S. Department of Education Passed-through the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Special Education Cluster ? CFDA 84.027 & 84.173 Criteria: Per 2 CFR section 200.309 of the Uniform Guidance, a non-federal entity may charge to a Federal award only allowable costs incurred during the period of performance and any costs incurred before the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity made the Federal award that were authorized by the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity. Condition: Invoices and payroll were charged for services performed prior to the approval dates by the pass-through agency. Cause: Invoices were not provided in a timely manner by vendors nor were services dates properly identified by the Town. Numerous payroll entries were recorded to correct prior year findings and close out grants with some payroll being outside the period. Effect: The Town expended funds outside of the period of performance which resulted in questioned costs. Questioned Costs: $25,880.10 Recommendation: The Town should implement procedures to properly monitor award approval dates to ensure that goods and services charged to federal grants occur during the period of performance. Views of Responsible Official: Management agrees with the finding.
2022-002 U.S. Department of Education Passed-through the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Special Education Cluster ? CFDA 84.027 & 84.173 Criteria: Per 2 CFR section 200.309 of the Uniform Guidance, a non-federal entity may charge to a Federal award only allowable costs incurred during the period of performance and any costs incurred before the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity made the Federal award that were authorized by the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity. Condition: Invoices and payroll were charged for services performed prior to the approval dates by the pass-through agency. Cause: Invoices were not provided in a timely manner by vendors nor were services dates properly identified by the Town. Numerous payroll entries were recorded to correct prior year findings and close out grants with some payroll being outside the period. Effect: The Town expended funds outside of the period of performance which resulted in questioned costs. Questioned Costs: $25,880.10 Recommendation: The Town should implement procedures to properly monitor award approval dates to ensure that goods and services charged to federal grants occur during the period of performance. Views of Responsible Official: Management agrees with the finding.
2022-002 U.S. Department of Education Passed-through the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Special Education Cluster ? CFDA 84.027 & 84.173 Criteria: Per 2 CFR section 200.309 of the Uniform Guidance, a non-federal entity may charge to a Federal award only allowable costs incurred during the period of performance and any costs incurred before the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity made the Federal award that were authorized by the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity. Condition: Invoices and payroll were charged for services performed prior to the approval dates by the pass-through agency. Cause: Invoices were not provided in a timely manner by vendors nor were services dates properly identified by the Town. Numerous payroll entries were recorded to correct prior year findings and close out grants with some payroll being outside the period. Effect: The Town expended funds outside of the period of performance which resulted in questioned costs. Questioned Costs: $25,880.10 Recommendation: The Town should implement procedures to properly monitor award approval dates to ensure that goods and services charged to federal grants occur during the period of performance. Views of Responsible Official: Management agrees with the finding.
2022-002 U.S. Department of Education Passed-through the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Special Education Cluster ? CFDA 84.027 & 84.173 Criteria: Per 2 CFR section 200.309 of the Uniform Guidance, a non-federal entity may charge to a Federal award only allowable costs incurred during the period of performance and any costs incurred before the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity made the Federal award that were authorized by the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity. Condition: Invoices and payroll were charged for services performed prior to the approval dates by the pass-through agency. Cause: Invoices were not provided in a timely manner by vendors nor were services dates properly identified by the Town. Numerous payroll entries were recorded to correct prior year findings and close out grants with some payroll being outside the period. Effect: The Town expended funds outside of the period of performance which resulted in questioned costs. Questioned Costs: $25,880.10 Recommendation: The Town should implement procedures to properly monitor award approval dates to ensure that goods and services charged to federal grants occur during the period of performance. Views of Responsible Official: Management agrees with the finding.
2022-002 U.S. Department of Education Passed-through the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Special Education Cluster ? CFDA 84.027 & 84.173 Criteria: Per 2 CFR section 200.309 of the Uniform Guidance, a non-federal entity may charge to a Federal award only allowable costs incurred during the period of performance and any costs incurred before the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity made the Federal award that were authorized by the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity. Condition: Invoices and payroll were charged for services performed prior to the approval dates by the pass-through agency. Cause: Invoices were not provided in a timely manner by vendors nor were services dates properly identified by the Town. Numerous payroll entries were recorded to correct prior year findings and close out grants with some payroll being outside the period. Effect: The Town expended funds outside of the period of performance which resulted in questioned costs. Questioned Costs: $25,880.10 Recommendation: The Town should implement procedures to properly monitor award approval dates to ensure that goods and services charged to federal grants occur during the period of performance. Views of Responsible Official: Management agrees with the finding.
2022-002 U.S. Department of Education Passed-through the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Special Education Cluster ? CFDA 84.027 & 84.173 Criteria: Per 2 CFR section 200.309 of the Uniform Guidance, a non-federal entity may charge to a Federal award only allowable costs incurred during the period of performance and any costs incurred before the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity made the Federal award that were authorized by the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity. Condition: Invoices and payroll were charged for services performed prior to the approval dates by the pass-through agency. Cause: Invoices were not provided in a timely manner by vendors nor were services dates properly identified by the Town. Numerous payroll entries were recorded to correct prior year findings and close out grants with some payroll being outside the period. Effect: The Town expended funds outside of the period of performance which resulted in questioned costs. Questioned Costs: $25,880.10 Recommendation: The Town should implement procedures to properly monitor award approval dates to ensure that goods and services charged to federal grants occur during the period of performance. Views of Responsible Official: Management agrees with the finding.
2022-002 U.S. Department of Education Passed-through the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Special Education Cluster ? CFDA 84.027 & 84.173 Criteria: Per 2 CFR section 200.309 of the Uniform Guidance, a non-federal entity may charge to a Federal award only allowable costs incurred during the period of performance and any costs incurred before the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity made the Federal award that were authorized by the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity. Condition: Invoices and payroll were charged for services performed prior to the approval dates by the pass-through agency. Cause: Invoices were not provided in a timely manner by vendors nor were services dates properly identified by the Town. Numerous payroll entries were recorded to correct prior year findings and close out grants with some payroll being outside the period. Effect: The Town expended funds outside of the period of performance which resulted in questioned costs. Questioned Costs: $25,880.10 Recommendation: The Town should implement procedures to properly monitor award approval dates to ensure that goods and services charged to federal grants occur during the period of performance. Views of Responsible Official: Management agrees with the finding.
2022-002 U.S. Department of Education Passed-through the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Special Education Cluster ? CFDA 84.027 & 84.173 Criteria: Per 2 CFR section 200.309 of the Uniform Guidance, a non-federal entity may charge to a Federal award only allowable costs incurred during the period of performance and any costs incurred before the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity made the Federal award that were authorized by the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity. Condition: Invoices and payroll were charged for services performed prior to the approval dates by the pass-through agency. Cause: Invoices were not provided in a timely manner by vendors nor were services dates properly identified by the Town. Numerous payroll entries were recorded to correct prior year findings and close out grants with some payroll being outside the period. Effect: The Town expended funds outside of the period of performance which resulted in questioned costs. Questioned Costs: $25,880.10 Recommendation: The Town should implement procedures to properly monitor award approval dates to ensure that goods and services charged to federal grants occur during the period of performance. Views of Responsible Official: Management agrees with the finding.
FINDING 2022-005 Subject: Special Education Cluster ? Period of Performance Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education_Grants to States, Special Education_Preschool Grants AL Numbers: 84.027, 84.173 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY21, FY22 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Period of Performance Audit Findings: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: ?The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in `Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the `Internal Control Integrated Framework?, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . .? 2 CFR 200.309 states: ?A non-Federal entity may charge to the Federal award only allowable costs incurred during the period of performance (except as described in ? 200.461 Publication and printing costs) and any costs incurred before the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity made the Federal award that were authorized by the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity.? 2 CFR 200.343(b) states: ?Unless the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity authorizes an extension, a non-Federal entity must liquidate all obligations incurred under the Federal award not later than 90 calendar days after the end date of the period of performance as specified in the terms and conditions of the Federal award.? Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the equipment requirements of the Period of Performance compliance requirement. Cause: The School Corporation's management had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured that adequate records and documentation would be available to support compliance with the grant agreement and the period of performance requirements. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system and failure to maintain and provide records and documentation of expenditures by grant award, program, and years prevented the determination of the School Corporation's compliance with the Period of Performance compliance requirement. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: The School Corporation was a member of a joint service cooperative (Cooperative). The Cooperative operated the special education programs on behalf of the School Corporation and managed the special education grant funds. Because the grant agreements were between the Indiana Department of Education and the School Corporation, the School Corporation was ultimately responsible for compliance with the grant agreement and the Period of Performance compliance requirement. During fiscal year 2021, the School Corporation paid membership fees to the Cooperative out of federal Special Education funds. These membership fees made up approximately 48% of the total federal expenditures reimbursed during fiscal year 2021. The Cooperative accounted for state, local, and federal funds in a single fund. The fund did not separately account for each of the funding sources. This made it difficult to identify which expenditures were from federal funds, or to identify expenditures by federal program, award number, or years. Therefore, we could not test compliance with the period of performance requirements for approximately 48% of the expenditures. The School Corporation did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that the Cooperative complied with the period of performance requirements. The Cooperative did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that costs were charged to the programs only during the period of performance, or that all obligations were liquidated within 90 days of the end of the period of performance. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues, which occurred specifically during fiscal year 2021. No reportable findings were noted for fiscal year 2022. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: Yes, see Finding 2020-004. Recommendation: It was recommended that the School Corporation?s management establish internal controls to ensure that records and documentation will be maintained and made available for audit related to the Period of Performance compliance requirements. As recommended, management implemented internal control procedures for the year ended June 30, 2022. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding and has implemented their corrective action plan.
FINDING 2022-005 Subject: Special Education Cluster ? Period of Performance Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education_Grants to States, Special Education_Preschool Grants AL Numbers: 84.027, 84.173 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY21, FY22 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Period of Performance Audit Findings: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: ?The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in `Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the `Internal Control Integrated Framework?, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . .? 2 CFR 200.309 states: ?A non-Federal entity may charge to the Federal award only allowable costs incurred during the period of performance (except as described in ? 200.461 Publication and printing costs) and any costs incurred before the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity made the Federal award that were authorized by the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity.? 2 CFR 200.343(b) states: ?Unless the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity authorizes an extension, a non-Federal entity must liquidate all obligations incurred under the Federal award not later than 90 calendar days after the end date of the period of performance as specified in the terms and conditions of the Federal award.? Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the equipment requirements of the Period of Performance compliance requirement. Cause: The School Corporation's management had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured that adequate records and documentation would be available to support compliance with the grant agreement and the period of performance requirements. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system and failure to maintain and provide records and documentation of expenditures by grant award, program, and years prevented the determination of the School Corporation's compliance with the Period of Performance compliance requirement. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: The School Corporation was a member of a joint service cooperative (Cooperative). The Cooperative operated the special education programs on behalf of the School Corporation and managed the special education grant funds. Because the grant agreements were between the Indiana Department of Education and the School Corporation, the School Corporation was ultimately responsible for compliance with the grant agreement and the Period of Performance compliance requirement. During fiscal year 2021, the School Corporation paid membership fees to the Cooperative out of federal Special Education funds. These membership fees made up approximately 48% of the total federal expenditures reimbursed during fiscal year 2021. The Cooperative accounted for state, local, and federal funds in a single fund. The fund did not separately account for each of the funding sources. This made it difficult to identify which expenditures were from federal funds, or to identify expenditures by federal program, award number, or years. Therefore, we could not test compliance with the period of performance requirements for approximately 48% of the expenditures. The School Corporation did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that the Cooperative complied with the period of performance requirements. The Cooperative did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that costs were charged to the programs only during the period of performance, or that all obligations were liquidated within 90 days of the end of the period of performance. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues, which occurred specifically during fiscal year 2021. No reportable findings were noted for fiscal year 2022. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: Yes, see Finding 2020-004. Recommendation: It was recommended that the School Corporation?s management establish internal controls to ensure that records and documentation will be maintained and made available for audit related to the Period of Performance compliance requirements. As recommended, management implemented internal control procedures for the year ended June 30, 2022. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding and has implemented their corrective action plan.
FINDING 2022-005 Subject: Special Education Cluster ? Period of Performance Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education_Grants to States, Special Education_Preschool Grants AL Numbers: 84.027, 84.173 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY21, FY22 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Period of Performance Audit Findings: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: ?The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in `Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the `Internal Control Integrated Framework?, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . .? 2 CFR 200.309 states: ?A non-Federal entity may charge to the Federal award only allowable costs incurred during the period of performance (except as described in ? 200.461 Publication and printing costs) and any costs incurred before the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity made the Federal award that were authorized by the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity.? 2 CFR 200.343(b) states: ?Unless the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity authorizes an extension, a non-Federal entity must liquidate all obligations incurred under the Federal award not later than 90 calendar days after the end date of the period of performance as specified in the terms and conditions of the Federal award.? Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the equipment requirements of the Period of Performance compliance requirement. Cause: The School Corporation's management had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured that adequate records and documentation would be available to support compliance with the grant agreement and the period of performance requirements. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system and failure to maintain and provide records and documentation of expenditures by grant award, program, and years prevented the determination of the School Corporation's compliance with the Period of Performance compliance requirement. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: The School Corporation was a member of a joint service cooperative (Cooperative). The Cooperative operated the special education programs on behalf of the School Corporation and managed the special education grant funds. Because the grant agreements were between the Indiana Department of Education and the School Corporation, the School Corporation was ultimately responsible for compliance with the grant agreement and the Period of Performance compliance requirement. During fiscal year 2021, the School Corporation paid membership fees to the Cooperative out of federal Special Education funds. These membership fees made up approximately 48% of the total federal expenditures reimbursed during fiscal year 2021. The Cooperative accounted for state, local, and federal funds in a single fund. The fund did not separately account for each of the funding sources. This made it difficult to identify which expenditures were from federal funds, or to identify expenditures by federal program, award number, or years. Therefore, we could not test compliance with the period of performance requirements for approximately 48% of the expenditures. The School Corporation did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that the Cooperative complied with the period of performance requirements. The Cooperative did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that costs were charged to the programs only during the period of performance, or that all obligations were liquidated within 90 days of the end of the period of performance. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues, which occurred specifically during fiscal year 2021. No reportable findings were noted for fiscal year 2022. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: Yes, see Finding 2020-004. Recommendation: It was recommended that the School Corporation?s management establish internal controls to ensure that records and documentation will be maintained and made available for audit related to the Period of Performance compliance requirements. As recommended, management implemented internal control procedures for the year ended June 30, 2022. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding and has implemented their corrective action plan.
FINDING 2022-005 Subject: Special Education Cluster ? Period of Performance Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education_Grants to States, Special Education_Preschool Grants AL Numbers: 84.027, 84.173 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY21, FY22 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Period of Performance Audit Findings: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: ?The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in `Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the `Internal Control Integrated Framework?, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . .? 2 CFR 200.309 states: ?A non-Federal entity may charge to the Federal award only allowable costs incurred during the period of performance (except as described in ? 200.461 Publication and printing costs) and any costs incurred before the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity made the Federal award that were authorized by the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity.? 2 CFR 200.343(b) states: ?Unless the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity authorizes an extension, a non-Federal entity must liquidate all obligations incurred under the Federal award not later than 90 calendar days after the end date of the period of performance as specified in the terms and conditions of the Federal award.? Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the equipment requirements of the Period of Performance compliance requirement. Cause: The School Corporation's management had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured that adequate records and documentation would be available to support compliance with the grant agreement and the period of performance requirements. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system and failure to maintain and provide records and documentation of expenditures by grant award, program, and years prevented the determination of the School Corporation's compliance with the Period of Performance compliance requirement. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: The School Corporation was a member of a joint service cooperative (Cooperative). The Cooperative operated the special education programs on behalf of the School Corporation and managed the special education grant funds. Because the grant agreements were between the Indiana Department of Education and the School Corporation, the School Corporation was ultimately responsible for compliance with the grant agreement and the Period of Performance compliance requirement. During fiscal year 2021, the School Corporation paid membership fees to the Cooperative out of federal Special Education funds. These membership fees made up approximately 48% of the total federal expenditures reimbursed during fiscal year 2021. The Cooperative accounted for state, local, and federal funds in a single fund. The fund did not separately account for each of the funding sources. This made it difficult to identify which expenditures were from federal funds, or to identify expenditures by federal program, award number, or years. Therefore, we could not test compliance with the period of performance requirements for approximately 48% of the expenditures. The School Corporation did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that the Cooperative complied with the period of performance requirements. The Cooperative did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that costs were charged to the programs only during the period of performance, or that all obligations were liquidated within 90 days of the end of the period of performance. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues, which occurred specifically during fiscal year 2021. No reportable findings were noted for fiscal year 2022. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: Yes, see Finding 2020-004. Recommendation: It was recommended that the School Corporation?s management establish internal controls to ensure that records and documentation will be maintained and made available for audit related to the Period of Performance compliance requirements. As recommended, management implemented internal control procedures for the year ended June 30, 2022. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding and has implemented their corrective action plan.
FINDING 2022-005 Subject: Special Education Cluster ? Period of Performance Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education_Grants to States, Special Education_Preschool Grants AL Numbers: 84.027, 84.173 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY21, FY22 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Period of Performance Audit Findings: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: ?The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in `Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the `Internal Control Integrated Framework?, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . .? 2 CFR 200.309 states: ?A non-Federal entity may charge to the Federal award only allowable costs incurred during the period of performance (except as described in ? 200.461 Publication and printing costs) and any costs incurred before the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity made the Federal award that were authorized by the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity.? 2 CFR 200.343(b) states: ?Unless the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity authorizes an extension, a non-Federal entity must liquidate all obligations incurred under the Federal award not later than 90 calendar days after the end date of the period of performance as specified in the terms and conditions of the Federal award.? Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the equipment requirements of the Period of Performance compliance requirement. Cause: The School Corporation's management had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured that adequate records and documentation would be available to support compliance with the grant agreement and the period of performance requirements. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system and failure to maintain and provide records and documentation of expenditures by grant award, program, and years prevented the determination of the School Corporation's compliance with the Period of Performance compliance requirement. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: The School Corporation was a member of a joint service cooperative (Cooperative). The Cooperative operated the special education programs on behalf of the School Corporation and managed the special education grant funds. Because the grant agreements were between the Indiana Department of Education and the School Corporation, the School Corporation was ultimately responsible for compliance with the grant agreement and the Period of Performance compliance requirement. During fiscal year 2021, the School Corporation paid membership fees to the Cooperative out of federal Special Education funds. These membership fees made up approximately 48% of the total federal expenditures reimbursed during fiscal year 2021. The Cooperative accounted for state, local, and federal funds in a single fund. The fund did not separately account for each of the funding sources. This made it difficult to identify which expenditures were from federal funds, or to identify expenditures by federal program, award number, or years. Therefore, we could not test compliance with the period of performance requirements for approximately 48% of the expenditures. The School Corporation did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that the Cooperative complied with the period of performance requirements. The Cooperative did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that costs were charged to the programs only during the period of performance, or that all obligations were liquidated within 90 days of the end of the period of performance. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues, which occurred specifically during fiscal year 2021. No reportable findings were noted for fiscal year 2022. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: Yes, see Finding 2020-004. Recommendation: It was recommended that the School Corporation?s management establish internal controls to ensure that records and documentation will be maintained and made available for audit related to the Period of Performance compliance requirements. As recommended, management implemented internal control procedures for the year ended June 30, 2022. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding and has implemented their corrective action plan.
FINDING 2022-005 Subject: Special Education Cluster ? Period of Performance Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education_Grants to States, Special Education_Preschool Grants AL Numbers: 84.027, 84.173 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY21, FY22 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Period of Performance Audit Findings: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: ?The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in `Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the `Internal Control Integrated Framework?, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . .? 2 CFR 200.309 states: ?A non-Federal entity may charge to the Federal award only allowable costs incurred during the period of performance (except as described in ? 200.461 Publication and printing costs) and any costs incurred before the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity made the Federal award that were authorized by the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity.? 2 CFR 200.343(b) states: ?Unless the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity authorizes an extension, a non-Federal entity must liquidate all obligations incurred under the Federal award not later than 90 calendar days after the end date of the period of performance as specified in the terms and conditions of the Federal award.? Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the equipment requirements of the Period of Performance compliance requirement. Cause: The School Corporation's management had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured that adequate records and documentation would be available to support compliance with the grant agreement and the period of performance requirements. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system and failure to maintain and provide records and documentation of expenditures by grant award, program, and years prevented the determination of the School Corporation's compliance with the Period of Performance compliance requirement. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: The School Corporation was a member of a joint service cooperative (Cooperative). The Cooperative operated the special education programs on behalf of the School Corporation and managed the special education grant funds. Because the grant agreements were between the Indiana Department of Education and the School Corporation, the School Corporation was ultimately responsible for compliance with the grant agreement and the Period of Performance compliance requirement. During fiscal year 2021, the School Corporation paid membership fees to the Cooperative out of federal Special Education funds. These membership fees made up approximately 48% of the total federal expenditures reimbursed during fiscal year 2021. The Cooperative accounted for state, local, and federal funds in a single fund. The fund did not separately account for each of the funding sources. This made it difficult to identify which expenditures were from federal funds, or to identify expenditures by federal program, award number, or years. Therefore, we could not test compliance with the period of performance requirements for approximately 48% of the expenditures. The School Corporation did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that the Cooperative complied with the period of performance requirements. The Cooperative did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that costs were charged to the programs only during the period of performance, or that all obligations were liquidated within 90 days of the end of the period of performance. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues, which occurred specifically during fiscal year 2021. No reportable findings were noted for fiscal year 2022. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: Yes, see Finding 2020-004. Recommendation: It was recommended that the School Corporation?s management establish internal controls to ensure that records and documentation will be maintained and made available for audit related to the Period of Performance compliance requirements. As recommended, management implemented internal control procedures for the year ended June 30, 2022. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding and has implemented their corrective action plan.
FINDING 2022-005 Subject: Special Education Cluster ? Period of Performance Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education_Grants to States, Special Education_Preschool Grants AL Numbers: 84.027, 84.173 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY21, FY22 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Period of Performance Audit Findings: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: ?The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in `Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the `Internal Control Integrated Framework?, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . .? 2 CFR 200.309 states: ?A non-Federal entity may charge to the Federal award only allowable costs incurred during the period of performance (except as described in ? 200.461 Publication and printing costs) and any costs incurred before the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity made the Federal award that were authorized by the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity.? 2 CFR 200.343(b) states: ?Unless the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity authorizes an extension, a non-Federal entity must liquidate all obligations incurred under the Federal award not later than 90 calendar days after the end date of the period of performance as specified in the terms and conditions of the Federal award.? Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the equipment requirements of the Period of Performance compliance requirement. Cause: The School Corporation's management had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured that adequate records and documentation would be available to support compliance with the grant agreement and the period of performance requirements. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system and failure to maintain and provide records and documentation of expenditures by grant award, program, and years prevented the determination of the School Corporation's compliance with the Period of Performance compliance requirement. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: The School Corporation was a member of a joint service cooperative (Cooperative). The Cooperative operated the special education programs on behalf of the School Corporation and managed the special education grant funds. Because the grant agreements were between the Indiana Department of Education and the School Corporation, the School Corporation was ultimately responsible for compliance with the grant agreement and the Period of Performance compliance requirement. During fiscal year 2021, the School Corporation paid membership fees to the Cooperative out of federal Special Education funds. These membership fees made up approximately 48% of the total federal expenditures reimbursed during fiscal year 2021. The Cooperative accounted for state, local, and federal funds in a single fund. The fund did not separately account for each of the funding sources. This made it difficult to identify which expenditures were from federal funds, or to identify expenditures by federal program, award number, or years. Therefore, we could not test compliance with the period of performance requirements for approximately 48% of the expenditures. The School Corporation did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that the Cooperative complied with the period of performance requirements. The Cooperative did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that costs were charged to the programs only during the period of performance, or that all obligations were liquidated within 90 days of the end of the period of performance. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues, which occurred specifically during fiscal year 2021. No reportable findings were noted for fiscal year 2022. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: Yes, see Finding 2020-004. Recommendation: It was recommended that the School Corporation?s management establish internal controls to ensure that records and documentation will be maintained and made available for audit related to the Period of Performance compliance requirements. As recommended, management implemented internal control procedures for the year ended June 30, 2022. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding and has implemented their corrective action plan.
Finding number: 2022 005 Federal agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Pass through agency: Massachusetts Executive Office of Elderly Affairs Program: Aging Cluster ALN #: 93.044, 93.045, 93.053 Award number: Various Award year: Various Finding: Internal Control over Subrecipient Monitoring Prior Year Finding: No Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency Criteria 2 CFR section 200.331(a) indicates that all pass through entities must ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the following information at the time of the subaward and if any of these data elements change, include the changes in subsequent subaward modification: (1) Federal Award Identification. ? Subrecipient?s name (which must match registered name in DUNS); ? Subrecipient?s DUNS number (see ? 200.32 Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) number); ? Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN); ? Federal award date; ? Subaward Period of Performance Start and End Date; ? Amount of Federal Funds Obligated by this action; ? Total Amount of Federal Funds Obligated to the subrecipient; ? Total Amount of the Federal Award committed to the subrecipient by the pass through entity; ? Federal award project description, as required to be responsive to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA); ? Name of Federal awarding agency, pass through entity, and contact information for awarding official of the pass through entity; ? ALN Number and Name; the pass through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each Federal award and the ALN number at time of disbursement; ? Identification of whether the award is R&D; and ? Indirect cost rate for the Federal award (including if the de minimis rate is charged per ? 200.414 Indirect (F&A) costs). (2) All requirements imposed by the pass through entity on the subrecipient so that the Federal award is used in accordance with Federal statutes, regulations and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. (3) Any additional requirements that the pass through entity imposes on the subrecipient in order for the pass through entity to meet its own responsibility to the Federal awarding agency including identification of any required financial and performance reports; (4) An approved Federally recognized indirect cost rate negotiated between the subrecipient and the Federal government or, if no such rate exists, either a rate negotiated between the pass through entity and the subrecipient (in compliance with this part), or a de minimis indirect cost rate as defined in ? 200.414 Indirect (F&A) costs, paragraph (b) of this part. (5) A requirement that the subrecipient permit the pass through entity and auditors to have access to the subrecipient?s records and financial statements as necessary for the passthrough entity to meet the requirements of this section, ? 200.300 Statutory and national policy requirements through 200.309 Period of performance, and Subpart F ? Audit Requirements of this part; and (6) Appropriate terms and conditions concerning closeout of the subaward. Condition During our testing of subrecipient monitoring for a sample of 8 out of the population of 20 subrecipients, the City of Boston?s Age Strong Commission (Age Strong Commission) subaward letters were authorized however it was noted that such documents did not contain all of the required elements of 2 CFR Section 200.331(a) listed above. For all 8 subrecipients, the subaward letter did not identify whether the subaward is R&D and did not contain the indirect cost rate for the Federal award. Cause This appears to be due to inadequate review to ensure the subaward includes all of the required elements of 2CFR Section 200.331(a) prior to authorization. Effect Aging does not have adequate controls over subrecipient notification requirements. Whether Sampling was Statistically Valid The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation We recommend that OEM execute an updated MOA with its subrecipients that expressly includes all information description in 2 CFR section 200.331(a)(1) as required by the Uniform Guidance. View of Responsible Officials from the Auditee The City of Boston?s Age Strong Commission has revised the addendum that is attached to their award letters to include whether or not the award is R&D and a section on indirect cost rate.
Finding number: 2022 005 Federal agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Pass through agency: Massachusetts Executive Office of Elderly Affairs Program: Aging Cluster ALN #: 93.044, 93.045, 93.053 Award number: Various Award year: Various Finding: Internal Control over Subrecipient Monitoring Prior Year Finding: No Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency Criteria 2 CFR section 200.331(a) indicates that all pass through entities must ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the following information at the time of the subaward and if any of these data elements change, include the changes in subsequent subaward modification: (1) Federal Award Identification. ? Subrecipient?s name (which must match registered name in DUNS); ? Subrecipient?s DUNS number (see ? 200.32 Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) number); ? Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN); ? Federal award date; ? Subaward Period of Performance Start and End Date; ? Amount of Federal Funds Obligated by this action; ? Total Amount of Federal Funds Obligated to the subrecipient; ? Total Amount of the Federal Award committed to the subrecipient by the pass through entity; ? Federal award project description, as required to be responsive to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA); ? Name of Federal awarding agency, pass through entity, and contact information for awarding official of the pass through entity; ? ALN Number and Name; the pass through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each Federal award and the ALN number at time of disbursement; ? Identification of whether the award is R&D; and ? Indirect cost rate for the Federal award (including if the de minimis rate is charged per ? 200.414 Indirect (F&A) costs). (2) All requirements imposed by the pass through entity on the subrecipient so that the Federal award is used in accordance with Federal statutes, regulations and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. (3) Any additional requirements that the pass through entity imposes on the subrecipient in order for the pass through entity to meet its own responsibility to the Federal awarding agency including identification of any required financial and performance reports; (4) An approved Federally recognized indirect cost rate negotiated between the subrecipient and the Federal government or, if no such rate exists, either a rate negotiated between the pass through entity and the subrecipient (in compliance with this part), or a de minimis indirect cost rate as defined in ? 200.414 Indirect (F&A) costs, paragraph (b) of this part. (5) A requirement that the subrecipient permit the pass through entity and auditors to have access to the subrecipient?s records and financial statements as necessary for the passthrough entity to meet the requirements of this section, ? 200.300 Statutory and national policy requirements through 200.309 Period of performance, and Subpart F ? Audit Requirements of this part; and (6) Appropriate terms and conditions concerning closeout of the subaward. Condition During our testing of subrecipient monitoring for a sample of 8 out of the population of 20 subrecipients, the City of Boston?s Age Strong Commission (Age Strong Commission) subaward letters were authorized however it was noted that such documents did not contain all of the required elements of 2 CFR Section 200.331(a) listed above. For all 8 subrecipients, the subaward letter did not identify whether the subaward is R&D and did not contain the indirect cost rate for the Federal award. Cause This appears to be due to inadequate review to ensure the subaward includes all of the required elements of 2CFR Section 200.331(a) prior to authorization. Effect Aging does not have adequate controls over subrecipient notification requirements. Whether Sampling was Statistically Valid The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation We recommend that OEM execute an updated MOA with its subrecipients that expressly includes all information description in 2 CFR section 200.331(a)(1) as required by the Uniform Guidance. View of Responsible Officials from the Auditee The City of Boston?s Age Strong Commission has revised the addendum that is attached to their award letters to include whether or not the award is R&D and a section on indirect cost rate.
Finding number: 2022 005 Federal agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Pass through agency: Massachusetts Executive Office of Elderly Affairs Program: Aging Cluster ALN #: 93.044, 93.045, 93.053 Award number: Various Award year: Various Finding: Internal Control over Subrecipient Monitoring Prior Year Finding: No Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency Criteria 2 CFR section 200.331(a) indicates that all pass through entities must ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the following information at the time of the subaward and if any of these data elements change, include the changes in subsequent subaward modification: (1) Federal Award Identification. ? Subrecipient?s name (which must match registered name in DUNS); ? Subrecipient?s DUNS number (see ? 200.32 Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) number); ? Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN); ? Federal award date; ? Subaward Period of Performance Start and End Date; ? Amount of Federal Funds Obligated by this action; ? Total Amount of Federal Funds Obligated to the subrecipient; ? Total Amount of the Federal Award committed to the subrecipient by the pass through entity; ? Federal award project description, as required to be responsive to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA); ? Name of Federal awarding agency, pass through entity, and contact information for awarding official of the pass through entity; ? ALN Number and Name; the pass through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each Federal award and the ALN number at time of disbursement; ? Identification of whether the award is R&D; and ? Indirect cost rate for the Federal award (including if the de minimis rate is charged per ? 200.414 Indirect (F&A) costs). (2) All requirements imposed by the pass through entity on the subrecipient so that the Federal award is used in accordance with Federal statutes, regulations and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. (3) Any additional requirements that the pass through entity imposes on the subrecipient in order for the pass through entity to meet its own responsibility to the Federal awarding agency including identification of any required financial and performance reports; (4) An approved Federally recognized indirect cost rate negotiated between the subrecipient and the Federal government or, if no such rate exists, either a rate negotiated between the pass through entity and the subrecipient (in compliance with this part), or a de minimis indirect cost rate as defined in ? 200.414 Indirect (F&A) costs, paragraph (b) of this part. (5) A requirement that the subrecipient permit the pass through entity and auditors to have access to the subrecipient?s records and financial statements as necessary for the passthrough entity to meet the requirements of this section, ? 200.300 Statutory and national policy requirements through 200.309 Period of performance, and Subpart F ? Audit Requirements of this part; and (6) Appropriate terms and conditions concerning closeout of the subaward. Condition During our testing of subrecipient monitoring for a sample of 8 out of the population of 20 subrecipients, the City of Boston?s Age Strong Commission (Age Strong Commission) subaward letters were authorized however it was noted that such documents did not contain all of the required elements of 2 CFR Section 200.331(a) listed above. For all 8 subrecipients, the subaward letter did not identify whether the subaward is R&D and did not contain the indirect cost rate for the Federal award. Cause This appears to be due to inadequate review to ensure the subaward includes all of the required elements of 2CFR Section 200.331(a) prior to authorization. Effect Aging does not have adequate controls over subrecipient notification requirements. Whether Sampling was Statistically Valid The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation We recommend that OEM execute an updated MOA with its subrecipients that expressly includes all information description in 2 CFR section 200.331(a)(1) as required by the Uniform Guidance. View of Responsible Officials from the Auditee The City of Boston?s Age Strong Commission has revised the addendum that is attached to their award letters to include whether or not the award is R&D and a section on indirect cost rate.
Finding number: 2022 005 Federal agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Pass through agency: Massachusetts Executive Office of Elderly Affairs Program: Aging Cluster ALN #: 93.044, 93.045, 93.053 Award number: Various Award year: Various Finding: Internal Control over Subrecipient Monitoring Prior Year Finding: No Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency Criteria 2 CFR section 200.331(a) indicates that all pass through entities must ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the following information at the time of the subaward and if any of these data elements change, include the changes in subsequent subaward modification: (1) Federal Award Identification. ? Subrecipient?s name (which must match registered name in DUNS); ? Subrecipient?s DUNS number (see ? 200.32 Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) number); ? Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN); ? Federal award date; ? Subaward Period of Performance Start and End Date; ? Amount of Federal Funds Obligated by this action; ? Total Amount of Federal Funds Obligated to the subrecipient; ? Total Amount of the Federal Award committed to the subrecipient by the pass through entity; ? Federal award project description, as required to be responsive to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA); ? Name of Federal awarding agency, pass through entity, and contact information for awarding official of the pass through entity; ? ALN Number and Name; the pass through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each Federal award and the ALN number at time of disbursement; ? Identification of whether the award is R&D; and ? Indirect cost rate for the Federal award (including if the de minimis rate is charged per ? 200.414 Indirect (F&A) costs). (2) All requirements imposed by the pass through entity on the subrecipient so that the Federal award is used in accordance with Federal statutes, regulations and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. (3) Any additional requirements that the pass through entity imposes on the subrecipient in order for the pass through entity to meet its own responsibility to the Federal awarding agency including identification of any required financial and performance reports; (4) An approved Federally recognized indirect cost rate negotiated between the subrecipient and the Federal government or, if no such rate exists, either a rate negotiated between the pass through entity and the subrecipient (in compliance with this part), or a de minimis indirect cost rate as defined in ? 200.414 Indirect (F&A) costs, paragraph (b) of this part. (5) A requirement that the subrecipient permit the pass through entity and auditors to have access to the subrecipient?s records and financial statements as necessary for the passthrough entity to meet the requirements of this section, ? 200.300 Statutory and national policy requirements through 200.309 Period of performance, and Subpart F ? Audit Requirements of this part; and (6) Appropriate terms and conditions concerning closeout of the subaward. Condition During our testing of subrecipient monitoring for a sample of 8 out of the population of 20 subrecipients, the City of Boston?s Age Strong Commission (Age Strong Commission) subaward letters were authorized however it was noted that such documents did not contain all of the required elements of 2 CFR Section 200.331(a) listed above. For all 8 subrecipients, the subaward letter did not identify whether the subaward is R&D and did not contain the indirect cost rate for the Federal award. Cause This appears to be due to inadequate review to ensure the subaward includes all of the required elements of 2CFR Section 200.331(a) prior to authorization. Effect Aging does not have adequate controls over subrecipient notification requirements. Whether Sampling was Statistically Valid The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation We recommend that OEM execute an updated MOA with its subrecipients that expressly includes all information description in 2 CFR section 200.331(a)(1) as required by the Uniform Guidance. View of Responsible Officials from the Auditee The City of Boston?s Age Strong Commission has revised the addendum that is attached to their award letters to include whether or not the award is R&D and a section on indirect cost rate.
Finding number: 2022 005 Federal agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Pass through agency: Massachusetts Executive Office of Elderly Affairs Program: Aging Cluster ALN #: 93.044, 93.045, 93.053 Award number: Various Award year: Various Finding: Internal Control over Subrecipient Monitoring Prior Year Finding: No Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency Criteria 2 CFR section 200.331(a) indicates that all pass through entities must ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the following information at the time of the subaward and if any of these data elements change, include the changes in subsequent subaward modification: (1) Federal Award Identification. ? Subrecipient?s name (which must match registered name in DUNS); ? Subrecipient?s DUNS number (see ? 200.32 Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) number); ? Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN); ? Federal award date; ? Subaward Period of Performance Start and End Date; ? Amount of Federal Funds Obligated by this action; ? Total Amount of Federal Funds Obligated to the subrecipient; ? Total Amount of the Federal Award committed to the subrecipient by the pass through entity; ? Federal award project description, as required to be responsive to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA); ? Name of Federal awarding agency, pass through entity, and contact information for awarding official of the pass through entity; ? ALN Number and Name; the pass through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each Federal award and the ALN number at time of disbursement; ? Identification of whether the award is R&D; and ? Indirect cost rate for the Federal award (including if the de minimis rate is charged per ? 200.414 Indirect (F&A) costs). (2) All requirements imposed by the pass through entity on the subrecipient so that the Federal award is used in accordance with Federal statutes, regulations and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. (3) Any additional requirements that the pass through entity imposes on the subrecipient in order for the pass through entity to meet its own responsibility to the Federal awarding agency including identification of any required financial and performance reports; (4) An approved Federally recognized indirect cost rate negotiated between the subrecipient and the Federal government or, if no such rate exists, either a rate negotiated between the pass through entity and the subrecipient (in compliance with this part), or a de minimis indirect cost rate as defined in ? 200.414 Indirect (F&A) costs, paragraph (b) of this part. (5) A requirement that the subrecipient permit the pass through entity and auditors to have access to the subrecipient?s records and financial statements as necessary for the passthrough entity to meet the requirements of this section, ? 200.300 Statutory and national policy requirements through 200.309 Period of performance, and Subpart F ? Audit Requirements of this part; and (6) Appropriate terms and conditions concerning closeout of the subaward. Condition During our testing of subrecipient monitoring for a sample of 8 out of the population of 20 subrecipients, the City of Boston?s Age Strong Commission (Age Strong Commission) subaward letters were authorized however it was noted that such documents did not contain all of the required elements of 2 CFR Section 200.331(a) listed above. For all 8 subrecipients, the subaward letter did not identify whether the subaward is R&D and did not contain the indirect cost rate for the Federal award. Cause This appears to be due to inadequate review to ensure the subaward includes all of the required elements of 2CFR Section 200.331(a) prior to authorization. Effect Aging does not have adequate controls over subrecipient notification requirements. Whether Sampling was Statistically Valid The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation We recommend that OEM execute an updated MOA with its subrecipients that expressly includes all information description in 2 CFR section 200.331(a)(1) as required by the Uniform Guidance. View of Responsible Officials from the Auditee The City of Boston?s Age Strong Commission has revised the addendum that is attached to their award letters to include whether or not the award is R&D and a section on indirect cost rate.
Reference Number: 2022-017 Prior Year Finding: No Federal Agency: Department of Labor State Agency: Vermont Department of Labor (Department) Federal Program: Unemployment Insurance, COVID-19 ? Unemployment Insurance Assistance Listing Number: 17.225 Award Number and Year: UI372542255A50 (10/1/2021 ? 12/31/2024) Compliance Requirement: Period of Performance Type of Finding Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance, Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Compliance: A non-federal entity may charge only allowable costs incurred during the approved budget period of a federal award?s period of performance and any costs incurred before the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity made the federal award that were authorized by the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity (2 CFR sections 200.308 200.309 and 200.403(h)). A period of performance may contain one or more budget periods. Control: Per 2 CFR section 200.303(a), a non-Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should comply with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework?, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition: Costs were incurred and charged to the federal grant prior to the allowable start of the period of performance. Questioned costs: Below the reportable limit. Context: One of forty transactions was charged to the award before the allowable period of performance. The grant award start date was 10/1/2021 but a transaction dated 8/31/2021 in the amount of $7,421 was charged to the award. Cause: The Department of Labor?s (Department?s) procedures were not sufficient to ensure that expenditures charged to the program were incurred within the award?s period of performance. Internal controls did not prevent or detect the error. Effect: Costs could be deemed unallowable by the awarding agency if funds are expended outside of the allowable period of performance. Recommendation: The Department should review and enhance its procedures and internal controls to ensure that it charges expenditures to the program that are incurred within an award?s allowable period of performance. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding.
Reference Number: 2022-017 Prior Year Finding: No Federal Agency: Department of Labor State Agency: Vermont Department of Labor (Department) Federal Program: Unemployment Insurance, COVID-19 ? Unemployment Insurance Assistance Listing Number: 17.225 Award Number and Year: UI372542255A50 (10/1/2021 ? 12/31/2024) Compliance Requirement: Period of Performance Type of Finding Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance, Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Compliance: A non-federal entity may charge only allowable costs incurred during the approved budget period of a federal award?s period of performance and any costs incurred before the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity made the federal award that were authorized by the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity (2 CFR sections 200.308 200.309 and 200.403(h)). A period of performance may contain one or more budget periods. Control: Per 2 CFR section 200.303(a), a non-Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should comply with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework?, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition: Costs were incurred and charged to the federal grant prior to the allowable start of the period of performance. Questioned costs: Below the reportable limit. Context: One of forty transactions was charged to the award before the allowable period of performance. The grant award start date was 10/1/2021 but a transaction dated 8/31/2021 in the amount of $7,421 was charged to the award. Cause: The Department of Labor?s (Department?s) procedures were not sufficient to ensure that expenditures charged to the program were incurred within the award?s period of performance. Internal controls did not prevent or detect the error. Effect: Costs could be deemed unallowable by the awarding agency if funds are expended outside of the allowable period of performance. Recommendation: The Department should review and enhance its procedures and internal controls to ensure that it charges expenditures to the program that are incurred within an award?s allowable period of performance. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding.
REFERENCE: 2022-101 CFDA NUMBER 84.425D ? COVID 19 ? EDUCATION STABILIZATION FUND CFDA NUMBER 84.425U ? COVID 19 ? EDUCATION STABILIZATION FUND U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION ? 2021 PASSED THROUGH ARIZONA STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION GRANT NUMBER: S425D210038 & S425U210038 QUESTIONED COSTS N/A CONDITION The following errors were noted during testing of allowable costs, activities and procurement: ? For 1 of 3 vendors tested for procurement, only 1 quote was available for review. ? Vendors were not evaluated for suspension or debarment prior to purchases being made. ? For 3 of 12 disbursements tested, although the purchases are allowable under the grants, the purchases were not included in the grant budgets submitted to the Arizona Department of Education. Amended budgets were submitted on August 31, 2022. CRITERIA In accordance with 2 CFR 200.320 Methods of Procurement to be Followed, The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and ?? 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in ? 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: (2) Small purchases - (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.214 Suspension and debarment, Non-federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. In accordance with 2CFR 200.403 Factors Affecting Allowability of Costs, except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: a. Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. b. Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. c. Be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the non-Federal entity. d. Be accorded consistent treatment. A cost may not be assigned to a Federal award as a direct cost if any other cost incurred for the same purpose in like circumstances has been allocated to the Federal award as an indirect cost. e. Be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), except, for state and local governments and Indian tribes only, as otherwise provided for in this part. f. Not be included as a cost or used to meet cost sharing or matching requirements of any other federally-financed program in either the current or a prior period. See also ? 200.306(b). g. Be adequately documented. See also ?? 200.300 through 200.309 of this part. h. Cost must be incurred during the approved budget period. The Federal awarding agency is authorized, at its discretion, to waive prior written approvals to carry forward unobligated balances to subsequent budget periods pursuant to ? 200.308(e)(3). In accordance with OMB Compliance Supplement, Part 6 ? Internal Control, non-Federal entities receiving Federal awards establish and maintain internal control over the Federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal awards. EFFECT Program requirements were not complied with. The School may not have received the best pricing for goods or services. CAUSE Procurement procedures were not established to ensure compliance with federal regulations, including retention of quotes from an adequate number of vendors and suspension and debarment requirements. Additionally, internal controls were not designed appropriately to ensure that expenditures charged to the grant were periodically compared to the grant budgets to determine if budget amendments should be submitted. RECOMMENDATION AND BENEFIT A control system should be developed and implemented to monitor when federal expenditures require procurement, that all documentation is obtained and retained and vendors are reviewed for suspension and debarment. Additionally, internal controls should be modified to periodically compare actual expenditures under the grant with submitted budgets. This will help ensure that program requirements are complied with, the School only uses vendors that have not been suspended or debarred and budget amendments are submitted timely. VIEWS OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS See Corrective Action Plan.
REFERENCE: 2022-101 CFDA NUMBER 84.425D ? COVID 19 ? EDUCATION STABILIZATION FUND CFDA NUMBER 84.425U ? COVID 19 ? EDUCATION STABILIZATION FUND U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION ? 2021 PASSED THROUGH ARIZONA STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION GRANT NUMBER: S425D210038 & S425U210038 QUESTIONED COSTS N/A CONDITION The following errors were noted during testing of allowable costs, activities and procurement: ? For 1 of 3 vendors tested for procurement, only 1 quote was available for review. ? Vendors were not evaluated for suspension or debarment prior to purchases being made. ? For 3 of 12 disbursements tested, although the purchases are allowable under the grants, the purchases were not included in the grant budgets submitted to the Arizona Department of Education. Amended budgets were submitted on August 31, 2022. CRITERIA In accordance with 2 CFR 200.320 Methods of Procurement to be Followed, The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and ?? 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in ? 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: (2) Small purchases - (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.214 Suspension and debarment, Non-federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. In accordance with 2CFR 200.403 Factors Affecting Allowability of Costs, except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: a. Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. b. Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. c. Be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the non-Federal entity. d. Be accorded consistent treatment. A cost may not be assigned to a Federal award as a direct cost if any other cost incurred for the same purpose in like circumstances has been allocated to the Federal award as an indirect cost. e. Be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), except, for state and local governments and Indian tribes only, as otherwise provided for in this part. f. Not be included as a cost or used to meet cost sharing or matching requirements of any other federally-financed program in either the current or a prior period. See also ? 200.306(b). g. Be adequately documented. See also ?? 200.300 through 200.309 of this part. h. Cost must be incurred during the approved budget period. The Federal awarding agency is authorized, at its discretion, to waive prior written approvals to carry forward unobligated balances to subsequent budget periods pursuant to ? 200.308(e)(3). In accordance with OMB Compliance Supplement, Part 6 ? Internal Control, non-Federal entities receiving Federal awards establish and maintain internal control over the Federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal awards. EFFECT Program requirements were not complied with. The School may not have received the best pricing for goods or services. CAUSE Procurement procedures were not established to ensure compliance with federal regulations, including retention of quotes from an adequate number of vendors and suspension and debarment requirements. Additionally, internal controls were not designed appropriately to ensure that expenditures charged to the grant were periodically compared to the grant budgets to determine if budget amendments should be submitted. RECOMMENDATION AND BENEFIT A control system should be developed and implemented to monitor when federal expenditures require procurement, that all documentation is obtained and retained and vendors are reviewed for suspension and debarment. Additionally, internal controls should be modified to periodically compare actual expenditures under the grant with submitted budgets. This will help ensure that program requirements are complied with, the School only uses vendors that have not been suspended or debarred and budget amendments are submitted timely. VIEWS OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS See Corrective Action Plan.
SD 2022-001: PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE Assistance Listing No. 59.075 Shuttered Venue Operators Grant Program 2022 Funding U.S. Small Business Administration Criteria: The Uniform Guidance specifies that a non-Federal entity may charge to the Federal award only allowable costs incurred during the period of performance. Guidance is found under Standards for Financial and Program Management (200.309). Recipients of the supplemental award can spend all award funds (both initial and supplemental phase awards) received over an 18-month period after the initial phase award issuance date for eligible and allowable costs incurred between March 1, 2020 and June 30, 2022. Pre-award costs can be charged if they are authorized by the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity (200.458). Additionally, under 2 CFR 200.303, non-Federal entities must establish and maintain effective internal controls to provide reasonable assurance of compliance with the Uniform Guidance. Condition: Grant funds were disbursed for marketing expenses incurred prior to the start of the funding period without approval of the granting agency. Marketing expenses incurred prior to March 1, 2020 were applied to the grant as they related to producing a theatrical or live performing arts productions that were scheduled to occur during March and April of 2020 but cancelled due to the impacts of COVID-19. Cause: The control did not operate effectively as the reviewer did not have a sufficient understanding of the grant requirements. Perspective: There was initially $9,344 of expenses applied to the grant. Effect: Shuttered venue operators grant funding was applied to expenses incurred outside the period of availability. Prior to the report being filed the Center utilized other expenses that were within the period of availability. Questioned Costs: $0 Recommendation: Only allowable costs incurred during the period of performance should be charged to the federal award. Supporting documentation should be reviewed in conjunction with the grant agreement and other applicable compliance requirements including statutes and uniform reporting requirements for restrictions, limitations, and conditions pertaining to the grant to minimize the amount of disallowed costs. Management Response: Management concurs with the suggestion. Grant personnel has been reminded to review supporting documentation in conjunction with the grant agreement and other applicable compliance requirements including statutes and uniform reporting requirements for restrictions, limitations, and conditions pertaining to the grant to minimize the amount of disallowed costs.
FINDING 2022-010 Subject: Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies - Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies Assistance Listings Number: 84.010 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S010A190014, S010A200014, S010A190014SIG Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context The School Corporation had not properly designed or implemented a system of internal controls to ensure that proper documentation was retained for audit. A sample of forty transactions charged to the Title I grants during the audit period was selected for testing. The following errors were noted: 1. The School Corporation was unable to provide supporting documentation for three transactions, totaling $6,272. As such, these transactions were unable to be verified as allowable activities or costs for the Title I program. 2. Seven transactions, totaling $887, were for fringe benefit claims; however, the supporting documentation provided did not include details to identify the employees for which the benefits were paid. As a result, we were unable to determine if the payments were on behalf of allowable staff related to the Title I program. 3. Four transactions selected were for a Title I employee's payroll who did not have an approved hourly rate. The total amount of the four transactions paid to that employee was $4,261. 4. For two transactions tested, the payroll check register reported the employee was paid for more hours than was reported on their approved timecard. The additional amount paid to the employee was $1,374. Due to the number and magnitude of exceptions identified, per auditor judgment, we concluded it would not be appropriate to examine the remaining twenty-four transactions. The errors noted above were considered questioned costs. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal controls over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.334 states in part: "Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal entity records pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report or, for Federal awards that are renewed quarterly or annually, from the date of the submission of the quarterly or annual financial report, respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass through entity in the case of a subrecipient. . . ." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 2 CFR 200.430(i) states in part: "Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses (1) Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: (i) Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated; (ii) Be incorporated into the official records of the non-Federal entity; (iii) Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non-Federal entity, not exceeding 100% of compensated activities (for IHE, this per the IHE's definition of IBS); . . . (vii) Support the distribution of the employee's salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and non-Federal award; an indirect cost activity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities which are allocated using different allocation bases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity. . . ." 2 CFR 200.309 states: "A non-Federal entity may charge to the Federal award only allowable costs incurred during the period of performance (except as described in ? 200.461 Publication and printing costs) and any costs incurred before the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity made the Federal award that were authorized by the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity." Cause Management had not established an effective system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance, or that supporting documentation would have been maintained and made available for audit, with the grant agreement and the Activities Allowed or Unallowed and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements. Effect The failure to establish an effective system of internal controls and to retain and provide appropriate supporting documentation prevented the determination of the School Corporation's compliance with the compliance requirements listed above. Questioned Costs Known questioned costs of $12,794 were identified, as detailed in Condition and Context. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish an effective system of internal controls to ensure documentation be maintained and made available for audit related to the grant agreement and the Activities Allowed or Unallowed and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-010 Subject: Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies - Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies Assistance Listings Number: 84.010 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S010A190014, S010A200014, S010A190014SIG Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context The School Corporation had not properly designed or implemented a system of internal controls to ensure that proper documentation was retained for audit. A sample of forty transactions charged to the Title I grants during the audit period was selected for testing. The following errors were noted: 1. The School Corporation was unable to provide supporting documentation for three transactions, totaling $6,272. As such, these transactions were unable to be verified as allowable activities or costs for the Title I program. 2. Seven transactions, totaling $887, were for fringe benefit claims; however, the supporting documentation provided did not include details to identify the employees for which the benefits were paid. As a result, we were unable to determine if the payments were on behalf of allowable staff related to the Title I program. 3. Four transactions selected were for a Title I employee's payroll who did not have an approved hourly rate. The total amount of the four transactions paid to that employee was $4,261. 4. For two transactions tested, the payroll check register reported the employee was paid for more hours than was reported on their approved timecard. The additional amount paid to the employee was $1,374. Due to the number and magnitude of exceptions identified, per auditor judgment, we concluded it would not be appropriate to examine the remaining twenty-four transactions. The errors noted above were considered questioned costs. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal controls over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.334 states in part: "Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal entity records pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report or, for Federal awards that are renewed quarterly or annually, from the date of the submission of the quarterly or annual financial report, respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass through entity in the case of a subrecipient. . . ." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 2 CFR 200.430(i) states in part: "Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses (1) Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: (i) Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated; (ii) Be incorporated into the official records of the non-Federal entity; (iii) Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non-Federal entity, not exceeding 100% of compensated activities (for IHE, this per the IHE's definition of IBS); . . . (vii) Support the distribution of the employee's salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and non-Federal award; an indirect cost activity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities which are allocated using different allocation bases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity. . . ." 2 CFR 200.309 states: "A non-Federal entity may charge to the Federal award only allowable costs incurred during the period of performance (except as described in ? 200.461 Publication and printing costs) and any costs incurred before the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity made the Federal award that were authorized by the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity." Cause Management had not established an effective system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance, or that supporting documentation would have been maintained and made available for audit, with the grant agreement and the Activities Allowed or Unallowed and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements. Effect The failure to establish an effective system of internal controls and to retain and provide appropriate supporting documentation prevented the determination of the School Corporation's compliance with the compliance requirements listed above. Questioned Costs Known questioned costs of $12,794 were identified, as detailed in Condition and Context. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish an effective system of internal controls to ensure documentation be maintained and made available for audit related to the grant agreement and the Activities Allowed or Unallowed and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
Reference Number: 2022-018 Prior Year Finding: 2021-014 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services State Department Name: Department of Health and Social Services State Division Name: Division of Medicaid and Medical Assistance Federal Program: Children?s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) Assistance Listing Number: 93.767 Award Number and Year: 2205DE5021 (10/1/2021 ? 9/30/2023) Compliance Requirement: Period of Performance Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance, Material Noncompliance Criteria or specific requirement: Compliance: A non-federal entity may charge only allowable costs incurred during the approved budget period of a federal award?s period of performance and any costs incurred before the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity made the federal award that were authorized by the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity (2 CFR sections 200.308 200.309 and 200.403(h)). A period of performance may contain one or more budget periods. Control: Per 2 CFR Section 200.303(a), a non-Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should comply with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework?, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition: Costs were incurred and charged to the federal grant prior to the allowable start of the period of performance. Further, the Division was unable to provide support for a transaction selected for testing. Context: Eighteen transactions were selected for testing, and we noted the following exceptions: ? Six of eighteen transactions were charged before the allowable period of performance. ? For one of eighteen transactions, the Division was unable to provide supporting documentation and compliance with period of performance could not be verified. Questioned costs: $44,567 represents transactions unsupported or incurred and charged prior to the award?s allowable period of performance. Cause: The Division did not enhance their internal controls and procedures to ensure that expenditures charged to the program were incurred within the award?s period of performance nor that it maintained supporting documentation for expenditures charged to the award. Effect: Costs could be deemed unallowable by the awarding agency if funds are expended outside of the allowable period of performance. Recommendation: The Division should review and enhance internal controls and procedures to ensure that it charges expenditures to the program that are incurred within an award?s allowable period of performance, that it maintains supporting documentation, and that supporting documentation is available for audit. Views of responsible officials: The Division will review and enhance internal controls to ensure program expenditures are properly charged. Questioned costs are due to the reporting requirements of this grant. Payments are made based on when invoices are received. Federal requirement is that CHIP draws, expenditures and reporting are done on a cost basis. DMMA reports based on the date of the draw, not the date of the invoice. The Division is exploring ways to meet all grant compliance requirements.
2022-001 Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Special Education Cluster Pass-Through Agency: Massachusetts State Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE) Pass-Through Number(s): Various ? See Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Assistance Listing Numbers: 84.027, 84.173 Award Period: September 30, 2019 ? December 31, 2021 Type of Finding: ? Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance ? Other Matters Compliance Requirement: Period of Performance Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR Part 200, 200.309 states that a non-federal agency may charge to the federal award only allowable costs incurred during the period of performance. Condition: The Town of Stoneham, Massachusetts did not have adequate controls designed to ensure expenditures charged to the grant were incurred during the period of performance. Questioned Costs: None Reportable Context: For 1 of 1 transaction tested, we identified the Town charged expenditures to the grant that were incurred outside the period of performance, after the end date of the grant. Cause: Procedures are not in place to ensure expenditures charged to the grant were incurred during the period of performance. Effect: The expenditures incurred after the period of performance are subject to disallowance and are considered questioned costs. Recommendation: We recommend procedures be implemented to ensure that all costs charged to the grant are incurred within the grant period of performance. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding.
2022-001 Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Special Education Cluster Pass-Through Agency: Massachusetts State Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE) Pass-Through Number(s): Various ? See Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Assistance Listing Numbers: 84.027, 84.173 Award Period: September 30, 2019 ? December 31, 2021 Type of Finding: ? Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance ? Other Matters Compliance Requirement: Period of Performance Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR Part 200, 200.309 states that a non-federal agency may charge to the federal award only allowable costs incurred during the period of performance. Condition: The Town of Stoneham, Massachusetts did not have adequate controls designed to ensure expenditures charged to the grant were incurred during the period of performance. Questioned Costs: None Reportable Context: For 1 of 1 transaction tested, we identified the Town charged expenditures to the grant that were incurred outside the period of performance, after the end date of the grant. Cause: Procedures are not in place to ensure expenditures charged to the grant were incurred during the period of performance. Effect: The expenditures incurred after the period of performance are subject to disallowance and are considered questioned costs. Recommendation: We recommend procedures be implemented to ensure that all costs charged to the grant are incurred within the grant period of performance. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding.
2022-001 Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Special Education Cluster Pass-Through Agency: Massachusetts State Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE) Pass-Through Number(s): Various ? See Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Assistance Listing Numbers: 84.027, 84.173 Award Period: September 30, 2019 ? December 31, 2021 Type of Finding: ? Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance ? Other Matters Compliance Requirement: Period of Performance Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR Part 200, 200.309 states that a non-federal agency may charge to the federal award only allowable costs incurred during the period of performance. Condition: The Town of Stoneham, Massachusetts did not have adequate controls designed to ensure expenditures charged to the grant were incurred during the period of performance. Questioned Costs: None Reportable Context: For 1 of 1 transaction tested, we identified the Town charged expenditures to the grant that were incurred outside the period of performance, after the end date of the grant. Cause: Procedures are not in place to ensure expenditures charged to the grant were incurred during the period of performance. Effect: The expenditures incurred after the period of performance are subject to disallowance and are considered questioned costs. Recommendation: We recommend procedures be implemented to ensure that all costs charged to the grant are incurred within the grant period of performance. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding.
2022-001 Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Special Education Cluster Pass-Through Agency: Massachusetts State Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE) Pass-Through Number(s): Various ? See Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Assistance Listing Numbers: 84.027, 84.173 Award Period: September 30, 2019 ? December 31, 2021 Type of Finding: ? Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance ? Other Matters Compliance Requirement: Period of Performance Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR Part 200, 200.309 states that a non-federal agency may charge to the federal award only allowable costs incurred during the period of performance. Condition: The Town of Stoneham, Massachusetts did not have adequate controls designed to ensure expenditures charged to the grant were incurred during the period of performance. Questioned Costs: None Reportable Context: For 1 of 1 transaction tested, we identified the Town charged expenditures to the grant that were incurred outside the period of performance, after the end date of the grant. Cause: Procedures are not in place to ensure expenditures charged to the grant were incurred during the period of performance. Effect: The expenditures incurred after the period of performance are subject to disallowance and are considered questioned costs. Recommendation: We recommend procedures be implemented to ensure that all costs charged to the grant are incurred within the grant period of performance. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding.
2022-001 Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Special Education Cluster Pass-Through Agency: Massachusetts State Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE) Pass-Through Number(s): Various ? See Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Assistance Listing Numbers: 84.027, 84.173 Award Period: September 30, 2019 ? December 31, 2021 Type of Finding: ? Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance ? Other Matters Compliance Requirement: Period of Performance Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR Part 200, 200.309 states that a non-federal agency may charge to the federal award only allowable costs incurred during the period of performance. Condition: The Town of Stoneham, Massachusetts did not have adequate controls designed to ensure expenditures charged to the grant were incurred during the period of performance. Questioned Costs: None Reportable Context: For 1 of 1 transaction tested, we identified the Town charged expenditures to the grant that were incurred outside the period of performance, after the end date of the grant. Cause: Procedures are not in place to ensure expenditures charged to the grant were incurred during the period of performance. Effect: The expenditures incurred after the period of performance are subject to disallowance and are considered questioned costs. Recommendation: We recommend procedures be implemented to ensure that all costs charged to the grant are incurred within the grant period of performance. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding.
2022-001 Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Special Education Cluster Pass-Through Agency: Massachusetts State Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE) Pass-Through Number(s): Various ? See Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Assistance Listing Numbers: 84.027, 84.173 Award Period: September 30, 2019 ? December 31, 2021 Type of Finding: ? Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance ? Other Matters Compliance Requirement: Period of Performance Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR Part 200, 200.309 states that a non-federal agency may charge to the federal award only allowable costs incurred during the period of performance. Condition: The Town of Stoneham, Massachusetts did not have adequate controls designed to ensure expenditures charged to the grant were incurred during the period of performance. Questioned Costs: None Reportable Context: For 1 of 1 transaction tested, we identified the Town charged expenditures to the grant that were incurred outside the period of performance, after the end date of the grant. Cause: Procedures are not in place to ensure expenditures charged to the grant were incurred during the period of performance. Effect: The expenditures incurred after the period of performance are subject to disallowance and are considered questioned costs. Recommendation: We recommend procedures be implemented to ensure that all costs charged to the grant are incurred within the grant period of performance. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding.