FINDING 2023-002 Subject: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds - Period of Performance Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Federal Program: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listings Number: 21.027 Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): CY 2023 Compliance Requirement: Period of Performance Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context On December 15, 2020, the City entered into a Lease-Purchase agreement with the Crossroads Bank for police and fire radios. On August 28, 2023, the City made a payment of $2,431,243 to the Crossroads Bank to pay the remaining balance due for the police and fire radios from its Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF) allocation. Per SLFRF program regulations, the period of performance for the SLFRF award began on March 3, 2021, when the funds were disbursed by the grantor agency. All costs must be incurred by December 31, 2024, and funds must be liquidated before December 31, 2026. Although the City's purchase is an eligible purchase under the SLFRF Final Rule, the purchase was initiated and approved by the City prior to the SLFRF period of performance beginning date of March 3, 2021. Further, the project was not prospective in nature, and the City incurred a financial obligation prior to the beginning of the period of performance. As such, the payment of $2,431,243 was determined to be questioned costs. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 31 CFR 35.5(a) states: "In general. A recipient may only use funds for the purposes enumerated in § 35.6 (b) through (f) to cover costs incurred during the period beginning March 3, 2021, and ending December 31, 2024, subject to the restrictions set forth in sections 602(c)(2) and 603(c)(2) of the Social Security Act, as applicable. A recipient may only use funds for the purposes enumerated in § 35.6 (g) through (h) to cover costs incurred during the period beginning December 29, 2022, and ending December 31, 2024, subject to the restrictions set forth in sections 602(c)(2), 602(c)(5)(C), 603(c)(2), and 603(c)(6)(B) of the Social Security Act, as applicable." 31 CFR 35.3 states in part: ". . . Obligation means an order placed for property and services and entering into contracts, subawards, and similar transactions that require payment. . . ." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: . . . (h) Cost must be incurred during the approved budget period. The Federal awarding agency is authorized, at its discretion, to waive prior written approvals to carry forward unobligated balances to subsequent budget periods pursuant to § 200.308(e)(3)." Cause Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the City's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these polices. The system of internal controls, as designed and implemented by management of the City, was not effective to ensure SLFRF funds were used appropriately. The original date of the contract was not considered when determining the funding source of the payment. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, a payment on a debt associated with a project outside of the period of performance occurred. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the City. Questioned Costs Known questioned costs in the amount of $2,431,243 were identified as noted in the Condition and Context. Recommendation We recommended that management of the City establish a system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure SLFRF funds are used appropriately. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
Finding 2023-002 Significant deficiency in internal controls over compliance related to period of performance. Federal Agency: Department of Health and Human Services Program Title: Unaccompanied Alien Children Program Assistance Listing Number: 93.676 Award Numbers: 90ZU0339/03 and 90ZU0587/01 Project Period: February 1, 2022 - October 31, 2023 and November 1, 2023 - October 31, 2024 Criteria A non-federal entity may charge only allowable costs incurred during the approved budget period of a federal award’s period of performance. Any costs incurred before the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity made the federal award, must be authorized by the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity (2 CFR sections 200.308 200.309 and 200.403(h)). Condition/Context for Evaluation During the audit for the year ending December 31, 2023, we noted four instances out of 40 where the Organization charged costs to the grant that were outside of the period of performance for the related award. Questioned Costs 90ZU0339/03 - $995 90ZU0587/01 - $408 Cause The Organization’s internal controls were not sufficient to ensure proper cutoff of grant expenditures and the allocation to the related award. Effect or Potential Effect Unallowable costs were charged to the grant. Repeat Finding Not Applicable. Recommendation We recommend that management develop internal controls for appropriate cutoff of grant expenditures and review to ensure the appropriate costs were charged to the budgeted period to the grant. Views of Responsible Officials of Auditee Management concurs with the finding and has provided the accompanying management corrective action.
Finding 2023-002 Significant deficiency in internal controls over compliance related to period of performance. Federal Agency: Department of Health and Human Services Program Title: Unaccompanied Alien Children Program Assistance Listing Number: 93.676 Award Numbers: 90ZU0339/03 and 90ZU0587/01 Project Period: February 1, 2022 - October 31, 2023 and November 1, 2023 - October 31, 2024 Criteria A non-federal entity may charge only allowable costs incurred during the approved budget period of a federal award’s period of performance. Any costs incurred before the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity made the federal award, must be authorized by the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity (2 CFR sections 200.308 200.309 and 200.403(h)). Condition/Context for Evaluation During the audit for the year ending December 31, 2023, we noted four instances out of 40 where the Organization charged costs to the grant that were outside of the period of performance for the related award. Questioned Costs 90ZU0339/03 - $995 90ZU0587/01 - $408 Cause The Organization’s internal controls were not sufficient to ensure proper cutoff of grant expenditures and the allocation to the related award. Effect or Potential Effect Unallowable costs were charged to the grant. Repeat Finding Not Applicable. Recommendation We recommend that management develop internal controls for appropriate cutoff of grant expenditures and review to ensure the appropriate costs were charged to the budgeted period to the grant. Views of Responsible Officials of Auditee Management concurs with the finding and has provided the accompanying management corrective action.
2 CFR § 2400.101 gives regulatory effect to the Department of Housing and Urban Development for 2 CFR § 200.303(a) which requires that the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). 2 CFR § 2400.101 gives regulatory effect to the Department of Housing and Urban Development for 2 CFR § 200.403 which states except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. (c) Be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the non-Federal entity. (d) Be accorded consistent treatment. A cost may not be assigned to a Federal award as a direct cost if any other cost incurred for the same purpose in like circumstances has been allocated to the Federal award as an indirect cost. (e) Be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), except, for state and local governments and Indian tribes only, as otherwise provided for in this part. (f) Not be included as a cost or used to meet cost sharing or matching requirements of any other federally-financed program in either the current or a prior period. See also § 200.306(b). (g) Be adequately documented. See also §§ 200.300 through 200.309 of this part. (h) Cost must be incurred during the approved budget period. The Federal awarding agency is authorized, at its discretion, to waive prior written approvals to carry forward unobligated balances to subsequent budget periods pursuant to § 200.308(e)(3). State ex rel. McClure v. Hagerman, 155 Ohio St. 320 (1951) provides that expenditures made by a governmental unit should serve a public purpose. Typically, the determination of what constitutes a “proper public purpose” rests with the judgment of the governmental entity, unless such determination is arbitrary or unreasonable. Even if a purchase is reasonable, Ohio Attorney General Opinion 82-006 indicates that it must be memorialized by a duly enacted ordinance or resolution and may have a prospective effect only. Auditor of State Bulletin 2003-005 Expenditure of Public Funds/Proper “Public Purpose” states, in part, the Auditor of State’s Office will only question expenditures where the legislative determination of a public purpose is manifestly arbitrary and incorrect. The Lima-Allen County Regional Planning Commission, administrator of the Community Housing Impact and Preservation Program - CHIP (#B-C-21-1AB-1) for Allen County, incurred a charge of $4,386 for Admin January 2023 charges on invoice #106558 dated February 7, 2023 from the Great Lakes Community Action Partnership. On July 6, 2023, check number 7330652 was issued by Allen County which included payment of $4,386 on invoice number 106558. On August 3, 2023, check number 7332670 was issued by Allen County which included payment of $4,386 on invoice number 106558 which was approved by Tara Bales, Executive Director of the Lima-Allen County Regional Planning Commission. As a result, possibly due to the failure of an existing control or procedure, invoice number 106558 was paid twice resulting an overpayment of $4,386. On October 2, 2024, the Great Lakes Community Action Partnership refunded the overpayment with check number 20765 in the amount of $4,386. This refund was recorded in the Community Development Grant Fund (2414). The Lima-Allen County Regional Planning Commission should implement an additional control(s) and/or procedure(s) to prevent the duplicate payment of invoices.
2023-014 Period of Performance Assistance Listing No.: 14.267 Continuum of Care Program Condition: The Organization was unable to demonstrate consistent controls over the period of performance requirement. Criteria: The requirements for the period of performance are contained in 2 CFR section 200.1 Definitions for “budget period,” “financial obligations,” “period of performance,” 2 CFR section 200.308 (revision of budget and program plans), 2 CFR section 200.309 (modifications to period of performance), 2 CFR section 200.344 (closeout), program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations; and the terms and conditions of the award. Questioned Costs There are no questioned costs. Cause: The Organization did not have good controls on ensuring the period of performance requirement was met due to staff turn over. Effect: The Organization could have grant expenditures outside the grant period. Perspective: Thirty-one of forty items selected for testing did not have documentation of the control over compliance with the period of performance requirement. Repeat Finding: This is a repeat finding. See finding 2022-017. Recommendation: In order to prevent future occurences of this deficiency, we recommend that management expand controls to ensure that they are able to demonstrate that all expenses meet their procurement policy. Auditee's Response: The Organization agrees with the finding. See attached corrective action plan.
2023-014 Period of Performance Assistance Listing No.: 14.267 Continuum of Care Program Condition: The Organization was unable to demonstrate consistent controls over the period of performance requirement. Criteria: The requirements for the period of performance are contained in 2 CFR section 200.1 Definitions for “budget period,” “financial obligations,” “period of performance,” 2 CFR section 200.308 (revision of budget and program plans), 2 CFR section 200.309 (modifications to period of performance), 2 CFR section 200.344 (closeout), program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations; and the terms and conditions of the award. Questioned Costs There are no questioned costs. Cause: The Organization did not have good controls on ensuring the period of performance requirement was met due to staff turn over. Effect: The Organization could have grant expenditures outside the grant period. Perspective: Thirty-one of forty items selected for testing did not have documentation of the control over compliance with the period of performance requirement. Repeat Finding: This is a repeat finding. See finding 2022-017. Recommendation: In order to prevent future occurences of this deficiency, we recommend that management expand controls to ensure that they are able to demonstrate that all expenses meet their procurement policy. Auditee's Response: The Organization agrees with the finding. See attached corrective action plan.
2023-014 Period of Performance Assistance Listing No.: 14.267 Continuum of Care Program Condition: The Organization was unable to demonstrate consistent controls over the period of performance requirement. Criteria: The requirements for the period of performance are contained in 2 CFR section 200.1 Definitions for “budget period,” “financial obligations,” “period of performance,” 2 CFR section 200.308 (revision of budget and program plans), 2 CFR section 200.309 (modifications to period of performance), 2 CFR section 200.344 (closeout), program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations; and the terms and conditions of the award. Questioned Costs There are no questioned costs. Cause: The Organization did not have good controls on ensuring the period of performance requirement was met due to staff turn over. Effect: The Organization could have grant expenditures outside the grant period. Perspective: Thirty-one of forty items selected for testing did not have documentation of the control over compliance with the period of performance requirement. Repeat Finding: This is a repeat finding. See finding 2022-017. Recommendation: In order to prevent future occurences of this deficiency, we recommend that management expand controls to ensure that they are able to demonstrate that all expenses meet their procurement policy. Auditee's Response: The Organization agrees with the finding. See attached corrective action plan.
FINDING 2023-003 Subject: COVID-19 - Emergency Rental Assistance Program - Period of Performance Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Federal Program: COVID-19 - Emergency Rental Assistance Program Assistance Listings Number: 21.023 Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): ERA-0359 Compliance Requirement: Period of Performance Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 22 LAKE COUNTY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Condition and Context The County received a federal Emergency Rental Assistance (ERA) Program grant, that was created during the COVID-19 pandemic, to help provide financial and housing stability assistance to eligible households to help prevent eviction and ensure stable housing. Recipients had a period of performance to incur costs that was between the start of the grant until September 30, 2022, for the Emergency Rental Assistance Program 1 (ERA1) and could be extended until December 29, 2022, if the recipient received reallocated funds from the Department of the Treasury. The County did receive reallocated funds from the Department of the Treasury; therefore, the County had until December 29, 2022, to incur costs for the ERA1 program. The costs that were incurred during the period of performance then had a liquation date of April 28, 2023. The County did not have internal controls in place to ensure costs were incurred within the grant period of performance and those costs incurred were properly paid by the liquidation date. Five out of seven of the expenditures tested, totaling $124,787, were for costs incurred after the period of performance. One expenditure included a December obligation to a subrecipient of $31,026, which was within the period of performance. But, the County did not pay the subrecipient by the liquidation date, so a total of $155,813 was paid after the liquidation date. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: . . . (h) Cost must be incurred during the approved budget period. The Federal awarding agency is authorized, at its discretion, to waive prior written approvals to carry forward unobligated balances to subsequent budget periods pursuant to § 200.308(e)(3)." Cause Due to turnover in the Economic Development Department and lack of knowledge of the period of performance dates of the ERA1 program, noncompliance went undetected by the County. Effect Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and terms and conditions of the federal award resulted in the request by the Department of the Treasury for the County to refund $154,945. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 23 LAKE COUNTY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Questioned Costs We identified $155,813 in known questioned costs as noted above in the Condition and Context. Recommendation We recommended that management of the County establish a system of internal controls to ensure compliance with period of performance requirements. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
2023 – 005 Period of Performance Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program Name: Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP) Assistance Listing Number: 93.568 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: G-2302ILLIEA 10/1/2022; G-2202ILLIEA 10/1/2021 Pass-Through Agency: Illinois Department of Commerce and Economic Opportunity Pass-Through Numbers: 23-221038; 22-224038 Award Period: June 1, 2023 through September 30, 2024 and October 1, 2021 through June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: • Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Uniform Grant Guidance (2 CFR 200.303) requires non-federal entities receiving Federal awards establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal laws, regulations, and program compliance requirements. Uniform Grant Guidance (2 CFR 200.308, 200.309, and 200.403(h)) requires non-federal entities charge only allowable costs incurred during the approved budget period of a general award’s period of performance. Effective internal controls should include procedures to ensure transactions for costs recorded for the beginning of the period of performance were not incurred prior to the start of the period of performance and transactions for cost recorded for the end of the period of performance were not incurred after the end of the period of performance for Federal awards. Condition: The County allocated costs to federal awards prior to the beginning of the period of performance and after the end of the period of performance. Questioned costs: $31,837 Context: 9 of 10 transactions tested were incurred prior to the period of performance and 1 of 15 transactions tested were incurred after the period of performance end date. Cause: Costs were inadvertently claimed that fell outside the period of performance. Effect: May result in unallowable costs being charged to the Federal program. Repeat Finding: This finding is a partial repeat of a finding in the prior year. The prior year finding number was 2022-005. Recommendation: We recommend the County review its procedures relative to allocating costs to Federal programs, and ensure only cost within the grant period are included. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2023 – 005 Period of Performance Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program Name: Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP) Assistance Listing Number: 93.568 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: G-2302ILLIEA 10/1/2022; G-2202ILLIEA 10/1/2021 Pass-Through Agency: Illinois Department of Commerce and Economic Opportunity Pass-Through Numbers: 23-221038; 22-224038 Award Period: June 1, 2023 through September 30, 2024 and October 1, 2021 through June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: • Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Uniform Grant Guidance (2 CFR 200.303) requires non-federal entities receiving Federal awards establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal laws, regulations, and program compliance requirements. Uniform Grant Guidance (2 CFR 200.308, 200.309, and 200.403(h)) requires non-federal entities charge only allowable costs incurred during the approved budget period of a general award’s period of performance. Effective internal controls should include procedures to ensure transactions for costs recorded for the beginning of the period of performance were not incurred prior to the start of the period of performance and transactions for cost recorded for the end of the period of performance were not incurred after the end of the period of performance for Federal awards. Condition: The County allocated costs to federal awards prior to the beginning of the period of performance and after the end of the period of performance. Questioned costs: $31,837 Context: 9 of 10 transactions tested were incurred prior to the period of performance and 1 of 15 transactions tested were incurred after the period of performance end date. Cause: Costs were inadvertently claimed that fell outside the period of performance. Effect: May result in unallowable costs being charged to the Federal program. Repeat Finding: This finding is a partial repeat of a finding in the prior year. The prior year finding number was 2022-005. Recommendation: We recommend the County review its procedures relative to allocating costs to Federal programs, and ensure only cost within the grant period are included. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2023 – 005 Period of Performance Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program Name: Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP) Assistance Listing Number: 93.568 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: G-2302ILLIEA 10/1/2022; G-2202ILLIEA 10/1/2021 Pass-Through Agency: Illinois Department of Commerce and Economic Opportunity Pass-Through Numbers: 23-221038; 22-224038 Award Period: June 1, 2023 through September 30, 2024 and October 1, 2021 through June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: • Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Uniform Grant Guidance (2 CFR 200.303) requires non-federal entities receiving Federal awards establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal laws, regulations, and program compliance requirements. Uniform Grant Guidance (2 CFR 200.308, 200.309, and 200.403(h)) requires non-federal entities charge only allowable costs incurred during the approved budget period of a general award’s period of performance. Effective internal controls should include procedures to ensure transactions for costs recorded for the beginning of the period of performance were not incurred prior to the start of the period of performance and transactions for cost recorded for the end of the period of performance were not incurred after the end of the period of performance for Federal awards. Condition: The County allocated costs to federal awards prior to the beginning of the period of performance and after the end of the period of performance. Questioned costs: $31,837 Context: 9 of 10 transactions tested were incurred prior to the period of performance and 1 of 15 transactions tested were incurred after the period of performance end date. Cause: Costs were inadvertently claimed that fell outside the period of performance. Effect: May result in unallowable costs being charged to the Federal program. Repeat Finding: This finding is a partial repeat of a finding in the prior year. The prior year finding number was 2022-005. Recommendation: We recommend the County review its procedures relative to allocating costs to Federal programs, and ensure only cost within the grant period are included. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2023 – 005 Period of Performance Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program Name: Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP) Assistance Listing Number: 93.568 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: G-2302ILLIEA 10/1/2022; G-2202ILLIEA 10/1/2021 Pass-Through Agency: Illinois Department of Commerce and Economic Opportunity Pass-Through Numbers: 23-221038; 22-224038 Award Period: June 1, 2023 through September 30, 2024 and October 1, 2021 through June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: • Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Uniform Grant Guidance (2 CFR 200.303) requires non-federal entities receiving Federal awards establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal laws, regulations, and program compliance requirements. Uniform Grant Guidance (2 CFR 200.308, 200.309, and 200.403(h)) requires non-federal entities charge only allowable costs incurred during the approved budget period of a general award’s period of performance. Effective internal controls should include procedures to ensure transactions for costs recorded for the beginning of the period of performance were not incurred prior to the start of the period of performance and transactions for cost recorded for the end of the period of performance were not incurred after the end of the period of performance for Federal awards. Condition: The County allocated costs to federal awards prior to the beginning of the period of performance and after the end of the period of performance. Questioned costs: $31,837 Context: 9 of 10 transactions tested were incurred prior to the period of performance and 1 of 15 transactions tested were incurred after the period of performance end date. Cause: Costs were inadvertently claimed that fell outside the period of performance. Effect: May result in unallowable costs being charged to the Federal program. Repeat Finding: This finding is a partial repeat of a finding in the prior year. The prior year finding number was 2022-005. Recommendation: We recommend the County review its procedures relative to allocating costs to Federal programs, and ensure only cost within the grant period are included. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2023-001 – Internal Control over Compliance and Compliance with Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Information on Federal Program(s) - Department of Education Assistance Listing Number: 84.351 Assistance Listing Name: Arts in Education National Program Grant Award Numbers: S351A220007 Award Period: October 1, 2022 to September 30, 2023 Criteria or Specific Requirement – The Uniform Guidance in 2 CFR Section 200.303 requires that non-Federal entities receiving Federal awards (i.e., auditee management) establish and maintain internal control designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal statues, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In addition, per 2 CFR Section 200.403, “Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. (c) Be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the non-Federal entity. (d) Be accorded consistent treatment. A cost may not be assigned to a Federal award as a direct cost if any other cost incurred for the same purpose in like circumstances has been allocated to the Federal award as an indirect cost. (e) Be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), except, for state and local governments and Indian tribes only, as otherwise provided for in this part. (f) Not be included as a cost or used to meet cost sharing or matching requirements of any other federallyfinanced program in either the current or a prior period. (g) Be adequately documented. (h) Cost must be incurred during the approved budget period. The Federal awarding agency is authorized, at its discretion, to waive prior written approvals to carry forward unobligated balances to subsequent budget periods pursuant to § 200.308(e)(3).” Condition – In evaluating the Center’s compliance with the requirements of Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs Cost Principles, our test work identified two instances out of a sample of sixty payroll transactions, totaling $41,872.98, in which employees were not paid according to their contract. For the two exceptions, the employees were underpaid a total of $1.48. Cause – The Center did not adhere to their internal process to ensure approved salary information was accurately applied. Effect or Potential Effect – Without adequate internal controls in place to ensure costs are properly verified and applied, the Center could inaccurately charge expenditures to the federal program. Questioned Costs – N/A Context – This is a condition based on testing of the Center’s compliance. Based on tested samples, we noted a total underpayment of $1.48. The prevalence of the finding is detailed in the condition section above. The samples were selected using a non-statistical method. Repeat Finding – This is a repeat finding from prior year. While the prior year finding resulted in a net overpayment and current year finding resulted in a net underpayment, the fact that management is not adhering to their internal control processes requires this finding to be considered a repeat finding. This was reported as finding 2022-002 in the 2022 report. Recommendation - We recommend management ensure the Center strengthen their internal process to ensure that employee salary information recorded in the payroll system are approved, supported by salary documentation in the personnel files, and accurately applied. Views of Responsible Officials – After performing a detailed analysis, the Center’s management identified that the likely net underpayment amounted to $111.52, while the likely net overpayment was $83.20. The likely underpayment and overpayment were determined by management through examination of the total salary charged to the federal program. The Center’s management agrees with the finding and will strengthen the internal process surrounding the activities allowed or unallowed and allowable costs and will ensure adequate documentation is in place and approved salary rates are consistently and properly applied. See the Center’s corrective action for more details.
2023-001 – Internal Control over Compliance and Compliance with Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Information on Federal Program(s) - Department of Education Assistance Listing Number: 84.351 Assistance Listing Name: Arts in Education National Program Grant Award Numbers: S351A220007 Award Period: October 1, 2022 to September 30, 2023 Criteria or Specific Requirement – The Uniform Guidance in 2 CFR Section 200.303 requires that non-Federal entities receiving Federal awards (i.e., auditee management) establish and maintain internal control designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal statues, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In addition, per 2 CFR Section 200.403, “Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. (c) Be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the non-Federal entity. (d) Be accorded consistent treatment. A cost may not be assigned to a Federal award as a direct cost if any other cost incurred for the same purpose in like circumstances has been allocated to the Federal award as an indirect cost. (e) Be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), except, for state and local governments and Indian tribes only, as otherwise provided for in this part. (f) Not be included as a cost or used to meet cost sharing or matching requirements of any other federallyfinanced program in either the current or a prior period. (g) Be adequately documented. (h) Cost must be incurred during the approved budget period. The Federal awarding agency is authorized, at its discretion, to waive prior written approvals to carry forward unobligated balances to subsequent budget periods pursuant to § 200.308(e)(3).” Condition – In evaluating the Center’s compliance with the requirements of Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs Cost Principles, our test work identified two instances out of a sample of sixty payroll transactions, totaling $41,872.98, in which employees were not paid according to their contract. For the two exceptions, the employees were underpaid a total of $1.48. Cause – The Center did not adhere to their internal process to ensure approved salary information was accurately applied. Effect or Potential Effect – Without adequate internal controls in place to ensure costs are properly verified and applied, the Center could inaccurately charge expenditures to the federal program. Questioned Costs – N/A Context – This is a condition based on testing of the Center’s compliance. Based on tested samples, we noted a total underpayment of $1.48. The prevalence of the finding is detailed in the condition section above. The samples were selected using a non-statistical method. Repeat Finding – This is a repeat finding from prior year. While the prior year finding resulted in a net overpayment and current year finding resulted in a net underpayment, the fact that management is not adhering to their internal control processes requires this finding to be considered a repeat finding. This was reported as finding 2022-002 in the 2022 report. Recommendation - We recommend management ensure the Center strengthen their internal process to ensure that employee salary information recorded in the payroll system are approved, supported by salary documentation in the personnel files, and accurately applied. Views of Responsible Officials – After performing a detailed analysis, the Center’s management identified that the likely net underpayment amounted to $111.52, while the likely net overpayment was $83.20. The likely underpayment and overpayment were determined by management through examination of the total salary charged to the federal program. The Center’s management agrees with the finding and will strengthen the internal process surrounding the activities allowed or unallowed and allowable costs and will ensure adequate documentation is in place and approved salary rates are consistently and properly applied. See the Center’s corrective action for more details.
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES 2023-004 Immunization Cooperative Agreements, ALN #93.268 Criteria: According to 2 CFR Section 200.308, all budget revisions over 10% must receive a budget revision from the grantee. Condition: Following a budget revision of over 10%, an approval was not received from the grantee. Cause: At direction from the pass-through agency, the Organization charged salary expenses to the contract services line items on its request reimbursement instead of getting budget revisions to reflect the change in the work performed. Effect: The costs billed on the vouchers for reimbursement, did not match the natural classification of the actual expenses incurred on the grant resulting in expenses reported being over budget on certain line items and under budget on others. Auditor recommendation: We recommend that when there is a budget revision over 10%, the Organization works with the grantor to get formal documentation to support the revision to ensure amounts charged to the grants are in line with budget line items. Management response: Management will ensure a budget revision be done for any increase over 10% and submit that to the grantor to receive formal approval from the grantor.
Prior Year Finding Number: 2022-002 Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Program: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund (CSLFRF) Pass through Entity: District of Columbia Office of the Deputy Mayor for Education -Office of Out of School Times Grant and Youth Outcomes, District of Columbia Human Services Rehousing Stabilization Program - Safe Passage Safe Blocks, D.C. Office of the Deputy Mayor Office Victim Services and Justice Grants and Office of Victim Services and Justice Grants Successful Reentry Program CFDA #: 21.027 Award #: 2023-SPSB-011-CSC, 2023-CSC-04, CW1010626, and 2023-AARPA-2004 Award Year: 10/01/2022-09/30/2023! Criteria: The Uniform Guidance in 2 CFR Section 200.303, Internal Controls, requires that non-federal entities receiving Federal awards (i.e., auditee management) establish and maintain internal control designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. In addition, 2 CFR 200.430 – Factors Affecting Allowability of Costs - Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. (c) Be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally financed and other activities of the non-Federal entity. (d) Be accorded consistent treatment. A cost may not be assigned to a federal award as a direct cost if any other incurred for the same purpose in like circumstances has been allocated to the Federal award as an indirect cost. (e) Be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), except, for state and local governments and Indian tribes only, as otherwise provided for in this part. (f) Not included as a cost or used to meet cost sharing or matching requirements of any other federally financed program in either the current or a prior period. (g) Be adequately documented. (h) Cost must be incurred during the approved budget period. The Federal awarding agency is authorized, at its discretion, to waive prior written approvals to carry forward unobligated balances to subsequent budget periods pursuant to §200.308(e)(3). The Personnel Section of the Executed Contract indicated specifies that: A. All staff, volunteers, and contractors, collectively called program personnel, who have regular unsupervised contact and direct interactions with youth, must possess the requisite training, qualifications, clearances, and competency to perform the duties to which they are assigned. B. All program personnel must have the following background checks in order to comply with the District of Columbia’s Criminal Background Checks for the Protection of Children Act of 2004. DC Code §§ 4-1501.01 – 4-1501.11 and other OST Office requirements: • DC Child and Family Services Agency (CFSA) Child Protection Registry (CPR); • Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Criminal Background Check; • Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) Criminal Background Check; and • National Sex Offender Registry. C. Any program personnel with the following felony convictions are not permitted to work or volunteer with children and youth: 1. Murder, attempted murder, manslaughter or arson; 2. Assault, battery, assault and battery, assault with a dangerous weapon, mayhem, or threats to do bodily harm; 3. Burglary; 4. Robbery; 5. Kidnapping; 6. Illegal use or possession of a firearm; 7. Sexual offenses, including indecent exposure; promoting, procuring, compelling, soliciting, or engaging in prostitution; corrupting minors (sexual relations with children); molesting; voyeurism; committing sex acts in public; incest; rape; sexual assault; sexual battery; or sexual abuse; but excluding sodomy between consenting adults; 8. Child abuse or cruelty to children; or 9. Unlawful distribution or possession of or possession with intent to distribute, a controlled substance. Condition: We sampled 60 payroll expense transactions and noted the following: • Four (4) instances in which time charged to this program was not recorded in the timesheets reviewed for the periods tested. The total of these transactions were $12,087. • Six (6) payroll transactions did not satisfy the prohibited felony background requirements as specified in the Safe Passage Safe Block grant agreement for personnel hired under this award. The total of these transactions were $16,404. • Six (6) payroll transactions from the Safe Passage Safe Block award did not show evidence of clearance by the D.C. Child and Family Services Child Protection Registry (CPR) and 2 CPRs provided were outside of the period tested. In addition, 5 CPR and First Aid training documentation were not provided. The total of these transactions were $15,585. Two (2) files did not show evidence of Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) criminal background checks as a condition for employment. Eight (8) MPD files requested were not provided. The total of these transactions were $39,102. Twenty-two (22) National Sex Offenders Registry records were not provided for persons hired under the program. This registry was managed directly by a District Agency and was not submitted to CSC. The total of these transactions were $71,408. Questioned Costs: $154,586 Context: This is a condition identified per review of CSC’s compliance with the specified requirements using a statistically valid sample. The known amount of the payroll transactions totaled $154,586. Effect: CSC is not in compliance with the stated provisions of the grant awards. Failure to properly review and support expenses can result in noncompliance with laws and regulations along with loss of funding. Cause: CSC did not appear to have adequate policies and procedures in place to ensure compliance with the required stipulations regarding background. Recommendation: We recommend that CSC ensure that personnel hired under the grant meet all the background and other checks within the stipulated time frame outlined in the grant agreement. We also recommend that CSC improve internal controls to ensure adherence to Federal regulations related to the fiscal and administrative requirements for expending and accounting for expenses incurred and reported.
Prior Year Finding Number: 2022-002 Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Program: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund (CSLFRF) Pass through Entity: District of Columbia Office of the Deputy Mayor for Education -Office of Out of School Times Grant and Youth Outcomes, District of Columbia Human Services Rehousing Stabilization Program - Safe Passage Safe Blocks, D.C. Office of the Deputy Mayor Office Victim Services and Justice Grants and Office of Victim Services and Justice Grants Successful Reentry Program CFDA #: 21.027 Award #: 2023-SPSB-011-CSC, 2023-CSC-04, CW1010626, and 2023-AARPA-2004 Award Year: 10/01/2022-09/30/2023! Criteria: The Uniform Guidance in 2 CFR Section 200.303, Internal Controls, requires that non-federal entities receiving Federal awards (i.e., auditee management) establish and maintain internal control designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. In addition, 2 CFR 200.430 – Factors Affecting Allowability of Costs - Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. (c) Be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally financed and other activities of the non-Federal entity. (d) Be accorded consistent treatment. A cost may not be assigned to a federal award as a direct cost if any other incurred for the same purpose in like circumstances has been allocated to the Federal award as an indirect cost. (e) Be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), except, for state and local governments and Indian tribes only, as otherwise provided for in this part. (f) Not included as a cost or used to meet cost sharing or matching requirements of any other federally financed program in either the current or a prior period. (g) Be adequately documented. (h) Cost must be incurred during the approved budget period. The Federal awarding agency is authorized, at its discretion, to waive prior written approvals to carry forward unobligated balances to subsequent budget periods pursuant to §200.308(e)(3). The Personnel Section of the Executed Contract indicated specifies that: A. All staff, volunteers, and contractors, collectively called program personnel, who have regular unsupervised contact and direct interactions with youth, must possess the requisite training, qualifications, clearances, and competency to perform the duties to which they are assigned. B. All program personnel must have the following background checks in order to comply with the District of Columbia’s Criminal Background Checks for the Protection of Children Act of 2004. DC Code §§ 4-1501.01 – 4-1501.11 and other OST Office requirements: • DC Child and Family Services Agency (CFSA) Child Protection Registry (CPR); • Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Criminal Background Check; • Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) Criminal Background Check; and • National Sex Offender Registry. C. Any program personnel with the following felony convictions are not permitted to work or volunteer with children and youth: 1. Murder, attempted murder, manslaughter or arson; 2. Assault, battery, assault and battery, assault with a dangerous weapon, mayhem, or threats to do bodily harm; 3. Burglary; 4. Robbery; 5. Kidnapping; 6. Illegal use or possession of a firearm; 7. Sexual offenses, including indecent exposure; promoting, procuring, compelling, soliciting, or engaging in prostitution; corrupting minors (sexual relations with children); molesting; voyeurism; committing sex acts in public; incest; rape; sexual assault; sexual battery; or sexual abuse; but excluding sodomy between consenting adults; 8. Child abuse or cruelty to children; or 9. Unlawful distribution or possession of or possession with intent to distribute, a controlled substance. Condition: We sampled 60 payroll expense transactions and noted the following: • Four (4) instances in which time charged to this program was not recorded in the timesheets reviewed for the periods tested. The total of these transactions were $12,087. • Six (6) payroll transactions did not satisfy the prohibited felony background requirements as specified in the Safe Passage Safe Block grant agreement for personnel hired under this award. The total of these transactions were $16,404. • Six (6) payroll transactions from the Safe Passage Safe Block award did not show evidence of clearance by the D.C. Child and Family Services Child Protection Registry (CPR) and 2 CPRs provided were outside of the period tested. In addition, 5 CPR and First Aid training documentation were not provided. The total of these transactions were $15,585. Two (2) files did not show evidence of Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) criminal background checks as a condition for employment. Eight (8) MPD files requested were not provided. The total of these transactions were $39,102. Twenty-two (22) National Sex Offenders Registry records were not provided for persons hired under the program. This registry was managed directly by a District Agency and was not submitted to CSC. The total of these transactions were $71,408. Questioned Costs: $154,586 Context: This is a condition identified per review of CSC’s compliance with the specified requirements using a statistically valid sample. The known amount of the payroll transactions totaled $154,586. Effect: CSC is not in compliance with the stated provisions of the grant awards. Failure to properly review and support expenses can result in noncompliance with laws and regulations along with loss of funding. Cause: CSC did not appear to have adequate policies and procedures in place to ensure compliance with the required stipulations regarding background. Recommendation: We recommend that CSC ensure that personnel hired under the grant meet all the background and other checks within the stipulated time frame outlined in the grant agreement. We also recommend that CSC improve internal controls to ensure adherence to Federal regulations related to the fiscal and administrative requirements for expending and accounting for expenses incurred and reported.
Prior Year Finding Number: 2022-002 Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Program: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund (CSLFRF) Pass through Entity: District of Columbia Office of the Deputy Mayor for Education -Office of Out of School Times Grant and Youth Outcomes, District of Columbia Human Services Rehousing Stabilization Program - Safe Passage Safe Blocks, D.C. Office of the Deputy Mayor Office Victim Services and Justice Grants and Office of Victim Services and Justice Grants Successful Reentry Program CFDA #: 21.027 Award #: 2023-SPSB-011-CSC, 2023-CSC-04, CW1010626, and 2023-AARPA-2004 Award Year: 10/01/2022-09/30/2023! Criteria: The Uniform Guidance in 2 CFR Section 200.303, Internal Controls, requires that non-federal entities receiving Federal awards (i.e., auditee management) establish and maintain internal control designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. In addition, 2 CFR 200.430 – Factors Affecting Allowability of Costs - Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. (c) Be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally financed and other activities of the non-Federal entity. (d) Be accorded consistent treatment. A cost may not be assigned to a federal award as a direct cost if any other incurred for the same purpose in like circumstances has been allocated to the Federal award as an indirect cost. (e) Be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), except, for state and local governments and Indian tribes only, as otherwise provided for in this part. (f) Not included as a cost or used to meet cost sharing or matching requirements of any other federally financed program in either the current or a prior period. (g) Be adequately documented. (h) Cost must be incurred during the approved budget period. The Federal awarding agency is authorized, at its discretion, to waive prior written approvals to carry forward unobligated balances to subsequent budget periods pursuant to §200.308(e)(3). The Personnel Section of the Executed Contract indicated specifies that: A. All staff, volunteers, and contractors, collectively called program personnel, who have regular unsupervised contact and direct interactions with youth, must possess the requisite training, qualifications, clearances, and competency to perform the duties to which they are assigned. B. All program personnel must have the following background checks in order to comply with the District of Columbia’s Criminal Background Checks for the Protection of Children Act of 2004. DC Code §§ 4-1501.01 – 4-1501.11 and other OST Office requirements: • DC Child and Family Services Agency (CFSA) Child Protection Registry (CPR); • Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Criminal Background Check; • Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) Criminal Background Check; and • National Sex Offender Registry. C. Any program personnel with the following felony convictions are not permitted to work or volunteer with children and youth: 1. Murder, attempted murder, manslaughter or arson; 2. Assault, battery, assault and battery, assault with a dangerous weapon, mayhem, or threats to do bodily harm; 3. Burglary; 4. Robbery; 5. Kidnapping; 6. Illegal use or possession of a firearm; 7. Sexual offenses, including indecent exposure; promoting, procuring, compelling, soliciting, or engaging in prostitution; corrupting minors (sexual relations with children); molesting; voyeurism; committing sex acts in public; incest; rape; sexual assault; sexual battery; or sexual abuse; but excluding sodomy between consenting adults; 8. Child abuse or cruelty to children; or 9. Unlawful distribution or possession of or possession with intent to distribute, a controlled substance. Condition: We sampled 60 payroll expense transactions and noted the following: • Four (4) instances in which time charged to this program was not recorded in the timesheets reviewed for the periods tested. The total of these transactions were $12,087. • Six (6) payroll transactions did not satisfy the prohibited felony background requirements as specified in the Safe Passage Safe Block grant agreement for personnel hired under this award. The total of these transactions were $16,404. • Six (6) payroll transactions from the Safe Passage Safe Block award did not show evidence of clearance by the D.C. Child and Family Services Child Protection Registry (CPR) and 2 CPRs provided were outside of the period tested. In addition, 5 CPR and First Aid training documentation were not provided. The total of these transactions were $15,585. Two (2) files did not show evidence of Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) criminal background checks as a condition for employment. Eight (8) MPD files requested were not provided. The total of these transactions were $39,102. Twenty-two (22) National Sex Offenders Registry records were not provided for persons hired under the program. This registry was managed directly by a District Agency and was not submitted to CSC. The total of these transactions were $71,408. Questioned Costs: $154,586 Context: This is a condition identified per review of CSC’s compliance with the specified requirements using a statistically valid sample. The known amount of the payroll transactions totaled $154,586. Effect: CSC is not in compliance with the stated provisions of the grant awards. Failure to properly review and support expenses can result in noncompliance with laws and regulations along with loss of funding. Cause: CSC did not appear to have adequate policies and procedures in place to ensure compliance with the required stipulations regarding background. Recommendation: We recommend that CSC ensure that personnel hired under the grant meet all the background and other checks within the stipulated time frame outlined in the grant agreement. We also recommend that CSC improve internal controls to ensure adherence to Federal regulations related to the fiscal and administrative requirements for expending and accounting for expenses incurred and reported.
Prior Year Finding Number: 2022-002 Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Program: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund (CSLFRF) Pass through Entity: District of Columbia Office of the Deputy Mayor for Education -Office of Out of School Times Grant and Youth Outcomes, District of Columbia Human Services Rehousing Stabilization Program - Safe Passage Safe Blocks, D.C. Office of the Deputy Mayor Office Victim Services and Justice Grants and Office of Victim Services and Justice Grants Successful Reentry Program CFDA #: 21.027 Award #: 2023-SPSB-011-CSC, 2023-CSC-04, CW1010626, and 2023-AARPA-2004 Award Year: 10/01/2022-09/30/2023! Criteria: The Uniform Guidance in 2 CFR Section 200.303, Internal Controls, requires that non-federal entities receiving Federal awards (i.e., auditee management) establish and maintain internal control designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. In addition, 2 CFR 200.430 – Factors Affecting Allowability of Costs - Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. (c) Be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally financed and other activities of the non-Federal entity. (d) Be accorded consistent treatment. A cost may not be assigned to a federal award as a direct cost if any other incurred for the same purpose in like circumstances has been allocated to the Federal award as an indirect cost. (e) Be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), except, for state and local governments and Indian tribes only, as otherwise provided for in this part. (f) Not included as a cost or used to meet cost sharing or matching requirements of any other federally financed program in either the current or a prior period. (g) Be adequately documented. (h) Cost must be incurred during the approved budget period. The Federal awarding agency is authorized, at its discretion, to waive prior written approvals to carry forward unobligated balances to subsequent budget periods pursuant to §200.308(e)(3). The Personnel Section of the Executed Contract indicated specifies that: A. All staff, volunteers, and contractors, collectively called program personnel, who have regular unsupervised contact and direct interactions with youth, must possess the requisite training, qualifications, clearances, and competency to perform the duties to which they are assigned. B. All program personnel must have the following background checks in order to comply with the District of Columbia’s Criminal Background Checks for the Protection of Children Act of 2004. DC Code §§ 4-1501.01 – 4-1501.11 and other OST Office requirements: • DC Child and Family Services Agency (CFSA) Child Protection Registry (CPR); • Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Criminal Background Check; • Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) Criminal Background Check; and • National Sex Offender Registry. C. Any program personnel with the following felony convictions are not permitted to work or volunteer with children and youth: 1. Murder, attempted murder, manslaughter or arson; 2. Assault, battery, assault and battery, assault with a dangerous weapon, mayhem, or threats to do bodily harm; 3. Burglary; 4. Robbery; 5. Kidnapping; 6. Illegal use or possession of a firearm; 7. Sexual offenses, including indecent exposure; promoting, procuring, compelling, soliciting, or engaging in prostitution; corrupting minors (sexual relations with children); molesting; voyeurism; committing sex acts in public; incest; rape; sexual assault; sexual battery; or sexual abuse; but excluding sodomy between consenting adults; 8. Child abuse or cruelty to children; or 9. Unlawful distribution or possession of or possession with intent to distribute, a controlled substance. Condition: We sampled 60 payroll expense transactions and noted the following: • Four (4) instances in which time charged to this program was not recorded in the timesheets reviewed for the periods tested. The total of these transactions were $12,087. • Six (6) payroll transactions did not satisfy the prohibited felony background requirements as specified in the Safe Passage Safe Block grant agreement for personnel hired under this award. The total of these transactions were $16,404. • Six (6) payroll transactions from the Safe Passage Safe Block award did not show evidence of clearance by the D.C. Child and Family Services Child Protection Registry (CPR) and 2 CPRs provided were outside of the period tested. In addition, 5 CPR and First Aid training documentation were not provided. The total of these transactions were $15,585. Two (2) files did not show evidence of Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) criminal background checks as a condition for employment. Eight (8) MPD files requested were not provided. The total of these transactions were $39,102. Twenty-two (22) National Sex Offenders Registry records were not provided for persons hired under the program. This registry was managed directly by a District Agency and was not submitted to CSC. The total of these transactions were $71,408. Questioned Costs: $154,586 Context: This is a condition identified per review of CSC’s compliance with the specified requirements using a statistically valid sample. The known amount of the payroll transactions totaled $154,586. Effect: CSC is not in compliance with the stated provisions of the grant awards. Failure to properly review and support expenses can result in noncompliance with laws and regulations along with loss of funding. Cause: CSC did not appear to have adequate policies and procedures in place to ensure compliance with the required stipulations regarding background. Recommendation: We recommend that CSC ensure that personnel hired under the grant meet all the background and other checks within the stipulated time frame outlined in the grant agreement. We also recommend that CSC improve internal controls to ensure adherence to Federal regulations related to the fiscal and administrative requirements for expending and accounting for expenses incurred and reported.
Prior Year Finding Number: 2022-002 Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Program: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund (CSLFRF) Pass through Entity: District of Columbia Office of the Deputy Mayor for Education -Office of Out of School Times Grant and Youth Outcomes, District of Columbia Human Services Rehousing Stabilization Program - Safe Passage Safe Blocks, D.C. Office of the Deputy Mayor Office Victim Services and Justice Grants and Office of Victim Services and Justice Grants Successful Reentry Program CFDA #: 21.027 Award #: 2023-SPSB-011-CSC, 2023-CSC-04, CW1010626, and 2023-AARPA-2004 Award Year: 10/01/2022-09/30/2023! Criteria: The Uniform Guidance in 2 CFR Section 200.303, Internal Controls, requires that non-federal entities receiving Federal awards (i.e., auditee management) establish and maintain internal control designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. In addition, 2 CFR 200.430 – Factors Affecting Allowability of Costs - Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. (c) Be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally financed and other activities of the non-Federal entity. (d) Be accorded consistent treatment. A cost may not be assigned to a federal award as a direct cost if any other incurred for the same purpose in like circumstances has been allocated to the Federal award as an indirect cost. (e) Be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), except, for state and local governments and Indian tribes only, as otherwise provided for in this part. (f) Not included as a cost or used to meet cost sharing or matching requirements of any other federally financed program in either the current or a prior period. (g) Be adequately documented. (h) Cost must be incurred during the approved budget period. The Federal awarding agency is authorized, at its discretion, to waive prior written approvals to carry forward unobligated balances to subsequent budget periods pursuant to §200.308(e)(3). The Personnel Section of the Executed Contract indicated specifies that: A. All staff, volunteers, and contractors, collectively called program personnel, who have regular unsupervised contact and direct interactions with youth, must possess the requisite training, qualifications, clearances, and competency to perform the duties to which they are assigned. B. All program personnel must have the following background checks in order to comply with the District of Columbia’s Criminal Background Checks for the Protection of Children Act of 2004. DC Code §§ 4-1501.01 – 4-1501.11 and other OST Office requirements: • DC Child and Family Services Agency (CFSA) Child Protection Registry (CPR); • Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Criminal Background Check; • Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) Criminal Background Check; and • National Sex Offender Registry. C. Any program personnel with the following felony convictions are not permitted to work or volunteer with children and youth: 1. Murder, attempted murder, manslaughter or arson; 2. Assault, battery, assault and battery, assault with a dangerous weapon, mayhem, or threats to do bodily harm; 3. Burglary; 4. Robbery; 5. Kidnapping; 6. Illegal use or possession of a firearm; 7. Sexual offenses, including indecent exposure; promoting, procuring, compelling, soliciting, or engaging in prostitution; corrupting minors (sexual relations with children); molesting; voyeurism; committing sex acts in public; incest; rape; sexual assault; sexual battery; or sexual abuse; but excluding sodomy between consenting adults; 8. Child abuse or cruelty to children; or 9. Unlawful distribution or possession of or possession with intent to distribute, a controlled substance. Condition: We sampled 60 payroll expense transactions and noted the following: • Four (4) instances in which time charged to this program was not recorded in the timesheets reviewed for the periods tested. The total of these transactions were $12,087. • Six (6) payroll transactions did not satisfy the prohibited felony background requirements as specified in the Safe Passage Safe Block grant agreement for personnel hired under this award. The total of these transactions were $16,404. • Six (6) payroll transactions from the Safe Passage Safe Block award did not show evidence of clearance by the D.C. Child and Family Services Child Protection Registry (CPR) and 2 CPRs provided were outside of the period tested. In addition, 5 CPR and First Aid training documentation were not provided. The total of these transactions were $15,585. Two (2) files did not show evidence of Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) criminal background checks as a condition for employment. Eight (8) MPD files requested were not provided. The total of these transactions were $39,102. Twenty-two (22) National Sex Offenders Registry records were not provided for persons hired under the program. This registry was managed directly by a District Agency and was not submitted to CSC. The total of these transactions were $71,408. Questioned Costs: $154,586 Context: This is a condition identified per review of CSC’s compliance with the specified requirements using a statistically valid sample. The known amount of the payroll transactions totaled $154,586. Effect: CSC is not in compliance with the stated provisions of the grant awards. Failure to properly review and support expenses can result in noncompliance with laws and regulations along with loss of funding. Cause: CSC did not appear to have adequate policies and procedures in place to ensure compliance with the required stipulations regarding background. Recommendation: We recommend that CSC ensure that personnel hired under the grant meet all the background and other checks within the stipulated time frame outlined in the grant agreement. We also recommend that CSC improve internal controls to ensure adherence to Federal regulations related to the fiscal and administrative requirements for expending and accounting for expenses incurred and reported.
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES 2023-004 Immunization Cooperative Agreements, ALN #93.268 Criteria: According to 2 CFR Section 200.308, all budget revisions over 10% must receive a budget revision from the grantee. Condition: Following a budget revision of over 10%, an approval was not received from the grantee. Cause: At direction from the pass-through agency, the Organization charged salary expenses to the contract services line items on its request reimbursement instead of getting budget revisions to reflect the change in the work performed. Effect: The costs billed on the vouchers for reimbursement, did not match the natural classification of the actual expenses incurred on the grant resulting in expenses reported being over budget on certain line items and under budget on others. Auditor recommendation: We recommend that when there is a budget revision over 10%, the Organization works with the grantor to get formal documentation to support the revision to ensure amounts charged to the grants are in line with budget line items. Management response: Management will ensure a budget revision be done for any increase over 10% and submit that to the grantor to receive formal approval from the grantor.
Prior Year Finding Number: 2022-002 Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Program: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund (CSLFRF) Pass through Entity: District of Columbia Office of the Deputy Mayor for Education -Office of Out of School Times Grant and Youth Outcomes, District of Columbia Human Services Rehousing Stabilization Program - Safe Passage Safe Blocks, D.C. Office of the Deputy Mayor Office Victim Services and Justice Grants and Office of Victim Services and Justice Grants Successful Reentry Program CFDA #: 21.027 Award #: 2023-SPSB-011-CSC, 2023-CSC-04, CW1010626, and 2023-AARPA-2004 Award Year: 10/01/2022-09/30/2023! Criteria: The Uniform Guidance in 2 CFR Section 200.303, Internal Controls, requires that non-federal entities receiving Federal awards (i.e., auditee management) establish and maintain internal control designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. In addition, 2 CFR 200.430 – Factors Affecting Allowability of Costs - Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. (c) Be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally financed and other activities of the non-Federal entity. (d) Be accorded consistent treatment. A cost may not be assigned to a federal award as a direct cost if any other incurred for the same purpose in like circumstances has been allocated to the Federal award as an indirect cost. (e) Be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), except, for state and local governments and Indian tribes only, as otherwise provided for in this part. (f) Not included as a cost or used to meet cost sharing or matching requirements of any other federally financed program in either the current or a prior period. (g) Be adequately documented. (h) Cost must be incurred during the approved budget period. The Federal awarding agency is authorized, at its discretion, to waive prior written approvals to carry forward unobligated balances to subsequent budget periods pursuant to §200.308(e)(3). The Personnel Section of the Executed Contract indicated specifies that: A. All staff, volunteers, and contractors, collectively called program personnel, who have regular unsupervised contact and direct interactions with youth, must possess the requisite training, qualifications, clearances, and competency to perform the duties to which they are assigned. B. All program personnel must have the following background checks in order to comply with the District of Columbia’s Criminal Background Checks for the Protection of Children Act of 2004. DC Code §§ 4-1501.01 – 4-1501.11 and other OST Office requirements: • DC Child and Family Services Agency (CFSA) Child Protection Registry (CPR); • Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Criminal Background Check; • Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) Criminal Background Check; and • National Sex Offender Registry. C. Any program personnel with the following felony convictions are not permitted to work or volunteer with children and youth: 1. Murder, attempted murder, manslaughter or arson; 2. Assault, battery, assault and battery, assault with a dangerous weapon, mayhem, or threats to do bodily harm; 3. Burglary; 4. Robbery; 5. Kidnapping; 6. Illegal use or possession of a firearm; 7. Sexual offenses, including indecent exposure; promoting, procuring, compelling, soliciting, or engaging in prostitution; corrupting minors (sexual relations with children); molesting; voyeurism; committing sex acts in public; incest; rape; sexual assault; sexual battery; or sexual abuse; but excluding sodomy between consenting adults; 8. Child abuse or cruelty to children; or 9. Unlawful distribution or possession of or possession with intent to distribute, a controlled substance. Condition: We sampled 60 payroll expense transactions and noted the following: • Four (4) instances in which time charged to this program was not recorded in the timesheets reviewed for the periods tested. The total of these transactions were $12,087. • Six (6) payroll transactions did not satisfy the prohibited felony background requirements as specified in the Safe Passage Safe Block grant agreement for personnel hired under this award. The total of these transactions were $16,404. • Six (6) payroll transactions from the Safe Passage Safe Block award did not show evidence of clearance by the D.C. Child and Family Services Child Protection Registry (CPR) and 2 CPRs provided were outside of the period tested. In addition, 5 CPR and First Aid training documentation were not provided. The total of these transactions were $15,585. Two (2) files did not show evidence of Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) criminal background checks as a condition for employment. Eight (8) MPD files requested were not provided. The total of these transactions were $39,102. Twenty-two (22) National Sex Offenders Registry records were not provided for persons hired under the program. This registry was managed directly by a District Agency and was not submitted to CSC. The total of these transactions were $71,408. Questioned Costs: $154,586 Context: This is a condition identified per review of CSC’s compliance with the specified requirements using a statistically valid sample. The known amount of the payroll transactions totaled $154,586. Effect: CSC is not in compliance with the stated provisions of the grant awards. Failure to properly review and support expenses can result in noncompliance with laws and regulations along with loss of funding. Cause: CSC did not appear to have adequate policies and procedures in place to ensure compliance with the required stipulations regarding background. Recommendation: We recommend that CSC ensure that personnel hired under the grant meet all the background and other checks within the stipulated time frame outlined in the grant agreement. We also recommend that CSC improve internal controls to ensure adherence to Federal regulations related to the fiscal and administrative requirements for expending and accounting for expenses incurred and reported.
Prior Year Finding Number: 2022-002 Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Program: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund (CSLFRF) Pass through Entity: District of Columbia Office of the Deputy Mayor for Education -Office of Out of School Times Grant and Youth Outcomes, District of Columbia Human Services Rehousing Stabilization Program - Safe Passage Safe Blocks, D.C. Office of the Deputy Mayor Office Victim Services and Justice Grants and Office of Victim Services and Justice Grants Successful Reentry Program CFDA #: 21.027 Award #: 2023-SPSB-011-CSC, 2023-CSC-04, CW1010626, and 2023-AARPA-2004 Award Year: 10/01/2022-09/30/2023! Criteria: The Uniform Guidance in 2 CFR Section 200.303, Internal Controls, requires that non-federal entities receiving Federal awards (i.e., auditee management) establish and maintain internal control designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. In addition, 2 CFR 200.430 – Factors Affecting Allowability of Costs - Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. (c) Be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally financed and other activities of the non-Federal entity. (d) Be accorded consistent treatment. A cost may not be assigned to a federal award as a direct cost if any other incurred for the same purpose in like circumstances has been allocated to the Federal award as an indirect cost. (e) Be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), except, for state and local governments and Indian tribes only, as otherwise provided for in this part. (f) Not included as a cost or used to meet cost sharing or matching requirements of any other federally financed program in either the current or a prior period. (g) Be adequately documented. (h) Cost must be incurred during the approved budget period. The Federal awarding agency is authorized, at its discretion, to waive prior written approvals to carry forward unobligated balances to subsequent budget periods pursuant to §200.308(e)(3). The Personnel Section of the Executed Contract indicated specifies that: A. All staff, volunteers, and contractors, collectively called program personnel, who have regular unsupervised contact and direct interactions with youth, must possess the requisite training, qualifications, clearances, and competency to perform the duties to which they are assigned. B. All program personnel must have the following background checks in order to comply with the District of Columbia’s Criminal Background Checks for the Protection of Children Act of 2004. DC Code §§ 4-1501.01 – 4-1501.11 and other OST Office requirements: • DC Child and Family Services Agency (CFSA) Child Protection Registry (CPR); • Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Criminal Background Check; • Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) Criminal Background Check; and • National Sex Offender Registry. C. Any program personnel with the following felony convictions are not permitted to work or volunteer with children and youth: 1. Murder, attempted murder, manslaughter or arson; 2. Assault, battery, assault and battery, assault with a dangerous weapon, mayhem, or threats to do bodily harm; 3. Burglary; 4. Robbery; 5. Kidnapping; 6. Illegal use or possession of a firearm; 7. Sexual offenses, including indecent exposure; promoting, procuring, compelling, soliciting, or engaging in prostitution; corrupting minors (sexual relations with children); molesting; voyeurism; committing sex acts in public; incest; rape; sexual assault; sexual battery; or sexual abuse; but excluding sodomy between consenting adults; 8. Child abuse or cruelty to children; or 9. Unlawful distribution or possession of or possession with intent to distribute, a controlled substance. Condition: We sampled 60 payroll expense transactions and noted the following: • Four (4) instances in which time charged to this program was not recorded in the timesheets reviewed for the periods tested. The total of these transactions were $12,087. • Six (6) payroll transactions did not satisfy the prohibited felony background requirements as specified in the Safe Passage Safe Block grant agreement for personnel hired under this award. The total of these transactions were $16,404. • Six (6) payroll transactions from the Safe Passage Safe Block award did not show evidence of clearance by the D.C. Child and Family Services Child Protection Registry (CPR) and 2 CPRs provided were outside of the period tested. In addition, 5 CPR and First Aid training documentation were not provided. The total of these transactions were $15,585. Two (2) files did not show evidence of Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) criminal background checks as a condition for employment. Eight (8) MPD files requested were not provided. The total of these transactions were $39,102. Twenty-two (22) National Sex Offenders Registry records were not provided for persons hired under the program. This registry was managed directly by a District Agency and was not submitted to CSC. The total of these transactions were $71,408. Questioned Costs: $154,586 Context: This is a condition identified per review of CSC’s compliance with the specified requirements using a statistically valid sample. The known amount of the payroll transactions totaled $154,586. Effect: CSC is not in compliance with the stated provisions of the grant awards. Failure to properly review and support expenses can result in noncompliance with laws and regulations along with loss of funding. Cause: CSC did not appear to have adequate policies and procedures in place to ensure compliance with the required stipulations regarding background. Recommendation: We recommend that CSC ensure that personnel hired under the grant meet all the background and other checks within the stipulated time frame outlined in the grant agreement. We also recommend that CSC improve internal controls to ensure adherence to Federal regulations related to the fiscal and administrative requirements for expending and accounting for expenses incurred and reported.
Prior Year Finding Number: 2022-002 Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Program: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund (CSLFRF) Pass through Entity: District of Columbia Office of the Deputy Mayor for Education -Office of Out of School Times Grant and Youth Outcomes, District of Columbia Human Services Rehousing Stabilization Program - Safe Passage Safe Blocks, D.C. Office of the Deputy Mayor Office Victim Services and Justice Grants and Office of Victim Services and Justice Grants Successful Reentry Program CFDA #: 21.027 Award #: 2023-SPSB-011-CSC, 2023-CSC-04, CW1010626, and 2023-AARPA-2004 Award Year: 10/01/2022-09/30/2023! Criteria: The Uniform Guidance in 2 CFR Section 200.303, Internal Controls, requires that non-federal entities receiving Federal awards (i.e., auditee management) establish and maintain internal control designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. In addition, 2 CFR 200.430 – Factors Affecting Allowability of Costs - Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. (c) Be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally financed and other activities of the non-Federal entity. (d) Be accorded consistent treatment. A cost may not be assigned to a federal award as a direct cost if any other incurred for the same purpose in like circumstances has been allocated to the Federal award as an indirect cost. (e) Be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), except, for state and local governments and Indian tribes only, as otherwise provided for in this part. (f) Not included as a cost or used to meet cost sharing or matching requirements of any other federally financed program in either the current or a prior period. (g) Be adequately documented. (h) Cost must be incurred during the approved budget period. The Federal awarding agency is authorized, at its discretion, to waive prior written approvals to carry forward unobligated balances to subsequent budget periods pursuant to §200.308(e)(3). The Personnel Section of the Executed Contract indicated specifies that: A. All staff, volunteers, and contractors, collectively called program personnel, who have regular unsupervised contact and direct interactions with youth, must possess the requisite training, qualifications, clearances, and competency to perform the duties to which they are assigned. B. All program personnel must have the following background checks in order to comply with the District of Columbia’s Criminal Background Checks for the Protection of Children Act of 2004. DC Code §§ 4-1501.01 – 4-1501.11 and other OST Office requirements: • DC Child and Family Services Agency (CFSA) Child Protection Registry (CPR); • Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Criminal Background Check; • Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) Criminal Background Check; and • National Sex Offender Registry. C. Any program personnel with the following felony convictions are not permitted to work or volunteer with children and youth: 1. Murder, attempted murder, manslaughter or arson; 2. Assault, battery, assault and battery, assault with a dangerous weapon, mayhem, or threats to do bodily harm; 3. Burglary; 4. Robbery; 5. Kidnapping; 6. Illegal use or possession of a firearm; 7. Sexual offenses, including indecent exposure; promoting, procuring, compelling, soliciting, or engaging in prostitution; corrupting minors (sexual relations with children); molesting; voyeurism; committing sex acts in public; incest; rape; sexual assault; sexual battery; or sexual abuse; but excluding sodomy between consenting adults; 8. Child abuse or cruelty to children; or 9. Unlawful distribution or possession of or possession with intent to distribute, a controlled substance. Condition: We sampled 60 payroll expense transactions and noted the following: • Four (4) instances in which time charged to this program was not recorded in the timesheets reviewed for the periods tested. The total of these transactions were $12,087. • Six (6) payroll transactions did not satisfy the prohibited felony background requirements as specified in the Safe Passage Safe Block grant agreement for personnel hired under this award. The total of these transactions were $16,404. • Six (6) payroll transactions from the Safe Passage Safe Block award did not show evidence of clearance by the D.C. Child and Family Services Child Protection Registry (CPR) and 2 CPRs provided were outside of the period tested. In addition, 5 CPR and First Aid training documentation were not provided. The total of these transactions were $15,585. Two (2) files did not show evidence of Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) criminal background checks as a condition for employment. Eight (8) MPD files requested were not provided. The total of these transactions were $39,102. Twenty-two (22) National Sex Offenders Registry records were not provided for persons hired under the program. This registry was managed directly by a District Agency and was not submitted to CSC. The total of these transactions were $71,408. Questioned Costs: $154,586 Context: This is a condition identified per review of CSC’s compliance with the specified requirements using a statistically valid sample. The known amount of the payroll transactions totaled $154,586. Effect: CSC is not in compliance with the stated provisions of the grant awards. Failure to properly review and support expenses can result in noncompliance with laws and regulations along with loss of funding. Cause: CSC did not appear to have adequate policies and procedures in place to ensure compliance with the required stipulations regarding background. Recommendation: We recommend that CSC ensure that personnel hired under the grant meet all the background and other checks within the stipulated time frame outlined in the grant agreement. We also recommend that CSC improve internal controls to ensure adherence to Federal regulations related to the fiscal and administrative requirements for expending and accounting for expenses incurred and reported.
Prior Year Finding Number: 2022-002 Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Program: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund (CSLFRF) Pass through Entity: District of Columbia Office of the Deputy Mayor for Education -Office of Out of School Times Grant and Youth Outcomes, District of Columbia Human Services Rehousing Stabilization Program - Safe Passage Safe Blocks, D.C. Office of the Deputy Mayor Office Victim Services and Justice Grants and Office of Victim Services and Justice Grants Successful Reentry Program CFDA #: 21.027 Award #: 2023-SPSB-011-CSC, 2023-CSC-04, CW1010626, and 2023-AARPA-2004 Award Year: 10/01/2022-09/30/2023! Criteria: The Uniform Guidance in 2 CFR Section 200.303, Internal Controls, requires that non-federal entities receiving Federal awards (i.e., auditee management) establish and maintain internal control designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. In addition, 2 CFR 200.430 – Factors Affecting Allowability of Costs - Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. (c) Be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally financed and other activities of the non-Federal entity. (d) Be accorded consistent treatment. A cost may not be assigned to a federal award as a direct cost if any other incurred for the same purpose in like circumstances has been allocated to the Federal award as an indirect cost. (e) Be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), except, for state and local governments and Indian tribes only, as otherwise provided for in this part. (f) Not included as a cost or used to meet cost sharing or matching requirements of any other federally financed program in either the current or a prior period. (g) Be adequately documented. (h) Cost must be incurred during the approved budget period. The Federal awarding agency is authorized, at its discretion, to waive prior written approvals to carry forward unobligated balances to subsequent budget periods pursuant to §200.308(e)(3). The Personnel Section of the Executed Contract indicated specifies that: A. All staff, volunteers, and contractors, collectively called program personnel, who have regular unsupervised contact and direct interactions with youth, must possess the requisite training, qualifications, clearances, and competency to perform the duties to which they are assigned. B. All program personnel must have the following background checks in order to comply with the District of Columbia’s Criminal Background Checks for the Protection of Children Act of 2004. DC Code §§ 4-1501.01 – 4-1501.11 and other OST Office requirements: • DC Child and Family Services Agency (CFSA) Child Protection Registry (CPR); • Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Criminal Background Check; • Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) Criminal Background Check; and • National Sex Offender Registry. C. Any program personnel with the following felony convictions are not permitted to work or volunteer with children and youth: 1. Murder, attempted murder, manslaughter or arson; 2. Assault, battery, assault and battery, assault with a dangerous weapon, mayhem, or threats to do bodily harm; 3. Burglary; 4. Robbery; 5. Kidnapping; 6. Illegal use or possession of a firearm; 7. Sexual offenses, including indecent exposure; promoting, procuring, compelling, soliciting, or engaging in prostitution; corrupting minors (sexual relations with children); molesting; voyeurism; committing sex acts in public; incest; rape; sexual assault; sexual battery; or sexual abuse; but excluding sodomy between consenting adults; 8. Child abuse or cruelty to children; or 9. Unlawful distribution or possession of or possession with intent to distribute, a controlled substance. Condition: We sampled 60 payroll expense transactions and noted the following: • Four (4) instances in which time charged to this program was not recorded in the timesheets reviewed for the periods tested. The total of these transactions were $12,087. • Six (6) payroll transactions did not satisfy the prohibited felony background requirements as specified in the Safe Passage Safe Block grant agreement for personnel hired under this award. The total of these transactions were $16,404. • Six (6) payroll transactions from the Safe Passage Safe Block award did not show evidence of clearance by the D.C. Child and Family Services Child Protection Registry (CPR) and 2 CPRs provided were outside of the period tested. In addition, 5 CPR and First Aid training documentation were not provided. The total of these transactions were $15,585. Two (2) files did not show evidence of Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) criminal background checks as a condition for employment. Eight (8) MPD files requested were not provided. The total of these transactions were $39,102. Twenty-two (22) National Sex Offenders Registry records were not provided for persons hired under the program. This registry was managed directly by a District Agency and was not submitted to CSC. The total of these transactions were $71,408. Questioned Costs: $154,586 Context: This is a condition identified per review of CSC’s compliance with the specified requirements using a statistically valid sample. The known amount of the payroll transactions totaled $154,586. Effect: CSC is not in compliance with the stated provisions of the grant awards. Failure to properly review and support expenses can result in noncompliance with laws and regulations along with loss of funding. Cause: CSC did not appear to have adequate policies and procedures in place to ensure compliance with the required stipulations regarding background. Recommendation: We recommend that CSC ensure that personnel hired under the grant meet all the background and other checks within the stipulated time frame outlined in the grant agreement. We also recommend that CSC improve internal controls to ensure adherence to Federal regulations related to the fiscal and administrative requirements for expending and accounting for expenses incurred and reported.
Prior Year Finding Number: 2022-002 Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Program: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund (CSLFRF) Pass through Entity: District of Columbia Office of the Deputy Mayor for Education -Office of Out of School Times Grant and Youth Outcomes, District of Columbia Human Services Rehousing Stabilization Program - Safe Passage Safe Blocks, D.C. Office of the Deputy Mayor Office Victim Services and Justice Grants and Office of Victim Services and Justice Grants Successful Reentry Program CFDA #: 21.027 Award #: 2023-SPSB-011-CSC, 2023-CSC-04, CW1010626, and 2023-AARPA-2004 Award Year: 10/01/2022-09/30/2023! Criteria: The Uniform Guidance in 2 CFR Section 200.303, Internal Controls, requires that non-federal entities receiving Federal awards (i.e., auditee management) establish and maintain internal control designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. In addition, 2 CFR 200.430 – Factors Affecting Allowability of Costs - Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. (c) Be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally financed and other activities of the non-Federal entity. (d) Be accorded consistent treatment. A cost may not be assigned to a federal award as a direct cost if any other incurred for the same purpose in like circumstances has been allocated to the Federal award as an indirect cost. (e) Be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), except, for state and local governments and Indian tribes only, as otherwise provided for in this part. (f) Not included as a cost or used to meet cost sharing or matching requirements of any other federally financed program in either the current or a prior period. (g) Be adequately documented. (h) Cost must be incurred during the approved budget period. The Federal awarding agency is authorized, at its discretion, to waive prior written approvals to carry forward unobligated balances to subsequent budget periods pursuant to §200.308(e)(3). The Personnel Section of the Executed Contract indicated specifies that: A. All staff, volunteers, and contractors, collectively called program personnel, who have regular unsupervised contact and direct interactions with youth, must possess the requisite training, qualifications, clearances, and competency to perform the duties to which they are assigned. B. All program personnel must have the following background checks in order to comply with the District of Columbia’s Criminal Background Checks for the Protection of Children Act of 2004. DC Code §§ 4-1501.01 – 4-1501.11 and other OST Office requirements: • DC Child and Family Services Agency (CFSA) Child Protection Registry (CPR); • Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Criminal Background Check; • Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) Criminal Background Check; and • National Sex Offender Registry. C. Any program personnel with the following felony convictions are not permitted to work or volunteer with children and youth: 1. Murder, attempted murder, manslaughter or arson; 2. Assault, battery, assault and battery, assault with a dangerous weapon, mayhem, or threats to do bodily harm; 3. Burglary; 4. Robbery; 5. Kidnapping; 6. Illegal use or possession of a firearm; 7. Sexual offenses, including indecent exposure; promoting, procuring, compelling, soliciting, or engaging in prostitution; corrupting minors (sexual relations with children); molesting; voyeurism; committing sex acts in public; incest; rape; sexual assault; sexual battery; or sexual abuse; but excluding sodomy between consenting adults; 8. Child abuse or cruelty to children; or 9. Unlawful distribution or possession of or possession with intent to distribute, a controlled substance. Condition: We sampled 60 payroll expense transactions and noted the following: • Four (4) instances in which time charged to this program was not recorded in the timesheets reviewed for the periods tested. The total of these transactions were $12,087. • Six (6) payroll transactions did not satisfy the prohibited felony background requirements as specified in the Safe Passage Safe Block grant agreement for personnel hired under this award. The total of these transactions were $16,404. • Six (6) payroll transactions from the Safe Passage Safe Block award did not show evidence of clearance by the D.C. Child and Family Services Child Protection Registry (CPR) and 2 CPRs provided were outside of the period tested. In addition, 5 CPR and First Aid training documentation were not provided. The total of these transactions were $15,585. Two (2) files did not show evidence of Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) criminal background checks as a condition for employment. Eight (8) MPD files requested were not provided. The total of these transactions were $39,102. Twenty-two (22) National Sex Offenders Registry records were not provided for persons hired under the program. This registry was managed directly by a District Agency and was not submitted to CSC. The total of these transactions were $71,408. Questioned Costs: $154,586 Context: This is a condition identified per review of CSC’s compliance with the specified requirements using a statistically valid sample. The known amount of the payroll transactions totaled $154,586. Effect: CSC is not in compliance with the stated provisions of the grant awards. Failure to properly review and support expenses can result in noncompliance with laws and regulations along with loss of funding. Cause: CSC did not appear to have adequate policies and procedures in place to ensure compliance with the required stipulations regarding background. Recommendation: We recommend that CSC ensure that personnel hired under the grant meet all the background and other checks within the stipulated time frame outlined in the grant agreement. We also recommend that CSC improve internal controls to ensure adherence to Federal regulations related to the fiscal and administrative requirements for expending and accounting for expenses incurred and reported.
Finding Number: 2023-001 – Time Allocation and Budget Monitoring Federal Agencies: United States Department of State Federal Programs: All programs under Assistance Listing Number 19.345 Assistance Listing Numbers: 19.345 Award Identification Number and Year: All awards under Assistance Listing Number 19.345 Criteria or Specific Requirement: 1. Time and Effort Reporting: According to 2 CFR §200.430(i), charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must be supported by a system of internal controls that provide reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. 2. Budget Management: Per 2 CFR §200.308, recipients of Federal funds must monitor actual expenditures against the approved budget to ensure funds are used for allowable activities and to avoid over- or underspending. Condition: CIPE did not properly allocate employee time to Federal programs in accordance with actual time worked, resulting in inaccurate charges to Federal awards. Additionally, CIPE did not maintain adequate oversight of budget-to-actual expenditures, leading to potential mismanagement of Federal funds. Cause: 1. The misallocation of Federal funds was primarily due to a lack of adequate training for staff on time and effort requirements and failure to implement adequate tracking systems. 2. The Budget Oversight deficiency was due primarily to a lack of regular budget reviews, inadequate financial reporting processes, and turnover in key personnel. Effect or Potential Effect: 1. The misallocation of employee time increases the risk of unallowable costs being charged to Federal programs, which could result in questioned costs and potential repayment of funds. 2. Lack of oversight over budget-to-actual expenditures may lead to noncompliance with grant requirements, inefficient use of funds, or missed opportunities to reallocate resources effectively. Questioned Costs: None Context: This finding is considered systemic rather than isolated. The entity has not had prior findings related to time allocations or budget monitoring in recent years. Identification as a Repeat Finding, if Applicable: Not applicable Recommendation: We recommend that CIPE: 1. Establish and enforce a robust time and effort reporting system to ensure employee time is allocated accurately and in compliance with Federal regulations. Provide training to employees and supervisors on proper reporting requirements. 2. Implement regular budget-to-actual reviews to identify variances and take corrective actions promptly. Develop a formalized process for financial oversight that includes periodic reporting to management and grant administrators.
Finding No. 2023-041 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services AL Program: 93.575/93.596 CCDF Cluster COVID-19 93.575/93.596 CCDF Cluster Federal Award No.: 2101MPCCC5, 2101MPCCDF, 1901MPCCDD Area: Period of Performance Questioned Costs: $95,367 Criteria: A non-federal entity may charge only allowable costs incurred during the approved budget period of a federal award’s period of performance and any costs incurred before the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity made the federal award that were authorized by the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity (2 CFR sections 200.308 200.309 and 200.403(h)). The Program must liquidate all financial obligations incurred under the federal award not later than two years after the end date of the period of performance as specified in the terms and conditions of the federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.303(a), the recipient must establish, document, and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the recipient or subrecipient is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition: 1. CNMI does not have any documentation or evidence to provide support that transactions are being reviewed to ensure that they are incurred within the period of performance. This condition does not result in questioned costs as this is an internal control finding. 2. CNMI does not properly monitor whether expenditures are paid prior to the end of the liquidation period. This condition does not result in questioned costs as this is an internal control finding. 3. Of forty expenditures tested, aggregating $817,071 of a total population of $2,171,232, the following were noted: a. For four (or 10%), CNMI did not provide the purchase order or contract to support that expenditures were incurred within the period of performance end date of 09/30/23. Finding No. 2023-041, continued Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services AL Program: 93.575/93.596 CCDF Cluster COVID-19 93.575/93.596 CCDF Cluster Federal Award No.: 2101MPCCC5, 2101MPCCDF, 1901MPCCDD Area: Period of Performance Questioned Costs: $95,367 Condition, continued: b. For ten (or 25%), CNMI did not provide a breakdown of the batch payments identified in the bank statements to identify and trace the clearance dates of each transaction, to support that the expenditures were liquidated within the liquidation period end date of 09/30/25. Cause: 1. CNMI’s current policy and procedure does not include proper documentation of the review being performed to verify that the transactions are valid and still within the period of performance. Finding No. 2023-041, continued Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services AL Program: 93.575/93.596 CCDF Cluster COVID-19 93.575/93.596 CCDF Cluster Federal Award No.: 2101MPCCC5, 2101MPCCDF, 1901MPCCDD Area: Period of Performance Questioned Costs: $95,367 Cause, continued: 2. CNMI does not have any policies and procedures established to monitor and ensure that payments to vendors are liquidated within the end of the liquidation period. 3. CNMI did not provide sufficient and appropriate audit evidence to substantiate the expenditures over compliance with applicable period of performance compliance requirements. Effect or Potential Effect: CNMI is in noncompliance with applicable period of performance compliance requirements and questioned costs of $95,367 result. Identification as a Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: CNMI should strengthen and enforce compliance with period of performance compliance requirements over the following: 1. CNMI should update their current policies and procedures to ensure that part of the documentation of checking the allowability of each transaction includes the verification if the expenditures are still within the period of performance. This can be done by attaching the copy of the grant award, or a certification from the program administrator, or personnel in-charge of checking the allowability of each transaction, that the grant being charged is in compliance with the period of performance compliance requirements. Finding No. 2023-041, continued Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services AL Program: 93.575/93.596 CCDF Cluster COVID-19 93.575/93.596 CCDF Cluster Federal Award No.: 2101MPCCC5, 2101MPCCDF, 1901MPCCDD Area: Period of Performance Questioned Costs: $95,367 Recommendation, continued: 2. CNMI should establish monitoring procedures to ensure that checks issued to vendors are cleared by the banks within the liquidation period. The DOF Financial Services could establish a monitoring log for all checks issued for each vendor and each office. The assigned offices should then request a copy from the DOF Financial Services of the monitoring and conduct timely follow-up to each vendor on ensuring the checks are paid. Lastly, CNMI could also adopt a purely ACH payment to ensure that payments are done real-time. 3. CNMI should improve their record-keeping and document retention policies implementation by properly utilizing the database functionality of their current Enterprise Resources Planning (ERP) software, which is Tyler MUNIS. Views of Responsible Officials: Conditions 1 and 3a - CNMI CCDF Program agrees with this finding. To strengthen oversight and ensure adequate accountability over Federal awards, the CNMI CCDF Program has implemented a filing system where all documents relating to a federal award are properly maintained and labeled for accessibility. This system became effective on October 1, 2025. Conditions 2 and 3b - CNMI CCDF Program agrees with this finding and acknowledges the need to strengthen internal controls to ensure that all expenditures are cleared by the bank before the end of the liquidation period. Refer to CNMI’s Corrective Action Plan for additional information.
Period of Performance Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program Title: Block Grants for Community Mental Health Services ALN: 93.958 Pass-Through Agency: N/A Pass-Through Number(s): N/A Award Number and Period: 1B09SM087345, 6B09SM087345, 1B09SM087322-01 October 1, 2022 – September 30, 2024, October 17,2022 – October 16, 2024 Statistically Valid Sample: No, and not intended to be a statistically valid sample Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance and Noncompliance Criteria or specific requirement: Per 2 CFR 200.303(a), a non-Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that it is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in the “Internal Control Integrated Framework” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Per 2 CFR 200.403(h) cost must be incurred during the approved budget period. The Federal awarding agency is authorized, at its discretion, to waive prior written approvals to carry forward unobligated balances to subsequent budget periods pursuant to § 200.308(e)(3). Condition: For projects with period of performance beginning dates during the fiscal year, audit procedures included testing transactions posted to the general ledger during the first month of the award. We noted the following instances of noncompliance: For the two sampled transactions, totaling $56,997, one of the expenditures, totaling $31,254, was related to costs incurred prior to the period of performance begin date. Questioned costs: $31,254. Context: See “Condition.” Cause: Current controls are not at the correct precision level to detect costs charged outside of the period of performance. Effect: Ineffective internal controls may result in questioned costs and noncompliance with the terms of the grant. Repeat finding: No Recommendation: HHSC should enhance and/or modify existing controls to ensure that costs charged to a project have service dates within the period of performance stated in the federal award. Views of responsible officials: HHSC concurs with the finding.
Period of Performance Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program Title: Block Grants for Community Mental Health Services ALN: 93.958 Pass-Through Agency: N/A Pass-Through Number(s): N/A Award Number and Period: 1B09SM087345, 6B09SM087345, 1B09SM087322-01 October 1, 2022 – September 30, 2024, October 17,2022 – October 16, 2024 Statistically Valid Sample: No, and not intended to be a statistically valid sample Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance and Noncompliance Criteria or specific requirement: Per 2 CFR 200.303(a), a non-Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that it is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in the “Internal Control Integrated Framework” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Per 2 CFR 200.403(h) cost must be incurred during the approved budget period. The Federal awarding agency is authorized, at its discretion, to waive prior written approvals to carry forward unobligated balances to subsequent budget periods pursuant to § 200.308(e)(3). Condition: For projects with period of performance beginning dates during the fiscal year, audit procedures included testing transactions posted to the general ledger during the first month of the award. We noted the following instances of noncompliance: For the two sampled transactions, totaling $56,997, one of the expenditures, totaling $31,254, was related to costs incurred prior to the period of performance begin date. Questioned costs: $31,254. Context: See “Condition.” Cause: Current controls are not at the correct precision level to detect costs charged outside of the period of performance. Effect: Ineffective internal controls may result in questioned costs and noncompliance with the terms of the grant. Repeat finding: No Recommendation: HHSC should enhance and/or modify existing controls to ensure that costs charged to a project have service dates within the period of performance stated in the federal award. Views of responsible officials: HHSC concurs with the finding.
Period of Performance Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program Title: Block Grants for Community Mental Health Services ALN: 93.958 Pass-Through Agency: N/A Pass-Through Number(s): N/A Award Number and Period: 1B09SM087345, 6B09SM087345, 1B09SM087322-01 October 1, 2022 – September 30, 2024, October 17,2022 – October 16, 2024 Statistically Valid Sample: No, and not intended to be a statistically valid sample Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance and Noncompliance Criteria or specific requirement: Per 2 CFR 200.303(a), a non-Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that it is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in the “Internal Control Integrated Framework” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Per 2 CFR 200.403(h) cost must be incurred during the approved budget period. The Federal awarding agency is authorized, at its discretion, to waive prior written approvals to carry forward unobligated balances to subsequent budget periods pursuant to § 200.308(e)(3). Condition: For projects with period of performance beginning dates during the fiscal year, audit procedures included testing transactions posted to the general ledger during the first month of the award. We noted the following instances of noncompliance: For the two sampled transactions, totaling $56,997, one of the expenditures, totaling $31,254, was related to costs incurred prior to the period of performance begin date. Questioned costs: $31,254. Context: See “Condition.” Cause: Current controls are not at the correct precision level to detect costs charged outside of the period of performance. Effect: Ineffective internal controls may result in questioned costs and noncompliance with the terms of the grant. Repeat finding: No Recommendation: HHSC should enhance and/or modify existing controls to ensure that costs charged to a project have service dates within the period of performance stated in the federal award. Views of responsible officials: HHSC concurs with the finding.
Period of Performance Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program Title: Block Grants for Community Mental Health Services ALN: 93.958 Pass-Through Agency: N/A Pass-Through Number(s): N/A Award Number and Period: 1B09SM087345, 6B09SM087345, 1B09SM087322-01 October 1, 2022 – September 30, 2024, October 17,2022 – October 16, 2024 Statistically Valid Sample: No, and not intended to be a statistically valid sample Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance and Noncompliance Criteria or specific requirement: Per 2 CFR 200.303(a), a non-Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that it is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in the “Internal Control Integrated Framework” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Per 2 CFR 200.403(h) cost must be incurred during the approved budget period. The Federal awarding agency is authorized, at its discretion, to waive prior written approvals to carry forward unobligated balances to subsequent budget periods pursuant to § 200.308(e)(3). Condition: For projects with period of performance beginning dates during the fiscal year, audit procedures included testing transactions posted to the general ledger during the first month of the award. We noted the following instances of noncompliance: For the two sampled transactions, totaling $56,997, one of the expenditures, totaling $31,254, was related to costs incurred prior to the period of performance begin date. Questioned costs: $31,254. Context: See “Condition.” Cause: Current controls are not at the correct precision level to detect costs charged outside of the period of performance. Effect: Ineffective internal controls may result in questioned costs and noncompliance with the terms of the grant. Repeat finding: No Recommendation: HHSC should enhance and/or modify existing controls to ensure that costs charged to a project have service dates within the period of performance stated in the federal award. Views of responsible officials: HHSC concurs with the finding.
Period of Performance Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program Title: Block Grants for Community Mental Health Services ALN: 93.958 Pass-Through Agency: N/A Pass-Through Number(s): N/A Award Number and Period: 1B09SM087345, 6B09SM087345, 1B09SM087322-01 October 1, 2022 – September 30, 2024, October 17,2022 – October 16, 2024 Statistically Valid Sample: No, and not intended to be a statistically valid sample Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance and Noncompliance Criteria or specific requirement: Per 2 CFR 200.303(a), a non-Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that it is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in the “Internal Control Integrated Framework” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Per 2 CFR 200.403(h) cost must be incurred during the approved budget period. The Federal awarding agency is authorized, at its discretion, to waive prior written approvals to carry forward unobligated balances to subsequent budget periods pursuant to § 200.308(e)(3). Condition: For projects with period of performance beginning dates during the fiscal year, audit procedures included testing transactions posted to the general ledger during the first month of the award. We noted the following instances of noncompliance: For the two sampled transactions, totaling $56,997, one of the expenditures, totaling $31,254, was related to costs incurred prior to the period of performance begin date. Questioned costs: $31,254. Context: See “Condition.” Cause: Current controls are not at the correct precision level to detect costs charged outside of the period of performance. Effect: Ineffective internal controls may result in questioned costs and noncompliance with the terms of the grant. Repeat finding: No Recommendation: HHSC should enhance and/or modify existing controls to ensure that costs charged to a project have service dates within the period of performance stated in the federal award. Views of responsible officials: HHSC concurs with the finding.
Period of Performance Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program Title: Block Grants for Community Mental Health Services ALN: 93.958 Pass-Through Agency: N/A Pass-Through Number(s): N/A Award Number and Period: 1B09SM087345, 6B09SM087345, 1B09SM087322-01 October 1, 2022 – September 30, 2024, October 17,2022 – October 16, 2024 Statistically Valid Sample: No, and not intended to be a statistically valid sample Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance and Noncompliance Criteria or specific requirement: Per 2 CFR 200.303(a), a non-Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that it is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in the “Internal Control Integrated Framework” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Per 2 CFR 200.403(h) cost must be incurred during the approved budget period. The Federal awarding agency is authorized, at its discretion, to waive prior written approvals to carry forward unobligated balances to subsequent budget periods pursuant to § 200.308(e)(3). Condition: For projects with period of performance beginning dates during the fiscal year, audit procedures included testing transactions posted to the general ledger during the first month of the award. We noted the following instances of noncompliance: For the two sampled transactions, totaling $56,997, one of the expenditures, totaling $31,254, was related to costs incurred prior to the period of performance begin date. Questioned costs: $31,254. Context: See “Condition.” Cause: Current controls are not at the correct precision level to detect costs charged outside of the period of performance. Effect: Ineffective internal controls may result in questioned costs and noncompliance with the terms of the grant. Repeat finding: No Recommendation: HHSC should enhance and/or modify existing controls to ensure that costs charged to a project have service dates within the period of performance stated in the federal award. Views of responsible officials: HHSC concurs with the finding.
US Department of Education Program Title: Education Stabilization Fund CFDA Number(s): 84.425C, 84.425D, 84.425U, 84.425W Federal Award Number: 201201-2122, 213712-2021, 213742-2122,213713-2122 & 2223 (COVID-19) Federal Award Year: July 1, 2022 to June 30, 2023 Pass-Through Entity: Passed-Through Michigan Department of Education Type of Compliance: Significant Deficiency (Activities Allowed/Unallowed and Allowable Costs) Criteria: The OMB requires that recipients of federal funds report deviations from the approved budget and request approvals from Federal awarding agencies for any revisions [2 CFR Part 200.308(b)]. Condition: The District submitted a final expenditure report to the State where certain line-item expenditures were reported in such a way that caused the report to appear over budget by greater than 10%. Cause: This condition was the result of the lack of oversight by appropriate personnel to review the final expenditure report before it was submitted to the State. Effect: As a result of this condition, the District did not fully comply with the budgeting requirement of expenditures being within 10% of the approved budget due to reporting expenditures in the wrong areas on the final expenditure report. Questioned Costs: None Perspective Information: The incident at hand appears to be an isolated instance as the business manager position has been turned over 3 times in the past 3 years. The District’s general ledger had expenditures that were properly spent in accordance with the approved budget and correctly classified in the general ledger, however, the District simply reported the wrong numbers on the Final Expenditure Report for certain Activities and Objects, but the correct amounts were spent in accordance with the approved budget. All of final expenditure report submissions after the incident did not have this same problem and were reported accurately. Recommendation: We recommend the District have appropriate personnel review the final expenditure report before final submission to the State. Views of Responsible Officials: There is a new business manager responsible for any future final expenditure report submissions. They will closely monitor this situation going forward to avoid this from happening in the future.
US Department of Education Program Title: Education Stabilization Fund CFDA Number(s): 84.425C, 84.425D, 84.425U, 84.425W Federal Award Number: 201201-2122, 213712-2021, 213742-2122,213713-2122 & 2223 (COVID-19) Federal Award Year: July 1, 2022 to June 30, 2023 Pass-Through Entity: Passed-Through Michigan Department of Education Type of Compliance: Significant Deficiency (Activities Allowed/Unallowed and Allowable Costs) Criteria: The OMB requires that recipients of federal funds report deviations from the approved budget and request approvals from Federal awarding agencies for any revisions [2 CFR Part 200.308(b)]. Condition: The District submitted a final expenditure report to the State where certain line-item expenditures were reported in such a way that caused the report to appear over budget by greater than 10%. Cause: This condition was the result of the lack of oversight by appropriate personnel to review the final expenditure report before it was submitted to the State. Effect: As a result of this condition, the District did not fully comply with the budgeting requirement of expenditures being within 10% of the approved budget due to reporting expenditures in the wrong areas on the final expenditure report. Questioned Costs: None Perspective Information: The incident at hand appears to be an isolated instance as the business manager position has been turned over 3 times in the past 3 years. The District’s general ledger had expenditures that were properly spent in accordance with the approved budget and correctly classified in the general ledger, however, the District simply reported the wrong numbers on the Final Expenditure Report for certain Activities and Objects, but the correct amounts were spent in accordance with the approved budget. All of final expenditure report submissions after the incident did not have this same problem and were reported accurately. Recommendation: We recommend the District have appropriate personnel review the final expenditure report before final submission to the State. Views of Responsible Officials: There is a new business manager responsible for any future final expenditure report submissions. They will closely monitor this situation going forward to avoid this from happening in the future.
US Department of Education Program Title: Education Stabilization Fund CFDA Number(s): 84.425C, 84.425D, 84.425U, 84.425W Federal Award Number: 201201-2122, 213712-2021, 213742-2122,213713-2122 & 2223 (COVID-19) Federal Award Year: July 1, 2022 to June 30, 2023 Pass-Through Entity: Passed-Through Michigan Department of Education Type of Compliance: Significant Deficiency (Activities Allowed/Unallowed and Allowable Costs) Criteria: The OMB requires that recipients of federal funds report deviations from the approved budget and request approvals from Federal awarding agencies for any revisions [2 CFR Part 200.308(b)]. Condition: The District submitted a final expenditure report to the State where certain line-item expenditures were reported in such a way that caused the report to appear over budget by greater than 10%. Cause: This condition was the result of the lack of oversight by appropriate personnel to review the final expenditure report before it was submitted to the State. Effect: As a result of this condition, the District did not fully comply with the budgeting requirement of expenditures being within 10% of the approved budget due to reporting expenditures in the wrong areas on the final expenditure report. Questioned Costs: None Perspective Information: The incident at hand appears to be an isolated instance as the business manager position has been turned over 3 times in the past 3 years. The District’s general ledger had expenditures that were properly spent in accordance with the approved budget and correctly classified in the general ledger, however, the District simply reported the wrong numbers on the Final Expenditure Report for certain Activities and Objects, but the correct amounts were spent in accordance with the approved budget. All of final expenditure report submissions after the incident did not have this same problem and were reported accurately. Recommendation: We recommend the District have appropriate personnel review the final expenditure report before final submission to the State. Views of Responsible Officials: There is a new business manager responsible for any future final expenditure report submissions. They will closely monitor this situation going forward to avoid this from happening in the future.
US Department of Education Program Title: Education Stabilization Fund CFDA Number(s): 84.425C, 84.425D, 84.425U, 84.425W Federal Award Number: 201201-2122, 213712-2021, 213742-2122,213713-2122 & 2223 (COVID-19) Federal Award Year: July 1, 2022 to June 30, 2023 Pass-Through Entity: Passed-Through Michigan Department of Education Type of Compliance: Significant Deficiency (Activities Allowed/Unallowed and Allowable Costs) Criteria: The OMB requires that recipients of federal funds report deviations from the approved budget and request approvals from Federal awarding agencies for any revisions [2 CFR Part 200.308(b)]. Condition: The District submitted a final expenditure report to the State where certain line-item expenditures were reported in such a way that caused the report to appear over budget by greater than 10%. Cause: This condition was the result of the lack of oversight by appropriate personnel to review the final expenditure report before it was submitted to the State. Effect: As a result of this condition, the District did not fully comply with the budgeting requirement of expenditures being within 10% of the approved budget due to reporting expenditures in the wrong areas on the final expenditure report. Questioned Costs: None Perspective Information: The incident at hand appears to be an isolated instance as the business manager position has been turned over 3 times in the past 3 years. The District’s general ledger had expenditures that were properly spent in accordance with the approved budget and correctly classified in the general ledger, however, the District simply reported the wrong numbers on the Final Expenditure Report for certain Activities and Objects, but the correct amounts were spent in accordance with the approved budget. All of final expenditure report submissions after the incident did not have this same problem and were reported accurately. Recommendation: We recommend the District have appropriate personnel review the final expenditure report before final submission to the State. Views of Responsible Officials: There is a new business manager responsible for any future final expenditure report submissions. They will closely monitor this situation going forward to avoid this from happening in the future.
2023-005 – PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE Type: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control / Non-compliance Program: ALN 84.425 Education Stabilization Fund, COVID-19 - ESSER II – Credit Recovery Criteria: As detailed by 2 CFR 200.308, 2 CFR 200.309, and 2 CFR 200 403(h), A non-federal entity may only charge allowable costs incurred 1) during the approved budget period, or 2) before the approved budget period if authorized by the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity. Condition: During testing of amounts charged to the grants, it was noted that an amount charged to the grant was incurred outside the approved budget period of performance. Cause/Effect: This condition appears to be the result of a misunderstanding of costs allowed under this grant. These costs were not in compliance with 2 CFR 200. Recommendation: We recommend that the District review all grant agreements to gain a thorough understanding of the period of performance for each grant and then establish/modify internal controls to assure that only costs incurred within the approved budget period of performance are charged to the grant. View of Responsible Official: Management is in agreement with this recommendation
2023 – 002 INTERNAL CONTROLS OVER DISBURSEMENTS Significant Deficiency U.S. DEPARTMENTS OF EDUCATION Federal Assistance No. 84.425U COVID-19: ARP - Elementary and Secondary Schools Emergency Relief Passthrough Agency: New Mexico Public Education Department Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Condition: During the testing there was an invoice in the amount of $299,271 that was paid of twice during June 2023. The expenditure was submitted for reimbursement from federal funds. The District was notified by the vendor of the double payment while asking to use it as credit against a separate invoice. Criteria: PART 200—UNIFORM ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS, COST PRINCIPLES, AND AUDIT REQUIREMENTS FOR FEDERAL AWARDS § 200.303 Internal controls. The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). (b) Comply with the U.S. Constitution, Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal awards. (c) Evaluate and monitor the non-Federal entity's compliance with statutes, regulations and the terms and conditions of Federal awards. (d) Take prompt action when instances of noncompliance are identified including noncompliance identified in audit findings. (e) Take reasonable measures to safeguard protected personally identifiable information and other information the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity designates as sensitive or the non-Federal entity considers sensitive consistent with applicable Federal, State, local, and tribal laws regarding privacy and responsibility over confidentiality. § 200.403 Factors affecting allowability of costs. Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. (c) Be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the non- Federal entity. (d) Be accorded consistent treatment. A cost may not be assigned to a Federal award as a direct cost if any other cost incurred for the same purpose in like circumstances has been allocated to the Federal award as an indirect cost. (e) Be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), except, for state and local governments and Indian tribes only, as otherwise provided for in this part. (f) Not be included as a cost or used to meet cost sharing or matching requirements of any other federally-financed program in either the current or a prior period. See also § 200.306(b). (g) Be adequately documented. See also § 200.300 through 200.309 of this part. (h) Cost must be incurred during the approved budget period. The Federal awarding agency is authorized, at its discretion, to waive prior written approvals to carry forward unobligated balances to subsequent budget periods pursuant to § 200.308(e)(3). Cause: The facilities department submitted the invoice to the finance department for payment at the beginning of June and towards the end of June. The accounts payable clerk bypassed the system error that the invoice number had been entered previously. Questioned costs: $299,271 was the amount of the duplicate payment. The expenditure from the duplicate payment was not reported in the schedule of expenditures in federal awards and was reported as a receivable from the vendor in the financial statements for Fund 24330. Effect or potential effect: Expenditures could be overstated, as well as revenues, if invoices are paid more than once and then also reimbursed. As a result, a receivable and unearned income must be recognized. Recommendation: Training should be given to accounts payable staff regarding the importance system warnings and the need to monitor invoices form the vendors. A tracking system should be implemented for tracking major projects to ensure than invoices are not reported more than once. Invoices should be stamped received upon receipt, marked when applied to a major project, and marked recorded once entered into the accounting system. Management’s response: Executive Director of Finance: Management agrees with this finding. The school district converted to a new financial ERP system as of July 1, 2023. The new ERP system flags any duplicate invoice numbers that maybe entered. The Accounts Payable (A/P) staff will verify if payment has already been made. On occasion, payment requests do not have an invoice number. To prevent duplicate payments, the Accounts Payable staff require original invoices and uses a system generated invoice number, or a will use a manual entry numbering convention to prevent duplicate invoice numbers. The invoice data is entered by an Accounts Payable specialist and reviewed by the Accounts Payable Manager. On occasion, A/P must request corrected invoices from vendors who try and reuse invoice numbers. The A/P Manager reviews invoice numbers during the check run for accuracy. Purchasing and A/P will also periodically review the vendor database for duplicate vendors. For construction projects that list a pay application number instead of an invoice number, A/P will implement a consistent invoice numbering convention to avoid duplicate payments. The A/P specialists will also review the PO payment history prior to processing. Responsible party(ies) for corrective action(s): Accounts Payable Manager Corrective action(s) timeline: December 1, 2023
2023 – 002 INTERNAL CONTROLS OVER DISBURSEMENTS Significant Deficiency U.S. DEPARTMENTS OF EDUCATION Federal Assistance No. 84.425U COVID-19: ARP - Elementary and Secondary Schools Emergency Relief Passthrough Agency: New Mexico Public Education Department Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Condition: During the testing there was an invoice in the amount of $299,271 that was paid of twice during June 2023. The expenditure was submitted for reimbursement from federal funds. The District was notified by the vendor of the double payment while asking to use it as credit against a separate invoice. Criteria: PART 200—UNIFORM ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS, COST PRINCIPLES, AND AUDIT REQUIREMENTS FOR FEDERAL AWARDS § 200.303 Internal controls. The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). (b) Comply with the U.S. Constitution, Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal awards. (c) Evaluate and monitor the non-Federal entity's compliance with statutes, regulations and the terms and conditions of Federal awards. (d) Take prompt action when instances of noncompliance are identified including noncompliance identified in audit findings. (e) Take reasonable measures to safeguard protected personally identifiable information and other information the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity designates as sensitive or the non-Federal entity considers sensitive consistent with applicable Federal, State, local, and tribal laws regarding privacy and responsibility over confidentiality. § 200.403 Factors affecting allowability of costs. Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. (c) Be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the non- Federal entity. (d) Be accorded consistent treatment. A cost may not be assigned to a Federal award as a direct cost if any other cost incurred for the same purpose in like circumstances has been allocated to the Federal award as an indirect cost. (e) Be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), except, for state and local governments and Indian tribes only, as otherwise provided for in this part. (f) Not be included as a cost or used to meet cost sharing or matching requirements of any other federally-financed program in either the current or a prior period. See also § 200.306(b). (g) Be adequately documented. See also § 200.300 through 200.309 of this part. (h) Cost must be incurred during the approved budget period. The Federal awarding agency is authorized, at its discretion, to waive prior written approvals to carry forward unobligated balances to subsequent budget periods pursuant to § 200.308(e)(3). Cause: The facilities department submitted the invoice to the finance department for payment at the beginning of June and towards the end of June. The accounts payable clerk bypassed the system error that the invoice number had been entered previously. Questioned costs: $299,271 was the amount of the duplicate payment. The expenditure from the duplicate payment was not reported in the schedule of expenditures in federal awards and was reported as a receivable from the vendor in the financial statements for Fund 24330. Effect or potential effect: Expenditures could be overstated, as well as revenues, if invoices are paid more than once and then also reimbursed. As a result, a receivable and unearned income must be recognized. Recommendation: Training should be given to accounts payable staff regarding the importance system warnings and the need to monitor invoices form the vendors. A tracking system should be implemented for tracking major projects to ensure than invoices are not reported more than once. Invoices should be stamped received upon receipt, marked when applied to a major project, and marked recorded once entered into the accounting system. Management’s response: Executive Director of Finance: Management agrees with this finding. The school district converted to a new financial ERP system as of July 1, 2023. The new ERP system flags any duplicate invoice numbers that maybe entered. The Accounts Payable (A/P) staff will verify if payment has already been made. On occasion, payment requests do not have an invoice number. To prevent duplicate payments, the Accounts Payable staff require original invoices and uses a system generated invoice number, or a will use a manual entry numbering convention to prevent duplicate invoice numbers. The invoice data is entered by an Accounts Payable specialist and reviewed by the Accounts Payable Manager. On occasion, A/P must request corrected invoices from vendors who try and reuse invoice numbers. The A/P Manager reviews invoice numbers during the check run for accuracy. Purchasing and A/P will also periodically review the vendor database for duplicate vendors. For construction projects that list a pay application number instead of an invoice number, A/P will implement a consistent invoice numbering convention to avoid duplicate payments. The A/P specialists will also review the PO payment history prior to processing. Responsible party(ies) for corrective action(s): Accounts Payable Manager Corrective action(s) timeline: December 1, 2023
2023 – 002 INTERNAL CONTROLS OVER DISBURSEMENTS Significant Deficiency U.S. DEPARTMENTS OF EDUCATION Federal Assistance No. 84.425U COVID-19: ARP - Elementary and Secondary Schools Emergency Relief Passthrough Agency: New Mexico Public Education Department Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Condition: During the testing there was an invoice in the amount of $299,271 that was paid of twice during June 2023. The expenditure was submitted for reimbursement from federal funds. The District was notified by the vendor of the double payment while asking to use it as credit against a separate invoice. Criteria: PART 200—UNIFORM ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS, COST PRINCIPLES, AND AUDIT REQUIREMENTS FOR FEDERAL AWARDS § 200.303 Internal controls. The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). (b) Comply with the U.S. Constitution, Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal awards. (c) Evaluate and monitor the non-Federal entity's compliance with statutes, regulations and the terms and conditions of Federal awards. (d) Take prompt action when instances of noncompliance are identified including noncompliance identified in audit findings. (e) Take reasonable measures to safeguard protected personally identifiable information and other information the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity designates as sensitive or the non-Federal entity considers sensitive consistent with applicable Federal, State, local, and tribal laws regarding privacy and responsibility over confidentiality. § 200.403 Factors affecting allowability of costs. Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. (c) Be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the non- Federal entity. (d) Be accorded consistent treatment. A cost may not be assigned to a Federal award as a direct cost if any other cost incurred for the same purpose in like circumstances has been allocated to the Federal award as an indirect cost. (e) Be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), except, for state and local governments and Indian tribes only, as otherwise provided for in this part. (f) Not be included as a cost or used to meet cost sharing or matching requirements of any other federally-financed program in either the current or a prior period. See also § 200.306(b). (g) Be adequately documented. See also § 200.300 through 200.309 of this part. (h) Cost must be incurred during the approved budget period. The Federal awarding agency is authorized, at its discretion, to waive prior written approvals to carry forward unobligated balances to subsequent budget periods pursuant to § 200.308(e)(3). Cause: The facilities department submitted the invoice to the finance department for payment at the beginning of June and towards the end of June. The accounts payable clerk bypassed the system error that the invoice number had been entered previously. Questioned costs: $299,271 was the amount of the duplicate payment. The expenditure from the duplicate payment was not reported in the schedule of expenditures in federal awards and was reported as a receivable from the vendor in the financial statements for Fund 24330. Effect or potential effect: Expenditures could be overstated, as well as revenues, if invoices are paid more than once and then also reimbursed. As a result, a receivable and unearned income must be recognized. Recommendation: Training should be given to accounts payable staff regarding the importance system warnings and the need to monitor invoices form the vendors. A tracking system should be implemented for tracking major projects to ensure than invoices are not reported more than once. Invoices should be stamped received upon receipt, marked when applied to a major project, and marked recorded once entered into the accounting system. Management’s response: Executive Director of Finance: Management agrees with this finding. The school district converted to a new financial ERP system as of July 1, 2023. The new ERP system flags any duplicate invoice numbers that maybe entered. The Accounts Payable (A/P) staff will verify if payment has already been made. On occasion, payment requests do not have an invoice number. To prevent duplicate payments, the Accounts Payable staff require original invoices and uses a system generated invoice number, or a will use a manual entry numbering convention to prevent duplicate invoice numbers. The invoice data is entered by an Accounts Payable specialist and reviewed by the Accounts Payable Manager. On occasion, A/P must request corrected invoices from vendors who try and reuse invoice numbers. The A/P Manager reviews invoice numbers during the check run for accuracy. Purchasing and A/P will also periodically review the vendor database for duplicate vendors. For construction projects that list a pay application number instead of an invoice number, A/P will implement a consistent invoice numbering convention to avoid duplicate payments. The A/P specialists will also review the PO payment history prior to processing. Responsible party(ies) for corrective action(s): Accounts Payable Manager Corrective action(s) timeline: December 1, 2023
2023 – 002 INTERNAL CONTROLS OVER DISBURSEMENTS Significant Deficiency U.S. DEPARTMENTS OF EDUCATION Federal Assistance No. 84.425U COVID-19: ARP - Elementary and Secondary Schools Emergency Relief Passthrough Agency: New Mexico Public Education Department Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Condition: During the testing there was an invoice in the amount of $299,271 that was paid of twice during June 2023. The expenditure was submitted for reimbursement from federal funds. The District was notified by the vendor of the double payment while asking to use it as credit against a separate invoice. Criteria: PART 200—UNIFORM ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS, COST PRINCIPLES, AND AUDIT REQUIREMENTS FOR FEDERAL AWARDS § 200.303 Internal controls. The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). (b) Comply with the U.S. Constitution, Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal awards. (c) Evaluate and monitor the non-Federal entity's compliance with statutes, regulations and the terms and conditions of Federal awards. (d) Take prompt action when instances of noncompliance are identified including noncompliance identified in audit findings. (e) Take reasonable measures to safeguard protected personally identifiable information and other information the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity designates as sensitive or the non-Federal entity considers sensitive consistent with applicable Federal, State, local, and tribal laws regarding privacy and responsibility over confidentiality. § 200.403 Factors affecting allowability of costs. Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. (c) Be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the non- Federal entity. (d) Be accorded consistent treatment. A cost may not be assigned to a Federal award as a direct cost if any other cost incurred for the same purpose in like circumstances has been allocated to the Federal award as an indirect cost. (e) Be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), except, for state and local governments and Indian tribes only, as otherwise provided for in this part. (f) Not be included as a cost or used to meet cost sharing or matching requirements of any other federally-financed program in either the current or a prior period. See also § 200.306(b). (g) Be adequately documented. See also § 200.300 through 200.309 of this part. (h) Cost must be incurred during the approved budget period. The Federal awarding agency is authorized, at its discretion, to waive prior written approvals to carry forward unobligated balances to subsequent budget periods pursuant to § 200.308(e)(3). Cause: The facilities department submitted the invoice to the finance department for payment at the beginning of June and towards the end of June. The accounts payable clerk bypassed the system error that the invoice number had been entered previously. Questioned costs: $299,271 was the amount of the duplicate payment. The expenditure from the duplicate payment was not reported in the schedule of expenditures in federal awards and was reported as a receivable from the vendor in the financial statements for Fund 24330. Effect or potential effect: Expenditures could be overstated, as well as revenues, if invoices are paid more than once and then also reimbursed. As a result, a receivable and unearned income must be recognized. Recommendation: Training should be given to accounts payable staff regarding the importance system warnings and the need to monitor invoices form the vendors. A tracking system should be implemented for tracking major projects to ensure than invoices are not reported more than once. Invoices should be stamped received upon receipt, marked when applied to a major project, and marked recorded once entered into the accounting system. Management’s response: Executive Director of Finance: Management agrees with this finding. The school district converted to a new financial ERP system as of July 1, 2023. The new ERP system flags any duplicate invoice numbers that maybe entered. The Accounts Payable (A/P) staff will verify if payment has already been made. On occasion, payment requests do not have an invoice number. To prevent duplicate payments, the Accounts Payable staff require original invoices and uses a system generated invoice number, or a will use a manual entry numbering convention to prevent duplicate invoice numbers. The invoice data is entered by an Accounts Payable specialist and reviewed by the Accounts Payable Manager. On occasion, A/P must request corrected invoices from vendors who try and reuse invoice numbers. The A/P Manager reviews invoice numbers during the check run for accuracy. Purchasing and A/P will also periodically review the vendor database for duplicate vendors. For construction projects that list a pay application number instead of an invoice number, A/P will implement a consistent invoice numbering convention to avoid duplicate payments. The A/P specialists will also review the PO payment history prior to processing. Responsible party(ies) for corrective action(s): Accounts Payable Manager Corrective action(s) timeline: December 1, 2023
2023 – 002 INTERNAL CONTROLS OVER DISBURSEMENTS Significant Deficiency U.S. DEPARTMENTS OF EDUCATION Federal Assistance No. 84.425U COVID-19: ARP - Elementary and Secondary Schools Emergency Relief Passthrough Agency: New Mexico Public Education Department Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Condition: During the testing there was an invoice in the amount of $299,271 that was paid of twice during June 2023. The expenditure was submitted for reimbursement from federal funds. The District was notified by the vendor of the double payment while asking to use it as credit against a separate invoice. Criteria: PART 200—UNIFORM ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS, COST PRINCIPLES, AND AUDIT REQUIREMENTS FOR FEDERAL AWARDS § 200.303 Internal controls. The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). (b) Comply with the U.S. Constitution, Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal awards. (c) Evaluate and monitor the non-Federal entity's compliance with statutes, regulations and the terms and conditions of Federal awards. (d) Take prompt action when instances of noncompliance are identified including noncompliance identified in audit findings. (e) Take reasonable measures to safeguard protected personally identifiable information and other information the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity designates as sensitive or the non-Federal entity considers sensitive consistent with applicable Federal, State, local, and tribal laws regarding privacy and responsibility over confidentiality. § 200.403 Factors affecting allowability of costs. Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. (c) Be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the non- Federal entity. (d) Be accorded consistent treatment. A cost may not be assigned to a Federal award as a direct cost if any other cost incurred for the same purpose in like circumstances has been allocated to the Federal award as an indirect cost. (e) Be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), except, for state and local governments and Indian tribes only, as otherwise provided for in this part. (f) Not be included as a cost or used to meet cost sharing or matching requirements of any other federally-financed program in either the current or a prior period. See also § 200.306(b). (g) Be adequately documented. See also § 200.300 through 200.309 of this part. (h) Cost must be incurred during the approved budget period. The Federal awarding agency is authorized, at its discretion, to waive prior written approvals to carry forward unobligated balances to subsequent budget periods pursuant to § 200.308(e)(3). Cause: The facilities department submitted the invoice to the finance department for payment at the beginning of June and towards the end of June. The accounts payable clerk bypassed the system error that the invoice number had been entered previously. Questioned costs: $299,271 was the amount of the duplicate payment. The expenditure from the duplicate payment was not reported in the schedule of expenditures in federal awards and was reported as a receivable from the vendor in the financial statements for Fund 24330. Effect or potential effect: Expenditures could be overstated, as well as revenues, if invoices are paid more than once and then also reimbursed. As a result, a receivable and unearned income must be recognized. Recommendation: Training should be given to accounts payable staff regarding the importance system warnings and the need to monitor invoices form the vendors. A tracking system should be implemented for tracking major projects to ensure than invoices are not reported more than once. Invoices should be stamped received upon receipt, marked when applied to a major project, and marked recorded once entered into the accounting system. Management’s response: Executive Director of Finance: Management agrees with this finding. The school district converted to a new financial ERP system as of July 1, 2023. The new ERP system flags any duplicate invoice numbers that maybe entered. The Accounts Payable (A/P) staff will verify if payment has already been made. On occasion, payment requests do not have an invoice number. To prevent duplicate payments, the Accounts Payable staff require original invoices and uses a system generated invoice number, or a will use a manual entry numbering convention to prevent duplicate invoice numbers. The invoice data is entered by an Accounts Payable specialist and reviewed by the Accounts Payable Manager. On occasion, A/P must request corrected invoices from vendors who try and reuse invoice numbers. The A/P Manager reviews invoice numbers during the check run for accuracy. Purchasing and A/P will also periodically review the vendor database for duplicate vendors. For construction projects that list a pay application number instead of an invoice number, A/P will implement a consistent invoice numbering convention to avoid duplicate payments. The A/P specialists will also review the PO payment history prior to processing. Responsible party(ies) for corrective action(s): Accounts Payable Manager Corrective action(s) timeline: December 1, 2023
2023 – 002 INTERNAL CONTROLS OVER DISBURSEMENTS Significant Deficiency U.S. DEPARTMENTS OF EDUCATION Federal Assistance No. 84.425U COVID-19: ARP - Elementary and Secondary Schools Emergency Relief Passthrough Agency: New Mexico Public Education Department Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Condition: During the testing there was an invoice in the amount of $299,271 that was paid of twice during June 2023. The expenditure was submitted for reimbursement from federal funds. The District was notified by the vendor of the double payment while asking to use it as credit against a separate invoice. Criteria: PART 200—UNIFORM ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS, COST PRINCIPLES, AND AUDIT REQUIREMENTS FOR FEDERAL AWARDS § 200.303 Internal controls. The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). (b) Comply with the U.S. Constitution, Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal awards. (c) Evaluate and monitor the non-Federal entity's compliance with statutes, regulations and the terms and conditions of Federal awards. (d) Take prompt action when instances of noncompliance are identified including noncompliance identified in audit findings. (e) Take reasonable measures to safeguard protected personally identifiable information and other information the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity designates as sensitive or the non-Federal entity considers sensitive consistent with applicable Federal, State, local, and tribal laws regarding privacy and responsibility over confidentiality. § 200.403 Factors affecting allowability of costs. Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. (c) Be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the non- Federal entity. (d) Be accorded consistent treatment. A cost may not be assigned to a Federal award as a direct cost if any other cost incurred for the same purpose in like circumstances has been allocated to the Federal award as an indirect cost. (e) Be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), except, for state and local governments and Indian tribes only, as otherwise provided for in this part. (f) Not be included as a cost or used to meet cost sharing or matching requirements of any other federally-financed program in either the current or a prior period. See also § 200.306(b). (g) Be adequately documented. See also § 200.300 through 200.309 of this part. (h) Cost must be incurred during the approved budget period. The Federal awarding agency is authorized, at its discretion, to waive prior written approvals to carry forward unobligated balances to subsequent budget periods pursuant to § 200.308(e)(3). Cause: The facilities department submitted the invoice to the finance department for payment at the beginning of June and towards the end of June. The accounts payable clerk bypassed the system error that the invoice number had been entered previously. Questioned costs: $299,271 was the amount of the duplicate payment. The expenditure from the duplicate payment was not reported in the schedule of expenditures in federal awards and was reported as a receivable from the vendor in the financial statements for Fund 24330. Effect or potential effect: Expenditures could be overstated, as well as revenues, if invoices are paid more than once and then also reimbursed. As a result, a receivable and unearned income must be recognized. Recommendation: Training should be given to accounts payable staff regarding the importance system warnings and the need to monitor invoices form the vendors. A tracking system should be implemented for tracking major projects to ensure than invoices are not reported more than once. Invoices should be stamped received upon receipt, marked when applied to a major project, and marked recorded once entered into the accounting system. Management’s response: Executive Director of Finance: Management agrees with this finding. The school district converted to a new financial ERP system as of July 1, 2023. The new ERP system flags any duplicate invoice numbers that maybe entered. The Accounts Payable (A/P) staff will verify if payment has already been made. On occasion, payment requests do not have an invoice number. To prevent duplicate payments, the Accounts Payable staff require original invoices and uses a system generated invoice number, or a will use a manual entry numbering convention to prevent duplicate invoice numbers. The invoice data is entered by an Accounts Payable specialist and reviewed by the Accounts Payable Manager. On occasion, A/P must request corrected invoices from vendors who try and reuse invoice numbers. The A/P Manager reviews invoice numbers during the check run for accuracy. Purchasing and A/P will also periodically review the vendor database for duplicate vendors. For construction projects that list a pay application number instead of an invoice number, A/P will implement a consistent invoice numbering convention to avoid duplicate payments. The A/P specialists will also review the PO payment history prior to processing. Responsible party(ies) for corrective action(s): Accounts Payable Manager Corrective action(s) timeline: December 1, 2023
2023 – 002 INTERNAL CONTROLS OVER DISBURSEMENTS Significant Deficiency U.S. DEPARTMENTS OF EDUCATION Federal Assistance No. 84.425U COVID-19: ARP - Elementary and Secondary Schools Emergency Relief Passthrough Agency: New Mexico Public Education Department Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Condition: During the testing there was an invoice in the amount of $299,271 that was paid of twice during June 2023. The expenditure was submitted for reimbursement from federal funds. The District was notified by the vendor of the double payment while asking to use it as credit against a separate invoice. Criteria: PART 200—UNIFORM ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS, COST PRINCIPLES, AND AUDIT REQUIREMENTS FOR FEDERAL AWARDS § 200.303 Internal controls. The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). (b) Comply with the U.S. Constitution, Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal awards. (c) Evaluate and monitor the non-Federal entity's compliance with statutes, regulations and the terms and conditions of Federal awards. (d) Take prompt action when instances of noncompliance are identified including noncompliance identified in audit findings. (e) Take reasonable measures to safeguard protected personally identifiable information and other information the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity designates as sensitive or the non-Federal entity considers sensitive consistent with applicable Federal, State, local, and tribal laws regarding privacy and responsibility over confidentiality. § 200.403 Factors affecting allowability of costs. Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. (c) Be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the non- Federal entity. (d) Be accorded consistent treatment. A cost may not be assigned to a Federal award as a direct cost if any other cost incurred for the same purpose in like circumstances has been allocated to the Federal award as an indirect cost. (e) Be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), except, for state and local governments and Indian tribes only, as otherwise provided for in this part. (f) Not be included as a cost or used to meet cost sharing or matching requirements of any other federally-financed program in either the current or a prior period. See also § 200.306(b). (g) Be adequately documented. See also § 200.300 through 200.309 of this part. (h) Cost must be incurred during the approved budget period. The Federal awarding agency is authorized, at its discretion, to waive prior written approvals to carry forward unobligated balances to subsequent budget periods pursuant to § 200.308(e)(3). Cause: The facilities department submitted the invoice to the finance department for payment at the beginning of June and towards the end of June. The accounts payable clerk bypassed the system error that the invoice number had been entered previously. Questioned costs: $299,271 was the amount of the duplicate payment. The expenditure from the duplicate payment was not reported in the schedule of expenditures in federal awards and was reported as a receivable from the vendor in the financial statements for Fund 24330. Effect or potential effect: Expenditures could be overstated, as well as revenues, if invoices are paid more than once and then also reimbursed. As a result, a receivable and unearned income must be recognized. Recommendation: Training should be given to accounts payable staff regarding the importance system warnings and the need to monitor invoices form the vendors. A tracking system should be implemented for tracking major projects to ensure than invoices are not reported more than once. Invoices should be stamped received upon receipt, marked when applied to a major project, and marked recorded once entered into the accounting system. Management’s response: Executive Director of Finance: Management agrees with this finding. The school district converted to a new financial ERP system as of July 1, 2023. The new ERP system flags any duplicate invoice numbers that maybe entered. The Accounts Payable (A/P) staff will verify if payment has already been made. On occasion, payment requests do not have an invoice number. To prevent duplicate payments, the Accounts Payable staff require original invoices and uses a system generated invoice number, or a will use a manual entry numbering convention to prevent duplicate invoice numbers. The invoice data is entered by an Accounts Payable specialist and reviewed by the Accounts Payable Manager. On occasion, A/P must request corrected invoices from vendors who try and reuse invoice numbers. The A/P Manager reviews invoice numbers during the check run for accuracy. Purchasing and A/P will also periodically review the vendor database for duplicate vendors. For construction projects that list a pay application number instead of an invoice number, A/P will implement a consistent invoice numbering convention to avoid duplicate payments. The A/P specialists will also review the PO payment history prior to processing. Responsible party(ies) for corrective action(s): Accounts Payable Manager Corrective action(s) timeline: December 1, 2023
2023 – 002 INTERNAL CONTROLS OVER DISBURSEMENTS Significant Deficiency U.S. DEPARTMENTS OF EDUCATION Federal Assistance No. 84.425U COVID-19: ARP - Elementary and Secondary Schools Emergency Relief Passthrough Agency: New Mexico Public Education Department Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Condition: During the testing there was an invoice in the amount of $299,271 that was paid of twice during June 2023. The expenditure was submitted for reimbursement from federal funds. The District was notified by the vendor of the double payment while asking to use it as credit against a separate invoice. Criteria: PART 200—UNIFORM ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS, COST PRINCIPLES, AND AUDIT REQUIREMENTS FOR FEDERAL AWARDS § 200.303 Internal controls. The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). (b) Comply with the U.S. Constitution, Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal awards. (c) Evaluate and monitor the non-Federal entity's compliance with statutes, regulations and the terms and conditions of Federal awards. (d) Take prompt action when instances of noncompliance are identified including noncompliance identified in audit findings. (e) Take reasonable measures to safeguard protected personally identifiable information and other information the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity designates as sensitive or the non-Federal entity considers sensitive consistent with applicable Federal, State, local, and tribal laws regarding privacy and responsibility over confidentiality. § 200.403 Factors affecting allowability of costs. Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. (c) Be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the non- Federal entity. (d) Be accorded consistent treatment. A cost may not be assigned to a Federal award as a direct cost if any other cost incurred for the same purpose in like circumstances has been allocated to the Federal award as an indirect cost. (e) Be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), except, for state and local governments and Indian tribes only, as otherwise provided for in this part. (f) Not be included as a cost or used to meet cost sharing or matching requirements of any other federally-financed program in either the current or a prior period. See also § 200.306(b). (g) Be adequately documented. See also § 200.300 through 200.309 of this part. (h) Cost must be incurred during the approved budget period. The Federal awarding agency is authorized, at its discretion, to waive prior written approvals to carry forward unobligated balances to subsequent budget periods pursuant to § 200.308(e)(3). Cause: The facilities department submitted the invoice to the finance department for payment at the beginning of June and towards the end of June. The accounts payable clerk bypassed the system error that the invoice number had been entered previously. Questioned costs: $299,271 was the amount of the duplicate payment. The expenditure from the duplicate payment was not reported in the schedule of expenditures in federal awards and was reported as a receivable from the vendor in the financial statements for Fund 24330. Effect or potential effect: Expenditures could be overstated, as well as revenues, if invoices are paid more than once and then also reimbursed. As a result, a receivable and unearned income must be recognized. Recommendation: Training should be given to accounts payable staff regarding the importance system warnings and the need to monitor invoices form the vendors. A tracking system should be implemented for tracking major projects to ensure than invoices are not reported more than once. Invoices should be stamped received upon receipt, marked when applied to a major project, and marked recorded once entered into the accounting system. Management’s response: Executive Director of Finance: Management agrees with this finding. The school district converted to a new financial ERP system as of July 1, 2023. The new ERP system flags any duplicate invoice numbers that maybe entered. The Accounts Payable (A/P) staff will verify if payment has already been made. On occasion, payment requests do not have an invoice number. To prevent duplicate payments, the Accounts Payable staff require original invoices and uses a system generated invoice number, or a will use a manual entry numbering convention to prevent duplicate invoice numbers. The invoice data is entered by an Accounts Payable specialist and reviewed by the Accounts Payable Manager. On occasion, A/P must request corrected invoices from vendors who try and reuse invoice numbers. The A/P Manager reviews invoice numbers during the check run for accuracy. Purchasing and A/P will also periodically review the vendor database for duplicate vendors. For construction projects that list a pay application number instead of an invoice number, A/P will implement a consistent invoice numbering convention to avoid duplicate payments. The A/P specialists will also review the PO payment history prior to processing. Responsible party(ies) for corrective action(s): Accounts Payable Manager Corrective action(s) timeline: December 1, 2023
FINDING 2023-001 Federal Program Information: Research and Development Cluster (ALN: 47.047) Criteria or Specific Requirement (Including Statutory, Regulatory or Other Citation): H. Period of Performance - Per Uniform Guidance, (2 CFR sections 200.308), the auditee may charge only allowable costs incurred during the approved budget period of a federal award’s period of performance. Condition: During our testing of research and development expenditures, we noted the following exception: • For 1 of the 25 selected research and development cluster grants had certain expenditures reported on the 2023 schedule of expenditures of federal awards that were incurred subsequent to the period of performance end date. Cause: Administrative oversight with respect to period of performance requirements. Effect or Potential Effect: The School is not properly following its policies and procedures in place to ensure compliance with period of performance requirements. Questioned Costs: $40,147 Context: We tested a sample of 25 research and development cluster grants and found 1 exception as noted in the condition with a total impact of $40,147. This is a condition identified per review of the School’s compliance with specific requirements using a statistically valid sample. Identification as a Repeat Finding: No similar findings noted in the prior year. Recommendation: We recommend that the School enhance its policies and procedures to ensure that expenditures are incurred and recorded during each grants’ respective performance period. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: We agree. The expenditures were reported on the schedule of expenditures for federal awards subsequent to the period of performance end date. These funds were not charged to the agency and are considered cost share for the grant as the work on the grant continued past the grant end date. We will review our grant close-out procedures to ensure that grants are closed out in a timely manner based on the grant end date preventing subsequent charges to the grant award.
Finding 2023-002: Questioned Cost – Material Weakness Criteria: A non-federal entity may charge only allowable costs incurred during the approved budget period of a federal award’s period of performance and any costs incurred before the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity made the federal award that were authorized by the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity (2 CFR sections 200.308 200.309 and 200.403(h)). Also, costs should not be included as a cost of any other federally financed programs in either the current or prior period. Costs charged to federal grants should be reviewed by an individual familiar with the Cost Principles for Nonprofit Organizations contained in 2 CFR, Section 200 as part of the SEFA review process. Condition: Costs for US Department of Transportation, Mobility Management Grant 20.507 Section 5307 included a $30,000 charge for use of the Data Management System (DMS). The charge is based on a contract rate charged to outside entities that varies depending on the number of users. Management stated the charge was to recoup costs for use of the DMS. Costs for the DMS consist of historical costs to get the system functioning, along with current personnel costs to operate the system and provide the contracted training. The historical costs occurred outside the period of performance and are thus unallowable. Personnel costs are already being charged to the grant through the allocated payroll and benefits of trainers and other personnel, and thus should not also be charged through the contract rate. In addition, if the contract rate includes a profit component this would also be unallowable to charge to the grant. We also noted the same $30,000 charge was included in US Department of Transportation, Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities, Section 5310. Cause: Paratransit’s internal controls over the determination of allowable costs were not operating effectively. Effect: The DMS costs were removed and replaced with an allowable 10% de minimus overhead charge. Recommendation: We recommend that costs charged to federal grants be reviewed by an individual familiar with the Cost Principles for Nonprofit Organizations contained in 2 CFR, Section 200 as part of the SEFA review process. Management’s Response: See corrective action plan.
2023-001 ALLOWABLE COST, CASH MANAGEMENT, AND PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE - SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY Federal Program Unaccompanied Alien Children Program ALN 93.676 Criteria Part 3 of the Compliance Supplement indicates non-federal entities must minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the US Treasury or pass-through entity and disbursement by the non-federal entity for direct program or project costs and the proportionate share of allowable indirect costs, whether the payment is made by electronic funds transfer, or issuance or redemption of checks, warrants, or payment by other means (2 CFR section 200.305(b)). Part 3 of the Compliance Supplement indicates a non-federal entity may charge only allowable costs incurred during the approved budget period of a federal award’s period of performance and any costs incurred before the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity made the federal award that were authorized by the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity (2 CFR sections 200.308 200.309 and 200.403(h)). A period of performance may contain one or more budget periods. Condition/Cause In July 2022, the Home requested reimbursement and received funding to cover costs that had not yet been incurred or paid for as of June 30, 2023. Effect The Home was reimbursed for costs that were not incurred during the budget period. Additionally, the Home has held onto grant funds for twelve plus months. Questioned Costs Known questioned costs are $52,841. Context The Home budgeted to have new fire alarms installed in the cottages during the July 1, 2021 - June 30, 2022 grant budget period. Due to supply chain issues and labor shortages the alarms were not installed until the Fall of 2023 at which time the Home paid the contractor. Repeat Finding No. Recommendation We recommend the Home contact the funding agency to inquire about returning the funds and any interest earned. We also recommend that the Home revisit and strengthen internal controls over allowable activities, allowable costs, cash management, and period of availability related to grant programs. Management Response See corrective action plan included in this report package.