Reference Number: 2024-011 Prior Year Finding: 2023-020 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services State Agency: Department of Human Services Federal Program: CCDF Cluster, COVID-19 – CCDF Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 93.575, 93.596 Award Number and Year: 2001NJCCC3 (3/27/2020 – 9/30/2023) 2301NJCCDD (10/1/2022 – 9/30/2025) 2301NJCCDF (10/1/2022 – 9/30/2025) 2201NJCCDF (10/1/2021 – 9/30/2024) 2201NJCCDD (10/1/2021 – 9/30/2024) 2101NJCSC6 (10/1/2020 – 9/30/2023) 2101NJCDC6 (10/1/2020 – 9/30/2024) 2101NJCCDF (10/1/2020 – 9/30/2023) 2101NJCCDD (10/1/2023 – 9/30/2025) 2401NJCCDF (10/1/2023 – 9/30/2025) 2401NJCCDM (10/1/2023 – 9/30/2025) Compliance Requirement: Reporting – Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance, Material Non-compliance Criteria or specific requirement: Compliance: Per the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA), prime (direct) recipients of grants or cooperative agreements are required to report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act Subaward Reporting System (FSRS). Reports must be filed in FSRS by the end of the month following the month in which the prime recipient awards any sub-grant greater than or equal to $30,000. If the initial award is below $30,000 but subsequent grant modifications result in a total award equal to or over $30,000, the award will be subject to the reporting requirements as of the date the award exceeds $30,000. If the initial award equals or exceeds $30,000 but funding is subsequently de-obligated such that the total award amount falls below $30,000, the award continues to be subject to FFATA reporting requirements. The following key data elements must be reported: Subawardee Name and Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) number; Amount of Subaward (inclusive of modifications); Subaward Obligation/Action Date; Date of Report Submission; Subaward Number; Project Description; and Names and Compensation of Highly Compensated Officers. (Names and Compensation of Highly Compensated Officers must only be reported when the entity in the preceding fiscal year received 80 percent or more of its annual gross revenues in Federal awards; and $25,000,000 or more in annual gross revenues from Federal awards; and the public does not have access to this information about the compensation of the senior executives of the entity through periodic reports filed under section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §§ 78m(a), 78o(d)) or section 6104 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.) Control: Per 2 CFR section 200.303(a), a non-Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should comply with guidance in “Standards for Section III – Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (Continued) Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition: The Department of Human Services (Department) did not report subaward information to FSRS. Context: Zero of eight subawards selected for testing were reported to FSRS. Total subawards tested were $96,799,274, and $0 was reported as required by FFATA requirements. SEE SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS FOR CHART/TABLE Cause: The Department does not have procedures and controls to ensure that FFATA reporting requirements are met. Effect: Subawards were not reported to FSRS in accordance with FFATA requirements. Questioned costs: None noted. Recommendation: We recommend that the Department develop internal controls and procedures to ensure that FFATA reporting requirements are met. We further recommend the Department develop controls and procedures to ensure that all required subawards are reported accurately and timely to FSRS no later than the end of the month following the month of issuance. Views of responsible officials: The Department of Human Services’ Division of Family Development (DHS/DFD) acknowledges the audit finding regarding the required submission of Subaward to the FFATA Subaward Reporting System (FSRS). One of the primary factors that contributed to non-compliance was system inefficiencies in the FSRS, which led to challenges in tracking, reporting and ensuring data accuracy. With the transition of Subaward reporting from FSRS to sam.gov, the DHS/ DFD expects this change to be beneficial in developing effective internal controls and procedures, addressing past compliance challenges and creating a sustainable reporting framework.
Reference Number: 2024-012 Prior Year Finding: No Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services State Agency: Department of Human Services Federal Program: CCDF Cluster, COVID-19 – CCDF Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 93.575, 93.596 Award Number and Year: 2001NJCCC3 (3/27/2020 – 9/30/2023) 2301NJCCDD (10/1/2022 – 9/30/2025) 2301NJCCDF (10/1/2022 – 9/30/2025) 2201NJCCDF (10/1/2021 – 9/30/2024) 2201NJCCDD (10/1/2021 – 9/30/2024) 2101NJCSC6 (10/1/2020 – 9/30/2023) 2101NJCDC6 (10/1/2020 – 9/30/2024) 2101NJCCDF (10/1/2020 – 9/30/2023) 2101NJCCDD (10/1/2023 – 9/30/2025) 2401NJCCDF (10/1/2023 – 9/30/2025) 2401NJCCDM (10/1/2023 – 9/30/2025) Compliance Requirement: Special Tests and Provisions – Health and Safety Requirements Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Compliance, Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Compliance – As part of their CCDF plans, Lead Agencies must certify that procedures are in effect (e.g., monitoring and enforcement) to ensure that providers serving children who receive subsidies comply with all applicable health and safety requirements. This includes verifying and documenting that child care providers (unless they meet an exception, e.g., family members who are caregivers or individuals who object to immunization on certain grounds) serving children who receive subsidies meet requirements pertaining to health and safety. These requirements must address eleven specific areas—including first aid and CPR, safe sleeping practices, and administration of medication—and child care workers must be trained in these areas (42 USC 9858c(c)(2)(I); 45 CFR section 98.41). Control – Per 2 CFR section 200.303(a), a non-Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition: The Department of Human Services (Department) was not in compliance with health and safety requirements for the program. Context: For 3 of 40 providers selected for testing, the annual health and safety inspection was not performed as required by program policy. Section III – Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (Continued) Questioned costs: Undetermined. Cause: The Department’s procedures were not effective to ensure that provider health and safety inspections were performed as required by program policy. Internal controls did not prevent or detect the errors. Effect: Failure to verify and document compliance with health and safety standards could allow ineligible providers to perform services under the program. Recommendation: The Department should review and enhance internal controls and procedures to ensure that provider health and safety inspections are performed as required by program policy. Views of responsible officials: The Department of Human Services’ Division of Family Development (DHS/DFD) acknowledges the audit finding that 3 of the 40 sampled providers had not been inspected as required by program policy. DHS/DFD contracts with the Department of Children and Families’ Office of Licensing (“OOL”) as the regulatory authority to monitor and inspect licensed centers and family child care providers. In response to this finding, OOL has implemented internal measures to ensure that monitoring occurs on an annual basis. These measure include the use of the New Jersey Child Care Information System (NJCCIS). A subsequent inspection of licensed child care centers was conducted on September 13, 2024. Regarding the two other family child care providers, the Child Care Resource and Referral (“CCR&R”) works in conjunction with OOL to track health and safety inspections. However, CCR&R did not monitor the two family child care providers in 2023. Since then, monitoring has been carried out in 2024 which included a review of the annual training requirements for these providers. To enhance compliance with inspections, CCR&R has acquired updated software to improve its monitoring capabilities. Copies of the 2024 inspection reports can be provided upon request. The DFD’s Office of Child Care will develop internal controls and procedures to ensure that inspections are performed as required by program policy.
Reference Number: 2024-012 Prior Year Finding: No Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services State Agency: Department of Human Services Federal Program: CCDF Cluster, COVID-19 – CCDF Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 93.575, 93.596 Award Number and Year: 2001NJCCC3 (3/27/2020 – 9/30/2023) 2301NJCCDD (10/1/2022 – 9/30/2025) 2301NJCCDF (10/1/2022 – 9/30/2025) 2201NJCCDF (10/1/2021 – 9/30/2024) 2201NJCCDD (10/1/2021 – 9/30/2024) 2101NJCSC6 (10/1/2020 – 9/30/2023) 2101NJCDC6 (10/1/2020 – 9/30/2024) 2101NJCCDF (10/1/2020 – 9/30/2023) 2101NJCCDD (10/1/2023 – 9/30/2025) 2401NJCCDF (10/1/2023 – 9/30/2025) 2401NJCCDM (10/1/2023 – 9/30/2025) Compliance Requirement: Special Tests and Provisions – Health and Safety Requirements Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Compliance, Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Compliance – As part of their CCDF plans, Lead Agencies must certify that procedures are in effect (e.g., monitoring and enforcement) to ensure that providers serving children who receive subsidies comply with all applicable health and safety requirements. This includes verifying and documenting that child care providers (unless they meet an exception, e.g., family members who are caregivers or individuals who object to immunization on certain grounds) serving children who receive subsidies meet requirements pertaining to health and safety. These requirements must address eleven specific areas—including first aid and CPR, safe sleeping practices, and administration of medication—and child care workers must be trained in these areas (42 USC 9858c(c)(2)(I); 45 CFR section 98.41). Control – Per 2 CFR section 200.303(a), a non-Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition: The Department of Human Services (Department) was not in compliance with health and safety requirements for the program. Context: For 3 of 40 providers selected for testing, the annual health and safety inspection was not performed as required by program policy. Section III – Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (Continued) Questioned costs: Undetermined. Cause: The Department’s procedures were not effective to ensure that provider health and safety inspections were performed as required by program policy. Internal controls did not prevent or detect the errors. Effect: Failure to verify and document compliance with health and safety standards could allow ineligible providers to perform services under the program. Recommendation: The Department should review and enhance internal controls and procedures to ensure that provider health and safety inspections are performed as required by program policy. Views of responsible officials: The Department of Human Services’ Division of Family Development (DHS/DFD) acknowledges the audit finding that 3 of the 40 sampled providers had not been inspected as required by program policy. DHS/DFD contracts with the Department of Children and Families’ Office of Licensing (“OOL”) as the regulatory authority to monitor and inspect licensed centers and family child care providers. In response to this finding, OOL has implemented internal measures to ensure that monitoring occurs on an annual basis. These measure include the use of the New Jersey Child Care Information System (NJCCIS). A subsequent inspection of licensed child care centers was conducted on September 13, 2024. Regarding the two other family child care providers, the Child Care Resource and Referral (“CCR&R”) works in conjunction with OOL to track health and safety inspections. However, CCR&R did not monitor the two family child care providers in 2023. Since then, monitoring has been carried out in 2024 which included a review of the annual training requirements for these providers. To enhance compliance with inspections, CCR&R has acquired updated software to improve its monitoring capabilities. Copies of the 2024 inspection reports can be provided upon request. The DFD’s Office of Child Care will develop internal controls and procedures to ensure that inspections are performed as required by program policy.
Reference Number: 2024-012 Prior Year Finding: No Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services State Agency: Department of Human Services Federal Program: CCDF Cluster, COVID-19 – CCDF Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 93.575, 93.596 Award Number and Year: 2001NJCCC3 (3/27/2020 – 9/30/2023) 2301NJCCDD (10/1/2022 – 9/30/2025) 2301NJCCDF (10/1/2022 – 9/30/2025) 2201NJCCDF (10/1/2021 – 9/30/2024) 2201NJCCDD (10/1/2021 – 9/30/2024) 2101NJCSC6 (10/1/2020 – 9/30/2023) 2101NJCDC6 (10/1/2020 – 9/30/2024) 2101NJCCDF (10/1/2020 – 9/30/2023) 2101NJCCDD (10/1/2023 – 9/30/2025) 2401NJCCDF (10/1/2023 – 9/30/2025) 2401NJCCDM (10/1/2023 – 9/30/2025) Compliance Requirement: Special Tests and Provisions – Health and Safety Requirements Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Compliance, Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Compliance – As part of their CCDF plans, Lead Agencies must certify that procedures are in effect (e.g., monitoring and enforcement) to ensure that providers serving children who receive subsidies comply with all applicable health and safety requirements. This includes verifying and documenting that child care providers (unless they meet an exception, e.g., family members who are caregivers or individuals who object to immunization on certain grounds) serving children who receive subsidies meet requirements pertaining to health and safety. These requirements must address eleven specific areas—including first aid and CPR, safe sleeping practices, and administration of medication—and child care workers must be trained in these areas (42 USC 9858c(c)(2)(I); 45 CFR section 98.41). Control – Per 2 CFR section 200.303(a), a non-Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition: The Department of Human Services (Department) was not in compliance with health and safety requirements for the program. Context: For 3 of 40 providers selected for testing, the annual health and safety inspection was not performed as required by program policy. Section III – Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (Continued) Questioned costs: Undetermined. Cause: The Department’s procedures were not effective to ensure that provider health and safety inspections were performed as required by program policy. Internal controls did not prevent or detect the errors. Effect: Failure to verify and document compliance with health and safety standards could allow ineligible providers to perform services under the program. Recommendation: The Department should review and enhance internal controls and procedures to ensure that provider health and safety inspections are performed as required by program policy. Views of responsible officials: The Department of Human Services’ Division of Family Development (DHS/DFD) acknowledges the audit finding that 3 of the 40 sampled providers had not been inspected as required by program policy. DHS/DFD contracts with the Department of Children and Families’ Office of Licensing (“OOL”) as the regulatory authority to monitor and inspect licensed centers and family child care providers. In response to this finding, OOL has implemented internal measures to ensure that monitoring occurs on an annual basis. These measure include the use of the New Jersey Child Care Information System (NJCCIS). A subsequent inspection of licensed child care centers was conducted on September 13, 2024. Regarding the two other family child care providers, the Child Care Resource and Referral (“CCR&R”) works in conjunction with OOL to track health and safety inspections. However, CCR&R did not monitor the two family child care providers in 2023. Since then, monitoring has been carried out in 2024 which included a review of the annual training requirements for these providers. To enhance compliance with inspections, CCR&R has acquired updated software to improve its monitoring capabilities. Copies of the 2024 inspection reports can be provided upon request. The DFD’s Office of Child Care will develop internal controls and procedures to ensure that inspections are performed as required by program policy.
Reference Number: 2024-013 Prior Year Finding: 2023-024 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services State Agency: Department of Human Services Federal Program: Opioid STR Assistance Listing Number: 93.788 Award Number and Year: H79T1083317 (9/3/2020 – 9/29/2023), H79T1085743 (9/30/2022 – 9/29/2024) Compliance Requirement: Reporting – Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance, Material Non-compliance Criteria or specific requirement: Compliance: Per the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA), prime (direct) recipients of grants or cooperative agreements are required to report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act Subaward Reporting System (FSRS). Reports must be filed in FSRS by the end of the month following the month in which the prime recipient awards any sub-grant greater than or equal to $30,000. If the initial award is below $30,000 but subsequent grant modifications result in a total award equal to or over $30,000, the award will be subject to the reporting requirements as of the date the award exceeds $30,000. If the initial award equals or exceeds $30,000 but funding is subsequently de-obligated such that the total award amount falls below $30,000, the award continues to be subject to FFATA reporting requirements. The following key data elements must be reported: Subawardee Name and Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) number; Amount of Subaward (inclusive of modifications); Subaward Obligation/Action Date; Date of Report Submission; Subaward Number; Project Description; and Names and Compensation of Highly Compensated Officers. (Names and Compensation of Highly Compensated Officers must only be reported when the entity in the preceding fiscal year received 80 percent or more of its annual gross revenues in Federal awards; and $25,000,000 or more in annual gross revenues from Federal awards; and the public does not have access to this information about the compensation of the senior executives of the entity through periodic reports filed under section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §§ 78m(a), 78o(d)) or section 6104 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.) Control: Per 2 CFR section 200.303(a), a non-Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should comply with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition: The Department of Human Services (Department) did not timely report subaward information to FSRS during FY 2024. Section III – Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (Continued) Context: Twelve subaward transactions were selected for testing during FY 2024. The twelve subawards were not reported to FSRS timely. The subawards were not reported to FSRS until January and February 2025, but the subawards were issued during August – October 2023. SEE SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS FOR CHART/TABLE Cause: The Department did not establish effective procedures and controls to ensure subawards were reported to FSRS. Effect: Subawards were not reported to FSRS in accordance with FFATA requirements. Questioned costs: None noted. Recommendation: We recommend that the Department develop internal controls and procedures to ensure that FFATA reporting requirements are met. We further recommend the Department develop controls and procedures to ensure that all required subawards are reported accurately and timely to FSRS no later than the end of the month following the month of issuance. Views of responsible officials: The Department of Human Services, Division of Mental Health and Addiction Services (DMHAS) agrees that for fiscal year 2024 it did not complete Federal Funding Accountability & Transparency Act (FFATA) uploads timely. DMHAS maintains written FFATA policies and procedures, and it is compliant with its SSA SFY 2023 Corrective Action Plan (CAP) which included a January 1, 2025 implementation date. However, DMHAS was unable to comply timely with the FFATA reporting requirements due to competing reporting requirements, in conjunction with the volume of data and effort required. In addition to the significant progress DMHAS reported in the FY 2023 CAP update provided below, DMHAS accomplished the following: On October 21, 2024, DMHAS on boarded a full-time FFATA Analyst dedicated to FFATA data collection and uploads. On October 23 and October 29, 2024, DMHAS conducted training for the FFATA analyst. On or about January 29, 2025 and February 3, 2025, in an effort to demonstrate its proficiency and show its good faith efforts to comply, DMHAS uploaded all SUPTRS SFY23 and SFY24 Test Contracts (FAIN ending 5822) for the SSA SFY 2024. On or about February 3, 2025 and February 19, 2025, in an effort to demonstrate its proficiency and show its good faith efforts to comply, DMHAS uploaded all SOR SFY23 and SFY24 (FAIN ending 5743) Test Contracts for the SSA SFY24. Thereafter, DMHAS completed the following uploads: • February 27, 2025 – SOR FAIN ending 5743 – remaining contracts (outside of the SSA24 Test group) up to the FSRS ceiling (which limits data entry to forty (40) pages and UEIs. • March 4, 2025 – SUPTRS FAIN ending 7054 – all contracts uploaded. • March 6, 2025 – SOR FAIN ending 7774 – all contracts (into FSRS prior to migration) • March 6, 2025 – SUPTRS FAIN ending 5822 - remaining contracts (outside of the SSA24 Test group) up to the FSRS ceiling (which limits data entry to forty (40) pages and UEIs. On January 22, 2025, the DMHAS Compliance Quality Assurance Specialist who helps monitor FFATA compliance completed the federal SAM.gov training. On March 5, 2025, the DMHAS FFATA Analyst completed the federal SAM.gov training. DMHAS remains committed to FFATA compliance, is prioritizing FFATA reporting, and is making a good faith effort to comply. However, DMHAS notes various federal issues outside of the State’s control that are causing delays and increasing administrative burden. More specifically, uploads that predated the conversion from FSRS to Sam.gov were limited by a system error so DMHAS was precluded from entering all contracts/UEIs. In addition, FAINs are missing from SAM.gov, thus precluding the submission of the corresponding uploads. DMHAS is documenting the upload limitations and missing FAINs, along with its continued efforts to overcome the various obstacles outside of its control.
Reference Number: 2024-014 Prior Year Finding: 2023-025 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services State Agency: Department of Human Services Federal Program: Opioid STR Assistance Listing Number: 93.788 Award Number and Year: H79T1083317 (9/3/2020 – 9/29/2023), H79T1085743 (9/30/2022 – 9/29/2024) Compliance Requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Compliance, Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Compliance – Per 2 CFR section 200.332(a), all pass-through entities must ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes information at the time of the subaward and if any of these data elements change, include the changes in subsequent subaward modification. When some of this information is not available, the pass-through entity must provide the best information available to describe the Federal award and subaward. Control – Per 2 CFR section 200.303(a), a non-Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition: The Department of Human Services (Department) did not include all required information in subaward agreements. Context: For 1 of 13 subawards selected for testing, the subrecipient’s unique identifier and the Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN) were omitted from the subaward agreement. Questioned costs: None noted. Cause: The Department’s procedures were not effective to ensure that subawards were issued in compliance with Federal requirements. Internal controls did not prevent or detect the errors. Effect: Excluding the required federal grant award information at the time of the subaward may cause subrecipients and their auditors to be uninformed about specific program and other regulations that apply to the funds they receive. There is also the potential for subrecipients to have incomplete Schedules of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) in their Single Audit reports, and federal funds may not be properly audited at the subrecipient level in accordance with the Uniform Guidance. Recommendation: The Department should review and enhance internal controls and procedures to ensure that all required information is included in subaward agreements. Views of responsible officials: DMHAS acknowledges that the FAIN was omitted in a single notice of sub recipient award that predates the implementation date of its FY 2023 Corrective Action Plan (CAP). The award at issue relates to a “special County” add-on contract (one (1) of a total of nineteen (19)) that is tracked manually and in the DMHAS Contract Information Management System (CIMS) on which it currently relies to relay the data components required by 2 CFR 200.332. The single omission of the FAIN was due to a clerical error, whereby CIMS was not updated consistent with the manual record of the 2024 County contract renewal. DMHAS acknowledged in its FY 2023 CAP that CIMS was being replaced with SAGE in order to automate sub recipient notices, reduce administrative burden and decrease clerical errors that result from manual data entry. DMHAS notes that the original 2025 SAGE go-live date has been delayed and moved to Summer 2026. Therefore, DMHAS made improvements to CIMS (that is available to Providers). In addition to identifying the federal funding source in the program column and in the notes, CIMS now includes a federal drop down box that links the federal NOAs to the subrecipient agreement. DMHAS is compliant with its FY 2023 CAP which included a July 1, 2024 implementation date. Beginning July 1, 2024, DMHAS starting using a new Subaward template that includes the requisite data elements. DMHAS created a contract policy update and completed template trainings in-person and remotely. The DMHAS Compliance Unit audited the use of the new template to ensure Subaward include the requisite data elements.
Reference Number: 2024-015 Prior Year Finding: 2023-026 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services State Agency: Department of Human Services Federal Program: Block Grants for Prevention and Treatment of Substance Abuse, COVID-19 – Block Grants for Prevention and Treatment of Substance Abuse Assistance Listing Number: 93.959 Award Number and Year: 6B08TI084660 (10/1/2021 – 9/30/2024), 6B08TI085822 (10/1/2022 – 9/30/2024), 1B08TI087054 (10/1/2023 – 9/30/2025) Compliance Requirement: Reporting – Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance, Material Noncompliance Criteria or specific requirement: Compliance: Per the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA), prime (direct) recipients of grants or cooperative agreements are required to report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act Subaward Reporting System (FSRS). Reports must be filed in FSRS by the end of the month following the month in which the prime recipient awards any sub-grant greater than or equal to $30,000. If the initial award is below $30,000 but subsequent grant modifications result in a total award equal to or over $30,000, the award will be subject to the reporting requirements as of the date the award exceeds $30,000. If the initial award equals or exceeds $30,000 but funding is subsequently de-obligated such that the total award amount falls below $30,000, the award continues to be subject to FFATA reporting requirements. The following key data elements must be reported: Subawardee Name and Unique Entity ID (UEI) number; Amount of Subaward (inclusive of modifications); Subaward Obligation/Action Date; Date of Report Submission; Subaward Number; Project Description; and Names and Compensation of Highly Compensated Officers. (Names and Compensation of Highly Compensated Officers must only be reported when the entity in the preceding fiscal year received 80 percent or more of its annual gross revenues in Federal awards; and $25,000,000 or more in annual gross revenues from Federal awards; and the public does not have access to this information about the compensation of the senior executives of the entity through periodic reports filed under section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §§ 78m(a), 78o(d)) or section 6104 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.) Control: Per 2 CFR section 200.303(a), a non-Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should comply with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition: The Department of Health (Department) did not timely report subaward information to FSRS during FY2024. Context: Twelve subaward transactions were selected for testing during FY 2024. The twelve subawards were not reported to FSRS timely. The subawards were not reported to FSRS until February 2025, but the subawards were issued during July 2022 – January 2024. SEE SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS FOR CHART/TABLE Cause: The Department did not establish effective procedures and controls to ensure that subawards were reported to FSRS. Effect: Subawards were not reported to FSRS in accordance with FFATA requirements. Questioned costs: None noted. Recommendation: We recommend that the Department develop procedures and internal controls to ensure that all required subawards are reported to FSRS no later than the end of the month following the month of issuance in accordance with FFATA reporting requirements. Views of responsible officials: The Department of Human Services, Division of Mental Health and Addiction Services (DMHAS) agrees that for fiscal year 2024 it did not complete Federal Funding Accountability & Transparency Act (FFATA) uploads timely. DMHAS maintains written FFATA policies and procedures, and it is compliant with its SSA SFY 2023 Corrective Action Plan (CAP) which included a January 1, 2025 implementation date. However, DMHAS was unable to comply timely with the FFATA reporting requirements due to competing reporting requirements, in conjunction with the volume of data and effort required. In addition to the significant progress DMHAS reported in the FY 2023 CAP update provided below, DMHAS accomplished the following: On October 21, 2024, DMHAS on boarded a full-time FFATA Analyst dedicated to FFATA data collection and uploads. On October 23 and October 29, 2024, DMHAS conducted training for the FFATA analyst. On or about January 29, 2025 and February 3, 2025, in an effort to demonstrate its proficiency and show its good faith efforts to comply, DMHAS uploaded all SUPTRS SFY23 and SFY24 Test Contracts (FAIN ending 5822) for the SSA SFY 2024. On or about February 3, 2025 and February 19, 2025, in an effort to demonstrate its proficiency and show its good faith efforts to comply, DMHAS uploaded all SOR SFY23 and SFY24 (FAIN ending 5743) Test Contracts for the SSA SFY24. Thereafter, DMHAS completed the following uploads: • February 27, 2025 – SOR FAIN ending 5743 – remaining contracts (outside of the SSA24 Test group) up to the FSRS ceiling (which limits data entry to forty (40) pages and UEIs. • March 4, 2025 – SUPTRS FAIN ending 7054 – all contracts uploaded. • March 6, 2025 – SOR FAIN ending 7774 – all contracts (into FSRS prior to migration) • March 6, 2025 – SUPTRS FAIN ending 5822 - remaining contracts (outside of the SSA24 Test group) up to the FSRS ceiling (which limits data entry to forty (40) pages and UEIs. On January 22, 2025, the DMHAS Compliance Quality Assurance Specialist who helps monitor FFATA compliance completed the federal SAM.gov training. On March 5, 2025, the DMHAS FFATA Analyst completed the federal SAM.gov training. DMHAS remains committed to FFATA compliance, is prioritizing FFATA reporting, and is making a good faith effort to comply. However, DMHAS notes various federal issues outside of the State’s control that are causing delays and increasing administrative burden. More specifically, uploads that predated the conversion from FSRS to Sam.gov were limited by a system error so DMHAS was precluded from entering all contracts/UEIs. In addition, FAINs are missing from SAM.gov, thus precluding the submission of the corresponding uploads. DMHAS is documenting the upload limitations and missing FAINs, along with its continued efforts to overcome the various obstacles outside of its control.
Reference Number: 2024-015 Prior Year Finding: 2023-026 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services State Agency: Department of Human Services Federal Program: Block Grants for Prevention and Treatment of Substance Abuse, COVID-19 – Block Grants for Prevention and Treatment of Substance Abuse Assistance Listing Number: 93.959 Award Number and Year: 6B08TI084660 (10/1/2021 – 9/30/2024), 6B08TI085822 (10/1/2022 – 9/30/2024), 1B08TI087054 (10/1/2023 – 9/30/2025) Compliance Requirement: Reporting – Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance, Material Noncompliance Criteria or specific requirement: Compliance: Per the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA), prime (direct) recipients of grants or cooperative agreements are required to report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act Subaward Reporting System (FSRS). Reports must be filed in FSRS by the end of the month following the month in which the prime recipient awards any sub-grant greater than or equal to $30,000. If the initial award is below $30,000 but subsequent grant modifications result in a total award equal to or over $30,000, the award will be subject to the reporting requirements as of the date the award exceeds $30,000. If the initial award equals or exceeds $30,000 but funding is subsequently de-obligated such that the total award amount falls below $30,000, the award continues to be subject to FFATA reporting requirements. The following key data elements must be reported: Subawardee Name and Unique Entity ID (UEI) number; Amount of Subaward (inclusive of modifications); Subaward Obligation/Action Date; Date of Report Submission; Subaward Number; Project Description; and Names and Compensation of Highly Compensated Officers. (Names and Compensation of Highly Compensated Officers must only be reported when the entity in the preceding fiscal year received 80 percent or more of its annual gross revenues in Federal awards; and $25,000,000 or more in annual gross revenues from Federal awards; and the public does not have access to this information about the compensation of the senior executives of the entity through periodic reports filed under section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §§ 78m(a), 78o(d)) or section 6104 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.) Control: Per 2 CFR section 200.303(a), a non-Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should comply with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition: The Department of Health (Department) did not timely report subaward information to FSRS during FY2024. Context: Twelve subaward transactions were selected for testing during FY 2024. The twelve subawards were not reported to FSRS timely. The subawards were not reported to FSRS until February 2025, but the subawards were issued during July 2022 – January 2024. SEE SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS FOR CHART/TABLE Cause: The Department did not establish effective procedures and controls to ensure that subawards were reported to FSRS. Effect: Subawards were not reported to FSRS in accordance with FFATA requirements. Questioned costs: None noted. Recommendation: We recommend that the Department develop procedures and internal controls to ensure that all required subawards are reported to FSRS no later than the end of the month following the month of issuance in accordance with FFATA reporting requirements. Views of responsible officials: The Department of Human Services, Division of Mental Health and Addiction Services (DMHAS) agrees that for fiscal year 2024 it did not complete Federal Funding Accountability & Transparency Act (FFATA) uploads timely. DMHAS maintains written FFATA policies and procedures, and it is compliant with its SSA SFY 2023 Corrective Action Plan (CAP) which included a January 1, 2025 implementation date. However, DMHAS was unable to comply timely with the FFATA reporting requirements due to competing reporting requirements, in conjunction with the volume of data and effort required. In addition to the significant progress DMHAS reported in the FY 2023 CAP update provided below, DMHAS accomplished the following: On October 21, 2024, DMHAS on boarded a full-time FFATA Analyst dedicated to FFATA data collection and uploads. On October 23 and October 29, 2024, DMHAS conducted training for the FFATA analyst. On or about January 29, 2025 and February 3, 2025, in an effort to demonstrate its proficiency and show its good faith efforts to comply, DMHAS uploaded all SUPTRS SFY23 and SFY24 Test Contracts (FAIN ending 5822) for the SSA SFY 2024. On or about February 3, 2025 and February 19, 2025, in an effort to demonstrate its proficiency and show its good faith efforts to comply, DMHAS uploaded all SOR SFY23 and SFY24 (FAIN ending 5743) Test Contracts for the SSA SFY24. Thereafter, DMHAS completed the following uploads: • February 27, 2025 – SOR FAIN ending 5743 – remaining contracts (outside of the SSA24 Test group) up to the FSRS ceiling (which limits data entry to forty (40) pages and UEIs. • March 4, 2025 – SUPTRS FAIN ending 7054 – all contracts uploaded. • March 6, 2025 – SOR FAIN ending 7774 – all contracts (into FSRS prior to migration) • March 6, 2025 – SUPTRS FAIN ending 5822 - remaining contracts (outside of the SSA24 Test group) up to the FSRS ceiling (which limits data entry to forty (40) pages and UEIs. On January 22, 2025, the DMHAS Compliance Quality Assurance Specialist who helps monitor FFATA compliance completed the federal SAM.gov training. On March 5, 2025, the DMHAS FFATA Analyst completed the federal SAM.gov training. DMHAS remains committed to FFATA compliance, is prioritizing FFATA reporting, and is making a good faith effort to comply. However, DMHAS notes various federal issues outside of the State’s control that are causing delays and increasing administrative burden. More specifically, uploads that predated the conversion from FSRS to Sam.gov were limited by a system error so DMHAS was precluded from entering all contracts/UEIs. In addition, FAINs are missing from SAM.gov, thus precluding the submission of the corresponding uploads. DMHAS is documenting the upload limitations and missing FAINs, along with its continued efforts to overcome the various obstacles outside of its control.
Reference Number: 2024-016 Prior Year Finding: 2023-028 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Homeland Security State Agency: Department of Law and Public Safety Federal Program: Disaster Grants - Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters) Assistance Listing Number: 97.036 Award Number and Year: 066124021PA: 8/31/11; 066224614PA: 9/5/21; 066214597PA: 4/28/21; 066214574PA: 12/11/20; 066204488PA: 3/13/20; 066134086PA: 10/30/12 066244725PA: 8/11/2023 Compliance Requirement: Reporting – Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance, Material Non-compliance Criteria or specific requirement: Compliance: Per the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA), prime (direct) recipients of grants or cooperative agreements are required to report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act Subaward Reporting System (FSRS). Reports must be filed in FSRS by the end of the month following the month in which the prime recipient awards any sub-grant greater than or equal to $30,000. If the initial award is below $30,000 but subsequent grant modifications result in a total award equal to or over $30,000, the award will be subject to the reporting requirements as of the date the award exceeds $30,000. If the initial award equals or exceeds $30,000 but funding is subsequently de-obligated such that the total award amount falls below $30,000, the award continues to be subject to FFATA reporting requirements. The following key data elements must be reported: Subawardee Name and Unique Entity ID (UEI) number; Amount of Subaward (inclusive of modifications); Subaward Obligation/Action Date; Date of Report Submission; Subaward Number; Project Description; and Names and Compensation of Highly Compensated Officers. (Names and Compensation of Highly Compensated Officers must only be reported when the entity in the preceding fiscal year received 80 percent or more of its annual gross revenues in Federal awards; and $25,000,000 or more in annual gross revenues from Federal awards; and the public does not have access to this information about the compensation of the senior executives of the entity through periodic reports filed under section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §§ 78m(a), 78o(d)) or section 6104 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.) Control: Per 2 CFR section 200.303(a), a non-Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should comply with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Section III – Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (Continued) Condition: The Department of Law and Public Safety (Department) did not report subaward information timely to FSRS. Context: Sixty subawards were selected for testing and the following exceptions were noted: • 23 of 60 subawards selected for testing were not reported to FSRS as of FY2024. • 37 of 60 subawards selected for testing were not reported to FSRS on a timely basis. SEE SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS FOR CHART/TABLE Cause: The Department has not fully implemented its corrective action plan from the prior audit. Its procedures and internal controls are not sufficient to ensure that subawards are reported to FSRS on a timely basis. Effect: Subawards were not reported to FSRS in accordance with FFATA requirements. Questioned costs: None noted. Recommendation: We recommend that the Department complete implementation of its corrective action plan from the prior audit and ensure all subawards are reported to FSRS. It should develop procedures and internal controls to ensure that all required subawards are reported to FSRS no later than the end of the month following the month of issuance in accordance with FFATA reporting requirements. Views of responsible officials: The Department has completed its corrective action plan from the prior audit. DLPS has been in full compliance with the FFATA reporting requirement since August 2024.
Reference Number: 2024-016 Prior Year Finding: 2023-028 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Homeland Security State Agency: Department of Law and Public Safety Federal Program: Disaster Grants - Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters) Assistance Listing Number: 97.036 Award Number and Year: 066124021PA: 8/31/11; 066224614PA: 9/5/21; 066214597PA: 4/28/21; 066214574PA: 12/11/20; 066204488PA: 3/13/20; 066134086PA: 10/30/12 066244725PA: 8/11/2023 Compliance Requirement: Reporting – Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance, Material Non-compliance Criteria or specific requirement: Compliance: Per the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA), prime (direct) recipients of grants or cooperative agreements are required to report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act Subaward Reporting System (FSRS). Reports must be filed in FSRS by the end of the month following the month in which the prime recipient awards any sub-grant greater than or equal to $30,000. If the initial award is below $30,000 but subsequent grant modifications result in a total award equal to or over $30,000, the award will be subject to the reporting requirements as of the date the award exceeds $30,000. If the initial award equals or exceeds $30,000 but funding is subsequently de-obligated such that the total award amount falls below $30,000, the award continues to be subject to FFATA reporting requirements. The following key data elements must be reported: Subawardee Name and Unique Entity ID (UEI) number; Amount of Subaward (inclusive of modifications); Subaward Obligation/Action Date; Date of Report Submission; Subaward Number; Project Description; and Names and Compensation of Highly Compensated Officers. (Names and Compensation of Highly Compensated Officers must only be reported when the entity in the preceding fiscal year received 80 percent or more of its annual gross revenues in Federal awards; and $25,000,000 or more in annual gross revenues from Federal awards; and the public does not have access to this information about the compensation of the senior executives of the entity through periodic reports filed under section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §§ 78m(a), 78o(d)) or section 6104 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.) Control: Per 2 CFR section 200.303(a), a non-Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should comply with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Section III – Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (Continued) Condition: The Department of Law and Public Safety (Department) did not report subaward information timely to FSRS. Context: Sixty subawards were selected for testing and the following exceptions were noted: • 23 of 60 subawards selected for testing were not reported to FSRS as of FY2024. • 37 of 60 subawards selected for testing were not reported to FSRS on a timely basis. SEE SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS FOR CHART/TABLE Cause: The Department has not fully implemented its corrective action plan from the prior audit. Its procedures and internal controls are not sufficient to ensure that subawards are reported to FSRS on a timely basis. Effect: Subawards were not reported to FSRS in accordance with FFATA requirements. Questioned costs: None noted. Recommendation: We recommend that the Department complete implementation of its corrective action plan from the prior audit and ensure all subawards are reported to FSRS. It should develop procedures and internal controls to ensure that all required subawards are reported to FSRS no later than the end of the month following the month of issuance in accordance with FFATA reporting requirements. Views of responsible officials: The Department has completed its corrective action plan from the prior audit. DLPS has been in full compliance with the FFATA reporting requirement since August 2024.
Finding Number: 2024-001 Program: Student Financial Assistance Cluster ALN #: 84.063 and 84.268 Pass-through Entity: N/A- Direct Award Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Federal Award Year: July 1, 2023 through June 30, 2024 Compliance Requirement: Enrollment Reporting Type of Finding: Material Weakness and Material Noncompliance Criteria Institutions are required to report enrollment information under the Pell grant and the Direct and FFEL loan programs via the NSLDS (OMB No. 1845-0035), although FFEL loans are no longer made or a part of the SFA Cluster, a student may have a FFEL loan from previous years that would require enrollment reporting for that student (Pell, 34 CFR 690.83(b)(2); FFEL, 34 CFR 682.610; Direct Loan, 34 CFR 685.309; Perkins 34 CFR 674.19(f)). The administration of the Title IV programs depends heavily on the accuracy and timeliness of the enrollment information reported by institutions. Institutions must review, update, and certify student enrollment statuses, program information, and effective dates that appear on the Enrollment Reporting Roster file or on the Enrollment Maintenance page of the NSLDS Professional Access (NSLDSFAP) website which the financial aid administrator can access for the auditor. The data on the institution’s Enrollment Reporting Roster, or Enrollment Maintenance page, is what NSLDS has as the most recently certified enrollment. There are two categories of enrollment information, “Campus Level” and “Program Level,” both of which need to be reported accurately and have separate record types. The NSLDS Enrollment Reporting Guide provides the requirements and guidance for reporting enrollment details using the NSLDS Enrollment Reporting Process. Institutions are responsible for accurately reporting all Campus-Level Record data elements. At a minimum, institutions are required to certify enrollment every 60 days or every other month. Additionally, per 2 CFR section 200.303, non-federal entities must establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provide reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the federal award Conditions found During our testwork over student enrollment reporting, we noted that the College did not report all changes to students’ status within the required 60 days. For 4 out of 40 students selected for enrollment reporting compliance testing, the College did not transmit the students’ status changes within the next NSLDS transmission after the school became aware of the change. The status changes for these four students were reported between 79 and 138 days after the College became aware of the students’ withdrawal. Additionally, while the College has controls in place to ensure that enrollment changes are reported within the 60 days required, the control does not ensure that the school is capturing changes for all students. Cause For one student noted above, Management communicated to us that it was an oversight as this student was already enrolled in the College’s graduate program. For the other three, Management communicated to us that transmission reports that are submitted during the summer months do not account for students who withdraw from the College at the end of the spring semester. These changes were not reported to NSLDS until the following fall semester when the student does not return. For the reasons noted above, we determined the related control in place at the College, which is supposed to address the completeness of the transmission reports, does not operate at a precise enough level to ensure that the reports include all student status changes that have occurred since the prior transmission. Proper perspective The College’s policy is to run a report from the Colleague system and submit it to NSLDS for any student status changes. Out of an initial sample of 40 students who had status changes, we identified four students’ whose status changes were not reported within 60 days. Upon further review by Management, there was a total of 65 students who withdrew or took a leave of absence after the 2024 spring semester. Of these 65 students, the College did not communicate the status change for 32 of them within the required 60 days. The status change for these 32 students, including the four noted above, were reported between 79 and 248 days after the College became aware of the students’ withdrawal or leave of absence. Possible asserted effect Untimely submission of student enrollment status information affects the determinations that lenders and servicers of students’ loans make related to in-school status, deferments, grace periods, and repayment schedules, as well as the federal government’s payment of interest subsidies. Questioned costs None noted. Statistical sampling The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat finding A similar finding was not reported in the prior year. Recommendation We recommend that the College implement additional controls to ensure the completeness of the transmission reports before sending to NSLDS. Additionally, students who communicate to the University that they are withdrawing should have their status changed in the Colleague system and therefore be included on the next transmission report. View of responsible officials Between the conclusion of the spring term and the start of the fall term, the College reported summer enrollments. However, withdrawals from students who were not enrolled in summer terms were mistakenly held until the initial fall term reporting file.
Finding Number: 2024-001 Program: Student Financial Assistance Cluster ALN #: 84.063 and 84.268 Pass-through Entity: N/A- Direct Award Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Federal Award Year: July 1, 2023 through June 30, 2024 Compliance Requirement: Enrollment Reporting Type of Finding: Material Weakness and Material Noncompliance Criteria Institutions are required to report enrollment information under the Pell grant and the Direct and FFEL loan programs via the NSLDS (OMB No. 1845-0035), although FFEL loans are no longer made or a part of the SFA Cluster, a student may have a FFEL loan from previous years that would require enrollment reporting for that student (Pell, 34 CFR 690.83(b)(2); FFEL, 34 CFR 682.610; Direct Loan, 34 CFR 685.309; Perkins 34 CFR 674.19(f)). The administration of the Title IV programs depends heavily on the accuracy and timeliness of the enrollment information reported by institutions. Institutions must review, update, and certify student enrollment statuses, program information, and effective dates that appear on the Enrollment Reporting Roster file or on the Enrollment Maintenance page of the NSLDS Professional Access (NSLDSFAP) website which the financial aid administrator can access for the auditor. The data on the institution’s Enrollment Reporting Roster, or Enrollment Maintenance page, is what NSLDS has as the most recently certified enrollment. There are two categories of enrollment information, “Campus Level” and “Program Level,” both of which need to be reported accurately and have separate record types. The NSLDS Enrollment Reporting Guide provides the requirements and guidance for reporting enrollment details using the NSLDS Enrollment Reporting Process. Institutions are responsible for accurately reporting all Campus-Level Record data elements. At a minimum, institutions are required to certify enrollment every 60 days or every other month. Additionally, per 2 CFR section 200.303, non-federal entities must establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provide reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the federal award Conditions found During our testwork over student enrollment reporting, we noted that the College did not report all changes to students’ status within the required 60 days. For 4 out of 40 students selected for enrollment reporting compliance testing, the College did not transmit the students’ status changes within the next NSLDS transmission after the school became aware of the change. The status changes for these four students were reported between 79 and 138 days after the College became aware of the students’ withdrawal. Additionally, while the College has controls in place to ensure that enrollment changes are reported within the 60 days required, the control does not ensure that the school is capturing changes for all students. Cause For one student noted above, Management communicated to us that it was an oversight as this student was already enrolled in the College’s graduate program. For the other three, Management communicated to us that transmission reports that are submitted during the summer months do not account for students who withdraw from the College at the end of the spring semester. These changes were not reported to NSLDS until the following fall semester when the student does not return. For the reasons noted above, we determined the related control in place at the College, which is supposed to address the completeness of the transmission reports, does not operate at a precise enough level to ensure that the reports include all student status changes that have occurred since the prior transmission. Proper perspective The College’s policy is to run a report from the Colleague system and submit it to NSLDS for any student status changes. Out of an initial sample of 40 students who had status changes, we identified four students’ whose status changes were not reported within 60 days. Upon further review by Management, there was a total of 65 students who withdrew or took a leave of absence after the 2024 spring semester. Of these 65 students, the College did not communicate the status change for 32 of them within the required 60 days. The status change for these 32 students, including the four noted above, were reported between 79 and 248 days after the College became aware of the students’ withdrawal or leave of absence. Possible asserted effect Untimely submission of student enrollment status information affects the determinations that lenders and servicers of students’ loans make related to in-school status, deferments, grace periods, and repayment schedules, as well as the federal government’s payment of interest subsidies. Questioned costs None noted. Statistical sampling The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat finding A similar finding was not reported in the prior year. Recommendation We recommend that the College implement additional controls to ensure the completeness of the transmission reports before sending to NSLDS. Additionally, students who communicate to the University that they are withdrawing should have their status changed in the Colleague system and therefore be included on the next transmission report. View of responsible officials Between the conclusion of the spring term and the start of the fall term, the College reported summer enrollments. However, withdrawals from students who were not enrolled in summer terms were mistakenly held until the initial fall term reporting file.
Finding Number: 2024-002 Program: Student Financial Assistance Cluster ALN #: 84.063 and 84.268 Pass-through Entity: N/A- Direct Award Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Federal Award Year: July 1, 2023 through June 30, 2024 Compliance Requirement: Cash Management Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency Criteria An institution must credit a student’s account for the amount of Title IV funds the student is eligible to receive and pay the amount of any credit balances due before the institution seeks reimbursement from ED for those disbursements. The reimbursement request must include supporting documentation for the disbursements. After the reimbursement request is approved, ED initiates an electronic funds transfer to the institution’s account. Additionally, Schools participating in the Direct Loan program are required to perform monthly Direct Loan reconciliations (34 CFR 685.300(b)(5)). A school must reconcile the funds it received from G5 with actual disbursement records the school submitted to COD. Each month, COD sends the school a School Account Statement, which is ED’s official record of the school’s cash and disbursement records and identifies the difference between the net draws from G5 and the actual disbursement information reported to COD by the school. The school is required to account for any differences by reconciling ED’s records with the school’s financial and business records. Lastly, per 2 CFR section 200.303, non-federal entities must establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provide reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. Conditions found For a sample of three monthly bank reconciliations of the College’s main operating account, we noted there was no evidence of review by the Controller. Management communicated that the review of the bank reconciliation is part of the cash management process, but the Controller does not sign them. Each monthly bank reconciliation contains a ‘Prepared by’ and ‘Reviewed by’ sign-off line. For each sample, the Senior Staff Accountant signed off as the preparer, but the Controller did not sign off on the ‘Review by’ line. Cause Bank reconciliations are reviewed by the Controller, but there is no evidence that the control is properly being performed. Proper perspective The College’s policy is for the Controller to review bank reconciliations to ensure proper drawdowns are occurring. Out of a sample of three drawdowns, we noted the three bank reconciliations did not contain the Controller’s signature indicating proper review and approval. Possible asserted effect Not reviewing the bank reconciliation could cause the College to submit requests for reimbursement through the G5 system that are not complete or accurate. Questioned costs None noted. Statistical sampling The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat finding A similar finding was not reported in the prior year. Recommendation We recommend that the College require that the Controller sign the bank reconciliation upon completing their review to signify that the reconciliation is complete and accurate. View of responsible officials The Controller was new to his position starting in December of 2023. He had reviewed all three of the bank reconciliations selected for audit review. However, he was not aware that the reconciliation actually required his signature per Emmanuel's policies and procedures to witness his review.
Finding Number: 2024-002 Program: Student Financial Assistance Cluster ALN #: 84.063 and 84.268 Pass-through Entity: N/A- Direct Award Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Federal Award Year: July 1, 2023 through June 30, 2024 Compliance Requirement: Cash Management Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency Criteria An institution must credit a student’s account for the amount of Title IV funds the student is eligible to receive and pay the amount of any credit balances due before the institution seeks reimbursement from ED for those disbursements. The reimbursement request must include supporting documentation for the disbursements. After the reimbursement request is approved, ED initiates an electronic funds transfer to the institution’s account. Additionally, Schools participating in the Direct Loan program are required to perform monthly Direct Loan reconciliations (34 CFR 685.300(b)(5)). A school must reconcile the funds it received from G5 with actual disbursement records the school submitted to COD. Each month, COD sends the school a School Account Statement, which is ED’s official record of the school’s cash and disbursement records and identifies the difference between the net draws from G5 and the actual disbursement information reported to COD by the school. The school is required to account for any differences by reconciling ED’s records with the school’s financial and business records. Lastly, per 2 CFR section 200.303, non-federal entities must establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provide reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. Conditions found For a sample of three monthly bank reconciliations of the College’s main operating account, we noted there was no evidence of review by the Controller. Management communicated that the review of the bank reconciliation is part of the cash management process, but the Controller does not sign them. Each monthly bank reconciliation contains a ‘Prepared by’ and ‘Reviewed by’ sign-off line. For each sample, the Senior Staff Accountant signed off as the preparer, but the Controller did not sign off on the ‘Review by’ line. Cause Bank reconciliations are reviewed by the Controller, but there is no evidence that the control is properly being performed. Proper perspective The College’s policy is for the Controller to review bank reconciliations to ensure proper drawdowns are occurring. Out of a sample of three drawdowns, we noted the three bank reconciliations did not contain the Controller’s signature indicating proper review and approval. Possible asserted effect Not reviewing the bank reconciliation could cause the College to submit requests for reimbursement through the G5 system that are not complete or accurate. Questioned costs None noted. Statistical sampling The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat finding A similar finding was not reported in the prior year. Recommendation We recommend that the College require that the Controller sign the bank reconciliation upon completing their review to signify that the reconciliation is complete and accurate. View of responsible officials The Controller was new to his position starting in December of 2023. He had reviewed all three of the bank reconciliations selected for audit review. However, he was not aware that the reconciliation actually required his signature per Emmanuel's policies and procedures to witness his review.
FINDING 2024-002 Information on the federal program: Subject: Head Start Cluster - Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Federal Agency: Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program: Head Start Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 93.600 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 05CH011249, 05HP000285 Compliance Requirement: Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Finding: Material Weakness, Noncompliance Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the Unit to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the activities allowed or unallowed and allowable costs/cost principle compliance requirements. The Unit did not have adequate documentation to support expenditures. Cause: The Unit's management had not developed a system of internal controls to ensure compliance with the compliance requirements listed above. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the Unit at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs: $5,407 Context: During testing, we noted the following issues in a sample of sixty head start cluster account payable and payroll transactions: • The Unit paid $5,407 in sales tax on 3 selections which is an unallowable cost. The Unit is tax-exempt as a governmental entity in the state and should not pay sales tax. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit. The prior audit finding number was 2023-001. Recommendation: We recommend the Unit obtain the necessary documentation to show vendors the Unit is a tax-exempt entity. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan
FINDING 2024-002 Information on the federal program: Subject: Head Start Cluster - Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Federal Agency: Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program: Head Start Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 93.600 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 05CH011249, 05HP000285 Compliance Requirement: Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Finding: Material Weakness, Noncompliance Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the Unit to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the activities allowed or unallowed and allowable costs/cost principle compliance requirements. The Unit did not have adequate documentation to support expenditures. Cause: The Unit's management had not developed a system of internal controls to ensure compliance with the compliance requirements listed above. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the Unit at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs: $5,407 Context: During testing, we noted the following issues in a sample of sixty head start cluster account payable and payroll transactions: • The Unit paid $5,407 in sales tax on 3 selections which is an unallowable cost. The Unit is tax-exempt as a governmental entity in the state and should not pay sales tax. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit. The prior audit finding number was 2023-001. Recommendation: We recommend the Unit obtain the necessary documentation to show vendors the Unit is a tax-exempt entity. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan
FINDING 2024-004 Information on the federal program: Subject: Head Start Cluster - Internal Controls Federal Agency: Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program: Head Start Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 93.600 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 05CH011249, 05HP000285 Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Finding: Significant Deficiency Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the Unit in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the reporting compliance requirement. Cause: The Unit's management had not developed a system of internal controls to ensure compliance with the reporting requirements. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the Unit at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs: None. Context: We noted that for the two federal financial reports in a sample of two reports, the Supervisor prepared the report without a secondary, documented review before the submission of the report to ensure the accuracy of the report. The amounts reported agreed to the supporting records without error. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit. The prior audit finding number was 2023-003. Recommendation: We recommended that the Unit implement a documented, formal review of the reports before they are submitted. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
FINDING 2024-004 Information on the federal program: Subject: Head Start Cluster - Internal Controls Federal Agency: Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program: Head Start Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 93.600 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 05CH011249, 05HP000285 Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Finding: Significant Deficiency Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the Unit in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the reporting compliance requirement. Cause: The Unit's management had not developed a system of internal controls to ensure compliance with the reporting requirements. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the Unit at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs: None. Context: We noted that for the two federal financial reports in a sample of two reports, the Supervisor prepared the report without a secondary, documented review before the submission of the report to ensure the accuracy of the report. The amounts reported agreed to the supporting records without error. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit. The prior audit finding number was 2023-003. Recommendation: We recommended that the Unit implement a documented, formal review of the reports before they are submitted. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200 §200.303 Internal Controls requires that the grant recipient must establish, document, and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the recipient is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These controls should align with the guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control-Integrated Framework” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). All laborers and mechanics employed by contractors or subcontractors to work on construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by federal assistance funds must be paid wages not less than those established for the locality of the project (prevailing wages) by the Department of Labor. Condition: Based on our testing of the wage requirements for the ESSER program, we identified that the District did not comply with the wage rate requirements for the HVAC project in a timely manner. Cause: The District did not have proper internal controls established over wage rate compliance requirements in order to identify noncompliance in a timely manner. Effect: The lack of internal controls indicates that the District may have incurred potential noncompliance and questioned costs related to the federal awards. However, based on our testing, the District complied with the wage rate requirements but the internal controls over related compliance did not operate effectively. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend that the District establish internal controls over special compliance requirements and perform them in a timely manner, such as wage rage requirements, to avoid potential questioned costs and noncompliance.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200 §200.303 Internal Controls requires that the grant recipient must establish, document, and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the recipient is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These controls should align with the guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control-Integrated Framework” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). All laborers and mechanics employed by contractors or subcontractors to work on construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by federal assistance funds must be paid wages not less than those established for the locality of the project (prevailing wages) by the Department of Labor. Condition: Based on our testing of the wage requirements for the ESSER program, we identified that the District did not comply with the wage rate requirements for the HVAC project in a timely manner. Cause: The District did not have proper internal controls established over wage rate compliance requirements in order to identify noncompliance in a timely manner. Effect: The lack of internal controls indicates that the District may have incurred potential noncompliance and questioned costs related to the federal awards. However, based on our testing, the District complied with the wage rate requirements but the internal controls over related compliance did not operate effectively. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend that the District establish internal controls over special compliance requirements and perform them in a timely manner, such as wage rage requirements, to avoid potential questioned costs and noncompliance.
Reference Number: 2024-001 Prior Year Finding: N/A Federal Agency: Pass-Through Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Maryland Department of Aging Federal Program: Aging Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 93.044, 93.045 Award Number and Year: 650122/15, 650222/15 (10/1/2021-9/30/2023); 650123/15, 650223/15 (10/1/2022-9/30/2024); 650124/15, 650224/15 (10/1/2023-9/30/2025) Compliance Requirement: Reporting Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance, Material Noncompliance Criteria or specific requirement: Compliance: Per Maryland Department of Aging guidance, the County is required to submit quarterly financials forms outlining grant spending progress, matching requirements, budget categories, and any other revenue sources for all open grants. Control: Per 2 CFR section 200.303(a), a non-Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should comply with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition: Prince George’s County (the County) did not submit required quarterly reports to the Maryland Department of Aging during FY24. Context: For seven of seven quarterly reports selected for testing, the County was unable to provide documentation that the report had been submitted during FY24. Cause: The County’s policies and procedures were not sufficient to ensure that required reports were submitted to the Maryland Department of Aging as required. Internal controls did not prevent or detect the errors. Effect: The County is not in compliance with reporting requirements. Questioned costs: None noted. Recommendation: We recommend that the County develop internal controls and procedures to ensure that quarterly reporting requirements are met. We further recommend the County develop controls and procedures to ensure that all required reports are submitted timely to the Maryland Department of Aging. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Reference Number: 2024-001 Prior Year Finding: N/A Federal Agency: Pass-Through Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Maryland Department of Aging Federal Program: Aging Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 93.044, 93.045 Award Number and Year: 650122/15, 650222/15 (10/1/2021-9/30/2023); 650123/15, 650223/15 (10/1/2022-9/30/2024); 650124/15, 650224/15 (10/1/2023-9/30/2025) Compliance Requirement: Reporting Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance, Material Noncompliance Criteria or specific requirement: Compliance: Per Maryland Department of Aging guidance, the County is required to submit quarterly financials forms outlining grant spending progress, matching requirements, budget categories, and any other revenue sources for all open grants. Control: Per 2 CFR section 200.303(a), a non-Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should comply with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition: Prince George’s County (the County) did not submit required quarterly reports to the Maryland Department of Aging during FY24. Context: For seven of seven quarterly reports selected for testing, the County was unable to provide documentation that the report had been submitted during FY24. Cause: The County’s policies and procedures were not sufficient to ensure that required reports were submitted to the Maryland Department of Aging as required. Internal controls did not prevent or detect the errors. Effect: The County is not in compliance with reporting requirements. Questioned costs: None noted. Recommendation: We recommend that the County develop internal controls and procedures to ensure that quarterly reporting requirements are met. We further recommend the County develop controls and procedures to ensure that all required reports are submitted timely to the Maryland Department of Aging. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Reference Number: 2024-001 Prior Year Finding: N/A Federal Agency: Pass-Through Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Maryland Department of Aging Federal Program: Aging Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 93.044, 93.045 Award Number and Year: 650122/15, 650222/15 (10/1/2021-9/30/2023); 650123/15, 650223/15 (10/1/2022-9/30/2024); 650124/15, 650224/15 (10/1/2023-9/30/2025) Compliance Requirement: Reporting Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance, Material Noncompliance Criteria or specific requirement: Compliance: Per Maryland Department of Aging guidance, the County is required to submit quarterly financials forms outlining grant spending progress, matching requirements, budget categories, and any other revenue sources for all open grants. Control: Per 2 CFR section 200.303(a), a non-Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should comply with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition: Prince George’s County (the County) did not submit required quarterly reports to the Maryland Department of Aging during FY24. Context: For seven of seven quarterly reports selected for testing, the County was unable to provide documentation that the report had been submitted during FY24. Cause: The County’s policies and procedures were not sufficient to ensure that required reports were submitted to the Maryland Department of Aging as required. Internal controls did not prevent or detect the errors. Effect: The County is not in compliance with reporting requirements. Questioned costs: None noted. Recommendation: We recommend that the County develop internal controls and procedures to ensure that quarterly reporting requirements are met. We further recommend the County develop controls and procedures to ensure that all required reports are submitted timely to the Maryland Department of Aging. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Reference Number: 2024-001 Prior Year Finding: N/A Federal Agency: Pass-Through Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Maryland Department of Aging Federal Program: Aging Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 93.044, 93.045 Award Number and Year: 650122/15, 650222/15 (10/1/2021-9/30/2023); 650123/15, 650223/15 (10/1/2022-9/30/2024); 650124/15, 650224/15 (10/1/2023-9/30/2025) Compliance Requirement: Reporting Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance, Material Noncompliance Criteria or specific requirement: Compliance: Per Maryland Department of Aging guidance, the County is required to submit quarterly financials forms outlining grant spending progress, matching requirements, budget categories, and any other revenue sources for all open grants. Control: Per 2 CFR section 200.303(a), a non-Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should comply with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition: Prince George’s County (the County) did not submit required quarterly reports to the Maryland Department of Aging during FY24. Context: For seven of seven quarterly reports selected for testing, the County was unable to provide documentation that the report had been submitted during FY24. Cause: The County’s policies and procedures were not sufficient to ensure that required reports were submitted to the Maryland Department of Aging as required. Internal controls did not prevent or detect the errors. Effect: The County is not in compliance with reporting requirements. Questioned costs: None noted. Recommendation: We recommend that the County develop internal controls and procedures to ensure that quarterly reporting requirements are met. We further recommend the County develop controls and procedures to ensure that all required reports are submitted timely to the Maryland Department of Aging. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
FINDING 2024-003 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Eligibility Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY22-23, FY23-24 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Eligibility Audit Finding: Material Weakness Condition and Context The School Corporation had not properly implemented a system of internal controls, which would include appropriate segregation of duties, that would likely be effective in preventing, or detecting and correcting, noncompliance related to a child receiving free or reduced-price meals. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 18 NORTH NEWTON SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Any child enrolled in a participating school who meets the applicable program's definition of "child," may receive meals under the applicable program. In the case of the National School Lunch Program and the School Breakfast Program, children belonging to households meeting nationwide income eligibility requirements may receive meals at no charge or at reduced price. Children who have been determined ineligible for free or reduced-price school meals pay the full price, set by the School Food Authority, for their meals. Children attending SFSP meal service sites receive their meals at no charge. As a general rule, a child's eligibility for free or reduced-price meals under a Child Nutrition Cluster program may be established by the submission of an annual application or statement which furnishes such information as family income and family size. Local educational agencies, institutions, and sponsors then determine eligibility by comparing the data reported by the child's household to published income eligibility guidelines. Additionally, a child may be direct certified. For a Direct Certification, annual eligibility determinations are based on the child's household receiving benefits under SNAP, FDPIR, the Head Start Program (ALN 93.600), or, under most circumstances, the TANF program (ALN 93.558). A household may furnish documentation of its participation in one of these programs; or the school, institution, or sponsor may obtain the information directly from the state or local agency that administers these programs. Certain foster, runaway, homeless, and migrant children are categorically eligible for free school lunches and breakfasts. Direct certified households do not need to complete an application. Direct Certifications The Food Service Director (Director) downloaded the Direct Certification report from the State of Indiana database monthly and uploaded it to the school lunch point-of-sale (POS) system. However, there was no documentation that a review process took place to ensure the uploads had imported correctly and students' status was updated accordingly. Applications Eligibility for applications submitted for free and reduced lunch were determined by a Kitchen Manager or the Director manually and by the POS system based on the published income eligibility guidelines. For applications that were determined by a Kitchen Manager, the Director reviewed and redetermined eligibility. However, this review process was not consistently documented. The Director downloaded the new income eligibility guidelines that were updated in the POS system by the software vendor. The Director reviewed the accuracy of the income eligibility guidelines and then saved them to the POS system. Documentation that the review process was implemented properly could not be provided. The lack of internal controls was a systemic issue throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 19 NORTH NEWTON SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Cause The system of internal controls over the monthly Direct Certification uploads, the review of the income eligibility guidelines saved in the POS system, and the manual determinations were not properly implemented. The Director did not maintain documentation that the review process had occurred. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirement could result in the repayment of federal funds. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management implement a proper system of internal controls that would ensure that the appropriate reviews, approvals, and oversight are documented. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-003 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Eligibility Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY22-23, FY23-24 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Eligibility Audit Finding: Material Weakness Condition and Context The School Corporation had not properly implemented a system of internal controls, which would include appropriate segregation of duties, that would likely be effective in preventing, or detecting and correcting, noncompliance related to a child receiving free or reduced-price meals. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 18 NORTH NEWTON SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Any child enrolled in a participating school who meets the applicable program's definition of "child," may receive meals under the applicable program. In the case of the National School Lunch Program and the School Breakfast Program, children belonging to households meeting nationwide income eligibility requirements may receive meals at no charge or at reduced price. Children who have been determined ineligible for free or reduced-price school meals pay the full price, set by the School Food Authority, for their meals. Children attending SFSP meal service sites receive their meals at no charge. As a general rule, a child's eligibility for free or reduced-price meals under a Child Nutrition Cluster program may be established by the submission of an annual application or statement which furnishes such information as family income and family size. Local educational agencies, institutions, and sponsors then determine eligibility by comparing the data reported by the child's household to published income eligibility guidelines. Additionally, a child may be direct certified. For a Direct Certification, annual eligibility determinations are based on the child's household receiving benefits under SNAP, FDPIR, the Head Start Program (ALN 93.600), or, under most circumstances, the TANF program (ALN 93.558). A household may furnish documentation of its participation in one of these programs; or the school, institution, or sponsor may obtain the information directly from the state or local agency that administers these programs. Certain foster, runaway, homeless, and migrant children are categorically eligible for free school lunches and breakfasts. Direct certified households do not need to complete an application. Direct Certifications The Food Service Director (Director) downloaded the Direct Certification report from the State of Indiana database monthly and uploaded it to the school lunch point-of-sale (POS) system. However, there was no documentation that a review process took place to ensure the uploads had imported correctly and students' status was updated accordingly. Applications Eligibility for applications submitted for free and reduced lunch were determined by a Kitchen Manager or the Director manually and by the POS system based on the published income eligibility guidelines. For applications that were determined by a Kitchen Manager, the Director reviewed and redetermined eligibility. However, this review process was not consistently documented. The Director downloaded the new income eligibility guidelines that were updated in the POS system by the software vendor. The Director reviewed the accuracy of the income eligibility guidelines and then saved them to the POS system. Documentation that the review process was implemented properly could not be provided. The lack of internal controls was a systemic issue throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 19 NORTH NEWTON SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Cause The system of internal controls over the monthly Direct Certification uploads, the review of the income eligibility guidelines saved in the POS system, and the manual determinations were not properly implemented. The Director did not maintain documentation that the review process had occurred. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirement could result in the repayment of federal funds. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management implement a proper system of internal controls that would ensure that the appropriate reviews, approvals, and oversight are documented. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-003 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Eligibility Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY22-23, FY23-24 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Eligibility Audit Finding: Material Weakness Condition and Context The School Corporation had not properly implemented a system of internal controls, which would include appropriate segregation of duties, that would likely be effective in preventing, or detecting and correcting, noncompliance related to a child receiving free or reduced-price meals. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 18 NORTH NEWTON SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Any child enrolled in a participating school who meets the applicable program's definition of "child," may receive meals under the applicable program. In the case of the National School Lunch Program and the School Breakfast Program, children belonging to households meeting nationwide income eligibility requirements may receive meals at no charge or at reduced price. Children who have been determined ineligible for free or reduced-price school meals pay the full price, set by the School Food Authority, for their meals. Children attending SFSP meal service sites receive their meals at no charge. As a general rule, a child's eligibility for free or reduced-price meals under a Child Nutrition Cluster program may be established by the submission of an annual application or statement which furnishes such information as family income and family size. Local educational agencies, institutions, and sponsors then determine eligibility by comparing the data reported by the child's household to published income eligibility guidelines. Additionally, a child may be direct certified. For a Direct Certification, annual eligibility determinations are based on the child's household receiving benefits under SNAP, FDPIR, the Head Start Program (ALN 93.600), or, under most circumstances, the TANF program (ALN 93.558). A household may furnish documentation of its participation in one of these programs; or the school, institution, or sponsor may obtain the information directly from the state or local agency that administers these programs. Certain foster, runaway, homeless, and migrant children are categorically eligible for free school lunches and breakfasts. Direct certified households do not need to complete an application. Direct Certifications The Food Service Director (Director) downloaded the Direct Certification report from the State of Indiana database monthly and uploaded it to the school lunch point-of-sale (POS) system. However, there was no documentation that a review process took place to ensure the uploads had imported correctly and students' status was updated accordingly. Applications Eligibility for applications submitted for free and reduced lunch were determined by a Kitchen Manager or the Director manually and by the POS system based on the published income eligibility guidelines. For applications that were determined by a Kitchen Manager, the Director reviewed and redetermined eligibility. However, this review process was not consistently documented. The Director downloaded the new income eligibility guidelines that were updated in the POS system by the software vendor. The Director reviewed the accuracy of the income eligibility guidelines and then saved them to the POS system. Documentation that the review process was implemented properly could not be provided. The lack of internal controls was a systemic issue throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 19 NORTH NEWTON SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Cause The system of internal controls over the monthly Direct Certification uploads, the review of the income eligibility guidelines saved in the POS system, and the manual determinations were not properly implemented. The Director did not maintain documentation that the review process had occurred. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirement could result in the repayment of federal funds. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management implement a proper system of internal controls that would ensure that the appropriate reviews, approvals, and oversight are documented. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-003 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Eligibility Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY22-23, FY23-24 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Eligibility Audit Finding: Material Weakness Condition and Context The School Corporation had not properly implemented a system of internal controls, which would include appropriate segregation of duties, that would likely be effective in preventing, or detecting and correcting, noncompliance related to a child receiving free or reduced-price meals. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 18 NORTH NEWTON SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Any child enrolled in a participating school who meets the applicable program's definition of "child," may receive meals under the applicable program. In the case of the National School Lunch Program and the School Breakfast Program, children belonging to households meeting nationwide income eligibility requirements may receive meals at no charge or at reduced price. Children who have been determined ineligible for free or reduced-price school meals pay the full price, set by the School Food Authority, for their meals. Children attending SFSP meal service sites receive their meals at no charge. As a general rule, a child's eligibility for free or reduced-price meals under a Child Nutrition Cluster program may be established by the submission of an annual application or statement which furnishes such information as family income and family size. Local educational agencies, institutions, and sponsors then determine eligibility by comparing the data reported by the child's household to published income eligibility guidelines. Additionally, a child may be direct certified. For a Direct Certification, annual eligibility determinations are based on the child's household receiving benefits under SNAP, FDPIR, the Head Start Program (ALN 93.600), or, under most circumstances, the TANF program (ALN 93.558). A household may furnish documentation of its participation in one of these programs; or the school, institution, or sponsor may obtain the information directly from the state or local agency that administers these programs. Certain foster, runaway, homeless, and migrant children are categorically eligible for free school lunches and breakfasts. Direct certified households do not need to complete an application. Direct Certifications The Food Service Director (Director) downloaded the Direct Certification report from the State of Indiana database monthly and uploaded it to the school lunch point-of-sale (POS) system. However, there was no documentation that a review process took place to ensure the uploads had imported correctly and students' status was updated accordingly. Applications Eligibility for applications submitted for free and reduced lunch were determined by a Kitchen Manager or the Director manually and by the POS system based on the published income eligibility guidelines. For applications that were determined by a Kitchen Manager, the Director reviewed and redetermined eligibility. However, this review process was not consistently documented. The Director downloaded the new income eligibility guidelines that were updated in the POS system by the software vendor. The Director reviewed the accuracy of the income eligibility guidelines and then saved them to the POS system. Documentation that the review process was implemented properly could not be provided. The lack of internal controls was a systemic issue throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 19 NORTH NEWTON SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Cause The system of internal controls over the monthly Direct Certification uploads, the review of the income eligibility guidelines saved in the POS system, and the manual determinations were not properly implemented. The Director did not maintain documentation that the review process had occurred. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirement could result in the repayment of federal funds. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management implement a proper system of internal controls that would ensure that the appropriate reviews, approvals, and oversight are documented. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-004 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY22-23, FY23-24 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context An effective system of internal controls was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with federal award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the SAM exclusions, collecting a certification from that person, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 20 NORTH NEWTON SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) A population of two covered transactions for purchases that equaled or exceeded $25,000 paid from the School Lunch fund were identified. The transactions totaling $76,138 were tested; however, the School Corporation did not verify the suspension and debarment status prior to entering into the contracts. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause The School Corporation's process was to check for SAM Exclusions, collect a certification from the vendor, or add a clause or condition to the covered transaction with the vendor. However, the SAM exclusion check process was not properly implemented for the vendors tested nor was a certification collected, or a clause or condition added to the covered transaction. Effect Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirement could result in the repayment of federal funds. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management evaluate the procedures established to ensure processes are functioning as intended to prevent, or detect and correct, material noncompliance. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 21 NORTH NEWTON SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-004 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY22-23, FY23-24 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context An effective system of internal controls was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with federal award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the SAM exclusions, collecting a certification from that person, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 20 NORTH NEWTON SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) A population of two covered transactions for purchases that equaled or exceeded $25,000 paid from the School Lunch fund were identified. The transactions totaling $76,138 were tested; however, the School Corporation did not verify the suspension and debarment status prior to entering into the contracts. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause The School Corporation's process was to check for SAM Exclusions, collect a certification from the vendor, or add a clause or condition to the covered transaction with the vendor. However, the SAM exclusion check process was not properly implemented for the vendors tested nor was a certification collected, or a clause or condition added to the covered transaction. Effect Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirement could result in the repayment of federal funds. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management evaluate the procedures established to ensure processes are functioning as intended to prevent, or detect and correct, material noncompliance. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 21 NORTH NEWTON SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-004 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY22-23, FY23-24 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context An effective system of internal controls was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with federal award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the SAM exclusions, collecting a certification from that person, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 20 NORTH NEWTON SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) A population of two covered transactions for purchases that equaled or exceeded $25,000 paid from the School Lunch fund were identified. The transactions totaling $76,138 were tested; however, the School Corporation did not verify the suspension and debarment status prior to entering into the contracts. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause The School Corporation's process was to check for SAM Exclusions, collect a certification from the vendor, or add a clause or condition to the covered transaction with the vendor. However, the SAM exclusion check process was not properly implemented for the vendors tested nor was a certification collected, or a clause or condition added to the covered transaction. Effect Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirement could result in the repayment of federal funds. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management evaluate the procedures established to ensure processes are functioning as intended to prevent, or detect and correct, material noncompliance. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 21 NORTH NEWTON SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-004 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY22-23, FY23-24 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context An effective system of internal controls was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with federal award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the SAM exclusions, collecting a certification from that person, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 20 NORTH NEWTON SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) A population of two covered transactions for purchases that equaled or exceeded $25,000 paid from the School Lunch fund were identified. The transactions totaling $76,138 were tested; however, the School Corporation did not verify the suspension and debarment status prior to entering into the contracts. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause The School Corporation's process was to check for SAM Exclusions, collect a certification from the vendor, or add a clause or condition to the covered transaction with the vendor. However, the SAM exclusion check process was not properly implemented for the vendors tested nor was a certification collected, or a clause or condition added to the covered transaction. Effect Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirement could result in the repayment of federal funds. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management evaluate the procedures established to ensure processes are functioning as intended to prevent, or detect and correct, material noncompliance. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 21 NORTH NEWTON SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-004 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY22-23, FY23-24 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context An effective system of internal controls was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with federal award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the SAM exclusions, collecting a certification from that person, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 20 NORTH NEWTON SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) A population of two covered transactions for purchases that equaled or exceeded $25,000 paid from the School Lunch fund were identified. The transactions totaling $76,138 were tested; however, the School Corporation did not verify the suspension and debarment status prior to entering into the contracts. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause The School Corporation's process was to check for SAM Exclusions, collect a certification from the vendor, or add a clause or condition to the covered transaction with the vendor. However, the SAM exclusion check process was not properly implemented for the vendors tested nor was a certification collected, or a clause or condition added to the covered transaction. Effect Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirement could result in the repayment of federal funds. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management evaluate the procedures established to ensure processes are functioning as intended to prevent, or detect and correct, material noncompliance. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 21 NORTH NEWTON SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-005 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Period of Performance Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, COVID-19 - Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants, COVID-19 - Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.173 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 22611-047-PN01, 22611-047-ARP, 22619-047-PN01, 22619-047-ARP Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Period of Performance Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context During the audit period, the School Corporation was a member of the Cooperative School Services (Cooperative). The Cooperative operated the special education programs and spent the federal money on behalf of its member schools. As the grant agreement was between the Indiana Department of Education and each member school, the School Corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. For Special Education Cluster awards, funds must be obligated during the 27 months, extending from July 1 of the fiscal year for which the funds were appropriated through September 30 of the second following fiscal year. When testing transactions which occurred in the liquidation period for the 22611-047-PN01, 22611-047-ARP, 22619-047-PN01, and 22619-047-ARP grant awards, two exceptions were identified in the initial sample of five transactions. When expanding the sample, a third exception was noted, and it was concluded that it would not be appropriate to examine the remaining 14 transactions. For the above listed awards, costs must be obligated by September 30, 2023. For the three identified exceptions, an initial purchase order was made in September, but the ultimate transaction was paid to a separate vendor than the original purchase order, and this obligation was incurred in November 2023. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 22 NORTH NEWTON SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 2 CFR 200.403(h) states: "Cost must be incurred during the approved budget period. The Federal awarding agency is authorized, at its discretion, to waive prior written approvals to carry forward unobligated balances to subsequent budget periods pursuant to § 200.308(e)(3)." 34 CFR 76.707 states in part: ". . . If the obligation is for- . . . (d) Performance of work other than personal services. . . . The obligation is made- On the date on which the State or subgrantee makes a binding written commitment to acquire the property. . . ." 2 CFR 200.1 states in part: ". . . Period of Performance means the total estimated time interval between the start of an initial Federal award and the planned end date . . ." 36 CFR 76.709(a) states: "If a State or a subgrantee does not obligate all of its grant or subgrant funds by the end of the fiscal year for which Congress appropriated the funds, it may obligate the remaining funds during a carryover period of one additional fiscal year." Cause Management had established an initial obligation date that occurred in September of the second fiscal year but modified the final vendor for payment. The new obligation occurred after the period in which the School Corporation was allowed to incur the expense. Effect If funds are not obligated by the end of the specified date, the grantor agency is not obligated to reimburse the School Corporation for costs incurred. This may indicate that the funding that was reimbursed, which incurred outside of the period of performance, will need to be repaid to the grantor agency, and the School Corporation will then need to support the costs with nonfederal funding. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure that no costs are incurred after the September 30 deadline and to ensure compliance with the grant agreement and the Period of Performance compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-005 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Period of Performance Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, COVID-19 - Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants, COVID-19 - Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.173 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 22611-047-PN01, 22611-047-ARP, 22619-047-PN01, 22619-047-ARP Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Period of Performance Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context During the audit period, the School Corporation was a member of the Cooperative School Services (Cooperative). The Cooperative operated the special education programs and spent the federal money on behalf of its member schools. As the grant agreement was between the Indiana Department of Education and each member school, the School Corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. For Special Education Cluster awards, funds must be obligated during the 27 months, extending from July 1 of the fiscal year for which the funds were appropriated through September 30 of the second following fiscal year. When testing transactions which occurred in the liquidation period for the 22611-047-PN01, 22611-047-ARP, 22619-047-PN01, and 22619-047-ARP grant awards, two exceptions were identified in the initial sample of five transactions. When expanding the sample, a third exception was noted, and it was concluded that it would not be appropriate to examine the remaining 14 transactions. For the above listed awards, costs must be obligated by September 30, 2023. For the three identified exceptions, an initial purchase order was made in September, but the ultimate transaction was paid to a separate vendor than the original purchase order, and this obligation was incurred in November 2023. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 22 NORTH NEWTON SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 2 CFR 200.403(h) states: "Cost must be incurred during the approved budget period. The Federal awarding agency is authorized, at its discretion, to waive prior written approvals to carry forward unobligated balances to subsequent budget periods pursuant to § 200.308(e)(3)." 34 CFR 76.707 states in part: ". . . If the obligation is for- . . . (d) Performance of work other than personal services. . . . The obligation is made- On the date on which the State or subgrantee makes a binding written commitment to acquire the property. . . ." 2 CFR 200.1 states in part: ". . . Period of Performance means the total estimated time interval between the start of an initial Federal award and the planned end date . . ." 36 CFR 76.709(a) states: "If a State or a subgrantee does not obligate all of its grant or subgrant funds by the end of the fiscal year for which Congress appropriated the funds, it may obligate the remaining funds during a carryover period of one additional fiscal year." Cause Management had established an initial obligation date that occurred in September of the second fiscal year but modified the final vendor for payment. The new obligation occurred after the period in which the School Corporation was allowed to incur the expense. Effect If funds are not obligated by the end of the specified date, the grantor agency is not obligated to reimburse the School Corporation for costs incurred. This may indicate that the funding that was reimbursed, which incurred outside of the period of performance, will need to be repaid to the grantor agency, and the School Corporation will then need to support the costs with nonfederal funding. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure that no costs are incurred after the September 30 deadline and to ensure compliance with the grant agreement and the Period of Performance compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-005 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Period of Performance Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, COVID-19 - Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants, COVID-19 - Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.173 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 22611-047-PN01, 22611-047-ARP, 22619-047-PN01, 22619-047-ARP Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Period of Performance Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context During the audit period, the School Corporation was a member of the Cooperative School Services (Cooperative). The Cooperative operated the special education programs and spent the federal money on behalf of its member schools. As the grant agreement was between the Indiana Department of Education and each member school, the School Corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. For Special Education Cluster awards, funds must be obligated during the 27 months, extending from July 1 of the fiscal year for which the funds were appropriated through September 30 of the second following fiscal year. When testing transactions which occurred in the liquidation period for the 22611-047-PN01, 22611-047-ARP, 22619-047-PN01, and 22619-047-ARP grant awards, two exceptions were identified in the initial sample of five transactions. When expanding the sample, a third exception was noted, and it was concluded that it would not be appropriate to examine the remaining 14 transactions. For the above listed awards, costs must be obligated by September 30, 2023. For the three identified exceptions, an initial purchase order was made in September, but the ultimate transaction was paid to a separate vendor than the original purchase order, and this obligation was incurred in November 2023. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 22 NORTH NEWTON SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 2 CFR 200.403(h) states: "Cost must be incurred during the approved budget period. The Federal awarding agency is authorized, at its discretion, to waive prior written approvals to carry forward unobligated balances to subsequent budget periods pursuant to § 200.308(e)(3)." 34 CFR 76.707 states in part: ". . . If the obligation is for- . . . (d) Performance of work other than personal services. . . . The obligation is made- On the date on which the State or subgrantee makes a binding written commitment to acquire the property. . . ." 2 CFR 200.1 states in part: ". . . Period of Performance means the total estimated time interval between the start of an initial Federal award and the planned end date . . ." 36 CFR 76.709(a) states: "If a State or a subgrantee does not obligate all of its grant or subgrant funds by the end of the fiscal year for which Congress appropriated the funds, it may obligate the remaining funds during a carryover period of one additional fiscal year." Cause Management had established an initial obligation date that occurred in September of the second fiscal year but modified the final vendor for payment. The new obligation occurred after the period in which the School Corporation was allowed to incur the expense. Effect If funds are not obligated by the end of the specified date, the grantor agency is not obligated to reimburse the School Corporation for costs incurred. This may indicate that the funding that was reimbursed, which incurred outside of the period of performance, will need to be repaid to the grantor agency, and the School Corporation will then need to support the costs with nonfederal funding. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure that no costs are incurred after the September 30 deadline and to ensure compliance with the grant agreement and the Period of Performance compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-005 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Period of Performance Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, COVID-19 - Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants, COVID-19 - Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.173 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 22611-047-PN01, 22611-047-ARP, 22619-047-PN01, 22619-047-ARP Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Period of Performance Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context During the audit period, the School Corporation was a member of the Cooperative School Services (Cooperative). The Cooperative operated the special education programs and spent the federal money on behalf of its member schools. As the grant agreement was between the Indiana Department of Education and each member school, the School Corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. For Special Education Cluster awards, funds must be obligated during the 27 months, extending from July 1 of the fiscal year for which the funds were appropriated through September 30 of the second following fiscal year. When testing transactions which occurred in the liquidation period for the 22611-047-PN01, 22611-047-ARP, 22619-047-PN01, and 22619-047-ARP grant awards, two exceptions were identified in the initial sample of five transactions. When expanding the sample, a third exception was noted, and it was concluded that it would not be appropriate to examine the remaining 14 transactions. For the above listed awards, costs must be obligated by September 30, 2023. For the three identified exceptions, an initial purchase order was made in September, but the ultimate transaction was paid to a separate vendor than the original purchase order, and this obligation was incurred in November 2023. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 22 NORTH NEWTON SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 2 CFR 200.403(h) states: "Cost must be incurred during the approved budget period. The Federal awarding agency is authorized, at its discretion, to waive prior written approvals to carry forward unobligated balances to subsequent budget periods pursuant to § 200.308(e)(3)." 34 CFR 76.707 states in part: ". . . If the obligation is for- . . . (d) Performance of work other than personal services. . . . The obligation is made- On the date on which the State or subgrantee makes a binding written commitment to acquire the property. . . ." 2 CFR 200.1 states in part: ". . . Period of Performance means the total estimated time interval between the start of an initial Federal award and the planned end date . . ." 36 CFR 76.709(a) states: "If a State or a subgrantee does not obligate all of its grant or subgrant funds by the end of the fiscal year for which Congress appropriated the funds, it may obligate the remaining funds during a carryover period of one additional fiscal year." Cause Management had established an initial obligation date that occurred in September of the second fiscal year but modified the final vendor for payment. The new obligation occurred after the period in which the School Corporation was allowed to incur the expense. Effect If funds are not obligated by the end of the specified date, the grantor agency is not obligated to reimburse the School Corporation for costs incurred. This may indicate that the funding that was reimbursed, which incurred outside of the period of performance, will need to be repaid to the grantor agency, and the School Corporation will then need to support the costs with nonfederal funding. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure that no costs are incurred after the September 30 deadline and to ensure compliance with the grant agreement and the Period of Performance compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-005 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Period of Performance Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, COVID-19 - Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants, COVID-19 - Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.173 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 22611-047-PN01, 22611-047-ARP, 22619-047-PN01, 22619-047-ARP Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Period of Performance Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context During the audit period, the School Corporation was a member of the Cooperative School Services (Cooperative). The Cooperative operated the special education programs and spent the federal money on behalf of its member schools. As the grant agreement was between the Indiana Department of Education and each member school, the School Corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. For Special Education Cluster awards, funds must be obligated during the 27 months, extending from July 1 of the fiscal year for which the funds were appropriated through September 30 of the second following fiscal year. When testing transactions which occurred in the liquidation period for the 22611-047-PN01, 22611-047-ARP, 22619-047-PN01, and 22619-047-ARP grant awards, two exceptions were identified in the initial sample of five transactions. When expanding the sample, a third exception was noted, and it was concluded that it would not be appropriate to examine the remaining 14 transactions. For the above listed awards, costs must be obligated by September 30, 2023. For the three identified exceptions, an initial purchase order was made in September, but the ultimate transaction was paid to a separate vendor than the original purchase order, and this obligation was incurred in November 2023. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 22 NORTH NEWTON SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 2 CFR 200.403(h) states: "Cost must be incurred during the approved budget period. The Federal awarding agency is authorized, at its discretion, to waive prior written approvals to carry forward unobligated balances to subsequent budget periods pursuant to § 200.308(e)(3)." 34 CFR 76.707 states in part: ". . . If the obligation is for- . . . (d) Performance of work other than personal services. . . . The obligation is made- On the date on which the State or subgrantee makes a binding written commitment to acquire the property. . . ." 2 CFR 200.1 states in part: ". . . Period of Performance means the total estimated time interval between the start of an initial Federal award and the planned end date . . ." 36 CFR 76.709(a) states: "If a State or a subgrantee does not obligate all of its grant or subgrant funds by the end of the fiscal year for which Congress appropriated the funds, it may obligate the remaining funds during a carryover period of one additional fiscal year." Cause Management had established an initial obligation date that occurred in September of the second fiscal year but modified the final vendor for payment. The new obligation occurred after the period in which the School Corporation was allowed to incur the expense. Effect If funds are not obligated by the end of the specified date, the grantor agency is not obligated to reimburse the School Corporation for costs incurred. This may indicate that the funding that was reimbursed, which incurred outside of the period of performance, will need to be repaid to the grantor agency, and the School Corporation will then need to support the costs with nonfederal funding. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure that no costs are incurred after the September 30 deadline and to ensure compliance with the grant agreement and the Period of Performance compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-005 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Period of Performance Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, COVID-19 - Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants, COVID-19 - Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.173 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 22611-047-PN01, 22611-047-ARP, 22619-047-PN01, 22619-047-ARP Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Period of Performance Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context During the audit period, the School Corporation was a member of the Cooperative School Services (Cooperative). The Cooperative operated the special education programs and spent the federal money on behalf of its member schools. As the grant agreement was between the Indiana Department of Education and each member school, the School Corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. For Special Education Cluster awards, funds must be obligated during the 27 months, extending from July 1 of the fiscal year for which the funds were appropriated through September 30 of the second following fiscal year. When testing transactions which occurred in the liquidation period for the 22611-047-PN01, 22611-047-ARP, 22619-047-PN01, and 22619-047-ARP grant awards, two exceptions were identified in the initial sample of five transactions. When expanding the sample, a third exception was noted, and it was concluded that it would not be appropriate to examine the remaining 14 transactions. For the above listed awards, costs must be obligated by September 30, 2023. For the three identified exceptions, an initial purchase order was made in September, but the ultimate transaction was paid to a separate vendor than the original purchase order, and this obligation was incurred in November 2023. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 22 NORTH NEWTON SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 2 CFR 200.403(h) states: "Cost must be incurred during the approved budget period. The Federal awarding agency is authorized, at its discretion, to waive prior written approvals to carry forward unobligated balances to subsequent budget periods pursuant to § 200.308(e)(3)." 34 CFR 76.707 states in part: ". . . If the obligation is for- . . . (d) Performance of work other than personal services. . . . The obligation is made- On the date on which the State or subgrantee makes a binding written commitment to acquire the property. . . ." 2 CFR 200.1 states in part: ". . . Period of Performance means the total estimated time interval between the start of an initial Federal award and the planned end date . . ." 36 CFR 76.709(a) states: "If a State or a subgrantee does not obligate all of its grant or subgrant funds by the end of the fiscal year for which Congress appropriated the funds, it may obligate the remaining funds during a carryover period of one additional fiscal year." Cause Management had established an initial obligation date that occurred in September of the second fiscal year but modified the final vendor for payment. The new obligation occurred after the period in which the School Corporation was allowed to incur the expense. Effect If funds are not obligated by the end of the specified date, the grantor agency is not obligated to reimburse the School Corporation for costs incurred. This may indicate that the funding that was reimbursed, which incurred outside of the period of performance, will need to be repaid to the grantor agency, and the School Corporation will then need to support the costs with nonfederal funding. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure that no costs are incurred after the September 30 deadline and to ensure compliance with the grant agreement and the Period of Performance compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-005 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Period of Performance Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, COVID-19 - Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants, COVID-19 - Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.173 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 22611-047-PN01, 22611-047-ARP, 22619-047-PN01, 22619-047-ARP Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Period of Performance Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context During the audit period, the School Corporation was a member of the Cooperative School Services (Cooperative). The Cooperative operated the special education programs and spent the federal money on behalf of its member schools. As the grant agreement was between the Indiana Department of Education and each member school, the School Corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. For Special Education Cluster awards, funds must be obligated during the 27 months, extending from July 1 of the fiscal year for which the funds were appropriated through September 30 of the second following fiscal year. When testing transactions which occurred in the liquidation period for the 22611-047-PN01, 22611-047-ARP, 22619-047-PN01, and 22619-047-ARP grant awards, two exceptions were identified in the initial sample of five transactions. When expanding the sample, a third exception was noted, and it was concluded that it would not be appropriate to examine the remaining 14 transactions. For the above listed awards, costs must be obligated by September 30, 2023. For the three identified exceptions, an initial purchase order was made in September, but the ultimate transaction was paid to a separate vendor than the original purchase order, and this obligation was incurred in November 2023. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 22 NORTH NEWTON SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 2 CFR 200.403(h) states: "Cost must be incurred during the approved budget period. The Federal awarding agency is authorized, at its discretion, to waive prior written approvals to carry forward unobligated balances to subsequent budget periods pursuant to § 200.308(e)(3)." 34 CFR 76.707 states in part: ". . . If the obligation is for- . . . (d) Performance of work other than personal services. . . . The obligation is made- On the date on which the State or subgrantee makes a binding written commitment to acquire the property. . . ." 2 CFR 200.1 states in part: ". . . Period of Performance means the total estimated time interval between the start of an initial Federal award and the planned end date . . ." 36 CFR 76.709(a) states: "If a State or a subgrantee does not obligate all of its grant or subgrant funds by the end of the fiscal year for which Congress appropriated the funds, it may obligate the remaining funds during a carryover period of one additional fiscal year." Cause Management had established an initial obligation date that occurred in September of the second fiscal year but modified the final vendor for payment. The new obligation occurred after the period in which the School Corporation was allowed to incur the expense. Effect If funds are not obligated by the end of the specified date, the grantor agency is not obligated to reimburse the School Corporation for costs incurred. This may indicate that the funding that was reimbursed, which incurred outside of the period of performance, will need to be repaid to the grantor agency, and the School Corporation will then need to support the costs with nonfederal funding. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure that no costs are incurred after the September 30 deadline and to ensure compliance with the grant agreement and the Period of Performance compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-005 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Period of Performance Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, COVID-19 - Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants, COVID-19 - Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.173 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 22611-047-PN01, 22611-047-ARP, 22619-047-PN01, 22619-047-ARP Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Period of Performance Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context During the audit period, the School Corporation was a member of the Cooperative School Services (Cooperative). The Cooperative operated the special education programs and spent the federal money on behalf of its member schools. As the grant agreement was between the Indiana Department of Education and each member school, the School Corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. For Special Education Cluster awards, funds must be obligated during the 27 months, extending from July 1 of the fiscal year for which the funds were appropriated through September 30 of the second following fiscal year. When testing transactions which occurred in the liquidation period for the 22611-047-PN01, 22611-047-ARP, 22619-047-PN01, and 22619-047-ARP grant awards, two exceptions were identified in the initial sample of five transactions. When expanding the sample, a third exception was noted, and it was concluded that it would not be appropriate to examine the remaining 14 transactions. For the above listed awards, costs must be obligated by September 30, 2023. For the three identified exceptions, an initial purchase order was made in September, but the ultimate transaction was paid to a separate vendor than the original purchase order, and this obligation was incurred in November 2023. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 22 NORTH NEWTON SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 2 CFR 200.403(h) states: "Cost must be incurred during the approved budget period. The Federal awarding agency is authorized, at its discretion, to waive prior written approvals to carry forward unobligated balances to subsequent budget periods pursuant to § 200.308(e)(3)." 34 CFR 76.707 states in part: ". . . If the obligation is for- . . . (d) Performance of work other than personal services. . . . The obligation is made- On the date on which the State or subgrantee makes a binding written commitment to acquire the property. . . ." 2 CFR 200.1 states in part: ". . . Period of Performance means the total estimated time interval between the start of an initial Federal award and the planned end date . . ." 36 CFR 76.709(a) states: "If a State or a subgrantee does not obligate all of its grant or subgrant funds by the end of the fiscal year for which Congress appropriated the funds, it may obligate the remaining funds during a carryover period of one additional fiscal year." Cause Management had established an initial obligation date that occurred in September of the second fiscal year but modified the final vendor for payment. The new obligation occurred after the period in which the School Corporation was allowed to incur the expense. Effect If funds are not obligated by the end of the specified date, the grantor agency is not obligated to reimburse the School Corporation for costs incurred. This may indicate that the funding that was reimbursed, which incurred outside of the period of performance, will need to be repaid to the grantor agency, and the School Corporation will then need to support the costs with nonfederal funding. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure that no costs are incurred after the September 30 deadline and to ensure compliance with the grant agreement and the Period of Performance compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-003 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA)- Earmarking Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, COVID-19 - Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants, COVID-19 - Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.173 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 21611-054-PN01, 22611-054PN01, 22619-054-PN01, 22611-054-ARP, 22619-054-ARP Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context The School Corporation is a member of the Wabash-Miami Area Programs for Exceptional Children (Cooperative). During fiscal years 2022-2023 and 2023-2024, the Cooperative operated the special education programs and spent the federal money on behalf of all its members. As the grant agreements were between the Indiana Department of Education and each member school, the School Corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. The School Corporation did not have internal controls in place to ensure that the Cooperative complied with the earmarking requirements. The Cooperative did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that the required level of expenditures for nonpublic school students with disabilities was met for each member school. The Cooperative did not have effective internal controls to ensure nonpublic school expenditures were appropriately identified and reported. The nonpublic expenditures spent did not meet the earmarking requirements for grant award numbers 21611-054-PN01, 22611-054-PN01, 22619-054-PN01, 22611-054-ARP, and 22619-054-ARP. Total grant expenditures were posted as expended. The nonpublic proportionate share expenditures for each member school were determined by applying a percentage based on the total grant award to the nonpublic school total expenditures. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were isolated to the 21611-054-PN01, 22611-054-PN01, 22619-054-PN01, 22611-054-ARP, and 22619-054-ARP grant awards. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: . . . "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 2 CFR 200.208(b) states in part: "The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may adjust specific Federal award conditions as needed . . ." 511 IAC 7-34-7(b) states: "The public agency, in providing special education and related services to students in nonpublic schools must expend at least an amount that is the same proportion of the public agency total subgrant under 20 U.S.C. 1411(f) as the number of nonpublic school students with disabilities, who are enrolled by their parents in nonpublic schools within its boundaries, is to the total number of students with disabilities of the same age range." Cause Through inquiry of management, they were unaware of the requirements to track nonpublic proportionate share expenditures directly for each member school. The Cooperative did implement new processes and procedures to ensure expenditures were tracked by each member school starting with the 2024 grants, and these grants were still ongoing during the audit period. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the Cooperative was unable to track expenditures for nonpublic services for each member school. Consequently, the amounts requested for reimbursement were not supported by actual expenditures but rather a percentage based on the budget per member school. Because of this, expenditures were not accurately reported to the oversight agency. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation Management of the Cooperative should develop written policies and procedures which would require tracking of actual nonpublic proportionate share expenditures by member school. Documentation should be maintained to show how these expenditures are being tracked to ensure compliance with the Earmarking requirements. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-003 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA)- Earmarking Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, COVID-19 - Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants, COVID-19 - Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.173 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 21611-054-PN01, 22611-054PN01, 22619-054-PN01, 22611-054-ARP, 22619-054-ARP Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context The School Corporation is a member of the Wabash-Miami Area Programs for Exceptional Children (Cooperative). During fiscal years 2022-2023 and 2023-2024, the Cooperative operated the special education programs and spent the federal money on behalf of all its members. As the grant agreements were between the Indiana Department of Education and each member school, the School Corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. The School Corporation did not have internal controls in place to ensure that the Cooperative complied with the earmarking requirements. The Cooperative did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that the required level of expenditures for nonpublic school students with disabilities was met for each member school. The Cooperative did not have effective internal controls to ensure nonpublic school expenditures were appropriately identified and reported. The nonpublic expenditures spent did not meet the earmarking requirements for grant award numbers 21611-054-PN01, 22611-054-PN01, 22619-054-PN01, 22611-054-ARP, and 22619-054-ARP. Total grant expenditures were posted as expended. The nonpublic proportionate share expenditures for each member school were determined by applying a percentage based on the total grant award to the nonpublic school total expenditures. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were isolated to the 21611-054-PN01, 22611-054-PN01, 22619-054-PN01, 22611-054-ARP, and 22619-054-ARP grant awards. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: . . . "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 2 CFR 200.208(b) states in part: "The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may adjust specific Federal award conditions as needed . . ." 511 IAC 7-34-7(b) states: "The public agency, in providing special education and related services to students in nonpublic schools must expend at least an amount that is the same proportion of the public agency total subgrant under 20 U.S.C. 1411(f) as the number of nonpublic school students with disabilities, who are enrolled by their parents in nonpublic schools within its boundaries, is to the total number of students with disabilities of the same age range." Cause Through inquiry of management, they were unaware of the requirements to track nonpublic proportionate share expenditures directly for each member school. The Cooperative did implement new processes and procedures to ensure expenditures were tracked by each member school starting with the 2024 grants, and these grants were still ongoing during the audit period. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the Cooperative was unable to track expenditures for nonpublic services for each member school. Consequently, the amounts requested for reimbursement were not supported by actual expenditures but rather a percentage based on the budget per member school. Because of this, expenditures were not accurately reported to the oversight agency. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation Management of the Cooperative should develop written policies and procedures which would require tracking of actual nonpublic proportionate share expenditures by member school. Documentation should be maintained to show how these expenditures are being tracked to ensure compliance with the Earmarking requirements. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-003 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA)- Earmarking Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, COVID-19 - Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants, COVID-19 - Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.173 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 21611-054-PN01, 22611-054PN01, 22619-054-PN01, 22611-054-ARP, 22619-054-ARP Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context The School Corporation is a member of the Wabash-Miami Area Programs for Exceptional Children (Cooperative). During fiscal years 2022-2023 and 2023-2024, the Cooperative operated the special education programs and spent the federal money on behalf of all its members. As the grant agreements were between the Indiana Department of Education and each member school, the School Corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. The School Corporation did not have internal controls in place to ensure that the Cooperative complied with the earmarking requirements. The Cooperative did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that the required level of expenditures for nonpublic school students with disabilities was met for each member school. The Cooperative did not have effective internal controls to ensure nonpublic school expenditures were appropriately identified and reported. The nonpublic expenditures spent did not meet the earmarking requirements for grant award numbers 21611-054-PN01, 22611-054-PN01, 22619-054-PN01, 22611-054-ARP, and 22619-054-ARP. Total grant expenditures were posted as expended. The nonpublic proportionate share expenditures for each member school were determined by applying a percentage based on the total grant award to the nonpublic school total expenditures. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were isolated to the 21611-054-PN01, 22611-054-PN01, 22619-054-PN01, 22611-054-ARP, and 22619-054-ARP grant awards. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: . . . "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 2 CFR 200.208(b) states in part: "The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may adjust specific Federal award conditions as needed . . ." 511 IAC 7-34-7(b) states: "The public agency, in providing special education and related services to students in nonpublic schools must expend at least an amount that is the same proportion of the public agency total subgrant under 20 U.S.C. 1411(f) as the number of nonpublic school students with disabilities, who are enrolled by their parents in nonpublic schools within its boundaries, is to the total number of students with disabilities of the same age range." Cause Through inquiry of management, they were unaware of the requirements to track nonpublic proportionate share expenditures directly for each member school. The Cooperative did implement new processes and procedures to ensure expenditures were tracked by each member school starting with the 2024 grants, and these grants were still ongoing during the audit period. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the Cooperative was unable to track expenditures for nonpublic services for each member school. Consequently, the amounts requested for reimbursement were not supported by actual expenditures but rather a percentage based on the budget per member school. Because of this, expenditures were not accurately reported to the oversight agency. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation Management of the Cooperative should develop written policies and procedures which would require tracking of actual nonpublic proportionate share expenditures by member school. Documentation should be maintained to show how these expenditures are being tracked to ensure compliance with the Earmarking requirements. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-003 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA)- Earmarking Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, COVID-19 - Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants, COVID-19 - Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.173 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 21611-054-PN01, 22611-054PN01, 22619-054-PN01, 22611-054-ARP, 22619-054-ARP Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context The School Corporation is a member of the Wabash-Miami Area Programs for Exceptional Children (Cooperative). During fiscal years 2022-2023 and 2023-2024, the Cooperative operated the special education programs and spent the federal money on behalf of all its members. As the grant agreements were between the Indiana Department of Education and each member school, the School Corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. The School Corporation did not have internal controls in place to ensure that the Cooperative complied with the earmarking requirements. The Cooperative did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that the required level of expenditures for nonpublic school students with disabilities was met for each member school. The Cooperative did not have effective internal controls to ensure nonpublic school expenditures were appropriately identified and reported. The nonpublic expenditures spent did not meet the earmarking requirements for grant award numbers 21611-054-PN01, 22611-054-PN01, 22619-054-PN01, 22611-054-ARP, and 22619-054-ARP. Total grant expenditures were posted as expended. The nonpublic proportionate share expenditures for each member school were determined by applying a percentage based on the total grant award to the nonpublic school total expenditures. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were isolated to the 21611-054-PN01, 22611-054-PN01, 22619-054-PN01, 22611-054-ARP, and 22619-054-ARP grant awards. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: . . . "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 2 CFR 200.208(b) states in part: "The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may adjust specific Federal award conditions as needed . . ." 511 IAC 7-34-7(b) states: "The public agency, in providing special education and related services to students in nonpublic schools must expend at least an amount that is the same proportion of the public agency total subgrant under 20 U.S.C. 1411(f) as the number of nonpublic school students with disabilities, who are enrolled by their parents in nonpublic schools within its boundaries, is to the total number of students with disabilities of the same age range." Cause Through inquiry of management, they were unaware of the requirements to track nonpublic proportionate share expenditures directly for each member school. The Cooperative did implement new processes and procedures to ensure expenditures were tracked by each member school starting with the 2024 grants, and these grants were still ongoing during the audit period. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the Cooperative was unable to track expenditures for nonpublic services for each member school. Consequently, the amounts requested for reimbursement were not supported by actual expenditures but rather a percentage based on the budget per member school. Because of this, expenditures were not accurately reported to the oversight agency. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation Management of the Cooperative should develop written policies and procedures which would require tracking of actual nonpublic proportionate share expenditures by member school. Documentation should be maintained to show how these expenditures are being tracked to ensure compliance with the Earmarking requirements. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-003 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA)- Earmarking Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, COVID-19 - Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants, COVID-19 - Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.173 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 21611-054-PN01, 22611-054PN01, 22619-054-PN01, 22611-054-ARP, 22619-054-ARP Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context The School Corporation is a member of the Wabash-Miami Area Programs for Exceptional Children (Cooperative). During fiscal years 2022-2023 and 2023-2024, the Cooperative operated the special education programs and spent the federal money on behalf of all its members. As the grant agreements were between the Indiana Department of Education and each member school, the School Corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. The School Corporation did not have internal controls in place to ensure that the Cooperative complied with the earmarking requirements. The Cooperative did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that the required level of expenditures for nonpublic school students with disabilities was met for each member school. The Cooperative did not have effective internal controls to ensure nonpublic school expenditures were appropriately identified and reported. The nonpublic expenditures spent did not meet the earmarking requirements for grant award numbers 21611-054-PN01, 22611-054-PN01, 22619-054-PN01, 22611-054-ARP, and 22619-054-ARP. Total grant expenditures were posted as expended. The nonpublic proportionate share expenditures for each member school were determined by applying a percentage based on the total grant award to the nonpublic school total expenditures. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were isolated to the 21611-054-PN01, 22611-054-PN01, 22619-054-PN01, 22611-054-ARP, and 22619-054-ARP grant awards. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: . . . "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 2 CFR 200.208(b) states in part: "The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may adjust specific Federal award conditions as needed . . ." 511 IAC 7-34-7(b) states: "The public agency, in providing special education and related services to students in nonpublic schools must expend at least an amount that is the same proportion of the public agency total subgrant under 20 U.S.C. 1411(f) as the number of nonpublic school students with disabilities, who are enrolled by their parents in nonpublic schools within its boundaries, is to the total number of students with disabilities of the same age range." Cause Through inquiry of management, they were unaware of the requirements to track nonpublic proportionate share expenditures directly for each member school. The Cooperative did implement new processes and procedures to ensure expenditures were tracked by each member school starting with the 2024 grants, and these grants were still ongoing during the audit period. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the Cooperative was unable to track expenditures for nonpublic services for each member school. Consequently, the amounts requested for reimbursement were not supported by actual expenditures but rather a percentage based on the budget per member school. Because of this, expenditures were not accurately reported to the oversight agency. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation Management of the Cooperative should develop written policies and procedures which would require tracking of actual nonpublic proportionate share expenditures by member school. Documentation should be maintained to show how these expenditures are being tracked to ensure compliance with the Earmarking requirements. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-003 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA)- Earmarking Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, COVID-19 - Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants, COVID-19 - Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.173 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 21611-054-PN01, 22611-054PN01, 22619-054-PN01, 22611-054-ARP, 22619-054-ARP Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context The School Corporation is a member of the Wabash-Miami Area Programs for Exceptional Children (Cooperative). During fiscal years 2022-2023 and 2023-2024, the Cooperative operated the special education programs and spent the federal money on behalf of all its members. As the grant agreements were between the Indiana Department of Education and each member school, the School Corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. The School Corporation did not have internal controls in place to ensure that the Cooperative complied with the earmarking requirements. The Cooperative did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that the required level of expenditures for nonpublic school students with disabilities was met for each member school. The Cooperative did not have effective internal controls to ensure nonpublic school expenditures were appropriately identified and reported. The nonpublic expenditures spent did not meet the earmarking requirements for grant award numbers 21611-054-PN01, 22611-054-PN01, 22619-054-PN01, 22611-054-ARP, and 22619-054-ARP. Total grant expenditures were posted as expended. The nonpublic proportionate share expenditures for each member school were determined by applying a percentage based on the total grant award to the nonpublic school total expenditures. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were isolated to the 21611-054-PN01, 22611-054-PN01, 22619-054-PN01, 22611-054-ARP, and 22619-054-ARP grant awards. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: . . . "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 2 CFR 200.208(b) states in part: "The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may adjust specific Federal award conditions as needed . . ." 511 IAC 7-34-7(b) states: "The public agency, in providing special education and related services to students in nonpublic schools must expend at least an amount that is the same proportion of the public agency total subgrant under 20 U.S.C. 1411(f) as the number of nonpublic school students with disabilities, who are enrolled by their parents in nonpublic schools within its boundaries, is to the total number of students with disabilities of the same age range." Cause Through inquiry of management, they were unaware of the requirements to track nonpublic proportionate share expenditures directly for each member school. The Cooperative did implement new processes and procedures to ensure expenditures were tracked by each member school starting with the 2024 grants, and these grants were still ongoing during the audit period. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the Cooperative was unable to track expenditures for nonpublic services for each member school. Consequently, the amounts requested for reimbursement were not supported by actual expenditures but rather a percentage based on the budget per member school. Because of this, expenditures were not accurately reported to the oversight agency. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation Management of the Cooperative should develop written policies and procedures which would require tracking of actual nonpublic proportionate share expenditures by member school. Documentation should be maintained to show how these expenditures are being tracked to ensure compliance with the Earmarking requirements. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-003 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA)- Earmarking Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, COVID-19 - Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants, COVID-19 - Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.173 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 21611-054-PN01, 22611-054PN01, 22619-054-PN01, 22611-054-ARP, 22619-054-ARP Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context The School Corporation is a member of the Wabash-Miami Area Programs for Exceptional Children (Cooperative). During fiscal years 2022-2023 and 2023-2024, the Cooperative operated the special education programs and spent the federal money on behalf of all its members. As the grant agreements were between the Indiana Department of Education and each member school, the School Corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. The School Corporation did not have internal controls in place to ensure that the Cooperative complied with the earmarking requirements. The Cooperative did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that the required level of expenditures for nonpublic school students with disabilities was met for each member school. The Cooperative did not have effective internal controls to ensure nonpublic school expenditures were appropriately identified and reported. The nonpublic expenditures spent did not meet the earmarking requirements for grant award numbers 21611-054-PN01, 22611-054-PN01, 22619-054-PN01, 22611-054-ARP, and 22619-054-ARP. Total grant expenditures were posted as expended. The nonpublic proportionate share expenditures for each member school were determined by applying a percentage based on the total grant award to the nonpublic school total expenditures. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were isolated to the 21611-054-PN01, 22611-054-PN01, 22619-054-PN01, 22611-054-ARP, and 22619-054-ARP grant awards. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: . . . "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 2 CFR 200.208(b) states in part: "The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may adjust specific Federal award conditions as needed . . ." 511 IAC 7-34-7(b) states: "The public agency, in providing special education and related services to students in nonpublic schools must expend at least an amount that is the same proportion of the public agency total subgrant under 20 U.S.C. 1411(f) as the number of nonpublic school students with disabilities, who are enrolled by their parents in nonpublic schools within its boundaries, is to the total number of students with disabilities of the same age range." Cause Through inquiry of management, they were unaware of the requirements to track nonpublic proportionate share expenditures directly for each member school. The Cooperative did implement new processes and procedures to ensure expenditures were tracked by each member school starting with the 2024 grants, and these grants were still ongoing during the audit period. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the Cooperative was unable to track expenditures for nonpublic services for each member school. Consequently, the amounts requested for reimbursement were not supported by actual expenditures but rather a percentage based on the budget per member school. Because of this, expenditures were not accurately reported to the oversight agency. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation Management of the Cooperative should develop written policies and procedures which would require tracking of actual nonpublic proportionate share expenditures by member school. Documentation should be maintained to show how these expenditures are being tracked to ensure compliance with the Earmarking requirements. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-003 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA)- Earmarking Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, COVID-19 - Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants, COVID-19 - Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.173 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 21611-054-PN01, 22611-054PN01, 22619-054-PN01, 22611-054-ARP, 22619-054-ARP Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context The School Corporation is a member of the Wabash-Miami Area Programs for Exceptional Children (Cooperative). During fiscal years 2022-2023 and 2023-2024, the Cooperative operated the special education programs and spent the federal money on behalf of all its members. As the grant agreements were between the Indiana Department of Education and each member school, the School Corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. The School Corporation did not have internal controls in place to ensure that the Cooperative complied with the earmarking requirements. The Cooperative did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that the required level of expenditures for nonpublic school students with disabilities was met for each member school. The Cooperative did not have effective internal controls to ensure nonpublic school expenditures were appropriately identified and reported. The nonpublic expenditures spent did not meet the earmarking requirements for grant award numbers 21611-054-PN01, 22611-054-PN01, 22619-054-PN01, 22611-054-ARP, and 22619-054-ARP. Total grant expenditures were posted as expended. The nonpublic proportionate share expenditures for each member school were determined by applying a percentage based on the total grant award to the nonpublic school total expenditures. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were isolated to the 21611-054-PN01, 22611-054-PN01, 22619-054-PN01, 22611-054-ARP, and 22619-054-ARP grant awards. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: . . . "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 2 CFR 200.208(b) states in part: "The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may adjust specific Federal award conditions as needed . . ." 511 IAC 7-34-7(b) states: "The public agency, in providing special education and related services to students in nonpublic schools must expend at least an amount that is the same proportion of the public agency total subgrant under 20 U.S.C. 1411(f) as the number of nonpublic school students with disabilities, who are enrolled by their parents in nonpublic schools within its boundaries, is to the total number of students with disabilities of the same age range." Cause Through inquiry of management, they were unaware of the requirements to track nonpublic proportionate share expenditures directly for each member school. The Cooperative did implement new processes and procedures to ensure expenditures were tracked by each member school starting with the 2024 grants, and these grants were still ongoing during the audit period. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the Cooperative was unable to track expenditures for nonpublic services for each member school. Consequently, the amounts requested for reimbursement were not supported by actual expenditures but rather a percentage based on the budget per member school. Because of this, expenditures were not accurately reported to the oversight agency. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation Management of the Cooperative should develop written policies and procedures which would require tracking of actual nonpublic proportionate share expenditures by member school. Documentation should be maintained to show how these expenditures are being tracked to ensure compliance with the Earmarking requirements. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-004 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Level of Effort Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.173 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 21611-054-PN01, 22611-054-PN01, 22619-054-PN01, 22611-054-ARP, 22619-054-ARP, 23611-054-PN01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context The School Corporation was required to submit a Local Educational Agency (LEA) Maintenance of Effort (MOE) Calculator workbook to the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE) each year beginning with the fiscal year 2021-2022 grant. The MOE was based on the expenditure information submitted on the Form 9 for the prior fiscal year. The Form 9 (financial) data was submitted by the School Corporation to the IDOE semiannually. The data reported included the School Corporation's expenditures recorded during that period. To verify amounts used in their computation were derived from the books and records of the School Corporation, costs were reviewed to ensure they were properly classified as to fund, account, and object code and reported correctly on the Form 9. In 2020-2021 and 2021-2022, 25 transactions were sampled each year to ensure the disbursements were posted to the proper fund, account, and object code. For 5 of the 25 transactions selected in 2020-2021, as well as 4 of the 25 transactions selected in 2021-2022, appropriate supporting documentation was not provided for audit. As a result, the 9 disbursements could not be verified as to whether they were posted to the proper fund, account, and object code. The School Corporation was unable to provide documentation to support the calculation for Level of Effort included within the grant applications. In addition, the expenditure categories were not consistent with the prior grant application, and several of the expenditure categories reported did not agree to the financial records. The School Corporation did not have an oversight process in place to ensure that expenditures were classified properly to the correct fund, account, and object codes. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 34 CFR 300.203 states in part: "(a) Eligibility Standard. (1) For purposes of establishing the LEA's eligibility for an award for a fiscal year, the SEA must determine that the LEA budgets, for the education of children with disabilities, at least the same amount, from at least one of the following sources, as the LEA spent for that purpose from the same source for the most recent fiscal year for which information is available: (i) Local funds only; (ii) The combination of State and local funds; (iii) Local funds only on a per capita basis; or (iv) The combination of State and local funds on a per capita basis. . . . (b) Compliance Standard. (1) Except as provided in §§ 300.204 and 300.205, funds provided to an LEA under Part B of the Act must not be used to reduce the level of expenditures for the education of children with disabilities made by the LEA from local funds below the level of those expenditures for the preceding fiscal year. (2) An LEA meets this standard if it does not reduce the level of expenditures for the education of children with disabilities made by the LEA from at least one of the following sources below the level of those expenditures from the same source for the preceding fiscal year, except as provided in §§ 300.204 and 300.205: (i) Local funds only; (ii) The combination of State and local funds; (iii) Local funds only on a per capita basis; or (iv) The combination of State and local funds on a per capita basis. . . ." Cause The school has updated its financial system and can't produce reports from the time period tested to verify the expenditures were properly classified. Effect The School Corporation could have classified expenditures improperly and the MOE calculation could be incorrect. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation design and implement a proper system of internal controls, including policies and procedures that would provide segregation of duties to ensure appropriate reviews, approvals, and oversight are taking place to ensure compliance. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.