2024-003 Document Policies and Procedures over Federal Awards (Significant Deficiency) Cluster/Program: All Federal Programs Type of Finding: Compliance – Other Matters Internal Control over Compliance – Significant Deficiency Criteria or Specific Requirement: OMB’s Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (UG) established significant requirements related to Federal awards. The requirements stipulate that federal award recipients must document their policies and procedures over certain aspects of financial program management. Specifically, written policies are required for the following: • Determination of allowable costs • Conflict of interest • Employee travel • Cash Management • Equipment and inventory • Procurement and Suspension and Debarment • Time and effort reporting; and • Subrecipient monitoring and management. Federal regulations 2 CFR 200.303 states, the Town, as a recipient of Federal funds, must establish and maintain effective internal controls over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition: The Town has not formalized written policies and procedures related to Federal awards as required under Uniform Guidance. Cause: Weaknesses in the formal documentation of internal controls. Effect: There are no formal policies related to federal grant activity noted above. Questioned Costs: There are no questioned costs because of this finding as there are no costs directly associated with this compliance requirement. Identification as Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: The Town should ensure that written policies and procedures are compiled and adopted as soon as practicable to ensure compliance with the Uniform Guidance. Views of Responsible Officials: Management’s views and corrective action plan is included at the end of this report.
2024-003 Document Policies and Procedures over Federal Awards (Significant Deficiency) Cluster/Program: All Federal Programs Type of Finding: Compliance – Other Matters Internal Control over Compliance – Significant Deficiency Criteria or Specific Requirement: OMB’s Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (UG) established significant requirements related to Federal awards. The requirements stipulate that federal award recipients must document their policies and procedures over certain aspects of financial program management. Specifically, written policies are required for the following: • Determination of allowable costs • Conflict of interest • Employee travel • Cash Management • Equipment and inventory • Procurement and Suspension and Debarment • Time and effort reporting; and • Subrecipient monitoring and management. Federal regulations 2 CFR 200.303 states, the Town, as a recipient of Federal funds, must establish and maintain effective internal controls over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition: The Town has not formalized written policies and procedures related to Federal awards as required under Uniform Guidance. Cause: Weaknesses in the formal documentation of internal controls. Effect: There are no formal policies related to federal grant activity noted above. Questioned Costs: There are no questioned costs because of this finding as there are no costs directly associated with this compliance requirement. Identification as Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: The Town should ensure that written policies and procedures are compiled and adopted as soon as practicable to ensure compliance with the Uniform Guidance. Views of Responsible Officials: Management’s views and corrective action plan is included at the end of this report.
2024-003 Document Policies and Procedures over Federal Awards (Significant Deficiency) Cluster/Program: All Federal Programs Type of Finding: Compliance – Other Matters Internal Control over Compliance – Significant Deficiency Criteria or Specific Requirement: OMB’s Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (UG) established significant requirements related to Federal awards. The requirements stipulate that federal award recipients must document their policies and procedures over certain aspects of financial program management. Specifically, written policies are required for the following: • Determination of allowable costs • Conflict of interest • Employee travel • Cash Management • Equipment and inventory • Procurement and Suspension and Debarment • Time and effort reporting; and • Subrecipient monitoring and management. Federal regulations 2 CFR 200.303 states, the Town, as a recipient of Federal funds, must establish and maintain effective internal controls over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition: The Town has not formalized written policies and procedures related to Federal awards as required under Uniform Guidance. Cause: Weaknesses in the formal documentation of internal controls. Effect: There are no formal policies related to federal grant activity noted above. Questioned Costs: There are no questioned costs because of this finding as there are no costs directly associated with this compliance requirement. Identification as Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: The Town should ensure that written policies and procedures are compiled and adopted as soon as practicable to ensure compliance with the Uniform Guidance. Views of Responsible Officials: Management’s views and corrective action plan is included at the end of this report.
2024-003 Document Policies and Procedures over Federal Awards (Significant Deficiency) Cluster/Program: All Federal Programs Type of Finding: Compliance – Other Matters Internal Control over Compliance – Significant Deficiency Criteria or Specific Requirement: OMB’s Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (UG) established significant requirements related to Federal awards. The requirements stipulate that federal award recipients must document their policies and procedures over certain aspects of financial program management. Specifically, written policies are required for the following: • Determination of allowable costs • Conflict of interest • Employee travel • Cash Management • Equipment and inventory • Procurement and Suspension and Debarment • Time and effort reporting; and • Subrecipient monitoring and management. Federal regulations 2 CFR 200.303 states, the Town, as a recipient of Federal funds, must establish and maintain effective internal controls over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition: The Town has not formalized written policies and procedures related to Federal awards as required under Uniform Guidance. Cause: Weaknesses in the formal documentation of internal controls. Effect: There are no formal policies related to federal grant activity noted above. Questioned Costs: There are no questioned costs because of this finding as there are no costs directly associated with this compliance requirement. Identification as Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: The Town should ensure that written policies and procedures are compiled and adopted as soon as practicable to ensure compliance with the Uniform Guidance. Views of Responsible Officials: Management’s views and corrective action plan is included at the end of this report.
2024-003 Document Policies and Procedures over Federal Awards (Significant Deficiency) Cluster/Program: All Federal Programs Type of Finding: Compliance – Other Matters Internal Control over Compliance – Significant Deficiency Criteria or Specific Requirement: OMB’s Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (UG) established significant requirements related to Federal awards. The requirements stipulate that federal award recipients must document their policies and procedures over certain aspects of financial program management. Specifically, written policies are required for the following: • Determination of allowable costs • Conflict of interest • Employee travel • Cash Management • Equipment and inventory • Procurement and Suspension and Debarment • Time and effort reporting; and • Subrecipient monitoring and management. Federal regulations 2 CFR 200.303 states, the Town, as a recipient of Federal funds, must establish and maintain effective internal controls over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition: The Town has not formalized written policies and procedures related to Federal awards as required under Uniform Guidance. Cause: Weaknesses in the formal documentation of internal controls. Effect: There are no formal policies related to federal grant activity noted above. Questioned Costs: There are no questioned costs because of this finding as there are no costs directly associated with this compliance requirement. Identification as Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: The Town should ensure that written policies and procedures are compiled and adopted as soon as practicable to ensure compliance with the Uniform Guidance. Views of Responsible Officials: Management’s views and corrective action plan is included at the end of this report.
2024-003 Document Policies and Procedures over Federal Awards (Significant Deficiency) Cluster/Program: All Federal Programs Type of Finding: Compliance – Other Matters Internal Control over Compliance – Significant Deficiency Criteria or Specific Requirement: OMB’s Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (UG) established significant requirements related to Federal awards. The requirements stipulate that federal award recipients must document their policies and procedures over certain aspects of financial program management. Specifically, written policies are required for the following: • Determination of allowable costs • Conflict of interest • Employee travel • Cash Management • Equipment and inventory • Procurement and Suspension and Debarment • Time and effort reporting; and • Subrecipient monitoring and management. Federal regulations 2 CFR 200.303 states, the Town, as a recipient of Federal funds, must establish and maintain effective internal controls over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition: The Town has not formalized written policies and procedures related to Federal awards as required under Uniform Guidance. Cause: Weaknesses in the formal documentation of internal controls. Effect: There are no formal policies related to federal grant activity noted above. Questioned Costs: There are no questioned costs because of this finding as there are no costs directly associated with this compliance requirement. Identification as Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: The Town should ensure that written policies and procedures are compiled and adopted as soon as practicable to ensure compliance with the Uniform Guidance. Views of Responsible Officials: Management’s views and corrective action plan is included at the end of this report.
2024-003 Document Policies and Procedures over Federal Awards (Significant Deficiency) Cluster/Program: All Federal Programs Type of Finding: Compliance – Other Matters Internal Control over Compliance – Significant Deficiency Criteria or Specific Requirement: OMB’s Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (UG) established significant requirements related to Federal awards. The requirements stipulate that federal award recipients must document their policies and procedures over certain aspects of financial program management. Specifically, written policies are required for the following: • Determination of allowable costs • Conflict of interest • Employee travel • Cash Management • Equipment and inventory • Procurement and Suspension and Debarment • Time and effort reporting; and • Subrecipient monitoring and management. Federal regulations 2 CFR 200.303 states, the Town, as a recipient of Federal funds, must establish and maintain effective internal controls over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition: The Town has not formalized written policies and procedures related to Federal awards as required under Uniform Guidance. Cause: Weaknesses in the formal documentation of internal controls. Effect: There are no formal policies related to federal grant activity noted above. Questioned Costs: There are no questioned costs because of this finding as there are no costs directly associated with this compliance requirement. Identification as Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: The Town should ensure that written policies and procedures are compiled and adopted as soon as practicable to ensure compliance with the Uniform Guidance. Views of Responsible Officials: Management’s views and corrective action plan is included at the end of this report.
Information on the federal program: Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) – Procurement Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listing Number: 84.027 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): H027A220084, H027A230084 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Finding: Significant Deficiency Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). 2 CFR 200.318(a) (Uniform Guidance) states: "The non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable State, local, and tribal laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal law and the standards identified in this part." 2 CFR 200.318(a) (Revised Uniform Guidance) states: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must confirm to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327." 2 CFR 200.318(i) states: "The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price." 2 CFR 200.320(b) (Uniform Guidance) states: "Procurement by small purchase procedures. Small purchase procedures are those relatively simple and informal procurement methods for securing services, supplies, or other property that do not cost more than the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources." 2 CFR 200.320 (Revised Uniform Guidance) states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non- Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases – (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. Indiana Code 5-22-8-3 states in part: "(a) This section applies only if the purchasing agent expects the purchase to be: (1) at least fifty thousand dollars ($50,000); and (2) not more than one hundred fifty thousand dollars ($150,000). . . . (d) If the purchasing agent receives a satisfactory quote, the purchasing agent shall award a contract to the lowest responsible and responsive offeror for each line or class of supplies required. . . ." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000. However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold of $150,000 or less for when small purchase procedures may be used. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. Cause: Management had not developed an effective system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish an effective system of internal controls, as well as adequately document the procurement process for small purchases, prevented the determination of the School Corporation's compliance with the procurement requirements of the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: The School Corporation did not obtain price or rate quotes for one out of four vendors tested that were less than the simplified acquisition threshold of $150,000 but exceeded the $10,000 micro-purchase threshold. Documentation of vendor contract, bids or the School Corporation's process and rationale for the chosen vendor was not available for audit. Further, the School Corporation could not provide evidence that a suspension and debarment check had been performed on the vendor prior to entering into contract. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: Yes. See finding 2022-006 in the prior audit report. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure that documentation will be maintained and the system of internal controls outlines how the School Corporation will comply with their procurement policy, requirements of the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
Information on the federal program: Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) – Procurement Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listing Number: 84.027 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): H027A220084, H027A230084 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Finding: Significant Deficiency Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). 2 CFR 200.318(a) (Uniform Guidance) states: "The non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable State, local, and tribal laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal law and the standards identified in this part." 2 CFR 200.318(a) (Revised Uniform Guidance) states: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must confirm to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327." 2 CFR 200.318(i) states: "The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price." 2 CFR 200.320(b) (Uniform Guidance) states: "Procurement by small purchase procedures. Small purchase procedures are those relatively simple and informal procurement methods for securing services, supplies, or other property that do not cost more than the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources." 2 CFR 200.320 (Revised Uniform Guidance) states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non- Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases – (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. Indiana Code 5-22-8-3 states in part: "(a) This section applies only if the purchasing agent expects the purchase to be: (1) at least fifty thousand dollars ($50,000); and (2) not more than one hundred fifty thousand dollars ($150,000). . . . (d) If the purchasing agent receives a satisfactory quote, the purchasing agent shall award a contract to the lowest responsible and responsive offeror for each line or class of supplies required. . . ." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000. However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold of $150,000 or less for when small purchase procedures may be used. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. Cause: Management had not developed an effective system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish an effective system of internal controls, as well as adequately document the procurement process for small purchases, prevented the determination of the School Corporation's compliance with the procurement requirements of the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: The School Corporation did not obtain price or rate quotes for one out of four vendors tested that were less than the simplified acquisition threshold of $150,000 but exceeded the $10,000 micro-purchase threshold. Documentation of vendor contract, bids or the School Corporation's process and rationale for the chosen vendor was not available for audit. Further, the School Corporation could not provide evidence that a suspension and debarment check had been performed on the vendor prior to entering into contract. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: Yes. See finding 2022-006 in the prior audit report. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure that documentation will be maintained and the system of internal controls outlines how the School Corporation will comply with their procurement policy, requirements of the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
Information on the federal program: Subject: Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies – Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies Assistance Listing Number: 84.010A Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S010A210014, S010A220014, S010A230014 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Finding: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." Condition: An effective system of internal controls was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirement. Cause: Management had not developed an effective system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish an effective system of internal controls, as well as adequately document costs, enabled noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: We noted that for 11 payroll claims in a sample of 60, the School Corporation was not able to provide semi-annual certifications or support that the personnel were approved to be paid with Title I funds. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure that documentation will be maintained and comply with the grant agreement and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
Information on the federal program: Subject: Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies – Eligibility Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies Assistance Listing Number: 84.010A Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S010A210014, S010A220014, S010A230014 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Eligibility Audit Finding: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." Condition: An effective system of internal controls was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the eligibility compliance requirement. Cause: Management had not developed an effective system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the eligibility compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: During the testing of eligibility, we noted three out of 25 eligibility samples that were reported as free or reduced socioeconomic status to the Indiana Department of Education in the October 2022 data exchange count, but supporting documentation supported these students as a paid status. These three students should not have been reported as free or reduced socioeconomic status. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to review the applications submitted for free or reduced socioeconomic status to ensure the students are classified correctly within the system. We also recommend that management have a secondary review of the information submitted as part of the data exchange count to ensure the information is accurate and agrees to the underlying detail. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
Information on the federal program: Subject: Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies - Special Tests and Provisions - Annual Report Card/High School Graduation Rate Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies Assistance Listing Number: 84.010A Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S010A210014, S010A220014, S010A230014 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Special Tests and Provisions - Annual Report Card/High School Graduation Rate Audit Finding: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 20 USC 7801(23)(B) states: "To remove a student from a cohort, a school or local educational agency shall require documentation, or obtain documentation from the State educational agency, to confirm that the student has transferred out, emigrated to another country, or transferred to a prison or juvenile facility, or is deceased.” Condition: An effective internal control system was not designed or implemented at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Special Tests and Provisions - Annual Report Card, High School Graduation Rate compliance requirement. The School Corporation must report graduation rate data for all public high schools within the corporation using the four-year adjusted cohort rate. To remove a student from the cohort, the School Corporation must confirm the reason for removal in writing. Additionally, required documentation for each removal type must be retained by the School Corporation. Cause: Management had not designed or implemented a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the Special Tests and Provisions - Annual Report Card, High School Graduation Rate compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish an effective system of internal controls enabled noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Special Tests and Provisions - Annual Report Card, High School Graduation Rate compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: The School Corporation had not established internal controls to ensure required documentation to support the reason for a student's removal from the high school graduation cohort for mobility reasons was prepared, reviewed, and retained. For three of the eight students tested, the School Corporation was unable to provide documentation to support the removal of the student from the graduation cohort. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: Yes. See finding 2022-008 in the prior audit report. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure compliance and comply with the Special Tests and Provisions - Annual Report Card, High School Graduation Rate compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
Information on the federal program: Subject: Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies – Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies Assistance Listing Number: 84.010A Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S010A210014, S010A220014, S010A230014 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Finding: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." Condition: An effective system of internal controls was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirement. Cause: Management had not developed an effective system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish an effective system of internal controls, as well as adequately document costs, enabled noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: We noted that for 11 payroll claims in a sample of 60, the School Corporation was not able to provide semi-annual certifications or support that the personnel were approved to be paid with Title I funds. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure that documentation will be maintained and comply with the grant agreement and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
Information on the federal program: Subject: Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies – Eligibility Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies Assistance Listing Number: 84.010A Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S010A210014, S010A220014, S010A230014 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Eligibility Audit Finding: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." Condition: An effective system of internal controls was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the eligibility compliance requirement. Cause: Management had not developed an effective system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the eligibility compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: During the testing of eligibility, we noted three out of 25 eligibility samples that were reported as free or reduced socioeconomic status to the Indiana Department of Education in the October 2022 data exchange count, but supporting documentation supported these students as a paid status. These three students should not have been reported as free or reduced socioeconomic status. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to review the applications submitted for free or reduced socioeconomic status to ensure the students are classified correctly within the system. We also recommend that management have a secondary review of the information submitted as part of the data exchange count to ensure the information is accurate and agrees to the underlying detail. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
Information on the federal program: Subject: Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies - Special Tests and Provisions - Annual Report Card/High School Graduation Rate Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies Assistance Listing Number: 84.010A Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S010A210014, S010A220014, S010A230014 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Special Tests and Provisions - Annual Report Card/High School Graduation Rate Audit Finding: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 20 USC 7801(23)(B) states: "To remove a student from a cohort, a school or local educational agency shall require documentation, or obtain documentation from the State educational agency, to confirm that the student has transferred out, emigrated to another country, or transferred to a prison or juvenile facility, or is deceased.” Condition: An effective internal control system was not designed or implemented at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Special Tests and Provisions - Annual Report Card, High School Graduation Rate compliance requirement. The School Corporation must report graduation rate data for all public high schools within the corporation using the four-year adjusted cohort rate. To remove a student from the cohort, the School Corporation must confirm the reason for removal in writing. Additionally, required documentation for each removal type must be retained by the School Corporation. Cause: Management had not designed or implemented a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the Special Tests and Provisions - Annual Report Card, High School Graduation Rate compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish an effective system of internal controls enabled noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Special Tests and Provisions - Annual Report Card, High School Graduation Rate compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: The School Corporation had not established internal controls to ensure required documentation to support the reason for a student's removal from the high school graduation cohort for mobility reasons was prepared, reviewed, and retained. For three of the eight students tested, the School Corporation was unable to provide documentation to support the removal of the student from the graduation cohort. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: Yes. See finding 2022-008 in the prior audit report. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure compliance and comply with the Special Tests and Provisions - Annual Report Card, High School Graduation Rate compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
Information on the federal program: Subject: Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies – Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies Assistance Listing Number: 84.010A Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S010A210014, S010A220014, S010A230014 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Finding: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." Condition: An effective system of internal controls was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirement. Cause: Management had not developed an effective system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish an effective system of internal controls, as well as adequately document costs, enabled noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: We noted that for 11 payroll claims in a sample of 60, the School Corporation was not able to provide semi-annual certifications or support that the personnel were approved to be paid with Title I funds. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure that documentation will be maintained and comply with the grant agreement and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
Information on the federal program: Subject: Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies – Eligibility Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies Assistance Listing Number: 84.010A Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S010A210014, S010A220014, S010A230014 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Eligibility Audit Finding: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." Condition: An effective system of internal controls was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the eligibility compliance requirement. Cause: Management had not developed an effective system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the eligibility compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: During the testing of eligibility, we noted three out of 25 eligibility samples that were reported as free or reduced socioeconomic status to the Indiana Department of Education in the October 2022 data exchange count, but supporting documentation supported these students as a paid status. These three students should not have been reported as free or reduced socioeconomic status. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to review the applications submitted for free or reduced socioeconomic status to ensure the students are classified correctly within the system. We also recommend that management have a secondary review of the information submitted as part of the data exchange count to ensure the information is accurate and agrees to the underlying detail. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
Information on the federal program: Subject: Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies - Special Tests and Provisions - Annual Report Card/High School Graduation Rate Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies Assistance Listing Number: 84.010A Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S010A210014, S010A220014, S010A230014 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Special Tests and Provisions - Annual Report Card/High School Graduation Rate Audit Finding: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 20 USC 7801(23)(B) states: "To remove a student from a cohort, a school or local educational agency shall require documentation, or obtain documentation from the State educational agency, to confirm that the student has transferred out, emigrated to another country, or transferred to a prison or juvenile facility, or is deceased.” Condition: An effective internal control system was not designed or implemented at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Special Tests and Provisions - Annual Report Card, High School Graduation Rate compliance requirement. The School Corporation must report graduation rate data for all public high schools within the corporation using the four-year adjusted cohort rate. To remove a student from the cohort, the School Corporation must confirm the reason for removal in writing. Additionally, required documentation for each removal type must be retained by the School Corporation. Cause: Management had not designed or implemented a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the Special Tests and Provisions - Annual Report Card, High School Graduation Rate compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish an effective system of internal controls enabled noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Special Tests and Provisions - Annual Report Card, High School Graduation Rate compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: The School Corporation had not established internal controls to ensure required documentation to support the reason for a student's removal from the high school graduation cohort for mobility reasons was prepared, reviewed, and retained. For three of the eight students tested, the School Corporation was unable to provide documentation to support the removal of the student from the graduation cohort. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: Yes. See finding 2022-008 in the prior audit report. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure compliance and comply with the Special Tests and Provisions - Annual Report Card, High School Graduation Rate compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
Information on the federal program: Subject: Education Stabilization Fund (ESSER) – Internal Controls Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 – Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listing Number: 84.425C, 84.425D, 84.425U Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425D200013, S425D210013, S425U210013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Finding: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.302(b) states in part: "The financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for the following: (2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in §§ 200.328 Financial reporting . . . ." 34 CFR 76.722 states: "A State may require a subgrantee to submit reports in a manner and format that assists the State in complying with the requirements under 34 CFR 76.720 and in carrying out other responsibilities under the program." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirements. Cause: The School Corporation's management implemented a review control over the annual data reports, however, it was not sufficient enough to detect and prevent errors in annual data reports submitted to the Indiana Department of Education. Effect: Annual data reports submitted during the audit period to the Indiana Department of Education contained material errors compared to underlying transaction detail for the period reported. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: The School Corporation was required to submit Annual Data Reports to the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE) during the audit period to meet federal reporting requirements for ESSER grant awards. We noted that the ESSER I amount reported on the Year 3 report ($266,367) did not agree to the underlying expenditure record ($96,019) for the period of July 1, 2021 through June 30, 2022. Additionally, the ESSER II and ESSER III amount reported on the Year 2 report ($1,433,207, and $643,771, respectively) did not agree to the underlying expenditure records ($1,400,698, and $630,465 respectively) for the period of July 1, 2021 through June 30, 2022. We also noted that the ESSER II and ESSER III amounts reported on the Year 3 report ($4,291 and $1,522,378, respectively) did not agree to the underlying expenditure records ($4,590 and $1,774,722, respectively) for the period of July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023. Additionally, the School Corporation was not able to provide any support for the 288 full-time equivalent (FTE) positions on September 30, 2022, reported on the Year 2 CrossAct report or the 338 full-time equivalent (FTE) positions on September 30, 2023, reported on the Year 3 CrossAct report. Crowe also noted that the School Corporation reported 0 full-time equivalent (FTE) positions paid by ESSER on September 2023, but there were ESSER positions reported in the ESSER applications. Identification as a repeat finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend management review internal controls over the review of annual data reports to ensure the data to be submitted agrees to underlying transaction detail or other supporting documentation prior to the submission of the annual data report. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
Information on the federal program: Subject: Education Stabilization Fund (ESSER) – Internal Controls Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 – Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listing Number: 84.425C, 84.425D, 84.425U Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425D200013, S425D210013, S425U210013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Finding: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.302(b) states in part: "The financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for the following: (2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in §§ 200.328 Financial reporting . . . ." 34 CFR 76.722 states: "A State may require a subgrantee to submit reports in a manner and format that assists the State in complying with the requirements under 34 CFR 76.720 and in carrying out other responsibilities under the program." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirements. Cause: The School Corporation's management implemented a review control over the annual data reports, however, it was not sufficient enough to detect and prevent errors in annual data reports submitted to the Indiana Department of Education. Effect: Annual data reports submitted during the audit period to the Indiana Department of Education contained material errors compared to underlying transaction detail for the period reported. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: The School Corporation was required to submit Annual Data Reports to the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE) during the audit period to meet federal reporting requirements for ESSER grant awards. We noted that the ESSER I amount reported on the Year 3 report ($266,367) did not agree to the underlying expenditure record ($96,019) for the period of July 1, 2021 through June 30, 2022. Additionally, the ESSER II and ESSER III amount reported on the Year 2 report ($1,433,207, and $643,771, respectively) did not agree to the underlying expenditure records ($1,400,698, and $630,465 respectively) for the period of July 1, 2021 through June 30, 2022. We also noted that the ESSER II and ESSER III amounts reported on the Year 3 report ($4,291 and $1,522,378, respectively) did not agree to the underlying expenditure records ($4,590 and $1,774,722, respectively) for the period of July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023. Additionally, the School Corporation was not able to provide any support for the 288 full-time equivalent (FTE) positions on September 30, 2022, reported on the Year 2 CrossAct report or the 338 full-time equivalent (FTE) positions on September 30, 2023, reported on the Year 3 CrossAct report. Crowe also noted that the School Corporation reported 0 full-time equivalent (FTE) positions paid by ESSER on September 2023, but there were ESSER positions reported in the ESSER applications. Identification as a repeat finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend management review internal controls over the review of annual data reports to ensure the data to be submitted agrees to underlying transaction detail or other supporting documentation prior to the submission of the annual data report. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
Information on the federal program: Subject: Education Stabilization Fund (ESSER) – Internal Controls Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 – Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listing Number: 84.425D, 84.425U Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425D210013, S425U210013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Finding: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 2 CFR 200.430(i) states in part: "Standards for documentation of Personnel Expenses (1) Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: (i) Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated; (ii) Be incorporated into the official records of the non-Federal entity; (iii) Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non- Federal entity, not exceeding 100% of compensated activities (for IHE, this per the IHE's definition of IBS); . . . (vii) Support the distribution of the employee's salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and non-Federal award; an indirect cost activity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities which are allocated using different allocation bases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity. . . ." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements. Cause: The School Corporation’s management had not developed an effective system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish an effective system of internal controls enabled noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs: There were $1,944 of known questioned costs identified. Context: During testing of the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements, there were two vendor vouchers in a sample of 60, where the School Corporation was unable to locate any supporting documentation. These two selections totaled $1,530 charged to the grant. It was further noted that during our testing of payroll costs charged to the COVID-19 – Education Stabilization Fund, for 2 selections in a sample of 40, the School Corporation was unable to provide any support to validate the amount of payroll charged to the grant. These two selections totaled $414 charged to the COVID-19 – Education Stabilization Fund. Identification as a repeat finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the School Corporation’s management establish a system of internal controls to ensure that documentation will be maintained and that expenditures charged to the grant comply with the grant agreement and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
Information on the federal program: Subject: Education Stabilization Fund (ESSER) – Internal Controls Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 – Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listing Number: 84.425C, 84.425D, 84.425U Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425D200013, S425D210013, S425U210013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Finding: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.302(b) states in part: "The financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for the following: (2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in §§ 200.328 Financial reporting . . . ." 34 CFR 76.722 states: "A State may require a subgrantee to submit reports in a manner and format that assists the State in complying with the requirements under 34 CFR 76.720 and in carrying out other responsibilities under the program." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirements. Cause: The School Corporation's management implemented a review control over the annual data reports, however, it was not sufficient enough to detect and prevent errors in annual data reports submitted to the Indiana Department of Education. Effect: Annual data reports submitted during the audit period to the Indiana Department of Education contained material errors compared to underlying transaction detail for the period reported. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: The School Corporation was required to submit Annual Data Reports to the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE) during the audit period to meet federal reporting requirements for ESSER grant awards. We noted that the ESSER I amount reported on the Year 3 report ($266,367) did not agree to the underlying expenditure record ($96,019) for the period of July 1, 2021 through June 30, 2022. Additionally, the ESSER II and ESSER III amount reported on the Year 2 report ($1,433,207, and $643,771, respectively) did not agree to the underlying expenditure records ($1,400,698, and $630,465 respectively) for the period of July 1, 2021 through June 30, 2022. We also noted that the ESSER II and ESSER III amounts reported on the Year 3 report ($4,291 and $1,522,378, respectively) did not agree to the underlying expenditure records ($4,590 and $1,774,722, respectively) for the period of July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023. Additionally, the School Corporation was not able to provide any support for the 288 full-time equivalent (FTE) positions on September 30, 2022, reported on the Year 2 CrossAct report or the 338 full-time equivalent (FTE) positions on September 30, 2023, reported on the Year 3 CrossAct report. Crowe also noted that the School Corporation reported 0 full-time equivalent (FTE) positions paid by ESSER on September 2023, but there were ESSER positions reported in the ESSER applications. Identification as a repeat finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend management review internal controls over the review of annual data reports to ensure the data to be submitted agrees to underlying transaction detail or other supporting documentation prior to the submission of the annual data report. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
Information on the federal program: Subject: Education Stabilization Fund (ESSER) – Internal Controls Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 – Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listing Number: 84.425D, 84.425U Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425D210013, S425U210013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Finding: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 2 CFR 200.430(i) states in part: "Standards for documentation of Personnel Expenses (1) Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: (i) Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated; (ii) Be incorporated into the official records of the non-Federal entity; (iii) Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non- Federal entity, not exceeding 100% of compensated activities (for IHE, this per the IHE's definition of IBS); . . . (vii) Support the distribution of the employee's salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and non-Federal award; an indirect cost activity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities which are allocated using different allocation bases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity. . . ." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements. Cause: The School Corporation’s management had not developed an effective system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish an effective system of internal controls enabled noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs: There were $1,944 of known questioned costs identified. Context: During testing of the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements, there were two vendor vouchers in a sample of 60, where the School Corporation was unable to locate any supporting documentation. These two selections totaled $1,530 charged to the grant. It was further noted that during our testing of payroll costs charged to the COVID-19 – Education Stabilization Fund, for 2 selections in a sample of 40, the School Corporation was unable to provide any support to validate the amount of payroll charged to the grant. These two selections totaled $414 charged to the COVID-19 – Education Stabilization Fund. Identification as a repeat finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the School Corporation’s management establish a system of internal controls to ensure that documentation will be maintained and that expenditures charged to the grant comply with the grant agreement and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
FINDING 2024-003 Information on the federal program: Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Internal Controls Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Program: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program Assistance Listing Number: 10.553, 10.555 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY2024 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Finding: Significant Deficiency Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.430 states in part: (1) Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: (i) Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated; (ii) Be incorporated into the official records of the non-Federal entity; (iii) Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non-Federal entity, (iv) Encompass both federally assisted and all other activities compensated by the non-Federal entity on an integrated basis, but may include the use of subsidiary records as defined in the non-Federal entity's written policy; (v) Comply with the established accounting policies and practices of the non-Federal entity (See paragraph (h)(1)(ii) above for treatment of incidental work for IHEs.); and vii) Support the distribution of the employee's salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and non-Federal award; an indirect cost activity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities which are allocated using different allocation bases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity. Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the activities allowed or unallowed and allowable costs/cost principle compliance requirements. Cause: The School Corporation's management had not developed a system of internal controls to ensure compliance with the compliance requirements listed above. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs: $5,338 (Known questioned costs) Context: For 5 selections, in a sample of 5 payroll transactions, the School Corporation did not have time and effort logs to support the portion of the employee’s time charged to the grant. The employees’ time was split with a non-federal fund; however, the School Corporation did not have support for the allocation of the time charged to the School Lunch fund. Identification as a repeat finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend management ensure semi-annual certifications are completed for all employees charged to the grant awards at 100% and time and effort logs are maintained for all employees not charged at 100% to support work performed and charged to the grant awards. We recommend management establish a documented review by management of semi-annual certifications and time and effort logs to ensure time charged to grant awards is allowable and allocable based on work performed in accordance with grant requirements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
FINDING 2024-003 Information on the federal program: Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Internal Controls Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Program: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program Assistance Listing Number: 10.553, 10.555 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY2024 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Finding: Significant Deficiency Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.430 states in part: (1) Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: (i) Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated; (ii) Be incorporated into the official records of the non-Federal entity; (iii) Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non-Federal entity, (iv) Encompass both federally assisted and all other activities compensated by the non-Federal entity on an integrated basis, but may include the use of subsidiary records as defined in the non-Federal entity's written policy; (v) Comply with the established accounting policies and practices of the non-Federal entity (See paragraph (h)(1)(ii) above for treatment of incidental work for IHEs.); and vii) Support the distribution of the employee's salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and non-Federal award; an indirect cost activity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities which are allocated using different allocation bases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity. Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the activities allowed or unallowed and allowable costs/cost principle compliance requirements. Cause: The School Corporation's management had not developed a system of internal controls to ensure compliance with the compliance requirements listed above. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs: $5,338 (Known questioned costs) Context: For 5 selections, in a sample of 5 payroll transactions, the School Corporation did not have time and effort logs to support the portion of the employee’s time charged to the grant. The employees’ time was split with a non-federal fund; however, the School Corporation did not have support for the allocation of the time charged to the School Lunch fund. Identification as a repeat finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend management ensure semi-annual certifications are completed for all employees charged to the grant awards at 100% and time and effort logs are maintained for all employees not charged at 100% to support work performed and charged to the grant awards. We recommend management establish a documented review by management of semi-annual certifications and time and effort logs to ensure time charged to grant awards is allowable and allocable based on work performed in accordance with grant requirements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
FINDING 2024-003 Information on the federal program: Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Internal Controls Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Program: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program Assistance Listing Number: 10.553, 10.555 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY2024 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Finding: Significant Deficiency Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.430 states in part: (1) Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: (i) Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated; (ii) Be incorporated into the official records of the non-Federal entity; (iii) Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non-Federal entity, (iv) Encompass both federally assisted and all other activities compensated by the non-Federal entity on an integrated basis, but may include the use of subsidiary records as defined in the non-Federal entity's written policy; (v) Comply with the established accounting policies and practices of the non-Federal entity (See paragraph (h)(1)(ii) above for treatment of incidental work for IHEs.); and vii) Support the distribution of the employee's salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and non-Federal award; an indirect cost activity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities which are allocated using different allocation bases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity. Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the activities allowed or unallowed and allowable costs/cost principle compliance requirements. Cause: The School Corporation's management had not developed a system of internal controls to ensure compliance with the compliance requirements listed above. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs: $5,338 (Known questioned costs) Context: For 5 selections, in a sample of 5 payroll transactions, the School Corporation did not have time and effort logs to support the portion of the employee’s time charged to the grant. The employees’ time was split with a non-federal fund; however, the School Corporation did not have support for the allocation of the time charged to the School Lunch fund. Identification as a repeat finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend management ensure semi-annual certifications are completed for all employees charged to the grant awards at 100% and time and effort logs are maintained for all employees not charged at 100% to support work performed and charged to the grant awards. We recommend management establish a documented review by management of semi-annual certifications and time and effort logs to ensure time charged to grant awards is allowable and allocable based on work performed in accordance with grant requirements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
FINDING 2024-004 Information on the federal program: Subject: Education Stabilization Fund (ESSER) – Internal Controls Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 – Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listing Number: 84.425D Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425D210013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Finding: Significant Deficiency Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.302(b) states in part: "The financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for the following: (2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in §§ 200.328 Financial reporting . . . ." 34 CFR 76.722 states: "A State may require a subgrantee to submit reports in a manner and format that assists the State in complying with the requirements under 34 CFR 76.720 and in carrying out other responsibilities under the program." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the reporting compliance requirements. Cause: The School Corporation's management had not developed a system of internal controls to ensure compliance with the compliance requirements listed above. Management misinterpreted the instructions for the reporting requirements and believed that they did not need to fill in the expense information as an LEA. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: The School Corporation was required to submit one Annual Data Reports to the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE) during the audit period to meet federal reporting requirements for ESSER grant awards. We noted that the ESSER II amount reported for the reports covering the FY23 time period ($4,934,473) did not agree to the underlying expenditure records ($4,801,053) for the period of July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023. Identification as a repeat finding: This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit. The prior finding number was 2023-006. Recommendation: We recommend someone other than the preparer of the report perform a documented review prior to submission to validate the accuracy and completeness of the data submitted. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
FINDING 2024-002 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Earmarking Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants, COVID-19 - Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.173 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 21611-047-PN01, 21619-047-PN01, 22611-047-PN01, 22619-047-PN01, 22619-047-ARP Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2022-003. Condition and Context The School Corporation did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that the required level of expenditures for nonpublic school students with disabilities was met for each grant award. The School Corporation was a member of the Cooperative School Services (Cooperative). The Cooperative operated the special education programs and spent the federal money on behalf of its member schools with a portion of the proportionate share being remitted to the member school for earmarking costs. As the grant agreement was between the Indiana Department of Education and each member school, the School Corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. The School Corporation did not have effective internal controls in place to ensure that the required level of expenditures for private school and homeschooled students as nonpublic students were met. The School Corporation received the full earmarking amount from the Cooperative for grant award 21611-047-PN01 and a portion of grant award 22611-047-PN01. The School Corporation spent only a portion of the required proportionate share amount on allowable costs for each grant award tested in the audit period. For grant awards 21611-047-PN01 and 22611-047-PN01, the School Corporation spent $15,361 and $14,999, respectively, out of the required amount for the proportionate share of $48,324 and $57,883, respectively. For grant awards 21619-047-PN01, 22619-047-PN01, and 22619-047-ARP, the School Corporation did not expend any amounts as these funds were spent and handled at the Cooperative. Time and effort logs were not maintained to determine if the teachers paid from these funds were performing duties for the nonpublic students; therefore, amounts charged to the grants were not based on actual time spent for the nonpublic students as required. The School Corporation required amount of proportionate share for grant awards 21619-047-PN01, 22619-047-PN01, and 22619-047-ARP was $926, $1,913, and $1,009, respectively. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were isolated to 21611-047-PN01, 21619-047-PN01, 22611-047-PN01, 22619-047-PN01, and 22619-047-ARP grant awards. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 2 CFR 200.208(b) states in part: "The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may adjust specific Federal award conditions as needed . . ." 511 IAC 7-34-7(b) states: "The public agency, in providing special education and related services to students in nonpublic schools must expend at least an amount that is the same proportion of the public agency total subgrant under 20 U.S.C. 1411(f) as the number of nonpublic school students with disabilities, who are enrolled by their parents in nonpublic schools within its boundaries, is to the total number of students with disabilities of the same age range." Cause Through management inquiry, there was confusion at the School Corporation as to whether the Cooperative or the School Corporation handled what portions of the nonpublic proportionate share expenditures. Upon further inquiry, it was determined that the School Corporation handles the portion for the 611 grants by receiving funds from the Cooperative, and the Cooperative handles the 619 grants. However, proper time and effort logs were not maintained for expenditures used to meet the earmarking requirements; therefore, the School Corporation was not able to meet the required earmarking requirements. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the School Corporation was unable to ensure compliance with earmarking requirements. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation Management of the School Corporation should develop written policies and procedures which would require tracking of actual nonpublic proportionate share expenditures. Documentation should be maintained to show how these expenditures are being tracked to ensure compliance with the earmarking requirements. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-002 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Earmarking Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants, COVID-19 - Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.173 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 21611-047-PN01, 21619-047-PN01, 22611-047-PN01, 22619-047-PN01, 22619-047-ARP Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2022-003. Condition and Context The School Corporation did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that the required level of expenditures for nonpublic school students with disabilities was met for each grant award. The School Corporation was a member of the Cooperative School Services (Cooperative). The Cooperative operated the special education programs and spent the federal money on behalf of its member schools with a portion of the proportionate share being remitted to the member school for earmarking costs. As the grant agreement was between the Indiana Department of Education and each member school, the School Corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. The School Corporation did not have effective internal controls in place to ensure that the required level of expenditures for private school and homeschooled students as nonpublic students were met. The School Corporation received the full earmarking amount from the Cooperative for grant award 21611-047-PN01 and a portion of grant award 22611-047-PN01. The School Corporation spent only a portion of the required proportionate share amount on allowable costs for each grant award tested in the audit period. For grant awards 21611-047-PN01 and 22611-047-PN01, the School Corporation spent $15,361 and $14,999, respectively, out of the required amount for the proportionate share of $48,324 and $57,883, respectively. For grant awards 21619-047-PN01, 22619-047-PN01, and 22619-047-ARP, the School Corporation did not expend any amounts as these funds were spent and handled at the Cooperative. Time and effort logs were not maintained to determine if the teachers paid from these funds were performing duties for the nonpublic students; therefore, amounts charged to the grants were not based on actual time spent for the nonpublic students as required. The School Corporation required amount of proportionate share for grant awards 21619-047-PN01, 22619-047-PN01, and 22619-047-ARP was $926, $1,913, and $1,009, respectively. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were isolated to 21611-047-PN01, 21619-047-PN01, 22611-047-PN01, 22619-047-PN01, and 22619-047-ARP grant awards. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 2 CFR 200.208(b) states in part: "The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may adjust specific Federal award conditions as needed . . ." 511 IAC 7-34-7(b) states: "The public agency, in providing special education and related services to students in nonpublic schools must expend at least an amount that is the same proportion of the public agency total subgrant under 20 U.S.C. 1411(f) as the number of nonpublic school students with disabilities, who are enrolled by their parents in nonpublic schools within its boundaries, is to the total number of students with disabilities of the same age range." Cause Through management inquiry, there was confusion at the School Corporation as to whether the Cooperative or the School Corporation handled what portions of the nonpublic proportionate share expenditures. Upon further inquiry, it was determined that the School Corporation handles the portion for the 611 grants by receiving funds from the Cooperative, and the Cooperative handles the 619 grants. However, proper time and effort logs were not maintained for expenditures used to meet the earmarking requirements; therefore, the School Corporation was not able to meet the required earmarking requirements. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the School Corporation was unable to ensure compliance with earmarking requirements. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation Management of the School Corporation should develop written policies and procedures which would require tracking of actual nonpublic proportionate share expenditures. Documentation should be maintained to show how these expenditures are being tracked to ensure compliance with the earmarking requirements. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-002 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Earmarking Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants, COVID-19 - Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.173 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 21611-047-PN01, 21619-047-PN01, 22611-047-PN01, 22619-047-PN01, 22619-047-ARP Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2022-003. Condition and Context The School Corporation did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that the required level of expenditures for nonpublic school students with disabilities was met for each grant award. The School Corporation was a member of the Cooperative School Services (Cooperative). The Cooperative operated the special education programs and spent the federal money on behalf of its member schools with a portion of the proportionate share being remitted to the member school for earmarking costs. As the grant agreement was between the Indiana Department of Education and each member school, the School Corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. The School Corporation did not have effective internal controls in place to ensure that the required level of expenditures for private school and homeschooled students as nonpublic students were met. The School Corporation received the full earmarking amount from the Cooperative for grant award 21611-047-PN01 and a portion of grant award 22611-047-PN01. The School Corporation spent only a portion of the required proportionate share amount on allowable costs for each grant award tested in the audit period. For grant awards 21611-047-PN01 and 22611-047-PN01, the School Corporation spent $15,361 and $14,999, respectively, out of the required amount for the proportionate share of $48,324 and $57,883, respectively. For grant awards 21619-047-PN01, 22619-047-PN01, and 22619-047-ARP, the School Corporation did not expend any amounts as these funds were spent and handled at the Cooperative. Time and effort logs were not maintained to determine if the teachers paid from these funds were performing duties for the nonpublic students; therefore, amounts charged to the grants were not based on actual time spent for the nonpublic students as required. The School Corporation required amount of proportionate share for grant awards 21619-047-PN01, 22619-047-PN01, and 22619-047-ARP was $926, $1,913, and $1,009, respectively. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were isolated to 21611-047-PN01, 21619-047-PN01, 22611-047-PN01, 22619-047-PN01, and 22619-047-ARP grant awards. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 2 CFR 200.208(b) states in part: "The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may adjust specific Federal award conditions as needed . . ." 511 IAC 7-34-7(b) states: "The public agency, in providing special education and related services to students in nonpublic schools must expend at least an amount that is the same proportion of the public agency total subgrant under 20 U.S.C. 1411(f) as the number of nonpublic school students with disabilities, who are enrolled by their parents in nonpublic schools within its boundaries, is to the total number of students with disabilities of the same age range." Cause Through management inquiry, there was confusion at the School Corporation as to whether the Cooperative or the School Corporation handled what portions of the nonpublic proportionate share expenditures. Upon further inquiry, it was determined that the School Corporation handles the portion for the 611 grants by receiving funds from the Cooperative, and the Cooperative handles the 619 grants. However, proper time and effort logs were not maintained for expenditures used to meet the earmarking requirements; therefore, the School Corporation was not able to meet the required earmarking requirements. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the School Corporation was unable to ensure compliance with earmarking requirements. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation Management of the School Corporation should develop written policies and procedures which would require tracking of actual nonpublic proportionate share expenditures. Documentation should be maintained to show how these expenditures are being tracked to ensure compliance with the earmarking requirements. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-002 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Earmarking Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants, COVID-19 - Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.173 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 21611-047-PN01, 21619-047-PN01, 22611-047-PN01, 22619-047-PN01, 22619-047-ARP Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2022-003. Condition and Context The School Corporation did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that the required level of expenditures for nonpublic school students with disabilities was met for each grant award. The School Corporation was a member of the Cooperative School Services (Cooperative). The Cooperative operated the special education programs and spent the federal money on behalf of its member schools with a portion of the proportionate share being remitted to the member school for earmarking costs. As the grant agreement was between the Indiana Department of Education and each member school, the School Corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. The School Corporation did not have effective internal controls in place to ensure that the required level of expenditures for private school and homeschooled students as nonpublic students were met. The School Corporation received the full earmarking amount from the Cooperative for grant award 21611-047-PN01 and a portion of grant award 22611-047-PN01. The School Corporation spent only a portion of the required proportionate share amount on allowable costs for each grant award tested in the audit period. For grant awards 21611-047-PN01 and 22611-047-PN01, the School Corporation spent $15,361 and $14,999, respectively, out of the required amount for the proportionate share of $48,324 and $57,883, respectively. For grant awards 21619-047-PN01, 22619-047-PN01, and 22619-047-ARP, the School Corporation did not expend any amounts as these funds were spent and handled at the Cooperative. Time and effort logs were not maintained to determine if the teachers paid from these funds were performing duties for the nonpublic students; therefore, amounts charged to the grants were not based on actual time spent for the nonpublic students as required. The School Corporation required amount of proportionate share for grant awards 21619-047-PN01, 22619-047-PN01, and 22619-047-ARP was $926, $1,913, and $1,009, respectively. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were isolated to 21611-047-PN01, 21619-047-PN01, 22611-047-PN01, 22619-047-PN01, and 22619-047-ARP grant awards. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 2 CFR 200.208(b) states in part: "The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may adjust specific Federal award conditions as needed . . ." 511 IAC 7-34-7(b) states: "The public agency, in providing special education and related services to students in nonpublic schools must expend at least an amount that is the same proportion of the public agency total subgrant under 20 U.S.C. 1411(f) as the number of nonpublic school students with disabilities, who are enrolled by their parents in nonpublic schools within its boundaries, is to the total number of students with disabilities of the same age range." Cause Through management inquiry, there was confusion at the School Corporation as to whether the Cooperative or the School Corporation handled what portions of the nonpublic proportionate share expenditures. Upon further inquiry, it was determined that the School Corporation handles the portion for the 611 grants by receiving funds from the Cooperative, and the Cooperative handles the 619 grants. However, proper time and effort logs were not maintained for expenditures used to meet the earmarking requirements; therefore, the School Corporation was not able to meet the required earmarking requirements. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the School Corporation was unable to ensure compliance with earmarking requirements. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation Management of the School Corporation should develop written policies and procedures which would require tracking of actual nonpublic proportionate share expenditures. Documentation should be maintained to show how these expenditures are being tracked to ensure compliance with the earmarking requirements. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-002 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Earmarking Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants, COVID-19 - Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.173 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 21611-047-PN01, 21619-047-PN01, 22611-047-PN01, 22619-047-PN01, 22619-047-ARP Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2022-003. Condition and Context The School Corporation did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that the required level of expenditures for nonpublic school students with disabilities was met for each grant award. The School Corporation was a member of the Cooperative School Services (Cooperative). The Cooperative operated the special education programs and spent the federal money on behalf of its member schools with a portion of the proportionate share being remitted to the member school for earmarking costs. As the grant agreement was between the Indiana Department of Education and each member school, the School Corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. The School Corporation did not have effective internal controls in place to ensure that the required level of expenditures for private school and homeschooled students as nonpublic students were met. The School Corporation received the full earmarking amount from the Cooperative for grant award 21611-047-PN01 and a portion of grant award 22611-047-PN01. The School Corporation spent only a portion of the required proportionate share amount on allowable costs for each grant award tested in the audit period. For grant awards 21611-047-PN01 and 22611-047-PN01, the School Corporation spent $15,361 and $14,999, respectively, out of the required amount for the proportionate share of $48,324 and $57,883, respectively. For grant awards 21619-047-PN01, 22619-047-PN01, and 22619-047-ARP, the School Corporation did not expend any amounts as these funds were spent and handled at the Cooperative. Time and effort logs were not maintained to determine if the teachers paid from these funds were performing duties for the nonpublic students; therefore, amounts charged to the grants were not based on actual time spent for the nonpublic students as required. The School Corporation required amount of proportionate share for grant awards 21619-047-PN01, 22619-047-PN01, and 22619-047-ARP was $926, $1,913, and $1,009, respectively. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were isolated to 21611-047-PN01, 21619-047-PN01, 22611-047-PN01, 22619-047-PN01, and 22619-047-ARP grant awards. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 2 CFR 200.208(b) states in part: "The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may adjust specific Federal award conditions as needed . . ." 511 IAC 7-34-7(b) states: "The public agency, in providing special education and related services to students in nonpublic schools must expend at least an amount that is the same proportion of the public agency total subgrant under 20 U.S.C. 1411(f) as the number of nonpublic school students with disabilities, who are enrolled by their parents in nonpublic schools within its boundaries, is to the total number of students with disabilities of the same age range." Cause Through management inquiry, there was confusion at the School Corporation as to whether the Cooperative or the School Corporation handled what portions of the nonpublic proportionate share expenditures. Upon further inquiry, it was determined that the School Corporation handles the portion for the 611 grants by receiving funds from the Cooperative, and the Cooperative handles the 619 grants. However, proper time and effort logs were not maintained for expenditures used to meet the earmarking requirements; therefore, the School Corporation was not able to meet the required earmarking requirements. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the School Corporation was unable to ensure compliance with earmarking requirements. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation Management of the School Corporation should develop written policies and procedures which would require tracking of actual nonpublic proportionate share expenditures. Documentation should be maintained to show how these expenditures are being tracked to ensure compliance with the earmarking requirements. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-002 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Earmarking Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants, COVID-19 - Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.173 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 21611-047-PN01, 21619-047-PN01, 22611-047-PN01, 22619-047-PN01, 22619-047-ARP Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2022-003. Condition and Context The School Corporation did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that the required level of expenditures for nonpublic school students with disabilities was met for each grant award. The School Corporation was a member of the Cooperative School Services (Cooperative). The Cooperative operated the special education programs and spent the federal money on behalf of its member schools with a portion of the proportionate share being remitted to the member school for earmarking costs. As the grant agreement was between the Indiana Department of Education and each member school, the School Corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. The School Corporation did not have effective internal controls in place to ensure that the required level of expenditures for private school and homeschooled students as nonpublic students were met. The School Corporation received the full earmarking amount from the Cooperative for grant award 21611-047-PN01 and a portion of grant award 22611-047-PN01. The School Corporation spent only a portion of the required proportionate share amount on allowable costs for each grant award tested in the audit period. For grant awards 21611-047-PN01 and 22611-047-PN01, the School Corporation spent $15,361 and $14,999, respectively, out of the required amount for the proportionate share of $48,324 and $57,883, respectively. For grant awards 21619-047-PN01, 22619-047-PN01, and 22619-047-ARP, the School Corporation did not expend any amounts as these funds were spent and handled at the Cooperative. Time and effort logs were not maintained to determine if the teachers paid from these funds were performing duties for the nonpublic students; therefore, amounts charged to the grants were not based on actual time spent for the nonpublic students as required. The School Corporation required amount of proportionate share for grant awards 21619-047-PN01, 22619-047-PN01, and 22619-047-ARP was $926, $1,913, and $1,009, respectively. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were isolated to 21611-047-PN01, 21619-047-PN01, 22611-047-PN01, 22619-047-PN01, and 22619-047-ARP grant awards. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 2 CFR 200.208(b) states in part: "The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may adjust specific Federal award conditions as needed . . ." 511 IAC 7-34-7(b) states: "The public agency, in providing special education and related services to students in nonpublic schools must expend at least an amount that is the same proportion of the public agency total subgrant under 20 U.S.C. 1411(f) as the number of nonpublic school students with disabilities, who are enrolled by their parents in nonpublic schools within its boundaries, is to the total number of students with disabilities of the same age range." Cause Through management inquiry, there was confusion at the School Corporation as to whether the Cooperative or the School Corporation handled what portions of the nonpublic proportionate share expenditures. Upon further inquiry, it was determined that the School Corporation handles the portion for the 611 grants by receiving funds from the Cooperative, and the Cooperative handles the 619 grants. However, proper time and effort logs were not maintained for expenditures used to meet the earmarking requirements; therefore, the School Corporation was not able to meet the required earmarking requirements. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the School Corporation was unable to ensure compliance with earmarking requirements. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation Management of the School Corporation should develop written policies and procedures which would require tracking of actual nonpublic proportionate share expenditures. Documentation should be maintained to show how these expenditures are being tracked to ensure compliance with the earmarking requirements. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-003 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, COVID-19 - Special Education Grants to States, COVID-19 - Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.173 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 22611-047-PN01, 22611-047-ARP, 22619-047-ARP Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context During fiscal year 2023-2024, the School Corporation was a member of the Cooperative School Services (Cooperative). The Cooperative operated the special education programs and spent the federal money on behalf of its member schools. As the grant agreement was between the Indiana Department of Education and each member school, the School Corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. For costs related to nonpublic schools, the practice of the Cooperative was to separate out the required amount for each member school from the Cooperative budget, and the member schools would work with the nonpublic schools to determine how to spend its proportionate share amount. Each member school would then request reimbursement from the Cooperative for nonpublic school expenditures incurred. This allowed both the Cooperative and member schools to maintain control of all special education funds, property, equipment, and supplies. In the initial sample of 25 expenditures, there was no noncompliance identified. However, while performing a review of transactions for the Period of Performance compliance requirement, it was noted that nonpublic schools received direct reimbursements from the Cooperative for its proportionate share expenditures. A total of 13 expenditures were made from special education funds to nonpublic schools on behalf of the member schools during the audit period. Of the 13 expenditures, 5, totaling $2,798, were made on behalf of the School Corporation to a nonpublic school. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance was isolated to the 22611-047-PN01, 22611-047-ARP, and 22619-047-ARP grant awards. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 34 CFR 300.202(a) states: "General. Amounts provided to the LEA under Part B of the Act– (1) Must be expended in accordance with the applicable provisions of this part; (2) Must be used only to pay the excess costs of providing special education and related services to children with disabilities, consistent with paragraph (b) of this section; and (3) Must be used to supplement State, local, and other Federal funds and not to supplant those funds." 34 CFR 300.208 states: "(a) Uses. Notwithstanding §§ 300.202, 300.203(b), and 300.162(b), funds provided to an LEA under Part B of the Act may be used for the following activities: (1) Services and aids that also benefit nondisabled children. For the costs of special education and related services, and supplementary aids and services, provided in a regular class or other education-related setting to a child with a disability in accordance with the IEP of the child, even if one or more nondisabled children benefit from these services. (2) Early intervening services. To develop and implement coordinated, early intervening educational services in accordance with § 300.226. (3) High cost special education and related services. To establish and implement cost or risk sharing funds, consortia, or cooperatives for the LEA itself, or for LEAs working in a consortium of which the LEA is a part, to pay for high cost special education and related services. (b) Administrative case management. An LEA may use funds received under Part B of the Act to purchase appropriate technology for recordkeeping, data collection, and related case management activities of teachers and related services personnel providing services described in the IEP of children with disabilities, that is needed for the implementation of those case management activities." 34 CFR 300.800 states: "The Secretary provides grants under section 619 of the Act to assist States to provide special education and related services in accordance with Part B of the Act– (a) To children with disabilities aged three through five years; and (b) At a State's discretion, to two-year-old children with disabilities who will turn three during the school year." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 511 IAC 7-34-9 states in part: "(a) The public agency must hold title to and exercise continuing administrative control of all: (1) property; (2) equipment; and (3) supplies; the public agency acquires with Part B funds for the benefit of nonpublic school students with disabilities. (b) The public agency may place equipment and supplies in a nonpublic school for the period of time needed to provide special education and related services. The public agency must ensure that the equipment and supplies: (1) are used only for the provision of special education and related services; and (2) can be removed from the nonpublic school without remodeling the nonpublic school facility." Cause Management was not aware that nonpublic school officials have no authority to obligate or receive federal funds and that School Corporation must maintain control of all special education funds, property, equipment, and supplies; therefore, reimbursements were made to a nonpublic school for proportionate share expenditures. Effect The payment of proportionate share expenditures to a nonpublic school resulted in the potential misuse of funds that were meant to pay the excess costs of providing special education to students. The unallowable nature of these expenditures may also result in the School Corporation not meeting its requirements related to Non-Public Proportionate Share for the respective grants. Questioned Costs There were questioned costs identified in the amount of $17,857. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure that no direct reimbursements are made to the nonpublic schools and to ensure compliance with the grant agreement and the Activities Allowed or Unallowed and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-003 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, COVID-19 - Special Education Grants to States, COVID-19 - Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.173 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 22611-047-PN01, 22611-047-ARP, 22619-047-ARP Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context During fiscal year 2023-2024, the School Corporation was a member of the Cooperative School Services (Cooperative). The Cooperative operated the special education programs and spent the federal money on behalf of its member schools. As the grant agreement was between the Indiana Department of Education and each member school, the School Corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. For costs related to nonpublic schools, the practice of the Cooperative was to separate out the required amount for each member school from the Cooperative budget, and the member schools would work with the nonpublic schools to determine how to spend its proportionate share amount. Each member school would then request reimbursement from the Cooperative for nonpublic school expenditures incurred. This allowed both the Cooperative and member schools to maintain control of all special education funds, property, equipment, and supplies. In the initial sample of 25 expenditures, there was no noncompliance identified. However, while performing a review of transactions for the Period of Performance compliance requirement, it was noted that nonpublic schools received direct reimbursements from the Cooperative for its proportionate share expenditures. A total of 13 expenditures were made from special education funds to nonpublic schools on behalf of the member schools during the audit period. Of the 13 expenditures, 5, totaling $2,798, were made on behalf of the School Corporation to a nonpublic school. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance was isolated to the 22611-047-PN01, 22611-047-ARP, and 22619-047-ARP grant awards. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 34 CFR 300.202(a) states: "General. Amounts provided to the LEA under Part B of the Act– (1) Must be expended in accordance with the applicable provisions of this part; (2) Must be used only to pay the excess costs of providing special education and related services to children with disabilities, consistent with paragraph (b) of this section; and (3) Must be used to supplement State, local, and other Federal funds and not to supplant those funds." 34 CFR 300.208 states: "(a) Uses. Notwithstanding §§ 300.202, 300.203(b), and 300.162(b), funds provided to an LEA under Part B of the Act may be used for the following activities: (1) Services and aids that also benefit nondisabled children. For the costs of special education and related services, and supplementary aids and services, provided in a regular class or other education-related setting to a child with a disability in accordance with the IEP of the child, even if one or more nondisabled children benefit from these services. (2) Early intervening services. To develop and implement coordinated, early intervening educational services in accordance with § 300.226. (3) High cost special education and related services. To establish and implement cost or risk sharing funds, consortia, or cooperatives for the LEA itself, or for LEAs working in a consortium of which the LEA is a part, to pay for high cost special education and related services. (b) Administrative case management. An LEA may use funds received under Part B of the Act to purchase appropriate technology for recordkeeping, data collection, and related case management activities of teachers and related services personnel providing services described in the IEP of children with disabilities, that is needed for the implementation of those case management activities." 34 CFR 300.800 states: "The Secretary provides grants under section 619 of the Act to assist States to provide special education and related services in accordance with Part B of the Act– (a) To children with disabilities aged three through five years; and (b) At a State's discretion, to two-year-old children with disabilities who will turn three during the school year." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 511 IAC 7-34-9 states in part: "(a) The public agency must hold title to and exercise continuing administrative control of all: (1) property; (2) equipment; and (3) supplies; the public agency acquires with Part B funds for the benefit of nonpublic school students with disabilities. (b) The public agency may place equipment and supplies in a nonpublic school for the period of time needed to provide special education and related services. The public agency must ensure that the equipment and supplies: (1) are used only for the provision of special education and related services; and (2) can be removed from the nonpublic school without remodeling the nonpublic school facility." Cause Management was not aware that nonpublic school officials have no authority to obligate or receive federal funds and that School Corporation must maintain control of all special education funds, property, equipment, and supplies; therefore, reimbursements were made to a nonpublic school for proportionate share expenditures. Effect The payment of proportionate share expenditures to a nonpublic school resulted in the potential misuse of funds that were meant to pay the excess costs of providing special education to students. The unallowable nature of these expenditures may also result in the School Corporation not meeting its requirements related to Non-Public Proportionate Share for the respective grants. Questioned Costs There were questioned costs identified in the amount of $17,857. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure that no direct reimbursements are made to the nonpublic schools and to ensure compliance with the grant agreement and the Activities Allowed or Unallowed and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-003 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, COVID-19 - Special Education Grants to States, COVID-19 - Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.173 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 22611-047-PN01, 22611-047-ARP, 22619-047-ARP Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context During fiscal year 2023-2024, the School Corporation was a member of the Cooperative School Services (Cooperative). The Cooperative operated the special education programs and spent the federal money on behalf of its member schools. As the grant agreement was between the Indiana Department of Education and each member school, the School Corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. For costs related to nonpublic schools, the practice of the Cooperative was to separate out the required amount for each member school from the Cooperative budget, and the member schools would work with the nonpublic schools to determine how to spend its proportionate share amount. Each member school would then request reimbursement from the Cooperative for nonpublic school expenditures incurred. This allowed both the Cooperative and member schools to maintain control of all special education funds, property, equipment, and supplies. In the initial sample of 25 expenditures, there was no noncompliance identified. However, while performing a review of transactions for the Period of Performance compliance requirement, it was noted that nonpublic schools received direct reimbursements from the Cooperative for its proportionate share expenditures. A total of 13 expenditures were made from special education funds to nonpublic schools on behalf of the member schools during the audit period. Of the 13 expenditures, 5, totaling $2,798, were made on behalf of the School Corporation to a nonpublic school. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance was isolated to the 22611-047-PN01, 22611-047-ARP, and 22619-047-ARP grant awards. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 34 CFR 300.202(a) states: "General. Amounts provided to the LEA under Part B of the Act– (1) Must be expended in accordance with the applicable provisions of this part; (2) Must be used only to pay the excess costs of providing special education and related services to children with disabilities, consistent with paragraph (b) of this section; and (3) Must be used to supplement State, local, and other Federal funds and not to supplant those funds." 34 CFR 300.208 states: "(a) Uses. Notwithstanding §§ 300.202, 300.203(b), and 300.162(b), funds provided to an LEA under Part B of the Act may be used for the following activities: (1) Services and aids that also benefit nondisabled children. For the costs of special education and related services, and supplementary aids and services, provided in a regular class or other education-related setting to a child with a disability in accordance with the IEP of the child, even if one or more nondisabled children benefit from these services. (2) Early intervening services. To develop and implement coordinated, early intervening educational services in accordance with § 300.226. (3) High cost special education and related services. To establish and implement cost or risk sharing funds, consortia, or cooperatives for the LEA itself, or for LEAs working in a consortium of which the LEA is a part, to pay for high cost special education and related services. (b) Administrative case management. An LEA may use funds received under Part B of the Act to purchase appropriate technology for recordkeeping, data collection, and related case management activities of teachers and related services personnel providing services described in the IEP of children with disabilities, that is needed for the implementation of those case management activities." 34 CFR 300.800 states: "The Secretary provides grants under section 619 of the Act to assist States to provide special education and related services in accordance with Part B of the Act– (a) To children with disabilities aged three through five years; and (b) At a State's discretion, to two-year-old children with disabilities who will turn three during the school year." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 511 IAC 7-34-9 states in part: "(a) The public agency must hold title to and exercise continuing administrative control of all: (1) property; (2) equipment; and (3) supplies; the public agency acquires with Part B funds for the benefit of nonpublic school students with disabilities. (b) The public agency may place equipment and supplies in a nonpublic school for the period of time needed to provide special education and related services. The public agency must ensure that the equipment and supplies: (1) are used only for the provision of special education and related services; and (2) can be removed from the nonpublic school without remodeling the nonpublic school facility." Cause Management was not aware that nonpublic school officials have no authority to obligate or receive federal funds and that School Corporation must maintain control of all special education funds, property, equipment, and supplies; therefore, reimbursements were made to a nonpublic school for proportionate share expenditures. Effect The payment of proportionate share expenditures to a nonpublic school resulted in the potential misuse of funds that were meant to pay the excess costs of providing special education to students. The unallowable nature of these expenditures may also result in the School Corporation not meeting its requirements related to Non-Public Proportionate Share for the respective grants. Questioned Costs There were questioned costs identified in the amount of $17,857. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure that no direct reimbursements are made to the nonpublic schools and to ensure compliance with the grant agreement and the Activities Allowed or Unallowed and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-003 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, COVID-19 - Special Education Grants to States, COVID-19 - Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.173 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 22611-047-PN01, 22611-047-ARP, 22619-047-ARP Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context During fiscal year 2023-2024, the School Corporation was a member of the Cooperative School Services (Cooperative). The Cooperative operated the special education programs and spent the federal money on behalf of its member schools. As the grant agreement was between the Indiana Department of Education and each member school, the School Corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. For costs related to nonpublic schools, the practice of the Cooperative was to separate out the required amount for each member school from the Cooperative budget, and the member schools would work with the nonpublic schools to determine how to spend its proportionate share amount. Each member school would then request reimbursement from the Cooperative for nonpublic school expenditures incurred. This allowed both the Cooperative and member schools to maintain control of all special education funds, property, equipment, and supplies. In the initial sample of 25 expenditures, there was no noncompliance identified. However, while performing a review of transactions for the Period of Performance compliance requirement, it was noted that nonpublic schools received direct reimbursements from the Cooperative for its proportionate share expenditures. A total of 13 expenditures were made from special education funds to nonpublic schools on behalf of the member schools during the audit period. Of the 13 expenditures, 5, totaling $2,798, were made on behalf of the School Corporation to a nonpublic school. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance was isolated to the 22611-047-PN01, 22611-047-ARP, and 22619-047-ARP grant awards. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 34 CFR 300.202(a) states: "General. Amounts provided to the LEA under Part B of the Act– (1) Must be expended in accordance with the applicable provisions of this part; (2) Must be used only to pay the excess costs of providing special education and related services to children with disabilities, consistent with paragraph (b) of this section; and (3) Must be used to supplement State, local, and other Federal funds and not to supplant those funds." 34 CFR 300.208 states: "(a) Uses. Notwithstanding §§ 300.202, 300.203(b), and 300.162(b), funds provided to an LEA under Part B of the Act may be used for the following activities: (1) Services and aids that also benefit nondisabled children. For the costs of special education and related services, and supplementary aids and services, provided in a regular class or other education-related setting to a child with a disability in accordance with the IEP of the child, even if one or more nondisabled children benefit from these services. (2) Early intervening services. To develop and implement coordinated, early intervening educational services in accordance with § 300.226. (3) High cost special education and related services. To establish and implement cost or risk sharing funds, consortia, or cooperatives for the LEA itself, or for LEAs working in a consortium of which the LEA is a part, to pay for high cost special education and related services. (b) Administrative case management. An LEA may use funds received under Part B of the Act to purchase appropriate technology for recordkeeping, data collection, and related case management activities of teachers and related services personnel providing services described in the IEP of children with disabilities, that is needed for the implementation of those case management activities." 34 CFR 300.800 states: "The Secretary provides grants under section 619 of the Act to assist States to provide special education and related services in accordance with Part B of the Act– (a) To children with disabilities aged three through five years; and (b) At a State's discretion, to two-year-old children with disabilities who will turn three during the school year." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 511 IAC 7-34-9 states in part: "(a) The public agency must hold title to and exercise continuing administrative control of all: (1) property; (2) equipment; and (3) supplies; the public agency acquires with Part B funds for the benefit of nonpublic school students with disabilities. (b) The public agency may place equipment and supplies in a nonpublic school for the period of time needed to provide special education and related services. The public agency must ensure that the equipment and supplies: (1) are used only for the provision of special education and related services; and (2) can be removed from the nonpublic school without remodeling the nonpublic school facility." Cause Management was not aware that nonpublic school officials have no authority to obligate or receive federal funds and that School Corporation must maintain control of all special education funds, property, equipment, and supplies; therefore, reimbursements were made to a nonpublic school for proportionate share expenditures. Effect The payment of proportionate share expenditures to a nonpublic school resulted in the potential misuse of funds that were meant to pay the excess costs of providing special education to students. The unallowable nature of these expenditures may also result in the School Corporation not meeting its requirements related to Non-Public Proportionate Share for the respective grants. Questioned Costs There were questioned costs identified in the amount of $17,857. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure that no direct reimbursements are made to the nonpublic schools and to ensure compliance with the grant agreement and the Activities Allowed or Unallowed and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-003 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, COVID-19 - Special Education Grants to States, COVID-19 - Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.173 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 22611-047-PN01, 22611-047-ARP, 22619-047-ARP Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context During fiscal year 2023-2024, the School Corporation was a member of the Cooperative School Services (Cooperative). The Cooperative operated the special education programs and spent the federal money on behalf of its member schools. As the grant agreement was between the Indiana Department of Education and each member school, the School Corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. For costs related to nonpublic schools, the practice of the Cooperative was to separate out the required amount for each member school from the Cooperative budget, and the member schools would work with the nonpublic schools to determine how to spend its proportionate share amount. Each member school would then request reimbursement from the Cooperative for nonpublic school expenditures incurred. This allowed both the Cooperative and member schools to maintain control of all special education funds, property, equipment, and supplies. In the initial sample of 25 expenditures, there was no noncompliance identified. However, while performing a review of transactions for the Period of Performance compliance requirement, it was noted that nonpublic schools received direct reimbursements from the Cooperative for its proportionate share expenditures. A total of 13 expenditures were made from special education funds to nonpublic schools on behalf of the member schools during the audit period. Of the 13 expenditures, 5, totaling $2,798, were made on behalf of the School Corporation to a nonpublic school. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance was isolated to the 22611-047-PN01, 22611-047-ARP, and 22619-047-ARP grant awards. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 34 CFR 300.202(a) states: "General. Amounts provided to the LEA under Part B of the Act– (1) Must be expended in accordance with the applicable provisions of this part; (2) Must be used only to pay the excess costs of providing special education and related services to children with disabilities, consistent with paragraph (b) of this section; and (3) Must be used to supplement State, local, and other Federal funds and not to supplant those funds." 34 CFR 300.208 states: "(a) Uses. Notwithstanding §§ 300.202, 300.203(b), and 300.162(b), funds provided to an LEA under Part B of the Act may be used for the following activities: (1) Services and aids that also benefit nondisabled children. For the costs of special education and related services, and supplementary aids and services, provided in a regular class or other education-related setting to a child with a disability in accordance with the IEP of the child, even if one or more nondisabled children benefit from these services. (2) Early intervening services. To develop and implement coordinated, early intervening educational services in accordance with § 300.226. (3) High cost special education and related services. To establish and implement cost or risk sharing funds, consortia, or cooperatives for the LEA itself, or for LEAs working in a consortium of which the LEA is a part, to pay for high cost special education and related services. (b) Administrative case management. An LEA may use funds received under Part B of the Act to purchase appropriate technology for recordkeeping, data collection, and related case management activities of teachers and related services personnel providing services described in the IEP of children with disabilities, that is needed for the implementation of those case management activities." 34 CFR 300.800 states: "The Secretary provides grants under section 619 of the Act to assist States to provide special education and related services in accordance with Part B of the Act– (a) To children with disabilities aged three through five years; and (b) At a State's discretion, to two-year-old children with disabilities who will turn three during the school year." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 511 IAC 7-34-9 states in part: "(a) The public agency must hold title to and exercise continuing administrative control of all: (1) property; (2) equipment; and (3) supplies; the public agency acquires with Part B funds for the benefit of nonpublic school students with disabilities. (b) The public agency may place equipment and supplies in a nonpublic school for the period of time needed to provide special education and related services. The public agency must ensure that the equipment and supplies: (1) are used only for the provision of special education and related services; and (2) can be removed from the nonpublic school without remodeling the nonpublic school facility." Cause Management was not aware that nonpublic school officials have no authority to obligate or receive federal funds and that School Corporation must maintain control of all special education funds, property, equipment, and supplies; therefore, reimbursements were made to a nonpublic school for proportionate share expenditures. Effect The payment of proportionate share expenditures to a nonpublic school resulted in the potential misuse of funds that were meant to pay the excess costs of providing special education to students. The unallowable nature of these expenditures may also result in the School Corporation not meeting its requirements related to Non-Public Proportionate Share for the respective grants. Questioned Costs There were questioned costs identified in the amount of $17,857. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure that no direct reimbursements are made to the nonpublic schools and to ensure compliance with the grant agreement and the Activities Allowed or Unallowed and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-003 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, COVID-19 - Special Education Grants to States, COVID-19 - Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.173 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 22611-047-PN01, 22611-047-ARP, 22619-047-ARP Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context During fiscal year 2023-2024, the School Corporation was a member of the Cooperative School Services (Cooperative). The Cooperative operated the special education programs and spent the federal money on behalf of its member schools. As the grant agreement was between the Indiana Department of Education and each member school, the School Corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. For costs related to nonpublic schools, the practice of the Cooperative was to separate out the required amount for each member school from the Cooperative budget, and the member schools would work with the nonpublic schools to determine how to spend its proportionate share amount. Each member school would then request reimbursement from the Cooperative for nonpublic school expenditures incurred. This allowed both the Cooperative and member schools to maintain control of all special education funds, property, equipment, and supplies. In the initial sample of 25 expenditures, there was no noncompliance identified. However, while performing a review of transactions for the Period of Performance compliance requirement, it was noted that nonpublic schools received direct reimbursements from the Cooperative for its proportionate share expenditures. A total of 13 expenditures were made from special education funds to nonpublic schools on behalf of the member schools during the audit period. Of the 13 expenditures, 5, totaling $2,798, were made on behalf of the School Corporation to a nonpublic school. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance was isolated to the 22611-047-PN01, 22611-047-ARP, and 22619-047-ARP grant awards. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 34 CFR 300.202(a) states: "General. Amounts provided to the LEA under Part B of the Act– (1) Must be expended in accordance with the applicable provisions of this part; (2) Must be used only to pay the excess costs of providing special education and related services to children with disabilities, consistent with paragraph (b) of this section; and (3) Must be used to supplement State, local, and other Federal funds and not to supplant those funds." 34 CFR 300.208 states: "(a) Uses. Notwithstanding §§ 300.202, 300.203(b), and 300.162(b), funds provided to an LEA under Part B of the Act may be used for the following activities: (1) Services and aids that also benefit nondisabled children. For the costs of special education and related services, and supplementary aids and services, provided in a regular class or other education-related setting to a child with a disability in accordance with the IEP of the child, even if one or more nondisabled children benefit from these services. (2) Early intervening services. To develop and implement coordinated, early intervening educational services in accordance with § 300.226. (3) High cost special education and related services. To establish and implement cost or risk sharing funds, consortia, or cooperatives for the LEA itself, or for LEAs working in a consortium of which the LEA is a part, to pay for high cost special education and related services. (b) Administrative case management. An LEA may use funds received under Part B of the Act to purchase appropriate technology for recordkeeping, data collection, and related case management activities of teachers and related services personnel providing services described in the IEP of children with disabilities, that is needed for the implementation of those case management activities." 34 CFR 300.800 states: "The Secretary provides grants under section 619 of the Act to assist States to provide special education and related services in accordance with Part B of the Act– (a) To children with disabilities aged three through five years; and (b) At a State's discretion, to two-year-old children with disabilities who will turn three during the school year." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 511 IAC 7-34-9 states in part: "(a) The public agency must hold title to and exercise continuing administrative control of all: (1) property; (2) equipment; and (3) supplies; the public agency acquires with Part B funds for the benefit of nonpublic school students with disabilities. (b) The public agency may place equipment and supplies in a nonpublic school for the period of time needed to provide special education and related services. The public agency must ensure that the equipment and supplies: (1) are used only for the provision of special education and related services; and (2) can be removed from the nonpublic school without remodeling the nonpublic school facility." Cause Management was not aware that nonpublic school officials have no authority to obligate or receive federal funds and that School Corporation must maintain control of all special education funds, property, equipment, and supplies; therefore, reimbursements were made to a nonpublic school for proportionate share expenditures. Effect The payment of proportionate share expenditures to a nonpublic school resulted in the potential misuse of funds that were meant to pay the excess costs of providing special education to students. The unallowable nature of these expenditures may also result in the School Corporation not meeting its requirements related to Non-Public Proportionate Share for the respective grants. Questioned Costs There were questioned costs identified in the amount of $17,857. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure that no direct reimbursements are made to the nonpublic schools and to ensure compliance with the grant agreement and the Activities Allowed or Unallowed and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-004 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Period of Performance Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, COVID-19 - Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants, COVID-19 - Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.173 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 22611-047-PN01, 22611-047-ARP, 22619-047-PN01, 22619-047-ARP Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Period of Performance Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context During fiscal year 2023-2024, the School Corporation was a member of the Cooperative School Services (Cooperative). The Cooperative operated the special education programs and spent the federal money on behalf of its member schools. As the grant agreement was between the Indiana Department of Education and each member school, the School Corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. For Special Education Cluster awards, funds must be obligated during the 27 months, extending from July 1 of the fiscal year for which the funds were appropriated through September 30 of the second following fiscal year. When testing transactions which occurred in the liquidation period for the 22611-047-PN01, 22611-047-ARP, 22619-047-PN01, and 22619-047-ARP grant awards, two exceptions were identified in the initial sample of 5 transactions. When expanding the sample, a third exception was noted, and it was concluded that it would not be appropriate to examine the remaining 14 transactions. For the above listed awards, costs must be obligated by September 30, 2023. For the three identified exceptions, an initial purchase order was made in September, but the ultimate transaction was paid to a separate vendor than the original purchase order, and this obligation was incurred in November 2023. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.1 states in part: ". . . Period of performance means the total estimated time interval between the start of an initial Federal award and the planned end date . . ." 34 CFR 76.709(a) states: "If a State or a subgrantee does not obligate all of its grant or subgrantee funds by the end of the fiscal year for which Congress appropriated the funds, it may obligate the remaining funds during a carryover period of one additional fiscal year." 34 CFR 76.707 states in part: ". . . If the obligation is for– . . . (a) Acquisition of real or personal property. . . . The obligation is made– On the date on which the State or subgrantee makes a binding written commitment to acquire the property. . . ." Cause Management had established an initial obligation date that occurred in September of the second fiscal year but modified the final vendor for payment. The new obligation occurred after the period in which the School Corporation was allowed to incur the expense. Effect If funds are not obligated by the end of the specified date, the grantor agency is not obligated to reimburse the School Corporation for costs incurred. This may indicate that the funding reimbursed that was incurred outside of the period of performance will need to be repaid to the grantor agency, and the School Corporation will then need to support the costs with nonfederal funding. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure that no costs are incurred after the September 30 deadline and to ensure compliance with the grant agreement and the Period of Performance compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-004 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Period of Performance Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, COVID-19 - Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants, COVID-19 - Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.173 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 22611-047-PN01, 22611-047-ARP, 22619-047-PN01, 22619-047-ARP Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Period of Performance Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context During fiscal year 2023-2024, the School Corporation was a member of the Cooperative School Services (Cooperative). The Cooperative operated the special education programs and spent the federal money on behalf of its member schools. As the grant agreement was between the Indiana Department of Education and each member school, the School Corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. For Special Education Cluster awards, funds must be obligated during the 27 months, extending from July 1 of the fiscal year for which the funds were appropriated through September 30 of the second following fiscal year. When testing transactions which occurred in the liquidation period for the 22611-047-PN01, 22611-047-ARP, 22619-047-PN01, and 22619-047-ARP grant awards, two exceptions were identified in the initial sample of 5 transactions. When expanding the sample, a third exception was noted, and it was concluded that it would not be appropriate to examine the remaining 14 transactions. For the above listed awards, costs must be obligated by September 30, 2023. For the three identified exceptions, an initial purchase order was made in September, but the ultimate transaction was paid to a separate vendor than the original purchase order, and this obligation was incurred in November 2023. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.1 states in part: ". . . Period of performance means the total estimated time interval between the start of an initial Federal award and the planned end date . . ." 34 CFR 76.709(a) states: "If a State or a subgrantee does not obligate all of its grant or subgrantee funds by the end of the fiscal year for which Congress appropriated the funds, it may obligate the remaining funds during a carryover period of one additional fiscal year." 34 CFR 76.707 states in part: ". . . If the obligation is for– . . . (a) Acquisition of real or personal property. . . . The obligation is made– On the date on which the State or subgrantee makes a binding written commitment to acquire the property. . . ." Cause Management had established an initial obligation date that occurred in September of the second fiscal year but modified the final vendor for payment. The new obligation occurred after the period in which the School Corporation was allowed to incur the expense. Effect If funds are not obligated by the end of the specified date, the grantor agency is not obligated to reimburse the School Corporation for costs incurred. This may indicate that the funding reimbursed that was incurred outside of the period of performance will need to be repaid to the grantor agency, and the School Corporation will then need to support the costs with nonfederal funding. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure that no costs are incurred after the September 30 deadline and to ensure compliance with the grant agreement and the Period of Performance compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-004 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Period of Performance Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, COVID-19 - Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants, COVID-19 - Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.173 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 22611-047-PN01, 22611-047-ARP, 22619-047-PN01, 22619-047-ARP Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Period of Performance Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context During fiscal year 2023-2024, the School Corporation was a member of the Cooperative School Services (Cooperative). The Cooperative operated the special education programs and spent the federal money on behalf of its member schools. As the grant agreement was between the Indiana Department of Education and each member school, the School Corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. For Special Education Cluster awards, funds must be obligated during the 27 months, extending from July 1 of the fiscal year for which the funds were appropriated through September 30 of the second following fiscal year. When testing transactions which occurred in the liquidation period for the 22611-047-PN01, 22611-047-ARP, 22619-047-PN01, and 22619-047-ARP grant awards, two exceptions were identified in the initial sample of 5 transactions. When expanding the sample, a third exception was noted, and it was concluded that it would not be appropriate to examine the remaining 14 transactions. For the above listed awards, costs must be obligated by September 30, 2023. For the three identified exceptions, an initial purchase order was made in September, but the ultimate transaction was paid to a separate vendor than the original purchase order, and this obligation was incurred in November 2023. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.1 states in part: ". . . Period of performance means the total estimated time interval between the start of an initial Federal award and the planned end date . . ." 34 CFR 76.709(a) states: "If a State or a subgrantee does not obligate all of its grant or subgrantee funds by the end of the fiscal year for which Congress appropriated the funds, it may obligate the remaining funds during a carryover period of one additional fiscal year." 34 CFR 76.707 states in part: ". . . If the obligation is for– . . . (a) Acquisition of real or personal property. . . . The obligation is made– On the date on which the State or subgrantee makes a binding written commitment to acquire the property. . . ." Cause Management had established an initial obligation date that occurred in September of the second fiscal year but modified the final vendor for payment. The new obligation occurred after the period in which the School Corporation was allowed to incur the expense. Effect If funds are not obligated by the end of the specified date, the grantor agency is not obligated to reimburse the School Corporation for costs incurred. This may indicate that the funding reimbursed that was incurred outside of the period of performance will need to be repaid to the grantor agency, and the School Corporation will then need to support the costs with nonfederal funding. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure that no costs are incurred after the September 30 deadline and to ensure compliance with the grant agreement and the Period of Performance compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-004 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Period of Performance Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, COVID-19 - Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants, COVID-19 - Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.173 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 22611-047-PN01, 22611-047-ARP, 22619-047-PN01, 22619-047-ARP Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Period of Performance Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context During fiscal year 2023-2024, the School Corporation was a member of the Cooperative School Services (Cooperative). The Cooperative operated the special education programs and spent the federal money on behalf of its member schools. As the grant agreement was between the Indiana Department of Education and each member school, the School Corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. For Special Education Cluster awards, funds must be obligated during the 27 months, extending from July 1 of the fiscal year for which the funds were appropriated through September 30 of the second following fiscal year. When testing transactions which occurred in the liquidation period for the 22611-047-PN01, 22611-047-ARP, 22619-047-PN01, and 22619-047-ARP grant awards, two exceptions were identified in the initial sample of 5 transactions. When expanding the sample, a third exception was noted, and it was concluded that it would not be appropriate to examine the remaining 14 transactions. For the above listed awards, costs must be obligated by September 30, 2023. For the three identified exceptions, an initial purchase order was made in September, but the ultimate transaction was paid to a separate vendor than the original purchase order, and this obligation was incurred in November 2023. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.1 states in part: ". . . Period of performance means the total estimated time interval between the start of an initial Federal award and the planned end date . . ." 34 CFR 76.709(a) states: "If a State or a subgrantee does not obligate all of its grant or subgrantee funds by the end of the fiscal year for which Congress appropriated the funds, it may obligate the remaining funds during a carryover period of one additional fiscal year." 34 CFR 76.707 states in part: ". . . If the obligation is for– . . . (a) Acquisition of real or personal property. . . . The obligation is made– On the date on which the State or subgrantee makes a binding written commitment to acquire the property. . . ." Cause Management had established an initial obligation date that occurred in September of the second fiscal year but modified the final vendor for payment. The new obligation occurred after the period in which the School Corporation was allowed to incur the expense. Effect If funds are not obligated by the end of the specified date, the grantor agency is not obligated to reimburse the School Corporation for costs incurred. This may indicate that the funding reimbursed that was incurred outside of the period of performance will need to be repaid to the grantor agency, and the School Corporation will then need to support the costs with nonfederal funding. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure that no costs are incurred after the September 30 deadline and to ensure compliance with the grant agreement and the Period of Performance compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-004 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Period of Performance Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, COVID-19 - Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants, COVID-19 - Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.173 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 22611-047-PN01, 22611-047-ARP, 22619-047-PN01, 22619-047-ARP Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Period of Performance Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context During fiscal year 2023-2024, the School Corporation was a member of the Cooperative School Services (Cooperative). The Cooperative operated the special education programs and spent the federal money on behalf of its member schools. As the grant agreement was between the Indiana Department of Education and each member school, the School Corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. For Special Education Cluster awards, funds must be obligated during the 27 months, extending from July 1 of the fiscal year for which the funds were appropriated through September 30 of the second following fiscal year. When testing transactions which occurred in the liquidation period for the 22611-047-PN01, 22611-047-ARP, 22619-047-PN01, and 22619-047-ARP grant awards, two exceptions were identified in the initial sample of 5 transactions. When expanding the sample, a third exception was noted, and it was concluded that it would not be appropriate to examine the remaining 14 transactions. For the above listed awards, costs must be obligated by September 30, 2023. For the three identified exceptions, an initial purchase order was made in September, but the ultimate transaction was paid to a separate vendor than the original purchase order, and this obligation was incurred in November 2023. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.1 states in part: ". . . Period of performance means the total estimated time interval between the start of an initial Federal award and the planned end date . . ." 34 CFR 76.709(a) states: "If a State or a subgrantee does not obligate all of its grant or subgrantee funds by the end of the fiscal year for which Congress appropriated the funds, it may obligate the remaining funds during a carryover period of one additional fiscal year." 34 CFR 76.707 states in part: ". . . If the obligation is for– . . . (a) Acquisition of real or personal property. . . . The obligation is made– On the date on which the State or subgrantee makes a binding written commitment to acquire the property. . . ." Cause Management had established an initial obligation date that occurred in September of the second fiscal year but modified the final vendor for payment. The new obligation occurred after the period in which the School Corporation was allowed to incur the expense. Effect If funds are not obligated by the end of the specified date, the grantor agency is not obligated to reimburse the School Corporation for costs incurred. This may indicate that the funding reimbursed that was incurred outside of the period of performance will need to be repaid to the grantor agency, and the School Corporation will then need to support the costs with nonfederal funding. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure that no costs are incurred after the September 30 deadline and to ensure compliance with the grant agreement and the Period of Performance compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-004 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Period of Performance Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, COVID-19 - Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants, COVID-19 - Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.173 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 22611-047-PN01, 22611-047-ARP, 22619-047-PN01, 22619-047-ARP Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Period of Performance Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context During fiscal year 2023-2024, the School Corporation was a member of the Cooperative School Services (Cooperative). The Cooperative operated the special education programs and spent the federal money on behalf of its member schools. As the grant agreement was between the Indiana Department of Education and each member school, the School Corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. For Special Education Cluster awards, funds must be obligated during the 27 months, extending from July 1 of the fiscal year for which the funds were appropriated through September 30 of the second following fiscal year. When testing transactions which occurred in the liquidation period for the 22611-047-PN01, 22611-047-ARP, 22619-047-PN01, and 22619-047-ARP grant awards, two exceptions were identified in the initial sample of 5 transactions. When expanding the sample, a third exception was noted, and it was concluded that it would not be appropriate to examine the remaining 14 transactions. For the above listed awards, costs must be obligated by September 30, 2023. For the three identified exceptions, an initial purchase order was made in September, but the ultimate transaction was paid to a separate vendor than the original purchase order, and this obligation was incurred in November 2023. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.1 states in part: ". . . Period of performance means the total estimated time interval between the start of an initial Federal award and the planned end date . . ." 34 CFR 76.709(a) states: "If a State or a subgrantee does not obligate all of its grant or subgrantee funds by the end of the fiscal year for which Congress appropriated the funds, it may obligate the remaining funds during a carryover period of one additional fiscal year." 34 CFR 76.707 states in part: ". . . If the obligation is for– . . . (a) Acquisition of real or personal property. . . . The obligation is made– On the date on which the State or subgrantee makes a binding written commitment to acquire the property. . . ." Cause Management had established an initial obligation date that occurred in September of the second fiscal year but modified the final vendor for payment. The new obligation occurred after the period in which the School Corporation was allowed to incur the expense. Effect If funds are not obligated by the end of the specified date, the grantor agency is not obligated to reimburse the School Corporation for costs incurred. This may indicate that the funding reimbursed that was incurred outside of the period of performance will need to be repaid to the grantor agency, and the School Corporation will then need to support the costs with nonfederal funding. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure that no costs are incurred after the September 30 deadline and to ensure compliance with the grant agreement and the Period of Performance compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-004 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Period of Performance Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, COVID-19 - Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants, COVID-19 - Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.173 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 22611-047-PN01, 22611-047-ARP, 22619-047-PN01, 22619-047-ARP Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Period of Performance Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context During fiscal year 2023-2024, the School Corporation was a member of the Cooperative School Services (Cooperative). The Cooperative operated the special education programs and spent the federal money on behalf of its member schools. As the grant agreement was between the Indiana Department of Education and each member school, the School Corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. For Special Education Cluster awards, funds must be obligated during the 27 months, extending from July 1 of the fiscal year for which the funds were appropriated through September 30 of the second following fiscal year. When testing transactions which occurred in the liquidation period for the 22611-047-PN01, 22611-047-ARP, 22619-047-PN01, and 22619-047-ARP grant awards, two exceptions were identified in the initial sample of 5 transactions. When expanding the sample, a third exception was noted, and it was concluded that it would not be appropriate to examine the remaining 14 transactions. For the above listed awards, costs must be obligated by September 30, 2023. For the three identified exceptions, an initial purchase order was made in September, but the ultimate transaction was paid to a separate vendor than the original purchase order, and this obligation was incurred in November 2023. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.1 states in part: ". . . Period of performance means the total estimated time interval between the start of an initial Federal award and the planned end date . . ." 34 CFR 76.709(a) states: "If a State or a subgrantee does not obligate all of its grant or subgrantee funds by the end of the fiscal year for which Congress appropriated the funds, it may obligate the remaining funds during a carryover period of one additional fiscal year." 34 CFR 76.707 states in part: ". . . If the obligation is for– . . . (a) Acquisition of real or personal property. . . . The obligation is made– On the date on which the State or subgrantee makes a binding written commitment to acquire the property. . . ." Cause Management had established an initial obligation date that occurred in September of the second fiscal year but modified the final vendor for payment. The new obligation occurred after the period in which the School Corporation was allowed to incur the expense. Effect If funds are not obligated by the end of the specified date, the grantor agency is not obligated to reimburse the School Corporation for costs incurred. This may indicate that the funding reimbursed that was incurred outside of the period of performance will need to be repaid to the grantor agency, and the School Corporation will then need to support the costs with nonfederal funding. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure that no costs are incurred after the September 30 deadline and to ensure compliance with the grant agreement and the Period of Performance compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-004 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Period of Performance Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, COVID-19 - Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants, COVID-19 - Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.173 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 22611-047-PN01, 22611-047-ARP, 22619-047-PN01, 22619-047-ARP Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Period of Performance Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context During fiscal year 2023-2024, the School Corporation was a member of the Cooperative School Services (Cooperative). The Cooperative operated the special education programs and spent the federal money on behalf of its member schools. As the grant agreement was between the Indiana Department of Education and each member school, the School Corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. For Special Education Cluster awards, funds must be obligated during the 27 months, extending from July 1 of the fiscal year for which the funds were appropriated through September 30 of the second following fiscal year. When testing transactions which occurred in the liquidation period for the 22611-047-PN01, 22611-047-ARP, 22619-047-PN01, and 22619-047-ARP grant awards, two exceptions were identified in the initial sample of 5 transactions. When expanding the sample, a third exception was noted, and it was concluded that it would not be appropriate to examine the remaining 14 transactions. For the above listed awards, costs must be obligated by September 30, 2023. For the three identified exceptions, an initial purchase order was made in September, but the ultimate transaction was paid to a separate vendor than the original purchase order, and this obligation was incurred in November 2023. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.1 states in part: ". . . Period of performance means the total estimated time interval between the start of an initial Federal award and the planned end date . . ." 34 CFR 76.709(a) states: "If a State or a subgrantee does not obligate all of its grant or subgrantee funds by the end of the fiscal year for which Congress appropriated the funds, it may obligate the remaining funds during a carryover period of one additional fiscal year." 34 CFR 76.707 states in part: ". . . If the obligation is for– . . . (a) Acquisition of real or personal property. . . . The obligation is made– On the date on which the State or subgrantee makes a binding written commitment to acquire the property. . . ." Cause Management had established an initial obligation date that occurred in September of the second fiscal year but modified the final vendor for payment. The new obligation occurred after the period in which the School Corporation was allowed to incur the expense. Effect If funds are not obligated by the end of the specified date, the grantor agency is not obligated to reimburse the School Corporation for costs incurred. This may indicate that the funding reimbursed that was incurred outside of the period of performance will need to be repaid to the grantor agency, and the School Corporation will then need to support the costs with nonfederal funding. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure that no costs are incurred after the September 30 deadline and to ensure compliance with the grant agreement and the Period of Performance compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
Condition: The following conditions were found during audit testing of two ERA 2 quarterly reports: 1. DSHA procedures over the reporting did not include the documentation of the preparation and review of quarterly reports selected for testing. 2. Audit testing of a statistical sample of 15 cases processed during the year ended June 30, 2024, revealed an income calculation on a case which resulted in the incorrect calculation of Area Median Income (AMI) percentage. The AMI percentages calculated at the case level are utilized to support required demographic reporting. 3. Supporting documentation was not retained for information on the reports selected for testing. 4. A review of the reports selected for testing revealed the following: a. The demographic information section of the ERA 2 report for the quarter ended December 30, 2023, was not completed. b. Evidence could not be provided showing how administrative and housing stability service amounts expended and obligated were calculated. A similar finding was noted during the audit of the year ended June 30, 2023. Refer to finding 2023-005. Criteria: United States Department of the Treasury ERA Program Reporting Guidance version 3.2 was issued March 29, 2022, provides detailed reporting requirements. 2 CFR § 200.303 requires the implementation of effective internal controls: “Internal controls requires the non-federal entity to establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award.” Questioned Costs: None Effect: Reports required by the U.S. Treasury were not submitted timely, accurately, and supported by contemporaneously prepared documentation. Information required for the U.S. Treasury to calculate the required reallocations was not accurately reported on the quarterly reports submitted. Cause: Internal controls over reporting were not appropriately designed, implemented, or operated. DSHA’s internal controls over the reporting process did not ensure information required information was captured. Recommendation: We recommend DSHA enhance its policies and procedures for preparing and approving required reports prior to submission.
Reference Number: 2024-001 Prior Year Finding: No Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development State Agency: Department of Community Affairs Federal Program: Community Development Block Grants Disaster Recovery (CDBG-DR) Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 14.269, 14.272 Award Number and Year: B-13-DS-34-0001, B-13-DS-34002 Compliance Requirement: Reporting – Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance, Material Noncompliance Criteria or specific requirement: Compliance: Per the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA), prime (direct) recipients of grants or cooperative agreements are required to report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act Subaward Reporting System (FSRS). Reports must be filed in FSRS by the end of the month following the month in which the prime recipient awards any sub-grant greater than or equal to $30,000. If the initial award is below $30,000 but subsequent grant modifications result in a total award equal to or over $30,000, the award will be subject to the reporting requirements as of the date the award exceeds $30,000. If the initial award equals or exceeds $30,000 but funding is subsequently de-obligated such that the total award amount falls below $30,000, the award continues to be subject to FFATA reporting requirements. The following key data elements must be reported: Subawardee Name and Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) number; Amount of Subaward (inclusive of modifications); Subaward Obligation/Action Date; Date of Report Submission; Subaward Number; Project Description; and Names and Compensation of Highly Compensated Officers. (Names and Compensation of Highly Compensated Officers must only be reported when the entity in the preceding fiscal year received 80 percent or more of its annual gross revenues in Federal awards; and $25,000,000 or more in annual gross revenues from Federal awards; and the public does not have access to this information about the compensation of the senior executives of the entity through periodic reports filed under section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §§ 78m(a), 78o(d)) or section 6104 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.) Control: Per 2 CFR section 200.303(a), a non-Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should comply with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition: The Department of Community Affairs (Department) did not report subaward information to FSRS in accordance with FFATA requirements. Context: Three of four subawards selected for testing were not reported to FSRS in accordance with FFATA reporting requirements. Specifically, we noted the following: • 1 of 4 subawards was not reported timely. The subaward amendment was issued 1/21/2023 and was not reported until 5/20/2024, or fifteen months late. • 2 of 4 subawards were not reported to FSRS. SEE SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS FOR CHART/TABLE Cause: The Department did not have sufficient procedures to ensure that subaward information was reported timely to FSRS. Internal controls did not prevent or detect the errors. Effect: Subawards were not reported to FSRS in accordance with FFATA requirements. Questioned costs: None noted. Recommendation: We recommend that the Department develop controls and procedures to ensure that all required subawards are reported to FSRS no later than the end of the month following the month of issuance. Views of responsible officials: The New Jersey Department of Community Affairs (DCA) recognizes the need to strengthen its monitoring of Subaward reporting requirements to ensure timely reporting. To address this, the agency is already in the process of updating its policies and procedures to enhance oversight and compliance. As part of the policy updates, the DCA is assigning designated staff to track Subaward issuance and reporting. This ensures clear accountability and improves oversight of reporting requirements. The DCA is working to integrate automated reminders and alerts into its process to notify designated staff of upcoming Subaward reporting deadlines. This proactive approach minimizes the risk of missed reporting obligations. The DCA is working to establish a process for conducting periodic compliance reviews to assess adherence to FFATA Subaward reporting requirements. This review will help identify potential issues early and allow for timely corrective actions. To reinforce FFATA compliance, the DCA is working to implement a training initiative to ensure designated staff are knowledgeable about FFATA requirements and the importance of timely reporting. Regular communication efforts will further promote awareness and adherence to reporting deadlines.
Reference Number: 2024-001 Prior Year Finding: No Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development State Agency: Department of Community Affairs Federal Program: Community Development Block Grants Disaster Recovery (CDBG-DR) Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 14.269, 14.272 Award Number and Year: B-13-DS-34-0001, B-13-DS-34002 Compliance Requirement: Reporting – Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance, Material Noncompliance Criteria or specific requirement: Compliance: Per the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA), prime (direct) recipients of grants or cooperative agreements are required to report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act Subaward Reporting System (FSRS). Reports must be filed in FSRS by the end of the month following the month in which the prime recipient awards any sub-grant greater than or equal to $30,000. If the initial award is below $30,000 but subsequent grant modifications result in a total award equal to or over $30,000, the award will be subject to the reporting requirements as of the date the award exceeds $30,000. If the initial award equals or exceeds $30,000 but funding is subsequently de-obligated such that the total award amount falls below $30,000, the award continues to be subject to FFATA reporting requirements. The following key data elements must be reported: Subawardee Name and Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) number; Amount of Subaward (inclusive of modifications); Subaward Obligation/Action Date; Date of Report Submission; Subaward Number; Project Description; and Names and Compensation of Highly Compensated Officers. (Names and Compensation of Highly Compensated Officers must only be reported when the entity in the preceding fiscal year received 80 percent or more of its annual gross revenues in Federal awards; and $25,000,000 or more in annual gross revenues from Federal awards; and the public does not have access to this information about the compensation of the senior executives of the entity through periodic reports filed under section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §§ 78m(a), 78o(d)) or section 6104 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.) Control: Per 2 CFR section 200.303(a), a non-Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should comply with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition: The Department of Community Affairs (Department) did not report subaward information to FSRS in accordance with FFATA requirements. Context: Three of four subawards selected for testing were not reported to FSRS in accordance with FFATA reporting requirements. Specifically, we noted the following: • 1 of 4 subawards was not reported timely. The subaward amendment was issued 1/21/2023 and was not reported until 5/20/2024, or fifteen months late. • 2 of 4 subawards were not reported to FSRS. SEE SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS FOR CHART/TABLE Cause: The Department did not have sufficient procedures to ensure that subaward information was reported timely to FSRS. Internal controls did not prevent or detect the errors. Effect: Subawards were not reported to FSRS in accordance with FFATA requirements. Questioned costs: None noted. Recommendation: We recommend that the Department develop controls and procedures to ensure that all required subawards are reported to FSRS no later than the end of the month following the month of issuance. Views of responsible officials: The New Jersey Department of Community Affairs (DCA) recognizes the need to strengthen its monitoring of Subaward reporting requirements to ensure timely reporting. To address this, the agency is already in the process of updating its policies and procedures to enhance oversight and compliance. As part of the policy updates, the DCA is assigning designated staff to track Subaward issuance and reporting. This ensures clear accountability and improves oversight of reporting requirements. The DCA is working to integrate automated reminders and alerts into its process to notify designated staff of upcoming Subaward reporting deadlines. This proactive approach minimizes the risk of missed reporting obligations. The DCA is working to establish a process for conducting periodic compliance reviews to assess adherence to FFATA Subaward reporting requirements. This review will help identify potential issues early and allow for timely corrective actions. To reinforce FFATA compliance, the DCA is working to implement a training initiative to ensure designated staff are knowledgeable about FFATA requirements and the importance of timely reporting. Regular communication efforts will further promote awareness and adherence to reporting deadlines.